Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/11/06 - Minutes November 6, 1991 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ReQular MeetinQ A. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga was held on Wednesday, November 6, 1991, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:23 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander. Present were Councilmembers: Charles J. Buquet II, Diane Williams, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, Deputy City Manager; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Tarry Smith, Park Planning/Development Superintendent; Brad Buller, City Planner; Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner; Alan Warren, Associate Planner; Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Paul Rougeau, Traffic Engineer; Dan James, Sr. Civil Engineer; Mike Olivier, Sr. Civil Engineer; Joe Schultz, Community Services Director; Susan Neely, Finance Officer; Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Lt. Joe Henry, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was: Mayor Dennis L. Stout, who was out of town on City business. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Councilmember Wright stated she and Councilmember Williams were at a Gangs and Drugs Task Force meeting earlier in the day, and stated the City's C.H.O.I.C.E.S. program was spotlighted. B2. Councilmember Williams also commented on the program, stating that now it is planned to be expanded, whereby other jurisdictions are wanting the program in their area. She added that she, too, is very proud of the fact that Rancho Cucamonga was being spotlighted for this. , , , , , , City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 2 C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC Cl. Steven Carroll, 10801 Lemon, brought up the fact that pornographic material is displayed too publicly in various commercial establishments. He stated he had worked with Duane Baker on this, and that the pornographic material is being moved to the back of a local store, as was requested, in order to get it out of public view. Mr. Carroll was requesting there be developed a "blinder rack" ordinance adopted by the City to keep pornographic material from being displayed from the front of a store. Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager, added there is not an ordinance at the present time regarding this, but that most stores do cooperate with the City if asked to move pornographic material to another location within the store. Councilmember Buquet felt if the City was having problems with getting stores to comply with the City's request to move the material, then at that time he could see going ahead with developing an ordinance, but thought that an ordinance was not really necessary at this time since the business owners are complying with the City's request. Mr. Carroll felt Rancho Cucamonga was a very clean community. C2. Jim Holland, 5915 San Sevaine, of the Huntington Estates, felt Summit was unsafe where it goes from two lanes to one. He asked the Council when both sides of the highway might be open to the public. He stated he also had a concern about the bridle trail as to its design, and when construction would start. He stated he also had questions regarding the assessments in his area. Jack Lam, City Manager, referred Mr. Holland to Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, and Brad Buller, City Planner, to get his questions answered. C3. Terry Marquez, 8256 London, brought up the statue of Jack Benny article she had recently read in the newspaper. She stated she did not know what Jack Benny had done for the community in order to warrant this statue. She stated she had a petition from over 100 residents who did not think the Jack Benny statue should be in front of City Hall. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated this has not come to the City Council for a decision, that this was an idea of a private party to make this statue of Jack Benny. Councilmember Buquet added the City Council has not discussed this nor decided on it at this time. , , , , , D. CONSENT CALENDAR Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Item D4 has a new resolution with an expiration date of November 8, 1991. City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 3 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated Item D14 had an incorrect name as far as the awarding of the contract, and stated the item should read "awarded to R.G. Construction", instead of "K.E.C. Construction." D1. Approval of Minutes: October 16, 1991 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 10/16/91 and 10/23/91 and Payroll ending 10/10/91 for the total amount of $1,881,310.79. D3. Approval to authorize the Advertising of the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the Haven Avenue Improvements at the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad crossing (P.U.C. No. 2-96.7), to be funded from Systems Development Fund, Account No. 22- 4637-8851. (0601-01 BID) RESOLUTION NO. 91-314 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS AT THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD CROSSING (P.U.C. NO. 2-96.7), IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS D4. Approval of Resolution No. 91-012F to extend Comcast Cablevision's Franchise. (1205-01CATV) RESOLUTION NO. 91-012F A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FRANCHISE LICENSE WITH COMCAST CABLE T.V. FOR 90 DAYS UPON EXPIRATION OF CURRENT LICENSE WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D5. Approval to destroy records and documents which are no longer required as provided under Government Code Section 34090. (0304-00 REC MGMT) RESOLUTION NO. 91-315 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF CITY RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED AS PROVIDED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 34090 D6. Approval to authorize the assignment of an Adult Crossing Guard at the intersection of Bougainvillea Court and Peach Place for Windrows Elementary School. (1301-05 CROS GUARD) D7. Approval of a Resolution supporting a Ballot Measure to repeal Booking Fees authorized by SB 2557. (0401-12 FEES) (i) (2) (3) (4) (s) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 4 (6) (7) (8) (9) RESOLUTION NO. 91-316 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING A BALLOT MEASURE TO REPEAL BOOKING FEES AUTHORIZED BY SB 2557 D8. Approval to summarily vacate Orchard Avenue from Terra Vista Parkway east to approximately 220 feet southwesterly requested by Lewis Homes of California - APN: 227-151-27. (1110-18 VACATE ST) RESOLUTION NO. 91-317 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF ORCHARD AVENUE FROM TERRAVISTA PARKWAY EAST TO APPROXIMATELY 220 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY - APN: 227-151-27 D9. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the proposed Vinmar Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to the Chaffey Street alley and issuance of a categorical exemption therefore. (1403-06 EIS) RESOLUTION NO. 91-318 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED VINMARAVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO THE CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY D10. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the proposed Calaveras Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to the Chaffey Street Alley and issuance of a categorical exemption therefore. (1403-06 EIS) RESOLUTION NO. 91-319 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED CALAVERAS AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO THE CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY Dll. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the proposed Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Project from Ninth Street to 310 feet south of Chaffey Street alley and issuance of a categorical exemption therefore. (1403-06 EIS) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 91-320 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED SIERRA MADRE AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FROM NINTH STREET TO 310 FEET SOUTH OF CHAFFEY STREET ALLEY D12. Approval of the Environmental Initial Study, Parts I and II, for the proposed Rochester Avenue Street Improvement and Traffic Signal Projects from Victoria Park Lane to Highland Avenue and issuance of a categorical exemption therefore. (1403-06 EIS) RESOLUTION NO. 91-321 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY AND ISSUANCE OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION FOR THE PROPOSED ROCHESTER AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECTS FROM VICTORIA PARK LANE TO HIGHLAND AVENUE D13. Approval of Map, subject to fulfillment of the Conditions of approval and normal processing to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney, for Parcel Map 13724, located on the south side of Foothill Boulevard between Interstate 15 and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Foothill Marketplace Partners. (1002-09 MAP) RESOLUTION NO. 91-322 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP 13724 AND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, WITH THE RECORDATION OF SAID MAP SUBJECT TO FULFILLMENT OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, SUBMITTAL OF SECURITIES, AND NORMAL PROCESSING TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER AND CITY ATTORNEY D14. Approval to award and authorization for execution of contract (CO 91-074) for Sierra Madre Avenue Street Improvement Project, located from Arrow Route to Ninth Street to K.E.C. Construction for the amount of $159,524.00 ($145,022.00 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Community Block Grant Account No. 28- 4333-8951. (0511-01 AWARD) (0602-01 CONTRACT) D15. Approval of Consultant Contract (CO 91-075) for Day Creek Mello-Roos District (84-1) Refinancing to Stone & Youngberg. (0602-01 CONTRACT) D16. Approval of Disposition of excess property for a portion of 25th Street, located west of Etiwanda Avenue (APN: 225-082-01). (0604-02 SURPL SAL) (io) (ii) (i2) (is) (14) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. 91-295 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO BE SURPLUS AND A BURDEN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAAND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE HAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN DEED, A COPY OF WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "A" AND TO CAUSE THE SAME TO BE DELIVERED TO THE PERSONS NAMED THEREIN D17. Approval of Map, execution of Pre-Condemnation Agreement, Maintenance Agreement for on-site temporary detention basin, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for on-site public improvements for Tract 14139, Joint Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities with Ahmanson Developments and Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated, for off-site improvements for Tract Nos. 14139, 14379 and 14380, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. i and 7 for Tract 14139 located on the southwest corner of 25th Street and Etiwanda Avenue, submitted by Ahmanson Developments. (1002-09MAP) (0602-01 AGREE IMPR) (0401-026 LNSCAPE MD) (1120-01 ST LT MD) RESOLUTION NO. 91-296 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND THE FINAL MAP OF TRACT 14139 RESOLUTION NO. 91-297 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT 14139 D18. Approval of Map, execution of Pre-Condemnation Agreement, Maintenance Agreement for on-site temporary detention basin, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities for on-site public improvements for Tracts 14379 and 14380 (Tentative Tract 13527), Joint Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities with Watt Inland Empire and Ahmanson Developments for off-site improvements for Tract Nos. 14379, 14380 and 14139, ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 7 for Tract Nos. 14379, 14380, located on the north side of 24th street, west of Etiwanda Avenue submitted by Watt Inland Empire, Incorporated. (1002-09 HAP) (0602-01 AGREE IMPR) (0401-26 LNSCAPE MD) (1120-01 ST LT MD) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 91-298 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PRE-CONDEMNATION AGREEMENT, MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR ON-SITE TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, JOINT IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND SECURITIES AND FINAL MAPS OF TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 RESOLUTION NO. 91r299 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 14379 AND 14380 D19. Approval of Terra Vista Street Capping Agreement submitted by Lewis Development Company, Lewis Homes of California, and Western Land Properties. (0602-01 CONTRACT) D20. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13566-3, located on the southwest corner of Summit Avenue and San Sevaine Avenue, submitted by Century American. (0602-01 AGREE EXTN) RESOLUTION NO. 91-323 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13566-3 D21. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for CUP 88-18, located on the east side of Haven Avenue between Lemon Avenue and Highland Avenue, submitted by Diversified Properties Company. (0602-01 AGREE EXTN) RESOLUTION NO. 91-324 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 88-18 D22. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 11838, located on the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane, submitted by the William Lyon Company. (0602-01 AGREE EXTN) RESOLUTION NO. 91-325 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 11838 (i7) (i9) (2o) (22) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 8 (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) D23. Approval to accept Landscaped Pedestrian Trail adjacent to Tract 13440. (1404-08 TRAILS) D24. Approval to accept Storm Drain Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 13812 - Etiwanda Storm Drain, located on Etiwanda Avenue between Highland Avenue and Summit Avenue. (0405-04 BOND REL) (1002-01 NOT COMPLT) Release: Faithful Performance Bond Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond $458,000.00 $ 45,800.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-326 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13812 - ETIWANDA STORM DRAIN AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORE D25. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Letters of Credit and Notice of Completion for Tract 13813, located on the west side of Hellman Avenue 900 feet south of 19th Street. (0405-04 BOND REL) (1002-01 NOT COMPLT) Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Letter of Credit $ 76,000.00 $ 7,600.00 RESOLUTION NO. 91-327 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 13813 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D26. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for CUP 88-46, located on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and Base Line Road. (0405-04 BOND REL) (1002-01 NOT COMPLT) Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $231,300.00 RESOLUTION' NO. 91-328 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR CUP 88-46AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D27. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Letter of Credit and Notice of Completion for DR 87-48, located on the south side of 9th Street between Hellman Avenue and Archibald Avenue. (0405-04 BOND REL) (1002-01 NOT COMPLT) Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit $ 61,000.00 City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 91-329 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DR 87-48AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D28. Approval to accept the Base Line Road Street Improvements, Storm Drain and Traffic Signals Improvement Project, Contract No. 90-008, located from west of Victoria Park Lane to West of Interstate 15, as complete, release bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." (0405-04 BOND REL) (1002-01 NOT COMPLT) RESOLUTION NO. 91-330 A RESOLUTION OF THE .CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR BASE LINE ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS, STORM DRAIN AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS, CONTRACT NO. 90-008, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D29. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 12643 located on the south side of Netherlands View Loop at Calico Peak Place and Antler Peak Court. (0405-04 BOND REL) Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 11,800.00 D30. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13556 located on the east side of Sierra Crest View Loop at Mt. Harvard Court and Mt. Cambridge Court. (0405-04 BOND REL) Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 12,800.00 D31. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13557 located on the east side of Sierra Crest View Loop at Mt. Sherman Court and Mt. Waverly Court. (0405-04 BOND REL) Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 10,050.00 D32. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13650, located on the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Baker Street. (0405-04 BOND REL) Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 21,907.00 D33. Approval to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13810, located on the north side of Hillside Road at Ram Court. (0405-04 BOND REL) Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 17,445.00 D34. Approval to confirm contribution in memory of Caryn DiIorio. (1130-01 DONATION) (28) (29) (3o) (32) (33) (34) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 10 (3s) (36) MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to approve the Consent Calendar as corrected. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a request to amend Title 17, Chapter 17.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to eliminate compact parking spaces and reduce the standard size parking space to 9 feet by 18 feet. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY JOHN MELCHER. (0203-11DC AMEND) ORDINANCE NO. 462 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01, AMENDING TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17.12 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, ELIMINATING COMPACT PARKING SPACES AND REDUCING THE STANDARD SIZE PARKING SPACE TO 9 FEET BY 18 FEET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF E2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of a request to amend Part III of the Industrial Specific Plan to eliminate compact parking spaces. REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY JOHN MELCHER. (0203-05 INDUS SP) ORDINANCE NO. 463 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01, ELIMINATING COMPACT PARKING SPACES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF DISCUSSION OF ITEM El. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTANDDEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA - Consideration of a request to amend Title 17, Chapter 17.12 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to eliminate compact parking spaces and reduce the standard size parking space to 9 feet by 18 feet. DISCUSSION OF ITEM E2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 91-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA - Consideration of a request to amend Part III of the Industrial Specific Plan to eliminate compact parking spaces. John Melcher, 779 Treeline, felt the 8.5 foot width was adequate for automobiles to park. He asked that the City Council consider having the street maintenance people study this issue a little further before a decision is made. He asked that the 9 foot width spaces go back to the Planning Commission for further study to consider the alternatives. City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 11 Kent Crowley, Chamber of Commerce, offered his services if the City Council needed further study of this matter. Michael Scandifio, 1510 Riverside, Burbank, stated he is working with Mr. Masi to develop the property on the corner of Foothill and Rochester. He thanked the Planning Commission for all of the work they have done in helping him with his project, stating they have had many meetings and have had a lot of assistance from the Planning Commission. He also thanked City staff for their assistance. Councilmember Williams interjected a question as to when would the building come down, and if it is not coming down soon, when would it be painted. Mr. Scandifio stated it would be painted within a week. Councilmember Buquet asked Mr. Scandifio to give this building his personal attention in trying to get the graffiti removed. Mr. Scandifio stated that during the course of planning this project, the Planning Commission has made several changes to the size of the parking spaces, and now with the parking spaces being changed to 9 feet by 18 feet, they would have to change the design of their project. He asked the Council to consider that any project that is currently in the process be grandfathered into the Planning Commission's previous recommendation instead of the 9 feet by 18 feet recommendation that the City Council had previously made. Joe Oleson, Lewis Homes, stated the City had been sent a letter from them regarding this item. He added they wanted to go on record that the low turnover parking spaces in a residential development be reconsidered. He also added they had submitted a letter asking the Council to clarify the intended application of the new multi-family design standards, which was another item on the agenda which the Council would be considering at this meeting. Councilmember Williams stated she had not considered the multi-family element when considering this item the first time. She felt there the two issues should be kept separate, i.e., multi-family parking spaces versus shopping parking spaces when considering an ordinance of this nature, or could they possibly go on a site specific basis or go by the use of an area when considering parking requirements. Councilmember Buquet stated he is always getting complaints from residents about compact parking spaces. He stated he agreed with the 9 feet by 18 feet. Councilmember Alexander felt possibly a demonstration should take place to prove what size is acceptable. Councilmember Wright felt the City Council should be responsive to the community's concerns and needs. City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 12 (37) (38) MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to continue Items E1 and E2 until December 4, 1991 in order for further study to be done on this matter. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED ADOPTION, BY REFERENCE, OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 3349 AS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PERTAINING TO THE VEHICLE ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL PROGRAM OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. (1301-01 VEH ABAN Mayor Pro Tem opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 460. ORDINANCE NO. 460 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING, BY REFERENCE, ORDINANCE NO. 3349 OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PERTAINING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF RULES, REGULATIONS, AND PROCEDURES FOR PARTICIPATING IN THE VEHICLE ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL PROGRAM OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, INCLUDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CERTAIN FEES AND PENALTIES MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 460 for November 20, 1991. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). , , , , , F2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 91-1 (STAFF REQUESTS ITEM TO BE CONTINUED TO NOVEMBER 20, 1991) (1120-03 COM FAC DI) Jack Lam, City Manager, stated staff is requesting that this item be continued to November 20, 1991, but that the public hearing should be opened to allow comments from those people that could not be present November 20th, and for those that could be present on November 20th to hold their comments. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. No response was made at this time. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to continue the public hearing of Item F2 until the November 20, 1991 meeting, which would be held in the City Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). , , , , , City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 13 F3. CONSIDERATION OF THE FORMATION OF DRAINAGE AREA NO. 91-2 AND THE LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR COSTS OF MAINTENANCE AND IMPROVEMENTS Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. (0401-20 DR 91-2) Councilmember Wright asked questions about this assessment area and how it would work. She stated she had a problem with this because we are doing something that might have a negative effect on the home owner down the line, and that the homeowner was not present tonight to make comments on this matter. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this is protection for the people upstream, as well as for the tract in question. He stated this is unusual that the City does not have anything like this. Councilmember Wright stated what she sees the City doing is protecting the City's interest without taking into consideration what the people paying for it might think about it. Councilmember Wright stated what she felt the issue was should the City help to subsidize or help put the burden on the property owners in the future by letting the developer out of their responsibility and developing a piece of land before it is time for it to be developed. She stated she felt five to ten years down the road the maintenance costs would be escalating and people would be wondering how they got put into this position to begin with, and how the City helped the developer get out of providing the infrastructure because they wanted to develop the land before it was time. Councilmember Buquet stated he was not sure he was ready to go forward with this item tonight. He felt the Public Works Subcommittee should possibly work on this further. MOTION: Moved by Buquet to continue this item to November 20, 1991. The item was seconded by Councilmember Williams. It was pointed out at this time by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, that this particular item was tied in to two previous items that the Council had already voted on. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander stated he was not aware of this and asked Councilmember Williams if she could withdraw the second on the motion she had made so that further discussion could take place. James Markman, Cit'y Attorney, stated this presented some difficulties since the Council had approved a map that provides for the improvements through this mechanism. From the developer's point of view, it is also part of his pro forma, his financial plans, and this is a routine item to affect this financing mechanism to build the improvements so they are tied together. He did not know how the developer would feel about the approval or the conditions, and there was another project approved by the Redevelopment Agency that was tied into this. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander stated he felt Councilmember Wright brought up some areas of concern, but felt it was probably the best idea to go ahead and approve the resolution. (39) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 14 (40) James Markman, City Attorney, stated the City generated this, and it is not just the cost of the improvements, because they would be borne by the area and they are spread according to benefit, but while they City may require this installation, that property would be off the hook on the maintenance costs, which are estimated at over $30,000.00 per year. He stated that will fall in the General Fund, and that is the other alternative. He stated this is not a condition that one could say is a developer oriented condition, and it might require some rethinking of the project. Councilmember Buquet felt if there were items that were being considered on an agenda that are related, that it should be pointed out to the City Council ahead of time. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he did not know if this was always possible because there are times when items may be on the agendas that are related, but may not be heard for months apart. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated this could have been built as a public facility and maintained by the City. RESOLUTION NO. 91-331 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ANNUAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS FOR A DRAINAGE AREA MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to approve Resolution No. 91- 331. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). Mayor Pro Tem Alexander called a recess at 8:45 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:00 p.m. with all members of Council present (Stout absent). F4. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91- 04A, AIR QUALITY ELEMENT - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - In accordance with the 1989 Air Quality Management Plan, and Air Quality Element has been prepared for inclusion as part of Chapter V, Public Health and Safety section, of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The amendment includes the expansion of the goals, objectives, and policies of the Air Quality, Circulation, Energy, and Implementation sections of the General Plan including provisions of the 1989 Air Quality Management Plan, as adopted by the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the Southern California Association of Governments. Staff report presented by Alan Warren, Associate Planner. (0203-03 GP AMEN) Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 15 RESOLUTION NO. 91-332 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 91- 04A, FOR INCLUSION OF AN AIR'QUALITY ELEMENT AS PART OF CHAPTER V, HEALTH AND SAFETY SECTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN, AND TO EXPAND THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES OF THE AIR QUALITY, CIRCULATION, ENERGY, AND IMPLEMENTATION SECTIONS OF THE GENERAL PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright approve Resolution No. 91-332. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). F5. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03 - CITY OF HANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to add Section 17.08,040P and Section 17.08,070E to the Development Code establishing property maintenance standards and ongoing maintenance requirements for Multiple-Family Dwellings. Staff report presented by Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor. (0203-11 DC AMEND) Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Buquet stated he felt when the City works with developers on new projects, that it is not made so difficult for someone who will be maintaining the unit to do a good job in the maintenance of them. Councilmen~er Wright asked if there was something to require the posting of maintenance guidelines. Richard Alcorn, Code Enforcement Supervisor, stated there was nothing to require that. Councilmember Wright asked that if it did turn out to be a problem with the maintenance of units, is there something that could be done to go back and amend the City's ordinance so that some type of posting for maintenance requirements would be required. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated this could be done through an amendment to the ordinance. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 464. ORDINANCE NO. 464(first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-03, ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION 17.08.040-P AND A NEW SUBSECTION 17.08,070-E TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 16 (42) PERTAINING TO PROPERTY MAINTENANCE STANDARDS AND ONGOING MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTIPLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 464 for November 20, 1991. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). F6. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. Staff report presented by Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner. (0203-11 DC AMEND) Nancy Fong, Sr. Planner, pointed out a correction to the attachments of the staff report, as to page 364, stating that a corrected copy of this had been given to the City Clerk. Councilmember Buquet asked how they would enforce an area that was designated as visitor parking within a multi-family dwelling unit complex to remain as visitor parking. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated the same conditions would apply as was for the maintenance standards in the item previously discussed. He stated if there was a problem as far as keeping the visitor parking area only used as visitor parking, there could be further restrictions enforced to help this problem if it did occur. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Joe Oleson, Lewis Homes, stated they had participatee in this process and supported the final product that was before the City Council. He referred to a letter he had sent to the City Council last week, which was dated October 31, 1991, and continued to outline various points in his letter. He asked that there be a policy clarification given, because staff had consistently stated that the new standards would not be applied to projects that have previously been approved, i.e., with tentative tract map and design review approvals; however, it has been suggested that if extensions of approvals are requested, then some or all of the new standards may be applied. Councilmember Wright asked for Mr. Markman to comment on this. James Markman, City Attorney, stated the idea was to humanely apply the changes so that if someone has gone all the way through the process, as long as those approvals remain in existence and do not expire, they could act in accordance with the standards by which they processed their plans. He stated on page 362 it had language that would lock in present standards for any residential subdivision where a tentative map in design review has been approved prior to the City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 17 effective date of the ordinance. He stated if something was approved at the Planning Commission level, but were to come to the Council on an appeal, and then was caught in between the effective date of the ordinance, that would not be an approval and should be understood. He stated it was only the projects that were finally approved through the discretionary process by the time the ordinance becomes effective that would be allowed to apply the standards that pre-existed. Councilmember Wright asked if Section 5 should read "and/or." James Markman, City Attorney, felt that "and/or" would be better. If there was a non-subdivision that was a multi-family project that came through, and it went through Design Review and all the way through the discretionary process, the intent is to create it the same way and not make them re-do it if they do not build before the effective date of the ordinance, based on final approval. Brad Buller, City Planner, added that there was a gentleman that would also like to speak regarding a residential application that he has submitted. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the question Mr. Oleson has is also a question that he brought before the Commission, which was what was the effective date of this ordinance on projects that have not been approved. He stated Mr. Oleson's concern was since everyone is in a recession stage and development is occurring at a slower pace, is there a possibility that the wording be arranged such that the life of the project, with the extension permitted by code, be allowed to go by the previously approved conditions instead of this new condition. James Markman, City Attorney, brought up the fact of how could the Council grant an extension on a previously approved project and not have them continue with the previously approved standards, and felt wording should be added into this ordinance to accommodate that. James Markman, City Attorney, suggested that Section 5 of the ordinance read as follows: "The provisions of this Ordinance shall not apply to those residential subdivisions wherein a Tentative Map and/or Design Review has been approved prior to the effective date of this Ordinance. The approval shall include the time extension as allowed by Section 17.02.100 of the Development Code and as modified from time to time." James Markman, City Attorney, also suggested that Section 5 of Ordinances 466 and 467 also include the recommended changes. Councilmember Buquet felt that this exception should only apply to projects that have been previously approved. Khosroo Esfahlani, informed the City Council about his proposed project and how staff has dealt with him in coming to a solution between he and his neighbor regarding his driveway. He added he has worked on this a very long time and is now disturbed that the code is changing after working on this project for such a long time. He added he had not received approval yet and did not think he would be treated fairly if these new conditions would be made to apply to him. City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 18 (43) (44) Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that he did not completely agree with all of Mr. Esfahlani's comments. Councilmember Buquet suggested that possibly there be stipulations made that if a person is so far along in getting their approvals for their project, that the new guidelines may not have to apply. He suggested that a Subcommittee work on this for the eleven projects that are currently in the pipeline of getting approval. Mayor Pro Alexander stated he concurred with Councilmember Buquet's suggestion. James Markman, City Attorney, cautioned the City Council on this suggestion. Pete Pitassi, 9267 Base Line, stated he has worked on this process, stating he also is representing the smaller multiple-family dwelling units. He expressed his concern for the clarification on Section 5 also. He stated that he agreed with Councilmember Buquet's previous suggestion. There being no further comments, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance Nos. 465, 466 and 467. ORDINANCE NO. 465 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, REGARDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND RAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTAND TERRAVISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts within the Terra Vista Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (0203-05 TVCP AMEN) ORDINANCE NO. 466 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRAVISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND dESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY AMENDMENT 91-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend various development standards and design guidelines for multi-family residential districts within the Victoria Planned Community area. Staff recommends issuance of a Negative Declaration. (0203-05 VCP AMEN) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 19 ORDINANCE NO. 467 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF R/LNCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA PL/LNNED COMMUNITY -AMENDMENT 91-02, AMENDING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Wright to waive full reading of Ordinance Nos. 465, 466 and 467. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded'by Buquet to set second reading of Ordinance Nos. 465, 466 and 467 for November 20, 1991, as amended. Motion carried 3-1-1 (Wright no; Stout absent). G. PUBLIC HEARINGS G1. CONSIDERATION TO ESTABLISH A SPEED LIMIT OF 40 MPH ON HILLSIDE ROAD FROM ARCHIBALD AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE, 40 MPH ON MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE FROM SPRUCE AVENUE TO MILLIKEN AVENUE AND 35 MPH ON FREDERICKSBURG AND CANISTEL AVENUES FROM BANYAN STREET TO WILSON AVENUE Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. (1141-10 SPEED ZON) Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Helen Magaha, Vicksburg Street, stated she agreed with staff's recommendation. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 468. ORDINANCE NO. 468 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 10.20.020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN CITY STREETS MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 468 for November 20, 1991. Motion carried 3-0-2 (Williams, Stout absent). G2. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTIONS RELATING TO THE FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1 Staff report presented by Duane Baker, Assistant to the City Manager. (0401-20 AD 89-1) (45) (46) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 20 (47) Mayor Pro Tem Alexander opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Jim Westling, who thanked the City staff for working with him on this project. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 91-333 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PASSING ON THE "REPORT" OF THE ENGINEER, GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING RESOLUTION NO. 91-334 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 91-335 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENTION TO ORDER THE INSTALLATION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS IN A PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; DECLARING THE WORKTO BE MORE THANLOCAL OR ORDINARY BENEFIT; DESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE ASSESSED TO PAY THE COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF; AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to approve Resolution Nos. 91-333, 91-334 and 91-335. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION TO SUPPORT THE DRAFT CONGESTIONMANAGEMENT PLANAS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD OF THE SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS IN THEIR ROLE AS CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AGENCY FOR SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AND AS EXPLAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING REPORT Staff report presented by Jack Lam, City Manager. (1160-00 TRAFFIC) ACTION: Report received and filed. , , , , , No Items Submitted. COUNCIL BUSINESS City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 21 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR MEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Buquet suggested that the Jack Benny Statue matter be discussed at the December 4, 1991 City Council meeting. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC K1. REOUEST FROM ROBERT OLARI TO SPEAK REGARDING THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER 20, 1991 (0401-12 FEES} Robert Olari, 9637 Manzanita, asked if the Cost Recovery item which was scheduled to be heard at the November 20, 1991 City Council meeting could be delayed. He stated he did not agree with the Griffith Study and felt there should be workshops scheduled so that the City Council could get a better feeling of the community's feelings. Mayor Pro Tem Alexander stated he did not think this should be delayed and felt if there were people who want to express their concerns with the study, or the increases, they can do so at the November 20th meeting, whereby a decision could be made at that time to possibly have additional workshops or approve the fees as proposed. Councilmember Buquet stated he felt the process should go through on the November 20th City Council agenda and did not feel anyone would benefit from having additional workshops. ACTION: It was decided that the Council Subcommittee of Buquet and Williams would arrange for a meeting to be held with Mr. Olari to discuss before the November 20th Council meeting some of his concerns regarding this matter. K2. Primo Morales, president of Rancho Little League, asked the Council if his group could be given the same consideration in relation to the fees as was given to the equestrian programs. Councilmember Buquet stated he felt there was a little more to it than Mr. Morales was aware of, but that he would be given the opportunity to give more input at the November 20th public hearing. Councilmember Wright felt the equestr'ian issue was something that needed to be addressed at the November 20th meeting. K3. Phil Deatherage, 6564 Etiwanda Avenue, asked when the Rochester and Arrow intersection would be opened up. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, felt it would hopefully be opened up in one to two months. (48) City Council Minutes November 6, 1991 Page 22 L. ADJOURNMEN~ MOTION: Moved by Wright, seconded by Williams to adjourn the meeting to Executive Session to discuss pending litigation regardingAmerican Insurance and University Crest. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Stout absent). The meeting adjourned at 11:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ~ds~,CM~ City Clerk Approved: December 18, 1991