The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About17-12 - Resolutions - To Allow For One Year Time Extention RESOLUTION NO. 17-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960 - A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 3-LOT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (SUBTPM18626) LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LEMON AVENUE AND DAYLILY COURT AT 9923 LEMON AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0201-902-16. A. Recitals. 1. Jaime Campos filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 18626, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On January 12, 2011, this Commission adopted its Resolution No. 11-01, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On February 10, 2016, this Commission adopted its Resolution No 16-06, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 4. On February 8, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on February 8, 2017, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel of approximately 27,400 square feet(0.63 acre) with dimensions of approximately 210 feet(north to south)by approximately 130 feet(east to west), located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court; and b. The project site is surrounded in all directions by single-family residences; and c. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Low (L) Residential District; and d. The site is partially developed with a single-family residence. Vegetation on-site includes short grasses, shrubs and trees; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-12 TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960—JAIME CAMPOS February 8, 2017 Page 2 e. The application contemplates the subdivision of the subject parcel into three(3)lots for single-family residential development; and f. The existing single-family residence will remain in-place on Parcel 2. A corresponding driveway and drive approach will be constructed to provide vehicle access to Daylily Court. The existing driveway and drive approach will be removed; and g. Individual lot areas will be 9,635 square feet, 9,105 square feet, and 8,455 square feet for Parcels 1, 2, and 3, respectively(these dimensions exceed the minimum of 7,200 square feet with a minimum average of 8,000 square feet), the depth of each lot will be approximately 130 feet, which will exceed the required minimum depth of 100 feet, and the width of each lot will be at least 65 feet; and h. The applicant has submitted an application to develop a house on parcel 3. This development will be subject to review and action by the Design Review Committee and, if necessary, the Planning Commission at a later date. Parcels 1 and 3 will remain vacant until then; and i. All lots will have access to a public right-of-way. Access to the project site will be via Daylily Court. The street was constructed with Tract 16431 and all public right-of-way improvements including pavement, sidewalk, curb, and gutter on the east side of the street are present. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into three parcels and is consistent with the development district of the project site. b. The site is physically-suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west are developed with single-family residential homes. Most of the street improvements along both Daylily Court and Lemon Avenue are already in place with the exception of street trees and street lights. The installation of these improvements will be required by the Engineering Department as conditions of approval. c. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into three parcels— no development of the site is proposed. d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one year time extensions. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-12 TIME EXTENSION DRC2016-00960— JAIME CAMPOS February 8, 2017 Page 3 • 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project qualifies as a Class 15 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315—Minor Land Divisions-as the proposal is to subdivide the property into four parcels or less. A pending application has been submitted to develop Parcel 3 which will be reviewed by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission if necessary at a later date. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension for: Tentative Map Applicant Expiration SUBTPM18626 Jaime Campos January 13, 2018 6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 above, this Commission hereby modifies the conditions of approval contained in Resolution No. 11-01 and the Conditions, attached thereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to read as follows: 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: (D\AAgt---- Candyc urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of February 2017, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE