HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-04 - Resolution - Approval of Time Extension for Two Years of a Previously Approved Variance RESOLUTION NO. 18-04
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TIME EXTENSION
DRC2017-00952, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A TWO (2) YEAR TIME
EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED VARIANCE (DRC2012-
00135) TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM LOT DEPTH FROM 150 FEET TO
124 FEET ON LOT#9 OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 IN THE
VERY LOW (VL) DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC
PLAN (.1 TO 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED ON THE WEST
SIDE OF WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD, SOUTH AND EAST OF BLUE
SKY COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN:
0226-081-15, 16 AND 17
A. Recitals.
1. Youlita and Kiryakos, LLC. filed an application for the extension of the approval of
Variance DRC2012-00135, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this
Resolution, the subject Variance Time Extension request is referred to as "the application."
2. On January 23, 2013, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 13-08, thereby
approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits.
3. On February 14, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga
conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date.
4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced public hearing on February 14, 2018, including written and oral staff reports, together
with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The project site consists of two rectangular shaped parcels and one puzzle-
shaped parcel totaling 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda North
Specific Plan. The parcels are vacant except for two unfinished residences on Lots#12 and #15;
and
b. To the north of the project site is vacant land owned by the San Bernardino County
Flood Control District along with three single-family residences within the Very Low (VL) District
(.1 to 2 dwelling unit per acre) of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP). To the south are
single-family residences within the Very Low (VL) District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the
Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP). To the east (across Wardman Bullock Road) are single-
family residences within the Low (L) District (2 to 4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-04
TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00952—YOULITA AND KIRYAKOS, LLC
February 14, 2018
Page 2
Highlands Specific Plan (EHSP). To the west is a flood control basin operated by the San
Bernardino County Flood Control District within the Flood Control (FC) District; and
c. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development
standards of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) for the Very Low (VL) District except for
the need for a Variance (DRC2012-00135) to reduce the required lot depth from 150 feet to 124
feet on Lot#9 due to site constraints and Minor Exception (DRC2012-00513) to allow for walls up
to 8 feet in height on Lots#1, #9 and #10; and
d. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Minor Exception
DRC2012-00135 for two (2) additional years. The time extension is necessary to allow time to
resolve outstanding engineering issues.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the
above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs
1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of
this Code. Without the lot depth reduction for Lot#9, the applicant would be required to redesign
the proposed subdivision, potentially reducing the number of lots and placing an unnecessary
physical hardship on the applicant. The subject lot exceeds all of the development criterial for the
Very Low (VP) District, except for lot depth. The subject lot is oriented with the long side parallel
to the street and the shorter sides perpendicular to the street. The front lot line for interior lots is
required to be the lot line parallel with the street, which dictates the orientation of the lot. The
current orientation was utilized to design the tract around an existing single-family residence
constructed north of the proposed lot along the south boundary of the project site. The subject
lot will be able to provide all the amenities that the other lots in the area provide including the
keeping of horses.
b. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to
the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other
properties in the same zone. The tract layout was dictated by the two partially constructed
residences on the project site that were permitted by the County of San Bernardino. Other than
lot depth, Lot#9 was designed to meet the minimum development requirements of the Very Low
(VL) District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, though, with an alternative lot orientation similar
to Lot#10 to the east (which is a corner lot in which the front lot line is the shorter lot line).
c. Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would
deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone.
The applicant can meet the spirit of the Code by providing a lot with dimensions similar to the
adjacent lots, with the exception of the minimum lot depth requirement. Lot#9 of the subdivision
will provide a development opportunity for the future development of a residence that will be
compatible with surrounding properties and will provide the ability to keep horses, consistent with
Equestrian Overlay District. The applicant has designed the subdivision to provide the maximum
lot sizes and depths achievable within the constraints of the project site. Accordingly, a strict
interpretation and enforcement of the minimum lot depth requirement would deprive the applicant
of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the district.
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-04
TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00952—YOULITA AND KIRYAKOS, LLC
February 14, 2018
Page 3
d. The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege
inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. The applicant has
designed the subdivision to provide the maximum lot depths achievable within the constraints of
the property and creates an equestrian community compatible with adjacent developments. The
granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the
limitations on other properties in the district, as Lot #9 has a similar lot configuration to the
adjacent lot to the east (Lot#10).
e. The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or
welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The reduction in lot
depth on Lot #9 will not be detrimental to the properties in the surrounding area as the lot will
meet all meet all the related development criteria of the district, but with different lot orientation,
similar to Lot#10 to the east.
f. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local
ordinance. State law allows for two (2) year time extensions.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all
written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the
Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is
required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the
review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's
local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 23, 2013,
in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823, Variance DRC2012-
00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no
subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with
subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are
proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii)
substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously
reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important
information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered;
or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation
measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts.
b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map
SUBTT18823, Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 that substantial
changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which
would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative
Declaration. The application is for a one(1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative
tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that
the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated
Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional
or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of
less than significant.
c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission
concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant
to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823,
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-04
TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00952 —YOULITA AND KIRYAKOS, LLC
February 14, 2018
Page 4
Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above,
this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Minor Exception
DRC2012-00135 is January 23, 2020.
6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 13-08 and incorporated
Standard Conditions in Resolution 13-08 for DRC2012-00135 shall apply to Time Extension
DRC2017-00952.
The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2018.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
ancisco Oaxaca, Chairman
ATTEST: a_AO
Candyc: : rnett, Secretary
I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of February 2018, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GUGLIELMO, MACIAS, OAXACA, WIMBERLY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MUNOZ
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
4�
Conditions of Approval
• o.
L .
RANcx° Community Development Department
t:CANIONGA
Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952
Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823
Location: -- -022608116-0000
Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. Comply with all existing conditions of approval per SUBTT18823.
2. New street lights shall be owned by the City. The developer shall be responsible to coordinate and
pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Street lights for local
and collector streets are now 3600 lumen LED. Street light plans must be submitted to Engineering
for approval.
Standard Conditions of Approval
3. An improvement security per section 66499 of the Subdivision Map Act shall be required prior to
final map recordation, accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:2/14)2018
Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952
Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823
Location: ---022608116-0000
Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Gradinq Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. GROUND WATER PROTECTION:
Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP
document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No.
R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm
Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads:
Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection):
Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not
designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins,
vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum
requirements to protect groundwater:
a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of
ground water quality objectives.
b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be
evaluated prior to infiltration.
c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large
commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial
parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or
more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sqft or more of allowable space designated for parking
purposes').
d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration
treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77}, areas subject
to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or
any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities.
e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or
maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and
used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility
that does any vehicular repair work.
f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and
groundwater contamination.
g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any
water supply wells.
h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic
high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support
beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is
maintained.
i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water
Code Section 13050.
2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit".
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:2/14/2018 Page 2 of 7
Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952
Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823
Location: -- -022608116-0000
Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
3. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices.
The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved
conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan.
4. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans
shall implement design recommendations per said report.
5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of
building permits.
6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects
and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more
of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet
signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a
dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s)
shall be located outside of the public right of way.
8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for
review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the
adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the
perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line.
10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall
be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private
property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and
bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official.
12. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
13. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California
Building Code.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:2/14/2018 Page 3 of 7
Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952
Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823
Location: ---022608116-0000
Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
14. Grading Inspections:
a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a
pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the
grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive
measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading
operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to
continuing grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to
be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of
Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
15. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site
plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations
between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections
CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of
the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code.
16. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from
the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be
scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title
sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
17. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm
water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile
gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be
wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan
storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
18. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements
prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
19. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters
and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent.
This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit.
wnvw.CityofRC.us
Printed:2!1412018 Page 4 of 7
Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952
Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823
Location: -- -022608116-0000
Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution
92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device
(such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one
lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the
drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a
reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for
the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times
the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches.
21. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted
California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and
drainage plan.
22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan
(WQMP)storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
23. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy
of the project Conditions of Approval.
24. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint
maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices
(BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for
by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management
Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of
the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan.
25. The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not allow on-site storm water quality treatment BMP devices
within the individual single-family lots which will be required to be inspected and maintained by each
individual homeowner. As a condition of approval for this single-family residential project (including
tentative tract maps and parcel maps, and final tract maps and parcel maps of 2 lots/parcels or
more) a common storm water treatment system(s) will be required which shall be maintained by a
homeowners' association prior to the approval of a water quality management plan and issuance of
a grading permit.
26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval
by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office.
27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
www.cityafRC.us
Parted_2.'14..2018 Page 5 of 7
Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952
Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823
Location: ---022608116-0000
Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
28. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells)
for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and
Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the
project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned
and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the
project-specific Water Quality Management Plan.
29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis
for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration
chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
30. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in
the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated
with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
31. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports
on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
32. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the
Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum
of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading
permit or any building permit.
33. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor
shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable.
34. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed
maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm
water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device
maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to
submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site
and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant
shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the
proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the
residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the
residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the
property shall be included within the WQMP document.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:2/1412018 Page 6 of 7
Project#: DRC2017-00922 DRC2017-00951, DRC2017-00952
Project Name: Time Extension for SUBTT18823
Location: ---022608116-0000
Project Type: Time Extension Time Extension, Time Extension
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At
a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert
filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance
Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality
management plan.
36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan
shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet"
located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water
Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations
for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility
Safety Factors".
37. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have
a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm
water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the
current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans".
38. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey
those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with
any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated
with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the
storm water drainage flows from the project site.
39. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm
Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of
Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
40. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management
Plan document.
41. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, or recording of the final map, the applicant shall prepare a
storm water quality management plan (WQMP) meeting the requirements of the current adopted
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) permit. The WQMP shall be approved by the City
Engineer, or his designee, and recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit and/or recordation
of the final map.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:21142:;18 Page 7 of 7