Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1980/12/03 - Minutes December 3, 1980 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting 1. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center, 9161 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, December 3, 1980. The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m. by Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser who led in the flag salute. Present: Councilmen Jon D. Mikels, Michael A. Palombo, Arthur H. Bridge, and Mayor Phillip D. Schlosser. Also present: City Manager, Lauren M. Wasserman; Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Planner, Barry Hogan; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; Finance Director, Harry Empey; Community Services Director, Bill Holley. Absent: Councilman James C. Frost Approval of Minutes: It was requested that a sentence be reworded on page 7, Section 4A, sixth paragraph, line three as follows: "However, he felt that we would be remiss if we did not require a "B" type roof throughout the City due to fire problems created because of the winds." Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to approve the amended minutes of November 5, 1980. Motion carried 4-1-0. (Councilman Frost absemt). 2. CONSENT CALENDAR. Councilman Mikels requested that item "1" be removed since there was no backup material submitted in the agenda. Item was the release of Performance Bond for slope planting for tract 9350. a. Approval of Warrants - Register No. 80-12-3 for $200,838.24. b. Alcoholic Beverage License for Dorothy E. Heinemann, The Cub, 8411 Foothill Boulevard -- on-sale beer and wine. c. Alcoholic Beverage License for Sun Pacific Airlines, Inc. for Bud Grossberg, Samuel P. Crowe, Weldon Gadberry, Robert Jensen, Joseph Tavaglione. Ronald Wayne Burkle, Sun Pacific Airlines, 9223 Archibald Avenue -- on-sale general. d. Forward Claim from Rodney J. Heathcock to the City Attorney for handling. e. Forward Claim from Keith Allen Baker to the City Attorney for handling. f. Authorization for the Deputy City Clerk to attend the 1981 City Clerks Institute, January 14-16 in Sacramento, Estimated cost: $200.00. g. Reimbursement Agreement for Engineering on Industrial Assessment District: (51 Approval of agreement to allow reimbursement of $25,000 in Assessment Engineering and Legal Counsel for Assessment District 79-1. These funds would only be reimbursed if the district is approved and formed. h. Contract Addendum to Carnelian Street Realignment Project: Approval of extra work (6) to cover the cost of structural design of the expansion of a box culvert required to complete the Carnelain Street realignment. i. Vineyard Avenue Design Services: Approval of contract with C G Engineering to (7) complete right-of-way acquisition, railroad coordination, and design of the Vineyard Avenue FAU project. Rescind approval by contract with the City of Ontario for similar services. City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page 2 (8) J. Acceptance of Parcel Map No. 5505: Recommend that Council accept the subject map which consists of four parcels located on the north side of Almond Street, east of Sapphire. RESOLUTION NO. 80-108 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NO. 5505 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5505). (9) k. Approval of Parcel Map No. 5922: Recommend that Council authorize the City (10) Clerk and City Engineer to sign the subject map. The map consists of four parcels located at the southeast corner of 19th Street and Jasper Street. RESOLUTION NO.' 80-109 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP NUMBER 5922 (TENTATIVE PARCEL NO. 5922), IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY. (Item was removed for lack of backup information). (12) m. Approval of Contract for Services to Establish Computer Terminal Facilities for the Fiscal Model. (13) n. Set December 17, 1980 for public hearing on Environmental Assessment and Planned Development No. 80-02 -- Lesney. A change of zone request from R-l-5 (single family residential) to P.D. (planned development) for 10 acres located on the northwest corner of Hermosa and Base Line Road, and the development of a 117 lot townhouse development consisting of 114 dwelling units. APN 202-182-13. (14) o. Set December 17, 1980 for public hearing on Environmental Assessment and Zone Change No. 80-15 -- Landmark. A change of zone from A-1 (limited agricul- tural) to R-2 (two family residential) for 12 acres located west of Beryl, south of Mignonette. APN 202-032-71. (15) p. Set December 17, 1980 for public hearing on the Subdivision Ordinance. (16) q. Authorization for part-time clerk typist for the ~o~unity Services Department through June 30, 1981. (17) r. Approval of Railroad Spur Crossing: It is recommended that Council approve a resolution authorizing the mayor to sign petitions submitted by the Railway Company. RESOLUTION NO. 80-110 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PETITION BY THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY TO CONSTRUCT A SPUR LINE ACROSS EIGHTH STREET 2,912.5 FEET WEST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE. (18) s. Amendment to city facility leases: It is recomanended that Council renew the lease for units A, B, C-1 and C-2 for a two-year period. Councilman Frost arrived at 7:08 p.m. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of item "1" which had been removed. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page 3 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS. 3A. AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING BUILDING REGULATIONS. Jerry Grant, Building Official, (19) presented the staff report. The Council's main concern with the ordinance was in Chapter 16, section 1603 dealing with roof coverings in high fire hazard areas. Mr. Grant explained the differences between the A, B, and C class roofings. However, Councilman Bridge said he was not satisfied with the definitions and wished to have the item continued so he could read them for himself. M~yor asked the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 122. City Clerk Wasserman read the title. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ORDINANCE NO. 122 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE 1979 EDITIONS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, UNIFORM HOUSING CODE, UNIFORM CODE FOR ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS, UNIFORM SIGN CODE, UNIFORM BUILDING SECURITY CODE, AND UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS AND MAKING CERTAIN CHANGES THEREIN NECESSARY TO MEET LOCAL CONDITIONS. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council were: Morris Goldberg, 2145 Las Luna, Pasadena. He explained the differences between the Class A and Class B type roofing materials. He said it was not necessary to eliminate shake type roofing in high fire hazard areas since you could put a Class C shake material on top of a Class B type base. Ken Willis, BIA, said the BIA supports the use of fire retardant type roofing materials in high fire hazard areas. He suggested that in areas where such materials are required that Council also require retrofitting. John Lyons, Foothill Fire District Board Member, said that a tile roof is very heavy on top of a burning structure. Doreen Warren questioned Section 3210. She said her home needed a new roof and they planned to do the work themselves. She questioned the necessity of having this inspected and obtaining permits since this would add to the cost. Mr. Grant explained that this had been required under the previous codes. This had not been changed. Herman Rempel, Planning Commissioner, felt that these requirements were not necessary and would simply add to the cost of the house. Ken Willis said he differed with Mr. Rempel since there was a difference of about $2000 per dwelling unit between the use of shake versus tile. Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing since there were no further comments. Councilman Bridge said that perhaps we needed to come up with something unique for Rancho Cucamonga. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to continue this item to the January 7, 1981 meeting. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 8:15 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:40 p.m. with all members of the Council and staff present. City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page 4 (20) 3B. INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 80-02. Amendments to the San Bernardino County Land Use and Building regulations as adopted by Ordinance No. 17. Staff report presented by Barry Hogan. Mr. Hogan requested that the Planned Development section be referred back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration to the R-l-1 and R-20,000 zoning districts. Also, to add the new page 7 which had been submitted to Council prior to the meeting. Mayor requested the City Clerk to read the title of the Ordinance. City Clerk Wasserman read the title of Ordinance No. 123. ORDINANCE NO. 123 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RESIDENTIAL, PARKING, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND ADMINISTRATION SECTIONS OF THE INTERIM ZONING ORDINANCE. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no'response, the public hearing was closed. Councilman Mikels said he had several recommendations for changes to the ordinance which were: Page 5(b) Accessory Uses Permited: (1) Guest House (bathroom plumbing only). (2) Private garage with space for maximum of 4 cars. (3) Hom~ Occupation pursuant to Ordinance 72 of the City of Rancho Cucamanga. (4) A temporary sales office may be located in a subdivision, etc. to remain the same. Page 7(b) Accessory Uses Permitted: (1) These uses permitted pursuant to Section 61.024A(b). (c) Parking requirements: remains the same. (d) Loading Space Requirements: remains the same. (e) Height Limitations: remains the same. (f) Minimum Areas and Dimensions of Lots: remains the same. (g) Front Yard Required: remains the same. (h) Interior Side Yard Required: remains the same. (i) Rear Yard Required: remains the same. .(J) Distances Required between Main Buildings: remains the same. (k) Side Street Yard Required: remains the same. (1) Open Space Required: remains the same. Page 13 (A) The applicant shall obtain City Council approval for establishment of a Homeowners' Association prior to the selling of any lot or occupancy of any dwelling unit. Page 14 (6) (line 4 of the section) The City Council shall approve, modify, or disapprove the zone change and Development Plan. Page 22 (IV) Off-Site Parking Facilities: The City Planner may authorize not more than 10 percent of the required parking for a use to be located (rest remains the same) Page 25 (A) 12th line -- To achieve these purposes, the Planning Commission is empowered to review and evaluate the anplicable circumstances pertain- ing to each use subject to Development Review (rest remains the same). City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page 5 Page 26 (VI) The City Planner may require additional information or plans, necessary to enable complete analysis and evaluation of the application by the Planning Commission. The application shall be accompanied by a fee established by Resolution of the City Council. (3) Action by City Planner: (A) The City Planner shall review the application for Development Review and shall refer said application to the Planning Commission, along with recommendations and suggested conditions, if any, within 30 days of acceptance of the application for Development Review. Conditions may include, but shall not be limited to, requirements for special yards, open spaces, buffers, fences, walls, and screening; requirements for installation and mainten- ance of landscaping and erosion control measures; require- ments for street improvements and dedications, regulation of vehicular ingress, egress, and traffic circulation; regulation of signs; regulation of hours or other charac- teristics of operation; requirements for maintenance of landscaping and other improvements; establishment of development schedules or time limits for performance or completion; and such other conditions as the City Planner may deem necessary to insure compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, and to enable the Planning Commission to make the findings required by Section 61.0219(n)5. (B) Delete paragraph. Page 27(5~A) The Planning Commission shall make the following findings before granting approval pursuant to Development Review: (6A) The decision of the Planning Commission shall be effective 14 calendar days after the date of the decision unless an appeal has been filed with the City Council (7A) A decision of the Planning Commission may be appealed within 14 calendar days to the City Council by the applicant or any other person as prescribed in Section 61.0222. (SB) A Development Review approval subject to lapse may be renewed by the Planning Commission for an additional period of one year, provided that prior to the expiration date, a written request for renewal is filed with the Planning Commission. If the application is appealed to the City Council, it may be ex- tended by the City Council. Page 29 (3B) The City Planner shall make an investigation of the application and shall prepare a report thereon which shall be available to the City Council and Planning Commission and to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Page 30 (8C) The Planning Commission may grant or deny an application for renewal. If the application is appealed to the City Council, the City Council may grant or deny an application for renewal. Page 31 (llB) Line 6 -- Within two (2) working days following the date of a decision of the Commission revoking a Use Permit or location and development plan, the City Planner shall transmit to the City Council written notice of the decision. City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page 6 Page 32 (14B) Application for a Conditional Use Permit may be made concurrently with an application for a change in zone boundaries including the same property, subject to the fee applicable for both a Conditional Use Permit and for a rezoning application. The Planning Co~m~ission shall hold the public hearing on the zoning reclassification and the Conditional Use Permit at the same meeting and may combine the two hearings. For the purposes of this section, the date of the Commission decision on the Conditional Use Permit application shall be deemed to be the same as the date of enactment by the City Council of an ordinance changing the zone boundaries. (Delete the remainder of the section). Page 34 (3B) The City Planner shall make an investigation of the application and shall prepare a report thereon which shall be available to the City Council and Planning Commission and to the applicant prior to the public hearing. Page 36 (8D) Add...If appealed to the City Council, the City Council may grant or deny an application for renewal. (9C) Within two (2) working days following the date of a decision of the Commission revoking a variance, the City Planner shall transmit to the City Council written notice of the decision. (rest of section remains the same). Page 37 (3A. IV) Delete the entire section. Page 38 (3B) The City Planner shall make an investigation of the application and shall prepare a report thereon which shall be available to the City Council and Planning Commission and to the applicant prior to the public hearing. (5B) In order to more properly accommodate these alternate zone classifications, the notice of public hearing shall indicate the alternate classifications, if any, which the Planning Commission may consider. Page 39 (7A) Line 14 -- The Council may modify a recommendation of the Planning Commission on a rezonin$ or change and may request and consider a report of the Commission on the modification. Failure of the Commission to report within 30 days after receipt of the Council request shall be deemed concurrence. Councilman Palombo recommended the following changes on page 10 of the Ordinance: On page 10, Section (b)(2) -- reduce the ~pecified densities by 50%. Then add Section (5) -- "Bonus adjustments should be determined and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council." City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page 7 Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to give first reading to Ordinance No. 123 with the suggested language changes as suggested by Councilman Palombo and himself and to set second reading for January 7, 1981. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 3C. ZONE CHANGE REQUEST NO. 80-18 - R.J. INVESTMENTS. Staff report presented b~/ ? Barry Hogan. Assistant City Manager, Jim Robinson, read the title of Ordinance No. 125. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ORDINANCE NO. 125 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OFTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 207-191-49-48 FROM R-1 TO R-3 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD WEST OFBAKERAVENUE. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no resoonse, the hearing was closed. Councilman Frost expressed that he could not see any way the one section zoned R-3 could be compatible with the R-1-T and felt the zone change was not appropriate. Council also expressed concern over the traffic flow off Baker onto Foothill Boulevard. Motion: Moved by Frost to deny the zone change request. For lack of a second the motion failed. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the zone change request. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Frost. ABSENT: None. ABSTAINED: Mikels. Councilman Mikels expressed that he abstained since his home was in the vicinity. 3D. ZONE CHANGE REQUEST NO. 80-19 - DIVERSIFIED. A zone change request for 16 acres of land located on the northeast corner of Base Line and Archibald from R-l-5 (single family residential) to A-P (administrative-professional) and R-3 (multiple family residential). APN 201-181-12, 21, and 22. Staff report presented by Barry Hogan. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 126. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5--0. ORDINANCE NO. 126 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 201-181-12, 21, AND 22. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing Council was: Mr. A. Douglas Wilson, 7074 Ramona Avenue, read a letter which he had sent to Mr. Wasserman expressing his opposition to the zone change. He recommended that a medical facility be located on this particular piece of property. There being no further public comment, Mayor Schlosser closed the public hearing. City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page 8 Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to approve the zone change and Ordinance No. 126. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 3E. ZONE CHANGE NO. 80-20 - Vanguard. A zone change request from R-R to R-1 on 10 acres of land located north of Arrow Highway, east of Archibald Avenue at the eastern terminus of Cerise and Placer Streets. APN 208-311-01. Staff report presented by Barry Hogan. Deputy City Clerk Beverly Authelet read title of Ordinance No.-127. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ORDINANCE NO. 127 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 208-311-01 FROM R-R TO R-1 LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW HIGHWAY AND EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Palombo to approve the zone change and Ordinance No. 127. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 3F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 80-03 - Adult Businesses. An ordinance establishing regulations of the location and review of adult businesses in the C-2 general business district. Staff report presented by Mr. Wasserman. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Ordinance No. 45-C. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to waive furthe~ reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. ORDINANCE NO. 45-C (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS FOR THE LOCATION AND REVIEW OF ADULT BUSINESSES IN THE C-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS) DISTRICT. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the hearing was closed. Motion: Moved by Frost, seconded by Mikels to approve Ordinance No. 45-C. The motion carried unanimously 5-0. MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 FOR TRACTS NOS. 3G. ANNEXATION NO. 2 TO LANDSCAPE 9176~ 9225~ 9436~ AA~ 9567. Staff report presented by Lloy~ Hubbs. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public comments. There being none, the public portion was closed. City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page 9 Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 80-111 and to waive entire reading. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. City Clerk Wasserman read title of Resolution No. 80-111. RESOLUTION NO. 80-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK IN CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION NUMBER 1 FOR TRACT NOS. 9176, 9225, 9435, AND 9567. 3H. APPEAL OF TREE REMOVAL PERMIT ISSUED FOR GLEN FRANKLIN. Staff report pre- sented by Lloyd Hubbs. The City had received an appeal for an approved Tree Removal Permit to remove eleven eucalyptus and palm trees located at 6730 Hellman Avenue. Mr. Hubbs said that two letters expressing opposition to the removal of the trees had been re- ceived by the City. Mayor Schlosser opened the meeting for public hearing. Dan Drake, speaking for his father-in-law who lived at 6754 Hellman Avenue, spoke in favor of having the tree removal request denied. Bob Lesondak, 6840 Hellman Avenue. spoke in favor of retaining the trees and the high curbs since the street was a water carrying street during the rainy season. There being no further co~m~ents from the audience, Mayor Schlosser closed the public portion of the meeting. Councilman Bridge expressed that it would be a crime to change Hellman Avenue now. He said that this particular variety of eucalyptus tree is clean and the way that they are planted is an asset to the city. Motion: Moved by Bridge seconded by Palombo to retain the curbs and trees on Hellman Avenue and to sustain the appeal. This is to be a precedent for the rest of Hellman Avenue. Also, to have a lien attached to this · particular piece of property in order to protect the future interest of the property and the city. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. Mayor Schlosser called a recess at 10:45 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 11:00 p.m. with all members of the Council and staff present. 4. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS. 4A. APPEAL OF DECISION REGARDING THE RED HILL COFFEE SHOP SIGN. Mayor Schlosser asked Mrs. Moffatt to come forward. He asked her if she has any alternatives to suggest to the staff recommendation. She stated there was three years left on the amoritation plan. They would be willing to m~lit the time with the city which would grant them eighteen months. After some discussion by the Council, the following motion was made: Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to allow the Moffatts eighteen months (June 1982) to amortize the Red Hill Coffee Shop sign. Motion passed by the following vote: AYES: Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: Frost. ABSENT: None. Frost said he opposed this because he felt we should comply with our own Ordinance and make this six months. City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page 10 4B. ONTARIO GROUND ACCESS STUDY. Staff report presented by Lloyd Hubbs. Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the allocation of $5,000 as our city's share toward the increased cost of the contract for the Ontario Ground Access Study. The amount to be allocated from the public circu- lation study fund. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. 4C. ADVISORY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE VICTORIA PLANNED - ! COMMUNITY. Staff report presented by Jim Robinson. Mr. Vlasic, Advisory Commission Chariman for the month of December, read a letter which had been sent to the Council requesting that the public hearings on the Victoria Planned Community be suspended until after the City's General Plan was adopted. The letter had received unanimously support by all Advisory Commissioners. Jim Banks, Etiwanda resident, suggested that the City Council become more involved in the General Plan process. He said the Co~nission has been hearing input from the citizens, but decisions are never made. Don Baer, Advisory Commissioner John Lyons, Foothill Fire District Board Member Gary Frye, William Lyon Company representative Ron Tannabaum, Etiwanda resident Marsha Banks, Etiwanda resident After hearing the comments from the audience, the Mayor closed the public portion of the meeting. Councilman Bridge said he favored going ahead with the planned community and the general plan at the same time since they really could not be separated. Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Mikels to concur with the Planning Co~issi~ recommendation to postpone the hearings on the Lyon Planned Community until January 1981. At that time to have only monthly meetings until the General Plan is adopted, then to return to the normal review schedule. Motion carried unanimo~ 5-0. Councilman Mikels said he wanted to see the General Plan coma to the Council in February. Council concurred. 4D. APPROVAL TO NEGOTIATE FOR ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. Councilman Frost excused himself from the Council ~able since he had an employer involved in this discussion. Motion: Moved by Mikeis, seconded by Palombo to authorize staff to negotiate time and material's contracts for design services for: 1. EDA Grant application preparation and coordination with L.D. King at an estimated budget of $5,000. 2. Victoria and Terra Vista Drainage Analysis review with L.D. King at an estimated budget of $5,000. City Council Minutes December 3, 1980 Page i1 3. Detailed Circulation Planning and Design review for General Plan Victoria, Terra Vista, Industrial Specific Plan with DKS Associates at an estimated budget of $10,000. 4. Minor roadway design services for Grove Avenue, Vineyard Avenue, the Demens Creek Bridge, and others with Associated Engineers at an estimated budget of $15,000. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES; Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Schlosser. NOES: None. ABSENT: Frost. 5. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none. 6. COUNCIL MATTERS. There were none. 7. ADJOURNMENT. Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adjourn to an Executive Session, not to reconvene this eyening, but to reconvene on December 11, at 7:00 p.m. for a Special Assessment District meeting at Lion's Park Conmmunity Center. The meeting adjourned at 12:35 a.m. Re~pect full~,submit ted, Beverly Authelet Deputy City Clerk