Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017/08/23 - Minutes - PC-HPC/1VVVV I LJj LV 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca X Vice Chairman Macias A Commissioner Fletcher X Commissioner Munoz A Commissioner Wimberly _X_ • Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, City Planner; Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Albert Espinoza, Asst. City Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner • B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Pat Gonzalez stated he lives on Red Hill. He expressed concern regarding Items D3-D7 with respect to traffic and the right only turn access to the site. He said traffic will cut through the Red Hill area to get to Base Line Road to the north. Page 1 of 13 AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of August 9, 2017 Moved by Wimberly seconded by Fletcher carried 3-0-2 (Munoz. Macias absent) D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20105 — LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORP. — A review of a proposed subdivision of a property of about 82 acres into five (5) parcels located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 6th Street, south of the Metrolink/BNSF rail line, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues - APN: 0209-272-20. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115, and Pre -Application Review DRC2017-00170. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on May 18, 2016 in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation • (copy on file). Page 2 of 13 P%%J V V V I L J 9 L V I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher asked for clarification of the new condition and if it relates to the construction of public facilities. Candyce Burnett. City Planner, said the condition was crafted so the CFD would be in place prior to any development so all facilities supported by the City would be maintained and the CFD was also fully 100% funded. She said the condition was negotiated by our legal learn, Planning and Engineering staff and satisfied the developer and the City. It allows the developer to sell off parcels but it also funds the CFD prior to improvements that are maintained by the CFD, public improvements such as public streets, parklets, and a community facilities building. • Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney said the developer is required to build certain public improvements as part of each initial map and then as lots are sold the public improvements will be conditioned before the development can occur. Bill Kennedy, Project Manager, said they accept the revised condition and all conditions. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing none, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Wimberly said the process was sufficient: move forward. Commissioner Fletcher said it is straightforward. Moved by Fletcher seconded by Wimberly carried 3-0-2 (Macias, Munoz absent) to adopt Resolution No. 17-73 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20105. D2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20073 — LEWIS MANAGEMENT CORP. — A review of a proposed subdivision of a property of about 84 acres into twenty-seven (27) parcels and one (1) lettered lot located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues - APNs: 0210-082-41, -49, and -52. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115, and Pre -Application Review DRC2017-00170. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an • Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on May 18, 2016 in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment Page 3 of 13 /-'% V V V V I A. J 9 L V I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Nikki Cavazos. Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Hearing and seeing no comment. he closed the public hearing. Bill Kennedy, Project Manager, said he had no additional comments: they accept all the • conditions. Moved by Fletcher seconded by Wimberly carried 3-0-2 (Macias. Munoz absent) to adopt Resolution No. 17-74 approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20073 Items D3-D7 were heard concurrently. D3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2016- 00206 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to amend tables and text, including clarifying text as necessary, in the General Plan to allow the development of land that contains slopes of 30 percent or greater. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017 D4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP MODIFICATION SUBTT16605M - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request subdivide 24.19 acres into 6 parcels for the development of 175 attached condominium units in the Mixed Use (MU) District located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10, Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Design Review DRC2012-00672, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental • impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017. Page 4 of 13 PIV VVV 1 L. aJ9 LV 1 l HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2012-00672 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of - Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Variance DRC2016-00207, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017. • D6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00207 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to exceed the 30 foot building envelop established by Development Code Section 17.122.020.D.1.e.(i and ii) for the develop 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112- 09 and 10. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017. D7. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT - DRC2012-00673 - PACIFIC SUMMIT FOOTHILL, LLC - A request to remove 180 trees associated with the proposed development of 175 attached condominium units on 24.19 acres of land in Mixed Use (MU) District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Pacific Electric Trail Right -of -Way; APN: 0207-101-13, 17, 24, 25, 31, 34, and 41 and 0207-112-09 and 10, Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16605M, Design Review DRC2012-00672, and Variance DRC2016-00207. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 9, 2017. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint Presentation (copy on file). He said the revised conditions of approval include two new conditions and were placed before the Commission for consideration: #3 (Planning Condition) re: the requirement to provide a pedestrian connection to the PE trail at the east side of the project • and Engineering Condition #14 re: Master Plan Storm Drain Line 111-1 be constructed. (copy on file). The new conditions have been incorporated into the attached standard Page 5 of 13 AUGUST 23, 2017 ft" HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA conditions with the resolutions. Prior correspondence received before this agenda production is attached to the staff report. Mr. Grahn noted additional correspondence was received since agenda production regarding the environmental dots submitted by Natasha Walton (discussion follows). Commissioner Fletcher asked if the western half of the site is 30% slope or greater. He asked how long the area has been zoned for mixed use. He also asked for a landscape plan visual with respect to the historical nature of the Sycamore Inn and if a technical geological report was provided and if there are any concerns with respect to construction on that slope. Mr. Grahn said the site has been zoned Mixed Use since about early 2000, only about 6% • of the site is 30% or greater, the applicant will provide a visual of the landscape plan around Sycamore Inn later in the presentation. He noted the geotechnical report was provided and analyzed -the report indicates the soil condition and construction on the slope is not a concern. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the recreational amenities and noted 5 are required but only 4 are listed in the staff report but there are multiples of some amenities which in his mind does not constitute 5. He suggested if pets are allowed to live in the units, the developer should consider putting in a dog park for an additional amenity. Mr. Grahn said staff looked at the total number which satisfies the requirement. 1-le deferred to the applicant. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Chad Stadnicki, Project Manager, thanked the Commission and staff. He said Mr. Grahn has been very helpful with comments and analysis. He noted that in 2006, they had the approvals needed but no market for the product. He said the Site Plan only had a 5-year life and then they decided they could do it better. He gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) and said the new plan tries to address impacts to views, traffic. parking and also enhances Foothill Boulevard and the Sycamore inn. Mark Rogers, the planner for the applicant. continued with their PowerPoint presentation • (copy on file). He commented on the landscaping and buffer provided around the Sycamore Inn site. Page 6 of 13 rwvv.j I ALJ, Lv I i HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Fletcher spoke re: the amenities and suggested they add a dog park as that should be easy and would satisfy the 5 amenities requirement. Mr. Rogers agreed and said there is opportunity to be creative. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Hank Stoy, a resident of the Red Hill area noted Mr. Gratin and Mr. Stadnicki were very accessible and responsive although he still had concerns. He referred to his letter and • newspaper articles. He said the residents had prior assurances that it was safe to manufacture the slope but some existing residences have experienced problems. He said the traffic plan -creates dangerous U-turns, and the regular access and emergency access point is at the far west end. He expressed concern about the added time needed for first responders to travel from the west end of the site to the east end. Paul Gomez, residing in the Red Hill area expressed concern about disturbing the bottom of the slope/hill as he lives on top of the hill. He asked why the General Plan Amendment is needed. He asked more attention be given to existing. unfinished development and suggested using the removed trees be planted in the unfinished medians. Terri DiMarco. a Red Hill resident said traffic is her biggest concern, making a left turn into Red Hill off Vineyard takes a long time (2 lights). She said cars are already using the neighborhood as a pass thru to get to Carnelian and north to Base Line Road. She said noise from Foothill Boulevard will increase. She objected to removing trees and wished they could be replanted and preserve the heritage trees. She said she opposes blocked views in the area and is not in favor of building on the slope. She said there is already an increase of crime: mail boxes are being broken into. She said she liked the rural feel of the area. She asked the neighborhood be saved from this development and asked the proposal be rejected. Natasha Walton, a local biologist said her letter is on file. Her letter expresses concern re loss of character of the hillsides. She said desert cottontails, white sage and the trees are present, and she requested more native plants and trees than non-native plants and trees to provide habitat for the existing animal population. She has a concern about the bats • and their habitat and allowing them to safely abandon the existing trees progressively. She said the lighting should be screened and noted the lights of the restrooms at the Page 7 of 13 AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA trailhead are not shielded and we should preserve the night sky -LED lights are too bright and they affect the birds. She said she would like the City to buy the property and turn it into a park. She said no surveys were supplied for bats -she said to minimize impact to bats a progressive removal of trees should be done. Jack Lieberman, a Red Hill resident, said he attended 3 prior meetings concerning the project. He expressed concern re: GPA. He there is some misunderstanding regarding the geological history. He said LA is built on an Arroyo Seco (dry river bed). He said this project area is similar stating there are 4 hills with ravines -the riverbeds fill with rain waters and this was not mentioned in studies. Fie said the property has not been properly described • Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. He said he heard concerns regarding re: alteration of slopes. traffic management. access/egress, redirection of traffic through the Red Hill neighborhood. and the GPA with respect to the Development Code, Dan Eberhardt stated he is with the applicant's Engineering firm: the geotechnical consultant since 2002. He said there are cut slopes — 2. 1 slopes. 60 feet high. He said they have been analyzed under all types of conditions — dry, saturated, earthquake -the safety factors exceed what is required. He said studies were also done for fill slopes and in all cases they are comfortable: this is not an issue. He said with respect to the MSE wall and gross stability all was evaluated and deemed safe and above the minimum requirements. Fie said the next phase after final grading plans are prepared will be to re- analyze the conditions. He said he takes exception to Mr. Liebermanscomments about there being 4 hills. The hill has erosion channels come from off -site (prior development) and most of the area is an elevated alluvial terrace. He said it erodes when it has concentrated flows and no underground streams were observed. Commissioner Fletcher said he generally believes a developed slope is more stable than undeveloped slope. Mr. Eberhardt said they analyze that it will be stable after it has been cut into: this slope is far in excess of the minimum safety requirements. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the drainage following development. • Page 8 of 13 AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Mark Reider of David Evans and Associates. Civil Engineer said he has been involved since 2004, He said the existing development was built with outlet pipes that cause erosion and some of the gullies. He said there is a master plan storm drain facility that is provided and the storm drain system will drain to that facility as part of the project. He said it will collect the run-off. He said in final engineering a hydrology study will be provided along with hydraulic analysis. He said they are very aware of the hillside and drainage conditions and their storm drain plans will address that in the future. Chairman Oaxaca asked for comment regarding the traffic. • Dan Close, Senior Traffic Engineer (representing the applicant) said the restricted movement allows for better flow on Foothill Boulevard. He said it does create more U- turns and it is not uncommon to restrict driveways from a major arterial. He said the study indicates 1.000 additional daily trips over a 24-hour period -a relatively small number. He said with respect to 'cut thru traffic', their study accounted for this and they also considered the City's study done in 2009. He said traffic movements have been consistent over the last 6 years and it is likely the 'cut thru' patterns will remain the same -additional trips through the neighborhood will be minimal. He said much of the traffic relates to children being delivered to the elementary school. Albert Espinoza, Assistant City Engineer, reported that last Wednesday at the Public Works Subcommittee, the Engineering Services Director, Jason Welday, discussed preliminary options he will be presenting to the Committee in the next couple of months to rehabilitate the west end of Foothill Boulevard from the PE Trail to Grove Avenue. (slide provided -copy on file) One option may include not widening Foothill Boulevard to 6 lanes because of regional improvements to the County such as the 210 Freeway which has redistributed traffic throughout the County (lessening the need for the originally proposed widening project). He said the proposed project will include a new traffic signal and the construction of a new alignment to Red Hill Country Club Drive which will be evenly spaced with existing signals along the corridor. He said the final design of the future improvements along Foothill Boulevard may or may not include a median in the final design. Flexibility has been given on the conditions of approval when it comes to a temporary physical barrier being installed to prevent left -turn movements from the proposed project driveway. • Commissioner Fletcher asked what type of temporary barriers can be installed. two options were discussed, one is pavement delineators which can be glued to the ground or Page 9 of 13 AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA a raised median between 2 or 3 feet in width as not to impact business access to the south of the project (Magic Lamp and Vince's). Commissioner Fletcher noted that it has been a long tirne since the original proposal. He said the design is attractive and is a much better plan. He said with respect to the zoning: he said the facts and findings almost creates the argument that it never should have been mixed use but it is mixed use. He said the Developer listened to residents and incorporated those things into their plan. He said it does have lower density and he likes the live%vork units: a nice City asset. He said the architectural design is very nice and good parking. He said his geological concerns were satisfied and trees can be replaced with more. He said the preservation of Bear Gulch is good. He said he wants the fifth amenity to be • added, perhaps a dog park. Commissioner Wimberly concurred with all of his comments. He said he likes the Live/work units work well provided they are conditioned properly meaning no living in the work part of the unit. He said it needs to be used as a mixed use. He said the architect worked well with staff and he worked with them on DRC -they met all the requirements. He said the project will be an improvement to that part of the City Chairman Oaxaca thanked staff and noted that time has worked in their favor with the addition of the property to the west, there is now a reduction of density and added amenities and architecture. He said the main concerns regarding the slope have been addressed and this is the best possible outcome. He asked staff to clarify the need for the GPA with respect to the Development Code. Mr. Grahn replied that it is to reestablish consistency between the Development Code and the General Plan. Moved by Fletcher seconded by Wimberly carried 3-0-2 (Alfacias. Munoz absent) to adopt the resolutions recommending the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00206 (Resolution No. 17-75) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration which will be forwarded to the City Council for final action and that the Planning Commission adopt the Resolutions approving SUBTT166051vf (Resolution No. 17-76): Design Review DRC2012-00672 (Resolution No. 17-77): Variance DRC2016-00207 (Resolution No. 17- 73) and Tree Removal Permit DRC2012-00673 (Resolution No. 17-79) The motion • included Commission direction for staff to work with the applicant to achieve the addition of a fifth amenity on the project site and they accepter/ the revised standard conditions as Page 10 of 13 P1VV V%a 1 9-J9 AL 1 / HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA placed before them on the dais (specifically Planning Condition #3 and Engineering Condition 414) D8. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2017-00619 — DR HORTON — A request for a Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and DR Horton for the purpose of providing vested development rights and establishing permit thresholds and development timelines related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. The City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration of • environmental impacts for this project on July 19. 2017. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review of a previously adopted Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final review and action. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED. Donald Granger, Senior Planner noted the agreement is still under review and that staff is requesting a continuance to the next meeting on September 13, 2017. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and hearing and seeing no comment asked the Commission for a motion to leave the hearing open to the September 13, 2017 meeting. Mr. Granger said the staff report will have the agreement attached and a summary of the major terms of the agreement and a summary of the background and applicable Code sections that is being recommended to Council. Moved by Wimberly seconded by Fletcher carried 3-0-2 (Macias. Munoz absent) to continue Development Agreement DRC2017-00619 to the regular meeting on September 13, 2017. E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION • INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: None Page 11 of 13 AUGUST 23, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: None F. ADJOURNMENT 9:30 PM I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 17, 2017 seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code • 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. 19111111k The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission Page 12 of 13 I"%V V V V 1 LJI AL 1 I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under 'Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. • All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of S2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 13 of 13