HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/11/06 - Minutes November 6, 1991
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
ReQular MeetinQ
A. CALL TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held
on Wednesday, November 6, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center,
located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting
was called to order at 7:23 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander.
Present were Councilmembers: Charles J. Buquet II, Diane Williams, Pamela J.
Wright, and Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander.
Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda
D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Tarry
Smith, Park Planning/Development Superintendent; Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy
Fong, Sr. Planner; Alan Warren, Associate Planner; Richard Alcorn, Code
Enforcement Supervisor; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Paul Rougeau, Traffic
Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer; Joe
Schultz, Community Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Officer; Duane Baker,
Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis
Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lt. Joe Henry, Rancho
Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk.
Absent was: Mayor Dennis L. Stout, who was out of town on City business.
B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
B1. Councilmember Wright stated she and Councilmember Williams were at a Gangs
and Drugs Task Force meeting earlier in the day, and stated the City's
C.H.O.I.C.E.S. program was spotlighted.
B2. Councilmember Williams also commented on the program, stating that now it
is planned to be expanded, whereby other jurisdictions are wanting the program
in their area. She added that she, too, is very proud of the fact that Rancho
Cucamonga was being spotlighted for this.
, , , , , ,
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 2
C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
Cl.
Steven Carroll, 10801 Lemon, brought up the fact that pornographic
material is displayed too publicly in various commercial establishments.
He stated he had worked with Duane Baker on this, and that the
pornographic material is being moved to the back of a local store, as was
requested, in order to get it out of public view. Mr. Carroll was
requesting there be developed a "blinder rack" ordinance adopted by the
City to keep pornographic material from being displayed from the front of
a store.
Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, added there is not an ordinance at
the present time regarding this, but that most stores do cooperate with the City
if asked to move pornographic material to another location within the store.
Councilmember Buquet felt if the City was having problems with getting stores to
comply with the City's request to move the material, then at that time he could
see going ahead with developing an ordinance, but thought that an ordinance was
not really necessary at this time since the business owners are complying with
the City's request.
Mr. Carroll felt Rancho Cucamonga was a very clean community.
C2.
Jim Holland, 5915 San Sevaine, of the Huntington Estates, felt Summit was
unsafe where it goes from two lanes to one. He asked the Council when
both sides of the highway might be open to the public. He stated he also
had a concern about the bridle trail as to its design, and when
construction would start. He stated he also had questions regarding the
assessments in his area.
Jack Lam, City Manager, referred Mr. Holland to Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, and
Brad Buller, City Planner, to get his questions answered.
C3.
Terry Marquez, 8256 London, brought up the statue of Jack Benny article
she had recently read in the newspaper. She stated she did not know what
Jack Benny had done for the community in order to warrant this statue.
She stated she had a petition from over 100 residents who did not think
the Jack Benny statue should be in front of City Hall.
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this has not come to the City Council for a
decision, that this was an idea of a private party to make this statue of Jack
Benny.
Councilmember Buquet added the City Council has not discussed this nor decided
on it at this time.
, , , , ,
D. CONSENT CALENDAR
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Item D4 has a new resolution with an expiration
date of November 8, 1991.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 3
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Item D14 had an incorrect name as far as the
awarding of the contract, and stated the item should read "awarded to R.G.
Construction", instead of "K.E.C. Construction."
D1. Approval of Minutes: October 16, 1991
D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/16/91 and 10/23/91 and Payroll
ending 10/10/91 for the total amount of $1,881,310.79.
D3. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the
Haven Avenue Improvements at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad crossing
(P.U.C. No. 2-96.7), to be funded from Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22-
4637-8851. (0601-01 BID)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-314
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
THE HAVEN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND
SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING (P.U.C. NO. 2-96.7), IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY
CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS
D4. Approval of Resolution No. 91-012F to extend Comcast Cablevision's
Franchise. (1205-01CATV)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-012F
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON
EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
D5. Approval to destroy records and documents which are no longer required as
provided under Government Code Section 34090. (0304-00 REC MGMT)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-315
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY
RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED
UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090
D6. Approval to authorize the assignment of an Adult Crossing Guard at the
intersection of Bougainvillea Court and Peach Place for Windrows Elementary
School. (1301-05 CROS GUARD)
D7. Approval of a Resolution supporting a Ballot Measure to repeal Booking Fees
authorized by SB 2557. (0401-12 FEES)
(i)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(s)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 4
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-316
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING A BALLOT MEASURE TO REPEAL
BOOKING FEES AUTHORIZED BY SB 2557
D8. Approval to summarily vacate Orchard Avenue from Terra Vista Parkway east
to approximately 220 feet southwesterly requested by Lewis Homes of California -
APN: 227-151-27. (1110-18 VACATE ST)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-317
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF
ORCHARD AVENUE FROM TERRAVISTA PARKWAY EAST TO APPROXIMATELY
220 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY - APN: 227-151-27
D9. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the
proposed Vinmar Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to the
Chaffey Street alley and issuance of a categorical exemption therefore. (1403-06
EIS)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-318
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL
STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED
VINMARAVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO
THE CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY
D10. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the
proposed Calaveras Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to the
Chaffey Street Alley and issuance of a categorical exemption therefore. (1403-06
EIS)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-319
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL
STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED
CALAVERAS AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET
TO THE CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY
Dll. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the
proposed Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to 310
feet south of Chaffey Street alley and issuance of a categorical exemption
therefore. (1403-06 EIS)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 5
RESOLUTION NO. 91-320
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL
STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED
SIERRA MADRE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH
STREET TO 310 FEET SOUTH OF CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY
D12. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the
proposed Rochester Avenue Street Improvement and Traffic Signal Projects from
Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue and issuance of a categorical exemption
therefore. (1403-06 EIS)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-321
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL
STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED
ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL
PROJECTS FROM VICTORIA PARK LANE TO HIGHLAND AVENUE
D13. Approval of Map, subject to fulfillment of the Conditions of approval and
normal processing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, for
Parcel Map 13724, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between
Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Foothill Marketplace Partners.
(1002-09 MAP)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-322
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 13724 AND
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, WITH THE RECORDATION OF SAID MAP
SUBJECT TO FULFILLMENT OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL,
SUBMITTAL OF SECURITIES, AND NORMAL PROCESSING TO THE
SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND CITY ATTORNEY
D14. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 91-074)
for Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Project, located from Arrow Route to
Ninth Street to K.E.C. Construction for the amount of $159,524.00 ($145,022.00
plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Community Block Grant Account No. 28-
4333-8951. (0511-01 AWARD) (0602-01 CONTRACT)
D15. Approval of Consultant Contract (CO 91-075) for Day Creek Mello-Roos
District (84-1) Refinancing to Stone & Youngberg. (0602-01 CONTRACT)
D16. Approval of Disposition of excess property for a portion of 25th Street,
located west of Etiwanda Avenue (APN: 225-082-01). (0604-02 SURPL SAL)
(io)
(ii)
(i2)
(is)
(14)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 6
RESOLUTION NO. 91-295
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN
ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAAND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE HAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY
OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE
SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN
D17. Approval of Map, execution of Pre-Condemnation Agreement, Maintenance
Agreement for on-site temporary detention basin, Improvement Agreement and
Improvement Securities for on-site public improvements for Tract 14139, Joint
Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities with Ahmanson Developments and
Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated, for off-site improvements for Tract Nos. 14139,
14379 and 14380, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No.
7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. i and 7 for Tract 14139 located
on the southwest corner of 25th Street and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ahmanson
Developments. (1002-09MAP) (0602-01 AGREE IMPR) (0401-026 LNSCAPE MD) (1120-01
ST LT MD)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-296
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT,
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND THE FINAL MAP OF
TRACT 14139
RESOLUTION NO. 91-297
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14139
D18. Approval of Map, execution of Pre-Condemnation Agreement, Maintenance
Agreement for on-site temporary detention basin, Improvement Agreement and
Improvement Securities for on-site public improvements for Tracts 14379 and 14380
(Tentative Tract 13527), Joint Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities
with Watt Inland Empire and Ahmanson Developments for off-site improvements for
Tract Nos. 14379, 14380 and 14139, ordering the annexation to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and
7 for Tract Nos. 14379, 14380, located on the north side of 24th street, west of
Etiwanda Avenue submitted by Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated. (1002-09 HAP)
(0602-01 AGREE IMPR) (0401-26 LNSCAPE MD) (1120-01 ST LT MD)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 7
RESOLUTION NO. 91-298
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT,
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN,
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT
NOS. 14379 AND 14380
RESOLUTION NO. 91r299
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN
TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS.
14379 AND 14380
D19. Approval of Terra Vista Street Capping Agreement submitted by Lewis
Development Company, Lewis Homes of California, and Western Land Properties.
(0602-01 CONTRACT)
D20. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13566-3,
located on the southwest corner of Summit Avenue and San Sevaine Avenue,
submitted by Century American. (0602-01 AGREE EXTN)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-323
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-3
D21. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for CUP 88-18, located
on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue,
submitted by Diversified Properties Company. (0602-01 AGREE EXTN)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-324
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 88-18
D22. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 11838,
located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane,
submitted by the William Lyon Company. (0602-01 AGREE EXTN)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-325
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11838
(i7)
(i9)
(2o)
(22)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 8
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
D23. Approval to accept Landscaped Pedestrian Trail adjacent to Tract 13440.
(1404-08 TRAILS)
D24. Approval to accept Storm Drain Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice
of Completion for Tract 13812 - Etiwanda Storm Drain, located on Etiwanda Avenue
between Highland Avenue and Summit Avenue. (0405-04 BOND REL) (1002-01 NOT
COMPLT)
Release: Faithful Performance Bond
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond
$458,000.00
$ 45,800.00
RESOLUTION NO. 91-326
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13812 - ETIWANDA STORM DRAIN AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING
OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE
D25. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Letters of Credit and Notice
of Completion for Tract 13813, located on the west side of Hellman Avenue 900
feet south of 19th Street. (0405-04 BOND REL) (1002-01 NOT COMPLT)
Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit
$ 76,000.00
$ 7,600.00
RESOLUTION NO. 91-327
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13813 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D26. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion
for CUP 88-46, located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Base Line
Road. (0405-04 BOND REL) (1002-01 NOT COMPLT)
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $231,300.00
RESOLUTION' NO. 91-328
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
CUP 88-46AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
D27. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Letter of Credit and Notice of
Completion for DR 87-48, located on the south side of 9th Street between Hellman
Avenue and Archibald Avenue. (0405-04 BOND REL) (1002-01 NOT COMPLT)
Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit
$ 61,000.00
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 91-329
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
DR 87-48AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION
FOR THE WORK
D28. Approval to accept the Base Line Road Street Improvements, Storm Drain and
Traffic Signals Improvement Project, Contract No. 90-008, located from west of
Victoria Park Lane to West of Interstate 15, as complete, release bonds and
authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." (0405-04 BOND REL)
(1002-01 NOT COMPLT)
RESOLUTION NO. 91-330
A RESOLUTION OF THE .CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
BASE LINE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS, STORM DRAIN AND TRAFFIC
SIGNALS, CONTRACT NO. 90-008, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A
NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
D29. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12643 located on
the south side of Netherlands View Loop at Calico Peak Place and Antler Peak
Court. (0405-04 BOND REL)
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street)
$ 11,800.00
D30. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13556 located on
the east side of Sierra Crest View Loop at Mt. Harvard Court and Mt. Cambridge
Court. (0405-04 BOND REL)
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street)
$ 12,800.00
D31. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13557 located on
the east side of Sierra Crest View Loop at Mt. Sherman Court and Mt. Waverly
Court. (0405-04 BOND REL)
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street)
$ 10,050.00
D32. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13650, located on
the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Street. (0405-04 BOND REL)
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street)
$ 21,907.00
D33. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13810, located on
the north side of Hillside Road at Ram Court. (0405-04 BOND REL)
Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street)
$ 17,445.00
D34. Approval to confirm contribution in memory of Caryn DiIorio. (1130-01
DONATION)
(28)
(29)
(3o)
(32)
(33)
(34)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 10
(3s)
(36)
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent Calendar
as corrected. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
E. CONSENT ORDINANCES
El. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a request to amend Title 17,
Chapter 17.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to eliminate compact parking
spaces and reduce the standard size parking space to 9 feet by 18 feet. REMOVED
FOR DISCUSSION BY JOHN MELCHER. (0203-11DC AMEND)
ORDINANCE NO. 462 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
91-01, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.12 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, ELIMINATING COMPACT PARKING SPACES
AND REDUCING THE STANDARD SIZE PARKING SPACE TO 9 FEET BY 18
FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
E2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a request to amend
Part III of the Industrial Specific Plan to eliminate compact parking spaces.
REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY JOHN MELCHER. (0203-05 INDUS SP)
ORDINANCE NO. 463 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 91-01, ELIMINATING COMPACT PARKING SPACES, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
DISCUSSION OF ITEM El. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTANDDEVELOPMENT
CODE AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA - Consideration of a request to
amend Title 17, Chapter 17.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to eliminate
compact parking spaces and reduce the standard size parking space to 9 feet by
18 feet.
DISCUSSION OF ITEM E2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND INDUSTRIAL
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA - Consideration of a
request to amend Part III of the Industrial Specific Plan to eliminate compact
parking spaces.
John Melcher, 779 Treeline, felt the 8.5 foot width was adequate for
automobiles to park. He asked that the City Council consider having the
street maintenance people study this issue a little further before a
decision is made. He asked that the 9 foot width spaces go back to the
Planning Commission for further study to consider the alternatives.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 11
Kent Crowley, Chamber of Commerce, offered his services if the City
Council needed further study of this matter.
Michael Scandifio, 1510 Riverside, Burbank, stated he is working with Mr.
Masi to develop the property on the corner of Foothill and Rochester. He
thanked the Planning Commission for all of the work they have done in
helping him with his project, stating they have had many meetings and have
had a lot of assistance from the Planning Commission. He also thanked
City staff for their assistance.
Councilmember Williams interjected a question as to when would the building come
down, and if it is not coming down soon, when would it be painted.
Mr. Scandifio stated it would be painted within a week.
Councilmember Buquet asked Mr. Scandifio to give this building his personal
attention in trying to get the graffiti removed.
Mr. Scandifio stated that during the course of planning this project, the
Planning Commission has made several changes to the size of the parking
spaces, and now with the parking spaces being changed to 9 feet by 18
feet, they would have to change the design of their project. He asked the
Council to consider that any project that is currently in the process be
grandfathered into the Planning Commission's previous recommendation
instead of the 9 feet by 18 feet recommendation that the City Council had
previously made.
Joe Oleson, Lewis Homes, stated the City had been sent a letter from them
regarding this item. He added they wanted to go on record that the low
turnover parking spaces in a residential development be reconsidered. He
also added they had submitted a letter asking the Council to clarify the
intended application of the new multi-family design standards, which was
another item on the agenda which the Council would be considering at this
meeting.
Councilmember Williams stated she had not considered the multi-family element
when considering this item the first time. She felt there the two issues should
be kept separate, i.e., multi-family parking spaces versus shopping parking
spaces when considering an ordinance of this nature, or could they possibly go
on a site specific basis or go by the use of an area when considering parking
requirements.
Councilmember Buquet stated he is always getting complaints from residents about
compact parking spaces. He stated he agreed with the 9 feet by 18 feet.
Councilmember Alexander felt possibly a demonstration should take place to prove
what size is acceptable.
Councilmember Wright felt the City Council should be responsive to the
community's concerns and needs.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 12
(37)
(38)
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to continue Items E1 and E2 until
December 4, 1991 in order for further study to be done on this matter. Motion
carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
F1. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ADOPTION, BY REFERENCE, OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
ORDINANCE NO. 3349 AS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO PERTAINING TO THE VEHICLE ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL PROGRAM OF THE COUNTY
OF SAN BERNARDINO Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. (1301-01 VEH
ABAN
Mayor Pro Tem opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the public hearing was closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 460.
ORDINANCE NO. 460 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, ORDINANCE NO.
3349 OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PERTAINING TO THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF RULES, REGULATIONS, AND PROCEDURES FOR
PARTICIPATING IN THE VEHICLE ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL PROGRAM OF
THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, INCLUDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
CERTAIN FEES AND PENALTIES
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set
second reading of Ordinance No. 460 for November 20, 1991. Motion carried
unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
, , , , ,
F2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF MELLO-ROOS
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 (STAFF REQUESTS ITEM TO BE CONTINUED TO
NOVEMBER 20, 1991) (1120-03 COM FAC DI)
Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff is requesting that this item be continued
to November 20, 1991, but that the public hearing should be opened to allow
comments from those people that could not be present November 20th, and for those
that could be present on November 20th to hold their comments.
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. No response was
made at this time.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to continue the public hearing of
Item F2 until the November 20, 1991 meeting, which would be held in the City
Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
, , , , ,
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 13
F3. CONSIDERATION OF THE FORMATION OF DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 AND THE LEVY OF
ASSESSMENTS FOR COSTS OF MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS Staff report presented by
Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. (0401-20 DR 91-2)
Councilmember Wright asked questions about this assessment area and how it would
work. She stated she had a problem with this because we are doing something that
might have a negative effect on the home owner down the line, and that the
homeowner was not present tonight to make comments on this matter.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this is protection for the people upstream, as
well as for the tract in question. He stated this is unusual that the City does
not have anything like this.
Councilmember Wright stated what she sees the City doing is protecting the City's
interest without taking into consideration what the people paying for it might
think about it.
Councilmember Wright stated what she felt the issue was should the City help to
subsidize or help put the burden on the property owners in the future by letting
the developer out of their responsibility and developing a piece of land before
it is time for it to be developed. She stated she felt five to ten years down
the road the maintenance costs would be escalating and people would be wondering
how they got put into this position to begin with, and how the City helped the
developer get out of providing the infrastructure because they wanted to develop
the land before it was time.
Councilmember Buquet stated he was not sure he was ready to go forward with this
item tonight. He felt the Public Works Subcommittee should possibly work on this
further.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet to continue this item to November 20, 1991. The item
was seconded by Councilmember Williams.
It was pointed out at this time by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, that this
particular item was tied in to two previous items that the Council had already
voted on.
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander stated he was not aware of this and asked Councilmember
Williams if she could withdraw the second on the motion she had made so that
further discussion could take place.
James Markman, Cit'y Attorney, stated this presented some difficulties since the
Council had approved a map that provides for the improvements through this
mechanism. From the developer's point of view, it is also part of his pro forma,
his financial plans, and this is a routine item to affect this financing
mechanism to build the improvements so they are tied together. He did not know
how the developer would feel about the approval or the conditions, and there was
another project approved by the Redevelopment Agency that was tied into this.
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander stated he felt Councilmember Wright brought up some areas
of concern, but felt it was probably the best idea to go ahead and approve the
resolution.
(39)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 14
(40)
James Markman, City Attorney, stated the City generated this, and it is not just
the cost of the improvements, because they would be borne by the area and they
are spread according to benefit, but while they City may require this
installation, that property would be off the hook on the maintenance costs, which
are estimated at over $30,000.00 per year. He stated that will fall in the
General Fund, and that is the other alternative. He stated this is not a
condition that one could say is a developer oriented condition, and it might
require some rethinking of the project.
Councilmember Buquet felt if there were items that were being considered on an
agenda that are related, that it should be pointed out to the City Council ahead
of time.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated he did not know if this was always possible
because there are times when items may be on the agendas that are related, but
may not be heard for months apart.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this could have been built as a public facility
and maintained by the City.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-331
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR
A DRAINAGE AREA
MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 91-
331. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander called a recess at 8:45 p.m. The meeting was reconvened
at 9:00 p.m. with all members of Council present (Stout absent).
F4. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-
04A, AIR QUALITY ELEMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - In accordance with the 1989
Air Quality Management Plan, and Air Quality Element has been prepared for
inclusion as part of Chapter V, Public Health and Safety section, of the Rancho
Cucamonga General Plan. The amendment includes the expansion of the goals,
objectives, and policies of the Air Quality, Circulation, Energy, and
Implementation sections of the General Plan including provisions of the 1989 Air
Quality Management Plan, as adopted by the South Coast Air Quality Management
District and the Southern California Association of Governments. Staff report
presented by Alan Warren, Associate Planner. (0203-03 GP AMEN)
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no
response, the public hearing was closed.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 15
RESOLUTION NO. 91-332
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91-
04A, FOR INCLUSION OF AN AIR'QUALITY ELEMENT AS PART OF
CHAPTER V, HEALTH AND SAFETY SECTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
GENERAL PLAN, AND TO EXPAND THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND
POLICIES OF THE AIR QUALITY, CIRCULATION, ENERGY, AND
IMPLEMENTATION SECTIONS OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright approve Resolution No. 91-332.
Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
F5. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
91-03 - CITY OF HANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Section 17.08,040P and
Section 17.08,070E to the Development Code establishing property maintenance
standards and ongoing maintenance requirements for Multiple-Family Dwellings.
Staff report presented by Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor. (0203-11
DC AMEND)
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no
response, the public hearing was closed.
Councilmember Buquet stated he felt when the City works with developers on new
projects, that it is not made so difficult for someone who will be maintaining
the unit to do a good job in the maintenance of them.
Councilmen~er Wright asked if there was something to require the posting of
maintenance guidelines.
Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor, stated there was nothing to require
that.
Councilmember Wright asked that if it did turn out to be a problem with the
maintenance of units, is there something that could be done to go back and amend
the City's ordinance so that some type of posting for maintenance requirements
would be required.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this could be done through an amendment to the
ordinance.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 464.
ORDINANCE NO. 464(first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
91-03, ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 17.08.040-P AND A NEW
SUBSECTION 17.08,070-E TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 16
(42)
PERTAINING TO PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS AND ONGOING
MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to waive full reading and set second
reading of Ordinance No. 464 for November 20, 1991. Motion carried unanimously,
4-0-1 (Stout absent).
F6. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development
standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts. Staff
recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Staff report presented by Nancy
Fong, Sr. Planner. (0203-11 DC AMEND)
Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner, pointed out a correction to the attachments of the staff
report, as to page 364, stating that a corrected copy of this had been given to
the City Clerk.
Councilmember Buquet asked how they would enforce an area that was designated as
visitor parking within a multi-family dwelling unit complex to remain as visitor
parking.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the same conditions would apply as was for the
maintenance standards in the item previously discussed. He stated if there was
a problem as far as keeping the visitor parking area only used as visitor
parking, there could be further restrictions enforced to help this problem if it
did occur.
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the
City Council was:
Joe Oleson, Lewis Homes, stated they had participatee in this process and
supported the final product that was before the City Council. He referred
to a letter he had sent to the City Council last week, which was dated
October 31, 1991, and continued to outline various points in his letter.
He asked that there be a policy clarification given, because staff had
consistently stated that the new standards would not be applied to
projects that have previously been approved, i.e., with tentative tract
map and design review approvals; however, it has been suggested that if
extensions of approvals are requested, then some or all of the new
standards may be applied.
Councilmember Wright asked for Mr. Markman to comment on this.
James Markman, City Attorney, stated the idea was to humanely apply the changes
so that if someone has gone all the way through the process, as long as those
approvals remain in existence and do not expire, they could act in accordance
with the standards by which they processed their plans. He stated on page 362
it had language that would lock in present standards for any residential
subdivision where a tentative map in design review has been approved prior to the
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 17
effective date of the ordinance. He stated if something was approved at the
Planning Commission level, but were to come to the Council on an appeal, and then
was caught in between the effective date of the ordinance, that would not be an
approval and should be understood. He stated it was only the projects that were
finally approved through the discretionary process by the time the ordinance
becomes effective that would be allowed to apply the standards that pre-existed.
Councilmember Wright asked if Section 5 should read "and/or."
James Markman, City Attorney, felt that "and/or" would be better. If there was
a non-subdivision that was a multi-family project that came through, and it went
through Design Review and all the way through the discretionary process, the
intent is to create it the same way and not make them re-do it if they do not
build before the effective date of the ordinance, based on final approval.
Brad Buller, City Planner, added that there was a gentleman that would also like
to speak regarding a residential application that he has submitted.
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the question Mr. Oleson has is also a
question that he brought before the Commission, which was what was the effective
date of this ordinance on projects that have not been approved. He stated Mr.
Oleson's concern was since everyone is in a recession stage and development is
occurring at a slower pace, is there a possibility that the wording be arranged
such that the life of the project, with the extension permitted by code, be
allowed to go by the previously approved conditions instead of this new
condition.
James Markman, City Attorney, brought up the fact of how could the Council grant
an extension on a previously approved project and not have them continue with the
previously approved standards, and felt wording should be added into this
ordinance to accommodate that.
James Markman, City Attorney, suggested that Section 5 of the ordinance read as
follows: "The provisions of this Ordinance shall not apply to those residential
subdivisions wherein a Tentative Map and/or Design Review has been approved prior
to the effective date of this Ordinance. The approval shall include the time
extension as allowed by Section 17.02.100 of the Development Code and as modified
from time to time."
James Markman, City Attorney, also suggested that Section 5 of Ordinances 466 and
467 also include the recommended changes.
Councilmember Buquet felt that this exception should only apply to projects that
have been previously approved.
Khosroo Esfahlani, informed the City Council about his proposed project
and how staff has dealt with him in coming to a solution between he and
his neighbor regarding his driveway. He added he has worked on this a
very long time and is now disturbed that the code is changing after
working on this project for such a long time. He added he had not
received approval yet and did not think he would be treated fairly if
these new conditions would be made to apply to him.
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 18
(43)
(44)
Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that he did not completely agree with all of
Mr. Esfahlani's comments.
Councilmember Buquet suggested that possibly there be stipulations made that if
a person is so far along in getting their approvals for their project, that the
new guidelines may not have to apply. He suggested that a Subcommittee work on
this for the eleven projects that are currently in the pipeline of getting
approval.
Mayor Pro Alexander stated he concurred with Councilmember Buquet's suggestion.
James Markman, City Attorney, cautioned the City Council on this suggestion.
Pete Pitassi, 9267 Base Line, stated he has worked on this process,
stating he also is representing the smaller multiple-family dwelling
units. He expressed his concern for the clarification on Section 5 also.
He stated that he agreed with Councilmember Buquet's previous suggestion.
There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance Nos. 465, 466 and 467.
ORDINANCE NO. 465 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
91-02, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL
CODE, REGARDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN
GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND RAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND TERRAVISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY
AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various
development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential
districts within the Terra Vista Planned Community area. Staff recommends
issuance of a Negative Declaration. (0203-05 TVCP AMEN)
ORDINANCE NO. 466 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRAVISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY
AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND
dESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY
AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various
development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential
districts within the Victoria Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance
of a Negative Declaration. (0203-05 VCP AMEN)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 19
ORDINANCE NO. 467 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R/LNCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PL/LNNED COMMUNITY
-AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND
MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Wright to waive full reading of Ordinance
Nos. 465, 466 and 467. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded'by Buquet to set second reading of Ordinance
Nos. 465, 466 and 467 for November 20, 1991, as amended. Motion carried 3-1-1
(Wright no; Stout absent).
G. PUBLIC HEARINGS
G1. CONSIDERATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON HILLSIDE ROAD FROM
ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, 40 MPH ON MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE FROM SPRUCE
AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 35 MPH ON FREDERICKSBURG AND CANISTEL AVENUES FROM
BANYAN STREET TO WILSON AVENUE Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager.
(1141-10 SPEED ZON)
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the
City Council was:
Helen Magaha, Vicksburg Street, stated she agreed with staff's
recommendation.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 468.
ORDINANCE NO. 468 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS
ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to waive full reading and set second
reading of Ordinance No. 468 for November 20, 1991. Motion carried 3-0-2
(Williams, Stout absent).
G2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 89-1 Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City
Manager. (0401-20 AD 89-1)
(45)
(46)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 20
(47)
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the
City Council was:
Jim Westling, who thanked the City staff for working with him on this
project.
There being no further response, the public hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION NO. 91-333
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON THE "REPORT" OF THE
ENGINEER, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING A TIME AND
PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
RESOLUTION NO. 91-334
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE PROPOSED
BOUNDARIES OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
RESOLUTION NO. 91-335
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE
INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT; DECLARING THE WORKTO BE MORE THANLOCAL OR ORDINARY
BENEFIT; DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE
COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
BONDS
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution Nos. 91-333,
91-334 and 91-335. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent).
H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS
H1. CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT THE DRAFT CONGESTIONMANAGEMENT PLANAS PRESENTED
TO THE BOARD OF THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS IN THEIR ROLE AS
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AND AS EXPLAINED IN THE
ACCOMPANYING REPORT Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. (1160-00
TRAFFIC)
ACTION: Report received and filed.
, , , , ,
No Items Submitted.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 21
J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR MEXT MEETING
J1. Councilmember Buquet suggested that the Jack Benny Statue matter be
discussed at the December 4, 1991 City Council meeting.
K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
K1. REOUEST FROM ROBERT OLARI TO SPEAK REGARDING THE PARK AND RECREATION
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 20, 1991
(0401-12 FEES}
Robert Olari, 9637 Manzanita, asked if the Cost Recovery item which was
scheduled to be heard at the November 20, 1991 City Council meeting could
be delayed. He stated he did not agree with the Griffith Study and felt
there should be workshops scheduled so that the City Council could get a
better feeling of the community's feelings.
Mayor Pro Tem Alexander stated he did not think this should be delayed and felt
if there were people who want to express their concerns with the study, or the
increases, they can do so at the November 20th meeting, whereby a decision could
be made at that time to possibly have additional workshops or approve the fees
as proposed.
Councilmember Buquet stated he felt the process should go through on the November
20th City Council agenda and did not feel anyone would benefit from having
additional workshops.
ACTION: It was decided that the Council Subcommittee of Buquet and Williams
would arrange for a meeting to be held with Mr. Olari to discuss before the
November 20th Council meeting some of his concerns regarding this matter.
K2.
Primo Morales, president of Rancho Little League, asked the Council if his
group could be given the same consideration in relation to the fees as was
given to the equestrian programs.
Councilmember Buquet stated he felt there was a little more to it than Mr.
Morales was aware of, but that he would be given the opportunity to give more
input at the November 20th public hearing.
Councilmember Wright felt the equestr'ian issue was something that needed to be
addressed at the November 20th meeting.
K3.
Phil Deatherage, 6564 Etiwanda Avenue, asked when the Rochester and Arrow
intersection would be opened up.
Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, felt it would hopefully be opened up in one to two
months.
(48)
City Council Minutes
November 6, 1991
Page 22
L. ADJOURNMEN~
MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Williams to adjourn the meeting to
Executive Session to discuss pending litigation regardingAmerican Insurance and
University Crest. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). The meeting
adjourned at 11:08 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
~ds~,CM~
City Clerk
Approved: December 18, 1991