HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979/01/15 - Minutes - Adjourned January 15, 1979
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
Adjourned Regular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the City Council was held at
the Community Service Building, 9161 Baseline Road,
Rancho Cucamonga. The January 3, 1979 meeting had
adjourned to Monday, January 15, 1979 since Council
would be attending the League of California Cities
conference in San Francisco on the usual Wednesday
Council meeting day.
The meeting was called to order at 7:08 p.m. by Mayor
James C. Frost.
ROLL CALL Present: Council members Mikels, Schlosser, Palombo, West and Mayor Frost.
City Manager Lauren Wasserman; Interim City Attorney,
Sam Crowe; City Engineer, Lloyd Hubbs; and Community
Development Director, Jack Lam.
MINUTES Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve
the minutes of December 20, 1978 and January 3, 1979.
Motion unanimously carried.
ANNOUNCEMENTS 1. Mrs. Barbara Verburg, President of the Rancho
Cucamonga Women's Club presented to the City an award
winning Community Improvement Project Achievement
Book which was a compilation of news i~ems, phamplets,
--- etc. pertinent to the Women's Club participation in the
incorporation effort.
2. Announcement that the next Advisory Committee meeting
would be February 15 in the Library Conference Room.
3. The Fact Finding Committee would be meeting Thursday,
January 25 at 7:00 p.m. in the Library Conference Room.
4. On Monday, January 22, at 10:00 a.m. Mayor Frost
along with other mayors in the area will be meeting with
Governor Brown to discuss the Foothill Freeway.
5. Thursday, January 25, Wasserman will be escorting
the California Transportation Commission on a tour
through the community to show them the proposed Foothill
Freeway route.
6. Friday, January 26, the California Transportation
Commission will be conducting public hearings in the
San Bernardino City Council Chambers. Results of this
hearing will be to determine whether a study should be
initiated for the future of the Foothill Freeway.
CONSENT The following items were presented for approval on the
........ CALENDAR Consent Calendar:
a. Approval of warrants in the amount of $30,677.15.
b. Claim against the city for injuries and damages
suffered by Randy E. Fremming be referred to
the city.attorney for handling.
c. Authorization for City Manager and Mayor to
attend the National League of Cities in March in
Washington. Amount for conference had been budgeted.
d. Recommendation that City Council receive and file
the semiannual report from the County Environmental
Health Services which outlined services provided the city
from January through June 1978.
e. Approval of application for Alcoholic Beverage-- Pizza Hut, 6709 Carnelian Ave.
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1979
Page 2
CONSENT f. Release Instrument of Credit and Agreement in the
CALENDAR amount of $3,000 to Robert A. and Sandra G. Shur
(continued) (land division 73-0598).
g. Tract 9002: Accept roads and release bonds to Sam Miguel.
Performance bond (road) $110,000.
h. Tract 9003: Accept roads and release bonds to
Sunflower Land Company, Inc.
Performance bond (road) $46,000
i. Tract 9116: Accept roads and release bonds to Gary G. Miller.
Performance bond (road) $32,000
j. Tract 9320: Accept roads and release bonds to
Lewis Homes of California.
Performance bond (road) ~74,000
k. Tract 9341: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis Homes of California.
Performance bond (sewer) $16,000
Performance bond (water) $26,000
Performance bond (road) $56,000
1. Tract 9342: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis
Homes of California
Performance bond (sewer) $21,000
Performance bond (water) $26,000
Performance bond (road) $70,000
m. Tract 9343: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis Homes of California.
Performance bond (sewer) $20,000
Performance bond (water) $23,000
Performance bond (road) $60,000
n. Tract 9344: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis Homes of California.
Performance bond (sewer) $23,000
Performance bond (road) $28,000
Performance bond (road) $64,000
o. Tract 9345: Accept roads and release bonds to Lewis Homes of California.
Performance bond (sewer) $17,000
Performance bond (water) $21,000
Performance bond (road) $52,000
p. Tract 9387: Release of bond to Chavanne Realty, Inc.
Performance bond (water) $39,000
q. Tract 9379: Release of bond to Chavanne Realty, Inc.
Performance bond (water) $20,000
r. Tract 9401: Accept roads and release bonds to Olympus
Pacific Corporation.
Performance bond (road) $274,000
s. Tract 9586: Release of bonds to Lewis Homes of California.
Performance bond (sewer) $33,000
Performance bond (water) $63,000
t. Tract 9587: Release of bonds to Lewis Homes of California.
Performance bond (sewer) $24,000
Performance bond (water) $26,000
u. Tract 9636: Accept roads and release bonds to
Chevron Construction Company.
Performance bond (sewer) $18,000
Performance bond (water) $28,000
Performance bond (road) $80,000
v. Tract 9280: Accept roads and release bonds to Bob Jensen Builder, Inc.
Performance bond (sewer) $38,000
Performance bond (water) $55,000
Performance bond (road) $144,000
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to approve
the consent calendar. Motion unanimously carried.
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1979
Page 3
PUBLIC HEARING Zone Change No. 78-05 request by Southern California (1)
Lutheran Church to change the zone from R-1 to A-P
Zone Change 78-05 for 5.51 acres of land located on the west side of Haven
Avenue, north of Lemon.
Ordinance No 51
(second reading) Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to approve
the zone change, adopt Ordinance No. 51, and waive
entire reading. Title and number read by Wasserman.
Motion unanimously carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 51
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 201-261-08 FROM R-1 TO A-P.
PUBLIC HEARING Zone Change No. 78-06 request by Hone/Gorgen to change (2)
the zone from R-1 to A-P for 9.7 acres of land located
Zone Change 78-06 on the southwest corner of Baseline and Hellman.
Ordinance No. 52 Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to approve
(second reading) the zone change, adopt Ordinance No. 52, and waive entire
reading. Title and number read by Wasserman. Motion
unanimously carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 52
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REZONING ASSESSOR'S
PARCEL NO. 208-011-02 and 04.
PUBLIC HEARING Zone Change No. 103-67 by Louis R. Parks. An appeal of (3)
the Planning commission's decision to deny request to
--- Louis Parks change zone from A-l-5 (limited agriculture) to C-1
(limited commercial) for property located on the south
side of 19th Street approzimately 1500 feet east of
Hermosa. Staff report was presented by Jack Lam.
Purpose of zone change was to convert an existing 73 year
old residence, the Albert House, into a restaurant. A
detailed report describing characteristics of the
restaurant, menu, decor, etc. had been given to Council
members.
The area on the proposed General Plan indicates low
density residentR~81. Planning Commission's recommendation
was to deny the zone request.
Mayor asked if anyone was present in favor of the proposal.
No one came forth.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to accept the
Planning Commission's recommendation and deny the zone
change appeal. Motion unanimously carried.
PUBLIC HEARING An Ordinance amending Ordinance NO.30 pertaining to (4)
financing of interim school facilities. The purpose of
Ordinance No.56 the ordinance is to make it clear that in those cases
(first reading) where a building permit is issued by an agency other than
the city that the school fees are paid directly to the
city.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to waive
entire reading and pass ordinance on for second reading
and adoption at the February 7 meeting. Title and number
read by Wasserman. Motion unanimously carried.
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1979
Page 4
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. 56
Ordinance No. 56 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
(first reading) OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 30 PERTAINING TO FINANCING OF INTERIM SCHOOL
(continued) FACILITIES.
PUBLIC HEARING (5) An Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 8 which pertains _~
to a park and recreation tax for new residential develop-
Ordinance No. 57 ment. Since the city is not the enforcing agency for
(first reading) the purPose of issuing building permits for mobile home
spaces in mobile home parks, it is necessary to insure
that the city can collect its park and recreation tax.
Motion: Moved by Schlosser, seconded by Palombo to waive
entire reading and set Frebruary 7 for second reading and
adoption. Title and number read by Wasserman. Motion
unanimously carried.
ORDINANCE NO.57
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING ORDINANCE
No. 8 WHICH PERTAINS TO A PARKAND RECREATION TAX
FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
PUBLIC HEARING (6) An Ordinance designating certain city officers and
employees to enforce certain portions of the city code.
Ordinance No. 54 The ordinance designates certain city officers while
(first reading) the Resolution specifically designates the individuals
by name. The primary person with the responsibility is
Resolution No. the new Code Enforcement Officer, Gary Richards. This
79-3 person was hired per Council approval and is responsible __
to deal with complaints that come to the city regarding
code violations.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Schlosser to
adopt Resolution No. 79-3; approve Ordinance No. 54,
set February 7 for second reading and adoption; and
waive the entire readings of Resolution and Ordinance.
Titles and numbers of resolution and ordinance were
read by Wasserman. Motion unanimously carried.
ORDINANCE NO.54
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGARDING THE POWER
OF CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE CITY
ORDINANCES AND ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CODES
REFERRED TO THEREIN.
RESOLUTION NO. 79-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING
CERTAIN CITY EMPLOYEES TO ENFORCE CITY ORDINANCES
AND ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CODES REFERRED TO THEREIN.
PUBLIC HEARING (?) An urgency ordinance to extend Ordinance 45 until
August 1, 1979. This will continue the moratorium on
Ordinance No. 55 any adult businesses until the city has developed an
(urgency) ordinance.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to adopt
Ordinance No. 55 as an urgency ordinance. Title and
number read by Wasserman. Motion unanimously carried
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1979
Page 5
PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. 55
Ordinance No. 55 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
(urgency) OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 45 PERTAINING TO INTERIM ZONING
(continued) FOR ADULT BUSINESSES AJ~D DECLARING THE URGENCY
THEREOF.
PUBLIC HEARING Jack Lam presented staff report. Council had referred a number of items back to the Planning Commission.
General Plan
Council consensus was that these items had received
(continuation)
public hearing before the Council and Planning
Commission, therefore, council would procede through
these without further public input.
Interim Land-
Use Elements
1. North side of Foothill between Turner and Center. (8)
Original designation was for service commercial on the
northwest corner; mixed use for the remaining frontage
on Foothill; and low density residential for the rear
portion.
Owners desired for commercial across the Foothill frontage
and high density residential to the rear.
West said he agreed with the Planning Commission's decision.
Mayor expressed this one strip should not be commercial
but to retain the original mixed use designation.
Mikels asked again for the uses allowed in a mixed use area.
Lam said they would be basically administrative-professional
type uses ~nich could include a restaurant, lending
institution, and some ancilliary type uses such as a print
shop and the ability to zone certain areas for multi-family.
Mikels questioned how could there be control over traffic,
parking, curb cuts and coordination of the intermix of the
uses since parcels were small.
Lam pointed out each parcel and showed each one was at
least one acre on a map. He said size was not the problem,
but the depth. Therefore, any development would have to be
designed in such a way to be well coordinated in terms of
access through the entire block. Planning Commission had
asked owners if they would be interested in master planning
of the area and they had indicated yes. They were also
interested in full design of projects.
The Planning Commission recommended to extend the service
commercial to Center at a depth of 300 feet and the
remaining 300 feet to the rear as mixed use.
Motion: Palombo felt the staff had a control on the
development and moved to uphold the Planning Commission's
revised recommendation to designate service commercial
on the Foothill frontage and mixed use on the rear portion.
Seconded by West. Motion passed by the following vote:
AYES: West, Palombo, Schlosser
NOES: Frost, Mikels
ABSENT: None
2. East side of Haven between Highland and Lemon. (9)
The Planning Commission in their review felt unanimously
that one tier of lots were needed on the south side of
Lemon to insure separation of residential and mixed
use traffic. The Planning Commission felt they could not
insure this if mixed use designation were allowed all the
way to Lemon. Therefore, they recommended to retain
the General Plan designations.
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1979
Page 6
PUBLIC HEARING Motion: MOved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to uphold
the Planning Commission's recommendation of mixed use
General Plan and low density residentail. Motion unanimously carried.
(continuation)
(10) 3. Southside of Foothill Boulevard between Rochester
Interim Land- Avenue and Day Creek.
Use Elements
(continued) Owner had requested service commercial extension to enable
him to develop an auto service establishment. It was
felt that since the Industrial Committee of the Chamber
of Commerce was studying in depth the feasibility of
allowing such uses in a minimum impact industrial area,
the Commissinn felt there was no justificaion to extend
the service commercial designation at this time.
For background, Lam stated that with the formulatiQn of
major and minimum impact industrial there is still a
lot of leeway as to the interpretation of kinds of uses
which should go into each designation. This could be
formed by a zoning process and development zoning. The
Industrial Committee had a desire to further study the
area to determine if there were any measures which could be
developed to allow certain uses which may not generally be
considered at the General Plan level.
One of these considerations was how much service commercial
type uses should be allowed in the industrial area.
Currently the M-1 district allows almost anything. Some
forms of service commercial should be allowed, but how
much, where should it be, and how should it be handled
are unknown.
The Industrial Committee wants to study this further to
develop a specific plan to answer these questions and to .......
develop a specific zoning package and specific design
standards and criteria for the industrial areas. Therefore,
in order not to make a piecemeal decision on this parti-
cular industrial area, the Planning Commission felt this
was one of the things the Industrial Committee should look
at. Therefore, the Planning Commission recommends to
retain the minimum impact industrial designation.
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to accept
the Planning Commission's recommendation to maintain the
minimum industrial designation. Motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Schlosser, Mikels, Frost
NOES: Palombo, West
ABSENT: None
(11) 4. Northside of Baseline, west of Archiblad adjacent
to existing Alpha Beta shopping center.
Owner desired commercial designation with the possibility
of building additional and/or an extension to the present
shopping center. The Planning Commission discussed the
possibility of such additional shopping center at this
location and additional retain at this critical intersection.---
they also discussed the aspects of traffic and the concept
which they had discussed in previous meetings that the
character of Baseline should be one of administrative and
Professional. Considering all these factors, Lam said the
Planning Commission recommended to maintain the present
General Plan designation of mixed use
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by Mikels to uphold
the Planning Commission's decision to maintain the mixed
use designation. Motion unanimously carried.
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1979
Page 7
PUBLIC HEARING 5. Additional item for information only.
General Plan Item was discussed at the Planning Commission. Area (12)
_(continuation) west side of Archibald between the Cucamonga Wash bounded
by 7th and 4th.
Interim Land-
Use Elements There has been discussion between the Industrial Committee
of the Chamber of Commerce as to whether this should be
(continued) residential or industrial.
Lam pointed out there were facts to consider such as
there is a residential tract there presently. Question
as to how to provide proper interface type regulations
which would protect the residential area and provide
adequate buffer between existing and proposed industrial
uSeSo
It was proposed to the Planning Commission by staff that
since the area does have some potential for some industrial
activity and since the Industrial Committee was going to
study the area anyway, the Planning Commission would
entertain any kind of proposal to consider modifying to some
other use providing there were mechanics and devices
developed to protect the residential tract. At the present
time the Planning Commission wants to maintain the area
as low density residential so as not to isolate the tract
until such a plan has been formed and completed by the
Industrial Committee.
After some discussion, the Council agreed to concur with
the Planning Commission to maintain the area as low
density residential.
Chaffey College Dr. Cantanzaro, President of Chaffey College, addressed (13)
the Council regarding the designation around the college.
The General Plan designation was for medium density resi-
dential. The college desired to have Council reconsider
and designate the area low density residential. He said
the higher density would create possible traffic hazards
and security problems that may result from high density
and medium density. He felt that whatever was allowed to
go in would have a lasting effect on the institution.
It was presently an open insitiution--unsecured, and
the college wanted to maintain that.
Dr. Hartley, chairperson of the Faculty Senate at
Chaffey College, was the official representative
of the entire faculty. He spoke for the faculty
to appeal the decision of the land-use designation
around Chaffey College and wished to go on record
as being in favor of low density designation around
the campus.
Council questioned how the college expected to have
access to the park on the east since this was private
land and would be developed. Council also questioned the
type of security, whether other colleges had campus
police, and the increase of vandalism over the last
two years since housing development had increased near
the college.
President Cantanzaro said there had been a significant
increase in vandalism relating to property. However,
he felt the important point he wanted emphasized was
that presently the college had only one security officer
on duty at all times. When a college has high density
around it, then there is the heed to spend funds to
secure the campus. This they did not want to do.
Marlin Dickey, instructor in the Geology Department at
the college, addressed the issue of the earthquake faults
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1979
Page 8
PUBLIC HEARING near the college. He pointed out the Cucamonga and
Red Hill faults on a map. He said the State is presently
General Plan considering altering their map to include this area as
(continuation) a special study zone. He also pointed out two other
inferred faults from the Red Hill fault. These run
Interim Land- immediately south of the college and range from immediately
Use Elements adjacent to the college campus along the lower edge of the
(continued) campus and about ¼ mile away located approximately
half way between the Red Hill fault and the edge of the
campus. He said these three faults would indicate some
seismic risk within the vacinity of the college.
Mikels asked who would carry out such a study. Dickey
said the State Divsion of Mines and Geology. This
had never been done since there was relatively little
development in the area until recently. He felt until such
studies were complete that the lowest density possible
should be designated for the area.
Motion: Palombo made a motion to maintain the Planning
Commission's recommendation until a seismic study is
completed then the Plan could be altered. For lack of
a second the motion failed.
Council continued discussion. Schlosser felt this
should be delayed for two weeks for further study.
Council agreed, item was tabled to refer to the 'February
7 meeting.
Vanir Development (14)Ben Diminguez of Vanir Development asked the Council if
they would entertain the designations for 19th and
Archibald of four acres with high density designation
and three acres of A-P designation. Council concurred
this was more in line with their concept for the area.
However, the item should go to the Planning Commission.
Mikels requested that the Planning Commission examine the
need this development would necessitate for traffic
signalization and how this development would increase
traffic flow.
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Mikels to refer
the 19th and Archibald request back to the Planning
Commission. Motion carried on the following vote:
AYES: Mikels, Palombo, West, Frost
NOES: None
ABSENT: Schlosser (temporarily)
Reserve Area (15) Wayne Blanton spoke regarding lack of zoning. In
particular he addressed the area from the Metropolitan
Water Line just below 24th Street shown on the General
Plan map as "Reserve Area". He would like to see ½
acre zoning like some of their neighbors.
Lam said some of the residents had approached the
Planning Commission regarding this Reserve Area. The
reason for this designation was lack of information re.
environmental factors like drainage, lack of information
concerning ability of city to serve the area properly
with a particular level of service depending on what type
of development the area would support.
He continued that the area should not be encouraged to
develop at the present time. However, the Planning
Commission felt the property owners should be given some
kind of a time frame. They set a three-year time frame
to recommend to the City Council to conduct a study in
that area. It is the intent to leave the area with large
open parcels so as not to encourage rapid development
in the area until this study could be done.
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1979
Page 9
PUBLIC HEARING Mikels asked--making reference to area to the west and
north of Study Area which is outside the city boundary--
General Plan would the study of area within the city boundaries in
(continuation) any way be tied to outside studies of other agencies.
Interim Land- Lam said it was hoped that this area would be included
Use Elements in the city's sphere of interest in terms of the city's
(continued) planning effort. It would take into consideration areas
outside the city since there must be a drainage pattern
and other development factors tied together.
Council told Mr. Blanton that this will take time and
that the area as a whole as agricultural in theory
needed to be maintained. In the short term, there was
no reason why any plans could not be taken to the
Planning Commission and discussed on its own merit and
recommendations made on individual basis. Hopefully,
the area will become in the future a portion of the
city by including this in the sphere of influence.
STAFF REPORTS Report of the meetings with the Alta Laguna and Alta (16)
Vista Mobile Home Park owners by Jim Robinson. Robinson
Mobile Home gave a summary stating it was felt these meetings with
Re___p~rt Alan Wilk and William Semain were productive. Wilk
had agreed to sit down with tenants to discuss their
concerns. Semain reported he had already met with tenant
representatives. Staff would be meeting with other park
owners and would report back to Council the results of
these meetings.
~n__t~equest b~ A request by the Sheriff's Deoartment for a grant to (17)
Sheriff's Dept. establish a community juvenile Crime Prevention Unit
was made by Sgt. O'Rourke. There would be no city funds
required.
Motion: Moved by Palombo, seconded by West to approve
application for grant, approve Resolution No. 79-6, and
waive the entire reading. Title and number read by
Wasserman. Motion unanimously carried.
Amendment to A recommendation was presented to amend the Omnitrans (18)
Joint Powers JPA which would enable a non-elected official to vote
Agreement-Omnitrans during the absence of the elected official when acting
as his alternate.
Motion: MOved by Mikels, seconded by Palombo to
approve the JPA amendment. Motion unanimously carried.
Vineyard Park Report by Mr. Holley. Request of baseball field (19)
Athletic Field improvements to Vineyard Pa~k. The request was for
Improvements authorization to spend $3,202.87 from Capital improve-
ment fund for Vineyard Park. It was a "share cost" for
improvement of two sports fields in Vineyard Park with
the Citrus Little League.
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Mikels to authorize
expenditure of $3,202.87 for field improvements at
Vineyard Park. Motion unanimously carried.
Community Report was made by Mr. Holley. On January 9, 1979 the (20)
Development Block Board of Supervisors adopted a three-year program for
Grant Rancho Cucamonga's HUD allocation. Total for 1979-80
would be $372,267 and for 1980-81 would be $161,433.
Coucil received and filed the report.
Contract Award- Report by Lloyd Hubbs. He stated that three bids had (21)
Signals been received with the low bid being by Steiny and
Company of $168,611. It was recommended that the contract
for traffic signals at Baseline and Archiblad and at
Foothill and San Bernardino Road be awarded to Steiny and
Company.
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Schlosser to
approve the awarding of contract to Steiny and Company
City Council Minutes
January 15, 1979
Page 10
STAFF REPORTS for the amount of $168,611 for the above mentioned
traffic signals. Motion carried as follows:
(continued)
AYES: Schlosser, Palombo, West, Frost
NOES: Mikels
FAU Pro~ect (22) Report by Mr. Hubbs. The Advisory Committee recommended
Selection to Council the approval of the following FAU Projects:
1. Baseline from Vineyard to Hellman and
Archibald to east of Ramona-resurfacing
and reconstruction $100,000 est
2. Baseline and Hellman- traffic signals 60,000 est
3. Archibald and Church - traffic signals 60,000 est
4. Haven and Amber - traffic signals 60,000 est
5. Archibald and 19th - traffic signals 60,000 est
TOTAL $ 340,000
Motion: Moved by Mikels, seconded by Schlosser to
approve the recommendation of FAU projects as listed.
Motion unanimously carried.
League of Request to send Planning Commissioners and Director
California Cities to the League of California Cities Planning Institute.
Planning Institute Item had not been budgeted.
Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to approve
sending Planning Commissioners and Director to the
Planning Commission Institute. Motion unanimously
carried .....
NEW BUSINESS 1. Sam Maestas from Project HOY addressed the Council
seeking further support from Council for the Project
JOY program. Council received the report with thanks.
No action was taken.
(23) 2. Charles Buquet asked if the name of Hermosa Street
could be changed all the way to t~ Ontario line. Staff
said this had been turned over to C-PAC and we should
have a report of suggested name changes throughout the
North Town area very soon.
3. Council asked about the aerial maps. Lam said
the city was still working on this.
ADJOURNMENT Motion: Moved by West, seconded by Palombo to adjourn
the meeting. Motion unanimously carried. Meeting
adjourned at 11:04 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beverly Authelet
Deputy City Clerk