HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995/04/26 - Agenda Packet CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
· PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
WEDNESDAY APRIL 26, 1995 7:00 P.M.
RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER
COUNCIL CHAMBER
10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA
I. Pledge of Allegiance
II. Roll Call
Chairman Barker Commissioner Melcher
Vice Chairman McNiel __ Commissioner Tolstoy
Commissioner Lumpp
III. Announcements
IV. Approval of Minutes
March 22, 1995
V. Public Hearings
The following items are public hearings in which concerned individuals may voice
their opinion of the related project. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and
address the Commission by stating your name and address. All such opinions shall be
limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking.
A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
95-01-KENT - A request to construct an 8,166 square foot day care facility
within an existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial
designation, located on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Highland
Avenue - APN: 201-271-92.
VI. New Business
B. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET - The design review
of detailed site plan and elevations for a 3,046 square foot restaurant on Pad N
within the Terra Vista Town Center in the Community Commercial District of
the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the northwest comer of Foothill
Boulevard and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-421-76.
VII. Director's Reports
FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 ENGINEERING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS
VIII. Public Comments
This is the time andplace for the general public to address the Commission. Items to
be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda.
IX. Commission Business
X. Adjournment
The Planning Commission has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an
11:00 P. jk[ adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only
with the consent of the Commission.
I, Gail Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,
hereby certiJ52 that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on 20,
1995, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at
10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga.
· VICINITY MAP
P "1 :E:i:E:E:E:E: ':':':':':':'::Z:~
ia I~EZ~ZEE:~:~:~'z:z:~:~ .... ":.:.:.:.:.,.......,.....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
--- , .
~~' ~ .................~ .....
,~ ~
CITY HALL
CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIMONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 26, 1995
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 95-01 -
KENT - A request to construct an 8,166 square foot day care facility within an
existing shopping center in the Neighborhood Commercial designation, located on
the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Highland Avenue - APN: 201-271-92.
PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION:
A. Surrotmdin~, Land Use and Zoning:
North - Retail buildings; Neighborhood Commercial
South - Proposed freeway
East Apartments; Medium-High Residential (14-24 dwelling units per acre)
West Gas station; Neighborhood Commercial
B. General Plan Desianations:
Project Site - Neighborhood Commercial
North - Neighborhood Commercial
South- Freeway
East - Medium-High Residential
West - Neighborhood Commercial
C. Site CharacteristiCS: The "Haven Village" shopping center was originally approved by the
Planning Commission in 1984. The majority of the center has been developed, the most recent
building being the McDonald's fast food restaurant. The applicant is proposing to construct
the day care facility on an existing building pad at the southeast comer of the site.
The main access to the shopping center is obtained from the signalized intersection along
Haven Avenue between the Unocal and McDonald's pads. A secondary drive aisle is located
to the south of the proposed building. The drive aisle provides direct access to Highland
Avenue and is used frequently by customers traveling between the shopping center and points
east. The access will be eliminated upon construction of the freeway. Access to the site will
then be obtained only from Haven Avenue.
ITEM A
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 95-01 - KENT
April 26, 1995
Page 2
E. Parking CalculatiOns:
Number of Number of
Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces
of Use Footage Ratio Reauired Provided
Shopping Center 103,999 4.5/1000 468 480
Day Care 8,116 1 space/ 18 18
employee
1 space/ 32 32
5 children
TOTAL 518 530
ANALYSIS:
A. General: The applicant is proposing to construct an 8,166 square foot day care facility at the
southeast comer of the "Haven Village" shopping center. The building will be flee-standing,
running in a north-south direction along the building pad. The main entry to the building will
be from the southwest comer of the building. The majority of the parking is proposed along
the front (west side) of the building. The playground area is proposed at the rear of the
building and is enclosed with a 6-foot vinyl clad chain link fence.
The operation is anticipated to provide service for 160 children between the ages of 5 and 12.
The facility will employ 18 people for teaching, supervision, administration, etc. The facility
will be open from 6:00 a.m. until 6:30 p.m. Drop-offand pick-up procedures require parents
to sign in and sign out their children. Also, vans are available to pick up children di~ctly fi'om
school and uanspon them to the day care facility. Parents would then sign out the children at
the end of the day.
B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Lumpp, McNiel, Bullet)
reviewed the application on April 4, 1995 and recommended approval of the plans subject to
the following:
1. The Committee felt the land use was appropriate for the location.
2. The site plan should be revised to relocate all the parking spaces from the west side of
the building to the south side. The building should then be shifted to the west.
3. In shifting the building to the west, an additional 2-3 feet of landscaping should be
provided along the west side of the building.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 95-01 - KENT
April 26, 1995
Page 3
4. Two or three dormers should be provided on the east and west elevations to break up
the roof line.
5. The gable ends on the north and south elevations should be designed with a 6-12-inch
overhang to provide a shadow line.
6. A trellis/heavy beam element should be provided at the northwest comer of the
building pad to visually tie the existing structure to the new facility.
7. Traffic control measures should be provided along the main north-south drive aisle to
reduce vehicle speeds.
8. The screen wall on the west elevation should receive rock veneer.
9. A 7-foot tubular steel fence should be provided around the facility to provide greater
security.
C. Technical Review Committee: The main concem of the Technical Review Committee
centered around public safety. The Committee recommended that the following conditions be
placed on the application:
1. Lighting should be provided, as needed, to ensure a minimum 1-foot candle
illumination within the parking area.
2. The rclocation of the parking stalls to the south side of the building would minimize
conflicts between the day care users and others accessing the site from the Highland
Avenue drive aisle.
3. The building exit system should comply with the State Fire Marshal's office
requirement for safe dispersal per the 1991 Uniform Building Code.
4. The applicant should be directed to review requirements mandated in Assembly Bill
3205 which could prohibit public or private schools within 1,000 feet of a baTardons
materials user or generator (the gas station) unless a risk management and prevention
plan is in place. The plan would establish emergency response procedures to a release
or threatened release of baTardous materials. If a plan is not currently in place for the
gas station, one may be required by San Bemardino County Department of
Environmental Health prior to occupancy of the structure by Kindercare. The school
is approximately 250 feet away from the Unocal gas station.
5. A 2-foot wide by 2-foot high shrub hedge should be provided around the perimeter of
the play area, The shrub placement is intended to discourage outsiders from jumping
over the fence.
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CUP 95-01 - KENT
April 26, 1995
Page 4
D. Environmental Assessment: In completing the Environmental Assessment, staff identified
noise as a potential impact to the project because of the proximity to the proposed freeway.
An acoustical analysis was prepared to determine potential impacts to the site. The acoustical
analysis examined both an elevated and depressed freeway profile. The analyses indicate that
the elevated freeway design will allow the higher noise levels to enter the site. Because the
elevated freeway will still be 11 feet below the building pad, the noise levels are within the
parameters outlined by the City. The 65 CNEL contour projects into the site at the southeast
comer but does not extend m the building pad. As a result, no additional mitigation is required
to meet the noise standards. Therefore, staff recommends approval of aNegative Declaration
for the project.
~: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use
Permit 95-01 through adoption of the attached Resolution.
City Planner
BB:SM:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit 'A" - LocationMap
Exhibit "B' - Site Plan
Exhibit "C' - Conceptual Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Conceptual Grading Plan
Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
' L
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF 'RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
95-01, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AN 8,166 SQUARE FOOT DAY CARE
FACILITY WITHIN AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER IN THE
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE
OF HAVEN AVENUE, NORTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND MAKING FINDINGS
IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-271-92.
A. ~.
1. Jamas Kent has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use
Permit No. 95-01, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in
this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as
"the application."
2. On the 26th day of April 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and
concluded said hearing on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
Bo ~.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing on April 26, 1995, including written and oral
staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby
specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located within an existing
shopping center on the east side of Haven Avenue, north of Highland Avenue with
a street frontage of 29.11 feet and lot depth of 446.52 feet and is presently
improved with a parking lot and building pad; and
b. The properties to the north and west of the subject site are zoned
for commercial uses and are developed with retail buildings and a gas station.
The property to the south is designated as a future freeway and is vacant. The
property to the east is designated for multi-family residential use and is
developed with an apartment complex; and
c. The day care facility is consistent with the Neighborhood
Commercial designations of the Development Code and the General Plan; and
d. The application, with the attached conditions of approval, will
comply will all applicable requirements of the Development Code.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set
forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as
PLANNING COMMISSION Pa~SOLUTION NO.
CUP 95-01 - KENT
April 26, 1995
Page 2
a. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the
objectives of the Develol~nent Code, and the purposes of the district in which the
site is located.
b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable
thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative
Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the
environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Com~ission finds that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect
upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings
as follows:
a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA
~uidelines prnmulgated thereunderS that said Negative Declaration and the Initial
Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning
Commissions and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the
information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the
application.
b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been
incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental
effects will occur.
c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the
california code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In
considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for
the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential
for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife
depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative
Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the
Planning commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby
rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of
Title 14 of the california Code of Regulations.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
3, and 4 above, this Co~nission hereby approves the application subject to each
and eveE7 condition set forth below and in the Standard conditions, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
1) The site plan shall be revised to relocate all the
parking spaces from the west side of the building to the
south side. The building shall then be shifted to the
west. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the city Planner prior to building permit issuance.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 95-01 - KENT
April 26, 1995
Page 3
2) An additional 2-3 feet of landscaping shall be provided
along the west side of the building. The final plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior
to building permit issuance.
3) Two or three dormers shall be provided on the east and
west elevations to break up the roof line. The final
plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner
prior to building permit issuance.
4) The gable ends on the north and south elevations shall be
designed with a 6-12-inch overhang to provide a shadow
line. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by
the City Planner prior to building permit issuance.
5) A trellis/heavy beam element shall be provided at the
northwest corner of the building pad to visually tie the
existing structure to the new facility. The trellis wood
members shall match the side and details of existing
trellis structures within the center. The final plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior
to building permit issuance.
6) Traffic control measures shall be provided along the main
north-south drive aisle to reduce vehicle speeds. The
final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Planner prior to building permit issuance.
7) The screen wall on the west elevation shall receive rock
veneer to match the shopping center. The final plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the city Planner prior
to building permit issuance.
8) A 7~foot tubular steel fence shall be provided around the
facility to provide greater security. The final plans
shall be reviewed and approved by the city Planner prior
to building permit issuance.
9) A m~nimum 2-foot wide by 2-foot high shrub hedge should
be provided around the perimeter of the play area. The
shrub placenent is intended to discourage outsiders from
Jumping over the fence. The final plans shall be reviewed
and approved by the city Planner prior to building permit
issuance.
Enulneerin~ Division
1} An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future
undergrounding Of the existing overhead utilities
(telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of
Haven Avenue shall be paid to the city prior to the
issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half
the City adopted unit amount times the length from the
center of the Route 30 Freeway right-of-way to the
northernmost pole north of Highland Avenue (~ 200 feet).
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 95-01 - KENT
April 26, 1995
Page 4
2) The developer shall enter into an agreement and provide
security for one-half the cost of the future
undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities
(telecommunication and electrical) on the project side of
Highland Avenue, based on the length from the center of
Haven Avenue to the east project boundary, until such
time as it can be determined that caltrans will
underground those lines at their own expense with the
construction of the Route 30 Freeway.
3) Install additional street improvements on the east side
of Haven Avenue, from the project's south boundary to
Highland Avenue (Phase II of Conditional Use Permit No.
88-18), as shown on Sheet 2A of Drawing No. 1463.
4) A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City
covering the estimated cost of operating all new street
lights, during the first six months Of operation, prior
to building permit issuance.
5} A signed consent and waiver form to Join and/or form the
appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be
filed with the City Engineer prior to building permit
issuance.
Buildina & Safety Divlsio~
1} The building exit system shall comply with the State Fire
Marshal's office requirement for safe dispersal per the
1991 Uniform Building Code.
2) The applicant shall review requirements mandated in
Assembly Bill 3205 which could prohibit public or private
schools within 1,000 feet of a hazardous materials user
or generator (i.e., the gas station) unless a risk
management and prevention plan is in place. If a plan is
not currently in place for the gas station, one may be
required by San Bernardino County Department of
Environmental Health prior to occupancy. Compliance with
AB 3205 shall be provided to the Building Official and
city Planner prior to building permit issuance.
1) Additional lighting shall be installed, as necessary, to
provide a minimum of 1-foot candle illumination within
the parking area.
2) The applicant shall work with the Police Department on a
security plan for the day care facility. Emphasis shall
be placed on after-hours security measures. The final
plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Police
Department and city Planner prior to building permit
issuance.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
CUP 95-01 - KENT
April 26, 1995
Page 5
6. The Secretary to this commiseion shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 1995.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Buller, Secretary
I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting Of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day
of April 1995, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
PROJECT .:
Su sCT:
.ooze,oN:
Those items che~ are ~ions of ~pmval.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. TIme LImits
v/ 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are ---/ /
not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval.
2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / , /.__/
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of /.__/
4. The deveiopershall commonce, partioipate in. and consummate orcause tobe commenoed, / /
participated in, or COnsummated, a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance COnstruction and/or maintenanCe of
a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to
all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the
District's property upon COmpletion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in
accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developor shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer
by the time recordation ol the final map occurs.
5. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes .__/ /
first, the applicant shall COnsent to. or participate in. the establishment of a Melio-RCOs
Community Facilities District for the COnstruction and maintenance of necessary school
facilities. However, if any school district has previously established Such a Community
Facilities District, the applicant shall. in the alternative, COnsent to the annexation of the
project site into the territory of Such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map
or the issuance of building permits. whichever COmas first. Further, if the affected school
district has not formed a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from
the dale of app4oval of the project aml l)fior to Ihe recordslion of the final map or issuance
of building permits for said project, this COndition shall be deemed null and void.
This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected
school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school
impacts as a re,suit of this project.
6. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to issuance of building permits when no map is
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site Development
v/' 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which J /
include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein,
Development Code regulations, and
.Specific Plan and
Planned Community.
v/ 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all ._J /
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
~// 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until suchtime as all Uniform Building Code and
State Fire Marshairs regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
v/* 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be .__/ /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
v/ 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for --J /
consistency priorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment
building, etc.). or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.
v/ 6. Approval of this request shall not waive comptiance with all sections of the Development _._/ /
Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific
Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
v'/' 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and
Sheriffs Department (989-6611) pdor to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall
indicate style. illumination, location. height, and method of shielding co as not to adversely
affect adjacent proparties.
8. If no cehtralized trash receptacles are provlded, alltrashpick-upshall beforindividualunits .J /
with all receptacles shielded from public view.
/ 9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations J /
and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
/' 10. All ground-mounted utility app~Jrtenanoes such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall --J /
be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry wails, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
11. Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with ._.j /
the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the ~inal map.
V/ 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, J /
including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and __/ /
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawingS, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval priorto approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior
to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine .__J /
animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the
CC&Rs.
15. The Covenants. Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Arlicles of Incorporation of the __/ /
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Atlomey. They shell be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be
provided to the City Engineer.
16. All perkways. open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the propere/ .__./ /
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be s4jbmitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or .__/ /
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for
!he subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordalidn of the final map or
sssuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of
shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other object, except for utility wires and
similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2.
18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and .__/ /
maintained in accordance with the HiStoriC Landmark Alteration Permit No.
· Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to. exte dor alterations and/or
interior alterations which affect the extedorof the buildings or Structures, removal of landmark
trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site,
shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Aiferalidn Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Commission review and approval.
C. Building Design
1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units -._J /
and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other aifemative energy systems are
demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the
time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar healing. Details shall be
included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. Aft dwellings shall have the fronl, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural .--/ /
treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner
review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for ~ /
City Planner and Building Official review and approval prio.to issuance of building permits.
v/ 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipmer;t and/or /___J
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be amhitecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plans.
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plans)
1. AIIParkinglotlandscapeislandsshallhaveaminimumoutsidedimensionof6feetandshall /___/
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb).
2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be J-----J
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/
plazas/recreational uses.
v/ 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, ._J /
entrances. and exits shall be stdped per City standards.
4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in --J /
depth from beck of sidewalk.
5. TheC~venants~C~nditi~nsandRestrictionssha~~restrictthest~rage~frecreationa~vehic~es ----/ /
on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas.
6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and ---/ /
Ranche Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval pdor to issuance of building
permits.
E. Landscaping (for publlcty maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.)
/ 1. A detailed andscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ___/ /
ing in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape
architect and subrnitteq for City Planner review and approval priorto the issuance of building
permits or prior final map a,oproval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
2. Existingtreesrequiredt~bepreservedinp~acesha~~bepr~tec1edwithaconstructionbarrier / /
in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans.
The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and tdmming methods.
3. A minimum of __:lrees pergross acre. comprised of the !oilowing sizes, shall be provided --J /
within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger.
__ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 15-gallon, and __ % - 5 gallon.
v/' 4. A minimum of ~t) % of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - J /
24-inch box or larger.
v/ 5. Within parking Iols, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three __J /
parking stalls, sufficient to shede 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21.
6. Trees Shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one
tree per 30 linear feet of building. J /
7. Aitprivates~~pebanks5~eet~r~essinvertica~heightand~f5:1~rgreaterslope~butlossthan __/ /
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. Allprivateslopesinexcessof5feet, butlessthane feet inverticalheightandof2:lorgreater ---J /'-
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one
5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
occupancy.
9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and in'igatlon shall be continu- .__/ /
ously maintained in a healthy and thdving condition by the developer until each individual unit
is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those u nits, an inspection
shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory
condition.
10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respen- __J /
sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from
weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or
decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage.
11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or J /
· This requirement shell be in addition to the required
street trees and slope planting.
12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be .__/ /
included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and
approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may he
required by the Engineering Division.
13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meander- ~ /
ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along
14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on / /
the perimeter of this project area shall he continuously maintained by the developer.
15. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. :: :;;.;t_-'~ in I~'.:'~_:::, ;7,,;.,;;-,t~;-,:-7,c~ ;,;;;s//
16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and / /
approval prior to issuance of building permits. These cnteda shall encourage the natural
growth characteristics of the selected tree species.
17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of .--/ /
Xehscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamanga Municipal Code.
F. Signs comDleuen D~Ic:
V/ 1. Thesignsindloatedonthesubmittedplansareconceptualonlyandnotapartofthisapproval. __.J.~.._/
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with t~e Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Planning DivtSion prior to installation of any
signs.
2. AUniformSignProgramforthisdevelopmentshafibesubmittedforCityPlanner reviewand ._J~
approval pdor to issuance of building permits.
3. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes _._J~/
prior to occupancy and shall require separate applloatlon and approval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmental
1. The deveioper shall provide each pmspective buyer wrttten nctloe of the Fourth Street Rock .~/ /
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a
cash deposit on any property.
2. The developor shall provide each prospective buyer wdtten notice of the City Adopted --J /
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway __/ /
project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pdor to accepting a cash
deposit on any property.
V/' 4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the __J /
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise
attenuation to below45CNEL. the building materials and constructiontechniquesprovided,
and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be
checked for contormance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
H. Other Agencies
1. Emergencysecondan/accessshallbeprovldedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire ----/ /
Protection District Standards.
v/' 2. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 feet wide -~/ /
at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
v// 3. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be / /
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for
fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system.
v/ 4. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and _J /
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
5. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all
Supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bemardino County Department of
Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official pdor to the issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-1863, FOR
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. Site Development
V/ 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- ----/-----/
cat Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable Cedes,
ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please
Centact the Building and Safety Division for Cepies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and
applicable handouts.
2. Prior to issuanCe of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition ----/ /.
to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees
may include, but am not limited to: City Beautffication Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and SChool Fees.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new Cem mercial or industrial development or ._.J /
addition to an existing development, the applicant shell pay development fees at the
established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Systems Development Fee,
Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees.
,/
4. Streetaddressesshat~bepmv~dodbytheBuilding~~ioia~~aftertract/parce~mepreCerdati~n .__/ /
and prior to issuance of building permits.
J. Existing Structure
1. Provide Cempliance with the Uniform Building Code for the properly line clearances .__/ /
Censidering use, area. and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings.
2. Existing buildings shall be made to Cemply with CeITed building and zoning regulations for ---/ /
the intended use or the building shell be demolished.
3. Existing sewage disposal radiities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to Cemply with the ..__/ /
Uniform Plumbing Code and Uniform Building Code.
v/' 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and shown on building plans submitted for _._/ /
building permit application.
K. Grading
v/ 1. Grading of the subject property shell be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City / /
Grading Standards. and accepted grading praCtices. The linal grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the appmvdd grading plan.
V/ 2. A soils rePort shell be prepared by a qualilied engineer lloensed by the State of Calffornia to .__/ /
parform such work.
3. The development is located within the SOil erosion Centrol boundaries; a SOil Disturbance _._/ /
Permit is required. Please CentaCt San Bemardino County Department of Agriculture at (714)
387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit shall be submitted to the City
prior to the issuance of rough grading permit.
4. A geological report shell be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at J /
the time of application for grading plan check.
v/ 5. The final grading plans shall be Cempleted and approved priorto issuance of building permits. .--/
6. AS a ~sto~bt suM~is~n, the following requirements shall ~ met:
a. Surety ~all ~ ~.aM ~ agree~nt executed guaranteei~ co~let~n of all on-sRe
drainag~ facilities necessa~ for dewateri~ all parcels to the satisfa~n of the Building
and Safety Divis~n pr~r to final map a~mval a~ prbrto the issua~e of gradi~ permits.
b. ~pmpriate easeme~s for safe dis~sal of drainage water that are ~u~ed onto
or over adjacem parcels, am to ~ delineated and r~ord~ to the satisfa~ion of the
BuiMi~ and Safety Divis~n pr~r to i~uance of gradi~ and ~iMi~ peaits.
c. On-site drainage impmvemems, n~essaff for dewatedng aM protecting the suMivided
pm~ies, are to ~ install~ pdor to is~a~e of ~i~i~ ~Rs for ~nst~ion u~n
any parcel that may be subj~ to drainage fbws emetiC. leavi~, or w~hin a parcel
relat~e to which a ~ildi~ ~ is requestS.
d. Final gmdi~ plans for each ~rcel are to be subm~ to the Bui~i~ and Safety
Divis~n for approval pr~r to issua~e of ~Ming a~ gradi~ ~rmits. (This ~y be on an
i~remental or ~site basis.)
e. All s~ banks in excess of 5 feet in ve~al he~ shall ~ se~ed w~h native grasses
or planted w~h grou~ ~ver for eros~n ~ntml u~n ~mpletbn of gradi~ or some other
a~emat~e met~ of eros~n ~ntml shall be ~mplet~ to the satisfa~n of the Buildi~
~f~ial. In a~ion a ~ane~ ir~atbn system shall ~ prov~ed. ~is requireme~
~es ~t release the a~l~a~deveb~r from ~mplia~ w~h the s~pe planti~
rffiuire~nts of S~ion 17.~.040 1 of the Deve~pm~ ~.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DNISION, (909) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
L. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicateS to the City for all intedor public streets /.--/
community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas. street trees, and public drainage
facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public
facilities (cross-lit drainage, local feeSer trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans
and/or tentative map.
2. DeSication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets ~ /
(measureS from street centerline):
total feet on
total feet on
total feet on
total feet on
3. An irrevocable offer Of deSicatlin for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made ---/ /
for all private streets or drives.
4. Non-vehicular access shall be deSicateS to the City for the lolliwing streets: ~ /
5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs __/ /
or by deeSs and shall be recordeS concurrently with the map or phor to the issuance of
building permits, where no map is involveS.
6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated
or noted on the final map. ___/ /
7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum building restriction area on the ,_J /
neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language:
"i/We hereby dedicate to the City of Ranoho Cucamonga the right to prohibit the
construction of (residential) I~Jildings (or other structures) within those areas designated
on the map as building restriction areas."
A maintenance agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the
CC&R's.
8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qu itclaimed or delineated on ..._/ /
the final map,
9, Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way .__/ !
shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property.
10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum ~ /
of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs, ff curb adjacent sidewalk is used along the hght
turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided.
11, The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests .__/ /
necessary to censtmct lhe required public improvements, and it he/she should fail to do so,
the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter
into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Cede Section
66462 atsuchtimeastheCitYacquiresthepropertyinterestsrequiredfortheimprovements.
Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by Ihe City
to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the Subdivision. Secudty
for a partion of these costs shell be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an
appraisal report obtained by the developer, at developar's cost. The appraiser shall have
been approved by lhe City prior to commencement ol Ihe appraisal.
M, Street Improvements
1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, /.__/
landscaped areas, etc,) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constnjcted to
City Standards, Interlet street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and
gulter, AC pavement, ddve approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees.
2. A minimum of 26- foot wide pavement, within a 40 -foot wide dedicated right,of,way shall be .__/ /
constructed for all haft-sectien sireels.
3. Construct the !oilowing padmeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / /
STREET N~,ME cuRB 1 A,C. Si~- D~NE STREET ~ET COMM :MEDIAN
Noles: (a) Median island includes landscaping a~ i~ation on meier. (b) Pavement
re~nat~n and overlay8 will De determined duri~ plan ohe~. (~) If
walk 8hall ~ ~wilinear ~r 8TD. 304. (d) If ~ ~ed, an in-lieu of ~nat~ion fee Shall
~ prov~ed t~ ~ ~em.
4. Improvement plans and construction:
a. Slreet improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- ---/---/
feted Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security
shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
the City Attorney guaranteeing completion ol the public and/or pdvale street improve-
ments, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs
first.
b. Prior to any work being podormed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a --J /
construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any
other permits required.
c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic, street name signing, and interconnect conduit J /
shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
d. Signalconduitwithpullboxesshallbeinstalledonanynewconstructionorreconstruction /.___/
of major, secondary or collector streets which intersect with other major, secondary or
collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the
street at 3 feet outside of BC R, EC R or any other locations approved by t he City Engineer.
Notes: _..J /
i (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless othenNise specified by the City Engineer.
(2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope.
e. Wheel chair ramps shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City ---/ /
Standards or as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with ---/ /
adequate detours during construction. A street ciosare permit may be required. A cash
deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be
refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be ~ /
installed to City Standards, except for single family lots.
h. Handicap access ramp design shall be as spedtied by the City Engineer. _J /
i. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. _._/ /
5, Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for .--/ /
review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being pedormed on the pd-
vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction befiTtitS shall be obtained from the City
Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required.
6. Street trees, a minimum ol 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per C~ Standards in .__/ /
accordance with the City's street tree program.
7. Intersection line of site designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with
adopted policy. _._/ /
a. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted tor all project intersections, /~
including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the li~es of sight.
Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight shall be appmved by the City
Engineer.
b. Local residential street ihtersectidns shall have their noticeability improved, usually by .__/ /
moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the st re et and placed in a street
tree easemont.
8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: .__/ /
9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete pdor to the --.J /
issuance of building permits:
N. Public Maintenance Areas
1, A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards ---./ /
shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval pdor to final map approval
or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscape parkways,
medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the
Landscape Maintenance District:
2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting ._J /
Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pdorto final map approval or issuance of building
permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be berne by the developer.
3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shell be continuously maintained by the J /
developer until accepted by the City.
4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective _.J /
Beautificatlon Master Ran:
O. Drainage and Flood Control
1. The project (or pertions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood ----/ /
protection measures shall be provided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City Engineer.
2. It shall be the deveioper's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone _.J /
designation removed from the project area. The developers engineer shall prepare all
necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic Calculations. A Conditional Letter
of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall
be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first.
3. A final drainage study shall be submitled to and approveq by the City Engineer prior to final J /
map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs firsl. All drainage
facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer.
Completion 6at~:
4. A pern'~t from the Coun~ Roo~ ~ontrol Distr~ is r~luired for ~om w~hin ~s right-ot-way.
__J /
5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe
measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. .__/ /
6. Public StOrm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a --J /
blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street.
P. Utilities
1. Provide separate utility. services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, ....J.__J
gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility
Standards. Easements shall be provided as required.
2.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. __J /
3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the J /
Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District,
and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of
compliance from the CCWD is required pdor to final map approval or issuance of permits,
whichever occurs first.
Q. General Requirements and Approvals
1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into ~ /
one parcel prior to issuance of building permits.
2. An easement for a joint use ddveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or ~ /
issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for:
/__/
3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the
estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District
among the newly created parcels.
4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondap/Regional, and Master Plan .__/ /
Drainage Fees shall be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance it
no map is involved.
5. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: ~ /
6. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Entorcemant Community ~ /
Facilities District Shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the
issuance el building permits, whichever _oc_n_jrs first. Formation costs shell be berne by the
Developer.
7. Prior to finalization of any development phase, suffident improvement plans shall be corn- ~ /
pieted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to
the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries Shall correspond to lot lines shown
on the approved tentative map.
I. EPPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE F R SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 987-6405, FOR COMPLIANCE
ITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
/ 1. Mello Roos Community Facilities District requirements shall apply to this project. .--/ /
A. A prev ous fire flow, conducted revealed
gpm available at 20 psi.
I,/'B. A fire flow shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by fire
department personnel prior to water plan approval.
v/C. For the purpose of final acceptance, an additional fire flow test of the on-site
hydrants shall be conducted by the builder/developer and witnessed by the fire
department personnel after construction and prior to occupancy.
V/ 3. Fire hydrants are required. All required public or on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed-~/ /
and operable priorto delivery of any combust b e bu ld ng materials on site (i.e., lumber, roofing
materials, etc.). Hydrants flushing shall be witnessed by fire department personnel.
V/ 4~Existingfirehydrantlocatlonssha~~bepr~vldedpriort~waterp~anappr~va~~Requiredhydrants~ ___/ /
if any, will be determined by this department. Fire District standards require a 6" riser with a
4" and a 2-1/2" outlet. Substandard hydrants shall be upgraded to meet this standard. Contact
the Fire Safety Division for specifications on approved brands and model numbers.
v/ 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits for combustible construction,evidence shall be ._J /
submitted tothe Fire Districtthattemporarywater supplyforfire protection isavailable, pending
completion of required fire protection system.
v/ 6. Hydrant reflective markers (blue dots) shall be required for all hydrants and installed prior to ~ /
final inspection.
V/ 7. An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: -~/ /
v/Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15.
t''/Other R4,/-y ~,;W.,ey/t/.~ ¢~,/~,~/A,'4 ~r,Z, Z
Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking,
plastics manufacudng. spray painting. fiammable liquids storage. high piled stock, etc. Contact
Fire Safefy Division to determine if spdnklor system is adequate for proposed operations.
v/' 8. Sprinkler system manitodng Shall be installed and operational immediately upon completion ---/ /
of sprinkler system.
v/' 9. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: ~ /
Per Rancho Cucamanga Fire Protection District Orclinance 15.
v/ California Code Regulations Title 24.
NFPA 101.
v/ 10. Roadways within project shall comply wilh the Fire Distdct's fire lane slandards, as noted: / /
VAIl roadways.
Other
v/ 11. Fire depadment access shall be amended to facilitale emergency apparatus. J /
~/' 12. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. J /
v/ 13. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance tree and clear. a minimum of 26 feet wide .--/ /
at all times during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements.
v/ 14. All trees planted in any median shall be kept trimmed a minimum of 14'6" from ground up so ---/ /
as not to impede fire apparatus.
15. A building directory shall be required, as noted below: ----/ /
Lighted director within 20 feet of main entrance(s).
Standard Directory in main lobby.
Other
V/ 16~AKnoxrapidehtrykey~a~~~sha~~beinsta~~edpricr~~finalinspedlon~Pro~f~fpurchasesha~~ /.__/
be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contad the Fire Safety Division for specific
details and ordering information.
~ .17. Gatecl/restricted entry(s) require installation of a Knox rapid entry key system. Contact the Fire/ /
Safety Division for spedrio details and ordering informatbn.
~/' 18. A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. .--/ /
v/"' 19. Plan check fees in the amount of $. ' ~ ' have been paid. ..._.J /
An additional $ ~Zi~. ~ shall be paid:
v/Pdortowaterplanapproval.
Prior to final plan approval.
Note: Separate plan check fees for fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms,
etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans.
20. Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below: .--/ /
A. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically
described below, which in the judgemant of the Fire Chief is likely to produce Conditions
hazardous to life or properly.
B. Storage of readily Combustible material.
C. Places of assembly (except churches, schools and other non-profit organizations)
D. Bowling alley and pin refinishing.
E. Cellulose Nitrate plastic (Pyroxylin).
F. Combustible fibers storage and handling exceeding 100 cubic feet.
G. Garages
Motor vehicle repair (H-4)
H. Lumber yards (over 100,000 beard feet).
_ ,o/. 14
_ I. Tire rebuilding plants.
J. Auto wrecking yards.
Junk or waste material handling plants.
K. Flammable finishes.
Spraying or d pp ng operations, spray booths, dip tanIs, electrostatic apparatus,
automobile undercoating, powder coating and organic peroxides and dual com-
ponent coatings (per spray booth).
L. Magnesium (more tha 10 pounds per day).
M. Oil burning equipment operations.
N. Ovens (industrial baking and drying).
O. Mechanical refrigeration (over 20 pounts of refrigerant).
P. Compressed gases (store, handle or use exceeding 100 cubic feet).
Q. Cryogenic fluids (storage, handling or use).
R. Dust-producing processes and equipment.
S. Flammable and combustible liquids (storage, handling or use).
T. High piled combustible stock.
U. Liquified petroleum gas (store. handle, transport or use more than 120 gallons).
V. Matches (more than 60 Matchman's gross).
W. Welding and cutting operations: to conduct welding and/or cutting operations in
any occupancy.
sc- 1o/94 15
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIVIONGA
STAFF REPORT
DATE: April 26, 1995
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner
BY: Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET - The design review of
detailed site plan and elevations for a 3,046 square foot restaurant on Pad N within
the Terra Vista Town Center in the Community Commemial District of the Terra
Vista Community Plan, located at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and
Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-421-76.
~.~f~fa~..~!: The building will sit on Pad N within the Term Vista Town Center shopping
center located at the northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue. The building pad
is rough graded and tufted.
ANALYSIS:
A. ~: The applicant proposes to build a 3,000 plus square foot restaurant
with a deli section for the retail of prepared food.
B. Desitm Review Committee: The Committee (McNiel, Lumpp, Coleman) reviewed the
project on March 14, 1995. The Committee did not recommend approval because the design
did not meet the design criteria established in Term Vista Town Center. On April 4, 1995,
the Committee (McNiel, Lumpp, Bullet) reviewed the revised plans and a perspective
rendering submitted at the meeting. The Committee recommended several changes to the
design and directed the applicant to submit the revised plans for their review at their April
18, 1995, Design Review Committee meeting under the Consent Calendar section. A copy
of the Design Review Committee action comments for the March 14 and April 4, 1995,
meetings (Exhibit "F") lists the recommended design changes for the project. On April 18,
1995, the Committee (Lurnpp, Coleman) reviewed the final revised plans and recommend
conditional approval as ou~ined in (Exhibit "G") and in the attached Resolution of Approval.
C. Environmental Assessment: Pad N is part of the Master Plan under Conditional Use Permit
88-12. A Negative Declaration for the Master Plan was issued on April 27, 1988. The
proposed development is consistent with the Master Plan; therefore, additional
environmental review is not needed.
ITEM B
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DR 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET
April 26, 1995
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review 94-22 through the
adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions.
Respect Submitted
BB:NF:mlg
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Detailed Site Plan
Exhibit "C" - Landscape Plan
Exhibit "D" - Elevations
Exhibit "E" - Floor Plan
Exhibit "F" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated March 14, and
April 4, 1995
Exhibit "G" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated April 18, 1995
Resolution of Approval with Conditions
VACANT
ZONE H
VACANT ;/ F PROPOSED LA MISSION PAI~(
SITE rdTIL, iI, ATION MA!~
TAG NOTE KEY
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
5:00 p.m. Nancy Fong March 14, 1995
5:00 p.m. Nancy Fong April 4, 1995
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET- The design review of detailed site plan
and elevations for a 3,046 Square foot restaurant on Pad N, within the Terra Vista Town Center in
the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the northwest
comer of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-421-76. (Continued from March
14, 1995).
Design Parameters: Pad N is rough graded and tufted. In September of 1992, the Planning
Commission approved a 5,000 square foot retail building for this pad, however, the approval has
lapse& The applicant is proposing to build a 3,000 plus square foot restaurant on Pad N. Attached
to this report are copies of the approved site plan and elevations for comparison.
Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project:
1. Since the main building entry is oriented toward Foothill Boulevard, the applicant proposes
a walkway connection from the building to the westerly parking area. Enhance this
pedestrian connection so that there is a stronger relation between the building and the parking
area.
2. Move the outdoor seating area closer to the south side of the building so that it relates to the
building enm] and the indoor seating, and is more visible from inside for safety and service.
3. Elevations. When compared to the original submittal, the plans have been revised to show
more consistency in the design elements of Terra Vista Town Center. However, the overall
building design still lacks the level of sophistication and detailing when compared to the rest
of the center or the previously approved plans. Because the building (Pad ND is at the comer
of Spruce Avenue and Foothill Boulevard and this comer is designated as a Type III gateway
to the Tetra Vista community, the building design should have superior architectural
treatment to all sides. Examples of design elements used elsewhere in the center are
attached.
a. The building entry that faces Foothill Boulevard is plain and appears less important
than the other tower. The tower could be increased in height and pulled out further
to provide a s~onger statement and articulation. More embellishments to the tower
could be added to provide more interest.
DRC COMMENTS
DR 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET
March 14 & April 4, 1995
Page 2
b. The taller tower with architectural treatment is located at the northeast comer of the
building behind a trash enclosure. This tower element could be placed at a side of
the building that has more visibility. This does not mean that the northeast side of
the building should not be architecturally treated.
c. Add articulation to the building plane of the east and west elevations, i.e., "recess and
pop-out," variation in vertical height, etc. An example is a colonnade with roof
overhang. Also, see attached examples of existing or approved design treatments.
.~: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues:
1. Incorporate the trash enclosure as part of the building, similar to Chili's Restaurant, which
minimizes the enclosure.
2. The pattern of the storefront windows is inconsistent with the approved ones in the center.
3. Eliminate the proposed light fixtures on the hip roof, because the center does not have this
treatment. External light rixtures are allowed on columns of towers or colonnades consistent
with the ones in the center. Sconce and gooseneck style light fixtures similar to the ones on
Chili's restaurant are allowed on building face.
4. Wrap the tile wainscot all around the building.
5. Provide a continuous walkway (4 feet minimum) along the parking spaces at the north and
west side of the building. Note that some of the proposed sidewalk connections "dead-ends"
into columns.
Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion:
1. Awnings should be of solid colors and not internally illuminated. External lighting is
allowed, e.g., gooseneck style light fixture. In the past, the Commission has discouraged the
use of multi-colored striped awnings. Commission required Chili's restaurant to use solid
color.
StaffRecommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant revise the building design to address
the above identified issues and submitted for further Committee review.
DRC COMMENTS
DR 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET
March 14 & April 4, 1995
Page 3
Design Review Committee Action of March 14. 1995:
Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Larry McNiel, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Dan Coleman
The Committee did not recommend approval of the project and directed the applicant to redesign
the building. The recommended improvements are: add roof overhang and colonnade, move the
northeast tower to the northwest side, embellish the building entry tower with additional architectural
elements, change the striped colors to a solid color for the awnings, etc. The Committee directed
the applicant to submit the revised plans for their review at the next meeting.
Desin Review Committee Action of April 4.
Members Present: Heinz Lumpp, Larry McNiel, Brad Builer
Staff Planner: Dan Coleman
The applicant presented revised drawings (dated April 4), and a perspective rendering. The
Committee directed the applicant to revise the plans, as described below, for consent calendar review
at their April 18 meeting:
1. The following changes were recommended to the entry tower:
a. Add roof overhang of sufficient cave depth for corbels.
b. Add decorative corbels nndemeath eave.
c. Add decorative element over enlxy doors, such as metal grill on top of stucco wall.
d. Delete Indian Spice painted recess andemeath arch to provide more open feel.
e. Provide recessed soffit in ceiling underneath tower roof.
f. Drop arch height, as necessary, to accommodate corbels and wall sign.
2. Drop flat parapet height, as necessary, to accommodate corbels.
3. Use solid color awnings.
CONSENT CALENDAR
April 18, 1995
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET - The design review of detailed site
plan and elevations for a 3,046 square foot restaurant on Pad N, within the Terra Vista Town
Center in the Community Commercial District of the Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the
northwest comer of Foothill Boulevard and Spruce Avenue - APN: 1077-421-76.
Design Review Committee Action:
Members present: Heinz Lumpp, Dan Coleman
Staff Planner: Nancy Fong
The Committee determined that the revised plans have addressed the items listed under April 4,
1994 meeting and recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. Eliminate the light fixtures on the hip roof tower.
2. Add sconce light fixtures on the columns of the colonnade consistent with the ones in the
center.
3. Change the color of the awning from striped black, red, and white colors to a solid color
and eliminate the intemal illumination.
EXHIBIT
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF T~E PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCEO
CUCAMONGA, C~LIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. 94-22,
THE DESIGN REVIEW OF DETAILED SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS FOR A
3,046 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT ON PAD N, WITHIN THE TERRA VISTA
TOWN CENTER IN TEE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND SPRUCE AVENUE,
AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-76.
1. Boston Pacific Incorporated has filed an application for the approval
of Development Review No. 94-22, as described in the title of this Resolution.
Eereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is
referred to as "the application."
2. On the 26th day of April 1995, the Planning Commission of the City of
Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said
meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have
occurred.
E. ~
NOW, TMEREFOME, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set
forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Eased upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced meeting on April 26, 1995, including written and oral staff
reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to property located at northwest corner of
Foothill Eoulevard and Spruce Avenue with a street frontage of 140 feet and lot
depth of 128 feet and the property is part of an improved 60 acre commercial
center; and
b. The property to the north is a commercial center, the property to
the south is an office park, the property to the east is partially improved with
a commercial center, and the property to the west is a mixed use of office,
commercial, and theater centers; and
c. The proposed design of the restaurant, together with the conditions
of approval, meets the applicable standards of the Development Code, the
Development Standards, and the Design Guidelines in the Terra Vista Community
Plan; and
d. The design Of the project complies with the established
architectural style for the Tetra Vista Town center.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET
April 26, 1995
Page 2
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during
the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth
in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this commission hereby finds and concludes as
fol lows:
a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the
General Plan; and
b. That the proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Terra
Vista Community Plan and the purposes of the district in which the site is
located; and
c. That the proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable
provisions of the Development Code and the Terra Vista Community Plan; and
d. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable
thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or
materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.
4. The Planning Commission issued a Negative Declaration for the Master
Plan (Conditional Use Permit 88-12) on April 27, 1988, and the proposed
development is in substantial conformance with the design of the Master Plan.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2,
3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each
and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
1} All building materials and colors shall be consistent
with the approved material sample board for Tetra Vista
Town Center such as, but are not limited to, 5 percent
randomly placed booster roof tiles, columns, caps,
plaster style, size of wood trellis, metal trellis, and
metal railings, etc.
2) All architectural details shall be consistent with Terra
Vista Town Center such as, but are not limited to,
cornice, medallions, trellis, corbels, wall cape, etc.
3) The applicant shall provide at the project site a 10- by
12-foot panel showing the sample plaster finish for City
Planner review and approval prior to commencement of
general plaster work.
4) All outdoor furniture such as, but are not limited to,
chairs, tables, trash receptacles, etc., shall match
those used in the Center.
5) Transformer or other ground-mounted equipment shall be
placed away from public view and screened. Screening
materials include landscaping, decorative walls, or a
combination thereof. If landscaping is used to screen the
PEANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET
April 26, 1995
Page 3
transformer, the plants shall b~ a minimum Of two-thirds
the height of the transformer at initial planting.
6) The plant palette and its density shall be consistent
with the Center.
7) Any public phones, newspaper racks, etc., shall be
installed inside the building.
8) Awnings shall be a solid color and without internal
illumination.
9) NO entertainment is permitted by this approval. No
entertainment, as defined by RCMC 5.12.020, shall be
conducted without first obtaining an Entertainment Permit
from the Planning Commission.
10) The trash enclosure design shall be consistent with the
approved design for the center.
11) Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours.
12) The entire site shall be kept free of trash and debris at
all times, and in no event shall trash and debris remain
for more than 24 hours.
13) Light fixtures on the hip roof tower shall be eliminated.
14) Sconce light fixtures shall be provided on the columns of
the colonnade consistent with the approved ones within
Tetra Vista Town Center.
15) All signs shall comply with the approved Uniform Sign
Program No. 85 for Terra Vista Town Center.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF APRIL 1995.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
E. David Barker, Chairman
ATTEST:
Brad Bullet, Secretary
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.
DR 94-22 - BOSTON MARKET
April 26, 1995
Page 4
I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly
introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga, at a regular meeting Of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day
of April 1995, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
D E PAR T M S N T
STANDARD CONDITIONS
APPLICANT:
OCAT,O.:
· /
Those items checked are Conditions of Approval
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
A. TIme LImits com~lc~o. Dat~
l/'/"1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commiesicn, if building permits are --J /
not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval.
2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / _._/ /
3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted SUbject to the approval of ___/ /
4. The developer shall commence participate in and consummate or cause to be commenced, __/ /
participated in, or consummate~, a Mello-R~:;s Community Facilities District (CFD) for the
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Distdct to finance construction and/or maintenance of
a fire station to sen/e the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to
all specilications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the
Districrs property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in
accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all
applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer
by the time recordation of the final map occurs.
5. Prior to reoordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes / /
first, the applicant shall consent to. or participate in. the establishment of a Melio-Roos
Community Facilities District for the construction and meintenance of necessary school
facilities. However, if any school district has previously established Such a Community
Facilities District, the applicant shell, in the alternative, consent to the annexation of the
project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map
or the issuance of building permits. whichever comes first. Further, if the affected SChool
district has not formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from
the date of approval of the project and lYlor to the fecordalion of the final map or issuance
of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void.
This condition shall be waived it the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected
.school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school
~mpacts as a result of this project.
6. Prior to recordalton of the final map o r prior to issuance of building permits when no map is
involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water
facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the
Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water
districtwithing0dayspriortofinal mapapprovalinthecaseotsubdivisionorpriortoissuance
of permits in the case of all other residential projects.
B. Site Development
t'/'/1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the appmved plans which ..._/ /
include site plans, architectural elevations, extedor materials and colors, landscaping, sign
program, and grading on file in the Planning Division. the conditions contained herein,
Development Code regulations, and
.Spocitic Plan and
Planned Community.
V'//2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all J /
Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.
V''/ 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and J /
State Fire Marshall's regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall
be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety
Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior to
occupancy.
4. Revised site plans and building elevations incoq;}orating all Conditions of Approval shall be / /
submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
5. Allsite, grading, landscape, irrigation. and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for / /
consistency pdorto issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment
building, etc.), or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or
approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.
L// 6. Approval of this request shall net waive compliance with all sections of the Development J /
Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community Plans or Specific
Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
7. A detailed On-site lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and .--J /
Sheriff's Department (989-6611) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall
indicate st]de, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely
affect adjacent propaffies.
8. If no cahtralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units ~ /
with all receptacles shielded from publiC view.
~/'/9. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shell meet City standards. The final design, locations, --./ /
and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval
prior to issuance of building permits.
V//10. All ground-meuhted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall ~ /
be located out of publiC view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of
concrete or masonry walls. berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City
Planner.
11.Street names shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with
the aQIopled Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map.
12. All building ndmbers ~nd individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, /._._J
including proper illumination.
13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and .__/ /
weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City
Planner review and approval priorlo approval and recordalion of the Final Tract Map and prior
to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct
all trails, including fencing and drainage devices. in conjunction with street improvements.
14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine _.__/ /
animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual
lot ownere in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity
of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the
CC&Rs.
15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the .__/ /
Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering
Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or
prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be
provided to the City Engineer.
16. AIIpenkways, openareas, andlandscapingshall be permanently maintained bythepropedy .__./ /
owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this
landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or /._J
dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of
a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for
!he subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or
~ssuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of
shadows by vegetation. structures, fixtures or any other object. except for utility wires and
similar objects. pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2.
18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shell be developed and ~ /
maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No.
· Any further meditications to the site incJuding, but not limited to, extedor alterations and/or
interior alterations which affect the exteriorof the buildings or structures, removal of landmark
trees, demolition. relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site,
shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic
Preservation Commission review and approval.
C. Building Design
1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units .__/ /
and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are
demonstrated to he of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools installed at the
time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be
included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval
prior to the issuance of building permits.
2. All dwellings shall have the fronl, side and rear elevalldns upgraded with architectural .---/ /
treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner
review and approval prior to issuance ol building permits.
Completion Date:
3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association shall be submitted for
City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance.of building permits.
v//4, All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roOf mounted ecluipmont and/or J /
projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and
streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally
integrated with the building design and constructed to lhe satisfaction of the City Planner.
Details shall be included in building plans,
D. Parking and Vehicular Access (Indicate details on building plane)
V'/1, All perking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall __J /
contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including cufo).
2, Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be -*---/ /
provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/
plazas/recreational uses.
V/'/' 3, All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, J /
entrances, and exits shall be slriped per City standards.
4. All units shall be provlded with garage door openers if driveways are less than181eet in -*--/J
depth from hack of sidewalk.
5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles ---/ /
on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit
parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designaled visitor parking areas.
6. Plans for any security gates shall be submitled for the City Planner, Gill Engineer, and ---/ /
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of building
perrnits.
E. Landscaping (for publicly maintained landscape areas, refer to Section N.)
V/ 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ---/ /
ing in the case of residential develdpment, shall be prepered by a licensed landscape
architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building
permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.
v'''/ 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier
in accordance with the Mu nioipal Code Section 19.138.110, and so neted on t he grading plans.
The location of those trees tO be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees
shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborisrs
recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods.
3. Aminimumof treespergrossacro,comprisedofthefollowingsizes, shellbeprovided ~ /
within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36- inch box or larger,
__ % - 24- inch box or larger, % - 1S-galion, and % - 5 gallon..
V/ 4. Aminimumof ~O % of trees planted within the pmject shait ha specimen size trees - ~ /
24-inch box or larger.
5. Within perking lots, trees shall be planted st a rate of one 1S-galion tree for every three __/ /
perking stalls, sufficient to shede S0% of the perking area at solar noon on August 21.
V/'/6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of onecomolcdo. Dat¢:
tree per 30 linear feet of building. _J 1
7. AIIprivateslopebanksSfeetorlessinverticalheighlandof5:l 0rgreaterslope,.butlessthan __/ /
2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for
erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation
system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy.
8. AIIprivateslopesinexcessof5feet,butlessthan8feet invertioalheightandof2:lorgreater ..-J-----/
slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as
follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger
size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope
banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater siobe shall also include one
5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be
planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this
section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to
occupancy.
9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- _._/ /
.ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit
~s sold addoccupied bythe buyer. Priorto releasingoccupancyforthoseunlts. an inspection
shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory
condition.
10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respen- .__/ /
sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous
planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from
weeds and debds add maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive
regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, add trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased. or
decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage·
11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or __/ /
· This requirement shall be in addition to the required
street trees and slope planting.
12. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be J /
included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and
approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be
required by the Engineering Division.
13. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees. meander- --J /
ing sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensitied landscaping, is required along
14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on ._._/ /
the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer.
15. All wallsshallbeprovidedwithdecorativetreatment. If located in public maintenance areas, __/ /
the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division.
16. Tree maintenance chterla shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and __/ /
approval prior to issuance of building permits. These crlteda shall encourage the natural
growth characteristics of the selected tree species.
17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of --J /
Xedscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.
~. ~lgn~ com~leuon Dslc:
1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval.
Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall
require separate application and approval by the Planning Division priorto installation of any
signs.
2.AUniformSignProgramforthisdevelopmentshallbesubmiltedforCityPlannerreviewand .__./~
approval prior to issuance of building permits.
3. Directory monument s!gn(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes ~ /
prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning
Division prior to issuance of building permits.
G. Environmental
1. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock __/ /
Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pdor to accepting a
cash deposit on any property.
2. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted ---/ /
Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City
Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property.
3. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway __/ /
project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pdor to accepting a cash
deposit on any property.
4. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the
issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise
attenuationtobeldw45CNEL, thebuildingmatedalsand constructiontechniquesprovided,
and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be
checked for conformence with the mitigation measures contained in the final report.
H. Other Agencies
1. EmergencyseccndaryacceseshallbeprovldedinaccordancewlthRanchoCucamongaFire ~ /
Protection District Standards.
2. Emergencyaccessshallbeprovlded, maintenancefreeandclear, aminimumof26feetwide ---/ /
at all times dudng construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection
District requirements.
3. Prior to issuance of building pan'nits for combustible construction, evidence shall be _--/ /
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for
fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system.
4. The apf)ticant shall contact the U.S. Postal SeNice to determine the appropriate type and .__/ /
location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead
structure for mail boxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mail boxes and the
design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior
to the issuance of building permits.
5. For projects using septic tank facilities, wdtlen certification of acceptability, including all / /
supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bemardino County Department of
Environmental Health and subm~ed to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic
Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits.
L
APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-1863, FOR
COMPLIANCE WI~ ~E FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
I. S~e Development
1. ~e appl~a~ shall ~ly w~h the latest a~pt~ Unifo~ Bui~ing C~e, Uniform Mechani-
cal C~e, Unifo~ Plumbi~ ~e, Nat~nal El~tr~ C~e, a~ all other appli~ble ~des,
ordinates, a~ regulat~ns in eff~ at the tim of issua~e of relative permits. Please
~ma~ the Bui~i~ a~ Safe~ DMs~n for ~pies of the C~e Adoption O~ina~e a~
~l~able han~uts.
2. Pr~r to issuan~ of ~i~i~ peaits for a new res~ential ~e[li~ un~(s) or major addSion
to existi~ un~(s), the applicam shall pay deve~p~nt fees at the established rate. Such fees
may i~lude, bm are ~t lim~ to: C~ Beautff~at~n Fee, Pa~ Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems
Deve~pment Fee, Pe~R a~ Plan Ch~i~ Fees, a~ ~1 Fees.
~ 3. Pr~r to i~ua~e of ~i~ing ~s for a new ~mmemial or i~ustdal developmere or
a~ition to an existi~ deve~pmm, t~ ~liMm shall ~y deve~pment fees at the
established rate. Such fees may i~lude, ~ are mt limit~ to: Syste~ Deve~pment Fee,
Drainage Fee, ~ol Fees, Perm~ and P~n Ch~ Fees.
~/ 4. Streeta~ressessha ~Pm~bytheBui~i~Off~ial, a~ertra~pamelmpre~ffiation a~ p~r to i~ua~e of ~i~i~ ~rm~s.
J. Exlmlng 9m~urB
1. Prov~e ~lia~e wRh the Unffo~ Bui~i~ ~e for the prope~ line clearances
~ns~ed~ use, area, a~ fire-resim~ene~ of existi~ ~i~i~s.
2. Existi~ ~i~ings shall ~ rode to ~mp~ wHh ~ff~ ~i~i~ a~ zoni~ r~ulat~ns for
the ime~ use or t~ ~ildi~ shall ~ demlish~.
3. Existi~s~agedi~sa fadl~is shall~re~v~,fill~a~orc~to~mplywiththe
Uniform Plumi~ C~e a~ Unffo~ Bui~i~ ~e.
4. U~e~mu~ on-site ~il~ies are to be ~at~ aN s~wn on ~i~ing plans subm~ for
~i~i~ ~ a~l~t~n.
K. Grading
/ 1. Gradi~ of t~ ~bje~ ~dy s~ll ~ in a~a~e w~h t~ Unffo~ ~i~i~ C~e, C~
Gradi~ Sta~ards, a~ m~ gradi~ ~s. ~ final grading plan shall ~ in
substantial ~0~ w~h t~ ~mv~ gr~i~ ~an.
2. A ~ils re~d sMII ~ pre~r~ by a qualified engi~er I~ens~ by the State of California to
~do~ such wo~.
3. The deve~pmem ~ ~t~ w~hin the ~il eros~n ~mmt ~undaries; a ~il Distuma~e
Pe~ is required. Please ~ma~ San Bemaffii~ ~umy Depa~mnt of Ag~ Rure at (714)
~7-2111 forpe~H ~li~t~n. ~memationof ~ ~=~ shall ~ subm~ed to the C~y
p~r to the is~a~e ol rough gr~i~ ~.
4. A g~l re~d shall ~ pre~r~ by a qualffi~ e~i~er or g~ist a~ submitted at
the tim of ~l~t~n for gradi~ plan c~.
5. ~efinalgradi~plansshall~mplet~a~prov~p~rtoissua~eol~i~i~rm~s.
6. AS a Custom-lot subdivision, the following requirements shall be met:
a. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on~site J /
drainage facilities necessary for dewatedng all parcels to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Division prior to final map approval and priorto the issuance of grading permits.
b. Appropriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto ----/ /
or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the
Building and Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits.
c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for alewatering and protecting the subdivided ---/ /
properties, are to be installed pdor to issuance of building permits for construction upon
any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel
relative to which a building permit is requested.
d. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety ----J /
Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an
incremental or composite basis.)
e. All slope benks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses ---/ /
or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or come other
alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building
Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement
does not release the applicantJdeveldper from compliance with the slope planting
requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code.
APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE
WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
L. Dedication and Vehicular Access
1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, .__/ /
community trails, public pasecs, public landscape areas, street trees, and Fabiic drainage
facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public
facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be resenzed as shown on the plans
and/or tentative map.
2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets J /
(measured from street centedine):
total feet on
total feet on
total feet on
total leet on
3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for -foot wide roadway easement shall be made ---J /
for all private streets or ridyes.
4. Non-vehicular access shall pe dedicated to the City for the following streets: / /
5. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensudng access to all parcels by CC&Rs / /
or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or pdor to the issuance of
building permits, wl~ere no map is involved.
L
/ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIvlONGA
STAFF RF PORT
DATE: April 26, 1995
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: William J. O%leil, City Engineer
BY: Mike Olivier, Senior civil Engineer
SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 ENGINEERING'S CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS
Attached is the Executive summary of Engineering Department's FY 1995/96 Capital Improvement
Projects Budget. The summary outlines the capital projects, the funded activity, the budgeted
amount for each project and the funding source(s). The projects are categorized by the funded
activity of each project. Those activities being:
l)esign ...................... These projects generally have their initial funding in this
year. Most of the design of these projects will occur
during this year.
Design & Construction ........ These projects will be designed and consm~cted, either in
their entirety or the initial portions of the project within
the fiscal.
Construction Administration... This funding can also be considered as "cleanup" work on
a project. The construction has been completed, or
funding for construction occurred in the previous year,
and only funds for work such as soil testing, survey work,
or special inspection is required.
Reimbursements ............. These are programs for which developers, who have
agreements with the City, will be reimbursed for their
costs associated with the construction of City master
planned facilities.
Study ...................... These are special studies which are usually not directly
related to a construction project.
ITEM C
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 ENGINEERING
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
April 26, 1995
Page 2
Fiscal Year projects by type and budgeted mounts are as follows:
Beautification ....................... $293,000.
Traffic Signals ....................... $475,000.
Railroad Crossings ................... $530,000.
Street Resurfacing .................. $ 1,662,000.
Street Widening & Related Drainage...$3,561,000.
Other .............................. $209,000
Also, included is a copy of Engineefing's 7-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). This CIP is
a listing of all types of public works' projects and does not consider actual or projected annual
revenue streams for the funding sottrees.
One consequence of the reduction of development within the City is a corresponding decline for
development fees which the City takes in. Transportation, General City Drainage and Etiwanda
Drainage Fees have in the past been used to fund Engineefing's capital projects. These fees have
declined to a fraction of what was being received during the mid '80's. However, to help offset this
reduction is an increase in gas tax revenues resulting from the passage of State Proposition 111.
A second reduction to the City's capital funding sources is to the City's Transportation Development
Act (TDA) Article 8 allocation. This fund has primarily been used to fund new signal installation.
Over the past few years it has been cut significantly due to the Omnitrans/Cities funding agreement.
This agreement allows Omnitraus to appropriate TDA Article 8 money as needed with the remainder
being allocated to the Cities. Omnitrans has been replacing older buses in addition to purchasing
new buses to accommodate its expansion policies. Therefore, we do not anticipate any revenue from
this source this year or subsequent years.
Respectfully submitted,
/' j
William ~x:4YNeil
City Engineer
WJO:MO:Iy
Attachments
FY 95/96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Fiscal Year 1995/96
Capital Improvement Projects
Executive Summary
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS/MAINTENANCE
Fundinq Source
Project ID project Title Project Description Fund Title Account Amount
Desiqn
BT 95-01 19th St Parkway This project designs lhe parkway beautification B~tiiicationF~ ~iL4~j~7-9404
Beautificalion between improvemenls on 191h St. between Hermosa
Hermosa Ave. and Ave. and Haven Ave. Construction will be
Haven Ave. funded in a later year.
Total Current Year Funding $15,000
Beautitication
BT 95-02 41h Sireel Median This project will design the landscaping of the Beautification Fee 21 -4647-x~o~x $25.000
hnplovement belween existing median in 41h St. belween the west city
Ihe west city limils and limits and Haven Ave. Construclion will be
Haven Ave. funded in a later year.
Total'Current Year Funding $25,000
Beautification
BT 95-04 Base Line Rd. Median This project designs landscaping improvements Beautdicalion Fee 21-4647-xxxx $t5,000
hrlprovements at Base for the existing median at Base Line Rd. west of
Line Rd. wesl of Eliwanda Ave. Coustruction will be funded in a
Eliwanda Ave. laler year.
Total Current Year Funding $15,000
Beautification
DR 88-14 Letnon Ave. Storm Drain This project completes the design of the storm General Cily Drainage Fee 23-4637-8863 $1,000
from the Lower Alta drain syslem Io and including the podion of the
Loma Channel to system on Amethyst Ave. Construction will be
Amethyst Ave. and to funded in a laler year.
Apricot Ave. Total Current Year Funding $1,000
Drainage
RR 95-01 6lh St. Railroad Crossing This project will design the necessary Transpodation Fee 22-4637-xxxx $20,000
Improvements between improvements on 6th St. at the railroad spnr
Hermosa Ave. and between Hermosa Ave. and Archibald Ave.
Archibald Ave. Those improvements include crossing gates and
warning signals. and new crossing panels on the Total Current Year Funding $20,000
road surface. Construction will be funded in a Railroad
later year.
Capital projects I
Fundinq _Source
Projecl ID project Title Project Description Fund Title Account Amount
"'R'R' 9'~02" Baker SI. Railroad This project will design lhe railroad crossing at Transportation Fee 22-4637-xx.,<x $20,000
Crossing Improvemenls Baker SI. at the AT&SF RR. The project consists
at the AT&SF RR of widetfing roadway and adding new gates and
crossing panels. Construction of improvemenls
will be funded in a later year. Total Current Year Funding $20,000
Railroad
RR 95-03 Ebwanda Ave. Railroad This proloci will design Ihe railroad crossing TranspodationFee 22-4637-xxxx $20.000
Crossing improvements improvemenls on Etiwanda Ave. at the AT&SF
at the AT&SF RR, RR. The project consists of widening the
roadway and adding new gates and crossing
panels. Construction of improvements will be TotalCurrent Year Funding $20,000
funded in a laler year. Railroad
"'~+' 9'5:08"' Eliwanda Ave. Slreet This project designs for the widening of Etiwanda TransportaUo'n Fee 22-4637-xxxx .$20,000
Improvemenls between Ave. between the AT&SF RR to Arrow Rte. in
IheAT&SF RR Io Arrow addition to the rehabililation of the existing
CI RIo. pavement on Etiwanda Ave. Construction will
r be funded in a later year. Total Currenl Year Funding $20,000
Streels
ST 95-15 Tapia Via between Grove This podect designs street improvements which CDBG 28-4333-xxx~ $30,000
Ave. and Ranchera Dr. includes street resurracing, curb, gutlet,
sidewains, and street lights. Construction will be
funded in a later year.
Tolal Current Year Funding $30,000
Streets
TR 95-03 Arrow Rle.@ Baker SI. This project will design a traffic signal al the Transportation Fee 22-4637-xxxx $S,000
Traffic Signal Arrow Rle.@ Baker St. intersection for a laler
Improvements year installation.
Total Current Year Funding $5,000
Traffic
TR 95-04 Base Line Rd. @ 1-15 This project designs for a traffic signal at the TranspodationFee 22-4637-xxxx $10.000
Traflic Signal Base Line Rd. @ 1-15 intersection for a later year
Improvements installation.
Total Current Year Funding $10,000
Traffic
Design Total; }181,000
)2
Fundinq Source
Project ID Project Title project Description Fund Title Account Amount
Design ,& Construction
BT 95-03 Archibald Parkway This will design and construct parkway B~'tification ~:e~
Beautitication between landscaping on Archibald Ave. between 41h St.
4th SI. and Base Line and Base Line Rd.
Rd.
Total Current Year Funding $162,500
Beautification
BT 95-05 Etiwanda Cobblestone at Construction of cobblestone at various locations Beautdication Fee 21-4647-8822 $25,000
various localions on Eliwanda Ave.
Total 'Current Year Funding $25,000
Beautdication
BT 95-06 Northeast Park - East This project designs and constructs a podion of 1988 conservation Bond Act 27-4532-8924 $214,400
side of EaslAve, and the Nollheasl Park Public Resources Grant 344532-8924 $190.600
C') 0o|11r of Sunlmit Ave.
_~ LMD 7 - North Etiwanda 47-4130-xxxx $442,470
Total Current Year Funding $847,470
Beautification
RR 95-04 Rochester Ave. Railroad This project will design and constrnct Transpodation Fee 22-4637-xxxx $450,000
Crossing hnprovemenls improvements on Rochester Ave. at the AT&SF
at the AT&SF RR. RR. Improvements will include the widening of
the crossing including warning signals and
concrete paReIs. Total Current Year Funding $450,000
Railroad
ST 95-14 9lh St. streel This project design and constructs streel CDBG 2a-4333-9316 $264.000
improvements between improvements consisting of street resuffacing,
Grove Ave. and Edwin curb, gutter, sidewalks, and sireel lights.
Ave.
Total Current Year Funding $264,000
Streets
Cap~l~l Proleers 3
Fund n~l Source
Project ID project T t e Project Description Fund Title Account Amount
ST 95-12 Alpine/Ramona This project is in conjunction with the Rancho TDAAnicle3 16-4637-x.xxx $25,000
Sidewalks adjacenl Io the Cucamonga Neighborhood Center and will be
Rancho Cncamonga designing and constructing sidewalks on nearby Gas Tax [Measure l] 32-4637-xxxx $10,000
Neighborhood Center streets.
Total Current Year Funding $35,000
Streets
ST 95-11 Arrow Rte. Sireel This projecl designs and construcls an addilional Gas Tax [Measure I1 32-4637-xxxx $10(~,0~3~
ImprovemenlSbelWeen westbound lane along with rehabilitating the
Milliken Ave. and the existing pavemenl on Arrow Rte. belween
railroad spur wesl of Milliken Ave. and the railroad spur west of
Milliken Ave. Milliken Ave. Total Current Year Funding $100,000
Streets
ST 94-01 Beryl St. Street This project designs and constructs the widening TDA AHicle 3 16-4637-9402 $51,000
hnprovements between of Beryl St. between Base Line Rd. and 19th St. Gas Tax [Measure I) 32-4637*xxxx $17,000
Base Line Rd. and 19th
Total Cufrent Year Funding $68,000
C~ Streets
ST 88-46 Carnelian St. Streel and This project will design and construct a major ISTEA 24-4637-9314 $2,250,000
Storm Drain storm drain in Carnelian St. between San Gas Tax [Measure l) 32-4637-9314 $250.000
Improvemenls between Bernardtrio Rd. and Base Line Rd. In addition
San Beroardino Rd and the curve on Carnelian St, will be realigned
Base Line Rd. along with rehabililating the exisling pavemenl Total Current Year Funding $2,500,000
on that street. streets
ST 95-04 East Ave. Street This project designs and constructs new Gas Tax [2105} (Prop 111) 10-4637-x~x $25,000
Improvements adjacent pavement to the backbone width (or one travel Air Quality Improvement Grant 14-4158-xxxx $75,000
to the fulure Northeast lane in each direction) on East Ave. adjacent to
Community Park. the future Nodheast Communily Park. In
addilion, the projecIs will rehabilitate the existing Total Current Year Funding $100,000
pavement from lhe park to Summit Ave. Streets
Development will be responsible for the
remaining widening and improvements.
ST 95-07 East Ave. Streel This project designs and constructs new TranspoRation Fee 22-4637-xxxx $310,000
Improvemeots between pavement to the backbone width (or one travel
Highland Ave. and lane in each direction) on East Ave, between
Victoria St. Highland Ave. and Vicloria St. Developmenl will
be responsible for Ihe renl9iRiRg widening and Total Current Year Funding $310,000
improvements. Streels
4
Capital P~uje~
Fundinq Source
Project ID Project Title project Description Fund Title Account Amount
ST95-06 East Ave Street This project designs and constructs new ' ~'~;t~i~'Fe~"~L,~:;~x'
hnprovements belween pavement to lhe backbone width (or one travel
Summit Ave. and lane in each direction) on East Ave. between
Highland Ave. Summit Ave. and Highland Ave. Development
will be responsible for Ihe remaining widening Total Current Year Funding $300,000
and improvements. Streets
ST 95-10 Haven Ave. Street This project designs and constructs lhe Gas Tax (Measure I] 32-4637-~x $395,~0
hnprovements between rehabilitation of the existing pavement on Haven se 140 35-4637-x~ $35,000
Base Line Rd. and Ave. between Base Line Rd. and Wilson Ave.
Wilson Ave,
Total Current Year Funding $430,000
Streets
ST 95-09 Hermosa Ave. Street This project designs and constructs the Gas Tax (MeaSure I] 32-4637-~ $270,000
Rehab. hnprovements rehabilitation of the existing pavement on SB~40 35-4637-~ $25,~0
between 4th St. and Hermosa Ave. between 4th St. and Foothill
~ Foothill Blvd. Blvd
Tetal Current Year Funding $295,000
~ Streets
ST 95-02 Jersey Blvd Street This project designs and constructs the widening Gas Tax12105] (Prop. 111) 10-4637-~x $250,000
Improvements between and the rehabilitation of Jersey Blvd. between Gas TaxiMeasure I] 32-4637-~xx $330,000
Haven Ave. and the Haven Ave. and the railroad spur east of Haven
railroad spur east of Ave. The project widens Jersey Blvd. on lhe se 140 35-4637-x~ $25,000
Haven Ave. nodh side and rehabilitates the existing Telal Current Year Funding $605,000
pavement. Streets
ST 95-01 Local Slreet Rehab. at This designs and constructs pavement Gas Tax1210S)iProp H~) 10-46~7-~1~ $400,000'
various locations rehabilitation projects at various locations
lhroughout the city.
Total Current Year Funding $400,000
Streets
ST95-03 SummitAve. Street This project will design and construct the Gas Tax i2105] (Prop111) 10-4637-~ ,$25,000
hnprovements between rehabilitation of Summit Ave between East Ave.
East Ave. to approx. to approx. 1200' easl of East Ave.
1200' east of East Ave.
Total Current Year Funding $25,000
Streets
Capdal Prolect~ 5
Fundinq ~ource
Project ID Project Title project Description Fund Title Account Amount
"'~+'95Z0~'' Wheelchair Ramps at This project designs and constructs ramps for TDA~ticle~ 16-4637-x.xxx $4.000
various locations the disabled at various locations throughout the
cily.
Total Current Year Funding $4,000
Streets
ST 88-33 Wilson Ave. @ Archibald This project designs and constructs street Gas Tax [Measure I] 32-4637-xxxx
Ave. Streel improvements on Wilson Ave. @ Archibald Ave.
hnprovetnents Improvements include street widening and
adding sidewalks and drainage improvements.
TQIal Current Year Funding $50,000
Streets
"'T~'9~-'05"' 4th St. @ Milliken Ave. This project designs and installs a traffic signal at TransportatiOn Fee 22-4637-xxxx $100,000
Traffic Signal the 41h St. @ Milliken Ave. intersection. Funding ontario $10o,0o0
Improvemenls for this project is shared joinfly with the City of
~ Onlario,
-----" Totat Current Year Funding $200,000
~ Traffic
"'+R'9~-~i' Church St. @ Milliken This projecl will design and install a traffic signal Transpodation Fee 22-4637-xxxx $130,000
Ave. Traffic Signal at the Church St. @ Milliken Ave. intersection.
Improvements
Total Current Year Funding $130,000
Traffic
TR 95-02 Victoria Park Lane @ This project designs and installs a traffic signal at Transportafion Fee 22-4637-xxxx $130,000
Milliken Ave. Traffic the Victoria Park Lane @ Milliken Ave.
Signal Improvements intersection.
Total Current Year Funding $130,000
Traffic
Design & Construction Total: ~7,4301970
Capital )6
Fundinq Source
Project ID Project Title Project Description Fund Title Account Amount
Construction Administration
"'R'R'93-10 MetrolinkStation& This funding is for lhe completion of the 36-4637-9326 $69,100
Facilities Metroliok Slation aud relaled Facilities.
Total Current Year Funding $69,100
Railroad
Constructiou Administration Total: ~69,100
Capital Prolects 7
Fundinq .Source
Project ID project Title project Description Fund Title Account Amount
Reimbursements
MP 95-02 Developer This item provides funds from various sources Eliwanda Drabsage Fee 19-4637-9120 $10,000
Reilllburselnents for the reimbnrsement to developers of master Transportation Fee 22-4637-9120 $100.000
planned street or drainage facilities.
General City Drainage Fee 23-4637-9120 $30,000
Total Current Year Funding $140,000
Master Plan
Reimbursements Total: J,1/40,000
Capilal Pioj 8
Fundinq Source
Project ID Project Title project Description Fund Title Account Amount
Study
MP 95-01 Ctlcalnonga, Deer, and This study performs an annual npdate of the General CityDrainageFee 23-4637-8785 $1,000
Day Creeks Masler Plan master plan of drainage for ihe area of lhe City
of Drainage west of Eliwanda.
Total Current Year Funding $1,000
Master Plan
ST 95-13 Pavement Management This funds the annual update of the city-wide Gas Tax12105} (Prop. 111) 10-4637-9110 $2.000
Prograin pavement management program inventory.
Total'Current Year Funding $2,000
Streets
Study Total: }3,000
Cap~t,=l PIolects 9
SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
I~0~};P~PE INAME [LOCATION I FY 94-95[ FY 95-96[ FY 96-97[ FY 97-98~ FY 9s-qgl FY 99-001 FY 00-01~
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PROJECTS
~ ~'MTDIST AD82-01R JERSEYBLVD(SD) FROM $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
VINCENT/EASTVVARD
95 ASMT DIST AD 86-02 ALTA LOMA BASINS $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
EXCAVATION
TOTAL $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
I~A(;E I 04/13/95
SEVEN IPROVMENT PROGRAM
~N~'[TYPE tNAME ILOCATION [ FY 94-951 FY 95-961 FY 96-97[ FY 97-981 FY 98-991 FY 99-001 FY 00-01}
II BEAUTIFICATION PROJECTS
21 BEUT 19TH ST AMBER TO BERYL $0 $0 $0 $6,000 $60,000 $6,000 $0
PARKVVAy IMPROVEMENT
21 BEUT 19TH ST HERMOSA TO HAVEN $0 $15,000 $6 $128,000 $12,000 $0
PARKWAy IMPROVEMENT
21 BEUT 19TH ST JASPER TO WIO CARNELIAN $0 $0 $5,000 $48,000 $5,000 $0 $0,
PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT
21 9EUT 19TH ST i/rIO ARCHIBALD TO HERMOSA $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $155,000 $10,000 $C
PARKVVAY IMPROVEMENT
21 9EUT 19TH ST ~/IO BERYL TO AMETHYST AVE $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $139,000 $0
PARKVVAY IMPROVEMENT
21 3EUT 19TH ST /VEST CITY LIMITS $6! $0; $10,000, $175,000 $10,000 $0 $0
ENTRY MONUMENT
21 :~EUT ~ITH ST VlEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS $(3 $C $C $0 $0 $0 $0
21 3EUT 5TH ST 3UFFALO TO CHARLES SMITH $C $C $C $12,500 $125,000 $12,500 $0
VlEDIAN IMPROVEMENT
21 BEUT $TH ST HAVEN TO MILLIKEN $C $0 $C $24,000 $240,000 $24,000 $0
MEDIAN IMPROVEMENT
21 BEUT STH ST. HAVEN TO MILLIKEN $C $0 $24,000 $240,000 $24,000 $0 $0
MEDIAN IMPROVEMENTS
21 BEUT ARCHIBALD AVE BANYAN TO WILSON $0 $25.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
PARKSNAY IMPROVMENTS
21 BEUT ARCHIBALD AVE CANDLEWOOD TO PALO ALTO $0 $0 $1.500 $15.000 $1,500 $0 $0
EAST SIDE PARKWAY
21 BEUT ARCHIBALD AVE PARKXqAYS $0 $0 $162,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
21 BEUT ARCHIBALD AVE S/O CHURCH TO CHURCH $0 $0 $1,250 $12,500 $1,250 $0 $0
WEST SIDE PARKWAY
;'1 BEUT ARROW RTE BEAUTIFICATION STUDY $0 $O $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0
WEST CITY LIMITS TO HAVEN
Zl BEUT ARROW RTE CITY ENTRY MONUMENT $0 $0 $0 $6 $0 $20,000 $200,000
AT EAST CITY LIMITS
Zl BEUT ARROW RTE CiTY ENTRY MONUMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $20.000 $0 $175,000
AT WEST CITY LIMITS
Z 1 BEUT ARROW RTE HELLMAN TO HAVEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0
VARIOUS PARKWAYS
21 BEUT BANYAN ST BERYL TO W/O HELLMAN $0 $0 $5,000 $55,000 $0 $0 $0
NORTH SIDE
PAGE 2 04/I 3/95
SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
FUND PIPE NAME LOCATION FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 97-98 FIt' 98-99 FY 99-00 FY 00-01
21 BEUT BANYAN ST HELLMAN TO AMETHYST $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,800 $0 $(1
PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT
21 BEUT BANYAN ST E/O KIRKWOOD TO AMETHYST $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $40,000 $(]
SOUTH SIDE
21 BEUT BASE LINE RD BEAUTIFICATION STUDY $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $(3
MILLIKEN TO EAST CITY LIMITS
21 BEUT BASE LINE RD CITY ENTRY MONUMENT $0 $0 $0 $17,000 $180.000 $0
EAST CITY LIMITS
21 BEUT BASE LINE RD HAVEN TO MILLIKEN $0 $15.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $(]
MEDIAN IMPROVEMENT
21 BEUT BASE LINE RD WEST CITY LIMITS $O $0 $0 $50.000 $0 $0 $(]
TO HAVEN AVE
21 3EUT BERYL AVE BANYAN TO MANZANITA $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $44,000
EAST SIDE PARKWAY
21 ~EUT BERYL AVE MANZANITA TO S/O HILLSIDE $O $0 $0 $0 $4,000 $40,000 $(3
WEST SIDE PARKWAY
21 3EUT CARNELIAN AVE BANYAN TO BEECHWOOD $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 $40,000 $40,000
WEST SIDE PARKWAY
21 3EUT CARNELIAN AVE VINEYARD TO BASE LINE $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $0
PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT
21 BEUT CARNELIAN AVE STUDY - VINEYARD TO $0 $O $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $(]
NORTH CITY LIMITS
21 3EUT CHERRY AVE CITY ENTRY MONUMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,000 $0 $0
AT SOUTH CITY LIMITS
21 3EUT CHURCH ST BEAUTIFICATIONSTUDY $0 $0 $0 $45.000 $0 $0 $0
21 3EUT CHURCH ST CITY ENTRY MONUMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $0 $0
AT EAST CITY LIMITS
21 5EUT CHURCH ST HELLMAN TO E/O HELLMAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $5.500 $20,000 $35,000
PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT
21 5EUT ETIWANDAAVE CITY ENTRY MONUMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $110.000 $110,000
SOUTH CITY LIMITS
21 3EUT ETIWANDACURB COBBLESTONE CURB $0 $25,000 $25.000 $25.000 $25.000 $25,000 $25,000
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
21 3EUT HAVEN AVE BASE LINE TO VICTORIA $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $115,000 $115,000
PARKWAYS
21 3EUT HAVEN AVE CARRARI TO HIDDEN FARM $0 $0 $4,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0
WEST SIDE PARKWAY
21 3EUT HAVEN AVE DEER CREEK TO N/O CHURCH $0 $0 $10,000 $130.000 $0 $O $0
WEST SIDE PARKWAY
21 ~EUT HAVEN AVE HIGHLAND TO BANYAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0
PARKWAYS
PAGE 3 04/I 3/95
SEVEN ¥ IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
FUND TYPE NAME LOCATION FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 99-00 FY 00-01
21 BEUT HAVEN AVE N/O CHURCH TO BASE LINE $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $320,000 $20.000 $0
WEST SIDE PARKWAY
21 BEUT HAVEN AVE WILSON TO HILLSIDE $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500 $0 $0
WEST SIDE PARKWAY
21 BEUT HELLMAN AVE FOOTHILL TO BASE LINE $0 $0 $0 $180,000 $180,000 $0 $0
21 BE_UT HERMOSA AVE BEAUTIFICATION STUDY $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25.000 $0
21 BEUT HERMOSA AVE FROM ESTACIA TO CHURCH $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0
AND SPRR TO VICTORIA
21 BEUT HIGHLAND AVEV CITY ENTRY MONUMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0
EAST CITY LIMITS
2~ BEUT MILLIKEN AVE CITY ENTRY MONUMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 $310,000
ON WEST SIDE AT 4TH
21 BEUT SAN BERNARDINO SPINEL TO HELLMAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000 $0
SOUTH SIDE PARKWAY
21 BEUT SAPPHIRE ST ~/ICARA TO WHIRLAWAY $0 $0 $3,300 $33,00{: $3.300 $0
21 BEUT IARIOUS LOC FRAIL RE i I<OFITS $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,00(:
21 BEUT ~/INEYARD AVE STUDY - SOUTH CITY LIMITS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
~O CARNELIAN
tOTAL BEAUTIFICATION $0 $80,000 $276,050 $1,380,000 $1,586.850 $820,500 $1.035,000
PAGE 4 04/I 3/95
SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPI~,OVMENT PROGRAM
IFUND ITYPE INAME ILOCATION I FY 94-951 FY 95-961 FY 96-971 FY 97-981 FY 98-991 FY 99-001 FY 00-011
III RAIL ROAD PROJECTS
22 RR ~,TH ST ~T & SF RR SPURR $10 $O $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $25,000
E/O SANTA ANITA
22 RR 3TH ST ~T & SF RR SPURR $~0 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $245,000 $35,000 $0
/VIO HERMOSA
22,OT RR 3AKER AVE 5,T & SFRR AT 8TH ST $(~ $20,000 $30.000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0
22,OT RR -'_TIWANDA AVE ~.T & SF RR $0 $20,000 $400.000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0
SIO ARROW RTE
22 RR '~ELLMAN AVE SO PAC RR SIO $(] $0 $0 $0 $125;000 $170,000 $170,000
~ASE LINE RD
22 RR :~,MONA AVE SO PAC RR N/O $0 $0 $0 $27,000 $250,000 $0 $0
3ASE LINE RD
22,OT RR :tOCHESTER AVE ~T & SFRR AT 8TH ST. $0 $450.000 $0 $0 $0 $O $0
FOTAL RAILRAODPROJECTS $0 $510.000 $450,000 $377.000 $620,000 $235.000 $195,000
PAGE 5 04/13/95
SEVEN 'AL IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
INAME ILOCATION I FY 94-951 FY 95-961 FY 96-971 FY 97-981 FY 98-99t FY 99-001 FY 00-01
IV STORM DRAIN PROJECTS
~3_' SD 8TH ST CUCAMONGA CHANNEL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50.000 $500,000
TO BAKER
~3 S~D AMETHYST AVE HELLMAN TO S/O 19TH $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,00_0 $200,000 $0
RDA __ SD ARCHIBALD AVE 4TH ST - FROM ARCHIBALD $450,000 $0 $0; $0 $0 $0
TO 1200 FEET EAST
23 SD ARCHIBALD AVE 8TH ST LATERAL FROM $0 $0 $14,00(~ $184.000 $23.000 $0
ARCHIBALD TO RAMONA
23 SD ARCHIBALD AVE NIO AT&SF RR TO DEVON $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90.000 $990,000
AND EAST ON DEVON
RDA SD ARCHIBALD AVE DEER CREEK TO FERON $4,000,000 $(~ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
23 SD ~,RCHIBALD AVE SPRR AND AT MONTE VISTA $0 $(~ $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0
GUCAMONGA STORM DRAIN
23 SD ~RROW RTE E/O ROCHESTER TO M~LUKEN $0 $8 $450,000 $450,000 $0 $0 $0
19 SD ~.RROW RTE LOWER ETIWANDA CHANNEL $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $275,000 $0
~,ND EAST ON ARROW RTE
19 ~D ~T & SF RR ETIWANDA CH TO WIO $0 $0 $0 $15,750 $157,500 $15.750 $0
ETIWANDA AVE
23 SD 3ASE LINE RD -Z/O DAY CREEK CHANNEL $8 $0 $0 $220.000 $220,000 $0 $0
C-~ ro DAY CREEK BLVD.
23 SD 3ERYL AVE _EMON TO N/O WILSON AVE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $920,000
23 SD 3ERYL AVE N/O 19TH ST TO LEMON AVE $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 ~520,O00 $520,000
23 SD '~'ARNELIAN AVE 19TH - CARNELIAN TO JASPER $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $220,000 $220.000
NORTH ON JASPER TO HIGHLAND
23 SD CARNELIAN AVE 19TH TO ORANGE (PHASE 4B) $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $220,000 $220.000
23 SD CARNELIAN AVE IN ORANGE - CARNELIAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0
TO JASPER
Z3 SD CARNELIAN AVE ORANGE TO BANYAN AND $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0
WEST ON BANYAN
23 SD CARNELIAN AVE WEST BRANCH EXTENSION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,00~ $0
NORTH TO ALMOND
~3 SD CARNELIAN CHAN EAST BRANCH EXTENSION NORT $0 $0 $0 $0 $70.000 $0 $0
NORTH TO DEBRIS BASIN
23 SD CHURCH ST DAY CREEK CHANNEL TO $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,00(~ $220.000 $220,000
VICTORIA LOOP
23 SD CHURCH ST DAY CREEK CHANNEL $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,00(~ $175,000 $200,000
AND WEST 800 FEET
23 SD CUCAMONGA SD E/O CARNELIAN TO HELLMAN $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $2,100,000 $2.100,000 $0
19 SD EAST AVE FROM FOOTHILL TO $0 $0 $230,000 $1.000,000 $1,000,000 $0
VICTORIA AVE - PHASE 1
PAGE 6 04/I 3/95
SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
FUND TYPE NAME LOCATION FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 99-00 FY 00-01
19 SD =TIWANDA AVE 4TH TO ARROW RTE $0 $0 $0 $250.000 $2,500,000 $250,000 $0
AND WEST ON 6TH ST
19 SD iETIWANDA CHAN 4TH TO ARROW RTE $0 $0 $0 $6 $285,000 $0 $0
23 SD aFOOTHILL BLVD ARCHIBALD TO DEER CREEK $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $1,320,00il
CHANNEL WITH LATERALS
19 SD FOOTHILL BLVD N EAST AVE TO ETIWANDA AND $0 $0 $130,000 $1,300,000 $130,000 $0 $0
NORTH ON ETIWANDA TO RTE 15
23 SD H__AVEN AVE ALTA LOMA BASINS TO WILSON $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $440,000~
23 SD HAVEN AVE HIGHLAND TO ALTA LOMA BASIN~ $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $440.000;
23 SD HELLMAN AVE CUCAMONGA CHANNEL TO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250.000 $250,00~
FOOTHILL BLVD AND SPRR
23 SD HELLMAN AVE FROM 19TH ST TO LEMON $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $6 $0 $G
23 SD HELLMAN AVE IN ARROW RTE FROM HELLMAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $(~
WEST 1200 FEET
23 SD HERMOSA AVE 6TH ST $0 $0 $0 $0 $25.000 $0 $0
23 SD HERMOSA AVE 8TH ST $0 $6 $0 $0 $25.000 $0 $(]
;~3 SD HERMOSA AVE ALTA LOMA BASINS TO WILSON $0 $0 $0 $0 $6 $0 $75.00i3
EAST ON WILSON
23 SD HERMOSA AVE DEER CREEK TO 8TH ST $0 $0 $0 $0 $220.000 $0 $0i
23 SD HIGHLAND AVE LOWER ALTA LOMA CHANNEL $0 $0 $10,O00 $570,000 $0 $0 $(3
TO ARCHIBALD AVE
23 SD LEMON AVE ALTA LOMA CHAN TO AMETHYST $0 $1.000 $2.000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
NORTH ON AMETHYST TO APRICC l'
19 SD MILLER AVE EAST AVE TO 1300 FT $0 $0 $26,000 $260,000 $26,000 $0 $0
WIO EAST AVE
.~3 SD RAMONA AVE MONTE VISTA TO SPRR $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $200,000 $200,000
EAST IN SPRR TO HERMOSA
~3 SD RANCHO WASH NIO DEMENS CHAN TO $0 $0 $0 $6 $6 $60,000 $6
NIO ALMOND AVE
~3 SD SAPPHIRE ST DEMENS CHANNEL TO $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $6 $0
ROSEBUD - PHASE 1
~3 SO SAPPHIRE ST ROSEBUD TO HILLSIDE $0 $0 $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0
PHASE 2
-)3 SD VICTORIA LAKES EAST OF DAY CREEK CHANNEL $0 $0 $0 $0 $30.000 $0 $0
19 SD WHITTRAM AVE LOWER ETIWANDA CHANNEL $0 $0 $0 $6 $0 $26.000 $250,000
TO 1300 FEET EAST
23 SD WILSON AVE CHAFFEY COLLEGE TO CANISTAL $0 $0 $6 $56,000 $616.000 $0 $0
TOTAL STROM DRAIN PROJECTS $4,450.000 $1,000 $2.860,000 $4,420,750 $8,157,500 $5,256,750 $6.765,000
PAGE 7 04/13/95
SEV IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
]FUND ]TYPE ]NAME ]LOCATION ] FY 94-95~ FY 95-961 FY 96-97~ FY 97-981 FY 98-991 FY 99-001 FY 00-011
V TRAFFIC SIGNAL PROJECTS
12 OT SIGNAL 19TH ST qERMOSA CITY 112 AND $180.00(: $C $0 $0 $0 $0 $8
2ALTRANS 1/2 OF COST
22 SIGNAL 19TH ST NYO~PALM $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $182.500 $0 $8
22,OT SIGNAL 19TH ST JASPER CITY 1/2 AND $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $176,008
CALTRANS 1/2 OF COST
22 SIGNAL ;6TH ST BUFFALO $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $170,500 $8
22 SIGNAL 6TH ST CLEVELAND $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $6 $176,000 $0
22 SIGNAL ARCHIBALD AVE 7TH ST $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $170,500 $0 $0
12 SIGNAL ARCHIBALD AVE 8TH ST $165,000 $0 $0 $0 · $0 $0 $0
22 SIGNAL ARCHIBALD AVE SAN BERNARDINO RD $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
22 SIGNAL ARCHIBALD AVE VICTORIA $0 $0 $6.500 $154,000 $0 $0 $0
22 SIGNAL ARCHIBALD AVE WILSON $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $154,500 $0 $0
22 SIGNAL ARROW RTE BAKER $0 $5,000 $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $0
22 SIGNAL ARROW RTE ETIWANDA $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
22 SIGNAL ARROW RTE GROVE $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $132.000 $0 $0
12 SIGNAL ARROW RTE WHITE OAK $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
22 SIGNAL BASE LINE RD DAY CREEK BLVD $0 $6 $0 $242,000 $0 $0 $0
1 LOT SIGNAL BASE LINE RD EAST AVE - CITY 3/4 AND $246,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FONTANA 114 SHARE OF COST
22 SIGNAL BASE LINE RD 1-15 RAMPS ON WEST SIDE $0 $10,000 $276,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
CALTRANS 1/2 & CITY 1/2 COSTS
22 SIGNAL CARNELIAN AVE MONTE VISTA (AVALON) $0 $0 $0 $0 $6.500 $0 $159,500
22 ;IGNAL CARNELIAN AVE VIVERO $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $154,000 $0
22 SIGNAL CARNELIAN AVE WILSON $6 $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $154,000 $0
22 SIGNAL CHURCH ST RAMONA $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $0
22 SIGNAL CHURCH ST SPRUCE ST $0 $0 $193,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
12,58 ;IGNAL CHURCH ST TERRA VISTA PARKWAY $193,820 $O $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
32 SIGNAL CITY VARIOUS - $0 $50,000 $50.000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $0
SIGNAL COORDINATION
22 SIGNAL EAST AVE MILLER $0 $0 $6 $0 $6,500 $0 $176,000
22 SIGNAL EAST AVE VICTORIA $0 $0 $0 $6,500 $0 $159,50C $0
22 SIGNAL ETIWANDAAVE MILLER $0 $0 $0 $0 $6.500 $C $180,000
12.OT SIGNAL FOOTHILL BLVD RAMONA - CITY 112 $180,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $(3 $0
AND CALTRANS 1/2
12,OT SIGNAL FOOTHILL BLVD BAKER ST - CITY 113 AND $180.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $C $0
CALTRANS 2./3 OF COST
22 SIGNAL HAVEN AVE TRADEMARK ST $0 $0 $0 $0 $G $C $205,00~0
22 SIGNAL HAVEN AVE VALENCIA $0 $6 $182,500 $_0 $(3 $6 $0
22 ;IGNAL HAVEN AVE WILSON $0 $0 $0 $193.~00 $C $C $0
PAGE 8 04/I 3/95
SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
[FUND YYPE NAME LOCATION FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 97-91 FY 98-99 FY 99-0( FY 00-0l
~22 SIGNAL HELLMAN AVE 9TH ST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7.000 $190.0(,I
22 SIGNAL HELLMAN AVE CHURCH ST $0 $0 $0 $185.000 $0 $0 $~1
22 SIGNAL HELLMAN AVE SAN BERNARDINO RD $0 $0 $6 $180.000 $6 $0 S0
22 SIGNAL HERMOSA AVE 4TH ST - CITY 1/2 $0 $0 $218.000 $6 $0 $6 $(~
AND ONTARIO 1/2 OF COST
22 SIGNAL HERMOSA AVE CHURCH $0 $6 $6.500 $170.500 $0 $0 $(]
22 SIGNAL HERMOSA AVE HIGHLAND AVE $0 $6 $6,500 $0 $0 $176,000 $,
22 SIGNAL HERMOSA AVE LEMON $6 $0 $0 $6.500 $0 $170.500 $0
22 SIGNAL HERMOSA AVE WILSON $0 $0 $6.500 $0 $0 $0 $176.00~
22 SIGNAL HIGHLAND AVE LEMON AVE $6 $0 $6 $6 $184.000 $0 $n
22 SIGNAL MILLIKEN AVE 4TH ST CITY 1/2 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $6 S0
AND ONTARIO 1/2 OF COST
22 SIGNAL MILLIKEN AVE 6TH ST $193.500 $6 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
22 SIGNAL MILLIKEN AVE ARROVV RTE $215.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6 $8
22 SIGNAL MILLIKEN AVE BANYAN AVE $0 $0 $0 $0 $6.500 $176.000 $0
22 SIGNAL MILLIKEN AVE CHURCH $0 $130.000 $0 $0 $6 $0 $0
22 ISIGNAL MILLIKEN AVE FOOTHILL BLVD $100.000 $0 $0 $6 $0 $6 ${~
22 SIGNAL MIlLLIKEN AVE JERSEy $193.500 $6 $0 $6 $0 $0 $8
22 SIGNAL NILLIKEN AVE MOUNTAIN VIEVV $0 $6 $6.500 $180.000 $0 $0 St)
22 SIGNAL VlILLIKENAVE PARK $0 $0 $6 $6.500 $0 $180.000 S0
22 SIGNAL rilLLIKEN AVE TERRA VISTA PIGNY $177,000 $0 $0 $0 $6 $6i $0
22 SIGNAL VIILLIKENAVE ~/IC'rORIA PARK LANE $0 $130,000 $0 $0 $0 SO $0
22 SIGNAL ~OCHESTER AVE CHURCH ST $0 $6 $6 $6,500 $176,000 S0 $0
22 SIGNAL ~OCHESTER AVE ~/ICTORIA PARK LANE $0 $6 $6.500 $0 $176.000 $0 $0
12 SIGNAL SPRUCE AVE )'ERRA VISTA PARKSNAY $6 $6 $6.500 $6 $0 $0 $187.000
tOTAL SIGNAL PROJECTS $2.343.820 $425.000 $1.065.00(3 $1.572.000 $1,264.500 $1.580.000 $1.449.500
PAGE 9 04/I 3/95
SEVEN ¥ IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
[FUND ~TYPE [NAME fLOCATION [ FY 94-95[ FY 95-96[ FY 96-97[ FY 97-98[ FY 98-99[ FY 99-00[ FY 00-01
VI STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
]2 STREET 4TH ST, E/O I-15 TO ETIWANDA - NO SIDE $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $C $0 $0
32 STREET 4TH ST HAVEN AVE TO E/O 1-15 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $(~ $0 $0
Z2,OT STREET 4TH ST HAVEN TO WEST CITY LIMITS $335,000 $0 $0 $0 $6 $6 $0
NORTH SIDE
33 STREET 6TH ST CHARLES SMITH TO ETIVVANDA $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $0 $2,000,000
33 STREET 6TH ST CLEVELAND TO MILLIKEN $0 $0 $30.000 $300,000 $30,000 $0 $0
10,32 STREET 6TH ST CUCAMONGACHANNEL $0 $0 $0 $0 $78.000 $330.000 $0
TO HELLMAN SOUTH SIDE
'10,32 STREET 6TH ST CUCAMONGACREEK $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,000 $470,000
WIDEN BRIDGE
10,32 STREET 6TH ST DEER CREEK CHAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 $0 $450,000
WIDEN BRIDGE
83 STREET 6TH ST E/O BUFFALO TO ROCHESTER $0 $0 $0 $560,000 $250,000 $0 $0
SOUTH SIDE
10,32 STREET 6TH ST HAVEN TO DEER CREEK BRIDGE $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $550,000 $0
10,32 STREET 6TH ST HELLMAN TO ARCHIBALD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $270,000
SOUTH SIDE
10,32 STREET 6TH ST LUCAS RANCH RD TO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $495,000
DEER CREEK CHANNEL
10,32 STREET BTH ST ROCHESTER CT. TO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $385,000
CHARLES SMITH - SOUTH SIDE
10,32 STREET 5TH ST UTICA TO CLEVELAND $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $305,000
NORTH SIDE
10,32 STREET 7TH ST CENTER TO AT & SFRR SPURR $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,500 $137,500 $0
NORTH SIDE
10,32 ~TREET 7TH ST CLEVELAND TO MILLIKEN $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $0 $0 $0
10,32 ~TREET 8TH ST ARCHIBALD TO HAVEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $55,000 $473,000 $0
10.32 ~TREET &THST CUCAMONGACREEKTO $0 $0 $20.000 $50,000 $170.000 $0 $0
iNIO VINEYARD AVE
10.32 ;TREET BTH ST )EER CREEK CHAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0
INIDEN BRIDGE
10,32 ;TREET ;TH ST GROVE TO BAKER $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0
NORTH SIDE
10,32 .TREET ,TH ST HELLMAN TO ARCHIBALD $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $0
32 ,TREET ~TH ST MADRONE TO WIO BAKER $0 $0 $15.000 $115,000 $0 $0
28 T CDBG ~TH ST ;ROVE TO EDWIN $930 $264,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $u
16,32 TREET ~,LPINE/RAMONA AT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER $0 $35.000 $0 $0 $0 $0
10 TREET ~,METHYST AVE BASE LINE RD TO 19TH $0 $0 $0 $610,00(] $0 $0
32 TREET ~qETHYSTAVE FROMHILLSIDETOALMOND $0 $0 $25,000 $122,000 $220,000 $0 $0!
PAGE 10 04/I3/95
SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
FUNI5 TYPE ~ N~E LOCATION FY 94-9~ FY 95-9~ FY 96-9~ FY 97-96 FY 98-9~ FY 99-0T FY 00-0~
32 STRE~ET~ ~VIETHy~ST AVE :ROM NIO WILSON TO $'~ ~ $(] ~ $~ ' $20.00~ $~ 50,00~ ~$30,000
S/O HILLSIDE - WEST SIDE
32,34 STREET~ 'ARC~HIBA~LD_AV__E ~T 4TH STREET '$176.0~ ~ $~ ~6 ~ $0 ~ $~ ~ /6 ~
10.32 STREET___ _AR~CHI~BAL__DAV~E !SIO BANYAN TO HILLSIDE $0 ~ $0 $6 $300.000 $300,000 $300,00~
16.32 STREET ARCHIBALD AVE MONTE VISTA TO 200 FT SOUTH ~ $~ ' ~ ~ $14.00~ $0 $~ ~ ST ~ $0
I0 STREET ARROW RTE ETIVVANDA TO EAST ~ $~ ST ~ ST ~ $0 ~$38,00~ ~ ST ~
CII'f LIMITS
32~ STREET ARROW RTE MILLIKEN AVE TO RR SPURR ~ $~ $100,00~ $0 '~ $~ ~ $0 ~
'10 STREET ARROWRTE GROVE TO BAKER -- $~ $0~ $6' $40,0~0~ $400,00~ $1,460,000
32 S~i~i:i:i ARROWRTE ROCHE~Sli:RTOi.15 $0 $0 $30,000 $300,000 $30.000 $0
22 S i nl:~: 1 BAKER AVE AT & SFRR TO 8TH ST $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $220,000
WEST SIDE
32 5~ I BANYAN ST CABARNET TO W/O MILLIKEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000 $300,00f)
22,35 STREET BASE LINE RD VICTORIA PARK LN TO $400,000 $6 $6 $0 $6 $0 $0
E/O DEER CREEK CHAN
16 STREET BERYL AVE BASE LINE RD TO 19TH ST $0 $68,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
WEST SIDE (SIDEWALKS)
10,32 STREET BERYL AVE MANZANITA TO S/O HILLSIDE $0 $0 $6 $40.000 $0 $462.000 $0
28 ST CDBG CALAVARES NINTH TO ARROW RTE $184,500 $0 $6 $0 $0 $0, $0
28 ST CDBG CALLE VEJAR AVENIDA LEON TO HELLMAN $6 $6 $0 $33,000 $231,000 $0 $0
~,VENIDA LEON
10.32 STREET CARNELIAN AVE BANYAN TO WILSON $0 $0 $0 $0 $6 $55.000 $0
~d~_l 0,32 STREET CARNELIAN AVE HILLSIDE TO ALMOND $6 $0 $6 $0 $380,00(] $0 $0
10,32 STREET ~HERRY AVE SUMMIT AVE TO RTE 15 $0 $0 $0 $(] $40,00~ $0 $(~
10.32 STREET 2HURCH FROM ETIWANDA $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $250,000 $0
'.MILLER) TO EAST AVE
10,32 STREET ~HURCH ST ~,RCHIBALD AVE TO HAVEN $6 $0 $0~ $20,000 $200,000 $600,000 $600.00fl
10,32 STREET ;HURCH ST ELM TO ROCHESTER $6 $0 $(] $0 $6 $100,000 $1,320,00(]
10.32 STREET ;HURCH ST ~OCHESTER TO $(] $0 $(] $0 $80,000 $200.000 $935,00(]
3AY CREEK BLVD
22 STREET EAST AVE 'BASE LINE RD TO $0 $(] $35,000 $350,000 $440,000 $0 $0
VICTORIA AVE
~2 ;TREET EAST AVE HIGHLAND TO SUMMIT $0 $300,000 $0 $6 $6 $0 $0
~2 STREET EAST AVE VICTORIA TO HIGHLAND $6 $310,000 $0 $6 $0 $0 $0
10,14 STREET EAST AVE N/O SUMMIT AVE $0 $100,000 $0 $6 $0 $0 $0
32 STREET ETIWANDA AVE AT&SF TO S/O ARROW RTE $0 $20,000 $20,000 $305,000 $0 $6 $0
~0,32 STREET ETIWANDA AVE 4TH TO ARROW $0 $0 $6 $100,000 $300,000 $1,020,000 $0
10,32 S n R~ I ETIWANDA AVE FOOTHILL TO EASE LINE $6 $6 $6 $60,000 $520,000 $400,000 $0
!10,32 STREET FERON BLVD HERMOSA TO ARCHIBALD $6 $6 $0 $50,000 $0 $6 $0
~DA STREET FOOTHILL BLVD I AT GROVE AVE $0 $6 $165,000 $545,000 $0 $6 $0
RDA STREET FOOTHILL BLVD 2 GROVE TO SO PAC RR $0 $0 $100,000 $750,000 $1,250,000 $0 $0
PAGE I I 04/13/95
SEVEN ~L IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
E_UND TYPE NAME LOCATION FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-9~ FY 97-98 FY 98-99 FY 99-00 FY 00-01
RDA STREET FOOTHILL BLVD 3 ~,T SO PACIFIC RR $0; $0 $~ $370,000 $130,000 $5,300,000 $0
RDA STREET FOOTHILL BLVD 4 SO PAC RR TO LION $0 $(3 $0 $0 $120,000 $425.000 $1,485 0l')0
RDA STREET FOOTHILLBLVD5 LION TO HELMS $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $45.000 $1,160,000
RDA STREET FOOTHILL BLVD 6 ~,T ARCHIBALD AVE $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $80,000 $300,000 $0
R__DA STREET FOOTHILL BLVD 7 HELMS TO HAVEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $335.000 $3,000,000
RDA STREET FOOTHILL BLVD 8 I 3RCHARD TO ROCHESTER $0 $0 $713,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
RDA STREET =OOTHILLBLVD9 :~OCHESTERTOI*15 $0 $0 $3,750,000 $0 $0 $0
RDA STREET =OOTHILL BLVD 1 ~T RTE 151 N-B ON RAMP $3,550,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
RDA STREET :OOTHILL BLVD 1 15 TO ETIWANDA AVE $0 $0 $100.000 $150,000 $1,250,000 $0 $0
RDA STREET -'OOTHILL BLVD 1 -'TIVVANDA TO EAST AVE $0 $0 $0 $200.000 $250,000 $2.600,000
RDA STREET 3ROVE AVE SAN BERNARDINO RD, $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $340,000 $375.000 $0
TO FOOTHILL BLVD
22 STREET HAVEN AVE AT & SF RAILROAD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
UNDERPASS
32,OT STREET HAVEN AVE BASE LINE TO WILSON $0 $430,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
10,32 STREET HELLMAN AVE BASE LINE RD TO 19TH $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $200,000 $0 $0
32 STREET HELLMAN AVE S/O BANYAN TO $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0
S/O HILLSIDE
l0 STREET HELMS AVE 9TH ST TO FERON AVE $0 $0 $0 $100.000 $0 $0 $0
32 STREET HERMOSA AVE 4TH TO FOOTHILL $0 $295,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
I 0 STREET HERMOSA AVE COCOA TO NIO COCOA $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $0 $0
EAST SIDE
10,32 STREET HERMOSA AVE HILLSIDE TO VISTA GROVE $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0
10,32 STREET HERMOSA AVE NIO 19TH TO HIGHLAND $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 $0
10,32 STREET HERMOSA AVE NIO HIGHLAND TO BRISTOL $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $~3 $0 $~3
10,32 STREET HERMOSA AVE WILSON TO HILLSIDE $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0
10 STREET HIGHLAND AVE AMETHYST TO ARCHIBALD $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $100,000 $280,000
10,32 STREET HIGHLAND AVE MAYBERRY TO HAVEN $0 $0 $0 $15,00--0 _ $165,000 $0
1--0,32 STREET HILLSIDE RD ALTA LOMA CHANNEL TO $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
HERMOSA AVE
10,32 STREET HYSSOP ST STH TO 1200 FT S/O 6TH $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $275,000 $0
10,32 STREET JERSEY BLVD HAVEN AVE TO $0 $605,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
& OT AT & SF RAIL ROAD SPURR
28 ST CDBG MONTE VISTA AMETHYST TO ARCHIBALD $0 $0 $22,000 $60.000 $0 $0 $0
SIDWLK ETC
10,32 STREET PECAN AVE ARROW RTE TO WHITTRAM $0[ $0 $(3 $0 $0 $30,000 $200,000
28 ST CDBG RANCHERIA 3ROVE TO TAPIA VIA $(3 $0 $31,00G $150,000 $0 $0 $0
10,32 STREET ROCHESTER AVE ~TH TO AT & SFRR $13 $(3 $20,000 $200,000 $20,000 $0 $0
28 ST CDBG SALINNVINMAR 2.ALAVERAS TO SIERRA MADRE $158,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
10,32 TREET SAN BERNARDINC 3ROVE TO W/O FOOTHILL $0 $(3 $0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0
10.32 STREET SAPPHIRE ST HILLSIDE TO ALMOND $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,000 $0 $0
10,32 STREET SAPPHIRE ST MOON ST TO HILLSIDE $0 $0 $0 $165,000 $0 $0 $~0
PAGE 12 04/I3/95
SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
FUND FYPE NAME LOCATION FY 94-95 FY 95-96 FY 96-97 FY 97-98 IcY 98-99 FY 99-00 FY 00-01
10 STREET SAPPHIRE ST N/O JENNET TO HILLSIDE S0 $0 $20.000 $0 $120.000 S$00[ S0
10 STREET SUMMIT AVE EAST AVE TO 1200 FT $6 $25.000 $0 $0 $0i $0
EAST OF EAST AVE
28 ST CDBG TARA VIA GROVE TO RANCHERIA $6 $30.000 $175,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0
22 STREET VICTORIA ST E/O ETIWANDA TO $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,00(]
I/~EST OF EAST AVE
9 STREET ~/ICTORIA ST PECAN TO W/O PECAN $6.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
32 STREET ~/ICTORIA ST I'EAK WAY TO HERMOSA $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $40.00(] $50,000 $0
NORTH SIDE
10 STREET ~M"IITTRAM AVE ETIVVANDA TO PECAN $0 $0 $0 $0 $(3 $30.000 $450.000
32 STREET ~'VI"IITTRAM AVE PECAN TO HICKORY $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $450.000
32 STREET ~VILSON AVE CARNELIAN TO HELLMAN AVE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60.000 $670.000
32 STREET WILSON AVE HAVEN TO E/O HAVEN AVE $0 $0 $0 $0 $30.000 $320.000 $30.000
CHAFFEY COLLEGE FRONTAGE
10 STREET WILSON AVE /VIO ARCHIBALD AVE TO $0 $0 $0 $0 $10.000 $110.000 $0
~RCHIBALD AVE
32 STREET ~/ILSON AVE /V/O HERMOSA TO HERMOSA $0 $0 $0 $0 $7.000 $77.000 $0
32 STREET /VILSON AVE ~,RCHIBALD INTERSECTION $0 $166,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL STREET PROJECTS $4,850,720 $2,748,000 $6,285,000 $6,480,000 $9.169,500 $17,028,500 $15,755,000
PAGE 13 04/13/95
SEVEN' IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
FVf~]TYPE INAME ILOCATION I FY 94-951 FY 95-961 FY 96-971 FY 97-98~ FY 98-99/ FY 99-001 FY 00-01
VII STREET IMPROVEMENT AND RELATED STORM DRAIN PROJECTS
22 STREET_SD 'lICKDRY AVE ~,RROW RTE TO WHITTRAM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $330,000
24.12 STREET_SD ~IILLIKENAVE ~,RROWRTETOFOOTHILL $1,580,O00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
32,24 STREET SD ?.ARNELIAN AVE SIlO BASE LINE RD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $1,200,00n
ro 19TH STREET
32.24 STREET_SD CARNELIAN AVE 5AN BERNARDINO RD TO $0 $2.500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NORTH OF BASE LINE RD
BDA STREET_SD FOOTHILL BLVD C UNDERPASS $0 $0 $0 $0 $250.000 $250,000 $0
SO PACIFIC RAIL ROAD
~DA STREET SD FOOTHILL BLVD E HELMS TO HAVEN AVE $0 $O $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $335,000
PHASE 2
~DA STREET.SD FOOTHILL BLVD F HELLMAN TO HELMS $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 $22,500 $0
PHASE 3
32,35 STREET_SD GROVE AVE 8TH STREET TO SAN BERNARDIN $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $500,000 $1,550,000
~3,35 STREET.SD HAVEN AVE BASE LINE TO FUTURE $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $2,105.000 $2,105.000 $0
HIGHLAND AVE
32,35 STREET_SD HAVEN AVE N/O FOOTHILL TO N/O $4,020,000 $O $0 $0 $0 $0~ $0
BASE LINE RD
32,23 STREET.SD HERMOSA AVE DEER CREEK CHAN TO 1'4/O $0 $0 $0 $0 $760,000 $5,560,000 $5,560.000
19TH IN FOOTHILL & HERMOSA
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL STREET & SD PROJECTS $5.600,000 $2,500,000 $0 $300,000 $3,325,00(] $9,877,500 $8,975,00(]
PAGE 14 04/I 3/95
SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
IFUND ]TYPE INAME [LOCATION I FY 94-95~ FY 95-96[ FY 96-97[ FY 97-98~ FY 98-99[ FY 99-00~ FY 00-01[
VIII MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS
22 BRIDGE 19TH ST CUCAMONGA CREEK CHAN BRID $6 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0
SHARE 1/2 W1TH UPLAND
16 ;~V/PS WHEELCHAIR VARIOUS LOCATIONS $12,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000 $4,000
28 :~NVlP MAIN WHEELCHAIR VARIOUS LOCATIONS $20,000 $20,009 $20,010 $24,211 $26,632 $29,295 $32,2;~,r,
28 SIDBNALKS CDBG VARIOUS LOCATIONS $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $80,000 $305,000 $0
28 SDVV'K MAIN CDBG VARIOUS LOCATIONS $20,000 $22,509 $24,760 $27,236 $29,959 $32,955 $36,250
10 STREET STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION $700,000 $400,000 $800,000 $800,000 $800,000 $900,000 $900,000
VARIOUS LOCATIONS
32 STREET CURB, GU ~ ~ e::~< VARIOUS LOC $0 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000
AND SIDEVVALK
01 tRAIL ALMOND AVE ALMOND COMMUNITY TRAIL $0 $0 $0 $0 $186,000 $0 $0
R20 JNDERGRN UNDGRN DIST VARIOUS LOCATIONS $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
14 31KE LANES AQMD NON-MOTO VARIOUS LOCATIONS $140,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000
LOCKERS I'RASNPORTATIOI~
36,37 IMETROLINK COMMUTER MILLIKEN & SCRRA LINE $600,000 $69,100 $0 $0 $0 $0
STATION PHASE I
36,37 METROLINK COMMUTER MILLIKEN&SCRRALINE $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $2,000.000 $0 $0
STATION PHASE
27,34 PARK NORTH EAST PAR EAST SIDE OF EAST AVE $104,450 .$847,470 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
47 NORTH OF SUMMElT AVE
'tOTAL MISCELLANEOUS PROJ. $1,996,450 $1,898,088 $1,383,770 $1,870,447 $3,661,591 $1,806,250 $1,507,475
PAGE 15 04/13/95
IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
F~ ]TYPE ]NAME ]LOCATION [ FY 94-95t FY 95-96~ FY 96-97] FY 97-981 FY 98-99[ FY 99-00] FY 00-01]
IX SPECIAL ENGINEERING STUDIES
21 BEUT FEE NEXUS $1.000 $1,000 $1.000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1
23 SD MASTER PLAN DRAINAGE UPDATE AT VARIOUS $1,000 $1,000 $1.000 $1,000 $1,000 $1.000 $1,000
10 STREET PMS PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTE $2.000 $2.000 $2.000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000
32 TRAFFIC MODEL TRAFFIC MODEL UPDATE $17,000 $0 $5,000 $5.000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
TOTAL $21,000 $4,000 $9,00C $9,000 $9,000 $9.000 $9.000
PAGE 16 04/I 3/95
SEVEN YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVMENT PROGRAM
[FUND [TYPE INAME ILOCATION [ FY 94-95~ FY 95-96[ FY 96-971 FY 97-981 FY 98-991 FY 99-001 FY 00-01[
X DEVELOPER REIMBURSEMENTS
19 SD ETIVVANDAAVE DRAINAGE REIMBURSEMENTS $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10.000 $10,000 $10.000
23 SO GENERAL CITY DRANIAGE REIMBURSEMENT $60,000 $30,000 $30.000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35.000
'~ SO MASTER PLAN VARIOUS LOCATIONS $1,000 $1,000 $1.00O $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1.000
STUDIES
22 STREET TRANSP. FUND STREET REIMBURSEMENT $143.000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,00C $100.000
TOTAL $209.000 $141.000 $141,000 $146.000 $146,000 $146,000 $146,000
[TOTAL; ALL PROJECTS I $t9,470.9901 $8.557,0881 $12,469,8201 $16.555,191 t $27,939,941 f $36,759,500 ~ S35,836,975 t
PAGE 17 04/13/95