Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017-10-11 - Agenda Packet - PC-HPC
OCTOBER 11, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca Vice Chairman Macias Commissioner Fletcher Commissioner Munoz Commissioner Wimberly B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1 Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of September 13, 2017 C2. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of September 27, 2017 Page 1 of 5 OCTOBER 11, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00652 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tract Map (SUBTT18928) for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acres in the Medium (M) Residential District, on the west side of Carnelian Street, approximately 180 feet south of Calle Del Prado, located at 7490 Carnelian Street; APN: 0207-022-11. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines as a Class 32 Exemption (CEQA Section 15332) for In -fill Development Projects D2. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2017-00391 - FENG XIAO ARCHITECT, INC - A proposed design modification for six (6) previously approved single-family homes in the Low (L) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court; APN: 0201-182-36. The City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. D3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2016-00999 — DUNKIN' DONUTS — The request to develop a drive-thru lane associated with the development of a 6,001-square foot multi -tenant commercial building on a vacant parcel of 0.95-acres in the General Commercial (GC)District, on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, about 500 feet east of Rochester Avenue, located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-023-10. Related Files: Design Review DRC2016- 00998, Minor Exception DRC2017-00424. The City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. Page 2 of 5 OCTOBER 11, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA D4. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00998 - DUNKIN' DONUTS —The request to develop a 6,001- square foot multi -tenant commercial building on a vacant parcel of 0.95-acres in the General Commercial (GC)District, on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, about 500 feet east of Rochester Avenue, located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-023-10. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999, Minor Exception DRC2017-00424. The City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. D5. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00424 - DUNKIN' DONUTS — A request to reduce the required setback from 45 feet to 40.5 feet for a drive-thru lane associated with the development of a 6,001-square foot multi -tenant commercial building on a vacant parcel of 0.95-acres in the General Commercial (GC)District, on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, about 500 feet east of Rochester Avenue, located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-023-10. Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00998, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999. The City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. D6. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 - MANNING HOMES - A request for site plan and architectural review of 16 single-family residences on 6.59 acres of land within the Low (L) District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan on the south side of Carnesi Drive and east of Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0227-061-03 and 62. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2013-00961, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2013-00962, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936, Variance DRC2014-00219 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00113. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 21, 2015, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Page 3 of 5 OCTOBER 11, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: F. ADJOURNMENT The Commission will adjourn to a workshop in the Rains Room to discuss Pre -Application Review DRC2017-00674. I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 5, 2017 seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the Page 4 of 5 OCTOBER 11, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 5 of 5 Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting 1 3ase Line Church oothil Arrow 8th d a 0 October 115 2017 m _.._N 06th� c i6th w t a Y � 4th AD1 D2 D39 49 5 D1: TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00652—ALEX MUSTAPHA D2: DESIGN REVIEW MOD DRC2017-00391—FENG XIAO ARCHITECT, INC. D3, 4, 5: CUP DRC2016-00999; DR DRC2016-00998; ME DRC2017-00424— DUNKIN DONUTS D6: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378—MANNING HOMES Line hurch F thilI h Arro A �r Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chamber 10600 Civic Center Drive SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 P.M. Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca X Vice Chairman Macias A Commissioner Fletcher X Commissioner Munoz _A_ Commissioner Wimberly _X_ Additional Staff Present. Candyce Burnett, City Planner; Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Brian Sandona, Associate Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Tabe van der Zwaag. Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. f`'f C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 8 Cl—Pgl SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2017 Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, carried 3-0-2 (Macias, Munoz absent), to adopt the Regular Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2017 D. DIRECTOR'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. D1 STATUS UPDATE REGARDING PREPARATION OF THE NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION PROJECT - Including General Plan Amendment DRC2015- 00749, Etiwanda North Specific Plan Amendment DRC2015-00750, North Eastern Sphere Annexation Specific Plan DRC2015-00751, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2015- 00752, and related Environmental Impact Report. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner gave the staff report. David Sargent of Sargent Town Planning, gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) Ruta Thomas of Dudek summarized the CEQA process. She said no Initial Study was prepared because this project is very complex and staff believed from the start that the issues should be fully covered in an EIR that would include all the necessary technical and biological studies. She said the draft document should be released in early 2018 and other opportunities to receive public comments will occur as this process is just beginning. Commissioner Wimberly commented that although we had a workshop he questioned the presentation as it indicated to him that we are in full development mode without briefing the Commission. He asked for clarification. Candyce Burnett, City Planner said the joint workshop with the City Council was the first opportunity to give an overview of the intentions/concepts including removing the ENSP Page 2 of 8 C1-Pg2 or-r i nivinr-r% i j, t-v i f HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA from the area and creating a new plan for the annexation area. She said that following the workshop, bio areas were discovered that we needed to accommodate for conservation. She said the Specific Plan is only in the conceptual phase. She said this is an opportunity to provide comments. She said the plan will be a master guiding document for future development. She noted that as new development projects come in to the plan area they will have to provide their own environmental review. She said the Plan document and environmental review will be provided at a later time; the applicant is just showing us some general styles that may be used in the future development. Commissioner Fletcher noted that the conceptual layout has changed a lot since the workshop. He asked about acreage dedicated to commercial uses as they could help the City financially. He said he likes the concept that it would be a little community on its own. He said for him it is a priority that there should be enough commercial uses so they don't have to come down the hill for restaurants and services. He said he likes the orientation of streets with views and he would like to see an opportunity for estate size lots. He said he is generally good with the direction this is going although the expanded conservation area has taken away some opportunities. He expressed some frustration about reestablishing the area with the hope that the SBKR would return. He liked the idea of Mincro-transit and connections to the Metrolink station on Milliken. He asked for clarification regarding water flow and the idea of cutting some levees. He said he would like lots of workshops on this proposal. Mr. Sargent said about 30 acres is envisioned for commercial uses and their strategy is to allow that to become bigger to allow them room to be successful. He said an additional small mixed use center `College Center" to the southwest of the main central area will be within biking distance of the college and some small or Micro -transit options could help make connections. With respect to water flows he said the levee for Day Creek is a big barrier for fire and water but some levee portions can be cut to allow some water flow to assist in reestablishing the conservation area to what it once was. He said County zoning allows housing in the upper section of the Plan area but by annexing, that will be removed from residential offering greater ability for the City to control future development. It will keep homes out of the high fire zone, help bio habitats, and prevent spotty, un-regulated development that could drain City resources. He said they are working on the documents and value the Commissioners input early -on while changes can still be made. Page 3 of 8 C1-Pg3 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Commissioner Oaxaca said he likes the direction so far and is optimistic. He said he favors taking advantage of incorporating standards that we could not do in other parts of the City and he said they should take advantage of the views. He expressed a little concern about the distance between the town center and mixed use development. He said this will make the Micro -transit option more important. He noted the higher fire risk further north in the City. He said he did not want to create a path for fire danger. He said the levee helps raise the level of fire protection. He said he is glad to see a pattern of density that accommodates the different types of residential development. He said he wants to see much more of the proposed plans. Mr. Sargent noted that our Fire Department keeps them thinking much about wildfire. He said "the Edge" includes fuel modification zones and will help serve as a good fire protection edge and confirmed the levees are also good barriers. He said they are preparing development standards now and there could be large -lot view homes -possibly 1-acre sites. Ms. Burnett said she appreciates the Commissioners' comments and staff will find more opportunities for them to review during the process. The Secretary received and filed the report. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. El. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2017-00619 — DR HORTON — A request for a Development Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and DR Horton for the purpose of providing vested development rights and establishing permit thresholds and development timelines related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant buildings totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road — APN: 1090-331-05. The City Council adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Page 4 of 8 Cl—Pg4 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA environmental impacts for this project on July 19, 2017. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review of a previously adopted Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final review and action. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 23, 2017. Donald Granger, Senior Planner gave the report and recommended the item to be continued to an unspecified date as there still is not a complete agreement to bring forward. He noted the applicant was not present to comment. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, carried 3-0-2 (Macias, Munoz absent) to continue the item to an unspecified date. E2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19836 - YOUSEF AUDI - A request to subdivide a 0.92-acre site into 2 parcels of land in the Low (L) District at the southeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court - APN: 0201-182-07. Staff has determined the project to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15315, Minor Land Divisions. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. The applicant made no comment. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Wimberly, carried 3-0-2 (Macias, Munoz absent) to adopt the Resolution approving SUBTPM19836. E3. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19796 — HARPREET VERMA - A request to subdivide 2.63 acres of land into 2 parcels in the Estate Residential (ER) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District located at the northwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Amber Lane at 5992 Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0225-111-36. Staff has determined the project to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15315, Minor Land Divisions. Page 5 of 8 C1—Pg5 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. The applicant made no comment. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher, carried 3-0-2 (Macias, Munoz absent) to adopt the Resolution approving SURTPM19796 F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: None COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS Commissioner Fletcher asked about the progress and anticipated completion of development occurring on the Northwest corner of Archibald Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. Candyce Burnett, City Planner said they are meeting City timeline thresholds albeit slow, the delay may have been due to a change in ownership and/or construction teams. G. ADJOURNMENT 8:12 PM I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 7, 2017 seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Page 6 of 8 C1-Pg6 %7 —r I CIV11 m 1 J� LU it HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office Page 7 of 8 C1—Pg7 SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. C1—Pg8 SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER 7:00 PM Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Oaxaca A Vice Chairman Macias _X_ Commissioner Fletcher _X_ Commissioner Munoz _X_ Commissioner Wimberly _A_ B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. Page 1 of 10 C2—Pg 1 SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of September 13, 2017 The adoption of the minutes was continued to the next meeting. D. DIRECTOR'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chairman may open the meeting for public input. D1. SELECTION OF COMMISSION REPRESENTATIVE TO SERVE ON THE PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE Moved by Munoz seconded by Fletcher, carried 3-0-2 (Oaxaca, Wimberly absent) to select Commissioner Macias to serve on the Public Art Committee (2-year term). E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. Ell. PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00749, NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2015-00751, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015- 00752, AND ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00750 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - An opportunity for the public to give testimony pertaining to the environmental issues to be addressed in the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for approximately 4,115 acres to be annexed into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which proposes to maintain the northerly 2,915 acres as a "conservation priority area' with limited development and transfer of development rights, and to allow development in the southerly 1,200 acre "development priority area" with land uses to include conservation, residential, commercial, and civic for a project area extending from Haven Avenue, easterly to the City's boundary with Fontana, and from the northerly City limits to the San Bernardino National Forest boundary in the City's Sphere -of -Influence -APNs: 0201-033-32, -35 through -40, -43, and -44, 0201-191-27 and -28, 0201-272-14 through -18, 0201-281-02, -04 through -10, -13, Page 2 of 10 C2—Pg 2 SEPTEMBER 27.2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA -14, -16 through -22, 0225-091-03, 05, and -06, 225-092-01, 0225-101-32, 0225-152-06 through -11, and -17, 0225-161-42, 0226-061-03, -07, -16, -20, -26, -27, -28, -33, -47, -56, - 57, -61 through -71, -73 through -78, 0226-082-08, -19, -20, -21, and -30, 1074-351-01, -04, - 05, and -06, 1087-051-02 through -14, -16 through -27, 1087-061-01 through -21, and 1087- 071-01 through -14, and 16 through -21. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner gave the staff report. He announced the NOP will be re- released for another 30 days because the first release was insufficient in project description/content. David Sargent from Sargent Town Planning gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) summarizing the NESAP and plan objectives. Commissioner Fletcher asked what the open area is to the south of the conservation priority area east of the development area. He asked about the estimate of the new population calculation for the new development area. Candyce Burnett, City Planner, said the open area is previously approved maps (Tracy and Richland). They are in the Very Low and Very Low and Low Residential Districts. She explained that for the purposes of preparing the environmental documents, the consultants will use the dwelling unit density combined with the Department of Finance numbers that are based upon the average number of persons per household. She said we will use the worse - case scenario to project traffic impacts etc. She said the consultants do not have those numbers now but they will be working on it. Commissioner Fletcher asked if there is public access to the conservation area. Ms Burnett said there is some public access, and some access points are private Vice Chairman Macias asked about the review of future development following the EIR process. Ms. Burnett said it is a Program EIR and so the development would have to tier off this EIR or some other supplemental environmental review must be done for future development applications. Page 3 of 10 C2-Pg 3 SEPTEMBER 27.2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Vice Chairman Macias confirmed that layout and project specifics will come later and that this EIR is for drafting the Specific Plan. Ruta Thomas of Dudek (environmental consultant) gave a presentation (copy on file) about the timeline and formation of the environmental docs and process. She said the study will analyze potential impacts of potential population increases. There will be additional time to comment as the NOP will circulate for an additional 30 days. She noted that all comments are considered and responded to. Vice Chairman Macias opened the public hearing for Public Scoping comments. Sam Martinez, Assistant Executive Officer from LAFCO, stated they appreciate the recirculation of the NOP and that they will provide comments. Commissioner Fletcher expressed surprise that there were no members of the public to comment. He asked about the noticing methods used. He said the list of topics appears comprehensive. He said he would like a virtual presentation of what the community may look like once developed. He said because of the location it should be high end - not apartment complexes; perhaps attached residential units. He said a school site set aside is good idea if the population is large enough, there might be room for a high school. He said this might eliminate some school traffic experienced in the residential areas below. Commissioner Munoz asked staff to talk about the noticing of the meeting. Mr. Grahn said he shares the concern and community involvement is crucial. He said the Scoping notices were sent to agencies responsible for input regarding the formulation of the EIR as well as a large legal notice in the newspaper. He said there will be other opportunities for the community to comment at outreach meetings. Commissioner Fletcher reflected on past Scoping meetings wherein the public and environmentalists came to speak. He said there are established neighborhoods near the project area and it affects the entire City -perhaps a reporting to the newspaper or using the "Next Door" application would be helpful. Ms. Burnett said we placed a large advertisement in the Daily Bulletin. She said staff intends to make it more personal with a reach out to schools, HOAs & other agencies. She said we did the required noticing, but we will need to be more site specific at smaller meetings. Page 4 of 10 C2-Pg 4 SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Francie Palmer, Communications Manager, said we will use social media and reach out to the community with a FAQ on the website. She said we will do invitational outreaches to stakeholder groups and at school board meeting, CVWD, and HOA's and some online engagement. She said a mailing is planned for the FAQ. She noted that the City can't see comments on Next Door, we need folks to report to us if there are comments. She noted the City will be filming tomorrow a segment about Healthy RC with an emphasis on the conservation area. Commissioner Munoz appreciated the information and said he is glad about upcoming notifications. No members of the public spoke. The Secretary noted the Commissioner's comments and will forward the comments received to the environmental consultants in preparation of the environmental documents and studies. E2. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2017-00725 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend Titles 8 and 17 of the Municipal Code to amend regulations regarding cannabis activity within the City. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA sections 15061(B)(3) and 15305. This item will be forwarded to City Council for final action. Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) Commissioner Fletcher asked if they can deliver by mail and if minors can be prescribed medical marijuana. Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney said the City and State cannot regulate the mail. He said the City can regulate the commercial and non-commercial delivery. He said he will check to see if minors can get a prescription for medical marijuana. Vice Chairman Macias asked if this measure is passed can they apply for a building structure in which to grow the plants. Page 5 of 10 C2—Pg 5 SEPTEMBER 27.2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Ms. Nakamura said they would still have to follow all land use limits for lot coverage, etc, and the building structure would have to go through the regular building permitting and inspection process. Mr. Ghirelli noted that the building official does not ask the purpose of a building. If its permitted, they can receive a permit to build it. Ms. Nakamura said the chart (see attachment to staff report) is needed because permits may be needed for example, an electric panel to handle the load of the grow lights. Vice Chairman Macias expressed concern that we may be encouraging illegal growing operations. Commissioner Munoz noted that 6 plants are allowed per residence. He asked hypothetically if one can grow more than that if he is growing for his neighbors. Ms. Nakamura said this is per residence and not per resident irrespective of the number of occupants in the house, only 6 plants are allowed per house (or dwelling unit). Vice Chairman Macias opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Moved by Macias, seconded by Munoz, carried 3-0-2 (Oaxaca, Wimberly absent) to recommend approval of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2017-00725 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. E3. MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2017-00726 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -A request to amend Title 17 (Development Code) of the Municipal Code to modify parkway landscaping requirements, adopt revised State water efficient landscape standards, and amend the conditionally permitted zones for indoor entertainment and recreation uses. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Section 15061(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. Jennifer Nakamura, Associate Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). She said the water MWELO will primarily affect new development. Page 6 of 10 C2—Pg 6 SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Vice Chairman Macias opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 3-0-2 (Oaxaca, Wimberly absent) to recommend approval of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2017-00726 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. E4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00695 - RANCHO CUCAMONGA PROPERTIES, LLC - A request for site plan and architectural review of two industrial buildings totaling 150,003 square feet on two separate parcels totaling 7.52 acres of land, located north of 8th Street and west of Industrial Lane in the General Industrial (GI) District - APNs: 0209-032-28 & 0209-032-29. Staff has a prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Dat Tran, Assistant Planner, gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted correction pages before the Commissioners: conditions 9-11 are being removed and condition #12 was modified to reflect the corrected dollar amount to file the NOD with the County. He noted the letters submitted by David Moore of Moore Electric. Mr. Tran said Mr. Moore's concerns were addressed by staff in person and summarized in the staff report. Commissioner Fletcher asked for clarification regarding traffic and Engineering's statement about the road being designed to handle that traffic. He asked if the intersection is designed to handle the large trucks. He asked if there are plans to improve 9th Street. Albert Espinoza, Assistant City Engineer said Archibald and Vineyard are classified to handle truck traffic. He said staff researched the accident history since 2012 and noted 1 accident in 2013; in 2014 a vehicle hit a truck; there were no accidents in 2015 or 2016; in 2017 1 truck and a vehicle were involved and then 1 accident occurred where a truck took out a fire hydrant. He said there are 25, 000 daily trips and only 4 accidents in a 5.5-year period. He said truckers have skills and capabilities to get through tight intersections. There is a non -developed parcel at the southwest comer of the intersection. He said we may have potential to improve the intersection to assist truckers. He said all streets in that area are classified as industrial collectors. He said he would check with the Capital Improvement section to see about possible improvements to 9th Street. Bill Fox, the applicant, said he has built 13 or 14 buildings in Rancho. He said he appreciated Mr. Tran's assistance in the process. He said the added environmental reports and delays Page 7 of 10 C2-Pg 7 SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA cost about $20, 000 and time. He said staff was very cooperative and helpful in understanding the process. Vice Chairman Macias opened the public hearing but seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Commissioner Munoz commented that it is a good design and he thanked the applicant for continuing in the process with the challenges. Commissioner Fletcher said it is a nice design and fits the area. He said he would like to discuss in the future: articulation in the roof plane as well as in the wall planes. He said he would like to see cornices on the roof parapet. Moved by Munoz seconded by Fletcher carried 3-0-2 (Oaxaca, Wimberly absent) to adopt the resolution with the modified conditions approving Design Review DRC2016-00695 and the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER -AGENCY UPDATES: N COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: Commissioners Fletcher and Munoz thanked the City, City Council and staff for putting on an enjoyable evening, Monday, September 25, recognizing the service of the various City Boards and Commissions G. ADJOURNMENT 8:50 PM I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 21, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Page 8 of 10 C2-Pg 8 SEPTEMBER 27.2017 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Lois J. Schrader Planning Commission Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. Page 9 of 10 C2—Pg 9 7 JCr 1 CIVIoGPC 41 7 LU I / HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,725 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 10 of 10 C2—Pg 10 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 11, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00652 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tract Map (SUBTT18928) for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acres in the Medium (M) Residential District, on the west side of Carnelian Street, approximately 180 feet south of Calle Del Prado, located at 7490 Carnelian Street; APN: 0207-022-11. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines as a Class 32 Exemption (CEQA Section 15332) for In -fill Development Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a one (1) year Time Extension DRC2017-00652 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BACKGROUND: On October 8, 2014, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acres; SUBTT18928 received a 3-year approval that is set to expire on October 8, 2017. Related applications include Design Review DRC2013-00824 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825; both applications received a 5-year approval that is set to expire on October 8, 2019. Prior to Planning Commission approval, the Grading, Technical, and Design Review Committees reviewed and recommended approval of the project on June 17, 2014. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The project site is a 1.02-acre site located on the west side of Carnelian Street, south of Base Line Road. There is an existing single-family residence that is proposed for demolition as part of the original project. The site is otherwise undeveloped and dominated by a variety of low vegetation and mature trees. The property is approximately 100 feet wide, and extends approximately 441 feet west along the northern side and 431 feet west along the southern side (to the flood control easement). The site is surrounded to the north, south, east and west by existing residential and utility land uses, as indicated in the following table. D1—Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00028 — ANDREASEN ENGINNERING, INC. February 22, 2017 Page 3 Land Use General Plan "' _-2onin Site Single -Family Residence Medium Residential Medium (M) Residential District North Single -Family Residence and Medium Residential Medium (M) Residential Townhomes District South Single -Family Residence and Medium Residential Medium (M) Residential Water Tank District East Single -Family Residences Low Residential Low L Residential District West Flood Control Channel Flood Control / Utility Flood Control (FC) District Corridor ANALYSIS: A. General: The original approval of SUBTT18928 was on October 8, 2014 for a time period of 3 years and is set to expire on October 8, 2017. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regulates the subdivision of land through Title 16, the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Section 16.16 is applicable specifically to Tentative Maps — 5 or More Parcels -- and provides for time extension requests through Section 16.16.170 Extensions. Section 16.16.170.A. states, "The subdivider or his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by written application to the community development department. The application shall be filed not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for requesting the extension." The time extension application to extend SUBTT18928 was submitted on August 9, 2017. This application is a request to extend the approval period of the subject tentative tract map for 1 year. The applicant has submitted a letter stating the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit B). B. Conformance with the Development Code: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 is a valid subdivision, and no changes have occurred to the project site since the map was previously approved and there are no changed circumstances related to its subdivision. Therefore, a 1-year time extension of map can be approved. Per the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the Planning Commission can grant time extensions in 12-month increments for up to an additional 5 years (beyond the original 3-year approval period) for a maximum of 8 years from the original time approval, which could ultimately extend the map until October 8, 2022. This application is the first 1-year time extension request which, if approved, would set the expiration date to October 8, 2018 as shown below. Approving ". ;Approval/Extension ` Approval' Approval`;Date ; Expir`ation Authori T e Period ;Date Planning Commission Initial Approval PC Reso. 14-46 3 Years October 8, 2014 October 8, 2017 Planning Time Extension Commission DRC2017-00652 1 Year October 11, 2017 October 8, 2018 C. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan D1—Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00028—ANDREASEN ENGINNERING, INC. February 22, 2017 Page 3 designation and regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the application, the time extension request is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code which will facilitate the development of the subject property with residential uses consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Map. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. CB:TG/Is EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Vicinity Map Exhibit B - Applicant Letter Requesting Extension Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 8, 2014 Exhibit D - Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-46 for SUBTT18928 Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2017-00652 D1—Pg3 RESOLUTION NO. 17-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A 1-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR DRC2017-00652 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 18928 FOR AN 8-UNIT TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT ON 1.02 ACRES IN THE MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET, APPROXIMATELY 180 FEET SOUTH OF CALLE DEL PRADO, LOCATED AT 7490 CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-022-11 A. Recitals 1. Alex Mustapha filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map 18928, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of October, 2014, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 14-46, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On 11th day of October, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on October 11, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 1.02-acre parcel located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11; and b. The abutting properties to the north of the subject site contain single-family residential and townhomes which are located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the east, across Carnelian Street, consist of single-family residential that are located within the Low (L) Residential District; the properties to the south, consist of single-family residential and a water tank located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the west, contains a flood channel located within the Flood Control (FC) District; and C. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and D1—Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-86 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00652 —ALEX MUSTAPHA October 11, 2017 Page 2 d. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 for one (1) additional year. The expiration date with approval of the subject time extension will be October 8, 2018. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, Ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is to subdivide the property for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acres is consistent with the Development Code; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The surrounding parcels to the north, south, and east are developed with single- family residential units and townhome units, the parcel to the west is a flood control channel; and C. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide an existing parcel of land for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acres is consistent with the development and density of the surrounding parcels of land; and d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City; and e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 is October 11, 2018. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-46 for SUBTT18928 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2017-00652. 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. D1—Pg5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-86 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00652 — ALEX MUSTAPHA October 11, 2017 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of October, 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D1—Pg6 Vicinity Map Time Extension DRC2017=00652 ------ : - e Project Site OL OL > i : i % 19th St' t y i Base Line INN—— Base Line J t f , Church Church Foothill 7 Foothill N t Arrow E ° Arrow Jersey t 3 9th ..— -- w _. i o a n C7 6th�� � � ,� �6th w r } s Q 2 S g * City Hall EXHIBIT A D1—Pg7 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department RE: 7490 Carnelian St Tentative Tract Map 18928 Time Extension The final map has been reviewed by the engineering department and city surveyor. We are in the process of getting approval from Cucamonga Valley Water District. We need the time extension so that the final map can be recorded. Thank You, N U' -k-- Alex Mustapha Y2N-1, LLC EXHIBIT B D1—Pg8 STAFF REPORT PUNNING DEPARTMENT DATE: October 8, 2014 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - A request to create a Tract Map for an 8-unit townhouse development for a 1.02-acre site within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related cases: Design Review DRC2013-00824 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - Design review for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acre within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related cases: SUBTT18928 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00825 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - A request to remove 9 trees related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 and Design Review DRC2013-00824 for a 1.02-acre site within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928, Design Review DRC2013-00824, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of approval with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residential and Townhomes — Medium (M) Residential District South - Single -Family Residential and Water Tank — Medium (M) Residential District East - Single -Family Residential — Low (L) Residential District West - Flood Channel — Flood Control (FC) District B. General Plan Designations Site - Medium Residential (MR) North - Medium Residential (MR) South - Medium Residential (MR) East - Low Residential (LR) West - Flood Control (FC) / Utility Corridor (UC) EXHIBIT C D1—Pg9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18928, DRC2013-00824, AND DRC2013-00825 - ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The project location is a 1.02-acre site zoned Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac), located on the west side of Carnelian Street, south of Base Line Road. There is an existing single-family residence that is proposed for demolition as part of this project. The property is about 100 feet in width, and the lot extends approximately 441 feet west along the northern side and 431 feet west along the southern side (to the flood control easement). There is a regional trail along the flood control easement; single-family residential and a water tank owned by San Bernardino County Flood Control to the south; and both single-family and multi -family residential to the north. ANALYSIS A. Tentative Tract Map: The applicant proposes to subdivide the 1.02-acre parcel into eight (8) individual lots for the purposes of constructing an 8-unit townhouse development. Each lot is approximately 2,613 square feet. The driveway/fire lane area totals 13,368 square feet, and the open space area totals 7,631 square feet. B. Design Review: In conjunction with the tract map, the applicant is proposing to construct an 8-unit townhouse development along the south side of the property. The product proposes three bedrooms, a second floor, and a garage for each unit. The eight (8) townhouse units total to about 14,544 square feet, and lot coverage is approximately 20 percent. There is an open private/common space proposed, which includes an open lawn area, tot lot play area, and a barbecue/picnic area. Each unit will have a private landscaped front lawn area (298 square feet), with the exception of Unit 8 (198 square feet). This reduced landscaped area was to accommodate the pedestrian walkway that fronts all of the units. C. Tree Removal Permit: There are 41 trees existing on -site, and 11 trees are considered to be Heritage Trees. Of the 11 heritage trees, 9 are proposed for removal. The applicant is requesting to remove 34 trees total as part of the project. The arborist report submitted recommended that trees that are remaining should be protected with an orange temporary construction fence during construction. Removed trees shall be replaced by at least a 1 to 1 ratio; with tree species appropriate to the new site requirements. The landscape plans show a total of 56 trees that will be planted on -site. Six, 36-inch box trees, five, 24-inch box trees, and thirty seven 15 gallon size trees. D. Parkinq Calculations: Per Section 17.64.050, three bedroom townhomes shall provide 2 parking spaces per unit. Each unit has a 2-car garage. Visitor parking shall be provided at a rate of 1 per 3 units, which equals 3 parking spaces. These 3 spaces are provided at the west side of the project where the water line easement is located. Additionally, the garage was set back for each unit (with the exception of Unit 8), to allow the option for parking on the driveway. E. Cultural Resources Assessment: The applicant provided a cultural resources assessment for any potential historical impacts associated with the demolition of the existing residence on -site. The residence was built in 1961 in the California Ranch style. According to the study, the property did not fit the criteria for significance or eligibility as presented in the National Historic Preservation Act and/or California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); therefore, the proposed redevelopment of the property will not result in any adverse impacts. D1—Pg10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18928, DRC2013-00824, AND DRC2013-00825 - ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 3 Acoustical Analysis: The applicant included noise conditions and construction methods to reduce any noise issues related to project. The Acoustical Analysis was provided because the General Plan identifies Carnelian Street with a noise level that ranges from 60 to 70 dBA CNEL. A noise study is required for all residential development located within the noise contours where noise levels exceed 60 dBA as identified in the General Plan, Figure PS-9 and PS-10. As part of project, these specific noise reduction methods were built into the project such as installing STC glazing to all windows and doors for Units 1 and 2. The proposed cement mortar unit block over stucco perimeter wall should provide adequate noise control barriers for the private yards for Units 1 and 2 as noted in the study. Specific wall construction methods will be incorporated into the building construction plans to reduce unit -to -unit noise. G. Trail Head: The General Plan indicates a proposed Trail Head (Figure CS-3) just west of the project site. There is a steep slope, approximately 20 feet in grade difference that exists towards the west side of the site, adjacent to the regional trail. Because of the size of the project and the existing topography, staff has determined that access to the trail was not feasible. H. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at the Best Western Heritage Inn on 8179 Spruce Street, Rancho Cucamonga, on December 12, 2013. No one from the public attended the meeting. I. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by the Committees on June 17, 2014. The Committees recommended approval of the project without changes. J. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca and Granger) twice; once on June 17, 2014 and on September 2, 2014. At the first meeting, the Committee did not recommend approval of the project and asked that the applicant work with staff on the design. The overall comments provided by the Committee were that the units are identical and needed some variation. The windows and doors were all similar and "cookie cutter." It was recognized that the site is constrained by its small size and would be difficult to adjust footprints so the applicant would need to be creative. Suggestions from the Committee included: Utilize arched or recessed windows and doors, alternate the scalloped edges, include corbels, create variations in the roof line, use more iron work, recess the wall planes, and create borders around the windows. Since the meeting, staff met with the applicant to work on the design. Before the second Design Review Committee meeting, the applicant revised the design twice with staff to meet the design goals expected. They have creatively used the arched windows in various locations, added more ironwork to the second floor, included wooden doors and wooden sectional garage doors, included shutters, corbels, and the scalloped edging was utilized only on certain units to create variation. Some roof planes have been changed so that they are not identical, and windows have been updated to include mullions and bordered by lintels. On September 2, 2014, the Committee requested that these enhancements be carried out towards the south elevation as well, to achieve the design goal of "360 degree architecture." With this revision, the Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. K. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) because the project D1—Pg11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18928, DRC2013-00824, AND DRC2013-00825 - ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 4 includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, ti Candyce fznett Planning Director CB:MN/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Neighborhood Meeting Sign -In Sheets (December 12, 2013) Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Action Agendas dated June 17, 2014 and September 2, 2014 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2013-00824 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825 D1—Pg12 F7. � E S 3S SF a Al A I E5 6 I I I I Iz T y--- •� X \ oml I I I ��I IJA � � ai zg � I i i i c U ,C /°/P/,A/y EXHIBIT A Dl-Pg13 a __maw _mom _»n - § ( � � __I _�� 2 A §§ m _dn_— _II_ & _oa_ %» ;55 (� )ƒ( mmwK re\ � c-- -- [\ � , I '� � •!! 2d , iZ<� r � \ � � ® me: o-@R \ __mom _mono_ __ __IIvo . _dA-Ii_-u-i _gin& _o ,! m 2—@S §( __ § �. §§ $ _dam _— _ mn¥a: ) § I^o - | ! I.::.•:1::. ]/SomR PIA m-he a,x..., �ua�a�.�Kixniv 4 ' C I a. r,. ra- per' � I l$ 0 viNmom-m `voNowvon3 OHONvm .,,. v 133MIS NVIl3N8tl9 064EZZ 193rOHd Allwtld•I1-inw 11Nn (B) 03SOdOLd Q rn IW �l j i I oz 0 �O �w LL w I � z y � s 6 9QS yy N q3 MM 2 ZQ8�4�����du�C.0 f Tw ZZ�d'W 3�tl.. w h N Z g a R O r 0 0, F LLz ❑ m ZK 00 w� �z z DI-Pgl7 ■ | |\j __m3'VDmn3n3 _and= bRLDRrOHd A'11_-I.L'lmmn¥_m_<7 a !! �§\\� g =)W§r• � j\), .,...:.., `0 ){ $ ■ oco.�aemw '" �- : ^% VINBodlltlo `tloNOWVOnO OHDNtlN �� 3" 133L1S NVII3Ntltlo 064L 1 1o3rOHd AIIWVd-I1lnW 11Nn (S) a3soaoaa Q °J rn 9)i ryj L — 7 I L — I O ; a z w C7 = Y 0O Oo r i • I I I - I L — I ME D1—Pg19 3 n� VINNOj1'IVO'VONOWVO(tO OHONVN 1337l1S NVIl3Nf1VO O6bL~ nv vcav ezm � uweia�en "awu. pi9R�a 1J3rou II AWtldI1 -lOW LINO (B) O3SOdOHd Q vaarn am°nne -Gj BSi�s� m H 0 O Z 0 z Y OQ Ow z❑ 00 2 a� w� JZ wZ 0 N w 3 c� Z „ 0, 0w 0 o� > s WZ w� I Y D1-Pg20 �la<lo wl W00<'ltlJ'[3T3pM Wl �n l-- _ 1 ICI -.-, M_-1 0 O Z Z o m Z- J Ow 00 JO O f � N J W Z Z 2 7 H 0 0 rn VINmod1-Itlo lvf)NOwvono ON'. 133N1S NVIl3NNtl3 i A91WVd•I1'InW 11Nn (8) a3so D1-Pg21 °,°,-„m�6O� W ^ °• o =; tlIN8Odlltl0 `tlONOWtl9f10 OHONtlt! .... x 3Yiy.`i��� 133N1S NtlIl3N21tl'J O6CL muna..'naa.�min. ie w'i�#• 1O3P08d AIIWtld•I.LIOW ,LINO (0) a3SOdOud Q m .o F ¢N 4 ^ Z U ZJ 00 00 O Zn O u QC' W Z W Z F- W F N W U Z J Y W 00 00 J Z O ,d aS Q # H W Z W D F- n D1-Pg22 I p^ VINHoa itl0'tl°JNOWVO00 OHON7 �R °aaoa-mnvaio'v sm �C r ;_ ° �" 133N1S NtlI13N8tl7 06VL � 1O3fO8d Aiiwv: ILIOW mNn (8) O3SOdO8d vxauu°v xmav°am°nnv y_ CS xx_�'ga Q rn ,0 02 W D1-Pg23 `+ —6 Mc� NVId NOI VE)IRIUI _ensa n 133tl15 NHI'13NtlH� 3NI1 tl31N30 tlIN80dilOo `tlONOWtlOOJ ONDNIM 133N1S NVI13NMVO 06VL io3PONd AIIWtld91lOW 11N0 (8) G3SOd08dI J o D1—Pg24 __mUa_ma,_a� , __ ___ _L _dam _- m _n« \ � «} \}|i jai !.|. !e•eee:+ \ I ■ m-&» $ _--_ " Cii- ' 133�15 NtlIl3NLtlo 0ESlIV13Q 3dVOSONYI Q '^0 oS g rxe'» 133P08d A-ljwvd-I1lOW.LING (8) 03SOdOMd .J c ii eC�'oG a effl rn e e Z W ii3 a_ o Vie€ O 5 U zz ai�4� Z d_�2 > 0 w R a 3 z -� e a lYai9sa �: mo Y5 X i a ks Z 4 6 s' m ea a 9 a F- a aa6 aa° �'C o e'y ge 3_ Ma § z z �c w � I Z 0 3 p a as o OL m 3 � e° > €3e z 1 D1 eee Z, __maw GQ;g & _ __S _L . : * REIMI SNUM3 _d_— n.LiN2*03S_]: � «\� � , r « r 9 a.41�•2 r !/ � .� ( . © •� ` .;, a ui < O Q )U O Q Z U E O D W L W U m J =O Q U =U (n Z Z 0..1.. � O W �/ OZF � ry �o c •^) V U U O 0. V N q _ ___ .. ...___ �� •• _ . ._ .1.._.___...____. aLvo v eu°� � _ O -� N �, j. V /_�-US NV/73NdV�z —_Q _— Q I i .3 cc.sa q�va yN E p. 4y 4 Qa Sa y a Rh„ifs S;v E_�z3sgp Z I lu i rt (7 �'il i ii�.12AeMtfeee=.�e,^:aa� G i § � am! � is ! ([( l [0 �® m ° 4 � e ^ r / ( , E \ � ] \_ ,{ \ ' v // ¥. ( 2§\ �� &} ( � m O z ad' H U E- H � 00 I ups UZ P, o�mW zwoo 0 1 UZI Fa VU � r z P4 x c e A 0 0 i' 0 a s aE �S d43 - A n, M .. Q d3 a C? 2 ° =;R �18; o2 ; s z a W Wtl� ] 9g5 0 as ea i lJ.FF 25� : a ola$8 � as3oS a 3 Hu m,93 �3 -ps �ag3a Ez e3;z?39E.aai%5:�a9'.s�sx: a'a„ca,3ni?:b?m.w33 aw _:s Ii uul. '�ii1111 �� � � iII : ff = s 12 z e na a `'�w g� s""� EsP 'eC nig Y q �p,c �s EvE Ada �5 A mE Y mIF no 9�� p5- e .. �85 YA jM r.�A o �a �'ee = Eqs E2 - _gL¢58G° a� »2- ?E Bono ` 8vr°oyO 3 T'�myxLSEn�cu G�c n 352 Ems$ ;� i`°E _ B�E� 9 =`xb. cESa E $&a m a see .. .. .._ - $E6 5€1- y'E, L my T 3 5`d 'E, ESE tY 5 E3 8 '8 E €G & ER E82 ESa .E S A 2S » G E 3� t EH .EE A E+ � Y�. 5 4 vy Y} G LY i � ®M L Yv g J - cE E _ v ASE� v2 ��o m u 8 �=y e�^i'N.�YoY �N g @.' $ 'a Q.o;e E>$ E C.rEE 3 $q5 _ E H Go gs" 8 Gm E==qa sse>:`^gym? a�A'e <B� aoi+ aaE� a`E Ax° A �° ae � 3evJ5GaV1 {31 „:�I al, ��� • � Rai M1G/ m a- 00 O ca z E+ U P4 F U Op 3 z 3y z <s 6�z W U� De— kmo z oow 0.i clam x m U 'rf 51 t' b ] ZQ a PO m C ng oo a u - e / U U• y ,p b I § 1. e e j999 i S xixau y a g9 6• ` I J¢ a R � z ITik lir- = e Vk U , { i gb aura" D1— N G z W WUG O cTNCO L� Y O�0 N W�Wr 2 Qc 2 W (� U � s � o z � o o z m uzc $ /a W OOW 2m yd H p4.0 OOF 00 h� @ 9 9 a �,o FO � a t7 g z a a d � b V W � N y O P N V W o r 75 a i ui < O Q )U O Q Z U E O D W L W U m J =O Q U =U (n Z Z 0..1.. � O W �/ OZF � ry �o c •^) V U U O 0. V N q _ ___ .. ...___ �� •• _ . ._ .1.._.___...____. aLvo v eu°� � _ O -� N �, j. V /_�-US NV/73NdV�z —_Q _— Q I i .3 cc.sa q�va yN E p. 4y 4 Qa Sa y a Rh„ifs S;v E_�z3sgp Z I lu i rt (7 �'il i ii�.12AeMtfeee=.�e,^:aa� G i § � am! � is ! ([( l [0 �® m ° 4 � e ^ r / ( , E \ � ] \_ ,{ \ ' v // ¥. ( 2§\ �� &} ( � m O z ad' H U E- H � 00 I ups UZ P, o�mW zwoo 0 1 UZI Fa VU � r z P4 x c e A 0 0 i' 0 a s aE �S d43 - A n, M .. Q d3 a C? 2 ° =;R �18; o2 ; s z a W Wtl� ] 9g5 0 as ea i lJ.FF 25� : a ola$8 � as3oS a 3 Hu m,93 �3 -ps �ag3a Ez e3;z?39E.aai%5:�a9'.s�sx: a'a„ca,3ni?:b?m.w33 aw _:s Ii uul. '�ii1111 �� � � iII : ff = s 12 z e na a `'�w g� s""� EsP 'eC nig Y q �p,c �s EvE Ada �5 A mE Y mIF no 9�� p5- e .. �85 YA jM r.�A o �a �'ee = Eqs E2 - _gL¢58G° a� »2- ?E Bono ` 8vr°oyO 3 T'�myxLSEn�cu G�c n 352 Ems$ ;� i`°E _ B�E� 9 =`xb. cESa E $&a m a see .. .. .._ - $E6 5€1- y'E, L my T 3 5`d 'E, ESE tY 5 E3 8 '8 E €G & ER E82 ESa .E S A 2S » G E 3� t EH .EE A E+ � Y�. 5 4 vy Y} G LY i � ®M L Yv g J - cE E _ v ASE� v2 ��o m u 8 �=y e�^i'N.�YoY �N g @.' $ 'a Q.o;e E>$ E C.rEE 3 $q5 _ E H Go gs" 8 Gm E==qa sse>:`^gym? a�A'e <B� aoi+ aaE� a`E Ax° A �° ae � 3evJ5GaV1 {31 „:�I al, ��� • � Rai M1G/ m a- 00 O ca z E+ U P4 F U Op 3 z 3y z <s 6�z W U� De— kmo z oow 0.i clam x m U 'rf 51 t' b ] ZQ a PO m C ng oo a u - e / U U• y ,p b I § 1. e e j999 i S xixau y a g9 6• ` I J¢ a R � z ITik lir- = e Vk U , { i gb aura" D1— N G z W WUG O cTNCO L� Y O�0 N W�Wr 2 Qc 2 W (� U � s � o z � o o z m uzc $ /a W OOW 2m yd H p4.0 OOF 00 h� @ 9 9 a �,o FO � a t7 g z a a d � b V W � N y O P N V W o r 75 a i & �| §!; % ƒ ! k} }� R } l)` |§!\2 \ � § ƒ k§ � � ;zo u gig |/)/� »9 � # ( { ) } ( . \ § | ) { ƒ - !a; 39»J «»S« J J J J J room planning group, Inc. J J J J J J J J J YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING! J N N N I V P V M~~ M /V M M~~ N• I M M /Y N /Y M M~ N A I M M M M • PURPOSE: To let you know about a new residential development being planned in your area & to solicit your comments • YOUR HOST: Mr. Alex Mustapha, Project Applicant • DATEfTIME: DECEMBER 12, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. • PLACE: THE HERITAGE INN 8179 Spruce Street, Rancho Cucamonga In the "HERITAGE ROOM" PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A request to subdivide approximately 1.02 acres of land located a 7490 Carnelian Street to allow the construction of eight (8) two story single family homes at a density of 8 units per acre, as permitted by the current zoning and land use designations. The subject property is currently occupied by one older single family structure, which would be demolished. PROJECT CASE INFORMATION: Environmental Assessment and Design Review DRC2013-00824; Tentative Tract Map #SUBTT18928; Assessor's Parcel Map Number (APN) 0207-022-1 1 PROJECT APPLICANT AND INFORMATION CONTACT. Mr. Alex Mustapha; 536 West Arrow Highway, SUITE 201, Covina, CA. 91722, TEL: 626/859-0222. M M /Y I~ M M M M M M M M /V M AI 00 I r M /V /Y / r/ r ow" M M /V /V M~ M -PROJECT & HOTEL LOCATION MAPS ON REVERSE - EXHIBIT B D1—Pg35 CARNELIAN STREET TOWNHOMES CASE NUMBERS: DRC2013.00824, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT 18928 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING, DEC. 12, 2013 SIGN -IN SHEET NAME (PLEASE PRINT) ADDRESS TELEPHONE 2. Aftle MVLs r.1�h SsC, W. A-rnw fir�i CUvItll� c z�1 / C ` 5 �%—v-z.2Z C�(?�-J.%fit �;'���.r,� Cf� cam= 7 �� �'4'6l/fi'�o -•�7v 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1 O. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15: 16. D1-Pg36 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 17, 2014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California L' CALLTO'ORMR'. Roll Call Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Candyce Burnett _ Alternates: Ray Wimberly Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca X Donald Granger X Frances Howdyshell_ The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928 — ALEX MUSTAPHA - A request to create a Tract Map for an 8-unit townhouse development for a 1.02-acre site within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street-APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00824 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. EXHIBIT C 1 of 2 ACTION 7:00 p.m. A. The project was not approved. Revisions are needed and return to DRC. DI—Pg37 _ DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA June 17, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824 — ALEX MUSTAPHA - Design review for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acre within the Medium Residential District located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related files: SUBTT18928 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. B. The project was not approved. Revisions are needed and return to DRC C. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00825 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - A C. The project was request to remove 26 trees related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 not approved. and Design Review DRC2013-00824 for a 1.02-acre site within the Revisions are needed Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - and return to DRC APN: 0207-022-11. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00305 - BRAD BULLER FOR TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER - A review of a proposed change to the color scheme/theme of an existing commercial complex of about 63.6 acres within the Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista Community Plan, located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue - APNs: 1077-422-10, -11, -17, -60, - 62, -66 through -69, and -79 through -92 II III. PUB C Colvr rrTs II This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2 of 2 D. The project was approved. The applicant will need an inspection on a test area (accent colors) then final approval by Planning Manager and/or DRC on the color before applying to the rest of the building(s). nc.= 8:03 p.m. D1—Pg38 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ZT E AGENDA CRAMoNrA SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Roll Call Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett _ Alternates: Ray Wimberly Lou Munoz Donald Granger X Frances Howdyshell_ II' � • II:. �PRn.TE('T REUiEW'iTF1ViS � � � ' � III The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - A request to create a Tract Map for an 8-unit townhouse development for a 1.02-acre site within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in -fill development consistentwith the applicable General Plan designation and regulations — APN: 020-702-211. Related cases: Design Review DRC2013-00824 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. 1 of 2 ACTION 7:00 p.m. A. Approved. D1—Pg39 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA B. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824-ALEX MUSTAPHA- Design review for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02-acre of land within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations - APN: 020702211. Related cases: Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928. C. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEWDRC2013-00896—ACKAUSHAL-Site plan and architectural review of a 1,659 square foot single-family residence with a 506 square foot garage on a 3,358 square foot lot on the east side of Center Avenue and south of 24th Street within the Low (L) Residential Development District, located at 8855 Center Avenue - APN: 0209-123-05. Related case: Variance DRC2013-00897. D. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18961 -TRACY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE, LLC - A request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low (VL) Residential Zoning District, located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane at 5615 Sapphire Street - APN: 1061-691-04. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption becausd the project includes in -fill development consistentwith the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2of2 B. Approved. C. Applicant not present — the item was moved to the September 30, 2014, DRC meeting. D. Approved. None. 7:29 p.m. D1—Pg40 RESOLUTION NO. 14-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 1.02-ACRE PARCEL FOR AN 8-UNIT TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (M) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 7490 CARNELIAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-022-11. A. Recitals. 1. Alex Mustapha filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of October 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said public hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it. is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on October 8, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 1.02-acre parcel located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11: and b. The abutting properties to the north of the subject site contain single-family residential and townhomes which are located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the east, across Carnelian Street, consist of single-family residential that are located within the Low (L) Residential District; the properties to the south, consist of single-family residential and a water tank located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the west, contains a flood channel located within the Flood Control (FC) District; and C. The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject 1.02-acre parcel into 8 individual lots for the purposes of constructing an 8-unit townhouse development. Each parcel is approximately 2,613 square feet. The driveway/fire lane area totals 13,368 square feet, and the open space area totals 7,631 square feet; and d. The proposed subdivision is being requested in conjunction with the development of eight (8) townhouse units totaling 14,544 square feet. EXHIBIT D D1—Pg41 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-46 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928—ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed tentative parcel map is in conjunction with a proposal to construct eight (8) townhouse units totaling 14,544 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is Medium Residential; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code because the lots being created meet the minimum parcel dimensions and size requirements; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed as the subject property is currently developed with a single-family residence and does not have any geographical constraints. The property generally slopes from north to south and is surrounded by existing residential development to the north, south, and east. To the west is a flood channel; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The design of the site is in compliance with the General Plan and Development Code requirements and is consistent with neighboring existing residential developments; and e. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The studies prepared for this project, which includes, but is not limited to an analysis of air quality,' biological resources, cultural resources, and noise, indicated that the proposed development will not create significant impacts that might cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The project involves the completion of frontage improvements (Carnelian Street) that will be used for vehicular access to the site. These off -site improvements as well as all on -site improvements are consistent with the surrounding development. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution D1—Pg42 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-46 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928—ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: 0_ Candy$e urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October 2014, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE DI—Pg43 Project #: Project Name: Location: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department SUBTTIS928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 8 unit townhouse 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Notice of Exemption - $50 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 18928 is granted subject to the approval of Design Review DRC2013-00824. 6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. , Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Crime Free Multi -Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi -Family Housing Program. Printed: 9/30/2014 v .CityofRC.us DI-Pg44 Project #: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8'unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 8. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 11. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. 12. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 13. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 14. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 15, All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 16. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 17. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Manager, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 18. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 19. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. Pdnted 9100/2014 w .CityofRC.us Page 2 of 16 D1—Pg45 Project #: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 20. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 21. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 22. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 23. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 24. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 25. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 26. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 27. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency, 28. For multiple -family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 29. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 30. For single-family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two 1/2-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 31. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. Pnnled: 9/30/2014 �.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 16 D1—Pg46 Project #: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - A. Planning Department 32. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 33. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 34. A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: 0 percent - 48-inch box or larger, 10 percent - 36-inch box or larger, 10 percent - 24- inch box or larger, 80 percent - 15-gallon. 35. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 36. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 37. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 38. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 39. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 40. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. Panted: 913012014 vmw.CllyofRC.u9 Page 4 of 16 D1—Pg47 Project #: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: Location: Project Type: 8 unit townhouse 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 41. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 42. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 43. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 44. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 45. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber -to -the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 46. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 47. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building and Safety Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 48. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Manager, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 49. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 50. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. vrwv.CilyofRC.us Printed: 9/30/2014 Page 5 of i6 Project #: SUBTTIS928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: Location: Project Type: 8 unit townhouse 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 51. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 52. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 53. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. 54. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 55. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 56. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 57. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 58. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 59. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. 60. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 61. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. Printed: 9/30/2014 W'MN.City0fRC.US Page 6 of 16 D1—Pg49 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 8 unit townhouse 7490 CARNELIAN ST- 020702211-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; A. Planning Department 62. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 63. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall submit to the City applicable recorded documentation that establishes, and/or ensures the continuation of, agreements, easements, etc. for the purpose of mutual/reciprocal use, access, parking, and maintenance. Statements noting these agreements, easements, etc. shall be included on the Final Map. 64. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 65. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 66. All garage doors shall have decorative windows that match the theme of the corresponding house. 67. Approval is for the subdivision of a 1.02 acre parcel into eight (8) individual lots for the purposes of constructing an 8-unit townhouse development within the Medium Residential District located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. 68. The development shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Medium Residential District as described in the Development Code. 69. All building construction shall be in accordance with the following, Acoustical Analysis that was prepared and submitted to the Planning Department on December 9, 2013: a. Add STC 24 glazing to the Unit 2 Kitchen b. Add STC 28 glazing to the Unit 1 Living Room, Dining Room and Bedroom 3 (west side bedroom) c. Add STC 34 glazing to the Unit 1 Kitchen, Master Bedroom and Bedroom 2 (east side bedroom) The above glazing upgrade shall apply to all windows and doors in the specified room regardless of whether they face Carnelian Street or not. 70, Provide Unit -to -Unit noise control on building construction plans as noted in the Acoustical Analysis. Pnnted: 9/3012014 w .CityofRC.us Page 7 of 16 D1—Pg50 Project #: SUETT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Carnelian Street Curb & Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Curbside drain outlet 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one F building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 4. Install double yellow striping and a stop sign on -site. 5. An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Carnelian Street shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of project frontage on Carnelian Street. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Printed: 913012014 www.CltyofRC.us - Page 9 of 16 D1—Pg51 Project #: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. Engineerinq Services Department 8. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 9. Street improvement plans shall be designed for the full length of the project frontage. If during plan check it becomes apparent that installing portions of the ultimate improvements will be infeasible due to conflicts with existing improvements to the north and/or south, install as much of the improvements as ,possible and deposit a cash contribution in lieu of construction for the balance. Said contribution shall include removal of interim improvements and completion of grading for both street and parkway improvements. Contribution in lieu of construction shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 10. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on Carnelian Street 11. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 12. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 13. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 14. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. Printed: 9/30/2014 myw.CityofRC.u6 Page 9 of 16 D1—Pg52 Project #: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: Location: Project Type: 8 unit townhouse 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. Engineering Services Department 17. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 18. Carnelian Street frontage shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with City "Secondary' standards as required and including: a. Provide curb and gutter, street trees, commercial drive approach, curbside drain outlets and sidewalk, as required. b. Provide one (1) 9500 Lumens HPSV street light. c. Protect or provide traffic striping and signage, as required. d. Drive approach to be in accordance with the City Std. Dwg. 101, Type C. 19. Transitions to existing curb and gutter on the north and south project boundaries shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pnnted: 9/30/2014 P .CityofRC.us Page 10 of 16 D1—Pg53 Project #: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: Location: Project Type: 8 unit townhouse 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Engineering Services Department 20. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Carnelian Street Botanical Name - Magnolia grandiflora "St. Mary" Common Name - NCN Min. Grow Space - 3' Spacing - 20' O.C. Size - 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 21, A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 22. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. C. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit 1. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing, pavement marking and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for review and approval. 2. Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access — Fire Lanes Standard and the current edition of California Fire Code for specific requirements. 3. Knox Rapid Entry System: are required in accordance to the RCFPD Residential Vehicular Gate Standard and the RCFPD Knox Box Installation Standard. Printed: 9/30/2014 �.CltyofRC.us Page 11 of 16 D1-Pg54 Project #: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: Location: Project Type: 8 unit townhouse 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211 -0000 Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 4. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #5-3. 5. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 6. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial and multi -family buildings shall post the building addresses, address monuments, site directories, directional signage and suite designations in accordance to RCFPD Multi -Family Residential Addressing Standard. 7. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 8. Construction Access and Fire Protection Water Supply: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. Please refer to the RCFPD Standards# 14-1 & 14-2 for the requirements specific to fire protection water supply and fire department access during construction. 9. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any, Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 10. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 11. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 %" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. Pnntedi 9/30/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 16 D1—Pg55 Project #: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST - 020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. C. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit 13. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on -site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on -site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on -site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 14. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 15. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system (in accordance with RCFPD Standard) must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. Include a copy of the approved underground plans as reference with the overhead submittal. 16. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial and multi -family buildings shall post the building addresses, address monuments, site directories, directional signage and suite designations in accordance to RCFPD Multi -Family Residential Addressing Standard. 17. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 18. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed' in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 19. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8'/2" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. Pnnted: 9/30/2014 ww .CityofRC.us Page 13 of 16 D1—Pg56 RESOLUTION NO. 17-86 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A 1-YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR DRC2017-00652 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 18928 FOR AN 8-UNIT TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT ON 1.02 ACRES IN THE MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ON THE WEST SIDE OF CARNELIAN STREET, APPROXIMATELY 180 FEET SOUTH OF CALLE DEL PRADO, LOCATED AT 7490 CARNELIAN STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0207-022-11 A. Recitals 1. Alex Mustapha filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map 18928, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of October, 2014, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 14-46, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On 11th day of October, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on October 11, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 1.02-acre parcel located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11: and b. The abutting properties to the north of the subject site contain single-family residential and townhomes which are located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the east, across Carnelian Street, consist of single-family residential that are located within the Low (L) Residential District; the properties to the south, consist of single-family residential and a water tank located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the west, contains a flood channel located within the Flood Control (FC) District; and C. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 is in substantial compliance with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies; and DI—Pg57 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-86 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00652—ALEX MUSTAPHA October 11, 2017 Page 2 d. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 for one (1) additional year. The expiration date with approval of the subject time extension will be October 8, 2018. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, Ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is to subdivide the property for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acres is consistent with the Development Code; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The surrounding parcels to the north, south, and east are developed with single- family residential units and townhome units, the parcel to the west is a flood control channel; and C. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide an existing parcel of land for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acres is consistent with the development and density of the surrounding parcels of land; and d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City; and e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Projects) because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 is October 11, 2018. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-46 for SUBTT18928 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2017-00652. 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution D1—Pg58 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-86 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00652 — ALEX MUSTAPHA October 11, 2017 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of October, 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D1—Pg59 Y STAFF REPORT DATE: October 11. 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2017-00391 - FENG XIAO ARCHITECT, INC - A proposed design modification for six (6) previously approved single-family homes in the Low (L) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court; APN: 0201-182-36. The City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Design Review Modification DRC2017- 00391 through adoption of the attached Resolution. PROJECT REVIEW BACKGROUND: On November 10, 2010, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 18391, a request to subdivide a property comprised of 3 parcels into 6 parcels in the Low (L) Residential District located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court. On April 22, 2015, the Planning Commission approved Development Review DRC2013- 00914, a review of 6 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision in the Low (L) Residential District located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court. Since the dates of approval for the tentative tract map and design/architecture of the homes, there has been limited activity on -site aside from the removal of trees and demolition of the single-family residence on the property. Also, the property was sold to another developer. Following meetings with Staff to discuss revisions to the architecture of the homes, it was determined that the revisions were substantial enough to warrant the submittal of an application to modify the original project for consideration by the Planning Commission. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is comprised of 3 parcels with combined dimensions of 659 feet north -to -south by 178 feet east -to -west and an area of approximately 2.8 acres (122,000 square feet). The site previously contained a single-family residence, which has been demolished. To the south, east, and west are single-family residences. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the D2-Pg 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00391 — FENG XIAO October 11, 2017 Page 2 north side is 1,783 feet and at the south side the elevation is 1,767 feet, but because of significant change in the slope at the south property line of the site, the elevation is 1,755 feet. Land Use; ; '' ' General; Plan:,`..; Zonm .; . Site Vacant Low Residential Low L Residential District North Vacant Low Residential Low L Residential District South Single-family residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District East Single-family residences Low Residential Low L Residential District West Single-family residences Low Residential Low L Residential District ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot of the above -noted subdivision for a total of 6 single-family residences (Exhibits C & D). The floor areas of the houses (floor area excluding garages) will range between 3,841 square feet (Lot 1) to 4,647 square feet (Lot 6) (Exhibit F). Two of the houses (Lots 1 and 6) will be one-story, while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story. This equates to 33 percent of the lots having single -story houses. This percentage of one and two-story homes complies with Development Code Section 17.122.010 that requires 25 percent of all single-family detached units within single-family residential development consisting of 4 or more units to be single -story. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code. The applicant proposes a single architectural theme that incorporates the form/massing and details derived from Italian and Mediterranean architecture (Exhibit F). Architectural elements utilize concrete roof tile, exposed rafter tails, smooth stucco finish, stone veneer, decorative entry door and garage door, wood shutters, and multi -paned windows. The application proposes 5 distinct footprints; Unit 1 floor plan is used once on Lot 1, Unit 2 floor plan is used twice on Lots 2 and 4, Unit 3 floor plan is used twice on Lots 3 and 5 (Lot 5 is a reverse footprint), and Unit 4 floor plan is used once on Lot 6. The number of available footprints complies with Development Code requirements (Exhibit F). The Development Code requires 2 elevations per footprint. The footprint on Lots 1 and 6 (Units 1 and 4) are each used once, so a second elevation of each footprint was not necessary. The footprint for Lots 2 and 4 (Unit 2), and Lots 3 and 5 (Unit 3) are each used twice and have two separate elevations for each footprint. The resulting mix of building footprints and elevations is that no building elevation will be duplicated within the project. B. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Macias, and Granger) on September 5, 2017 (Exhibit G). The Committee reviewed the previously approved elevations and revised elevations proposed by the applicant. They accepted the revised elevations as submitted and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. C. Technical Review Committee: As the subject application does not propose any revisions to the previously approved tentative tract map, and the proposal does not impact any of the technical details of the project such as grading, street improvements, etc., Staff determined that review by this Committee was not necessary. D2—Pg 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00391 — FENG XIAO October 11, 2017 Page 3 D. Neighborhood Meeting: On September 4, 2017, a neighborhood meeting was conducted by the applicant at the Rancho Cucamonga Central Park located at 11200 Base Line Road. Three residents, representing 2 adjacent properties, attended. All attendees were in support of the project. They asked questions regarding 1-story and 2-story unit placement, building setbacks, perimeter walls, and the timing of grading and unit construction. The applicant addressed these questions indicating that lots 1 and 6 will have 1-story units, while lots 2 to 5 will have 2-story units, all lots will meet minimum setback requirements, perimeter walls will be installed prior to unit construction, and that construction is anticipated to begin after project approval. E. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18931. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. The associated tentative tract map was for the purpose of developing the property with single-family residences. Therefore, the construction and operational characteristics of the project are as anticipated. The tentative tract map is substantially the same as was approved. There are no significant physical changes to the map such as the layout of the lots, grading, and fence/wall heights. Conditions on -site and on adjacent properties are generally the same as they were when the map was reviewed and approved. The site is surrounded by residential structures/uses and no significant new development has occurred in the general vicinity. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less -than -significant. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the application, the design review application is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the D2—Pg 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00391 — FENG XIAO October 11, 2017 Page 4 Development Code which will facilitate the development of the subject property with single-family residences consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Map. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A — Vicinity Map Exhibit B — Site Utilization Map Exhibit C — Site Plan (Site Plan, Enlarged Site Plan) Exhibit D — Grading Plan Exhibit E — Street Elevation Exhibit F — Architectural Plans (Floorplan, Roof Plan, & Elevation) Exhibit G — Design Review Committee Action Agenda for September 5, 2017 Exhibit H - Staff Report (without exhibits) for Tentative Tract Map 18391 Exhibit I - Resolution of Approval No. 10-51 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2017-00391 CB:TG/Is D2—Pg 4 Vicinity Map Design Review D RC2017=00391 Project Site E m U I Base Line Church Arrow ! c 8th w ? 1 C7 6th 4th -- i6thw Line Church Foothill Arrow City Hall N A EXHIBIT A D2-Pg 5 TITLE: SITE UTILIZATION MAP --MATE MAY 06. 2017 FORDEPARWNTUSE A.DRESG,,��E LEGAL."IWIG.: 111 1 T I I I E 111 1, 111 1 1.- 1 1 'C , , a , a tt PflOPFRiY...RE1 CM. C.T.A I LA� USE ENTITLEIVE14T CONSULTANTS APPLIC�W S ACREAGE IEG.IE' A, ll.+ wl L ULL E. .0�T SrT 1110 Ewo iilgt�i p-R I f !jig. ffwm 11111111.0111 1 5.0 _1- 3 I, z rc�p � m �1 � ! g 9 1 1 Wc^ � II 9;9 I _ ` d k ghw5o w EH a �o©000ccec ease i 9 Y -Y� a 13 Li FM MEI��Y�J�iI :: 5WWO �� ' lFOM _i 0■ i Pro L ?i 1 1 ; a l I /] d 'All as � aC3m12MC3laacl.se.a . . . ! 1 3 1 , tp■ | | I! | | | i ---- \ � `~~ Itinoo a I=g �� oocooccoc oeeee e p� V O o � 118a e� rIt33 ! i 4 3 � p >F 4 i i 3 S a q;2 r S i i i 4 i IT S I ianoo uals3HONM 5 3a: ]4 � 5 § � i a 4 5 • s - O Y a U t; NZj } s iwoo 8;MHOMM yyy!e'�+ 44gap #E�xy y3 fmMI! PHI Iffl1i '°'� u '3� �M Hill o©cooccoceeeee O r— la e S 04 M1 M g 9 iunoo \\ b3i23HONM o £ z pup �n yO m! ILu�L9 H >}�Aa!! �.i�i�l;!|!!:�!! '• ` . � ma .......�.....� ;w »: ���(�\ \/{\ �^(/ \ \k t \\ , � E /u �_ . \«� \/� \� \»� � § i Ir a 1 e I�>m e Oi I o a z vi I 3 �i 3 IWAR ps I I CD � f rl J. I" I ----------- I � y U�wU� i g e f��r,_ g g I I I gl ,I I I I I arse E E 9r 0 EXHIBIT D 71!��c COW F EXHIBIT E 3 E! y9@ yg,�e JIM"!111111,11 1y5 (�ti z5 ia la, rid 1 � s y $ 4�3 r9S y 4 '�Y O 6 Y A£Ia all- }1111 Y 9 W Z Z ` 10=Q G 0 EXHIBIT F R N C) 0 Ilk iiiiI/\^\ ( % )( \ uii p �$$Sy9 WHO9S"a HIN 8�Y € ?� :83 i F z€� p�p �pya� o r am � 000e t ypw��o N883Ym€�&33�4 ug is93§ w;ii�so$b t��2w9�3 �0 $ p�ng-giu h�Ss° i ILh n:I LI $" t ) � g9l.`]j ` I \ \H } x §!9 •s e |..�. ! < gg9S �� p9� ka'z3a lu��� �b noA O e� ' ' :. � nmmmnnmmmi Will NW b bb6666 Sbbbbbbbbbbbobbbb b bb6666 a�b 6666pbbbbbSSb6bbS b bpbbbb bbbbbbbbbbbbb bbbb . mma2pp�ppppp6p "b�b�ggg gg4 ygB ygy g�bHp6 `5 N 3'y RON �j]�ej] a � 3,11wd���3�U e �Ssy � 35W53 i53e53 3]�3]� S3°�S3 ° � z o a 30333 3ie3i� y55 019 18 8gs' 5999AB as 9 M �e°g$22 96 M, � 5$E55959pc5�3 ICI 1 111 1111111/ !! E§ -- .\ � §\*�@HIM G j ; `| "• \ _ � . ± (, \ - R eon u 9LL CO 61 fill 5 4pR5iR 33?i�?9Rt3 a = 1 9 • ___ _-____ ___ ______________ 11II j 1 I I 1 1 I I I j 1 err 1 I T l 1 I 1 1 b 1 1 I 1 - I I I 14 pb 6 ' I - 4 1 4 � I 1 1 I _ r _ _ 1 1 I I I I 1 - 1 1 is I 1 1 1 -4 2-P-g-26 50t; aim �! w a i >F LO a LO 43 d i ;�Pg 5�•f 5 W 3daAa,S iw� y yy z&°z PH PRIM Es?��16 Hug g m g °oF $ k g a 1. 9 eg , .i yk3g3g 33' a�I3�g3g�gg�Yy HIM �3$0 $s3 9s a b� a s I o s d O f, 1�rcvoiw t II ii p� sz� O n�w x �} Rd d|| � )� ! | ] ; \q\\\\\} !"" §/; •f \\wa 4Ke[ #(§kq§§! . { \))§§)()| ,l,;MI HJ 1111l F- h ;a e Q u �F t� S b k ns e 4 it ' SI _ ® e .g w a 36Q � � ry WZ^ zww JCS f O'''111C N � <1 x{ . - E) u a;e ,./ M u\ \/ Cl) . \` \� /: 0 / / .3 ;! M @ \ <} \/ /|*@ })h| / ((/ |.._,, .,.. |. ( / ( i w ' usw ogyo U9 is e 3 LO a O djp� S 33g �11, 19,1y53pyy co $Yy3Py 3 I �zry wz a w D2 Pc}35- py3y �4 �:. F 55�� 59�gi9 E�85� �$k5l�� MINNq $�z�@� * L= 3�� 33 j� e. •u ¢ �Jp bbbbbbA Sbbbb aW ® q b ---- -- 6h bh 4 p 0 4 e O O - s © a e ......: YAe—:Rel�krfeli:eit<I gQ Cq JQH, F nj bbbbbb W d 6a 5666 `6 ® � bbbbbhb ��AM g�g ° 13 3q 11 €€;€ O yy ypy yy �bb ai �ima IIIII�I o ® ® ;3==NNE WHO r,. OHM �I 2—P-q-36 e� Gg `"��— �� � a q'!X$q$ ills, b bb6bbbbbb666bbbb b bbbbbSSbbbbbbbbb b66666b66666bbggF66 �A�N���xaa�� g�b �s$es=�W_sasea=Wa pW 39a AA1�„�o IBM �-��Sa h.i ��Sx� w�H ����sa gg6 EH�es��A� 99 g S�gB� �q35q �59 �E�Q�4=5�g�3g ��$E qg5 W�x�s �33y g�g9p5pggB �) )$)jPRO { �} & § Offli | I L: !\ o&| )(I ■/ A a 2 �} \ ) Pep )) �} & !; a !! @ \ { 5zN rm a p0. � 0 o aay- = e%: ' s k-F aa ''�1 9¢ggPqagG€` Z> e� 8 Q �®O� 4yquxp3°3a SppGGab Rs�Ry®Jcf2ok� 33$$yoy ld° 0 Zi j S9 3 g g �qe €wg E gg $gam G u"�w 4� Mg� 2p Lwge gu „ws�s �,3�€��8£ w�SZ 81 $Es$s3Y«1°��a>3�°99 0 y 3 f{� v Fj g f. P�3�1 I I�1 IF is � la s5 'a IBM! ggQ9saFA t3 ` ItligigY3ffxMy�li! Oil OY w�F it 8 Q �w �Yw I' '�F Ell e s ]� �S �. 3w� I �# a `� �` � �. ❑LJ I t5 �FY ,��❑7 e ED LJF d ;� r yi y l '_Tr �Dy TIT _Wm ! 1�S _I 1 ..t E I Ala _ n YI• i pt f ��r sit 11t r .Iy Gl 11 i� III v � , 1 1 I it 1 � I I � it �5 ��� ��€ �tl�� shy �� f4C �q� � � ill �oW T""-m y Zq� gill o� p wy 3 8���� pig g �.��� a8tY8 HIM I � I wz�w a o ®® ®e3yW k $ y'u7 'All HMO 3 d� bhbbhb bbbbb sy� y���� yy.� �5 yy 5 bbtibhb bbbbb Elm BIRO a pp e ?8aca 23 -----11 '9 a °❑ Ftl m g � 8 n a a.e 6 6 bbbbbbh U © bbbbbbh O 5.6'n ubbbb O. a a O O �;b bbbbb6 b �a nay �y y 6 ° R. g°g3�3gwg gwg gwg 9w o x xeex 3 o MEN pKp �S�p�pRRNq ¢t¢�Krcgd � 3YYY3t� � y3g +v°�S, �eyyi vym�yS{ �ddLddtli yyI �[ 3T33?i3 888 88 €fill, §33 11,8,11 S e p I i IM i 5666666666bbbbbbb b bbS66666666bbbbb b bbbbb666bbbb66Fb ��A���ba�x�aaFaxb <go< �e5oe5 su9 $o$'a u9 u$9$ {°{opy��^ra MEIN KgKKK �u K. ,3oTTFFFF°-IT° 9KK.�' �F¢�i 'Td q4 �$i y�y4�4�SS°CsC 9L R$Ri Y Fi pupT a' tK u�lt rcx �9 WpW4rs4 e�t94 6�y�y�55%yky% pLt "ul tY wulw eggi� p�ww�gw gw ��ywy µ°ul ry$, d �dddd�dd���b3dd y�y55 yyyy�A yyyyyg3yg yg�ygyydyy µµy�y 3 x}3y+yWPM i ss �3 ��8��83�����3��� s ss gs i333333;333���a�33 gs Q» ■ ! { k M C. LO a g s + sz dl u pF a I o LO X:old a� w a • z .3a8a � €sMIA �€M A 3 3 is. 3 is e YIR's t fl Ill IIfil o� ag�a 1,29HR �I§1111, riT g� 3r� jN 91 I 11 1, FFTT iVY{. v tlYty 9 A4 13 ; § \§.g C! id4o R§,k /\ k� OR IL! - H , | | \ |] � ) § 3 § | ) Ugk q� ,$!k� q\��,;; Mg )!6R /3. „ _ ,. ,..,, ,. r�\ M2� � q. . <) !)Q&� , §}§@j {� dIN # ;!! 3 R 0R z _ OIZI RIp sIg3ap� fflo 1 a w i z x z e� z L—w 14 "HIP 3wzN $FYl1 ,u FF 'O ® cb 0 ❑ o p ix ® O O ❑ ® a O C © s A A GC �r�b ® zh b § ��] O m. F Q I® 8 j„ _v a.e OID m o 9cc �h s ®l 18 o �m� A O O Cp 6 �a 0 0 0 2—Pg4 0 ) / .e )dam /| \ \ |) \ ( § !§ - . I 1 I 1 !q� A bl, ` R log \ M; . | old §§ 9 (ƒ J d 5 | \�.\ '[! ƒ|! /%y . (! \ � �g g'8 ��y=H$� gg. $i� \©���^�^/� . \� / / � � � . § «� � < , � �� ) . :� / \ ! �� �\ : � � \ � }�� \ƒ ` ^� � % } � w� , » }� 2 . � � � . 2 «� /}. , 2% 2® \ r�/) _ » �� J Z . � \��| j ^ � / \ } �� � k � �.� � .'/� � � \/2 | � . . ,. .\ �\ i .� -»'ay . �^ �� Jam\ �� � �{`��� }� \� �\, . < < . , .7 < Z ����fdT��` �� . . ?^6 » o � \. � (/ 2\ °. SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly X 7 00 P M Rich Macias X Candyce Burnett Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present Tabe van der Lwaaq. Asociatu F'i,uiner and Tom Grahn A.asociate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. C1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20080 — MANNING HOMES — A review of a proposed 20-lot subdivision on a parcel of about 5.43 acres of land in the Low Residential (L) District (2.0 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre) located at the EXHIBIT G Pagb) (J53 SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE :ACTION AGENDA :00u CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street; APN: 1076-081-01; Related Files: Design Review DRC2017-00129, Variance DRC2017-00130, Minor Exception DRC2017- 00131 and Landmark Designation DRC2017-00485. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00129 — MANNING HOMES — A request for site plan and architectural review of 19 single-family residential homes in conjunction with a 20-lot subdivision of about 5.43 acres of land within the Low Residential (L) District (2.0 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street; APN: 1076-081-01; Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20080, Variance DRC2017-00130, Minor Exception DRC2017-00131 and Landmark Designation DRC2017-00485. The Committee recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review subject to the applicant adding windows to all of the garage doors. C2. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 - MANNING HOMES - A request for site plan and architectural review of 16 single-family residences on 8.32 acres of land within the Low (L) District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan on the south side of Carnesi Drive and east of Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0227-061-03 and 82. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2013-00961, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2013-00962, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936, Variance DRC2014-00219 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014- 00113. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. The Committee approved as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. C3. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2017-00391 - FENG XIAO ARCHITECT, INC - A proposed design modification for six (6) previously approved single-family homes in the Low (L) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court; APN: 020118236. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. The Committee reviewed the initial proposal and revised elevation provided by the applicant and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. D. ADJOURNMENT 7:29 P.M. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. Pag,bJ ,*d 54 I 14 SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist II with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, August 24, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Pagbi—*f 55 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tom Grahn September 5, 2017 DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2017-00391 - FENG XIAO ARCHITECT, INC - A proposed design modification for six (6) previously approved single-family homes in the Low (L) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court; APN: 020118236. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. Background: On November 10, 2010, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map 18391, a request to subdivide a property comprised of 3 parcels into 6 parcels in the Low (L) Residential District located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court. On April 22, 2015, the Planning Commission approved Development Review DRC2013-00914, a review of 6 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision in the Low (L) Residential District located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court. Design Parameters: The project site is comprised of 3 parcels with combined dimensions of 659 feet (north to south) by 178 feet (east to west) and an area of 2.8 acres (122,000 square feet). The project site is located 200 feet south of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court, on the east side of Winchester Court. The site previously contained a single-family residence, which has been demolished. To the south, east, and west are single-family residences. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is 1,783 feet and at the south side the elevation is 1,767 feet, but because of a significant change in the slope at the south property line of the site, the elevation is 1,755 feet. The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot of the above -noted subdivision for a total of 6 single-family residences. The floor areas of the houses (floor area excluding garages) will range between 3,841 square feet (Lot 1) to 4,647 square feet (Lot 6). Two of the houses (Lots 1 and 6) will be one-story, while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story. This equates to 33 percent of the lots having single -story houses. This percentage of one and two-story homes complies with Development Code Section 17.122.010 that requires 25 percent of all single-family detached units within single-family residential development consisting of 4 or more units to be single -story. As noted previously, the project site is mostly bound by existing residential development. The subdivision to the south (Tract 10827) is approximately 10 feet lower in elevation than the project site. Reducing the finished elevations of the proposed subdivision to match Tract 10827 is not possible as the subdivision to the west (Tract 16421) and Winchester Court have finished elevations that are also higher than that of Tract 10827. The finished elevations of the project must be at, or near, the same elevation as the street for practical reasons such as adequate storm water drainage and homeowner access to each lot. The project includes the construction of perimeter and interior property line walls. The wall along the east property line will be a conventional screen wall of 6'feet in height. The walls proposed along the north property line, and between Lots 5 and 6 will be combination walls comprised of screen walls of 5 feet in height on top of a retaining wall. The retaining wall height will vary depending on the differences between finished grades. D2—Pg56 DRC COMMENTS DRC2017-00378 — FENG XIAO ARCHITECT, INC. September 5, 2017 Page 2 The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code. The applicant proposes a single architectural theme that incorporates the form/massing and details derived from Italian and Mediterranean architecture. Architectural elements utilize concrete roof tile, exposed rafter tails, smooth stucco finish, stone veneer, decorative entry door and garage door, wood shutters, and multi -paned windows. The application proposes 5 distinct footprints; Plan one is used once on Lot 1, Plan two is used twice on Lots 2 and 4, Plan three is used twice on Lots 3 and 5 (Lot 5 is a reverse footprint), and Plan four is used once on Lot 6. The number of available footprints complies with Development Code requirements; however, the number of elevations do not comply. The Development Code requires 2 elevations per footprint. The footprint on Plans 1 and 4 are each used once, so an additional elevation is not necessary. The footprint for Plans 2 and 3 are each used twice and should have two separate elevations. To address this, staff has provided several solutions (see Major Issues below). Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Per Development Code Table 17.122.010-1, two (2) elevations per footprint are required. The following is recommended in order for the project to comply with this requirement: a. Plan 2: Provide an alternate elevation so that the units on Lots 2 and 4 are architecturally distinct from one another. Incorporate the use of decorative stone, vary the trim and details around the windows, and vary the color scheme. b. Plan 3. Although Lot 5 is a reverse footprint of Lot 3, the architecture should be revised to provide an alternate elevation so that the units on Lots 3 and 5 are architecturally distinct from one another. Incorporate the use of decorative stone, vary the trim and details around the windows, and vary the color scheme. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. There are no secondary design issues. During the early design review process staff requested that architectural elements utilized on the front elevation be used on the rear elevation and the plans were revised accordingly. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. No policy issues have been identified. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the applicant provide the requisite number of elevations as required per the Code. If the applicant revises the number of elevations to the satisfaction of the Committee, subject to the revisions noted above, staff recommends that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. If the applicant does not revise the project to the satisfaction of the Committee, the project will be required to return to the Design Review Committee for further review. D2—Pg 57 STAFF REPORT PLANNINGDEPARTmENr 14 Date: November 10, 2010 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18391 - LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN - A request to subdivide a property comprised of 3 parcels into 6 parcels in the Low (L) Residential District located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court - APN: 0201-182-36, 37, and 38. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residence; Low (L) Residential District South - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District East - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District West - Single -Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels with combined dimensions of approximately 659 feet (north to south) by approximately 178 feet (east to west) and an area of approximately 122,000 square feet (2.8 acres), located approximately 200 feet south of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court on the east side of Winchester Court (Exhibit B). The site is partially developed with a single-family residence. There are several trees throughout the site. To the north, south, and west are single-family residences, while to the north there was a single-family residence that was recently demolished. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District. The subject property slopes north to south. The elevation at the north side is approximately 1,783 feet. At the south side, the elevation is generally approximately 1,767 feet but, because of a significant change in slope, at the south property line of the site, the elevation is approximately 1,755 feet. ANALYSIS A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 6 lots for a single-family residential development (Exhibit D); the applicant does not intend to construct the homes at this time. The single-family residence and accessory structures will be removed. All lots will comply with the EXHIBIT H D2—Pg58 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 2 development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in the Development Code. Individual lot areas will range between 10,270 square feet to 20,147 square feet (which are well in excess of the minimum of 7,200 square feet with a minimum average of 8,000 square feet), the depth of each lot will be at least 178 feet, and the width of each lot will be an average of at least 65 feet (Exhibit G). All of the lots will be conventional in design and will mirror the lots of the subdivision directly across the street (Related file: Tract 16421). Access to the project site will be via Winchester Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16421 but unfinished public right-of- way improvements — including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter - on the east side of the street are missing and will be completed at the time this project site is developed with homes. The proposed grading will be similar to the subdivision across the street, and the proposed finished pads of each lot will be stepped to follow the slope of Winchester Court. A series of combination screen/retaining walls between most of the lots except at Lots 1 and 2 will be required. Each of these walls will have an overall height that will exceed the maximum of 6 feet. To address this, the applicant has submitted an application for a Minor Exception (Related file: Minor Exception DRC2010-00113). There will not be any walls in excess of 6 feet along the east property line shared with the residences to the east. Another atypical characteristic of the subdivision is the significant grade difference of approximately 7 feet between Lot 6 and the subdivision to the south. Typically, the applicant would be required to reduce such grade differences to as close to zero as possible, but the finished surface elevation of Winchester Court, the sewer line beneath it, and the finished grades of the property to the west and east preclude this option. Therefore, when a house is built on Lot 6, that house will be situated higher than the residence to the south. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Lions Center East located at 9161 Base Line Road on August 9, 2010. Several individuals from the surrounding community attended. None of them had any specific objections to the project. However, there were concerns about impacts related to construction activity including fugitive dust and noise. The attendees acknowledged that these impacts were a common characteristic of construction but wanted it minimized. Staff stated to the attendees the applicant's proposal does not include house product so grading would be limited to rough grading (if any) and there would not be any construction activity associated with this application. Nevertheless, there are mitigation measures that must be followed by developers to control dust and noise. Measures to control dust will include the use of a water truck to stabilize soil and prevent it from becoming airborne, ceasing construction during strong winds, and a variety of barriers to prevent water runoff. The principal means to control noise will be to limit the hours of construction. Staff also noted to the attendees that in the event such measures were not being followed, they could contact the City (or other agencies like the Air Quality Management District) to investigate the problem and, if there is a violation, require the applicant to correct the violation. There were also questions about the scope of the public improvements. Staff indicated the developer would be required to provide all improvements. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and James) reviewed the application on September 14, 2010. The Committee accepted the proposal and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. D2—Pg 59 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 3 D. Design Review Committees: The Design Review Committee (Munoz and Granger) reviewed the application on September 14, 2010 (Exhibit F). The Committee accepted the proposal noting that the overall design was typical, and nearly identical, to the subdivision across the street. The Committee recommends approval to the Planning Commission. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Demolition of the Existing Residence: To ensure that the demolition of the existing residence would not result in the loss of a culturally or historically important resource, staff requested that the applicant research the background of the house. According to a report submitted by Joe A. Ramos, an architect, the structure has no cultural or historical significance (Exhibit H). F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQX) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality, noise, air quality and cultural resources, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No comments have been received. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Respectfully submitted, Jam. R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JRT:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Site Plan/Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 Exhibit E - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments, dated September 14, 2010 Exhibit G - Table 17.08.040-B Basic Development Standards Exhibit H - Analysis of Existing Residence with Photographs Exhibit I - Initial Study Parts I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTPM18391 D2—Pg 60 RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT1 8391, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PROPERTY COMPRISED OF 3 PARCELS INTO 6 PARCELS IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF WINCHESTER COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APNS: 0201-182-36, - 37, AND -38. A. Recitals. 1. Land Development Design Corporation, on behalf of Amin Khan, filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of November 2010, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on November 10, 2010, including written and oral staff reports, togetherwith public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three (3) parcels with combined dimensions of approximately 659 feet (north to south) by approximately 178 feet (east to west) and an area of approximately 122,000 square feet (2.8 acres), located approximately 200 feet south of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court on the east side of Winchester Court; b. To the north, south, and west are single-family residences, while to the north there was a recently demolished single-family residence; and C. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District; and d. The site is partially developed with a single-family residence. Vegetation on -site includes short grasses, shrubs and trees; and e. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into six (6) lots for a single-family residential development. The applicant does not intend to construct the homes at this time; and f. Individual lot areas will range between 10,270 square feet to 20,216 square feet with an average of 12,697 square feet (these dimensions exceed the minimum of 7,200 square feet with a minimum average of 8,000 square feet), the depth of each lot will be at least 100 feet, and the width of each lot will be at least 65 feet; and EXHIBIT I D2—Pg61 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 2 g. As the applicant has not submitted any applications to develop the site, any proposals for construction of residential structures on these parcels will be subject to review and action by the Planning Commission at a later date. These parcels will remain vacant until then; and h. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Winchester Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16421 but unfinished public right-of-way improvements — including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter - on the east side of the street are missing and will be completed at the time this project site is developed with homes. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; b. The design or improvements of the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code; C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; e. The Tentative Tract Map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; f. The design of the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record befofe it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. D2—Pg 62 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 3 C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. Pursuant to the requirements of California Fish and Game Code Section 711.4 and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, Section 753.5, the Planning Commission finds, based on the Initial Study, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and considering the record as a whole, that there is no evidence before the City that the proposed project will have the potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. The site has been previously disced and weed abated. Based on substantial evidence, the Planning Commission hereby makes a declaration rebutting the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in California Department of Fish and Game Regulation 753.5 (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations Code, Section 753.5.) 5. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of three (3) parcels (APN: 0201-182-36, 37, and 38) of approximately 122,000 square feet (2.8 acres) located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court into six (6) separate parcels. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Low (L) Residential District as described in Table 17.08.040-Basic Development Standards. 3) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the existing single-family residence, and associated structures and improvements shall be demolished and removed from the project site. 4) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, all lots shall be rough graded to include building pads and interim improvements (for example, drainage) as deemed necessary by the City. 5) Prior to construction, all future homes and associated improvements shall require the review and approval by the City and the issuance of applicable building permits by the Building and Safety Department. The site plotting and architecture of these homes (and accessory structures) shall require the review and approval by the Design Review Committee prior to Planning Director and/or Planning Commission action. 6) All setback lines shall be shown on the Final Map. D2—Pg 63 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 4 7) Double-wall/fence conditions shall be eliminated, if possible. The applicant shall coordinate with the property owners to the east any activity relating to new wall construction along the common property lines. 8) Prior to the removal of any trees on the property, the applicant shall submit a Tree Removal permit and fee for review and approval by the Planning Director or Planning Commission. Building and Safety (Grading) 1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit as part of the grading and drainage plan submittal package an updated topographic survey map showing the additional grading which was performed on the project site without permit(s). 2) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard -lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 3) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4) Unpermitted grading activities have occurred on the subject parcel. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall include a topographic map of the subject parcel(s) showing the additional unpermitted earth placement, 5) Section E-E shows the existing retaining wall south of the southerly property line of Lot 6 retaining a level backfill. This wall is owned and maintained by the adjacent property owner. Section E-E and the plan view proposes a 2:1 slope to be placed against this existing retaining wall. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, provide preliminary calculations showing the existing retaining wall may withstand the additional soil pressure of the proposed 2:1 slope without failing, or provide an alternate design along the south property line. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also D2—Pg 64 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 5 conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high -volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on -site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCBj) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PMIo) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric orclean alternative fuel -powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. D2—Pg 65 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 —LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 6 10) Projects shall be developed under the proposed 2010 General Plan Update implementing the following measures, derived from the SCAQMD's AQMP, where feasible, in order to reduce criteria air pollutant emissions, primarily related to vehicular travel and energy. Potential measures for consideration in future projects include: • Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. • Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. • Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. • All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. • All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 11) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) Trees that are removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a minimum 15-gallon sized tree. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. D2—Pg 66 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 7 • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel makethe discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino Country Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off -site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mp'h to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. D2—Pg 67 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 8 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW QCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on -site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An erosion control plan shall be prepared, included in the grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on -site and off -site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This erosion control plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on -site or off -site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by CTK, Inc., to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineerfor approval of WQMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on -site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 9 Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2010. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C9-Y-OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Luis Munoz, Jr., Chairman ATTEST: ! NV Ja V s R. Troyer', AICP; Sec etary D2—Pg 69 PLANNING COMMISSION RESULUTION NO. 10-51 SUBTT18391 — LAND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN November 10, 2010 Page 10 I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of November 2010, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WIMBERLY ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE D2—Pg 70 COMMUNITYDEVELOPMEN DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTT18391 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: LAND DEVELOPMENT DESING CORPORATION FOR AMIN KHAN 200 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE, EAST SIDE OF WINCHESTER —APN: 0201-182- LOCATION: 36, 37 AND 38. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 10-51, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $2, 060.25 X B. Time Limits 1. This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. SC-12-08 1 Completion Date I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT d9831911StdCond 11-10.doc Project No. SUBTT18391 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with: Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. D. Landscaping Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. E. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 567 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. —/—/— I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc D2—Pg 72 Project No. SUBTT18391 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (SUBTT18391) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. G. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (SUBTT18391). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc D2—Pg 73 Project No. SUBTr18391 Completion Date 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. H. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations Roofing.material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. Grading SEE ATTACHED APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: J. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights -of -way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross -lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 20 total feet on Winchester Court 3. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 4. All existing easements lying within future rights -of -way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. K. Street Improvements All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT1 8391 StdCond 11-10.doc D2—Pg 74 Project No. SU BTT18391 Completion Date 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures, or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side- walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Winchester Court X I X X X X X n/a n/a n/a n/a Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. e. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. f. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. —I—l. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc D2—Pg 75 Project No. SUB1718391 Completion Date 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet —(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space spacing Size Qty. Winchester Pyrus kawakami Evergreen Pear 20 ft. 15 Gal 7 O.C. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of building permits. L. Public Maintenance Areas A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. M. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 3. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 4. Any catch basin in a sump condition shall be designed as two separate independent catch basins and provide for (2) Q100 intercepts for each to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. N. Improvement Completion If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required. —1-1— I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18391StdCond 11-10.doc D2—Pg 76 Project No. SUBTT18391 Completion Date O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water; gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVW D), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. P. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the f rst six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 3. Provide a copy of the Final Water Quality Management Plan with submittal of Grading Plans to Building and Safety. W QMP and Grading Plans are subject to review by the Building Official. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED —/—/. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2010 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18391 StdCond 11-10.doc D2—Pg 77 - City of Rancho Cucamonga „^? Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. ..` Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 GRADING COMMITTEE PROJECT REPORT & RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS SUBTT18391 Project No.: SUBTT18391 Type: 6-Lot Residential Subdivision Location: Winchester Court South of Wilson Street Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN: 0201-182-036, 037, 038 Meeting Date: September 14, 2010 By: Matthew Addington Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes: xxx No: If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: GRC: September 14, 2010 By: Matthew Addington FINAL: PC Meeting: November 10, 2010 B Note: Building and Safety — Grading will review and co me on future submittals for this project. A) STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and Safety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drainage Plans, 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3) A geologic report shallbe prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\SUBTT18391\SUBTT78391 Grading Committee Project Report to PC, 20101110.doc 1 of 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18391 Rm�i� Building & Safety Department ' 10500 Civic Center Dr. yRancho Cucamonga, 91T: (909) 477-2710 F: (90909) 477-77-2711 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8) A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 13) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 14) Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 15) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 17) This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 18) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 19) Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by I:\BUILDINGIPERMITSISUBTT183911SUBTT18391 Grading Committee Project Report to PC, 20101110.doc 2of4 _ City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTTIS391 Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: j) The bottom of the over -excavation ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 20) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. B) COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected / completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project for a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents, including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signatures. The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depending upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: 1) Please note that at this conceptual level a review of the accessibility access is not performed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to meet all accessibility requirements. 2) Please show the method of sewer service to each lot. 3) Section E-E shows the existing retaining wall south of the southerly property line of Lot 6 retaining a level backfill. This wall is owned and maintained by the adjacent property owner. Section E-E and the plan view proposes a 2:1 slope to be placed against this existing retaining wall. Please provide preliminary calculations showing I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\SUBTT18391\SUBT718391 Grading Committee Project Report to PC, 20101110.doc 3 of 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18391 y Building &Safety Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. s Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 > T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 the existing retaining wall may withstand the additional soil pressure of the proposed 2:1 slope without failing, or provide an alternate design along the south property line. C) SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1) Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit as part of the grading and drainage plan submittal package an updated topographic survey map showing the additional grading which was performed on the project site without permit(s). 2) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. 3) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4) Unpermitted grading activities have occurred on the subject parcel. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall include a topographic map of the subject parcel(s) showing the additional unpermitted earth placement. D) WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1) A Non -Category Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) was approved by the Engineering Department on August 27, 2007 I:\BUILDING\PERMITS\SUB7-r18391\SUBTT18391 Grading Committee Project Report to PC, 20101110.doc 4of4 ,� Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. tea- Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS October 27, 2010 Khan -Amin CTK, Inc. E/S of Winchester Rd. South of Wilson Ave. (6) SFR Subdivision SUBTT18391 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Fire ;hydrants shall be located in accordance with the 2007 California Fire Code, RCFPD Ordinance FD46 and RCFPD Standard 5-10 (formally 9-8). Submit plans to CVWD and FCS for review/ FSC-2 Fire Flow The required fire flow for this project is 2,000 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20- pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with 2007 Fire Code, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinance. FSC-9 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure in Standard #5-10. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of D2—Pg 82 the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #5-1 (formally 9-7). All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 3. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Public Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. 3. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 2 D2—Pg 83 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391 Public Review Period Closes: November 10, 2010 Project Name: Project Applicant: Kevin Richer Project Location (also see attached map): Located near the southeast corner of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court - APN: 0201-182-36, -37, and -38. Project Description: A request to subdivide a property comprised of 3 parcels into 6 parcels in the Low (L) Residential District. r9Rl01r<<c This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means thatan Environmental Impact Reportwill not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2760 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. i November 10, 2010 Date of Determination Adopted By RESOLUTION NO. 17-87 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00391, FORA PROPOSED DESIGN MODIFICATION FOR SIX (6) PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE ON THE EAST SIDE OF WINCHESTER COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0201-182-36. A. Recitals. 1. Feng Xiao Centerfiled an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2017-00391, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of October, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on October 11, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three (3) parcels with combined dimensions of approximately 659 feet north -to -south by approximately 178 feet east -to -west and an area of approximately 2.8 acres (122,000 square feet), located approximately 200 feet south of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court, on the east side of Winchester Court; and b. To the north, south, and west are single-family residences, while to the north there was a previously demolished single-family residence; and C. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District; and d. The project site previously contained a single -family residence, which was recently demolished. Vegetation on -site includes short grasses, shrubs and trees; and e. The subdivision of the project site into 6 lots (Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391) was approved by the Planning Commission on November 10, 2010. The previous design review application (Design Review DRC2013-00914) was approved by the Planning Commission on April 22, 2015; and D2—Pg 85 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-87 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00391 — FENG XIAO October 11, 2017 Page 2 f. The floor area of the houses (excluding garages) will range between 3,841 square feet (Lot 1) to 4,647 square feet (Lot 6); and g. The application proposes 5 distinct footprints; Unit 1 floor plan is used once on Lot 1, Unit 2 floor plan is used twice on Lots 2 and 4, Unit 3 floor plan is used twice on Lots 3 and 5 (Lot 5 is a reverse footprint), and Unit 4 floor plan is used once on Lot 6. The footprint on Lots 1 and 6 (Units 1 and 4) are each used once. The footprint for Lots 2 and 4 (Unit 2), and Lots 3 and 5 (Unit 3) are each used twice and have two separate elevations for each footprint. The resulting mix of building footprints and elevations is that no building elevation will be duplicated within the project; and h. Two (2) of the houses (Lots 1 and 6) will be one-story while the houses on the remainder of the lots (Lots 2, 3, 4, & 5) are two-story. This equates to thirty-three percent (33%) of the lots having single -story houses which will comply with Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code that requires a minimum of twenty-five percent (25%) of all single-family detached units within single-family residential development consisting of four (4) or more units to be single -story; and i. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code. Each house will have an articulated footprint/floor plan and profile with a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines; and j. There will be a single architectural theme that incorporates the form/massing and details derived from Italian and Mediterranean architecture; and k. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Winchester Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16421 but unfinished public right-of- way improvements — including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter - on the east side of the street are missing and will be completed as part of this project. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan. The proposal is to construct a residential subdivision with a density of 2 — 4 dwelling units per acre. The project site General Plan designation is Low Residential; and b. The proposed development is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct six (6) single-family residences within a six (6) lot subdivision. The project site land use district is Low (L) Residential; and C. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed land use is single-family residential, and is consistent with the single-family residential land uses within the vicinity of the project site and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding it is Low (L) Residential District; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-87 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00391 — FENG XIAO October 11, 2017 Page 3 d. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets the technical standards such as setbacks, lot coverage, building height, and the design standards that apply to architecture, use of materials, and massing/form, and the policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 10, 2010 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18391. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. The associated tentative tract map was for the purpose of developing the property with single-family residences. Therefore, the construction and operational characteristics of the project are as anticipated. The tentative tract map is substantially the same as was approved. There are no significant physical changes to the map such as the layout of the lots, grading, and fence/wall heights. Conditions on -site and on adjacent properties are generally the same as they were when the map was reviewed and approved. The site is surrounded by residential structures/uses and no significant new development has occurred in the general vicinity. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less -than -significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Design Review application subject to each and every condition set forth and in the attached Conditions of Approval. Planning Department 1) All applicable Conditions of Approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 10-51 for SUBTT18391 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. D2—Pg 87 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-87 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00391 — FENG XIAO October 11, 2017 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of October 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: W Aft RANCH QO)UCAMONGA Project #: DRC2017-00391 Project Name: 6 SFR /// WINCHESTER Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Location: 18391 SUBTT - 020118236-0000 Project Type: Design Review Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. The final location of the mailboxes shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber -to -the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Department and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 3. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 8. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. Printed: 10/2/2017 www.CityofRC.us Project #: DRC2017-00391 Project Name: 6 SFR /// WINCHESTER Location: 18391 SUBTT - 020118236-0000 Project Type: Design Review Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 12. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 13. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 14. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 15. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 16.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 17. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 18. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 19. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval - shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits, 20. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 21. For single-family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two 1/2-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 22. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 10/2/2017 www.CilyofRC.us Page 2 of 3 D2—Pg 90 Project #: DRC2017-00391 Project Name: 6 SFR /// WINCHESTER Location: Project Type: 18391 SU BTT - 020118236-0000 Review Modification ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Enter your special condition hereWhen the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required for new structures. Gradina Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. All grading and storm water quality conditions of approval for SUBTT18391 continue for this project. Printed: 10/2/2017 w .CityofRC.us D2—Pg 91 Page 3 of 3 •��,� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT • *���� DATE: October 11, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner) INITIATED BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2016-00999 - DUNKIN' DONUTS - The request to develop a drive-thru lane associated with the development of a 6,001- square foot multi -tenant commercial building on a vacant parcel of 0.95-acres in the General Commercial (GC) District, on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, about 500 feet east of Rochester Avenue, located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-023-10. Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00998, Minor Exception DRC2017-00424. The City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00998 - DUNKIN' DONUTS - The request to develop a 6,001-square foot multi -tenant commercial building on a vacant parcel of 0.95-acres in the General Commercial (GC) District, on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, about 500 feet east of Rochester Avenue, located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-023-10. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999, Minor Exception DRC2017-00424. The City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00424 - DUNKIN' DONUTS - A request to reduce the required setback from 45 feet to 40.5 feet for a drive-thru lane associated with the development of a 6,001-square foot multi -tenant commercial building on a vacant parcel of 0.95-acres in the General Commercial (GC) District, on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, about 500 feet east of Rochester Avenue, located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-023-10. Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00998, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999. The City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. D3-DSPgt PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00998, DRC2016-00999, AND DRC2017-00424 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999, Design Review DRC2016-00998, and Minor Exception DRC2017-00424 through adoption of the attached Resolutions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located approximately 500 feet east of Rochester Avenue (Exhibits A & B). This project site is within a commercial/office center of about 188,000 square feet that currently consists of 5 pad buildings and an office building of 39,400 square feet. The Master Plan for this center was approved by the Planning Commission on January 24, 2007 (Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17594 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01084). The project site is the last undeveloped parcel within that commercial/office center. The parcel is irregularly shaped with a Foothill Boulevard street frontage of 114 feet, an overall lot depth of 266 feet north -to -south and an overall lot width of 575 feet east -to -west. The building pad is currently vacant; however, the adjacent building pads and parking lot are fully developed. The existing land uses and General Plan land use and zoning designations for the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: .... Zoriing,.,,..: General Commercial (GC) Site Vacant General Commercial District North Commercial Center Community Commercial Community Commercial with Hotel CC District General Commercial (GC) South Vacant General Commercial District East Bakers Restaurant, General Commercial General Commercial (GC) with Drive-Thru District General Commercial (GC) West Sprint Store General Commercial District ANALYSIS: A. Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999: Development Code Table 17.30.090-1 establishes that Drive -In and Drive -Through Sales and Service land uses are permitted in the General Commercial (GC) District, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The primary factors of consideration in the review of a Conditional Use Permit are use compatibility and availability of parking. The proposed drive-thru use is located in a commercial center with one drive-in land use (e.g., American Tire Depot) located west of the project site and two adjacent drive-thru land uses (e.g., Baker's Restaurant and Comerica Bank) located immediately east of the project site. The commercial building immediately west of the project site (e.g., Sprint Store) is a non-drive-thru land use. Because of the design of the proposed project relative to the location of existing uses, the proposed project provides sufficient stacking for the proposed drive-thru aisle that will not negatively impact adjacent drive-in, drive-thru, or non-drive-thru land uses, there are no known land use compatibility issues. Additionally, the parking analysis, shown below, demonstrates that there is sufficient parking on site for the proposed land uses associated with the proposed project. D3—DSPg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00998, DRC2016-00999, AND DRC2017-00424— DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 3 Design Review DRC2016-00998: The applicant proposes to construct a multi -tenant commercial building of 6,001 square feet, consisting of a 1,927-square foot Dunkin' Donuts drive-thru, and two additional tenant spaces at 1,740 and 2,233 square feet (Exhibit C). The architectural style of the building is that of a contemporary commercial structure utilizing common materials and finishes. The exterior of the building is proposed to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone veneer that make up most of the material used on the building. The building fagade incorporates a variety of materials, including stucco, fiber cement lap siding, stone, glass store front windows, and aluminum awnings (Exhibit F). The building utilizes the same type of materials and finishes that are on the existing buildings within the commercial complex, but does not duplicate the styles of those existing buildings, which varies. The building itself consists of visually -interesting fagades which meet the City's 360-degree design standards. The design incorporates tower elements to break up the wall plane, and recessed portions of the wall plane to add visual interest, that along with the variety of building materials provides a visually appealing building. The proposed building will be centrally located on the building pad and will be situated in - line consistent with existing buildings to the east and west. A drive-thru lane will enter east of the building, proceed around the north side of the building, and then exit on the westerly side of the building providing drive-thru access for the most westerly tenant (Dunkin' Donuts). Landscaping is provided on the north, east, and west sides of the building and will complement the existing landscaping for the complex. The drive-thru lane will be screened from Foothill Boulevard through a combination of existing and proposed landscaping, berming, and a change in grade as the drive-thru lane is approximately 6 feet lower than Foothill Boulevard. C. Parking Calculations: The overall master planned project was designed to provide a total of 398 parking spaces based on a summation of anticipated office and restaurant uses. A total of 119 parking spaces are dedicated for the subject parcel. Adequate parking is provided for all of the proposed restaurant (Dunkin' Donuts) and the other unspecified tenant (whether they are restaurants or general retail). The parking requirements for the project are established in the Development Code, Chapter 17.64 and are as shown below: Type ofrUse Square Parking Number of 'Numbef,of-., Footage1. ` Ratio . Spaces Spaces, r.. Required Provided _ :,_ Restaurant, w/Drive-Thru 1,927 1/100 20 Restaurant (2 Tenants) 1/100 50 OR 4,903 General Retail 2 Tenants 11250 6,830 70 or 40 119 D. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): The proposed building will have a floor area of 6,001 square feet. The project site has an area of approximately 59,754 square feet. The FAR for the project site is ten percent (10%). Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan of the General Plan, the maximum FAR in the General Commercial land use category is thirty-five percent (35%). E. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Oaxaca, and Granger) on September 19, 2017 (Exhibit G). The Committee D3—D5 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00998, DRC2016-00999, AND DRC2017-00424 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 4 approved the project as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. Technical Review Committee: As the subject application does not propose any revisions to the previously approved tentative parcel map, on -site grading is substantially the same with only minor adjustments for the drive-thru lane, and the required public improvements have already been constructed, Staff determined that review by this Committee was not necessary. G. Minor Exception DRC2017-00424: The project also includes an application for a 4.5-foot reduction in the 45-foot drive-thru setback off of Foothill Boulevard. Development Code Chapter 17.90 regulates Drive -In and Drive -Through Uses. Table 17.90.030-1 establishes a 45-foot minimum setback from the ultimate face of curb for parking and the drive-thru lane. Development Code Chapter 17.64.110 establishes Minor Exception provisions and Table 17.16.110-1 establishes that a Minor Exception may provide for a ten percent (10%) reduction in the setback requirement. The applicant submitted a Minor Exception application because of physical site constraints, consistency with established development patterns within the project site, and grade differences between the existing Foothill Boulevard and the proposed drive-thru lane. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code. Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Fact: The proposed setback reduction will allow for the development of the project site consistent with existing developments to the east. Due to the location of existing utility improvements located along the south boundary of the building pad, the proposed building cannot be shifted further to the south. Providing a minimum tenant space square footage required shifting the northerly side of the building to the north, which ultimately moved the drive-thru aisle into the required drive-thru setback. The setback reduction will allow for the development of the site that meets all other applicable General Plan and Development Code requirements and land use policies for commercial development and is consistent with the existing drive-thru locations for the two drive-thru commercial developments east of the proposed project. Finding: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Fact: The proposed project and request for a setback reduction for the drive-thru lane is compatible with the surrounding land uses in the General Commercial (GC) District, which permits the development of commercial structures. The setback reduction is compatible with the development of three buildings in the immediate vicinity of the project site, which were developed prior to the establishment of the current setback requirement. The American Tire Depot structure west of the project site is situated approximately 42 feet from the Foothill Boulevard face -of -curb, the Baker's Restaurant drive-thru immediately east of the project site is situated approximately 25 feet from the Foothill Boulevard face -of -curb, and the Comerica Bank drive-thru, east of the project site, is situated approximately 38 feet from the Foothill Boulevard face -of -curb. D3—D5 Pg4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00998, DRC2016-00999, AND DRC2017-00424 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 5 Finding: The proposed exception to the specific development standard is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Fact: There are existing physical constraints that preclude shifting the building to avoid necessitating a Minor Exception for a setback reduction. There is an existing utility easement south of the building pad that prohibits the building from shifting to the south, and there is an approximate 6-foot grade difference between Foothill Boulevard and the project site. Landscaping provided on the north, east, and west sides of the building will complement the existing landscaping for the complex, and the drive-thru lane will be screened from Foothill Boulevard thru a combination of existing and proposed landscaping, berming, and the 6-foot grade change. Finding: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact: The approval of a Minor Exception is appropriate for proposed setback reduction as it increases the functionality of the project site, and will not be perceptible due to the 6-foot grade difference between Foothill Boulevard and the project site. Further, there are existing physical constraints, such as an existing utility easement, that preclude shifting the building to avoid necessitating a Minor Exception for a setback reduction. Additionally, the proposed drive-thru will be of comparable distance from the Foothill Boulevard curb as similar drive- thrus within the commercial center. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2005-01084. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated the proposed Design Review application and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The original submittal considered impacts associated with a retail center and the current proposal is for a retail use. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. D3—D5Pg5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00998, DRC2016-00999, AND DRC2017-00424— DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 6 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and ,the objectives of the Development Code. Commercial development of the site is consistent with the land use designations in the General Plan and Zoning map. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax, a percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. When completed, the overall project will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The developers also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees applicable to the projects. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the overall project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, and police. The overall project, during construction may increase construction -related employment and, following its completion, will increase employment due to new non-residential (e.g. retail) uses, and may increase employment at surrounding existing and future businesses that will provide services to the employees and customers of the project. Also, a positive fiscal impact for the City will occur through increased sales tax revenue generated by these employees' and customers' patronage of local businesses. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A — DRC2016-00998 Vicinity Map Exhibit B — Site Utilization Map Exhibit C — Site Plan Exhibit D — Grading Plan Exhibit E — Landscape Plan Exhibit F — Architectural Plans (Floorplan, Roof Plan, Building Elevations) Exhibit G — Design Review Committee Action Agenda for September 19, 2017 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit Design Review DRC2016-00999 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2016-00998 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2017-00424 CB:TG/Is D3—D5 Pg6 Vicinity Map Design Review DRC2016=00998 d L Base Line 8th Project Site Church Church Foothill WAN W > %_ 0 6th� m 6th L N RS 4th ¢ — 4th Line * City Hall EXHIBIT A D3—D5 Pg7 !® EXHIBIT B .....�...�.... \)~ /`| , kv [u°� :»+� /j ;$■� � � � G� � � � §[ !: ( \ R � ®Uljluh NHId 311S AWNIWIl3Nd VO bONOWV000OH0NVy 831S3HOOdV ITH 1003 ASV08N8VO..-0l M369 HM3 00 L...._iS.-1 —4 EXHIBIT C D3-D5Pg9 au JyIIM s t�eC q��pt �y3 ;oPTy= �li3�d�eyi5:s`eeEe3�t�¢?3i 148`.[ IAIMbibi � y � ? � O FOOT UBOIREYA_RO - 22J 62 O m� Up Z 211r 06 W m U LLm O� O O ZQ m ZO m Qo O S > O � U s� r .p i� S � w •dl l//O <6 II yr p i gg33 gg dig ° ep� f v5 i5', � s .r T � i v i _I 9' �- ° r . - °�•pz _,�J—r3----- _ _ _—__ _ kY s• ______ __________________ -________� ___________�J___ ' r_______ _______ �_____________ - \ �r _ � m is °• ------- ___________________________________________ ______k------ _--------------- Z ----------------------- EXHIBIT D D3-D5 Pg10 F" W sai iii �o I R ;la a o I I II 1)U 0 EXHIBIT E I C2 s¢9 1 � OO; OI OON� I .i2; yyO �jjj {11 I D3-D5Pg11 v a �11 O NVId 21001d A2iVNIWI13TJd o Q tlO V'R O08TI11 H OOJ � I° � �y%yI� v „°v i131S3HO0tl 8'111H 100d ilB:i.�1! :emu aiw . SVONJIiatlO.-0'L M3tl8 HS3tlj OO EXHIBIT F D3—D5Pg12 8a6mN Od i I i,ii59ii� a« w° s„ms.,naai+s NVld d00b k*dVN1VM93 ld "o UUU CC3c3 $�a�e iiili�{ �x voHOOvT111HOOJ i;I:i:l�l ".•"` �Y° " xaisuae �;�11tl°"��" "SVOMMNtlVO.-03M9tiSH 3Hj OO G a�. i; i i 5 3 a 3f i E .y i1 lit g it r, a a z na e D3—D5 Pg13 Iu�� !ip9ii ''e �lp..d�iai6drid�'ip:fqli��ii�lil� a � 'T �xO1�•". w3°ON •3ov8 �M Nv�VNIao, w0r1�1 roM3oMaH�HrsUna aaeaaSNOIlVA3l3 801831X3 LID C� plu]np`411„ AT Q j"' aa. I I I 9 IJ 6 6 [ k y tl 3 Q a1 i92 W 4 l� �,. €; z }Ll z ul r, ul 1Tx �ay / ze - r J q 4 if 55 Z, LU O y P • It C _ �\ _Ze � of 1as, 3 <, - d •d ? e JJJkdcp:, a O}� t• i1 Q i0' 6[ z� IN a3 �`LL n 3! Cull a m pp ds. 9 / 3p d } F a D3—D5Pg14 |��� )$ \ ` _IIVA213 ©H3i)(3 , . � �: o < §. \ - ~ \ � - » � � § : Q .- . )bonny /\7 �\\\§, m-Ses SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly X 7:00 P Al Rich Macias Candyce Burnett Donald Granger X Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present: Dominick Perez, Associate Planner and Tom Grahn, Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. C1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19823 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to subdivide one (1) existing parcel into three (3) parcels in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings on a 13.96-acre site within the EXHIBIT G Page 1 of 3 D3—D5 Pg16 SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Industrial Park (IP) District located at the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica Avenue — APN: 0210-081-43. Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00402 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to construct an industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District — APN: 0210-081-43. Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016-00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408, Uniform Sign Program DRC2017-00404 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2017-00404 - CP LOGISTICS UTICA, LLC - A proposal to establish a Uniform Sign Program related to a proposed industrial development consisting of three (3) industrial logistics buildings with a combined floor area of 293,283 square feet on a parcel of about 13.96 acres, located at the northwest corner of Utica Avenue and 4th Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District —APN: 0210-081-43. Related Files: Pre-App Review DRC2016- 00826, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19823, Design Review DRC2017-00402, Minor Exception DRC2017-00406, Minor Exception DRC2017-00408 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2017-00405. The Committee approved as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. C2. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00998 - DUNKIN' DONUTS - The request to develop a 6,001 square foot multi -tenant commercial building on a vacant parcel of 0.95-acre in the General Commercial (GC) District, on the south side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 500 feet east of Rochester Avenue, located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0229-023-10. Related files: Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999, Minor Exception DRC2017-00424. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. The Committee approved as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. D. ADJOURNMENT 7:34 P.M. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. Page 2 of 3 D3—D5 Pg17 SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist 11 with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, September 7, 2017, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 3 of 3 D3—D5 Pg18 RESOLUTION NO. 17-88 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2016-00999, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A DRIVE- THRU LANE ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 6,001- SQUARE FOOT MULTI -TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 0.95-ACRES IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, ABOUT 500 FEET EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, LOCATED AT 11995 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0229-023-10. A. Recitals. 1. Dunkin' Donuts filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of October, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on October 11, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard. The parcel is irregularly shaped with a Foothill Boulevard street frontage of 114 feet, an overall lot depth of 266 feet north -to -south and an overall lot width of 575 feet east -to -west. The building pad is currently vacant; however, the adjacent building pads and parking lot are fully developed; and b. The property to the north of the subject site contains a commercial center, the property to the south is vacant, the property to the east contains a drive-thru restaurant, and the property to the west contains a commercial building; and C. The project site is located within the General Commercial (GC) District; and d. The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the General Commercial District, including building setback, building height, required parking, and landscaping; and D3—D5 Pg19 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-88 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2016-00999 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 2 e. The proposed building will have a floor area of 6,001 square feet. The project site has an area of approximately 59,754 square feet. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the project site is compliant with the Development Code at ten percent (10%); and f. The architectural style of the building is that of a contemporary commercial structure utilizing common materials and finishes. The exterior of the building is proposed to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone veneer that makes up most of the material used on the building. The building facade incorporates a variety of materials, including stucco, fiber cement lap siding, stone, glass store front windows, and aluminum awnings that are compatible with the existing buildings in the complex. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The underlying land use designation is General Commercial. The General Plan states that the General Commercial land use designation permits a wide range of commercial development activities. The development of a proposed 6,001 square foot multi -tenant building with a drive-thru lane is contemplated and is below the maximum FAR of 35 percent specified within the General Plan; and b. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The development of a drive-thru and the potential land uses that could be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses in the vicinity of the project site. The subject property, as well as the properties in the east, west, and south, are all in the General Commercial (GC) District, and operation of the proposed project will comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal requirements; and C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed project is designed to comply with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including, but not limited to, building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio, building height, parking, screening, landscape coverage, and architecture. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously D3—D5 Pg20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-88 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2016-00999 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 3 considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The original submittal considered impacts associated with a retail center and the current proposal is for a retail use. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00999. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) All Conditions of Approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-89 for DRC2016-00998, shall apply. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7'll ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of October 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: D3—D5 Pg21 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-88 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2016-00999 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D3—D5 Pg22 Conditions of Approval CuRAN CAMnNON Community Development Department Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR H/ Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 5. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 6. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 8. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 9. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 10. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 11. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Printed 10/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us D3-D5 Pg23 Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 13. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 14. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 15. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 16. The applicant shall , be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 17. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 18. For non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 19. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 20. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. Printetl: 10/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us -Page 2 of 10 D3—D5 Pg24 Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 22. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 23. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 24. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. Engineerinq Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Applicant shall pay a fair -share contribution for improvements at the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard at Foothill Boulevard based on the traffic impact analysis. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior the issuance of a Building Permit. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 4. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 5. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. w .CityofRC.us Printed: 10/3/2017 Page 3 of 10 D3—D5 Pg25 Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: Project Type: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Desian Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. This new structures is not required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance but it will be limited on it's use and may require fire walls to separate occupancies; assembly occupancies will definitely be limited in occupant load and square footage, furniture stores are limited to 2500 sq. ft. in non sprinklered buildings (Local Ordinance). Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. Printed: 10/3/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 10 D3—D5 Pg26 Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR N Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 7. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 10. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. w .CityofRC.us Printed: 10/3/2017 Page 5 of 10 D3—D5 Pg27 Project#: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: Project Type: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 13. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 16. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 17. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 18. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 19. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 20. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 21. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. w .CityolRC.us Printed: 10/3/2017 Page 6 of 10 D3—D5 Pg28 Project#: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: Project Type: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 22. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 23. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 24. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 25. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section` VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 26. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 27. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. Printed: 10/3/2017 w .CilyofRC.us Page 7 of 10 D3—D5 Pg29 Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR N Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 29. Section 1.5.1, Table 1-1 Priority Projects, Category No. 1, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans reads "All significant re -development projects — defined as the addition or replacement of 5,000 or more square feet (sq. ft.) of impervious surface on an already developed site subject to discretionary approval of the permitting jurisdiction. In addition: Where re -development results in an increase of 50% or more of the impervious surfaces of a previously existing developed site, the numeric sizing criteria discussed in Section 4 applies to the entire development. The project is showing 4,329 square feet of existing impervious area. The project is showing 2,969 square feet of proposed and/or removal and replacement of impervious area. The proposed/removal/replacement impervious area equals or exceeds 50% of the existing impervious area, the project is conditioned, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, to prepare .a final project -specific water quality management plan to treat the storm water runoff of the entire development's impervious area. Printed: 10/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 8 of 10 D3—D5 Pg30 Projeci x: DR02016-00998 DRC20 i d-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 30. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 5.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 5.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). Printed: 10/0/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 10 D3—D5 Pg31 Project #: DRC2016-00995 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: Project Type: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed: 10/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 10 of 10 D3—D5 Pg32 RESOLUTION NO. 17-89 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW NO. DRC2016-00998, A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 6,001-SQUARE FOOT MULTI -TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 0.95-ACRES IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, ABOUT 500 FEET EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, LOCATED AT 11995 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0229-023-10. A. Recitals. 1. Dunkin' Donuts filed an application for the approval of Design Review No. DRC2016- 00998, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of October, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on October 11, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard. The parcel is irregularly shaped with a Foothill Boulevard street frontage of 114 feet, an overall lot depth of 266 feet north -to -south and an overall lot width of 575 feet east -to -west. The building pad is currently vacant; however, the adjacent building pads and parking lot are fully developed; and b. The property to the north of the subject site contains a commercial center, the property to the south is vacant, the property to the east contains a drive-thru restaurant, and the property to the west contains a commercial building; and C. The project site is located within the General Commercial (GC) District; and d. The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the General Commercial District, including building setback, building height, required parking, and landscaping; and D3—D5 Pg33 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-89 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00998 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 2 e. The proposed building will have a floor area of 6,001 square feet. The project site has an area of approximately 59,754 square feet. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the project site is is compliant with the Development Code at ten percent (10%); and f. The architectural style of the building is that of a contemporary commercial structure utilizing common materials and finishes. The exterior of the building is proposed to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone veneer that makes up most of the material used on the building. The building fagade incorporates a variety of materials, including stucco, fiber cement lap siding, stone, glass store front windows, and aluminum awnings that are compatible with the existing buildings in the complex. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The underlying land use designation is General Commercial. The General Plan establishes that the General Commercial land use designation permits a wide range of commercial development activities. The development of a proposed 6,001 square foot multi -tenant building with a drive-thru lane is contemplated and is below the maximum FAR of 35 percent specified within the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The development and design of a 6,001- square foot multi -tenant commercial building with a drive-thru is based on Development Code standards and is a permitted land use in the General Commercial (GC) District; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed project is designed to comply with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including, but not limited to, building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio, building height, parking, screening, landscape coverage, and architecture; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The development of a drive-thru and the potential land uses that could be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses in the vicinity of the project site. The subject property, as well as the properties in the east, west, and south, are all in the General Commercial (GC) District, and operation of the proposed project will comply with all applicable local, State, and Federal requirements. , 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. Pursuant to CEQA D3—D5 Pg34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-89 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00998 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 3 Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Design Review DRC2016- 00998, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The original submittal considered impacts associated with a retail center and the current proposal is for a retail use. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Design Review DRC2016-00998. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the Design Review application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MW Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of October 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: D3—D5 Pg35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-89 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00998 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D3—D5 Pg36 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR N Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 5. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 6. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 8. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 9. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 10. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 11. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. �.CityofRC.us Pnmed: 10i3/2017 D3—D5 Pg37 Project -: DRC2016-00993 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR N Dunkin' Donuts Location: Project Type: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 13. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 14. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 15. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 16. The applicant shall , be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 17. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 18. For non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 19. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 20. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. Printed: 10/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 2 of 10 D3—D5 Pg38 Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24-inch box or larger. 22. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 23. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 24. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Applicant shall pay a fair -share contribution for improvements at the intersection of Day Creek Boulevard at Foothill Boulevard based on the traffic impact analysis. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior the issuance of a Building Permit. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 4. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 5. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. w .CityofRC.us Printed: 10/312017 Page 3 of 10 D3—D5 Pg39 Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC20 i 6-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completedCD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 7. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. This new structures is not required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance but it will be limited on it's use and may require fire walls to separate occupancies; assembly occupancies will definitely be limited in occupant load and square footage, furniture stores are limited to 2500 sq. ft. in non sprinklered buildings (Local Ordinance). Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. www.CityolRC.us Page 4 of 10 Printed: 10/3/2017 9 D3—D5Pg40 Project #: DRC2016-00998 DRC2016-00999 Project Name: DR N Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 7. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 10. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. w .CilyofRC.us Printed: 10/3/2017 Page 5 of 10 D3—D5 Pg41 Project 4. DRC2016-00998 DRC20'16-00999 Project Name: DR H/ Dunkin' Donuts Location: Project Type: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 13. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 14. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 16. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 17. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorders Office. 18. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 19. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 20. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 21. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. Pnnted: 10/3/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 6 of 10 D3—D5 Pg42 rrolec,i:: DFC'2u16-009�6DRC20i6-00399 Project Name: DR N Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 22. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 23. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 24. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 25. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 26. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 27. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. vMnv.CityofRC.us Printed: 10/3/2017 Page 7 of 10 D3—D5 Pg43 r rojectr, DFG2016-OrlJ98D;;C2013-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 28. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 29. Section 1.5.1, Table 1-1 Priority Projects, Category No. 1, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans reads "All significant re -development projects — defined as the addition or replacement of 5,000 or more square feet (sq. ft.) of impervious surface on an already developed site subject to discretionary approval of the permitting jurisdiction. In addition: Where re -development results in an increase of 50% or more of the impervious surfaces of a previously existing developed site, the numeric sizing criteria discussed in Section 4 applies to the entire development. The project is showing 4,329 square feet of existing impervious area. The project is showing 2,969 square feet of proposed and/or removal and replacement of impervious area. The proposed/removal/replacement impervious area equals or exceeds 50% of the existing impervious area, the project is conditioned, prior to the issuance of a grading permit, to prepare a final project -specific water quality management plan to treat the storm water runoff of the entire development's impervious area. Printed: 10/W2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 10 D3—D5 Pg44 i IU�Jil .i. L.�i. �UI O-:�Ij;��U L�I'L.LU IG-rl�c)dJ Project Name: DR N Dunkin' Donuts Location: Project Type: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. - Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 30. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 5.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 5.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. I. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). wewi.CityofRC.us _ Printed: 10/3/2017 Page 9 or 10 D3—D5 Pg45 Projaci DRC20I5-GG993D,RO2010-00999 Project Name: DR /// Dunkin' Donuts Location: 11995 FOOTHILL BLVD - 022902310-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". v,Mnv.CityofRc.us Pageiooflo Panted: 10/3/2017 D3—D5Pg46 RESOLUTION NO. 17-90 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00424 A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED SETBACK FROM 45 FEET TO 40.5 FEET FOR A DRIVE- THRU LANE ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 6,001- SQUARE FOOT MULTI -TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON A VACANT PARCEL OF 0.95-ACRES IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, ABOUT 500 FEET EAST OF ROCHESTER AVENUE, LOCATED AT 11995 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0229-023-10. A. Recitals. 1. Dunkin' Donuts filed an application for the issuance of Minor Exception DRC2017- 00424 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of October, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on October 11, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 11995 Foothill Boulevard. The parcel is irregularly shaped with a Foothill Boulevard street frontage of 1.14 feet, an overall lot depth of 266 feet north -to -south and an overall lot width of 575 feet east -to -west. The building pad is currently vacant; however, the adjacent building pads and parking lot are fully developed; and b. The property to the north of the subject site contains a commercial center, the property to the south is vacant, the property to the east contains a drive -through restaurant, and the property to the west contains a commercial building; and C. The project site is located within the General Commercial (GC) District; and D3—D5 Pg47 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-90 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00424 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 2 d. The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the General Commercial District, including building setback, building height, required parking, and landscaping; and e. The proposed building will have a floor area of 6,001 square feet. The project site has an area of approximately 59,754 square feet. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the project site is compliant with the Development Code at ten percent (10%); and f. The architectural style of the building is that of a contemporary commercial structure utilizing common materials and finishes. The exterior of the building is proposed to use a mixture of earth tone colored stucco and stone veneer that makes up most of the material used on the building. The building fagade incorporates a variety of materials, including stucco, fiber cement lap siding, stone, glass store front windows, and aluminum awnings that are compatible with the existing buildings in the complex. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed setback reduction will allow for the development of the project site consistent with existing developments to the east. Because of the location of existing utility improvements located along the south boundary of the building pad, the proposed building cannot be shifted further to the south. Providing a minimum tenant space square footage required shifting the northerly side of the building to the north, which ultimately moved the drive-thru aisle into the required drive-thru setback. The setback reduction will allow for the development of the site that meets all other applicable General Plan and Development Code requirements and land use policies for commercial development and is consistent with the existing drive-thru locations for the two drive-thru commercial developments east of the proposed project; and b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed project and request for a setback reduction for the drive- thru lane is compatible with the surrounding land uses in the General Commercial (GC) District, which permits the development of commercial structures. The setback reduction is compatible with the development of three buildings in the immediate vicinity of the project site, which were developed prior to the establishment of the current setback requirement. The American Tire Depot structure west of the project site is situated approximately 42 feet from the Foothill Boulevard face -of -curb, the Baker's Restaurant drive-thru immediately east of the project site is situated approximately 25 feet from the Foothill Boulevard face -of -curb, and the Comerica Bank drive-thru, east of the project site, is situated approximately 38 feet from the Foothill Boulevard face -of -curb; and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. There are existing physical constraints that preclude shifting the building to avoid necessitating a Minor Exception for a setback reduction. There is an existing utility easement south of the building pad that prohibits the building from shifting to the south, and there is an approximate 6-foot grade difference between Foothill Boulevard and the project site. Landscaping provided on the north, east, and west sides of the building will D3—D5Pg48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-90 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00424 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 3 complement the existing landscaping for the complex, and the drive-thru lane will be screened from Foothill Boulevard through a combination of existing and proposed landscaping, berming, and the 6-foot grade change; and d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. The approval of a Minor Exception is appropriate for proposed setback reduction as it increases the functionality of the project site, and will not be perceptible due to the 6-foot grade difference between Foothill Boulevard and the project site. Further, there are existing physical constraints, such as an existing utility easement, that preclude shifting the building to avoid necessitating a Minor Exception for a setback reduction. Additionally, the proposed drive- thru will be of comparable distance from the Foothill Boulevard curb as similar drive-thrus within the commercial center. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on January 24, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM17818. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the DRC2017-00424, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The original submittal considered impacts associated with a retail center and the current proposal is for a retail use. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of DRC2017-00424. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. D3—D5 Pg49 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-90 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2017-00424 — DUNKIN' DONUTS October 11, 2017 Page 4 Planning Department 1) All Conditions of Approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 17-89 for DRC2016-00998, shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of October 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: D3—D5 Pg50 STAFF REPORT DATE: October 11. 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner 'r K INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 - MANNING HOMES - A request for site plan and architectural review of 16 single-family residences on 6.59-acres of land within the Low (L) District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan on the south side of Carnesi Drive and east of Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0227-061-03 and 82. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2013-00961, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2013-00962, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936, Variance DRC2014-00219 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00113. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 21, 2015, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve Design Review DRC2017-00378 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. 7[ �12 C T9PPI131 On August 12, 2015, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936, for the subdivision of the 6.59 acre project site into 16 single-family lots, Variance DRC2014-00217, for wall heights up to 11 feet, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014-00113, for the removal of up to 50 trees. The Planning Commission also recommended City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2013-00961 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2013-00962, to change the General Plan land use and Etiwanda Specific Plan zoning designations from Very Low (VL) District to Low (L) District. On October 21, 2015, the City Council approved General Plan Amendment DRC2013-00961 and Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2013-00962. On August 3, 2016, the City Council approved the final subdivision map. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Site Characteristics: The project site is vacant and approximately 670 feet from north to south and 400 feet east to west. The existing grade elevation is approximately 1,390 feet along the north property line and 1,370 feet along the south property line, for a total grade change of D6-Pg 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 — CARNESI, LLC. (MANNING HOMES) October 11, 2017 Page 2 approximately 20 feet. The site has been regularly cleared of vegetation and the on -site trees have been removed for the proposed development. The existing land uses, General Plan land use and zoning designations for the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low (L) Residential Low (L) Residential District* North Single -Family Residences Very Low (VL) Residential Very Low (VL) Residential District* South Church Very Low (VL) Residential Low (L) Residential District* East Single -Family Residences Low (L) Residential Low (L) Residential District* West Single -Family Residences Very Low (VL) Residential I Very Low (VL) Residential I and Church District* 'Theseproperties are within the Etiwanda Specific Plan ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is requesting approval for Design Review for 16 residences on the approved 16 lot tract (SUBTT18936). The project complies with all of the development requirements for the Low (L) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, with the prior approval of a Variance (DRC2014-0021), allowing walls up to 11 feet in height. Building setbacks, height limitations and lot coverage requirements comply with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Lot coverage on 6 lots (Lots 6, 7, 10, 12, 14 and 16), though, are between 29 and 30 percent, at orjust below the 30 percent maximum permitted lot coverage. Lot 12, due to being at the maximum lot coverage, does not include the covered rear porch which is a standard feature on the other single -story plans. The applicant has included a detached patio with a retractable sunshade on Lot 12, which is not required to be included in the total lot coverage. B. Architecture: The Development Code requires that projects with 11 — 20 units provide 4 different floor plans and 3 elevations per floor plan. Reverse footprints are counted as a separate floor plan. The project includes reverse floor plans for each floor plan for a total of 6 different floor plans and 3 elevations for Plans 1 and 3, and 2 elevations for Plan 2, exceeding the minimum requirement. The Development Code also requires that projects consisting of 4 or more units include a minimum of 25 percent single -story plans. The project includes 4 single -story plans, in compliance with the minimum requirement. Three (3) separate floor plans are proposed, along with 3 different elevations for Plans 1 and 3 (Spanish, Tuscan and California Ranch) and 2 different elevations for Plan 2 (Spanish and Tuscan). Plan #1 is single -story and includes 3,640 square feet of living area, a 701-square foot garage, a 217-square foot rear porch and 128-square foot front porch. Plan #2 is two-story and includes 4,394 square feet of living area, a 829-square foot garage, a 208-square foot rear porch and a 159-square foot front porch. Plan #3 is two-story and includes 4,546 square feet of living area, a 923-square foot garage, a 210-square foot rear patio and a 184-square foot front patio. Each floor plan and architectural variation includes wall and roof plane articulation and carries the architectural design theme to each elevation (360 degree architecture). Each D6—Pg 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 — CARNESI, LLC. (MANNING HOMES) October 11, 2017 Page 3 plan includes design elements that emphasize the chosen architectural style including the use of stone veneer, exposed raftertails, architecturally correct window and door surrounds, window shutters, wrought iron accents and tile roofs. The plans also include the use of decorative garage and front entry doors that emphasize the architectural style. C. Neighborhood Meeting: On July 19, 2017, a neighborhood meeting was conducted by the applicant at Etiwanda Intermediate School, at 6925 Etiwanda Avenue. The intent of the meeting was to provide the property owners living within a 660-foot radius of the project boundaries an opportunity to review the project and have any questions or concerns addressed by the applicant. The applicant provided an overview of the project to the 12 residents in attendance and fielded their questions. Concerns were raised about vehicle traffic along Etiwanda Avenue and Carnesi Drive, construction noise and the project timeline and pricing. The applicant informed the residents that the project would contribute minimal traffic to the existing roadway system. Traffic noise and construction times would comply with City standards. The project would take approximately one year to complete and pricing would be determined upon completion of the units. The residents made positive comments about the proposed architecture and site design, but remained concerned about traffic. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Macias, and Granger) reviewed the project on September 5, 2017 (Exhibit F). The Committee accepted the proposal as submitted. E. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed and approved the project as presented on September 5, 2017. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 21, 2015, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Design Review DRC2017-00378 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The proposed project involves the Design Review for 16 single-family residences on a previously approved 16 lot tract map. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The proposed project is consistent with the previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936 for a 16-lot residential subdivision as the project consists of the Design Review for 16 single-family residences and does not raise or create environmental impacts that were not previously considered. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, D6—Pg 3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 — CARNESI, LLC. (MANNING HOMES) October 11, 2017 Page 4 staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the Design Review DRC2017-00378. Furthermore, all mitigation measures in the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration will be implemented with the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. Additionally, the project will create temporary construction related jobs during the development of the site. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. For example, the Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages the facilitation of sustainable and attractive infill development that compliments surrounding neighborhoods. This proposed residential project will complement the surrounding neighborhood as it is compatible with the adjacent homes. Furthermore, the land use is in compliance with the Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received in response to the public hearing notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Detailed Site Plan Exhibit C - Grading Plan/Tentative Tract Map 18936 Exhibit D - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit E - Elevation, Floor, and Roof Plans Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Comments (September 5, 2017) Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2017-00378 CB:TV/jy Sam ,•illl a �� ° �i y Ys :E � ? j n� i n l' �'�e �� --• `L� Sf YY$ ➢ S _i1p I$ S� ? -aa, k �� j 5. gYS Yi a-�r5 .SI Y!. YSJ.o k a Y ,ley EXHIBIT A ,71 ,j PI PI I 4 tN ad I I I E 3s d2 ]6i ]iti IN; i iU ili aii; di€ I Ei? sl F rs�Nf 4 Y9 1 Pt— i€ ar �I fl II n f d xS 'Irl III rlla i . 06.� kV fi � I�,_ 03 all 44 I s Il> sg a li' vR J . •3� Ig I i. aa+lrl. Kill x o 7v I I Yaa - I I I I rl 6g z I ------------I -- — — — — -- ___ _ 30N3ntl Vn-- ' s o a a .3113 r � m55W U W � � O a U 5 IW � n I I 5 I 4 .I r I tee I , I I I "a V u' I r i� �wJ a I EXHIBIT C I I� YA �Q �• • _ 4 ? \: '� ➢a �' � k I ; ` F d; 1 E `ypy� a:ii a. Fi �2 q 4 Y yy �4 as 4f>yr. ILL kc �Il i {w' I 1\• I ill III. 1i 3 I 1.4 d CSi al I, I yiR '3 I 11 a` �yl NVld 3d:3 .H9N INNVW _ AtlVNlllnl .m•. i..,. a_ Rn(2 fi SJISSV'IJ VQNVMIH -" - '�P EXHIBIT D D6-Pg10 Ntlld 9N11Ntlld : N N N v el SL'>l'S SlOI � soave iNoad ltlolaei II a.. 11 1) VQNdth1I13 C� J D6-Pg 11 NY14 ONLLNVId n-6 S101 SONVA LNONd IVJIdAl - �r�ln uvn If S-)ISSIVID WINVhltl3} M J D6-Pg 12 SIC EXHIBIT E D6-Pg 13 ae. , \\§§ER )§§E DB-P9 14 m N E n z_ Q Lj D6—Pg15 BONN lOA NONN NONE uaN uaa L ■NON 0. 02. �l919 1 i r i i r E 0 O r tl i S Q i D6-Pg 16 0 2 D6-Pg 17 7 s` E m d o ¢ a c o z-nads�a $n� �m �ooa0000 00000a f S z a z Q Z U Q c U C/J N J co u T Q V —G Q L Q Z 2 J Q d F- W WE w ti N 0 i D6-Pg 19 6 D6-Pg 20 s x U Z Q Q z C) 0 W J Q U Z J d f O O J u. U z Q J N W i Q_ z a a D6-Pg 21 N a 4 ig � ds S A �000000 0000000 --E O S b Z a D6-Pg 22 f o v '1 LL 4 D6-Pg 23 LL O Q _A U3 U U U Q J E U Q 5 c o z= Q � H w D6-Pg 24 / E [ ! ) , Gq I \ z « ■ / \ 1'� [--- . Al . >y -e 25 ti Y y „$ a000a o000 k 0 0 z z a S D6-Pg 26 I <1 0 x n z -- a z s 3 3 2 U_ 3 a S2 Z (n K c 3 _J U , -__- Q Q C N o Q Z J T d W D6-Pg 27 0 a Q 2 z U —_ w H U m¢¢ z co 4 cn� m mco N -cca zvz�o U Q m Z a C V �v+or O fU m U m N N — z ui J \ k � ■ R-e 29 K LL O G i Z U rU _ ZD a= J U N ❑ Z � - z� J Q d H W D6-Pg 30 m I / J"T ] ------ , Al -- -- «;6ldle 7k l; \ »-m 31 \ � ; , d �o a E ❑n ❑e E ❑e ^❑E ❑P 0 O z Z i a F D6-Pg 32 u {; m 8 N f n_ S 5 D6-Pg 33 Q g E- n P151. tm O N O Z a o a = 13 _ 2 U 7 CO — v_ _ U] co c� z CD,�; ccc d U � _ + » of z m + co z w J d INHIqq y �ti` I � D6-Pg 34 { k k | ; ! eERBEeRe Bem@mq' |]� ! ; � � \ k � G-a 35 0 Q N F z !s f D6—Pg 36 U z z CD 0 W J ¢ U z J a m CD CD J LL U C) z J [1 6 D6-Pg 37 i L U i 2 5 is �m �000000 ooa000 i cn U s• •m S F D6-Pg 39 %:)Cr I CIVIor- c a, w I I- I :uu V.nn. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Ray Wimberly `C On F' �.l Rich Macias X Candyce Burnett Donald Granger Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag. Associate Planner and Tom Grahn, Associate Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. C1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20080 - MANNING HOMES - A review of a proposed 20-lot subdivision on a parcel of about 5.43 acres of land in the Low Residential (L) District (2.0 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre) located at the EXHIBIT F D6-Pg40 SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street; APN: 1076-081-01; Related Files: Design Review DRC2017-00129, Variance DRC2017-00130, Minor Exception DRC2017- 00131 and Landmark Designation DRC2017-00485. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00129 - MANNING HOMES - A request for site plan and architectural review of 19 single-family residential homes in conjunction with a 20-lot subdivision of about 5.43 acres of land within the Low Residential (L) District (2.0 to 4.0 dwelling units per acre) located at the northwest corner of Hermosa Avenue and Victoria Street; APN: 1076-081-01; Related Files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20080, Variance DRC2017-00130, Minor Exception DRC2017-00131 and Landmark Designation DRC2017-00485. The Committee recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review subject to the applicant adding windows to all of the garage doors. C2. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 - MANNING HOMES - A request for site plan and architectural review of 16 single-family residences on 8.32 acres of land within the Low (L) District (2-4 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan on the south side of Carnesi Drive and east of Etiwanda Avenue; APNs: 0227-061-03 and 82. Related Files: General Plan Amendment DRC2013-00961, Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2013-00962, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936, Variance DRC2014-00219 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2014- 00113. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. The Committee approved as presented and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. C3. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2017-00391 - FENG XIAO ARCHITECT, INC - A proposed design modification for six (6) previously approved single-family homes in the Low (L) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet south of Wilson Avenue on the east side of Winchester Court; APN: 020118236. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. The Committee reviewed the initial proposal and revised elevation provided by the applicant and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. D. ADJOURNMENT 7:29 P.M. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. D6-Pg 41 SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist II with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, August 24, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. D6—Pg 42 RESOLUTION NO. 17-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF 16 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON 6.59-ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE LOW (L) DISTRICT (2-4 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CARNESI DRIVE AND EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE- AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNS: 0227-061-03 AND 82. A. Recitals 1. Carnesi, LLC. (Manning Homes) filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2017-00378 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 11th day of October, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded the hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting on October 11, 2017, including written and oral staff reports and public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to an undeveloped site located on the south side of Carnesi Drive and east of Etiwanda Avenue; and b. The site is approximately 670 feet from north to south and 400 feet east to west. The existing grade elevation is approximately 1,390 feet along the north property line and 1,370 along the south property line, for a total grade change of approximately 20 feet. The site has been regularly cleared of vegetation and the on -site trees have been removed for the proposed development; and C. The project site is within the Low (Low) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. To the north are single-family residences in the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. To the west are single-family residences and a church within the Very'Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. To the east are single-family residences within the Low (L) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. To the south is a church within the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan: and D6—Pg 43 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-85 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 — CARNESI, LLC. (MANNING HOMES) October 11, 2017 Page 2 d. The project is for the site plan and Design Review approval of 16 single-family residences on a previously approved 16 lot subdivision (SUBTT18936); and e. Three (3) separate floor plans are proposed, along with 3 different elevations for Plans 1 and 3 (Spanish, Tuscan and California Ranch) and 2 different elevations for Plan 2 (Spanish and Tuscan). Plan #1 is single -story and includes 3,640 square feet of living area, a 701-square foot garage, a 217-square foot rear porch and 128-square foot front porch. Plan #2 is two-story and includes 4,394 square feet of living area, a 829-square foot garage, a 208 square foot rear porch and a 159-square foot front porch. Plan #3 is two-story and includes 4,546 square feet of living area, a 923-square foot garage, a 210-square foot rear patio and a 184-square foot front patio; and f. The proposed houses comply with the development standards applicable to the Low (L) District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The architecture of each house is consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and g. The Design Review Committee recommended approval of the proposed project on September 5, 2017. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The construction of 16 single-family residences is consistent with the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which permits the development of single-family homes at a density of 2 to 4 dwelling units per acre and the underlying General Plan designation is Low Residential; and b. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, including setbacks, building height and lot coverage. The project includes property line walls up to 11 feet in height for which a Variance (DRC2014-00219) was previously approved with the original subdivision of the project site (SUBTT18936); and C. The proposed development, togetherwith the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site will be developed in accordance with the previously approved subdivision map; and the proposed land use (single-family dwelling units) is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 21, 2015, in PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-85 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 — CARNESI, LLC. (MANNING HOMES) October 11, 2017 Page 3 connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances underwhich the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Design Review DRC2017-00378, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The proposed project involves the Design Review for 16 single-family residences on a previously approved tract map. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The proposed project is consistent with the previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18936 for a 16-lot residential subdivision, as the project consists of the Design Review for 16 houses. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff's determination that, no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's approval of Design Review DRC2017-00378. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AN ATTEST: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary D6—Pg 45 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-85 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00378 — CARNESI, LLC. (MANNING HOMES) October 11, 2017 Page 4 I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certifythatthe foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11 th day of October 2017, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 9. •. L3 Project #: DRC2017-00378 Project Name: Carnes! Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Location: 6723 ETIWANDA AVE - 022750415-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Provide the future homeowners of Lots 6, 7, 10, 12, 14 and 16, with written notification that the lot coverage on these lots is at or just below the maximum permitted 30 percent lot coverage, which will limit the construction of additional solid roof structures on the these lots. 2. The stone veneer shall not be greater than 6 inches above finished grade. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 8. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. Printed: 9l21/2027 www.CltyofRC.us D6—Pg 47 Project #: DRC2017-00378 Project Name: Carnesi Location: Project Type: 6723 ETIWANDA AVE - 022750415-0000 Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 10. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 11. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 12. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 13. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 16. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 17. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per ach 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 18. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. Printed: 9/11/2017 www.CilyofRC.us Page 2 of 8 Project #: DRC2017-00378 Project Name: Carnesi Location: Project Type: 6723 ETIWANDA AVE - 022750415-0000 Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Comply with all Conditions of Approval from subtt18936. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. 1. Annexation of the parcel map: the project must be annexed into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1. The annexation must be completed prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. 2. Before occupancy is granted the Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) to Pinon St. must be constructed and accepted by RCFPD Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required for new structures. These Homes are not located in the VHFHSZ Grading Section Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. 'The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. Printed: 9/11/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 8 Project #: DRC2017-00378 Project Name: Carnesi Location: Project Type: 6723 ETIWANDA AVE - 022750415-0000 Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 6. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 11. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off -site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown, in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. Printed: 9/11/2017 w w.CityofRC.us D6—Pg 50 Page 4 of 8 Project#: DRC2017-00378 Project Name: Carnesi Location: 6723 ETIWANDA AVE - 022750415-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 14. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 15. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 16.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. A copy of any notarized agreements or recorded easements shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plans prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 17.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. A copy of any notarized agreements or recorded easements shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plans prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). w W.Cityof zcros Printed: 9/11/2017 Page 5 of 8 D6—Pg 51 Project #: DRC2017-00378 Project Name: Carnesi Location: 6723 ETIWANDA AVE - 022750416-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off -site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. A recorded easement shall be required on Lots, 6, 7 and 8 at a minimum along the south property line. 21, Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 23. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 25. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 26. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 27. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 28. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. Printed: 9/1112017 w`nw.CityofRC.us Page 6 0( 8 D6—Pg 52 Project #: DRC2017-00378 Project Name: Carnes! Location: 6723 ETIWANDA AVE - 022750415-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain. on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs. associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 31. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 32. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 33. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water . quality management plan. 35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D. Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". Printed: 9/11/2017 w w.CltyofRC.us Page 7 of a D6—Pg 53 Project#: DRC2017-00378 Project Name: Carnesi Location: 6723 ETIWANDA AVE - 022750415-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 37. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 38. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 39. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads, prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan and issuance of a grading permit, a minimum of one (1) infiltration test shall be required per each infiltration pit (WQMP BMP device) for each lot. Printed: 9/11/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page B of 8 D6—Pg 54