HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987/06/17 - Minutes - Joint (Redevelopment Agency) June 17, 1987
CITY OF RANCliO .C~CAMONGA
REDEVELOP~NT AGENCY MINUTES
Joint Redevetotnent Agency/City Counc{1 Meeting
A joint meetinS of the City Council and the Redevelopsent Agency of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga met on Wednesday, June 17, 1987, in the Lions Park Community
Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucsmonga. Chairman end Mayor Dennis L.
Stout called the meeting to order st 7:07 p.m.
Present were Councilmeabers: Deborah N. Brown, Pamela J. Wright, Charles J.
Buquet II (arrived at 7:20 p.m.) and Mayor Dennis L. Stout.
Present were Agencymembers: Deborah N. Brown, Pamela J. Wright, Charles J.
Buquet II (arrived at 7:20 p.m.) end Chairman Dennis L. Stout.
Absent was CouncilmenbeT: Jeffrey King.
Absent was Agencymember: Jeffrey King.
Also present were: Executive Director/City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Legal
Counsels, John Brown and Ronald Van Blarcom of Best, Best and Krleger and James
Markman, City Attorney; Deputy Director/Community Deweloquent Director, Jack
Lem; Assistant Secretary/City Clerk, Beverly Authelet; Senior RDA Analyst,
Linda Danlels; PaA Analyst, Olen Jones.
B1. Chamber of Commerce to make presentation to Captain John Furschar of the
Sherlff~ s Department.
B2. Presentation of commemorative pins to CiL7 Councll and City Manager by
Dirksen of Charley Joint Union HiSh School District.
C1. Approval of Minutes:
March 18, 1987
March 24, 1987
April 1, 1987
April 15, 1987
C2. Authorization for ASency staff to execute Certificate of Conformance to 1)
Dr. Ebbs, located at 9765 Louise Way, Rancho Cucamonga and 2) Brian Bolda
located at 9776 E1 Paseo Drive, Rancho Cucsmonga. (0203-06 RIR)
MOTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Buquet to approve the Consent Calendar.
Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent).
D1. AGENCY ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING REFORT TO COUNCIL PREPARED IN CONNECTION
WITH THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMBNT PLAN ABND~NT N0. 1. (0203-06 RDA)
(1)
(2)
Redevelolment Agency Minutes
June 17. 1987
Page 2
(3)
(4)
(5)
RESOLUTION NO. RA 87-007
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCliO (IICAPI)NGA REDEVELOP~NT AGENC~
TRANSMITTING THE REFORT TO ~I~E CITY COUNCIL FOR
REDEVwm-OP~NT PLAN A~NDNENT NO. I FOR THE KANCHO
REDBVBLOPPgNT PROJECT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
HOTION: Moved by Wright.
Resolution 14o. RA 87-007.
seconded by Brown to accept the report and approve
Motion carried 4-0-1 (King absent).
D2. AU~ORIZATION FOR AGHNCY TO EXECUTE ~M~RAI~XJM OF UNDERSTANDING ( CO
RA87-15) HITH CHAFPEI JOINT UNION HIGH SCItOO~- DISTRICT. (0203-06 RDA)
~t)TION: Moved by Buquet. seconded by Wright to approve the Memorandum of
Understanding with Charley Joint Union High School. Motion carried 4-0-1 (King
absent).
D3. AUTHORIZATION FOR AGBNCY TO BX~CUTE r~MORAI~)UM OF UNDERSTANDING ( CO
RA87-16) WITH ALTA LOM& ELB~NTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (0203-06 RIR)
HOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Wright to approve the Memorandum of
Understanding with Alta Loss Elementary School District. Motion carried 4-0-1
(King absent).
E1. COUNCIL/AGENCY° IN A JOINT PUBLIC HEARING,
A~NDED PLAN AND CHRTIF/1NG THE -FIN&L SUPPLE~NT
REPORT. (0203-06 RDA)
ADOPT RESOLUTIONS APPROVING
TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
Mayor and Chaiman Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Mayor Stout
announced that the record contained the following documents:
An affidavit of publication from the Daily Report, a newspaper of general
circulation of a notice of the public hearing published on May 23, June 3,
and June 10.
A true and correct copy of Notice of -Public Hearing which was mailed by
certified mail to the last known assessee of each parcel of land in the
project area.
An affidavit of mailing to propert7 owners in the Rancho Redevelopsent
Project and a list of those property owners to whom a notice was mailed by
certified mail.
e
An affidavit of mailing to affecting taxinK agencies and a list of taxing
agencies to whom the notice was mailed by certified mail.
Minutes of the meeting of the Agency and Council on May 20. includin8 item
2 and 21 respectively consenting to the public hearing and setting the time
and place of the public bearing.
A copy of the report prepared pursuant to Section 33352 The California
Health and Safety Code which contains as attachments the Redevelop.eat Plan
Amendment No. 1 for the Rancho Redevelotment Project, the enviromaental
impact report on the Redevelop.eat Plan Amendment No. 1, and the relocatton
plan adopted by the Agency for the Rancho Redevelolment Proj act.
The preliminary plan prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on the Rancho
Redevelop.eat Proj act and adopted by tbe Rancho CucamonSa Planning
Commission on April 8. 1987·
A copy of the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan.
A copy of the preliminary report and Redevelolaent Plan Amendment No. 1.
Redevelopmeat Agency Minutes
June 17, 1987
Page 3
10. A coW of the report to Cit7 Council prepared by the Agency and tranmitted
to the City Councll on November 18, 198~.
11. A coW of all correspondence received during the fiscal review process on
the Redevelopmeat Plan Amendment Noo 1.
12. A copy of the Agency's response to the correspondence received during the
fiscal review process prepared on Redeveloppent Plan Amendment No. 1.
13. Conflict of Interest statement from all Agency Councilmembers.
Executive Director, Lauren Wasgerman, introduced Bryce Russell of Cunn,
Russell, Copenhever and Cc~ppny, Inc., who made a presentation regarding the
Redeveloppent Plan and the Enviromaental Impact report.
Mayor Stout asked the City Clerk to read any written communications received in
favor of the proposed Redeveloppent Plan.
City Clerk Authelet stated that several had been received. The first one from
the Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation, who had requested that the letter be
read into the record as follows:
"Dear Dennis:
I understand that the Rancbo Cucamonga Redeveloppent Agency will be
considering various amendments to the City~s Redeveloppent Plan at a
special meetinS on June 17, 1987. The Board of Directors for the Rancho
Cucamonga Community Foundation discussed the general concept of the RDA
plan and unanimously voted to support the amendments recommended by the
City. Tee entire Board wishes to emphasize its strong support for the use
of RDA funds for facillties which are to be "shared" among the entire
community and which ultimately benefit all residents of Rancho Cucamonga.
On behalf of the entire Rancho Cucamonga Community Foundation Board, I
would like to extend to you and the City Councilmembers our support of the
Redeveloppent Flea and our hope that all future RDA funds will be allocated
toward those projects which benefit the entire community.
Sincerely, Jeanne S. Barton, Chair, Rancho Cucamonga Ccmmunlty Foundation."
Other letters received:
Rick Oowez, 6856 Dakota Ave., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 917011
A. H. Reiter Developpent, Newport Beach California;
Foothill Fire Protection District, Rancho Cocamonga;
Department of Transportation, Flood Control, the Planning Division;
Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce;
Dr. Raweevan Kanokvechayant (known as Dr. K)
Mayor Stout then asked that all persons wishing to speak in favor of the
Redeveloppent Plan come forward.
Addressing Council were:
Dennis Michael, Chief of the Foothill Fire Protection District and
behalf of the Board of Directors, spoke in favor of the plan amendment.
on
Andy Swanson, Ontario Librarian, spoke in favor of the project.
Mayor Stout asked the City Clerk to read any written communications received in
opposition to the proposed Redevelopmeat Plan.
City Clerk responded that wo letters were received.
The first one, a letter of protest from Parker & Covert, Attorneys for
Central School District and Rtiwanda School District. The subject was
impacts on the school districts, the absence of conditions of blight within
the project area and certain other objections.
Redevelolment ASency Minutes
June 17, 1987
Page 4
The second letter of opposition yam fro~ Western Center on Law and Poverty,
Inc. The subject yam certain objections to the amendment based upon
impacts on families and persons of low and moderate income.
Mayor Stout asked for those wishing to speak in opposition to the proposed
Redevelopsent Plan or those hsvlns questions reSardinS the Redevelopsent Flan,
to come forward to address the Council.
AddresslnS Council were:
Clayton Psrker, Attorney for Central School and Etlwanda School Districts
requested staff to prepare an aSreament that 50X of the funds that normally
flow to the school district boundaries be paid to each school district. He
also felt that the E.I.R. did not address the impact on the schools and how
it would be solved,
Frank Costsilo, Superintendent of CucamonSa School District, also voiced
opposition to the plan.
There beins no further comments fro~ the publlc, Mayor and Chairman Stout
closed both the City Councll and Redevelopsent Publlc Hearings.
Discussion followed by ASency and Councilsambers.
RESOLUTION NO, RA 87-008
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCHO CUCANDR~A REDEV~LOP~NT AGENCY
~RTIFYING I~E FINAL SUPFLE~NT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMR~CT
REFORT FOR THE REDEVELOP~NT PLAN A~NDMENT NO. 1 FOR THE
RANCHO REDEVELOPr~NT PROJECT AREA
~3TION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to approve Resolutlon Mo. RA 87-008
certlfyins the flnal supplament to the Errviromental Impact Report. Motion
carried 4-0-1 (Kins absent).
RESOLUTION NO. RA 87-009
A RESOLUTION OF THE RANCRO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOP~NT AGENCY
APPROVIR~ THE PROPOSED REDEVELOP~ENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1
FOR THE RANCliO REDEVELOP~NT PROJECT AND REC0M)~NDING
ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCANORI~A
HDTION: Moved by Brown, seconded by Wright to approve Resolutlon No. RA 87-009
approvlns the proposed Redevelopaent Flan Amendment No. 1. Notion carried
4-0-1 (Kins absent).
Mayor Stout announced that all business before the Agency
he would entertain a motion for adjournment.
had been concluded,
~TION:
~eting.
p.m.
Moved by Buquet, seconded by Brown to adjourn the Redevelo[nent Agency
Motion carried 4-0-1 (Kins absent). The meetlns adjourned at 7:50
****** (See City Council minutes Section 'E")
Mayor Stout announced that the Connell was still in session although the Agency
meeting was adjourned. The next item of business for the City Councll to adopt
a Resolution certifyins the flnal E.I.R. (0203-06 RDA)
RESOLUTION NO. 87-289
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIHIN[I THE FINAL SUPPLEMENT TO
T~E ENVIRONmeNTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR REDEVELOP~NT PLAN
APENDMENT NO. I FOR THE RAN~O RNDEVELOPT~NT PROJECT
j
RedeveloFsent Agenc7 Minutes
June 17, 1987
Page 5
K)TION: Moved by Wright. seconded by Buquet to adopt Resolution No, 87-289
certifying the final E.I.R. with respect .to the Redevelopsent Plan Amendment
No. 1 for the Rancho Redevelolment Pro~ act and making certain findings. Notion
carried 4-0-1 (King absent).
Councilwman ~rlght stated that it appears the Council was rubberstamping
sceething, she explained that they had extensive negotiations and consideration
of this its in the past.
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE RANCliO
RBDzvsLOPMBNT FLAN ABNDMBNT NO. 1. (0203-06 RDA)
City Clerk Authelet read the title of Ordinance No. 316.
ORDINANCE NO. 316 (First Reading)
AN ORDINANcR OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAN(ItO
(IJCABDNGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTII~ REI)EVELOPI~NT
PLAN AI~NDNENT NO. 1 FOR THE RAN(}IO REDEVELOPI~lqT PROJECT
PDTION: Noved by Stout, seconded by Brown to waive full reading of Ordinance
No. 316 and set second reading for July 1. Notion carried 4-0-1 (King absent).
Hayor Stout called a recess at 8=00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:25 p.m.
with all Councilsembers present to proceed with the City Councll Agenda.
Respectfu/ly submitted.
Beverly A. Authelet
Assistant Secretary/City Clerk
Approved: August 19, 1987
1
2
3
4
5
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
June 17, 1987
Page 8
HEARING
JOINTR~EVEOP~NTAG~C~CITY
LOCATION =
DATE AND TI~:
LIONS PARK COMMUNITY CENTER
9161 BASE LINE ROAD
RANCHO CUCANDNGA, CA.
JUI~ 17, 19 87
7:00 P.M.
REPORTED BY:
SHIRLEY M. KRAUSE, C.S.R., R.P.R.
(NO. 3066)
QUALITY COMPUTER/ZED TRANSCRIPTION
-BY-
SHIRLEY M. KRAUSE
SBORTHAND REPORTING CORPORATION
3610 14TH STREET
SECOND FLOOR
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
(714) 686-1411 OR (714) 686-1419
**Original in RDA File.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
2
3
4
5
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2S
27
2a
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 9
APPEARANCES
FOR CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~DNGA
RECEVELOPMENT AGENCY=
400 MISSION SQUARE
3750 UNIVERSITY AVENUE
RIVERSIDE, CA 92502
AGENCY MEMBERS:
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS=
BEST, BEST & KRIEGER
BY: JOHN E. BR(TNN
400 MISSION SQUAE
3750 UNIVERSITY AVENUE
RIVERSIDE, CA 92502
DENNIS L. ST(IJT, CHAIR PERSON
PAMELA J. WRIGHT, VICE CHAIR
PERSON
DEBORAH N. BR(IqN, AGENCY MEMBER
CHARLES J. BUQUET, AGENCY MEMBER
DEBORAH N. BRC~/N
DENNIS L. STClJT
PAMELA J. WRIGHT
CHARLES J. BUQUET
r~I1ArTRR .qmRfPl, lAND REPO II~'TNG CO RP
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
27
28
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
,T~int RDA/City Council Meetin~
June 17, 1987
Page 10 3
JUNE 17, 19 87
MR. BR(TNN: LADLES AND GENTLEMEN, IF YOU COULD
BARE WITH US, PLEASE, WE'RE MISSING ONE OR ~0RE OF OUR
MEMBERS. WE 'EXPECT THEM TO BE ARRIVING ANY MOMENT AND
THEN WE'LL BE CONVENING THE JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY COUNCIL. SO PLEASE
BARE WITH US.
THERE ARE SC~4E CER~4ONIAL THINGS WE ARE DOING
TONIGHT, SO PERHAPS WE CAN GO AHEAD WITH THOSE UNTIL WE
HAVE THE FULL QUARUM FOR THE PURPOSES OF PUBLIC HEARING.
I WOULD LIKE TO NOW CALL TO ORDER THE RANCHO CUCA~4DNGA
AND THE REGULAR SCHEDULED CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
AUDIENCE, WOULD YOU PLEASE STAND?
(THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE WAS RECITED.)
MR. STC~JT= I WILL NOW CALL ROLL STARTING WITH
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
AGENCY MEMBER BROWN?
MS. BRC~q~ HERE.
MR. STCXJT= BUQUET, NOT PRESENT~
STO~JT, HERE~ KINGS ABSENT.
WRIGHT?
MS · WRIGHT = HERE.
MR. STC~JT| I WILL NOW CALL THE ROLE FOR THE
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
4
5
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 11
CI~ COUNCIL.
COUNCIL MEMBER BROWN?
MS. BR0~q:
KI 1~, ABSENT.
WRIGHT?
MS. WRIGHT:
4
HERE.
BUQUET, ABSENT; ST(lIT, PRESENT;
HERE.
(WHEREUPON AWARDS WERE RECEIVED BY CAPTAIN JOHN
PUTSCHERR AND LAUREN WASSERMAN)
MR. ST(XIT: MAY I HAVE THE RECORD NOW REFLECT
THAT COUNCIL MEMBER BUQUET IS NOW PRESENT.
MR. BUQUET:
MR. ST(lIT:
REPORTER HERE.
LET' S NOT.
WE HAVE TO.
WE HAVE A COURT
THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS THE CONSENT
CALENDAR. THE FOLLOWING CONSENT CALENERR ITEMS ARE
EXPECTED TO BE R(IJTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL. THEY WILL
BE ACTED UPON BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT ONE TIME
WITHOUT DISCUSSION. ANY ITEM MAY BE REMOVED BY AN
AGENCY MEMBER OR MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE FOR DISCUSSION.
THERE ARE TWO ITEMS ON FOR THE CONSENT CALENDAR TONIGHT.
IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD WISH TO HAVE EITHER OF THOSE
TWO ITEMS REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION?
IS THERE A FDTION?
MS. BROWN: SO MOVED.
MR. BUQUET: SECONDED.
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
.T~nr RDA/City Council Meetin~
June 17, 1987
Page 12 S
MR. STCWJT: ~0VED BY BR(7~N AND SECONDF. D BY
BUQUET TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE
MR. STOUT: OPPOSED?
(NO RESPONSE)
MR. STOUT: UNANIMOUS WITH KING ABSENT.
BOTH THE COUNSEL AND THE AGENCY ARE SIMULTANECOSLY
CONVENED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONDUCTING A JOINT PUBLIC
HEARING DURING WHICH THE COUNCIL AND AGENCY WILL TAKE
PUBLIC TESTIMONY PRIOR TO CONSIDERING THE ADOPTION OF
THE A~NE~ENT NO. 1 TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
I~ANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. THE PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF
THE HEARING IS TO CONSIDER THe- ADOPTION OF REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN, AMENDMENT NO. 1, INCLUDING CONSIDERATION OF ALL
OBJECTIONS WHICH MAY BE MADE AT THE HEARING TO THE
A~ENDED PLAN OR THE SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT PREPARED ON THE AMENDED PLAN. PRIOR TO
OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING, THE AGENCY WILL CONSIDER ONE
BRIEF ITEM RELATING TO THE TRANSMITTING OF THE REPORT
FR01 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE CITY COUNCIL.
THE FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS IS A RESCLUTION OF THE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOP~NT AGENCY APPROVING ITS
REPORT ON REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A}~NESENT NO. 1 FOR THE
RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND TRANSMITTING THE REPORT
AND THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A~NE~4ENT NO. 1 TO THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CUCAMONGA.
A COPY OF THE RESCLUTION AND REPORT TO THE CITY
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REI:~ORT'Wq~IG CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 6
Page 13
COUNCIL ARE INCLUDED IN THE INFORMATION THAT THE
REDEVOPMENT AGENCY AND COUNCIL HAVE ALREADY R~EIVED.
IS THERE A ~3TION TO ACCEPT THE REPORT?
MS. WRIGHT:
MS. BROWN:
MR. STOUT:
MOVE TO ACCEPT THE REPORT.
SECONDED.
MOVED BY WRIGHT AND SECONDED BY
BR(76'N TO ACCEPT THE REPORT.
ALL OF THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
MR. STOUT: OP POSED?
( NO RESPONSE )
MR. STOUT: IT'S UNANIr43US WITH KING ABSENT.
THE SECOND ITEM OF BUSINESS FOR THE AGENCY IS TO APPROVE
TWO MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE SCHOCL
DISTRICTS. THESE MEMOS HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY THE
CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOCL DISTRICT AND ALTA LONA
ELEMENTARY SCBO(L DISTRICT. ONCE FORMALLY EXECUTED,
THESE MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING WILL STAND AS THE
FOUNDATION FOR AN AGREBMENT.
IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE TWO MEMORANDUMS
O[~ UNDERSTANDING?
MR. BUQUET=
MS. WRIGBT:
MR. STC~JT:
SO MOVED.
SECONDED.
MOVED BY BUQUET, SECONDED BY
WRIGHT TO APPROVE THE TWO MEMORANDUMS OF UNDERSTANDING.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
MR. ST~JT: OPR3SED?
KRAUSE SF.K')R'Yq4AND RFH:)0RTTNG CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/Citv Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 14 7
(NO RESPONSE)
MR. ST(~JT: IT ' S UNANIMOUS WITH KING ABSENT,
THIS IS THE TI~ AND PLACE SET FOR THE JOINT
PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A~NI~t4ENT NO. 1,
HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS 'REDEVELOPMENT PLAN' TO THE
PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
PREPARED FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A~NDSENT NO. 1,
WHICH IS HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS sEIR'.
AT THIS HEARING ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK FOR
OR AGAINST THE PRCK~OSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND ON THE
EIR WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. I NON DECLARE
THE CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING OPEN.
AS CHAIRMAN OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, I NON
DECLARE THE REDEVELOP~NT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AS
WELL.
IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE R~CORD IN THIS PARTICULAR
MATTER, A NUMBER OF ITEMS WILL BE INCORPORATED INTO THE
R~CORD AS WELL AS THE ORAL TESTIMONY.
WITH RESPECT TO THE R~CORD, IT WILL CONTAIN THE
FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS= AN AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION IN A
NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION OF NOTICE OF THIS
PUBLIC HEARING WHICH WAS PUBLISHED ON MAY 27TH, JUNE
3RD, AND JUNE 10TH OF 1987. ALSO, A TRUE AND CORRECT
COPY OF THE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, WHICH WAS MAILED
BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO THE LAST KNOW ASSESSEE OF EACH
PARCEL OF LAND IN THE PROJECT AREA. THERE IS ALSO AN
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTDIG CORP
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 8
Page 15
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TO PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE RANCHO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND A LIST O[~ THOSE PROPERTY
OWNERS TO WHOM A NOTICE WAS MAILED BY CERTIFIED MALL.
THERE IS ALSO AN AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING TO AFFECT THE
TAXING AGENCIES AND A LIST OF TAXING AGENCIES TO WHOM A
NOTICE WAS MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL. THERE IS ALSO
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE AGENCY AND'COUNCIL ON MAY
20TH, 1987, INCLUDING ITEMS 2 AND 21, RESPECTIVELY,
CONSENTING TO THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SETTING THE TIME
AND PLACE FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING, WHICH IS TONIGHT.
ITEM 6 IS A COPY PREPARED PURSUANT TO SECTION
33352 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE, WHICH
CONTAINS AS ATT~IHMENTS AND ARE PART THEREOF, THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A~NENENT NO. 1 FOR RANCHO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
ON THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENEBIENT NO. 1 AND THE
RELOCATION PLAN ADOPTED BY THE AGENCY FOR THE RANCHO
REDEVOPMENT PROJECT. ITEM 7 IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAN
PREPARED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~3NGA ON THE RANCHO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ADOPTED BY THE PJ~NCHO
CUCA/~DNGA PLANNING COMMISSION ON APRIL 8, 1987. ITEM 8
IS A COPY OF THE RANCHO CUCA~DNGA GENERAL PLAN. ITEM 9
IS A COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY REPORT ON REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN A~NII~ENT NO. 1~ ITEM 10 IS A COPY OF THE REPORT TO
THE CITY COUNCIL PREPARED BY THE AGENCY AND TRANSMITTED
TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 18, 1881~ ITEM 11 IS A
COPY OF ALL CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED DURING THE FISCAL
REVIEW PROCESS ON THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTI'NG CORP
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
.Tnint RDA/City Council MeetinR
June 17, 1987
Page 16 9
THE CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED DURING THE FISCAL REVIEW
PROCESS PREPARED ON REDEVELOPMENT PLAN A~NIDMENT NO. 1.
ITEM 13 ON THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENTS FOR ALL
AGENCY MEMBERS AND COUNCIL MEMBERS.
NOW BEFORE I A~K THOSE WHO WISH TO SPEAK TO COME
FO1QZqARD, I WOULD LIKE/dR. WASSERMAN, WHO IS THE
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE RANCHO CUCAMDNGA REDEVEI, OPMENT
AGENCY, TO INTRODUCE THE AGENCY STAFF MEMBERS AND
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONSULTANT, AND COUNSEL WILL
PROVIDE A BRIEF PRESENTATION ON THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT.
MR. WASSEI~iAN?
MR. WASSERMAN: YES. /dR. CHAIRMAN AND ALSO
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, I WOULD LIKE TO INTRODUCE
JACK LAM, WHO IS THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; MR. JOHN BRCZqN, LEGAL COUNSEL FOR
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY; AND MR. BRICE RUSSEL. AND
MR. RUSSEL WILL BEGIN OUR PRESENTATION THIS EVENING WITH
A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AMENDMENT
AND ITS PURPOSES.
MR. RUSSEL: THANK YOU, MR. WASSERMAN.
MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL AND CITIZENS OF
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA~DNGA, AS HAS BEEN INDICATED BY
THE MAYOR IN HIS OPENING Ral4ARKS, THE PURPOSES OF THE
MEETING TONIGHT IS TO CONSIDER A PLAN AMENDMENT, AN
AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RANCHO
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. IF WE CAN HAVE A GRAPHIC, WE
KRAUSE SHORTHA~ID REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 10
Page 17
WILL SBOW YOU, AND I KNOW AS FULL AS THE ROC8 IS, IT
WILL BE DIFFICULT FOR YOU TO SEE ALL THESE GRAPHICS.
THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INFOI~IATION THAT WAS
PROVIDED TO YOU IN THE MAIL.
THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT HAS BEEN IN PLACE
SINCE 1981. THE BO~JNDARIES ARE RC~JGHLY ETIWANDA ON THE
EAST, FOOTHILL FRE~AY ON ~ NOI~TH, FOURTH STREET ON
THE SO3TH, AND AN IRREGULAR LINE AT THE SCI3THERLY
PORTION THAT FOLLOWS ARCHIBALD AND THE NORTHERLY POlarION
THAT FOLLOWS HAVEN. THE PROCESS FOR AMENDMENDING A
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN IS ONE THAT
IS SPECIFIED IN THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE
AND IS ONE THAT TARES APPROXIMATELY SIX MONTHS TO
COMPLETE. THE PROCESS FOR A~SNDING THIS PROJECT
ACTUALLY STARTED BACK IN JANUARY. WHILE THE DOCUMENT
WHICH IS BEING AMENDED IS CALLED T~CHNICALLY A
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, THE DOCUMENT DOES MOT IN ANY
SPECIFIC WAY INDICATE WHAT THE REDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IS
TO BE, BUT TO INDICATE THAT LAND USES AND OTHER
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL AND OTHER ACTIVITIES OF THE AGENCY
MUST BE IN CONFOI~4ANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY
OF RANCDO. CUCA~DNGA AND IN FACT THE AMENI~IENT HAS GONE
BEFORE THe- PLANNING COMMISSION FOR AN INDEPENDENT REVIEW
AND THEY HAVE DETEI~iINED THAT IN FACT THE PLAN AND THE
AMENI~4ENT THERETO DO CONFOBM TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE
COMMUNITY. RATHER THAN BEING A PLAN, REALLY THE
DOCUMENT IS ONE WHICH CONFERS TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY THE AUTHORITY TO DO CERTAIN THINGS IN THE PROJECT
KRAr1~R ,~It.T{")I~q't..1AND R!:~(')I~'TN~ Cr'I~P
1
2
4
5
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
2a
Jonit RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 18 11
AREA TO PRC!4OTE COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT. AND IT IS IN
PACT THE PACT THAT THE DOCUMENT IS AN AUTHORIZING
DOCUMENT WHICH IS REALLY THE SCARCE OF THE NEED FOR
A/~NDING THE DOCUMENT. THERE ARE THREE PRIMARY AREAS IN
WHICH THE DOCUMENT IS BEING AMENDED.
IF WE CAN HAVE THE NEXT GRAPHIC.
THAT IS ABSCLUTELY NOT WORKABLE. MAYBE I CAN --
IF WE CAN TURN DOWN THE LIGHTS.
WHAT WE HAVE ON THIS GRAPHIC IS AN ABBREVIATED
LIST OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ACTIVITIES THAT THE AGENCY
UNDER THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO
PROVIDE IN THE PROJECT AREA, AND MY EYES AREN'T GOOD
ENC(JGH TO READ THEM ALL. I APOLOGIZE. BUT THEY
INCLUDE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, MAJOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS,
SUCH AS FLOOD CONTRCL AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES, STREET,
SEWER, WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS, AND THINGS OF THAT
SORT. THE PROPOSAL BEFORE THE AGENCY IN TERMS OF
A~ENDING THE PLAN ADDS TWO ITEMS TO THAT LIST. ONE IS
THE INCLUSION OF FOO~ILL BC(JLEVARD IMPROVEMENTS WHICH
WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLAN AT THE TIME IT WAS
ORIGINALLY ADOPTED IN 1981, AND THE SECOND IS THE
PROVISION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF MULTIPURPOSE AND
COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL FACILITIES UNDER WHICH THE AGENCY
COULD ASSIST IN SUCH FACILITIES, AS A LIBRARY, FOR
EXAMPLE. SO THAT -- THE A~-NENENT OF THAT LIST OF
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, LIST OF ITEMS IN WHICH THE AGENCY
WOULD BE AUTHORIZED TO PARTICIPATE AND PROVIDE FUNDING
IS BEING A~ENDED IN THE PLAN.
J
1
2
3
4
6
?
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
la
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 12
Page 19
THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND CHANGE TO T~iE NEXT
GRAPHIC- THE SECOND AMENEMENT IS TO CHANGE THE DOI~LAR
LIMITATION IN THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ITSELF ON THE
NUMBER OF TAX INCREMENT DOLLARS THE AGENCY IS ALLOWED TO
COLLECT FRCM THE PROJECT AREA. MANY OF YOU MAY NOT BE
FAMILIAR WITH HOW REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES FINANCE THEIR
ACTIVITIES. BUT ONCE A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT HAS BEEN
FORMED, A PORTION OF THE NEW PROPERTY TAXES THAT ARE
GENERATED IN THAT AREA FROM ASSESSED VALUATION INCREASES
FLOW TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE
AGENCY HAS COMPLETED THE PROJECT AND ALL OF ITS DEBTS
ARE PAID.
THE GRAPHIC THAT YOU SEE, YOU SEE A LOWER DARKER
COLORED PORTION ON THE GRAPH WHICH REPRESENTS WHAT IS
KNOWN AS THE FROZEN BASE FOR THE PROJECT. THAT FROZEN
BASE REPRESENTS A CERTAIN ASSESSED VALUATION LEVEL AND
THE COLLECTION OF A CERTAIN LEVEL OF PRCeERTY TAXES
WHICH ARE COLLECTED BY THE COUNTY AND DISTRIBUTED AMONG
THE VARIOUS TAXING ENTITIES. DEPENDING UPON WHERE YOU
hIVE IN THE COMMUNITY WHEN YOU GET YOUR TAX BILL, YOU
WILL SEE THAT YOUR PROPERTY TAX DOLLARS ARE DISTRIBUTED
IN A PARTICULAR WAY.
WHEN A REDEVELOP/~.'-NT PROJECT IS FOI~MED, THE
ORIGINAL AMOUNT RECEIVED BY THOSE AFFECTED TAXING
ENTITIES CONTINUES TO BE THE SAra], BUT THE AGENCY BEGINS
TO COLLECT A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY TAXES RESULTING
FRClM A~SESSED VALUATION INCREASES IN THE PROJECT AREA,
EITHER FRCM NEW DEVELOPMENT, FR(IM PROPERTY
KRAUSE S/,R')R'Y'Y-TAND RI~PORTI'NG CORP
1
2
4
5
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 20 13
REHABILITATION WHICH WOULD CAUSE REASSESSNENTS, AND SO
ON, AND THAT REVENUE FLOWS TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TO BE SPENT B~K ON PROJECTS IN THE PROJECT AREA OR OF
BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT AREA. THERE WILL BE A LOT OF
DISCUSSION TONIGHT, I BELIEVE, ON TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING AND HOW TAX REVENUES ARE BEING DISTRIBUTED, SO
I WANT TO TAKE A FEW MINUTES TO GO INTO SCSE DETAIL ON
THIS POINT. IT IS IMPORTANT, THOUGH, THAT WHILE WE TALK
ABOUT TAX INCREMENTS, THAT WE DISTINGUISH BETWEEN NORMAL
PROPEI~I'Y TAXES, A PORTION OF WHICH IN A REDEVELOPMENT
SITUATION OR TAX INCREMENTS VERSUS THE ABILITY OF A
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TO LEVY A TAX, WHICH UNDER
CALIFORNIA LAW -- I WANT TO BE VERY PLAIN ABOUT THIS --
UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW, AN AGENCY CANNOT LEVY A TAX. IT
DOES HAVE THE ABILITY, HOWEVER, TO SHARE FOR A PERIOD OF
TIME IN THE PROPERTY TAX REVENUE STREAM GENERATED IN A
PROJECT AREA.
WE CAN GO ON TO THE NEXT GRAPHIC.
THE THIRD AMONG THE PRIMARY AMENDSENTS TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE REDEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS. THERE
HAS BEEN S(~4E DEVELOPMENT, SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT,
PRINCIPALLY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE PROJECT AREA,
AND THE PLAN IS BEING AMENDED TO EXEMPT FRC$4 AGENCY
EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY THE TWO PLANNED COMMUNITIES,
VICTORIA PLAN~D COMMUNITY AND THE TERRA VISTA
COMMUNITY, WHICH IS THE O~ER GRAPHIC.
AT THE PRESENT TIME WITHOUT THE AMENDED -- PUTTING
2
2
4
5
?
8
9
10
11
12
12
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 21
IT ANOTHER WAY -- WITHOUT THE A~NDMENT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, THE AGENCY NOW HAS UNDER THE PLAN
THE AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE ANY PRIVATELY OWNED PROPERTY IN
THE PROJECT AREA USING EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY. THE
FACT OF THE MATTER IS MOST OF YOU PROBABLY ARE NOT AWARE
OF THAT AND THAT IS BECAUSE THE AGENCY HAS NOT USED THAT
AOTHORITY SINCE THE PLAN HAS BEXN IN PLACE. AS I
UNDERSTAND AT THIS POINT, STILL HAS NO PLANS TO USE IT.
GIVEN THE NATURE OF THE NEW DEVELOPMENT AND THE FACT
THAT WE HAVE GOT QUITE A LARGE NUMBER OF NEW HOMES IN
THE PROJECT AREA, IT SEI~4S POINTLESS THAT THAT AUTHORITY
NEED BE CONTINUED FOR A NEW DEVELOPMENT OF NEW
PROPERTIES, AND THE RECOMMENDATION OF STAFF IS TO REDUCE
THE AREA IN WHICH THE AGENCY WOULD HAVE THAT AUTHORITY,
WHICH MEANS THAT IF YOU HAVE PROPERTY IN ONE OF THE
SHADED AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN SHOWN ON THE GRAPHICS AND
ALSO INCLUDED IN YOUR PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE THAT THE
AGENCY, UNDER THE Ar4~NDED PLAN -- THAT IS IF IT IS
APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL -- WILL NOT HAVE THE
EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY FOR THAT PROPERTY.
I WANT TO GO INTO SCME DETAIL ON THIS MATTER,
BECAUSE THE REDEVELOPMENT LAW REQUIRES VERY CLEAR
NOTICING AND THE GRAPHIC THAT WAS INCLUDED IS ONE OF THE
ELEMENTS OF THAT AND IS NOT INTENDED TO ALARM ANYONE,
BUT IT IS AN IMPORTANT AUTHORITY OF THE AGENCY WHICH MAY
BE NECESSARY IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AS A LAST RESORT.
AS INDICATED PREVIOUSLY, THE PLAN HAS BEEN IN PLACE
SINCE 1981 AND THE EMINENT DOMAIN A[~THORITY HAS NEVER
KRA[JSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 22
BP-EN USED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
THE OT~ER ITEM -- IN CONCLUDING MY PRESENTATION,
THE O~3~ER ITEM THAT IS UNDER CONSIDEP. ATION TONIGHT IS A
SUPPLr-MENT TO THE ENVIRaqMENTAL IMPACT REPORT. IN 1981
WHEN THE PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY PRCL~OSED AND APPROVED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL, THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WAS
PREPARED. SINCE THE AMENI~4ENTS TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN ARE I~ATHER NARRGq, THE INCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
IMPROVB24ENTS THAT I MENTIONED, THE CHANGE IN THE TAX
INCREMENT LIMITATIONS THAT I MENTIONED AND THE
LIMITATION -- THE NEW LIMITATION ON THE USE OF EMINENT
DOMAIN, A SUPPLEMENT TO THE ORIGINAL ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT WAS PREPARED AND THAT ALSO WILL BE UNDER
CONSIDEI~ATION TONIGHT. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
HEARING AND DEPENDING UPON THE TESTIMONY AND AFTER
COUNCIL HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO HEAR FRCK ALL OF THOSE
OF YOU WHO WISH TO SPEAR ON THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
Ar~.'-ND~4ENT OR ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, THE
AGENCY WILL HAVE ON ITS AGENDA A CONSIDERATION OF AN
ORDINANCE WHICH WOULD, IF ADOPTED, WC)ULD AMENDMENT THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN CONSISTENT WITH THE DISCUSSION WE
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
MR. STCUT: MR. RUSSEL, THANK YOU.
ONE ADMINISTRATIVE HOUSEKEEPING THING I NEED TO
NENTION BEFORE WE GO TOO MUCH FURTHER -- GENERALLY
SPEAKING, WHEN THE ROCI~ STARTS TO GET THIS FULL, THE
FIRE MARSHAL HAS A HABIT OF STOPPING BY AND INDICATING
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 16
Page 23
THAT THE RO01 IS TOO FULL. IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR THAT
CONTINGENCY, WE HAVE GALLERY EAST, WHICH IS ONE OF THE
ADJACENT RO0iS AND IT BA~ THE SOUND SYSTEM TURNED ON IN
THERE. SO I BFr. IEVE THERE IS ALSO SEATING IN THERE IF
THERE IS ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO GO OVER THERE RIGHT
NOW WHERE YOU COULD SIT AND LISTEN. I WOULD CAUTION
YOU, HOWEVER, THOUGH, WHENEVER THE TESTIMONY PORTION OF
THE HEARING -- DURING THE COURSE OF THE TESTIMONY
PORTION OF THE HEARING, YOU WILL HAVE TO COME INTO THIS
ROC[4 AND BE PRESENT AND COME FOIiIARD IN ORDER TO GIVE
YOUR TESTIMONY. THERE IS NO CAPABILITY FOR US TO DO
THAT BY REMOTE CONTR(L. SO, WITH THAT ANNOUNCEMENT,
THINK THAT WE ARE PROBABLY GETTING PRETTY CLOSE TO
CAPACITY. SO, IF WE SEE ANY MORE PEOPLE COMING IN THE
ROCH, PERHAPS YOU COULD ASSIST US BY USING GALLERY EAST,
AT LEAST TEMPOI~ARILY.
IN ORDER TO MAKE THE HEARING IN A MORE ORDERLY
FASHION, THERE IS A PROCEDURE THAT IS FOLLOWED. AND
BASICALLY WHAT WE WILL DO IS I WILL ASK THE CITY CLERK
TO READ ANY WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS WHICH WE HAVE
RIIIEIVED IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.
THIS IS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A RBIORD.
)iS. A~ITHALET: YES, WE HAVE R~CEIVED SEVEN
LETTERS IN FAVOR. THE FIRST ONE IS FRO( OUR OWN 9ANCHO
CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION AND THEY HAVE REQUESTED
THAT THIS LETTER BE READ IN FULL.
roDEAR DENNIS, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE RANCHO
CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY WILL BE CONSIDERING
KRAUSE SHORT}lAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
4
5
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 24
VARIOUS A~NDMENTS TO THE CITY'S REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. AT
THE SPECIAL MEETING ON JUr~ 17, 1987 THE BOARD OF
DIRK"TORS FOR THE RANCHO CUCAI43NGA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
DISCUSSED THE GENERAL CONCEPT OF THE RDA PLAN AND
Urt~NIMOUSLY VOTED TO SUPPORT THE A/~NEX4ENTS R~COMMENDED
BY THE CITY. THE ENTIRE BOARD WISHES TO EMPHASIZE THE
STRONG SUPPORT FOR THE USE OF RDA FUNDS AND FACILITIES
WHICH ARE TO BE SHARED A~DNG THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY AND
WHICH ULTIMATELY BENEFIT ALL RESIDENTS OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA. ON BEHALF OF THE ENTIRE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOARD, I WOULD LIKE TO EXTEND TO
YOU AND THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS (X]R SUPPORT OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND OUR HOPE THAT ALL FUTURE RDA
FUNDS WILL BE ALLOCATED TCXqARD THOSE PROJECTS WHICH
BENEFIT THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY. SINCERELY, GENES.
SPARTIN, CHAIR OF THE P. ANCHO CUCAK NGA COMMUNITY
FOUNDATION. ·
TO SAVE TIME WE HAVE ALSO R~CEIVED LETTERS FRCE4 --
WE CALL HER 'DR.'K" -- I WOULD NOT EVEN DARE MAKE AN
ATTENPT AT TRYING TO PRONOUNCE HER NAME. SHE ALSO IS IN
FAVOR, BUT SHE SAYS, =I REQUEST THAT MY PROPERTY BE
INCLUDED IN THE EMINENT DOMAIN EXEMPT CATEGORY AS
IDENTIFIED IN THE PROPOSED AMENE~4ENT NO. 1
LETTERS WERE ALSO R~CEIVED IN SUPPORT FRCH RICK
GOMEZ, FRO T A. H. RYDER DEVELOPMENT, FR(I~ THE FOOTHILL
FIRE PROTBXITION DISTRICT, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
FLOOD CONTRCL DEPARTMENT, AND OUR RANCHO CUCA~DNGA
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.
VDR rTDC~ Dt.?~t~mt3 AtT r~ t) c,Qr~ t)rn ?'kTr" ~"r~ o~
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 25
MR. BROWN: WE MIGHT NOTE AT THIS POINT, MAYOR
AND MR. CHAIRMAN, THAT MEMBERS OF -- COPIES OF ALL
lETTERS, EI=HER FOR OR AGAINST OR MAKING GENERAL
INQUIRIES, HAVE BEEN MADE PART OF THE RIXIORD AND
DISTRIBUTED TO MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY.
MR. STOUT: THANK YOU, MR. BROWN.
AT THIS TIME ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR
OF THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDeCENT WILL NOW HAVE AN
OPPOI~I'UNITY TO SPEAK.
FOR THE RIIIORD, WDULD YOU PIEJ%SE IDENTIFY YOURSELF
AND INDICATE YOUR ADDRESS.
MR. DIRKSEN: MR. CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE
AGENCY AND STATE COUNCIL ALSO, I GUESS, SINCE IT IS THE
JOINT PUBLIC HEARING -- CHIEF MICHAEL WITH FOOTHILL FIRE
DISTRICT.
ON BEHALF OF THE FOOTHILL FIRE DISTRICT AND ITS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THE PLA~/s.~ENIDi4ENT, AS CURRENTLY
STATED, WILL ALLOW C~R DISTRICT TO CONTINUE WITH
PROVIDING THE ADEQUATE LEVEL OF FIRE PROTBETION
NECESSARY IN THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA. THE DISTRICT HAS
ONLY ONE FINANCING MECHANISM TO INCUR BOND INDEBTEDNESS
AND THAT IS REDEVELOPMEHT AGENCY' S AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
DISTRICT AND THE AGENCY AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAE4ONGA
THAT WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1982. THE RfI~OVAL OF THE CAP OR
THE INCREASING OF THE A~DUNT OF TAX INCRENENTS ANNUALLY
AND ALSO THE A~DUNT OF ANY ONE YEAR AND THE TOTAL CAP
WILL ALLOW US TO COMPLETE OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, I~B/
Page 26 19
PROJECT FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT AREA. WITHOUT THAT, IT IS
GOING TO BE DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE THAT GOAL. SO IN THE
INTE~ OF FIRE PROTECTION AND LIFE SAFETY IN THE
COMMUNITY, WE ARE VERY MUCH IN SUPPORT OF THE PLAN.
THANK YOU.
MR. STCIIT: THANK YOU, CHIEF MICHAEL.
MR. SWANSON: MR. MAYOR, COUNCIL, AGENCY
MEMBERS. I'M THE -- ANDY SWANSON, LIBRARIAN AT THE
RANCHO CUCAIO NGA BRANCH LIBRARY -- AND I WOULD LIKE TO
EXPRESS MY PLEASURE AND SUPPORT AND THAT OF THE COUNTY
LIBRARY ADMINISTRATION'S SUPPORT AND PLEASURE AT THE
PLAN AND AT THE POSSIBILITY OF EXPANDING ODR LIBRARY
SERVICE. AS YOU ALL KNOW, COR LIBRARY SERVICE HAS NOT
GROWN WITH THE COMMUNITY, AND WE DO COR BEST WITH WHAT
RESCXIRCES WE HAVE. WE DON'T HAVE THE RESOjRCES
NECESSARY. ANYWAY, THANK YOU.
MR. ST(lIT: THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME I WILL ASK THE CITY CLERK
TO READ ANY WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVED IN
OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN.
MS. AUTHALET: YES.
WE HAVE RECEIVED TWO LETTERS OF OPPOSITION FRO(
WESTERN CENTER ON LAW AND PROPERTY INC., DATED JUNE 17,
1987, THE SUBJECT: CERTAIN OBJECTIONS TO THE AMENEMENT
BASED UPON IMPACT ON FAMILIES AND PERSONS OF LOW AND
MODERATE INCOMES. A LETTER OF PROTEST, AND COPIES HAVE
BEEN FURNISHED TO ALL AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS,
FRO( THE ATTORI~YS FOR CENTRAL SCHOCL DISTRICT AND
K11.s, rTRR .cI',,.II""IRq~..I'ANI'I Rl~)rll~ff~T1q~ CrlRP
1
2
3
4
5
?
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
2S
27
2S
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 20
Page 27
ETIWANDA SCHOCL DISTRICT, DATED JUE~ 17, 19 87, REGARDING
IMPACT ON THE SCHOCL DISTRICTS, THE ABSENCE OF
CONDITIONS OF BLIGI~T WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND CERTAIN
OTHER OBJECT IONS.
MR. STC~JT= ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME I WILL
ASK THAT ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAR IN OPPOSITION TO
THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OR RAVING QUESTIONS
REGARDING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, PLEASE COME
FOI~qARD AND GIVE YOUR TESTIMONY.
MR. PARKER: MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE
COUNCIL, MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, I'M
CLAYTON PARKER. I DID FILE THIS LETTER WITH YOU.
REPRESENTING THE CENTRAL SCHOCL DISTRICT AND THE
ETIWANDA SCHOCL DISTRICT AND PORTIONS OF BOTH DISTRICTS
ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA.
I KNOW YOU ARE PLACING MY LETTER AS PART OF THE
RECORD. HOWEVER, I WOULD LIKE TO SUPPLEMENT THAT.
TYPICALLY, IN A MATTER SUCH AS THIS WHERE THERE IS SUCH
A MASSIVE CHANGE IN A PROJECT AREA AND IT IS NOT
GEOGRAPHICALLY, IT IS A MASSIVE CHANGE IN THE AMOUNT OF
MONEY THAT THIS AGENCY PRC~OSES TO TAKE (XJT OF TAXES
WHICH WOULD OTHEI~qISE FLOW TO SCHO(L DISTRICTS, THERE
kKIJLD BE A SET=LEMENT OFFER WHEREBY THE DISTRICTS WOULD
RECEIVE A SUBSTANTIAL SUMS OF MONEY THRCtlGHOUT THE
PROJECT PERIOD TO COMPENSATE THEM FOR THE IMPACT ON THE
DISTRICT. THIS PROJECT OF YOURS IS NOT A REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT. IT IS NArD THAT AND IT WAS NOT LEGALLY
ATTACKED WHEN IT WAS ESTABLISHED. IT IS STRICTLY A
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
4
5
?
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Mee~ng
June 17, 1987
Page 28
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. YOU CAN DRIVE THRCUGHOOT THIS
PROJECT AREA AND YOU SEE VAST EMPTY PROPERTIES. YOU SEE
BRAND NEW BOUSING. THOSE THINGS ARE TAKING PLACE. THIS
IS NOT B~IGHT AND WHAT THIS DOES BY RAISING THE AMOUNT
OF MONEY THAT THE AGENCY CAN TAKE PER YEAR AND THE
AMOUNT OF INDEBTEDNESS THAT THEY CAN TAKE PER YEAR IS
JUST ~:C2LERATING THE GR(TNTH IN THE WHOLE COMMUNITY,
BOTH WITHIN AND WITHOUT THE PROJECT AREA. THIS GR(TNTH
WILL ACCELERATE THE NEED FOR CAPITAL (YjTLAY FOR THE
SCHOCL DISTRICTS AND DURING THE WHOLE PROJECT AREA, NOT
JUST THE 20 YEARS BUT 40 YEARS. SCBO(LS WILL BE BUILT
AND HAVE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED THERE DURING THAT PERIOD OF
TIME. AND I WOULD -- I DID FILE WITH THE -- WITH YOUR
AGENCY A RECENT DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEAL AND
WHERE THEY SET ASIDE A PROJECT AREA BECAUSE BASICALLY
THAT PROJECT WAS ATTEMPTING TO DO THE SAME THING YOURS
DOES -- PRCr4OTE GROWTH. IT DOES NOT ELIMINATE BLIGHT.
IF YOU LOOK AT THE MAP THAT HAS BEBN TAKEN DOWN -- IF
YOU LOOK AT ALL OF THE, SHALL WE SAY, TIRED AREAS OF THE
ORIGINAL COMMUNITIES OF CUCA~DNGA, ETIWANDA, ARE
EXEMPTED FRCN THE PROJECT AREA. YOU ARE NOT TRYING TO
CURE -- THAT MAY BE BLIGHT THERE. ALL YOU ARE TRYING TO
DO IS TO ACCELERATE DEVELOPMENT AND THAT -- I ALSO
ATTACHED A SUMMARY OF AN ECONOe~IC BASIS FOR -- PREPARED
BY THE CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO WHERE AN URBAN ECONOMIST
TIED AN IMPACT OF NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON
INCREASED NEED FOR HOUSING. THAT STUDY IS EQUALLY
APPLICABLE TO WHAT IS OCCURRING IN THIS COMMUNITY. OUR
1
2
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2S
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 22
Page 29
REQUEST TONIGHT IS THAT STAFF BE DIRECTED TO PREPARE AN
AGREEMENT WHEREBY 50 PERCENT OP THE FUNDS THAT WOULD
NORMALLY FLOW TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS FRC$4 INCREASED
ASSESSED VALUATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA AND WITHIN
THEIR INDIVIDUAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOUNDARIES BE DIRECTED
TO THE SCHO(L DISTRICTS. THE DISTRICTS WOULD AGREE TO
SPEND THAT MONEY FOR CAPITAL OUTLAY TO HELP SCLVE THAT
GRCWTH. AND THAT DOES LEAD TO THE AGENCY 50 PERCENT OF
THE MONIES WHICH WOULD NOI~IALLY FLOW TO SCHOCL DISTRICTS
FOR USE FOR YOUR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. THERE HAVE BEEN
RECENT SETTLEMENTS ON REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS THRC~JGHOUT
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, WHATEVER. IN
EVERY CASE, TO MY KNOWLEDGE -- I HAVE NEGOTIATED A
SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER OF THEM -- THE OFFERS OF MAKING AN
ARRANGEMENT WITH THE SCHO(L DISTRICTS HAS BEEN
SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER AND THE NEGOTIATIONS THRC~3GH THE
LAST SEVERAL MONTHS HAVE BEEN FRUITLESS. THE DISTRICTS
HAVE HAD SCr4E ORAL OFFERS KIND OF ARGJND LIKE THIS,
NEVER A WRITTEN OFFER. WE DO HAVE A WRITTEN OFFER
BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TONIGHT, AND I WOULD SUGGEST IF YOU, COUNCIL AND BOARD,
WOULD LIKE TO APPROVE THAT ORDINANCE THAT THEY INSTRUCT
THE STAFF IN CURPJ~1TLY PREPARING SUCH AND AGRE~I4ENT.
NOW, I WOULD BE PLEASED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS WITH
REGARD --
ONE MORE QUESTION. THE SUPPLEMENT EIR DOES NOT
ADDRESS THE IMPACT ON SCHOCLS, HOW THEY ARE GOING TO
FINANCE THE NEED OF SCHOOLS WHICH THE INCREASED PRClMOTED
1
2
4
5
6
?
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2S
27
2a
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 30 23
GROWTH, WHICH YOU ARE PRCNOTING IP YOU ADOPT THIS
TONIGHT, WILL BE SOLVED. I THANK YOU.
YOU READ THE TIMES, WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE
LEGISLATURE. THE STATE SCHO(L PROGRAM IS I~JNNING CUT OF
MONEY THIS AUGUST, AND THEY NEED THE MONEY IN ORDER TO
ACCOMMODATE THE GROWTH WHICH YOU ARE INDUCING. I WILL
PLEASE AN~NER ANY QUESTIONS.
MR. STCUT: ANY QUESTIONS OF MR. PARKER?
MR. BUQUET: SIR, MR. PARKER, WHERE ARE YOUR
LAW OFFICES LOCATED?
MR. PARKER: SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA. WE
REPRESENT ABC~JT 14 OR 15 SCHO(L DISTRICTS IN THIS
COUNTY, HOWEVER.
MR. BUQUET: THANK YOU.
MR. SARCELLA: MY NAME IS JOHN SARCELLA AND
I'M SUPERINTENDANT OF THE CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT. WE
HAVE NOT HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE SUPPLEMENTAL
EIR REPORT THAT HAS BEEN S~3BMITTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL,
BUT ALL OF THE MITIGATION OFFERS TEAT HAVE BEEN
SUBMITTED TO THE CUCAMOI~3A SCHOOL DISTRICT ARE
INADEQUATE TO MEET CUR NEEDS, AND AT YOUR NEXT CITY
COUNCIL MEETING WE WILL HAVE A MUCH MORE DETAILED
RESPONSE TO CUR CONCERNS ABCUT THE MITIGATION OFFERS
THAT HAVE BEEN PRESENTED. THANK YOU.
MR. STCUT= ALL RIGHT. ONE ADDITIONAL TOPIC
AND FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT -- WELL, JUST BASICALLY
COMMENTING ON THE PLAN, THERE IS ALSO THE OPPORTUNITY,
AS HAS BEBlq INDICATED EARLIER TO YOU, COMMENT ON THE
K~ArTRR RT4(')R~I-TA~aT') ~RPt')]~T'TN('; CnRP
1
2
3
4
5
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2~
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 24
Page 31
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND THERE HAVE BEEN S(14E
COMMENTS, BUT THAT TOPIC IS ALSO -- I WANT TO MAKE SURE
EVERYBODY UNDERSTANDS YOU CAN ALSO COMMENT ON THAT
TOPIC.
OKAY. THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED WITH RESPECT
TO CITY COUNCIL. AND AS AGENCY CHAIRMAN OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, I DECLARE THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AS WELL. AT THIS TIME I WOULD ASK
THE AGENCY COUNSEL TO GIVE US A BRIEF EXPLANATION OF THE
NEXT ACTIONS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE AGENCY AND THE CITY
COU NCI L.
MR. BR(7~N: MR. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCILS MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, WE HAVE REACHED A POINT IN TONIGHT"S JOINT
PUBLIC HEARING WHEREIN THE FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS, THE
STAFF IS PREPARED TO FIRST ANGER ANY INQUIRIES OR
QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE AS TO THE SUPPLEMENTS TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT OR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. FOLLOWING THAT THE STAFF IS
RECOMMENDING FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION A RES(LUTION OF THE
AGENCY'S CERTIFYING THE SUPPLEMENT-- THE FINAL
SUPPLEMENTAL EIR. THE AGENCY IS ALSO BEING RECOMMENDED
TO APPROVE THE AMENDED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND TO
RECOMMEND THE ADOPTION OF THAT AMENDMENT BY THE CITY
COUNCIL. AND, FINALLY, THE CITY COUNCIL IS ALSO BEING
ASKED TO CERTIFY THE FINAL EIR WITH RESPECT TO AMENDMENT
NO. 1, AND THE COUNCIL IS BEING ASKED TO INTRODUCE ON
FIRST READING AN ORDINANCE APPROVING REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
KRA[TSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 32 2B
NO. 1 FOR THE RANCHO CUCA~0NGA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
MR. STOUT: ANY MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL OR
AGENCY HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT?
MR. BR(TNN.. I WOULD LIKE TO OFFER A COMMENT,
IF I COULD, JUST FOR A ~OMENT ON THE SUBJECT OF THE
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT WHICH WAS
ALLUDED TO DURING THE COURSE OF PUBLIC TESTI~DNY.
I WANT TO NOTE, FOR PURPOSES OF THE RBIORD, THAT,
OF COURSE, EXTENSIVE COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, AND WRITTEN
MATERIAL WAS R~CEIVED PRINCIPALLY FRCM THOSE CONCERNED
AB(~JT IMPACTS ON SCHOCLS. THAT MATERIAL WAS EXTENSIVELY
REVIEWED AND ANALYZED BY STAFF AND BY YOUR CONSULTANTS
AND WRITTEN RESPONSES WERE PREPARED AND INCORPORATED
INTO THE FINAL EIR WHICH DO, IN THE OPINION OF STAFF,
ADDRESS BOTH THE CONCEPT OF IMPACT ON SCHO(L DISTRICTS,
AS WELL AS THE CONCEPT OF MITIGATION MEASURES.
MR. STCXJT: WOULD IT BE APPROPRIATE THEN TO
DISCUSS THE RESCLUTION WITH RESPECT THE ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT FIRST.
MR. BRCWN=
MR. STOUT=
YES.
DOES ANYBODY CARE TO MAKE A MOTION
WITH RESPECT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT?
MR. BUQUET=
MS. BROWN =
MR. STC~JT:
TO APPROVE THE RESCLUTION CERTIFYING THE FINAL EIR.
THOSE IN FAVOR?
SO MOVED ·
AND SECONDED.
MOVED BY BUQUBT, SECONDED BY BROWN
ALL
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 26
Page 33
ALL: AYE.
MR. STOUT: OPPOSED?
( NO RESPONSE. )
MR. STOUT: UNANIMOUS- ONE ABSENT, KING.
ALL RIGHT. ~{AT CONCLUDES THE AGENCY BUSINESS; IS
THAT CORRBCT?
MR. BRC{~TN: THERE IS ONE ADEKTIONAL ITEM,
MR. MAYOR, WHICH IS A RESCLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY APPROVING THE A~NEMENT PLAN RBCOMMENDING THE
ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
MR. STOUT: C8, I ' M SORRY. IS THERE A MOTION
WITH RESPECT TO THAT RES(LUTION?
MS. BRCTNN:
MS. WRIGHT:
MR. STOUT:
SO MOVED.
SECONDED.
MOVED BY BRGqN AND SECONDED BY
WRIGHT TO APPROVE THE RES(LUTION ON THE A~NDED
A~NDMENT TO THE PLAN.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
MR. STOUT: OPPOSED?
( NO RESPONSE. )
MR. STOUT: UNANIMOUS WITH KING ABSENT.
THAT NOW CONCLUDES THE BUSINESS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ONLY. IS THERE A MOTION TO ADJOURN
THE REDEVELOPMF-NT AGENCY?
MR. BUQUET:
MS. BRCWN:
MR. STOUT:
SO MOVED.
SECONDED.
MOVED BY BUQUET AND SECONDED BY
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REP~oTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meet~n[
June 17, 1987
Page 34 27
BROWN TO ADJOURN TaE RgDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
MR. STOUT: OPPOSED?
( NO RESPONSE. )
MR. ST(X]T: UNANIMOUS WITH KING ABSENT.
ALL RIGLIT. THE COUNCIL IS STILL IN ACTION-
EXCUSE ME -- SESSION- UNTIL THE -- THE NEXT ITEM OF
BUSINESS IS A RES(LUTION WITH RESPECT TO CITY COUNCIL
WELCH ALSO HAS TO CERTIFY THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT. IS THERE A MOTION WITH RESPECT TO THAT
RESCLUTION?
MS. WRIGHT:
DISCUSSION.
MR. STC~T:
MR. BUQUET.-
MR. STOUT:
BUQUET.
I MOVE ADOPTION, AND I HAVE SOME
DO YOU WANT A SECOND FIRST?
SECONDED.
MOVED BY WRIGBT AND SECONDED BY
MS. WRIGIiT= I WOULD JUST LIKE TO STATE THAT
IT APPEARS THAT WE ARE JUST MERELY RUBBER STAMPING
SC~4ETHING, WHEN IN FACT IF YOU HEARD THE DATES THAT THIS
BODY HEARD AND DEALT WITH THIS ISSUE BEFORE, YOU WOULD
KNOW THAT THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THAT WE HAVE HAD
THIS INFORMATION. WE HAVE ALSO HAD INTENSIVE
NEGOTIATIONS, SESSIONS IN CLOSED DOORS, WEICH IS
REQUIRED BY THE BRCXqN ACT, AND SO WE HAVE DEALT WITH THE
SITUATION THERE. SO THE FACT THAT WE AREN'T DISCUSSING
IT NOW DOES NOT MEAN THAT WE HAVE NOT THORCIJGHLY GONE
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 28
Page 35
OVER THIS INFORMATION AND BECAME VERY FAMILIAR WITIt IT
IN ORDER TO MAKE (IJR DECISION. I JUST WANTED TO MAKE
THAT CLEAR IN CASE IT LOOKED LIKE SCNETHING ELSE WAS
GOING ON.
MR. ST(lIT= IN CASE YOU ARE WONDERING, ALSO
THESE BOOKS WHICH WE HAVE BEFORE US WHICH ARE IN SEVERAL
VOLUMES CONTAIN WRITTEN MATERIAL WHICH SUMMARIZES THE
VAST NUMBER OF BEARINGS, AND SO FORTH, WE HAVE HAD ON
THIS PARTICULAR PLAN. SO TONIGHT IS NOT THE FIRST TIME
THAT THIS TOPIC HAS COME BEFORE THE COUNCIL OR THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY A~ IS INDICATED. I'D ALSO LIKE TO
INVITE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO FEELS THEY HAVE
QUESTIONS, BUT FOR REASON OF BEING SHY OR WHATEVER,
WOULD NOT CARE TO ASK THEM HERE AT THE PODIUM, THAT OUR
CITY STAFF AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF ARE ALL
AVAILABLE TO TAKE QUESTIONS FRC!! YOU AND ARE ~I3RE THAN
WILLING TO EXPLAIN ANY OF THE TECHNICALITIES THAT ARE
BEING PRESENTED HERE FOR AS MUCH TIME AS IT TAKES FOR
YOU TO UNDERSTAND. SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE THAT CLEAR AS
WELL.
IS THERE A MOTION AND A SECOND WITH RESPECT TO THE
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION?
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL = AYE.
MR. STOUT= OPPOSED?
( NO RESPONSE. )
MR. STOUTs UNANIMOUS WITH KING ABSENT.
IS THERE A SEPARATE RESCLUTION ON THE AMENDMENT,
KHAUSE SHORTItAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COUNSEL ?
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
J~ne 17, 1987
Page 36 29
MR. BROWN ~ THERE IS. NOW FOR YOUR
CONSIDERATION THE ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 1.
MR. STClJT:
THAT ORDINANCE THEN.
MS. BRCklN:
ALL RIGHT. I ~10VE THE ADOPTION OP
IS THERE A SECOND?
SECOND.
MR. MARKMAN: MR. MAYOR, WE'RE BACKING UP TO
THIS FIRST READING. IT WILL BE PROCESSED AS ANY OTHER
ORDINANCE OP THE COUNCIL, SO IF THE CLERK WOULD READ THE
TITLE AND WOULD YOU CONSIDER IT?
MR. ST(lIT: ALL RIGHT. LET'S DO THAT.
MS. AUTHALET: ORDINANCE NO. 316 AND ORDINANCE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAKNGA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
AMENII4ENT NO. 1 FOR THE RANCHO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT.
MR. STOUT: ALL RIGHT. WHAT IS THE ACTION?
MR. MARKMAN: WE'LL NEED A MOTION TO ACCEPT
THAT ORDINANCE FOR THAT FIRST MEETING, WAIVE FULL
READING AND HAVE THE SECOND READING SAVED FOR THE NEXT
COUNCIL MEETING.
MR. ST(lIT:
MS. BR(TNN:
MR. STOUT:
BR(TNN.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR?
ALL: AYE.
MR. STOUT: OPPOSED7
SO ~0VED. IS THERE A SECOND?
SECONDED.
MOVED BY STCtlT AND SECONDED BY
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP
1
2
3
4
5
6
?
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987 30
Page 37
( NO RESPONSE. )
MR. MARI~IAN: FOR THE RECORD, THAT WAS A
UNANIMOUS VOTE AS WELL.
MR. STaJTz YES.
ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME I AM GOING TO RECESS THE
CITY COUNCIL BRIEFLY TO ALLOW THOSE OF YOU WHO WOULD
LIKE TO LEAVE TO ALLOW YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO.
THE COUNCIL WILL BE BACK IN SESSION IN TEN MINUTES. I
WOULD ALSO INDICATE THAT (~3R STAFF IS PRESENT IF THERE
ARE ANY OF YOU WHO WO~LD LIKE TO ASK QUESTIONS NOW.
KRAUSE SHORT'aAND REPORTING CORP
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
!5
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint RDA/City Council Meeting
June 17, 1987
Page 38 3!
NOTARIAL CERTIPICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) SS.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
I, SHIRLEY M. KRAUSE, A NOTARY PUBLIC WITHIN AND
FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DO
HE REBY CE RT IFY:
THAT THE SAID HEARING WAS TAKEN DOWN BY M.E
IN STENOTYPE AT THE TIME AND PLACE THEREIN STATED AND WAS
THEREAFTER REDUCED TO TYPEWRITING UNDER MY DIRECTION.
I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT I AM NOT OF COUNSEL OR
ATTORNEY FOR EITHER OF THE PARTIES HERETO OR IN ANY WAY
INTERESTED IN THE EVENT OF THIS CAUSE, AND THAT I AM NOT
RELATED TO EITHER OF THE PARTIES THERETO.
WITNESS MY HAND AND SEAL THIS 30TH DAY OF
JUNE, 1986.
SHIRLEY M. KRAUSE
KRAUSE SHORTHAND REPORTING CORP