HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/10/12 - Agenda Packet~~~ CITY OF
~- RANCHO CUCAMONGA
PLANNING COMMISSION
_ AGENDA
1977
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 12, 1994 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Pledge of Allegiance
II. Roll Call
Chairman Barker Commissioner Melcher __
Vice Chairman McNiel __ Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner Lumpp
III. Announcements
IV. Approval of Minutes
Adjourned Meeting of July 13, 1994
September 14, 1994
Adjourned Meeting of September 14, 1994
V. Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which
concerned individuals may voice their opinion of
the related project. Please wait to be recognized
by the Chairman and address the Commission by
stating your name and address. All such opinions
shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for
each project. Please sign in after speaking.
A. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-05 - CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the
procedures for review of single family
residences. in hillside areas.
VI. New Business
B. MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-11 - BERTINO - An
appeal of the City Planner's conditions of
approval requiring a 25-foot setback on Eighth
Street, dedication of right-of-way for the
entry monument, relocation of the driveway
access, and undergrounding of utilities serving
the site as related to a 770 square foot
addition to an existing automotive repair shop
in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1)
of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, located
on the northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and
Eighth Street - APN: 207-271-33.
VII. Director,s Reports
C. TOWN CENTER SQUARE UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM
WESTERN D~V~LOPMENT CO.
VIII. Public Comments
This is the time and place for the general public
to address the Commission. Items to be discussed
here are those which do not already appear on this
agenda.
IX. Commission Business
D. DISCUSSION OF FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 PLANNING
DIVISION WORK PROGRAM
E. DESIGN EXCELLENCE AWARD - (Oral report)
X. Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative
Regulations that set an 11:00 P.M. adjournment
time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be
heard only with the consent of the Commission.
VICINITY MAP
,k CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 12, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members Of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A
request to amend the procedures for review of single family
residences in hillside areas.
BACKGROUND: On September 14, 1994 the Planning Commission stated that
individual custom residences in the hillside area should not require review by
the Planning Commission. The Commission felt that review by the Design Review
Committee and approval by the City Planner would be more appropriate.
ANALYSIS: The Hillside Development Ordinance was adopted in 1990 to govern
development within those areas of the community defined as hillside (i.e., 8
percent slope or greater). The Ordinance currently requires review and
approval by the Planning Commission when one or more of the following
conditions exist:
1. Natural slopes equal to or greater than 15 percent on all or part of
a subject site.
2. For fills or excavations equal to or exceeding 5 feet in vertical
depth at their deepest point measured from the natural ground
surface.
3. For excavations or fills, or any combination thereof, equal to or
exceeding 1,500 cubic yards.
4. Any excavation or fill which will encroach onto or alter a natural
drainage channel or watercourse. ( Should be prohibited unless
alternate drainage is provided).
5. Any other proposal referred to the Planning Commission by the Grading
Committee or City Planner.
The proposed amendment would give approval authority to the City Planner.
This action would be consistent with the recently adopted streamlining
amendments. Since adoption of the Hillside Development Ordinance, many custom
homes have been processed through the Planning Commission. Based upon the
experience gained, staff would agree with the Planning Commission's comments
that it is not necessary for individual residences to go before the full
Planning Commission. In most cases, the lots were previously rough graded and
the major grading issues were already decided. The guidelines and standards
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DCA 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 12, 1994
Page 2
Of the Hillside Development Ordinance are comprehensive enough to regulate the
design Of custom homes subject to Design Review Cor~nittee and Grading
Co~ittee scrutiny.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff reco~nends that the Planning Commission recommend
approval of the amendment to the City Council through adoption of the attached
Resolution of approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Brad/<_uller
City Planner
BB:DC:ralg
Attachments: Resolution of Approval for DCA 94-05
Draft Ordinance
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
R/~NCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
DEVELOPMENT CODE ~24ENDMENT 94-05 ~2~ENDING CHAPTER 17.24,
HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MUNICIPAL CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The City of Rancho cucamonga has filed an application for
Development Code ~nendment No. 94-05, as described in the title of this
Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Code
Amendment is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 12th day of October 1994, the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the
application and concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution
have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the
Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts
set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing on October 12, 1994, including
written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within the City;
and
b. The proposed amendment will not have a significant impact on
the environment.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission
during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of
facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and
concludes as follows:
a. That this amendment does not conflict with the Land Use
Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the
district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related
development; and
b. That the proposed amendment is consistent with the objectives
of the Development Code; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DCA 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 12, 1994
Page 2
c. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity; and
d. That the proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the
objectives of the General Plan or the Development Code.
4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been prepared
and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further,
specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with
certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a
significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment
is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3).
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
l, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves as follows:
a. That the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
hereby recommends approval of Development Code Amendment 94-05 to modify the
Municipal code per the attached Ordinance.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of
this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 12th day of October 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 94-05,
AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 17.24, HILLSIDE
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT
THEREOF.
A. Recitals.
1. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to streamline the
review process for individual single family residences in hillside areas.
This Council hereby finds and declares its intent:
a. That the review process should be simplified without
compromising the quality of development.
b. To create greater efficiency in the process to allow the
Planing Commission to focus on broader policy issues.
c. To maintain a process that is timely, fair, and thorough.
2. On October 12, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the above
referenced Development Code Amendment and, following the conclusion thereof,
adopted its Resolution No. , recommending that the City Council of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt these amendments.
3. On , the Council conducted and concluded a duly
noticed public hearing concerning the subject amendments to the Development
Code.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance
have occurred.
B. Ordinance.
The City council of the city of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as
follows:
SECTION l: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of
the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and
correct.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that this amendment is established and adopted to protect and promote
the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience, welfare; and more
particularly;
1. To implement the goals and objectives of the General Plan and to
guide and manage the future growth of the City in accordance with such plan;
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 12, 1994
Page 2
2. TO protect the physical, social, and economic stability of
commercial, office and other land uses within the City to assure its orderly
and beneficial development;
3. To reduce hazards to the public resulting from the inappropriate
location, use, or design of buildings, and other improvements; and
4. To attain the physical, social, and economic advantages
resulting from comprehensive and orderly land use and resource planning.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby
finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that, based upon
substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is not
possibility that the proposed Ordinance will have a significant effect on the
environment and therefore, the proposed Ordinance is exempt pursuant to State
CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3).
SECTION 4. Section 17.24.020 is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 17.24.020 Review Procedures
All projects within a hillside area (8 percent slope or
greater), including but not limited to, parcel maps, tentative tract maps, and
site plans for development review, as well as General Plan and Development
District Amendments, shall be subject to Grading Committee and Design Review
Committee review with approval by the City Planner, or Planning Commission in
accordance with the provisions contained in Sections 17.06.010 and
19.04.060. Additionally, review by the Grading Committee and Design Review
Committee with approval by the city Planner or Planning Commission will also
be required for other types of development or grading which meet the criteria
specified in Sections 17.24.020A, B, and C.
A. City Planner Review The city Planner shall review all
site development applications and shall impose conditions
deemed appropriate when one or more of the following
activities are proposed.
1. Natural slopes which are 8 percent or greater but less
than 15 percent On all or part of a subject site, or
On less steep land which may be affected by areas of
greater slope (e.g., flat parcel between or adjacent
to steep hillside).
2. For fills or excavations equal to or exceeding 3 feet
but less than 5 feet in vertical depth, at their
deepest point measured from the natural ground
surface.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 12, 1994
Page 3
3. For excavations or fills, or any combination thereof,
equal to or exceeding 100 cubic yards, but less than
1,500 cubic yards.
4. Residential construction involving four or less
dwelling units, such as custom homes, regardless of
natural slope or the amount of fill or excavation.
B. Planninq Commission Review. The Planning Commission shall
review site development applications and impose conditions
deemed appropriate when one or more of the following
activities are proposed:
1. Natural slopes equal to or greater than 15 percent on
all or part of a subject site.
2. For fills or excavations equal to or exceeding 5 feet
in vertical depth at their deepest point measured from
the natural ground surface.
3. For excavations or fills, or any combination thereof,
equal to or exceeding 1,500 cubic yards.
4. Any excavation or fill which will encroach onto or
alter a natural drainage channel or watercourse.
(Should be prohibited unless alternate drainage is
provided).
5. Any other proposal referred to the Planning commission
by the Grading Committee or City Planner.
C. Exceptions. Projects which are limited in scope (e.g.,
regarding of yard areas, pool/spa construction, additions
to existing structures and/or construction of accessory
structures which are less than 250 square feet) may be
deferred to staff level review and approval by the City
Planner. However, projects which require grading of large
flat areas, including, but not limited to, such items as
tennis courts or riding rings, shall be reviewed by the
City Planner or may be referred to the Planning Commission
if determined necessary by the City Planner.
D. Interpretation of Standards. If ambiguity arises
concerning interpretation of the provisions contained in
Sections 17.24.010 through 17.24.090, the City Planner
shall review to determine compliance with the provisions
contained within the section or he may refer the matter to
the Planning Commission for consideration.
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO.
DCA 94-05 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
October 12, 1994
Page 4
SECTION 5. PUBLICATION The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the
City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its
passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of
general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and
circulated in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California.
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 12, 1994
TO: Chairman and Member of the Planning Commission
FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer
BY: Maria E. Pcrcz, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-11 - BERTINO - An appeal of the City
Planncrls Conditions of Approval requiring a 25 foot set back on Eighth Street,
dedication of right-of-way for the entry monument, relocation of the driveway access,
and undergrounding of utilities serving the site as related to a 770 square foot
addition to an auto repair shop in the General Industrial District (Subarea 1) of the
industrial area specific plan, located on the northwest comer of Vineyard Avenue and
Eight Street - APN 207-271-33
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS: The Minor Development Review 94-11 was conditionally approved
by the City Planner on August 15, 1994 (see attached letter of approval). The applicant submitted
a letter of appeal requesting modification to Planning Condition Number 4 and relief from
Engineering Conditions Numbers, 2, 4, and 5. The applicant's appeal letter is attached.
Planning Condition No. 4 reads:
"The site shall be provided with Landscape screening material and a decorative masonry wall
along the Eighth Street frontage. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Such plan shall be prepared by a licensed
Landscape Architect. Landscape setback shall be 25 feet from the face of the ultimate curb
location."
Planning staff has indicated that this condition should be addressed with an application for a
variance. Said application will be scheduled for your consideration based on the outcome of this
heating.
Engineering Condition No. 2 reads:
"Right-of-way shall be dedicated for the entry, monument at the northwest comer of Vineyard
Avenue and Eighth Street to the satisfaction of the City Engineer."
/
IT]~4 B
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MDR 94-I 1- BERTINO
October 12, 1994
The applicant was conditioned to dedicate right-of-way to accommodate a future entry monument
on the northwest comer of Vineyard Avenue and Eighth Street as indicated by the approved entry
monument sign program. The program was approved by subcommittees of the City Council and
Planning Commission in a January 9, 1989 meeting, as stated in a memorandum to the Mayor and
City Council dated February 24, 1989 (see attached copy).
Engineering Condition No. 4 reads:
"The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of
Eighth Street shall be undergrounded to the first pole off-site on the south side of Eighth
Street, within the City of Ontario prior to occupancy."
The applicant was conditioned to underground the utilities serving his site. The applicant's site is
serviced by overhead utilities crossing Eighth Street. The utilities on the Rancho Cucamonga side
of Eighth Street, north of the center line, have been undergrounded. This parcel is one of only two
parcels served by overhead utilities on Eighth Street, between Baker Avenue and Vineyard Avenue.
Staff could not find the site to be exempt through Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96. The
square footage of the addition is 25.8% of the existing square footage on the parcel (2978 square feet
existing and 770 square feet in the proposed addition).
Engineering Condition No. 5 reads:
"The driveway access shall be relocated a minimum of 200 feet west of the intersection in
accordance with the City driveway policy."
This relocation is necessary due to the conflicting turning movements of the driveway access and
the signalized intersection of Eighth Street and Vineyard Avenue. It is a standard requirement based
on an accepted driveway policy.
The Engineering Conditions imposed on this Minor Development Review are historically consistent
with exception to the requirement for fight-of-way tbr the entry monument. This condition is
particular to the locations as indicated on the attached monument location plan.
Staff has prepared the attached Resolution of Denial.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MDR 94-11 - BERTINO
October 12, 1994
Page 3
RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends that the Planning Commission uphold the City Planner's
Decision regarding Engineering Conditions 2, 4 and 5 and deny the appeal request by adopting the
attached Resolution of Denial.
Respectfully submitted,
Dan JamC~s
Senior Civil Engineer
DJ:MEP:dlw
Attachments: City Planner Approval Letter
Applicant's Letter of Appeal
Monument Location Plan
Memorandum RE: City Entry Monumentation-Concept Approval
Undergrounding Policy Resolution
Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Sketch of Monument Right-of-way
Resolution of Denial
Augllst 15, 1994
Mr. Charles Bertino
11047 Furman Court
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
SUBJECT: MINOR DEV]~uOP~LENT REVIEW 94-11
Dear Mr. Bertino:
The Minor Development Review process for the above-described project has
been successfully completed and approval has been ~ranted based upon the
following findings and conditions. Thank you for your participation and
cooperation during this review process.
Findings
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.
2. The proposed project is in accordance with the objectives of the
Industrial Area Specific Plan, the purpose of the district in which
the site is located.
3. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable
thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the
vicinity.
4. The proposed project will comply with each of the applicable
provisions of the Industrial Area Specific Plan.
Conditions
This project is approved subject to the following conditions:
PlanninV
1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission,
if approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of
approval.
2. Prior to any use of the proposed building expansion, all conditions
of approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City
Planner and City Engineer.
,Mayor C)enn,s L Stout ~ CouncllrnernDer Wslharn J. Alexanaer
'.'Io~of~'o-rernCnarlesJ B,jauetq [~_]
:--""~ .- '~.." Counc~irnernDer D~ane W,Ihams
JaCk ~(]rr, -~;C~ C,ty Manager Councl~mernDer Rex Gdhertez
Mr. Charles Bert
MDR 94-11
August 15, 1994
Page 2
3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all
sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City
ordinances, and applicable Con~nunity Plans or Specific Plans in
effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
4. The site shall be provided with landscape screening material and a
decorative masonry wall along the 8th Street frontage. A landscape
and irrigation plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner prior to installation. Such plan shall be prepared by a
licensed landscape architect. Landscape setback shall be 25 feet
from the face of the ultimate curb location.
5. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water
through the principles of the Xeriscape Ordinance as defined in
Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
6. The portion of the site which is currently gavel shall be paved
with asphaltic concrete.
En~ineerin~ Division
1. An additional 14 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated along
8th Street frontage for a total of 44 feet as measured from street
centerline.
2. Right-of-way shall be dedicated for the entry monument at the
northwest corner of Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street to the
satisfaction of t_he City Engineer.
3. A contribution in-lieu of construction for one-half the cost of the
future undergrounding of the railroad comunication lines fronting
the northerly property line shall be deposited with the City prior
to occupancy.
4. The existing overhead utilities (telecomunications and electrical)
on the project side of 8=h Street shall be undergrounded to the
first pole off-site on the south side of 8th Street, within the City
of Ontario prior to occupancy.
5. The driveway access shall be relocated a minimum of 200 feet west of
the intersection in accordance with the City Driveway Policy
(reference the attached copy).
6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate
Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City
Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. Formation costs
shall be borne by the developer.
Please note that conditions may specify completion of certain plans or
work prior to issuance of building permits.
Mr. Charles Bert_
MDR 94-71
August 15, 1994
Page 3
This decision shall be final following a ten-day appeal period beginning
with the date of this letter. Appeals must be filed in writing with the
Planning Comission Secretary, state the reason for the appeal, and be
accompanied by a $62 appeal fee.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact Beverly
Luttrell at (909) 989-1861.
Sincerely,
COMUNITy DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BB:BL:m3. g
Attachment: Driveway Policy
~(TT OF RANCHO CUCARONGA - ENGINEERING DIVISION
3'~.~ S,~..~,:e. C..,sttng o. ,.~.~.~ - ZOO' .. a~,er - ~00'
3. Stacking - 25'.
D. Residential Collectors Z 1Nne (44' cur~ to curt} width):
act as functionel co|letters cirr~tng LSO0+ AOT (now or in the fUtUre).
3. Project site pllns shell provide for becktrig onstte to prevent becl(Ing free and into
ProJect Gored (ntrince Design Gutde". Other projects rill require i spect41 design
3/Z7/90
September 8, 1994
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729
Subject: MDR 94-11
Dear Sirs:
First please allow me to explain my position concerning the
subject property. I purchased the subject property with the
intention of moving my business, Bertino Automotive Service, to
the site when the lease runs out on the existing location.
My grandfather established the business in this area in 1924 and
at present we have a customer base of over four thousand and
growing. The primary reason for the addition is for storage space
and light mechanical work. I plan on moving the business there
whether or not the addition is approved. I intend to run the
business at the subject property for the next thirty years and
possibly beyond if my son would like to continue with the
business.
I believe that the overall appearance of the property can be
greatly improved and I am ready to make the investment to make
the improvements given the appropriate timetable. I spoke with
Beverly Luttrell in early August and she said the letter of MDR
94-11 findings would be sent to me around the 15th of August. I
did not receive the letter until September 2, 1994. This is the
reason that my appeal is late.
Page 2 Item 4: I have no problem with a decorative masonry wall
along 8th Street frontage or a landscape and irrigation plan.
However, I must appeal the 25 foot setback due to the fact that
this property is already very shallow in depth and combined with
the 14 foor street dedication, I would lose too much usable
space. I can do a 15 foot landscape setback which would allow
enough room for the business to run at its current level. The
loss of the extra space would be a severe hardship. I am
respectfully requesting a variance on the setback code.
Page 2 Item 2: I have no problem with an entry monument as long
as it does not encrouch more than 10 feet on to my property. The
size at which the general plan is drawn would eliminate three
very necessary parking spaces.
Page 2 Item 4: I appeal the undergrounding of the utilities due
to the cost being too high for such a short distance.
Page 2 Item 5: I cannot relocate the driveway access 200 feet
from the intersection because there would be no access to the
restaurant and the property is too narrow for a drive strip
along the front. I depend on the restaurant income to pay
property expenses. I can, however, move the auto shop driveway
west which would result in two driveways. I am respectfully
requesting a variance on the driveway policy.
Owner
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 24, 1989
TO:
Meyor, Members of the City Council a Cit ~nager
FROM: Russell M. ~gutre, City Engine
BY: Laura Bonaccorst, Landscape Designer
SU~KCT: Ct~ Entr~ ~nu~ntation - Concept apparel
On January 9, 1989 the City Council sub-conmittee appointed to review
City entry Monumentation concepts met with City staff and the Planning
Conmntssion sub-con~nittee appointed for the same purpose. After review
and discussion the Council sub-committee approved the attached Entry
Monument sign program. The approved concepts are based on the concepts
forwarded by the Planning Commission sub-committee which were modified to
meet budget constraints.
The Engineering Division is proceeding with these concepts to the
construction document phase in anticipation of having the two major
gateways out to bid in late Spring.
Full size colored plans, along with material and letter samples are
available at City Hall should anyone wish to review the concepts in more
detail.
Any questions regarding the monuments should be directed to Laura
Bonaccorsi in the Engineering Division.
Rh~4:LB:dlw
John Martin
RESOLUTION NO. 87-96
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTABLISHING A REVISED POLICY FOR THE
UNDERGROUNDING OF EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND
REPEALING RESOLUTIUN NO. 86-77
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes to repeal Resolution No. 86-77 which was adopted on the 28th day of
May, 1986 and establish the revised policy contained herein;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
wishes to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in order to promote
a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City;
and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a policy to inform property
owners and developers of the City goal.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved and established that all developments,
except those contained in Section 7 and any others specifically waived by the
Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing
overhead utility lines including the removal of the related supporting poles
adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows:
1. Lines on the project side of the street*:
a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developer's expense.
b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that
undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as a short
length of undergrounding {less than 300 feet and not undergrounded
adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users,
disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an
in-lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6.
c. The Developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost
of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on the
opposite side of the street.
2. Lines on the opposite side of the street from the project: The Developer
shall pay a fee to the City for one-half the amount per Section 6.
3. Lines on both sides of the street: The Developer shall comply with
Section 1 above and be eligible for reimbursement or pay additional fees
so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of
undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street.
4. Pole lines containin 66KV or lar~er electrical lines: All lines shall be
undergrounded or in-~ieu fees paid in accordance with section l, 2 or 3,
above, except for 66 KV or larger electrical lines.
5. Limits of Responsibilities:
a. In-lieu fees shall be based upon the length of the property being
developed from property line to property line (the center of adjacent
streets for corner properties).
b. Undergrounding shall include the entire project frontage and extend
h
to: (1) t e first existing pole off-site from the project boundaries
(across the street for corner properties), (2) a new pole erected at a
project boundary (across the street for corner properties), or (3) an
existing pole within 5 feet of a project boundary, except at a corner.
6. Fee Amount: The amount for in-lieu fees shall equal the length (per
Section 5. a) times the unit amount as established by the City Council
based upon information supplied by the utility companies and as updated
periodically as deemed necessary.
7. Exemptions: The following types of projects shall be exempt from this
pol icy:
a. The addition of functional equipment to existing developments, such
as: loading docks, silos, satellite dishes, antennas, water tanks, air
conditioners, cooling towers, enclosure of an outdoor storage area,
parking and loading areas, block walls and fences, etc.
b. Building additions or new free standing buildings of less than 25% of
the floor area of the existing building(s) on the same assessor's
parcel, or 5,000 square feet, whichever is less.
c. Exterior upgrading or repair of existing developments, such as:
reroofing, addition of trellis, awnings, landscaping, equipment
screening, repainting and exterior finishes, etc.
d. Interior tenant improvements and non-construction CUPs.
e. The construction of a single family residence on an existing parcel.
f. Existing overhead utility lines located in trail s, alleys, and utility
easements with a heavy concentration of services to adjacent
developments, and the utility lines are 500' or more from the right of
way line of a Special Boulevard.
g. Residential subdivisions of four or fewer single femily residential
parcels, where the utility lines extend at least 600' offsite from
both the project boundaries and the adjacent property is not likely to
contribute to future undergrounding.
* All references to streets shall also mean alleys, railroad or channel
rights-of-way, etc.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS lOth DAY OF J~E 1987.
/ra~-B~Fly,'--D~2 Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Deputy Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cuc~nonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and
regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Co,m. ission of the
City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held
on the 10 day of June, 1987, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: EMERICK, CHITIEA, MCNIEL
NOES: CO~4ISSIONERS: TOLSTOY
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSTAIN': COMMISSIONERS: BLAKESLEY
8 th STREET. --' -
c~TY OF ONI'A~6
N
CITY OF rrm~
~ANCH0 CUCAMONGA Trr,.~- ~. c~z~ _ \ \ ~,c, ~,:~
ENG~G DIVISION EXl-rml~. ~
RAIL ROAD R/W
243.95'
II
-
I
PROPOSED ENTRY
MONUMENT
R~GHT-OF-wAY ; I
~,?,,','Z.I) T. SIGNAL POLE
,//o/~ I/
,/--,//
/,,-"//
FUTURE R/W
XIST. R/W- - 1' --
8th Street
CITY OF
MDR 94-11 SKETCH OF
~bNCH0 CUCAMONGA Trr~-
ENGINE~rNG DIVISION EXHIBIT:. C,
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFOP~NIA, DENYING AN APPEAL FOR
RELIEF FROM THE CITY PLAN'NER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-11 REQUIRING DEDICATION
OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR THE ENTRY MONUMENT, RELOCATION OF
THE DRIVEWAY ACCESS, ~ UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES
SERVING THE SITE AS RELATED TO A 770 SQUARE FOOT
ADDITION TO AN AUTO REPAIR SHOP IN THE GENERAL
INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUBAREA 1) OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREA
SPECIFIC pLAN, LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
VINEYARD AVENUE AND EIGHTH STREET - APN: 207-271-33.
A. Recitals.
1. On August 15, 1994, the City Planner conditionally approved Minor
Development Review 94-11.
2. On Septenxber 8, 1994, an appeal was filed by Charles Bertino requesting
relief from the conditions requiring dedication of right-of-way for the entry
monument, relocation of the driveway access, and undergrounding of utilities
serving the site.
3. On October 12, 1994, the planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on
that date.
4. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, T~EREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this commission during the
above-referenced hearing on October 12, 1994, including written and oral staff
reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically
finds as follows:
a. The condition requiring dedication of right-of-way for the future
entry monument is consistent with the entry monument sign program; and
b. The condition to underground utilities serving the site is
consistent with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96; and
c. The condition to relocate the driveway access is consistent with
the City Driveway Policy.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced hearing and upon the specific findings Of the facts set
forth in paragraphs i and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as
follows:
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
MDR 94-11 - BERTINO
October 12, 1994
Page 2
a. That the conditions as imposed by the City Planner are reasonable;
and
b. That the conditions as imposed are in accordance with Section
17.06.020 of the Development Code.
4. The Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby denies
the appeal for relief of the City Planner's conditions.
5. The Secretary of this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held On the 12th day
of October 1994, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: October 12, 1994
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner
Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: TOWN CENTER SQUARE UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO.
BACKGROUND: On July 27, 1994, the Planning Cou~nission approved Town Center
Square, including specific elevations for the major anchor, Best Buy (see
Exhibit "B"). The conditions of approval require this Uniform Sign Program to
be approved by the Commission prior to approval of signs for Building 9 (see
Exhibit "C").
ANALYSIS: To maintain a continuity with Terra Vista Town Center, the site is
considered a "Regional Center" under the Sign Ordinance for the purpose of
developing a Uniform Sign Program. In general, staff supports the Uniform
Sign Program since it is designed to be consistent with the one for Terra
Vista Town Center. Common elements include, a hierarchy of street oriented
project identification signs at intersections and major entries, wall signs
with individual internally illuminated letters (36 inches for major users,
18 inches for plaza shop), and on-site directional signage, as well as
materials and colors in accordance with the architectural theme.
There are several issues that have been discussed with the developer on which
staff would request Commission consideration, as described below:
A. Best Buy Wall Signs - The wall sign proposed for the Best Buy primary
entrance will be the largest within the center. Referred to as sign type
"C" (see page 29 of the Sign Proqram), the proposed sign measures 12 feet
3 inches in height by 20 feet in length. Although not specified, letter
height is approximately 3 feet 6 inches. The sign is based upon the
corporate logo with capital letters sitting inside an angled price tag.
At staff's request, the proposed single face internally lighted cabinet
sign deviates from their typical design which features individual channel
letters protruding from a lighted cabinet. Unfortunately, the tilted sign
appears "forced" into too small a space because it touches the
architectural embellishments above and below the sign. In contrast, the
sign space indicated on the elevations approved by the Planning Commission
provided adequate wall surface around the sign to frame and balance it-
Staff considers the latter to be a more appropriate design. Staff
recommends a slightly smaller sign subject to City Planner review and
approval. An example of a more proportionate design is shown in EXhibit
"D."
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM - WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO.
October 12, 1994
Page 2
B. Free Standing Pad Signage - Staff finds acceptable the proposed criteria
for a 24-inch letter height for double or single line sign copy; however,
staff believes the alternative option proposal for a 4-foot high trademark
or logo in lieu of individual letters would be visually overbearing and
recorunends that this criteria be deleted and logos allowed within the same
height restriction as tenant name.
C. Project/Tenant I.D. Monument Sign (Sign Type A-3) - The proposed sign is
to be placed within the landscaped median at the main entrance driveway
off Foothill Boulevard. The width of this landscape median is only
20 feet while the dimension of the monument sign is approximately 18
feet. Staff reco~unends that the sign be reduced in size to be more
proportional to the location and provide room for landscaping at each end
of the wing.
D. Pedestrian Signs - Staff recommends that the program include signs mounted
along the colonnade. Pedestrian signs mounted at right angles to the
storefront allow the customer to read the sign from a distance and
encourage shoppers to visit more stores by leading the eye down the
colonnade. Typically, these pedestrian oriented signs hang from
underneath the canopy, project from the storefront, or are mounted on the
columns. This type of sign would be particularly beneficial in this
center due to its linear layout.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends conditional approval subject to the
revisions as discussed herein.
d,
City Planner
BB:DC/NF:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Uniform Sign Program
Exhibit "B" - Approved Elevations Best Buy
Exhibit "C" - Excerpt Resolution No. 94-69
Exhibit "D" - Alternative Design for Best Buy Wall Sign
Y OF RANCHO CUCAMONG
PLANNING DIVISIOt,~
All OCT 06 1994
TOWN CENTER SQUARE
at Tetra Vista
SIGN PROGRAM
WESTERN/DEVELOPHENT CO.
DATE: 9/12/94
Pro, ~>, ,.
IA-Y---~K C o Py
S I GNAGE PROGRAH
Page 1 of 37
K 61T
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
NTRODUCTION
SITE IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE 4
RETAIL SIGNAGE (Anchor Tenant 50,000 s.f.
plus) 5
I. RETAIL SIGNAGE (Ha~o~ Use~ 5,000
to 49,900 s.f.) 7
IV. PAD SIGNAGE (Retail & Restaurant) 9
V. PLAZA SHOPS 12
VI. DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE 14
VII. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS t5
VII · GUIDELINES 16
IX. MISCELLANEOUS SIGNS 19
X. SIGN INSTALLATION 20
XI. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY 21
XII INSURANCE 22
XII RESTRICTIONS 23
XIV. SUBMITTALS 24
XV. EXHIBIT 'A' SIGNAGE CRITERIA 25
XVI. EXHIBIT 'B' LOCATION PLAN 37
SIGNAGE PROGRAM
Page 2 of 37
Town Center Square Planned Slqn ProRram
INTRODUCTION
This program has been developed for the purpose of assuring
a coordinated and overall signage theme, for creating
continuity for all types of signage throughout the complex
and for the mutual benefit for all tenants and the public.
All signage contained within Town Center Square shall be
consistent with this criteria and shall be submitted for
review and approval to the landlord and/or pro3ect
architect, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
SIGNAGE PROGRAM
Page 3 of 37
I. SITE - IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE
A. PROJECT I.D. SIGN.
l. The shopping center shall be identified by street
oriented signs at major Intersections around the center.
The shopping center and tenants occupying space 15000 sq.ft.
and over, will further be identified by a sign at the main
entry to the center. All Signs shall be ~n accordance with
the criteria ~n this program unless in the opinion of the
landlord and project architect, the desi9n contributes to
the overall benefit of the complex.
2. Sign Type A-1. Project wall signs will be located
at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Street
and the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Elm Street.
Each wall will d~splay the shopping center name, and two (2)
project lo9os only.
(SIGN TYPE "A-l")
3. Sign Type A-2. Two (2) smaller scale project wall
signs will be located at the intersection of Spruce Street
and Church Street and the intersection of Elm Avenue and
Church Street. Each wall will display the shopping center
name and two (2} project logos only.
(SIGN TYPE "A-2")
B. PROJECT I,D. & TENANT I.D. SIGN.
1. One (1) Project/major tenant I. D. monument type
sign, will be located in the median of the main entry drive
on Foothill Boulevard. Th~s sign will consist of three wall
panels, one (1) center panel and two (2) wing panels. The
center panel/wall will display the shopping center name and
one project logo only.
2. The win9 panels will be oriented toward traffic
flow in each direction along Foothill Boulevard and will
display three (3) tenant I.D. signs on each of the two (2)
w~n9 panels. Wing panel signs will be reserved for the
display of retail tenant user (12000 sq. ft.plus) names.
Three {3) individual tenant user names can be displayed on
each face of the wing panel signs for a total of six (6)
tenant names. The use of logos or symbols will not be
allowed on these monuments unless specifically approved in
writing by the landlord.
(SIGN TYPE "A-3")
For precise location of signs, refer to Exhibit "B".
S~9ns required for service entries, directions or traffic
control are covered in Sections IV and V.
siGNAGEPRoGRAM
Page 4 of 37
L
II. RETAIL SIGNAGE SIGN TYPE C & D. (Anchor Tenant
50,000 Sq. ft. plus)
1. Tenant shall be allowed to install two (2) wall
mounted identification s~gns. One (1) s~gn on the s~gn
fascia ~n front of Tenant's space facing Foothill Boulevard
(primary customer entry), and one (1) sign on the building
elevation facing Elm Avenue (secondary customer entry).
(SIGN TYPE C and D)
3. S~gns shall be ~n accordance with criteria
contained within this program, unless in the opinion of the
landlord and project architect, the design contributes to
the unique benefit of the complex.
4. A s~gn shall consist of internally illuminated
single face s~gn cabinet, or internally illuminated
individual letters.
A. )nternal)y illuminated sign cabinets.
a. Internally illuminated s~gn cabinets shall
consist of (1) aluminum extrusion cabinet,
(2) ~nternal fluorescent lighting, and
(3) plastic face.
b. Electrical feeds shall be concealed within the
sign cabinet and fed into the backside of sign
fascia and connect to 3unction box furnished by
Tenant.
c. All metal surfaces shall be primed and painted
to match colors specified ~n design qrawings.
S ) GN PROGRAM
Page 5 of 37
B. Internally illuminated individual letters.
a. Internally illuminated individual letters shall
consist of (1) channel letters. (2) neon
illumination, (3) plastic face and (4) trimcap.
b. Channel letters shall be made of .063 aluminum
returns with .090 aluminum backs.
c. Letters shall be ~nternally illuminated via
neon lighting. Transformers shall be housed
within the individual letters or in a raceway
located behind the sign fascia. Exposed
raceways are prohibited.
d. All metat surfaces shall be primed and painted
to match colors specified in design drawings.
5. Individual letter styles of Tenants shall be
allowed, provlOed however that design, color and spacing of
letters are subject to written approval by Landlord and City
of Rancho Cucamonga.
6. In addition to the signs described above, each
Tenant shall be permitted to place white vinyl lettering
{Helvetica Medium letter style) to provide store name and
hours information as specified on attached detail sheet
tSIGN TYPE P). The total area for this sign shall not
exceed 280 square ~nches.
7. Promotional or special event signs, banners or
flags shall be in conformance with the City of Rancho
Cucamonga's Sign Ordinance and must be approved by Landlord
prior to submission to the City.
SIGNAGE PROGRAM
Page 6 of 37
III. Retail SiRhaRe - TYPE I. (Major User 5,000 to 49,900
sq. ft.)
Tenant shall be allowed one sign per building
elevat on up to a maximum of three (3) signs per business.
However, if the building elevation that faces Foothill Blvd.
has more than one entry, the Tenant shall be allowed one (1)
sign per entry facing Foothill Blvd. In no event shall the
total number of signs allowed per building exceed three (3).
The height of each sign shall be measured from top to bottom
and shall not exceed the following guidelines:
a. Two line signs shall not exceed 36" in
total height including the space between the
lin~ and no line shall be more than 20". The
space between lines shall not exceed one third
of the letter height of smallest letter.
b. Upper and lower case signs shall not
exceed 32" including downstrokes.
c. Single line signs in all upper case shall
not exceed
d. Length of sign shall not exceed 70% of shop
~ frontage, or thirty feet (30'), whichever
L is less Shop frontage shall be defined as
~. storefront dimension or average lease bay
~Z--width, whichever is greater.
2. A trademark/logo may be combined with individual
letters if said trademark/logo is "registered" or nationally
recognized with at least six (6) open stores and is within
the allowable area and size requirements.
3. Each sign shall consist of internally illuminated
letters. internally illuminated individual letters shal
consist of (1) channel letters, (2) neon illumination,
plastic face, and (4) trimcap.
4. Channel letters shall be made of 22 ga sheet metal
5" deep, sides painted medium bronze. Channel letters shal
De fastened to and be centered on the sign fascia.
S I GNAGE PROGRAM
PAGE 7 OF 37
5. Letters shall be Internally illuminated via neon
lighting. Transformers shall be housed in a raceway located
behind the sign fascia and exposed raceways are Prohibited.
~SIGN TYPE "l")
6. tndividual letter styles of Tenants shall be
altoweq. Ali shop building Tenants shall be limited to the
following Plex~gias colors: red ~ 2793 with a maximum choice
of two (2) of the following colors not to exceed 10% of the
total letter area; blue ~2214, white ~7328, green ~2108 and
yellow ~2037 by Rohm and Hass Co. or approved equal.
Tenants w~th a trademark/logo that is "registered" or a
nationally recognized trademark may be allowed subject to
review and written approval by Landlord and the C~ty of
Rancho Cucamonga.
7. Plastic faces shall be trimmed with a 3/4" trimcap
(medium bronze) to match letter returns.
8. Sign copy shall contain Tenant's trade name only.
NC other services or ProduCt advertising w~ll be allowed
unless it ~s part of the Tenants nationally registered
trademark or logo name, suDject to Landlord and City of
Rancho Cucamonga revlew~ and approval.
9. In add3t)on to the signs described above. each
Tenant shall be permitted to place white vinyl lettering
,'Helvetica Medium )etter style) to provide store name and
hours information as specified on attached detail sheet
(S~gn Type "P"). The total area for this sign shall not
exceed 280 square inches.
10. Promotional or special event signs shall be in
conformance with the City of Rancho Cucamongas Sign
Ordinance and must be approved by Landlord prior to
submission the City.
SIGNAGE PROGRAM
Page 8 of 37
IV. PAD OR RESTAURANT S!GNAGE - SiGN TYPE G & H
1. Single user/Tenant ~n a free standing building pad.
Each tenant shall be allowed one (1) monument sign along
Foothill Boulevard, and two (2) wall-mounted identification
signs, one sign per elevation or building face, or as an
option, each tenant shall be allowed (3) wall-mounted
identification signs, one (1) sign per elevation or building
face. A combination of monument and wall s3gns may be used.
however, only a maximum of three (3) signs may be used to
identify any one business and only ~n the combinations
described herein.
(SIGN TYPES H and G)
2. Sign area shall be the entire area within a
perimeter defined by a continuous l~ne composed of right
angles which enclose the extreme limits of lettering, lo9o,
trademark or other graphic representation. The helght of
each sign shall be measured from top to bottom and shall not
exceed the following guidelines:
a. Two line signs shall not exceed 24" in
tntR1 h~iqht'Xfand no l~ne shall be more than
l~e". The space between lines shall not exceed
one third of the letter height of smallest
tter.
I~CUJD/~ b. Upper and lower case signs shall not
~t~ ~/~ exceed 24" including downstrokes.
~ Single line signs in all upper case shall
~r(~bd~5 t exceed 24".
d. Length of s~gn shall not exceed 704 of shop
frontage, or twenty-five feet (25'), whichever
is less. Shop frontage shall be defined as
storefront dimension or average lease of bay
width, whichever is greater.
(SIGN TYPE "H")
an-.c~ with the criteria
conta the opinion of the
landlord and pro3ect architect, thYselF cnnt. Libutes to
the unique benefit of the complex.
3.l¢r'. Multi-Tenant Pad. In the event that there are
multiple tenants in a free standing pad, signs shall be of
S~9n Type F.
S I GNAGE PRC, GRAbl
age of
4. Restaurant Pad. In the event that the pad tenant is a
restaurant; It is recognized that restaurants have specific
and un3que graphic, color and s~gnage needs. Restaurants
may, if they wish, submit alternate monument designs through
the Rancho Cucamonga design review process as long as colors
and materials are consistent with the restaurant's
architecture. Signs will be limited to the restaurant users
name only. The use of brand names or lo9os, shields or
crests will not be allowed on the sign unless specifically
approved in writing by the landlordAmP ~>J~CX'
(.SIGN TYPE "G") ~ Gdr..,CP/~A ~,;,.c)l,F_.f, AJ,,,,~(-~J
5. A registered trademark/logo, without adjacent
lnd3vidual letters, may be included within the calculated
sign area provided the allowable sign area for t.h~
trademar~/lnoo l~tters is reduced to thirty-three percent
(33~%) of the allowable area and that the
tour feet in ~v dimpn~nq LOgo sign shall also be sized to
be in proportion to the building face to which it is
attached. Th~s sign is also subject to approval by the
Landlord and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
6. A trademark/logo may be combined with individual
letters if said trademark/logo is a "registered" or
nationally recognized trademark and is within the allowable
area and size requirements.
7. A sign shall consist of internally illuminated
~r,d~vidual letters. Internally illuminated individual
letters shall consist of (1) channel letters/logo, (2) neon
~llum~nation, (3) plastic face, and (4) trimcap.
8. Channel letters/logo shall be made of 22 9a. sheet
metal, 5" deep, sides painted medium bronze. Channel
letters shall be fastened tc and be centered on the sign
fascia.
9. Letters shall be internally illuminated v~a neon
lighting. Transformers shall be housed in a raceway located
behind the sign fascia and exposed raceways are prohibited.
S I GNAGE PROGRAM
Page l0 of 37
10. Individual letter styles of Tenants shall be allowed.
)n the case of a single user for a pad building, Tenants
with a trademark/logo that is "registered" or a nationally
recognized trademark may use their national colors subject
to written approval by Landlord and the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. All other pad Tenants shall use the following
colors: red ~279~ with two of the following colors not to
exceed 10% of the total letter area; blue ~2214, white
~7328, green ~ 2108 and yellow ~2037 by Rolm and Haas Co. or
approved equal.
ll Plastic faces shall be trimmed with a 3/4"
trimcap medium bronze, to match letter returns.
12 Sign copy shall contain legally registered name
only. NC other services or product advertising will be
allowed.
13. In addition to the signs described above, each
Tenant shall be permitted to place white vinyl letter
tHelvetica Medium letter style) to provide store name and
hours information as specified on attached detail sheet
~ S!GN TYPE "P") The total area for this sign shall not
exceed 280 square inches. Each restaurant may also display
cr:e (1) menu provided it ~s contained within a display area
~ncorpcrated within the overall architectural theme.
14. Promotional or special event signs, banners and
flags shall be in conformance w~th the City of Rancho
Cucamonga's Sign Ordinance and must be approved by Landlord
prior to submission to the City.
S I GNAGE PROGRAft)
Page 11 of 37
V. PLAZ~ SHOPS - SIGN TYPE F
1. Tenants shall be allowed one (1) sign per bui]din9
elevation, The height of each sign shall be measured from
top to bottom and shall not exceed the following guidelines:
a. ~-Two line signs shall not exceed
l~]udin the space between the lines
than 14". The space between lines shall
not exceed one third of the letter height
of the smallest letter.
b. Upper and lower case signs shall not
exceed 18" including downstrokes.
c. Single line signs in all upper case shall
not exceed 18".
d. The length of s~gn shall not exceed 70%
of shop frontage, or twenty-five feet (25)
whichever is less. Shop frontage shall be
defined as storefront dimension or average
lease bay width, whichever is greater.
2. A trademark/logo may be combined with individual
letters if said trademark/logo is "registered" or nat3onally
recognized with a least six (6) open stores and is within
tr, e allowable area and size requirements.
S. Each sign shall consist of internally illuminated
!ethers. Internally illuminated individual letters shall
consist of (1) channel letters (2) neon illumination, (3)
plastic face, and (4) trimcap.
4. Channel letters shall be made of 22 9a sheet metal,
5" deep, siaes painted medium bronze. Channel letters shall
be fastened to and be centered on the sign fascia.
5. Letters shall be internally illuminated via neon
lighting. Transformers shall be housed in a raceway located
behind the sign fascia and exposed raceways are prohibited.
tSign Type "F")
S I GNAGE PROGRAH
Page 12 of 37
6. Individual letter styles of Tenants shall be
allowed. All shop building Tenants shall be limited to the
following P)exiglas colors: red ~ 2793 w~th a maximum choice
of two (2) of the following colors not to exceed 10% of the
total letter area; blue ~2214, white ~ 7328, green ~2108
and yellow ~2037 by Rohm and Hass Co. or approved equal.
Tenants wlth a trademark/logo that ~s "registered" or a
nationally recognized trademark may be allowed sub3ect to
review and written approval by Landlord and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga.
7. Plastic faces shall be trimmed with a 3/4" trimcap
(medium bronze) to match letter returns.
8. S~gn copy shall contain Tenant's trade name only.
No other services or product advertising will be allowed.
it ~ p~,t o~ th, T~n~nt~ trQdP n~m- without
9, In addition to the signs described above, each
Tenant shall be permitted to place white vinyl lettering
(Helvetica Medium letter style) to provide store name and
hours ~nformatlon as specified on attached detail sheet
(Sign Type "P") The total area for th~s sign shall not
exceed 280 square inches.
10. Promotional or special event signs, banners and
flags shall be in conformance with the City of Rancho
Cucamongas Sign Ordinance and must be approved by the
Landlord prior to submqssion to the City.
S I GNAGE PROGRAM
Page 13 of 37
VI. DtRECTIONAL S!GNAGE
1. One (l) monument type directional sign to be
located at the end of the main entry from Foothill
BoulevarO. The structure shall provide directional s~gnage
for three (3) major tenants and as many minor tenants as the
developer deems necessary to facilitate the smooth flow of
traffic. The minor tenants may, at the discretion of the
developer, be genetically grouped under a single heading by
goods or services and or by their location in a designated
area cf the center. This structure shall also display the
shopping center's logo. For precise location of the
sign, see Exhibit B.
(S3gn Type A-4)
S I GNAGE PROGRAH
Page 14 of 37
VII. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS
I. S~gnage required to control and manage the movement
of traffic and pedestrians shall be ~nstalled in accordance
w~th the criteria of th~s program. Traffic signs shall be
standard sizes, heights and colors and shall be ~n
accordance with all requirements of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga and the State of California. S~gns shall be
mounted on fabricated metal sign backgrounds painted in
colors complementary to the approved colors and materials
or the center. (Sign Type "L")
2. Traffic signs shall be installed in locations as
designated by a traffic engineer licensed in the State of
California. Sign locations shall be reviewed and approved
by the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior to installation and
sba!! be reviewed again after one (1) year to determine if
they are adequate in managing traffic with an acceptable
degree of efficiency and safety.
S I GNAGE PROGRAM
Page 15 of 37
VIII. GUIDELINES Building Signage for Tenants
A. General Requirements:
1. Each Tenant shall submit to the Landlord for
approval before fabrication, not less than four (4) cop~es
of detailed drawings of the Tenant's proposed signs
indicating the location, size, layout, design, materials and
color graphics. Such drawings shall be submitted
concurrently w~th architectural drawings, sufficient in
Landlord's opinion, to show the exact relationsh3p with the
store design, Tenant's store location on site and the
dimensions of the building frontage.
2. Prior to fabrication, detailed drawings of all
signs shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Division for review and approval. These drawings
must be s~gned and stamped as approved by the Landlord prior
to submittal to the City.
3. Tenant shall obtain and pay the entire cost of all
Permits, and approvals, construction, installation and
maintenance of its respective sign.
4. Tenant shall be responsible for fulfillment of all
of these Sign Criteria to the extent applicable.
5. No Tenant sha)l affix or maintain upon any glass or
other materda) on the storefront of within twenty-four
~ncnes (24") of any window, any signs unless such signs or
materials have received the written approval of the
Landlord. and comply with this Sign Criteria.
B. General SPecifications:
1. All primary identification of Tenant shall be
internally illuminated. Secondary signage may be
non-illuminated if total allowable sign area is not exceeded
in height and width, all the design is approved by Landlord
and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
2. Two lines of copy may be used as long as the total
height of sign does not exceed maximum sign height for the
applicable type of s~gnage and the design is approved by the
Landlord and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
S I GNAGE P ROGRAH
Page 16 of 37
3. The width of the Tenant fascia sign(unless covered
elsewhere ~n this program) shall not exceed 70% of the
storefront dimens3on or average lease by width, whichever is
greater, or 25 feet, whichever is less. Sign shall center
on the storefront unless prior written approval is obtained
from the Landlord and the City of Rancho Cucamonga.
4. No sandblasted or painted wood signs will be
allowed.
S. Tenant shall be solely responsible for the
~nstallation and maintenance of its own signs.
6. Tenant's sign contractor shall repair any damage to
the premises or other property ~n the Shopping Center caused
by the contractor's work. Should Tenant's contractor fail
tc adequately repair such damage, Landlord may, but shall
not be required to, repair such damage at the Tenants
expense.
7. Tenant shall be fully responsible for the actions
ofTenants sign contractor.
8. Electrical service to Tenants signs will be
connected to Tenants meter and shall be connected to a time
clock supplied by Tenant. Time clock hours shall be subject
to Landlord approval.
C. Construction Requirements=
1. Landlords' construction superintendent shall be
9~ven adequate notice prior to installation of all signs.
Failure to notify Landlord may result in removal of sign to
~nspect penetration in building face.
2. All signs shall be fabricated and installed per UL
and city standards.
3. Letter fastening and clips are to be concealed and
be of galvanized, stainless, aluminum, brass or bronze
metals.
4. No labels will be permitted on the exposed surface
of the s~gns, except those required by local ordinance,
which shall be placed in an inconspicuous )oration.
S I GNAGE PROGRAPI
5. Tenants shall have identification signs designed in
a manner compatible with and complimentary to adjacent and
facing storefronts and the overall design concept of the
Shopping Center.
6. Design, layout and materials for Tenant signs shall
conform ~n all respects with the sign design drawings
included in this criteria. The max3mum heights for letters
in the body of the sign shall be as indicated in these
criteria.
7. All penetrations of the building structure required
for sign Installation shall be sealed in a watertight
condition and shall be patched to match adjacent finish to
Landlords satisfaction.
8. No wood backed letter material will be allowed.
S IGNAGE PROGRAYi
Page 18 of 27
IX. Miscellaneous S~qn~:
1. It is understood that there may be the need for
adaitional signs for information and directional purposes.
These signs wi)) be reviewed by Landlord and the City of
Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department for consistency of
design with the Shoppin9 Center.
2. City, State and Federally required signs shall be
installed as required by the 9overning agency.
SIGNAGE PROGRAM
Page 19 of 37
X. S~qn Instsllation:
1. All work to fabricate, erect, or install signs
(including connection to electrical 3unction box) shall be
contracted and paid for by Tenant and subject to approval
by Landlord.
2. All signs shall be designed, constructed and
installed in accordance with local codes and ordinances.
All permits srmal) be obtained by Tenant's sign contractor,
at Tenant's sole expense.
3. S3gns not instailed in strict accordance with
previously approved plans and specifications shall be
Immediately corrected by Tenant, at Tenant's cost and
expense, upon demand by Landlord. If not corrected within
fifteen (15) days, sign may be removed or corrected by
Landlord at Tenant's expense.
4. Erection of any sign shall be promptly and
safely effected with as little disruption to business and
traffic as possible and with minimum of inconvenience to the
Landlord and to the other Tenants.
5. Upon removing any sign, Tenant shall, at its own
expense, repair any damage created by such removal and shall
return the area from which the sign was removed back to its
original condition. All debris from removal shall be
promptly removed from the site.
SIGNAGE PROGRAM
Page 20 of 37
XI. Protection of Property:
1. Tenant's sign contractor shall design, install or
erect Tenant's sign in such a manner that it will not over
stress, deface, or damage any portion of the building or
grounds.
2. Any sign, temporary or permanent, capable of
exerting damaging pressures on the building due to its size.
weight or design shall have its design examined by a
structural engineer. Prior to ~nstallation of such sign,
Tenant shall submit to Landlord such englneer's written
approval verifying that no unsafe condition will be imposed
upon the building or other structure to which the sign will
be attached.
3. All exposed parts of any sign or sign support
subject to corrosion or other similar damage shall be
protected in a manner acceptable to Landlord.
4. any sign on which stains or rust appear, or which
becomes damaged inn any way, or which ~n any manner
whatsoever is not maintained properly shall be promptly
repaired by Tenant. Landlord may remove and store, at
Tenant's expense, any signs not maintained properly or not
in accordance with sign program.
S I GNAGE PROGRAM
Page ol cf 37
XII. insurance:
1. Tenant shall cause Tenant's sign contractor to
submit to Landlord prior to such contractor entering upon
the Shopping Center, a certificate of insurance evidencing
that such contractor has in effect commercial general
liability insurance and worker's compensation coverage as
required by the State of California in an amount and issued
by a company acceptable to Landlord.
2. All Tenants are to carry liability insurance naming
themselves and Landlord as additional ~nsured in accordance
with terms and conditions specified in the lease.
S I GNAGE PROGRAP1
Page 22 af 37
XII1. RESTRICTIONS:
All users are subject to the following:
1. No animated, revolving, flashing, audible, or odor
producing signs will be allowed.
2. No vehicle signs will be allowed.
3. NO formed plastics or inOectlon-molded plastic
s~gns w~ll be permitted.
4. No exposed raceways, cross-overs or conduits w~ll
be perm3tted to be visible.
5. NO other types of signs except these specif3cally
ment3oned within this criteria w~ll be allowed.
6. Any type of sign contained within interior retail
areas shall be held back a m~n~mum of 10' from the
storefront.
7. Tenant will be required to remove any sign
considered to be in bad taste or that does not contribute
positively to the overall design of the center.
S I GNAGE PR_~GRAN
Page 23 of 37
XIV. SUBNITTALS:
1. Tenants shall submit four (4) copies of all
proposed signage, showing colors, location, materia)s and
attachment devices. Upon approval, tenants shall provide
landlord with four (4) sets of shop drawings, including
color and material samples for approval prior to
fabrication. All tenant storefront entrance and store
identification designs are subject to approval in writing
from the landlord.
2. Tenants shall make all necessary submittals to city
agencies and are responsible for obtaining all necessary
permits. No sign shall be installed until all necessary
permits have been received.
S I GNAGE PROGRAI'I
Page 24 of 27
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - 'A- I' Shopping Center Identification
QUANTITY (2) @ Intersection of Foothill Blvd. & ·
Spruce St. and Intersection of Foothill
Blvd. & Elm St.
MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT 5' 9'
MAXIMUM SIGN HEIGHT 32"
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE (Not applicable)
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF SIGN AREA 16' 0"
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Recessed Cove Lighting
PERMITTED USERS Project Name 42.6 s.f,
Developer Logo (2) I s.f. ea.
A-1 LOW STUCCO WALL W I RECESSED COVE UGHT1NG I.D.
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - "A-2" Shopping Center Identification
QUANTITY (2) @ Intersection of Church St. &Spruce
St, and Church St_ & Elm St.
MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT S' 9'
MAXIMUM SIGN HEIGHT 32"
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE (Not applicable)
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF SIGN AREA IZ' I 0'
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Recessed Cove Ughring
PERMI'I'FED USERS Project Name 34.2 s,f.
Developer Logo (2) I s.f. ea.
.,~.WHrTE ALUMINUM LETTERS W I BLUE TIE BACKGRO UI~I~ · };:"1 i =RS ARE 12' & 4' TALL FLUSH MOUNTED
6' RECESSED W I COVE UGI.ITING o
1/8. BRASS'U: i I ~RS FLUSH MOUNTED TO 12' MARBLE
3.5* : ' /~///57 '~ '
. i' "l"i'l"'i"..t'
A-2 LOW STUCCO WALL W / RECESSED COVE LIGHTING I.D.
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page26of37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - 'A-3" Shopping Center / Major Tenant I.D.
QUANTITY (I) @ Median of Main Entry on Foothill
Blvd.
MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT 5' 6"
MAXIMUM SIGN HEIGHT 4' 0"
NO. SIDES 3
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE (Not applicable)
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF SIGN AREA 7'
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Recessed Cove Lighting
PERMITTED USERS Project Name 20 s.f.
Developer Logo (2) I s.f. ea.
Anchor Tenants (6) 7 s.f. ea.
," '~"t'~N'~,~"' i l~ ~ [] ~'~'N"AN~' .....
I
A-3 LOW STUCCO WALL W / RECESSED COVE UGHT1NG I.D.
& ILLUMINATED TENANT I.D.
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page 27of 37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - "A-4" Directional Monument
QUANTITY ( I ) @ End of Main Entry from Foothill
Blvd.
MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT 6' 0"
MAXIMUM SIGN HEIGHT (Not Applicable)
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE (Not Applicable)
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF SIGN AREA 3'
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Flood Lighting
PERMITTED USERS Developer Logo (2) I s.f. e~
Major users, shops and restaurants
WHITE ALrJMINUM LI= i i ERS W / BLUE TILE BACKGROUND
4' TALL FLUSH MOUNTED
/
2' 6' B CO. 6' MARBLE W / 1/8' BRASS LETTERS
!' O
FLOOD LIGHTS
A-4 ONE SINGLE FACED MONUMENT DIRECTORY SIGN
SCALE 1/2" = 1'
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page28of37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - "C" Anchor Tenant
QUANTITY (I) Sign per Tenant Wall Mounted @
Primary Entrance
MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT Not to extend above vertical building wall
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE 250 s.f.
MAXIMUM CABINET HEIGHT 15' 0"
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF COPY 32' 0"
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Internally lighted cabinet
PERMITTED USERS Anchor Tenant of 50,00 s.f. +
42' 0"
TYPE C - PARTIAL FRONT SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE 1/8" = 1'
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page29of 37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - 'D" Anchor Tenant
QUANTITY ( I ) Sign per Tenant Wall Mounted
Secondary Entrance
MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT Not to extend above vertical building wall
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE 200
MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT 5' 0"
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF COPY 21' 0'
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Internally lighted letters
PERMITTED USERS Anchor Tenant of S0,00 s.f. +
19'0" '
4' 0~ 9; 0'
4' 0'
37' 0'
'. I I
TYPE D - PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION "'
SCALE 1/8" = 1'
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page 30of 37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - "F" Typical Retail PI~7~ Shop (wall-mounted
QUANTITY (I) Per building elevation maximum (3)
signs per building
MAXIMUM HEIGHT To be mounted @ designated signage
locations only
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE 30 s.f.
MAXIMUM LE'I'FER HEIGHT 18"
LETFER DEPTH 5" returns (sides) finished is semi-gloss
dark bronze
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF COPY 70% of shop width (not to exceed 25')
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Internally lighted individual letters
PERMITrED USERS Typical Tenant Shop under 5,000 s.f.
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page 31 of 37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - "G" Restaurant Monument Sign
QUANTITY 4 (I per pad) on Foothill Blvd.
MAXIMUM HEIGHT 3' 8"
NO. SIDES 2
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE II s.f.
MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT 24"
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF SIGN AREA 6' 6"
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Ground-mounted flood lights or internally
illuminated individual letters with flood-
lighting of monument background
PERMITTED USERS Restaurant pad users
'..i' ...... . :...
I ..
.
:.....,-.... . .
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page32of 37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - 'T' Major User (wall-mounted)
QUANTITY ( I ) per building elevation maximum (3)
signs per building
MAXIMUM HEIGHT Not to extend above vertical building
wall
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE 90 s.f.
MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT 36"
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF COPY 30' 0"
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Internally lighted individual letters
PERMITTED USERS Major User - 5,000 to 49,900 s.f.
SIGN TYPE - "H" Pad (wall-mounted)
QUANTITY (2) wall signs and ( I ) monument sign / or
(3) wall signs, one each per building face
MAXIMUM HEIGHT Not to extend above vertical building
wall
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PEI~ SIDE 60 s.f.
MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT 2' 0"
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF COPY 25' 0"
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Internally illuminated individual letters
PERMITTED USERS Pad restaurant only
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page 33of 37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - "J" Awning (applied lettering to awning)
QUANTITY I per designated user
MAXIMUM HEIGHT (Not applicable)
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE 10 s.f.
MAXIMUM LL~I'FER HEIGHT 12"
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF SIGN 13' 0"
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION None
PERMITTED USERS Typical tenant shop with awnings in pre-
designated location; food service only
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page34of37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - "L" Traffic Information Sign
QUANTITY (As required)
MAXIMUM HEIGHT 9' 0"
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE (Not applicable
MAXIMUM LETTER HEIGHT (Per local or state jurisdiction)
MAXIMUM LENGTH (Not applicable)
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION None
PERMITFED USERS (Not applicable)
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page3Sof 37
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - ,p, Store Information Sign
QUANTITY ( I ) per user
MAXIMUM HEIGHT (Not applicable)
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE (Not applicable)
NOMINAL LETTER HEIGHT 3/4" for hours, 2-I/2" for address and
store name
MAXIMUM LENGTH (Not applicable)
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION None
PERMITrED USERS Major users, shops and restaurants
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page36of37
TOWN CENTER SQUARE LOCATION PLAN
SPRUCE STREET
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994 Page37of 37
A
ELEVATION '1 SOU'~i ELEVATION
BUILDING 9 BEST BUY
A
ELEVATION 2 EAST ELEVATK:)N
~'~ ~-~ BUILDING 9 BEST BUY
EX~'E~IOR ELEVAIWONS
.,,_~,~.~ l'ownCenterSquare
REFERENCE PLAN
B
ELEVATION 1 SOUTH ELEVATION
BUILDING 9 BEST BUY
PLANNING COMMISSION ~OLUTiON
CUP 93-49 - WESTERN . .D PROPERTIES
July 27, 1994
Page 3
Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set
forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California' Code of
Regulations.
5. Sased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs
1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject
to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
Plannin Division
1) The Master Site Plan is subject to further
Commission review and approval prior to approval
of the design review for the next building.
2} Future development of each satellite building
pad shall be subject to separate Development
Review application for Planning Commission
approval.
3) The architectural program including, but are not
limited to, building design, architectural
details, landscape design, street furnitures,
hardscape design, design of plazas, etc., shall
be consistent with Tetra Vista Town Center
(Conditional Use Permit 88-12).
4) Two significant works of art shall be placed,
one each at the two central plazas. The art
work shall be installed with the completion of
the plazas or prior to release of occupancy for
Building 5, whichever occurs first.
i) !hUniform Sign Program shall be developed for
review and approval prior to the approval o~
~ild~ ~
e streetscape and on-site landscaping shall be
subject to city Planner review and approval.
7) All future pads shall be seeded with native
vegetation and irrigated for erosion control.
8) Trellis work shall be added to the loading area
at the north elevation of Building 9 similar to
the Ross Store in Tetra Vista Town Center
SIGNAGE CRITERIA
SIGN TYPE - "C" Anchor Tenant
QUANTITY (I) Sign per Tenant Wall Mounted @ :'
Prima. ry Entrance
MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT Not to extend above vertical building wall
NO. SIDES I
MAXIMUM AREA PER SIDE 250 s.f.
MAXIMUM CABINET HEIGHT 15' O"
MAXIMUM LENGTH OF COPY 32' 0"
TYPE OF ILLUMINATION Internally lighted cabinet
PERMI'I'I'ED USERS Anchor Tenant of 50,00 s.f. +
I
,.
TYPE C - PARTIAL FRONT SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE 1/8" _- 1'
TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER SQUARE SIGNAGE PROGRAM
September 7, 1994