HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/08/10 - Agenda PacketWEDNESDAY AUGUST 10, 1994 7:00 P.M.
RANCMO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. ROll Call
Chairman Barker Commissioner Melcher __
Vice Chairman McNiel Commissioner Tolstoy__
Commissioner Lumpp
II. Announcements
III. Consent Calendar
The following Consent Calendar items are expected
to be routine and non-controversial. They will be
acted on by the Commission at one time without
discussion. If anyone has concern over any item,
it should be removed for discussion.
A. VACATION OF A PORTION OF RAMONA AVENUE BETWEEN
FERON BOULEVARD AND THE A. T. & S. F. RAILROAD
AND VARIOUS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ON
THE PARCEL TO THE EAST IN CONNECTION WITH
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-04 - APN: 209-085-20.
IV. PUblic Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which
concerned individuals may voice their opinion of
the related project. Please wait to be recognized
by the Chairman and address the Commission by
stating your name and address. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for
each project. Please sign in after speaking.
B. VARIANCE 94-04 - CAMPOS - A request to reduce
the required number of parking spaces, to
reduce the required rear yard setback from 15
feet to 0 feet, and to reduce the required side
yard landscape setback from 5 feet to 0 feet in
conjunction with the development of 5 parcels
in the Specialty Commercial Designation
(Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific
Plan, located on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard between Archibald and Klusman
Avenues, APN: 208-153-08, 09, 10, 11, and
23. (Continued from July 27, 1994)
C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-12 - KAUFMAN - A
request to establish an indoor roller hockey
skating rink in a leased space of 50,000 square
feet within an existing industrial park on 13.8
acres of land in the General Industrial
District (Subarea 11) of the Industrial Area
Specific Plan, located at 11530 Sixth Street -
APN: 207-211-13.
D. FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
94-02 - OAS A request to amend the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan by adding Commercial
Recreation as a conditionally permitted use in
the Specialty Commercial District in Subareas 1
and 2.
E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT 94-02 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -
Review of a Development Agreement to re-use a
portion of the Regina Winery property for a
retail store with wine tasting, banquet
facilities, and the bottling and storage of
wine in the High Residential District (24-30
dwelling units per acre), located at 12467 Base
Line Road - APN: 227-161-24. Staff recommends
issuance of a Negative Declaration. (ITEM
WITHDRAWN)
F. VARIANCE 93-05 - OAS PARTNERSHIP - A request
to increase the sign area for the Project
Identification Monument Sign from 24 to 49
square feet; increase the sign area for the
Tenant Identification Monument Signs from 24 to
49 square feet; and increase the ~aximum number
of tenant names on the Tenant Identification
Monument Signs from three to five per face,
for Thomas Winery Plaza, located at the
northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and
Vineyard Avenues APN: 208-101-22 through
25. Related File: Amendment to Uniform Sign
Program No. 88. (Continued from July 13, 1994}
(TO BE CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 14, 1994)
V. Old Business
G. AMENDMENT TO UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 88 OAS
PARTNERSHIP - A request to amend the Sign
Program to allow a Project Identification
Monument Sign, internally illuminated Tenant
Identification Monument Signs, and various
changes to the sign criteria for Thomas Winery
Plaza, located at the northeast corner of
Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue
APN: 208-101-22 through 25. Related file:
Variance 93-05. (Continued from July 13, 1994)
(TO BE CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 14, 1994)
VI. New Business
H. AMENDMENT TO UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 119
MICHAELS STORES A request to amend the sign
criteria to allow 6-foot individual channel
letters for the tenant name and four sets of
24-inch letters for secondary signs for
Michaels, a 17,000 square foot tenant within a
62-acre commercial/retail center in the
Regional Related Commercial designation
(Subarea 4) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific
Plan, located on the south side of Foothill
Boulevard between 1-15 and Etiwanda Avenue -
APN: 229-031-33.
VII. Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public
to address the Commission. Items to be discussed
here are those which do not already appear on this
agenda.
VIII. Commission Business
I. DISCUSSION OF FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 WORK PROGRAM
IX. Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment
time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be
heard only with the consent of the Commission.
VICINITY MAP
Ii I
|:::::::::::::::i
\
.I
I
RR
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 10, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planni~ng Commission
FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
BY: Maria Perez, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: VACATION OF A PORTION OF RAMONA AVENUE BETWEEN FERON BOULEVARD AND
THE A. T. & S. F. RAILROAD AND VARIOUS DRAINAGE AND UTILITY
EASEMENTS ON THE PARCEL TO THE EAST IN CONNECTION WITH DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW 94-04 - APN: 209-085-20
BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: On May 25, 1994, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 94-40, and approved Development Review No. 94-04, for the
development of low income housing. As a condition of approval the project was
required to vacate the unused portion of Ramona Avenue from the ATSF rail road
to Feron Boulevard (see Exhibit "A"). Additionally, several public drainage
and util i.t~, easements which currently occupy the site need to be vacated (see
Exhibit "B ').
The subject street right-of-way vacation is approximately 65 feet wide and BF)O
feet long and is located south of Peron Boulevard. The dimensions and
locations of the drainage and utility easements vary as shown on Exhibit
"B". The vacation is consistent with the General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make the
finding through minute action that the street vacation and various drainage
and utility easements conform: with the General Plan. This finding will be
forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Dan dames
Senior Civil Engineer
DJ:dlw
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Ramona Vacation and Vicinity Map
Exhibit "B" - Utility Vacation
ITEM A
~ --FERON-r- - -BLVD.-
I
I
I
I
I I AR~A TO BE
I ~ VACATED
_ ',-'.3!2.;':'.~
1.00' WIDE ROAD EASEMENT
-MAIN-ST.-;
"' P'l~c>3e_.c_.,i
LocA~otq ,,,
A R R >
~ A:--T- --&~S.--F
~n 'T ~'.t.'S-'S.F. .......FTE
-SITE MAP
N
a~c~o CuCA~o~A ~ ~ ~c
I~N'GII. r,~'~.ING DI'v"IBION ~ A
(~)60' WIDE LrrlUTY EASEMENT FOR
PUBUC UTIUTIIm (~) 30' WIDE EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE PURP(~
970' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT FOr1 TO SAN BEF~ COUNTY
PUBLIC UTILITIES (~) 30'WIDE EASEMB~r FOR ~
~ INOIDIg~TAL PtJRPOSE8
CITY OF ITEM:
RANCHO CUCA1ViONGA TITLE: DR 94-04
UTILITY VACATION "J~
~Gn,~m~G D~Sm~Ex,,e,T: e
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUgUSt 10, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: VAR/ANCE 94-04 - CAMPOS - A request to reduce the required
number of parking spaces, to reduce the required rear yard
setback from 15 feet to 0 feet, and to reduce the required
side yard landscape setback from 5 feet to 0 feet in
conjunction with the development of 5 parcels in the
Specialty Commercial Designation (Subarea 3) of the
Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the north
side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Klusman
Avenues, APN: 208-153-08, 09, 10, 11, and 23- (Continued
from July 27, 1994).
BACKGROUND: On July 27, ~994, the applicant requested a two week
continuance of the application in order to determine the economic
feasibility of the house conversions and the cafe construction in light
of the potential conditions of approval. After completing this
analysis, the applicant determined that the ~,200 square foot care would
not be sufficient to make the project economically feasible. The
applicant believes that the cafe would need to be roughly 2,000 square
feet to make the project feasible.
ANALYSIS: In order to provide a cafe that meets the applicant's needs,
two options have been submitted for the Commission's consideration. The
alternatives include a 1,698 square foot care which will seat 36 patrons
and a 1,996 square foot cafe seating 40 patrons.
As noted in the staff report of July 13, 1994, the applicant is already
requesting a Variance to reduce the required number of parking spaces
for the site. With the 1,200 square foot cafe, the site will be
deficient 8 parking spaces. Increasing the cafe to 1,698 square feet
will mean a parking deficiency of 12 spaces. Likewise, an increase to
1,996 square feet will result in a shortage of ~6 parking spaces, a
reduction of 40 percent. In beth of these cases, staff believes the
parking shortage will result in insufficient parking for the site,
parking overflowing onto adjoining sites, and on-site congestion as
drivers jockey for the parking spaces that are available-
ITEM B
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
VAR 94-04 - CAMPOS
AugUSt 10, 1994
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
Variance 94-04 with the condition limiting the cafe square footage to
1,200 square feet.
BB:SM:mlg
Attachment: Exhibit "A" - Staff Report Dated July 10, ~994
Exhibit "B" - Revised Cafe Floor Plan Designs
Resolution of Approval
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: July 13, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: VAR/ANCE 94-04 - CAMPOS - A request to reduce the required number of
parking spaces, to reduce the required rear yard setback from 15 feet
to 0 feet, and to reduce the required side yard landscape setback from
5 feet to 0 feet in conjunction with the development of 5 parcels in
the Specialty Commercial Designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the north side of Foothill
Boulevard between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, APN: 208-153-08, 09,
10, 11, and 23.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning:
North Single family residential; Specialty Commercial (Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, Subarea 3)
South Fast food restaurant; Specialty Commercial (Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, Subarea 3)
East ~2Dandoned gas station; Specialty Commercial (Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, Subarea 3)
West Single family residential; Specialty Commercial (Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan, Subarea 3)
B. Site Characteristics: The site is presently developed with four single
family residences and a care. None of the structures are presently occupied.
C. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Foota~e Ratio Required Provided
Cafe 1,367 1 space/ 14 11
100 sq. ft.
Commercial 4,869 I space/ 19 18
250 sq. ft.
TOTAL 33 29
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant has submitted a Development Review application
requesting the conversion of four single family residences to commercial
uses, the demolition of an existing cafe, and the construction of a new
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
VAR 94-04 - CAMPOS
July 13, 1994
Page 2
cafe. With the processing of the application, staff has identified three
areas of the proposed plans that do not meet the Foothill Boulevard Specific
Plan and Development Code requirements. These items are:
1. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP) requires that a commercial
development maintain a 15-foot rear yard landscape setback from existing
or proposed residential uses. The proposal shows 0-foot setback because
the parking and drive aisles will extend to the rear property line.
2. The FBSP requires a 5-foot side yard landscape setback be maintained.
The applicant is proposing 0-foot setback because the drive aisle will
extend to the property line.
3. The Development Code requires 33 parking spaces be provided to meet the
demands of the conunercial uses. The applicant is proposing only 29
spaces. Staff, however, is recommending a 75-foot stacking distance
from Foothill Boulevard which will eliminate an additional 4 parking
stalls, leaving 25 stalls for the development.
In reviewing the site, staff has expressed concerns abut unique site
constraints regarding access to not only this site but the entire block.
Based on the current driveway policy, only one access point (drive approach)
will be permitted along Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Klusman
Avenues. The ultimate plan for the block would require the drive approach to
be located in line with House No. 3 (see Exhibit "C"). Staff has met with
Caltrans to review this preliminary drive location and has received favorable
comments. Because of the potentially historic nature of the homes and the
desire to retain them, staff has agreed to a drive approach location between
the cafe and House No. 1.
Because only one drive approach will be allowed to Foothill Boulevard for the
entire block, access to the other properties in the block will be obtained
from the rear of the properties. A drive aisle will be required extending
from the alley west of Archibald Avenue to Flusman Avenue (see Exhibit
"D"). This will allow the properties to develop or redevelop while
maintaining access to the public streets. The City will require offers of
dedication from the property owners as development occurs to ensure the
access is available. This being the first development/redevelopment
proposal, there have been no previous offers of dedication obtained for the
block. AS a result, the access to the parcels and to Foothill Boulevard must
be contained entirely on the subject site.
B. Landscape Setback (north property line): With the properties to the north
being residential units, the FBSp requires a 15-foot landscape setback be
maintained. The project could be designed to meet this requirement.
However, that would mean the elimination of all parking spaces for the
project. Additionally, placing the drive aisle 15 feet from the property
line would result in significant reconstruction Of the drive aisle at such
time as the northerly properties develop and the drive aisle is relocated to
straddle the property lines as ultimately planned for the block.
pLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
VAR 94-04 - CAMPOS
July 13, 1994
Page 3
Even though the entire block is designated for commercial use, the
requirement to provide a 15-foot landscape setback was intended to provide a
buffer from proposed commercial uses and existing residential dwellings. In
this case, the residences to the north of the site are located at the
northern portion of their respective parcels, adjacent to Estacia Court.
Five of the six lots abutting the site have detached garages at the southern
portion of their lots. With the closest residence approximately 35 feet from
the rear property line and garages separating the residences from the subject
site, staff believes that adequate buffering will be provided between the
uses.
C- Landscape Setback (east property line ): The FBSP also requires a 5-foot side
yard landscape setback to be provided. At the east side of the site, the
applicant is proposing to extend the drive aisle to the property line. As
previously mentioned, the ultimate plan for the block will require the
extension of the drive aisle to the alley to the east which serves businesses
along Archibald Avenue. The applicant could provide the 5-foot setback and
eliminate the Variance request · Staff believes, however, that the pavement
should remain in order to reinforce to potential buyers of the site or
adjoining sites the fact that the drive aisle will be extended in the
future. Additionally, the pavement does provide for an easier turning
movement for cars parked in the easterly stall.
D. Parkin~ Variance: The applicant is proposing 29 parking stalls for the
project. As noted in the parking calculations, 33 parking spaces are
required based on the square footage of commercial use proposed.
Additionally, staff is recommending the elimination of the four parking
stalls proposed on the west side of the cafe to provide greater vehicle
stacking area. Because of the traffic volume and speed on Foothill
Boulevard, staff is concerned that vehicles entering or exiting those stalls
will result in cars entering the site stacking onto Foothill Boulevard until
the drive aisle is clear. The requirement to provide a 75-foot on-site
stacking distance is consistent with other projects located on major
arterials ·
The Specialty Commercial designation is one of the more restrictive
commercial designations in the FBSP. The designation was intended to provide
uses that are more "specialized" as the name would indicate. The commercial
uses permitted are generally less intensive than the other commercial
designations. AS a result, the demand for parking may not be as great.
In addition to the type of uses allowed, the site layout is a contributing
factor in regulating the types of uses that might be established. The houses
proposed for conversion to commercial uses are 958, 1,065, ~, 296, and 1,550
square feet in size. The relatively small size of the buildings will provide
opportunities for small tenants and will eliminate large tenants from
considering the site. Also, being designed as residences, the conversion of
the houses to commercial uses will provide retail space that is less
efficient than spaces designed for comercial uses. If a large tenant did
wish to expand or connect the buildings, an application would have to be
reviewed.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
VAR 94-04 - CAMPOS
July 13, 1994
Page 4
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Planning Commission to approve the Variance
request, the Commission must be able to identify facts to support each of the
following findings:
1. That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified
regulation would result in practical difficulty Or unnecessary physical
hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code.
2. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply to other properties in the same district.
3. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owner of other properties
in the same district.
4. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special
privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the same
district.
5. That granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health,
safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in
the vicinity.
As outlined in the analysis section, staff believes that there are substantial
facts to support each and every finding required to be made by the Planning
Commission.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Co~mlission approve Variance
94-04 through adoption of the attached Resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad Bullet
City Planner
BB:SM/jfS
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Site Utilization Plan
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Access Plan for the Block
Resolution of Approval
MORA
ARCHITECTS
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
DATE: April 21, 1994
TO: City ofRancho Cucamonga
Planning Department
PROJECT: 9656 Foothill Boulevard
DR 93-15 CAMPOS
VARIANCE FINDINGS
Pursuant a Variance request these findings are respectfully presented for consideration by
the Planning Commission due to the following circumstances:
1. Strict interpretation and enforcement of the parking and front, rear and side setback
requirements are difficult to achieve due to the existing size, shape and location of the
existing houses which are to be rehabilitated.
2. The existing houses have been determined to have significant historical value to the
community. This extraordinary circumstance precludes these buildings from being
modified in order to comply with the requirements of parking and yard setbacks. These
conditions do not apply to other properties in the same zone.
3. An earlier design scheme presented by the owner called for the demolition of the old
houses, before their designation as of historical value. This scheme allowed the owner
with maximum economic utilization of the site according to location. It also allowed
compliance with applicable parking and yard setback requirements. The need to
preserve the houses and replace the old cafe next door presented a new design
challenge in order to accommodate handicapped requirements, minimum number of
parking stalls and the necessary widening of Foothill Blvd.
3221 20TH STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94,10
FAX (4'i5) 824~243 EL (415) 824-9602
Planning Department
DR 93-15 CAMPOS
4/21/94
Page Two
4. Given the circumstances, it seems that the granting of this Variance may not constitute
a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations on other properties in the
same zone.
5. When the houses are fully rehabilitated and the new cafe built, the entire development
will represent a real asset to this important arterial intersection. It is our belief that the
health, safety and welfare of the community and the public in general will not be
affected by the granting of this Variance.
Please note that this development will have its own turn lane for traffic entering from the
east-west direction thus allowing additional room for cars parking in front of the cafe and
also for cars entering the complex.
1220
' ':l.' s ESTACIA
0
1200 x
Om
O X troT.5
X lt92,6 X
~-///~/r ~"
O
REVIEW
,._,.
FOOTNILL BOULEVARD e
r ......
"'1
'ro'r~ ~A~
LARGE OPTION
I
RESOLUTION N0.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE
NO. 94-04, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF
PARKING SPACES FROM 33 TO 25, TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED HEAR
YARD SETBACK FROM 15 FEET TO 0 FEET, AND TO REDUCE THE
REQUIRED SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 5 FEET TO 0 FEET IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF FIVE PARCELS IN THE
SPECIALTY CO~4ERCIAL DESIGNATION ( SUBAREA 3 ) OF THE
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BETWEEN ARCHIBALD AND KLUSMAN
AVENUES, AND MA/(ING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
208-153-08, 09, 10, 11, AND 23.
A. Recitals ·
1. Ana Campos has filed an application for the issuance of Variance
No. 94-04 as described in the title of this Resolution- Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 13th day of July and continued to the 27th day Of July and
the 10th day of August 1994, the Planning Co~m~ission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing On that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Co~unission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Comnission
during the above-referenced public hearing on July 13, July 27, and August 10,
1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public
testimony, this Comission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to five parcels located on the north
side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Flusman Avenues with a
combined street frontage of 300 feet and lot depth of 130 feet which are
presently improved with four single family residences, that are potential
local historic landmarks, and an abandoned cafe; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated
for commercial uses and is developed with single family residences, the
property to the south is designated for commercial uses and is developed with
a fast food restaurant, the property to the east is designated for comercial
uses and is developed with an out-of-use, potentially historic gas station,
and the property to the west is designated for con~nercial uses and is
developed with a single family residence; and
PLANNING COF~4ISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR 94-04 - CAMPOS
August 10, 1994
Page 2
c. The applicant proposes the demolition of the existing cafe,
the construction of a new cafe, and the conversion of the existing single
family residences to commercial or Office uses for a total of 6,236 square
feet of lease space; and
d. The development of the cafe and conversion of the residences
is consistent with the Specialty Commercial designation of the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan and the Commercial designation of the General Plan;
and
e. Access to Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Klusman
Avenues will be limited to one drive approach consistent with the City's
General Plan Circulation Element and FOothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and
f. The ultimate plan to provide access to all sites within the
block bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Archibald Avenue, Klusman Avenue, and
Estacia Court, will require a 26-foot offer of dedication to be obtained
equally from the properties fronting FOothill Boulevard and the properties
fronting Estacia Court (13 feet from each property). The offer of dedication
will extend from the west side of the parcels fronting Archibald Avenue to
Klusman Avenue; and
g. Because only the five parcels fronting FOothill Boulevard are
being developed in the block at this time, a 24-foot drive aisle must be
provided entirely on the site. Upon development of other parcels in the
block, the drive aisle may be shifted to the north to straddle the property
lines; and
h. The property to the north is designated as Specialty
Commercial. However, because the properties to the north are existing
residential uses, the FOothill Boulevard Specific Plan requires a 15-fOot
landscape setback be provided; and
i. Because of the limited access to FOothill Boulevard for the
block and drive aisle requirement at the rear of the site, the requirement for
a ~5-foot landscape setback would result in the elimination of all parking
spaces for the project; and
j. The residences north of the subject site are located at the
northern portion of their respective iota separated from the proposed
commercial uses by detached garages, providing a buffer between the uses; and
k. The FOothill Boulevard Specific Plan requires a 5-foot side
yard setback be provided; however, the drive aisle will ultimately be extended
over the parcel to the east in the future to allow access to Foothill
Boulevard; and
1. In the formulation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan,
the City recognized the potential historic and cultural value of the
residences provided within the block. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
encourages the retention of historic and cultural resources where possible;
and
pLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
VAR 94-04 - CAMPOS
AUgUSt 10, 1994
Page 3
m. The City has identified the area bounded by Foothill
Boulevard, Archibald Avenue, Klusman Avenue, and Estacia Court as a potential
historic Overlay district in order to retain the historic and cultural
significance of the area; and
n. The application as proposed requires 33 parking spaces;
whereas, the site plans indicate 29 spaces are being provided. Staff has
recommended the elimination of 5 spaces to provide adequate vehicle stacking
for cars entering or exiting from Foothill Boulevard, a major arterial street
with current traffic volume of over 35,000 daily two-way trips and projected
traffic volume of over 40,000 daily two-way trips. Therefore, the total
number of parking spaces available for the proposed development would be
25 spaces; and
o. The applicant contemplates conversion of several small
residences to commercial/office uses. The relatively small size of these
structures will be suitable for specialty commercial or small office users
which have lower parking demand than the typical shopping center or office
complex.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the
specified regUlations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary
physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code.
b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the
property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district.
c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the
specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the
owners of other properties in the same district.
d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant
of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties
classified in the same district.
e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Pursuant to the State CEQA Guidelines, it has been determined
that the proposed project does not have the potential for causing a
significant effect on the environment. The project has been determined to be
exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). The Planning Commission,
having .final approval over this project, has reviewed and considered this
exemption prior to the approval of this project.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0.
VAR 94-04 - CAMPOS
AuguSt 10, 1994
Page 4
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in
paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the
application subject to the following condition:
a) The cafe size shall be limited to 1,200 square
feet.
6. The Secretary to this Cor~nission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Vice Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City Of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of August 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
O'Donnell
Property
Services, Inc;
August 8, 1994 ,~LANN~NG DIVISION
Planning Depa~ment
CI~ OF ~NCHO CUCAMONGA
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
RE: Conditional Use Permit 94-12 - Kaufman
Dear Ms. Lu~rell:
I was recently made aware of the upcoming public hearing on the referenid subje~ and
wanted to present some concerns of an adjacent propeRy owner. I will be unable to a~end
the scheduled hearing. but wanted to make our concerns known.
The O'Donnell Group, under various development pa~nerships, has developed in excess of
Mo and one-half million square feet of quality projects since 1979 in Rancho Cucamonga.
We have retained ownership of some of it, and have retained the prope~y management of the
majority of what we developed. We are proud of our development~ and our propeRy
management eftoRs are rewarded by a high level of occupancy and satisfied institutional
owners.
Since the inception of the Industrial Specific Plan and the resulting development in the
industrial areas of the Ci~, we have experienced relatively few incidents of theft or vandalism.
The rate of gra~ti incidents in our projects is low and we hope that so~ of senseless
vandalism, which is expensive to remove, can be kept to a minimum.
One project which we continue to own is located at the southeast corner of Sigh Street and
Buffalo, and runs eastedy to Charles Smith Road (formerly Rochester), and southerly to San
Marino Street. The close proximi~ to the proposed indoor roller skating rink causes us some
concern because the operator will be introducing a youthful element to an area which has not
historically had any reason to draw any type of night-time or after hours population of either
youth or adults.
As owners and managers, we see a new set of problems being brought to the industrial
area -- parking. vandalism, tra~c through our projects, potentially increased gra~ti, and
probably some things we have not yet experienced.
We would urge you to consider that the operator be responsible for providing on-site security
for his operation, and that the local police patrols be increased in the industrial area
2201 Dupont Drive. Suite 100 · Irvine. CA 92715 · (714) 851-0t 11 · FAX (714) 851-1826
P.O. Box 19583 · Irvme. CA 92713 9583
Irwne · Sama Rosa · San Jose · Ontano · San[a Fe Spr=ngs · San Q~ego · Sacramento · Las Vegas
Ms. Beverly Luttrell
Planning Department
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
August 8, 1994
Page 2
immediately surrounding the subject property. We don't deny the operator his right to pursue
private enterprise, but we would appreciate the City of Rancho Cucamonga exercising caution
in granting an approval without considering the impact to the existing property owners and
business operators in the affected area. As this use is not considered a normal part of an
industrial area, it does impact the area in ways differently than if it were being proposed for an
established retail area or residential neighborhood. We hope that you, the staff, and the
Planning Commission take that into your consideration.
Please feel free to call me to discuss this issue further if necessary. Thank you for your
assistance.
THE O'DONNELL GROUP
Partner
cc: John O'Donnell (w/encl.)
Don Grant (w/encl.)
Joe Oltmans (w/encl.)
JRW:mjd\cup-rc. ltr
TEL: Rug 09,94 t5:07 No.O03 P.OZ
DONALD::[JI[2~LAN : .....
.... '~:~9 ' "' "'''
"' ': ' L~ " , ' '-%" :-- :'-
_; ' 7' '. ' -' ' ' ' '-d "- ' ............
' ;:""'x7'7";':;' " ' - ., '." -,t:'.'/.:';:L~:%
. ::,:~-~:.;..~: ......... -.. ............ _
. .,,,. ......... ::? ......
· .~':"~?::~ .~'-.-.:'-'. , :. . ::~ . 7.' ....
~ 'F'~."
· ~'.' , ......
.. .... .-. . .~. %-:~ ....
~ ......... , -- ~::.- ~-~ ..... .,-
:" :'d' ' ' 'L.L. - .'· . . 'L "" ..:'~ ~ %%;:. '- · '
. . .-..: . ... :%= ':'~::?- '. · : .': ...:..:.. L.
"· my concerns regard4n'g ~W~"~'9i p~f~rBnc~d Us~ Pebm4~T4t~'n
~... under err'If'gent cond~hi ~":~'~th stlpu~atlons regarding hi .... : '
' , . .' ;~ ' ":4 ;~' ' " ".
. :,. ,:_'..ppopart~e~ b~caule of ~y'.i~'.m~ negghbors conclrn for :.""
· ..~..., ,.~.: ... _ .
.,........ ...... _ .......
: - -.~ .:,..-.:.~::-t:~ .......
. . · .:~.~:::~,~...~-~?.. . '. :,..;.
. . .,~ ....
' '-' :: ..'. - ....'.'.t~ '~ :: '
..... :-..;:.$~ -' . ..- .
........ ~ ......................,:~, .f~:· - . ' '-:-.: .' ." ~::-i:f' '~;~
"' .."'- . ...,..~ ~ C : --:"
q~:: · ~--,-..~..:.:.-.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUgUSt 10, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Con~nission
FROM: Brad Bullet, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, principal Planner
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE pERMIT 94-12 - KAUFMAN - A reqUest to establish an
indoor roller hockey skating rink in a leased space of 50,000
sqUare feet within an existing industrial park on 13.8 acres of
land in the General Industrial District (Subarea 11) of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, located at 11530 Sixth Street
APN: 207-211-13.
pROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Site Characteristics: The site is fully developed with several medium and
large industrial warehouse buildings.
B. Parking Calculations:
Number of Number of
Type Square parking Spaces Spaces
Of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided
Soccer Facility 23,032 * 261 311
(Commercial Recreation)
· For discussion of parking ratio used, see Analysis below.
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The proposed use is roller blade hockey on two indoor skating
rinks. Additional amenities include locker rooms, children's arcade,
retail pro shop, restrooms, offices, and seating for up to 300 spectators
(see Exhibit "D"). The facility is intended to accommodate youth and
adult roller hockey leagUes, recreational skating, and competitive figUre
skating programs. The applicant proposes to utilize 50,000 square feet of
the 103,552 square foot building which formerly housed the Carnival Mall.
The proposed hours of operation will be Monday through Friday from
10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. and Saturday and Sunday from 6:00 a.m. to
2:00 a.m. The applicant expects peak traffic to be weekends and after
6:00 p.m. weekdays. In addition to leagUe play and figUre skating events,
the applicant intends to teach skating and hockey and offer open skating
to the general public, as well as accommodate birthday parties, coffee
clubs, and "Mommy and Me" skating sessions- There will be six full time
staff on hand at any given time. A detailed description of the business
is contained in Exhibit "A".
ITEM C
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 94-12 - KAUFMAN
AUguSt 10, 1994
Page 2
B. Site Suitability: The primary consideration in reviewing this Conditional
Use Permit is suitability of the project site for the intended co~nercial
recreation use and compatibility with surrounding uses. The site is part
of a larger complex with four buildings that were designed for research
and development, office, and industrial. The four buildings share parking
and access. The westerly building is Occupied by two warehouse
distribution tenants, and the southerly office building is vacant. The
applicant has leased the entirety of the largest building: a warehouse
distribution building totaling 103,552 square feet. The balance of the
building will be subleased as "dead storage" space to minimize parking
demand. The site is located on 6th Street, a major divided arterial
street, with projected traffic volumes in excess of 13,000 daily two-way
trips. The proposed site plan, parking layout, access, and building
configuration are suitable for the intended use.
C. qompatibilit~: The proposed hours of operation are primarily on weekends
and evenings which represents an offset of peak demand from the normal
business hours expected within an industrial complex of this nature. With
the most intense use (i.e., league play and special skating events)
occurring in the evenings and on weekends, no conflicts are anticipated
between the proposed use and surrounding uses.
D. Parking: The Development Code parking requirement for skating rinks is
one space per 100 square feet of gross floor area, plus the spaces
required for additional uses on the site. However, staff believes that
the code requirement does not adequately address the unique operating
characteristics as described by the applicant, in particular the potential
for up to 300 spectators. Studies of similar facilities, which are on
file in the Planning Division, can be used to determine the parking demand
of the proposed business. These studies show that total parking demand
will be the sum of three components. The normal demand is one space per
376 square feet of gross floor area. For spectator events, such as a
competitive hockey playoffs or figure skating events, it can be
anticipated that one space per 3.15 spectators will be needed, plus the
parking requirement for staff and performers will be 35 percent of the
spectator demand. Peak parking demand will consist of the following:
Roller Rinks = 133 spaces (50,000 sq. ft. @ 1/376 sq. ft.)
Spectators = 95 spaces (300 spectators @ 1/3.15 spectators)
Staff & Performers = 33 spaces (95 spaces @ 35%)
TOTAL 261 spaces
There are 311 parking spaces available to the applicant which would
provide a 10 percent contingency for unexpected fluctuations and parking
turnover. Also, under the terms of the applicant's lease, an additional
250 spaces are available in the evenings and on weekends. There is a
total of 875 parking spaces throughout the complex (see Exhibit "C").
PLANNING COF~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 94-12 - KAUFMAN
AUguSt 10, ~994
Page 3
E. Technical Review: The project was reviewed by the Building and Safety
Division and Fire Safety Division. Many of the code requirements are in
place from the tenant improvements constructed by Carnival Mall. The
Building and Safety Division indicated that the application may result in
a change of occupancy to A-3 or A-4 (from the currently approved occupancy
Of B-2) pending submittal of plans for review. The Fire Safety Division
indicated that sprinklers will be required as well as certification of
flame retardant treatment for flammable decorations and interior finish.
Additional exit illumination with back up power supply may be required.
Appropriate conditions of approval have been included in the Resolution.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit 94-12
through adoption of the attached Resolution.
Bra
Ci{ Planner
BB:DC:Sp
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Location Map
Exhibit "C" - Site Plan
Exhibit "D" - Floor Plan
Resolution of Approval
PLANNING DIVISION
June 2, 1994
.r. Dan Coleman
Principal Planner
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Dear Mr. Coleman:
Concerning Conditional Use Permit 94-12, we submit the following:
Proposal
Recreation 2000 Inc. proposes to install two roller skating rinks
(dimensions 190' X 90' and 150' X 55') with finished locker room
facilities to support youth and adult roller hockey leagues as well
as extensive skating programs designed for the recreational skater
up to the most advanced levels of competitive figure skating in the
Inland Empire area. Included in this facility will be a 300 sq.
ft. children's arcade, a 1500 sq. ft. pro shop stocked with the
latest in roller skating, in-line skating, and ice hockey apparel
and equipment, spacious rest rooms, 300 sq. ft. of administrative
offices, and spectator seating. This plan proposes to utilize
approximately 50,000 sq. ft. of the 103,552 sq. ft. building
located at 11530 Sixth Street in Rancho Cucamonga. The remaining
53,552 sq. ft. will be leased out as storage space. The hours of
operation will be Monday thru Friday from 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 A.M.
and Saturday and Sunday from 6:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. Peak traffic
will be after 6:00 P.M. weekdays and all day Saturday and Sunday
(please see attached schedule).
Activities
Activities will include several levels of both youth and adult
roller hockey leagues, youth and adult open (pick-up) hockey games,
youth and adult hockey schools geared to improve all aspects of the
player's game, learn-to-skate programs, private skating lessons,
skating classes, general public skating sessions, Mommy and Me
skating sessions, Coffee Club, and birthday pal'ties.
Parking
1. Roller Hockey is played with five (5) players on each side.
2. An average team will have twelve (12) registered players.
3. There will be two (2) indoor rinks.
4, Two (2) teams play on each rink every hour.
5. Total of four (4) teams will be playing at any given time.
6. This yields forty-eight (48) players every hour.
8300 UTICA AVE. SUITE 191 "ANC"O
7. Peak traffic will be after 6:00 P.M. Monday thru Friday and
all day Saturday and Sunday.
Fifty (50%) percent of players are below the age of 16.
9. Parents will drive younger players to the facility.
10. For every two (2) youth participants, one (1) car is needed.
11. For every adult participant, one (1) car is needed.
12. For forty-eight I48) players, thirty-six (36) cars are needed
(twenty-four (24) for adults and twelve (12) for youths).
13. There will be an overlap of players in the center.
14. For the forty-eight (48) additional players present during
overlap periods, an additional thirty-six (36) spaces are
needed.
15. This concludes that at any given time seventy-two (72)
parking spaces are required for player traffic.
16. For each player, one (1) additional car will be present to
accommodate spectators (total 48 additional spaces).
17. There will be six (6) full-time staff on hand at any given
time.
18. Therefore, (72 players + 48 spectators + 6 staff =) 126
parking spaces required.
19. Add twenty (20%) contingency for parking, this equals an
additional 26 spaces.
20. Total parking requirement will be 152 spaces (126 + 26).
21. The center has 350 spaces available.
22. With the reciprocal parking agreement, an additional 250
spaces will be available Monday thru Friday from 6:00 P.M. to
6:00 A.M. and all day Saturday and Sunday. This brings the
total number of parking spaces available to 600.
Parking demand for regular activities (10:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M.).
may be analyzed as follows (given that youth hockey practice will
command the highest amount of traffic):
*Assuming that for youth practices twenty-four (24) participants
will be present each hour (two (2) teams @ twelve (12) players per
team), and each participant requires one (1) vehicle, this creates
a demand for forty-eight (48) spaces. With the overlap of players
in the center, an additional forty-eight (48) spaces will be
required. This brings the total number of required parking spaces
to ninety-six (96). Add six (6) spaces for the number of staff and
bring the total to one hundred two (102) spaces.
Parking demand for special events may be substantially greater than
demand for regular activities. The main variable influencing
parking demand for special events is the number of spectators.
With proposed seating not to exceed 300, and special events
scheduled on Fridays, Saturdays, and Sundays only, we have
concluded the following:
*Assuming that 152 parking spaces are requlr~d at any given time
(this allows for participants, average number of spectators, and
staff-See number 2d) and during special events a maximum number of
300 additional spectators will be present (using the formula of
3.15 spectators per vehicle), this will increase the number of
parking spaces required by 95. The total now becomes 247 spaces.
Again, with the reciprocal parking agreement, 609 spaces are
available. In conclusion, we feel that based on ou~ studies and
the total number of parking spaces, more than adequate parking is
available for the amount of traffic this facility would generate.
Recreation 2000 Inc's goal is to install only the best facilities;
using all of the latest technologies. This project is being
designed as a general use facility for the communities of the
Inland Empire to enjoy. Should you have any questions concerning
our studies or proposal, please feel free to contact us at any
time.
Sincerely,
RECREATION 2000 INC.
David Mathews
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
RECREATION Z~00 INC.
Mondays:
10:00-11:00 Coffee Club
11:00-12:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
12:00-1:00 Public Skating (Skating
1:00- 2:00 " Lessons)
2:00- 3:00 "
3:00- 4:00 Youth Hockey Practice
4:00- 5:00
5:00- 6:00 "
6:00- 7:00
7:00- 8:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
8:00- 9:00 "
9:00-10:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey II
10:00-11:00 "
11:00-12:00 Private Rink Rental
12:00-1:00
Tuesdays:
10:00-11:00 Coffee Club
11:00-12:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
12:00-1:00 Public Skating Skating
1:00- 2:00 " Lessons)
2:00- 3:00 "
3:00- 4:00 Youth Hockey Practice
4:00- 5:00 "
5:00- 6:00 "
6:00- 7:00 Youth Pick-up Hockey
7:00- 8:00 Hockey School
8:00- 9:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
9:00-10:00 "
10:00-11:00 Private Rink Rental
11:00-12:00 "
WEDNESDAYS:
10:00-11:00 Coffee Club
11:00-12:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
12:00-1:00 Public Skating (Skating
1:00- 2:00 " Lessons)
2:00- 3:00 "
3:00- 4:00 Youth Hockey Practice
4:00- 5:00 "
5:00- 6:00
6:00- 7:00 ,,
7:00- 8:00 Adult Hockey Leagues
8:00- 9:00 "
9:00-10:00 "
10:00-11:00 "
11:00-12:00 "
12:00-1:00 Private Rink Rental
THURSDAYS:
10:00-11:00 Coffee Club
11:00-12:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
12:00-1:00 Public Skating (Skating
1:00- 2:00 " Lessons)
2:00- 3:00 ,,
3:00- 4:00 Youth Hockey Practice
4:00- 5:00
5:00- 6:00 ,,
6:00- 7:00 Youth Pick-up Hockey
7:00- 8:00 Hockey School
8:00- 9:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
9:00-10:00 ,,
10:00-11:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey II
11:00-12:00 ,,
12:00-1:00 Private Rink Rental
FRIDAYS:
10:00-11:00 Coffee Club
11:00-12:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
12:00-1:00 Public Skating (Skating
1:00- 2:00 " Lessons)
2:00- 3:00 ',
3:00- 4:00 Youth Hockey Practice
4:00- 5:00 ,,
5:00- 6:00 ,,
6:00- 7:00 ,,
7:00- 8:00 -
8:00- 9:00 ,,
9:00-10:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
10:00-11:00 ,,
11:00-12:00 Private Rink Rental
12:00-1:00 ,,
SATURDAYS:
6:00- 7:00 Youth Hockey Games
7:00- 8:00 "
8:00- 9:00
9:00-10:00
10:00-11:00 "
11:00-12:00 "
12:00- 1:00
1:00- 2:00 "
2:00- 3:00 Adult Pick-up Hockey
3:00- 4:00 "
4:00- 5:00 Youth Hockey Games
5:00- 6:00 "
6:00- 7:00 Adult Hockey Games
7:00- 8:00 "
8:00- 9:00
9:00-10:00 "
10:00-11:00 "
11:00-12:00 "
12:00-1;00 Private Rink Rental
1:00- 2:00 "
SUNDAYS:
6:00- 7:00 Private Rink Rental
7:00- 8:00 "
8:00- 9:00 Adult Hockey Games
9:00-10:00 "
10:00-11:00 "
Youth. Hockey Games
2:00- 3:00 "
3:00- 4:00 "
4:00- 5:00 "
5:00- 6:00 "
6:00- 7:00 "
7:00- 8:00 "
8:00- 9:00 Adult Hockey Games
9:00-10:00 "
i88: !88 Private Ri.k Rental
12:00-1:00 "
1:00- 2:00 "
Por. 3 "e'd) Par. 2 Por. I
6.796 AC. .,
15.98 ~.C ,.. ~ 2.~-,
4
I.~ 5AC ~ 1.61OAC
18.8~ AC
\
. 7
~ Par. I
Z',' 4 / Par. t
5,41AC, I
P.~r. 7 " >_,049~C.
. PQr. I Par. 25
Par, 6 L~'~' ~.2Z2 AC.
'P~. ~ ~ @ ® 44 ~.,~. ~ ®
1.057 AC. '
"4n. "fi ~) -- Par.
~ e Pot. 9 · 1.979AC. 2.021~.
Par. 4 8.53A0.
e ~f ~.~' · .LB~tgAC ~, .
Pot, 5
· 2.3~TAC.
150
3.595/C. I "'
~4~' ,, I 2.167 AG,~,' Per. 15
.t4~..~,¢ 1.7~c) AC. '.798 AC.
VACANT ~ VACANT
REGAL LIGHT
RATTAN ,°~ CONCERN
:~t~:J-;-~LIIIII[~J
Q--\\ EXHIBIT "C"
LEGEND
1. Lobby/Entry
2. Junior Rink (155' x 55')
3. Main Rink (185' x 85')
4. Arcade
5. Concessions
6. Restroom
7. Restroom
8. LOcker Room
9. Pro-Shop
10. Administrative Offices
EXHIBIT "D"
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 94-12 FOR AN INDOOR ROLLER RINK FACILITY,
LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 11)
OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 207-211-13.
A. Recitals.
t. Bill Kaufman has filed an application for the issuance of
Conditional Use Permit No. 94-12 as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use
Permit request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of August 1994, the Planning Commission of the
City Of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Coramission of the City of Rancho cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on August 10, 1994, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at 11530
6th Street which is presently improved with 203,057 square feet of industrial
buildings and 875 parking spaces, of which 311 spaces are available to the
applicant, plus an additional 250 spaces in the evenings and on weekends; and
b. The property to the north of the subject site is industrial,
the property to the south consists of industrial, the property to the east is
industrial, and the property to the west is industrial; and
c. The application contemplates an indoor roller skating
facility including two rinks, locker rooms, pro-shop, arcade, and concessions;
and
d. The proposed hours of Operation are Mondays through Fridays
10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. and on weekends from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 94-12 - KAUFMAN
August 10, 1994
Page 2
e. The proposed use is roller hockey, including league play for
youth and adults; roller skating; skating instruction; and special skating
events such as competitive figure skating.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan,
the objectives of the Development code, and the purposes of the district in
which the site is located.
b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions
applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare Or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and Industrial Area Specific Plan.
4. This commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below:
Plann~
1) Approval shall expire, unless extended by the
Planning Commission, if building permits are not
issued or the approved use has not commenced
within 24 months from the date of approval.
2) Approval of this request shall not waive
compliance with all sections of the Industrial
Area Specific Plan and all other City
Ordinances.
3) If the operation of the facility causes adverse
effects upon adjacent businesses or operations,
including but not limited to parking, the
Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before
the Planning Commission for the consideration
and possible termination of the use.
4) Any signs proposed for the facility shall be
designed in conformance with the Uniform Sign
Program for the complex.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 94-12 - KAUFMAN
August 10, 1994
Page 3
5) Prior to any use of the project site or business
activity being commenced thereon, all conditions
of approval shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the City Planner.
6 ) Approval is for a 50,000 square foot indoor
roller hockey skating rink facility with
incidental services such as food concessions and
a pro-shop. The expansion Or the
intensification of the use, or a change in the
hours of operation, shall require a modification
to the Conditional Use Permit.
7 ) The game arcade shall only be open to rink
customers and shall not be open to the general
public.
8) Adequate interior clear space shall be provided
for safe and convenient patron circulation and
shall meet the following minimum standards:
a) Amusement devices shall be located no closer
than 12 inches from any wall assembly
separating the arcade from any adjacent
building or portion of a building.
b) Provide a minimum of 60 inches between
amusement devices and any entrance or exit.
c ) Where amusement devices are located along
one side of an aisle, provide a minimum
unobstructed aisle width of 66 inches.
Where amusement devices are located along
both sides of any aisle, provide a minimum
unobstructed aisle width of 90 inches.
d) Additional interior clear space may be
required by the Building Official, the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire District, or the
Rancho Cucamonga Police Department in order
to maintain public safety.
9) No amusement device shall be used for purposes
of or in connection with ga/nbling. The winning
of anything of value shall constitute gambling,
except the winning of a prize in a scheduled
tournament.
10) Special events for large groups of spectators,
such as league playoffs and competitive figure
skating events, shall be limited to Fridays,
Saturdays, and Sundays.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 94-12 - KAUFMAN
August 10, 1994
Page 4
11) The hours of operation shall be limited to
weekdays from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. and on
weekends from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.
12) A maximum of 300 spectator seats may be
provided.
Fire District/Buildinq and Safety Division
1) Occupancy of the facility shall not commence
until such time as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshal's regulations have been
complied with. Detailed plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire
Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division for review and approval prior to
issuance of building permits. The building
shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
2) Any modification to the approved plans after
occupancy of the building may require additional
review and/or permits from the Fire District and
the Building and Safety Division.
3) The building will be required to have an
automatic fire protection system (sprinklers).
4) Proper certification of flame retardant
treatment of the interior finish and decorations
is required.
5) Additional exit illumination with back-up power
may apply after plans are approved and upon
final Fire Department inspection.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Larry T. McNiel, Vice Chairman
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 94-12 - KAUFMAN
AuguSt 10, 1994
Page 5
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 27th day of April 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUgUSt 10, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Com~aission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - 0AS - A request
to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan by adding Commercial
Recreation as a conditionally permitted use in the Specialty
Commercial District in Subareas 1 and 2-
BACKGROUND: At it's meeting On June 22, 1994, after considering the
applicant's request to add the Commercial Recreation Use to the Specialty
Commercial District, the Conwaission directed the applicant to proceed with the
amendment application. Attached to this report is a copy of the minutes from
June 22, 1994.
ANALYSIS:
A. Proposed Amendment: The primary consideration is whether the Commercial
Recreation land use category is appropriate for the Specialty Con~nercial
District. The Development Code defines Commercial Recreation as "a use
providing recreation, amusement, or entertainment services, including
indoor, such as theaters, bowling lanes, billiard parlors, skating arenas,
and similar services, and outdoor uses such as golf, tennis, basketball,
baseball, and similar services, operated on a private or for profit basis"
(Sec. 17.02.140). However, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan
identifies Theaters as a distinct land Use category separate from
Commercial Recreation.
Page II-6.2 (see Exhibit "C") of the Specific Plan states that Specialty
Commercial is intended to accommodate specialty uses unique to a
particular subarea. The applicant desires to open a billiards and sports
club within the Thomas Winery Plaza (see Exhibit "B"). Staff believes
that the concept of allowing a mix of commercial and indoor recreation
uses has merit. Adding this land use category to the Specialty Commercial
district would allow the opportunity to create such a unique center,
furthering the intent of the land use district.
A review of the Specific Plan shows that Subareas ~, 2, and 3, as shown in
Exhibit "D," have locations designated for Specialty Commercial
Districts. Based on recent code amendments to streamline the planning
process, Indoor Commercial Recreation is now a permitted use in Subarea
3. Therefore, staff recommends adding Indoor Commercial Recreation as a
Permitted use in Subareas 1 and 2.
ITEM D
PLANNING COF~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
FBSPA 94-02 - OAS INVESTORS
August 10, 1994
Page 2
B. Environmental Assessment: The proposed amendment of adding Commercial
Recreation land use to the Specific Plan is not subject to environmental
assessment as staff determined that it is not a "project" since the action
will not result in a physical change in the environment directly or
ultimately. Refer to Publlc Resources Code Section 21065 (CEQA Section
15378). However, a project level environmental review would be required
for development of vacant land to a commercial recreation use.
FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land
Use Policies of the General Plan. It promotes the goals and objectives of the
Land Use Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The proposed
amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent
properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the
surrounding properties.
CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the
Inland Valley Dail~ Bulletin newspaper and notices were mailed to all property
owners within Subareas 1 and 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the
attached Resolution recommending approval of FOOthill Boulevard Specific Plan
Amendment 94-02 to the City Council.
BB:NF/jfs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Minutes dated June 22, 1994
Exhibit "B" - Applicant's Letter dated May 16, ~994
Exhibit "C" - Specialty Commercial District Description
Exhibit "D" - Subareas 1, 2, and 3
Exhibit "E" - Excerpt from Su~m~ary Of Land Use Table and Land
Use Matrix of Subareas 1 and 2
Resolution Recommending Approval
Draft City Council Resolution
ARES: COMM~SSrONERS:
BARKER LUMPP MCNIEL h~ER T
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, MELC~y~R~-
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NO~.~-/!' -carried
Commissioner MelG~~ed that he was voting against the design, not
against hav~B~'~'~reeway sign.
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
K. OAS INVESTORS - A request to consider adding Commercial Recreation Use in
the specialty Commercial District within the Foothill Boulevard specific
Plan.
Brjd Buller, City Planner, presented the staff report.
Chairman Barker invited public comment.
William Walls, 941 Clear Creek Canyon Drive, Diamond Bar, said he planned to
open an upscale billiard and sports viewing club with a sit-down pizza
restaurant. He said he had obtained support from the Small Business
Administration, OAS Investors, and the other tenants in the center.
Commissioner Tolstoy asked the definition of upscale.
Mr. Walls replied that it is a plush type club catering to strictly adults and
they would be checking ID's of those going into the billlard portion Of the
club. He said he was trying to cater to white collar type individuals.
There were no additional public comments.
Commissioner Melcher suggested that the Commission should act with their eyes
wide open. He reported the owners of the Book Cellar had told him they
relocated to a shopping center at Hellman and Foothill because a billiard club
had gone in at their previous center. He felt that the operation of this
proposed billiard club may be adjusted to suit a different clientele than what
was proposed because the main Objective would obviously be to make money. He
thought the use could be successful but felt the Commission should be alert to
what has happened elsewhere. He favored moving forward with the amendment to
add Commercial Recreation to the Speciality Commercial District, but he felt
such a use may have to be regulated under the conditional use permit
application. He thought this particular location may be far enough from the
other elements of the shopping eenter so that it should work.
Commissioner Tolstoy noted the applicant was asking for a specific place, and
he agreed that may be a good location for that type of business. However, he
noted that the amendment would allow the use in other places in the City and
those locations may not be sufficiently far enough away from residential
areas.
Planning Commission Minutes -19- June 22, 1994
Commissioner McNiel supported the concept. He noted that the billiard club
adjacent to the theatres in Upland caters to a younger group and sometimes
causes problems for theatre patrons. He thought this use would be similar to
the club which had recently been approved for the Masi Center.
Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by McNiel, to direct to the applicant to
apply for a Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan amendment to add Commercial
Recreation as a conditional use in the Speciality Commercial District. Motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE -carried
m ring. ' .....
work of the Sign~ k Force and the various options available to the
· ' praised t~ Sign Task Force's participation and their
effTrts. He expressed his opih~ that every time the Sign Ordinance has been
reviewed it has been weakened; ~c~ever, he felt that most of what the Sign
Task Force had discussed was acceptable.
Chairman Barker suggested the Commissia~ discuss the items individually and
reach consensus before moving on ~o the nek. type of signs.
Grand O enin Sins:
Commissioner Melcher felt such signs should be requi~.d to include the opening
date for the business.
Paula Dempsey, Chamber of Commerce and Lewis Homes Management Corporation,
indicated that tenants commonly request a "Coming Soon" ban~.
There was a general consensus that the proposed changes we~ acceptable
without a specific opening date display requirement.
Temporary Advertisinq Siqns: ~o~s
Ms. Dempsey felt the proposed changes were positive because business
would have greater flexibility. She indicated that the changes are consistent
with what her tenants typically ask for.
Planning Commission Minutes -20- June 22, 1994
O A S Investors
2724 I La Paz Road
ichard J. O'Nei][ Suile 125
Laguna Niguel. CA 92656
Howard Adler ~ 1~ E C [ I ~f I~ D --
HOrO~ilZ Trust CIT~ 0F ~I~H0 GU~I~0N6A Phone: ~714~ 831-5158
P~ANNING DIVISI~ Fax: (714~ 831-4288
May 16, 1994 ~ MAY I 91~ ~
MS. Nancy Fong f~Ji~
Planning Depa~ment
CiW of Rancho Cucamonga 4
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Re: Amendment to the Foothill Specific Plan, Sub Area Two designated SC
for Thomas Wine~ Center at ~e NE corner of Foothill BIrd. at Vineyard
to permit a CUP process for a billiard & sports club featuring a full dining
pizza restaurant called Cue and View, and a Non-Construction
Conditional Use Permit for ~e building previously occupied by Gemmel's
pharmacy and outlined in green on ~e a~ached site plan to
accommodate Cues and Views Billlard Club.
Dear Ms. Fong:
Please consider this le~er as fulfillment of Item 2 of the filing requirements for
the above referenced specific plan amendment.
Our justifications for requesting this amendment include:
1) With the CiW Council's approval of our recent request to amend the
Foothill Specific Plan to permit the Cardio Fit Center, Thomas Wine~
Plaza is being reoriented to a specialW center emphasizing fitness,
ent~ainment, and hod. ~e proposed billlard club fits nicely into this
specialW center theme.
2)Pertaining this amendment continues the specialW center designation
and allows Thomas Wjne~ to truly become a theme specialW center.
3) Despite an aggressive leasing campaign it has been almost impossible to
find suitable tenants under the SC designation as wri~en back in the late
80's. The retail environment has changed dramatically since the ~othill
Specific Plan was wri~en. Permiffing this use, under the CUP process,
in the SC designation will greatly assist in recognizing the new retail
realities. ~e owner of ~oms Wine~ Plaza has consistently waged
the most competitive leasing campaign in the area, while maintaining the
highest standards br the Center, despite huge vacancies. The entire
FoothillNineyard areas has been in an unprecedented recession. We
need the CiW's full suppo~ and cooperation to make the Center and the ~( ~
Ms. Nancy Fong
May 16,1994
Page Two
4) The operator and owner of the billlard club, Mr. William Walls, has given
considerable thought to every aspect of what will be an upscale, high
end operation, compatible with the other tenants at the Thomas Winery
Plaza. He has prepared a thoroughly researched business plan that won
the support and financing of the Small Business Administration. Similar
high end billlard clubs have opened in Newport Beach and Irvine.
5) The billlard club has the full support of all the Tenants at Thomas
Winery. The owners of Cardio Fit and the new Frontier Steak House are
particularly enthusiastic since they, as do the owners, find this use
especially compatible with the new direction of the Center, and their
uses in particular.
6) Upscale billlard clubs have emerged as one of the 'hottest" retail uses
in the industry, and are actively sought out by owners of shopping
centers. They attract as many, if not more women as men. Billiards has
become an entertainment of choice for many upscale women and men.
The environment has to be decorous, upscale, safe, and inviting, and as
comfortable as the best restaurants, although only light refreshments are
served. Mr. Walls has provided amply to insure only the best for his
club, and it will be on a par with those opening in affluent, upscale
communities like Rancho Cucamonga.
7) After careful review, we believe the peak hours of operation for the club
are entirely compatible with Cardio Fit, and the other retail uses in the
upper portion of Thomas Winery. The billlard club's peak hours are in
the later evening after Cardio Fit is closed, therefore creating dual use of
parl~ng. We see no problems with parking due to the difference in peak
hour operations between these uses.
8) We firmly believe that the billlard club will greatly assist in the
revitalization of Thomas Winery as a specialty center, and enhance and
facilitate the economic re-emergence of the Foothill/Vineyard sub area.
9) A great deal of thought and attention has been given to safety and
security, although that has not been a problem at other upscal~clubs,
and we do not anticipate that this club will cause any difficulties. On
the contrary, the plans for security will substantially help the Winery
development which has had serious vandalism and graffiti problems due
to the high level of vacancy.
Ms. Nancy Wong
May 16, 1994
Page Three
10) Without the ability to lease to the billlard club, we see no future tenant
available to fit into the theme of Thomas Winery. In fact, if we are
unable to proceed ahead with the billlard club, we face the prospect of
a very long vacancy in the former Gemmel's space causing serious
financial hardship, as well as a serious setback in our ability to revitalize
the Thomas Winery as a theme specialty center. Because the former
Gemmel's space is the second largest in the Center with a considerable
window onto Vineyard, a prolonged vacancy will be disastrous not only
for Thomas Winery, but to the adjacent area as well.
We are preparing the additional documents, maps, and adjacent owner labels required
for the balance of the application, and will file these materials no later than the end
of this month along with the fees for the amendment and CUP.
Please do not hesitate to contact me should you require any further information or
explanations for our justifications. Please advise us of the time schedule and other
pertinent requirements that we have to address.
Mr. Walls and I, and any of our consultants are available to discuss, in person, any
matter related to this application. Please call me to arrange a mutually convenient
time.
Manager, Thomas Winery Plaza
and on behalf of Owner
Santa Margarita Partners
cc: William Walls
Herb Kostlan
Omar Ben Halim
Dan Parkar
6,3 LAND USE CATEGORI~ uses have been included into the specialt '
commercial category in order to facilitate
The planning area has been designed as a an ~nter-act~ve ofhce/commerc~al
composite of various individual land use .' uses have been incl~
zones which provide a rich texture and
diversity to the community. Specifically, 6.3.1.2
these Land Use Categories consist of the Community Commercial (CC)
following components:
This land use district includes a wide
6.3.1 variety of uses which typically include
Commercial drug stores, supermarkets, apparel shops,
variety stores, and commercial recreation
The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area uses. In general, Community Commercial
contains a variety of commercial facilities Districts function to promote the estab-
which are designed to promote diverse lishment of neighborhood/district level
and unique shopping environments. The commercial goods and services. Typically,
planning area contains a wide assemblage large community commercial complexes
of commercial land use categories which are designed to accommodate the needs of
range from tourist oriented specialty uses more than one neighborhood or subarea
to regional associated commercial uses. and include one or more major tenants
In general, commercial land uses within accompanied by a variety of multi-tenant
the planning area range in size and uses. Smaller, stand alone community
character, based upon their respective commercial facilities are also permitted
relationship to location, type, and within various CC districts, located on
intensity of use. Commercial land use smaller existing parcels, designed to
~ accommodate smaller satellite land uses.
Specialty Commercial ( SC )
Specialty Commercial Land Use Districts ·
are designed to accommodate specialty ,/,/
uses, which promote a special landmark
quality or create a special ambience, t ''''~
which is unique to a particular subarea.
For example, specialty uses such as ~ ~ ~-~
farmers markets, cafes, bakeries, gift
shops, and ot~er specialty theme oriented
uses located adjacent to the Thomas
Brothers Winery, complement the existing
winery structure and provide a unifying
theme. Other specialty uses, such as the
establishment of tourist oriented specialty
uses (sit-down restaurants, specialty
shops), lend support to the establishment
of a theme oriented activity center which
caters to visitors. Other specialty
commercial activity centers include the
Archibald and Vineyard intersections, all
of which include uses designed to en-
hance the character of these respective
" ,,....- It If
0
.... L .... _..,,~,-.~--_
. ,~
RESlDENTIA~ ~ MIXED USE
~ LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ~ OFFICE
~ MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL
~ MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ~ LIGHT INDUSTfflAL
COMMERCIAL PUBLI~
~ ,o,o.,~ .,~,,,0 ~o..,.~,.~~ZZ! -,,,,..~,. ,.~,LAND USE PLAN
LEGEND OFFICE
RESIDENTIAl, ~ MIXED USE
[M_~_~ MEDIUM-HIGH RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ~ INDUSTRIAL
COM. MERCIAL
pC REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL __.,
LAND USE PLAI~
LEGEND OFFICE
~RESlDENTIAI~ ]~G'[ MIXEO USE
~ LOW OENSITY RESIDENTIAL ~ OFFICE
ILMI~I LOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL I~ COMMERCIAL/OFFICE
I ~'J MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL
Fq~M~.~ PUBLI~
!~*-~ .,o,o.., ..,.... ~o.-..,.~[ZZ! """" "'" '""' LAND USE PLAN'
SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITTED (P) AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITFED (C) USES
RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES i~j~ii::~-- Subarea On~'5:._ 5u~wo
~jiiiiii~:i~5C,~C 0 MR P ~ii~ji:~ii~;!5C:CC 0 MR MHR!iii~iiiiii SC CC SuParea Three ~:!ij~iiiiiSubarea FOUr
co LMR MR U MUiZ~iiiii!iZiCC RRC MR
Antique Shops p p
.......
b) General ....... :iiii~i~i:i:.~i P P p p p
Appliance Stores and Repair E~:~ii~i::!ip
:!:!': ....... : .... !?:i:! P P
Art, MUSIC, Photographic StudIos ....... : .........
Auto 5errIce StatIon Z~s~:~!Z:i~[:iCC :~E?: C C ':z~:::.~C C :~!Ziii~i~!i~ CC C
Auto Service (Including trailers, !~::~:E~E:E~!: .:::::
motorcycles, boats, campers): ~ii~iii[ii[::i~ :~iii:~iiii:: iiij~iiSii~iii di'i!i:i:iE:
b) Rentals ~:/::~/:::~i:.!~IF
c) Minor Repair (does not Include iii~i~!~:~!i!
major engine work, muffler g~/~s~Z/:
Shops, painting, body work, ~:~::?~ ~:~L~ ~E~Z::~E::E~:~ ::~
a) Coln-op Washing :.~f;~:'~ ~:~:~::::~:~ :~:~:~:~:~:~:~
f) Parts aria Supplies .... ~:::~::::~p ~:~;~ ~::~;~:.f~:.:: C ::~:~ ~ C C
Bakeries (retail only) ::.ZS:~[~' p p ~?~?~ p p ~:.~:~: p p p p ~:.~ p P
Barber and Beauty Shops ......... P p p ~:~;~::~ p p p ~::::~::~::E:~ p p p P S~E~E~;~ p p* p
Bed and Breakfast :~::;;~ ..............
BIcycle Shops :~::;/:::~2~ P P ]:~ZE:~::~ P P
Blueprint and Photocopy Services ~ p p
Book, Gtrt and Stationary Stores ::::::=:::::: 5g:~:::~:;~ ~:z::~::;:~;E p P
Candy and Conrectlonerles ~::~:~::5~:: p p p p
Catering Establishments ~::::~:~E~::~ p p :~:::~::~::~ p p :::~::5~::5~i p p p ~;~:~ p p
China and Glassware Stores ~ P p E:~:E:~E:~:~ p p
Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots ~::~?~:: ~::~2E~;:'E
(operating On a temporary basis) ::~3~
c~cnes ~ c c c ~;:~::~;; c c c c ~;~::~;.~;~ c c c c c :~:~]~; c cc
Cleanlnq and Presslna EstabllshmentS~::?~ p p p ~:~::~ P P P ~:Z~ p p p P ~::~;::]~ P P C
Cocktail Lounge (bar lounge,tavern ~:.
cluolng relatea'entertalnment ~:~:~E~C C C ~;~ C C C ]~;~;::~:.:~ C C C .....
............... · ~C~g~:.~:~;~ C C C
ana Dasketball ~ C C ~ C C
C C :::.~Z:.::::::~:.~]~ C CC
Convalescent Facilities anO HOSDIta s:.~;~:~ p p p ~::~2~:.:j~ p
curtain and Drapery Shops :~ P ::~=.i~::~ p p :=;::Y~g= P P :=~:=~;~=.~Z?: p p
Day Care Centers :~:~:~;~:;:~CCC .=~.~:~::~+CC C C :': .... C C C C ~:~:~:~ C C C
a) over I0,000 sa. ft. ~:::f~::E:;;~?~p ~:;~;~::~p p ......
............ P ~:.}~:.::?::.L PP
::::::::::::: ~ ~;;~:: .......
sa. ft :::';' C :~:;: C :~:;~ C .:::~;::~
Retail Commercial Uses - Continued
Land Use SC CC O MR P
Christmas Tree Sales lots operated on a
temporary basis X
Churches O O O
Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X
Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern)
/,<~.../~including related entertainment O O O
Commercial Recreation:
a) Indoor uses such as bowling, ,~,
billiards ,~, ~...,,__..~_.~.~ ~ , 0 0
"""""'~'j3'F""t)~'t~'~or uses such~as tennis and
basketball O O
Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O O
Curtain and Drapery Shops X
Day Care Centers O O O
Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X
Drug Stores and Pharmacies:
a) over 10,000 sq ft X
b) pharmacies with or without spe-
cialty retail under 10,000 sq ft O
Farmers Markets X
Floor Covering Shops X
Florist Shops X X X
Furniture Stores X X
Hardware Stores X
Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing
Clinics X O
Hobby Shops X X
Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X
Janitcrial Services and Supplies X
SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS
AND LAND USE REGULATION
Rewsed: 4 1890 IV-9.12 SUBAREAONE
Retail Commercial Uses - Continued
Land Use S C C C O M H R M R
Candy and Confectioneries X
Catering Establishments X
China and Glassware Stores X X
Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots operated on a
temporary Basis X
Churches O O O O
Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X
Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge. tavern)
including related entertainment O O O
/""' C/"""'Ommercial Recreation~
/~' a) Indoor uses such as bowling,
basketball O O
Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O O O
Curtain and Drapery Shops X X
Day Care Centers O O O O
Delicalessens and Specialb/Food Stores X X
Drug Stores and Pharmacies:
a) over 10,000 sq ft X
b) pharmacies with or without spe-
cialty retail under 10,000 sq ft O
Farmers Markets X
Floor Covering Shops X
I SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS
~ I I · AND LAND U~E REGULATION
Rewsech 4/18/90 IV-9.26 ~ ' ~ SUBAREA TW~'r
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02,
REQUESTING TO AMEND THE SPECIFIC PLAN BY ADDING INDOOR
COMMERCIAL RECREATION AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE SPECIALTY
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS 1 AND 2, AND MAKING
FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. OAS Investors has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard
specific Plan Amendment No. 94-02, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of August 1994, the Planning Commission of the
city of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on August 10, 1994, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies
of the General Plan; and
b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land
Use Element and the Foothill Boulevard specific Plan; and
c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact
on the environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
FBSPA 94-02 - OAS INVESTORS
AuguSt 10, 1994
Page 2
b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project
identified above in this Resolution has been prepared and reviewed in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended,
and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds
that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there
is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect
on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant
to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Foothill
Boulevard specific Plan Amendment 94-02, to modify the Foothill Boulevard
specific Plan per the attached City Council Resolution.
6. The secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Larry T. McNiel, Vice chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10th day of August 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, AMENDING THE FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN BY ADDING INDOOR COMMERCIAL
RECREATION AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS 1 AND 2.
A. Recitals.
1. OAS Investors has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan Amendment No. 94-02, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard
Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 10th day of August 1994, the Planning Coramission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution
No. 94- , recommending that the City Council adopt this amendment.
3. On , the City Council conducted a duly noticed
public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during
the above-referenced public hearing on , including written and
oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies
of the General Plan; and
b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land
Use Element and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and
c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or
detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact
on the environment nor the surrounding properties.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
FBSPA 94-02 - OAS INVESTORS
Page 2
a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant
impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and
b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the
General Plan.
4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds
that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon
substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no
possibility that the proposed Resolution will have a significant effect On the
environment and; therefore, the proposed Resolution is exempt pursuant to
state CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific
Plan Amendment 94-02, to modify the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as shown
on the attached Exhibit A.
6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITTED (p) AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED (C) USES
RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES i~!~i~ii~!~:~ubarea Oneii!~ ' ubarea Two Subarea Three ~Subarea Four
CC RRC MR LI
a) Boutidues -z.~s:::~s p p ~:EE~ESE~ES~! D p ............. p p P iii~:~:~:~ PP
....... p P ....... p P ....... P P is!i~iZ(~i!i PP
Appliance Stores and Repair ........ p ....... p ............. p iiii~iii~iiii PP
::::::::::::CC .... C C C C ...... C C C
motorcycles, boats, campers): .............. iiiiiiiii~!~ .....................
facilities) .............. l) ............. p (:) .....
P P P ......... P
C ) Mlnor Repair (does not incluae ......... i~i:~:~::~i iii~:~! ':~::' ....
upholstery, etc,) ........
~) Com-op WasRing .......... :~s~:~:~:~ ........................
e) Automatic Washing ........
~) Parts and Su les ........ p ........ p ........ p ~}~s~s~ pp
Bakeries (retail only) .............. p p ........ p p ............. p p p P ~ P P
Shops {s~E~s~s~ p p p :S:?~:{EEF~S p p p ~)~:~) p p p p ~i~) p p, P
.............. C C C C C ......... C C 0 ~:~ ' C
Bicycle ShOps
j :::::::::::::: P P~:~:~:i:~:~i P P ::::::::: .....P P ~{E~E{ P P p
BOOK, Gift and Stationary Stores
(other than adult related materlal)~i~i~ p p p ~:~?~ p p p ~E~ p p p P ~ P P C
Can~y and Confectloneries ~i~E~ p p ~E~5~E~ p p ~ p p p p ~ p p,
China and Glassware Stores ~ P P ~ P P ........ ~E;E~Z~:~:~ pp,
Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots ~s~E~E~EE~
Churches ~:~ C C C ~;~ C C C C ~ C C C C C ~ C C C
CleanmaanaPresslnaEstablishment~ p p p ~ p n p ~ P P P P~ P P c
~ ncluaing rlated en[ert nment Z~ C C C ~E~ C C C ~ C C C .......
Convalescent Facilities and Hosplta s~Z~: p p p ~:~:~:~::::~:p p p ~ ~ p ~ p ~ p p ,
Day Care Cen~ers ~ C C C ......... C C C C
SEE~:~:~:~:~:~ ............. C C C C ~ C C C
a> over ~o,ooo sq, r~. ~ p ?~?~?~p ............. p p ~ p P
Retail Commercial Uses - Continued
Land Use S C C C 0 M R P
Christmas Tree Sales lots operated on a
temporary basis X
Churches O 0
· Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X
Cocktail Lounge (bar. lounge, tavern)
· including related entertainment 0 0 0
as o ,l,ng,
basketball O O
Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O O
Curtain and Drapery Shops X
Day Care Centers O O O
Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X
Drug Stores and Pharmacies:
a) over 10,000 sq ft X
b) pharmacies with or without spe-
cialty retail under 10,000 sq ft O
Farmers Markets X
Floor Covering Shops X
Florist Shops X X X
Furniture Stores X X
Hardware Stores X
Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing
Clinics X O
Hobby Shops X X
Ice Cream Slores and Soda Fountains X X
SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS
AND LAND USE REGULATION
F:levlsed: 4,'18/90 IV-9.12 SUBAREAONE
Retail Commercial Uses - Continued
Land Use S C C C O M H R M R
Candy and Confectioneries X X
Catering Establishments X
China and Glassware Stores X X
Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots operated on a
'. temporary Basis X
Churches O O O O
Cleaning and Pressing ~:stablishments X X
Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge. tavern)
· ludin la[ed ntertainment O O O
Commercial Recreation:
a) Indoor uses such as bowling,
bill'ards O O
basketball O O
Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O O O
Curtain and Drapery Shops X X
Day Care Centers O O O O
Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X
Drug Stores and Pharmacies:
a) over 10,000 sq ft X
b) pharmacies with or without spe-
cialty retail under 10,000 sq ft O
Farmers Markets X
'~ r/
SUB-AR~ DESIGN ST~DARDS
~ ~ ~D ~ND USE REGU~TI~
Revise~: 4/18/90 IV-9.26 SUBAR~ TW~
CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: August 10, 1994
TO: Chah'xxmn and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Linda Daniels, Redevelopment Manager0~
BY: LeAnn Smothers, Redevelopment Analyst
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPM~-NT
AGREEM~-NT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Review of a
Development Agreement to re-use portion of the Regina Winery
property for a refni! store with wine tasting and banquet facilities, and
the bottling and storage of bottled wines, in the High Residential
District (24-30 dwelling ~ntts per acre) located at 12467 Base Line
Road - APN: 227-161-24
It has been requested that this item be withdrawn. No action is
necessary.
ITF~A E
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: AUgust 10, 1994 ~
TO: Chairman and Men~bers Of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: VAR/ANCE 93-05 - OAS PARTNERSHIP - A request to increase the sign
area for the Project Identification Monument Sign from 24 to 49
square feet; increase the sign area for the Tenant Identification
Monument Signs from 24 to 49 square feet; and increase the maximum
number of tenant names on the Tenant Identification Monument Signs
from three to five per face, for Thomas Winery Plaza, located at
the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenues -
APN: 208-~01-22 through 25. Related File: Amendment to Uniform
Sign Program No. 88. (Continued from July 13, 1994)
AMENDMENT TO UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 88 - OAS PARTNERSHIP - A
request to amend the Sign Program to allow a Project Identification
Monument Sign, internally illuminated Tenant Identification
Monument Signs, and various changes to the sign criteria for Thomas
Winery Plaza, located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard
and Vineyard Avenue - APN: 208-101-22 through 25. Related file:
Variance 93-05. (Continued from July ~3, 1994)
BACKGROUND: At the Planning Con~nission meeting On July 13, 1994, the
applicant stated that he is willing to work with staff in resolving any
technical and design issues for the proposed Project and Tenant Identification
Signs pending approval of the changes to the Sign Ordinance. With his
consent, the Comission continued the two items to this meeting. Since the
City Council will be reviewing the Sign Ordinance Amendment on September 7,
1994, the applicant requests a continuance to September 14, ~994, before
deciding to withdraw from the Variance application and revising the Sign
Program.
RECO~4ENDATION: Staff reco~nnends the Comission continue the two items to
Septe~er 14, 1994.
Respectfully submitted,
BB :NF: gs
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Applicant's letter of request
ITFMS F & G
FROM: Panasonic TAD/FAX PHDNE NO. : Aug. 02 1994 ll:02AM P1
AugUst 2, 1994
MS. Nancy Fong
City of Rancho Cucemonga
Planning Department
10500 Civic Center Drive
P.O. Box 807
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Dear Nanoy,
Alter discussions with my client Omar at O.A.S. Investors,
we agree to a continuance of our application [or a variance and
amendment to the Uniform Sign Program for Thomas Winery Plaza to
September 14, 1994.
Keyin McConnell
Vice President
Marketing/Sales
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: AugUSt 10, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~nission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO UNIFORM SIGN pROGRAM NO · 119 MICHAELS STORES - A
request to amend the sign criteria to allow 6-foot individual
channel letters for the tenant name and four sets of 24-inch
letters for secondary signs for Michaels, a 17,000 square foot
tenant within a 62-acre commercial/retail center in the Regional
Related Commercial designation (Subarea 4) of the Foothill
Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the south side of Foothill
Boulevard between 1-15 and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 229-031-33.
PPaJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
BACKGROUND: On May 21, 1992, the Planning Commission approved the Uniform
Sign Program for Foothill Marketplace. The program established a hierarchy of
signs for anchor, major, intermediate, and shop tenants. Initially, the
program defined the tenants and the signage allowed as follows:
1. Anchor Tenant - A tenant occupying 75,000 square feet or more of gross
leasable space. The maximum sign area shall not exceed 200 square feet
and the maximum letter height shall not exceed 4 feet and 6 inches.
2- Ma~or Tenant - A tenant occupying 30,000 to 74,999 square feet of gross
leasable space. The maximum sign area shall not exceed 150 square feet.
Thirty-inch letters are allowed with the possibility of allowing 36-inch
letters subject to Design Review CoEmittee approval.
3. Intermediate Tenant - A tenant occupying 10,000 to 29,999 square feet of
gross leasable space or a tenant occupying a single free-standing pad
building. Pad tenants shall have a maximum letter height of 24 inches-
Non-pad tenants are allowed 24-inch letters with the possibility of
allowing 30-inch letters subject to Design Review Committee approval.
4. Plaza Tenant - A tenant occupying 9,999 square feet or less of gross
leasable space. The maximum letter height shall be 18 inches.
Under the original criteria, sign permits were issued for Price Club, Wal-Mart
(Anchor Tenants), and In-N-Out Burger (Intermediate Pad Tenant).
On April 13, 1994, the Planning Commission considered a request submitted by
the center developer, Foothill Marketplace Partners, to amend the definition
of a Major Tenant to a user occupying 17,000 to 74,999 square feet of gross
leasable area. The request would allow Office Depot, PetSmart, and Michaels
to be classified as major tenants, thus allowing up to 36-inch high letters.
ITEM H
PLANNING CO~4ISSION STAFF REPORT
UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 119 - MICHAELS STORES
AUguSt 10, 1994
Page 2
After reviewing the plans provided by the applicant, the Commission determined
that the request would provide a sign in scale with the building elevations
and complementary to the architectural design. Therefore, the Commission
approved the Uniform Sign Program Amendment.
ANALYSIS: The applicant is requesting a modification to the Uniform Sign
Program for Foothill Marketplace as it pertains to "Michaels." The applicant
is proposing a maximum letter height of 6 feet for the individual channel
letter tenant identification (see Exhibit "C"). The sign will use upper and
lower case letters. In addition, the applicant is requesting approval to
install four sets of secondary sign copy, with 24-inch letters, to identify
products sold at the business. Included with the secondary signs will be
"FRAMES," "SILK FLOWERS," "CRAFTS," and "ART SUPPLIES."
1. Letter Height: In approving the Uniform Sign Program Amendment in April,
the Planning Commission determined that the increase in letter height (up
to 36") for Michaels was appropriate, given the scale and design of the
sign relative to the building face. With the new amendment request,
however, the sign is too large for the gable end of the elevation and is
overbearing. Additionally, sign criteria for commercial centers is
usually established based on the size of the prospective tenants. In
Foothill Marketplace, both Price Club and Wal-Mart have been identified as
the anchor tenants of the development given their building areas of
111,325 and 131,500 square feet, respectively. Price Club utilizes a
maximum letter height of 4 feet and 6 inches and Wal-Mart uses 4-foot
letters. Granting this amendment for the Michael's building is likely to
result in the remaining Major Tenants' (all of which are considerably
larger in leasable area) requesting similar signage. The proposed 6-foot
high Michael's letters would be visible from 3,000 feet away in contrast
to the 3-foot high letters allowed by the current sign program which are
visible from 1,500 feet away (see Exhibit "E"). AS can be seen in Exhibit
"B", Michaels is approximately 1,500 feet away from the Foothill Boulevard
and 1-15 intersection. Therefore, the additional letter height is
unwarranted.
2. Secondary Copy: In addition to the 6-fcot letter height, the applicant is
also requesting secondary signage to identify products available within
the business. Under the Uniform Sign Program, secondary signage has been
allowed. Its usage, however, is limited to one secondary sign and only to
direct customers in those instances where a secondary entry is provided
for the business. For example, Price Club has a sign for the "Tire
Center." Michaels has one public entry on their north elevation facing
Foothill Boulevard. The justification Offered by Michaels is that their
"name alone does not explain what they do, therefore, the sub-copy signs
are required." Michaels is a well-known, well-advertised, retailer that
specializes in arts and crafts supplies. FUrther, their present location
in the KMart center has established their local and sub-regional market
presence.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM NO. 119 - MICHAELS STORES
August 10, 1994
Page 3
The Sign Ordinance states that "Sign copy shall include minimal
information only. The use of subordinate information, such as telephone
numbers, lists of products, pictures of products, etc., is discouraged."
Staff believes that the separate signs for the products are not necessary
to identify the business and should not be allowed. Granting the
applicant's request for secondary copy to list products would establish a
precedent for similar requests throughout the City.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Co~nission deny the
Amendment to Uniform Sign Program No. 119 through minute action.
Respec lly itted,
BB:SM:Sp
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Applicant
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Proposed Signs
Exhibit "D" - Previously Approved Sign Design
Exhibit "E" - Visibility Chart
June 21,1994
Mr. Scott Murphy
Planning Department
City of Rancho Cucamonga
P.O. Box 807
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
RE: Michaels Stores
Foothill Marketplace
Dear Scott:
Michaels is requesting one (1) set of 6' high Michaels letters and four (4) sets of
secondary copy at 24" high which is there National Sign Program. It is essential that
Michaels has this size signs to be successful. Michaels employs approximately 30-50
people and sales in California are approximately 4 million a year per store. The
Michaels name alone does not explain what they do. therefore the sub-copy signs are
required.
We feel this request is reasonable and will have no adverse affect to the surrounding
community.
Please feel free to call if any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
~don~e )~
President
DC:adb
~le/michmiss
5300 ORANGE AVENUE, SUITE 4"14 CYPRESS, CALIFO 630 · (744) 220-0950 · FAX: (744) 220-2494
LETTER HEIGHT VISIBILITY
2" 65'
3" 100'
6" 200'
8" 350'
9" 400'
10" 450'
12" 525'
15" 630'
18' 750'
24" 1000'
30 '* 1250'
42'* 1750'
48" 2000'
54" 2250'
60" 2500'
7'
8'
9' 4500'
10' 5000'
11' 5500'
12' 6000'
NOTE The lollowing 0~stances wdl vary apDrox-
5280' equals one (1) rode Maximum d~stance m
COlor would De RED or BLACK on WHITE back-
ground I:mdmgS base0 on N E S A iests 1970
The alx)ve hgures Substanhated by test Compded
Oy C, ahfornea Inslelute Of TeCnnology. Pasadena
M j I k Notice how the visual
impact, or effectiveness,
graduates as the weight of
Milk """ '""'"""
Although the message and
Milk '"""
same, the heavier letters
Milk ...
read from father away.
Milk
Milk
Milk
I~ ? ~b''~ "~'