HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/12/03 - Minutes December 3, 1980
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center,
9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, December 3, 1980. The meeting
was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led in the flag
salute.
Present: Councilmen Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur H. Bridge, and Mayor
Phillip D. Schlosser.
Also present: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Attorney, Robert
Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack
Lam; City Planner, Barry Hogan; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry
Empey; Community Services Director, Bill Holley.
Absent: Councilman James C. Frost
Approval of Minutes: It was requested that a sentence be reworded on page 7, Section
4A, sixth paragraph, line three as follows: "However, he felt that we would be remiss
if we did not require a "B" type roof throughout the City due to fire problems created
because of the winds." Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve the
amended minutes of November 5, 1980. Motion carried 4-1-0. (Councilman Frost absemt).
2. CONSENT CALENDAR.
Councilman Mikels requested that item "1" be removed since there was no backup material
submitted in the agenda. Item was the release of Performance Bond for slope planting
for tract 9350.
a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80-12-3 for $200,838.24.
b. Alcoholic Beverage License for Dorothy E. Heinemann, The Cub, 8411 Foothill
Boulevard -- on-sale beer and wine.
c. Alcoholic Beverage License for Sun Pacific Airlines, Inc. for Bud Grossberg,
Samuel P. Crowe, Weldon Gadberry, Robert Jensen, Joseph Tavaglione. Ronald Wayne
Burkle, Sun Pacific Airlines, 9223 Archibald Avenue -- on-sale general.
d. Forward Claim from Rodney J. Heathcock to the City Attorney for handling.
e. Forward Claim from Keith Allen Baker to the City Attorney for handling.
f. Authorization for the Deputy City Clerk to attend the 1981 City Clerks
Institute, January 14-16 in Sacramento, Estimated cost: $200.00.
g. Reimbursement Agreement for Engineering on Industrial Assessment District: (51
Approval of agreement to allow reimbursement of $25,000 in Assessment Engineering and
Legal Counsel for Assessment District 79-1. These funds would only be reimbursed if
the district is approved and formed.
h. Contract Addendum to Carnelian Street Realignment Project: Approval of extra work (6)
to cover the cost of structural design of the expansion of a box culvert required to
complete the Carnelain Street realignment.
i. Vineyard Avenue Design Services: Approval of contract with C G Engineering to (7)
complete right-of-way acquisition, railroad coordination, and design of the Vineyard
Avenue FAU project. Rescind approval by contract with the City of Ontario for similar
services.
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page 2
(8) J. Acceptance of Parcel Map No. 5505: Recommend that Council accept the subject
map which consists of four parcels located on the north side of Almond Street,
east of Sapphire.
RESOLUTION NO. 80-108
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NO. 5505 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
5505).
(9) k. Approval of Parcel Map No. 5922: Recommend that Council authorize the City
(10) Clerk and City Engineer to sign the subject map. The map consists of four parcels
located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Jasper Street.
RESOLUTION NO.' 80-109
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5922 (TENTATIVE PARCEL NO.
5922), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT
SECURITY.
(Item was removed for lack of backup information).
(12) m. Approval of Contract for Services to Establish Computer Terminal Facilities
for the Fiscal Model.
(13) n. Set December 17, 1980 for public hearing on Environmental Assessment and
Planned Development No. 80-02 -- Lesney. A change of zone request from R-l-5
(single family residential) to P.D. (planned development) for 10 acres located
on the northwest corner of Hermosa and Base Line Road, and the development of a
117 lot townhouse development consisting of 114 dwelling units. APN 202-182-13.
(14) o. Set December 17, 1980 for public hearing on Environmental Assessment and
Zone Change No. 80-15 -- Landmark. A change of zone from A-1 (limited agricul-
tural) to R-2 (two family residential) for 12 acres located west of Beryl,
south of Mignonette. APN 202-032-71.
(15) p. Set December 17, 1980 for public hearing on the Subdivision Ordinance.
(16) q. Authorization for part-time clerk typist for the ~o~unity Services Department
through June 30, 1981.
(17) r. Approval of Railroad Spur Crossing: It is recommended that Council approve
a resolution authorizing the mayor to sign petitions submitted by the Railway
Company.
RESOLUTION NO. 80-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A
PETITION BY THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE
RAILWAY COMPANY TO CONSTRUCT A SPUR LINE ACROSS
EIGHTH STREET 2,912.5 FEET WEST OF ROCHESTER
AVENUE.
(18) s. Amendment to city facility leases: It is recomanended that Council renew
the lease for units A, B, C-1 and C-2 for a two-year period.
Councilman Frost arrived at 7:08 p.m.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the Consent Calendar
with the exception of item "1" which had been removed. Motion carried unanimously
5-0.
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page 3
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
3A. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING BUILDING REGULATIONS. Jerry Grant, Building Official, (19)
presented the staff report.
The Council's main concern with the ordinance was in Chapter 16, section 1603
dealing with roof coverings in high fire hazard areas. Mr. Grant explained the
differences between the A, B, and C class roofings. However, Councilman Bridge
said he was not satisfied with the definitions and wished to have the item continued
so he could read them for himself.
M~yor asked the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 122. City Clerk
Wasserman read the title. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive
further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 122 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 1979
EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, UNIFORM
HOUSING CODE, UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF
DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, UNIFORM SIGN CODE, UNIFORM
BUILDING SECURITY CODE, AND UNIFORM BUILDING CODE
STANDARDS AND MAKING CERTAIN CHANGES THEREIN
NECESSARY TO MEET LOCAL CONDITIONS.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were:
Morris Goldberg, 2145 Las Luna, Pasadena. He explained the differences
between the Class A and Class B type roofing materials. He said it was not necessary
to eliminate shake type roofing in high fire hazard areas since you could put a
Class C shake material on top of a Class B type base.
Ken Willis, BIA, said the BIA supports the use of fire retardant type roofing materials
in high fire hazard areas. He suggested that in areas where such materials are
required that Council also require retrofitting.
John Lyons, Foothill Fire District Board Member, said that a tile roof is very heavy
on top of a burning structure.
Doreen Warren questioned Section 3210. She said her home needed a new roof and
they planned to do the work themselves. She questioned the necessity of having
this inspected and obtaining permits since this would add to the cost. Mr. Grant
explained that this had been required under the previous codes. This had not been
changed.
Herman Rempel, Planning Commissioner, felt that these requirements were not necessary
and would simply add to the cost of the house.
Ken Willis said he differed with Mr. Rempel since there was a difference of about
$2000 per dwelling unit between the use of shake versus tile.
Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing since there were no further comments.
Councilman Bridge said that perhaps we needed to come up with something unique for
Rancho Cucamonga.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to continue this item to the January
7, 1981 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 8:15 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:40 p.m.
with all members of the Council and staff present.
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page 4
(20) 3B. INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 80-02. Amendments to the San
Bernardino County Land Use and Building regulations as adopted by Ordinance
No. 17. Staff report presented by Barry Hogan.
Mr. Hogan requested that the Planned Development section be referred back to the
Planning Commission for reconsideration to the R-l-1 and R-20,000 zoning districts.
Also, to add the new page 7 which had been submitted to Council prior to the
meeting.
Mayor requested the City Clerk to read the title of the Ordinance. City Clerk
Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 123.
ORDINANCE NO. 123 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE
RESIDENTIAL, PARKING, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND
ADMINISTRATION SECTIONS OF THE INTERIM ZONING
ORDINANCE.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion
carried unanimously 5-0.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no'response,
the public hearing was closed.
Councilman Mikels said he had several recommendations for changes to the ordinance
which were:
Page 5(b) Accessory Uses Permited:
(1) Guest House (bathroom plumbing only).
(2) Private garage with space for maximum of 4 cars.
(3) Hom~ Occupation pursuant to Ordinance 72 of the City of Rancho
Cucamanga.
(4) A temporary sales office may be located in a subdivision, etc.
to remain the same.
Page 7(b) Accessory Uses Permitted:
(1) These uses permitted pursuant to Section 61.024A(b).
(c) Parking requirements: remains the same.
(d) Loading Space Requirements: remains the same.
(e) Height Limitations: remains the same.
(f) Minimum Areas and Dimensions of Lots: remains the same.
(g) Front Yard Required: remains the same.
(h) Interior Side Yard Required: remains the same.
(i) Rear Yard Required: remains the same.
.(J) Distances Required between Main Buildings: remains the same.
(k) Side Street Yard Required: remains the same.
(1) Open Space Required: remains the same.
Page 13 (A) The applicant shall obtain City Council approval for establishment of
a Homeowners' Association prior to the selling of any lot or occupancy
of any dwelling unit.
Page 14 (6) (line 4 of the section) The City Council shall approve, modify, or
disapprove the zone change and Development Plan.
Page 22 (IV) Off-Site Parking Facilities: The City Planner may authorize not
more than 10 percent of the required parking for a use to be located
(rest remains the same)
Page 25 (A) 12th line -- To achieve these purposes, the Planning Commission is
empowered to review and evaluate the anplicable circumstances pertain-
ing to each use subject to Development Review (rest remains the same).
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page 5
Page 26 (VI) The City Planner may require additional information or plans,
necessary to enable complete analysis and evaluation of the
application by the Planning Commission. The application shall
be accompanied by a fee established by Resolution of the City
Council.
(3) Action by City Planner:
(A) The City Planner shall review the application for
Development Review and shall refer said application to
the Planning Commission, along with recommendations and
suggested conditions, if any, within 30 days of acceptance
of the application for Development Review. Conditions
may include, but shall not be limited to, requirements
for special yards, open spaces, buffers, fences, walls,
and screening; requirements for installation and mainten-
ance of landscaping and erosion control measures; require-
ments for street improvements and dedications, regulation
of vehicular ingress, egress, and traffic circulation;
regulation of signs; regulation of hours or other charac-
teristics of operation; requirements for maintenance of
landscaping and other improvements; establishment of
development schedules or time limits for performance or
completion; and such other conditions as the City Planner
may deem necessary to insure compatibility with surrounding
uses, to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare,
and to enable the Planning Commission to make the findings
required by Section 61.0219(n)5.
(B) Delete paragraph.
Page 27(5~A) The Planning Commission shall make the following findings
before granting approval pursuant to Development Review:
(6A) The decision of the Planning Commission shall be effective
14 calendar days after the date of the decision unless an
appeal has been filed with the City Council
(7A) A decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed within
14 calendar days to the City Council by the applicant or any
other person as prescribed in Section 61.0222.
(SB) A Development Review approval subject to lapse may be renewed
by the Planning Commission for an additional period of one
year, provided that prior to the expiration date, a written
request for renewal is filed with the Planning Commission. If
the application is appealed to the City Council, it may be ex-
tended by the City Council.
Page 29 (3B) The City Planner shall make an investigation of the application
and shall prepare a report thereon which shall be available to
the City Council and Planning Commission and to the applicant
prior to the public hearing.
Page 30 (8C) The Planning Commission may grant or deny an application for
renewal. If the application is appealed to the City Council,
the City Council may grant or deny an application for renewal.
Page 31 (llB) Line 6 -- Within two (2) working days following the date of a
decision of the Commission revoking a Use Permit or location
and development plan, the City Planner shall transmit to the
City Council written notice of the decision.
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page 6
Page 32 (14B) Application for a Conditional Use Permit may be made concurrently
with an application for a change in zone boundaries including the
same property, subject to the fee applicable for both a Conditional
Use Permit and for a rezoning application. The Planning Co~m~ission
shall hold the public hearing on the zoning reclassification and
the Conditional Use Permit at the same meeting and may combine the two
hearings. For the purposes of this section, the date of the
Commission decision on the Conditional Use Permit application shall
be deemed to be the same as the date of enactment by the City Council
of an ordinance changing the zone boundaries. (Delete the remainder
of the section).
Page 34 (3B) The City Planner shall make an investigation of the application and
shall prepare a report thereon which shall be available to the
City Council and Planning Commission and to the applicant prior to
the public hearing.
Page 36 (8D) Add...If appealed to the City Council, the City Council may grant or deny an application for renewal.
(9C) Within two (2) working days following the date of a decision of
the Commission revoking a variance, the City Planner shall transmit
to the City Council written notice of the decision. (rest of section
remains the same).
Page 37 (3A. IV) Delete the entire section.
Page 38 (3B) The City Planner shall make an investigation of the application and
shall prepare a report thereon which shall be available to the City
Council and Planning Commission and to the applicant prior to the
public hearing.
(5B) In order to more properly accommodate these alternate zone
classifications, the notice of public hearing shall indicate the
alternate classifications, if any, which the Planning Commission
may consider.
Page 39 (7A) Line 14 -- The Council may modify a recommendation of the Planning
Commission on a rezonin$ or change and may request and consider a
report of the Commission on the modification. Failure of the
Commission to report within 30 days after receipt of the Council
request shall be deemed concurrence.
Councilman Palombo recommended the following changes on page 10 of the Ordinance:
On page 10, Section (b)(2) -- reduce the ~pecified densities by 50%.
Then add Section (5) -- "Bonus adjustments should be determined and
approved by the Planning Commission and City Council."
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page 7
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to give first reading to Ordinance
No. 123 with the suggested language changes as suggested by Councilman Palombo
and himself and to set second reading for January 7, 1981. Motion carried unanimously
5-0.
3C. ZONE CHANGE REQUEST NO. 80-18 - R.J. INVESTMENTS. Staff report presented b~/ ?
Barry Hogan.
Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson, read the title of Ordinance No. 125. Motion:
Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 125 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBER 207-191-49-48 FROM R-1 TO R-3
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WEST
OFBAKERAVENUE.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no resoonse,
the hearing was closed.
Councilman Frost expressed that he could not see any way the one section zoned R-3
could be compatible with the R-1-T and felt the zone change was not appropriate.
Council also expressed concern over the traffic flow off Baker onto Foothill
Boulevard.
Motion: Moved by Frost to deny the zone change request. For lack of a second the
motion failed.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the zone change request.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES:
Frost. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINED: Mikels. Councilman Mikels expressed that he
abstained since his home was in the vicinity.
3D. ZONE CHANGE REQUEST NO. 80-19 - DIVERSIFIED. A zone change request for 16 acres
of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line and Archibald from R-l-5
(single family residential) to A-P (administrative-professional) and R-3 (multiple
family residential). APN 201-181-12, 21, and 22. Staff report presented by Barry
Hogan.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 126. Motion: Moved by Mikels,
seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5--0.
ORDINANCE NO. 126 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NUMBERS 201-181-12, 21, AND 22.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was:
Mr. A. Douglas Wilson, 7074 Ramona Avenue, read a letter which he had sent
to Mr. Wasserman expressing his opposition to the zone change. He recommended
that a medical facility be located on this particular piece of property.
There being no further public comment, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing.
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page 8
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to approve the zone change and
Ordinance No. 126. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
3E. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80-20 - Vanguard. A zone change request from R-R to R-1
on 10 acres of land located north of Arrow Highway, east of Archibald Avenue
at the eastern terminus of Cerise and Placer Streets. APN 208-311-01.
Staff report presented by Barry Hogan.
Deputy City Clerk Beverly Authelet read title of Ordinance No.-127. Motion:
Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried
unanimously 5-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 127 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208-311-01 FROM R-R
TO R-1 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW
HIGHWAY AND EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response,
the hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the zone change and
Ordinance No. 127. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
3F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 80-03 - Adult
Businesses. An ordinance establishing regulations of the location and review of
adult businesses in the C-2 general business district. Staff report presented by
Mr. Wasserman.
City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 45-C. Motion: Moved by Palombo,
seconded by Bridge to waive furthe~ reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
ORDINANCE NO. 45-C (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING
REGULATIONS FOR THE LOCATION AND REVIEW OF ADULT
BUSINESSES IN THE C-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS) DISTRICT.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the
hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to approve Ordinance No. 45-C. The
motion carried unanimously 5-0.
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACTS NOS.
3G.
ANNEXATION
NO.
2
TO
LANDSCAPE
9176~ 9225~ 9436~ AA~ 9567. Staff report presented by Lloy~ Hubbs.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public comments. There being none, the
public portion was closed.
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page 9
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 80-111
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Clerk
Wasserman read title of Resolution No. 80-111.
RESOLUTION NO. 80-111
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE
WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 1
FOR TRACT NOS. 9176, 9225, 9435, AND 9567.
3H. APPEAL OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ISSUED FOR GLEN FRANKLIN. Staff report pre-
sented by Lloyd Hubbs.
The City had received an appeal for an approved Tree Removal Permit to remove
eleven eucalyptus and palm trees located at 6730 Hellman Avenue. Mr. Hubbs said
that two letters expressing opposition to the removal of the trees had been re-
ceived by the City.
Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing.
Dan Drake, speaking for his father-in-law who lived at 6754 Hellman Avenue, spoke
in favor of having the tree removal request denied.
Bob Lesondak, 6840 Hellman Avenue. spoke in favor of retaining the trees and the
high curbs since the street was a water carrying street during the rainy season.
There being no further co~m~ents from the audience, Mayor Schlosser closed the
public portion of the meeting.
Councilman Bridge expressed that it would be a crime to change Hellman Avenue
now. He said that this particular variety of eucalyptus tree is clean and the
way that they are planted is an asset to the city.
Motion: Moved by Bridge seconded by Palombo to retain the curbs and trees on
Hellman Avenue and to sustain the appeal. This is to be a precedent
for the rest of Hellman Avenue. Also, to have a lien attached to this ·
particular piece of property in order to protect the future interest of the
property and the city. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 10:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11:00 p.m.
with all members of the Council and staff present.
4. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
4A. APPEAL OF DECISION REGARDING THE RED HILL COFFEE SHOP SIGN.
Mayor Schlosser asked Mrs. Moffatt to come forward. He asked her if she has any
alternatives to suggest to the staff recommendation. She stated there was three
years left on the amoritation plan. They would be willing to m~lit the time with
the city which would grant them eighteen months. After some discussion by the
Council, the following motion was made:
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to allow the Moffatts eighteen
months (June 1982) to amortize the Red Hill Coffee Shop sign. Motion passed by
the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Frost.
ABSENT: None. Frost said he opposed this because he felt we should comply with
our own Ordinance and make this six months.
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page 10
4B. ONTARIO GROUND ACCESS STUDY. Staff report presented by Lloyd Hubbs.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the allocation of
$5,000 as our city's share toward the increased cost of the contract for the
Ontario Ground Access Study. The amount to be allocated from the public circu-
lation study fund. Motion carried unanimously 5-0.
4C. ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED
- !
COMMUNITY. Staff report presented by Jim Robinson.
Mr. Vlasic, Advisory Commission Chariman for the month of December, read a letter
which had been sent to the Council requesting that the public hearings on the
Victoria Planned Community be suspended until after the City's General Plan was
adopted. The letter had received unanimously support by all Advisory Commissioners.
Jim Banks, Etiwanda resident, suggested that the City Council become more involved
in the General Plan process. He said the Co~nission has been hearing input from
the citizens, but decisions are never made.
Don Baer, Advisory Commissioner
John Lyons, Foothill Fire District Board Member
Gary Frye, William Lyon Company representative
Ron Tannabaum, Etiwanda resident
Marsha Banks, Etiwanda resident
After hearing the comments from the audience, the Mayor closed the public portion
of the meeting.
Councilman Bridge said he favored going ahead with the planned community and the
general plan at the same time since they really could not be separated.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to concur with the Planning Co~issi~
recommendation to postpone the hearings on the Lyon Planned Community until
January 1981. At that time to have only monthly meetings until the General Plan
is adopted, then to return to the normal review schedule. Motion carried unanimo~
5-0.
Councilman Mikels said he wanted to see the General Plan coma to the Council in
February. Council concurred.
4D. APPROVAL TO NEGOTIATE FOR ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES. Staff report by
Lloyd Hubbs.
Councilman Frost excused himself from the Council ~able since he had an employer
involved in this discussion.
Motion: Moved by Mikeis, seconded by Palombo to authorize staff to negotiate time
and material's contracts for design services for:
1. EDA Grant application preparation and coordination with L.D. King at
an estimated budget of $5,000.
2. Victoria and Terra Vista Drainage Analysis review with L.D. King at an
estimated budget of $5,000.
City Council Minutes
December 3, 1980
Page i1
3. Detailed Circulation Planning and Design review for General Plan
Victoria, Terra Vista, Industrial Specific Plan with DKS Associates
at an estimated budget of $10,000.
4. Minor roadway design services for Grove Avenue, Vineyard Avenue, the
Demens Creek Bridge, and others with Associated Engineers at an
estimated budget of $15,000.
Motion carried by the following vote: AYES; Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser.
NOES: None. ABSENT: Frost.
5. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none.
6. COUNCIL MATTERS. There were none.
7. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn to an
Executive Session, not to reconvene this eyening, but to reconvene on December
11, at 7:00 p.m. for a Special Assessment District meeting at Lion's Park Conmmunity
Center. The meeting adjourned at 12:35 a.m.
Re~pect full~,submit ted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk