HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/12/19 - Minutes December 19, 1979
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the City Council was held in the Lion's Park Community Center,
9161 Baseline Road, Rancho Cucamonga, on Wednesday, December 19, 1979. The meeting
was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by Mayor James C. Frost who led in the pledge to the
flag.
Present: Councilmen Phillip Schlosser, Jon Mikels, Michael Palombo, Arthur Bridge,
and Mayor James C. Frost. Also present were staff members: City Manager, Lauren
Wasserman; Interim Assistant City Attorney, Robert Dougherty; Assistant City Manager,
Jim Robinson; Community Development Director, Jack Lam; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs;
Finance Director, Harry Empey; and Community Services Director, William Holley.
Approval of November 21, 1979 minutes. Motion: MoVed by Mikels, seconded by Palombo
to approve the November 21 minutes. Motion carried 5-0.
2. ANNOUNCEMENTS.
a. Mikels announced that on December 13 he had attended a SCAG public hearing on
the airport expansion. He had indicated to SCAG that Rancho Cucamonga took a "no
position" policy at this time. On January 3 SCAG could possibly take a vote on
the future expansion. He said that if Council wished to take a position, they could
do so at the January 2 City Council meeting. Other cities in the area had voiced
their opposition to the expansion.
b. Palombo presented a report from the recent Manpower meeting. He said the next
--- meeting would be Thursday, January 3, 1980.
He also reported that the Arrowhead Justice Association may be the recipient of a
$77,000 grant.
c. Advisory Commission meeting on December 20 at 6:30 p.m. in the Library Conference
Room had been cancelled.
d. Flood Control Advisory Commission will be meeting on December 20 in the city
offices conference room at 6:30 p.m.
e. Council should be naming a replacement for Mike Zinkin on the Citizens'
Advisory Commission at the January 2 meeting.
f. Mr. Wasserman gave a report on the elections meeting which had been held on
December 19 at Upland City Hall. He said that Upland City Hall will be the
processing center for the counting of votes on April 8, election day.
3. CONSENT CALENDAR.
a. Approval of Warrants: Register No. 79-12-19 for $458,550.82.
b. Set for public hearing on Janaury 2, 1980: Appeal of Site Approval No. 79-19.
Atlantic Richfield Company. Improvements and conversion to existing service station
--- located at 9533 Foothill into a mini-mart station. (0701-06 ~PPEAL)
c. Parcel Map 4907: Acceptance of Parcel Map, Agreement and Bonds.Il002-09 ?~RCEL (2)
Located northeast corner of Cleveland & 4th Street
Developer, Vince Stagliano (0602-01 AGREE IMP)
Faithful Performance Bond (road) $92,000
Labor & Material (road) $92,000
Monumentation $ 2,500
City Council Minutes
December 19, 1979
Page 2
RESOLUTION NO. 79-108
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP
NUMBER 4907, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4907) IMPROVE-
MENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
d. Parcel Map 4957: Acceptance of Parcel Map, Agreement and Bonds.(1002-09 P~RCELMAP)
Located southeast corner of Baseline and Hellman (0602-01 AGREE
Developer, Douglas and Kathleen Hone IMP)
Improvement Security (road) $30,000
RESOLUTION NO. 79-101
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL MAP
NUMBER 4957, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 4957),
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
(3) e. Parcel Map 4820: Acceptance of Parcel Map, Agreement and Bonds.(1002-09 P~tRCELMB_P)
Located southwest corner of Hellman and 9th Street (0602-01
Developer: Springer Company, Inc. IMP)
RESOLUTION NO. 79-106
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NUMBER 4820.
f. Parcel Map 5157: Acceptance of Parcel Map, Agreement and Bonds.{1002-09
Located northwest corner of Haven and 4th Street (0602-01 AGREE
Developer: John D. Lusk & Son. IMP)
Performance Bond $253,000
Labor & Material $253,000
Monumentation $ 3,500
RESOLUTION NO, 79-107
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PARCEL
MAP NUMBER 5157, (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 5157),
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY.
g. Refer claim by Robert J. Parcell in the amount of $713.05 to the City Attorney
for handling.
5. PUBLIC HEARINGS.
5A. An Ordinance repealing Ordinance No. 78 and the use of safe and sane
fireworks within the City of Rancho'Cucamonga. Staff report by Lauren
Wasserman. (1302-09 FIRE WORK)
Mayor opened the meeting for public hearing. Since there was no one wishing to
address Council, the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Schlosser to approve Ordinance No. 78~A
and waive entire reading.
Mayor expressed his feelings toward the ordinance stating that he had been opposed
to the sale of fireworks in the past; however, because there had not been any
specific reasons to substantiate changing the present ordinance, he was changing
his former position.
Mikels suggested that the issue should go before the voters as the City of Chino
was doing. Mayor felt this was quite expensive, and that it was Council's responsi-
bility to make such decisions.
Motion: The former motion was defeated by the following vote: AYES: Bridge and
Schlosser. NOES: Palombo, Mikels, and Frost. ABSENT: None.
Council set January 2 to continue discussion. At that time they wanted information
regarding additional funding for the Sheriff's Department and Fire District. Also
cost of putting issue on the ballot.
City Council Minutes
December 19, 1979
Page 3
5B. General Plan Amendment No. 79-03D~ 79-03F~ and 79-03I by the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. Staff report by Barry Hogan. (0203~03 GP
The Council at its December 5 meeting, reviewed all of the General Plan Amendments
and completed the public hearing. However, because the Council desired certain
changes to the General Plan Amendment No. 79-03F, the final Resolution was not adopted.
Ail changes which the Council had requested have been made in Resolution No. 79-102.
The meeting was opened for public hearing. Since there was no one wishing to address
Council, the hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adopt Resolution No. 79-102 and to
waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title
read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ADOPTED
INTERIM LAND USE, CIRCULATION, AND PUBLIC FACILITIES
ELEMENT OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN.
5C. Ordinances design, at.lng historical landmarks and points of interest in Rancho (6)
Cucamonga. Staff report by Bill Holley. (1402-06 HISTORY)
Meeting was opened for public hearing for Ordinance No. 92. Since there was no
one wishing to address Council, the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Ordinance No. 92 and to
waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. Number and title read by Wasserman.
ORDINANCE NO. 92 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
CASA DE RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE CUCAMONGA RANCHO
WINERY AS SIGNIFICANT HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE CITY
AND THEREFORE DESIGNATING EACH AS A CITY HISTORIC
LANDMARK.
Meeting was opened for publiC hearing for Ordinance No. 93. There was no one
wishing to address Council,~therefore the public hearing was closed. (1402-06
HISTORY)
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to adopt Ordinance No. 93 and to
waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title
read by Wasserman.
ORDINANCE NO. 93 (second reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
GARCIA RANCH HOUSE, SYCAMORE INN, THE CUCAMONGA
CHINATOWN SITE, THE COUSINS HOUSE, THE MILLIKEN
RANCH, AND THE TAPIAADOBE SITE AS SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC POINTS OF INTEREST OF THE CITY AND THEREFORE
DESIGNATING EACH AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORIC INTEREST.
City Council Minutes
December 19, 1979
Page 4
5D. Request of Historic Preservation Commission for designation of the Alta
Loma Railway Station site as a point of historic interest. Staff report by
Bill Holley. (1402-06 HISTORY)
The Historic Preservation Commission held a public hearing on November 13
regarding the designation of the Alta Loma Railway Station as a historic land-
mark of the City. After considerable discussion, the Commission voted unanimously
that the landmark designation was not feasible for various technical reasons not
related to its historical significance. However, the Commission voted unanimously
to recommend to Council a designation as a point of historic interest.
Bill Holley turned the meeting over to Leonard Gorczyca, chairman of the
Commission, who asked the City Council for guidelines on the enforcement of Ordinance
No. 70. Mr. Wasserman said it would be appropriate for the Council to refer this
back to the Historical Commission for study. Council concurred this should be
referred to the Historical Commission for an interpretation, and then back to
Council on January 16.
The meeting was opened for public hearing.
Doug Hone suggested that perhaps the City Council should review all franchises
granted to the railroads.
·
Public hearing was closed.
Mikels said we should learn what rights we have in regard to railroad franchises.
The City Attorney said he could write the County Department of Transportation for
records of all franchises granted to the City.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to set January 2 for second reading
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title
read by Wasserman.
ORDINANCE NO. 95 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOGNIZING THE
ALTA LOMA RAILWAY STATION SITE AS A SIGNIFICANT
HISTORIC POINT OF INTEREST OF THE CITY AND THERE-
FOR DESIGNATING IT AS A CITY POINT OF HISTORIC
INTEREST.
(9) 5E. Vacation of Alder Street. Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. (1110-18 VACATE ST)
December 19 had been set for public hearing on the vacation of offer of dedication
for Alder Street. Notice of the public hearing had been published in the Daily
Report on December 3, 1979. No objections to the proposed vacation had been received.
Meeting was opened for public hearing. There was no one who wished to address Council,
therefore, the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Bridge, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No. 79-109
and to waive the entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES:
Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Title
and number read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-109
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING TO BE
VACATED A PORTION OF ALDER STREET, AN OFFER OF
DEDICATION AS SHOWN ON MAP (NO. V-005) ON FILE
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA.
Ci't}~, Counc~i l~i-nutes
December 19, 1979
Page 5
5F. Condominium Conversions. Staff report by Jack Lam. (0203-04 HOUSING) (10)
The Planning Division had received preliminary requests for the conversion of rental
units to ownership units. This had prompted the City to address the issue of condo-
minium conversions. Interest in converting resulted from maDy factors including
expanding rent control laws, difficulty in obtaining loans for apartment projects,
---- and the potential profits to be made from such conversions. Many cities in California
have adopted regulations and development~standards for condominium conversions to
offset this demand. Presently, Rancho Cucamonga has no ordinance governing condo-
- minium conversions.
It was recommended that the City Council concur with the recommendation of the
Planning Commission to adopt an ordinance placing a freeze on condominium conversions
and to proceed with the work program to develop an ordinance regulating condominium
conversions.
Schlosser asked how many requests have there been? Mr. Lam said only two, but that
we had very few apartment units and having only one conversion would represent 8 to
10 percent of the apartments.
Schlosser asked why was this an urgency measure? Mr. Lam stated that apartment owners
do not want to own apartments any longer since there is a ballot initiative for rent
control. They do not want rent control. Condominium conversions would eliminate this
problem. This was also coming now since the BIA had requested that condominium con-
versions be deleted from the Growth Management Plan since it did not impact the
schools or sewers. This ordinance and work program is in response to that lacking
control.
Mikels supported staff's recommendations to work out an agreement. He felt apart-
ment dwellers would have difficulty finding housing or a down payment for condominiums
if these were converted.
The meeting was opened for public hearing.
Herman Rempel, Chairman of the Planning Commission, felt staff and Planning Commission
could control this. He also stated that the Planning Commission had not seen this
ordinance.
John Withers, BIA, spoke on rent control and the negative impact it had on rental
housing.
Public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palombo to table item for further study and to
bring back at the January 2 meeting.
Mr. Lam responded to Mr. Rempel's statement. He said the Planning Commission does
not review urgency ordinances; these are reviewed by the City Council. The Planning
Commission had voted unanimously to place a freeze on condominium conversions.
Palombo called for the question. Those in favor of calling for the question:
Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None.
~Motion that was. previously made to table Ordinance No. 97 was approved by,
following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Palombo, and Frost. NOES: Bridge and Mikels.
ABSENT: None.
Mayor asked Council if they wished to proceed with the work program to develop an
ordinance regulating condominium conversions. Lam asked Council what they wished
from staff regarding this issue. Wasserman suggested that the work program be dis-
cussed at the same time as the ordinance. Council told Mr. Lam they wanted to know
exactly what the issues were. How will condominium conversions affect the rental
market? What problems would be presented for the building industry.
RECESS. At 9:05 p.m. the mayor called a recess. At 9:15 p.m. the meeting reconvened
with all members of the Council and staff present.
Mayor said Dr. Guith, Superintendent of Central School District, came to him
during the recess and asked to have their ite~ removed from the agenda since a
City Council Minutes
December 19, 1979
Page 6
meeting had been set with the BIA for sometime in February.
Barry Hogan said that none of the 132 units within the Central School District
would be pulling permits during this time probably not until February or March.
He said they will be meeting about February 2 with the BIA. Dr. Guith concurred
that this arrangement would be fine.
(11) 5G. Revision to Ordinance No. 8, Section 7, ...of the Park Tax Fee Ordinance.
Staff report by Jack Lam. (0401-12 FEE)
In October, Council directed staff to clarify Section 7 of Ordinance No. 8 dealing
with park tax credit.
The Planning Commission, at its meeting of December 12, 1979, recommended that
the City Council amend Ordinance No. 8 by deleting Section 7 in its entirety. This
recommendation was made on the basis that the General Plan consultants were preparing
a Park and Recreation Element and that data was needed so that a new ordinmmce could
be written to conform with the objectives of that element. Therefore, in the
interim, the Commission had suggested elimination of Section 7 of Ordinance No. 8.
It is the City's intent that upon adoption of the Parks and Recreation Element that
Ordinance No. 8 would be revised in its entirety to be consistent with the standards
and policies as set forth in the new element.
The meeting was opened for public hearing. Since there was no one who wished to
address Council, the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to set January 2 for second reading
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title
read by Wasserman.
ORDINANCE NO. 8~A (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 8 (ELIMINATING SECTION 7 IN ITS ENTIRETY AND
AMENDING SECTION 8, 9, AND 10)'AN ORDINANCE ESTA-
BLISHING A PARK AND RECREATION TAX FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT.
(12) 5H. Negative Declaration and Zoning Ordinance Amendment~No, 79'05 by. the City of
Rancho CUc~mon~~. st'aff report by ~ac~ L-aM and .Ba'rry Ho'gan. (0203-09 DD
There have been two presentations for proposed planned communities, Terra Vista
and Victoria. These planned communities encompass over 3,000 acres of land
within the heart of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In order to guide the
development of the Planned Communities and provide for all of the amenities desired,
the staff and Planning Commission have developed a Planned Community Ordinance.
Mr. Hogan said that Section 4G did not convey the Planning Commission's intent and
the last sentence should be changed to read as follows:
"Dedication for other forms of access such as pedestrian ways, plazas, --~
driveways, horse trails, bike trails, or open parking lots may be
offered but specific determination as to whether it meets standards
for open space or park dedication requirements will be determined by
the Planning Commission and City Council at the time of development
plan or tentative map consideration."
City Council Minutes
December 19, 1979
Page 7
Mikels requested the language be revised in Section k so approval would not be
by both the Planning Commission and the City Council. He felt it should be recom-
mended by the Planning Commission with final approval by the City Council.
The City Attorney said that according to Section 65857 of the Zoning Ordinance,
--- that the legislative body may approve, modify, or disapprove a recommendation of
the Planning Commission, but any amendment or modification not previously considered
by the Planning Commission at its hearing shall be referred to the Planning Com-
mission for a report and recommendation. The Planning Commission is not required to
hold a public hearing. Failure of the Planning Commission to respond within 40 days
shall be deemed as approval by the legislative body.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to refer back to the Planning
Commission for consideration of changes in Section 4G and also to consider that
approval not be by both the Planning Commission and City Council as in section 4K.
Meeting opened for public hearing.
Gene Hoggart, Lewis Homes, Opposed the delay. He urged Council not to send this
back to the Planning Commission. He felt there was no reason to do so since the
Planning Commission's intent was plain.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Mikels to refer back to the Planning
Commission for consideration of changes in Section 4G and also to consider that
approval not be by both the Planning Commission and City Council as in section 4K
and to suggest to the Planning Commission to have the item back to Council for
the January 16 agenda. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
5I. Negative Declaration and Zone Change No. 79-09 by Anderson. Staff report by (13)
Barry Hogan. (0203-09 DDBJ~END)
A change of zone from R-1 to R-3 on 19.11 acres of land located on the east side of
Vineyard between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route.
Meeting opened for public hearing. Since there was no one wishing to address Council,
the public hearing was closed.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to set January 2 for second reading
and to'waive entire reading of Ordinance No. 96. Motion carried by the following
vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
Number and title read by Wasserman.
ORDINANCE NO. 96 (first reading)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSORS
PARCEL NO. 208-241-02, AND 14 FROM R-1 TO R-3
ON 19.11 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF VINEYARD AVENUE SOUTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD.
6. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS.
6A. Item had been removed. Council moved item "G" into this place.
Review of Pro~ect Esperanza's quarterly annual performance report. Staff report by
Bill Holley. (1180-06 CLUB)
Meeting was opened for public input. Those addressing Council were:
Carrmelo Camararo, a Vista Worker.
Art Ayala
Dr. Armando Navarro
City Council Minutes
December 19, 1979
Page 8
Dr. Navarro requested more time from Council in order for funding to come through.
It was hoped that they would be receiving money from the County Manpower at the
end of January and further funding by United Way for the next fiscal year.
Palombo, who serves on the Manpower board, said they had not made any decision
as to who would receive funding. They had their last meeting on December 13.
Chuck Buquet said he served on the United Way committee. Dr. Navarro's program
was funded last year However, it has not been funded for this next year yet
A girl addressed Council who lived in another barrio. She requested that Council
consider helping these kids
Mikels suggested that Council had another option and that was to fund the program
for an additional two months after which the Council could review the program
funding.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Bridge to fund.the program for three more
months subject to the next quarterly report. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None.
(15) 6B. Bicycle Licensing Resolution. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. {0400-05 REV & TD~X)
Tom Wickum, captain of the Sheriff's substation, answered questions regarding
licensing of bikes.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to approve Resolution No. 79-105
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title
read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-105
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING THE RE-
GISTRATION AND LICENSING OF BICYCLES AND MOTORIZED
BICYCLES.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve Resolution No. 79-104
and waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge. NOES: Frost. ABSENT: None. Frost stated he felt this
should be referred back to staff to come up with an assessment on whether it
would not be cheaper for city to buy licenses and give them away. Number and
title read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-104
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING FEES .....
FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BICYCLE LICENSE AND ALSO THE
RENEWAL THEREOF.
(16) 6C. SCAG Resolution on Growth Forecast Policy. Staff report by Jack Lam.(0203-05
GROW MGMT)
Previously Council had adopted SCAG's Air Quality Maintenance Plan but did not
adopt SCAG's Wastewater Plan. Both of these documents were developed using the
SCAG-78 Growth Forecast Policy as a population guide.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 79-111
and to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title
read by Wasserman.
City Council Minutes
December 19, 1979
Page 9
RESOLUTION NO. 79-111
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, IN CONCURRENCE
WITH THE SCAG-78 GROWTH FORECAST POLICY.
6D. Award of Traffic Signal Contract: Baseline and Hellman; Archibald and Church (17)
Street (FAU projects). Staff report by Lloyd Hubbs. (0602-01 CONTRACT)
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to award bid to Grissom and Johnson,
the low bidder, at a total of $108,050~to be funded through FAU funds. Motion
carried .by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost.
NOES: NOne.
6E. Car Allowance for Senior Planner. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. (18)
(0205-01 BUDGET)
In the preparation of the budget, the car allowance for the senior planner was
inadvertantly excluded. The senior planner uses his car for city purposes in the
dispensation of his duties and should be compensated the same as other managers.
Funds are available for this compensation.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palombo to approve an auto allowance of
$75.00 per month for the senior planner. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Schlosser, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: Mikels. (he
had temporarily left the room).
6F. Resolutions re~rding election matters. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. (19)
(0702-03 E~gCTION)
---- ~ discussed at the December 5 city council meeting, information regarding the filing
of nomination papers with associated fees have been put into resolution form. Also,
it is necessary that a resolution be adopted requesting the Registrar of Voters
services in providing precinct index of registered voters, combined roster index of
voters, and data processing tape for mailing labels.
Motion: Moved by Mikels to limit campaign donations from individuals and organiza-
tions not to exceed "x amount of dollars." For lack of a second, the motion failed.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Bridge to adopt Resolution No. 79-110 and
waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. Number and title
read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS
FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE, PERTAINING TO
MATERIALS SUBMITTED TO THE ELECTORATE AND THE COSTS
THEREOF FOR THE MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN
SAID CITY ON TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve Resolution No. 79-112 and
to waive entire reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Schlosser,
Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. Number and title read by Wasserman.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-112
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO
PERMIT THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF SAID COUNTY TO
RENDER SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, RELATING TO THE CONDUCT OF A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON APRIL
8, 1980.
City Council Minutes
December 19, 1979
Page 10
(20) 6H. Report regarding Codification. Staff report by Lauren Wasserman. (0701-13 CODE)
Mr. Wasserman made an oral report regarding codification. He said the city had
received proposals from three companies who desired to do the city's codifi-
cation of ordinances. These were: Municipal Codes from Tallahasse, Florida,
at an approximate cost of $7,000. Coded Systems from Brielle, New Jersey, at an
approximate cost of $4,000; and Book Publishing Company of Seattle, Washington,
at an approximate cost of $4,000. After talking with local city clerks as to
levels of service they were receiving, it was being recommended that Council
approve the contract with Book Publishing Company.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to approve the proposal with Book
Publishing Company not to exceed $4,000 from the contingency fund, and to authorize
the mayor and city clerk to execute agreements. Motion carried by the following
vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. NOES: None.
(21) 6I. Set a public hearing. Item had been left off the Consent Calendar. It was
requested that January 2, 1980 be set for public hearing for the Vacation of 8th
Street. (1110-18 VACATION ST)
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to set the public hearing for the
vacation of 8th Street for January 2, 1980. Motion carried 5-0.
(22) 6J. Added item. Mr. Wasserman made an oral report that the Building and Safety
Division had made the following policy: (0102-02 POLICY)
"Ail tile roofs composed of brittle, non-flexible materials,
such as concrete or clay, shall be installed using the underlay
required by Section 3302 (d) of the Uniform Building Code, re- ~__~
gardless of any alternative approval or recommendation to the
contrary by manufacturer or approval agency.
Additionally, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is to be considered
as being within a high wind area, and installation of "hurricane
clips" or similar hold-down devices are to be installed for tile
roofs hereafter applied."
7. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORTS. There were none.
(23) 8. NEW BUSINESS. (0704-12 JUSTICE CTR)
a. Schlosser will not be at the 3anuary 16 meeting. He will be in Washington
D.C. for the "White House Conference on Small Business."
b. Bridge brought up the Guasti Park issue. He felt Council should be looking
at the problem which centers on the proposed location of the County Justice
Center southeast of Archibald and 4th Street on land purchased by the County
for the expansion of Guasti Park. The County has requested the State for per-
mission to use a portion of this land which is designated as park land for the
Justice Center.
Bridge recommended that Council concur with Mr. Holley's suggestion to request
the County to provide a copy of the full proposal to Council as it directly
affects the residents of Rancho Cucamonga, and ask that a final decision on the
Justice Center's location be delayed until the County is able to consider the
City's input.
9, ADJOURNMENT.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Bridge to adjourn. Motion carried by the following
vote: AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Palombo, Bridge, and Frost. The meeting adjourned at
11:45 p.m.
Respectfulj~M submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk