Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016/12/07 - Agenda Packet
LZiAcity of � NCriU ,-0CANtC)NGA 10500 Civic Center Drive � Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3801 City Office: (909) 477-2700 AGENDAS FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD SUCCESSOR AGENCY PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CITY COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 07, 2016 REGULAR MEETINGS 1St and 3rd Wednesdays + 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS CLOSED SESSION Tapia Conference Room ................. 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Public Communications City Manager Announcements Conduct of Closed Session SPECIAL MEETINGS Council Chambers .......................... 6:00 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS Council Chambers .......................... 7:00 P.M. lt'il4iv, 11�I MAYOR MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBERS CITY MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY CITY CLERK CITY TREASURER L. Dennis Michael Sam Spagnolo William Alexander Lynne B. Kennedy Diane Williams John R. Gillison James L. Markman Janice C. Reynolds James C. Frost INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC C.UCAINONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" or on an "Administrative Hearing" Item(s), your name will be called when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Libraries and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 11:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Streaming Video on Demand is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.uslcityhaillcouncillvideos.asp. The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Successor Agency, and Public Financing Authority. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.citvofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please silence all cell phones and devices while the meeting is in session. "140 &CAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 7, 2016 A. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM Al. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams CLOSED SESSION CALLED TO ORDER AS THE CITY COUNCIL. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) �jl C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) D. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS (NO DISCUSSION OR ACTION WILL OCCUR) E. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM E1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) — SOUTHWEST VOTERS REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632 — CITY E2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090-331-03 AND 04, AND 1089-581-04; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND CANDYCE BURNETT, CITY PLANNER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND JOSEPH FILIPPI REPRESENTING FILIPPI WINERY, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE, TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH — CITY E3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932, FIRE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEE GROUP, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274, AND FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION. — CITY E4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR APN'S: 0226-401-01, 0226-421-07, 0226-061-62 AND 0226-061-16; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND MANDY PARKES, INLAND EMPIRE RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. - CITY F. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. "140 &CAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 7, 2016 2 G. 6:00 P.M. - SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL ONLY CALL TO ORDER - COUNCIL CHAMBERS G1. Pledge of Allegiance G2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams F- H. ITEMS OF BUSINESS H1. Public Communication on Items Listed on the Special Meeting Agenda. H2. Presentation of Service Pins to City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council Members and Employees. H3. Recognition of outgoing Library Director, Michelle Perera for her 19 years of service to the City and our Community. I. NOVEMBER 8, 2016 ELECTION RESULTS & OATHS OF OFFICE 11. City Clerk Services Director to recite Election Results for the election of two (2) Members of the City Council, one (1) City Clerk and one (1) City Treasurer each for full terms of four years and Measure "Q" relating to electing members of the City Council by the voters in four Council Districts with an at large Mayor, beginning in 2018 and 2020. 12. City Council to Adopt Resolution Certifying Municipal Election Results. RESOLUTION NO. 16-188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 8, 2016, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS PROVIDED BY PROVISION OF LAW 13. Administration of Oaths of Office to Newly Elected Officials by Jeffery King, Associate Justice, Retired. • Lynne Kennedy, Council Member • Sam Spagnolo, Council Member • Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk • James C. Frost, City Treasurer 14. Remarks by the Newly Elected Officials. The official certified canvass of ballot and returns from the County of San Bernardino were not available at the time of the distribution of the agenda. The staff report, resolution and certified election results for these items will be provided on or before the City Council meeting of December 7, 2016. J. ADJOURNMENT/RECEPTION IN CITY HALL FOYER THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING WILL CONVENE AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 7, 2016 K3 K. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AUTHORITY BOARD, SUCCESSOR AGENCY AND COUNCIL. K1. Pledge of Allegiance K2. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo Council Members Alexander, Kennedy and Williams L. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1-1. Presentation of the Historical Preservation Design Award. 1-2. Recognition of the Evelyn E. Perkins Scholarship Foundation for awarding over $30,000 in Scholarships over the last 10 Years. 17- M. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Board, Public Financing Authority Board, Successor Agency and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Authority Board, Successor Agency or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 7, 2016 0 CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. N. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT N1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 16, 2016 (Regular Meeting) --- N2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated November 8, 2016 through November 28, 1 2016 for the total of $1,874,762.58. IF- 0. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY 01. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 16, 2016 (Regular Meeting) --- P. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY P1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 16, 2016 (Regular Meeting) ""' Q. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL Q1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 16, 2016 (Regular Meeting) --- Q2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated November 8, 2016 through November 28, 1 2016 for the total of $6,248,962.78. Q3. Consideration of a Resolution of the City Council ratifying the Fire District's adoption of the 14 2016 California Fire Code with certain amendments and providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees. RESOLUTION NO. 16-190 15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING ORDINANCE NO. FD 56 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, THE DISTRICT'S ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF THE 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, WITH ERRATA, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN CHANGES, MODIFICATIONS, AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES; AND REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES Q4. Consideration to accept the "Citywide Concrete Repair - FY 2015/2016 Project", Contract No. 16 15-208 as complete; release the Faithful Performance Bond; accept a Maintenance Bond; authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond; approve a resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion; authorize the release of the retention 35 days after acceptance; and approve the final contract amount of $856,792.60. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 7, 2016 61 RESOLUTION NO. 16-191 18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR - FY 2015/2016 PROJECT", CONTRACT NO. 15-208 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Q5. Consideration to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract 19 in the amount of $383,247.25 for the "Civic Center — Landscape Renovation Phase 1 Project' to the lowest responsive bidder, Principles Contracting, Inc. of Riverside, and authorize the expenditure of a contingency in the amount of $38,324.73 to be funded from Account No. 1025001-5607 (Capital Reserve). Q6. Consideration to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 58726500M in the amount of 24 $54,068.16, for the 8th Street from Baker Avenue to Hellman Avenue, Baker Avenue from Main Street to Foothill Boulevard and 6th Street from Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Contract No. 15-094. Q7. Consideration of adoption of Resolutions approving an Improvement Agreement, Improvement 26 Securities and ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2008-00909, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Street, submitted by NAS Alta Loma, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 16-192 27 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2008-00909 RESOLUTION NO. 16-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 28 CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR DRC2008-00909 RESOLUTION NO. 16-194 33 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR DRC2008-00909 RESOLUTION NO. 16-195 38 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR DRC2008- 00909 Q8. Consideration of approval of time extension to an Improvement Agreement for DRC2014- 43 00566, located at 10220 4th Street, submitted by TREF Rancho, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 16-196 45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION TO AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2014-00566 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 7, 2016 C.1 Q9. Consideration of approval to accept public improvements, release the Faithful Performance 46 Bond, and file a Notice of Completion for public improvements for DRC2015-00111, located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Golden Prairie Drive, submitted by Pulte Homes. RESOLUTION NO. 16-197 48 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2015-00111 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Q10. Consideration of approval to release the retained Restoration Cash Deposit in lieu of the 49 Labor and Material and Maintenance Bonds for 8547 Grove Avenue, submitted by David Domingues. Q11. Consideration of approval of a time extension to the Improvement Agreement for DRC2006- 51 01012, located at the north east corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue, submitted by Chase Back Bay, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 16-198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 52 CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION TO THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2006-01012 Q12. Consideration of approval of Reimbursements for Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Master Plan 53 Drainage Improvements for FY 2015/16 and an appropriation of $258,898.78 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116) to Account No. 1116303-5650/1026116- 0. Q13. Consideration of approval of Reimbursements for General City Master Plan Drainage 54 Improvements for FY2015/2016 and an appropriation of $69,438.76 from the General City Drainage Fund (Fund 112) to Account No. 1112303-5650/1026112-0. Q14. Consideration to approve the single source purchase of video detection system equipment for 55 fifteen (15) intersections Citywide from the supplier, Rodefx Inc., in the amount of $334,727.64, for use in the Traffic Signal Video Detection at Fifteen Locations Project and to be funded from Measure I and Gas Tax R&T7360 Funds. Q15. Consideration to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of a contract 57 in the amount of $177,000, to the lowest responsive bidder, Hardy & Harper, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $17,700, for the Red Hill Park Pedestrian Trail Renovation Project, and authorize an appropriation in the amount of $226,540 from Park District PD -85 Fund (Fund 848) to fund the contract as well as related construction management costs. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 7, 2016 7 R. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 7L- CITY COUNCIL & FIRE DISTRICT 11 The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Mayor will open the meeting to receive public testimony. R1. Consideration of an extension of Urgency Ordinance No. 900 for an additional 10 months and 59 15 days prohibiting all commercial Cannabis uses in the City, prohibiting outdoor marijuana cultivation on private residences, and adopting regulations regarding indoor cultivation in private residences. - CITY ORDINANCE NO. 900-A 61 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 900 PROHIBITING ALL COMMERCIAL NON-MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACTIVITY IN THE CITY, PROHIBITING OUTDOOR MARIJUANA CULTIVATION ON PRIVATE RESIDENCES, AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS REGARDING INDOOR CULTIVATION IN PRIVATE RESIDENCES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF 67 R2. Consideration of proposed Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments. — CITY & FIRE RESOLUTION NO. 16-199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 73 CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO ANIMAL SERVICES, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT, COMMUNITY SERVICES, ENGINEERING SERVICES, PLANNING, AND POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SERVICES RESOLUTION NO. 16-200 80 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 14-102, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF 91 RESOLUTION NO. FD16-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND WAIVING THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN PERMIT FEES IF S. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS - CITY COUNCIL The following items have no legal publication or posting requirements. S1. Consideration of approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifying basis for exception to the 180 -day wait period GC Sections 7522.56 & 21221(h) to 93 allow a CALPERS retiree to fill an executive position during an ongoing recruitment and consideration of approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga certifying the requirements of GC Section 21221(h) to allow a CALPERS retiree to fill an executive position during an ongoing recruitment. 163 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA DECEMBER 7, 2016 RESOLUTION NO. 16-201 95 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING BASIS FOR EXCEPTION TO THE 180 -DAY WAIT PERIOD GC SECTIONS 7522.56 AND 21221(H) TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT RESOLUTION NO. 16-202 99 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING BASIS FOR GC SECTION 21221(H) TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT S2. Verbal Update on the Baseline Interchange Project. --- T. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. T1. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings --- that were attended.) T2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council --- Member.) U. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING By prior action of the City Council, the Regular meetings of December 21, 2016 were cancelled and a Special meeting was scheduled for Thursday, December 15, 2016. V. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 1, 2016, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and on the City's website. Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director City of Rancho Cucamonga November 16, 2016 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLOSED SESSION, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES A. 5:00 P.M. - CLOSED SESSION CALL TO ORDER - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday, November 16, 2016 in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, and Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo. Mayor L. Dennis Michael was absent. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services; and Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. B. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No public communications were made. D. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS No discussion or actions were taken. E. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM E1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL— EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) — SOUTHWEST VOTERS REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT AND LOUISA OLLAGUE V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632 — CITY The closed session recessed at 6:00 p.m. F. RECESS *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 10 G. REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER - 7:00 P.M. - COUNCIL CHAMBERS The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council on November 16, 2016 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Bill Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Williams, and Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo. Mayor L. Dennis Michael was absent. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director and Shirr'I Griffin, Office Specialist II. Local Boy Scout Troops led the Pledge of Allegiance IF- H. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS H1. Recognition of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for being awarded "Best Public Service of the Year". Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo and Members of the City Council along with Assembly Member Marc Steinorth, 40th District Representative, recognized the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for providing an outstanding level of public service and community engagement, noting the success of the Ready RC campaign. Rob Ball, Fire Marshall, Breanna Medina, Emergency Management Coordinator and Kelley Donaldson, Community Affairs Coordinator, received a Certificate of Recognition on behalf of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. H2. Presentation of the Critchen Family Memorial Honor Plaque to Charlene Ariza of the Rancho Cucamonga Equestrian Patrol Unit # 417. Honoree Charlene Araiza, Equestrian Patrol Unit #417, received a plaque and was recognized by Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo, Members of the City Council, Keith Proctor, Rancho Cucamonga Police Sergeant, and her Unit for her dedication and loyalty in patrolling the Equestrian Center. H3. Recognition of new Healthy RC Dining restaurants. Regina Pilson, representing Tropical Smoothie Caf6 and Kelley Choi, representing The Chop Shop, received Certificates of Recognition from Jeni Watanabe, Healthy RC Communications Coordinator, Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo and Members of City Council for participating in the Healthy RC Program. Adam Daylac, Double Play Pizza, was not in attendance, however, was also recognized for participating in the Healthy RC Dining Program. Item H4, H5, H6, and H7 were taken out of order. H7. Presentation of City Tile to Retiring Community Services Director Nettie Nielsen. Nettie Nielsen, retiring Community Services Director, received a Proclamation and City Tile from Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo and Members of the City Council in recognition of her 28 years of devoted service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 10 H6. Presentation of City Tile to Retiring Senior Civil Engineer Dan James Dan James, retiring Senior Civil Engineer, received a Proclamation and City Tile from Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo and Members of the City Council in recognition of his 27 years of devoted service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. H5. Presentation of City Tile to Retiring Department of Innovation & Technology (DoIT) Deputy Director Ingrid Bruce. Ingrid Bruce, retiring Department of Innovation & Technology (DoIT) Deputy Director, received a Proclamation and City Tile from Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo and Members of the City Council in recognition of her 30 years of devoted service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. H4. Presentation of a Proclamation declaring November 16, 2016 as GIS Day. A brief video presentation was shown highlighting GIS Day & the Geography Awareness event held at the Community Center on November 16, 2016. Darryl Polk, Director of Department of Innovation & Technology (DoIT), and staff members from Special Districts and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) DoIT Divisions: Chris Bopko, Management Analyst III; Solomon Nimako, GIS Supervisor; Ryan Wilson, GIS Technician; Art Yero, GIS Technician and Isaiah Aguilera, Special Districts Technician, were in attendance and were presented with a Proclamation declaring November 14-18, 2016 as Geographic Awareness Week and November 16, 2016 as Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Day from Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo and Members of the City Council. IF-- I. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 11. Warren Branch spoke in support of various City representatives. 12. Janet Walton offered a prayer. 13. John Lyons spoke on the November election and local events. IF-- CONSENT CALENDARS 11 J. CONSENT CALENDAR -FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 2, 2016 (Regular Meeting) J2. Consideration to approve Check Register dated October 25, 2016 through November 7, 2016 and Electronic Debit Register for the month of October 2016 for the total of $699,372.63. J3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31, 2016. J4. Consideration of approval to declare surplus District owned equipment, a 1998 Perkins Generator, that has been deemed no longer needed, obsolete or unusable. J5. Consideration to approve a Resolution designating authorized agents to obtain Federal Financial Assistance provided by the Federal Department of Homeland Security and sub -granted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 10 RESOLUTION NO. FD 16-028 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED AGENTS TO OBTAIN FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND SUB -GRANTED TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J6. Consideration of approval to authorize an increase to Contract No. FD15-004 in the amount of $387,217 ($352,015 plus a ten (10) percent contingency) to Erickson -Hall Construction and approve Amendment No. 02 for the addition of extra Construction Management Services to the original contract for the Fire District Training Center, in accordance with the proposal dated October 5, 2016, funded from Account No. 3288501-5650/1735288-6317 and appropriate $387,220 from Fire Protection District Capital Building Reserves Fund Balance to Account No. 3288501-5650/1735288-6317. J7. Consideration of approval to accept fourteen (14) Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBAS) and associated equipment from excess funds awarded from the 2013 Assistance to Firefighters Grant Regional Application through the City of Ontario Fire Department and approval to fund the ten percent (10%) contribution match for a total of $ $13,301.55 and approval to appropriate from Fire District Reserves $13,310 into Account No. 3288501-5200. J8. Consideration to approve the single source purchase of a "FuelMaster" Fuel Management System from the authorized distributor, Syntech, for the fuel stations at the Adult Sports Complex, Public Works Services Center (PWSC) and various Fire District facilities in an amount not to exceed $230,000 from Account Numbers 3288501-5603 (Fire Capital Outlay -Equipment $200,000) and 1714001-5152 (Computer Equipment/Tech Replacement Fund — Computer Software $30,000), as approved in the FY 2016/2017 budget. J9. Consideration to award the purchase of electrical parts and supplies from Royal Wholesale Electric of Rancho Cucamonga, California, in accordance with Request for Bids ("RFB") #16/17-103 in an amount not to exceed $200,000 annually to be funded from various City, Fire District, and Special District funds as approved in the adopted budget for FY 2016-2017. MOTION: Moved by Board Member Alexander, seconded by Board Member Williams, to approve Consent Calendar Items J1. through J9. Motion carried, 4-0-1, President Michael, absent. K. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY K1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 2, 2016 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Agency Member Williams, seconded by Agency Member Kennedy, to approve Consent Calendar Item K1. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Chairman Michael, absent. IF L. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY L1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 2, 2016 (Regular Meeting) MOTION: Moved by Authority Member Kennedy, seconded by Authority Member Alexander, to approve Consent Calendar Item L1. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Chairman Michael, absent. M. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL M1. Consideration to approve Minutes of: November 2, 2016 (Regular Meeting) M2. Consideration to approve Check Register and payroll dated October 25, 2016 through November 7, 2016 and Electronic Debit Register for the month of October 2016 for the total of $8,317,580.20. *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 10 M3. Consideration to receive and file current Investment Schedule as of October 31, 2016. M4. Consideration of approval of a Joint Use Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Cucamonga School District for use of School District sports fields. M5. Consideration to accept and to allocate $18,000 awarded by the California State Library into Library Revenue Account 1290000-4740/0-3730 and appropriate $8,700 into Expenditure Account 1290603- 5010/0-3730 and $1,300 into Expenditure Account 1290603-5030/0-3730 and $8,000 into Expenditure Account 1290603-5200/0-3730 for California Library Literacy Services. M6. Consideration of adoption of an amended and restated "Statement of Goals and Policies for the use of Community Facilities Districts". M7. Consideration to approve a Resolution designating authorized agents to obtain Federal Financial Assistance provided by the Federal Department of Homeland Security and sub -granted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. RESOLUTION NO. 16-183 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DESIGNATING AUTHORIZED AGENTS TO OBTAIN FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND SUB -GRANTED TO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M8. Consideration to accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of the contract in the amount of $469,000, to the lowest responsive bidder, Los Angeles Engineering, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $46,900, for the Madrone Avenue Street Widening Project along the frontage of Los Amigos Park, and authorize appropriations in the total amount of $651,500 from Gas Tax RT7360, FY 15/16 Community Development Block Grant and Utility Undergrounding Funds, to fund the contract as well as related Public Utility Undergrounding costs that will be invoiced separately by the Utilities. M9. Consideration to accept and to allocate $45,000 grant awarded by the California State Library into Library Revenue Account 1291000-4740/0-3768 and appropriate $45,000 into Expenditure Account 1291602-5603/0-3768 for high speed public internet access to the Cenic/Calren network at the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. M10. Consideration of approval to accept Improvements, release the Faithful Performance Bond, accept a Maintenance Bond, give the City Engineer authorization to release the Maintenance Bond after due process, and file a Notice Of Completion for Improvements for DRC2014-01048 located 9189 Utica Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga CA 91730, submitted by CRP Oakmont 6th & Utica, L.P. RESOLUTION NO. 16-184 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2014-01048 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M11. Consideration to award the purchase of electrical parts and supplies from Royal Wholesale Electric of Rancho Cucamonga, California, in accordance with Request for Bids ("RFB") #16/17-103 in an amount not to exceed $200,000 annually to be funded from various City, Fire District, and Special District funds as approved in the adopted budget for FY 2016-2017. M12. Consideration to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract for the base bid plus additive bids 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21 per the attached bid summary in the amount of $639,870 for "Citywide Concrete Repair - FY 2016/2017" to the lowest responsive bidder, DM Contracting, Inc. of Colton, California; and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $63,987 to be funded from Accounts 1001318-5300 (Street Maintenance), 1177303-5300 (Measure 1), 1131303-5300 (LMD 2) and 1134303-5300 (LMD 4R); and authorize an increase of $60,000 to contract CO 08-162 with United Pacific Services to provide additional tree removal services related to the project, to be funded from Account 1001318-5300 (Street Maintenance); as approved in the FY 2016/2017 budget. *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 10 M13. Consideration to approve the single source purchase of a "FuelMaster" Fuel Management System from the authorized distributor, Syntech, for the fuel stations at the Adult Sports Complex, Public Works Services Center (PWSC) and various Fire District facilities in an amount not to exceed $230,000 from Account Numbers 3288501-5603 (Fire Capital Outlay -Equipment $200,000) and 1714001-5152 (Computer Equipment/Tech Replacement Fund — Computer Software $30,000), as approved in the FY 2016/2017 budget. M14. Consideration to award the purchase of Traffic Signal Replacement Batteries from Interstate Battery Inland Empire, of Upland, California, the most responsive bidder, in accordance with Request for Bid ("RFB") #16/17-113 and authorize the expenditure of $100,000 to be funded from Account Number 1712001-5200 (Equipment and Vehicle Replacement Fund) as approved in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 budget. M15. Consideration to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract for the amount of $547,311.60 for the "Animal Care and Adoption Center Makeover Project" to the lowest responsive bidder, Golden Gate Construction of Buena Park; and to authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $54,731.16; and to authorize an appropriation of $66,550.46 into Account 1025001-5650/1920025-0 from the Capital Reserve Fund Balance. M16. Consideration to accept the "Civic Center — Cooling Tower Replacement Project", Contract No. 16-088 as complete; release the Faithful Performance Bond; accept a Maintenance Bond; authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond; approve a Resolution authorizing the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion, release the retention 35 days after acceptance and approve the final contract amount of $222,447. RESOLUTION NO. 16-185 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE CIVIC CENTER — COOLING TOWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT, NO. 16-088 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK M17. Consideration to accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract for "Landscape, Irrigation and Parks Maintenance for PD -85" at Service Level "C" to the most responsive, responsible bidder, BrightView Landscape Services, in response to "Request for Proposal (RFP) 15/16- 124", effective January 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018, in the amount of $194,066.04 from Account 1848303-5300 (PD -85) in accordance with the Public Works Services Department Park Maintenance budget line 5300; and to renew said contract upon mutual consent of City and Contractor for additional one (1) year periods up to a total of seven (7) years ending June 30, 2023. M18. Consideration of approval to authorize the City Mayor to sign Certificate of Compliance No. 2016-00002 for lot line adjustment relating to the new RC Sports Center building. M19. Consideration to approve the plans and specifications for the "Construction of RC Sports Center" and authorize the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice of Inviting Bids", to be funded from Accounts 1025001- 5650 (Capital Reserve), 1198000-5650 (Citywide Infrastructure), 1250401-5650 (Recreation Fund Reserve), 1712001-5650 (Equipment/Vehicle Replacement), 1120401-5650 (Park Development). RESOLUTION NO. 16-186 A RESOLUTION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF RC SPORTS CENTER IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS M20. Consideration to receive Quarterly Budget Update Report. M21. Consideration of approval to authorize budget appropriation transfers between accounts for the Network and Telephone Upgrade Project with no net increase in the total project cost. *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 10 MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to approve Consent Calendar Items M1 through M21. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. N. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL & FIRE DISTRICT N1. Public Hearing and consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. 899 adopting the 2016 California Building Codes, by reference. Additionally, it shall be duly noted that Wednesday, December 21, 2016, will be the last day a permit will be filed under current Code standards; the effective date of said Ordinance will be January 1, 2017. — CITY ORDINANCE NO. 899 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 15.04, 15.12, 15.14, 15.16, 15.20, 15.24 AND 15.26 OF TITLE 15, OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, INCORPORATING THE "INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, VOLUMES 1 AND 2", 2015 EDITION INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; 2016 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, INCORPORATING THE "INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE" 2015 EDITION INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE", 2015 EDITION; INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, INCORPORATING THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE", 2015 EDITION, INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; THE 2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE, INCORPORATING THE "NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE", 2014 EDITION, INCLUDING ANNEXES THERETO; 2016 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE INCLUDING APPENDICES THERETO; TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN AMENDMENTS, DELETIONS, ADDITIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS John Gillison, City Manager, gave a brief background to the Ordinance and introduced Trang Huynh, Building & Safety Services Director, who gave the Staff Report. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications on this item. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to adopt Ordinance No. 899, to be read by title only and waive further reading. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. 899. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Alexander, to adopt Ordinance No. 899, to be read by title only and waive further reading. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 of 10 N2. Public Hearing and consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance No. FD 56 adopting the 2016 California Fire Code, by reference, with certain amendments and providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees. The effective date of said Ordinance will be January 1, 2017. — FIRE ORDINANCE NO. FD 56 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, WITH ERRATA, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN CHANGES, MODIFICATIONS, AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES; AND REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES John Gillison, City Manager, gave a brief background to the Ordinance and introduced Rob Ball, Fire Marshall, who gave the Staff Report. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications on this item. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Board Member Kennedy, seconded by Board Member Williams, to adopt Ordinance No. FD 56, to be read by title only and waive further reading. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Ordinance No. FD 56. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Board Member Kennedy, seconded by Board Member Williams, to adopt Ordinance No. FD 56, to be read by title only and waive further reading. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. O. ADMINISTRATIVE PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY COUNCIL & FIRE DISTRICT 01. Consideration to approve a Resolution setting forth findings with respect to local conditions within the City which makes certain modifications and changes to the 2016 Edition of the California Building Code, the California Residential Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Mechanical Code and the California Electrical Code necessary. RESOLUTION NO. 16-187 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO LOCAL CONDITIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WHICH MAKE CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS AND CHANGES TO THE 2016 EDITION OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, THE CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, THE CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE AND THE CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE NECESSARY John Gillison, City Manager, gave a brief introduction to the Resolution and introduced Trang Huynh, Building & Safety Services Director, who gave the Staff Report. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications on this item. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo closed the Public Hearing. *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 8 of 10 Council Member Kennedy expressed appreciation on having the flexibility of local control on the items presented. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve Resolution No. 16-187. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. 02. Consideration to approve a Resolution that sets forth the findings that allow the Board to make amendments and other changes to the 2016 California Fire Code. RESOLUTION NO. FD 16-029 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETTING FORTH FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO LOCAL CLIMATIC, GEOLOGICAL, AND TOPOGRAPHICAL CONDITIONS WHICH MAKE CHANGES, MODIFICATIONS, AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE REASONABLY NECESSARY John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Rob Ball, Fire Marshall, who gave the Staff Report. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo opened the Public Hearing. There were no public communications on this item. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Board Member Williams, seconded by Board Member Kennedy, to approve Resolution No. FD 16-029. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. P. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS CITY COUNCIL P1. Update on the Enforcement & Hazard Mitigation Plan for the Thoroughbred Holiday Lights Event. John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Danielle Boldt, Chief of Police; Sergeant Phill Dupper, RCPD and Jason Welday, Engineering Services Director/City Engineer who gave the Staff Report. Staff reviewed information regarding the operations plan for the 2016 Thoroughbred Holiday lights event. Discussion ensued on vehicular and pedestrian traffic concerns in the affected area. City Council reached a consensus and directed staff to work with the City Attorney to develop an Ordinance or other mechanisms that will allow the City to restrict vehicular or pedestrian traffic, and to return with recommendations for consideration early next year on this Item. P2. Consideration of Urgency Ordinance No. 900; an Interim Ordinance prohibiting all commercial cannabis uses in the City, prohibiting outdoor marijuana cultivation on private residences, and adopting regulations regarding indoor cultivation in private residences, and declaring the urgency thereof. ORDINANCE NO. 900 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING ALL COMMERCIAL NON-MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACTIVITY IN THE CITY, PROHIBITING OUTDOOR MARIJUANA CULTIVATION ON PRIVATE RESIDENCES, AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS REGARDING INDOOR CULTIVATION IN PRIVATE RESIDENCES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 9 of 10 John Gillison, City Manager, introduced Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, who gave the Staff Report. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to introduce Urgency Ordinance No. 900, to be read by title only and waived further reading and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 900. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, read the title of Urgency Ordinance No. 900. VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Williams, seconded by Council Member Kennedy, to introduce Urgency Ordinance No. 900, to be read by title only and waived further reading and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 900. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. IF-- Q. COUNCIL BUSINESS Q1. Consideration of Canceling the December 21St, 2016 Regular City Council/Fire/Successor Agency/Public Financing Authority meeting and scheduling a Special Meeting of those Legislative Bodies on December 151h, 2016. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Alexander, seconded by Council Member Williams, to approve cancelling the December 21stmeeting and scheduling a Special Meeting on December 15th, 2016 for the City Council, Fire District, Successor Agency and Finance Authority. Motion carried, 4-0-1, Mayor Michael, absent. Q2. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) Council Member Williams reported that she attended a LAFCO Commission hearing earlier that day. Q3. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Council Member Kennedy thanked staff for a great Veteran's Day ceremony event and Founder's Day parade event. Council Member Williams spoke on a great Founder's Day parade event. Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving and thanked staff for their work. Council Member Alexander congratulated candidates who won the election and thanked the community for attending the Veteran's Day event at Central Park. R. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING There were none. IF-- S. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Pro Tem Spagnolo adjourned the meeting at 9:44 p.m. Approved: ****************** Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director *DRAFT* November 16, 2016 1 Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 10 of 10 5 YEARS Mike Lkleczko (PD) Mark Addy (PD) Michael McCuistion Al Angelo (RC Comm & Arts Foundation) John Meyers (PD) Rosemarie Brown (RC Comm & Arts Fnd) Brett Norman * Euan Bulmer Kristopher Powers (PD) Aliese Chavez Keith Proctor (PD) Pablo Colombi (PD) Dean Rodia Jessica Estrella Ryan Sipma Veronica Fincher Lilana Thomas (PD) Russel Goines (PD) Elsa Tristan * Tammie Graciano * Linda Wieczorek Matthew Hill Ryan Holt Cari Keys David King (PD) 1 a YEARS Gerad Laing (PD) Paul Arganda Richard Landorf Timothy Baltazar fifer Lichtman David Bastian Carrie Marquez (PD) Heather Bolton Karen Marcarello * Kristin Brailey * Michael Markin (PD) Allen Callaci * Beverley McDonough Vilma Callejo-Johnson * Breanna Medina Jennifer Camacho-Curtis * Sandra Medina Lucy Castillo Celeste Medrano Miguel Cervantes Brett Mielke Tiffany Cooper * Christen Mitchell Joy Crow (PD) Matthew Mondry (PD) Brenda Devereux Kristie Nicols Linda Engelke Solomon Nimako Donna Finch Francisco Oaxaca Sandi Fonseca (PD) Andrew Parker Paul Fisher Marc Pinedo Rebecca Fuller Jacques Plummer Minerva Gamboa Jennifer Quan Dale Gose * David Rayenhartz (PD) Barbara Hansen Daniel Renear (PD) # Penni Herman Mable Scott (PD) Maryann Herrarte (PD) Scott Seery * Chris Hughes (PD) Nickalaus Seybert (PD) Kimberly Jurman Lance Snider James Kalas (PD) Trina Valdez 15 YEARS Rafael Balneg Leopouldo Corona Romeo David * Cesar Fregozo Norman Jamerson Veronica Lopez Javier Mendez Daniel Navarrette Pamela Pane Tina Watson Stephen Wolff (PD) 20 YEARS Sandra Cruz (PD) Willie Glenn, Jack Holloway Sonia Mulligan Luci Saunders Julie Ungashick Eric Wells Jeff Wenger 25 YEARS Rosalind Colum Thomas Grahn Hector Najera * 30 YEARS Richard Alcorn Ingrid Bruce * Sandra Ramirez 35 YEARS Steven Campbell Janice Reynolds, City Clerk 40 YEARS L. Dennis Michael, Mayor UCAMONGA "ALIFORNIA Proclamation WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is committed to recognizing individuals who have made a lasting impact on our city and community; and WHEREAS, this month, Michelle Perera is departing as Library Director after 19 years of distinguished service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Library; and WHEREAS, Michelle's leadership, commitment, and dedication to library services has led to stronger collaborations, partnerships, programs, staff, and organizational development; and WHEREAS, during her 19 years, Michelle has played an instrumental role in many successful projects in the City, including the Paul Biane Library; the Archibald Library remodel; the Play and Learn IslandsTM,- the Stafflnnovation FundTM,- RC2Go mobile unit; Team RC Core Team; Team RC Vision, Mission & Values; ten Library Telethons; and most recently, the Biane Library 2"d Floor; and WHEREAS, during her tenure, Michelle has helped build an organization that is not only respected within the community, but also nationwide, as evidenced by the National Medal and a Library Journal Mover and Shaker award in 2013; and WHEREAS, Michelle is very active in the California library community as an advocate, mentor, instructor, and on regional and statewide committees; and WHEREAS, now, Michelle will move on to new opportunities outside the City of Rancho Cucamonga that will allow her to demonstrate the same passion for service and, as she did in Rancho Cucamonga for 19 years, make a difference in innovative and meaningful ways. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council gives its sincere gratitude to Michelle Perera for her outstanding work to make the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library a better and stronger institution, and wishes her all the best in her future endeavors. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be affixed this 7th day of December, 2016 Dennis Michae Mayor Sam Spa of William J. Al ander Mayor Pro Te Council ember Lynne . Kennedy Diane Williams MEMORANDUM CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Directo,__ Subject: Agenda Items 11 and 12 - November 8, 2016 Election Results RECOMMENDATION 1. The City Clerk Services Director recite into the minutes the results of the Canvass of the November 8, 2016 election; and 2. Council adopt Resolution No.16-188 declaring the results of the November 8, 2016 General Municipal Election. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS A General Municipal Election was held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on Tuesday, November 8, 2016 for purposes of electing two Members of the City Council, one City Clerk and one City Treasurer, all for four year terms, and for voting on Measure Q regarding City Council District Elections. The Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Upon certification, the City Council shall meet to declare the result of the election. The "Official Canvass" is attached to the Resolution. Pursuant to the certified election results, the number of votes received by the following candidates were sufficient to declare them elected: Lynne Kennedy, Member of the City Council; Sam Spagnolo, Member of the City Council, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk; James C. Frost, City Treasurer. The number of votes in support of Measure Q exceeded a majority of votes cast; therefore, the measure is approved by the voters. Attachment A - Resolution No, 16-188 RESOLUTION NO. 16-188 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 8, 2016, DECLARING THE RESULTS AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS PROVIDED BY PROVISION OF LAW WHEREAS, a General Municipal. Election was held and conducted in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2016, as required by law; and WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form and manner as prescribed by law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California, for the holding of elections in general law cities; and WHEREAS, the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Bernardino, has canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results as attached hereto made a part hereof as "Exhibit A." NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the number of registered voters in the City was 86,569, making a total of 70,580 ballots cast in the City. Section 2. That the names of persons voted for at the election for Member of the City Council are as follows: Clarence Olson 10,264 Lynne Kennedy 24,577 Chris Salabaj 5,505 Sam Spagnolo 22,273 Amira Abdelmageed 8,515 Curtis Pitts 20,700 Erick Jimenez 4,051 That the names of the persons voted for at the election for City Clerk are as follows: Janice C. Reynolds 48,438 That the names of the persons voted for at the election for City Treasurer are as follows: James C. Frost 49,204 Resolution No. 16-188 Page 1 of 3 That the measure voted upon at the election is as follows: Measure Q Shall four members of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga be elected by geographic YES NO districts with the Mayor elected at large as described in Ordinance No. 887? 37,475 21,381 Section 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in the City to each of the persons above named for the respective offices for which the persons were candidates and for and against Measure Q, were as listed in "Exhibit A" attached. Section 4. The City Council does declare and determine that: Lynne Kennedy was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four years; Sam Spagnolo was elected as Member of the City Council for the full term of four years; Janice C. Reynolds was elected as City Clerk for the full term of four years; James C. Frost was elected as City Treasurer for the full terms of four years; That as a result of the election, a majority of the voters voting on Measure Q, did vote in favor of it, and that the measure was carried, and shall be deemed adopted and ratified. Section 5. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a statement of the result of said election, showing: 1. The whole number of votes cast in the City. 2. The names of the persons voted for. 3. The measure voted upon. 4. For what office each person was voted. 5. The number of votes given at each precinct to each person, and for and against each measure; 6. The total number of votes given to each person, and for and against each measure. Resolution No. 16-188 Page 2 of 3 Section 6. That the City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to the person elected, a Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated; that the City Clerk shall also administer to the person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and shall have them subscribe to it and file it in the Office of the City Clerk. Whereupon, each person so elected shall then be inducted into the respective office to which they have been elected. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a special meeting thereof this 7th day of December 2016. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a special meeting thereof held on December 7, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on December 8, 2016. Janice Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Exhibit "A" (Certified Election Results) Resolution No. 16-188 Page 3 of 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY EXHIBIT A 777 East Rialto Avenue, San Bernardino, CA 92415 1 Phone: 909.387.8300 Fax: 909.387.2022 www.58(ounty.Qoi Elections Office of the Registrar of Voters STATEMENT OF CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION RESULTS 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Michael J. Scarpello Registrar of Voters I, Michael J. Scarpello, San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters, do hereby certify that, pursuant to the provisions of the California Elections Code § 15300, et seq., I did canvass the returns of the votes cast in the 2016 Presidential General Election, held on November 8, 2016, in San Bernardino County, and that the Certified Election Results to which this statement is attached shows the total number of votes cast in San Bernardino County and that the totals as shown are full, true and correct. Witness my hand and official seal this 6th day of December, 2016. Michael J. Scarpello Registrar of Voters Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 Final Certified Election Results Registration & Turnout 888,019 Voters Precinct Turnout 287,315 32.35% Vote by Mail Turnout 385,556 43.42% Total 672,871 75.77% Votes Write-in Total Percent of President and Vice President Cast Votes Votes Total GRN - JILL STEIN AND AJAMU BARAKA 10,603 1 10,604 1.64% DEM - HILLARY CLINTON AND TIM KAINE 340,818 15 340,833 52.64% PF - GLORIA ESTELA LA RIVA AND DENNIS J. BANKS 3,785 1 3,786 0.58% RAI - DONALD J. TRUMP AND MICHAEL R. PENCE 271,225 15 271,240 41.89% LIB - GARY JOHNSON AND BILL WELD 21,048 2 21,050 3.25% Total 647,479 34 647,513 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of United States Senator Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - LORETTA L. SANCHEZ 251,246 0 251,246 45.52% DEM - KAMALA D. HARRIS 300,738 0 300,738 54.48% Total 551,984 0 551,984 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of United States Representative, District 8 Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - RITA RAMIREZ 77,407 0 77,407 37.40% REP - PAUL COOK 129,543 0 129,543 62.60% Total 206,950 0 206,950 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of United States Representative, District 27 Cast Votes Votes Total REP - JACK ORSWELL 9,927 0 9,927 57.67% DEM - JUDY CHU 7,287 0 7,287 42.33% Total 17,214 0 17,214 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of United States Representative, District 31 Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - PETE AGUILAR 121,070 0 121,070 56.07% REP - PAUL CHABOT 94,866 0 94,866 43.93% Total 215,936 0 215,936 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of United States Representative, District 35 Cast Votes Votes Total REP - TYLER FISCHELLA 39,457 0 39,457 29.08% DEM - NORMA J. TORRES 96,223 0 96,223 70.92% Total 135,680 0 135,680 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of United States Representative, District 39 Cast Votes Votes Total REP - ED ROYCE 17,286 0 17,286 60.37% DEM - BRETT MURDOCK 11,346 0 11,346 39.63% Total 28,632 0 28,632 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 1 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Senator, District 21 Cast Votes Votes Total REP - SCOTT WILK 54,222 0 54,222 55.81% DEM - JOHNATHON LEVAR ERVIN 42,932 0 42,932 44.19% Total 97,154 0 97,154 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Senator, District 23 Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - RONALD J. O'DONNELL 94,344 0 94,344 44.17% REP - MIKE MORRELL 119,271 0 119,271 55.83% Total 213,615 0 213,615 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Senator, District 25 Cast Votes Votes Total REP - MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH 17,145 0 17,145 54.65% DEM - ANTHONY J. PORTANTINO 14,225 0 14,225 45.35% Total 31,370 0 31,370 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Senator, District 29 Cast Votes Votes Total REP - LING LING CHANG 15,578 0 15,578 54.06% DEM - JOSH NEWMAN 13,236 0 13,236 45.94% Total 28,814 0 28,814 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Member of the State Assembly District 33 Cast Votes Votes Total REP - JAY OBERNOLTE 84,000 0 84,000 59.96% DEM - SCOTT MARKOVICH 56,086 0 56,086 40.04% Total 140,086 0 140,086 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Member of the State Assembly District 36 Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - STEVE FOX 2,035 0 2,035 29.14% REP - TOM LACKEY 4,948 0 4,948 70.86% Total 6,983 0 6,983 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Member of the State Assembly District 40 Cast Votes Votes Total REP - MARC STEINORTH 76,537 0 76,537 50.64% DEM - ABIGAIL MEDINA 74,589 0 74,589 49.36% Total 151,126 0 151,126 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Member of the State Assembly District 41 Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - CHRIS HOLDEN 17,799 0 17,799 43.86% REP - CASEY C. HIGGINS 22,787 0 22,787 56.14% Total 40,586 0 40,586 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Member of the State Assembly District 42 Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - GREG RODRIGUEZ 14,362 0 14,362 33.23% REP - CHAD MAYES 28,856 0 28,856 66.77% Total 43,218 0 43,218 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 2 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 Votes Write-in Total Percent of County of San Bernardino, Board of Ed., Area C Cast Votes Votes Total BEN RICH LAURA ABERNATHY MANCHA Total County of San Bernardino, Board of Ed., Area E 44,503 1 44,504 42.70% 59,723 4 59,727 57.30% 104,226 5 104,231 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Cast Votes Votes Total ALEN RITCHIE 67,329 0 67,329 56.70% DOUG LEJA 51,408 2 51,410 43.30% Total 118,737 2 118,739 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Member of the State Assembly District 47 Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - ELOISE REYES 62,432 0 62,432 54.56% DEM - CHERYL R. BROWN 51,994 0 51,994 45.44% Total 114,426 0 114,426 100.00% ELBERT W. MUNCY III Votes Write-in Total Percent of Member of the State Assembly District 52 Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - PAUL VINCENT AVILA 33,216 0 33,216 43.55% DEM - FREDDIE RODRIGUEZ 43,062 0 43,062 56.45% Total 76,278 0 76,278 100.00% San Bernardino Community College District, Area 1 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Member of the State Assembly District 55 Cast Votes Votes Total DEM - GREGG D. FRITCHLE 12,073 0 12,073 43.11% REP - PHILLIP CHEN 15,931 0 15,931 56.89% Total 28,004 0 28,004 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Judge. of the Superior Court, Office 24 Cast Votes Votes Total SUSAN SLATER 250,713 9 250,722 46.34% DENISE TRAGER DVORAK 290,293 16 290,309 53.66% Total 541,006 25 541,031 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of County of San Bernardino, Board of Ed., Area C Cast Votes Votes Total BEN RICH LAURA ABERNATHY MANCHA Total County of San Bernardino, Board of Ed., Area E 44,503 1 44,504 42.70% 59,723 4 59,727 57.30% 104,226 5 104,231 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Cast Votes Votes Total ALEN RITCHIE 67,329 0 67,329 56.70% DOUG LEJA 51,408 2 51,410 43.30% Total 118,737 2 118,739 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 3 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Barstow Community College District Cast Votes Votes Total PAUL WILKEY 5,388 0 5,388 24.01% PATRICIA ROSENBERG 3,967 1 3,968 17.68% JOHN D. COFFEY 2,328 0 2,328 10.37% ELBERT W. MUNCY III 2,494 0 2,494 11.11% FERNANDO "FRED" BACA 3,995 0 3,995 17.80% TED P. BACA 4,265 1 4,266 19.01% Total 22,437 2 22,439 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of San Bernardino Community College District, Area 1 Cast Votes Votes Total FRANK REYES 18,726 0 18,726 79.03% PAUL RASSO 4,970 0 4,970 20.97% Total 23,696 0 23,696 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 3 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 4 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of San Bernardino Community College District, Area 5 Cast Votes Votes Total EDUARDO A. VALVERDE 4,541 0 4,541 16.11% GLORIA MACIAS HARRISON 15,398 0 15,398 54.61% NICKOLAS W. ZOUMBOS 8,257 0 8,257 29.28% Total 28,196 0 28,196 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of San Bernardino Community College District, Area 7 Cast Votes Votes Total JOHN G. WURM 10,562 0 10,562 39.36% ANNE L. VIRICEL 13,327 0 13,327 49.66% NADER SHAHATIT 2,947 0 2,947 10.98% Total 26,836 0 26,836 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Victor Valley Community College District Cast Votes Votes Total THOMAS J. KERMAN 34,146 1 34,147 21.53% MARGARET H. KAGY 22,386 0 22,386 14,11% JOHN PINKERTON 43,602 2 43,604 27.49% BOB CONAWAY 6,860 0 6,860 4.32% DAVID "WES" GREGG 14,375 0 14,375 9.06% JOSEPH W. BRADY 37,247 3 37,250 23.48% Total 158,616 6 158,622 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Barstow Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total KRIS OKAMURO 4,874 0 4,874 26.86% BARBARA MAE ROSE 3,501 0 3,501 19.30% RANDY EHRESMAN 2,809 0 2,809 15.48% PAT ALE MAN 2,008 0 2,008 11.07% JULIE CLEMMER 4,951 0 4,951 27.29% Total 18,143 0 18,143 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Beaumont Unified School District, Area 5 Cast Votes Votes Total DAVID A. SANCHEZ 1 0 1 100.00% EDWARD DEAN BROWN 0 0 0 0.00% Total 1 0 1 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Chino Valley Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total MIA ONTIVEROS 16,021 1 16,022 12.02% LILY VALDIVIA-RODRIGUEZ 5,687 0 5,687 4.26% JOE SCHAFFER 18,915 1 18,916 14.19% JAMES NA 22,944 1 22,945 17.21% IRENE HERNANDEZ-BLAIR 23,488 1 23,489 17.61% ANDREW CRUZ 24,085 1 24,086 18.06% DON BRIDGE 22,201 1 22,202 16.65% Total 133;341 6 133,347 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 4 of 22 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 5 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Fontana Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total JASON B. O'BRIEN 12,939 0 12,939 21.36% MARS SERNA 11,229 1 11,230 18.54% LORENA CORONA 7,986 0 7,986 13.18% BARBARA L. CHAVEZ 8,222 1 8,223 13.57% BOBBI CHAVARRIA 6,717 0 6,717 11.09% PETER GARCIA 13,491 0 13,491 22.27% Total 60,584 2 60,586 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Hesperia Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total ELLA M. "LEE" ROGERS 12,527 0 12,527 30.68% RUSTY CALDWELL 6,495 0 6,495 15.91% MARIA TERESA GOMEZ 8,486 0 8,486 20.78% CODY C. GREGG 9,000 0 9,000 22.04% BILL JENSEN 4,322 0 4,322 10.59% Total 40,830 0 40,830 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Lucerne Valley Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total MAVRICK VON HAUG 848 0 848 28.34% TOMMY EDWARD COURTNEY SR 740 0 740 24.73% JEAN MORGAN 717 0 717 23.96% RUBEN DAVID MEDINA 687 0 687 22.96% Total 2,992 0 2,992 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Morongo Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total DARIN SANDEN 8,229 0 8,229 23.25% KARALEE BARB HARGROVE 8,967 1 8,968 25.34% RONALD ALLEN PALMER 8,322 0 8,322 23.51% DENISE MARIE COHEN 9,872 0 9,872 27.89% Total 35,390 1 35,391 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Needles Unified School District, Area 2 Cast Votes Votes Total CHAD DONALD ZAMORA 288 0 288 10.46% CHRISTINA CAMERON-OTERO 753 0 753 27.35% STEVEN THOMAS 583 0 583 21.18% MARILYN H. MATHEWS 1,129 0 1,129 41.01% Total 2,753 0 2,753 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Redlands Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total JAMES O'NEILL 18,090 0 18,090 18.24% ALEX VARA 18,860 0 18,860 19.02% MARIO J. SAUCEDO 9,084 0 9,084 9.16% RICHARD E. HALLER 10,265 0 10,265 10.35% CRISTINA PURACI 13,871 0 13,871 13.99% SHAHEEN EMMANUEL LAKHAN 7,795 1 7,796 7.86% ENSEN MASON 11,222 0 11,222 11.32% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 5 of 22 DAVID L. NILSEN Presidential General Election 0 5,374 29.03% November 8, 2016 4,734 1 4,735 25.58% Summary Report 3,044 0 3,044 16.44% San Bernardino County 931 0 931 Summary # 20 LINDA G. MC INERNY 4,429 1 4,430 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Redlands Unified School District (continued....) Cast Votes Votes Total RONALD MCPECK 9,964 0 9,964 10.05% Total 99,151 1 99,152 100.00% 5,634 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Rialto Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total NANCY O'KELLEY 12,925 1 12,926 22.33% JOE AYALA 13,599 0 13,599 23.49% JOSEPH W. MARTINEZ 16,341 2 16,343 28.23% ABRAHAM MCNALLY 6,770 1 6,771 11.70% DARNELL D. JENKINS 8,254 0 8,254 14,26% Total 57,889 4 57,893 100.00% 72,666 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Rim of the World Unified School District, Area 1 Cast Votes Votes Total GRETCHEN DAVIES 4,812 0 4,812 42.79% LESLIE BRAMSON 6,431 2 6,433 57.21% Total 11,243 2 11,245 100.00% 182,470 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Snowiine Joint Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total DAVID L. NILSEN 5,374 0 5,374 29.03% RICHARD C. UPSHAW 4,734 1 4,735 25.58% LORRI GREER 3,044 0 3,044 16.44% PAUL A. FRIEND 931 0 931 5.03% LINDA G. MC INERNY 4,429 1 4,430 23.93% Total 18,512 2 18,514 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Upland Unified School District Cast Votes Votes Total DONNA ROGONE O'NEILL 5,634 0 5,634 13.50% JEFFREY ROBERT HACKBARTH 8,482 0 8,482 20.33% LINDA ANGONA 11,101 0 11,101 26.61% JACK YOUNG 11,640 0 11,640 27.90% ROBERT H. BENNETT 4,861 0 4,861 11.65% Total 41,718 0 41,718 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Chaffey Joint Union High School District Cast Votes Votes Total SUE OVITT 72,666 0 72,666 39.82% RICHARD THOMAS WILLIAM REYES GALVEZ 15,374 1 15,375 8.43% MARIA GALVAN 27,725 0 27,725 15.19% MATTHEW MUNSON 11,721 0 11,721 6.42% SHARI MEGAW 54,983 0 54,983 30.13% Total 182,469 1 182,470 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Victor Valley Union High School District Cast Votes Votes Total BARBARA JAMES DEW 17,209 1 17,210 30.91% ROSALIO "ROSIE" HINOJOS 11,622 3 11,625 20.88% KEN LARSON 10,550 3 10,553 18.95% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 6 of 22 SAM SAGER Presidential General Election 0 10,426 21.72% November 8, 2016 5,023 0 5,023 10.47% Summary Report 11,060 0 11,060 23.05% San Bernardino County 12,246 0 12,246 Summary # 20 CATHLINE FORT 9,237 0 9,237 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Victor Valley Union High School District {continued...) Cast Votes Votes Total JOSE "JOE" BERRIOS 16,293 1 16,294 29.26% Total 55,674 8 55,682 100.00% 1,072 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Adelanto Elementary School District Cast Votes Votes Total HOLLY ECKES 5,123 0 5,123 33.18% MARY E. ANDERSON 4,667 1 4,668 30.23% CHRISTINE TURNER 5,650 0 5,650 36.59% Total 15,440 1 15,441 100.00% Votes Votes Write-in Total Percent of Central School District Cast Votes Votes Total JOAN R. WEISS 6,652 0 6,652 35.15% KATHY A. THOMPSON 8,301 0 8,301 43.87% ROBERT E. MOYA 3,969 0 3,969 20.98% Total 18,922 0 18,922 100.00% Total Votes Write-in Total Percent of Etiwanda School District Cast Votes Votes Total SAM SAGER 10,426 0 10,426 21.72% TALINE GEORGIOU 5,023 0 5,023 10.47% ROBERT GARCIA 11,060 0 11,060 23.05% DAVID W. LONG 12,246 0 12,246 25.52% CATHLINE FORT 9,237 0 9,237 19.25% Total 47,992 0 47,992 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Helendale School District Cast Votes Votes Total MICHAEL A. ESPOSITO 1,072 0 1,072 28.02% HEATHER ALLGOOD 1,294 0 1,294 33.82% JENNIFER LYNN FUNT 754 0 754 19.71% MARIA S. FERRIN 706 0 706 18.45% Total 3,826 0 3,826 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Mountain View School District Cast Votes Votes Total JAMES LEE WILLINGHAM 1,951 0 1,951 20.03% MAUREEN S. SWEENEY 2,695 0 2,695 27.68% PEGGY A. CAMPBELL 2,139 0 2,139 21.97% MARCOS MEZA 2,953 0 2,953 30.32% Total 9,738 0 9,738 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Mt Baldy Joint School District Cast Votes Votes Total MARCIA L. CAMPBELL 150 0 150 68.18% RONALD ELWYN THOMAS JR 70 0 70 31.82% Total 220 0 220 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 ANI Page 7 of 22 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 8 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Ontario -Montclair School District Cast Votes Votes Total ALFONSO SANCHEZ 19,996 0 19,996 35.04% JOHN MICHAEL AVILA 3,999 0 3,999 7.01% SARAH S. GALVEZ 13,075 0 13,075 22.91% PAUL LEON 12,828 0 12,828 22.48% MAUREEN "MOE" MENDOZA 7,167 0 7,167 12.56% Total 57,065 0 57,065 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Victor Elementary School District Cast Votes Votes Total GABRIEL LUIS STINE 12,879 1 12,880 39.53% PATTY PLAXTON 9,798 0 9,798 30.07% JOYCE CROSS CHAMBERLAIN 9,905 1 9,906 30.40% Total 32,582 2 32,584 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Board of Supervisors, District 1 Cast Votes Votes Total ANGELA VALLES 54,025 1 54,026 48.24% ROBERT A. LOVINGOOD 57,958 4 57,962 51.76% Total 111,983 5 111,988 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Adelanto, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total JERMAINE WRIGHT SR. 2,706 0 2,706 32.77% TAREEF SALAH 1,021 0 1,021 12.36% EDGAR "ED" CAMARGO 2,483 0 2,483 30.07% JOY JEANNETTE 2,048 0 2,048 24.80% Total 8,258 0 8,258 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Town of Apple Valley, Town Council Cast Votes Votes Total SALVADOR ORTIZ-LOPEZ 2,614 0 2,614 6.17% BRYEN WRIGHT 4,503 0 4,503 10.63% JILES SMITH 3,876 0 3,876 9.15% TOM PIPER 1,488 0 1,488 3.51% LARRY CUSACK 10,640 0 10,640 25.12% RICHARD BUNCK 4,694 0 4,694 11.08% ART BISHOP 14,550 0 14,550 34.34% Total 42,365 0 42,365 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Chino, Mayor Cast Votes Votes Total BRANDON M. VILLALPANDO 7,823 0 7,823 31.92% EUNICE ULLOA 16,682 1 16,683 68.08% Total 24,505 1 24,506 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Chino, City Council, District 1 Cast Votes Votes Total GLENN DUNCAN 4,552 0 4,552 100.00% Total 4,552 0 4,552 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 8 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 9 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Chino, City Council, District 4 Cast Votes Votes Total TOM HAUGHEY 5,001 0 5,001 100.00% Total 5,001 0 5,001 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Chino Hills, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total JAMES W. GALLAGHER 6,611 0 6,611 14.16% CYNTHIA MORAN 15,139 0 15,139 32.43% PAUL J. MOLINARO 5,402 0 5,402 11.57% ROSSANA MITCHELL-ARRIETA 9,291 0 9,291 19.90% ART BENNETT 10,243 0 10,243 21.94% Total 46,686 0 46,686 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Colton, City Council, District 3 Cast Votes Votes Total FRANK J. NAVARRO 1,127 0 1,127 61.69% KELLY J. CHASTAIN 700 0 700 38.31% Total 1,827 0 1,827 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Colton, City Council, District 5 Cast Votes Votes Total JACK R. WOODS 1,268 1 1,269 49.00% KIRK LARSON 213 0 213 8.22% JOHN MITCHELL 324 0 324 12.51% BRUCE BENNETT 784 0 784 30.27% Total 2,589 1 2,590 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Colton, City Council, District 6 Cast Votes Votes Total ISAAC T. SUCHIL 1,096 0 1,096 58.86% SARAH S. ZAMORA 766 0 766 41.14% Total 1,862 0 1,862 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Colton, City Clerk Cast Votes Votes Total CAROLINA R. PADILLA 11,040 0 11,040 100.00% Total 11,040 0 11,040 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Colton, City Treasurer Cast Votes Votes Total AURELIO W. DE LA TORRE 10,655 0 10,655 100.00% Total 10,655 0 10,655 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Fontana, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total ISSAM K. KIRRISH 2,230 0 2,230 2.72% JESUS "JESSE" SANDOVAL 21,426 0 21,426 26.12% LYDIA SALAZAR-WIBERT 14,133 0 14,133 17.23% CEZAR REYES 8,824 0 8,824 10.76% JESSE ARMENDAREZ 15,095 0 15,095 18.40% TRESSY CAPPS 2,595 0 2,595 3.16% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 9 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 10 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Fontana, City Council (continued...} Cast Votes Votes Total ADRIAN FELIX GONZALEZ 2,478 0 2,478 3.02% OSBERN I. LEWIS 1,817 0 1,817 2.21% H. "KEN" FRIEDMAN 3,938 0 3,938 4.80% EDDIE MCCLOUD 9,502 0 9,502 11.58% Total 82,038 0 82,038 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Grand Terrace, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total SYLVIAA. ROBLES 2,498 0 2,498 27.61% BRIAN L. REINARZ 2,074 0 2,074 22.92% WILLIAM 'BILL" HUSSEY 2,702 0 2,702 29.87% BECKY GIROUX 1,773 0 1,773 19.60% Total 9,047 0 9,047 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Hesperia, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total BRUCE D. KRUEGER 2,656 0 2,656 6.74% REBEKAH SWANSON 6,957 0 6,957 17.65% ERIC E. SCHMIDT 6,170 0 6,170 15.66% BOB STINE 5,998 0 5,998 15.22% ANTHONY A. RHOADES 1,716 0 1,716 4.35% LARRY BIRD 11,557 0 11,557 29.33% JAMES M. BLOCKER 1,401 0 1,401 3.56% BILL JENSEN 2,952 0 2,952 7.49% Total 39,407 0 39,407 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Highland, City Council, District 1 Cast Votes Votes Total JORGE OSVALDO HEREDIA 569 0 569 35.06% RAYMOND HILFER 405 0 405 24.95% JESUS "JESSE" CHAVEZ 649 0 649 39.99% Total 1,623 0 1,623 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Highland, City Council, District 2 Cast Votes Votes Total ANAELI SOLANO 895 0 895 59.00% TONY COLLINS CIFUENTES 622 0 622 41.00% Total 1,517 0 1,517 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Highland, City Council, District 4 Cast Votes Votes Total RUSSELL 'RUSTY" RUTLAND 714 0 714 15.97% FRANK ADOMITIS 569 0 569 12.73% JOHN P. TIMMER 1,998 0 1,998 44.69% CHRISTY MARIN 1,190 0 1,190 26.62% Total 4,471 0 4,471 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Highland, City Council, District 5 Cast Votes Votes Total JERRY MARTIN 1,869 0 1,869 41.31% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 10 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 December 6, 2016 9:00 AIM Page 11 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Highland, City Council, District 5 (continued...} Cast Votes Votes Total LARRY MCCALLON 2,655 0 2,655 58.69% Total 4,524 0 4,524 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Montclair, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total JULIET OROZCO 2,383 2 2,385 16.97% JAVIER "JOHN" DUTREY 3,448 1 3,449 24.53% CAROLYN M. RAFT 3,576 0 3,576 25.44% IDA ALLEN 1,690 1 1,691 12.03% BENJAMIN LOPEZ 2,957 0 2,957 21.03%" Total 14,054 4 14,058 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Needles, Mayor Cast Votes Votes Total EDWARD T. PAGET 1,117 0 1,117 100.00% Total 1,117 0 1,117 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Needles, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total LINDA J. KIDD 398 0 398 11.56% JOHN H. WAGNER 94 0 94 2.73% TOM DARCY 317 0 317 9.21% CLAYTON B. HAZLEWOOD 484 0 484 14.06% SHAWN GUDMUNDSON 515 0 515 14.96% TIMOTHY TERRAL 271 0 271 7.87% GERALD "JERRY" TELLES 431 0 431 12.52% RUTH MUSSER-LOPEZ 350 0 350 10.17% TONA BELT 583 0 583 16.93% Total 3,443 0 3,443 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Ontario, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total RUBEN VALENCIA 12,927 0 12,927 19.59% GUS JAMES SKROPOS 7,349 0 7,349 11.14% RICHARD ROYBAL JR. 4,434 0 4,434 6.72% ELVIA M. RIVAS 6,988 0 6,988 10.59% JOSIE S. ESTRADA 2,906 0 2,906 4.40% PAUL VINCENT AVILA 7,590 0 7,590 11.50% DEBRA PORADA 11,205 0 11,205 16.98% SAM CROWE 8,676 0 8,676 13.15% RICHARD THOMAS WILLIAM REYES GALVEZ 2,430 0 2,430 3.68% AARON MATTHIESEN 1,467 0 1,467 2.22% Total 65,972 0 65,972 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Ontario, City Clerk Cast Votes Votes Total MARISELA "MARC]' GARCIA 7,567 0 7,567 20.19% SARAH S. GALVEZ 13,090 0 13,090 34.93% SHEILA MAUTZ 16,818 2 16,820 44.88% Total 37,475 2 37,477 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AIM Page 11 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 12 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Ontario, City Treasurer Cast Votes Votes Total JAMES R. MILHISER 33,319 0 33,319 100.00% Total 33,319 0 33,319 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total CLARENCE OLSON 10,264 0 10,264 10.70% LYNNE KENNEDY 24,577 0 24,577 25.63% CHRIS SALABAJ 5,505 0 5,505 5.74% SAM SPAGNOLO 22,273 0 22,273 23.23% AMIRAABDELMAGEED 8,515 0 8,515 8.88% CURTIS PITTS 20,700 0 20,700 21.59% ERICK JIMENEZ 4,051 0 4,051 4.22% Total 95,885 0 95,885 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Clerk Cast Votes Votes Total JANICE C. REYNOLDS 48,438 0 48,438 100.00% Total 48,438 0 48,438 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Rancho Cucamonga, City Treasurer Cast Votes Votes Total JAMES C. FROST 49,203 1 49,204 100.00% Total 49,203 1 49,204 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Redlands, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total MIKE A. SAIFIE 5,472 0 5,472 11.90% IVAN RAMIREZ 3,331 0 3,331 7.24% ANDY HODER 4,021 0 4,021 8.74% KEN HUNTER 4,670 1 4,671 10.16% KAISAR AHMED 5,401 0 5,401 11.74% PAT GILBREATH 8,216 0 8,216 17.86% DUSTIN J. FOSTER 3,673 0 3,673 7.99% EDDIE TEJEDA 5,733 0 5,733 12.46% JOHN "JIM" JAMES 5,476 1 5,477 11.91% Total 45,993 2 45,995 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Redlands, City Clerk Cast Votes Votes Total JEANNE DONALDSON 15,703 0 15,703 63.35% AL HERNANDEZ 6,854 0 6,854 27.65% N. W. "NICK" MILLER 2,229 1 2,230 9.00% Total 24,786 1 24,787 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Redlands, City Treasurer Cast Votes Votes Total ROBERT E. DAWES 21,456 0 21,456 100.00% Total 21,456 0 21,456 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 12 of 22 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 13 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Rialto, Mayor Cast Votes Votes Total DEBORAH ROBERTSON 14,784 0 14,784 59.77% EDWARD M. PALMER 9,948 2 9,950 40.23% Total 24,732 2 24,734 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Rialto, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total NICHOLAS M. NIEBLAS 2.288 0 2,288 5.94% LYNN A. HIRTZ 5,705 1 5,706 14.81% JESSE AGUAYO 3,505 0 3,505 9.10% DAVID D. PHILLIPS 3,222 0 3,222 8.36% ANDY CARRIZALES 7,167 2 7,169 18.60% LINDSEY FRETTER 3,165 0 3,165 8.21% RAFAEL TRUJILLO 7,653 0 7,653 19.86% KELVIN MOORE 2,592 0 2,592 6.73% JOE BRITT 3,233 0 3,233 8.39% Total 38,530 3 38,533 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Rialto, City Clerk Cast Votes Votes Total ANA GONZALEZ 10,641 2 10,643 44.15% BARBARA A. MCGEE 13,463 1 13,464 55.85% Total 24,104 3 24,107 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Rialto, City Treasurer Cast Votes Votes Total EDWARD J. CARRILLO 21,940 2 21,942 100.00% Total 21,940 2 21,942 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Twentynine Palms, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total JIM KRUSHAT 1,433 0 1,433 22.43% KEN KING 1,164 0 1,164 18.22% JOEL A. KLINK 1,670 0 1,670 26.14% STEVEN BILDERAIN 2,121 0 2,121 33.20% Total 6,388 0 6,388 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Upland, Mayor Cast Votes Votes Total DEBRA "DEBBIE" K. STONE 16,037 0 16,037 56.52% GLENN BOZAR 12,338 0 12,338 43.48% Total 28,375 0 28,375 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Upland, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total SID ROBINSON 7,313 0 7,313 26-97% JANICE ELLIOTT 7,622 0 7,622 28.10% RICKY FELIX 5,711 0 5,711 21.06% DAN MORGAN 6,474 0 6,474 23.87% Total 27,120 0 27,120 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 13 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary# 20 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 14 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Upland, City Treasurer Cast Votes Votes Total LARRY KINLEY 16,625 0 16,625 62.46% STEPHEN DUNN 9,992 0 9,992 37.54% Total 26,617 0 26,617 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Victorville, City Council Cast Votes Votes Total FRANK KELLY 5,434 1 5,435 8.89% LIONEL M. DEW 8,224 0 8,224 13.45% SERGIO S. REYES 4,668 1 4,669 7.64% JIM COX 9,051 0 9,051 14.81% BLANCA GOMEZ 8,627 1 8,628 14.12% GLORIA GARCIA 10,074 0 10,074 16.48% JERRY J. LAWS 1,003 0 1,003 1.64% JOSHUA MARTIN 3,721. 0 3,721 6.09% RYAN MCEACHRON 7,394 0 7,394 12.10% WILLIAM BERGHOFF 2,923 1 2,924 4.78% Total 61,119 4 61,123 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Yucaipa, City Council, District 3 Cast Votes Votes Total BOBBY DUNCAN 2,025 0 2,025 68.62% CLIFFORD GERICKE 926 0 926 31.38% Total 2,951 0 2,951 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Yucaipa, City Council, District 4 Cast Votes Votes Total DENISE ALLEN-HOYT 2,518 0 2,518 67.67% JORDAN MACK 1,203 0 1,203 32.33% Total 3,721 0 3,721 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Yucaipa, City Council, District 5 Cast Votes Votes Total DICK RIDDELL 3,245 0 3,245 68.58% W. ROBERT FAWKE 1,487 0 1,487 31.42% Total 4,732 0 4,732 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Town of Yucca Valley, Town Council Cast Votes Votes Total JERI E. WILSON 3,079 0 3,079 26.23% ERIC LAMAR QUANDER 1,529 0 1,529 13.03% JEFF DROZD 3,755 0 3,755 31.99% ROBERT E. LOMBARDO 3,375 0 3;375 28.75% Total 11,738 0 11,738 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Big Bear Airport District Cast Votes Votes Total MARK R. KELLY 1,159 0 1,159 7.09% LAWRENCE "LARRY" WINSLOW 2,083 0 2,083 12.73% RICK SEIFERT 2,649 0 2,649 16.19% ANDY ACOSTA 2,425 1 2,426 14.83% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 14 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Division 2 PAUL HOFER SOCORRO ENRIQUEZ JACK LOREN ALLINGHAM RICHARD R. GALVEZ Total San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water Dist, Div 1 ED KILLGORE JUNE D. HAYES MARK J. ALVAREZ Total San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water Dist, Div 2 JOSE A. OLIVAR GIL NAVARRO RANDALL CENICEROS Total Votes Votes Write-in Total Percent of Big Bear Airport District (continued...) Cast Votes Votes Total SUSAN CHAIDEZ 1,076 0 1,076 6.58% STEVE CASTILLO 2,680 0 2,680 16.38% WILLIAM W. "BILL" GODDARD 2,935 0 2,935 17.94% IVAN MCKINLEY 1,350 0 1,350 8.25% Total 16,357 1 16,358 100.00% Total Votes Write-in Total Percent of Big Bear City Community Services District Cast Votes Votes Total LAWRENCE WALSH 2,314 0 2,314 35.03% JOHN RUSSO 2,200 0 2,200 33.30% PAUL E. TERRY 2,092 0 2,092 31.67% Total 6,606 0 6,606 100.00% 0 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Rubidoux Community Services District Cast Votes Votes Total HANK TRUEBA JR 0 0 0 0.00% BERNARD WILLIAM MURPHY 0 0 0 0.00% ARMANDO H. MUNIZ 0 0 0 0.00% CHRIS "ANDY" BARAJAS 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% Total Votes Write-in Total Percent of Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Division 1 Cast Votes Votes Total KATI PARKER 25,252 0 25,252 54.84% TERRY CATLIN 20,798 0 20,798 45.16% Total 46,050 0 46,050 100.00% Inland Empire Utilities Agency, Division 2 PAUL HOFER SOCORRO ENRIQUEZ JACK LOREN ALLINGHAM RICHARD R. GALVEZ Total San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water Dist, Div 1 ED KILLGORE JUNE D. HAYES MARK J. ALVAREZ Total San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water Dist, Div 2 JOSE A. OLIVAR GIL NAVARRO RANDALL CENICEROS Total Votes Write-in Total Percent of Cast Votes Votes Total 14,450 0 14,450 44.78% 6,285 0 6,285 19.48% 2,856 0 2,856 8.85% 8,679 0 8,679 26.89% 32,270 0 32,270 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Cast Votes Votes Total 7,438 0 7,438 24.28% 11,796 0 11,796 38.51% 11,399 1 11,400 37.21% 30,633 1 30,634 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Cast Votes Votes Total 9,013 0 9,013 35.37% 12,202 0 12,202 47.88% 4,267 0 4,267 16.75% 25,482 0 25,482 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 15 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 16 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Hesperia Recreation and Park District Cast Votes Votes Total BOB CHANDLER 16,551 0 16,551 49.23% JOSE GONZALEZ 7,931 0 7,931 23.59% KELLY JAY GREGG 9,138 0 9,138 27.18% Total 33,620 0 33,620 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Beaumont -Cherry Valley Water District, Division 1 Cast Votes Votes Total ANDY RAMIREZ 3 0 3 100.00% JEFFREY LEE COTTRELL 0 0 0 0.00% Total 3 0 3 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Indian Wells Valley Water District Cast Votes Votes Total RON KICINSKI 23 0 23 13.29% C. "CHUCK" CORDELL 34 0 34 19.65% LEROY H. CORLETT 22 0 22 12.72% DONALD J. CORTICHIATO 22 0 22 12.72% CHRISTOPHER MOORE 34 0 34 19.65% MICHAEL JAMES MOWER 25 0 25 14.45% W. "BILL" MANOFSKY 13 0 13 7.51% Total 173 0 173 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Joshua Basin Water District Cast Votes Votes Total GEARY W. HUND 1,899 0 1,899 29.75% MICKEY LUCKMAN 1,290 0 1,290 20.21% RICHARD FOUNTAIN 824 0 824 12.91% DOUGLAS "BUCK" BUCKLEY 1,165 0 1,165 18.25% ROBERT "BOB" JOHNSON 1,205 0 1,205 18.88% Total 6,383 0 6,383 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Yucaipa Valley Water District, Division 1 Cast Votes Votes Total KENNETH P. MUNOZ SR 2,035 0 2,035 45.80% CHRIS MANN 2,407 1 2,408 54.20% Total 4,442 1 4,443 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Mojave Water Agency, Division 3 Cast Votes Votes Total RICHARD D. HALL 9,362 1 9,363 50.85% KEN ANDERSON 9,051 0 9,051 49.15% Total 18,413 1 18,414 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, Division 1 Cast Votes Votes Total RONALD A. DUNCAN 0 0 0 0.00% RICK PIPPENGER 0 0 0 0.00% Total 0 0 0 0.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 16 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Chino Basin Water Conservation District, Div 5 Cast Votes Votes Total GIL ALDACO 9,633 0 9,633 71.06% ELVIN "AL" YOAKUM 3,924 0 3,924 28.94% Total 13,557 0 13,557 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Bear Valley Community Healthcare District Cast Votes Votes Total JOSEPH KELLY 2,686 0 2,686 20.20% JACK P. ROBERTS 2,846 0 2,846 21.41% ROB ROBBINS 3,712 0 3,712 27.92% DONNA NICELY 4,050 0 4,050 30.46% Total 13,294 0 13,294 100.00% YES Votes Write-in Total Percent of Hi -Desert Memorial Health Care District Cast Votes Votes Total JOSEPH P. SULLIVAN 9,003 0 9,003 27.53% MISTY EVANS 5,141 0 5,141 15.72% BOB ARMSTRONG 7,799 0 7,799 23.85% PATRICIA ANN COOPER 4,264 0 4,264 13.04% DIANNE MARKLE-GREEN HOUSE 6,491 0 6,491 19.85% Total 32,698 0 32,698 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 51 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 343,519 0 343,519 54.34% NO 288,604 0 288,604 45.66% Total 632,123 0 632,123 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 52 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 420,499 0 420,499 67.03% NO 206,821 0 206,821 32.97% Total 627,320 0 627,320 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 53 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 347,861 0 347,861 56.32% NO 269,789 0 269,789 43.68% Total 617,650 0 617,650 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 54 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 417,658 0 417,658 67.97% NO 196,780 0 196,780 32.03% Total 614,438 0 614,438 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 55 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 380,803 0 380,803 60.82% NO 245,363 0 245,363 39.18% Total 626,166 0 626,166 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 17 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 YES Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 56 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 367,042 0 367,042 57.44% NO 271,911 0 271,911 42.56% Total 638,953 0 638,953 100.00% YES Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 57 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 360,649 0 360,649 56.26% NO 280,341 0 280,341 43.74% Total 640,990 0 640,990 100.00% YES Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 58 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 443,431 0 443,431 69.53% NO 194,336 0 194,336 30.47% Total 637,767 0 637,767 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 59 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 264,942 0 264,942 43.61% NO 342,537 0 342,537 56.39% Total 607,479 0 607,479 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 60 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 345,356 0 345,356 55.48% NO 277,142 0 277,142 44.52% Total 622,498 0 622,498 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 61 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 262,165 0 262,165 41.45% NO 370,326 0 370,326 58.55% Total 632,491 0 632,491 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 62 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 232,521 0 232,521 36.57% NO 403,387 0 403,387 63.43% Total 635,908 0 635,908 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 63 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 343,605 0 343,605 53.59% NO 297,514 0 297,514 46.41% Total 641,119 0 641,119 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 18 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 64 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 336,736 0 336,736 52.54% NO 304,223 0 304,223 47.46% Total 640,959 0 640,959 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 65 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 257,999 0 257,999 41.40% NO 365,208 0 365,208 58.60% Total 623,207 0 623,207 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 66 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 351,127 0 351,127 57.65% NO 257,972 0 257,972 42.35% Total 609,099 0 609,099 100.00% Alta Loma School District, Measure H Votes Write-in Total Percent of State Proposition 67 Cast Votes Votes Total YES 244,938 0 244,938 39.05% NO 3$2,306 0 382,306 60.95% Total 627,244 0 627,244 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Kern Community College District, Measure J Cast Votes Votes Total BONDS YES 386 0 386 64.77% BONDS NO 210 0 210 35.23% Total 596 0 596 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Barstow Unified School District, Measure F Cast Votes Votes Total BONDS YES 5,776 0 5,776 67.54% BONDS NO 2,776 0 2,776 32.46% Total 8,552 0 8,552 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Chino Valley Unified School District, Measure G Cast Votes Votes Total BONDS YES 34,168 0 34,168 55.99% BONDS NO 26,861 0 26,861 44.01% Total 61,029 0 61,029 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Muroc Joint Unified School District, Measure M Cast Votes Votes Total BONDS YES 6 0 6 60.00% BONDS NO 4 0 4 40.00% Total 10 0 10 100.00% Alta Loma School District, Measure H The Certified Election Results for Measure H are published separately from the Final Certified Results for the 2016 Presidential General Election. December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 19 of 22 BONDS YES Presidential General Election 0 30,996 78.19% November 8, 2016 8,644 0 8,644 Summary Report Total 39,640 0 San Bernardino County 100.00% Votes Summary # 20 Total Percent of City of Adelanto, Measure R Votes Write-in Total Percent of Etiwanda School District, Measure 1 Cast Votes Votes Total BONDS YES 21,387 0 21,387 65.18% BONDS NO 11,427 0 11,427 34.82% Total 32,814 0 32,814 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Ontario -Montclair School District, Measure K Cast Votes Votes Total BONDS YES 30,996 0 30,996 78.19% BONDS NO 8,644 0 8,644 21.81% Total 39,640 0 39,640 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Adelanto, Measure R Cast Votes Votes Total YES 4,031 0 4,031 67.74% NO 1,920 0 1,920 32.26% Total 5,951 0 5,951 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Citv of Adelanto. Measure S Cast Votes Votes Total YES 2,043 0 2,043 34.40% NO 3,896 0 3,896 65.60% Total 5,939 0 5,939 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Town of Apple Valley, Measure V Cast Votes Votes Total YES 17,707 0 17,707 67.65% NO 8,466 0 8,466 32.35% Total 26,173 0 26,173 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Town of Apple Valley, Measure W Cast Votes Votes Total YES 14,879 0 14,879 56.77% NO 11,332 0 11,332 43.23% Total 26,211 0 26,211 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Colton, Measure T Cast Votes Votes Total YES 5,512 0 5,512 43.56% NO 7,142 0 7,142 56.44% Total 12,654 0 12,654 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Rancho Cucamonga, Measure Q Cast Votes Votes Total YES 37,475 0 37,475 63.67% NO 21,381 0 21,381 36.33% Total 58,856 0 58,856 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of San Bernardino, Measure L Cast Votes Votes Total YES 27,478 0 27,478 60.57% NO 17,890 0 17,890 39.43% Total 45,366 0 45,368 100.00% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 20 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 21 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of San Bernardino, Measure N Cast Votes Votes Total YES 24,048 0 24,048 51.10% NO 23,015 0 23,015 48.90% Total 47,063 0 47,063 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of San Bernardino, Measure O Cast Votes Votes Total YES 26,037 0 26,037 55.12% NO 21.196 0 21,196 44.88% Total 47,233 0 47,233 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of San Bernardino, Measure P Cast Votes Votes Total YES 23,106 0 23,106 48.45% NO 24,583 0 24,583 51.55% Total 47,689 0 47,689 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Upland, Measure U Cast Votes Votes Total YES 10,745 0 10,745 35.62% NO 19,419 0 19,419 64.38% Total 30,164 0 30,164 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of City of Victorville, Measure X Cast Votes Votes Total YES 12,105 0 12,105 44.87% NO 14,871 0 14,871 55.13% Total 26,976 0 26,976 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Town of Yucca Valley, Measure Y Cast Votes Votes Total YES 5,594 0 5,594 72.46% NO 2,126 0 2,126 27.54% Total 7,720 0 73720 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Town of Yucca Valley, Measure Z Cast Votes Votes Total YES 6,281 0 6,281 81.24% NO 1,450 0 1,450 18.76% Total 7,731 0 7,731 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Apple Valley Fire Protection District, Measure A Cast Votes Votes Total YES 23,465 0 23,465 77.45% NO 6,831 0 6,831 22.55% Total 30,296 0 30,296 100.00% Votes Write-in Total Percent of Running Springs Water District, Measure B Cast Votes Votes Total YES 910 0 910 45.07% December 6, 2016 9:00 AM Page 21 of 22 Presidential General Election November 8, 2016 Summary Report San Bernardino County Summary # 20 December 6. 2016 9:00 AM Page 22 of 22 Votes Write-in Total Percent of Running Springs Water District, Measure B (continued...) Cast Votes Votes Total NO 11109 0 1,109 54.93% Total 2,019 0 2,019 100.00% December 6. 2016 9:00 AM Page 22 of 22 BY PRECINCT 12/07/16 12:41 PM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Statement of Vote 620 of 1686 November 8,2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION 100078, CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA u z v u z � Qz a � a a N C s o iii •� 1p �pZ{� ���yy Z 67 O N Z s ooN =Iwo cc O1 0 = > CA Z N CQL Y v Y V Y Z N b cu = Q RAN0835 835 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN0835 - Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1028 1028 1350 516 38.22 66 149 48 161 68 165 36 354 353 RAN1028 - Vote by Mail 1350 636 47.11 92 262 51 196 74 232 28 421 445 RAN1029 1029 1605 682 42.49 84 170 61 198 78 205 44 421 434 RAN1029 - Vote by Mail 1605 646 40.25 97 225 61 210 77 204 22 455 462 RAN1030 1030 1589 587 36.94 71 157 51 176 63 172 38 340 363 RAN1030 - Vote by Mail 1589 .740 46.57 118 263 67 224 98 229 39 512 513 RAN1031 1031 1984 614 30.95 84 213 42 183 60 191 37 398 407 RAN1031 -Vote by Mail 1984 996 50.20 157 387 79 340 101 318 50 720 740 RAN1032 1032 1640 597 36.40 82 185 46 185 78 187 43 413 412 RAN1032- Vote by Mail 1640 841 51.28 105 310 69 293 68 300 59 585 604 RAN1033 1033 1569 581 37.03 84 189 49 171 64 162 19 360 379 RAN1033-Vote by Mail 1569 656 41.94 117 223 61 214 81 208 31 465 490 RAN1034 1034 1488 527 35.42 90 163 28 138 75 123 27 344 357 RAN1034 -Vote by Mail 1488 648 43.55 104 270 50 194 106 181 28 467 496 RAN1035 1035 454 139 90.62 25 60 6 37 9 43 2 87 89 RAN1035 - Vote by Mail 454 238 52.42 35 96 16 80 31 67 2 167 173 RAN1036 1036 1255 403 32.11 26 158 22 114 39 161 14 255 260 RAN1036 - Vote by Mail 1255 672 53.55 86 299 44 209 67 251 23 438 458 RAN1037 1037 875 398 45.49 60 130 29 98 52 123 17 254 266 RAN 1037 - Vote by Mail 875 407 46.51 59 151 36 150 61 150 18 320 327 RAN1038 1038 1388 477 34.37 76 149 43 151 40 140 17 303 308 RAN1038-Vote by Mail 1388 625 45.03 127 231 45 221 58 203 30 441 464 RAN1039 1039 738 244 33.06 33 78 19 63 31 83 13 151 168 RAN1039 -Vote by Mail 738 409 55.42 72 157 23 147 50 122 18 299 310 RAN1040 1040 1190 391 32.86 71 139 32 102 46 109 21 254 272 RAN1040 - Vote by Mail 1190 547 45.97 94 174 38 202 72 169 32 370 387 RAN1041 1041 1837 648 35.27 91 218 46 206 68 132 46 445 444 RAN1041 -Vote by Mail 1837 885 48.18 135 348 68 319 109 202 42 641 635 RAN1042 1042 1584 514 32.45 76 160 39 149 61 81 21 337 331 RAN1042 - Vote by Mail 1584 748 47.22 116 257 66 273 104 127 33 503 509 RAN1043 1043 1476 477 32.32 69 146 29 145 71 109 29 313 320 RAN1043 - Vote by Mail 1476 685 46.41 94 258 70 251 113 151 39 505 501 RAN1044 1044 1721 574 33.35 86 197 42 177 80 118 24 409 409 RAN 1044 - Vote by Mail 1721 795 46.19 107 293 56 303 110 187 44 574 581 RAN1045 1045 1848 593 32.09 76 179 57 175 96 119 47 405 414 RAN1045 - Vole by Mail 1848 880 47.62 130 330 54 310 121 211 67 621 615 RAN1046 1046 1592 613 38.51 94 183 36 178 47 176 33 393 393 RAN 1046 - Vote by Mail 1592 705 44.35 108 259 51 289 87 185 37 506 506 RANi047 1047 1726 633 36.67 107 196 51 189 63 141 25 411 418 RAN1047- Vote by Mail 1726 817 47.33 123 314 72 285 105 214 50 572 570 RAN1048 1048 1376 419 30.45 51 137 30 130 51 102 25 264 264 RAN1048 -Vote by Mail 1376 689 50.07 131 276 64 247 82 147 46 483 487 RAN1049 1049 1239 446 36.00 55 152 18 111 61 120 30 284 281 RAN1049 - Vote by Mail 1239 610 49.23 99 233 58 208 90 179 41 449 442 RAN1050 1050 862 296 34.34 38 90 18 92 26 97 19 199 196 RAN1050 - Vote by Mail 662 439 50.93 66 171 36 157 47 156 20 318 320 RAN1051 1051 1568 529 33.74 92 157 69 147 62 104 23 379 381 RANI 051 - Vote by Mail 1568 737 47.00 130 260 75 240 101 166 513 546 641 RAN1052 1052 910 271 29.78 43 62 26 73 37 47 24 187 188 RAN1052 - Vote by Mail 910 331 36.37 52 129 34 92 52 63 36 260 260 RAN1053 1053 910 354 38.90 56 112 24 123 31 93 19 242 244 RAN 1053 - Vote by Mail 910 405 44.62 76 147 34 133 37 109 22 269 268 RAN1054 1054 889 323 36.33 56 95 25 95 27 84 15 187 190 RAN1054 - Vote by Mail 889 443 49.83 71 147 20 132 61 145 20 299 293 RAN1055 1055 1750 670 38.29 79 237 5o 234 84 186 22 466 460 RAN1055 - Vote by Mail 1750 786 44.91 114 322 57 282 103 258 32 583 588 RAN1056 1056 2162 690 31.91 83 240 44 209 98 171 26 445 450 RAN1056 - Vote by Mail 2162 1122 51.90 173 422 75 409 142 256 38 743 733 RAN1057 1057 1466 479 32.67 73 165 43 145 52 149 16 331 323 12/07/16 12:41 PM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Statement of Vote 521 of 1686 November 8,2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION 100078 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w z V z V z z z z s s H s V V V J V = N 0 z V y t� 0 v 0 z 0 V rA 'P V Q O Z z 45 C a tTj - Q °' i -C °r O y v e'�'c Mn p Z z ad Y O ae�e V O ^ ✓W eOp v V V V v a vai Q v v 1�- RAN1057 - Vote by Mail 1466 790 53.89 88 323 63 246 91 273 31 547 545 RAN1058 1058 1616 527 32.81 78 180 28 173 45 164 35 371 368 RAN1058 - Vote by Mail 1616 834 51.61 120 343 54 277 84 261 40 568 579 RAN1059 1059 1195 436 36.49 58 148 32 113 44 147 36 296 300 RAN1059 -Vote by Mail 1195 595 49.79 89 208 53 166 45 229 39 367 379 RAN1050 1060 1586 492 31.02 66 150 50 125 64 145 46 343 349 RAN1060 -Vote by Mal 1586 755 47.60 118 247 45 254 102 242 61 527 522 RAN1061 1061 1576 665 42.20 87 188 54 169 59 201 64 434 434 RAN1061 -Vote by Mail 1576 660 41.88 91 209 45 200 65 253 40 431 435 RAN1062 1062 1589 456 28.82 72 125 32 125 53 95 44 308 309 RANI 062 -Vote by Mail 1589 761 47.89 121 281 62 250 111 148 66 568 564 RAN1063 1063 804 295 36.69 38 83 19 68 56 53 24 197 198 RAN1063-Vote by Mail 804 315 39.18 53 104 24 94 55 69 19 234 231 RAN1064 1064 1567 544 34.72 58 157 41 177 61 116 66 385 393 RAN1064 - Vote by Mail 1567 691 44.10 110 227 69 222 90 223 54 522 523 RAN1065 1065 1612 583 36.17 84 182 40 160 64 173 37 397 399 RAN1066 -Vote by Mail 1612 731 45.35 120 260 64 236 83 214 49 549 545 RAN1066 1066 1740 722 41.49 85 193 45 195 75 280 36 494 497 RAN1066-Vote by Mail 1740 787 45.23 132 253 57 290 90 290 47 592 598 RAN106-1 1067 1310 406 30.99 59 106 28 118 49 123 36 276 283 RAN1067 -Vote by Mall 1310 584 44.58 59 229 41 200 79 178 35 435 437 RAN1068 1068 1680 598 35.60 89 170 56 151 79 124 21 402 402 RAN1068 - Vote by Mail 1680 752 44.76 114 286 69 230 128 178 30 637 539 RAN1069 1069 1676 565 33.71 51 159 49 164 92 120 46 398 399 RAN1069 -Vote by Mail 1676 757 45.17 92 283 56 281 116 173 54 545 546 RAN1070 1070 1491 470 31.52 75 148 52 151 71 101 25 342 336 RAN1070 -Vote by Mail 1491 708 47.48 94 268 56 252 106 197 45 530 526 RAN1071 1071 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1071 - Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1072 1072 1330 459 34.51 64 119 35 115 65 53 57 300 307 RAN1072 - Vote by Mail 1330 523 39.32 86 183 49 164 72 112 46 392 414 RAN1073 1073 514 146 28.40 27 52 16 35 23 31 9 105 104 RAN1073 - Vote by Mail 514 187 36.38 24 62 14 53 26 41 11 134 139 RAN1074 1074 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1074 - Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1075 1075 1343 380 28.29 47 114 32 83 58 46 14 242 251 RAN1075 - Vote by Mail 1343 636 47.36 112 221 58 189 115 115 28 447 474 RAN1076 1076 160 802 37.44 67 163 63 167 86 102 78 414 408 RAN1076 - Vote by Mail 1608 672 41.79 101 239 55 210 96 131 83 504 528 RAN1077 1077 1617 606 33.35 76 177 46 175 88 104 54 404 401 RAN1077 - Vote by Mail 1817 811 44.53 156 323 61 270 1431 155 51 598 611 RAN1078 1078 3 1 33.33 Insufficient Turnout to. Protect Voter Privacy RAN1078-Vote by Mail 3 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1079 1079 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1079 - Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1080 1080 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN 1080 -Vote by Mal 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1081 1081 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RANI 081- Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1082 1082 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1082 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1083 1083 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1083 -Vote by Mail a 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 RAN1568 1568 953 257 26.69 32 66 25 52 50 46 14 169 167 RAW 568 - Vote by Mail 963 378 39.25 61 128 29 111 68 65 13 282 272 RAN1569 1569 436 120 27.52 10 34 5 34 17 32 8 64 86 RAN1569 -Vote by Mail 436 161 36.93 27 62 24 37 25 31 9 114 117 RAN1573 1573 1170 359 30.68 40 97 41 87 56 77 23 256 257 RAN1573 - Vote by Mail 1170 496 42.39 73 168 48 160 69 91 32 353 352 RAN1574 1574 11 3 2727 •"*"••••• Insufficient Turnout to Protect Voter Privacy •••••••• RAN1574 -Vote by Mail 11 6 54.55 01 51 01 31 21 1 11 1 61 1 5 12/07/16 12:41 PM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Statement of Vote 522 of 1686 November 8,2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION 100078 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA g v v d z Qa z z a c v v V t9 J V C = N C O s z s ,� V '« U � a G = m 2 O p- � a K a O z M W a a z m W O C= tT O E r�z z iz m1.2 RAN1735 1735 429 117 27.27 17 48 6 23 23 28 19 78 85 RAN1735 -Vote by Mail 429 218 50.82 27 105 13 79 31 57 11 161 169 RAN1736 1736 577 197 3414 25 69 17 63 34 46 7 127 126 RAN1736 -Vote by Mail 577 219 37.95 50 90 26 67 41 51 10 152 167 RAN1737 1737 451 154 34.15 27 64 12 49 20 64 5 105 114 RANI 737 - Vote by Mail 451 212 47.01 36 87 21 76 14 90 9 146 155 RAN1738 1738 345 128 3710 14 45 9 40 10 46 4 79 86 RAN1738-Vote by Mail 345 147 42.61 27 50 11 39 19 45 4 101 104 RAN1739 1739 471 144 30.57 16 39 14 47 20 36 15 101 99 RAN1739 -Vote by Mail 471 223 47.35 32 75 25 69 27 73 25 158 157 RAN1740 1740 201 63 31.34 6 21 5 25 10 15 4 44 43 RAN1740 - Vote by Mail 201 84 41.79 10 38 7 29 15 20 2 65 67 RAN1741 1741 0 29 0.00 1 6 1 6 4 2 1 9 11 RAN1741 -Vote by Mall 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1742 1742 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1742 - Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1084 1084 49 10 20.41 3 2 0 3 0 2 0 7 5 RAN1084 -Vote by Mail 49 26 53.06 1 5 2 13 7 6 1 21 24 RAN1086 1086 43 15 34.88 1 1 5 3 0 3 2 6 6 RAN1086 - Vote by Mail 43 20 46.51 2 7 0 3 1 9 0 14 1.4 RAN1260 1260 1654 494 29.87 62 177 24 133 45 222 22 304 308 RAN 1260 - Vote by Mail 1654 937 56.65 127 $31 68 237 90 475 46 582 621 RAN1261 1261 1733 573 33.06 88 168 43 180 37 255 18 365 365 RAN1261 -Vote by Mall 1733 932 53.78 145 333 63 310 78 444 25 618 645 RAN1262 1262 1640 544 33.17 53 177 41 186 45 224 25 358 364 RAN1262 - Vote by Mail 1640 874 53.29 143 307 78 337 73 353 43 620 643 RAN1263 1263 1617 596 36 86 99 210 58 182 37 216 34 387 378 RAN 1263 - Vote by Mail 1617 833 51.52 138 323 52 313 63 346 34 573 606 RAN1264 1264 1705 553 32.43 73 199 27 158 53 220 21 345 362 RAN1264 - Vote by Mail 1705 924 54.19 155 361 56 281 77 433 42 607 624 RAN1265. 1265 1787 600 33.58 62 233 43 178 46 270 30 367 378 RAN1265 -Vote by Mail 1787 931 52.10 114 402 63 312 84 432 29 659 673 RAN1266 1266 1557 554 35.58 73 172 39 155 62 140 29 341 351 RAN1266 -Vote by Mail 1557 733 47.08 103 251 65 229 85 260 51 488 514 RAN1267 1267 1581 540 34.16 66 209 36 157 57 205 17 342 355 RAN1267 - Vote by Mail 1581 809 51.17 94 337 62 282 65 313 32 520 540 RAN1272 1272 51 5 9.80 1 2 0 1 0 3 0 3 3 RAN1272 -Vote by Mail 51 31 60.78 2 10 2 10 0 6 2 20 19 RAN1454 1454 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1454 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1455 1455 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1455 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1456 1456 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RAN1456 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Precinct Totals 86569 29695 34.30 4029 9339 2285 8582 3476 6225 1798 19619 19862 Vote by Mail Totals 86569 40885 47.23 6235 15238 3220 13691 5039 12475 2253 28819 29341 Write -In Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Grand Totals 86569 70580 81.53 10264 24577 5505 22273 8515 20700 4051 48438 49204 California 86569 70580 81,53 10264 24577 5505 22273 8515 20700 4051 48438 49204 San Bernardino County 86569 70580 81.53 10264 24577 5505 22273 8515 20700 4051 48436 49204 State Bd ofEqual 1 86569 70580 81.53 10264 24577 5505 22273 8515 20700 4051 48438 49203 U. S. Representative District 27 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U. S. Representative District 31 86569 70580 81.53 10264 24577 5505 22273 8515 20700 4051 48438 49203 U. S. Representative District 35 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senatorial District 20 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senatorial District 23 86569 70580 81.53 10264 24577 5505 22273 8515 20700 4051 48438 49203 Senatorial District 25 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Assembly District 40 73244 59117 80.71 6666 20375 4695 18632 7518 15883 3551 40939 41454 State Assembly District 41 13325 11463 86.03 1598 4202 810 3641 997 4817 500 1 74991 7749 12/07/16 12:41 PM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Statement of Vote 523 of 1686 November 8,2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION —Grand Totals 100078 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4J d � V a V z a Z V � v = 0 0 0 =x .a A o z O = Q Z G r C C a c W uzi H p C H Y Z K Z 2 = cc u T eYe Z > V V V H State Assembly Distnct 52 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - D 0 0 0 SupervisonalDistnct2 86569 70580 81 53 10264 24577 5505 22273 8515 20700 4051 48438 49203 Supervisorial District 4 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga 86569 70580 81.53 10264 24577 5505 22273 8515 20700 4051 48438 49204 12/07/1612:43 PM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Statement of Vote 1646 of 1686 November 8,2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION 140143 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, MEASURE Q C N O •a V H O C QI RAN0835 835 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN0835 - Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1028 1028 1350 $16 38.22 260 163 RAN1028 -Vote by Mail 1350 636 47.11 329 215 RAN1029 1029 1605 682 42.49 345 207 RAN1029 -Vote by Mail 1605 646 40.25 352 194 RAN1030 1030 1589 587 36.94 278 170 RAN1030 -Vote by Mail 1589 740 46.57 383 228 RAN1031 1031 1984 614 30.95 294 214 RAN1031 -Vote by Mail 1984 996 50.20 517 329 RAN1032 1032 1640 597 36.40 323 180 RAN1032 - Vote by Mail 1640 841 51.28 426 285 RAN1033 1033 1569 581 37.03 303 172 RANI 033 -Vote by Mail 1569 658 41.94 345 216 RAN1034 1034 1488 527 35.42 282 149 RAN1034 -Vote by Mail 1488 648 43.55 357 193 RAN1035 1035 454 139 30.62 61 49 RAN 1035 - Vote by Mail 454 238 52.42 129 68 RAN1036 1036 1255 403 32.11 187 149 ' RAN 1036 • Vote by Mail 1255 672 5355 312 269 RAN1037 1037 875 398 45.49 194 133 RAN1037 - Vote by Mail 875 407 46.51 232 135 RAN1038 1038 1388 477 34.37 229 158 RAN1038 -Vote by Mail 1388 625 45.03 352 178 RAN1039 1039 738 244 33.06 130 72 RAN1039 - Vote by Mail 738 409 5542 228 116 RAN1040 1040 1190 391 3286 191 135 RAN 1040 - Vote by Mail 1190 547 45.97 281 178 RAN1041 1041 1837 648 35.27 352 171 RAN1041 -Vote by Mail 1837 885 48.18 526 210 RAN1042 1042 1584 514 32.45 261 124 RAN1042 - Vote by Mail 1584 748 4722 424 178 RAN1043 1043 1476 477 32.32 243 145 RAN1043 - Vote by Mail 1476 685 46.41 390 203 RAN1044 1044 1721 574 33.35 322 146 RAN1044 - Vote by Mail 1721 795 46.19 471 178 RAN1045 1045 1848 593 3209. 336 157 RAN1045 -Vote by Mail 1848 880 47.52 546 199 RAN1046 1046 1592 613 38.51 302 197 RAN1046 - Vote by Mail 1592 706 44.35 377 215 RAN1047 1047 1726 633 36.67 360 154 RAN1047 - Vote by Mail 1726 817 47.33 412 268 RAN1048 1048 1376 419 30.45 208 129 RAN1048 - Vote by Mail 1376 689 50.07 343 217 RAN1049 1049 1239 446 36.00 221 137 RAN1049 -Vote by Mail 1239 610 49.23 378 175 RAN1050 1050 - 862 296 34.34 143 98 RAN1050 -Vote by Mail 862 439 50.93 235 149 RAN1051 1051 1568 529 33.74 289 142 RAN1051 -Vote by Mail 1568 737 47.00 419 200 RAN1052 1052 910 271 29.78 147 69 RAN1052 - Vote by Mail 910 331 36.37 209 84 RAN1053 1053 910 354 38.90 168 123 RAN1053 - Vote by Mall 910 406 44.62 227 106 RAN1054 1054 889 323 36.33 145 106 RAN1054 - Vote by Mail 889 443 49.83 234 132 RAN1055 1055 1750 670 38.29 346 202 RAN1055 - Vote by Mail 1750 786 44.91 427 253 RAN1056 1056 2162 690 31.91 359 198 RAN1056 - Vote by Mail 2162 1122 51,90 620 307 RAN1057 1057 1 1466 479 32.67 1 248 161 12/0711612:43 PM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Statement of Vote 1647 of 1686 November8,2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION 140143 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, MEASURE Q 0 io U C E �p C2 H ai i RAN1057 - Vote by Mail 1466 790 53.89 427 265 RAN1058 1058 1616 527 32.61 269 156 RAN1058 - Vote by Mail 1616 834 51.51 488 249 RAN1059 1059 1195 436 36.49 251 109 RANI 059 - Vote by Mail 1195 595 49.79 323 193 RAN1060 1060 1586 492 31.02 259 154 RANI 060 - Vote by Mail 1586 755 47.60 415 213 RAN1061 1061 1576 665 42.20 318 215 RANI 061 -Vote by Mall 1576 660 41.88 341 218 RAN1062 1062 1589 458 28.82 264 111 RAN 1062 - Vote by Mail 1589 761 47.89 442 197 RAN1063 1053 804 295 36.69 143 87 RAW 063 -Vote by Mail 804 315 39.18 171 103 RAN1064 1064 1567 544 34.72 279 162 RAN1064 - Vote by Mail 1.567 691 44.10 393 210 RAN1066 1065 1612 583 36.17 305 163 RAN1065 -Vote by Mail 1612 731 45.35 392 220 RAN1066 1066 1740 722 41.49 361 226 RAN1066 -Vote by Mail 1740 787 4523 399 286 RAN1067 1067 1310 405 30.99 229 105 RAN1067 - Vote by Mail 1310 584 44.58 324 169 RAN1068 1068 1680 598 35.60 302 149 RAN1068 - Vote by Mail 1688 752 44.76 444 163 RAN1069 1069 1676 566 33.71 309 148 RAN1069 - Vote by Mail 1676 757 45.17 433 193 RAN1070 1070 1491 470 31.52 253 134 RAN1070 - Vote by Mail 1491 708 47.48 397 201 RAN1071 1071 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAW 071 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 1 0 RAN1072 1072 1330 459 34.51 244 126 RAN1072 -Vote by Mail 1330 523 39.32 319 128 RAN1073 1073 514 146 28.40 80 41 RAN1073 -Vote by Mail 514 187 36.38 95 62 RAN1074 1074 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1074 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1075 1075 1343 380 28.29 205 72 RAN1075 -Vote by Mail 1343 638 47.36 351 167 RAN1076 1076 1608 602 37.44 322 157 RAN1076 -Vote by Mail 1608 672 41.79 407 165 RAN1077 1077 1817 608 33.35 322 164 RAN 1077 - Vote by Mail 1817 81.1 44.63 483 216 RAN1078 1078 3 1 33.3 "•"••"" Insufficient Turnout to Protect Voter Privacy '•'• RAN1078 - Vote by Mail 3 a 0.00 0 0 RAN1079 1079 0 0 U0 0 0 RAN1079 - Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1080 1080 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1080 - Vote by Mall 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1081 1081 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1081 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1082 1082 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1082 • Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1083 1083 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1083 - Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1568 1568 963 257 26.69 117 73 RAN1568 - Vote by Mail 963 378 39.25 206 102 RAN1569 1669 436 120 27.52 63 38 RAN1569 - Vote by Mail 436 161 36.93 9239 RAN1573 1573 1170 359 30.68 178 106 RAN1573 -Vote by Mall 1170 496 42.39 2%,123 RAN1574 1574 11 3 27.27 "*•""' Insufficient Turnout to Protect Voter Privacy ••"""" RAN1574 -Vote by Mail 1 11 6 54.55 5 1 12/07/1612:43 PM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Statement of Vote 1648 of 1686 November 8,2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION 140143 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, MEASURE Q c c R O = F z RAN1735 1735 429 117 27.27 61 35 RAN 1735 - Vote by Mail 429 218 50.82 120 65 RAN1736 1736 577 197 34.14 96 64 RAN1736 -Vate by Mail 577 219 37.95 124 64 RAN1737 1737 451 154 34.15 77 63 RAN1737 - Vote by Mail 451 212 47.01 106 69 RAN1738 1738 345 128 37.10 59 43 RAN1738 - Vote, by Mail 345 147 42.61 78 49 RAN1739 1739 471 144 30.57 78 42 RANI 739 - Vote by Mail 471 223 47.35 104 88 RAN1740 1740 201 63 31.34 38 16 RANI 740 - Vote by Mall 201 84 41.79 43 30 RAN1741 1741 0 29 0.00 8 7 RANI 741 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1742 1742 0 0 0.00 0 0 RANI 742 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 _ 0 RAN1084 1064 49 10 20.41 7 0 RAN1084 -Vote by Mail 49 26 53.06 18 7 RAN1086 1086 43 15 34.88 11 2 RANI 086 -Vote by Mail 43 20 46.51 10 9 RAN1260 1260 1654 494 29.87 212 192 RAN1260 - Vote by Mail 1654 937 56.65 442 344 RAN1261 1261 1733 573 33.06 259 228 RAN1261 - Vole by Mail 1733 932 53.78 517 318 RAN1262 1262 1640 544 33.17 256 195 RAN1262-Vote by Mail 1640 874 53.29 464 302 RAN1263 1263 1617 596 36.86 285 226 RAN1263-Vote by Mail 1617 833 51.52 414 307 RAN1264 1264 1705 553 32.43 272 189 RAN1264-vote by Mail 1705 924 54.19 482 326 RAN1265 1265 1787 600 33.58 265 237 RAN1265 -Vote by Mail 1787 931 5210 436 347 RAN1266 1266 1557 554 35.58 278 160 RAN1266 - Vote by Mail 1557 733 47.08 438 195 RAN1267 1267 1581 540 34.16 270 190 RAN1267 - Vote by Mail 1581 809 51.17 400 285 RAN1272 1272 51 5 9,80 2 1 RANI 272 -Vote by Mail 51 31 60.78 17 7 RAN1454 1454 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1464 - Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1455 1455 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1455 -Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 RAN1456 1458 0 0 0,00 0 0 RAN1456-Vote by Mail 0 0 0.00 0 0 Precinct Totals 86569 29695 34.30 15154 8998 Vote by Mail Totals 86569 40885 47.23 22321 12383 Grand Totals 86569 70580 81.53 37475 21381 Calitomia 86569 70580 81.53 37475 21381 San BernardinoCounty 86569 70580 81.53 37475 21381 State Bd of Equal 1 86569 70580 81.53 37475 21381 U. S. Representative Distad 27 0 0 0.00 0 0 U. S. Representative District 31 86569 70580 81.53 37475 21381 U. S. Representative District 35 0 0 0.00 0 Senatorial District 20 0 0 0.00 0 0 Senatorial Distact 23 86569 70580 81.53 37475 21361 Senatorial District 25 0 0 0,00 0 State Assembly Distad 40 73244 59117 80.71 31766 17332 State Assembly District 41 13325 11463 86.03 1 57091 404 12/07/1612:43 PM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY Statement of Vote 1649 of 1686 November 8,2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION —Grand Totals 140143 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, MEASURE Q c � U ea O C Cn m w Stale Assembly District 52 0 0 0.00 0 0 Supervisonal Distnct 2 8656970580 81.53 37475 21381 SupervlsonalDistrict 4 0 0 0.00 0 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga 86569 70580 81.53 37475 21381 fnfe of fdnfifarnin CIJummission un Tubicial 19erformance 455 (15u1ben (Sae benne, Suite 1441011 San 3�ranrisrv, TA 94102-3850 (415) 557-1200 FAX (415) 557-1266 Web Site: http://cjp.ca.gov October 26, 2016 Honorable Jeffrey King, Retired 8730 King Ranch Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Dear Justice King: Enclosed is the certification you requested. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to telephone. VBH:mh Enclosure Very truly yours, VIC ORIA B. HEN] Director -Chief Couns... tate of (tttifornia Tm=ission on JPubicial I erformaure 455 (Salben (Sate Afienue, Sni#e 144011 �rxn �rttnrisca, C�� 941112-3060 (415) 557-1200 FAX (415) 557-1266 Web Site: http://cjp.ca.gov CERTIFICATION The Commission on Judicial Performance hereby certifies that JUSTICE JEFFREY KING, RETIRED is authorized to administer oaths and affirmations pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2093 and Government Code section 1225 for a period of five years from the date of this certification. Dated: October 26, 2016 § 2093. Persons authorized to administer oaths and affirmations, CA CIV PRO § 2093 West's Ann.Cal.C.C.P. § 2093 §29,93. Persons authorized to administer oaths and affirmations Effective: January 1, 2017 Currentness (a) A court, judge or clerk of a court, justice, notary public, and officer or person authorized to take testimony in an action or proceeding, or to decide upon evidence, has the power to administer oaths and affirmations. (b)(1) A shorthand reporter certified pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 8020) of Chapter 13 of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code has the power to administer oaths and affirmations and may perform the duties of the deposition officer pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2025.010) of Title 4. The certified shorthand reporter is entitled to receive fees for services rendered during a deposition, including fees for deposition services, as specified in subdivision (c) of Section 8211 of the Government Code. (2) This subdivision shall also apply to depositions taken by telephone or other remote electronic means as specified in Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 2017.010) and Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 2025.010) of Title 4. (c)(1) A former judge or justice of a court of record in the state who retired or resigned from office shall have the power to administer oaths and affirmations, if both of the following conditions are met: (A) The former judge or justice requests and receives a certification from the Commission on Judicial Performance pursuant to paragraph (2). (B) A formal disciplinary proceeding was not pending at the time of the retirement or resignation. (2)(A) A former judge or justice of a court of record in the state who retired or resigned from office may apply to the Commission on Judicial Performance to receive a certification to administer oaths and affirmations. The commission shall W STI, W C 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. § 2093. Persons authorized to administer oaths and affirmations, CA CIV PRO § 2093 supply the required forms to an applicant upon request. (B)(i) A certification application shall be accompanied by a medical certification. If an applicant's medical certification indicates the applicant does not have a medical condition that would impair his or her ability to administer oaths and affirmations, the commission shall issue a certification to the applicant to administer oaths and affirmations. Except as provided in clause (ii), a certification issued pursuant to this paragraph is valid for a period of five years from the date of issuance. (ii) If an applicant's medical certification indicates the applicant has a medical condition that may impair his or her ability to administer oaths and affirmations, but does not do so at the time the medical certification is submitted with the application, the commission shall issue a certification to administer oaths and affirmations, but the certification is only valid for a period of two years from the date of issuance. (3) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a former judge or justice of a court of record who received a certification from the Commission on Judicial Performance before January 1, 2016, to administer oaths and affirmations may continue to exercise this power until January 1, 2017, at which time he or she shall reapply for certification pursuant to paragraph (2). (4) The Commission on Judicial Performance may charge a regulatory fee not to exceed fifteen dollars ($15) for each certification application submitted pursuant to this subdivision to cover its costs, including costs to review the medical certification. (d) A rule or regulation regarding the confidentiality of proceedings of the Commission on Judicial Performance does not prohibit the commission from issuing a certificate as provided for in this section. Credits (Enacted in 1872. Amended by Stats. 1986, c. 1417, § 3; Stats. 1986, c. 1418, § 1.3; Stats. 1988, c. 1032, § 1; Stats.2001, c. 812 (A.B.223), § 12; Stats.2004, c. 182 (A.B.3081), § 24, operative July 1, 2005; Stats.2015, c. 308 (A.B.1028), § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2016; Stats.2016, c. 86 (S.B.1171), § 46, eff. Jan. 1, 2017.) Editors' Notes LAW REVISION COMMISSION COMMENTS 2004 Amendment Subdivision (b) of Section 2093 is amended to reflect nonsubstantive reorganization of the rules governing civil discovery. [33 Cal.L.Rev.Comm. Reports 1010 (2004)]. WESTLAW @ 2016 Thomson neuters. No claim to original US. Government Works. 2 § 2093. Persons authorized to administer oaths and affirmations, CA CIV PRO § 2093 Notes of Decisions containing your search ten -ns (0) View all 26 West's Ann. Cal. C.C.P. § 2093,1CA CIV PRO § - Current with all 2016 Reg.Sess. laws, Ch. 8 of 2015-2016 2nd Ex.Sess., and all propositions on 2016 ballot. End of Document Gc` 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. WESTLAW @ 2016 Thomson Relaters. No claim to original US, Government Works. 3 § 1225. Officers authorized to administer and certify oaths, CA GOVT § 1225 notated California Codes nent Code (Refs & Annos) L. General ision 4. Public Officers and Employees (Refs & Annos) 'ha ter 1. General ,7ticle'8. Miscellaneous West's Ann.Cal.Gov.Code § "i225 § 212,i. Officers authorized to administer and certify oaths Effective: January 1, 2oi6 to December 31, 2o16 Currentness (a) An executive officer, a judicial officer, and a Member of the Legislature may administer and certify oaths. (b)(1) A former judge of a court of record in this state who retired or resigned from office shall be deemed a judicial officer for purposes of this section, if he or she satisfies the conditions set forth is subdivision (c) of Section 2093 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (c) A law, rule, or regulation regarding the confidentiality of proceedings of the Commission on Judicial Performance shall not be construed to prohibit the commission from issuing a certificate as provided for in this section. Credits (Added by Stats.1951, c. 655, p. 1851, § 22. Amended by Stats.1959, c. 218, p. 2126, § 1; Stats.1986, c. 1418, § 1.5; Stats.2015, c. 308 (A.B.1028), § 2, eff. Jan. 1, 2016.) NOTES OF DECISIONS Validity C.C.P. § 2093 and Gov.Code § 25 are constitutional in requiring the Commission on Judicial Performance to issue certifications under specified conditions. 70 Op.Atty.Gen. 113, June 2, 1987. West's Ann. Cal. Gov. Code § 1.225, CA GOVT § ;1225 Current with all 2016 Reg.Sess. laws, Ch. 8 of 2015-2016 2nd Ex.Sess., and all propositions on 2016 ballot. End of Document O 2016 Thornson Renters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. WE TLAW O 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA Proclamation WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga endeavors to preserve and protect buildings and sites in the City which are deemed to have historical significance; and WHEREAS, Cucamonga Service Station was built by Henry Klusman during the earlyyears of Cucamonga and is the last station reminiscent ofthe roadside architecture ofthe 1920's, 30's and 40's; and WHEREAS, since its designation as a historical site in 2009 by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Route 66 Inland Empire California (LECA) none ofit organization has been working to restore Cucamonga Service Station to its former glory; and WHEREAS, the Cucamonga Service Station restoration is a community effort, with many volunteers helping to breathe new l fe into this iconic piece of Cucamonga history; and WHEREAS, The California Preservation Foundation was organized in 1977 by preservationists who saw a need to join forces in order to save important California landmarks and neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the California Preservation Foundation celebrates and recognizes exemplary work in historic preservation, restoration, rehabilitation, and other significant categories through the Preservation Design Awards; and WHEREAS, the California Preservation Foundation has awarded Cucamonga Service Station with a 2016 Preservation Design Award; and WHEREAS, as a 2016 Preservation Design Award winner, Cucamonga Service Station stands out as a project that represents California's diverse culture and history in the built environment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby commend Route 66 IECA and their many volunteers who designed and restored the Cucamonga Service Station and congratulates them for winning the California Preservation Foundation's 2016 Preservation Design Award.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, have hereunto set their hand and caused the seal of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to be nffixed this 7" day of December, 2016 Dennis Mic.•hae Mayor Sam Sp*ol WilliamJ. Al . anderMayor PCouncil ember ly2n!±n�el Kennedy Diane Williams December i. 2016 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFICATE OF�COGNITION The City of Rancho Cucamonga is proud to recognize: EvELYN E. PERKINS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION For your commitment to helping students succeed after high school and, for awarding over $30, 000 in scholarships over the last 10 years L. Dennis Micha Sam gn Mayor Mayor Pro em Will' dm J. Alexander LynA B. Kennedy Diane Williams Council Member Council Member Council Member CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P1 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/8/20 16 through 11/28/20 16 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00006545 11/09/2016 CALIF GOVERNMENT VE13A/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 107610.00 0.00 10,610.00 All 00006546 11/08/2016 MICHAEL. L. DENNIS 784.32 0.00 784.32 All 00006547 11/08/2016 RCCEA 1,684.00 0.00 1,684.00 All 00006548 11/08/2016 RCPI�A 11,216.04 0.00 11,216.04 All 00006549 11/16/2016 CITIGROUP ENERGY INC 296,153.46 0.00 296,153.46 AP 00006550 11/16/2016 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,484.00 0.00 61484.00 All 00006551 11/16/2016 SAN I3ERNARDINO COUNTY 1.812.00 0.00 1,812.00 AP 00006552 11/16/2016 SEMPRA GENERATION LLC 15,070.00 0.00 15.070.00 All 00006553 11/16/2016 VIASYN INC 1,690.00 0.00 1,690.00 AP 00006554 11/22/2016 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC. 23,762.26 0.00 23.762.26 All 00006555 11/22/2016 CALIF GOVERNMENT VERA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10,610.00 0.00 10,610.00 AP 00006556 11/22/2016 FORTISTAR METHANE GROUP LLC 82.570.44 0.00 82.570.44 AP 00006557 11/22/2016 RCCEA 1,684.00 0.00 11684.00 All 00006558 11/22/2016 RCPFA 11,319.50 0.00 11,319.50 All 00006559 11/22/2016 SAN 13ERNARDINO COUNTY 42.00 0.00 42.00 All 00371603 11/08/2016 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1,237.58 0.00 1,237.58 All 00374604 11/08/2016 AAA ELECTRIC MOTOR SALES 79.11 0.00 79.11 All 00374605 11/08/2016 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 62,454.71 0.00 62,454.71 All 00374606 11/08/2016 ADAMS, BLANCA 50.00 0.00 50.00 All 00374607 11/08/2016 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 AP 00371608 11/08/2016 ALL CITIES TOOLS 0.00 365.79 365.79 All 00374609 11/08/2016 ALL WELDING 2.155.00 0.00 2.155.00 All 00374610 11/08/2016 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC. 100.00 0.00 100.00 All 0037,1611 1 1/08/2016 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 2.478.80 0.00 2.478.80 All 00374612 11/08/2016 ALPHAGRAPHICS 183.58 0.00 183.58 All 00374613 11/08/2016 AMTECI-I ELEVATOR SERVICES 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00374614 11/08/2016 APPLIED CONCEPTS 355.95 0.00 355.95 All 00374615 11/08/2016 APPLIED METERING TECHNOLOGIES INC 12,232.88 0.00 12,232.88 All 00374616 11/08/2016 ARCI-IrrERRA DESIGN GROUP 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 All 00374617 11/08/2016 ASSI SECURITY 2,305.00 0.00 2,305.00 All 00374618 11/08/2016 AT&T MOBILITY 0.00 83.30 83.30 AP 00374619 11/08/2016 AUNTIE M CREATIVE CONSULTANTS INC. 547.65 0.00 547.65 All 00374620 11/08/2016 AYSO RL'GION 65 62.50 0.00 62.50 All 00374621 11/08/2016 [SANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, THE 1.750.00 0.00 1.750.00 All 00371622 11/08/2016 BERTON. DANIELA 91.31 0.00 91.31 All 00374623 11/08/2016 BRAUN BLAISING MCLAUGHLIN 2,301.10 0.00 2,301.10 All 00374624 11/08/2016 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 18,362.15 0.00 18,362.15 All 00374626 11/08/2016 C V W D 68,157.69 143.16 68,300.85 *** All 00374627 11/08/2016 CAL PERS LONG TERM CARE 294.91 0.00 294.91 All 00374628 11/08/2016 CALIFORNIA. STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 All 00374629 11/08/2016 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 All 00374630 11/08/2016 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 233.59 0.00 233.59 All 00374631 11/08/2016 CALIFORNIA. STATE OF 75.00 0.00 75.00 All 00374632 11/08/2016 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 3,367.27 199.74 3,567.01 *** All 00374633 11/08/2016 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 0.00 244.76 244.76 All 00374634 11/08/2016 CARSON, DANIEL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00374635 11/08/2016 CAZARES. ALBERTO 200.00 0.00 200.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 11/29/2016 12eport: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P2 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AE!enda Check Register 1 1/8/2016 throu?11 11/28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount All 00374636 11/08/2016 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 12,958.90 0.00 12,958.90 AP 00374637 11/08/2016 CI-IAN..l01-INLAY L. 531.00 0.00 531.00 AP 00374638 11/08/2016 CHINO MOWER AND L'NGINIE SERVICE 933.30 0.00 933.30 AP 00374639 11/08/2016 CINTAS CORPORATION # 150 0.00 313.63 313.63 AP 00374640 11/08/2016 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 745.00 0.00 745.00 AP 00374641 11/08/2016 CLERK OP THE. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2,260.25 0.00 2.260 25 AP 00374642 11/08/2016 CLF WAREI-IOUSE 0.00 429.79 429.79 All 00374643 11/08/2016 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 550.00 0.00 550.00 AI' 00374644 11/08/2016 CONFIRE.IPA 0.00 52,606.58 52.606.58 AP 00374645 11/08/2016 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 475.20 0.00 475.20 AP 00374646 11/08/2016 CORDERO. MARIA 54.94 0.00 54.94 AP 00374647 11/08/2016 CRUTCHFIELD,.IAYLEN 275.00 0.00 275.00 AF' 00374648 11/08/2016 DAVE PYCZ CONSTRUCTION INC. 201.50 0.00 201.50 All 00374649 11/08/2016 DAVIS 17AIZIt LLP 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 All 00374650 11/08/2016 DECKER, CONNIE 64.33 0.00 64.33 All 00374651 11/08/2016 DELTA DENIAL 17524.32 0.00 1,524.32 All 00374652 11/08/2016 DELTA DENTAL 41,218.04 0.00 41,218.04 All 00374653 11/08/2016 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 263.04 0.00 263.04 AP 00374654 11/08/2016 DIAZ, LORI 67.36 0.00 67.36 All 00374655 11/08/2016 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 239.31 0.00 239.31 AP 00374656 11/08/2016 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 1.522.58 256.50 1,779.08 *** AP 00374657 11/08/2016 EMBROIDME 1,895.68 77.76 1,973.44 *** AP 00374658 11/08/2016 EXPRESS CONTRACTORS INC. 39.96 0.00 39.96 All 00374659 11/08/2016 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 559.49 559.49 AI' 00374660 11/08/2016 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 35.21 0.00 35.21 All 00374661 11/08/2016 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 11.50 0.00 11.50 AI' 00374662 11/08/2016 FIRE ETC. 0.00 6.548.60 6.548.60 AP 00374663 11/08/2016 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 449.87 449.87 AP 00374664 11/08/2016 FONTANA RADIATOR SERVICE 0.00 2,462.40 2,462.40 All 00374666 11/08/2016 FRONTIER COMM 11,307.80 973.40 12,281.20 *** AP 00374667 11/08/2016 FRONTIER COMM 104.04 0.00 104.04 AP 00374668 11/08/2016 GEOGRAPHICS 3,245.88 0.00 3,245.88 AI' 00374669 11/08/2016 GILKEY, JOHN 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00374670 11/08/2016 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 0.00 431.61 431.61 All 00374671 11/08/2016 GRAFIX SYSTEMS 0.00 336.07 336.07 AP 00374672 11/08/2016 GRAINGER 4,173.23 115.99 4,289.22 *** AP 00374673 11/08/2016 GRAY13AR 1,288.23 0.00 1,288.23 AP 00374674 11/08/2016 HANSON, SUZANNE 540.00 0.00 540.00 All 00374675 11/08/2016 HEARTSAVERS LLC 1,875.00 0.00 1,875.00 AP 00374676 11/08/2016 HENRIKSON OWEN & ASSOC INC. 3,427.76 0.00 3,427.76 AP 00374677 11/08/2016 HIGH DESERT OPPORTUNITIES 3,268.00 0.00 3,268.00 All 00374678 11/08/2016 HOLLAND, BRANDIE 180.00 0.00 180.00 AI' 00374679 11/08/2016 HOSE MAN INC 112.09 338.53 450.62 *** AP 00374680 11/08/2016 F-IOY"r LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 33.49 33.49 AP 00374681 11/08/2016 HUGHES_. DEBRA 32.09 0.00 32.09 All 00374682 11/08/2016 ICMA 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 All 00374683 11/08/2016 INLAND COUNTIES EMERGENCY MEDICAL AGENCY 0.00 8.000.00 8,000.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLI DATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P3 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AEenda Check Register 11 /8/2016 through 11 /28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount All 00374684 11/08/2016 INLAND EMPIRE "POURS AND TRANSPORTATION 1.263.00 0.00 1.263.00 All 00374685 11/08/2016 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 17.11 0.00 17.11 All 00374686 11/08/2016 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY =1,401.60 0.00 4.401.60 AP 00374687 11/08/2016 INTEGRITY DOOR & HARDWARE INC 1.237.07 0.00 1,237.07 All 00374688 11/08/2016 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 121.06 0.00 121.06 All 00374689 11/08/2016 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 1,268.54 0.00 1.268.54 A1' 00374690 11/08/2016 IRON MOUN'T'AIN OSDP 793.58 0.00 793.58 All 00374691 11/08/2016 ITE -'RIS INC 1.134.00 0.00 1.134.00 AP 00374692 11/08/2016 JOHN BURR CYCLES INC 1,511.32 0.00 1,511.32 All 00374693 11/08/2016 .ZONES AND MAYER. LAW OF1710ES Of 3,376.00 0.00 3,376.00 All 00374694 11/08/2016 KELLER WILLIAMS REALTY RANC140 CUCAMONGA 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00374695 11/08/2016 KENNEDY EQUIPMEN"1- INC 1.033.35 0.00 1,033.35 AP 00374696 11/08/2016 KIMBALL MIDWEST 721.35 0.00 721.35 All 00374697 11/08/2016 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 150.00 0.00 150.00 All 00374698 11/08/2016 LIFE ASSISI' INC 0.00 429.03 429.03 All 00374699 11/08/2016 LIGI-TTI-IOUSE. TI -I1 0.00 81.86 81.86 All 00374700 11/08/2016 LOS ANGELES FREIGHTLINER 0.00 440.64 440.64 All 00374701 11/09/2016 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 0.00 20.09 20.09 All 00374702 11/08/2016 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 5.298.51 0.00 5.298.51 All 00374703 11/08/2016 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 80,918.83 4,105.70 85.024.53 *** AP 00374704 11/08/2016 MASTERS ELECTRIC 5.719.10 0.00 5,719.10 All 00374705 11/08/2016 MICHAEL PELLETIER 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00374706 11/08/2016 MIDWESTTAPE 2,085.85 0.00 2,085.85 All 00374707 11/08/2016 NAPA AUTO PARTS 44.82 170.02 214.84 *** AP 00374708 11/08/2016 NLS LIGHTING 7,030.80 0.00 7,030.80 All 0037,1711 11/08/2016 OFFICE DEPOT 4,532.60 0.00 4,532.60 All 00374712 11/08/2016 OLDCASTLE PRECAST INC 100.00 0.00 100.00 A1' 00371713 11/08/2016 P S S BUILDING MATERIALS 223.49 0.00 223.49 AP 00374714 11/08/2016 PADILLA. ERIC 500.00 0.00 500.00 All 00374715 11/08/2016 PAGDILAO. MARK 53.99 0.00 53.99 All 00374716 11/08/2016 PA"T"TON SALES CORP 225.50 0.00 225.50 AP 00374717 11/08/2016 PEN.TI-IF-RESA 116.58 0.00 11658 AP 00374718 11/08/2016 PHOENIX GROUP INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1,773.26 0.00 1,773.26 All 00374719 11/08/2016 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 96.59 0.00 96.59 All 00374720 11/08/2016 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1.778.70 0.00 1,778.70 All 00374721 11/08/2016 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 118.79 118.79 AP 00374722 11/08/2016 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 598.35 0.00 598.35 AP 00374723 11/08/2016 PSA PRINT GROUP 155.52 0.00 155.52 All 00374724 11/08/2016 PW GILLIBRAND INC 2,163.66 0.00 2,163.66 AP 00374725 11/08/2016 QUALITY TRUCK ELECTRIC INC 0.00 734.40 734.40 All 00374726 11/08/2016 RADSTONE, TERESITA 84.13 0.00 84.13 AP 00374727 11/08/2016 RANCI-10 REGIONAL VETERINARY HOSPITAL INC 174.58 0.00 17458 AP 00374728 11/08/2016 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 19.71 0.00 19.71 All 00374729 11/08/2016 RCPD RESERVE UNIT 134 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 All 00374730 11/08/2016 REGENCY ENTERPRISES INC 1,451.52 0.00 1,451.52 AP 00374731 11/08/2016 RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT FABRCTR 1,028.30 0.00 1,028.30 All 00374732 11/08/2016 RODRIGUEZ INC, RY 0.00 777.10 777.10 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG- PORTRAIT-CON SOL IDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P4 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT A1?enda Check Register 11/8/2016 throujh 11/28/2016 Check No. Check Dane Vendor Name Citi, Fire Amount All 00374733 11/08/2016 SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC 198.93 0.00 198.93 AP 0037,1734 11/08/2016 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 7.057.50 0.00 7,057.50 AP 00374735 11/08/2016 SAN BERNARDINO CTY EMS NURSES NETWORK 0.00 180.00 180.00 Al' 00374736 11/08/2016 SAN 1317RNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 250.00 250.00 500.00 *** AP 00374737 11/08/2016 SBPEA 959.04 0.00 959.04 All 00374738 11/08/2016 SC FUELS 0.00 12.084.91 12.084.91 All 00374739 11/08/2016 SEX'T'ON. SHEILA 3.00 0.00 3.00 All 0037470 11/08/2016 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 446.95 0.00 446.95 A1' 00374741 11/08/2016 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 84,364.87 0.00 84,364.87 AP 00374742 11/08/2016 SIERRA PACIFIC ELECTRICAL CONT 2.004.50 0.00 2.004.50 All 00374743 11/08/2016 SIGN SI -IOP. TI -IE 10.80 0.00 10.80 All 00374744 11/08/2016 SOCIAL. VOCATIONAL SERVICES 3,388.00 0.00 3,388.00 All 00371745 11/08/2016 SOLARMAX TECHNOLOGY INC 231.00 0.00 231.00 All 00374750 11/08/2016 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31,739.16 1.587.14 33.326.30 *** All 00371751 11/08/2016 SOUTI-ILAND FARMERS MARKETASSOC INC 313.00 0.00 313.00 AP 00374752 11/08/2016 SPORTBALE LLC 1,942.50 0.00 1,942.50 AP 00371753 11/08/2016 S-1.01.7_ EQUIPMENT 1;301.15 0.00 1,301.15 All 00371754 11/08/2016 STOVER SEED COMPANY 2.057.41 0.00 2,057.41 All 00374755 11/08/2016 STREAMI-,INE PRESS INC 137.16 0.00 137.16 All 00374756 11/08/2016 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 781.65 781.65 All 00374757 11/08/2016 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC 1,281.60 0.00 1,281.60 All 00374758 11/08/2016 SUNI'IME•' FNL'RGY BUILDERS 36.62 0.00 36.62 All 00374759 11/08/2016 SYSCO LOS ANGELES INC 56491 0.00 564.91 All 00374760 11/08/2016 THOMAS, CARI 728.75 0.00 728.75 All 00374761 11/08/2016 TI-IOIvIPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY 2.240.56 0.00 2,240.56 All 00374762 11/08/2016 TOT LOT PROS INC 79.526.00 0.00 79,526.00 All 00374763 11/08/2016 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 243.27 0.00 243.27 All 00371764 11/08/2016 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 25,614.00 0.00 25,614.00 All 00374765 11/08/2016 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 230.52 0.00 230.52 AP 00374766 11/08/2016 UNITEDTALENT AGENCY I -LC 6,000.00 0.00 6,000.00 All 00374767 11/08/2016 UNITED WAY 136.00 0.00 136.00 AP 00374768 11/08/2016 UNIVERSAL MAR'T'IAL ARTS CENTERS 252.70 0.00 252.70 All 00374769 11/08/2016 VERENGO INC 60.19 0.00 60.19 AP 00374770 11/08/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 2.471.21 2,471.21 All 0037,1771 11/08/2016 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 199.95 1.678.20 1.878.15 *** All 00374772 11/08/2016 WAITERS WI-IOEESALE I EECTRIC CO 3.843.63 115.53 3,959.16 *** All 00374773 11/08/2016 WAXIE SANI'T'ARY SUPPLY 67547.02 1,677.78 8,224.80 *** All 00374774 11/08/2016 WESTFIELD LTD 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00374775 11/08/2016 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 0.00 320.59 320.59 All 00374776 11/08/2016 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00374777 11/08/2016 WHITE NELSON DIEHL EVANS LLP 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00374778 11/09/2016 ABC LOCKSMITHS 29.16 0.00 29.16 AP 00374779 11/09/2016 AIRGAS USA LLC 80.98 0.00 80.98 AP 00374785 11/09/2016 BRODART BOOKS 5,496.16 0.00 5,496.16 AP 00374786 11/09/2016 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 334.61 0.00 334.61 All 00374787 11/09/2016 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 118.60 0.00 118.60 AP 00374788 11/09/2016 FASTENAL COMPANY 30.62 0.00 30.62 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK -AG ENDA-REG _PORTRAIT_CONSOLI DATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCT10 CUCAMONGA P5 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11/8/2016 through 11/28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount All 00374789 11/09/2016 I-IOLLIDAYROCK COINC 2.160.02 0.00 2,160.02 All 110371790 11/09/2016 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 7,529.86 0.00 7.529.86 All 00374791 11/09/2016 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 1,224.08 0.00 1,224.08 All 00374792 11/09/2016 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 129.38 129.38 All 00374793 11/09/2016 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 877.00 0.00 877.00 All 00374794 11/16/2016 AISLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19,783.44 0.00 19.783.44 All 00371795 11/16/2016 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 '100.00 AP 00374796 11/16/2016 ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP. 33.428.59 0.00 33.428.59 All 00374797 11/16/2016 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCIE 10.966.56 0.00 10.966.56 All 00374798 11/16/2016 AL131---RTA. WEB13 2.062.50 0.00 2,062.50 All 00374799 11/16/2016 ALLEN. DEBORAH 144.41 0.00 1441.41 AP 00374800 11/16/2016 ALLIED BARTON SECURITY SERVICES LLC 227475.70 0.00 22.475.70 AP 00374801 11/16/2016 ALLIED NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC 13,083.13 0.00 13.083.13 AP 00374802 11/16/2016 AMTECI-I ELEVATOR SERVICES 936.74 0.00 936.74 AP 00374803 11/16/2016 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 All 00374804 11/16/2016 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 2.475.39 0.00 2,475.39 AP 00374805 11/16/2016 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 62.65 0.00 62.65 AP 00374806 11/16/2016 BARNETI-, MARK 500.00 0.00 500.00 All 00374807 11/16/2016 BA"I-ITRY POWER INC 50.02 0.00 50.02 AP 00374808 11/16/2016 131E1-IAVIOIZ ANALYSIS TRAINING INSTITUTE 690.00 0.00 690.00 AP 00374809 11/16/2016 BEST BEST AND KRIEGER 457.50 0.00 457.50 All 00374810 11/16/2016 BMC SOFTWARE INC 6,404.16 0.00 6,404.16 All 0037,1811 11/16/2016 131ZIDGES BEAUTY COLLEGE 76.45 0.00 76.45 All 00374812 11/16/2016 BRIG1-ITVIL'W LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 307.33 0.00 307.33 All 00374813 11/16/2016 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 35.00 0.00 35.00 All 00374814 11/16/2016 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL 0.00 542.42 542.42 All 00374815 11/16/2016 CEBALLOS. LINDA 4.00 0.00 4.00 All 00374816 11/16/2016 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 75.00 270.31 345.31 *** All 00374817 11/16/2016 CHILDREN'S MONTESSORI SCI -TOOL 64.14 0.00 64.14 AP 00374818 11/16/2016 Cl RANCI-10 II LLC 80,416.31 0.00 80,416.31 All 00374819 11/16/2016 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 163.24 163.2.4 AP 00374820 11/16/2016 CLARY CORPORATION 48.796.95 0.00 48.796.95 All 00374821 11/16/2016 CLEAR COASTCONSTRUCTION 352.36 0.00 352.36 All 00374822 11/16/2016 CLEARWATER GRAPHICS INC 1,262.87 0.00 1,262.87 All 00374823 11/16/2016 CLIMATEC LLC 5.704.74 0.00 5,704.74 All 00374824 11/16/2016 COMMUNITY BANK 3,437.27 0.00 3,437.27 All 00374825 11/16/2016 CONSER, RICHARD 7.62 0.00 7.62 All 00374826 11/16/2016 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 699.84 0.00 699.84 All 00374827 11/16/2016 CPRS 310.00 0,00 310.00 All 00374828 11/16/2016 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 0.00 540.00 All 003741829 11/16/2016 CROP PRODUCTION SERVICES INC 1.878.11 0.00 1,878.11 All 00374830 11/16/2016 D M CONTRACTING INC 159.645.03 0.00 159.645.03 All 00374831 11/16/2016 DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS 115.00 0.00 115.00 AP 00374832 11/16/2016 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 9,078.00 0.00 9.078.00 AP 00374833 11/16/2016 DUKE PACIFIC INC. 909.80 0.00 909.80 AP 00374834 11/16/2016 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 5,648.00 0.00 5,648.00 AP 00374835 11/16/2016 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 0.00 182.00 182.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT-CON SOL IDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I Time: 16:13:15 CTTY OF RANCHO CUCAIYIONGA P6 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT A1Jenda Check Register 11/8/20 16 through 11/28/20 16 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount All 00374836 11/16/2016 ENGELKE. LINDA 42.00 0.00 42.00 All 00374837 11/16/2016 ENVIRONMENTAL RECOVERY SERVICES INC. 1.929.13 0.00 1.929.13 AP 00374838 11/16/2016 ERGON ASPHALT AND EMULSIONS 171.53 0.00 171.53 All 00374839 1 1/16/2016 ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION 0.00 85.333.33 85.333.33 AP 00374840 11/16/2016 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 All 00374841 11/16/2016 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.75 0.00 21.75 All 00374842 11/16/2016 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.71 0.00 20.71 All 00374843 11/16/2016 FERNANDEZ. G\VYNETI-I 68.25 0.00 68.25 AP 00374844 11/16/2016 FINCHER. VERONICA 1,320.00 0.00 1,320.00 AP 00374845 11/16/2016 FLAWLESS PHOTO BOOTH 259.00 0.00 259.00 All 00374846 11/16/2016 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 2.500.00 0.00 2.500.00 All 00374847 11/16/2016 FOUR POINT'S 13Y SHERATON 499.25 0.00 499.25 All 00374848 11/16/2016 GALE/CENGAGE LEARNING 16.31 1.57 0.00 16.311.57 All 00374819 11/16/2016 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,693 20 0.00 1.693.20 All 00374850 11/16/2016 GRAINGER 742.92 0.00 742.92 All 00374851 11/16/2016 GRANADOS, KRIS 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00374852 11/16/2016 GRAYBAR 1.128.14 0.00 1.128.14 A1' 003741853 11/16/2016 GRIFFIN STRUCTURES INC 6,089.15 0.00 6.089.15 All 00374854 11/16/2016 HE:ARTSAVE7RS LLC 40.00 0.00 40.00 All 00374855 11/46/2016 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 8.00 0.00 8.00 All 00374856 11/16/2016 1-11 WAY SAFETY INC 5,510.17 0.00 5,510.17 All 00374857 11/16/2016 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 645 1.990.94 0.00 1.990.94 All 00374858 11/16/2016 HOSE MAN INC 148.97 0.00 148.97 All 00371859 11/16/2016 HOUSE OF RU TI1 11165.03 0.00 11165.03 All 00374860 11/16/2016 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY INi 100.00 0.00 100.00 All 00374861 11/16/2016 INDERWIESCHE, MATT 546.00 0.00 546.00 All 00374862 11/16/2016 INDUSTRIAL 17LECTRIC MACHINERY LLC 197100.00 0.00 19,100.00 All 00374863 11/16/2016 INLAND EMPIRE TOURS AND TRANSPORTATION 2,378.50 0.00 2,378.50 All 00374864 11/16/2016 INLAND FAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOARD, 2.760.66 0.00 2,760.66 All 00374865 11/16/2016 INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION 121.06 0.00 121.06 All 0037,1866 11/16/2016 .1 R D GUILLIAM CONSTRUCTION INC 1.370.00 0.00 1.370.00 All 00374867 11/16/2016 JACOBSEN WEST 1,133.85 0.00 1,133.85 All 003748618 11/16/2016 .TAMES. CYNTHIA 1.000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00374869 11/16/2016 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 3,946.80 0.00 3,946.80 All 00374870 11/16/2016 K K WOODWORKING 21.58 0.00 21.58 All 00374871 11/16/2016 KAISER PI?RMANI:N'I'E 664.00 0.00 664.00 All 00374872 11/16/2016 KIM, SEUNGI-IEL7 118.80 0.00 118.80 All 00374873 11/16/2016 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE BY CORTESE 40.00 0.00 40.00 All 00374874 11/16/2016 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 120.00 0.00 120.00 Al' 00374875 11/16/2016 LEAGUE 017 CALIFORNIA CITIES 1,150.00 0.00 1,150.00 All 00374876 11/16/2016 LE -E. DIANNA 146.64 0.00 146.64 All 00374877 11/16/2016 LETNER ROOFING CO INC 143573.50 0.00 143.57350 All 00374878 11/16/2016 LME LLC 11.160.00 0.00 11.160.00 All 0037-1880 11/16/2016 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 7.402.65 1,295.31 8,697.96 *** Al' 00374881 11/16/2016 MARCARELLO. CASEY 38.00 0.00 38.00 All 00374882 11/16/2016 MARCO EQUIPMENT CO 2.108.43 0.00 2,108.43 AP 00374883 11/16/2016 MATLOCK ASSOCIATES 995.00 0.00 995.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Cnrrent Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK -AG ENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P7 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE. PROTECTION DISTRICT AlZenda Check Register 11/8/2016 through 11/28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount All 00374884 11/16/2016 MCDANIEL, MIKE 100.00 0.00 100.00 All 00374885 11/16/2016 MIDWEST-T'APF 551.85 0.00 551.85 All 00374886 11/16/2016 MINUTEMAN PRI -SS 631.85 0.00 631.85 AP 00374887 11/16/2016 MONACOS PI/_/.A R ITALIAN RES'T'AURANT 1.300.24 0.00 1.300.24 AI' 00374888 11/16/2016 MOUNTAIN VIE\\' SMALL ENG REPAIR 368.26 0.00 368.26 All 003711889 11/16/2016 MYSTIC BISCUIT INC 11.160.00 0.00 11,160.00 P 00371890 11/16/2016 NE-I"I'FCI-I COMPUTERS 30.00 0.00 30.00 Al' 00374891 11/16/2016 NEWCOMB ANDERSON MCCORMICK INC 3;407.26 2.271.49 5.678.75 *** All 00374892 11/16/2016 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 1,662.98 603.48 2.266.46 *** All 00374893 11/16/2016 OCLC INC 53.53 0.00 53.53 All 00374894 11/16/2016 01 -1 -ICE DEPOT 6,229.35 13.71 6.243.06 *** All 00374895 11/16/2016 ONTARIO ICE SKATING CENTER 1.948.80 0.00 1,948.80 All 00374896 11/16/2016 ON'T'ARIO WINNELSON CO 423.47 0.00 =423.47 All 00374897 11/16/2016 OPARC 396.00 0.00 396.00 All 00371898 11/16/2016 OSTOS, MARISSA 4.00 0.00 4.00 All 00374899 11/16/2016 O\\SEN ELECTRIC INC 10.62 OAO 10.62 All 00371900 11/16/2016 PALLMER R COMPANY 243.00 0.00 243.00 All 00374901 11/16/2016 PAMINTUAN, MARIANNE 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00374902 11/16/2016 PCN3INC 65.308.04 0.00 65.308.04 All 00374903 11/16/2016 PEPE'S TOWING SERVICE 39.99 0.00 39.99 All 0037,1904 11/16/2016 PEPSI -COLA 182.93 0.00 182.93 All 00374905 11/16/2016 PERSONAL "TRANSPOR"TTERS INC 21423.97 0.00 2.423.97 AP 00374906 11/16/2016 PITASSI ARCHITECTS INC 1.550.00 0.00 1,550.00 All 00374907 11/16/2016 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 1,615.39 0.00 1.615.39 All 00371908 11/16/2016 PRO FORCE T,A\\/ ENFORCEMENT 4,384L61 0.00 4,384.61 All 0037,1909 11/16/2016 PRO SPRAY INC 292.60 0.00 292.60 All 00374910 11/16/2016 PVT' COMMUNICA'T'IONS INC 3,040.22 0.00 3.040.22 All 0037,491 1 11/16/2016 IZANCI-10 CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 8,452.57 0.00 8,452.57 AP 0037,4912 11/16/2016 IZANCI-10 SURGICAL INSTI'T'UTE LLC 30.00 0.00 30.00 All 00374913 11/16/2016 RIPPETOE LAW P C 11.533.97 144.00 11,677.97 *** AP 00374914 11/16/2016 IUM DESIGN GROUP INC 83,009.70 0.00 83.009.70 All 0037,4915 11/16/2016 RODN'IAN,.IFRII B 120.00 0.00 120.00 All 0037,1916 11/16/2016 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 0,00 373.87 373.87 All 0037,1917 11/16/2016 SAFL'• WAY SIGN COMPANY 6.079.16 0.00 6,079.16 All 00371918 11/16/2016 SAN BERNARDINO COUN'T'Y SHERIFFS DEPT 2.620.72 0.00 2.620.72 All 00374919 11/16/2016 SAN BERNARDINO COUNT)' SHERIFFS DEPT 4,321.40 0.00 4.321.40 All 00374920 11/16/2016 SCO"T"T. MICHAEL 129.68 0.00 129.68 All 00374921 11/16/2016 SEISMONOS INC 18,000.00 0.00 181000.00 All 00374922 11/16/2016 SIGMANET 87,397.10 0.00 87,397.10 AP 00374923 11/16/2016 SIGN SHOP, THE 0.00 277.29 277.29 All 00374924 11/16/2016 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 231.61 0.00 231.61 AP 00374925 11/16/2016 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 297.00 0.00 297.00 All 00371930 11/16/2016 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2061799.72 0.00 206,799.72 All 00374931 11/16/2016 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 600.00 0.00 600.00 All 003741932 11/16/2016 STARNET 190.80 0.00 190.80 All 0037,1933 11/16/2016 STI ---NE. ERIK 60.00 0.00 60.00 All 00374934 11/16/2016 SYSCO LOS ANGELES INC 668.16 0.00 668.16 User: VLOPE7_ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK AGENDA -REG PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P8 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register 11 /W2016 through 11/28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount All 00374935 11/16/2016 SYSTEMS SOURCE 8.723.48 0.00 8.723.48 All 00374936 11/16/2016 TAYLOR, JULIE 28.02 0.00 28.02 All 00374937 11/16/2016 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 540.00 540.00 All 00374938 11/16/2016 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 1.091.40 0.00 1.091.40 AP 00374939 11/16/2016 UNITED SITE- SERVICES OF CA INC 233.91 0.00 233.91 AP 00374940 11/16/2016 UNIVERSAL MARTIAL ARTS CENTERS 472.50 0.00 472.50 AP 00374941 11/16/2016 UPS 83.77 0.00 83.77 All 00374942 11/16/2016 US POSTMASTER 11,360.00 0.00 11.360.00 AP 00374943 11/16/2016 UTILIQUEST 1,154.05 0.00 1.154.05 All 00374944 11/16/2016 VALENCIA. PAULA 62.63 0.00 62.63 AP 00374945 11/16/2016 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 2.730.83 2.730.83 AP 00374950 11/16/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,912.59 0.00 5,912.59 All 00374951 11/16/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 4,966.77 0.00 4,966.77 All 00371952 11/16/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.12 0.00 60.12 AP 00374953 11/16/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 221.04 0.00 221.04 All 00374954 11/16/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 89.57 0.00 89.57 AP 00374955 11/16/2016 VICARA 26.83 0.00 26.83 All 00374956 11/16/2016 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER INC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00374957 11/16/2016 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 11,191.12 0.00 11,191.12 AP 00374958 11/16/2016 VIVERAE INC 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 AP 00374959 11/16/2016 VOI-INE LICHE KENNELS INC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00374960 11/16/2016 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 966.18 966.18 All 00374961 11/16/2016 WALKER, TRAVIS 2.61 0.00 2.61 All 00374962 11/16/2016 WAI fERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 999.27 0.00 999.27 All 00374963 11/16/2016 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,424.60 0.00 1,424.60 All 00374964 11/16/2016 WELLS FARGO 13ANK N A 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 All 00374965 11/16/2016 WEST COAST SAND AND GRAVEL INC 1,043.76 0.00 11043.76 All 00374966 11/16/2016 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 463.01 0.00 463.01 All 00374967 11/16/2016 WILLIAMS. DIANE 82.96 0.00 82.96 All 00374968 11/16/2016 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 61.00 61.00 AP 00374969 11/16/2016 WORLD ELITE GYMNASTICS 161.00 0.00 161.00 All 00374972 11/16/2016 XEROX CORPORATION 9,843.76 445.51 10,289.27 *** All 00374973 11/16/2016 YANCY, MICHELLE 73.06 0.00 73.06 AP 00374974 11/16/2016 ZOL'TIS US LLC 2,147.89 0.00 2,147.89 AP 00374975 11/17/2016 ABC LOCKSMITHS 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00374976 11/17/2016 AGILINE LLC 4,240.00 0.00 4,240.00 All 00374977 11/17/2016 AIRGAS USA LLC 818.54 348.54 1,167.08 *** All 00374980 11/17/2016 BRODART BOOKS 3,182.22 0.00 3,182.22 AP 00374981 11/17/2016 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 0.00 151.20 151.20 AP 00374982 11/17/2016 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 110.56 266.26 376.82 *** AP 00374983 11/17/2016 FORD OF UPLAND INC 257.29 0.00 257.29 Al' 00374984 11/17/2016 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 0.00 135.07 135.07 AP 00374985 11/17/2016 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 468.22 468.22 AP 00374986 11/17/2016 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 1,409.75 0.00 1,409.75 AP 00374987 11/17/2016 LIMS AUTO INC 387.13 0.00 387.13 AP 00374988 11/17/2016 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 0.00 507.00 507.00 AP 00374989 11/17/2016 SUNRISE FORD 349.24 0.00 349.24 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG PORTRAIT -CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P9 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Rellister 11/8/2016 through 1 1/28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00374990 11/22/2016 A AND R TIRE SERVICE 1.488.01 0.00 1.488.01 All 00374991 11/22/2016 A'.ION'I'UE. ROSE ANN 1.075.20 0.00 1.075.20 All 00374992 11/22/2016 ACTION AWARDS INC. 1.174.51 0.00 1.174.51 All 00374993 11/22/2016 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 1.376.50 0.00 1,376.50 AP 00374994 11/22/2016 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 79.40 0.00 79.40 All 00374995 11/22/2016 ALBERT GROVER & ASSOCIATES 15,730.00 0.00 15.730.00 All 00374996 11/22/2016 ALCORN. RICHARD 10.00 0.00 10.00 All 00374997 11/22/2016 ALL CITIES ENTERPRISES 56.16 0.00 56.16 AP 00374998 11/22/2016 ALL CITIES TOOLS 302.29 142.45 444.74 *** AP 00374999 11/22/2016 AROCI-10, ALMA 975.00 0.00 975.00 All 00375000 11/22/2016 ARROW BUSINESS CENTER COMMERCIAL 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00375001 11/22/2016 ARROW INTERNATIONAL 0.00 2.387.00 2.387.00 AP 00375002 11/22/2016 ASHLEY. TOYA 23.27 0.00 23.27 All 00375003 11/22/2016 ASSI SECURITY 980.00 0.00 980.00 AP 00375004 11/22/2016 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 103.66 0.00 103.66 AP 00375005 11/22/2016 AVANTS. MARGE 45.00 0.00 45.00 All 00375006 11/22/2016 BASTIAN. DAVID 0.00 261.00 261.00 AP 00375007 11/22/2016 BERN MARIES PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 1.030.44 0.00 1.030.44 All 00375008 11/22/2016 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 184.16 0.00 184.16 All 00375009 11/22/2016 BE'RTINO AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE 488.97 0.00 488.97 All 00375010 11/22/2016 BICONDOVA..IOIIN 0.00 270.00 270.00 All 00375011 11/22/2016 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC. 118.268.66 0.00 118.268.66 All 00375012 11/22/2016 C V W D 115.34 256.32 371.66 *** AP 00375016 11/22/2016 C V V1' D 125,649.35 2,543.58 128,192.93 *** All 00375017 11/22/2016 CABLE INC. 57.680.57 0.00 57.680.57 All 00375018 11/22/2016 CAL PERS 133.681.38 7,443.45 141,124.83 *** AP 00375019 11/22/2016 CAL PERS LONGTERM CARE 294.91 0.00 294.91 All 00375020 11/22/2016 CALIFORNIA 130ARD OF EQUALIZATION. STATE OF 271.52 256.72 528.24 *** AP 00375021 11/22/2016 CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL STATISTICS INC 425.00 0.00 425.00 All 00375022 11/22/2016 CALIFORNIA. STATE OF 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00375023 11/22/2016 CALIFORNIA. STATE OF 233.59 0.00 23359 AP 00375024 11/22/2016 CALIFORNIA. STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00375025 11/22/2016 CALIFORNIA. STATE OF 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00375026 11/22/2016 CAMPOS. RUBEN 3.30 0.00 3.30 AP 00375027 11/22/2016 CAPITOL STEPS PRODUCTIONS INC. 217.00 0.00 217.00 All 00375028 11/22/2016 CARQUEST AU -1-0 PARTS 1.275.01 32.72 1,307.73 *** All 00375029 11/22/2016 CARTY, DIANE 378.00 0.00 378.00 All 00375030 11/22/2016 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 268.44 536.88 805.32 *** All 00375031 11/22/2016 CHENG, XIAOLING 135.92 0.00 135.92 AP 00375032 11/22/2016 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,044.71 110.29 2,155.00 *** All 00375033 11/22/2016 CIRIACKS, VALERIE ANN 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00375034 11/22/2016 CLARK. KAREN 810.00 0.00 810.00 All 00375035 11/22/2016 CLASSE PARTY RENTALS 937.00 0.00 937.00 All 00375036 11/22/2016 COMPRESSED AIR SPECIALTIES 0.00 2,331.35 2,331.35 All 00375037 11/22/2016 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS 9.733.75 0.00 9,733.75 AP 00375038 11/22/2016 D & D GOLF CARS INC. 1.069.20 0.00 1.069.20 All 00375039 11/22/2016 DAVIS FARR LLP 4,400.00 0.00 4.400.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK_AGENDA_ REG_ PORTRAIT_ CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCI-LO CUCAMONGA P10 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Re2istet- 1 1/8/2016 through 1 1/28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Eire Amount All 00375040 11/22/2016 DEPARTMEN'I' OF MOTOR VEHICLES 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00375041 11/22/2016 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 10.364.40 0.00 10.364.40 All 00375042 11/22/2016 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1.987.40 0.00 1,987.40 All 00375043 11/22/2016 DOLLARHIDE. GINGER 132.00 0.00 132.00 All 00375044 11/22/2016 DRAMATIC PUBLISHING 374.99 0.00 374.99 All 00375045 11/22/2016 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, 1-1 IL' 425,00 0.00 425.00 AP 00375046 11/22/2016 DUNN. ANN MARIE 569.40 0.00 569.40 AP 00375047 11/22/2016 E GROUP. THE 450.00 0.00 450.00 All 00375048 11/22/2016 L'ASTERLINIG. RAY 247.80 0.00 247.80 AP 00375049 11/22/2016 ECONOLITE CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 18,588.97 0.00 18,588.97 All 00375050 11/22/2016 EIGHTI I AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 1,142.64 0.00 11142.64 AP 00375051 11/22/2016 ENTERSECT CORP 79.00 0.00 79.00 All 00375052 11/22/2016 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 671.53 0.00 671.53 All 00375053 11/22/2016 FINCHER. VERONICA 2,085.00 0.00 2,085.00 All 00375054 11/22/2016 FOOTHILL PRIMARY CARE 59.94 0.00 59.94 All 00375055 11/22/2016 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 236.20 236.20 All 00375056 11/22/2016 G AND M BUSINESS INTERIORS 3.857.37 0.00 3.857.37 AP 00375057 11/22/2016 GAINES. SANDRA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00375058 11/22/2016 GATEWAY PITT CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 925.00 0.00 925.00 AP 00375059 11/22/2016 GILKEY, JOHN 500.00 0.00 500.00 All 00375060 11/22/2016 GIORDANO. MARIANNA 57.60 0.00 57.60 All 00375061 11/22/2016 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 103,937.00 1,259.00 1051196.00 *** AP 00375062 11/22/2016 GONSALVES AND SON,JOE A 3,045.00 0.00 3,045.00 All 00375063 11/22/2016 GOOD YEAR TIRE AND RUBBER CO. 2,263.52 0.00 27263.52 All 00375064 11/22/2016 GRAINGER 856.81 25.86 882.67 *** AP 00375065 11/22/2016 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00375066 11/22/2016 HAMPTON YOGA 924.00 0.00 924.00 AP 00375067 11/22/2016 HARDY R HARPER INC 39.802.15 0.00 39,802.15 All 00375068 11/22/2016 HARDY & HARPER INC 54,196.82 0.00 54,196.82 All 00375069 11/22/2016 HAY. SHARYN 132.00 0.00 132.00 All 00375070 11/22/2016 HDR ENGINEERING INC 8.719.22 0.00 8,719.22 All 00375071 11/22/2016 HEARTSAVERS LLC 170.00 0.00 170.00 All 00375072 11/22/2016 1.11 WAY SAFETY INC 1.280.23 0.00 1,280.23 All 00375073 11/22/2016 1 -IMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 15,735.00 15,735.00 AP 00375074 11/22/2016 HOLLOWAY. JACK 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00375075 11/22/2016 HORIZONS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INTERNATION 442,21 1.94 0.00 442.211.94 AP 00375076 11/22/2016 HOSEIvIAN INC 0.00 17.22 17.22 AP 00375077 11/22/2016 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 48.59 48.59 All 00375078 11/22/2016 HUFCOR INC. 8,388.00 0.00 8,388.00 All 00375079 11/22/2016 ICC 370.00 0.00 370.00 All 00375080 11/22/2016 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY SUPPLY CORP 102.47 0.00 102.47 All 00375081 11/22/2016 INLAND PAIR HOUSING AND MEDIATION BOARD 1.408.88 0.00 1,408.88 All 00375082 11/22/2016 INLAND PACIFIC BALLET 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 All 00375083 11/22/2016 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 70.46 0.00 70.46 AP 00375084 11/22/2016 INLAND TOP SOIL MIXES 1,157.76 0.00 1.157.76 AP 00375085 11/22/2016 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 1,035.09 0.00 1,035.09 AP 00375086 11/22/2016 JONES, CHRISTINE 50.00 0.00 50.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Datc: 11/29/2016 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLI DATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait I. Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P11 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agenda Check Register II/8/2016through 11/28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name City Dire Amount All 00375087 1 1/22/2016 KENT HARRIS -TRUCKING & MATERIALS 1.123.05 0.00 1,123.05 AP 00375088 11/22/2016 KIMBALL MIDWEST 2.356.52 0.00 2,356.52 AP 00375089 11/22/2016 KRIEGER. ED 300.00 0.00 300.00 All 00375090 11/22/2016 LATREACE, RAINEY 380.00 0.00 380.00 AP 00375091 11/22/2016 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 2,863.01 2,863.01 AP 00375092 11/22/2016 LIRA, ISABEL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00375093 11/22/2016 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 1.625.00 0.00 1,625.00 All 0037509.1 11/22/2016 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 588.00 0.00 588.00 All 00375095 11/22/2016 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 48,954.96 2,052.85 51,007.81 *** All 00375096 11/22/2016 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 175.13 0.00 475.13 All 00375097 11/22/2016 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 All 00375098 11/22/2016 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 168.68 168.68 AP 00375099 11/22/2016 MARSHALL. SYLVIA 1,956.60 0.00 1.956.60 AP 00375100 11/22/2016 MC AVOY & MARKHAM 150.99 0.00 150.99 All 00375101 11/22/2016 MCGEE.130B13Y 34.95 0.00 34.95 All 00375102 11/22/2016 MCMASTER CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 316.30 168.41 484.71 *** All 00375103 11/22/2016 MEDLEY FIRE PROTECTION INC 391.20 0.00 391.20 AP 00375104 11/22/2016 MEINEKE CAR CARE CENTER 2,203.18 0.00 2.203.18 All 00375105 11/22/2016 MENDENHALL.1-117-ATI-IER 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00375106 11/22/2016 MERCURY DISPOSAL SYSTEMS INC 1.702.16 0.00 1.702.16 AP 00375107 11/22/2016 MI.IAC ALARM COMPANY 1=13.00 0.00 143.00 AP 00375108 11/22/2016 MINUTEMAN PRESS 918.88 0.00 918.88 AP 00375109 11/22/2016 NIISAC 550.00 0.00 550.00 AP 00375110 11/22/2016 MISSION REPROGRAPHICS 67.56 0.00 67.56 All 00375111 11/22/2016 MOUNTAIN VIEW CHEVROLET 591.68 0.00 591.68 AP 00375112 11/22/2016 MOUNTAIN VIEW GLASS AND MIRROR INC 616.00 0.00 616.00 All 00375113 11/22/2016 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 275.37 0.00 275.37 AP 00375114 11/22/2016 MUSICSTAR 288.00 0.00 288.00 All 00375115 11/22/2016 NAI'TALYEVA, TAISLYA 5.34 0.00 5.34 All 00375116 11/22/2016 NAPA AUTO PARTS 30.30 0.00 30.30 All 003751 17 11/22/2016 NATIONAL CNG & FLEET SERVICE 760.00 0.00 760.00 AP 00375118 11/22/2016 N13S 2,050.00 0.00 2,050.00 AP 00375119 11/22/2016 NEWMAN. DE13RA 100.00 0.00 100.00 All 00375120 11/22/2016 NE\TEL COMMUNICATIONS 0.00 131.97 131.97 All 00375121 11/22/2016 0 S TS INC 341.00 0.00 341.00 AP 00375122 11/22/2016 OC TANNER RECOGNITION COMPANY 16,318.71 0.00 16,318.71 All 00375124 11/22/2016 OFFICE DEPOT 5,435.23 157.86 5,593.09 *** All 00375125 11/22/2016 ONTRAC 51.84 0.00 51.84 AP 00375126 11/22/2016 ONWARD ENGINEERING 6,256.26 0.00 6,256.26 All 00375127 11/22/2016 ORONA. PATRICIA 1,025.00 0.00 1,025.00 All 00375128 11/22/2016 OTT, LAURA 573.00 0.00 573.00 AP 00375129 11/22/2016 0"17. SHARON 499.50 0.00 499.50 AP 00375130 11/22/2016 PACIFIC PREMIER BANK 0.00 81,292.94 81,292.94 All 00375131 11/22/2016 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 All 00375132 11/22/2016 PENSKE HONDA 42.31 0.00 42.31 AP 00375133 11/22/2016 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 96.59 0.00 96.59 AP 00375134 11/22/2016 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 3,381.09 0.00 3,381.09 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait 1 Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANIONGA P12 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA F.TRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Agencla Check Register 11/8/2016 through 11/28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cite Fire Amount All 00375135 11/22/2016 RANCI-10 CUCAMONGA FONTANA FAMILY YMCA 97603.00 0.00 9.603.00 AP 00375136 11/22/20161 RANCI-10 SMOG CENTER 735.00 0.00 735.00 All 0037-5 137 11/22/2016 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 0.00 1,544.565.85 1.514,565.85 All 00375138 11/22/2010 RDO EQUIPMIENf CO 106.38 0.00 106.38 All 00-375139 11/22/2016 RIGLFMAN. ENCARNACION ONTIVEROS 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00375140 11/22/2016 RIVAS, CHRISTINE 584.56 0.00 584.56 A1) 00375141 11/22/2016 RIVERSIDE PRECISION SCALE INC 0.00 88.62 88.62 All 00375142 11/22/2016 ROBERT, WILMA 5.19 0.00 5.19 All 00375143 11/22/2016 ROBLES. PRANK 60.50 0.00 60.50 All 00375144 11/22/2016 RODRIGUEZ INC. RY 487.90 0.00 487.90 All 00375145 11/22/2016 S.CALIF. MUNICIPAL ATHLETIC FEDERATION 5-1.00 0.00 54.00 All 00375146 11/22/2016 SAMS CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 182.76 0.00 182.76 All 00375/47 11/22/2016 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 334.56 0.00 334.56 All 00375148 11/22/2016 SBPEA 959.04 OAO 959.01 All 00375149 11/22/2016 SCI-IUIT, CAROL, 98.56 0.00 98.56 All 00375150 11/22/2016 SENECHAL, CALVIN 462.60 0.00 =462.60 AP 00375151 11/22/2016 SEXTON. SHEILA 3.00 0.00 3.00 All 00375152 11/22/2016 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 446.95 0.00 446.95 All 00375153 11/22/2016 SHRED IT USA LLC 112.05 0.00 112.05 All 00375154 11/22/2016 SI-IRED PROS 65.00 0.00 65.00 All 00375155 11/22/2016 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 41,841.81 0.00 41.841.81 All 00375156 11/22/2016 SIGMANET 9.249.00 0.00 9,249.00 All 00375157 11/22/2016 SITEONL-' LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 1,559.72 0.00 1.559.72 All 00375158 11/22/2016 SMARTLITE 395.00 0.00 395.00 AP 00375159 11/22/2016 SMITH. RAMONA 101.68 0.00 101.68 AP 00375160 11/22/2016 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 18.57 294.45 313.02 *** All 00375161 11/22/2016 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 11204.95 0.00 1,204.95 All 00375162 11/22/2016 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 908.44 0.00 908.44 All 00375164 11/22/2016 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 41.561.77 0.00 4,561.77 All 00375165 11/22/2016 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 11425.20 0.00 1.425.20 AP 00375166 11/22/2016 SOUTI-ILAND FARMERS MARKET ASSOC INC 182.00 0.00 182.00 All 00375167 11/22/2016 SOUTHLAND SPORTS OFFICIALS 1,980.00 0.00 1,980.00 All 00375168 11/22/2016 STAPLETON..IOSIIUA 0.00 261.00 261.00 All 00375169 11/22/2016 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 668.22 0.00 668.22 All 00375170 11/22/2016 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 57.98 57.98 AP 00375171 11/22/2016 SWARTZ, ALAN 216.00 0.00 216.00 All 00375172 11/22/2016 THEATRE a, BOSTON COURT. THE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00375173 11/22/2016 TRACEY, VAL 84.00 0.00 84.00 All 00375174 11/22/2016 TRAILS rr ETIWANDA 100.00 0.00 100.00 All 00375175 11/22/2016 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 166.40 0.00 166.40 AP 00375176 11/22/2016 TYUS. IDA 135.00 0.00 135.00 All 00375177 11/22/2016 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 653.19 0.00 653.19 All 00375178 11/22/2016 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 518.610 0.00 518.60 All 00375179 11/22/2016 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 9.863.31 0.00 9.863.31 All 00375180 11/22/2016 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 25.646.00 0.00 25,646.00 All 00375181 11/22/2016 UNITED WAY 136.00 0.00 136.00 All 00375182 11/22/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 820.86 0.00 820.86 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLI DATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCA TONGA P13 AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Atienda Check Register 1 1/8/2016 through 1 1/28/2016 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cite Fire An►ount All 00375183 11/22/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 611.16 0.00 611.16 All 00375184 11/22/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 66.25 0.00 66.25 AP 00375185 11/22/2016 VICTORIA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 150.00 0.00 150.00 A1' 00375186 11/22/2016 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 1.926.46 0.00 1.926.46 All 00375187 11/22/2016 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 0.00 957.50 957.50 All 00375188 11/22/2016 WADI: &, LOWE APC 99.07 0.00 99.07 All 00375189 11/22/2016 WAL"PERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 2.504.90 0.00 2.504.90 AI' 00375190 11/22/2016 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3.544.90 404.91 3.949.81 *** All 00375191 11/22/2016 WESSELL, GUY 100.00 0.00 100.00 All 00375192 11/22/2016 WESTCOAST MEDIA 500.00 0.00 500.00 All 00375193 11/22/2016 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 700.00 0.00 700.00 A1' 00375194 11/22/2016 WHI"I"ITER FERTILIZER 17560.60 0.00 1.560.60 AP 00375195 11/22/2016 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 972.45 0.00 972.45 All 00375196 11/22/2016 WILSON. PRINCESS 30.78 0.00 30.78 All 00375197 11/22/2016 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 1,600.00 0.00 1,600.00 All 00375198 11/22/2016 7_EP MANUFACTURING COMPANY 0.00 964.56 964.56 All 00375199 11/23/2016 CURA"I-AlO..IAN4ES 0.00 1,608.97 1.608.97 All 00375200 11/23/2016 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 962.66 962.66 All 00375201 11/23/2016 TOWNSEND..IAMES 0.00 12608.97 1.608.97 AP 00375202 11/23/2016 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 283.04 283.04 AP 00375203 11/23/2016 R C EMPLOYI?E ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE 171150.00 0.00 17.150.00 All 00375204 11/23/2016 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 669.97 0.00 669.97 All 00375205 11/23/2016 AIRGAS USA LLC 1,170.70 0.00 1.170.70 All 00375206 11/23/2016 DAISY 660.88 0.00 660.88 AP 00375207 11/23/2016 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 426.89 0.00 426.89 All 00375208 11/23/2016 EMCOR SERVICE 6,829.20 0.00 6,829.20 AP 00375209 11/23/2016 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 191.46 0.00 191.46 AP 00375210 11/23/2016 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 378.32 0.00 378.32 AP 00375211 11/23/2016 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,123.45 0.00 3.123.45 All 00375212 11/23/2016 KME 171 RE APPARATUS 0.00 327.98 327.98 All 00375213 11/23/2016 LANDCARE USA H -C 38.803.90 0.00 38.803.90 All 00375214 11/23/2016 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 161.16 0.00 161.16 All 00375215 11/23/2016 SPINITAR 445.00 0.00 445.00 Total City: $4,029,684.14 Total Fire: 51,874,762.58 Grand Total: $5,904,446.72 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 11/29/2016 Report: CK -AGENDA -REG PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait L Time: 16:13:15 STAFF REPORT PCANCIH O CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Rob Ball, Fire Marshal 0 Subject: Consideration of a Resolution of the City Council ratifying the Fire District's adoption of the 2016 California Fire Code with certain amendments and providing for the issuance of permits and collection of fees. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approves Resolution No. 16-190 that ratifies the Fire District's Ordinance No. FD 56, which adopted the 2016 California Fire Code with certain amendments and which provide for the issuance of permits and the collection of fees. It is further recommended that the City Council delegates the authority to enforce the Fire Code to the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. BACKGROUND and ANALYSIS This action formalizes the authority of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to enforce the provisions of the recently adopted 2016 California Fire Code (Fire District Ordinance No. FD 56) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This action is required for the following reasons: 1. The City and Fire District are separate legal entities. 2. The City lies within the boundaries of the Fire District. 3. The Fire District provides fire services to the City. 4. The California Health and Safety Code Section 13869.7 requires the Fire District to transmit all of its adopted ordinances to the City for an official legislative action. The City Council has the option to ratify, modify, or deny a District adopted ordinance. If the Council chooses to ratify the Fire District's Ordinance, the Council is required by subdivision (h) of Health and Safety Code Section 13869.7 to delegate the enforcement of the District's Ordinance to either the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District or the Chief Building Official of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. This resolution delegates enforcement authority for the Fire Code to the Fire Chief of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. P15 RESOLUTION NO. 16-190 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RATIFYING ORDINANCE NO. FD 56 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, THE DISTRICT'S ADOPTION BY REFERENCE OF THE 2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, WITH ERRATA, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN CHANGES, MODIFICATIONS, AMENDMENTS, ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, AND EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTION OF FEES; AND REPEALING CONFLICTING ORDINANCES. A. Recitals. (i) The Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Fire District) has approved Ordinance No. FD 56 adopting by reference the 2016 Edition of the California Fire Code, with errata, together with certain changes, modifications, amendments, additions, deletions, and exceptions as required by Health & Safety Code Section 17958. (ii) Health & Safety Code Section 13869.7 requires the City Council to ratify, modify, or deny Fire District ordinances that will apply within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that contain building standards relating to fire and panic safety that are more stringent than the building standards adopted by the State Fire Marshal. (iii) Health & Safety Code Section 13869.7(h) further requires the City Council, upon ratification of such an ordinance, to delegate the enforcement of the ordinance to either the Chief of the Fire Protection District or the Chief Building Official of the City. (iv) All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds and resolves as follows: 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Fire District Ordinance No. FD 56 is ratified. 3. The enforcement of Fire District Ordinance No. FD 56 is delegated to the Chief of the Fire District. 4. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. STAFF REPORT oR PUBLIC V ORI -,ti S �R\ I CES DEP :�RTNIEN'1 II RANCHO Date: December 7, 2016 CUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR - FY 2015/2016 PROJECT', CONTRACT NO. 15-208 AS COMPLETE; RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND; ACCEPT A MAINTENANCE BOND; AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF THE LABOR AND MATERIALS BOND; APPROVE A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS SERVICES DIRECTOR TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AUTHORIZE THE RELEASE OF THE RETENTION 35 DAYS AFTER ACCEPTANCE; AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $856,792.60 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the Citywide Concrete Repair - FY 2015/2016 Project Contract No. 15-208, as complete release the Faithful Performance Bond; accept a Maintenance Bond authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $731 798 00 six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received: authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $42,839.63 35 days after acceptance; and approve the final contract amount of $856,792.60 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director The "Citywide Concrete Repa r - FY 2015 1016 Project s ope of work consisted of repairing concrete sidewalks, curb/gutters and drive approaches with mayor deflections in the public right-of-way and City maintained landscapes including City parks and paseos. Tree removals and replanting where appropriate were included in the scope of work Neighborhoods included in this project were adjacent to Terra Vista Elementary Schoo Vineyard Junior H gh School segments of Carnelian Street and various parks and paseos located in Landscape Ma ntenance Districts 2 and 4R Pertinent information of the project is as fol ows Budgeted Amount: ➢ Account Numbers: City Council Approval to Advertise Publish dates for local paper: $890,000 100 318-5300 1177303-5300 1131303-5300 1134303-5300 August 19, 2015 August 25, 2015 September 1, 2015 C aVA CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR - FY 2015/1016 PROJECT NOTICE OF COMPLETION DECEMBER 7, 2016 PAGE 2 ➢ Bid Opening: ➢ Contract Award Date: ➢ Low Bidder: ➢ Contract Amount: ➢ 10% Contingency: ➢ Final Contract Amount: ➢ Difference in Contract Amount September 15, 2015 October 21, 2015 D.M. Contracting of Colton $731,798.00 $158,202.00 $856,792.60 $124,994.60 (17%) The net increase in the total cost of the project is a result of six (6) contract change orders, including the balancing statement. The notable changes that were significant to the increase of the contract amount were: additional sidewalk replacements in the Cucamonga Middle School area and the south side of Base Line Road between Ramona Avenue and Center Avenue. The balancing statement also accounted for other minor increases and decreases in the project quantities. RESOLUTION NO. 16-191 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE "CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR - FY 2015/2016 PROJECT", CONTRACT NO. 15-208 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the "Citywide Concrete Repair - FY 2015/2016 Project", Contract No. 15-208, has been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the CITY COUNCIL of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the Public Works Services Director is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. P19 STAFF REPORT PUBIC WORKS SHRVICH.S INTARTNIENT i Date: December 7, 2016 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council C,UCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED, AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $383,247.25 FOR THE "CIVIC CENTER — LANDSCAPE RENOVATION PHASE 1 PROJECT" TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, PRINCIPLES CONTRACTING, INC. OF RIVERSIDE, AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $38,324.73 TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT 1025001-5607 (CAPITAL RESERVE) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received, award and authorize the execution of a contract for the amount of $383,247.25 for the "Civic Center — Landscape Renovation Phase 1 Project" to the lowest responsive bidder, Principles Contracting, Inc. of Riverside, and authorize the expenditure of a contingency in the amount of $38,324.73 to be funded from Account 1025001-5607 (Capital Reserve). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS As part of the City's on-going efforts to reduce water consumption, the Public Works Services Department initiated a project to remove the existing high water use landscaping (primarily turf) along the Haven Avenue frontage and Civic Center Drive frontage of the Civic Center. These areas will then be re - landscaped with drought tolerant landscaping and a new irrigation system will be installed. The City Council originally authorized the advertising of the Notice Inviting Bids on February 3, 2016. However, when bids were opened on March 6, 2016, the lowest responsive bid exceeded the project budget. On May 4, 2016, the City Council rejected all bids as non-responsive to the needs of the City. The project funds were carried into the 2016/2017 fiscal year and the budget was increased and the project was re -bid. Prior to re -bidding the project, staff and the project consultant, Architerra Design Group, revised the scope of the project but kept the same landscape palette. The City Council approved the revised plans and specifications and authorized the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids" for the "Civic Center— Landscape Renovation Phase 1 Project" during its October 3, 2016 meeting. The Base Bid includes the removal of the existing landscaping and irrigation system followed by the installation of new drought tolerant landscape vegetation, boulders, decomposed granite, and water efficient irrigation systems. A majority of existing trees and improvements will be protected in place. The bid documents include seven Additive Bids to plant vines, install cable and vine systems, restore the corner monuments, and install a green screen fence. The contract award amount of $383,247.25 includes the Base Bid ($325,514) and all seven of the Additive Bids ($57,733.25). "CIVIC CENTER — LANDSCAPE RENOVATION PHASE 1 PROJECT" DECEMBER 7, 2016 PAGE 2 This landscape renovation project will have minimum impact on staff and the public. While the existing landscaping and irrigation system are being removed and replaced, the sidewalks along Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive will remain open for use. Eight (8) bids for this project were opened at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 15, 2016 (see attached Bid Summary). Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds that the lowest responsive bidder, Principles Contracting, Inc. of Riverside, has met the requirements of the bid documents. The project is scheduled to be completed within forty (40) working days. Attachment p y V1 n a0 O T Cl N Ol N m N ao N O Ol N VI l0 N l0 N R t0 1p l0 ao V1 l0 T .-� n .-I n N O H N n O n O n QI n Ol O O n N n N v m m l0 N V T T O O q O m m N C Ol 00 rl rl rl N H N N O O l0 1p Vl Vl O O C C N N H .-� N N VI VI O l0 N Vf Vl O O OO N d l0 l0 Ol lD O T r1 tIl a? aA N N lD VI 00 1D N aA eA H all alf to N H N N N alf m N M N t1i O m O m W 00 N N Ol O N N tD O C C Vl VI R O O m m d u m N m VI V Cl n m T n m Cl .-1 7 n l0 O1 Ql N n N T H O C1 N Cl n k m R N V1 T C T OO W N n Cl . O VI N 00 ' 40 l0 H N O n m a Ol T T V1 V1 Vl 111 C O d Cl h 6 O V1 m V1 111 n Vl n T m m VI .-1 m N m 10 n 0 O O 00 V1 O N O O w O VI O O V1 O O O ml -,r V 00 Ol O 00 Ol V1 Vl O ul Ol .-I .i 00 OO C O O 10 00 VI VI N W l0 VI n T Vl n W R a V R C m Vl 00 10 10 a7 n n V1 T N N l0 l0 n l0 m m N .4 Ol . O N N l0 aY Ol m o ? W m T V m O m n T 10 O lD m R O O m m d u m N m VI V Cl n m T n m Cl .-1 7 n l0 O1 Ql N n N T H O C1 N Cl n k m R N V1 T C T OO W N n Cl . O VI N 00 ' 40 l0 H N O n m a Ol T T V1 V1 Vl 111 C O d Cl h 6 O V1 m V1 111 n Vl n T m m VI .-1 m N m 10 n V to N .4-1 N ti a/1 N aA N aA W W t/l a/l a/l a/f N N N a/l a/f H N N to N a/l N N a/l aA tM1 aA N H a C O O n VI Vf 00 00 O 00 ul VI O O 111 N O O l0 W n n n n n n Vl VI o N cn rl N V C O O m m OR O O 00 m t a N N N O UD l0 Ul Cl V1 111 m m 111 Vl N N n V 1 m N N OO OO INiI N V1 Ol N N N N CO O O O m m VI rl H N N N N N N N N l0 !11 C O O l0 lD O 4 a y, n pl 10 N Vl N lA N w T m N O VT aA H h N N N N N Vf N N N 1M1 alf aA N N aA aA N N N N O n T V Ol [f m m 111 V) N N 111 V1 0 L a A c o N "S 0 0 C a — V 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 V1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 V1 000 V1 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O o O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 N O O N vl N In O a0 m m O O vi N r` o o o o ui m o m o n a ry 10 m to v co a Ic m v o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O N N n T n a0 N l0 N N m n N N ao In V a0 ao Ol In 10 .+ m N o t0 m O O 00 of Ci o Vl 00 a0 0 Ol Ol 0 0 V C d 111 W r1 N n O R C C 1D W T V N T N m N N m m V1 V H N N .-I N h rl ri p u N all H all N N aA N to N aA a-1 N N NNN N N N N VT h N aA N N aA aA N aA N N all aA H N alf a/1 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V1 ul 0 0 0 0 vt V1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W N N N N 0 0 0 0 W W Vl VI O O N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O d` O O O O .-� N N aA an alY O 10 O N V! N N Nan an an N �-1 N .-I N an aA N N aA to O m O m O O O Vl 0 O0 0 0 m m 0 0 n n co D N N O Oco O O O o C N O O lD Vl V1 N tO lJ W W Ot n V) V O K l7 tT T V1 � C � G 7n N Vt Vl N VI O OO O O .-1 Vl O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O Vl O O Vl O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 Ln0 7 W 0 0 0 V1 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O R m O n O 0 0 O O O O O o o N 111 111 o .-I u; O R 0 o V1 .-I o o m O C; C; tri m 0 V1 10 m w lC 0 0 o V; m 0 0 0 0 u N u .` N Vt N Vl V 10 N N n N 0 lD VI VI l0 r N t0 N T N l0 m n O O N' O VI -c!VI V O 10 N n N m n 00 O m 0l 0 N C 10 n O VI 10 m O O O C N Ol n m 0 0 VI Vl 0 0 c ctj d V C N m R lD m v N N H N N T 00 Cl n Vl m N mVf n V) N N aA aA V1 N N rl ,,,1 C N N VF to N aA aA aA N N N to aA aA N rl N all aA N N N N t7 O 0 O 0 O 0 00 -- Ol m Cl m 0 o 0 o 0 .. 0 rl 0 0 0 0 00 0 OO 0 O O O o O o O In O In Vl m V1 m VI n m n O O O o O 0 O 0 00000 0 0 0 0 0 '— 111 ul O • •1 '4 0 0 0 0 0 0 IV N r` O •-I .i r` n N N N N N N O O O Vl V1 O 000 d � � N N aA aIf aA � � Vl aA Vf Vf H VF aA N N N N aIT aA VT N V� � � O N n O O O O O .0 R R aA aA ah aA a�/1 N N N to aA aA m m N N O O O V1 0 0 0 0 0 0 111 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n ul O O O O ul n O O R 0 V1 Vl 0 0 O O O O O Vl O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 C y O O w O n m Vl O O N O O O 10 O O VOO 10 W N n m IL1 vi O O O vl O O O O O y ` O VI O V1 n V1 l0 O T l0 l0 N l0 m O lD rl N lD 1D M 00 n m n N N et O n N N N W Vl 111 N V1 T N VI N O N n n m N N O Vl n Vl N C 10 VI Ol n m N IV 00 m 0 0 n n d N d Ol aIf Ol N � 10 N l0 N V1 N n� aA aM1 V1 aM1 H� N N T a/1 T O N tM1 A alf N � N m N N N N O an tLl all � aA T N h ri tIl N N N a/l aA to N N 1A a C J N 000 O O O O O V1 n ul n O O O 0 O 0 O 0 V1 0 V1 0 O 0 O 0 O N O O 0 Vl O V1 O O O O O Vl O ul O O O O O m O 111 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 N O O Ol O O H .4 , O o C; w lL1 .-I u; O O .-1 a .-I .-1 N .-I 0 0 0 O 0 O V1 O O O O O 0 0 C d 00 111 111 N aA aA aA h 00 V1 m n N N N N N tR h N V N V N N 4A aA V/ Vl Vf N N l0 VI m n T N N 00 00 m m N .0 Ol T W H ti aA all H all N to aA aA 0 N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ul u1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m VI O O oO O O O o O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 '•I O R N O O O m ul ul Vl O Ol V O O V 00 a w 00 O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 C U O O O O N m 00 0 VI 00 w VI 00 1D O N O m Vl l0 R N n Ql N n m n l0 n VI N N co W T W T m Ol N l0 '-I N Vl - t0 m O O N O O O 00 O N O O O O VI V1 O O N N y` d O O N 00 W N 11 111 111 N 111 �-/ N .•i N O n N .•1 W 1 11 O rl N H .-I C .-I N N N VF aM1 aA aM1 N N N aA N N Nan to N N V? N N H aA .-I all N N N tIF aA N N N a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 W v 0 0 0 0 0 V1 VI O O N IV 0 0 0 0 vl V1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O J O O V1 __ 0 0 0 0 0 0 VI Vl V1 C O O O O N N N N N N O 0 0 O 00000 d a, O O O O aA aA N tR to O O N N N N N Vl aA VT N N H N N N an an N aA O 0 0 O N O O O O O O C O O N N Vel y N h N N N N O 00 N 00 G r. r. N O N N G C G O Ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 0 0 V1 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 N 0 O 1 m u r: O O O O 111 N n T 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 O m 0 m? 0 0 N O IV O O n O 00 O R O n O o O 00 O O O O 000 O O O O O O ✓ N V O O O O N 00 Vl ul ? O 111 .-I Vl VI Vl n 0 V) R O Ol R T O n -0 O O Vl Vl O O L. NH VHI Va/! VWl NW Nn .'--II NID N111 aTA aVA amll aVh1 m aA O o to NV U NNm 00 NmV1 N11 �ao arNt /t1 l0 an NmN N NON VnNf N �a0 �W 1 Nn -Hl ri J d N 00 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 VI 0 V1 0 O 0 O V1 N V1 N O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 •-I .-I .-1 .-I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 r1 00 co H O O O O 00 0 00 du O O O O T N Vl aA aA aA VI n Vl n aA alf N .-1 Vl N N rl N N H all aA M N N N H W Vl T Vl m O VI O m 00 W V1 Vl n n Vl m n n 'C N Vl aA h aA N .-I aA Vf N aA M} N N w 00 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 00 O O O O O O C O O O O O 00 N l0 O O n O VI OlNy O O O VI O O O O n n 0 0 O 7 O m O C O to O a0 O V O O O 00 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N l0 n n Vl VI O N O O O N n m l0 m 00 V1 m '-I m n r l0 00 Vl m m O m Cl 00 Cl w t0 .-I ct 111 Vl Q l0 m O O 111 0 m 0 N O N 0 m 0 0 V) 111 0 0 O O ` d W N W� H ti N •-I N ti aA N�� aA aA aA m� aA aA ri N N V1 N H T N N aA N M' 00 aA VI aA N N rl N a0 aA M N VI aA � all H N N aA N all N aA N D N H H N N C tin O u O O O O O O O OVl OlD O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O OV1 OVl wuo 00NNm T O O m m T O O O O OCR OO OO 9 OOVI O OO111 O NOOOO O O O O OOOOOEd !, _ O V OO V N O N OOOOO 0 . Ip 00 N N h ,.y �y N aA all aA V1 aA al Zl N C O V1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vl VI n O 0 O 0 O 0 O N 0 n Vl N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O O O O 00000 O O O O O .-I O 00 N O w O o 0 N m V1 V1 n 0 Cl N w 00 l0 N .i N .I O O O O O O O O O m C .p .` O W O O C R l0 ti O m m m m � 0 V 0 l0 .-I T Vl O n Ol N n m m O — .I r vl V t0 OO n aY O V1 N ICI T m n 7 Vl O O Ol O Vl O 00 O O 0 Vl 0 0 0 0 'O V w VI m V �"� N N N N N 00 ?O a0 l0N N N 3 H N H N H N .-I N an aA aI} aA aIf aA N to .-I aA aA aA N rl Vf N try H to N to N 71W C 0 0 c N o n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 In n 0 0 0 0 m m o o O o O o O O O 0 0 0 00000 N N u O R O O O O O O O N N O 0 0 0 N N O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 N O. '— d O n N N N N 0 0 O--- 0 0 ul ul a/1to N rl O allmC O rV N m m T T m m O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 d MCI d` N N LL J Vf Vl Vl Vl W W LL 111 LL V1 LL J J VI LL Vl Vf VI LL W W W W W W W W W � N VI VI VI V) N VI VI N N O N O Ol 111 00 n O Vf V1 m n O Ol m 00 C1 N 7 n m C n m V1 N r1 N N N N N l0 0 O V1 o0 10 .-1 l0 m V1 N H N m m C V1 C m R V1 l0 V1 It l0 m O m n Cl C T W O N n n N W N O w co V1 n .m -I .W-1 O0 m e 1 N 1D N N N N N N N N y N N N N N .- O CO 00 00 N N O p N N N N N N 01 C C n1 n) N N 0 E E E E E E > > N > m .N - N :: «'. .N. .N. m m — N m° m° > 10 :U d 00 OD VTI Vel VAI VTI N Vl C C C N W N O O > C C >N >C >oEE m > E dN dN O NN O ,„N1 O rvN O ✓ O N10 > N >> °" E O E O E E OoNC > l7 UA' N N N N N > >O y, N A C m > C W C C aj su ? 1N> NN o E y y N NN 0. > E E°°E E°°> E uY°udw A> sE NN NN 33a 1p d j O OOO >NN' o N NN N m Y - - . == v u u m m°l Lo b b Qd Q@Q @j Cl \'2 l7 0 m mO o O r1 n m m m v In In Ip In n n a0 0l r•1 O N N .a H ry �••1 N N m N m e4 v '-1 c N In rl vl N o N H m H m m H o o 0 N N N P21 OO V n n IIl tll nM 0 M M H M M N N M M N N ID ID M V M M H M M N N M N M 00 O m V N N N IO ID N N ID lD ID N N H W H H Ill Ill wID Ill to Ill N wO 't R m V w O ID m V" N n 't Oq Ol m H H m M m M O Vl O VI 00 m 00 Ill '7 O } V} '7 Vl N H N H O O O '7 of 00 e{ DO O O H N O O w h n n H H H H R H T Vf m �A o m N N w m N O H O Ol m O- H H n N m m m Ol VJ R 00 V 00 R m IA Vl N m N N Vl N VT N �A N aA V} H ID m m +n h 7n +n N VT N to OI m Oq H VT 7n V? M N V OI H H H M1 N' H N H N H H Vl N V/ Vl N N N 1A N N 1A M V M M n n ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 n n 0 0 N O lD N O O lD a Ol m to O a0 a0 N O U N a0 O O n to m N H H H H IA O O R ID O O m ul ID m Oq ID Ill n N In n ID N m OI n 0 lD K H O m N C ID O Ul .-1 m Ill N n H n H m n m n mw r m w m a W 0 m H H ID m m H m H .-1 n b n m T V O m H 00 m Ill n lD m m W b n N O n w m m C v O C n m m v n wO H n m Vl 0 O n m O H ID m m ID T N lD H N H Vl to OI m Oq H T m T m N V OI H H V V R V a O V H ID V H H O H H m n Q N lD 00 ID n ID 00 H N H C m r V llf N w O m m C Oq H T m ID m H T N H ID lD H H H VT H---- Vf N H N H W N H— N — — N----- H N H to H V/ N N N N N H N H N n n 01 01 n n mm M 0 0 Ol T In m H H lD ID In ul N N n n In In N N n n 00 00 ID O O n n n n H H H H m V N N Vl Vl H H ID ID m m Ol al OD Oq ID ID R : H H 01 01 O O N N H Oq Oq Ill 1/1 Oq H 00 H n H n H m n m n Vl n n 1A n N M H M H m N y H n H n O to mom V/ Vf Q V? H V H V R C M H M' T VT n Vl r tll C lD C lD N N Ill Ill N H N H ID N ID N T ID n ej n of N M N T to m H N M T — — — — H to VT to Vl Vl N O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O I/1 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O o O O O O Ill O Ill O N O I/l 0 O 0 o 0 O 0 ID 0 R 0 00 0 00 O Ip O ID C V N O ID N N W M N V) M O V O N n M co 00 0 ID 0 O 0 M 0 m 0 0 O O 0 ID 0 O' 0 0 N 0 00 O o O Ill O vl O o IA t'1f O 1p N H N N N m 00 y R V1 M H V H ID H lD m M h T N lLi T O1 lD T w M N l0 N N� ID M M Oq n . n N H— OI n N n T N n n a0 O H M Ill N m OI n O H C M 00 ID Vl N H N aA N H Vf N N Vl �A V1 �A V} VF �A VT H N H N V} V} V' VT VT VT VT VT H VT H Vl Vl V� N N Vf H to N �A O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O In m O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o O n n 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O ✓t mom vl N to O O m H m H n N n N 0 V 0 7 O N O N H V} H O O m vT N m N 0 N vl } H to V of O Oq O DD O H O H o 0 O O o H 0 H o M 0 MM Ill O IA O ttt O N O VJ IA ut N N V 7 H V� 1A H H VF M1 Vf V} H H N N m m N VT N 1A H V1 N 1A Vf o a o 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H ni o ry N w ID n ri o m ai H w o rri ID W �t ri al n .t o to ]� 'S -i �7 M H :n N 111 n O OI •' rj 'S OI tD ID M rl H 01 H vt• H In H v1 .y In 11f vl K .� rn il1 Ilf 0 0 o D o o 0o o o o 0 0 0 o o 0 o o o o o 0 o o o 0 o 0 o 0 o o 0 o o ID a o o 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 co o 0 0 0 o 0o v o o 0 o v o a Io 0 0 0 0 0 0 10, vi H w Io m ID V O O O O O O O O O O O O O O lD O O O N O M m M O lD O lD m 00 ttl 00 ID H N O N O N W m O lD a N ry V1 -IrH V] n C N W N n .-1 n VJ O O ttl R H m m n H lD O N lD n a N Ol l0 V n O Ol O H N VJ M N N N N H H 00 M p m H ID 00 v n M N H n N N N N '^ m n V H M Vl VJ V v H N m R '^ M H n Vl N Lr M N N N 00 S N H N Ol m m n O Ol v O v Ol m lD N M T N H 131 H M H �A to H V} V1 Vf Vf Vf Vf VT �A H VT N M1 H Vl N N N h N N N H tl1 H to N VT V N M N N N O O O O OO O O O In In O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m In In T T N N O O O O O O O O O C V N N O O O O N N N N IA to N N Oq 00 O O O O O O n n m m m n n V V O O o O O O O mom o 0 Vl oto M M to n H n H 0 M 0 M Vl M m MN H H N .-I Vl H ul v H m H M R M N H N N N N V N m n ID n lD vl vl m m M V OI of M T M T 0 00 N M N M n M n M M N M V1 N h N N1 H N H VT H N N N N N N N N aA N Vf Vl Vf N Vl H H VT VT Vl �A �A Vf �A VT Vl O O O O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O moo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O R n n 0 0 0 00 N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O O O In m IA M ID v lO c 10 H O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 00 00 00 m O ID O ID C N ID n N a m O 0 0 O 0 ID m m O N C O ID Ill r vl n O N O N O Ill W O n O N m O 00 N M O b O W N Ol Ill m N N a N Oq O V} VI 1A V? r H 00 m ID 0 n ID ID Ill N N H m m H m Vl O W H m VI R N 00 M m N H N V Ol M Ol Ol V] H 00 H Ill N C N Yr1 C Ill O, VI C V O O n N m IU n H n H N H N Vl V1 VF VF N 1A N N N 1A N N V1 N VF N N N N Vf Vf Vf H V/ H 1A 1A H N H N H N Vf V1 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O Ill Ill m Ill 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o O O O O O O O O O O I/I O O O O O O W 00 lD lD O O V R O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m mO O O O O O O O O O O u1 M u M w V w V m N m N m N V1 N o?? m H H o N O N o IA o �A o tl1 O m Vf N Ill N n Ml n Ill Vl VT m M1 m T m T O O O C VI m 'cf et m Vf m VT 00 T m T Vi Ol ttl m m m vl T Vi T 7 N Q N N V1 Vl N V1 N �A to to H �A H VT V} N H N H V1 H N H N H H N N V1 V1 V1 Vl V1 N N O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O In ul 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 O o O o ul D ul o O o O o V o O o O o ID o V o ID o ID o O o O w m w N n H o o m ID o N w V v w ID m v a vi n vi N vi n 0 vl 0 0 O Ill 0 VJ 0 O 0 Ill 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 VI o m ui n m V v 70 m M R ID N ID m 00 m T m ID N T m T n ID N ID ID -Tn H V N Ol M H n M Ul N N V VJ Q M n T m h ID N N H T O N 1p n O H m Vl m N lD lD w H C T m 1p Ill H o0 H to N N V1 H V1 NNN V' V? t? Vl VT V} tl' VT to �A N VT V} V} H Vf H Vf N N N N H V1 N O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O u m o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O n n N V1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O I/I O N O O O O O N lD N ID N N H N H o 00 o 00 O O 0 O 0 M 0 t? 0 h 0 0 N H 0 H 0 Vf 00 N VT V' N VI Ill N to N In n an n O O m m O H O H N N Ill N O O O I+I O N O m N N 1A 1A N V1 N N Vf VT Vf Vf N Vl N N N 0 0 a o n n o o o 0 0 o o o o o o o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 o o o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N l0 m 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O Ill O OO O O O O O O O O ID O O O O O O o o o V o O o to O I m n O to O m OO Ill H O w O Q n V ID H 0 m 0 u 0 H 0 ID 0 0 m m W v O vv O O o O ID O VJ o V O N O o N m O O ul N m h VI N m N Ol m N H ID - Oq - N N O H m N V +n V �* 00 H OO N C H H m H N O m V N M ul co I/I ID I11 R N M M N N H VJ O H N OC w N N OI N IO LD M h m m n ID O H n +n Vf V1 a/1 H H M' M' V' V1 V} Vl V1 VT H V1 N N N N N N N H Vf Vf to Vl to O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o o 0 o 0 0 0 O O O O O o o O O O o o o o o o o 0 o T M M M o 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 o VI O Vl O O O O O O O O O M n V1 n V! O H O H Ill N m N O Vl O Ill O N O N In N 0 n N H n H m R Vl M H to m Vf 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 n 0 0 n n 00 V} 00 VT IA N N N O N O N O N O N O N n to n Vf Ill N VI VT Vl VF Vl V} N N N N N H N H N �A N �A Vf VT V} V} V} V} VF Vf Vf H N N N N N o o o oo o o o o o o o o o o o o In o o o o o o 0 o 0 o o 0 o 0 0 o o o o 0 o o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 O o 0 0 O O o O O - oo , O o O w N 0 O 0 O 0 w 0 N- 0 0 O O H O H N m .1 VI w O m O ID N O C w 00 N W N W N m O m O V O m O 00 O O N N R v O n N vl lD m O V O C IA m O C o O VI T o lD H h H m m Vl Oq V V V1 ID H m H O H T N N N H T n 7 N H Ol r% R ID O N O O N H N H W N a It H Ol H M N VI Ol O1 n M ID H ID m W N n Ill IA m H n Ol V N a/1 tR V} V} VF VF VF V} VF to H VT H V} VI H N H N N Vf Vf Vf N H N N V1 N N H N Vf N O O O mom 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O Ill I11 O O O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O IA Ill N ry 0q 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o O O O O O N O Ill O O O O C NNNNN T m ID ID ttt N tlt N O n O n O NNNN O O o 0 N o N m NN m lD N l0 N o Ol o Ol o H o H o o m m m N m N V? N N O aq Vl Vl VI VI O 7 O R Ill Vf Ill VF H V' H V} m VT m N N N N VI N N N V1 H N H N R H N N N V! to N N H N H N O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O Ill 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O o 0 o 0 o 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O mo O N 0 O 0 O 0 00 0 N R O V OIll O O m ID lD vl n n" lD O n ow O N m w 00 V C N n O Ill O V Vl n 0 V 0 0 O O 0 m- 0 0 O 0 N 0 O O o VI N O V O O N � N n V N R N N M IO 00 N N ID n H H VI m Ol n 0 131H M m m m N m m a m V1 m VI m l0 n ? O R h V! to N N N V? Vf V? H h N V' VT to Vf Vf VT H h N H �A M' H h M' Vf to O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O VI Ill 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N N N N O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O 0 O O m O O m O moo m O O O o--"" H to Vf N N ID ID O vl O IA O Vf O Vf O Vl O N V1 H Ill H O N O H VF N Vi O ul O m IA n N n o O O O O N H IA H O m O m M to n N N Ill N o O V O C N N to �A 1A �A l/I 1A �A 4A to lA 1A H 1A 1A to 1A 1A to 4A Q Q Q Q Q Q LL J Q Q Q Q Vl V1 V1 LL VI J LL LL LL V1 LL Q Q Q Q Q gig Q Q Q Q A A A A W W W W W W W W W N W _ O O O O N N m m V N vl O lD N N 00 m N n ttt m 00 V Ol ID O 00 O 00 m n H Ill H T H O ID O W 00 N N N V m ID N O N m 00 lD M W n m N m Ill V Ill m n 00 H H N N O H m Ill H H ID N 1p m m VI m H H lD Ot v m H H H H m @ d d N N j U N N N N N N N c c O E,y O E N 1 N H N w N H jp N iD N w O O v .=t iry w w m N a a H N A w w ^ E E In ID a v ;y ;y v Ir y I=I A rry N L U m w m w w w a a N N N H N O O Cl PJ Cl C7 > A > N > G> IO IO N N N w d d w w C C Yil r^ .... •C •C w w w w tw.l w w r > > > u> U O >> O C\ C C w w a a N N tLJ ILJ 3 3 H N V V V V V V V O O O di O OD O J V w V w O O C .m C .m m rO 5 >> m m .-. C H m �. C N m m a l7 d U' 4 J 0 J 0 J 0 J>> 0 0 0 a a a a O V V N N O N U U u u 3' A w A w w w a w W w a v m m m m m m L v v v v "'I u m O u m O u c O u c 22 01 1O D a « N 1O ``y, „ m w y v L t >. O >, w w w w w w L In L In L In t In I/I C > O > O > O > O L u L u Y o m m 01 °1 << E E 'U"003 n O_ O_ n n n u u o 0 0 0° v N v v N o 0 1O o M o, w w °� '' o 0 0 m' m' 3? 3 3 --la -- A .=I dO N O C W C W C C V N C V' L 0 L 0 L C_ C W G W L L N N N O H u O U>> u Y N u Y i0 •p C 'O C 'O C C C C l7 l7 l7 l7 U N O d j l0 O d j N O v j N O v OC m CC CO a C Q a CC Q C C O O U U u Vl Vl Vl m _C 5 i K H K H m m H H lD V) Q w Q O w J J J J J H H VI lfl H l.7 I7 Ur Vr A a !O a N a A a N a N a A a N a N a a IO a 1p a rq a A a A a A a A a a a H N H N N N N N M N M N V N Ill N Vl ry IO N ID N n N n N m N W N OI N 01 N O T O H T _1_ H N m N M m m m m v m v M Ill M VI M lD ID M M n M n M W M a0 M Ol T O V o O et H 'R H of 3��: -IT no 00 N N1 m n m 00 0 N m m n O H m m N VY rn �° V_ n O N V O N -C3 N V1 rl N O N 0 O V I -IT no 00 N N1 m n m 00 0 N m m n O H m m N VY rn �° V_ n O N V O N O N Q Q O N 0 O V O ul N H Z Z N N O C N N N h vi W Vl V1 O � � I m � N m m m n n l0 �0 N N W t0 O n O O ul ul N N N O C O C O ul ul m o o ul v N 0 0 0 0 O O n a D -Ir O O m m li C_ O Oml H V/ N aA �A aA W u m K C N Q 0 0 o O 0 O O m 000 m N N N N N 0 0 N N h N O O G C) 0 0 O w o C O d` O N Vi e N O o V1 N V1 V VT o N iri vi .ti m ci u m O O O O O O OO O O O O O o O O O K v� O 00 N n N N 0 O O ul N w O O O O 01 Ol N 0 00 0 u a ai TC N N m m m 0 o h N H N Op v u ° N � d O O O O O O O C ow l!1 N ul N 10 w O O O O �A N ut O ul T ^ T K No N O 0 0 0 O O N u O O O O O O N O O N N u -Ir O O N m m m m Lq m O m Vl to O O N N '� N V ul ul VI ul ul N N N N n n m m O O O O O O o O o O H N N Vl N V1 N N O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O N n O O O O O O m D N N H N l�fl O ul O V h V VY Q N � m VT H N a h o O O O O 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 n n 0 0 o N ooo N N N o Vl o V1 o00 o v N N N Vf V1 N O O K O OO O O r O O 0 0 0 O Ci O O o 0 T. o 000 C o O O coC w coO w n O o 0 m m m N In 0 O o O vi O vi V vi u v N n N w ul lD ul h t/1 m N m � 01 V N N � a C m W u O O O O O O ul O O O O O O - o o N G O Ci 0 o o d O O N 0 000 O O V N V N C vi N vi N .ti VT .-i V} o V� 0 Vl m N m N H H O O O O u1 M ul O O O O m In N O w OO , O T ry n e{ a Ol H N a N m Ol m u N o C c 0' 0 D o o N N O_ O O N N O O 0 0 N Vl N N �A to O O O O O a 0 o O O O- C O O O O O m O H O O O ul ul ul R � w V1 ID H N N m m o N w N O 0 ooo O 0 O 0 O O - o o 6 o ui u1 ul n ul n ul Vl ul V1 O V1 O N N N �A N N O O r r J LL h In m O O O O OO m m u1 ul Ol Ol O lD O m O m O m O m O m u1 l0 O m N m m N �D m o+ d ul m m Ol Ol N ti ry Yii u m m N N w H � C O Vf N O O O O 000 0 N E N ° ° 0 m E � E E d` `m vmi N ry m ry m ry 10 Q y„ 'C N N N m Ol io m 4A u � v w 01 a y y m m o ut j. LL j Y C C d W C^ AY A (0 10 m 0 N oU C O � C O m m O ul n m x .` O 01 ul ul ul ul ul n a 13 d T n > > N w 3 d 3 w w o D t O L O w w Cl O o U c ti ti o 000 dd u u - N N c v v v a v � Q n d an d Q D no 00 N N1 m n m 00 0 N m m n O H m m N VY rn �° V_ n ' O ul N O O V C ul C of m m O O m 00 m vi W O O O O O I m � m m m m a C W t0 O n O O ul ul N m m N O O ul ul m o o ul v a a D � C_ O W u d ° C _ Q ° O O O O 0 0 0 O 15Lq O O O G C) 0 0 O w C O d` O m N Vi e N o N o V1 N V1 V VT o N u Q N Q ]t u O O O O O O O O OO O O O O o O O O d N H N n N N O O O O ul Vl ul N •C N N N W o a C n C � O Op v u ° � d OO O O 000 O C ow o 0 o O m o O n O O on O O �` ut O ul T ^ T K No N ron ul m K N N N �A N O1 d d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q '� N N ul ul VI ul ul d N N N n n m m V? N V} C � T h m N O O O O O O O O O O O O o o o.o O C W O O O m m w d u p• N N H N n N ut � ul � m N w Al O n �A V1 VT N a C m O O O O 0 0 0 J a u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 m•- v T c o o o00 o v c O O O O OO O O O O O O 0 0 0 O W O O o 0 u O C o O O coC w coO w n y d O m m ul ul N m N A N N h N N N U � a C m W u O O O O O O O O O O O O O O - o o o G O Ci 0 J d O O N O O C O O V N V N C � ul � H H H M a _ D m c o u ° C c 0' a O_ O O O o 0 0 0 0 O O- O O O O O ul C` vl N N R O C O O O- C O O m N R O V •-I N rl H N V1 N m d w o o 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 - ui ui o 6 o ui u1 to t/' N c o O N N N N C N O O � h O O O O OO O O C ° O O O O O lD O m O m O m O m O m O m N m m N �D N � d ul m m Ol Ol N N O Yii N N N N N w H � C O Vf O O O O 000 0 x E O O O O 0 E d` o o vmi N ry m ry m ry 10 Q y„ 'C N N N m Ol m O1 V} 4A � W H ' o ut O O O O O ul C^ N n O O 0 m 0 N oU m Ol n O O ul n m C .` O 01 ul ul ul ul ul n a 13 d T n H N N n � H N N to V1 ul C o U c ti ti o 000 dd u u - N N uOj V O 0 O 0 n 0 m � Q n d ul ul T O O m N U n Y 4A N N ul ul H N d C LL N N O ut N N rl N N > N m H N u Q O ooo° c m v m V m n n LL w J z m c •-I N �- W w. C C W N E E O ryd d Fn C C C c C C O O O OW Q o mm=oo°wV'l7 u u o d u O u 1O m E ma a m a m i a s v v a a I o P23 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer C'�H By: Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer �J Subject: CONSIDERATION TO RELEASE MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE BOND NO. 58726500M IN THE AMOUNT OF $54,068.16, FOR THE 8TH STREET FROM BAKER AVENUE TO HELLMAN AVENUE, BAKER AVENUE FROM MAIN STREET TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND 6TH STREET FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO HAVEN AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. 15-094 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Clerk to release Maintenance Guarantee Bond No. 58726500M in the amount of $54,068.16, for the 8th Street from Baker Avenue to Hellman Avenue, Baker Avenue from Main Street to Foothill Boulevard and 6th Street from Hermosa Avenue to Haven Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Project, Contract No. 15-094. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Contract No. 15-094 consisted of clearing and grubbing and pavement preparation, crack sealing, cold plane, asphalt concrete patching, asphalt rubber hot mix (ARHM) overlay, striping and pavement markings, and installation of traffic signal video detection systems. This contract was accepted as complete at the City Council meeting of November 17, 2015. The required one-year maintenance period has ended and the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship. Contractor: R. J. Noble Company P. O. Box 620 Orange, CA 92856 Attachment: Vicinity Map P25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8th STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION From 400' W10 Hellman Ave to Baker Ave BAKER AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION From Main St to Foothill Blvd 6TH STREET PAVEMENT REHABILITATION From Hermosa Ave to Haven Avenue STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineere=-Zrj By: Willie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS APPROVING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 313 AND STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR DRC2008-00909, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND AMETHYST STREET, SUBMITTED BY NAS ALTA LOMA, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolutions approving an Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Light Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for DRC2008-00909 and authorizing the Mayor to sign said agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Planning Commission approved DRC2008-00909 on January 22, 2014. This project consists of the proposed demolition of an existing veterinarian office and construction a new veterinarian office and a commercial retail building on a 0.60 acre of land located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Street, within the General Commercial (GC) District. The Developer, NAS Alta Loma LLC, has submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement Securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Cash Bond $ 61,800.00 Receipt No. 20899 Labor and Material Bond $ 61,800.00 Receipt No. 20899 Copies of the agreement, securities, and signed Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms are on file in the City Clerk's Office. Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution Nos. 16-192, 16-193, 16-194, 16-195 iWX INA RESOLUTION NO. 16-192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR DRC2008-00909 WHEREAS, DRC2008-00909, submitted by NAS Alta Loma LLC, located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Street, in the General Commercial (GC) District, was approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on January 22, 2014; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreement, be and the same is approved and the Mayor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and 2. That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney RESOLUTION NO. 16-192 — Page 1 of 1 RESOLUTION NO. 16-193 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) FOR DRC2008-00909 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver'); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. 16-193 — Page 1 of 5 P29 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. RESOLUTION NO. 16-193 — Page 2 of 5 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF LOT 6, BLOCK 8, OF CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6, THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT, 125.84 FEET; THENCE EAST 165 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT, 125.84 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, BEING THE NORTH LINE OF BASE LINE ROAD, THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF BASE LINE ROAD, 165 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 202-161-10,11 & 20 RESOLUTION NO. 16-193 — Page 3 of 5 P30 P31 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District): Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) (the "Maintenance District") represents landscape sites throughout the Commercial/Industrial Maintenance District. The various landscape sites that are maintained by this district consist of median islands, parkways, street trees and entry monuments. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2008-00909: STREET TREES 4 EACH RESOLUTION NO. 16-193 — Page 4 of 5 P32 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial Maintenance District) for DRC2008-00909: Land Use Basis EBU Rate per Factor* EBU* Commercial/ Industrial Acre 1.00 282.24 Vacant Acre 1.00 282.24 *EBU means Equivalent Benefit Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 0.67 Acre x 1 EBU Factor x $ 282.24 Rate per EBU = $ 189.19 Annual Assessment RESOLUTION NO. 16-193 — Page 5 of 5 P33 RESOLUTION NO. 16-194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR DRC2008-00909 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. 16-194 — Page 1 of 5 P34 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. RESOLUTION NO. 16-194 — Page 2 of 5 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF LOT 6, BLOCK 8, OF CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6, THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT, 125.84 FEET; THENCE EAST 165 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT, 125.84 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, BEING THE NORTH LINE OF BASE LINE ROAD, THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF BASE LINE ROAD, 165 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 202-161-10, 11 & 20 RESOLUTION NO. 16-194 — Page 3 of 5 P35 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District') is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2008-00909: STREET LIGHT 1 (EXISTING) BASE LINE ROAD RESOLUTION NO. 16-194 — Page 4 of 5 P37 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for DRC2008-00909: Land Use Basis EBU Rate per Factor* EBU* Single Family Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi -Family Parcel 1.00 17.77 Commercial Acre 2.00 17.77 Vacant Acre 2.00 17.77 *EBU means Equivalent Benefit Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 0.67 Acre x 2 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $ 23.81 Annual Assessment RESOLUTION NO. 16-194 — Page 5 of 5 f:7���Aij�[�Iiali'L��il�l•� A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL) FOR DRC2008-00909 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/[ndustrial)(the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and RESOLUTION NO. 16-195 — Page 1 of 5 P39 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. c. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. RESOLUTION NO. 16-195 — Page 2 of 5 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL The legal description of the Property is: THAT PORTION OF LOT 6, BLOCK 8, OF CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 6, THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT, 125.84 FEET; THENCE EAST 165 FEET; THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT, 125.84 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT, BEING THE NORTH LINE OF BASE LINE ROAD, THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF BASE LINE ROAD, 165 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 202-161-10, 11 & 20 RESOLUTION NO. 16-195 — Page 3 of 5 WK all Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (the "Maintenance District') is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in a local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the industrial area of the City south of Foothill Boulevard I The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on industrial or commercial streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on industrial or commercial streets generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project DRC2008-00909: STREET LIGHT 1 EACH RESOLUTION NO. 16-195 — Page 4 of 5 iiy: Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2016/2017 Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial): The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial/Industrial) forDRC2008-00909: Land Use EBU Rate per Basis Factor* EBU* Commercial/ Industrial Acre 1.00 51.40 Vacant Acre 2.00 51.40 *EBU means Equivalent Benefit Unit. The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 0.67 Acre x 1 EBU Factor x $51.40 Rate per EBU = $ 34.44 Annual Assessment RESOLUTION NO. 16-195 — Page 5 of 5 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer -1—b-1 By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF TIME EXTENSION TO AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR DRC2014-00566, LOCATED AT 10220 4TH STREET, SUBMITTED BY TREF RANCHO, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a time extension to the Improvement Agreement for DRC2014-00566 and associated security, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the time -extension. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2014-00566 for the construction of a 116,480 square foot industrial building located at 10220 4th Street was approved by the Planning Commission on January 28, 2015. The conditions of approval for the project require the construction of public improvements including pavement repair, curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveways, street lights, and landscaping. The City Council approved an Improvement agreement and associated security listed below on November 4, 2015 to guarantee the construction of the public improvements. Faithful Performance Bond: $ 103,300.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 103,300.00 The developer, TREF Rancho, LLC, has submitted a request for a 12 -month time -extension to the Improvement Agreement. Completion of the public improvements has been delayed while Southern California Edison performs work to relocate existing utility poles to allow for construction of the public improvements. Final improvements will be installed after the relocation work is complete. A copy of the time -extension to the Improvement Agreement is available in the City Clerk's office. Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution No. 16-196 8547 GROVE AVENUE ARROW RT 4W4 i Y�E LN 8547 GROVE AVE. 4 NORTH IZN P45 RESOLUTION NO. 16-196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME - EXTENSION TO AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2014-00566 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration a Time -Extension to an Improvement Agreement executed on December 7, 2016, by TREF Rancho, LLC, as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of 4 t Street, west of Center Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DRC2014-00566; and WHEREAS, said Time -Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Time -Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Time -Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. RESOLUTION NO. 16-196 — Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Cb,J By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND AND FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2015-00111, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND GOLDEN PRAIRIE DRIVE, SUBMITTED BY PULTE HOMES. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the public improvements for DRC2015-00111, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion, and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC 2015-00111 for the construction of five single-family residences located at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Golden Prairie Drive was approved by the Planning Commission on August 12, 2015. As a condition of approval for DRC2015-00111, the applicant was required to complete street improvements consisting of drive approaches, street trees, sidewalk, curbside drains, curb and gutter and landscaping. The public improvements have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and it is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and the City Clerk to release the associated Faithful Performance Bond listed below. These improvements were completed and approved by the City Engineer in January 2016. A recent inspection found no deficiencies in materials or workmanship. Therefore, a maintenance bond is not be required. Developer: Pulte Homes: 27101 Puerta Real, Suite 300 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Release: Faithful Performance Bond Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution No. 16-197 CMS281951 $ 44,200.00 (Bond No.) 1 VICINITY MAP D RC2015-00111 G� �tq Ric OR GOLDEN PRAIRIE DR. DRC2015-00111 1& NORTH FEW RESOLUTION NO. 16-197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR DRC2015-00111 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for DR2015-00111 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work is complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. RESOLUTION NO. 16-197 — Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer 4:ne By: Carlo Cambare, Engineering Technician Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL TO RELEASE THE RETAINED RESTORATION CASH DEPOSIT IN LIEU OF THE LABOR AND MATERIAL AND MAINTENANCE BONDS FOR 8547 GROVE AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY DAVID DOMINGUES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the release of the Restoration Cash Deposit in the amount of $1,000.00 submitted by David Domingues and used in lieu of the Labor and Material and Maintenance Bonds to secure the construction of the public improvements. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The owner of the existing vacant parcel located at 8547 Grove Avenue requested to install certain public street improvements consisting of pavement widening, curb and gutter, and driveway improvements in order to make the property more appealing in anticipation of selling it in the future. Right -of -Way Permit No. ROW2015-00116 was issued for the construction of the public improvements on April 20, 2015. The improvements were completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and accepted by the City Council on May 18, 2016. Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council release the Restoration Cash Deposit in the amount of $1,000 used in lieu of the Labor and Material and Maintenance Bonds. Attachments: Vicinity Map E ARROW W✓Y IMNZO TREE LN 8547 GROVE AVENUE FrROM AT Z 8547 GROVE AVE. caux+waio sr NITH �k CRAWE GAME ST ' STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer G By: Charlie Moussa, Engineering Technician Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A TIME -EXTENSION TO THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR DRC2006-01012, LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, SUBMITTED BY CHASE BACK BAY, LLC RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a time -extension to the Improvement Agreement for DRC2006-01012 and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said time -extension. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS DRC2006-01012 for the construction of a 28,860 square foot warehouse/office building on the northeast corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue was approved by the Planning Commission on August 13, 2008. The conditions of approval for the project require the construction of public improvements along the project frontage on 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue including roadway widening, curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, and landscaping improvements. On November 4, 2015, the City Council approved an Improvement Agreement and the following improvement security submitted by the developer, Chase Back Bay, LLC, to guarantee construction of the public improvements. Faithful Performance Bond: $ 206,300.00 Labor and Material Bond: $ 206,300.00 The developer, Chase Back Bay, LLC, has submitted a request for a 12 -month time -extension to the Improvement Agreement. Completion of the public improvements has been delayed while the developer coordinates funding for the undergrounding of existing overhead utilities along the project frontage as required by the project's conditions of approval. A copy of the time -extension to the Improvement Agreement for DRC20016-01012 is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Attachments: Vicinity Map Resolution No. 16-198 P52 RESOLUTION NO. 16-198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TIME - EXTENSION TO THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR DRC2006-01012 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its Consideration a Time -Extension to an Improvement Agreement executed on November 4, 2015, By Chase Back Bay, LLC, as the developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located north east corner of 6t' Street and Charles Smith Avenue; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said DRC2006-01012; and WHEREAS, said Time -Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in the Time -Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, that said Time -Extension and Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Time Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. RESOLUTION NO. 16-198 — Page 1 of 1 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer C� By: Albert Espinoza, Assistant City Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENTS FOR ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE AREA MASTER PLAN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND AN APPROPRIATION OF $258,898.78 FROM THE ETIWANDA/SAN SEVAINE DRAINAGE FUND (FUND 116) TO ACCOUNT NO. 1116303-5650/1026116-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve reimbursements for the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Master Plan Drainage Improvements for Fiscal Year 2015/16 and an appropriation of $258,898.78 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 116) to Account No. 1116303-5650/1026116-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Developers who are conditioned by the City to construct master planned drainage facilities necessary for proper drainage of their subdivisions enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City. Annual reimbursements are made pursuant to these agreements based on the gross Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage fees received each fiscal year. Following the closing of the City's financial books each fiscal year, fifty percent (50%) of all Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage fees collected during each fiscal year are set aside into a "planned drainage reimbursement fund." The City pays the developers the amount set aside in the planned drainage reimbursement fund. A fractional share is determined as follows: The numerator shall be the original reimbursement sum for the developer and the denominator shall be the total of the original reimbursement sums for all developers who are eligible to share in the planned drainage reimbursement fund for each fiscal year. All developer's rights to reimbursement shall cease at the end of the ten (10) years after the fiscal year in which the developer first became eligible for reimbursement, whether or not fully paid. There are two active agreements with developers, JT Storm/Claudia Storm Trust and Toll Brothers, with a total outstanding reimbursement amount of $477,759.72 from Fiscal Year 2014/15. Based on fees collected in Fiscal Year 2015/16, the amount currently due to be reimbursed is $258,898.78. The remaining balance of $218,860.95 will be eligible for reimbursement in future years subject to the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement. Since the amount of funds available for reimbursement under this program is determined following the close of the City's financial books each fiscal year, funds to cover reimbursements have not been included in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 budget. Therefore staff is requesting an appropriation in the amount of $258,898.78 from the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Drainage Fund (Fund 112) to Account No. 1116303-5650/1026116-0 along with approval of the reimbursements listed below. Original Previous Reimbursement Agmt Expiration Project / Agreement Fractional Balance Amount Remaining No. No. Year Developer Amount Share 2014-15 2015-16 Balance TR 16279-1 / TOLL 1 DRA-38 2018 BROTHERS $719,477.95 0.726818123 $276,177.17 $188,172.32 $88,004.85 TR 16716 / 2 DRA-41 2021 JT Storm $270,423.00 0.273181877 $201,582.55 $70,726.45 $130,856.10 TOTAL $989,900.95 1 $477,759.72 $258,898.78 $218,860.95 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Cy By: Albert Espinoza, Assistant City Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF REIMBURSEMENTS FOR GENERAL CITY MASTER PLAN DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015/16 AND AN APPROPRIATION OF $69,438.76 FROM THE GENERAL CITY DRAINAGE FUND (FUND 112) TO ACCOUNT NO. 1112303-5650/1026112-0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve reimbursements for General City Master Plan Drainage Improvements for Fiscal Year 2015/16 and an appropriation of $69,438.76 from the General City Drainage Fund (Fund 112) to Account No. 1112303-5650/1026112-0. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Developers who are conditioned by the City to construct master planned drainage facilities necessary for proper drainage of their subdivisions enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with the City. Annual reimbursements are made pursuant to these agreements based on the gross General City Drainage fees received each fiscal year. Following the closing of the City's financial books for each fiscal year, twenty-five percent (25%) of all General City Drainage fees collected during each fiscal year is set aside into a "planned drainage reimbursement fund." The City pays the developers the amount set aside in the planned drainage reimbursement fund. A fractional share is determined as follows: The numerator shall be the original reimbursement sum for the developer and the denominator shall be the total of the original reimbursement sums for all developers who are eligible to share in the planned drainage reimbursement fund for each fiscal year. All developer's rights to reimbursement shall cease at the end of the ten (10) years after the fiscal year in which the developer first became eligible for reimbursement, whether or not fully paid. There is one active agreement with Lewis Investment Co, LLC with a total outstanding reimbursement amount of $77,394.98 from Fiscal Year 2014/15. Based on fees collected in Fiscal Year 2015/16, the amount currently due to be reimbursed is $69,438.76. The remaining balance of $7,956.22 will be eligible for reimbursement in future years subject to the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement. Since the amount of funds available for reimbursement under this program is determined following the close of the City's financial books each fiscal year, funds to cover reimbursements have not been included in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 budget. Therefore staff is requesting an appropriation in the amount of $69,438.76 from the General City Drainage Fund (Fund 112) to Account No. 1112303-5650/1026112-0 along with approval of a reimbursement to Lewis Investment Co, LLC in the same amount as listed below. Original Previous Agmt Expiration Project / Agreement Fractional Balance Reimbursement Remaining No. No. Year Developer Amount Share 2014-15 2015-16 Balance TR 17382 / Lewis Investment 1 DRA-40 2019 Co, LLC $1,064,264.49 1 $77,394.98 $69,438.76 $7,956.22 TOTAL $1,064,264.49 1 $77,394.98 $69,438.76 $7,956.22 P55 STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 7 Date: December 7, 2016 ii RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Natalie Avila, Associate Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF VIDEO DETECTION SYSTEM EQUIPMENT FOR FIFTEEN (15) INTERSECTIONS CITYWIDE FROM THE SUPPLIER, RODEFX INC., IN THE AMOUNT OF $334,727.64, FOR USE IN THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL VIDEO DETECTION AT FIFTEEN LOCATIONS PROJECT AND TO BE FUNDED FROM MEASURE I AND GAS TAX R&T7360 FUNDS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve a single source purchase of video detection system (VDS) equipment manufactured by Iteris, Inc. for fifteen (15) intersections from the supplier, Rodefx Inc., in the amount of $334,727.64, for use in the Traffic Signal Video Detection at Fifteen Locations Project and to be funded from Measure I and Gas Tax R&T7360 Funds as budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2016/17 budget. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City of Rancho Cucamonga is actively investing in improving traffic management operations throughout the City. As part of this effort, the City is replacing existing in -ground inductive loop detection systems with VDS in conjunction with new traffic signal projects and pavement overlay projects. VDS provides greater flexibility in making adjustments for detection of the vehicles and bicycles that utilize our streets, allows for remote observation of traffic signal operations, and provides better detection of bicycles than traditional in - ground loop detectors. Currently 50 of the City's 193 traffic signals are equipped with a VDS with the majority of these systems being manufactured by Iteris, Inc. and supplied to our contractors by, their regional representative, Rodefx Inc. In conjunction with various pavement rehabilitation projects scheduled for this fiscal year, 15 existing traffic signal controlled intersections are proposed to be upgraded to provide video detection of vehicular and bicycle traffic and install additional equipment to enable the ability to count the volume of pedestrians using each intersection. The material necessary -to accomplish a full upgrade consists of the installation of new traffic signal video detection cameras, including new video cables in existing conduits, removal of existing detector cables from conduit and updating controllers in the controller cabinet. The project will eliminate the necessity for the traffic signal loop installations with the upcoming overlay projects saving the city the cost of these installations and the replacement of loops in the future if they are damaged or need to be adjusted. Staff is requesting a single source purchase of this equipment in an effort to reduce the costs of upgrades and to provide for standardization of equipment. Standardization of equipment allows staff to operate the city's video systems from a single management system, minimizes the number of replacement parts needed on -hand for maintenance, and allows staff to gain an in-depth familiarity with the operation and maintenance of the equipment. As mentioned above, the majority of the City's existing VDS equipment is manufactured by Iteris. The VDS equipment currently supplied by Iteris meets the City's needs and would provide standardization as the system is expanded city-wide. As well, purchasing of VDS equipment directly from the manufacturer's regional representative is anticipated to provide an overall cost savings for the Traffic Signal Video Detection at Fifteen Locations Project of approximately 15% due to the elimination of the installing contractor's markup (typically 15-20%). CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT - SINGLE SOURCE PURCHASE ORDER TO RODEFX, INC. December 7, 2016 Page 2 Engineering Services staff provided justification and an explanation of each component of the VDS to Purchasing Division in accordance with the City's Purchasing Policy and Procedures, the Single Source Justification documents will be on file with the City Engineer. STAFF REPORT ^k P57 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT � Date: December 7, 2016 RANCHO To: Mayor and Members of the City Council CUCAMONGA John R. Gillison, City Manager From: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer C6-10 By: Romeo David, Associate Engineer Shelley Hayes, Assistant Engineer Subject: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE BIDS RECEIVED AND AWARD AND AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $177,000, TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BIDDER, HARDY & HARPER, INC., AND AUTHORIZE THE EXPENDITURE OF A 10% CONTINGENCY IN THE AMOUNT OF $17,700, FOR THE RED HILL PARK PEDESTRIAN TRAIL RENOVATION PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $226,540 FROM PARK DISTRICT PD -85 FUND (FUND 848), TO FUND THE CONTRACT AS WELL AS RELATED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT COSTS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept the bids received and award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $177,000, to the lowest responsive bidder, Hardy & Harper, Inc., and authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $17,700, for the Red Hill Park Pedestrian Trail Renovation Project, and authorize appropriations in the total amount of $226,540 from Park District PD -85 Fund (Fund 848), to fund the contract as well as related construction management costs. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The existing pedestrian walking trail at Red Hill Park has reached the end of its service life and is in need of replacement. On November 2, 2016 the City Council authorized staff to receive bids for the removal and replacement of the walking trail. Staff solicited, received and opened bids on November 22, 2016, for the subject project. The Engineer's estimate for the base bid was $222,850. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder meets the requirements of the bid documents. The scope of work consists of removal and replacement of the existing pedestrian walking trail with a new asphalt surface. The contract documents call for forty (40) working days to complete this construction and the work will be phased in order to minimize impacts to park users. Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows: Construction Contract (Base Bid) $177,000 Construction Contract Contingency (10%) $ 17,700 Construction Management $ 31,840 Estimated Construction Costs $226,540 It is recommended that funds in the amount of $226,540 be appropriated from the Park Development PD - 85 Fund (Fund 884) to Account No. 1848303-5650/1788848-0 in the amount of $226,540 to fund the contract as well as related construction management costs. Attachment: Vicinity Map CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RED HILL PARK PEDESTRIAN TRAIL RENOVATION PROJECT P59 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Candyce Burnett, City Planner© By: Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: CONSIDERATION OF AN EXTENSION OF URGENCY ORDINANCE NO 900 FOR AN ADDITIONAL 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS PROHIBITING ALL COMMERCIAL CANNABIS USES IN THE CITY, PROHIBITING OUTDOOR MARIJUANA CULTIVATION ON PRIVATE RESIDENCES, AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS REGARDING INDOOR CULTIVATION IN PRIVATE RESIDENCES RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt an extension to Urgency Ordinance No. 900, prohibiting all commercial cannabis uses in the City, prohibiting outdoor marijuana cultivation on private residences and adopting regulations regarding indoor cultivation in private residences. If an extension is approved the new expiration date for the urgency ordinance would be November 15, 2017. A four-fifths vote of the Council is required. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On November 16, 2016, the City Council approved Urgency Ordinance No. 900, determining that there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety, and welfare presented by the potential establishment and operation of commercial cannabis activities under the recent approval of Proposition 64, which is also known as the California Marijuana Legalization Initiative and the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act ("AMUA"). The AUMA, among other things, legalizes the use of non-medical marijuana for those who are 21 years of age or older and establishes a comprehensive system to regulate commercial non-medical marijuana activity. The provisions of the AUMA related to the possession, use, and cultivation of non-medical marijuana became effective on November 9, 2016, which created an urgent need for further City action to maintain local control. Pursuant to State law, Government Code Section 65858, Urgency Ordinance No. 900 is effective for a period of 45 days from the date of adoption. Without further action by the Council, Urgency Ordinance No. 900 is set to expire on December 31, 2016. Under Government Code Section 65858 the Council can extend the interim ordinance for up to 10 months and 15 days, allowing the city additional time to study the contemplated land use change. Prior to the expiration of an interim ordinance, a permanent ordinance must be adopted by noticed public hearing or the changes included in the urgency ordinance will expire. The AUMA permits cities to: (1) adopt and enforce local ordinances to regulate non-medical marijuana businesses, including, but not limited to, local zoning and land use requirements, business license requirements, and requirements related to reducing exposure to secondhand smoke, or (2) completely prohibit the establishment or operation of one or more types of marijuana businesses within its jurisdiction. The AUMA also grants State agencies the authority to create, issue, renew, discipline, suspend, or revoke licenses for marijuana businesses provided that a State licensing authority shall not approve an application for a State license for commercial non-medical marijuana activity if approval of '.1 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT COMMERCIAL CANNABIS ACTIVITY, EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDINANCE December 7, 2016 Page 2 the State license will violate the provisions of any local ordinance. Furthermore, the AUMA requires the State to begin issuing licenses to non-medical marijuana businesses by January 1, 2018. The AUMA allows for the planting, cultivation, harvesting, drying, and processing ("cultivation activities") of up to six marijuana plants in, or upon the grounds of, a private residence. The AUMA authorizes a city to enact and enforce an ordinance that reasonably regulates cultivation activities, and to completely prohibit cultivation activities outdoors upon the grounds of a private residence unless the California Attorney General determines that non-medical use of marijuana is lawful in the State under Federal law. The Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq., classifies marijuana as a Schedule 1 Drug, which is defined as a drug or other substance that has a high potential for abuse, that has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and that has not been accepted as safe for use under medical supervision. The Federal Controlled Substances Act makes it unlawful under Federal law for any person to cultivate, manufacture, distribute or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense marijuana. Cities in California have reported negative effects of marijuana cultivation, processing, and distribution activities, including offensive odors, illegal sales and distribution of marijuana, trespassing, theft, violent robberies and robbery attempts, fire hazards, and problems associated with mold, fungus, and pests. Furthermore, as marijuana plants begin to flower, and for a period of two months or more, the plants produce a strong, unique odor, offensive to many people, and detectable far beyond property boundaries if grown outdoors. This odor can have the effect of encouraging theft by alerting persons to the location of the valuable plants, and creating a risk of burglary, robbery, or armed robbery of the plants and creating the potential for violent acts related to such criminal activity. Urgency Ordinance No. 900 does the following: (1) prohibit all commercial non-medical marijuana activities within the City, including but not limited to commercial cultivation, sales and deliveries, (2) prohibits outdoor cultivation on a private residence and (3) permit indoor cultivation as required by the AMUA, limited to six live plants to be planted, cultivated, harvested, dried, or processed within a single private residence or inside a fully enclosed and secured accessory structure located upon the grounds of a private residence that is fully enclosed and secured. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT The project is deemed to be exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no probability that the proposed urgency ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment because the ordinance will impose greater limitations on development in the City, and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. CORRESPONDENCE Notice of the public hearing was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on November 25, 2016. JN/jp Attachment: Interim Ordinance 900-A P61 ORDINANCE NO. 900-A AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 900, PROHIBITING ALL COMMERCIAL NON-MEDICAL MARIJUANA ACTIVITY IN THE CITY, PROHIBITING OUTDOOR MARIJUANA CULTIVATION ON PRIVATE RESIDENCES, AND ADOPTING REGULATIONS REGARDING INDOOR CULTIVATION IN PRIVATE RESIDENCES AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF A. Recitals. 1. On November 16, 2016, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 900, prohibiting all commercial cannabis uses in the City, prohibiting outdoor marijuana cultivation on private residences and adopting regulations regarding indoor cultivation in private residences. 2. On December 7, 2016, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the extension of Urgency Ordinance No. 900. Ten (10) days prior to the expiration of Urgency Ordinance No. 900, the City Council will issue a report as described in Government Code Section 65858(d). 3. Pursuant to the authority set forth in Government Code Section 65858(a), it is the intent of the City Council in adopting this Urgency Ordinance to extend Urgency Ordinance No. 900 and to continue to prohibiting all commercial cannabis uses in the City, prohibiting outdoor marijuana cultivation on private residences and adopting regulations regarding indoor cultivation in private residences for a period of ten (10) months, fifteen (15) days based on the findings set forth below. 4. The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act ("AUMA") was approved by the voters on November 8, 2016. The AUMA, among other things, legalizes the use of non-medical marijuana for those who are 21 years of age or older and establishes a comprehensive system to regulate commercial non-medical marijuana activity. The provisions of the AUMA related to the possession, use, and cultivation of non-medical marijuana became effective on November 9, 2016. 5. The AUMA permits cities to: (1) adopt and enforce local ordinances to regulate non-medical marijuana businesses, including, but not limited to, local zoning and land use requirements, business license requirements, and requirements related to reducing exposure to secondhand smoke, or (2) completely prohibit the establishment or operation of one or more types of marijuana businesses within its jurisdiction. 6. The AUMA grants State agencies the authority to create, issue, renew, discipline, suspend, or revoke licenses for marijuana businesses provided that a State licensing authority shall not approve an application for a State license for commercial non - 1 M medical marijuana activity if approval of the State license will violate the provisions of any local ordinance. Furthermore, the AUMA requires the State to begin issuing licenses to non-medical marijuana businesses by January 1, 2018. 7. The AUMA allows for the planting, cultivation, harvesting, drying, and processing ("cultivation activities") of up to six marijuana plants in, or upon the grounds of, a private residence. The AUMA authorizes a city to enact and enforce an ordinance that reasonably regulates cultivation activities, and to completely prohibit cultivation activities outdoors upon the grounds of a private residence unless the California Attorney General determines that non-medical use of marijuana is lawful in the State under federal law. 8. The Federal Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801, et seq., classifies marijuana as a Schedule 1 Drug, which is defined as a drug or other substance that has a high potential for abuse, that has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and that has not been accepted as safe for use under medical supervision. The Federal Controlled Substances Act makes it unlawful under Federal law for any person to cultivate, manufacture, distribute or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense marijuana. 9. Cities in California have reported negative effects of marijuana cultivation, processing, and distribution activities, including offensive odors, illegal sales and distribution of marijuana, trespassing, theft, violent robberies and robbery attempts, fire hazards, and problems associated with mold, fungus, and pests. Furthermore, as marijuana plants begin to flower, and for a period of two months or more, the plants produce a strong, unique odor, offensive to many people, and detectable far beyond property boundaries if grown outdoors. This odor can have the effect of encouraging theft by alerting persons to the location of the valuable plants, and creating a risk of burglary, robbery, or armed robbery of the plants and creating the potential for violent acts related to such criminal activity. 10. The City has introduced and conducted a second reading of Ordinance No. 897 that prohibits all cannabis (also known as marijuana) cultivation and commercial cannabis uses in the City. Ordinance No. 897 will go into effect on December 2, 2016. Ordinance No. 897 was enacted in response to the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act, which established a State licensing scheme related to medical cannabis and primarily prohibits medical cannabis activities. 11. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. P63 Section 2. Based upon facts found to be true in Section 1 of this Ordinance and all other information available to the City Council concerning the subject matter of this Ordinance, the City Council finds that commercial cannabis activities and the unregulated cultivation of marijuana pursuant to the AUMA in the City before the City has an opportunity to adopt regulations pursuant to the standard procedures of the City would create a public health and safety danger. Based on the City's need for additional time to fully evaluate the primary and secondary effects of the activities to be licensed under the AUMA, the City Council finds that the immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare requires that this interim Ordinance be enacted as an urgency ordinance pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 and take effect immediately upon adoption, and its urgency is hereby declared. Section 3. Definitions. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the following words shall have the meanings set forth below unless the context otherwise permits or requires: "AUMA" refers to the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act. "Commercial non-medical marijuana activity" shall include the cultivation, possession, manufacture, distribution, processing, storing, laboratory testing, labeling, transportation, delivery, or sale of marijuana and marijuana products for non-medical purposes. "Cultivation" shall include any activity involving the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, curing, grading, or trimming of marijuana. "Delivery" shall mean the commercial transfer of marijuana or marijuana products to a customer. Delivery also includes the use by a retailer of any technology platform owned and controlled by retailer, or independently licensed under the AUMA that enables customers to arrange for or facilitate the commercial transfer by a State licensed retailer of marijuana or marijuana products. "Marijuana" shall include all parts of the plant Cannabis sativa L., whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin. It does not include (a) industrial hemp, as defined in Section 11018.5 of the Health and Safety Code; (b) the weight of any other ingredient combined with marijuana to prepare topical or oral administrations, food, drink, or other product; and (c) marijuana that is cultivated, processed, transported, distributed, or sold for medical purposes under Chapter 3.4 of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code. Section 4. Prohibitions and Regulations. a. Commercial non-medical marijuana activity is expressly prohibited in all zones and all specific plan areas in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. No person shall establish, operate, maintain, conduct, or allow commercial non-medical marijuana activity anywhere within the City. No application for a building permit, conditional use permit, business license, or any other entitlement authorizing the establishment, operation, maintenance, development, or construction of any use that allows for commercial non- 1 medical marijuana activity shall be accepted or approved during the term of the prohibition established in this Ordinance. b. This Section 4 is intended in part to prohibit all activities for which a State license is required pursuant to the AUMA. Accordingly, the City shall not issue any permit, license, or other entitlement for any activity for which a State license is required under the AUMA. The City shall also not issue any local license to a non-profit pursuant to provisions of Business and Professions Code section 26070.5. C. To the extent not already prohibited elsewhere in this Section 4, delivery of marijuana, marijuana products, or both originating in the City, terminating in the City, or both is expressly prohibited. No person shall conduct or perform any delivery of any marijuana or marijuana product, which delivery either originates in the City, terminates in the City, or both. d. Marijuana shall not be cultivated outdoors upon the grounds of a private residence. Indoor marijuana cultivation will be allowed only as set forth in State law, which permits no more than six live marijuana plants to be planted, cultivated, harvested, dried, or processed within a single private residence or inside a fully enclosed and secured accessory structure located upon the grounds of a private residence that is fully enclosed and secured. No person shall cultivate marijuana in any manner that causes any of the following conditions: 1. Light, glare, odor, noise, or vibration that is or whose effect is either detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare or interferes with the reasonable enjoyment of life or property; or 2. Any violation of Section 17.64.120 of the Municipal Code. e. Any marijuana cultivation that exceeds the limits set forth in this Section 4 is prohibited, is unlawful, and constitutes a public nuisance. f. Nothing in this Ordinance or its adoption shall be deemed to affect any other prohibitions or regulations relating to marijuana in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, Ordinance No. 897, except to the extent that State law allows cultivation of marijuana consistent with the restrictions set forth in this Ordinance. The City will not enforce those provisions of Ordinance No. 897 that prohibit the personal indoor cultivation of up to 6 live marijuana plants in a manner consistent with State law and subsections d and a above. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be deemed to affect or excuse any violation of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code or of Ordinance No. 897, except as otherwise described in this Section 4. g. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be interpreted to the effect that the City's permissive zoning scheme allows any other use not specifically listed therein. Section 5. Public Nuisance. Any use or condition caused, or permitted to exist, in violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall be, and hereby is declared to be, a P65 public nuisance and may be summarily abated by the City pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 731 or by any other remedy available to the City. Section 6. Penalty. Violation of any provision of this Ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor and shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) or by imprisonment for a period not to exceed six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each and every day such a violation exists shall constitute a separate and distinct violation of this Ordinance. Section 7. Civil Penalties. In addition to any other enforcement permitted by this Ordinance, the City Attorney may bring a civil action for injunctive relief and civil penalties against any person or entity that violates this Interim Ordinance. In any civil action brought pursuant to this Interim Ordinance, a court of competent jurisdiction may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to the prevailing party. Section 8. CEQA. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of the Interim Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment because the Interim Ordinance will only impose greater and temporary limitations on marijuana -related uses allowed in the City, and will thereby serve to prevent potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. The City Council has reviewed staff's determination of exemption and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in staff's determination that the Interim Ordinance is exempt from CEQA. The adoption of the Interim Ordinance is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 10. Term. This Ordinance shall take effect concurrent with the expiration of Urgency Ordinance No. 900 at midnight on December 31, 2016, and shall remain in effect for a period of ten (10) months, fifteen (15) days is adopted as an urgency, interim ordinance and shall take effect immediately. This Ordinance shall expire, and the prohibition established hereby shall terminate, 45 days after the date of adoption unless extended by the City Council pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858. Section 11. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance. L. Dennis Michael Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of November 2016, and was passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 16th day of November 2016, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds City Clerk '.: Urgency Ordinance No. 900-A Cannabis Uses and Cultivation Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) • Proposition 64 was approved by the voters in California on November 8. • AUMA legalizes the use of non-medical marijuana for those 21 and over. • Allows cultivation activities of up to 6 marijuana plants in or on the grounds of a private residence. • Establishes a comprehensive system to regulate non- medical marijuana activity. Urgency Ordinance 900 • Prohibits all commercial non-medical marijuana activities within the City, including cultivation, sales and deliveries. • Prohibits outdoor cultivation on a private residence. • Permits cultivation of up to 6 plants per residence for personal use within • an enclosed residence or • enclosed and secured accessory structure. • Personal indoor cultivation shall not create any light, glare, odor, noise or vibration impacts. Urgency Ordinance 900-A • Urgency Ordinance 900 set to expire on December 31, 2016. • Extends Urgency Ordinance 900 for an additional 10 months and 15 days. • If approved, Urgency Ordinance will now expire on November 15, 2017. • Staff to collaborate with the City Attorney to develop a permanent ordinance. Recommendation Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Urgency Ordinance 900-A, extending Urgency Ordinance 900 for an additional 10 months and 15 days prohibiting all commercial cannabis uses in the City, prohibiting outdoor marijuana cultivation on private residences and adopting regulations regarding indoor cultivation on private residences. P67 STAFF REPORT Date: December 7, 2016 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council and Fire Board John Gillison, City Manager From: Michelle Keith, Community Services Director Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Candyce Burnett, Planning Director Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manager Danielle Boldt, Police Chief Mike Costello, Fire Chief By: Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manager Jennifer Brown, Management Analyst II Tiffany Cooper, Management Analyst I I Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner Subject: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TO CONSIDER PROPOSED FEE ADJUSTMENTS FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council and Board conduct the public hearing and adopt the amendment to Resolution Numbers 07-047, 10-165, 12-196, 14-003, and 16-004 to revise or adopt user fees for Animal Services, Community Improvement, Community Services, Engineering Services, Planning, and Police Department; adopt Resolution No. FD 16-030 for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District approving new permit fees; and adopt Resolution No. 16-200 amending Resolution No. 14-102 to revise citywide Transportation Development Impact Fees. BACKGROUND The City and Fire District can impose fees under the authority granted by California Government Code Section 66000 et. Seq, including the requirement to hold at least one public hearing as part of a regularly scheduled meeting to allow for public comment on its proposed fees. Fees are allowed to be imposed in order to recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes. This report covers requests for revisions to fees for the following work groups: Animal Services, Community Improvement, Community Services, Engineering Services, Planning, and Police Services, as well as the Fire District. The corresponding cost analyses were placed on file in the City Clerk's office on November 21, 2016 and amended on November 28, 2016 with corrections to the Transportation Development Impact Fee Calculation and fees imposed for parking violations. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED FEE AMENDMENTS FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS DECEMBER 7, 2016 PAGE2 ANIMAL SERVICES The Animal Center reviews the fee schedule on an annual basis. After considerations of current costs, relevancy of current fees and a survey conducted of surrounding cities and counties, the following adjustments are recommended: Animal Adoptions: Increase the adoption fee for puppies under six months of age to $150. Puppies under 6 months of age average higher medical and foster care costs including multiple sets of vaccinations. Veterinary Services: Fee adjustments are needed for cost recovery of emergency lifesaving veterinary services provided to stray animals whose owners are later located. The Animal Center also provides onsite spay and neuter programs for stray animals that are reunited with their owners. Additionally, the Animal Center offers several community spay and neuter programs. The recommended fees and adjustments provide consistent fees to pet owners for the necessary care of a found pet while in the care of the Animal Center and allows the City to provide a continuous high level of service. Deceased Animal Disposal: The Animal Center works in partnership with Gateway Pet Cemetery and Crematory to provide owner requested cremation services for their deceased pet. The Animal Center acts as an intermediary between the customer and Gateway to assist the owner during their difficult time. The recommended fees a $5 processing fee, plus the actual fees for Gateway Pet Cemetery. Field Services: Veterinary Investigations (Time & Reporting): This fee is used for restitution in an animal cruelty or abuse investigation where a Veterinarian must conduct medical examinations of the animal. It is recommended to implement a fee of $55 per/hour, to cover the average staffing cost. Trap Fees: The Animal Center partners with residents to provide free spay and neuter services for feral and free roaming cats in our community. Humane traps can be rented for a deposit fee (returned to resident when the trap is returned). Staff recommend adding the deposit fee to the schedule to cover cost of purchasing new equipment when traps are not returned. COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT The California Government Code and Title 8 of the Municipal Code allows the City to recover costs associated with the abatement of hazards and enforcement actions related to matters of health and PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED FEE AMENDMENTS FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS DECEMBER 7, 2016 PAGE3 safety. The calculation and recovery of these costs can consume a great deal of time for Community Improvement Officers and the necessary office staff. This resolution sets standard and consistent fees for the recovery of costs incurred by the City when a property owner or resident has received due process, but the City must take action to actually remove a nuisance. These fees have previously not been assessed or required calculation for each event, resulting n an inconsistent assessment. The approval of these fees will allow the City to recover the administrative cost of services to provide maintenance for properties and are imposed only after all other efforts for voluntary compliance have failed. COMMUNITY SERVICES The following modifications are being proposed: MODIFIED FEES Staff is recommending the inclusion of a new fee for an additional position option for groups that are renting the Lewis Family Playhouse stage. The Theatre Technician II will be available at a lower hourly rate for rentals that do not require complicated or detailed technical support. In the 15/16 fiscal year we added a new category of rental time, Premium Hours, for the two large halls at Central Park. This category provided separate rental fees for the two halls on weekends and holidays. When this category was added it was advertised that clients that fell into Group 2 were not allowed to use these halls during Premium Hours unless they paid the higher Group 3 or 4 rate. Clients that fall into the Group 2 category include non-profit civic, athletic, social organizations, churches and public/private schools based n Rancho Cucamonga. We are amending this with the recommendation that Group 2 clients be charged a fee of approximately 20% higher than the Extended Hours fees. • Also implemented last fiscal year was the Central Park Wedding Ceremony Package. Due to actual usage and requests, the Bridal Suite portion of this package is being removed and the fee is being reduced accordingly. • There is an additional change to Equipment Use Fees of linens with the rental of each cocktail table. History shows that cocktail tables come with the request to rent linens. We are combining them to a single rental cost for efficiency. • The Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex has always charged a light fee of $300.00 per day for tournaments, though the Fee Schedule displayed "actual cost". Staff is recommending the Fee Schedule now display the actual charge of $300.00. • Adult Softball Tournament rentals at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sport Complex fields occur most weekends. Tournament Directors allow outside vendors to sell their products/food, etc. during the tournament time. When outside vendors are on site, staff is required to monitor the processes such as making sure all vendors have the appropriate paperwork completed, i.e., business license, insurance documents and Health permits. Staff is recommending a fee of $100.00 per tournament vendor charged to Tournament Directors that would offset that cost of staff time related to the vendors. Staff is recommending that the rental fees for the LoanMart Stadium and Field be restructured. Staff researched the rental fees for similar stadiums n our surrounding area to P70 PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED FEE AMENDMENTS FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS DECEMBER 7, 2016 PAGE4 compare our fee structure. Based on our research, we recommend structuring fees on a sliding scale to accommodate both large and small events. DELETED FEES Community Services is deleting various fees such as the Facility Decorating Discount due to the fact that the normal rental costs and rates apply during set up/decorating as well as the actual use of the rental space. The Mobile Lift is not available for rent and has no history of being requested therefore the fees are being deleted. The soccer fields at the Rancho Cucamonga Epicenter and Adult Sports Complex have been closed in anticipation of the building and opening of the Goals Soccer Complex. All references to Soccer Field rentals have been deleted from the Fee Schedule. Finally, the fees associated with the Epicenter Stadium Service Fees and Deposits are being deleted. Through our lease with Quakes Baseball, they have the first right of refusal for food and beverage. All rentals that have taken place at LoanMart Field have had food and beverage provided by the Quakes organization. PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Hillside Design Review is an entitlement for new residential projects within the hillside area of the City. The term "hillside" is defined as any parcel with an average slope of 8 percent or greater. Generally, land north of Banyan Street and Summit Avenue is considered hillside. Slopes exceeding 8 percent also occur in the Red Hill area and in the area south of Base Line Road, east of Vineyard. The current Hillside Design Review fees are applied to small developments of 14 dwelling units in the amount of $2,238. Larger hillside developments of 5 or more dwelling units are charged $3,468. Staff are proposing an increase in the fee for 5 or more dwelling units only. The current fee does not reflect the average estimated hours required to process this entitlement. By comparison, a Design Review for non -hillside properties is $11,187. The Design Review process takes the same amount of staff time for hillside properties as it does for non -hillside properties. Our goal with this fee update is to bring these two entitlements in congruence with each other by increasing the Hillside Design Review fee for 5 or more dwelling units to match the non -hillside Design Review fee of $11,187. The fee for 14 dwelling units is consistent with the corresponding entitlement for non -hillside properties (Minor Design Review) and is not proposed to change. The impact of this change will be minimal. Staff has conducted an analysis of all Hillside Design Review applications submitted from 2004 - 2016. A total of 78 Hillside Design Review applications submitted during this 12 year period; 76 applications were for 1 - 4 dwelling units and 2 applications were for 5 or more dwelling units. ENGINEERING SERVICES With the City assuming ownership of the streetlight infrastructure from Southern California Edison citywide in 2017, inspections of all new streetlight installations will now be the responsibility of the City, therefore a new plan check fee and inspection fee is required. This will include Plan Check P71 PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED FEE AMENDMENTS FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS DECEMBER 7, 2016 PAGES with an increased fee structure for large installations. The inspection of the actual installations will be billed in 10 pole increments. To address the most recent franchise agreement between the City and Burrtec Waste Industries, staff is requesting fees be approved for assessment when City staff hours are required to provide Notice of Illegal Bin and for any subsequent removal of an unauthorized bin when necessary. The current Transportation Development Impact Fees (DIF) have been reviewed and analyzed by City staff and found insufficient in regards to meeting future transportation needs due to increases in construction costs since the last fee update in June 2014. The Engineering News Record regional construction cost index experienced an increase of 3.8% from June 2014 to June 2016. When applied to the construction costs estimates included in the Transportation DIF program, this resulted in an overall increase in the program cost of 4.2%. In order to ensure that the program collects adequate fees to meet the City's future transportation needs, the Engineering Services Department is proposing an increase in the Transportation Development Impact Fees of 4.2%. The new Transportation Development Impact Fees will be effective February 1, 2017. POLICE DEPARTMENT Per our City Attorney, we are statutorily required to set fees which are not arbitrary and should be standardized within the same county. Therefore, staff of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department conducted a thorough review of our current fee schedule and a comparative analysis of the fee schedules for the surrounding Police Departments, including but not limited to: Chino and Chino Hills, Ontario, Upland, Montclair, Fontana, San Bernardino, and the County average. We also confirmed our fee schedule has not been assessed or modified since 2010. The contract for law enforcement services has increased 27% between 2010 and 2017, and the fee structure should be commensurate in order to lawfully recover costs associated with enforcing the violation(s). In addition the Government Code requires the collection of $12.50 per violation for the county general fund and state court funds. Late fees are also controlled, and must be standardized with respect to other fee schedules as well. The Vehicle Code requires an additional 10% assessment for late fees arising from violations related to disabled parking. The proposed fee schedule is legally defensible, but just as importantly, is reasonable for recovering costs incurred by enforcement activities. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT The 2016 California Fire Code, which the Fire Board recently approved, includes two new operating permits. The Fire District needs to establish fees for these permits. The proposed fees have been set in accordance with a previously conducted study which evaluated the costs incurred by the Fire District in providing inspection and permit services. Fire District staff have calculated the minimum number of staff -hours that will be necessary to provide the services associated with issuing operating permits for the use of carbon dioxide systems in beverage dispensing and mobile motor - fuel dispensing operations. Fire District staff are recommending that the Board waives the collection of these fees for the remainder of the 2016-17 fiscal year since the collection of the fees for other operating permits has been waived by the Board for the 2016-17 fiscal year. The need to collect the fees for the use of P72 PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED FEE AMENDMENTS FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS DECEMBER 7. 2016 PAGE 6 carbon dioxide systems in beverage dispensing and mobile motor -fuel dispensing operations will be evaluated annually in accordance with Fire District Resolution No. FD 13-032. EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEES Animal Services Department, Community Services Department, Police Department, and Community Improvement Division fees will be effective January 1, 2017. Planning fees will be effective 60 days from the adoption of the resolution, consistent with State Law, and the new Transportation Development Impact Fees will be effective February 1, 2017, PUBLIC NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, this item was advertised fifteen (15) days in advance as a public hearing (1/8 page ad) in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. Respectfully submitted, Michelle Keith Communit ervices Director Ojj'� 6/�-� Candyce urnett Planning irector W-'-� Veronica Fincher Animal Services Director Mike Costello Fire Chief Attachment: Resolution No. 16-199 Resolution No. 16-200 Exhibit A, Resolution No. FD 16-030 '17 J a ook ommunity Improvement Manager Jason Weld Director of Engineerin ervices/City Engineer D nielle Boldt , hief ofTolice .jr4. ISWsr+A,.*CA#LK.. B, C - Transportation Development Fees P73 RESOLUTION NO. 16-199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO ANIMAL SERVICES, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT, COMMUNITY SERVICES, ENGINEERING SERVICES, PLANNING, AND POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SERVICES. A. Recitals. 1. The California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. 2. Data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service, for which the fees and charges set forth herein apply, was made available to the public at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 3. On December 7, 2016, City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby specifically finds that the fees and charges set forth do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge be levied. SECTION 3: The City hereby amends Resolution 07-047 and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Animal Services Department: Services Fee Puppy Adoptions , includes vaccinations, microchip, and spay/neuter $ 150.00 Spa /Neuter Surgery - do - Returned to Owner $ 80.00 Spay/Neuter Surgery - cat - Returned to Owner $ 47.00 Spay/Neuter Surgery - dog - Public Clinic (Fees vary per program) Fees Vary Spay/Neuter Surgery - cat - Public Clinic (Fees vary per program) Fees Vary Shock/Trauma Emergent Care $ 275.00 Wound Care - Minor $ 85.00 Wound Care - Extensive $ 155.00 P74 Parvo Treatment - Per Day $ 105.00 Upper Respiratory Treatment - Per Da $ 50.00 Medication - Eye Medication $ 10.00 Medication - Antibiotic Tablets $ 15.00 Medication - Antibiotic Injection $ 20.00 Medication - Pain Medication $ 5.00 Medication - Ear Medication $ 10.00 Dead Animal Disposal inspection shows correction has not been completed Owner Request Cremation Services — Actual contractor cost to be added $ 5.00 Field Services Veterinary Investigations (time & reporting) - Per Hour $ 55.00 Trap Fees legal services costs to be added. Feral Cat Trap (Thru TNR program only, deposited if trap not returned) - Deposit $ 60.00 Feral Cat Box (Thru TNR program only, deposited if box not returned) - Deposit $ 80.00 SECTION 4: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Community Improvement Division: Title Description Cost Abatement - Emergency abatement of hazardous or nuisance $230.00 Emergency conditions, such as open & vacant properties, unsecure pools or stagnant water. Actual contractor and legal service costs will be added. Abatement — Re- Inspection costs to be assessed on follow-up $275.00 inspection fee when inspection after issuance of Notice to Abate and re - non -compliant inspection shows correction has not been completed or attempted and staff will assign a contractor to abate the hazard or nuisance. Actual contractor and legal services costs to be added. Abatement — Removal of inoperative vehicles from private property, $352.00 Vehicle with or without an abatement warrant. Fees for second and additional vehicles will be 50% of current administrative fee. Actual contractor and legal services costs to be added. Administrative Administrative Hearing for appeal of Notice to Abate, $220.00 Hearing Fee Administrative Citation or other administrative action. Fees to be deposited or Hardship Waiver filed prior to appeal period expiration. Fees shall be refunded when the appellant prevails, retained by the City when the citation or notice is upheld and may be modified by the hearing officer. Notice & Order Costs for the preparation of a Notice & Order. Fees $149.00 to be waived when compliance is achieved prior to the required correction date. Actual costs of property profile and mailing to all parties shall be added. P75 Title Description Cost Notice of Pendency Upon receiving satisfaction of a demand, this fee will $151.00 Release be charged for filing a Release of Abatement Lien or Victoria Gardens Cultural Center none Withdrawal of Notice of Pendency with the County $20.00 w/Kitchen Recorder. Actual County fees will be added. Warrant - Costs for the procurement, service and related $485.00 Procure/Process processing of inspection and/or abatement warrants. Event Hall w/Kitchen Actual costs for legal services shall be added. Additional costs to the City may be added when in excess of established fee by more than 10%. SECTION 5: The City hereby amends Resolutions 14-003, 16-004, and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Community Services Department: General Facility Use Fees City Staff Fees One staff person is included in the rental fees and additional staff may be required depending on the type of event, as determined by the Community Services Department. Fee Description Locations Current Fee New Fee Amount Wedding Ceremony Central Park Mesa Package Courtyard Theatre Technician 11 Victoria Gardens Cultural Center none $30.00/hr. General Facility Use Fees — Central Park Halls/Premium Hours (Group 2) Addition of Group 2 use of Premium Hour category for rentals of Rancho Cucamonga Hall and David Dreier Hall at Central Park Community Center. Premium Hour category definition: All hours on Saturdays and designated Holidays Fee Description Locations Current Fee New Fee Amount Wedding Ceremony Central Park Mesa Package Courtyard Premium Hour Rental David Dreier Event Hall Use not allowed $85.00/hr. $20.00 w/Kitchen Rancho Cucamonga Use not allowed $125.00/hr. Event Hall w/Kitchen Central Park Wedding Ceremony Package (Groups 2 — 4) Removed use of bridal suite from package Fee Description Location Current Fee New Fee Amount New Fee Amount Wedding Ceremony Central Park Mesa Package Courtyard $620.00 $500.00 Equipment Use Fee — Community Facilities (Groups 2 — 4) Fee Description Location Current Fee New Fee Amount Cocktail Table with Linen Victoria Gardens Cultural Center $12.00 $20.00 Epicenter Community Sport Fields Rental Fees (Groups 1 — 4) Defined dollar amount of actual cost of light fee usage per day. Addition of new vendor fee. Fee Description Location Current Fee New Fee Amount Fee 2 Fee 3 Light Fee Epicenter Sports Fields Actual Cost $300.00 per day Tournament Vendor Epicenter Sports Fields Fee none $100.00 per vendor Epicenter Stadium (LoanMart) Complex Facility Rental Fees (Groups 1 — 4) Restructured fees for rental of Stadium/LoanMart Field Fee 1: 500 or less event attendees Fee 2: 501-1,999 event attendees Fee 3: 2,000+ event attendees Applicants group determination may be determined by City Staff based on planned activities and City's liability exposure Stadium Rental Fee 1 Fee 2 Fee 3 Includes cafe areas $1,500/day $2,500/day $4,000/day Sky Box Rental Use only available with Stadium Rental $50.00/ hr $50.00/hr $50.00/ hr Pavilion 3rd base $75.00/hr $75.00/hr $75.00/hr Plaza 1St base $85.00/hr $85.00/hr $85.00/hr Epicenter Parking Area Rental Fees Parking Lot With Stadium Rental Without Stadium Rental Lot A $300.00/day $700.00/day Lot B $300.00/da $700.00/da Lot C $300.00/da $700.00/da Lot D $200.00/da $500.00/da Lot G (front only) $300.00/day $700.00/day Epicenter Special Event Area Site General User Group Classification 1-3 General User Group Classification 4 Epicenter Special Event Area $100.00/hour $100.00/hour SECTION 6: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Engineering Services Department: Title Description Cost Street Light Provide cost recovery for administrative/inspection $53.00 Inspection staff time for new street light poles. New inspection rate is good from 1-10 poles. Poles will be billed in increments of 10. Street Light Plan Provide cost recovery for administrative staff time and $715.00 Check for Electrical Engineering Consultant for street light pole plan check. P77 Title Description Cost Street Light Plan Street light plan check to provide for cost recovery for $284.00 Check — Additional Electrical Engineering Consultant to review additional Development Pages pages. 58.00 Illegal Bin Removal Provide cost recovery to Environmental Programs for $110.00 Notice Fee administrative staff time to process and post 24-hour Parking within 20' of Traffic Control Device 53.00 Notice to Remove for Illegal Bin. R.C.M.C. 10.44.040 Illegal Bin Removal Provide cost recovery to Environmental Programs for $43.00 Administrative Fee administrative staff time and costs related to the 53.00 58.00 removal of illegal hauler bin. Vending from a Vehicle SECTION 7: The City hereby amends Resolution 12-196 and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Planning Department, including a technology fee of 5%: Title Description Current Fee New Fee Hillside To reflect hours required to process and $3,468 $11,187.00 Development provide necessary consistency with Design 53.00 58.00 Review(>5 Review application for non -hillside projects. 53.00 58.00 dwelling units Parking within 20' of Traffic Control Device 53.00 58.00 The fee set forth in this section shall be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2017, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12 month period ending on December 31st of the immediately preceding year, as released by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 8: The City hereby amends Resolution 10-165 and adopts the following fees for parking citations issued by or as authorized by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department: Section Description Current Bail Proposed Bail R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(A) Parking on Divisional Island $ 53.00 $ 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(D) Prohibited Parking — Red Curb/Sign 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(E) No Parking in Parkway 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(H) Parking within 20' of Traffic Control Device 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.040 Obstructing an Alley 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.050(8) Repair/Wash Vehicle on Street 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.110 Vending from a Vehicle 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.130 72 Hour Parking 53.00 175.00 R.C.M.C. 10.48.010(B) Yellow Curb Parking 53.00 160.00 R.C.M.C. 10.48.010(C) White Curb Parking 53.00 75.00 R.C.M.C. 10.50.130 Permit Parking 53.00 75.00 Section Description Current Bail Proposed Bail R.C.M.C. 10.52.050(A) Res. Over -weight Exceed 5 Tons 203.00 208.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.050(C) Over -weight, Exceed 3 ton or 80 in 153.00 208.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.060(A) Parking Un -attached Trailer on Street 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.070(A) Parking on Private Property 63.00 100.00 R.C.M.C. 10.54.020(A/B) Parking Elect Vehicle not plugged in or excess 4 Hours 53.00 100.00 R.C.M.C. 10.64.030 Parking RV on Street 2 A.M. - 6 A.M. 63.00 70.00 R.C.M.C. 12.04.010(F) Parking in the Park 10 P.M. - 6 A.M. 53.00 110.00 C.V.C. 5200(A) No Front Plate 53.00 130.00 C.V.C. 5204(A) Current Tags Not Displayed 53.00 58.00 C.V.C. 21113(A) Unauthorized School Parking 43.00 58.00 C.V.C. 22500.1 Fire Lane 78.00 78.00 C.V.C. 22500(8) Parking Blocking Crosswalk 110.00 C.V.C. 22500(D) Parking within 15' Fire Station Driveway 110.00 C.V.C. 22500(E) Blocking a Driveway 53.00 58.00 C.V.C. 22500(F) Blocking a Sidewalk 53.00 160.00 C.V.C. 22502(A) Unlawful Curb Parking 53.00 60.00 C.V.C. 22507(A/B) Handicap Stall / Blocking 303.00 260.00 C.V.C. 22515(H) Parking Setting Brake / Stopping Engine 53.00 58.00 C.V.C. 22516 Parking with Person locked inside unable to escape 350.00 C.V.C. 22522 Parking within 3' of sidewalk ramp 260.00 Late Fee - 30 days from date of issue 35.00 SECTION 9: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by all City Departments: Title Description Cost Lien Administration Upon completing all research and determining an $65.00 assessment shall be necessary to recover costs, this fee shall be added to the previously determined costs. P79 Title Description Cost Lien Release Fees to be assessed when fees are paid to the City $72.00 after Council Resolution has been approved for tax lien. SECTION 10: The fees set forth in this Resolution shall take effect January 1, 2017 excluding Planning fees which will be effective 60 days from the adoption of the resolution, consistent with State Law, and Transportation Development Impact Fee will be effective February 1, 2017. SECTION 11: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. MORANDUM ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: December 5, 2016 C;UCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City EngineerG'� By: Tiffany Cooper, Management Analyst II Subject: Correction Item R2 — Page 79 & 82 — City Council Agenda — December 7, 2016 Attached are the revised Resolutions 16-199 and 16-200 which has one minor correction on each. • Item R2, page 79, Resolution No. 16-199, Section 10, the "and Transportation Development Impact Fee will be effective February 1, 2017." language has been removed; and; • Item R2, page 82, Resolution No. 16-200, "1310. Effective Date: was changed from February 1, 2017 to March 1, 2017." RESOLUTION NO. 16-199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO ANIMAL SERVICES, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT, COMMUNITY SERVICES, ENGINEERING, PLANNING, AND POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SERVICES. A. Recitals. 1. The California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. 2. Data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service, for which the fees and charges set forth herein apply, was made available to the public at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 3. On December 7, 2016, City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby specifically finds that the fees and charges set forth do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge be levied. SECTION 3: The City hereby amends Resolution 07-047 and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Animal Services Department: Services Fee Puppy Adoptions , includes vaccinations, microchip, and spay/neuter $ 150.00 Spay/Neuter Sur e - do - Returned to Owner $ 80.00 Spa /Neuter Surgery - cat - Returned to Owner $ 47.00 Spay/Neuter Sur e - do - Public Clinic Fees vary per program) Fees Vary Spa /Neuter Surgery - cat - Public Clinic Fees vary per program) Fees Vary Shock/Trauma Emergent Care $ 275.00 Wound Care - Minor $ 85.00 Wound Care - Extensive $ 155.00 Parvo Treatment - Per Da $ 105.00 Upper Respiratory Treatment - Per Da $ 50.00 Medication - Eye Medication $ 10.00 Medication - Antibiotic Tablets $ 15.00 Medication -Antibiotic Injection $ 20.00 Medication - Pain Medication $ 5.00 Medication - Ear Medication $ 10.00 Dead Animal Disposal inspection shows correction has not been completed Owner Request Cremation Services — Actual contractor cost to be added $ 5.00 Field Services abate the hazard or nuisance. Actual contractor and Veterinary Investigations time & reporting) - Per Hour $ 55.00 Trap Fees Removal of inoperative vehicles from private property, $352.00 Feral Cat Trap (Thru TNR program only, deposited if trap not returned) - Depos it $ 60.00 Feral Cat Box (Thru TNR program only, deposited if box not returned) - Deposit $ 80.00 SECTION 4: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Community Improvement Division: Title Description Cost Abatement - Emergency abatement of hazardous or nuisance $230.00 Emergency conditions, such as open & vacant properties, unsecure pools or stagnant water. Actual contractor and legal service costs will be added. Abatement — Re- Inspection costs to be assessed on follow-up $275.00 inspection fee when inspection after issuance of Notice to Abate and re - non -compliant inspection shows correction has not been completed or attempted and staff will assign a contractor to abate the hazard or nuisance. Actual contractor and legal services costs to be added. Abatement — Removal of inoperative vehicles from private property, $352.00 Vehicle with or without an abatement warrant. Fees for second and additional vehicles will be 50% of current administrative fee. Actual contractor and legal services costs to be added. Administrative Administrative Hearing for appeal of Notice to Abate, $220.00 Hearing Fee Administrative Citation or other administrative action. Fees to be deposited or Hardship Waiver filed prior to appeal period expiration. Fees shall be refunded when the appellant prevails, retained by the City when the citation or notice is upheld and may be modified b the hearing officer. Notice & Order Costs for the preparation of a Notice & Order. Fees $149.00 to be waived when compliance is achieved prior to the required correction date. Actual costs of property profile and mailing to all parties shall be added. Title Description Cost Notice of Pendency Upon receiving satisfaction of a demand, this fee will $151.00 Release be charged for filing a Release of Abatement Lien or Victoria Gardens Cultural Center none Withdrawal of Notice of Pendency with the County w/Kitchen Recorder. Actual County fees will be added. Warrant - Costs for the procurement, service and related $485.00 Procure/Process processing of inspection and/or abatement warrants. Event Hall w/Kitchen Use not allowed Actual costs for legal services shall be added. Additional costs to the City may be added when in excess of established fee by more than 10%. SECTION 5: The City hereby amends Resolutions 14-003, 16-004, and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Community Services Department: General Facility Use Fees City Staff Fees One staff person is included in the rental fees and additional staff may be required depending on the type of event, as determined by the Community Services Department. Fee Description Locations Current Fee New Fee Amount Wedding Ceremony Central Park Mesa $620.00 Package Courtyard $500.00 Theatre Technician II Victoria Gardens Cultural Center none $30.00/hr. General Facility Use Fees — Central Park Halls/Premium Hours (Group 2) Addition of Group 2 use of Premium Hour category for rentals of Rancho Cucamonga Hall and David Dreier Hall at Central Park Community Center. Premium Hour category definition: All hours on Saturdays and designated Holidays Fee Description Locations Current Fee New Fee Amount Wedding Ceremony Central Park Mesa $620.00 Package Courtyard $500.00 Premium Hour Rental David Dreier Event Hall Use not allowed $85.00/hr. w/Kitchen Rancho Cucamonga Event Hall w/Kitchen Use not allowed $125.00/hr. Central Park Wedding Ceremony Package (Groups 2 — 4) Removed use of bridal suite from packaae Fee Description Location Current Fee New Fee Amount Wedding Ceremony Central Park Mesa $620.00 Package Courtyard $500.00 Equipment Use Fee — Community Facilities (Groups 2 — 41 Fee Description Location Current Fee New Fee Amount Cocktail Table with Victoria Gardens Cultural $12.00 Linen Center $20.00 Epicenter Community Sport Fields Rental Fees (Groups 1 - 4) Defined dollar amount of actual cost of light fee usage per dav. Addition of new vendor fee Fee Description Location Current Fee New Fee Amount Fee 2 Fee 3 Light Fee Epicenter Sports Fields Actual Cost $300.00 per day Tournament Vendor Epicenter Sports Fields none Fee $100.00 per vendor Epicenter Stadium (LoanMart) Complex Facility Rental Fees (Groups 1 - 4) Restructured fees for rental of Stadium/LoanMart Field Fee 1: 500 or less event attendees Fee 2: 501-1,999 event attendees Fee 3: 2,000+ event attendees Applicants group determination may be determined by City Staff based on planned activities and City's liability ex osure Stadium Rental Fee 1 Fee 2 Fee 3 Includes cafe areas $1,500/da $2,500/da $4,000/da Sky Box Rental Use only available with Stadium Rental $50.00/ hr $50.00/hr $50.00/ hr Pavilion 3rd base $75.00/hr $75.00/hr $75.00/hr Plaza 1 It base $85.00/hr $85.00/hr $85.00/hr Epicenter Parking Area Rental Fees Parking Lot With Stadium Rental Without Stadium Rental Lot A $300.00/da $700.00/da Lot B $300.00/da $700.00/da Lot C $300.00/da $700.00/da Lot D $200.00/da $500.00/da Lot G (front only) $300.00/day $700.00/day Epicenter Special Event Area Site General User Group Classification 1-3 General User Group Classification 4 Epicenter Special Event Area $100.00/hour $100.00/hour SECTION 6: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Engineering Services Department: Title Description Cost Street Light Provide cost recovery for administrative/inspection $53.00 Inspection staff time for new street light poles. New inspection rate is good from 1-10 poles. Poles will be billed in increments of 10. Street Light Plan Provide cost recovery for administrative staff time and $715.00 Check for Electrical Engineering Consultant for street light ole plan check. Title Description Cost Street Light Plan Street light plan check to provide for cost recovery for $284.00 Check — Additional Electrical Engineering Consultant to review additional Development Pages pages. 58.00 Illegal Bin Removal Provide cost recovery to Environmental Programs for $110.00 Notice Fee administrative staff time to process and post 24-hour Parking within 20' of Traffic Control Device 53.00 Notice to Remove for Illegal Bin. R.C.M.C. 10.44.040 Illegal Bin Removal Provide cost recovery to Environmental Programs for $43.00 Administrative Fee administrative staff time and costs related to the 53.00 58.00 removal of illegal hauler bin. Vending from a Vehicle SECTION 7: The City hereby amends Resolution 12-196 and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Planning Department, including a technology fee of 5%: Title Description Current Fee New Fee Hillside To reflect hours required to process and $3,468 $11,187.00 Development provide necessary consistency with Design 53.00 58.00 Review(>5 Review application for non -hillside projects. 53.00 58.00 dwelling units Parking within 20' of Traffic Control Device 53.00 58.00 The fee set forth in this section shall be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2017, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12 month period ending on December 31st of the immediately preceding year, as released by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 8: The City hereby amends Resolution 10-165 and adopts the following fees for parking citations issued by or as authorized by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department: Section Description Current Bail Proposed Bail R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(A) Parking on Divisional Island $ 53.00 $ 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(D) Prohibited Parking — Red Curb/Sign 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(E) No Parking in Parkway 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(H) Parking within 20' of Traffic Control Device 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.040 Obstructing an Alley 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.050(8) Repair/Wash Vehicle on Street 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.110 Vending from a Vehicle 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.130 72 Hour Parking 53.00 175.00 R.C.M.C. 10.48.010(B) Yellow Curb Parking 53.00 160.00 R.C.M.C. 10.48.010(C) White Curb Parking 53.00 75.00 R. C.M.C. 10.50.130 Permit Parking 53.00 75.00 Section Description Current Bail ProposedBail R.C.M.C. 10.52.050(A) Res. Over -weight Exceed 5 Tons 203.00 208.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.050(C) Over -weight, Exceed 3 ton or 80 in 153.00 208.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.060(A) Parking Un -attached Trailer on Street 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.070(A) Parking on Private Property 63.00 100.00 R.C.M.C. 10.54.020(A/B) Parking Elect Vehicle not plugged in or excess 4 Hours 53.00 100.00 R.C.M.C. 10.64.030 Parking RV on Street 2 A.M. - 6 A.M. 63.00 70.00 R.C.M.C. 12.04.010(F) Parking in the Park 10 P.M. --6 A.M. 53.00 110.00 C.V.C. 5200(A) No Front Plate 53.00 130.00 C.V.C. 5204(A) Current Tags Not Displayed 53.00 58.00 C.V.C. 21113(A) Unauthorized School Parking 43.00 58.00 C.V.C. 22500.1 Fire Lane 78.00 78.00 C.V.C. 22500(B) Parking Blocking Crosswalk 110.00 C.V.C. 22500(D) Parking within 15' Fire Station Driveway 110.00 C.V.C. 22500(E) Blocking a Driveway 53.00 58.00 C.V.C. 22500(F) Blocking a Sidewalk 53.00 160.00 C.V.C. 22502(A) Unlawful Curb Parking 53.00 60.00 C.V.C. 22507(A/B) Handicap Stall / Blocking 303.00 260.00 C.V.C. 22515(H) Parking Setting Brake / Stopping Engine 53.00 58.00 C.V.C. 22516 Parking with Person locked inside unable to escape 350.00 C.V.C. 22522 Parking within 3' of sidewalk ramp 260.00 Late Fee - 30 days from date of issue 35.00 SECTION 9: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by all City Departments: Title Description Cost Lien Administration Upon completing all research and determining an $65.00 assessment shall be necessary to recover costs, this fee shall be added to the previously determined costs. Title Description Cost Lien Release Fees to be assessed when fees are paid to the City $72.00 after Council Resolution has been approved for tax lien. SECTION 10: The fees set forth in this Resolution shall take effect January 1, 2017 excluding Planning fees which will be effective 60 days from the adoption of the resolution, consistent with State Law. and TFanspeFtation D „ opment—In;paGt Fee will be eff,eG+e Februa '','2017. SECTION 11: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 16-200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 14-102, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS: 1. In April 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 in April, 1991 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees. 2. On June 4, 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 14-102, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. 3. The Development Mitigation Program approved by the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) requires that project costs and fees, including transportation development fees, be updated biennially. 4. The Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued need for the described capital improvements, and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate. 5. On December 7, 2016, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision herein were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing. 6. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds as follows: a. The purpose of the fee revision herein is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and b. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; and C. The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and d. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and e. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit "B", and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and f. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. 3. Definitions: a. "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development project" includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. b. "Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. C. "Equivalent dwelling unit" or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing unit is equal to one EDU. 4. Payment of Fee: The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any building permit or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first; unless otherwise pre-empted by State regulations. The City Engineer shall determine the amount of the fee based upon the size and type of development. 5. Fee Schedule: The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $9,382 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C". 6. EDU / Land Use Equivalent Schedule: The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential — Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium — Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel — Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care — Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage — Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station — Per Pump 5.0 EDU 7. Use of Fee: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". 8. Administration Fee: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 9. Fee Review: The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing, and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 10. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees as herein adopted, described, and amended shall not be collected by the City until March 1, 2017. 11. Judicial Challenge: Any judicial action proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. 12. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. EXHIBIT "A" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM PROJECTS & PROJECT COSTS Freeway Interchanges Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings Project Estimate F1 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $352,920 F2 Foothill Boulevard at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $1,146,990 F3 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $21,279,000 F4 Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange $42,661,800 F5 Grove Avenue / 4th Street at 1-10 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $4,671,000 Total: $70,111,710 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings Bridges Project Estimate R1 Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $11,251,920 R2 6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 R3 6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 R4 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 Total: $13,992,240 Bridges Streets Project Estimate B1 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $2,127,900 B2 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $1,008,936 B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch - Widen Existing Bridge $990,252 B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,127,268 B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $6,438,714 B6 Whitram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $1,241,448 B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $1,277,778 B8 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $2,151,774 Total: $16,364,070 Streets Project Estimate LS2 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $691,308 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,398,186 Streets:: Project Estimate S3 Arrow Route - 500' E/O 1-15 Freeway to 1,300' E/O 1-15 Freeway - Widen South Side $1,160,484 S4 Banyan Street - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen North Side $1,024,506 S5 Banyan Street - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New Alignment $8,448,282 S6 Base Line Road - Etiwanda Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen North Side 2 to 3 Lanes $1,020,354 S7 Cherry Avenue - Wilson Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen West Side $1,236,258 S8 Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,324,488 S9 East Avenue - 1-15 to Victoria Street - Various Bottlenecks $847,008 S10 East Avenue - Fire Station to Wilson - New $1,344,210 S11 East Avenue - Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way - New $454,644 S12 Etiwanda Avenue - 6th Street to Arrow Route - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $4,281,750 S13 Etiwanda Avenue - Miller Avenue to 850' N/O Miller Avenue - Widen East Side $292,716 S14 Etiwanda Avenue - Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue - Curb and Gutter East Side Only $964,302 S15 Etiwanda Avenue - Existing Northern Terminus to North Rim Way - New $544,950 S16 Foothill Boulevard - Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $1,249,752 S17 Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue to 700' E/O Hellman Avenue - Widen North Side Only $2,003,340 S18 Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue - Widen Intersection $7,520,310 S19 Foothill Boulevard - Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $2,033,442 S20 Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Tapia Via - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $1,114,812 S21 Grove Avenue - San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $686,118 S22 Haven Avenue - Base Line Road to 1-210 Freeway - Widen West Side Only $12,806,844 S23 Lower Crest Road - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - New $1,667,028 S24 Miller Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $2,518,188 S25 Milliken Avenue - 5th Street to 700' S/O 5th Street - Widen West Side Only $316,590 S26 Victoria Street - East Property Line of Etiwanda High School to 1-15 Freeway - Improve Both Shoulders $305,172 S27 Vintage Drive - Etiwanda Avenue to 1,300' W/O Etiwanda Avenue - New $892,680 S28 Wilson Avenue - Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard - New $7,083,312 S29 Wilson Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Backbone Only $586,470 S30 Wilson Avenue - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $6,228,000 S31 Youngs Canyon - Cherry Avenue to Wardman Bullock - New $9,757,200 Total: $81,802,704 Tra;c'Signals li Project Estimate T1 4th Street at Richmond Place $363,300 T2 4th Street at Utica Avenue $363,300 T3 6th Street at Buffalo Avenue $363,300 T4 6th Street at Cleveland Avenue $363,300 T5 6th Street at Etiwanda Avenue $363,300 T6 6th Street at Hellman Avenue $363,300 T7 6th Street at Pittsburgh Avenue $363,300 T8 6th Street at Rochester Avenue $363,300 T9 6th Street at Santa Anita Avenue $363,300 T10 6th Street at Utica Avenue $363,300 T11 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street $363,300 T12 Archibald Avenue at San Bernardino Road $363,300 T13 Archibald Avenue at Victoria Street $363,300 T14 Archibald Avenue at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T15 Arrow Route at Center Avenue $363,300 T16 Banyan Street at Rochester Avenue $363,300 T17 Banyan Street at Wardman Bullock Road $363,300 T18 Base Line Road at San Carmela Court $363,300 T19 Base Line Road at Shelby Place $363,300 T20 Carnelian Street at Banyan Street $363,300 T21 Carnelian Street at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T22 Cherry Avenue at Youngs Canyon Road $363,300 T23 Church Street at Elm Avenue $363,300 T24 Church Street at Mayten Avenue $363,300 T25 Church Street at Ramona Avenue $363,300 T26 Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway $363,300 T27 Civic Center Drive at Red Oak Street $363,300 T28 Ridgeline Place at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T29 Day Creek Boulevard at Madrigal Place $363,300 T30 Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T31 East Avenue at Miller Avenue $363,300 T32 East Avenue at Highland Avenue $363,300 T33 Etiwanda Avenue at Garcia Drive $363,300 T34 Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue $363,300 Trak Signa/s Project Estimate T35 Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Court $363,300 T36 Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue $363,300 T37 Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue $363,300 T38 Haven Avenue at Trademark Street $363,300 T39 Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue $363,300 T40 Haven Avenue at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T41 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street $363,300 T42 Hermosa Avenue at Church Street $363,300 T43 Milliken Avenue at 5th Street $363,300 T44 Milliken Avenue at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T45 Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard $363,300 T46 Spruce Avenue at Elm Avenue $363,300 T47 Spruce Avenue at Mountain View Drive $363,300 T48 Spruce Avenue at Red Oak Street $363,300 T49 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue $363,300 T50 Terra Vista Parkway at Town Center Drive $363,300 T51 Town Center Drive at Elm Avenue $363,300 T52 Wilson Avenue at East Avenue $363,300 T53 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue $363,300 T54 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue (West) $363,300 T55 Wilson Avenue at San Sevaine Road $363,300 T56 Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road $363,300 T57 Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue $363,300 T58 4th Street at Golden Lock Road - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T59 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T60 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $51,900 T61 Arrow Route at Red Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T62 Arrow Route at White Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T63 Banyan Street at East Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T64 Base Line Road at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T65 Base Line Road at Spruce Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T66 Base Line Road at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T67 Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T68 Day Creek Boulevard at Sugar Gum Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T69 Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 Traffic Signals Signal Interconnect System Project Estimate T70 Milliken Avenue at Millenium Court - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T71 Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T72 Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T73 Milliken Avenue at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T74 Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 Total: $20,344,800 Signal Interconnect System Program Totals Category Project Estimate S11 Signal Interconnect System $7,992,600 Total: $7,992,600 Program Totals Category Estimate Freeway Interchanges $70,111,710 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings $13,992,240 Bridges $16,364,070 Streets $81,802,704 Traffic Signals $20,344,800 Signal Interconnect Systems $7,992,600 Total: $210,608,124 DIF Program Cost Item Estimate Program Total $210,608,124 Less Fund Balance as of 2005 -$20,000,000 Sub -Total $190,608,124 Administration Fee (15%) $28,591,219 Total: $219,199,343 EXHIBIT "B" TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES Land Use Type Fee Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $9,382 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit $5,629 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit $5,629 Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) - Per Bedroom $1,876 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed $1,876 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $14,073 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet $11,258 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $5,629 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet $4,691 Hotel / Motel - Per Room $7,506 Day Care - Per Student $2,346 Self -Storage - Per Unit $188 Service Station - Per Pump $46,910 EXHIBIT "C" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM CALCULATIONS 1/acant Lana)as,°of February 2005 Vacant Residential Property = 950 acres Single Family Dwelling Units (SFDU) = 5,363 units Multi -Family Dwelling Units (MFDU) = 5,248 units Vacant Industrial Property = 719 acres = 31,319,640 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5, then the future square footage of industrial development is 31,319,640 square feet x 0.5 = 15,659,820 square feet. Vacant Commercial Property = 334 acres = 14,549,040 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future square footage of commercial development is 14,549,040 square feet x 0.25 = 3,637,260 square feet. Egu��alent, Dwelling Units (EDU) per Land.Use ,. ; Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to be tabulated for each type of land use, the "Equivalent Dwelling Units" or EDU for each type of land use must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type's EDU is based on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Per City Resolution No. 91-092, the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential — Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium — Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel — Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care — Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage — Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station — Per Pump 5.0 EDU Total Future Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) Calculate Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) Item Vacant Land EDU by Future Land Use as of February 2005 Land Equivalent $5,629 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit Use Dwelling Units Single -Family Dwelling Unit 5,363 Units 1.00 5,363 Multi -Family Dwelling Unit 5,248 Units 0.60 3,149 Industrial Park (per 1,000 SF) 15,659,820 Square Feet 0.60 9,396 Commercial (per 1,000 SF) 3,637,260 Square Feet 1.50 5,455 Total Future EDU 23,363 Calculate Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) Item Fees Total Cost of Projects $219,199,343 Total Future EDU (as of February 2005) 23,363 Cost per EDU $9,382 Calculate Transportation Development Fees by Land Use Item EDU by Land Use Fees Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 $9,382 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 $5,629 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 $5,629 Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) - Per Bedroom 0.2 $1,876 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 $1,876 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 $14,073 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 $11,258 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 $5,629 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 $4,691 Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 $7,506 Day Care - Per Student 0.25 $2,346 Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 $188 Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 $46,910 MR RESOLUTION NO. 16-200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 14-102, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS: 1. In April 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 in April, 1991 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees. 2. On June 4, 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 14-102, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. 3. The Development Mitigation Program approved by the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) requires that project costs and fees, including transportation development fees, be updated biennially. 4. The Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued need for the described capital improvements, and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate. 5. On December 7, 2016, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision herein were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing. 6. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds as follows: a. The purpose of the fee revision herein is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and b. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; and WI C. The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and d. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and e. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit "B", and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and f. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. 3. Definitions: a. "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development project" includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. b. "Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. C. "Equivalent dwelling unit" or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing unit is equal to one EDU. 4. Payment of Fee: The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any building permit or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first; unless otherwise pre-empted by State regulations. The City Engineer shall determine the amount of the fee based upon the size and type of development. 5. Fee Schedule: The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $9,382 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C". 6. EDU / Land Use Equivalent Schedule: The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential — Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium — Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 EDU ':i Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel — Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care — Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage — Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station — Per Pump 5.0 EDU 7. Use of Fee: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". 8. Administration Fee: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 9. Fee Review: The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing, and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 10. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees as herein adopted, described, and amended shall not be collected by the City until February 1, 2017. 11. Judicial Challenge: Any judicial action proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. 12. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 16-199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN UPDATED FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO ANIMAL SERVICES, COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT, COMMUNITY SERVICES, ENGINEERING, PLANNING, AND POLICE DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SERVICES. A. Recitals. 1. The California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. 2. Data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service, for which the fees and charges set forth herein apply, was made available to the public at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 3. On December 7, 2016, City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby specifically finds that the fees and charges set forth do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge be levied. SECTION 3: The City hereby amends Resolution 07-047 and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Animal Services Department: Services Fee Puppy Adoptions , includes vaccinations, microchip, and spay/neuter $ 150.00 Spay/Neuter Sur e - do - Returned to Owner $ 80.00 Spa /Neuter Surgery - cat - Returned to Owner $ 47.00 Spay/Neuter Sur e - do - Public Clinic Fees vary per program) Fees Vary Spa /Neuter Surgery - cat - Public Clinic Fees vary per program) Fees Vary Shock/Trauma Emergent Care $ 275.00 Wound Care - Minor $ 85.00 Wound Care - Extensive $ 155.00 Parvo Treatment - Per Da $ 105.00 Upper Respiratory Treatment - Per Da $ 50.00 Medication - Eye Medication $ 10.00 Medication - Antibiotic Tablets $ 15.00 Medication -Antibiotic Injection $ 20.00 Medication - Pain Medication $ 5.00 Medication - Ear Medication $ 10.00 Dead Animal Disposal inspection shows correction has not been completed Owner Request Cremation Services — Actual contractor cost to be added $ 5.00 Field Services abate the hazard or nuisance. Actual contractor and Veterinary Investigations time & reporting) - Per Hour $ 55.00 Trap Fees Removal of inoperative vehicles from private property, $352.00 Feral Cat Trap (Thru TNR program only, deposited if trap not returned) - Depos it $ 60.00 Feral Cat Box (Thru TNR program only, deposited if box not returned) - Deposit $ 80.00 SECTION 4: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Community Improvement Division: Title Description Cost Abatement - Emergency abatement of hazardous or nuisance $230.00 Emergency conditions, such as open & vacant properties, unsecure pools or stagnant water. Actual contractor and legal service costs will be added. Abatement — Re- Inspection costs to be assessed on follow-up $275.00 inspection fee when inspection after issuance of Notice to Abate and re - non -compliant inspection shows correction has not been completed or attempted and staff will assign a contractor to abate the hazard or nuisance. Actual contractor and legal services costs to be added. Abatement — Removal of inoperative vehicles from private property, $352.00 Vehicle with or without an abatement warrant. Fees for second and additional vehicles will be 50% of current administrative fee. Actual contractor and legal services costs to be added. Administrative Administrative Hearing for appeal of Notice to Abate, $220.00 Hearing Fee Administrative Citation or other administrative action. Fees to be deposited or Hardship Waiver filed prior to appeal period expiration. Fees shall be refunded when the appellant prevails, retained by the City when the citation or notice is upheld and may be modified b the hearing officer. Notice & Order Costs for the preparation of a Notice & Order. Fees $149.00 to be waived when compliance is achieved prior to the required correction date. Actual costs of property profile and mailing to all parties shall be added. Title Description Cost Notice of Pendency Upon receiving satisfaction of a demand, this fee will $151.00 Release be charged for filing a Release of Abatement Lien or Victoria Gardens Cultural Center none Withdrawal of Notice of Pendency with the County w/Kitchen Recorder. Actual County fees will be added. Warrant - Costs for the procurement, service and related $485.00 Procure/Process processing of inspection and/or abatement warrants. Event Hall w/Kitchen Use not allowed Actual costs for legal services shall be added. Additional costs to the City may be added when in excess of established fee by more than 10%. SECTION 5: The City hereby amends Resolutions 14-003, 16-004, and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Community Services Department: General Facility Use Fees City Staff Fees One staff person is included in the rental fees and additional staff may be required depending on the type of event, as determined by the Community Services Department. Fee Description Locations Current Fee New Fee Amount Wedding Ceremony Central Park Mesa $620.00 Package Courtyard $500.00 Theatre Technician II Victoria Gardens Cultural Center none $30.00/hr. General Facility Use Fees — Central Park Halls/Premium Hours (Group 2) Addition of Group 2 use of Premium Hour category for rentals of Rancho Cucamonga Hall and David Dreier Hall at Central Park Community Center. Premium Hour category definition: All hours on Saturdays and designated Holidays Fee Description Locations Current Fee New Fee Amount Wedding Ceremony Central Park Mesa $620.00 Package Courtyard $500.00 Premium Hour Rental David Dreier Event Hall Use not allowed $85.00/hr. w/Kitchen Rancho Cucamonga Event Hall w/Kitchen Use not allowed $125.00/hr. Central Park Wedding Ceremony Package (Groups 2 — 4) Removed use of bridal suite from packaae Fee Description Location Current Fee New Fee Amount Wedding Ceremony Central Park Mesa $620.00 Package Courtyard $500.00 Equipment Use Fee — Community Facilities (Groups 2 — 41 Fee Description Location Current Fee New Fee Amount Cocktail Table with Victoria Gardens Cultural $12.00 Linen Center $20.00 Epicenter Community Sport Fields Rental Fees (Groups 1 - 4) Defined dollar amount of actual cost of light fee usage per dav. Addition of new vendor fee Fee Description Location Current Fee New Fee Amount Fee 2 Fee 3 Light Fee Epicenter Sports Fields Actual Cost $300.00 per day Tournament Vendor Epicenter Sports Fields none Fee $100.00 per vendor Epicenter Stadium (LoanMart) Complex Facility Rental Fees (Groups 1 - 4) Restructured fees for rental of Stadium/LoanMart Field Fee 1: 500 or less event attendees Fee 2: 501-1,999 event attendees Fee 3: 2,000+ event attendees Applicants group determination may be determined by City Staff based on planned activities and City's liability ex osure Stadium Rental Fee 1 Fee 2 Fee 3 Includes cafe areas $1,500/da $2,500/da $4,000/da Sky Box Rental Use only available with Stadium Rental $50.00/ hr $50.00/hr $50.00/ hr Pavilion 3rd base $75.00/hr $75.00/hr $75.00/hr Plaza 1 It base $85.00/hr $85.00/hr $85.00/hr Epicenter Parking Area Rental Fees Parking Lot With Stadium Rental Without Stadium Rental Lot A $300.00/da $700.00/da Lot B $300.00/da $700.00/da Lot C $300.00/da $700.00/da Lot D $200.00/da $500.00/da Lot G (front only) $300.00/day $700.00/day Epicenter Special Event Area Site General User Group Classification 1-3 General User Group Classification 4 Epicenter Special Event Area $100.00/hour $100.00/hour SECTION 6: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Engineering Services Department: Title Description Cost Street Light Provide cost recovery for administrative/inspection $53.00 Inspection staff time for new street light poles. New inspection rate is good from 1-10 poles. Poles will be billed in increments of 10. Street Light Plan Provide cost recovery for administrative staff time and $715.00 Check for Electrical Engineering Consultant for street light ole plan check. Title Description Cost Street Light Plan Street light plan check to provide for cost recovery for $284.00 Check — Additional Electrical Engineering Consultant to review additional Development Pages pages. 58.00 Illegal Bin Removal Provide cost recovery to Environmental Programs for $110.00 Notice Fee administrative staff time to process and post 24-hour Parking within 20' of Traffic Control Device 53.00 Notice to Remove for Illegal Bin. R.C.M.C. 10.44.040 Illegal Bin Removal Provide cost recovery to Environmental Programs for $43.00 Administrative Fee administrative staff time and costs related to the 53.00 58.00 removal of illegal hauler bin. Vending from a Vehicle SECTION 7: The City hereby amends Resolution 12-196 and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Planning Department, including a technology fee of 5%: Title Description Current Fee New Fee Hillside To reflect hours required to process and $3,468 $11,187.00 Development provide necessary consistency with Design 53.00 58.00 Review(>5 Review application for non -hillside projects. 53.00 58.00 dwelling units Parking within 20' of Traffic Control Device 53.00 58.00 The fee set forth in this section shall be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2017, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12 month period ending on December 31st of the immediately preceding year, as released by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 8: The City hereby amends Resolution 10-165 and adopts the following fees for parking citations issued by or as authorized by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department: Section Description Current Bail Proposed Bail R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(A) Parking on Divisional Island $ 53.00 $ 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(D) Prohibited Parking — Red Curb/Sign 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(E) No Parking in Parkway 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.020(H) Parking within 20' of Traffic Control Device 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.040 Obstructing an Alley 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.050(8) Repair/Wash Vehicle on Street 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.110 Vending from a Vehicle 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.44.130 72 Hour Parking 53.00 175.00 R.C.M.C. 10.48.010(B) Yellow Curb Parking 53.00 160.00 R.C.M.C. 10.48.010(C) White Curb Parking 53.00 75.00 R. C.M.C. 10.50.130 Permit Parking 53.00 75.00 Section Description Current Bail ProposedBail R.C.M.C. 10.52.050(A) Res. Over -weight Exceed 5 Tons 203.00 208.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.050(C) Over -weight, Exceed 3 ton or 80 in 153.00 208.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.060(A) Parking Un -attached Trailer on Street 53.00 58.00 R.C.M.C. 10.52.070(A) Parking on Private Property 63.00 100.00 R.C.M.C. 10.54.020(A/B) Parking Elect Vehicle not plugged in or excess 4 Hours 53.00 100.00 R.C.M.C. 10.64.030 Parking RV on Street 2 A.M. - 6 A.M. 63.00 70.00 R.C.M.C. 12.04.010(F) Parking in the Park 10 P.M. --6 A.M. 53.00 110.00 C.V.C. 5200(A) No Front Plate 53.00 130.00 C.V.C. 5204(A) Current Tags Not Displayed 53.00 58.00 C.V.C. 21113(A) Unauthorized School Parking 43.00 58.00 C.V.C. 22500.1 Fire Lane 78.00 78.00 C.V.C. 22500(B) Parking Blocking Crosswalk 110.00 C.V.C. 22500(D) Parking within 15' Fire Station Driveway 110.00 C.V.C. 22500(E) Blocking a Driveway 53.00 58.00 C.V.C. 22500(F) Blocking a Sidewalk 53.00 160.00 C.V.C. 22502(A) Unlawful Curb Parking 53.00 60.00 C.V.C. 22507(A/B) Handicap Stall / Blocking 303.00 260.00 C.V.C. 22515(H) Parking Setting Brake / Stopping Engine 53.00 58.00 C.V.C. 22516 Parking with Person locked inside unable to escape 350.00 C.V.C. 22522 Parking within 3' of sidewalk ramp 260.00 Late Fee - 30 days from date of issue 35.00 SECTION 9: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by all City Departments: Title Description Cost Lien Administration Upon completing all research and determining an $65.00 assessment shall be necessary to recover costs, this fee shall be added to the previously determined costs. Title Description Cost Lien Release Fees to be assessed when fees are paid to the City $72.00 after Council Resolution has been approved for tax lien. SECTION 10: The fees set forth in this Resolution shall take effect January 1, 2017 excluding Planning fees which will be effective 60 days from the adoption of the resolution, consistent with State Law. and TFanspeFtation D „ opment—In;paGt Fee will be eff,eG+e Februa '','2017. SECTION 11: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 16-200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 14-102, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS: 1. In April 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 in April, 1991 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees. 2. On June 4, 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 14-102, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. 3. The Development Mitigation Program approved by the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) requires that project costs and fees, including transportation development fees, be updated biennially. 4. The Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued need for the described capital improvements, and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate. 5. On December 7, 2016, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision herein were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing. 6. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds as follows: a. The purpose of the fee revision herein is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and b. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; and C. The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and d. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and e. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit "B", and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and f. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. 3. Definitions: a. "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development project" includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. b. "Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. C. "Equivalent dwelling unit" or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing unit is equal to one EDU. 4. Payment of Fee: The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any building permit or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first; unless otherwise pre-empted by State regulations. The City Engineer shall determine the amount of the fee based upon the size and type of development. 5. Fee Schedule: The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $9,382 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C". 6. EDU / Land Use Equivalent Schedule: The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential — Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium — Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel — Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care — Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage — Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station — Per Pump 5.0 EDU 7. Use of Fee: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". 8. Administration Fee: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 9. Fee Review: The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing, and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 10. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees as herein adopted, described, and amended shall not be collected by the City until March 1, 2017. 11. Judicial Challenge: Any judicial action proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. 12. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. EXHIBIT "A" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM PROJECTS & PROJECT COSTS Freeway Interchanges Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings Project Estimate F1 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $352,920 F2 Foothill Boulevard at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $1,146,990 F3 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $21,279,000 F4 Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange $42,661,800 F5 Grove Avenue / 4th Street at 1-10 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $4,671,000 Total: $70,111,710 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings Bridges Project Estimate R1 Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $11,251,920 R2 6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 R3 6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 R4 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 Total: $13,992,240 Bridges Streets Project Estimate B1 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $2,127,900 B2 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $1,008,936 B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch - Widen Existing Bridge $990,252 B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,127,268 B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $6,438,714 B6 Whitram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $1,241,448 B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $1,277,778 B8 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $2,151,774 Total: $16,364,070 Streets Project Estimate LS2 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $691,308 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,398,186 Streets:: Project Estimate S3 Arrow Route - 500' E/O 1-15 Freeway to 1,300' E/O 1-15 Freeway - Widen South Side $1,160,484 S4 Banyan Street - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen North Side $1,024,506 S5 Banyan Street - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New Alignment $8,448,282 S6 Base Line Road - Etiwanda Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen North Side 2 to 3 Lanes $1,020,354 S7 Cherry Avenue - Wilson Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen West Side $1,236,258 S8 Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,324,488 S9 East Avenue - 1-15 to Victoria Street - Various Bottlenecks $847,008 S10 East Avenue - Fire Station to Wilson - New $1,344,210 S11 East Avenue - Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way - New $454,644 S12 Etiwanda Avenue - 6th Street to Arrow Route - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $4,281,750 S13 Etiwanda Avenue - Miller Avenue to 850' N/O Miller Avenue - Widen East Side $292,716 S14 Etiwanda Avenue - Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue - Curb and Gutter East Side Only $964,302 S15 Etiwanda Avenue - Existing Northern Terminus to North Rim Way - New $544,950 S16 Foothill Boulevard - Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $1,249,752 S17 Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue to 700' E/O Hellman Avenue - Widen North Side Only $2,003,340 S18 Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue - Widen Intersection $7,520,310 S19 Foothill Boulevard - Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $2,033,442 S20 Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Tapia Via - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $1,114,812 S21 Grove Avenue - San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $686,118 S22 Haven Avenue - Base Line Road to 1-210 Freeway - Widen West Side Only $12,806,844 S23 Lower Crest Road - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - New $1,667,028 S24 Miller Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $2,518,188 S25 Milliken Avenue - 5th Street to 700' S/O 5th Street - Widen West Side Only $316,590 S26 Victoria Street - East Property Line of Etiwanda High School to 1-15 Freeway - Improve Both Shoulders $305,172 S27 Vintage Drive - Etiwanda Avenue to 1,300' W/O Etiwanda Avenue - New $892,680 S28 Wilson Avenue - Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard - New $7,083,312 S29 Wilson Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Backbone Only $586,470 S30 Wilson Avenue - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $6,228,000 S31 Youngs Canyon - Cherry Avenue to Wardman Bullock - New $9,757,200 Total: $81,802,704 Tra;c'Signals li Project Estimate T1 4th Street at Richmond Place $363,300 T2 4th Street at Utica Avenue $363,300 T3 6th Street at Buffalo Avenue $363,300 T4 6th Street at Cleveland Avenue $363,300 T5 6th Street at Etiwanda Avenue $363,300 T6 6th Street at Hellman Avenue $363,300 T7 6th Street at Pittsburgh Avenue $363,300 T8 6th Street at Rochester Avenue $363,300 T9 6th Street at Santa Anita Avenue $363,300 T10 6th Street at Utica Avenue $363,300 T11 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street $363,300 T12 Archibald Avenue at San Bernardino Road $363,300 T13 Archibald Avenue at Victoria Street $363,300 T14 Archibald Avenue at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T15 Arrow Route at Center Avenue $363,300 T16 Banyan Street at Rochester Avenue $363,300 T17 Banyan Street at Wardman Bullock Road $363,300 T18 Base Line Road at San Carmela Court $363,300 T19 Base Line Road at Shelby Place $363,300 T20 Carnelian Street at Banyan Street $363,300 T21 Carnelian Street at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T22 Cherry Avenue at Youngs Canyon Road $363,300 T23 Church Street at Elm Avenue $363,300 T24 Church Street at Mayten Avenue $363,300 T25 Church Street at Ramona Avenue $363,300 T26 Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway $363,300 T27 Civic Center Drive at Red Oak Street $363,300 T28 Ridgeline Place at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T29 Day Creek Boulevard at Madrigal Place $363,300 T30 Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T31 East Avenue at Miller Avenue $363,300 T32 East Avenue at Highland Avenue $363,300 T33 Etiwanda Avenue at Garcia Drive $363,300 T34 Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue $363,300 Trak Signa/s Project Estimate T35 Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Court $363,300 T36 Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue $363,300 T37 Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue $363,300 T38 Haven Avenue at Trademark Street $363,300 T39 Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue $363,300 T40 Haven Avenue at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T41 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street $363,300 T42 Hermosa Avenue at Church Street $363,300 T43 Milliken Avenue at 5th Street $363,300 T44 Milliken Avenue at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T45 Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard $363,300 T46 Spruce Avenue at Elm Avenue $363,300 T47 Spruce Avenue at Mountain View Drive $363,300 T48 Spruce Avenue at Red Oak Street $363,300 T49 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue $363,300 T50 Terra Vista Parkway at Town Center Drive $363,300 T51 Town Center Drive at Elm Avenue $363,300 T52 Wilson Avenue at East Avenue $363,300 T53 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue $363,300 T54 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue (West) $363,300 T55 Wilson Avenue at San Sevaine Road $363,300 T56 Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road $363,300 T57 Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue $363,300 T58 4th Street at Golden Lock Road - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T59 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T60 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $51,900 T61 Arrow Route at Red Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T62 Arrow Route at White Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T63 Banyan Street at East Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T64 Base Line Road at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T65 Base Line Road at Spruce Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T66 Base Line Road at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T67 Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T68 Day Creek Boulevard at Sugar Gum Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T69 Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 Traffic Signals Signal Interconnect System Project Estimate T70 Milliken Avenue at Millenium Court - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T71 Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T72 Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T73 Milliken Avenue at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T74 Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 Total: $20,344,800 Signal Interconnect System Program Totals Category Project Estimate S11 Signal Interconnect System $7,992,600 Total: $7,992,600 Program Totals Category Estimate Freeway Interchanges $70,111,710 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings $13,992,240 Bridges $16,364,070 Streets $81,802,704 Traffic Signals $20,344,800 Signal Interconnect Systems $7,992,600 Total: $210,608,124 DIF Program Cost Item Estimate Program Total $210,608,124 Less Fund Balance as of 2005 -$20,000,000 Sub -Total $190,608,124 Administration Fee (15%) $28,591,219 Total: $219,199,343 EXHIBIT "B" TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES Land Use Type Fee Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $9,382 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit $5,629 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit $5,629 Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) - Per Bedroom $1,876 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed $1,876 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $14,073 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet $11,258 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $5,629 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet $4,691 Hotel / Motel - Per Room $7,506 Day Care - Per Student $2,346 Self -Storage - Per Unit $188 Service Station - Per Pump $46,910 EXHIBIT "C" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM CALCULATIONS 1/acant Lana)as,°of February 2005 Vacant Residential Property = 950 acres Single Family Dwelling Units (SFDU) = 5,363 units Multi -Family Dwelling Units (MFDU) = 5,248 units Vacant Industrial Property = 719 acres = 31,319,640 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5, then the future square footage of industrial development is 31,319,640 square feet x 0.5 = 15,659,820 square feet. Vacant Commercial Property = 334 acres = 14,549,040 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future square footage of commercial development is 14,549,040 square feet x 0.25 = 3,637,260 square feet. Egu��alent, Dwelling Units (EDU) per Land.Use ,. ; Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to be tabulated for each type of land use, the "Equivalent Dwelling Units" or EDU for each type of land use must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type's EDU is based on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Per City Resolution No. 91-092, the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential — Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium — Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel — Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care — Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage — Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station — Per Pump 5.0 EDU Total Future Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) Calculate Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) Item Vacant Land EDU by Future Land Use as of February 2005 Land Equivalent $5,629 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit Use Dwelling Units Single -Family Dwelling Unit 5,363 Units 1.00 5,363 Multi -Family Dwelling Unit 5,248 Units 0.60 3,149 Industrial Park (per 1,000 SF) 15,659,820 Square Feet 0.60 9,396 Commercial (per 1,000 SF) 3,637,260 Square Feet 1.50 5,455 Total Future EDU 23,363 Calculate Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) Item Fees Total Cost of Projects $219,199,343 Total Future EDU (as of February 2005) 23,363 Cost per EDU $9,382 Calculate Transportation Development Fees by Land Use Item EDU by Land Use Fees Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 $9,382 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 $5,629 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 $5,629 Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) - Per Bedroom 0.2 $1,876 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 $1,876 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 $14,073 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 $11,258 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 $5,629 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 $4,691 Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 $7,506 Day Care - Per Student 0.25 $2,346 Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 $188 Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 $46,910 MR RESOLUTION NO. 16-200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 14-102, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS: 1. In April 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 in April, 1991 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees. 2. On June 4, 2014, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 14-102, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. 3. The Development Mitigation Program approved by the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency (CMA) requires that project costs and fees, including transportation development fees, be updated biennially. 4. The Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued need for the described capital improvements, and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate. 5. On December 7, 2016, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision herein were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing. 6. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows: The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds as follows: a. The purpose of the fee revision herein is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and b. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; and WI C. The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and d. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and e. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit "B", and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and f. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. 3. Definitions: a. "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development project" includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. b. "Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. C. "Equivalent dwelling unit" or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing unit is equal to one EDU. 4. Payment of Fee: The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid prior to issuance of any building permit or issuance of a certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first; unless otherwise pre-empted by State regulations. The City Engineer shall determine the amount of the fee based upon the size and type of development. 5. Fee Schedule: The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $9,382 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C". 6. EDU / Land Use Equivalent Schedule: The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential — Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium — Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 EDU ':i Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel — Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care — Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage — Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station — Per Pump 5.0 EDU 7. Use of Fee: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". 8. Administration Fee: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 9. Fee Review: The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts of the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing, and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 10. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees as herein adopted, described, and amended shall not be collected by the City until February 1, 2017. 11. Judicial Challenge: Any judicial action proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. 12. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. EXHIBIT "A" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM PROJECTS & PROJECT COSTS Freeway Interchanges Railroad Grade Separations and Cro Project Estimate F1 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $352,920 F2 Foothill Boulevard at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $1,146,990 F3 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $21,279,000 F4 Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange $42,661,800 F5 Grove Avenue / 4th Street at 1-10 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $4,671,000 Total: $70,111,710 Railroad Grade Separations and Cro Bridges Project Estimate R1 Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $11,251,920 R2 6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 R3 6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 R4 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 Total: $13,992,240 Bridges Streets 6 Project Estimate B1 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $2,127,900 B2 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $1,008,936 B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch - Widen Existing Bridge $990,252 B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,127,268 B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $6,438,714 B6 Whitram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $1,241,448 B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $1,277,778 B8 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $2,151,774 Total: $16,364,070 Streets 6 Project Estimate S1 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $691,308 S2 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,398,186 EXHIBIT "A" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM PROJECTS & PROJECT COSTS Freeway Interchanges Railroad Grade Separations and Cro Project Estimate F1 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $352,920 F2 Foothill Boulevard at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $1,146,990 F3 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $21,279,000 F4 Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange $42,661,800 F5 Grove Avenue / 4th Street at 1-10 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $4,671,000 Total: $70,111,710 Railroad Grade Separations and Cro Bridges Project Estimate R1 Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $11,251,920 R2 6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 R3 6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 R4 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $913,440 Total: $13,992,240 Bridges Streets 6 Project Estimate B1 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $2,127,900 B2 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $1,008,936 B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch - Widen Existing Bridge $990,252 B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,127,268 B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $6,438,714 B6 Whitram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $1,241,448 B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $1,277,778 B8 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $2,151,774 Total: $16,364,070 Streets 6 Project Estimate S1 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $691,308 S2 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,398,186 MAI Streets Project Estimate S3 Arrow Route - 500' E/O 1-15 Freeway to 1,300' E/O 1-15 Freeway - Widen South Side $1,160,484 S4 Banyan Street - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen North Side $1,024,506 S5 Banyan Street - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New Alignment $8,448,282 S6 Base Line Road - Etiwanda Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen North Side 2 to 3 Lanes $1,020,354 S7 Cherry Avenue - Wilson Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen West Side $1,236,258 S8 Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,324,488 S9 East Avenue - 1-15 to Victoria Street - Various Bottlenecks $847,008 S10 East Avenue - Fire Station to Wilson - New $1,344,210 S11 East Avenue - Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way - New $454,644 S12 Etiwanda Avenue - 6th Street to Arrow Route - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $4,281,750 S13 Etiwanda Avenue - Miller Avenue to 850' N/O Miller Avenue - Widen East Side $292,716 S14 Etiwanda Avenue - Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue - Curb and Gutter East Side Only $964,302 S15 Etiwanda Avenue - Existing Northern Terminus to North Rim Way - New $544,950 S16 Foothill Boulevard - Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $1,249,752 S17 Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue to 700' E/O Hellman Avenue - Widen North Side Only $2,003,340 S18 Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue - Widen Intersection $7,520,310 S19 Foothill Boulevard - Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $2,033,442 S20 Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Tapia Via - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $1,114,812 S21 Grove Avenue - San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $686,118 S22 Haven Avenue - Base Line Road to 1-210 Freeway - Widen West Side Only $12,806,844 S23 Lower Crest Road - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - New $1,667,028 S24 Miller Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $2,518,188 S25 Milliken Avenue - 5th Street to 700' S/O 5th Street - Widen West Side Only $316,590 S26 Victoria Street - East Property Line of Etiwanda High School to 1-15 Freeway - Improve Both Shoulders $305,172 S27 Vintage Drive - Etiwanda Avenue to 1,300'W/0 Etiwanda Avenue - New $892,680 S28 Wilson Avenue - Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard - New $7,083,312 S29 Wilson Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Backbone Only $586,470 S30 Wilson Avenue - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $6,228,000 S31 Youngs Canyon - Cherry Avenue to Wardman Bullock - New $9,757,200 Total: $81,802,704 Traffic Signals Project Estimate T1 4th Street at Richmond Place $363,300 T2 4th Street at Utica Avenue $363,300 T3 6th Street at Buffalo Avenue $363,300 T4 6th Street at Cleveland Avenue $363,300 T5 6th Street at Etiwanda Avenue $363,300 T6 6th Street at Hellman Avenue $363,300 T7 6th Street at Pittsburgh Avenue $363,300 T8 6th Street at Rochester Avenue $363,300 T9 6th Street at Santa Anita Avenue $363,300 T10 6th Street at Utica Avenue $363,300 T11 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street $363,300 T12 Archibald Avenue at San Bernardino Road $363,300 T13 Archibald Avenue at Victoria Street $363,300 T14 Archibald Avenue at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T15 Arrow Route at Center Avenue $363,300 T16 Banyan Street at Rochester Avenue $363,300 T17 Banyan Street at Wardman Bullock Road $363,300 T18 Base Line Road at San Carmela Court $363,300 T19 Base Line Road at Shelby Place $363,300 T20 Carnelian Street at Banyan Street $363,300 T21 Carnelian Street at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T22 Cherry Avenue at Youngs Canyon Road $363,300 T23 Church Street at Elm Avenue $363,300 T24 Church Street at Mayten Avenue $363,300 T25 Church Street at Ramona Avenue $363,300 T26 Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway $363,300 T27 Civic Center Drive at Red Oak Street $363,300 T28 Ridgeline Place at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T29 Day Creek Boulevard at Madrigal Place $363,300 T30 Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T31 East Avenue at Miller Avenue $363,300 T32 East Avenue at Highland Avenue $363,300 T33 Etiwanda Avenue at Garcia Drive $363,300 T34 Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue $363,300 ':: Traffic Signals Project Estimate T35 Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Court $363,300 T36 Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue $363,300 T37 Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue $363,300 T38 Haven Avenue at Trademark Street $363,300 T39 Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue $363,300 T40 Haven Avenue at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T41 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street $363,300 T42 Hermosa Avenue at Church Street $363,300 T43 Milliken Avenue at 5th Street $363,300 T44 Milliken Avenue at Wilson Avenue $363,300 T45 Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard $363,300 T46 Spruce Avenue at Elm Avenue $363,300 T47 Spruce Avenue at Mountain View Drive $363,300 T48 Spruce Avenue at Red Oak Street $363,300 T49 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue $363,300 T50 Terra Vista Parkway at Town Center Drive $363,300 T51 Town Center Drive at Elm Avenue $363,300 T52 Wilson Avenue at East Avenue $363,300 T53 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue $363,300 T54 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue (West) $363,300 T55 Wilson Avenue at San Sevaine Road $363,300 T56 Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road $363,300 T57 Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue $363,300 T58 4th Street at Golden Lock Road - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T59 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T60 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $51,900 T61 Arrow Route at Red Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T62 Arrow Route at White Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T63 Banyan Street at East Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T64 Base Line Road at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T65 Base Line Road at Spruce Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T66 Base Line Road at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T67 Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T68 Day Creek Boulevard at Sugar Gum Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T69 Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 Traffic Signals Signal Interconnect System Project Estimate T70 Milliken Avenue at Millenium Court - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T71 Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T72 Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T73 Milliken Avenue at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 T74 Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $25,950 Total: _$20,344,800 Signal Interconnect System ProgW Tota Category Project Estimate Sli Signal Interconnect System $7,992,600 Total: $7,99Z 600 ProgW Tota Category Estimate Freeway Interchanges $70,111,710 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings $13,992,240 Bridges $16,364,070 Streets $81,802,704 Traffic Signals $20,344,800 Signal Interconnect Systems $7,992,600 Total: $210,608,124 DIF Program Cost Item Estimate Program Total $210,608,124 Less Fund Balance as of 2005 -$20,000,000 Sub -Total $190,608,124 Administration Fee (15%) $28,591,219 Total: $219,199,343 EXHIBIT "B" TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES Land Use Type Fee Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $9,382 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit $5,629 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit $5,629 Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) - Per Bedroom $1,876 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed $1,876 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $14,073 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet $11,258 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $5,629 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet $4,691 Hotel / Motel - Per Room $7,506 Day Care - Per Student $2,346 Self -Storage - Per Unit $188 Service Station - Per Pump $46,910 .;. EXHIBIT "C" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM CALCULATIONS Vacant Land as of February 2005 Vacant Residential Property = 950 acres Single Family Dwelling Units (SFDU) = 5,363 units Multi -Family Dwelling Units (MFDU) = 5,248 units Vacant Industrial Property = 719 acres = 31,319,640 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5, then the future square footage of industrial development is 31,319,640 square feet x 0.5 = 15,659,820 square feet. Vacant Commercial Property = 334 acres = 14,549,040 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future square footage of commercial development is 14,549,040 square feet x 0.25 = 3,637,260 square feet. Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) per Land Use Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to be tabulated for each type of land use, the "Equivalent Dwelling Units" or EDU for each type of land use must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type's EDU is based on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Per City Resolution No. 91-092, the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential — Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential — Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium — Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care — Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park — Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse — Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel — Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care — Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage — Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station — Per Pump 5.0 EDU WOO Total Future Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) Calculate Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) Item Vacant Land EDU by Future Land Use as of February 2005 Land Equivalent $5,629 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit Use Dwelling Units Single -Family Dwelling Unit 5,363 Units 1.00 5,363 Multi -Family Dwelling Unit 5,248 Units 0.60 3,149 Industrial Park (per 1,000 SF) 15,659,820 Square Feet 0.60 9,396 Commercial (per 1,000 SF) 3,637,260 Square Feet 1.50 5,455 Total Future EDU 23,363 Calculate Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) Item Fees Total Cost of Projects $219,199,343 Total Future EDU (as of February 2005) 23,363 Cost per EDU $9,382 Calculate Transportation Development Fees by Land Use Item EDU Laby Land Use Fees Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 $9,382 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 $5,629 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 $5,629 Senior Housing Attached (Condo or Apartment) - Per Bedroom 0.2 $1,876 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 $1,876 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 $14,073 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 $11,258 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 $5,629 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 $4,691 Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 $7,506 Day Care - Per Student 0.25 $2,346 Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 $188 Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 $46,910 P91 RESOLUTION NO. FD 16-030 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND WAIVING THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN PERMIT FEES. A. RECITALS. (i) The California Government Code requires that prior to levying a new fee or increasing an existing fee or service charge, as hereinafter set forth, the local agency shall hold a noticed public hearing to consider the matter. (ii) On Dec 7, 2016, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District conducted and concluded a duly noticed public hearing concerning the proposed fees, as required by law. (iii) All legal prerequisites to adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District hereby finds and resolves as follows: 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A of the Resolution, are true and correct. 2. The Fire District has conducted a study of all costs incurred by the District in providing inspection and permit services. Costs to the District in providing the Services include, but are not limited to, salary and benefits paid to District employees, cost of maintaining the necessary equipment and facilities, asset usage costs, and risk management costs. 3. The Fire District has calculated the minimum number of staff -hours that will necessarily be expended based upon the specific type of Services required. 4. The fee amounts established herein do not exceed the minimum cost to the District in providing each of the listed services to include the initial inspection and one re -inspection. 5. The Fire Code of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as adopted by Ordinance No. FD 56 has two required operational permits which were not included in previous ordinances. 6. Fees for the aforementioned operational permits have not been established in fee resolutions previously approved by the Board. 7. The Board hereby approves and adopts the following permit fees: a. Carbon dioxide systems used in beverage dispensing $110 b. Mobile motor fuel -dispensing $165 '•i 8. For fiscal year 2016-17, there does not exist a fiscal need to collect the fees approved herein. 9. The Board hereby waives collection of the fees approved herein for fiscal year 2016-2017 only. Thereafter, said fees will be collected unless the Board again approves a waiver as to such collection. 10. Nothing in this Resolution shall be deemed to affect any other fees of the District currently in effect. 11. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. P93 STAFF REPORT Date: December 7, 2016 RANCHOCUCAMONGA To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager From: Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Directorfd Subject: CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING BASIS FOR EXCEPTION TO THE 180 -DAY WAIT PERIOD GC SECTIONS 7522.56 & 21221(H) TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT, AND CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS OF GC SECTION 21221(H) TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council consider approval of a resolution certifying the basis for exception to the 180 -day wait period and to allow a California Public Employee Retirement System retiree to fill an executive position during an ongoing recruitment and consider approval of a resolution certifying the requirements to allow a California Public Employee Retirement System (CaIPERS) retiree to fill an executive position during an ongoing recruitment. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Trang Huynh, the City's current Building and Safety Services Director will be retired on December 31, 2016. The City has a current open recruitment for the position, but we do not anticipate filling the position until March. It is in the best interest of the City that we have a responsible Building and Safety Services Director in place to provide leadership, guidance and direction to Department staff checking plans and inspecting buildings for compliance with laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations governing the safety, construction, and alteration of buildings including structural, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing and certain fire and life safety systems; issue building, grading, and related permits for building construction activities within the city. One way to do this and help keep the numerous building projects currently underway on track is to hire the retired Director to perform these duties until the recruitment is completed. Under the Government Code, a public agency may hire a retiree to fill a vacant executive position during the recruitment process prior to the normal 180 -day waiting period if certain conditions are met. Those conditions are that the City Council must certify that the nature of the employment and that the appointment are necessary to fill a critically needed position before 180 days have passed, and the appointment must be approved by the governing body of the employer in a public meeting. In addition, the appointment may not be placed on a consent calendar. EI CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING BASIS FOR EXCEPTION TO THE 180 - DAY WAIT PERIOD GC SECTIONS 7522.56 & 21221(H TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT AND CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS OF GC SECTION 21221 n TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT In addition to the pending retirement of the Director of Building and Safety, current Library Director Michelle Perera's last day is December 8. She is leaving the City to take on the challenge of overseeing the City of Pasadena Library System. Robert Karatsu, the City's former Library Director has been retired in the CalPERS system since December of 2014. The City will be opening the recruitment for the position in January, but we do not anticipate filling the position until spring of next year. It is in the best interest of the City that we have a responsible Library Director in place to provide leadership, guidance and direction to Department staff to assure the continuance and improvements of programs for the community, oversee the completion of the first phase of the Second Floor of the Biane Library at Victoria Gardens, and assure the orderly transition for the new Director that we hire. One way to do this and help keep the numerous library projects currently underway on track is to hire the retired Director to perform these duties until the recruitment is completed. Under the Government Code, a public agency may hire a retiree to fill a vacant executive position during the recruitment process if certain conditions are met. Those conditions are that the City Council must certify that the nature of the employment and that the appointment are necessary to fill a critically needed position, and the appointment must be approved by the governing body of the employer in a public meeting. In addition, the appointment may not be placed on a consent calendar. By approving the attached Resolutions, the City Council would meet the statutory requirements and Mr. Huynh and Mr. Karatsu can be retained during the respective recruitments for the two open executive positions. Attachments: Resolution 16-201 Resolution 16-202 P95 RESOLUTION NO. 16-201 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING BASIS FOR EXCEPTION TO THE 180 -DAY WAIT PERIOD GC SECTIONS 7522.56 & 21221(H) TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT WHEREAS in compliance with Government Code section 7522.56 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga must provide CalPERS this certification resolution when hiring a retiree before 180 days has passed since his or her retirement date; and WHEREAS Trang Huynh will retire from City of Rancho Cucamonga in the position of Building and Safety Services Director, effective December 31, 2016; and WHEREAS section 7522.56 requires that post-retirement employment commence no earlier than 180 days after the retirement date, which is July 1, 2017 without this certification resolution; and WHEREAS section 7522.56 provides that this exception to the 180 day wait period shall not apply if the retiree accepts any retirement -related incentive; and WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Trang Huynh certify that Trang Huynh has not and will not receive a Golden Handshake or any other retirement -related incentive; and WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby appoints Trang Huynh as an interim appointment retired annuitant to the vacant position of Building and Safety Services Director for the City of Rancho Cucamonga under Government Code section 21221(h), effective January 1, 2017; and WHEREAS an appointment under Government Code section 21221(h) requires an active, publicly posted recruitment for a permanent replacement; and WHEREAS the current status of this recruitment is open and accepting applications; and WHEREAS this section 21221(h) appointment shall only be made once and therefore will end on July 1, 2017 or upon filling the position, whichever is earlier; and WHEREAS the entire employment agreement, contract or appointment document between Trang Huynh and the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been reviewed by this body and is attached herein; and WHEREAS no matters, issues, terms or conditions related to this employment and appointment have been or will be placed on a consent calendar; and WHEREAS the employment shall be limited to 960 hours per fiscal year; and WHEREAS the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and WHEREAS the maximum base salary for this position is $12,342 and the hourly equivalent is $71.20, and the minimum base salary for this position is $8,705 and the hourly equivalent is $50.22 and WHEREAS the hourly rate paid to Trang Huynh will be $71.20; and WHEREAS Trang Huynh has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies the nature of the appointment of Trang Huynh as described herein and detailed in the attached employment agreement/contract/appointment document and that this appointment is necessary to fill the critically needed position of Building and Safety Services Director for the City of Rancho Cucamonga by January 1, 2017 because a responsible executive employee is needed to provide leadership, guidance and direction to Department staff involved in checking plans and inspecting buildings for compliance with laws, codes, ordinances, and regulations governing the safety, construction, and alteration of buildings including structural, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing and certain fire and life safety systems; issue building, grading, and related permits for building construction activities within the city. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7 day of December 2016. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk '•: Mayor L. Dennis Michael I Mayor Pro Tem Sam Spagnolo Council Members William J. Alexander, Lynne Kennedy, Diane Willis s' City Manager John R. Gillison 10500 Civic Center Drive I P.O. Box 807 ' Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729-0807 1 909.477.2700 1 www.CiryofRC.us December 7, 2016 Trang Huynh Building and Safety Services Director 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91030 RE: Interim Appointment Building and Safety Services Director during an ongoing recruitment Dear Mr. Huynh: I am pleased to extend to you an offer of employment for the position of Interim Building and Safety Services Director at $71.20 per hour with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In compliance with the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act "PEPRA", the City acknowledges that this interim appointment will be effective January 1, 2017, and end no later than June 30, 2017, per CalPERS exception to the 180 -day waiting GC Section 7522.56 and GC Section 21221(h). Resolution No. 16-201, "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING BASIS FOR EXCEPTION TO THE 180 -DAY WAIT PERIOD GC SECTIONS 7522.56 & 21221(H) TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT" By accepting this offer of temporary employment, you agree that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will enroll you as a retired annuitant and will report your hours worked with the hourly pay rate to CalPERS. As a CalPERS retiree, you will be limited to working a maximum of 960 hours per fiscal year. Starting Salary Step: 1667 ($71.20/hr.) This is the top step of the Building and Safety Services Director range. No other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation will be paid. The City must enroll Mr. Huynh as a retired annuitant and his pay rate with hours worked will be reported in the "my CaIPERS" system. Classification: Interim Appointment Building and Safety Services Director This offer of employment contains the entire offer. There are no other expressed or implied promises, representations or contracts being offered to you. Your interim employment is considered "at will" and termination may occur at any time with or without cause. If you have any questions regarding your appointment, please feel free to call me at (909) 477-2700, ext. 2401. Sincerely, Robert Neiuber Human Resources Director Human Resources Department Attachment: Acknowledgement ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONDITIONAL OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT I understand the terms and conditions of employment. I certify that I did not receive any unemployment insurance payments within the 12 months prior to this appointment for previous retired annuitant work with any CaIPERS employer. I further understand that, if hired, I would be an at -will employee and that termination may occur at any time with or without cause without right of appeal or hearing. Received and Accepted by Date ... RESOLUTION NO. 16-202 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING BASIS FOR GC SECTIONS 21221(H) TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT WHEREAS the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby appoints Robert Karatsu as an interim appointment retired annuitant to the vacant position of Library Director for the City of Rancho Cucamonga under Government Code section 21221(h), effective January 3, 2017; and WHEREAS an appointment under Government Code section 21221(h) requires an active, publicly posted recruitment for a permanent replacement; and WHEREAS the current status of this recruitment is that it will be open and accepting applications prior to Mr. Karatsu assuming the interim position; and WHEREAS this section 21221(h) appointment shall only be made once and therefore will end on July 1, 2017 or upon filling the position, whichever is earlier; and WHEREAS the entire employment agreement, contract or appointment document between Robert Karatsu and the City of Rancho Cucamonga has been reviewed by this body and is attached herein; and WHEREAS no matters, issues, terms or conditions related to this employment and appointment have been or will be placed on a consent calendar; and WHEREAS the employment shall be limited to 960 hours per fiscal year; and WHEREAS the compensation paid to retirees cannot be less than the minimum nor exceed the maximum monthly base salary paid to other employees performing comparable duties, divided by 173.333 to equal the hourly rate; and WHEREAS the maximum base salary for this position is $12,465 and the hourly equivalent is $71.92, and the minimum base salary for this position is $8,792 and the hourly equivalent is $50.72 and WHEREAS the hourly rate paid to Robert Karatsu will be $60.10; and WHEREAS Robert Karatsu has not and will not receive any other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefit or other form of compensation in addition to this hourly pay rate; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby certifies the nature of the appointment of Robert Karatsu as described herein and detailed in the attached employment agreement/contract/appointment document and that this appointment is necessary to fill the 10 critically needed position of Library Director for the City of Rancho Cucamonga by January 3, 2017 because a responsible executive employee is needed to provide leadership, guidance and direction to Department staff, to assure the continuance and improvements of programs for the community, oversee the completion of the first phase of the Second Floor of the Library at Victoria Gardens, and assure an orderly transition for the new Director that we hire. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 7 day of December 2016. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 7 day of December 2016. Mavor L. Dennis Michael I Mavor Pro Tem Sam SDaenolo December 7, 2016 Robert Karatsu RE: Interim Appointment Library Director during an ongoing recruitment Dear Mr. Karatsu: I am pleased to extend to you an offer of employment for the position of Interim Library Director at $60.10 per hour (Step 1633) with the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In compliance with the Public Employees' Pension Reform Act "PEPRA", the City acknowledges that this interim appointment will be effective January 3, 2017, and end no later than June 30, 2017, per CalPERS GC Section 21221(h). Resolution No. 16-202, "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CERTIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS OF GC SECTION 21221(H) TO ALLOW A CALPERS RETIREE TO FILL AN EXECUTIVE POSITION DURING AN ONGOING RECRUITMENT" By accepting this offer of temporary employment, you agree that the City of Rancho Cucamonga will enroll you as a retired annuitant and will report your hours worked with the hourly pay rate to CalPERS. As a CaIPERS retiree, you will be limited to working a maximum of 960 hours per fiscal year. Starting Salary Step: 1633 ($60.10/hr.) This is within the Library Director range. No other benefit, incentive, compensation in lieu of benefits, or other form of compensation will be paid. The City must enroll Mr. Karatsu as a retired annuitant and his pay rate with hours worked will be reported in the "my CaIPERS" system. Classification: Interim Appointment Library Director This offer of employment contains the entire offer. There are no other expressed or implied promises, representations or contracts being offered to you. Your interim employment is considered "at will" and termination may occur at any time with or without cause. P102 If you have any questions regarding your appointment, please feel free to call me at (909) 477-2700, ext. 2401. Sincerely, Robert Neiuber Human Resources Director Human Resources Department Attachment: Acknowledgement ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONDITIONAL OFFER OF EMPLOYMENT I understand the terms and conditions of employment. I certify that I did not receive any unemployment insurance payments within the 12 months prior to this appointment for previous retired annuitant work with any CaIPERS employer, and that I have been retired for more than 180 days. I further understand that, if hired, I would be an at -will employee and that termination may occur at any time with or without cause without right of appeal or hearing. Received and Accepted by Date B uilding a BetterBaseLeine 1-15 Base Line Road Interchange Improvement Project UFR rm % a 0 B.7.%. BBErrEx EjIN j I-15 BA.�&FLSNE ROAD �� All CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — ,tA,o T -11 - , t —,- a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I-15/BASE LINE ROAD INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT RIBBON CUTTING CEREMONY Logan's Roadhouse 1 13480 Baseline Ave, Fontana, CA 92336 SANRAG r AW A 7 9--mRv- w A 1 71 Ism. (.-,00��lc eart 34-07'17.10" N 11713,051.2-9A elev 1305 ft eye alt 4574 ft CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BErrEx Ej,P,5 IN 0- L .6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Fundin Developer Impact Fees • Redevelopment Agency Bond Proceeds • Measure • Prop -113 SLPP • SAFETEA-LU