The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2018-08-08 - Agenda Packet - PC-HPC � krr,p i f AUGUST 8, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Macias Vice Chairman Guglielmo Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Oaxaca Commissioner Wimberly B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair,depending upon the number of individual members of the audience.This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of July 25, 2018 C2. Consideration to adopt Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes of July 25, 2018 Page 1 of 5 x AUGUST 8, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. D1 Presentation of a Resolution of Commendation to Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony., All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SIBTT19917 - CASTILLO - A request to subdivide 7,17 acres into 10 dots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Man, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wils41re Drive and Copley Drive; APN: 0226-102-30... Related Files:Variance DRC2018-00566. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative(Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2018-00566 - CASTILLO - A request to increase the wall height up to 23 feet for sound attenuation allong the south boundary and a portion of the east boundary of proposed Tentative Tract 19917 (a request to subdivide 7.17 acres into 10 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan), located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive;, APN: 0226102-30, Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1991T, Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E3. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00606 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- A request to amend Title 17 of the Municipal Code to amend requirements and standards for the development of Accessory Dwelling Units, also referred to as Second Dwelling Units. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Page 2 of 5 it ■-, _ , - � _ !' 1 ' 11�+ 1 . • r- - •■ _ •■- � - •, M, AUGUST 8, 2018 "`� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA COMMISSIONF. I 1 IPRESERVATION PLANNINGI I INTER-AGENCY UPDATES' COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: G. ADjOURNMENT I, Lois J, Schrader, Planning CommissionSecretary i of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certifyt a true, accurate copy of the foregoing enposted August 7 , seventy two ( hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 1050D Civic Center Drive. Lois J,, Schrader Planning i i Secretary City c If you need special)assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meetang will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibiii,ty. IListen¢ng devices are available for the hearing impaired.. Page 4 of 5 AUGUST s, zo1 s HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INFORMATION COMMISSIONTO ADDRESS THE PLANNING The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of viewTo allow all persons to speak, given the length of theagenda, ple se keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker- If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire roup. To encourage all views and promote -urtsy to others, the audience should refrain from lai , booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item, To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center oft the staff table, State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. Afterspeaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address nd the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments aree r lly limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning n item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of theagenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretaryto be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a PlanningCommission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each enda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available, for public inspections during regular business hours" Monday through Thursday, 7.00 , except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the CityClerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,793 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established nd governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meetingis in si . Copies of the PlanningCommission f s and minutes can be found at www.Cilyo Page 5 of 5 Vicinity Historic Preservation and Plannin Commission MeetingAugust 8, 2018 .. t = .... .... E A o+ c 1 �� E a► I v' . 2 j a U 1 Q 3m: Z d .- fn I Ci i M Wll�olrv»onmwsrviouuuu��mmloiu�mw,rvmIIIIIIIII� j a miommnouuu;�WN�ll�l-:YN��YI�IIY��1w7iN01�1»uuim- �,m��m uexwNrrcrvm �Q� :- p�n�immmvmi iVuuuo oumouulG�f,I�IY? Y�' q„,,"„«� IVl»pkTtl)„VNug,1g, � ._. W11111 u u w�mmmmm�m UIIIIIII ', i,fb:"Ov- � I 3ase Line .... o ... ,. . .. Base ine r ' Church �a,� [ w mm �° ��w n �,,,m � Church l .! im o o � thi[E Foot neo. Arrow yd j Arnow Jersey 8th 0 3 j � 4 w _ N P CIS _, 5t CIS h 4t --j 4th E5 & E6 Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Charnben 10600 Civic Center C ri v e E9 & E2: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917 and Variance DRC2018-00566 E3: Municipal Code Amendment—Accessory Dwelling Units—Citywide E4: Municipal Code Amendment—Hotels—Citywide E5 & E6: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20147 and Design Review DRC2017- 00925 tl� rr�loim, f „f JULY 259 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION IIM 11114 1U TIE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. — CALL TO ORDER 7:00 R Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Macias X Vice Chairman Guglielmo —X — Commissioner Munoz X Commissioner Oaxaca X� Commissioner Wimberly _X_ iho al Sta ' `res,E',,nt° indyce i,irnit,„ i,t F„Iannerr Nick Gffi're,N, Assistant City itiorneY; ltwrt E'spinozau As,st City ��,:°ni°ru'�,er; I cis ..,wcha ' r,, Ph.-inning Commission Seir��tary; Dal 7 ran, s. ist�nif B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair,depending upon the number of individual members of the audience.This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,,, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. `c item, Pl...E3 ,for public cormnen1 C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 6 C1-Pg1 JULY 25, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION 11A VIII N iU°"' � �IIIIIIIIIII, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of July 11, 2018 &4oved by Munoz, seconcied by lq"nenbery, carried 5-0 to adopt the nser it CWeind'iar, D. DIRECTOR'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony„ although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. NONE E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. E1, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00889 — KIDDIE ACADEMY — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 10,763 square foot child care facility with outdoor play areas on a vacant site totaling 1 21 acres of land, located in the Village Commercial (VC) District,. Victoria Planned Community, at the southwest corner of Atwood Street and Victoria Park Lane; APN: 1089-581-09. Related fides: Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00890 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2018-00460. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332—In-Fill Development Projects. E2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00890—KIDDIE ACADEMY--A request to establish a proposed 10,763 square foot child care facility with outdoor play areas on a vacant site totaling 1.21 acres of land, located in the Village Commercial (VC) District, Victoria Planned Page 2 of 6 C1—Pg2 p�r�urrr�uurta ,A �a i r JULY 259 201 $ HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION III II IN U"! IIIA RANCHOCCIVIC COUNCIL 10500 CIVICDRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Community, at the southwest corner of Atwood Street and Victoria Park Lane; APN: 1089- 581-09. Related files: Design Review DRC2017-00889 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2018- 00460. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. E3. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2018-00460— KIDDIE ACADEMY—A request to remove 58 trees from an existing vacant site totaling 1.21 acres of land related to the proposed, development of a 10,763 square foot child care facility with outdoor play areas, located in the Village Commercial (VC) District, Victoria Planned Community, at the southwest corner of Atwood Street and Victoria Park Lane; APN: 1089-581-09. Related files: Design Review DRC2017-00889 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00890. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. Dat,, Assistant Ranner;a gave� the ,staff report and Power-Poi'rl presentation (ccP)l on file),, t...te 17oted two corm°rrur�picatior � from the putrtic and coi.ri .s were(..,� ptai(.:°e,r;tbefr.::r:u tt'ie C,o,r'F7 i�:Na,tC,)r7e,rs o,n thie dais, Commissioner Oaxaca asked staff to address the qu,estions raised in the erniait cc.rresporrdence received. t,,,/e asked about thrr breakdown n ofage gror.,q)s p,,.:rstings for the i::rroject. a,t .f. an responded the applicant could answer the questionabout the a,gie groiups, Fo,r the ,po�mtings, 11w ra er noti herr°i�ng ras ,.rdwe�rt�r"� �ed �w�r t�h�e nersi."p:,,�° cesw,er,e raide,d r:ru,t rrieilghhiorh,00d rneetin,rt, notices were mailed out, arW there was a totail of three postir°gs on ,,„rite,, ad n,e6",4ii7g tegat regi...rirements. ('11and YC le Burn :ptt stated that they that the postings or°r sih,,, werp sti'tt at the location. Jennifer Moore, rawr°esenting the applicant, addressed .the con erns raised d3,l RoY fwtierrrmn. She sta,ted while th,�,, school being two;-stoned is not common, it is aitoived, and they have r:()Oe extensive research as to how to make it work wsuccessfutty. .,777 number of staff and ,parking spacers is correct, they did the catcrriatiorrs, accordinirit'o es,t,irnates and they wi,tt t i,.:R e ,inove,.rrrage of parking spaicc:,& ,A�d(.Hti,onatty, thic, frees that they will be ren aving are smatter trees that are bioc ing the fi,,,r:rnt,age of the site and siame ,frees will be removedbecause they will be ate atabffl �r.,�d after ,the grading to rneet ADA guidelines is done,, 71.I��ry h dll be planting a varr'ety cif tr eles which will be useid for edt.jcifatr'onifat,prirpioses. C'h,airr an Macias asked the applicant if the were actual or prr,rject(.°:d. Page 3 of 6 C1—Pg3 „ ?r�i it/J r JULY 25, 2015 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION IIIII�VIII VIII r'll i'''''U RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Jn°annillbr, Adoor re^spormy��ro��d, that the nurnbers are Galit�om is will not let enroffirnerit occur CM7"3171'„ 5i(Mer Oaxaca asked W,411�01 Aad„m:; Moore stated that the C ahklrnO '113tate ficelrlsirl prociess isvery �strict, and mrmq,),da�cfor's cos„dr e t'hldw.oughlo ut ttle plrd d ess to eaasaaa'e they are habhf�owfing all up� �gulnnatn"on s (Y�tairinlg to rallios olf students to fe,@lcher� and'' „(aumadsraaaalaaa sizes. Obe..Ch adaama°asar) Q�gilel'mo asked about itt'affiC t'l' nada and raauP-maff lmacalfmans a lin-slte,, ,Ms. Ai400 e rphed th atthis jS dq jGj,t a ftadalamanal sdmahooll and parents 161fiddl ble pla rking an dl n,fvalking thiel students in I""h�er is 011m11to�n e e�ntraanim e lbir d. aawaa"aana^aa"'a Ai aac a°as i pa".irje ff,N,"?piubkc hearing, � l�q , "ermi � 768 7a.a� aahFlSS if 1.1nite'Dad�va, S&rji lf'31e�y?,ard1h°N ,� rVpwaSeaatnhg I"�'fg, i Ralsien Rppeffiles,, awims and btfitc s Aon fessori sch olal„s, stEl tedl Iks ca°and"paean„ans abaaaa mf the Kiddip A,caideuwn,y prjbicl, k le s latle d hio is clonic med c y� „ ia case, oaf am�na�a m„�� ad��mdma� ��u�tuatd`m�a�a��s F�l �aa�' o tasted' hue ��srag�e��,u� �a��uMaa�°� �� ,`� �a�aaaa� �a �aa"aa"� dam ��Va�'a�a., �aa�d,, � �i�aaaa� d��a�iY i Nod"pith thestaffing to shy lid enl N"ati�os, anhd pad*ing e„'time s te s for its"die pV'"qjecit he thinks rniol��r'e staftimalf ble needl�ed and gy, aaaoae parking Vaces Laaluaatly'b taxa nig„ clon,cerrliad about ttaad a"eaa"of aat of thle treaa s and 'daae,~n? be,Vtay,a,am a'aa' Ghaaramaa�n, A ai0s, amlo�s sed the piubifi�c hearing ter sleing no a�d'(litaaarNl ailtaimap°di,��aiaan,.„ . Caaunaaai ssiaaaaa*r 6A,tamaaRa° w aaotaam ' sifaaff oma a�onh�m t,te ,satc,ity,t'ssbi,e,s ,wie,�,eaiddressed tmdrxe in n"" Design Review in dwa 'a,iat;;aa'a"'action Noaa'a'tih iother departments, Dal Tt aman a`aaaal&'B ,E? ftaa t it was , aam�ass��a �r a"a�� a� � �� m�� n �a � R� �R �� s �� ,oro as g aold and this proj6irf was a"aefn the dat d,a"a'u�paanid for aahit tarea Moved by t aaaxama�a„ seconded by, Ka°imLa eel carried 5...0 to a~aa o.t the Ra"a0tn:atta:ad°a„aa, approving Reoa:.aaa C.a:ad mfi'ttoa"aiait Pernik, Page 4 of 6 C1—Pg4 r l k i JULY 25, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Il l IIS 'i "] IIID RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER-AGENCY UPDATES: IPIi;;;;;; COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: OE G. ADJOURNMENT 7':35 13 M The Commission adjourned to a workshop held in the Rains Room to discuss Pre- Application Review DRC2018-00198— The New Home Company. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 19, 2018 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. 4.9 Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. Page 5 of 6 C1-Pg5 �a I 11 t J u LY 25, 2018 `°` HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION IIID VIII'IIID Ji"T' ° CIVICRANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CALIFORNIARANCHO CUCAMONGA, The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item„ To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone, After s eakln , please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to, Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual'. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY F STAFF Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Plannibg Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, These documents are available for public inspections during re utar business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7;00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,793 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagershit the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commissionagendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at w.Cit ofC.us. Page 6 of 6 C1—Pg6 JULY 2018 7 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP Wir ri RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA . TAO 113M I II: Chairman cis X Vice Chairman Guglielmo X Commissioner Munoz X Commissioner Oaxaca X Commissioner i berly „ X Additional Staff Present.° GandYce Biomed, (®it lIannr,r; lbeit ,Spinoa, Asst. ogibeier; it,,,,oi Schrader, F::I hanning ommiw� Coin secretary; fiat 7'�an, Assistant f::;Iiar°mei.,, Pisan 1>hiaker, Aidmin ss sitr nt B. PUBLIC OM UNIC TIONS This is the time and place forte general public to address I in Commission any item listed or not listed on the agenda. to law prohibits the Commission from r sinany issue not previouslyincluded on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony e the matter for a subsequent meeting, Comments re to be limited five minutes per individual or less, as deemednecessary Chair,depending upon the number of individual e r f the audience.This is a professional business a tin courtesy and decorumr ted. Please refrain t audiencebetween speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activityimight be disruptive e r meeting. C. Discussm ITEMS PLANNING COMMISSION C1 PRE-APPLICATION REVI 1 -w001 —THE NEW HOME COMPANY —A request for re-Application Review of 135 for sale condominium units on 5.25 acres of land within Planning Area S-20 in the Village Neighborhood (VN) District of the Empire Lakes Specific and within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, PlanningArea 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/ClevelandAvenues„ The specific location of the project site is north of 4th Street on the west side of the future alignment of Page 1 of 5 C2—Pgl Y a� r Ilii'� JULY 25� 201 $ PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOPIIIA IIIA IIID ' 'illll"'11111E %' RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER CIVIC10500 CALIFORNIARANCHO CUCAMONGA� The Resort Parkway. Related files: General Plan Amendment 01 -00114, Specific Plan Amendment 02015-00040, and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20073. f nd7'abe van �D °dvd dXu df , Associate ta" '"dr, gave the staN 'rdUodf. „ n.t ddedtlot idddd'tfd dn.eN fddeddN dtdadfy o�n� t� 'dtdd'ddt�f iV�m o fife):, and nok f �t�f �� " ttd oveitbui1fdn form, i fl , unsti dof what matd to adto support the ddrItddmmi �d �m ' d�, �tfd � ddterpr tmtdin t tdsaid bicaus of the kick, f detelat erste staff redo" ndtf ppitkadtconsidercha,inthe fdodr He amdtrfdfdfdnd thet tdaffddfatfd� � tcamtndre oio�t� ��yfo incorporate ffmtidnat mm tdataanldfegreternerg, a� "�fi �te to that sit t fe eiCirni'men' f rdiore variations of temdifdfua4dthe bdmtfdmts w0tir? the, deioprnnfhie sffratef a more rrmde'rn rirs: Ni tf .rnaoukt atow tbir oirr? Play with whi st�itd tdand shape t frysaid the f'e � n shiauld emphasizevvalkiiAla �n�� P�t t�� firn �� t "�� a� �t and to creat. t��f 0ftd" f)aice area fm"d"dNmd ma� hl t Ena"�!ttih°"eier itN^N�'o n�"d�'f"di�id�°M;'aw�'eta t�Nw��'�� and da"dni Nde M a� M � n f�� id�ml,,it id (hie ffandf a af�r*�a�"""�rchit ut�ffo thins, fade^N�t. f...t tat 'd thio f"f�"nu�N� Hoii Goii�nt �d 'y p d�mdfedf thlem�mdsd�tves odwd their aNMchit'ectd,dNi st,yling. Fle said'they could d haidit dm the dfdasi n to ble, � Mori dmldnt�h�ut Nmmfrsdtan'tto fntddfdd dt , i ddt' m, f to ftdMornet tlngfdt tsaid they NddMropen to ddffdtdns from ft Commissioners indsifeif. h4r, Bianchi further stated, that they i exc id°Fn'd tno beiof a t�uro)"Bl i with at) r:�:'tr t �Na��M�i' ,pirir. point in Ranchoted ca'mnr,)iidn C lrwmn issionie Oaxaca sitafed archin n,,tur should tea-ive truth in sii and is comfortable Innftr the prgect t efdmd more contern Wndmm'm"' mn idesn Commissioner Wirniberly said he dfod°sn:`t see, the 360-diegree architecture in the dfe, dgn, which is reliquired i the Development Code. i� siIoind'r Adeno sitaf��°df he filo s the st'y°/e and articulation to the back k andmi' the t�lajI imth dd�dfor . t-e said�that w ��ddn d � f u s � �, � n t � � �a t f � �u fddds.d�td°td°m t fd�dd�'d� to �m.a°�d�da� dd�t tf�d� d~N�'u�dw m�oti amt�td�. °d�f ttmd� d�i�d u�t� r�m that its d.d�d�d��d��dmmt ftu�N��dd tui "S tdm d"�:�fmd'd�dmdd: . Guglietimio sitateld that hie f'tke�s a lot of the d-fl'µ„ irtfd.'m eiledw ientu , ,dduch nada, the decks anid radings, but questioned some dd f theym'nd`nrmatr , d°"' ds said is ddd:�nad"mfbrt�dt td�� N ith the design but dt��d��sn t see fade �' fdl�dd ish anid u°rr�g frd twit ttmday : d ornirrd"�� mgn t ife tdfdd�^'dd ff�d��'� transition to fd�dbn �"µ tdm,dt a a dm .d�m"dd�md"«d�N". � dadd�md' tm �f�mfi d�', �a.td� �µ. � .md'dd�ddN"�dn d"drdntd:nf� t.�tdd�dit M. d°dmnNt � � d d�dd �d df fdd�d'�"d'.� the nha;,dm iremd"menta, to n"dmmtde it�"'�"��'ire e�a'd.ntuAM,d'm"Nljl'."ora'�'ry, Page 2 of 5 C2—Pg2 I r uo uuu ��'�rj it//i0 JULY 25, 2018 � PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP I�f IIS °"I"1111 II RAINS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ('" ,177missioner° Munoz co?Tlfflented sure there i'scona(..'mWity in thecomn,'w ackno ledad the s,e lot of opport�. ni"l ir° the r�°s � hg,��,��ce�!:� Commissioner i"s°�,,i�;��°ger ��axaca �,��.ri�,. '" � % Oaxaca �« � ' ictor.i�:� � '.ardens cis r) example fi"nten„^stir�g i,,�se of gat/7sTOg spaces and st,igges, ?d t reµ a,:Ppli'cant to create diffi.',renl expertences to srx.s r , people to traavei round, Mr. Bianchi was tars(.;, Imre to otenti. .. � �, a;�i��ci°r� �r, ir� ii�� m�s�r"�r:rii ' ,�;i� r"r to be rnr"'(,:. contem x.)n,,iry in style. oinrni°ssi6nersi averail gave general p:r,)sitive fr,� , idbar k bo i the direction ofthe prgj�,:&st and &(Iwsed iir r,r) to c.Mornrnii to a r.lesi n style, DJ URN NT 3:30 111110 I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning CommissionSecretary f the Cityc r my designee, r certify t e, accurate copy of the foregoingos July 19, 21 eve ( hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Lois c r Planning Comi iSecretary City of Rancho Page 3 o r rG rnrr r -^ Nr 17 JULY 259 2018 , PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP iviuc 1111111 w CIVICRAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 CIVIC I RANCHO CUCAMONGA2 CALIFORNIA INFORMATION FORTHF PUBLICFORT TO ADDRFSS T/IE PLANNING ION The PlIa nruuung Commisslern encourages free iexpresskern of all points of vpew, To aVow all persons to speak, given the kerngttn of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief If refiners have already expressed your position, you may som pn y ln6cate that you agree with as previous speaker, if.:,ippropriate, a spokesperson arson may present the views of yOUr entire group, `lora encourage all views and promote courtesy to runners, the audience slnratukct refrain from clapping, booing or shOWS of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning ComnrliSSioni on any agenda k-terry. To address the Planning Comm iission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table.. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone- ffter spea kl ncgo please sign in on the ekkpboard located meat to the speaker's podium. pt:is important to list your name, address and the agenda Rernn letter your comments refer to. Cornmernts are generally limited to r minutes per individual. _.. r6 you need spy pap assiStancaa or accommodations to IpaurUct pirate in tlfd o rnneedri ,please cotaact wane Narnn"nprng Dr,ppau'turrnerwt:at(909)X37"'7 '7�7 aka, PIratdA� atpauru ref 48 ho uu.s 1prirar to tl,re ii'ne a,,In �rri l rrruaWe the City to make reaasrurmt.A arrangements to ensure aacces�Wllity. L pterning de%ces are, arrarfllla*for tpur:hu warp ng rirrupaaur d_ Page 4 of 5 C2—Pg4 , W JULY 2018 7 PLANNINGISS! WORKSHOPMuqu RAINS ROOM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC i RANCHO CUCAMONGA9 CALIFORNIA If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda„ you may dna so under "Public comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda.. ,Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Pianning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such mate6a'Is shm..ald allso be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record.. All requests for items to be played on a Pianning Comrnisshoin agenda must be in writing, Requests for scheduling agenda ilea's wilt be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director, AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive„ Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, These documents are available for pub"lc inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday„ 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS ,Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,793 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please tura off all cellular phones and pagers white the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found atit of C®use Page s , STAFF REPORT August , 201 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVETRACT SUBTT19917- CASTILLO-A requestto subdivide 7.17 acres into 10 lots in the Very Lo (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plana located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley rive; : 0226-102-30. Related Files: Variance C2 13®0 566. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE C 1 05 6 CA ILL s A request to increase the wall height up to 23 feet for soup attenuation along the south boundary and a portion of the east boundary o proposed Tentative Tract 19917 (a request to subdivide 7.17 acres into 10 lots in the Very Lo (VL) Residential District of the Efiwanda Specific Plan), located north of the 210Freeway n east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire rive and Copley rive; : 0226-102-30. elated Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917. Staff has prepared a MitigatedNegative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration forteproject; and • Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917 and Variance 2 1 through adoption of the attached Resolutions with Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND:PROJECT REVIEW The proposed project was originally scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on March 1 urin circulation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Na aive Declaration ( 1 ) for that meeting the City received comments from the n Bernardino County Department of Public Works ( C ) and the California Department of Fishand Wildlife ( F ), Both agencies raised questions that required further environmental study, and the revision and recirculation of the IS/MND, whichs revised significantly from its original version. The March 9, 2016staff report (Exhibit ) recommended the Planning o iio continue t e applications to an unspecified h Commission accepted this recommendation n continued lic tion accordingly. E1—E2 Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION s,rAFF REPORT SUBTT19917 AND VAR DRC201,8-00566 – CASTILLO August 8, 201 a Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The proposed project is located directly north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210), south of Tract 18708(a 7a-lots ivisi n), east of Tract 18122(a 76-lot subdivision curare fly under construction), and west of East Etiwanda Creek and the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin (Exhibit B), The overall site is 7.17 acres, with an east-west dimension of approximately 330 feet and a north- south dimension of approximately 940 feet. The site is adjacent to existing vacant, residential, and utility corridor land uses tothe north, south, east, and west as indicated inthe fol[ wing table. Land Use General Plan Zoning..,7 . ... ......... ............... Very Low (VL) Residential Site Vacant Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda ................. ............... .....................,§p�ecifi�Plan ,........................................... Very Low(VL) Residential North Single-family residences Very Low Residential District of the Et1wanda §.p,22ffic Plan 210 Freeway and single- Low(L) i�e s i di—ential" South Low family residences Residentiai District of the Etiwanda ............................_............ East Etiwanda Creek and the Flood Control/Ut[Ifty Open Space (OS) Corridor East San Sevaine Flood Control Residential District of the Basin Efiwanda S cific Plan ..................-........................ .........................................................Pq Vacant nd Single-family Very Low(VL) Residential West residences Very Low Residential'; District of the Etiwanda ecific Plan ANALYSIS: A. Tentative Tract!lap_a9B!112L11: The proposed project involves the subdivision of a 7.17 acre parcel into 10 lots for future residential development (Exhibit C). Develop me nt1cons tru ction of the homes following the subdivision of the property will be by others, as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so themselves. The project site is located within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP), which permits a maximum of 2 dwelling its per acre, with an average lot size of 25,000 square feet, and a minimum net lot size of 20,000 square feet. Lots within the subdivision range in size from 23,276 square feet to 26,557 square feet,with an average lot size of 25,078 square feet, is slightly exceeds the required 25,000 square foot minimum average lot size. The project density will be 1.77 dwelling units per acre. The depth of each lot will be at least 200 feet, and the width of each lot will meet the required 90-foot dimension, All of the lots wift be conventional, i.e. rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting, Access to the proposed subdivision will occur through the extension of two streets (Copley Drive and Wilshire Drive)from within the subdivision to the west. The project complies with all applicable development standards as described in Figure 5-2 of the ESP and the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. As the subject property is located within the Equestrian Overlay, each lot will have a dedicated corral area of 12 feet by 48 feet for horse-keeping, and equestrian trails will be provided along the rear of each lot per Section 5.25.500 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, E1–E2 Pig2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT1 9917 AND VAR DRC2018-00566 — CASTILLO Pau gcast 8, 2018 Page 3 B. Variance DRC2018-00566: The applicant submitted a Variance to allow the construction of noise attenuating walls along the south, and portions of the east perimeter of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height (Exhibit D). Noise attenuation walls are identified as the principal means for mitigating noise impacts generated by traffic on the Foothill Freeway (SR-210), according to the of study prepared by Eilar Associates on May 31, 2018. Section 17.48.050(C) of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code identifies that the maximum height of walls permitted in residential districts is 6 feet. The proposed walls will be approximately 12 to 13.7 feet above the pad elevations of the lots adjoining the walls as seen from the interior of the subdivision. Depending on the location, some walls will be constructed over retaining walls, i.e. a combination wall. Therefore, as seen from the outside the subdivision, the overall height of the walls will appear greater. The general area where the walls will be highest is near the southeast corner of the subdivision at Lot 10 where the wall, as seen from the freeway, will be approximately 23 feet high. The findings of facts below support the necessary Variance findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives ofthis Code. Fact: The proposed all are for noise attenuation purposes to reduce the exterior noise levels at the lots along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision. The height of the walls is necessary to mitigate the noise impacts to a level that is less than 65 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) as specified in the Development Code. If the walls were limited to 6 feet as specified in the Code, or if the walls were absent altogether, the exterior noise levels would not comply with the Code, nor be consistent with Public Health and Safety policies relating to noise (Goal PS-13 of the General Plan). There is no practical alternative to Its that will achieve the desired noise attenuation. Finding: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved ort the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Fact: The project site is located approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-21 0). As a result, it is exposed to noise generated by traffic that is generally not present near other residential properties in the City that are screened by existing development and/or sufficiently distant from these principal noise sources that noise impacts are negligible. Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact: The purpose of the walls is to attenuate traffic noise. The exterior noise levels generated by traffic exceed the maximum limits established by the Development Code and out negatively affect a future homeowner's ability to enjoy and use the outdoor areas of their property in the absence ofthese walls. Furthermore, the effectiveness of noise attenuating materials used in the construction of the homes is augmented by the presence E1—E2 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT19917 AND VAR DR020100566 — CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page 4 of the noise attenuating perimeter all. The absence of the wall would reduce the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures and expose the occupants of the homes to elevated interior noise. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact- Throughout the City, the Foothill Freeway(SR-21,0) corridor is adjacent to numerous residential properties. Traffic noise impacts along the corridor must be mitigated to levels as described in the Development Code and consistent with the General Plan. The freeway corridor abuts various residential zoning districts including the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Walls of this height or similar are common along the freeway corridor for noise attenuation purposes her residential properties are adjacent tot freeway, Finding. The granting of the Variance witl not be detrimental tote public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties orimprovements in the vicinity. Fact: The height of the waft as seen from the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) will be similar to the height of other noise attenuation walls along the freeway corridor Within the City. This wall will be constructed per the decorative design established by Caltrans, consistent with the design of the existing sound attenuation all to the east and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties orimprovements in the vicinity. C. NeigthLbogrthqopod M _M2gling: One neighborhood meeting was held to obtain input and comments from the owners ofthe strrounding properties within 660 feet of the site. The meeting was held at Summit Intermediate Sshoot located at 5959 East Avenue on November 17, 2015. No members of the public attended the scheduled neighborhood meeting and no public comments were submitted in advance of the meeting. D. Des'[on Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) reviewed the project on August 4, 2015 and recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission, As the project does not include the construction of houses, the architecture of the houses for this subdivision will be subject to review and action by the Committee and the Planning Commission at a later to following the submittal of a Design Review application. E, Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on August 4, 2015 and recommended approval oft proposed subdivision tot Planning Commission. F., Trails Advisor v Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project on September 9, 2015 and recommended approval of the proposed subdivision tote Planning Commission. G. Tribal Consultation: As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians, Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, GabrielenofTongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, San Manual Band of Mission Indians, and Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians fol[owing a completeness E 1--E2 Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT1 9917 AND VAR C2018- 56 — CASTILL O August8, 2018 Page 5 determination for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917. The notices were mailed on September 10, 2015 and provided for a 3 a comment period ending on October 12, 2015. No response to the Tribal Consultation Request was received. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study(IS)of the potential environmental effects of the project (Exhibit H). Based on the findings contained in that IS, it staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse as Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment, Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice ofthe public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. As noted above, an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was circulated prior to the Planning Commission public hearing on March 9, 2016. The City received comments from the an Bernardino County Department of Public Works (SBCDPW) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). of agencies raised questions that required further environmental study, and the revision and recirculation of the IS/MND. The IS/MND was revised significantly as requested and now also includes revised discussion and additional mitigations related to noise impacts. No additional comments have been received in response tothis recirculated environmental document. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City, The proposed development will increase the value oft e project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees.These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police® parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current it Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and its policies related to serving local needs and promoting complementary development. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments were received in response to these notifications. El—E2 Pg5 PLANNING I I N STAFF REPORT SUBTT19917 AND VAR DR 2018-0056 — CASTILLO August 8, 2016 Fags EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 9@ 2016° Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C Tentative Tract Map Exhibit D d Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit E Preliminary Vater Quality Management Flan Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action dated August 4e 2015 Exhibit Gm Trails Advisory Committee Action dated September 9, 2015 Exhibit H Initial Study (Parts t, ll & III) Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTTI 9917 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DR 2016-00566 :T /ss E1—E2 Pg6 STAFF REPoRT PIANNING DrIP,kRi,mi!71XF DATE: March 9, 2016 RANCHO TO. Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCANIONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: To Gra n, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT1 9917 - SHAREEF AWAD - A request to subdMde 7.17 acres into 10 lots iin the Very Low (VL) Residential District oft Etiwanda Specific Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive; APN: 0226-102-30. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration, RECOMMENDATION. Staff respectfully recommends a continuance of the hearing for this item to an unspecified date BACKGROUND, On February 3, 2016, staff citstributed the environmental documents with the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. The circulation of these documents allows for public review and comment. On March 3, 2016, a letter was received from the Environmental Management Division of the Department of Public Works for the County of San Bernardino. Several issues were raised that need to be addressed by staff and following that, the documents will then be re-circulated, The item will also be re-advertised- Therefore, staff respectfully requests the item Shown as Item C of the agenda be continued to an unspecified date. Respectfull ubmitted, r............ C �......... Candyce Burnett Planning Director CBITG/ls EXHIBIT A E 1—E2 Pg7 s - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 19917 _` a AA momo _ I Lou vv -_ e v B 8 _ - ? / [ A _ - . Hl— €° 'E � � was �'.- Lot ra IV 1 .o-- e 4--"'t - - _ � WO 1,V s x � CFrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AL - AGE PLAN, 5 . MWIA sowgDcm 3 u - �- mow � ^, `— - E tri�r r� -- _ , I ITT - =- SE nGN B-B Sl SECTXM -C i- 'f C OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SECTCU--— -- D `a SES AND CROSS—SE ;NS W Sd 'T- ..-. . TENTATIVE TRACT _ AP 1099-17 =V- Q : _. . s TIN UWP' ' , - s �r -eta Ao And m 15.7 go _j t -_ zl tom• e € - k _ € t € cr - Ell TY � may Own L 01 Onmin F ._ �' CUT OC A 4 _ ENTITIA € _ 4 g ® - — — a - - € THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION ANCHO CUCAMONGAAUGUST 4 00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Rains 10500 Civic t Rancho Cucamonga, California 1. CALL TO ORDER � 7,00p,nn, FRollCall Regular /embers Richard Fletcher x Francisco axaca.., ,. Staft attiond nre andyce Burnett....�... Donald Granger x Alternates ay Wimberly Frances o dys elk Lou Munoz The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited o 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review ommittee acts as an advisory Committee tote Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. TENTATIVETRACT MAP SUBTT18960 — WILSON ESTATES, LLC ® The A SUSTT18960 subdivision of 4.36 acres into 12 residential lots in the Low ( ) Residential C ��n��d�'�'��'e District of the Etiwanda Forth Specific Plan located on the north side of Wilson ra onunended Avenue,west of Efiwanda Avenue,at the southwest corneof Altura Drive and 64)J..:PrON al, TetasCourt; A e 1087-261-12. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE T MAP R,, (JENT19�917 SUBTT19917 - SHAREEF AWAD m A request to subdivide 7.17 o?"rniftrecornmen acresded into 10 lots in the Very L (VL) Residential District of the al,),aroval,EXHIBIT F . 1 f 1 4", .. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 4, 2015 PJC�k� CUCAMONGA Etiwanda ifi Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue t the easterlyi of Wilshire Drive Copley i 0226-102-30. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State la prohibits the Committee from addressing any feeds not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and sat the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. IV. ADJOURNMENT :17 ,.at The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that sat an 11:00 p.m. adjournment tf ae tf items go beyond that time,they shall be herd only with the consent of the Committee. 1, Lola Schrader, Planning Commission ecretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 23, 2015, at least 72 hours prier to the meeting per Government Coda Section 54954.2 at 10500 ivic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 2f2 E1- P1 DESIGN REVIEW 7:20 p.m. TOM GRAHN August 4, 2015 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT" MAP SUBTT19917 m SHAREEE request to subdivide 7.17 acres into 10 lots in the Very Low(VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly xte sio of Wilshire Drive and Copley rive® 022610230. esign Parameters: The proposed proj ct is located directly north of the 210 Freeway, south o Tract 18708 (a plotsubdivision), east of Tract 1 122 -lot subdivision currently under construction), and west of East Etiwanda Creekthe San Sevaineto onol Basin. Access to the proposed subdivision will occur through o streets on the project site to the west. Lots within the subdivision a e in size from square feet to 26,557 square feet, with an average lot size of 25,078 sure feet. These lot sues exceed of e 20,000 square foot minimum lot size and 25,000 i i u average lot size requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The ro ose subdivision is all other alice 1e development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Staff Comments: ai r Iss es: The following si issues wiil be this focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. There are no major design issues. Secondary Issues. Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary si n issues. 1, There are nosecondary desi Issues. f c Imp _Is ues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the r ject design without discussion: 1. No policy issues have been identified. Staff c e i n- Staff recommends the Committee recommend rv t of Tentative Tract SUBTT199117, De ign Review iAction. Staff far: r: Members Present; E1—E2 P 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RANCHO ACTION AGENDA CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 1. CALL To ORDER Roll Call 6,00 p in Ray Wimberly_2�_ Lou Munoz X Richard Fletcher (Alternate) Janet Ryerson X Victoria Jones X Vacant (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian) A Tom Tisler(Bicycle) Mike it ( t Corr Coordinator) Additional Staff Present: To Grahn, Associate Planner 11. ANNOUNCEMENTS A. RESIGNATION OF COMMITTEE MEMBER JIM HANSEN. EXHIBIT G 1 of 2 EII—E2 Pg17 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEEACTION AGENDA Ho CUCAMONGA September 9, 2015 111. TOWS RE PORTS B. ENVIRONMENTAlASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SU TT19.917..... T'"T19 17 HA FF A —A r uestto u dlvi 7,17 acres into ��a rrt sce �, 1 lot in t V Low (V Residential District oft Etiwanda Specific 'd to Flan, located north of the 21 Freeway and east o East Avenue t the revir,ru �l subject ct rsw��i;��iora,�lra project easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and play Drive;APP-.- 0226-102-30., pran pnw"to Related File. CEQA Review i A2014-00023. .schoduling the sR.rbdeviskm for ...... .. ...... l�arming �T S = ® ' ........ � 1ar __...........................®..V........_�__ . _...._m:.__._._.....__..__...__._..._.,,.._....M.._�.......�.S...... .. t his,is the time and plane for the general public to addre ss the committee,, Items to be di.scaa,s. ed here are those that do raot already appear on t irro agenda, 6,30 p,m. 1, lois J. Schrader, Phpnning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or arty designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 2, 2015, at least 72 hours pnor to the meeting per Government .'We Sectibn 54964.2 at '10500 Citic Center thrive, Rancho Cucamonga, it U of 2 E1—E2 P 1 September 9, 2015 Trails Committee Action SUBTT19917 The Committee recommended approval of the project, subject tothe following revisions being made to the project plans prior to scheduling the subdivision for Planning Commission consideration- 1. Revise the width of the Community Trail along north project boundary adjacent to Lots 1 thru 3 include thea stalla io of the remaining 8-foot width oft e Community Trail, which will complete the 20-foot wide Community Trail. 2. Identify the location of future block walls adjacent tothe locale uestrian trails (Lots 1, 4 to 7, and 8 to 10j® and identify the location of gated access tate rear of each lot. These walls should be designed to include 3 feet of masonry wall and 3 feet of wrought iron on top. 3. The size of the future horse corral locations should be revised from a dimension of 30 feet by 50 feet to either a minimum dimension of 12 feet by 48 feet, or 24 feet by 24 feet. The location of each future horse corral shall be revised to meet the required 70-foot minimum setback for the keeping of animals. The 70-foot setback is measured from the horse corral to the primary residential structure on adjacent properties. 4. Revise the location of the graded slope and future horse corral locations on Lots 1 to 3 so that the horse corral is located between the Community Trail and the to oft a slope,and on Lots 8 thru 10 the horse corral is located between the local equestrian trail and the toe ofthe slope. S. Provide a 20-foot by 30-foot vehicle turn-around in the locale ues ri n trail along the west side of Lot 1. Meeting began at ®0 p.m. Committee Member sent® Carol Douglass to attendance:To Gran Public attendance., Larry Henderson Adjournment:6:30 E1—E2 Pg19 u~'rir�t-Frrn VI RONMENTAL LAI INFORMATION FORM (Part i - Initial Study) CUCAMONGA RANCHO (please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab Trey to move from one line to the swat lease.) ,kinmrrg Depadment �909y 477•'2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed rj ctso that the Cityi to City is , i and Guidelines; California QualitytRules8 and Procedures to Implement . It is important that the informationin i application i sfull. Upon review I Initial application, additional i limited t ,traffic, l i t i I, i geological r it r application ita complete unlessidentified i t studiesireports are submittedreview complete and adequate. The project application ill not be scheduledr Committees' review unless all required i complete r staff to prepare the Initial Study Part 11 as required . In additionto the filing , the applicant ill be responsible r reimburse the Cits is and/or consultantsI costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. Fn "��&�PLd��FIOdVSU1flLLftlO7B�l�F#�C� L3. �1�� rla�#®Fh�lIti�th�r�s��rl rtaiti8ycafth� ��il��rift��trsrra�llrl�t on is ccartplete at the tirrpa cf stabanittal; Crtg+staff vpill not�0 available to par(® crlt ra ttir d t�provide arsisslrr information Application Al tuber for the project to which Eters form pertains: !Project Title; TENTATIVE ACT MAP NO. 19917 Name&Addre.3s of project ourrtar(s): SHAREEF A A 1239 NORTH CACTUS AVENUE, ET .. RIALTO,CA. 92376 Name&Aoldress of developer orproject sponsor SAME AS `OWNER" Updated 4/1112013 Page i of 10 EXHIBIT H E1- 2 2 Contact Person Address; SHAREEF AWAD 1231 N. CACTUS AVENUE, STS. D RIALTO, CA. 92376 Warne &Address of person preparing this form(if different from above) SARIS AS"ABOVE" Telephone Number- 909 519-1355 i Informations indicated by ars asterisk()is not required of non-construction CUPs unless otherwise requested by staff. 'I) Provide a Baty,scala(6m 1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries, 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, apse and gest; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from Phe site, Include a wrap showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe). Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary) APP: 0226-102-30 '5) Gross Site Area(acr'sq.ft): 312,180 S.F. '6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public sfreets&proposed 245,5711 S,F.. dedications); 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach add'i'tional sheat if necessary) N/A Updated 4111!7013 Page 2 of 10 —E2 Pg2l .............—. ............—1...................................... 8) lncludoa,deprjtian of all pen vits whh-li m(iff 1.,pe necessary fron P tipe CUY of Rado Cucamonga wid other gov!;'.lmmwUW Fipgencies wr order to fully implement the prc)jbctl� N/A .................................... ................ ............................ .................................. .................. ....................... ............................I............................. ....................................................................................................................... ................... ........................................................... ,D) nescf be the phy,.;ical of the Me as d w(osts beforn the t.,wrqect including rnfonnathon on Wography, SO slaWity, p0nlS 2rhd anV7,31% n7aturew trffeK.., Pads and mads, dr-,,iinage courises and ajejr,:mc�.s De apps any e%xisYe..lg sh"Uctums i,rn sete(includingaille and conrMson)and the use offhe slrur,�4�e' Ares Attarh photographsof sige-Wic w�(baftim: S qJp,!;;0lbed. kp acIdition,cirte,-.Osources of informaticirl 0 e, geologhcal and/or hydivlogic studres, bibitic,and ard-peobgicat Survey ,traffic shidles) THERE ARE WD EXISTING STRft,JCTUF;�,E(')NS�I"E, THE TOFI(XYZAPI W (.'.)F TU IE SITE IS F�AT M40, ()FRW114S 111ORTIA TO THE SOIJT�L THEF?,E ARI::.::�. r40 EXIST114G TREES INSITE, THER ARI!:-:::: NO EXISTIP4G ...................... Al'4IMIALS ON SIMI:-- T1 qERE U'3 140 SCEP41C ASPECT OF THE PRQJEC-F' .......................... ............................... ......................... ......................... ....................................................................--...................... .................................. ....................................... .............................. ..................................................................... .......................... ............................... ........... ......................... ................. ......................... ........................................ ......................... .......................... ...................... ......................... ................ ........................ .................................................. .............. .......................... ................... .................... .......................... ...................................... Updated 411112013 Page 3 of 10 El-E2 Pg22 P0) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): THERE ARE NO CULTURAL OR HISTORICAL ASPECTS OF THE SITE, 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: FREEWAY 210 NOISE MAY AFFECT THE PROPOSED USE 12) Describe the proposed project in detail This should provide an adequate descnption of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment, Attach additional sheets)if necessary: SUBDIV00N OF EXISTING ONE PARCEL INTO 10 LOTS 13) Descfibe the suffoundingproperties,includirkq information on plants and animals and any cultural, hisloncal, orscenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(rosidan tial,commercial,etr,),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops,department stores, etc.)and scale of development(heigilt, frontage, setback,rear yard, etc) PROPERTY TO THE EAST IS FLOOD COOT ROL, 7'0 THE SOUTH IS FREEWAY 210, TO THE WEST IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION TRACT HOMES. TO THE NORT11 IS A SINGLE FAMIL:Y RESIDENTIAL THERE ARE NO ANIMALS, PLANTS, CULTURAL, OR SCENIC ASPECTS OF THE SITE. Updated 411112013 Page 4 of 10 EI—E2 E23 14) Will the Proposedpr9jerf change tl7e patlery;, scc J, or ctaara .................... Cterotilles�irmundrnggetrerdlafr,,aofatepeoject? NO ........................... ...................................................... ............................................................—................. ........... .................. .................. ........................-.................... ....................................................................... 1ndi(.;a1&the type of short-tem?and for g-temp noise to be generated,including source and amotrnL Hex VAlhr,'��Fw noese levels affect adjacent properties and w1-,sill uses? Mat methods of sour)dpM0fjrjg are proposeO WA ....................... .................................. .................. ............................. .................................... *16) Indicate proposed rernovals anwor replacements of mature or scenir trees B�,)/A ................. ................................................... .................... ....................................... ....................................................... ................... 17) MdcaPe any bodies of wak.w(incfu6n,g domestic water supplier)gV4,1 which the Me dm en S: NIA .......................... ................... ............................. ................. ................ .................. 18) Indicate expected amount of water'Fisage (,'.7ee Attachment A for uswge eshmates). For feather clafifiration, please f..'xintact the Curamonga Valley Water D,istnct at(909) 98.7-259 1, a Rpsidendal(galldayp 705 Peak use(gallDay) 705 b CommerciallMd. (qafldaylaq) N/A Peak use(gallmrnlac) NIA ................................. 19) InOrate proposed method of sewage ,disposal SopUd Tank r Sewer 11septir.;tanks am proposed, attach percolation tests, If disrharge to a sandarysewn age, s tam is proposed indicate generabon, (gee Mae.:.,hment A for usag�:.�agunales) Fnr further clarification,please f,'.,onlarl the expected dally sewage v-P Cucamonga VaNey Water District at(909)957®2'59'1 a RP-,.,.;?,"dentiaf(f �aflday) b CnmmerciaVindustdal(.qaYdaylaq) ......... U�ida ted V 1112013 Page 5 of 10 El—E2 Pg24 RESIDENTIAL TS 20) Number of residential units: Detached(indicale range of parcel sizes, miniiaaum lot sizes and maxim Um lot laze N/A 191arhect(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): — __________ 21) Anticipated range of safe peices andlorranas Sete Pracea(s) $NIA to S Rent(per month) $ __to 22) Specify number of bedrooms by and type _____ —------ 2 y Frar`a'cate erali ppated household size by and type NIA 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who MY be residing within the project. Contact the appmpnale School Districts as shown in Attachment S: e Elementary,- NIA NIA b. .l¢rra¢i�r f-ligh,. c Senior High NIA COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 5) Describe type of uses?and major function(s)of commercial industnal or instetutronal uses: 'IA Updated 41't'U2013 Page 6 of 10 El—E2 P25 2 Total floor area of cummercial,indusIdal,or instttubonal uses by type NIA 27) Indiimte hours of operation: NIA 28) Number of employees TOW, N/A Mavmum ShiftNIA Time of Maximum Shift NIA 29) Provide breakdown ofanticopatediob classifications,Orluding wage and salary ranges,as well as an indicabon of the rate of hire for each classifiration(attach aftlional sheet if trecessary): NIA. 30) EsUrnation of the numberof workers go be hired that Currently reside w the City. '31) Forcommercialar?dIlTdustrizil uses 01;1.Yl indicate the source, type, and amounfafa#rpogution empssioris. (Data should be verffiNl ffirough the South Coast Air Quahty Management Dislnrl,at(BIB)572 626.1)- NIA ALL PROJECTS 32) Haire the water,seveer,fire,and flood control agencies sennng the project been Gontacted to datermi(M Ulaie-abifity t0 provide adpquafe servire to the Proposed pr9ject7 ff so,please wdicate their response. NO OpOalad 411 U201 3 P'lge 7 01f$0 IE 1-E2 Pg26 3 ) In the known history ofthis properly, has them been any use, storage, or dischwge of hazardous aradlor toxic rrrakenals Fxarroples of ha,rardbus amllrar toxic rroalerlais include, but are not limited to PCBs,sa radioactive sul:ostarrces,pesticides and herbicides fuels,oils,solvents, and other flarroraaable liquids and gase, Also mote underground storage of ra,yofthe above, Please list the materials and describe Meir use, storage, aradlor dischaarge on hese praaperty, as well as the dales of nese, it krar,.zwn, 3.4.) Will the proposed Parol"ecl involve the temporw y orton -term use,star as-0 or discharge of hal rdous�andlortoxic n7aelrem'.k s, inrlrrdirr,g but not limiled to those examples listed above? It,yes,provrcle ars invenloay of all such rnaterials to bre used and proposed method sof disposa t The loraetion ref scar„h uses, atong with the storage and shipment areas,shad be shown and labeled on the application plans. N 35) rhe applicant shall be required to pay,any applicable Fish and Game fee 'f`ha3 pro est pParararer°will crarafdrm which fee S- aappt'y tr)Ihh;2I praject, .til checlr s are to be made pa,yabfrm to the Clerk oaf the Board r,rpervisoora„aced srabmitted tra Planning, l"crnmissiconl lannin Directorhearih : I hereby certify That the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and intofmation required for adRS'quaale evat'raalion of this project to the best ofrny ability,that the facts,,staleriwnts,and iraformatinn presented are tare and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief i further kinderstand ll`rat adddional inrormation may be requirei.1 to bP!a submitled before are ade,agehale evaluation can tae made by the City of Rancho Q.irarr onga .................. >rcraatllrr �°�B ATTACHMENT ®@ @@ T RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATERLDEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February2 3) Water Usa_e Sin >,te-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood ommercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professionalli 973 gal/day/unit(tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 175 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flaws Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Ir°ustitt.�ti nal/Government Industrial Park 30 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 18 3 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering ater Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Upd,.ted 4,11 R7013 Page D of U.1 E1—E2 Pg28 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees, Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.0, ®x 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 966®3511 11.10 ated Q 11120 t 3 Pac le WOW El—E2 Pg29 d, City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONM y^ C ... NTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART 11 Zz BACKGROUND I. Project File: Tentative Tract Map Sll TTp19917 2, Related Piles: N/ 3 Description ofProject: A request to, subdivide 7,17 acres into 10 lots in the Try Low (VL) Residential District of the Etrwana Specific Plan located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive, 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: Bob Castilla Castle Development 539 W, Walnut Avenue Rialto, CA 92376 5. General Plan Designation: Very Low Residential 6m Zoning: Very Lave(VQ Residential District of the Efiwainda Specific Plan 7e Surrounding an ses and Setting,. The proposed project is located directly north of the 210 freeway, south of Tract 16709 (a 7-lot subdivision), east of Tract 13122 (a 76-lot subdivision currently under construction), and west of East Etiwanda Creek, and the San Sevaine Fled Control Basin. Access to the proposed subdivision will occur through two (2) streets on the project site to the west. The overall site is 7,17 acres,with an east-west dimension of approximately 330 feet and a north-south dimension of approximately 940 feet. 6a Lead Agency Name and Address, City of Rancho Cucamonga Ptanning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucarnonga, CA 91730 9< Contact Person and Phone Nurnberg. Torn Grahn, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department (909) 774®4312 10, Other agencies whose aP roval,pis required: None. GLOSSARY®-The following abbreviations are used in this report; PALE —California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District Et _Environmental, Impact Report FEI R—Final Environmental Impact Report FP I a Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—rational Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx Nitrogen Oxides ROG— Reactive Organic uses E'®E2 P 30 Initial Study for SCJ 19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 PMio- Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB-Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAB-South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages icmmm� (V)Aesthetics Agricultural Resources (V)Air Quality (V) Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology& Soils (V) Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards&Waste Materials Hydrology &Water Quality Land Use & Planning Mineral Resources Noise ) Population & Housing Public Services ) Recreation Transportation/Traffic Tribal Cultural Resources Mandatory Findings of 1 )Utilities & Service ' stems Sionificance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EI R or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR o-r-NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed u the p oposed pro'ect, nothing further is required. Prepared By: f Date: Reviewed By: Date: Rev 4-17 El-E2 Pg3l Initial Study for SUBM 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga ........................................... .................. Page 3 ........................ . ..........................-",-.................................................... ............ ................................ .................„m, ................................................................................ ............ .............. sgnihcam 045 Pc�em,any VAI Pain Issues and Supporting Information Source& fktgab'." I gn q�'= ...... ............... ................. ................... .!!2 T12 pact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ............... ........................................................................................................................................................................ ................................ .................... ....... ...... ................. 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project�' a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? H ... ........................................._"..................,,,...,,._...____m......,......................................... ............. - ................................................. .......... b) Substanfially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppingsll and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? ............................... -....w.._........ ........................ .............................. ............................. ............ ................................... ......... C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? ............... ....... .......... I.I.I..I....................I.,.............. ........- d Create a new source of substantial light or glare,which woUld adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? ...................................... _-.11111111........... ............................................................-............'............................. ..................................................... _.-............................................. ..........J Comments, a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor accorftg to General Plan Figure LU-6 Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated, b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, east of East Avenue, at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gypsum Drive and Raindrop Place and is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north, a tract of single-family homes under construction to the west, the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east, and the 210 Freeway tothe south, The proposed project is similar in scale and massing as the existing single-family housing to the north and west and the visual quality of the area will not be degraded as a result of this project. Design review and incorporation of established design guidelines is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No, 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution There, no adverse impacts are anticipated, d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures require compliance with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E 1- Pg32 Initial Study for SUBM 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Less Than &gnficant Less pwantaly wal Thall n Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signh;anl Miligabon Sgrlzam Ng 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,, or (V) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the lossofforest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment„ronment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? J Comments: a The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance, The proposed project is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, east of East Avenue, at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gypsum Drive and Raindrop Place and is characterized by existing single- family homes to the north, a tract of single-family homes under construction to the west, the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east, and the 210 Freeway to the south. The project proposes the subdivision of 7,17 acres into 10 single-family lots. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres,, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore,, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan, The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council, The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 El—E2 Pg33 Initial Study for SUB 19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page - ................. """"" ... ,,,,, ................ ....... m , Than SI 111 h%Ora 111015 Mari Issues and Supporting Information Sources,,, Sgintl:c��ni: &M,gaavY11 �,,,rmfic��nnl Nia ,.-,.... ...�.�,..... ..- -m .. puua,�'mr a &i ua u u AgIXIIX"AIXtl '_N'_'e C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga zoned as forest land or timberland No impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use, Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland, No impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non- forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland,or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, east of East Avenue, at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gypsum Drive and Raindrop Place and is characterized by existing single-family hones to the north, a tract of single-family homes under construction to the west, the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east, and the 210 Freeway to the south Furthermore, there are no lands wilhin the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land and therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-fewest use. Therefore., no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would th�r, r(.,)j ,..,. . mm . ... �„ ��.� � �yecf: �a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the . b .. m applicable am�r quality plain? � Violate any fair quality standar � .. contribute . e �. .F." rd or c®rntribute ( } (�} { } � } substantially to an existing or, projected air quality I violation? rcq)...w._ suit inia pollutant cumulatively considerable h t .. ..net increase of M mm" rv, ..,,. any project gran is non attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? -.. .........m. ..... .�.......... ...� m.......mm ......... ............-.-l. m..............-. ......a.- � ��....� �.., � d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant (V) concentrations? - ........._,,,,,,,,,Create objectionable odors.....-affect 1n ....... .........._.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, „ .............I. ................ .................., } substantial � �� number of people? ,. „, _ ......_.. ,�,��m„ . e.. ... Comments: a} As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AOMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP), Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of Cakfornia and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards ( QS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SCI coarse Rev 4,47 Ei—E2 Pg34 Initial Study for SUBTT191 it of Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 teras Than S p:Jmficant 11!ess PORMAlly With Tian Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PA:qation 5a gn&ftani: NQ particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (P ,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2 5) microns in diameter, and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMo and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride, and visibility reducing particles, These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD), The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources, Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a all, and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area, Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine,and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation, The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with to wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding the relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter ori microns or less (13Mw), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM25) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (S02), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the A. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the asin®s compliance with the FCAA, The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PMio and PM2 S. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook, The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality and Greenhouse as Impact Analysis (Giroux&Associates, March 2015, updated December 2017) was prepared that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse as Emissions. Rev 4-17 E1E2 Pg35 Initial Study fore.SUBTT'1 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 — �._--------- .... " i0.".�9.uu..� .. -11,,,,,,,--1,,,,,,,,,,l-l- -1,11",,-..---......",.,.,".-'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll""I'll",'ll""I'll,'ll""I'll""I'll'.1I.I.."."",.,--,""IlI � ill ,m Issues and SIipporting Information So�r�e�' .gl ell ii�up M� dc:�ro%' .,.,., ,n n. vrfl , .. .... Vleu"u wa;9t Short Term (Construction . Protect Emissions and IM acts The project proposes the subdivision of 7.17 acres into 10 single-family lots ranging in size from 23,276 square feet to 25,557 square feet, with an average lot size of 25,078 square feet. These lot sizes exceed both the 20,000 square foot minimum lot size and 25,1000 minimum net average lot size requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Summary cf Peak Construction Emissions (onsluttction AcliAhi Einksions o , Ma�:,t�min lhi i Emissions (p I ds!dav) arttstruction 110c; :�,(1x coo! VNI ,$1l t et,��s,awtt� b m �Iu1x ls�'�,at, nffii � Pifm X11 , � �41 1@u9 6w "5 tit,tt 1rea I e, 20 S 14 i �� , 6l 0 5-i Q,o I 1io i5 I+�ir � Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOLS, Oxo Stix„ P ,o and PWs and are expected from the following construction activities: grading (including soil importlexport), and paving (curb, gutter, and flatwork). Localized Slinnifkm:ance Surnmg in Pounds Per Clan .I'S1 _and t®towlest Ft�at �tw®t t�( amt�ttak t1�r p ��°5at�� a t„ .rt, , . � �tttat��rs CO � '�i�� ['il l�� PM-2.5its din I Valle Max Allowable 011-site IN 4 3 Einkslons I tin,uut tied i I � 1 E �[rtt th�ul14 21 4 ui rent(E�hauwsts and f�eilated ot�structton�c#ivities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles® asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions, however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any threshold of significance. Fugitive dust Fugitive dust emssYons are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations, Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depericilng on the level of activity, the specific Rev 417 —E2 Pg36 Initial Study for SUBTT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 LessThan SqR Peon; Less pmenta(Y YPA 71 Ran Issues and Supporting Information Sources SQmftani W:gawn &VOlificwt No IM33ad 12aaLmPnrut9 _L110-ad _.L1 3��l operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Arch itec1ggLgqqjjpgj Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 11.6 lbs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction, Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed, No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated toemit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not on the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultrarnafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultrarnafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) identified in the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis (Giroux & Adssociates® March 2015, updated December 2017) as mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less-than-significant: 1) All clearing,grading,earth-moving,or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved rasa disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3)times it during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon,and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site area are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative cs® Shom Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute tote pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga Rev ® 7 1®E Pg37 Initial Study for Sly T"1 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 � .w . ..,,, .,.., ._�._ .._:........... �c�u°muq:ir�nY 'i IL,r�w� IIS e c oi�au'Isr VIM Thin,Is Issues aro d Supporting Information Sources sruu ass RRI 01iM �a, wbnn Rva� , �� .... ...�_o,�„��,.„..„,..„,�. �.�,m�„�,,,,,,,�,.,�,� savmvai:�u.M �nwiro n�rtmi� 6nn�mn 7 Iluvni t area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, ori-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles,, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generatedduring grading and construction activities. While most oft e durst would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles wouid remain in the atmosphere, increasing article levels within the surrounding areaCo struct on is an on-going indust in the Rancho Cucamonga area, Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site unkil their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report ( I ) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions ModeI ( S7 ) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan(FP i ), Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2),Ozone( ,3), and ParVculate Matter (PM25 and PM,o) would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance;, therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level fess®than®si ni ice t. This city-wide increase in emissions was Identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Cc sideraUons was ultirrsate'ly adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR, Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis (Giroux & Associates, March 2015, updated December 2017)„ no short-term, operational impacts wound occur as a result of the project Because the project would result 'in minimalemissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also consiclered minimaL With implementation of the following best practices an mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-terra air quality impacts, the projects contribriflon to cumulative impacts will e less-than-significant 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational eissi sm The contractor sall ensure that all construction equipment, is being properlyserviced ai taine as per manufacturers's ecific ti nus® Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior tote issuance of any gradingpermits, the developer shall submit construction planus tote City denotinge proposed schedule ar jecte equipment see Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission o ile construction equipment ill be utilized, or that their use as investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction meas res imposed a South Coast Air Quality a a e e t District(SCas well as City Planningto } The construction contractor sail utilize electric or clean alternative fuel poweredequipment ere feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-gra ding parts include a statement that work crews ill shut off equipment ert not in use. 3) All asphalt sall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. Rev 4-17 E1—E2 Pg38 Initial Study for SUBTTl7 it of Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Than Sigmfiii:ant III frilss V%th 11 Ihp n Issues and Supporting Information Sources iignftainll kfifigaUon S lipficani! tip All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings all be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors all include the following provisions: a Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. a Pave orapply gravel to any on-site haul roads. 0 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. a Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. 0 Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. a Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried overt adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-Inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or of suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or of soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PlI emissions. ProiectLIgnal I Rual'09REpEragtii2opnAa� Emissions allAjfflpacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions, The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parkinrear hown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project Rev 4-17 E 1— Pg39 Initial Study for SIJ BTT1 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Leas Than S gnificant toss PatbnCaHy Wth Than Isst)es and Supporting Information Sources: &gnpfcanl PAI-gaton Sgnfflrant No Lt4r eaflafad :-, iMEa_ S9� act u mm Dail% f)peraliqmal Impacts ROG. No % (f) s n., IINI-11) IM 2.5 tits -ki 1) 110 0,( 400 1) m 1 7 Z 6 110 417 1B-1 )2 0 33 r 0 9_591 d1 .i 1.11 1.475.3 N11) 111r,•aiutltId 75 150 I;o 5 Kk",.J, 1111C,11�pld, "'tD Nto \it A®e NA Cumulative Inn acts (!-orl i Term/Ooerational Ernissl2ns I The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potentlap impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less-than-significant level, This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR used on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis (Giroux & Associates, March 2015, updated December 2017), no long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered min�mal. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-terra® operational air quality impacts,, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less-than- significant: 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 16) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 17) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR(Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as Rev 4-17 El—E2 Pg40 Initial Study for SIJ BTT1 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 1 IN N S 1311%ficaM L ass �a�enta;4y Wth Itan Issues and Supporting Information Sources: i "�grufic2ni MIN-,Wtan sign,fic= Na a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Conslderafions was ultimately adopted by the City Council, With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FA IR, which are designed to minimize long-term,, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less-than-significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SO I0 identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 114 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in AQ 10 Rule 1401. The project site is located within % mile of a sensitive receptor. There are existing residences immediately west and adjacent to the project site; however, as the proposed project is a single family residential development, it will not generate toxic air contaminants. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less-than-significant levels. 18) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast it Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions Of PM25 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.em fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use includ'ing diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly, Operational odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from the proposed single-family residential use would most likely be from activities such as cooking; however,these odors would be minimal and not considered to be significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or V) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies,or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U,S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or (10 other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? Rev 4-17 1- 2i' 1 Initial Study for SU TT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 1 .. �. ,.m _m .. ... L is'Thya ...... .. _ �I'5gru fic°,aniLass r Sou � u r ully 4 flh Yllrwn is uses and ��upportling Information Sr�'urce's'�. .. ,.. .. .„,. ,. �.. .. _......., ,,. m,.. . .. Ha ve ..a ..substantial adverse ...,.. 11 effect on federal) rotected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to,, marsh, i vernal pool, coastal, etc,) through direct removal, filling, l g interruption, or other means? hydrological in.. R„,a��_ ..._ .. �.�,.,...,„�..... . d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( } ( � 0,j � (V) resident or rinigratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ti protecting biological resources, such as a tree reservationlic or ordinance'? p y ... p p f) conflict with �..� �n, .�,,,,,, .,.,,,,.,,,,,,,rrm. m he provisions of an adopted Habitat �� O,,...�,„ ( � � �� ( ) Conservation Flan, Natural Community conservation Marti, or other approved local, regional, or Mate habitat conservation plan Comments: a) The project site is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, east of East Avenue„ at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gypsum Drive and Raindrop dace and is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north„ a tract of single-family homes under construction to the west, the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east, and the 210 Freeway to the south. The project proposes the subdivision of 717 acres into 10 siin le-farridy lots. The site has been disrupted can approximately 3.2 acres of the project site by unpermitted gradirig and site clearing According to t'he General Flan Figure RC-4, and Section 4,10 of the General Plan FPElR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources- the Coastal California Griatcatcheir( N), the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), Coastal Sage Chaparral Scrub (LSCS), and iversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (R FSS) In February 2016 the City previously circulated an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for this proposed residential development The City received comments from the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works (SBCDP ) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (C®FW) in March 2016. Comments from the SBCDP ! indicated the need for further analysis in the areas of hydrology„ nesting birds„ SBKR, gnatcatcher, burrowing owl,, Plummer's Mariposa Lily, riparian habitat, high fire hazard areas, impacts to surrounding properties, and appropriately addressing project mitigation measures, Comments from the CDFW requested further analysis relative to the SBKR,. Nesting Birds and Migratory Bird -treaty Act, habitat conservation„ and the Plumrners Mariposa Lily Mitigation Man. These comment letters were provided to the applicant and were used as the basis for the updated Biological Resources Assessment (L&L Environmental, Inc., November 2017). ,according to the Biological Resources Survey Report (Scheidt, February 2015) updated y the Biological Resources Assessment (L&L Environmental, Inc., November 2017), the survey area consists of heavily disturbed lands and native Prunus iiicifoiia Shrublan Alliance(PISA)habitat. Habitat on-sitelis transitional and although a portion of the site was previously identified as alluvial fan sage scrub (Lepido,spartum squamatum Shru 'ian Alliance (LSSA)) the vegetation onsite does not meet the criteria for this habitat. No Rev 4917 E1-E2 P 42 Initial Study for SUBTT11 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less TINYI S 9rvrc wo Lass potent]Wly Wah Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources- Sgmfxant 11agahan I Sgndicail N M-11 1- riparian, wetland, vernal pool drainage or other jurisdictional feature was observed onsite. The 2017 San Bernarnardino kangaroo rat (SBKR)(Dipodomys merriami parvus) presence/absence survey was negative No sensitive botanical species were observed or were determined to have a moderate or high potential of occurring after completion of the botanical survey. No burrowing owls or burrows were observed during surveys-, however, two sensitive or special status species were observe coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum) and San Diego pocket mouse (Chaetodipus fAlla x fallax), No federally listed threatened or endangered species were observed or will beimpacted by the proposed development, Rlversidtag.All vial Fan Saoe Scrub ESA SSI RIver sidcan Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (ISA SS) is listed by the California Natural Diversity Database(CNDDB)as a sensitive and declining habitat RAFSS is a unique type of coastal sage scrub vegetation that is common on alluvial fans and flood lairs in southern California. This habitat was correctly identified in the previous Biological Resources Assessment (Scheidt, February 2015) under the nomenclature precedent in that document. The accepted components of the RASS vegetation community are maintained by infrequent but severe flooding where streams have deposited sandy, rocky alluvium Riparian banks lack enough permanent water to establish and maintain riparian woodlands. However, in thea sence of flooding riparian drought deciduous sub-shrubs, large evergreen woody shrubs, and trees such as sycamore will begin to establish- This plant community is adapted to porous, low fertility substrate, periodic flooding, and erosion. Various successional "tiers" are apparent within this community that are related to the distance from the flood channel and the period of time since the last flood event, A different nomenclature, the Manual of California Vegetation, is now being used as the standard for habitat descriptions by the California Department of is and Wildlife(CDFW) and is therefore used here. RASS is identified in the Manual of California Vegetation nomenclature as LSSA, Under the membership rule forte LSSA classification, scale broom (Lepidospartum squamaturn) must occupy greater than one percent"> 1 % cover in alluvial environments". Scale broom is perennial evergreen species and would have been identified during surveys if present onsite, Scale broom was not identified onsite. Habitat on-site is a mature community that lacks any sign of recent flooding, debris rafts, erosional banks or channels. It has been severed from its flood regime source by flood control projects constructed by an Bernardino County, East Etiwanda Creek has been channelized and the water that once flowed on the alluvial slopes in a braided pattern has been interrupted by levies and dams that concentrated that flow into the channel. As a result, this RSS community has by the definition of the Manual of California Vegetation® converted to the surrounding upland chaparral habitat type PISA. Plummer's arioo Lill � The Plummer's Mariposa Lilly (Calochortus plurnmerae) was not observed over the two- year survey period covered by this report and was not observed during previous surveys. The species does not occupy the project area at this time. San Bernardino Kgnggfgg_M The primary habitat for SBKR is primary and secondary alluvial fan sage scrub habitats with sandy soils deposited by fluvial processes, SBKR prefers washes, but may also occur Rev 4-17 El—E2 Pg43 Initial Study for SU 19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga ........ .................... Page 1 .,�. �.,.............................................. Ti grid.Iar"�tLgR%Lrw '�'��il Issues and Supporting Information Sources° &:�irt�ka�nl �,�fl�iga;,rc)n r�0......................... .................... ' I� sdI P.........vi ...... in lower densities In adjacent chaparral, This species excavates burros in loose sails rear the base of bushes, The survey area is (located in mapped critical habitat for SBKR, Habitat on-site was previously identified (Scheidt„ February 2015) as alluvial fan sage scrub and is located in the historic alluvial fan of Etiwanda Creek Due to construction of the Etiwanda Channel and other developments, the site has converted to a chaparral community. Because the site was historically suitable habitat and is located in critical habitat a focused SBKR presence/absence survey was conducted by Shay Lawrey of Jericho Systems Inc. The updated Biological Resources Assessment (L&L Environmental, Inc,, November 2017) rdentfies the detailed trapping methods and results. The 2017 SBKR presence/absence trapping survey was negative. Earlier reports assumed occupation by SBKR. The findings of this trapping study change the status of previous recommendations for ha itat'Ioss mitigation, The Endangered Species Act(ESA)does not require habitat loss mitigation in the absence of the listed species„ even though the habitat lies within the boundary of a federally designated Critical Habitat area. The CDFW comment fetter received by the City in March 2016 recommended that a qualified and permitted biologist conduct focused trapping surveys in coordination with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US S) protocolli these trapping studies were completed for the preparation of the updated Biological Resources Assessment (L&L Environmental, Inc., November 2017), which were negative, Additionally, the CDFW recommended that the City revise the MND to include a neer mitigation measure to ensure that he project minimizes potential Impacts to SBKR, The mitigation measure should require that focused trapping surveys following USFWS protocol the conducted by a permitted biologist, and that the USFWS be consulited for incidental take permitting if SBKR are found on-site, prior to issuance of a grading permit. 1) Within 30 stays prior to the initiation of groundbreaking ac'tiv'ity, perforin a focused trapping survey for the Sari Bernardino kangaroo rat (SBKR) following the United States Fish and Wildlife Service( S S) protocol. The SBKR focused trapping survey shall be conducted by a permitted biologist, and the USFWS shall be consulted for incidental take permlitking if SBKR are found on-site urrowin Owl/ estin Bird A burrowing owl habitat assessment was conducted on April 28, 2016., The habitat assessment was performed to determine the survey area's suitability to support burrowing owl. Key indicators of suitability include presence of low-growing vegetation within grassland,desert, and scrubland's, smalll fossorial mammals and their associated burrows, and isolated features such as cement, mood debris piles, and/or cement culverts, All of these indicators were observed in the survey area and buffer, as a result, a more focused burrow survey was conducted. During the second site visit on May 11® 2016„ a thorough burrow survey was conducted in the survey area and the buffer zone to determine if suitable burrows to support burrowing owl were present. Surveys consisted of slowly walking the site and the 150-meter buffer zone. All existing fossorial ,mammal barrows were thoroughly examined for size and suitability as well' as evidence of burrowing owl, including molted feathers, prey remains„ Rev -17 El -E2 Initial Study for SUBM 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 S�grii iii E r;an I Less PotenliaPy MIMI Than Issues and Supporting Informanon Sources: significWt KW,ga�Jon Sign.ficam NO cast pellets, eggshell fragments, and excrement. Burrows were examined incidentally during the remaining visits to verify no changes over the course of stiq gdies Although no suitable burrows for burrowing owl were observed on the subject property, this species is migratory and rodent activity onsite is evident, therefore, a 30-day preconstruction clearance survey is recommended before construction. If burrowing owl is identified in the impact area or buffer zone during the preconstruction clearance survey, mitigation measures wHI prevent impacts to burrowing owls. Additionally, habitat suitable for migratory bird nesting is present within the survey area Mitigation measures are recommended, including avoidance of vegetation clearing or grubbing during the nesting season to prevent impacts to raptors and migratory birds, If clearing and grubbing cannot be avoided during the nesting season mitigation measures require that a nesting bird survey be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to vegetation clearing or ground disturbing activities. If active nests are located during preconstruction surveys, a qualified biologist will deveiop and implement a plan to avoid nests and minimize and prevent imparAs to nesting birds. 2) Three days prior tothe removal of vegetation or ground-disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either(a)the adult its have not begun egg-laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions,then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary"no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has compIto d its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left tenest, construction in the area may resume. 3) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of is and Wildlife to Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: • Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW to Report. Results of the pre-construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre-construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to Rev 4-17 E 1— Pg45 liriitial Study for ,SUB'11 1119917 it of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 .............................. ...................................................................................................................I........................................ ..................................... ...................... ...................................... ........................................................................................................................................................ ............................................... sqndxaM .58 bear a� VCh .s and Supl:,.iioiftiirhg iriformation Sioii..uces, 40 ls s iu e ................. �E ................................ .................................... 6pav ncaj�r,,�Eed gn:J�taM ............. ............ avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the esting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for ret 30 days after the pre-construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non-breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non-migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre-construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion andfor closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February I through August 31, if nests are discovered,they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 4) A qualified biologist shall monitor clearing and grubbing activities as they impact vegetation onsite. A qualified biologist shall inspect debris piles, pipes, burrows, vegetation, leaf litter piles, and other potential refugia for sensitive wildlife species prior to initiation of clearing,grubbing, grading, or any other Project activity that may injure or kill sensitive wildlife species. If wildlife is discovered,the qualified biologist shall move it out of harm's way or allow it to move safely out of the work area prior to initiation of Project activities. Potential day roosts for pallid bat(e.g.,caves,crevices, mines, hollow trees, buildings, etc.) shall be inspected by a qualified bat biologist prior to initial ground disturbance. If bats are roosting, a bat exclusion plan shall be prepared and submitted to CDFW for review prior to impacts. If a colony is discovered during the breeding season (March-October), the biologist shall determine appropriate avoidance measures, including, but not limited to sound walls, buffers, and Project phasing/timing to prevent disturbance to the colony until all young are weaned and capable of foraging independently. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities and no riparian habitat exists on-site Furthermore, the project site is surrounded by existing single-family homes to the north, a tract of sin gIe-fa mily homes under construction tothe west, the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east, and the 210 Freeway to the south as described in 4.a above, As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site, Furthermore, the project site is surrounded by existing sin gle-fa mrty homes to the north, a tract of single-family homes under construction to the west, the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east, and the 210 Freeway to the south as described in 4.a above. Additionally, the Jurisdictional Delineation (Kinsinger, IRev 4-17 E1—E2 Pg46 Initial Study for SUBTT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Less Than sgnoicant Less pc%antaltV Win Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sgnificant M,tqwran S!gnificara NO I Impast -1milart June 2015) determined that there is no surface connection to Etiwanda Creek by first or zero order channels and the subsurface groundwater connection to Etiwanda Creek has been disrupted by the concrete channel that captures all of the flow from Etiwanda Creek above the site. The project site is isolated from the hydrology of Edwanda Creek and would provide no"beneficial uses"such as filtering or transport of organic nutrients to other water bodies, does not qualify as a US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) wetland or non- wetland water of the US(WOUS), and that there are no hydrologic resources on the project site or within a 100-foot buffer around the site to delineate, As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources, d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large,contiguous natural open space areas, Wildlife potentially may move through the northtsouth trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. The project site is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, and east of East Avenue, at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gypsum Drive and Raindrop Place and is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north, a tract of single- family homes under construction to the west, the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east, and the 210 Freeway to the south. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated, a) There are approximately 6 immature California sycamore (Platanus racemose) trees on- site; none of these 6 trees meet Development Code criteria to be considered a Heritage Tree, The Development Code defines heritage trees as all eucalyptus windrows, any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20")or more, a multi-trunk having a diameter of thirty inches(30")or more, a stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival, and any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant because of age, size, condition, or aesthetic qualities, The 6 sycamore trees are located in the northern portion of the project site, are all under 15 feet in height, and all conflict with proposed improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area, The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance V) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance V) of an archeological resource pursuant to§ 15064.5? c Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred V) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2-24 (Historic Preservation), A Cultural Rev 4-17 E I—E2 Pg47 Initial Study for SUBTT1 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga .......... ..................................... Page 19 .................................................................................. ........................................................................... .... .. . ...................... ....... .................................. S gmfmara Lwis POWIM't'a4 Wdh ln Issues and Supporfing Informatk.)n Sources, !S 9rd'Ca"R Lftgp�,Dr� lgqwfiran6 No ............ ...............111-1-1-—------------.................................... .................................................... .............................................',2zR mmI!=E., -" ........... Resources Survey Report (Laguna Mountain Environmental,, Inc, October 2015„ updated March 2010 was prepared for the project site and did not identify any cultural!; resources within the project area The update to the Cultural Resources Survey Report identified that at least 19 cultural investigations have been documented within a 1/2-mile radius of the project area. Eight resources have been recorded as a result of these investigations and consist of 7 historicage resources and 1 prehistoric isolated stone flake The historic resources are 2 residences,, 1 strw,ture and associate refuse, historic walls and landscaping, and 3 refuse scatters. Based on the updated records search, 4 new studies have occurred in the project vicinity since the initial records search, One ofthese is the Cultural Resources Survey Report for, this subclivision, the other 3 studies old not provide additional information related to the project, and did not result in the identification of new resources. No additional cultural resources have been recorded in the vicinity of the project since the initial survey and records search in 2015 Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated, b) "f"' ere are n® now archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4,6) Construction activity, particularly grading,, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources, The General Plan Fna[ Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented�� 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to to appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: 0 Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the it to establish its archaeological value. 0 Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. 0 Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area® a Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil,planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within Rev 4-17 El—E2 Pg48 Initial Study for SUBTT1 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 li�iss I III han SIF g6ficant 1� Less PlAinita TV 6114M I Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: M lqlWion 9 giNiftan1l: Nq the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FPEI R (Section 4,,6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence, including the project site,, however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources, The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "'Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented� 2) It any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, tot appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, tot site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor oft a find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in ter report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). its report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by grading and surrounding development. The site has been previously disrupted during unpermitted grading, the construction of surrounding infrastructure and surrounding developments, and annual discing for weed abatement, No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050 5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Pub4c Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no Rev 4-17 El—E2 Pg49 Iriffial Study for 19 °I7 City of Rancho CLica monga Page 21 Issues and Supporting information Source&� Ilufl NO ........... .............. ............................ . ...... .............................................................................................................................. ............................... ........................................... 2. mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS, Would the prqje(1-, a) lExpose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving," ................................................................ ................................. ...... ...................................................... ...... i Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as V) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. .............................................. ................. ....................................................................... .............. i0) Strong seismic ground shaking? ............ .................. ii�i) Seismic related ground faRurel, including (V) liquefaction? ..................................................... ...................................................... ............................................................. ................................................. ............................................................. .. .... ............................ iv) Landslides? ................... ......................................... .. .................................................................................. .................................................... .......... b) Result in subst,antiaI sod erosion or the loss of topsoil? (.0 ......................................'_"-_ C) Be located ..................................................... .. ..........................................................................................................................................— .............................................. ........................... on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project,, and potentially result in an- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? ............. ...................................................._................................................. .................................................................................... ................ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-5 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? ..... ................................................................................................... ...... ........................................... _"r......✓....... e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ........................................__ .............................................................. --------_.-I........................ Comments: a No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it inthe Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4,7 of the General Plan FIPEIR. The Red Hill Fault (and Etiwanda Avenue Fault Scarp), passes within 1.0 mile northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approti matety 2.0 miles north, These faults are both capablie of produ6ng My,6.0-7 0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is about 16 miles northeasterly ofthe site and the an Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8 2 earthquakes, is about 18 miles northeasterly oft a site. Each ofthese faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.74 of the General, Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana in conditions during September to April,which generates blowing sand Rev 4-17 1—E Pg5O Initial Study for SUBTT11 it of Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Pmn &gnifC3,11 I es3 potentially WO Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant blitigatirri Sigilifil C1 and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads® buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1 The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the it to reduce PMo emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMo emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more tareduce PM1O emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 47) indicates that there is a potential forte hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FR Exhibit 47-2. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy and (SpC) Soil association according to General Plan FR Exhibit 4.743. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Soboba Stony Loamy Sand (SpC) Soil association according to General Plan FR Exhibit 4,7-3, These soils are typically found at the northern section of the City and consist of light grayish-brown stony loamy sand on the surface, about 10 inches thick,with underlying material of brown very stony loamy sand and very pale brown stony sand about 60 inches thick. With adherence to standard building techniques in accordance with the building code, no adverse impacts are anticipated, e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed, No adverse impacts are anticipated, Rev 4-17 El—E2 Pg5l Initial Study for SU 19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga ........................................... a 2 .........................................................................................................._...................................................................................,,,,,............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. . l. .m �, ae wYr Th.and Supporting Information Sources . V......... —....... M"...... ..»..... ,.,,,,,. ....,.� ......m ......... ...........................................� ........ ..L.. ,,.:... .............m .... ......................_.................................................................................................................w..... .............................................. ......................................».............................................._.. ................................ 7. GREENHOUSE GASE ISSt ould the prgject° a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either dire�::atly or ( M ( � indirectly, that may have a significant impact �on the environment? ....................................... ..................................... .o..........................................,........................................M........................................................................................................................................................................� ..,,.............................................,,�................................... ............................... ....,.,,........_.................................................................,,.. nflict with an applicable plan„ policy or regulation ( � ( � (�� ( ) adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? .........................................................................................................................................,,....................................................................................,,,............_..................................................................................m....................................................................................................................................I..........................................................................................................................,................... Comments: a) FZe ulations and Sionifcance®The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Ckmate Protection Act( 2 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Scwarzeneer established California's Green House Gas ( H )emissions reduction target in Executive Order(Eta) S®3@05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emssions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010® GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020, and GHG emissions reduced to 00 percent below 1990 levels by 2050° Additionally, on December 7, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USE R) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(x) of the Clean Air Act; (1) that GHGs endanger human health, and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The US EPA defines 6 key GHGs(carbon dioxide ( Oz), methane ( H4)„ nitrous oxide (N20), by rofluorocarbons (HF s), perfluorocarbons (PF s), and sulfur hexafluohde (SFr)}. The combined emisslcns of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor,vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates, California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an Increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (,IF) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AE) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (PTS), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy, The ARB estimates that 36 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (bath in- tate and out-of-State)at 26 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial)activities account for 9 percent„ agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent.. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change„ Therefore, consistent with the A t3"s Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adapted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Pnv 4,,17 E1—E2 Pg52 Initial Study for SUBTT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 ..... ..... ..................... Ir,ess V%an ql[nifita r Less pcten�aPy V110 Than lssues and Supporting Information Sources: icaunt NO Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis(CEQA 15064.4) Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035, SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors alI criteria pollutants except PM,o, PMz5, and S02 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow 1--fighway station The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and S02 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based an ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings) Ozone, PM1o, and PM2 5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly elines for the Implementation of ct would normally be considered ld violate any ambient air quality ality tui quality violation, expose sensitive 9mg— used with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes,Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 lCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staffs proposed Gl--IG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for norr-lridustriM projects, as described in the SCAQUID's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Project related Id "s would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis (Giroux &Associates, March 2015, updated December 2017), total project related ernissions would be 227.1 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table, 0 Emissions (`011S9 T Co !(L Area Sources 3.4 Lnr_y Ulhzwwn 44.3 Mobile Source 161.5 Solid Waste GenermI011 6.0 Water Con--au U011 5 1 ..Annualized Conitruction 6,8 Total 227.1 ianificance Threshold 3,500 As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MT 02e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to Gi--M emissions, Rev 4-17 1— 2 Pg53 Initial Study for SUBTT11 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 .................................... ...... ....... ........................................ .................. ...... r''J Lms FVdmaily Tlh�in Issues and Supporting lnformat'ion Sources,, Gqm,Ak;�anu sign'Feanm No .............. Cumulative Short The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4 5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e Generators, workers vehicles, materia[delivery, etc.), The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction reWed GHG"s are also emitted from offsite haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site, Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossikbased fuels creates GHG's such as CO2,Cho, and N20. CHH is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis (Giroux & Associates, March 2015, updated December 2017), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would resk4t in mirtima[emissions that do not exceed the SCS `s Interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered nimal. The proposed project would have less than a significants ort- erre cumulative impact w4h implemeritation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance w4h Mitigation Measure 4,5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPE[R� I The project must comply with all rulest t assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractors alt select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural as for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term, CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for"adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available tothe City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the iinderstanding that technology Rev 4-17 El—E2 Pg54 Initial to for SUBTT1 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 11�Dss�han Signpficanl Przant W�y Issues and Suppor-fing Information Sources.- 5 gn&w,,1 P- WUgan hon 5,gind,cant Nzi 1-'. 11 changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future To date,, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project proposes the subdivision of 7.17 acres into 10 single-family lots Themajority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities) The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including' water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Clumate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks, Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the an Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375 Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis (Giroux & Associates,, March 2015, updated December 2017), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term,, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SC, es interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-com pound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: a Increased insulation. 0 Limit air leakage through the structure. 0 Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. a Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. 0 Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. a Install light colored "cool" roofs and coal pavements. a Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. Rev 4-17 E 1—E2 Pg55 Initial Study for SUBTT1 9917 City of Raricho Cucamonga Page 27 ........... .............. ................................................__'____""''................... ......... .. ...... ............... ... Len PuWNIAUy W iian Issues and Supporting Information Sourcea: Svy mhc�lw�� umry sicy Acaw No ............................................... ........................".." ? DOM __..................................... F1�4, � I 2tvssa^0111_2!�___' 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: a Install water efficient landscapes and Irrigation systems and devices, in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. a Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), 6 Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low Pow faucets:, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. 0 Design irrigation to controli runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces, 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition ste® Provide Interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) No other applicable plans, poticies,or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond tot Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CA ). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re- use and rehabihiation of existing structures® link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunk1es, The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan, The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerabW which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the it Quality and Greenhouse as Impact Analysis (Giroux & Associates, March 2015, updated December 17)® no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed "the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short- term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal, With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. Rev 4-17 El—E2 Pg56 Initial Study for SUB 19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 U995 Than S 1;11ndfcaim Less :NMeinzfly V1111 'Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: '9199AC211nit Pg,iginn Sig, ftanl :N 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d} Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 9) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildiand fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments, a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes, This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The proposed project is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, east of East Avenue, at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gypsum Drive and Raindrop Place and is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north, a tract of single- family homes under construction to the west, the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east, and the 210 Freeway to the south. The project proposes the subdivision of 7.17 acres into 10 single-family lots. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition,which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State, The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the Rev 4-17 Ell--E2 Pg57 Initial Study for SUBM9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 ................ ............................................................. ............................,,... ,,,,.,,. . . . .,,. . �..........................................................� ,.. ..............................................,,,,,,,,,,........................................,,,,,,, ................................................... Page . ........................................... ....................................u.,............................................................._.M.................................._..........................................................,,,,..,,..................................., ..,,,,........................................................... t. s To-an S 9"'cecad�t less P s uall'y wt Dian Issues and Supporting Irbforirnation Sources: Sgntu:im nr�t,g�t�au No ..........................tip,,.. . ...M a�a6 '+�u�car�ar;a4ard "mt,uarc:m Ilc,�'m a�r4 _................................ ....................................................................... ,.............................................. .,,,,,,..................................V......... .............................................................................�?,,....................... storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste wi[l reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than significant, Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels There are existing residences immediately west and adjacent to the project site; however, as the proposed project is a single family resident l development, it will not generate toxic air contaminants. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Flan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concealing the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are sensitive receptors, residences,, or schools located within 114 mile of the project site. There are existing residences immediately west and adjacent to the project site; however, as the proposed project is a single family residential'- development, it witl not generate toxic air contaminants, Therefore,, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project site is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site, Site inspections in July 2015 and February 2015 did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal!dumping of hazardous materials, Therefore, no impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan according to the General Ilan Figure PS-7 and General Flan FPFIR Exhibit 4,8-1 and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 5 miles northerly of the Ontario airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no impact is anticipated,. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable airport, is located approximately 2 and 112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits, Therefore, no impact is anticipated.. ) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes tee existing developmentNew development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every 3 years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster, Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a!Very High Fire Hazard Severity lone according to General flan Figure PS-1, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 El—E2 Iraiitial Study for SIB 19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 ............................................ Page ........................................................... ............................. ..........................................m,,,..,.......................... „m,,,............................. .....................,,.....,,,,,,,,. ,,,,............................. .........................R... .,.............. ...................... Less n'han Significant Less Fla'�IenP�;s'I 'Nd!u�,h Texan Issue and Supporting Information Sources: S�ii�gtiudc:a�nt h,,r„ga'*n s,g�f;ant chez _................�.M..........................................................................,...�.................................. ,,,,M................................ ................................... .......................................... � rna Incur�� al�d Imcact pn .25.a 9. "�DROL Y I TEFF QUALITY. Would the projeck ) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b} Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on®or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance bate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, { } ( } { } M injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or daPTl? j) Inundation y seiche, tsunami, or rroudflow? ( ) { ) ( } {�} Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District ( D),, The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems, The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General PIP ES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (S RCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board ( W B)o Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or Rev 4-17 1—E2 Pg59 !Initial Study for SUBTTI9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga — Page 1 .,,, .. _...,.. m.. . ......�... . �,a,,,, .. .. ,.�,... .., ,sues :and . u orti " uV'Y,tltl „" pp ng lnfrrrnatic�n Sous°awes: r r x,��a Issues rit„'U��& hNil ra��Vif`ri'I "�Y�;�drvtl�ir,.„'u�urr�0. IFd� , �,m .. . .. .,,,,, .. .. ....... �.... .. significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a Eschar er must submit a Notice of Intent I) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires. all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and radia • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (S P P) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction ollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving -site into receiving aters. Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm suer systems and ether waters of the ation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP, To comply with the NPIDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an a PPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan ( P) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff, The applicant has submitted a WQMP, ngineering, April 2015)e which identifies BMPs. to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soi sq,entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from rive a s, roads and other impermeable su aces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system Ps include both structural and non-structural control methods, Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention ,sins„ oil/grit separators, and porous pavementNon-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the sources generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials, Practices such as periodic parking lotsweeping can substantially reduce theamount of pollutants entering the storm drain system, `Fhe following mitl ation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent Construction ctivifres° } Prior to issuance f grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building icial for approval, a Storm WaterPollution revs ti to specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site a ce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm i system tote maximum extentpractical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan,and implemented for the proposed projectthat identifies s eciic measures t control ®site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbingactivities are initiated through completion f grading. This Erosion Controlshall include t e fol!owing meas s ata minimum: aSpecify the timing grading and construction to mi i i soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in thern California, ainspection and maintenance programsal be included to ensure at any erosion isdoes occur either osite oroff-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program it i a specified i s frame. Rev 4-17 E1–E2 Pg60 Initial Study for SUBTT191 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 S gra ifj c,lii n 11!as's RvIont"zilly W11111 Thain =Issues and Supporting Informabon Sources, 511411,5 i 2 : 11, 11:qg&�kon 91gn1C1�jJ1rq Pic 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) for to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPOES General Construction Permit. Post-Construction Operational.' 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system tote maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the it for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD,approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins, CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to sett is increased need to the year 2030. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows, The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official Rev 4-17 E 1® Pg61 Initial Study for SUBTT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 aiw Sonificalit UP'S:T, issues and Supporting Information o Sftenliat�y yfti 'han urces, S gri t�lr,ant H, rin :gnlllc,u111111 I No 1110d Wyatt and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on® or offsite. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of thea cunt of new building and hardscape proposed on a site,,,however, the project wili not alter the course of any stream or river.. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits, Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or osite. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes rn absorpbon rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of thea ount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site, however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows, The project thrill not result in substantial additional sources of po4uted runoff, A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on® oroff-site Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development1sigrifficant redevelopment,- therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigatlon measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated, 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the it of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice oftntent (NO[) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction for Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Diso harger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 10) The developer shall Implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (HP Engineering, April 2015) to reduce construction pollutants from tel the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical, Rev 4-17 E1—E2 Pg62 Initial Study for SUBTT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 Less Than &g�W=`Nt L�Pss Issues and Supporting Information Sources, Pweaa 4 11h Tlmn g) The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-59 and is outside of a FEMA Zone A (100-year floodplain);; however, the southeastern portion of the project partia��y 1[es within FEMA Zone -shaded (500-year floodplain). All new construction of res^clential units are required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which require the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated h) The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5, and is outside of a FEMA Zone A (100-year floodplain): however, the southeastern portion of the project partially lies within FEMA Zone X-shaded (500-year floodplain), All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100--year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete4ned channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure P -5® and is outside of a FEMA Zone A (100-year floodplain); however, the southeastern portion of the project partially lies within FEMA Zone X-shaded (500-year floodplain). All new construction is required to comply with the City®s Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development would not impede or redirect floodwaters and would be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City, 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? V) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy® or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Rev 4-17 E1—E2 Pg63 Initial Study for SU TT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga ........................ .. Page 3 ................ ..........................................w.........................m.m...........................,,,...................,,,.,................... . ,................,,, ....................-,.�m...m.......................................mm............................�.m....................,......................,........................mm.................,... ................... I�r�il Issues and Supporting .... Sources° �ar;n1n "d��l�uwia:.u�ti� No .. „�.,,, . .mm,.,. ..., ,....nmm..................».....p.�C- .' rc u ir•rllti�awt OVfiI�Gt ..........................gym ..... n orrt�atuor nn .�.,.........,..........., ,............:............................., �!�..........� Comments: a) The proposed project is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway, s�,°,)uth of Banyan Street, east of Fast Avenue,, at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gypsum Drive and Raindrop Place and is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north,, a tract of single-family homes under construction to the west,,. the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east„ and the 210 Freeway to the south The project proposes the subdivision of 7.17 acres into 10 singllle-family lots This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north and west. The project will become a part of the larger community, Therefore„no adverse lrnpacts are anticipated, b) The project site land use designation is Very Low(VL) Residential of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCA 's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated, C) According to the General flan Figure RC-4, and Section 4..10 of the General Plan FP R, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources. According to the Biological Resources Assessment (Scheidt, February 2015, updated by L L Environmental, Inc,, November 2017) the project site consists of heavily disturbed lands and native Prunus rticifolia Shrubland A fiance(PISA)habitat. Habitat on-site is transitional and although a portion of the sate was previously identified as alluvial fan sage scrub (Lepidospartum ,s uamaturn Shrubland Alliance (LSSA)) the vegetation onsite does not meet the criteria for Ufls habitat, No riparian, wetland, vernal pool drainage, or other jurisdictional feature was observed onsite. The 2017 San Bernarnardino kangaroo rat (SBKR)(Dipodom s merriami parvus) presence/absence survey was negative. No sensitive botanical species were observed or were determined to have a moderate or high potential of occurring after completion of the botanical survey. No burrowing ovals or burrows were observed during surveys, No federally lusted threatened or endangered species were observed or will be impacted by the proposed development, The mitigation measures and discussion as indicated in Section 4,, Biological Resources, a) 1 — 3 shall reduce the impact to less-than-significant .... m,...,, .... ., __111111,__. ......,,, -. „ ,, .........., ,- 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project., a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the tate? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally...........................................................�na..l... -.��C...�............... mineral resource recoverysite delineat, w „ general plan„ specific plan or other land use plan? ,, �.. _............... L n.„.......... Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Flan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated b) The site is not designated by the General Plan,Figure R -2 and Table RC-1„ as a valuable mineral resource recovery site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 Ell—E2 Pg64 Initial Study for SIJ BTT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 36 L5iOSD Than k3nificant Less llc,enaiwy Wm Thiv Issues and Supporting Information Sources: I" ig"Ificam PdAig,iition S grmficant Nu r12. NOISE. Would the project result in,- su a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in V) xp of excess of standards established in the local general )f plan or or noise ordinance, orapplicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive — ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise (V) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? :!If d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient V) _0 noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted®within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) ora project within the vicinity of a private airstrip—, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. Due to the proximity of the 210 Freeway an Acoustical Analysis Report (Eilar Associates, March 2015, updated December 2017) was prepared for the project site. Most of the site is anticipated to be exposed tonoise levels exceeding 65 CNEL in the future noise environment, and therefore, mitigation is required to bring noise levels into compliance. The Acoustical Analysis concluded that with the following mitigation measures, noise impacts on the project will be less than significant. Exterior- A is barrier with a top-of-wall elevation of 1,421 feet (stepped down slightly from the oft top-of-wall height of the existing sound attenuation wall in place at the adjacent Tract 18122 property, located to the west of the project site) shall be constructed along the entire length of the south property lines of Lots 8, 9, and 10, and extending approximately 40 feet north (measured from the south property line) along the east property line of Lot 10. Construction of this noise barrier shall be completed prior to the occupancy of any new house associated with the subject tentative tract map. 2) Noise barriers shall be constructed as either a solid wall, or a combination of an earthen berm and wall such that the top of all for either the 6-foot high or 8-foot high wall (measured from the finished lot gradelpad grade)is at the minimum required height (top-of-wall elevation of 1,421 feet). The sound attenuation all shall be solid and constructed of concrete masonry units (CMU) with no cracks or gaps, through or to the wall. Any seams or Rev 4-17 El–E2 Pg65 Irdtial 113tiui,(.ty for St J131"T''191917 City of Rancho Cucamonga .................................................................................................................................................................................. Page 37" .................................................... .......................... ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ......... ...a�` ..... ..... ............ ............................... Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sig,11,4cal 4 I......................................................................_'�................................................................................................................................................................I.I.............................................................................................................................. .................. ......................... ........................................ ........... cracks must be filled or caulked. Any gate(s) proposed to be constructed in a sound wall must be designed with overlapping closures. The at (s} may be of %-inch thick or greater wood, solid-sheet metal of at least 18-ga metal, or an exterior-grade solid-core steel or with prefabricated door jambs. Interior., House product is not proposed at this time as the applicant only proposes to subdivide the project site for future reside teal development, An analysis of interior noise levels generated by external sourceswil[be required with any proposal to construct a11I 10 houses within the project or with any proposal to construct each house within the project (e g , proposals for single-bt development that are submitted individually), This noise analysis will be required to determine and discuss the mitigation rneasures necessary to attenuate, control,, and mwntain interior noise levels to 45 CNEL Or less Once these mitigation measures have been determined, the project proponent for the house product will be required to implement them b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not educe ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The project proposes the subdivision of 7.17 acres Into 10 sin gle-fam0y lots. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Trans ation rafficl it will likely not increase ambient rioise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4,12) indicates that during a construction phase, onsite stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, wUl generate noise exceeding City standards The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 3) Prior tot issuance of any grading plans a construction-related is mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approvaL The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers'standards. 5) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project-site. 6) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related is sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. Rev 4-17 El-- E2 Pg66 Initial to for SUBTT17 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 38 as%Tuan Sqmficanl Less Issues and Supporting Information SourceSources: S,ftfill i,g:ii v hr:131 1 mil Ad.gV,WiThan an &gnXic&a NWb 7) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 8) The construction contractors all change the timing andfors ue ce of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 9) Construction or grading shall oft place between the hours of and 6:30 a•m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 10) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however,if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 11) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and ® a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally,if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 5.2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1--E2 Pg67 I nifiM Study for SU1991 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 39 ........................................— .......................... ....... . .. .......................................................................................................................... ............. I.. . . ...... . ................... 11.0si Tan S,grAk:Jn1 35s 0',th lhar� ISSLJLz�Sand Supporting information Sourcies: kl,�IgaMnn 5,qn��cmi� ........... ............... .......... ................. .............................. .......... ..... �n�namcumed finrlaa J "M . ........................................... 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project, a) Induce substantial population growth in an area,, either directly (for exarnple, by proposing new homes and busiinesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? ........... ................... ...................................................................................................... .......... b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessftafing the construction of replacement housing elsewhere'? ................................... .............................. ............................................................................................................. ............................ ............. ........... I(") Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere, ........................ ....._...................____....................... ..t„„........... ............................... ........ Comments, a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will include the development 10 sin&-famdy homes on 7.17 acres It is estimated that the project will generate a poplulaflon growth of approximately 30 persons, Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impact as the project is coriisistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation which density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR, Since the project is an infill protect and surrounded by developed infrastructure, adequate schools and the utility capacities to serve the project, this minimal increase in population is considered less than significant. Construction activities at the site w4l be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated b) The project site contains an existing church and vacant land and, therefore, there will be no displacement of housing or people No impacts are anticipated, C) The project site contains an existing church and vacant land and,, therefore, there wifli be no displacement of housing or people. No impacts are anticipated. .................................................... ...................................1.11--',......... ........... 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or,other performance objectives for any of the public services.- a) Fire protection? ...................................... ................................ ............. ................. .................................................................................................................... b) Police protection? ............1111111...... ................................................................................................................................. .11,........ .............................. ........... ......... C) Schools? (_1) ............................................. .................................. ....... ...........................Parks?.............................................. ......................... ............................................... V) Other public facilities? ...................... ...........11...........- ..................... ...........—.111-11111111111-........................................ V) Cdents�: a) The site, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue, would be served by Fire Station #176 at 5840 East Avenue, located approximately 1 06 miles from the project sate Tl,,ie project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any Rev 4,17 E1–E2 Pg68 Initial Study for SUB 19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 40 Less Than Sigriificanl Ill.ess 11:11weu IwMy WRI11 hIlIn and Supporting Information Sources: unifcant III Ni =Issues existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of Service,, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developing area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, The nearest park, Etiwanda Creek Park located at 5939 East Avenue, is located approximately 0.40 miles north of the project site, The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developing area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4,14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square toot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 15® RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional V) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities orrequirethe construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga The nearest park, Etiwanda Creek Park located at 5939 East Avenue, is located approximately 0.40 miles north of the project site. This project is not proposing a substantial amount of Rev 4-17 E1—E2 Pg69 lni'tial St.u..ody for SUB,,,r,,,IF 199,17 City of Rancho Cucamonga ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. Page 4 1 • .. ,,. ..... .. ....•.............. &gnffican$ Lass Issues and Supporting Information ga�� vnifc�� 4.1n w3oud�.�s. ��i8i BRita�o �i��r�r�jrW RY7 .,.... .....,.... ..-. .... � �, „.,,,,.,m,.,.,.., ,,,,�........,a.,,� .,W„,,..,.:�: .,�,�,� � ,.,,. p"ctY Nrreu i�v�B,�u�V �.v'ull'.�m R new housing or a large employment generator that would cause a significant increase In the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated b) The project does not include the development of neva or the expansion of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 16, T ANS ORT°A�O ITRAFFIC. Would the projer;.. W,•, ••.••,•• ...... .,.• �� ,.. � . t' I an applicable plan, ordinance or policy I H establiishirog measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all ,nodes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components oft e circulabon systema including but not limited to intersections„ streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and blicycliks paths, and mass � transit? .. __ ....��._�._ � g g Conflict including,blot not lircong to i level of ��_._ ,..�. ( ,��,� „ .rt•, .,.r �, ..,,,, ) Gonflnct with an applicable congestion ana ernent service standards and travel demand measuresor other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) ...an Result in se change traffic levels traffic , in . ,,, ...... .�.__... . , .• •........... m; patterns, including either ( ) ( ) ( ) (�) r a change in location that ................t risks . .............................._........,, result i .....substantial... .safe ... _.........�,.................., , .._.._ ( �.. �).... _..(...) ,. ...... ) ...d) Substantially increase feature (e sharp curves dangerous intersections) �i or incompatible p uses (e.g., farm equipment)? ......................,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .... .........",,m.,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,.w........._..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�.�, ......,,,,,,,,,,,,,��_................ ,,,,,,.,,,. ..O. ........ t(...) . f_ .)__ ... e) Result , inadequate emergency access? � ." .................... . ... .. . ,,,,,. _,Conflictwith adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding ubc transit„ bicycle, or pedestrian .�,. facilities, I or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities, Comments: a) Impiementation of the proposed project will generate 130 vehicle tris daily, The proposed project conternplates the subdivision of the property which will allow for the development of 10 lots The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estirnates that each residence will generate 13 tris daffy. As noted in theGeneral! Plan FPEIR (Section 4,16), continue development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepare and impacts ev tuate , The project its in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existin or included in project design, The project will not create substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements(curb, gutter and sidewalk)along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition,. the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the Rev 4.17 1®1 .2 I ' Initial Study for SUB 19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 42 Less Than T"7 significant Less 4 Issues pal"maBy [ Than =Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significara .MRIgall." S gmf,,ro N4 Icepack 1ACOr OrWed f2pff ed applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18,2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 5.2 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements(curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections of farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. The project proposes the development 10 single-family homes on 7,17 acres. The project design does not provide typical features to support transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.), but was designed to consider the infrastructure requirements for a single-family home, including local infrastructure (e.g., streets, sidewalks, and traffic/pedestrian signals), level topography, supporting transportation, and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated, Rev 4-17 E1—E2 Pg71 I-ri&M Sturdy for SUE3TT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 ........ .. .. .......... - r gn!fira nt Less Issued; and Supporting Information Sources: ��d� ,�� Vrilh V anm C 9 °rit�r W „uum'4 &q tagn S gr,Pxai°up 17p_ w,TRIBALsubstantial RESCI...RCES.. �Ldbsf adverse change in t —11-1-11.111 t� �i�.X�` .., ...... ..,. n -.�... ,gym.,,.,.., U Would the prraler~ i he significance of a tribial cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is g ^i .,naphicallyP defined in terms of the size and scope of the Ian dsca pe, sacred place, or object with the cultural value to a California !Native Ameriran tribe, and that is. a) Listed or eligible for fisting in the California Register of ( } i; V) Historical Resources, or in a local register of historic,'al resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020,1(1 ), or u res- . _ .Y„ determined agency, in its (V) discretion and supported by substantial evi. _. �the lead O O ( ) dencieR to be sil nificant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision(c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public �` t Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shell consider the significance oft the resource to a California ..__ Native American trufae°. Comments: a) As defined in Public. Resources Code 21074 and applying the criteria located in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c), the project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource®"per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24(Historic Preservation)- A Cultural Resources Survey Report(Laguna Mountain Environmental,Inc, October 2015, updated lurch 2018)was performed on the project site. In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted The culturab resources records search indicated that there were no historic resources within the Sturdy Area and none were identified during the pedestrian survey. The update to the Cultural Resources Survey Deport identified that at least 19 cultural investigations have been documented within a 1/2-mile radius of the project area, Eight resources have been recorded as a result of these investigations and consist of 7 historic-age resources and 1 prehistoric isolated stone flake, The historic resources are 2 residences, 1 structure and associate refuse, historic walls and landscaping, and 3 refuse scatters. These cultural resources will not be impacted by the proposed project. ) In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064,5® a Cultural Resources Survey Report (Laguna Mountain Environmental, Inc, October 2015;, updated March 2015) was prepared for the project site and did not identify any cultural resources within the project area. The update to the ultura[ Resources Survey Report identified that at least 1 cultural investigations have been documented within a 112-dile radius of the project area. Eight resources have been recorded as a result of these investigations and consist of 7 historic-age resources and 1 prehistoric isolated stone flake, The historic resources are 2 residences, 1 structure and associate refuse, historic walls and landscaping, and 3 refuse scatters. Based on the updated records search, 4 new studies have occurred in the project vicinity since the initial records search One of these is the Cultural Resources Survey Report for this subdivision, the other 3 studies did not provide additional information rebated to the Rev 4.17 E1®E2 Pg7 Init4l Study for SUBTT11 City of Rancho Cucamonga ................. ................ Page 44 ..........................................................-1............................................................................. .................. Les, Siium'ia,.mt Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P:::entia i S gma nifcarlIIr sigmficant Nz .............................. ........................................................................... ........................ project, and did not result in the identification of new resources. No additional cultural resources have been recorded in the vicinity of the project since the initial survey and ,records search in 2015. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. No potentially significant cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the project area, In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during project related construction activities, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until a qualified archaeologist can visit the site of discovery and assess the significance of the archaeological resource. As well, Health and Safety Code 7050.5, CEQA 15064,6(e), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in the unlikely event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. ,As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the San Manual Band of Mission Indians on September 101, 2015, On September 21, 2015, the San Manuel and of Mission Indians ('S I)requested additional information about the project site to determine if the area is sensitive for tribal cultural resources and if consultation is necessary, but also requested that at least one Native American Monitor be present during ground disturbing activities (iiricluding, but not limited to pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, boring, grading, excavation and trenching) within the project area. On October 6, 2015, the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians deferred to the S who are in closer proximity to the project site. ,On December 10, 2015, staff forwarded the Cultural Resources Report to the SMBMI; no comments were received regarding that report. Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant 1) The applicant shall contact the SMBMI to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level,to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13,and Section 21083.2(a)through(k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant all submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading its for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 1 00-foot buffer of the find)shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Rev 417 Ell—E2 Pg73 Initial Study for iU `f f-i9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 45 .,..,a„. .........11-1-1.111---... ....,,,,,.. .,,,, 7 7; ` . ,,,. Ibgireodii,:nsnt N,.mwss Issues iiind ,Suppor6ng lnlorrnahon Sources, S nd, ca nN 941 gator Sgpl&camaa NO �fl grra0. lwa+q Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities,,the land owner shall arrange a designated site location i in the footprint of the projectthe respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects, Any discoveries of human skeletal material shatl be immediately re o e to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discoveryis to be kept confidential ec re to prevent any further disturbance. If NativeAmerican,the coroner Will notify as mandated by state law who will then appoints Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered humanremains cannot be fullydocumented and recovered on the same a , the remains ill be coveredit sli cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opeto protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24 hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tri e( ) will make everyto recommend ive i project and keeping the remains in situr tecta . If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that urs I ill be removed, The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavationis treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation s ail be taken is includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approvede Tribe(s) for data recovery r ses, Cremations will either be removed in bulkr by meanss necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes r burials, the location isconsidered et separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicantll consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avol Il cemetery sites. Once complete, o final report of all activities areo be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) o NOT authorize any scientific s liz i any invasive diagnostics on human remains. ) In the event that NativeAmerican cultural resources isc vduring project activities, all work in the immediate vicinit f the find (within 0- foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hiredthe find. Workn the other portions the project outside of the bufferedr iduring this assessment eri e archaeologist shallcontact tI for input regarding the preservation, rte ti n final disposition of any discovered cultural r s r s. The archaeologistI r mitigation I an and technical resources management report, whichshall document the inventory, evaluation, t mitigation resources i iii the project area. Additionally, the SMBMI will be contacted if any such fin occurs n provided information and per it linvi e r site visit the archaeologist makes his/herassessment, so as to provide Tribal input. II archaeologicaC resources e r je t construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualifiedrc I ist and NativeMonitor. If the resources rNative American in origin, the Tribe(s ) shall coordinate with the landowner r r i re and c r ti n of these resources., Typically, the Tri e( ) i'll request reburial r preservation for educational Rev 4-17 Ell—E2 Rg74 Initial Study for SU13TT19917 C4 of Rancho Cucamonga Page 46 Less Than sigm&canl pwerii anj %Oth Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: &?Rficam purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with teapplicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in pIce (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum,if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society inthe area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources,as defined bY CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI-qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of is shall be provided to the SMBIVII for review and comment. All in-field investigations, assessments, /or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a SMBMI Tribal ii (s). Tela Agency and/or applicant shali, in good faith, consult with the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non-Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal Placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property OwnerlDeveloper, as deemed appropriate. Once ground-altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Rev 4-17 E1—E2 Pg75 Initial Study for SUBTT19917 C4 of Rancho Cucamonga ............................ Page 47 .................... ................................................................................................... ............................................... ""''......................... ........................................... .............-........... PLAO jJ,, "T;111 [Ssues anid SUPPOrtnig information Sources: 'VM�vv�� ! IS, No. Inc ........... ......... ............. -1, ......................................................-......................... ....... .................... .................................................... ........... 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: ,a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the, applicable Regional Water QualAy Control Board? ................................ ................................ .................. ............................................................................................. ............. ................... b) Require or r-esujt in the construction of niew water iDr wastewater,treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause silgrifficant environmental effects? ....................11111�11--.....-.......... ........................ ....................................... -........................ .................. .......... Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause signifir.-,ant environmental effects? d . ............. .... .....................-1-.....................................- ................. .............I.................. ............... Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? .............. .. ....................................- e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment V) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in �addition to the provider's exisfin, commitments? 9 .................................. .......... ............................................................-.,...................... .................................................... ...................... f) Be served by a landfill with suffk;ient permitted cap"a c )....... to accommodate the project"s sotild waste disposal needs? .............. ................. g Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? .............. Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Wand Empire Utilities Agency at they RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants, The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additionai development within the western and southern areas of the City, The RP-4 treatment plant has a potentiaI uitimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all, increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated- b) The proposed projects served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity, The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) Alt runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain fadlifies, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Officiia[ and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated, Rev 4-17 E1-E2 Pg76 Initial Study for SUBTT1 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 48 Less Than — significant Less 130',e*a�ly %V.01 Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S gnr"m Ntaigmicn SgnificanP NO _LM—Mad Ln—Corporaled —IT2act Ipatt d) The project is served by the CVWD water system, There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated, e) The proposed project is served by the CVVVD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated, f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated, g) This project complies with Federal, State,and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. r19- MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE e p a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the 0 quality ity of tt ua lity of the environment, substantially reduce the a itat of a habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually 7 limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that WI _0 7 _0 V) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project site is located on the north side of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan Street, east of East Avenue, at the southeast corner of the intersection of Gypsum Drive and Raindrop Place and is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north, a tract of single-family homes under construction to the west, the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin to the east, and the 210 Freeway to the south. The project proposes the subdivision of 7.17 acres into 10 single-family lots. The site has been disrupted on approximately 3.2 acres of the project site by unpermitted grading and site clearing. According to the General Plan Figure IRC-4, and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is within an area of sensitive biological resources—the Coastal California Gnatcatcher(CAGN), the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), Coastal Sage Chaparral Scrub (LSCS), and Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS), Rev 4-17 E 1— Pg77 lriit(al Study for SUBTT19917 City of Rancho Cucamonga .............._................... ......................................................................................... Page 49 .................. ...................... ............ .......................................-"" ...... ...... .... ............. P�J�PM issues and Supporting Information Sources� 57111'k�ant No ........... ................ According to the Biological Resources Assessment (Scheidt, February 2015, updated by LL Environmental, Inc,, November 2017) the survey area consists of heavily disturbed , lands and native Prunus Xcifolia Shrubl'a nd Alliance (PISA) habitat Habitat on-site is transibonal and although a portion of the site was previously identified as alluvial fan sage scrub(Lepidospartum squamatum Shrubland Alliance (LSSA)) the vegetation onsite does not meet the criteria for this habitat, No riparian, wetland, vernal pool drainage, or other jurisdictional feature was observed onsite The 2017 SBKR presencelabsence survey was negative. No sensitive botanical species were observed or were determined to have a moderate or high potential of occurring after completion of the botanical survey. No burrowing owes or burrows were observed during surveys. No federally listed threatened or endangered species were observed or will be [impacted by the proposed development b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR,, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of b0d-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence, The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less•than-significant levels. As such,the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts(CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)), These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space, With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed, Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s)pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis, The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Orlve(check all that apply),, General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) General Plan FIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) Rev 4-17 EI-E2 Pg78 I notual Study frau° SUBTT19917 CitY of Rancho Cucamonga ................ Page 50 M Masker Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Para Update (SCH #88020115, cartwtaad January 4, !989) TECHNICAL APPENDICES (v") I coustica�AnaUysus Report (EflarAssociates, March 4 2015, updated May 311, 2018) (V) Air QuMity and GHG Impact A nMysus (Giroux Associates March 24, 2015, updated December 12, 2017) M IB or og'cal Resources Assessment (Vincent Sch6dt, February 2015) (L&L Environ mental,, Inc., November 2017) Cu,ufturaV Resources Survey Report (Laguna Mountain Envilror mentM, October 2015, updated March 2, 2018) GeotechnicaI Investigation Report (City& County Soil Engineering and Testing Corp., January 2015, updated December 11 2017) Q Ju dsductuona0 Delineation Opinion (Kissinger Environmental Consulting„ June 6, 2015) �y Water Quality Management Plan (I..IR Engineering, March 1141, 2015) Rev 4-17 E1—E2 Pg79 Initial Study for SUBT71 9917 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 51 APP CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this InitW Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the,proposed mitigation m as res Further. I have revised the protect plans or proposals and/or her the proposg7mifigatio measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects tea point ere clearly n s!11 gnificant environment I effects would occur. Applica nt!s Signa Date: Print Name and Titles,' Rev 4-17 E1—E2 Pg80 - 1INGATION MONITORING CHSCKLIST (MITIAL(MITSTUDY PAR TI 111) Project File No.: SUBTT19917 Applicant. Bob Castillo Initial Study Prepared by: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Date; June 18, 2018 Mitigation Measures No.J Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Date Sanctions for I t tin cti for Monitoring �en Verification Verification I I niti ls INon-CompliancC, Section Air Quality , Shorl Term (Construction) Ernissions 1} All clearing, grading, eaith-mowng, or PDIBO C Revie f platys A/C 2f4 excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAOMD guidelines in order to limit fu iti e dust emissions, 2) The contractor shall ensure that al d: tu rbed PD C Review of plans AIC 2t4 unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3i tines daily during dry weather Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas; shall j occur at least three t:mes a day, preferably in the midmorning. afternoon, and after work is done for the d The contractor shall ensure that traffic speedy l l i cf pin 2/4 — n unpaved roads and Protect site areas are reduced to 1 miles c-hourr I 4) till construction e uip ent shall I t airitained PD G Review of plans Ac 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction I site for Ci!y vehfication. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PDt13 eview of plans C 2 the developer aha i ubm t Construction Plans to the Cita denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use- Construction contractors shall provide evidence that . :Mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was estigat d and found to be unfeasible for the prosect. Contractors shall also conform to ars Page 1 of 2 Mitigation Measures No._/ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Date Sanctions for Limp ction for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification /initials 1 Non-Co construction measures imposed by the South Goast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as Cit� Planning staff 61, T he construction contractor shall utilize electric PD C Review of plans 'kic or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible The construction contractor shall ensure that PD C Review of plans A/C construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Elf All asphalt shall meet or exceed p—erformance B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108, 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed BO C I Review of plans A/C performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low M 10) All construction equipment shall comply with PD 1 Review of plans I A/C -14 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, —^ contractors shall include the following Reestablish ground cover on th BO 00 e C Review of plans A/C 214 construction site through seeding and wat a Pave or apply gravel to any on-site hau.' BO C Review of plans 214 0 Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility i BO C Rev-ew of plans A/C 214 of large areas to erosion over extended enods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the BO Review of plans A/C 2/4 mc amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. a Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO Review of plans A _____7' accordance with local ordinances and use sound en tices, a Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During A 4 established by the City -if silt is carried over construction to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Tjmi ing may vary Page 2 of 22 | Sa Vd D Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Method Timing of I - of erifieate notions for Fran 11nitials Implementinn cin for Monitoring uency Verification Verification Non-Comoliani:5_r construction, Suspend grading operations during high iBO C Du, A 4 winds (Le,® wind speeds exceeding const- 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 reLluirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard IBO During A ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads --on Con-W--on tarps or other suitable means. _ 1 The site shall be treated with water or other BO D ng A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD const-u--hon and Regional Water Quality Control Board -'RWQCB)) daily to reduce Particulate Matter PMio emissions, in accordance with Sim AQMD Rule 403. 112) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO iG Du_-na A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all const-UCUM f inactive construction areas that remain inactive M for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions, Long Term Emissions % 13) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and iBO C eview plans 1 2!4 reduce thermal load with automated time QU clocks or occupant sensors. ewAlc 141 Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant BO C Rev i otpa s '4 species to reduce water consumption and to nrovide Passive solar benefits. 1 15) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials i60 C review of dans and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP M s Sources MSC-01 measure. res sha'_ be —q--red to DD -Ins -13 16-_1 All -esiaen.la' strut . or p ncomo—te njahffidencv 11OW-0011 n Y healing,air conditioning..app-h-ances- and water I Seaters. pD 17) All resideW'al structures silan be realuir d C Re -w of lans -0 __M - i -ane wndows and incomm-orate Uq-T 2= wealhe astri Ang, - MW D develoornent F-Y o' Ranc- o D Sri the G h - Rev_� of E)'ans 0'3 h UH-camonga shall' comply w-tSouth Coast A u-lity Management D;Istr'--'s Rule 445 Wood Burnm Devices. yule 444 was adopted in Page 3 %ti ation ea urea o. esponsible MonitoringTiming of et of Verifiedata actions for Implementing Actio for c�r�it qrr! �requer�c �►erificatlott E Verification /Initials or�s�o I�ar� arch 200 to reduce a fissions of p z e and - precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices �i.e, fire lacesth and in new ev lobTent on or after March 2009- Section 4®Biological Resources 1 Within 30 days prior to the initiation of I PIS -view of pI ns X14 groundbreaking activity, performs a focused trapping survey for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat S !C ) following the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) protocol- The focused trapping survey shall a conducted by a permitted biologist, e and the USFWS shall be consulted for incidental take permitting if SBKR are found can- site- ' three days prior to the removal of vegetation PD B Review 3 of plans B or ground-disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring ccu ie nests snail not be disturbed unless a cc qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive I methods that either(a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation, or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival, if the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the - young, If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist, The temporary "no construction"area shall be maintained until the l nest has completed its cycle, as determined b Y y a qualified wildlife biolo ist. Once the nest Page 4 of 22 Mitigation onitoring Timing of Method of Imnlementfar Verified Date Sanctions for ing Fre aveeged enc-- Verification cycle Verification /initials Non-CqTRHanR,__, and have le the nest® construction in the area _ I may reser 3) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in PD B Review or plans B conformance with the Department of Fish and 2/4 Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and outlining the findings to the California the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys and M Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. I Results of the pre-construction survey shall M rj be provided to CDFW and the City, If the pre-construction survey does not identify U:1 co burrowing owls on the project site, then no V1 further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting Occupied burrows during th-- nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most cu r nt —DRV Dro- cols and will at establis-I mu-nt of u minimum inc- b ff setbacks from occupie d burrows andowl monj cring. ground-diisturb'nna activities are de-aved or suspended for mofe than 30 days after the pre-constriction sup vg-; the site shall be resurveyed for owls, During the nonbfeeding secason fp--3m Septem er 1 throUlgh i_a-n u a ry 3 1, -if rn burrows are OCCUDied b ft :Fatrato- no- Pdage -5 of 22 Mitigation Measures No.I ja I�Ie Ile n n Responsible I Monitoring 1 Timing of ti et�&d Of—V—eri–fiedb-at�e ' '�—anctjons for r Monitoring 1 FreQ,uencv Verification Verification ria�v !Initials Non C bane- p Fe- eclusian and oexclude wls frc these b+�rra5r�s. erre f' exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified W ii li fe biologist, The temporary -no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife IT t biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest® construction in the area may -a resume. U3 00 Page 6 of 22 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible 1 Monitoring Iming of Method of Verified Date I Sanctions for for Monitoring Freq uencY 1 Verificafic n Verification /initials Non-Complianc-, PD Review of plans B 2/4 grab ing activities a they i pact vegetation _ - onsite. qualified biol ist aha!!inspect ebris ilea, i es, urrc��rs= ve station, leaf litter l piles_ and other potential refugia for sensitive wildlife species prior to initiation of clearing, grubbing, grading, or any other Project activity I that may injure or kill sensitive wildlife species If wildlife is discovered, the qualified biologist shall move it out of harm's way or allow it to move safely out of the or area prior to initiation of Project activities. Potential day roosts for pallid bat (e,g., caves, crevices, mines, hollow trees, buildings- etc., shall be inspected by a qualified bat biologist prior to initial ground disturbance. and submitted to CDFW for review prior to If bats are roosting,a bat exclusion plan shall be prepared M impacts. If a colony is discovered during the M 110 breeding season (March® ctober}, the -0 biologist shall determine appropriate to 00 avoidance measures, including, but not limited to sound walls, buffers, and Project phasing/timing to prevent disturbance to the colony until all your are weaned and capable of foraging independently. Section d- ltr l Resources _Jc _I_z:, a ,fn prehl�stanc ar haeological resources are t f, encountered tbefore or during g-r-m-3-ing, the c -cl- Estlueveloz)er will retain a quial.-fie-d ar haeolog, to monitor const—c-tron a.cOV-1es. to taEe appr prime measures 101 -- F p- ed or pres-erve n_ I ern for smi av, With the aaSsist- ance of the Q monga archaeologist, the CiEv of Rancho 13/80- C Enact intEeIrim measures to Drol-ct P -0 RUN-w OT apo t N4 unde ignated sites- ft-m demo-Hition- or I sign_ cant mod JfJ cae=on without an or-i 'tv � the City to establish its ;-o --n r:ort Pap 70-22 Mitigation Measures P Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of eriie ate ncions for I Imi ierrientin Actio c aeo6forMonitoringFrequency 1 Verification Verification /initials on® It nc _aro ical value_ - . ___ - �®Haider establishing provisions to require ' P � view f repo _ , - {. irxcorporatior� of archaeoiogioal sites within He developments, msiH their special malities as a there or fecal point, Pursue educating the public about the PD/BOIReview of report arcaeoio ical heritage of the area, Prepare ti tion plan consistent with v1e of - -- Section 21083.2 Archeological resources 9 Plans/Report f CEQA to eliminate adverse project � During effects on significant, important, and Responsi Mitigation Measures No.I ble Monitoring Timing of Method t I Dlementi I Verified Da e Sanctions for _IER! ln� Action for Monitorin 1 Fre uenc - Verification Verification tio n (initia'Is fossils with minimal construction delay, to Non-Com Hail the site full-time during the interval of earth- disturbing activities, T�_� Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review iew of—report 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth- i disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage= if construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered PD D Review of report D fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e-, San Bernardino County M U§t-U—M) Submit summary report to City of Rancho A FD D Review of report D M Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San "a Bernardino County Museurn, Section 6-Geology and Soils U3 C 00 1 The site shall be treated with water or other BO 110 During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCA construction and Rv) daily to reduce Ma emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re- planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible roma to F n BO C During A 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept A 4 c i� �1�gn� 1 according to a schedule established by the City !1 construction to reduce PMI�, emissions associated wjth- vehicle tracking of soil off-site- Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO i C During A �n the time of, year of rDun_Pg __j _4 construction wind speeds exceed e6 mph to minimize Mo construction emissions from the site duri nRiEh_eisods, 14) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During A 4 SCAOMID and RWQCB) shall be applied W all construction m inactive construction areas that reain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMIo emissions, Page9 of 22 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method jdDa_Ce7§i`ncti`ons fo— lmf!lementinia Action for Monitoring Fr Of Verifl r on� ire Verification Verification i /initials _Com�wl, i Section 7—Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cumulative Shoji Term (Construction) GHG2 I Emissions 1 i The project must comply with all rules that BO During A assist in reducing short-term air pollutant 4 construction emission in compliance with Si3Mr, Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as i 12) The construction contractor shall select 1 0 9 C A construction equipment based on low-emission During 4 factors and high energy efficonstructionciency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and 1 maintained in accordance with the manufacture M 33 Trucks shall trot idle continuously for tt�ore than urin M 5 minutes, 4 4) Altiii-native n utilized in lieuwrinA 4 construction engines when feast e, 5) Construction should be timed so as not to 13 0 Dunng A interfere��h peals-hour traffic- 4 construction 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be 80 During A supported and encouraged for construction i crewconstructon - Cumulative Long Term (Operationat, GHG Emissions I A During 7)�Co�nstruciionancl�Iljildflngmaiterials �bel BO �A ��m produced and/or manufactured locally Use 1 Construction "Green Building Materials'� such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-vola tile-organic-compound iif materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California BO A' During Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of- Construction Page 10 of 22 e Measures M s Iementin A n Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Date Sanctions for m Action la for Monitorin F-re uenc Verification Verification /Initials Non-Corn fianc, n . 101 Increased insulation, Limitair leakage through the structure, incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. * Landsca.pe and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds, and I landscaping,n * Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Install light colored "cool" roofs and coo' pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes(LED's) for outdoor 1I htin 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation �_O _T_ During C 2 strategy appropriate for the project and include Construction the following: lnstall water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho C ucamonaa Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the p-O-ect f available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD)- Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances -including low flow faucets. dual flush toilets, and waterless uadnals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to to non=v;egetated surfaces, remove water' 2L�� I 10Reuse andeerecycle con s truction and demolition n E Revi—ew 0 plans waste, Provide interior and exterior storage areas for rcYclab_eS and green waste in public areas, Educated employees about reducing waste and a. 0trec cin C Page 11 of 22 iti _ tin s r oo tResponsible Monitoring Timing o! le entin Action Verified_to Sanctions _foro ifori 'Verification Verification /Initials Section 9Hydrology d Water Quality lin _ �s s Construction Activities Rrior t issuance of gr ding per itso the erra�itB 0lIi Review of plans applicant shall su it t wilding fficiai for214 apprcval, Storrn hater Pollution Prevention Plan PPj specilmcally idea#ifyin fest � ` anagernent practices s) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system io the ataxirncrrn extent practical. �� An ressaon otttrol pian shall be r� uredo p pB B/CIDReview of pians Al _ inclu ed in the radia €'[ n, artd i pleat nted 2t`t for the proposed project #hat identifies specific ensures to control on-site and off-efts erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following jmeasures at a minimum a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in LO Southern California, and b) An inspection and UD t`rmaintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration o ram,within a specified time frame- 3) ra e3) During construction, temporary b rats such a t i I Review of plans ,-' i sandbags or ravel dikes must e used to 214 prevent discharge of debris or sediment from e the site when there is rainfall or other runoff 4 wring construction to remove pottutan@s i f Review of plaits = A/C street cleaning will e perforated prior to storm = 2t4 events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of: debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance f grading or paving permits, , B B/C/D Review-of plaits C � - 2/4 the the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent OI)to comply with obtaining coverage under i the National Pollutant DischargeEliatination iS ste P 1General Construction Storm _Page 12 of 22 Mitigation Measures No,I il-Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified bate Sanctions for Imulernentint- cti on for Monitoring Verification Verification /initials Water Permit from the State Water Resources I Non-Com-DlianU Contro Board, Evidence that this has been obtained i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger' Identification Number)shal-be submitted to the City Building Official for -coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. A Uon Operational-3.421-Construd Prior to issuance of buildTr W ing p- the BO BACK Re-view of plans IC 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of aWater Qua-ity Management Plan(WQMP), including a psale-61 description and Identifying Best Management Practices _,BMPs) that will be used on-site 10 reduce pollutants Into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable, The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structur-3- measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment ad -opted by the City of Rancho CtIcamonga in -June 2004, 7) F Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO P, n W plans -14 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions fora minimum of two years, shall be submitted tote City for review and approval D_i0_ to the issua grading.�ermies. Uf 111g Activf'11'_.�_s C1 8), io- 10 issuance of buildrir,ng perm ds�_ theJ'C'[)so B H � I . Review of plans C 2/4 appicant na- . submit to the City- Engineer for I s- , approval of a Water Quality Management Plan QMP irscludinq a project description and identifying Best M-1--anaaemen' Practices (BMPS) hat will be used onsite to reduce Pollutants Into the storm drain system to the maximum extent i--b-e. The WQM3 shall TV the 1 -3 ac,ca. I - - - identd ll L - _5 U s'ructural and non-s.r UC&luial meq res Page 13 of 2_9 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring 1 Timing of --iMetho& f i 1 Verified Date Sanctions for for Monitoring 1 Frequenc I i Verification Verification ' I /initials Non-CRM lianc velon3erat and eevelop ant adopted by _p Prior to issuance of grading or patting perrnts BO i BlCiD Review of plans 1 A/C --4-- the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent 1 2/4 INOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPS ES- General Construction Storm I Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained(i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharge.-'s Identification Number)shall be submitted to the I City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 10) The' developer shall implement the Efm—ps- SO -- 1 B/C/D Review of plans 1 A/C 2/4 t identified in the Water Quality Managemen 1 Plan prepared by HP Engineering, April 20 51 1 to reduce construction pollutants from enterin 9 the storm drain system to the maximum extent actical Section 12–Noise LIP Exterior 411- A noise barrier with a top-of-wall elevation of PDYBOC Review of plans 1 A 2/4 1,421 feet (stepped down slightly from the 1.421-6400t top-of-wall height of the existing sound attenuation wall in place at the adjacent Tract 18122 property. located to the west of the project site, shall be constructed along the entire length of the south property lines of Lots ® 9, and 1 O: and extending approximately 40 feet north (measured from the south property line) along the east property line of Lot 10. Construction of this noise barrier shall be completed prior to the occupancy of any new house associated with the subject tentative tract map Noise barriers shall be constructed as either a PD/BO C-7 Review—of plans I—A 2/4 solid Il® or a combination of an earthen berm 1 and wall such that the to of wall for either the 6-foot high or foot highwql�measqred from, - Page 14 of 22 Mitigation Measures o®! Responsible Monitoring Timing of 1 Method of Verified Date iSanctions for Imale mentin Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification I /Initials Non-ComAan7_ the finished lot gradelpad grade) is at the minimum required height (top-of-wall elevation of 1-421 feet), The sound attenuation wall shall i be solid and constructed of concrete masonry units (CMU)with no cracks or gaps, through or I below the wall. Any seams or cracks must be filled or caulked Any gate(s) proposed to be constructed in a sound wall must be designed with overlapping closures- The gate(s) may be of %-inch thick or greater wood, solid-sheet metal of at least 18-gauge metal,or an exterior- grade solid-core steel door with prefabricated door;ambs, Interior House product is not proposed at this time as the PDIBO i C 1R-e-view oil ola�s A applicant only proposes to subdivide the project site - 2/4 for future residential development. An analysis of interior noise levels generated by external sources M will be required with any proposal to construct all 10 rn houses within theproject or with any proposal to construct each house within the project (e.g., cn proposals for single-lot development that UD at are Ch submitted individually). This noise analysis will be required to determine and discuss the mitigation measures necessary to attenuate, control and maintain interior noise levels to 45 CNEL or less. f Once these mitigation measures have been 1 I determined, the project proponent for the house 1 product wil- be required to impleme-t-,them. B pias 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a PD/ Review of n 2/4 B- construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and I approval The Plan shall depict the location of 1 the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) During all project site excavation and grading, BO -wo the project contractors shall equip all Re,J DMUns i AX 214 construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with Droperly operating and maintained mufflers 15 Of'22 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible 1 Monitoring i Timing of Method of Verified Date i Sanctions for Jm le tin for Monitoring i requencV 1 Verification Verification 1 /initials i Nor!__C0_MR11__ �� `he project contractor shalt lace alt statio€�a �� B Review of Plans I A/C 2/4 construction equip ant so that ern�tted ntr�se�s _the ro est site. 6) Theconstruction contractor shall locate1 BO 8 Review of plans N_ —72f4'— equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction B 7) The construction contractor shall obtain the CE Review of plans D 214 City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible- 8) The construct—ion contractor shall—change the 1_PD/BCF_ Review of pians ' 214 timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times M of the d! NJM 9 Construction or grading shall not take place 0 4B/d/b7�1R—eview ofplansA/C 2/4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m, and 6:30 a.m- on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 1 10) Construction or grading noise levels-shall not BO B/C/D Review of—plans exceed the standards specified in 214 Development Code Section 17.66.050, as 1 measured at the property line. Developer s hail hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring asspecified In Development Code Section 17,66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official, If noise levels exceed the 1 above standards, then construction activities shaII be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or I halted. 11t Haul truck deliveries_—shall not take, lace BO I B/C/D 1 Review of laps 1 A/C a. 2/4 Page 16 of 22 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring 1 Timing of Method of Verif-ied Date Verifi �Verification /initials Non-Com between the hours of&00 p m, and 6,30 a.m, days, Saturday or at any on weeK time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwelliggL. Section 17—Tribal Cultural Resources 1) The applicant shall contact the SIVIBMI to PD repoi discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that be mm - encountered during ground disturbances are 1� protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal U2 Representatives and will be present on-site uo� during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis The logs vvill provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any I I ied. In addition, the cultural materials identf monitor(s)will be required to provide ' insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s)encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083 2(a)through(k) The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and I excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources / '- -- Mitigation ares No.f 1 Responsible 1 Monitoring Timing f et �i fe ntin f Verified to Sanctions forActior for onitorin Fre uenc ertficatic� submit the results of these cosrsultations to the - _ � � Verification /initials N��COaP_ City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site: In the event that human remains or funerary D eview of report T r. objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project® work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of z the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7056.5, and that code small be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains andlor ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human rn skeletal material shall be immediately reported I to the County Coroner The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner Work will continue to be diverted while the 00 coroner determines whether the remains are l Native American The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner ill notify the NAHC as mandated by state iaw who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. in the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel folate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24 hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will l 1 make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected If the project cannot be diverted, it a e determined that burials will be Page 18 of 22 _�_ Mitigation Measures tva.l Responsible MonitoringTiming f etho of l/erified ate Sanctions for Im le or Action I for oitorin Fre e c srificati n Verification !Initials n- o n re oved_ The Trie(sj will work closely it _ s the ualifed Arcaeolo fist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethic Il . and res ectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribes , documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed l descriptive notes and sketches. Additional l types of documentation shall be approved by f the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes Cremations will either be removed in bulkor by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. � I Once complete; a final report of all activities are E to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains, �' In the event that at American cultur I PD B Review of report Cly resources are discovered duringproject activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find(within a -foot buffer)shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period, The archaeologist shall contact the S 13 I for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a , mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area ,additionally, the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find crs and provi ed inforrr�atfon Page 19 of 22 Mitigation Measures No. to _ Responsible 1 Monitoring Timing of � tit d t ImPlementingl Action far�or�itaringraq� rifiatior� a i iate Sanctions aii tion /initials n par itt diravit to erfor site visit - !s I Non-Comaliantl when the rcaeoloist s ler assess ant, so as to prod Tribal in ut. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and !Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin,the Tribes shall coordinate ; with the landowner regarding treatment and our tion of these resources. Typically. the Tribe(s)will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes.. If a resource is determined by the QualifiedArchaeologist to constitute a "historical resource' pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has ®unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083 2(g) .I the Qualified ,archaeologist shall coordinate' oor in to with the applicant and the City to develop a ! I' formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources The ,, treatment pian established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064,5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21063=2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in plat (ive.® avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis- ,any historic archaeological aerial that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public. nonprofit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material, If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated Fuge 20 of 22 - ` Mitigation s-a- a asResponsib--- - easures No. le Monitoring T _inn of 1 Meeh - - = _ - � F r big '' _' I ale roti Action for Monitoring Frequency - eri is tion V kation inal- to local school or historical society in the area for educational pumoses, o 4) In the evert that significant Native American PD B Review of report C;D historical resources® as defined by GEQA {as 1 amended, 20151, are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured,an SOI-qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a F cultural resources Treatment Plan_ as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the SMBMI for review and comment i All in-field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitoredy a SMBMI Tribal articipant(sj, The Led Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith® consult with the SMBIVII on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the croect. o iron dative American artifacts shallbe PD e�ie of report inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership)_ function, and temporal placement, Subsequent to analysis and reporting. these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer as deemed appropriate_ Onceground-altering activities have ceased i or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary: 1 monitoring activities may be discontinue following notification to the City of Rancho 1 Cucamoncia Planning Department Page 1 of 22 pKe to-Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency I Method of Verification Sanctions it Director or designee A-With Each New Dew-om'Opment A-On-site inspection PD-Planning Director or designee L3�p 1 -Withhold Recmdahon of Proal Ma- 2=Withhold Grading or Building Pem, Or To Construction B-Other Agency Permit 1 Approve CE-City Engineer or designee G-Throughout Construction I C-Plan Check SO-Building Official or designee D-On Comoletion 3�Withhold Certificate of Occupanc--- -00-Police Captain or designee Separate Submittal'ReponsfStui:iies/Plans) 4-Slop VNIo*Order E-Operating m NJ -0 Page 22 of 22 RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 RESOLUTIONTHE PLANNING COMMISSIONCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT1 1 , A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE7.17 ACRES INTO 10 LOTSI VERY L ( L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC , LOCATED F THE 210 FREEWAY AND EAST OF EAST AVENUE AT THE EASTERLY EXTENSION F WILSHIRE DRIVEVMAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF e 2264102-3 . A. Recitals. 1. Bob Castillo filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 9, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga an conducted a duly notice public hearing n the plication and continued the application to a date non-specific. 3. On August 8, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that ate, 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption o this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, n resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced u lic hearing on August 8, 2016, inclu in ri ten and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically fins as follows: a. The application applies to a 7®17 acre site, located directly north of the 21 Freeway at the future easterly extensions of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive, is is located generally in the area east of East Avenue and south of BanyanStreet; and b. The property to the north of the subject site contains existing single-family homes (Tract 18708, ®lotsubdivision), the property to the south is the Foothill Freeway (SR-21 0) and beyond that are existing single-family homes, to the east is the East Etiwanda Creekn the San Sevaine FloodControl Basin, and the property tote west is a single-family tract currently under construction (Tract 18122, a 76-lotsubdivision); an C. The project site is rectangular in shape with an east® est dimension o approximately 330 feet and a north-south dimension of approximately 940 feet; and ll—E2 Pg 103 PLANNING COMMISSIONRESOLUTION O,. 15®46 U 19917® CASTILLO Au ust 6, 201 Page d. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VQ Residential District, Etiwanda SpecificPlan; and e. The proposed project involves the subdivision of a 7.17 acre parcel into 10 lots for future residential development; and f. Development/construction of the homes following the subdivision of the property ill be by others® as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so the selves„ and gn The site is located within the Very Lo L) Residentilal District of the Etiwancla Specific Plan (PSP), which permits a maxir num density of 2 dwelling units per acre® with an average lot size of 25,000 and a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. Lots within the proposed subdivision range in size from 23,276 square feet to 25,557 square feet with an average lot size of 25,078 square feet; and h. The project complies with all applicable development standards as described in Figure 5-2 of the ESP and the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code; and is One neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the site. The meeting was held at Summit Intermediate School located at 5959 East Avenue on November '17, 2015, No members of the public attended the scheduled neighborhood meeting and no public comments were submitted in advance of the meeting; and j.. The Design and Technical Review Committees reviewed the project on August 4, 2015 and bath recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission; and k. The project does not include the construction of houses.. The architecture of the houses for this subdivision will be subject to review and action by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission at a later date following the submittal of a Design Review application; and I. The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project on September 96 2015 and recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission; and m. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation ,quests to the several Tribal Governments that requested to be notified following a completeness determination for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917. The notices were mailed on September 108 2015 and provided for a 3 -day comment period ending on October 12, 2015. o response to the Tribal Consultation Request was received; and na This application as advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Malley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: El—E2 Pg 104 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 S U BTT1 9917— CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page 3 a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The application proposes to subdivide the 7.17 acre project site into 10 parcels for future single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low (VL) Residential; and bThe design orimprovements ofthe tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The project site is vacant and the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where the project is located and the expectations oft community, The zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and G. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The 7.17 acre project site is adjacent to existing residential land uses to the north and east and will obtain access through the continuation of the existing street network through the extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat, The proposed project is for the subdivision of the 7.17 acre site into 10 lots for future residential development. No homes are proposed in conjunction with this tentative tract map. Mitigation measures described in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) will beimplemented during the construction and operation of the project', and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems, The proposed subdivision was designed to meet all applicable development standards outlined in the Development Code and Efiwanda Specific Plan, and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. There are no public easements across the project site. 4. as upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQW) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, it staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental effects of the project. as on the findings contained inthat IS, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, it Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City received comments from the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works (SBCDPW) and the California Department of is and Wildlife (CDFW). of El—E2 Pg 105 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,, '18-48 U TT19 17-- CA TILL August 3, 2013 Page 4 agencies raised questions that required further environmental study, and Vie revision and recirculation of the ISIMND. The IS/MND was revised significantly as requested and now also includes revised discussion and additional mitigations related to noise impacts, The IS/MND was recirculated. No additional comments have been received in response to this recirculated environmental document; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, basad on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CE t ; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. used on these findings„ the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated NegativeDeclaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section; 21061,6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the lnil:W Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all ether materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the PlanningCommission's decision is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5, Eased upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Environmental Mitiqation Air Quality® Short Ter construction) missions 1) All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. ) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roes and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three( )times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved reads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 1--E2 106 PLANNING O I I RESOLUTION N , 18-48 SUBTT199'7m CASTILE August 8, 201 Fuge 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced ars maintained as permanufacturers' specifications, Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCA ) as well as City Planning Staff. C) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 3) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. ) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions. • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering ractices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a E1—E2 P17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 U TT19 17— CASTILLO August 8, 2013 Fuge result of hauling. Tinning may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations daring high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements, • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or ether soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board ( )) dally to reduce R ,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rale 403° 1 ) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce R ,o emissions. Lon Tenn Rio°ect erational Inn acts 1 ) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 1 ) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 1 ) Provide lighter color rooting and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure- 16) ea ure- 1 ) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to Incorporate hig h-efficiencyflow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 17) All, residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 13) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality ManagementDistrict's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of R 2 5 and precludes the installation of indoor aroutdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009° Biological Resources 1) ithin 30 days prier to the initiation of groundbreaking activity, perforin a focused trapping survey for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat ( Ft ) following the United States Flush and Wildlife Service (U FW ) protocol. The SBKR focused trapping survey shall be Eli—E2 Pg108 PLANNING COMMISSIONRESOLUTION . 1 -48 SUBTT1 1 ® CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page conducted y a permitted iologist, and the USFWS shall be consulted for incidental to er itti if SBKR are fours on-site. 2Three days prior tote removal of vegetationor ground-disturbing activities, a breedingit survey that is in conformance with the Migratory itAct shall be required to determine et enesting is occurring, Occupied ets shall not be disturbedunless a qualified biologist verifies through ei vaie methods that either e adult birds have not begun egg-layingor incubation; o ( the juveniles from the occupied este are foraging independently a are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then o disturbance shall occur within feet of non—raptor nests, and within5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid andon e t oft e you If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary"no construction" area shall e maintained until the nest has completed its cycle® as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction int e area may resume. 3) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Reporton BurrowingI Mitigation and submit-the written report outlining the findings tot e Californiae arf nt of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreakingactivity, The survey shall include aitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing 1 Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing I Survey methodology shall be based o Appendix (Breeding and Non-Breedingson Surveys and Reports) o the CDFW Staffepo esuts o # e pre- construction survey shall be providedto CDFW and the City. If the pre-construction survey does not identify burrowing owls o the project site, then no further mitigation is required. I burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey, measures shall be developed the qualified biologistin coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied rro s during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current protocols and will at minimum include sta lis n of buffer setbacks from occupied urro s and owl monitoring. If ground-disturbin activities are delayed or suspended r more than 30 days after the pre-construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non-breeding season from September 1 through January 1 a if burrows e occupied by migratoryor non- EI—E2 Pg109 PLA1,4NING COMMISSiUN RESOLLJTI0rJ NO, 18448 SUBM 9917— CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page 8 migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre-construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination; with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines, During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 4) A qualified biologist shall monitor clearing and grubbing activities as they impact vegetation onsite. A qualified biologist shall inspect debris piles, pipes, burrows, vegetation, leaf litter piles, and other potential, refugia for sensitive wildlife species prior to initiation of clearing, grub Nng, grading, or any other Project activity that may injure or, kill sensitive wildlife species. If wildlife is discovered, the qualified biologist shall move it out of harm's way or allow it to move safely out of the work area prior to initiation of Project activities, Potential day roosts for pallid bat(e.g., caves, crevices, mines, hollow trees, buildings, etc.) shall be inspected by a qualified bat biologist prior to initial ground disturbance, If bats are roosting, a bat exclusion plan shall be prepared and submitted to CDFW for review prior to impacts. If a colony is discovered during the breeding season (March- October), the biologist shall determine appropriate avoidance measures, including, but not limited to sound walls, buffers, and Project phasing/timing to prevent disturbance to the colony until all young are weaned and capable of foraging independently. Cultural Resources 1 If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga wil[m Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. El—E2 Pg1 10 PLANNING COMMISSIONTI . 18-48 SUBTT1 917®CASTILLO August 8, 201 Page • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using theirspecial qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological herita e of the area, • Prepare a mitigationla consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, a ni prehistoric resources, including of limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a ark or green space or paying an in-kind mitigationfee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, proposed iti atio of resources within e project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information e ter for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e, plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer ill retain a qualified aleo told ist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further ii aio measures (i,e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate, ere mitigation o itorin is appropriate, t e program must include, t of be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction dela , tot e site full-time uin the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere rail the monitor has completed salvage. If construction perso ne a e the discovery, the grading contractor sui immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the fi • Prepare, identify, and grate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate e osit (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens it copy of the report to San Bernardino County useu E1—E2 P111 PLANNING COMM ISSIOWFESOLUTION NO. 18-48 SUBTT19917— CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page ,10 Geology and Soils 1 The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, In accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shali be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site, Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction, 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMo emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemicat soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions urr7ulatir� rt Terra ( onstructon hl ons 1 The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- lerm air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQ Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice dally or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffia, 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cum ulativei2fflier °rational I l rnissiorts 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or E1— Pg1 12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 SUBTT1 9917— CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page 11 manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic- compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance, • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. EI—E2 Pg1 13 FILANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 16-43 11 TT19917® OTILLO ,August 8, 2016 Page 1 Hydrology-and Water Quality Construction Activities tl) Prior to issuance of grading permits„ the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( P P) specifically identifying Best Management Practices ( Ps) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain systern to the maximum extent practical, ) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared„ included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control onsite and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimuma) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) ,An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. ) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from, the site when there is rainfali or other runoff. ) During construction,„ to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. ) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (IVO]) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( P ) General Construction Stora Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post-Constructi n Ooerationa ) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official fora prowl of a Water Quat'ity Management Plan ( P), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices ( Ps) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and El-- 2 Pg114 PLANNING COMMlis SlON wSOLUTlOrl 1,,,1 0. 18-46 SUBTT1 9917- CASTILLO August8, 2018 Page 13 Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticidestherbicides, Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions fora minimum oftwo years, shall be submitted tot City for review and approval prior tote issuance of grading permits, 8) Prior to issuance of building permits, thea plic n ll submit tothe City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system tote maximum extent practicable.The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Diso harger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit, 1 ) ? developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (HP Engineering, April 201 5) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise Exterior I A noise barrier with a top-of-wall elevation of 1,421 feet (stepped down slightly from the 1,421,6 foot top-of-wall height of the existing sound attenuation all in place at the adjacent Tract 18122 property, located to the west of the project site) shall be constructed along the entire length of the south property lines of Lots 8, 9, and 10, and extending approximately 40 feet north (measured from the south property line) along the east property line of of 10. Construction of this noise barrier shall be completed prior tot occupancy of any new house associated with the subject tentative tract map. E1-E2 P' 115 PLANNING COMWSSiON RESOLUT01\1 NO. 18-48 SUBTT19917—CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page 14 2) Noise barriers shall be constructed as either a solid wall, or a combination of an earthen berm and wall such that the top of wall for either the six-foot high or eight-foot high wall (measured from the finished lot grade/pad grade) is at the minimum required height (top- of-wall elevation of 1,421 feet), The sound attenuation wall shall be solid and constructed of concrete masonry units (CMU) with no cracks or gaps, through or below the wall. Any seams or cracks must be filled or caulked Any gate(s) proposed to be constructed in a sound wall must be designed with overlapping closures. The gate(s) may be of 3%-inch thick or greater wood, solid-sheet metal of at least 18-gauge meta[, or an exterior-grade solid-core steel door with prefabricated door jambs. Interior House product is not proposed at this time as the applicant only proposes to subdivide the project site for future residential development. An analysis of interior noise levels generated by external sotirces will be required with any proposal to construct all 10 houses within the project or with any proposal to construct each house within the project (e.g., proposals for single-lot development that are submitted individually). This noise analysis will be required to determine and discuss the mitigation measures necessary to attenuate, control, and maintain interior noise levels to 45 CNEL or less. Once these mitigation measures have been determined, the project proponent for the house product will be required to implement theni 3) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 4) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained of consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 5) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 6) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and inoise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 7) The construction contractor shall obtain the Cfit ®s approval for its haul Ian® with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. E1— 116 PLANNING I RESOLUTION . 18-48 SUBTT1 1 — CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page The construction contractor shall change the timing /o sequence of the noisiest construction oper tions to avoid sensitive times of the day. } Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours o and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Satu , or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, 1 ) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. itori at other times may be required y the Building (ficial. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official, If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall e reduced in intensity o a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 1) Haul truck eliveries shall not take place between the hours of and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Satray, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling ou exceed 100 daily trips (counting of to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation la denoting any construction a is haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures.To the extent feasible, the plans all denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings, Tribal Cultural Resources 1 The applicant shall contact the SMBMI to discuss Tribal Monitoring of e project during all ground disturbingactivities, and any trenching below the initial rad fuel, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during grounddisturbances are protected and preserved for study. The nit r(smust be approved by the Tribal Representatives n ill be present on-site dri r n disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring los on a daily basis. The los will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural t rials identified. Inaddition, the monitor(s)will be required to provide insurance certificates, i c1 ing liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered durigrading and excavation ctiviti s pertinent tote provisions outlined in the California Envir ent I Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13s and Section 21083.2 ( through ), The on-site monitoring shall e the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for El—E2 Pg 117 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTfON NO. -18,48 SU BTT 19917— CASTI L LO ,august 8, 201;8 Page 16 archeological resources, The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity(within a 100-foot buffer of the find)shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code§7050.5, and that codes alI be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful l reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects- Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. or will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether 'IV'ie remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confideritial and secure to prevent any further disturbance, If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. It this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tri (s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted® it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shalt be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of ail activities are to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards® shall be hired to assess the E1--E2 Pg1 18 PLANNING I RESOLUTION , 18-48 SUBTT19917— CASTILLO August8, 2018 Page find. Workn the other fo s of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the SMBM1 for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources, The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report® which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area.Additionally, the ill be contacted if any such find occurs and e provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the "Fri (s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and c ration of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial o preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource"pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), te Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts tote resources. The treatment pla established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in lace is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is of Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution it a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino o ty Museum, if such an institution agres to accept e material, if no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational u uses. ) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined y CEQA(as amended, 1 ), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SO]-qualifiedarchaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as Discovery a onito in an, the drafts of which shall be provided tote SMBIVII for review and comment- All i o ent_Ili ®fie investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by SMBMI Tribal a ici nt(s). E1—E2Pg119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOUU110N NO,, 18-48 Stili T r 199'17— CAS 1 111-1-0 August 8, 2018 Page '18 The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consii.jIt with the SMBM1 on the disposition and treatment of any arkfacts or q.Aher cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Noni-Native Arnericain artifacts shall' be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cufturaI affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownershp), funeflon, and temporal placement. Subsequent to aro aiysls and reporting, these airtrfacts, shall be subjected to curabon or ret,'L.,irned to the Property OwnerliDeveloper, as deerned apjpropriate� Oince ground4tering a00es have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that morkodrig activities are m:) loinger necessary, monitoring activities irnay be discontirewued following notification to the City of R,-,.Mcho CLICairnon ga Plarming Department. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall. certify to the adoption of this Resolufion, APPROVED AND,All THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 201& PLANNING COMMISSiON OFTHE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIMONGSA B"',(: Rk:;I i Chaifrnan ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August 2018, by the following vote-to-wit- AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONER& ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: El—E2 Pg120 Wy;uyim'Id'min'yI Cond a .iril Community v l nt Department Project M SUBTT19917 X42 14® 23, DRC2018-00566 Project ed Tract 19917 Locatiom 6 022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Standard Conditions of Approval 1. For all residential development, provide conduit from ac nit/of and a pull box to connect tot e street. Provide interior structured wiringfor each house/building with minimumto 5 copper ire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, rad a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and BuildingOfficial review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits, 2. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition byte developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied y the buyer, Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the PlanningDepartment to determine that they are in satisfactory Condition. 3. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Coeand/or Pian a Specific Plan, This requirement sall be in addition to the required strut trees and slope planting. 4. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review approval prior to the issuance of BuildingPermits for the developmentor prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very HighFire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed withinthe public right-of-way on the perimeter oft is project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included i the required a sca a plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval a d coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required the Engineering a ices Department. 7. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of e1 or greater slope, but less than 21 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control® Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed y the developer prior to occupancy. ti .CityofRc' N Il::umair�Gwaa� '7d'3g41gbtq� E �—E2 Pg 121 Project#- SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, 1])RC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CECA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: PLar�r�ir� �� Standard Conditions of Approval 8. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall he landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows. one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq, ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 21 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq, ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy, 9. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in pub4c maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department,, 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17,82. 12. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adeqoate Iighting. The final Location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 13. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aislies other than in designated visitor parking areas. 14. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk, 15. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 16, Approval, of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans andlor Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 17. Construct block walls between homes (i,e,, along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency, 18. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners'associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. Pninted M'01/2018 www.Cftyo9RC.us P`age�2 o�!18 E1—E2 Pgl 22 Project#: SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DR 016®00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: ®022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review® Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: EPlanni Standard Conditions of Approval 19. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 20. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 21. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail, Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 22. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, 23, On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot walllfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits, The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property, 24, All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners® association® or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits, 25. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006® and 1007B. 26, Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. N11nWd 70IM2018 www OlyrJRC us Page�3 gulf UB El—E2 Pg123 Project#, SUBTT1 9917 CE A2014-00023, DRC2018.00566 Project Name; Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 Project Type, Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. pknninint Standard Conditions of Approval 27, Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct mink-num 6-foot lrflgh decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 28. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian lRural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot Corral with appropriate fencing. 29. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Depariment to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy, 30. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permAs (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 31. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall, Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing wallsifences along the project perimeter. 32. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry, 33, Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 34, Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 35. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects, 36 Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 37. For single-family residential development, a 2--inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two 1/2-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing, Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade, 11"irinted 7130120,1 %vvm.QtyofRC.i.3s e n f t P, E1—E2 Pg124 Project# SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: EPLla�nni Standard Conditions of Approval 38. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices:, in conjunction with street improvements. 39. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. 40. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 41. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits, The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report, 42. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit, 43. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents® officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney®s fees which the City, its agents® officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this Condition. 44. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included an the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 45. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $29330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. Permed 7/30,21018 Fuge us Page 5 of 18 E1—E2 Pg125 Rroi(:pct SUB I 119917CEQA2014-00023, DR 2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location- -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: P!ann�n_ erg Standard Conditions of Approval 46, This tentative tract map or tentative parcel, map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval, n neeriln rice ark ant Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1- Copley Drive, Wilshire Drive and Street "A" are to be improved in accordance with City "Local Street"standards including'. a. Local streets per the Etiwanda Specific Plan shall have a 60-foot right-of-way with sidewalks on both sides. b. Provide curb, gutter, drive approaches, street pavement, 3" curb cores on each lot and curbstrde dri,i,in outlets per Std, Dwg 107-5 fora private trail drainage. c. Lot 4 driveway off Street"A" shall be installed as far south as possible. d. Provide 5800 Lurnen HPSV or LED equivalent street lights, e. Provide street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, of a species and spaced per Standard Conditions of Approval. f, Install curb adjacent sidewalk on east side of Street "A", Said sidewalk to start from the drive approach southed wing of Lot 10 on Copley Drive to the drive approach southerly wing of Lot 3 on Wilshire Drive, The parkway on Street "A" between the sidewalk and wall should be filled with cobble per Standard Drawing 542, Case 1. Work around existing sewer manholes as needed_ Providetraffic signing and striping as required. 2.. Vehicular access to private local trails shall be from Local Streets only. a. Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs or other diversionary devices shall be used. Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalk/street. Provide curbside drain outlets for adjacent drainage devices, 3, The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical except for the 66kV electrical!) shall be undergrounded on the project side of Foothill Freeway (SR-210), along FCD access road to San Sevaine basin outlet, extending to the first poles off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first, PrAed 7130/2018 www CRyoRC,us Page 6 W,18 E1—E2 Pg126 Project#. TT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location- - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engjn2t[j!1g_a;2e!r2y�ices Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4, The catch basins in Copley Drive need to be at the sump location. The 2 catch basins with 2 laterals shall be designed to handle 0100. a. Revise Drawing 2356® to show how this 100-foot extension will connect to the existing storm drain. 5. Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Public improvement plans all be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. 6. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for or within its right-of-way. 7. Corner property line cutoffs at Wilshire Drive and Street"A" and Copley Drive and Street"A" shall be dedicated per City Standards. 8. Tract 17651 has partially installed the Community Trail, south of Lot 7 of Tract 17651. This developer shall reconstruct the community trail full width. The existing trail is 15 feet wide and this developer shall dedicate an additional 5 feet to complete a standard 20-foot interior community trail. a. Revise City Drawing 2219 Sheet 14A, prepared for Tract 17651 to show the reconstruction of the community trail. b. if lots 2 and 3 will be taking direct access to the community trail, provide single gates per Standard Drawing 1008. c. Provide "step through"' for local trail access to the community trail per Standard Drawing 1007-B. 9. Tract 18122 is currently under groue ding existing overhead utilities on their project side of Foothill Freeway (SR-210), along FCD access road to San Sevaine basin outlet including the power pole east of your westerly boundary. The developer of Tract 18122 is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the underrs unding from your westerly project boundary to the location oft first power pole easterly. The fair share amount has not been determined at this time since a Reimbursement Agreement has not been processed yet. Standard Conditions of Approval 10, A signed consent and waiver for to join and/or for the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11, A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. pr1:1111beld 71.10121018 %V%Vm0ly0fP,(,.,US page',i, E1—E2 Pg127 Project #: SUBTT1 9917 CEQA2014-00023, DR 2010-00566 Project Name-. Traci, 19917 Locabon: -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CECA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOURPROJECT.- tEninietetrr�i!nuag-!Sierv�icesD Standard Conditions of Approval 12o Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shaR be paid for the Construction and Demo[jition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, Must compl�ete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit willi be forfeited,, Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reirribursernent: a completed CD-2form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and alt weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City l!loll;; Englneedngo Environmental Programs. 13- Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Copley Ddve 60 total feet on Wilshire Drive 60 total feet on Street"A" 14. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map, 15. Pursuant to Muni6pal Code Section 16.37.010, rio person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordibances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in develDpments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, 16. Constri..jct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Copley Drive Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees PuqiWd 7i31012018 %WAV CltyOfRl�,.U.9 page 8 01 1 iB Ell—IE2 Pg 128 Project M SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Standard Conditions of Approval 17, Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Wilshire Drive Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees 18. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street "A" Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Cobblestones Flrhiledl 7131012101118 www.cRYOR.C.Us page 19 of is E1—E2 P 12 Project SUBTT19917 CE 2014-00023, f) . 201 -00 a66 ,, Project Name:eo Tract. 19917 ., ....rmr,A� �-n� .................. .. ,,, „�,rr-,-,rr,,��mr, --------- i-ocatiow -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONSL aJE , Enalineeriina Services t Standard conditions of Approval 19. Improvement Plans andConstruction: a. Street improvement plans, lncluading street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be siubrrnutted to arnd approved by the City Engineer, Security s'ivah bea posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Atlorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street narme signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construaction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and intercontrmct wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on berth sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, El , or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Motes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 6 along streets, a maximurn of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. y Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or.as specified, e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City :standards or as directed by the City Engineer., f, Existing City roads requiring construction shall rermain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction., Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks, Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards,, except for single-family residential lots. h, Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 20. Street trees, a minimum of 16-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. wtim. ityof C.iu ICwurdi2Vlli�uV 71301/2101HIPlage fl&,V of Erb 1 13 Prpject#: SUBT1 199 17 (.`EQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name.- Tract 19917 Location- -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. �En�Jne�erin Services gtRgrtment Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows, The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear an the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet — (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Copley Drive Botanical Name- Chitalpa tashkentensis Common Name-Chitalpa Min. Grow Space-3' Spacing - 50' 0.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees'. 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only, Pnlirilecl 74310)20M mwi GilyafRC.us Page I I ar I a E1–E2 Pg131 Proj�,,�c�#: SUIE3TT19917 CEQA2014-00023,, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Locatiow Project Type- Tentative Tract Map Iii IRe0ew, Variance ...................................... ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E Services D Standard Coindkions of Approval 22 install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows, The completed legend (box (below) and construction nates shail appear an the title page of the slreet improvement plans. Street firnprovement plans shail i�nclude a line dern within the construction legend stating "Street trees shalt be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ pical (ty I ly Sheet 1)," her public landscape plans are required, tree installafion in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement play-is.. Wilshire Drive Botanical Narine- Chftalpa tashkentensis Common Narne- Chitalpa Ift, Grow Space n..3' Spacing- 50' 0L. Size- 15 Gallon Construcfion Notes for Street Trees, 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans, 2) Prior to the commencement of any ptanting, an agronornic soils report stiiall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toAclfies or nutrient deficiencies rnay require backfill, soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspecfion and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only,, Pirinlh,lid 71301210118 UtyorRC..us plage 12 of 18 El—E2 Pg 132 Project#: SUBTT1 9917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: ®022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet — (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans, Street Botanical Name®Prunus blireiana Common Name-Flowering Plum Min. Grow Space- 3' Spacing-40' 0.C. Size® 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 24. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 25. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 26. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 27. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 28. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved, Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval P6nled 7130/21018 'OAVVJ CRYO CCAS 11::Iagi,�13 of I B 1:1–E2 Pg 133 Project#: SUBTT199'17 CEQA20'14-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 Project Type- Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1, Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a, For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the fire hydrant design & installation shall be in accordance to RCFPD Policies and Standards- b. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided, c, Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. 2 The architectural plans for the construction of the buildings must be in accordance with the current editions of the CBC Chapter 7A, The California Residential Code, the RCFPD Ordinance, 3, 1'his project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VFIFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Pfobability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District The Hazardous Fire Area is basrgd on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry as adopted by the RCFPD. uiili�y ars of Services artrnt Standard Condifions of Approval 1, Submit two sets of structural calculations, two, sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following-, a. Sile/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c, Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) Including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i,e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans, 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4, Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Printed 71012018 mm(,Ay1,,.4RCA15 Pal 0 14 rf 9S El—E2 Pgl 34 S l..)[-`3 1"I'l 91917 GE()A2014 10,C)ID23:, DiRiC210118-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 Project Type- Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B u Standard Conditions of Approval 5. NOTE: The construction of this tract must be in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and /or the California Building; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. 6. The structures in this tract must be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan and The California Residential Code. 7. Provide compliance with the California Residential/Code Building Code (CBC/CRC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. 8. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 9. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 10. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits, 11. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays, 12. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residental project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportaflon Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance, 13, Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTT, SU! TP MDR, CUP, DRC® etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. Graid gjj� Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. Pr4iled 713T20118 www C�lycfRC m Rage 15 011:1 a E1—E2 Pg135 �� 111,�Iiroject SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DR 2018-00566 Project Name: 'Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. gGraradgiag_ ec � r� Standard Conditions of Approval 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill, The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer, 6, The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage PlanlPermit. 8, A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit, All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record, 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit, 10, All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property, 11. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 12. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 1100-fiaet beyond project boundary. 11 The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 14. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 15. Grading lnspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project ownerfrepresentative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shalt call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; it) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer of a designated person and approved prior tot issuance of a building permit. Printed 7)10120�8 %"wiCAyo1RC.us Flap W of 18 E1-1E2 Pg136 Project#.- SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DR 015-00566 Project Name. Tract 19917 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project Type-, Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. An rA9ift&ift2!iM Standard Conditions of Approval 16, Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP)devices. 17. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the public sewer water plans shall be 90% complete as reviewed by the Cucamonga Valley Water District, In addition, the public sewer mains shall be extended to the westerly boundary of the subdivision, 19. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office, 20. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 21. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e, a manufactured slope is not present). 22. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations, 23. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 24. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 25, In the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fence, 4" thick DG surface, parallel drainage V ditch, bridge over V ditch where necessary for access corals, gates to corrals, S< 5% cross fall 2%, S>5% cross fall 4%. Water bars required at the spacing for the slopes shown respectively: 50' for 4% to 6%, 40® for 6% to 9%, 30' for 9% to 12%, 20' for 12%+. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail, 26. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 27. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Of prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. Pfin!ed 7,0012010; %"vw,,CdyofRC,us Flagie 1�7 cl I a El—E2 Pg137 Plmject# SUBT�`199117CIIIIll""IQA2,014-1G'll�1011(,)2311, Project Name: "If'ract 19917 ............................. 1_ocalion: -022610230-0000 Project TypeTentative Tract Map EEA Review, Variance ..................... I...................................... ALL OF THE FOLL OWING CONDITIONS APR Y TO, YOUR PROJFC"r. M gGradli giflS � lrn Standard Conditions of Approvall 28. On the rough grading plain and the precise grading and dirainage plan the engineer of record shall show in each of the typical secUons and the plain view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3CRC 8401.311 CBC2304.11,211CIRC 8.3,17,1(2) and CIS C2512.1.2/CRCR703.6.2..1 of the Current adopted California Su flding Code/Residential Code. Prlweid "MVIMB vvvvvP'CRY01RCm!!i1 Page I a of I B E1—E2 Pg138 RESOLUTIONm RESOLUTIONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DRC2018-00566, A REQUEST TO INCREASE UP TO 23 T FOR SOUND ATTENUATION ALONG THE SOUTH BOUNDARY AND A PORTION PROPOSED TENTATIVE TRACT 117 (A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 7.17 ACRES INTO 10 LOTS IN THE VERY L LRESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDASPECIFIC LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND EAST OF EAST AVENUE ATT Y° EXTENSIONI I I , AND MAKING F1 N 1 NGS I N S U PPORT TH E R EOF—APN: 0226-102-30, A. Recitals. 1, Bob Castillo filed an applicationfor the issuance of Varianceo, DRC2018-00566 as describedin the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred o as "the application." 2, On August 8, 2018, the PlanningCommission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing that ate. 3. All legal r visits prior tote adoption oft is Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved y the Planning Commission the City of Ranchoc as follows: o This Commission hereby specifically i s that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, oft is Resolution are true n correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evi ce presented to this Commission during the above- referencedpublic hearing on August2018, including writte n oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission herebyspecifically ins as follows: a® The applicationlies to a 7.17 acre site, located directly north of the 21 Freeway at the future asterl extensions of Wilshirerig and Copleyrig is is located generally in the area east of East Avenue andsouth of BanyanStreet; and b. The property to the northoft e subject site contains existing single-family homes (Tract 1 -lot subdivision), ro y to the south is the 210Freeway and beyondt are existingsingle-family homes, to the east is the East Etiwanda Creekn a vain Floodon of Basin, and the propertyto the west is a single-family tract currently u er construction ( rot 18122, a 76-lot subdivision); an C. The project site is rectangular in shape witheast-west dimension of approximately 3 feet annorth-south dimension of approximately t; and E1—E2 Pg139 PLANNING ISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16®49 VAR DRC2018-00566 —CASTILLO August 6, 2016 Page . The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low ( Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Flan, and e. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow the construction of noise attenuating walls along the south, east, and west perimeters of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height; and . fuer Section 17,0 , (K) of the Development Code, the maximum height of walls permitted in residential districts is 6 feet, and g. The proposed walls will be approximately 12 to 13.7 feet above the pad elevations of the lets adjoining the walls as seen from the interior of the subdivision. The general area where the walls will be highest is near the southeast corner of the subdivision at Lot 10 where the wall„ as seen from the freeway, will be approximately 23 feet high. 3- Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during theabove- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and Bove, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code® The proposed walls are for noise attenuation purposes to reduce the exterior noise levels at the lots along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision. The height of the walls is necessary to mitigate the noise impacts to a level that is less than 65 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level ( L) as specified in the Development Code. If the walls were limited to 6 feet as specified in the Code, orif the walls were absent altogether, the exterior noise levels would not comply with the Code, nor be consistent with Public Health and Safety policies relating to noise (Goal PS-13 of the General Plan)_ There is no practical alternative to walls that will achieve the desired noise attenuation, and b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circurt'i,stances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the sante district. The project site is located approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (S ®210). As a result, it is exposed to noise generated by traffic that is generally not present near other residential properties in the City that are screened by existing development and/or sufficiently distant from, these principal noise sources that noise impacts are negligible,- and C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive theapplicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district... The purpose of the walls is to attenuate traffic noise, The exterior noise levels generated by traffic exceed the maximum limits established by the Development Code and would negatively affect a future homeowner's ability to enjoy and use the outdoor areas of their property in the absence of these walls. Furthermore, the effectiveness of noise attenuating materialt used in the construction of the homes its augmented by the presence of the noise attenuating ehmeter wall. The absence of the wall would reduce the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures and expose the occupants of the homes to elevated interior noise® and i— 2 Pg 140 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 18-49 VAR DRC2018-00566—CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page 3 d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified int same district. Throughout the City,the Foothill Freeway (SR-21 0)corridor is adjacent to numerous residential properties. Traffic noise impacts along the corridor must be mitigated to levels as described int Development Code and consistent with the General Plan. The freeway corridor abuts various residential zoning districts including the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Walls of this height or similar are common along ter corridor for is attenuation purposes where residential properties are adjacent to the freeway; and e, That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties orimprovements in the vicinity. The height of the wall as seen from the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) will be similar to the height of other noise attenuation walls along the freeway corridor within the City. This wall will be constructed per the decorative design established by Caltrans, consistent with the design of the existing sound attenuation wall to the east and will not be detrimental tot public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties orimprovements in the vicinity, 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that than is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental effects of the pro)ect. Based on the findings contained in that IS, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, it Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment, Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared. Thereafter, the it staff provided public notice of the public comment period and oft intent to Otte Mitigated Negative Declaration, The City received comments from the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works (SBCDPW) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). Both agencies raised questions that required further environmental study, and the revision and recirculation of the IS/MND. The IS/MND was revised significantly as requested and now also includes revised discussion and additional mitigations related to noise impacts. The IS/MND was recirculated. No additional comments have been received in response to this recirculated environmental document. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (I)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA- and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is nosubstantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis aft Planning Commission, Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and El—E2 Pg141 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.. °18-49 VAR C 02016-00566 —CAS fli-LC August , 201 Page 4 C. The Planning Commission has, also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081 ,6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adapts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based its the Planning [Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (9 09) 4772750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in araral')s 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Plana ing_Department 1) The approval of Variance DC2018- 0566 is contingent �,jpon Planning Conirnission approval of Tentative Tract Map SU TT19917, 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution o. 16-43 for Tentative Tract Map SU 19917 shall apply. .. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2016,. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 , Mich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the F'ia ping Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 0th day of August 2016, by the following vote-to-wit= 1- 2 Pg142 PLANNING COMMISSION I 18-49 VAR 1 6CASTILLO August 8, 2018 Page 5 AYE& COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1--E2 Pg143 yy Conditions Approval 'i ot4 u a Community Development Department Project SUBT `19917 CE A2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project game: Tract '119917 Location; - 022610230.0000 Project Type; Tentative Tract flap CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING COITI APPLY TO YOURPROJECT: Pja_ rt_rl% ____ art t Standard conditions of Approval 1. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. ProOde interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wirer Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable® and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, TTB) Plans shall( be submitted for Planning Director and Building (Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 2, For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units an inspection shall be conducted by the planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 3. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plane This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 4, A detailed landscape and irrigation plana including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior tote issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot su divlsiionm For development occurring inti the Very high Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be ,installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer, 6. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, iandscapin , and sidewalks shatl be included in the required landscape planus and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department, 7, All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 51 or greater slope„ but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation s stern to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy, Printed T'30,,21018 www,CityolRC us E1—E2 Pg 144 Project#. SUBTTVE)917 CEQA2014 10101023, DRC,2(.)18-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY To YOUR PROjECT.- Plqnajn�� Standard Conditions of Approval 8. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical I height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft, of slope area, and appropriate ground cover, In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2-1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft, of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 10, All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment, If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department, 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water of landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17,, 2. 12. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determinfa the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting, The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 13. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. 14. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk, 15. Access gates tote rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 16. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 17. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 18. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. Fldinled 713112018 %VWV1 01yap"Ir.",us IPage 2 of 15 E1—E2 Pg145 Pr0JC-.'!C1 SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DR 2018-00566 Project Name, Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 Project Type- Tentative 'Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- 2!ann;n ant Standard Conditions of Approvai 19, The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney, They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer, The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a Hist of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes, 20. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements,, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 21. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5.1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 22. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file iin the Planning Departirnent, throe conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, 230 On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot walltfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits, The parkway landscaping inclu&ig trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner, The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway mainlenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 24, All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits, 25. Local Feeder 'Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles,, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall, be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 26. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. Prnted 70101)2,018 mAvw,CityafRC,us Page 3 W 18 El—E2 Pg 146 Project#. SUBTT1 9917 CEQA2014-00023, DR 2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQ A Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. PIUDIUR2Et Standard Conditions of Approval 27. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 28. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/ ural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing, 29. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 30. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 31. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter, If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter, 3 ® For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 33. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits, 34. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 35. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. 36. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 37. For single-family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two 1/2-inch leg bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing, Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. Prin�ed 7t,51012D1119 VNAV.Cfty0fRCAUS Page,4 cl 18 E1—E2 P 14 i roja,,A SUBTT1 99 i7 CEQA2014-00023, DR 2018-00566 Project Name-, Tract 19917 Location-, -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY To YOUR PROJECT. aLar�nfn eta en Standard Conditions of Approval X A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans, Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 39. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. 40. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards, Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Departmeril prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes, 41- A final acoustical report shMl be submitted for PlanOig Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits,, The final report shall discuss the level of interlor noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the riiitigafion measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report, 42. Mitigation measures are required for the project, The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting, Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building PermRs, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures, These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 43. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shalW not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 44, Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect, 45, The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. A111 checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. PrAted 7130/2DII WWW,Cqy0RC.US Page 5 of IS E1—E2 Rgl 48 Project 4. TT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location-, -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR Stan and Conditions of Approval 46. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. En Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Copley Drive, Wilshire Drive and Street "A" are to be improved in accordance with City "Local Street" standards including: a. Local streets per the Efiwanda Specific Plan shall have a 60-foot right-of-way with sidewalks on both sides. b. Provide curb, gutter, drive approaches, street pavement, 3" curb cores on each lot and curbside drain outlets per Std. Dwg. 107-B for private trail drainage. ca Lot 4 driveway off Street "A" shall be installed as far south as possible, d. Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV or LED equivalent street lights. a. Provide street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, of a species and spaced per Standard Conditions of Approval. f. Install curb adjacent sidewalk on east side of Street "A". Said sidewalk to start from the drive approach southerly wing of Lot 10 on Copley Drive to the drive approach southerly wing of Lot 3 on Wilshire Drive. The parkway on Street"A" between the sidewalk and wall should be filled with cobble per Standard Drawing 542, Case 1. Work around existing sewer manholes as needed. g. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. 2. Vehicular access to private local trails shall be from Local Streets only. a. Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs or other diversionary devices shall be used. Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the side street. Provide curbside drain outlets for adjacent drainage devices. 3. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical except for the 66kV electrical) shall be undergrounded on the project side of Foothill Freeway (SR-210), along FCD access road to San Sevaine basin outlet, extending to the first poles off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. printed;713012018 www.cityORCms Page 6 of 18 E1® Pg149 Frcqe'ct # S LJBTT 19917 (�EQ,�'k2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location- - 022610230-0000 Project Type, Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT, Please be advised of the foltowing Special Conditions 4, The catch basi4is in Copley Drive need to be at the sump location. The 2 catch basins with 2 laterals shall be designed to handle 0100, a, Revise Drawing 2356-D to show how this 100-foot extension will connect to the existing storm drain, 5. Public i!mprovement plans sIi�a0 be 90 percent complete prior, to issuance of Grading Permits. Public i,n-iprovement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance, 6, A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work wiftri its right-of-way. 7 Corner property line cutoffs at Wilshire Drive and Street"A" and Copley Drive and Street "'A"' shall be dedicated per City Standards, firt Tract 17651 has partially installed the Community Trail, south of Lot 7 of Tract 17651 This developer shall reconstruct thr,, community trail full width. The existing trail is 15 feet wide and this developer shall dedicate an additional 5 feet to complete a standard 20-foot interior community trail. a. Revise City Drawing 2219 Sheet 14A, prepared for Tract 17651 to show the reconstruction,of the community trail. b. If lots 2 and 3 will be taking direct access to the community trail, provide single gates per Standard Drawing 1008, c. Provide "step through" for local trail access to the communilty trail per Standard Drawing 1007-B. 9, Tract 18122 is currently undergrounding existing overhead utilities on their project side of Foothill Freeway (SR-210), along FCD access road to San Sevaine basin outlet inctuOng the power pole east of your westerly boundary, The developer of Tract 18122 is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the undergrounOng from your westerly project boundary to the location of the first power pole easterly. The fair share amount has not been determined at this time since a Reimbursement Agreement has not been processed yet. Standard Condifions of Approval V1, A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first, Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map lis involved. Prklied 7/31V,2018 www.CityofRC us P m9e 7 v:f�iR E1—E2 Pg150 Project#: SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. kEnagilmmjsgejrvyi!sc�esart e t Standard Conditions of Approval 1Z Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed DD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs, 13. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 60 total feet on Copley Drive 60 total feet on Wilshire Drive 60 total feet on Street "A" 14. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 15a Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16,37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Copley Drive Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Prilirited P30�210118 WWW MYORC Us page:B of Is E 1®E2 Pg 151 oJect * Slp,Jl1BTT"119,917' C�EQ/k2Ol4-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: 'Tract 19917 Locabon.- -022610230-0000 Project Type Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Ena'mg1qng j� Q JSeryice�s Standard Conditions of Approval "17. Construct the foliowlng perimeter street improvements including, but not 11mited to: VWshire Drive Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees 18. Construct the following perimeter street improvements. including, but not limited to: Street "A" Curb & Gutter A,C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street "rrees Cobblestones 61111111111�m,d MO),201M wWW,CNy1.,149RK`,us Plage gc�f 18 EI—E2 PgI52 Project*: SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DR 2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- _ rtinerin rice Arlt Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1 Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified, e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer, f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 20. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Pflnred 7)30120118 %vww QtyofRC,w FlIage t O of I a E1® 2 Pg 153 SUBTT10191`7 DRC2018-00566 Project Name',', Tract 19917 Locafion* - 022610230-0000 Project Type, Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT„' IE " jq Services 11) Standard Coinditlions of Approval 21. install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed iegend (box betow) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line itern within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shad be installed per the notes aind lege:nd on Sheet .................. (typically Sheet 1)." Where. public landscape plains are recloired, tree installation in those areas shall be peir the pubfic iandscap e improvement plans. Copley Drive Bot anicali Name- C(hiWpa tashkentensis Common Name-ChRallpa Min. Grow Space- 3' Spacing -50' 0,,C. Size- 15 Gaflon Constructlon INotes for Street Trees. 1)All street trees are to be &nled in accordance with City standard plans, 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soft report shall be furnished to the City iinspector, Any unusual toxicities or' nUtrient deficiencies may require backfill soil arnendirnents, as determined by the City inspector, 3) A111 street trees are SUbJect to inspection aind acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per pubiiic improvernent plans only. Nkiled "M10,Q0118 F:1aair,,,, �I of 18 E1—E2 Pgl 54 Project#: SUBTT1 9917 CEQA2014-00023, DR 2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear an the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet — (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Wilshire Drive Botanical Name-Chitalpa lashkentensis Common Name- Chitalpa Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing-50' 0.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. Flidlirited 7tXQVIS wvm-C tyofRC us Page 12 W 18 E1–E2 Pg155 l�111-101jeict;#; S(AT11'1 90117 CE,1QA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Names Tract 19917 Location -022610230-0000 Project Type. Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review,Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ---n1in ring ices ear ent Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating� "'Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet — (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street "A" Botanical Name- Prunus blireiana Common Name- Flowering Plum Min, Grow Space - 3' Spacing-40' 0,C, Size 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans- 2) Briar to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector- Any unusual toxicities or, nutrient deficienc"es may require backfill soil amendments, as determned by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to ,inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only, 24, A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work withIn its right-of-way. 25. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 26. The developers all be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary, 27. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to finalle map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects, 28, Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies Involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that rriay be received from them. Fire Prevention / New ConstrUction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval ,:1018 www.CftycARC.as P1611111imi 7)M2 Flap 13 or IS El–E2 Pg956 Project#: SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CECT A Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the fire hydrant design & installation shall be in accordance to RCFPD Policies and Standards. b. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided, c. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 Spm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. 2. The architectural plans for the construction of the buildings must be in accordance with the current editions of the CBC Chapter 7A, The California Residential Code, the RCFPD Ordinance, 3. This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Seventy Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit 11-7 as High Probability-High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry as adopted by the RCFPD. it ing ars ices int Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Arch I tect's/En g!nee r's stamp and "wet"signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following; a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams,, f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans,, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or w,alls,, Printed 71302018 mAy Uyc4RC,us Page 14 09 18 El—E2 P17 Pf oJect#: SUBTT19917 CEG A2014 00023, DRC2018-00566 .......... ......................... Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: -022610230-0000 ............................................ Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ............................. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. u�l r rind safe ices rt erg# Standard Conditions of Approval 5, NOTE., The construction of this tract must be in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and/or the California Building; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. 6, The structures in this tract must be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan and The California Residential Code, 7. Proviide compliance with the California Residential/ ode Building Code (CBC/CRC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. 8. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 9. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 10. Thu,, Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordatioil-r and prior to issuance of Building Permits, 11. Construction activity shall not, occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m, and 6:30 a-m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays, 12 Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate, Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall' provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance, 1& Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i,e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC,, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit applicabion,. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts, Qjg�gn etit�� Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grayling practices, The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or, Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4� The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. F'InWed 7,30f21C IS %wmQ1yofRC.wis 113�,,age 15 of 18 E 1—E2 Pg 158 Project#. SUBTT 19917 CEQA20'oki-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Gragjngjjeic�rt Standard Conditions of Approval 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit, 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit, All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 11. Private sewer® water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 12. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 13. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 14. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough grading® prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11116111eld 71301201 H, %vww U1yofRC.us Page V3'of 18 Ell ® 2 Pg 159 [-:r0i e Ct rlrl: SU81 i RE)"I 7 CEQA2,,',) 14-00023, DR 2018-00566 Project Name", Tract 19917 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Varianre ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. 20±aQi2R9M Standard Conditions of Approval 16, Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storrn water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 17. The Water Quality Management Plan (VVQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the public sewer water plans shall be 90% complete as reviewed by the Cucamonga Valley Water District. In addition, the public sewer mains shall be extended to the westerly boundary of the subftlslon, 19, Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 20. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 21.,, Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculatlor-is for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (ie. a manufactured slope is not present). 22. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 23. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 24. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing, work on the adjacent property. . In the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fence, 4" thick DG surface, parallel drainage V ditch, bridge over V ditch where necessary for access corals, gates to corrals, S< 5% cross fall 2%, S>5% cross fall 4%. Water bars required at the spacing for the slopes shown respectively. 50' for 4% to 6%, 40' for 6% to 9%, 30' for 9% to 12%, 20' for 12%+. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill' slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 26 The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 27. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit, 11116111led T31)QW,B %vvAv Cly�,AR(,,us Page Wof 119 El ® 2 Pg1 60 U11,31"I"',pry 991 7CEQA20'l4 00023, E)I:?(,201 I a 0()!''i 66 Project NarneTract 19917 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project TypeTentative Tract Map CA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. g Gradi mginaititi fl Standard Conditions of Approval 28. On the rough grading plan and the precise grading and drainage plan the engineer of record shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3CRC 84013, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512,1.21CRCR703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Resodential Code. �vunPdi'Oed 713012,018 Rage le 0 IS EI—E2 Pg 161 s d STAFF REPORT DATE: August 6, 2018 Chairman d Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner I BY: Jennifer Nakamura,, Associate Planner SUBJECT, NI AMENDMENT DRC2018-00606m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA —A request to amend Title 17 of the MunicipalCode to amend requirements n standards for the development of Accessory Dwelling Units, also referred to as Second Dwelling Units. This item is exempt from the requirements of the Californian it n I Quality Act ( ) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15282(h), This item will be forwarded to City Council for find action. Staff recommends Innis Commission adopt the attached resolution recommending the City Council approve Municipal Code Amendment 1 0 , amending the requirements and standards for the development of Accessary Dwelling Units ( ), consistent with State Rancho Cucamonga has permitted second dwelling nits since the State first adopted regulations in 1982. Overt years, these regulations ave been amended as needed to be consistent it State In 2016, the State legislature passed three bills related to 's® Senate Bill ( 1069, Assembly Bill (AB) 2299 and AB 2406. The legislation al ri i that second nits would be referred to from this point forward as °s and effectivelynullified the it 's existing Second Dwelling Unit chapter of the Development Code (17.100). Cities have the option to adopt local regulations to implement t new legislation of default to State law for the regulation of °s. The legislation did permit a certain amount of discretion if local regulations ars adopted, Staff has developed new ter that outlines the development sts rds for 's, as permittedState I Implementationof SB 1069 and2229 becameata for jurisdictions as of January 1, 2017. Below are the provisions of SB 1069 andAB 22 applications will be approvedor disapproved within 120 days after a complete application is rain must be permittedr lot in allsingle-family zones or y lots containing existing single-family ha • The propertyowner is allowed to rent the ADUs, but it cannot be sold separate from the primaryAlin unit; • Attached ADUs may be sized up to 50 percent of the living area of the existing primary dwelling nit, with a maximumincrease in floor area of 1,200 square feet; E3 Pg1 PL...PNNING (;OMWSSION ',,;TAFF-` REPORT DRC2018-00606 ® CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 8, 2018 Page 2 • Detached ADU's shall not exceed 1,200 square feet; • Existing garages that are converted to At Us are not required to meet typical setback requirements; If an ADU is constructed above an existing detached, garage, cities cannot require a setback of more than five feet from the ADU to the side and rear property lines; Cities cannot require more than one parking space per, Cities must allow off-street parking requirements to be,net through tandem parking,within required setback areas, covered parking or extended driveways; Cities must waive parking requirements for ADUs that are: • within a If mile from public transit • within an architecturally and historically significant historic district • part of an existing primary residence or an existing accessory structure • in an area where on-street parking permits are required but not offered to ADUs • located within one block of a car share area Fire sprinklers can only be required for ,CCUs if they would be required for the primary dwelling unit; Local agencies may not collect water and sewer connection fees for ADUs that do not add habitable floor space; and, Local agencies must structure fees for ADUs so that they are proportional to the impacts on service demand. Implementation of AB 2406 is optional. This bill creates a new class of ADUs called Junior Accessory Dwelling Units (JAUs that are entirely contained within the footprint of existing homes J must incorporate an existing bedroom, include an efficiency kitchen, have a door leading directly to the outside of the house, and be less than 500 square feet. This new law also requires jurisdictions to permit JAUs without an off-street parking space and without utility connection charges. At this time, staff does not recommend implementing AB 2406 as part of the City's new ADU Ordinance because implementation of SB 1069 and AB 2299 will allow, for efficiency units as small as 220 square feet, thereby incorporating any of the provisions of AB 2406. ANALYSIS: After studying this issue in depth, staff is recommending that the City's existing second unit ordinance be repealed and that a new ordinance regulating ADUs be adopted in accordance with State law. As listed above, the new State law includes specific provisions that cities must implement. However, the legislation also gives cities a certain amount of discretion in adopting their respective ADU Ordinance The following includes an analysis of the provisions that the City can regulate as part of its ADU Ordinance along with staffs recommendations for implementatlon of these regulations. Ownershipand ccuarrcy euirernents: State law gives cities the discretion whether to require the property owner to live in either the primary dwelling unit or the ADU. Not requiring owner- occupancy could create a market for investors to acquire residential properties and develop ADUs to maximize rental income. As a result, the City could experience a surge in absentee property owners with little to no oversight of their properties, To prevent absentee property owners from taking advantage of this new law, staff recommends requiring owner-occupancy for all properties where a new ADU is proposed, E3 Pg2 PLANNING COMMlSSION STA1171F REPORT DRC2018-00606 — ClTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 84 2018 Page 3 State law does permit ADD's to be rented, however allows cities to prohibit an ADU to be used as a short-term rental (terms less than 30 days). The intent of the state was to broaden avenues to create additional housing to address current home supply and affordability issues. DU's also provide an alternative to market rate or subsidized housing that may provide additional units for low-to moderate-income households. To promote those goals, staff recommends requiring rental occupancy for more than 30 consecutive days. To ensure that these requirements will be met in perpetuity, staff recommends a covenant be placed on the property prior to the issuance of building permits to ensure that the proposed ownership and occupancy requirements are met. To assist residents in meeting this requirement, the City Attorney's office has prepared a sample covenant that residents can complete and record in the office of the County Recorder. ERLkLing: For those ADUs that are outside the State-established parking exempt criteria® staff recommends requiring one off street parking space per ADU to minimize parking impacts to surrounding neighborhoods. State law allows cities to require replacement parking for the existing residence when the property owner converts the garage to an ADD. The replacement parking may be covered, uncovered and/or in tandem on the property, Property owners will still be subject to maximum front yard hardscape maximum of 50% per Section 17.56.070, Maximum H ight: State law allows cities to determine the maximum structural height of ADUs. Staff recommends that the maximum height of a detached ADU not exceed 16 feet if it is within the rear yard setback to minimize impacts to adjacent properties. This is the current permitted maximum height for accessory structures and second dwelling units. For detached ADIJ's outside of the rear yard setback and attached ADU's, staff recommends that the maximum height of a detached ADU not exceed the height of the main dwelling unit to prevent ADUs from being out of scale with the main dwelling unit. Maximum ADL/ Size: State law gives cities the discretion to set the minimum and maximum size of new ADUs so long as the established unit sizes do not burden the development of ADUs. Staff recommends that new ADUs be limited in size based on maximums outlined in State law as shown in the table below. ADU's are required to conform to the lot coverage requirements for the zoning district in which it is proposed, which may affect the final size of an ADU on a given lot, Accessory Dwelling Unit Type Minimum Size Maximum Size Attached 220 sq. ft. 50% of main dwelling unit or 19200 sq, ft. Detached 350 sq, ft. 1,200 sq, ft. Setbacks: Notwithstanding the setback requirements established by State law, cities have the discretion to determine the minimum structural setbacks of new ADUs. Staff recommends that ADUs comply with the existing setbacks of the previous Second Dwelling Unit Ordinance. When E3 Pg3 [°"LANNING COMMISSION S'T AR7: REP(),RT DR 201&00606 — CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA August 8, 2018 Page 4 the ADD is located within the rear yard setback area, a minimum 5-foot rear and side yard setback is required. When the ADD is located outside of the rear yard setback area, the ADU is required to maintain the same setbacks as the primary structure, 29—sig State law allows municipalities discretion to ensure that new ADUs are compatible with the main dwelling unit and surrounding neighborhood, Staff recommends several design standards to ensure that new ADUs are architecturally compatible to the main dwelling unit, including the use of similar colors, textures and materials. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project [is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ( Ea) and the City's CEQA Guidelines, The project qualifies under Section 15282(h) of CEQA which establishes a statutory exemption for the adoption of an ordinance regarding second units in a single-family or multifamily residential zone by a city or county to implement the provisions of Sections 65852.1 and 65852.2 of the Government Code pertaining to ADUs, The proposed code amendment is consistent with this exemption. FACTS FOR FINDING: Per Section 17 22,040 of the Development Code, amendments to the code may be approved only when the City Council finds that the Development Code amendment is consistent with the General Plan goal's,, policies, and implementation programs. General Plan Housing Goal HE-1 promotes the creation of new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types, maintain a balances supply of ownership and rental units, and provide sufficient numbers of dwelling units to accommodate expected new household formations. The development of accessory dwelling units provides an opportunity for additional development of low- and moderate•income housing General Plan Land Use Goal LU-1.1 encourages the protection of neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment. The standards proposed designed to minimize impacts to surrm,inding and existing residential neighborhoods whfle ensuring compliance with State law, FISCAL IMPACT: The residential properties within the City are currently assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The development of accessory dwelling units will increase the value of the property on which it is constructed, and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. Accessory dwelling units will be subject to one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the increase in housing. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, -transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The proposed amendment does not specifically address a council goal but is necessary to comply with State law. E3 Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2018-00606— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONS GA August 8, 2018 Page 5 CORRESPONDENCE- This item was advertised as a public hearing with a large 118th page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. To date, no comments have been received by staff regarding this amendment. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Accessory Dwelling Unit Memorandum, Cafifornia Department of Housing and Community Deveiopment Draft Resolution of Approval for Municipal Code Amendment DRC2018-00606 CB.-JN/ls E3 Pg5 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK E3 P � ile ;o � I ,Im roe l e i II J I r r r 9 I I yrp f J� f r I I 9d � " '�/".. '�',i. ,,.:,'iii i '"I ✓ ,uS),��+p r iN�/ �a�r��L'Yp r 'I�� Yr`�k/%ll�rry� ��nmrcrfNm u�l�Gm� tl r 7G I I ( I 'll�l v m I I 1' "II I r © n �/I � / 1 / � / 1� rr �/ J J J�, / /J S ��orf �� 1w� � �j I �• ( 1, 7 r r r f JI .l � o r EXHIBIT A ,.c,�� „�„�rii� I�irc,,,:r,��/�%��//r�i/�r E3 Pg7 l aliiiiltents Uinderstand"urng AIDUs and Their ...... am.w.w... .............u, ,...w,.,.,.,..:,:,... .,".,,.:*.,,",w.d,.w � Summary of Receint Changes to accessory Dwelling nit Laws.,,,,.ww.wn„nn...............u,,.,. ,,, ...4.....,..,. 3 Frequently Asked Questions. Accessory Dwelling Unit ...............................n..:.:.,,,,... ,w,,, ,"... .. ...... Should an Ordinance Encourage the Dew-nloprnent of ADUs?, . ...w, y Are IE lsting Ordinances NUH and Void?.. Aire Local Governments Regwred to Adopt an rdinanr.,:e? 8 Can a Loca, Government Preclude ADUs? ,, 3 Can a Local Goveirinment Apply Devetoprnnernt Standards and Designate Areas?.., am a Local Government Adopt Less Restrictive Recli.iifernents, Can Local Governments Establish Wnimurn anct Maxinnuurn Un4 Sizes?, g Can ADUs Exceed General Plan and Zoning Dennsuties? ....,. . 10 How Are Dees Charged to A.DUs"? l D Gnat ILltilil:y Fee ReqUireiments Apply to ADUs.. , .... .. -11 Tat t..ttiiuly Fee Requirements Appdy to Non,pity and Cormty Service Distrk is? ..... ... .... Do Utility Fee D equ.uirennnents Al:rplly to ADUs within Existing Space? (Does Tuublio Transit" Include w itlniin One-half Moe of a Bus Stop and grain ,3[at'ion? Can Parking Be Regu.uired Where a Cesar Share is Available? 12 Is Cuff Street IParkiung Perrnn4ted lin Setback Areas or throu,ngh Tandem Parking? 12 is Covered Paarlking Required? .._ ..... ,... ... ........ 12 is Replacement Parking Requ,.niiied When the Parking Area for the Prrmary Struuc:,tuure is Lised trnn. an AIDVIJ?. Are Setbacks Required uired hern an E istirg Garage is Converted to an ADU? .-........ 1 AreADUs Permitted in Existing Residence and Accessory Space?... 13 Are Owner C cx:a.uupants d equ.nired? . ......... .......... ......._..11-1111111-1- .,:. ... ..... .,......, .....:_.: :....._.:, 111.3 Are Fire Sprinklers Il Required for ADUs?. ...,.,,,,. 13 Is Manufactured Housing Permitted as an ADU?.... .......-....... 1.4 C;.arn an Efficiency Unit Be Smaller than 220 Square Deet? ..... ... .... . .. .............. 14 Doves ADU Law Apply to Charter Cifles and Counties? ..... ........... , .. ......... 14 Do ADU;:A Count toward the Regional Housing Need Allocation,..,,. ................ --- „ .,. 14 Must,Orduunanoes Be Submitted to the Department of IHousing and Community Developrmennt? ...... 15 E3 Pg8 Frequently Asked uvstion :Junior Accessory DweMog UbN .. ... ... ,.,.. .....w.. ...,....w 116 Why a dopt as JADU .....,,. . .... .......... 17 Can the JADLJ Be SoW Mde�pend nt of the f�rirziary �„�� V��u��:,��.,. '1 Me JADUs Subject to Connection aad Capacity Fees? 1 Are P)ere Re u O-P-renlN as for Fire J;beparal ri and F ke KNaa 9er°? is rarA. ...., ................... ... . .4. l'! Machmen! 1, Stab.Aory r.hairrges (MerauUUndedMe) ., 19 erre, acV7meni 2 Sample Jew U W:ra race 26 AlAcNim! SamMe JADU Ckdoame ... .... _.. 29 AlAc1uNraraq. T SJMe MGM ChecWht... .. _. . . ........, . .. 32 E3 Pg9 Accessory 1i 1 II41 It _............... dtifurinra's hioiusin� ~r'uWuucfnrn is �r�rf keeping pace with prfhM pool 1 fw tio,i ...n y �rgrcn�r7rn��arnirp. Ilrn 'flhcilast��e�cau,,� less pll�usr�n q°uaqf of'flhru.roe�edeld p gnenu horn uas Iq:au.uiillt. Thiis lack,of gouruu!nfn is iirqusu fuia,rg affrairrGat:Y hllllf'y i'lhha aveiraigie ht:iiusing rnosfs in Caltifolrrlla ui^ s ar Ali ow lf�� lueccirle�sonoY�a�riequoraikulr� uce Ie� f'fr�rlo rroust,,. ,� rgiihw� �rrensf6c Ibr' roe quare„ uun �s freirI h�crne anqr� f6air��lu � ru wl'mr 'hey work, j Ir r.gruiuulI)Ile uqu'l sh ire space, both of hiclYn reduuces �1 r ' negativew . �qu�IluR��eS hi�f� � irnraY pnr�rn�a�uroces� �ern�iiir�r:urnrnu�u�af��YunM p ° unpacks. i u �r ilr. as�� w� a ey�u�ral �urr� n�o�anl�nq u�re�arll��l�irtCuroS��rnar IRuru ,auuirq lr veruurnrueraf st.ibsiidized qrr i 'ucpuurun a,and pa reservasfor:airu thea°e C:10Unr O,,:o'Y I Karen croappile,uuCSir."rikeuey air, alfeirnsfve IIOLISing rn dOs I errer urer 's ti-tat c r confr'glbrut:e to,adid,ressirn,g horrne siuulCaply sial 'fficirdslipugfk',y urn Califirrnl0. Ohre such e✓uairnlpplle gNrung pOra)p'r lair ty are Accessory IID' e",going U naps (AIDUs) (allisirro rn4erreird fin.. as second uurnIs, fn,_ I,aW Units, cr,r irsrnrny fats). What is act ADL.1 ,An AII.::;IYU lis a seciarn ary deggrrq i wiffi cc,iri q,;Iete irrndepeun eril ggv'irn,g facflldlffes'for one or immure (persons in eirneragll,y'R.nulf(re:a three 6unirmns° Detached, The a,urnnh is selpu rsfuer:q from Ellie Iprimary Spr'ruru'huure Atfac'her"; "Tle u~uruiif is etfa°ncherd tc'hlYne Ilmprirnnary sfruucprure I,[.:uuurppr;p,r ecl E'c1sting Sjwpcee Space I within the prgrrn ry rusn idenc is converted into an Iirn� e eonupern�q;Ilq�Wrrq unit a.�u.ur;rc�wr�u;,�r�es�s�rnr°��pa<�r�pp�'rh �f�urr��n �;�;anumniill�P;nir feu irelpa�rurpa�nsertl spnsrcaww nreuq�lh��r nreu°q�uauus sfu°e�er�'8lirniin°nrc� nm'nesuur�es AM Is anff'er°Ilae'rnefifs ftiiak addiress cuurraumnrniri dewaaellcp,q'urnneunf Ibrarriiers saruc,lln as as'ffor°dr"albihty erns ernwuliruurnrneruW q uMiity �ADIUs are Burn eiffcrirpalUllle 'f.ylpr'e sof q"nlcr e to cormtruucf in p;w„e[f'r:ar6ia beta lune they dic re UirieIEn�agiin�g 'fund°qisrnd:, rrnal”or uniew lirufuas'friuir;'fiuurel, sf:uur¢Iiuiired parkiirq or ellevef�oirs !s are (kuru']]with cost-ef'f'ectivie oirr e�-ger NoI' c..),Dd fr�erune r:.rwunstruuctgcu'n„ hnuclfn is siiirnq'fgceunfly lens I than Ihormnes iiirn rnew rn UlItifarrnily iirmfigh Ibl uild ra s, ADLJs cern IpiroVide as miuich kvirng space as the new apairtmeirIls arnrq l;nruiillp n;un inew hrnfiki Ib ui'Ukigs I serve viery weH frac`COLIples„ srmnegll'farnnliiiies, frgennds, 'youurn Ipecfalle„ and suer'irur°s. q,,,Jis usire a clifprnu°ern'!t,frc: Into a iluirfl or DIU. h m lrn u� ern nfiif N not�Viust Ipnlcoglc� liiun�g the1p,a�ce, but I �klhi� '� orrrnw�c wire � r° s � �w,re�Rll„ �^who c ain Unn,•in bll�,•n�pl�u'Rihl n rec,n rive an exra rrnanrn'klhn y relrnf inclarriie. AD'l, s giw--.n hromecmineirs the f exiiUliify to share Rmnc leperii1diemnt 8nnaiiii ng r:'Aireas w0hn f muifly nnei m heirs aind unrtll°uer s, allllcnMlrng seinlim:oirs to age iirri p°nllarw as t4r.:.T Irequlili°ne more caire and h ea p:niiu°ncg extendied fair-r-Olkes to be Irn ar oine another wuw,r4ulbrn rmn plrnf6liuniinig plrpvac;y. Relaxed Ir(.:giull'afRoiris and khie cost to Irnu.,uHl R ann AIDU Ifvu ke it a veiny feast bileN affoirldaWe p",cm.n!slimng lopfilam, A t,IC BeirkOey study noted that curncµ luirn'p'f of affoirdaIWle hou§lirng in the Ray Arlea costs mntxiii.fl 55,40,10010 fco d velh pnu ry heireas«::uuu XCn4...J cairn marnge an"nywheirlo ulpm to $200,0010 curl the expensive errild ii in Uuiliglln fmrun.nsm"iig cost airea!s. �Xf:'P'p•••Is are a ccri iico ll furin'n c)f linfllllf-1evieRcrogmeunf fpn lh ecu mn b aflf� rd's Ib�e a n�d cnffeir ri 1port inll,Ihn�usling cpn6dce s nwylRfl°nRn exii!sfling Inn iip; l°n'borl11rD ods: f"nU..,U!fn alre un gcoo, eri.ull type of Ihncnu..n§iimng uu°npf because t net ailllow foir afuffereinf n•usc;s, aind s,e!irve, different p op:;an•u'R@llions m IrugRlrog 'flrarn s'lucueirirls ai ncf pnouxulrng if,or"cnfe si ora6lls 'pcn ycua.namg frurnnlilies, p,nu''µ»copnlle wlith d'isalknli!lRIes and serOor cu!'iUzein.s, By idesiligin, AIDU.)s aire airirrilore affnirdal;�lip ammcp can piriovidie acpcfii'Ipcornall ilrnclame to l oir-mn mnwrners. L=M 11 g r � : u:rntl„wm'nit of�M1I��•,ps r68",:p nlrlrnlf�r'q've ,.:i1c„»r�"„ss to. uiCPIfU.'.a„ ieldu '"s:n'fioirn a iris R !ser'�o-"II'G'dn'm fc-m. coou��rrnun°n�u°nR.�n u•*rnrn n::.Irn��o�uno�c��^l•�� nun•�R�co, ~ru nny Cull ifrnruniiann , 2 E3 Pgi 1 u irn n� m it y af eca��llcui haw� I es "to uw mm uu� �uuuuuuu¢ h �m mw�. niie Califlorni� I1egirskah.vr�E�-.,flu.P d and d cqi;:,Ire w arna �°,pl��up ��t�la�arnrtllpl��n��ppgh ��u �g��,r�ltodurriillr�dVllilr�� unrritS ( ` I and ,ar�arilyd ��uNriii�� ra� llry rental hrrr§ling guard are rr r " k° nip�housilra pr�rc`rd� in r � Ir'rv'Sir�ri�ll�w ��uaVrr P�nrn�"rrlt Ilrr �rdKdlra,,„rr" t �MvtOuilPini, Ow....-mr,the years, ADdd Ilrvuw ll,-Pas Ilaleri revised r w to iirinljpirove its effectiveness SUch as a ecell Pt r.drani �,rwl 2003 to tum 2017, P changes to AM d dawn O11 durrthier reddiuci,e to rrrr•r° „ �bletter stirearrallirae p:wov all acrid d.xp ar-O cap actty to ccorwrnruruarUate tJfa adevie4qIpmeM of ADIUs AD. s awry.,, in r..rlra'iliqluiie p,q:fucwttxnrty tio ard�rdress a varli Ry iad� t lcusior°rp Ineeds ani d p.:wlrr:Paria:ie affoirda[AP Itroua u,rur 'r„ria t w �clfu'tdr rarvti for fawwrrtlly irrwr^rrnta r . friends, struder,rt,„ the in-1," urrw health care porromr tiers, Ilik°w�e sdosat led, n uu.rr i �'�1r�afl4,iar m ra ru lu�A hu' Il irrllru r y and Otll��lreM II urTtIller, i i Inlorljplort�u nr tyto raiximr rr nid intelg,We Il lw..0 rokv chuuo'cns wi'h.hilii exustiing nieiighborhirrolds Within the arrarRext, thu. Department,II Pas da'o"r'Ip ared tlhiiS Cpuiiidndrwlrice taw sssr s,t bcurd gOverrwlrrweMs iIii eiriiCDUraig�lrbg the deveioprlrn nt oVADIUs 't for tlhp � r pgc^.'de t til.ut ulry Changes 'dllalIt gp,ua rrn liu Ik lri d` ruwu lrir�airy of tllwlre chainges For wkacll,-w II„rrdd_ r AILS E rl, `<</II :r,. k", ": B1106f.) (C,3rapteIr'7210. Statutes s fired ;d0dd„a) mi,sev rall r:ah��,wrngies'Rirr adirdress Ibarr.,rairs� tau t'tre ddievea quirunz-.rnt of A)p,.hs and expanded cwalpair,dt,y fov t,,re'r dee lloturrwen't The totlliamng .w tauu ll ,su.,rrrarlrwar�,y of pirawrisrururvra thal go Into effiacd Janil.mry 1, 210,17 Piarkirrg Sl::;t .p 10619 redmur,:,ms parking rei pur irrerruf..�rPts R,,,a one spaar,e per bedroom or ru'rwtt, II her; gi!.Aabior°r authorizes Doff si,,Vwr,:.t puii,rrki N:w The t nclli.rn nor in setback, a r-Oes'u„alpel 65c,,firradrngs such as fire a n d W'e safety c�onndd,°.urws are miu ,,die S 'I ID69 gat so p:ur�Naha pardaJng reclluu rerni,, rrts ' the ADU meets any a::ut the d'�rp omiirwgy� Its w4lun a haft rrwtpn;;r t'rw:rdaw pur.rb ir,tra ns R, Its vMhprw an architecturally and hi to6c dmirurrt. ps part prat an exhi0fi ng prdrnary res'uderr r. x arP exisfing accessii::wy s't.rr,.c'turr,'u Is fru an area meher�e an-striee''t parking p ru"U-wilts ars r��:pll..u'dr a,��t„ but not offered to the occupant of the ADD, ps liacialtief.1 wd'thlrr one Mock,prat a rr.:r r::,wh re area. E3 Pgl2 Fees SB 10619 Ipirlovidles thatAlDL.,i!s!sh6k rmt be cion§idieireid new riasidieirii!UM uses for the Id UllrlPOSEu C)f CUiClUllaHrng k.,A10fty cioninection fees or ca1::)a6ty cl,iiairges, iincWidiiing water and sevversiri.,air0c;e, Tfiiie WEI prohibftsa llncall agency froirn relqt,6rtng an AIDU aptAic;airit to drnstslli new or sepairate iu,fifiry conn eratio n or iimpose a reWed r;oininectilon fee or capacRy cl-imirge fcw ACYUs ffiat are cointaineld withiiiri ain existinig resiclienlcir.:, or accessory struirtUre, Ficn"attached and detached AD'Us, tNis ifee or ci"iiairlge rmurst b Iprqd ortioriate to trine bUrdlen of tll,,pie lunrR on Ulm viater,or seweir systieirr,n and rnay not exceedtans reasoinabIlle clost of l,,)rn,O,&iinl ti--ue service 1:'lire Recphremeir-As SB '1069 pIrOvidips fft,@t fire sprinl6ers shaH not Ibie recjt.jiliireld iiln an acicessory unit of they airy not require ibrr the phirnziry resiidlsync;e Al')Us within Existing Space Locai gioveirinimeints rniust rniinii!!:AieriEdy aIjppirluve ain appHiraltion to wftNin a s4iglle faimi!y resiiideinUad zoirie one )IDL) liper siiinlg[e farrflly [M if the UIrIllit iis: cloirndl26irileld willIT-iiiiri ain existing ICesildence or accies!soir,y!stirLnCI[Llir,E,, has iiridepeinclient exteirior airciess froirin 'Hie e dstdlrn Ire§iidleincie. lia!s !side,,andrir!setbac'k!s,H--ii�at ,sure sLji,ffiir,,ieait,foi�'fili,'es ,fety. hies e provisions apply Mthiin Wl s4-nc.,1 1le farNOY r'le:s�CIlPlrVtk.,ll ZOIrlIES all-WAIDL)s viilth'M exJstinl niust be 61[0)Neicl irl 9 space r aH of ffiilese zoirms, Nio alddRiiinrmd parkinig or other�clevellopmen,,nt,!s,t�air-ndairids,cair,ii be ajppltiield except for bm,,nHlcfiInlq code reqUirerneirds, llto `Totall l:::liirchUbRion SlB 1069 p:lrioNbits sl docal Roviernrneint,fryr- aidop6ing anordmairase that prielClUdes ADt Is C, (,I, Genir.-,raHy„ AB 22,99 (Cl-taptler 73:5, StatiWes icnf 2016) reciLfilres a 1ooaV goveirinirnient(begin6ng January 1, 2017) to nniriWebaCly appircme AID(Js ff dine urA with cerlain l:,)airki�ng reir.p.hremeints,, the rnaximurn atimmaNe Mze of airs attw.hed ADU, and sletback as foHows: D '11',he unft hs not inteinded: fa:lr sa,,e separate fronn jprurnary lassderice w1lid Ir nay be Irented 0 Flie 111011 ds zoiried for sung'e-famfly or rnuRJfi:,lrniy use aired lcolrllta4vw.,d sural exisfling, sirt.qlle-fV'.3mlRy dweifini!„J. The luiriQ lis efflier aftached to airu ex,l!:,Afirq dwleHing or Ilurr.atksd within iR,ne Wing area of th,iie e)astiir,q&xe,11mg or lcletac.rims ld arrd inn'thle saimellort. rlie inicireased floor airea of the uirnft doies rmt sexceed 50`Xn of thii:.:exu.:,'AHng kvinf; arleal, wlitl,n a rim6muirrii increase infiolor area of 1,200scrim are fist. The tota, area of floiorspace for a ldetaO,iiield 31COP-SSOFY dvvelhir,g arvit does, nir.A exceed 1,200 square No pzlssageway can ble reqL&eid No setbalck cari lbe reqL,6red froman exhsbng garagethat lis cioinveirtield to ain AM.) 4 E3 Pg 13 IW, orun�Oparnce worutdn do1cm bnuiillcdrrug c^ k:p �reutunr�r urn nts, ,pprcunra'R by the piocd IInesllthi ruff oeu' werh hire Ilurdwato sewage r.ispirxsal,systeirn is beuirucu,useid. Impact on Existing Aces solo, w shin Urdt f�"�u" 'hid��antc ' AB M:.;'9 Iprcuwhaf s that any existing ADU oirldinaince that dines rmt meelt idhre bili S requ it rru rats is null asrnlb'voiiirf upoirii the chats tlhara bufli b;;crairri s a,affe(,:''dwe. Ilrn SUc'ihn cases, a i'uar'psdii � ctiVcurn miust, s,pa,prove acesscnry rdwsOddng uurnhUs'bssied on oveninrnn rnt Gode Siec6carn 1658,52 2 a.nrut!Idl tlhne Uiuuruscducilhrarn sudrapu'ts s icurrrnprallr rnt ou +r usrnoe AB 24()6 (Chat aikn:^r 755, tatiLutes of 2O'l 6) icireala°s nore filex:bolutwy fnr.d,-uoiLasuawg optQ ()u,,so b,Y ausl:l,,noru,z.'oa a �oca9 w rr'ru rants Uri t rrrndt Durr°aic�r rsc;;�„ ss y u:UwwcMddoo��pU routs N tdnr� ur ln rsru r::aira.:Nor°u racw::a Tdn bndp defines.,J/� II.Jls ta:a be uarnnt tfmt caruinot exceed 500 sa:puaar're fet and must be crarrupal:uaMy c,uu'arntspi,,,aeuf wuruthnrru the slnmr,rra r:nf raun a nrusturag rrna:r'de of a�stn.ictuir e din addition, the b10H rana;fOes specIier..J corrnl„roi uerats for a orrfiraarncea�NrR,::'flJorn of a JlAIDU r„ar°cdaraarucrn is uup Hornell Required IC on-'Apo: e n'tz i'°Ine oaa.Jiiunan,,;e aiuthiorrzed by N3 a+°406 rruu.uM irnciu de the�P`cfk3wa ng requudr rraeints Lh'unit to one JADU per Iresiiafr;ntW pot zon c, forsu>ngfi—rarnniihy resid ruce,s vwdd:dn a sin lle-'ff mRy resWenceWready Wit reran the lot. "i"hur::a r:in lle-'fia- mudy re!Md nce iiru wrrfn"ichu thea JAM its created or JA IJ must be =,,;iupie d by the owner of the residence, TIhur:'owner rrnuast record a deed restriicturnru statdrng tGnW the JADU c,sinanW be Waud s pararatedy ffrrarru the sdraagU - fsnndhy resub ince and r striicturaug fh e Jau''uDILI lCo the sue Il rradtatursrrs Jnr'W other r qu.adremeruts of'the Jl,ADU.J orduraarucz, "Fh JADU must be located entu.rMy wwuthnurn thne rurutstdrnW structure of th-ue sdon e-ffarnfly residerme and -,tAD U have its own sep arMe eintruari cua. Thee JADI'J must'pric6de an efficiency dr, O-mira nrah ichu in6udes a sirik, ccrodcua g apphancu ti m,::ou.unllier surface, and stunr ge cabinets thnant meet minimum m h.au..ri'kfirupg code standards INIo fess or 220V circuitsare aliowwed, The JI,,DLJ rn"nay share a brafhn nuOt n the p`rriim ary res[de ncca or have tills b,aath'n. Pro[diHlbut cl 'Cliompirments This bid paroWbits na locah JA'd'JU..J carafiionaw:u e fro na r+equ n n : Additional paualrlrciir°n as a crwrud4'pa„ars fa,a i9rarnt a p errrutd /kppIy4'ig racda:UstuonM water, si, w er a nrd pnravna,,,r r.,;onnecflcrrr fees, 190 cornrn ctu ins are rnee,,:du::ud as tkmse uutud'utp s love already br, irate accounted for in firm o d urn 'd perrruut for f'w hie::rrne. 1 Fire Safety Reiq ILI lrerrieiirltts AiB 2406 ciliarifies that a JX1 AJ isto bie cioinsiiideired pert of Ui-iiie, siingle-'FaiririJky resildencefor the puq1t:mses cot fire ond fifC' P11'ro �sord�iinances l regit.illaUorI sudill �as S�J:�a'inldier,,s airiild sniiul e arii-ins. Tli-iie bi'H '.Osio r1eqii..firf.-.s life..., anid ..�t.�,ictiior kW protectioin oirdinances that affectsinglle-farnlllly riec.;idii:,inices to Ibe qpq)1kilaid uiniffoirrrilly to alt§Inglle-fair6ily iresideirices, reigarOess of the presence of a JADIU, J:AD U, in 'i in thel 11RI INA As [::*rt of Ove. iiiiousu kriig le,lierrieirit 1::iloirtk.1111u ofVillica:ir genell'41 p:Ykan,l lor;,M gioveirirnrnmart s i recj1I,.flired tc)ideirvfify Mh aI::qprq::,n-ia tip z1or-iiing Chat wfli acc;oirnriI t:)rojecleld hious:k q i lin tt-'ueiir regional Ilucu.0 iiriiig niell (IRFUNIA) and rq1plart ointh&iir I:orogmss t:::oiuirsiumint tic.) Giavernmeiriit i Section 6540,C), "T'n credit a JA[.)1U toward H�e R11 11'4A, HOD i DepaiiI I Ftruance I ii.ifilkzle Uhecerrsus de-finifiori I h1OU.-`J111C1 I wKicl'i is fa:iidy filex,i i:ll e, I i goveirruineirilt i urilitsas' pa�@irt of repoirfiirug to DOI iAM...is imleet thesie dehinifibins and thist)HII lium.flid i I and coluntiles to earn cireidittovairid meeting their R1 RIA altocrifions 1:ray1:rerrniffir'g res�lidents to c realle IIess IaccessiDirly uriiits, Se!e adchiblomA diisc;ussbirii ,DAM.,•V frequir.,mUly askif,,,uid c1luestions. 6" E3 Pg 15 I As��ked Questil 1 11 011s"1111111 Accessa�ryl Dwellillng U�tiillts i1-11 CC)LJ ra(lig e t T'i e Yles, ADIU IUaaw and reciE..,int Bchainges lllca aldidiress banieii"s, stireanihriie approvia'� and i potential capaicRy fix AOL)s recloc nizlling their uiinilqwiiimlportaincle in addiressik-q Cahforin:li a's hou!Mng nee�ds T'ile pire parinUoin, arneindiineint mid Pmplemlvntation of IIoi:61 AIDU orlOnvIll"IrPS IMUst ll,:ale i oull corvsp!Ment wi&['n GloveirnrTmint i Sipiction 65852 1510 ,(a) The Legislature fuids and of thelollolwig(.1, (1)Accessory diwelkii-q.1 units, are as valuablu form lor'bousing ki cl-alifornia (2)Accessory dwelffing units pro ale housing lorhnliiiilp,(mend5ers, sitidents, the eldey/Y funhorne health care providefs, thlE,",Chsalbled i Whets W li viiairk,�t pricestwithirn (misfinq neitAborlmlods (3)Hoineimmers who ueate acicessoy iChvewgggrap,g units beniefil from adriFdirlic"onlic, ind',ui iim,;,,feaseidse,nse of SICTUrIly (4),Afloloung z=essoly chvellm,pg unds ia single,farvidy oirina/ld'Catudy lrc�,Sklonliillzonespovidels hwisingslock in Cafforoia (5) Caaloin airi h.-?ices to soveire housiog i 1(6) 'Fhe stalp i i lars,horl i reeling ciisimenil and future housing clempairldwill? sefious conseiqupne,�:ies,W HO statie s, eiconomy our ability tobuild green infill C."onsisitent lua ith sflnlegreen,house g,as reitluiction goa/is, atiici the well being ofour citizir,,,ms, pail"ir."lillarly lolwle,r,awliniddle-mcome ei.mn,ers (7) Access wy�.Jwiellingunils ofk'Irli Cost llliraiusing to vTwel the treie(Js OfexisOug i fultue residewits vi cmi,sting neiqhborhoorls, whUe respecling archilivich,wal charaIciter, (8)Accessoty(hv6,j/jrgg uItrits alle, thwieforp an essiontial componeul of Imusing suPply, (b) i ft intent iof lfie I ic,�gislafii thait an a(',',C"l(u^^,SSI0l(Y, chvelfifig unif orcliniance i0c)pteid by as locaI rigency i the effeirl of prolvirliq I for i creation Graf accx� Sso�y dwelling lutifle, rind that provisrous 0 this c)rr.finance ria,O,twgi tomalters Ifficludingi unit sizel, parking fees, i other requaievuemits, arf,,, i srbitrary, excessilive, or btudensome !,„o as lo umez.�,sir.),oiabl f resiIiii the i of,home,mvners tio create acciessoly divivolling i in 3 v zones in whish they,af e auithorivid by 10,cal orcfivarlc(.u. 7 E3 Pgl6 Are El),,II s t I n r..11 Y I I a IInd R ar y� Yes, auny Ilanc�all parr i nairuca a'llr„nIptei G purl air 10Jairn.nary 1, 2.017 that is i Unn Israurn,phairnae ro iUhi the chiainigesto ADU paw X11R be 'r i' '�'v✓yl�rr"r(��ya ' rnuO and n ou d Until an ordYrnaouca is adopted, I ncM governments nts nrruns1,aIC"IE°u1'y statestandards" (See: Atta�cllninrvarnl 4 for Sfata Sfia�uudu:nrd�s shulaickpii�sf). in f�fDa alksser•nce of a Yo�eia�p ord;iinairme cnirnplying withY DU lavi, Y)ca' rirrview nruUSit ba hrnitad 1�o<.sitalre sfairolarils"ainid cannot include a iditlrrunall reigl nllr�erii silui1n s those rrl alrn a'x�D.s'1unnig ordin rme Are �C. .al Url •..,1IIu !d`1n'1111 n71 No, a Ila calivernmeiriiiY'Y nit re ,urn'irei ' 1ira adol:rrt yarn ordinainie Ai 'L)s IbUi;:1 Wilftmiiu.1 a ju.ur1s.-,,dYi1iiu n that lacks a local u�au°rliiuuaru�:a n�nu�sf��Pnn°ulYnll�urorpllhn sf�a'Ya�'�n slarnrf�ara:l,s ��n�'b�n:,^��ulf,arnllnirnnau°nf � �ac,U�caY,nfnua�rU am r:airunUYnuau^n�ra unarm aman';rnuar 1'hnrrnu•r�Y°n different forms siuic1n as aa r iew rsr�a.:luruairwiaaaunnerurinnnairut ftii arn snxti isliknni1,U oir&narnz�e, s�el::a,air,a11s^section sur special rei,9 UllMlirunns unAH11iiu°n the zo niirng code agar urofsun radar lnnfa:u the zonung czc.h.;a by rllu:sfric t 1..1anavrunrar„ the orrUiiirnarucr, slnrun.ullrf be es'kaat:ihsllhie U leigisWwie'Yy 'ftrrnu ghl a p,nuvu&:anus process and nni saunc:9 YrnlCerrnal ardr'rnlirniistriaflvr= ac'tioins sn.ch as mer'nnos or zornlrn p nnulaNrp°irrufn::nllirnan.s a MSI i iL. I�wl!,, 6:.1 it ,i r"�i`��R n I Y`l Y �,a. ,�i�.0 li � I`wlsn IlOcal ng(Wn .sunnir eir"f aarnnnrnil Ipredluna::la ADl•,Us E1ate �/," hork,,a"S, Yes„ Ilasa';acall goviernnirnnarnls nnrnay apply daysnlrn,prmuarnl standards and may diesii irnafaa where arnJCw) Us are lserirnrniilfad PC � ecili 6:5852 2(a)(1)(A) arid (ICI)) However, DI ;;.; wuflhulnn existirig sfuuuzla..ures tm.,rsf be allio iia.:ll iuirn i:3111 sYru lle fairruiilhy res u;Ya rn'YuaY z:sairnn;ns Fzuu AI IR. s 1.pnaf irsnrywiira aru ar;lrllul•ponn can°a irnaw acicessory'SULIctuire,, d's'velra14an'ruannU s'1,airrdards sUdh as 1:nasrQ iri , 1'nam 1'nU„ peal covierage, Ii size aancU unnusrriirnnuuirrn u•urut size raga be estalbLisheld wu'11u easrlaiinn hrrnufafiioirrs, Af"pl„Us rsaun be avrnuclecf or Wilowed !IJlnircnau In an ao°na Ylllary aairnrl.separ'afa diiserafiirnnraary pnrrnacauws in areas ii111n 1naaIlltYu and safety ihi,slks suua h as 1nli lln fire fmzard areas. 14...1linwever, sfarDia•:1ars airnd @'Hiowaf:nlla aris,as U�n•asf not be dieslgin�rrc^d or+alY:uphed in a rinarnu"ier'that „ A „buirde s the reu[ maxrrzefhie � fuer AE::;U1..J r evielba,pu'e nU. Des'iigriiakiling areas n 1vere I D1••Us are a 1r.,narrarU spurniuulld be aapjprrna:l-'nerf f;oriirnnarii'1'on Ihnea;lihu asrnd safety 1ssues YrnsllirnrUiirni rsrlar„ sewer, il:ra'ff1a: owfliannrp publhc isafety,, Uf11o�z1ir'u,9I aIPIG:nir�Dadlhnas sUalhn as ires'16z'1Yva overlays, xmibin, AIM Is to Yrcieir lot sizes, buirdensorne 1rnt coverage airn d safli nicks and pairtiici ullarlly s r:nrennfrafiirnnn a:ur r#ns'1a::nunce requirerrne nls (e,19., turn pass'fllnaun f;O if�a�a1 bieitvv�eern Ali nioay u••urn"a,a sWI,B ly riasfirlr;f the ability sof the IY'voririieo� iriers to creafie AIC_L.Us, coiritrary to f.1ae iinnfsrnnf ref flora Il....aglislatura. Z1 E3 P17 R�equidng lairi.':e it aurnum Ot sizes rand not aflowirig sirnalker q:)t Yii for, DIL.h.,can severely restrict the�lr hpovasntiali deveopment, For example,, large mirilirniurn liat,sizes'llbr AM..Jis may caristrict capacity throughout rnoslk of the cornmunit, , llkn4num, lot sizes cwmol�be apphed to ADIJs within existing structures and could be considered reWUve 1,10 heafth avis:J s::Ifety concerns such as areas an septk;systerns. While larger lot sizes might be targeted lfor various reasons such as ease of compabbility, rnany tools are available(is g., maxinnurn rnaximum lot cover eragim', minif,nurri seU,.iaf,:-,As, arcl--iitectuW and [andscape reclOrernerlits) ftiat;-,:iRmns AD Us to fit an %i the bi,iA environment'. ""i Gv,,,ert,"vr'ient, Rr.a�sfi'iCtive 'Yes ADU Law is a irniin muirn reqWrerneril aii,iiid its IC in.N'�Plose is to pincm.,uraigie the devOopirnien't ofADIUs Local air ,ernwierits can takle al v,F.iniety of achions Ibey,oind the siatute-11hat pirornolle All:::)i.,Js st,u::1-ii as reidUCH(Nns in fEwes 'I ss re;isliricb,vie parking ior unit sizes or, airner6noj gieiner4l ip!m,-ii polticies Santia Cn,iz buss confronted a shortage of housing for.many years. cons.�dering g Rs grovAh in pu::rpuiabon from Lm-,'arn4v students alt UC Santa CinJ2:and its piroxinuty to SHiicr.,)n VeOfey.The cAy PrORIOted the developmerrt of AM Is as oppioirtijiriiiity MrOLPG,:jh various str tegtt ies suich as u.reating ia ffisnUal ft) priornote ADUs i"he rruaniijai showasses prototypes of ADI Jis and outlines cRy zxming 1aws and requk'pirriirrnts to rnake it more Minviu:mieii"4 f(.-)!r hiomeowners to get infnrmatiu::)r-u, '.t he City fm,ind thal horneownpirs"6EItake th-ne to dev6lop airi ADU i if infoirmahon is easy to find, the process is sllirnple, airiiid t'heu its siuffident,r It,iii,danice oirii what olpfiansthif,..Ny Ih ave in reigairds :k::u des:iign and panNng The i set R-ie rriiiNrriurn lot slizie reqt,kriernent at 4,5010sq 11, to develcip an ADL) in awarder tin eincolurage rnr.Iiire I'mmies to bidilld an AIDU, TiNis Mowed for a rrial,Dldty i su,ngle-fam Ry hon-iies in Santa ('.,,ruz tio. develop an ADU For r'nore inforrnWiion, see III nfyIlprUnr a!tir p�qqrgrn P.s s i r.: Rll�uyp yind anylanu rrir ,JCirpnraU. sf, 0I "and Yq,s, a Ilocagovernrment may establish rn'Amii.,im and irnnunnxirrnu.uunn Unit sizes(GC Section 65852 2(c) However, like, all devebpuvient standards (e g, heightll lot covF.:ffage, Ili of size), unit sizes stwWd inot burden the developmerit of AD Us For example, stiffing a n-i'inir-nii.im un"t size that substantia1y Uncrc-,,,ases cosls or a rnaxirritirn unit size that unreasonably restricts opportunities would be incorrsistent Wth the intent f,:rf the statute. Typical irnswxiMUM unit s4es rarige frogn 800 square feet to '1,200 sqUare feet. Nknirnurn unit size must at least allow for an efficiency unit as defned in Health and Safety Codre Section 17958 1 AD law requires locall government approval if meetirig various Irpuqu.uillrasunwuuzrnts (GC %E:.'�ecfion 65852.2(a)(1)(D)), uncludlng unft siize requirements, Specifically, atlached AIDUs shall not exceed 50 percent of the exisfirig living aren-,:i 111,200 square feet and detacl-u:.1d ADL.Js shall not exceed '1,200 :square feet. A bical government may(.:.,h(:)ose a rnaxirnurn unit size Iless than 1,200 scit.mire fem t as long as the requirement is not burdenson"ne on the creatiori of ADUs. 9 E3 Pg 18 a ri P,Ei�IU � �E xo,L""I[- "I"I'l Irl I.ni,e r��I 1G @i �ai -i d Z c)I' I in g ri,, z I e!,,,, An ADU is an accessory use for the purposes of calculating allowable density under the general plan and zoning, For example, if a zoning district allows one unit per 7,500 square feet, then an ADU would not be counted as an aii:,IditiorW t.,iinit. Miriiirnurn lot sizes moust rii:::4 l;.:se doi.ibled, (e g , 15,000 square ft'.,.et) to account fair an Af.'.)U Hili her, local governments could elect to allow more than one ADU on a lot New developments can increase the total number of affordable units in their project plans by integrating ADUs. Aside from increasing the total number of affordable units, integrating ADUs also promotes housing choices within a development One such example is the Cannery project in Davis, CA. The Cannery project includes 547 residential units with up to 60 integrated ADUs. ADUs within the Cannery blend in with surrounding architecture, maintaining compatibility with neighborhoods and enhancing community character. ADUs are constructed at the same time as the primary single-family unit to ensure the affordable rental unit is available in the housing supply concurrent with the availability of market rate housing. If) E3 Pg19 lum Aie f-ees CI-Ilargied lo ,NDUs? NIIMlPrad fe,'DS, i1ndiLdnig wateir, sewer, Idnslrk and Ihraffii fees rnu,.mtbe chargeid in accordaincie Wf1h the IF::'eie Whgahoern Aci,'M-flc,'h requires ft.,,es tin bane propoirbon ail tin the actual (E." g., Sligirn:ffim.:Iiritiy ess t1vain a Mingre fairinOy t"wnne) lr`eies oin ADUs, iniusil for vnpaict oirii service".s based c)iri lil--iie !size oftll-ne AM I or riiiuirridi of pluirnbir)g RAUres Floir examp'ii700 square foot new At::)IU widh oiriiie bathroom that i in iiess iaindscq:::owng shOUild bie chairgeid MUCh less than ia 2,1000square fioot 1"romewrffi dlhnrss Il:astdnu° 011.nS and ain enfirelly niev; 4)dsicqped pairiced Which must be irrigatied Fees foif Ali should Ilns signiN.;aintly Uess aind M"iiouilcJ acCOUnt for a Iesseriirng:oairt sluch as lower slawer er traffic lirnmpacts. Ut:iht'v �j 11 2111 I , , ,,,i,, ,n t s I:, W f c), A D LJ �, ,i��ir in, C,Iiiies airid c,,im.mfies cam Of consicteir ADI)s as new n.,,,n,sdentiall uses wherii cWm,flatiiry cinininecfioin fees air�d c1pacity ditliarges Wheirie,AD,Via aii'e Ibe,ung created wffl-Uan exwUng struCtUre (phimairy oir acceesoiry),, the cifty or county caininint requiire a new or sepairate ii.jifikty cionirilectiloins 6nrth1E'.,, ADL) sand i i9 ie airiy connectioin feria: capacity , ClJrjarig e For Whieir ADUs, a Io,-M aic)eincy may reqiairesepairalp WIHAY bietween Ul"!ie dweiNing and the ADD. but el'11Y Mlir'neci:miru fee, or capacity i must beprol oa onat,E.,�to 1:[-�e iii-inpact of 'CDU IMsed tarn eidher,Uts p sze or the riiian'dbier of jp�liijmlbiinig C),ch.,�res 1, c"I l rd e Aill locali ac,.;einide�si miust chairgie hn,iimict fees inaccioirdance Mth thie IMiLigation Fee Act (cornry-iieirid,nig with Guw'..,irnirneint i ,..3ectiioinE-561000), inciuchnig irii pairticaAair Se dun 66013, whicl-i reqLrIiii-es lihe conneictJoin fees anid ic.n-apadty charges to be to fine ijwsed Iby tii--iieAil'.YU Sj,-.&c�ai gunistiricts and non-icftV and couinty sfervicer.fistrictsraust acxountfor thie Jesser irn,pacit related to an ADIL) aii shcx.j[d basie, feles on un.t,size i::v,riiwnI,',)er' of IphvrrA.nlilrn1g fiXtLR'Cs, ProvAers slli consildeir ra propi cr6ici rn ate c)r stding scaie fee struictures thataddriass, the srinaHeir s�ize and Iii-asseir impad iof ADLJs (e ig feicw's peirsqlUn^'we folot w fees jperfixturr..,), Fen::", %A44eirs orcJeferralis couildl Ibecinu �..,deireid to Ihi piroiraote'U[iie, of If; I.,k) UtHity Requiiernents Appfly toAdDLIs wifllfln EX�Sfing SI:)ace? No, wheire ADUs are beinig cireated M[Nn sun (pirfrnary w accesswy), irnew�oir separiate d6li connect'.g::wis and feces (cloininectiori airidcap�@icjty) irrmst not Ibie requ.,ihred. Di o e s il-j) 1I �j I "'Dre-d"4f Pi Of a StrrqD ar'in'j Yes,, ,pubhctuainsft" may include a busstc:q), Vaini slalioirn and piaratrarisq giaippvopnah:.,u the applicant, "lDub4c Ii auea.b+Oeretransft is @vai',"abk:'.I and can be cf,:)nsiderir,d ni:.qarciless Or fighter hnlN aidways (e,g,,, 1,5 irrOnute iis) cxali gDViNTIments=Ad cionsiO:ar ua Ii-dePnWion of pultAic transit" such as dilsWnice to a btis route E3 Pg20 No, ADU law does not aUlow pairklng to I:ie requlireid M)entl'iiere is a cair sl-iiare located witt-nin @ Work of thip ADU, A car share Ilooatilolri iilnotuade,s a deeii rvatir.-,id 1::niicup and k nd drop off linicaltilon. Loc6irini l governents Calm r71easuir ie a blioick q froirn a ppck up am::l drop f,:)ff locafioiru and cap"Q decide to adopt broader distance requirements SUch as two to'three' bloicks 1, f f S t re E1�t P,,j ir If ig Perr'i-flleciI rii Areas aa r flhroiI tglh I aridenn, Yes, ADU Ilaw d6liit.Ie rateY reiducir..,s, padIldrig requireimeirlits, Locdl rinay rn,,,..*,e s�::uecffic finiffings that tarideim paiiIlding and pairkinig inn seWacksare WeasiUe lmsed onsprierific!,r.;ite, Iregicinall topograpi,-iiica'l oir fire and life safety c.:ondid'01115 or that tandern parking or pairkiing in setbacks ii,s not jperimRted airrywhic,are r,alIse iin O'ie jlUris,:fictiorii. I liowever, ther:,.'Ie deleiriminabons SlJrjlnt,flid Ibe�apphed iin a inairiner thiat doses, riot uirinecessadly restrict the cireafloiril of ADIt ls I xx:;ad goveirnirirnents rniust provide re@soin,able accinirniminidatioirii to persions with disalbi0itiles to pirlorrilotle equal access liiniustng ainid cloirnraly with!flair housing laws ainidhDustni,9 ellerrieii it law The reasionat)lIie, aCCOM1111111nidation piroceidure nriust provide exicephion tozoninig end Iland u.tse regWations wKich lirnctudies an AIDU oirdinaince Pinteii,Aiall exiceptions are not Iliilrniited ainid rriate ince'iuideidevir'llolpmeir,it.st�aii--ii,dard!s sudliu as setbadlm ainid p:),arkiinig reqLhT'RM,ents and perirnlified Uses that ftlrther't1he I-imusiiii ii op:::oIpoirh,,inftiies of MIMICI'LiatS veidh disabilities. 'CC)1,/ II"e(,',A PiallirJ[I � I 111 CK U ll re E'11? Nol, off street pairkJrig rm,ist'be pennitted through tainidern 1::aairk�inig oin airp exisfing drivir...,way, luiniess specific findings are IITiade ""r rr,ia nr)it h,.ii e i"i R C"I 11' t Iiri ,,,td fi,::rr ai AId[,",,'AJ? Yes„ trut oirily iif tt,ie loica�l goviernmerit. req,isiren otf-strioeparkirig to be rep�lair;e.J! pin whit ha case fle,MUIe arrarigerneirits suich as Lainidr.:M, irictuidiirig existing driveways ainid uinicoveireid pairIJrig are atliowed, L.ocal gove..,rrinirriients ftave ain oppoirtiuinRy tID beflexib[e airid promote,ADUs that ane b6iiriig created�on ekisbinig pairking space arild cara coirrsMurnot. re1quilding (replacernerit pairkiiiriig Are Sefl-)aiIII s Reiqlu uhrieid When ari [E-xlis st'Hng Garage Ills CanNiefteid to aIli ADU? No, setbacks rnust not be required when a garage is converted or when extsting space(e g., game room or office) above as garage is converted Rear and side yard setbacks of no more than five feet are required when new space is added above as garagf.z,for,an ADU. lin tWs mase,, the setbacks only appIly to the added space above the gal-age, not the existirig garage and Vie,,DLJ can be constructed wholly or partly above the garage, incWirlg extending beyond the garage walls f, E3 Pg2l Al,zoc.,u, when a gairage, carlj::)iort or(,:,ovieirc:Id piairking stiructure, is, (.:nr where Hhe parkiinig airea cir,.n,ases to i-sxNst so ain AM,•.I caira be created thie re: lair.,,efnieint pa�kiing inust �be Oowed in an, "confli twah on`cm thile, lo.t incIluirfing P y 9 but 111110t hrriRied 'to, covered sparesvI, ii.incovered spaces, or tanrleirn spw::�es, or, " C.I.onfigUMNMI CEIIIII be applIped in a flexh'�Me manrier-to rwt bt,irden plluir,creation of AM Forexamlph,,,,r,, spxatbM c0rifigUr,@Uons Me tiaindu..wi on exiishrq didveways in setlbac,lIk, areas or'niot requi,ring excessrve d1stanciets froin-i UI-ile street'"Plould be ap�:.Vopriate Z Are /`%J[)�L)s PE,,rrritb,:�d h-� Yes, ADI(Jsliooatad m Mrig'e falirnAy residein6ahzoriler, and ekisting spioirF-.a ufasmge fairnifly resildeirme or acce!S.."Sory strii,xture miust be aj,:)prove�.J regair&iess of�z�oii ihn�C.] standairds (Seictilan 6:5852 2(a)(1)(B)) for AIDUs, iridliuldiinig locatOinall reqUireiineirils (Secibion 65852 2(a)(1)(A)), SlUb)PICII tO LHziUM noin-appeatRUe miinisteirWbUfldiiing. plerniR requirements For exarnplie, ADUs in existiii'Q qpai&:,,e does 1110t rieceseRate a zioning cliearaii nice and must not be Ium4ed he cleirturri zories or,areas�oir sub'lieritto he�i ht. ��ot s��P.:�e, �Ot ClOveirac unit§ize,, arbhitec;tiuiraip irjeVpeW, i 9 -1e, Widsc,q:>e oj,,, jpark�ng requxerinients SirrqAy,wheire a single Barfly res�id�...%rice or accessorystiructuire exists gin any sell nilqhefariiily resiidenfia.fl ziuriie, sa::i C@111 UIPI ADIL.) The IlcuurpcsU is ti sUearflrie airid expand potential fOrADL.Js wheaa is nn4urnal and the ex'�.-;hng foir.Alpirint�ss riot be'iinig iricreased Zon�ng reclukrerneirits, anis riot a ba!Ms for diianying a Ir �iandslka.rliap N,.aOchng jpermft for Urn AM 11 lirnicluurffolrngg nion-confo.rrniing 0 t F0 r'S t rtj C p krj ir 11 he phiram:., "wiftiri thie, evstiliriig uiiiick,ades airleas Mhirn a 1:..viniaii V Ihniarrlie or mthm an aftached or dieliacheid arcersswy struf.;tuire sluch as a garage, a ciarriage hm.ise" a plool fjokuSle, a rir;:,:air yairrJ stuldio ainid s�dimflair eniclr*.,,d strudUres Are (`.)kvr!Ier Ocaq)ants Reqt,1i:1'ed",) No, however, a IloirW gDverruneirvt u:ain requa're �,iin app4caint k:,)be Bann ir.wvner occupan't TIhe owner may res�de lion the priirni.airy m �aC ,'essoir'y!stiru.jClt'Lure pgiow..,!,rinirn�eiiVscan apse requ'iire the AIM) W n<.A be u.xsed for slhciiq terrin rent6ls (terims lesser than 30 days) BoCh owneir ocic.,,,iupanff usie and pir6Kbii,Uon cmshon ft tenrin renWs caro Iknrs required ix"i thie ;,.3,arne pro,,iieirty- L,ocap ,.igeirn&es whv(.:J-i Wnposa°,-tNs reqUirerrierit shlotAid requke recoirdzitoon ir.)f a deed restrictuoin reigardirig owner oc1(.,,iuipziiriu:cyto s:.-,orrqAy vviffi SecLori272,81 �5 rie i rie "Sr,",,,If p I �Or XIIII')9 C)epends, AE)Us shall not be re1quired R.:) provide Ere sprk,*Jers it V,,ney are nt)t gar irwe nt,A rerjuired f,:)f the primary residerice Flowever,, Sprr mklers can be reqOred ft:)r in ADU if req.,P.reld in the prirnary SAA.J(:',IUrP, For example if the prplmary res6ence his us sprinklers as 8 MUM C)f W-1 exishng o,"Onance,then spr4*Jers COUld be rr-qWrei:J in the ADU. or`lterrtative rnetholds forf'X,e proteclk::vr"u couki 1,)e proMed :1 If ffie AM is detw::Iiedfrorn the rr�ain strLICt(.R,e u niii.,11w qpw::oe abf.:)vi:.a a ide tacl,ied 14a rage,, apphcants can be emmUrzq.'W to ccmtact the pruu.asp fire jurisdk:;tion fji)ir irrform,,-&on regarOng-fire sj::vrinkers Since ADUs are a u,iniClUie oppc,wtunhty R:r acldress as vadety of housing rmeds and prowide aiffui-6able housing opfions fc:w farnOy melrnbers, sh,idents,, the elderl.,y, in N::irne health care provldersu,'the dusaWed, and Vie fire de,partmerfts war'4 to ensure Ww !safety of these f)OPUl,`)hOFvs as wn-.,,,fl as the &afeiky of those lofirq in the prk"nary strUch.,iu'-.,. Fire E.)epartmervts car"� help eM.icatie property owners earn the bierreffts of sprinklers, jpotenhaff resources n;Ind hf,:wthey can be insInUed cost, effecfively For exarnp�e, insurarme rales are typk;allly 5 to '10 r,:uercer,R byvi;mv,where the Un k issprir-Wered Rna1y, other rnethods exstto provide addftku--iaI fire pjr,:Aecfion, Some eptions rm.w inch.ide w-Aflk.)nal exits, emergency escapie and rescue openings, 'I hOLVOr greater fin,-rateid assiembhes, roofing materials and setbaioks 'from proplerty braes or other struchires. 13 E3 Pg22 !rig Per tteci as Yes, anADL) its any riesidenfiall dweflirai a.,uwnit wi&ii uindejpendi-7,-irit facHii1bes unid perrimijiriiierit sk..,.eping1l ealArivr.:1 cookJrig airnid sandafiloin An ADL.) includes an efficiernicy a.,Pnift (Flir.-.milth airnd S�afqty Colde Sechorl 17958 0 and a manufacturecl! hc.:)me (He,ailh and Safety Ciocie Sectlon 1800",7) He�,.fllh and Sal'ety Cf.::We Sectionn 180(17(a) "IlWainLifacitured Ihome,"for"the pimposes gulf"Ns Ipxt.,imeans a sfin,icture th at was constructed on or after June 15, 11976, is trainsportaiMe lrn orae f,.ar rrionm�sections„ lis eiglht body feet or r-nore in widill%, or 4() lbody feet or nriore iiia lengffi,, in thp travelikr-ug irriode, or,wherii erecfed oil shwa, its 32() or rm.)-re sqt,jaire feet., is Iwilt on as Iperrmanent ch;:Issis and designeflo The used as as sire glle- f@MHy dim.flflrig with or veiltlhm,ft a fi::nuindatiori.wheri coninectefJ tottie requiired utilities, and indludes O'le p1lumNing, heating, aiir czar-Witiordir ig, aind eiectibcal systerns contained therein. I%anufacturedThorne" incIludes any strii.ich.ii-re U--iiat rneets aH the recitrflirements of this paragraph except the size requirernenks and Wth respectto whik:,h the manUN3ck,irer vok.,iintadly filles a cerfilficafion and complies with the sti-andards establilshed u.arnder the NaHonal MantifacIured Housing Cormtruchon and Safrity Act of 1974 (42 WS.C- See. 54(11, and foIllowlng). CanEl",ff ic�eirmy �-JriO, Be &-,nakr flfla�n 220 Yes, an efficilency unit for ocirUlJNHICV by roars moirethain t,wo pieirsoiriis, Ilay statute (111ieafth and Safety Clade Seirt,cm 179513 4, rairii have a rni1iriiiin"irUrn fi,00r areaof 1510 feet and cain Nso Ihaude l)airfikal kitcliiiein or Ilasutllnrdurarn faciliihes, as slj::)eicffiied by N"1611 iancle or cairii haVE^the same nriieaininig specifeirl krii fl"iie Uniftmrin"ii BUH6ng CD dao„ refeireinced Tiro ft-iie Tftiie 24 of Uliiie, California Gode ofRegWal:Joins,, The 2015 lr,iternationM Residentiall Code adopted day(eference into the 2()16 Caiffoirnas Iffier idervtiW Code (CIF;i,C)allmms residenUM dvvelfing unks to be builif cor&"derably smaIller than an Efficiency Dwelling l W (EDIL.J). F�rior totf"ii�s code chainge an ElDU was itequiiref.:11 to Ihave a imiiiniiriru,jrn lftoor area not less than 22() sci R unless irnodffled lby local ordi:nance in accordance with the Calldornia Heallth and S;afety Cf.::Pde vW-dch cm,dd atimA�an EE"M� t�.:)bei,)t.AiIltinoless t,i„iairil5Osq. ft. Formore infarmalion,. see l ICID's Wormation If uadlletin at IE)or�s A ID L J 1-,,atlec CflJEIIs, airu�i Cctv-tes' Yes, da IDU law expfilmUly appiiies tio"Jor.;61 ageinicies”which arie dJk.,,fned as a cityl, cm.mtyl, oircity ainid couinty giervairall law or ci-a@rteired (Ser;,Ilion 65852 21(i)(2)),, 14 E3 Pg23 XDU,,,,,,< Sward Hie Regmal Rounng Need Nbcauon? '(es Ilocw govarrimentsmay report ADLI as puWms tow r IRlelgbrmll I iousOg pursuant to Gicvvprinirriieint Code Section 65400 based on he adual or anUdpNed affudabiMy gee, asked �,,.,ilulesfloiriis for JADL.Js for d�dD�borii, lI dilstcluSsPOin Must ND DrAnances BE SLArulted to the s anr:J, COD`PTl,UnIt'y,, Yet ADU ardhancic..-mi;irniust besutimniiW.,rdto Ow, State Depi,,.u4nent of HouNg and CommuNy DemWpmentwMfn 160 qdays ashler adopfionjnd=ng amenctmenh to ekslOg Whames Flowever qpn sOmMeL Me Whance rs not v.A)]ec� k) DqpaMmenl re0ew and Wngs procem AmWar M houlng leIlement Daw(GC, ,Selc6oir�6558:5) 15 E3 Pg24 Sl( Vuuuoum ,mequei�lmtly A ed Questio��I&�o Ju S I iliibr Acice sla11 IIng Un11111lls "i e e a e r e r c e I 1 4 D J a "I dl� ,J/'�"d'i S e e e r Yles', AB 241015 added GoveirinirTiient Code Slactilon 65852 22, -r lor,,Jiun�lor ADUs The W aHiows providh)g a Llniqi.ie. orAJm kcM govenrilimients to adopt or61riainices for JADIUS, Whrlch aire LF4. no rinore thain 500squaire feet and are ty�jp�ilcaHy bedmonlis irl R singlle-faririi[v hl:�rne that havie air� entirariu-.,,tirito Utile I frolim the rrra�iin hoirne arul an einh-'ance tio the oWside fro mi the "ll"lle JADU must have I fabhUesl, in6ludiing JADIU, a 9 na, A& srnk, bt.vh ir)lot required t�o have a pirivate bathrolorm CLUrrent law I iniol protiiibit hocM fron-'u aldnjY6ng an lordhance for a JADU, and UlNis IlAHxphicifly Mllovis, not reqii.rures, a Ilocar agenicy t'o I If tine rm'dinance, requves a 1,")ermft, the Ilocal agency st,41l1 riot iteqUrre nddRiloinM Ilaarkrng or Cniulesy I L..flyjj::md Hiamessaind M,mbo I W Jocel�yn 1111- ni�glhl chiarge a fele for a water or sayer coirurecboin ras a coirrd,Ifloin �of girn-.,mthriilg a pieirinW fora JAIDU Fo imorae rinformation, see be[OVII ADUs anid JAM psD 1111mmilIII III R SIz�e Yes, glr-�FllefiRIlly UP tau 1,200 Square Feet or Yes,, 5010 Square Foot Maximuiar 500% of hMni artea ............... ........................ ..................................................................................................... Yes Yes ---------- Raftirloom Yes No, Cloirnmon ,erariiWbin is A'Plowleri ............... ............... Separate Eiritrance Depends Yes Parking iDepends RairkIinq May Be EhirrIbaled mid Noll Parkinig Cainiricq Be ReqUiried I Be Reqi,iiired Under Splecifieid Corad dions Owner Dicc-luparicy Depenidsll Ovineir OCCLApaincy Ma„yIRe Yes„ Ownier Oc.,cUllanlry As Relq,Wreld FRecluired ............................................................ ................................................................................................................. ..................................................................................................................... llkrlliusfpdal Approval Proicess 'Yes Yes ........................................................................................................... ........................................................................................................................................ ProlhibftOn on Sire of ADIJ Yes Yes ..........................................................—......................... ........................................................................................................... 16 E3 Pg25 kJ t..� a !l 6 V R I i a,I I JiADUs offer the simplest and most affordable housing option. They bridge the gape between a roommate ands a tenant by offering an'intedoir connection between the unit and main living area,The doors between the two spaces can be secured from both sides, allowing them to be easily,privatized or incorporated baclr into the main living area, These units share centrall systems, require no fire separation, and have a basic kitchen, utilizing srna0i plug in apppiances, reducing development costs. This provides flex'lb'iulity and an insurance policy in homes in case addutional pncorme or housing its needed. They present no additional stress on utility services or infrastructure because they simply repuurpose spare (bedrooms that do not expand the horrnes planned occupancy, No additional address is req uiced on the property because are iintarior connection remains. By adoptunag a JADU ordinarnce, 'local) governments can offer homeowners additional options to take advantage of underutilized space and better address its hOUsing needs, l 'ii h I AE) ,,k; Cal,urdl Yes, as paint of tlhs Ihucu.uSirng ellernein'l(portion of jltnauiir geirieral Ih 4n, governments are repu.uired 'to ideirntify sites vrutlhu a�ll,pp;o�ropriate acid=rng tl,iiat wvilll aca:cornrninidate p.prrolected hinusiirng rneeds do their uegioir4l IhnIaIus411,19 iraeed nrla.acautinr�n �(Rd-dNA) aired report orn thieir p r�egir'es�s �,I:auur�s�uu�airn't to Goverr-rmerni ,ode Section 1654010 To credit a unit toward tJhie FtlHi l , FlOD and the Depiartrneir,A of IFinarmaµe(IC:) F) uRnVize the cerrsus deR niitiu::m u:nf a hot,suing iuuruit. GieneralHyll a u.0 iidl,d, irncllo.ucing Wth shared saniiltaulltcrn facul tiirr,s, that nor n,aut a tllue censors defiin'itic:an and is uepoirted to tl°ue Department of Firu ance as puanrt of the fw.)OF airnrnualll City..und Couonty II11uuSirng Knit Cl,nange Su.u,rve�y caira be creddlited to arcl the loll°IIN based on the app iro;:ariate income Ibuu'uvir.-fl ILincad goveo nirrnernts c�.nrn track,uactuaul oiir arnt.uci;pateull aff'oirdalluihty to aus!msre'tine,ADDU is cu:pIurrted to the app ir3i�.°urii" �::� � �u�r�, f"nr e��xarn lr s�ern�e Il�rn�caal ,:'uve�rnrn�e�nt�s reg west l lu IC «stu� iirr�u,r�crona°u�cata�ug b° ,,,.� ' Ip .: � �U ct. ... aund track ir°fforrnnait on such as anticipudu�ted affcrdall:)EAy aas Ipart of bu,itding Iperuouult alp,plHcatikorn. dwusdrug u..uiruiit Is a l°ucousr^,, am ail°parturnernt, a rnIrub ie hcirne coir tiraReir, a girou.up of rruruuarrs, ora slinglrz roornn that: is occuiplied, er„ if vacant, is intended for occupancy gas seIX ,Daurate Hviing cluartlers repair ate l'iving giu�karters are tlh osle lin wWlckn tlne cccu.upaints Ilive s,c�ip�IrateGy friruirn auny otiher persons iru t1hie building airnrll which have direct access frora til-ne ina,dMde of the t..ntlrii Brig nor tt'nu°cau.ugh a conirn°uorn hale Errfld ��law��,l,�p�;�oil.l� kf��l4 of II hnnary f�ln::athe JADU cannoli be iriralu,d separate frorn the p:urirmnary stnuelling, 4,,,n, JAJ,Ab s Su� vap.A �a,p i �u;.��I IIUu.,� Yliral k F;lll ii l t..a��l IIS"i�mul � a,�ui"� (`epee, JADIl.l s s,halll rmt be cora ssdered a separalA or nevvo dvuveHing u.uri t ICouror the purposes u:nf irees and �ws a.result slhoullurd run'a't be charged a faPfor pr'ovadirng nuuvateir„sewer or Rpovvia.r„ inu::ohjding as connecLon fee Fhese req uuirerrneills apply to allp:uu°a avi�rinurs of water, sewer and power, ins wr h ng niorrrna„uniclprawt puro7Jder�s, 11 ocal u;.go7,vim nrrunsunt�s may aidolpt requu'irernenils fu:ur fees iru::ull�::atewd to p�:3r u�inl , �c::4v:.ur,�nernric,e or u:arbrniruectiion fora ;uup�r;;;rry >u,u uu r or pianuhuer, howeviair,, these n:,,guirernients rroust Ibe uniform for all s'trns le farunuly res'idencuas auud ,dAD,Js are, rie"t considn„^ru:.,.of:d ua nevv or sep:n;arate u,ur iilL 'y E3 Pg26 T'h e r e Re ry, e p V i e rilt,s r F u �r"-A and F le Yle' pOcai gir..)VIE'll"ll"Ill,neint in"my 'opt requireimer-fts redlatedtiro fire and liffe pirotedloinI 1cmiever, a JAE)Il sl',nMll rmitbe coinsideiried irueM or sq:.iairate luNL bri c�thier words, if peri mart' iuiruR iIs not slUbject to fire or fife, protec:tion requViernents,, then OreJAM.) must Ibe treated fl e same E3 Pg27 lResouirces ra n �r _„ r � i l�; 1 Courtesy of Kairein Chalpple,UC Berkeley u ua 2 t�I a ['i;i nent 1 : St" Government Coldle Sectioir-il 65852.2 �(a) (1) Airiiy:6 Ilirwirad agermy may, by oircfinainice,, jp,PiroVldie fo,r �,i irreationof 1� Unlits iq ............. wa siinigie-fwn�Hy air�id rinUffifairnfly res�iidienfiall zoine!r..�. The ordinaincle ririay g,�L:g��.,do any g.UiDVtT'4iE,, f6illowing (A) Designate areas MH"iillirii the jiurisdiictloir�of the dimM agency where seGG�-'W-aczes c� ..i hie ii,�g i may IL) ..................S LIL L : peirmittecJ. rhe desigin ablon of areas may 1::)e bases inin criiteNa, 'V'-iiat rn�ay ikricliacle, IbUt W,B iriicA Ikirnited to, 'U"n adequacy of va.-Aer Hirnd seweirsc.,,�irviices airid the lmp-�,ict of s,&r'qR4-I'jICVN5si , V �� Ull'Ifts cn) Uraffic ffi i and .....................................FIC ............•....................... ,1. (B) to firnpose standards c0l S4QG9FI6 i�CC,e-3sio JVve;IW)g'uln&s U'llat inclir.,iide, but are inicA Wimitield lo, j3ajrLd<ljr"�r_ R'Jln —.1ul—(............................... sietlbac,k, Ilind coveirage, arpcd airchiftecturM rE.�rvdewi maxiiinniuni size i LHIR. arid: %tarndairds that jmreve,nt,aclve.,r5e ...'...............................21 . iimpacLs ruin airvy real propeirty thiat is Hsteld iron fl-�ie Cafifoirmia FReigiiMeir of 11-fistoii'iic Races ;�? ag '.fLjj W a 0 1rnu .......... ..........11............... LDLL tL,)j, u.'ann",L'I—nay—redurr,or oite.'L IDC,,'.11o:^d IWAUINI f as n—stand Ans—( (C) ProvideuinNs dio rm� ex � iceleld the 0owable dem-lisgyy foir the I'Dt Ud::�iinii which .............-...p .. ...........q the1��iLg i is loca�eid, and that ,'ess.a, Mn................ 0 :.q units 'are�a resiiciliential use that ............................................. is cionsisteril:with thie, exit hiril gpii'iierWp�lairii and zoinir), i naboiri for Hhe lot ,9 9 i accieswsoirV gwits.fio ciii rj.'. 52L g:, ...................................................................................... ............ 77iie unift if,not hiiitc�,ncled for s aft' p..irgale From the L'.� L� a' da:............ .......................11............................................................t................... it ,.1.9,46 m o m I a xi I rg� Single-fa r.LIQ21L L ...q�,ffa • ELW.. EI ......... 2 ....2 =2�.L ............. .................. r 1'11.q �r ELI u ya;��d3 efthei alitaiched tic) divvelm2a tl i i� I .... .... .... i I I....................... ................................................................. ....................................................... e..�.a owl 1..1.22 is dve Traw ............. [.I................................ d locipled on the sii lot as the ig isl MjjkLq —.-................................................. ................................................................".1111-1........11.............................................................................................Una (.a'v rle,f,ricreiasir.,,irltloorafe,aol(I"- "tj fit twc J'r� i sur.I.......................................................................... ............ _I�Itnr r,L iexc,eed 50..j,')cVce afthip i ..................................................................................... wZ!112 a maxiamyn irtcrr,,,,,ase in flaor,ei,rea of 1,.,2,00 s yareheet .................................................................................................................. ...........................................................................U...................................................... fiord du� total i Of flc;uIan �&F i acicesscwy I., ymt shall nol exr.&. ed.I2QQ s uiare feef ......................................................... ........................................... .............................................................. q .... ....................................................... Z i ;N In C, canstruction of an acc,6,s...�Si' /ling I ..g .......... .......... ..........I............................................................................................................................... . .........9 E L2 i.� M V'W;�g!f w ii Me ofy dwe (.Ei Nosietback sil.a b r e i fire d ror rasa i is UfM.,U,.�Lr g p..............[I..!.............................................................. _f, iscorriverted too acice. sso. LILveMar irmiL andgi .... .......................................................................................... )ifna i than five,reef fromthe ii de and tear lot lj�jr W1 be jrr�.g '..ytLj3 s p r k i.:........................................ s—s an a aces f III I tunif .................................................................•........C., K..........12•......... Ll............................• 1,1 al is,consitmicite I b v a �L........••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••. ...... .......•p......... ...... V 12!q..Uirefn f.ls,I i it a t to detrlichigirl.ch efling, g�1 .1 ia ................. .. ........... cl.,if reg!V,weiJ ofter wviier 'w re(I ..................................................................................... ............ ..........J.................... ........................ - 2LP IISIts for accesoir rh,veffir its slfaf(rtgt 21XCIERI 01E La LA� air"ppg[ tZif o112Eaj • .. bie,idroiam, These '0 1 as liavrdpirn k r go gxif�tirm. iva� ........................................................................................ _q ....................................................................................................... ............. .........-f ................. irted i Selbigick areas in liocations deterryllsrJeld..b.y a .y o ir�LlLnu c h ............. ............I.•....................................... ....... .aqe _........ gj� r i ,'� f m setbigick preips g f a f &., [0 ( not feavible ... ......................................................-11.111�................................I......................... �2. . ... . .......... ...........•........................................................ Baru r.cd w.u:,norrs Eaca rik o'.1m.k2. 1,)h�icalor if�ireand�hfesafqft,�rond�Jfinns', mr Lm.:Y....st......r not 2. Y. 2 c.P�gtao in I ................... ... .................. U Z"his,I • • L rlause Sallht.ol a ,sbedin suibidwitsion ia t,mft that is decri 20 E3 Pg29 �l ' utw pnu S"U...... faL au.p 7 alm.l I rUuup,tuc)hshed tua rauyunctUcaua youth the ru�auu trucli oua �,� auug..... .. km_uaL Ey q.iL mat LmaE cuE Im�LI'mLAILP.17.m1.2�2n"° rL A .... aU r uanau p�r�c a r uuu � ,u�� uu a uuu �a�a� ....,r��n P��uu�...s �umn 10 �° �M:',;r...a((upon o u��u��aa�� u�u��r� utuu�¢EL sl,_ but gduuur�tar prur � ra ca r s am c au�u�u v�auu a na�ra ° �rsr auna ruau o upas. duy Ure use o up,echaun�e:an apt raagn to Uc� tuaugutup�:g..:�OtE m s ctaau�, shall not�-a�a �p�bra�n aauaot p uPn�...:��utrA`#r:::gat�s'rp iva....,suufi�u�uva uu�uu ( curlcUiiruaanca shall; not be cloinsiidarlad 'pru the app'k::zUoirii f arny pcca�V�ann°cg��i�ir°a�araca.. picll'pq �cnr Ilsircklrairn to hiraniit ra^siderntpall gircvwuth (3)'Wn rn a Ilaaraap agency receives Itsfirst apopOicatwrarn ora or attau Jitfly t„ 21003, fora permit Ipiuur„au.ua'A to this rau.ulkniiivr3s on tllne appkcap$cur slralP be couasprgaure rnnpruisteir:6iaplly iitbncwuat,du�s�cu ka.cuu'n�air'y riaMe cr��z:A Iheairliung„ noWthstaincfing t,ectorauu 659101 cu°65,9016 ar ary'klcrap car uirnanca irar,pua afin tll ire Uu slarncia aNairminices or sp ieci�ag cusp may4as const ued +equ:a ra ra Hassall g u•auaanaanurau°igu-xadsapk�r-amem.,g-asn- or R aaw',a•ga.,)r g :a:9uaagpas :a 'i pa uuar,P;, urfrighin 1 1 slues au pp r°acnMuv un g pma...aa�a gica6 aao A lois a11 agency may Aarrpa Asa tea tO PCHff'puaurse lilt fa.aur costs plluaat lick Uuncluirs as a rasuuft of airmcrldrnnsnk^,:a to this p°aaira ralplh eirmactield diuring the 200 g ,aptIf egiiflair!Se oin ofthe Laagualluakvurti, onirk a,fiirug the craMz-'a of adlapppunirp or nirriein6ng airry cir6 nairca that prowides to the creapicaun rofDUB%-u::auu acsc.,swo u��...r,�pu,n��,�/1�:g. ....a,p,a,anel .............................................. h, �n( ) dap When xnsfin, - �r� 2 zrr„fl.Q.u ruuu��1c a r �rr*QnUd�ra a of...run ear. aa,asa �uv�raggUa'o ....nu� U`U p.;0 a p cap agency wMich Unary-no:�acppplaa.,g lnn rurrgUuuarnce govuarruianig,,ADL.J a Uu"n accnar arnc*vwrU'kll n su t:aiip,s fxa t...aap-a, pwaa4Gna ,,ern°or after dapY : ....,�� ,„..� na�S rn°waµg gavarar:a•ars�ga h as aavUn �sxua pNn�•d�ss�aaparn a0�u p �aysg was a npapsvucation..anid approve oruse Ih:a�raa� plPna��a ps'hp�r:a ngucrr!u�n'tlu�nd��p�nu�w,a81h� wGuk�nauag uaralNNua�°au��review:pat,rrs,n.ur:anng lc p;p�nli�a.... ; ull:AmsUam-uunUc�an,4 or gin a�pcauawss Of rg�rrp,��hu,rp coir-chn nce. a�a¢pnop��u��ary� a gp�c ag ru��ru� �wsru�p•;rarpeur rug afUacUpu�� ••. . clalu`...o the ct arra” tpan .., oauarpuZU, !. 6nairs g......)I p �ar l p2cp�„....:k"gn�ad U�uau�;cu:�� pw�p�wuaaraaspenagm a�auapsUuans...fo pgua h u u,-1,�rof a cu K>,�roix�,lanv��apaUl.nuuaut�auutg ��arapg nnra�k uuur gnu�cle soar a t�mp�t�pn a,��u�cap rc,�aaa v lar�gyu�a�a�raau�an� w„ ,M La rpira�rr.m'ar'b"Bls aacu'ggapY�'�„nannnprs �axcir:„�ak r"9 w iraf)gf��9d"o°"�ip��bV Q BC��k�Vida thins�anngS�gtlk�b`»�ion. it)the e ��'b�i"But that a igicaa�uai E°d"6c'Z .. .. d k . ... .. uu Uat�un� :per¢ yap a a u�r onn� carau�„crrga�ra�....... �tg.n gip..�atg..uk� rauu��a�r:�u rur��r u�na�r^^-unga rat tU�aa� srutuc�guv„��tcun„ �tg�n�U u�r��ra rbc slm”Wdue mill...a 7 g v i nu�rau,p....the effective clap e o gonna enc p up,pga��unap g�p,P�pp�pua�cpa n��aa�u�ucg Ugaaag..,, uta un�b;...:s�p�n�g�ga�ua��aftor... .. ... p,a u U can unlairds established�0 aphis v¢ubrhiviGRio,n for fl!! a ��a�o�r ��r��a�� c�� rru��u��,�gua�s�ruu�uu�p�i,::,.uuua�Ua�Rr�I:...uuua�rU�ruua�g�g gg�wrw ..... .....m m .. adcpnp,„au n coir u�r a nce UIrn....aaac:nr a ca v�unk' .sapa p U ' ...a �c„ ' . � � � tern oma n��tl�tun ",� �rganya-a#'tn rr'- pVaa ..:ph,a._ rapap hc��tdo n Uw otwdwupt'Rnst�aundm Saac'tpaarn. 1-car to- ' U a a wur,,n -Brau aU a aauna gna911 p,guau t-u,a vuauuannrasn. s,pnasu p n.usaa perran44GFth cr ap'Uunun• aU.. .. v gaU U 'gn Fa” a;a a,a rsapa6u ;a Up a n9k sap aa_usUgnaa niµn pgn, k ccraa p r „s With g this au.: Baron . n).41uun ffIfg i44l g...ur'itended tor•.„nallc:N and-may-l'O'*reAte r �p-g),.Pw peat-is-se nnas Awn. tru pP aunnkV'y vin im,.AUtga Hy-use.° Gly p v"r-&lot d wa[4w (D T4;e AD raplluuroAr s tkaaa..aanu ntanmrp v�^��IIU aa.... aNataaUua v,U a as a tpn,a... wv tnrnp., pw a UlhUnnp as ri WG'at d-aaan l a auiraa'paa#se n tis n auwstl�a ,,,gv ag ua . �.. pnc prnarada�as :t, Ueurar rcnraa aa�ra aattaaagn as t t:.0 sllnapp nnca't nu cuaaavp pa ar not..rat-tgu a pstnan ,Ilwvuiiva area, p Pea teuta� ra•raeu��U�a rasps�u u��enr�n s.t aUn�a�- �� s sntR-an t�a�cwawvU g �g�U�s vaaar�*� oat �-��,y,panaaprrraatna.•,n..atsru �- a^Uuku �'toe,& .ta.�t- �a ,r„n �^„�n �a°u�d��ui„tva�r�at..nn��w�t °o_�tt -�bx;��aau raavr„wsu � „.... ratio... pao •aan uaUUtaputuar,at taaaa,µ:rpeUa rrasUuu:ucwtUsaaa„trn p'Inauvv Ps nra ria Btu puurpar'yo i.a..... ap up.,..-tTanU:aa:aors'an.....rs un�n�aaunas pancs � targataa a eUvwuatptrn ac spa)naparpaataaw. -�Appraruu�'t °thy Ua �µ U.: a a i... a:ncr.,w kauara a psa � �a' �a:a u s a uau �a4 s.puaa� ..pu un�n� wsa ak„....ii uapr.a .•,. 21 3 Pg30 Q ; . rahll'aar'Ilocai Jordi narn s: IlacuNJry, cur re guuliaflo n e�hnaH II„oa the IN.uaslis fcun'the cad a 4nuuiillcdiirn pean'ir'mrh cur a USE, perniaiih uivardePr dhaiiv. stub 'unrii.a Nrau"u & �d',N!,a suohacdiVlsucairn esdahaBosll"naen dll e a"nnaxur'r Uir n Mahn lands t'hnat Nsnc;ai a,rganna.',.iie s slNnallll uuse.INra evallivahea P e.4- "!i,',N.in..oa"n-NRA',rN...r"lJdm:::7 dr�d,iCd,;, v:u,:�^d...:d ^ ddMn" unPid lar6 "r,.ebu� ,i u'�u�kN UII"Ir' rliIX� rnlirc?kp �uF 44pN NC�� ,°, I NPR dBa idiC.aD Y�Y u'n auosd'uung siionnalbe-dam lly dvveUlk-ig No addik orir nll sNYInldards, anther,than thin".e �ronrua�ed inthiis&ubO N Ii�un�� ,,,,;��ubdi jj:'�nu:.� d. .alNnsadll II„oa uNd411uzeld or irnnpose'a:d, auxasupit that a Ilcuaall agairna:.y na'nay require ai n a,halfalluraarnt d'cnr a pei rniiN. ssn.usndIpunrr;lUA,uo"nh,dra this sn,ull:acdiinuiisiiaro to dna au"n �rn.a^.ir:,.a ,:.;. :: nn.�., gerrner qg2jm Lii,it th ad theygN:»r� d:n N.a ,ni fo.. .. ro:�.:rita.�.l°r....N::al._�,�;N;r�,�.:....I ua:N.�!r":d...I.�.N.:�.:��....::"�: ...��,a L�lj .w:nnIBR . ...,snIk *�r : h h n da�' d N aaa a naiia�n::nmm 4wy 6.N n;ad algairn(.:ry iru"nay amend its zoir nnng o�rddrnairaa�aa or geau"neraN plain to Nu'naairairp orate hJl'iile d'r.:odiinnNr sl, If;oirr celdnares, rur a ill')eir p:arr'anadsi on'ns auj:uq:o'filcahada to h'Nnsn c rea'6oirii cuf AIDUs a,ra ar clg,,!;Nag'ca,a,dr ddaysndddragn�rpd�if alNneasea farovisNa':uu'nus u!alre ca'au'aslistleirnh wiflln the Iluua RaDorns of hIN~nNs sn.ud:ua;diina4 s0ir.11 (5 yn d DIIJ- N-nndIN'n. orafer nns gra.ddnwa.,uerdaa4irsomeri'N,...af An ,.ic,ressi. ndvelaYarunlit thq Qf [nLS drIIIIIS subIVIsioin. sd"nadli be c4r n,nYaaard drabel carp rar'°r';rzs 'rar P.a 'a rar`rNua rnRra,u raa dur,,radrddrpcd arard Ddu a rnruh Nur a aairnsnauaacd hco rar r e rdp"na aNllcowalNalla deiripµaiidy for the iIii u.uli:aarn which it is Ncna"uad ard„ and PshaaRll be rde er nacd tin be a re rideii'adi4l uusani that is aamarnskn:nteind nahr'i'Vii than exis,durnay rduauac>ral pial n Ar'ad zuan.'uiing desk ria!6onsfoir dllneu Fli,aa A��Pl� s—caccie a�r�n�rYan��dddar N.anra� shaualVll not be r'orirsliidered No"n the ;,a N°allilcahooirn of ain�y dla�sallcurd nimniaa�, ladkicy, �ru�r d:,)rogirairn to NN.rrnit rrasidem'°n�dliaall gruii ....) NG;p °,a;0(.._;P,9a'aaaali al envy Qa.p:.nalka surysN.... a:n.... .hR& iswe....:voh:lii.h.lglaN.NypfesW ei ��0wdsa,.:w�a�:RnwRn.,.,hhryr N�-� u�nhµyu r", rrnL 46'a P4Lwne d aam"3E,nnunhsus.s dhna °:urrd4unnasR s aana frn#hnn s n N,n rn�dN 'nsR Nnat.... r nwu ur . r._.NNrrrnha:..... dw:dy„ ann nn h n h n h n� annhr4 a �nll:h n rn°n '4h N r u :s• 4 Ilnnrn&0.f f unnahy.,arn mulfifarwy to nee a aS jnnshhb�.,,. asd allah4anad dna..nrrdnsn a'°n,su ddu ud aaans rR ad,,, rYsn do aau nrdurasrna r,",,,,,, ranr uadrw"a r. r:;s"sra r ,a a ddddn, „naunu��^ rai,,,�"ac(.:vr� inn. N arida,,,,, SE,.!.dnl.jS,i.or' I�rd.....rd?a annN ,� ads WN ni ud.udUJn'Y.adn anu C.'m Yah''"kYrter„durdy ;l i; id91531.,id�aru"n �Jw niYaaad dCa glraadC:rcarl a-airr.,e ir"Op a!kudP ddaY'N d.... d .. unaup'd parr sanarNd dR::n dduN°s,snPdadd ,raNnu ddu �rnC^sud nnu ^ duddr. ad adpsn v,.dda:aaddsurn an'n d ro✓s^sav'sd;ar ,. r"c:a' sds ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,m,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,a,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,d,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,m,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, adydadrs ;tion a audaadbdaardauddy rrrddda mrd ndnMnt.raaddanan ap ..r nrdNxiG rsuYaanif tua_sP.ulnrdawisro�a arrdddadra d h rdan as as d n° *r wnrduan, dins A Ilcuc,ai i may esllaldalliisll'n irrniiu"niiunnuurn and rnaa Nn>rnn.onrn uurniit r'aiiasu raiquuiirenrrnarnds fear II.-m N'i attar'hl:d and detached , „curers dddaa;rp units. No nanNrnurrnuunan am u'anaarriirnnn.urn°u shsurnu s n a;dn gar ssraa' d?tau P,arnii!k; or size 'basard lulpon a perceiriitagle ofthe eu lisitlirng ciBii shaaNll d„oc esta'6allii,,,hena„d by(.::w d°uruarmasn d'rair saii'Rh er en'ktaahuR„nrd Nair detached d rdoauelllliirn!r;,ds whadada rt�;@„�,at Y�Raeas u'naa't Iperrrniid at daast aini a f'Ifiicif. naay Unit dra has: Yocuu'nsdu°uPc;'NeAcd in raornpRarncie wiNha Naacai :n s;sdaudd rprad rias r' r rndraa rico arrnd`d:dsdPs ,s aPdradd r;s dd`ddur"w rarra u:Pad rda,n lluul onnr'nn"o'd sau°nrd as"rds. a,'aru ...,✓tdauaa,;,dd4PNra ranpd ,. ......_ __._._........rR.... ......._......__. ...�_...._. _ . LCliuri—Jr mrd f-0—rt che 2 0nua11-rrie rd d� unnd d dPa�ddNe'.r run'uaa:ud Paas a"ardo is:d earn m.fi d NS a Yair ra'ac' nr'iP Ck, pa'r"' � ra iirPi an aY' aRY '� gl a rid nfi aiYa 'a R"Con Via:BnJBYd d.;. t' Y:daw,atl ddddaa', a,kYadd.a in accordance Nrh�nddP�"radb dda nxiior �pas ,ud9add aR�aid drnA a�p;ia a ar�dr9a' ,ad 9i7 dear dro for ana Na'..ori Ya rdnV,aaI.EiI... Hart dna a"aray d'ddasP d'raddaauPrdrM drasdauarLs; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,il,,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,., ,,..........,,, d' 212 -.mr"2.r..Yt;dNnaaddduu u.dradd r`s du:;ur'mirR:and aa,ndddadr'N rarNaa duadd'raudPen rod:aN..udaddr;^drarasdd. p"dyuu„ar ss,;nrar rdnPy ddanu"rI uradd ds rico tiled'�Y^ithina an a�nru.dNft c uraU �aau l.isu��ndr^aa Vysaa�uajyd`a2rpa yaa'sdrrrdc ranr'r'r;^d. „d"'dna a r au aniCar IV�e'ddn"fin irn� Vit d Rn'ld irad ddN a e k�i.t..nU .V"dalfl.."✓ nd d ar'pP ? r u"an'n exrs r"8'7iC c'a�:"C"S�ro(:b'' wdk"iY.ctur`". ,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,- �„d ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,d,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,N,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,d�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, N dd9aaru tura.sdrs e d .asurd daaam .aeAr:rradds ren.,uudrard d;uuah unYrad rads recd dYa ddaaa q., s. .a�rad end dd'N a an:;cassrar n un'add4n'P arra d. d............................. d. ....................._..... . „", ,,,,mm,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,”,m,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, N duaarn dduepr'e is sa car share u�adPdadra/or.:'P.:ale d h,r�ddnuudru one dadsua�rud`the arn�'ass'cn r adunaadddr'aC a.rrudd. ..................................................................................................................................................�.......................... ......................................................,.mm".,,,",,,",,,,"...................................",,,",,,,�. . „",,, .....,.................,,,,,, ..d,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, (eu) tae-r-wn,y:d,,,,ru d r d:a a raa an' . 4 NeuR a4arlkiva - may...be;equired-provided...� ad d4n::nua4 �s�F rP^Pa�d�.:hll:a d�Pna a�d�dhdliaunaa'd p��r�4u°a��r� uuNra unn�na��an dwr �d�P rsd�n�ra d� �h::na... 22 E3 Pg31 u s&, f dfk�_P'GN,r arid apphoabfa u a4N �uua�N �,.,,uwa re gumuruwnau....NnuA o....N N� t;�.. "InGf nePuuam„ufdu, Re.. r,rauu: d �.�N �k� u� lhaa...�ar n, 4froxuN o;n,tnrrfr�st�dff maur s�ft afd`, r;;n�r m� ..:fa �(�rd.�d�a,ficfmmmdv ,,,,, f�ra�c aum um�r�. afaaaf d faruraadu�m�, rrf rm? pmaur xi Cama ,,, y ........ ta:a�d p, Fit r.f...: tf ffrm. uamarr fru ` auP a hrudffad a� ,G,fua � -fGmramofr ^;Kkrmfr:aumtaeaar aara � r7 >"' ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,w.__..._.._.._...................................................... .. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,..,,,......_.......__.............................._....._.............,.,. n , ...,b_....y,n .... ,......,N,N,t_ sit A0 /ffNmmd �of #f� auyLa ms canlaiged wrmfdmaua the e�m faa n, dr�u�pmay�"aaff ��N�.y��mmmfr�r�nsi��aara�r a� mma �a,u s1n)�a ddd�,��:� Lg,ro amafMP.u.del d m xtio�"GiC9V"r�Ri��'d"�"' rc�from��'e,..„�''xistl ag �.d�� SP4�iG��iC��;��r�� Gw`�P�,�kead a��W�W Pl�fU� ��WiC . .. ....... ._ __ ...... a dr .m mmarfr r p ff ra ,,,,¢urmars hamafd arraf_bir, arvuyrrm,t��u^Icj to.. rrmedref ��r ��ua�fafu�f m�d`�f�m �r ummaf�u�,ufdurma a�....�rar'rfae..... m�m�fuar �r�mf �r�age fl,) If r,,es charged for fll°iiie clonstruudiun Of eGGnaccr..,S... 0� „ ' .._ rmiiiri,1d tai acroiridrm� � � S � � wth (,'haat r 5 (carrrmcm vVittS'ectulr66f00), Section 66012),, ram if"flam��'�fm a mm a S Gwfmamff rra"uf fame co,uaiider'ed nous r aadafm datac'al iR,m a�'�u �a fra�'faCm daammwm„r mPf a ti9fa aaf�af PVdiC�f Ir K�O .....n_ n n._ .. ....... ...... .,,..._. ...... ..... e"a��a?",a tl"rCbd dMi�"p C as .� `"„a a x a°�ir t Iati aY',, iCaLac°a„ aNVR”�iYmN_#,',7uK,Vi� E mm-oice LA „ faryarr w�ahr a raaas�us f�ufaamff� �rr raraaud aimurdaafmum� u` ua f�mgd rmmuaaf�uafu�rrduaftgara� irk �� fur�rup.,�d r°a a ur muu wu rater afr at,rr"" enu a fmra uPr ui,amu r�'e P a� a u*qua re r„a ^, a tae u. aas auuar.... aar r as urur �rr u��mk rN u..... ffauf,ly�a�cfaa��adr�a'frruru...fe a Crur ",,, �a�a �...:.. d a Para u: ss r icriaa"ruafd fmrd eausp:�...ddamfd flout�dma.�pMubed as sir.afu ay frame u'.a ua fru d rra°".9u aau a Bryn a rrau a ar�alaa�ry r, a �aaivau erar�,r�rrd,rprrup,., r'�a'cr �u^raa�, �Quaraa� ps; ^m aau o u�au+r�� a ,arura ;mus ra�e,,,ar��r�aPp� aara�dn r� aa�rerra �wrruu of fid ,, Mara rMua.... P��uuf�amKm�,Tama ua�ay'a�m t qua�a�uaraauuxip�rmmmu rfa rm��Yafy�ma rd��,p�a� �m��rrtsr_��aar��a .ajLop2gruaaa�°to r t��a;...... huufu erf uro�`wP�df^�ry�mauadur;u,,a�r��Grua �ro�,,,,��an�c^�du�� pururr �;a�nara��.r P. �rrora iftheu fis Giza rau the amar�u ber o r s rn�eaaaa��'�arp fffmfaff Pia f ..uyad,�u�fmaau.sf ndu a s emam. hi'S.�f�r'...or chaaMi �i mfl mmmmf a, r1mtduu�mrpase�ay able,...cost 0,Q� �ayap��uaer:..!raasm senare (fid) PI6s sect umm does anted kmmiLt the au..AhoirRy or Nuucamll mu nmrun:ies to a dcmpmud less rmm tiricduurua reqiuihriemients fuwlr the crealhoe°ro ofaN::"9t,daa, m tiara,c ssoi.�,,&,..,'��L�n'.rL,d�,p.d �9 t,ocN ageiriiii sNudH sauu!brnd, a clop;,uy of Che rrdiinrmra1s mo'r'c1r� r.ra ra� «"aadopteic�.t puulrsu.aaurf'dicy.am"ulbadm sIliuroru (a) ar�(G)4cii t��ne! IDiepu,u,ul�meriil f�IHOLA�SNlrmifp �a��nid nom muuunity t eveil fauumr�nd w ifl,fun 160 days of eir aidopbon �(r) As i In tpiOs sectfcarm„ ddmrm fit flowing t mrms i: ILivini ,�n Irmn :�mulem rpu ,'int rior IhaaubRabile area�of a c1m...:'Iti rig u,ulnft rlrq�Ille,u�G�ihirii I1::a�rm�� a�merts�and�affic N but�d�m:ws r Ot nrmclluurde a gairage m"any aiccelyi sair'y s!Nrluect9.RrG , (2) ,.Ill..ocll a mmicay` rmmelru�s cityo county cm- cli"dy airii1d c>mmuurmty,, w'Orreudlher f w ur ch alrt Ired, (Nd) p:::,aar pXfli of flluiiau .Nectiiruum .Irma Na�'fmlk:uCamfm�araud" has tlh earv� ama me moa ng as set foifth in Section 65589 5" (4) :. o n.u9.,,'..A.L urs r ruuy mdlp✓g../LIgg uarmlit uakauaria, are attachierd or ia detached riasid ua..afNdll udweilNNrm uunipt umafuNcllm prio.viiudK s civammmpjp[etua dru m", erurd umt kviriq fa6fifies fur a ni e oir ii Ienrsoir . Ilf sh,ahN iill'I'C uuad Ip rmainerad fare visJorus for Wing, s h,t,,p,A n , ea lung, c scall ;n , and s uuuda,ftiorii urolru thiesarne jparc ll as Uhe siInmfp[ -f anR'y dweiI8 n,g qc.i sftuuaN.ead Aamcrdff� aua.0 „dr d p ,,,ptlu d ffQ.Uu'mfd WSO iIPICIuuudes dlhiva foIHowr ngp (A) Aum efficieincy uoMi ama deftnield iru Secfr um 17958."d of D~p�,,Vth aii Safety Code. l,,,mme, as d fummeuil Nun Seualtioim 18,0107 of the HeaiirNru airrid Safewfdr Colde, m '�fwpm uv ."fay a ,� f a d ur�ry fad N„m ua aruggluktaq u°k mrJUL) w,;r �r r ua�nf fr ram aafu f f �rra mufm ma :a m w#2,!".._cssff,�,, U, d E3 P32 Nothiiing mra this sih;•ect�Hiar" shallII be coirrrsftrh•.as:ed or hurl any way alter or lessen the effect iroiriiaII::Thcaflio�ur of tt'iiie Caahf r'r'apa,:a Cic: ,aTAaall Act ([::iviisalir„'gra Wth Section 100iD10) crt N'.II°'ah::. F:IW:::,4c ResOlUui o )„ i thua't dlk°he,N i glovernment;r':NtaaIIII Cared. Lie reiqWired to I["icflid p:ccr'bIlu dPeaii'inigs trar a;acaaadaa'9 de,aar [cap"raeu°at II::ri as,ppllac 'kdurrs d r'dPdnr#tda sped"r# dra rd urdd n 5852 a� I aa�i encV r�aa�� .� rarrddrt,drrar„ra” ,dtrra�rdrdexi i the r aaddr�aa�af amm 2. 2E cdda#d.f. arna L dra Sa�dr.## t a dtddM rrxiaxiddprrtacad ;R"u sThe rear°#draParpr rp rra�ay rmme c��rdrep a t�, rrrpdd t ., �xi rr#��dra c�m#��dµ -.1-. ,,,. thie,croatic'r_ �••r mrdrar•••Par r e N^e r r#a9r �#err#rr##fid r ardpl d# d Rr,,, d#r r#d pdlcaY"f,,n#pard,,;;, # drr# tdar ra#a#rpdre r r, ; rurrsrar,aa #�,g r#uh#r �r##c r"r ad is#a Rara�a p r „gid" ' rahal drpd zou:a d dor �drr � drwarr��d�r�^,��dr#�„rrces . ardtda Ra« ruQn t , d�trrd #aR a ,,. rn p:Pr r"rw g wQ rra0Ira ddrSvfjg L11dy nie"d# ��ic"h the d��dd# nit h t a � # .... i'& Cd. #da aaprraGxir rrarc"�aar P'r:"�"�idedO dra either"ddacy riC°;aIi drarra�t trrar'I�rrara rad ddraxi FutrPri�th,rar"i t tdaexi r�iC°'fnR d R rk c��ir�d��arJ�iCYr,,,, �... � -- _ .... .. ... . . _ M. , r ia.«ar �r.#r� rd�a a �#rsr� add'aa;d." �iaP�rra rrr aad a:ru da dd r�arad,�da r2 e,ddrerdmdfMe cmartnqd«i rd�cuddda r � "�u r"r'rrr'u!raa'aif 1� �r#r'a�r'�: d ,da�.r-#.... trust, r,�aedarmmsd�d �rrard�ard r ddcar;v ; r;e#hrnrr tdse;••rep• rarr;haVd`rarr erg••a adhA#xir•"rrPd#dura ae#Rardr bdraadd Cerra 4dPa theland and sdaadd demiddc:r aaradda �re' darrdr�dra .. n „•_,,, artr rer�`::. air s# li add incl i de d�rr��d of td�rTM,"fraddrara drab•,;; :rrradprta#tdcrrp iiia the.aig0ia a�#d#aas 'hr!Wor aar„c esps ar rPra dddrae'. r.rrrdt area°eat' trrh La!th sale I the«r�"#rre,ds-#aaruadd ........................d._................._...........__............._......_...._...._...._......................... .......... . P ..�............,,.•,•„•......................,,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,,.,,.,,,,,.�,,,,,,,,...,,,,,•,,...,,,•,,,.�.,•......,.,•...................................._........�............._._.......__.....................�........................P............................._.......�... riC s(rieraira dra.'dh.rrding a°a.,"sdra.dR:raa rad th ad tda rdeir restriction,r87aa�r t9R?e d"d��ar�r r�...aa.yaadan�d.....drddrarr� rah tion�o�aa�t he .kdzra nd"d��d�drd�t�,irda��ref�d'�a��Prra��r a eresso _ u"Ir d##rr ...drrrr"�d d#rr#��••r�r'sr"r#hr�u rare iu�ud�:�....d#rd s �e��ddara. rd die^rrrrrea as asrr'paddterrd hrrrdrar...ac�exi�s:rar g cdaro a:.a#tires: edradt daa Lg'n �;ionsdrru cte d a"!vdtdadrr ddarr e�xistora raraadd,.�'Ithe wdrarrcdrrrcz, .. . ,,, ..d.•, „..•,•,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,„,,,•,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•.•, ,,,,,,,,,,.................,,,,,,,,........................................ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,d,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,,•.,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,. ,� _... ................._._........................................................................................................rd.................................................._.._.. . raid r:R ed,d,d;, ,,,,t.1.2.�°,,,,,nd..21L,d.sword c., d ...... r d "e'iY,rdp ?i rrraddt Cd rrrpre raaiG""R»iR;"«a dPoi" P#ddJ6r iC$rraiR:dhd d� k u sari df entr'rc:arEce from ddRr� ra'gin e'•ntiv�nce to the strer drrte with an .. "gur�daLraR ' jg. �r ,� rodrr eceb Id . r,drde,r'a Frardr� ... c ,• .... dt aa”",Chir lo icor iva #far"urD rraiCd raterRiP I.g.,ti..0 rr. L6a r rrdra ...... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,............................................................... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.......... ,,,•.,,,..,,•.,,•,•.,,,,•.,,.,,,.._............._�. .__..._.........._.......................................d................................................................................................................ . ,d#u�xi d�rrdd��af�r#reed;,;;• �-.iiL r rPrdtde as rrraaxVraer.rrrr rind•V•: ..dfd�ae",chaineter.. f...:d...��...,�,n iche�:... #d rV r"aeadadta"rduaddudt nd`tdamd�t,rdRartrdaaat ode#...:cheat rrprdrir e tr• „trrr Bpd s•tra d'rMh. ru 1.20 aandd«s.,ria naturalrr,.. r;" traraed ,yea r dr`iCPra r twarrate^rmer"r cd tear°aa aM°adadrar::;^ts th at aara'.0 ofrea��r�nable iz dra relation dry Pdura sd� r�ifd#aa rrradrar° ......................................................d...............................................................................................................................................................rd........................................................... . . •„•,•„ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,...,, ........................................................,d................................... !a,dn c;"a, ..a" cdda d' rac# h.rrrdd. da # rNrr rarcdd"rrahrar:;r::a oda add raert r"a' h.rdae rh:#h##dd"crraaad ,aar#draR" a rprardddd�rorr t r. rarut r::a ,;arreedt. ..........................................................................................................................................._..........._..... ....._......._....m......�.....�„_.. ...�d�,•,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,",�,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,..........,,,,,,,,,,,,,......,,,,..d,.,,,,.......,.,,,•.,,,,•d.,,............._..... #r#,•«pertardd d.a'd`rarad•a##rarad•; rrmdradraraadh ¢da#rrr�dad,ard ddr r° rrdrrad, rrd raV r.:ara drh #.d ,ddrrrr drd,drdard#rac#...d#ar drrddra d"ddrrr r#... deaxi for that inl- g.&drone to determine in e,.NEr b�xit"Vdey thedr#aprrrr°X2.2. rau��...#dw rr�dddrs"��#dradd d ..dra"�raga rd a ick ,,,,ar#Pda ......, dart#edd`ra!g.........l grcks', cn' r:p a .eddrr at#cera#ar"as .,ae�rrradd ..aeer,a"era:ar:at h:a this,aaeer~td�ra shall, r"r tN;Vrd'tdr,°aida ni ddrp.. a�r��dd"gra dd��"d ria'° � d her tiara d�,ar gad .. ,...,,,,,...,,,,,,....,t,#.............................._.......,",.t.,.... _..........d................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. . ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,•.,,,,,,,......,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.....Y Y!................... •. rera:dd'r:aaar'aY;°r;raN"e iR.rd tddae' ddrie isd'aiva°pgre f variances iL, � Ur�°R# #rr a r� rrradt a dR�' P rR MtlLdr'rir"iC�rCadr'pJsst�ar"��n 1�. 'MNad#a hid _....................................................................z...................................�............................................................ .......... pp „��„m,,. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,, lf",...... „....................��...—....................�. ................................ cdda, rartdaarr r aid` ar err au #:aa M....Cee. e rreadd #esti#d L,e dr»:,s¢.r r#rrrdd#ad"ra 1 z edam ,M rat�erdar�ad',,�urrra rat err gid# �atd"sera (or................................ ...........................................•...,.....8.w..,,.., ........,.,_....,.................. ..._................................................................................................................................. ..................................................... .. as a� ,,,............,.,,,,�.,............,,Ned.......................................• 24 E3 Pg33 D �6PVi "P ia� !aq tN' � this ",�'.'hOfd lar.al sN�� iY� N��ti� � RC W;�di �m Kik P��i� N�"NY�R�� k�M�� the, Ixal i ?Fiia I�CPM"C"�`,�,�,,(s JNYR""NNa<red in iCk"rnggiCnk"kdr Iwith the 1ryRuaar"ar�k°r� aR�' ",Ur'"nrN'R';r r3aar°uiPnanna'r rNa r�rN'rrcu ^bd"a�ararr J,r:,.var rrk a .aa.rr ucaMa :ur'aava rrnkp � Vn ap, .araar a ,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,_..,_...._... ..............................................................................................r...�`,aM ar .marca ..........r................................ p°q ail 1.2LIML.I.I.1,12.2 rfr* »1 1 rk P be,d,rarnv idefv��u wrr��ar krc ��,� ��%�a��r�d.�...r�r�� a a�� mll aof��e',,.�:�a��.� �r� ��F��Mf��,k L�ry�; ��r��p� ,��,., m. _... aPrr'air :.....a �rrrr'r � u v u.a nn rr�F ^,r�k rk,Pa � c �r��r an ��r� �r�� a�� ,r��P��a��;�„��,��k�,�a��f�r��; ��kx��; �nk �d EN nrnr"k�raRie nls within a it �e L�t"�NV�V� ��",uuVik�k�M��C ie,��„R d R�J'i�r�WF`M°M aP �a� �4��d iC„,�' ��°d�Ib�u��NSN�,;k�� N�,�d� R PF�� a ��” ...... ,,,,,, .,,,, .. ..,, ()rcrrnac�unac ra rar°1ve lifal fan a /I s �d��,forl��...I a ��if Kj.�g ��va�it r-R�„��i�eac ,,;�k it,hin the zr�„f��,�„ra r��ur��o-,�s�of�h�hether�...Vile.... .... annak i� -rn aPJn� r.0.^.FN..d¢";.r.V.k d'.NGrN`...Li�.N�"a ceN�Snrn��Dr aiC 4' C�r''� r�a%"d ��rJCd�u.r2 ear,not, NV d!_ ile r ii irar, P a �r r a @ NPM r i d I C r nP��r� ��$C a d""r.�hYPNP�"d"tion�k ik n~�,�KJYkP Yr_i `d"ikrM� '81�"�, __ _ _ aw___ __ rrurr �rrC p Nanr� shall R r far r k:u l Ir day k r rr a";arcarrar "aar vrr �r �%r rr rad Amit p ;dauaa seclion shall rakar rr...d rarr:rr,rr r?... r arrrrapt ak mar r c aaam..Y„ ca as dr ra aIrrav an�urrr.a�rran.c e cr.......e......parr a,t,,r,"kora ve......la.re rl,,, rq jE'j[ qj qr r�mmser!M�N�d" r a Vcoviil��i�"'u°ifM,.)n'P fee r�ur �%uaGr� n riEnve wMN�NV�*� YV.iC..” „ rn iF.�V'YJGnn aCr 'S dPr'r iC I ik �nW�riC rararr.... r�Ca9i, ik�d"k� ILg.;R".:p rk? arrear Ar'R ra n'r r kur'krrar �..._ aca rkar'rvr...ra ,,,.. I G rF ren cru r�_ r nrar r:r.:::. mach, �a��^�m�arvron�lua�r�rrwn� k��rr��n,,ff edif�r�� rrvrrr mrA.rFLL r�r fru°d,, a,r err r a,r ar raa srak”v;r,r s hzrve rhe fuvllr"�rafl peak �.a; rr"r�rrr c wkrA n fl ar iNrN„d"rrnrkiC iRFnSra,_rCGr M Sa cN iP rrtli�....!that V," rri( rP�ikbP than �V 'k n,naMrd° rf ik Vl� Sig �ln��r fl�DnNy�tNJP��_ r"YMrYN"g N9P��Ywl an k" ��FRpN�� &u�N'rar RlPrri��,..,,��PJR�rr�rcNr n"»nr�qiC�NhN rRl,nwc,,N�d�r'�,�w��n�rc"I�r��ri,�'eulnd it on �m r2� `rrnirain u iCRW;,ra aa�, *rh aa�"satfilzih n ipa°P iCn�nrpd�"m ifhe exisli g.., ' ,,cua°a� ac rra ..:rvPr soar n rry. r currra . ��r fpr �r,rk;r r k kar,r, a r�rc ac:n d dprr r-aP"law var��c;�rrkprd,r�,,,. 2,is A t a i I,ii"i I" Section XXX1XXX.- Puirpose This Chapter povff:fes for accessf,::rry dwelhing uin4s(.-)In Illcts developed or proposed to be developed with single.- farnily dwellfings, SQ,2ch accessory dvve[ings contribute needed housOg to the community's housing slock. Thus, accessory dwelling urifts are a residential use Which is consistent wah the Ger-mral Ph:M obJectives arid zoning regulations and which enhances housing opportunities, iriclu6ng near transit on single farnfly lots, Section XXX2XXX',' Applicability 'I'he provisions of H"ils Chapter apply to all lints that are occupied wRh a single farnify dwelling unit andzoned residerifiaL Accessory dwelling units do exceed the allowal)Ile density for the upon which Me accessory dwelling unil is located, and are a residential use that is cormisterit with the existing general plan and zoning de!:iignation for the lot, Section XXX3XXX. Developi-nent Standarcls Accessory Structures withinExisHing, Space An af.::cessory dwelling unit Mhin an existing space including the primary structure, attached or,detached garage or other accessory structure shall be permiRed ministerially viith a buil6ng permit regardless of all other standards within the Chapter if comjplying wili-r 1. Buflf,:fing and safety codes 2. Melpendent exterior access frorn the existing residerme 3, Sufficierit side and rear setbacks for fire safety. Acressoiry Structures (Attached and Detachd ,.rid) Generak 'I. The urift is rot intended for sale separate from the primary iresiidence and may be rented, 2. The lot is zoned for residential and contains an exisfirigll sing,,e family dyvelHng. 3. The accessory dwMiing unit is either attached to the existing dwelling or detached from the existing dwelling and located on the same lot as the existing dwelling, 4. The increased floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 50 percent of ffie existing living area, with a rnaxirirrurn increase in floor area of 1,200 square feet, 5, "i"he total area of floor space ffcor a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed 1,200 squarefeet, 6. Local building code requirerner-its that apply to detached dwellings, as apprc)priate. 7. No passageway shaV be required in conjt,jncfion with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit., B. No setback shall; be required for an existirig garage that is converted to a accessory dweilirig unit, and a setback of no more than five feet from the sAe and rear kat lines shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit that is constructed above agarage 9. Accessory dwelling units shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if they are not required for the primary residerice and may employ afteniative rrmthods for fire protection Pairklinq, 1. Pwking requirernents for accessory dwelling units shall not exceed one parking space per unit or per bedroorn, "ll"hese spaces may be provided as tandem parking,including on aro existing driveway or in setback areas, excluding the non driveway front yard setback. 2. Parf6ng is not required in the foHowing instances: The accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half mile of pubhc transit, including transit stations and bus stations. 26 E3 Pg35 The accessory dweNing i �,s Iloicated in the liV Downtown, XXX Ar�ea, YYY Corridor arml ;..;.'.',ZZ 0�::npoirtuiniity Area Tl"e acclessory dweiHiriig i IIs located withiin an arcll,irtectuira, Vly air,W histoihcMi, 9 sJi riiificairrt Nstoric V clHstlrict" * Mi-min an-stireet,parkirig perinr*Rcs are reqidlired but not offered tiD the laccupant of thip..acicesS.Mil"y dwisq,iinig ur-iit, * Whenfliere iis a car shaire vehible Iocated,wiffiin gone biolck of theacclesus ory cliwisilking Uillit ,3. F:ZeWaiceirrierit Pairkiing When ia i ciarpc�irt, oir clovered parking struch,ire is demolHslhed loircoinveirted irii cionp,mc:lto,on with the coiristinxtion of i acicesaory dwelhin, fit, paiii shaH W ble retpuired ,9 ur and rney km, lic.),cated in any cianfigiuratioin on t1he siair-irm lot as the acciassiory dwetking i Section X,XX4X,XX; Ill iew"rTift RiecliLl[reirnients AM Ps sha4 t�iie Ipeirrnittecl imuniMeiri�gtlly, in clo:mpliance wiUh thiis Cll,,naptlpr witlr6in 120 days of appNicattirii 1"he Coirnmuruity Dir,.,vedqprneint Drk..Ac:lo,rslWi issue a Ibruldiirng Iperrrnpt or zloriiing cerfificatle to lestalbilisti am aic.,,cessofy dvveHingunit ien com:Oiance with lihii Chapfeir if a[l apWicabie require eirneints are met iion Selcitiorii XXX3XXXXX,, as aT,:propirratle The Community IDleveicllpunrmsrnt [.)iiiectoir rriica Y approve aura accessory dweihng umit that is i urn cioirnOancle with Sechoiri XXXllWl'XXX as set forth ifrn Sec6lanXXX5XXXX "T'he XXX X HleaPtl,i Officeir sha'll aRprove an a Y x g p I pplicafior-ii iin coriforimancle with X XXX whereapnivate sewal le dtis osa! systerm ifs Ibeirnp used Section XXX5XXX. Review Pi-ocess far ,Accs eass oiry StruCtUre Nut Coirnplyirig "iritf-i �lI),L,velolp�r'n,eirit ,StEiiui,dairlds Ain accessory dwiefling Lllnlitthat i not cc)mply,Mh stairildaircls in Section XXX3XX may pleirrinMed i a zorling ceirfificate or an aid rrr irii I stirati vc,, usepeitt kine imetmion of the CoirnrnuriityE)ev6lopirinent, Director Subject to findiings in Siectioin XXX6'XX Section XX,x6,X)(X!: F Midings E A Irii cirder to dery i adminilsltr�.,ilhvle! use pern"M under Sieclti.)n XXX5,KXX fliie CoimMiLlln�ify Devi-,4oprnent Director shall hinid that tl�m AlrcessM NK wMiiing'Unit WOUld 1:)e detirirnentat W the ptfbIlic 1"ieWth aind safli or wolullid introduce unireascinabie pr:ivalcy impaicts to the miiiniediate ireight)oirs El kn lordier toapprove an adirnir-iistirafive use pern"llit uirideir Sielci iicm XXX5XXX to waiive reqt,�ired aic;cesslary dwiellNirig i Ipaildrig, the Gomirnuiniity Deve[opirriient Dirieclor-shail find that aiddiboinall or new om sine parking wotfld Ibe detnmentaI ar-rdtf,iiat granting the wally it milI irneet tlie puqpuir,)rses oftliusGhapateir Section XXX7XXX: Dipfinffion!s i Living area i the Interior habRable aresof a dwipiking uirift iirickadiJng basemeirits and attics but does not incLuan garage oir any accessory St(LIcture, (2) "Acicessm Y dw6tHirig unit' meansanattalchied or a detached resiidieint�al dweNincl i whiclii pirlavides coirnpllieile indepierr dBrut Ili iing faciflities for i or runlor�� Ip leirslcairm It st,ii,M iinclude Ipeirrirnsrncrnt jpirovi§ioiriis for-fiv4ig, isIeep;riig, lealting, COOklilr1g, airlildsairiftalion oirr tJ-iie sairnie pairi:O as thesingie faimily dwe"Hirig is sitiva,,t1i An aciCeesory dweIfirig unift i includes ffie f0cmirig ,(A)An effic'li,eincy i as defined in Slelcliiian 17958,1 of I ealh Bund Safety Gode,, i A manLlfaCftlri.7,d i-mmel, as defined in Section 1810107 of&iiie llleaffl,-ii arld Safety Code, (3)"Flassaiglaway" rriiesuns a paatlrway fli-iiat is Lriinot)stiructed dlie arto itlim sky arild exteirids froirn a street ito lonei airice of theacclessory dweVHirilg luinit 27' E3 Pg36 (4) (1) "E)dsfiinlg, SI:irucAurell' 'coir the c9 ddhing an abwsWe ;pea MW can be coinveirtedN,) ain ACA.)irneainsi wRhhi the four YoWs anid irlocilhinle of any MmIum eAWhg an wwRw Jwwmy 1, 2017 that canbe,, rinwle saWy IWWWWe umler JoaW bullng codes at Me dWwmKaWn of Me bWWbg officW iregarid[ess of any inori-.coimp�kairllc'e wRh mMpg sLanduds 28 E3 Pg37 Drat,Ainior Accessory Dwelling Units (JAIDIJ) Flexible Housfing Findings- 1 Causation, critical rleed for hf.:)usingfor lower income,families arif.:1 in6viduals given the high cost of living and low supply of affordable homes for rent or purchase„ arld the difficufty, given the current and ecorlurnc erwironment, in N.Wding rnore affordable housing 2 Khgation", Create a sfirnple and inexpensive perirnittirig hack for the development of junior accessory dwe li ling unds that allows spare bedrooms in hornes to serve as a flexible form of ir-lU housing 3 ErldangerrnentF:Imvisions currently required under agency on:firlances are so arbWary, excessive, or burde:Ilnsorne as to restrict the abilqy of homeowners to legal develop these umls therefore encouraging horneowners to bypass safety standards and procedures that remake the creafiq,:)n of these units a berlefit to the whole of the community 4 Ca:)--Beneffts:, Homeowners (pairtioAarly retired seniors and young farniiiies, grmips that tend to have die lowest incomes)-generating extra reverlue, allowing people facing unexpected finandal obstacles to rernW,r)in theiir homes, housing parents, chi&erl or caregivers, Honnebuyers -providing rentW income wNch aids in mortgage quakfication under new gf,:wernment guWeNnesl Reriters -creaUng more Ilow -cost housing options in the corn munily where they work, go to school or have family . 1, also reducing conunul[e We and expenses Municij,)alities hellak)g to meet FRIANA goals, increasmg property and silos tax revenue, insu6r-ig s.a;ey standard code cornplianf.,-.e, proviftg an abundant sou roe of affordable housing vvs th no adf:fiflonal infrastrii.icture needed, CornrnunRy-hous4,lg vital workers, decreash--ng traffic, creating econornic growth both in the remodeling sector and new customers for local businesses, IFlianet.-reducing carbon emissior-is, using resources more efficiently, !i Benefits,of Junior L.)&: offer a more affordable housing option to both homeowners and renters„ creating ecorlornicail;y heafthy,diverse, muftkgeneratiorlW communihes, "Therefoirp, the following ordnaroce iiia hier6by einacted, This Section provides standards for the eMabfishment u:.)f jiunor accessory dvve$ng units. an allernahve to time stairidard accessory q,:,NveUiing unit permitted as set forth under State Law AB '1866 (Chapter 1062, Statutes of 2002) Sectioiris 65852 150 and 65852,2 aiiroid subjeic,(to Vferent provr sions under fire safety code,,,-, based on the fact that junkar accessory fJwefhng units nolo slot qquaiify as`cornp[ete indeperldent Irving facilities"given that the inledor connechorlfrorn U'le junior accessory dwelflng u.unit to the main Iwing area remakns, therefore not redefining the single-farWllly home status of the dwellklg unif. A) Development Standards, Junior accessory dwe[finig units shah Comply with the followirig standards, indluding the staridarii::is in Fable below 1) Number ofUnits Allowed Only one accessory dwelling unit or,junior accessory dwelfim urR, may ff,)e locWed on any residentially zoned lot that pernalts a single-farnily dwelling except as othervVsle regu�.-,ited or restricted Illy an adopled Master Plan or Precise IC evelopmerit Plarl. A junior accessory dwelling unit may only be located on a lot whk,,,,h already conl:ains one legal single-farndy dwelling, 2) Owner Occupancjl.,"The owner of a parcel proposed for a jurlior accessory dwelling unit shalh occupy as a principal residence either the primary dwelling or the accessory dwONng, except when tl-m Ihomrme is held by an agericy such as a land trust or housing cq.;arlization in an effort to create affordable housing 3) Sale Pnalfil)ited:A junk,::oir accessf,::Pry dwelling unk si-mil not.be m1d independefty of fi--*primary dwelliirq ors the parcell. 29 E3 Pg38 4) Deed Restriction:A deed restriction shall) be corripleted and recorded, in compliance with Section B below. 5) Location of Junior Accessory Dweffing Und. A jurilor accessory dwell4ig unit must be created within the existing wails of an existing prin-mry dwelling, and must include conversion of an existing (bedroom, 6) Separate EntrY Required:A separate exterior entry shall be provided to serve a jimior accessory dwelling unit, '7) Interior Entry Remains:The interior connecticin to the rnain living area must be maintained, but a second door may be added for sound attenuation. 8) Kitchen Requirements: flie�unlor accessory dwelling unit shall include ar--u efficiency kitchen, requiring and limited to the following components: a) A sink,wfth a maximurn waste line diameter of one-and-a half(1.5) inches, b) A cocking facility wRh apphance which do not require electrical service greater than one hundred-and twenty (120) volts or naturall or propane gas, and c) A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are reasonable to size of the unit. 9) Parking, No addftiona3 parking is required beyond that required when the existing primary dwelling was consh'ucted Development Standards for Junior Accessory Dwelling Units Maxirniuirn unit s4.e 51010squarie feet �3 S Asreq,L4ed fioir thie p6mary dwelkUll W'flt ......................................................... lIarklng too addM(.:)inaI parkNnq requ'Iired ............. ............. B) Deed Restriction, Prior to obtair'Ong a buillUng permit for a junbr accessory dwelling unit, a deed resWction, approved by the City Attorney, shall) be recorded with the County Recorder's raffice,which shall include the pertinent restrictions and hmutat%ons of a junior accessory dwell,ng unit identified in this Section. Said deed restriction shall run with the land, and shWl be binding upon any future owners, Iheirs, or assigns. A copy of the recorded deed restricton shall be filed w4h the Department stating that: 1) The junior accessory dwelling un"t shal6 not be sold separately from the primary dwelling unit; 2) The junior accessory dwelift unit is restr,,,,cted to the maximum size allowed per the development standards-, 3) The�unior accessory dwelMg unit shall be considered legal only so long as either the primary residence, or the accessory dwelling unit, is occupied by the owner of record of tine property, except when the home is owned by an agency such as a land trust or housing organization in an effort to create affordable housing: 4) The restrictions shall be binding upon any successor in ownership of the property and lack of compliance with this provision may result in legal action agaonst the property owner, including revocation of any right to rnaWWn a junior accessory dwelling unit on the property, C) No Water Conneclion Fees INo agency should require a water connecbon fee for the development of a junior accessory dwelling unit. An inspecUon fee to confirm that the dwetfing unft complies with development standard may be assessed, 3() E3 Pg39 D) o Seurea.Conu�nnect�pm Fec-s:IPNlo age�rncy T'uiruuudd re n~uiire a seweir c nnecdoin if 'foir tl'�hle divl'opm nt of ju.urn'ioir accessoiry lepdiiuirl ��u�rn�d Arn lir s: :.l� �ru�hal�un"n'fee to confirm r' that p�hn� �d� 6Illlpr"u� U n'd'p��;�uumup hes�✓tlh dev�edl�lpinueir'p�>p, rud r im ayn be assessed. E) No F:ire� S'Prinn�kler a anrp F'a°(e Afte ntrap�ion: ll'Npu ageinc'y slhnm, d riruq upre sire spriirul4rd� it loir'fain"le e3ttiLlinuefilon spielr i icationu ri'fr,un 'Tl-n develinpin,ilent sof a jurnrrodou°aiccessiiry dva lk)g Unit An hrislruecfion fele t�o cor4irrn ppv p the dwellliirng U nitn n)r I,nlliies wii'fp°nrdev: eIlop:nimernt t irntlard may be assessed. Aces tory cdwek ng a.urndp" m eoi ns ai n attaiched or a rdr.yar;liied urnsnc,denhM r„viellldm°ng uur'niiy�nrd°un,�lhu provdes clninnp�llete dun epuen"ndeM hvvig p' 6hfies flor r;oie lu r �sdpsaincdrdrper� u �erilee�h°n ,f . eating, irodlkdrupp, and ainii'afion un 'dlhE-� &arn prir�cep as the kdrngle-f�ainniillly dwe hi ng os sAl a ted Araccesslcuiry d� eVFng, u ni'd:also dnr,;A a es ylhue yc,ullll amrna,;p (1) Ami lefficiency uurnn'd,, rens defined dru Seclhon 179:58 1 of He allldh airidSaifety Colde ( ) I°'*irne, ars ir:d firm d in Slec(ioir '1E.d1011C.7 ofh-peaRh and Safety Jn.umor Fr ciessory u::dwdkli�n uad�A' Mieclir S a Uncut that.us crura more plhn�airo x.100 aware feet in sze �a�ru�d clonpau n�ed enpiiu,relly wlthi�dru an exiis'fiiinir gni iun lll� �'y� rr�tlp�y �rwurihuqu°rr pn.urnd r u �� r,�V dvo ddairg Aurn'k rmay'dn+danuwde sieparate arviy� 'born p cilupu,s, or rm ay^ sIhare saniftabloin 'f cNllubes Wiph the exiistih nir.,p sprucilur 3 1 stat"le111"t"I d s C e c"; s s c,f J�a i-I ry am mm Imp mr itis no:it intencted'For saile sep�� ted,, L.ot is zoneld For sirigile-fairnily ioirMUIVERrInfly USe anid roiriit6iiriis an exuslling, sirigile- 65852.2(a)(1)(D))i�it IF rinfly ldwieOfirxl. ............................ /\lcces ::iry id%�efling tviit is efther attaichedlo trim existing rivieNinU or Ilrnraated 658522(a)(l)(D (i:ii w6iiin the Iloa inig area nif fli-m r.:�xisUnig dwieffing or cletactiedl from the existing ,dweilHng and Ilocater.1 on'thie same lot as ift'ie,existarn g d1weilliling, incireased fio�,)r ars ea of am ftached P,,iiccessory dweViiing unit dioes noit exiceed 510 658512(a)(1)(D)(fv perclpW of the existbg fiving area, with a rna),drinurin increasia in fk)iar area of ........... .... "T"otal area of floor spaerr, ltrar a detached aciressoiry dweEHing u,iiniit diiies not exceed 65,E!t52, 21(a)(1)(D)i(v 1,200 si�::iluare feet,, ......... 1P .. ,1,- — — - F;Iassagevvays aire not reqUired in cr.mPinction with tille coinstirtxbon of am 65,8522(a)(1)(f))(0 aa'ices sir..),ry dweiHng unR, ............. ..................................."I................ ........ .... .............. ....... Setbacks are not rf',,quired for an exisding gan:.Ige that is converted to an �:.�ccessnry dweHing u,inftj, and a selback of no more thain five tel frorn tN,,.�gide i) and rear lot firms are mA recpjiliriedfoir an act',essory dweHing MR that is icon stru ateid albovegaralge. ibu,6k:9gng code realquiiireirnleiniis ft t apipty to detached dweEiimys are met, as 16,5�B a2, a)(1 (D)(v i apprapdate, 111) ............ I-local hiaaRh officeir apprc;wM willlerp a private sewage tkspos��:fl systern is being used, ff reclOred. Pairkirig reCILfirenneirits do riot e,M;eed mine p�rkinngl space per'LU'llit or peir 1ei�,Jrlo) orn 1655852.2(a)(l)([.:))(xese species rinay Theroviided as laindernarkiinig un Iaiirn dri%pieway. ................... ................. Other re,Mkreirnerits i 6 a,i): 'y,, See Governir-nerit Clode Scroon 5852.2 P, 32 E3 Pg4l Reports nl�Y I I p p ANG ib nN llf f p, nl� n N N nN:U Nff gap:a y i Uano'dnn StalesII'Del airfiarnif Of I-illnUmng arnd iII::lra�vadgjpiii, Office Of and FRessairclln. (2iCU08) gun'fra un�ra�cnpc�un. Quocc�ss�crpy cUwitapllurn urnufs � iDUs�) .I nalso referred Uic asp anccassIcary a;paifti nnanfs.ALUs. or granny flats are arpdiofirunnaf li0ing. qu.uarflau`s Arnim shin lle-famnililly lotsthat area i1irnir:U�apicunderiit ofthe Ilion iiiurar1i dwewapfirnfg t mif Me �sap:aairafe iivicgslpaces arra u'a�gt.flgmp.ueid wiltaunlrU Ihuaahnir�aoni f�"iaciilliiflias, amn carn Ilan aiiffneiiield lcr iu:paf�ar;,hlar.0 fricunn the rnnaifmn t silUaincr "ll'his cas unfiuU'y ax,alores I'ncwfhie arlc)nforn of rirlrifa �nlres, Mili rediuireregulatory mes'R�rfcfioirns fru encourage ADIUIs, c*irii be advamnfau iru,,Dt,us for r::,cairinmmnluirngflias FoHmMing an of fl'iie nwaruOukuS fNwilnas of AIDIIA aunrf 'ffnaaiir benefits, flhnis case sfu.,rdy Ipmcviir:Uaus examrrnp ies of manu.micip:alki'dpas with succassfUl iDli.0 aaiiisilatioru aii prog airrms Secbion fpflles ihrniii p....piisfuary cf ACYL.Us, Types of Aicn:es�sory U:::M61fdnirg i II eiricfpUs�cf �, ccessory Dwir,'Huig Units, and IEX�Irairnnp:allas of,A'DU u"dgmnamnr�cs and If::,pircgir�aims By B111 Wh f owwslf�aaf —ifU�d:,,a,anLam°nirl 'pmnsiftuta (201�4) 1....ulh:arau°yP Calkl# H43 1 M33 '2014 flhnla Il.�rfna��c �h,,,.aun uinsfiflu.rda� i'lu.uUfofamnn�flly Il...lhcu.usiirm C',ouunc'Hs weIra u;awauulan::U a 'gfp_f'Fralu.uuniafucun research grant in Badu x"013 to la^�vuOiiup!afa^ fuoirin anmiuulbipl�e ;peas alcfirves f�kmcrunarlhraf plm.-,ir'nrrrnarncaa and M�arkef a�cclap,atarncla acf irrnlicirc ariid smnnap'N Units 'Ih, �nf �f2i D TO�6��IH,A- f�lING FIC.) JSE Uf„Up.DS II�� un9�af�un�h � Nn�llll �n I��rn� Il ni�n�nc ��mite gull Acr„ raw .. V„ P I & n..,,.,.,.,„..�,.�..,,,..,,-ryr�-.�..:�m, .� ,,,,,,,,, ,,,, ��r��II�—� a ��.��.�,�o��,rvrvrv�rr. �.,.�,rrrrrr�, I 'y Vicdwi IBuawwsmn, 'Benjamin G:i,oss, aaunrU ,.ol.uru lunifrarnca (210 4) p`%,d w.nw'Yar�k ILtniversity Furman Ganmfair for Estate & fl�ruky Library CaH# X55 3 1147 2101 'IlFhf�wuunf�f�s� IFii�rsf. we pir�o v�i�tl�a a detaHed aun,ndlysfs �cf ugs'd�rflhaiifs^If�agpsu�fills two �gaps, imn fJlnra rUu�slcn.ussiicomr, n"lcg�au°dnm°nJ cn,-rou.u.n:aac� dllnar ra lulafuq mind lutheir clhn�,;alliernles fic dlevek:)iptn9 lnlcplhir ADILPS,arildl mnruiciro-uunills, fccuus�urng warn five cofu,as New Ylod,�a, WasIfingfcmn„ II C", Austin: Iun iruver- and Seatfle, f`l�n�af armadysns wflld bib Ilne'glgn'ftfl mhc�p,o�rAy funs tfuic s,pec�nfuaa,Ijlu,udsdiii: i m1s,w �sfu.ndl bu.uf aullsrn c�ain serve gas a rung idir^d for fIl°mins wIhn�c n,rvlhn�af to callapuul, lnuna regulatioins that unngght eU nr�n fJhnla�w�nagv of f,fnna de%iappcp::aumnannf of ccunn;gpacf urnofs in 'thiiair own jjurnscUucfau.arns acrumii1d, as rnoirle iocag giovwwrriirrnamn!ks parirnniif or ericcuralge oinipacf uirnits �resau:Iiirl ll°uiairs wlill nicield fnp rev alln,u,ata liio w awweNp ithe uunpfs burn�dlhf serve flhnc goalls piroporilents cp iia.. flhn ^y wfllll. �f N II NII ifUllfa vmllf�f .,,. a lff� t)NIf R E �Y"'T O� lllm��mI �IN�.��AS.� f�.,BA�. Yfcls �rld ml�n� .. ... . o_.. � � IIIr��n�uNll�n �ii�uilir�w y J,albra'Wuap:arrnairnrn Nision Namnngruiw- and Il�gaan�au�n�K�fn��a'�Gm��p�s�(dp'P012) C Rerkleieyl IlunsCU,ufe icf Um'fuairn i l eiicmnuallIDe velicfO�rn�namart ��Ilu�p�RID) Library CM# I....1144 1 133 ' 01; Thngs IpaU:uair d.burns by aruallyzhng II'°naww mmianrngf srwcu:mclary r.uruiifs of oii nus II-"' rf,ilm,Aar tyllpna danfu,na hed backyard craft fpuas, u~nmf ll°nf II'oeIIbLilppf imn the East Bay, fccu�suung on the Flaffamnids Iii of Bieiirkeley, IB f'"au-�rg�fc, a cl Oakiland We ffuuawrn iunveuu bigafua the g,nlcfarnfial limnnll:lacfs'of Scallill-iiig n,ufu the sfu afar gy w firth ragwd ft.) h0US:illlg a ufflar�daG,ue ity, srrniarf growth, �allfarrn�ufve frannsp or'fafocrn�, flhnuN ercloincwnnyl, and c'mfy Ih:purlll atsA final siacfgoun details Ihu,n:.)Elicry uacicu,nine,-nii.��ru�daf'pouns, fcuciusuin irrrn riagidla'doirraf�cnrin�s arid ru�k'�fnar�a�cUiorns�c�iifli�ss carn'fal4a�as fan aaunc�cr�uur°ag�a �s�s�c�ar-id«..ur� �ru�un'pf u,.�aun��SU"IUcf��i�nurn„ Stich as pir,cminting caarsfnari ng priog ranimns, e&,iicaFiril9 resin lairnts, amni1:::uiiroVldirig „access to fi narnr,,a. N d:U Pg42 :::("( NDXRY IUM"IFS AM'.) 4,JRBAN IHFILI.: A fitemlture Rli-'-wiiir:,,,w ,3 - - ................................. ..........11...................................................................................... .............................................................................. ..................................................................(1.2 p By Jakle'VVlc,--qi-lnann ancl,Aliison Neii"nirow(21011) U,C: Blerkelleq, ILYRI) I brary i# ID44 4 21 �S43 2011 This Iliiteratuure review examines the re!.',earch on iniNill devebpnileiil in giemerall, i seclondairy units in pairtiWar, witl-n aii n eyc-^ Wwairds it.,midwstainding Uhe stmHarifies Ev'wl diffleirences betwelen iinfiflHl as it lis rrmii"le tiradiMunafly uii--!rlder!Moiacl .Le., the ldevellopii-mer'A or reldevelopiment of enfire Ilan" ,IIs of liaii-'ltild iiii-ii in Wirealdy Lllll)@Irniized area ancl Uiile oncrerrii&Mall type of iirntiillll that selroriiidairy unit dem6lopmeii"A irl S TUEY Ll::T IUS Bl�MI D? r1rie Fiegsilb�Hiti 0., 'Condar Uni� 1(17 pp W�I�L�L I Us .....................................................I................... ...................................................................—......................................................................Y ia.I p ............... El:v kliis'crii iqc.,-rrnirow Karen Chalj:::qplle(2012) L l IBerl4ralay FLARID Lbr,,..'-,ury GaIll 9 1,14,4 :5 '1 1 1"47 21012 T'Ns vi a diaurssion of how to deteirrniiiae dieve[ol,:)iment Ipolleintial for selcoinidaii"y un"ililts, and tlhe,n riry uinilsi cain be Wilt 4'o the East !Bay of Sain Fraincislou 13n:Yy Area urkleir prowdes i overview of hcm many seicoii : currant regIL1tF3bOlnS, Tt',e nex!ttwio sect,oins exaim4ile Ikey regiWatoiry barriers iiun diet affil for the five cities in tl'-ie" stlucly (Albairiy, Bleu kek.»y, 1::l Ceii-irito, Oaktainid, m,)d Richmond), Iln ok',rng at Ilotsiizir.:,, setbadks, IparUriirmg ripiq,UremeiMs, and proic,eidulral ILmriruara. sen§ifiOty ana[ysis then rUeUrrrnnniiriws Ihow rnany luinits i bir Lm.fift,were Uhie rl&9UIalblnll"IIS tO ll::ue ii-e[axed. YES IN II BAGKYARD� fvloblllizzjing_Lhie t for Secoirdacy i ........................................................ Q.��jjts (20 jpp� ............................................. — lBy Il arerii,Chapple, J. Weigrinanin,A Nipir6irlcw and C. DeintekPiost.(2011) UlC Beii'!ki Clariitiarfoir Gorm-nurifty lii"iirlovadoirn I ilbrary CaH 11 `)(47 2011 Thos stluldy lexiaimiirnes' WilD r:)Uzzles that must besoNied un carder tic.)SIC@Vle Ulp a slecoinidary ii.mnilit strategy- first, hcwcan c;Ry rirzgu,.fllatiliairs best eii--iiafflethieir construction?And secianid what iis the market fc)IF SEIICOndary units? R..'.ecaiuse p�:Irkiiinig is sludh air�impoirtairit lisslue, we iaUsloexaimiriie Uhe pintprftii�i:lfl fW SiPCOIFICial'y uirilRire§idients toirOy on akerirmfive b'aii'iisportatIlDFIl rnodes, pairtliculOar carsl'nalrle Ipirlcgrarrns. The sbuidy Ilraolks iat flive acillairemiticRies in thle East Raly Of tlr're Sain F::'ranbsco Ray Area (Fillguru�,:* 'I) -® Claklarid, BieirkiaVey, Albany, El Cir.:,ririiltio, '@irnd Richimoinid —foimAiing on this aii"eas vVithin Ila irriiOu Df five Bay Aima Rapid Transit (RARI") staUluns �: i Jint,.tirna'N Airi aiu"iild 'Woirkung Papers- B,ACK"i I QM[="S II.....A(17 plp) �By Dana Cluff, "I"urn Hggiins, and F"er-J6N:11irn Dal'fl, Elds, (2(H10) F:4.�,,lgeriits iof the Uiniiversfty of Gi-,--.Olvforinaa, Los Aingeles City Lab IProiect Book II)EVELOPING PRNATE ACCEII-311SOFRY DWELLPi pi)) �By Wi0fli IP. Macht Urbahi"Oarucll o6line,, (Juirie 261, 2,01 U) Libirari y Linicaflon Urb�i:::H'-fland 74 (314) March/Aprill�201�5, pp. 1:54-116 1, 34 E3 Pg43 GF?,AIII`qN'Y FtAT.. ..................A.................I....N................I.....NG.....................G...................R.............1......1..1........J....I.''ND(2 By Biri Barth IPlannuingg Magaziiirre:: pp 116..17 (Apird 016) Hbirriary II cicatroiry Sii "IJ011YEN11"2QMSF"1,I "'HIE' ROTENIFIA01. DIF ShAAL.L-SCALE INF-R.L. DEVELOPMENT(2 pp') lBy Kairien Ct-iiap;:Oe (21011) I PC E.:.leirke�IieyIILYRID PirriNcy Bidef. Gaill#D44 1 ;2 1 153 210"d1 California's linn usliainalt4te CoinuTILM"Ofies snid Chat imle F:1ratecHion Act of 20081, is, putUirrg plernerrtation of SIB 375 Hrj(.,.,, S niew lNeSSUirle Of'r GOM11"Unities tosuplPloirt infiR, As mebropdftain ji;::Oianrning loirrganiziaUcins T'itirt,rggle tlD riiieed for density, they shlou'Id Lake i of sbratec.Oes that rnakle imreasiing deirrsity Rin alftractiive chloice for neiigl'iborhoods and ireagilarua Ffll".YDENIDENIill'T'Y' IIIb, SINGLE-FAM�J.'yr BqlclrgarrrP Lpj,'jg �9,j[pffftg[gu t_(22 Ipip Ely Jake Welgirinianin and Karen Qhappe Jounirriial of Lhlbanirsffr 7'(3). j,')p 3O7.329 (2014) (inot avaflabie pn fuH text),! Seicoiri unrits, oir!sepwate sirriali dweflungs erninidded Within sinc..�ie family riesidentiai prolparties, constitute a frieliquenfly lovie,,dooked strategy for urbain Infiki in ['�Ipigh-cioslnrietropr.:�Itiliain areas Iiii r the Unled Stafc:s "fiiiis siluldy, vd-iirh JssIlivateid vvi!Wiiin Cafifoirnia's San Frar-ilcisco IRay Area,, draws i data cloflectled firoirm a Il,iiininieowineii's' !su.,rrv,Ey,ancI a RentM Mairket Air mlysis to providle evildencle 'tltnal a scMied-it,rpstrategy emphasiizihng one llyl,ne ofsecondairy i ,the Itmickyarld cioltalge could yiiMldsuhrstant4l infiIi growth with rw'-�tniimal pt.bhc subs�idy ln a&fitioin, it is found ChatU'urristraiteigy comparles favloiraNy irr terinvis ofaffordabdity WUI-n infilki of thie slarl tiradifloinalHly favored in 'time 'st'nairt.lgrovAl Ihhilleralturell it e the coirristrUction of dense inirwitifarnilly hilousing devOlopmerits RETI-flNKIING FIRrvA,"rE ByWillham F), IlViacht Urbanparidonhne (KarrJh 6 21015) 11.tlbrairy I oloatilon Urbairflariiid 74 (112) J arn u a ry/F"lebru a ir y 2015, pp,, 1137.91 ADIU13, AND 1-1011 At�Ih ALES II R(D,KEN Feil III II T'EiM 1(4 ......... 113y CARI YI E VV I IM "Phe Ranini,iirig Report (Apirii 26, 2,0116) III aind-iuse attioniney Carlyle K HaH clorinimlerrits on lbiufllidring purnftsfoir aiccessoiry dweikirrilig u.units l [III 10Nd' CA[::� COLORADO GFIFY NSTAN'III l Y CREA,FED AFFORDABLE:� IlOUSM.3 leyAntiv::my Fbint (May 17, 2016) ki IDuxrairigo, 1Colorado, zoning FU18'Swi chane ger.ttau all, frau irMairme, rii:')in-faTni[y inverribers as residlents lin a',,,rew::lIy-exisUrig eux�lssory dwieffirig units NEW HAMPSIFURE WINS F"ROTEC"PIONS F�'O�R)NC,(,'�IE,,�'SO�R�' E)VV�E�L�I IINIG LAHTS (I ................................................................. ................. ................. ..................................................................... mm.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,........................................... NUI 1C (IlMarch 28, 2016) Affordable 11"im.ising advocakes ori New Hampshhre celebrated a iae�prntf ant viicliory thiis morith mbein Governor Maggie i lassan, sigried :Seriate BOil 146, legislMicrn Mal Oraws sdngle-f-arrrHy hoinirii,.ilowneirs to add an accessory 3�5 3P 44 dw6lhng u.uunut RS 8 unrna'pp r f right thrim,igl,i a connr.tlitiouniall uu e p ei nnop sur I::ay special excieptloin as deterirmuirned by Rheur rrnn,uriiii iipnal: tiles ...T'he Ip::idlll reinnovies U,�pirniifiicai~nt regUl tmY barto mcr sari n"u„snniU�� Ilnin mos at u'no a„ s'p.10 taxp ayes s NEW IIIN-II....AW 5'U,...IVp..I1...'I JUILI[E. U OI..,USHNIG IIIIN INIIF::R ANUSCO, (3 pp a y IFRiolb Poole. ,'�"ihar a'Uale. (.luirne "II0, 21014). The Saini Firainicii Board Of SUpervisairs t cern ly approved t'odvc)siigii.,,n!ihc nnt p:u cle of Il gii Nabi n p.Nn,ap siuppawil accessory dweUhng u.uniiit (AM Is) ku'n uvvlr. na n,,ileo Ili w”�or sielcoirii,Hardy unuiriliilu . in Ulhira un'ality.- L.)SING ,A1 � "SII:::::: S1::: RESOLUTION Nt0,16- 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC201 -00606, AMENDING REQUIREMENTSA D STANDARDS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A, Recitals. 1, The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared Municipal Code Amendment 10 2 16- 00606, as described in the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution„ the subject Municipal Code Amendment is referred to as "the application". 2. Can August 8, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga condUCIed a noticed public hearing can the application and concluded said hearing on that dale, . Alf legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. E, Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined® and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows, 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals® Bart A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2, Based upon the substantial, evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 6® 2016 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. General Plan Housing Goal HE-1 promotes the creation of new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types" maintain a balanced suppty of ownership and rental units" and provide sufficient numbers of dwelling units to accommodate expected new household formations; and b. General Plan Land Use Policy LU-1.1 encourages the protection of neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment; and C. By developing a revised ordinance governing accessory dwelling units,„ the City is permitting A U's as required by State law" with provisions to ensure that they are compatible with the main dwelling unit and surrounding neighborhood. 3. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ( EQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under Section 15232(h) of CEQA which establishes a statutory exemption for the adoption of an ordinance regarding second units in a single-family or multifamily residential zone by a city or county to implement the provisions of Sections 65852.1 and 65552.2 3 P4fi PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO,18-52 MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00606 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA August 8, 2018 Page 2 of the Government Code pertaining to ADUs. The proposed code amendment is consistent with this exemption. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve Municipal Code Amendment DR 2018-00606 as indicated in Attachment A incorporated herein by this reference. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 113Y; ........................................... 11::Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST-. Candyce Burnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga® at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August 2018, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E3 Pg47 DRAFT ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO , AMENDINGAMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE DWELLINGDEVELOPMENT OF ACCESSORY I CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORTTHEREOF The City Coulncil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga, has prepared Municipal Code Amendment DR 2018-00606, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Municipal Code Amendment is referred to as "`the amendment . The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (the "City"") is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California. , Over the years, the City has adopted ordinances pertaining to second dwelling units to address municipal options and iSSUes presented by changes in State law. C, In 2016, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 1069, Assembly Bill 2299, and Assembly Bill 2406 into law- The legislation clarified that second units would be referred to from this point forward as , DU's and effectively nullified the City's existing Second Dwelling Unit chapter of the Development Cade (17,100). Cities have the option to adopt local regulations to implement the new legislation of default to State law for the regulation of DU's, The legislation did permit a certain amount of discretion if local regulations are adopted. D. On the 6th day of August, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing with respect to the amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, issued Resolubon No. 16-52, recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment. E. On the 5th day of September 2018, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the amendment and concluded said hearing on that date. F. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. SECTION 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, this Council hereby finds and concludes that the changes proposed to Title 1 (Development Code) in the amendment are consistent with the General Plan goals, policies and implementation programs, General Flan Housing goal HE-1 promotes the creation of new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types,: maintain a balanced supply of ownership and rental units, and provide sufficient numbers of dwelling units to accommodate expected new household formations. The development of accessory dwelling units provides an opportunity for additional development of low- and moderate-income housing. General Plan Land Use Goal LU-1.'1 encourages the protection of neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the Draft Ordinance®-Fuge 1 of 7 ATTACHIMENTA E3 P4 residential living environment. The standards proposed designed to minimize impacts to surrounding and existingresidential neighborhoods while ensuring compliance it State law. SECTION 3, Planning Department Staff has determined that the roct is statutorily exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (C ) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under Section 15282(h) of CEQA which establishes a statutory exemption for the adoption of an ordinance regarding second units in a single-family or multifamilyresidential o y a city or county to implement t rovisions of Sections 65852.1 and 65852.2 of the Government Code pertainingto ADUs. The proposedamendment is consistent with this exemption. SECTION4. Chapter 17. (Second Dwellingits) of Title 17 (Development of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby deletedin its entirety and replaced as follows: "CHAPTER 17.100 ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS Section 7® 1 m Purpose. Section 17.100,020: tic ilii . Section 17.100.030: Approval Required. Section .100.040: Development Standards. Section 7.100.050: Design Standards. Section 7. Historic Buildings. Section . Ownership ccRequirements. Section 7® Existing its. Section a Conversion istiSpaces to AccessoryDwelling i . 17.100.010 s . The purpose of this chapter is to establish eve o t standards for the construction and operation of accessory dwelling units on lots zoned to all.w single-family or multifamily use and including rc se or existing single-family dwelling in a manner that is consistent with the requirements o tate law. 17.100.020 is i it . The provisions oft is chapter apply to all lots that re zoned to allow single-family or multifamily use and include a proposedor existing single-family dwellin . Accessory dwellingunits shall be deemed to be an access.ry single-family residential us ich is consistent with the existing General an and zoningdesignations forte lot. The addition of an accessory dwelling unit shall of be considered to exceed the allowable density of the lot upon whichsuch unit is proposed to be established. 17.100.030 ApprovalRequired. The application for an accessory dwellingnits all be reviewed for compliance ith the provisions of this section through the plan check/zoning check/zoningclearance process. The application shall be approved or deniedwithin s after the Cityreceives the application. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Coe trate contrary, no minor exception from ny requirement of this chapter shall be approved, nor shall any application for such a minor exception be accepted for processing. Draft Ordinance® Page 2 of 17.100.040 Development Standards. All accessory dwelling units shall comply with the following development standards-, A. Number of units per parcel. No more than one (1) accessory dwelling unit shall be allowed on a sin le lot. An accessory dwelling unlit shall not be allowed on a site with more than one existing or proposed dwelling unit, B_ Code Compliance. Accessory dwelling units shall, be constructed in accordance with provisions of the latest edition of building and other codes adopted by the City unless specifically exempted in this chapter. C. Existing Lot and Uses. An accessory dwelling unit shall be permitted if the existing lot and dwelling, or proposed lot and dwelling, meet the'following requirements: 1, The lot on which the accessory dwelling unitis proposed to be established shall contain one existing permanent single-family dwelling or the application for the accessory dwelling unit: shall be made concurrently with an application for a single-family dwelting on the same lot; 2 The lot on which the accessory dwelling unit is proposed to be established shall not contain any existing accessory living quarters, second dwelling units, granny flats, guest houses, servant"s quarters, or similar facilities, unless the proposal includes demolition or modification of such facilities so as to comply with the provisions of this section,-, 1 The zoning regulations for the lot allow for the development of a sin le-family dwelling or multifamily use; and 4. The existing lot is a minimum of five thousand (5,000) square feet; D, Facilities. The accessory dwelling unit shall have a separate entrance and shall contain kitchen and bathroom facilities separate firom those of the main dwelling unit. EUtility Services. The accessory dwelling unit may be metered separately from the main dwelling unit for as, electricity, COMMUnications, water and sewer services. F. Fire Sprinklers. Accessory dwelling units shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if they are not required for the primary residence. G. Size.The size of the accessory dwelling unit shall comply with the following requirements indicated in Table 17.100.040-1 TABLE 17,100.040®1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS Accessory Height Dwelling Unit Minimum Size Maximum Size Type 50% of main dwelling unit or Cannot exceed the height Attached 220 sq. ft. 1,200 sq. ft. of the primary structure Detached 350 sq. ft. 1,200 sq, ft, 16 feet Draft Ordinance® Page 3 of 7 E3 Pg50 H. Bedrooms. The accessory dwelling unit shall contain no more than two (2) bedrooms. 1. Separation. A detached accessory dwelling unit shall have a minimum separation of ten (1 0) feet between the main dwelling unit and the detached accessory dwelling unit. J. Lot Coverage. Accessory dwelling units shall conform to the lot coverage requirements for the zoning district in which it is located. K. Setbacks® Accessory dwelling units shall comply with the following standards: 1. Units located within the rear yard setback area shall maintain a minimum 54foot rear and side yard setback. 2. Units located outside of the rear yard setback area shall maintain the same setbacks as the primary structure. 3. Notwithstanding the above, no setback shall be required for an existing garage that is converted to an accessory dwelling unit or a portion of an accessory dwelling unit. L. Parking. Parking for accessory dwelling units shall be provided as follows, in addition to the parking required for the main dwelling unit: 1. Accessory dwelling units shall provide a minimum of one parking space, 2. If parking for the accessory dwelling unit is provided in a garage which also provides parking for the main dwelling unit® the provided space(s) shall be for the exclusive use of the accessory dwelling unit. The space(s) shall be separated from any garage spaces for the main dwelling unit by a wall or other permanent barrier and shall have a separate or independent garage door. 1 The accessory dwelling unit shall utilize the same vehicular access that serves the existing main dwelling unit, unless the accessory dwelling unit has access from a public alley contiguous to the lot or is located on a corner lot for which secondary access is permitted for parking outside the street side setback. A vehicular driveway that provides access to required parking shall have a minimum width of ten (10) feet, 4. When a required garage, carport, or covered parking structure for the main dwelling unit is converted or demolished in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit, the replacement spaces for the main dwelling unit may be located in any configuration on the same lot as the accessory dwelling unit, including, but not limited to, covered spaces, uncovered spaces, or tandem spaces in compliance with the requirements of this section. 5. On-site parking is not required for an Accessory Dwelling Unit in any of the following instances: i. The accessory dwelling unit is located within a one-half mile walking distance of a transit stop with service at peak commute time of 15-minutes or less; H. The accessory dwelling unit is located within a historic district; iii. The accessory dwelling unit is part of the existing primary residence or an existing accessory structure; Draft Ordinance ® Page 4 of 7 E3 p 5 iv, When on-street parking permis are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit; or v, Where there Is a car share station located within one block of the accessory dwelling unit, 17-100-050 Design Standards, All accessory dwelling units shall comply with the following design standards: A. Exterior stairs shall not be visible from any public fight-of-way, excluding alleys or traiis, B, The color, material, and texture of the roof shall be substantially the same as the main dwelling unit. C. The color, material, and texture of all building walls shall be substantially the same as the main dwelling unit. DThe accessory dwelling unit shal[ maintain the scale and appearance of a single-family dwelling. E. Permitted driveways and walkways shall occupy no more than fifty percent (50%) of the front yard area, in compliance with section 17.56.070. F When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure that is visible from any public right- of-way is converted or demolished in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit, the design shall incorporate features to match the scale® materials, textures, trim, and landscaping of the main dwelling unit. 17A00,060 Historic Buildings. A, An accessory dwelling unit proposed for any lot that includes a building listed in the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historic Places, or the City's local historic inventory shall conform to the reqtjirements for the historic structure. 13An accessory dwelling unit proposed for a property under a Mills Act Contract must comply with all Mills Act guidelines, including design conformance with the United States Secretary of the Interior Standards. 17.100X0 Ownership and Occupancy Requirements. A- Owner Occupancy Required. One of the residential dwellings on a lot on which the accessory dwelling unit is proposed to be established shall be occupied as the primary residence of the owner of the lot and shall not be rented or leased as long as the accessory dwelling unit exists. B. Rental Occupancy, The residential unitthat is not occupied by the owner of the property in conformance with this subsection may be rented for no less than 30 consecutive days at any time. Draft Ordinance — Page 5 of7 E3 Pg52 C. Sale of Accessory Dwellingits. Sale or ownership of an accessory dwelling unit separate from the mainvelli nit is prohibited. Deed Restrictions. Prior to issuance of a buildingpermit for an accessory dwelling nit, the property owner shall execute and record in the office of the County Recorder a covenant setting forth the following i i requirements, in a form and substance satisfactory to the Planninge a t and City Attorney's ice: 1, The accessory dwelling it shall not be sold or owned separatelyfrom the main dwelling unit, and the parcel upon whichthe unit is located shall not be subdivided in any manner that wouldauthorize such sale or ownership; 2. The accessory dwelling unit shall be a legal unit, and may be used as habitable space® only so long as either the main dwellingnit, ort e accessory dwelling unit, is occupied by the owner of record of the property; 3. Any rental of the accessory dwelling unit shall be fora period exceeding consecutivedays; and 4, The restrictions shall be binding upon any successor in ownershipof the property. 17.1 WHO ExistingNonconforming its® A. Accessory dwelling units, second dwelling units, granny flat or similar accessory structures at exist as of the effective date of this aper] that have previously been legally established may continue to operate as legal nonconforming accessory dwelling nits. Any accessory dwelling nit that exists as oft e effective date eft is section, and has net previously been legally established, is considered an unlawful use, unless the Planning Director determines that the unit meets the provisions eft is section. 17.100. 090 Conversionf Existing Spaces to AccessoryDwelling its® A. A proposed accessory dwelling unit that is contained entirely within the existing space of a single-family residence or existing accessory structure may be converted to a accessory dwelling nit through the issuance of a buildingpermit provided that the proposed unit has independent exterior access from the existing residence, and the side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire safety. proposed accessory dwelling nit approved pursuant to this section shall comply with section 17,100.070 oft is code, C. Conversion of the following structures shall not be approved pursuant tot is section, but may be approved pursuant tot e full requirements of this chapter: 1. Unenclosed accessory buildings or unenclosed accessory structures, such as patios, gazebos, breezeways, carports, o e coc eres, or similar structures. Animal enclosures o buildings used for the housing of animals. . ,accessory buildings or accessory structures that are less than 150 square feet in tea." Draft Ordinance ® Page 6 of 7 3 SECTION 5. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to b invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases„ or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 6. Neither the adoption of this ordinance nor the repeal of any other Ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect the prosecution for violations of ordinances, which violations were committed prier to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver of any penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof. SECTION 7, The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause it to be published in the manner required by lave. Draft ordinance—Page 7 of 7 MIA STAFF REPORT DATE; August 8e 201 TO: Chairman and Members of the Panning Commission Candyce Burnett, City Planner & INITIATED ® Jennifer s ® Associate Planner SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00605 [ F RANCHO CUCAMONGA a A request to amend Title7 of the Municipal Code to amend requirements and standards for the developmentHotels, This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality A ( A) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section15061(b)(3). is item will be forwarded to City Council for final action. Staff recommends the PlanningCommission continue r ) t to the August 22, 2018 Planning Commission ti Staff is requesting rain f this item to provideadditional time to finalize r s d changes to the Development Code for the sl t of new hotels wit in the City® e Iss E4—Pg 1 , P STAFF REPORT DATE: August 6, 2016 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM-® Candyce Burnett, City Planne INITIATED BY: Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 1 7- VAN DAELE , INC,A review of a proposed subdivision ofthree parcels with a combined area of 17.23 acres into three ( ) parcels and four( ) letter lots located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Clevelandvenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway (formerly referred to as The Vine); A, .021 ®102®04., Related files: Design .view 2017-00925 and Fire-Application DRC2017-00697. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (C ), the City certified an Environmental Impact Report( I )(SCH No. 2 1 410 ) on May 18, 2016 in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment 201 114$ Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment C01560 115. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGNVI C2 17- 5- VAN DAELE HOMES, INC, A request for site plan and architectural review of 296 units consisting of bungalows, townho e , and flats on multiple parcels with a combined area of 17.23 acres within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway (formerly referred to as The Vine); :021 -1 2-Q Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20147 and Pre-Application 1 7, Pursuant tote California Environmental Quality Act ( ), the City certified n Environmental Impact Report( I )(SCH No. 20150410 83)on May 18,2016 in connection with theCity's approval of General Plan Amendment C2 1 - 114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment 0201 - 115. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection it subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: E5-6Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION SUBTT20147 AND DR DRC2017-00925 ® VAN DAELEHOMES, INC August8, 2018 Page * Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20147 and DesignReview 17® 25 through the adoption of the attachedResolutions with Conditions of Approval, PROJECT SITE BACKGROUND: The project site is part of a propertyof 160 acres that was formerly even ed with the privately owned and operatedire Lakes Golf Course generallylocated in the center of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan (the"Specific Plan"). The Specific Plan has an overall area of 347 acres and is generally bound by 4th Street to the south, Milliken Avenue tote east, Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue tote west, and 8thtreat and the BNSF/Metrolink rail line to the north, The Specific Plan is bisected into south halves by 6thtreet, The golf course was closed in mid-2016 following the approval by the City Council of amendments t the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Development Code (related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, andevelo e t Code Amendment 2 115). These amendments were forte purpose of enabling the master developer, Lewis Management Cor ., to develop a new mixed use and transit-oriented project("Empire LakesiThe Resort") hereafter referred o as "the overall project". The overall project is intended to be developed in phases by various developers. The first phase will include all of the southern alf and a small portion of the northern half. REVIEWPROJECT An application to subdivide the first phase of the overall project was approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 2017 (Related files Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20073). The primary rose oft e subdivision was to allow the sale of parts of the overall project to other developers such as the applicant, ale Homes, Inc, Following the approval of this subdivision, e applicant prepared conceptual plans for the development of Parcels 4 through 15, The conceptual Ins were presented tote Planning Commissionduring a Pre-Application orks oheld on October 27, 2017 (Related file„, Pre-Application Review DRC2017-00697, Exhibit ). The Commission reviewed the proposal and provided comments (Exhibit J), The applicant for I submittedsubmMed the subject applications on November 28, 2017. SITE DESCRIPTION: The site has an area of 17.23 acres with a street frontage of about 310 feet along 6thtreat, it ill be bound on the west by the future, o -sot primary street ("The Resort Parkway”) oft e overall project. Following the construction of that street, the site will have a frontage along that street of 2,100 feet, The site is currently vacant. The majority of the improvements associated with the former olf course ave been removed andthe site has been ss" graded to prepare it for development. Currently, underground utility infrastructure is being installed beneath what ill eventually be the right-of-way for The Resort Parkway. The existing land ses on, and General Plan land use a o lilln designations for, the project site and the surrounding pro e r s (relative to theabove-noted parcels) are as follows: ......... ......................... . ............ .............. .... s l .,. ................................................................................................ Site r .... .. 2........................1t' ix s . ix. . . seeNorth no half f Vacant { Mixed Use Mixed Use ...(Planning Cin ,...Area .... ..t ............... ) far er frwvate golf co rse E5-6Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF 113t:EPORT SUBTT20147 AND DR DR 2017-00925 - VAN DAELE HOMES, INC August8, 2018 Page 3 o�uth —Vacant' ' Mixed Use Mixed Use 9 rea I ...............................................................�F!ariDinA )2 ast Aii��)artment Cori deo Ned Use i Mixed Use (Planning Areas 6 an est Vacant' Mixed hallf of Use Mixed ULse i A )2 Il art oil the south e c ig, P � i,ar)i........... . ............... .......... ANALYSIS: e n�er rel. e I�inRe�vlew Q�RC20�18-009�25: The applicant proposes a residential project that follows the intent of Empire Lakes/The Resort as described in the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan is divided into twenty-four (24) "Placetypes". Eleven (11) Placetypes are located south of 6th Street. The land use characteristics and density of each Placetype are defined by six (6) different designations. The location of the project site is generally within Placetypes S-21 (Village Neighborhood (VN)) and S-22 (Core Living (Ci It is also partially within the Mixed- Use Overlay. The project consists of 296 single-family residential units as follows: 99 bungalows, 80 townhomes (or "RowTown"), and 117 stacked fiats. The floor area of each unit type will be between 1,464-1,536 square feet (bungalow), 1,501-1,853 square feet (townhome), and 1,2136-1,798 square feet(stack flats). All of the residental units are for sale. Non-residential uses are not proposed within this project. The overall density of the project will be about 18.75 unitslacre (296/15.79 acres). The area for the streets was not counted toward the density therefore, only 15.79 acres of land was used for density calculation purposes, As the project site is within two separate Placetypes, it is subject to the density requirements of those Placetypes. The required density ranges for development within Placetypes S-21 (Village Neighborhood (VN)) and 5-22 (Core Living (CL)) are 16-28 du/acre and 18-35 dulacre per Figure 7.6 of the Specific Plan, The Specific Plan permits various different architectural themes throughout Empire Lakes/The Resort. The applicant has elected to use "Spanish", "Contemporary", and "Heritage" themes for the bungalows, stack flats, and townhomes, respectively. The number of floors (stories), interpretations of the themes, and floor plans are as follows: Building Number of i _umber Architectur I Number of Number of ly2e Eutldir, s of Stories Theme Inter retations Floor Plans _!B�alow 993 ,q�sh 2 3 Townhome Lex 7 3 2 4 5__ lex 5 3 Heritage 2 J + 2 reverse - lex 1 3 2 3 + 2 reverse 7- lex 3 3 2 - 3 Stack Flat 13 3 Contemporary 24 5 1 Plan 1 is a'carriage unit",2 three floors when including the 31 floor option for Ran 3;'not including the 3lexr option for Plan 3, The bungalow residences will be detached, i.e. will not share a building wall with an adjacent residence, similar to a standard two story single-family residence. Unique amongst the other units and building types will be Plan 1 of the bungalows. Excluding the entryway and porch, this unit will be a one floor residence located above a set of garages. The townhome residences will be attached in a row house arrangement consisting of between four (4) to E5—li PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT20147 AND DR DRC2017-00925 - VAN DAELE HOMES, INC August 8, 2018 Page 4 seven (7)two- or three-story units. The stacked flats will be single-floor residences arranged vertically above one another similar to a multi-story apartment. Each of the stacked flat buildings will have a single entrance with a lobby. Access to all individual units within these buildings will be through interior hallways. Access to the second and third floors will be via shared elevators and interior stairways. The units within the other two building types will have direct, individual entrances. her siden is units are generally plotted together according to their typology. The bungalows will be clustered together in 33 sets with 3 units each and located generally along the east side of the project site. The townhomes will be grouped in 16 buildings with between 4 to 7 units each. They will be located generally along the west side of the project near The Resort Parkway and, therefore, will be the dominant building type along The Resort Parkway. The front elevation of most of the buildings along this street will face The Resort Parkway, The stacked flats will be grouped in 13 buildings with 9 units each. These buildings will be located at the north side of the project site in a reverse 'U shaped pattern around one ofthe recreationallcomm unity facilities that will be constructed for overall project. Consistent with the requirements oft e Specific Plan, the project will be an"open community". All streets within the interior of the project will be private, i.e, maintained by a homeowner's association. However, these streets will be open to the public (non-residents of the project). Primary vehicular access into the project will be private street connections to The Resort Parkway at various locations® As the presence of gates and fences will be minimal, external access by pedestrians, bicyclists, etc. generally will be available at a variety of locations. Vehicular and non-vehicular movement throughout the site will not be restricted by gates or fences except, for example, where it is required by Building Code or desired to control access into private spaces. Where buildings are adjacent to The Resort Parkway or one of the several private, interior streets, pedestrian access tote will be generally direct. Numerous courtyards are a prominent feature of the project. A dog park (645 square feet)an outdoor play area (1,240 square feet), an "Al Fresco" dining area (404 square feet), a plaza area (1,880 square feet), an open to area (9,800 square feet) and a rose garden (1,295 square feet) are all proposed within the project. Residents of building types will have direct access to these open space amenities. The minimum area for private open space(150 square feet) has also been exceeded with each unit having an average of 247 square feet of private open space. There also will be pedestrian pathways that will provide not only internal connectivity, but connectivity with the other parts ofthe overall project. All buildings/unit types will have direct access to enclosed garages. With the exception of Plans 2 and 3 of the bungalow building type, all garages are attached to the building/unit they serve. The garages for Plans 2 and 3 will be part ofthe same building for Plan 1. The bungalows will have private yard areas enclosed by walls 6 feet in height for privacy and security. Similarly, both the bungalows and the townhomes will have patio areas enclosed by 42-inch high walls. Otherwise, no significant walls/fences will be constructed with this project. There is an existing wrought it fence along the property line that separates the overall project site and the apartment complex to the east. The required density forte project within Plac etypes S-21 (Village Neighborhood (VN)) and S-22 (Core Living (CQ) is 16-28 du/acre and 18-3ulacre respectively. Separately, the E5-6Pg4 PLANNiNG COMMISS110N STAFF REPORT SU TT20147 AND IDR 1 2 17-00925 - VAN DAELE HOMES, INC August 8, 201 Page 5 projects in the individual al p iac typ s dna not meet the rrniirnpmuuirn density required p•ow ev r, together as an overall prrap cto the dwellilling units per acre equate to 't 6.'75 units which is albove the minimum for both pp c types. This is ailowed per Section 7.3.2--- Placetype Descriptions (page 7-18) which states that staff can maintain in flexi ilityr for responding to changing community meads and market conditions over the build-out, intensity" may be transferred between parcefs consistent mrlth the 1 ° p intensit r provided the minimum required units are achieved. Where density transfers between p rce/s, in no case shall development emceed the net development total (residential and room-residential) established by Thele '7.'1.° PAI Development Program. & 'Tentative IP ircepMap SUBTFT20147: The proposed project also inciud s the subdivision of ihe projj E suture into hares ( ) Iparcels of 5.25 acres, 3,76 acres, and 5,75 aures (Dots 1, 2„ and r sp ctaV Oy) and four (4) "Il tt r" pots (Lots "A" through "D")4 The letter pots will be for an interior street (Lot "A"), open sp c s/comirrnoiri areas (gots "B" through "D"). Vous appiicant proposes this subdivision to fadiitate maintenance nan r sponsplbup'atu s, financing, etc. which otherwise is right be difficult to accomplish if the site remained sungle pane,. C. Parkin ; IP r T IN '7.6 (Parkin Standards) rad the Specific Piano residential d veiopment of 0 unitslacre or less shall provide parking consistent with the requirements described in T lbi 1T.64.050-1 of the Deveiopment Code, The parking requirements for the project are Ib s d on the number of bedrooms pier unit as follows: s: BASE HOUSE BEEP'RCIGrA COJrP AVAiL BED COUNT wl VJXA OPTION'x Resident Guest Total Resident Gtmst ToW Spaces Spares Spa.-e& Spares spares 5paces Units Bed Count Requirpd Rerqukred Raqu red Bid Count &degukred Required Required SM.Pn aic Pk.AN 1 2 2 41.33 7o'f`5.1 5 3 2 0,3;3 76.89 eurgalrav^.r 1PUm,42 ;33 4 2.5 41.:33 !73,39 4 2.5 41,3'1 93.39 Bun,alov's PLAN 33 ___ 3 2 41.33 76.89 4 41,33 9:3.33 RS}I°J'No1 rn PLAN1;k. 21 3 Z x.,3345.93 ----7 2.5 0,33 53.4i__w &tcvuT0wn Pk N12 _ 23 3 _ 6.3:3 mm 53.59 3 RctvTawn PLANk3 27 3 �._ Pz.33 6291 4 2.5 mmmC1.33 76,41 a,vTo wrn PIAN 4 9 24 2.5 0.33 25 4'7 � mm2.5 01.33 R4111 Hat. FL4N11 2S 2. 4'3.33 $825 2 F 41.33Mats PLAN 1 13 7 2 0,33 mm:?47.9m 2 ___2___ 0.33PL4t'13 25 2 4333 "a�,25 � 2 mMmq.33Mars IP$AR14 26 _ 47.33 Flats PPAN 5 2F5 3 2 41,3:3 X5.2. µ 2 C 0,31 62 a.USTOTAL 296 _710.68 _�_________-. 151.18 RASE HOUSE BEDR.V,.1c11v1 COUNT _ Gtl 4P rP 4�41NJC vt BJ�A�S�YxLa�YPa PROPOSED PRkWI`+YG PROPOSED PARKaN G Garage Spaces 592 Garage Spaces 592 Parking Stalls 143Parking Stalls 1.43 Subtol:A 535 5ubtokal 7:35 Vkne Street 21. Vme SOeek 21 tdtak Park,no 756 Total Parking r56 ParkingSurplui 4.5.32 Parking Surplus 4.82 The above table shows the two sets of parking calculaflons. The first applies to a "base" (project where r none of the homebuyers. choose the option of an added bedroom (ut available, see higl4ghted plan types in the t (kap ). The second applies to a "option i" project where, if time option is avaiiable, appIhomelitaury rs choose an added b drC oro. These scenarios uppustr t E5-6Pg5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT20147 AND DR 2017- 925 ® fir DAELE HOMES, INC August 8, 2018 Page 6 the minimum (base) and maximum (optional) parking demands, respectively, for the project. If all units utilized the maximum square footage options, the project would still have a surplus of 4 parking spaces. Therefore, the amount of parking provided within the project will comply with the Development Code. Most of the parking that has been provided to meet the parking requirements for the project will be in enclosed garages. The remainder will be on-street parking (The Resort Parkway and interior streets) and in unenclosed parking stalls. Per Section 7.3.5 — Parking Requirements of the Specific Plan, all on-site and on-street parking for a specific project can be credited towards the parking requirement provided that this solution is validated by a parking analysis. This analysis was provided in a technical analysis memorandum prepared by the applicant's environmental consultants (Exhibit Q. DDesign Review Committee: The proposed project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Macias, Oaxaca, and Granger) on July 3, 2018 (Exhibit K). Staff recommended a set of design revisions in the comments report prepared forte meeting. These revisions consisted of adding the work, iron work and "s" the roof tote Spanish style plan types. In response to this recommendation, thea lie nt brought revised elevations for these plan type tote meeting. The Committee was satisfied with the changes and additions to the elevations and forwarded the project to the Planning Commission for review. E. Technical Review Committee: The proposed project was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee on July 3® 2 1 taff discussed the conditions of approval for the project and the applicant accepted the conditions of approval. The Technical Review Committee recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission. F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant tote California Environmental Quality Act ("CECIA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City certified an Environmental Impact Report(EIR) on May 18, 2016 (SCH No. 2015041083) in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC215. Pursuant to CEQA, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless- (I) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental Impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR is required, the applicant's environmental consultant, so ase prepared an Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum (Exhibit L) dated June 28, 2018. Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope ofthe approved overall project and analysis included in the Final EIR identified above and no additional environmental review is required in connection with the it ®s consideration of Tentative Tract Map 20147 and Design Review DRC2017-00925. Substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred is would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated int previous EIR. The previous E5-6Pg6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT20147 AND DR DRC2017-00925 - ilk DAELE HOMES, INC August 8, 2018 Page 7 environmental review analyzed the effects of the proposed project. to further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed subdivision and construction of bungalows, townhomes and stacked flats is consistent with the intent of the overall project (Empire LakesfThe Resort) and will contribute to achieving the fiscal benefits that were discussed in the to Report for the associated amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Development Code that were approved by the City Council in May/June 2016. The annual revenue generated from, for example, property tax, sales tax, fees, and assessments, and the costs for government services including, for example, police, animal care, community development, public works, and other general government functions were analyzed in a fiscal impact analysis prepared in March 2016. Per that Staff Report, the annual revenues/costs inthe calculations inthe analysis were based on the overall project when it was fully constructed and completed. The benefits include the project's contribution to Park District 85 (PD85), Landscape Maintenance District 1 (L 1), and Street Lighting District 1 (SLD1). These benefits would not occur without implementation of the project. hiss bsta tial, additional revenue from the proposed project would reduce the need for General Fund contributions to these assessment districts. Other economic benefits were expected to accrue as a result of the overall project. The EIR certified for the Project identifies the underserved and unmet housing needs in the region. The availability of new housing opportunity allows businesses to grow by providing additional housing for new and existing workers. Providing these housing opportunities in close proximity tothe City®s business and industrial core will facilitate an environment where individuals who or in the community will also reside in it and support existing businesses. Due to the transit- and pedestrian-oriented approach of the project, environmental costs are lowered and a healthier environment is created. Furthermore, higher value industrial businesses are increasingly relying on being near a supply of housing for potential employees when determining new locations for their operations. The overall project represents an opportunity to provide the needed housing in rental and price ranges that are affordable to early career workers. Also, an option is created for older residents looking to "downsize" and select a location which requires less driving to reach services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The proposed project will ensure that the overall project (Empire Lakes/The Resort), when completed, will contribute tote realization of several City Council goals. The General Plan discusses several land use policies including 1)planning for vibrant, pedestrian- friendly mixed use and high density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes; 2) implementing land use patterns and policies that incorporate smart growth practices, E5-6Pg7 PLANNING i 1 17e , INC August , 2018 Page 8 including pl higher densities neartransit centers and alongtransit corridors; and 3) supporting using opportunities for workers of all income ranges. The City Council has two goals, Goals A24 and A25 that arerelevant to the Project. The objective f Goal A24 is "to address 1} mixed use, high density, transit oriented development )e and 2) underperforming or underutilized areas." The objectivef Goal A25 is"review vi City's zoning districts and evaluate/investi gate creatingv e y districts or specific pla s" that ill create districtsin r to revitalize underperforming or underutilizedareas. This item was advertised as a public hearing withregular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the propertys posted, andnotices were mailedto all property owners within of radius of the project site. No comments have been received in response to thesetii ti s. EXHIBITS: Exhibit iinit a Exhibit B Aerial Map Exhibit C Conceptual av nt Plan (excerpt r the Empire Lakes Specificla Exhibit ® Tentative T7 t Map SUBTT20147 Exhibit its Plan Exhibit Igor Plans Exhibit GElevations Exhibit n s la Exhibit 1 6Staff Report for Pre-Application Review DRC2017-00697 (not including Exhiits) Exhibit ePre-Application Revi r shop Minutes Exhibit K Dsin Review Committeeti a and Comments Exhibit L Evi n t l Technical Analysis Memorandum Draft s luti o of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20147 Draft Resolution of Approvalfor Design Review1 ® CB.MS/ss E5-6Pg8 Vicinity Map Tentative Tract Design Review 1 ' w t ' f mrn 1 I Of�iiii p wr w l rime f�kl,4ira,mH,� �n a1V1a,lti�N1y✓m�� ,a�„��,,,nfrhlJ�Ni� irar�a „�,l�y,,�,��,�4�, o m v�OY'�»�,gr"r'�'�IN9ivb�imm��i ;,° � � ,,,•,,,,� 9th St � G ,.. Base Lire d' � ,...�,., y. .,e. _. �,._ ,,.._._ . ... _ "ase Lune, r` If LI r'L w� U 1 Foothill �. J["-- FoothfII v � �... res i Arrow w�F.o r»nr Jersey Liu I9y' y tl�5 w•. � A�.o �� „_, , t I'1 t. � off. o. ,.�.� , . ,� „m. _ L�J�1 W sc 4tht - W� .w _. ..._.. Citify Hall Proje bite-] Exm IBIE5 6P9 m Tentative Tract M ap SUBTT20147 and Design Review DRC2017-00925 XAA M 3: 91--mam-,AM 03 t. ti I M, ..........- mwqq 34 gm, MONAA-1- MP N1 trr)III-fk ad6"�E7(e }arir ifIaJ L II Nlo k R Park TM `, IMPAMPIM, "p 11117 %��% / wdr�G�� rcl,� Igrtll"14:I'14 P `U C aflt) ICj's my RV AC �o- dreul Neu 1 ,�Op ti a6 rum; el(w� Mo N-,. y r 1 , CL - r�„ 1. �' N� °a X00 TO r,ra✓r�� r 9��)m�� dui ftp F Ar G " i w,1 add N Af, u 70 N6h �N1,A �6 NL N'O fI ;✓ ) North �� h, ��....:.... .... Urban flan A119411%,NII 201,17 / " '1 gyp ' v r��wsHw s 2 , South S,14 Via). i � RMC O!,u',F b:a sa ac, I Qj vtr 4f r d ✓ SIN/ I u 1 ,f" r•" Y`• 1iMpl r d � N I V ( fY.➢1 hrxvow I' t rc airy 114.ii,)p b h god [1N on,,Ivudqf'6} i ibv)1VN Re/ My 'm(I,I C:) MLOt)v,d,If Yagar j rd trrrl), )SLI qc it i E s: a 4..,a j � Ivry{) �5 �,� "�, A, II. � � as r�'4 I� iIPY;V�,t///N a� � � ,w, 5--6Pgl1 %1AP mum"m TENTATIVE TRACT NO.20147 L rn 3=W zj .......... W SEE HKwo'm KmV A Y 7" JHKM�T UNY01 m X Bungaiows: Spanish Elevatioq A ca Townhutwes: Hervage V Ele�acion A e" on B 5mcked Flan: Concempo"ry AT Elevation A Elevation B V A V % m L I rt uj —21 24 1 4-11-1 L VA I A �7 0 1 Q- 1 71 1 -7 107 Bassenian Lagom SITE PLAN ARCHITECTURAL THEMES T H E R E S 0 R T VAN CME L E m PLAN I ; LLVABlEL•mssa IT PRIVATE O PEN SPACE 163 SO mn -i - - - I sa' r _ 'S c � s•-0• � WRAGE '' 1 CAIII,GE y I f.3wF _ - ENTRY POPQ1 _ _ I PATIO -- - PATIO b , •q,t — m � qj.DINING " _ cDEwr �RDom � KITaEN i l `,• KITCHEN TYPICAL GARAGE SECTION __ r IMwr¢ensro�wa..o.tura ..._ HA I 1^+ r' um, ENTRYs t` I � I , OYf.BAA ;ENTRY �, DIN f A BEDROOMin' I� lBFD'OOM�.r •+ E—\ PAT� 4ATIC pw 2e v �a.o I I 20•-9' el PLAN 3 PLAN 2 UVMLE:1.536 SO.rr. LIVABLE 1.53 So rT. ",V,TE5PA[E._53�.Sp„FT_ 7-_ _�-�. —I. PRVATE 6PENISPACE. 6N SC•.rT - I I - — I -I_ i I 1 a 1 ORC2017-Ra92s Sb RT Tn 20177 SHEET NO BUNGALOWS A 1 . 2 8assenian i Ca ani g Compos)Le Plan First Flvor r�"Me MLt•RIMM.-E-Ift3 �•�' — THE RESORT - BUNGALOWS 0I09IB '' ,� a:Yr.%,F;'..H,,,. RPn.lo Cucamon8a. CA ti;:z,Y 5]1.1 7 1 2 6 { YAN OAELE FANATEOPENSPAS 1635Q.FT. OPT..BONUS I prm MAS"A BEDROOM -X�� i c--7F9 0! 177RE 7 OPT.BX3w/SHOWER BEDROOM]•""n- rl Llj -.ME 0=1 KBATH2 H BATH r 7�ol ir DS, L OPT.MASTER SUITE m Lrl CA BA.2 PDk- CWT�RONLIS LIT! 4 if M BAT" :tAU OPT.3RD FLOOR BONUS wl PDR MEATH �.WM2 Al 01, FpaN 3 PLAN 2 UVABLE.i.536Sq.Fr. UvABUE 031 SO FT PW&TESPACE!S"SQ Fr PIWATEOPEN SPACE w SQ FT OPT.STAIRS TO 3RD FLOOR DRC2917-0 o923 SUBTTuIC 147 SHEET NO ails — Bassenian'LagBUNG A L O W S Al 3 _ p.511. P1.4 Second Fl— THE RESORT - BUNGALOWS ilio hio C.C—nga. CA 7126 FDR �R�M2 • uDxkoam RMROOM _741 tj OWING J 9&2DN�IM . �I IIlh 1ST "Ni 1 4w N 6-�2 L G C) OPT.MASTER SUITE m --------- ------ TYPICAL GARAGE SECTIOr-4 125 SQ.FEET OF STORAGE AWvEcAm LAI GAMGE' GAIAIE A PLAN r 1.464 SQ.Fr, 3 SEDROOKS 725 BATHS 2-CAP,GARAGE FLOOR AREA TABLE IST FLOOR 78 SQ FT. 2ND FLOOR .370 SQ Fr, TOTAL :,64 SQ.FT. 2-CAR GARAGE 45S SQ.Fr. DECK 136 SO.Fr, PORCH 36 SQ-FT. ORC20 1 7.00925 SUBTT020 147 SHEET Na Bassenian I Lagoni PLAN I A 1 .4 THE RESORT BUNGALOWS 01 09 18 521-17126W�DAELC 'I BMrMOS47 7rwn — �7 �DINING j. GREAT .- 1 'Y tmr� i ptBEonoon !�' r---T rzGso+Enlj- ' • � 1 LAU _ ENTRY � I � M BATH {_• 1.'. pT^ 1. j I poIelll �4 BEO0.00H xf 1 BEDRDOH7 O i PLAN 2 1,534 SQ.FT. 4 BEDROOMS!3 BAT345 2•CAR GARAGE FLOOR AREA TABLE IST FLOOR 763 SQ.FT. 2ND FLOOR771 SQ.FT. TOTAL 1,534 SQ.FT. bn m..•.,m•.n..,....n..,= DRC2017-00925 SUBITO20147 SHEET NO BassenianiLagoni PLAN 2 A1 .7 I[SXRlCIXRf•IIRXAILG•INlINipNI �I•—� THE RESORT - BUNGALOWS 01,09.16 3 1° R-Xncho CoeGm onyx, CA -, - 521.17126 YAN DAELE Vr-9" !ma .0 �r"AJT m Ln KaChk� BATH coRe OPT "py IFN! .1 OPT.BECROOM4 Lill 114 `I 1�l I PLAN 3 ;536 SQ.Fr. 3 BEOROOMSI 3 BATHS I DEN I OPT.BONUS ,2-CAR GARAGE FLOOR AREA TABLE IST FLOOR 787 SQ.Fr. 2ND FLOOR 749 SO.FT. TOTAL 1.536:Q.FT. 0". RD FLOOR 330 SQ:FT. DRC2017-00535 SU-8TT-UZ0147 SHEET ND Bassenian I LagGni PLAN 3 A I . 10 THE RESORT BUNGALOWS Cv--ng.. CA tjDAELE rn ui OPT BONUS 07 ONUS aM I imL=- sse OPT.DA 3 wl SHOWER OPT.3RD FLOOR BONUS wl PDR OPT.STAIRS TO 3RD FLOOR DRC7017-0092S 411677420117 SHEET NO Bassenian I Lagoni PLAN 3 A I THE RESORT - BUNGALOWS a 1.09 44 CA - VAN DAELE -•--- a� i T., _Y :miff t �: 141 7� C+";j', T1, -y i::•:_ �„u IN rl SECOND FLOOR Unit 4 Unit 3X Unit 2 Unit I m u�1 ch I I eer za• rQ j \lL Gs_ '}�� I?s9trll i= 'f-g. JII r l�- I I I : .. ` I TY CALGARAGESe7DM_ • `(r5 zssc Hero:nou;ct.eosa e:ks I 12 i I - r.ab 4I I I' 4-i riyp FIRST FLOOR I Unit 4 Unit 3X Unit 2 Unit 1 '�� µ..'uairnu hP II C2 d�l 7-n0925. ..�.*c oro,vsce u,r 4.:..,tonuv.rs zs.sr w.w.sFo4o,v,� uvr wn.,eue,vs :�sa. SUBTT1170347 SHEET NO Bassenian I Lag ani- 4- P L E X �A2. 2_ Build,nE Composite � noh:,ic,�n•nta�rea•inum�s �--I- THE RESORT - TOWNHOMES 0809ra Ca. L�ZVU St' VAN DAELE i r „t j IS ,�12 rLly ,il 4- PLEX ROOF PLAN m Il 1 F. —lll I!E r!t 'i '��I � oll •- ,(� a°: t�k• 1I` Mt _ I .ISI kV 1 X Ii _ t�'' ' �1+ F \ THIRD FLOOR Unit 4 Unit 3X Unit 2 Unit I .oan o_R C2D1 7-00925 s UBTTI,20147 SHEET NO Bassenian 1 La ani 4- P L E X L—L2 3 j un�nau�•.utntl•tenuea B,141nj Cumpntlte •��—I+-�-- THE RESORT - TOWNHOMES 41.091s 521.17125 VAN DAELE 0 I Ip ``, t�� - m lt�r '! t�4' �'",.� .__s I;. �-J-i,, O d , T3 L JIL- SECOND FLOOR Unit IR Unit 2R unit 3x Unit2 Unit I m (.n NJ Nj A TYPICAL GARAGE SECTZCN it ILI jj"— 01nom„ -.4m ? FIRST FLOOR Unit IR Unit 2R Unit 3X Unit 2 Unit I-ACC [Dmt2-017-00-9251 S75 B T-Ff)20147 1 _SHEET NO Bassenian 1 La ani S - P L E X A 2 . 6 uns Buddtng C..p.six, THE RESORT TOWNHOMES 0l 09 ]a 1w R—ho cu'....g.. r.. 521.17125 VAN 13AELE --------------- -- --------- -- ars rn --- - -- ---- 17 - ------ --- - 5 PLr=X ROOF PLAN M Ln 7 in, 71 w & is JJk --j THIRD FLOOR Unit.IR Unit 2R Unit 3X Unit 2 �5WE-16,17-oo5251 �SVBTTtt20i 47 SHEET No 5 P L E X --A-2. 7 Bassenian La ani Building Composite THE RESORT TOWNHOMES ol'o9le C.--Zil, C- A/ VAN DAELE C31 I KIT.T1 SECOND FLOOR Unit 4X Unit 3AR Unit 3XR Unit 3A Unit 3X Unit 4XR m Lrl L -- ------ -- ------ -- 4 r 3 - --- ----- ----- ---—--------------- ----------------- ——--------------- - —---------—------ -—---------------- --—---------------- F7 AIJ t ---TL TYMCALG��G�S TION G) "F211- FIRST FLOOR Unit 4X Unit 3AP Unit 3XR Unit 3A Unit 3X Unit 4XFk D RC201 7-009L, wrtle SUBT7H70147 SHEET140 BasseiflanlL a 1 6 - P L E X A 2 . 10 ,,$ding Composite THE RESORT - TOWNHOMESal 04-iff C.....nl.. C.. 521AY12S VAN DAELE ----_---------------------- J ----------- - -------------- — all aST I1 7x 111 -.---^---------------- --- r ----------- ^! r --=--=------ 5 - PLEX ROOF PLAN m ul ulX" Pt, "M:alint Hid 73 INK,ffi-1-11 --I L THIRD FLOOR Unit 4X Unit 3AK Unit 3XR Unit 3A Unic 3x Unit 4XR DTE2017.-D0925 SUBTT020147 SHEET NO Bassenian I La ani 6- P L E.,Idi.9 C.x p..itc THE RESORT TOWNHOMES 01.0918 Ft-nch. C...—nd., C.. 521,17125 VAN DAELE IL it'ln 'it A; �-A IT LUT SECOND FLOOR Unit I P Unit 2R Unit 3XR Unit 3B Unit 3x Unit 2 Unit L m t.n La ----------------- � ';�1 I rurnf.,1 a 1` r�'� r' 1 ;wx"i`, , rr r3..,� 1' II rc_w.eE`� ly \J.� '1� ' r ' NJ L7 :1 IN 7`- -5 . — �t�vti _r ,4 � it i F �i� � � I I4Jr TYPICAL GARAGE SECTION cau R�P MI. .1. L FIRST FLOOR Unit-IR Unit 2R Unit-3xR Unit 3B Unit 3X Unit 2 Unit I ..... uaan rSRLCO2,0T1 7.0 D 9 2 S, #20147 SHEET NO Bassenian 7- P L E X A2. 14 Lagani THE RESORT TOWNHOMES o$ G9 III Ca. 52 1.17 125 VAN DAELE ---------------- ------------ ., I: - --- - - - - ----- -- --- �, ,D I 4.11 7 - PLEX ROOF PLAN m Ln t m _ � * -' �� 4.4 THIRD FLOOR Unit 2R Unit 3XR Unit 36 Unit 3X Unit 2 Unit I ORC1017.00925� SURTTf120197 SHEET NO Bassenian I Lagam 7- P L E X a 9 Balldlaj C—pullte ,I:Int[Iill•lUUSSI•Ilna10 •^�—E�+-- THE RESORT - TOWN HOMES ol.o9.le VAN DAELE --------'---=-------- ------------ --------- ------------------ - - .GARAGE ' Gnl1AGE� f GMJIGE, +' lGaW{GE 1 11 'GAAAGEI f '" 1 I�• n� 11 �m 1 I � I 1 �tt H1ZIP Hil1 I i Ili: 11 — M C7 _ Vit' u i; i J 4 "O s r7r ! f I� e• uff4s er ' ELrVAraRLID Fi I NIN�G `, 8 LOBBY 00 I I GARAo E Plan 2] satsiu � � niraTEmmr v.ct:.Inu. DRC201 T-009151 r 5 p9TTB 20117' SHEET NO Bassenian I La ani BUILDING 'A' 9- P L E X A 3 3 ' Lagani Floor C--ontemporary - Scyie 'A' Elevation I---—-- I:IIIItII[lrur%Ilf•tt1F1f1[S 4n•'-- -�• THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS 01 0918 Rancho Cucamon;a, GA. rr±x S21.1710a rD VAN DA Plan 41 JPlan 11 W WEUIJlr V, WDM!tnia rur,.n eartrvsr�:war. nvvn one.caret:rs sT. ----- d [py { �i� o[KE I I - II r, C Uer I T IIt wSQrr I ' II M45TFll l(1 I �'r MASTE0. I I +7, LJ- 8WROOH / a ISI T-I I IN.N BED] M2 �}= 1 I �' ��a1 111/ff—I 0.- ---• MsTEA. 1 yRxOreE M �' y E .r I,ow I 1 j r I Ln rT ELEVATORNJ k,- ILQ �_� � ,s " A40RDDH1 r - - - M TERLL I!r', _ N •.I. I, r d� �I :�o� ' I T t � `BATH`511 ✓ I -��.-. � ;_ _�. I- I mr 1�M4• �e - �T H OPEN TO 1 MOW f j MA TEA I_ - e-•� i 14. I,S•^/JL i_ ....lV K� �7� �.:�1_•1 I eED RDO iMJISTE '1 AWR06M] [ rL ,J1^1�'Fp g _ r j�' cETF �} S?G7.Wwl le -f LPWn Sj LLL 111 Plan 31 seareu vexra� uvslE:I.nl IF aau 13mia. nw,n orsNv.er na se. nw°vaTtan,au+a:mTr, �DiA� TC2017 04925] it 28147 i SHEET NO i Bassenian La ani B C1 1 L D I N G 'A' 9 - P L E X A3 . 4 Lagani Floor_-Contemporary . Seyle •A• EleaElan aetuls¢luee•rueaeAE•IKuelErs •ua--R� THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS OI.o91e Rancho Cucamonja, CA /u\ VAN DAELE i I P IRn 4J Plan I; ��n fA aan aA ' I,Maf. r1[YAn OIFN YAR:U Sf, rIJVAIF OI£NUACf ]S[f 6EI%K � eEoar [a 31—4 {l`Imcu +'— Y�1 rus[vt SER # aEohaOn21VI BEDROOM A aFD:1OOM I+ E j--� �l.s�.' iaa.ie• r� L r , f �_ 101 AR GREAT, AK Room BEOKOOMS41 1 r sant r rya..,4- t, -=� RY Ln I ..S uu/�S.Y♦ �E[EYATOR -1 Jt K94 CD STR�KMASTER 8m0.00M2 BATH STORAGE I. OVEriTO � ��• I 1 -ITER' I•– . {(I 19EORooM1 u!r� Fo11..19;t' a l' €- � ! — ----- & t -r_.�—' _.I—} --�i 1irl,'�1� s•.:1• �I I_usdrt !Plan SJ 'LKiii 31 a Bair cA t—T. rl ar lam sr rlrvAIEUA[a:ASPf ANAn O!'ENSAACF_rn lf. DRC201].80925 SU 87Ta 10 1,2 _SHEET NO BUILDING 'A' 9-PLEX A3 .5 ' BasseniaRlLagoni Third Fl-- Can[c mpora ry - 5[yle 'A' El—ri.n aa:elAFf cull•IlalYlkl•IXlialllt THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS 01091e Ranche CucamoR;a• CA 521.17108 VAN OAELE 116-.S 1r • ------ -----------'- __ ___ - ___ --------- ------ °--- --- - EI v- GAMGE1. i GARAGE iGARAGE Z 1GMACE / 5 �GAMGEI r i i m.Ku. 1 + ro•vrr \ f �` 1 1 � mvn• � � !lei.ox• l i I — s'.o• I r.a r la-r S m t. 1 I T .W .'- - --_ t K�� ;�•� r r our i 'ELEVATOR L�1 I T !A IMG F LI �r LOBBY — � GAa,tGE i wMGE` I sj 1`' r MASTER - .1 lo• I — L BATH - J GA - H1 -! GE M2 :urteA I wuxx:l.n.sr. oaczB l�_Bova.s� iu�TTuiu1+7. SHEET No BUILDING 'AX' 9- PLEX L__A3 . 12 Sassenian?Lagoni First Floor— Contemporary - Style 'A• Elevation •:val�r.0•rusmxa•mlarass 4T��—I�-�• THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS 01.09 Is, Rancho Cncamonsa, CA VAN DAELE (Plan 41 Plan IJ fRNAI[6h]1SrK[ Mil, —?7 ZL fff E" lip lm WROOM, Tj ROOM V M jx--r. aATH All IF RY xrzctuty -3? m t --T u I 'MATO IMR r LIM Lu T, EN 71 I MASTER- Y' Flk r OATH GRV 7A,1, STORAGE i V"7. 1 _ ;11.1! -- �_ {`Il -"-'�._-_ t f. jj ", r�l II\/\//I J BA OPEN TO SaawCa- Y_ !=TER ED 14 BEDROOM 2 =.n. `;au' ri ° i 1=1K )ErK W 4—IT-- 51 IP[an-31 - 1R1. SnAlIa1 Vit 111 i,tq sr -FORqO!7-0-09251 •SUSTTX20147 s rET MO BUILDING 'AX 9- PLEX A 3 . 13 Bassenim I La goni Second Floor- Contemporary Style 'A' Eleviti— ,.[rftC% P1.4101106-111[.4111 THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS al 09 ,g Rancho Cucamonga, CA 521.17 108 VAN DAELE lPlan 4] IPlan.!I wNr7.ram 5.l. w I.ITliF. flf+�,[OlR1MK3:uss, rwM+,F PRN S*K1. jI f BEnA00M3 .v �AiN¢I 1 soR I 1 ,l�l STFR f 1.` } 'l. I MASTER .�� &EOROOM .I .b�.a� LI OCI L— ` ,1 I. is I — ri 7� • j� FL-BEAT _��ly� S7.= - 7-- � P�ln- \:-BEDRDO j _ _ \ATTi1ERN 11'JTCN N -I i 1"1 • r.�l 1 t ( ^ 1 - FLY -. — I! 1 ' ;.�jl �I I FFI M - .. --- _ —---�-- - ul ,« — rnA. - '( ,I I,C-1 x�,• ij, ElavnroR L.>t i}?'I B I• . Lcl IBEO ,xRODN7 I. n vl. 1 BATH lM-4�'i,•'I PFY:.FS'� - _ T� - I r - _- STOPAGE - - --"'• _ �I. .}'[IAP I J 1'h�� O I •'( N .I A kl! I !'. .:} II •$ f ;- f.l 1 _ _ 1..._ � I I I E� T aE pp 1l i II BATH/ OPENTO BROVV .nIsEER �,~I BTROM2 eEnRoon ��=I R :"r•.a$ray �� s•.rr it VI, lit. +-- -- 2� jPlan.S! f Plaii 3f eariu iNr�xu wucE:rnr sr, w,ms I.,r u, nxaxt marrvrcF:las!. RHan PRMP�ci;lass_ rf`ORC2017-009251 I SU rTq 20147 NO1BassenianILagoni BU IFLDINGm'AX' 4YPL1A,E1X,� onr-lHEET A 3 , 14; THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS 0L04.IB Rancho C.I.-sa, CA 521.17108 VANDA£LE _----__—_--- ----- - -.--� r ' � WRA �'G GE GMAFGEf i G x E 1 'W MGE 1 '/GGARAGE1 j '—U51 CAR U51 --p Ln Lo A ELEVATOR $ x, � I -I _ 1 p W i I L0E9Y nARAGE LL .�,. 1 is•�} 1'`INPICrSN i_ — MEC — I.�w - __ _ A � ,gip L._ j - - {-�•I IL 1 ` Y 1 GARAGE lanae �� p51+- { ij RQOMI Yf1 7i_ i Is V 1'r REPRppH �'{�� E i--i,_" -,�SI -F--l. fnr�r� BE➢ROOtR2 1 plan 2XI [ueiu nw.noxwvi,[[:Inv. ip RC7ul7-an9js� SURTTfr201�7; SH EE T_HO BUILDING 'B' 9 -FLEX A3 . 19 BassenianILagoni First Floor- Contemporary _ Style 'A' El.—l— xlLxnFLSYAI•rHxAix[•Ix1uIyA1 �•�"—lei THE RESORT — STACKED FLATS Rancho Cucamonga. CA �rxr i_t=iii s s i.l 71 o e VAN DAELE nnxx. Plan If Plan 41 ZM1iH - - WMiF I.II/Sf WaelE�l.Paxl wurasForlrY�-rF V. MnxTEOFtr,Vul-ui(. oE 1//vv :E7!"+M 7Mum+e BEOAOOM i I 'fl' BEDROOH E f—�-- -F I ,, V•AIS I - GRE4T T M .. - � ''' � I ECJ � L'I _'w , I�, L- II_. ��. yl 1...•ell� ENT 7 __- i L 4 _ - f 1 �rtx •� L! *I 1 �e l I - - �L�I� JS.t�:+ Ln cn W � �.f i — �4 F k Imo— `I Fo l` LA 8FEIROOM7 - F' I•'•a �`•� I� �� f _ MAST{Stf �::ri-.7 __ -- f 6mADOM3 r sroaacE I OOH MASTCRTH I�J I .p n ll�1y OPEN Fo 1 �I M 1 BFLOw t 'll t� 1 I; I Hll57ER �I r. i 3� • �r n7� MAS{FIZ 1 .1— II. FM { _ BmROOM7 .. DEO! �I IPIa ] Plan 5 w,lu. rIwATFortx,Fr.�:I„ss nrvxTFaru,sr.cT.ms( IORC 2017-00925 S1,6TTp201+7 SHEET No. Bassenian I Ca oni BUILDING 'B' 4- P L E X A 3 . 20 j g Second Floor— Contemporary - Style 'A' El—auon re Itlplt-,lapel FF-I (Wrl —1�-- THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS 01.09.14 % R-1, Co4vmonga, CA 5z 1.l7 108 VAN DAELE 1PIan� Plan 4' rMr1M r,nf:envie wAut�l.mv rrlva o1w srue n v nrvAaval v.et:.+v MAsrpt i r I J r1ASTex ,!ow N y n- eBoi coni,1 eEan : �r t }_ r f o I hl 1L 1—— BEDROOM I 6Eonaon -1 -�- C Y NF�YZ ,,J 44, anon nd M,tSTE,I 9 ,$mR�On1 eATrs L.� I- r'--'—` !,t - , '- -^" 1..i�i7�•y..l .d-•{•�., ] �....- _- p rw ! J —_ l.S ' q"fS`1-{ ti'] VI _ J It w MNL Ln " A -0 1 - l +'l.41'tfl.EYATJ+ •11 gg -.A.� I F w� - ] � M1Y I' 1 a-�� _4 'd � �• li BM—M - f rw� If I 1, I �1 •- +.''s.n .� - BEDROOM) STOMGE Ta BATH - ! �� { , I�s I F• I1 1 � j I� IJ- OPENTD BELOW I eE00.60n 11 8EPROOM1 11111.;T .- " — 0 SIT - ,P an 3] IPlan 5] f ee°r4 16elxw WADLS�ev1 tF. a 1111 v rervAnsxrrvAcrs Inv- wvuratrwolvAst,la:r. odc�dt9•Boaasf Su aTTu20111 SHEET No BUILDING 'B' 4- PLEX A3 . 21 " BasseaianlLagani Third Floor- Contemporary - Style 'A' Elevation - etrncslun•ntrelRs•u«uers THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS oloe.le SCJ- Rancho CA - f 521.17108 VAN DAELE \� alum AWk z v \\ m \� : A "a t . K-p-, ON _ �� \, _ � \. \\ \ 'j \\\\ Y� F PLAN P. AN N BUNGALOWS k i I i i I a WWI co s BUILDING ':#_` 4 - PLEX A2 . ! RESORT TO',NNHOMES N ate` Ln La Sassemam a . VAN. :. ,., yam_ a a ON Ol OfLa 1E m v BUILDING [.s 3...fig �..5 - . ECS.-; - P L E X 2 4' -S RESOR T C,1A A z y� � tsnsSCFlljR Lamon' BUILDING 'D' - P ! EX IAN OA�- l _ l m OR 16 M M" 'ONT BUILDING 9 - EX A3 , T H E R S 0 R T S T A C K E D T 4� VAN 0�- Oma_ ww.t= Wn ? BUILDING '} 9i PLE ;_'a 2 NI Won � NN r i�/ l I CL t `/ ✓%/1 fir% r,� I l,r�l�i�' ill il.,ll... r nOd+ �i�➢ r Ei iiim � *""i � ✓,.r"'��ar �^..^ �`�, a . r �t ,1J% „r {a I rvalu A YY„ i C5- P4 A \ \ LO ilel \ � e _ FRONT BUILDING S' 9 - PLEX Al ` -non 1 n THE RESORT STACKED _L T'S VAN Ay_ rMT x co N, TOE REACRT PARK"A' �4 I 11" 7w w o "k- il "Ji all 6- nTo a _Z1 1_0 sl- L Ln A J� A py A' I sw Qj A f 114 V,A-,-P ff-RCIENT LANUSCAPEWORKSHEFT Ong LOW r PH t r U a LA41 aa c-, t fig) lift 1 X, 7 __ i 7-4111' A.; tom. 3 MW FEA�URL_FGLN",', r5 AIN VAN DAL E HOMES THE RESORT v { , 0 } d A SHEE iFOD R R E t= E kIVIC - - -- r a_ m STAFF 'A f x October 25, 20,17 'TO: Chairman and Members of the t lariraintl Commission FROM, Candyce BUrIaelt, City" Ranner t" HTIA"t"`f t BY: Mike Srnith, Senior piaanraer SUBJECT: PRE--Af PLlt'1AT0N REViEVV DRC2017-0t697 . VAN DAELE t.IOMES, lNG. ..,.. A request for o Pre-Application Review of a proposed m° xed nese development. con hating of 296 Units consisting of bungalows, towr4ionara , anc.l flat ran a property raonsi" fine raf nrultlfale parcels with a combined area rat ,1'6.7 acres within the Errnpire Lakes Specific, Plan, Planning Area 1" located north of Atte Street, south of 8th Street, west of t ilkiken Avenue, and east of Utica/Clev alp rld Aver°rues. •i.i.,Ya spe6fic location of the project site is south of 8th treet and east of the future ala nrnent of The Vinai APNs� 0210-082-41, ..49, and -52. Related films: Gener"al Plan Amendment D IRC2i 18•wp 1114„ f iaec; is [,Ilan ,rtaa endrnerat ORC2 118-8f`J848, and Tentative Tract Map " tn,.i" y��t173 REVIEW PROCESS: The Pre-Applioratlon Review process prravides a proj,eot proponent with the oppor°tur°bity to prmr.a eat chenaatic designs to the Planning ornrni cion prior to formal application aUbrn'uttal, in order to receive broad, neral oomr°rrenta and dlirections, The focus of the me tint is as di CUSSion by the Planning Commissioners regarding then, teohnira,arl and design issues related to the proposed project, The m efing is rant a forrrrn for debate and no formal dedson or vote is made. After than rneetlnfl, Staff prepares t eineral rninutes of the rue€setirrp, which are provided to the applicant, PROJECT S11 E DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND: The pro eat site is part of as propeity, of 18i: acres that vias formerly developed with the privately owned and operated Empire LakesGolf Curar.arse generally located in the, center of the Empire Lakes Specifk, plan (the "Specific Plan"), The�pecifira Man has an overall area of 847 bore, and is generally bound by 4th Street to the south, 1 lillikemn Avenue= to the east, Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue to tf-ie west, and 81h Street and the BNSFIMetrohnk rail lane to the north, The golf course was rebased in rnid-201 6 following the approval by the City Council of amendments to the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Development Code (related files: General Flan Amendment 'R d°18-00114, Specific f=Aare Arnendrrer°at Df C2018 81ty84d, and f rMYvelo,prnent Code Arn andraaent ;bRC201; -0011d) These araaendn°rents were for the purpose of enabling the master developer, Lewy s fdanardernent Corp., to develop a neve mixed use and transit-oriented project " rnpire Lakes/The Resort") hereafter referred to as "the overall project", The subject property is bisected into South and north halves by 8th Street. The overall project is intended to be developed in phases by various developers, The first phase will include all of the southern half and a small portion of the northern half. The southern half currently consists of three (8) parcels vaiffi a cornNned area of about 84 acres, An application to Subdivide it into 27 EXHIBIT I 8 5 W prd48 PLANNING COMMISSION PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW STAFF REPORT DRC2017-006097 —VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. October 25, 2017 Page 2 parcels and one (1) "lettered" lot was approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 2017 (related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20073). The primary purpose of this subdivision was to allow the sale of parts of the overall project to other developers such as the applicant, Van Daele Homes, Inc. The specific location of the project site is Parcels#14 through 15 (Exhibit C) of this approved subdivision. The site will have an area of 16.7 acres with a street frontage of about 310 feet along 6th Street. It will be bound on the west by the future, north-south primary street ("The Vine") of the overall project. Following the construction of that street, the site will have a frontage i along it of about 2,100 feet. Conceptual plans for a proposal by the master developer to construct a mixed use development on Parcel 426 located to the west of the project site (on the opposite side of The Vine) were reviewed by the Planning Commission during a Pre-Application Review workshop on May 24, 2017 (Pre-Application Review DRC2017-00170). That proposal has been formally submitted to the City for review (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20118 and Design Review DRC2017-00642). The master developer is also developing the designs for the various elements within The Vine that were generally described in the Specific Plan. They include functional features such as "tabletop" street crossings, roundabouts, and "pocket" parks, and decorative features such as art installations and landscaping. The Vine and these features will be presented to the Planning Commission during a separate, future Pre-Application Review workshop. I The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant' Mixed Use Mixed Use (Planning Area 1 2 North Vacant (north half of Mixed Use Mixed Use (Planning Area 1)2 former private golf course South Vacant' Mixed Use Mixed Use (Planning Area 1 2 ,East Apartment Complex Mixed Use Mixed Use (Planning Area 6 2 West Vacant' Mixed Use Mixed Use (Planning Area 1 2 1 -2att of the south half of former private golf course:2-Empire Lakes 5 ecift Plan PROJECT OVERVIEW: A. GENERAL:The applicant proposes a mixed use development that follows the intent of Empire Lakes/The Resort as described in the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan is divided into twenty- four(24)"Placetypes". Eleven (11) Placetypes are located south of 6th Street. The land use characteristics and density of each Placetype are defined by six (6) different designations. The location of the project site (Exhibit D) is generally within Placetypes 5-21 (Village Neighborhood (VN)) and 5-22 (Core Living (CL)). It is also partially within the Mixed Use Overlay. The project consists of 296 single-family residential units as follows: 99 bungalows, 80 townhomes (or "RowTown"), and 117 stacked flats. The floor area of each unit type will be between 1,464— 1,536 square feet (bungalow), 1,497 — 1,715 square feet (townhome), and 1,178—1,731 square feet(stack flats). All of the residential units are for sale. Non-residential uses are not proposed within this project. The overall density of the project will be about 17.7 unitslacre (296116.7 acres). As the project site is within two separate Placetypes, it is subject to the density requirements of those Placetypes. The required density ranges for development i i F5-6Pg49 PLANNING COMMISSION PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW STAFF REPORT DRC2017-00697—VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. October 25, 2017 Page 3 within Placetypes S-21 (Village Neighborhood (VN)) and S-22 (Core Living (CL)) are 16-28 du/acre and 18-35 dulacre per Figure 7.6 (page 7-16) of the Specific Plan. The community/recreation building and associated facilities/amenities shown near the northwest corner of the site, at the southeast corner of The Vine and 6th Street, is not a part of this project. it will be submitted for review by the City separately. The overall floor area of, and the parking calculations for, the project do not include this facility. B. ARCHITECTURE, BUlLD1NG PLOTTING, AND SITE LAYOUT: The Specific Plan permits various different architectural themes throughout Empire Lakes/The Resort, The applicant has elected to use "Spanish", "Contemporary", and "Heritage" themes for the bungalows, stack flats, and townhomes, respectively. The number of floors (stories), interpretations of the themes, and floor plans are as follows: Building Number of Number Architectural Number of Number of Type Buildings of Stories Theme Interpretations Floor Plans Bungalow 99 21.2 Spanish 53 3 Townhome 4- lex 7 3 25 4 5- lex 5 3 Heritage 25 3 + 2 reverse 6- lex 1 3 25 3 + 2 reverse 7- lex 3 3 25 3 Stack Flat 13 2 Contem pwary 24 5 'Plan 1 is a"carriage unit%Y three floors when including the 31 floor option for Plan 3,3 not including the V floor option for Plan 3,'than a in color scheme only,S assumed as no elevations for these buildings were provided The bungalow residences will be detached, i,e. will not share a building wall with an adjacent residence, similar to a standard two story single-family residence. Unique amongst the other units and building types will be Plan 1 of the bungalows, Excluding the entryway and porch, this unit will be a one floor residence located above a set of garages. The townhome i residences will be attached in a row house arrangement consisting of between four (4) to seven (7) two- or three-story units. The stacked flats will be single-floor residences arranged vertically above one another similar to a multi-story apartment. Each of the stacked flat buildings will have a single entrance with a lobby. Access to all individual units within these buildings will be through interior hallways. Access to the second and third floors will be via shared elevators and interior stairways. The units within the other two building types will have direct, individual entrances. Based on the Site Plan provided by the applicant, the residential units are generally plotted together according to their typology. The bungalows will be clustered together in 33 sets with 3 units each and located generally along the east side of the project site. The townhomes will be grouped in 15 buildings with between 4 to 7 units each. They will be located generally along the west side of the project near The Vine and, therefore, will be the dominant building type along The Vine, The front elevation of most of the buildings along this street will face The Vine. The stacked flats will be grouped in 13 buildings with 5 units each. These buildings will be located at the north side of the project site in a reverse 'L" shaped pattern around one of the recreationallcommunity facilities that will be constructed for overall project. E5-6Pg50 PLANNING COMMISSION PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW STAFF REPORT DRC2017-00697 --VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. October 25, 2017 Page 4 Consistent with the requirements of the Specific Plan, the project will be an "open community"_ All streets within the interior of the project will be private, Le. maintained by a homeowner's association. However, these streets will be open to the public (non-residents of the project). Primary vehicular access into the project will be private street connections to The Vine at various locations. As the presence of gates and fences will be minimal, external access by pedestrians, bicyclists, etc. generally will be available at a variety of locations. Vehicular and non-vehicular movement throughout the site will not be restricted by gates or fences except, for example, where it is required by Building Code or desired to control access into private spaces. Where buildings are adjacent to The Vine or one of the several private, interior streets, pedestrian access to them will be generally direct. Numerous courtyards are a prominent feature of the project. Residents of building types will have direct access to these semi-private open space amenities. Distributed throughout the project site are readily accessible open space areas, parklets, and dog parks_ There also will be pedestrian pathways that will provide not only internal connectivity, but connectivity with the other parts of the overall project.All buildings/unit types will have direct access to enclosed garages. With the exception of Plans 2 and 3 of the bungalow building type, all garages are attached to the building/unit they serve. The garages for Pians 2 and 3 will be part of the same building for Plan 1. C. PARKING: Per Table 7.6 (Parking Standards) of the Specific Plan, residential development of 30 units/acre or less shall {provide parking consistent with the requirements described in Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code. The parking requirements for the project are based on the number of bedrooms per unit as follows: Type of Number Number of Parking Ratio Number of Buildingof Bedrooms Units (per unit) Spaces Required Bungalow 99 Plan 1 33 2 or 3' 2 66 Plan 2 33 4 2.5 83 Plan 3 33 3 or 4' 2 2.52 66 833 Subtotal 215 2323 Townhome 8o Plan 1 21 3 or 4' 2 2.52 42 531 Plan 2 23 3 2 46 Plan 3 27 3 or 4' 2 2.52 54 1 683 Plan 4 9 4 2.5 23 Subtotal 163 .1963 Stack Flat 117 Plan 1 25 2 2 50 Plan 2 13 2 2 26 Plan 3 25 3 or 2' 2 50 Plan 4 26 2 2 52 Plan 5 28 3 or 2' 1 2 56 Subtotal 234 E5-6Pg51 PLANNING COMMISSION PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW STAFF REPORT DRC2017-00697 --VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. October 25, 2017 Page 5 GuesVVisitor 296 n/a 1 (per 3 units) 98 Parkin Total Required 7121 747)4 75431 752)° Total Provided 758 'optional number of bedrooms,=the number of required parking spaces increases to 2,5/unitwhen there are 4 bedrooms; 3maximum when all units have the optional number of bedrooms.`based on the a 4icant's parking calculations see below Based on the parking calculations performed by Staff and the amount of parking proposed by the applicant, the project complies with the Development Code. However, there is a discrepancy between the parking calculations in the table above and the applicant's parking calculations on Sheet PA of their plans. This may be the result of rounding error; Staff will coordinate with the applicant to ensure that the amount of parking that is required and provided is correct. Most of the parking that has been provided to meet the parking requirements for the project will be in the aforementioned garages. Although the remainder will be on-street parking (on The Vine and interior streets) and in unenclosed parking stalls, per Section 7.3.5 — Parking Requirements (page 7-45), all on-site and on-street parking proposed for a specific project can be credited towards the parking requirement provided that this solution is validated by a parking study. D. WALLSIFENCES: The bungalows will have private yard areas enclosed by walls 6 feet in height for privacy and security. Similarly, bath the bungalows and the townhomes will have patio areas enclosed by 42-inch high walls. Otherwise, no significant walls/fences will be constructed with this project. There is an existing wrought iron fence along the property line that separates the overall project site and the apartment complex to the east. This fence was installed during the construction of that apartment complex. Although there are no openings in the fence to allow access through it, the applicant has anticipated the potential for that to occur by proposing a pedestrian pathway (at "3rd Place Space" #15 on Sheet LA, Exhibit J) that could connect to an existing recreation area on the neighboring property. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff comments are provided in the outline below for consideration/discussion by the Commission. DISCUSSION OUTLINE: o Architecture -- The Specific Plan permits various different architectural themes throughout Empire Lakes/The Resort. Although the architecture for the project is presumably still undergoing development, Staff notes that it is generally consistent with the intent and vision of the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan lists several standard characteristics that must be incorporated into the architecture (Exhibit E) to ensure that the design is consistent with the selected subject theme. Further enhancements to reinforce this consistency should be incorporated including the addition of other materials/finishes, details/trim, and colors. Staff also recommends more variation in the architecture of Schemes A and B of the Contemporary and Heritage themes as, aside from the color scheme, they are practically indistinguishable. As more information and details regarding the architecture are provided, Staff will provide comments/corrections accordingly. a Building plotting — One of the design goals for the overall project is an urban streetscape where the buildings functionally and aesthetically "frame" the streets. The applicant has E5--6Pg52 PLANNING COMMISSION PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW STAFF REPORT ORC2017-00697 —VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. October 25, 2017 Page 6 utilized the street setback standards (Exhibit F) described in the Specific Plan. The buildings along The Vine appear to be about 5 to 10 feet from the property line which is within the minimum and maximum range allowed. However, elsewhere, the buildings appear to be piotted too Tar, andlor are all at the same distance, from the street. To address these conditions, the buildings should be shifted closer to the street and their distance from the street should be varied within the setback range that is allowed in Table 7,5 and Figure 7.40 of the Specific Plan (Exhibit F and G). • Building massing and scale — Based on the elevationslrendering provided, the massing and scale of all the buildings are interesting and provide the required variation to ensure that a functional and aesthetic "frame" of the streets is achieved. As the side and rear elevation slrenderings of the buildings (and the elevations for the carriage unit) are not available and only the elevationstrenderings of the 4-plex townhome were submitted, comprehensive comments regarding them cannot be provided. However, Staff notes that architectural enhancements and treatment shall be provided in balanced, equal proportion on all elevations. Similarly, the larger townhomes (5- to 7-plex) should not be merely larger versions of the 4-plex townhomes. • Density—The density for the project within Placetypes S-21 (Village Neighborhood (VN)) and 5-22 (Core Living (CL)) are, respectively, 18.18 dulacre (204 units/11.22 acres) and 11.86 dulacre (65 units/5,48 acres). Part of the project does not comply with the density requirements outlined in the Specific Plan. However, per Section 7.3.2 — Placetype Descriptions (page 7-18), to maintain flexibility for responding to changing community needs and market conditions over the build-out, intensity may be transferred between parcels consistent with the Placetype intensity, provided the minimum required units are achieved. Where density transfers between parcels, in no case shall development exceed the net development total (residential and non-residential) established by Table 7.1: PAI Development Program. Therefore, if the proposed project is not modified to comply with the required density, then the master developer and applicant should be aware that future development of the overall project will have to account for this and be developed accordingly. • Land use mix (residential) — Per Table 7.1 (Development Program) of the Specific Plan (Exhibit H), a maximum of 3,450 units are permitted to be constructed within the overall project. Of this amount, 1,450 units are permitted south of 6th Street. The proposal is for 269 residential units. Combined with the above-noted development on Parcel#26 located to the west of the project site, on the opposite side of The Vine,that is currently under review by the City (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20118 and Design Review DRC2017-00642) that consists of 648 residential units, there are a total of 917 residential units proposed at this time. This results in a remainder of 506 residential units that can be constructed south of 6th Street. ■ Land use mix (non-residential) — Per Table 7.1 (Development Program) of the Specific Plan (Exhibit H), a minimum of 50,000 square feet of non-residential uses is required within the Mixed Use Overlay (with a minimum of 20,000 square feet south of 6th Street). As proposed, there will be public non-residential uses. The remainder of the required non-residential floor area (3,800 square feet)will have to be fulfilled in Placetypes 5-16 or 5-20. i E5-6Pg53 PLANNING COMMISSION PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW STAFF REPORT ORC2017-00697 —VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. October 25, 2017 Page 7 REQUIRED ENTITLEMENTS: The proposed project will require the following entitlements (minor applications are not listed): 1. Design Review- $11,187; and 2. Environmental Assessment, Initial Study- $2,853 NOTE: Fees are subject to change by Council Resolution and are revised annually on July 1 St. SPECIAL STUDIES: The Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the overall project evaluated it as a whole. To determine the environmental documents that must be prepared for subsequent site- specific projects, the following special studies will be required at the time of formal submittal: 1. Air quality study; 2. Noise study; 3. Parking study 4. Photometric study; 5. Trip generation and trip distribution analysis; and 6. Water Quality Management Plan NOTE: Additional special studies may be required following the formal submittal of the required applications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A—Vicinity Map Exhibit B—Project Description (prepared by the applicant) Exhibit C — Project Site Location (within Tentative Tract Map 20105) Exhibit D--Figure 7.6—Conceptual Development Plan by Placetype Exhibit E— Placetype Descriptions Exhibit F—Table 7.5— Perimeter Setbacks Exhibit G--Table 7.40—Collector Street (cross-section) Exhibit H —Table 7.1 — Development Program Exhibit I -- Pre-Application Review Department Comments Exhibit J —Full-sized Plans (distributed under separate cover) CB:MSJjy E5-6Pg54 I OCT013ER PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP IMINI.)TES RAINS �ROOM RANCHO UCGI" IC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Roll C"alL Chrm'irr°ru ru Oaxaca '5 P Vires C 1`4rrnan Macias _ .:... Commissioner Fletcher Commissioner uno commir:,Si n'erwimb rl:' .,.. 4`.,Wu, y Q,, t1•rrPrutt , `��1�� Gu u��ruru2r ut.ar�u dp°�;�Fr�u ��i.a, u�� u��ud`d. rlrvr;�'. ,��abu,a ;aat . I(el �'I" (flat" '„ :P�UBLIC EOMM71 mpwm�m uu �nmw. u This is the tiara and place for the general public to address the Planning Commission on any item listed or not lis trd oil the agend . State lint prohibits the Commission frrrrn rmddr s irup any issue riot previolua ly included n the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subSeqUent meeting, Coninients are to be limited to fire rninutes per individual or less, as deemed niece ry by the Chair,d pendiru p upon,the number of individual rnernbers of the audience,This i,,:, a professional business meeting and courtesy and cl r:orrmm are expected. Please refrain from any debate between eudi um n speaker, rriaking herd noises or engaging in any, activity which might be disruptive to the d coruarru of the meeting. a iN.kR fl,, � q#.;�t4 P"��e' , OdruC t! ",�ifMBE�@ 1 ti df M°e' `� R_r N"sBvV f f:lp;hpifnl,nvP�7r'.j h"(D"M tip. 2 a (7f,.,k � "d d,eril��a4afN i IStCUS 70NITEMS' 1�At �NG �OM MIS»SI,�N �� C1. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW ESC 201 A-0Cibp7 VAN DAELE HOMES, INC . - A, Fere. pplucati ru Review of a proposed rnNed use d `+ar lopr entrru sr stir esti 296 unts conss 'n of brarup l vis, truvaih rnes, and flats on a prope ty r,,onsr sting of riiultiple pzuroes with Page, 1 of EXHIBI�T J E5- pg55 yi dl /aaoi,�e�uaer h a +s � r OCTOBER 2 , 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION O R K,S H 0 P M I N LITE rS RAINS RANCHO; CUCAMONGA Q= CENTER 10,500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA waca¢rabnr.aarat area of 1 .7 awcres Mttataa the t»rnpw re Lakes Spa dfica Pla ri, Raarmr ng Area .1, Vocaated north of 4th Street, south of tate Street, west olf Milluiken Aver ie, arid east c:;mt (lticwaaaa/Cle elaarw ver11P.Ne the sprcifir` bc tion of the project site @s, fwbaa'ff) of 6th Street aaoc-1 east of thr-,m fUtUre a.a'l'lagrarnerwt of The "'ir°e APtis 02 W-082-41, 49, �.md RGMec� 1fpc s (,ene.ra� PV rl arrier'wrtrawawnt DRC2015 00114, tataew.mhwc, Ema'Baan Amendmerut 2015 tl0040, and Ter,Oaative Tract ct 1a lr usi'°t"20073 AO sn'1111r ".lcaarccm,cb Plaarcb� the larcltrar l and gave a t'ro w igrpo r'wl,rwescmtatr,:)rr (cr°rpy on Ne) He noted thir,a lch,,"rttrrrtl aaaan ly of �ar t�rct�a�slaarra9 �at lcaa ttbca 1..br�ralpc�ct raa urllhm the lrrast,ra allowed iaarrtla the a,lrb.cylarcr, lmlaarm lcaaclalrucl crcclr.bcrr�rneotaa 1-�t'a, noted ca waa°.mr'a�vaa„aty raahlcaarlrng solr,atrcccas adamalcrctarall The tainiec is allowed He said the ,applx,,aac,1wrcarmrlalred mthr dace no wraaatl/Pacrarmes tl"`arlwrorerr°aenl i4e raaabmt catcall a, 4maat receive arca rea x etawaawad"rons He said a"Mai enor was &"apn ° in U1 his clear ;,m(y ca/c..rrlaatcrc)ri het,r the 1°:ara,iect he has w,r,-.)a`a cleid it a°ah)d ttraw,raat`orf,:ry, rmi rewwd lr mw'm is ca aaded hale ttarwa rappilwaraaa't Fac Sccheca,la Oc,,e Prewwca'lcarct of Oper atcccraa,a aa°&d he tmcaj,,,)ea ttl:a stilrracbet rac 1 rrac.rralla tica gave aa' l�rr1,.t,ac�,amrarwrawr (')Ohe vaarr,cicaawa taw,arlrtlrag uaatYl r.,calrr.cse, ,J 110 said(tie l,mr lracl �s rwwer°l7aarhr,aac1 on the standard llcaaatiVaara and the tarmragraalrawar o,aotjld tbaa ccwarawr°freer cart even with the Y'w flcacar option He Said the taaP°'ma siL,"aalalr)g 1s 11:aa,tised onthe rrataarlrar laaaa,%.aaama crabrro ^,a°h arm hie said passive uses are, added into lar,aaaao rc:crrnectrcar'w,a a"aaa well as a:a dog piark area iquiet seaatar'rra and ctrcula'traato taac°,twwararo^n tlwcaa l,aractc t 1r'a Said the plan pioncofes laacadestnaarr traffic A iepi esc°rmtaat`wwae of the aahal:atcr„ rmt har•caar aaawtcad b;rrrac:,alrtwrawat lawrala arg elievaalbrans c°ar,. the r rrN" 'rnis'.upone s r P.?vieiu 'and r:'orrmrr'"erd Mr Scheck raaarc°:l rlJey as l,e Jo. olltrag into colors aanc°i may adl acl'clmtacrraaal cHcalor aartcarnies Co,rrrrn,rssroirw,r' ltrtrramb°aar saac(l' It is am gioicxl product wact he trues the a:ar icula°ahon and t,twe design tc')rrk arelt c°'ood H notex] toa� Challenge as � �� a a t" the w aa'at rar.� r,a .:alca rcaa� rarer � � 1 ., �� tt and ac.ttaa.a.. ,a and c ccontinuity �� a arc al t � alithiprath harra� �.ot' t~ e caecal he tikes thaw, rrontcarrrlaaaaaarlr taalwra racy the heritage and Spa°mrrmsh rm:rcarrarrmlwaaamcrmner Wimberly y air^lrcaed Corraracraaa°rc,)nel Macias said he is r lcativel'y c.carmrlbrlrr, le-they need to r^naake amrrrne tweak's and ther) lcrcac:°'m;ed Page 2 aa1 try— 4 OCTOBER 25, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOPINLJ"I"E RAINS RANCHO I 1..1C dMONG CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CEWER DRIVE RANCHO CLICAMONGA, CALIFORNIA ��6"-If1l6r;J'� r; „1l ad , md h Wn; Me 9.;WoiW J" iiy !r¢rLP,!tfW o1V",Vie nab % rruOi.V he I`ad °1 h!1'b`eu; ab ul Me keh,/hnn ;ails 0 "No hemaye W'.§gn but it "ioad," i"', '6'Rf��d ti Fk,-" °i?aa(J tfto f 4,'v')th the modem vniJPI0nnk(" d they aft I!q a`g 4) dw°°me Fie w,i'WCY Y14r1 °Ct�rsl, !rr Iv,,.�i,�"ll knis alwdCC"m bw ;'u;'fw:§rvs Hie ..zlr;x psI 1-h, ,.,r:�1!f� d "4up '.,W aaH Me f', rvapaP7es coi ah as V,,/o-.'9ti`i°dIk",r S Q ''i"�Pfl„h tho nhlPeu„h an 0 I= re a6[ra°t,"the C,e/oumrsm)a dh Hwy s ,PId4J a f f ,;tCyih/�dl,aia dCaa�.JrF;f1'l�^, :i'.dPrlrl�” ef,; lfi';ll 1141"' fay r saw us orfl he", a,. ha awm a l cm iaca Sao 0 tikti'lW ho WOW W into` e, aduiv ° °/BfrCdl`s of Me raICVon fs a"ino M o/ � Conminswiwr War°afery agned hf"Y 5!>" Q:d ;aNao :hJ1,,uh! he rI,RC"p amWaNd h7 n`,.Jh°,"°Rvsu ekn"J ."d,I if l fl,,td, y,rl+'dFn"lh,S`/P4etd`,/r C;i'°',C / hhsa/V6"f0'n k"...1.amdUFd?a nl(d eU a =7 d'SCsdvuent Wal top s.,h bach of s,UP"tl.hr,ld,BE'"; , ',any >!rhie Cr'Caw. fie, asked I Ci'td,u h 9 v been p°V s n1V`4,d At .'"aPBPIIhi Wed that CiC"co-htv<su a d4/P"rCF'yed CI,hV n has "at beini gCCmwr. ed VM W".Vyipmt if;/kr.Uf„e Uh/.a° ailC"ai C.0 Ih"a°aa ,oyaaWd We ad;dv of kge of Ole !ke>„Ub arks A NiNdBaCF."d 6n r"`tm"I �NV°U'nsat we w.dddh to Paine the Wet d . dl"k',� °`r'y��h d'JI��P �N ; hadC}�P"p�� y4.11 �h"N� C ddd hha�a aPdaCh :aMlud`abaaM�d dna �,bp�$I'anA (3 . P40RTH EASTERN SPl..iEPtiE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN G:)RC201 -007 0-µ,Vi Planning ComnAssion Wksh p to r vieva the proposed co n emtian areas of the North Eastern Sphere rnnexatio n Project (NESA ). RNaW 3 applications include: General Plan Amendment DRC2 f16...00749, "mint Map Amendment D01 -00751, Edwanda North Sp clfic Plan ArMnendm nt DRC2015-00750, Norah, Eastern Sphere Annexation DRC2015- 00732, and related Environmental Impact Report. Toni y,i`d"w„a'hn a"Uw`5d"aa.F= 11r.dNada „ 05&d»'d..uro d Oie p oVa"r ct wa ,d stated d th`aar C �s�°a� d Intl C:d n thH a Usil.tiY,ud dra r h/p NI ',ar 'rice 3 of E5-6Pg57 1 OCTOBER , 2017 a NSI PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOPIN iE RAINS ROOM RANCI,-M CUCAMONGA CIVICCENTER 10500 CIVIC: CENTER DRIVE RANCHOLICA ONGAa CALIFORNIA r"eciewed am.' �fle'd b,bJ (see p,,jt)jjc d*'CrrrCrarrr'r� °c'ou„'n) 'aavu Sar,(Ya.nlI aresr.ara'ara.arc �� opy cava ap Ca.anc'yc e ffinnc:a" citji�a , °kcrrrier said is being saict carr sc,cia a'rwcfiia ata'oul t'aa, t..m Meat She iQ'M^j'x)de�'! thair't(:)ch"-1 fa'aff raa rarr ii"""' l "r Cc'aar'ar'gc F?ie aarraa/&'ir as rapaaa rrr r xp,6,rur wrcaro i Budhist '"c.adrsp�0'ra 236is of ar'acarrl157 00 c uarre-, feet and 4 in evcess of 50 if f in height i ,said the'i."'e Pypcc's of apPlrc""ations are one of reasoriis vive ares(JomH q this a annawar'rcbr'jirasS'he said if Me notc,W project ruicives f6marcl c' wau havea huge rrarpa°"af ' at) that rri�c°* Ortega at Dudek ii,it c�rurr ca'a t c'c"arrscr"aanir ) s&Ipai lieis of daa e' prr"r arr' 'ha' c,od.a'ai li a'lorcrc"ad ifd"this "��w " ksed�rPlrrrW�rrrr�rPcr,'"s �,�r'rdef ��ritn'h',i, G.r�d`�tF"4",fit viii b �."i��"]�,"r�„!�'rrr�e to d”A"a�rr"r"atait r a,=�irN'tl� �.PrR�,�rrr"'drr��rV:k ��'rr, Ca:amrivs"vner_Mum,? asked if the 1� riats ate raund"acrr cap c%"r)aa'a'they ar.aa.,at 'd'ra�ac�r.a Alt, Ortega said both rhe haabb'a"at caraarlic"I .aaapport Oval aaraa' IRAFaaaw"i He said it is d,e»argn a1c,'0 a crrdre:a0' 'raa'rr��aa� �e�a, ^aaarc� r�aa ��raraa �a� aH'crrrara�,a��rea,ar��r�,aa�,aw rad�rr,��r rar �a� araa��a rsr��a�ar�a, aarra.�aw� a.r� ��'�' Mr, ,a a a �r r ,, n�"r°a l Wafea�a trapping a aaaa° -10 rar les away frraa�a,�r r�rd final area tr�r.arr�r ra��ucl by a naar rrt niciled t that th araea theSti,at as SBKF ha��abita' the clot-tservation prrorrly area is 3176 6 acares vara rad ar'abfied aaie a was changed Mr.Odega :'a vii the a;arr"r'pnt hydrological pP°ocp ;:Nein/Va1 1CPw'`'ar' flaws are not �-view»+aiA to susta?arra the, Soil r ds fr)r SBK ' Saar'its possiblefthe cmwcarrld in theh4cnes �prrra ''rN e c�'�wr � aa'Caa':a'cr�.c'rr cd-'rar �'a'a '.,aa�a'''crrrre W Sargent rrrrferf f' aaa' Fara rre�s��'raaar° r� �d��cai�`�arr�°r' hasrr r a��:aseac' aar rrr'c a°para" er�r� theraraaa�adawaa�e'rcacai area ir1tlr"aprr �a d dea r. Or'e as ra d this p'aara cNcrravacarves the l argaa,' &'7101.111 of RAFSS area 400-500 acres "ac�';i 0 fraaaa a e'er a�raa' said theerr'e Deparar�rra rat hasloc'°r're at fire frs�a'ot maps arid the o mill l at '65' o�Rr�✓fid�aur�"y"� i V ✓r as OCTOBER ( PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINU"I'ES i air (4ero RAINS ROORM RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC GENTER 105,00 CIVIC CENTER D,RIVE RANCHO, CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA IdJdal S xy„m N !IeTY Vie .IlAsn(1':.bgr.," of a cofrvdPiFel'1eninve ""11an Fg ;mou mmunromwe w "rWifadroJd.toFN µ,,4.a"dbyleP1wIi";raaMal wwAlunduder(,.nnn'fal Vii 'roo/Ntwd&',,llbirill,"°Ibnfv`h ("/.Jw("ab'✓1!u xyJirae,do` r„/V.rV?s at Fie F'attlm yo : ca" y"a::`w the hdo.✓Cm of 010 haabl!`,u and P``.aldR( vu awpe m7yaM", Q4 y:9..ad � 4 Isar! k„ddyv, wyW� N°slJ 1"allddl""r:;d,� Ca1'd 1"f",il,N(laldl.` rn f"ba"er.:fial,.a(ly- the loam dkl,dadyrJ "",Ua';, 10 fue dl"�i�.akr„^�d..,a:� y4`,k I�"0ale�a✓aa "weds f)pNi a V ea` wd'r`ahk Pd,✓f ". B aR ^Tmf floiv l' i tea✓.ti.ildlW-)' +°a"W Q,Pl+kS d., i ,as"v`,s('xthr'” d Wy EBtiyvbfw; Wed vVie'I"n" agar,,cl1Pl;.w4`iC°ku; 17l V a U3 croal(,✓",F K00 0 dW d"1'final la w �,.•i„ifPaPWir a..d I,a I N`yddlioz asked imov does N)a El6odalalP"l"' hawtQuyl a4a1 Hu) kU, ydeady� fTy Y I "r 1 '% 'i` I t h qr p v ,Py iJ r 4 ,k , 'r p�yN:,'` ya4y ?Cdr,.� y"% "lala� (,Pa aaai.;y✓'"4if4,lra i;l✓4.Fr t "1";RE tldr,t az.y u�al� �a;`.`�, u,A. Ia" (fY ;+�"i," �rdll �ar aallfy ad.J a;alC„° d 'r'"`a and soulb °°Joi"d they have tr✓f"e i;rJpr"abdoyi to ab it and the fP;,ra;dl, ive cCfrPu (a n1rwi; laa'akfif`kyl,d SaoHay rwi"� r�7,I"F.yr""dI iyyrd., a"�ld.�, frill ud�wa"J�✓a Nia�ldb .8uk9,°yil� d✓drJa�aaf. dl.7llP M ri? da dfaGly � Il"fid a.{:br"Pdla'u `aVl"(da Macias how yamg yyus a9"'d'dl ME 1,+ral haF l�. ;�a.�6 � v`tit(" ik uvi✓ ,@ sq,hacrd� "'i'o d I'v"i� tlW yGP°'da4 bn,,,s' ," k`a{.,1 Wd agmement is ar✓acA°e'a`d la"1rah hVI and '.p°w "a "'iod iiv1i','iP dPd ydti lE"f"'fl"P^oet rrJ,(fkKyF kaY"P'a fadaep o; rf;�,dbPa'ur.ar`# changes He ra..ekmf WA/ mush mdad kd 8d`q .PY.f um S"alp`e fda Ads y�'$kakkd4°ytl a",a�;fauJiiaa'6'aa`ayu.a"4°.y NC�Pray a'alw<"i;�a,. �a,da,J�d?da,ud ddi ua."'d;yb46�"da°d`if&a,.�'I�yi.d 4.,a"9, oad�,`:.✓a!"a"4"hbca o II°� ��,"'"a �Pau,�'a?�]�6,.,i""Di✓�," ydpk.c Ky'u„y"F.ddf:�a�'.ad,rwoa t"w1 ,,"yt pur 'Chase tnmgau"fa1n /ands and pay ties to uaawaNi"u ��hd9„ ads .a�drld,a„'�;"a° a�yk"';" i.k�i�.a".��(alya;,i" d!a t'n that as y alt doa Ws comes in da'"iii'4, band ia new ycdn!J value i Oa'alad;;d 0 y.;udr.du+dPIS a ua'.'tr1l u",a4xC_it yp,ayFaaaa There a: a,r y,»k"gy' li ar (hat wdd( L0')e"ae i4e it ydP"a Mal ss developed acye 10aap. n lands maP he 6dyd " d is sk;+C."° s0 c,p;`,;u,� dvatda a�ad aP ° e'aa@d "/ayl d" ansd y"r ma fa'bd n dF";"PC roUy ask".,✓ dd an Ja"t"ea'!Y4dNR,"nt a;a jx y,low" ,,iwy bt,,,t. .JF r , y c"h aM q"ng v'rdl d"^,1(ah; back to Hie R✓"aPTdiPYr"dg Co'dl'N'daf"a,".ofain aarPr'!d Men N) Coy cwd'1u! d'uf h ngaa NlaacO' s swi d we aaaF° try;' q y<a ✓nii'r iif'J;6c ,d (a lga 'R" Jh"ibda0a B.dr.Jl,a!e (c ad+=f ko ,„nrc,.aid !a"AP✓.;,° wd.Nuk! have to gel a ,axTn "alldfa,..,.aa" V dr a in ,yl",)✓.>ar dad s Jdvi l haat v» ""a to 01wda`a4n e the Spats ay y`a yhr,aak daua"yuga" lk:)ns, then tdd"tiddQ d3"iiit`gisild'mi 'afaes y'qWes P✓"iia'lu,aesa s'4 rued g(ea?lef Was) Men S 4✓alus ��M� ��°aa d^d� ��d.°�pac costs He Wd Khga-aPNon Ind aloe; ,,,j ire tiug~hw tf,;an the develiope land d 'vaalmA "' Mf' d 1F"feq", 'iro l �l.�„ r,",1 vafel '. rI;)J/v ""„ r1.JFlklw ,', may d ll; da. dki.o A fJry lr4✓ra aa)dJ M y"a'"a's Page 6 of 6 E5-6P 59 OCTOBUR 25, 2017' PLANNING SI .WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS RANCHO CUCAMONGIVICCEN'TER 101500 I 'Ic CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AN SaastdeW camel tdap°ad if at is aaot.usf c,00seovecy but entranced we will get better�^ taaaa Yaaaad we are adraetong card sat`�� a�aaa�a°.�daat �� aaaaaad taaasa°aaadaa aa�ddd��a" waddaaa�towaa a"a�:aa°a.aru°a�aa�aaaa aaaard aatdas�aaaa ��°��°tda!°��-a��a�:a� �ur,�a"�� ,"I�a�� chap a,Vatda the ca.ao,vaaadaaalacni Hiro mid eaaaaaataaaaby the "'nd of the plat'? Wa„asma daadaaaarcano aura pay dc,,aa tdaaaa aadaea d,a<aaat �� au°aaaaa��aa�ra�m�a°a�adHad.,ndoa�r� da�aau`d^�� have tc) t) � � �� i dtaatia ;s �oaatas��at a� w,, add da:aa.ata dadra��a and nada aas�tit� � ad raaaadad d�aa. aaa�aa��aa da�aa�tdaa. daaad':aata°at ad a�� aWaa a�aaattaaaua udaaad tta t aadd aau�,a��a" daa tt�a�a;a a a�� r°at d�w�aaaaa��aa d°d"a�a.a"aaa'aaa �aa dmmdsa aaaaaa°aaaonaaa a 'iauaa�rz b�� a'd d,"aaivaa akvi I dtums thenad Mays ooth 169 daaaaant'y Ads Burnett a a�amate t raad there cavo ,,,i taa,s« the (oontjoas aaaaasdaarang for adaaaaa`adaadaaaaamaad Mr Baa Srrntib 'saaaaraaa `11aasaaaa.a smd thm, slafd riogakirly gots ataaraaatdons aabaaaa� aaa dtaaa udddadaaaaa;a aarp d t)caddan°d flus tada,aaa aaata.a dad aaaax aasotatad settle) that, Mr, Ortega (soaataraaasaad a aa?,& aadsaws turiler daaaadtdsa will lJo aaaaamnaad(oibaaaad as t`a.V) Mr Esdaan,c)aa,a aaa ad,ad"d iaaa as aaa .-,.aaaddaoend i,")ai.daaaai for fr&lheads AN Saa emt a atadaaaad yes t saaaaaaaa ,aaaaaaaaaa �aaaa as saaaad(he aaaaaa r°f daaa,adada°arns expenenceid at the dataaadta adawiani,diq ariasea°iaeaaa°caaau"n, t aa�n whal war s nntacada t aa:j Mr` "�aaadaaa°at saaana°d dasu�aa°aaaaaap aaaawaaadad daa°aaa daa daa adsadaap�a.adasaa aaadd sera daaad�aadd aaaaaaaasaa�rasaaa�dadaaaa on'laaaa,aa aataaasea Munoz saaaa"d he has raaaaaah bett a-uot'lerstao(hng of the d ra daa.arat at ts as taagiaat d.alan ta. S aaa eol said tt as a"a t:awal aaacog,aro t Ini~t the ;Van a ill.araC up the framework 913 P Page 6 of 8 E6-6P 6O Vl� s � OCTOBER PLANNING COMWSSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RAINS ,NCI-110 CU Get CIVIC CENTER 10500 I' IC CANTER DR,IVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1, Lois win Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the C*ity of Raricho t ucairrtrrn „ sur my designee, h r by certify that a true, accurate copy of the fcrr gohig agenda mesas feasted on ctobar 19, 2017, seventy two (y ) hours prior to the meeting per Government +c)ras U at 10500, Civic Center Drive. f cais J, Schrader Planning Comirvission Selcretsr'y ga.,nity of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC O A frDffESS THP PLANNING Oft"f affw" SION The P annc nrt tu,carrurruic,slrarr onr.iu,.rrs sys frpe expression of r.,kY trrcint.., of view To mlow a9Y persons to sgrea�c;° given the hsngth st th-, agenda, plaa5e keep your ratrnaarksa b6ef df others have aIrssady expressed ycitrr posilaon, a,rO U1 r.0°a4ay SrMfrly indicate t,tst you agree e with a previous speaker If«approfaraste, s s, okesg,arar,soru may present the "i9eois of yourn6r � rUp To encourage aH virvws and prornote, .,crurresy lto Gathers, this r.,t,ads ance shotfld refrain froau i dapping, t:aooir°g or shouts of approvar or ditsaagrosnanrrt firorn the, 'au dE rice If YOU S cjr ibrrl"jYTNN`'bodatV PLUS to participaato hi rV11.� rm1,CpVng,pl viae contact the,PIan niri DePAr0nP. u+ It$909)477-2750. rr^rt4 ,tui n ar 48 r ows pror to oie rr'eetin.;wiV Pnaabfie the City to r`NrVake rd;assC3a'9&,v a'rrangernent'b to,ansr.rre accessib ttRy r.sten ng deh,dVices are ra>,raaVrWe for the hoaring,urm paired,. The far„uNic may address the Planning Cornmr ssion on any agenda item, To address the llsnriincf Cornrnissirin fall se corne forward to the faoditan°r located at the r,ranter of the staff table fatrate your nrante for the record and speak Into ffic, rrrr;ro'fihone after speaking, rjiease sflgn In on flia olat bo8rd located next to ttaaa sl,)eaker's faodiarrn, it is irnportM.ant to list your name, address and the agenda iteim letter yoivrr comments refer tca, Comments ars generally finaYtsd to, ft minutes or individual. It YOU MSh to speak concerning an itsrn nol on the nrdaandar, YOU May dna so under °`PUblic; Comments ' There is c"a l°ortUllity tO crperlYr trr~dertN5 section prior to ttrsr nr"d of the agenda, Any handouts for tl-ie Ranr)ing t"��ornrnjss'i,on should be. 6vrsrr to the Manning Cornrnr ssOn SecreLk ry for dt stmt° utYon to Page, '7cif E5- Pg 1 OCTOBER 25,a PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOPI RAINS RANCHO A O A 0VIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC NT W ° RANCHO O A, CAS.,-I 'ORNA area t;Wraraarnis iori ara, cory of any surr a rraaati:",iai'a ShOLM tiaaa be prrravnried to the Secre,6arry W be r,s,ed frac the oft lal CnMakak record All requests t'.ar rtern r to be rjki ed on a 1"- aaneaE-ig raornrrrrs ion agencia raiu t be in vrri ing G eqr,eas, for , tw r<a.aturap rfr"nda itr ums wM be at nie dis cr 'kirii� of time cmnrnissron and: the PlaarwrO'a!g Drraratrrr. AVAILAMUTY OF STAFF REPORTS Cop,(-,'�S of the staff repiorts or other drrCrrMenl foram to each agenda ut as are on file ifs the offices of the Nanmng Department trert Cwt krtau, Maqtr rk at 10500 Dvic Cemer Drive, Rancho Cucarrio ngatt 30 'These d C LP'll ri:.tr cfions during reralar business iraU(S, c)r cfay trraagh" hu rday 7.00 am to 6 00 trrprarv rG a Crr, . ak irsf exceptfor legal City h0days yas Any mterested party who disagrees rraitta the Cr"drty Piannirr Commission dedsirar� may gat pea-aM the C« rnnrT-6ssMr rn decision to ttne Catty Council mdMn 10 arat radar days, Arry appleefl filed rnust airs direcled to, the Dly r,"erk Office and must be gat saran paanMed by a fee of$2 662 for afl dt-Ci$0WIS Of the COrrara°ru,SSiOrr. (tamers arra established arartt governed by 1he City C or.rrac,H4 Please turn Ott alt aara0tullarr fatrones anid pagets hil the meetIng is ira session, Copies of tyre Planning Commission agendas, staff reploft and r,,.rainutes can he fraaarad t &tit M� . Page 8 of'8 _ ' l/ �p Nri�M rpt l 'x 1 i � . . 14„ut iVN puri'7nrnr IVNVI �JULY 32018 - 7 : P.M. DESIGNEVICOMMITTEE AGENDA A�.ci olh RAINs, Room "Y HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER 7:'100 F11 Roll Cell: lay Wimberly Rich Macias andyce Burnett (Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz Tony Gulielmo Francisco Oaxaca B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any itern listed on the agenda, State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Cornniittee may receive testimony and set the matter for a ub e l,uent meeting. Comments are to be limitedto five rninutes, per individual or less„ as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy, and decorurn are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making Iloud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting, C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each, presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded, to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input, ;1, ENVIRONMENTAL L SESSMENT" AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT 147- VAN DAELE HOMES, INC,- A reveww of a proposed SUbdivision of three parcels, with a combined Page 1 of 4, ShPT 7 r iv vsi,vr .- P.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE, AGENDA ACTION RAINS CITY HALL. 10500 CIVICENTER DRIVE area of 17.23 acres into t:tmree (3) parcels els sand foerr(4) letter lots located within the Enrpirem Lakes Sp:aecif c Plan, I lannintl Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of tett'« Street, wrest of Milliken Avenue, and east: of Utica/Clev lE-grid Avenues. The spedfic locz'rtiorr of tl"ie project site is south of 6thStreet and edam of thew futurealigrarnea.int of _FhEaE easorl Parkway (fora-nearly referred to as The Vince); APNt ,,0210 -082-41 49, and 52. Related files' Design Review D C2011 7--00925 and Pre-Application DRC2017 00(397, f)ursuant to dice California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an Errvironrrae ntaaal Impact Report (BR) ( CH No, 201 0 1083) on May '18, 2016 in connection with the, Uty's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC201 .. 00,114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC 201 5-C1(:tt140, and Dtaveak)prnent Code Ara"Ier.drnerrt DRC;201 5,00115, PUrsu amnt to CSE QA Gt.fldelines Section 15162, r.ro Subsequent or. sc.upplernental EIR is rerluire.d in corinection with subsetlaaent discretionary approvals of the sarne project. 2. ENVdF O1`ME C TAt.. ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC:2017-00925- VAN DAELE HOMES, INC,- A request for site pian .and architeCtUral reviem of 296 units consisting of bungalows, townhomes, and fiats on mu tpp:ale parcels with a combined area of 1123 acres within the Empire Lakes Spedfic; P'an, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, SOUth of 6th Street, westof Milliken Avearn(ae, and east of Utica/Cleveland AverrUeS. Tire specific location of they project site is south of Fath Street and ea-gat of the fretum ali nr-raent of The Resort sort Par way (formerly referred to as The Vine): APN0210-082-41, 49, and -012. ReWed files: Tentative Tract Mar) SUBT F20147 and Fier-Appfl cation E) C.20'17-t7C 697. E'urs;.,m t to t1,.re California Environmental Quality Act (C:,EQA)m they City certified ars E n'Vronrner,.mtal Impact Report (EIE:) (SCH No, 201504`1083) on May 18, 20116 in connection with the City's approval of General Elan Araaorrdnient D C:t2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC3201 5..01()040, and Developn°rrant Code Arrrt,ndrnent DRC 201 5-.00115. PUrautan't to CEQA Guidelines Sectbrl 15162, no sr_rEasequont or supple mental BIR is re gL6re;d in connection with SUbsequent discretionary approvals of the sarne project. C3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-0 0G 654 _.. CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES — A proposal to construct a mixed-use devesloprnent comprised of 2 bupldir.rcls consisting of 2017 multp-farrflly units and 14,3001 square feet of commercial area on a 3.21-acre siva located within the Indr~rstnal Dark(IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay(H'AOID) District at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 26[h Street—APN: 0209-131-01, f e;lateed Records: General ral IE'lan Amendment DRC 2017-00658, Zoning Map Amendment D C 2017- 0()6 a7', Development Code Amendment DRC201.7'-0063, Uniforn'-i Sign Prograrn DRC2017- 013 d and Minor Exception DRC32017-0 0872. The environmental document is in the process of t-.)eing! prepared. Page 2 of 4 1' r, JULY 1 , _ . m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA cT 1N RAIN Room CITY HALL 105010 IVIG CENTER DRIVE 7he f'o.,^.ign Revlraa,,s, t.,rrdirrraarttore of the jrrrodrkrrt tr,a the 1'-"tr;a,rnin C4. FhJ"v'lRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DC x,;201 7-00659 ...., CHARLES JOSEFIH ASSOCIATES — A prcpoi�sa: to establisl'i aL. nifor—rn Sin Proc,prr��n-i for new n-pi ed-use r3c vellopr.i'mrit on,) tIse l est 2 bLlHdings conssflng of 207 ffll.H i-f�M)0y UrlitS an 14,300 scgu.araa feet of cornaraacarcirai area on ra a. 1--ar,,re site Iiocat d within [lie lndcr trial Park �1P) District and l.,.tavcan AvenUe Olverin (l°1 C.D) District at the Srauttavvest corner of' Haven Avenue and 26th Street _, APN, 0209-131-01. Related Record Ger)er l Plan nnA:,ndnient DR- C2017-00658, Zoning Map Arnenc.daient DIRC 01 a"-00657, i nvnlOpMerit Code Airnendrnent DRC2017-0th 15 " Desk.,r �•�v ra L' "�' t ' 7-00654 :,rM i _c�•, �t e �t .fa� � ,� 7 Vic, �,vv C �1 � �d Minor � N�laticara (��F~Miw,��.1'17.,t) �t'T�. The envircar nientrol d=Arricant is in the process of l:aning prepared. The igri d e� ,,id�its Clod"nnPffi..,,�?e recd rr?,onnended e)p 'B`o'va) of the j,;i qject lid k"tre (,Ianain t, r tirngyp",) sw k:)),�. D. ADJOURNMENT The Design Review Cr°amrnittee has adopted ytcdrrrini tr,atdve Rer, ulations that set an 11:00 pi.trr, rrcdjrar,mrraror nt time. If iterra,s go beyond that trine, they;rr°trall be heard at-dy ver"th the consent of the Comrracttee 1, Lois J''. 'Schrader, Planning nning o mmi ion Secretary f the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hr by certify that a true, accurate Copy of the foregoing nda was pound on day, Thursday, Jeune 28, 2018, at lowest seventy two (7 ) hours prior to the meeting per Government nt o d'e 54954,2 t 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Cad. Page 3 of 4 F — P lG/l/U/Ill/ i i a « 1 JULY 3� rtir� DiESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGEN�DA c"i'" N RAINS, Room ITS HALL, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE City rat Rancho C LICa a'll a n gl a if you r7e'd spe(,rM �asSiStaflGe r a.a�c�a�a'raa Ioda�'taons to p artor;op atca fn the s rt eefia�g, please Cc aata ct the Planning Department z'at (9091) 477-2,,750, Nof%tccation of 48 hours tarbr to the raa ebrig will enable than (,"(y to make reasonable araang ra ent tO el"ISUrc, r a,ac.,c„rar;aait hty Listening devices are amrrG.afl able for the hearing ini a~aired. — P DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Nikki Cavazos July 3, 2018 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20147- VAN DAELE HOMES, INC.- A review of a proposed subdivision of three parcels with a combined area of 17.23 acres into three (3) parcels and four (4) letter lots located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of UticalCleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway (formerly referred to as The Vine); APN:0210-082-41, -49, and -52. Related files: Design Review DRC2017-00925 and Pre-Application DRC2017-00697. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2015041083) on May 18, 2016 in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925- VAN DAELE HOMES, INC.- A request for site plan and architectural review of 296 units consisting of bungalows, townhomes, and flats on multiple parcels with a combined area of 17.23 acres within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street. and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway (formerly referred to as The Vine); APN:0210- 082-41, -49, and -52. Related files:Tentative Tract Map SU BTT20147 and Pre-Application DRC2017-00697. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 2015041083) on May 18, 2016 in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Review Background: The Planning Commission reviewed this project at a Pre-Application Review workshop on October 25, 2017 (related file: Pre-Application Review DRC2017- 00697).The Planning Commission advised that the projact was consistent with the Empire Lakes Specific Plan intent and vision, however the architecture needed more detail and variation. Site Characteristics and Background: The project site is part of a property of 160 acres that was formerly developed with the privately owned and operated Empire Lakes Golf Course generally located in the center of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan (the "Specific Plan"). The Specific Plan has an overall area of 347 acres and is generally bound by 4th Street to the south, Milliken Avenue to the east, Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue to the west, and 8th Street and the BNSFIMetrolink rail line to the north. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway (formerly referred to as the Vine). The location of the project site is generally within Placetypes S-21 (Village Neighborhood (VN)) and S-22 E5-6Pg67 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20147 AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925 VAN DAELE HOMES, INC J U LY 3, 2018 Page 2 (Core Living (CL)) of the Specific Plan. It is also partially within the Mixed Use Overlay. The site will have an area of 17.23 acres with a street frontage of about 310 feet along 6th Street. It will be bound on the west by the future, north-south primary street ("The Resort Parkway") of the overall project. Fallowing the construction of that street, tete site will have a frontage along that street of 2,100 feet. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant' Mixed Use Mixed Use Plannin Area 1 2 Vacant (north half of North former private golf Mixed Use Mixed Use (Planning Area 1)2 course South Vacant' Mixed Use Mixed Use (Planning Area 1 2 East Apartment Complex Mixed Use Mixed Use (PlanningArea 6 2 West Vacant' Mixed Use Mixed Use (PlanningArea J)2 M_1 - art of the south half of former private 6alf course;2-Empire Lakes Specific Plan Project Overview: The applicant proposes to subdivide the project site into three (3) parcels and four (4) letter lots and construct 296 single-family residential units as follows: 99 bungalows, 80 townhomes (or "RowTown"), and 117 stacked fiats. The floor area of each unittype will be between 1,464-1,536 square feet(bungalow), 1,503-1,853 square feet (townhome), and 1,296 — 1,798 square feet (stack flats). All of the residential units are for sale: Non-residential.uses are not proposed within this project. The overall density of the project will be about 18.75 units/acre (296115.79 acres). As the project site is within two separate Placetypes within the Specific Plan, it is subject to the density requirements of those Placetypes. The required density ranges for development within Placetypes S- 21 (Village Neighborhood (VN)) and S-22 (Core Living (CL)) are 16-28 du/acre and 18-35 du/acre per Figure 7.6 (page 7-16) of the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan permits various different architectural themes. The applicant has .elected to use"Spanish", "Contemporary", and "Heritage"themes for the bungalows, stack flats, and townhomes, respectively, The number of floors (stories), interpretations of the themes, and floor plans are as follows: Building Type Number of Number Architectural Number of Number of Buildings of Stories Theme Interpretations Floor Plans Bungalow 99 21,2 Spanish 23 3 Townhome 4- lex 7 3 2 4 5- lex 5 3 Heritage 2 3 * 2 reverse 6- lex 1 3 2 3 + 2 reverse 7-plex 3 3 2 3 Stack Flat 13 3 Contemporary 24 5 'Plan-1 is a"carriage unit';'three floors when including the 3"fiooroption for Pian 3;3 not including the V floor option for Plan 3;4 change in color scheme only; E5-6Pg68 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20147 AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925 VAN DAELE HOMES, INC JULY 3, 2018 Page 3 The bungalow residences will be detached, i.e. will not share a building wall with an adjacent residence, similar to a standard two story single-family residence. Unique amongst the other units and building types will be Plan 1 of the bungalows. Excluding the entryway and porch, this unit will be a one floor residence located above a set of garages. The townhome residences will be attached in a row house arrangement consisting of between four (4) to seven (7) two- or three-story units. The stacked flats will be single- floor residences arranged vertically above one another similar to a multi-story apartment. Each of the stacked flat buildings will have a single entrance with.a lobby. Access to all individual units within these buildings will be through interior hallways. Access to the second and third floors will be via shared elevators and interior stairways. The units within the other two building types will have direct, individual entrances. The residential units are generally plotted together according to their typology. The bungalows will be clustered together in 33 sets with 3 units each and located generally along the east side of the project site. The townhomes will be grouped in 16 buildings with between 4 to 7 units each. They will be located generally along the west side of the project near The Resort Parkway and, therefore, will be the dominant building type along The Resort Parkway. The front elevation of most of the buildings along this street will face The Resort Parkway. The stacked flats will be grouped in 13 buildings with 9 units each. These buildings will be located at the north side of the project site in a reverse `L" shaped pattern aroundone of the recreational/community facilities that will be constructed for the overall project. Per Table 7.6 (Parking Standards) of the Specific Plan, residential development of 30 unitslacre or less shall provide parking consistent with the requirements described in Table 17.64.050-1. of the Development Code. The parking requirements for the project are based on the number of bedrooms per unit. The project has 756 parking spaces and is required to have 752 parking spaces. Most of the parking that has been provided to meet the parking requirements for the project will be in the aforementioned garages. Although the remainder will be on-street parking (The Resort Parkway and interior streets) and in unenclosed parking stalls, per Section 7.3.5 — Parking Requirements (page 7-45), all on-site parking and on-street parking count toward a specific project required parking calculation. If all units utilized the maximum square footage options, the project would still have a surplus of 4 parking spaces. Staff Comments: • Architecture — The Specific Plan permits various different architectural themes throughout Empire Lakes/The Resort. The architecture is generally consistent with the intent and vision of the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan lists several standard characteristics that must be incorporated into the various architecture to ensure that the design is consistent with the selected subject theme. The applicant is proposing those characteristics incorporated into three types of architecture, "Spanish", "Contemporary", and `Heritage." During the Pre-Application Review workshop staff recommended that the applicant add more variation and enhancements to reinforce the various architectural themes. Since that workshop, the applicant has made some changes. On the "Spanish" theme, the applicant has added trim to the top of the E5-6Pg69 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20147 AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925 VAN DAELE HOMES, INC JULY 3, 2018 Page 4 parapet walls and around some of the arches. Rafter tails and different color options have also been added. The applicant has added optional details (fireplace, trellis, and outdoor BBQ to the Plan 1 elevations which were bare at the Planning Commission Workshop. The "Heritage" theme has stayed the same as it was proposed at the workshop however, the applicant has now provided elevations of all the different building types. The "Contemporary" theme is also very similar to what was seen at the workshop. However, the color schemes have changed to comply more with the architectural standards within the Specific Plan. Lastly, the applicant has also added windows to all garage doors on all architectural themes. Building plotting — One of the design goals for the overall project is an urban streetscape where the buildings functionally and aesthetically"frame" the streets. The applicant has utilized the street setback standards described in the Specific Plan. The buildings along The Resort Parkway are about 5 to 10 feet from the property line which is within the minimum and maximum range allowed. Building massing and scale — Based on the elevations/rendering provided, the. massing and scale of all the buildings are interesting and provide the required variation to ensure that a functional and aesthetic "frame" of the streets is achieved. Architectural enhancements and treatment are provided in balanced and equal proportion on all elevations. Major Issues: 2 The bungalow elevations are described as "modern Spanish architecture." The proposed architecture includes a stucco exterior finish and some arched doorways and windows. The Specific Plan describes decorative ceramic tile or brick accents as recommended enhancements. No brick or the accents are proposed which is traditionally used to obtain Spanish style elevations. Staff recommends the addition of some brick or tile accents to obtain a more enhanced "Spanish" architectural theme. Secondary Issues: Per the Specific Plan, the "Spanish" theme is required to have concrete "S" tile or barrel tile. Currently, concrete flat tile is proposed. The roofing material should be revised accordingly. Per the Specific Plan, the "Spanish" theme is required to have decorative metal elements. Other than the metal elements of the balcony or window rails, no metal is proposed. Staff recommends the addition of iron elements to further the "Spanish" architectural theme. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required' and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of- sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department, All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department E5--6Pg70 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20147 AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925 VAN DAELE HOMES, INC JULY 3, 2018 Page 5 Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block w211. These wafts shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the nearby buildings. 2. All ground-mounted equipment proposed, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on-center. All ground-mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. Staff Recommendation: Staff is in support of the proposed Tentative Tract map SUBTT20147 and Design Review DRC2017-00925. The proposed project is consistent with the intent and vision of the Specific Plan. Furthermore., it is well-designed and complimentary to the existing adjacent residential/apartment communities to the east and the proposed adjacent residential, single-family communities to the south (within the Specific Plan) that are currently under review by the City. Staff recommends that the Committee accept the proposal as submitted, subject to the resolution of the above-noted major and secondary issues to be verified. by Staff, and forward 'the application with a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Members Present: E5--6Pg7T MEMORANDUM June 25, 2018 To: F rro'rru r 5,ry1,r t.'ar46a/o,, Assistant Planner I"i<rll"'a Anderson Otv ol,Rancho ( arc rrnamaral;�a:r Vice hu:asidelrt, l,nvir r:rrarrac:nta'al I'1�ruanirraa nbjCCt• '1 hL' 'I"PO 2014 7 IN]"'RODIJUVION AND BACKGROUND "saute I)auel ! MMIC, k r°ec;prr Strr'aI;^ cicSe7.,aa R"'VIOW rapal>r'Ov rel llal�7,C2017-00925) sand ap�up��tovL l of ,r I'clrutrrbrve f'r.,o (T.:IAl)(SURI T201.77) l0r lThc Resort (proposed pmra)jectl�, which would rrnlalenlent am prortdrrar eel the, approved Rmilcuhm:r Cucar'aaaa11g',a hKILI,triarl Alva Specific p'lan'e(lASP) IraWr icl�n-od to ars Frnp irc L.rikes) sub-'Arca ty Pl-0lCa (Apl"armed Project) Hlo t.'ity rrl'R ncho 01caruamaraiml yap+[ar,wecl tha':r Iiinpa'ire I,aal es/lA S1" `~prrlr-l4�rczl 18 "S1 ecific Plate's ah,uraa'ndm nt I'rma]�cci wua.d c�^r third alre sras.�ocia tcd Firma Pro"I'min') 1;rua iror°rrraruw laA Irrwp acl P'Cpillvt (EM)p 'on May 2016 (1 Anpirc Lakes Sprcro;the 111mi Arra-a'ralr7rent Funal El R or FMA FIR), Stuutc t.'1em irr7wlrr.rursc, �SUI IP] No 20150-11083), The I'mprlrr Lake"ke" spyxilicr Plan Final FIR was prepared in accordanco with Olo Csdlfatrauiaa I'm ircminent<al Ouaality Act IC"ta,t;) n f°rrlr,fiom rmiaa lInh7ra 7"S'csour,a°es ( r d% ",l'Qctraruws NOM), e,,t Su'(1 ) anm,I tlnc.' "'Swats^ Gui clines (t`aalrprxrmaa ( rad (,)f Regiduoonr s, "Irtle° Irl, Sccticbn°s 15000, c't seq,). The I'.rraprire L.aloes Specific Plan Arneraalrnent is intended to serv°m�, its the parunatr'y ("ravncarrlracrrttal docullliont, fOr,all entitlements aaas�oc;r'alcd aurtla ttl'I'laanninp7 Area I (PAJ) m:al'dw Eniplir-O l,al,c., SI)CCrlie inelrrm.11raa all reralnested of re(jurrred to itnu')I'eronl tlae Specific Phil. PUrsaraant to Scc°lion 15102 ref the t'II.(;A Ouiclefines, taut srahsecIraa°raI FIR rtuaayIse recpr.nred t`ru'e'as projc'ct t.rnk"ss the t.'rty dcnerraaincs, on the Iara,sis of sull,"au,tmrlraul that one azar ItrmtrQ arf,the fAlo in,up c«r0in'0rrr,, aura rne't.: n „"�rtrw c,°° . I�rtecl I'm a IaroJc°c�mt, taws a,ubs'°unlit FIRr"a. When ,ata FIR has h�°en c•c°rill�lecl ol as ec, a a;°a.larr,atrcauu arwlca sha111 he p'rc;p ara�d k�m' tluattl lrrcupeca rrnlc°sS the lead zi,. nc�y dem narnes, on the basis a rl'u'ruhstan.tisal evidene°cr in 11ae hght arl'Ilre whole rc.a°arrcl, one or anwareof ill(.' fall suints: 1 I� Substantial Changes etre proposed ire ilea:IrroJeol "thin:h a,'urill require raraapa.ar rea r`sirrurs of,the l)I'COOLIS I!"Ifd ear rrcy;artiVo declaration clrue to that involvement u,fnm sipinifrcaarrt crnvircrrrnrentaal CITCet esu ur ~,nl,rstaarrtirul increase ire the severity meal'pre.viouusly rsknitiliC(l Si nif—ia:aawrai ¢(Teas, (2) ;"Surl)stuaurtiaal catarrap(es ncwccK�killr rcrspacCt to tlrc,Circ,raraaskarrees torr 'el which the prtwjec;t is undertaken which 'evrll rt°cprrire rnatjnr acvkslons offlIc: Iar'eVj()trs FAR ear' (ICC <rr,trmaa)dUC tol thic inamrly°ernerat of,ne�\ a.rnvismruamrreratol efi' cis or ru s ubslantiLd irac:rni�oa the Scver'ity of'prreuis.ranrs'ly identified signilicaaant ell'ectas„ of ( ') e%v intarrrmatlon (:)f'saolaartaanti•rI rr'rrpuwmrtaanee, avhidi ccaaw, not lcnrr'ccrr and could nett have been Icusurwn with the exercise aaf`roasonaaahle diligence at the time the previous EMIR w,a a certified as Complete or the negative declaration was adopted., shows any ar'I'the fpallrwwiraly': (aa) The pro'jQc, would have one ormore significani el"leas rrtat dir,CLISSCd Ira the lar'ew,icrrs FIR ol.rachatsa e c,cc hllraatinl CA « T:X146 t�l /37'7 „-, F: 714 5t _.. Iso, ta.rff�.."°r?rS � �,�°7f'Yt�r �"rota, ':�"�°��r7a"a" ��ria"tip EXullOwl ""JO I I L E. —6 P'ryry. F G «9 Nikki Cavazos .1a.arrt ?t 201 Ga (b) `*;i,rtnrl caant CiTVc°rss prrc,wvi o usly eTMxaaarrKwd warta d be snTM;wUially mwv :,nvw than Ntaaw n in the larev°Ons 11110, l,e°,1 ylitQM% aaamsuur.cs or altc°m atar es p,wi nisly fsrauwrcl not to fi��asulalcw would nl fact he barsiNn and would snla.wtarrtially rK.°apr.ce one Or narne synitic arut OWN a;rt ties:: la"dea bur We protect Imoparwnerrta, cleclhw to ;rcloprt to inhiy",mion nreamtre or ahenlatww a:°', or (Q lw✓fitiya,artrora rrwaswTs or alterrrcertiw/a.°a "hic:°.h are consitlera;rlaly different 1'rurn those aaruflyzed in t1ru:parcw im" 1-.113 nv ulal sacbstantiaally reduce mic or aaaorc .significaant. CALMS Im we can iicrarrtrc uat, Isia1 We pajoc.t p-rrolar.rnents d c lhrfu to adopt thu, a otig'ation rata°<t;;aruc;a,la'arltc:rnar,tiw-c:. �. oda wstlswrat %vith tlra's re(lUns°oaur;nt, ar1cpiwieh.ra1 p'rra)geaatS rnrrpaler'na nwunya the Spaces. fic; 'Ppunts including tpar, proposed p)aaalcct 1 1'he Wort 1`TN4 20147, ww°r61 be ieviewd to r eterrifine it-they are rrithin drr.� sa:o�pca o the do r°Ir„apairaan arnttc ipa[rteacl and evaluated 'in Hasa 1-iraarl FIR 11 duct irnMc°nwnting pantie t is within the /c:opaa' of the Approval P'aojw and anaaly is unelrrcled W the Hirt, l FFV no acla.htiran,;al ens ikmnrontal mvic", is Tequired Puroaaaant to Won 15 HA of to Slaatcr Q "lQA C.irr delbes. the arndysis prrcscntcd in this doc°urinoirt ceuMates Me prra.aPwod parctw it corral"araa ort to the Approved Project and the a:arawxlysis in Ow p~aaap he 1.+aalwe:s Qcr11c Plama Amcnalnac:nt Final lallt Wr oncah inalauact: c:,Ik,,ory to it'ilic' 1ar-c6oaasa arra alysis �acle•c,pr°mel ;acidro :sscs clic p roposcrcl project. 1140,11,,A:71' D E1 S(A'0�11'11'10 N I l c kinp uc° 1.alsc:°s specific; 1"ltiarrr Aiancnclmew Final I_.11k aatlela'e sed the "nisei operaaarcana:al envircararnentaal unpaacts that would result frol-11 re(kncicrprnow o Hasa )60-stale. Finpairc Lakes (;oll`t`a:aara'sa.' uvuh ar Proposed rraixcd-rrrsc laapch-densis'„a clewelopaaaac.°iat, A uraaawwritutn of3.'50 resrda.ntlal uanpts and 220,W) square Wet (sl”) cap aa+a i Te°sidetuim uses is Vowed by the Apapreaavccl l:'r_cajcn n 1',a" L 1a'.a.cw°atinnWp en space areas and raafiastruc•1me to ,crwca dw aMwowd aaw°s am ako incchodeal. As tuautha described heloww, the cuurrwrtly paraapaa..w,csel pararla'cct int'c hos cora niration and op eraal on or 296 W, We rw id wshl r.anhs in PAd; no non resicicratparl rawc^s are° paaolaosc& `Me parc,aje'ct MW c"ne°or"rgasss apap,rr.xiraawdy 17.2 arc ws aarul is ,rp,owraalla° h;ac°aanad smtlr of tN" Street and c.°vast rrl, p..l'ic Re.sort Parkway lAwinc°rly re`t'e°rre°a,1 to as Ile Vinc h consiestern with the C oncewp,ttwl Dew°calcapmet t Plan for We 1:,rr11m,e 1,arhs Spaccific Plan Ow,Ar to aauo-rc;fiwel 'laarattt v I.Q, ka:rin We BMW hikes} y»pewcllic Plaa q The pa"Yc�,c°t site° is lowed a,wialain Pltrc°c^tvpws SOI p"wripp,ige Na°rp>lrlac.rr-homl [VVI) and _22 (Core Fivinga [CR and partially %w ithin the Nfixed.-Usc Ovcrrlauy. 1"Irc: coarceprtaaaal sire 1aUn shaa host ivehitectaararl themes aar;d e:oncccp°atnarl hnaiscVe pshn in kw proposed p)acajtc~t are attached. As shown, the paropaaased parcaµjed involves three types orloroaale residenlraal trnitsa bungalow (9 9 traits "it a SpaarIkh a arelaateouraal (ha:ara�ae), ta:rwnhconacs (80 units With ar 1lorita gc- ar°ehrtectaaral Merarel, and slacked Hats 0 17 na~rits wtfi't'h ar G,m°onternp orary arra°'panectarsaal thcrnic). The overall density of (he proposed project"fill be a rp"apamx6naateulyr 17.2 ChVellang WAS per UMV lahrNs;my As WWI in the. 1 nap by 1.rarkcs Specific 1°1'kan, the density r<atag;ea pini°d"clopaa wnt "Whin PlaccQpae SO1(VA0 is 16-28 dulacre and 18-38 cln!arc v kw 1""1acetype S-22 CC'lA 13cawd on the proposed cotweprtararl plan, the density or proposed Nsiderrces in p:alaacctrTe 1021 is arohnaated ro he 14.9 do/,'acre. 416s, is sh ghrIs, lower tn-¢aunt _.. . ...... .................. E7 ' r//� l�, �/i//,✓ /r,// f,/��, /,,, ,,/ „ � ,I / � �i / / //� �// �/ / / i 1, /,/ .,�� /, >/ Nil;kr r'araaa os lumre 28, 201,8 Page, ; iderinface mrt the Specific Nan; ho%veve.m, as ide°ntilicd in Wfw:Mrr 7,32, Plaac.`etylre Oescripntionaw, orthe Spaecifua: plan, inwrishy niamy krea o-ansfw rred ha°t aoom prurce°l, proe ided the mariwrrnrnrn ir,,ignmrocd writs are aac'hieked. lic da nshy amf[IT01.10Sed re:Murlenus in Phruetypae• S02 2 rs w.°:mirnwe d to he 22.t dcmramcive Ile pao'ic>d she has been diMtaaw-hexi fir€:°m rea mly c.°unpwlcle.cl rnaass grading opeWoriv tw h St ret borders the she ter the north, mul the,areas to be north, wwvst ,rowel ^;DUah owaa.a aa[SO nnslCA°aslerprCd aMuacl have been naarss oaraucl,.°a.p. FAMrmuad nmmmGti-Nnwily Wdenh,,d uses amen h)caatcad tw,a than Od',t.caf lfi�2 pmr0p10;',u:w1 OAA h1clUde y%plkrrge orr the(leen and Remove at Enapafine s l,a kes. 1Ioess buddinp6M are =tly Nle`wW To pruow,'Mde<a a:onsir,tent AMrral chraraactor rdaa6ve to humbling hetp„lat, the rrrat imwrnrn,arllowod he ylt a rlrpararilclnrpyM to be c•v'nstr•rroeal aelj,wceiat to fire°Ma.° existfmrg rrt:raNepcnces is WIM aa'larmv 'm°M;rund aM�ffWn 20 NorMp'tlro; PAL prt:rrmr)(hIrY, �Sta�cICWICS not mrljare:�nt to k'xJSkra;1t^, re-siclences are hinite d tar as tudXamMtrrM fici htof 60 fc:° ,t ',;o rt'la of 6th Stive't The praarprwed Mtu-erctumets a ouW he 2—to 35vok (aa uuarxnnanrr a;Mfrtprprioxinnately ThEvent and 4-inches has h) mid would nor eaxc.°cnad Ow Mhha,h4ata Sight testrictions. Wthek dw proposed doviop pent ewould w.rranoy ewM the setbacks,s, laattc'ls°rapac° efOfn.aa, and whet e.Qvelop na eiu Mtaatra.l4atds e°Mt.ablisheacf in tht° Spcwc(fu.' Plast to eusture there as as ,u'wnff'6ont buffer i.)eao e ni exiting and ¢mwpxr^ed us" Waahly, aw the Phceyp es 021 and S-22 there is as u�mrmnantruu Nqulred ,acrpknamelw. s:fl' 10 feet front the, eafa,terra praapo:°ityr lino, and ;a Whrrrum IGp-fa.:Rot Mcatlowk nun 6" Met ON Plaacoyrp e w 2._°y, The prerpNmed batilehtacs have aTi mtm0murn snobnc;k ofarpaprroxim alely Mho fm'mn Te caeatan pamp vny houndzvy and aprpsroxarmrely 15-feet front 0'a stte^et. "fie°lrfctrlaar,acce'M.M io the prropram od cicvclrrp-uttmc 1rt rw,arrwld parfmnarrf ly' he Our ftp o IMka,,iNn, aalarnap I he Resort. I"<artarrq% umwhr1mr„ao a.a reniriel-a Nn a in Hie Mmrnthern pacmrtmc.arw Of`tl O AW VChie:culaIramc arr°aSa wea,'aold amlSo hC arvama9a ble bona the p punned f"knit on 60 we.ovarriwrou center pr,ar9 hq,,, area in tprc, norflw,e°°at p•aa;rr�tiOn Oft'he Sue ,incl paan°kfnep would he p rovicled onsitehi conrip hrrnce awhh Ter Spreadfic Nan reepnirerricntM prefer tca We Paar hrig ,ryMae urnent provided in A11aac,hincnl B cMf thdas docrurne ray The p ropmed paqped %Y U Whisla recputgrw,ap In7a yc.lC 1ar11-kmaug 15 hle s/ae°ksy and a accacrtnamclautaons f%aa- f6rUrw.w empecm I'k: VC'hiClaas 6aszr&g sta l mrs; ncr parking lots are imisidud or reynr°ed bw d w prropaaawd paaopect lredestmfaatr praathww,�auys wn,°ertulcl he p:ancavidecl fllrtoughout the hn Tolled development U) plink the rearic9i:¢'rtraaV irses waTh pdaunned praascao and opaear spx~ac,e, aamaaM, the con nrtwaafty reae.r e°tiwti¢:an ce°auto;°u Mld cultumlunutely a,atit'01-galarartred rlcv,dop iridal in PAL lie prww,ns and open space, oveas will provide varmcrmos rarneni.ties for rcr,id. .aataw, pare°Irulrrrt a but mrart lhr1iteal to, a.dog park, gg arne area, open turf'. harrl:rcquea and gale immp, arrtaa sme. pedemrian e°a.Martreethn to the rec,reat.iaaat center aim) wallows rae:cwns to The Imt, which MH be locracd alit in thio exi,,aJnaa tunnel wider 6”' Strcet. C'c:rarwtrncdlicrta of'tprc' Pre'aproaaed prrcrpecl ill e^apr dni to be initwawd in September 2018 and 6,re complete by l a':ecanrkrc:�au 2021, This is gerwernMy° aa,°ixlaun tfineu cm.aunrueattimata tin u nba me tsar-nerd in the Fbiaal FIR For aarpalcnrc�urisatiMan of tile Spe6hc Phan a ler,eloprnrerrl south of 6" Met (Phase 1) (est.inuarted to he phrmra 2017 to the sp 6rig of:?0211 aarrcp '<aitpan the overall tinreaGrune in coaaMlntedon in PAI of dn! Finpire lakes Spaae6fic Pl n (th"wigh sprung 2024). 1 ile con;snuction-rcrNtad arnakyais prmsenwd in the Find IAR assumed that there wwrr,rld be up to 6 [wavy uncle Lips prey day charnrg tins We 1 girachuag prhase. O mwd on the estunaated aunrount ofearthwork'), and wapnp,meMxtmraattcly 100 truck lmlrM (50 Irearrfy^ trarnkc tripr,l prn day cGawtnf.,the period crf"ti rate when hrafkclfrr„_ Utility and pr;anrraerit conssuction act%ks fart.Phase I ovu'lapr The finish gnadinpz required fol tile p"aMPUSed paropcct Will occarr over a hrinited prea"iod of We (aaprprrominaaately 3 rumc'rnths) mand vneatrld not rc^cpm c lnrprcrn or ex,pon ofmoils oufnide ofPAL A Invited amount a:rf`sod (arprpaAxinramteiy l,m)oo cubic yarr(.IM) are: e;xpe^ctcd to be transported to odwr areas ira anaal to tha PAL heiefore, there would he nca heavy truck lips on the local roardwva;aw„M a ssocp,aled nth Wish +,r-dims aactfa his. Theare° would he he ;ra-`y fraud trips r's'.ovarvr�:�s E5-6Pga4 ro,r/� �i,;/ ��//, /o/ �/,,,/;�// r, .✓/r/,J/�r,ii / ii/.//rr l� l,,//,,,/� //r,r✓/ /i,� O��,i /r//r / / � �/ r,//i//,,;, / /� i„r / /// / //� /, We rW <rW, Page-4 rw'�err_lualr ra. ww'dtla other caatawnuctican aachviticx W the inalrarrt ertrarswtewakits, concrew. elc. (e,thraarted to he «appar au.xrnaaaterly ,w;-1 tl Lrawy lrQs per Q& heaww°e,vc°o the nunakaer of heavy Urrck drips Or the: paraap(x;wf paraajcc B wwt,n dcd be sa nla&eo wrn;all frowen or c:ohn°ud red 50 heavy Wucks on as daily kids, \yfith respect to colal,trnt;trcrn equipment- the c;our;wlraiartiaaryrelamed anaalyr,is prtesentcxl in the l rnaal FL a"a,,*trroudcal cm w:rlCr'e,lat arc:"taw r% im '%;tM kus l0.ea"datU n" within lrAl (e.g., slurs grading and lrr4& G"rl dirtga[, and p7laat-t!,aiBdOg hcdkftnl! c'w7aretaare`t on, lnswHaaldorl of 4r'kht,y nalr"aSn'1laalUiC', p 'lving and �archrtccttrr"al cmaatnau;�r+l,. (,'carr,aslent avilh thea c cansh—nc�ticadl qac°lk itic,s evarin<rlec.f in Ilse Final L]R, Construction rrd`tha.�, paloposeal ucashicrttaal uses aW dlMvuiv'e:' hiraO prrraln& patridepdng conmauclion. Itlility n1sl aliartiearl„ paving and dark,hitaactemd coming,;, aand tharT wvill be uver'lqlpring conA cac hon WOW o caring wvANn PAL The lwtss lu ading 'rctix itics, vvlriciu use larger ecpuitrrraent (canal sacan<mn: higher aair quality eirli sic.rns and ncar:we) WT bun c orapaleted 10 ninilor and type ertvonwnwdiean ccltudllnutnt lad ho ar,e:al ;:at the paraalc c:t she wrU c aaro on at dally buds Howwc.°avk weTh We a:eadr'agal55ra of rn= grading act aol s and wa.wrrcac°iarEcal craw&cllwdve use: Of"ltrrr?o.^r equipment at ihic, p n:a uxl sho the nava mage arl°aout'ion orcottstr°rrc.lon c°r,.lnilata nut, to be used aarr ar daily hasi� dear �r�c.°rrrdaini�a�9r. a,aarr;�;tN aga.trca�to aac°il0in.'s %vor.rlal not exc a:al ¢hart aria ulrrcd in tlacy Final I°"'I amdy°„is for ostirB' uilrU' n'luxdn"dadnr cnuisla,r4rn:s. l"hcgc, ,u-c, cul-rently no dwelling urndts that have, been devchipaPod Whin i"rAl, W should Lrlso low ludeap that to chat,° timry h ve l°leen arta lar occt.s aul'dlann ee.l ingrarthwing aalk"e el irl P M. Tlr: par w poscd 296 uratic would Klude p to 4 be l cmins, and twmruicl her vvc°II wvithm We maaxin�n"n narr7ulrer of units callc.drwed by dw 5,pa,da,rll L'km Irapa o 3A50 d.rrritlswY Based can Ow laacpalrlaatW ,pa:rrc°raa% factor tr.Ned hi tho Final MR (104 de;xla,lows put urik.; the pa laa sNI party pc;w weaerurlcd tr;e°cdecr aale. a pproxinrartely 9tl() rc-sielent,s which Would also be within die e°ratin°tmed lacapaarlartien l:naaala anwicipartcd in PAI (up to 10,418 rraddelrtsy Thelar•arlrca.,arCl. lraf:aaal cicaws cleat irn:incic:any dre:rn-rosidemicl dc%c5prnlcl-li and %voula [lot yeWncr atc ncw crnpdaryc%s. C'arr:aurant to `t,,,c tion 1 5168(c°)(.l) of the l"aalutArrrin f:`nvit-snuouerrtal Quality A l t('l:QA) Guidelines. -lathe ;Wawy Wk that p msuaarat to Scohm 14161 110 U%V efteCIs ea+n6cl Uc,calt°Or 110 neAw uratip.,ntlon rne<asures cr caarlrl Vire r-Capaaat-C1, drew aa.,Esc nc'y call pap rcc 'ca the ,Ictiw ily auaa lrein„", ~s h1lin thc° scopac rat the pau'ojocct cove'reel by Ow parayr`aalru l UZ. am! no new cinw'rraenn�rculml alcacnrrlan wec'r'trld be ivc, fired " With regard to ""pe°cliern 15 162 4 tlw ('L'ltw A t l kkline°s: 1�hc laaeapaarsed prryco ckxs not preapac,we rward`rxtanuti,rl c'haangcww wvhrc h wdj lvgtlirc rtrarlcar rcrvisions tc,a the Frnfadre. Lahs Specific Plan Amcllclntc:'nt Firraal F]R due to the invnlwernent of'°ne” AWAIVrcarrat envircar�rrnentan Whos or as s ubstaadatiaal dnc.°resaawe in thc, severil} o previously identified signillciant e°tdcci�s; 2. a :sada^atcarrliaal c luongn We ara:c:tu-Nd ww kh aw spaect to the dr°c:nnaxttanc es under wvhtid; the lamarwd patcoect ds +inert ak,en which will require ntatiearr iewfi lions to the l.:nnp°lire Lakes Specific Annsnc.lnaent lima Ilk due to the involvell-r ant of ne),v S'ignificont. envirc.annac;t ra) efficts or a sub traratrarl increase in the severity of ineviaarsfy Wntitiea.l ;,igninc rnt cfRcK and I No new Wirr-rnattic,n ofsulastrantral nnp OrtalrCe kv,N tc:Rind thaat racaulcl: (ar) create no" significant effects; Qhl iracnen e me swcwky a af'pre.°viously c°xailnirrcd effects; (e) d(cncrndlle that n-uitigaat.icaad nrecasw-es or aahm-nwives pare°wrocau sb, round m to be Lcaawihle %waa.uicl V hunt be teaa,sihle: or(d) intra)duce rnhigaatican naeanstHes ear-salternwives that are crcandder;ahly di-lbc+rat f'rcmi dune rrnarlyv,xi in the Emp tie Lakes Specific Man Anrc:nalanent Final p 'Llt that awaeaduh:l rC Cue,,, significant irnpract �, d",r�ra'uru�w E 61 75 1`Jrkki Cavazos Ir1rBeMtMl Page 5 In raa a un¢- mwe "Ah sa.t'kris 15162 and 15 168 of the SM (TOA Gi.vi la°Idran, whi based carr Te analysis IardwscrrtaM in this rlocurraem at is a,°r+rrc1r.rded that d°amr mrrrctrarn and ddpc°mtrdxn tarot"the lain«rlatmmi lmr«j,::°cr AM) M) inilslr;rnents the pre0ously arlrIarsrvcd lwnil'drre Eakes pecnd'Ic I'Irrru �r�rmt°rarlraae°rrt, tixcruW Not result in Ctna aradrrralenlA ck cm Oma as Uv nm emrarried in the f=;rralmAc Lakes peed: Plan Aurooaa.lrrac.m 1 1A h"r.r,warmn IAR, The Itrs7pm d.l project was a dalcrtrMy r::dmwMwcc,.cl by Me evralrrrr ort and rrritigmi mrr rr'aeastrres in thu I'arA FIR, No xri.9cllrional Cl�QA doc'urrrrmNntiaarr is rc;qarded, }r 11�' F,d�dJE,ll;) +VG>n:71f11dlrt tl.v�rla,�a;;u aF C,9r ivu P�f,;�h lr3�I �r>, 5-6P, 7 Me�:rohnk San B��rnivdiino Une . .......... Flocku,A '"IM"MR MY 5, Metrf,)hrfl,,, Rancho Cucarnoinga W1 Staflon N-12 mks L, m ymbfiWw M,IMAC S, N,l I N,4 4 "k CL 14 UN 1p N lZ k ......... h t 1'012 N-6 VNE"Ol A�4 �36 D(AII,C Ji P,I 01, North Urban Pkaza FI M 201,17 Ir c)j e t S i t K �`Wklw Sout h CL 4 54 Al 11 i�35 DAIPIIAII�` "rb r�ie i a� S, 5 pi Ifi 0 W11 V Ny VN piaolylp rW YIP Ix jai MAU, hi i N,-i P F ,idi ootiild'�j, C o L iv n q K ViO 00 wa )vo ri-i pi r e a kes MM E -6Pg77 6Rrkr� tl�ti�ir `lex ui u�fl'ti Ilz f vti v'uJ o:x,r A ' C3 To evn 1)rr yrti o!.. I" A LI�� rt urr F,4 ,e.a.k 'b C'fw�w C� ar�i..irr��ar'�Fy "e C"fe as ,i A4 V vq �a r , 4 , � e , II m I�;;w b,�„anotwin f„r�i un 14 k t r)n,I i fA a ✓ C �1 Iii a 2ig pa Cf 1 Ir1�4 �'ry 17 ��, '� '�J >y' /"`�:� l✓� F a� i�r raj �w %' Ni ��," d ; � v>• �p' va 441 goo ANN VAN DAEL.E HOMES r, �1��l�li'�� any,�1�� r �� ,� r i ,;.of✓ ✓ra '� _:m,�-,ra m ��^�o � mm '� �a F v v < �� 'H r M ✓ "� �, A"� I"y�7 '4 d �u yep �"�IJ e � � v ,� �. �'„ � �bd' t r �N'%,.,J'1"✓V�9wvp�'"�1'IY,�I�Cf"✓nn✓ryy�9„�1�'�,��✓`¢r117Tr�� wf r.„�r�u" ' 5— P7 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS FOR PROJECT WITH PREVIOUSLY CERTIFIED PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The following analysis addresses the potential impacts from The Resort-Tentative Tract(TTM)20147 (proposed project) in relation to the analysis presented in the Empire LakesAndustrial Area Specific Platt (IASP)Sulo Area 18 Specific Platt Amendment Project Final Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) certified in May 2016 (Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR or Final EIR) (State Clearinghouse[SCH] No. 2015041083). The discussion below is formatted to address cath of the thresholds addressed in the Final EIR,and the thresholds that were addressed in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR. It should be noted that, consistent with the conclusions in the Initial Shady,there are no agricultural, forestry or mineral resources located in Planning Area(PA) I of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan area, including the project site,and no further discussion of the topical issues is provided. Applicable Project Design Features(PDFs),Regulatory Requirements (RRs), and Mitigation Measures (MMs) from the.Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR are incorporated into the proposed project, some of which are specifically referenced below. 1.0 AESTHETICS Threshold].] YVould the project have a substantial a dverse effect on a scenic vista? The proposed project involves the development of 296 residential units within PAI of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan area south of 6'h Street and east of the The Resort Parkway, and complies with the development standards in the Empire Lakes Specific Plan and the Design Concept for view corridors, including along The Resort Parkway(referred to previously as the Vine). Consistent with the approved Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amedment project(Approved Project) and the analysis in the Final EIR, due to the proposed project's location in the southern area of the City and the lack of scenic resources in the immediate area, the proposed development will not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic resource. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project. Threshold].2 TVottld the project substantially degrade the evisting visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? The types and methods of construction activities for the proposed,project are consistent with those identified and evaluated in the Final EIR. Construction staging will be located as far as possible from residential neighborhoods east of the project site, and perimeter screening will be installed around the project site,which will obstruct views of ongoing construction activities from adjacent ground level vantage points (PDF 1-2). Trees previously located at the project site have been removed and mass grading has been completed.As presented in the building elevations and site plan in the Project Description,the proposed project complies with the development standards and design guidelines (architectural and landscape)identified in the Specific Plan, including height restrictions (refer to PDF 1-1) and will create a visually cohesive urban community. Consistent with the conclusions in the Final EIR, the proposed project will not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings during construction or operation resulting in a less than significant impact.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. 1 l;5-6Pg80 Threshold 1.3 Wottltl the project cretrte a tieuv sortr•ce of substantial light or glare which wottlrl adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The types and methods of construction activities for the proposed project are consistent with those identified and evaluated in the Final EIR. Construction staging will be located as far as possible from residential neighborhoods east of the project site, and temporary nighttime lighting will face downward and be shielded to minimize broadcasting light into the sky and lighting intrusion into adjacent neighborhoods (refer to MM 1-1). A lighting plan and photometric analysis has been prepared for the proposed project to demonstrate compliance with the lighting design requirements outlined in the Specific Plan and to ensure that proposed lighting does not spill over into adjacent uses. Further,the proposed building materials adhere to the architectural and landscape development standards and design guidelines outlined in the Specific Plan and ensure that these materials will not result in potential glare impacts. Consistent with the conclusions in the Final EIR, the proposed project will not create a new source of substantial light or glare which will adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area during construction or operation.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? The proposed project is located in PAI of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan area and,consistent with the analysis presented in the Initial Study of the Draft EIR, is not within the viewshed of a state scenic highway.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project, 2.0 AIR QUALITY Threshold 2.1 Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air Anality plan? The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in a significant and unavoidable conflict with the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) due to long--term emissions of nonattaimnent pollutants exceeding SCAQMD significance thresholds and project trip generation substantially greater than trip generation anticipated in the City's General Plan for PAI. The proposed project involves the development of 296 residential units within PAI south of 6'u'Street and east of the The Resort Parkway. To date, no other residentials units have been developed in PAI and up to 3,450 units were approved. Based on the population generation factor used in the Final EIR(3.04 residents per dwelling unit),the proposed project will generate approximately 900 new residents in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, compared to up to 10,488 new residents assumed in the Final EIR. The proposed project is consistent with the Approved Project,will not generate new population or vehicular trips beyond those anticipated in the Final EIR, and incorporates applicable Final EIR RRs and MMs discussed in the analysis below. Therefore,no new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR. The SCAQMD adopted the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan(AQMP) in March 2017. The 2016 AQMP incorporates the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) latest growth forecasts as presented in the SCAG 2016-2040 Regional Transportation P1anlSustainable Communities Strategy (2016-2040 RTP/SCS).These updated growth projections include the growth that will occur from implementation of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, including the proposed project. 2 E5-6Pg81 Threshold Z.2 Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an e fisting or projected air quality violation? Construction-RelatedImpacts Maximum daily construction air pollutant emissions were estimated in the Final EIR to compare with limits (thresholds) established by the SCAQMD.Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx)were determined to -be potentially significant; the maximum average daily NOx emissions were estimated to be '128 pounds per day, compared with the SCAQMD threshold of 100 pounds per day.Emissions of all other pollutants were determined to be well below the SCAQMD thresholds. The Final EIR concluded that with incorporation of RRs and MMs,regional and local construction emissions from the Approved Project, including NOx emissions,would be less than significant. The limiting pollutant for construction activities is NOx because emissions of all other pollutants were detenninedto be well below the SCAQMD thresholds.The Final EIR analysis concludes that with implementation of MM 2-1, which requires that all"off-road diesel-powered construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower(lip) shall meet Tier 3 off-road emissions standards,"the maximum average daily NOx emissions would be 91 pounds per day, compared with the SCAQMD threshold of 100 pounds per day. The proposed project incorporates MM 2-1,which will also reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC),respirable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less(PM 10), and fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5); RR 2-1 and RR 2-2, which will reduce f igive dust emissions (PM 10 and PM 2.5); and MM 2-2,which includes constriction-related measures to further reduce criteria pollutant emissions. As identified in the Project Description, the Final ETR analysis scenario of maximum emissions assumed concurrent activities at various locations within PAI. Construction of the proposed project will involve the use of the same types of construction equipment assumed in the Final EIR and in compliance with the identified RRs and MMs. Because the mass grading activities for the project site have been completed, the construction activities for the proposed project will not overlap with mass grading,which was the basis for the maximum average emissions analysis in the Final EIR.The type and amount of equipment to be used during remaining constniction activities for the proposed project will vary on a daily basis;within the average maximums set forth in the Final EIR. Additionally, it is important to note that with the completion of mass grading activities and elimination of the substantially higher daily emissions occurring during mass grading due to the use of larger equipment, additional pieces of smaller equipment on any given day may be operated without concern for approaching the SCAQMD NOx emissions threshold. As an example, post-grading building site equipment used in the EIR scenario—at each site— includes 1 crane(226 hp), 3 forklifts (89 hp), 1 generator(84 hp),3 tractorlloader/backhoes (97 hp), I welder(46 hp), and 2 "other"equipment(171 lip)'. It is noted that one of the"other"equipment may be a grader, smaller excavator, or similar used for finish grading or utility trenching at a building site. Because mass grading will not occur concurrently with building activity at the project site,the following equipment that was analyzed in the EIR analysis scenario of maximum emissions will not be operating: 2 excavators (162 hp), I grader(171 hp), 1 dozer(255 hp),2 scrapers (361 hp), and 2 tractorlloader/backhoes (97 hp). Further, the estimated daily heavy truck trips (approximately 10)will be less than the assumed in the Final EIR analysis (50 per day).Therefore,the equipment and truck emissions from daily construction activities will not exceed that estimated in the air quality analysis presented in the Final EIR.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. The horsepower data are those specified in the OMEEMod emissions model and represent averages for actual equipment that would be found on site. 3 E5-6pg82 Operational Emissions Even with incorporation of Final EIR MM 2-3 through MM 276, long-term operational regional emissions of ozone (03)precursors (VOC and NOx), carbon monoxide (CO),PM 10, and PM2.5 due to mobile and consumer product sources from the Approved Project were determined to be significant and unavoidable. The proposed project implements the Approved Project with the development of 296 of the approved up to 3,450 units within PAI, and associated open space amenities.To date,no units have been developed in PAI.The proposed project incorporates or will otherwise comply with Final EIR RR 2-4 (no wood burning stoves will be installed); RR 2-5 (the provision of bicycle parking);RR 2-6(compliance with odor,particulate matter, and air containment standards); and, MM 2-4(provision for electric vehicles and alternative-fueled vehicles and bicyle parking). As discussed in Section 13 of this evaluation, the proposed project is generally consistent with the development assumptions for Placetypes 5-21 and S-22 contained in the Final EIR.and supporting Traffic Impact Analysis; the only difference is the slight density changes. However, as concluded in the Traffic Analysis, it is estimated that.the trip generation for the proposed project will be consistent with and possibly less than that assumed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project(forPlacetypes 5-21 and 5-22). Additionally, the proposed residential uses and open space/recreational amenities and associated operations will be consistent with that anticipated in the.Final EIR.Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved`Project. Threshold 2.3 Wotild the project restilt iti a ctturrtilatively considei-able net iitcirease of rtity criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non-attainment ander air applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant cumulative regional and local construction emissions with the incorporation of MM 2-1 and MM 2-2. It was also concluded that the Approved Project would result in significant and unavoidable cumulative long-term regional emissions of 03 precursors (VOC and NOX),PM10, and PM2.5, all nonattaintnent pollutants, due to mobile and consumer products sources. As discussed above,the proposed.project incorporates applicable Final EIR RRs and MMs, is consistent with the construction-related and operational aspects of the Approved Project, and is consistent with the analysis assumptions used for the analyses in the Final EIR. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe cumulative impacts related to constriction and operation of the proposed residential uses and open space amenities will result. Threshold 2.4 Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in a less than significant impact related to(1) off-site CO hotspots, (2)exposure of persons to construction and operational phase criteria pollutants,,(3) exposure of persons to construction and operational phase,toxic air contaminants (TACs) generated on site,and(4)TAC on-site impacts from off-site warehouse/distribution center and train operations. Existing sensitive receptors in proximity to the proposed project are the residential uses adjacent to and east of the project site; these residential uses were identified in the Final EIR and potential exposure of residences to pollutants were addressed. As identified above, the Traffic Analysis for the proposed project concludes that the trip generation for the proposed project will be consistent with and possibly less than that assumed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.The proposed project will not increase average vehicle delay at any intersection beyond that anticipated in the Final EIR. Therefore,the proposed project will not result in the creation of a CO hot spot, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. 4 E5-6Pg83 As discussed in the Project Description, the constriction activities associated with the proposed project (e.g., number of truck trips, the type of construction equipment, and the type of construction activities) will not exceed the construction assumptions that were the basis for the analysis in the Final EIR. Therefore, construction activities for the proposed project will not expose off-site receptors to significant criteria pollutant emissions and the impact will be less than significant. Further,toxic air contaminant (TAC) emissions during constriction will also be less than significant. The proposed residental uses and associated open space amenities, which are consistent with the uses' assumed in the Final EIR,will not involve any uses or operations that will generate TACs. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial cumber ofpeople? The Initial Study prepared for the Draft EIR concluded that construction-related odors associated with the Approved Project would be short-teen, would not affect a substantial number of people, and would be less than significant. It also concluded that odors front operation of proposed uses would be no different than in surrounding development,would not be considered objectionable,and would be less than significant.The proposed residential uses and associated open space amenities"will not involve any construction activities, uses, or activities that were not anticipated for the Approved Project and analyzed in the Final EIR. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result from the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. I 3.0 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Threshold 3.1 Would the project leave a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modification, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S Fish and!Wildlife Service? The Final EIR concluded that that PAI did not support native plant communities and did not provide suitable habitat for sensitive biological resources.As shown on the Conceptual Development Plan by Placetype presented in the Project Description of this document, the physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within PAT and does not include any areas that were not part of the Approved Project development area analyzed in the Final EIR.The project site has been mass graded and vegetation previously found at the site(including trees) has been removed in accordance with permits issued by the City. Therefore, the project site does not provide habitat for species identified as a candidate,sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service(USFWS).No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 3.2 Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural comrnetnity identified in local or regional plans,policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Threshold 3.3 Woulrl the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean !Pater Act(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,filling, hydrological interruption,or other means? The Final EIR concluded that that there were no wetlands,riparian habitat,sensitive natural:communities, or areas under the jurisdiction of the CDFW,U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),USFWS, or 5 E5-6Pg84 i Regional Water Quality Control Board(RWQCB) located within PAI, including the previous artificial ponds associated with the golf course.The physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within PAI and does not include any areas that were not part of the Approved Project development area analyzed in the Final EIR. The project site has been mass graded and the artificial ponds and vegetation previously found at the site have been removed in accordance with permits issued by the City. Therefore, the project site does not include wetlands, riparian habitat,sensitive natural communities, or areas under the jurisdiction of the CDFW, USACE, USFWS or RWQCB.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 3.4 IVotrlrl the project interfere substantially with the nrovenrent of any rzrrtive resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or fnigratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? The Final EIR concluded that redevelopment of the previous Empire Laces Golf Course would not affect regional movement through the Inland Empire or within the south coast region, and would not disrupt or adversely affect terrestrial wildlife species movement due to the lack of connectivity with open space areas. it was also concluded the removal of art!ficial ponds at the golf course would have a less than significant impact to migrating waterfowl and avian species. The Final EIR identified that vegetation and trees throughout the golf course had the potential to provide nesting opportunities for various birds and raptor species but compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code,which protect nesting birds and raptors (refer to RR 3-1 and RR 3-2)would ensure that impacts to nesting birds and raptors are less than significant. The vegetation and trees located at the project site have been removed and mass grading activities have been completed. Construction of the proposed project,which is located entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR,will not involve any activities with the potential to disrupt nesting birds or raptor species. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 3.5 Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Trees previously located within PAI,as identified in the Final EIR,have been removed in accordance with required tree removal permits issued by the City. There are no trees currently located on the project site and the proposed project will not conflict with the City's tree protection policies outlined in the City's Development (i.e., Chapter 17.80,Tree Preservation,and Section 17.16.80).No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Would the project conflict with the provisions of air adoptee!Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR,the City of Rancho Cucamonga is not located within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan;Natural Communities Conservation Plan; or other approved local,regional, or State habitat conservation plan area. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project will not conflict with the provisions of an adopted plan. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. 6 E5-6Pg85 4.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES Threshold 4.1 Would the project eatise a sribstantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in Section 15064.5? The Final EIR concluded that although not anticipated, there was a potential for discovery of previously unknown archaeological resources during deeper excavation activities in native sediment. Potential impacts were determined to be less than significant with implementation of identified mitigation measures,which identify actions to be taken if resources are discovered(refer to MM 4-1 and MM 4-2). Mass grading activities for the Approved Project in the area south of 6"'Street, including the project site, have been completed and no archaeological resources were discovered. It should be noted that, as with the Approved Project,the provisions of Assembly Bill(AB) 52 are not applicable to the proposed project. AB 52 is applicable to projects that have a Notice of Preparation (NOP) or a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration filed on or after July 1,2015; the NOP for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR was-distributed in April 2015, AB 52 establishes a consultation process with California Native American tribes, and establishes Tribal Cultural Resources as a new class of resources to be considered in the determination of project impacts and mitigation. AS 52 requires lead agencies to provide notice to tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project, if they have requested such notice in writing. While project notification pursuant to AB 52 is not required for the proposed project, it is important to note that coordination with Native American tribes was conducted during preparation of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment EIR(refer to Section 4.4, Cultural Resources, of the Draft EIR).The required mitigation measures will also protect unknown tribal cultural resources should they be present at the project site; no tribal cultural resources were encountered during mass grading activities. Therefore, construction of the proposed project,which is located entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR, will not impact archaeological or tribal cultural resources.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation.of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 4.2 Woiild the project directly or•indirectly destroy a irnigrie paleontological i-esoturce or site or unique geologic feature? The Final EIR concluded that although not anticipated,there was a potential,for discovery of previously unknown paleontological resources during deeper excavation activities in native sediment.Potential impacts were determined to be less than significant with implementation of identified mitigation measures, which identify actions to be taken if.resources are discovered(refer to MM 4-1,MM 4-2 and MM 4-3). Mass grading activities for the Approved Project in the area south of Ch Street, including the project site;have been completed and no paleontological resources were discovered.Therefore, constriction of the proposed project,which is located entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR,will not impact paleontological resources.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 4.3 Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? The Final EIR identifies that it is unlikely human remains would be encountered during construction of the Approved Project,,and with adherence to State regulations (i.e., Sections 7050.5-7055 of the California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code), impacts would be less than significant in the event human remains are discovered.Mass grading activities for the Approved Project in the area south of 6`h Street, including the project site, have been completed 7 E5-6Pg86 and no human remains were discovered.Therefore, constriction of the proposed project,which is located entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR,will not impact human remains. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final ETR for the Approved Project. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, no historic resources were identified in PAI and no impact to historic resources would result from implementation of the Approved Project. The physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR. No historic resources exist on the project site, which has been mass graded.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. 5.0 GEOLOGY AND SOILS Thresholds 5.1 and 5.2 Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, inchiding the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: (i)Strong seismic ground shaking, or (ii)Seismic-related groiuid failure, including liquefaction The physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within the impact area addressed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project and there have been no changes related to seismicity or local geologic conditions.Additionally, there are no proposed changes to the type of land uses to be developed at the project site. Consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR, due to site conditions (groundwater depth at 350 feet or more below the ground surface),the potential for seismic-related ground failure from liquefaction will be low,resulting in a less than significant impact. However,.as with the:Approved Project, the proposed project will expose people and stnictures to geotechnical hazards associated with seismic ground shaking and potential geology and soils impacts will be the same. Mass grading of the project site has been completed in accordance with the recommendations outlined in the Geotechnical Feasibility Study(refer to RR 5-2 and MM 5-1); applicable portions of the California Building Code, and/or applicable City ordinances (refer to RRs 5-1 and 5-2); and,recommendations identified in supplemental project-specific geotechnical investigations (refer to MM 5-1).The proposed project will also be constructed in accordance with the identified recommendations resulting in a less than significant impact, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 5.3 Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Mass grading activities at the project site have been completed and were conducted in accordance with applicable requirements identified in the Final EIR and subsequent site-specific geotechnical investigations. Proposed construction activities for the proposed project will be consistent with those identified and analyzed in the Final EIR,will occur within the physical impact area for the Approved Project, and will also be conducted in accordance with applicable requirements. As identified in the Final EIR,the project site is located in a soil erosion hazard area, and there is potential for soil erosion during construction.However,this impact is less than significant with adherence to local and state regulations developed to limit fugitive dust and erosion into surface waters. Chapter 17.66.060 of the City's Development Code requires development projects to comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District requirements for control of fugitive dust(refer to RR 2-1 and RR 5-3). 8 E5-6Pg87 i Further, construction activities will be conducted in adherence to applicable local and state water quality requirements, including implementation of erosion-control Best Management Practices (BMPs) outlined in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting requirements (refer to RR 8-3). As concluded in the Final EIR, once the proposed project is operational, the potential for soil erosion via wind and water will be minimized through the introduction of development, including roads, buildings, paved areas, and landscaping. Landscaping will be installed in accordance with requirements in the City's Development Code to control soils erosion, among other purposes (refer to RR 5-4).No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final ETR for the Approved Project. Threshold 5.4 6Yould the project be located on a geologic runt or sail that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, rued potentially result ill onsite or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft ETR and the Final EIR, PAT, which includes the project site, is not in an area subject to landslides or liquefaction. The physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within the impact area addressed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project and there have been no changes related to seismicity or local geologic conditions. Additionally,there are no proposed changes to the type of land uses to be developed at the project site.As required by MM 5-1,site-specific geotechnical investigations have been prepared for the proposed project. The proposed project will be exposed to the same geotechnical issues related to unstable soils as the Approved Project and will be constructed in accordance with the recommendations from applicable geotechnical investigations. Further,unsuitable soils were removed during mass gradin; activities.Therefore,potential impacts related to unstable soil are less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 5.5 Would the project be located ono expansive soil, as defrnled ill Table 181 B of the Uniforms Building Cade (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? The physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR. Supplemental geotechnical investigations conducted pursuant to MM 5-1 confirmed that the onsite soils have a very low potential for expansion.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final ETR for the Approved Project. Would the project expose people or structures topotential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: • Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated oar the most recent Alflnrist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based oil other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) • Landslides? - As identified in the•Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI is not within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone and no active or potentially active faults are known to exist. The physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR; therefore, no impacts related to rupture of a 9 E5--6Pg88 known earthquake fault will result. Also, the low relief of the site and surrounding area precludes the potential for landslides.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. Would theproject have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative. waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Consistent with the conclusions of the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR,the proposed project will connect to existing sewer lines and treatment facilities, and septic tanks or an alternative wastewater disposal system will not be utilized.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. 6.0 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Threshold 6.1 Would the project gerrer ate greerrhotrse gas errrissions, either tlir•ectly or•irrdit•ectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? The proposed project implements the Approved Project with the development of 296 of the assumed up to 3,450 residential units within PAI, and associated open space amenities. To date, no units have been developed in PAI. The proposed project incorporates or will otherwise comply with Final EIR RR 6-1 (adherence to Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards);RRs 6-2 and 6-4(adherence to applicable California Green Building Standards including as designated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga Green Building Compliance Matrices); RR 6-3 (installation of recycled water systems); RR 2-4 (no wood burning stoves will be installed); and PDF 6-1 (tree planting).As discussed in Section 13 of this evaluation, the proposed project is generally consistent with the development assumptions for Placetypes S-2I and 5-22 contained in the Final EIR and supporting Traffic Impact Analysis; the only difference is the slight density changes. However, as concluded in the Traffic Analysis, it is estimated that the trip generation for the proposed project will be consistent with and possibly less than that assumed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project(for Placetypes 5-21 and 5-22). The proposed residential uses and open space amenities and associated operations will be consistent with that anticipated in the Final EIR. Further, as discussed in the Project Description, the construction methods and equipment will be similar to that anticipated in the Final EIR.Therefore, the estimated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from operation of the proposed project and constnrction activities (amortized over 30-years)would not exceed the GHG emissions assumed for the Approved Project and will be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 6.2 Would the conflict with an applicable plan,policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions ofgreenhouse gas emissions? The proposed project implements the Approved Project and does not involve any changes to the type or amount of allowed land uses, or the amount of GHG emissions that would be generated during construction and operation. Specifically, the proposed project involves development of 296 of the assumed up to 3,450 residential units within AAI. Consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR, the proposed project will notcon#lict.with applicable plans, policies or regulations adopted for the purposes of reducing GHG emissions, including,but not limited to, the SCAG RTCISCS and the San Bernardino Association of Governments(SANBAG) GHG Reduction Plan.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. 10 E5-6Pg89 7.0 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Threshold 71 Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or•the envir•olinrent tliror(gla the routine transport, rise, or disposal of hazardous materials? The proposed project does not involve any changes to the type of land uses or number of residential units to be developed as part of the Approved Project in PAI. Therefore, compared to the Approved Project, there will be no change in the types hazard materials that will be used during construction and operation of the proposed project. As with the Approved Project, through compliance with existing applicable hazardous materials regulations(e.g., Hazardous Material Transportation Act, the Resource.Conservation and Recovery Act [RCRA], the California Hazardous Waste Control Act, and the California Accidental Release Prevention Program included as RR 7-1 and RR 7-2 in the Final EIR), the proposed project will not create a significant hazard to thepublic or the environment through the routine transport, storage,use, or disposal of hazardous materials. This impact will be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final E[R for the Approved Project. Threshold 7.2 Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the ern,ironment? The physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within the impact area addressed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. The previous golf course use and hazardous materials used for golf course operations have been removed and the project site has been mass graded. Consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR, the previous use of hazardous inaterials at the project site or in the vicinity will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The proposed project implements the Approved Project and construction activities and operations will be consistent with that addressed in the Final EIR. Consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR,construction and operation of the proposed project will involve the use of hazardous materials that are typically associated with an urban environment. These materials will be transported,used,stored, and disposed of in compliance with applicable regulations and will not create a significant hazard to the public or environment through reasonably foreseeable upset or accident conditions. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project, Threshold 7.3 For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopter!, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or people residing or working in the project area? The Los Angeles/Ontario International Airport is located approximately 1.25 miles southwest of the Approved Project, which is in the Airport Influence Area(AIA) established by the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan(ONT ALUCP). Specifically, the Approved Project is within the Airspace Protection Zones.The proposed project implements the Approved Project and will not change the type or use or structures to be built at the project site. In accordance with PDF 7-1,the proposed project complies with the height restrictions outlined in Table 7.4, Development Standards, of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan. Specifically, no buildings will exceed the 60-foot height limit for the area south of 6a`Street. Further, construction activities,project structures, and operations will adhere to applicable requirements outlined in the ONT ALUCP as presented in RR 7-4:Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77, Subpart C, and applicable obstruction clearance standards published by the FAA; avigation easement; and real estate transaction disclosure. Compliance with applicable ONT ALUCP requirements will ensure that potential safety hazards related to airport operations are less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. E5--6Pg90 Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter-mile of an existing or proposed school? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI, which includes the project site, is not within 1/4-mile of a school.There have been no changes to the location of the proposed project or schools in the area.No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, ;Mold it create a signnijicant hazard to the public or the environment? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI,which includes the project site, is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The project site is also not a current list of hazardous materials sites.No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in it safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, there are no private air strips in the vicinity of PAI,which includes the project site. There have been no changes to the location of the proposed project or private•airstrips in the area.No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. Would the project impair implementation of orphysically interfere with an adopted-emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, the Approved Project does not include any uses that would impede or interfere with implementation of the City's Emergency Operations Plan,and would not exacerbate existing hazards conditions addressed in the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.The proposed project implements the Approved Project and does not involve a change in the type or location of uses in PAT,or a change in access and planned roadways. Therefore, consistent with the Approved Project, the proposed project will not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. Would tyre project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildlannd fires, including where wildlannds are adjacent to urbanized,areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlanids? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific PIan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI, which includes the project site,is not in an area subject to wildland fires. There have been no changes to the location of the proposed project or identification of high fire hazard areas in the vicinity of the project site.No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. 12 E5-6Pg9l 8.0 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Threshold 8.I JVorrld the project violate atry wetter grtality standards or•►vaste discharge requirements? Threshold 8.2 f3'ould the project otherwise substantially degr•aele water grealit�� The physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within the impact area addressed in the Final FIR for the Approved Project and the receiving water bodies will be the same. Additionally,there are no proposed changes to the type of land uses to be developed at the project site. The type of constriction activities and equipment for the proposed project will also be the same as analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Therefore, the types of pollutants that will be generated by the proposed project during construction and operation will be the same as the Approved Project. The proposed project incorporates RR 8-1,which addresses compliance with the NPDFS General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction Activity(Construction General Permit) and implementation of a storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP)during construction. Further, as with the Approved Project, the proposed project will comply with the Clean Water Act(CWA) and all applicable City, County, and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) regulations and water quality standards including compliance with applicable NPDES and municipal separate storin sewer (MS4)permit requirements. Notably, a Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) has been prepared for the proposed project(per RR 8-2), which is consistent with the Master Plan of Stonn Water Quality prepared for the Approved Project.Additionally,operation of proposed uses will be conducted in accordance with Chapter 19.20 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which is the City's Storm Water and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (per RR 8-3). Storm water runoff and nuisance flows form the project site will be intercepted by area drains and catch basins. Before water leaves the project site, a diversion manhole will intercept the low flow ninoff and route it into a pre- treatment clarifier, which will remove debris, trash, oils and pollutants from the runoff before routing clean water into an adjacent retention pipe. As the retention pipe fills, adjacent injection wells will infiltrate the runoff into the soils below. Compliance with RR 8-1 through RR 8-3 and implementation of the project-specific WQMP will prevent violations of water quality standards and the degradation of storm water quality. Water quality impacts will be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final ETR.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 8.3 Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite? Threshold 8.4 Would tine project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount ofsurface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding onsite or offsite? The proposed project implements the Approved Project, and the physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within the impact area addressed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project.There are no proposed changes to the type of land uses to be developed at the project site(residential),the pattern of development relative to pervious and impervious areas, and the proposed storm drain system. Therefore, the estimated increase in the amount and rate of runoff that will be generated by the proposed project during operation will be similar to the Approved Project,and the required storm drain facilities will be the same. As anticipated with the Approved Project, storm water from the project site will connect to the 13 E5-6Pg92 storm drain line in The Resort Parkway,which will flow in a southerly direction toward the 4th Street storm drain in the City of Ontario,consistent with the pre-development drainage patterns. As identified in the Final EIR, PAI, including the project site, is in the defined hydrologic conditions of concern (HCOC)-exempt area on the County's on-line Stormwater Facility Mapping Tool. Therefore, additional detention (reduction) in peak runoff from the storm water event is not required. This is because runoff from the site enters the Guasti-Cucamonga Regional Park and Turner Basins.Titus,increases in runoff from development with implementation of the proposed project will not lead to HCOCs. Changes in drainage patterns at the project site will be consistent with that evaluated for the Approved Project in the Final EIR and will not lead to erosion, siltation, or flooding at downstream facilities. Impacts will be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for-the Approved Project. Threshold 8.5 Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storfn►vater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of pollutant runoff? ThresholdS.6 bf"oultl the project require or result iti the coftstrttction of new storfrt water drainage facilities or exlfansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? As identified above, there are no proposed changes to the type of land uses to be developed at the project site or the pattern of development.Therefore, the estimated increase in the amount and rate of runoff that will be generated by the proposed project during operation will be similar to the Approved Project, and the required stone drain facilities will be the same, Storun water runoff from the Approved Project, including the project site,will increase flows in downstream lines, but will not exceed the capacities of the 4th Street Stone Drain. Storm water pollutants and storm water runoff quantities will be reduced by on-site best management practices (BMPs) as identified in the project-specific WQMP required by RR 8- 2. Consistent with Final EIR conclusions for the Approved Project, no expansion of existing off-site stonn drain facilities is needed for the proposed project. Additionally,the physical impacts associated with installation of onsite storm drain facilities will be the same as evaluated for the Approved Project in the Final EIR. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. K'ould the project substantially deplete grorffrdwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level(e.g., the production rate ofpre-existing frearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI is not within a groundwater recharge area and the Approved Project would not deplete groundwater supplies.The physical impact area for the proposed project is entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved Project evaluated in the Final EIR, and the proposed project implements the Approved Project. Therefore, the proposed project will not interfere with groundwater recharge or deplete groundwater supplies.No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. 14 E5--5Pg93 Would the project place housing within a 100 year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Bornidar3,or Flood I nsurance Rate Map or outer flood hazard delineation►crap? Would the project place within a 100 year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Would the project expose people or structures to a significant rush of loss, in fury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of Nie failure of a levee or dans? Would the project result in inundation by seiche, tsunan , or urudfloiv? i As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI,which includes the project site, is (1)not within a flood hazard area, (2) not within a dam inundation area, and(3)not subject to inundation from a seiche, tsunami, or mudflow.No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. 9.0 LAND USE AND PLANNING Threshold 9.1 Would the proposed project conflict with airy rnpplicable land use pltnhn,policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project(including, but not limited to, the generalplan,specific plait, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adoptedfor the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? With approval of the Empire Lakes/IASP Sub-Area Specific Plan Amendment and associated General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment, the City of Rancho Cucamonga established new land use regulations and development standards for development within PAT of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, including the project site. The Final EIR concluded that these land use changes would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. As further discussed in the Project Description of this document, the proposed project, which involves the construction and operation of 296 residential units and associated open space and recreation uses, implements the Approved Project(with up to 3,450 units), and complies with applicable development standards and other requirements outlined in the Empire Lake Specific Plan.As with the Approved Project, the proposed project will not conflict with any applicable local or regional land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Would the project physically divide an established conunrtrtity? The Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR concluded that implementation of the Approved Project in PAI, which is surrounding by existing development,would not divide an established community. The proposed project is located entirely within PAI, implements the Approved Project, and will not divide an established community.No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. Would the project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or►natural community conservation plait? As previously discussed in the Biological Resources section of this document, PAI,which includes the project site, is not within an HCP or NCCP.No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. 15 E5-6Pg94 10.0 NOISE Threshold 10..1 Would the project result in it substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ill the project vicinity alcove levels existing without the project? The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in less than significant increases in long- term ambient noise levels from project-generated traffic to off-site sensitive receptors,and at residences adjacent to the project site from noise generated on-site by traffic on project site roads.Additionally,the Final EIR concluded that potential noise impacts to on-site and off-site residential uses from operation of proposed uses in PAI would be less than significant with adherence to the noise standards outlined in the City's Development Code and the California Building Standards Code. With respect to traffic-generated noise, as discussed in the Traffic Analysis included in Attachment B, it is estimated that the trip generation for the proposed project will be consistent with and possibly less than that assumed in the.Final EIR for the Approved Project(for Placctypes S-21 and S-22). Therefore, the proposed project will not increase traffic-related noise levelsalong roadways internal and external to PAI beyond that anticipated in the Final EIR as a result of implementation of the Approved Project. Long-term noise levels from project-generated traffic to off-site sensitive receptors, and at residences adjacent to the project site from noise generated on-site by traffic on project site roads will be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. Existing sensitive receptors closest to the project site are the adjacent residential uses to the east. Additionally, the project site is adjacent to the planned recreation center adjacent to and northwest of the project site, and planned residential uses to the south within PAI.The existing and planned residential uses were identified in the Final EIR and there are no new sensitive receptors in proximity to the project site.The proposed uses, operations, and activities associated with the proposed residential development will be consistent with that anticipated in the Final EIR. Noise-generating operations/activities will comply with noise standards established in the City's Development Code (refer to RR 10-3) and impacts will be less than significant, consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 10.2 Would the project expose persons to orgeneration of excessive groundbovte vibration orgroundbornne noise levels? The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would result in potentially significant construction vibration annoyance impacts to residents of adjacent buildings (from heavy equipment operation close to buildings), but this impact is reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of MM 10-1. The Final EIR also concluded there would be a less than significant impact for structural vibration impacts. The project site, which is entirely within PAI, is adjacent to existing residential buildings to the east. Mass grading activities,which the Final EIR concluded would result in potentially significant construction vibration annoyance impacts to residents of adjacent buildings (from heavy equipment operation close to buildings),have been completed pursuant to previously issued permits.No heavy grading equipment will be used adjacent to existing residents for the remaining construction activities associated with the proposed project. Therefore,no significant vibration annoyance or structural vibration impacts will occur with construction of the proposed residential uses and associated open space amenities. The Final EIR concluded that long-term vibration impacts to residences within 200 feet of the railroad tracks north of the project site would be potentially significant but this impact is reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of MM 10-2,which requires a vibration analysis prior to the 16 E5-6Pg95 approval of building permits. The project site is south of 6'h Street and not within 200 feet of the railroad tracks; therefore, there will be no impacts to proposed residential uses from operations along the railroad. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 10.3 Would the project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing Wthout the project? The Final EIR concluded that constriction of the Approved Project would result in temporary potentially significant construction noise impacts from site preparation, demolition,grading, concrete and asphalt crushing, green waste mulching, and similar construction activities. As previously identified, the project is adjacent to existing residential uses to the east. Consistent with the conclusions of the Final EIR, even with adherence to RR 10-1 (construction day and hourly restrictions outlined the City's Development Code), and implementation of MM 10-3 (installation of a temporary noise barrier between the project site and adjacent residences) and 10-5 (construction noise mitigation plan), these sensitive receptors may be exposed to temporary or periodic increases in noise during construction that exceed 65 dBA(A-weighted decibel scale), resulting in a potentially significant and unavoidable impact. However, the construction activities associated with the proposed project, including the type of equipment being operated on a daily basis, will not exceed the construction assumptions that were the basis for the analysis in the Final ETR. Further, mass grading activities for PAI south of 6`u' Street,which involve the use of the largest equipment and generate higher noise levels than other construction activities, have been completed. MM 10-3, which requires installation of temporary noise barrier between the construction areas and existing residences within 500-feet,was completed as part of the mass grading activities and the barrier will remain in place during construction of the proposed project. Similarly,the construction-related noise mitigation plan developed for the mass grading activities, as required by MM 10-4, will also be applied to construction activities for the proposed project. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 10.4 Would the project expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? The Final EIR concluded that potential impacts related to operational noise that exceeds the General Plan noise and land use compatibility levels would be reduced to less than significant levels. Notably, it was concluded that future noise levels along 6th Street could exceed the established noise standards for interior habitable rooms of residential uses (45 dBA or less, as required by the California Building Code) and exterior noise standards identified in the City's General Plan(Conditionally Acceptable 70 dBA CNEL noise compatibility limit). Therefore,the impact to residential uses along 6th Street was detennined to be significant prior to mitigation. MM 10-7 requires the preparation of an acoustic study to demonstrate that with proposed architectural features residential habitable rooms facing 6`h Street have interior noise levels of 45 dBA or less, and to demonstrate that exterior noise levels do not exceed 70 dBA CNEL.The required acoustic study has been prepared for the proposed project and is provided in Attachment A to this document. The only exposed exterior areas for the proposed project are the balconies and patios for the residential units along 6'h Street. The acoustic study demonstrates that with the incorporation of windows and doors with a Sound Transmission Class (STC)rating of 26 for habitable rooms, and the installation of solid barriers 5 feet high at the porches and decks facing 6`h Street, the established interior and exterior noise standards will be met. 17 E5-6Pg96 The Final EIR concluded that construction noise from the Approved Project would potentially exceed the noise level limits established in the City's Development Code resulting in a potentially significant noise impact. With implementation of RRs and MMs, impacts from construction noise that exceed the City Development Code requirements would be reduced,but not to a less than significant level. This impact is significant and unavoidable for the Approved Project.As described in the Project Description, construction activities associated with the proposed project will be consistent with the constriction assumptions that were the basis for the analysis in the Final EIR. Further,mass grading activities for PAI south of 6`h Street, which involve the use of the largest equipment and generate higher noise levels than other construction activities,have been completed.MM 10-3 and MM 10-4 are being implemented for current mass grading operations and will remain in effect during remaining construction activities for the proposed project. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. For a project located within an airport land rise plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? For a project within the vicinity,of a private airstrip, would the project e_,pose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? The Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR identified that the 60 dB CNEL contour for the LA/Ontario International Airport does not lie within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the LA/Ontario International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ONT ALUCP) identifies that Rancho Cucamonga is not an affected jurisdiction for noise. Additionally,PAI is not within the vicinity of a private air strip. Consistent with the conclusion of the Initial Study, the proposed residential uses, which are within PAI, are not within the 60 dB CNEL contour for the LA/Ontario International Airport, and will not be exposed to excessive noise levels from airport operations.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. 11.0 POPULATION AND HOUSING Threshold 11.1 Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly(for evanrple, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly(for example, through the extension of roads or other infrastrrrcture)? The proposed project involves the development of 296 residential units within PAI; no non-residential uses are proposed. To date,no other residentials units have been developed in PAI. Based on the population generation factor used in the Final EIR(3.04 residents per dwelling unit), the proposed project will generate approximately 900 new residents in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,compared to up to 10,488 new residents assumed in the Final EIR. The proposed project is consistent with the Approved Project, and will not generate new population beyond that anticipated in the Final EIR. It should also be noted that SCAG's latest growth forecasts as presented in the SCAG 2016-2040 RTP/SCS, adopted after certification of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR, include the growth that will occur from implementation of the Approved Project, including the proposed project.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. 18 E5--6Pg97 Would the project displace substantial numbers of e-isting housing, necessitating the construction of replacement!ionising elsewhere? Would the project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsefvhere? As identified in the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, PAI was previously developed with the Empire Lakes Golf Course and the Approved Project would not displace housing or people. The project site has been mass graded and there is no existing development. The proposed project involves the development of residential units and will not displace housing or people. No new impacts will result with implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. 12.0 PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION Thresholds 12.1 through 12.4 Would the proposed project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated fvith the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant envirornuental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for: • Fire Protection? e Police Protection? • Schools? • Libraries? The proposed project implements the Approved Project,and involves the development of 296 residential units within PAI; no non-residential uses are proposed.To date, no other residentials units have been developed in PAI.Therefore, the increased demand on public services (fire, police, libraries)from the proposed project and the potential increase in students will not exceed that assumed and evaluated in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. As with the Approved Project, the proposed project incorporates RR 12-1 (compliance with applicable codes, ordinances and standard conditions, including the current edition of the California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(RCFPD) Fire Protection Standards and Guidance Documents); RR 12-2(payment of applicable development impact fees to the City for public services); and,RR 12-4(payment of developer fees to the impacted school districts). Further, the proposed project incorporates Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED.) features (refer to PDF 12-1)and the City has purchased a site for a potential future fire station (refer to PDF 12-4). Potential impacts to public services will be less than significant, consistent with conclusions of the Final EIR.No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. 19 E5--6Pg98 Threshold 12.5 Would the proposed project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for nefv or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks? Threshold 12.6 Would the proposed project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility ivould occur or be accelerated? Threshold 12.7 lVould the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of rec!'e(ltrollal f(icllrtles which night have an adverse physical effect on the environment? The proposed project implements the Approved Project, and involves the development of 296 residential units within PAI; no non-residential uses are proposed. To date, no other residentials units have been developed in PAI. Therefore, the increased demand for parks from the proposed project will not exceed that assumed and evaluated in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. As with the Approved Project, the proposed project will require payment of the City's Community and Recreation Center impact Fee (RR 12-2), and dedication of land,payment of in-lieu fees, or a combination of both for the provision of neighborhood and community park or recreational purposes(RR 12-3). Compliance with requirements and the provision of park and recreational facilities throughout PAI, as identified in the Specific Plan, will ensure that impacts to parks will be less than significant, consistent with conclusions of the Final EIR. The proposed project does not involve the development of any of the identified REC (recreation areas) in the Specific Plan; however, a planned recreation area will be constructed adjacent to the proposed project before occupancy of the proposed residential units. The proposed project does include open space areas and amenities and the physical impacts associated with implementation of these facilities have been analyzed in the Final EIR and this document. No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. 13.0 TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC Threshold 13.1 Would the project conflict with any applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all erodes of transportation including mass transit and noir-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, hicliiding but not limited to intersections, streets, highways rind freeways,pedestrian: and bicycle paths, and mass transit? The Final EIR concluded that vehicle trips generated by operation of the Empires Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Project(Approved Project)would lead to study area intersections and freeway facilities operating at deficient level of service(LOS) (exceeding City of Rancho Cucamonga, City of Ontario, and/or Caltrans standards).Even with implementation of RR 13-2 and RR 13-3, and MM 13-1 through MM 13-4,impacts would remain significant due to the lack of feasible mitigation or because the project. Property Owner/Developer or the City of Rancho Cucamonga cannot guarantee the implementation of improvements in another jurisdiction. Significant and unavoidable impacts were identified at 1-10 and I- 15 mainline segments and ramps under the Existing Year(2014) and/or Completion Year(2024)Plus Project and Cumulative Year(2036)traffic analysis scenarios. The proposed project involves the development of 296 residential units in PAI of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan area.There are currently no residental units constructed in PAI,and no other residential units have been approved for development. Fehr& Peers conducted an analysis of the proposed project to detennine its consistency with the Approved Project as it relates to the traffic analysis assumptions that 20 ES-6Pg99 were the basis for the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)conducted for and presented in the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Final EIR. The Van Daele 296 TTNf 20147, Lot 4 Traffic Mento—Empire Lakes prepared by Felir& Peers (June 18, 2018) is provided in Attachment B of this document(Traffic Memo). As presented in the Traffic Memo, the proposed project is consistent with the Approved Project with respect to location(within the Specific Plan area), access (from The Resort Parkway only),size (296 apartment units compared to 1,154 apartment units assumed in the Specific Plan area south of 6`h Street), and access design (adheres to the Sepcific Plan guidelines and City standards). Although the proposed number of residential units is consistent with the Approved Project, the density assumptions are slightly different. Therefore, a review of trip generation from the proposed project was conducted.As described in the Traffic Memo, based on review of a similar development, it was determined that the proposed project is consistent with the assumptions in the TIA (or will generate less traffic than that assumed in the TIA). Therefore, the TIA accounted for the proposed project.There will not be an increase in trip generation with the proposed project compared to that assumed in the TIA and, with implementation of applicable PDFs,RRs and MMs,no new or substantially more severe traffic impacts at study intersections or freeway mainline segements will result. With respect to constriction-related traffic, as identified in the Project Description, there will be no heavy truck trips on the local roadways associated with finish grading activities. However, there will be heavy truck trips associated with other construction activities for the import of materials, concrete, etc. (estimated to be approximately 8-10 heavy trips per day). The number of heavy truck trips for the proposed project will be a relatively small portion of the estimated 50 heavy trucks on a daily basis. Construction activities and associated truck travel will be required to comply with applicable City requirements, including Chapter 10.56,Truck Routes and Restrictions, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code(refer to Regulatory Requirement [RR] 13-4). No new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 13.2 Would the project conflict ivith (tut applicable congestion management program, inchtding, but not limited to level ofservice standards and travel dentand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion? The Final EIR concluded that San Bernardino County Congestion Management Plan(CMP)-designated intersections and freeway facilities would operate at a deficient LOS with the Approved Project. Identified mitigation for certain intersections is not feasible and/or the Property Owner/Developer and the City of Rancho Cucamonga cannot guarantee implementation of mitigation in the City of Ontario or for Caltrans facilities. Impacts to CMP intersections were determined to be significant and unavoidable along with freeway mainline segments and ramps along I-10 and I-15. As described above for Threshold 13.1, there will not be an increase in trip generation with the proposed project compared to that assumed in the TIA and no new or substantially more severe traffic impacts at study intersections or freeway mainline segements will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. As identified in the Final EIR, there is no feasible mitigation for these impacts, and/or the Property Owner/Developer or the City of Rancho Cucamonga cannot guarantee the implementation of improvements in another jurisdiction.Therefore,significant and unavoidable impacts at CMP facilities identified in the Final EIR will occur with the proposed project. 21 1=5--6Pg100 i Threshold 13.3 Would the project substantially increase hazards mare to a design feature (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.1-,fin-11Z equiprrrent)? Threshold 13.4 Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would provide adequate project access and an internal circulation system (refer to Project Desgin Feature [PDF] 13-1),which would be in compliance with applicable requirements for emergency access (refer to RR 12-1). Notably, it was detennined that there would be: (1) sufficient internal accessibility throughout the site (Specific Plan area), (2) approporiate traffic-control devices, (3) adequate spacing between external access points, and(4) adequate emergency vehicle access. Impacts were determined to be less than significant and no additional mitigation was required. As demonstrated by a comparison of Figure 1, Internal Circulation Analyzed Intersections, and Figure 2, Conceptual Site Plan, of the Traffic Memo, the proposed project maintains the same internal and external circulation system and access points as the Approved Project. The proposed project will not change the types of uses proposed in Specific Plan Placetypes S-21 and S-22, and will not change the access requirements for these areas. Prior to occupany of the proposed units, required intersection improvements will be constricted by the Master Developer. Further, the proposed project will adhere to applicable codes, ordinances and standard conditions,including the current edition of the California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(RCFPD) Fire Protection Standards and Guidance Documents regarding access (as required by RR 12-1).Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Threshold 13.5 Would the project conflict with adopted policies,plans, or progrruns regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? The Final EIR concluded that the Approved Project would promote the use of alternative transportation systems (i.e., sidewalks, bikeways and bus service, transit).This would be accomplished by connecting pedestrians and bicyclists to locations on the.project site; to the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink Station adjacent to and northeast of the Specific Plan area;to nearby employment-generating and retail uses; and to bus facilities. Additionally, pedestrian connections would be provided to residential uses to the east to facilitate the access from these residents to on-site multi-modal facilities, including the Vine(now referred to as The Resort Parkway). The proposed project implements development allowed in the southeast portion of PAI, south of 6`h Street. As shown in the illustrative site plan included in the Project Description,consistent with Specific Plan requirements, the proposed project includes pedestrian pathways throughout the development area that will serve pedestrian and bicyclists,and will connect to The Resort Parkway and the existing community to the east.The Resort Parkway will provide bike lanes with bike-safety striping and sidewalks on both sides of the street.Therefore, connections to this roadway with the proposed will facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel throughout the development area and to external uses, including transit facilities. As with the Approved Project, the proposed project will not preclude pedestrians, bicyclists, or transit users from traveling along existing and planned non-vehicular facilities and will facilitate access to these alternative transportation facilities from on-site land uses. The proposed project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit,bicycle, or pedestrian facilities,nor will it otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Therefore, no new or substantially more severe impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. Would the project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or change in location that results in substantial safety risks? 22 E5-6Pg101 The Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR concluded that the anticipated increase in population and employment generated by the uses that would be allowed by the Approved Project would not be of a magnitude that would impact air traffic volumes. Further, the Approved Project would not include any uses that would change air traffic patterns. It was determined that no substantial safety risks would result from the Approved Project and no mitigation was required. Consistent with the conclusion of the Initial Study, the proposed residential uses, which are entirely within PAI of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan area and ate consistent with the amount and type of residential development anticipated by the Approved Project,will not impact air traffic volumes or change air traffic patterns. Therefore, there will no substantial safety risks from such changes.No new impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. 14.0 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Threshold 14.1 Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project f•om existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Threshold 14.2 Would the project require or result in the construction of 71e water or wastewater treatmeant facilities or expansion of existing-facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Threshold 14.3 Would the project result in a determination by the waste►vater treatmentprovider which serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve theproject's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitluents? Threshold 14.4 Would the project be served by a landfall with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal►reeds? Threshold 14.5 Would the project comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Threshold 14.6 Would the project require or result in the construction of new electric, natural gas or communication facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The proposed project implements the Approved Project, and involves the development of 296 residential units within PAI; no non-residential uses are proposed.To date, no other residentials units have been developed in PAI. Therefore, the proposed project would not exceed the amount of projected demand for water or dry utilities or increase the amount of wastewater or solid waste generation anticipate for the Approved Project. Because the amount and types of uses proposed would be consistent with the Approved Project,the utility infrastructure (on site and off site)needed to serve the proposed development would be the same as with the Approved Project(e.g., water, sewer, electric,natural gas, and telecommunications). As with the Approved Project,utility infrastructure would be installed on site to serve the proposed uses and would connect to existing and planned utility infrastructure adjacent to the project site.The physical impact area for the utility infrastructure for the proposed project is entirely within the physical impact area for the Approved Project and evaluated in the Final EIR. Consistent with conclusion of the Final EIR, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact related to utilities and service systems. No new impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Final EIR for the Approved Project. 23 1.5-6Pg l 02 Mould the project exceed wasteivater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Ouatio, Control Board? Consistent with the conclusions of the Initial Study prepared for the Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment Draft EIR, development within the City, including the Approved Project and the proposed project, is required to comply with all applicable wastewater discharge requirements of the NPDES program, as enforced by the Santa Ana RWQCB. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in an exceedance of wastewater treatment requirements and would be less than significant.No new impacts will result from implementation of the proposed project compared to what was analyzed in the Initial Study. 24 E5-6Pg103 ATTACHMENT A ACOUSTIC STUDY E5-5Pgl04 Fa;l'miwaiy 22 2018 Mr, Josh G aaas ,, Sa°aa�uwaa. Mocci M aaag7ur VIA ENIAM awaaaru 1)'wle ficaaaa:a"" vaaraalaaaYMz ewn 2900 Adams `strii o, Stubs (' 25 R.h J a nidc (°aulMmin 92,50.4 "laal,Ucu.l: (,a1a /a;aarasnc Study kv I he lea"wort I a'9ati:aRiw a^Tran MY 20 W7 Dom ,` r� O au s:a': Pc°a w wrtlt' rcwquu Yt, 1"~~w,aal;as has cuamlals:wd Mis Barn ushcaal .sl uwly Wr TO Hama I crmaalk e lha a W 2M 47 to c&reiVly widi Nispigalkm Wasu re KIM) 10.7 of Wo Erlyo 'Jr:'jt ^/ra Phm (1-l."I') ,"('ta7a-r9u c ar 7N.aa7aayr/au F'7r:rra.-11rwu"lrnnu 7haact q 7, muu7 a""a•aNa v on E1auMrarrroMal I/aqn w°g Ror),nn {1 ianp im 1,saW 1 &M 1',lR or I'araaai 1110) ccitilu d by Ow Cly c,f"la",ancluw, ULILaraaaaaaaggaa hi May 2010 (Suite (.°1e;;6mu las use [fi(°1f l No,. 2015041083): - MM 104 11 Ar t„ usnuatwe of lalaiWagw, 1"awwru AN Rn Mlcliuys adjamm to 60 Surat- ¢lure 1"gay uy ( tw1M- M,)uavch)j1Or Shall saa1wuualt an aon aastucM ataMuBy to dw (`i'ty of Rmicho td°aaauuuuuwngaa i:ga.uilaluaaa, (;)8"9ic°iaul that denionstraata s that the p rualwr,sa°u1 Bao lMit rua°frog°Bal d siun would provideall iwu ei uuar ouuaM,a° lkj,,-caa1' .y A wwiupllp d wl"M (.'wwmMautruaity NOse Eq uiv aka'ud I eM (MA f." F ) aaa less AM QA a:ata laarilalwaaut tmfnc° noise a.~ooualit'ia iw) 0 Ball h alAtaroNc n;aa"s or We praala,a:,cwal buddkgs dJau`Aa.un, 60 S wa L 7-l'Me 1°"jars tlM raw/1)avWaaqaa,°t M ako Wmit Qn,s and .,pw°c'clua rations Showing tlaawl'; All ac°>"iwientiaal uan0s shall lac quaow°iaied w utlu a:a aaaw°a;N of auaa,•cha,uaind va.°aluktlauaa. as acqu.uir if by di (-ahlfwania 1(uuilalin g ('ode tawr marc ufaaaru o "At ra auaa{u w ry Wed AH a raMeriaau use areas sl°oall be Memed Maiuucl the bt.ailclaiugs or shelded by a sound Wl or u:rtluwau harrier to laraaw icle cx1crior noise levels nor exceeding 70 ulBA IW1a,M... M'RO.11"X''T 1a(Wd"k FJON AND 111:S(.1 11'T1(1N Vaasa D7 wlu is lwlauaaaaung this;ecauast.M aaction and wTa°r2utua n aai`2"M6 RPM uedderat'io�l1 units iva Ow I:saaia'le l_aakes Specific Pkrn orc°aa The prcMlec° sutceracaam p a"a°s :ugapv:"«;.arastiaw ly, 17 1. wac re,,s arici is, x aaraa rarlly iaru aatccl a;aau.rtta Bal"Cala Street .:and cam lal'The i(a°out Parkway(laaaaw erly a-eiWNi to as The 'Vine) (Mr twa Exhibit 1 f. The Re,'oi1 P'ark"ww°May is tlae hafauuauaed laraalc°a e atry, ua maaartiM-,°t„tatla stavca that x0l iaaflu.raaW with tale Meet. As "11uwrwn on thw eleaataatiw,re'l'raac,t Map (`C1 NI) fuss+wided in f~,xlaulait 1, daces' are ec°sicic°autuaal units planned aulwaauag 0 trr.-v n wlaia,ls rriggoN Ow Jac^ed to w.°eanWits e Us auu°laaLas icaal shru1y'. '11v two kiilu.q fli'S adjacent to fith Sheet will be three-story stacked Elaais OvIuc"wi to is (lie 'B uilding A" cicsirin). ENI ibits '�xaa and 2b shuww° We lauuu8ul ny clewntions and Ie,xlali s I M and 5 show the fnr(at, second, and Tird floor plans. Chi thae first(ground) 1l�ook 4mc u.unk in NO latuMla.l&g warill h%e. twwo laeclrawuwutsru and an c xlerua r porch I aaaiuuag 60 Suaatw, w 6h tine (Ent Raa mn .",c;laaum Wd Qw n flag, rwrcw h by ww°ivaw)wawws r-r Jh/r D//�/�/i/./ �/// ✓/./ o ,//,/7//i c!// //' �/ r i , ;////l�,/!,/ a /,, �j/ i, /, // � ,/ r,/ % 1. / /l!I !/!" r / � t o r / i J/s // 7/.. NU Jaw elr Ga use l'r.lwraumy 12015 I��rarXe ' .. Ornd ar almm Ile Iruwch will have an aplaru wrrnatch 4431 hQh W wvilh ar gm, (A the scc°orrcl and thurc] floors, two ranits in w'ach hrnrlclirrr.w ww r11 have Q lrechrorwas and an crxtcerior deck tsrdraat froth `^'ktrw:a wwith We (:ar nt W)m eseparaate(i from the deck by ar d'uc:ing dowor The e.iu.cks will h<rvc 47"rnc:h high ]rwurrie" Balcoona wwhoelowa s and the clooN separating the ]rune:°h arra.& clou"I'o`n Krona the (]rad Roo ns wvulR have au Soimd "Iransnaissicrra (lass (STV) rating oI'26. Rc'siderHid unds wwill be provralcd with ar memrs of me°dtanical V(alkkniora ]or ocCUjc );ancy "Th windows c'luasaL as reu:Irrurcwd by tlue QhK aWt h.aaihlinlw (°ocluw. NOISE CALCAJLATION �NTF 11101) Ile rrurrse Inds rriitmW to ms:ualtiom ys in thti. 1rrojec;t trrui"ic ,mauly rwea were esfi luted rgw,�irnl��, thy: hedelwzl hlighway ,fie rdnistrrrtion's (hhl "k,$) Iligll%vay Traffic Nojsc Pi%:uuaiction Muwdc] (RD 77 10x1 1`hc 1'hWmodel cle,Ga°rrarirws a Iwr'c° hu'nu.1 noise level tlumugh a scuries rw1"rrullunrRtrwems to a relivaruuT sound qew d 'These taul,pr.astrwrems accMus iuwr-trurMw flown spc'ecl, nock mix. v;aryunls rloslymc,°s Irony rluc' roarulww,ry. Ic,ngih of exposcrr,1 ruKnlwzrw, aml rurarse w,luisrla10g, The calculations do not We inw rra+:arowrr=t the ed'foo Q' any eurwrsc b anias or UTngmphry Ilml nmy affect mtutaknl nNse lc°vek, lwOMSEf pv 1 RC It al I'1"w h,,dOwwirrtr traffic a1, a wwvre used to calcralautw° tr.rhHc rraarw lc,^wtiA rat Te pBa nned rcsrafarww"°ties: 0 ':Ile average daHy W'iow tolnnwe (r'w1YT) urtu 61h Suvet is prw,r"1eeted to he :4088 velikles in 7036, as startc:°d in ` QCtion "l.lo of the t:nlpirc: I"Ikc,s Specific" Plan FIR. 0 The westul M wccIrraiNon dStrcet is t nrlc� �.r hour ar 0 ,The future tr dame nix is em Well at 96 pace°rat arzttornoha0, 1 per mt tne;chmn trued s, and 3 percent heavy trucks It is noted that these clarttr arae consc'rva6ve he~(:auwe; 3 percent hcaavy Wucks would he a cfayt�imu vaalnrtac: of approxaztaaatcly 42 nisch passes per hour('apl:wtowira.aate°ly oncr heavy trawk evoy 96 seconcky ancly with Be irrc"rear,sing myna or"o elc°oItIc vehiti.ks in Cw"r.rlitornK the aw cra,ge wcrhic'le noise in 036 ww°iH be Inas ilaaan the noisc atatta in the n-,af i.e noise ca,a lcurlaution model. Ile lase. es of We pl,r ned residendal 1.anildhigs would E°wc° approximately 7-5 Sac°t Irony the c~c:r iet-litre ()I, 6th %rec't at the closwrwat poily ('rclar to E",vhitrit 6). Using to "We e c ata Wcr bed above, the traffic noiso rnowlt;I results in a nu"oisc 'level of?] c113 ("NI'l . ]:Ile rw'irrdokvs and doors in be haWnble r"crurms l''lrchag,t'ithr Tru.°a°t would have a `I"d" mating o1" 6, irnlalyirw(t /a 76 dBA novae rew&wtion caap°rtwuh, l hers, the grulest irwt Hor nuke levels aury c°aIc°nlatueul W he els dHA fWI'1I.,, wwhich c'onyhes "it We;raprtircrum ordie h iforue Lakc:s Specific Plan [~",'IR ly'lM 10-7 and I`utic 24 of the CerC6forwcra ("de rof.&grclwctru.wru, artsu:r Iwrrowm as the. (AlU wrra'ia 13WIding Strmd anis Uode As stated above, the carlc.u.rlautcef noise levels at the hnilchnla tac.�KCCS„ wwIhrwwh is 011so the AW o1 the lwaarc'he,s and doe ,ks, is 71 LIRA t"` EL. The porches and clee& ww'ill have solid mmlls on the sides Wait extend to thew, @iu W of Me]myelic,, and cic;ek,s. Thewse side walls will block ,'mise traflie noise to awns of the cloak hack from Ow f"rrarat. 1-ow evvr", the ITont tne;aas of the lwuarc:hes rind decks would hta'ke 110kt: 1eVels CXCecaling 70 clBA t°NE . "I'Ire.retbre, noise auenn,rt.hm in he Hal of"solid barriers 5 feel high, at thew porches and a.leck.s t'uc;irig6" Stren; iia reu.lrrirccl '1"he.se uruwlic'11'urrra"ieas vvHl reduce trtuf`tic r wise by ,,a least 5 alBA: the extler"iso i noose Icwvel will T°e less tlwn 70 03A t.;Nl?1_. and ww'ill cwomay "id"he rc'elnimaarcwntol`tlrcw Enuirire Iaake,.,� Specific Plama FAR NIN1 10-7. Following is ra cicsc;rilation of the specifimahns for the hawtriers: Ca— P10 1,btaI,aOry21 2ItI8 Page a Vfirst Floor, Porches. Fhe a,"al s will he 5 fur figh, madu off`sadid inatedal and Mod ter munanAze the r.opaiirr,. s (gaps) larauncen the parte; and the atQuoro "As and betw✓a,e;nt the maws and t'lw Waacarnd aarinc°rt the ganWs are Wed.ped. 'I he caraa:lls"V be nve Wet lays h, The wa:runal drscra.l f°r;rrAhe garter and waaH aerull have e,as tralrnsna"ni`n.kin loss caf`aat W a'ct 15 MA. f.xam les of nnrarfcarids and tnaan ruks,raann loss include °W-kwh 1'srAS dFaA„ WArwh fIync°a,«cl20 r11t:A; Mra�ac^lr .aaKy Waa" ?2 alla'a:Q ntrrc6Winch lalananlalaas 22 elBA 6 ;"~,ice+aaarl ,and °Maar lahwrr Mck, '1"'lae baaorner.r:n "Ill lay % f"eet high am! nru.;aale 1ol-':nc1Hd rr"r icria:rl. The rrudchaal"n usc,l A Ow I'+<ar`r•ias Oily I= as tn,ann:xnnnaa,.,ra.nrn as o a'at lr.°aart 15 c IAI Yxiurrillk,a, c1f.. eaaadd<.ri al:an and traanrSMrclarra loss irMcl rde o:r"i:aS fir-1,8 all"M, ffly/aaraaod-20af[M/ l/ -mica sally ytla.naY22 care, and LOW Irlc°viy)IaaY.~a 2 a MA. Uthe upper laanAN cnf'la; hua:n°dem ;aa"a,, rrranrlc aa:Ah awlncrraalde 11€aorawls, they aa'i1:1 be a.Ec°.ntra ed to rrruatlMre Rafts he.tlwaion mowns sa:cnrmb Mai in the ckmed pos itianrn, In sarraannnaar , tlncn laltraraa ra.l na-rawlti-'f°:wrildl / re°Siderva"ttndl rraait: aagmrop, tau` Stra,,et avidl b, in aan:aarnfrhi mce evilh the c"'t:nrlalinl"iod irnia,,riorarn d exn knioi nca ise standal(k as ic6enfificd rnn /IN/( ltd 7 from tlaaa^ }:anala rc 1 aal aar., `pecilic Han ff'unaaal F I R" Inarnrl+l you I= any cicrestio n;n aalaaauat thk My, o1n nad ;aalcfitraan a ianOrrar�firant, lalc.me^ c"mrtnt me Lit '7Vml),Ptl-S028. i nc e,r a.'I,a, PSOMAS / F t: Inn"is6nl a l "Andersen Saar es 11 Kurtz Vcc' Prn:sidc nt, f=`,rnvirc,arnrr enlaal l'laanrrnnrr N'd se ( arrnsarltmn AU;l aclrrne nls� ["Xililaits 1 0 Ir iF°rpp; "IVWV;10 1!)DIQ1Mf Yr,irn- i6. h r1,,A:, r,t "b1,0,, 22210oo, lv5__6PglO IWATIVE MAC 7 MAP TEN TAT iwVSTRACpT--NpO6F320 147 EXHIBIT 1 ill 'Z zz Mm.oi E5-6PglO8 FXNtlI�iIU :?ar R 41, Will gg �✓� ��J;F „��,r,,,, ,,, :,,��.. �.,,,,�.u,,,,�, �,r, i,r,-r%��.,/.�.. i i� ;. �1 C��d^"�fu„/,,,w��.�o,� �"t,:'."I d�ro „urxn ,h�i, hnL.!0Uu UNC; `A' 9 PItFX P I I�E F 1l V ”0R" +T'A�.I^ k.Y3 F 1r",1 Y;, mne r°inM kf —6 a V9 I f fiLa, r r r Pay no.�uisi.0 f rRA�.rr B 2t qL f)d Pxk C> r 9. P L E X A 3. u 14f Pi l'beCKP I:'r FLAY » e E5-6Pg 110 EXHIBIT 3 - -- ------ - ---- - ------ - - ----- - ----------- -------------- 1 I SAll Elr FT llTf'p, r` Y r----------- o. Pea+µ ❑ ❑ I ,•.are�twa my enre r 3NfFT rNO.p 6nssonian ILa oni BUILDING 'A' 9-P L E X A3.3 Flrrl Ploor-Cent•m po rurr•-Sl rl+'A'El e•atl on ' *��• • THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS oe.o+.n Cvcnmonja,CA S]t I 7108 VAN DAME E5-6Pglll i EXHIBIT4 M. o�.v.p nsr x— r 't P. .r -I_.y.� r I,wx•. Isco � �n �ao.',x ram I .�1. ,.-L .u•. it _y,�,.° Em.ro. I i- i i {^u I{n - .. rr rig +ninon.o.0 Ip S. ��rt o.n n-v �a✓ rrr.wo r BUILDING 'A' 9-PLEX �X 3.. 6assenian�Lagoni 5...IdPl— oetem P A34 -e ..,e�14•v.s.•sn:nls Per.rr 81 I.'A'Eleratlon THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS R,nn,,...... rl.-0E II —� �.�511 Ix10r I•'v:� vAEiE)AELE E5-5Pg112 EXHIBITS {\ "Y`i{ s. PM. x I IE 1 1 ` r.. TV, A i SSI 2�5�I1�. tEnnGWnl � 'y 9.rW I � PUT ��1 laeo.aoi t :.1_I'.1�71 M�' y F--- *M•'—"'—[—"�—. �;G� � 1�•I __�. � nr.,, y�: . �crci T.00•Tt �tuarr.rai•r iWiFl NO. BUILDING 'A' 9-PLEX A3.5 �a SSGglBnlLigON mire lion,-C--perery..Sry1.'.'5-- THE i. —.THE RESORT - STACKED FLATS n1.ot,n - veH OA£LE E5-6Pg113 CONCEPtVALGRADIMG PLAN miccM44'IRFIWCS �n EXHIBIT6 TENTATIVE TRACT N0.20147 le�j 31, W � ~—�_�_--.—.-�—_ nuc xE50arP.SWc.SA _L]...0-R}-�--"--" -�--• 8 J ��z ` j 9j ir•� r� I, -- ..�5- 9 `- •� - ' - x = _ _.t..•l_ �• til • I II 41 r Ilmo- •+ `r �' � J � 9 11I 7 } L Q 1 `— I I In Is Maoskiersuer.Y� CG-03 65-6Pgll4 ATTACHMENT B TRAFFIC STUDY AND PARKING ANALYSIS E5-6Pg115 F E H R P E E R S MEMORANDUM D,ts t o: Uf'.)(t,,ited Ju.lne 18, 2018 Tc.): lcdi Gause, Van Daele Homes Ft am! lason D, flad;,, RE. Stibject: Van Doete 296 Ofit TTM 2014!7, Lot 4 Traffic Memo Empire Lakes Fehil & Pe&s cc:mlpleted the rinr;d nonspoacvirm bnpadAnal'ysis fot rnpj;,Ea L(rk(rs iir C)r:tr.)Ijer of 2015 (hanker) refeir'ed to as the 'HA) Ihe TIA pi"ovided tl-w fuH trainspottation irnpact assessnwrit of Hie proJect as, as whole and udenjhed inr--asures nc,a(,(Jed i10 ndtrgal:o pujiect irnpacts (unclucfing tirling of the i'nlbqatior) r),)easures. rhe TpA reaps esented the technicai basis for 01:e traffic: ii'npact sectiori of thcr EIR pireparcmJ for the f.)rcject. Cwiven0y, Van Dade Hoines ds woi'khig on ccjmpYehng subrnittas U.') the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the proposed 296 unit project (ITM 20147, Lot 4) generaHy located on the southe�,'ist quadrant of Fhe Resort Pairkway (foirrierly refened to as 'The Vine) ainci (5"' Stieel,, 'rhe purpose of tHs tnen'mranclurn IIs to doci-mient the aSSLm'q')bons' from the TIA associated vviih the pi'oject and note the Cl.PlEmt proposed project's consistency vviLh diose TIA assurylpteons, Tatlhe I cornpas(,as key a(thbutes asscidated with the pr(.',jf,)o5ed devell0prnent pro,ject antl the TIA assuniptions that couid potentiaHy affect tramportation, The Sp)ecific Plan land use ass u n iptkms are presented on Figure 1. The detaded site plan is presented on Figure 2. As sh(�mn iri Tabie, 1, the prq.)osed proJect attributes rare gencrafly cori�sislent with that` assun-iptions containect hn 11-ue TiA and EIR, In fact, the orfly difference between tile, current Van Da(,,Ie proposal and the ass urriptl(,)ais frorn the TIA is the slight density changes noted in the table. Y --6Pg 116 Mr,Josh Gause June 18, 2018 Page 2 of 7 Table 1: Van Daele Project Attributes Attribute TIA Assumption Current Proposal Consistency Location Southeast Corner of 6th Street and Consistent The Resort Parkway(The Vine) Access From The Resort Parkway Only Consistent—The TIA assumed access via access to two intersections (noted as intersections 203 and 202 in the site access assessment). Size 1,450 Apartments on the South Site Consistent -Van Daele proposes 296 (e.g. between 411 Street and 6th units, leaving 1,154 units left to be Street) developed on the South Site of Empire Lakes Density TIA assumed 4.55 acres at 18-35 Consistent—5 acres at 23 units per acre units per acre for the northernmost for the northernmost section,4.4 acres at section and 12.3 acres at 16-28 17.8 units per acre for the western section, units per acre. and 7.2 acres at 13.8 units per acre for the eastern section. The higher density section is slightly larger than that assumed in the traffic study, but the eastern section has slightly less density than that assumed in the traffic study. E5--6Pg117 Mr.Josh Gause June 18, 2018 Page 3 of 7 Access Assumed to be consistent with the Consistent Design Specific Plan guidelines and City Standards Given that the density assumptions are different than those contained in the TIA, it is prudent to discuss potential changes in trip generation associated with modifications in density below. Trip Generation Comparison The TIA utilized trip generation assuming an apartment land use category, corresponding to an average trip generation rate of 0.51 trips per unit during the AM peak hour and 0.62 trips per unit during the PM peak hour as shown in Table 3-7 of the TIA. Fehr& Peers collected traffic counts on February 15, 2018 at the Van Daele development in Brea, California, which has a similar product mix to what is proposed at Empire Lakes (the Brea development consists of 30 bungalow product units and 63 flat product units). Our traffic counts observed traffic into and out of theproject site as well as observations of near-by on-street parking that could be generating trips to/from the development. Our observations indicated that the Brea location generated 44 AM peak hour trips(6 inbound and 38 outbound) and 37 PM peak hour trips (26 inbound and 11 outbound), resulting in an average trip generation rate of 0,47 trips per unit during the AM peak hour and 0.40 trips per unit during the PM peak hour. The measured Brea rates resulted in 7% lower AM peak hour trip generation and 36% lower PM peak hour trip generation when compared to the rates used in the TIA. Based on this local empirical data, the results indicate that this similar product mix generates reduced trip generation relative to the TIA trip rates. As such, we anticipate the trip generation of the Van Daele project to be less than that assumed in the TIA. E5-6Pg118 Mr. Josh Gause June 18, 2018 Page 4 of 7 As described above, our trip generation comparison and comparison of the proposed project characteristics to the assumptions from the TIA indicate that the project is consistent with the assumptions in the TIA(or would generate less traffic than that assumed in the TIA). As such, Fehr & Peers believes that the TIA appropriately accounted for the proposed project (or a conservative assumption for the proposed project) and that no additional traffic assessment is needed for the Van Daele property. The rates noted above were applied to the proposed Van Daele development and compared back to the assumptions in the TIA for peak hour conditions. Since daily trips were not measured at the Brea location, Fehr& Peers utilized the daily trip rate from the TIA to estimate daily trips. The results are summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Van Daele Project Trip Generation Comparison Van Daele Trip Generation TIA Assumption Remaining Trips South Side: South Side: AM—(296 Units x 0.47 Trips/Unit) = 139 Trips AM—682 Trips AM —.543 Trips PM—(296 Units x 0.40 Trips/Unit) = 118 Trips PM—897 Trips PM —779 Trips i Daily—(296 Units x 6.65 Trips/Unit = 1,968 Trips Daily—11,236 Daily—9,268 Total: Total: AM—1,676 Trips AM— 1,537 Trips PM—2,097 Trips PM 1,979 Trips Daily—25,183 Trips Daily—23,21 S Trips E5-6Pg119 Mr.Josh Gause June 18, 2018 Page 5 of 7 We hope this information is useful. if you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 714-941-8773. s E5-6Pg120 I e Guvti Irl k Sy10 b,.ow urd ii o k,PrI /,O kir V ork M lic,trc Iirika di 4i��K1 kur a I�1",a9(L��&�y"N�, qG M�P � '�stati�nr��B'"h NIA MU ��lW a, 1myri�,k " yw , 44 r �uy - V, " 7 94 AK wor y , IN, �r- V 9'or1k h l;arc. murex,,. ct , w �l � ;k F �A n ruptc ��a , � a f y-1Spark VNE w A, VIIN I nu.d,»a /Vt4 `aa tia` .� ^" CA,7W I✓LaFL0. ,.SLOJEC,rl '8Wfl° Ar . 17 f / VIN 1 7 P Ad r' y1. 'Wrydr J f "NUJ 16 J I1 4 N 0. y��.yNtm 4LI,';SrC �//%//N� Si t x le 4 E 4 I �f r.�:", .ax r3Lrf�urc 4 UR fir r P ,w,h hm ood({,IN rt .Ip1mgK:U ��r�rvw��,Amtam�a ,t Vilf,i dn° `Ni � r r+'i'i,w5tt�rrr rp 7C) as ay POiJ Ov-day 4th SN:O Cu~he'emal Cit adation Am lyzed InLet se ctIons E5— P 121 N3 - frm5 Ge.L - i,fiC i aaaaou r wort rii M1f 1 ., I aD4c aI......rkr Pctenelal Pedeftrlah Conncnlon(Typ.) - " CL pn , 1l PL �^+\ � LIQ � ' •��\ � ' aODNYMV r•rh.[ ' �\ / . Wry ' -N-10 CL VVV�-� tet✓\ N. Nle 65 '.il - tp nPcr CL otK LIN M9 'r I \V1 pv c.rePc 1�.3 t/ --Potential Pedestrian N•7a (y/� Connection('1'Yp•I VN lid 0 zo W 1.4 AC Imav N•76ILYYI � NSA ,1 JiECe &LAC P - ''`r�i isr� +`......:..y I ,i� ;L!U.� i t A:-,.- ` �.r-'� • r__. _ Lt's L1J nsoo i - '-..1. :rn5- ;{nr .y 3 •f'6f'i C— ... r B UJ ' a -�h��, yy 'f 2��ir(f�ll7ti�� YF ?L 'I� -+�--Potential Aedefer;an ..3 o .rt.Irl,rn•; I i 7 a3�hC�,(' �j E�j J' iConne4lo�TYR� - �At ijsr'•-�c:r i - : ii au17 f'` s �17 13 rig 9-21A VN i L O% a. - ;7 y OV VAI 4. ti 5.1E - .- 4j r �•:'�`.1 ' , _1Tl I SAAC 5- � 1'N 't t ❑: h;.; —Potential Pedestrian 1 f7 "' i_ CannecNPn(rYRfa`�% _j_ Petals Sewndary ALcesf---- !I 5-20A •! GVNv.a pL P( r + -mu .roc k €'- --- - All LEWIS CORP CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN (11.22.]7) FIGURE 2 WH,A The�R7e�,sort � -- Lew��i�s Gr o pjf�&CAponies ,� FEHRtPEERS MEMORANDUM Date: Updated June 15,2018 To: Josh Gause,Van Daele From: Jason D. Pack, P.E. Subject. Van Daele 296 Units Map.20073, Lot 4 Parking Assessment The purpose of this memorandum is to document parking information, consistent with the approved Specific Plan, for the above referenced project. Specifically, each project will 'be required to document their proposed private off-street parking, private on-street parking, and public on-street parking supply and note how it compares to the approved Specific Plan requirements. Additionally, if each project utilizes public on-street parking to satisfy their parking requirements, then this document will need to clearly identify which proposed development project will utilize the public on-street parking (e.g. no two project developments can utilize the same public on-street parking supply to satisfy their requirements). This specific memorandum is to address parking related to both the Van Daele project(located on the southeast quadrant of The Resort Parkway/61' Street intersection). Background Information The Empire Lakes Specific Plan (Section 7.3.S) identifies the approach and requirements related to parking for the entire Specific Plan. Table 7.6 (Section B), shown below, identifies the parking. requirements based on the land use designations. ES--6Pg123 JUIIE1 15, 201 Paige 2 r;,f imr �Nui /ura y yr errr-rai rrrr ( ui,/efr wq/i rr,rr0ar//rr adlal,urewa�fflll%!��✓�rr,�iri/IIIir'ru'lr�sflril rI/Z,?% //' rrarniva ,.... �. 9 �l1 rr✓ourn«ror�ck'`1SId&nr�u�mGr �uIWlrlvrurryar�arrr�enrlmu� l�,rru/rnrrrgduur�/ run, r;��armrarw rlmauilannro orf r�+uaw rran¢rir,nrrreuuan atnrauu✓ra'r�..r rrRwLra r I� I r � rli�//I�idllcrkiN!�rarl�!��"�r///lel I� eru�r'fiiF4rU�Y�N"1NU1�1all7""UVi1�iUU'lU!J�11�N",U'r�ros�rrk1�"ir'�Yd�7E11�r"�'II �� '�'�1i�A�''�uuiblrl�u�l�+1�Y� q�IU�IIr�RG'i�OI�UII�Jlx s v,�nYP r� roi�, n mug ulY >m wur aa�� i��.... ,. d��lm✓uarairuRm�maau�.° 'ry rm�ulnJ�crm,xn'rran�OndUgil/iNtiaal�ll+gvr�✓,�nvuPu, 1, fa-�nu�P�i�au�� Irrr Ardo,EMruukr+rrcnNu' f In addition to the parking standards r`eclrairecl above, the section provides multiple options related to alternative approaches to parking, shaaruld they Empire Lakes development choose to use any o these concepts, These key components are noted below, Sf1at_— I'ar—iN -- Shared p arkim exists when different uses that Beak at different tirne.s of tire clay share their facilities. For example, residential rases typically exhreruerrce their peak parking demand after 10.,07 at night, Offices, on the other, hand, are typic ally vacant at that t:irrre and tend to peak around 1(700 in the morning. ,As such, sharing parking facilities between these two uses allows for a reduced swwa rPly of parking (relative to their larking requirements if they were a stand alone i Sirnilar to un-coupled harking, a shared parking assessment would be rcrrfralred to ensurer that the correct flUr"rrber of spaces wOLIld be provided that reflect, the 'ternporal (e,g time of c�lay) parking demand of the shared rises. 5-6P 1 4 Mr.Josh Gause June 15, 2018 Page 3of6 For the Phase I development of the site, no shared parking is currently proposed, On-Street Parking -- The Specific Plan notes how excessive parking affects the livability of a community and neighborhoods. As such, all on-street parking can be utilized to satisfy the parking requirements for each project. There are two key components of on-street parking for the project site: • Private on-street parking - this includes parking along streets that are internal to each project area and will be utilized by that project to meet their parking requirements. • Public on-street parking - this includes parking that is along The Resort Parkway which will need to be "assigned" to each development project to ensure that multiple project i proposals are not"claiming" parking credit for the same public on-street parking supply. For Phase I of the project, several guest builders (similar to Van Daele) will be utilizing both private on-street parking (in addition to their garaged parking) and ,public on-street parking toward their parking supply requirements.As such,the public on-street parking along Van Daele's frontage will need to be"assigned"to that land use. The Lewis Apartments group will utilize garaged spaces and private on-street parking to satisfy their parking requirements; however, they do not need to utilize public on-street parking. Parking Tracking Information It necessary to count and assign private on-street and public on-street parking to each planning areas. The Lewis Apartment group and guest builders will use on-street parking to count toward their parking supply requirements..Counting and assigning on-street parking will ensure that no two planning areas use the same parking supply toward their parking requirements. Parking Study Requirements The Specific Plan also notes that parking studies may be.required for the following situations: • Mixed-use development • Residential development greater than 30 units/acre E5--6Pg125 Mr.Josh Gause June 15, 2018 Page 4of6 • If parking requirements identified in Table 7.6 are proposed to be reduced as part of the development • If a progressive parking management program, that could include shared parking or un- coupled parking, is proposed Un-Coupled-Parking In addition to the innovative parking approaches noted above,the Specific Plan also discusses un- coupled parking. Although not defined in the Specific Plan, discussions with City staff have indicated that the un-coupled parking component of the Specific Plan relates to use of parking spaces (on-street and off-street) in other areas of the project site; including use of The Resort Parkway. If development is to use un-coupled parking, then a study/memorandum is required to document the credit for the un-coupled parking (e.g. two different planning areas cannot "claim" the same parking supply). The Van Daele portion of the project will, be utilizing public on-street parking on The Resort Parkway to satisfy their parking requirements. As such, the purpose of this memorandum is to allocate these public on-street and parking supplies for each proposed Phase I development. Figure 1, attached to this memorandum, provides our recommendation on parking allocation by planning area.. Please note that the graphic does allocate parking on The Resort Parkway to the Lewis Apartments portion of the project. This is primarily due to the proximity of that parking to the proposed land use as, at the time this memo was prepared, the apartment project does not need that parking to meet their parking requirements. As such, those spaces could be reallocated to another user if needed in the future. Van Daele Proposed Parking Figure 2 presents the proposed parking for the Van Daele project. As shown on the figure, the project proposes to utilize the following parking spaces to exceed their parking requirements: • 21 on-street public spaces on The Resort:Parkway • 146 on-street private spaces on streets internal to their site E5-6Pg1z6 Mr.Josh Gause June 15, 2018 Page 5 of 6 • 592 garage spaces The resulting available parking results in 759 spaces allocated to the Van Daele project. This exceeds the required number of parking spaces for the project,,which is estimated to be between 711 and 752 spaces (depending on the plan options for the project). Summary and Recommendations At the time of this memorandum, project specific information is being developed for Phase I of the Empire hakes project. Parking for proposed developments in this area are utilizing private on- street parking within their parcels and public on-street parking on The Resort Parkway. As noted above, we do recommend that the graphic attached to this memorandum be used and updated in the. future (if needed) to continue tracking un-coupled parking moving forward to ensure that the parking accounting is correct for the project moving forward. We hope this information is useful. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at 714-941-8773. E5-6Pg127 ...... 14% �,. ... � FrrVa rt tt'al h M dcw,loxarY , .. k n r 5 21A I s' VN r w e s, VN 1110 W s 9� 10a ?G i ;1 19 1A; r, BYN � �"w^ ,"r x'9 dr r "� At)DO h I ( � VVY � J iWy �A� 'fk mM'm uom9_•w' g�r��M � wr' c"5rtN7r,r4� a7 yL �r,� VN `v4AC S.L9 ro U I Ar, u CONCEPTUAL EPT'UAL SITE PLAN 0 1 .22. 1 ` Unallocated as of February 2018 Parking Allocation on the Resort Parkway rid internal Streets E5-6gl8. PARKING PLAN FofiCp OI T NO5E5 — y----mo i TENTATIVETRATRACTN0.20t47 k�-- ��_ will IN INEOTv PANcxo dulq'�,W�ttaF3I'IBcPNAPpINO SCAfEOF G'C uln u 1� I Fa.ECti C3 W�3 z� '...,...:. iv_ E • �: 'ij^,� PAG7ECTBOVNCRRY '� PRDJECT BOUNDIRY 111TPARI OF TRIS _ fy�. SUB 1mAi l f �I -RESORT PARKWAY : ,A CL 6nj �.wr I y f Elf CL PRDJECT9CLIIH*Y �. PARKING CALCULATION — PRaECTBauNOARrI 1 SCALE IY FECC M4C1 IG7CPd1hF^R �,� w.wa,a LC7017.7A15 s � U--VgM The Resort @ Empire takes Public Parking Space Allocation Table The Resort Parkway•South of 6th Street As of June 27,2018 ' Parking Provided Planning Land Use Builder Project Dwelling, parking The Resort 'Parking Private" Garage Total Area Designation Name Name Units 'Required Parkway Lot(s) Streets _ Spaces Provided 5-14 CL 5-15 VN Lewis Apartment Communities Apartments S-15 VN 5-17 VN 5-18 VN TBD 5.19 Mu TBD 5-20A VN The New Home Company Condos 135 315 270 270 5-208 VN TriFointe Homes HD-SFD 80 187 8 32 160 200 5-21A VN Van Daele Homes Townhomes 80 215 6 0 40 360 206 5-210 VN Van Daele Homes Bungalows 99 264 7 0 44 198 254 5-22 CL Van Daele Hames Stacked Flats 117 7,73 8 0 57 234 299 5.23 REC Lewis Management Corp For Sale Rec Ctr 0 0 0 42 42 5.24 REC- Lewis Apartment Communities Apt RecCtr 0 0. D 0 0 Total - - '511 `_ 1254- 29- .r42 178 " '1022 1271 Total Public/Private Onstreet Designated Parking Spaces 117 Remaining Public/Private Onstreet Parking Spaces• - �'88 "-qZ :-178 Note:The Resort Parkway has 64 east side and 53 west side parking spots E5--6Pg130 RESOLUTION NO.18-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20147, A REQUEST FOR A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF THREE PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF 17.23 ACRES INTO THREE (3) PARCELS AND FOUR (4) LETTER LOTS LOCATED WITHIN THE EMPIRE LAKES SPECIFIC PLAN, PLANNING AREA 1, LOCATED NORTH OF 4TH STREET, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET,WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE,AND EAST OF UTICA/CLEVELAND AVENUES.THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE PROJECT SITE IS SOUTH OF 6TH STREET AND EAST OF THE FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF THE RESORT PARKWAY (FORMERLY REFERRED TO AS THE VINE),AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:0210-102-04. A. Recitals. 1. Van Daele Homes, Inc. filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20147 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the.subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of August 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning . Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on August 8, 2018 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a lot located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street,west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway; and b. The project site has an area of 17.23 acres with a street frontage of about 310 feet along 6th Street. It will be bound on the west by the future, north-south primary street("The Resort Parkway") of the overall project. Following the construction of that street, the site will have a frontage along that street of 2,100 feet; and E5--6Pg131 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-50 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20147-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 2 C. The property is currently vacant. The site has been"mass"graded to prepare it for development. Currently, underground utility infrastructure is being installed beneath what will eventually be the right-of-way for The Resort Parkway; and d. The General Pian Land Use designation of the project site and the properties surrounding the subject property is Mixed Use; and e. The properties to the north, south and west are also within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1 and are vacant. The property to the east is within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Areas 6 and 8, and is developed with an apartment complex; and f. The application is for the subdivision of the project site into three(3)parcels of 5.25 acres, 3.78 acres, and 6.76 acres (Lots 1, 2, and 3 respectively) and four (4) "letter" lots (Lots "A" through"D"). The fetter lots will be for an interior street(Lot"A"), open spaces/common areas(Lots "B"through "D"); and g. The related Design Review application, DRC2017-00925, proposes the construction of 296 residential units; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The design and layout of the subject tentative tract map will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Empire Lakes Specific Plan. The project site is being subdivided to facilitate the development of a residential project which will be consistent with the Mixed Use zoning of the project site. b. The site is physically suitable for the subdivision which will create three (3) parcels and four (4) "letter" lots. The project will include collector streets and will be designed to accommodate the level of traffic proposed by the development. C, The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The applicant's environmental consultant, Psomas, prepared an Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum dated June 28, 2018 that demonstrated that the subject project is within the scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the Final E1R. d. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed project is for the development of 296 residential units. The applicant's environmental consultant, Psomas, prepared an Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum dated June 28, 2018 that demonstrated that the subject project is within the scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the Final EIR. e. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. Access to the property will be from existing public streets surrounding the project site and access to the individual future homes will be from a newly created private streets which will run on land that is currently a part of the subject property. E5-6Pg132 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-50 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20147-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on May 18, 2016 (SCH No. 2015041083) in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00114,Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040,and Development Code Amendment DRC2015- 00115. Pursuant to CEQA, no subsequent or supplemental El or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii)new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR is required, the applicant's environmental consultant, Psomas, prepared an Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum dated June 28, 2018. Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the Final EIR identified above and no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map 20147 and Design Review DRC2017-00925. Substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous EIR. The previous environmental review analyzed the effects of the proposed project. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions incorporated herein by this reference, Planning Department 1) Approval is for a request for a subdivision of a property of about 17.23 acres into three parcels and four letter lots located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway (formerly referred to as The Vine); APN:0210-102-04. E5-6Pg133 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-50 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20147-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho-Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August 2018, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E5--6Pg134 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project#: SUB17#20147 #20147 Project t`laraae: Empire Lakes-The Resort _.�...__. ._.�..�..__._______ ......._.w. Location,, - 020027220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map �.... ,ALL OFTHE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO, YOUR PROJECT: plena n l r rrl t 'lease be advised of the following SpeTial Conditions 1. Spanish Style buildings- -The wall rnaterials are required to be: reed: Urn sand float stucco finish (10/20) per page 7-110 of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, -The foam trirn shall be high density foam trina with fine sand float stuccos finish (20/30) or smooth marruifactured foam trirn per page. 7115 of the Empire Lakes Specific flan. - The roof color shall be a natural dray color or terra cotta color per page 7-115 of the Empire Lakes Specific Flan. 2, Heritage Style RegUirernenhs- -mh-1°ae walls shall be finished with a medium sand float stucco finish ('16/20) per page 7-105 of tl°ae Empire Lakes Specific plan (where stucco is proposed only), -Thee protect: is required to have window grids on all upper levels per page 7-105 of the Empire Lakes Specific flan. -The project is requuired to have, parceled front entry doors and paneled garage doors with windows per page 7-105 of the Ernpire Lakes Specific Flan. standard Conditions of Approval 3. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/jot and a pall box to connect to the street. Provide interior structuured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 0 capper wire, Radio Grade Ca coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel prior to release of Occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTI-B), Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits, 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his scale expertise any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, becaurse of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The uappficant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sidle discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall, not relieve ;applicant of his obligations under this condition. , Copies of the signed! Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall) be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved' in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed'/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 0, The applicant shall' be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Determination fee in the amount of $00.00. AH checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. wurw.citydofi�r..0 6'�''ai��rec9.7/30/20'1 8 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 9. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 11. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 13. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations and the Empire Lakes Specific Plan. 14. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 15. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for- Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 17. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. Printed:7/30/2018 • www.CityofRC.us ?age 2 of 14 E5-6Pg136 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Departrnent Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All of the conditions of SUBTT20073 shall be satisfied prior to the final map or building permit, whichever occurs first. 2. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 3. 1. Construct the full width improvements of The Resort Parkway from 4th Street to 6th Street, including all traffic signals, signing, striping, curb, gutter, street lights, and sidewalk. "The Resort Parkway" frontage improvements shall be in accordance with Empire Lakes Specific Plan as required and including: A. Provide curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drive approaches, table top pedestrian crossings, signing, and striping as required. Coordinate with City staff for street light design and installation requirements. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. C. All public improvements including access ramps shall be constructed to the latest ADA standards. D. Roundabout shall be in accordance with FHWA guidelines. E. The temporary 'Resort Parkway" along the easement in the remainder parcel shall be constructed and open prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Install frontage improvements and median improvements along 4th Street and 6th Street. 4th Street and 6th Street frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial' standards and Empire Lakes Specific Plan as required and including: A. Provide, protect, or, repair existing curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, cycle tracks, signing, and striping as required. B. Provide traffic signals at 4th Street/"The Resort Parkway", 6th Street/'The Resort Parkway", and 6th Street/Cleveland Avenue and related equipment including traffic signal interconnect to Utica Avenue and to Milliken Avenue. Provide a traffic signal maintenance easement as required. City shall maintain the traffic signals and related equipment only after funded by CFD. C. Remove and reconstruct the median for 'The Resort Parkway" intersection, and provide full intersection improvements including single eastbound and westbound left turn movements. D. All public improvements including access ramps shall be constructed to the latest ADA standards. 4. Development impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits per the Engineering Fee Schedule. Note that fees are subject to change annually. Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 6. An ingress and egress easements shall for private streets shall be reserved on the final map. 7. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of--way shall be dedicated to the City. Printed:7/3012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 14 E5-6Pg137 Project#>`: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: En ineerinc, Cervices DenartnPen± Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 9. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final map. 10. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 11. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 12, Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 13. Dedication shall be made to the City for roadway purposes of Lot A (the entirety of The Resort Parkway) of Tract Map 20073. The total dedication on 6th Street measured from street centerline shall be 60 feet. 14. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building p&mit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and 1 or demolition project. Contact Susan Shaker, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall 1 Engineering 1 Environmental Programs 1 Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 15. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: 17. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that `show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed;7!3012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 at 14 E5-6Pg138 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: -020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Enaineerina Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 18. "Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 11/4" innerducts in one of the 4" conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each parcel or building (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first." 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Bike Trail Storm Drain 20. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed:7/30/2018 www•CityofRC.us Page 5 of 14 E5-5Pg139 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ER-gineering Centices Denartmenfi Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed:7130/2018 WWW.CityofRC.us Page a of 14 E5-6Pg140 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: -020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 23. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 24. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 25. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 26. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 27. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. www.CityofRC.us Printed:713012018 Page 7 of 14 E5-6Pg141 i Project#. SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 29. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 30. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 31. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, drive aisles, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 32. On the final map, provide non-vehicular access for the following streets, except for approved openings: The Resort Parkway 6th Street Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Building & Fire Standard Conditions of Approval When the .Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local B&S and RCFPD ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Base on Occupancy the buildings are required to be equipped with sprinkler monitored and or a fire alarm. Aerial ladder and roof access must be provided from a 26' wide fire lane and coordinated with the landscape plans to avoid trees. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Printed;713012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 at 14 E5-6Pg142 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1, Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and. Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi-family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within mufti-family developments shall include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. Printed:7/34/2018 www.CifyofRC.us page 9 0(1 d 1=5-6Pg143 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: -020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradin, Secti-_r, Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 18, All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way ("The Resort Parkway") must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 19. Prior to-"issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. Printed:713012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 14 E5--6Pg144 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 24. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 27. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 4.106.4. 30. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 31. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WD1D). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. Printed:7130/2018 www.CityofRC.us page 11 of 14 E5-6Pg145 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Sectior. Standard Conditions of Approval 32. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 35. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 36. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 37. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 38. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Pian which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. if the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. Printed:7I3012018 vrww.CityofRC.us page 12 of 14 E5-6Pg146 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: -020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 40. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 41. Prior to approval of the final project-specific; water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 42. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water .drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 43. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the City Engineer, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Engineering Cucamonga En g g ng Services Department. 44. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed:7!3012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 14 E6--6Pgl47 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: -020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Mrading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 45. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section X1.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. Printed:7/30/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 14 E5--6Pg148 i RESOLUTION NO.18-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE 'PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF 296 UNITS CONSISTING OF BUNGALOWS,TOWNHOMES, AND FLATS ON MULTIPLE PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF 17.23 ACRES WITHIN THE EMPIRE LAKES SPECIFIC PLAN, PLANNING AREA 1, LOCATED NORTH OF 4TH STREET, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND EAST OF UTICA/CLEVELAND AVENUES.THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE PROJECT SITE IS SOUTH OF 6TH STREET AND EAST OF THE FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF THE RESORT PARKWAY (FORMERLY REFERRED TO AS THE VINE), AND MAKINGS FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN:0210-102-04. A. Recitals. 1. Van Daele Homes, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2017- 00925 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Design Review is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of August 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that a[]the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on August-8, 2018 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a project site located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street,west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway; and b. The project site has an area of 17.23 acres with a street frontage cif about 310 feet along 6th Street. It will be bound on the west by the future, north-south primary street("The Resort Parkway") of the overall project. Following the construction of that street, the site will- have a frontage along that street of 2,100 feet; and E5--6Pg149 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-51 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 2 G. The property is currently vacant. The site has been"mass"graded to prepare it for development. Currently, underground utility infrastructure is being installed beneath what will eventually be the right-of-way for The Resort Parkway; and d. The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site and the properties surrounding the subject property is Mixed Use; and e. The properties to the north, south and west are also within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1 and are vacant. The property to the east is within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Areas 6 and 8, and is developed with an apartment complex; and f. The application is for the site plan and architectural review of 296 residential units consisting of bungalows, townhomes and stacked flats; and g. The applicant has elected to use "Spanish", "Contemporary", and "Heritage" themes for the bungalows, stack flats, and townhomes, respectively; and h. The project consists of 296 single-family residential units as follows: 99 bungalows, 80 townhomes and 117 stacked flats. The floor area of each unit type will be between 1,464-1,536 square feet(bungalow), 1,503-1,853 square feet(townhome), and 1,296-1,798 square feet(stack flats); and i. The required density for the project within place types,Village Neighborhood (VN) and Core Living (CL), is 16-28 du/acre and 18-35 du/acre respectively. Together, as an overall project,the dwelling units per acre equate to 18.75 units which is above the minimum.for both place types; and j. Each residence is required to have two or three parking spaces with each space being 10 feet by 20 feet. The applicant is proposing a two-car garage with the required dimensions for every proposed home. The applicant is also proposing guest parking. All required parking standards are proposed to be met; and k. The minimum area for private open space (150 square feet) has been exceeded with each unit having an average of 247 square feet of private open space. Numerous courtyards are a prominent feature of the project. A dog park (645 square feet) an outdoor play area (1,240 square feet), an"Al Fresco"dining area (404 square feet), a plaza area(1,880 square feet), an open turf area (9,800 square feet) and a rose garden (1,295 square feet) are all proposed within the project. Residents of building types will have direct access to these open space amenities; and 1. All streets within the interior of the project will be private, i.e. maintained by a homeowner's association. However, these streets will be open to the public (non-residents of the project). Primary vehicular access into the project will be private street connections to The Resort Parkway at various locations. As the presence of gates and fences will be minimal,external access by pedestrians, bicyclists, etc. generally will be available at a variety of locations; and m. The related Tentative Tract Map application, SUBTT20147, proposes the subdivision of the project site into three(3) parcels of 5.25 acres,3.78 acres, and 6.76 acres(Lots 1, 2, and 3 respectively) and four (4) "letter" lots (Lots "A" through "D"). The letter lots will be for an interior street (Lot "A"), open spaces/common areas (Lots "B" through "D"). E5-6Pg150 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-51 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 3 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The proposal is to construct a mix of different types of residences which is consistent with the underlying General Plan designation of Mixed Use. b. The proposed development is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the surrounding area. The land use that would be associated with this project is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is Mixed Use(MU), Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1 which allows the construction of residential units. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code, the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, and the area in which it is located. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Empire Lakes Specific Plan. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. d. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is currently vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Mixed Use and is in Planning Area 1 which allows for the development of different types of residential units. Furthermore, the applicant's environmental consultant, Psomas, prepared an Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum dated June 28, 2018 that demonstrated that the subject project is within the scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the Final EIR. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(":CEQX) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,the City certified an Environmental Impact Report(EIR)on May 18,2016(SCH No. 2015041083) in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. Pursuant to CEQA, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. E5-6Pg151 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-51 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 4 To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR is required, the applicant's environmental consultant, Psomas, prepared an Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum dated June 28,2018. Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the Final EIR identified above and no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map 20147 and Design Review DRC2017-00925. Substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous EIR. The previous environmental review analyzed the effects of the proposed project. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a site plan and architectural review of 296 units consisting of bungalows, townhomes, and flats on multiple parcels with a combined area of 17.23 acres within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway (formerly referred to as The Vine); APN:0210-102-04. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August 2018, by the following vote-to-wit: E5--6Pg 152 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-51 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E5--6Pg153 RESOLUTION NO.18-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF 296 UNITS CONSISTING OF BUNGALOWS,TOWNHOMES, AND FLATS ON MULTIPLE PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF 17.23 ACRES WITHIN THE EMPIRE LAKES SPECIFIC PLAN, PLANNING AREA 1, LOCATED NORTH OF 4TH STREET, SOUTH OF 6TH STREET, WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE, AND EAST OF UTICA/CLEVELAND AVENUES.THE SPECIFIC LOCATION OF THE PROJECT SITE IS SOUTH OF 6TH STREET AND EAST OF THE FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF THE RESORT PARKWAY (FORMERLY REFERRED TO AS THE VINE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN:0210-102-04. A. Recitals. 1. Van Daele Homes, Inc.filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2017- 00925 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Design Review is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of August 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on August 8, 2018 including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a project site located within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street,west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway; and b. The project site has an area of 17.23 acres with a street frontage of about 310 feet along 6th Street. It will be bound on the west by the future, north-south primary street("The Resort Parkway ) of the overall project. Following the construction of that street, the site will have a frontage along that street of 2,100 feet; and E5-6Pg154 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-51 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 2 C. The property is currently vacant. The site has been"mass"graded to prepare it for development. Currently, underground utility infrastructure is being installed beneath what will eventually be the right-of-way for The Resort Parkway; and d. The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site and the properties surrounding the subject property is Mixed Use; and e. The properties to the north, south and west are also within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1 and are vacant. The property to the east is within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Areas 6 and 8, and is developed with an apartment complex; and f. The application is for the site plan and architectural review of 296 residential units consisting of bungalows, townhomes and stacked flats; and g. The applicant has elected to use "Spanish", "Contemporary", and "Heritage" themes for the bungalows, stack flats, and townhomes, respectively; and h. The project consists of 296 single-family residential units as follows: 99 bungalows, 80 townhomes and 117 stacked flats. The floor area of each unit type will be between 1,464-1,536 square feet(bungalow), 1,503--1,853 square feet(townhome), and 1,296-1,798 square feet(stack flats); and i. The required density for the project within place types,Village Neighborhood (VN) and Core Living (CL), is 16-28 du/acre and 18-35 du/acre respectively. Together, as an overall project, the dwelling units per acre equate to 18.75 units which is above the minimum for both place types; and j. Each residence is required to have two or three parking spaces with each space being 10 feet by 20 feet. The applicant is proposing a two-car garage with the required dimensions for every proposed home. The applicant is also proposing guest parking. All required parking standards are proposed to be met; and k. The minimum area for private open space (150 square feet) has been exceeded with each unit having an average of 247 square feet of private open space. Numerous courtyards are a prominent feature of the project. A dog park (645 square feet) an outdoor play area (1,240 square feet), an"Al Fresco"dining area (404 square feet), a plaza area (1,880 square feet),an,open turf area (9,800 square feet) and a rose garden (1,295 square feet) are all proposed within the project. Residents of building types will have direct access to these open space amenities; and 1. All streets within the interior of the project will be private, i.e. maintained by a homeowner's association. However, these streets will be open to the public (non-residents of the project). Primary vehicular access into the project will be private street connections to The Resort Parkway at various locations. As the presence of gates and fences will be minimal external access by pedestrians, bicyclists, etc, generally will be available at a variety of locations; and m. The related Tentative Tract Map application, SUBTT20147, proposes the subdivision of the project site into three (3) parcels of 5.25 acres, 3.78 acres, and 6.76 acres(Lots 1, 2, and 3 respectively) and four (4) "letter" lots (Lots "A" through "W). The letter lots will be for an interior street (Lot"A"), open spaces/common areas (Lots "B" through "D"). E5-6Pg155 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-51 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 3 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this.Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The proposal is to construct a mix of different types of residences which is consistent with the underlying General Plan designation of Mixed Use. b. The proposed development is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the surrounding area. The land use that would be associated with this project is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is Mixed Use(MU), Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1 which allows the construction of residential units. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code, the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, and the area in which it is located. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Empire Lakes Specific Plan. The proposed development meets-all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. d. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is currently vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Mixed Use and is in Planning Area 1 which allows for the development of different types of residential units. Furthermore, the applicant's environmental consultant, Psomas, prepared an Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum dated June 28, 2018 that demonstrated that the subject project is within the scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the Final EIR'. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City certified an Environmental Impact Report(EIR) on May 18, 2016 (SCH No. 2015041083) in connection with the City's approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00114,Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015- 00115. Pursuant to CEQA, no subsequent.or supplemental EER or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. E5--6Pg156 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-51 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 4 To demonstrate that no subsequent EIR is required, the applicant's environmental consultant, Psomas, preparers an Environmental Technical Analysis Memorandum dated une 28, 2018. Staff evaluated this memorandum and concluded that the project is within the scope of the approved overall project and analysis included in the Final EIR identified above and no additional environmental.review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map 20147 and Design Review DRC2017-00925. Substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous EIR. The previous environmental review analyzed the effects of the proposed project. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached Standard Conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a site plan and architectural review of 296 units consisting of bungalows, townhomes, and flats on multiple parcels with a combined area of 17.23 acres within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. The specific location of the project site is south of 6th Street and east of the future alignment of The Resort Parkway (formerly referred to as The Vine); APN:0210-102-04. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Rich Macias, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary 1, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of August 2018, by the following vote-to-wit: E5-6Pg157 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-51 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00925-VAN DAELE HOMES, INC. August 8, 2018 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E5--6Pg 158 Community Development Department Project##. SU TT##20147 Project Marne Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: _ 02027220-0000 ._... _�,.._�. .� .. ..�. ._._. —______...� .._ Project.Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF' THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: PIa ntM'rl De rtm Please beadvised of the following Special Conditions 1, Spanish Style buildings- -The wall t-materials are required to be rner.:lirrm saird float stucco finish (16120) per page 7-115 of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan. -The foarn trim shall be high density fc'aarn trin°a with fine sand float stucco finish (20/30) or smooth manufactured foam,trim per page 7-115 of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan. - The roof color shall be a natural relay color or, terra cotta color fuer page 7-115 of the E rnpire Lakes Specifics Plan. 2, Heritage Style Requirements- -The walls shall be finished with a medium sand, float stu»rCCO finish (15/20) per page 7-1015 of the Empire Lakes Specific plan (where stucco is proposed only), -The ;project is required to have window grids on all rapper levels per parte 7-105 of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan. -The project is required to have paneled front entry doors and paneled garage doors with windows per paage, 7-105 of the Ernpire Lakes Specific Plan, Standard conditions of Approval 3. For all residential developiraent, provide corrcluit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior Structured wiring for each, house/building with minimrlrra Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable„ and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy' (fiber-to-the building, FTT13). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expertise any action brought against the City„ its agents officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for, any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a rest.dt of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant: of his obligations under this condition . Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolcrtion of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are riot required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of F=ish and Wildlife Notice of Determination fee in the amount of $50.00, All, checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing,. Printed,rrN�c�N18 v/,vvw.C'0yofRC.us E5-6Pg15g Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: -020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 9. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 10. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 11. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 13. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations and the Empire Lakes Specific Plan. 14. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination' of concrete-or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 15. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 16. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 17. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. Printed:7/30/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 14 E5-6Pg160 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: -020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning TleP,— . n% Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All of the conditions of SUBTT20073 shall be satisfied prior to the final map or building permit, whichever occurs first. 2. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 3. 1. Construct the full width improvements of The Resort Parkway from 4th Street to 6th Street, including all traffic signals, signing, striping, curb, gutter, street lights, and sidewalk. "The Resort Parkway" frontage improvements shall be in accordance with Empire Lakes Specific Plan as required and including: A. Provide curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drive approaches, table top pedestrian crossings, signing, and striping as required. Coordinate with City staff for street light design and installation requirements. B. Driveways shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. C. All public improvements including access ramps shall be constructed to the latest ADA standards. D. Roundabout shall be in accordance with FHWA guidelines. E. The temporary 'Resort Parkway" along the easement in the remainder parcel shall be constructed and open prior to issuance of building permits. 2. 'Install frontage improvements and median improvements along 4th Street and 6th Street. 4th Street and 6th Street frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards and Empire Lakes Specific Plan as required and including: A. Provide, protect, or, repair existing curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights, cycle tracks, signing, and striping as required. B. Provide traffic signals at 4th Street/"The Resort Parkway", 6th Street/"The Resort Parkway", and 6th Street/Cleveland Avenue and related equipment including traffic signal interconnect to Utica Avenue and to Milliken Avenue. Provide a traffic signal maintenance easement as required. City shall maintain the traffic signals and related equipment only after funded by CFD. C. Remove and reconstruct the median for "The Resort Parkway" intersection, and provide full intersection improvements including single eastbound and westbound left turn movements. D. All public improvements including access ramps shall be constructed to the latest ADA standards. 4. Development impact fees are due prior to issuance of building permits per the Engineering Fee Schedule. Note that fees are subject to change annually. Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 6. An ingress and egress easements shall for private streets shall be reserved on the final map. 7. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. www.CilyofRC.us Primed:7/30/2018 Page 3 of 14 E5-6Pg161 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ngjneer iriq ver v lces Dej3ar l<ri eel Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 9. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final map. 10. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 11. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 12. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 13. Dedication shall be made to the City for roadway purposes of Lot A (the entirety of The Resort Parkway) of Tract Map 20073. The total dedication on 6th Street measured from street centerline shall be 60 feet. 14. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and 1 or demolition project, Contact Susan Shaker, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall 1 Engineering / Environmental Programs/ Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 15. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: 17. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed:7/3012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 14 E5-6Pg162 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: -020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Pnnineerinn Services Departmen} Standard Conditions of Approval 18. "Developer shall install a dark fiber conduit package fronting the development. Two 4" Schedule 40 PVC conduits, along with three 1 W innerducts in one of the 4 conduits, per City Standard 145, with connection through the parkway to each parcel or building (fiber-to-the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits or final map approval, whichever comes first." 19. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Bike Trail Storm Drain 20. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by - these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed:713012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 74 E5--6Pg163 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed:713012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 14 E5--6Pg164 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineerina Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet 1." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to,be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only, 23. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 24. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 25. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 26. Developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. 27. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. �vww.CityofRC.us Printed;7/30/2018 Page 7 of 14 E5--6Pg165 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type. Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Emp-ineerinn CervicA,c Ilenar#mon± Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 29. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 30. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 31. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, drive aisles, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 32. On the final map, provide nonvehicular access for the following streets, except for approved openings: The Resort Parkway 6th Street Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Building & Fire Standard Conditions of Approval When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local B&S and RCFPD ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Base on Occupancy the buildings are required to be equipped with sprinkler monitored and or a fire alarm. Aerial ladder and roof access must be provided from a 26' wide fire lane and coordinated with the landscape plans to avoid trees. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Printed:713012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 0{14 E5-6Pg166 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: -020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading flans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to the issuance of a grading plan for multi-family projects, the private streets and drive aisles within multi-family developments shall include street plans as park of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. The private street plan view shall show typical street sections. The private street profile view shall show the private street/drive aisle centerline. Printed:713912018 www.CityafRC.us Page 9 of 14 E5-6Pg167 Project#: SUBTT##20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Cr rading Car±fnn Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 18. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way ("The Resort Parkway") must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.31CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.21CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.21CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage pian set. Printed:7I3012018 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 14 E5-6Pg168 I Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and seated by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 24. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on theradin and 9 g drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 27. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 4.106.4. 30. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 31. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. Printed:7!3012018 www.CltyofRC.us Page 11 of 14 E5-6Pg169 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain an a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 35. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 36. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 37. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 38. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include- executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. Printed:7130!2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 14 F5-6Pgl70 Project##: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 40. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H. Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII -- Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table V11.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 41. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 42. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 43. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy"by the City Engineer, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 44. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed.'7/3 /2018 Page 13 of 14 E5-5Pg171 Project#: SUBTT#20147 Project Name: Empire Lakes-The Resort Location: - 020927220-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: GriaJirla Sensori Standard Conditions of Approval 45. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the 'San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives, b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. Printed;713012018 www•CityofRC.us Page 14 of 14 E5--6Pg172