Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-07-11 - Agenda Packet - PC-HPCr9*_17�0 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. — CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca Vice Chairman Macias Commissioner Guglielmo Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 13, 2018 C2. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 27, 2018 Page 1 of 7 ro*-,7�0 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D. SCHEDULED MATTERS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. D1. SELECTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION/PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OFFICER POSITIONS D2. SELECTION OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBERS D3. SELECTION OF THE COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. E1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL —A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Page 2of7 ro*-,7�0 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to establish a 968 square foot automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Page 3of7 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 AND JUNE 27, 2018. E7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2013-00229 - ST. YOSTINA CHURCH - A request to add 2,390 square feet of floor area to an existing 4,849 square foot church in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, on the west side of Sapphire Street south of Lemon Avenue, located at 6386 Sapphire Street; APN: 1062-332-25. Related Files: Minor Design Review DRC2013- 00230. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers minor additions to existing developments. E8. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00230 - ST. YOSTINA CHURCH - A request to add 2,390 square feet of floor area to an existing 4,849 square foot church and the addition of 76 parking spaces to an existing 54 space parking lot in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, on the west side of Sapphire Street south of Lemon Street, located at 6386 Sapphire Street; APN: 1062-332-25. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2013-00229. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, which covers minor additions to existing developments, and the project qualifies as a Class 11 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15311, which covers the construction of small parking lots. E9. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2018-00387 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH - A request to modify previously approved Conditional Use Permit 84-37 to allow the construction of a self-service vacuum area with 19 new self-service stalls under an overhead canopy of 4,320 square feet in the Community Page 4 of 7 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet west of Haven at 10340 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 1077- 401-48. Related File: Site Development Review DRC2018-00260. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. E10. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2018-00260- CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH - A request to construct a 4,320 -square foot solar canopy structure over a self-service vacuum area with 19 new self-service stalls in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet west of Haven Avenue at 10340 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 1077-401- 48. Related File: Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2018-00387. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. E11. VARIANCE DRC2017-01020 - MAYELA YIBALE - A request for a Variance to allow a one car attached garage and a one car detached garage for a proposed 1,740 square foot, two-story single-family residence on a vacant parcel of 5,072 square feet in the Low (L) Residential District, on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN:0209-103-33. Related Files: Variance DRC2017-00552 and Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. E12. VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 - MAYELA YIBALE —A request for a Variance to allow a reduced side yard setback for a proposed 1,740 square foot, two-story single-family residence with a one car attached garage and a one car detached garage on a vacant parcel of 5,072 square feet in the Low (L) Residential District, on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN:0209-103-33. Related Files: Variance DRC2017-01020 and Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. E13. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 — MAYELA YIBALE — A request to construct a 1,740 -square foot, two-story single-family residence with a one car attached garage and a one car detached garage on a vacant parcel of 5,072 square feet in the Low (L) Residential District, on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN:0209- Page 5 of 7 i r9*_17�0 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 103-33. Related Files: Variance DRC2017-01020 and Variance DRC2017-00552. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) a under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: G. ADJOURNMENT I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, July 05, 2018, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. 4.5 Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 6of7 JULY 11, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,793 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 7of7 Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting July 11, 2018 El 1 rL C) Q 2 2 ! a 1 � 1 t 19 PT R �i Base Line Church Footl Arro v a O � N C7 6 z a E7&E8 4th E1 -E6 E9&E1a E1 -E6 -GPA, ZMA, DR, CUP, & VAR -Archibald Oil E7 & E8 -CUP & MDR -St. Yostina Church E9 & E10 -CUP & SDR -Deer Creek Car Wash E11 -E13 -VAR, VAR, MDR-Mayela Yibale E Z Line urch Foothill N B � Arrow 6th EII I -E13 4th Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive JUNE 132 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. — CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca x Vice Chairman Macias _x_ Commissioner Guglielmo _x_ Commissioner Munoz _x_ Commissioner Wimberly _x_ Additional Staff Present Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney, Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, Brian Sandona. Associate Engineer, Dominick Perez, Associate Planner, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, Mike Smith. Senior Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Joseph Talon, President of the Alta Loma Riding Club spoke in reference to the Equestrian Overly and noted that for Time Extension DRC2018-00319, certain mitigation fees are required. He said the equestrian plan may be no longer be viable and suggested the fees may not be usable and therefore asked the Time Extension to be denied and that we revert back to the Equestrian Overlay. Page 1 of 8 C1—Pg 1 JUNE 13, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Desiree (last name unknown) located at 6563 East Avenue said she has a historic home and asked to have events at the location. Staff will meet with her to answer her questions regarding the request. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of May 23, 2018 Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Macias, carried 5-0 to adopt the Consent Calendar as presented. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00319 - GOLDEN MEADOWLAND, LLC. AND RANCH HAVEN, LLC. - A request for a fifth 1 -year time extension for a previously approved tentative tract map (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072) to subdivide 150.79 acres into 358 lots in the Low (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Residential District, with an average density of 2.3 dwelling units per acre for the entire project, in the Upper Etiwanda Neighborhood of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, located at the northeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue. APN: 1087-081-12, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, & 24. Staff has found the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by City Council in June 16, 2004 by Resolution 04-204 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report. Page 2 of 8 Cl -Pg 2 I JUNE 133 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Dominick Perez, Associate Planner gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted 3 revisions made to the staff report. He said some dates were incorrect and the revisions are before the Commissioners on the dais. John Schafer, representing the property owner said they are very close to finalizing their final conditions before moving forward on the project. Chairman Oaxaca noted a Development Agreement from years past and asked the status of that agreement. Mr. Perez said the agreement had an approval period that has since expired and is no longer applicable. Chairman Oaxaca asked what the City's process would be. Mr. Perez said the requirements are no longer applicable but some are. He said it is not being discussed at this time. Chairman Oaxaca noted the report said there are 6 remaining conditions to be completed. Mr. Perez said the biological resource mitigation measure is being addressed and the other 5 are Engineering related. Chairman Oaxaca asked if acquiring offsite mitigation land is a requirement. Mr. Perez noted the applicant is still pursuing the completion of that mitigation measure. He said they appear to be on track to acquire those lands. Chairman Oaxaca asked if they do not complete the mitigation before the end of the extension period would they have to resubmit. Mr. Perez said that is correct. Commissioner Munoz confirmed the Map Act gives them the right to seek the extension. Mr. Perez said correct. Page 3 of 8 C1—Pg 3 JUNE 13, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and hearing and seeing no comment, closed the public hearing. Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney/clarified the issue regarding the mitigation for the equestrian center. He said that within this tract/each lot is required to pay a mitigation fee. The Ciity would use these fees to build the equestrian center. To date, there is not enough money to develop the center but the money has to be specifically used for an equestrian center. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Guglielmo, carried 5-0 to adopt the Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2018-00319. D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015- 00683 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208- 291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED D3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED D4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) Page 4 of 8 C1 -Pg 4 W JUNE 13, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED D5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to establish a 968 square foot automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED D6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED D7. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Page 5 of 8 C1—Pg 5 JUNE 13, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291- 05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- 00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED Items D2 -D7 were heard concurrently as they are all related to the same application Tom Grahn, Associate Planner gave a brief report noting the applicant has requested a continuance in order to allow time to resolve comments received regarding the environmental documents, specifically related to hazardous waste and the model used for SCAQMD. The Applicant's representative has responded to the comments and we are waiting for a response from the Department of Toxic Substances Control and the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Tim Guerrero, Arrow Route 9759 Arrow Route said he opposes the request because the area draws homeless persons and a gas station will attract more transient related nuisances. Jai Keith said he lives at the corner of Hermosa and Arrow Route. He said he owns Liquor Paradise across from Deer Creek Carwash. He said staff assured him the property was zoned for homes and would never be a gas station again. He said they experience break-ins and find used needles. He said the station would put fumes next to a school. He said there are several nearby stations with car washes. He asked why we would allow this and kill others who have the same business. He said the City would be responsible if kids get hurt. Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. Commisioner Munoz assured the speakers that the Commission would not be making a decision tonight and that the hearing will remain open and that all testimony will be considered when the item is brought back at the next meeting before a decision is made. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to continue the item to the regular meeting of June 27. 2018. Page 6 of 8 C1 -Pg 6 JUNE 13, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: Commissioner Munoz gave election updates discussed at the League of California Cities. He said Prop 68, a $4 billion park/water bond passed and we are hoping some grant money will come back to our City for Central Park. He said Prop 69 also passed, it offers constitutional protection of money set aside for the specific purpose to rehabilitate roads. He also noted Prop 72 which provides exemptions to homeowners who install recapture water systems. He said these are all "wins" for cities. He said they also met regarding 3 telecommunications bills with respect to "Net Neutrality' - he said it has been put on a watch basis -the League neither opposes or supports it. He said most peoph are not wanting to increase taxes and therefore they will monitor the climate for the next few months. He said the League approved a drone policy that would support minimum State standards. He said it received strong approval from the representatives on the committee and he would forward th, information to staff for their use. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: Commissioner Munoz noted that tomorrow is Flag Day and we should be cognizant of what it represents. G. ADJOURNMENT I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 7, 2018, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. 7:35 P.M 4.5 Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION Page 7 of 8 C1 -Pg 7 JUNE 13, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Page 8of8 C1—Pg 8 JUNE 27, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 7:00 P.M. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca x Vice Chairman Macias _x_ Commissioner Guglielmo _x_ Commissioner Munoz _x_ Commissioner Wimberly _x B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Suket Doyal, 9755 B. Arrow Route spoke about items D1 -D5 Archibald Oil and gave a brief history of the site noting the prior zoning of Low Medium Residential, within % mile there is another station with a car wash, and its adjacent to a school. He noted affordable housing might be better. He asked that the Commission prohibit the sale of alcohol and cigarettes or make it residential. Jai Keith, 10075 Arrow Route stated he is the son of a business owner near this proposed gas station. He noted there are 7 stations within 1 mile. He said there is a concern with homeless persons on their property and related drug trade. He believes that another station may increase that activity. He said his family tried to acquire this property before and were refused because of the zoning. Page 1 of 7 C2—Pg 1 JUNE 275 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. NONE D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018. D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: APNs: 0208- 291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016- 00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Page 2 of 7 C2—Pg 2 JUNE 27, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018. D3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL —A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018. D4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 — ARCHIBALD OIL —A request to establish a 968 square foot automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13,201& D5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291- 05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- Page 3 of 7 C2—Pg 3 F JUNE 279 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018. D6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 13, 2018 Chairman Oaxaca noted the request in the staff report for a continuance to July 11, 2018. He noted the public hearing is still open from the meeting of June 13, 2018. He invited any interested public to make comment at this time. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner gave a brief report noting comments have still not been received and staff recommends the applications be continued to July 11, 2018. Hearing and seeing no comment, he asked for a motion regarding the continuance request. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, carried 5-0 to continue the applications to the regular meeting of July 11, 2018. D7. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2015-00118 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A review of a proposed Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and SC Rancho Development Corp. and Empire Lakes Holding Company, LLC, for a previously approved mixed use, high density development (Empire Lakes/The Resort) in Planning Area 1 (PA1), a property of about 160 acres located north of 4th Street, south of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railway, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues, within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan; APNs: 0209-272-20, 0210-082-91 through 93. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00040, and Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH No. 20150410083) and Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Program Page 4 of 7 C2—Pg 4 JUNE 279 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA (MMRP) was reviewed and certified by the City Council on May 18, 2016. Section 15162 of the California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review is required for a previously certified EIR or for subsequent projects within the scope of a prior EIR. The Development Agreement is a contract governing timelines, terms, and conditions regarding development of Empire Lakes/The Resort and does not raise or create new environmental impacts that were not previously contemplated in the EIR. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Mike Smith, Senior Planner, gave the staff report and Powerpoint presentation (copy on file). He noted the agreement was previously presented to the Commission on April 11, 2018 and has a minor text revision. The revision ensures a minimum of floor area for non-residential commercial uses are developed within a specific timeframe. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing no comment, he closed the public hearing. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Guglielmo, carried 5-0 to adopt the Resolution Recommending approval of Development Agreement DRC2018-00118 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: Commissioner Munoz reported that the proposition to revoke SB1 and the Transportation bill was approved and will be on the November ballot. He said if the measure is approved it would eliminate the dollars that our city has been receiving from the state. Cities across California would lose the dollars that have been earmarked to fix our roads — not a good thing for cities. Chairman Oaxaca noted the proposition to split California into 3 pieces will also be on the ballot. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: None Page 5 of 7 C2—Pg 5 JUNE 271 2018 000 �� HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA F. ADJOURNMENT 7:20 P.M. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 21, 2018 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. 4S Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. Page 6 of 7 C2—Pg 6 JUNE 27, 2018 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments " There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 7 of 7 C2—Pg 7 REPORT DATE: July 11, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planne(Z6) INITIATED BY: Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT: SELECTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION/PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OFFICER POSITIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Commission should consider the current Chairman and Vice Chairman positions and by minute action. The term is for 1 -year reviewed annually. BACKGROUND: The Administrative Regulations for the Planning Commission provide for the Commission to select its own officers. Each year the Commission selects a Chairman and Vice Chairman to serve a 1 -year term from amongst themselves. Commissioner Oaxaca became Chairman and Commissioner Macias became Vice Chairman in July of 2016. Per City policy, a Chairman may only serve 2 consecutive years. The policy was set forth to provide for training opportunities and succession planning for the Commission. For this reason, the Commission should select a Commissioner other than Commissioner Oaxaca to serve as Chairman at this time. There is no time limit/tenure policy regarding the Vice Chairman position; therefore, Commissioner Macias may be affirmed or a new Commissioner selected to serve as Vice Chairman. CB/LS D1—Pg 1 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Plann<40 INITIATED BY: Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT: SELECTION OF THE COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Commission should consider the current Design Review Committee membership and by minute action, either affirm the existing membership or select new members. The term is for 1 -year reviewed annually. BACKGROUND: The Design Review Committee reviews the architectural design, signage, building colors, site plans and landscape plans for proposed development projects in Rancho Cucamonga. The Design Review Committee consists of the City Planner or her designee and two Planning Commissioners. The Planning Commission selects new or affirms the existing Commission representation from amongst themselves each year. Currently, Commissioners Macias and Wimberly are serving on the Design Review Committee and Commissioner Munoz is the First Alternate. There are no current vacancies on the Committee. CB/LS D2—Pg 1 DATE: July 11, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary SUBJECT: SELECTION OF THE COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission should retain its current membership until further notice. BACKGROUND: The Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) assists the Planning Commission by reviewing proposed projects that may impact the existing trail system, its use, future improvements and addressing resident concerns. The TAC reviews and recommends priorities for trail improvement projects and forwards those recommendations to the Planning Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission for consideration which then are forwarded to the City Council as part of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The Trails Advisory Committee by resolution is comprised of two members of the Park and Recreation Commission, two members of the Planning Commission and two Members at Large representing the trails and bicycling community. In December of 2017, the City Council placed the Park and Recreation Commission "On Hold" status and temporarily disbanded that Commission. Because of the "On Hold" status of the Park and Recreation Commission, the Trails Advisory Committee is left in a "no possible majority" situation with only 4 voting members comprised of two Planning Commissioners, an equestrian representative and a representative for the biking community (the staff representative is a non-voting member). Currently, no remedy exists should a tie vote occur. Staff is considering options for a policy change that may allow tie votes to be forwarded to the full Planning Commission for a decision. Other options may be explored as well. Staff will bring a report on this issue to the Commission at a later time. Until that time, staff is recommending the current membership remain in place to maintain stability amongst the current committee membership which is: • Francisco Oaxaca - Commissioner • Ray Wimberly - Commissioner • Carol Douglass — Equestrian Representative • Tom Tisler — Biking Representative D3—Pg 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TAC MEMBERSHIP SELECTIONS JULY 11, 2018 Page 2 TERMS AND MEMBERSHIP: Typically, the Planning Commission reviews the TAC membership in July if a Commission member is nearing the end of a term or has notified the City of an impending retirement. Currently, Chairman Oaxaca just completed the 2nd year of his 2 -year term and Commissioner Fletcher retired. Commissioner Wimberly just completed his 2nd year as First Alternate and has replaced Commissioner Fletcher since his retirement in December of 2017. CB;LS D3—Pg 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT• •-y DATE: July 11, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner POP,- uC INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Continued from June 13 and June 27, 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 -ARCHIBALD OIL -A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Continued from June 13 and June 27. 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 - ARCHIBALD OIL -A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- 00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Continued from June 13 and June 27. 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 -ARCHIBALD OIL -A request to establish a 968 square foot E1-E6Pgl PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Continued from June 13 and June 27. 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL' ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 — ARCHIBALD OIL A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017- 00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Continued from June 13 and June 27, 2018. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative' Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Continued from June 13 and June 27, 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: Recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and E1—E6 Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 Adopt the attached Resolutions recommending that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684; and Adopt the attached Resolutions approving Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approval of the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment. PROJECT REVIEW BACKGROUND: The proposed applications were originally scheduled for Planning Commission consideration on June 13, 2018. During circulation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) the City received comments from the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regarding the proposed project. To allow the applicant the time to prepare and submit responses to these comments, and the opportunity for these agencies to confirm acceptance of the applicant's responses, the June 13, 2018 staff report (Exhibit A) recommended the Planning Commission continue the applications to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting, and the June 27, 2018 staff report (Exhibit B) recommended the Planning Commission continue the applications to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. The Commission accepted both of these recommendations and continued the review of these application accordingly. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for 2 parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) with a combined area of 1.22 acres located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route (Exhibit B). The applicant also proposes to re- establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacant/inactive service station that consists of a 1,728 -square foot service station building, a 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and to construct a 968 -square foot car wash on APN: 0208-291-05. There is no proposal for development of APN: 0208-291-06 associated with this project. The site is adjacent to existing vacant, school, residential, and commercial land uses to the north, south, and east, and west as indicated in the following table. E1—E6 Pg3 Land Use General Plan , Zoning Inactive service station and Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Site Vacant Residential Residential District Mulberry Early Education Low Medium Low Medium (LM) North Center Residential Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District East Existing residential Low Medium Low Medium (LM) Residential Residential District West Vacant Office Office Professional (OP) District E1—E6 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 ANALYSIS: A. Background: The project site was occupied by an older service station with minimal site improvements. On October 11, 1978, the Planning Commission approved Director Review No. 78-30 for the demolition of that service station and construction of a new service station facility. Approved improvements included the main structure, fuel canopy with two parallel gasoline islands, and three underground storage tanks. On December 26, 1980 the Design Review Committee reviewed a revised site plan and building elevations for the proposed service station and found them to be in substantial compliance with the previously approved plans; the existing service station was constructed shortly thereafter. On July 15, 1987, the City Planner approved a minor remodel of the existing service station building. Operations of this service station facility were discontinued in 2002 and the three underground fuel tanks were removed. B. Urgency Ordinance No. 932: On June 20, 2018, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 932 establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of carwashes within the City. Project applications that had paid application fees prior to the adoption of the Urgency Ordinance were exempted from the exclusions of the moratorium. The moratorium is not applicable to the proposed project as all application fees were paid prior to the moratorium's effective date. C. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684: The applicant submitted a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and a Zoning Map Amendment to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to, the General Commercial (GC) District for two parcels at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue (Exhibits D and E). In 1978, when the currently existing service station land use was approved, the project site was located in the Neighborhood Commercial (C-1) District (a carryover from County zoning). In 1981, the City's General Plan identified the parcels as being within the Medium Residential land use designation, and the 1983 Zoning Map identified the parcels as being within the Medium (M) Residential District. A 1984 General Plan Amendment revised the land use designation from Medium Residential to Low Medium. Residential. Subsequent amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map maintained the Low Medium land use designation and Low Medium (LM) Residential District for these parcels, but expanded the land use designation and land use district to properties to the north and east. The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments are compatible with the existing, though inactive, service station land use. These amendments will allow for a gradual reduction in the intensity of land uses moving northward from the project site. The existing Mulberry Early Education Center provides a buffer between the proposed service station/carwash and the existing single-family uses further to the north. Similarly, the eventual development of the easterly parcel included in this request will provide a buffer for the existing residential land uses to the east. The proposed General Commercial designation is also compatible with the Office designation to the west, the General Industrial designation to the southwest, and the General Commercial designation to the south. The E1—E6 Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 5 existing surrounding land uses in those directions are of a similar intensity to the proposed service station/carwash and are not expected to be negatively impacted by it. Additionally, the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2), with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. At the June 13, 2018, Planning Commission meeting questions were raised by the public regarding why the City is considering the proposed General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. In the early 1980's the City designated the approximate 18 acres on the north side of Arrow Route, between Archibald Avenue and Ramona Avenue to the east, as being within the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, a land use district that could permit residential development a density of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. In 2006, the Department of Education developed the Mulberry Early Education Center immediately north of the project site. The development of the school resulted in the project site being extremely unlikely as usable and/or suitable for residential development. This is due to the design and technical standards applicable to residential development in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District that would be impractical to meet including, for example, minimum requirements for lot area, lot dimensions, and building setbacks. Also, there are requirements for emergency vehicle access and limitations on driveway access to a major street that would be difficult to address. In 2017 the California Legislature approved California's 2017 Housing Package, which among other housing bills included Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). SB 166 prohibits a City from reducing, requiring, or permitting a reduction of the residential density to a lower residential density that is below the density that was used by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in determining compliance with housing element law, unless the City makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the General Plan, including the housing element, and that the remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need. The City may only reduce the residential density for a parcel if it identifies sufficient sites, so that there is no net loss of residential capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City's regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. Here, the westerly 0.67- acre service station parcel was not included in the capacity analysis as the City had sufficient vacant residentially zoned parcels to accommodate the regional housing need. The easterly 0.55 acre was identified E1—E6 Pg5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 6 in the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District; however, there are sufficient remaining parcels in the Very Low (VL), Low, (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts to accommodate the Moderate -Income and Above Moderate Income housing rneed, and this parcel was not included in analysis to demonstrate capacity for the Very Low and Low-income housing need. D. Design Review DRC2015-00682: The application proposes to utilize the existing service station building for retail food sales, reuse the existing fuel canopy, and construct a new 968 square foot carwash at the southeast corner of the service station building (Exhibits F, G, and H). The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. Asphalt paving covers most of the site, with no identified parking spaces on-site; however, site improvements include the installation of landscape planters along the entire north and east property lines, and the striping of 7 parking spaces. The existing trash enclosure will be relocated to the northeast corner of the project site. Project circulation will provide for two- way access from each driveway to the food store and fuel canopy. Due to site constraints, only one-way access will be allowed around the north side of the food store, to the carwash, and exiting to Arrow Route. The existing service station building is constructed out of tan brick and terra cotta roof tiles and the fuel canopy is constructed out of metal posts and terra cotta roof tiles. The applicant proposes a complete redesign of project architecture for the existing service station and fuel canopy buildings (Exhibit 1). Proposed architecture for the service station, carwash, and fuel canopy is for a contemporary commercial structure utilizing common materials and finishes. The exterior of the service station/carwash building proposes to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone veneer wainscoting as well as additional architectural elements including tower elements, roof tiles, exposed rafter tails, aluminum store front windows, and green screen, all to add visual interest to the building design. The exterior of the fuel canopy building proposes the installation of river rock wainscot at the base of the canopy structure. The elevations for the fuel canopy proposed metal panels and tenant signage on the roof structure; however, staff comments from the Design Review Committee (Exhibit L) identified removing the architectural treatment/signage on the fuel canopy and to retain the existing terra cotta roof tiles. The Design Review Committee supported this recommendation and recommended approval of the project. The Development Code Chapter 17.90.030 regulates Drive -In and Drive -Through Use and specifically identifies that uses with drive-through facilities shall be located 300 feet away from any intersection; however, per the Development Code"deviations to these provisions may be considered through the issuance of a site plan and Architectural [Design] Review Permit." The proposed site plan (Exhibit F) and building elevations (Exhibit 1) were submitted as part of the plans associated with the proposed project. The proposed carwash is attached to, and integrated into, the design of the existing gas station building. Itfunctions on the project site as an accessory use to the gas station. It is also screened as much as possible as seen from the intersection. Furthermore, the plotting of the carwash allows for full vehicular circulation and emergency access around the site. Due to these design E1—E6 Pg6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 7 characteristics, the Design Review Committee's recommendation of approval, and the Planning Commission's consideration of this proposal, which if approved, the 300 -foot setback is not necessary. E. Proiect Parking Analysis: The Development Code (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC) Section 17.64) establishes parking requirements for the project as follows: Land Use Parking Ratio Parking Spaces Total Parking Spaces Required Provided Service 3.0 Per 1,000 Square Feet, 5.1 5 Station Plus 2 Per Service Ba Canaash 2.5 Per Wash Bay 2.5 2 Total Parking Spaces Required 8 Total Parking Spaces Provided 7 Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00681: The Development Code (RCMC Section 17.16.120.A) identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the proposed General Commercial (GC) District, service stations are a permitted land use, and car washes are permitted, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Here, the service station building and fuel pump canopy are existing and will be adapted for reuse, subject to some architectural and site planning modifications and improvements. The carwash building will be located on the east side of the service station building, is designed for architectural compatibility, will operate as an automated facility, and is situated on the parcel to minimize the potential for any impacts to adjacent property. The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. Fact: The proposed project includes amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map to change the land use designation and zoning of the subject properties to General Commercial and General Commercial (GC) District. Within the General Commercial (GC) District, service stations are a permitted land use and carwashes are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed service station facility was designed to be compatible with all applicable development standards of the Development Code, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications. E1—E6 Pg7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 8 Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: Subject to approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, establishment of the proposed service station and carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. G. Variance DRC2016-00831: The proposed project includes an amendment to the Zoning Map to change the zoning of the subject properties to General Commercial (GC) District. Within the General Commercial (GC) District the Development Code establishes a minimum interior side parking setback (adjacent to residential) of 10 feet (RCMC Table 17.36.030-1). Further, Footnote 3 to this table identifies that the setback to parking and/or building shall be landscaped. The property to the north will remain in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District and the property to the east is proposed to be changed to the General Commercial (GC) District. The proposed site plan delineates 7 parking spaces on the project site, 4 of which are located 5.5 feet from the north property line. The findings of facts below support the necessary Variance findings; which are required by the City's Development Code: Findino: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Fact: Commercial development standards establish landscaped setbacks to separate and buffer between adjacent land uses. The proposed setback reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash and how this facility relates to adjacent properties. Specifically, the service station building is located in the center of the project site and the fuel pump canopy is located between the service station building and the Archibald Avenue street frontage. The addition of the carwash building adjacent to the service station, the addition of perimeter landscaping, and 7 additional parking spaces does makes enforcement of the development standard inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code as 4 of the proposed parking spaces had to shift northly to provide sufficient room for on-site circulation around the north side of the service station building. E1—E6 Pg8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 9 Finding: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Fact: The existing project site is developed with the service station building, fuel canopy, street adjacent landscaping, minimal interior landscaping, and property line adjacent asphalt paving. Proposed improvements to reuse the service station 'building and fuel canopy, modify existing driveway access, install delineated parking spaces, and property line adjacent landscaping will significantly improve the appearance of a non -conforming site. Although the proposed parking is located 5.5 feet away from the property line, vehicles on- site were previously able to park property line adjacent. Proposed project improvements will allow for the addition of a landscaped buffer between existing land uses to the north and proposed improvements on-site. Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact: The setback reduction allows landscaping and parking to be distributed throughout the entire project site. There are numerous properties within the General Commercial (GC) District developed under either County standards prior to incorporation, or to City standards that permitted parking either at a 5 -foot minimum setback, or immediately adjacent to the property line. The strict enforcement of the required setback would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same General Commercial (GC) District and/or require a redesign of the project, which is impractical as potential alternate solutions are limited by existing improvements on the project site. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact: The project site is located in a proposed General Commercial (GC) District, which was designed to accommodate a variety of land uses. There are numerous properties within the General Commercial (GC) District developed under either County standards prior to incorporation, or to City standards that permitted parking either at a 5 -foot minimum setback, or immediately adjacent to the property line. The approval of this Variance application will not constitute a grant of special privilege as other properties in the same General Commercial (GC) District enjoy the property right requested. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact: The requested reduction in the parking setback will not negatively impact the adjacent property owners. The closest building within the existing Mulberry Early Education Center is situated approximately 160 feet north of the shared property line with the project site, with parking and landscaping located between their facility and their south property line. Due to the existing building separation, the proposed setback reduction will not negatively impact properties or improvements in the vicinity. E1—E6 Pg9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 10 H. Minor Exception DRC2017-00879: Parking for the project site is based on a summation of parking requirements for the retail, fuel sales, and carwash land uses. Based upon these requirements a total of 8 parking spaces are required; however, due to site constraints, only 7 parking spaces are provided. A Minor Exception application was submitted to reduce the total on-site parking by 1 parking space, a proposed 12.5 percent reduction in the on-site parking requirement. A Minor Exception (RCMC, Section 17.16.110) may be granted to modify development standards provided certain findings can be made, and provides for up to a 25 percent reduction in required on-site parking. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code. Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Fact: The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the General' Plan, which has stated policies to designate appropriate land uses to support local community needs (LU -1.2) and to support development complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and reuse that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas (Policy LU -2.4). The proposed parking reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash. Finding: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Fact: The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses as the project site is within the existing Low Medium (LM) Residential District and proposed General Commercial (GC) District, which will permit the re-establishment of the service station land use. The proposed project will rehabilitate and reuse an existing service station building that has been closed since 2002 and the redesign and reuse of a project site that will contribute positively to the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Fact: The proposed parking reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash. Specifically, the service station building is located in the center of the project site and the fuel pump canopy is located between the service station building and the Archibald Avenue street frontage. The addition of the carwash building adjacent to the service station, the addition of perimeter landscaping, and the addition of 7 other parking spaces does not provide the opportunity to add any additional parking. Finding: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. E1—E6 Pg10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 - ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 11 Fact: The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required number of parking spaces where the applicant has demonstrated that the projectwill provide adequate parking for all on-site uses. Operation and use of the fuel pumps does not require someone patronizing the project site to enter the service station building as fuel can be purchased directly at the fuel pump. Operation and use of the carwash facility is automated and a carwash can be purchased directly at the carwash facility. There is sufficient parking on-site to support the patronage of the service station food store. I. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties located within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at the Rancho Cucamonga Family Resource Center on May 14, 2018. Three people attended the meeting, two of which are adjacent property owners. The applicant's representative provided an overview of the project and informed the residents of the project access from Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, existing and proposed on-site improvements, overall site design and proposed improvements, site access and a future shared driveway at Arrow Route, and the anticipated construction schedule. The most notable issue raised related to the proposed driveway at Arrow Route. The property owner of the adjacent parcel (APN: 0208-291-06) questioned the alignment of the proposed driveway, which is not shown centered on the property line between the two parcels. Conditions of approval for the project will require the applicant to provide an easement along the easterly portion of 8477 Archibald. Avenue (the project site, APN: 0208- 291-05) for the benefit of the parcel to the east (APN: 0208-291-06) for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. J. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Macias, Oaxaca, and Smith) on October 31, 2017 (Exhibit L). No major issues were identified and the Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission. K. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee on October 31, 2017. The Technical Review Committee recommended approval of the project to the Planning Commission. Their conditions of approval are included in the Design Review Resolution and attached Conditions of Approval. L. Tribal Consultation (Senate Bill 18 and Assembly Bill 52): As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests for General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation, Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, 'San Manual Band of Mission Indians, and the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians. The notices were mailed on August 25, 2015 and provided for a 90 -day comment period ending on E1 -E6 Pg11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018. Page 12 November 18, 2015. Of the 5 tribes who were notified, none submitted a response requesting consultation during the notification period. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, San Manual Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians following a completeness determination for Design Review DRC2015-00682. The notices were mailed on February 14, 2018 and provided for a 30 -day comment period ending on March 19, 2018. On February 20, 2018 the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation responded with a request for consultation, which was held on March 28, 2018. Tribal comments from that consultation are included in the proposed mitigation measures. Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the proposed mitigation measures will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. M. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental effects of the project (Exhibit N). Based on the findings contained in that IS, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. A comment letter (Exhibit P) was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. Burrtec's comment addressed AB 341 and AB 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. A comment letter (Exhibit Q) was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soil contamination or groundwater contamination on- site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have never been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial E1—E6 Pg12 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 13 Action Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001. The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. A comment letter (Exhibit R) was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions, which has been revised in the attached Design Review Resolution of Approval. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments. FISCAL IMPACT/PROPERTY TAX AND IMPACT FEES: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The overall project, during construction may increase construction -related employment and, following its completion, will increase employment due to new commercial uses, and may increase employment at surrounding existing and future businesses that will provide services to the employees and customers of the project. Also, a positive fiscal impact for the City will occur through increased sales tax revenue generated by the employees and customer patronage of local businesses. E1—E6Pg13 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831 AND ME DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 14 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and its policies related to serving local needs and promoting complementary development. The proposed General Plan Amendment will support the local and surrounding community's needs and will allow for the rehabilitation and re -use of the service station facility. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan as it supports the rehabilitation and re -use of this facility and the site plan and architectural design will minimize any impact to surrounding properties. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. No comments were received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 13, 2018 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 27, 2018 Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - General Plan Land Use Designation Exhibit E - Zoning Map Land Use District Exhibit F - Site Plan Exhibit G - Existing Improvements Site Plan Exhibit H - Proposed Improvements Site Plan Exhibit I - Floor Plan and Elevations Exhibit J - BMP Plan Exhibit K - Site Drainage Plan Exhibit L - Design Review Committee Comments and Action Agenda, October 31, 2017 Exhibit M - Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration with a location map Exhibit N - Initial Study (Parts I, II & III) Exhibit O - Mitigation Monitoring Program Exhibit P - Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc., letter dated May 18, 2018 Exhibit Q - Department of Toxic Substances Control letter dated May 23, 2018, with Applicant's response dated June 4, 2018 Exhibit R - South Coast Air Quality Management District letter dated May 29, 2018, with Applicant's response dated June 6, 2018 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 Draft Resolution Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2015-00682 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2016-00831 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 CB:TG/Is E1—E6 P.g14 STAFF REPORT DATE: June 13, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission P+ " FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner ' INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- 00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681- ARCHIBALD OIL—A request to establish a 968 square foot automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sales in an EXHIBIT A E1—E6Pg15 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, DRC2015-00682, DRC2015-00681, DRC2016-00831 AND DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL June 13, 2018 Page 2 existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 — ARCHIBALD OIL —A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017- 00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the project to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting. BACKGROUND The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Design Review and related applications were scheduled for the June 13, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. However, following circulation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project staff received comments from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and E1—E6Pg16 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, DRC2015-00682, DRC2015-00681, DRC2016-00831 AND DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL June 13, 2018 Page 3 the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) that required further analysis. The applicant's consultants have prepared responses to those comments and the City will be requesting concurrence from both agencies so that a proper staff review and evaluation can be included in the Planning Commission staff report. CB:TG/Is E1—E6 Pg17 REPORT DATE: June 27, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planne INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00683 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. EXHIBIT B ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00684 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route; APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. This application will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential .District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at.the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- 00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681-ARCHIBALD OIL -A request to establish a 968 square foot automated car wash associated with a request to establish retail sales in an E1 -E6 Pg 18 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, DRC2015-00682, DRC2015-00681, DRC2016-00831 AND DRC2017-00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL June 27, 2018 Page 2 existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building and re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND VARIANCE DRC2016-00831 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet -6 inches for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Minor Exception DRC2017- 00879. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017- 00879 — ARCHIBALD OIL — A request to reduce on-site parking by 12.5% for the proposed request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the project to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission Meeting. BACKGROUND: The proposed General Plan Amendment, Zoning Map Amendment, and Design Review and related applications were continued from the June 13, 2018 to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meetings. Following circulation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, staff received comments from the South Coast Air Quality Management District E1—E6 Pg19 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, DRC2015-00682, DRC2015-00681, DRC2016-00831 AND DRC2017-00879 — ARCH I BALD OIL June 27, 2018 Page 3 (SCAQMD) and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) that required further analysis. The applicant's consultants prepared responses to those comments, which were submitted to both the DTSC and the SCAQMD. The DTSC indicated that they have no further comments; however, the SCAQMD is still reviewing the information provided. The City is requesting concurrence from both agencies so that a proper staff review and evaluation can be included in the Planning Commission staff report. CB:TG/jy E1—E6 Pg20 EXHIBIT C El—HP-921 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 — Archibald Oil Existing: Low Medium Residential Proposed; General Commercial EXHIBIT D E1—E6 Pg22 n Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 — Archibald Oil Existing: low Medium Proposed: General r EXHIBIT E E1 -E6 Pg23 nM•w HSa idv) 0O007 Oln S1ND13A0,dCA( T 30VdOd0 CD 3 S YW :b 38 3 a 9 5 i CD = p In e m a ^•- Way N A _ 3 3 3 CD _ In :— _ ONtl11Ntl)tlA _ '000L1 M. 32'-0' MOOIT IEI APPROACH I PIPE IPYLX iib' O�b91H��d E1-E6Pg24 1 ` =_ _ _ffl —.C -.9Z a _ _ CD zi - E1-E6Pg24 1 —.C -.9Z ft! CD zi - —.0.si o tg (21 V H 131 Q • i z Zf sl E1-E6Pg24 1 —.C -.9Z ft! CD zi - •I cl I o tg (21 V H 131 Q • i z 1 Q z •� I J a � �p p d �I. •.•'��P' _� ��•� .i��tih W W In o ^ 1 O C) c \ J < i E1-E6Pg24 "*-* iPr"vx ix 11 HSVMdVl NO 00V ONtl S1N3W340ddWl3 I I 30VdOdn En J Q C i 3 U7 a O lJ _ j 000 w aaAe J _ N w w aj = �a V N u int � u Q Quo aNA rc V I 0 I I I 1 I I I m I I ryl I I nT ,I I - 1 w y I I - I O p I I v w z e ,Wm W! 30'-0' IEI APPROACH . Z.LL ... T. r t W = 30' 0". 3 IElAPPROACH -3nN3AV OId91HMV—�-- 11VM 313d3NO3 c H91N .9 131 �Y_ aaou O 131 3 O Of Cf Q z a a 13)vds W I— NINUV 131 l' o z it w (n J F 1 1 1W {IF -.FS I -yam _ ¢� =w =� 7,2. 06u. A I 0 I I I 1 I I I m I I ryl I I nT ,I I - 1 w y I I - I O p I I v w z e ,Wm W! 30'-0' IEI APPROACH . Z.LL ... T. r t W = 30' 0". 3 IElAPPROACH -3nN3AV OId91HMV—�-- 1 3 K W � �z O 131 3 O Of Cf Q z a a W I— 1 l' o z it (n J X a W N 1 1 " HStlMtltl7 IN1 OOtl ONV S1N3tJ3AOtldH113130tld9d0 ONVI 1NVIVA ❑ "' �'6 �YV •^ .a -.L T _..i ••. \ m� —.0-.21—.f ^'_fir_ — � I nv .� > I _------_— IJ n = ?• •• a '.'.' •'.'1 I 133di5 i0 iIYH 1N1 1 .•.'Ok. I I � \ r P \ •'0 y6 E:f�— Ll I ^� SIJ 133r1Sia JIVH 131 i Lli C y l l 1 o �I 5 t0 CD Y l t LL Bt L <� s .yam6�L-.5 \ o _ b it I 5-------O NOI1V31030 p / W ht/dINI w z a '.'.' I , I r ______ _______ •. •.•.•. •.•.1 rn/tl 131 p u u — W a� z I � w •:•}rril --_--_-_--- - _' m 4''' J a 0 _J w m. _ ..1 •' .� ..\ • .I.' 00 W a .':'IID.Uy7jOj0; .�."};•in,.9999t �'•'••,. .il. tib In w o I 27 .07 .p... .. .... MODIFY tEl APPROACH a J a s r p x a na a=a \n EXHIBIT HE) MV9lHDdV—i------ -1 _ i} A 5. m� &. ONVI 1NVIVA ❑ "' �'6 �YV •^ .a -.L T _..i ••. \ m� —.0-.21—.f ^'_fir_ — � I nv .� > I _------_— IJ n = ?• •• a '.'.' •'.'1 I 133di5 i0 iIYH 1N1 1 .•.'Ok. I I � \ r P \ •'0 y6 E:f�— Ll I ^� SIJ 133r1Sia JIVH 131 i Lli C y l l 1 o �I 5 t0 CD Y l t LL Bt L <� s .yam6�L-.5 \ o _ b it I 5-------O NOI1V31030 p / W ht/dINI w z a '.'.' I , I r ______ _______ •. •.•.•. •.•.1 rn/tl 131 p u u — W a� z I � w •:•}rril --_--_-_--- - _' m 4''' J a 0 _J w m. _ ..1 •' .� ..\ • .I.' 00 W a .':'IID.Uy7jOj0; .�."};•in,.9999t �'•'••,. .il. tib In w o I 27 .07 .p... .. .... MODIFY tEl APPROACH a J a s r p x a na a=a \n EXHIBIT HE) MV9lHDdV—i------ -1 _ IE of lfv .vv30\j' \ u�LLu HSV Mtltl) (NJ WtlGNtl S1N3W 3A 0tld WI (3) 30tl89d0 w EXHIBIT E E1 -E6 Pg27 O O O 1L _�.:. : 1;;y.: : If'�__O° O _ -f+1 5_x.� ::. L.'!"u yF�jfll `�i �fi i•i o M1 III 11 n*ljm �. •= gag m O "t,a; '—'1ii`�'-�r�""��:ir"lr ' � � 771 jai`..z� O° .=0..�.L� 7 4 �- __ _ t0 :17I 11711 :�� zea `� .. I i7171•r4-,. 13 STONE VENEER ALUM STOREFRONT 0 0 '• pCLEAR ANODIZED CLEAR/ SUNFILTER _ o TRADE111PER FRANCHISE ,. , ARCHITEITUP I — __ ARE HCFL)URAL TRE Ai MINI FRF ATMEN I •' Chevron i i —then LHEVRON— I RADE IIRESS �I ,olrcrorn IIF L iP? m SOUTH ELFVAIION (NORTH SIMILAR) �,�, WESI ELEVATION (EAST SIMILAR) 3 ARCHDECIURAI. IREACMENI m Ruur --., — 16 TOP DF STPUCTUP•E ' ^' nnrroN --- CLEARAPC } v TRADE „ � - DRESS N e CANOPY ELEVATIONS FINISH F!.OU� \�' A N 0 SECTION ; ; ,, :ANOPY" SEFTICN [/- LLGLND LEGEND MARK MARK MATERIALS _ MARK MATERIALS MARK LOLORL MARK �j STUCCO 9 GUTTER A WHIT; I I TERRA COTTA 2O METAL FLASIHING1� DOWNSPOUT LIGHT BEIGF J YELLOW AL ALUM SCREEN <ij>AWNING a MEDIUM BEIGF O RIVER ROIK yV OMIT Dldli _ ��5 GLAZING 1 GREEN SCRFFN E ELFAR GLASS '16/ ALUMINUM STOREFRONTiQ DMI) CLEAR ANODI''ED ' OI SIGN P CONTROL JOINT CGS, PAINT TO MATCH; N WALL WASHER LIGHT tE TILF ROOF H1 -CR, FRANCHISF TRADF DRESS ""' A-: EXHIBIT J E®m@g ! Om \ \ % y!; )W§� \� E®m@g Om \ \ % E®m@g Om \� { p Ril . fE ib\ / 9 e Ills ON mneg pta y $8eeeaEzreet� 5 j ? �Oi e� "9 3 � Z e. O rj o b d W Q Z Z U Z J J Q aQcD w z C, o Z Q Q Q m U ( U U O < Q O w = U a ro � WIN EXHIBIT K E1 -E6 Pg31 08009 00009 �000lu �a E 8� IL C` 6 O $ 5H gy o° F p w ¢ rn J eg 3 �op�p,,� �yZ�JJ.0 E. o `9v�m5-...Z> g CEJ gaim ma JQZ zF aW p0 ow q s eq J m � K Si U p3nB m' m i 3339 §a k< Z U d' QW O 0Ul EW ^U ap 00 ��2 d <a0 v�roZ E1 -E6 Pg31 08009 00009 �000lu �a E 8� IL OCTOBER 31, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA I TTIT� Z0 CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly 7.00 P.M. Rich Macias X Candyce Burnett Donald Granger Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present: Mike Smith, Senior Planner and Toni Grahn, Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 EXHIBIT L E1—E6 Pg32 OCTOBER 31, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low -Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. The Committee approved the project as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. D. ADJOURNMENT 7:15 P.M. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist II with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, October 24, 2017, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. E1—E6 Pg33 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tom Grahn October 31, 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00682 - ARCHIBALD OIL - A request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low -Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0208-291-05. Related files: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, and Variance DRC2016-00831. General: The project site is a square shaped parcel of 29,456 square feet (0.676 acre) with dimensions of about 174 feet (east to west) and 180 feet (north to south) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is fully improved with a 1,728 square foot service station building and 1,481 square foot fuel canopy. Landscape areas are provided along both street frontages, and additional landscaped areas are located at the northwest and southeast corners of the site. Vehicle access is provided by two existing driveways along Archibald Avenue (at the northwest and southwest corners) and one existing driveway along Arrow Route (at the southeast corner). The property to the north of the site contains the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low -Medium (LM) Residential District. Immediately to the south is Arrow Route and beyond that is a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District. The property to the east is vacant, and beyond that are properties developed with residential uses. These properties to the east are in the Low -Medium (LM) Residential District. To the west is Archibald Avenue, and beyond that is vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP). District. The application proposes to utilize the existing service station building for retail food sales, reuse the existing fuel canopy, and construct a new 968 square foot carwash at the southeast corner of the service station building. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. Asphalt paving covers most of the site, with no identified parking spaces on-site; however, site improvements include the installation of landscape planters along the entire north and east property lines, and the striping of 7 parking spaces. Parking for the project site is based on a summation of parking requirements for the retail, fuel sales, and car wash land uses. Based upon these requirements a total of 8 parking spaces are required. Due to site constraints, only 7 parking spaces are provided. The applicant will be submitting a Minor Exception application to address this discrepancy. The existing trash enclosure will be relocated to the northeast corner of the project site. Project circulation will provide for two-way access from each driveway to the food store and fuel canopy. Due to site constraints, only one-way access will be allowed around the north side of the food store, to the carwash, and exiting to Arrow Route. The existing service station building is constructed out of tan brick and terra cotta roof tiles and the fuel canopy is constructed out of metal posts and terra cotta roof tiles. The applicant proposes a complete redesign of project architecture for the existing service station and fuel canopy buildings. Proposed architecture for the service station, carwash, and fuel canopy is for a contemporary commercial structure utilizing common materials and finishes. The exterior of the service station/carwash building proposes to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone E1—E6 Pg34 DRC COMMENTS DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL October 31, 2017 Page 2 veneer wainscoting as well as additional architectural elements including tower elements, roof tiles, exposed rafter tails, aluminum store front windows, and green screen, all to add visual interest to the building design. The exterior of the fuel canopy building proposes the installation of river rock wainscot at the base of the structure and the installation of panels at the terra cotta roof for tenant signage. Related Applications: Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 was submitted to re-establish the service station land use and establish the car wash land use. Variance DRC2016-00831 was submitted to reduce the parking setback along the streets. In order to allow for a reduction in the number of on-site parking spaces associated with the reuse of a vacant service station, the applicant will need to submit a Minor Exception application. The General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 were submitted to change the General Plan designation and Zoning District for the project site, and the adjacent parcel to the east, from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial, and Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Staff supports the proposed site layout and overall design of the proposed project. The building itself consists of visually -interesting fagades which meet the City's 360 -degree design standards. The building fagade incorporates a variety of materials, including stucco finish, stone veneer wainscott, stone, glass store front windows, and aluminum awnings, and incorporates all of the City's design standards for commercial development. 2. Remove the architectural treatment/signage on the fuel canopy and retain the existing terra cotta roof tiles. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. There are no secondary design issues. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC),required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of - sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All DDC and FDC shall be screened behind a 4 -foot high block wall and appropriate landscaping. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. All ground -mounted equipment, including utility boxes, transformers, and back-flow devices, shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on -center. All ground -mounted equipment shall be painted dark green except as directed otherwise by the Fire Department. E1—E6Pg35 DRC COMMENTS DRC2015-00682 - ARCHIBALD OIL October 31, 2017 Page 2 3. The number of signs shown on the conceptual elevations exceeds what is permitted by Development Code Table 17.74.080-1, and will be subject to approval of a Sign Permit. 4. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. Staff Recommendation: Design Review Committee Action: The Committee approved the project as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. Staff Planner: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Members Present: Commissioner, Ray Wimberly; Commissioner, Francisco Oaxaca; Mike Smith, Senior Planner (substituting for Senior Planner, Donald Granger) Additional Staff Present: E1 -E6 Pg36 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated forpublic review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. Public Review Period Closes: June 13, 2018 Project Name: Archibald Oil Project Applicant: Benny Natanzi Archibald Oil 18500 Ventura Boulevard Tarzana, CA 91356 Project Location (also see attached map): Located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route—APN's: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06. Project Description: The project involves a proposal to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for 2 parcels with a combined area of 1.22 acres located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The applicant also proposes to re-establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacant/inactive service station that consists of a 1,728 -square foot service station building, a 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and to construct a 968 - square foot car wash on APN: 0208-29-05. There is no proposal for development ofAPN: 0208-291- -06 associated with this project. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study indicates that with mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. June 13, 2018 Date of Determination Adopted By EXHIBIT M E1—E6 Pg37 7 f .t 1 • ' ...♦ � i �! � c ids 1 �� � :��y�;y�\C � • ,f1yf 4 `f �; tom• ,nf'' t %Ulm JK -- - �.aow. 7A►.�"�.j. l�sr. .aYK+s"w'aton*- ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM PROMA (Part I - initial Study) ingDeparo(Please type or P/amm�Q Oeperpriam print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move Iran one line to the next line.) 19091 477-2150 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed . project sa that the City may review the project pursuant to Clty.Pollcles, Ordinance's, and Guidelines; the California Environmental.: Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQX it is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full: Upon review of.the completed initial Study, Part -I and the development application, addltlonal iiiforinatlon such as, but not Iimit6d to, tuff ',noise, bioEogical, diainage, and _ geological ceporte may be required. The projectapplication will not lie deamad`cornplete. unless ti a identified` special studies/reports:are subfn tied for review and accepted as complete and i6 uaie. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' - review unless all. required. reports. are submitted and deerried complete #off staff to preparelhe 1pitiaf Study Part If as rel 61red by Ctdk. In`addition to the filiniff66, the appllcant'will be responsible to payor ielrn6urss the City; its agents; officers,.and/or consuitanfs' foe "all' osts for: the„ prreparation; areview; analysis; recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies orieports: r: INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONSMLLNOTBEPROCESSED. Please note thetillsthe responsibility ofthe applkanitoensure that the application Is complete at the time of submittal; City staff wit not be available: to perform work required to provide missing Information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project riffe.- r0 12M : CAR ■ Name & Address of project owner(s): . is _ • ►R PtaRA• a & a :- r AVE K&.a i Name& Address of developer orproject sponsor ',moi i • �� � I r I r4-77 6-F—COL681.0 AVE .V • u / Updated 9202012 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT N E1 -E6 Pg39 Contact Person 8 Address: PA V i D 14 S py A. -r- 339 /J-O&Kffi)ReiT !>2._ -j=z03 gEvrR-LY 1+ILL-S , 66 Name 8 Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): Telephone Number. 3 to — 3,G'3 _Q 6 2 Information indicated by an asterisk () is not required of non-consiruction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. 'I) Provide a full scale (8.112 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheel(s) which Includes the project site, and indicate the site' boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views Into the site from the north, south, east, and wash views Into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views or significant features rrom the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): 4) Assessor's Parcel. Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): S Ii � i1 /•I� '5) Gross Site. Area (adsq. ff.): '30,620 Q620 C "6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets ti proposed dedications): 3 q OOO S(2- F -r 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (altach additional sheet if necessary): S EEL X 1-41 B iT 'Tp" Updated 9120=12 E1 -E6 Pg40 Page 2 of 10 Lb6d 93—L3 U A E shed Emma Palepdn sl�wlsys!Ignd•'srlooq) uogeuuolullo sewnos ye eyo •errs e o s oedse agua s! jo ua ern no uMouue 14eqy pue 47J ! 1 1 4 /P ! 1I K y! 41�se0 (ot 1�I r, n :(selpnls o/yeq 'sfauns leo/6olosqNepue oygiq'se/pnrso16o!ap�fy�o�pue!eo!6o!oe6'•e•!)ugyemjoju!josawnosJIG elro'uoy!ppau! •pegp=ep se.,nleel lueoy!u4tslo sydei6oloyd yoeny •seinlongs ayllo esn aql pue (uo!l!puoo pue e6e 6u!pnlouJ ells uo saxrlongs 6uyslxe .rue egposep •sloadse orueos pue 'sesmoo e6euleip 'spew pue speq 'seeq ejnjew 'slewlus pue shield ''G!llgels pos'Fydei6odol uo uogewjoju!6urpnlourlaafoideyleuojeq sls!xel!se ells eyl/o 6u4les!eop fgdey) eglnsap (6 'Joe!wd eql luawaldwl,rIlry of j" ul seloue6e /eluewweno6le y7opue e6uoweonp oyouvyjolp!j eql woy,4esseoeu aq pur yoryM syuued pelo uogdposep a opnlou! (g 11) Describe anynolso sources andtheirlevels, that now affect the site (8kcraft, roadway noise, air-) andhow they will affect proposed uses: I ► r _ iEV031WORFUR LAI EWA "0 1 ► 12) Describe the proposed project In detail. This should provide an adequate description ofthe site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each Increment. Attach additional sheets) if necessary. �sa��� �a7�t•7fa7=�T♦1��Ji� WIN= MWORNPUSERM" �d 'AT 91 SOUP • \ • O 6 M A• i. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, Including Inforrrration on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type orland use (residential, commerclal etc.), Intensityofland use (one4emi6t, epsrhnenthouses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc,): ;`ELE n 814 WLT c 2N (Z PROPERTY 1 ii✓ rsfi>v S0(/ . h/T r��nl�r✓2TY' Tht� tWoppi,,✓G N_t��2 WI �l-F rN F �srNb S(A-pl Nle (TaErs ( 5-f &L -ode,, 1'H V ,r_l TJ 50�1M W�S� �' N��- Tlfii9ic IS hef�i SfhR.Y �!� S�Ir 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? updated 912MO12 a / Page L, t lb C��) E1—E6 Pg42 15) indicate the type ofshort-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. Howwillthese noise levels affect ad)acent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? '16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: SES �XFFPB IT Cv 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains; S EG 1�-,XR1131 r `fGtf 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (go9) 9a7-2591. a. Residentlal (gai/day) _ Peak use (gal(Day) b. Commerclel/Ind. (gal/day/ac) %Z3.ic Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. 11 Septic Tank Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, allach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system Is proposed Indicate expected daily sewage generation:(See AftachmentAforusageestimates). Forfurtherclarificallon,please contact the Cucamonga Valley WaterDlstrict at (909) 987-2591. a. P,asidantial (galfday) ---�� b. CommerciaUlndustrial (gallday/ac) NIA RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Updated 9120P012 E1 -E6 Pg43 Page 5 o 10 Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): NZA 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/orrents: Sale Price(s) 5 to g Rent(permonth) $ to S NI 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type., /y 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: Tom` 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project., Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe typo of usa(s) and majorfuncdon(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: 1110WMAVLMVAVAA1b'Mk1MfX Updated 9120/2012 E1 -E6 Pg44 Page 6 of 10 27) Indicate hours of operation: 28) Number of employees: Total; Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipatedlob classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as wel(as an Indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): C/ _. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City' '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of airpollutio`nemissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-5283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the wafer, sewer, fire, and good control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project; It so, please indicate their response. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge ofhazardous and/or toxic materials; Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage ofany of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known, updated gr20r2012 E1 -E6 Pg45 Page 7 of 10 34) Will the proposedprojecfinvolve the temporary or long-term use,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans, 6 AV DE�;EL 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning CommissionlPlanning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation ofthisproject to the best ofmyability, that the facts, statements, and/nformation presentedare true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may berequired to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Dale: Signature: Title:%i%f/�%%�� Updated gr2012012 Page 8 of 10 E1 -E6 Pg46 ATTACHMENT"A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single -Family Multi -Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single -Family Multi -Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/daylunit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gaVday/unit (tenant) 1750 gaVday/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/apre 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 912MO12 E1—E6 Pg47 Page 9 of 10 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 Updated 91202012 E1 -E6 Pg48 Page 10 of 10 BACKGROUND City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II Project File: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. 2. Related Files: None. 3. Description of Project: The applicant, Archibald Oil, proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for 2 parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) with a combined area of 1.22 acres located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The applicant also proposes to re-establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacantlinactive service station that consists of a 1,728 -square foot service station building, a 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and to construct a 968 -square foot car wash on APN: 0208-291-05. There is no proposal for development of APN: 0208-291-06 associated with this project. 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: Benny Natanzi Archibald Oil 18500 Ventura Boulevard Tarzana, CA 91356 5. General Plan Designation: Low Medium Residential (proposed change to General Commercial). 6. Zoning: Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed changed to General Commercial (GC) District). 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project site consists of two parcels (APNs: 0208-291- 05 and 0208-291-06). APN: 0208-291-05 is a square shaped parcel of 29,456 square feet (0.70 acre) with dimensions of about 174 feet (east to west) and 180 feet (north to south) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. This parcel is fully improved with a 1,728 - square foot service station building and 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy. Landscape areas are provided along both street frontages, and additional landscaped areas are located at the northwest and southeast corners of the site. Vehicle access is provided by two existing driveways along Archibald Avenue (at the northwest and southwest corners) and one existing driveway along Arrow Route (at the southeast corner). The adjacent 0.52 -acre parcel (APN: 0208-291-05) to the east of the service station parcel is vacant. This parcel has dimensions of about 137 feet (east to west and 180 feet (north to south). The property to the north of the site contains the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. Immediately to the south is Arrow Route and beyond that is a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District. The property to the east is developed with residential uses and located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To the west is Archibald Avenue, and beyond that is vacant land in the Office Professional (OP) District. E1—E6 Pg49 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 2 Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department (909) 774-4312 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None. GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD — California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR — Environmental Impact Report FEIR — Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR — Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx— Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PMio — Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB — Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact," 'Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than -Significant -Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics ( ) Agricultural Resources (✓) Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( ) Hazards & Waste Materials (✓) Hydrology & Water Quality ( ) Land Use & Planning ( ) Mineral Resources (✓) Noise ( ) Population & Housing ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Transportation/Traffic (✓) Tribal Cultural Resources ( ) Utilities & Service Systems (✓) Mandatory Findings of DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg50 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 3 ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR ATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are innpos n the o sed project, nothing further is required., Prepared By: Date: `t `��yln10� Reviewed By: Date: L t� Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg51 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Less Than a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? O Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Sgmeganl With Mitigation Than Significant No not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic Im act incorporated Impact Im act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? O O O (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which () () (✓) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) As identified in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), the City sits at the southern base of the San Gabriel Mountains, at the eastern end of its range. The San Bernardino Mountains are just east of the San Gabriel Mountains, divided by the Cajon Pass. Views of the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains are visible from the project site. According to Figure LU -6 of the General Plan, Archibald Avenue is designated as a view corridor as it as it traverses across the City from North to South. The proposed development project on APN: 0208-291-05 is directly adjacent to Archibald Avenue, a Major Arterial (Figure CM -2) and Special Boulevard (Figure LU -6): The General Plan identifies that a Special Boulevard is characterized by landscaping, hardscaping, and meandering sidewalks. Project improvements would include maintaining existing landscaping (providing additional as necessary) and maintaining the existing curb adjacent sidewalk Archibald Avenue, these improvements support the Special Boulevard designation. Mature heritage trees existing on-site are discussed in the Section 4e under Biological Resources below. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a scenic vista caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E1—E6 Pg52 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 5 applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to scenic resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site (APN: 0208-291-05) is a square shaped parcel of 29,456 square feet (0.70 acre) with dimensions of about 174 feet (east to west) and 180 feet (north to south) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is fully improved with a 1,728 -square foot service station building and 1,481 square foot fuel canopy. Landscape areas are provided along both street frontages, and additional landscaped areas are located at the northwest and southeast corners of the site. Vehicle access is provided by two existing driveways along Archibald Avenue (at the northwest and southwest corners) and one existing driveway along Arrow Route (at the southeast corner). Overall, the project site is located within an in -fill commercial and residential area and staff has determined the proposed site improvements will be compatible with surrounding environment. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and agrees with staff that the proposed building will not degrade the visual character of the surrounding environment. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overheadutility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the visual character or quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project site is located in an area that is subject to nighttime lighting from surrounding commercial and residential uses and street lighting along Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Additionally, development of the project site would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures require compliance with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. On-site illumination levels (provided for street lighting, parking, circulation, and pedestrian areas) will comply with Development Code standards and will be shielded from adjacent properties. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to substantial light and glare caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg53 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially slgniroant With Mitigation Than significant No Im act incorporated Iraad Impad applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to scenic resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site (APN: 0208-291-05) is a square shaped parcel of 29,456 square feet (0.70 acre) with dimensions of about 174 feet (east to west) and 180 feet (north to south) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The site is fully improved with a 1,728 -square foot service station building and 1,481 square foot fuel canopy. Landscape areas are provided along both street frontages, and additional landscaped areas are located at the northwest and southeast corners of the site. Vehicle access is provided by two existing driveways along Archibald Avenue (at the northwest and southwest corners) and one existing driveway along Arrow Route (at the southeast corner). Overall, the project site is located within an in -fill commercial and residential area and staff has determined the proposed site improvements will be compatible with surrounding environment. The Design Review Committee has reviewed the project and agrees with staff that the proposed building will not degrade the visual character of the surrounding environment. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overheadutility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the visual character or quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project site is located in an area that is subject to nighttime lighting from surrounding commercial and residential uses and street lighting along Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Additionally, development of the project site would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures require compliance with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. On-site illumination levels (provided for street lighting, parking, circulation, and pedestrian areas) will comply with Development Code standards and will be shielded from adjacent properties. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to substantial light and glare caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg53 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 6 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than SignificantNo shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Impact Incorporated Impact Im act 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () () (✓) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (✓) Williamson Act contract? C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re -zoning of, () () () (✓) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 '(g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (asdefined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest () () () (✓) land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Comments: a) The project site and adjacent vacant parcel is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The proposed project site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route on a fully developed site that was previously used as a service station. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg54 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 7 farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project site contains and existing service station building and pump canopy and is not being utilized as Farmland or zone for agricultural uses. The proposed project would not result in the conversion of land from Farmland to a non-agricultural land use. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land and therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project Less Than a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWth significant fo,AZOn Than significant No b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute Impact Incor orated Impact Im act farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project site is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project site contains and existing service station building and pump canopy and is not being utilized as Farmland or zone for agricultural uses. The proposed project would not result in the conversion of land from Farmland to a non-agricultural land use. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land and therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (✓) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () (✓) () ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (✓) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (✓) number of people? Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg55 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 8 Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels i(APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.e) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMio and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. Rev 4-17 The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.e) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. E1—E6 Pg56 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting. Information Sources: Potentially Significant WithThan Mitigation Significant No n-1 Incur orated Im act Im act Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore, the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels i(APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMto), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.e) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMio and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. Rev 4-17 The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.e) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. E1—E6 Pg56 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 9 Rev 4-17 Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PMio and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) was prepared that utilizes CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short- term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to Short Term Construction Impacts caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg57 Less Than Sisot Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant Wlh Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incor orated Im act hn act Rev 4-17 Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PMio and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) was prepared that utilizes CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short- term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to Short Term Construction Impacts caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg57 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 10 Rev 4-17 Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions and Regional Thresholds) Gas Station Maximum I'll Con5lnrrtinn Fmissianc nhs7r1.qv1 Sdrucs I ROO ' 11 Less Than CO - ` ' 96i: ' . PMIti ' I . Pida's' Significant Less 0.83 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With i ligation Than Significant No 1.47 Impact Incorporated Im act Im act Rev 4-17 Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions and Regional Thresholds) Gas Station Maximum I'll Con5lnrrtinn Fmissianc nhs7r1.qv1 Sdrucs I ROO ' 11 NOx I CO - ` ' 96i: ' . PMIti ' I . Pida's' SM M, 1.19 0.83 Site Prearadon 7.34 13.64 1.36 201.11 1.47 1 14.20 1 9.70 1 0.01 1 1.67 1.21 4Yrnler 13.71 0.94 0.86 l On Site 7.29 10.63 2016 1.47 1 14.21 9.70 1 0.01 1.67 1.21 Threshold 75 100 556 150 150 55 Substantial? I No No No No No No Suilw: AnG 2Ms. Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NOx, SOx, PMto and PM2,5 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, building construction, painting (architectural coatings), paving (curb, gutter, and flatwork), and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary in Pounds Per Day (Estimated Maximum Dailv Construction Emissions and LSTs) Gas Station Localized Significance Tbreshold Mal sis (Ill I ' Phzl ; c0 ;; S _Kox " pl, a `- .. PfAzs Cemoliran 8.70 1124 1.19 0.83 Site Prearadon 7.34 13.64 1.36 0.82 Grading 8.70 1124 1.56 1.18 Build` Construction (20161 8.21 13.71 0.94 0.86 l On Site 7.29 10.63 0.66 0.61 Atchtt4c l Coating 1.88 2.37 0.20 0.20 Threshold 11.070 173 12 4 Potentially Substantial? No No No No s�cv:Ix;,-.gals. The Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) identifies that state requirements specifically address air toxics issues through Assembly Bill (AB) 1807 that established the State air toxics program and the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act (AB 2588). The air quality regulations developed from these bills have been modified recently to incorporate the Federal regulations associated with the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990. The Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act (Hot Spots Act) was enacted in September 1987. Under this bill, stationary sources of emissions are required to report the types and quantities of certain substances that their facilities routinely release into the air. The SCAQMD is required to prepare an annual report on the status and forecast of air toxic hotspots pursuant to Section 44363 of the California Health and Safety Code. SCAQMD monitors facilities that are not exempt from the fee and reporting requirements of AB 2588. Some facilities are covered under umbrella permits that address industry -wide categories. SCAQMD has issued general permits for the following seven activities including: retail gasoline dispensing, perch loroethylene dry cleaning, auto body shops,. fiberglass molding, printing, metal plating, and wood stripping and finishing. Emissions inventories and risk assessment guidelines have been prepared for the seven industry -wide categories. Approximately 1,400 auto body shops, 3,200 gasoline stations, and 1,400 E1 -E6 Pg58 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 11 Rev 4-17 perch loroethylene dry cleaners within the District are covered under these umbrella permits. Depending on the severity of the facilities' toxic air contaminant (TAC) releases, SCAQMD requires either public notification of toxic hot spots or preparation of a risk reduction plan. The proposed general gasoline dispensing facility use does not include use of stationary emergency or prime compression ignition internal combustion engines, portable diesel engines, or other equipment subject to AB 2588, and therefore, a separate Health Risk Assessment was not prepared. Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any Local Significance Threshold. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 1.47 Ibs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. E1—E6 Pg59 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Wth Mitigagon Than Significant No Impact incorporates Im act impact Rev 4-17 perch loroethylene dry cleaners within the District are covered under these umbrella permits. Depending on the severity of the facilities' toxic air contaminant (TAC) releases, SCAQMD requires either public notification of toxic hot spots or preparation of a risk reduction plan. The proposed general gasoline dispensing facility use does not include use of stationary emergency or prime compression ignition internal combustion engines, portable diesel engines, or other equipment subject to AB 2588, and therefore, a separate Health Risk Assessment was not prepared. Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any Local Significance Threshold. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 1.47 Ibs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. E1—E6 Pg59 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00641, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 12 Rev 4-17 Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (>_ 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PMio) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from E1—E6 Pg60 Less Than Signirwnl LE Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pctenlially slgnlrcant with A tigat on Than No Impact Incorporated Im act Im ad Rev 4-17 Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (>_ 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PMio) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from E1—E6 Pg60 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 13 Rev 4-17 the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) no short- term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All -paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. E1—E6 Pg61 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWN Significant t,h ga,. Than Significant No Impact Inco orated Im act Im act Rev 4-17 the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) no short- term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All -paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. E1—E6 Pg61 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 14 Rev 4-17 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried overto adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM1g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMIo emissions. Proiect Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Gas Station MaXlmlml Onerational na lu Fmisginnc lftx'cUvl . seasai:'; ,"lFi, I:^fROGt%."' Less Than t. T".-.SOz -^ PMm Significant Less 7.50 Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWlh significant Mitigation Than Inifioenl No 7.41 Impact In<or orated m act Woe 't Im act Rev 4-17 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried overto adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM1g emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMIo emissions. Proiect Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Gas Station MaXlmlml Onerational na lu Fmisginnc lftx'cUvl . seasai:'; ,"lFi, I:^fROGt%."' 'ANO: t. T".-.SOz -^ PMm Summer 7.05 7.50 36.6p 0.05 3.27 0.93 wlnler 7.41 7.76 41.45 1 0.05 327 0.93 Threshold 1 55 55 550 150 150 55 Substantial? No No No No No No snirte: tiuc: rots. E1—E6 Pg62 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 15 Rev 4-17 Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Plan Find( Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less -than -significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) no short- term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 19) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 20) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. E1—E6 Pg63 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act Rev 4-17 Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Plan Find( Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less -than -significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) no short- term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 19) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 20) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. E1—E6 Pg63 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 16 C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. As noted in subsection b above, the project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle- Ireland, August 2016) no short-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a school directly north of the project site and residences that are to the north, south, east, and west of the site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super -Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Refer to discussion under 3.b) above regarding SCAQMD reporting requirements for AB 2588 for toxic air contaminant releases. Rev 4-17 During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. E1—E6 Pg64 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Signiecant WithThan Mitigation Significant I No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. As noted in subsection b above, the project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle- Ireland, August 2016) no short-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 1/4 mile of a school directly north of the project site and residences that are to the north, south, east, and west of the site. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super -Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Refer to discussion under 3.b) above regarding SCAQMD reporting requirements for AB 2588 for toxic air contaminant releases. Rev 4-17 During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. E1—E6 Pg64 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. According to the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle- Ireland, August 2016), the proposed gas station and hypothetical commercial office/retail uses do not produce odors that could affect a substantial number of people. Fuel is stored in sealed, underground storage tanks and pumps are equipped with emissions equipment designed to minimize evaporative loss. Considering the proposed gas station fuels are stored in a manner in which fumes are contained, odors from the project are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Project generated refuse would be, stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () Significant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWlh Significant Nl gallon Than Significant Na as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in Impact Inca orateC Im act Im ad General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. According to the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle- Ireland, August 2016), the proposed gas station and hypothetical commercial office/retail uses do not produce odors that could affect a substantial number of people. Fuel is stored in sealed, underground storage tanks and pumps are equipped with emissions equipment designed to minimize evaporative loss. Considering the proposed gas station fuels are stored in a manner in which fumes are contained, odors from the project are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Project generated refuse would be, stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air quality caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat or () () () (✓) other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? : arla�i E1—E6 Pg65 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 18 d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () Less Than () (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than significant No corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery Impact Incorporated Im act Impact d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting () () () (✓) biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is currently fully developed with the existing building, landscaping, vehicle parking (truck and car), and all frontage improvements. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not located within an area with a soil type that accommodates the Delhi Sands flower -loving fly. Because the site is fully developed with an existing building, parking, and landscaping improvements, no other sensitive biological resources or endangered species of plants or animals were found on the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 Additionally, habitat suitable for migratory bird nesting is present within the survey area. Mitigation measures are recommended, including avoidance of vegetation clearing or grubbing during the nesting season to prevent impacts to raptors and migratory birds. If clearing and grubbing cannot be avoided during the nesting season mitigation measures require that a nesting bird survey be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to vegetation clearing or ground disturbing activities. If active nests are located during preconstruction surveys, a qualified biologist will develop and implement a plan to avoid nests and minimize and prevent impacts to nesting birds. 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. E1—E6 Pg66 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 19 If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings.havefledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to biological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are 9 California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa) trees on site all planted with the development of the existing service station building; none of these 9 trees meat Development Code criteria to be considered a Heritage Tree. The Development Code defines heritage trees as all eucalyptus windrows, any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20") or more, a multi - trunk having a diameter of thirty inches (30") or more, a stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival, and any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant because of age, size, condition, or aesthetic qualities. The existing trees along the north, west, and south project boundary will remain in place, the tree along the east property line appears to be dead, interferes with proposed driveway improvements, and will be removed. There are no trees located on the adjacent parcel included with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment applications. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Neither the City, nor the SOI, are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg67 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No 1—H Incorporated Impact Im act If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings.havefledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to biological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are 9 California Sycamore (Platanus racemosa) trees on site all planted with the development of the existing service station building; none of these 9 trees meat Development Code criteria to be considered a Heritage Tree. The Development Code defines heritage trees as all eucalyptus windrows, any tree in excess of thirty feet (30') in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20") or more, a multi - trunk having a diameter of thirty inches (30") or more, a stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival, and any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant because of age, size, condition, or aesthetic qualities. The existing trees along the north, west, and south project boundary will remain in place, the tree along the east property line appears to be dead, interferes with proposed driveway improvements, and will be removed. There are no trees located on the adjacent parcel included with the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment applications. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) Neither the City, nor the SOI, are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC -1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg67 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 20 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. Less Than a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant Wth Mitigationsignificant Than No b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance Im act Incorporated hn act Im act 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () () () (✓) of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance () (✓) () ( ) of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (✓) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) analyzed the potential impacts to cultural resources within the project site and its surroundings. The cultural resources records search from the CHRIS-SCIC indicated that there were no historical resources within the project area and no historical resources were identified during the pedestrian survey. The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan. Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to historical resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) analyzed the potential impacts to archaeological resources within the project site and its surroundings. The cultural resources records search from the CHRIS-SCIC indicated that there were no archaeological resources within the project area and no archaeological resources were identified during the pedestrian survey. There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the qualified archaeologist will take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg68 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 21 • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to archeological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg69 Less Than Signi/cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Sign, WN Mitigation Than Signileent No Im ad Inco orated Impact Im act • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to archeological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg69 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 22 mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to paleontological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by grading, existing on- site and surrounding development. The site has been previously disrupted during the construction existing on-site improvements, adjacent infrastructure, and surrounding developments. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1—E6 Pg70 Less Than Sigcant nifi Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Wth Wigalian Than Significant rvo Impact Incor orafetl Int act Int act mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to paleontological resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by grading, existing on- site and surrounding development. The site has been previously disrupted during the construction existing on-site improvements, adjacent infrastructure, and surrounding developments. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1—E6 Pg70 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 23 to human remains caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Less Than a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial Signillw Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially sgnircant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No death involving: Impact Incor aratetl Im atl Impact to human remains caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (✓) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including () () () (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () () () (✓) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or () () () (✓) that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS -2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes with approximately 1.0 miles northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4.0 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 14.0 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 16.0 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less -than -significant. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg71 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 24 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg72 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Patentially Signtricant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No MEW Incur oraletl Im ad Im act 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg72 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 25 association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga; including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. With adherence to standard building techniques in accordance with the building code, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater disposal requirements caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project. ess Than a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () SignificantIff]N () ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With H,Itigation eIncor environment? orated act association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to geology and soils caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga; including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Sandy Loam (HbA) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. With adherence to standard building techniques in accordance with the building code, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to wastewater disposal requirements caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project. a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation () adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of () K( ) greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance — The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(2) of the Clean Air Act: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg73 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 26 Rev 4-17 (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SFe)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile,and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station. and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PMio, PM2.e, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.e levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E1—E6 Pg74 Less Than earl Sigcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pat.4.11y signRlcant M"galion Than Significant No Impact Incor oraletl Im acl Im act Rev 4-17 (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SFe)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile,and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station. and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PMio, PM2.e, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM1o, and PM2.e levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E1—E6 Pg74 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 27 Rev 4-17 applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to greenhouse gases generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G. a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), total project related emissions would be 528 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table: E1—E6 Pg75 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than SignificantNo Impact Incor crated Im acc Im act Rev 4-17 applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to greenhouse gases generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. Project Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G. a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), total project related emissions would be 528 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table: E1—E6 Pg75 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 28 Rev 4-17 Gas Station Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Caitstiuc_tiarl GHG EmissioM (NTM) Less Than Ffs -tt fh` -. TOTAV 2016 70 <t 0 76 AMORTIZEDTCITAL" 3 Significant Less Mobile Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No I Im act Inco orated Im act Im act Rev 4-17 Gas Station Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Caitstiuc_tiarl GHG EmissioM (NTM) YeaeCt7z Ffs -tt fh` -. TOTAV 2016 70 <t 0 76 AMORTIZEDTCITAL" 3 <1 0 3 M.TCO2E Mobile Mute: Slight vartebns may occur due to rouncli g <1 ' Amortized twat 30 -years 487 Gas Station 0 rational Greenhouse Gas Emissions ' Sauiiie, COY GEiG Emissions h1TfYR CHi . . tha . . TOTAL. .' Energy 32 <f <1 32 Mobile 487 <1 0 487 Solid Waste I <1 0 2 W'aterM'astewater 3 <1 <1 3 TUTAL 523 <1 <f 525 WCO2ENR Note: Slight variations may oaur due to rounvrrnq Gas Station Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Sanrce GZIG Emissions ilrit , . TOTAL.. Construction 3 <1 0 3 Operation 523 <1 <t 525 Grand Total 522 ` NITCOMYR Nile- Slight variabons may occur due to rounding A Constructon impact- amortized over 30 -years As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions — The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel -powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil -based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cha, and. N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. E1—E6 Pg76 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 29 Rev 4-17 The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agenttwice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore, the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. E1—E6 Pg77 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Slgnreoanl With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inwr oratetl Impact Im ad Rev 4-17 The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agenttwice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore, the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. E1—E6 Pg77 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 30 Rev 4-17 The project is consistent with the California Environmental 'Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). E1—E6 Pg78 ess Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant Na Im act incorporates Im act Im act Rev 4-17 The project is consistent with the California Environmental 'Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). E1—E6 Pg78 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 31 Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets; dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1..22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Rev 4-17 No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted forthe purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re- use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed-use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1—E6 Pg79. Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Slgniecant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Im act Im act Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets; dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1..22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Rev 4-17 No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted forthe purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re- use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed-use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1—E6 Pg79. Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 32 due to greenhouse gases generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: Less Than a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources. Potentially signmcant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No disposal of hazardous materials? Impact Incor oraletl Im act Im act due to greenhouse gases generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () () () (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result; would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (✓) injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg80 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 33 (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office - Professional (OP) District to the west. As the project site is currently fully developed and proposed ground disturbance will be minimal and limited to the installation of new fuel tanks (the fuel tanks for the previous gas station were removed) and the installation of a 968 - square foot car wash building. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The proposed project includes the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 proposes to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 proposes to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts to the westerly 0.70 -acre project site are addressed above. When applications for easterly 0.52 -acre project site are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site is located within % mile of a sensitive receptor — a school directly north of the project site and residences that are to the north, south, east, and west of the site; however, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. According to the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG on August 2016, the proposed gas station and hypothetical commercial office/retail uses do not produce odors that could affect a substantial number of people. Fuel is stored in sealed, underground storage tanks Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg81 Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant Wth Mtlgatlon Than significant No Im act Incorporated Im act Im act (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office - Professional (OP) District to the west. As the project site is currently fully developed and proposed ground disturbance will be minimal and limited to the installation of new fuel tanks (the fuel tanks for the previous gas station were removed) and the installation of a 968 - square foot car wash building. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The proposed project includes the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. Therefore, no adverse impacts are expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 proposes to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 proposes to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts to the westerly 0.70 -acre project site are addressed above. When applications for easterly 0.52 -acre project site are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site is located within % mile of a sensitive receptor — a school directly north of the project site and residences that are to the north, south, east, and west of the site; however, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. According to the Air Quality and Climate Change Assessment prepared by MIG on August 2016, the proposed gas station and hypothetical commercial office/retail uses do not produce odors that could affect a substantial number of people. Fuel is stored in sealed, underground storage tanks Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg81 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 34 and pumps are equipped with emissions equipment designed to minimize evaporative loss. Considering the proposed gas station fuels are stored in a manner in which fumes are contained, odors from the project are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. A site inspection in October 2017 did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan (the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP)) according to the General Plan Figure PS -7 and. General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1; however, the site is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is compliant with the height limits of the ALUCP. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City, The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. g) The City has a -developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every 3 years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg82 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Slgnifcant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporate Im act Im act and pumps are equipped with emissions equipment designed to minimize evaporative loss. Considering the proposed gas station fuels are stored in a manner in which fumes are contained, odors from the project are not expected to affect a substantial number of people. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. A site inspection in October 2017 did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to hazards caused, and/or waste materials generated by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan (the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP)) according to the General Plan Figure PS -7 and. General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1; however, the site is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is compliant with the height limits of the ALUCP. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City, The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 and 112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. g) The City has a -developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every 3 years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg82 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 35 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access plans and evacuation routes caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Less Than a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () slgnifcant Less ( ) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Signmcartl With Mitigation Than Significant Na b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere Impact Incorpoestec Im act Im ad 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access plans and evacuation routes caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS -1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (✓) () ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (✓) g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as () () () (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures () () (✓) ( ) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, () () () (✓) injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (✓) Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg83 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 36 Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soil and containment for fuel spills, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: Rev 4-17 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that E1—E6 Pg84 Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially slgnil With Miu9atmn Than signi(wnt No Impact Inco oraletl Im act Im act Comments a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act, The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soil and containment for fuel spills, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: Rev 4-17 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that E1—E6 Pg84 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 37 shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan/Site Drainage Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods ,experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (Le., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational: Rev 4-17 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low E1—E6 Pg85 Less Than SigniGcanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith significant Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated impact Im act shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan/Site Drainage Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods ,experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (Le., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational: Rev 4-17 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low E1—E6 Pg85 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 38 Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building" and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) .District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in erosion caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg86 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Slgrll&ant With Mitigation Than significant No Im act Incorporated Int acl Int act Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality standards or waste discharge requirements caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC -3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to groundwater supplies or groundwater recharge caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building" and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) .District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in erosion caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg86 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 39 runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in flooding caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing' storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to existing or planned stormwater drainage systems caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development/significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E1—E6 Pg87 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than SigniloantNo Im act Incorporated Im act IMae ct runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to drainage patterns that results in flooding caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing' storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to existing or planned stormwater drainage systems caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development/significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When E1—E6 Pg87 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 40 applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to housing due to flood hazards caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. The project site is located within a 100 - year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. The project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to flood flow patterns caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) The project site is located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system. improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development would not impede or redirect floodwaters and would be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and E1—E6 Pg88 Less Ilan significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Inca orated Im act Im act applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to housing due to flood hazards caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) No housing units are proposed with this project. The project site is located within a 100 - year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. The project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to flood flow patterns caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. h) The project site is located within a 100 -year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS -5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system. improvements. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100 -year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS -6. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development would not impede or redirect floodwaters and would be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and E1—E6 Pg88 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 41 Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () ess Than () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Utigatmn Than Significant Ne (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific Impact Inco orated Impact Im act Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to water quality caused by those projects caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () ( ) ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project is designed consistent with ,the General Commercial (GC) District development standards and will include Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg89 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 42 elements that are consistent with surrounding development, thus becoming a part of the larger community. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Low Medium Residential, proposed General Commercial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC -4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- roject:a) Less Than a)Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially SignificantMiligalicn l'ith Than Significant :N--' residents of the State? Im act Inca oraletl Im act I elements that are consistent with surrounding development, thus becoming a part of the larger community. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Low Medium Residential, proposed General Commercial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC -4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project.- roject:a) a)Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local () () () (✓) general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC -2 and Table RC -1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (✓) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient () (✓) () ( ) noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg90 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681,DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 43 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () Less Than () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No expose people residing or working in the project area to tinned Incor orated Im act Im act e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figures PS -9 and PS -10. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office - Professional (OP) District to the west. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Rev 4-17 Due to the proximity of the site to both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route a Noise Study (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) was prepared for the project site. According to the model used in the Noise Study, temporary noise increases during construction of the proposed gas station and the retail use will be greatest during the demolition and grading phases. The model indicates that graders, tractors, and dozers could expose the single family residential use located approximately 222 feet to the east of the center of the gas station site (APN: 0208-291-05) to a combined noise level of 76.6 dBA during construction of the proposed gas station and a combined noise level of 85.0 dBA during construction of the hypothetical retail use. Because noise levels during construction are anticipated to exceed the City's standard of 65 dBA at the residential receptors and 70 dBA at the commercial and school receptors, mitigation measures will be necessary to reduce the impacts. With the implementation of identified mitigation measures below and in 12.d, construction noise will be reduced to unsubstantial levels and no substantial impact will occur. For operational impacts the report identified that the increase in vehicular traffic on Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route due to the proposed project will not result in noise levels exceeding the 65 dBA standard established by the City for residential use and 70 dBA for commercial uses and will not result in a perceptible noise increase. Therefore, no substantial impacts will occur. Noise levels from operation of the proposed carwash was also modeled to determine the level of impact to the residential use to the east and the school to the north. Dryers at the carwash exit can generate noise levels of up to 100 dBA. The proposed project includes an existing 6 -foot concrete wall along the northern and eastern boundaries of the site. According to the modeling, the residential use to the east of the project site could be exposed to temporary noise levels of 48.9 dBA and the E1—E6 Pg91 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 44 Rev 4-17 school located to the north of the project site could be exposed to temporary noise levels of 30.2 dBA when cars exit the car wash. Noise related to operation of the carwash will be within acceptable levels for residential and school uses. No substantial impacts will occur Therefore, based on the information provided in the Noise Analysis, the proposed project would not expose people to or generate noise levels in excess of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. With the following standard mitigation measures and special mitigation measures, the noise impacts on the project will be less than significant. Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans or building plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 4) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 5) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 6) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. E1—E6 Pg92 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant Wth MiCigation Than significant No Im act Incor orated Im act Im act Rev 4-17 school located to the north of the project site could be exposed to temporary noise levels of 30.2 dBA when cars exit the car wash. Noise related to operation of the carwash will be within acceptable levels for residential and school uses. No substantial impacts will occur Therefore, based on the information provided in the Noise Analysis, the proposed project would not expose people to or generate noise levels in excess of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. With the following standard mitigation measures and special mitigation measures, the noise impacts on the project will be less than significant. Exterior: 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans or building plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 4) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 5) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 6) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. E1—E6 Pg92 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 45 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to excessive ground borne vibration or noise caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg93 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWith Significant Allrgaucn Than slgniricant 14. Im act Incur oraletl kn act Ianact General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to excessive ground borne vibration or noise caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to increased ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg93 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 46 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit evidence of noise control measures that include 1) vibratory pile drivers or other pile driving noise controls, 2) temporary sound curtains at least 8 feet tall placed around all noise producing equipment, and 3) fitting appropriate mufflers that achieve a minimum 20 dBA reduction in construction -related noise levels. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6Pg94 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Wth Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporate Im act Im act 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit evidence of noise control measures that include 1) vibratory pile drivers or other pile driving noise controls, 2) temporary sound curtains at least 8 feet tall placed around all noise producing equipment, and 3) fitting appropriate mufflers that achieve a minimum 20 dBA reduction in construction -related noise levels. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The site is not located within an airport land use plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6Pg94 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 47 The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project Less Than a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially signircant with Mitigation Than Significant No businesses) or indirectly (for example, through Impact Incor eratetl Im act Im act The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to population growth levels caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project site contains an existing service station and fuel canopy and there are no housing units on the property. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to existing housing caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The project site contains an existing service station and fuel canopy and there are no housing units on the property. Therefore, no adverse impact is expected. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map E1—E6Pg95 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 48 Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN:0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial Less Than adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signi(wnt No physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of Im act In<ot orated Im act Im act Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN:0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (✓) b) Police protection? () () () (✓) C) Schools? () () () (✓) d) Parks? () 0 (✓) e) Other public facilities? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The project site, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, would be served by Fire Station #174 at 11297 Jersey Boulevard, located approximately 2.4 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to fire protection services caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: E1—E6 Pg96 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 49 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to police protection services caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to schools caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park located at 9094 Arrow Route, is located approximately 0.7 miles west of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to parks caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developing area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg97 lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im act incorporated impact Im act 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) due to police protection services caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to schools caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park located at 9094 Arrow Route, is located approximately 0.7 miles west of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to parks caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developing area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg97 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 50 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to other public facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: Less Than a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () Signifwnt Lass (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotentiallyWth significant Miligaticn Than significant No substantial physical deterioration of the facility would Impact Incur oratatl Im act Im act General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to other public facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 15. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional () () () (✓) parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require () () () (✓) the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Bear Gulch Park located at 9094 Arrow Route, is located approximately 0.7 miles west of the project site. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to recreational facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and; if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) The project does not include the development of new or the expansion of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 16. TRANS PORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () () () (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg98 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 51 b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management () Less Than () (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service Fen'v. Peai Heoa Significant Less Inhaurtl Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Signifcant No standards established by the county congestion Im act Incorporated Impact Im act b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management () () () (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service Fen'v. Peai Heoa Sourtea Inhaurtl standards and travel demand measures, or other Tool Neeund h[bvrd Tepl O:1M standards established by the county congestion 1 fP RE956 6.04 management agency for designated roads or 11 U. 7.0) 6.79 1555 15281 highways? 6 FP nTP6 1a d0 C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either () () () (✓) an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that is Is 36 25 21 result in substantial safety risks? 1,102 d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Comments: a) The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The proposed project is forecast to generate 1,102 daily trips, with 95 trips in the a.m. peak hour (36 net new trips), and 111 trips in the p.m. peak hour (49 net new trips) (Kuzman Associates, May 2017), as shown in the following table: Rev 4-17 Pro'p_ct Trip Genetaticn L-rtluz Gaanc'ry UiLr Til, Gecenan Rre:Rrip Germsd Llo.nlnq PeakHwr Fen'v. Peai Heoa Sourtea Inhaurtl Omand Tool Neeund h[bvrd Tepl O:1M rSo Gee on Ra Ga: S:a!ianwiA Cmv. L•.xket SCar N'sh 1 fP RE956 6.04 S.s0 11 U. 7.0) 6.79 1555 15281 Ti :Generxd GaeSn[f,n rim Cmv.Idahet Sfarwa:h FadYTriP Reducdm l6Y: Sbh 56ti PMP 6 FP nTP6 1a d0 c7 -s9 95 57 -59 -0I 51 d0 111 -6i I'm -121 He[Prvjea Trip-6eoan[N is Is 36 25 21 19 1,102 Under existing conditions, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates at satisfactory LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours. Under the existing E1—E6Pg99 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 52 Rev 4-17 condition plus project year scenario, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates satisfactorily at LOS C or in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour. The City Engineer reviewed the Traffic Impact Study submitted for the project and concurs with the report's findings that the project will have no significant impact. Existing Levels of Service (LOS) Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service Intersection Traffic Control Less Than Peak Hcur Delay -LOS' Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Signi i-nl Less L T R Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Wlh Mitigation Than Significant No 1 2 tl Impact Inmr orated Impact Im act Rev 4-17 condition plus project year scenario, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates satisfactorily at LOS C or in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour. The City Engineer reviewed the Traffic Impact Study submitted for the project and concurs with the report's findings that the project will have no significant impact. Existing Levels of Service (LOS) Existing Intersection Delay and Level of Service Intersection Traffic Control Intersection Approach Lanes` Peak Hcur Delay -LOS' Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R L T R L T R Morning Evening Archibald Avenue (NS) at. Arrow Rone(EW)-42 TS 1 2 d 1 1.5 1 1 1.5 0.5 1 2 tl 28.9-L 33.3-C Existing Plus Project Levels of Service (LOS) Existing Plus Project Intersection Delay and Level of Service The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to,issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the performance of the transportation/traffic circulation system caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg100 Intersection Approach Lanes' Peak Hour Northbound Southbound Eastbound I WeittOlnld Traffic Delay -LOS° Intersection Control' L T R L T R L T R L T P. Morning Evening Archibald Avenue INS) at: Project Driveway (ENI)- 91 CSS 0 1.5 0.5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0.5 D 0.5 15.4-C 29.0-D Arrow Route (EW) -92 TS 1 d 1 15 1 1 1.5 D.5 1 2 d 29.1-C 33.7-C Project Drimmay (NS) at, Arrow. Route EW -p3 1 CSS 0 0 0 05 0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0 D 1.5 0.5 1 24.3-C 32.2-D The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to,issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to the performance of the transportation/traffic circulation system caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg100 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 53 b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a congestion management program caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) Located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air traffic patterns caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed with commercial and residential developments. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1—E6 Pg101 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant Wfh Mnlgafron Than signlficanf No Im act Inror oraletl Im act Im act b) In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a congestion management program caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. C) Located approximately 2.5 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to air traffic patterns caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed with commercial and residential developments. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) E1—E6 Pg101 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 54 of transportation design features associated with those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project design provides typical features to support transportation including local infrastructure (e.g., streets, sidewalks, and traffic/pedestrian signals), level topography, supporting transportation, and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg102 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant With Khgatian Than significant No Im acl Incor orated Impact impact of transportation design features associated with those projects will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to emergency access caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. The project design provides typical features to support transportation including local infrastructure (e.g., streets, sidewalks, and traffic/pedestrian signals), level topography, supporting transportation, and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. E1—E6 Pg102 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC20.16-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 55 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause Less Than a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially signinaam Im act Wth Mitigation moor orates Than significant Im act No Impact 17. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with the cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of () () () (✓) Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(K), or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its () (✓) () ( ) discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Comments: a) As defined in Public Resources Code 21074 and applying the criteria located in Public Resources Code Section 5024.1(c), the project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, 2016) was performed on the project site. In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. The cultural resources records search indicated that there were no historic resources within the Study Area and none were identified during the pedestrian survey. The cultural resources records search identified a total of 3 cultural resource investigations that have been conducted within a 1 -mile radius of the project site; these include three built -environment resources. The three build environments have been classified as residential homes; none of these are eligible for listing in either the National Register or the California Register due to room additions, alterations, and extensive remodeling. These historic resources will not be impacted by the proposed project. Rev 4-17 The study also included consultation with Native American Heritage Commission and a requested review of the Sacred Lands Files to determine if any recorded Native American sacred sites or locations of religious or ceremonial importance are present within one mile of the project site. The NAHC SLF records search results revealed that there are no known "Native American cultural resources" in the SLF database within the Study Area. As per NAHC suggested procedure, follow-up letters were sent via certified mail on October 13, 2015 to the 8 Native American individuals and organizations identified by the NAHC as being affiliated with the vicinity of the Study Area to request any additional information they may have about Native American cultural resources that may be affected by the proposed project. As of November 9, 2015, the consultant had received 1 response concerning the proposed project. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation requested that at least 1 Native American Monitor be present during all ground disturbing activities within the project area. No other responses from the Native American community concerning the proposed project were received. The study concludes with the absence of E1—E6 Pg103 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 56 cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to historical resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, 2016) was performed on the project site. In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. The cultural resources records search indicated that there were no historic resources within the Study Area and none were identified during the pedestrian survey. The cultural resources records search identified a total of 3 cultural resource investigations that have been conducted within a 1 - mile radius of the project site; these include three built -environment resources. Rev 4-17 No potentially significant cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the project area. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during project related construction activities, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until a qualified archaeologist can visit the site of discovery and assess the significance of the archaeological resource. As well, Health and Safety Code 7050.5, CEQA 15064.5(e), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in the unlikely event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests for General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, and the Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians. The notices were mailed on August 25, 2015 and provided for a 90 -day comment period ending on November 23, 2015. Of the 5 tribes who were notified, none submitted a response requesting consultation during the notification period. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians following a completeness determination for Design Review DRC2015-00682. The notices were mailed on February 14, 2018 and provided for a 30 -day comment period ending on March 19, 2018. Responses were received from two tribes: the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN). The SMBMI did not, request consultation, but did request that specific conditions related to funerary objects, cultural resources, and historical resources discovered during ground disturbing activities be addressed. Applicable mitigation measures are included below. The GBMI-KN requested consultation, which was held on March 21, 2018, and their comments are included in the mitigation measures below. E1—E6Pg104 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially sigotfcant wlh Mitigation Than Signif m No Impact Incorporated Im act Im act cultural resources in the current project area and surrounding vicinity, no additional cultural work is recommended. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to historical resources caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. b) In conformance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5, a Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, 2016) was performed on the project site. In conjunction with the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton, the California Historical Resources Information was also consulted. The cultural resources records search indicated that there were no historic resources within the Study Area and none were identified during the pedestrian survey. The cultural resources records search identified a total of 3 cultural resource investigations that have been conducted within a 1 - mile radius of the project site; these include three built -environment resources. Rev 4-17 No potentially significant cultural resources were identified during the cultural resource survey of the project area. In the event that potentially significant archaeological materials are encountered during project related construction activities, all work must be halted in the vicinity of the archaeological discovery until a qualified archaeologist can visit the site of discovery and assess the significance of the archaeological resource. As well, Health and Safety Code 7050.5, CEQA 15064.5(e), and Public Resources Code 5097.98 mandate the process to be followed in the unlikely event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. As required by Senate Bill 18 (SB 18), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests for General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, and the Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians. The notices were mailed on August 25, 2015 and provided for a 90 -day comment period ending on November 23, 2015. Of the 5 tribes who were notified, none submitted a response requesting consultation during the notification period. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation, the Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manual Band of Mission Indians, the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians following a completeness determination for Design Review DRC2015-00682. The notices were mailed on February 14, 2018 and provided for a 30 -day comment period ending on March 19, 2018. Responses were received from two tribes: the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN). The SMBMI did not, request consultation, but did request that specific conditions related to funerary objects, cultural resources, and historical resources discovered during ground disturbing activities be addressed. Applicable mitigation measures are included below. The GBMI-KN requested consultation, which was held on March 21, 2018, and their comments are included in the mitigation measures below. E1—E6Pg104 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 57 Rev 4-17 Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. 1) The applicant shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submitthe results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Priorto the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the projectfor the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy.equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation E1—E6 Pg105 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially signmca Wlh Mafgauen Than signrca Ne Im act Inco oraletl Im acl Im act Rev 4-17 Should any undocumented archaeological or cultural resources be discovered during ground disturbing activities, adherence to the mitigation measures listed below will ensure that all impacts will be less than significant. 1) The applicant shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submitthe results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Priorto the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the projectfor the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy.equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation E1—E6 Pg105 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 58. Rev 4-17 shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3), In the event that Native American cultural, resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 - foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior, standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permittedlinvited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribes) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and 'curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section '15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be E1—E6 Pg1'06 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially signifi. With Mitigation Than Significant No Impactt Incor orated Im act Im act Rev 4-17 shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3), In the event that Native American cultural, resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 - foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior, standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permittedlinvited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribes) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and 'curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section '15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be E1—E6 Pg1'06 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 59 ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI-KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a California Native American tribe caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Less Than a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially signircant win Mitigation Tran significant No b) Require or result in the construction of new water or Impact Inco orates Im act Im act ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI-KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to a California Native American tribe caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. 18. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm water () () () (✓) drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg107 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 60 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () Lass Than () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it Signi(cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant Wlh Mitigation Than Significant I No demand in addition to the provider's existing Impact Inver orated Im act Im act e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity () () () (✓) to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -1 and RP -4 treatment plants. The RP -1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP -4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more'than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to recreational facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP -4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP -1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg108 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 61 Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to storm water drainage facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Less Than a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () Significant Less (✓) Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant WT Mirgatlnn Than Significant Na habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or Impact Inca aratetl Im act Im act Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 is a proposal to change the land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684 is a proposal to change the land use district from the Low Medium (LM) District to the General Commercial (GC) District for two (2) parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Potential impacts related to APN: 0208-291-05 are addressed above. When applications for APN: 0208-291-06 are submitted for review by the City, the impact (if any) to storm water drainage facilities caused by that project will be evaluated and, if necessary, the applicable mitigation measures will be implemented. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 19. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with ,the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The project proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for a 1.22 acre 2 -parcel site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. The project site Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg109 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 62 is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development is not anticipated to adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. The contribution of the project to cumulative biological impacts is not expected to be cumulatively considerable as the project site is within an urban area, is relatively small, and is isolated from areas of better habitat and is fully developed with an existing service station. No cultural resources are known to exist on the site; however, in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontological resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). The Traffic Impact Assessment prepared for the project site (Kuzman Associates, May 2017) identifies that under existing conditions, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates at satisfactory LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours and under the existing condition plus project year scenario, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates satisfactorily at LOS C or in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact and includes mitigation measures to reduce emission levels to a less than significant impact on the environment (see Air Quality section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures). Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. As prescribed by SCAQMD, the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg110 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially signieaant w1th Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incor orated Im act Im act is characterized by the Mulberry Early Education Center in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the north, a commercial center in the General Commercial (GC) District to the south, residential uses in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the east, and vacant land in the Office -Professional (OP) District to the west. According to the General Plan Figure RC -4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development is not anticipated to adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. The contribution of the project to cumulative biological impacts is not expected to be cumulatively considerable as the project site is within an urban area, is relatively small, and is isolated from areas of better habitat and is fully developed with an existing service station. No cultural resources are known to exist on the site; however, in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontological resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). The Traffic Impact Assessment prepared for the project site (Kuzman Associates, May 2017) identifies that under existing conditions, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates at satisfactory LOS C or better during the AM and PM peak hours and under the existing condition plus project year scenario, the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection operates satisfactorily at LOS C or in the AM peak hour and LOS D in the PM peak hour. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact and includes mitigation measures to reduce emission levels to a less than significant impact on the environment (see Air Quality section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures). Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. As prescribed by SCAQMD, the Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg110 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 63 August 2016), this analysis concluded that because the on-site emissions are low, the emissions would not exceed the ambient air quality standards prescribed by the SCAQMD. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. A Noise Study (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) was submitted for the project that reviewed the potential interior and exterior noise levels. The report concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures (see Noise section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures), the proposed project would not expose people to or generate noise levels in excess of the standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies and any elevated interior and exterior noise levels associated with the construction or operation of the proposed project would be reduced to less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were Within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (✓) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (✓) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (✓) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, Certified January 4, 1989) TECHNICAL APPENDICES (✓) Air Quality & Climate Change Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) (✓) Noise Study (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 2016) (✓) Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (MIG Hogle-Ireland, August 15, 2016) (✓) Traffic Impact Analysis (Kunzman Associates, Inc., May 17, 2017) Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg111 Initial Study for DRC2015-00683, DRC2015-00684, City of Rancho Cucamonga DRC2015-00681, DRC2015-00682, DRC2016-00831, and DRC2017-00879 Page 64 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: � Date: ,i - So — IR) Print Name and Title: M%VA0r"L V�Ail\-i i tivacaPwt Ria S�TcAc�JS Rev 4-17 E1—E6 Pg 112 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2015-00682 Applicant: Archibald Oil Initial Study Prepared by: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner Date: June 13, 2018 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Mon toring Fre u ncy Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance u $ecti iri3'Air Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) During grading activity, all construction PD/BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 equipment (>_ 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (GARB) Tier 3 j Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or PD/BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that Page 1 of 18 m_ I m v A Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD as well as City Planning staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low- pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering ractices. I • Sweep streets according to a schedule I BO I C I During construction A 4 Page 2 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high BO C During construction A 4 winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tars or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce Particulate Matter PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. Long Term Emissions 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 19) All commercial structures shall be required to PD C Review of plans D 2/3 incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting Page 3 of 18 M i M C) v rn Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 20) All commercial structures shall be required to PD C Review of plans D 2/3 incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stri in . Section�4Bwlogicat �esoUrc�s n six a t'"a _ Y l 3= l z ' c ' l '�Mx_. ln..iL�A-`J'fR au n. nYTas.'?a'iv J2. T+...� .Y+ • Y s ✓ -. _ TT V..u..: f a.. i1'.4 � _ v+1 % 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation PD B Review of plans B 2/4 or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) i the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non - raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Sec4iont5 I CIIEUYaIRscces� dt `c'_� ' s^��� .m nt k f • r dl � 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve Page 4 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with P/D B/C Review of AID Section 21083.2 Archeological resources Plans/Report During of CEQA to eliminate adverse project Construction effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings j that will also provide specific recommendations Page 5 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD B Review of report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered PD D Review of report D 3 fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. :4 }'+-0 J' 'a +Y4 :'"" .✓.'4'K. p. . J.r Section 6S Geol`o'gaifdSoils-M u� my »'moi ? Y r _ u+ f Z.t i?' iC '= i' ? r Y 'i. G' .-..7."7.:.. _ 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re- planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During construction A 4 according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Page 6 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. n4C re i'. -66. L`MEff i •` t \y Secttont7 Greenhons��Gas Errtisslohs�.���1,;.; L`...� _*e .yam y t y. I a.....ri.....u.,w Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO C During construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select BO C During construction A 4 construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During construction A 4 than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During construction A 4 interfere withpeak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During construction A 4 supported and encouraged for construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use Page 7 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound VOC materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California BO A During Construction C 2 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds, and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation BO A During Construction C 2 strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless Page 8 of 18 m rn v N Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition CE A Review of plans C 2 waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. S'n" , ' n E`: W f Section�9� H drolo �" da�/1laierQuahf� Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Page 9 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational .. 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the.storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Page 10 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Com liancc Grading Activities 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs SO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Sectr'�Tm'ois } PSS yn' ion 1f2 NO�Se :S}yw i F 4t Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a PD/BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise PD/BO E Review of plans A/C 7 level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. __'B__ 3) During all project site excavation and grading, DO Review of plans A/C 214 the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 4) The project contractor shall place all stationary BO B Review of plans A/C 214 construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 5) The construction contractor shall locate BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction - related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. Page 11 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 6) The construction contractor shall obtain the CE B Review of plans D 2/4 City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall change the PD/BO C Review of plans A 2/4 timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 8) During construction, the contractor shall PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. 11) Construction or grading shall not take place BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, BO B/C Review of plans A/C 2/4 the applicant shall submit evidence of noise control measures that include 1) vibratory pile drivers or other pile driving noise controls, 2) temporary sound curtains at least 8 feet tall placed around all noise producing equipment, and 3) fitting appropriate mufflers that achieve a minimum 20 dBA reduction in construction - related noise levels. 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Page 12 of 18 M i M rn v N to Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 between the hoursof 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 'I-.HMa'-PvLi-3i .wM Secbon lf7 Tlnbal cul uYa[=.ResouYcesW R xV `i Lt frr•a��..-4:.�".0 r ,n ��a� � ms 'y1 'K".^xv.'L � 3 'r+ � ...� r � r, � : ^..9. x.. ,,,.•=„a.M i +C -.a=. ',.'_a:. y 1) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno PD/BO C Review of plans A/D 3/4 Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI- KN) and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on- site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural' materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation Page 13 of 18 m I m v LIMN rn Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on- site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary PD/130 C Review of plans A/D 3/4 objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel Page 14 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Com lianc plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24 hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure complete recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities are to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3) In the event that Native American cultural PD/BO C Review of plans A/D 3/4 resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 -foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and Page 15 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Com lianci the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include Page 16 of 18 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Cam lianci implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American PD/BO C Review of plans A/D 3/4 historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI- KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be PD/BO C Review of plans A/D 3/4 inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Page 17 of 18 Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for I Non -Com liana Once ground -altering activities have ceased B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy or the Project Archaeologist determines that D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds monitoring activities are no longer necessary, ' Revoke CUP F�_� monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. Key to Checklist Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . m-­Frequency*—Y",; City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879. This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above -listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components — This MMP contains the following elements: Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management— The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures — The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga — Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 EXHIBIT O E1—E6 Pg131 Mitigation Monitoring Program GPA DRC2015-00683, ZMA DRC2015-00684, DR DRC2015-00682, CUP DRC2015-00681, VAR DRC2016-00831, and ME DRC2017-00879. Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner, or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. , 4. The project planner, or responsible City department, will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. E1—E6 Pg132 BURRTE WASTE INDUSTWES, iNC. "We'll Take Care Of it" May 18, 2018 Mr. Donald Granger, Senior Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Re: Archibald Oil DRC2015-00681 Dear Mr. Granger: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 2 1 2018 RECEIVED - PLANNING Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. is in receipt of the Initial Study for a service station remodeling project located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. Based upon the Site Plan included in the package, we understand that the project will include a service station, car wash, and convenience store. A new trash enclosure is proposed for the northeast corner of the property. Access may be taken from both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a driveway looped around the building. Based upon the information provided, Burrtec should be able to adequately service the new trash enclosure. AB 341 and AB 1826 require that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program. Businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. Please be advised that the project will require at least a three (3) cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables. The project should also make provisions to provide for an additional bin In the trash enclosure for food waste. Depending upon the amount of food waste generated, the project may be serviced with 96 -gallon carts or a two (2) cubic yard bin. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this project. If you have any questions regarding our comments, please feel free to contact me at (909) 429-4200 or gkoontz@burrtec.com. Sincerely, 04 Z� Gary Koontz Facility Project Manager C):9.,N7 r:hP,. , q•.`.,.,•.. Fontana, California 92335 909-429-4200 • FAX 909-429-4290 EXHIBIT P E1—E6Pg133 Matthew Rodriquez Secretary for Environmental Protection May 23, 2018 Mr. Tom Grahn Department of Toxic Substances Control Barbara A. Lee, Director 5796 Corporate Avenue Cypress, California 90630 Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Tom.Grahn &Citvofrc.com Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 3 0 2W RECEIVED - PLANNING INITIAL STUDY AND PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (ND) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-00681 (ARCHIBALD OIL), LOCATED AT ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, RACHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY (SCH# 2018051011) Dear. Grahn: The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has reviewed the subject ND. The following project description is stated in the ND: 'The applicant, Archibald Oil, proposes to amend the General Plan land use designation from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and to amend the Zoning Map land use district from the Low Medium (LM) Residential District to the General Commercial (GC) District for 2 parcels (APNs: 0208-291-05 and 0208-291-06) with a combined area of 1.22 acres located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. The applicant also proposes to re-establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacantlinactive service station that consists of a 1,728-squarefoot service station building, a 1,481 -square foot fuel pump canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and to construct a 968 -square foot car wash on APN: 0208-291-05. There is no proposal for development of APN: 0208-291-06 associated with this project." Based on the review of the submitted document DTSC has the following comments: The ND should identify and determine whether current or historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous wastes/substances. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment may be appropriate to identify any recognized environmental conditions. EXHIBIT Q E1—E6 Pg134 Mr. Tom Grahn May 23, 2018 Page 2 2. If there are any recognized environmental conditions in the project area, then proper investigation, sampling and remedial actions overseen by the appropriate regulatory agencies should be conducted prior to the new development or any construction. 3. DTSC recommends evaluation, proper investigation and mitigation, if necessary, on onsite areas with current or historic PCB -containing transformers. 4. The ND states, 'The applicant also proposes to re-establish the operation (including retail sales) of an existing vacant/inactive service station that consists of ... APN: 0208-291-05." If the site was used as a service station in the past, please identify whether underground storage tanks (USTs) were used at the site and the status of those USTs along with the following information in the ND: a. Identify the name(s) of the regulatory agency(ies) approved the closure of any USTs at the site. b. Indicate whether the UST resulted in soil/groundwater contamination. If soil/groundwater is impacted, then evaluate potential vapor intrusion onsite associated with soil/groundwater contamination. c. DTSC is unable to evaluate whether vapor sampling and/or potential vapor intrusion risk was adequately addressed due to lack of relevant detailed information in the ND. 5. If soil contamination is suspected or observed in the project area, then excavated soil should be sampled prior to export/disposal. If the soil is contaminated, it should be disposed of properly in accordance with all applicable and relevant laws and regulations. In addition, if the project proposes to import soil to backfill the excavated areas, proper evaluation and/or sampling should be conducted to make sure that the imported soil is free of contamination. 6. If during construction/demolition of the project, soil and/or groundwater contamination is suspected, construction/demolition in the area should cease and appropriate health and safety procedures should be implemented. If it is determined that contaminated soil and/or groundwater exist, the ND should identify how any required investigation and/or remediation will be conducted, and the appropriate government agency to provide regulatory oversight. E1 -E6 Pg135 Mr. Tom Grahn May 23, 2018 Page 3 If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at (714) 484-5380 or by email at Johnson.Abrahamadtsc.ca.gov. Sincerely, J h son P. Abraham —_ tPr j ct Manager Brownfields Restoration and School Evaluation Branch Site Mitigation and Restoration Program - Cypress kl/sh/ja cc: Governor's Office of Planning and Research (via e-mail) State Clearinghouse P.O. Box 3044 Sacramento, California 95812-3044 State.clearinghouse(@opr.ca.gov Mr. Dave Kereazis (via e-mail) Office of Planning & Environmental Analysis Department of Toxic Substances Control Dave. Kereazis(@dtsc.ca.gov Mr. Shahir Haddad, Chief (via e-mail) Schools Evaluation and Brownfields Cleanup Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program - Cypress Shah ir.HaddadCcildtsc.ca.gov CEQA# 2018051011 E1–E6 Pg136 MICHAEL PAULS ASSOCIATES 6475 E PACIFIC COAST HWY #135 LONG BEACH CA 90803 PH (562) 4342835 June 4, 2018 Mr. Tom Grahn Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91729 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUN 0 4 2018 RECEIVED - PLANNING RE: 8477 Archibald Avenue (GPA)DRC2015-00683; (ZMA)DRC 2015-00684; (CUP)DRC2015-00681; (V)DRC2016-00831 Response to comments from the Department of Toxic Substance Control Dear Mr. Grahn: Please accept this letter in response to the comments provided by the Department of Toxic Substances Control. Please see attached Remedial Action Completion Certificate letter, dated November 5, 2001, issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshal, Hazardous Materials Division, for the subject site, reference as #2001012 indicating that no further remediation action is required. Additionally, there has never been and currently does not have any transformers containing PCB on the site. Sincerely, MichaP Pa,u4 Attachment: County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Letter dated November 5, 2001 E1—E6 Pg137 COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE FIRE NIARSHAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION 385 Norlh Arrowhead Avenue, Second Floor • San Bernardino CA 92415-0153 REMEDIAL ACTION COMPLETION CERTIFICATION NOV 0 5 2001 MOBIL OIL CORPORATIOf SITE of 2001012 3700 W. 190TH STREET TORRANCE, CA 90509 ATTENTION: JOHNNY MEDRANO COUNTY OF SAN BE9NARDINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC SERVICES GROUP PETER R. HILLS Fire Chief Codnty Fire warden SUBJECT: UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) CASE CLOSURE FOR MOBIL 18-AJ6, 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE REPORT D, .TED 3/21/01 This letter confirms the completion of site invc ligation and corrective action for the underground storage tank(s) former] located at the above- described location. Thank you for your cooperation thl,. _.ghout this investigation. Your willingness and promptness in responding to our inquiries concerning the former underground storage tank(s) are greatly appreciated. Based on information in the above -referenced file and with the provision that the information provided to this agency was accurate and representative of site conditions, this agency finds that the site investigation and corrective action carried out at your underground storage tank(s) site is in compliance with requirements of subdivisions (a) and (b) of Section 25299.37 of the Health and Safety Code and with corrective action regulat;ons adopted pursuant to Section 25299.77 of the Health and Safety Code and t tat no fi_rrth ,r acfinn related to the petroleum release(s) at the site is required.. This notice is issued pursuant ) subdivision (h) of Section 25299.37 of the Health and Safety Code. Please contact Ja :kson Crutsinger of our office at (909) 387-3041 if you have any questions regi Jing this matter. Sincerely, ,t RVO VED DEC 1 12a PETER S. BRIERTY PD.'"lISION C:iIEF HAZARDOUS MATERi„LS DIVI: iON cc: Rose Scott, Santa Ana R: ;ional Water Quality C ntrol Bo -.rd Nancy Comacho, State W ier Resources Contn 3oard E1 -E6 Pg138 South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 9 f 765-4178 (909) 396-2000 - w,#vw.agmd.gov SENT VIA E-MAIL AND USPS: Tom.Grahn(rucityofrc.us Toni Grafin, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOJ&29, 2018 MAY 2 9 2018 RECEIVED - PLANNING Mitigated Negative Declaration (BIND) for the Proposed Archibald Oil (General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684, Design Review DRC2015-00682, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681, Variance DRC2016-00831, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00879) The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to cotmnent on the above-mentioned document. The following continent is meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the Final MND. SCAOMD Staff's Summar• of the Project Description The Lead Agency proposes to re-establish the operation of a gas service station that consists of a 1,728 - square -foot service station building, a 1,481 -square -foot fueling pump canopy with four pumps, and a 968 -square -foot car wash on 1.22 acres (Proposed Project). According to the MND, the Proposed Project is partially surrounded by sensitive land uses such as an early education center to the north and residential uses to the east and west (across Archibald Avenue). Construction is expected to take approximately six monthst. SCAQMD Staffs Comments Permits and Compliance with SCAQMD Rules Since the Proposed Project involves operation of a gasoline service station, a permit from the SCAQMD would be required, and the SCAQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Please note that any assumptions used in the air quality analysis in the Final MND will be the basis for permit conditions and limits. The Final MND should also demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules, including, but are not limited to, Rule 201 — Permit to Construct, Rule 203 — Permit to Operate, and Rule 461 — Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing. If there are permitting questions concerning the gasoline service station, they can be directed to SCAQMD Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-2551. Air Quality Analysis — Operational Impacts In the Air Quality analysis. the Lead Agency found that the Proposed Project's regional and localized construction and operational air quality impacts would be less than significant. However, it does not appear that the Air Quality analysis included operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process. This may have likely led to an under -estimation of the Proposed Project's operational air quality impacts. It is important to note that while CatEEMod2 quantifies mobile source KIND. Appendix A. Cal£Ebfod Output. 2 CalEEmod incorporates up-to-date state and locally approved emission factor and methodologies for estimating pollutant emissions from typical land use development. CalEEMod is the only software model maintained by the California Air Pollution Cnntrnl nfr.,•.v. a "' "^OA) and is available free of charge at: a ww.caleenurd.com. EXHIBIT R E1—E6 Pg 139 Tom Grahn 2 May 29, 2018 emissions (e.g., trip visits by patrons) associated with operating a gasoline service station, CaIEEMod does not quantify the operational stationary source emissions from the storage tanks and fueling equipment. Therefore, it is recommended that the Lead Agency use its best efforts to quantify and disclose operational emissions from the fueling process in the Final MND. Health Risk Assessment (HR4) Analts•is In the MND, the Lead Agency stated that a HRA analysis is not required for the Proposed Project because the Proposed Project does not include use of stationary emergency or prince compression ignition internal combustion engines, portable diesel engines, or other equipment subject to AB2588'. SCAQMD staff disagrees with the analysis. Enacted in 1987, AB2588 is an air toxics hot spots program and requires stationary sources to report the types and quantities of certain substances routinely released into the air. An AB2588 Air Toxics Hot Spot Health Risk Assessment (HRA) estimates potential health risks over a lifetime of exposure from air toxics for eris�tin¢ facilities (ErrJ)hasis arfdeafl pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 1402 and does not apply to new or planned facilities. Here, the Proposed Project is a new or planned gasoline service facility that is subject to the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1401. Therefore, AB2588 HRA should not be used as a screening tool to determine if a HRA analysis is warranted for the Proposed Project. Moreover, since the operation of gasoline stations will emit air toxics, HRAs are required as part of the SCAQMD permitting requirements for gasoline stations'. Any assumptions used in the HRA analysis in the Final MND will be used as the basis for pemtit conditions and limits. Furthermore, the Proposed Project would be located in close proximity to existing sensitive receptors such as residents and children at the early education center, thereby warranting a HRA analysis. Benzene. which is a toxic air contaminant, may be emitted from the Proposed Project's gasoline refueling operations. Given SCAQMD staffs concern about the potential health impacts on the residents and children from being exposed to benzene, it is recommended that the Lead Agency evaluate, quantify, and perform a gasoline dispensing station HRAs for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Guidance for performing this HRA can be found in the SCAQMD's Emission Lnventmy and Risk Assessment Guidelines for Gasoline DispensingStaitions'. Guidance Regarding Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Sited Near Sensitive Receptors SCAQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions. To facilitate stronger collaboration between Lead Agencies and SCAQMD to reduce community exposure to source -specific and cumulative air pollution impacts, SCAQMD adopted the Guidance Document.for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning' in 2005. Additional guidance is available in the California Air Resources Board (CARS) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook. A Carnnwnin- Health Perspective, available at: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cli/handbook.pdf. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review and consider these guidance when making local planning and land use decisions. ' MND. PDF Page 21 of 92. South Coast Air Quality Management District. Accessed at: htp:1/www.aamd.2ovihomo permits/risk-assessment. s SCAQMD has developed the CEQA significance threshold of 10 in one million for cancer risk. When SCAQMD acts as the Lead Agency for its own project; or Responsible Agency for permit projects, SCAQMD staff' conducts a HRA, compares the maximum cancer risk to the threshold of 10 in one million to determine the level of significance for health risk impacts, and identifies mitigation measures if the risk is found to be significant. Health risks from operating a gasoline service station must be demonstrated to be below 10 in one million before a permit can be issued. 6 MND. PDF Page 21 of 92. r South Coast Air Quality Management District. May 2005. Guidance Document far Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Plaruuing. Accessed at: http:''wwwagmdeos 9tomelibrarv'dacum nts-support-mat•rial:plannine" euidance suidanee.d,)CLllpenl E1—E6 Pg 140 Ttnn Gralm 3 May 29, 2018 Recommended Change to Mitiga/ion Measure 1) CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures go beyond what is required by law to minimize any significant impacts. To further reduce criteria pollutant emissions, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following change to Mitigation Measure 1), which currently requires the use of construction equipment of 150 horsepower or greater to be CARB Tier 3 or better". SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use off-road diesel -powered construction equipment that meets or exceeds the CARB and USEPA Tier 4 off-road emissions standards for equipment rated at 50 horsepower or greater during Project construction. Such equipment will be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices including a CARB certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Level 3 DPFs are capable of achieving at least 85 percent reduction in in particulate matter emissions. A list of CARB verified DPFs are available on the CARB website 10. SCAQMD staffs recotmnended change to Mitigation Measure 1) is as follows. 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (> 450 50 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (GARB) Tier 3 4 certified or better. To ensure that Tier 4 construction equipment or better will be used during the construction phase of the Proposed Project, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency include this requirement in applicable bid documents and successful contractor(s) must demonstrate the ability to supply such equipment prior to issuance of a grading permitting and any demolition and ground disturbing activities. A copy of each units certified tier specification or model year specification and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit (if applicable) shall be available upon request at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. In the event that the Lead Agency finds that Tier 4 construction equipment is not feasible pursuant to C17QA Guidelines Section 15364, the Project representative or contractor(s) must demonstrate the infeasibility by facts supported by substantial evidence before using other technologies/strategies that must be approved by the Lead Agency prior to demolition and ground disturbing activities. Alternative applicable teclmologieststrategies may include, but would not be limited to, Tier 3 construction equipment, reduction in the number and. -or horsepower rating of construction equipment, limiting the number of daily construction haul truck trips to and from the Project, using cleaner vehicle fuel, and/or limiting the number of individual construction project phases occurring simultaneously. CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 An older version of CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2)' was used to quantify the Proposed Project's construction and operational emissions. Updates to CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) were available since October 2017. While revising the construction and operational emissions calculations, based on this comments, is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND, it is recommended that the Lead Agency use the latest version of CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) that has been available since the release and public circulation of the MND to quantify the Proposed Project's construction and operational emissions in the Final MND. Closine Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the Proposed Project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review s MND. PDF Page 22 of 92. 9 California Air Resources Board. November 16-17, 2004. Diesel Off --Road Equipment Measure —Workshop. Page 17. Accessed at: httns:!/%m%v arb ca eo_v/greet)rdiewl/nresentations'novl6-04 workshnn.nd F. 10 chid. Page 18. MND. Appendix A, CaiEE.tlod Ouuput E1—E6 Pg141 Tom Grahn May 29, 2018 process. Please provide the SCAQMD with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the certification of the Final MND. When responding to issues raised in the comments, response should provide sufficient details giving reasons why specific comments and suggestions are not accepted. There should be good faith, reasoned analysis in response. Conclusory statements unsupported by factual information do not facilitate the purpose and goal of CEQA on public disclosure and are not meaningful or useful to decision makers and to the public who are interested in the Proposed Project. SCAQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address any air quality questions that may arise from this comment letter. Please contact me at lsun(cDa mq d_gov if you have any questions. LS SBCI80508-04 Control Number Sincerely, ze#a sew Lijin Sun, J.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources E1—E6 Pg142 ACOUSTICS AZ Office CA Office � 6,2ra cr GU.rr.T I 4960 S. Gilbert Rd, Suite 1-461 1197 Los Angeles Ave, Suite C-256 MD iautt+5 ' �0-", Chandler, AZ 85249 Simi Valley, CA 93065 it. (602) 774-1950 p. (805) 426-4477 June 6, 2018 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JUN 0 6 2018 Mr. Benny Natanzi RECEIVED - PLANNING 8477 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Subject: 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Avenue Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study, City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA Response to Comments — Memo#1 Dear Mr. Natanzi: MD Acoustics, LLC (MD) has been working with the Team that has conducted the 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash project as it relates to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Study. The 8477 Archibald Air Quality and Greenliouse Gas Impact Study (AQ/GHG) was prepared by MIG in August 2016. On May 29, 2018, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (Tom Grahn) received comments from South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the proposed 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash project. Comment 1 Permits and Compliance with SCAQMDs Rules Since the Proposed Project involves gasoline service station, a permit from SCAQMD would be required, and SCAQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for this Project in the Final MND. Please note that any assumptions in the air quality analysis in the Final MND will be the basis for permit conditions and limits. The Final MND should also demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules, including, but are not limited to, Rule 201— Permit to Construct, Rule 203 — Permit to Operate, and Rule 461— Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing. If there are permitting questions concerning the gasoline service station, they can be directed to SCAQMD Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-2551. Response to Comment 1 As a condition of approval and prior to issuance to building permits, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance to Rule 201 — Permit to Construct and Rule 203 — Permit to Operate, and Rule 461 — Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing by obtaining proper permits. 1N:02681804 Memo#1 E1—E6 Pg143 1 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Cor Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments —Memo#1 Comment 2 Air Quality Analysis In the Air Quality analysis, the Lead Agency found that the Proposed Proiect's regional and localized construction and operational air quality impacts would be less than significant. However, it does not appear that the Air Quality analysis include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process. This may have likely led to an under -estimation of the Proposed Project's operational air quality impacts. It is important to note that while CaIEEMod quantifies mobile source emissions (e.g., trip visits by patrons) associated with operating a gasoline service station, CaIEEMod does not quantify the operational stationary source emissions from the storage tanks and fueling equipment. Therefore, it is recommended that the Lead Agency use its best efforts to quantify and disclose operational emissions from the fueling process in the Final MND. Response to Comment 2 The comment above states that "the Air Quality Analysis did not include emissions generated from the operation of the gasoline service station (CalEEMod does not quantify emissions from storage tanks or from the fueling process)". As shown in Appendix A of the AQ/GHG, the air quality impacts from both the construction and the operation of the gas station (part of the convenience market) were analyzed via the land use of Convenience Market With Gas Pumps, using the size and metric of 1.74 thousand square feet respectively. Emissions from the dispensing of gasoline from the gas pumps were not analyzed as the gas station is subject to SCAQMD permitting requirements (as detailed above) and SCAQMD Rule 461. Furthermore, according to the ARB's Attachment 1: Revised Emission Factors for Phase 11 Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities (12/23/2013), indicates that Phase II EVR (enhanced vapor recovery) systems have an average efficiency of 95.1% (Table II -3). The referenced document is located in Appendix A. According to the ARB's: Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Marketing Operations at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities (12/23/2013), indicates that Phase I EVR systems have an average efficiency of 98% (page 3. tad paragraph). The referenced document is located in Appendix B. As stated within the referenced ARB documents, both Phase I and Phase II EVR systems have a minimum 95.1% efficiency at capturing emissions. Emission inventory is based upon two (2) factors: 8.4 lbs of TOG per thousand gallons dispensed (lbs/kgal) and 0.74 lbs/kgal for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities with Phase II pre-EVR vapor recovery. These factors are based upon pre-EVR vapor recovery systems. Assuming a 95% vapor recovery rate, the majority of the emissions would be captured and the additional VOCs that would potentially escape these mandatory recovery systems is anticipated to be relatively small. To fully understand the emissions, the estimated number of gallons per year would need to be provided. Per Table 11 from the AQ/GHG report, the project's operational VOC emissions are 7.41 lbs/day. Even if an additional 7.41 lbs/day (the uncontrolled [no ORVR or phase II) vehicle fueling emission factor for each 1,000 gallons pumped) were added to the project's operational VOC emissions), the emissions would still be JN:02681804 Memottl E1—E6 Pg144 F4 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments —Memo#1 well below the SCAQMD's operational threshold of significance of 55 lbs per day for VOC. The vehicle fueling emissions factor with ORVR and Phase II EVR in place is 0.021 lbs per thousand gallons. Both ORVR and Phase II EVRs are required per regulation in California and the gas pumps at the project site would have to pump over a million gallons of fuel per day to exceed the daily VOC threshold. Therefore, no additional analysis or mitigation is required. Comment 3 Health Risk Assessment In the MND, the Lead Agency stated that an HRA analysis is not required for the Proposed Project because the Proposed Project does not include use of stationary emergency or prime compression ignition internal combustion engines, portable diesel engines or other equipment subject to AB2588. SCAQMD staff disagrees with the analysis. Enacted in 1987, AB2588 is an air toxics hot spots program and requires stationary sources to report the types and quantities of certain substances routinely released into the air. An AB2588 Air Toxics Hot Spot Health Risk Assessment (HRA) estimates potential health risks over a lifetime of exposure from air toxics for existing facilities (Emphasis added) pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 1402 and does not apply to new or planned facilities. Here, the Proposed Project is a new or planned gasoline service facility that is subject to the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1401, Therefore, AB2588 HRA should not be used as a screening tool to determine if a HRA analysis is warranted for the Proposed Project. Moreover, since the operation of gasoline stations will emit air toxics, HRAs are required as part of the SCAQMD permitting requirements for gasoline stations. Any assumptions used in the HRA analysis in the Final MND will be used as the basis for permit conditions and limits. Furthermore, the Proposed Project would be located in close proximity to existing sensitive receptors such as residents and children at the early education center, thereby warranting a HRA analysis. Benzene, which is a toxic air contaminant, may be emitted from the Proposed Project's gasoline refueling operations. Given SCAQMD staff's concern about the potential health impacts on the residents and children from being exposed to benzene, it is recommended that the Lead Agency evaluate, quantify, and perform a gasoline dispensing station HRA for the Proposed Project in the Final MND. Guidance for performing this HRA can be found in the SCAQMD's Emission Inventory and Risk Assessment Guidelines for Gasoline Dispensing Stations. Response to Comment 3 No gas station analysis was warranted as the closest sensitive receptor (northern property line) to the fuel pumps (or even the gas station canopy)'is over 61 feet (18 meters) and the storage tanks are 91 feet from any source of potential gasoline or diesel fumes. Furthermore, the early education center building facade (location where the nearest sensitive receptors, reside) is located 240 feet from the canopy and 275 feet from the storage tanks (See attached PDF of 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash overlaid on Google Earth (see Appendix C). Section 6.4.1 of the technical air quality and greenhouse study qualitatively evaluates the toxic air contaminants for the proposed project. This response further quantifies the emissions based on JN:02681804 Memo#1 E1—E6 Pg145 3 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memo#1 estimated number of gallons per year at the proposed project. The project proposes to sale approximately 1.68 million gallons per year. By SCAQMD's own admission in their comment above, GARB (and CAPCOA) recommend a 50 -foot separation between gas stations and sensitive receptors; therefore, the 61 foot separation from the canopy and 91 feet from the underground tanks should be more than adequate. Furthermore, the attached (Appendix D) SCAQMD gasoline station HRA screening tables show that the MICR at residential receptors 25 meters from the fuel source (underground tanks) for a typical gas station would have 3.108 in a million for 1 million gallons of fuel. As previously mentioned, the project is proposing 1.68 million gallons of throughput a year which would equate to an MCIR of 5.22 in a million; (which is a reasonable assumption given the size of the project and number of pumps). The MICR threshold is 10 in one million. As shown quantitatively, the project would not exceed the MICR 10 in one million. Comment 4 Guidance Regarding Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Sited Near Sensitive Receptors SCAQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions. To facilitate stronger collaboration between Lead Agencies and SCAQMD to reduce community exposure to source -specific and cumulative air pollution impacts, SCAQMD adopted the Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning in 2005. Additional guidance is available in the California Air Resources Board (GARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective, available at: https://www/arb/ca/eov/ch/handbook.pdf. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency review and consider these guidance when making local planning and land use decisions. Response to Comment 4 There is at least a 61 to 91 -foot separation between the gas station and storage tanks and the closest sensitive receptor. See response to Comment 3 above. Comment 5 Recommended Change to Mitigation Measure I) CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures go beyond what is required by law to minimize any significant impacts. To further reduce criteria pollutant emissions, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency incorporate the following change to Mitigation Measure 1), which currently requires the use of construction equipment of 150 horsepower or greater to be CARB Tier 3 or better. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use off-road diesel -powered construction equipment that meets or exceeds the CARB and USEPA Tier 4 off-road emissions standards for equipment rated at 50 horsepower or greater during Project construction. Such equipment will be outfitted with Best Available Control Technology (BACT) devices including a CARB certified Level 3 Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF). Level 3 DPFs are capable of achieving at least 85 percent reduction in in particulate matter JN:02681804 Memo#1 E1—E6 Pg 146 4 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memo#1 emissions. A list of CARB verified DPFs are available on the CARB website. SCAQMD staffs recommended change to Mitigation Measure 1) is as follows. 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (>: 150 50 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 4 certified or better. To ensure that Tier 4 construction equipment or better will be used during the construction phase of the Proposed Project, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency include this requirement in applicable bid documents and successful contractor(s) must demonstrate the ability to supply such equipment prior to issuance of a grading permitting and any demolition and ground disturbing activities. A copy of each unit's certified tier specification or model year specification and CARB or SCAQMD operating permit (if applicable) shall be available upon request at the time of mobilization of each applicable unit of equipment. In the event that the Lead Agency finds that Tier 4 construction equipment is not feasible pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15364, the Project representative or contractor(s) must demonstrate the infeasibility by facts supported by substantial evidence before using other technologies/strategies that must be approved by the Lead Agency prior to demolition and ground disturbing activities. Alternative applicable technologies/strategies may include, but would not be limited to, Tier 3 construction equipment, reduction in the number and/or horsepower rating of construction equipment, limiting the number of daily construction haul truck trips to and from the Project, using cleaner vehicle fuel, and/or limiting the number of individual construction project phases occurring simultaneously. Response to Comment 5 The technical air quality and greenhouse gas study shows that even without the implementation of the Tier 3 (or Tier 4) equipment, the emissions are below SCAQMD's thresholds of significance at the regional and localized level. The modeling evaluated the project using Tier 0 and which shows that the project complies with the thresholds of significance. The IS -MND implemented a mitigation measure during grading (Tier 3 equipment) that goes above and beyond what is necessary to meet SCAQMD's thresholds of significance during construction. As shown within the technical air quality and greenhouse gas study the mitigation measure goes above and beyond what is required. Therefore, the mitigation measure 1 is sufficient or not required at all. Comment 6 CoIEEMod Verison 2016.3.2 An older version of CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) was used_ to quantify the Proposed Project's construction and operational emissions. Updates to CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) were available since October 2017. While revising the construction and operational emissions calculations, based on this comments, is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND, it is recommended that the Lead Agency use the latest version of CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) that has been available JN:02681804 Memokl E1—E6Pg147 5 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memo#1 since the release and public circulation of the MND to quantify the Proposed Project's construction and operational emissions in the Final MND. Response to Comment 6 During the time when the technical air quality and greenhouse gas study was performed only the older version of CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) was publicly available. Furthermore, by SCAQMD's own admission, "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations, based on this comments, is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND", will not change the findings of significance. Therefore, the CalEEMod modeling as conducted is sufficient at determining the project's emissions. MD is pleased to provide this response to comments (Memotll) to SCAQMD's comments. If you have any questions call our office at (805) 426-4477. Sincerely, MD Acoustics, LLC Wa-��kt-lv� Mike Dickerson, INCE Principal JN:02681804 Memo#1 E1—E6 Pg148 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Cor Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memo#1 JN:02681804 Memo#1 AppendixA Revised Emission Factors for Phase II Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities E1—E6 Pg 149 Monitoring and Laboratory Division Attachment 1: Revised Emission Factors for Phase II Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities December 23, 2013 This report has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. E1 -E6 Pg 150 Table of Contents Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. METHODOLOGY - REVISED VEHICLE REFUELING 2 EMISSION FACTORS III. REFERENCES 8 List of Tables Table 1-1: Current and Revised Vehicle Refueling Emission Factors 1 Table 1-2: Percent Gasoline Dispensed to ORVR Vehicles in California 2 Table 11-1: Vapor Recovery Emission Test Results for Summer RVP Fuel 4 Vehicle Fueling UEF Table II -2: Vapor Recovery Emission Test Results for Winter RVP Fuel 4 Vehicle Fueling UEF Table 11-3: Phase 11 EVR In -use Efficiency Test Results 6 E1—E6 Pg151 IF,II It•stf*TSk Vehicle fueling emissions occur when gasoline vapors are displaced by rising liquid in the vehicle fuel tank during gasoline dispensing. These vapors are adsorbed in a carbon canister installed on vehicles equipped with an on board refueling vapor recovery system (ORVR). When fueling non-ORVR vehicles, these vapors can be collected by a Phase II vapor recovery system and returned to the gasoline dispensing facility (GDF) storage tank. Without a Phase II vapor recovery system, the vapors displaced from fueling non-ORVR vehicles are uncontrolled and released to the atmosphere. The current Air Resources Board (ARB) total organic gases (TOG) emission factors for GDFs, in use since May 1999, do not reflect improvements in Phase II vapor recovery system performance achieved by ARB's enhanced vapor recovery (EVR) program or the widespread penetration of ORVR in the vehicle fleet. Therefore, the current GDF emission factors for uncontrolled and controlled gasoline dispensing are representative of non-ORVR vehicles only. ARB staff has conducted field tests, literature research, and data analyses to account for these advances, resulting in the proposed revisions to the vehicle fueling emission factors presented in Table 1-1 below. Table 1-1 Current and Revised Vehicle Fueling Emission Factors lbs/kgal Category Emission Factors Current Revised Uncontrolled Emission Factor (No ORVR, No Phase II) 8.4 8.4 ORVR without Phase 11 NA 0.42 ORVR with Phase II pre-EVR NA 0.12 ORVR with Phase II EVR NA 0.021 No ORVR with Phase II pre-EVR 0.74 2.4 No ORVR with Phase I I EVR NA 0.42 As shown in Table 1-1, ARB's current vehicle fueling emissions inventory is based on two emission factors: 8.4 pounds of TOG per thousand gallons dispensed (lbs/kgal) for GDFs with uncontrolled vehicle fueling and 0.74 lbs/kgal for GDFs with Phase II pre- EVR vapor recovery. ARB's test results suggest that the uncontrolled emission factor (UEF) remains unchanged, but new or revised emission factors are needed to account for various levels of control efficiency resulting from different combinations of Phase II vapor recovery systems and ORVR technology, as well as improved Phase II vapor recovery system performance from implementation of ARB's EVR program. E1—E6 Pg152 ARB estimates that approximately 74 percent of the gasoline sold in California in 2013 will be dispensed to ORVR vehicles. With the current regulatory requirements for Phase II vapor recovery systems remaining in place, there will be a continuing decline in vehicle fueling emissions as the volume of fuel dispensed to ORVR vehicles increases. Table 1-2 projects the gasoline fraction expected to be dispensed statewide to ORVR vehicles in calendar years 2013 through 2028 based on ARB's model for on -road mobile sources (EMFAC2011). 11. METHODOLOGY - REVISED VEHICLE FUELING EMISSION FACTORS The method used to develop the revised vehicle fueling emission factors consists of determining an uncontrolled vehicle fueling emission factor (UEF) and then applying control efficiency (CE) factors that are representative of each possible combination of vapor recovery control technologies. For example, the combined CE when both ORVR and Phase II vapor recovery systems are in use is calculated as: ORVR with Phase II = 1 - (1 - ORVR CE) * (1 - Phase II CE) DETERMINATION OF UEF Vehicle Fueling UEF The vehicle fueling UEF was determined from field data collected by ARB staff during various Phase II vapor recovery system efficiency tests. The tests were performed using the equipment and procedures specified in the version of ARB Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP -201.2, Efficiency and Emission Factor for Phase 11 Systems in effect at the time each test was performed. 2 E1—E6 Pg153 Table 1-2 Percent Gasoline Dispensed to ORVR Vehicles in California Calendar Year Gasoline Dispensed to ORVR Vehicles Calendar Year Gasoline Dispensed to ORVR Vehicles %) 2013 74 2021 88 2014 76 2022 88 2015 78 2023 89 2016 80 2024 90 2017 82 2025 91 2018 83 2026 91 2019 85 2027 92 2020 1 87 2028 93 11. METHODOLOGY - REVISED VEHICLE FUELING EMISSION FACTORS The method used to develop the revised vehicle fueling emission factors consists of determining an uncontrolled vehicle fueling emission factor (UEF) and then applying control efficiency (CE) factors that are representative of each possible combination of vapor recovery control technologies. For example, the combined CE when both ORVR and Phase II vapor recovery systems are in use is calculated as: ORVR with Phase II = 1 - (1 - ORVR CE) * (1 - Phase II CE) DETERMINATION OF UEF Vehicle Fueling UEF The vehicle fueling UEF was determined from field data collected by ARB staff during various Phase II vapor recovery system efficiency tests. The tests were performed using the equipment and procedures specified in the version of ARB Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP -201.2, Efficiency and Emission Factor for Phase 11 Systems in effect at the time each test was performed. 2 E1—E6 Pg153 All fueling events used for the determination of the UEF were conducted on non-ORVR vehicles. To minimize any bias introduced by the fueling of ORVR vehicles, only data from non-ORVR vehicles for which the preceding test vehicle was also a non-ORVR vehicle were used. (This was necessary because fueling an ORVR vehicle reduces the vapor concentration at the vapor return line sampling location, which causes a low bias in the vapor return mass for a subsequent fueling, even of a non-ORVR vehicle.) Data used to calculate the vehicle fueling UEF are presented in Table II -1 and Table II -2. Table II -1 summarizes data from eight tests used to calculate the vehicle fueling UEF for summer RVP fuel. Seven tests consisted of Phase II vapor recovery system efficiency tests in which 6,350 gallons of gasoline were dispensed to non-ORVR vehicles. The remaining test was an uncontrolled vehicle fueling emissions test in which 62 gallons of gasoline were dispensed to six non-ORVR vehicles at a GDF without Phase II vapor recovery. The average vehicle fueling UEF for summer RVP fuel determined from the eight tests is 7.65 lbs/kgal. Table II -2 summarizes data from the three tests used to calculate the vehicle fueling UEF for winter RVP fuel. In the first test, 1065 gallons of gasoline were dispensed to 101 non-ORVR vehicles at a GDF equipped with a Phase II vapor recovery system. The second test was an uncontrolled vehicle fueling emissions test performed by dispensing 460 gallons of gasoline to 41 non-ORVR vehicles at a GDF with a disabled Phase II vapor recovery system. The third test was an uncontrolled vehicle fueling emissions test performed by dispensing 116 gallons of gasoline to 10 non-ORVR vehicles at a GDF without Phase II vapor recovery. The average vehicle fueling UEF for winter RVP fuel determined from the three tests is 9.50 lbs/kgal. The annual vehicle fueling UEF is calculated by weighting the average summer and winter RVP fuel UEFs for statewide gasoline throughput during the respective summer and winter periods. The California State Board of Equalization (BOE) reported approximately 14.51 billion gallons of gasoline were dispensed statewide to motor vehicles in 2012.' Of the total, approximately 8.59 billion gallons, or 59.2 percent, of gasoline was dispensed during the April through October summer RVP fuel period. The remaining 5.92 billion gallons, or 40.8 percent, was dispensed during the January through March and November through December winter RVP fuel periods. Based on the BOE throughput data, the vehicle fueling UEF, weighted for seasonal variation in statewide gasoline throughput, is calculated using the following equation: Vehicle Fueling UEF = Summer Fuel UEF" (59.2%) + Winter Fuel UEF'(40.8%) = 7.65 lbs/kgal`(0.592) + 9.50 lbs/kgal*(0.408) = 8.4 lbs/kgal Based on ARB test results, the average annual vehicle fueling UEF is 8.4 lbs/kgal, which equals the UEF estimated in the previous methodology. 3 E1—E6 Pg154 Note: 2000 ISOR – Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the Vapor Recovery Certification and Test Procedures for Gasoline Loading and Motor Vehicle Refueling at Service Stations Table V-11, page 93. Table li-1 Vapor Recovery Emission Test Results for Summer RVP Fuel Vehicle Fueling UEF Vapor Recovery System Purpose of_ Test Location Date File Number Number of Fuelings Gallons Dispensed Vapor Mass (lbsx1000) UEF (lbs/kgal) Hirt Certification Sacramento Apr 1996 2000 ISOR 100 679 4535 6.68 Catlow Certification Sacramento Sep 1996 2000 ISOR 100 842 6732 8.00 Healy Certification Sacramento Se p 1996 2000 ISOR 100 939 6914 7.36 Hasstech I Certification I Sacramento Aug 1997 1 2000 ISOR 100 1012 9509 9.40 Healy Certification Sacramento Jun 1998 2000 ISOR 100 886 5712 6.45 Saber Certification Sacramento Apr 1999 2000 ISOR 100 981 6465 6.59 OPW Certification Sacramento Jul 1999 2000 ISOR 100 1012 8836 8.73 No Phase II Research San Jose July 2007 ST -08-12 6 61.6 354.4 5.75 Overall Summer RVP Fuel Results: 6412.6 49057 7.65 Note: 2000 ISOR – Initial Statement of Reasons for Proposed Amendments to the Vapor Recovery Certification and Test Procedures for Gasoline Loading and Motor Vehicle Refueling at Service Stations Table V-11, page 93. Note: VOC Testing – Phase II vapor recovery efficiency test performed by VOC Testing, an ARB certified independent tester. S Table II -2 Vapor Recovery Emission Test Results for Winter RVP Fuel Vehicle Fueling UEF Vapor Purpose of Number of Gallons Vapor UEF Recovery Test Location Date File Number Fuelings Dispensed Mass (lbs/kgal) Ibsx1000 —System Healy Certification Folsom Nov 1997 VOC Testing 101 1065.3 10091.5 9.47 Disabled Research Sacramento Dec 1999 ST -99-50 41 459.7 4438.4 9.65 No Phase I I Research San Jose Dec 2007 ST -08-13 10 115.8 1065.6 9.20 Overall Winter RVP Fuel Results: 1640.8 15595.5 9.50 Note: VOC Testing – Phase II vapor recovery efficiency test performed by VOC Testing, an ARB certified independent tester. S DETERMINIATION OF CE ORVR CE The revised vehicle fueling emission factors assume 95 percent in -use CE for ORVR systems, based on the ORVR certification performance standard of 95 percent. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) test data suggests greater than 95 percent in -use CE for ORVR system s.2 3 However, U.S. EPA tests were performed on ORVR vehicles less than three model years old. Because data on longer-term efficiency of ORVR systems were not presented, ARB staff determined that the 95 percent certification performance standard represents the most conservative in -use CE for ORVR vehicles. Phase II Pre-EVR CE The revised vehicle refueling emission factors assume 71 percent in -use CE for Phase II pre-EVR systems, based primarily on results from a study conducted in 2000 by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) and data provided by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Phase II pre-EVR systems are required to achieve at least 95 percent efficiency during certification testing. However, the SDCAPCD study found that in -use Phase II pre-EVR balance systems were prone to malfunctions (e.g., hose blockages, nozzle faceplate gaps, and dispenser leaks) that resulted in a lower in -use control efficiency of approximately 70 percent, with 11 percent of the nozzles experiencing full system failure 4 Data provided by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) shows that, as of 2006 (prior to the upgrade to Phase II EVR) about 92 percent of Phase II pre- EVR systems were balance systems and 8 percent were assist system S.5 To calculate the in -use CE of assist systems, ARB staff assumed that assist nozzles experience complete failure at the same rate (11 percent) reported for balance systems in the SDCAPCD report referenced above. However, assist systems, based on the way they operate are not expected to experience partial failures as reported for balance systems. Therefore, 11 percent of Phase II pre-EVR assist systems were assumed to have 0 percent efficiency due to an equipment failure such as a failed vapor pump, or a complete blockage in the vapor return line. The efficiency of the remaining 89 percent of assist systems was assumed to be 95 percent. Based on the SDCAPCD and SCAQMD data, and the stated assumptions for Phase II pre-EVR assist systems, the Phase li pre-EVR CE is calculated using the following equation: Phase II Pre-EVR CE = 0.92 * (Balance CE) + 0.08 (0.89 * Assist CE) =0.92*70%+0.08*0.89*95%=71% Phase II EVR CE The revised vehicle fueling emission factors assume 95 percent in -use CE for Phase II EVR systems, based on both the certification performance standard of 95 percent and the results from thirteen separate in -use efficiency tests of Phase II EVR assist systems. Approximately 70 percent of Phase II EVR systems installed at California GDFs are 5 E1—E6 Pg156 assist systems. Phase II EVR in -use efficiency data was collected using the equipment and procedures referenced in the version of ARB Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP - 201.2, Efficiency and Emission Factor for Phase 11 Systems, in effect at the time each test was performed. The thirteen efficiency tests represent 221 non-ORVR vehicle fueling events. Table II -3 summarizes results from the thirteen in -use efficiency tests of Phase II EVR assist Systems. The tests determined an average in -use efficiency of 95.1 percent for 221 non-ORVR fueling events. In addition, GDFs with Phase II EVR and throughputs above 600,000 gallons per year are required to install ARB certified in -station diagnostic (ISD) systems designed to alert GDF operators when critical parameters that affect efficiency do not comply with ISD performance criteria. If the operator ignores ISD warning alarms, ISD will suspend fueling. This requirement helps ensure a high level of emissions control for Phase II EVR systems and supports the assumption of a 95 percent overall CE. DETERMINATION OF EMISSION FACTORS ORVR without Phase II Vapor Recovery Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling ORVR vehicles at GDFs without Phase II vapor recovery systems is calculated from the UEF and ORVR CE using the following equation: E1—E6 Pg157 Table II -3 Phase II EVR In -Use Efficie cy Test Results Test Site Date Non-ORVR Vehicle Fueling Events Phase II EVR Efficiency Arco Fruitridge 12/15/2008 13 93.2% Arco Fruitridge 12/16/2008 15 91.2% Arco Fruitridge 12/17/2008 16 91.0% Arco Fruitridge 12/17/2008 11 97.2% Arco Northgate 1/5/2009 15 91.7% Arco Northgate 1/6/2009 15 95.8% Arco Northgate 1/6/2009 15 97.8% Arco Northgate 1/8/2009 15 98.5% Arco Northgate 1/8/2009 16 95.2% Arco North 1/26/2010 25 94.2% Arco Harbour 3/9/2010 22 98.2% Arco North 7/12/2010 21 95.8% Arco Harbour 9/27/2010 22 96.8% Total Test Events: 221 Average Efficiency: 95.1% DETERMINATION OF EMISSION FACTORS ORVR without Phase II Vapor Recovery Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling ORVR vehicles at GDFs without Phase II vapor recovery systems is calculated from the UEF and ORVR CE using the following equation: E1—E6 Pg157 ORVR w/o Phase II = UEF * (1 - ORVR CE) = 8.4 lbs/kgal * (1 - 0.95) = 0.42 lbs/kgal ORVR with Phase II ore-EVR Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling ORVR vehicles at GDFs with Phase II pre-EVR systems is calculated from the UEF, ORVR CE, and Phase II pre-EVR CE using the following equation: ORVR w/ Phase II EVR = UEF * (1 - ORVR CE) * (1 Phase II pre-EVR CE) = 8.4 lbs/kgal * (1 - 0.95) * (1 - 0.71) = 0.12 lbs/kgal ORVR with Phase II EVR Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling ORVR vehicles at GDFs with Phase II EVR systems is calculated from the UEF, ORVR CE, and Phase II EVR CE using the following equation: ORVR w/ Phase II EVR = UEF * (1 - ORVR CE) * (1 - Phase II EVR CE) = 8.4 lbs/kgal * (1 - 0.95) * (1 - 0.95) = 0.021 lbs/kgal Non-ORVR with Phase II ore-EVR Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling non-ORVR vehicles at GDFs with Phase II pre- EVR systems is calculated from the UEF and Phase II pre-EVR CE using the following equation: Non-ORVR w/ Phase II pre-EVR = UEF * (1 - Phase II pre-EVR CE) = 8.4 lbs/kgal * (1 - 0.71) = 2.4 lbs/kgal Non-ORVR with Phase II EVR Emission Factor The revised emission factor for fueling non-ORVR vehicles at GDFs with Phase II EVR systems is calculated from the UEF and Phase II EVR CE using the following equation: Non-ORVR w/ Phase II EVR = UEF * (1 - Phase EVR II CE) = 8.4 lbs/kgal * (1 - 0.95) = 0.42 lbs/kgal E1—E6 Pg158 III. REFERENCES 1. California State Board of Equalization Fuel Taxes and Statistics Report -2012. http://www.boe.ca.gov/sotaxprog/spftrptsl2.htm 2. SHED test data for 337 2004-2005 model vehicles is available from David Good, U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Compliance Information Systems. NESCAUM Report - Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery Systems Analysis of Widespread Use, pages 9-10, Skelton and Rector, 8/20/2007. 4. Barnard R. McEntire, Performance of Balance Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, San Diego Air Pollution Control District, May 18, 2000. 5. Data on 2006 Balance/Assist Split for Pre-EVR systems provided to Frances Cameron by South Coast Air Quality Management District Staff 0 E1 -E6 Pg159 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memo#1 IN:02681804 Memo#1 Appendix B Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Marketing Operations at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities E1 -E6 Pg160 Environmental Protection AIR RESOURCES BOARD Monitoring and Laboratory Division Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Marketing Operations at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities December 23, 2013 This report has been reviewed by the staff of the California Air Resources Board and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources Board, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. E1 -E6 Pg 161 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to acknowledge the contributions by Gurjeet Bains, Frances Cameron, Basharat Iqbal, John Marconi, Jason McPhee and Frederick Medina, of the Air Resources Board Monitoring and Laboratory Division, in developing the emission factors presented in this proposal. In addition, thanks to Manjit Ahuja, Ranjit Bhullar, Cynthia Castronovo and George Lew for their editorial and technical review of the draft document. The author also wishes to give special acknowledgement to Gabriel Ruiz of the Air Resources Board Air Quality Planning and Science Division for his significant contributions in the review and editing of the draft emission factor document. E1—E6 Pg162 Table of Contents List of Tables Table 1-I: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline Page I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 IL INTRODUCTION 3 III. PHASE II FUELING - NON-ORVR AND ORVR VEHICLES - 5 IV. PHASE I BULK TRANSFER LOSSES 7 V. PRESSURE DRIVEN LOSSES 9 VI. PHASE II FUELING — SPILLAGE 10 VII. GASOLINE DISPENSING HOSE PERMEATION 11 VIII. CONCLUSIONS 13 IX. REFERENCES 15 List of Tables Table 1-I: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline 2 Dispensing Facilities Table III -I: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Vehicle 6 Refueling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Table IV -I: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Phase 1 8 Transfer Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Table V -I: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Pressure 9 Driven Emissions from Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Table VI -I: Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline 11 Spillage at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Table VII -I: Year 2013 and 2017 Hose Permeation TOG Emission Factors 13 for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities E1—E6 Pg163 Table of Contents (cont.) List of Figures Figure II -I: Phase I, Phase II and Onboard Vapor Recovery Systems 3 Figure VII -I: Cutaways of Vapor Recovery GDF Hose Assemblies Showing 12 Vapor and Liquid Paths Attachments Attachment 1: Revised Emission Factors for Phase II Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 2: Revised Emission Factors for Phase I Gasoline Bulk Transfer at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 3: Revised Emission Factors for Pressure Driven Emissions at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 4: Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Spillage at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 5: Proposed Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities E1—E6 Pg164 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Gasoline marketing operations in California presently distribute approximately 15 billion gallons of gasoline per year' to motor vehicles, fuel containers, and gasoline -powered equipment. Hydrocarbon emissions, which are ozone precursors, can occur at several points during transfer, storage, or vehicle refueling as gasoline vapors are displaced from underground storage tanks (UST) or from vehicle fuel tanks. Vapor recovery systems are used to control emissions from California gasoline dispensing facilities (GDF). Phase I vapor recovery systems collect vapors displaced from an UST when a cargo tank truck delivers gasoline to a GDF. Phase II vapor recovery systems collect vapors displaced during storage or dispensing of gasoline. The Phase 1 and Phase II systems at a GDF work in combination with vapor recovery systems in vehicles and at gasoline loading terminals to control approximately 370 tons per day of hydrocarbon emission S2 from California gasoline marketing operations. The Air Resources Board (ARB) is in the process of updating the emissions inventory for GDFs. This category is currently composed of four subcategories associated with gasoline storage and transfer operations from cargo tank trucks to GDFs and from GDFs to vehicles, fuel containers, and gasoline -powered equipment. Total organic gas (TOG) emission factors for the four current GDF marketing subcategories were adopted in May 1999 and do not account for advances in vapor recovery system performance achieved through implementation of ARB's enhanced vapor recovery (EVR) program; nor do they reflect the interaction between vapor recovery systems installed at California GDFs and vehicles equipped with onboard refueling vapor recovery (ORVR). Approximately 74 percent of gasoline dispensed statewide in 2013 will be to ORVR vehicles. Therefore, the purpose of this document is to present revised emission factors for four current gasoline marketing subcategories and two new subcategories developed since 1999. Current subcategories: i. Phase II Fueling - Non-ORVR Vehicles ii. Phase I Transfer Losses iii. Pressure Driven Losses iv. Phase II Fueling - Spillage New subcategories: V. Phase II Fueling - ORVR Vehicles vi. Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation This document describes the methodologies used to develop new or revised emission factors for the six GDF subcategories. The revised TOG emission factors are presented in Table 1-I, along with the emission factors currently in use. The emission factors are segregated into three tiers, each representing varying degrees of vapor recovery equipment control: no vapor recovery system, or uncontrolled emission factor (LIEF); E1—E6 Pg165 Phase I and Phase II vapor recovery systems predating enhanced vapor recovery (Pre- EVR); and enhanced Phase I and Phase II vapor recovery systems (EVR). Table 1-1 Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Sub Category Currenta (lbs/kgal)b Revised (lbs/kgal)b UEF Pre-EVR UEF Pre-EVR EVR Phase II Fueling��1su,kt rpde 7 G3t"ft f g yty�ry i I{dh'] @1xv F's "04; .a41 Non-ORVR Vehicles 8.4 0.74 8.4 2.4 0.42 ORVR Vehicles NA NA 0.42 0.12 0.021 Phased Bulk Transfer Losses 8.4 0.42 7.7 0.38 0.15 Pressure Driven Losses 0.84 0.1 0.76 0.092 0.024 Phase II Fueling - Spillage 0.64 0.42 0.61 0.42 0.24 Gasoline Dispensing Hose P 9-fFAue�,,,ssss Permeation Ni °�� iiC a wlt � Ci��Pfi S l � 3� Sw"Ei: 1 rff (�7t] 47fs1 �,.e �..i :3846' ✓ Year 2013 NA NA 0.062 0.062 0.062 Year 2017' NA NA 0.009 0.009 0.009 Notes: a Current emission factors adopted May 1999, and predate EVR. b Pounds TOG emitted per thousand gallons dispensed or transferred. UEF - Uncontrolled emission factor. No Phase I vapor recovery system for bulk transfer emissions, no Phase II vapor recovery system for all other subcategories. Pre-EVR - Phase I pre-EVR system for bulk transfer emissions, Phase II pre-EVR system for all other subcategories. EVR - Phase I EVR system for bulk transfer emissions, Phase II EVR system for all other subcategories. NA - No current applicable emission factor. E1—E6 Pg 166 II. INTRODUCTION: Vapor recovery systems are installed at GDFs to collect gasoline vapors that would otherwise escape into the atmosphere. Gasoline vapor emissions at GDFs are controlled in two phases. Phase I vapor recovery collects vapors displaced from an UST when a cargo tank truck delivers gasoline to a GDF. Phase II vapor recovery collects vapors displaced during the transfer of gasoline from a GDF to a vehicle, fuel container, or gasoline -powered equipment; and the storage of gasoline at a GDF. ARB regulations establish standards for the level of emissions control vapor recovery systems must achieve during the transfer and storage of gasoline. All vapor recovery systems must undergo certification tests to demonstrate compliance with performance standards before they can be sold, offered for sale, or installed in California. Figure II -1 illustrates the interaction between Phase I, Phase II and onboard vapor recovery systems. Figure II -I: Phase I, Phase II and Onboard Vapor Recovery Systems ORVP. �n:nunpio• c.,ae,:e i ! (P.dm'b UST Vapor recovery system performance standards for GDFs have become more stringent over the years. Since 2001, ARB has adopted a number of significant advancements as part of the EVR program. Phase I EVR requires more durable and leak -tight components, along with an increased collection efficiency of 98 percent. Phase II EVR includes three major advancements: (1) dispensing nozzles with less spillage and required compatibility with ORVR vehicles, (2) a processor to control the static pressure of the ullage, or vapor space, in the underground storage tank, and (3) an in -station diagnostic (ISD) system that provides warning alarms to alert a GDF operator of potential vapor recovery system malfunctions. Phase I EVR was fully implemented in 2005. Phase II EVR was fully implemented between 2009 and 2011. Only existing GDFs in areas that are designated attainment for the State ozone standard are exempt from Phase I and Phase II EVR requirements. Additionally, ARB's air toxic control measure for benzene requires retail GDFs to install Phase I 3 E1—E6 Pg167 PHASE U_.1 PHASEI Fi•,:m.Ya:vvu�hl/. E'.P. Fhv�e 11 11e__I: I 77 V�pm � F,aIu�ILm.h•, Palm i :trpemat Svcme,pJFM Lin, I Ppe \ i rr:Ls'_::� ORVP. �n:nunpio• c.,ae,:e i ! (P.dm'b UST Vapor recovery system performance standards for GDFs have become more stringent over the years. Since 2001, ARB has adopted a number of significant advancements as part of the EVR program. Phase I EVR requires more durable and leak -tight components, along with an increased collection efficiency of 98 percent. Phase II EVR includes three major advancements: (1) dispensing nozzles with less spillage and required compatibility with ORVR vehicles, (2) a processor to control the static pressure of the ullage, or vapor space, in the underground storage tank, and (3) an in -station diagnostic (ISD) system that provides warning alarms to alert a GDF operator of potential vapor recovery system malfunctions. Phase I EVR was fully implemented in 2005. Phase II EVR was fully implemented between 2009 and 2011. Only existing GDFs in areas that are designated attainment for the State ozone standard are exempt from Phase I and Phase II EVR requirements. Additionally, ARB's air toxic control measure for benzene requires retail GDFs to install Phase I 3 E1—E6 Pg167 and Phase II systems at all GDFs except those which: (1) dispense from or transfer gasoline to a storage tank with a capacity less than 260 gallons, (2) dispense gasoline to implements of animal husbandry; or (3) only dispense to vehicles with fuel tanks less than 5 gallons capacity. The current emission inventory category for gasoline marketing and retailing consists of four subcategories that include processes associated with storage and fuel transfer operations from cargo tank trucks to GDFs and from GDFs to vehicles, fuel containers, and gasoline -powered equipment. The current emission factors have been in effect since May 1999 and do not account for advances in vapor recovery system performance achieved through implementation of ARB's EVR program; nor do they address the interaction between GDF vapor recovery systems and ORVR vehicles. This document presents updated emission factors for the four current subcategories, and two new subcategories addressing ORVR vehicle refueling and gasoline dispensing hose permeation emissions. The processes that generate emissions in the six subcategories are described below: Current subcategories: Phase II Fueling - Non-ORVR Vehicles: When dispensing gasoline to vehicles not equipped with ORVR, the rising liquid level in the vehicle fuel tank displaces gasoline vapors back through the fill -pipe where they are captured by a Phase II vapor recovery system. Vapors not captured by the Phase II vapor recovery system are emitted to the atmosphere. Phase I Bulk Transfer Losses: During transfer of gasoline from cargo tank trucks to a GDF UST, emissions are generated when gasoline vapors in an UST are displaced to the atmosphere by the rising level of the gasoline being loaded into an UST. Emissions are controlled with a Phase I vapor recovery system. iii. Pressure Driven (Breathing) Losses: Emissions are generated when gasoline vapors are displaced to the atmosphere during the day to day operation of a given GDF. During periods when there is either no dispensing or when there is a significant slowdown in the dispensing of fuel to vehicles, such as overnight periods, gasoline in an UST evaporates into the headspace above the liquid fuel. The vapor growth caused by this evaporation increases UST static pressure and results in pressure driven emissions. Pressure driven emissions are currently controlled by a processing unit that includes either a bladder tank, membrane separator, carbon canister or thermal oxidizer. iv. Phase II Fueling - Spillage: Emissions are generated from dispensing nozzle spillage of liquid gasoline during the act of vehicle fueling, including pre - fueling, fueling and post -fueling spillage. E1—E6 Pg168 New subcategories: V. Phase II Fueling - ORVR Vehicles: These emissions occur at the vehicle fill - pipe during dispensing of gasoline to ORVR vehicles. ORVR systems were phased in beginning with 1998 model year passenger vehicles, and are now installed on all passenger, light-duty, and medium -duty vehicles manufactured since the 2006 model year. When an ORVR vehicle is fueled, almost all the gasoline vapor displaced from the fuel tank is routed to a carbon canister in the vehicle fuel system. At the start of dispensing, a small portion of the vapor in the vehicle fuel tank may escape through the fill -pipe before the onboard system is fully engaged. Uncontrolled fill -pipe emissions from ORVR vehicles are approximately two orders of magnitude lower than the same emissions from vehicles without ORVR, and are easily captured by Phase II vapor recovery systems. vi. Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation: These emissions are caused by the migration of liquid gasoline through the outer GDF hose material and to the atmosphere through permeation. This condition primarily occurs at GDFs equipped with vacuum assist Phase II vapor recovery systems or no Phase II vapor recovery system. The following sections present new or revised emission factors for the four current and two new subcategories identified above. The GDF emission factors are segregated into three tiers, each representing varying degrees of vapor recovery control equipment: uncontrolled (UEF), pre-EVR, and EVR. This document also includes attachments detailing the methodologies and identifying references used to derive the revised emission factors for each GDF subcategory. All revised emission factors are based on test data collected by ARB staff, using established ARB test procedures when applicable. III. PHASE II FUELING - NON-ORVR AND ORVR VEHICLES Vehicle fueling emissions occur when gasoline vapors are displaced by rising liquid in the vehicle fuel tank during gasoline dispensing. These vapors are adsorbed in a carbon canister installed on ORVR vehicles. When fueling non-ORVR vehicles, these vapors can be collected by a Phase II vapor recovery system and returned to a GDF storage tank. Without a Phase II vapor recovery system, the vapors displaced from fueling non-ORVR vehicles are uncontrolled and released to the atmosphere. The current TOG emission factors for vehicle fueling predate the conversion to EVR systems, and do not account for the introduction of ORVR vehicles to California's motor vehicle fleet. Therefore, the current vehicle refueling emission factors are representative of non-ORVR vehicles only. Current and proposed vehicle fueling emission factors are presented in Table III -1 below. E1—E6 Pg169 Table III-1 Current and Revised TOG Emission. Factors for Vehicle Fueling Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Vehicle Category Current lbs/k al Revised lbslk al UEF Pre-EVR UEF Pre-EVR EVR Non-ORVR Vehicles 8.4 0.74 8.4 2.4 0.42 ORVR Vehicles N/A N/A 0.42 0.12 0.021 The method used to develop the revised vehicle fueling emission factors consists of determining an UEF and then applying control efficiency (CE) factors that are representative of in -use ORVR and Phase II vapor recovery systems, resulting in controlled emission factors for each possible combination of fuel dispensing systems, ORVR vehicles, and non-ORVR vehicles. The revised UEF for non-ORVR vehicle fueling was determined from vapor recovery certification tests performed by ARB staff and independent contractors, using ARB Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP -201.2, Efficiency and Emission Factor for Phase 11 Systems .3 In addition to vapor recovery certification testing, ARB staff has also performed tests of uncontrolled vehicle fueling at a GDF without a Phase II vapor recovery system, and at a GDF with a disabled Phase If vapor recovery system. The ARB test results determined the non-ORVR vehicle fueling UEF as 8.4 lbs/kgal, which agrees with and validates the current emission factor. The revised UEF for ORVR vehicles was calculated as 0.42 lbs/kgal based on the non- ORVR vehicle fueling UEF of 8.4 lbs/kgal and 95 percent control efficiency required for certification of ORVR systems. Test data from a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency study4. 5 suggest in -use efficiency greater than 95 percent. However, since the tests were performed on vehicles that were less than three model years old, ARB staff determined that the certification standard would represent the most conservative approach because an evaluation of the long term performance of the ORVR systems was not possible. -Phase II pre-EVR in -use control efficiency is estimated at 71 percent, based on results presented in two studies by local air districts in California. The first, performed by San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) in 2000,6 concluded that pre- EVR balance systems experienced equipment defects at levels resulting in an estimated 70 percent collection efficiency (with complete failure about 11 percent of the time). The second, performed by South Coast Air Quality Management District, shows that in 2006, prior to the Phase II EVR upgrade, about 92 percent of Phase II pre-EVR systems were balance type and 8 percent were vacuum assist type .7 Assuming pre- EVR vacuum assist systems experience the same 11 percent complete failure rate determined for balance systems by the SDCAPCD study, and the remaining 89 percent E1—E6 Pg170 operate at 95 percent collection efficiency, the calculated in -use control efficiency for Phase II pre-EVR systems is: Phase II pre-EVR CE = 0.92 * (Balance CE) + 0.08 * (0.89 * Assist CE) =0.92*(0.70)+0.08*(0.89*0.95)=0.71 The revised emission factors for Phase II pre-EVR systems were calculated using the non-ORVR vehicle fueling UEF of 8.4 lbs/kgal, 95 percent ORVR in -use control efficiency and 71 percent Phase II pre-EVR system in -use control efficiency as follows: ORVR, Phase II pre-EVR = (non-ORVR UEF)*(1 - ORVR CE)*(1- Ph II pre-EVR CE) _ (8.4 lbs/kgal) * (1 - 0.95) * (1 - 0.71) = 0.12 lbs/kgal Non-ORVR, Phase II pre-EVR = (non-ORVR UEF)*(1 - Ph II pre-EVR CE) _ (8.4 lbs/kgal) * (1 - 0.71) = 2.4 lbs/kgal Phase II EVR in -use control efficiency for non-ORVR vehicles is estimated at 95 percent based on results from 13 separate vapor recovery system efficiency tests performed by ARB staff between January 2009 and September 2010. The 13 tests represent 221 non-ORVR vehicle fueling events, and the overall vapor recovery system in -use control efficiency determined from these tests was 95 percent. The emission factors for Phase II EVR systems were calculated using the non-ORVR vehicle fueling UEF of 8.4 lbs/kgal, 95 percent ORVR in -use control efficiency and 95 percent Phase II EVR system in -use control efficiency as follows: ORVR, Phase II EVR = (non-ORVR UEF)*(1 - ORVR CE)*(1 - Ph If EVR CE) _ (8.4 lbs/kgal)*(1 - 0.95)*(1 - 0.95) = 0.021 lbs/kgal Non-ORVR, Phase II EVR = (non-ORVR UEF)*(1 - Ph II EVR CE) _ (8.4 lbs/kgal) * (1 - 0.95) = 0.42 lbs/kgal A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine the revised vehicle fueling emission factors, including all applicable references is presented in Attachment 1 to this document, Revised Emission Factors for Phase 11 Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. IV. PHASE I BULK TRANSFER LOSSES' Phase I bulk transfer losses are TOG emissions produced during the delivery of gasoline to an UST from a cargo tank, and are also referred to as working losses or transfer emissions. Transfer emissions are controlled by a Phase I vapor recovery system, which operates on the balance principle. As gasoline is transferred by gravity from a cargo tank to an UST, the rising UST liquid level displaces hydrocarbon vapors which are captured by the Phase I vapor recovery system and returned to the headspace area in the cargo tank. This process is again repeated when the cargo tank 7 E1—E6 Pg171 is refilled at a gasoline bulk terminal, and the vapors displaced from the cargo tank are either recovered as liquid gasoline by and adsorption/absorption process or oxidized by a flare. The current TOG bulk transfer emission factors predate implementation of ARB's EVR program. The current and revised TOG bulk transfer emission factors are presented in Table IV-] below. Table IV -1 Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Phase I Transfer Emissions at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Current lbs/k al Revised lbs/k al UEF Pre-EVR UEF Pre-EVR EVR 8.4 0.42 7.7 0.38 0.15 The method used to develop the revised gasoline bulk transfer emission factors consists of determining a gasoline bulk transfer UEF, and then applying CE factors that are representative of the level of control achieved by Phase I pre-EVR and Phase I EVR systems. The revised bulk transfer UEF was derived from UST headspace TOG concentration data obtained from five tests performed by ARB staff at a Sacramento, California GDF between February 2012 and September 2013. In determining the revised UEF, ARB staff assumes the average UST headspace TOG concentration measured in these tests is representative of the average TOG concentration of the vapor mass displaced from an UST during bulk gasoline transfer if the emissions were uncontrolled. Based on these test results, ARB staff determined the revised bulk transfer UEF as 7.7 lbs/kgal, which represents an 8 percent decrease from the current value of 8.4 lbs/kgal. Phase I pre-EVR in -use control efficiency is estimated at 95 percent, based on the performance standard for Phase I pre-EVR equipment certification and results from ten Phase I volumetric efficiency tests performed by ARB staff at gasoline bulk plant distribution facilities (bulk plant) prior to implementation of Phase I EVR. Results for each of the ten tests determined >95 percent volumetric efficiency during bulk transfer of gasoline from a cargo tank to the bulk plant UST. The revised emission factor for Phase I pre-EVR systems was calculated using the bulk transfer UEF of 7.7 lbs/kgal and 95 percent Phase I pre-EVR in -use control efficiency as follows: Phase I pre-EVR = (bulk transfer UEF) " (1 - Phase I pre-EVR CE) _ (7.7 lbs/kgal)' (1 - 0.95) = 0.38 lbs/kgal Phase I EVR in -use control efficiency is estimated at 98 percent, based on the performance standard for Phase I EVR equipment certification and results from ten Phase I volumetric efficiency tests performed by ARB staff at bulk plants after 0 E1—E6 Pg172 implementation of Phase I EVR. Results for each of the ten tests determined >98 percent volumetric efficiency during bulk transfer of gasoline from a cargo tank to the bulk plant UST. The emission factor for Phase I EVR systems was calculated using the bulk transfer UEF of 7.7 lbs/kgal and 98 percent Phase I-EVR in -use control efficiency as follows: Phase I EVR = (bulk transfer UEF) ` (1 - Phase I EVR CE) _ (7.7 lbs/kgal) " (1 - 0.98) = 0.15 lbs/kgal A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine the revised Phase I transfer emission factors, including all applicable references, is presented in Attachment 2 to this document, Revised Emission Factors for Phase I Gasoline Bulk Transfer at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities V. PRESSURE DRIVEN LOSSES Pressure driven, or breathing, losses are fugitive emissions from UST vent riser and/or Phase II vapor recovery components resulting from the day to day operations at a given GDF. These emissions are influenced by several variables, most notably: gasoline Reid vapor pressure (RVP) and evaporation rate, ORVR vehicle throughput, overnight facility shutdown or extended facility inactivity, gasoline delivery schedule, vapor recovery system operating principle and vapor recovery system pressure integrity. These variables can act singularly or in combination to elevate static pressure in UST headspace, resulting in pressure driven emissions. Current and revised pressure driven emission factors are presented in Table V-1 below. Current pressure driven emission factors for GDFs without Phase II vapor recovery (UEF) and with Phase II pre-EVR vapor recovery systems are 0.84 lbs/kgal and 0.10 lbs/kgal, respectively. There is no current emission factor applicable to GDFs equipped with Phase II EVR systems. Table V-1 Current and Revised TOG Pressure Driven Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Current lbs/kgal Revised lbs/kgal UEF Pre-EVR UEF Pre-EVR EVR 0.84 0.10 0.76 0.092 0.024 The revised UEF of 0.76 lbs/kgal was calculated from UST static pressure data collected at a fleet rental car GDF located in San Jose, California. This facility is exempt from Phase II vapor recovery requirements by Bay Area Air Quality Management District.8 UST static pressure data collected at this facility during two 30 - day periods were combined with fugitive flow rate equations in ARB Vapor Recovery Test ProcedureTP-201.2F, Pressure Related Fugitive Emissions,9 a TOG concentration of 46 percent as propane, and the facility gasoline throughput of 12,000 gallons per 0 E1—E6 Pg173 month to yield the revised UEF for pressure driven emissions from GDFs without Phase II systems. The 46 percent TOG concentration value used in UEF calculation is based on the average UST headspace TOG concentration measured during ten tests performed by ARB staff at three GDFs between February 2012 and September 2013. TOG concentrations were determined using non -dispersive infrared gas analyzers and sampling and quality assurance procedures referenced in ARB Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP -201.2, Efficiency and Emission Factor for Phase 11 Systems. The revised pressure driven emission factors for GDFs with Phase II pre-EVR and Phase II EVR systems were estimated as 0.092 lbs/kgal and 0.024 lbs/kgal, respectively. The revised emission factors were derived from data collected between November 2009 and October 2010 at six GDFs located in Northern California. These sites were randomly selected as part of an ARB program to examine the dynamics causing substantial increases in the number of ISD over -pressure alarms corresponding to the transition from summer formulated fuel with Reid vapor pressure (RVP) restricted to less than or equal to 7 pounds per square inch, to winter formulated fuel with no RVP restriction. The six sites represent a cross section of the characteristics associated with California GDFs, such as throughput category, vapor recovery system operating principle and 24-hour operation versus overnight closure. The reductions in revised pressure driven emission factors are primarily attributable to advancements in Phase II vapor recovery system technologies exclusive to EVR systems, such as: the Franklin -Healy vapor recovery nozzle which detects ORVR vehicles and reduces its V/L ratio, pressure management processors designed to maintain UST static pressure below defined levels, and ISD systems that monitor vapor recovery system operating parameters and alert GDF operators of vapor recovery equipment failures. A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine revised pressure driven emission factors, including all applicable references, is presented in Attachment 3, Revised Emission Factors for Pressure Driven Emissions at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. VI. PHASE II FUELING - SPILLAGE Gasoline spillage emissions are generated from liquid gasoline spills associated with vehicle fueling, including pre -fueling, fueling, and post -fueling spillage. The current and revised emission factors for gasoline spillage during vehicle fueling are presented in Table VI -1 below. 10 E1—E6 Pg174 Table VI-I Current and Revised TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline Spillage at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Current Ibs/kcal Revised lbs /k al UEF Pre-EVR UEF Pre-EVR EVR 0.64 0.42 0.61 0.42 0.24 Current emission factors for gasoline spillage at GDFs without Phase II vapor recovery (UEF) and with Phase II pre-EVR systems are 0.64 Ibs/kgal and 0.42 Ibs/kgal, respectively, based on data from tests performed by ARB, (Morgester et al., 1992).10 There is no current emission factor applicable to GDFs equipped with Phase 11 EVR systems. ARB staff has reviewed the test data used to calculate the current gasoline spillage UEF and pre-EVR emission factor. Based on this review, ARB staff determined the revised gasoline spillage UEF is 0.61 Ibs/kgal, and the revised gasoline spillage pre-EVR emission factor should remain at 0.42 Ibs/kgal. The revised emission factors are essentially unchanged from the current values because there have been no technical advancements for the respective nozzles since the current factors were established. The gasoline spillage emission factor for GDFs with Phase II EVR is 0.24 Ibs/kgal, which is the current performance standard referenced in ARB Certification Procedure CP -201, Certification Procedure for Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities." A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine the revised gasoline spillage emission factors, including all applicable references, is presented in Attachment 4, Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Spillage at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. VII. GASOLINE DISPENSING HOSE PERMEATION ARB adopted performance standards for gasoline dispensing hose permeation on July 26, 2012. Prior to adoption of these standards there were no hose permeation performance standards for California GDFs. Facilities subject to the standards will have four years from their effective date to comply. The effective date is defined as the date on which the first dispensing hose is certified by ARB to meet the new hose permeation performance standards. Hose permeation performance standards only apply to hoses in which liquid fuel comes into contact with the outer hose wall, specifically: Phase II vacuum assist and conventional (non -vapor recovery) hoses. Vacuum assist hoses account for approximately 70 percent of the almost 100,000 Phase II vapor recovery hoses installed at California GDFs .12 There are approximately 1,000 additional hoses installed at facilities without Phase II vapor recovery. The performance standards do not apply to 11 E1—E6 Pg175 hoses of balance Phase II vapor recovery systems, which dispense gasoline through the center region of a coaxial hose and transport vapor in the outer region. Figure VII -I illustrates the differences in fuel delivery and vapor return pathways for vacuum assist and balance vapor recovery hoses. Figure VII -I, Cutaways of Vapor Recovery GDF Hose Assemblies Showing Vapor and Liquid Paths Vapor Path Liquid Pai Vapor Balance Hose Permeation rates are influenced by several factors, the most significant of which are: fuel temperature, gasoline formulation, and concentration gradient across the barrier material. As is the case with vehicle refueling emissions, gasoline throughput to ORVR vehicles plays a role in the permeation rates of balance type hoses, because refueling of ORVR vehicles affects the concentration gradient across the outer wall of these hoses. Therefore, balance hose permeation emissions are expected to decline in future years as gasoline throughput to ORVR vehicles increases. When considering an isolated GDF hose, the permeation rate of liquid gasoline through vacuum assist and conventional hoses is relatively unaffected by activity level (i.e., the volume of gasoline dispensed or throughput). These hoses should permeate at the same daily rate as long as there is some level of activity. Therefore, the hose permeation emissions in tons per day can be estimated directly, independent of activity level. However, because other GDF emissions calculations are activity based, hose permeation emission factors were estimated as a function of activity level in order to maintain dimensional consistency with the emission factors proposed for the five other GDF subcategories. 12 E1—E6 Pg176 Hose permeation emission factors based on GDF activity and ORVR penetration for years 2013 and 2017 are presented in Table VII -1 below. Table VII -I Year 2013 and 2017 Hose Permeation TOG Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Year 2013 lbs/k al Year 2017 lbs/k al UEF Pre-EVR EVR UEFPre-EVR EVR 0.062 0.062 0.062 0.009 ± 0.009 0.009 The 2013 emission factors represent the uncontrolled permeation rates determined from ARB laboratory tests on vacuum assist, conventional and balance hoses. 13. 14 The 2017 controlled emission factors (CEF) assume full implementation of the 3.23 grams per meter squared per day (referenced to 71 °F) vacuum assist/conventional hose permeation standard at California GDFs. This factor reflects the predicted population of vacuum assist, conventional and balance hoses and their associated permeation rates using the following equation: GDF Hose CEF2017 CEFvac/con, 2017 0.002 lbs/kgal = 0.009 lbs/kgal + UEFb11,2017 + 0.007 lbs/kgal The 2017 hose permeation CEF of 0.009 lbs/kgal represents an 88% reduction in hose permeation emissions compared to the 2013 emissions baseline of 0.062 lbs/kgal. ARB's cost analysis suggests cost savings15 associated with low permeation hose conversion in both vapor recovery and non -vapor recovery applications. A more detailed description of the methodologies used to determine the proposed GDF hose permeation emission factors, including all applicable references and intermediate variables such as: permeation rates, hose surface areas, hose populations and gasoline throughput is presented in Attachment 5, Proposed Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. VIII. CONCLUSIONS The revised GDF emission factors show no change to the current UEF for Phas6 II non- ORVR vehicle refueling of 8.4 lbs/kgal; and a 17 percent percent reduction to the current UEF for Phase I transfer losses from 8.4 lbs/kgal to 7.0 lbs/kgal. The revised emission factor for refueling non-ORVR vehicles with Phase II pre-EVR systems of 2.4 lbs/kgal is approximately 3 times its current value of 0.74 lbs/kgal, due to the lower in - use efficiency assigned to Phase 11 pre-EVR systems. However, Phase II pre-EVR systems only account for approximately 3 percent of gasoline dispensed at California GDFs. 13 E1—E6 Pg177 The revised emission factors also include categories for GDFs with EVR equipment, which currently dispense approximately 95 percent of gasoline sold in California. There are no current emission factors for EVR categories, as the current emission factors predate EVR systems. The revised emission factors proposed for EVR categories are all significantly lower than the current pre-EVR values; and are reflective of both advancements in vapor recovery system performance achieved through ARB's EVR program and the increasing statewide gasoline throughput to ORVR vehicles. 14 E1—E6 Pg178 IX. REFERENCES I . Preliminary Analysis of U.S. EPA's Draft Regulation on Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery (ORVR) Widespread Use Determination and California's Enhanced Vapor Recovery (EVR) Requirements. J. Marconi, September 8, 2011. ?. California Air Resources Board Presentation: Enhanced Vapor Recovery Implementation Update, June 28, 2008. http://www.arb.Ga.gov/vapor/archive/2008/evrtalk062608.pdf. 3. ARB Stationary Source Test Procedures, Volume II, Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP -201.2. http://www.arb.ca.gov/testmeth/vol2/tp-201 2.1)df 3. SHED test data for 337 2004-2005 model vehicles is available from David Good, U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Compliance Information Systems. 5. NESCAUM Report — Onboard Refueling Vapor Recovery Systems Analysis of Widespread Use, pages 9-10, Skelton and Rector, 8/20/2007. 3. Barnard R. McEntire, Performance of Balance Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, San Diego Air Pollution Control District, May 18, 2000. 7. Data on 2006 Balance/Assist Split for Pre-EVR systems provided to Frances Cameron by South Coast Air Quality Management District Staff. 8. Bay Area Air Quality Management District Regulation 8, Rule 7, paragraph 112.9. 9. ARB Vapor Recovery Test ProcedureTP-201.2F, Pressure Related Fugitive Emissions. http://www.arb.ca.gov/testmeth/vol2/tp20l.2f Oct2003.pdf. 10. James J. Morgester, Robert L. Fricker, G. Henry Jordan (1992) Comparison of Spill Frequencies and Amounts at Vapor Recovery and Conventional Service Stations in California, Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, Vol 42, No. 3, pp284-289, March 1992. 11. ARB Certification Procedure CP -201, Certification Procedure for Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities. http://www.arb.ca.gov/testmeth/vol2/cp20l apri12013.r)df 12. ARB, Initial Statement of Reasons August 3, 2011, Appendix 4, Gasoline Dispensing Facility hose Emissions Inventory for Vacuum Assist and conventional Hoses. http://www.arb.ca.gov/vapor/rulemaking.htm. 15 E1-E6Pg179 13. ARB, Gasoline Dispensing Facility (GDF) Vacuum -Assist and Conventional Hose Permeation Study, July 19, 2010, Jason McPhee, P.E. 14. ARB, Gasoline Dispensing Facility (GDF) Balance Hose Permeation Study, June 19, 2008, revised October 6, 2010, Jason McPhee. 15. Cost Effectiveness Report: 2011 Amendments to the Regulation for Certification of Vapor Recovery Systems at Gasoline Dispensing Facilities, Jason McPhee, P.E. http://www.arb.ca.gov/vapor/rulemakin-g.htm MT E1—E6 Pg180 Attachments Attachment 1: Revised Emission Factors for Phase II Vehicle Fueling at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 2: Revised Emission Factors for Phase I Gasoline Bulk Transfer at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 3: Revised Emission Factors for Pressure Driven Emissions at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 4: Revised Emission Factors for Gasoline Spillage at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Attachment 5: Proposed Emission Factors for Gasoline Dispensing Hose Permeation at California Gasoline Dispensing Facilities E1—E6 Pg181 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study JN:02681804 Memotll Appendix C Site Plan and Google Earth Overlay E1 -E6 Pg182 a� 4 �'. -,. '"�^ . °Y" (gym j � � _ .G. '�'•�`n :'Y' F f•l mow t Distance of pumps to north • 61ftDistance of storage • °.tanksto northern r , • • 1, b ILL r' , 101V WA �L .�i _� ry • .+.1 '��"S Age _ 0 M-.4111 f .n ht was LOM A. � + � M M LO W A 8477Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study City of Rancho Cucamonga CA SCAQMD Response to Comments #1 8477 Archibald Gas Station/Car Wash Air quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study Response to Comments — Memodl JN:02681804 Memo#l' Appendix D Screen ingTables for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities CARB 2005 Air Quality and Land Use Handbook Table 1-1 E1—E6 Pg185 SCAQMD PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE "N" Tables Effective for Applications Deemed Complete On or After October 1. 2017 Table 12.1A - Screening Tables for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Underground Storage Tank (UST) Residential MICR per One Million Gallons of Gasoline SCAQMD 90 Version 6.1 E1 -E6 Pg 186 Downwind Distance (meters) Station Abbr. Location 25 50 75 100 200 300 500 1000 AZUS Azusa 2.884 1.040 0.550 0.340 0.093 0.045 0.018 0.006 BNAP Banning 4.208 1.703 0.940 0.603 0.186 0.093 0.039 0.013 CELA Central L.A. 2.484 0.876 0.455 0.287 0.085 0.041 0.017 0.005 ELS] Lake Elsinore 2.978 1.075 0.558 0.347 0.103 0.051 0.021 0.007 FONT Fontana 3.306 1.254 0.677 0.423 0.124 0.060 0.025 0.007 i\ISVJ Mission Viejo 2.721 0.981 0.515 0.319 0.094 0.047 0.018 0.006 PERI Perris 3.494 1.310 0.695 0.436 0.127 0.063 0.026 0.008 PICO Pico Rivera 2.629 0.956 0.509 0.316 0.091 0.044 0.018 0.005 RDLD Redlands 3.562 1.325 0.691 0.418 0.113 0.055 0.024 0.007 UPLA Upland 3.108 1.133 0.609 0.384 0.111 0.054 0,022 0.007 KBUR Burbank Airport 3.097 1.198 0.655 0.410 0.125 0.062 0.026 0.008 KCVO Chino Airport. 4.084 1.609 0.870 0.549 0.166 0.082 0.033 0.010 KCQT USC/Downtown L.A. 3.382 1.244 0.656 0.407 0.110 0.052 0.021 0.007 KFUL Fullerton Airport 2.726 1.027 0.553 0.348 0.104 0.052 0.021 0.007 KHIIR Hawthorne Airport 3.225 1.197 0.640 0.405 0.123 0.061 0.025 0.007 KLAX Los Angeles Int'LAirport 4.456 1.830 1.010 0.648 0.204 0.102 0.044 0.013 KLGB Long Beach Airport 3.417 1.394 0.764 0.488 0.151 0.076 0.033 0.010 KONT Ontario Airport 4.834 2.006 1.111 0.710 0.222 0.112 0.047 0.015 KPSP Palm Springs Airport 3.363 1.352 0.736 0.467 0.144 0.073 0.031 0.010 KRAL Riverside Airport 4.141 1.678 0.922 0.588 0.177 0.088 0.038 0.013 KSJ10 Santa Monica Airport 3.444 1.336 0.731 0.462 0.139 0.068 0.028 0.008 KSNA John Rayne Inti Airport 4.041 1.605 0.870 0549 0.164 0.079 0.032 0.010 KTRNI Desert Hot Springs Airport 3.820 1.553 0.848 0.540 0.163 0.082 0.035 0.010 K ,NY \'an Nuys Airport 2.909 1.132 0.608 0.378 0.111 0.055 0.022 0.007 SCAQMD 90 Version 6.1 E1 -E6 Pg 186 SCAQMD PERMIT APPLICATION PACKAGE "N" Tables Effective for Applications Deemed Complete On or After October 1. 2017 Table 12.2A - Screening Tables for Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Aboveground Storage Tank (AST) Residential MICR per One Million Gallons of Gasoline SCAQMD 92 Version 8.1 E1 -E6 Pgl87 Downwind Distance (meters) Station Abbr. Location 25 50 75 100 200 300 500 1000 AZUS Azusa 4.447 1.603 0.827 0.496 0.114 0.050 0.020 0.006 BNAP Banning 5.469 2.176 1.185 0.748 0.210 0.101 0.042 0.013 CELA Central L.A. 3.610 1.258 0.641 0.392 0.100 0.046 0.019 0.006 F.LSI Lake Elsinore 4.056 1.458 0.748 0.452 0.119 0.057 0.024 0.008 FONT Fontana 4.812 1.787 0.940 1 0.569 0.145 0.067 0.027 0.008 i1ISN'J Mission Viejo 3.600 1.276 0.650 0.395 0.108 0.052 0.021 0.007 PERI Perris 4.639 1.733 0.904 0.558 0.144 0.069 0.029 0.009 PICO Pico Rivera 3.720 1.342 0.699 0.421 0.106 0.049 0.019 0.006 RDLD Redlands 5.809 2.218 1.154 0.685 0.132 0.062 0.026 0.008 UPLA Upland 4.693 1.677 0.871 0.532 0.130 0.060 0.025 0.008 KBUR Burbank Airport 3.940 1.493 0.808 0.493 0.139 0.069 0.028 0.008 KCNO Chino Airport. 4.971 1.950 1.047 0.658 0.188 0.091 0.037 0.011 KCQT USC/Downtown L.A. 5.393 1.959 1.002 0.604 0.133 0.058 0.024 0.007 KFUL Fullerton Airport 3.614 1.336 0.699 0.429 0.118 0.058 0.024 0.007 KHHR Hawthorne Airport 4.415 1.593 0.837 0.511 0.140 0.067 0.027 0.008 KLAX Los Angeles Int'I Airport 5.624 2.316 1.257 0.794 0.227 0.111 0.047 0.015 KLGB Long Beach Airport 4.450 1.829 0.993 0.621 0.172 0.083 0.035 0.011 KONT Ontario Airport 5.990 2.494 1.370 0.862 0.249 0.121 0.051 0.017 KPSP Palm Springs Airport 4.148 1.691 0.915 0.573 0.163 0.080 0.034 0.010 KRAL Riverside Airport 5.770 2.318 1.244 0.776 0.202 0.096 0.041 0.013 KS"IO Santa Monica Airport 4.771 1.829 0.977 0.596 0.159 0.074 0.031 0.009 S. John Wayne Intl Airport 5.072 2.017 1.085 0.674 0.186 0.088 0.036 0.010 KTRDf Desert Hot Springs Airport 4.681 1.917 1.040 0.660 0.183 0.091 0.039 0.012 KVNV Van Nuys Airport 3.673 1.428 0.760 0.467 0.127 0.060 0.025 0.008 SCAQMD 92 Version 8.1 E1 -E6 Pgl87 Table 1-1 Recommendations on Siting New Sensitive Land Uses Such As Residences, Schools, Daycare Centers, Playgrounds, or Medical Facilities* Source Category Advisory Recommendations Freeways and Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet of a freeway, High -Traffic urban roads with 100,000 vehicles/day, or rural roads with 50,000 Roads vehicles/day. Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a distribution center (that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day, more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration Distribution units (TRUs) per day, or where TRU unit operations exceed 300 Centers hours per week). Take into account the configuration of existing distribution centers and avoid locating residences and other new sensitive land uses near entry and exit points. Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a major Rail Yards service and maintenance rail yard. Within one mile of a rail yard, consider possible siting limitations and mitigation approaches. • Avoid siting of new sensitive land uses immediately downwind of Ports ports in the most heavily impacted zones. Consult local air districts or the ARB on the status of pending analyses of health risks. • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses immediately downwind of Refineries petroleum refineries. Consult with local air districts and other local agencies to determine an appropriate se aration. Chrome Platers • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a chrome later. • Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 300 feet of any dry Dry Cleaners cleaning operation. For operations with two or more machines, Using provide 500 feet. For operations with 3 or more machines, consult Perchloro- with the local air district. ethylene Do not site new sensitive land uses in the same building with perc dry cleaning operations. Gasoline Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 300 feet of a large gas Dispensing station (defined as a facility with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons Facilities per year or greater). A 50 foot separation is recommended for typical gas dispensing facilities. *Notes: These recommendations are advisory. Land use agencies have to balance other considerations, including housing and transportation needs, economic development priorities, and other quality of life issues. Page 4 E1—E6 Pg188 • Recommendations are based primarily on data showing that the air pollution exposures addressed here (i.e., localized) can be reduced as much as 80% with the recommended separation. • The relative risk for these categories varies greatly (see Table 1-2). To determine the actual risk near a particular facility, a site-specific analysis would be required. Risk from diesel PM will decrease over time as cleaner technology phases in. • These recommendations are designed to fill a gap where information about existing facilities may not be readily available and are not designed to substitute for more specific information if it exists. The recommended distances take into account other factors in addition to available health risk data (see individual category descriptions). • Site-specific project design improvements may help reduce air pollution exposures and should also be considered when siting new sensitive land uses. • This table does not imply that mixed residential and commercial development in general is incompatible. Rather it focuses on known problems like dry cleaners using perchloroethylene that can be addressed with reasonable preventative actions. • A summary of the basis for the distance recommendations can be found in Table 1-2. Page 5 E1—E6 Pg 189 RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2015-00683, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL FORA 1.22 -ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2014-00683 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are"true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 1.22 -acre of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and the westerly parcel is presently improved with an inoperative service station and the easterly parcel is vacant. Said property is currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and E1—E6 Pg190 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 GPA DRC2015-00683—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development within the district in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and f. This amendment is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element; and g. The remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to meet the requirements of California Government Code Section 65583.2 and to accommodate the City's share of the regional housing need pursuant to Section 65584. The City's regional housing need includes a requirement for 209 Very Low Income housing units, 141 Low -Income housing units, 158 Moderate -Income housing units, and 340 Above Moderate Income housing units for a total of 848 housing units. The City has a total remaining regional housing need, by income level, of 191 Very Low, 130 Low, and 127 Moderate -Income units, for a total of 448 units. The 2013 Housing Element identifies adequate sites to accommodate an additional 844 housing units in the capacity analysis. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, providbs appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; the project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the 'surrounding residential, commercial, industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards; and E1—E6 Pg 191 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 GPA DRC2015-00683—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re- use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the E1—E6 Pg192 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-37 GPA DRC2015-00683—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. DRC2015- 00683, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto, 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Fran6isco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E6 Pg193 General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 —Archibald Oil Cl Existing: Low Medium Residential Proposed: General Commercial ATTACHMENT A E1—E6 Pg194 RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2015-00684, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FROM THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT FOR A 1.22 ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNS: 0208-291-05 AND 0208-291-06. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2015-00684, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development District Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application DRC2015-00684 and issued Resolution No. 18-37 recommending to the City Council that the associated General Plan Amendment No. DRC2015-00683 be approved. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to two parcels consisting of approximately 1.22 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and the westerly parcel is presently improved with an inoperative service station and the easterly parcel is vacant. Said property is currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and E1 -E6 Pg195 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 ZMA DRC2015-00684 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan and will provide for development, within the district, in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development; and d. This amendment does promote the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element; and e. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and b. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; the project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the surrounding residential, commercial, industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards; and C. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan as the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. Policy LU -1.2 states "Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate." The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials (General Plan Figure CM -2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU -2.4 states "Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re- use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. E1—E6 Pg196 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 ZMA DRC2015-00684 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined'that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Zoning Map Amendment No. DRC2015-00684, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E1—E6 Pg197 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-38 ZMA DRC2015-00684 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 LYE ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E6 Pg198 RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW NO. DRC2015-00682, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH RETAIL SALES IN AN EXISTING 1,728 SQUARE FOOT VACANT SERVICE STATION BUILDING, RE-ESTABLISH AN EXISTING 1,481 SQUARE FOOT CANOPY WITH 4 FUEL PUMPS, AND INSTALL A 968 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH ON A 29,456 SQUARE FOOT (0.676 ACRE) PARCEL IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PROPOSED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT) AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, LOCATED AT 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0208-291-05. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for the approval of Development Review No. DRC2015-00682, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting 4. On July 11, - 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting or duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and rdsolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 170 feet along Archibald Avenue and a street frontage of approximately 175 feet along Arrow Route and is presently improved with a vacant service station building and a fuel canopy with 4 fuel pumps; and E1—E6 Pg200 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. The application proposes to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and d. The project site is located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (a proposed General Commercial (GC) District and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and e. The Development Code Chapter 17.90.030 regulates Drive -In and Drive - Through Use and specifically identifies that uses with drive-through facilities shall be located 300 feet away from any intersection. However, per the Code "deviations to these provisions may be considered through the issuance of a site plan and Architectural [Design] Review Permit;" and f. The proposed site plan and building elevations were submitted as part of the plans associated with the proposed project. The proposed carwash is attached to, and integrated into, the design of the existing gas station building. It functions on the project site as an accessory use to the gas station. It is also screened as much as possible as seen from the intersection. Furthermore, the plotting of the carwash allows forfull vehicular circulation and emergency access around the site; and g. Due to these design characteristics, the Design Review Committee's recommendation of approval, and the Planning Commission's consideration of this proposal, which if approved, the 300 -foot setback is not necessary; and h. Eight parking spaces are required for this project; however, due to site constraints, the project site provides 7 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a request for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 to allow for a reduction in the required parking by one stall (or 12.5 percent); and i. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The proposed project is consistent with General Plan policies LU -1.2 and LU -2.4. The reestablishment of the existing service station and development of the carwash land use will serve the local E1—E6 Pg201 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 ,DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 population's fuel and carwash needs, and will support the surrounding community's needs as both Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are identified as Major Arterials with a significant daily traffic volume. The rehabilitation and reuse of this service station facility and the eventual infill development of the vacant easterly parcel will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The subject property is suitable for the uses permitted in the proposed district (General Commercial (GC) District) in terms of access, size, and compatibility with existing land use in the surrounding area as the project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. The vacant easterly parcel provides sufficient area for the development of a commercial land use consistent with all applicable development standards; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed project will meet all applicable requirements of the Development Code except parking and parking setback. The applicant has submitted requests, as allowed by the Code, for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 and Variance DRC2017-00831 to allow flexibility in the requirements for parking and parking setback; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site has been previously disturbed (development of the service station use) and by the surrounding residential, commercial, industrial, and educational development, and the project has been designed to appropriately address all applicable development standards. The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (i) A comment letter was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. Burrtec's comment addressed AB 341 and AB 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than 4 cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses E1—E6 Pg202 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. (ii) A comment letter was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soil contamination or groundwater contamination on-site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have never been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial Action Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001. The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. (iii) A comment letter was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions from a Tier 3 to a Tier 4. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments; and E1—E6 Pg203 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 5 b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Design Review DRC2015-00682 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. Environmental Mitigation Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) During grading activity, all construction equipment (>_ 150 horsepower) shall be California Air Resources Board (CARB) Tier 3 Certified or better. 2) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 3) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. E1—E6 Pg204 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 6 4) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 5) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 6) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 7) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 8) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 9) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 10) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 11) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through - seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. r Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. E1—E6 Pg205 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 7 Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 12) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 13) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Lona Term Project Operational Impacts 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 19) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 20) All commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is E1—E6 Pg206 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 8 occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor, construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. E1—E6 Pg207 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 9 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City Transfer collected specimens with a Bernardino County Archaeological permanent archiving. Geology and Soils of Rancho Cucamonga. copy of the report to San Information Center for 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. E1—E6 Pg208 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 10 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short- term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic - compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. E1—E6 Pg209 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 11 Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following; • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. E1—E6 Pg210 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 12 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Site Drainage Plan (SPB Engineering, May 2017) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans or building plans, the applicant shall submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the E1—E6 Pg211 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 13 location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. 3) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 4) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 5) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 6) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 8) During construction, the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10) Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. 11) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:OO p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 12) Prior to issuance of grading or building permits, the applicant shall submit evidence of noise control measures that include 1) vibratory pile drivers or other pile driving noise controls, 2) temporary sound curtains at least 8 feet tall placed around all noise producing equipment, and 3) fitting appropriate mufflers that achieve a minimum 20 dBA reduction in construction -related noise levels. E1—E6 Pg212 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 — ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 14 13) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 14) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise Mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Tribal Cultural Resources 1) The applicant shall contact the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation (GBMI-KN) and the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) to discuss Tribal Monitoring of the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. The monitor(s) must be approved by the Tribal Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s) will be required to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for the project site. 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the E1—E6 Pg213 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 15 immediate vicinity (within a 100 -foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5, and that code shall be enforced for the duration of the project. Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. The project applicant shall consult with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. 3) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 -foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist shall contact the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. The archaeologist shall prepare a mitigation plan and technical resources management report, which shall document the E1—E6 Pg214 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 16 inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Additionally, the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to provide Tribal input. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native Monitor. If the resources are. Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique archaeological resource" pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate with the applicant and the City to develop a formal treatment plan that would serve to reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, an SOI -qualified archaeologist shall be retained to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan, as well as a Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to the GBMI-KN and the SMBMI for review and comment. All in -field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored by a GBMI-KN and SMBMI Tribal Participant(s). The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with GBMI-KN and the SMBMI on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other cultural materials encountered during the project. 5) Non -Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership), E1—E6 Pg215 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-39 DR DRC2015-00682—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 17 function, and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returned to the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. Once ground -altering activities have ceased or the Project Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following notification to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E6 Pg216 Conditions of Approval Ri1NC}10 CommunityDevelopment Department QUCAMONOA Pment P Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. 2. The proposed signage/architectural treatment on the fuel canopy roof shall be removed and the existing terra cotta tiles shall remain. 3. The applicant shall comply with AB 341 and AB 1826, which require that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a three cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and shall also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 5. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 6. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 7. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 8. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 10. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 11. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg217 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 13. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 14. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm only. 16. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 17. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 18. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. , 19. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CityofRC.us E1 -E6 Pg218 Page 2 of 17 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard conditions of Approval 20. The site shall be developed and maintained Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior grading on file in the Planning Department, regulations. in accordance with the approved plans which include materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and the conditions contained herein, and Development Code 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 23. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 25. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 27. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 28. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening "shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 29. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CityofRC.us Page 3 of 17 E1—E6 Pg219 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 31. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 32. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 33. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 34. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 35. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. 36. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 37. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 38. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed: 5125/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 17 E1—E6 Pg220 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 40. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 41. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 42. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 43. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 44. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 45. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 46. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 47. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/25/2078 Page 5 of 17 E1—E6 Pg221 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial' standards as required and including: a. Curb adjacent sidewalk may remain, repair damaged sidewalk as required. b. Remove the most southerly drive approach on Archibald Avenue and replace with curb and gutter. c. A total of 50 feet on Archibald Avenue, measured from the street centerline, shall be dedicated to the City. d. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. e. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite north of the north project boundary and to the first pole offsite south of Arrow Route, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial' standards as required and including: a. Provide right-of-way dedication and construct right turn lane per City Standard Plan 119. b. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. c. Relocate the existing street light, as it is located at the proposed driveway. d. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. e. Provide a signing and striping plan. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CilyofRC.us E1—E6 Pg222 Page 6 of 17 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications i and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pole offsite west of Archibald Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Reconstruct access ramp at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 6. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05 for the benefit of the parcel to the east, APN 0208-291-06 for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east APN 0208-291-06 will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoff shall be dedicated per City Standards. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us page 7 of 17 E1—E6 Pg223 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR N Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. -Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 11. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 12. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the- development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 5/25/2018 vmv.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg224 Page 8 of 17 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the . City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 15. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. New canopy shall not reduce the clearance of the approved, submit tank and fuel dispensing plans Hazardous Materials Division. Subsequent to their Safety for building permit issuance. Canopy, store, of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department. Building and Safety Services Department existing canopy. When the entitlement process is to the San Bernardino County Fire Department, approval, bring approval letter to Building and and carwash plans shall be submitted to the City Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CityofRC.us Page 9 of 17 E1—E6 Pg225 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR N Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Design Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. A soils report is required for new structures. All disabled access to the site and building must be provided in accordance to current regulations at the time of plan check submittal. New trash enclosure roof structure must be of fire retardant lumber or non-combustible materials. Classify existing canopy as an S-1 occupancy. Installation of underground fuel tanks and dispensing fuel pumps require review and plan check approval from San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. CVWD - Provide a plumbing plan submittal to the local water purveyor. Building and Safety will not issue building permits until a plumbing first release is obtained by the applicant from CVWD. New area lights shall be minimum 14'-6" clear above the drive aisle, where lights overhang the drive aisle. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. Printed : 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us page 10 of 17 E1—E6 Pg226 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 1.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 1.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. As the project is proposing to move less than 50 cubic yards of earth, the project is conditioned to provide a precise drainage plan showing the elevation(s) of the new structures, new drainage features, including but not limited to, curbs and v -gutters, drainage pipe, catch basins, along with locations of new pavement, removal and replacement pavement(s), and pavement overlays. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CityofRC.uS Pagel 1 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg227 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 6. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPS shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 5125/218 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 0117 E1—E6 Pg228 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCH IBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 7. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated priorto infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity(77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, a., b., c., d., and e., above. Printed: 5/25/2018 WWW.Cityo Rc.us Page 13 of 17 E1—E6 Pg229 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 14. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 15. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 16. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking current adopted California Building Code. Printed: 5/25/2018 v .CilyofRC.us E1—E6 Pg230 shall obtain written permission from the line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the drainage plan shall show the maximum stall grades shall be constructed per the, Page 14 of 17 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held, within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Arrow Route) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 5/25/2018 N/'+' .CityofRC.us Page 15 of 17 E1—E6 Pg231 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grading ROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 29. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the -maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project -specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 34. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows 35. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg232 a drainage easement or letter from been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to Quality Management Plan shall be Page 16 of 17 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (xx Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk throygh a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 38. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 39. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 40. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CityofRC.us E1 -E6 Pg233 Page 17 of 17 RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2015-00681, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A 968 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR WASH ASSOCIATED WITH A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH RETAIL SALES IN AN EXISTING 1,728 SQUARE FOOT VACANT SERVICE STATION BUILDING AND RE- ESTABLISH AN EXISTING 1,481 SQUARE FOOT CANOPY WITH 4 FUEL PUMPS ON A 29,456 SQUARE FOOT (0.676 ACRE) PARCEL IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PROPOSED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT) AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, LOCATED AT 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0208-291-05. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. DRC2015-00681, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 170 feet along Archibald Avenue E1—E6 Pg234 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 CUP DRC2015-00681 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 and a street frontage of approximately 175 feet along Arrow Route and is presently improved with a vacant service station building and a fuel canopy with 4 fuel pumps; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. The application proposes to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and d. The project site is located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (a proposed General Commercial (GC) District and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and e. Eight parking spaces are required for this project; however, due to site constraints, the project site provides 7 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a request for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 to allow for a reduction in the required parking by one stall (or 12.5 percent); and f. Automated carwash land uses are a permitted land use in the General Commercial (GC) District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and g. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. Within the proposed General Commercial (GC) District, service stations are a permitted land use and carwashes are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed service station facility was designed to be compatible with all applicable development standards of the Development Code, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and b. That the site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is currently developed as a service station land use, although it has been inactive since 2002. E1—E6 Pg235 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 CUP DRC2015-00681 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 The project site is suitable for a service station land use, provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a service station and carwash facility; and C. That granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Subject to approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, establishment of the proposed service station and carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (i) A comment letter was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. Burrtec's comment addressed AB 341 and AB 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than 4 cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. (ii) A comment letter was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soil contamination or groundwater contamination on-site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have clever been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial Action E1—E6 Pg236 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 CUP DRC2015-00681 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001. The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. (iii) A comment letter was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions from a Tier 3 to a Tier 4. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings E1—E6 Pg237 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-40 CUP DRC2015-00681 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 5 upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00681 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 18-39 for Design Review DRC2015-00682 shall apply. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E6 Pg238 Conditions of Approval jjanl.no Community Development Department (;ru:1n¢wra Project #. DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. 2. The proposed signage/architectural treatment on the fuel canopy roof shall be removed and the existing terra cotta tiles shall remain. 3. The applicant shall comply with AB 341 and AB 1826, which require that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a three cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and shall also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 5. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 6. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 7. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 8. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 10. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 11. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg239 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 13. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 14. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm only. 16. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 17. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 18. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 19. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Printed: 5/25/2018 N .CityofRC.uS Page 2 of 17 E1—E6 Pg240 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR N Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning_ Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The site shall be developed and maintained Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior grading on file in the Planning Department, regulations. in accordance with the approved plans which include materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and the conditions contained herein, and Development Code 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 23. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 25. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 27. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 28. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening 'shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 29. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Printed: 5125/2018 ww t.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 17 E1—E6 Pg241 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 31. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 32. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 33. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 34. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 35. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. 36. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 37. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 38. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Primed: 5/25/2018 vn .CityofRC.us Page 4 of 17 E1—E6 Pg242 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 40. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 41. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 42. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 43. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 44. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 45. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other. stone veneers may be manufactured products. 46. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 47. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed. 5/25/2018 w .CltyofRC.us Page 5 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg243 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR /// Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineerinq Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial' standards as required and including: a. Curb adjacent sidewalk may remain, repair damaged sidewalk as required. b. Remove the most southerly drive approach on Archibald Avenue and replace with curb and gutter. c. A total of 50 feet on Archibald Avenue, measured from the street centerline, shall be dedicated to the City. d. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. e. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite north of the north project boundary and to the first pole offsite south of Arrow Route, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial' standards as required and including: a. Provide right-of-way dedication and construct right turn lane per City Standard Plan 119. b. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. c. Relocate the existing street light, as it is located at the proposed driveway. d. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. e. Provide a signing and striping plan. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg244 Page.6 of 17 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pole offsite west of Archibald Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Reconstruct access ramp at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 6. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05 for the benefit of the parcel to the east, APN 0208-291-06 for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east APN 0208-291-06 will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoff shall be dedicated per City Standards. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CilyofRC.us E1—E6 Pg245 Page 7 of 17 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 11. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 12. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, strlucture or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. vrwd.Cityo(RC.us 1 Printed: 5/2512018 page a of 7 E1—E6 Pg246 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Enqineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other ,permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross :sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 15. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. New canopy shall not reduce the clearance of the existing canopy. When the entitlement process is approved, submit tank and fuel dispensing plans to the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. Subsequent to their approval, bring approval letter to Building and Safety for building permit issuance. Canopy, store, and carwash plans shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department. Building and Safety Services Department Printed: 512512018 PoW i.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 17 E1—E6 Pg247 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Buildinq and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Design Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. A soils report is required for new structures. All disabled access to the site and building must be provided in accordance to current regulations at the time of plan check submittal. New trash enclosure roof structure must be of fire retardant lumber or non-combustible materials. Classify existing canopy as an S-1 occupancy Installation of underground fuel tanks and dispensing fuel pumps require review and plan check approval from San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. CVWD - Provide a plumbing plan submittal to the local water purveyor. Building and Safety will not issue building permits until a plumbing first release is obtained by the applicant from CVWD. New area lights shall be minimum 14'-6" clear above the drive aisle, where lights overhang the drive aisle. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us E1 -E6 Pg248 Page 10 of 17 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING 'CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 1.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 1.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. As the project is proposing to move less than 50 cubic yards of earth, the project is conditioned to provide a precise drainage plan showing the elevation(s) of the new structures, new drainage features, including but not limited to, curbs and v -gutters, drainage pipe, catch basins, along with locations of new pavement, removal and replacement pavement(s), and pavement overlays. Printed: 5/25/2018 1w W.CllyofRC.us Page 11 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg249 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 6. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to ,protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: evww.CityofRC.us 5/25/2018 Page 12 of 77 E1 -E6 Pg250 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 7. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function, as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. I. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, a., b., c., d., and e., above. Printed: 5/25/2018 ew v.CltyofRC.us Page 13 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg251 Project *: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCH IBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 14. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 15. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 16. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. Printed; 5/25!2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg252 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Arrow Route) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2ICRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 5/2512018 www.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg253 Page 15 of 17 Project;: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR N Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 29. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 34. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a drainage easement or letter from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. 35. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 17 E1—E6 Pg254 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ' ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (xx Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 38. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 39. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 40. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. Printed: 512512018 eway.CltyofRC.us Paget 7 of 17 E1—E6 Pg255 RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE NO. DRC2016-00831, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE PARKING SETBACK FROM 10 FEET TO 5 FEET -6 INCHES FOR THE PROPOSED REQUEST TO ESTABLISH RETAIL SALES IN AN EXISTING 1,728 SQUARE FOOT VACANT SERVICE STATION BUILDING, RE- ESTABLISH AN EXISTING 1,481 SQUARE FOOT CANOPY WITH 4 FUEL PUMPS, AND INSTALL A 968 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH ON A 29,456 SQUARE FOOT (0.676 ACRE) PARCEL IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PROPOSED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT) AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, LOCATED AT 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0208-291-05. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for the issuance of Variance No. DRC2016-00831 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 170 feet along Archibald Avenue E1—E6 Pg256 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2018 Page 2 and a street frontage of approximately 175 feet along Arrow Route and is presently improved with a vacant service station building and a fuel canopy with 4 fuel pumps; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. The application proposes to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and d. The application proposes to reduce the parking setback from 10 feet to 5 feet - 6 inches along the north property line associated with the request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and e. The project site is located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (a proposed General Commercial (GC) District and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and f. Eight parking spaces are required for this project; however, due to site constraints, the project site provides 7 parking spaces. The applicant has submitted a request for Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 to allow for a reduction in the required parking by one stall (or 12.5 percent); and g. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. Commercial development standards establish landscaped setbacks to separate and buffer between adjacent land uses. The proposed setback reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash and how this facility relates to adjacent properties. Specifically, the service station building is located in the center of the project site and the fuel pump canopy is located between the service station building and the Archibald Avenue street frontage. The addition of the carwash building adjacent to the service station, the addition of perimeter landscaping, and 7 additional E1—E6 Pg257 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2018 Page 3 parking spaces does makes enforcement of the development standard inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code as 4 of the proposed parking spaces had to shift northerly to provide sufficient room for on-site circulation around the north side of the service station building; and b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The existing project site is developed with the service station building, fuel canopy, street adjacent landscaping, minimal interior landscaping, and property line adjacent asphalt paving. Proposed improvements to reuse the service station building and fuel canopy, modify existing driveway access, install delineated parking spaces, and property line adjacent landscaping will significantly improve the appearance of a non -conforming site. Although the proposed parking is located 5.5 feet away from the property line, vehicles on- site were previously able to park property line adjacent. Proposed project improvements will allow for the addition of a landscaped buffer between existing land uses to the north and proposed improvements on-site; and C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. The setback reduction allows landscaping and parking to be distributed throughout the entire project site. There are numerous properties within the General Commercial (GC) District developed under either County standards prior to incorporation, or to City standards that permitted parking either at a 5 -foot minimum setback, or immediately adjacent to the property line. The strict enforcement of the required setback would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the same General Commercial (GC) District; and d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. The project site is located in a proposed General Commercial (GC) District, which was designed to accommodate a variety of land uses. There are numerous properties within the General Commercial (GC) District developed under either County standards prior to incorporation, or to City standards that permitted parking either at a 5 -foot minimum setback, or immediately adjacent to the property line. The approval of this variance application will not constitute•a grant of special privilege as other properties in the same General Commercial (GC) District enjoy the property right requested; and e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The requested reduction in the parking setback will not negatively impact the adjacent property owners. The existing Mulberry Early Education Center is situated approximately 160 feet north of their south property line, with parking and landscaping located between their facility and their south property line. Due to the existing building separation, the proposed setback reduction will not negatively impact properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment recommends the City Council adopt a E1—E6 Pg258 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2018 Page 4 Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (i) A comment letter was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. Burrtec's comment addressed AB 341 and AB 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than 4 cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. (ii) A comment letter was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soil contamination or groundwater contamination on-site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have never been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial Action Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001. The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. (iii) A comment letter was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The E1—E6 Pg259 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2018 Page 5 SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions from a Tier 3 to a Tier 4. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current CaIEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and, every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) The approval of Variance DRC2016-00831 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. E1—E6 Pg260 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-41 VAR DRC2016-00831 July 11, 2018 Page 6 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 18-39 for Design Review DRC2015-00682 shall apply. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E6 Pg261 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. 2. The proposed signage/architectural treatment on the fuel canopy roof shall be removed and the existing terra cotta tiles shall remain. 3. The applicant shall comply with AB 341 and AB 1826, which require that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a three cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and shall also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 5. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 6. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 7. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 8. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 10. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 11. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." Pdnted. 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg262 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR H/ Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level .of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 13. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 14. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm only. 16. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 17. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 18. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 19. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Printed: 612512018 �.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 17 E1—E6 Pg263 Project 4: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Plan nin Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 23. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 25. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 27. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 28. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening 'shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 29. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole - expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Printed: 5/25/2018 vnrnv.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 17 E1—E6 Pg264 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planninq Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 31. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 32. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of ,Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 33. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 34. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 35. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. 36. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 37. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any -parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 38. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed: 5/25/2018 �.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 17 E1—E6 Pg265 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR N Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planning ROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 40. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 41. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 42. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 43. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 44. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 45. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 46. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 47. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CityofRC.us E1 -E6 Pg266 Page 5 of 17 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR /// Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Enqineerinq Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Curb adjacent sidewalk may remain, repair damaged sidewalk as required. b. Remove the most southerly drive approach on Archibald Avenue and replace with curb and gutter. c. A total of 50 feet on Archibald Avenue, measured from the street centerline, shall be dedicated to the City. d. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. e. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite north of the north project boundary and to the first pole offsite south of Arrow Route, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Provide right-of-way dedication and construct right turn lane per City Standard Plan 119. b. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. c. Relocate the existing street light, as it is located at the proposed driveway. d. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. e. Provide a signing and striping plan. Printed: 5/25/2018 w w.CityofRC.us E1 -E6 Pg267 Page 6 of 17 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: Project Type: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pole offsite west of Archibald Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Reconstruct access ramp at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 6. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05 for the benefit of the parcel to the east, APN 0208-291-06 for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east APN 0208-291-06 will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoff shall be dedicated per City Standards. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg268 Page 7 or 17 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 11. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 12. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 5/25/2018 vnvw.CilyofRC.us Page 8 of 17 E1—E6 Pg269 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /H Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer, 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 15. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. New canopy shall not reduce the clearance of the existing canopy. When the entitlement process is approved, submit tank and fuel dispensing plans to the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. Subsequent to their approval, bring approval letter to Building and Safety for building permit issuance. Canopy, store, and carwash plans shall be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department. Building and Safety Services Department Printed: 5/25/2018 '"m.CltyofRC.us Page 9 of 11 E1—E6 Pg270 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Buildinq and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Design Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. A soils report is required for new structures. All disabled access to the site and building must be provided in accordance to current regulations at the time of plan check submittal. New trash enclosure roof structure must be of fire retardant lumber or non-combustible materials. Classify existing canopy as an S-1 occupancy. Installation of underground fuel tanks and dispensing fuel pumps require review and plan check approval from San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. CVWD - Provide a plumbing plan submittal to the local water purveyor. Building and Safety will not issue building permits until a plumbing first release is obtained by the applicant from CVWD. New area lights shall be minimum 14'-6" clear above the drive aisle, where lights overhang the drive aisle. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building, Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. Printed: 5/25/2018 vnvw.CllyofRC.us Page 10 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg271 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831; DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply. with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 1.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 1.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. As the project is proposing to move less than 50 cubic yards of earth, the project is conditioned to provide a precise drainage plan showing the elevation(s) of the new structures, new drainage features, including but not limited to, curbs and v -gutters, drainage pipe, catch basins, along with locations of new pavement, removal and replacement pavement(s), and pavement overlays. Printed: 5/25/2018 W t.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg272 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 6. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 5/25/2018 mm.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 17 E1—E6 Pg273 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grading ROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 7. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to .primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated priorto infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity(77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. I. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, a., b., c., d., and e., above. Printed: 5/25/2018 vw i.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg274 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 14. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 15. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 16. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. us Printed: 5/25/2018 vmv.CityofRC.page 74 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg275 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: I) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Arrow Route) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 5/25/2818 �.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 77 E1 -E6 Pg276 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 29. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..... of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 34. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows 35. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. a drainage easement or letter from been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to Quality Management Plan shall be Printed: 5/25/2018 ` i.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg277 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR /// Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (xx Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 38. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 39. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 40. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. Printed: 5/25/2018 ww .CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg278 Page 17 of 17 RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION NO. DRC2017-00879, A REQUEST TO REDUCE ON-SITE PARKING BY 12.5% FOR THE PROPOSED REQUEST TO ESTABLISH RETAIL SALES IN AN EXISTING 1,728 SQUARE FOOT VACANT SERVICE STATION BUILDING, RE-ESTABLISH AN EXISTING 1,481 SQUARE FOOT CANOPY WITH 4 FUEL PUMPS, AND INSTALL A 968 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH ON A 29,456 SQUARE FOOT (0.676 ACRE) PARCEL IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (PROPOSED GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT) AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND ARROW ROUTE, LOCATED AT 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0208-291-05. A. Recitals. 1. Archibald Oil filed an application for the issuance of Minor Exception No. DRC2017- 00879 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On June 13, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the June 27, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 3. On June 27, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the application to the July 11, 2018 Planning Commission meeting. 4. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route with a street frontage of approximately 170 feet along Archibald Avenue E1—E6 Pg279 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 2 and a street frontage of approximately 175 feet along Arrow Route and is presently improved with a vacant service station building and a fuel canopy with 4 fuel pumps; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated Low Medium Residential and is improved with the Mulberry Early Education Center. To the west is Archibald Avenue and beyond that the property is designated Office and is vacant. The property to the east is designated Low Medium Residential and contains a single-family house. To the south is Arrow Route and beyond that the property is designated General Commercial and is improved with a commercial center; and C. The application proposes to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and d. The application proposes to reduce the total on-site parking by 1 parking space, a proposed 12.5 percent reduction in the on-site parking requirement associated with a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re- establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 -square foot car wash on a 29,456 -square foot (0.676 acre) parcel; and e. The project site is located in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (a proposed General Commercial (GC) District and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards, except for the number of parking spaces and the minimum parking setback, which are addressed in the corresponding Variance and Minor Exception applications; and The project site provides 7 parking spaces; and g. The project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site, close the existing driveway at the southwest corner of the site, and relocate the existing driveway at the southeast corner of the site to a new shared driveway for the project site and the vacant property to the east; both driveways will be provided with decorative paving. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the General Plan, which has stated policies to designate appropriate land uses to support local community needs (LU -1.2) and to support development complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and reuse that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas (Policy LU -2.4). The proposed parking reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash.; and b. That the proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed project is compatible with the surrounding land uses as the project site is within the existing Low Medium (LM) Residential District and proposed General Commercial (GC) District, which will permit the re-establishment of the service station E1—E6 Pg280 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 3 land use. The proposed project will rehabilitate and reuse an existing service station building that has been closed since 2002 and the redesign and reuse of a project site that will contribute positively to the surrounding area; and C. That the proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed parking reduction is necessary due to design constraints between the existing service station use and the proposed carwash. Specifically, the service station building is located in the center of the project site and the fuel pump canopy is located between the service station building and the Archibald Avenue street frontage. The addition of the carwash building adjacent to the service station, the addition of perimeter landscaping, and the addition of 7 other parking spaces does not provide the opportunity to add any additional parking; and d. That the granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required number of parking spaces where the applicant has demonstrated that the project will provide adequate parking for all on-site uses. Operation and use of the fuel pumps does not require customers patronizing the project site to enter the service station building as fuel can be purchased directly at the fuel pump. Operation and use of the carwash facility is automated and a carwash can be purchased directly at the carwash facility. There is sufficient parking on-site to support the patronage of the service station food store. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and recommends the City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. (i) A comment letter was received from the Burrtec Waste Industries, dated May 18, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. Burrtec's comment addressed AB 341 and AB 1826, which requires that commercial businesses generating more than 4 cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a 3 -cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and should also make provisions for an additional bin for food E1—E6 Pg281 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879—ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 4 waste. Conditions of approval require the applicant to provide adequate trash bins for waste, recyclables, and food waste. (ii) A comment letter was received from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), dated May 23, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The DTSC's comments questioned whether any historic uses at the project site may have resulted in any release of hazardous waste/substances, if a Phase 1 Environmental Assessment had been prepared, if there are any PCB containing transformers on-site, whether underground storage tanks were used at the site, and if there is soil contamination or groundwater contamination on-site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment has not been prepared, the applicant indicated that there are none, and have never been, any PCB containing transformers on the project site, the underground storage tanks were previously removed, and provided a Remedial Action Completion Certificate, dated November 5, 2001. The Remedial Action Completion Certificate was issued by the County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Office of the Fire Marshall, Hazardous Materials Division for the project site indicating that no further remedial action is required. On June 13, 2018, the DTSC indicated that they have reviewed the applicant's response and had no further comments. (iii) A comment letter was received from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), dated May 29, 2018, in response to the circulated IS/MND. The SCAQMD's comments identified that since a permit is required by the SCAQMD they should be identified as a Responsible Agency on the MND and that the Final MND should demonstrate compliance with SCAQMD Rules. The SCAQMD indicated that the Air Quality analysis did not include operational ROG emissions generated from storage tanks or from the fueling process and recommended that a Health Risk Assessment analysis be prepared. The SQAQMD recommended a modification to the Air Quality Mitigation Measure, Short Term (Construction) Emissions from a Tier 3 to a Tier 4. Finally, the SCAQMD recommended utilizing the current. CalEEMod (Version 2016.3.2) in the air quality analysis. On June 6, 2018, the applicant's consultant (MD Acoustics) responded to SCAQMD comments. That response 1) recognized compliance with AQMD Rules 201, 203, and 461; 2) analyzed operational ROG emissions generated from the storage tanks and from the fueling process and found them to be below the daily VOC threshold; 3) identified that the project is below a threshold that would require a Health Risk Assessment; 4) analyzed and acknowledged the distance to sensitive receptors; 5) addressed compliance with CARB Tier 3; and 6) acknowledged that "revising the construction and operational emissions calculations is not expected to change the less than significant findings in the MND." On June 21, 2018, the SCAQMD concurred with the applicant's response and had no further comments; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial E1—E6 Pg282 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 5 evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore recommends the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City Council's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) The approval of Minor Exception DRC2017-00879 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2015-00683 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015-00684. 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 18-39, for Design Review DRC2015-00682 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary E1—E6 Pg283 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-42 ME DRC2017-00879 —ARCHIBALD OIL July 11, 2018 Page 6 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E1—E6 Pg284 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR N Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for a request to establish retail sales in an existing 1,728 square foot vacant service station building, re-establish an existing 1,481 square foot canopy with 4 fuel pumps, and install a 968 square foot car wash on a 29,456 square foot (0.676 acre) parcel in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District (proposed General Commercial (GC) District) at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route, located at 8477 Archibald Avenue. 2. The proposed signage/architectural treatment on the fuel canopy roof shall be removed and the existing terra cotta tiles shall remain. 3. The applicant shall comply with AB 341 and AB 1826, which require that commercial businesses generating more than four cubic yards of waste per week participate in a commercial waste recycling program, and that businesses that sell food must also participate in a food waste recycling program. The project will require at least a three cubic yard bin each for waste and mixed recyclables and shall also make provisions for an additional bin for food waste. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 5. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 6. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 7. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 8. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 9. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 10. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 11. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." Printed, 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg285 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m. until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading - No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. 13. Any outdoor vending machines shall be recessed into the building faces and shall not extend into the pedestrian walkways. The design details shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 14. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Trash collection shall occur between the hours of 7:00 am and 7:00 pm only. 16. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Department: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed• to be hidden from view. 17. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 18. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 19. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CityofRC.us Page 2 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg286 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR H/ Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 21. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 23. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 25. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 26. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 27. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 28. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building: Details shall be included in building plans. 29. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. Printed: 5/25/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 17 E1—E6 Pg287 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance t ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 31. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 32. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 33. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 34. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 35. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. 36. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 37. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 38. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed: 5/25/2018 vw .CityorRC.us Page 4 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg288 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Plannin Department Standard Conditions of Approval 39. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 40. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style; illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 41. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 42. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 43. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 44. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 45. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 46. Trash receptacle(s) are required and number of trash receptacles shall be issuance of Building Permits. 47. The applicant shall contact the U.S. mailboxes. shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CilyofRC.us E1—E6 Pg289 Page 5 of 17 Project #: Project Name Location: Project Type: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 DR /// Archibald Oil 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Archibald Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial' standards as required and including: a. Curb adjacent sidewalk may remain, repair damaged sidewalk as required. b. Remove the most southerly drive approach on Archibald Avenue and replace with curb and gutter. c. A total of 50 feet on Archibald Avenue, measured from the street centerline, shall be dedicated to the City. d. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. e. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. 2. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Archibald Avenue shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite north of the north project boundary and to the first pole offsite south of Arrow Route, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 3. Arrow Route frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Arterial" standards as required and including: a. Provide right-of-way dedication and construct right turn lane per City Standard Plan 119. b. Relocate existing traffic signal equipment. c. Relocate the existing street light, as it is located at the proposed driveway. d. Drive approach shall be a minimum width of 35 feet per City Standard Plan 101, Type C. e. Provide a signing and striping plan. Printed: 5/25/2018 mvi.CityofRC.us E1—E6 Pg290 Page 6 of 17 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineerinq Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pole offsite west of Archibald Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvement being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. 5. Reconstruct access ramp at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route to comply with current ADA requirements. A detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Design shall be completed and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 6. Provide an easement along the easterly portion of the 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05 for the benefit of the parcel to the east, APN 0208-291-06 for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. When the parcel to the east develops they will be required to provide an easement along the westerly portion of their property for ingress and egress, for a shared driveway. If the parcel to the east APN 0208-291-06 will allow the easement along the westerly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of 8477 Archibald Avenue, APN 0208-291-05, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoff shall be dedicated per City Standards. 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD -2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. Printed; 5/25/2018 vrvnv.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 17 E1—E6 Pg291 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 11. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 12. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 5125/2018 vmw.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 17 E1—E6 Pg292 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Enqineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 15. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. New canopy shall not reduce the clearance of the approved, submit tank and fuel dispensing plans Hazardous Materials Division. Subsequent to their Safety for building permit issuance. Canopy, store, of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department. Building and Safety Services Department existing canopy. When the entitlement process is to the San Bernardino County Fire Department, approval, bring approval letter to Building and and carwash plans shall be submitted to the City Printed: 5/25/2018 vn'Av.CityofRC.us Page 9 o 17 E1—E6 Pg293 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Builc[Lin A and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Design Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. A soils report is required for new structures. All disabled access to the site and building must be provided in accordance to current regulations at the time of plan check submittal. New trash enclosure roof structure must be of fire retardant lumber or non-combustible materials. Classify existing canopy as an S-1 occupancy. Installation of underground fuel tanks and dispensing fuel pumps require review and plan check approval from San Bernardino County Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Division. CVWD - Provide a plumbing plan submittal to the local water purveyor. Building and Safety will not issue building permits until a plumbing first release is obtained by the applicant from CVWD. New area lights shall be minimum 14'-6" clear above the drive aisle, where lights overhang the drive aisle. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage. path. tvww.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/25/2018 page 10 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg294 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 1.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 1.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. As the project is proposing to move less than 50 cubic yards of earth, the project is conditioned to provide a precise drainage plan showing the elevation(s) of the new structures, new drainage features, including but not limited to, curbs and v -gutters, drainage pipe, catch basins, along with locations of new pavement, removal and replacement pavement(s), and pavement overlays. Printed: 5/25/2018 %n .CityofRC.us Page 11 of 17 E1—E6 Pg295 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 5. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 6. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the "current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 5/25/2019 vw .CityofRC.us Page 12 of 17 E1—E6 Pg296 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 7. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment .BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located. at least 100 feet 'horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. I. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items, a., b., c., d., and e., above. Printed: 5/25/2018 mm.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg297 Project #: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 14. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 15. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 16. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 18. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line., 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CltyofRC.us Page 14 of 17 E1 -E6 Pg298 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 21. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: I) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 22. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Arrow Route) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 23. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 24. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the -grading and drainage plan. 25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 5/25/2018 w .CilyofRC.uS Page 15 of 17 E1—E6 Pg299 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS .APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 29. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned afid pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix. D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 34. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a drainage easement or letter from the downstream property owners accepting concentrated drainage flows. 35. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed: 5/25/2018 ww .CityofRC.us Page 16 of 17 E1—E6 Pg300 Project#: DRC2015-00682 CEQA2015-00029, DRC2016-00831, DRC2017-00879 Project Name: DR /// Archibald Oil Location: 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020829105-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review, Minor Exception, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 37. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (xx Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 38. The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and. Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 39. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 40. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed proposed structures and drainage of the site. applicant shall location and elevations of Printed: 5/25/2018 v .CityofRC.us Page 17 of 17 E1—E6 Pg301 REPORT DATE: July 11, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2013-00229 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH — A request to add 2,390 square feet of floor area to an existing 4,849 square foot church on 4.98 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, on the west side of Sapphire Street south of Lemon Avenue, located at 6386 Sapphire Street; APN: 1062-332-25. Related Files: Minor Design Review DRC2013-00230. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Minor Additions to Existing Developments. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00230 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH — A request to add 2,390 square feet of floor area to an existing 4,849 square foot church and the addition of 100 parking spaces to an existing 52 space parking lot on 4.98 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, on the west side of Sapphire Street south of Lemon Street, located at 6386 Sapphire Street; APN: 1062-332-25. Related Files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2013-00229. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, Minor Additions to Existing Developments. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolutions approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2013-00229 and Minor Design Review DRC2013-00230. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to expand the existing 4,849 square foot church through the addition of 2,390 square feet of floor area, to include additional sanctuary seating, a priest's office, baptism room, cry room, holy bread room, and new bathrooms, as well as the addition of 100 additional parking spaces to the existing 52 space parking lot, on APN 1062-322-25. The project site is adjacent to existing residential uses to the north, south, east, and west as indicated in the following table. E7—E8 Pg1 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Church Very Low Residential Very Low VL Residential District North Existing single-family residential Very Low Residential Very Low VL Residential District South Existing single-family residential Low Residential Low L Residential District East Existing single-family residential Low Residential Low L Residential District West Existing single-family residential Existing single-family residential Very Low (VL) Residential District E7—E8 Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP DRC2013-00229 AND MDR DRC2013-00230 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH July 11, 2018 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. Background: There are a series of applications that have been submitted for improvements to the project site, beginning in 1983. These include the following: Application Request Action Expiration The proposed development of a CUP 83-04 4,054 square foot church and Planning Commission N/A church master plan. Approval April 27, 1983 Request to convert existing Planning Commission CUP 84-21 residence on adjacent parcel to Approval November 25, N/A church office. 1987 CUP 84-21 Remodel existing residential No action taken, within Modification garage to office/conference room. scope of prior a royal NIA CUP 89-05 Proposed church master plan. Withdrawn NIA CUP 96-07 Request to add 3 temporary Planning Commission modular buildings. Approval June 12, 1996 June 12, 2001 DRC2001-00770 Modular building time extension. Planning Commissi aon13, 2002 A royal Febru February 12, 2007 Planning Commission DRC2009-00370 Modular building time extension. A royal Au gust11, 2009 August 11, 2014 DRC2014-01046 SDR for 399 square foot utility Planning Director Approval February 4, 2020 expansion. 1 February 4,2015 B. Conditional Use Permit DRC2013-00229: The applicant proposes to expand the floor area of the existing church (described further below) which requires a Conditional Use Permit. The Development Code (RCMC Section 17.16.120.A) identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, churches are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Here, the original church and church master plan were approved in 1983 and provided for the development of the existing church building and related parking lot improvements. The original church building and parking lot were developed; the remainder of the church's master plan was not developed. Due to the significant passage of time since the original application was approved, the fact that proposed expansion was not contemplated in the original approval, and the potential for additional services and church membership staff requested that the applicant submit a new Conditional Use Permit application. The proposed application includes an expansion of the church sanctuary, which results in an intensification of the existing church use through adding additional floor area that supports church activities and activities ancillary to the church sanctuary. Because the additional floor area is designed in support of the existing church, is a marginal increase in existing floor area, is designed for architectural compatibility with the existing church building, and will expand the existing parking lot capacity — thereby reducing impacts to adjacent residential neighborhoods — staff supports the proposed floor area and parking lot expansion. E7—E8 Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP DRC2013-00229 AND MDR DRC2013-00230 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH July 11, 2018 Page 3 The existing operational schedule for the St. Yostina Church includes church services on Sunday, Wednesday, and Friday mornings from 8:00 am to 12:00 pm, and Saturday evening from 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm. Additional church services are held throughout the year celebrating various religious holidays and other special events. C. Conditional Use Permit Findings: The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the City's Development Code Section 17.16.120(D): Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or City regulations/standards. Fact: Within the Very Low (VL) Residential District churches are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed church expansion was designed to be compatible with all applicable development standards of the Development Code, including parking, building setbacks, and building height. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The 4.98 -acre project site is currently developed as a church land use on the approximate southerly third of the project site, the remainder of the site is vacant and is used for occasional overflow parking. The project site is suitable as a church use, has been used as a church for the past 35 years, and has sufficient project area to accommodate the 2,390 square foot building addition to the existing 4,849 square foot church. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: The project site has been utilized for a church land use since 1983 and its expansion and continued operation will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards and performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent residential properties. D. Minor Design Review DRC2013-00230: The application proposes to expand the existing church sanctuary floor area by 330 square feet (including the addition of 50 seats), the addition of a 342 square foot baptismal room, a 342 square foot cry room, a 342 square foot priest's office, a 342 square foot holy bread room, and other ancillary floor area (i.e., bathrooms, hallways, etc.). The architecture of the proposed building addition was designed for consistency with the exiting building and utilizes a design, massing, and materials consistent with the existing church building. Building materials include stucco siding, stucco trim elements, arched windows and doors, stone, and tile roof. E7—E8 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP DRC2013-00229 AND MDR DRC2013-00230 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH July 11, 2018 Page 4 E. Project Parking Analysis: The number of parking spaces for a church land use is based on the seating capacity of the main sanctuary and can be based upon either the number of seats (1 parking space for each 3 seats) or the floor area of the main sanctuary (1 parking space for each 35 feet of floor area). Here, the existing sanctuary has 290 seats and a parking requirement of 97 parking spaces, and the proposed addition will add 50 seats to the sanctuary and an additional parking requirement of 17 parking spaces; a total of 114 parking spaces. Although the proposed cry room and baptismal room include additional seats, they do not add to the seating capacity of the main sanctuary floor area and do not establish an additional parking requirement. In addition to the proposed building expansion, the project proposes the development of additional parking areas to support the current use of the church. Because the existing church site is significantly under parked by 45 parking spaces, many of those persons attending church services are required to either park on the surrounding streets or in the unimproved dirt field north of the church building. Parking in both of those areas significantly impacts surrounding residents, either by parking on the street, or by creating dust from parking on the unimproved field. The Development Code (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC) Section 17.64) establishes parking requirements for the project as follows: F. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties located within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at the St. Yostina Church on November 30, 2017. Approximately 6 people attended the meeting, representing 4 adjacent property owners. The applicant's representative provided an overview of the project and informed the residents of the proposed project including the proposed building expansion and proposed parking lot improvements. Questions were raised regarding the proposed expansion, future expansion of the church use, expansion of the parking lot, and minimizing impacts to adjacent properties. The applicant indicated that the proposed expansion includes the priest's office, new bathrooms, a cry room, and a holy bread room; and that the proposed parking lot expansion will allow church members to park on a paved parking lot and not on an unimproved lot or on adjacent streets, thereby minimizing impacts to adjacent properties. G. Environmental Assessment: Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301- Existing Facilities, which covers minor additions to existing developments. The project contemplates adding about 2390 square feet to an existing church. The expansion is negligible as it is less than 50% of the existing structure. E7—E8 Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP DRC2013-00229 AND MDR DRC2013-00230 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH July 11, 2018 Page 5 FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The overall project, during construction may increase construction -related employment and, following its completion, will increase employment due to new commercial uses, and may increase employment at surrounding existing and future businesses that will provide services to the employees and customers of the project. Also, a positive fiscal impact for the City will occur through increased sales tax revenue generated by the employees and customer patronage of local businesses. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the application, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code as the General Plan land use and zoning designations of the project site is Very Low Residential and Very Low (VL) Residential District, respectively, and the Conditional Use Permit allows for the development of churches in residential areas. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Floor Plan Exhibit D - Elevations Exhibit E - Operational Schedule Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2013-00229 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Design Review DRC2013-00230 CB:TG/ss E7—E8 Pg5 m FEE sig MEMOES aoa®®ril men EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B E7-E8Pg7 4 - CO w =o Q Qo 00 Qo EXHIBIT C Nq 11 B® mm 7 - LZ Ri 1! i lie; sit EXHIBIT E7 -E8 Pg9 m� 'tile GB ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING 400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 UPLAND, CA, 91786 (909) 949-6999 FAX (909) 949-2928 PROJECT: - ADRESS: - PROJECT NO DATE: _ SHEET OF SHEET Sainta Yostina church Operation schedule 6386 sapphier st Sunday 8a m to 12 noon for Mass wenesday 8a m to noon for Mass Friday 8am to 1030 For Mass Saturday 7pm to 9pm for Bible study EXHIBIT E E7 -E8 Pg 10 RESOLUTION NO. 18-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2013-00229, A REQUEST TO ADD 2,390 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA TO AN EXISTING 4,849 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH ON 4.98 ACRES IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ON THE WEST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET SOUTH OF LEMON AVENUE, LOCATED AT 6386 SAPPHIRE STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 1062-332-25. A. Recitals 1. St. Yostina Church filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. DRC2013-00229, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application". 2. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Lemon Avenue, at 6386 Sapphire Street with a street frontage of approximately 663 feet along Sapphire Street and a lot depth of 328 feet, and is presently improved with a 4,849 square foot church and 52 parking spaces; and b. The property to the north and west contains single family homes and is in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, and the property to the east and south contains single-family homes in the Low (L) Residential District; and C. The application proposes to expand the existing church sanctuary floor area by 330 square feet (including the addition of 50 seats), the addition of a 342 square foot baptismal room, a 342 square foot cry room, a 342 square foot priest's office, a 342 square foot holy bread room, and other ancillary floor area (i.e., bathrooms, hallways, etc.); and E7—E8 Pg11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-35 CUP DRC2013-00229 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH July 11, 2018 Page 2 d. The project site currently contains 52 parking spaces, which operates at a deficiency of 45 parking spaces; and e. The project proposes the addition of 100 parking spaces to support existing and proposed church; and f. The project was designed to meet all applicable development standards of the Development Code relating to the development of churches in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, including building setbacks, building height, maximum lot coverage, and parking. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or City regulations/standards. Within the Very Low (VL) Residential District churches are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed church expansion was designed to be compatible with all applicable development standards of the Development Code, including parking, building setbacks, and building height; and b. That the site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The 4.98 -acre project site is currently developed as a church land use on the approximate southerly third of the project site, the remainder of the site is vacant and is used for occasional overflow parking. The project site is suitable as a church use, has been used as a church for the past 35 years, and has sufficient project area to accommodate the 2,390 square foot building addition to the existing 4,849 square foot church; and C. That granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project site has been utilized for a church land use since 1983 and its expansion and continued operation will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards and performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. 4. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301- Existing Facilities, which covers minor alterations to existing structures involving negligible expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agencies determination, and the proposed addition will not result in the addition of more than 2,500 square feet of floor area. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. E7—E8 Pg 12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-35 CUP DRC2013-00229 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH July 11, 2018 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L#3'tl ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E7—E8 Pg 13 / Conditions of Approval jjtnctw Cmaauivan Community Development Department Project #: DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR N St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planning ROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the addition of 2,390 square feet of floor area to an existing 4,849 square foot church and the addition of 100 parking spaces to an existing 52 space parking lot in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Lemon Avenue; located at 6386 Sapphire Street; APN: 1062-332-25. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 3. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 4. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 5. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 6. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 7. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 8. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 9. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. vr.m.CitycfRC.us Printed: 6/282078 E7—E8 Pg14 Project #: • DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 11. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 12. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 13. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect buildings with open space and parking areas. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 18. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. Theapplicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 19. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 20. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 21. For non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 22. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. Printed: 6/28/2018 %v%vw.CityofRC.us Pay= 2 or 11 E7—E8 Pg 15 Project#: DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Please be advised of the following Engineering Special Condition: Number of parking stalls shall comply with the Development Code Section 17.64 2. Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-07 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 12, 1996. At the time, the Planning Commission discussed the Utility Undergrounding requirement and placed the following condition of approval: "The fee for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities shall be waived until the next permanent structure is constructed. At that time, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Sapphire Street shall be paid to the City, prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage." This in -lieu fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 3. The City's drainage development impact fees shall be paid at time of building permit issuance. A portion of the drainage impact fee has been paid for the area of the site that is already developed . This application shall be responsible for payment of additional developed area. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits and/or Grading Permit(s). Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new and existing structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Fire walls may be required to separate the exiting trailers form the proposed construction or the trailers may have to be relocated or removed. A fire alarm is required through out the entire facility. Printed: 6/28/2018 vnvw.CilyofRC.us E7—E8 Pg 16 Page 3 of 11 Project #: • DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 2. The subgrade for the permeable paver storm water treatment devices shall have a level subgrade. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a pad elevation for the permeable paver subgrade on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing the permeable paver subgrade as level. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 4. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 5. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 6. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 7. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. Printed: 612812018 VAVW.CityofRC.us E7—E8 Pg 17 Page 4 of 11 Project #: DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR N St Justine Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 18. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Sapphire Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. Printed: 6/28/2018 mvw.CityofRC.us E7—E8 Pg 18 Page 5 of 11 Project 4: - DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 21. The USEPA regulations include the term "common plan of development or sale" to ensure that acreage within a common project does not artificially escape the permit requirements because construction activities are phased, split among smaller parcels, or completed by different phases. In keeping with the intent of this USEPA regulation the applicant as a condition of approval shall be required to submit a final project -specific water quality management plan to the City Engineer, or their designee, prior to the issuance of grading permits and/or building permits. This final project -specific water quality management plan shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 22.A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12 -inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 24. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 27. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. Printed: 6/2812018 vnvw.CltyofRC.us E7—E8 Pg 19 Page 6 of 11 Project #: DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR N St Justin@ Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 29. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 30. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 32. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 33. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality 'Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 34. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 35. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. Printed: 6128/2018 vnvw.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 11 E7—E8 Pg20 Project #: • DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 38. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 39. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 6/28/2018 vnwv.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 11 E7—E8. Pg21 Project#: . DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grading ROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. Section 1.5.1, Table 1-1 Priority Projects, Category No. 1, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans reads "All significant re -development projects — defined as the addition or replacement of 5,000 or more square feet (sq. ft.) of impervious surface on an already developed site subject to discretionary approval of the permitting jurisdiction . In addition: Where re -development results in an increase of 50% or more of the impervious surfaces of a previously existing developed site, the numeric sizing criteria discussed in Section 4 applies to the entire development. The project is showing unknown square feet of existing impervious area on the entitlement submittal dated September 12, 2017. The project is showing 37,717 square feet of proposed and/or removal and replacement of impervious area. The proposed/removal/replacement impervious area equals or exceeds 50% of the existing impervious area, the project is conditioned, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, to prepare a final project -specific water quality management plan to treat the storm water runoff of the entire development's impervious area. 43. The direction of storm water flow flowing across the permeable paver storm water treatment device is a small area compared to the total area of each of the permeable paver locations. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record. shall provide a design which will allow the storm water to evenly flow into the permeable paver gravel base (such as a catch basin with a perforated pipe running under the length of the permeable paver area, or a similar design), and shall show the design on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing how the storm water is evenly distributed into the permeable paver gravel base. vvww.CityofRC.us Printed: 6Y28@018 Page 9 or 11 E7—E8 Pg22 Project#: - DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR N St Justine Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 44. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily. traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities(79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. In. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. 45. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. vnrnv.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/28/2018 E7—E8 Pg23 Page 10 of 11 Project 3�: DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 46. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. 47. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. vnvw.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/282016 Page 11 of 11 E7—E8 Pg24 RESOLUTION NO. 18-36 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW NO. DRC2013-00230, A REQUEST TO ADD 2,390 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA TO AN EXISTING 4,849 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH AND THE ADDITION OF 100 PARKING SPACES TO AN EXISTING 52 SPACE PARKING LOT ON 4.98 ACRES IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ON THE WEST SIDE OF SAPPHIRE STREET SOUTH OF LEMON STREET, LOCATED AT 6386 SAPPHIRE STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1062-332-25. A. Recitals 1. St. Yostina Church filed an application for the approval of Minor Design Review No. DRC2013-00230, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On July 11, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting or duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Lemon Avenue, at 6386 Sapphire Street with a street frontage of approximately 663 feet along Sapphire Street and a lot depth of 328 feet, and is presently improved with a 4,849 square foot church and 52 parking spaces; and b. The property to the north and west contains single family homes and is in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, and the property to the east and south contains single-family homes in the Low (L) Residential District; and C. The application proposes to expand the existing church sanctuary floor area by 330 square feet (including the addition of 50 seats), the addition of a 342 square foot baptismal E7—E8 Pg25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-36 MDR DRC2013-00230 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH July 11, 2018 Page 2 room, a 342 square foot cry room, a 342 square foot priest office, a 342 square foot holy bread room, and other ancillary floor area (i.e., bathrooms, hallways, etc.); and d. The project site currently contains 52 parking spaces, which operates at a deficiency of 45 parking spaces; and e. The project proposes the addition of 100 parking spaces to support existing and proposed church; and f. The project was designed to meet all applicable development standards of the Development Code relating to the development of churches in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, including building setbacks, building height, maximum lot coverage, and parking. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies under the Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301- Existing Facilities, which covers minor alterations to existing structures involving negligible expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agencies determination, and the proposed addition will not result in the addition of more than 2,500 square feet of floor area. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. E7—E8 Pg26 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-36 MDR DRC2013-00230 — ST. YOSTINA CHURCH July 11, 2018 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E7—E8 Pg27 Project #: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR N St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Approval is for the addition of 2,390 square feet of floor area to an existing 4,849 square foot church and the addition of 100 parking spaces to an existing 52 space parking lot in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, on the west side of Sapphire Street, south of Lemon Avenue; located at 6386 Sapphire Street; APN: 1062-332-25. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 3. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 4. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 5. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 6. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 7. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 8. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 9. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 612812018 E7—E8 Pg28 Project #: • DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR N St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 11. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 12. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 13. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect buildings with open space and parking areas. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 17. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 18. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The .City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 19. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 20. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 21. For non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 22. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 612812018 E7—E8 Pg29 page 2 of 11 Project #: DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Please be advised of the following Engineering Special Condition: Number of parking stalls shall comply with the Development Code Section 17.64 2. Conditional Use Permit CUP 96-07 was approved by the Planning Commission on June 12, 1996. At the time, the Planning Commission discussed the Utility Undergrounding requirement and placed the following condition of approval: "The fee for future undergrounding of existing overhead utilities shall be waived until the next permanent structure is constructed. At that time, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunication and electrical) on the opposite side of Sapphire Street shall be paid to the City, prior to the issuance of building permits. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage." This in -lieu fee shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 3. The City's drainage development impact fees shall be paid at time of building permit issuance. A portion of the drainage impact fee has been paid for the area of the site that is already developed . This application shall be responsible for payment of additional developed area. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits and/or Grading Permit(s). Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new and existing structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Fire walls may be required to separate the exiting trailers form the proposed construction or the trailers may have to be relocated or removed. A fire alarm is required through out the entire facility. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 612812018 E7—E8 Pg30 Page 3 of 11 Project #: DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 2. The subgrade for the permeable paver storm water treatment devices shall have a level subgrade. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a pad elevation for the permeable paver subgrade on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing the permeable paver subgrade as level. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 4. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 5. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 6. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 7. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 9. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 10. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. Printed: 612 812 01 8 www.CityofRC.us E7—E8 Pg31 Page 4 of 11 Project #: • DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grading ROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: I) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 18. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Sapphire Street) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/28/2018 E7—E8 Pg32 Page 5 of 11 Project #: • DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR N St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 20. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 21. The USEPA regulations include the term "common plan of development or sale' to ensure that acreage within a common project does not artificially escape the permit requirements because construction activities are phased, split among smaller parcels, or completed by different phases. In keeping with the intent of this USEPA regulation the applicant as a condition of approval shall be required to submit a final project -specific water quality management plan to the City Engineer, or their designee, prior to the issuance of grading permits and/or building permits. This final project -specific water quality management plan shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 22.A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12 -inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 23. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 24. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 27. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. Printed: 6/28/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 11 E7—E8 Pg33 Project#: • DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 29. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 30. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 32. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 33. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 34. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 35. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/28/2018 E7—E8 Pg34 Page 7 of 11 Project #: - DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR N St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 38. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 39. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm waterdrainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 41. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed: 6/28/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 11 E7—E8 Pg35 Project#: DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: Project Type 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. Section 1.5.1, Table 1-1 Priority Projects, Category No. 1, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans reads "All significant re -development projects — defined as the addition or replacement of 5,000 or more square feet (sq. ft.) of impervious surface on an already developed site subject to discretionary approval of the permitting jurisdiction. In addition: Where re -development results in an increase of 50% or more of the impervious surfaces of a previously existing developed site, the numeric sizing criteria discussed in Section 4 applies to the entire development. The project is showing unknown square feet of existing impervious area on the entitlement submittal dated September 12, 2017. The project is showing 37,717 square feet of proposed and/or removal and replacement of impervious area. The proposed/removal/replacement impervious area equals or exceeds 50% of the existing impervious area, the project is conditioned, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, to prepare a final project -specific water quality management plan to treat the storm water runoff of the entire development's impervious area. 43. The direction of storm water flow flowing across the permeable paver storm water treatment device is a small area compared to the total area of each of the permeable paver locations. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a design which will allow the storm water to evenly flow into the permeable paver gravel base (such as a catch basin with a perforated pipe running under the length of the permeable paver area, or a similar design), and shall show the design on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing how the storm water is evenly distributed into the permeable paver gravel base. Printed: 6/2812018 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 11 E7—E8Pg36 Project #: - DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR /// St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 44. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMF document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal ' Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78) repair or maintenance activities{79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. 45. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 6/28/2018 E7—E8 Pg37 Page 10 of 11 Project #: - DRC2013-00230 DRC2013-00229 Project Name: MDR N St Justina Church Location: 6386 SAPPHIRE ST - 106233225-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 46. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. 47. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable'. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. Printed: 6128/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of i t E7—E8Pg38 REPORT DATE: July 11, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner SI4 . INITIATED BY: Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner 6F SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2018-00387- CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH - A request to modify previously approved Conditional Use Permit 84-37 to allow the construction of a self-service vacuum area with 19 new self-service stalls under an overhead canopy of 4,320 square feet in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet west of Haven at 10340 Foothill Blvd; APN: 1077-401- 48. Related File: Site Development Review DRC2018-00260. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2018-00260- CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH - A request to construct a 4,320 square foot solar canopy structure over a self-service vacuum area with 19 new self-service stalls in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard approximately 1,000 feet west of Haven Avenue at 10340 Foothill Blvd; APN: 1077-401-48. Related File: Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2018-00387. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2018-00387 and Site Development Review ORC2018-00260 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. BACKGROUND: On January 9, 1985, the Planning Commission approved CUP 84-37 to allow the construction and operation of a gasoline dispensary station, an ancillary automotive facility and a 7,500 -square foot car wash (Exhibit E). On July 9, 1997 the Planning Commission approved CUP 97-15 to modify the existing Conditional Use Permit to add a 30 foot by 85 foot oil and lube service building to the existing car wash facility (Exhibit F). On April 14, 2015, the Planning Director approved a Site Development Review application (DRC2015-00366) to install 7 self-service vacuum stalls under an existing canopy. E9-10 Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP MOD DRC2018-00387 AND SDR DRC2018-00360 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 11, 2018 Page 2 SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is within the Community Commercial (CC) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District. The 2.46 -acre project site is located at the northeast corner of Center Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The site is developed with multiple buildings relating to the Deer Creek Car Care Center. A car wash building, car detailing, lube and oil building and three canopies currently exist on the subject property. Services offered include car washes, oil changes, window tint, car detailing and self -serve vacuum stations. Currently, the site has seven self -serve vacuum stations under an existing canopy. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: ANALYSIS: A. General - Site Development Review DRC2018-00260: The applicant proposes to construct a 4,320 -square foot canopy with 19 vacuum hose stations available to car wash customers as a self-service option. A new 216 square foot equipment enclosure is also proposed which will house the new vacuum equipment and dispensing machines. The new stations and equipment enclosure are proposed on the north-west corner of the subject property on an existing parking area and partially unpaved area (Exhibit C). The materials and colors of the proposed canopy and equipment enclosure are consistent with other canopies located on the property. Key features include stucco covered columns supporting the canopy and an equipment enclosure finished with stucco to match the other existing buildings on-site. A painted green band is also proposed on the proposed structures to match the existing buildings on-site. Solar panels are proposed on top of the roof of the canopy as well. The canopy and equipment enclosure comply with the Development Code requirements for building height, setbacks, on-site parking requirements and an efficient on-site circulation system. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00387: The Development Code (RCMC Section 17.16.120.A) identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site_ Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact E9-10 Pg2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Deer Creek Car Wash and _ M Community Commercial Site associated automotive service General Commercial (CC) District, Foothill uses Boulevard Overlay District North Industrial Buildings Industrial Park Industrial Park 1P District Commercial Office (CO) South Vacant Land Mixed Use District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District East Flood Control Channel Flood Control/Utility Flood Control (FC) District Corridor Fonda Don Chon Restaurant West and Parkina Lot Mixed Use Mixed Use (MU) District ANALYSIS: A. General - Site Development Review DRC2018-00260: The applicant proposes to construct a 4,320 -square foot canopy with 19 vacuum hose stations available to car wash customers as a self-service option. A new 216 square foot equipment enclosure is also proposed which will house the new vacuum equipment and dispensing machines. The new stations and equipment enclosure are proposed on the north-west corner of the subject property on an existing parking area and partially unpaved area (Exhibit C). The materials and colors of the proposed canopy and equipment enclosure are consistent with other canopies located on the property. Key features include stucco covered columns supporting the canopy and an equipment enclosure finished with stucco to match the other existing buildings on-site. A painted green band is also proposed on the proposed structures to match the existing buildings on-site. Solar panels are proposed on top of the roof of the canopy as well. The canopy and equipment enclosure comply with the Development Code requirements for building height, setbacks, on-site parking requirements and an efficient on-site circulation system. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00387: The Development Code (RCMC Section 17.16.120.A) identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site_ Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact E9-10 Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP MOD DRC2018-00387 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2018-00260 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 11, 2018 Page 3 on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the proposed Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, car washes are permitted, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Although the property has had several CUPs approved in the past for the operation of the current car wash, the addition of the 19 new vacuum stations is considered an expansion of the use and therefore, a modification of the existing CUP is required. All operations of the car wash, other than the proposed new vacuum stations, would continue as they exist today. No new employees would be required as these are self -serve vacuum stations. The current operational hours are 7:00 am to 7:00 pm every day and revisions to these operating hours are not proposed. Although the operations of the car wash will remain as they are today, there is potential for increased noise impacts. The proposed project's primary source of noise will come from the vacuum system and equipment. Adjacent residential apartment units, which are sensitive receptors, are located approximately 70 feet to the northwest of the project site. Due to the proximity of the residential units, the applicant submitted a noise impact study (prepared by RK Engineering Group, Inc., April 30, 2018) which analyzed the potential noise from the proposed equipment including the self-service vacuum units and vacuum turbines. Section 17.55.050 of the Development Code limits the maximum allowable decibel level to 65dBA when measured at the adjacent residential property line between 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. The analysis assumed that the proposed project would operate from 7:00 am to 10:00 pm on a daily basis. Existing noise levels were measured and noise measurement data indicated that adjacent residential apartment units to the northwest of the project site currently experience noise of 61.5 dBA during daytime hours. The noise experienced comes from the passing traffic and the car wash operations, and varies depending on the time of day and traffic speeds. The noise study took into consideration the total combined exterior noise impacts (all stationary sources running simultaneously including existing ambient noise levels) at the adjacent residential apartment units to the west and projected the maximum noise level to be 61.9 dBA if the proposed equipment was to be installed. Although the project is not expected to create noise levels higher than the maximum 65dBA, to further reduce noise impacts, the noise study recommended that the project incorporate some design features to further limit the noise impact. These features are related to how the equipment enclosure will be constructed. These recommendations have been included as conditions of approval. The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit Modification findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. Fact: Within the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, carwashes and their associated uses are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed self -serve vacuum stations are an addition to an existing car wash facility and were designed to be compatible with all applicable development standards of the Development Code. Furthermore, there are existing self- service vacuuming areas within the car wash facility. E9-10 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP MOD DRC2018-00387 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2018-00260 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 11, 2018 Page 4 Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The project site is currently developed as a car wash land use and remains suitable for a car wash land use and the car wash's associated uses, provides appropriate site access, provides all utility services available, and meets all related performance criteria and development standards for a carwash facility. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: The car wash and proposed self -serve vacuum stations will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located- The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria including noise, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. Urgency Ordinance No. 932: On June 20, 2018, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 932 establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of carwashes within the City. Project applications that had paid application fees prior to the adoption of the Urgency Ordinance were exempted from the exclusions of the moratorium. The moratorium is not applicable to the proposed project as all application fees were paid prior to the moratorium effective date. Parking: The proposed canopy and vacuum stations are proposed in an area that is currently a paved area with 11 parking spaces. Since those parking spaces would no longer be available for customers, other than customers wanting to vacuum their vehicles, these spaces would no longer be included in the overall required parking space count. The table below highlights the amount of parking required for the use and the amount of parking spaces provided. Although the project results in the removal of those 11 parking spaces, the project site will have an excess of 13 parking spaces. Parking Calculation Use Parking Ratio Spaces Re uired Car Wash full service) 16 spaces regardless of size 16 spaces Lube and Oil Building 2 spaces per service bay 6 spaces Office Area 1,275 square feet 1 space for every 250 square feet 5 Total Spaces Re uired 30 spaces Total Spaces Provided 43 spaces B. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The project includes new construction of a canopy structure, vacuum stations and equipment enclosure and will not create any negative E9-10 Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP MOD DRC2018-00387 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2018-00260 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES July 11, 2018 Page 5 impacts on the environment. Furthermore, the applicant has provided a noise study which determined that any noise generated from the new equipment and self -serve vacuum stations would not exceed maximum performance standards for noise as described in the Development Code. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site is currently assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed new development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages sustainability within site design and construction and encourages commercial uses to provide a broad range of services to customers. The solar panels provide a sustainability element to this project and the self-service vacuuming stations provide another option for customers. The project is also in compliance with land and development requirements of the Development Code for the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Map Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Elevations and Roof Plan Exhibit E - Staff Report and Resolution of Approval and Standard Conditions for CUP 84-37 Exhibit F Staff Report and Resolution of Approval and Standard Conditions for CUP 97-15 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2018-00387 Draft Resolution of Approval for Site Development Review DRC2018-00260 E9-10 Pg5 u m a n E `l4 m id afdel'4 c'? P, a+ 1I 7 Q 4 LL J �0� V / N � Cardiff?- �n pv� o < 00 o µ104 a 0 0 O �t i/ �'+ h Gp�� 3 0 aNb ICO P, 00 N _� �' ��° ' w V N V � A�f ,} ❑ Qi �_ � � z EOAA u,)AeH DAV uLIAe}I (U St CL i� O. L 1) PUJQD ldj4fa3 any Idlud,l ,� JA;r JalUa� . 4 0 •r. �, ,. i fl u f �rEPSlCt�V1 '~ ❑ O L aAV 130tu13 j Ifp'1 �asirn _ IL S Q .� �= v � C •o a u a V .a N Ln a any rsotulOH 3 1A14.(qurlg tin C 3 1u13 v7 `O �yy, c (+ Dartmouth Avg- L Ln ArM jeal drhi deal LM 71t4SuO,%aG JC ill ani eu0ulea J(] AA01JIM oli4eaLn tA cs any RKKU a u0puoj Lt', � j JAV 1GAIP`'4 E v a n A. EXHIBIT A E9— 10 yr r any uane anyianeH ' a.. F 0 aF LL 14• ver► *tl` m Y ,. * '. e� `6 4 L�. iL DAV aa1u�)D jdlu,3D 10 LL - Ln c ULM F'1-1 W W E Z co UW � If�Yy .-1 A� 4 W z �aoa O oU W W � e� � w —4 A zz W Q E--4 EXHIBIT C N'dld alIS ?19AOD 8V10S °z ri.l N - �a i t IL CL N I r� st S Aj Sf Ai t7 ,3: $pts i'��` s i Y•p1pN4 4-�q � t 'wi i r it: r?>`i diva N 3145 Ti.r� I , 1 � ` °z ri.l N - �a i t IL CL N I' i�8� a��3 a a 5 Ir t • t r L t� —L,�--=-- -- ' L-� --- j- E9-10 Pg8 -1 Y K 0 JE r-� I' i�8� a��3 a a 5 Ir t • t r L t� —L,�--=-- -- ' L-� --- j- E9-10 Pg8 -1 Y K 0 JE Cu ' ow C LU ! . Nb ld 31 63AQ' a d1Q5 O o Q X �CL LLJ { I EXHIBIT D E9-10 Pg9 N B EXHIBIT D E9-10 Pg9 CD J VI U4 od )991 d ddn. c rn[; Nbld 36S 2 3AOO SVIOS p a O p } oc } X I' cx UsLd E9-10 Pg 10 4 a .1 CITY OF RANCHO CUC ONGA ST"F REPORT DATE: January 9, 1984 TO: Members of the Planning Cotiraissibn FROM: Rick Gomez, City Planner BY: Hwoard L. Fields, Assistant 'Manner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMEnTAL ASSESSMENT AND COOT; 1977 - &tcbtK1 rEuUMMIMP 6'evetopmenz oT a r,auu square foot car wash, gasoline dispensing station and ancillary automotive retail facilities, on'2.5 acres of land located at the northeast corner , of Center Street and Foothill Boulevard in .-the General Commercial (GC) D valopment District - APN I077-401-28 1. PROJECT KNR SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested: Approval of a precise .site plan -and architectural design, and issuance of a Negative Declaration. B. Purpose: Development of a car wash, gasoline dispensing and automotive retail facilities. C. Location: The northeast corner of Center Street and Foothill Boulevard. D. Parcel Size: 2.5 acres E. "Existing 'ening: General Commaricial (GC) F. Existinj Land Use: Existing single family residence G. Surrounding Land 'Use and Zoning: art - Industrial Deve o� pment; Proposed Industrial Arta Specific -Plan South - Vacant, Office/Professional (OP) East - Existing flood Control Channel, Flood Control (FC) West - Existing Family' Restaurant (Socorros), General Commercial {aC) fl. General Plan Desi na'cion s: ro ect it -E. - Commercial North. - 16dustrial South - Office East - Flood Controlilltility Corridor Vest - Commercial ITEM G t XHIBIT E9--14Pg11 i M �y PLANNING'COMMISSI TAFF REPORT Conditional -Use Pe : t 84-37/Keib-art Januafy;9, 1985 Page 2 I. Site Characteristics: At the present time the project site is vacant with the exception of a restored residence to -be removed. Topography is characterized by a gently falling slope of 2% running from north to south The majority of the project - site is covered, with existing vineyards and a cluster of trees at the southwest corner of subject site. The developers 'have indicated that trees unct.;itable for retention shall be removed. II. ANALYSIS: ' A. General: The -',Project proposal represents a diversified car care facility on,k2.5 acres that will service.consumer.needsfor proposed and futgre office/professional development Within.1be immediate area and surrounding coraaunity. The subjent development will consist of two single story+structures, which will contain the retail sales of auto raccessories:�. and -semi- enclosed wax/polish detail area. In addition, three overhead canopy structures will house a -vacuum area, a self-servict:,'and- a full --service gasoline di'spensing facility. Two access points' are being, proposed for the priject, both access points will be 'located on Center Street with no access' being taken off of Foothill -,Boulevard. On-site circulation provides adequate room for stacking -of autos and efficient flow during pack Aeriods. Furthermore; an adequate number of parking spaces has been propased in such a manner as -to reduce circulation conflicts. B. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee discussed at length compatli i ity/appropriateness of the proposed architectural design in relation to the surrounding area. The members' comments ranged between an acceptance .of the basic design concept to a desire' to have'.the' architectural forru and materials 2 completely redesigned to reflect 'more of the Virginia Dare misson-style architectural design. Ttre members felt that since there was no consensus regarding the architectural -design/form . or the proper use of materials that the project should be brought before. the full Planning Con,nission for guidance and determination. It .necessary, ther4'ore, for - the members -of the Cormission to . review in. detail the architectural elevations, as well as the colors avid materials, and determine their appropriateness is relation to. the type of development and the location of the site. C. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review ;Cornnittee has N7,iewe the project and has favorably recommended its eppl,oval. The Committee has reopested-that -sped -ific .conditions be Paced on the project to insure coholiaace''with- the,{codes and star;dards of the City. These conditions have been Iricluded on the Resolution for the Commission's consideration. E9-10 Pg 12 4 I -t V. 4 ' V RECOMMENDATION: SWUld the Planning Con stion • PLANNING COW I IISSI%TAFF REPORT- T_ architectura elevations, Conditional.",Use:'- Pe t.84-37/Kelhert- January 901.1085. ahe appropri fe action would Page 3: V?� project ..through the attached Resolution and issue a Negative Declaration. D. Grading 'Committeei ..The Grading Committee has -recoffenended. approval OfLCUP U47 s6jqct to special condition's relative' to drain - and finalIzation of the G'radihgan. Age Should the PlanniAg 09*0:900n: find -the submitted architecturalelevations,. E. 6virbnmental ttud':-- Part I- of. the- initial, study, as completed building _ By7e. appIcant is providd: -forypUr-. retiew and unacceptable;, then Staff -has - - completed Part , 11 .of the consideration. CIS staff. requesti­that nm4ntal cheiklist-and found' no sign if idant, adverse impact environmental be given to the on' ,:the ehAronmerkt 'Ai ii- result of this project. If'' the applicantt-ih .order to- Coi3;miss'oh'-.cbACUr.s. 'ill'th-- said findings, then -issuance ',-,f a - revisions -and that I Negat'Ive Declaration would be in order. M. FACTS -FQR'F.INDIf4G9'-.- The ."'project. is consis tp ,fit' with the General ai.Plan and Development Code. - The 'project will slot be detrimental to gnificant adverse environmental adjacent pr6�ertles -&':c'ause s -i' impacts.. ".1fi addition' the: -ftopqsed use -and site plan, together with :the rediftfiended conditions of approval are in compliance with f. the applica islons -of the Development Code and. City ' file proy Standards.. -'Commission must find, that the proposed building design it consistent with. the 'Develo mdnt Code policies 'Development regarding harmonious buil.di.Og ddflgo, -form, materials and color. IV. CORRESPONDENCE-. This item .has. been advertised in The bally Report as a pubife hearing. In addition] 'ihe. property was posted and notices w6re sent- U ail - pHperty , owqrt within 30D feet of the Ik. project site advertising the p4blidl hearing. To date, no correspondence has beeh received �egard Ing the project. V. 4 ' V RECOMMENDATION: SWUld the Planning Con stion find the submitted J, T_ architectura elevations, building niTiterials, and site plan acceptable, then- t ahe appropri fe action would beto. approve the project ..through the attached Resolution and issue a Negative Declaration. Should the PlanniAg 09*0:900n: find -the submitted architecturalelevations,. building -materials 'or site -plan unacceptable;, then staff. requesti­that guida"dia and direction be given to the applicantt-ih .order to- facilitate the necessary . - revisions -and that I R., the project-be-continuede 9 0 E9 -•1U Pg 1'3 PLANNING3 0101ISSI TA['F. REPORT Canditionpl Use Pe' t 8437/Kelbert -�, 'danuary 9, 1985. F �.� Page 4' IT . . Att�chmepts-. Exhibit Location Map ,Exhibit. "V, Site .PIan ExhIjbit Phu' — Grading Plan x' 'Exhibit' 411- —Building elevations i r y:•', Exhibit. AER Exhibit !IF" .- larld9c4pe, Plan ; Initial Study,, -Part. TI r. r. .'Res,)lution o -App-' ';.1 's E9-70 Pg14 , FC GC 4! Iff1392®1mmolo®® s .�.,� Future City Hall FC MH it LI'S'pe �. M i NORTH MANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SGA LC: E9-10 Pg15 .� ` 0it , AwNX M Y (uf't � ` � x r • . � f�• 4 E9710 Pg1.7 9� 1! E9-1.0 Pg 19 � tir ' ;a ell Frl,ww�w��wt ..�_ ...-.�� �..�.-. r+.._ • '}+ - .h.�rr�� v Nit ---woe r.,.r��.ar� �4�r. F+��+..:��.T.��+,_.•+_+rte '�+.w,.-...aw t.+ �r.+.a.+.�.rwa`w.-��.. �_.-.. � _� k������ F _rrF�r��w_�wt�.3� ♦..,+. .+'moi .:�f ��. •+•++y .+�rt���__a-1:�..^..�� �� _...'•._+!• ,'�5 .. ��__. w..,. .+ .r - � Jr � r.--J� .a tt+._` � -- _ .a x `� • •�S *� �. •'. - _ 1 ++ ... _`,y ..+ti1 - ,may. �ar.�r �� .�_ .'� 5 r. _ _ • • w , "11 4.., r ,.w� .. + _ .�., ��-�... .... �,�_� _. .,f-r. .-« •=�ta•:a�:1. .fs„ - �. . raca..� - `fi� : � ` � `� „,,--�JJ r• ��"+ i���- i * +Try„ ' • F yawti.lry X-�''_"•+.rt `. .rt. _.i..� .� G— I O Pg l DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS t: Linde 7:00 - 7:30 November.29, 1984 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-37 - iCELBERT PARTNERSHI - Development of a :500 sq. ft. ;: wash, a gasoline dispen'sing station, and ancillary automotive facilities on 2.5 acres of land located at the northeast corn er of Center. Avenue and. Foothill. Boulevard in the General Comrearcial (GC) Development District - APN 1077-401-28. Design Parameiters it This project is on the north side of Foothill Boulevard in the General i, Commercial District and is in proximity to both the Virginia Dare development and Haven Avenue. The uses proposed are those which are condi'_io.ia[ly permited in the development district. t` Due to the project being ort-a•Special Boulevard, as well as relatively near an historical landmark and promifient davelQpments, there is a tN strong need to insure architectural compatibility an..4 a high quality of design, materials and general appearance fr6m, the street. ` Staff Ccmients Site Plan: The site plan issues relate to what is the overall street scene€rom both Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue. Concern relates 4 to both adequate screening of cars utilizing the site as well as the overall archite utra7 design. The following revisions are suggested: I. The site should be dropped in grade so that the cars are adequiz ely screened frau the street through the use of . the proposed screen walls. Z. The appropriateness of the location. of the gasoline station facing Center Avenue is of cdncern. It may be desirable to v, locate the station to an area which is �µ mors: inward of time site. Architectura:. In keeping with the nearby notable historic structures and the nua for articulate architectural design on Foothill Boulevard, 4' the following revisions are suggested: ' 1. The Foothill Boulevard building. elevations as well as the architectural design of the asci l l- 1!y automotive.facilities, should reflect more -of the architectural style associated with the Virginia Dare Commercial Center. Tl' a building mater -t1s and colors should also preR�ent mare of a rustic character and be of higher -_ quality material, as well as be mDre compatible with the _ building farm, E9 -10P922 Z.� ril FI,t $t 4b . Lf Design Review Commeats CUP",84-'37 - Kelbert Partnership November 29, 3984 } Page -2 2. P.6 signs areapproved at this time. A formal sign program shall .be submitted at a later date. Landscaping: The landscaping..for the site will be F;. -maior ~ ' influence in that, screening .and. enhancement of the development. The following revisions are suggested: 1. Rdditioilail landscaping area should be provided along the Florid Contral Chanrel in order to i^rreate the amount of sciEeaning from Foot -hill Boule;. rd. 2. Specimen size trees will be needed along, Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue in order to: enhance the architecture e.'td screen -the cars frau the street. 3. Berming along hot:, -Foothill, Boulevard and Center Avenue should blend with ►;oth,the terrain and the building. Circulation: The site's present circulatlion system appears workable. Relocation of the gasoline dispensing area may affect: the circulation pattern and require modifibations. Design Review Committee fiction Members Present: 'Herman Rempel, tarry McHiel, Rich Goxiaz Staff Planner: Linda D. Daniels site PU I The site should be dropped in grade so that the cars can be adequately s-reened from Foothill Boulevard 'and Center Avenue.' If dropping the grade cannot be done, they, the proposed screen walls should be increased in height. In either case, the goal is to reduce the visibility and line of site of the drying vehicles from Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue. Archi teti t - .,e The Design Review Committee members could. -not come. to a cannon consensus on the adequacy of the 'proposed architectural design.' The members$ comments ranged between an acceptance of the basirlesign concept to d desire to have the architectural' form and materials be completely redesigned to reflect more of the Virginia Dare ar`:l'tectural design. F9-10 Pg23 A* ` y '. Design Review Comments�- f CUP 84.37 - !.elbert Plknership ' November 29, 1984 Page 3 The members. Felt that since= there .was no common opinion. regarding 'the � architectural -des- gn/farm or - the proper,' 'use of ma eirfals that tine i project - should be brought Wore ' the Plaonirig - Commission- for- detetminat.i on. ' Landscaping 1. AdIditional.landscaping, or a coribination of }ardscape and f ` ­'L'',ldseaping, shall be provided along the. Flood Control { Channal in order to increase'the amount.of srrecning frog+. ' - Fcathill Sbulevard• = `°- �. 2 Spec imen,--sUe_jreg5 wiTI be. needed tjong Foothill Boulevard: t% nd, Center' ° AverGa in - or'de'r to. enhance the arch i teetur.�. • 3.: Beining along both foothill Boul6ard and' Center Avenue. should b12iid and enhance the buildings 'vertica'l. form.` . The berming should-be that of rolling terkin along both Foothill BouTevard aqd Center kdnae.: The landscape setback along the north proporty line shall 'be increased to a mii:imum of 15 feet. Signs ; - �' t 1. No signs are approved at 'Ime. A Formal sign tF. program.,sha11 be submitted a ;�4 later date;'for approval. _ `gip �• _ .i l( i`t _ r� jy A. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS Lind"' 7:01 - 7:30 November 29, 1984 -----uup Q '.1 s4.wv' zoo 3, La Cdr ufdsn, a. gasojine - . dispensing• statio: , and ancillary autorhotive facilities -ori 2.5 acres of land .located' at. the-. northeast corner of Center Avenue '.and Foothill Boulevard in' the' General Commercial (GC) Development District - APN 1077-40128. Design Parameters This project is on 'the north side of Poithill Boulevard in the General Commercial District --and-Ar-r'' in proximity to both the, Virginia Dare _ development- and. llav5ti• Avenue. The uses' Proposed are those which are conditionally-_.perm;ted14--the development district. Due to the project being ori' a Special Boulevard, as well as relatively near an historical. 1-a6dmark and prominent developments, there is a strong need to insure architectural compatibility and a high quality of design, materials and general appearance from the street. Staff Co, ments Site Plan: The site plan issues relate to what is the overall street scene from both Foothill' Boul3vard and Center ,Avenue. Concern relates to both adequate- screening' of cars utilizing the site as well as the overall architecutral design. The following revisions are suggested: Z. The site should be-dropprd in grade so that the cars are adequately screened frog! the street through the use' of the proposed srreen.wells. 2. The appropriateness of ..the location of the, gasoline station facing Center Avenue is of concern. It may be desirable to .relocate- the station to an area which is .more inward of the' site. Architecture:' In keeping with the nearby notable historic structures and the need for articulate-architecturaldesign on Foothill boulevard, the following revisions are suggested., - '!. The Foothill Boulevard building elevation, as well as the architectural design of the ancillary automotive facilities,- should - reflect more of the architectural style associated' with the Virginia Dare Commercial Center.• The building materials and colors should also present more of .1 rustic character and be of, higher quality matei tial,, as Well as be more compatible with the building fd'-m. • E9-10.Pg25 � I1 Design Review Continents CUP 84-37 - Kelbert Partnership November -29, 1984 Pace 2 2. No- signs ve approved at this time. A formal sign prograw shall be submitted at a later date. Landscaping: The landscaping for the site will be a major influence in the screening and enhancement of the development. The following revisions are suggested,' 1. Additional landscaping area,should be provided along the Flood Control Channel in order to. increase the amount of screening from-F.00thill Bouleva-d. 2. Specimen 'size trues will be needed along Foothill Boulevard and Conte` Avenue in order to enhance the architecture and screen' -the cars from the street. 3. Berming along both `Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue should blend with both the teti•rain and the building.. Circulation: The site's prasent circulation system appears workable. Relocation of the gasoline dispensing area may affect the circulation pattern and require modifications. Design Review Committee Action Members Present: Herman Resnpel, Larry McNiel, Mick Gomez Staff Planner: Linda D. Daniels 4 Site'Plan The site. should be dropped 'in grade so that the cars can be adequately_ .screened. from Foothi 11. Boulevard and Center Avenue. If dropping the. ' grade cannot be done, then the proposed screen walls should -be increased in height. In either. case, the goal is to reduce the Visibility 'and line of site of the drying. vehicles from Foothill Boulevard and 'Center. I Avenue. _ Architecture The Design Review Committee members could not. come to a ccmmon consensus on the adequacy of the proppsed architectural design.. The members' ` continents ranged between an acceptance of the basic detign .cbncept to a . , desire to Save the architectural form and materials' 'be completely redesigned to reflect, m4rz of the Virginia Dare.drehitecturaT design: E9-10 Pg26 f'� � : ���..�� . , �,� .. S, " 135• '; I S, pes i gn Review Comments `CUP 84.37 - Kelbert; partnership ' Hevfmber 29, 1984."� Page 3 , f ' M1 the members felt that since there was no Ommon opipion regarding the architectural design/form or the proper use of materials that. the Project should be brought before the Planning - Commission for ...+. determinatjon. Landsca inO r 1. Additional landscapir:g, or. a combination of hardscape and Landscaping, shall be provided along the Plood Control Channel in order to increase the amount of-'screening from Foothill Boulevard.; 2. Specimen size 'trees will be needed along Foothill Boulevard and 'Center Avenue in order to enhance the architecture. ` 3. Berming along .both Foothill BouleVard and Center Atanue r. should blend ,and enhance the .buildings vertical form. The berniing should be that of rolling terrain along both .. Foothill BouleVdrd and -Center Avenue. 4. The landscape ,setback along the north property line shall be increased td' a. minimum of 15 feet.- eet.-Signs Signs 1. No signs are approved at this time A formal' sign program shall be submitted at-a later date for approval. t �r t, - - I k; iy. �s. r- FI_ f� ter_`? it �� �i`i`�• t'. A RESOLUTION NO. 85-04 A 4tESOLUTION OF "E RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING' COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITfORAL USE PERMIT NO. 84-37 FOR 'DEVELOPMENT -OFA 7;1,:00 SQU,1RE FOOT CAR WASH, GASOLINE DISPENSING STATION AND ANCILLARY AUTOMOTIVE RETAIL FACILITY LOCATED ON THE NORTREAST CORNER OF CENTER STREET AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE GFNERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, on the 7th day of November, 1964, a complete application was filed by Kelbert Partnership for review o -f the above-described project; and WHEREAS, on the 9t1i day of J.,nuary, '1985, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a public heaefgg to consider• the above-described project- follows: roject- fol4ows: ti NOW, THEREFORE, the Rancho Cucamolga Planning Com►nission rosoived as SECTION 1: That the -following fincline,s can be met:. 1. That the proposed uqe is iA ac:.ord with. the General Plan, the objectives of tbe, D`01opment Code, and the purposes of the district, iv which the site -is located. 2. That the proposed uso, together vjjth the conditions applicable thereto, Will. not be - =etrimental to the public health, safety, oi� welfor,e, or material .v; injurious to properties or improvements in th'e viclnity. - 3. That the proposed E'sii complies with each of the applicable provisions df the Develop4%nt Code. SECTAON 2: - That this projer.t will not cftafi� adverse impacts on Ithe ' en-,ir�nment acid that a Negative Declaration is issued on January 9, 1985. SECTION 3: That CwiditiS)nal Use Permi'} No. 84-37 is approvedil subject to the following conditidns: PLANNING DIVISION I..- Additional landscaping dr. a corhination of hardscar& and -landscaping, shall be providyd along, i:hp Flood Control Channel in order to increase the''i.amount of screening `from Foothill Boulevard. also, the l,andsc,aping' setback alone the -north property line shall be istcreased to a minimum of 15 f- t.'s't . tti F E9-10 Pg28 ` r I Rte! J 4 t; r 4'. =.r b, b M Resolution No. 85-04 Page 2 0 Z. Either a Demolition Permit or Relocation Permit shall be obtained from the- Building and Safety Division prior to removal of existing single family residence. 3. The applicant shali provide texturized paving treatment as indicated on the site plan. 4, The project shall accept drainage flows from the area to the north and provide a proper system to convey said flows through the site to an approved outlet facility or an alternate system shall be provided as.approved by the City Engineer. S. The building materials shall be restudied and resubmitted to the Design Review Committee for approval. 6. The final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the4 Design Review Committee: The landscape plan shall include trees which will provide additional screening and contoured berming along Foothill Boulevard and Center Avenue. ENGINEERING 1. Depending upon the results of the required drainage study and the requirements of Caltrans (Foothill Boulevard being a State Highway), a storm drain from Center Avenue to Deer Creek Channel may be required for the project. 2. Approval from Caltrans will be required for all.work within Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. 3. Approval from the San Bernardino .County. Flood Control District will be required for all .work within its right-of-way, including connections to Deer Creek Channel, landscaping, and alternations to their access road, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9th Gr OF JANUARY, 1985. PLAt COMMfSSION OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA Dennis L. Stout, Chairnan 4 `' E9 -i0 Pg 29 RfzSlution No. 85-0 +Page 3 4 J IIII � `rt 1Y'~ A • _ w, ATTEST: ., R.ic G Reputy Secretary r .�. s I, Rickb-amonga, omez, ' Deputy. Secretary of'�Ihe , Planning Commission of the City 'of Rancho do hereby certify thatthe foregoicsgResolution was ugly acid �• regularly introduced, passed, and adorned by the Planning Commission of tie S fi City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular':meetipg of the Planning Commission held `fr ori the 9th day of January, 1955, iby thO following vote -to -wit: r. 7 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: - REMPEL, MCNIEL, BARKER, CHITIEA, STOUT HERS: NOW., } BIERS: NOW, E9-10-RgM r Yl 47 r - - r - a E9-10-RgM 47 r - - r - a a ;, �.. scL7 a,arMLN v 913Y Yar V fj Y Y 9rrT \ati L`' NS74. + N 7 C N .rYn O r• U L 6~ r � p R L T Y .0. A Y a r �..r r -0:; r du L Ma�V^U OEL V•n Nri OiT N—�? i�aaw LOwo }•p..y 1' Z hN a 6J r -..a air Q. _V U {y] M [! G O YY Or Oa ue L r.; Q. 1.r A rn• 9 N K Y p„?1 Q µ wn c Y ar C CLI O •.• q .i.� O Y ll�Y r `a• c b �I O L 4t VRI R. r A .5.. q d q} O x r O q IJ A o c c' , uL. nb" ,0 2 -b -2 Rte` as Q d RE t-4 C L O o w •f7 aaa.l Ly0 a1L M L�L4�c OA�„13y y_Gp i.r •.,rC► 10r pMq —gYL.r^U gepe Rgl�iaO V iJ Au Y M C^Ga•V Vyl w •rr N 3 4w.{C C V ^ p a r O r r C rx y V L L R: 4 `1 r•,`r O r `^ Of L 6' Qs -M L Y L O. �a b n C LA OL• O.� vu%40, �1 }C VLG ^^yyii uy YNC7V • zT N ar 'ab a Y O rr7ut NYr L Y�•y c Y L V ti -M L L u Y EL V 0 EI N L ap iA N pp C L= O a ?pp 9 C3 rr.. w+•r "• 4 IM.2 Y 7 M a• Cil C S—Z; '"s �L M L P•�� '^ y } ft it—U�y "u yea Lo M.6 e a Atl .6112 RL11.ii, N 7 pp 52JCrL } .E L A u N 'O F !.r �L ,p Cb 7r Cr.�7 tLJ �M OGdE1 Y� �9W COL q'•T_N O L pr @ A rM— V o. v o Gyve O Aw L 0. d Nr =u L' 'ow.Niy ^_� rCp urtO/L rY M a. 0 TS [J V C r••{. alu } L..Yapo �...V� O ti • r0 CrHC 9O iC 4qu ECyr+yT.� q.G C ` �,v gtl tea• L�'L+•r =Aq CON O S L�.. 5p Y LJN { Y xr Q r y'^1 {'�• ,+� Y V LC L` N M " Vp N Y V w g Y o N c++ q LYY ?.vLL iLwyr4 rup o"�CM �L..N. a�47r OS,Ca=�yNr'd ,4 '^yN �• CI C+a}b 7A N M vEr k'�o'gg. L'LCo¢tl,c ....—More �r.� .=ew 'O^•�a r -^f„ ��rr Y�d R`�'•'•br `pA Y.O y,RV1L �M4 b_?C N b.0 'CLN ��M Fa0 pC�F AIiCa Cpr�' L -r" V � O♦t dd"C• V Y C.rN N d N A � Cisa4Q •+iC O OOro�M RN — C N'M p`arNQ�p7N�4Ei }Y9U NpC ��C�+Y 7V�1C L,N� aep• OI �'�V�1 � 6r.0 ,C N Vyy a•s b C'YA� A p?r.4. L 46b 6 N Q �� -6 C.,..` �M j A c T O ..1 V 0^•r •t N� A �. 9 L N PIu +,,, ar L i M as N as � � QJ 0.r ¢ 5 L "^ o y V •- Y r %a V R CLQ CC'+• N ^ 1-: L A WM�N L'a S:•_p A4CI a•++ R� :,U%gu �iy�c� 4C1IO +.1 ^1b qr• Oq,,, � •y r' ¢S1 L. ~ ^i View T—O 4> •p Y -Z- E �Ey g t%M � z-6 r��au 0I a�OC�'l7 Ir CIUL 11 34 ECIC •7 V.� V 4 d �� N; G q " N R C O? Y V'•C { avi�r t'Mar rO. r v MO Cc C~6 q 4 • L4r%uo �Y.�J� -� ,rdCYA a++� �Y cpR`} Nugz: �bfU aLY oN,1s w5J •O jr1i c" N—rr.C�. Y—R NVp 4Y TSS— a�r uL/ 2}rvL h:I !_b— allO 1 `Urwr '`l� •Y Cy U N U c } N A 7 C Y ^ L N U LI = L N N� Y4T 7rr L G 6 GG C�� ar fir' C bar 4Y Y Q ab OCaA rFir sY VM �rw Y+r Y $O ft in r.r Y L ML. CLU 4q O,Z%} } U Y \\ O u c"I_ S4.4 .0 .0 a 1 IP • L^^r U L R • . y0. Oq Nb c aA ONErr O LC�� nT VT � ►. n — Y M =C2— ,, n Y d Ga9 a i b 2 � r+yNr 1 U•��— ^CJ u c 4 S;O c Ac r^4e OU O1 N 1 J �•T�.O .. V� Cy a'm �ak'au��:oL CO r O � � N QR C flNGGR LO�4t } Y d NJ q ary T i -4 Vu OV L�Lccr�Nan}O L lu Ca �aw:r«sp - L CL R E1 p a yr•�"r IRS.rc.. R a^ RR`- R A N t � � i W N� p O h�aaOM� a•+ L�i.rn V f MZ C A •ip n- C b D a p u Q N C 7 O U.0 'y LU Y CCCS L p N a cr CA C V M6 LM L U? as N N4M�aW C } eI r W A W N !! o rl • �4. Sao � o � r •"I s M � O b � d ` 9 L"'. 4 Wc "+ car q Fr cr N VI a. o� = C6 W L d Y lr J 4 r Qr•+ if 161 r 0 _ O _ n " N C ..J F^ <tT .ice r i r _ a � u c"I_ S4.4 .0 .0 a rya u 24 S-2 IP L^^r U L R • . y0. Oq Nb c aA ONErr O LC�� nT VT v Aq�^ M =C2— ,, n Y d Ga9 a i b 2 � r+yNr 1 U•��— ^CJ uNr 4 S;O c Ac r^4e OU O1 N 0 KG L c,,r N �•T�.O .. V� Cy a'm �ak'au��:oL CO ~Mn �'ar x r Y r Uqa QR C flNGGR LO�4t } Y d NJ q ary T i -4 Vu OV L�Lccr�Nan}O L lu Ca �aw:r«sp - L CL R E1 p a yr•�"r IRS.rc.. R a^ RR`- R A N t � � i W N� p O h�aaOM� a•+ L�i.rn V f MZ ���s g1rEy GA r$ LC n- C b D a p u Q N C 7 O U.0 'y 6U i R C .Oi 11 vp NCr rj C u JrrJ RI Y Y cr CA C V M6 LM L U? as N N4M�aW C E9-10 Pg31 ti} "' A4.^ - T rn G 4^ +#�1pYCC�ai 01''..a Laad dL p 1•La -Ud {`7,Ilk aa C_�d$ ++C qY t A c d A dos Liu W9 rI• Cqr,•� M`d�LgG.G..�6 i `.-�„"'L pya a `N,•, ' �� h 4 ..q. N.C.. ., Itla�Ll �I•�. •• p q q V ? 4 h N C•iCi q A r Z. q N = • , _ Iz rN. di L � 7I � • C C./ L M � wr` a C C _ f{,L �' A r0 ar1 NL d.i r0 _r rY N aTl Lrn L v q q q 21 Q dam Nrd OUA4'.P dM r " [Y C 6# #• LV L Cy 7« L N d C Y# • C 0.y p A p D C A tl C. a r•. Ir _ `^ as q q aJ C d r;p Q 4- n a V N T A 3 S R wE C2 at L •J'� fr.. ~ C t CL is I••• �ir, '� =; =- rj Lara= ; u ML y= b�ppL+•� wN o Lr R 2-2. ':- 3 'r'• 0, IU L. Ra 0- q. ,La ,•-10. L qy CFI tlQN CA dr !,. Gspy t.'1- fj d Tc•- vaa 'r7 pNyL sw�� qLr � .cG �r. \ _' _d "••q..y1ANIy.C• r.r,•,,^.••Yd-•- +�iVM1 07x`•CJ 0. L LTepIL k'i oL �i�s wf',k M dcp T...aL 1Lt1✓�Cp dN�rg4T L'd=(1 d r C EN74 ��+# 1^t•l raw ^J E i L N OA F+r O'wp�. fir. C C�•S. ' V i D ��.. =9 N d G L' N 1. a tl V •• 4a. M r& } Ned Q b UA -= d7N rya'1 +Z-.!ETr QLIL Nd V L. _ ry 4 Wn-. Cl r^• ' L J d L d' iJC G d'?IC dr 4 L w a C' L 1 dC�rod mo 0---. Clr �a lyYnu6C ily� IYiI •+ �_S! iV q $ _ L�rC7V w�CaNiA p�w�N tcf= wdN y rFrN ri..a r., rl I _ N-0 G.w UUC7 .d L7 �q� Y4}r NVrOy .rvy� p O L N Z V d N C L • N 4 L = 4 C r a r q r••• 6. N w V d N y d �1 r1- C r+ro q 6 a+a p^-w ry-.'� Oy/,9•.D, a w e d q N q a••• d Y v w Y y� a C `r'7 V d „� N •� vl q •- V g G p a+ p v q CI t7 NL Lam! 4 �- •a D •� �Y� --o- p L.p rn_ Y ar NCL �GGsjr Nqr dd4tlr•71-vy� eLj7M-dN^gip yr 4lQ rnY Qr 4.y6N CMv N �9 N nlr•-� y pYG^ i CY 4 y - y ti a N L �'p 6 G q qM adi C aC ar rjL N2.20 V t\ G O 9p i '1+• CV_ N^ L p�u�• x c �M A L�'�� N� CI q 4 d L'p p Ri'1 •'-� [ qY N V C V V C '�9 ai d N N 7 aO a ft N .! U- 7 Sp O rap w c 7 r JC C{ UVY '�` L.aLw 4 LLJN M Kd G tly,l �L „d• y OC+. VEG Aci UwTN�O Lin �Df CGIN p9p VLyq rna ax NC OL •"y ALm dTa•Vi aV.C'a yNV'p 00 on. . LU Lr� yL LQA Ai.��uV. tt• a E dp"' LO'r+r 162 ++-0uada ADL kSLrL '•a QTi #6 7Sc Lr G SL u C•p CC p u.0 tlL 4tl u+ Lp;d V V `c �CF'J w• .�- >Z N v V •- VI r N N L d L# U d IQr N N d r CL W �. r� q d31 a 0 ^ Q� ~•G '••' V • ~t � a Ia 1 f e y - c _ r {.IZ 1Yi �cac r.a'Ji^ C c ocGNjuCpV'� ~LCL-� pr u=a ��dCti -. C .-• N q L t„ 0.Ci C .• L .+ r L a.l +_ a r = w j• p� tz tl •7 q D k t-4. :''C Q. ! go: qt ,C Nr a N Lf x.-• \t{`rFy'�{ci � LWq rNU -0q}IYY�C^MktlL LNPN.irCG! NGdC roR. r7Y dOrq•e•'L=L`rCa rT•� MaLCyLj L' s C -0tlI a 3Odcir- } U UaCuO}O .-V lJ .p "Q`rwrD . Yrly V N t'at.-0 I�qa c �q uLULg2 aL 2� v 3�. as J L f a KICp j0. CC1r d•Q +'fg 0•10, �N vCL `I;ai r.+� �, • -At�w Lrr.. SE10_NL b� Co Urb 19 � •C N` 4 C7 L o r- C F L.'b u' ; is --z' .O p q D V L - q E V 4 CIr ZT DyCr LY �^'Q NN aC NAV K R Com} L .d,. r Ly NLN VrNVvV N --^,A GC CDC Q �� U�p rrnd r yry ,r.0 +•.0 q.... •-•. �_� �ry lsL Waw' � y~7 � �` aC1� aV a.V•. C� �SC,�?NVC N. Id..}amu et q..N.VN gtdN rnq /vw G A•+ L.D C Ji C .7.b u L ''• L r� uDV W4 to Lri ex •d-O'c w•+Cr •G•d1` YwGF6.L Q1rw6 Us �.o •L r a a1 F'y crpy q qT ti y a Nig c�44 L q NLy NGp sm. Cd �C^•rQ•3 w •4 Cti..=. w di NL' r qr "QNG u,da R7-U1tlitlAUL Jp rC.tv4 vory` Nr+ A_ Mr. N �• 4 '� rX qQA C.vA �Vri �G _L_x Cab..l Y•T.�p+} ..c t4 T< vNCL� 7% C. _ v W ti„ .2- C qC � u 17 0 G V r - d p rb Y y � O� N� r� ^ q Q ,q,y _ S IY 6r ,,, ? U a� a Z r L T"a W 4 -.oc Y as d a J:� o y 0. L w� A u C Z �� C.7JL raJp 6S1�r• �a uatll'��Np SNY0.�p �xCLo KNraw �'.•. uo� T,aa s.u•Q .0 ���cV-'t.�p L-'`npor btlnvd qEa .Y+}drn Lar A Cgru!•Ma-L grOr-0 ytlILC NN1�C] q� Ly+ NN L6 L q tl C L CIS C N wY LSC =.`.w Q T L O L•' � C v tl D U d rn ' C M_ v' V w c Arr/��.�gp3 Cl dlp t7G f+ C-0N L Fv. C rn �.v a L d G C C } i C Tr=-.'4 =CIC N m f car 1 LL br Aq Y n.e +3^rq C qr...r- o6.f i 'Et_ 'VV= m r Z7arV .r,->v L+� ivrptl� 'iy G� Cr g 9 aL �� A.Cz Z O C ry +T ` C U S- Cn C �4� n� • 1•�� L V =� 7g� �� Na! G y Y'r.P^' p.% Ua !S' L V C ti N 7•a C 1. �� CL E� C p JI C �� prot_J ` LV'1 • YF O N NAV N M Q 9= gljW E LTJ .N STJ rn •r� v�.ti uON = OV A E y9 CU 9 dp 9.-A�.. .N.. C ON zQI-�:L" +t.' VL'i aNaC D qV :a, L. V, S C rGtrC C n•^Q _ gLfl OL. E�CI pf CC ) C '0 o,--- C�[I pCQ Nr�i r' CI�7_•�il� S9 q G •-r Nr C� C. Ofr d L- d L 5 A _ '—.2' } w _C b 1 V U _� R a Q q d V q V y Cl n7 Lr�T �uLG Lp IO gOra NCA u���Q Li •�� Nif Lt aotn tx 1rrSY k 0. rL NG ^�^Nd r V•D /R- pL UL LtAl� LV Y CaCSLUN oV 4w£ T �� C� A kJ7q V wry GC14 �^• LrGD GN y' >=p,r G - a—i-. rr.#cNL7 1-a.rq¢.Ipa C.Lwa.G �9-10 Pg32 y i f�Cf �i ti 5 ;lt 4 t In QC CCLIGS—9�ay.-r C Y EsLdd I C�Oq C ��QG �>J„Sld T e c .7 UnL .6 m d Q:S �� V Q = _8ao—_ t1ry 41 PI LU NX m++M. u vm~L—.-•tiCJ�'ly Cu:Y IT =NC_L d \p�W nsc: q L/ y M y Y b W L -¢ V a+ 4. �' N '00/ L CA �•,� d C, y Gti tl C N rd C� y� M— L p... Cb q 7 Q V d 17 Ing O Ca = G N�} 6 r:3 1a y,o�M �cbs• Y +' c q Npl aLR.LaNi y �p�uL...V a.d.. a10 b'7a7y'C Cw mR L 'e r'Lc .1 V LaTI N fpra' v - m— 5 -7; 1;1 d?{ -E, DC Nd V N L +1 W L..G.r-O- L 5 O pY a ua m u 7 m 'tL1 UN R C CI +p• � �C d N�6.1 6r L� L— L y • V „�' r u m= C^ m ;-z5 Q n N } C y O LPy y9 rL.l�i+ m C my G� M d pies Q C = '~ NN S{ '"'u CA r��i r m V Q q i P +C• D N a...9M�b� Olgp iN tfd NMpI^ S L6 p RC1 'aJ4 C A IA CI ez ^� ",r —,O a 17 — L V C H q o f IL7 IJ L, m.y q 19 d {J +/ ub G r" q �G C Y Com. L7 a L O m'tl {dla .�_ ZMd CMV V N Ec p 4� C i'.COyN O� Gy—Cq qC V^g{ pI V V li{ Q y Ly LC.rM mal C� "a A5NAeU armL+ QN >, 'C N oC 41`.7:0 —,2 cm GML 41 V 7 GmF. V Je r R y0�j• ?. {[I. pI N C Y�Z � Y% �� "m a qr ^_ r C d 9y NL V JY. CI N RLO"•�apl rRRaK1 �y m TPd7' ��y{k �. a V V q Y CI ICO N�'IA S N L m„C., n Y L V v,r 0-roj ..[ a Q r qI d L C 4 GLS CA w x LN.p+ v Nd �dq,G .�•. 1-c C N p, 1^Nr p'�^ :,• P.P'S 22 'u =G CpI4+` R��GC qG w+0L~ er,=�nN. .0 u U .a �a-mr 's,R-yQin.- C Q a L1y N a+ N O d -M L Q P � 4 N N R o m N R ►1 YNCr/ YrO qu Y-N� UL ;� d "Co }.qr 9S Ga N p Y 9 MC V CJZp p a V 01 .00 P41, -0 &Z .0 p! 'LY yl Y C 1J I S L•. L r1 G _U L.N C L- q _ 10 gGP.o-. mOOY' AVL. rc C3.• dsd .Cifi'�C' N E ..L. dS-7 q0 N �1d C a 6 1.. ,� 4 Qm IJ IA U. SC1�POp 0.��10 7G L.O'�` CNV Yv .,C* N LI 17NGC0 .Q•. u'! G _ L' a1 p q pl m N C C pl C C C Cf— N L N IV— ; m� q.S P� �'I GuM O"1 O O,Ir. C 4) C— Awry _ OZS'LC NL.w yyam _ —� y•y A7 LLft Arj Y- SawN..lV R M r m m7 01.M. w } L Ar in C v1 X N d V. ![ q � O d C y 11, 4A ,C019 al Or n _ �+ L CJOI.• a1 pp C_ v SN OSO GN rN�Yr\IA N N awe•. L5+' rSCa{.C•.y I N21 -�I y .. L: CJ CI OC C�11 Nr-[ �Q G y -0 rL µ.,p.� 6A ypN.Cp x7Qm� Cp OG C C— oa a L CC,.1. L M� IC4�L GSL _Yam �y rG t+=•' C MYn _�C 0.S aCQ1A m^C� QI pLj PI 90 'AZ ALa G ma�n,Lp Lp ca LNms�'L wa.m--� LA C� E M .•p. C+I m L .O y R-"' R� Q N rr C. M aL.l d¢ C N w m b ..0.rR -0 pox. uMJ7 rN. ^0.s .a w�a �9 TLJ N,Oa in � 1 P9 M� o -m+ E q /6— $� .LTu LTA N 10.0 L ¢' C.6 =T a �T{;rG yiR W n ya q� mm 0 Mo. q �- N LQ LCI R'0 ci SLG q=��-9 LMIAC G 7� r„7ri m .q -M Y Q1.1L r..y�� y L C {} NM •1 0 �t C� L q C —, Q N N C�� C G � SL b y R p y�.•� C=7 y a O U rrYw p Oj7 m� Old C a� V V '� b g =^ L C q+-! n'� s m N d G L V 61 R/ ? L N NG Nape q 0W `p'-iC— -0 ED 6I CNVm COON CJ �Y7 y-J� �r r q N r �= y 7J q G O. R} L 6 S R7 L L C.'N T Y q n V w M a M V �— 6a 1m.. i0 L V 0 . 47 rq .1 �' . y N p1 m aal q V U9t Gr Li -D �� V e A a=1 •� N Na�`I L y =4rQ• X— G�O p �mrM Ny m^ O `. N� r xti a� t m''0�EE �umq V w =� �yC Q V p T - r L ti O d Lr=.H d C m— OI. Jf ^ u1 p N 41 7 -Q u Y? d �.ar 2 O O LS�r �CL A G '�S r O q d N N p Ir dO N y �„ C Ltj1 m T C N O �U . m.•J T� m y U d.~•. a/VN N LI 0O Q —C,—u�0q 0LQO CL N^C+L 4F C^ m m� u NN 0.u pp CNQyI 9LPq 7.r-::^0.G91!!Z, v< t Nom— �C .•�. q— T L.•{ —p 0�— y fJ ay �aml�-7 v Y O edi p p 0 d ? C a >=ym m n `UIOb Lp{u7 �D a L',C . �9L r •G C Y 44..0 CLCL1 y'a CNV y—^ +•/1•ly -PO ti. a0 L3— ml =LD 0. q� ^�C sr„ UL !rs q rul •� y u N C a a Aw V -CSI Q�1 u� N R m� uy ir•- r -".A d LO d1 1^ T10 C u N C yaV ii �„ 4. CI•q• gay.1xIJ NN7LAi RVLP P'.1Ay ^CY1�.. wLJL Y.. 0.L- Y�ci. y+� NC�Y ^.a 15LN O �V L+ ^ r ` O' q. N — C w ~ d c,{ O to q L. N V 0 � -%-E -,0.,,, L C .J Cc - C -0 JCCC U G r� N m+r Y. IJ avl w �aL1"i3p Ly vGdP O.••. mak- ^?G .•q• ~. err V A J! r- ?I Q 2�L. t Q _ 4 .G QI L 4J 'nu LAN m N C O Y Q q I+ q C C.p.I u C MSM L/ r Gw C t `^ r m— y} C, G� 0'C1 i.I V V L N ~— L O L'y r- C N r{ i r/ y W L = r V N Y a —_ 6 .1 r d^ 17 L N F R. L m y m b V C v QI .0 = N 1J I�G10.n �V rt3 q—G a Qd LNt L is^L yyM rj �L �ON�q C 41=ilgq Wa, V0i0 CX Nr•C•Ng0 Cv1� SNO �-qq L 4 Ln cu Gr ` 45 r; ", ' 4 Y E9-10 -Pg3 3 1 e :I' L. w� 1 is "§; I 4� yhl y y X r T-0..fL Y., 4�0U GC a y L y N C .e p L MA L b S eLd Y 4 Y ay 4 C y O� • 4 a a RGtr yw m qyiy O Fem c L .0 C CNn0- y :CL- N'a nV 4 eSL2 ar G Y b- Y=r b .O. C1� N i C.ti" U ` C 4 q ua-- C 4 u p u= uA L �yp�.. N M d V S-2 M .O F% b 9 4 7t N -r O c. Ct.i L d aYW L otEa ^ F u cyy —G q G d C N B^- L Dud W 6 N � 4 L C h a� _ q r N V L a '-J d V �S= N Eby q W Q qa GQ -MO C 4 L c en L=Y 0 q q 4 4 S d q 47 a� _C -2 W Y r a.t `j � C: c 6 t- -C j L t V. T7 .O q i -t LN -N O p V 1CO w CteJy elr bN- t 9N v d aIRL q e'c db �n +amu �+�LG .� rppi cci��fL-1 v=CL N``H4 4y•d'°4 S d 4` �G 'y� TN yYVw V C dOr�.iCa d0" "T L .� Q en O i O tJ O G �a SL 3 V �Cyf w L C-} C q C L ^rCa a.Y 4 C =l V y .-. enc0 m O0.l �6 OGCry^moovL f Nr4 N C q� - 4+V+ :'1~ C Y 4 4 U �� 6 y!'• re L o fl r Y. c a .+ o N V C �+ •' V O M w-- WNav U— x-� 4 {«-r. cLt'JGO CLL O L �s L W N #'a 8 zL 7 312 C-.Er 4 V n CY•� -C Ny- V-V.GL yv q� -q - L d T wN a,-NuY L qwq� = CC 4 twC aC �+ �q- C N../N.:. o L 0L4 SFW q -4.F N a ehw� F +�.t q QYL der9,;1! q Ox ; R Ho Z 0.t u._- Y4it !ay a. ++u qr:. O L2 = and L 2 p 9 pa N E tl E � �4. �. m �Mx{¢ Mqui VI1Y O 7OL.R--i N�w.=u(1 ULY tioL ..CaZ .diLm ol -ppp Ct;,. COgqC M4L..Q. '�� Dy C V V4:hVlG Cri-rFt V .G cn& al •3� C L T.t aq -&. t1 OR aN/ N d- L-'- Orl q CG— U CIL CIH Ld4— .JO dVC C 40 LOC' Cqr N Ly 'C d�l i La_ o L `J q- SOC 4 ti0 CiCM ��G 4q Na`O L LVL w �yY" Oda au v Ip E"— La-a+'o ,C G tda,..teSL _ a k W E S a CI N V}A. 4 S L X'n a r q q E9-10 Pg34 eta ON7Zau �Oq -rOOtq d TNN Q1 4t7 - N 1La! q ^N SYI 7 M pw C p by 0 y Y C A x 9. r .r.Y 4►.�mqp O O ? es C O xtla d Y + Tb9 CY yfa Y}Ni aN m9 N CV T dY.IC b tiw r Cent- L DCN li .40 NL nL J Na ` s- v `C v. G sum OO,t 01 4Nu 4I d C 05�N G P. L d N p n�'bL L -jd wnW dcw au.r yA EqC q S u9M C d b C U C 4 N�Y>.^ � N N C O N L.0 CI A qp fY •Ga L# N — N y u L 4 b ? CNN b dCY y V p Op 00./d — 'T4 31 tlb C -S d 4 ep 7q= C U t�L yQu O Ltd 7 WC90.Ytvy Mn Od -D•7 Yp .Obd - L -�-N pqy ElY F R dyr C O a r Mo. O Y 00N= NCI �N rdLO a.G dd � cL�'rA b y„C'r QE ENE a u— a N GC aCY q V 0 mei Pd M7 w� �.� ni as y • -d o4a C -.� —y 4. .,� a—vim E CLO Wo n q b�.-.� er 3, VL-diSRN O+7MY gip{ rL MN - LG y O y t� O U Myaw� 0v V9«a- L. �y�y - �e S� ��" ay 7a w 44�C7 d -47d LA Y Ley a F �4i N u� '-"c b x ND nLecU q Q c E,-0 0" a—+ '� u—v d Sn u 4 r �` o Y— N 4 �k'a a N 31ap NEE^.� t'n �7mu ej YNrY o a^ tae Cu _ Yy�G Lypi L- +op -a 26d L r +G�t.i C] a 1!y be C N d y 7'11L _ cm- at .�CAfJ � O N V V CI � S't•b' 4 N Y 4 �- � S OO -CS-2 a� 4 pN- MqS� q U �S C N cc, L7 �;q 4Z a! 16 Lvti C LNV C y d rI ., µli CI= V bYF NA 4D4OI O �UWL 91y ClCNCO a7 1GL L L Nd R7 'LN CV q�tYnr N n,b a.22t- OL.0 T. �.q .L. N m SSJM AGE N'O WUCO* bA t11 Yl `yL U7ur6 IceQy O Y 11 wwM\\\iil I I I 9� f w z t 4� yhl y y X r T-0..fL Y., 4�0U GC a y L y N C .e p L MA L b S eLd Y 4 Y ay 4 C y O� • 4 a a RGtr yw m qyiy O Fem c L .0 C CNn0- y :CL- N'a nV 4 eSL2 ar G Y b- Y=r b .O. C1� N i C.ti" U ` C 4 q ua-- C 4 u p u= uA L �yp�.. N M d V S-2 M .O F% b 9 4 7t N -r O c. Ct.i L d aYW L otEa ^ F u cyy —G q G d C N B^- L Dud W 6 N � 4 L C h a� _ q r N V L a '-J d V �S= N Eby q W Q qa GQ -MO C 4 L c en L=Y 0 q q 4 4 S d q 47 a� _C -2 W Y r a.t `j � C: c 6 t- -C j L t V. T7 .O q i -t LN -N O p V 1CO w CteJy elr bN- t 9N v d aIRL q e'c db �n +amu �+�LG .� rppi cci��fL-1 v=CL N``H4 4y•d'°4 S d 4` �G 'y� TN yYVw V C dOr�.iCa d0" "T L .� Q en O i O tJ O G �a SL 3 V �Cyf w L C-} C q C L ^rCa a.Y 4 C =l V y .-. enc0 m O0.l �6 OGCry^moovL f Nr4 N C q� - 4+V+ :'1~ C Y 4 4 U �� 6 y!'• re L o fl r Y. c a .+ o N V C �+ •' V O M w-- WNav U— x-� 4 {«-r. cLt'JGO CLL O L �s L W N #'a 8 zL 7 312 C-.Er 4 V n CY•� -C Ny- V-V.GL yv q� -q - L d T wN a,-NuY L qwq� = CC 4 twC aC �+ �q- C N../N.:. o L 0L4 SFW q -4.F N a ehw� F +�.t q QYL der9,;1! q Ox ; R Ho Z 0.t u._- Y4it !ay a. ++u qr:. O L2 = and L 2 p 9 pa N E tl E � �4. �. m �Mx{¢ Mqui VI1Y O 7OL.R--i N�w.=u(1 ULY tioL ..CaZ .diLm ol -ppp Ct;,. COgqC M4L..Q. '�� Dy C V V4:hVlG Cri-rFt V .G cn& al •3� C L T.t aq -&. t1 OR aN/ N d- L-'- Orl q CG— U CIL CIH Ld4— .JO dVC C 40 LOC' Cqr N Ly 'C d�l i La_ o L `J q- SOC 4 ti0 CiCM ��G 4q Na`O L LVL w �yY" Oda au v Ip E"— La-a+'o ,C G tda,..teSL _ a k W E S a CI N V}A. 4 S L X'n a r q q E9-10 Pg34 W qua 7S � �N � A Y Y Y N I•. t7 L II. v V fJj � ••, y 5p •} ial pua V -Z-59 ,p Oa L L c r NCO q0 A it Cq Rd NL V1 �• aT1� 'O d VbC jl�N q xi i� r G C�•NN, d4N ij I- ;a rQQpaaaa u � � N � a A .G � •0 6 �uL `V d' �� I•q FiTj '�••'QL ago 4c dC aL+ WRQ+a 7"U6 aa0. ^O 7.x.1 C p 4 A d � 5•• N 6 yl dv.L "fir + w NCI •♦+ Y O L a•• W N C C p d R C b� M`4 a G J: 'ni y'J• E d lu EKY Or a� a CC.1C^NdR" yp I"q Ci'Ci E• U�r ,rn u a M q���6 NY= "♦� =.oXd r� d •a�Y q N ~ q q P��l q y N N q CCI E T. C' L L W p N d N V N C MSL Q•y CIL 5/1N Y• -.NV Y R� L Y d •Y Qq = QT G Z7.� Y 4 NC a C+d + JA4 •d •Y xA V CN Lr J+ NAL My N L !1 G`t w r V O q L 4+t L C 7 d A L eY RL6 6Yr 6 % 4LTL {.:� 4 A G a q it - .• J GI L b G �4G; Y 9 ?a �Yr L Q Y N OV hI= [S 1,.. L p4 'S7 GCaO N L4 L � Lqr O v + � GCOGr� d6.+ .+ qci p .Ri i idl �'ICw L GVgj .Ni Cr•„•a � yuq CY +•aaOf9� �Oct=d I'll R A So- J d7C �LdJ L 6V as W �aOi•um ��7 G•Y L v y a pcit y91O46 UNE CJ NL. - JrL d a j i L L aYO 6 q a6N p1 C yNSII Aar„ Od LI.' - Y p N C d!! C¢�IR N ¢ .0 6O' q �sl=carie d a 1 }+ M Q ti t Vw.r 4 t dp— L i e Cl A a 4 R C V �t L x�a8 «? +t y +N.I U p 5r O oej P L a� d d W b�• O•N+L Y � is C L v d ti - M LN d Al 40 N 4y,•� w ? p piiY QJM�` Y y a ` V d N LL,.� C vi v O V .N +.I riE r 6 w^ e•+� C, RN r t Ay = R 9 y d C vNLp/ s 6 V • 9 R I. L LIr LY G A 4. 4LvltJp 9�4 L� Law NL.p�^ G>dv ,y a�.L.a p a a 7�qq N L Y O r p a L W y a N c aLwVLw. J3 ;j a 5 N N YY pLai tj �YNY }9� U ip.INr 9 d r = 4N a q X V G Na. -- NO 7 U.0 O tt CI� L G = NY G w L O L q O 12-0 X x�Q, LIC VV C INY W qua 7S � �N � A Y Y Y N I•. t7 L II. v V fJj � ••, y 5p •} ial pua V -Z-59 ,p Oa L L c r NCO q0 A it Cq Rd NL V1 �• aT1� 'O d VbC jl�N q xi i� r G C�•NN, d4N ij I- ;a rQQpaaaa u � � N � a A .G � •0 6 �uL `V d' �� I•q FiTj '�••'QL ago 4c dC aL+ WRQ+a 7"U6 aa0. ^O 7.x.1 C p 4 A d � 5•• N 6 yl dv.L "fir + w NCI •♦+ Y O L a•• W N C C p d R C b� M`4 a G J: 'ni y'J• E d lu EKY Or a� a CC.1C^NdR" yp I"q Ci'Ci E• U�r ,rn u a M q���6 NY= "♦� =.oXd r� d •a�Y q N ~ q q P��l q y N N q CCI E T. C' L L W p N d N V N C MSL Q•y CIL 5/1N Y• -.NV Y R� L Y d •Y Qq = QT G Z7.� Y 4 NC a C+d + JA4 •d •Y xA V CN Lr J+ NAL My N L !1 G`t w r V O q L 4+t L C 7 d A L eY RL6 6Yr 6 % 4LTL {.:� 4 A G a q it - .• J GI L b G �4G; Y 9 ?a �Yr L Q Y N OV hI= [S 1,.. L p4 'S7 GCaO N L4 L � Lqr O r1 d ar qL. . LrrGW � GCOGr� d6.+ .+ rGj G7 w i idl �'ICw L GVgj .Ni Cr•„•a � yuq CY +•aaOf9� �Oct=d I'll R A So- J d7C �LdJ L 6V as T6S �aOi•um ��7 G•Y L •Y N�wn 3Cl7 =q G1, •Y0. y91O46 UNE CJ NL. - JrL d a j i L L aYO 6 q a6N p1 C yNSII Aar„ Od LI.' - `O L p N C d!! C¢�IR �� C� �� tim^�_.4i^ ¢ .0 6O' q �sl=carie ♦ ^ C A C Vw.r 4 t dp— L i e Cl A p q 4 R C V �t L x�a8 "S ILO> +•O. 4I3 Rq SLC �G, Ci P=a to C r d' C tl W b�• O•N+L JS G^� C Rp _w_r+t n 0 ii Y.•d•Z 40 N 4y,•� w ? p piiY QJM�` A .aL 4 a ` V d N LL,.� C a rJ as N 0. q v O V .N +.I riE r 6 w^ e•+� C, RN r t La a arc.. A••a- bJCq G C=q�'J a•i-11 v vNLp/ s 6 V • c•n.ac LIr LY G A 4. 4LvltJp 9�4 L� Law NL.p�^ G>dv ,y a�.L.a p 7�qq O r d w0x RAY N L 4QY V•-• aLwVLw. J3 ;j R N CI Q+1 �O4 pLai tj �YNY }9� U ip.INr NN MCN nY G Na. -- NO 7 �o�.yyV E1RV qL `o yC360--J NY X x�Q, Cf ya N COO (-.UL Crq Ca U COr YI NV �� Ir•�S+ti � gvaTl � C np C7. �C� yOy L �[�.i =WLN CLJ NSP, .8 ,,G�, ._rr CPVc FN qy +•.G _ 'c..}` 5Z GVQL Y L L L �i•.�az CIO L♦ wL� 1Z =map CmU, q IC q r O C N^ O !7 07 p N p"17 r C: L C1 ai+ Cy O L O N a O— �ai p b -, .moi C aCSd. ••O• �ULOCIY/• �rCN r•r UR Pv1 m • �RI u N 7V TJ ao a7 q �ih LY Mid.13?Y7 q��6 N�Qy�yL Ei C. d eF, `Eon A; ��cc �tr`t g� cL a cc y CaV U N r� 4 q •p V u E9-10 Pg35 � W D C Y I& -JN •+ C � A a i w '�gval 6&G rN yci. q p WNC• A p N b q N CO 1T y ^yLd a C -6a .5^ L,d c r y L d N�� T O n 4 L Y w •�j q 4 Ctil v d C plG� d 6 u.: Nu am w�s••� a 9 � C N M d C l d L a LtiY E r A N N 50 a O GCr4 L U 9q NQ' A G N +L+ X 1F - t Q z N�9 d U L a J hill dNp1 r a p a a °I Y ao�LJgY2 Ph — 7Q cN 11r�Zy-" N�4QyL rN "L 7F�3 4 « •'+ LUd ?� C p A P d q Q iLw L IO ! eTa JV b . sib G N w.C. CI �! .j N G p" b q • �. N b N �Y. � GN d Y O y Ano s �adl aad b m �L '^�� q�� map+ �+. N a NbVbW L1 UL tl iLN qd u zu L .r C p V CJ7 L, 0. 9 � y � 3 e� 4 .—.� "r rI q x �L¢Crpi N Ne ra.cn yC � d•+ d N� U� q C. 21 NN O C 4 Np— C� iUd4 +T+ q 9r 7d'p C1� p OL ull7 F 10U9 PV A1s !A if N allo�c t cta Lva=.+ L.m �, " din m d i! S airs! VL pa! r! ri1L U31 G� p.d.. cif G as Oulu d ow �y ryRy Ny aN d a b 4-. 1� fUi1 � " N L Lb G ce by L ems!50 m r-�L A^ai+ 0 —0c a� •a a dt, L p— r a wy e"v•p p ti a .gCti C T Q S o • mu b � � N o-0 y Ciq` HIT b apt- N4 ~ NLLL a.— ap �4 E GC Y C! .� d 7— E V M, 1� L U CI b y ti�L N ..{w tr2 p ? p7 L� A q�C t � 9w 4i fill CJ q r LNJ.CC L ♦^...d. d Q all \A b C Ca tY UL Ed •i Fws pA aV ~ M�ii CN N— LO b N if L 7 C " QIM L x q q Y L V L q m six O 0.d p G C U L J s m .-. } N pr CrU �d qN C U _C Y L G� y el V�• .+ N LCI p x� "0 4r! p G� t � 1�rG y Ja N QI b p�C V C1J A12. l 3Cw ..G..v UGC AL Va �d U pI} q mill-, G3.+ G W A L G N p t1 A N L C P L b u a1 A L d m i d 5 7 SI = G I.I C L 0.V 0. n "� 5 v L O bV� !tiV 6wC. use rii NLLV 3 G LJb b O L C all 9 40 d L yd y Fwl aaw ¢N -Lx a rz N_ y � E aC"I N 4 A � Vr vN p� L L GLr L. L �" YS1G a t� gig! d ` T b T = lie rLi Lw #I p�i u NA�iCti b �- �,I HIM V"y LD dy L in =fir 4i minim uvM Ydbi+k -wN is� �M ALi�:d•�l _cmr�.W i1uP xN, ccL1Rp• K r�J :elm bG LSCA—u 4 agms = �" a` p m pt: A N W ��C use �+ 4 ry M v db ; y "J m L .. V d r. Nom, ap L r c d` C � Lm.. slid; Lr d A a— .p � '.' a! C G l a1 "gill CJ 1 L L1 p U A, {♦I W Y94. g d N v aF Q— G. q � Q Lr — L, C r N L Gq 6� p gIGap p Y N E airs Cu d 7L N $ Y 9 L a p d L w Jam B won v �O LlL pd � rl NV�6 L W a+LV. CpI Up N � A a ..wN Sal l dw I E9-1 0 Pg36 4 i v ,E— c ,VR1•- — 4 1 • V q r Mu -5 '*41 i m r p1• -a= C C tll y 2'1 ?. L V V CI y C rC1 Qr N ` s. N 9 y a N r C L L y •p a � . A N � Z v �C NELz� a 49 ^N d• N4 V—L U9 N •- NL.. ob r G +r �7r N G OCC ti YCF } N a C G A C a C as M y qd �O c. r rl .4. ...p 3 V 4. u R a U C+} z ++ s- 7 y w y n C d ^ G ,C.X Y r _•C r N +„Ny ..G. bW pGa 1r CL. y''' ~ ei i- a N A G pb 'c r� +.r • L r r. D d w y r Z V Nr O V w cc Oa U u M L .ucM �L 'up �e yr o� 4 t� 2 LO rpa �`� @ 2 q.a o .027 y N o N cii � � QT ;:. U G C _M m N N w a s G A -0L _ Q— �-• .�V. V- . N V g. L) N e.0 M'D y iav r3 o ca ei NL Liq wa .�.. `� M 4N aG•�V-� N L 4 LO '?.Lye 1%V m �a la..d al —` y `p %� CV LUQ V NN �.J L 9 W y y C a' Y a r p p.rL. 4 p i • Nr cca C •^•• L •- V .� L C b M c VIII a =`N �.r ea Rye Atari a CI'i• S Cw^'••G � Yu y~J L, Np L C L AA q' w CL 41 b XN y L— �r m V . • .d .P N Dater a .=° 4w — c V cLi u d av r:i—EL U a It ou.La ?alae .• �na 'amu s L .� V �� u^_ G ¢ 4 W.0 x [1 AL m cc= dy�j~ rC.V` �� .y1..y aa• GC+r 0.Ca 7 Yd nL 7 6' J G.r iJ1 K •n N L L a v sL a 9: n o • tz I 1D I A L M N y t _ I I La ( l C 4 E9-10' Pg37 p e V C L L U 6 L fJ 9 = � � D C. L a+ u ei c vivi a X y O q A QY� U N V A y7 •ate 09 0 Z M uu- y .Cr Cr O c`° o y ar1N .=Nu aa'" A r v L 11G D G N i+ L V t V O b M Q L CLQ L - C r- ^' .Ci N V L L var C y" �uj i LILq ^�I L.1 . Ci V rj r � L •r • Nom.• C— x, n a'. r p1• -a= C C tll y 2'1 ?. L V V CI y C rC1 Qr N ` s. N 9 y a N r C L L y •p a � . A N � Z v �C NELz� a 49 ^N d• N4 V—L U9 N •- NL.. ob r G +r �7r N G OCC ti YCF } N a C G A C a C as M y qd �O c. r rl .4. ...p 3 V 4. u R a U C+} z ++ s- 7 y w y n C d ^ G ,C.X Y r _•C r N +„Ny ..G. bW pGa 1r CL. y''' ~ ei i- a N A G pb 'c r� +.r • L r r. D d w y r Z V Nr O V w cc Oa U u M L .ucM �L 'up �e yr o� 4 t� 2 LO rpa �`� @ 2 q.a o .027 y N o N cii � � QT ;:. U G C _M m N N w a s G A -0L _ Q— �-• .�V. V- . N V g. L) N e.0 M'D y iav r3 o ca ei NL Liq wa .�.. `� M 4N aG•�V-� N L 4 LO '?.Lye 1%V m �a la..d al —` y `p %� CV LUQ V NN �.J L 9 W y y C a' Y a r p p.rL. 4 p i • Nr cca C •^•• L •- V .� L C b M c VIII a =`N �.r ea Rye Atari a CI'i• S Cw^'••G � Yu y~J L, Np L C L AA q' w CL 41 b XN y L— �r m V . • .d .P N Dater a .=° 4w — c V cLi u d av r:i—EL U a It ou.La ?alae .• �na 'amu s L .� V �� u^_ G ¢ 4 W.0 x [1 AL m cc= dy�j~ rC.V` �� .y1..y aa• GC+r 0.Ca 7 Yd nL 7 6' J G.r iJ1 K •n N L L a v sL a 9: n o • tz I 1D I A L M N y t _ I I La ( l C 4 E9-10' Pg37 0 DATE: July 9, 1997 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Steve Hayes, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVN N A SESS E T AN CQNDITIONAL U PER IT 7-15 - C IGNETT - The proposed development of a 2,550 square foot, three -bay, quick - service oil change facility adjacent to the existing Deer Creek Car Wash service facility, located within the Community Commercial designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, on the east side of Center Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-401-34. PR ECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION-. A. Surroundinq Land Use and Zon"ing- North - Vacant; Industrial Park (Subarea 17 of the Industrial Area Specific Plan) South - Full-service car wash and gas station facility; Community Commercial (Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) East - Deer Creek Flood Control Channel and commercial shopping center; Flood Control and General Commercial West - Vacant land; Community Commercial (Subarea 3 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan) B. General Pian Desi nati ns: Project Site - Commercial North - Industrial Park South - Commercial East - Flood Control/Utility Corridor and Commercial West - Commercial C. Site Ch racteristics: The site is within an undeveloped part of the Deer Creek Car Wash facility. This portion of the site is currently vacant and does not contain any structures or significant vegetation. The site slopes from north to south at less than 2 percent. D. Parking Calculations,: Number of Number of Type Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footane Ratio-R@guired Provided Auto Service 2,550 3 plus 2/bay 9 4.90 The proposed parking areas are intended to serve both this use and provide parking for fir+r rra hrilra:.,..., '"t may be constructed in association with the Conceptual Master Plan. EXHIBIT F F9_10Po38 i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-15 - CLIGNETT July 9, 1997 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General The applicant is proposing to develop a quick -service oil change facility at the north end of the existing Deer Creek Car Wash facility. The current owner/operator of the car wash and gas station is expected to operate the proposed oil change facility as well an any future buildings that may be developed on the balance of the site. The remainder of the site has been conceptually master planned to show that future buildings could be constructed along the northern boundary of the site. The building will take access from the existing driveway on Center Avenue which currently serves the existing automotive -related facilities. The building is proposed to be oriented with the service doors facing east/west with extensive landscaping, overhead trellises, and recessed doors to minimize the impact of the doors facing Center Avenue. The proposed architecture has been designed to be consistent with the material use, colors, and details of existing buildings within the complex. B. Design Review Committee: On June 17, 1997, the Committee (Bethel, Coleman) reviewed the conceptual development plans and recommended approval with conditions, pending some minor plan revisions. The revised plans were again reviewed by the Committee (Bethel, Coleman) on July 1, 1997, and the Committee found the requested revisions acceptable and reinforced their previous recommendation of approval. C. Te-chni-cal and Grading Review Committees: On June 18, 1997, the Technical Review Committee reviewed the project and determined that, together with the recommended special and standard conditions of approval, the project is consistent with all applicable standards and ordinances. The Grading Committee reviewed the project originally at their meeting on June 17, 1997, at which time it was recommended that the applicant provide additional information. This information was received and the project was again considered by the Grading Committee on July 2, 1997, at which time it was recommended for approval by the Committee. D. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study was completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Checklist, and found that there could be a potentially significant impact on the environment in areas such as water, transportation/circulation, and aesthetics, unless proper mitigations are incorporated into the project design or become recommended Conditions of Approval for the project. All of the recommended mitigations have been, or will be per the recommended conditions, incorporated into the project design. If the Commission concurs, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices were sent out to all property owners within a 300 -foot radius of the site. E9-10 Pg39 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 97-15 - CLIGNETT July 9, 1997 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 97-15 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issue a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Respectfully submitted, rad Buller City Planner BB.-SH/ifs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Landscape Pian Exhibit "D" - Grading Plan Exhibit "E" - Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Floor Plan Exhibit "G" - DRC Action Comments dated June 17 and July 1, 1997 Exhibit "H" - Initial Study, Part II Resolution of Approval with Conditions E9--10 Pg40 ET 10 Pg41 Ca N J W V 7'tfi7LSb��il6 . I.J1iY�lL 1#� S-�f4Eu ti�-�1Rr rruu•• _ ul v I m . w c�►o aen� s 2 asodoad I a 9 0 �--� 1 ' I t 1: l i ao i 1• r1r E1 1- •I 1' n '1 1 n 1 � 1 1 I 1 I S F ■. F f IL , 1 1 . 1 r t I 5 1 + v I m . w c�►o aen� s 2 asodoad I a 9 0 �--� 1 ' I ao r1r xa� o ID , 1 n 1 � ; r r F ■. F f IL , 1 1 1 1 1 v I m . w c�►o aen� s 2 asodoad I a 9 0 j �Sfr1V��H SL'TI Aul �--� 1 ' ao r1r xa� o ID , j �Sfr1V��H SL'TI Aul Jill W 16, MIR � ♦ y�tr '� • w-aw�wrr r. r. r,ran i?79we7vww+r•�r•�r�rd t a� a LU w It V E9-10 Pg45 H( � WI Lr lqb E9-10 Pg46 Z F- O z W J LU w H x W .0 co IL tL L, �'w PCI R,eport -71,ritq-1 £9--10 Pg47 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 6:00 P.M. Steve Hayes June 17, 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 7-15 - CLI NETT - The proposed development of a 2,550 square foot, 3 -bay quick -service oil change facility adjacent to the existing Deer Creek Car Wash service facility, located within the Community Commercial land use designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, on the east side of Center Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-401-34. Design Parameters: The site is adjacent to property zoned Industrial Park to the north, which was recently approved for development of a nine -building, multi -tenant industrial park. To the south is the existing Deer Creek Car Wash and gas station facility, which this new building will share access with from the existing drive approach on Center Avenue. The Deer Creek Flood Control Channel is immediately east of the site and to the west is vacant commercial Band. The site slopes gently from north to south and is proposed to be graded to tie in with the existing grade of the car wash facility. No significant vegetation or structures exist on the property. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues, The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project_ Staff generally feels that the architectural concept, which is similar and uses the same materials as existing buildings in the complex, is acceptable. However, the same level of detailing (such as cornices, finish treatment around roll -up doors, etc.) should be utilized throughout the project. 2 Trellises should be 'ntroduced over the roll -up doors on the west side of the building for the same distance westerly as previously done with the trellis over the gas pumps at the car wash entrance to give the building more substance and reduce the prominence of the doors. 3. Additional planter areas, including trees, should be provided around the building wherever possible to soften the building mass from Center Avenue. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. A more significant landscaped area (5 feet or wider) should be provided between the storefronts of the future buildings shown on the Master Plan and the drive aisle to the south. Additional areas of special paving should be provided in conjunction with development of the new building, to the satisfaction of staff. The existing special paving should be adjusted to line up with the back of the proposed parking spaces near the existing vehicular entrance to the site. Policy _ Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. Berming and landscaping should be used, in a similar fashion to that already used along Center Avenue, to screen the parking areas from view 2. All colors, materials, and exterior finishes should match that already used at the existing car wash facility. E9-10 Pg48 Staff Recommendation= Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval of the project to the Planning Commission with conditions. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present' Bill Bethel, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Brad Buller The Design Review Committee recommended approval subject to the following changes: Trellis should be provided on the west side of building, either freestanding or attached. Trellis design should be compatible with existing trellis at car wash. Further, it was suggested that the driveway throat could be narrowed to provide additional landscaping to help screen the service bays. 2, Roll -up doors should be recessed. 3. All of the above staff comments sha'I be incorporated into the revised plans. The revised plans should be reviewed by DRC as a Consent Ca:endar item. E9-10 Pg49 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE CONSENT CALENDAR ACTION COMMENTS JULY 1, 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-15 - CLIGNETC - The proposed development of a 2,550 square foot, three -bay, quick -service oil change facility adjacent to the existing Deer Creek Car Wash service facility, located within the Community Commercial land use designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, on the east side of Center Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-401-34. O i n Review Committee Action: Members Present: Bill Bethel, Dan Coleman Staff Planner: Steve Hayes The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the project with the inclusion of the overhead trellis, additional landscaping, and recessed service bay doors as requested by the Committee at the previous meeting E9-10 Pg50 Commissioner Tolstoy thought there are already too many standing seam metal roofs in the City. He felt Applebee's should have been caught when it was put up. Commissioner McNiel said he would not object to asbestos the that would look like slate. He said the roofing material at the Virginia Dare Center would be acceptable. Commissioner Tolstoy said he did not want to hold up the project and he felt the City Planner could determine the appropriate rooting material. Mr. Buller suggested that a flat, dark, light -weight tile would be acceptable. Mr. Hayes asked for Planning Commission direction on a previous Commission comment regarding extending the stonework up the south and east walls of the southeast corner of the building. Mr. Buller noted that the applicant had stated it would appear too dominant and suggested that it be used up to a wainscot instead of all the way up the wall. It was the consensus of the Commission that the stone should continue up the wall. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 97-16 with modifications to require an outdoor activity area on the east side of the building and have the final design, color, and material of the roof be approved by the City Planner. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried G. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM NT AND CONDITIONA US= PERMIT 97-15 - CLIGNETT - The proposed development of a 2,550 square foot, three -bay, quick -service oil change facility adjacent to the existing Deer Creek Car Wash service facility, located within the Community Commercial land use designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, on the east side of Center Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard - APN: 1077-401-34. Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Bethel thought the area above the doors was going to be popped out. Mr. Hayes responded that the service bay doors are recessed 3 feet into the building. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Robert Clignetl, 12520 Pacoima Road, Victorville, stated that the architecture, textures and colors match the existing center. He said they had added a trellis in the front because it had been requested by the Design Review Committee. As there was no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. Commissioner Bethel observed that the applicant had followed the recommendations and suggestions of the Design Review Committee. Commissioner McNiel felt the use is good and will be a nice addition to the center. Planning Commission Minutes -13- July 9, 1997 E9-10 Pg 51 yak' *AN.5 3' 0 Motion: Moved by Bethel, seconded by Tolstoy, to adopt the resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 97-15. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: BARKER, BETHEL, MACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE - carried DIRECTOR'S REPORTS H, TRACT 14534 - WILLIAM LYON HOMES - A request to install above -ground utility boxes within a previously approved 121-`.ol subdivision in the Low -Medium Residential (4-8 dwelling units per acre) designation of the Victoria Commun-ty Plan, located at the southeast corner of Victoria Park Lane and Rochester Avenue - APN: 227-091-31. Brad Buller, City Planner, suggested that Item ., be addressed prior to Item H. . A A . . PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments at this tsme, COMMISSION BUSINESS DISCUSSION REGARDING THE OPERATION OF ALBERTSON'S SHOPPING CENTER AT THE SOLI+i�-,IEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE Nancy Fong, Senior Planner. showed pictures of the conditions on site. She recommended that staff be directed to work with the residents, Albertson's, and the shopping center owner to find a solution. Chairman Barker invited public comment Dave Thompson, 7390 London Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, thanked the City for its expediency in discussing the prob'em. He asked if the Commission had the authority to requ're Albertson's to bring the property up to current code regarding sound and sight problems by increasing the wall height and requiring landscaping to mitigate the problems. He thought that should have been done at the time Albertson's moved into the current build ng. He commented that the move by Albertson's had changed the lives of the adjacent residents. He stated that Albertson's has tried to be a good neighbor but there are still early morning deliveries before 7:00 a -m. and the lot sweeper arrives at 6:30 a.m., even on weekends. Robert Brash, 7380 London Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, staled he is concerned regarding security and noise. He staled that a felon had jumped the wall from Albertson's and the Police caught him in front of his neighbor's house. He said he feels threatened. He commented that they are subjected to noise at 6:30 a.m. and at 10:00 p.m. and he thought the situation is unacceptable. Paul Davies, 7398 London Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga stated the wall is his main concern. He said that shopping carts are generally shoved against the wall and people hang around the wall and drink and then jump on the wall. He also complained about 10:00 p.m, deliveries and stated that he has to get up at 4:00 a,m. and drive 100 miles to go to work, Planning Commission Minutes -14- ,duly 9, 1997 E9-10 Pg52 RESOLUTION NO. 97-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-15 FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A 2,550 SQUARE FOOT, THREE -BAY, QUICK -SERVICE OIL CHANGE FACILITY ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING DEER CREEK CAR WASH SERVICE FACILITY, LOCATED WITHIN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 3) OF THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, ON THE EAST SIDE OF CENTER AVENUE, NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN; 1077-401-34. A. Recitals, 1. Mr. Robert Clignett has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 97-15, as descr=bed in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional -Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of July 1997, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duty noticed pubfc hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1, This Commission hereby specifically finds that at! of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 9, 1997, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifical;y finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the east side of Center Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard with a Center Avenue frontage of approximately 125 feet and lot depth of approximately 495 feet and which is presently improved with a full-service car wash and gas station facility immediately south on the same site and vacant land in the area of proposed development; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant, the properly to the south consists of an existing full-service carwash and gas station faciiity, the property to the east contains a flood control channel and commercial shopping center, and the property to the west is vacant; and C. The application contemplates the construction of a 2,550 square foot , three -bay, quick -service oil change facility that wil; expand the 17mits and uses within the existing Deer Creek Car Wash facility to the north; and d. The application contemplates vehicular access for the new facility being shared with the existing automotive uses to the south; and E9-10 Pg 53 PLANNING COMMISSiO&SOLUTION NO. 97-41 CUP 97-15 - CLIGNETT July 9, 1997 Page 2 e. A conceptual Master Plan has been prepared in conjunction with the application to provide a possible scenario as to how future buildings could be constructed on the remainder of the parcel. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows, a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code_ 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows= a_ That the Mitigated Negative Dec=aration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder, that said Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the Planning Commission; and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained ;n said Mitigated Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. Based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. C. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Commission finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits* and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c -1-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations_ 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, Plannrna Division 1) The driveway throat shall be narrowed in order to accommodate additional landscaping to screen the service bays, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. E9-10 Pg 54 PLANNING COMMISSIOMSOLUTION NO. 97-41 CUP 97-15 - CLIGNETT July 9, 1997 Page 3 2) Additional planter areas, including trees, shall be provided around the building wherever possible to soften the building mass from Center Avenue, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3) The future building pads in the Master Planned area are shown in concept only and will require formai application(s) for development at such time development is contemplated. A more significant landscape buffer sha'I be provided between the building fronts and the adjacent parking lot with any future buildings on the north side of the project area with any formal future applications for development of this area, to the satisfaction of the City Planner, 4) Additional areas of special paving, consistent with that already used within the Deer Creek Car Wash complex, shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Planner, 5) 13erming and landscaping shall be used in a similar fashion to that already used along Center Avenue, to screen new parking areas from public view, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 6) All colors, materials, and exterior finishes shall match those already used at the Deer Creek Car Wash facility, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 7) All future pad areas shall be hydroseeded and irrigated for dust and erosion control, to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Concrete mow strips or curbs shall be used to separate the proposed parking lot and drive aisles from the hydroseeded areas. B) Landscaped planter areas shall have a minimum interior dimension of 5 feel to promote mature tree growth. 9) Any future trash enclosures shall be designed per City Standards and be architecturally compatible with the building. Engineering Division 1) If you wish to retain a median in the northerly driveway, the drive approach shall be reconstructed 50 feet wide, with a 10 -fool median per the City's Driveway Policy. 2) Although the northerly driveway meets our "stacking" minimum (per the City's Driveway Policy), if parking requirements are not impacted, a greater separation between Center Avenue and the first perpendicular parking stall is suggested. 3) Process a parcel merger after Parcel Map 15029 records and prior to building permit issuance. 4) Install frontage public improvements on Center Avenue. Revise existing improvement plans as needed. Processing and plan check fees will be required. E9-10 Pg 55 PLANNING COMMISSIOASOLUTION NO. 97-41 CUP 97-15 - CLIGNETT July 9, 1997 Page 4 i3gilding and Safety Division's Fire Prevention/N w Construction Unit 1) Emergency secondary access shall be provided as deemed necessary, to the satisfaction of the Fire District. /liligalion Measures 1) This project shall not precede development of Tentative Parcel Map 15029 or a Master Plan Storm System shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2) Light fixtures shall be shielded and directed away from residential areas. A detailed lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be prepared prior to the issuance of building permits to provide proper shielding of light sources from ad;oining properties_ 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY 1997. PLANNI iS ON THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY; ' E. avid Barker, hair ATTEST: A I, Brad Buller, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of July 1997, by the following vote -to -wit, AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, BETHEL, AIACIAS, MCNIEL, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS; NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE E9-10 Pg56 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 97-15 SUBJECT: 2,550 SQUARE FOOT, QUICK -SERVICE Oil_ CHANGE FACILITY APPLICANT: ROBERT CLIGNETT LOCATION: NORTH OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, EAST OF CENTER AVENUE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time Limits t. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and built to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the District's property upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs. In any building of a station, the developer shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time recordation of the final map occurs. 3. Prior to recordation of the final map or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. sc - BMI 1 E9-10 Pg57 Completion pato 1 1 _/_1 C. 41 0 0 Project No _ CUP 97-15 —_ 2. Revised site plans and building elevat',ons incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 4. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific P'ans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 5. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. B. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers. AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. For single family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner Details shall be included in building plans. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12 -inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2. Textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided as shown on the development plans. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 4. Handicap accessible stalls shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more parking stalls. Designate two percent or one stall, whichever is greater, of the total number of stalls for use by the handicapped. SC_W? 2 E9-10 Pg58 Comotetlon Date 1 / 1 1 I 1 1`I �1 �J 1 1 ! _/_1 _I 1 / 1 E9-10 Pg 59 Project No CUP 97-15 Gomoletion oats 5. Motorcycle parking area shall be provided for commercial and office facilities with 25 or more / 1 parking stalls. Developments with over 100 parking stalls shall provide motorcycle parking at the rate of one percent The area for motorcycle parking shall be a minimum of 56 square feet. 6. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided in all commercial, office, industrial, and multifamily 11 residential projects or more than 10 units. Minimum spaces equal to five percent of the required automobile parking spaces or three bicycle storage spaces, whichever is greater. After the first 50 bicycle storage spaces are prov-ded, additional storage spaces required are 2.5 percent of the required automobile parking spaces. Warehouse distribution uses shall provide bicycle storage spaces at a rate of 2.5 percent on the required automobile parking spaces with a minimum of a 3 -bike rack. In no case shall the total number of bicycle parking spaces required exceed 100. Where this results in a fraction of 0-5 or greater, the number shall be rounded off to the higher who!e number. E. Landscaping 1 A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap'ng in th's case of res;dential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and _h! ^' submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in 1 l� accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19,08,110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborisCs recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 2T% of trees planted within the project shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box 1_I or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one i 5 -gallon tree for every three parking I /_ stal s, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. 5 Trees shall be planted in areas of pub"c view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one 1 tree per 30 linear feet of building, _I 6. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving cond.tion, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the dale of damage. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included ! /� in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 8, Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the I 1 perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the —1-1 design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. E9-10 Pg 59 P-oJect No CUP X7.15 C te"On Date 10. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval 1 1 prior to issuance of building permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of 1 1 Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. F. Environmental 1 Mitigation measures are required for the project_ The applicant is responsible for the cost of / I implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting_ Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $to be determined, prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of a1i mitigation measures These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit_ In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i,e_) beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of building permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. G. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S, Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location 1 1_ of mail boxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mail boxes w-th adequate lighting_ The Final location of the mail boxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: H. Site Development I. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical 1 1 Code, Uniform Plumbing Code. National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts, 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition 1 1 to an existing development, the applicant shat! pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Transportation Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Build°ng Official, after tract/parcel map recordation and 1 / prior to issuance of building permits. �— sc Fy j 4 E9-110 PgGO Grading Projecl No — COUP 97.15 Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading pract:ces. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. The final grading plans shall be completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Street Improvements All public improvements (Interior streets, dra'nage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shat/ be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shai' include, but are not limited to_ curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. Construct the following perimeter street improvements inc'uding, but not limited to, Street Name !Curb l ter A C. Pvml S:de• walk Drive Appr Street Ughls Street Trees Ccmr-, TralI Median Island Bike Trail Other Center Avenue ✓ ✓ ,/ ,/ ./ sc - sr97 Notes. (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shat! be curvilinear per STD. 114. (d) If so marked, an in-I'eu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. Improvement Pians and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. E9-10 Pg61 completion Date 1_I I I_ 1 1 I _1, , 1 1_ 0 0 ProjBd No—CUP ;7-15 Notes: (1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No, 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer, (2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch (at intersections) or 2 -inch (along streets) galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified, e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shalt be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots, h. Street names shall be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program Intersection I,ne of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, I nes of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have Ir'nes of sight plotted as required - K. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Dislricts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. L. Drainage and Flood Control A permit from the San Bemardino County Flood Control, District is required for work within its right -of -way - M. Utilities Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable N (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first, E9-10 Pg62 Completion Date _.f I _ r � —f-1 �1 1 _! 1 �/ 1 FM i N. General Requirements and Approvals Project No _ CUP 97-15 The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of build!ng permits. 2. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: Br Bernardino County Flood C,pntrol District, 3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the Developer. 4. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new street lights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE PREVENTIONINEW CONSTRUCTION UNIT, (909) 477-2730, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: O. General Fire Protection Conditions An automatic fire extinguishing system(s) will be required as noted below: ✓ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15. Note: Special sprinkler densities are required for such hazardous operations as woodworking, plastics manufacturing, spray painting, flammable liquids storage, high piled stock, etc. Contact the Fire Safety Division to determine if sprinkler system is adequate for proposed operations. 2. A fire alarm system(s) shall be required as noted below: ✓ Per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 15- 3. Roadways within project shall comply with the Fire Districts fre lane standards, as noted: ✓ All roadways per Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance 22. 4. Fire department access shall be amended to fablitate emergency apparatus. 5. Emergency secondary access shall be provided in accordance with Fire District standards. 6. Emergency access, a minimum of 25 feet wide, shall be provided, and maintained free and clear of obstructions at all times, during construction in accordance with Fire District requirements. 7. A Knox rapid entry key vault shall be installed prior to final inspection. Proof of purchase shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for specific details and ordering information. 8, A tenant use letter shall be submitted prior to final building plan approval. Contact the Fire Safety Division for the proper form letter. Sr -W" 7 E9-10 Pg63 1 1_ Project No _ QUP a7 -I5 comolellon Dale 9. Plan check fees in the amount of $0 have been paid. An additional $645 shah be paid: `V Prior to final plan approval. Note: Separate plan check fees fof fire protection systems (sprinklers, hood systems, alarms, etc.) and/or any consultant reviews will be assessed upon submittal of plans. 10. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction in accordance with 1994 UBC, UFC, UPC, UMC, NEC, and RCFD Standards 22 and 15, P. Special Permits 1- Special permits may be required, depending on intended use, as noted below, a. Garages. Motor vehicle repair (H-4). APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1 -foot candle power, These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored ceT 2. All buildings shad have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. Lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3 Lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal -resistant fixtures. R, Security Hardware h. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices - S. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. SC-")? 8 1 / � 1 / / / l E9-10 Pg64 RESOLUTION NO. 18-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION NO. DRC2018-00387, REQUEST TO MODIFY PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 84-37 TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SELF-SERVICE VACUUM AREA WITH 19 NEW SELF-SERVICE STALLS UNDER AN OVERHEAD CANOPY OF 4,320 SQUARE FEET IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD OVERLAY DISTRICT, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET WEST OF HAVEN AT 10340 FOOTHILL BLVD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1077-401-48. A. Recitals. 1, Charles Joseph Associates, on behalf of Deer Creek Car Wash, filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2018-00387, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of July 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 2.46 -acre project site located at the northeast corner of Center Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The site is developed with multiple buildings relating to the Deer Creek Car Wash. A car wash building, car detailing building, lube and oil building and three canopies currently exist on the subject property; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is in the Industrial Park (IP) District and is improved with the industrial buildings. To the west is Center Avenue and beyond that is property in the Mixed Use (MU) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, that is developed with a restaurant building and a parking lot. The property to the east is in the Flood Control (FC) District and contains a flood control channel. To the south is Foothill Boulevard and beyond that is vacant property in the Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District; and E9-10 Pg65 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-43 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2018-00387 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOC#ATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH July 11, 2018 Page 2 C. The application proposes to install 19 self-service vacuum stations and an equipment enclosure under an overhead canopy of 4,320 square feet; and d. The project site is located in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards; and e. The project site provides 43 parking spaces and the project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site; and f. Automated carwash land uses are a permitted land use in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and g. On June 20, 2018, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 932 establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of carwashes within the City. Project applications that had paid application fees prior to the adoption of the Urgency Ordinance were exempted from the exclusions of the moratorium. The moratorium is not applicable to the proposed project as all application fees were paid prior to the moratorium effective date. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a_ That the proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or City regulationststandards. Within the proposed Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, carwashes are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The existing car wash and proposed self-service vacuum stations are designed to be compatible with all applicable development standards of the Development Code; and b, That the site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is currently developed as a car wash land use and remains suitable for a car wash land use and the car wash's associated uses, provides appropriate site access, provides all utility services available, and meets all related performance criteria and development standards for a carwash facility; and C. That granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located, The expansion of the carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. E9-10 Pg66 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-43 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2018-00387 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH July 11, 2018 Page 3 4. The Planning Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The project includes new construction of a canopy structure, vacuum stations and equipment enclosure and will not create any negative impacts on the environment. Furthermore, the applicant has provided a noise study which determined that any noise generated from the new equipment and self -serve vacuum stations would not exceed maximum performance standards for noise as described in the Development Code. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning _Department 1) The approval of Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2018- 00387 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Site Development Review DRC2018-00260. 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 85-04 for Conditional Use Permit 84-37 shall apply. 3) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-41 for Conditional Use Permit 97-15 shall apply. 4) Vacuum turbines shall be located within an enclosed building structure. The exterior walls should present a solid face and be free of openings facing west towards adjacent residential uses. 5) The door to the vacuum turbine enclosure should be solid wood core or metal with adequate weather stripping and seal to prevent leakage when door is closed and remain closed at all times when not in use. 6) Vending machines will be located within a recessed alcove on the exterior of the vacuum turbine enclosure to prevent noise leakage from inside the structure. 7) The project shall incorporate best available noise reducing technology such as mufflers, shrouds, acoustic baffles, acoustic silencers and/or variable frequency drives for vacuum turbines. In addition, the vacuum system must incorporate tight seals/fittings for crevice tools and claws, per the manufacturer's design. 8) Project operations must occur within the allowable daytime hours of 7:00 AM to 10:00 PM to comply with Rancho Cucamonga Noise Ordinance. 1=9-10 Pg67 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-43 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2018-00387 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH July 11, 2018 Page 4 4. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E9-10 Pg68 Project #: Project Name Location: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department DRC2018-00387 EDR - Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP 8047 CENTER AVE -107740148-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The canopy posts and equipment enclosure shall be finished with stucco to match the existing car wash building. A green stripe matching the existing buildings onsite shall be painted onto the canopy edge as well as the equipment enclosure. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 5. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Printed 612812018 www.CityofRC.us E9-10 Pg69 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2018-00387 EDR - Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP 8047 CENTER AVE - 107740148-0000 Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9, Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 10, Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Buildinci and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1, When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. Disabled access improvements to the site and building must be provided in accordance to the State of CA published thresholds at the time of plan check submittal, Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Printed 8!28!2018 www C tyofRC.us I`9-10 Pg70 Page 2 of 5 Project #: DRC2018-00387 Project Name: EDR - Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP Location: 8047 CENTER AVE - 107740148-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. This application for storm water quality management plan purposes may be considered a non-priority project. Therefore, prior to issuance of any building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit the land owner with the applicant shall file a Non -Priority Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) with the Building and Safety Department. The applicant may contact Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer, at (909) 477-2710, extension 4202. This project is required to prepare a non-priority WQMP project as the following requirement has been met: i) For areas less than 2,000 square feet of impervious area, the development will be considered a non-priority project and a WQMP document is not required, unless the project is for the outdoor storage of hazardous materials or other materials which may require a pre-treatment of the storm water runoff which will require that a non-priority WQMP document is prepared, including but not limited to, vehicle fueling operations; ii) For significant re -development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 4,999 square feet and new development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 9,999 square feet the following criteria will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared. a_ For all new and significant redevelopment projects; b. If the project is part of a common area of development, a non-priority WQMP document shall be prepared; c. If the proposed development is a commercial project the City will determine if activities may impact the water quality, and if impacts are determined to affect the water quality a non-priority WQMP document will be prepared; d. All industrial projects will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared. Pr nted 612812018 www Qtyof -us Page 3 at 5 E9-10 Pg71 Project #: DRC2018-00387 Project Name: EDR - Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP Location: 8047 CENTER AVE - 107740148-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 5.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 5.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1 _ Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a_ Scheduling construction activity. b_ Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter slit fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits_ j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management_ b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). Printed 612812010 www.CPtyofRC.us Page 4 of 5 E9-10 Pg72 Project #.- Project :Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2018-00387 EDR - Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP 8047 CENTER AVE - 107740148-0000 Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 3. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from Buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. Printed 81291201E mm CilyofRC.us E9-10 Pg73 Page 5 of 5 RESOLUTION NO. 18-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO_ DRC2018-00260, REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 4,320 SQUARE FOOT SOLAR CANOPY STRUCTURE OVER A SELF-SERVICE VACUUM AREA WITH 19 NEW SELF-SERVICE STALLS IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) DISTRICT, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD OVERLAY DISTRICT, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY 1,000 FEET WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE AT 10340 FOOTHILL BLVD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN; 1077-401-48, A. Recitals. 1. Charles Joseph Associates, on behalf of Deer Creek Car Wash, filed an application for the issuance of Site Development Review DRC2018-00260, as described in the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of July 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B_ Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals_ Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 2.46 acre project site located at the northeast corner of Center Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The site is developed with muttiple buildings relating to the Deer Creek Car Wash_ A car wash building, car detailing building, lube and oil building and three canopies currently exist on the subject property; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is in the Industrial Park (IP) District and is improved with the industrial buildings. To the west is Center Avenue and beyond that is property in the Mixed Use (MU) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, that is developed with a restaurant building and a }parking lot. The property to the east is in the Flood Control (FC) District and contains a flood control channel. To the south is Foothill Boulevard and beyond that is vacant property in the Commercial Office (CO) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District; and C. The application proposes to install 19 self-service vacuum stations and an equipment enclosure under an overhead canopy of 4,320 square feet; and F9-10 Pg74 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-44 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2018-00280 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH July 11, 2018 Page 2 d. The project site is located in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, and has been designed to comply with the all applicable design standards; and e. The project site provides 43 parking spaces and the project will retain the existing driveway at the northwest corner of the site; and f. Automated carwash land uses are a permitted land use in the Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and g. On June 20, 2018, the City Council adopted Urgency Interim Ordinance No. 932 establishing a moratorium on the establishment or expansion of carwashes within the City. Project applications that had paid application fees prior to the adoption of the Urgency Ordinance were exempted from the exclusions of the moratorium. The moratorium is not applicable to the proposed project as all application fees were paid prior to the moratorium effective date. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of this Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Within the proposed Community Commercial (CC) District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District, carwashes are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The existing car wash and proposed self-service vacuum stations are designed to be compatible with all applicable development standards of the Development Code; and b. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The expansion of the carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties; and C. That proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of this Development Code. The project site is currently developed as a car wash land use and remains suitable for a car wash land use and the car wash's associated uses, provides appropriate site access, provides all utility services available, and meets all related performance criteria and development standards for a carwash facility; and d. That the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages sustainability within site design and construction and encourages commercial uses to provide a broad range of services to customers. The solar panels provide a sustainability element to this project and the self-service vacuum stations provide another option for customers. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. E9-10 Pg75 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-44 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2018-00260 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH ,duly 11, 2018 Page 3 4. The Planning Department has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. The project includes new construction of a canopy structure, vacuum stations and equipment enclosure and will not create any negative impacts on the environment. Furthermore, the applicant has provided a noise study which determined that any noise generated from the new equipment and self -serve vacuum stations would not exceed maximum performance standards for noise as described in the Development Code 5_ Based upon the findings and conctusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Site Development Review DRC2018-00260 is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00387. 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 85-04 for Conditional Use Permit 84-37 shall apply. 3) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-41 for Conditional Use Permit 97-15 shall apply. 4) Vacuum turbines shall be located within an enclosed building structure. The exterior walls should present a solid face and be free of openings facing west towards adjacent residential uses. 5) The door to the vacuum turbine enclosure should be solid wood core or metal with adequate weather stripping and seal to prevent leakage when door is closed and remain closed at all times when not in use. 6) Vending machines will be located within a recessed alcove on the exterior of the vacuum turbine enclosure to prevent noise leakage from inside the structure. 7) The project shall incorporate best available noise reducing technology such as mufflers, shrouds, acoustic baffles, acoustic silencers and/or variable frequency drives for vacuum turbines. In addition, the vacuum system must incorporate tight seals/fittings for crevice tools and claws, per the manufacturer's design. 8) Project operations must occur within the allowable daytime hours of 7,00 AM to 10;00 PM to comply with Rancho Cucamonga Noise Ordinance. E9-10 Pg76 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-44 SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2018-00260 CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES FOR DEER CREEK CAR WASH July 11, 2018 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9W ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote-to-wit.- AYES: ote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E9-10 Pg77 Conditions of Approval tr` {icA!ON r1 Community Development Department Project #: DRC2018-00387 Project Name: EDR - Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP Location. 8047 CENTER AVE - 107740148-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions The canopy posts and equipment enclosure shall be finished with stucco to match the existing car wash building. A green stripe matching the existing buildings onsite shall be painted onto the canopy edge as well as the equipment enclosure. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval, The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval tetter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Cleric of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 5. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 6_ Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. 8. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Printed 6'28Y2418 www.QlyofRC.us E9-10 Pg78 Project #: DRC2018-00387 Project Name: EDR - Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP Location: 8047 CENTER AVE - 107740148-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. Disabled access improvements to the site and building must be provided in accordance to the State of CA published thresholds at the time of plan check submittal. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 62812618 vmw.CilyofRC,us Page 2 or 5 E9-10 Pg79 Project #: DRC2018-00387 Project Name: EDR -Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP Location: 8047 CENTER AVE - 107740148-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinu Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1 _ This application for storm water quality management plan purposes may be considered a non-priority project. Therefore, prior to issuance of any building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit the land owner with the applicant shall file a Non -Priority Water Quality Management Plan: (WQMP) with the Building and Safety Department. The applicant may contact Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer, at (909) 477-2710, extension 4202. This project is required to prepare a non-priority WQMP project as the following requirement has been met: i) For areas less than 2,000 square feet of impervious area, the development will be considered a non-priority project and a WQMP document is not required, unless the project is for the outdoor storage of hazardous materials or other materials which may require a pre-treatment of the storm water runoff which will require that a non-priority WQMP document is prepared, including but not limited to, vehicle fueling operations; ii) For significant re -development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 4,999 square feet and new development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 9,999 square feet the following criteria will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared: a, For all new and significant redevelopment projects; b. If the project is part of a common area of development, a non-priority WQMP document shall be prepared; c. If the proposed development is a commercial project the City will determine if activities may impact the water quality, and if impacts are determined to affect the water quality a non-priority WQMP document will be prepared,- d. repared,d. All industrial projects will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared - Printed Printed fii28�2018 Page 3 of 5 E9--10 Pg80 Project #: ORC2018-00387 Project Name: EDR - Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP Location: 8047 CENTER AVE - 107740148-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 2. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 5.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 5.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes, f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management, b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area, e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). Printed 6;28f2016 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 5 E9-10 Pg81 Project #: DRC2018-00387 Project Name: EDR - Deer Creek Car Wash Modify CUP Location: 8047 CENTER AVE - 107740148-0000 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 3. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manag water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage includer but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. STANDARDS with Section e all surface surface water groundwater www CityotRC us Printed 612812019 Page 5 of 5 E9-10 Pg82 STAFF REPORT DATE: July 11, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner(/'�l INITIATED BY: Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: VARIANCE DRC2017-01020 - MAYELA YIBALE - A request for a Variance to allow a one -car attached garage and a one -car detached garage for a proposed 1,740 square foot, two-story single-family residence on a vacant parcel of 5,072 square feet in the Low (L) Residential District, on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN:0209-103-33. Related Files: Variance DRC2017- 00552 and Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 - MAYELA YIBALE - A request for a Variance to allow a reduced side yard setback for a proposed 1,740 square foot, two-story single-family residence with a one -car attached garage and a one -car detached garage on a vacant parcel of 5,072 square feet in the Low (L) Residential District, on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN:0209-103-33. Related Files: Variance DRC2017-01020 and Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 - MAYELA YIBALE - A request to construct a 1,740 -square foot, two-story single-family residence with a one -car attached garage and a one -car detached garage on a vacant parcel of 5,072 square feet in the Low (L) Residential District, on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN:0209-103-33. Related Files: Variance DRC2017-01020 and Variance DRC2017-00552. Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) a under Class 3, (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval: Approve Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553, Variance DRC2018-00552, and Variance DRC2018-01020 through adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is within the Low (L) Residential District. The project site is surrounded by single-family development in the Low (L) Residential District to the south, north, east and west. The project site generally level and has been regularly cleared of vegetation. E11-13Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE DRC2017-01020, VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 MAYELA YIBALE JULY 11, 2018 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. Project Proposal: The applicant proposes constructing a 1,740 -square foot, two-story, single- family dwelling unit with an attached 273 square foot garage and a detached 231 -square foot garage. The project site is a legal lot that is part of a tract of land that was originally subdivided on July 31, 1989 and does not conform to either the current minimum lot size, of 7,200 square feet, or the minimum lot width, 65 feet. The lot is 5,072 square feet in size and is 36 feet wide. Two Variances are required in order to construct the proposed single-family residence on the project site. Development Code Table 17.36.010-1 (Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts) permits existing lots of record to be developed at the lowest end of the density range, which for this Residential District is a single-family residence. The required side yard setback is 5 feet on one side and, 10 feet on the remaining side of the house. The applicant is requesting to :reduce the required 10 -foot side yard setback to 5 feet 8 inches. The other side yard setback would meet the required 5 -foot setback. Without a reduction in the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, a residence on the project site would be limited to a width of approximately 20 feet. The narrowness of the lot also precludes constructing the required two -car side-by-side garage (20 feet wide by 20 feet deep) on the lot. The applicant proposes constructing a one -car attached garage (12 feet wide by 20 feet deep) and a one -car detached garage (10 feet wide by 20 feet deep). The applicant has submitted a Variance to deviate from the required two -car side-by-side garage requirement in order to construct a one -car attached and a one -car detached garage. The required number of parking spaces would be provided, but a Variance is required in order for the two spaces to be in different locations instead of a side-by- side configuration as the Development Code requires. The project conforms to all other Development Code requirements including the 35 -foot maximum height limit (27 feet proposed), the 37 -foot minimum front yard setback (71 feet proposed), the 20 - foot minimum rear yard setback (26 feet proposed) and the 40 percent maximum lot coverage (30 percent proposed). The residence is designed with a Mediterranean architectural theme. The second story is setback 10 feet further from the front property line than the first story level to break up the massing of the structure. A small porch is proposed on the front elevation just below a decorative iron accent. Other details that enhance the Mediterranean theme include the arched windows and doorways, "S" tile roof, and the stucco finish on the elevations. E11-13Pg2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential North Single -Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential South Single -Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential East Single -Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential Wesf Single -Family Residences and the flood channel Low Residential Low (L) Residential ANALYSIS: A. Project Proposal: The applicant proposes constructing a 1,740 -square foot, two-story, single- family dwelling unit with an attached 273 square foot garage and a detached 231 -square foot garage. The project site is a legal lot that is part of a tract of land that was originally subdivided on July 31, 1989 and does not conform to either the current minimum lot size, of 7,200 square feet, or the minimum lot width, 65 feet. The lot is 5,072 square feet in size and is 36 feet wide. Two Variances are required in order to construct the proposed single-family residence on the project site. Development Code Table 17.36.010-1 (Development Standards for Residential Zoning Districts) permits existing lots of record to be developed at the lowest end of the density range, which for this Residential District is a single-family residence. The required side yard setback is 5 feet on one side and, 10 feet on the remaining side of the house. The applicant is requesting to :reduce the required 10 -foot side yard setback to 5 feet 8 inches. The other side yard setback would meet the required 5 -foot setback. Without a reduction in the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, a residence on the project site would be limited to a width of approximately 20 feet. The narrowness of the lot also precludes constructing the required two -car side-by-side garage (20 feet wide by 20 feet deep) on the lot. The applicant proposes constructing a one -car attached garage (12 feet wide by 20 feet deep) and a one -car detached garage (10 feet wide by 20 feet deep). The applicant has submitted a Variance to deviate from the required two -car side-by-side garage requirement in order to construct a one -car attached and a one -car detached garage. The required number of parking spaces would be provided, but a Variance is required in order for the two spaces to be in different locations instead of a side-by- side configuration as the Development Code requires. The project conforms to all other Development Code requirements including the 35 -foot maximum height limit (27 feet proposed), the 37 -foot minimum front yard setback (71 feet proposed), the 20 - foot minimum rear yard setback (26 feet proposed) and the 40 percent maximum lot coverage (30 percent proposed). The residence is designed with a Mediterranean architectural theme. The second story is setback 10 feet further from the front property line than the first story level to break up the massing of the structure. A small porch is proposed on the front elevation just below a decorative iron accent. Other details that enhance the Mediterranean theme include the arched windows and doorways, "S" tile roof, and the stucco finish on the elevations. E11-13Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE DRC2017-01020, VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 MAYELA YIBALE JULY 11, 2018 Page 3 B. Variance (Side Yard Setback): The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the required side yard setback from 10 feet to 5 feet 8 inches in order to construct a single-family residence on the legal, nonconforming lot. The project site is 35 feet wide, 30 feet deficient of meeting the 65 -foot required lot width in the Low (L) Zoning District. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Fact: Without the reduction in the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, the applicant would be limited to constructing a 20 -foot wide house, which is substantially narrower than other single- family residences in the same zoning district and in the surrounding area. Finding: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Fact: The substandard project site is a legal lot of record that was subdivided on July 31, 1989 and is 36 feet wide, which is 29 feet narrower than the minimum lot width requirement in the Low (L) Zoning District and is narrower than the lots in the surrounding area. Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact: Without a reduction in the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, the applicant would be limited to constructing a 20 -foot wide single-family residence, which would deprive the applicant from constructing a house of similar width and functionality to those in the same zone. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact: It is common practice to grant a Variance for a reduction in a development standard where there is a physical limitation restricting compliance with that criteria. In this case, the width of the project site, which is a legal lot of record, is 29 feet narrower than the minimum low width requirement for single-family lots in the same zoning district. The Variance will permit the applicant to construct a single-family residence that is of similar design to those in the same zoning district and in the surrounding area. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact: The Variance will not negatively impact the properties in the surrounding area as the reduction in side yard setback will permit the applicant to construct a single-family residence that is of similar design and size to those in the same zoning district and in the surrounding area. The residence on the project site will not adversely impact the value of the surrounding properties as it is designed to blend in with and become an integral part of the neighborhood. E11-13Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE DRC2017-01020, VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 MAYELA YIBALE JULY 11, 2018 Page 4 C. Variance (Two Car Garage): The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the Development Code requirement that single-family residences provide a two -car side-by-side garage. The narrowness of the lot precludes constructing the required side-by-side garage configuration. The applicant proposes constructing two separate garages to meet the minimum parking requirement. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Fact: Without a deviation from the two -car side-by-side garage configuration parking requirement, the applicant would not be permitted to construct a single-family residence on the project site. Finding: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. Fact: The substandard project site is a legal lot of record that is 36 feet wide, which is 29 feet narrower than the minimum lot width requirement in the Low (L) Zoning District and is narrower than existing lots in the surrounding area. Finding: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact: Without a deviation from the two -car side-by-side garage configuration parking requirement, the applicant would not be permitted to construct a single-family residence on the project site, which is a permitted use in the Low (L) Zoning District. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact: It is common practice to grant Variances for a reduction in development standards where there is a physical limitation restricting compliance with that criteria. In this case, the width of the project site, which is a legal lot of record, is 29 feet narrower than the minimum low width requirement for single-family lots in the same zoning district. The Variance will permit the applicant to construct a single-family residence that is of similar size to those in the surrounding area with a one -car attached and one -car detached garage, rather than the required two -car side-by-side garage. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. E11-13Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT VARIANCE DRC2017-01020, VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 MAYELA YIBALE JULY 11, 2018 Page 5 Fact: The Variance will not negatively impact the properties in the surrounding area as the proposed single-family residence will have adequate area (12 feet wide by 20 feet deep and 10 feet wide by 20 feet deep) in two single space garages to park 2 vehicles, in accordance with the Development Code requirement that single-family residences provide 2 parking spaces within an enclosed garage. In this case, the spaces will be in an independent configuration rather than in a side-by-side garage configuration. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the construction of single-family residences. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence on an existing lot. Staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Director has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. To date, no correspondence has been received related to the project or the notifications. FISCAL IMPACT: The project proponent will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The types of services that these impact fees would support include library services, transportation, infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the parcel will be assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the application, the proposed single family is consistent with the goals and policies of the Low Residential designation in the General Plan and the objectives of the Low (L) Residential District in the Development Code. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Location and Aerial Map Exhibit B - Zoning Map Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Floor Plan Exhibit E - Elevations Exhibit F - Landscape Plan Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2017-01020 Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2017-00552 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553 E11-13Pg5 I) aojuo" any uaAeH EXHIBIT A OAV PSOW14H any auueA anb uaneH iq poomuia j r � ut JO auld C u 4 u E11-13Pg6 d y Ew S 41aLf�,ieg s�e.� `4 Q 1 , X V LJ 2 c Q O lJ im 4' V 4 Id 1s�n�eN � 0 Y Q )AV U N W lan6lly ue, o CL EXHIBIT A OAV PSOW14H any auueA anb uaneH iq poomuia j r � ut JO auld C u 4 u E11-13Pg6 d y Ew S Plumeria CT I' �o ion Blvd m,• PAW G ;.' .^✓ r -.l .a a 4th St amc ,.Oain5tT" � y guCLIR:..i i Humboldt Ave it 8th - _w syn 1r1 r. tom, a uA4j N � ld 7�=,w .. �o ion Blvd m,• PAW G ;.' .^✓ r -.l .a a 4th St amc ,.Oain5tT" � y guCLIR:..i i Humboldt Ave it 8th - _w EXHIBIT B E11-13Pg8 !\ } { �,ewa6".v.P.M! Ln G EXHIBIT C \ \ PC j § ); ` q 0 � , 11 ` / ) « .( S� __j < c : / . 0 / g 9 J : :,:• ° y /0 - « 0 ~ � © + gig y C- G®d= < / !; Ln G EXHIBIT C \ \ PC j . .. , T \ 4' . ` q loivi � , 11 ` / ) . .. , T \ 4' . Dwee9 ` q , Dwee9 ƒ- � \N 4 }\} / $ ,.. 9 g ,;a GAGA, §§ r rm $ h / lin NX \ \ ( / }\\ ){ j \(\ %nom ,,w��d ;/.Aa r 22 %am;A,d a ,t /;ate !; ^ m g \ {2 Uj, ( & a eweRg ) / / § ƒ D' '!1|`/gl N! EXHIBIT E 11 }\{ /k ! +< (ƒ L.'s, \ \}\\ \ j\ ) / / § ƒ D' '!1|`/gl N! EXHIBIT E 11 .I� r _ ,oho EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" = V-0" m 'LOUVER DORMER HAUr ROUND r _ Wp f NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" — 1'—O" Xre Users oor esk ooA 1 A Y A htliedwo m I w w EAST ELEVATION FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/4" = 1'-U" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" - V-0" SCALE 1/4" - -0" WEST ELEVATION SCALE SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/4" - V-0" onunrnc W", 'Alms 41st 00005[0160?0 /Ndl �w EXHIBIT F iE 0 E11-13Pg14 w WaT z w ZYQ T U V Z O Z �a mzg O w JWn 00 xa jpN 0 O u G o ? J ¢ m W m E K T W T N p N U Z < O li I�• T � � g T 3 n p o u x s o 5 v J W - - U � J d 0 G¢ _ O T W LL a = � � 4 m 7 T J Vl 1 O U' W a U E r ¢ i Z X K U 0 m � O Q � �4 AFto RESOLUTION NO. 18-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2017-01020, A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A ONE -CAR ATTACHED GARAGE AND A ONE -CAR DETACHED GARAGE FOR A PROPOSED 1,740 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A VACANT PROPERTY TOTALING 5,072 SQUARE FEET IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 25TH STREET APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0209-103-033 A. Recitals. 1. Mayela Yibale filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2017-01020 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of July 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the north side of 25th Street and approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue in the Low (L) Zoning District; and b. The project site is approximately 150 feet from north to south and 36 feet from east to west; and C. To the north, south, east and west is single-family development within the Low (L) Residential District; and d. The applicant proposes constructing a 1,740 -square foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached 273 square foot garage and a detached 231 square foot garage on a 5,072 - square foot lot; and e. The project site is a legal lot that is part of a tract of land that was originally subdivided on July 31, 1989 and does not conform to either the current minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet, or the minimum lot width, 65 feet. The lot is 5,072 square feet in size and is 36 feet wide; and E11-13Pg15 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-32 VARIANCE DRC2017-01020 MAYELA YIBALE July 11, 2018 Page 2 f. Two Variances are required in orderto constructthe proposed single-family residence on the project site; and g. A Variance is being requested to reduce the required 10 -foot side yard setback to 5 feet 8 inches on one side of the house. Without a reduction in the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, a residence on the project site would be limited to being only 20 feet wide; and h. A Variance is being requested to deviate from the two -car, side-by-side garage configuration requirement in order to construct a detached and attached garage. The narrowness of the lot precludes constructing the required side-by-side two car garage on the lot. Development Code Section 17.64.040 states that when garage parking is required, parking spaces shall be designed in a side-by-side configuration; and i. The project conforms to all other Development Code requirements including the 35 -foot maximum height limit (27 feet proposed), the 37 -foot minimum front yard setback (71 feet proposed), the 20 -foot minimum rear yard setback (41 feet proposed) and the 40 percent maximum lot coverage (30 percent proposed). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Without a deviation from the two -car side-by-side garage configuration requirement, the applicant would not be permitted to construct a single-family residence on the project site. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The substandard project site is a legal lot of record that is 36 feet wide, which is 29 feet narrower than the minimum lot width requirement in the Low (L) Zoning District and is narrower than existing lots in the surrounding area. C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Without a deviation from the two -car side-by-side garage configuration requirement, the applicant would not be permitted to construct a single-family residence on the project site, which is a permitted use in the Low (L) Residential District. d. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. It is common practice to grant Variances for a reduction in a development standard where there is a physical limitation restricting compliance with that criteria In this case, the width of the project site, which is a legal lot of record, is 29 feet narrower than the minimum low width requirement for single-family lots in the same zoning district. The Variance will permit the applicant to construct a single-family residence that is of similar size to those in the surrounding area with two separate garage spaces (one attached and one detached), rather than the required two -car, side-by-side garage. e. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, orwelfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Variance will not negatively impact the properties in the surrounding area as the proposed single-family residence will have adequate area (12 E11-13Pg16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-32 VARIANCE DRC2017-01020 MAYELA YIBALE July 11, 2018 Page 3 feet wide by 20 feet deep and 10 feet wide by 20 feet deep) in two garages to park 2 vehicles, in accordance with the Development Code requirement that single-family residences provide 2 parking space within an enclosed garage. In this case, the spaces will be in a separate configuration rather than in a side-by-side garage configuration. 4. Prior to any action being taken on this entitlement, Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the construction of one single-family residence. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence on an existing lot. Staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Plannino Department 1) Approval is for a Variance to deviate from the required two -car side-by-side parking configuration requirement, in order to construct two separate garages, a one -car attached garage (12 feet wide by 20 feet deep) and a one -car detached garage (10 feet wide by 20 feet deep), related to the construction of a single- family residence on a vacant parcel on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN: 0209-103-33. 2) Approval is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553 and Variance DRC2017-00552. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 93 ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary E11-13Pg17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-32 VARIANCE DRC2017-01020 MAYELA YIBALE July 11, 2018 Page 4 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E11-13Pg18 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project#: DRC2017-00553DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 3. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 5. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. Printed: 6/2612018 www.CityofRC.us El1-13Pgl9 Project#: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Existing utility pole subject to relocation to meet city driveway standards. 2. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an Engineering Construction Permit (separate from the Building Permit) shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required 3. Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts) Drainage Impact Fee Transportation Impact Fee Library Impact Fee Animal Center Impact Fee Police Impact Fee Park In -Lieu / Park Impact Fee Park Improvement Impact Fee Community & Recreation Center Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Drive Appr. (City Standard 101 Type R-1) The City shall vacant 10 feet of right-of-way along South property line. Construct 12 feet minimum driveway for east adjacent property from drive approach to South property line. Note: a. Use for single family residential properties on local residential streets. b. The minimum width for driveway approach is 12 feet, 16 feet maximum for 1 or 2 car garages and 4 feet for all others. c. The outermost edge of the approach shall be a minimum of 5 feet from the projection of the side property line, 10 feet from a B.C.R. and 20 feet between approaches on the same lot unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Printed: 6/26/2018 www.CilyofRC.us Page 2 of 7 E11-13Pg20 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 6. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Including existing utility pole. 7. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed: 6/26/2018 www.CltyofRC.us Page 3 or 7 E11-13Pg21 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance If you have any questions, please contact Moises Eskenazi, Senior Plans Examiner at (909) 774-4209 or at moises.eskenazi@cityofrc.us B&S and Fire Construction Documents (FCS) are also available on-line, follow the path from the home page to city hall/building & safety/forms applications & handouts. All CA Building and Fire codes are posted on the State of California web site at www.bsc.ca.gov Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 8/28/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 7 E11-13Pg22 Project#: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. This application for storm water quality management plan purposes may be considered a non-priority project. Therefore, prior to issuance of any building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit the land owner with the applicant shall file a Non -Priority Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) with the Building and Safety Department. The applicant may contact Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer, at (909) 477-2710, extension 4202. This project is required to prepare a non-priority WQMP project as the following requirement has been met: i) For areas less than 2,000 square feet of impervious area, the development will be considered a non-priority project and a WQMP document is not required, unless the project is for the outdoor storage of hazardous materials or other materials which may require a pre-treatment of the storm water runoff which will require that a non-priority WQMP document is prepared, including but not limited to, vehicle fueling operations; ii) For significant re -development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 4,999 square feet and new development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 9,999 square feet the following criteria will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared: a. For all new and significant redevelopment projects; b. If the project is part of a common area of development, a non-priority WQMP document shall be prepared; c. If the proposed development is a commercial project the City will determine if activities may impact the water quality, and if impacts are determined to affect the water quality a non-priority WQMP document will be prepared; d. All industrial projects will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared. 2. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 3. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.2 (Storm water drainage and retention during construction) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Projects which disturb less than one (1) acre of soil and are not part of a larger common plan of development which in total disturbs one acre or more, shall manage storm water drainage during construction. In order to manage storm water drainage during construction, one or more of the following measures shall be implemented to prevent flooding of adjacent property, prevent erosion and retain soil runoff on the site. 1. Retention basins of sufficient size shall be utilized to retain storm water on the site. 2. Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, collection point, gutter or similar disposal method, water shall be filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other method approved by the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. Compliance with a lawfully enacted storm water management ordinance. Printed: 6/26/2018 www.Cityol`RC.us page 5 of 7 E11-13Pg23 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. 5. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 6. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 7. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shat, be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of Code. shall obtain written permission from the line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the show that all manufactured slopes shall permitted line, or the adjacent private the current adopted California Building Printed; 6/26/2016 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 7 E11-13Pg24 Project#: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 16. The permitted grading plan shall be in substantial compliance with the conceptual grading and drainage plan. 17. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. Printed: 6/26/2018 www.CilyofRC.us m E11-13Pg25 Page 7 of 7 RESOLUTION NO. 18-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2017- 00552, A REQUEST TO REDUCE A SIDE YARD SETBACK FOR A PROPOSED 1,740 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A ONE CAR ATTACHED GARAGE AND A ONE CAR DETACHED GARAGE ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 5,072 SQUARE FEET IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 25TH STREET APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-103-33. A. Recitals 1. Mayela Yibale filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2017-00552 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11 th day of July 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the north side of 251 Street and approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue in the Low (L) Residential District; and b. The project site is approximately 150 feet from north to south and 36 feet from east to west; and C. To the north, south, east and west is single-family development within the Low (L) Zoning District; and d. The applicant proposes constructing a 1,740 -square foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached 273 square foot garage and a detached 231 square foot garage on a 5,072 - square foot lot; and e. The project site is a legal lot that is part of a tract of land that was originally subdivided on July 31, 1989 and does not conform to either the current minimum lot size, 7,200 square feet, or the minimum lot width, 65 feet. The lot is 5,072 square feet in size and is 36 feet wide; and E11-13Pg26 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-33 VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 MAYELA YIBALE July 11, 2018 Page 2 f. Two Variances are required in order to construct the proposed single-family residence on the project site; and g. A Variance is being requested to reduce the required 10 -foot side yard setback to 5 feet 8 inches on one side of the house. Without a reduction in the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, a residence on the project site would be limited to a width of approximately 20 feet; and h. A Variance is being requested to deviate from the two -car, side-by-side garage pairing requirement in order to construct a detached and attached garage. The narrowness of the lot precludes constructing the required side-by-side two -car garage on the lot. Development Code Section 17.64.040 states that when garage parking is required, parking spaces shall be designed in a side-by-side configuration; and i. The project conforms to all other Development Code requirements including the 35 - foot maximum height limit (27 feet proposed), the 37 -foot minimum front yard setback (71 feet proposed), the 20 -foot minimum rear yard setback (41 feet proposed) and the 40 percent maximum lot coverage (30 percent proposed). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts setforth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficult or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Without the reduction in the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, the applicant would be limited to constructing a 20 -foot wide house, which is much narrower than other single-family residences in the same zoning district and in the surrounding area. b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The substandard project site is a legal lot of record that was subdivided on July 31, 1989 and is 36 feet wide, which is 29 feet narrower than the minimum lot width requirement in the Low (L) Residential District and is narrower than the lots in the surrounding area. C. The strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Without a reduction in the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, the applicant would be limited to constructing a 20 -foot wide single-family residence, which would be deprive the applicantfrom constructing a house of similar width and functionality to those in the same zone. d. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. It is common practice to grant a Variance for a reduction in a development standard where there is a physical limitation restricting compliance with that criteria. In this case, the width of the project site, which is a legal lot of record, is 29 feet narrower than the minimum low width requirement for single-family lots in the same zoning district. The Variance will permit the applicant to construct a single-family residence that is of similar design to those in the same zoning district and in the surrounding area. e. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Variance will not E11-13Pg27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-33 VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 MAYELA YIBALE July 11, 2018 Page 3 negatively impact the properties in the surrounding area as the reduction in side yard setback will permit the applicant to construct a single-family residence that is of similar design and size to those in the same zoning district and in the surrounding area. The residence on the project site will not adversely impact the value of the surrounding properties as it was designed to blend in with and become an integral part of the neighborhood. 4. Prior to any action being taken on this entitlement, Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the construction of one single-family residence. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence on an existing lot. Staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subjectto each and every condition setforth belowand in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a Variance to reduce the required side yard setback from 10 feet to 5 feet in order to construct a single- family residence on a vacant parcel on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN: 0209-103-33. 2) Approval is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553 and Variance DRC2017-01020. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary E11-13Pg28 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-33 VARIANCE DRC2017-00552 MAYELA YIBALE July 11, 2018 Page 4 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certifythat the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E11-13Pg29 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 3. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 5. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. Printed- 6I26/2018 www.CityofRC.us E11-13Pg30 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 EDR - New home 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Existing utility pole subject to relocation to meet city driveway standards. 2. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an Engineering Construction Permit (separate from the Building Permit) shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required 3. Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts) Drainage Impact Fee Transportation Impact Fee Library Impact Fee Animal Center Impact Fee Police Impact Fee Park In -Lieu / Park Impact Fee Park Improvement Impact Fee Community & Recreation Center Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Drive Appr. (City Standard 101 Type R-1) The City shall vacant 10 feet of right-of-way along South property line. Construct 12 feet minimum driveway for east adjacent property from drive approach to South property line. Note: a. Use for single family residential properties on local residential streets. b. The minimum width for driveway approach is 12 feet, 16 feet maximum for 1 or 2 car garages and 4 feet for all others. c. The outermost edge of the approach shall be a minimum of 5 feet from the projection of the side property line, 10 feet from a B.C.R. and 20 feet between approaches on the same lot unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Printed: 6/26/2018 w .CilyofRC.us E11-13Pg31 Page 2 of 7 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 6. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Including existing utility pole. 7. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with .adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. Printed: www.CityofRC.us.6/26/2018 Page 3 a17 E11-13Pg32 Project#: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new' structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance If you have any questions, please contact Moises Eskenazi, Senior Plans Examiner at (909) 774-4209 or at moises.eskenazi@cityofrc.us B&S and Fire Construction Documents (FCS) are also available on-line, follow the path from the home page to city hall/building & safety/forms applications & handouts. All CA Building and Fire codes are posted on the State of California web site at www.bsc.ca.gov Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 6/26/2018 ewiw.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 7 E11-13Pg33 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Grading ROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. This application for storm water quality management plan purposes may be considered a non-priority project. Therefore, prior to issuance of any building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit the land owner with the applicant shall file a Non -Priority Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) with the Building and Safety Department. The applicant may contact Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer, at (909) 477-2710, extension 4202. This project is required to prepare a non-priority WQMP project as the following requirement has been met: I) For areas less than 2,000 square feet of impervious area, the development will be considered a non-priority project and a WQMP document is not required, unless the project is for the outdoor storage of hazardous materials or other materials which may require a pre-treatment of the storm water runoff which will require that a non-priority WQMP document is prepared, including but not limited to, vehicle fueling operations; ii) For significant re -development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 4,999 square feet and new development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 9,999 square feet the following criteria will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared: a. For all new and significant redevelopment projects; b. If the project is part of a common area of development, a non-priority WQMP document shall be prepared; c. If the proposed development is a commercial project the City will determine if activities may impact the water quality, and if impacts are determined to affect the water quality a non-priority WQMP document will be prepared; d. All industrial projects will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared. 2. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 3. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.2 (Storm water drainage and retention during construction) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Projects which disturb less than one (1) acre of soil and are not part of a larger common plan of development which in total disturbs one acre or more, shall manage storm water drainage during construction. In order to manage storm water drainage during construction, one or more of the following measures shall be implemented to prevent flooding of adjacent property, prevent erosion and retain soil runoff on the site. 1. Retention basins of sufficient size shall be utilized to retain storm water on the site. 2. Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, collection point, gutter or similar disposal method, water shall be filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other method approved by the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. Compliance with a lawfully enacted storm water management ordinance. Printed: 6/26/2016 www.CilyofRC.us Page 5 of 7 E11-13Pg34 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. 5. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 6. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 7. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. wwYv.CilyofRC.us Printed: 6/26/2018 Page 6 of 7 E11-13Pg35 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit.may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 16. The permitted grading plan shall be in substantial compliance with drainage plan. 17. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. the conceptual grading and all new construction projects wet signed by a California Printed: 6/26/2078 www.CilyofRC.us Page 7 of 7 E11-13Pg36 RESOLUTION NO. 18-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017- 00553, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 1,740 -SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A ONE CAR ATTACHED GARAGE AND A ONE CAR DETACHED GARAGE ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 5,072 SQUARE FEET IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 25TH STREET APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-109-33. A. Recitals. 1. Mayela Yibale filed an application forthe approval of Minor Design Review DRC2017-00553 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of July 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on July 11, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property located on the north side of 25th Street and approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue in the Low (L) Residential District; and b. The project site is approximately 150 feet from north to south and 36 feet from east to west; and C. To the north, south, east and west is single-family development within the Low (L) Residential District; and d. The applicant proposes constructing a 1,740 -square foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached 273 square foot garage and a detached 231 square foot garage on a 5,072 - square foot lot; and e. The project site is a legal lot that is part of a tract of land that was originally subdivided on July 31, 1989 and does not conform to either the current minimum lot size, 7,200 square feet, or the minimum lot width, 65 feet. The lot is 5,072 square feet in size and is 36 feet wide; and E11-13Pg37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-35 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 MAYELA YIBALE July 11, 2018 Page 2 f. Two Variances are required in orderto constructthe proposed single-family residence on the project site; and g. A Variance is being requested to reduce the required 10 -foot side yard setback to 5 feet 8 inches on one side of the house. Without a reduction in the 10 -foot side yard setback requirement, a residence on the project site would be limited to a width of 20 feet; and h. A Variance is being requested to deviate from the two -car, side-by-side garage configuration requirement in order to construct a detached and attached garage. The narrowness of the lot precludes constructing the required side-by-side two -car garage on the lot. Development Code Section 17.64.040 states that when garage parking is required, parking spaces shall be designed in a side-by-side configuration; and I. The project conforms to all other Development Code requirements including the 35 -foot maximum height limit (27 feet proposed), the 37 -foot minimum front yard setback (71 feet proposed), the 20 -foot minimum rear yard setback (41 feet proposed) and the 40 percent maximum lot coverage (30 percent proposed). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed single-family residence is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the project site which is for the development of up to 4 dwelling units per acre. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is located within the Low (L) Development District which is designated for the development of one single-family residence on a lot. The project is for the development of a single-family residence on a legal lot. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The non -conforming project site requires the approval of 2 Variances to develop the proposed single-family residence. The project site does not conform to the minimum lot size or lot width as prescribed by the Development Code. Variances are being requested to reduce the required side yard setback and to construct two separate garages rather than the required two -car, side-by-side garage configuration. The project complies with all other Development Code requirements including setbacks, height limitations and lot coverage. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health safety and welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. The project is for the development of a single-family residence on a residentially zoned lot. The proposed single-family residence is designed to blend in with the surrounding single-family residential development and should not negatively impact the public health, safety or welfare. 4. Prior to any action being taken on this entitlement, Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the construction of one single-family residence. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence on an existing lot. Staff concludes that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's E11-13Pg38 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-35 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 MAYELA YIBALE July 11, 2018 Page 3 determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Plannina Department 1) Approval is for a Minor Design Review for the construction of a 1,740 -square foot, two-story single-family residence with an attached 273 square foot garage and a detached 231 square foot garage for a site located on the north side of 25th Street approximately 700 feet east of Hermosa Avenue; APN: 0209-103-33. 2) Approval is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of a Variance DRC2017-00552, Variance DRC2017-01020. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF JULY 2018. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of July 2018, by the following vote -to -wit: E11-13Pg39 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-35 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00553 MAYELA YIBALE July 11, 2018 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: E11-13Pg40 Conditions of Approval CCommunity Development Department Project#: DRC2017-00553DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Plannina Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 3. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 5. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. Printed 6/26/2018 www.CltyofRC.us E11-13Pg41 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Existing utility pole subject to relocation to meet city driveway standards. 2. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an Engineering Construction Permit (separate from the Building Permit) shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required 3. Development Impact Fees Due Prior to Building Permit Issuance: (Subject to Change / Periodic Increases - Refer to current fee schedule to determine current amounts) Drainage Impact Fee Transportation Impact Fee Library Impact Fee Animal Center Impact Fee Police Impact Fee Park In -Lieu / Park Impact Fee Park Improvement Impact Fee Community & Recreation Center Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Drive Appr. (City Standard 101 Type R-1) The City shall vacant 10 feet of right-of-way along South property line. Construct 12 feet minimum driveway for east adjacent property from drive approach to South property line. Note: a. Use for single family residential properties on local residential streets. b. The minimum width for driveway approach is 12 feet, 16 feet maximum for 1 or 2 car garages and 4 feet for all others. c. The outermost edge of the approach shall be a minimum of 5 feet from the projection of the side property line, 10 feet from a B.C.R. and 20 feet between approaches on the same lot unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Printed: 6/26/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 7 E11-13Pg42 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval a A 7 Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. Including existing utility pole. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CilyofRC.us Printed: 812 612018 Page 3 of 7 E11-13Pg43 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first, for: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance If you have any questions, please contact Moises Eskenazi, Senior Plans Examiner at (909) 774-4209 or at moises.eskenazi@cityofrc.us B&S and Fire Construction Documents (FCS) are also available on-line, follow the path from the home page to city hall/building & safety/forms applications & handouts. All CA Building and Fire codes are posted on the State of California web site at www.bsc.ca.gov Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Printed: 6/26/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 7 El 1-1313g44 Project#: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. This application for storm water quality management plan purposes may be considered a non-priority project. Therefore, prior to issuance of any building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit the land owner with the applicant shall file a Non -Priority Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) with the Building and Safety Department. The applicant may contact Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer, at (909) 477-2710, extension 4202. This project is required to prepare a non-priority WQMP project as the following requirement has been met: i) For areas less than 2,000 square feet of impervious area, the development will be considered a non-priority project and a WQMP document is not required, unless the project is for the outdoor storage of hazardous materials or other materials which may require a pre-treatment of the storm water runoff which will require that a non-priority WQMP document is prepared, including but not limited to, vehicle fueling operations; ii) For significant re -development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 4,999 square feet and new development projects proposing impervious areas of 2,000 square feet to 9,999 square feet the following criteria will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared: a. For all new and significant redevelopment projects; b. If the project is part of a common area of development, a non-priority WQMP document shall be prepared; c. If the proposed development is a commercial project the City will determine if activities may impact the water quality, and if impacts are determined to affect the water quality a non-priority WQMP document will be prepared; d. All industrial projects will require a non-priority WQMP document to be prepared. 2. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 3. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.2 (Storm water drainage and retention during construction) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Projects which disturb less than one (1) acre of soil and are not part of a larger common plan of development which in total disturbs one acre or more, shall manage storm water drainage during construction. In order to manage storm water drainage during construction, one or more of the following measures shall be implemented to prevent flooding of adjacent property, prevent erosion and retain soil runoff on the site. 1. Retention basins of sufficient size shall be utilized to retain storm water on the site. 2. Where storm water is conveyed to a public drainage system, collection point, gutter or similar disposal method, water shall be filtered by use of a barrier system, wattle or other method approved by the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). 3. Compliance with a lawfully enacted storm water management ordinance. Printed: 6/26/2018 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 7 El1-13Pg45 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 EDR - New home 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Minor Desian Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water Flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. 5. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 6. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 7. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 8. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. Printed: 6/26/2018 www.CilyofRC.us E11-13Pg46 Page 6 of 7 Project #: DRC2017-00553 DRC2017-01020 Project Name: EDR - New home Location: 10218 25TH ST - 020910327-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 16. The permitted grading plan shall be in substantial compliance with the conceptual grading and drainage plan. 17. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. Printed: 6126/2018 www.CilyofRC.us Page 7 of 7 E11-13Pg47