HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988/02/03 - Minutes February 3, 1988
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular MeetinR
A. ~T.T. TO ORDER
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga met on
Wednesday, February 3, 1988, in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line
Road, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:30
P.M. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmembers: Deborah N. Brown, Charles J. Buquet II, Jeffrey
King, Pamela J. Wright, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; City Attorney, James
Markman; City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet; Assistant City Manager, Robert A.
Rizzo; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Brad Bullet; City
Engineer, Russell Maguire; Building Official, Jerry Grant; Assistant Civil
Engineer, Barbara Krall; Associate Planner, Debra Meier; Assistant Planner, Greg
Gage; Community Code Representative Supervisor, Richard Alcorn.
B. ANNO~N~RM~NTS/P~ESENTATIONS
B1. Mr. Wasserman requested that Consent Calendar Item C21 be continued to
February 17, 1988, at the request of the developer, and Item F1 to be
considered at the same time as Item E4.
B2. Mayor Stout requested that Consent Calendar Item 11 be removed for
discussion.
C. CONSENT ~AT~NDA.R
C1. Approval of Warrants, Register No's. 1/20/88 and 1/27/88 and Payroll ending
1/21/88 for the total amount of $1,051,083.45.
C2. Approval to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of January 26,
1988.
C3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale Beer and Sine, Mohawk Seafood
Co., Robert Camell, 10013 E. 8th Street, Suite A.
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 2
(i)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
CA. Approval of the funding source for participation in the 800 MHZ Radio
Frequency Feasibility Study as account number 01-4124-6028. (1205-01 RADIO
COM)
C5. Approval of the name of the park facility located on Feron, west of Turner,
to be "Old Town Park". (1404-06 PARK DEVEL)
C6. Approval to name the existing Beryl Park facility as "Beryl Park East" and
the ten acre expansion to the facility as "Beryl Park West". (1404-06 PARK
DEVEL)
C7. Approval for boxing and storage of three (3) mature Olive Trees from the
"La Mission" Labor Camp site. Trees to be planted in a future Terra Vista
Development park. The park design will incorporate the trees to commemorate the
historical past served by the labor camp. (0203-02 TREES)
C8. Approval to award and execute Professional Services Agreement (CO 88-11) to
prepare plans and contract documents for White Alder Tree Removals in Tract
11934 (Victoria Planned Community) to RJM Design Group. The amount, not to
exceed $5,000.00 is to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 with
a loan from the Beautification Fund. (0602-01 CONTRACT)
C9. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract
12902 located at the southwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Almond Street,
submitted by Nordic Woods 11 Ltd., a California Limited Partnership. (0602-01
AGREE IMPR) (1002-09 MAP FINAL)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~}41
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 12902
C10. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for a Traffic
Signal located at the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road,
submitted by Lewis Development Company. (0602-01 AGREE IMPR) (1162-02 TRAF
SIGNL)
RESOLUTION NO. 88{42
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AlPPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT THE INTERSECTION
OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND BASE LINE ROAD
Cll. Approval of the development of an 8.2 acre integrated shopping center
consisting of four (4) retail buildings totaling 87,581 square feet in the
Community Commercial (CC) District, located at the southeast corner of Foothill
City Council Hinutes
February 3, 1988
Page 3
Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN 208-261-58. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION AS
REQUESTED BY NAYOR DENNIS L. STOUT. (0203-05 COM DEVEL)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
87-16 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN 8.2 ACRE INTEGRATED SHOPPING
CENTER, CONSISTING OF 4 RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 87,581
SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND LOCATED AT
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HELLMAN
AVENUE IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF
C12. Approval to award the bid for the Base Line Road Widening Improvement
Project between Archibald Avenue and Hellman Avenue to J.E.G. Construction
Company, Incorporated, for the amount of $264,307.15; to be funded from the
Systems Fund. (0601-01 BID)
C13. Approval of Improvement Agreement and Security and Real Property
Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement (CO 88-12) for CUP 86-02, located on the
northwest corner of Beryl and 19th Streets, submitted by Community Baptist
Church of Alta Loma. (0602-01 AGREE I/L)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-044
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH
AND AUTHORIZING THE NAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
RESOLUTION NO. 88~45
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 86-02
C14. Approval to accept Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement
(CO 88-13) from Neal S. and Rebecca A. Weeks for a single family residence,
located on the west side of Crooked Creek Drive, south of Hillside Road.
(0602-01 AGREE I/L)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-046
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT
(9)
(~o)
(~1)
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 4
(15)
(~6)
CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FROM NEAL S. AND REBECCA WEEKS
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME
C15. Approval to summarily vacate certain drainage easements within the future
freeway corridor north of Highland Avenue between Milliken and Rochester
Avenue. (1110-18 VACATE ESM)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF
CERTAIN UNNEEDED EASEMENTS FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES NORTH OF
HIGHLAND AVENUE AND WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE
C16. Approval of a Subordination Agreement (CO 88-14) for Lot 19 of Tract 7176
located at 8406 Orchard Street, submitted by Roland L. and Carolyn A. Taylor.
(0602-01 AGREE SUB)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-048
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT
FOR ROLAND L. AND CAROLYN A. TAYLOR AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SAME
C17. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and file a Notice of
Completion for Tract 13203 located on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and
Center Avenue. (0602-01 BOND EEL) (0704-18 NOT COMPLT)
Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $58,000
Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 5,800
RESOLUTION NO. 88~49
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR
TRACT 13203 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE WORK
C18. Approval of Revocation, Release Satisfaction and Cancelation of Agreement
for Postponement of CC&R's for Tracts 13057 and 13058. (1002-09 CC&R)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-050
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING AN AGREEMENT FOR
POSTPONEMENT OF APPROVAL OF CC&R'S FOR TRACTS 13057 AND
13058
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 5
C19. Approval of Improvement Agreement Extension for Parcel Map 8617 located on
the east side of Milliken Avenue north of Highland Avenue, submitted by
Marlborough Development. (0602-01 AGREE EXTN)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR PARCEL MAP 8617
C20. Approval of Map, Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security for Tract
13275 located between Lemon and Highland Avenues, east of Haven Avenue,
submitted by Oxford Development Corporation. (0602-01 AGREE IMPR)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT,
IMPROVEMENT SECURITY, AND FINAL MAP OF TRACT NO. 13275
C21. Approval of Parcel Map 10972 located between Highland Avenue and Banyan
Street and between Milliken Avenue and the Deer Creek Channel, submitted by
Ahmanson Developments, Incorporated. (1002-09 MAP PARCEL) ITEM CONTINUED TO
FEBRUARY 17, 1988 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT REQUEST OF DEVELOPER.
RESOLUTION NO. 88-053
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 10972
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 10972)
C22. Approval of Parcel Map 11236 located on the north side of Red Oak Street,
between Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue and submitted by Barton Development.
( 1002-09 MAP PARCEL)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~54
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 11236
(TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 11236)
C23. Set public hearing for March 2, 1988 - Approval for Amending Map, Tract
No. 13058, located south of Highland Avenue, between Fairmont Way and the Deer
Creek Channel, submitted by Pulte Home Corporation; a Michigan Corporation.
(1002-09 MAP TRACT)
(17)
(~8)
(~9)
(20)
(21)
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 6
(22)
(23)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-055
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCliO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO APPROVE
AMENDING MAP, TRACT 13058 AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
REARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
C24. Set public hearing for March 2, 1988 - Approval to Annex Tract No. 13275,
located 1200' east of Haven, north side of Highland Avenue, to Landscape
Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 42. (0401-03 LNSCAPE HD)
RESOLUTION NO. 88.056
A RESOLUTION OF TRE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 42 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 88.057
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE
ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 42 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1;
PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
C25. Set public hearing for March 2, 1988 - Approval to Annex Parcel Map 11236
located between Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue north of Red Oak Street to
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3 as Annexation No. 14. (0401-03 LNSCAPE MD)
RESOLUTION NO. 88-058
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 14 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3
RESOLUTION NO. 88-059
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER TRE
ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3, AN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 14 TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3;
PURSUANT TO TRE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 AND
OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 7
C26. Set public hearing for March 2, 1988 - Approval to Annex Tract No. 13275
and Parcel Map No. 11236 (various locations throughout the City) to Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 as Annexation No. 37. (0401-03 ST LT MD)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~60
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 37 TO STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
RESOLUTION NO. 88~)61
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE
ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1, AN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 37 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 1; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
C27. Set public hearing for March 2, 1988 - Approval to Annex Tract No. 13275
located 1200' east of Haven Avenue, north side of Highland Avenue to Street
Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 as Annexation No. 25. (0401-03 ST LT MD)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~)62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 25 TO STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2
RESOLUTION NO. 88~)63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE
ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2, AN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 25 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 2; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
C28. Set public hearing for March 2~ 1988 - Approval to Annex Parcel Map No.
11236 located between Laurel Street and Spruce Avenue, north of Red Oak, to
Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 as Annexation No. 10. (0401-03 ST LT
MD)
(24)
(25)
(26)
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 8
RESOLUTION NO. 88~64
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CITY
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO STREET LIGHTING
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6
RESOLUTION NO. 88~65
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE
ANNEXATION TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6, AN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: DESIGNATING SAID ANNEXATION AS
ANNEXATION NO. 10 TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 6; PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
AND OFFERING A TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OBJECTIONS THERETO
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to approve the balance of the Consent
Calendar minus Items CI1 and C21. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Discussion of Item Cll. Approval of the development of an 8.2 acre integrated
shopping center consisting of four (4) retail buildings totaling 87,581 square
feet in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located at the southeast corner
of Foothill Boulevard and Hellman Avenue - APN 208-261-58. (0203-05 COM DEVEL)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
87-16 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN 8.2 ACRE INTEGRATED SHOPPING
CENTER, CONSISTING OF 4 RETAIL BUILDINGS TOTALING 87,581
SQUARE FEET ON PROPERTY WITHIN THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC
PLAN, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HELLMAN AVENUE IN
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
Mr. Markman stated staff had prepared a Resolution as directed by Council at the
conclusion of the public hearing held at the previous meeting. Mr. Markman
further stated that on Page 9 of the Resolution Item 6 should be deleted and
Item 7 should be changed to 6 and the paragraph should read, "The City Clerk is
hereby directed to certify to the adoption of this Resolution". He reminded
Council that the hearing had been closed, and the hearing had not been re-
advertized; therefore~ the Council could not hear any further testimony. The
only thing before Council for consideration tonight was the Resolution per
Council's direction.
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 9
Councilman King stated he had read the transcript of the minutes since he was
not at the hearing, and he did not see any reason to re-notice and open up the
public hearing unless there was going to be further new input.
Councilman Buquet stated this was consistent with past Council actions where
Council directed staff to bring back a Resolution confirming Council's position.
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve Resolution No. 88-043.
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
Brown, Buquet, Stout
King, Wright
D. CONSENT ORDINANCES
City Clerk Authelet read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 335, 336 and 337.
D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 87-10 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development District Map from Low
Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and Medium High Density
Residential to General Industrial, Subarea 1, for 4.31 acres of land, located
north of 8th, east of Grove Avenue and west of Baker Avenue - APN 207-541-60
and 207-251-12. (0203-09 DD AMEN)
ORDINANCE NO. 335 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE
NO. 87-10, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION
FROM MEDIUM-HIGH AND LOW RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC
PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET, EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND
WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207-541-60 & 207-251-12
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87-03-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Industrial Specific Plan to
expand Subarea 1 to include 4.31 acres of land generally located east of Grove
Avenue, north of 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue - APN 207-541-60 and 207-
251-12. (0203-05 SP AMEND)
ORDINANCE NO. 336 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCliO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 87-03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUBAREA ONE
LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET, EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND WEST
(27)
(28)
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 10
(29)
OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207-541-60 & 207-251-12
D2. CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPEED LIMIT - Recommendation to
establish a 35 MPH speed limit on Lemon Avenue between Sapphire Street and
Archibald Avenue. (1141-10 SPEED LIM)
ORDINANCE NO. 337 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 10.20.010 AND
10.20,020 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CODE REGARDING PRIMA
FACIE SPEED LIMITS UPON CERTAIN CITY STREETS
Councilwoman Wright requested Item number D1 be removed for discussion.
MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance
337 and approve said Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Discussion of Item D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
AMENDMENT 87-10 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Development
District Map from Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) and
Medium High Density Residential to General Industrial, Subarea 1, for 4.31 acres
of land, located north of 8th, east of Grove Avenue and west of Baker Avenue-
APN 207-541-60 and 207-251-12. Staff Report presented by Brad Bullet, City
Planner. (0203-09 DD AMEN)
ORDINANCE NO. 335 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE
NO. 87-10, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION
FROM MEDIUM-HIGH AND LOW RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC
PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET, EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND
WEST OF BAKER AVENUE - APN 207-541-60 & 207-251-12
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87-03-
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Industrlal Specific Plan to
expand Subarea 1 to include 4.31 acres of land generally located east of Grove
Avenue, north of 8th Street and west of Baker Avenue - APN 207-541-60 and 207-
251-12. (0203-05 SP AMEND)
ORDINANCE NO. 336 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 87-03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUBAREA ONE
LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET~ EAST OF GROVE AVENUE AND WEST
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 11
OF BAKER AVENIlE - APN 207-541-60 & 207-251-12
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comment. Addressing Council was:
Carolyn Krouse, 8351 Chaffey Street, Rancho Cucamonga, representing a
majority of the residents in the neighborhood. They did not feel the City
showed enough interest in the residents in the southwest portion of the
City. They were concerned with the buildlng design and permitted uses,
landscape which would compllment the residential area, visual quality of
the streetscapes, and the problem of grafflti. They wanted to have
included in the permitted uses the following: Administrative Offices;
Professlonal and Design Services; Financlal~ Insurance, and Real Estate
Services; Personal Services; Business and Support Services; Recreational
Facilities; and Professlonal Offices.
There being no further public input, Mayor Stout closed the meeting.
Councilman Buquet suggested that we consider only the portions owned by the City
have staff do the necessary work to put in place the restrictions which were
discussed early, and notify the private property owners that we did not consider
their parcel as part of the change. He stated further we can then invite them,
if they wish to pursue this, to come in and talk with staff; with the idea in
mind that a Development Agreement be entered into on those sites.
Councilman King stated he felt more comfortable, at the present time, if we
dropped this for now. If someone was interested at a later time, then we could
enter into a Development Agreement at that time.
Councilwoman Wright expressed that we should deal with the issue now because the
current zoning was not acceptable. The area did need to be changed~ and it
needs to be done while we have the input and the interest of the citizens of
that area. There was concern because the neighbors were not aware that the
property to the east had been zoned industrial. Since they are now aware and
want to give their input, we need to act on it now. She was in favor of listing
the permitted uses in the CC&R*s with the input of the neighborhood residents.
She further concurred the property should be split.
Councilwoman Brown expressed she did not feel the property should be split. It
would not be a saleable piece of property and if too many restrictions were
placed on it, it might not sell.
Mayor Stout felt something should be done now.
Mr. Bullet, City Planner, suggested the item return to the Planning Commission
for an evaluation of the resident's proposal since the Planning Commission did
not consider splitting the properties.
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 12
(30)
Mr. Markman, City Attorney, read the amended titles of Ordinance Nos. 335 and
336 for a new first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 335 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~ANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE
NO. 87-10, REQUESTING A CHANGE IN THE DISTRICT DESIGNATION
FROM MEDIUM-HIGH AND LOW RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC
PLAN LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE-
APN 207-541-60
ORDINANCE NO. 336 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN
AMENDMENT 87-03, REQUESTING AN ADDITION TO SUBAREA ONE
LOCATED NORTH OF 8TH STREET AND WEST OF BAKER AVENUE -APN
207-541-60
MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of the amended
Ordinance Nos. 335 and 336, and set second reading for February 17, 1988.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Mayor Stout called a recess at 8|15 P.M.
with all members of the Council present.
The meeting reconvened at 8:25 P.M.
E. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARIN~
El. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 87-05 - APPEAL - CROSS
AND CROWN LUTHERAN CHURCH - An appeal with respect to the use of roof tile and
the completion of Vista Street with a temporary cul-de-sac, for the development
of a 4,900 square foot sanctuary building and a 2,300 square foot office and
classroom building on 5 acres of land in the Very Low Residential District (less
than 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at 6723
Etiwanda Avenue - APN 227-061-03. (Continued from January 6, 1988.) Staff
reports presented by Debra Meier, Associate Planner, regarding the roof tile and
by Barbara Krall, Assistant Civil Engineer, regarding Vista Street. (0701-06
APPEAL)
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
William Ryan of William Ryan, Inc., designer of the church, stated they
were appealing the use of roof tile because they felt that wood shake would
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 13
fit the architectural design better. He presented a compromise material
for roofing material called "talehake" which was a cement product which had
the appearance of the woodshake.
Councilman Buquet asked if staff could look at this materlal and give an
evaluation.
Mr. Bullet, City Planner, stated the Planning Connission had not seen this and
it had not been used in the City before.
Councilman King asked what the difference in the financial impact would be if
Vista Street were curved. Staff responded probably a few hundred dollars.
Dave Long, 13021 Vista Street, owner of the house adjacent to the church
property, stated he had no objections to having the street finished as the
church wanted. He did have some concerns, however, if a wall were
installed at the end of the street. There was a windrow there and if the
wall were built in such a way to create a space in between which would
collect trash, he would have objections.
There being no further public input, Mayor Stout closed the public hearing.
Discussion followed by the Council regarding the Calshake material.
Grant~ Building Official, was present and answered questions by Council.
Jerry
MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by King to do the cul-de-sac section with the
church providing the cost of the street curb and refer the matter of the roofing
material to Design Review. If the material is not approved by Design Review
then they could come back to the City Council for consideration. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 86-27 - CALIFORNIA FINISHED
METALS - Appeal of the Planning Commnission's decision requiring undergroundlng
of existing overhead utilities along 7th Street for a proposed warehouse
addition in the General Industrial District (Subarea 5) located on the southeast
corner of Center Avenue and 7th Street - APN 209-262-13. (Continued from
January 20, 1988.) ITEM HAD BEEN WITHDRAWN BY THE APPLICANT. (0701-06 APPEAL)
E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 88-01 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An amendment to Section 17.10.030G2 of the Development Code
pertaining to parking lot and sidewalk sales. Staff report presented by Richard
Alcorn, Community Code Representative Supervisor. (0203-03 DC AMEND)
(32)
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 14
(33)
(34)
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 338.
ORDINANCE NO. 338 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AMENDING SECTION 17.10.030G2 OF THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO PARKING LOT AND
SIDEWALK SALES
MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Wright to waive full reading of Ordinance
No. 338 and set second reading for February 17, 1988. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND INDUSTRIAL SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 87-04-
GENERAL DYNAMICS - An amendment to the Access/Circulation Plan for the
Industrial Area Specific Plan (Subarea 10) to eliminate Cleveland Avenue, north
of 7th Street - APN 209-272-02. Staff report presented by Greg Gage, Assistant
Planner. (0203-05 SP AMEND)
Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
public hearing was closed.
City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 339.
ORDINANCE NO. 339 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC
PLAN (I.S.P.) AMENDMENT 87-04 REQUESTING THAT CLEVELAND
AVENUE (NORTH OF 7TH STREET) BE DELETED FROM THE INDUSTRIAL
SPECIFIC PLAN
MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Brown to waive full reading of Ordinance No.
339 and set second reading for February 17, 1988. Motion carried unanimously
5-0.
E5. ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH:
Wasserman~ City Manager.
Staff report presented by Lauren
As
ANNEXATION NO. 35 FOR TRACT NOS. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13445, PARCEL
MAP 10617, DR 87-21, DR 87-15 AND DR 87-09 (VARIOUS LOCATIONS
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 15
THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1.
(0401-03 ST LT MD)
RESOLUTION NO. 88.866
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCliO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN
CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 35 TO STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 AND ACCEPTING
THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13440,
13441, 13442, 13445, PARCEL MAP 10617, DR 87-21,
DR 87-15 AND DR 87-09
ANNEXATION NO. 7 FOR TRACT NOS. 13440, 13441, 13442, 13444, AND 13445,
(VICTORIA) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3. (0401-03 ST
LT MD)
RESOLUTION NO. 88.867
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN
CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 7 TO STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING
THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR TRACT NOS. 13440,
13441, 13442, TR 13444 AND 13445
ANNEXATION NO. 8 FOR PARCEL MAP 10617, DR 87-21, DR 87-15 AND DR 87-09
(VARIOUS LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT THE CITY) TO STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 6. (0401-03 ST LT M1))
RESOLUTION NO. 88-868
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN
CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 8 TO STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 AND ACCEPTING
THE FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10617,
DR 87-21, DR 87-15, AND DR 87-09
ANNEXATION NO. 12 FOR PARCEL MAP 10617, DR 87-21, DR 87-15 AND DR 87-
09 AND MDR 86-24 (INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL) TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. 3. (0401-03 LNSCAPE MD)
RESOLUTION NO. 88.869
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN
(35)
(36)
(37)
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 16
(38)
(39)
(4o)
CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NO. 12 TO LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 AND ACCEPTING THE FINAL
ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PARCEL MAP 10617, DR 87-21,
DR 87-15 AND DR 87-09 AND MDR 86-24
MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Stout to approve Resolution Nos. 88-066, 88-
067, 88-068 and 88-069. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
F. PUBLIC ltEARI. NC_~
FI. SUMMARY VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE BETWEEN 7TH STREET AND THE A.T. & S.F.
RAILROAD (V-069) - located between Milllken Avenue and Haven Avenue, in
connection with Amendment (87-04) to the Access/Circulation Plan for the
Industrial Area Specific Plan to eliminate Cleveland Avenue. Staff report
presented by Greg Gage, Assistant Planner. (1110-18 VACATE ST)
RESOLUTION NO. 88~)70
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF
CLEVELAND AVENUE BETWEEN 7TH STREET AND THE A.T. & S.F.
RAILROAD
Mr. Markman, City Attorney, pointed out the Resolution needed to be changed and
become effective thirty (30) days after the adoption of Ordinance No. 339.
MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by King to continue for further consideration
to February 17, 1988 to be heard along with Environmental Assessment and
Industrial Specific Plan Amendment 87-004 - General Dynamics. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
C. CITY MAMACEil' S STAFF RKPOETS
G1. FOLLOW UP REPORT ON DUST CONTROL ISSUES - Northview Drive, Tetra Vista.
(Continued from January 20, 1988.) (1403-01 DUST COME) Staff report presented
by Jerry Grant, Building Official.
ACTION: Council directed the City Attorney to send a letter to the Dust Control
Board regarding our removal from the district.
G2. STATUS REPORT ON CITY "IN HOUSE" RECYCLING. (1170-04 RECYCLE)
report presented by Diane O'Neal, Administrative Intern.
Staff
City Council M_inutes
February 3, 1988
Page 17
ACTION: Council received and filed report.
G3. STATUS REPORT ON ASSET FORFEITURES IN DRUG RELATED CASES.
SHERIFF} Staff report presented by Lauren Wasserman, City Manager.
(1301-00
Mr. Wasserman stated that he should meet with the Sheriff regarding the funds.
We were close to an agreement, but details still need to be worked out.
ACTION: Council concurred and received and filed report,
H; COUNCIL BUSINESS
H1. ADVISORY COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR APPOINTMENTS
TO THE ADVISORY COMMISSION. {0701-01 COMMISSON)
MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Stout to approve the Subcommittee's
recommendations of:
James Campbell, representing Alta Loma, term expiring 12/89
George Leimann, representing Cucamonga, term expiring 12/89
Andy Solorzano, representing Etiwanda, term expiring 12/89
Ray McIlvain, at large, term expiring 12/89
Patricia Gearhart, at large, term expiring 12/89:
Filling an unexpired term was: Tiina Ross, at large, term expiring 12/88.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
H2. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
APPOINTMENTS TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION. {0701-01 COMMISSION)
MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve the foll owing
appointments:
Bob Schmidt
Melicent Arner
Marsha Banks
Alan Haskvitz to fill the unexpired term of Maxine Strane.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
*** ***
(4~)
(42)
(43)
City Council Minutes
February 3, 1988
Page 18
<44)
H3. STATUS REPORT ON WEST END COALITION BY BROWN (0701-01 COMMITTEE)
ACTION: Council received and filed report:
IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING
Councilwoman Brown requested that the responsibility for Disaster Preparedness
be placed on the February 17, 1988 Agenda for consideration transferring the
responsibility from the Public Safety Commission to the City Council.
THERE WERE NONE.
*** ***
COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC
K: ADJOURNNENT
MOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to a joint meeting with
the Planning Commission on Tuesday, February 16, 1988 at the Magic Lamp. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 9:50 P.M.
Respectfully ~.mi~
' B~Authj1 et
City Clerk
Approved: February 17, 1988
mCERTIFIED
COURT
REPORTERS
Barrett, Dawson · Meiman
CERTIFIED COPY
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 88-043
Date:
Wednesday, February 3, 1988
Time:
7:30 p.m.
Location:
Lions Park Community Center
Council Chambers
9161 Base Line Road
Ran~ho Cucamonga, California
Reporter.:
Mary Neal., Certified Shorthand Reporter
Certificate No, 6346
1630 E. Palm Street
Santa Arm, CA
92701
'"!4) 558-9400
-3) 637-3550
APPEARANCES
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL:
DENNIS L. STOUT, Mayor
PAMELA J. WRIGHT, Mayor Pro Tem
DEBORAH J. BROWN, Councilmember
CHARLES J. BUQUET, Councilmember
JEFFREY KING, Councilmember
STAFF:
LAUREN M. WASSERMAN, City Manager
JAMES L. MARE, City Attorney
BRAD BULLER, City Planner
JACK LAM, Community Development Director
RUSSELL H. MAGUIRE, City Engineer
DEBBIE ADAMS, Deputy City Clerk
(714) 558-9400
(213) 637-3550
2
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Wednesday, February 3, 1988
Rancho Cucamonga, California
MAYOR STOUT: Item 11.
MR. MARKMAN: On Item 11, per the Council's
direction,.Staff has prepared proposed Resolution 88-043
following the conclusion of the NuWest hearing.
I do want to indicate that Paragraph 6 of the
proposed Resolution ought to be removed, as that statute
of limitations provision does not apply in this situation.
Paragraph 7 would become 6. I should hand this to the
City Clerk -- this is by directive -- to certify it as
the adoption of this Resolution. The rest of that
interrelates with the removed paragraph.
Other than that, I'd like to remind the
Council that the hearing has been closed. The testimony
is in. The hearing has not been readvertised. It would
be improper to take further testimony. This has been
prepared per the Council direction so that you can discuss
the conditions that were added and either keep them as is
or not at your direction.
MAYOR STOUT: You've indicated that the public
hearing is closed, and there can be no further testimony?
MR. MARKMAN: That is correct. We have closed the
hearing. It hasn't been readvertised or renoticed. No
(714) 558-9400
(213) 637-3550
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT: Does the fact that it was
advertised as part of the consent calendar then not make a
difference?
MR. MARKMAN: No. As I said, the action item is
the presentation to the Council of the Resolution you
directed on the three/one vote the last time. So the item
to consider is the Resolution as is or as you would wish
to amend it. The item on the agenda is not further public
testimony on this project.
That's why I'm indicating we have a complete
record of all the input, oral and written, on this item at
a properly noticed hearing. We want to keep it that way.
That would be the procedure any time you have closed the
hearing and simply directed the preparation of the
resolution. Other types of items on the consent calendar
that really aren't hearing items, you can discuss or not
discuss or take input as you would.
MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT: Thank you.
COUNCILMEMBER BUQUET: Just for clarification, it
appears to me what you're saying is that if this were an
ordinance, it would be listed under our consent
ordinances; but I guess by virtue of it being a Resolution
or otherwise, it was listed on the consent calendar rather
than under the consent ordinance category.
MR. MARKMAN: Yes, it is not an ordinance, first of
(714) 558-9400
(213) 637-3550
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
one is on notice that it would be reopened or the people
could give you more input prior to making your decision.
The only thing before you is the action on
the Resolution per your directire as you want to discuss
and amend the conditions or leave it as is.
MAYOR STOUT: All right.
MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT: I have a question about
that.
MAYOR STOUT: Yes.
MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT: Does that pertain to this
kind of an item individually on our consent agenda or
merely because it's on the consent calendar?
MR. MARKMAN: It pertains to any item that was
previously a noticed, advertised public hearing where
people came and testified. The hearing was closed. It
wasn't readvertised. It wasn't left open and continued
for a discussion on the Resolution.
It wasn't the fact that it is on the consent
calendar. That probably was an error. It's the fact that
there was a hearing. It was advertised and noticed.
People were heard. It was closed rather than continued.
The point being that somebody who may have
wanted to give other input had no notice that there would
be any other input to be received by way of testimony, if
you follow me.
~FIED
COURT
REPORTERS
(714) 558-9400
(213) 637-3550
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
renoticed, readvertised and started all over again in
essence.
So the hearing was closed. When it's closed,
it's closed. You can reopen, but not tonight. You'd have
to start all over again with the notice proceeding, if you
felt the need to do that.
MAYOR STOUT: What is the desire of the Council?
COUNCILMEMBER KING: I have looked through the
transcript. I did not sit through all of the public input
last time. If there is going to be new and additional
input -- I don't agree with the Resolution we have before
us, but I don't see any sense in necessarily going forward
and reopening the whole thing for public input again if
there's not going to be some new and additional input
other than what we have before us.
So although I don't agree with the Resolution
and intend to vote against it, I don't want to necessarily
move that we readvertise for a public hearing just for the
sake of delaying or for some other purpose.
I was not here for the last three hours or
four hours that the Council sat through the public input.
Whether or not the Council feels as a whole that new
testimony can be generated, I don't know. There's no
reason to open it up again and go through the same process
again if we're not going to get some new stuff.
(714) 558-9400
(213) 637-3550
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
all. What it probably should have been would have been a
new business item to consider the Resolution only. It's
not proper to take information that should have come in at
a hearing which was closed where everybody could have
notice and the opportunity to speak again or prepare for
rebuttal or however you want to look at it. It's just
like a trial closing. The two parties rest, then
deliberation and a decision. That's where we are at at
this point in this process.
COUNCILMEMBER BUQUET: In the event that the
Council were to take public testimony at this time, what
could be the problem with that?
MR. MARKMAN: The problem with that is we have a
record leading to your decision. Your decision has to be
supported by findings, which in turn are supported by the
evidence presented at the hearing.
If you take other input and then make the
decision, and it wasn't input generated through the
hearing process before the hearing was closed, then it's
difficult to establish the basis of your decision being
those matters on the record.
If reviewed in court, the court is limited in
the type of proceeding to reviewing the record before the
Council. The record would be muddied seriously certainly
if further testimony were taken tonight without having
C~RTIFIED
COURT-
REPORTERS
(714) 558-9400
(213) 637-3550
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MR. MARKMAN: I would ask you to take a roll-call
vote, because the court reporter cannot transcribe a voice
MAYOR STOUT: Will the Clerk call the roll.
TEE CLERK: Brown.
COUNCILMEMBER BROWN: Aye.
THE CLERK: Buquet.
COUNCILMEMBER BUQUET: Aye.
TEE CLERK: Stout.
MAYOR STOUT: Aye.
TEE CLERK: King.
COUNCILMEMBER KING: No.
TEE CLERK: Wright.
MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT: No.
MAYOR STOUT: Record the vote as given.
(END OF COUNCIL PROCEEDING.)
vote.
CERTIFIED
COURT
REPORTERS
(714) 558-9400
(213) 637-3550
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MAYOR STOUT: DO you want to take action on the
Resolution tonight?
COUNCILMEMBER BUQUET: I believe it's consistent
with cases in the past where we have held a public hearing
and the Council has directed Staff to bring back a
Resolution for a Council action after a consensus was
reached or a determination was made. I don't see where
this is significantly different from those other
circumstances.
I concur, in essence, with what Councilman
King alluded to as far as not wanting to reopen it just
for the sake of rehashing the issue. The public hearing
was the last meeting. It's all on record. A direction
was made by the Council, and we are here to review the
Resolution and either make approval of or disapproval of
that Resolution. I think that is actually the matter that
is before us tonight.
MAYOR STOUT: Does someone care to make a motion on
the Resolution?
COUNCILMEMBER BUQUET: I move approval of
Resolution 88-043.
COUNCILMEMBER BROWN: Second.
MAYOR STOUT: It's been moved by Buquet, seconded
by Brown to approve Resolution 88-043.
All those in favor?
CERTIFIED
COURT
REPORTERS
(714) 558-9400
(213) 637-3550
8
1
2
3
4
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
REPORTER' S 'CERTIFICATE
5
6 I, 3~ ~i , a Certified
7 Shorthand Reporter and a Notary Public of the State of
8 California with principal office in the County of Orange, do
9 hereby certify that the foregoing proceeding was written by
]0 me in Stenotypy, and transcribed into typewriting and that
the foregoing is a true and correct copy of my shorthand
notes thereof.
ated: FFR 8 198
BM CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS
Ilffltt, Dirtmeet · Ilelmmt
1630 Eat PiIm Street · Santa Ana, California 92701
(714) 558~ · (213)