HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/08/06 - Minutes - Adjourned August 6, 1987
CITY OF RANC~O CI]CA~EMIA
JOINT REDEVELOP~NT AGENCY/CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
~j~c~ed Neet~2~
A-. rATa', TO OR.t)gR
An adjourned joint meeting of the City Councll and Redevelolment Agency met at
the Alts Lo~a High School, 8880 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga. The meeting
wee called to order at 7:03 p.m. by Hayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Councilmembers/Agency membersz Deborah N. Brown, Charles J.
Buquet II, Jeffrey King, Pamela J. Wright, end Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Also present were: City Manager/Executive Director, Lauren PL Wasserman; City
Clerk/Assistant Secretary, Beverly A. Antbaler; City Attorney, James Harkman;
RM Legs1 Counsel, John Brown; Cc~munlty Develol~nent Director/Deputy Director,
Jack Lam; Senior RIR Analyst, Ltnde Danlels; RIR Analyst, Olen Jones.
B. AI~eOUNGBMBNI~/PRBS]!N'ffLTIOIe
NO ITE~ SUBMITTED
CI. Authorization for Agency staff to execute Certlflcatee of C~nformance for
certain property owners in the Project Area. (0203-06 RDA)
C2. Authorization for Agency and City to execute Agreement (CO #RA87-19)with
Alts Lc~a Elamentary School District. (0203-06 RIR)
NOTION: Moved by King, seconded by Buquet to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
D. A/WBRTISBD PUBLIC
Hayor Stout stated the purpose of the meeting was to take public testimony
prior to considering adoption of Amendment No. I to the Redevelopment Plan.
(0203-06 P/R)
Hayor/Chairman Stout declared the public hearing open for the City Council and
the RedeveloI~ent Agency. He stated the record contained the followlng
docusents:
1. Affidavit of publication of a notice of this public hearing published
July 8, 15, and 22, 1987.
A copy of the notice of puhllc hearing which was mailed by certified
mail to the last known accesses of each parcel of land in the proj act
area.
An affidavit of mailing to property owners in the project area and a
list of those property owners to whom a notice was mailed by certified
mail.
An affidavit of mailing to affected taming agencies and a llst of
taxing agencies to whom the notice was mailed by certified mail.
5. Minutes of the meeting of the Agency and Council on July 15, 1987.
6. Copy of the report pursuant to Section 33352 of the California Health
and Safety Code.
(t)
(2)
(3)
Joint RDA/City Council Heatlag
August 6, 1987
Page 2
7. Preliminary plan prepared on the Rancho Redevelopsent Project adopted
by the Planning Cc~mlssion on April 8, !987.
8, Copy of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan,
Copy of the preliminary report on Redevelolment Plan Amendment No, 1,
10. Copy of the report to City Council prepared and tranmitted to the
City Council on November 18, 1981.
11, Copy of all correspondence received during the fiscal review process
of the Redevelopsent Plan Amendment No, 1,
12. Copy of the Agencyes response to the correspondence received during
the fiscal review process,
13, Conflict of Interest Statement from all Agency Councilmembers,
14. Public Hearing Doc. ument Binder which containsz
a. Certification of the Registrar Voters Cucamonga School District
Special Tax & Appropriations Limit Election.
b. Certification of Reglstrsr voters Etiwanda School District
Special Tax & Appropriations Limit Election.
Fire Defense Study Foothill Fire Protection District Hay. 1987
Final Report.
d. Agreement by and beween Cucamonga School District and Ontario
Redevelo~ment Agency dated January 9. 198~.
e. Letter dated Septsaber 5, 1985 from Willlea Lyon Company to Board
of Trustees, Eatwands School District.
f. Tetra Vista School Facilities Agreement dated October 10, 1984.
g. FEHA 1980 records,
h. FEHa 1983 records.
i. City of Rancho Cucamon8a Annual Traffic Report 1986.
State~ide Intergraded Traffic Record System Report for the City
of Rancho Cucamonga 1982-86
k. City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Division Abatement
Records 1978-86,
1. Minutes and transcripts of June 17, 1987 Joint Public Hearing of
the Rancho Cucamonga City Councll and Redevelo[ment Agency.
m. Seventy-five minute video tape of Rancho Redevelopneat Project
Area Film July 29, 1987.
Mayor/Chslrman Stout asked Mr. Lem, Deputy Executive Director, to introduce the
Agency staff members and Redevelopaent Agency Consultant and Counsel, and for
them to provide a brief presentsalon on the RedeveloFment Plan and the
Envirorsaental Impact Report.
Mr. Lem introduced John Brown, Legal Counsel for the Agency. Hr. Brtce Russell
of Ounn, Russell. Copenheven & Co.. Inc. Nr. Lsm indicated Mr. Brown would
make a brief presentation regarding the purpose of re-holding the publ ic
hearing, and Mr. Russell would make a brief presentation regarding the
Redevelopneat Plan and the supplement to the Envlrorsaental Impact Report.
Hayor/Chairman Stout asked the City Clerk to read any written communications
received in favor of the proposed Redevelops,at Plan.
City Clerk Authelet stated there were written communications received as
follows:
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
PaSs 3
From the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation who asked that the following
letter be read into the records
'Dear Dennis~ I understand-that, the Rancke Cucsmonga Redevelopsent Agency
will be considering various amendments to the City's Redevelopsent Plan at
a special meeting on June 17, 1987. The Board of Directors for the Rancho
Cucamonga Community Foundation discussed the general concept of the RDA
Plan and unanimously voted to support the amendments recommended by the
City. The entire Board wishes to emphasize its strong support for the use
of P~A funds for facilities which are to be shared ssong the entire
community and which ultimately will benefit all residents of Rancho
Cucamonga. On behalf of the entire Rancho Cucsmonga Community Foundation
Board, I would like to extend to you and the City Council members our
support of the Redevelopsent Plan and our hope that all future RDA funds
will be allocated toward those projects which benefit the entire
community. Sincerely, Jeanne S. Barton, Chair."
Also received were letters
Diana Willieme, President of Friends of the Library
Mr. Rick Ccmez, 6856 Dakota Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, 91701
Timothy J. Beddle, Vice President, A.H. Reiter Developsent Compsny
Dennis L. Michael, Fire Chief, Foothill Fire Prevention District
Jack W. Kruse, Chief Planning Division, Department of Transportation/Flood
Control/Airports
Robert D. Dutton, President, Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce
Raweevan Kanokvechayant (Dr. K)
Jack H. Corrigan, Vice President, Commercial/Industrial of B.C.
Developsent Inco
Joseph N. Dilorio, President, The Caryn Company
Michael J. Rcsero, Vice President, Corporate Planning, Marlborough
Developsent Corporation
Terry Schlegel, 9829 Marlpose Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, 91730
Steven Kabel, 11325 Miner"1 Peak Court, Rancho Cucamonga, 91701
Steven Ford, Project Manager, William Lyon Company
Steve Wheatly of Steven Denials Commercial Brokerage
Ducan BudinSet, Project Manager, Developsent, The Hahn Ccmpsny.
Mayor/Chairman Stout stated that any one wishing to speak in favor of the
Redevelopsent Plan or having questions regarding the proposed plan, will now
have the opportunity to speak. Addressing Council were:
Diane Willlems, 725 Amethyst, speaking for Friends of the Library
Dennis L. Michael, Fire Chief, Foothill Fire Prevention District
Ed Swanson, Ontario Librarian
Jeffery Sceranka, 6221 Phillps Way.
Mayor/Chairman Stout asked the City Clerk to read any written communications
received in opposition to the proposed planl written communications from the
June 17 and any new ones.
Joint RDA/Clty Council Meeting
August 6. 1987
Page 4
(4)
(5)
A letter of protest frms Parkmr & Covert, attorneys for Central School
District and Etiwanda School District, dated June 17, 1987. Subject |
impacts on the school districts, the absence of conditions of blight within
the project eras, and certain other objectiona.
Letter of opposition frog Western Center on Law and Poverty Inc. dated June
17, 1987. SubJectz certain objections to the amendsent based upon impacts
on featlies and persons of los and moderate incose.
Heyor/Chairman Stout stated anyone wishins to speak in opposition to the
proposed Redevelopsant Flan or haven2 question regarding the proposed plan
could now come forward to address the Council/&Sancy. &ddresaln8 the Board
was I
Clayton H. Perktaro attorney representinS the Etiwanda School District and
the Cucsmonga School District.
Hsyor/Chaiman Stout asked if there was anyone present who wished to conent on
the Envirorsmental Impact Report to please come forward. Addressing the Board
was:
Clayton H. Parkmr. attorney repressmainS the Etiwanda School District and
the Central School District.
There being no further public comment. Heyor/Chairman Stout closed the public
hearin8 ef the: City Council and Redtwelolment. A~ency.
Meyor/Chaimen Stout asked ~r. Brown, the Agency Legal Counsel, tO give a brief
explanation of the actions that would be considered by the Agency and the City
Council.
Mr. Brown went over the rematnln8 actions that needed to be taken. He
highlighted that the Resolution and Ordinances shoald be adapted tonight with
language included that repeals the adopted ones on June 17, 1987.
D1. OOUNCIL/A~NCY,' IN A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING,' ADOPT RESOLUTIONS APPROVING
A~NDBD PLAN AND C~RTtFYtNG THE FINAL SUPP~BIeNT TO THN ENVtP. ONM~NTAL IMPACT
.RBFORT. (0203-06 PaR)
Hayor/Chairman Stout stated the next its of business was the approval of a
Resolution of the Rancho Cucomonga Redevelopsent Agency certifying the final
E.I.R.
RESOLUTION leO. 1~ 87-010
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANC~O C~CABDI~A REDEVELOP~NT AGENCY
CERTIFYIN[; ~1~E FINAL SUPPLEI~NT TO ll~E ENVIRONMENTAL
IMI~ACT RENORT FOR THE RBDEVELOPI~NT PLAN AI~ND~NT NO. 1
FOR THE RANCliO REDBVBLOP]~NT PROJECT AREA AND REI~AL
RESOLUTION NO. RA 87-008
NOTION: Moved by Buquntl seceded: by KIsS to approve.-... aesotuXi4nj slaT-010.
Marion carried unanimously 5-0.
Meyor/Chaiman Stout stated the next item of business was the approval of a
Resolution of the Agency approvlng the amended plan and recommending its
adoption by the City Council.
RESOLUTION NO. RA 87-011
A RESOLUTION OF THE KANC~O a~CANON3A RBDEVELOPI~NT AGENCY
APPROVII~ IBE PROPOSED RRDEVELOPI~NT PLAN AI~NDI~NT NO. 1
FOR ~lqg RAN(I~O RzD~vBLOPI~NT PROJECT AND RRCOMI~NDIN~
ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF T~E CITY OF RAN(I~O
COCANONGA AND REFRAL RESOLUTION NO. RA 87-009
NOTION: Moved by K/ha, seconded by Wright to approve Resolutlon RAg7-011.
Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Joint RDA/CIty Councll Meeting
August 6. 1987
Page 5
Mayor/Chairman 8tout stated that all business before the Agency has been
concluded, was there a motion for adjournment?
HOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to adjourn the RDA meeting. Motion
carried unanlmously 5-0.
Mayor Stout stated the Councll was still in session, and the next its of
business was approval of a Resolutlon by the City Councll certifying the flnal
E.I.R. with respect to Rsdevelolment Plan Amendment.
RESOLUTION NO. 87-414
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANO{O
GUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, r~.RTIFYING ~}{B FINAL SUPPLE~NT TO
~liE ENVIRON~NTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR RIEDEVELOPI~NT PLAN
AI~I~DMENT NO. I FOR THE RANCliO REDEVELOP~NT PROJECT AND
REPEAL RESOLUTION NO. 87-289
HOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve Reeolutlon Mo. 87-414.
Motion carried unanlmously 5-0.
D2. ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE BY THB CITY COUNCIL APPEOVING THB NANCliO
RBDBVELOPMBNT PLAN A~ND~NT NO. 1. (Amendment part of Ordinance) (0203-06
RDA)
Mayor Stout stated Councll has for consideration an Ordinance approvln8 and
adopting the Redevelol~ent Plan Amendment No. 1.
City Clerk Authelet read the title of said Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 316A (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN(I{O
OICAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING
REDEVELOPI~NT PLAN AI~NDMENT NO. 1 FOR ~liE RAN(I{O
REDEVELOP{NT PROJECT AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 316
HOTION: Meved by Wright, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading of Ordinance
No. 316A and to set second reading at s speclal meeting on August 13, 1987 at
the Neighborhood Center. Motion carried unanlmously 5-0.
Having concluded all business, Hayor Stout entertained a motion for
adj our~ment.
HOTION: Moved by Brown. seconded by Wright to adjourn. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
B~erlyA~Authelet
City Clerk/Asslstant Secretary
Approved: December 2, 1987
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
** ORIGINAL
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
Page 8
JOINT PUBLIC HEARING
OF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF I~J%NCHO CUCAMDNGA
~m~dqD
THE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA REdDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
)
RE: )
)
REDEVEDLOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT )
NO.1 FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT )
PROJECT. )
)
)
LOCAT I0 N:
DATE AND TI~E:
ALTA LOMA HIGH SCHOOL
8880 BASELINE
RANCHO CUCAFONGA, CA
AUGUST 6, 19 87
7:00 P.M.
REPORTED BY:
SHIRLEY M. KRAUSE, C.S.R., R.P.R.
(NO. 3066)
QUALITY COMPUTERIZED TRANSCRIPTION
-BY-
SHIRLEY M. KRAUSE
SHORTHAND REPORTING CORPORATION
4722 ORANGE STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
(714) 686-1411 OR (714) 686-1419
**Original in RDA Files
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Me~t~g
August 6, 1987
Page 9
APPEARANCES
FOR CITY OF RANCHO CU(RMDNGA
REDEVELOPMINT AGENCY:
AGENCY MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS:
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER
BY: JOHN E. BROWN
400 MISSION SQUARE
3750 UNIVERSITY AVENUE
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
DENNIS L. STO(IT, CHAIRPERSON
PAMELA J. WRIGHT,
VIe2 CHAIRPERSON
DEBORAH N. BROWN, AGENCY MEMBER
CHARLES J. BUQUET, AGENCY MEMBE]
JEFFREY KING, AGENCY MEMBER
DEBORAH N. BROWN
DENNIS L. STOUT
PAMELA J. WRIGHT
CHARLES J. BUQUET
JEFFREY KING
ALSO PRESENT:
JACK LAM
BRICE RUSSELL
JAMES MARKMAN, CITY ATTORNEY
BEVERLY AUTHELET, CITY CLERK
CLAYTON PARKER, ATTORNEY AT LAW
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ln~nr RDA/City Council Meetin~
Page 10 3
RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 6 , 19 87
THE CHAIRMAN: BOTH THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ARE SIMULTANEOUSLY CONVENED FOR THE
PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING DURING
WHICH THE COUNCIL AND THE AGENCY WILL BE TAKING PUBLIC
TESTIMONY PRIOR TO CONSIDERING THE ADOPTION OF
AMENDMENT NO. 1 OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
THE PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE HEARING IS TO
CONSIDER THE ADOPTION OF DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 1, INCLUDING CONSIDERATION OF ALL
OBJECTIONS WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THE HEARING TO THE
AMENDED PLAN OR THE SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT PREPARED ON THE AMENDED PLAN.
THIS IS THE TIME AND PLACE SET FOR JOINT PUBLIC
HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
HERINAPTER THIS WILL BE REFERRED TO AS THE
"REDEVELOPMENT PLAN." AND THE PROPOSED SUPPLEMENT TO
THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED ON
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 1, HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE
"EIR."
AT THIS HEARING, ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK FOR
OR AGAINST THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ON THE
EIR WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
I NOW DECLARE THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING
OPEN.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987 4
Page 11
WE WILL NOW CALL RC~L.
WE WILL START WIT}{ THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FOR
THE RECORD.
THE CHAIRMAN: BR(~qN.
MS. BROWN: HERE.
THE CHAIRMAN.. BUQUET.
MR. BUQUET: HERE.
THE CHAIRMAN: STOUT, HERE.
THE CHAIRMAN: KING.
MR. KING: HERE.
THE CHAIRMAN: WRIGHT.
MS. WRIGHT: HERE.
THE CHAIRMAN: WE WILL NOW CALL CITY COUNCIL
RC~L. BROWN.
MS. BROWN: HERE.
THE CHAIRMAN: BUQUET.
MR. BUQUET: HERE.
THE CHAIRMAN: STOUT, HERE.
THE CHAIRMAN: KING.
MR, KING: HERE.
THE C~AIRMAN: WRIGHT.
MS. WRIGHT: HERE.
THE CHAIRMAN: WE HAVE A BRIEF CONSENT
CALENDAR I WOULD LIKE TO TARE A LOOK AT, FIRST.
ALL OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS ARE EXPECTED TO
BE ROUTINE AND NONCONTROVERSIAL. THEY WILL BE ACTED
UPON BY THE COUNCIL AND AGENCY AT ONE TIME WITHOUT
DISCUSSION. ANY ITEM MAY BE REMOVED BY A COUNCIL MEMBER
KHAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/CitV Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
5
Page 12
OR AGENCY MEMBER OR MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE IN
DISCUSSION.
THERE ARE TWO ITEMS TO BE RECEIVED ON THE ~ONSENT
CALENDAR.
THE FIRST IS AN AUTHORIZATION FOR THE AGENCY STAFF
TO EXECUTE CERTIFICATES OF CONFORMARCE AND FOR CERTAIN
PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE PROJECT AREA.
THE SECOND ITEM IS AN AUTHORIZATION FOR THE AGENCY
AND THE CITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENTS FOR THE ALTA LOMA
ELEMENTARY SCHOCL DISTRICT.
DOES ANYONE WISH TO HAVE EACH OF THOSE ITEMS
REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION?
MR. KING: I'D LIKE TO TO MOVE TO ADOPT THE
CONSENT CALENDAR.
THE CHAIRMAN: IS THERE A SECOND?
MR. BUQUET: SECONDED.
THE CHAIRMAN: MOVED BY KING, SECONDED BY
BUQUET, FOR ADOPTION OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
THE CHAIRMAN: ANY OPPOSITION?
IT' S UNANIFOUS.
FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS HEARING TONIGHT THERE WILL
BE CERTAIN ITEMS WHICH WILL BE ADDED INTO THE RECORD.
THESE ITEMS ARE IN WRITING. THIS RECORD WILL CONSIST OF
THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS:
AN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION OF NEWSPAPER OF
GENERAL CIRCULATION OF THE NOTICE OF THIS PUBLIC HEARING
KEAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/CIty Council Meeting
August 6,1 987 6
Page 13
WHICH WAS PUBLISHED ON JULY 8TH, JULY 15TH, AND
JULY 22ND, 1987.
ITEM 2 IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING WHICH WAS MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE
LAST KNOWN ADDRESS OF EACH PROPERTY OWNER OF EACH PARCEL
OF LAND IN THE PROJECT AREA.
ITEM 3 IS AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TO PROPERTY
OWNERS IN THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND A LIST OF
THOSE PROPERTY OWNERS TO WHOM A NOTICE WAS MAILED BY
CERTIFIED MAIL.
ITEM 4 IS AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TO AFFECTED
TAXING AGENCIES AND A LIST OF TAXING AGENCIES TO WHOM
THE NOTICE WAS MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL.
ITEM 5 IS THE MINUTES OF THE M~ETING OF THE AGENCY
AND COUNCIL ON JULY 15TH, 1987, INCLUDING ITEM 3 AND 34
RESPECTIVELY, CONSENT TO THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SETTING
THE TI/~ AND PLACE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ITEM 6 IS A COPY OF THE REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 33352 OF THE CLAIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY
CODE, WHICH CONTAINS AN ATTACHMENT AND ARE A PART
THEREOF, THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1 FOR THE
RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, THE ENVORONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT ON THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1, AND
THE RELOCATION PLAN ADOPTED BY THE AGENCY FOR THE RANCHO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
ITEM NO. 7 IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAN PREPARED BY THE
CITY OF RANCHO CUfAM3NOA ON THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AND ADOPTED BY THE RANCHO CU(RMDNGA PLANNING
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
Page 14 7
OOMMISSION ON APRIL 8TH, 1987.
ITEM 8 IS A COPY OF THE RANC~O CUCAMDNGA GENERAL
PLAN o
ITEM 9 IS A COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY REPORT ON
REDEVELOP~NT PLAN AMNDMENT NO. 1.
ITEM 10 IS A COPY OF THE REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
PREPARED BY THE AGENCY AND TRANSMITTED TO THE CITY
COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 18TB, 1981.
ITEM 11 IS A COPY OF ALL CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
DURING THE FISCAL REVIEW PROCESS ON THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN IN AMNDMENT NO. 1.
ITEM 12 IS A COPY OF THE AGENCY'S RESPONSE TO THE
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED DURING THE FISCAL REVIEW PROCESS
ON THE REDEVELOPMNT PLAN NO. 1.
ITEM 13 IS A CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT FROM
ALL AGENCY AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
ITEM 14 IS A PUBLIC HEARING DOCUMENT HINDER WHICH
CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
A. CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRAR OF VOTORS CUCAMDNGA
SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
ELECT ION
B. CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRAR OF VOTORS, ETIWANDA
SCHOOL DISTRICT SPECIAL TAX AND APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
ELECT ION.
C. FIRE DEFENSE STUDY FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT MAY, 1987, FINAL REPORT
D. AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN CUCAMD NGA SCHOCE
DISTRICT AND ONTARIO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DATED
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
27
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987 8
Page 15
JANUARY 9, 1985.
E. LETTER, DATED SEPTEMBER 5TH, 1985, FROM THE
WILLIAM LYON COMPANY TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETIWANDA
SCHOO~ BOARD.
F. TERRA VISTA SCHO(3~ FACILITXES AGREEMENT, DATED
OCTOBER 10TH, 1984
G. FEMA 1980 RECORDS.
H. FEMA 1983 RECORDS
I. CITY OF RANCHO CU~RM3NGA ANNUAL TRAFFIC
REPORT, 1986
J. STATE-WIDE INTEGRATED TRAFFIC RECORDS SYSTEM
REPORT FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMDNGA, 1982-1986
K. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM3NGA, BUILDING AND SAFETY
DIVISION ABATEMENT RECORDS, 1978-1986
L. MINUTES AND TRANSCRIPTS OF JUI~ 17, 1987,
JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF RANCHO CUCAI{)NGA CITY COUNCIL
AND RANCHO CUCAMDNGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MEETING OF
RANCliO CUCAN3NGA CITY COUNCIL, AND MEETING OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
M. 75-MINUTE VIDEOTAPE OF RANCHO RIBDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA, FILMED JULY 29, 1987.
BEFORE I ASK THOSE WHO WISH TO SPEAK TO COME
FOIq{qARD, I WOULD LIKE ME. LAM, WHO IS A DEPUTY EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY,
TO INTRODUCE THE AGENCY STAFF MEMBERS AND REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY CONSULTANT AND COUNSEL, WHO WILL PROVIDE A BRIEF
PRESENTATION ON THE RRDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1981
Page 16 9
MR. LAM: I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE MR. BRICE
RUSSELL AND MR. JOHN BROWN.
MR. BR(~N WILL MAKE A BRIEF PRESENTATION REGARDING
THE PURPOSE FOR RE~OLDING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
MR. RUSSELL WILL MAKE A BRIEF PRESENTATION
REGARDING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT.
MR. RUSSELL: THANK YOU, MR. LAM.
SOME OF YOU WHO ARE HERE TONIGHT MAY ALSO HAVE
BEEN PRESENT AT THE ORIGINAL PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS
SUBJECT ON JUNE 17TH.
SOME OF YOU MAY HAVE RECEIVED A LATE NOTICE. I
EXPECT MOST OF YOU HAVE FOLLOWED THE NEWSPAPERS AND THE
FACT THAT THE REASON WE ARE HAVING THIS HEARING TONIGHT
IS THAT THERE IS SOME DIFFICULTY WITH THE POST OFFICE IN
GETTING THE NOTICES -- THE MAILED CERTIFIED NOTICES --
OUT TO PROPERTY OWNERS IN A TI~LY FASHION. TO ENSURE
EVERYONE HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING
ON AND COM~NT ON THE PROPOSED PLANNED ANENDMENT,
COUNCIL AND AGENCY HAVE DETERMINED TO BACK UP AND TRY
AGAIN, IF YOU WILL.
MY COMMENTS, I WILL TRY TO KEEP RELATIVELY BRIEF.
I WANT TO MAKE A FEW COM~NTS ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE
REDEVELOPNENT PLAN A~NDMENT ITSELF AND DISCUSS WHAT
THAT MEANS TO PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE PROJECT AREAS. AND
I ALSO WANT TO MAKE A FEW BRIEF COM~NTS ON THE
SUPPLEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.
AS INDICATED BY THE MAYOR, THE PURPOSE OF THE
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting 10
August 6, 1987
Page 17
MEETING TONIGHT IS TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
IF I CAN RAVE THAT GRAP}{IC, I WILL SHOW YOU THE MAP IS
CONSISTANT WITH WRAT WAS IN YOUR MAIL NOTIFICATION, A
MAP THAT SHOWS THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT AS IT
WAS ORIGINALLY ADOPTED IN 1981.
THE BOUNDARIES ARE ROUGHLY ETIWANDA ON THE EAST,
FOOTHILL FRE]~qAY ON THE NORTH, FOURTH STREET ON THE
SOUTH, AND AN IRREGULAR LINE AT THE SOUTHERLY PORTION
THAT FOLLOWS ARCHIBALD, AND THE NOR'IwHERLY PORTION
FOLLOWS RAVEN.
THE PROCESS THAT HAS BEING UNTERTAKEN TAKES
APPROXIMATRLY SIX MONTHS TO COMPLETE. AND, IN FACT,
THIS PROCESS HAS BEEN UNDER~qAY SINCE JANUARY.
WHILE THE DOCUMENT THAT IS BEING AMENDED IS
TECHNICALLY CALLED "REDEVELOPMENT PLAN," THE DOCUMENT
DOES NOT IN ANY SPECIFIC WAY INDICATE WHAT THE
REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IS TO BE, BUT INSTEAD INDICATED
THAT LAND USES AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL AND OTHER
ACTIVITIES OF THE AGENCY MUST BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE
GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY. AND IN POINT OF FACT, THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT HAS GONE THROUGH THE
PLANNING COMMISSION FOR A SPECIAL DETERMINATION AS TO
WHETHER THE PLAN AND THE ACTIVITIES PROPOSED THEREIN
CONFORM TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY.
RATHER THAN BEING A REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, RATHER
THAN BEING A PLAN, PER SE, THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IS
REALLY A DOCUMENT WHICH CONFERS TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
2
3
4
5
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
Page 18 ll
AGENCY THi~ AUTHORITY TO DO (~:RTAIN THINGS IN THB PROJECT
AREA TO PRCeiOTE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS. AND IT IS A
FACT THAT THE DOCUMENT IS THE AUTHORIZING DOCUMENT,
WHICH IS REALLY THE SOURCE WE NEED OF AMENDING THE
PROJECT.
THERE ARE THREE PRIMARY AREAS IN THe. REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN THAT WILL BE AMENDED.
THE FIRST ONE IS TO ADD TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT PRESENTLY IN
THE PLAN. AND THE ADDITION OF THOSE TO THE PLAN WOULD
ALLOW THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO FUND THEM, CONSTRUCT
THEM, PROVIDING THE FIRST OF THOSE IMPROVEMENTS ARE
IMPROVEMENTS TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND THE SECOND OF
THOSE IMPROVEMENTS, MAJOR ONES, ARE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
MULTI-PURPOSE COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL FACILITY WHICH
COULD INCLUDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, A LIBRARY FACILITY.
THIS IS -- THESE IMPROVEMENTS ARE ADDED TO THE
EXTENSIVE LIST THAT' S ALREADY IN THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN,
AND INCLUDES EXTENSION OF FLOOD OUNTRCL, STREET, AND
OTHER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.
THE SECOND PRIMARY ELEMENT OF THE PLAN -- MAY I
HAVE THE NEXT GRAPHIC -- IS TO CHANGE THE DOLLAR
LIMITATION IN THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ITSELF ON THE
NUMBER OF TAX INCREMENT DOLLARS THAT THE AGENCY IS
ALLOWED TO COLLECT FROM THE PROJECT AREA.
MANY OF YOU MAY NOT BE FAMILIAR WITH OUR
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'S FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES. ONCE A
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT HAS BEEN FORMED, A PORTION OF THE
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
10
11
13
15
17
20
21
22
23
2~
25
2~
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987 12
Page 19
HEW PROPERTY TAXES THAT ARE GENERATED IN THAT AREA FROM
A~SESSED VALUATION INCREASES FLOW TO THE R~.DEVELOpHENT
AGENCY UNTIL SUCH TIME A~ THE AGENCY HAS COMPLETED THE
PROJECT AND ALL OF ITS DEBTS ARE PAID.
THE GRAPHIC ON THE SCREEN INDICATES -- BELOW YOU SEE
A DARKER COLORED PORTION ON THE GRAPHIC -- WHICH
REPRESENTS WHAT IS KNOWN A~ THE FROZEN BASE FOR THE
PROJECT. THAT FROZEN BASE REPRESENTS A (2RTAIN ASSESSED
VALUATION LEVEL IN THE COLI~CTING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
TAXES WHICH ARE COLLF-C~ED BY THE COUNTY AND DISTRIBUTED
AMDNG THE VARIOUS TAXING AGENCIES. DEPENDING WHERE YOU
LIVE IN THE COMMUNITY WHEN YOU GET YOUR TAX BILL YOU
WILL SEE THAT YOUR PROPERTY TAX DOLLARS ARE DISTRIBUTED
IN A PARTICULAR WAY.
WHEN A REDEVW.OPMENT PROJECT IS FORMED, THE
ORIGINAL MAP RECEIVED BY THOSE AFFECTED TAX COMMUNITIES
CONTINUES TO BE THE SAME FROM YEAR TO YEAR. BUT THE
AGENCY BEGINS TO COLLECT A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY TAXES
RESULTING FROM ASSESSED VALUATION INCREASES IN THF.
PROJECT AREA, EITHER FROM NEW DEVELOPMENT OR FROM
PROPERTY R~RABILITATION WHICH WOULD CAUSE REASSESSMENTS.
AND UNDER PROPOSITION 13, FROM PROPERTY TRANSFERS, THE
PROPERTIES ARE REASSESSED ON TRANSFER, OR IF THEY ARE A
HIGHER VALUE AT THAT TRANSFER.
THERE MAY BE A LOT OF DISCUSSION TONIGHT ON TAX
INCREMENT EFFECTS ON YOU, AS PROPERTY OWNERS AND
INDIVIDUALS. FROM MY PAST EXPERIENCE IN HEARINGS OF
THIS TYPe., THERE IS A LOT OF CONFUSION ABOUT THE
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
13
Page 20
CONCEPT, BUT I WANT TO MAKE A POINT -- NOW, THE TAX --
BUILDING AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WHO COLLECT TAX
INCR~4ENT REVENUES IS NOT THE SA/~ IN ABILITY TO RAISE
YOUR PROPERTY TAXES. UNDER (RLIFORNIA LAW,
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES ABS(EUTELY DO NOT HAVE THE
AUTHORITY TO LEVY PROPERTY TAX. THEY CANNOT CAUSE YOUR
PROPERTY TAXES TO INCREASE. THE LIMITATION IS (RUSED BY --
ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND THE COLLECTIONS OF PROPERTY
TAXES BY PROPOSITION 13 DID NOT GO AWAY IN THE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA. AND NOW THE TAXES YOU PAY
WOULD BE THE SAME WHETaER YOU ARE IN A REDEVELOPMENT
AREA OR NOT IN A REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
IF WE CAN GO ON TO THE NEXT GRAPHIC.
THE THIRD AMONG THE PRIMARY AI~NDMENTS TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ACKNOWLEDGES A PROGRAM THAT HAS BEEN
IN EXISTENCE FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS.
THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AS IT IS PRESENTLY
CONFIGURED, THAT IS BEFORE THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT,
'AUTHORIZES THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO ACQUIRE ANY
PROPERTY WITHIN THE PROJECT .AREA BY EMINENT DOMAIN IF
THERE IS ADEQUATE PUBLIC NEeD SHOWN FOR THAT. I THINK
YOU ARE ALL AWARE THERE HAS BEEN SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT
OF NEW HOMES IN THE PROJECT AREA SINCE IT WA~ BEGUN IN
1981. AND THE AGENCY HAS -- IS PROPOSING TO AMEND THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TO REMOVE EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY
FROM RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES IN THE TERRA VISTA AND
VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITIES. WITHOUT AN AMENDMENT TO
THE PLAN, THE EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY WOULD REMAIN.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
9
10
1}
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6,1 987 14
Page 21
WITH THE AMENDMENT OF THE PLAN THE AREAS SHADED ON THIS
PARTICULAR MAP, THE NEXT ONE, WO~LD BE EXEMPT FROM
EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHO~/TY.
HAVING SAID THAT, I THINK THAT SUMMARIZES THE
PRIMARY POINTS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IN TERMS OF THE
AMENDMENT.
THE PLAN AMENDMENT ALSO, IN A MINOR WAY, EXTENDS
THE TI~ PERIOD FOR WHICM THE AGENCY MAY INCUR
INDEBTEDNESS OR UNDERTAKE REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES IN
THE PROJECT AREA. BY NOT CHANGING THE TIME LIMITS IN
THE PLAN, THE TI~ LIMITS ARE INCURRING INDEBTEDNESS,
THE AGENCY IS IN EFFECT AUTOMATICALLY EXTENDING THE PLAN
IN THOSE AREAS.
FINALLY, THERE ARE SOME R~LATIVELY MINOR EDITORIAL
MINUTES IN T~E PLAN, SUCH AS CORRECTIONS OF SPELLING
ERRORS. BUT I DON'T THINK I NEED TO TAKE YOU THR(EGH
ALL OF THOSE IN DETAIL.
WITH RESPECT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT,
THE SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, I
WILL KEEP MY COM~NTS ESPECIALLY BRIEF.
AT THE TIM THE ORIGINAL REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS
ADOPTED, THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WAS PREPARED,
AND MOST OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH
THE PROJECT WERE ANALYZED AT THAT TIME. THE AMENDMENT,
UNDER CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, HAS
TRIGGERED THE PREPARATION OF THE SUPPLEMENT TO THAT
ORIGINAL EIR, AND IN THAT SUPPLEMENT, VARIOUS AREAS OF
POSSIBLE IMPACTS WERE ANALYZED, INCLUDING' TRAFPIC AND
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/Citv Council MeetinR
August 6, 1987 15
Page 22
CIRCULATION, NOISE, PUBLIC SERVICES, LIGHT AND GLARE,
AND VISUAL EFFECTS. IN THE SUPPLEMENT TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, IT'S BEEN DETERMINED THAT
THERE ARE TRAFFIC, NOISE AND LIGHT AND GLARE IMPACTS
WHICH WILL REQUIRE FURTHER STUDY ON A PROJECT BY PROJECT
BASIS, ONCE THE DETAILS OF THE PROJECT ARE KNOWN.
WITH AVAILARILE MITIGATION, THOSE SIGNIFICANT
IMPACTS ON PUBLIC SERVICES OR VISUAL EFFECTS HAVE BEEN
DETERMINED AT THIS TIME. THAT CONCLUDES MY REPORT.
THE CHAIRMAN: AT THIS TIME WILL THE CITY
CLERK PLEASE READ ANY WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED IN
FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.
ME. AUTHELET: WE HAVE QUITE A FEW HERE.
THE FIRST ONE I HAVE IS FRCM THE RANCHO CUCAMgNGA
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION, AND I WAS REQUESTED TO READ THIS
INTO THE RECORD IN FULL.
IT IS ADDRESSED TO THE MAYOR MICHAEL.
"DEAR DENNIS: I UNDERSTAND THAT THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WILL BE CONSIDER/NG
VARIOUS AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY'S REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AT A
SPECIAL MEETING ON JUME 17, 1987. THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
DISCUSSED THE GENERAL CONCEPT OF THE RDA PLAN, AND
UNANIMOUSLY VOTED TO SUPPORT THE A~NDMENT RECOMMENDED
BY THE CITY. THE ENTIRE BOARD WISHES TO EMPHASIZE ITS
STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE USE OF RDA FUNDS FOR FACILITIES
WHICH ARE TO BE SHARED AMONG THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY, AND
FOR WHICH ULTIMATELY BENEFIT ALL RESIDENTS OF RANCHO
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting 16
August 6, 1987
Page 23
CUCAMONGA. ON BEHALP OF THE ENTIRE RANClIO CUCAMDNGA
CON/63NITY FOUI~)ATION BOARD, I WOULD LIKE TO EXTEND TO
YOU AND THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS OUR SUPPORT ON THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND OUR HOPE THAT ALL FUTURE RDA
FUNDS WILL BE ALLOCATED TOWARD THOSE PROJECTS WHICH
BENEFIT THE ENTIRE COM)ilNITY. SINCERELY, JEAN S.
BARTON."
I AM SORRY. I GUESS I ADDRESSED THE WRONG
MAYOR IN MY NERVOUSNESS. IT WAS ADDRESSED TO DENNIS L.
STOUT, MAJOR. I ' M SORRY.
OTHERS THAT WERE RECEIVED WERE FROM DIANE
WILLlAPP, FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY; MR. RICK GOMEZ;
TI~DTHY J. BEAGLE; DENNIS MICHAEL, FIRE CHIEF; A LETTER
FROM JACK CRUZ FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND
FLOOD CONTRCL; FROM ROBERT DUTTON, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE;
DR. KAY, JACK BORRIGAN; JOSEPH ANGIORIO; MICHAEL J.
ROMERO; TERRY SHULEGEL; STEVEN K. BELL; STEVEH FORD;
STEVE WHEATLEY; AND DUNCAN BUTINGER.
THAT IS ALL.
THE CHAIRMAN: MARK TBOSE LETTERS TO BE
RECEIVED AS PART OF THE RECORD.
AT THIS TIME ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OR HAVING ANY QUESTIONS
REGARDING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WILL NOW HAVE
AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
AS INDICATED EARLIER, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO
PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
PP. DIANE WILLlAPP: 7251 AMETHIST, RANCHO CUCAF~)Na
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint IDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987 17
Page 24
91701.
MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY: YOU RAVE BEFORE YOU A REPORT, DATED JULY 1987,
BY GARY L. STRONG, STATE LIBRARIAN. HE IS O(JTLINING THE
DETERIORATION OF THE QUALITY OF THE SCHOCL LIBRARIES IN
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. THESE CONDITIONS EXIST RIGHT
NOW IN THE SCHOCLS IN RANCHO CUCAMDNGA.
IF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY IS LOOKING FOR
EFICIENCIES IN SPENDING MUNICIPAL DOLLARS, I SUGGEST
THEY SPEND THESE DOLLARS Of JTSIDE OF THE SCHOCL SYSTEM.
ONE LARGE, WELL EQUIPPED MULTI-DIMENSIONAL LIBRARY
OFFERING SUCH FEATURES AS COMPUTER ACCESS FROM EACH
SCHOOL POPULATION THAN A DOZEN POORLY STOCKED SCHOOL
LIBRARIES COULD BENEFIT EVERY SCHOOL IN THE DISTRICT.
IT WOULD CERTAINLY BE EASIER -- THAT'S MY OPINION, MY
PERSONAL OPINION -- BUT IT WOULD CERTAINLY BE EASIER TO
PLAN ONE LARGE LIBRARY FOR COMPUTER ACCESS FOR RESOURCE
MATERIALS FROM EVERY SCHOOL THAN IT WOULD BE TRYING TO
UPDATE AND UPGRADE EVERY SCHOOL LIBRARY. THE PUBLIC
SCHOOLS DO NOT HAVE THE MONEY.
I URGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS OPPORTUNITY
AND BEGIN THE PROCESS OF ADOPTING Ar~NDMENT 1.
MR. MICHAEL: /41t. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE
AGENCY, DENNIS MICHAEL, FIRE CHIEF, FOOTHILL FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT.
AS I COMMENTED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON JUNE 17 IN
SUPPORT OF THE PLAN AMENDMENT, AGAIN I WOULD LIKE TO
REENTER THOSE COMMENTS FOR THE RECORD THIS EVENING.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987 18
Page 25
THE PLAN AMENDMENT WILL ALLOW O~3R DISTRICT,. BY THE
AGREEMENT THAT WE HAVE BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND THE CITY
AND FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, THAT WE SIGNED IN
1982, TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY CAPITAL REVENUE NECESSARY
FOR LONG-TERM FINANCING OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS THAT ABE
ATTRIBUTED TO THE RMDEVELOPMENT ABEA AND NECESSARY FOR
THE PROTECTION OF VITAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AREA.
IN ADDITION TO THAT, THOSE FACILITIES WILL
INDIRECTLY IMPROVE THE LEVEL OP OUR FIRE PROTECTION
SERVICES FOR THE ENTIRE COM~3NITY IN THAT THE EQUIPMENT
THAT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED IN ABEAS NOW OUTSIDE OF THE
RDA. THEY WILL BE M3RE CAPABLE OF SERVING THOSE ABEAS,
HOUSING, NEW FACILITIES, AND EQUIPMENT AND MAMPOWER
ESTABLISHED WITH THE REDEVELOPMENT ABEA.
MOST IMPORTANTLY, THERE IS A REAL POTENTIAL OF A
DISTRICT NOT BEING ABLE TO COMPLETE THE ENTIRE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM. WE HAVE BROKEN IT DOWN INTO TWO
PHASES.
THE FIRST PHASE IS A MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR PROJECT,
AND WE BELIEVE THAT WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED.
SECONDLY, I WOULD LIKE TO ADD THAT CURRENTLY THE
DISTRICT HAS RECEIVED REVENUE BY AGREEMENT AND
COOPERATION, BOTH OUR AGENCY AND CITY OF RANCEO
CUCAMDNGA AGENCY, TO PURCHASE THE COMMUNITY' S FIRST
TRUCK COMPANY WHICH SERVES THE REDEVELOPMENT ABEA AS
WELL AS EXPANSION TO ALL OUR EXISTING FACILITIES TO
ACCOMODATE UNTIL (INAUDIBLE) CAN BE COMPLETED. IT IS
KHAUSB SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
19
Page 26
THE ONLY SCNjRCE OF REVENUE THAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE TO US,
THE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY, TO PROVIDE THE LONG-TERM
FINANCING AND THE REQUEST FOR SUPPORT ON BEHALF OF THE
FIRE DISTRICT AND ITS BOARD OF DIRK'TORS.
THANK YOU.
MR. JOHNSON: I'M MR. JOHNSON, LIBRARIAN IN
CHARGE OF THE BRANCH LIBRARY IN I~ANCHO CUCAF~)NGA, AND
I'M HERE, ONCE AGAIN, TO EXPRESS OUR PLEASURE AND
SUPPORT FOR YOUR PLANS TO INCLUDE A LIBRARY.
AS YOU KNOW WE ARE HARD-PRESSED TO SERVE THE
ENTIRE COMMUNITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, THE YOUNG AND THE
ELDERLY, THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY. I WOULD ONCE AGAIN LIKE
TO EXPRESS MY APPRECIATION.
THE CHAIRMAN: THANK YOU ·
MR. SERANCA: MY NAME IS JACK SERANCA
(PHONETIC) 6211 PHELPS WAY, RANCHO CUCAMDNGA.
I WAS INVOLVED OR/GINALLY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PROPOSALS WITH THE CITY TO
ESTABLISH AN RDA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT.
I THINK IT IS CRITICAL TO OUR COMMUNITY, BASED ON
THE FACT THAT AFTER PROPOSITION 13, WE HAVE EXTREMELY
LIMITED FUNDS FOR SUCH SERVICES AS LIBRARY SERVICES FOR
OUR COMMUNITY.
THIS PARTICULAR AMENDMENT WILL ALLOW US TO DO
SOMETHING THAT IS CRITICAL FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR
COMMUNITY AND FOR OUR CHILDREN AS WELL AS ADULTS, AND
THAT IS TO POSSIBLY BUILD A MULTI-PURPOSE COMMUNITY
FACILITY WHICH WOULD INCLUDE LIBRARY FACILITY SERVICES.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987 20
Page 2 7
IT IS IMPORT/~NT, I THINK, TMAT PEOPLE RECOGNIZE
THAT THESE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES IN DISTRICTS DO ALLOW
US TO KEEP TAXES THAT WO~JLD OTHE]~qlSE GO TO T~E COUNTY,
FOR USE IN O~3R OWN COMMUNITY. I THINK THAT IS A
CRITICAL ELEMENT OF WHY WE SBOULD BE DOING THIS. THAT
IS ONE OF T~E SAFEST AND EASIEST WAYS FOR OUR COMMUNITY
TO APPLY THE FU~)ING FOR MAJOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS.
I REALLY BELIEVE THAT THIS PARTICULAR AMENDMENT IS
GOING TO INCREASE THE CAPACITY THAT OUR CITY HAS TO
PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE RESIDENTS. AND THAT, I THINK,
IS THE PRIMARY MOTIVATION FOR US TO DO THIS. I HEARTILY
APPROVE OF THIS AMENDMENT.
THANK YOU.
THE CHAIRMAN: AT THIS TIME WILL THE CITY
CLERK READ WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED IN OPPOSITION
OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT.
MS. AUTHELET: THERE WERE TWO LETTERS OF
OPPOSITION.
ONE WAS RECEIVED FROM WESTERN CENTER ON LAW AND
POVERTY, INC., DATED JUNE 17, 1987. SUBJECT: CERTAIN
OBJECTIONS TO THE AMNDMENT BASED UPON IMPACTS ON
FAMILIES AND PERSONS OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME.
THE SECOND LETTER OF PROTEST WAS FROM PARKER AND
CULVERT, ATTORNEYS FOR CENTRAL SCEO(X, DISTRICT AND
ETIWANDA SCHO(X, DISTRICT, DATED JUME 17, 1987, REGARDING
IMPACTS ON THE SCROCw. DISTRICTS, THE ABSENCE OF
CONDITIONS WITHIN THE PROTECTION AREA AND CERTAIN OTHER
OBJECTIONS.
KRAUSE SSORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/CIty Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
21
Page 28
THAT ' S IT.
THE CHAIRMAN: AT THIS TIM, THAT
CORRESPONDENCE WILL BECOME PART OF THE RECORD.
ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK IN OPR3SITION OF THE
PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OR HAVING QUESTIONS
REGARDING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WILL NOW HAVE
THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
MR. PARKER: GOOD EVENING, MEMBERS OF CITY
COUNCIL, MAYOR, AND MEMBERS OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
I'M CLAYTON H. PARKER, ATTORNEY OF PARKER AND
CULVERT. gdR OFFICE IS 1901 EAST FOURTH STREET,
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA. I'M HERE APPEARING ON BEHALF OF
OF THE CENTRAL SCHOCL DISTRICT AND ETIWANDA SCHOCL
DI STRICT.
I LISTENED TO THE READING IN THE RECORD OF
LETTERS. THOSE LETTERS WERE SENT PRIOR TO THE LAST
PUBLIC HEARING. I THOUGHT THEY WERE READ INTO THE
RECORD LAST TIME, AND I THOUGHT THE MAYOR AND CHAIRMAN
WERE READING THEM INTO THE RECORD TO BE INCORPORATED --
MATTERS CONDUCTED FOR THE LAST PUBLIC HEARING WERE
INCORPORATED IN THIS -- AM I CORRECT IN THAT?
MR. BROWN: THAT IS CORRECT. THIS IS A
COURTESY TO THOSE WHO MAY NOT RAVE BEEN AT THE PREVIOUS
PUBLIC HEARING.
MR. PARKMR: I UbE)ERSTAND THAT.
SINCE THEN YOU HAVE RECEIVED TWO OTHER
CORRESPONDENCES FROM THE TWO RESPECTIVE SCHOCL DISTRICTS
AS LITIGATION. AND WE CONTEST THE VALIDITY OF THIS
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting 22
August 6, 1987
Page 29
REDEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT.
I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE IN THE AUDIENCE HAVE
CHILDREN IN SCHOOLS AND ARE WORRIED ABO~JT THE PUBLIC
SCEOGLS. BUT IT IS CLEAN FROM THE THRUST OF THE PEOPLE
SUPPORTING THIS A~NDMENT THAT THEY ARE ASKING FOR
MATTERS INVOLVING DEVELOPMENT, NOT REDEVELOP~NT.
THE SOLE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION FOR REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCIES AND USING TAX INCREMENTS IS TO CLEAR BLIGHTED
CONDITIONS.
LOOKING AT THE MAP THAT WAS UP THERE WHEN THAT
SCREEN WENT DOWN, WILL DISCLOSE THAT AREAS WHICH ARE,
SHALL WE SAY, RATHER MODEST WITHIN YOUR COMr~jNITY AND
NOT WITHIN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. AND THE WHOLE
THRUST OF USING TAX DOLLARS, WHICH ARE BEING LEVIED BY
OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES [~OR OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES, IS NOT
FOR REDEVELOPMENT, NOT TO CURE BLIGHT, BUT TO DEVELOP
AND PROMOTE DEVELOPMENT.
I REPRESENT TWO ELEMENTARY DISTRICTS, AND THE
THRUST OF THIS REDEVELOPMENT AND CREATING FLOOD CONTRCL
CHANNELS AND ROADS AND THINGS LIKE THAT, IS ALLOWING
MORE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, MORE DEVELOP~NT WITHIN
YOUR COMI!3NITY WHICH WILL CREATE A GREATER IMPACT ON THE
SCHOCL DISTRICTS.
AND WHAT YOU'RE DOING IS TAKING MONEY AWAY AND NOT
GIVING IT. AND THERE HAS NOT BEEN A RESPECTABLE OFFER
TO EITHER SCHOOL DISTRICT TO SHARE IN THE SCHOCL
DISTRICT'S SHARE OF THIS TAX INCREMENT.
AND ON THAT BASIS, THE LITIGATIONS WERE FILED
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
27
.Toint RDA/City Council MeetinF,
August 6, 1987 23
Page 30
AGAINST THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT.
PRESENTLY, YOUR AGENCY HAS THE POWER WITHIN THE
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TO REMOVE PROM THE TAX BASE OF
OTHER PUBLIC ENTITIES APPROXIMATELY $10 MILLION A YEAR,
WHICH WILL FLOW TO OTHER PUBLIC ENTITIES FOR OTHER
PUBLIC PURPOSES. THIS PROPOSAL WILL SEEK TO INCREASE
THAT TAX AMDUNT FROM $10 MILLION A YEAR TO $100 MILLION
A YEAR. THAT IS A $90 MILLION A YEAR LOSS TO OTHER
PUBLIC AGENCIES FOR OTHER PUBLIC PURPOSES, INCLUDING THE
ETlqqANDA AND CENTRAL SCHO(L DISTRICTS.
PRESENTLY, YOUR DISTRICT -- YOUR AGENCY HAS THE
POWER TO HAVE A MAXIMUM DEBT OF $50 MILLION. YOU ARE
PROPOSING TO HAVE A MAXIMUM DEBT OF ANY ONE TIME OF
ONE-HALF BILLION DOLLARS, AGAIN, REQUIRING TAKING TAX
REVENUES FROM OTHER AGENCIES, PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT,
PUTTING GREATER INCREASES UPON THE ABILITY OF THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCHO(3~S.
THERE IS ABOUT A $6 BILLION SHORTFALL OF CAPITAL
FACILITIES IN THIS STATE. AND THERE IS INSUFFICIENT
MONEY TO PROVIDE CAPITAL FACILITIES. AND BY PROMOTING
DEVELOPMENT AND TAKING MONEY AWAY FROM THE SCHOC~
DISTRICTS, FROM THE STATE, YOU ARE AGGRAVATING THE
SITUATION. YOU ARE NOT HELPING. LIBRARIES, FIRE
STATIONS ARE NEEDED. BUT THIS IS NOT THE WAY TO DO IT
IN ASSESSING AGAINST TO PROMOTE DEVELOP{NT. YOU ARE
NOT HELPING THESE AREAS OF YOUR CITY WHICH ARE BLIGHTED,
TIRED, LOW INCOME. YOU ARE GOING OUT TO HAW LAND AND
PROMOTING DEVELOPMENT.
KHAUSE SHORTHAND REPOSING COI:tP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting 24
August 6, 1987
Page 31
THERE HAS BEEN NOT A SINGLE JUSTIFICATION AS TO
HOW YOU ARE HELPING BLIGHT. BUILDING A COMJejNITY --
CITY HALL, FLOOD COHTRCL CHANNELS, DEVELOPING RAW LAND
IS NOT ALLEVIATING EIGHT.
ON THIS BASIS THE LITIGATION MUST COMMENCE. WE
STAND READY AND WILLING TO SIT WITH YOUR STAFF, COUNSEL
FOR YOUR STAFF, TO DISCUSS AN EQUITABLE METHOD OF
ALLEVIATING THIS PROMOTION OF DEVELOPMENT ON THESE
SCHOCL DISTRICTS. DEPENDING ON THAT, WE ARE FORCED TO
PROCEED WITH THIS LITIGATION IN AN EFFORT -- BECAUSE
WHAT YOU ARE DOING TO THESE PEOPLE IN THIS AUDIENCE WHO
RAVE SCHOCL CHILDREN IS MAKING IT WORSE, NOT BETTER.
I WOULD BE GLAD TO ANSNER ANY QUESTIONS.
THE CHAIRMAN.' ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. PARKER?
THANK YOU, SIR.
MR. PARKER.' THANK YOU.
THE SIRMAN: AT THIS TIME, ALL PERSONS
WISHING TO COMMENT ON THE EIR REPORT WILL NOW HAVE AN
OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.
MR. PARKER: I'M CLAYTON H. PARKER, AGAIN,
SAME ADDRESS. ALSO REPRESENTING ETIWANDA AND CENTRAL
SCHOC~, DISTRICTS.
THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DOES NOT DISCUSS
HOW TO ALLEVIATE THE PROMOTION OF GROWTH UPON THE
DISTRICTS. YOU, BY USING THESE TAX REVENUES, YOU ARE
PROMOTING GROWTH AND DO NOT SHOW AN ADEQUATE METHOD OF
MITIGATING THIS GROWTH BY PROVIDING ADEQUATE CAPITAL
FACILITIES FOR THE TWO SCHOCL DISTRICTS.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
7
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987 25
Page 32
THE STATE SYSTEM OF PROVIDING WHAT IS CALLED
REVENUE, GENERAL FUll) OPERATION MDNEY, IS ONLY
SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE TEACHERS' SALARIES, BOOKS, THOSE
TYPES OF THINGS. IT DOES NOT PROVIDE SCHOCLS. THERE IS
A MASSIVE SHORTFALL OF MONEY TO SCHOCLS.
YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS
THE IMPACT BY PRCMOTING GROWTH UPON THIS DISTRICT, WHICH
YOUR PLAN DOES. WHETHER YOU ARE BUILDING -- PROMOTING
AN OP/GINAL SHOPPING CENTER, WHICH WILL PROMOTE JOBS AND
REQUIRE MORE HOMES TO BE BUILT AND MORE CHILDREN LIVING
IN THESE DISTRICTS, AGAIN, YOU ARE PROMOTING GROWTH AND
YOU ARE NOT SHOWING A I~THOD OF MITIGATING THE IMPACT OF
THIS GROWTH ON THE TWO RESPECTIVE SCHOCL DISTRICTS.
THE CHAIRMAN: ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS TI~H~ OF
MR. PARKER?
NR. PARKER: THANK YOU,
THE CHARMAN% AT THIS TIME I NOW DECLARE THE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA--
MR. BROWN: MR. MAYOR, MR. CHAIRMAN, I WONDER
IF JUST FOR A MOMENT, IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE RECORD,
WE HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY DURING THE HEARING, IF YOU
COULD MOMENTARILY JUST WITHDRAW THAT CLOSING OF THE
PUBLIC HEARING, WE"D LIKE TO RESPOND JUST BRIEFLY FROM
THE STAFF"S PERSPECTIVE TO SOME OF THE COMMENTS MADE BY
MR. PARKER.
THE CHAIRMAN: YES.
MR. BUQUET: THERE WAR A REFERENCE MADE TO THE
SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting 26
August 6, 1987
Page 33
JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, HOW MANY SCHOOL DISTRICTS
ARE AFFECTED BY THIS PLAN?
MR. LAM: FIVE SCBOCL DISTRICTS ARE AFFECTED
BY THIS PLAN, TWO OF WHICH HAVE NEGOTIATED --
MR. RUSSELL: MR. HAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE
COUNCIL, MR. PARKER HAS RAISED ISSUES REGARDING CERTAIN
LITIGATION MEASURES AND WHE~IiER THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES AN IMPACT ON THE SCHOOL
DISTRICT CAUSED BY THE PROPOSED PLANNING AMENDMENT.
I WOiJLD JUST WANT TO INDICATE, FOR THE RECORD,
THAT IT HAS BEEN INDICATED IN PREVIOUS DOCUMENTATION ON
VERY SIMILAR COMMENTS THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT IS A SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT, AND THAT THE SUPPLEMENT AND IN COMBINATION WITH
THE ORIGINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, DOES ADDRESS
THE IMPACTS OF GROWTH AND DOES IDENTIFY MITIGATION
MEASURES WHICH WOULD MITIGATE THE GROWTH DISCUSSED BY
MR. PARKER.
IN ADDITION, I WOULD POINT OUT FOR THE RECORD, AND
I KNOW THAT COUNCIL IS AWARE OF THIS, BUT AGAIN, FOR THE
RECORD, THAT AGENCY STAFF HAS INDICATED TO
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS THAT MITIGATE
ANY DOCUMENTED FINANCIAL IMPACT CAUSED BY THIS PROJECT.
AND I WANT TO BE SURE THAT THE RECORD REFLECTS THAT AS
WELL.
THE CHAIRMAN: ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS?
ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS AT THIS TIME?
AT THIS TIME I DO DECLARE THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/Cttv Council MeettnR
August 6, 1987 27
Page 34
MEANING CLOSED.
AND THE REDEVELOPMNT AGENCY, I ALSO DECLANE THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEANING CLOSED.
WILL THE AGENCY COUNCIL PLEASE READ THE
EXPLANATION AND ANY ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE
AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL?
MR. BROWN: MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, WE
RAVE COME TO A POINT IN YOUR AGENDA, THIS EVENING, WHERE
THE FORMAL ITEMS IN FRONT OF YOU INCLUDE A SERIES OF
RESCLUTIONS AND A CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE, WITH A DRAFTED
AMENDMENT, NUMBER ONE, TO THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.
THE FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS INVOLVES A
CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL EIR BY BOTH THE AGENCY AND
THE CITY COUNCIL. AND THEN THE COUNCIL WILL BE ASKED TO
MOVE ON TO AN ITEM WHICH ACTUALLY FORMALLY APPROVES
AMENDMENT NO. i TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. THE AGENCY
WILL BE ASKED TO FINALLY DO THE SAME THING, AND THE CITY
COUNCIL WILL RAVE FINALLY FOR ITS CONSIDERATION AN
ORDINANCE WHICH APPROVES AND ADOPTS A/~".NDMENT NO. 1.
FOR PURPOSES OF THE RECORD, I WANT TO POINT OUT
THAT IN EACH INSTANCE, BECAUSE A DETERMINATION WAS MADE
THAT A FULL AND FAIR OPPORTUNITY TO ALL PERSONS IN THE
COMMUNITY WAS NOT GIVEN DUE TO SOME POSTAL CIRCUMSTANCES
BEYOND OUR CONTROL FROM THE JUNE 17, 1987 MEETING, THAY
ANE IN FACT, AS A RESULT OF THESE FORMAL ACTIONS, ARE
BEING ASKED -- YOU WILL BE RESCINDING AND REPEALING ALL
OF THE RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES WHICH WERE MADE ON
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting 28
August 6, 1987
Page 35
JUt~: 17, 1987.
TBE CHAIRMAN: ANY MEMBERS OF THE OOUNCIL AND
AGENCY BAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RF_&~3RT?
AT THIS TIME THE NEXT ITEM OF BUSINESS WILL BE A
RESCw. UTION OF THE RANCBO CUCAMDNGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PLAN, EIR. COPIES OF THE RES(LUTION IS INCLUDED IN YOUR
PACKAGES.
IS THERE A ~IDTION TO ADOPT RESCL~TION R.A. 7010 BY
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY?
MR. BUQUET: SO ADOPTED.
MR. KING: SECONDED.
THE CHAIRMAN= MOVED BY BUQUET AND AC(~-PTED BY
KING TO ADOPT RESCLUTION R.A. 7010.
ALL IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
THE CHAIRMAN: THOSE OPPOSED?
UNANIMOUS.
THE NEXT ITEM IS A RESCLUTION OF THE RANC}tO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE AMENDED
PLAN AND RECOMI~.".NDING ITS ADOPTION TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
THAT RESC~UTION IS R.A. 87011.
IS THERE A MOTION?
MR. KING: I MOVE ADOPTION OF THE RESrw. UTION
OF R.A. 87011.
MS. WRIGHT: SECOND.
THE CHAIRMAN: MOVED BY KING AND SECONDED BY
WRIGHT TO APPROVE THE RESCLUTION, R.A. 87011.
KRAUSE SitORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/CitV Council MeetinR
August 6, 1987
29
Page 36
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL = AYE.
THE CHAIRMAN: OPPOSED?
UNANIMDUS.
AT THIS TI/~ ALL OF THE BUSINESS BEFORE THE
REDEVELOP/~NT AGENCY HAS BEEN CONCLUDED.
IS THERE A/4OTION TO ADJOURN THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY?
MR. BUQUET: I MOVE TO ADJOURN THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
MR. BRCWN= SECOND.
THE CHAIRMAN: MOVED BY BUQUET AND SECONDED BY
BRCWN TO ADJOURN THE REDEVELOPMENT MEETING.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
THE CHAIRMAN: OPPOSED?
UNANIMOUS.
THE CITY COUNCIL IS STILL IN SESSION ALTHOUGH THE
AGENCY MEETING IS ADJOURNED.
THE NEXT ITEM IS A RESCLUTION FOR CITY COUNCIL
CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WITH RESPECT
TO THE ADOPTION OF REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1
FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, AND MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS. A COPY OF THIS RESCLUTION HAS BEEN PROVIDED
TO COUNCIL MEMBERS.
THERE IS A MOTION TO ADOPT RESCLUTION NO. 87-4147
MR. BUQUET: MOVE ADOPTION.
MR. BR(IqN: SECONDED.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting 30
August 6, 1987
Page 37
THE CHAIRMAN: MOVED BY BUQUET, SECONDED BY
BRCWN TO APPROVE THE RESC~UTION CERTIFYING THE EIR BY
THE COUNCIL.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
THE CHAIRMAN: OPPOSED?
COUNCIL NOW HAS BEFORE IT THE CONSIDERATION OF THE
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
APPROVING AND ADOPTING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, A
RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND THE OFFICIAL
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SAID PROJECT AREA. A COPY OF
THIS ORDINANCE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN INCLUDED IN THE
COUNCIL MEMBERS' PACKAGES.
AT THIS TIME A MOTION TO AC(~RT THE FIRST READING
OF THIS ORDINANCE BY -- AND READING BY TITLE, READING --
THE FULL READING OF THE ORDINANCE WOULD BE IN ORDER.
MS. WRIGHT: SO MOVED ·
DR. BUQUET: SECONDED.
THE CHAIRMAN: MOVED BY WRIGHT, SECONDED BY
BUQ UE T.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
THE CHAIRMAM: EXCUSE ME. WOULD YOU LIKE TO
READ THAT DOCUMENT?
MS. AUTHELET: ORDINANCE 316-A, CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AND ADOPTING
REDEVSLOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1 FOR THE RANCHO
REDEVSLOPMENT PROJECT AND APPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 316.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
31
Page 38
THE CHAIRMAN: AT THIS TINE I WOULD REAC(~PT A
MOTION ON THAT PARTICULAR ORDINANCE FOR THE RECORD.
MS. WRIGHT: MOVE ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE.
MR. BUQUET: SECONDED.
MR. MARKMAN: THAT'S A MOTION TO SET THE
ORDINANCE FOR FIRST READING.
THE CHAIRMAN: IT IS SET FOR SECOND READING ON
AUGUST 13. IS THAT YOUR MOTION?
MR. KING: SECONDED.
THE CHAIRMAN: COUNCIL, SHOULD WE RESTATE THAT
MOTION AS IT AFFECTS THE RECORD?
MR. MARKMAN: I THINK THE RECORD REFLECTS IT'S
A MOTION OBVIOUSLY OF TWO READINGS, AND ADOPTION OF
ORDINANCES, THIS IS THE FIRST PRESENTATION. SO TONIGHT
IT IS BEING ACCEPTED IN THE FIRST READING.
THE CHAIRMAN: MOTION BY WRIGHT AND SECOND BY
BUQUET.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
THE CHAIRMAN: OPPOSED?
UNANIMOUS.
ALL BUSINESS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL HAS NOW BEEN
CONCLUDED.
MR. MARKMAN: YOU WANT TO ADJOURN THIS REGULAR
MEETING TO AUGUST 13, AT ANOTHER LOCATION AND ANOTHER
TINE WHICH NEEDS TO BE SPECIFIED.
THE CHAIRMAN: ALL RIGHT.
IS THERE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THIS MEETING TO THE
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
23
25
27
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
, August 6, 1987 32
Page 39
AUGUST 13 DATE AT LIONS COMIe3NITY CENTER -- THAT WOULD
BE THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER, 9791 ARROW HIGHWAY, AND THAT
WOULD BE FOR THE PURPOSES OF TAKING FINAL ACTION ON THIS
ORDI NAN C~.
MR. MARKHAM.' AND THE TI/{{, MR. CHAIRMAN?
THE CHAIRMAN z 7: 00 P.M.
MR. BR(3WN: SO MOVED.
THE CHAIRMAN: MOVED BY BRC~qN.
MS. WRIGHT: SECONDED.
THE CHAIRMAN: SECONDED BY WRIGHT.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE ·
MR. LAM: {41t. MAYOR, I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE
A COUPLE OF STAFF MEMBERS WHO WILL BE AVAILABLE AFTER
THE MEETING. IF ANYONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE
PROCEEDING TONIGHT, YOU WILL BE ASKING MR. JONES OUT IN
FRONT, AND LINDA DANIELS TO OUR RIGHT.
KRAUSE SHOIQEI'HAND REPOSING CORP
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
Joint RDA/CItV Council Meeting
August 6, 1987
Page 40 33
NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
I, SHIRLEY M. KRAUSE, A NOTARY PUBLIC WITHIN AND
FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY:
THAT THE SAID HEARING WAS TAKEN DOWN BY ME IN
STENOTYPE AT THE TIME AND PLACE THEREIN STATED AND WAS
THEREAFTER REDUCED TO TYPEWRITING UNDER MY DIRECTION.
WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL THIS 10TH DAY OF
AUGUST, 1987.
eY M. KRA~'SE
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP