The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-02-08 - Agenda Packet - PC-HPCFEBRUARY 8, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca _ Vice Chairman Macias Commissioner Fletcher _ Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Planning Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Commissioner for discussion. C1. Consideration and approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated January 25, 2017 D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be Page 1 of 4 I_9401AWAI_offl HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960 — JAIME CAMPOS — A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 3-lot Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM18626) located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Day Lily Court at 9923 Lemon Avenue — APN:0201-902-16. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 15 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15315) exemption, which covers minor land division of four or fewer parcels. D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES — A request to subdivide 1.01 acres of land for condominium purposes related to the site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74; Related Files: Design Review DRC2014- 00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D3. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development on a 1.01 acre parcel of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74; Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00657— RC1 HOMES — A request to reduce the required street side setbacks by up to 10 percent related to the site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development on a 1.01 acre parcel of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74; Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Design Review DRC2014-00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D5. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00658— RC1 HOMES — A request to increase the maximum permitted line wall height by up to 2 feet related to the site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development on a 1.01 acre parcel of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located Page 2 of 4 &I4 :I _ : 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74; Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Design Review DRC2014-00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D6. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2015-00310 — RC1 HOMES — A request to remove 2 trees related to the site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development on a 1.01 acre parcel of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74; Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Design Review DRC2014-00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00658. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS. F. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, February 02, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. /S/ Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 of 4 FEBRUARY 8, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours priorto the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,662 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 4 of 4 1 19 Be Fo- W Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting FEBRUARY 8, 2017 -- -- r- - - - - - — I t Ei a U d x x p I I y U j c i � m i th St � i se Line Base LIne J i Church Church 4 rthill Foothill C -ow E ` at OPP m t Arrow c ° i Jo rsey L 8th G W I rn m > % t7 6th� c - H 6th w _ 4th x x g _.._..—.. 4th 7N Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Item D1: TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960 . Item D2-D6: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732; ME DRC2016-00657; ME DRC2016-00658 & TRP DRC2015-00310 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION l THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 25, 2017 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 11 I. CALL To ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:18 PM 10790k7i Chairman Oaxaca X Vice Chairman Macias X Munoz X Wimberly A Fletcher —X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, City Planner; Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer; Albert Espinoza, Asst. City Engineer; Dominick Perez, Associate Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary 11 II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Luana Hernandez, Vice President, Route 66 IECA reported the roof of the Chinatown House is failing. She asked staff to contact CVWD. She said the historical group wants it preserved as a Item C -1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES PeMHo JANUARY 25, 2017 CUCAMONGA Page 2 historical landmark. She also asked what happened to the memorial at the fire station on Amethyst. Candyce Burnett, City Planner said she received an update today. She said the plaques were stolen. There is a group working on fundraising to replace them. In the meantime a Boy Scout is cleaning and restoring what is remaining. Chairman Oaxaca said staff could provide an update on the Chinatown structure. IH. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Consideration and approval of Regular Meeting minutes dated November 9, 2016 B. Consideration and approval of Regular Meeting minutes dated December 14, 2016 C. Consideration and approval of Adjourned (Workshop) minutes dated December 14, 2016 Commissioner Munoz abstained from Item A. Commissioner Macias abstained from Items B&C. Commissioner Fletcher moved approval and Chairman Oaxaca seconded the motion. The motion passed to adopt Items A, B and C (Wimberly absent). 11 IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/orposted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. D. TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-01009 - WSI HIGHLAND INVESTMENTS, LLC - A request for a 1-year time extension for Tentative Tract Map 14749 that was previously approved to subdivide 168.77 acres into 269 residential lots located in the Low (L) Residential District and Flood Control (FC) District within the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, at the northeast corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue — APNs: 1087-081-04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09 & 14. Related Files: Annexation DRC2003-01051, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2003- 00409, General Plan Amendment DRC2003-00410 and Development Agreement DRC2003-00411. Staff finds the project to be within the scope of the project covered by a prior Environmental Impact Report certified by the City Council on June 21, 2004, (State Clearinghouse #2003081085) by Resolution 04-240 and does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Environmental Impact Report. Item C —2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CRNC JANUARY 25, 2017 Page 3 Dominic Perez, Associate Planner gave the staff report and Powerpoint presentation. He noted one page of the report may have been eliminated from some of the agenda packets and has been placed before the Commissioners. He said the applicants could be allowed 3 more extensions if they need it. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. John Schafer, representing the applicants stated he agrees with the conditions. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1(Wimberly absent) to adopt the Resolution approving the Time Extension. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19683 - BRUCE KARISH - A request to subdivide a 5.26 acre site into 3 parcels in the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Sixth Street and Center Avenue - APN: 0209-262-25. Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00268. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00268 - BRUCE KARISH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a three (3) building industrial complex on 5.26 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Sixth Street and Center Avenue - APN: 0209-262-25. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19683. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner gave the Powerpoint presentation and staff report. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and hearing and seeing no comment, closed the public hearing. Bruce Karish stated he is the project architect and had no further comment. Commissioner Fletcher asked if the building is for lease. He asked if the 4-unit building would be subdivided and sold. Mr. Karish indicated the 4-unit part of the development is part of a family trust and therefore is unlikely to be sold. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1(Wimberly absent) to adopt the Resolution approving the Tentative Parcel Map and Design Review. G. REVOCATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00031 - SAMIR LAKKEES -A request by the applicant to revoke Conditional Use Permit 97-23, approved on December Item C -3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CRANC GA JANUARY 25, 2017 Page 4 10, 1997 through Planning Commission Resolution No. 97-67, for a request to establish a night club and sports bar, including entertainment, D.J. music, dancing, satellite television, amusement devices (pool table, dart boards) and on -site consumption of alcoholic beverages within an existing 7,930 square foot building in the Mixed Use (MU) District, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Hermosa Avenue, located at 10134 Foothill Boulevard -- APN: 1077-601-14. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, gave staff report and Powerpoint presentation. He said this is an unusual request due to a performance bond remaining on the site. The revocation allows for the Improvement Agreements and bond to be released so that the sale of the property can be completed to allow for new development to take place. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and hearing and seeing no comment, closed the public hearing. Eddie Lakkees stated he is representing the family interests of the named property. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Macias, carried 4-0-1(Wimberly absent) to adopt the Resolution revoking the Conditional Use Permit. H. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00522 - PHELAN DEVELOPMENT - The proposed development of a 102,530 square foot building on 4.78 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northwest corner of Sixth Street and Hermosa Avenue; APN: 0209- 211-41. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00524. The Planning Department has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of .the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 32 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) exemption, which covers in -fill development projects. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00524- PHELAN DEVELOPMENT -The request to remove twenty heritage trees associated with the proposed development of a 102,530 square foot building on 4.78 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northwest corner of Sixth Street and Hermosa Avenue; APN: 0209-211-41. Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00522. The Planning Department has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 32 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) exemption, which covers in -fill development projects. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner gave the report and Powerpoint presentation. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and hearing and seeing no comment, closed the public hearing. It was also noted the applicant was not present. Moved by Macias, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1(Wimberly absent) to adopt the Item C -4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ,,C„O JANUARY 25, 2017 Cu�c ONGA Page 5 Resolution approving the Design Review and Tree Removal Permit. V. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION . J. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES K. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS Chairman Oaxaca thanked staff for making all the arrangements for the Planning Commissioners Academy being held by the League in March. 11 VI. ADJOURNMENT 11 7:55 PM 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 19, 2017, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is Item C —5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION r�, AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO JANUARY 25, 2017 C,CAMONGA Page 6 opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,662 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Item C —6 DATE: February 8, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Plannel(�) INITIATED BY: Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960 — JAIME CAMPOS — A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 3-lot Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM18626) located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court at 9923 Lemon Avenue — APN: 0201-902-16. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 15 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15315) exemption, which covers minor land divisions of four or fewer parcels. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Time Extension DRC2016-00960 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. BACKGROUND: On January 12, 2011, the Planning Commission approved a request to subdivide this parcel into three parcels. Leading up to the previous approval of the Planning Commission, the project was reviewed and given a recommendation of approval by the Design, Technical and Grading Review Committees on November 16, 2010. A neighborhood meeting was conducted on October 19, 2010 at which no issues were raised. On February 10, 2016 the Planning Commission approved a time extension request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of the previously approved project. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residence; Low (L) Residential District South - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District East - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District West - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential D1—Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960 —JAIME CAMPOS February 8, 2017 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a parcel of approximately 27,400 square feet (0.63 acre) with dimensions of approximately 210 feet (north to south) by approximately 130 feet (east to west). Located generally at the center of the project site is the applicant's single- family residence. There are numerous trees throughout the site. There are single-family residences in all directions around the property. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is approximately 1,576 feet. At the south side, the elevation is generally approximately 1,573 feet. ANALYSIS: General: This application involves a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18626 by one (1) additional year. Upon the initial approval of SUBTPM18626 on January 12, 2011, the approval period was for a duration of 3 years and was set to expire on January 13, 2014. In the meantime, a series of Assembly/Senate Bills (SB 1185, AB 333, AB 208 and AB 116) were passed during the last several years by the State Legislature that automatically extended the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. Per the most recent bill passed, AB 116, the expiration date of any tentative map, which was approved on or after January 1, 2000 and had not expired on or before the effective date of the bill on July 11, 2013, was extended by 24 months. Therefore, AB 116 automatically extended the approval period of SUBTPM18626 by an additional 2 years to January 13; 2016. On February 10, 2016, the Planning Commission approved a request to extend the approval period of the Tentative Parcel Map by one (1) additional year. That approved request extended the expiration date to January 13, 2017. Tentative Parcel,Map, 18626.' Approval/Extension, Approva,(, . Expiration Approving Authority Type Period. A roval'Dat Date Planning Initial Approval Commission PC Reso 11-01 3 Years Jan 12, 2011 Jan 13, 2014 Assembly Bill 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years Jan 13, 2014 Jan 13, 2016 Time Extension DRC2015-01168 Planning Commission PC Reso 16-06 1 Year Feb 10, 2016 Jan 13, 2017 Planning Time Extension Commission DRC2016-00960 1 Year Feb 8, 2017 Jan 13, 2018 Per the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66463.5(c), "prior to the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map, upon the application by the subdivider to extend the map, the map shall automatically be extended for 60 days, or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever comes first." Thus, although the expiration date was on January 13, 2017, the map is still active as an application to extend the approval period of the map because the application was submitted to the City, for review and action, in a timely manner prior to the expiration date. At this time, no changes have occurred from what was previously approved, which involves the subdivision of 1 lot into 3 lots for single-family residential development (Exhibit C). All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in the D1—Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960 —JAIME CAMPOS February 8, 2017 Page 3 Development Code. The applicant is requesting this time extension to prevent the approval period from expiring while the final map is currently being reviewed by the City. In the meantime, the applicant has submitted an application to build a house on Parcel 3 (related file: Minor Design Review DRC2016-00959). This application is also currently under review by the City. At this time the applicant has decided not to build a single-family residence on Parcel 1. The applicant's residence will remain in -place on Parcel 2. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff previously determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions - as the project is a division of residential zoned property into four or less parcels, in conformance with the General Plan and zoning designations, no variances or exceptions required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. A pending application has been submitted to develop Parcel 3 which will be reviewed by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission if necessary at a later date. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: None. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received in response to these notifications. CB:NC/Is EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Site Plan/Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM18626 Exhibit D - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit E - Elevations of the Existing Residence (showing relocated garage door) Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments (November 16, 2010) Exhibit G - Table 17.08.040-B Basic Development Standards Exhibit H - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18626 Staff Report (January 12, 2011) Exhibit I - Resolution of Approval with Conditions for SUBTPM18626 (January 12, 2011) Exhibit J - Staff Report and Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2015-01168 (February 10, 2016) Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2016-00960 D1—Pg3 Fie Seorch 'Leman Ave x Lemon Av pr T � ; paw n r f R' a a [a 3Y§ �Gg G3 AC§ ,jYS of j 8H1 ,3 ❑ s3. of §i s4 E r '. Qi �t 3 �---------=--•-- --- ----J 3C �C yy§ IwG §C § di § i AtlM SdITIHd y wj ggG z• k 01 . VNONfVd j;. @1 g �--• -- ----- ---• yC—1F1nOO Aln AtlO �G § ❑ l0H1N0.7 02300Id i -IOU. NOO BOO- 8 %a §—O�QYyy31i�V- .; 4 9 D1-Pg5 m TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.18626 mwe n srwmnmr [c suct+ r w vuen uw rw .uee w mr [m or wJcw amYaeq mwaao Ili nr-nr. • u w r+mr uw mar ]r, r+u sr, maws n s+v mxxnenno ¢aw.n, su¢ o< aupexwa �r[Ja=r rwwc� _�H 1 I 1, j iLl g2i9Y•fY dTL mpl-Cm•N 1 r, fl 0 I J I LIT A LII vwo," y I I YS m]t]tl•tl r__J _�— d I (T r 1 J I I 1 i lrt T i i L7 Taa-la-t! 1 1 Ld mtlttltld9 _____ 41 1 _ J 1 i 1_iJE tlLITieo] LY c[OBtl•W + i L ------- e i' �Y/JSJ ,r.. .r2`c Jmn our,. .nenruw li D�wL Mi..�ic a n%r � s : rc6+woor"'O`rr LEMON AVENUE�rtvucnorev + lea nn��.�.0 rn.rnxaw a n�ao.i..or v Imxm mn -,rx �rw�ru.v.tw �e •� � m I son nn[n.,.sxu,wn�u'"i.+Ow'W"`.wxr[.e.o>:wwaA L1 :19 am.me wnnx,u rxm]_+.y+r, rum Y. 1 � ar,TexOfl /TM(@Ix[rp r4 Yw Y. PAPCt3_ 1 - L � � �. r+� T,u4. nl mb n6X rMruSnw MVR ny J�ay� w •+mn I� ruu zi•"Rjuesf r� lm 1 L°T°SIJIa1�-}_____ rUY MivcJSra � wr�� x�w[vrnnwr,wr vxr nnL "iIv .=�1 �• m°4.9�Ji j-[.'e �m irae'�`crnxx-.rx nroa aru rw rn ururmw M�QnK4b�nroe 6cuuu Quxl J`•ap0e+(� • ar � 1 � I 1 r_____Z__--_ r________J i y ux xourwe. rrvu«usrmve rr-n�nQcw`nn,m, Q rwJ-ns-,rm o_cyyJnMr p(urp L____� i � ...vJ.rrv>x.nrewY J i LSIT 11] ]1Y]Yi1 +a.,a not cMf M �e� M�ww4gr .K _ IO+vro 6W'I xav%[R C YN T dl [ r ]vY m°tSm.II1 i 2 snuv ave.e're«a . , wn r;m+c rucD Rl w. n..n r--J = _ _ J2 a e sw uvuN a i,.ae w /M w. n/,ar Mtv[ xw rimnmr<cnvrr r -� � � � I ruT.sO m° u] vuna L—_ x ese��—�'-1'� nn ear• i_____t____ Ex%=DA h�,YT W i.--_- r________J 1 LIT 4 1 L_- Lal tll ]9YSF3. +'pp `�'r��,• L9 Yf[Ml tµil JISOI•G]T1S - i AmON'I]LI ___ 1 .......,.wry EXIETtLE..�� VW 1 L______J1 I _ — — — — • - CRY OF RANCHO CUCA r-____ r_______� TENTATIVEPARCE I c SUOTPM 18626 1J] l]i larrlFn J u v5i. TLTr]tn r____ 4 Ja]F5429r I ,�,aAm o• _ !P' ET_ LW l_- 1JY T'[SYJm�II� .. 1 arr..rui i t w :nmWir,+"s. ua:in,.m i L_____ n. L------ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.18626 �rlC .l L/Oha6pV V /WI[![ I W NM8 IUP FG YCr. W iM alY O^ RLUN CIKIINLLL F(M•fga PY. Lfi uW mit ll. ML[ II. p[mv6 L! SL•L S',WLptO 6Vn2 SV IL V U[YMv! ---------- T--- -_ I `Z ' 1v 3uslwri dY mtlFUYf-UI r an L _—__ wry ` i Lai 2 m I Ltl IO Yh ' !JS 50FFY[.9 i Q ' Iovo/un'� ui. L I V • o1 - I nv rns°"�i.6 ionvw, wv x. �k4 �.'.,Y i� a= •'•.w. a � 1 L _ nwi Hain.• LEMON AVENUE rvnma nom� •uT••"a' " _usu�r 1.,a_ _ -- _ 4a.wK Ivw. �-nw:v�yc u'r`rr.:_°new,': ,.«u nw :..• ru,a.c �.o u� - Lrn � . e.. mww•.nr.:.. �i:.Y: � _n : _n�Fa.abrtw FK Y a� � 11 me•. i m tR-„ 1 env.,n rr,.onrw r w:w xn . .• ,�j� 1 pp p��j'�•Y.Y �YN.YL^ll.l"Y A LVI1 - ll]a1YY1.L-}----__ I nrtmra:�sw�m�numn�Jw�t va.-».m v. J<eva v. �i� ri 13 � � ILb� aWl•dV1• .ti.. l�iw uy�omr:o.w, wmx .v uu� aJ.c u.awr..m nv.:: nn • kl 1�p1 xr.na ni anm a awa> L.....aia. I I L O � `i 1 R auto® e.avw eMa iu�r,f N 4[ L----- J .. V � a. _L\_ �'.` I � a°°' m"'"' Tlt� .m Lw! w: w w.m ,u¢� �.....�__— TIW it • ,'•ns..-uw .�.. a.a<. jj .,no,w rn ,•...-¢>,.o.. smut °P ,i -nn ,` G� "'�'� N;1➢Cf➢r, r__--}----- i________J Sj .nn < ,w ra.s:.wmo , 11 7'a, i IF' �-J{_��• yOI• sutra x.___ � 117 sya'ita i _ u �r...wvv vl:r.aw n..r LM `B 1 fIS 0314?!•41 �� w � •••�'1 t 'Lb y.� .1 i pl �] � �.uat�nil 1 noa.4 � n �weaW.wM1 Mue[r ict 03mL MCZo� /`• y �y S ' w"a"w�.mn,. 'I +� +�-•a .vi a➢�::�^�� G�I Lm a�ivm I11 a;,.-.3 : 1N.1 1I iy EXbT. DAY LILT COLF4i x: rtw..r �eL•s.s+Lcds_'�Y=____=___. L ____ Cnass-SECnON LJYJ l :�eueuoare ' 1 asa I-�=eLy. - 7 n f1U/Yirsf "'SL✓'r• Ic�i°sLacAnou 1 L J L __CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I K w"<' s CONCEPTUGMDINGIDHAMAGE PLAN -- -- 1 - W UBTP 18626 S --' i ! Lm 3 L_ `� • l AP➢k 0201-802-16 LU(H i rrrrrtvmu lln 3FJlSYSU r---- a+c err�<u r�oor_uv uwr 11N al9FJ2i9 1 ,:. 11 eaca! w•c. L_l 1 1 ' � i"`sra wra``in+�"rati �1�.`.w •,,. 1. 'AMT FFN�� us.T Ctal:ir w�mwa'rw SECnUl A -A mr. r•io- a SRCTM R-R L—JIV V--, �uo m.oro AA MTI1Tmrif �L) S- �u� �n eN� l� � � ,•• �']—�_._ - secnoN c-c a � e t -linfd' — - '"r >s ,"_•":n� e. rrrr I�JI II� 1 1 1} . SECTQN CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA CROSS -SECTIONS Viol 18R26 OYOF 002-1b a o � r•� wti fi FIPB.P1C -- I a� I muaca m. EXEM O!LOOP FLAN ELOon NORM ELEVATION w E �vooaoov000uo iooaaµ*e�oovi �aoo o`,` ug10puono �a00000vvoouo n rrr. m� m•.cm+.+cru. SC1 ELEVATION .wo- yr-r i I WEST ELEVATY..`N . yr 09'\ (E) HOUSE SUE C I .,!,.1 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith November 16, 2010 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18626 - HP ENGINEERING FOR JAIME CAMPOS -A proposal to subdivide a parcel of approximately 0:63 acre at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court into three (3) parcels in the Low (L) Residential District, located at 9923 Lemon Avenue - APN: 0201-902-16, The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions. Design Parameters: The project site is a parcel of approximately 27,400 square feet (0.63 acre) with dimensions of approximately 210 feet (north to south) by approximately 130 feet (east to west). The applicant's single-family residence is located generally at the center of the project site. At the southeast corner of the site, is a metal shed. There are numerous trees throughout the site. There are single-family residences in all directions around the property. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is approximately 1,576 feet. The elevation is approximately 1,573 feet at the south side. The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into three (3) lots for single-family residential development. The applicant's residence will remain in -place on Parcel 2. The metal shed will be removed. The applicant has not determined 'at this time whether he will construct homes on Parcels 1 and 3 or sell one or both to others. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in the Development Code. Individual lot areas will be 9,635 square feet, 9.105 square feet, and 8,455 square feet for Parcels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The proposed lot areas will be in excess of the required minimum 7,200 square feet and required minimum average of 8,000 square feet. The depth of each lot will be approximately 130 feet, which will exceed the required minimum depth of 100 feet. The width of each lot will be 70 feet, 65 feet, and 60 feet for Parcels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These dimensions will comply with the required minimum average of 65 feet. All of the lots will be conventional in design and will mirror the lots of the subdivision directly across the street (Tract 16431) and to the east (Tract 15726). The most unusual characteristic of the new subdivision will be its relationship with the properties to the south — specifically, the property located at 6339 Daylily Court (Lot 15 of Tract 1(3431). Because of technical considerations such as drainage, grading, and street design at the time that Tract 16431 was developed (between 2003 and 2005), that property is 6 feet lower than the project site. Also, there is a screen wall of approximately 6 feet at the common property line and a retaining wall approximately 5 feet in height parallel to it. Both the grade difference and the retaining wall will remain unchanged. Access for all three'lots will be via Daylily Court. The existing drive approach at Lemon Avenue and the corresponding driveway for the existing house will be removed. The existing garage door on the north side of the garage for the existing house will be relocated to the south side of the garage, and a new driveway and drive approach at Daylily Court will be constructed. Most of the street Improvements along both Daylily Court and Lemon Avenue are already in place with the exception of street trees and street lights. The installation of these improvements will be required by the Engineering Department as conditions of approval. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted on October 19, 2010, at Lions Center West at 9161 Base Line Road. All property owners within 660 feet of the project site were invited. Four Individuals attended this meeting. None of them had any specific objections to the project. There were some questions regarding the sequence of construction and the design of the houses. Staff stated to the EXHIBIT F D1—Pg10 DRC ACTION AGENDA TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18626 - HP ENGINEERING FOR JAIME November 16, 2010 Page 2 attendees that the applicant's proposal does not Include house product; activity on -site would be limited to rough grading (if any) and there would not be any construction activity associated with this application. Staff indicated to those in attendance that any house product wouldbe required to comply with the .design and technical standards established by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commjssior and that, at a minimum, the proposed houses may require review and action by the Design Review Committee. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. The removal of any non -fruit bearing trees on the site is subject to the review and approval of a. Tree Removal Permit. 2. The proposed wall along the north side of Parcel 1 shall be constructed of decorative block. Also, this wall shall be placed a minimum of 5 feet from the inside edge of the public sidewalk. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved, with the above items listed incorporated into the Conditions of Approval, and be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and deemed the application acceptable as submitted The Committee recommends approval to the Planning Commission. Members Present: Wimberly, Munoz, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith D1—Pg11 Article III, Chapter 17.36 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code TABLE 17.36,010-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS "IL... District' VLI :'MH-', H 2 Lot Area (minimum.) 20,000 sf 7.200 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac (1) 3ac(1) 3 ac (1) Lot Area (minimum net avg) 22,500 sf 8,000 sf 5,000 sf 3 ac (1) 3 ac (1) 3 ac (1) Lot Width (minimum) 90 ft (2) 65 ft (2) 50 ft (2) n/a n/a n/a Lot Width (comer lot) 100 ft 10 ft 50 ft n/a n/a n/a Lot Depth (minimum) 200 ft 100 ft 90 ft n/a— n/a n/a Minimum Frontage 50 ft 40 ft 30 ft 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Minimum Frontage (flag lot) 30 ft 20 ft 20 ft 50 ft 50 ft 50 ft 77 AlloWed.Uensity (dwel)lng,qnl�ts p6ir acre)_ Density (3) n/a n/a 4 du/ac 8 du/ac 14 du/ac FMinimum 24 du/ac Maximum Density 2 du/ac 4 du/ac 8 du/ac (4) 114 du/ac (4)1 24 du/ac 30 clujac .Minimum Setback Front Yard (5) 42 ft (6) 37 ft (6) 32 ft (6) 37 ft (6) n/a We Comer Side Yard (5) 27 ft 27 ft 22 ft 27 ft n/a n/a Interior Side Yard (5) 10115 ft 5/10 ft 5/10 ft 10 ft (1) n/a n1a Rear Yard (5) 60 ft 20 ft 15ft 10 ft (7) n/a n/a At Interior Site Boundary (Dwelling/Accessory NR (8) 15/5(7) 15/5(7) 15/5(7) Building) XIMU Primary Buildings 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft (10) 40 ft (10) 55 ft (10) 6t o-,(" - , IL 00V M a w .,.IbUlldirij zfs:a 0. h' Rqrqfk1,Pr.1p o. Lot Coverage 25% 40% 50% 50% 50% 50% , 1 .1 .1 z — Rqi dri r11rr('U 'e& r phtagq p 6e -q Private Open Space (Ground Floor/Upper Story) 3001150 sf 2251150 sf 1501100sf 1501100sf Open Space (Private and Common) 40% 35% 35% 35% Minimum Paflo]Porch Depth 6 ft (11) 6 ft (11) E) ft (11) 6 ft (11) a ft (11) 5 ft (11) 2) !4*04f t Site Single -Family (attached and detached) 1,000 sf Multi -Family (13) Efficiency/Studio 550 sf Multi -Family (13) One Bedroom 650 sf EXHIBIT G D1—Pg12 STAFF YEP®RT PLANNING DEPAin Date: January 12, 2011 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18626 - HP ENGINEERING FOR JAIME CAMPOS -A request to subdivide a parcel of approximately 0.63 acre at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court into three (3) parcels in the Low (L) Residential District, located at 9923 Lemon Avenue - APN: 0201-902-16. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 Minor Land Divisions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residence; Low (L) Residential District South - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District East - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District West - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) ResidentialDistrict B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a parcel of approximately 27,400 square feet (0.63 acre) with dimensions of approximately 210 feet (north to south) by approximately 130 feet (east to west). Located generally at the center of the project site is the applicant's single-family residence. At the southeast corner of the site, is a metal shed. There are numerous trees throughout the site. There are single-family residences in all directions around the property. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is approximately 1,576 feet. At the south side, the elevation is generally approximately 1,573 feet. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into three (3) lots for single-family residential development (Exhibit D). The applicant's residence will remain in -place on Parcel 2. At this time, the applicant has not determined whether he will construct homes on Parcels 1 and 3 or sell one or both to others. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in the Development Code. Individual lot areas will be 9,635 square feet, 9,105 square feet, and 8,455 square feet for Parcels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The proposed lot areas will be in excess of the required minimum 7,200 square feet and required minimum EXHIBIT H D1—Pg13 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM18626 - HP ENGINEERING FOR JAIME CAMPOS January 12, 2011 Page 2 average of 8,000 square feet. The depth of each lot will be approximately 130 feet, which will exceed the required minimum depth of 100 feet. The width of each lot will be 70 feet, 65 feet, and 60 feet for Parcels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. These dimensions will comply with the required minimum average of 65 feet (Exhibit H). All of the lots will be conventional in design and will mirror the lots of the subdivision directly across the street (Tract 16431) and to the east (Tract 15726). The most unusual characteristic of the new subdivision will be its relationship with the properties to the south — specifically, the property located at 6339 Daylily Court (Lot 15 of Tract 16431). Because of technical considerations such as drainage, grading, and street design at the time that Tract 16431 was developed between 2003 and 2005, that property is approximately 6 feet lower than the project site. Also, there is a screen wall of approximately 6 feet in height at the common property line and a retaining wall approximately 5 feet in height, parallel to it. Both the grade difference and the retaining wall will remain unchanged (Exhibit E). Access for all three lots will be via Daylily Court. The existing drive approach at Lemon Avenue and the corresponding driveway for the existing house will be removed. The existing garage door on the north side of the garage for the existing house will be relocated to the south side of the garage (Exhibit-F), and a new driveway and drive approach at Daylily Court will be constructed. The metal shed will be removed. Most of the street improvements along both Daylily Court and Lemon Avenue are already in place with the exception of street trees and street lights. The installation of these improvements will be required by the Engineering Department as conditions of approval. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted on October 19, 2010, at Lions Center West on 9161 Base Line Road. All property owners within 660 feet of the project site were invited; four individuals attended this meeting. None of the four individuals had any specific objections to the project. There were some questions regarding the timeline for construction and the design of the houses. Staff stated to the attendees that the applicant's proposal does not include house product; activity on -site would be limited to rough grading (if any) and there would be no construction activity associated with this application. Staff indicated to those in attendance that any house product would be required to comply with the design and technical standards established by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission and that, at a minimum, the proposed houses would require review and action by the Design Review Committee. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading and Technical Review Committees reviewed the 'application on November 16, 2010. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. Design Review Committees: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Granger) reviewed the application on November 16, 2010 (Exhibit G), The Committee accepted the proposal noting that the overall design of the subdivision was typical, and nearly identical, to the subdivision across the street. The Committee recommends approval to the Planning Commission. Their conditions have.been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the projedt is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions - as the project Is a division of residential zoned property into four or less parcels, is in conformance with the General Plan and zoning, designations, no variances or exceptions are required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not .involved in a division of a larger parcel within the. D1—Pg14 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM18626 - HP ENGINEERING FOR JAIME CAMPOS January 12, 2011 Page 3 previous 2 years, and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. There is no substantial evidence that•the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18626 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. Respectfully submitted, 1o4 /\- Jame . Troyer, AICP Plann' g Director JRT:MS1ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Site Plan/Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM18626 Exhibit E - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit F - Elevations of the Existing Residence (showing relocated garage door) Exhibit G - Design Review Committee Action Comments (November 16, 2010) Exhibit H - Table 17.08.040-B Basic Development Standards Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18626 D1—Pg15 RESOLUTION NO. 11-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM18626, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PARCEL OF APPROXIMATELY 0.63ACRE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LEMON AVENUE AND DAYLILY COURT INTO THREE (3) PARCELS IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 9923 LEMON AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-902-16. A. Recitals. 1. HP Engineering, on behalf of Jaime Campos, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18626, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of January 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on January 12, 2011, including .written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel of approximately 27,400 square feet (0.63 acre) with dimensions of approximately 210 feet (north to south) by approximately 130 feet (east to west), located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court; and b. The project site is surrounded in all directions by single-family residences; and C. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District; and d. The site is partially developed with a single-family residence. Vegetation on -site includes short grasses, shrubs and trees; and e. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into three (3) lots for single-family residential development. The applicant does not intend to construct the homes atthis time; and f. The existing single-family residence will remain in -place on Parcel 2. The existing garage door on the north side of the garage will be relocated to the south side of the garage. A corresponding driveway and drive approach will be constructed to provide vehicle access to Daylily Court. The existing driveway, drive approach and the metal shed will be removed; and EXHIBIT I D1—Pg16 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-01 SUBTPM18626 — HP ENGINEERING FOR JAIME CAMPOS January 12, 2011 Page 2 g.. Individual lot areas will be 9,635 square feet, 9,105 square feet, and 8,455 square feet for Parcels 1, 2, and 3, respectively (these dimensions exceed the minimum of 7,200 square feetwith a minimum average of 8,000 square feet), the depth of each lot will be at least 100 feet, and the width of each lot will be at least 65 feet; and h. As the applicant has not submitted any applications to develop the site, any proposals for construction of residential structures on these parcels will be subject to review and action by the Design Review Committee and, if necessary, the Planning Commission at a later date. These parcels will remain vacant until then; and I. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Daylily Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16431 and all public right-of-way improvements including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter on the east side of the street are present. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed subdivision is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into three parcels and is consistent with the development district of the project site. b. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into three parcels — no development of the site is proposed. C. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in,the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions - as the proposal is to subdivide the property into four parcels or less. Development of the site by the applicant is not proposed. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs In the staffs determination of exemption. Plannino Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a parcel of approximately 27,400 square feet (0.63 acre), with dimensions of approximately 210 feet (north to south) by approximately 130 feet (east to west) located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court into three (3) parcels. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low (L) Residential District 'as described in Table 17.08.040-Basic Development Standards. 3) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the existing metal shed shall be demolished and removed from the project site. D1—Pg17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-01 SUBTPM18626 — HP ENGINEERING FOR JAIME CAMPOS January 12, 2011 Page 3 4) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the garage door on the north side of the existing garage of the existing single-family residence shall be relocated to the south side of the garage. 5) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, a new driveway shall be constructed to connect the garage to Daylily Court, a new drive approach at Daylily Court shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the Engineering Director, and the existing driveway and drive approach shall be removed. 6) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the metal shed shall be removed. 7) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, all lots shall be rough graded to include building pads and interim Improvements (for example, drainage) as deemed necessary by the City. 8) Prior to construction, all future homes and associated improvements shall require the review and approval by the City and the issuance of applicable building permits by the Building and Safety Department. The site plotting and architecture of these homes (and accessory structures) shall require the review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to Planning Director and/or Planning Commission action. 9) All setback lines shall be shown on the Final Map. 10) Double-wall/fence conditions shall be eliminated, if possible. The applicant shall coordinate with the property owners to the east any activity relating to new wall construction along the common property lines. 11) Prior to the removal of any trees on the property, the applicant shall submit a Tree Removal permit and fee for review and approval by the Planning Director or Planning Commission. Erigineerino Department 1) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications, and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) on the opposite side of Lemon Ave shall be paid to the City prior to final map approval. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length from the center of Daylily Ct to the east project boundary. 2) Install Public Street improvements -drive approach, street trees for Parcel 2 prior to recordation of final map. Remove drive approach on Lemon (Parcel 1) and replace with City standard curb and gutter and sidewalk prior to recordation of final map. 3) Prior to any work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid, and a restoration deposit shall be submitted and a construction permit obtained from the City Engineer's office, in addition to any other permits required. D1—Pg18 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-01 SUBTPM18626 — HP ENGINEERING FOR JAIME CAMPOS January 12, 2011 Page 4 Building and Safety (Grading) Department 1) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines, and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines, the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 2) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to the Building and Safety Services Official a Water Quality Management Plan for review and approval, 3) All slope set backs shall comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 4) All swales shall be graded per the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF JANUARY 2011. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: _ /Ilm , �- &jv"UA) JameV. Troyer, A CP, Secreta I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of January 2011, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FL ETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ; OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE D1—Pg19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTPM18626 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: HP ENGINEERING FOR JAIME CAMPOS LOCATION: 9923 LEMON AVENUE — ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its / /_ agents, officers, or employees, because of -the issuance of such approval, or In the alternative, to relinquish such approval, The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense In the defense of any,such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 11-01, Standard _/ /_ Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on .the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all, parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required.to.pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The /_/_ project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X S. Time Limits 1. Tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a 1 /_ complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of -the approval. SC-12-08 I:\PLANNING\FINALIPLNGCOMM12011 Res & Stf RpASUBTPM18626StdCond 1-12.doc D1—Pg20 10 Project No. SUBTPM18626 completion Date Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations Incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, Irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this requeslshall not waive compliancewith all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the projecus perimeter. 8. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. Landscaping 1. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arbodsts recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 1:1PLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMMt2011 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTPM18626StdCond 1-12.doc / !_ —! L_ / I D1-Pg21 Project No. SUBTPM18626 Completion Date 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 160 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. Landscaping and Irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. E. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEWS) F. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan;' C. Floor Plan; d. Celling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water andwaste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTPM18626) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res 8 Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18626StdCond 1-12.doc —I /— D1—Pg22 G. I Project No. SUBTPM18626 Completion Date 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3, Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to / (_ the City prior to permit issuance.. ' 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. / 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTPM18626). The applicant shall complywith the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map _/ / recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. /_ _/ New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Call fornia Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistiveness. _/_/ 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Cade for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial / /� conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. , 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the ! / time of application for grading and drainage Plan review. I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMMl2011 Res 1£ Stf Rpt1SUBTPM18626StdCond 1-12.doc D1—Pg23 Project No. SUBTPM18626 Completion Dale 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the Issuance of a grading permit. J. Grading Comments (See attached) APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477.2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights -of -way and easements shall'be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross -lot drainageJocal feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 3. All existing easements lyingwithin future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed ordelineated on the final map. L, Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and. ordinances, all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures, or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 1:1PLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011'Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTPM18626StdCond 1-12.doc r / / /— / /— / /— D1—Pg24 Project No. SUBTPM18626 Completion Date 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & Street Name Gutter A.C. Pvmt side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Daylily Court (g) (g) (g) (h) (g) (g) n/a n/a n/a n/a Lemon Avenue (g) (g) (g) fe" " (g) (g) We n/a n/a n/a Notes: (a) Median island Includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) if so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (a) modify existing for local street connection (f) maintain existing LIVID area until project is approved/accepted by the City (g) protect in place (h) remove. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safetylights on future "signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required.- C. Pavement striping,marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with poll boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, am aximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion ofthe construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMMt2011 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTPM18626StdCond 1-12.doc —//— f / // !—/ —/ D1—Pg25 Project No. SUBTPM18626 Comolation Date 5. Provide a minimum of 3-inch conduit for future fiber optic use on all streets with connection through the parkway -to each lot or parcel (fiber -to -the curb, FTTC). The size, placement, and location of the conduit shall be shown on the Street Improvement Plans and subject to Engineering Services Department review and approval prior to issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans: Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information,contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow' Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Lemon Avenue Lagestroemia Pink`Crepe Myrtle 3' 20' 24" 4 Indica'Biloxi' Hybrid O.C. box Daylily Court Magnolia N.C.N. 3' 20' 15 Gal 7 Grandflora St. Mary O.C. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils reportshall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 8. Intersection line of sight design's shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, Including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. M. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and' Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be bome by the developer. N. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. . Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt1tSUBTPM18626StdCond 1-12.doc / /_ / I Dl-Pg26 Project No. SUBTPNI18626 Comolelion Date O. Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map, stating that they will be completed upon development. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval In the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 3. Provide copy of final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of grading plans to Building and Safety. W QMP and grading plans are subject to review by the Building Official. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED I:\PLANNING\FINALIPLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Sif Rpt\SUBTPM18626StdCond 1-12.doc D1—Pg27 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection t District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS May 24, 2007 (3) SFR lots SUBTPM18626 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC-2 Fire Flow The required fire flow for this project is 1600 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III -A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. For structures in excess of 3,600 square feet use CFC Table A-111-A-1. 2. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 2. Address: Note on the plans that prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or. externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. D1—Pg28 City of Rancho Cucamonga SUSTPM18626 Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T:(909) 477.2710 F: (909) 477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT & RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS Project No.: SUBTPM18626 Type: Residential Subdivision Location: Southeast corner of Lemon Street & Day Lily Court Planning Department: MICHAELSMITH APN: 201-902-16 F� Meeting Date: November 16, 2010 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: GRC: November 16, 2010 By: Matthew Addin ton FINAL: PC Meeting: Note: Building and Safety — Grading will review and comment ocffuture submitt Is for this . project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans. 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of Califomia to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and rill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the Measures and place a dust control sign grading permit. City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control on the project site prior to the issuance of a 1:1BUILDINGTERMITS4SUBTPM1862MSUSTPM18626 Grading Cemmlflee Project Report. 20101116.dec 1 of 4 D1—Pg29 y : City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM18626 Building & Safety Department _ 10600 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 13) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code, 14) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 15) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 16) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 18) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the,grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; 1:1BUILDINGTERMITSISUBTPM18626ZUBTPM16626 Grading Committee Project ReporL 20101116.doc 2of4 D1—Pg30 r.. City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM18626 Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T:(909)477-2710 F:(909)477-2711 b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: The bottom of the over -excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; it) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and property wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be'cotrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 2) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to the Building and Safety Services Official a Water Quality Management Plan for review and approval. 3) All slope set backs shall comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 4) All swales shall be graded per the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. I:IBUILDINGPERMITSISUSTPM186261SUBTPM18526 Grading Commmee ProjectReport 20101116.doc 3 of 4 D1—Pg31 s' City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM18626 Building & Safety Department• 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of a grading permit. I:IBUILDINGIPERMITSISUBTPM18626\SUBTPhi18626 Grading Committee Project Report. 20101116.dac 4of4 D1—Pg32 f STAFF REPORT --- -r �-; PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: February 10, 2016 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Dominick Perez, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-01168 — JAIME CAMPOS — A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 3-lot Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM18626) located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court at 9923 Lemon Avenue — APN: 0201-902-16. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 15 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15315) exemption, which covers minor land divisions of four or fewer parcels. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Time Extension DRC2015-01168 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residence; Low (L) Residential District South - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District East - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District West - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project site is a parcel of approximately 27,400 square feet (0.63 acre) with dimensions of approximately 210 feet (north to south) by approximately 130 feet (east to west). Located generally at the center of the project site Is the applicant's single-family residence. At the southeast corner of the site, is a metal shed. There are numerous trees throughout the site. There are single-family residences in all directions around the property. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is approximately 1,576 feet. At the south side, the elevation is generally approximately 1,573 feet. ANALYSIS: A. Background: On January 12, 2011, the Planning Commission approved a request to subdivide this parcel into three parcels. Leading up to the previous approval of the Planning Commission, the project was reviewed and given a recommendation of approval by the Design, Technical and Grading Review Committees on November 16, 2010 and a neighborhood meeting was conducted on October 19, 2010 where no issues were raised. EXHIBIT J D1-Pg33 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-01168—JAIME CAMPOS February 10, 2016 Page 2 B. General: This application involves a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18626 by one (1) additional year. Upon the initial approval of SUSTPM18626 on January 12, 2011, the approval period was for a duration of 3 years and was set to expire on January 13, 2014. In the meantime, a series of Assembly/Senate Bills (SB 1185, AB 333, AB 208 and AB 116) were passed during the last several years by the State Legislature that automatically extended the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. Per the most recent bill passed, AB 116, the expiration date of any tentative map, which was approved on or after January 1, 2000 and had not expired on or before the effective date of the bill on July 11, 2013, was extended by 24 months. Therefore, AB 116 automatically extended the approval period of SUBTPM18626 by an additional 2 years. The current expiration date of SUBTPM18626 was January 13, 2016. Per the Subdivision, Map Act, Section 66463.5(c), "prior to the expiration of an approved or conditionally approved tentative map, upon the application by the subdivider to extend the map, the map shall automatically be extended for 60 days, or until the application for the extension is approved, conditionally approved, or denied, whichever comes first." Thus, although the expiration date was on January 13, 2016, the map is still active as an application to extend the approval period of the map because the application was submitted to the City, for review and action, in a timely manner prior to the expiration date. At this time, no changes have occurred from what was previously approved, which involves the subdivision of 1 lot into 3 lots for single-family residential development (Exhibit C). The applicant's residence will remain in -place on Parcel 2. At this time, the applicant has not determined whether he will construct homes on Parcels 1 and 3 or sell one or both. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in the Development Code. Individual lot areas will be 9,635 square feet, 9,105 square feet and 8,455 square feet for Parcels 1, 2 and' 3, respectively. The proposed'lot areas will be in excess of the required minimum 7,200 square feet and required minimum average of 8,000 square feet. The depth of each lot will be approximately 130 feet, which will exceed the required minimum depth of 100 feet. The width of each lot will be 75 feet, 70 feet and 65 feet for Parcels 1, 2 and 3, respectively. These dimensions will comply with the required minimum average of 65 feet (Exhibit D). All of the lots will be conventional in design and will mirror the lots of the subdivision directly across the street (Tract 16431) and to the east (Tract 15726). Access for all 3 lots will be via Daylily Court. The existing drive approach at Lemon Avenue and the corresponding driveway for the existing house will be removed. The existing garage door on the north side of the garage for the existing house will be relocated to the south side of the garage (Exhibit E), as previously conditioned, and a new driveway and drive approach at Daylily Court will be constructed. The metal shed will be removed. Most of the street improvements along both Daylily Court and Lemon Avenue are already in place with the exception of street, trees and street lights. The installation of these improvements will be required by the Engineering Department as conditions of approval. C. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff previously determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions - as the project is a division of residential zoned property into four or less parcels, in conformance with the General Plan and zoning designations, no variances or exceptions required, all services and access to the proposed parcels to local standards are available, the parcel was not involved in D1—Pg34 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DR02015-01168 — JAIME CAMPOS February 10, 2016 Page 3, a division of a larger parcel within the previous 2 years and the parcel does not have an average slope greater than 20 percent. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received in response to these notifications. Respectfully submitt(ed�, Candyce Bur tt Planning Director CB:DP/jp Attachments: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Site Plan/Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM18626 Exhibit D - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit E - Elevations of the Existing Residence (showing relocated garage door) Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments (November 16, 2010) Exhibit G - Table 17.08.040-B Basic Development Standards Exhibit H - Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18626 Staff Report (January 12, 2011) Exhibit I - Resolution of Approval with Conditions for SUBTPM18626 (January 12, 2011) Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2015-01168 D1—Pg35 RESOLUTION NO. 16-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-01168 -A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 3-LOT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (SUBTPM18626) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LEMON AVENUE AND DAYLILY COURT AT 9923 LEMON AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-902-16. A. Recitals. 1. Jaime Campos filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 18626, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 12, 2011, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 11-01, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On February 10, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. .4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on February 10, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel of approximately 27,400 square feet (0.63 acre) with dimensions of approximately 210 feet (north to south) by approximately 130 feet (east to west) located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court; and b. The project site is surrounded in all directions by single-family residences; and C. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District; and d. The site is partially developed with a single-family residence. Vegetation on -site includes short grasses, shrubs and trees; and e. The application contemplates,the subdivision of the subject parcel into three (3) lots for single-family residential development. The applicant does not intend to construct the homes at this time; and D1—Pg36 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-06 TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-0116B — JAIME CAMPOS February 10, 2016 Page 2 f. The existing single-family residence will remain in -place on Parcel 2. The existing garage door on the north side of the garage will be relocated to the south side of the garage. A corresponding driveway and drive approach will be constructed to provide vehicle access to Daylily Court. The existing driveway, drive approach and the metal shed will be removed; and g. Individual lot areas will be 9,635 square feet, 9,105 square feet, and 8,455 square feet for Parcels 1, 2, and 3, respectively (these dimensions exceed the minimum of 7,200 square feet with a minimum average of 8,000 square feet), the depth of each lot will be approximately 130 feet, which will exceed the required minimum depth of 100 feet, and the width of each lot will be at least 65 feet; and h. As the applicant has not'submitted any applications to develop the site, any proposals for construction of residential structures on these parcels will be subject to review and action by the Design Review Committee and, if necessary, the Planning Commission at a later date. These parcels will remain vacant until then; and i. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Daylily Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16431 and all public right-of-way improvements including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter on the east side of the street are present. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into three parcels and is consistent with the development district of the project site. b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west are developed with single-family . residential homes. Most of the street improvements along both Daylily Court and Lemon Avenue are already in place with the exception of street trees and street lights. The installation of these improvements will be required by the Engineering Department as conditions of approval. c. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the 'public health, safety or welfare, or materially. injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into three parcels — no development of the site is proposed. d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one year time extensions. D1—Pg37 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-08 TIME EXTENSION DRC2015-01168 — JAIME CAMPOS February 10, 2016 Page 3 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions - as the proposal is to subdivide the property into four parcels or less. Development of the site by the applicant is not proposed. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and.3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tentative Map Applicant Expiration SUBTPM18626 Jaime Campos January 13, 2017 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 above, this Commission hereby modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 11-01 and the Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to read as follows: The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF -RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:G;) Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: , . Candyce B rnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City. of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duty and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of February 2016, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, MUNOZ, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: OAXACA ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE D1—Pg38 Conditions of Approval RAKCHO Community Development Department �UCAs1C[s'C.\ Project #: DRC2015-01168 Project Name: SUBTPM18626 1-year time extension Location: 9923 LEMON AVE - 020190216-0000 Project Type: Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The applicant shall comply with all special and standard conditions within approved Resolution No. 11-01. 2. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18626 is set to expire on January 13, 2017. Any request to extend the approval period for this map shall require the submittal of an application for a Time Extension request, in accordance with State and local requirements, for review and approval by the Planning Commission. Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The project shall comply with the requirements of the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. www C1tyolRC us Pnnted 1120/2016 D1—Pg39 RESOLUTION NO. 17-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960 - A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 3-LOT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (SUBTPM18626) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LEMON AVENUE AND DAYLILY COURT AT 9923 LEMON AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-902-16. A. Recitals. 1. Jaime Campos filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 18626, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 12, 2011, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 11-01, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. . 3. On February 10, 2016, this Commission adopted its Resolution No 16-06, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 4. On February 8, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on thatdate. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on February 8, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel of approximately27,400 square feet(0.63 acre) with dimensions of approximately 210 feet (north to south) by approximately 130 feet (east to west), located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court; and b. The project site is surrounded in all directions by single-family residences; and C. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District; and d. The site is partially developed with a single-family residence. Vegetation on -site includes short grasses, shrubs and trees; and D1—Pg40 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-12 TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960— JAIME CAMPOS February 8, 2017 Page 2 e. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into three (3) lots for single-family residential development; and f. The existing single-family residence will remain in -place on Parcel 2. A corresponding driveway and drive approach will be constructed to provide vehicle access to Daylily Court. The existing driveway and drive approach will be removed; and g. Individual lot areas will be 9,635 square feet, 9,105 square feet, and 8,455 square feet for Parcels 1, 2, and 3, respectively (these dimensions exceed the minimum of 7,200 square feet with a minimum average of 8,000 square feet), the depth of each lot will be approximately 130 feet, which will exceed the required minimum depth of 100 feet, and the width of each lot will be at least 65 feet; and h. The applicant has submitted an application to develop a house on parcel 3. This development will be subject to review and action by the Design Review Committee and, if necessary, the Planning Commission at a later date. Parcels 1 and 3 will remain vacant until then; and i. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Daylily Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16431 and all public right-of-way improvements including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter on the east side of the street are present. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into three parcels and is consistent with the development district of the project site. b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west are developed with single-family residential homes. Most of the street improvements along both Daylily Court and Lemon Avenue are already in place with the exception of street trees and street lights. The installation of these improvements will be required by the Engineering Department as conditions of approval. c. The proposed subdivision, togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into three parcels — no development of the site is proposed. d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one year time extensions. DI—Pg41 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-12 TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960—JAIME CAMPOS February 8, 2017 Page 3 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions - as the proposal is to subdivide the property into four parcels or less. A pending application has been submitted to develop Parcel 3 which will be reviewed by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission if necessary at a later date. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tentative Mao Applicant Expiration SUBTPM18626 Jaime Campos January 13, 2018 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 above, this Commission hereby modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 11-01 and the Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to read as follows: 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca. Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D1—Pg42 DATE: February 8, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the rPlyng Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Pl INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES — A request to subdivide 1.01 acres of land for condominium purposes related to the site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74. Related Files: Design Review DRC2014- 00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732— RC1 HOMES — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development on a 1.01 acre parcel of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016- 00657— RC1 HOMES — A request to reduce the required street side setbacks by up to 10 percent related to the site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development on a 1.01 acre parcel of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Design Review DRC2014- 00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015- 00310. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016- 00658—.RC1 HOMES — A request to increase the maximum permitted line wall height by up to 2 feet related to the site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development on a 1.01 acre parcel of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Design Review DRC2014- 00732. Minor Exception DRC2016-00657 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015- D2—Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT19918 — RC 1 HOMES February 8, 2017 Page 2 of 7 00310. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2015-00310 — RC1 HOMES — A request to remove 2 trees related to the site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development on a 1.01 acre parcel of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74. Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Design Review DRC2014-00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00658. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Design Review DRC2014-00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310, through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Lot Coverage: 29 percent B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Multi -family Residences; Low Medium (LM) District South - Flood Control Facility; Flood Control (FC) District East - Single-family Residences; Low Medium (LM) District West - Flood Control Facility; Flood Control (FC) District C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Medium (LM) North - Low Medium (LM) South - Flood Control (FC) East - General Commercial (GC) West - Flood Control (FC) D. Project Overview: The applicant proposes developing an 8-unit, multi -family development on a 1.01 acre site located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue. Multi- family developments are permitted within the Low Medium (LM) District and are required to be developed in accordance with the Optional Development Standards (Table 17.36.010- 2). Proiect Site and Surrounding Land Uses: The triangular -shaped project site is currently developed with a single-family residence and a large garage/storage building and was D2—Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT19918 — RC 1 HOMES February 8, 2017 Page 3 of 7 previously used for the storage of construction equipment. There are two trees on the site, a small Washington fan palm and a western sycamore. The Arborist Report submitted for the project (Golden State Land & Tree Assessment; February 9, 2015) recommends the removal of both trees. The palm conflicts with the proposed on -site improvements and the Sycamore shows multiple signs of decay, including an immense hollow cavity at the base of the tree, which greatly weakens the tree's structure. The remainder of the site is covered by a gravel driveway and storage area. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site is Low Medium (LM) District, which permits the development of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. There is a multi- family development within the Low Medium (LM) District to the north of the project site, across 6th street. There are single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District to the east of the project site, across Hellman Avenue. There is a flood control channel within the Flood Control (FC) District to the south and west of the project site. ANALYSIS: A. Architecture and Site Planning: The project is made up of 4 buildings, with 2 units per building. The buildings have a Craftsman architectural design theme, with 2 variations on this theme. Each building includes extensive use of wood siding, pot shelves with decorative corbels and flat tile roofs. The 2 plans vary by eave design and the use of brick veneer on Plan 2. The front entrance of each unit is on the opposite side of the building from the garages, adjacent to the private yard areas. The units range in size from 1,910 square feet to 2,066 square feet and include 3 bedrooms with a den/bonus room, which can be converted to a 4'h bedroom. The maih recreation area is at the southern end of the project site, where the project narrows to a point. The project is not gated and incorporates 3-foot high walls with open wrought iron fencing along both street frontages. B. Code Compliance: The project complies with all Development Code requirements, except for setbacks from 6th Street and Hellman Avenue and wall heights along the west and a portion of the north property lines. The proposed minimum building setback is 33.3 feet along both street frontages, as measured from ultimate curb face. The required building setback is 42 feet, plus or minus 5 feet, along both 6th Street and Hellman Avenue. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00657) to reduce the minimum setback (37 feet) along each street frontage by 10 percent to 33.3 feet, the maximum reduction permitted with a Minor Exception. The applicant is also requesting a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00658) to increase the maximum permitted wall height from 6 feet to 8 feet along the west and north property lines, due to an up to 4-foot grade difference. The project complies with all other Code requirements. The project provides 47 percent open space, greater than the 45 percent required. The landscape plan includes 64 trees, greater than the 40 trees required. Each unit provides a large private yard area which exceeds the minimum 300 square foot required open space area. The buildings are under 25 feet tall, below the 35-foot maximum building height. The front -to -front building setback is at minimum 31 feet, greater than the 30-foot requirement. The side -to -side building separations are at the required minimum 15 foot setback. The project provides multiple recreational amenities, including a tot lot, open play area, BBQ facility and a picnic table with overhead shade structure, in compliance with the minimum code requirement. D2—Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT19918 — RC 1 HOMES February 8, 2017 Page 4 of 7 C. Parking: The project requires 23 parking spaces (2.5 parking spaces per unit; plus 1 guest space for each 3 units) and provides 24 parking spaces. There are 8 open parking spaces along with required 2 enclosed garage spaces per unit. D. Minor Exception Analysis: The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2016- 00657) to reduce the required building setback as measured from the curb face on 6th Street and Hellman Avenue by 10 percent. Staff supports the setback reduction due to the odd shape of the lot, which narrows from 167 feet along the north property line, to less than 6 feet along the south property line. The applicant has also requested to increase the wall heights along the west and a portion of the north property lines due to an up to 4-foot grade difference between the project site and the flood control facility to the west and a portion of 6th Street to the north. The additional wall height will be most visible on the project side of the wall. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: DRC2016-00657 — Setback Reduction 1. Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. Finding: The reduction in the required street side building setback will permit the project site to be developed at the maximum density permitted by General Plan. 2. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed multi -family development is of similar design and density to the residential project to the north and is compatible with the small lot single-family development to the east. 3. Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: The reduction in street side building setback is necessary due to the odd shape of the project site, which narrows substantially from the north to south property lines. The exception will allow for the development of the project site at the permitted density. 4. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. Finding: The proposed reduction in the required building setback is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required setback by up to 10 percent where it has been demonstrated that there are unusual circumstances. In this case the project site is oddly shaped, narrowing from 167 feet along the north property line to less than 6 feet along the south property line. D2—Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT19918 — RC 1 HOMES February 8, 2017 Page 5 of 7 DRC2016-00658 — Increase in Wall Height 1. Fact: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. Finding: The increase in the maximum permitted wall height is consistent with the Low Medium (LM) land use designation of the project site. The increase in wall height will permit the project to provide 6 foot high screen walls as measured on the high side of the wall. 2. Fact: The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Finding: The proposed multi -family residential development is compatible with the surrounding residential development and the increase in wall height will permit the applicant to screen the project site and the private yard areas from the flood control facility to the west and from the public street to the north, thereby achieving desirable site planning for residential land uses. 3. Fact: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Finding: The increase in the permitted wall, height is necessary due to an up to 4 foot grade difference between the project site and the adjacent land to the north and west (flood control channel). It is common practice to permit 6 foot high screen walls between parcels of land. 4. Fact: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. Finding: The proposed increase in the maximum permitted wall height from 6 feet to 8 feet is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to increase the permitted wall height by up to 2 feet where it has been demonstrated that there are unusual circumstances. In this case there is an up to 4 foot grade change between the project site and the public street to the north and the flood control facility to the west. E. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant hosted a neighborhood meeting on September 15, 2016, at the Lions Community Center East (9191 Base Line Road). The applicant provided an overview of the project and fielded questions from the 5 residents in attendance. The questions were related to parking, street improvements, construction timing and estimated selling price of the units. The applicant responded to these questions by stating the following: • The project would provide 2 garage parking spaces for each unit and 8 shared parking spaces • The project would install the full street improvements along 6U' Street and Hellman Avenue D2—Pg5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT19918 — RC 1 HOMES February 8, 2017 Page 6 of 7 • The project would take approximately 1 year to complete once construction was started • The developer would determine the selling price when the first units were near completion. The attendees were generally satisfied with the response, though a resident living on the east side of Hellman Avenue remained concerned about parking overflowing into his single- family neighborhood. Technical Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee (TRC) on October 18, 2016. Conditions of Approval are included in the Resolution and attached Standard Conditions. G. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved by the Design Review Committee (DRC) on October 18, 2016. H. AB52 Tribal Consultation: In accordance with AB52, the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians were contacted on August 11, 2016, and the San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians were contacted on January 4, 2017, to determine interest in engaging in consultation related to the potential impact to cultural resources as a result of the project. As of the date of this report, staff has not received communications from the four tribes contacted. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse, gas emissions, hazards and waste materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Plan Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit D - Grading Plan Exhibit E - Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit F - Landscape Plan D2—Pg6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT19918 — RC 1 HOMES February 8, 2017 Page 7 of 7 Exhibit G - Wall and Fence Plan Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Action Agenda and Comments dated October 18, 2016 Exhibit I - Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Exhibit J - Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2014-00732 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2016-00657 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 Draft Resolution of Approval forTree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310 CB:TV/Is D2—Pg7 m W R SITE UTILIZATION PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19918 Lmnov w W., scnie r=80 � . Ir CLL ENGINEER BENCHMARK OWNER EM,LOPE9 9pILS ENGINEER4` OTRITY COMPANIES WAI llVIl.......o...... :1.:14 N rL)n GurvuumINIUM rllnru5es CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19918 SIXTH STREET ` t� a ..__.. I •., ( ._ ._..., g l ''1 v 20G '— 309 y � a y 9 _ i BT6 'cl�y te1� t l xi \\Y 713 4511 1a 0tlG '%%"r� 04 'Or- GI OA. Ct 4 f •• 1 IL• f , SHOT INDEX 9 8 fH+`L AV, _ y _ --A.:d.n.--. y<-_ .ate. x:A. �•,It .v gj. R LOCAMN MAP f uur r.:a VEW ma rly • 5Lfy14t 9 t a a a a 740TAL 8 a Al 61iE COVERAGE _ I wa nagw a x�m 9.3 IN]LM Ji]]b O[e 1p>\I O aennra>,r IZM an a O ��>, rrso eb►m iWlimC 0 6 fie. r IiW�vy 'sm an fa, I.Nc;. eee a+ n e a 'iW RmSess•M IN! lQ 4it 11 QZL ENGINEER OMERR/v8 ^VELGPER aw �unm [JiLHIiECi / PLANNER BENCHMARK ILSmNFINEER. ..��.—a=.U.—I.—AAAAAA,S I In�MPANIES -ALIAL w.o••� _ nn.v OL6d—Z4 , i3 is /'' -_. ... _ ✓- :... / / /-. n ./�yN ppN ydN ON ' � i J •'... J ,r �A-0 < - i [ Y 1 -.: _ HELLMAN AVENUE-.— Y • Y •o Slyqq ....... � R� 8a� agggo¢g 4 c_aF ;,• ?, 3 °i ; R4�i9l3"fH&S4b�� E 6eli0a!: 6; F x�,�F04 g4pMill NaIjai sSir� a"s GAF ° ,.A x o°axwD coxirms Daorzn eur auxco TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TENTATIVE TRACT HO. 19918 9287 EAST SIXTH STREET ORC201d 7K SUBTi19919 3 1181 HX3 mEP.iEoer MMADOLE .� nw suc P18PKE➢iGt WNBMAINGSL. SlE9'A WEST CWIXaG81191 9J.N. 10-2M 7N1A .. 1 I I mFOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19918 e SIXTH STREET 17 1 kF. ' TYPICAL GNADING _ PPIAC�ERTT0TR91mING I 1 • ee - I p vy03 k\ o HIM LOCATION MAP pa 1 l EARTHWDRK DVANIRIES,W SHEET INDEX CNR ENCIXEER BENCHMARK mnc�uvevinc BOILS^^E-CMEE�� D KRMEYELDPER MT4" COWAm wW w°ww r.�l..i.wn. 7- uvm- CG-01 CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO.19916 lY%GLLONSNES1PEEi 5EC110N 44 rlr SIAINSiHEEi �•-•.•-^• ryrr. � CECIION88• 1p�__,p SECn0M' M P�'1 HEL1 AWWE SECIWN'CC aawc.�swrmm�wwsxvww vwmwomv ail4Yit NOU l OLLWJOI ME I I w w o+.vrw.s.+.nn w.mmr n a.rvw u. v w mm:v�i +v .+ram a sma+-n �: w.ewro a awe vu ugi.�wT an=aiwwaw��wm+o a.++w vna Wvuv •owma�'rcwv o>m�wan �w "wvwyr.wpmunwswv 5�r�vW wr. m� snwpvmW nw.w�.a.•w n Flin w vw wvumu v'+.vv uww a wrvu n w w vw ar wm w n� rm wu.nv w w.�o-.+nwv�w�4r'��nefu� .neap WaO vmrr e.w a. w w..wv v r w s e w'ws oN m6s+awl�w.ww..nw.W�r. Weu wwruuuru9�'.W .w.vum xn M�ww al.aw o+wvf v:euuirvl w ww+W w n3 m•n n �✓m+•n ao nenx3unrn bur uouvneo �1N3btlb3 i Ii L. i :1 19 1 {• w.vwwvmvumneuwnuwwvu.. vc.n IJ •p �:�,� � ..w..a�w.aa......w..a:,w a•��md © � II4-,,i��6 '1i513o P .: Y SE 9 B661'ON 1OVM13N1V1N31 NVId Wd msa N3wo n 033NiSN3 YUIO b33N10N3 511O~S AY IVNIWII3Nd m d N 0 3 FIRE ACCESS PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 19918 I 1 LOCATION MAP SME+ f•x0' q\ Y% M (PVPPOI) LEGM a p ,Z. \ ' > ER ECNMARK cmL [lIOME EN EOILE ENGINEER RA J UMM COMPAMEE \ � rj , WA SLW[0. EI[CIPVIC M wF-01 0 N I LO Ln "" sac rno LGCAMON P IxP I CM ENGINEER RENCMARK ONNERNEYFLOEEN ROILG ENGINEER UERRY COWANIER N1R SCR [I[CIPR� i � m x m BEDR00M1 fOL'XIINO' OPTIONAL BEDROOM 4 P BEDROOM, Iibx/1b' 4 LAUN.� i; i 1 T-�HALL ATHi / 1 MEATH t� 333 0 I 6 q Dliil-BrroiiUS MASTER BEDROOM N'exmwj E SECOND FLOOR - 1076 S.F. ENTRY I ---- � GR-M f94-XIS�e•XISW EoRCH FIRST FLOOR - 834 S.F. PLAN 1 - 1910 S.M= 3-4 BEDROOMS 13 BATH / CONV. DEN / 2 CAR GARAGE HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTTY9918 GARAGE L KITCHEN SECOND FLOOR - 1214 S.F. FIRST FLOOR - 852 S.F. PLAN 2 - 2066 S.F 4-5 BEDROOMS / 3.5-4 BATH / CONV. DEN / 2 CAR GARAGE HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918 S U Z U K I m 0?}A}Olfi I YLHIV I rlJily c BUILDING FIRST FLOOR HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 100A GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA DESIGN REVIEW DRCI014-00782 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUSTT19918 SUZUKI1 09-]9-0Olfi PLAN 1 PLAN 2 BUILDING SECOND FLOOR HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 GRA yO C,UC'MoNGA, CA T/ES 100A DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918 SUZUI(I os.aszo�s BUILDING ROOF PLAN 100A HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918 r.� SUZUKImo z= OTTOIb 1. 37'-6' 3' 36.40 i I I a a i I I ( i ' r r _ ' o 9 OROO9I3 - i ;r I r _ _.._... r r I_� . NI TCHEN a >= 9A 3 GARAGE GARAGE HALL O 0 .\:..� GREAT LAUNi �"\: ROOM ENTRY 7P0 Ir�r HALL ----1 GREAT PORCH ROOM pr b COW. OEM iMTCHEN ENTRY I PORCH PLAN 1 BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN 2 HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBM9916 •ESI,G,N,� PLAN 1 PLAN 2 BUILDING SECOND FLOOR HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 COMU 100B GRARANCHO CfUCAND MONGAMANITIES DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19916 SUZUKI� 09.29 2016 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 BUILDING ROOF PLAN HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 100B GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918 S U ZU KID 0}39Q018 MP w t O N N N 00 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 BUILDING FIRST FLOOR HELLIV AN & 6TH 2.0 100B=ALT GRANDRANCHO C/UC/AMoNGA, CA TIES DESIGN REVIEW DRG2814-09732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918 SUZUKIBM OL]9Q0f6 PLAN 1 PLAN 2 BUILDING SECOND FLOOR HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 100B=ALT GRAND NCHACFIC O C/UCAMON A, CA IES DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918 SUZUI(I m 0s:es016 PLAN 9 PLAN 2 BUILDING ROOF PLAN 100B=ALT HELLMAN & 6TH 2.0 GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA DESIGN REVIEW ORC2014-00732 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918 SUZUI(I M OY]}p16 — IIIM1WNkRFASFUPE— IAM191"RICAl9 \ IRRIGNTD j 'STREFTFPOTSFOI.E f/ VOMER \ATV. SN S ISIA NRREI% MALL IMF%tFt'11V\Sk mnFRnPFIITYI I TS YI.I.AIA4 AVF kM1TI5T1. N � , Tn, A.WPAVWGAT— CAIFR(TN" Vrlll(lE ACCRSEVA1 ONOLI,AP O. SIIIAl1RC —J I 16�S TNExvntnS.R ' -pttTuoltLorAres � nwnr moot r>_ w UCCRFT1C06\9LYS Jy �% •' w T11 m:SCRFPA'Fn ns RR)IIIRPP _ / � LOCAT/ON MAP CLIENT: GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES CIff AM%O%g _—AUPYlAI..0NnrlR0. =FAMELOP uaOLvnrn u:aAR nlFts. SINNTTPers _I STANSA.E :P(111 IAI.,WAIl / SIIPPLLG.fRW 'LLTI\'FAi I1m11MAR TRRI'A lnP HELLMAN AVENUE': w•ti.l LOTS LO�(4 LOTPLAN t PLANAR t LOT', LOT:R. AnI TPAVNIr IN E4IRYWAr MM..TFRdVT.POSSIMERTROmIP JIIIGII $RLr.rxmvl NSOVAYWAU-WCILT IIIUII N'ROWITrIR)N PA .ATOP. T".W'AI GP SEE :NJRED FPOM1T WALL OF.VAT10.N SIICIT P-±1 PPNOI h' NIGII SPLIT' FA@ IIIIX%N.\LL TOI S IIFSNI \ ISItl1I tA(IAINrl Lh1AYAM. d TRASH NkD]'IILVi / A1y \`' OROIII:IIT'I(IIl'RAMr TR1i0.%. SIIRL`IIS.GROIIRM.UVEA$ (O\AETEPM1TIOSL\P 1T E1Lt1 LTT' `� ORVAMLVI'AI.IRON GATCi TORCAR rnaus WmmnsDmlNN uLTAL nacRr+G.nT. PLANLLTIN&LEaEaN4D ro.olP.2 va >r. e J I ne v mi ae \.YR„% au weaemuu ImaxrtK [ n0. F m b uvm } eww uruxearsew hna� r M o� R`A. I�FT1T \K+4R\, i OVERALL PLAN P-1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN Associates, Inc. 8 HOMES - LOTS Io .wels��l�amlm 9267 E. 61M 9T. RANCMo COCAMOu.A. CPLIFORMIA GLn]n E 09.29-16 PPOJEOI ♦ 19.20 (i P � Pv.µ�a li &A+•�IL �� y' CR > I-&.lATi0.IlA6 COMMONARL\STORE LANOSL'APFDANU IRRIO.\TF.O INftI(1_lll)NRPL\NONO NryrFS: ' MLweaAlF.acss2uuvF(..nTAv:.nR cvvummTn AI.TSALsICAlvrvasc nsmL.L IwlvaR:xTNVSIWJ.veviROln x11RIPlGTA LT fAG FP 1 M G M L 9{.IITjI IN[ T r Ull W M nE ,T ENiIn L .. t Y.IIL LLtA A ( NR rt4Q AOLOF Bul L (£RM OF NtPFR a ET M R RA M: 4 AITI YE (Y 'ATLG WIIIry AS GM1InIF.tl'P CL.TaRTG R'RAOByF 151 LLVf1>14F1 A 1.131R ORIYjI'P[ [Mi(1 N50 AI(S PAryJWWIRYLLL l0.Gl M1't LK(Yl.lie IILPE56RNFL r 1 I.Gnll :W(TS. m X W Y I pT[CIIMcm rvFU_R LMIM NYnuTI\L I.1 y t I' W - w ra iam f. IkIllr;llw r.` m . N" Iran ""vm l(n % Ta mnr. rv]P u eni�Kp��ww •ew�Vnl [ v [:tm.vw'vry L cl a• -a- non pmetn. . e-, e- eplxrew m+Flarh p/ann m tv Iculce e! _aen p�cpcty line �rem_vbn Q aeol :la IF,-11' b:'ece -II mwc a •xslo-a eep. eelcr .e bw .a., INTERIORlREAR LOT LINE SPLITEACE AVALL A PILSATER -ELEVATION m 3'-0 W!nreew tie\w 11 u•w u• t hI�11 •or a top. ra�o• !b x ua "6'6• •+ el` 91 a'r 4''coFe�blOCx m:m etw - none�p•I ar to be Ieee..a at Beer prepe.ty ire mta!ecko-. 'STRBLTP MGNI' NALQSTONC PILASTCR ti STEEL TUBE PENCE- ELEVATION 1. ELEVATIONS/CALLS P-2 C `IEH` PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNMM. . • Associates, Inc. w..: ce .•. �c.�o�i+el - B HOMES - LOTS �vu"%u.1.w11aLm.AiM�p`rIM1„ VI'S1 N''a'r6m.lAn'° 1)FSI(iR Mt Vlt\V IIMCI1111JDT12 IFKIAl1VE'RtACE M1IM$lINM111fIW IAI 92O, E. 6TX 9T. RwNCHp CUCwraONOq. CPUr"OUHIt Dg C9 rwva[ 29gfi mY IS.aC 0 N I w w vt GENERAL NOTES •rsanMr.. _.^•._•rria.r• � a uaa Ha..sur+.+a.csis.ru.rrsr rss. grrm..ner•_wrw n....r..nu.rr r""h� q.•wr �w..rr��•ay w.r rn� m_...wwwr.•.ar...a. ry.rr•r _..•r w h a w4tiar ru_rrra•� r T.r.w r r'rrn^+.rawvY •....•.w r ` 4rrrwrr�r rrarwr�rr_rr.w• .r4rrYu.r. µwrrnY T.wr_w+_yw W sl.r�y.r.•.•rr� 94ru•� n•_^r ra.sa9Y.Ta9r n.r•wr...r q W . �.rr mr•r•%w.wr..r..•rrr4.. pnwr.rgr �.+1w .ar_�•+�.a•_wla+•.r. �.wrr_rr�ww_I� rFl.rr wzM•nr�u�i>ws9s aMfwm+ r .rrhr.rr.n w..4 rnYY._a rpir.rurr.w..wrn rrr.sw�r.wMrc.wT"' 4Y_. �w4_ rrwr`�w.�rYla•�.r�i..Pm. rd�w�r.-r.r.r..ne.•r 8-UNIT CONDOMINIUMS WALL & FENCING PLAN 9287 E. 6TH ST. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SITE PLAN I SHEET INDEX wunh avx 1AC00115MV09 c, e �l L0C171 ilnLt N MAP ( NU ) LUAI T SHEET LM LANDSCAPE NOTES = WALL & FENONG PLAN L].UE WALL h FENONG DETAILS , TO, CONSULTANTS: CIVIL ENGINEER MWMf iKS011R9. MC vsm mvsunc ArE swrt m vu(oq wrwwr.Suvmm @tlfA[C M4 [IXI AVBiK 10:4tLa[HYI IXLID ARCHITECT: sviUa UEaoc Kn saaar RWb U W6II CDM.[L I.R M'OIfW sVIVq.'11 lafW/ID+tM OWNER/CLIENT: GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES Np N WANIG ST. SUIIF 950, W6! WVPIA G 9D9fi WNIALNe 9o9I5]&.Ss9 WKEM W fl10ME APPROVALS d C a HELLMAN AVE. 0 N i W Ow WNST TION Wms n C r WALLMENGE LEGEND (` ® MEWw eIEEL rIIDE WR6 MB 4LL GRE BIEEL nb'S.A¢ fEceen86V fd1E A'-m'WOEXOP- (bLPY NY6®A.ffRRim n@ 1 AklitVJUWGM01DE fLWiRGfIW pCi420 MTt WTPLLdT101IW L19 aE0M11C (A1Eg41RZfR TO IVLL oallc-eae slaw rcw exxT IasncK rmorD� prmmxnx am ecTwcnuxAL r¢airamrte. WrEmaR Lmtva Weuexexe slffnelw roxrcrE eLwcomldr ec•Osre oromr w.Ww. Tares•-cewX raoR Tpre PAWi'RT der�Ee 2 ® el.omcrsva ro ne cmrmTwcrnx pErAnn rmR rmruunox ao eEmeenc LRIfEle41<SEA TO CML d'U¢R! NND rRi FXKf LG�-ATWjMTrG rmlexrm eeo eTrstcrvc�L raanmmvee ssx Praro n ow.L emma .'3 DIIEWRI mans$ DM1ITA�m4L-axexnn-eloED e>REer eloee CWRIE BLNCWM sex DM eelLad�car.oydL im ee e•-m•IUR e 0 oaipre aarmeroxE•mT awE�Ee eLmme RePEa ro rwE eoemrRierxn Erau ReR DnTuunw ero meiuene cwrewa rseR Tp emL EWiNEERB rtaeu rwe exAa LouTlaasmrDn ppmulaa nFp eTRlnua4L e�anrma,trn rya sRmo n WCLt erem ® TEFR&1ER ruaLv l u41) ILLaL4rENLE - D• uIGH e D e ID n-elmE lw.Wnl esuTr"-•BLCGK WLLL WIR 4e.�nle el^LrIrACE w.reLaR rare 4 roawara.e• pr arr¢Llm eLoac A toP a aPLnEacE etomcuulL To ee a r uru eTEEI. Tine rEerz rle MLIIPKP ow.t xo ens nxe rwcrn cavxo dYLLNmf EX® 6'-m' fry.1X) MEWGR 0141W T0'OPFET4RWG0NLL-6 XD%4 gECnIW CgC.'1CVC YWWLL.00.� TO CE PaYN pT {JC$Ib rYLllCpffRA1•VJG C}WIIfX. 0 m• rux �R io iue PROTo n flA.mTRIC'rld pErm rae reruuxx rm E.mrDam sLex rrm Exem Lovnw am rooms r aeR3-dee © FERP vtERrl{6VAV.IF,W4Lr{NC£WTLP eP IEfAPDtl ONL.-3'xle4D e6• ID lFOIpE enO W1ad D�De4 W.IFAIF 0 CAP. L0.LR TO DE'eNOGTGT.p' 6T ANR'i6V.92LGCIC a iGP LP e0.11Fad A31MLIIeAC?rYN(pILLL 4C0' UYLL Tm eE A J' 16MI OrEEL n!l RNC2IHE eM1IIFdG! LYLL Ny e.e., nme roueen eWsem Mau elm excti:Eo v-e• nuw 0 .1 TAVATE PILP LM rEwECIM hD� RI R�MLDTM �p aTa.e weLR To ruTa I'ILbTERB Aamae THE arr/a\(\e/t w��ereunax 4ve. •NOfF.. a L W4LGTI MR9 &W1 BE Fl 0-II W SYGT IP T 1ENBIPv^D I'aEQI(2Y, - T WICdL. u• a u• •✓ �R c rtP" 5EE .. _ET L0.O2 FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES ` L� Z� eman G. qmt 5t W f!i GIN m® v� G� Z n z, £=1 2�n QQm Z Ma 3a 'IT/M '13M 3/"09W'17rM a'Ndlnas 21313Y7�M TNM'19S RAOGY TMA 3VVal-ds T M41NU ' �•aw1N37b JI4 dVO lM N315Vl1d TJ33Nb'A 3N015� y ,o nm o��WrO .1. L4w+em ❑q Y Ym,.nom ❑9 Y N$ ��.�m R. n I• .T y va.Y."�s sx � 4 ! v.,.,.s�v••mn G G ✓: i• �^�❑ t � wuaav�H" G f v WY� uN",❑ E Ww�tl�Q 11 rvmiw �•rm ❑Y G � ImWwvn, w❑j 9 �gGwwe.ew • � � e:.m..r :fit .. e....�,..ei© i R6e+s� ,•ten• M1m• •nwao.,wa wrs� t maop•,'av<•�r Ql eAo��w P � d'd0 1IJ010 M TVM T1313WI b dWo IAVOI0 M Ilym NaaLmiN u ` iYO NMOSV /M TdM M11-10i'dOlW3LNI^ •_"m . v" y'�' ,m�m"'q �':�'"a "; � } F ri "..Gw�t.." "�, ....m,,,,. �... � rim [DIP r= E 1•umul mw•m.w,n 0£ t .ns •6f I —El I f 8 r, e azv9 -1331s aeru aaa>. gals rlolblril ' G 9 a [ 6 . I THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA C',aAAMONGA OCTOBER 18, 2016 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Regular Members: Ray Wimberly X Rich Macias _ Candyce Burnett _ Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz X Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, Dominick Perez, Associate Planner; Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner II II. PUBLIC COMMENT .III This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. II III. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS III The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require 1 of 3 EXHIBIT H 7:00 P.M. D2—Pg39 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA CUCmCHO AMONOA OCTOBER 18, 2016 any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014- 00732 — RC1 HOMES — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 8-unit multi -family development on a 1.01 acre parcel of land in the Low Medium (LM) District (4 to 8 dwelling units per acre) located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74; Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19992 — BCA DEVELOPMENT, INC. - A request to subdivide a 41.62 acre site to create 113 lots located within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) and within the Equestrian Overlay District at the northeast corner of Wilson Avenue and East Avenue - APN: 1087-071-31 and -33. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00167 and Specific Plan Amendment DRC2016-00168. C. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2016-00756 - KAMUS+KELLER FOR STONEFIRE GRILL RESTAURANT - A review of a proposed change to the exterior architectural theme and color scheme of an existing restaurant building (previously "On the Border") located in a commercial complex of about 69.9 acres within the Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan, at 10680 Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Aspen Avenue — APN 1077-422-68. 11 IV. ADJOURNMENT 11 The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2 of 3 A. DRC2014-00732 Committee recommended approval and forwarded project to PC. B. SUBTT19992 Committee recommended approval and forwarded project to PC. C. DRC2016-00756 Committee recommended approval. 7:53 P.M. D2-Pg40 Z-.- DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA CURC� ONce OCTOBER 18, 2016 1, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist lI with the Planning Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 6, 2016, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 3 of 3 D2—Pg41 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO .(Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next fine.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909) 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part 11 as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or. consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. INCOMPLETEAPPLICATIONS WILL NOTBE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the.project to which this form pertains: DRC2014-00732 & SUBTT19918 Project Title: 6th & Hellman Townhomes Name & Address of project owner(s): WEST COVINA, CA 91791 RC1 HOMES, LLC - 100 NORTH BARRANCA STREET, SUITE 950, Name &Address of developer or project sponsor: GRAND PACIFIC COMMUNITIES CORPORATION - 100 NORTH BARRANCA STREET, SUITE 950, WEST COVINA CA 91791 EXHIBIT I D2-Pg42 Page 1 of10 l.i 0 Contact Person & Address: ,JENNIFER LANGE - LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 1520 BROOKHOLLOW DR., SUITE 33, SANTA ANA, CA 92705 Name & Address of person preparing this form (if different from above): SEE ABOVE Telephone Number., 714-5.57-7700, EXT 105 Information indicated by an asterisk() is not required of non -construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. `1) Provide a full scale (8-112 x 11) copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site; and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location (describe): SOUTH OF SIXTH STREET, WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers (attach additional sheet if necessary): 0210-341-74 *5) Gross Site Area (ac/sq. ft.): 1.01 ac `6) Net Site Area (total site size minus area of public streets &'proposed dedications): 0.88.ac 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A Updated 4/1112013 Page 2 of 10 D2—Pg43 C , l 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project. N/A 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition) and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.a., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS COMPRISED OF ONE PARCEL OF LAND THAT TOTALS 1.01 ACRES. THE RELATIVELY FLAT PROPERTY IS IMPROVED WITH ONE SIGNLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND A WORK SHED/GARAGE THAT WAS CONSTRUCTED IN APPROXIMATELY 1938. VARIOUS VEHICLES AND TRAILERS SIT ON THE PROPERTY, CURRENTLY. THE SURFACE IS COVERED WITH DIRT AND GRAVEL, AND APPEARS TO DRAIN TOWARDS HELLMAN. PLEASE SEE PHASE I REPORT, ARBORIST REPORT, NOISE STUDY, BIOLOGICAL REPORT, CULTURAL REPORT, AND AIR QUALITY STUDY FOR DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIFIC INFORMATION. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 D2—Pg44 C: C_ 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information (books, published reports and oral history): RECORDS REVEAL THAT 29 PREVIOUS CULTURAL RESOURCES STUDIES HAVE TAKEN PLACE, AND NINE CULTURAL RESOURCES HAVE BEEN RECORDED WITHIN ONE -MILE OF THE PROJECT SITE. THERE ARE NO KNOWN CULTURAL OR HISTORICAL ASPECTS OF THIS SITE. PLEASE SEE 11) Describe any noise sources and theirlevels that now affect the site (aircraft, roadway noise, etc.) and how they will affect proposed uses., THERE IS LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACT OF NOISE FOR THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED SITE. PLEASE SEE NOISE STUDY FOR MORE INFORMATION. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary. - THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL RESULT IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF 8 TOWNHOMES. THERE ARE 4 STRUCTURES PROPOSED, EACH STRUCTURE WITH TWO ATTACHED TOWNHOMES. THE PROJECT ALSO PROPOSES AN INTERIOR STREET, WITH ACCESS FROM HELLMAN AVENUE. THERE IS AN EMERGENCY FIRE ACCESS POINT OFF OF SIXTH STREET, AS WELL. TOWARDS THE SOUTH OF THE SITE LIES A SMALL OPEN SPACE/RECREATIONAL AREA FOR THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY. AT THIS TIME, THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ONE PHASE. 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.) and scale of development (height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): TO THE WEST OF THE PROJECT LIES THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL. TO THE SOUTH OF THE SITE IS A VACANT PARCEL, OWNED BY THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT. TO THE NORTH AND EAST LIES RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES, SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS. Updated 4/11/2013 D2—Pg45 Page 4 of 10 c.. c 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? NO, THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL NOT CHANGE THE PATTERN, SCALE, OR CHARACHTER OF THE SURROUNDING GENERAL AREA OF THE PROJECT. IT IS INTENDED TO HELP THE COMMUNITY AESTHETICALLY AND ECONOMICALLY. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on -site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? THE SHORT-TERM NOISE WILL BE THAT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. TO LIMIT THIS, WE ARE PROPOSING DAY WORK ONLY, ON WEEK DAYS, LONG-TERM, THE PROJECT WILL NOT PRODUCE SIGNIFICANT NOISE IMPACTS ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD. *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: ONE TREE MUST BE REMOVED AS A RESULT OF ITS HEALTH AND THE RISK IT POSES TO POTENTIAL TARGETS. DEVELOPER WILL REPLACE WITH THE LARGEST NURSERY -GROWN SPECIMEN AVAILABLE. PLEASE SEE ARBORIST REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION. 17) Indicate any bodies of water (including domestic water supplies) into which the site drains: THE SITE WILL DRAIN TO HELLMAN AVENUE, WHICH WILL EVENTUALLY DRAIN TO THE CUCAMONGA CREEK CHANNEL. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909) 987-2591. a. Residential (gal/day) 256 Peak use (gal/Day) 300 b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) N/A Peak use (gaUmin/ac) N/A 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank x© Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed; attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily selvage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at (909)' 987-2591. , a. Residential (gal/day) 190 b. Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac) N/A Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 D2—Pg46 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: 8 Detached (indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: N/A Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 8 PROPOSED TOWNHOMES FOR SALE, 4 BUILDINGS TOTAL 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Prices) $ 300,000 to $ 450,000 Rent (permonth) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 3-4 BEDROOMS PER UNIT. PLEASE SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION. 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 4-6 PER UNIT. 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary. 1 b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s) and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: N/A Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 D2—Pg47 C, 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: N/A 27) Indicate hours of operation: N/A 28) Number of employees: N/A Total: Maximum Shin: N/A Time of Maximum Shift., N/A 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City., N/A *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at (818) 572-6283): N/A ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine theirability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so, please indicate their response. YES, AGENCIES HAVE BEEN CONTACTED AND HAVE INDICATED THERE IS ADEQUATE SERVICE AVAILABLE FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT. Updated 4111/2013 Page 7 of 10 D2—Pg48 C 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCBs; radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides; fuels, oils, solvents, and otherflammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, it known. NONE. PLEASE SEE PHASE I REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION. 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary orlong-term use,storage, or discharge ofhazardousand/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. NO. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability, that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga,,,,,,,__ 8/1/15 r spr i /v Date: Signature: . Title: PRINCIPAL Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 D2—Pg49 C I C ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single -Family Multi -Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single -Family Multi -Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 411112013 D2-Pg50 Page 9 of 10 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue. P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 D2-Pg51 Page 10 of 10 , s 11 N y .1 � '� ` •c-�i v "�' �_ �''' ._fix' 6._ � Cr J. �� ILI 0 M > t live ON al fall it I &I I 1lrt .gi- � Oq`'� ry rf�.�• ! 1 4 V =•r i� - � F Ifi 6 �\ o.,TTTf7 in D2-Pg53 ONORY Phase I ESA Project#037-15-001-1 I NIG3066 View of single family residence from E. 6th Street to the north. IMG 3067 View of adjoining property to the north, across E. 6th Street 07129P1015 D2-Pg54 eco��ty Phan I ESP, Project�337-15-001 1 IMG_3068 View looking west along E. 6th Strout from the north entrance to the property. PAG_3069 View from north entrance gate looking south at various vehicles and excavation equipment stored or parked on the Subject Property. 07129/2015 D2-Pg55 IMG_3071 View looking east across the intersection of Hellman Avenue and E. 6th Street from the entrance to the property. IMG_3072 View of truck -trailers stored north and west of the storage shed on the Subject Property. 0712912015 D2-Pg56 ecity Ph3seI ESA ProjectE037-15-001-1 IMG_3074 View from northwest corner of adjoining property to the west looking east across the northern portion of the Subject Property. IMG_3075 View from adjoining property to the west: looking north to south. 07/29/2015 D2-Pg57 IMG_3076 Another view of adjoining property to the west. Cucamonga Creek wash is visible further west. IMG_3091 View of camper trailer stored south of storage shed, 0712g12015 D2-Pg58 IMG_3092 View of camper trailer, truck trailer with backhoe and storage container south of storage container. IMG_3093 Another view of truck trailers parked north and west of the storage shed. D2-Pg59 IMG_3095 View of sand stockpile located on the southern portion of (he property. 1 ,s_3096 View from southwestern corner of the Subject Property looking north. M2912015 D2-Pg60 IMG_3098 View along western property boundary, from adjoining property to the west looking south to north IMG_3102 View of adjoining property to the southeast, across Hellman Avenue. 07/292015 D2-Pg61 I MG_3103 View of surface water drainage Swale along Hellman Avenue southeast of the Subject Property. JNIG_3105 View looking. south to north along the eastern property boundary along Hellman Avenue. 07129/2015 D2-Pg62 Bee ty Phase IESA Project#037-15.001-1 IMG_3106 View looking south to north across the Subject Property. Various camper trailers, storage containers, truck -trailer, and excavation equipment are located in the northern to central portion of the Subject Property, IMG_3108 Another view along eastern property boundary, looking south to north along Hellman Avenue. 07129.2015 D2-Pg63 WORY Phasal ESA Project#037-1 5-00 1 -1 IMG_3112 View from northeast corner of the Subject Property, looking north along Hellman Avenue at E. 6th Street, IMG_3115 View of Subject Property frorn the northeast corner of the property looking south. The single family residence, a vehicle and camper trailer are visible. 0712912015 D2-Pg65 IMG_3118 View of generator observed in the storage shed, IMG_3119 View of fire hydrant located at the northeast exterior corner of the storage shed. 07/29/2015 D2-Pg67 Ir,lG-3120 View of various items stored on the Subject Property that included a loader, 40 yard storage container, a 20 yard storage container, and a utility lift truck. IMG_3121 View of a utility lift truck, 40-yard storage container and other vehicles parked south of the storage shed. ON" Phase I ESA PrujecLI037-15-001-1 07/29/2015 FOM IMG_3122 View of the southern portion of the Subject Property. A stockpile of sand Is visible. IMG_3124 View of sand stockpile and truck trailer on the southern portion of the property. 07/29/2015 D2-Pg69 ecd -ty Phase I ESA Pi rya^t=037-15-001-1 IMG_3125 View of gravel stockpile along the sough i; tsrn property boundary. IMG_3126 A view looking west to east across the southern portion of the Subject Property. A gravel stockpile is visible along the southeastern property boundary. 07/2912015 D2-Pg70 IMG_3128 View of flat gravel surface area on the southern portion of the Subject Property. I MG_3133 View of stored backhoe and truclv'trailer located south of the storage shed. Phase IESA Project:037-15-001-1 07129/2015 D2-Pg71 IMG_3134 View of south side of storage shed IMG_3136 View along west side of the storage shed looking south to north. Various items stored along the side of the shed include: metal piping, hosing, buckets, tires, etc. 07120.'2015 D2-Pg72 IMG_3138 View of two truck -trailers located northwest of the storage shed. IMG_3139 View of various hackhoe attachments that are stockpiled on the ground north-west of the storage shed. 111IM7l 41.1 D2—Pg73 IMG_3140 View of stared backhoe located hi the narthwest portion of the property. IMG_3141 View of various backhoe attachments, piping and miscellaneous pieces of equipment located in the northwest comer of the property. RORY Phase I ESA ProjeeLt037-15-001 1 07/29/2015 D2-Pg74 IMG_ 3142 View of sower manway located in the sidewalk on Hellman Avenue adjoining the property to the northeast. IMG_3143 View of municipal sewer inlet located on Hellman Avenue east of the Subject Property. 601 ty Phase IESA Projectt037-15-001-1 07/29/2015 D2-Pg75 INIG_3144 View of Subject Property from east of Hallman Avenue looking east to west. IMG_3146 View of eastern property boundary of Subject Property, looking northeast to south along Hellman Avenue. BOOBY Phase IESA Project".037-15-001-1 07/29/2015 D2-Pg76 B dirty Phae ESA Projxt4037-15-001-1 IMG 3147 View of single family residence and two camper trailers located on the northeastern portion of the Subject Property. IMG_3150 View of adjoining residential homes to the northeast of the intersection of E. 6th Street and Hellman Avenue. 0712912015 D2-Pg77 City -of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Design Review ,DRC2014-00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310 (APN: 0210-341-74) 2. Related Files: N/A 3. Description of Project: The applicant proposes developing an 8-unit, multi -family development on a 1.01 acre site located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue. Multi -family developments are permitted within the Low Medium (LM) District and are required to be developed in accordance with the Optional Development Standards (Table 17.36.010-2). The project includes a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00657) to reduce the required street side setbacks along 6th Street and Hellman Avenue and a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00658) to increase the west property line wall heights due to a grade difference. The project also includes a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2015-00310) for the removal of two on -site trees. 4. Project Sponsor Name and Address: RC1 Homes, LLC 100 North Barranca Street, Suite 950 West Covina, CA 91791 5. General Plan Designation: Low Medium (LM) 6. Zoning: Low Medium (LM) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The triangular -shaped project site is currently developed with a single-family residence and a large garage/storage building and was previously used to store construction related equipment. The majority of the site not occupied by the onsite structures are covered in gravel and non-native plants. There are two trees on the site, a small Washington Fan Palm and a Western Sycamore. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site is Low Medium (LM) District, which permits the development of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. There is a multi -family development within the Low Medium (LM) District to the north of the project site, across 6th street. There are single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District to the east of the project site, across Hellman Avenue. There is a flood control channel within the Flood Control (FC) District to the south and west of the project site. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe van der Zwaag (909) 477-2750, extension 4316 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: N/A D2—Pg78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-OO732 Page 2 GLOSSARY — The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD — California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD — Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR— Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES — National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx — Nitrogen Oxides ROG — Reactive Organic Gases PMio — Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB — Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD — South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP — Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact," 'Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated," or "Less Than -Significant -Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Biological Resources Greenhouse Gas Land Use & Planning Population & Housing Transportation/Traffic (✓) Agricultural Resources (✓) Cultural Resources () Hazards & Waste Materials () Mineral Resources () Public Services () Utilities & Service Systems (✓) Air Quality (✓) Geology & Soils (✓) Hydrology & Water Quality (✓) Noise () Recreation () Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a 'significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. () I find that the proposed project MAY have a 'Potentially Significant Impact' or 'Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg79 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 3 mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are impo d upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: ' Date: 9I �L Reviewed By: Date: \2-114 I lire Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? () () () (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but () () () (✓) not limited to, trees, rock, outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The site is located on the southwest corner of 61h Street and Hellman Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north and east and by a flood control facility to the west and south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project as the project will be of similar design and density to the surrounding residential development. The project includes the design review of the proposed 8-unit multi -family development, which is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No.87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on site plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or () () (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () () () (✓) Williamson Act contract? Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg81 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g maSources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im act c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re -zoning of, () () () (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or .timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest () () () (✓) land to non -forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located on the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north and east and by a flood control facility to the west and south. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in .the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located on the southwest corner of 61h Street and Hellman Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north and east and by a flood control facility to the west and south. The nearest agricultural use is more than 2 miles to the northwest from the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 6 Less Than SignificantjE Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm Significant Mitigation Im act Inw 11 Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () () (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute () (✓) () ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () (✓) () ( ) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (✓) () ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () () () (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. b) Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health -based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PMio), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.e) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PMio and PM2.5) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (1-12S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include .motor vehicles at. an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also regulates stationary. sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board (ARB). Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg83 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Issues and SupportingInformation Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inco prated Impact Im act The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non -attainment" depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non -Attainment Status for Ozone, PM,o and PM2.e. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's.CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an Air Quality Impact Analysis was prepared by Michael Baker International (November 10, 2016) that utilizes CaIEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long- term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction): Project Emissions and Impacts The project proposes developing an 8-unit, multi -family residential development on a 1.01 acre site located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue. The triangular -shaped project site is currently developed with a single-family residence and a large garage/storage building and was previously used to store construction related equipment. The current improvements will be removed for development of the proposed project. The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Summary of Peak Construction Emissions (Emissions Summary of Overall Construction with Best Available Control Measures) Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fotenpally Significant with Mitigation Than Significant Np Impact Inco eI Im act Im act Table 1 Construction Related Air Emissions Construction Eralsslons -- — - — — Pollutant undslda t ROG NOx CO S0: PMrr PM25 Year 1 (2017) Unmitigated Emissions 234 15.11 10.34 002 1.70 1,17 Mitigated Emissionsr 234 15,11 10.34 0.02 1-19 0.99 SCAOMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Is Threshold Exceeded AkerMitlgation? No No No No No No Year 2 (2018) Unmitigated Emissions 211 13-19 996 0.02 095 0.83 Mitigated Emissions2 2.11 13.19 9-96 0.02 0.95 0.83 SCAOMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Is Threshold Exceeded After Mitlgadon? No No No No No No ROG = reactive organic gases, NOx = nitrogen oxides. CO = carbon monoxide, S02 = sulfur dioxide. PMio microns. PM;5 = particulate matter up to 2.5 microns = particulate matter up to to Notes t Emissions were calculated using the California Em ssrons Estimator Model (CaIEEMod). as recommended by the SCAQMD. 2 The teductionictedds tot construction emission miltgntrons are based on mitigation included in CeIEEMod and as typically required by the SCAOMD through Rule 403 1 he mitigation includes the following properly maintain mobile and other construction equipment, replace ground cover in disturbed areas quickly; water exposed surfaces three times daily. cover stock piles with tarps, water all haul roads twice daily, and limit speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour Refer to AocemSx A, Air OurSN/Greenhouse Gas Data, for detailed model inputibutput data Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO, VOCs, NO,, SO., PMro and PM25 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import), building construction, painting (architectural coatings) paving (curb, gutter, flatwork, and parking lot), and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary (Construction Emissions with Best Available Control Measures) Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg85 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Putemiafly Win Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Im an I act Table 3 Localized Significance of Emissions Source Pollutant (poundstday) F101t GO PMft PMrs Yaat 1(2617) Total Unmitigated On -Site Construction Emissions' 12 76 807 1.54 112 Total Mitigated On -Sae Construction Emissions' 12.76 807 1.03 085 Low ized Signt6r:anre Thresh(AP 1l8 863 5 4 Thresholds Exceeded? No No No No Year 2 (2018) Total Unmitigated Orate Construction Emissions' 1.08 775 0.71 065 Total Mitigated On -Site Construction Emissions' 1.08 775 0.71 0-65 Localized Significance Threshelca 118 863 5 4 Thresholds Exceeded? No No No No Operational Area Source Emissions 0.15 0.77 0.02 0.02 Lor:alized Signirxance Threshold? 118 863 2 1 Thresholds Exceeded? No No No No Notes 1 construction emuslons Include the worst -case on site emissions F w curldrucim Year 1, the budding construction phase emrssioris are presented as the worst.case scenano for NO. and GO, tie gradig phase emssxms arc presented as the wursl-case scenario for PMn. and PM;s. For construUwn Year 2, the building construction phase ern imixls are presented as tce wrist -rase scenam 2 The Localized Sgnlficance Threshold was determmed using Appendix Cold tre SCAOMD Final Localized Slgnikant Threshold Methodology guidance decmlent br pollutants NO.. CO. PM, and PW s. The Located Significance Tlveshold was based m the anticipated daily acreage disturbance for constructim. Itle bfal acreage for olwatonal, Me. d.stanoe to serrtnive mckVicirs, and 16e source receplor area (SRA 32 Refer to Appendix A. Air a&M2reenhouse Gas Emissions Dala, for detailed mcxM "loutpul data Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on -site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions; however, as shown in the tables above, the amount will not exceed any threshold of significance. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut -and -fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project -by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pecancian With With Than Significant Significant No Im ad Incur oratetl Im acl Im act Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCS and are part of the 03 precursors. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 2.34 Ibs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources) during construction. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 Ibs/day. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on -site and existing off -site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA) during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following Best Available Control Measures (BACM) identified in the Air Quality Impact Analysis (Michael Baker International; November 10, 2016) as mitigation measures, short-term, construction impacts will be less -than -significant: 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts: Short -Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on -site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg87 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant "t MdigaKn Tnan Significant No Impact Inca omted Im act Im act would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on -going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM,o) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less -than -significant. This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short-term air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: Rev 3-1-16 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 12 Less Than ' significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant wtn Mitigation Than significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im act • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Pro)ect Long Term (Operational) Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project -related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on -site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. As shown in the following tables, project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds. No long-term, operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Rev 3-1-16 •.: Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 13 Less Then s,gnificant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP gormaSources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Im ed Incarponated Impact Im act Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Table 2 Long -Term Air Emissions Emisskms Source PoliuufanC ndsida nA ROG NUx GO SO. PNIe AreT 432 0.01 0334 005 880 0.02 002 0.00 123 000 t23 Energy Mobil 022 1.07 288 001 040 Total ProposedEmissionse 4.55 1.46 11.70 0.03 L63 SCAOMD Threshold 55 55 5W 150 150 55 Is Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No (Significant Impact) ROG = reactive organic gases: NOx = nitrogen oxides. CO = carbon monoxide; SO? = sullur dioxide. PMto = particulate matter up to 10 microns. PMz; = particulate matter up to 2 5 microns Notes 1. Based on CalE EMod results worst -case seasonal emissions for area and mobile emissions have been remodeled 2 Area sources include natural gas burning fireplaces and exclude the use of wood turning firaptaces and wood burning stoves per SCAOML' Rule 445 (Wood -Burning Devices) 3. The numbers may be slightly off due to rounding. 4 Refs to Appendix A. Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Data. for detailed model inp NoutprA data See Table 3 above for Operation Localized Emissions. Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, all developments would be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less -than -significant level. This City-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. With implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant: 13) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 14) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg90 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sours: PP g Sources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Inca orateI Impact Impact 15) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 16) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 17) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. c) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b) above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR, which are designed to minimize long-term, operational air quality impacts, cumulative impacts will be less -than -significant. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within '/e mile of sensitive receptors in the surrounding residential developments. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less -than -significant levels. 18) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2,5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. e) Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operational odors (Long-term) are not typically associated with the type of use. Odors from the proposed residential development use would most likely be from activities such as the preparation of meals and lawn and garaden care; however, these odors would be minimal and not considered to be significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg91 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 15 Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potemialiy Significant with Less Than Significant Mitigagan Significant No Im act Incorporate Impact Im act 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat () () () (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () () (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () () () (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () (✓) () ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential uses. The project site is currently developed with a single-family residence and a large garagelstorage building. The project site was previously used to store construction related equipment, with a large portion of the site covered in gravel. A Habitat Assessment (Michael Baker International; July 22, 2015 and updated on November 16, 2016) was submitted for the project which assessed the probability of occurrence of sensitive plant and wildlife species that could pose a constraint to development of the project site. Special attention was given to the suitability of the habitat on -site to support burrowing owls and other sensitive species identified by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's (CDFW) California Natural Diversity database (CNDDB) and other electronic databases as potentially occurring in the vicinity of the project site. The Habitat Assessment concluded that no sensitive plant or wildlife species were observed on the project site. The project site has been developed and no longer supports native plant communities. The heavy degree of disturbance and lack of suitable burrows on -site has likely precluded burrowing owl from inhabiting the project site. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg92 Initial Study for I City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 16 Less Than Slgnifi cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially significant with Miligaticn -Than Significant No Im act Inco oratetl Im act Im act Surrounding residential development has isolated the project site from connecting to undisturbed, natural habitats still available in the area. The isolation and disturbance level of the project site limits the site's viability to provide suitable habitat for sensitive biological resources. As a result, no significant adverse impacts to biological resources are identified or anticipated, as a result of implementation of the proposed project. As there are two trees on the project site, the Habitat Assessment recommends that a nesting bird survey be conducted prior to earth moving activities. Staff is also including a mitigation measure requiring a burrowing owl survey to preclude any potential impact on this California Species of Special Concern. Additionally, according to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. With implementation of the following mitigation measures related to nesting birds and burrowing owls, the project will have a less than significant impact on the environment: 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg93 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Signifcant No Impact Incorporate ncor orated Im act Impact measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days,after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only. be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on -site, meaning the project will not have any impacts c) No wetland habitat is present on -site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending "tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere of Influence. Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project site includes one tree, a Western Sycamore, that meets the City's definition of a heritage tree; and one tree, a Washington Fan Palm, that does not meet City's heritage tree definition. A Tree Survey and Arborist Report (Golden State Land & Tree Assessment; February 9, 2015) was submitted for the project that reviewed the condition of the two on -site trees. The survey found that the Western Sycamore shows multiple signs of decay, including an immense hollow cavity at the base of the tree, which greatly weakens the tree's structure. The survey recommends that the Western Sycamore be removed as it poses a liability risk due to its significant state of internal stem decay. The survey recommends replacement with the largest available nursery grown specimen available (typically 24" box). The survey found that the Washington Palm was healthy, even though it is located in a location that conflicts with development of the project site. The survey recommends that the Washington Palm either be relocated on site or be replaced with a 15-gallon nursery stock tree. With the following mitigation measures, the project will have a less than significant impact on the environment: 3) Replace the western sycamore with the largest available nursery grown specimen available (typically 24" box). Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg94 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4) A good faith effort shall be made to relocate the Washington palm on -site. If determined to be unfeasible, replace with a 15-gallon size tree. Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () () (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (✓) () ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological () (✓) () ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred () () () (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? e) Directly or indirectly affect a Native American tribal () (✓) () ( ) cultural resource: Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). A Cultural Resources Assessment (BCR Consulting, LLC; August 2, 2015) was submitted as part of the project which included an archaeological records search at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC), which included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, as well as a review of known cultural resources, and survey and excavation reports generated from projects completed within one mile of the project site. The records search found 29 previous cultural resources studies were performed within 1 mile of the project site. No previous cultural resource studies have been performed on the project site. The Cultural Resources Assessment also included an archaeological pedestrian field survey of the project site which noted the two on -site structures and no other cultural resources. The two on -site structures identified in the survey were a small house (vernacular circa 1948) and a barn/garage (circa 1950). The Cultural Resources Assessment reviewed the on -site structures to determine whether they met the significance criteria outlined in the California Register of Historical Resources. The evaluation determined that the 2 on -site structures did not meet any of the 4 criterion necessary to be listed as a historical resource under CEQA. The Cultural Resources Assessment concluded that there is a low likelihood that cultural resources will be found on the project site and that no further cultural resources work or monitoring is necessary. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg95 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Slgnlficant witn Mitigation Than significant No Impact Incor orated Im act Impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded, on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural' Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere -of - Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating. for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last 'Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg96 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation ,Significant No Im act incorporate( Im act Im act preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is developed with an existing single-family residence and a garage/workshop. The site was until recently used for the storage of trucks and construction equipment. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on -site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on -site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) In accordance with AB52, the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians were contacted on September 9, 2015, to determine interest in engaging in consultation related to the potential impact to cultural resources as a result of the project. As of the date of this study, no contact has been received from the three Tribes contacted. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg97 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: With Than Significant ant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im act 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () () () (✓) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including () () () (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (✓) () ( ) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () () (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () () (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 2 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6 miles north of the site. These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is 13 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to Mw 8.2 earthquakes, is 15 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less -than -significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on -site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust Rev 3-1-16 m3am Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wth Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor orated of act Impact control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMIo emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off - site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended .when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on -site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on -site consist of Hanford sandy loam soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically have low to medium runoff. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg99 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: pp g Potentially Significant Wifh MpigaOan Than Significant No Im act Inco oratetl Im act Im act 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or () (✓) () ( ) indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation () () (✓) ( ) adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance —The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG) emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2) that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N20), hydroflucrocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)). The combined emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (OF) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons .of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure, and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in -State and out -of -State) at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg100 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 24 Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotenuailY wtn man significant Mitigation significant No Impact Incor orated Impact Impact (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to.develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM1o, PM2.5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana -Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, P-Mto, and PM2.5 levels all exceed State and.Federal standards regularly. Proiect Related Sources of GHG's — Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Reseaich (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions. However, a screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year is based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non -industrial projects, as described in the SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans. Project related GHG's would include emissions.from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Michael Baker International; November 20, 2016), total project related emissions would be 181.80 MTCO2eq/year, as shown in the following table: Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg101 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 25 Less Than Sgnificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Fotembany significant with ma'gabon man Significant No Im act Incw waled Im act Im a<t Table 4 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions co, CHr N20 Total Metric Source Metric Metric Metric Metric Metric Tons of Tonslyrt Toni Tons of Tonslyri Tons of CO2eq CO2eg2 CO2eg2 Need Direct Emissions • Constructon amortaed over 30 years 2.55 000 0 00 O.OD 0.00 2 55 • Area Source 5.10 0.01 025 0 00 000 536 • Mobile Source 14106 000 0.00 0.00 0,00 141.06 Total Unmitigated DlrectEmisslonsr 148.11 0.01 0.25 0.00 1 0.00 148.97 Indirect Emissions • Energy 2703 0.'0 0 00 0 00 0 27.03 • Water Demand 3,49 0.02 0.50 0.00 000 4.01 • Solid Waste Generation 0.15 004 1.00 1 0.00 1 0 00 179 Total Unmitigated indirect EmfssionO 31.27 0.06 1.50 0.00 0.00 32.83 Total Unmitigated Project -Related Em1s31ons3 181.80 MTCOre r Unmitigated GHG Emissions Exceed Threshold? No Notes 1 Ellesslons calculated using CaIEEMod 2 CO? Equivalent values calculated using the EPA Websde. Greenhouse Gas Equivalencies CalcuWor, htlp:]A%" run gov/energylgreenhousegas-equivalencies-calculalor, accessed November 2016 3 TolaLs may be si h off due to mundn Rater to dix A Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data, for detailed model inpuVoutput data As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel -powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off -site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site. The combustion of fossil - based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N2O. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Michael Baker International; November 20, 2016) no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, Rev 3-1-16 D2-Pg102 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Impact Im act the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) GHG's Emissions — The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off -site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The project involves the construction of 8 town houses and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several design features including: water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg103 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Ppteniiauy with Than Significant Mitiigaf,n Significant No Im —, In60 n,.I-d Impact m aCl that provide accessibility to public sidewalks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Michael Baker International; November 20, 2016), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation. Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the, project and include the following; Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg104 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact incorporated Im act Impact Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project involves the development of 8 town houses which is consistent with the General Plan. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re -use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping, shade trees, and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent with the sustainability and climate change policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant, unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Based on the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Michael Baker International; November 20, 2016, no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term, construction impacts or long-term, operational impacts would occur as a result of the project. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts would occur as a result of the project. In addition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () () (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg105 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 29 Less Than Signifcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wm Than Slgnifcant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor oraleE Impact hn acl c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () () () (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of . () () () (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an () () () (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) Development within the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes. This is usually associated with individual households, small business operations, and maintenance activities like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds, grease, and oils. These materials would be stored and used at individual sites. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less -than -significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 D2—P4106 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 30 Less Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pnten any With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Im act c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located within .6 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school, Valley View High School in the City of Ontario. No impacts are anticipated. , d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. A Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Report (Ecobility; July 29, 2015) was conducted on the project site and concluded that no evidence' of recognized environmental conditions exist in connection with the subject property and no further assessment of the property is necessary at this time. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan (the Ontario Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan [ALUCP]) according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 and is within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 1.8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according,to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. Per the ONT ALUCP, a real estate disclosure is required. No adverse impact is, anticipated. 1) The developer shall provide all buyers with a real estate transaction disclosure identifying the ONT Airport in the City of Ontario and possible exposure to impacts associated with aircraft operations (e.g., aircraft noise). This disclosure shall be recorded against the property for future transactions. There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind -driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located 'within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg107 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotenilaNy WithThan Signifcant Mitigation Sl gaificant No Impact Incorporated Impact I. ., 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () (✓) () ( ) requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () (✓) () ( ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as O O O (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? O O O (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under'the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Rev 3-1-16 r, D2—Pg108 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 32 Less Than Signifcanl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenuauy With Than Significant Mitigation Significant Na Impacl Inccriaorated Impact Im act Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off -site into receiving waters. Eliminate or reduce non -storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post -construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP exhibit, prepared by Madole and Associates, February 2016, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on -site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm -water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg109 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potenbally With Than Significant Utlgahon significant No Impact Incor crated hr act Im act program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration. program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational: 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City. Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pgl10 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than signifcant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporatetl Impact Impact c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off -site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off -site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a), less than significant impacts are anticipated. , 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Madole and Associates; February 2016, to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. g) The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. All new construction of residential units are required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which require the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm drain facilities or payment of fees for storm drain system improvements. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which requires the implementation of various flood hazard reduction measures. Additionally, the project will be required to construct required storm Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg111 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incor crated . Innioact Impact drain facilities or payment. of fees for storm drain system improvements. No adverse impacts are expected. The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete -lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. All new construction is required to comply with the City's Floodplain Management Regulation which would ensure that future development would not impede or redirect floodwaters and would be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement of structures within the floodplain. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site; therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut 'by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non -significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project., a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () ( ) (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue and is characterized by residential development to the north and east and by a flood control channel to the west and south. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the north and east. The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Low Medium (LM) District. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The Low Medium (LM) District permits the development of multi -family residential development. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pgl12 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 36 Less Than Signifi cool Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incarporatec Impact Im act FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () () () (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (✓) () ( ) excess of standards established in the local general plan. or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () () (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (✓) () ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () () (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the ' project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () () (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build -out. A Noise Analysis (Michael Baker International; February 9, 2015 and updated on November 20, 2016) was submitted as part of the Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pgll3 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S PP g Sources: Potentially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incor orated Impact Impact project. The Noise Analysis finds that the majority of existing noise in the project area is generated by vehicle sources along 61h Street and Hellman Avenue and that the traffic levels on these streets are not expected to exceed 55 dBA CNEL. The Noise Analysis also finds that the construction noises will be short term. As the project proposes the construction of 8 town houses, there would be nominal amount of heavy duty construction equipment associated with grading and construction activities. The nearest sensitive receptor (residential Uses to the east) is located approximately 100 feet from the project boundary and would be expected to interfere with normal residential activities. Implementation of the mitigation measures outlined below will minimize impacts from construction noise as it requires construction equipment to be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation devices. With the following mitigation measures any impacts will be less than significant: 1. Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2. Construction contracts shall specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation. 3. Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g. residences, convalescent house, etc.) to the extent feasible. b) The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations. Construction related vibration may create short term noise and vibration impacts. A Noise Analysis (Michael Baker International; February 9, 2015 and updated on November 10, 2016) was submitted as part of the project which finds that the vibration levels created during the construction phase felt by the nearest sensitive receptors (residences 100 feet east of the project site) would be 0.0004 to 0.011 PPV (Peak Particle Velocity), below the 0.20 inch per second PPV significance threshold. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on -site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided. to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 4. During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg114 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Signiftant Mitigation Significant No Im act Incorporated Im act Im act 5. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 6. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on -site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 8. Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan and is within 2 miles of a public airport. The Project is located approximately 1.8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. Per the Noise Analysis (Michael Baker International; February 9, 2015 and updated on November 10, 2015) submitted for the project, the project site is outside of the 60-65 dB CNEL contour, which is generally along Airport Drive at the norther boundary of the airport. In addition, the proposed project is not considered under the noise impact zone of on the Ontario International Airport. As such, no impact is anticipated! f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2 1/2 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg115 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PP g Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Im act incorporated Impact Im act 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () () (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, () () () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () () () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. The project will include the construction of 8 multiple -family residences. Although the project will increase the population growth in the area, there will be a less than significant impact as the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation. The density was analyzed as part of the build out in the General Plan FPEIR. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. No significant impacts are anticipated. b) The project site is currently developed with a single-family residence that will be removed as part of the project. The single-family residence is vacant and will not displace any housing or people. The project is for the development of 8 multi -family residences. No impacts are anticipated. c) See answer b) above. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other . performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () () () (✓) b) Police protection? () () () (✓) c) Schools? () () () (✓) d) Parks? () () () (✓) e) Other public facilities? () () () (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue, would be served by Fire Station #172, located approximately 1.7 miles north of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg116 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S Pp gormaSources: Potentially Significant with Mitigation Than Significant No Im act Incorporated Impact Impact Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the futuredemand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) The increase in residential units may lead to an increase in calls for service. Although there may be an increase in calls, additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the school impact fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area; currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Golden Oak Park, islocated 0.15 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of .service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in fhe levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project. a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () () () (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, The nearest park, Golden Oak Park, is located 0.15 miles from the project site. This project is not proposing a significant number of new housing units or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg117 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 41 Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation significant No Impact incorporated Impact Ihnact standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a)response above. 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project. a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy () () () (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for . the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management () () () (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or. other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () () (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () () () (✓) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () () () (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 41.44 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the 8 multi -family residences. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each multi -family unit will generate 5A8 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in the project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg118 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially Significant Wm Mitlaation Than Significant No Impact Incor oreted Im act Im acl b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each multi -family residence will generate .78 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. c) Located approximately 1.8 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion of the project and will therefore not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. The project will include space to store bicycles in the garage area to help reduce vehicle trips. No impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? () () () (✓) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or () () () (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg119 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 43 Less Than Signifoant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially WAThan Significant Miligafon Signlficanl No Impact Incorporated hn act Impact d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment () () () (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () () (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed. project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day (mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) Residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg120 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 44 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information S pp g Sources: Potentially significant With Mitigation Than significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; and 8) any project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: 1) A project that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. le) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 18. ' MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the -range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () () () (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg121 Initial Study for aCity of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 ' . Page 45 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PnientiaNy With Than Significant Miligafion Significant No Im acP Inmrporaled Impact Im act site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. A Habitat Assessment (Michael Baker International; July 22, 2015 and updated on November 16, 2016) was submitted for the project which assessed the probability of occurrence of sensitive plant and wildlife species that could pose a constraint to development of the project site. The Habitat Assessment concluded that no sensitive plant or wildlife species were observed on the project site. The project site has been developed and no longer supports native plant communities. The heavy degree of disturbance and lack of suitable burrows on -site has likely precluded burrowing owls from inhabiting the project site. As there are two trees on the project site, the Habitat Assessment recommended a nesting bird survey be conducted prior to earth moving activities. Staff also included a mitigation measure requiring a burrowing owl survey to preclude any potential impact on this California Species of Special Concern. With implementation of these mitigation measures related to nesting birds and burrowing owls, the project will have.a less than significant impact on the environment: b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build -out in the City and Sphere -of -Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation' measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less -than -significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092.and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed -use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction -related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potential impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels during the construction of the project. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less -than -significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses or more effects 15063(c)(3)(D). analyzed in the were addressed may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg122 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 46 were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH92000061027, Certified October 17, 2001), (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Analysis (Michael Baker International; November 10, 2016) (T) Habitat Assessment (Michael Baker International; November 16, 2016 (T) Cultural Resources Assessment (BCR Consulting, LLC; August 2, 2016) (T) Noise Analysis: (Michael Baker International; February 9, 2015 and updated November 10, 2016) (T) Phase 1 Environmental Assessment Report (Ecobility; July 29, 2015) (T) Tree Survey and Arborist Report (Golden State Land & Tree Assessment; February 9, 2015) Rev 3-1-16 D2—Pg123 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Design Review DRC2014-00732 Page 47 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: _ �''� �� Date: 9 Print Name and Title: -HfILC 141COe.i to ewt. N+A644Qe F;fd 3-1-16 D2-Pg124 0 N v La Ln MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: SUBTT18818 Applicant: RC1 Homes, LLC Initial Study Prepared by: Tabe van der Zwaaq Date: December 1, 2016 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance Section..3 AifAQualitY •.-: - .. �.-. _'° ... ' Short Term (Construction) Emissions 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PD/BO C Review of Plans C 2 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was Page 1 of 15 0 N 1 v N rn Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize BO C Review of Plans A/C 4 electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO B Review of Plans A/C 2 standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low pressure spray 10) All construction equipment shall comply with BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of Plans A/C 214 construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul BO C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 roads. • Phase grading to prevent the BO C Review of Plans A/C 214 susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of Plans A/C 214 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of Plans A 4. accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During Construction A 4 established by the City if silt is carried Page 2 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high BO C During Construction A 4 winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During Construction A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PMio) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD.Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During Construction A- 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. Long Term Emissions and Impacts 13) Landscape with native and/or drought- BO C During Construction A 4 resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 14) Provide lighter color roofing and road BO C During Construction A 4 materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 15) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous BO C During Construction A 4 Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 16) All residential and commercial structures shall BO CID Review of Plans C 2/4 be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- Page 3 of 15 Mitigation Measures No.1 Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 17) All residential and commercial structures shall BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 18) All new development in the City of Rancho BO C/D Review of Plans C 2/4 Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions Of PM2.s and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Section 4 logicalaResourcPs' .- :. 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as Page 4 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 conformance with. the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: • Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre - construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre - construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. • During the non -breeding season from Page 5 of 15 0 N i -o La 0 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre - construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 3) Replace the western sycamore with the PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 largest available nursery grown specimen available (typically 24" box). 4) A good faith effort shall be made to relocate PD C Review of Plans A/C 2/4 the Washington palm on -site. If determined to be unfeasible, replace with a 15-gallon size tree. Section.5 ,�ulfural�Resources '�, r- > � ' Page 6 of 15 v w Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of - Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of Report A/D 3/4 require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of Report AID 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with PD B/C Review of report A/D 2/4 Section 21083.2 Archeological and plans during resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse construction project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of Report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. Page 7 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of Report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a _ qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained PD B Review of Report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area BO B/C Review of Report A/D 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth - disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of Report D 3 recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of PD D Review of Report D 3 Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Section .Ql. xGeology and Sods 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During Construction A 4 soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMic emissions, Page 8 of 15 0 N Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re- planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public . streets shall be swept BO C During Construction A 4. according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During Construction A 4 wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMlo emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by BO C During Construction A 4 SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. Section'.? Greeotiouse Gas Emissions, Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO C During Construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select BO C During Construction A 4 construction equipment based on low - emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more BO C During Construction A 4 than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be BO C During Construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered Page 9 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During Construction A 4, interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During Construction A 4 supported and encouraged for construction crew. Long Term (Operational) GHG Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California BO C During Construction A 4 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping. • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation BO A During Construction C 2 strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and Page 10 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non -Compliance irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff .and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of Plans C 2 demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling.' „Section,8._ Hazards.and2N/aste!Mafelials .` :, � .`. - 1) The developer shall provide all buyers with a PD D Review of Report D 3 real estate transaction disclosure identifying the ONT Airport in the City of Ontario and possible exposure to impacts associated with aircraft operations (e.g., aircraft noise). This disclosure shall be recorded against the property for future transactions. Section9 zHydrologyFandaWate,�Qualify ', ', _ -. , .. _ Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically . identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce Page 11 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of - Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D/ Review of Plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off - site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, 'will BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under Page 12 of 15 0 N v w V Mitigation Measures No. / Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post -Construction Operational 6) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D Review of Plans A/C 2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Madole and Associates; February 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 'Section, 12 =-Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a PD/BO B Review of Plans C/A 4 construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated Page 13 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date /Initials Non -Compliance during construction. 2) Construction contracts shall specify that all PD/BO B Review of Plans C/A 4 construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other state required noise attenuation. 3) Construction haul routes shall be designed to PD/BO B Review of Plans C/A 4 avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g. residences, convalescent house, etc.) to the extent feasible. 4) During construction, stationary construction PD/BO B Review of Plans C/A 4 equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. 5) Construction or grading shall not take place BO C During Construction A 4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO C During Construction A 4 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 7) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed PD C During Construction A as early as possible in the first phase. 8) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place PO/BO C During Construction A 4/7 Page 14 of 15 Mitigation Measures No. I Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non -Compliance between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations aRespcnslb(wP.ersorr .. - rtMonito�ing Frequency` - .Method:of Verification - Sanctions CDD - Community Development Director or designee A - With Each New Development A - On -site Inspection 1 - Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD - Planning Director or designee B - Prior To Construction B - Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 - Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C - Throughout Construction C - Plan Check 3 - Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D - Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/ Plans) 4 - Stop Work Order PO - Police Captain or designee E - Operating 5 - Retain Deposit or Bonds FC - Fire Chief or designee 6 - Revoke CUP 7 - Citation Page 15 of 15 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, Design Review DRC2014-00732, Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015- 00310 (APN: 0210-341-74) Public Review Period Closes: February 8, 2016 Project Name: Project Applicant: RC1 Homes, LLC 100 North Barranca Street, Suite 950 West Covina, CA 91791 Project Location (also see attached map): Southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue, (APN: 0210-341-74) Project Description: A proposed development of an 8-unit, multi -family development on a 1.01 acre site which includes a Minor Exception to reduce the required street side setbacks along 6th Street and Hellman Avenue and a Minor Exception to increase the west property line wall heights due to a grade difference and a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of two on -site trees. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. Date of natPrminnfion EXHIBIT J Adopted By D2—Pg140 RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT19918, A SUBDIVSION OF AIRSPACE FOR 8 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF AN 8-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON 1.01 ACRES OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0210-341-74. A. Recitals. 1. RC1 Homes, LLC filed an application. for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of February 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing of February 8, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.01 acre project site is located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; and b. The triangular -shaped project site is currently developed with a single-family residence and a large garage/storage building and was previously used for the storage of construction equipment. All the existing, on -site improvements including two trees will be removed as part of the project scope; and C. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site is Low Medium (LM) District, which permits the development of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. There is a multi -family development within the Low Medium (LM) District to the north of the project site, across 6th street. There are single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District to the east of the project site, across Hellman Avenue. There is a flood control channel within the Flood Control (FC) District to the south and west of the project site; and d. The applicant proposes the subdivision of air space (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918) for the purpose of creating a one lot subdivision for 8 residential condominium units related to the development of an 8-unit, multi -family development (DRC2014-00732). D2—Pg141 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code Low Medium (LM) land use and zoning designations for the project site; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the Low Medium (LM) General Plan land use designation. The related Design Review (DRC2014- 00732) includes two Minor Exceptions, one (DRC2016-00657) for a reduction in the required street side setback and one (DRC2016-00658) for an increase in the maximum permitted wall height. With approval of these related exceptions, the project will be consistent with the Development Code; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site is -located at the intersection of two public streets and will be of similar design and density to the project to the north and will be compatible with the single-family development east, west and south. d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The Initial Study Part II outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less -than -significant; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The subdivision . is for residential purposes, which usually does not cause public health issues; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The project site does not contain any existing easements. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated D2—Pg142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 3 Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of air space (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918) for the purpose of creating a one lot subdivision for 8 residential condominium units related to the development of an 8-unit multi- family development located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue on 1.01 acres of land; APN: 0210-341-74. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. D2—Pgl43 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 4 5) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. D2—Pg144 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 5 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. 13) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 14) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 15) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03, and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 16) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 17) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 18) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the D2—Pgl45 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 6 written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. ' During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 3) Replace the western sycamore with the largest available nursery grown specimen available (typically 24" box). 4) A good faith effort shall be made to relocate the Washington palm on -site. If determined to be unfeasible, replace with a 15-gallon size tree. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: D2—Pg146 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 7 • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in -kind mitigation fee. Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full- time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. D2—Pg147 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 8 Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gasses 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction confractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation D2—Pgl48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918—RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 9 • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables, and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hazard and Waste Materials 1) The developer shall provide all buyers with a real estate transaction disclosure identifying the ONT Airport in the City of Ontario and possible exposure to impacts associated with aircraft operations (e.g., aircraft noise). This disclosure shall be recorded against the property for future transactions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that D2—Pg149 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918—RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 10 shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 6) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall, be submitted to the City for review and approval - prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Madole and Associates — February, 2016) to D2—Pg150 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 11 reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Construction contracts shall specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation. 3) Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g. residences, convalescent house, etc.) to the extent feasible. 4) During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, ,including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 7) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 8) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between.the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. D2—Pg151 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-07 SUBTT19918 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 12 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M, Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D2—Pg152 Conditions of Approval RANCHO Community Development Department GI ANJONCL1 Project #: SUBTT19918, DRC2014-00732, DRC2016-00657, DRC2016-00658, DRC2015-00310 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exceptions, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior. to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 3. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 4. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 6. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. www.CilyofRC.us Printed- 1/3/2017 D2—Pg153 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: Project Type: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 10. Any approval shall expire if .Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 11. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 12. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Hellman Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to west right-of-way. b. Remove and replace curb, gutter, street lights, catch basin, lateral and sidewalk as required. c. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. 2. Reconstruct access ramp at the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 6th Street to comply with current ADA requirements. The City's Standard Drawing 102 access ramp, does not comply with current ADA requirements. The City is in the process of updating our standards however no time frame yet exactly when this will be done. Therefore a detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Printed: 1/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 2 of 12 D2—Pg154 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. 6th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City 'Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to south right-of-way. b. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, access ramp and street trees as required. c. Install one (1) 9500 Lumen, HPSV-equivalent LED streetlight. The street light shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. d. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. e. Access to/from 6th Street shall be for emergency vehicle access only. The Emergency Access shall be 26 feet wide and shall be constructed as a limited access curb per City Std. 105-C. The material to be installed within the City right-of-way shall be reviewed and approved by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. No accent paving allowed within the City right-of-way. f. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be from the centerline of the street. 4. Transition to existing curb and gutter on the west project boundary on 6th Street shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole off -site west of the west project boundary to the first pole west of Hellman Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. . All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. In addition, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite side of 6th Street shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. The fee shall be one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecommunications) on the project side times the length from the center of Hellman Avenue to the west project boundary. a. The existing power pole on the west side of Hellman Avenue shall be removed and existing utility service lines have to be undergrounded. 6. Provide a transition design from the southerly drive approach on Hellman Avenue. The limits of removal and a.c. pavement replacement shall be determined during plan check south of said drive approach. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Printed 1l312017 www.cltyofRC.us Page 3 of 12 D2—Pg155 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name:. 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a 'Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to , the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 12. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. wewv.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/3/2017 Page 4 of 12 D2—Pgl56 Project#: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a' construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer, Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, .unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more . than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made - in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists.. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion' and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 12 D2—Pg157 Project#: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: Project Type: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Hellman Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 18. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. ' The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora'St Mary' No Common Name . Min. Grow Space - 3' . Spacing - 20' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with; City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall- be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement, plans only. 19. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on 6th Street 44 total feet on Hellman Avenue 20. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page of 12 D2—Pg158 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014.00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and otherinterested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Mapping Site Plan' Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8'/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 2. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the' on -site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on -site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on -site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering. any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 4. Fire lanes must be constructed as approved and per the RCFPD Standards, a private fire service may be required for on site fire hydrants. all the homes and garages must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. 2. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 3. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 4. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. Printed; 1/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 7 of 12 D2—Pgl59 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 7. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 8. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation, and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 9. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code. 10. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 11. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and . regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 12. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). 13, Submit two sets of 'structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 14. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation. Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, .fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 15. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 16. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Printed: 1/3/2017. mmr.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 12 D2—Pg160 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE, ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 3. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 4. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 5. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 6. Prior to removing, fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 7. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 8. This project shall comply with the .accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 12 D2—Pg161 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 12. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 13. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for, in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 14. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 15. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 16: A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. v✓Krvv.CilyofRC.us Printed; 1/3/2017 Page 10 of 12 D2—Pgl62 Project#: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo H/ SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 19. The applicant 'shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 20.If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 21. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports .shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 22.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements .prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 23. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 24. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City - Standards for on -site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard _Drawings. 25. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 26. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 27. Private streets and driveaisles for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline profiles. 28. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 29. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed: 1/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 11 of 12 D2—Pgl63 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval, 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot ,get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading 'permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in • the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 34. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a, soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 35. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". Printed: 113/2017 vnvvr.CityofRC.us Page 12.of 12 D2—Pg164 RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 8-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON A 1.01 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0210-341-74. A. Recitals. 1. RC1 Homes, LLC filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2014-00732, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request - is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of February 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing of February 8, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.01 acre project site is located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; and b. The triangular -shaped project site is currently developed with a single-family residence and a large garage/storage building and was previously used for the storage of construction equipment. All the existing on -site improvements including two trees will be removed as part of the project scope; and C. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site is Low Medium (LM) District, which permits the development of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. There is a multi -family development within the Low Medium (LM) District to the north of the project site, across 6th street. There are single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District to the east of the project site, across Hellman Avenue. There is a flood control channel within the Flood Control (FC) District to the south and west of the project site; and The project is forthe site plan and architectural review of an 8-unit, multi -family project. e. The project includes the subdivision of air space (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918) for the purpose of creating a one lot subdivision for 8 residential condominium units; and D2—Pg165 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 2 f. The project also includes a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00657) to reduce the street side building setbacks by up to 10 percent, a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00658) to increase the maximum per wall height by up to 2 feet and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2015=00310) to remove 2 trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented, to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low Medium (LM). The General Plan states that Low Medium (LM) land use district is characterized by detached and attached housing structures that contain either one or two individual dwelling units. The project is for the development of 4 buildings made up of 2 units per building, in accord with the intent of the Low Medium (LM) land use district; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The Development Code states that the Low Medium (LM) District is for the development of 4 to 8 dwelling units per acre. The Low Medium (LM) District permits the development of multi -family projects. The project is for the development of an 8-unit, multi- family project on 1.01 acre site, in accord with intent of the Low Medium (LM) District; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project will be in compliance with the Development Code with approval of the Minor Exception (DRC2016-00657) to reduce the required street side building setback by 10 percent and Minor Exception (DRC2016-00658) to increase the maximum permitted wall height by up to 2 feet; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Initial Study Part II outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project specific mitigation measures that'reduce these impacts to less -than -significant. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. D2—Pg166 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 3 Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for site plan and architectural review of an 8-unit, multi -family development on 1.01 acres of land located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74. 2) The approval is subject to Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918; Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, Minor Exception DRC2016-00658 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00310. 3) The final design of the tot lot play equipment is subject to review and approval by the City Planner. 4) All walls facing the public view shall have a decorative finish (i.e. split face, slump stone, stucco, etc.). 5) All window and door surrounds, soffits, and other similar decorative finishes shall be constructed of wood, simulated wood or have a smooth troweled finish. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at D2—Pgl67 PLANNINGCOMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732—RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 4 least three times a day, preferably in the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 6) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. D2—Pg168 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 5 Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBj) daily to reduce PM,o emissions., in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. 13) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 14) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 15) Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03„ and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 16) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 17) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal cane windows and weather-stripping. 18) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.e and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. if the biologist is D2—Pgl69 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 6 unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non -breeding Season Surveys and Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre -construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre -construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre -construction survey, measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period. These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground -disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre -construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non -breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non -migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre -construction survey, burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. D2—Pg170 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17=08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 7 3) Replace the western sycamore with the largest available nursery grown specimen available (typically 24" box). 4) A good faith effort shall be made to relocate the Washington palm on -site. If determined to be unfeasible, replace with a 15-gallon size tree. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect, undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in -kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full- time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. D2—Pg171 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 8 Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San, Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD. Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gasses 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. D2—Pgl72 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 9 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure.to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non -vegetated surfaces. D2—Pg173 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 10 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hazard and Waste Materials 1) The developer shall provide all buyers with a real estate transaction disclosure identifying the ONT Airport in the City of Ontario and possible exposure to impacts associated with aircraft operations (e.g., aircraft noise). This disclosure shall be recorded against the property for future transactions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during 'construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to 'minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 6) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices D2—Pgl74 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 11 (BMPs) that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by (Madole and Associates — February, 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Construction contracts shall specify that all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, shall be equipped with properly operating and maintained mufflers and other State required noise attenuation. 3) Construction haul routes shall be designed to avoid noise sensitive uses (e.g. residences, convalescent house, etc.) to the extent feasible. 4) During construction, stationary construction equipment shall be placed such that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive noise receivers. Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the D2—Pg175 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-08 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00732 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 12 Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 7) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 8) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9W ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D2—Pg176 Conditions of Approval plt�tliXH�40m Community Development Department Project #: SUBTT19918, DRC2014-00732, DRC2016-00657, DRC2016-00658, DRC2015-00310 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exceptions, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 3. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 4. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 6. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. w .CityofRC.us Pdnted: V3/2017 D2—Pgl77 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval . 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary priorto public hearing. 10. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 11. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 12. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Hellman Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to west right-of-way. b. Remove and replace curb, gutter, street lights, catch basin, lateral and sidewalk as required. c. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. 2. Reconstruct access ramp at the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 6th Street to comply with current ADA requirements. The City's Standard Drawing 102 access ramp, does not comply with current ADA requirements. The City is in the process of updating our standards however no time frame yet exactly when this will be done. Therefore a detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. www.CityofRc.us I Printed: 1/3/2017 Page 2 of 12 D2—Pg178 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. 6th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City 'Secondary' standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to south right-of-way. b. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, access ramp and street trees as required. c. Install one (1) 9500 Lumen, HPSV-equivalent LED streetlight. The street light shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. d. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. e. Access to/from 6th Street shall be for emergency vehicle access only. The Emergency Access shall be 26 feet wide and shall be constructed as a limited access curb per City Std. 105-C. The material to be installed within the City right-of-way shall be reviewed and approved by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. No accent paving allowed Within the City right-of-way. f. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be from the centerline of the street. 4. Transition to existing curb and gutter on the west project boundary on 6th Street shall be . to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole off -site west of the west project boundary to the first pole west of Hellman Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. In addition, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite side of 6th Street shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. The The shall be one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecommunications) on the project side times the length from the center of Hellman Avenue to the west project boundary. a. The existing power pole on the west side of Hellman Avenue shall be removed and existing utility service lines have to be undergrounded. 6. Provide a transition design from the southerly drive approach on Hellman Avenue. The limits of removal and a.c. pavement replacement shall be determined during plan check south of said drive approach. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Printed: 1/3/2077 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 12 D2—Pg179 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering'Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval . or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 12. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRc.us Page 4 of 12 D2—Pg180 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved „by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer 'and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion -of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior.to submittal for first plan check. 14. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/3/2017 Page 5 of 12 D2—Pg181 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Hellman Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as. necessary. 18.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend' on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora 'St Mary' No Common Name Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) .Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 19. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on 6th Street 44 total feet on Hellman Avenue 20. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed: 1/3/2017 v=v.CityofRC.uS Page 6 0(12 D2—Pg182 Project#: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8 .Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8'/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 2. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards: Approval of the on -site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on -site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on -site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to' delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 4. Fire lanes must be constructed as approved and per the RCFPD Standards, a private fire service may be required for on site fire hydrants. all the homes and garages must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. 2. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 3. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 4. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. Printed: 7/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 72 D2—Pg183 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: Project Type: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 6. Openings,in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 7. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 8. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 9. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code. 10. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 11. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 12. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). 13. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 14. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 15. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 16. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. www.CityofRC.us Pdnted:'t/3/2017 Page 8 of 12 D2—Pg184 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 3. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading 'permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 4. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 5. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 6. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 7. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 8. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 1/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 9 of 12 D2—Pgl85 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension • by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 12. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 13. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm " water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 14. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan (s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 15. A 'soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work.. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 16. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. Printed: 1/3/2017 vtm.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 12 D2—Pgl86 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined out and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 19. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 20.If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit, 21. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 22. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage. easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 23. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a details) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 24. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City. Standards for on -site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 25. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 26. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 27. Private streets and driveaisles for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline profiles. I . , 28. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 29. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. w .CityofRC.us Printed: V3/2o17 Page'11 of 12 D2—Pg187 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: Project Type: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm Water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to approval of the project -specific. storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 34. Prior to approval of the final project -specific, water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 35. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". Printed: 1l3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 12 of 12 [103028,01 RESOLUTION NO. 17-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016- 00657, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED STREET SIDE SETBACKS BY UP TO 10 PERCENT (33.3 FEET SETBACK AS MEASURED FROM ULTIMATE THE CURB FACE) RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 8-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON A 1.01 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0210-341-74. A. Recitals. 1. RC1 Homes, LLC filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2016-00657, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of February 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing of February 8, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.01 acre project site is located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; and b. The triangular -shaped project site is currently developed with a single-family residence and a large garage/storage building and was previously used for the storage of construction equipment. All the existing on -site improvements including two trees will be removed as part of the project scope; and C. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site is Low Medium (LM) District, which permits the development of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. There is a multi -family development within the Low Medium (LM) District to the north of the project site, across 6th street. There are single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District to the east of the project site, across Hellman Avenue. There is a flood control channel within the Flood Control (FC) District to the south and west of the project site; and D2—Pg189 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-09 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00657— RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 2 The project is for the site plan and architectural review of an 8-unit, multi -family project. e. The project includes the subdivision of air space (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918) for the purpose of creating a one lot subdivision for 8 residential condominium units; and f. The project also includes a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00657) to reduce the street side building setbacks by up to 10 percent, a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00658) to increase the maximum per wall height by up to 2 feet and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2015-00310) to remove 2 trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: ' a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. The reduction in the required street side building setback will permit the project site to be developed at the maximum density permitted by General Plan. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed multi -family development is, of similar design and density to the residential project to the north and is compatible with the small lot single-family development to the east. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The reduction in street side building setback is necessary due to the odd shape of the project site, which narrows substantially from the north to south property lines. The exception will allow for the development of the project site at the permitted density. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. The proposed reduction in the required building setback is not a grant of special privilege in that the development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required setback by up to 10 percent where it has been demonstrated that there are unusual circumstances. In this case the project site is oddly shaped, narrowing from 167 feet along the north property line to less than 6 feet along the south property line. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the. public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before D2—Pg190 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-09 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00657— RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 3 it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is to decrease the street side setback by 10 percent (33.3 feet setback as measured from ultimate the curb face) along both 6th Street and Hellman Avenue related to an 8-unit, multi -family development on 1.01 acres of land located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74. 2) The approval is subject to Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Development Review DRC2014-00732. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary D2—Pg191 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-09 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00657— RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 4 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D2—Pg192 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: SUBTT19918, DRC2014-00732, DRC2016-00657, DRC2016-00658, DRC2015-00310 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exceptions, Tree Removal Permit AU OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded. copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 3. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 4. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 6. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. w .CityofRC.us Nnted 11312017 D2—Pgl93 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review . ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration. fee in the amount of $2.266.25. All checks are to be made payable 'to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary priorto public hearing. 10. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 11. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot 'overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 12. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Hellman Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to west right-of-way. b. Remove and replace curb, gutter, street lights, catch basin, lateral and sidewalk as required c. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. 2. Reconstruct access ramp at the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 6th Street to comply with current ADA requirements. The City's Standard Drawing 102 access ramp, does not comply with current ADA requirements. The City is in the process of updating our standards however no time frame yet exactly when this will be done. Therefore a detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 12 D2—Pg194 Project#: . DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287.6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. 6th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City 'Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to south right-of-way. b. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, access ramp and street trees as required. c. Install one (1) 9500 Lumen, HPSV-equivalent LED streetlight. The street light shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. d. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. e. Access to/from 6th Street shall be for emergency vehicle access only. The Emergency Access shall be 26 feet wide and shall be constructed as a limited access curb per City Std. 105-C. The material to be installed within the City right-of-way shall be reviewed and approved by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. No accent paving allowed within the City right-of-way. f. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be from the centerline of the street. 4. Transition to existing curb and gutter on the west project boundary on 6th Street shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole off -site west of the west project boundary to the first pole west of Hellman Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. In addition, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite side of 6th Street shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. The fee shall be one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecommunications) on the project side times the length from the center of Hellman Avenue to the west project boundary. a. The existing power pole on the west side of Hellman Avenue shall be removed and existing utility service lines have to be undergrounded. 6. Provide a transition design from the southerly drive approach on Hellman Avenue. The limits of removal and a.c. pavement replacement shall be determined during plan check south of said drive approach. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 113/2017 Page 3 of 12 D2—Pg195 Project #R: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: Project Type: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A non-refundable .deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and- demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion. of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final -map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 12. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. Panted: 1/3/2017 www.cayofRc.us Page 4 of 12 D2—Pg196 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit; and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes . shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of .energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. w .CityofRC.us Printed: 1/3/2017 Page 5 of 12 D2—Pg197 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review I_!►AF4riTMA1,V4F"AFti7%/►�[�Zdi]►rIJi![�J►�l��_I77A�iC��l1�I71Z�1►IXi�� Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Hellman Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 18.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines an 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora'St Mary' No Common Name Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Size - 15 gallon d Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 19. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on 6th Street 44 total feet on Hellman Avenue 20. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed: e .Cftyofnc.us 1/3/2017 Page 6 of 12 D2-Pg198 Project#: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo H/ SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval _ 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8'/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan. must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 2. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on -site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on -site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on -site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 4. Fire lanes must be constructed as approved and per the RCFPD Standards, a private fire service may be required for on site fire hydrants. all the homes and garages must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. 2. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 3. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 4. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. w .CityofRC.us Printed 102017 Page 7 of 12 D2—Pg199 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 7. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 8. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 9. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code. 10. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 11. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 12. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). 13. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 14. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 15. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 16. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 12 D2—Pg200 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Onit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0060 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 3. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 4. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 5. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 6. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 7. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan .(WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 8. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 12 D2—Pg201 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and, Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: 'Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the- grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;. b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading,' the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11..Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 12. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 13. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality 'structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan, 14. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and. Drainage Plan. 15. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 16. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. vnvw.Cityol`Rc.us Panted: 1l3/2017 Page'10 of 12 D2—Pg202 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo H/ SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yardsor more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 19. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 20.If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 21. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 22.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 23.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 24. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 25. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 26. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 27. Private streets and driveaisles for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline profiles. 28. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 29. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed: 1/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 11 of 12 D2—Pg203 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST = 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm, water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance. of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and, Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 34. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 35. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 12 D2—Pg204 RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016= 00658, A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED LINE WALL HEIGHT BY UP TO 2 FEET (MAXIMUM PERMITTED CALCULATED HEIGHT OF 8 FEET) RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 8-UNIT, MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON A 1.01. ACRE PARCEL OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0210-341-74. A. Recitals. 1. RC1 Homes, LLC filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2016-00658, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,, the subject Minor Exception request.is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of February 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing of February 8, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.01 acre project site is located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; and b. The triangular -shaped project site is currently developed with a single-family residence and a large garage/storage building and was previously used for the storage of construction equipment. All the existing on -site improvements including two trees will be removed as part of the project scope; and C. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site is Low Medium (LM) District, which permits the development of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. There is a multi -family development within the Low Medium (LM) District to the north of the project site, across 6th street. There are single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District to the east of the project site, across Hellman Avenue. There is a flood control channel within the Flood Control (FC) District to the south and west of the project site; and D2—Pg205 ' PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00658— RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 2 d. The project is for the site plan and architectural review of an 8-unit, multi -family project e. The project includes the subdivision of air space (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918) for the purpose of creating a one lot subdivision for 8 residential condominium units; and f. The project also includes a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00657) to reduce the street side building setbacks by up to 10 percent, a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00658) to increase the maximum per wall, height by up to 2 feet and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2015-00310) to remove 2 trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. The increase in the maximum permitted wall height is consistent with the Low Medium (LM) land use designation of the project site. The increase in wall height will permit the project to provide 6-foot high screen walls as measured on the high side of the wall. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed multi -family residential development is compatible with the surrounding residential development and the increase in wall height will permit the applicant to screen the project site and the private yard areas from the flood control facility to the west and from the public street to the north. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The increase in the permitted wall height is necessary due to an up to 4 foot grade difference between the project site and the adjacent land to the north and west. It is common practice to permit a Minor Exception of up to 2 feet where there is a grade difference between adjacent parcels of land. The additional wall height will permit a 6-foot high screen wall on top of the up to 4-foot high retaining wall. d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district and will not be detrimental to public health safety or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvement in the vicinity. The proposed increase in the maximum permitted wall height from 6 feet to 8 feet is not a grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to increase the permitted wall height by up to 2 feet where it has been demonstrated that there are unusual circumstances. In this case there is an up to 4 foot grade change between the project site and the public street to the north and the flood control facility to the west. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to -the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was D2—Pg206 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00658— RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 3 prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is to permit an 8-foot high combination wall consisting of an up to 4- foot high retaining wall topped by a 6-foot high free standing wall related to an 8-unit, multi -family development on 1.01 acres of land located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74. 2) The approval is subject to Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Development Review DRC2014-00732. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. D2—Pg207 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00658— RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 4" APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AN ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,. passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February 2017,'by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D2—Pg208 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: SUBTT19918, DRC2014-00732, DRC2016-00657, DRC2016-00658, DRC2015-00310 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exceptions, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 3. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 4. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 6. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. �.cltyofRc.uS Pfinte& 1/312017 D2—Pg209 Project 9: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 10. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 11. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 12. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Hellman Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to west right-of-way. b. Remove and replace curb, gutter, street lights, catch basin, lateral and sidewalk as required. c. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. 2. Reconstruct access ramp at the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 6th Street to comply with current ADA requirements. The City's Standard Drawing 102 access ramp, does not comply with current ADA requirements. The City is in the process of updating our standards however no time frame yet exactly when this will be done. Therefore a detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. vnvw.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/3/2017 Page 2 o(72 D2—Pg210 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. 6th Street frontage improyements to be in accordance with City 'Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to south right-of-way. b. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, access ramp and street trees as required. c. Install one (1) 9500 Lumen, HPSV-equivalent LED streetlight. The street light shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. d. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. e. Access to/from 6th Street shall be for emergency vehicle access only. The Emergency Access shall be 26 feet wide and shall be constructed as a limited access curb per City Std. 105-C. The material to be installed within the City right-of-way shall be reviewed and approved by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. No accent paving allowed within the City right-of-way. f. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be from the centerline of the street. 4. Transition to existing curb and gutter on the west project boundary on 6th Street shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole off -site west of the west project. boundary to the first pole west of Hellman Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. In addition, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite side of 6th Street shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. The fee shall be one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities (electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecommunications) on the project side times the length from the center of Hellman Avenue to the west project boundary. a. The existing power pole on the west side of Hellman Avenue shall be removed and existing utility service lines have to be undergrounded. 6. Provide a transition design from the southerly drive approach on Hellman Avenue. The limits of removal and a.c. pavement replacement shall be determined during plan check south of said drive approach. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/3/2017 page 3 0112 D2—Pg211 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval ' 8. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for -the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts, shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and construbted to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, • and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 12. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. Printed: 1/3/2017 ewvw.CiryofRC.us Page 4 of 12 D2—Pg212 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety, lights on future signal poles,, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an . agreement -executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. ' g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. . 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the . City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Pnnted: 1/3/2017 YA .CltyofRC.us Page 5 of 12 D2—Pg213 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ' ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Hellman Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 18.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall -include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street 'trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora'St Mary' No Common Name Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 19. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way . on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on 6th Street 44 total feet on Hellman Avenue 20. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed:.1/3/2077 �.CityofRC.us Page fi.of 12 D2—Pg214 Project#: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Enqineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8'/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 2. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on -site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on -site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on -site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 4. Fire lanes must be constructed as approved and per the RCFPD Standards, a private fire service may be required for on site fire hydrants. all the homes and garages must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. 2. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 3. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 4. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. w .CityofRC.us Printed: 1/3/2017 Page 7 of 12 D2—Pg215 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location:. 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 7. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 8. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 9. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code. 10. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, .Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 11. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 12. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). 13. Submit two sets of structural calculation's, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 14. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 15. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 16. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Printed vrvw.CityofRC.us 1/3/2017 Page 8 of 12 D2—Pg216 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall -be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 3. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 4. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 5. Prior to . issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions, of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 6. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 7. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 8. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 1/3/2077 w .CfryofRC.us Page '9 of 12 D2—Pg217 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the ,Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 12. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 13. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the 'issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 14. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code; City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 15. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal, for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 16. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 17. The .final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/3/2017 Page 10 of 12 D2—Pg218 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 19. The applicant shall .comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 20.If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 21. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage .shall be .prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All.reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 22.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 23.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 24. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible; and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 25. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 26. Private sewer, water, and storm. drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 27. Private streets and driveaisles for multifamily developments will include street plans as 'part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline profiles. 28. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 29. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed:.1/3/2017 wrvw.CityofRC.us page 17 of 12 D2—Pg219 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to Submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment. device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential Subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to .the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval- of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the .final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location . and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structure's and drainage of the site. 34. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 35. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the* current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality.- The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, , ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors'. www.CityofRC.us Printed:d/3/2g17 Page 12 of 12 D2—Pg220 RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2015-00310, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 2 TREES RELATED TO THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 8-UNIT, MULTI- FAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON A 1.01 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND IN THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) DISTRICT (4 TO 8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 6TH STREET AND HELLMAN AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0210-341-74. A. Recitals. 1. RC1 Homes, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2015- 00310, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of February 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing of February 8, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.01 acre project site is located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; and b. The triangular -shaped project site is currently developed with a single-family residence and a large garage/storage building and was previously used for the storage of construction equipment. All the existing on -site improvements including two trees will be removed as part of the project scope; and C. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site is Low Medium (LM) District, which permits the development of up to 8 dwelling units per acre. There is a multi -family development within the Low Medium (LM) District to the north of the project site, across 6th street. There are single-family residences within the Low Medium (LM) District to the east of the project site, across Hellman Avenue. There is a flood control channel within the Flood Control (FC) District to the south and west of the project site; and d. The project is for the site plan and architectural review of an 8-unit, multi -family project. e. The project includes the subdivision of air space (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918) for the purpose of creating a one lot subdivision for 8 residential condominium units; and D2—Pg221 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 TREE REMOVAL PERIMT DRC2015-00310 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 2 f. The project also includes a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00657) to reduce the street side building setbacks by up to 10 percent, a Minor Exception (DRC2016-00658) to increase the maximum per wall height by up to 2 feet and a Tree Removal Permit (DRC2015-00310) to remove 2 trees. 3. - Based . upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The removal of the trees is necessary due to the condition of the trees related to disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services. The Arborist Report prepared for the project by Golden State Land & Tree Assessment (March 18, 2015) reviewed the condition of the two on -site trees, a Western Sycamore and a Washington Palm. The Arborist Report concluded that the palm conflicts with the proposed on -site improvements, and the sycamore shows multiple signs of decay, including an immense hollow cavity at the base of the tree, which greatly weakens the tree's structure. The Arborist Report recommends making a good faith effort to relocate the Washington Palm on -site and to replace the Western Sycamore with a large specimen tree of the same species. b. The removal of the trees is necessary in order to construct improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. The Tree Removal Permit is related to the development of an 8-unit multi -family housing development. Removal of the Sycamore is necessary due to the condition of the tree. The palm tree conflicts with the installation of the required street improvements. The Arborist Report recommends making a good faith effort to relocate the Washington Palm on -site and to replace the Western Sycamore with a large specimen tree of the same species. C. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood, the established character of the area or property values. There are a large number of mature trees in the surrounding area. The removal of the onsite trees will have a minimal impact on the surrounding area as the 2 trees slated for removal will be mitigated by the planting of 64 trees as part of the related 8-unit, multi -family housing development. d. The removal of the trees is necessary to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood .control or utility right-of-way. The Sycamore is recommended for removal due to multiple signs of decay. The palm tree conflicts with the required street improvements. e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or relocation. The Sycamore tree has been determined by the Arborist Report to show multiple signs of decay and is recommended for removal. The Arborist Report recommends making a good faith effort to relocate the Washington Palm on -site and to replace the Western Sycamore with a large specimen tree of the same species. f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the City. Only one of the two trees, the Western Sycamore, meets the criteria to be classified as a heritage tree. The Sycamore has been determined by the Arborist Report to show multiple signs of decay and is recommended for removal. D2—Pg222 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 TREE REMOVAL PERIMT DRC2015-00310 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 3 g. Removal of the trees in not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan, condition of approval, or designation as a Historic Landmark. The removal of the 2 on -site trees is not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan, condition of approval, or designation as a Historic Landmark., h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the trees. The Arborist Report recommends making a good faith effort to relocate the Washington palm on -site and to replace the Western Sycamore with a large specimen tree of the same species. i. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the surrounding area. The project site is in an area with a large number of mature trees. The impact on the surrounding trees will be mitigated, by the large number of replacement trees to be planted on the site related to the the proposed 8-unit, multi -family development. The Arborist Report recommends making a good faith effort to relocate the Washington palm on -site and to replace the Western Sycamore with a large specimen tree of the same species. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning, Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's recommendation is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. D2—Pg223 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 TREE REMOVAL PERIMT DRC2015-00310 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 4 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is the removal of the two on -site trees, a Western Sycamore and a Washington Palm, related to construction of an 8-unit, multi -family development on 1.01 acres of land located at the southwest corner of 6th Street and Hellman Avenue; APN: 0210-341-74. 2) The approval is subject to Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19918 and Development Review 2014-00732. 3) Replace the Western Sycamore with the largest available nursery grown specimen available (typically 24" box). 4) A good faith effort shall be made to relocate the Washington Palm on -site. If determined to be unfeasible, replace with a 15-gallon size tree. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA go ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: D2—Pg224 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 TREE REMOVAL PERIMT DRC2015-00310 — RC1 HOMES, LLC February 8, 2017 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D2—Pg225 Conditions of Approval RANCHO Community Development Department CUCAMONGA Project#: SUBTT19918, DRC2014-00732, DRC2016-00657, DRC2016-00658, DRC2015-00310 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exceptions, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 2. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 3. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 4. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 5. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 6. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. Printed. 113/2017 w .CityofRC.us D2—Pg226 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,266,25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 10. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 11. All .parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 12. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Hellman Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to west right-of-way. b. Remove and replace curb, gutter, streetlights, catch basin, lateral and sidewalk as required. c. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. 2. Reconstruct access ramp at the southwest- corner of Hellman Avenue and 6th Street to comply with current ADA requirements. The City's Standard Drawing 102 access ramp, does not comply with current ADA requirements. The City is in the process of updating our standards 'however no time frame yet exactly when this will be done. Thereforea detail will have to be added to the street improvement plan showing the design details, elevations, and grades of the access ramp to substantiate they comply with ADA requirements. w .CityofRC.us Printed: 1/3/2017 Page 2 of 12 D2—Pg227 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineerin-g Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. 6th Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City `Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Dedicate right-of-way to total of 44 feet from centerline of street to south right-of-way. b. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, access ramp and street trees as required. c. Install one (1) 9500 Lumen, HPSV-equivalent LED streetlight. The street light shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. d. Provide traffic signing and striping as required. e. Access to/from 6th Street shall be for emergency vehicle access only. The Emergency Access shall be 26 feet wide and shall be constructed as a limited access curb per City Std. 105-C. The material to be installed within the City right-of-way shall be reviewed and approved by The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. No accent paving allowed within the City right-of-way. f. Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be from the centerline of the street. 4. Transition to existing curb and gutter on the west project boundary on 6th Street shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications) on the project side of 6th Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole off -site west of the west project boundary to the first pole west of Hellman Avenue, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. All services crossing 6th Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. In addition, an in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the utilities on the opposite side of 6th Street shall be paid to the City prior to map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. The fee shall be one-half the difference between the undergrounding cost of the utilities' (electrical) on the opposite side of the street minus those (telecommunications) on the project side times the length from the center of Hellman Avenue to the west project boundary. a. The existing power pole on the west side of Hellman Avenue shall be removed and existing utility service lines have to be undergrounded. 6. Provide a transition design from the southerly drive approach on Hellman Avenue. The limits of removal and a.c. pavement replacement shall be determined during plan check south of said drive approach. Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 12 D2—Pg228 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /U SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days 'following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 11. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 12. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. Panted: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 0(12 D2—Pg229 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a' maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 14. A permit from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is required for work within its right-of-way. 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel . or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 12 D2—Pg230 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Hellman Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 18.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. 6th Street Magnolia grandiflora'St Mary' No Common Name Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Size - 15 gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 19. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on 6th Street 44 total feet on Hellman Avenue 20. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 21. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed: 1/3/2017 www.CltyofRC.us , Page 6012 D2—Pg231 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Engineerinq Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval' 22. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 Yz' x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 2. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply 'with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on -site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on -site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on -site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 4. Fire lanes must be constructed as approved and per the RCFPD Standards, a private fire service may be required for on site fire hydrants. all the homes and garages must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The home must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D. 2. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 3. Fire resistive construction of the multi -family dwellings shall be in accordance with the CBC. 4. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property .line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. Printed: 1/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 7 of 12 D2—Pg232 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 6. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 7. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 8. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 9. Construction activity shall only occur in accordance with the times noted in Chapter 17.66 050 D-4 of the Development Code. 10. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development ,Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 11. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 12. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Division's public counter). 13. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 14. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., TT, CUP, DR, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 15. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 16. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Printed: 1/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page ti of 12 D2—Pg233 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: Project Type: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW (S). Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 2. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 3. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 4. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 5. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 6. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 7. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 8. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". �.cityofRC.us Page 9 of 12 Printed: 1/3/2017 D2-Pg234 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of 'Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 12. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 13. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 14. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 15. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 16. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. . 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. Panted: 1/3/2017 w .CllyofRC.us Page 10 of 12 D2—Pg235 Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo /// SWC 6th and Hellman Location: Project Type: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 19. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 20.If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 21. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 22.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 23.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 24. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 25. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 26. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 27. Private streets and driveaisles for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline profiles. 28. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 29. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed; 1/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 12 D2—Pg236' Project #: DRC2014-00732 CEQA2014-00015 Project Name: 8-Unit Condo N SWC 6th and Hellman Location: Project Type: 9287 6TH ST - 021034174-0000 Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 33. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 34. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow, the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 35. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". www.CityofRC.us � Page 12 of 12 Printed: 1/3/2017 D2—Pg237