The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016-10-26 - Agenda Packet - PC-HPCThe City of Rancho Cucamonga THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF RanchoCucamonga jhe HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 26,2016 -7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California I.Call To Order Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Oaxaca Vice Chairman Macias Munoz Wimberly Fletcher II.Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda.State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission orthePlanning Commission from addressinganyissue not previously includedon the Agenda.The Historic Preservation Commission orthe Planning Commission mayreceivetestimonyand set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less,as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak.All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. Thisis a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loudnoises, orengaginginany activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III.Consent Calendar/Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission A.Consideration of minutes dated September 28,2016 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Rancho OCTOBER 26j 2016 Gl'CAMONGA Page 2 IV.Public Hearings/Planning Commission The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony.All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project.Please sign in after speaking. B.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units) on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN: 1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14.Related Files:Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007and Minor Exception DRC2016-00455.Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. C.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00007 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A request to remove 62 trees forthe development ofa 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units) on 4.78 acres of land In the Mixed Use (MU) District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN:1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14.Related Files:Design Review DRC2016-00006 and MinorException DRC2016-00455.Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. D.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00455 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to reduce on-site parking by 25% for the developmentofa 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units) on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN:1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14.Related Files:Design Review DRC2016-00006 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007.Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. E.TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20026 -10235 ALTA LOMA,LLC -A request to subdivide a parcel of 1.67 acres,into six (6)parcels,in the Low Residential (L)District located south of 19th Street between Hermosa Avenue and Haven Avenue;APN:1076-121-03.Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 32 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332)exemption,which covers in-fill development on no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses.Related case file:Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00613. F.ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-01174 - 4TH AND MILL.- A request for live entertainment at 4th &Mill Bar, Pizza and Grill,within the Mixed Use Retail (MUR)zone of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan located at 11260 4th Street-APN:0210-581-02.Staff has Rancho Ci^AMONGA HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 26,2016 Page 3 determined that the project is categorically exempt under Section 15301 as a Class 1 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. V.Commission Business/Historic Preservation and Planning Commission G.INTER-AGENCY UPDATES H.COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS VI.Adjournment I,LoisJ.Schrader,Planning Commission Secretary ofthe CityofRancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certifythat a true,accurate copy ofthe foregoing agenda was posted on October 20, 2016, at least 72hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga. Ifyou need special assistance or accommodations to participate in tliis meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909)477-2750.Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Cityto make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility.Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression ofallpointsofview. Toallow all persons tospeak, given the length of the agenda,please keep yourremarks brief.If others have already expressed your position,you may simply Indicatethat you agree with a previous speaker.Ifappropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group.To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping,booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The publicmay address the Planning Commission onany agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table.State your name for the record and speak intothe microphone.After speaking,please sign inon the clipboard located next tothe speaker's podium. It is important to list your name,address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to.Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 26,2016 Cucamonga _Page 4 If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under "Public Comments."There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. Acopyofany such materials should also be providedto the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing.Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies ofthe staff reports or other documentation to each agenda itemare on fileinthe offices ofthe Planning Department.City Hall,located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730.These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m.,except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees withthe CityPlanning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision tothe CityCouncil within 10 calendar days. Anyappeal filed must be directed to the CityClerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,597 for all decisions of the Commission.(Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas,staff reports and minutes can be found at www.C itvofRC .us. Vicinity IVlap Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting OCTOBER 26,2016 19th St^ Base Line I Foothil Arrow Church / B,C,D E F Items B, C, D:DR DRC2016-00006;TRP DRC2016-00007;AND ME DRC2016-00455 Item E:Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20026 ItemF:BP DRC2016-01174 V) 6th (0will Base Line Church Footh Arrow ★Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive The City of Rancho Cucamonga THE REGULAR MINUTES OF RanchoCucamonga jHE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 28,2016 -7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 1.Call To Order Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Oaxaca X Vice Chairman Macias A Munoz X Wimberiy X Fletcher X It is noted for the record that Vice Chairman Macias'absence is excused. Additional Staff Present:Candyce Burnett, CityPlanner,Steven Flovi/er,Assistant City Attorney; Dan James,Senior Civil Engineer;Albert Espinoza,Asst. City Engineer;Dominick Perez, Associate Planner:Lois Schrader,Planning Commission Secretary;Mike Smith,Senior Planner II.Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda.State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commissionorthe PlanningCommission from addressing anyissue notpreviouslyincludedon the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individualor less,as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak.All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience.Thisis a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected.Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises, or engaging in any activitywhich might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None Item A-1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES I^ANCHO SEPTEMBER 28,2016O^CAMONO.2 III.Consent Calendar/Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission A.Consideration of minutes dated August 24,2016 B.Vacation of Portions of Center Avenue,located west of Haven Avenue and south of Arrow Route {V-233) Moved by Munoz,second by Wimberly to adopt the Consent Calendar as presented,carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent) IV.Public Hearings/Planning Commission The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law.The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony.All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project.Please sign in after speaking. C.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18908 - RICHLAND VENTURES,INC. - A proposed subdivision of approximately 10.6 acres into 30 single-family detached lots within the Low (L)Residential District in the Etiwanda North Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Wilson Avenue - APN: 1087-081-25.Per CEQA Section 15073,5.c,staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and with a public hearing will consider the project and amended mitigation measures. Dominick Perez,Associate Planner gave the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file).Issues were resolved and mitigation measures were clarified and strengthened with respect to the questions received on the Biological Resource portion of the environmental assessment and the Cultural Resource Mitigation measures. Chairman Oaxaca opened the public hearing. John Schafer,Vice President of Richland Ventures,Inc,said he is lookingforward to moving ahead with the project. Seeing and hearing no further comment from the public.Chairman Oaxaca closed the public hearing. Chairman Oaxaca noted that he appreciates the City's thorough approach to CEQA review and how the City works with the applicants to allow for development but also has many Item A -2 ANCHO HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28,2016 Page 3 UGAMONGA acres in reserve as a biologica!resource to help find a balance. Moved by Munoz,seconded by Wimberly carried 4-0-1 (Macias absent)to adopt the Resolution of Approval for the project and to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. V.Commission Business/Historic Preservation and Planning Commission D.INTER-AGENCY UPDATES None E-COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS None VI.Adjournment 7:15 PM I,LoisJ.Schrader,Planning Commission Secretary ofthe City ofRancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certifythat a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 22, 2016, at least 72 hours priortothe meetingper GovernmentCode Section 54964.2at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga. Ifyou need special assistance or accommodations to participate inthis meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909)477-2750.Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the Cityto make reasonable anrangements to ensure accessibility.Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The PlanningCommission encourages free expression ofallpointsof view.Toallowallpersons tospeak,given the length of the agenda,please keep your remarks brief.If others have already expressed your position,you may simplyindicate that you agree with a previous speaker.Ifappropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage allviews and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping,booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the PlanningCommissiononanyagenda item. To address the PlanningCommission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table.State your name forthe record and Item A -3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSIONr/planning commission MINUTES SEPTEMBER 28,2016A. Rancho CUCAMONGA aPage4 speak into the microphone.After speaking,please sign inon the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name,address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to.Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. Ifyou wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under "Public Comments."There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners.A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in v\/riting.Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department,City Hall,located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730.These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours,Monday through Thursday. 7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m.,except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within10 calendar days.Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $2,662 for all decisions of the Commission.{Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas,staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Item A-4 Staff Report Pl.\nning Department DATE:October 26,2016 RanCHO TO;Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CuCAMONGA FROM:Candyce Burnett,City Planner BY:Tom Grahn,Associate Planner SUBJECT:ENV1R0NMENTAL ASSESSiVlENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A request to develop a 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units) on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU)District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN:1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14.Related Files:Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007and Minor Exception DRC2016-00455.Staffhas prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00455 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A request to reduce on-site parking by 25%for the development of a 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units)on 4.78 acres ofland inthe Mixed Use (MU)District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue; APN:1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14. Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00006 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration ofenvironmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00007 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A request to remove 62 trees for the development ofa 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units)on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU)District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue; APN:1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14.Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00006 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00455.Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts forconsideration. RECOIVIMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: •Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration forthe project. •Adopt the attached Resolutions with Conditions approving Design Review DRC2016-00006, MinorException DRC2016-00455.and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A. Prolect Densitv: 39.8 dwelling units per acre B.Surrounding Land Use and Zoning; North - Single-Family Residential;Low (L)Residential District South -Restaurant and commercial office uses;Commercial Office (CO)District East -Multi-Family Apartment Complex;Mixed Use (MU)District B,C,D1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 2 West -Commercial and Single-Family Residential;Commercial Office (CO) District and Low (L)Residential District C.General Plan Designations: Project Site - Mixed Use North -Low Residential South -General Commercial East -Mixed Use West -Low Residential and General Commercial D. Site Characteristics:The proposed project site is comprised of two parcels that make up a generally rectangular-shaped project area of approximately 4.78 acres in size (Exhibit A).The southerly half of the site contains a liquor store (Shop &Go), a motel (Motel 66), and a vacant building that was formerly occupied by a night club and associated parking lots;the northerly half of the site is vacant.To the north are single-family residences and to the east is the Viilaggio on Route 66 apartment complex (DRC2006-00633),and an existing,vacant single-family residential house that has been occupied intermittently by commercial uses.To the south across Foothill Boulevard is a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks);and to the west are commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound)and an older multi-family residential complex. The site slopes generally from north to south,and has no landscape features except for several trees located near the north property line and throughout the existing parking lot area. ANALYSIS A.Proiect Overview:The applicant is requesting a Design Review for a 182 unit multi-family residential development which includes 172 apartment units within a generally rectangular shaped apartment building of which a total of 5 Live/Work units are located on the ground floor adjacent to Foothill Boulevard and 5 freestanding carriage buildings,each containing ground floor parking and 2 two-bedroom apartment units on the second floor (total of 10 units).Parking is accommodated within garages,carports,and open parking and approximately 40 bicycle parking spaces.Additionally,the project proposes uncovered tandem parking in some locations. The project is further defined below. B.Proiect Design:The proposed project will be a gated apartment community with 1 vehicle entrance on Foothill Boulevard,and 1 Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA)gate on Hermosa Avenue (Exhibit B).The focal point of the Foothill Boulevard frontage are the 5 LiveAA/ork units facing the street and the Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue Corner Plaza with enhanced landscaping (Exhibits B & F).The LiveAA^ork units are designed so that the first floor can be utilized for commercial purposes,while the second floor provides living space.Access to the LiveAA/ork units is by the sidewalk off of Foothill Boulevard,the adjacent garage,or the second floor interior hallway.None of the apartment units have direct pedestrian access by sidewalk or private open space to either Foothill Boulevard or Hermosa Avenue,but can be accessed by 2 pedestrian access locations off Hermosa Avenue,and 1 off Foothill Boulevard (Exhibit B). The leasing office,gym,and on-site amenities are interior to the project site and do not have direct street frontage off either Foothill Boulevard or Hermosa Avenue. The 4-story apartment building is situated in the southwest corner of the project site adjacent to the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue with building setbacks at 20 feet off of Foothill Boulevard and 15 feet off of Hermosa Avenue.The Site Plan (Exhibit B)proposes a B,C,D2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 3 generally rectangular shaped apartment building containing 172 apartments providing a mix of one-,two-,and three-bedroom units.Five freestanding carriage buildings,each containing 10 garage parking spaces onthe first floor and2 two-bedroom apartment units onthe second floor are located north and east of the primary apartment building.The combined unit mix for the primary 172 unit apartment building and 5 carriage buildings is 182 apartment units.The middle ofthe apartment building provides a courtyard,with a pool and other commonopen space areas (Exhibit D).Parking is provided through a combination of garage,carport,and uncovered parking spaces;tenant parking spaces within the complex are assigned (Exhibits B,I,&L). Garage units are located interior tothe site on the first floor ofthe primary apartment building and the first floor ofeach carriage unit.Carport parking is provided inthe northernand easterly portions ofthe project site,adjacent to the existing single-family homes to the north and the apartment complex totheeast.Open parking spaces are provided throughout the site.In those instances where a tandem uncovered parking space is located directly adjacent to a garage space or standard uncovered parking space,both the garage space/standard parking space and adjacent tandem parking space are assigned to the same tenant. The architectural design of the building is contemporary and utilizes a variety of materials including siding,stucco,stone veneer,metal railings and metal canopies,vinyl windows,scored stucco, and aluminum storefronts (Exhibits J &K).The building is of a general rectangular shape with a flat roof and substantial articulation in the building plane,including vertical movement between 3 and 4 story elevations, and substantial horizontal movement in the building plane;all features that contribute tothe contemporary architectural design.The 3 and 4 story building mass was intentionally located on the southern portion of the lot to reduce impacts to the existing single family residences to the north ofthe project site.Balconies with private open space are provided foreach apartment unit;balconies range in size from 40to 102 square feet. The 2storycarriage buildings utilize a design and material concept consistent with the primary apartment building (Exhibit J). The architectural design Is consistent with the design concept presented inthe Planning Commission Pre-Application Workshop and Design Review Committee review of the project proposal. A uniquefeature of the project is the Sky Deck on the roofof the primary apartment building. The 3,000 square foot Sky Deck is centrally located to the primary apartment building,but toward the southwest corner of the overall project site (Exhibits F &H).Access to the Sky Deck is by 2 stairways and an elevator,each accessible from the internal hallway on each building floor.The Sky Deck provides an open area for tenant gatherings, and includes such things as screen walls, an entertainment area,seating,a barbeque,and kitchen amenities. C. Residential Unit Breakdown: The proposed development will consist of 182 units housed primarily ina 4-story apartment building containing 172 unitsand 5 detached carriage buildings each containing 2 second floor units, for a total of 182 apartment units. The unit mix consists of 106 one-bedroom units (ranging in size from 716 to 794 square feet) (including 5 live/work units of 1,523 square feet, each providing 794 square feet of commercial floor area and 729 square feet of living area), 70 two-bedroom units (ranging in size from 1,090 to 1,203 square feet), and 6 three-bedroom units (containing 1,462 square feet). D.Recreational Amenities: The Development Code requires that multi-family projects containing between 101 and 200 units provide 5 recreational amenities,or their equivalent (Section 17.36.010.E.3)throughoutthe projectsite. The project exceeds this requirement and provides B,C,D3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 4 recreational amenities designed to meet the interests of their residents.The proposed recreational amenities include: 1.Club room/meeting room. 2.Indoor fitness center. 3.Central pool courtyard with a lap pool,spa,and sun deck. 4.Entertainment patio with enclosed courtyard, outdoor fire table, and ping pong table. 5.Enclosed dog park with benches,and an interior pet wash facility. 6.Garden courtyard with seating areas,3 sided fireplace,barbeque withcounter, and group seating nodes. 7. Two community garden areas with raised plots,decomposed granite paving, and tubular steel fence enclosure. 8.Short term bike rack storage at 2 locations,and an interior bike storage/bike maintenance facility. 9. Sky deck centrally located on the building roof that provides seating areas,cantilevered overhead structures providing an entertainment wall and communal table,outdoor kitchen with barbeque facilities,and a low sided fireplace. E.Compatibility with Mixed Use fMU)District Development Standards and General Plan Mixed Use fMU)Designation: In2008, inconjunction with the workforce housing project located along Foothill Boulevard just west of Center Avenue, 17 acres of land was changed in the General Plan from General Commercial to Mixed Use.The 17 acres of land included the proposed 4.78 acre project area.On May 19,2010,the CityCouncil,withthe recommendation ofthe Planning Commission,adopted the City's 2010 General Plan. As part of the 2010 update the land use designations for several additional parcels were changed to Mixed Use.Also,on July 6, 2016 the CityCouncil adopted an amendment to change the land use designation of multiple parcels along Foothill Boulevard to Mixed Use (total of7 new MU areas).Presently,there are a total of 20 MU Areas. The majority of these MU Areas are generally located along Foothill Boulevard, which is considered to be a "core commercial spine" of the City and near intersections with major north-south streets (e.g., Archibald Avenue, Haven Avenue, and Milliken Avenue). In addition to being a major east-west corridor where a significant amount of commercial uses are concentrated.Foothill Boulevard is a transit corridor for Omnitrans Bus Route #66 and a proposed future Bus Rapid Transit Line that will have a stop at Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue.Research indicates that there is a nexus between transit route ridership and Mixed Use Projects when projects are within 1/2 mile of an existing transit stop.The project site is located adjacent to the existing Omnitrans Bus Route #66 and is within V2 mile of the proposed Bus Rapid Transit line that will run from Pomona to Fontana with multiple stops in Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequent to the 2010 adoption of the General Plan, on July 18,2012,the City Council,upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission,adopted the City's updated Development Code. Although this update included a Mixed Use Development Standards section,specific B,C,D4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 5 development standards (density,building setbacks,building height,etc.)were not included at the time of adoption in 2012.As a result, the Planning Department then pursued strategies to research and develop these standards.Research methods included the following:contacting other cities, interviewing planners,architects,and developers from other cities and re-drafting sections ofthe Development Code that pertain to mixed use development.Additionally,the City has been involved In multiple projects that assisted in the creation of "Phase 1"of Mixed Use Development Standards.A brief history of the projects is outlined below: • The Compass Blueprint Project:The Compass Blueprint Project (Foothill Boulevard Bus Rapid Transit Study)evaluated where transit oriented development could occur that would support Bus Rapid Transit along Foothill Boulevard. This document was received by the City Council on June 19,2013. • Designand Sign Tour;OnOctober 30,2013,Planning staffconducted a tour with the City Council and the Planning Commission during a joint public meeting.The tour was organized to show how higher density development projects that usually entail a form of mixedland use can workharmoniously with other types ofland uses such as lowerdensity single-family residential. The tour included visiting three different cities:Santa Clarita, Pasadena,and Monrovia.Each city had various types of developments at different densities,architectural styles and mixed land use types, but all have incorporated a successful project within the existing built environment. •Economic Development Strategic Plan: The City adopted its Economic Development Strategic Plan (EDSP) in February 2015. One of the Plan's goal is to create an environment that is attractiveto the younger population,help revitalizedecliningshopping centers,and encourage mixed use development.In order to attract office-based businesses that cater to the "Millennial"workforce,it will be critical for the City to facilitate development of walkable and bike-friendly mixed-use places that are appealing to this demographic group.These types of mixed-use places are also consistent with the City's goal to encourage a healthy and sustainability lifestyle for residents and visitors, as envisioned in the Healthy RC initiative. In keeping with implementing the General Plan,in 2015 the City Council adopted several goals during an assessment ofthe City's objectives.One ofthe City Council goals (Objective #A24) from 2015 was to establish Mixed Use Development Standards in order to start implementing the vision laidout under the 2010 General Plan.In keeping with that goal.Phase I Mixed Use Development Standards were presented to the Planning Commission as a workshop item on July8,2015,and as a public hearing item on August 12,2015.With a recommendation bythe Planning Commission,these Mixed Use Standards (Phase 1)were reviewed and adopted by the City Council on October 21, 2015. The second City Council goal from 2015 was to investigate and create Mixed Use overlay districts and refine development standards.This phase (Phase II)of Mixed Use standards are currently being researched and evaluated by Planning staff and will include the following:1) review of the City's zoning districts and evaluating/investigating creating overlay districts or specificplan areas that will create villages or Development Districts in order to revitalize underperforming or underutilized areas and create synergy amongst the varying land uses,and 2) adoption ofspecific parking standards for Mixed Use projects that factor in shared parking relationships and transit use that are directly applicable to calculating on-site parking demand for Mixed Use projects. Staff anticipates that the adoption of specific parking standards for Mixed Use projects will eliminate the need for B,C,D5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 6 applicants to request reductions in parking.Phase II of the Mixed Use standards is anticipated to be brought before the Planning Commission in the Spring of 2017.Itis Important to note that the proposed project was submitted and deemed complete prior to review and adoption of Phase 11 Development Standards for Mixed Use projects and the project is subject to the current standards for Mixed Use projects as found in the Development Code as adoption In Phase I. This includes provisions to allow for a reduction In parking if analytically supported by a parking study and confirmed with a peer evaluation.Additionally, this development application complies with all other development standards applicable to the MU District Including, but not limited to: density (up to 50 dwelling units per acre),building height (up to 75 feet),building setbacks (50% to 75%reduction along major and secondary arterials),and landscaping (10%of project site). F.Project Parking Overview:The proposed apartment complex requires a total of 388 parking spaces based on a summation of uses within the project Including the number of bedrooms in each unit,the Live/Work commercial floor area,and guest parking.This includes 311 parking spaces based on the bedroom mix (182 of which are required to be covered in a garage or carport),16 parking spaces for the LiveAA/ork retail component (based on 3,970 square feet of retail floor area),and 61 guest parking spaces.The design of the complex proposes to provide 293 parking spaces on-slte through a mix of garage,carport,and open parking spaces and also proposes 16 on-street parking spaces along the east side of Hermosa Avenue (Exhibit M) for a total of 309 parking spaces available for the project.The Development Code requires all project parking to be provided on-site,so the 16 on-street parking spaces do not count towards the on- slte parking requirement,although they may be used by project residents and will contribute to the overall parking provided for the apartment complex.Additionally,the project will also provide a total of 42 bicycle spaces,which will help promote alternative modes of transportation. The Mixed Use development standards stipulate that parking for mixed use projects Is based on the Development Code requirement for the individual uses within the development verified through a parking study,which reviews the adequacy of the number of proposed parking spaces.The parking study Is also required to be peer reviewed by a third party consultant contracted by the City. IfItIs determined that a reduced number of parking spaces is adequate for all of the uses within a mixed use project, an application for a Minor Exception or Variance Is necessary to reduce the required number of parking spaces.As permitted by the current Development Code,a Minor Exception application (DRC2016-00455)was submitted requesting a 24.48% reduction In on-slte parking. As stated above,based upon Development Code requirements,the project requires 388 parking spaces but provides 293 on-site,which calculates to a 95 stall or 24.48%parking reduction.The project proposes to provide16 on- street parking spaces along Hermosa Avenue (Exhibit M),which are not factored into the amount of on-site parking,but will be available to be used by the residents and contribute to available parking.Garage parking spaces will be located on the first floor of the apartment building and oriented to the interior ofthe project.Carports are freestanding structures primarily located along the north and east project perimeter.Tandem parking spaces provided are throughout the project primarily located adjacent to garage parking spaces,but also adjacent to a few uncovered parking spaces.To avoid the potential for parking conflicts,garage and the adjacent tandem parking space will always be assigned to the same tenant. G. Proiect Parking Analysis: The following table outlines the total required number of parking spaces byunittype,number of guest parking spaces and the number of covered parking spaces with an enclosed garage and carport. B,CD6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 7 Type Number of Units Development Code Standard Required Covered Parking Parking Spaces Required Total Provldecl Parking One Bedroom Units 106 1.5 Spaces/Unit (1 Covered Space) 106 159 Two Bedroom Units 70 2.0 Spaces/Unit (1 Covered Space) 70 140 Three Bedroom Units 6 2.0 Spaces/Unit (1 Covered Space) 6 12 Retail Parking 3,970 1 space for each 250 square feet of leasable area 0 16 1 Guest Parking 182 !1 per 3 units 0 1 61 Enclosed Garage Spaces i 98 1 Carport Spaces .84 Covered Spaces Required (Garage and Carport)182 Covered Spaces Provided (Garage and Carport)182 Total Parking Spaces Required 388 SIVIinwExcepti0n1(24?48;l=erce]nt*BarktiT9iRe^^ f,eptentiallG:hlStreet'Rarki.iTp;SRac^'^«®^^ ^;T6taI:Ha?kiiin$^yaiIab|eI(Oyi\Slte/PnnStreet)Js'ls23?<2¥^^/^<|#;i«^^ The applicant has submitted a Parking Analysis,which finds that the proposed number of parking spaces is adequate to meet the parking demand forthe proposed mix of uses within the project.The parking study evaluated the parking demand of similar mixed use projects in other cities in Southern California and finds thatthe proposed project exceedsthe parking ratios provided by similar projects reviewed inthe study. Due to the significant reduction in on-site parking proposed for this complex,conditions of approval have been included that require a Parking Management Plan tobe submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to occupancy.The Parking Management Planshall include, at a minimum,requirements thatthe use ofthe garages and carports will be strictly monitored. The City Planner may periodically review and require additional parking mitigation measures if It is determined that the on-site parking is inadequate to meet the project's ongoing parking demand. Parking Analysis:Linscott,Law,&Greenspan,Engineers (May 4,2016)prepared the Parking Analysis to determine if the proposed parking supply could adequately meet the proposed project's parking needs. To reach their conclusions,the applicant evaluated how the proposed project meets City parking standards,and also how the proposal fared under industry publications (Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Parking Generation.Urban Land Institute's (ULI's)Shared Parking,Parking Reform Made Easy,and an application of parking ratios developed from field studies conducted at similar sites).The Parking Analysis addresses the following: 1.Application of City's development standards requires 388 parking spaces; 293 are provided on site,16 are provided on-street along Hermosa Avenue,providing a total of 309spaces, and resulting in a deficiency of95spaces (without on-street parking)and 79 parking spaces (with on-street parking).The resulting requirement is a "blended"ratio of 2.14 parking spaces per unit forthe project.The blendedsupplyis based on a summation of different parking requirements for residential,commercial (LiveA/Vork),and guest parking.The reportstates that this parking ratio is conservative and likely overestimates the potential parking needs because ofthe high numberof one-bedroom units,parkedat B,C,D7 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007.DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 8 1.5 parking spaces per unit,and implies that every other unit is occupied by a couple and/or has [vjo cars,an unlikely scenario for a typical one-bedroom tenancy.Additionally, a more appropriate guest parking requirement is 1 space per 4 units, not 1 space per 3 units as required.Providing 309 parking spaces,293 on-site and 16 on-street,provides parking at a ratio of 1.7 parking spaces per unit. 2. Application of the ITE Parking Generation publication results in a parking requirement of 240 parking spaces;a parking supply of 309 parking spaces provides a surplus of 69 parking spaces. 3. Application of the ULi Shared Parking publication, plus the City code requirement for the LiveAA/ork commercial floor area results in a parking requirement of 316 parking spaces; a deficiency of 7 parking spaces (with on street parking included).However,operationally the proposed project will still provide adequate parking because during the evening hours when the residential parking requirement is at its peak,the 16 parking spaces utilized by the LiveAA/ork patrons would not be occupied as those businesses would likely be closed, thus allowing the apartment residents and/or guests the shared use of these spaces. Conversely,when the LiveAA/ork spaces are at their daily peak (between 8:00 am and 6:00 pm),the apartment demand is below the 293 spaces,so the combined peak demand will be below 309 spaces. 4.Application of the Parking Reform IVIade Easy publication,plus the City code requirement for the LiveAA/ork commercial floor area results in a parking requirement range of 304 to 318 parking spaces;resulting in a surplus/deficiency range of 5 (surplus)to 9 (deficiency) parking spaces (with on-street parking included).Further analysis of multi-family housing contained in the publication results in parking requirements of 280 to 311 parking spaces. Although there are slight surplus or deficiencies noted,operationally,the project will still provide adequate parking through the use of shared parking,similar to the ULI analysis. 5. A comparison of 3 similar apartment complexes,plus the City code requirement for the LiveAA/ork commercial floor area results in a parking requirement significantly lower than the parking proposed for this apartment complex. Summary:The Parking Analysis concludes by stating that the 293 on-site parking spaces and 16 on-street parking spaces will provide a total of 309 parking spaces,or a supply ratio of 1.7 parking spaces per unit,which is adequate to support the parking demand of the project.When the 16 on-street spaces are not included,the parking supply ratio is 1.6 parking spaces per unit. Conclusion:The Parking Analysis finds that on-site parking will be adequate to support all project uses.With the additional on-street parking provided along Hermosa Avenue,the project should have a more than adequate parking to support the project.Staff supports the related Minor Exception (DRC2016-00455)to reduce on-site parking by 95 parking spaces and to permit on-street parking along the east side of Hermosa Avenue. H.Peer Review of Parking Studv:Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates (July 5,2016) conducted a peer review on the Parking Analysis submitted for the project by Linscott, Law, & Greenspan,Engineers (May 4,2016).They evaluated the overall parking supply proposal and the analysis used to determine the proposed parking supply ratio of 1.7 spaces per unit.They concluded that "many of the assumptions and inputs used in the analysis are higher than necessary,and could likely be reduced if the City and Developer wish to provide a parking B,C,D8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00007.AND DRC2G16-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26.2016 Page 9 supply that reduces excess parking demand on site."Comments that supported this conclusion include: 1.All of the case studies and nationally recognized models (ITE,ULI,etc.)show that the parking ratio should be less than 1.7 parking spaces per unit. 2. Although the case studies were useful in providing an understanding of context,the case studies rely on a parking supply ratio and not a demand ratio, which is the most important argument for considering how much parking to create. 3. The Foothill Boulevard corridormay become a transit emphasis corridorand that potential reductions should be accounted forthose who may shift modes away from driving. 4. The City's parking ratios are very conservative and the analysis reflects it throughout to calculate that parking space requirement for the Live/Work retail units, which should be reconsidered. 5.All of the case studies suggest that the development (based on ratios alone) is overbuilding compared to peer developments and by nationally recognized standards. Reevaluating the project design and providing utilization data from the three Identified case studies could help make the case for why the ratio should be in line with 1.22-1.48 spaces per unit or when being conservative up to 1.5 spaces per unit. I.Minor Exception DRC2015-Q0455: A Minor Exception application was submitted to reduce the total on-site parking by 95 parking spaces,a proposed 24.48 percent reduction in the on-site parking requirement. A Minor Exception (Development Code Section 17.16.110) may be granted to modify development standards provided certain findings can be made,and provides forupto a 25 percent reduction in required on-site parking.The findings offact below support the necessary findings, which are required bythe City's Development Code: 1.Finding:The Minor Exception Is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Facts: The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the General Plan,which has stated policies to support development projects that require infill development to be designed forpedestrians and automobiles equally,and to provide connections totransit and bicycle facilities (Policy LU-2.2).The proposed project provides 293 on-slte parking spaces,as well as 42 secure bicycle parking spaces,and provides convenient access for both pedestrians and automobiles. 2.Finding:The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Facts: The proposed high density mixed use project is located on a major commercial thoroughfare that provides bus service.Furthermore,the project is near in proximity to similar multi-family projects and nearby commercial land uses. 3.Finding:The proposed exceptiontothe specific development standard(s)Is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. B,C,D9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 10 Facts: The proposed reduction in the parking standards is necessary to allow increased residential density on the project site.The General Plan has a stated policy (Policy LU-4.1)to provide new mixed use development opportunities along the Foothill Boulevard corridor to allow residential, commercial and civic uses,and to accommodate both transitand automobiles.The proposed project islocatedadjacenttoa major arterial and provides the opportunity for a mixed use development with convenient access to alternative transportation modes.Additionally,the applicant will provide up to 16 additional on-street parking spaces that will offset the 95 parking space reduction. 4.Finding:The granting ofthe Minor Exception will not constitute a grantof special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other propertiesclassified in the same district,and will not be detrimental to public health,safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements In the vicinity. Facts:The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is not a grantof special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the required number of parking spaces where the applicant has demonstrated that the project will provide adequate parking for all on-site uses.The applicant has submitted a parking study (Linscott,Law,&Greenspan,Engineers;May 4,2016)verifying the adequacy of the proposed number of on-site parking spaces. Development Code Section 17.64.060.C.provides that parking reductions, other than for a single-family,second dwelling unit,or two-family dwelling,may be reduced through approval of a Minor Exception or a Conditional Use Permit.As previously identified,a Minor Exception application addresses up to a 25%proposed reduction on on-site parking,and a Conditional Use Permit would be applicable to reductions proposed in excess of 25%.This development application (DRC2016-00006)Is the last major project of this type In the processing stream requesting a parking reduction from current parking standards.As discussed above,during the next phase of establishing Mixed Use (MU)District development standards (Phase II),the Planning Department staff will be establishing parking standards applicable to this type of development that will eliminate the need for future applications to request a modification in on-site parking requirements. J-Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007;The Arborist Report (Arborist Services, December2,2015)evaluated a total of62 trees onthe projectsite whose location conflicts with project Improvements:3ofthese treesmeetthe Development Code criteria for height and trunk dimension to be considered "heritage trees".The Development Code defines heritage trees as "all eucalyptus windrows,any tree in excess of thirty feet (30")in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20")or more or a multi-trunk having a diameter of thirty inches (30")or more." The Arborist Report evaluated the location and condition of all trees on-site including 9 Magnolia {Magnolia grandiflora),25 Queen Palm {Syagrus romanzoffianum),1 European Olive (O/ea europaea),11 Camphor {Cinnamomum camphora), 8 Tree of Heaven {Ailanthus altissima),3 Mexican Fan Palm {Washingtonia robusta),and 5 Evergreen Ash [Fraxinus uhdei).Most ofthe 62trees on-site are in averageto below average condition,several are dead, and the location of all trees conflict with proposed improvements. All 3trees thatmeetthe height and dimension criteria for heritage trees (Tree of Heaven)were not planted as partofa project,butare presumedto be seeded by birds and are considered a weed.The Landscape Plan demonstrates thatthe62trees removed as part of this project will be replaced with a variety of 36-inch box,24-inch box,and 15-gallon size trees. Based on Development Code standards for tree plantings a total of 163 trees are required for the project, B,CD10 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 11 and the Landscape Plan (Exhibit F) proposes planting trees throughout the project site to address this requirement. K.Neighborhood Meeting:A neighborhood meeting was conducted togather input and comments from the owners ofthe surrounding properties located within 660feet ofthe project site.This meeting was held on June 6, 2016 at the Four Points by Sheraton hotel,located at 11960 Foothill Boulevard.Approximately four adjacent property owners attended the meeting and asked questions regarding the timing of construction,access,parking,privacy,etc.The applicant provided an overview ofthe project and informed the residents of the anticipated construction schedule,project access,on-site parking,and how the project was designed to provide privacy to adjacent residences.No additional question were received. L.Design Review Committee:The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher,Oaxaca,and Smith)on July 5,2016.The Committee recommended approval ofthe project as submitted. 1^-AB52 Tribal Consultation:Pursuant to AB52,the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the San Manual Band of Mission Indians on February 4,2016.On February 9,2016,the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested additional information about the project site to determine if the area is sensitive for tribal cultural resources and if consultationis necessary. On February9, 2016, staff forwarded the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment totheSan Manuel Band of Mission Indians;no comments were received regarding that report. On March 3, 2016, staff received a letter from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians indicating that they do not have any specific concerns regarding known cultural resources in the specified areas that the project encompasses.On July 6,2016,the City submitted a Tribal Consultation Request to the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians;no response was received during the notification period. A Cultural Resources Assessment (BonTerra Psomas,December 7,2015)was prepared for the project site,which concluded that the property has notbeenthesubjectofan archaeological investigation andthere are no cultural resource records for the property.A mitigation measure is included in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan requiring that the applicant permit Native American monitoring of the project during ground disturbance,and any trenching below the initial grade level,to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study. N.Environmental Assessment:Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project.Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study,City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, agricultural resources,air quality,biological resources,cultural resources,geology and soils! greenhouse gas emissions,hydrology and water quality,and noise,there would be no substantial evidencethatthe project would havea significant effect onthe environment.Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.Thereafter,the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration.A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of,and compliance with,the mitigation measures for the project. B,C,D11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2016-00007.DRC2016-00007,AND DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26.2016 Page 12 CORRESPONDENCE This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper,the property was posted,and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot plus radius of the project site. Respectfulli^submltted, Candyce Burnett City Planner CB:TG/jy Attachments:Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Exhibit D Exhibit E Exhibit F Exhibit G Exhibit H Exhibit 1 Exhibit J Exhibit K Exhibit L Exhibit M Exhibit N Exhibit 0 Site Utilization Map Site Plan Conceptual Fire Access Plan Conceptual Open Space Plan Conceptual Grading Plan Preliminary Landscape Plan Fence and Wall Plan Building Floor Plans Unit Plans Elevations Perspective Renderings Parking Details/Carport Elevation Hermosa On-Street Parking Plan Design Review Committee Action, July 5,2016 Initial Study Parts I,II,and III Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2016-00006 Draft Resolution of Approval forTree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2016-00455 B,C,D12 T1 < r 3 H > CD n b OJ !:• MH 14-24^.^^ VACANT THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY U/04SASHi SAWiAX^STBKJ.CA tf.Wr •j-^-^g" RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA m y CO : LM 4^8 VACANT snr.iTiLi/Arn^N plan DRC 2016-00000 cm i-'iMiHeeB ILUMjt I«AU(II>iHk w. feKtV««tr£»a CVff4KRtlfeV£t CPfn A^UtwewM* i»» SITE UrtUZATION PLAN ARCHITECTS ORANGE SU-01 JD m X X U) CO n b ff t OVtALA.J-1 EMiXi AA .1.1,1.«l y Y .I,IY CARfUAGe *3 ]•M'JtCAIUHAU Y'/CAAiUAGr «iW «f»j -jj «1A^.fS /I Wtiri ari H J f • ••.•••I"••;•"•'••'-'''Ff•••---""^-f i'tS^ tSICf %.i i;im; 'FOOTHILLBLVD PFIOJECTSUMMARY ...A47A.. MA >l« 'twvwtrs ^ .pcriA 44r im amsai MCpvveprvru m uvtsi mvCMD UVf1 MMCn's a nnw*flF mtnm£n. »e»t>w *6hweawytie vUiMMC CMCIViM! OUILOff/G/UNfT MU MO SfTE DATA At \tq I A*i U IMtMtW It WMJi .iiW» Lf4SA£«.£OWrr SQ.Ft TOTALpu:LDtM SQ.H, WU.TOtM. wsr awtAO« 1 Horrwt.to^.WMTUUIAIIX JV fcMtf .m wuai iOif WAM JtiJi,MX.' PsUi A}(U 1ft 'M M ••A V yi.}}>ft 'fla' ^At M «aiM !•"VI«*>«-«»— »*«r.iM ,f K.''>4**2#»»a •» i'-.V • 0 3C'?•«* •1 J'«>«:;>.•)U 4 3.,," "X"~ k>>a^ai ,ttiWW/ ..•oeeieHiiw^e tiu :«. j *J •>«U.IU itx**M»tr m4jf 1 41 «w 1 rj)II II Itf Aww PARKING SUMUfARY fOTAL PAftlfJNG MFCMAFO luhirrrv*«e*UNa«^J4m (orr. [;:r 'j*' koiM UltfTl i4i •O f TOTAL fiAHnj^PR&VlOeO OTt-j % icuTofTi*— ro'At-MCi^w roT^t. 1 'y* »1 '\s-. "-rr'e^- tVT ^AAVrCO 1'IMS fifr % WiLCOM«u nw/a 'OUAtmMtfMAWf /Ml e/cyci£PARKING SlMMAfiY J *C<3mW9 ^|HO*T tUUI VMCOVCMfl MieIUCK&IJ \0»9JtKM lOCiw#U M*£tl 53 -7 IOr«.4» siTt pla:^LEOBUa i»f7 {ivxs,i^fnrs^)ti< n\ynf,c —- —A nH»CK i tffl <M» S J?t/WtWHi Ott-NPAifi^Ni:S 7yXlf r rAMWAIPAHnlMJ C CAfifOfil It S ALU aWKtf f H :fyX.tAH 3 c^cr/iti;Kfrnrur'oMffaw;.vm rirw o Off anxt f nermoMPAftKi.^-/\ 0 30'60' r =3D'-0' A-101 THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURAL SITEPLAN ~ FORE PROPERTY COMPANY IXh&WlA DAKHMiAKIKi.ft S«.VM/MWS4«4 CA $3101 S0Hi>SS3U ARCHITECTS ORANGE 144 SOfiTH QftAt^Ge ST.OPAkCi.CAUfOHStA mU (7f4)€39'9SfO m X w H O CD n b .SSIAC'ASi;.. CIlJKli ASM* 1 r - •^;i ,r|• , .• !CMfieA.ii Lni >«J (iifky M aoiviLA^Q :rp -03':-.•" imc7:jd:rtijr±i FOOTHILL BLW' THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY iityAWJA mniM^aiKin awiAMnHAHA ca vjtni nos-neatu uixi m: UKI RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA FIREACCESS LECSfJD \^ '-'v r...\"J :r flif. vfjHViM:rrt? .eiMPfNLiNinwf^ mm <IKJ«VS •e.MlftAi < •A-102030'CO-90 V =30--Q- CONCEPTUAL f/REACCESS SITE PLAN ARCHITECTS ORANGE U4fiQ9JH0RAflGe ST OPANCE CAi'POttSlA /)HlS^i'98S0 m X I UJ CD n b its 1 iisiLaslm: i FOOTHILL BLVD THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY /OCMMWM fSARHAJlA HIKITI fM/VM/MWM/M SJWI jUavMAJM RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA npF.nsl>^ct:Rnawneo lOanotfc^mwcgMflWtojfiw^flr cauuaN oeen sPACe PBOVroFO }5 ^^11*, ^*NS.tf7.V{ne7*7'^'S - H't.i aa 3U4 •CO'W JMS p'V <ioe*iic»r<im»eAfc«rei4ix-.*i--.}«J4« OPfN SPACf PHOWPPn mt';v5aVit';xyOTlli: "•OAT,'•i"*•n ••I* VH «<*!*.••T*. P XM'.MQM'V r;MC --i- t »{ 143 laws ronii opgw.spjcf pwowfifj) *3W&.U .S.-.W 3;>e 0.4 1 U«*l JfOfM Wi.JlJ*i «b>1 1«7W •A-10303D'50'a?' 1'=3D'-0' CONCEPTUAL OPEN SPACE PLAN - ARCHITECTS ORANGE uiNOHiHOH'WSfsi ORAhoi CAiirontu e?iei /rnjgiMsts m X I GO H m CO n b •vj u- 1 4 !,v "—-'V fw-'c ''h --u.'-LTr rn 'i'i tiyz •' Hir SEE SHEET CC;02 ^'•^-^~J .i'-y:K •v.wC'•-'•-'•^ I -^•- .|°7^e" i,i;::^t-,..^r:;,:nv^»iifJir''»^f "i •r ' *)\I (—- i,r~~1 1 M <t> f',I,r >1 k ,• l-'t 'j T' r i K'j'S'iif V B i:-2 _ J 'H*..f—^<•»I "pjv -3 on • •.^:TTTT ! L"J-r -'^:-"=•>»^r i 6^--rri-jy ij' .~t|i.T >v'"f"w •.im ••'z.-wd ^y":-rr.:|S: L •-7 -^ I •^-!>,I —pt-iaisj--:£J-t &TA3'S^*^II •ii .»'\ -l Jwn?^ih.= y'^:i'"r I FOOTHILL BOULEVARD BUILDING THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA FORE PROPERTY COMPANY JOOiSANTA BAHH*MS1Heer,liAMTA&Vi&»t*.CA.t:<m aXh4!fi-t3*4 i'/ sww yczyz — fAfUHA-ONK OU«HIII(PS. CML EIIGIHEEII mutMt •Au0usn%Mc. OWNER/DEVELOPER IfTUTCSCOtFAME® »'tt»/ ,-V k '!•iS-%*, -1^.- . . '•.j •'. 54S 'lU'-OM CUki i«3ui-vwCA»rtisii c,»jct>«'w o«-ot«SA«kiw,yn C'OW^l-FrUAL (JRADtNC;PLAN' DRC 20 [6-00006 IN nn.<Tt>(»iiANriiuni<-A.<.«NjiA.cy)irMYonsASM.RN*Kr>CM> VIAIL Of CAUIUKM^ V*f 1 11 V"»*1*W^Ul )/•o ltc-\*f J 17»At-OK'JJI CK<UlHt'J(IU..VI^ CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ARCHITECTS ORANGE lI'miKtnOfNGSST O.WCf,CMirOMU fim (/l'l«3?-SSS3 (jeCf^ijM0yrH I CG-01 m 00 n b 00 lU ZD LU —-"-t- ; <1- V (/): I n'!>'y/?',^1 ^iiSMji 5 •A « I EMEBMWT I iVSiWULlit ACCES3;_u ONLY ! -> •¥ / .^ ESTASIA STREET !\ t I •1 I k 111 STAFFORD STREET ensiwe houes ,1 i "I ^A-^ UJ-i j- fXISIWO MUSS **• ;*i '}l[J i|li|!i^^Ji ZZP^,,telTI Iir4l3 rc>-k^i -L ^'' 3 ilM C-;--•S5''5U";0? Pi M I 1^!;:M i I .'I --"-'v 1 *"< if'r,,—'".iVLJrnS.r«»!leiVSf V^.i . .I.—-Kr. "':—'"• :3»^3*w<> «X5 A ,£i 1 .• p i—S 1 w -I -I .''Ti f nri >>r~'J.""I'XT •"r~r™" H-* j 1- r'l T---'''ii, n s:3i i^K-'-'TLj^ I .^'"*1 '•" A3 •" s:: i —^ •roi5_i I -.J'-f^ i:' .» y V i I ^]'l| ^^;:i— W !t<^. M. i / rs? -^ti ,jji.aiafss-eL g U| SEE SHEET CG.Ol THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA FORE PROPERTY COMPANY ratMScvM tt<RaAft^swe£r.aAWMi!Artaw.cin»tfl;sowm-amj •(^ r;- =I 1 I a^5W »Rim,«a<c ouiNliriFS: CIVIL ENCIT^EER -I I r'.u.»I OWNEfl/DEVElOPER uTtrres ccwANB ••U»/£l»it- •J«T>«^<>Ari»iMfUSS»EV^M«<VWJ. CON'CI-n'lIAL GRADINC?PLAN DRC 2016-00006 IS iittiTnroFHA-vfnooiCflMaviA.cwMYOKiAfiPHiKwtnLso nAt I-Ut-CALUORMA -yc «IV w r/«<1 ttd uii<*«i.'i/«c*'•>'Ku^niii */•a i i.Tt AC 0IC05V CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ARCHITECTS ORANGE I'JHOPiHOKAMjssT-.oitiNoe.CMFOum*files i/ujfjMso ottiAii luy^rr*I CG-02 > m X I w C0 n b ^-dhar•VoK-.n-^ %iPn j KU. »««*<*•WVtl ftrA**»^AJCC v^ C (»K\I K n A/A THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY •(KUfWr/L «4flH*A'4'i'ffff r >•<St'JJ fUi £ s I roonHLL ftivo RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA r H l« Wr 1J||^S»». ^*W».Ujui aj (As*^ ,SCi/****•T »c .-.•*i ^»««»%' •!**--ti*^»«r •%,•. •*»«. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHITECTS ORANGE •a\~atH••'.j..;w^•«-.• L-1 .JD m X I Dd H :d OD n b NJ O i ^Mes<.c «00? 1 ".0 «->-•sCfcywAV e*est •ftsifi 6ixir'^Ai<£;»AT|*AM/ iU > r tLHM ^ Fli^"••4-1iiuii ilMIiMMil '••'•'iil'm-'iiii **"6 'r««t.t.6/1*£~»•SS*«- r] THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY 'ti: itdsr-m RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA -!'.'.::• Z**^«rvC*0^(4HM mVM.t mm 'ueuMc^ibu^aM^fk H?>.AJS(?VJ«^fun .iW«FT#WW4Vf*.i If •ifV:* FENCE AND WALL PLAN ARCHITECTS ORANGE L-2 ~JD m X X CD H X CD n b NJ rcan Lj^irTj-j^v-L GROUND FLOOR THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY m'JHA^IA M^tAStA^mtl /SANIAlUWIIA'V.I'A !'illll m SECOND FLOOR f. A'201 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,OA BUILDING TYPE 1 BUILDING PLANS ARCHITECTS ORANGE Ui HOfiTh 0>f*S\j^ST CKlfC.^KiA 'jSStS *^Ul (iM-9t6C CD n b ro NJ !r*i"?r Jrs!|Th!i1 HIRD FLOOR THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY .'rt'l.vWM IH'M/UM SUtH I VWM/MJ.'M/M rVA «/'• =d—CP" yiiS£E^_ FOURTH FLOOR r r -~u J 1 I ROOF FLOOR •n' 4J 1 A-202 RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA BUILDING TYPE 1 BUILDING PLANS ^ ARCHITECTS ORANGE = <11 •.CHlyOm^SS S7 OBtnOS.Pto'f '/lOlUS.JJoii U3 n o OJ • cio- GROUND L£VEL THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY inHSANIA MI!<IW,SlMf I 'iWIAMKMIM I'vl •.'Mill fenj^rtHIU y _/ ft TT U B4 n B4 r2>—G? ! •\—t r ^EC n N. UPPER LEVEL z: 0 3-16-24-A-203 1/3-^r-Q" RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA REMOTE CARRIAGE BUILDING PLANS ARCHITECTS ORANGE If hCirn ODisce sf ow«iS>,ctueoRi'iA 9:sst /juiejs-sisii X S CO n b NJ '•,:TT^r1 o-g M U-. ij-. ^••'i!^]y^ Ler^^Su ...m, X .M ':) ,1 .) -• -fQ "n •-1 THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY lUHSAMA MK'UWASIW f I VWM/MI.'MW I'A "'.W!fiftWf.i jJW A.-r:-. L-.i\ yr ,5 —-tn _^ 'Gi:- j3=L«b:£ «•*aM*•^'V'f X •-rxt ' -^-. -;a.•--r J i-- uiL 3J 7^.xuf-. ;™-K .EL I. .r-~\L^h]J.^rj ...—[}-..ti "t-••-L.-\-j ' r r T •-- .L ••~I DJ- ^1 toi TjinEi] i,T pXJ-t ., SCALC i/e'=r-o' t A-401 RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA UNIT PLANS ARCHITECTS ORANGE "t i>o'<yHoai>3!s!ontNO!cuecusiA p.>«s tll4|e3s•^Sl,^^ m X H 00 n "b ro Ln 11 m 11 m SI ;i a THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY FOOTHia BLVD ••di t HERWOSA AVFNUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA rir-i: • I p-tjt hi -VtfJ*.A •M «;m »• •.«<.'*•' •.1 Wy .•' >!.s'> n WAIN EWTRY CORNER .«>*>1 K !♦:> <«:•>»•'<* 1)^r-\fc 'utt HfMi «k*««.r: Mi'ii «vt*>•lliHJi'K i i aA «?«**><N;*;• CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION A-301 JD ARCHiTECTS ORANGE 00 n b rsj o% NORTH HI KVATION i II LAST ELfcVAriON THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY >.4%*4 rU.<MMd • .1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA »»•r*i k ^4,fA *7A 1>H' uv'ft ;VMrv*'AHr:i I .'Hf; ;C;.'.Ti » cyti>it i.t«g»io ••svv '!•"iV»-r. -NifAirii'nt'i'y- Cli'Vi ».»!>hAvi UKt iJSrt •«', H'-ArW ^fU.f!9tSA.*n.' A-301.1 >. ARCHITECTS ORANGE r V s4lr^r <..'A*',*.'vv-4 WATf Bl A.1 t l.r h."' smwr. sTiwr vLHCf.n 4 Mt-TAL HAILIN<i V VINVL WllNIXlW ::urTA,caiiopv bCOHt LINUS .L OHt^n SIltT'(• t A4iu:Hr;<sti<t»»KiM; I.oi iiH i nu' «'KW •ICS AKt'AlJL .VIlFn fi;btUn Rt'Aii!;*PEK^( Sf Mbr HAVb Hfcll y xvii eouK rcM ("iinNi- C :.«V eJJD T««:C'n»<bl Arjl IS (9]:s: RIGHT LEFT THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY HAHKiHASTHthy SA\fA t.4 v«M'HXU K- A ^• RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA [?:f T "V fC'l II ii • I ! I • I FRONT -t fi 0£ ml M •11 REAR A-301,2 REMOTE CARRIAGE BUILDING ELEVATIONS io ARCHITECTS ORANGE OD rv b NJ 00 © THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY /lAVHJrf.A.sWty.( m RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA lON/tOl. FOOTHILLBLVDELEVATION M A 1 E R I A 1.L fc:G f:N 0 X RIDING -iHiiivn •.Z:STUCCO .31 STONE VENEER t/ETAL RAH.ING VINyi WINDOW :i:il MCTAL CANOPY SCOr^E LINCS r-j:SCOi^tlD STUCCO >ALUMINUM STOf^Cr RONT •;U L U W L L ti t N U A;SW /100 AKCADE WHITE :r.:SW 6070 RCALi^T DCIOC :c;SW seap.rave «ed ;iv SW60a5 FOLKSrONL SW 6258 TRICORN OLACK A-302 MATERIALS AND COLORS ARCHITECTS ORANGE m CD CO n b NJ view A'B5F0Re THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY •nurAN'A H*UHA>h»s!in-l 's4VMH*««4V4 r.'4-.r. RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA tl£l» i NOmH T VIFWA FOOTHILL PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS ARCHITECTS ORANGE A-303 W n b OJ o VIEW B-BEFORE VIEW B-AFTER LOOKING WEST DOWN FOOTHILL BOULEVARD THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA MOniM .1 FOOTHtLL "VIF.WR PERSPECTIVE RENDERINGS ARCHITECTS ORANGE 'U *4!v'-.y4V •».'HVi-.t -4.''4 PI.' A'304 THE VINTNER ON FOOTHILL FORE PROPERTY COMPANY •OIIS'iMA RWlVlAStrrH I SMVIAIIAKIi/IM (V1 yi/l'l S'lWSi.'fllW TT J • CARPORT CLF.VAJIONS ^STANDARD GARAGE , (L L .<L RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA i-!'• f^TANOARD'HANntCAP CARPORT LAYOUT ^ STANOARD/HANDICAP PARKING LAYOUT ^ A-501 scA(i-i/8'=r-(r PARKING DETAILS ARCHITECTS ORANGE Ui SJ .ONANGS.f.AHrOHHiA n < r D H CJ b L J hJ *<6ff K CIIT (NCMTia underground Strvtet Alirl CALL TOLL TRCC BI1 1"'•''•^'[''..•.'i-r_•'- ""—5?""ff-'i pRopos^D'siffe--! nl.•-i '•V'i ' •I ..•'/'•'!•• .r»- - ;. • ,.\.' .o .': W 1 ••S3!—: i-;1; HERMOSAAVE L_j -!!"Ft.i 1'»•'.'I'i/J *t^'}I ejj \££l•tgrrre TfinnsL-T^m-f <?.t -f -^:--TCT;Tg-<^^;r-rac ""i ;••-•^•-.-c • N'"••' SIGNING A STRIPING NOTES ©—'Am*«*»4ia•!«#«w (i)—'—IV itfBOf cmhuhs 0Ei<>k *3«i «mT MU>MTt«Tiir§ tgA^—a^nVrtmaTCCMUMLmMOLAfCLtCPtHVO ^HM4 (•)—-*mrOOV«LBt«UOWU^L»<NBCA4ni*J(»StD.KM*7tA.OCT«A} CSV- // STAFFORD SFREEr DESCRIPTION ot REVISION CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA SIGNING ANO STRIPING PLAN HERMOSA AVENUE FROM FOOTHILL BLVD TO STAFFORD STREET now 201_X-_XXXXX ACl'MOvrD 0T DATE JMAW4 9IU>ED m,MAPQLE,, MCl Rancho CnCAMONGA The City of Rancho Cucamonga DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA JULYS,2016-7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California I.Call To Order Roll Call Regular Members:Richard Fletcher Candyce Burnett Francisco Oaxaca Donald Granger A Lou MunozAlternates;Ray Wimberly Rich Macias Additional Staff Present:Mike Smith.Senior Planner,Tom Grahn,Associate Planner II.PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee.State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda.The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. III.PROJECT REYIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes.Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal.The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable.The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. EXHIBIT N 1 of 2 B.C,D33 7:00 PM Rancho Ct'CA.VIONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA JULY 5,2016 A.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016- 00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to develop a 182- unit multi-family residential development on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU)District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN:1077-601-13.Related Files:Pre Application Review DRC2015-00802,Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007,and Minor Exception DRC2016-00455. B.TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES -A request to remove 62 trees related to the development of a 182-unit multi-family residential development on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU)District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN:1077-601-13.Related Files:Pre Application Review DRC2015-00802,Design Review DRC2016-00006. and Minor Exception DRC2016-00455. C.MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - A request to reduce on-site parking by 25 percent for the development of a 182-unit multi-family residential development on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN':1077-601-14. Related Files:Pre Application Review DRC2015-00802,Design Review DRC2016-00006,and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007. IV.Adjournment The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I,Jennifer Palacios,Office Specialist II with the Planning Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 23,2016,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga. 2 of 2 B,CD34 A, B, C.DRC2015' 00006 Committee recommended approval and forwarded project to PC. 8:00 P.M. RangHO CUCAMOXGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I -Initial Study) (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines;the California Environmental Quality Act;and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. it is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part 1 and the development application, additional information such as,but not limited to, traffic,noise,biological,drainage,and geological reports may be required.The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate.The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless ail required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the initial Study Part 11 as required by CEQA.In addition to the filing fee,the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents,officers,and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation,review,analysis,recommendations, mitigations,etc.,of any special studies or reports. GENERAL INFORMATION: INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED.Pledse notethatitisthe responsibility oftheapplicantto ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal;City staff will not be available to perform v/ork required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to v/hich this form pertains: DRC-2015-00802 The Vintner on Foothill Project Title: Name&Address ofproject Qv/ner(s): Samar A and Robin E.Lakkees,Nancy J.Shaffer Lakkees 10120 Foothill Blvd.,Rancho Cucamonga,OA 91730 Name&Address of developerorprojectsponsor:Jonathan Cornelius Fore Property Company,1004 Santa Barbara Street,Santa Barbara,CA 93101 (805)588-3355 Page 1 of 10 EXHIBIT O B,C,D35 Contact Person &Address:Chuck Buauet Charles Joseph Assciates,9581 Business Center Drive,Suite D,Rancho Cucamonga,OA 91730 Name &Address ofperson prepan'ng this form(ifdifferent from above): Same as above Telephone Number:909-481-1822 PROJECT INFORMATION &DESCRIPTION: Information indicated byan asterisk (') isnot required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1)Provide a full scale (8-1/2 x 11)copyofthe USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes theproject site,and indicate the site boundaries. 2)Provide a set ofcolorphotographsthatshow representative views into the site from the north,south,east, and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that sen/e the site;and representative views of significant features from the site.Include a map shov/ing location ofeach photograph. 3)Project Location (describe): NE Corner of Foothill Blvd.and Hermosa Avenue 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet ifnecessary): 1077-601-13-0000,1077-601-14-0000 '5)Gross Site Area (ac/sq.ft.): 4.78 acres '6) Net Site Area (totalsite size minus area ofpublic streets &proposed dedications): 4.55 acres 7)Describe anyproposedgeneralplanamendmentorzonechange which v/ould affect theprojectsite (attach additional sheet if necessary): None updated 4/11/2013 B,C.D36 Page 2 of 10 8) Include a description ofall permits which v/ill be necessary from the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga and othergovemmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Grading and Building Permits. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as itexists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads,drainage courses, and scenic aspects.Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition)and the use ofthe structures.Attach photographs of significant features described. Inaddition,cite all sources of information (i.e.. geologicaland/or hydrologic studies,bioticand archeological surveys,traffic studies): The project site is relatively flat and is already in an existing graded condition. The northern portion of the site is vacant and gently slopes to the southern portion of the Property.There are three existing buildings and asphalt parking lot areas that will be demolished.The existing buildings are a 2,400 square foot Liquor Store,a 4,629 square Toot motel and a vacant 7,yyb square Toot mgntciuD/restaurant ana win De aemoiisned In order to build the new proposed project updated 4/11/2013 Page3 of10 B,C,D37 10}Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects ofthe site. Cite all sources ofinformation (books,published reports and oral history): There are no known Cultural or Historical aspects to this site location. 11)Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site (aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and hov/they v^ill affect proposed uses: Existing roadway noise and short term construction noise. 12)Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that v/ill result from the proposed project.Indicate if there are proposed phases for development,the extent of development to occur v/ith each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment.Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: This mutil-family luxury apartment community is comprised of (1)4-story building and (5) remote carriage buildings,totaling 182 units,with 59%1-bedroom units,38%2-bedroom units 3%3-bedroom units.The project addresses the contemplated urban nature of the site by having Its principal boundaries front the project site edges along Foothill and Hermosa.Setbacks have reduced to 20'along Foothill and 15'along Hermosa to betterengage the streetscape.This architectural approach will bring a modern fresh look to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.Site amenities include 3,670 sf of Fitness and Clubhouse facilities,roof deck,bike storage and maintenance room,pet wash station,dog park and 15,400 sf of continuous pool and spa spac^ps. captured in the courtyard of the apartment building.We have strategically located (5)live/work (3,970 sf of Office/Retail)double volume units fronting Foothill Boulevard to create a distinguished urban presence. 13)Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects.Indicate the type ofland use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family,apartment houses, shops,department stores,etc.)and scale of development (height, frontage,setback,rear yard,etc.): Mnrfh-g^ingjg.Family RpQiHpnftal South-Foothill Blvd and Commercial-Retail Fagf Cnmmprnial/Mnlft-family Wfist Hprmnga Avphiip ?^ing(p Family RpgiHpntial/Rptail Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 B,C,D38 14)Will the proposed project change the pattern,scale,or character of tiie surrounding general areaof tiie project? The proposed Droiect will serve as an enhancement to th^surrounding area ofthe prnjp>pt 15)Indicate the typeof short-term and long-term noise tobe generated,including source and amount.Hov/will these noise levels affect adjacentproperties and on-slte uses?What methodsof soundproofing are proposed? Shorttermconstruction noise which will be mitigated as much as possible and will comply With all applicable noise controi requirements, '16)Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: Please refer to Andresen Arborist Services Report prepared by Steve F.Andrfissn, Certified Arborist in California #WC2170 with the International Society of Arboriculture, Dated 12/2/2015. 17)Indicateany bodies ofwater (including domesticwatersupplies)into which the site drains: None 18)Indicate expected amount of water usage.(See Attachment A for usage estimates).Forfurther clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Districtat (909) 987-2591. a.Residential (gal/day).46,592 Peakuse (gal/Day) b.Commercial/lnd.(gal/day/ac)5000 Peakuse (gal/min/ac) 19)Indicate proposed method ofsewage disposal.•Septic Tank Sewer XX ifseptic tanks are proposed,attach percolation tests.Ifdischarge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation:(See Attachment Afor usage estimates).Forfurther clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Distnct at (909) 987-2591. a.Residential (gal/day)34 ,58 0 b.Commercial/Industrial (gal/day/ac)174 Updated 4/11/2013 PageSoflO B,C,D39 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Numberofresidentialunits:182 Detached (indicate rangeofparcel sizes,minimum lotsizeand maximum lotsize:Multi-family, Attached (indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): Ail multi-famiiy units wiii be rentai and owned by the Fore Property Company 21)Anticipated range of sale pn'ces and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ n/a to S Rent (per month)S 150Q.0Q to S 2.700.00 Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: This project will have a total of 182 units. 106 one bedroom,70 two bedroom and 6 three bedroom. Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 1.25 for one bedroom,1.75 for two bedroom,3 for three bedrooms. 24)Indicate the expectednumberofschool children v/ho will be residing within theproject: ContacttheappropriateSchool Districts as shov/n in Attachment B: a.Elementary:2.36 b.Junior High:3.64 c.Senior High 2.73 COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS Describe type ofuse(s)and major function(s) of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: 3,970 sf Office/Retail and 3,670 sf of Fitness and Clubhouse Faciiities. updated 4/11/2013 Page6of10 B,C,D40 26j Total floor area of commercial,industrial,or institutional uses by type: 3,970 sf Retail/Office Use and 3,670 sf Fitness and Clubhouse Facilities. 27)Indicate hours of operation: Normal Business Hours subject to City Business License Criteria Clubhouse Facilities open &days a week 28)Number of employees:rote>;Unknown at this time. Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29)Provide breakdov/n of anticipatedjob classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): TBD Estimation of the number of v/orkers to be hired that currently reside in the City:unknown '31) For commercialand industrial uses only,indicate the source, type, and amount of airpollutionemissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast AirQuality Management District,at (818)572-6283): N/A,the LiveA/Vork units will not be a source of air pollution emissions. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and floodcontrolagencies sen/ing theprojectbeen contacted to detennine their ability toprovide adequate sen/ice to the proposed project?Ifso,please Indicate their response. All agencies contacted have indicated their ability to provide services. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 B,C,D41 33) In the knov/n history of this property,has there been any use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limitedto PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels, oils,solvents, and other flammableliquidsand gases.Alsonote underground storage ofany ofthe above. Please listthe materials and describe their use. storage, and/or discharge on the property,as v/ell as the dates of use. if known. None to our knowledge. 34)Will the proposed project involvethe temporary orlong-termuse. storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxicmaten'als, including but notlimitedto those examples listed above?Ifyes. provide an inventoryof allsuch materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The locationofsuch uses, along v/ith the storage and shipment areas,shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner v/ill confirm which fees 'apply tothis project.All checksare tobe madepayabletothe Clerk oftheBoard Supen/isors and submitted tothe Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnishedabove and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluationofthisproject to the best ofmy ability,that the facts,statements,and infonvation presented are true and correct tothe best ofmyknowledgeand belief.Ifurtherunderstand that additional infonvation may be requiredtobe submittedbefore an adequate evaluation can be made by the City ofRancho Cucamonga. Dafe.'1-4-2016 Title:President updated 4/11/2013 Page8of 10 B,CD42 ATTACHMENT"A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family Multi-Family Neighborhood Commercial General Commercial Office Professional Institutional/Government Industrial Park Large General industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) Sewer Flows Single-Family Multi-Family General Commercial Office Professional Industrial Park Large General Industrial Heavy Industrial (distribution) 705 gallons per EDU per day 256 gallons per EDU per day 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) 270 gallons per EDU per day 190 gallons per EDU per day 1900 gal/day/acre 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government 3000 gal/day/acre 2020 gal/day/acre 1863 gal/day/acre Source:Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering &l/VaferResoivrces Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 B,CD43 City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1.Project File: Development Review DRC2016-00006,Minor Exception DRC2016-00455,and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007. 2.Related Files:N/A 3. Description of Project:Tlie proposed developmentofa 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units) located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue. 4.Project Sponsor Name and Address: Chuck Buquet Charles Joseph Associates 9581 Business Center Drive,Suite D Rancho Cucamonga,CA91730 5.General Plan Designation:Mixed Use 6.Zoning:Mixed Use (MU) District 7.Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:The proposed projectsite is comprised oftwoparcels that make up a generally rectangular-shaped project area. The southerly half of the site contains a liquor store (Shop&Go),a short term hotel,and a closed night club (Rock the Keys);the northerly halfofthe site is vacant. The property to the north contains single-family homes; to the east is the Vlllaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633),and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has been used commercially;to the south isa multi-tenantoffice building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks); and to the west are commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound)and an older multi-family residential complex.The site slopes generally from north to south,and has nolandscapefeatures except for severaltrees located nearthe north property line and throughout the existing parking lot area. 8.Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 9.Contact Person and Phone Number: Tom Grahn,Associate Planner Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department (909)477-2750,extension 4312 10.Other agencies whose approval is required:None. GLOSSARY - The following abbreviations are used in this report: CALEEMOD -California Emissions Estimator Model CVWD-Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR -Environmental Impact Report B,C,D44 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006.DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 2 FEIR-Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR - Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES - National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx -Nitrogen Oxides ROG -Reactive Organic Gases PMi:-Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB -Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD -South Coast AirQuality Management District SWPPP -Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below v/ould be potentially affected by this project,involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact,""Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated."or"Less Than-Slgnificant-lmpact"as indicated bythe checklist onthe following pages. Aesthetics (^)Agricultural Resources (•^)Air Quality {^}Biological Resources (•/)Cultural Resources Geology &Soils {^)Greenhouse Gas Emissions ( )Hazards &Waste Materials {^)Hydrology &Water Quality ( )Land Use &Planning ( ) Mineral Resources )Noise ( )Population &Housing { )Public Services { )Recreation ( )TransportatlonrPraffic ( ) Utilities &Service Systems {'/)Mandatory Findings of Sipniflcance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) (^) ( ) () I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. A I find that although the proposed project could have a significanteffect on the environment,there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by. or agreed to, bythe project proponent,A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact"or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated"impact on the environment,but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlierdocument pursuanttoapplicablelegalstandard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) Ifindthat although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,because all potentially significant effects 1)have been analyzed adequately In an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuantto applicable standards,and2)have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR^ft^EGATIVE DECLARATION,including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon theproposed project,nothing further is required. Prepared By:. Reviewed By: Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D45 Date:4oiC/ /h-iDate: Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 3 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources;Potantially Significant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Imoact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1.AESTHETICS.Would the project: a)Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?0 0 0 (O b)Substantially damage scenic resources,including, but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic buildings within a Stale Scenic Highway? 0 0 0 (O c)Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? 0 0 0 (O d)Create a new source of substantial lightor glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? 0 0 (O 0 Comments; •a)There are no significant vistas withinor adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway.There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c)The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including5 live-workunits) on 4.55 acres ofland.The project site is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north, existing apartments to the east,and commercial development to the west and south. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project because the proposed project will remove an existing liquor store (Shop &Go), a short term hotel, and a closed nightclub (Rock the Keys) and develop the site with an apartment complex that is designed to meet the current development standards for the Mixed Use (MU)DistricL Foothill Boulevard is a Major Arterialand Hermosa Avenue is a Secondary arterial; missing right-of-way Improvements will be installed along both Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue. Since the project fronts onto Foothill Boulevard,improvements required by the Foothill Boulevard-Visual ImprovementPlan will be conditionedupon approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96,unless exempted by said Resolution.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity.The design and placement oflightfixtures require compliance withCity standards that require shielding,diffusing,or indirect lighting to avoid glare. AConceptual Photometric Exhibit was submitted by the applicant. On-site illumination levels (provided for parking,circulation,and pedestrian areas)complywith Development Code standards and will be shielded from adjacent properties.Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D46 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 4 Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Poten'.ia'Iy Sigriifican! lmo3Ct Less Than Significan! With Mitigation incorporated Less Than Significant imoait No 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES.Would the project: a)Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agrlcultural use? 0 0 (O 0 b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use,or a Williamson Act contract? 0 0 {)(^) c)Conflict with existing zoning for,or cause re-zoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g),timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526),or timbedand zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? 0 0 0 (O d)Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? 0 0 0 (O e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which,due to their location or nature,could result in conversion of Farmland,to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? 0 0 {)(^) Comments: Rev 9-29-15 The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands,Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units) on 4.55 acres of land.The project site is comprised of two parcels that make up a generally rectangular-shaped project area and is developed with residential and commercial land uses. The southerly half ofthesite contains a liquor store {Shop &Go),a short term hotel,anda closed night club (Rock the Keys);the northerly half of the site Is vacant. The project site is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north;the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633)and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has beenused commercially totheeast;a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks)tothe south;and commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound) and an older multi-family residential complex to the west.There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance,Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according tothe General Plan and the California DepartmentofConservation Farmland Map 2010.Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts ofthe City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial,residential,and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City Is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development.Further,a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres,and their economic viability is doubtful;therefore,they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan.The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted bythe City Council.The proposed project isconsistent with the General Planfor which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. B,C,D47 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Issues and Supporting Information Sources; City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 5 Potenlisily Significanl Impact Less Tfian SigniScar.l V/ith Mi'iigatisn Incorporated Less Iran Significanl Impact N3 Impact b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga.There are no WilliamsonAct contracts within the City.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use.Further,there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land,timberland,orTimberland Production.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland.Therefore no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion offorest land to non-forest use.Further,there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land,timberland,or Timberland Production.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed projectislocated at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevardand Hermosa Avenue. The 4.55 acre project site is comprised of two parcels that make up a generally rectangular-shaped project area. The southerly half of the site contains a liquor store (Shop &Go),a short term hotel,and a closed nightclub (Rockthe Keys);the northerlyhalf of the site Is vacant. The project site is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north;the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633)and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has been used commerciallyto the east;a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks)to the south;and commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound) and an older multi-family residential complex to the west.Furthermore,there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land and therefore,there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non- forest use.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3.AIR QUALITY.Would the project: a)Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? 0 0 0 (^) b)Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? 0 (^)0 C) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutantforwhich the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? 0 (O 0 0 d)Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? 0 (^)0 0 e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 0 0 0 (O Comments: a) Rev 9-29-15 As discussed in subsection b, the project would not exceed any air quality standards and would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality B,C,D48 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 6 Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Potentially S:gnificant Imoact Less Than Significant WitH Mitigation tncoroofated I.ess Ttian Significant Imcact No Iirpact b) Rev 9-29-15 standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts)or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions In the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP).Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP. Both the State of California and the Federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS)for seven air pollutants.These pollutants include ozone (O3),carbon monoxide (CO),nitrogen dioxide (NO2),sulfur dioxide (SO2),coarse particulate matter with a diameteror 10 microns orless (PM10),fine particulate matterless than 2.5 (PM25)microns in diameter and lead.Among these pollutants,ozone and particulate matter (PMio and PM25)are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects.In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates,hydrogen sulfide^(H2S),vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles.These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare ofthepopulace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area Is within the SouthCoast Air Basin,which Is under the iurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).The California Clean Air Act (CCAA)provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources.Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution.Examples of this include motor vehicles atan Intersection,a mall and on highways.SCAQMD also regulates stationary sources of pollution within a jurisdictional area.Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated bythe Air Resources Board (ARB). The combination of topography,low mixing height,abundant sunshine,and emissionsfrom the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation.The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (Increasing temperature with increasing altitude);this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds)limits the vertical dispersion ofair contaminants,holding them relatively nearthe ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA)of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)for six major pollutants,termed criteria pollutants: ozone (O3).coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10).fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5)microns in diameter,carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2),sulfur dioxide (SO2),and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health.Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment"or "non-attainment"depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS.Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA.The EPA has designated the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO)responsible forensuringthe Basin's compliance with the FCAA.The SouthCoast Air Basin is in Non-AttainmentStatus for Ozone,PM10 and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts ofa project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook.The criteria include daily emissions thresholds,compliance with State and national air quality standards,and consistency with the current AQMP.As prescribed by SCAQMD,an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (RK Engineering Group,Inc.,December 7,2014)was B,C,D49 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 7 Less Tl".an Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Potaai'ally Sigmfcant With Mitigstion Tnan Sigrificsnl No Imoazi Inccpcra'.sd Impacl Impa:' Rev 9-29-15 prepared ttiat utilizes CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2)to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds,long- term operational emissions,operation emissions for localized significant thresholds,and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Short Term (Construction):Project Emissions and impacts The project proposes the development of a 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-workunits) on 4.55 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU)District, The potential emissions associated with construction of the project are described in the following sections. Summarv of Peak Construction Emissions (Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions and Regional Thresholds^ Regional Significance -Construction Emis-sions Activity voc MO,CO so.PM,o PM^.5 [^fn--ciition 4 45 3-1 ?i5 20 0 04 235 2 04 Siti Pfsparstion -193 53:07 41 3?OOS •1 15 3 24 Gfcidir.;!:•51 36 05 25 26 0 03 2 55 2 13 Eu !d ':<)Lonjtfurti.jn 4 09 3041 ?.2 zA 0.05 3 S5 2 2£ Pa'/ing 2 02 17 23 55 ?0 002 1 09 0 90 Afchiiectu'ai Coating 39 13 2 16 ?S3 001 051 C 25 Maomjm 51 15 5."!07 41 i7 0 Co 4 15 3 24 SC';Q!v!D Th-eshoy 75 550 150 150 55 E.'Crted:.Thfrsholcl (?)Mo rio rio No No rio Construction activities associated with the project will result in emissions of CO,VOCs, NOx,SOx,PMio and PM25 and are expected from the following construction activities: demolition, grading (including soil import/export), building construction,painting (architectural coatings),paving (curb, gutter,and flatwork),and construction worker commuting. Localized Significance Summary in Pounds Per Day (Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions and LSTs) Construction Localized Significance CO NOx PMjs LST Pollutants (Ibtfday)(!bs/day)(Ibs/day)(lbs/day) On-site Emissioni 41 37 55.07 ^15 3 24 5CAQMD Construction Threshold 1,232 170 6 5 Exceeds Threshold.'?)No No No No B,C,D50 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006.DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 8 Less Than Potentially Significant Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:With Miiigaiisn Tnan Significant Na lrroa:t Incoroorated Impact Imosct Rev 9-29-15 EQuioment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading,utility engines,on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles,asphalt paving,and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew.Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on site would result in localized exhaust emissions: however,as shown in the tables above,the amount will notexceed any Local Significance Threshold. Fuoitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions associated with land clearing and exposure ofsoils tothe air and wind,and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity,the specific operations taking place,the equipment being operated,local soils,weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. Architectural Coatings Architectural coalings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the O3 precursors. Based on the proposed project,it is estimated that the proposed project will result in a maximum of approximately 61.19 lbs of VOC per day (combined for all construction sources)during construction.Therefore,this VOC emission is the principal airemissionand is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of75 lbs/day. Odors Heavy-dutyequipment inthe projectarea duringconstruction wouldemitodors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No othersources of objectionable odorshave been identified fortheproposed project,and no mitigation measures are required.In compliance with SCAQMD Rule402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health riskto potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurrina Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County and it is not among thecounties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rockintheirsoils.In addition,there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found inthe project area.Therefore,the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestos (NOA)during project construction is small and less than significant. Based on the discussion above and with implementation of the following mitigation measures,short-term, construction impacts will be less-than-significant: B,C,D51 Initial Studyfor DRC2016-00006.DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 9 Less Than Significgnl Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources;Patan'.ialiy Significant VYitn Mitigation Than Significant No lmDa:t tncorcorated Irroa:!Imoact Rev 9-29-15 1) All clearing,grading,earth-moving,or excavation activities shall ceasewhen winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines In order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2)The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3)times daily during dry weather.Watering,with complete coverage of disturbed areas,shall occur at least three times a day,preferably in the midmorning,afternoon,and after work is done for the day. 3)The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. Cumulative Impacts;Short-Term Construction Emissions Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area,which already exceed Federal and State standards.During the construction phases of development,on-site stationary sources,heavy-duty construction vehicles,construction worker vehicles,and energy use will generate emissions.In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities.While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site,smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area.Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area.Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete.Nevertheless,fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed.The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR)analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City.Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates inTable 4.3-3 ofthe General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2),Ozone (O3}, and Particulate Matter (PM25 and PM10)would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable If they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-slgnificant.This city-wide increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. Based on the AirQualityand Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (RKEngineering Group, Inc., December 7,2014),no short-term,operational impacts would occur as a result of the project.Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance,the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. With implementation of the following best practices and mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize short- term air quality impacts,the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less-than- slgnificant: 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions.The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment Is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications.Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. B,C,D52 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006, DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 10 Less Tfian S-gnificart Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Paieni:aiJ/ Significant Wi!h M.agation Tnar, S'gnificafil N3 Imoact Inccrocated Impact Imoact Rev 9-29-15 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the Citydenoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use.Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeaslble for the project.Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 6)The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 7) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9)All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113.Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume,low-pressure spray. 10)All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally,contractors shall include the following provisions: •Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. •Pave or apply gravel to any on-slte haul roads. •Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. •Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. •Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established bythe City ifsilt Is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. •Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. •Maintain a minimum 24-Inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. B,C.D53 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 11 Less Tnan Sigriificar.t Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Po'enta'ty Significant VViuT Mitigslicn Tfian SigniSca'-.i Na lmca:t Incorcoraied Impact Imcact Rev 9-29-15 11)The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB))daily to reduce PMio emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 12)Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. Proiect Long Term (Operational)Emissions and Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources Involving any project-related changes.The proposed project would result in a net increase in the amount of development in the area;therefore,the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions.The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting In the buildings and at the parking area.As shown in the following tables,project implementation will not exceed any significance thresholds.No long-term,operational impacts will occur as a result of the project. Summary of Peak Operational Emissions Regional Significance -Operational Emissions (lbs/day) Activity voc NO,CO so.PM.o PMj.5 -.re3 SGur':«6 26 C IS !5 15 0 00 0 03 0 01 Energy Sour:-?:0 05 0 55 0 2A 0 00 0 04 0 04 Mc'tris Sou'ce:4 53 '3 05 52 81 0 15 0 54 2 7ii Total Artij Jciufl'ii -Ene'cy - r.'obils 11 51 13 7i)6-5 20 0 15 UOc 2 51 5CAQMC)Thr^G^old 75 leo 550 150 150 55 E/ceed;Threiholcl (?)No No No Mo Mo Mo Cumulative Impacts (Long Term/Operational Emissions) The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR)analyzed the potential impacts to air quality based on the future build out of the City.In the long-term, continued development would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore,all developments would be cumulatively significant ifthey cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a less-than-significant level.This City-wide Increase in emissions was identified as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement ofOverriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the Section 4.3 of the General Plan FPEIR. Based on the AirQualityand Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (RK Engineering Group, Inc., December 7, 2014), no long-term,operational impacts would occur as a result of the project.Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed any thresholds of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal.With Implementation of the following mitigation measures from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR that are designed to minimize long-term,operational air B,C,D54 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 12 Less Than Sign;f;car,t Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Patsniially Signifirari ^^:lg3a0^ Than Signfiiant No Impact incorcorated Imoact Imoact quality impacts,the project's contribution to cumulative impacts will be less-than- significant: 13) Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 14) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15)Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16)Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17)Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 19)Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03,and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 20)All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficlency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning,appliances,and water heaters. 21)All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. c) As noted in the GeneralPlan FEIR (Section 4.3),continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the RanchoCucamonga area, whichalready exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase inemissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. With implementation of mitigation measures listed in subsection b)above from the City's 2010 General Plan FPEIR.which are designed to minimize long-term,operational air qualityimpacts, cumulativeimpacts will be less-than-signiflcant. d) Sensitivereceptorsare defined as populations thatare more susceptibleto the effects of pollution than the population at large.The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors:long-term health care facilities,rehabilitation centers,convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools,playgrounds,child care centers,and athletic facilities.According to the SCAQMD,projects have the potential to create significant impacts ifthey are located within 1/4 mile ofsensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is not located within 1/4 mile ofa sensitive receptors.Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the RanchoCucamongaGeneral Plan. Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D55 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 13 Less Than Signincan!Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Potentially S'g-iificam V/i:n Miligation Tlian SigniSiant No IfTDs:!Incorcoratsd Irroact Imcact During construction,tiiere is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under subsection b above and the following mitigation measure will reduce any potential impact to less-than-significant levels. 22)All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices.Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e.fireplaces/hearths)in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Construction odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing,paintingand paving.These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly.Operational odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Odors from the proposed multi-family residential use would most likely be from activities such as cooking:however,these odors would be minimal and not considered to be significant, Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans,policies, or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? 0 (^)0 0 b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian,habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? 0 0 0 (O c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to,marsh, vernal pool,coastal,etc.) through direct removal,filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 0 0 0 (O d) Interfere substantially withthe movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 0 0 0 (^) e) Conflictwith any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? 0 0 0 (^} f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local,regional,or State habitat conservation plan? 0 0 0 (^) Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D56 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2G16-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Potenfa[ly Significant V/ith MitigaEion Than Significa.-il No Impact l.icorcorated Impact Imoact Comments: a) Rev 9-29-15 The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-story.182-unit multi-family apartment complex {including 5 live-work units)on 4.55 acresof land.The project site is comprised of two parcels that make up a generally rectangular-shaped project area and is developed with residential and commercial land uses.The southerly half of the site contains ,a liquor store {Shop &Go),a short term hotel,and a closed night club (Rock the Keys);the northerly half ofthesiteis vacant.The project siteis characterized by existing single-family homes to the north;the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex {DRC2006-00633) and an existing vacant single-family residentiai house that has been used commercially to the east; a multi-tenant office building and restaurant {Kick Back Jacks) tothe south;and commercial uses {Xtreme Autosound)and an older multi-family residential complex tothe west.The northerly portion of the site has been previously disrupted during the construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments and also by annual discing for weed abatement.According to the GeneralPlan Figure RC-4,and Section 4.4 ofthe General Plan FPEIR,the project siteis not within anarea of sensitive biological resources; therefore,development is not anticipated to adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because ofthe fact thatthe project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. A Nesting Bird Survey Report was prepared for the project site {Ecological Sciences.Inc., March 4,2016),which concluded that no active nests were observed and no diagnostic sign (feathers,pellets,fecal material,prey remains,etc.) of current nesting activities was detected during the survey,and that no native and/or non-native bird species recorded during the survey were currently utilizing the site for nesting.The contribution of the project to cumulative biological impacts is not expected to be cumulatively considerable as the project site is within an urban area, is relatively small, and is isolated from areas of better habitat.The Nesting Bird Survey Report did not identify the presence of burrowing owl activityduring the survey, however,due to the potential of the site to contain burrow sites and the ability of owls to begin using the site at any time,a preconstruction clearance survey is recommended prior to site disturbance.Thesitedoes contain a large number of maturetrees which havethe potential to provide nesting areas for migrating birds.To avoid any impact on nesting birds,it is recommended that a pre-construction nesting bird survey be conducted a maximum 3days prior to ground breaking activity to avoid impact to birds protected under the Fish and Game Code and the Migratory Bird Act. 1) Three days priortothe removal ofvegetation orground-disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be requiredto determinewhethernesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methodsthat either (a)theadultbirds havenotbegun egg-laying or incubation; or (b)the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of Independent survival.If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions,then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment ofthe young. If nests are discovered,they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffersetback, as determined bya qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction"area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.Once the B,C,D57 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006. DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Pcisntially SigaiScant With Mitigation Than Significant No Impaoi incorporated Imoact i.-npaot b) c) d) Rev 9-29-15 nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 2)Perform a Burrowing Ov\/l Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity.The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis.The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: •Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non-breeding Season Survey and Reports)of the CDFW Staff Report.Results of the pre-construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City.If the pre-construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site,then no further mitigation Is required.If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey,measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period.These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring.!f ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre-construction survey,the site shall be resurveyed for owls. •During the non-breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non-migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre-construction survey,burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. •During the avlan nesting season from February 1 through August 31,. if nests are discovered,they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.The temporary "no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed Its cycle,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.Once the nest cycle is complete and ail nestlings have fledged and have left the nest,construction in the area may resume. The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities and no riparian habitat exists on-site.As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. The Cityis primarily located inan urban area that does notcontain large, contiguous natural open space areas.Wildlife potentially may move through the north/south trending B,C,D58 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006.DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources;Potentially Significant With Mitigatian Than Significant No fmpa;t Incoroorated Impact Imcact tributaries in the northern portion of the Cityand withinthe Sphere of Influence.Therefore no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The Development Code defines heritage trees as all eucalyptus vvindrov\/s.any tree in excess of thirty feet (30')in height and having a single trunk with a diameter of twenty inches (20")or more or a multi-trunk having a diameter of thirty inches (30")or more. The Arborist Report (Arborist Services,December 2,2015)evaluated a total of 62 trees on the project site whose location conflicts with project improvements;3 of these trees meet the heightand dimension criteriaforheritage trees. The ArboristReport evaluated the location and condition of 9 Magnolia {Magnolia grandiflora),25 Queen Palm {Syagrus romanzoffianum),1 European Olive (0/ea europaea),11 Camphor {Cinnamomum camphora), 8 Tree of Heaven {Ailanthus altissima), 3 Mexican Fan Palm {Washingtonia robusta),and 5 Evergreen Ash [Fraxinus uhdef),a total of 62 trees. Most of the 62 trees on-site are in average to below average condition,several are dead, and all trees conflict with proposed improvements.All 3 trees that meet the height and dinnension criteria for heritagetrees (Tree ofHeaven)were notplanted as part ofa project, but are considered seeded by birds and are considered a weed. The impact of the removal of the trees will be mitigated by the Development Code requirement that require 1 tree for each 30 linear feet of building,1 tree for each 30 feet of interior property line, and 1 tree for each 3 parking spaces.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. f)Neitherthe City,nor the SOI,are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area.The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1.No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 5.CULTURAL RESOURCES.Would the project: a)Cause a substantial adverse change inthe significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? 0 0 0 {^) b)Cause a substantial adverse change inthe significance of an archeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? 0 (^)0 0 c)Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? 0 (^)0 0 d)Disturb any human remains,including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? C)0 0 (O e)Directly or indirectly affect a Native American tribal cultural resource? 0 i^)0 0 Comments: a) Rev 9-29-15 The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units)on 4.55 acres of land. The projectsite is comprised oftwoparcels that make upa generallyrectangular-shaped projectarea and is developed with residential and commercial land uses. The southerly halfofthe site contains a liquor store(Shop&Go),a shortterm hotel,anda closed night club (Rock the Keys);the northerly half ofthe site isvacant. The project site is characterized by existing single-family homes to the north; the Villagglo on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633) B,C,D59 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 17 Less Than SigniScan!Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Potenirally S'gnificsnt W'lh MitigaUoo Than Significan:N3 Impact Incorooraled Impact Impact b) Rev 9-29-15 and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has been used commercially to the east;a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks)to the south;and commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound)and an older multi-family residential complex to the west. A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (BonTerra Paomas,December 7,2015) evaluated the proposed project and found no records of any historical, cultural resource, archaeological,or paieontological investigations or resource records recorded on the property. Additionally there are no paieontological records previously recorded on or near the property.The field survey did not result in the discovery of any cultural resources.The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource"per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation).Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however,the Rancho Cucamonga area Is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR {Section 4.6).Construction activity, particularly grading,soil excavation,and compaction,could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources.A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (BonTerra Paomas,December 7, 2015)evaluated the proposed project and found no records of any historical, cultural resource,archaeological,or paieontological investigations or resource records recorded on the property.The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR)analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City.The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1)If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study.With the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: •Enact interim measures to protect undeslgnated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish Its archaeological value. •Consider establishing provisions to require Incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. •Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. •Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant,important,and unique prehistoric resources. Including but not limited to,avoiding archaeological sites,capping or covering sites with soil,planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. •Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory,evaluation,and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area.Submit one copy of the completed report with B,QD60 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 18 Lsis Tnan Pcientia'iy Significanl S'gmScant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:vr:n M.sgati'cn Than S-gnificanl M3 Imosci Incorporated Imoact I.Tioaci c) d) Rev 9-29-15 original illustrations,to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6)indicates thatthe Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan.According totheresearch performed atthe Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database,no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded w^ithin the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of- Influence,including the project site;however,the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources.The older alluvium,which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch ofthe Quaternary period,when the last "Ice Age"and theappearance of modern man occurred,may contain significant vertebrate fossils.The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the PublicSafety Elementofthe General Plan. A Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (BonTerra Paomas,December 7,2015)evaluated the proposed project and found no records of any historical,cultural resource,archaeological,or paleontological investigations or resource records recorded on the property,The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2)If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered beforeor during grading,the developer will retaina qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (I.e.,paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate.Where mitigation monitoring Is appropriate, the program must include,but not be limited to,the following measures; •Assign a paleontological monitor,trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. •Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage.If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should Immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. •Prepare,identify,and curate all recovered fossils for documentation inthe summary report and transfer to an appropriatedepository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga.Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. The proposed project is in anareathathas already been disturbed by grading,existing on- site and surrounding development.The site has been previously disrupted during agricultural useof the site,the construction of surrounding infrastructure and surrounding developments,and annual discing for weedabatement.No known religious orsacred sites exist within the project area.No evidence is in placetosuggestthe project sitehas been used for human burials.The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5)states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the B,C,D61 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources;Pctanialy Signifcani V/ith Mit;gaEtsn Than Significant rJa In^oact Incofpora'.sd Impact Irrcact County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.As adherence to State regulations is required for all development,no mitigation is required in the unlil<ely event human remains are discovered on-site.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) On February4,2016,per the requirements of AB52,the City submitted Tribal Consultation Requests to the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and the San Manual Band of Mission Indians. On February 9, 2016, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested additional information about the project site to determine if the area is sensitive for tribal cultural resources and if consultation is necessary.On February 9, 2016, staff forwarded the Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (BonTerra Paomas,December 7,201'5)to the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians; no comments were received regarding that report.On March 3,staff received a letter from the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians indicating that they do not have any specific concerns regarding known cultural resources in the specified areas that the project encompasses.On July 6,2016,the City submitted a Tribal Consultation Request to the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians;no response was received during the notification period.The following mitigation measure shall be implemented: 3)The applicant shall contact the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians to discuss monitoring of the project during ground disturbance,and any trenching below the initial grade level,to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study.The applicant shall submit the results of this consultation to the City prior to issuance of permits for grading of the site. 6.GEOLOGY AND SOILS.Would the project: a)Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the nsl<of loss,injury,or death involving: i)Rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the Stale Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. {)0 0 (O ii)Strong seismic ground shaking?0 0 0 (O iii)Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 0 (O iv)Landslides?0 0 0 (O b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?{)(^)0 {) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral spreading,subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? 0 0 0 Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D62 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 20 Issues and Supporting Information Sources:p3t5ntJ3:iy S-gr.iScaPt ImDac! Less Than Significant With Utigation incorQcrated Less Than Significan! IfToact No d) Be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),creating substantial risks to lifeor property? 0 0 0 (^) e) Have soils incapable ofadequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? 0 0 0 (O Comments: a) b) c) Rev 9-29-15 No known faults pass through thesiteand it isnot in an Earthquake Fault Zone, noris it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault,according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault (and Etiwanda Avenue Fault Scarp)lies approximately 1.0 mile northwest ofthe site,and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 4.0 miles north.These faults are both capable of producing Mw 6.0-7.0 earthquakes.Also,the San Jacinto fault,capable of producing up to Mw 7.5 earthquakes is about 16 miles northeasterly ofthe site andtheSan Andreas,capable of upto Mw 8.2earthquakes, isabout 18 miles northeasterly ofthesite. Eachofthese faults can produce strong ground shaking.Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. The Cityof Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR.The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling,and/or movement of on-site soils.The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April,which generates blowing sand and dust,and creates erosion problems.Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand,resulting in temporary problems ofdust control; however,development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in thearea as pavement,roads,buildings,and landscaping are established.Therefore,the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented toreduce impactsto less-than-significant levels: 1)The site shallbe treated with water orother soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PMio emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403or re-planted withdrought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established bythe Cityto reduce PMio emissions associated withvehicletracking ofsoil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3)Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. 4)Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7)indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SGIfor slope failure,landslides,and/or erosion.Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity,rain,or construction.The City Hillside B,C,D63 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Paten'ially Significant VYitn Mitiga'Jon Than Signcficsnl N3 Impait l.ncorpcrated Imoacl Impact Development Regulations proiiibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas.The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. d)The majority of Rancho Cucamonga,including the project site,is located on alluvial soil deposits.These types of soils are not considered to be expansive.Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam (HaC) Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3.These soils are typically found at the in the western section of the City and consist of light brownish gray coarse sandy loam on the surface,about 10 inches thick. With adherence to standard building techniques in accordance with the building code,no adverse impacts are anticipated. e)The project will connect to,and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal.No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed.No adverse impacts are anticipated. 7.GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.Would the project: a)Generate greenhouse gas emissions,either directly or indirectly,that may have a significant impact on the environment? 0 (^)0 0 b)Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? 0 0 (^)0 Comments: a) Rev 9-29-15 Regulations and Sianificance -The Federal government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act (92 Stat.601). In June of 2005,Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas (GHG)emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EG)S-3-05.The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010;GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and, GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.Additionally, on December 7,2009,the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a)of the Clean Air Act: (1) that GHGs endanger human health;and (2)that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean AirAct.The USEPA defines 6 key GHGs (carbon dioxide (CO2),methane (CH4),nitrous oxide (N20),hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),perfluorocarbons (PFCs),and sulfur hexafluorlde (SFe)).The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. The western states,including Arizona, California,.New Mexico,Oregon,Utah,and Washington,already experience hotter,drier climates.California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of 3 to 4 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32,determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in B,C,D64 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 22 Less Tnan Potdntiaily S'gTjrcait Signlficaat L9SS Issues and Supporting Information Sources;V/'ih Than S^gnifican!No Impact Incaraoraled Imoact l.-np3=t Rev 9-29-15 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency ofenergyuse. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure,and transltloning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-Stale)at 28 percent and Industrialat 20 percent.Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent,agricultural uses at6 percent,high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. Uis not anticipated that any single development project wouldhave a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissionsacross California,the United States,and the world to cumulatively contribute to global climate change.Therefore,consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan,the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking).The proposed project Is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB.In compliance with Senate Bill (SB)97 and CEQA,the project has been analyzed basedona qualitative analysis (CEQA 15064.4).Additionally,the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobileand light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations In the Basin. The stations closest to the project site arethe Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutants except PM10.PM25,and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station.The ambient air quality in the projectarea forCO,NO2,and SO2 are consistently belowthe relevantState and Federal standards(basedon ARB and EPA from 2007,2008,and 2009 readings).Ozone,PM10, and PM25 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Proiect Related Sources of GHG's -Basedon the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act,Appendix G.a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards,contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation,expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals ofthe community.However,neither the CEQA statutes,Office of Planning and Research (OPR)guidelines,northe draftproposed changes tothe CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance ora particular methodology for performing an impact analysis.Significance criteria are left tothe judgment and discretion ofthe Lead Agency. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has not adopted a threshold of significance for GHG emissions.However,a screening threshold of 3,000 MTC02e per yearis based upon South Coast Air Quality Management District staff's proposed GHG screening threshold for stationary sources emissions for non-industrial projects,as described inthe SCAQMD's Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold forStationarySources,Rules,and Plans. Project related GHG's would includeemissions fromdirect and indirect sources.Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (RK Engineering Group,Inc.,December B,C,D65 Initial Studyfor DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 23 Less Tnan Pcteqtiail/ S'gf.ifianl Significant With U!ig3'Jon Less Tnan S'gni^can!Issues and Supporting Information Sources:No Imoact Incorporalai lmD3:[Impact Rev 9-29-15 7,2014),total project related emissions would be 2,365 MTC02eq/year,as shown in the following table: Construction Gre-enhouse Gas Emissions Activity Emissions (PrITCOje) Onsit?Offsite Total Den-ol *.iDn 55 j 4 5>59 7 5 5 0 41 Gr.=i;i r.g 27 a 1 5 29 2 Corr.rja J7y-2P-3 1 56:1 2i-T.;21 3 1 f.-0 t Tola!-;ic.•ilOQ Av«rAy?d over 30 years :3 p 10.-:24 '< Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions During Operation Emtssion Source Emissions (NJTCOje)v/ifh Regulation A'sa Source 3 ! Enffcjy Sourct"363 6 Soj'ce ^J4^0 V/aite 4::i 1 Wa'.er £5 1 fOpe''ation.'2,340 9 ji/ttotia.'Conj^ruTT-Vi if.'etaaed o.30 veam 24 ^ Total Annual Emissions 2,365 As shown in the table, direct and indirect operational emissions associated with the project as compared to the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance of 3,000 MTC02e per year would result in a less than significant impact with respect to GHG emissions. Cumulative Short Term (Construction^GHG Emissions -The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5)indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators,workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment Is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2).The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition,grading and excavation. Construction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site.Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on site.The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2.Ch4,and N2O.CH4 isemitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Based on the AirQuality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (RK Engineering Group, Inc., December 7, 2014), no significant impacts to GHGs from short-term construction impacts B,C,D66 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 24 Less Than Potentially Significanl SigniPcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:With Mitigation Than Significant No IrrDact incoroora'.sd Impact fmoact Rev 9-29-15 would occur as a result ofthe project as shown in the table above. Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance,the project's contribution to cumulative impacts is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less thana significant short-term cumulative impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions,which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 ofthe 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 1) The project must comply with ail rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust Including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice dally or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures'specification. 3)Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5)Construction should be timed so as not to Interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6)Ridesharing and transit Incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational)GHG's Emissions -The primary source ofGHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motorvehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating,as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumedbythe proposed landuse development overa long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for "adequacy,completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure,"to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared.Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To dale,there is no established quantified GHG emission threshold. The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units)on 4.55 acres of land.The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation(morethan 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities).The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measuresto reduce GHG emission including:water efficient landscaping, shade trees,and walkways that provideaccessibilityto public sidewalks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The proposed project will incorporate several B,C,D67 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 25 Less Tftan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Potentially Significant With Mitigation inan Significant No Imsact Incorocratsd I'Uca:!Imoact Rev 9-29-15 design features including:water efficient landscaping,shade trees,and walkways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks.Additionally,the City Is participating in the development of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375. Based on the AirQualityand Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (RK Engineering Group, Inc., December 7, 2014), no significant impacts to GHGs from long-term,operational impacts would occur as a result of the project as shown in the table above.Because the project would result in minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's Interim threshold of significance, the project's contribution to cumulative impacts Is also considered minimal. The proposed project would have less than a significant long-term operational impact with implementation of the following enforceable actions, which are included as mitigation measures in accordance with Mitigation Measure 4.5-1 of the 2010 General Plan Update FPEIR: 7)Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally.Use "Green Building Materials"such as materials that are resource efficient,recycled and manufactured In an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC)materials. 8)Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: •Increased insulation. 9) • Limit air leakage through the structure. •Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows,space heating and cooling equipment,light fixtures,and appliances. •Landscape and develop site utilizing shade,prevailing winds and landscaping. •Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. •Install light colored "cool"roofs and cool pavements. •Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: •Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. •Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available or as required by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). B,C,D68 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006.DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 26 Ls33 Than Significant Lsss Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pater,ta;i/ Significant V/ilh f.Higation Than Signiflcan!No Imoacl incorporaied Impact Imosct Design building to be water efficient by Installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets,dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. •Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 10)Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste.Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste In public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) Noother applicable plans,policies,orregulations adopted forthe purpose ofreducingGHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update includes adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air PollutionControl Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies and Standard Conditions guide Infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections,re use and rehabilitation of existing structures,link transportation opportunities,promote development that is sensitive to natural resources and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes water efficient landscaping,shade trees, and wall<ways that provide accessibility to public sidewalks and therefore is consistent withthe sustainability and climate change policies of theGeneralPlan. TheGeneralPlan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzedthe impactsofGHG'sand determinedthat GHG emissionswouldbe cumulatively considerable,which would be a significant,unavoidable adverse cumulative impact.A Statement of Overriding Considerationswas ultimately adopted bythe City Council.Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Impact Study (RK Engineering Group,Inc., December 7,2014),no significant impactsto GHGs from short-term,constructionimpacts or long-term,operational impacts would occur as a result of the project.Because the project would result In minimal emissions that do not exceed the SCAQMD's interim threshold of significance,the project's contribution to GHGs from short-term construction and long-term operational cumulative impacts is also considered minimal, With implementation of the mitigation measures listed in subsection a), less than significant impacts wouldoccur as a result of the project. Inaddition, the proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by AB 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS,Wouldthe project: a)Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous materials? 0 0 0 (O b)Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 0 0 {)(O c)Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? 0 0 0 (^) Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D69 Initial Study for DRC20.16-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Ranclio Cucamonga Page 27 Issues and Supporting Information Sources; Potsnhaily Signiflcani Imoact Less Than Significani V/ilh Mitigation Incarpcrated Less Tnan Sigrifijant Impact N3 Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result, would It create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 0 0 0 (^) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or. where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working In the-project area? 0 0 {)(O f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 0 0 0 (^) g)Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 0 0 0 (O h)Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss. Injuryor death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? 0 0 0 (O Comments: a)Development witliin the City may utilize or generate hazardous materials or wastes.This is usually associated with individual households,small business operations,and maintenance activities like paints,cleaning solvents,fertilizers,and motor oil or through construction activities that would use paints, solvents, acids, curing compounds,grease, and oils.These materials would be stored and used at individual sites.The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-workunits) on 4.55 acres ofland. The project site Is characterized byexisting single- family homes to the north; the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633)and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has been used commercially to the east;a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks)to the south; and commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound) and an older multi-family residential complex to the west.The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Divisionthat is more comprehensive than any other in the State.The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.Compliance with Federal,State,and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-slgnificant.Therefore,no adverse impacts are expected. b)The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State,The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets Stale and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan.Compliance with Federal,State,and local regulations concerning the storage and Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D70 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006. DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 28 Less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Potentially Significant Wtn Mitigation Tnan Signilcar.i Na Imoact Inwraorated Imoact Imcact liandling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant.Therefore,no adverse impacts are expected. c) The project site is not located within %mile of a sensitive receptor.Typically,the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors, Therefore, no adverse Impacts are anticipated. d)The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site.Site inspections in February 2016 did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impact is anticipated. e) The site is located within an airport land use plan (the Ontario Airport Land Use CompatibilityPlan (ALUCP))according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1;however,the site is not within 2 miles ofa public airport.The project site is located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airportand is offset north of the flightpath. The project is compliant withthe height limits of the ALUCP. Acondition of approval will be included that requires real estate disclosures will be-provided statingthat the site is withinthe ALCUP.Therefore,no impact is anticipated. f)There are no private airstrips within the City.The nearest private airstrip.Cable Airport,is located approximately 2 and 1/2 miles to the west of the City'swesterly limits.Therefore, no impact is anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development.New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's EmergencyOperationPlan, whichis updated every 3 years, includes policiesand procedures to be administered by the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga inthe event ofa disaster. Because the project includes at least twopointsof public street access and is required to comply with allapplicable City codes,including local fire ordinances,no adverse impacts are anticipated. h)Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City;however,the proposed projectsiteIsnotlocated within a Very High FireHazardSeverityZone according to General Plan Figure PS-1.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 9.HYDROLOGY ANDWATER QUALITY.Would the project: a)Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? 0 (O 0 0 b)Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit inaquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level whichwould not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? 0 {)0 (O c)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner,which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? 0 0 0 (^) Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D71 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 29 Issues and Supporting Information Sources;Polentiaily Significant lmpa:t Less Than Significant V/lth Mitigation incofcofa'.ed Less Tnan Significant Imoact No Impact d)Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner,which would result in flooding on- or off-site? 0 0 0 (^) e)Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? 0 0 0 (O f)Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?0 0 0 (O g)Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? 0 0 0 (O h)Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would Impede or redirect flood flows? 0 0 0 (O i)Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, Including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? 0 0 0 (O J)Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow?0 0 0 (O Comments; Rev 9-29-15 Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems.The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act.The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an Industrial activity,requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit.The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB),through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB),Santa Ana Region,administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation,grading,excavating,or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment.Prior to commencement of construction of a project,a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI)to obtain coverage under the General Permit.The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities.Including site clearance and grading: •Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs)to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the Intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. •Perform inspections of all BMPs. B,C.D72 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Poteniial!/ Sign,Scan VVitn Mitigation Than S gnifican No Imcact Inccrpcra'sa ImDait Imoaci Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP.To comply with the NPDES, the project's construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities,and a Water Quality ManagementPlan (WQiVlP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff.The applicant has submitted a Preliminary WQMP (Madole &Associates,May 16, 2016), which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants,such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction.Runofffrom driveways,roads and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system.BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods.Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins,oil/grit separators,and porous pavement.Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials.Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system.The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1)Prior to issuance of grading permits,the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval,a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared,included Inthe Grading Plan,and Implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are Initiated through completion of grading.This Erosion Control Plan shall Include the following measures at a minimum:a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be Included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-slte or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there Is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction,to remove pollutants,street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5)Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOl)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (I.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Rev 9-29-15 B,CD73 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006, DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 31 Less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Polsniia'ty S'gnif.ianl VVilh MiligatiOfi Tnan Significant No Imcaci Incorpora'ad lmo3:t Irrpact Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post-Construction Operational: 6) Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), Including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2004. 7)Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides.Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth.Plans for these areas,including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years,shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD,approximately 35 percent ofthe City'swater is currently providedfrom water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource.The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies,nor will It Interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3.Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer,estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface.As noted inthe General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significantimpact.CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns,and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existingstorm drain facilities,which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of ail non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion.A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer priorto issuance of grading permits.Therefore,the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course ofany stream or river.All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. AGrading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits.Therefore,increase in runofffrom the site will not result inflooding on- or off-site.Therefore,no impacts are anticipated. Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D74 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006, DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 32 Less Than S^gniScani Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Pa!ent!3!ly Significant With Mitiga'jcr Thar SigniPca"*!N3 lmD3:t incorDora'.ed Imoact Imcact e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates,drainage patterns,and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site;however,all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows.The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits.Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site.Therefore,no impacts are anticipated. f)Grading activities associated v;ith the construction period could result In a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts.The site is for new development/significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply withthe National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. With implementation of the mitigation measures specified under subsection a),less than significant impacts are anticipated. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), Including a project description and Identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants Into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.The WQMP shall Identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2004. 9)Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOl)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 10) The developer shall Implement the BMPs Identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole &Associates,May 16, 2016) to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. g) The projectsite is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. i)The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improvedand provides an integrated approach forregional and local drainage flows.This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds,concrete-lined channels,and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D75 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 33 Less Tnan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources;Paten'.ially Significant Wiin Mitiga^on Than Significant Na Imoact Incoroorated Imoact Impact area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. anticipated. Therefore,no adverse impacts are There are no oceans,lakes,or reservoirs near the project site;therefore impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated.The Rancho Cucamonga'area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams.Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City,and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LANDUSE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a)Physically divide an established community?0 0 0 (O b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan,policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including,but not limited to, a general plan,specific plan,local coastal program,or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? 0 {)0 (O c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? 0 0 0 (>^) Comments: b) c) Rev 9-29-15 The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (Including5 live-workunits)on 4.55 acres ofland. The project site is characterized byexisting single-family homes tothe north; the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633)and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has been used commercially to the east;a multi-tenant officebuildingand restaurant (Kick Back Jacks)to the south; and commercial uses (XtremeAutosound) and an older multi-family residential complex to the west. The project Is designed consistent with the Mixed Use (MU) District development standards and will include elements that are consistent with surrounding development,thus becoming a part of the larger community.Additionally,the project site plan and architectural massing were designed to be sensitive to the existing single-family neighborhood to the north of the project site through the placement of the apartment building towards the southwest portion of the site and limiting structures within 100 feet of the north property line to a maximum height of 25 feet.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. The project site land use designation is MixedUse (MU)District. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area.According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources;therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent withthe General Plan Land Use Plan.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. B,C,D76 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006.DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 34 Issues and Supporting Information Sources:PDi5niia!ly Significant Imoact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorooratsd Less Than Significant Impact Na imnact 11.MINERAL RESOURCES.Would the project: a)Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? 0 0 0 (^) b)Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? 0 0 0 (^) Comments: a)The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. b)The site is not designated by the General Plan,Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1,as a valuable mineral resource recovery site.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. 12.NOISE.Would the project result in: a)Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? ()0 (^)() b)Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? 0 0 0 (^) c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 0 0 0 (^) d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 0 (^)0 0 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or. where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 0 0 0 (O f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 0 0 0 (O Comments: Rev 9-29-15 The project site Is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of FoothillBoulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4- story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units) on 4.55 acres of land. Due to the proximityof Foothill Boulevard a Noise Impact Study (RK Engineering Group,Inc.,December 2,2015)was prepared for the project site,which concluded that with the following mitigation measures,the noise impacts on the project will be less than significant. B.C.D77 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Potentially Significant Wrtn W;!;g3;;on Than Significant No Irroa:!Incoroofated Irrpact Impact Rev 9-29-15 Exterior: 1)Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2)During all project site excavation and grading,the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment,fixed or mobile,with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers'standards. 3)The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4)The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 5)The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 6)The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 7)Prior to the issuance of any grading plans,the applicant shall submit a construction-related noise mitigation plan for City Planner review and approval.This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 8)During construction,the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9)Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10)Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. 11)Locate heavy equipment behind purpose-build barriers when near the southern property line.The barriers can be constructed on the work site from common construction building material (plywood,block,stacks,or spoils)or the barriers can be constructed from commercial panels,which are lined with sound absorbing material to achieve the maximum shielding effect possible.To be effective,the length of the barrier should be greater than its height.The noise source should not be visible and the barrier should be located as close as possible to either the noise source or the receiver. 12)Locate construction equipment as far from the north and east property line as possible.The distance between a noise source and noise receiver can be B,C,D78 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 36 Lsss Tnan S^g^,'ca^t Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Wth f.lil'ga'Jon Tnan No ifTpast Incsrooratsd I.Tioacl Imcact b) c) d) Rev 9-29-15 considered a barrier as well.Doubling the distance from the noise source would lower noise levels by approximately 6 dBA. Interior: 13) All units facing roadways will require a windows closed condition with upgraded windows.Ail first and second patios and balconies will require a minimum noise barrier of 5.5 feet.All third and fourth floor patios and balconies will require a minimum noise barrier of 5.0 feet. 14)For proper acoustical performance,all exterior windows and doors, and slidingglass doors must havea positive seal and leaks/cracksmust bekept to a minimum. 15) To prevent sound leaks the following shall be provided: • On concrete slab,the first layer of5/8"gypsum board on the unit side should be sealed top and bottom with resilient caulk, as well as around the junction boxes. Window rough-in seams should be no greater than y4",and all seams should be caulked with resilient caulking. • Seal,caulk,gasket or weather-strip all joints and seams to eliminate air leakage through these assemblies.Includes around window and doorframes, at penetrations through walls,and all other openings in the building envelope. The normal operating uses associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground borne vibrations.Construction related vibration maycreate short term noiseand vibration impacts. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic.The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development ofa 4-story,182-unil multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units)on 4.55 acres of land.Becausethe project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic;it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12)indicates that during a construction phase,on-slte stationary sources,heavy-duty construction vehicles,and construction equipment,will generate noise exceeding City standards.The following measuresare provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 16)Construction or grading shallnottakeplace between the hoursof 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays.Including Saturday, or at any timeon Sunday or a national holiday. 17)Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified In Development Code Section 17.66.050,as measured at the B,C.D79 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Po:-jniiaily Signif.tant VYi;h Mi'jga'Jsn Than SigniScanl Mo Imoaci Incorooraied Imcact Imoaci property line.Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official.Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours;however,If noise levels exceed the above standards,then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official.If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 18) Haultruck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weekdays,including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday.Additionally,if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 dally trips (counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures.To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an airportland use plan and is not within 2 miles ofa public airport. The Project islocated approximately3 milesnortherlyofthe Ontario Airport and is offset north,of the flight path. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. f)The nearest private airstrip.Cable Airport,is located approximately 2 1/2 miles tothewest of the City'swesterly limits.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 13.POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a)Induce substantial population growth in an area,either directly (for example,by proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly (for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? 0 0 0 (^) b)Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 0 o 0 (^) c)Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? {)0 0 (O Comments: a) Rev 9-29-15 The project islocatedina predominantly developed area and will include the development ofa 4-story.182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units)on4.55 acres of land.Although the project will increase the population growth in the area there will be a less than significant impactas the project is consistent with the underlying Zoning and General Plan Designation which density was analyzed as part of the buildout in the General Plan FPEIR.Since the project is an infill project and surrounded by developed infrastructure,adequate schools and the utility capacities toserve the project,this minimal increase inpopulation is considered less than significant.Construction,activities at the site B,C,D80 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006.DRC2016-00455. and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 38 Less Tnan Poi3r;a'iy S^gniScant Significant V/ith Wiligation Lass Than SignificantIssuesandSupportingInformationSources:No Imc3ci Incorporalad Impact Imoact will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. b)The project site is underutilized and has a motel, liquor store,and a closed night club on less than half of the 4.55 acre project site.There may be the temporary displacement of households or residents during construction of new residential units.The displacement would be temporary and therefore,no adverse impact is expected. c)The project site is underutilized and has a motel, liquor store,and a closed night club on less than half of the 4.55 acre project site.There may be the temporary displacement of households or residents during construction of new residential units.The displacement would be temporary and therefore,no adverse impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES.Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of nev/ or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection?0 0 0 (O b)Police protection?0 {)0 (^) c)Schools?0 0 0 (O d)Parks?{)0 0 (O e)Other public facilities?0 0 0 (^) Comments: a) b) c) d) Rev 9-29-15 The project site,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue,would be served by Fire Station #172 at 9612 San Bernardino Road,located approximately 0.75 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service,which could cause the need to construct new facilities.Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Additional police protection is notrequired as the additionofthe project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. The site is in a developed area currently served by the Central School District and the Chaffey Joint Union HighSchool District.The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. The site is in a developed area,currently served by the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga.The nearest parl^,Church Street Park located at 10150-10152 Church Street,is located approximately 0.45 miles north of the project site. The project will not require the B,C,D81 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006.DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho CuQamonga Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Poianually Signileant W;h Wtiga'jon Than Significant No Imoa:!incorocraisd ImcsJt ImDacl construction of any new facilitiesor alteration ofany existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service,which could cause the need to construct new facilities.A standard condition ofapproval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities.The site is in a developing area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration ofany existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service,which could cause the need to construct new facilities.Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. Accordingto the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4,14),there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less than significant impact.Additionally,the Paul A.Blane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. 15.RECREATION.Would the project: a)Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 0 0 0 (O b) Does the project includerecreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? {)0 0 (O Comments: b) Rev 9-29-15 The site is in a developed area,currently served bythe City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park,Church Street Park located at 10150-10152 Church Street,is located approximately 0.45 miles north of the project site. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. The project does not include the development of new or the expansion of existing recreational facilities.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. B,CD82 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006.DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 40 Issues and Supporting Information Sources;Palsntisr/ S gnificanl Imoact Less Than Significant With MiL'ga'jon incorporatgd Less Than Signlflca-.i Irr.sact No Imoact 16.TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC.Wouldthe project: a)Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system,including but not limited to intersections,streets,highways and freeways,pedestrian and bicycle paths,and mass transit? C)0 {)(^) b)Conflict with an applicable congestion management program,including,but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures,or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? 0 0 0 (O c) Result ina change inair traffic patterns,including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? 0 0 0 (O d) Substantiallyincrease hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? 0 0 0 (O e) Result in inadequate emergency access?0 {)0 (O f)Conflict with adopted policies,plans,or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? 0 0 {)(^) Comments; Rev 9-29-15 The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units)on4.55 acres ofland. The projectsite ischaracterized by existing single-family homes to the north;the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633)and an existing vacant single-family residential house thathas been used commercially totheeast; a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks)to the south;and commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound)and an older multi-family residential complex tothe west.The proposed project is forecast to generate 93 trips in the a.m.peak hour,113 trips In the p.m.peak hour,and 1,210 daily trips.The existing uses generate35 trips in thea.m.peak hour,60 trips in the p.m.peak hour,and590 daily drips.Therefore,the project is anticipated to generate 58 net new trips during the a.m. peak hour,53 net new trips in the p.m.peak hour,and 613 net new daily trips (Translutions. Inc., May 11,2016),as shown inthe following table: B,C,D83 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancfio Cucamonga Page 41 Less Tnan Sigrificait Lsss Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Polsnt's'ly Significanl V/jlfi WiEigation Tnan Significan;No liT^cacl Incorporated Imoact Imoact Rev 9-29-15 mgamgrn t .fa ,,fob!4,'to,.jOidj.Tob!!MSi puturjUse Apirtirenis TrpGi'ei'aJcii r<:-T'.-i Ijj IiiC'j.4'i C:- 'V 7-1 53 c-ij C2:Co: 73 i'j '13 so; I2!C Ciirrert Usjs f.'otel 7---If ^a*^: T-C/j-e-sticp Uqiior Stora T-ii'ji'r'a'.-:'- Ti:ir *ota!Tiips fiom Enisling Uses ;n '5 ""fii ?s--T:r IJX Ti- •:•»? 2 -i -v i-c 53':'?• •j -s :5 }2 17 35 •::5 c::c -* 3 J : I'rc 'Mi 11-2 2:;5 55 31 23 60 5c5 •5 2'5j 537 |loUTifp6efMnSoa9fetKwT^'Bm|U||n||i'^58 ••[e 11 "ai "J •««,'( .l-r.•iti -•..>>..1 '1()Vi'',iril II.'i'I •tv.:«>:'Vi''ri ;i.i-iV^iVH'' 'T'J-i'-'iVr airi -.vj \'""vn'*•'t''"•J''''.'•ir t J'"r A'.i s •!•-i;;r--r tj -;i-.i ^C'i.'.'-j '.t .r ii«'i'/-:j-.-mi"' Under all existing and opening year scenarios,all intersections operate al satisfactory LOS C or better during the a.m.and p.m.peak hours.Under year 2035 scenarios,all intersections operate at satisfactory LOS C with the exception of the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue,which operates at LOS F in the p.m.peak hour.The level of service deficiency occurs in the "With Project"and "Without Project"conditions; however,project Improvements improve this intersection to LOS D.The City Engineer reviewed the traffic study submitted for the project (Translutions,Inc., May 11,2016)and concurs with the report's findings. Existing Levels of Service r.«iilniwIii'JB. 1 HoRr<«aAvenue<Pici«rtnv«'*3v J 2 HKtT:>.$a Artrufar-y,!/!;!!E'x;!^va.l •^Fiijer.l 2rcclhfl e'-uV;'.'i;d Naiss; TA'.-C :Tv,-'A;v ?if ti-fp.l --.rTfty.i 'i:'/#:^iV K-.VaV i =.?.54 'J ii'Xi U)3 I 'r AUPokltafilPilPediHw t An^tfaor pniPe^Hov^'Pr^ .8tntel^L.0biMDdiy 'LOS 'IJOS'j f 0^'LOS I.LIfc'&9^^L0S;a D TAV.:£rf/ir?cc>/SfWis OrA [1 ticnsi ?4f C 27 7 C 2i 7 f:27 9 C NO [1 T-ho 122 0 15.>Q t;o Openlno Year Levels of Service 1 Hritmcsa AvenuaFTt^ecl Onvs'ftT/1 2 HerrrCM A.enut/Fcolhill Boulevani 3 F?c)rtcl Driv?«.3v iFocihill &etle-;ar3 tHPakVia ^FUPetkHoir ,'AUPeditfow 'PUPetkKoor 'Ptcject CotM toa VOeby LOS {D^'LOS Defay;LOS'.tn^i D l/rSO Emercerc'i Accs^'i CnV [I ftcnal 24 8 C 286 0 253 C 238 C NO D Tm'.»2 3 B 15 4 C NO Nsits: •E'-^s.'jSisftss-a r.\sc-T*'.-iV3rStc-:M 'cTft'C ri5^::K'.i -ifyeHeai :'u tf.m a «vfr«'t B,C,D84 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Poter.iiail/ SgnificaK V/i-J". Wtgaaon Traa SigniPcart No impact Incorcoralea Impart t.Tioact b) c) d) Rev 9-29-15 Year 2035 Levels of Service ?^'e^TTX.4.•1 A.'t ij-.Fctlt'JI 1 ^rrr-f!Cr.?-AT,?•xth!: rt [1 [1 TAW 2'\1 n 1 28?t; i 1 tV34 F • 'c "2 •.*»''r/1 •.-/.vfc .PI •*;,-vH r .-f.»» Year 2035 With Project fWith Improvements)Levels of Service 1 t-:rT/LwA..>jrutr,rr:,«3E,";e-Ariy 1 '[) tt r V-'ifiC Piqf-il TvVS-: 1 1 2P.2 c eej F • 5 r; 27 <: It-C 407 D 24 S 1" -A A,:•(l/.-y rpwof -irnt-J i;i<'cj u ft v.y,-cft'-..-v-t The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street Improvements existing or included in project design.The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips,traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards.In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. In November 2004,San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share towardregional transportation improvement projects. On May 18,2005, the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP)Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. Thisproject will be required,as a condition ofapproval, to pay the adopted transportationdevelopmentfee prior to issuance of building permit.The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing.The project will not negatively impact the levelof service standards on adjacent arterials,The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb,gutter, and sidewalk)along the street frontage ofthe site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. Located approximately 3 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport,the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. The projectis inan area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site.The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming B,C,D85 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 City of Rancho Cucamonga Page 43 Less Than Pateniia'Iy Sigiificant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Witn Mitigation Tnan Sijnifica.'it Ma Impact Incorccralsd Impact Impact uses.The project will,therefore,not create a substantial increase In hazards because of a design feature. Therefore, noadverse impacts are anticipated. e)The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during construction and upon completion ofthe project and will therefore notcreate an inadequate emergency access,Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. f) The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-slory,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units)on4.55 acres of land.The project design provides typical features tosupport transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays,bicycle racks, carpool parking,etc.),including local infrastructure (e.g., streets,sidewalks,and traffic/pedestrian signals),level topography,supporting transportation,and vehicle trip reduction. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 17.UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? 0 0 0 (O b)Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 0 0 0 (O c)Require or result in the construction of new storm water 1 drainage facilities or expansion ofexisting facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? 0 0 0 d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources,or are new or expanded entitlements needed? 0 0 0 (^) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider,which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 0 0 0 (^) f)Beserved bya landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 0 0 0 (^) g) Comply with Federal,State,and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? 0 0 0 (O Comments; Rev 9-29-15 The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system,which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity issufficienttoexceed the additionaldevelopment within the western and southern areas of the City.The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for buildout of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the B,C,D86 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Pcrenta'!/ S:giificanl ln-.D3Cl Less Than Significari y/ith Miirgabon Inccroorated Less Tnsn Significant Ifpoact N3 Imoaci requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater.Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. b)The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system,which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario,neither of which is at capacity.The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. Aii runoff wiil be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities,which have been designed to handle the flows.A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance ofgrading permits.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. The project is served by the CVWD water system.There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated, e)The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system,which has waste treated by the inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario,neither of which Is at capacity. Therefore, no adverse impactsare anticipated. f)Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. g)This project complies with Federal,State,and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939.Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. c) d) 18.MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 0 (^)0 0 b)Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable?("Cumulatively considerable"means tliat the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? 0 0 0 (^) Rev 9-29-15 B.C,D87 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2Q16-00455, and DRC2016-00007 Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Page 45 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources:Potsnlia'ly Significanl With Mitigaticn Than S/gniflcanl No Irrpacl Incorporated Impact Imoacl c)Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (O Comments: b) Rev 9-29-15 The proposed project is located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and proposes the development of a 4-story.182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including 5 live-work units)on 4.55 acres ofland. The project site is comprised of two parcels that make upa generally rectangular-shaped project area and Is developed with residential and commercial land uses. The southerly half of the.slte contains a liquor store (Shop &Go),a short term hotel,and a closed night club (Rock the Keys);the northerly halfofthe site is vacant.The project site ischaracterizedby existing single-family homes to the north;the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633) and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has been used commercially to the east: a multi-tenantoffice building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks)to the south; and commercial uses (XtremeAutosound) and an older multi-family residential complex to the west.According to the General Plan Figure RC-4,and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR,the project site Is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development is not anticipated toadversely affectrare orendangered species ofplants or animals because of the fact that the project Is surrounded by urbanized land uses and Is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. A Nesting Bird Survey Report was prepared for the project site (Ecological Sciences,Inc.,March 4,2016),which concluded thatno active nests wereobservedand no diagnostic sign (feathers,pellets,fecal material, preyremains, etc.)ofcurrentnesting activities was detected during the survey,and that no native and/or non-native bird species recorded during the survey were currently utilizing thesite for nesting,The contribution ofthe project to cumulative biological impacts is not expected to be cumulatively considerable as the project site Is within an urban area,is relatively small,and Is isolated from areas of better habitat.The Nesting Bird Survey Report did not identify the presence of burrowing owl activity during the survey,however, due tothe potential ofthe siteto contain burrow sites and the ability of owls to begin using the site at any time,a preconstructlon clearance survey is recomrnended prior to site disturbance.Thesitedoes contain a largenumberofmaturetrees which havethe potential to provide nesting areas for migrating birds.To avoid any Impact on nesting birds,It is recommended thata pre-construction nesting bird surveybe conducted a maximum 3days priortoground breaking activity toavoid impacttobirds protected under the Fishand Game Code and the Migratory Bird Act.Mitigation measures have been added in the Biological Resources section of the study requiring the submission of a nesting bird survey and burrowing owl survey tothe Planning Department prior totheissuanceofa rough grading permit.No cultural resources are known to exist onthe site;however,in the unlikely event that archaeological and paleontologlcal resources are discovered during construction, mitigation measures are included to ensure proper handling and protection. If the proposed project were approved,then the applicant would be required to develop the site In accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification ofa Program FEIR,Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out In the City and Sphere-of-lnfluence.The City made findings that adoption ofthe General Plan would result In significant adverse effects to Aesthetics,Agriculture and Forest Resources,Air Quality,Climate Change and Mineral Resources.Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources;however,they would not reduce Impacts to less-than-significant levels.Assuch,the City adopteda Statementof Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update B,C.D88 Initial Study for DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455,Cityof Rancho Cucamonga and DRC2016-00007 Page 46 against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)).The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared forthe projectsit (Translutions,Inc.,May 11,2016)identifies that without project improvements the Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue Intersection will be at LOS F,and with improvements will improve to LOS D.These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation ofvaluable natural open space.With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations,no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c)Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directlyor Indirectly.The Initial Study Identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact and includes mitigation measures to reduce emission levels to a less than significantimpact on the environment (see Air Qualitysection above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures).Additionally,impacts resulting from air qualitywould be short- term and would cease once construction activities were completed. As prescribed by SCAQMD.an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas ImpactStudy (RK Engineering Group,Inc., December 7, 2014). This analysis concluded that because the on-site emissions are low, the emissions would not exceed the ambient air quality standards prescribed by the SCAQMD. The Initial Study Identified potentially significant Impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. A Noise Impact Study (RK Engineering Group. Inc., December 2,2015)was submitted for the project that reviewed the potential interior and exterior noise levels. The report concluded that with the proposed mitigation measures (see Noise section above for detailed analysis and mitigation measures),elevated interior and exterior noise levels created by adjacent roadways would be reduced to less than significant. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant tothe tiering,program EIR,or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D).The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed inthe following earlier document(s)pursuant to applicable legal standards,and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices,10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): {^)General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027,Certified May 19, 2010) (v^)General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027,Certified October 17, 2001) {•^)Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115,certified January 4,1989) TECHNICAL APPENDICES (^)Air Qualityand Greenhouse Gas ImpactStudy (RK Engineering Group,Inc.,December 7.2015) Arborist Report (Arborist Services,December 2, 2015) Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D89 Initial Studyfor DRC2016-00006,DRC2016-00455,City of Rancho Cucamonga and DRC2016-00007 Page 47 (^}Due-Diligence Geotechnical Assessment (Petra Geosciences,October 22, 2015) (.>^)Nesting Bird Survey (Ecological Services,Inc.,Marcti 2016) (^)Noise Impact Study (RK Engineering Group,Inc.,December2,2015) (^)Parking Analysis Memo (Linscott Law&Greenspan,May4,2015) (v^)Parking Analysis Memo -Peer Review (Nelson\Nygaard, July 5, 2016) (^)Phase 1 Cultural Resources Assessment (BonTerra Psomas,December 7, 2015) (^)Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (Advanced Environmental Concepts,Inc.,October 2015) i'^)Traffic Impact Analysis (Transolutions, Inc., May 11, 2016) Rev 9-29-15 B,C,D90 •t'c.I^F'^>."201g-0u00c.D'iCj2(j'o-LZA5z City of i^ancro Cu:^c.ncrQrj •..::"-^.C20*6>000Q7 Psge-lf. AP-^i.lCANT CcRTiFlCATiOM :•;r.3t :•:••;'li soplicaT,fo'ine .•yOjeci dfrs:.'be::if :i i iro'il Study i i Sl.C;.'El,-.a •hi'p'cpG55Ci riKigalon measures i ns.'s r=:.'s.5:;rs p?.'ri x -5-:ci-o'Cli-ezy ggrse to tne propose:'nr.g?.!r-n r.-jisu'es :o iic erfs-ri c '•:::.5i=r ir'-rri.=r"''i •vir'e ci^sriy .no si^rv^can:sn/.a'i'iroa-v.a'T^'c^ts •.vj;.-a occur ••r:cv .:a-!v s S or-^i.ire,—••[..Daie 07 •P^Jih^A/r•'I'.v •;?:!IT 3."i 1 .i'c: Rc'/9-29-15 B,C,D91 CO n b N) MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.:DRC2016-00006 Initial Study Prepared by:Tom Grahn,Associate Planner Applicant:Charles Joseph Associates Date:October 26,2016 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compllance Section -3 -Air-Quality Short Term (Construction)Emissions 1) All clearing,grading,earth-moving,or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. PD/BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 2)The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3)times daily during dry weather.Watering,with complete coverage of disturbed areas,shall occur at least three times a day,preferably in the midmorning,afternoon,and after work is done for the day. PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 3)The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 4)All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions.The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications.Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 5)Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use.Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project.Contractors shall also conform to any PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 Page 1 of 17 w n b ID LJ Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Wlonitorinq Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compliance construction measures Imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning staff. 6)The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 7)The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not In use. PD c Review of plans A/C 2/4 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted In SCAQMD Rule 1108. BO B Review of plans A/C 2 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113.Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume,low- pressure spray. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 10)All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403.Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: PD c Review of plans A/C 2/4 •Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. BO c Review of plans A/C 2/4 •Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO c Review of plans A/C 2/4 •Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. BO c Review of plans A/C 2/4 •Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. BO c Review of plans A/C 2/4 •Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. BO c Review of plans A 4 •Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City ifsilt Is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling.Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of BO c During construction A 4 Page 2 of 17 CO n b 4^ Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compliance construction. •Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. BO C During construction A 4 •l\/laintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. BO C During Construction A 4 11)The site shall be treated with vyater or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB))daily to reduce Particulate Matter PMio emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. BO C During construction A 4 12)Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. BO C During construction A 4 Long Term Emissions 13)Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsldes. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 14)Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. BO C "Review of plans A/C 2/4 15)Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 16)Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 17)Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 18)Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 19)Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03,and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Page 3 of 17 CO "n b Ln Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compliancc Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 20)All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low- polluting heating,air conditioning,appliances, and water heaters. PD C Review of plans D 2/3 21)All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. PD C Review of plans D 2/3 22) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445,Wood Burning Devices.Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2,5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e.fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9.2009. PD C Review of plans D 2/3 Page 4 of 17 00 n b Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Section 4 -Biological Resources 1)Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground-disturbing activities,a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non- invasive methods that either (a)the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation;or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival.If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions,then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non- raptor nests,and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests,during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered,they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.The temporary "no construction"area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest,construction in the area may resume. 2)Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is In conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW)and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity.The survey shall include a habitat assessment,survey and impact analysis.The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: Responsible for Monitoring PD PD Monitoring Frequency Page 5 of 17 Timing of Verification Review of plans Review of plans Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compliance 2/4 2/4 w n b Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys and Reports)of the CDFW Staff Report. Results of the pre-construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City.If the pre-construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required.If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey,measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period.These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring.If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre-construction survey,the site shall be resurveyed for owls. During the non-breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre-construction survey,burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows.Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist in coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered,they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Page 6 of 17 Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compltance 03 n b 00 Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Wlethod of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compliance setback,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.The temporary "no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest,construction in the area may resume. Section 5 -Cultural-Resources 1)If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study.With the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: \ •Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 •Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 •Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. PD/BO C Review of report A/D - 3/4 •Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant,important,and unique prehistoric resources,including but not limited to.avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil,planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. P/D B/C Review of Plans/Report During Construction A/D •Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 Page 7 of 17 Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compllance inventory,evaluation,and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area.Submit one copy of the completed report,with original illustrations,to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e.plant or animal fossils)are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study.The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (I.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate.Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include,but not be limited to,the following measures: PD B Review of report A/D 4 •Assign a paleontological monitor,trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. PD B Review of report A/D 4 •Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded,divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage.If construction personnel make the discovery,the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 •Prepare,identify,and curate all recovered fossils for documentation In the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e.,San Bernardino County Museum). PD D Review of report D 3 •Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga.Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San PD D Review of report D 3 Page 8 of 17 DO n b o o Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /initials Sanctions for Non-Compliance Bernardino County IVIuseum. 3)The applicant shall contact the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians to discuss monitoring of the project during ground disturbance,and any trenching below the initial grade level,to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study.The applicant shall submit the results of this consultation to the City prior to issuance of permits for grading of the site. PD B Review of plans C/D 2 Section-6 -Geolbgy and Soils 1)The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PMio emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. BO C During construction A 4 2)Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site.Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. BO C During construction A 4 3)Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. BO C During construction A 4 4)Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. BO C During construction A 4 Section 7 -Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cumulative Short Term (Construction)GHG Emissions 1)The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating BO C During construction A 4 Page 9 of 17 Mitigatton Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compliance the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2)The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures'specification. BO C During construction A 4 3)Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 80 C During construction A 4 4)Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible. BO C During construction A 4 5)Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. BO C During construction A 4 6)Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. BO C During construction A 4 Cumulative Long Term (Operational)GHG Emissions 7)Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally.Use "Green Building Materials"such as materials that are resource efficient,recycled and manufactured In an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC)materials. BO A During Construction C 2 8)Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: •Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. •Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows,space heating and cooling equipment,light fixtures,and appliances. •Landscape and developed site utilizing shade,prevailing winds,and landscaping. BO A During Construction C 2 Page 10 of 17 CD n b o NJ Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compllance •Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. •install light colored "cool"roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 9)Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: •Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. •Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. •Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets,and waterless urinals/water heaters. •Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. BO A During Construction C 2 10)Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste.Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas.Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. CE A Review of plans C 2 Section 9 -Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities' 1)Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval.Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Page 11 of 17 CO n b o OJ Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-CompliancG construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan,and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading.This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum:a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 3)During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 4)During construction,to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 5)Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e.,a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Post-Construction Operational Page 12 of 17 Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compllance 6)Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 7)Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides.Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years-to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth.Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years,shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Grading Activities 8)Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 9)Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOl)to comply witii obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination BO B/C/D Review of plans /VC 2/4 Page 13 of 17 CO n b o (-n Mitigation Measures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compllance System (NPDES)General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 10)The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole &Associates,May 16,2016)to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Section 12-Noise Exterior 1)Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. PD/BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 2) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment,fixed or mobile,with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers'standards. BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 3)The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the proiect site. BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 4)The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction- related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. BO B Review of plans A/C 2/4 5) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential CE B Review of plans D 2/4 Page 14 of 17 U3 n b o CT1 Mitigation IVIeasures No./ Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compliance areas to the extent feasible. 6)The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. PD/BO C Review of plans A 2/4 7)Prior to the issuance of any grading plans,the applicant shall submit a construction-related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval.This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. PD B Review of plans C 2/4 8)During construction,the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 10)Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 11)Locate heavy equipment behind purpose-build barriers when near the southern property line. The barriers can be constructed on the work site from common construction building material (plywood,block,stacks,or spoils)or the barriers can be constructed from commercial panels,which are lined with sound absorbing material to achieve the maximum shielding effect possible.To be effective,the length of the barrier should be greater than its height.The noise source should not be visible and the barrier should be located as close as possible to either the noise source or the receiver. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 12)Locate construction equipment as far from the north and east property line as possible.The distance between a noise source and noise receiver can be considered a barrier as well. Doubling the distance from the noise source would lower noise levels by approximately 6 dBA. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/4 Page 15 of 17 00 n b o •sj Mitigation Measures No./ Implementinc?Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compliance Interior 13)All units facing roadways will require a windows closed condition with upgraded windows.All first and second patios and balconies will require a minimum noise barrier of 5.5 feet.All third and fourth floor patios and balconies will require a minimum noise barrier of 5.0 feet. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/3 14)For proper acoustical performance,all exterior windows and doors,and sliding glass doors must have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum. PD B Review of plans A/C 2/3 15)To prevent sound leaks the following should be provided: BO B/C Review of plans A/C 2/3 •On concrete slab,the first layer of 5/8" gypsum board on the unit side should be sealed top and bottom with resilient caulk, as well as around the iunction boxes. 80 B/D Review of plans A/C 2/3 •Window rough-in seams should be no greater than Ya",and all seams should be caulked with resilient caulking. BO B/D Review of plans A/C 2/3 •Seal,caulk,gasket or weather-strip all joints and seams to eliminate air leakage through these assemblies.'Includes around window and doorframes,at penetrations through walls,and all other openings in the building envelope. BO B/D Review of plans fiJC 2/3 16)Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays,including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 17)Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050,as measured at the property line.Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050.Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official.Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours;however,if BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Page 16 of 17 00 n b o 00 Mitigation Measures No. / Implementing Action Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Verification Verified Date /Initials Sanctions for Non-Compliance noise levels exceed the above standards,then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 18) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays,including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 Kev to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD -Community Development Director or designee A -With Each New Development A -On-site inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD -Planning Director or designee B -Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit / Approval 2 -Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE - City Engineer or designee C -Throughout Construction C -Plan Check 3 -Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO - Building Official or designee D - On Completion D -Separate Submittal (Reports/Studies/Plans)4 -Stop Work Order PO -Police Captain or designee E -Operating 5 -Retain Deposit or Bonds FC -Fire Chief or designee 6 -Revoke CUP 7 -Citation Page 17 of 17 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.:Development Review DRC2016-00006,Minor Exception DRC2016-00455,and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007. Public Review Period Closes:October 26,2016 Project Name:The Vintner on Footliill Project Applicant:Chuck Buquet/Charles Joseph Associates Project Location (also see attached map):The northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue -APN 1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14. Project Description:Development of a 4-story,182-unit multi-family apartment complex (including - live-work units) on 4.78 acres in the Mixed Use (MU)District. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1)Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur,and (2)There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project,as revised,may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study.The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909)477-2750 or Fax (909)477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period." October 26.2016 Date of Determination Adopted By B,C,D109 RESOLUTION NO.16-49 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;CALIFORNIA.APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006.A REQUEST TO DEVELOP A 182-UNIT MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING 5 LIVE-WORK UNITS) ON 4.78 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE (MU) DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HERMOSA AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN:APN:1077-601-13 AND 1077-601-14. A.Recitals. 1. The applicant.Charles Joseph Associates,filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2016-00006.as described in the title of this Resolution.Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th of October,2016,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3.AH legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE,it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 26,2016,including written and oral staff reports,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a.The application applies to approximately 4.78 acres of land,basically a rectangular configuration,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and is currently designated Mixed Use;and b.The project site is approximately 363 feet from east to west and 619 feet from north to south and the southerly half of the site contains a liquor store (Shop &Go), a motel (Motel 66), and a closed night club (Rock the Keys); the northerly half of the site is vacant;and c.The property to the north contains single-family homes;to the east Is the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633)and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has been used commercially:to the south is a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks);and to the west are commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound)and an older multi-family residential complex;and d.The project includes a related Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007,which proposes the removal of 62 trees whose location conflicts with proposed improvements,including 3 heritage trees (all Tree of Heaven);and B,C.D110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 2 e. The project includes a related Minor Exception DRC2016-00455,a proposal to reduce the required on-site parking by 95 parking spaces related to development of a 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units)on 4.78 acres of land;and f.The proposed project meets or exceeds all Development Code standards.As conditioned,the proposed apartment complex will meet all applicable Mixed Use (MU)District Development Code standards for multiple family residential development. 3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth In paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a.The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan;and b.The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located;and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code;and d.The proposed use,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4.Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto,and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a.Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project.Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study,City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures,there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment.Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.Thereafter,the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration;and b.The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and,based on the whole record before it.finds;(i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA;and (ii)that,based on the imposition of mitigation measures,there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration;and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public B,C,D111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 3 Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project;and d.The custodian of records for the Initial Study,Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based Is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730,telephone (909)477-2750. 5.Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2, 3,and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Conditions of Approval,attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality Short Term (Construction)Emissions 1) All clearing,grading,earth-moving,or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. 2)The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the Project are watered at least three (3)times daily during dry weather.Watering,with complete coverage of disturbed areas,shall occur at least three times a day,preferably in the midmorning,afternoon,and after work is done for the day. 3)The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less. 4) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions.The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications.Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits,the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use.Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project.Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. B,C,D112 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 4 6)The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel povi/ered equipment where feasible. 7)The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 8)All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 9)All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113.Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume,low-pressure spray. 10)All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally,contractors shall include the following provisions: e Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. •Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. •Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. •Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. •Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. •Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. •Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. •Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 11)The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB))daily to reduce PMio emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. B,C,D113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 5 12}Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all Inactive construction areas that remain Inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. Long Term Project Operational Impacts 13)Provide adequate Ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. 14)Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 15)Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 16)Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 17)Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 18)Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 19)Comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources PRC-03,and Stationary Sources Operations Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance and ADV-MISC to reduce emissions of restaurant operations. 20) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating,air conditioning, appliances,and water heaters. 21)All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 22)All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445,Wood Burning Devices.Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e.fireplaces/hearths)in new development on or after March 9,2009. Biological Resources 1)Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground-disturbing activities,a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring.Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a)the B,C,D114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 6 adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation;or (b)the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions,then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests,and within 5,000 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered,they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.The temporary "no construction"area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest,construction in the area may resume. 2)Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity.The survey shall include a habitat assessment,survey and Impact analysis.The Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow the following protocol: •Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on Appendix D (Breeding and Non-breeding Season Surveys and Reports)of the CDFW Staff Report.Results of the pre-construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If the pre-construction survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site,then no further mitigation is required.If burrowing owls are found to be utilizing the project site during the pre-construction survey,measures shall be developed by the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid Impacting occupied burrows during the nesting period.These measures shall be based on the most current CDFW protocols and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owlmonitoring. If ground-disturbing activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the pre-construction survey,the site shall be resurveyed for owls. • During the non-breeding season from September 1 through January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non-migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre- construction survey,burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used to exclude owls from those burrows.Burrow exclusion and/or closure should only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist In coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW guidelines. B,C,D115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26.2016 Page 7 «During the avian nesting season from February 1 through August 31, if nests are discovered,they shall be avoided through establishment of an appropriate buffer setback,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.The temporary "no construction"area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle,as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist.Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest,construction in the area may resume. Cultural Resources 1)If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study.Witii the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: •Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. •Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. •Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. •Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant,important,and unique prehistoric resources,including but not limited to,avoiding archaeological sites,capping or covering sites with soil,planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. •Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory,evaluation,and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area.Submit one copy of the completed report with original Illustrations,to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2)If any paleontological resource (i.e.plant or animal fossils)are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study.The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e.,paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate.Where B,C,D116 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26.2016 Page 8 mitigation monitoring is appropriate,the program must include,but not be limited to,the following measures: •Assign a paleontological monitor,trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. •Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage.If construction personnel make the discovery,the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. •Prepare,identify,and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e.,San Bernardino County Museum). •Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 3)The applicant shall contact the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians to discuss monitoring of the project during ground disturbance,and any trenching below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and preserved for study.The applicant shall submit the results of this consultation to the City prior to issuance of permits for grading of the site. Geology and Soils 1)The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PMio emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2)Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PMio emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3)Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMio emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMio emissions. B,C,D117 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26.2016 Page 9 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cumulative Short Term (Construction)GHG Emissions 1)The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2)The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures'specification. 3)Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4)Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5)Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6)Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Cumulative Long Term (Operational)GHG Emissions 7)Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials"such as materials that are resource efficient,recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic- compound (VOC)materials. 8)Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; •Increased insulation. • Limit air leakage through the structure. •Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows,space heating and cooling equipment,light fixtures,and appliances. •Landscape and develop site utilizing shade,prevailing winds and landscaping. •Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. B,C,D118 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 10 9 Install light colored "coor roofs and cool pavements. • Install solar or lightemitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 9)Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance withthe Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. «Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project ifavailable and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets,dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. •Design,irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 10)Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste.Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas.Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities 1)Priorto issuance ofgrading permits,the permitapplicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval,a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2)An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan,and implemented forthe proposed project that identifies specific measures to controlon-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion ofgrading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum:a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. B,C,D119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 11 3) During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction,to remove pollutants,street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.Evidence that this has been obtained (I.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Officialfor coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Post-Construction Operational 6) Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 7)Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides.Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth.Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years,shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 8) Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable.The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9)Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits,the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage B,C,D120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 12 under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board.Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 10)The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Madole &Associates, May 16,2016)to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Noise Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval.The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) During all project site excavation and grading,the project contractors shall equip all construction equipment,fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the manufacturers' standards. 3)The project contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 4) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 5) The construction contractor shall obtain the City's approval for its haul plan, with the planned haul truck routes avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible. 6) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the day. 7) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans,the applicant shall submit a construction-related noise mitigation plan for Planning Director review and approval. This plan shall depict the location of construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. B,C,D121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 13 8)During construction,the contractor shall ensure all construction equipment is equipped with appropriate noise attenuating devices. 9) Idling equipment shall be turned off when not in use. 10)Equipment shall be maintained so that vehicles and their loads are secured from rattling and banging. 11)Locate heavy equipment behind purpose-build barriers when near the southern property line.The barriers can be constructed on the work site from common construction building material (plywood, block,stacks,or spoils)or the barriers can be constructed from commercial panels,which are lined with sound absorbing material to achieve the maximum shielding effect possible.To be effective,the length of the barrier should be greater than its height.The noise source should not be visible and the barrier should be located as close as possible to either the noise source or the receiver. 12)Locate construction equipment as far from the north and east property line as possible.The distance between a noise source and noise receiver can be considered a barrier as well.Doubling the distance from the noise source would lower noise levels by approximately 6 dBA. Interior 13)All units facing roadways will require a windows closed condition with upgraded windows.All first and second patios and balconies will require a minimum noise barrier of 5.5 feet.All third and fourth floor patios and balconies will require a minimum noise barrier of 5.0 feet. 14)For proper acoustical performance,all exterior windows and doors, and sliding glass doors must have a positive seal and leaks/cracks must be kept to a minimum. 15) To prevent sound leaks the following shall be provided: • On concrete slab,the first layer of 5/8"gypsum board on the unit side should be sealed top and bottom with resilient caulk, as well as around the junction boxes. •Window rough-in seams should be no greater than Yi",and all seams should be caulked with resilient caulking. •Seal,caulk,gasket or weather-strip all joints and seams to eliminate air leakage through these assemblies.Includes around window and doorframes,at penetrations through walls, and all other openings in the building envelope. B,C,D122 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 14 16)Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m.on weel<days,including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 17)Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050,as measured at the property line.Developers shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050.Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official.Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours;however,if noise levels exceed the above standards,then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official.If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 18) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m.and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays,including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures.To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6.The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca,Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett,Secretary B,CD123 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-49 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00006 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 15 I,Candyce Burnett,Secretary of the Planning Commission of the Cityof Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October 2016,by the following vote-to-wit: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN:COMMISSIONERS: B,C,D124 Conditions of Approval C Community Development Department Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name;The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the follov/ing Special Conditions 1.Approval is for the development of a 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units) on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU)District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN:1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14. 2.Approval of this Design Review application is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00455. 3. A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to occupancy.The Parking Management Plan shall include, at a minimum,requirements that the use of the garages and carports will be strictly monitored.The City Planner may periodically review and require additional parking mitigation measures if It is determined that the on-site parking is inadequate to meet the project's ongoing parking demand. 4. On-street parking along the east side of Hermosa Avenue may be provided to support this Design Review application.The final design and number on-street parking spaces shall be subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval. 5.Demolition of the existing structures shall meet or exceed requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1403- Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities. Standard Conditions of Approval 6.All roof appurtenances,including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork,that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet,shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building.Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork,that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 7.Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures,including monitoring and reporting.Applicant shall be required to post cash,letter of credit,or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures.These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures.Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. www.CityofRC.us Printed 10/12/2016 B,C,D125 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.beyond final certificate of occupancy),the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of Building Permits.Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 9.The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,officers,or employees,because of the Issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval.The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents,officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents,officers,or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action.The City may, at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 10.Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval,Conditions of Approval,and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size).The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 11. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program -The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 12. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.25.All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 13. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 14. For multi-family residential development,property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site,as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way.All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition,and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing,and trimming. Any damaged,dead,diseased,or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 15. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan.Including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development,shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone,the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 16. Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/12/2016 Page2of15 B,C,D126 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name;The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,IVlinor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 17. The final design of the perimeter parkways,wails,landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 18.Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 19.All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment.If located in public maintenance areas,the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 20. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 21.The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes.Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting.The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22.All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 23.All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 24. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to Issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 25.All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. 26. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 27.The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval.Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval bythe PlanningDepartment prior to installation ofany signs. 28. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment,condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 29. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/12/2016 Page 3 of 15 B,C,D127 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007, DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 30. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances,and applicable Community,Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 31.All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, Including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. 32. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and Engineering Services Department approval;including,but not limited to, public notice requirements,special street posting,phone listing for community concerns,hours of construction activity,dust control measures,and security fencing. 33. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans,architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein,and Development Code regulations. 34. For multiple-family development,provide exterior lockable storage space as required by the California Green Building Code. 35.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers,etc.,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls,berming,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 36. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches,trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks,light bollards,etc.,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 37.All parkways,open areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City.Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 38. For multiple-family development,laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 39. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (909-477-2800)prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style,illumination,location,height,and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 40.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy,plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance.The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 10/12/2016 Page4of15 B,C,D128 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007, DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 41.All site,grading,landscape,irrigation,and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits {such as grading,tree removal,encroachment,building, etc.)or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 42. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 43. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter.If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall.Developer shall notify,by mail,all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 44.Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 45.Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall meet City standards.The final design,locations,and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 46. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1.Hermosa is a Secondary Arterial and will need to be widened to 32 feet from curb to centerline from Foothill to northern tract boundary.Dedicate the necessary right-of-way to the satisfaction of the city engineer. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 10/12/2016 Page 5 of 15 B,C,D129 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type; Design Review LotLine Adjustment,iVlinor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDmONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2.Hermosa Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary"standards as required and including: A. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, and driveway. B.Proposed driveway shall be for Emergency Vehicle Access only. Provide a Limited Access Curb per City Standard Plan 105-C to discourage potential residential access.Because the proposed driveway is Emergency Vehicle Access only, a median curb is not required along Hermosa Avenue. C.Provide signing and striping plans.In the future if the City determines that the Level of Service is unacceptable at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue, the City may remove on-street parking in order to add an additional northbound lane. D. Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights as required.Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. E.Relocate and modifytrafficsignal and related equipment as required. F.Revise signing and striping. 3.Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: A.Provide curb and gutter and sidewalk at the ultimate condition including, but not limited to, 1 left turn lane,3 travel lanes,and 1 bike lane. B.The driveway approach along Foothillshall be designed as far east as possible. C. Provide 16000 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights as required.Coordinate with City staff to design street lights. D.Provide signing and striping plans. E.Relocate and modify traffic signal and related equipment. F.Revise signing and striping. G.No median breaks on Foothill Boulevard. H.Parkway improvements shall be in conformance with the Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan,including streetlights and an in-lieu fee for special pavers within the intersection. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/12/2016 Page 6 of15 B,C.D130 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007.DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,IVIInor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4.Existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground on both streets along the entire frontage of the existing parcel per the Existing Overhead Utility Requirements Policy,prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy,whichever occurs first. 5.Hermosa striping must delineate parking stalls from travel lane.Provide signing and striping to guide traffic away from the first parking stall at the south end, and to guide traffic away from the protruding curb north of the project property line. 6.Development impact fees will be applied at the building permit. Note:fees are subject to change annually 7. The street lights shall be owned by the City.Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. standard Conditions of Approval 8. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 9. Easements for public sidewalks placedoutsidethe public right-of-way shallbe dedicatedto the City. 10. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. 11. Prior to the Issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit Is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2,2014,must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2,2014,require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement:a completed CD-2 form,a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets.Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us,under City Hall;Engineering; Environmental Programs. 12.A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 13.A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 14.Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees:"All improvements within the public right-of-way,including street trees,shall be installed per the public improvement plans."If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/12/2016 Page7of15 B.C,D131 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 15.Construct the following perimeter street improvements including,but not limited to: Curb &Gutter A.C.Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Notes:(a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter,(b)Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check,(c) If so marked,sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114.(d) If so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 16.Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010,no person shall make connections from a source of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless,in addition to any and all other codes,regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit,the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval,as determined by the City Engineer,provided that reasonable,safe and maintainable access to the property exists.In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings,structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/12/2016 Page 8 of 15 B.C,D132 Project #:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2Q16-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot LineAdjustment, MinorException,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONOmONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 17.Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans,including street trees, street lights,and intersection safety lights on future signal poles,and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,whichever occurs first. b.Prior to any work being performed In public right-of-way,fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping,marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and interconnectconduitshall be installedtothe satisfactionofthe City Engineer. d.Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved bythe CityEngineer. Notes: 1)Pull boxes shall be No.6at intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2)Conduitshall be 3-inchgalvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e.Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f.Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction.Street or lane closure permits are required.A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g.Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards,except for single-family residential lots. h.Street names shallbe approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. I.All public improvements (interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped areas,etc.)shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include,but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches,sidewalks,street lights, and street trees. www.CityofRC.usPrinted:10/12/2016 Page 9of15 B,C,D133 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location;--107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 18. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans.Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)."Where public landscape plans are required,tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector.Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 19.Street trees,a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 20. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 21.Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 22.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first.Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or priorto the issuance of permits inthe case ofall other residential projects. Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the start of landscaping operations,the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner,City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.The weed barrier shall be permeable. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 10/12/2016 PagelOofIS B,C,D134 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007.DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,MinorException, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 2.Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code,City Grading Standards,and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work.Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittai for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan,appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed,submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittai is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill.The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed bya California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance ofa grading permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit.All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8.If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review,the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittai and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. A drainage study showing a 100-year,AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit.The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter.All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 10.lt shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s)to construct wall(s)on property line(s)and/or removing existing fences, or provide a detail(s)showing the perimeter wall(s)tobe constructed offset from the property line. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code.All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail Including gradients,elevations,and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. www.CityofRC.usPrinted;10/12/201B Page gf^5 BX,D135 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot Line Adjustment, MinorException, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way,permitted line,or the adjacent private property.All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 15. Private sewer,water,and storm drain improvements will be designed per the,latest adopted California Plumbing Code.Storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 16. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent.Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 17.Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 18.The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 19. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided inthe City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 22.Grading Inspections;a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting.The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative,the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures,etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations,the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;b)The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day In advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations:i)The bottom of the over-excavation;ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;ill)At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;iv)The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the Issuance of a building permit. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 24. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. www.CHyofRC.us Printed:10/12/2016 Page 12 of 15 B,C,D136 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 25. The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennialbasis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID).The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 28.All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue)must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 29.The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells), with the Facility ID Number assigned,to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to Issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 30. The land owner shall provide an Inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s)as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 31.Prior to issuance of a wall permit,on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (I.e. a manufactured slope is not present).This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 32.The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described In the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. www.CityofRC.usPrinted:10/12/2016 Page13ofl5 B,C,D137 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455.LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 33. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP)shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's).In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit,the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document,and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device.If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision,prior to the sale of the residential lot,the developer shall include maintenance agreement{s)as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer.A copy of the maintenance agreements to be Included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP).At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris.All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP"section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 35.Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H:Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII - Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations,..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 36. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment.The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines In the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 37. Prior to Issuance of a grading permit, the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3,CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2)and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner{s)for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property.The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set.The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. www.CityofRC.us Printed;10/12/2016 Page 14 of 15 B,C,D138 Project #:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,MinorException, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39.The subject project,shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site.If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows,then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes,prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. Printed;10/12/2016 www.CityofRC.us Page 15 of 15 B,C,D139 RESOLUTION NO.16-50 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00007,A REQUEST TO REMOVE 62 TREES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 182-UNIT MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING 5 LIVE-WORK UNITS) ON 4.78 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE (MU)DISTRICT,LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HERMOSA AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN;1077-601-13 AND 1077-601-14. A.Recitals. 1.The applicant,Charles Joseph Associates,filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit No.DRC2016-00007,as described in the title of this Resolution.Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of October,2016,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE,it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on October 26,2016,including written and oral staff reports,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a.The application applies to approximately 4.78 acres of land,basically a rectangular configuration,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and is currently designated Mixed Use;and b.The project site is approximately 363 feet from east to west and 619 feet from north to south and the southerly half of the site contains a liquor store (Shop &Go), a motel (Motel 66),and a closed night club (Rock the Keys);the northerly half of the site is vacant;and c.The property to the north contains single-family homes;to the east is the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633)and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has been used commercially;to the south is a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks);and to the west are commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound)and an older multi-family residential complex;and B,C,D140 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-50 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 2 d.The related Design Review application (DRC2016-00006)is a request to develop a 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units),located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;and e.The trees are not designated as historically significant;and f.The trees are not noted in any Specific Plan/Community Plan or condition of approval;and g.The Arborist Report (Arborist Services,December 2,2015)evaluated a total of 62 trees on the project site whose location conflicts with project improvements;3 of these trees meet the Development Codes criteria for height and trunk dimension to be considered heritage trees.Most of the 62 trees on-site are in average to below average condition,several are dead, and the location of all trees conflictwith proposed improvements.All 3 trees that meet the height and dimension criteria for heritage trees (Tree of Heaven)were not planted as part of a project, but are presumed to be seeded by birds and are considered a weed.The Landscape Plan demonstrates that the 62 trees removed as part of this project will be replaced with a variety of 36-inch box,24-inch box,and 15-gallon size trees.Based on Development Code standards for tree plantings a total of 163 trees are required for the project,and the Landscape Plan proposes planting trees throughout the project site to address this requirement;and h. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to construct improvements which allow economic enjoyment of the property; and i.There are a variety of existing healthy trees in the neighborhood;the removal does not affect the established character of the area and the property values;and j. Itis not necessary to remove the trees to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way;and k.The trees cannot be preserved by pruning and proper maintenance or relocation rather than removal;and I.The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings offacts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a.The proposed Tree Removal Permit is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The related mixed use development (Design Review DRC2016-00006)is consistent with the General Plan Mixed Use land use designation.The removal of the subject trees is necessary to develop the related 182-unit mixed use development;and b.The proposed Tree Removal Permit is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located,which permits the removal of heritage trees when associated with development ofa project site.In this case removal ofthe trees is necessary to constructa related 182-unit mixed use development Additionally,the Arborist Report submitted for the related project (Arborist Services,December 2,2015) B,C,D141 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-50 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 3 determined that the on-site trees are in poor condition due to their condition,health,and conflict with proposed improvements;and c.The proposed Tree Removal Permit Is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including replacement of the removed trees with trees of a species and quantity commensurate with the aesthetic value of the trees to be removed.Inthis case,a minimum of 163 trees will be planted as part of the related development,101 more trees than those removed;and d.The proposed Tree Removal Permit,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health,safety,or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the 62 on-site trees will be replaced with 163 new trees throughout the project site. 4.Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto,and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a.Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the Citystaff prepared an Initial Study ofthe potential environmental effects of the project.Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, Citystaff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures,there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment.Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.Thereafter,the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration;and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and,based on the whole record before it,finds:(i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA;and (ii)that,based on the imposition of mitigation measures,there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration;and c.The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project;and d.The custodian of records for the Initial Study,Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730,telephone (909)477-2750. B,C,D142 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-50 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 4 5.Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth In paragraphs 1,2. 3,and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1)Approval of this Tree Removal Permit application is subject to Planning Commission approval of Design Review DRC2016-00006. 2)All applicable Conditions of Approval as contained in Resolution No. 16-49 approving DRC2016-00006,shall apply. 3)Approval is granted for the removal of all 62 trees on-site.The 62 trees removed as part of this project will be replaced with a variety of 36-inch box.24-inch box,and 15-gallon size trees.Based on Development Code standards for tree plantings a total of 163 trees are required for the project,and replacement trees shall be planted throughout the project site.The replacement tree plantings shall be indicated on the Landscape Plan submitted for plan check. 4)This permit shall be valid for a period of 90 days,unless an extension is requested in writing at least 14 days prior to the expiration date. Where this permit is associated with development,the effective date begins and the 90 days shall start from the date of issuance of a grading permit. 6,The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca,Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett,Secretary B,C,D143 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-50 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2016-00007 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 5 I,Candyce Burnett,Secretary ofthe Planning Commission ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day ofOctober 2016,by the following vote-to-wit: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN:COMMISSIONERS: B,CD144 Conditions of Approval (Community Development Department Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00456.LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:- -107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1.Approval Is for the development of a 182-unit multi-family residential development {including 5 live-work units) on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU)District,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue:APN:1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14. 2.Approval of this Design Review application is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007 and MinorException DRC2016-00455. 3.A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to occupancy. The Parking Management Plan shalf include, at a minimum,requirements that the use of the garages and carports will be strictly monitored.The City Planner may periodically review and require additional parking mitigation measures if it is determined that the on-site parking is inadequate to meet the project's ongoing parking demand. 4.On-street parking along the east side of Hermosa Avenue may be provided to support this Design Review application.The final design and number on-street parking spaces shall be subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval. 5.Demolition of the existing structures shall meet or exceed requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1403- Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities. standard Conditions of Approval 6.All roof appurtenances,including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department.Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner.Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork,that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet,shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building.Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork,that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 7.Mitigation measures are required for the project.The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures,including monitoring and reporting.Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of S729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits,guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures.These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures.Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. wv/w.CityofRC.us Printed 10/12'2016 B.C,D145 Project#; DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-Q0006 Project Name: The Vinter on Foothill Location;—107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 8.In those instances requiring long term monitoring (I.e.beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 9. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City,its agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval.The applicant shall reimburse the City,its agents,officers,or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City,its agents,officers,or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action.The City may,at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 10.Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval,Conditions of Approval,and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 11.Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 12.The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.25.All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 13.Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date ofapprovalora time extension has been granted. 14.For multi-family residential development,property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site,as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way.All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition,and shall receive regular pruning,fertilizing,mowing,and trimming. Any damaged,dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30days from the date of damage. 15.A detailed landscape and irrigation plan,including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development,shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone,the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 16.Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www.CityofRC.us Printed,10/12/2016 PaS®2 of15 B,C.D146 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITiONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls,landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 18.Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 19.All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment.If located in public maintenance areas,the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 20. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 21. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes.Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting.The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22.All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 23.All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 24. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner,City Engineer,and Rancho Gucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 25.All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. 26.Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 27.The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval.Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department priorto installationofany signs. 28. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 29.A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. v/v/w.CityofRC.us Printed, 10/12/2016 Page 3 of15 B.C,D147 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 30.Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with ail sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances,and applicable Community,Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 31.All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. 32.The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and Engineering Services Department approval;including,but not limited to,public notice requirements,special street posting,phone listing for community concerns,hours of construction activity,dust control measures,and security fencing. 33.The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein,and Development Code regulations. 34. For multiple-family development,provide exterior locl<able storage space as required by the California Green Building Code. 35.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers,etc.,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls,berming,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 36. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches,trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants,bike racks, light bollards,etc.,shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style.Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 37.All parkways,open areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City.Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 38. For multiple-family development,laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 39. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram,shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (909-477-2800)prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style,illumination,location,height,and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 40.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy,plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance.The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. www.CityofRC.us Printed.10/12/2016 Page 4 of 15 B,C.D148 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name;The Vinter on Foothill Location;--107760113-0000 Project Type; Design Review LotLineAdjustment, MinorException, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 41.All site, grading, landscape,irrigation,and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading,tree removal,encroachment,building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 42.Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction ofthe City Planner. 43.Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter.If a double wall condition would result,the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall.Developer shall notify,by mail,all contiguous property owners at least30 days prior tothe removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 44.Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior tothe issuance of Building Permits. 45.Trash receptacle(s)are required and shall meet City standards.The final design,locations,and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 46.Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking,with a minimum ofone rack with a capacity for two bicycles. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1.Hermosa is a Secondary Arterial and will need to be widened to 32 feet from curb to centerline from Foothill to northern tract boundary.Dedicate the necessary right-of-way to the satisfaction of the city engineer. wvvw.CityofRC.usPrinted.10/12/2016 PageSofIS B,C,D149 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007.DRC2016-00455.LLA2016-00006 Project Name;The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2.Hermosa Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary"standards as required and including: A.Provide curb,gutter,sidewalk,and driveway. B.Proposed driveway shall be for Emergency Vehicle Access only.Provide a Limited Access Curb per City Standard Plan 105-C to discourage potential residential access.Because the proposed drivewayis Emergency Vehicle Access only,a median curb is not required along Hermosa Avenue. C. Provide signing and striping plans.In the future if the City determines that the Level of Service is unacceptable at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue, the City may remove on-street parking in order to add an additional northbound lane. D.Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV-equlvalent LED street lights as required. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. E.Relocate and modifytrafficsignal and related equipment as required. F.Revise signing and striping. 3.Foothill Boulevard frontage Improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including; A.Provide curb and gutter and sidewalk at the ultimate condition including,but not limited to, 1 left turn lane,3 travel lanes,and 1 bike lane. B.The driveway approach along Foothill shall be designed as far east as possible. C. Provide 16000 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights as required.Coordinate with City staff to design street lights. D.Provide signing and striping plans. E.Relocate and modify traffic signal and related equipment. F.Revise signing and striping. G.No median breaks on Foothill Boulevard. H.Parkway improvements shall be in conformance with the Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan,including streetlights and an in-lieu fee for special pavers within the intersection. www-CityofRC.us Printed.10/12*2016 Page 6 of15 B,C,D150 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name;The Vinter on Foothill Location;--107760113-0000 Project Type;Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. Existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground on both streets along the entire frontage of the existing parcel per the Existing Overhead Utility Requirements Policy,prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy,whichever occurs first. 5. Hermosa striping must delineate parking stalls from travel lane. Provide signing and striping to guide traffic away from the first parking stall at the south end, and to guide traffic away from the protruding curb north of the project property line. 6.Development impact fees will be applied at the building permit. Note;fees are subject to change annually 7. The street lights shall be owned by the City.Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. standard Conditions of Approval 8.Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 9.Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-wayshall be dedicated to the City. 10. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City.Permits issued on or after June 2,2014,must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement;a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us,under City Hail;Engineering:Environmental Programs. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation,prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 13. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 14.Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees;"All improvements within the public right-of-way,including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. w\iVW.CityofRC,us Printed. 10/12/2016 Page 7 of 15 B,C,D151 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455.LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot LineAdjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 15.Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limitedto: Curb &Gutter A.C.Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Notes:(a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter,(b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check,(c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d)If so marked, an in-lieu ofconstruction fee shall be provided forthis item. 16.Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37,010,no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except;that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit,the development may have energy connections made In equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval,as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable,safe and maintainable access to the property exists.In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings,structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all Improvements required by these conditions of development approval. vAvw.CityofRC.usPrintedM0/12/'2016 Page 8of15 B,C,D152 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name;The Vinter on Foothill Location:-- -107760113-0000 ProjectType: Design Review Lot LineAdjustment.Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 17.Improvement Plans and Construction: a.Street improvement plans,including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights on future signal poles,and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer.Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,v/hichever occurs first. b.Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way,fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c.Pavement striping,marking,traffic signing,street name signing,traffic signal conduit,and interconnect conduit shallbe installed tothe satisfaction ofthe City Engineer. d.Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be Installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring.Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR,or any other locations approved bythe City Engineer. Notes; 1)Pull boxes shall be No.6at intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2)Conduit shallbe 3-inch galvanized steel with pull ropeoras specified. e.Access ramps for the disabled shall be Installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f.Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction.Street or lane closure permits are required.A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards,except for single-family residential lots. h.Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 1,All public improvements (interior streets,drainage facilities,community trails,paseos,landscaped areas,etc.)shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include,but are not limited to,curb and gutter,AC pavement, drive approaches,sidewalks,street lights, and street trees. www.CityoFRC.usPrinted-10/12/2016 Page 9 of 15 B,C,D153 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 18.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows.The completed legend (box below)and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min.Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 19. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program, 20. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation ofexisting utilities as necessary. 21. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved.Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 22. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first.Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case ofsubdivision or priorto the issuance of permits inthe case of all other residential projects. Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner,City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.The weed barrier shall be permeable. www.CityofRC.us Printed 10/12/2016 Page 10of15 B,C,D154 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-QQ007,DRC201G-00455.LLA2016-000D6 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:-- -107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment.Minor Exception,Tree RemovalPermit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 2.Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code,City Grading Standards,and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3.A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work.Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review.Plans shall implement design recommendations persaid report. 4.A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the timeofapplication forGrading and Drainage Plan review. 5.The final Grading and Drainage Plan,appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed,submitted,and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6.A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill.The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared,stamped,and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior tothe issuance ofa grading permit. 7.The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit.All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside ofthe public right ofway. 8.If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review,the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9.A drainage study showing a 100-year,AMC 3 design storm event for on-slte drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to Issuance of a grading permit.The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-Inches and larger In diameter.All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 10.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements priorto the issuance ofa grading permit. 11.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s)to construct wall(s)on property line(s)and/or removing existing fences, or provide a detail(s)showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 12.Prior to Issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code.All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients,elevations,and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13.The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. www.CityofRC.usPrinted10/12/2D1S Page11of15 B.C,D155 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,IVIinor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDmONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 14.Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line,or the adjacent private property.All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code.. 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code.Storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 16. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent.Accessibility parl<ing stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 17. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkwayculvert per Cityof Rancho Cucamonga requirements priorto issuance ofa grading permit. 18.The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 19. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved bythe Building and Safety Official. 20. This project shall comply v/ith the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 21.Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided inthe Cityof Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information forGrading Plans and Permit". 22.Grading Inspections:a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading •meeting.The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative,the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures,etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations,the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working • day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations:i)The bottom of the over-excavation;ii) Completion of Rough Grading,prior to issuance of the building permit;iii)At the completion of Rough Grading,the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;iv)The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved priorto the issuance ofa building permit. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQIVIP)storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 24. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. vw/w.CityofRC.us Printad.10/12/2015 Page 12of 15 B.C,D156 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot LineAdjustment. MinorException.Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 25.The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basistothe City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 26.Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan"shall be submitted for review and approval bythe Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27.Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID).The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 28.All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue)must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department.This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 29.The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells), with the Facility ID Number assigned,to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan.A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set,and a copy of said form shall be included In the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 30.The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s)as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 31.Prior to Issuance of a wall permit,on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e.a manufactured slope is not present).This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 32.The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibilityofthe land owner. wvw/.CityofRC.usPrinted:10/12/2016 Page 13 of 15 B,C,D157 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007, DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 ProjectType:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE f=OLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 33.The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP)shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's).In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit,the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document,and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device.If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision,prior to the sale of the residential lot,the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s)as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 34.Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin Inlets shall include Insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP).At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris.All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described In the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP"section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 35.Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H:Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII -Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations,..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 36.Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment.The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 37.Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3,CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2)and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 38.Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s)for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property.The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet ofthe gradingand drainage planset. www.CilyofRC.us Printed 10/12/2015 B,C,D158 Page 14 of 15 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:—107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 39.The subject project,shall accept al!existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site.If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows,then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes,prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. www.CityofRC.us Printed.10/12/2016 PaS®"IS of 15 B,C,D159 RESOLUTION NO.16-51 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00455,A REQUEST TO REDUCE ON-SITE PARKING BY 25%FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 182-UNIT MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING 5 LIVE-WORK UNITS)ON 4.78 ACRES OF LAND IN THE MIXED USE (MU)DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND HERMOSA AVENUE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN:1077-601-13 AND 1077-601-14. A.Recitals. 1. The applicant,Charles Joseph Associates,filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2016-00455 as described in the title of this Resolution.Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of October, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE,it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission ofthe Cityof Rancho Cucamonga as follows; 1.This Commission hereby specificallyfinds that all of the facts set forth inthe Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 26, 2016,including m\[\en and oral staff reports, together with publictestimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to approximately 4.78 acres of land, basically a rectangular configuration,located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue and is currently designated Mixed Use;and b. The project site is approximately 363 feet from east to west and 619 feet from north tosouthandthe southerly half ofthesite contains a liquor store (Shop&Go),a motel (Motel 66), and a closed night club (Rock the Keys);the northerly halfofthe site is vacant; and c. The property to the north contains single-family homes; to the east is the Villaggio on Route 66 workforce apartment complex (DRC2006-00633),and an existing vacant single-family residential house that has been used commercially;to the south is a multi-tenant office building and restaurant (Kick Back Jacks); and to the west are commercial uses (Xtreme Autosound) and an older multi-family residential complex;and B,C,D160 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-51 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 2 d. The related Design Review application (DRC2016-00006)is a request to develop a 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units),located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;and e.The proposed project meets or exceeds all Development Code standards.As conditioned,the proposed apartment complex will meet all applicable Mixed Use (MU)District Development Code standards for multiple family residential development. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings offacts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed reduction in the required number of parking spaces is consistent with the General Plan,which has stated policies to support development projects that require infill development to be designed for pedestrians and automobiles equally,and to provide connections to transit and bicycle facilities (Policy LU-2.2). The proposed project provides 293 on-site parking spaces,as well as 42 secure bicycle parking spaces,and provides convenient access for both pedestrians and automobiles;and b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The proposed high density mixed use project is located on a major commercial thoroughfare that provides bus service. Further, the project plan is in near proximity to similar multi-family projects and nearby commercial land uses;and c. The proposed exception to the specificdevelopment standard(s)is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed reduction in the parking standards is necessary to allow increased residential density on the project site.The General Plan has a stated policy (Policy LU-4.1)to provide new mixed use development opportunities along the Foothill Boulevard corridor to allow residential, commercial and civic uses,and to accommodate both transit and automobiles. The proposed project is located adjacent to a major arterial and provides the opportunity for a mixed use development with convenient access to alternative transportationmodes.Additionally,the applicant will provide up to 16 additional on-street parking spaces that will offset the 95 parking space reduction;and d. The granting ofthe Minor Exception will not constitute a grant ofspecial privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified inthe same district,and will not be detrimentalto public health, safety or welfare or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity.The proposed reduction in the required numberof parking spaces is nota grant of special privilege in that the Development Code allows flexibility to reduce the requirednumber of parking spaces where the applicant has demonstrated that the project will provide adequate parking for all on-site uses. The applicant has submitted a parking study (LInscott,Law,& Greenspan, Engineers;May 4, 2016)verifying the adequacy of the proposed number ofon-site parking spaces.Additionally,the Parking Analysis was subject to peer review (Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates, July 5,2016)to verify its adequacy. 4. Based uponthe facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with allwritten and oral reports Included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there Is no substantial evidence that the B,C,D161 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-51 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 3 project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto,and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a.Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project.Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures,there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment.Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared.Thereafter,the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration;and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and,based on the whole record before it,finds:(i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA;and (ii)that,based on the imposition of mitigation measures,there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission.Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration:and c.The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation.The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d.The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.Those documents are available for public review inthe Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive,Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730,telephone (909)477-2750. 5.Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1,2,3,and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1)Approval of this Minor Exception application is subject to Planning Commission approval of Design Review DRC2016-00006. 2)All applicable Conditions of Approval as contained in Resolution No. 16-49 approving DRC2016-00006,shall apply. 3)Approval is for a Minor Exception to reduce the required on-site parking by 95 parking spaces related to development of a 182-unit multi-family residential development (including 5 live-work units) on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District,located at the B,CD162 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-51 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2016-00455 -CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES October 26,2016 Page 4 northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN: 1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14. 4)The Development Code requires 388 parking spaces based on a summation of uses within the project site. The proposed Minor Exception will reduce on-site parking by 95 parking spaces to provide a total of 293 parking spaces on-site through a combination of garage,carport,and open parking spaces. 5) A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to occupancy. The Parking Management Plan shall include,at a minimum,requirements that the use of the garages and carports will be strictly monitored.The Planning Director may periodically review and require additional parking mitigation measures if itis determined that the on-site parking is inadequate to meet the project's ongoing parking demand. 6) The applicant proposes providing up to 16 on-street parking spaces on the along the east side of Hermosa Avenue.These on-street parking spaces do not count towards meeting the required on site parking requirement for the project.Final design of the striping plan for the Hermosa Avenue on street parkingshall be subject to review and approval by the Engineering Services Director. 6.The,Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption ofthis Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca,Chairman ATTEST; Candyce Burnett,Secretary I,Candyce Burnett,Secretary ofthe Planning Commission ofthe City ofRancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26thday ofOctober2016, bythe following vote-to-wit: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN:COMMISSIONERS: B,C,D163 Conditions of Approval (Community Development Department Project#;DRC2016-00005 DRC2016-00007.DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 Project Type; Design Review LotLine Adjustment,Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1.Approval is for the development of a 182-unit multi-family residential development (Including 5 live-work units) on 4.78 acres of land in the Mixed Use (MU)District,located at the northeast comer of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue;APN:1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14, 2.Approval of this Design Review application is contingent upon Planning Commission approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00007 and MinorException DRC2016-00455. 3. A Parking Management Plan shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to occupancy.The Parking Management Plan shall include, at a minimum,requirements that the use of the garages and carports will be strictly monitored. The City Planner may periodically review and require additional parking mitigation measures if it is determined that the on-site parking is inadequate to meet the project's ongoing parking demand. 4. On-street parking along the east side of Hermosa Avenue may be provided to support this Design Review application. The final design and number on-street parking spaces shall be subject to City Planner and City Engineer review and approval. 5.Demolition of the existing structures shall meet or exceed requirements of SCAQMD Rule 1403 - Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities, Standard Conditions of Approval 6.All roof appurtenances,including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet,shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building.Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building.Details shall be included in building plans. 7.Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures,including monitoring and reporting.Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the City Planner in the amount of S729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits,guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures.These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures.Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. Primed 10/'12.'2015 wv/v/,CityofRC us B,CD164 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location;---107760113-0000 Project Type; Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 8. in those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e.beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the City Planner prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shalh identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 9. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City,its agents,officers, or employees,because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City,its agents,officers,or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City,its agents,officers,or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action.The City may, at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 10.Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval,Conditions of Approval,and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s)are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 11.Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. 12. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.25.All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 13. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date ofapproval or a time extension has been granted. 14. For multi-family residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way.All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition,and shall receive regular pruning,fertilizing,mowing,and trimming. Any damaged,dead,diseased,or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 15.A detailed landscape and irrigation plan,including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision.For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 16.Within parking lots,trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. wv/v/.CityofRC.usPrinted,10/12/2016 Page 2of15 B,C,D165 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name;The Vinter on Foothill Location;--107760113-0000 Project Type; Design Reviev/Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17.The final design of the perimeter parkways,walls,landscaping,and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 18.Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 19. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment.If located in public maintenance areas,the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 20.Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82, 21.The applicant shall contact the U.S.Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes.Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting.The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22.All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 23.All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g.,over a curb stop). 24.Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner,City Engineer,and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits.For residential development,private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 25.All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles,entrances,and exits shall be striped per City standards. 26.Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 27.The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval.Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinanceyand shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 28.Unless exempt,directory monument sign(s)shall be provided for apartment,condominium,or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 29. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. VAwv.CityofRC.us Printed 10/12/2016 Page3of15 B,C,D166 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455.LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 30.Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances,and applicable Community,Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 31.All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner,including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. 32. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for City Planner and Engineering Services Department approval;including,but not limited to,public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns,hours of construction activity, dust control measures,and security fencing. 33.The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans,architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and Development Code regulations. 34. For multiple-family development,provide exterior lockable storage space as required by the California Green Building Code. 35.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers,AC condensers,etc.,shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls,bermlng,and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 36.A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants,bike racks,light bollards,etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 37.All parkways, open areas,and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City.Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 38. For multiple-family development,laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 39.A detailed on-site lighting plan,including a photometric diagram,shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Police Department (909-477-2800)prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style,illumination,location,height,and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 40.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with.Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. www.CityofRC.us Printed.10/12/2016 Page 4 of 15 B,C,D167 Project #;DRC2Q16-000Q6 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00Q06 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 ProjectType: Design Review Lot LineAdjustment,Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 41.All site,grading,landscape,irrigation,and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading,tree removal,encroachment,building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 42.Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 43.Six-foot decorative blocl<walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter.If a double wall condition would result,the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall.Developer shall notify,by mail,all contiguous property owners at least 30days prior tothe removal ofany existing walls/fences alongthe project perimeter. 44.Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior tothe issuance of Building Permits. 45. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 46.Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rale equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking,with a minimum ofone rack with a capacity fortwo bicycles. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Hermosa is a Secondary Arterial and will need to be widened to 32 feet from curb to centerline from Foothill to northern tract boundary.Dedicate the necessary right-of-way to the satisfaction of the city engineer. www.CityofRC.usPrinted:10/12/2016 Page5of15 B,C.D168 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455.LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 ProjectType: Design Review Lot LineAdjustment,Minor Exception, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 2.Hermosa Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary"standards as required and including: A.Provide curb,gutter,sidewalk,and driveway. B.Proposed driveway shall be for Emergency Vehicle Access only. Provide a Limited Access Curb per City Standard Plan 105-C to discourage potential residential access.Because the proposed driveway is Emergency Vehicle Access only,a median curbis not required along Hermosa Avenue. C. Provide signing and striping plans. In the future if the City determines that the Level of Service is unacceptable at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue,the City may remove on-street parking in order to add an additional northbound lane. D.Provide 9500 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights as required.Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. E. Relocate and modify traffic signal and related equipment as required. F.Revise signing and striping. 3.Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards as required and including: A.Provide curb and gutter and sidewalk at the ultimate condition including,but not limited to, 1 left turn lane,3 travel lanes,and 1 bike lane. B.The driveway approach along Foothill shall be designed as far east as possible. C.Provide 16000 Lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights as required.Coordinate with City staff to design street lights. D.Provide signing and striping plans. E.Relocate and modifytrafficsignal and related equipment. F.Revise signing and striping. G.No median breaks on Foothill Boulevard. H.Parkway improvements shall be in conformance with the Foothill Boulevard Historic Route 66 Visual Improvement Plan,Including streetlights and an in-lieu fee for special pavers within the intersection. www.CityofRC.usPrinted:10/12/2016 Page6of 1S B,C,D169 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4.Existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground on both streets along the entire frontage of the existing parcel per the Existing Overhead Utility Requirements Policy, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy,whichever occurs first. 5.Hermosa striping must delineate parking stalls from travel lane.Provide signing and striping to guide traffic away from the first parking stall at the south end,and to guide traffic away from the protruding curb north of the project property line. 6.Development impact fees will be applied at the building permit. Note:fees are subject to change annually 7.The street lights shall be owned by the City.Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. standard Conditions of Approval 8.Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 9.Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 10.The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to Issuance of Building Permits. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program.The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City.Permits issued on or after June 2,2014,must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2,2014,require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement:a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount,and all weight tickets.Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us,under City Hall;Engineering;Environmental Programs. 12. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation,prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit Issuance if no map is Involved. 13. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 14. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees:"All improvements within the public right-of-way,including street trees,shall be installed per the public improvement plans."If there Is a discrepancy between the public and private plans,the street Improvement plans will govern. v/wv/.CityofRC.us Printed:10/12/2016 Page 7 of 15 B,C,D170 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455.LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot LineAdjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 15.Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limitedto: Curb &Gutter A.C.Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Notes: (a)Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter,(b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check,(c) If so marked,sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) Ifso marked, an in-iieu ofconstruction fee shall be providedforthis Item. 16.Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010,no person shall make connections from a source of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit,the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval,as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable,safe and maintainable access to the property exists.In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings,structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.usPrinted,10/12/2016 PageSoflS B,C,D171 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007. DRC2016-00455.LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type; Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal'Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 17.Improvement Plans and Construction: a.Street improvement plans,Including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits,whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c.Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing,street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1)Pull boxes shall be No.6 at intersections and No.5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2)Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e.Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f.Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction.Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g.Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks.Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards,except for single-family residential lots. h.Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager priorto submittal for first plan check. I.All public improvements (interior streets,drainage facilities, community trails,paseos,landscaped areas,etc.)shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches,sidewalks,street lights,and street trees. www.CilyofRC.us Printed.10/12/2016 Page9ori5 B,CD172 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:-- -107760113-0000 ProjectType: Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,iVlinor Exception. Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 18.install street trees per City street tree design guideiines and standards as follows.The completed legend (box below)and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans.Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating; "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)."Where public landscape plans are required,tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min.Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees; 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2)Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector.Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require bacl<fill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Streettrees are tobe planted per public improvement plans only. 19.Street trees,a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger,shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 20.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 21.Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved.Approval ofthe final parcel map will be subjecttoany requirements that maybe received from them. 22.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino.A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first.Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior tothe issuance of permits in thecase of ail other residential projects. Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 1.Prior to the start of landscaping operations,the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner,City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.The weed barriershall be permeable. „.^wv/w.CityofRC.usPr,mad:10/12/2015 Page 10 of 15 B,C,D173 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2Q16-00455,LLA2Q16-QQ006 Project Name:The Vinler on Foothill Location;---107760113-0000 Project Type: Design Review Lot LineAdjustment,iVlinor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 2.Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code,City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work.Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review.Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill.The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared,stamped,and wet signed bya California licensed Civil Engineer'prior to the issuance ofa grading permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit.All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right ofway. 8.If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review,the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. A drainage study showing a 100-year,AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit.The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter.All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 10.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements priorto the issuance ofa grading permit. 11.Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s)to construct wall(s)on property line(s)and/or removing existing fences, or provide a detail(s)showing the perimeter wall{s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code.All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients,elevations,and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible,and shall provide details for all work notcoveredby City Standard Drawings. www.CityofRC.usPrinted;10/12/2016 Page 11of15 B,C,D174 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455, LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:--107760113-0000 Project Type; Design Review Lot LineAdjustment. MinorException, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 14.Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way,permitted line,or the adjacent private property.All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Buildinq Code. 15.Private sewer,water,and storm drain improvements will be designed per the.latest adopted California Plumbing Code.Storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 16.Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent.Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 17.Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior toissuanceofa grading permit. 18.The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 19.The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5.000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit.The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20.This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 21.Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided In the City ofRancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 22.Grading Inspections:a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting.The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative,the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures,etc.If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations,the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;b)The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations:I)The bottom of the over-excavation;il) Completion of Rough Grading,prior to issuance of the building permit;lil)At the completion of Rough Grading,the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter)an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;iv)The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance ofa building permit. 23.Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 24.Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. wvA-ACItyofRC-usPrinted:10/12/2016 PagelZofIS B,C,D175 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2016-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type;Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 25.The land owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis tothe City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan"shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID).The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 28.All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department.This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 29.The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells), with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 30.The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s)as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 31.Prior to issuance of a wall permit,on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present).This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 32.The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. www.CityofRC.usPrinted,10/12/2016 Page 13 of15 B,C,D176 Project#:DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455.LLA2016-00006 Project Name;The Vinter on Foothill Location:---107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 33. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's).In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit,the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with -applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device.If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot,the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s)as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document, 34.Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP).At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris.All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP"section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 35.Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H:Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII -Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations,..." of the San'Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. 36.Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the permitted grading plan set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3,CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2)and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s)for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property.The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. www.CityofRC.u5 Printed,10/12/2016 Page 14 of15 B,C,D177 Project#;DRC2016-00006 DRC2016-00007,DRC2016-00455,LLA2Q16-00006 Project Name:The Vinter on Foothill Location;—107760113-0000 Project Type:Design Review Lot Line Adjustment,Minor Exception,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THEFOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 39.The subject project,shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site.If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows,then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes,prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. www.CityofRC.us „ Printed:10/12/2016 Page 15 of 1 B,C,D178 Staff Report Planning Department date:October 26,2016 C™NGA TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM:Candyce Burnett, City Planner BY: Nikki Cavazos,Assistant Planner SUBJECT:TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20026 - 10235 ALTA LOMA,LLC;A request to subdivide a parcel of 1.67 acres,into six (6)parcels,in the Low Residential (L)District located south of 19'^Street between Hermosa Avenue and Haven Avenue;APN:1076- 121-03.Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 32 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) exemption,which covers in-fill development on no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Determine that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-FIll Development Project). •Adopt the Resolution approving Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20026 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A.Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences;Low Residential (L)District South - Deer Canyon Elementary School;Low Residential (L)District East - Single-Family Residences;Low Residential (L)District West - Single-Family Residences;Low Residential (L)District B.General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North -Low Residential South -Schools East -Low Residential West -Low Residential C.Site Characteristics;The project site isa "double-frontage"parcel located between 19^^Street on the north and,Hamilton Street on the south. Hermosa Avenue and Haven Avenue are about 950 feet and 1,425 feet to the west and east of the site, respectively (Exhibit A).It is rectangular in shape and is approximately 224 feet (east to west) and approximately 335 feet (north to south)with an area of about 73,000 square feet (1.67 acres). There are currently several structures including a single-family residence on the property. The property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides ofabout 1,441 and 1,430 feet, respectively. ltemE-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT200026 -10235 ALTA LOMA,LLC October 26,2016 Page 2 The property is bound on the west,east,and north (across 19'^Street)by single-family residences (Exhibit B).To the south,across Hamilton Street,is Deer Canyon Elementary SchooL The zoning ofthe subject property and the surrounding properties is Low Residential (L) District. ANALYSIS: A.Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20026:The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into six (6)lots for residential development.Development/construction of homes following the subdivision ofthe property will be by others or the applicant at a future date.As previously noted,the site is improved with several structures including a single-family residential home,a barn,a corral and a shed. The applicant is proposing to demolish the structures which were built around 1971.According to the cultural resources study prepared by Historic Resource Associates in May of 2016,the property has no prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, features,artifacts,historic buildings or historic structures.No significant cultural resources were identified in the project area. Therefore the project will have no effect on historic or cultural resources. The minimum lot area that is required in the Low Residential (L)District is 7.200 square feet. The proposed lots range between 11,723 square feet (Lot 5)and 12.427 square feet (Lot 4)in area. The average lot area that is requiredforthis district is 8.000 square feet. The average lot area ofthe proposed lots is 9.125 square feet.Lots in this district are required to have a minimum width of 65 feet and a minimum depth of 100 feet. The proposed lots are about 75 feet in width and 163 feet in depth.Therefore,the proposed project conforms to all technical standards applicable tothe subdivision of property in the Low Residential (L)District.Lots 1- 3 and 4-6 will havestreet frontage on,and direct access to,19'^Street and Hamilton Street, respectively- no additional streets are required. B.Design Review Committee:The six (6)lots as proposed meet all technical standards for minimum lot dimensions (width and depth), and minimum lot size and average lot area as described in the Development Code.Typically the Design Review Committee reviews the layout ofthe subdivision andthe architecture ofthe house product.However,as the proposed subdivision is conventional inits layout with access to existing streets,the site has no unusual physical constraints or characteristics,and no house product is proposed at this time,it was deemed by Staff thata review by the Design Review Committee was not necessary.A Design Review Committeemeeting will be held at the timeofhouse product submittal. C.Neighborhood Meeting:A neighborhood meeting was held on October 3, 2016 at the Deer Canyon Elementary School at 10225 Hamilton Street.Twelve (12)people attended and provided feedback regarding the proposed project.The attendees asked about the time frame for the project and asked when houses would be built.The applicant stated that they did not know when house product would be proposed or built but estimated that it would be at least several years.One neighbor expressed concern at the meeting,and in mailed correspondence,that she believed that the development ofthe land would negatively impact the property values of the surrounding homes and would remove the open land which- provides a home for domestic animals (Exhibit H). Although the lot is currently underutilized,it is zoned Low Residential and is not public open space.The proposed project is consistent with the land use district and lots are generally Item E -2 Pl-ANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT200026 -10235 ALTA LOMA, LLC October 26,2016 Page 3 larger than the lots in nearby subdivisions to the north and southeast ofthe site. However, the proposed lots are smaller in area than the lots to the immediate east and west of the site (an average area of about 44,500 square feet) that are unusually large for this district.Staff also has observed that new development which meets or exceeds the technical standards and the intent of the zoning and is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood generally increases property values. D.Technical Review Committee:The proposed project was reviewed by the Technical Review Committee on October 4,2016.The Committee accepted the proposal as submitted and recommended approval.The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E,Environmental Assessment:The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Project)because the project involves the construction of development within City limits on no more than 5 acres that is substantially surrounded by urban uses.Additionally,approval of the project would not result in any significant effect relating to traffic,noise,air quality, or water quality.Staff reviewed a noise and air quality (including greenhouse gasses)study, biological study, cultural study and an arborist report and concluded that there would not be any significant effect on the environment.Lastly,the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services and the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan polices as well as the applicable zoning designation and regulations. Therefore,Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines. CORRESPONDENCE:This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Vallev Dailv Bulletin newspaper,the property was posted,and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site.No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Burnett City Planner CB:NC/ls Attachments:Exhibit A -Location Map Exhibit B -Aerial Photo Exhibit C -Site Utilization Map Exhibit D -Site Plan Exhibit E -Tentative Tract Map Exhibit F -Biological Study (Figure 4) Exhibit G -Neighborhood Meeting Summary Exhibit H -Public Correspondence from Neighborhood meeting Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT20026 Item E -3 UiOU V r ,-«'*l ^t f,iTpawf"*.!i vmf*i ;a u ?>-try/-::/.V^M —//>,. ?I !:;rU'r- I _r^.!*1 •!ip^ JmiWMMJ jAf,J-J A ^0 0 MIW4'WMUJ«9 ve((0«vv3«»ottstnK MUWK Ai MliO C JMTi iouin* DOM rmijiuo ^ituma // V *r A:iridfi- '^i ^^'i 1 ' X I ...^ —.3 !\~i iii i \fTLi •iri==r^^=^ ;i awaojTj liii- i ,fc^U. •<4'"""F 'i'-i.I j » .,—( ;'3 I. f I,r.>1 —,j{J J i - n aiis PdfoJd £ 'f r '•I #••'^n I I i-.. m m •' 1 NOuril I . j y^|4::3tQ 1 i i_l.'tiL-i «Syg8^AlWfV|Jr«—>•! i.-,jiq>y t a J -a A -ii..5 ' o. m X SUBTTM20026 Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00613 Project Site A.•tT- m X CD O O WINON DRIVE 19TH STREET CNnC;|U L4« 12-4 HEATJIEJi STREET RJNG AVENUE ixm RES >eNiiAi I-*ai/ HAMILTON STREET •D •• vicT^^TTMTi ZOKNQ;u low RCaKNTIM. <2-4 Ou/oc) ninIntFfeA^I ilrnlnlnInlrH I 19TH STREET nN STREET L, LOT RE DENTUl (2 t «/« l.MIGNONETTS'^7^ tHOf.I.Y si LOT RtS ®ai// VICTOR SITE UTILIZATION MAP TRACT MAP NO.20026 SCALE:l"=100'-0" NORTH S oON ii i a Q.. < CO <H O 3S"<-<0 ^f s j-5 o <n <-I 2 gs (O I-°< <oi > < a.u w L-- s in d z§«o w 2 5 54 00 < §®S 5 ««• 2-5 <i<s= i^rs's W =sSJ SU-1 L 3UJ0tl a 1ISIHX3'-J15M15'21'III .1 1 i\^ S0015'2rw EGL Associates,Inc MBit COLORINC ROAD.Unit ARCADIA.CA 61006 T«l:(e2B}2U-SSBB Fam:(5S2]2S3-SS99 ©©©8 ©®©mS8112ggS? ii ^ 9 15 3 8 8 a BB KP 9e II paEYARroroi/ 10235 ALTALOMA LLC 766 SILVER VALLEY TRAIL WALNUT. CA 91789 SOOTi'jl'iy lls li¥\r%^aV\=\\WS^s \i^.yg\o V'S#^7'\I'siji r \\—V'^1.I liw ^K| J ;;\ i >?, S0015'2t'W I «!BR<3{]«'<»^iSsB P »g €> .I'MSlI 5 ?. \">"h\\\n -• «ii IP.'i I 324.93' rBQjECrLOC*Tia.s 6 LOT SUBDIVISION 10235 19THST ALTALOMA.CA 91737 Ill X TYPICAL LOT DBAINACE DRTAIL SCAlX:1'•W T* W 1.iVJ fe?/•»/•/—7^ (nMfJl ✓/NilW) s-'-l ./g •^^ V-.—' ^Prf r::5^njo;•RSSSrf"-t».[hj-^iT!-•-""AmJ„y|y0-—^^> t f'^AUilWN^iM^~ -®-•I ^,^._J N fHWK I TENTATIVE TRACT NO.20026 IN THE QTY OF RANCHO COCAUONGA.COUNTY OF SAK BERNARCHMO. STATE OF CAUFOfiNIA BEING A SUBaviSON OT THAT PORTJON Of THE NOKJHEAST t/4 Of SECJJW J5 ,lOmSHIP 1 NORIH,RANCE 7 ftfSj;SAH BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.ACCORDINC TO THE OmOAL PLAT THEREOF. /•ao kufr AO. WUt/l6A$l799 Cj a»-«9-fJ9l iriJi caow CM utfTii --^'1^us'.tmnJt nitK ttSlKT ra -MM OKMOKA MV OSmCt cu '9Mtm cjimtA Gts m flmBML •SO/ftCW C4rDNA QBO*OL tunoc*iecov ns -m»Eiicunu nc DSMncn smr •A«NO<o gcwioiai scvf awDCiT JOfW- IK iiuvnomJiKsin)|0^t^M^aon*)(mnss) aaoFMOMfis I aasMuv Ktaua nxmntutnaoj •CT w yptuiDn 7iaaM ftsnwgflsgwtri»w7T soo mj nj s«EiiM oum «u»cr traionorr 01 U£JUnM MmoBITS IB KW«£D m AWWIO «w Mt is)i-i}i-u nuaas IT coe ojs jwo^WwocacMOeiw KBatKTiirian'Ksrcaeiacr csrcroeopeuBiEMKreuxBr on Hxnj s«o lu cacuitD IT 11Kuci.(s ira}01(s/M^ NORTH S0«£U*.JCf i \ r tC«CS* PMC UBi rMm SOtt.Is / •Of ra SDCE NOWVKINTTYHAP^ S oacnrg Hnm 7 noc sa wrsmie no (IK n«s« (tLUKTH UUS) ©csuxm HD aons Ksnctn odbcs msuo bubi eaorn n>poaioiTtnaaia4r«uta kbk neaasfiMMCT*! 0 «aictrrai Bin »«un eaofis m main R> OOttKXfeOHED lurft m or M ee if nm*. LOT AREA TABLE &Ma OCM F6 i;CQB&OLWVr*MIWO HfltKK^ichcsi voQifprucsaaoTffeaaxpjucrT: a«'K 4JJ OA 0UMnii MiMO ®fSo ?K MwS'wa?^'* ®S?»£ ®fTL2ffSPiS^«B«»««»«»*%no is iB tissB 04 B?OPOSfD WffWTr F^ffvmr umr- (Q^tnso f usmnsn»awx auMtctsmy aun mr^i CONSmUCTION NOTES 0 coRincrr iv sia imi cm kuhoi sr axmuc. <2>cwmicisn])whil DEMOUTIOW WQT^- }JCHOC OBM tDtCVCl —WJgB ^OVUVMI tor J K.tos 0.28 tor <I2J27 ttJJ tor 5 II,m 0.2? LEGEND: uvm •nO^VRBSOMto •eswcmi —^OSMUOM •Myeonura jwtmuT R-^^nrgtAt ofnioi v—MncHtf m TYHCALDETAILF t Aa TVriCAl.S£CnUN A-A wa/wnumTONST) EX IXU$CM1 •fx cuts *curiiB TYPICALSECTION D-B WR/WIHTHSn g o i I 'S I < s=t 'I I 11-s •WJf -_spSt?^. MOTS^lV"" .r—.^o r- O a. r- O <yi 6-3 LU91I^W«B"Iv e e B e ?!- ~s o o o n1 'CO 3 § st»i5"riv ' S»75'?fir ^•rJ3^4 1 ins'iss^a •4 S O 3 O a |rj @ .ssSijJa.i ®la la 5 n 11 3 • k j/EGL Associates,Inc. t*ais COUJRINQ ROM).Unit A < AII:aO>A,CA 9I0M •>-•S •"¥1•TH («?6)76J-3SU «I rot:(se2)2ej-s:.9« lilt nur<xi3i KM 10235 ALTALOMA LLC 7M SILVER VALLEY TRAIL WALNUT,CA917M M m irj» II \f5«i;t tinm iP at ii Ml d ligiHXB-1(3 IS' 163.15' j;<sr B8iy §5^ i 9 ottfLxykft n. nains H W z H > H < w H > n H 2! O o o K> 'f•t.;5 ew^Ujk Avt 1 u**!*» 6 LOT SUBDIVISION 10239 1&TH ST., ALTA LOMA.CA»1TJ7 Tentative Tract Map No.20026 Neighborhood i^eeting Minutes October 3,2016 Attendees Sally Cheng -Representing 10235 Alta Loma LLC,Project Owner and Applicant,five other associates of 10235 Alta Loma LLC were also present at the meeting IMikkl Cavazos - City of Rancho Cucamonga Case Planner Shawn Yu -Representing Hank Jong and EGL Associates,Inc.,Project Civil Engineer 12 Other Neighbors within 660 feet of Radius of the project site were present at the meeting, Location Deer Canyon Elementary School -Multipurpose Meeting Room Meeting Summary The Meeting Started at 7:00PM Applicant Sally Cheng gave a brief introduction of the project Several Neighbors questioned the scope and boundary ofthe project, whichthe Applicant Clarified. Several Neighbors wish to get more information on the Building Designs and market values ofthe proposed homes. The Applicant responded that since this project is still in its early development stage,and NoArchitectural Designs are available yet;these information would be provided inthe next neighborhood meeting when building plans are ready to be submitted. The Meeting ended at approximately 7:30PM EXHIBIT G Item E -10 Kandace R.Thompson 10302 Hamilton Street Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91701 909-367-9609 October 4,2016 Dear NIkki Cavazos - Cityof Rancho Cucamonga, Thankyou for contacting me with your information.Itwas a pleasure to discuss my concern about the proposal for the lot subdivision yesterday evening. My request isto cease any/all proposals)regarding the initiative to eventually build lower Income housing as it decreases the existing neighborhood homes values. Furthermore,to have three more driveways across from Deer Canyon Elementary School would create more congestion on Hamilton Street before and after school and for various events.Over the past sixteen years someone has hit two of my mailboxes,blocked my driveway at the end and sometimes people have actually parked on the driveway because there is no place to park on the street. One of the reasons,Iinitially moved here was due to the neighbors properties having horses or goats.It was a nice way to have some nature and not be all crammed into a space where a neighbor can hear me sneeze.Normally, Iam not one that complains but, this is the exception.Please take this into consideration before more time and monies are spent.Please call or contact me if I can be of further assistance.Thank you. Best Regards, Kandace R.Thompson EXHIBIT H Item E -11 RESOLUTION NO.16-52 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA.APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20026.A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A PARCEL OF 1.67 ACRES.INTO SIX (6) PARCELS,IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL (L) DISTRICT LOCATED SOUTH OF 19™STREET BETWEEN HERMOSA AVENUE AND HAVEN AVENUE;APN:1076-121-03. A.Recitals. 1.10235 Alta Loma,LLC filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTTM20026 as described in the title of this Resolution.Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of October 2016. the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3.All legal prerequisites prior tothe adoption ofthis Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE,it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 26,2016,including written and oral staff reports, together with publictestimony, this Commission hereby specificallyfinds as follows; a. The application applies to a propertya "double-frontage"parcel located between 19th Street on the north and,Hamilton Street on the south.Hermosa Avenue and Haven Avenue are about 950 feet and 1,425 feet to the west and east of the site,respectively:and b. The property has an area ofabout 73,000 square feet (1.67 acres)and is about 224 feet (east to west) by about 325 feet (north to south); and c. The project site is currentlyimproved with a residence,barn and corral; and d. The propertyisbound onthe west and east byresidentialproperties with residential structures.To the north,across 19'^Street,are more single-family properties with residential structures.To the south,across Hamilton Street,is Deer Canyon Elementary School;and e.The zoning of the subject property and allthe properties surrounding the subject property to the west,east,north and south is Low Residential (L)District;and f.The General Plan Land Use designation ofthe projectsite and the properties tothe north,east and west is Low Residential.The General Plan Land Use designation ofthe properties to the south is Schools;and Item E-12 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-52 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTTM20026-10235 ALTA LOMA LLC OCTOBER 26,2016 Page 2 g. The application isforthe subdivision of 1.67 acres of vacant land intosix(6)lotsfor the purposes of developing single family homes. h.The minimum lot area that is required in the Low Residential (L) District is 7,200 square feet. The proposed lots range between 11,723 square feet (Lot5) and 12,427 square feet (Lot 4) in area. The average lot area that is required for this district is 8,000 square feet. The average lot area ofthe proposed lotsis 9,125 square feet. Lotsinthis district are required to have a minimum width of 65 feet and a minimum depth of 100 feet.The proposed lots are about 75 feet in width and 163 feet in depth;and i.The existing structures on-site will be demolished.According to the cultural resources study prepared by.Historic Resource Associates in May of 2016,the property has no prehistoricor historic archaeological sites,features,artifacts, historicbuildingsor historic structures. Nosignificant cultural resources were identified inthe project area. 3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a.The design and layout of the subject tentative tract map will be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code.The project site is being subdivided for the development of residential lots which will be consistent with the proposed Low Residential General Plan Land Use Designation and the Low Residential (L)District. b.The site is physically suitable for the subdivision which will create six (6)residential lots.The project will include vehicle access points offof 19^^Street as well as Hamilton Street and will be designed to accommodate the level of traffic proposed by the development. c.The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat.Environmental studies were submitted and reviewed by staff.Staff concluded that there would not be any significant effect on the environment. d.The tentative tract map is not likelyto cause serious public health problems.The proposed project is for the development of six (6) lots for future residential development which generally do not include the use of hazardous materials. e.The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large,now of record,for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.Access to the property will be from existing public streets. 4.The Planning Department Staff has determined that the Tentative Tract Map Is categorically exempt from the requirements ofthe CaliforniaEnvironmental QualityAct (CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines.The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Flll Development Project)because the project Involves the construction of development within City limits on no more than 5 acres that is substantially surrounded by urban uses.Additionally,approval of the project would not result In any significant effect relating to traffic,noise,air quality,or water quality.Staff reviewed a noise and air quality (including greenhouse gasses)study,biological study, cultural study and an arborist report and concluded that there would not be any significant effect on the environment.Lastly,the site can be Item E-13 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-52 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTTM20026-10235 ALTA LOMA LLC OCTOBER 26,2016 Page 3 adequately served by all required utilities and public services and the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan polices aswell as the applicable zoning designation and regulations.Therefore,Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects)andthe City's local CEQA Guidelines. 5.Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1,2.3,and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1)Approval is to subdivide a parcel of 1.67 acres,into six (6)parcels,in the Low Residential (L)District located south of 19'^Street between Hermosa Avenue and Haven Avenue;APN:1076-121-03. 6.The Secretary to this Commission shall certify tothe adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca,Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett,Secretary 1,Candyce Burnett,Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26thday of October 2016,by the following vote-to-wit: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN:COMMISSIONERS: Item E -14 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project#:SUBTT20026 Project Name:Tract 20026 Location:10235 19TH ST -107612103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract IVlap ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The proposed action (site demolition and construction)should be scheduled to occur outside the migratory bird nesting season (Feb.1-Aug.31st).In the event construction must occur during the nesting bird season, a qualified biologist should conduct a nesting bird survey no more than 10 days before the start of construction,if the biologist determines that there are active nests,appropriate buffers will be established for each nest and no work will occur inside the buffer of an active next until the fledglings are no longer dependent on the nest or until the biologist otherwise determines the nest is inactive. 2.Standard Regulatory Requirments All clearing,grading,earth moving or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas where the project area watered at least three times daily during dry weather.Watering,with complete coverage of disturbed areas,shall occur at least three times a day,preferably in the mid-morning,afternoon , and after work is done for the day. The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are reduced to 16 miles per hour or less. standard Conditions of Approval 3.Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community,Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 4. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans,architectural elevations,exterior materials and colors,landscaping,sign program,and grading on file in the Planning Department,the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 5.The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City,its agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval.The applicant shall reimburse the City,its agents,officers,or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City,its agents,officers,or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action.The City may,at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. www.CityofRC.us Printed;10/18/2016 Item E -15 Project#:SUBTT20026 Project Name:tract 20026 Location:10235 19TH ST -107612103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department standard Conditions of Approval 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $60.00.All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 7. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire,unless extended by the Planning Commission,unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Traffic Engineering 19th Street frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Secondary"street standards as required and including: Protect or replace curb & gutter, sidewalk, 9500 lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, signing and striping as required. Driveway approach shall be in accordance with City Street Design Policy including the design of circular driveways or hammerhead driveways. Hamilton Street frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Local"street standards as required and including: Protect or replace curb & gutter, install sidewalk, 5800 lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, signing and striping as required. Driveway approaches shall be in accordance withthe CityDrivewayPolicy. 2. For pads below streets,the first 6 feet of the driveway should slope away from the right-of-way (back ofsidewalk) elevation at no more than 6%. 3.A separate permit must be pulled through the Engineering Department for a Construction Permit for the work within the Public RIght-of-Way (subject to fees /approval) 4. Revise existing street improvement plans (DWG 1064 & 681) to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.Street improvement plans,including street trees and street lights shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Plan check fees applicable 5. PRIOR TO FINAL MAP RECORDATION- The existing structure located on proposed lots 4 & 5, must be removed.Demolition permit applicable inadditionto all other related permits. standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Printed;10/18/2016 Page 2 of 10 Item E -16 Project#:SUBTT20026 Project Name:Tract 20026 Location:10235 19TH ST -107612103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDmONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 6.A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form tiie appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first.Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. SLD1 SLD2 LMDI 7.Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010,no person shall make connections from a source of energy,fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless,in addition to any and all other codes,regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit,the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval,as determined by the City Engineer,provided that reasonable,safe and maintainable access to the property exists.In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings,structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.usPrinted:10/18/2016 Pagg 3 Item E-17 Project#:SUBTT20026 Project Name:Tract 20026 Location:10235 19TH ST -1076-12103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract iVIap ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 8. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows.The completed legend (box below)and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans.Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating': "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on DWG 1064 Sheet 5.Where public landscape plans are required,tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans." Street Name Hamilton St Botanical Name Common Name Lavender Crepe Myrtle Min.Grow Space Spacing 20'o.c Size 24"box Qty. TBD Street Name 19th St Botanical Name TBD Common Name TBD Min.Grow Space TBD Spacing TBD Size TBD Qty. TBD Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are .to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector.Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 9.The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 10.Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water,gas, electric power,telephone,and cable TV (all underground)in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 11.Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD),Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino.A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first.Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/18/2016 Page 4 of 10 Item E-18 Project#:SUBTT20026 Project Name:Tract 20026 Location:10235 19TH ST -107612103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Enqineering Services Department standard Conditions of Approval 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits,a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program.The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50%of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from iandfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City.Permits issued on or after June 2,2014,must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2,2014,require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement:a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the'deposit amount,and all weight tickets.Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us,under City Hall;Engineering;Environmental Programs. 13. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the final parcel map,stating that they will be completed upon development for: Hamilton St &19th Street 14. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees:"All improvements within the public right-of-way,including street trees, shall be Installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans,the street improvement plans will govern. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Tract Map and Development Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes.The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers.A soils report is required for new structures. Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards,and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review.Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report.(SMA 66490). 3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan,appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed,submitted,and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/18/2016 Page 5 of10 Item E-19 Project#:SUBTT20026 Project Name:Tract 20026 Location:10235 19TH ST -107612103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 4. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill.The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed bya California licensed Civil Engineer priorto the issuance ofa grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit.All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 6. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review,the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s)on property line{s)or provide a detail(s)showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset fromthe property line. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property.All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit.The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 10.The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided In the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information forGrading Plans and Permit". 12.Grading Inspections:a)Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting.The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures,etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading Inspections prior to continuing grading operations:i)The bottom of the over-excavation;ii) Completion of Rough Grading,prior to issuance of the building permit;ill)At the completion of Rough Grading,the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter)an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record;iv)The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved priorto the issuance ofa building permit. www.CityofRC.usPrinted:10/18/2016 Page 6 of10 Item E -20 Project#:SUBTT20026 Project Name:Tract 20026 Location:10235 19TH ST-107612103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 13.Prior to issuance of a wall permit,on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heei at the adjacent off-site property (I.e.a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 14.Prior to issuance of a wall permit,a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 15.,Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit,the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan)set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3,CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 16.Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner{s)for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property.The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set.The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 17.A drainage study showing ,a 100-year,AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage (for each individual lot)shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for ,on-site storm water drainage prior recordation of the final map. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed,by the Engineer of Record.In addition,the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 18.Prior to the recordation of the final map all cross lot drainage devices shall be constructed over,on, upon,each individual lot.^ 19.Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive.The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps,and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. Thisshallbe shown on the gradingand drainage plan prior to issuance ofa grading permit. 20.Private sewer,water,and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code.Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 21.Prior to the recordation of the final map, the public sewer line in Harhilton Street shall be constructed,along with the sewer laterals serving lots 4, 5, and 6, and the sewer laterals under lots 4, 5,and 6 serving lots 1, 2 and 3. 22.Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP)stormwater treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 23.Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP),the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. www.CityofRC.usPnnted:10/18/2016 Page 7of10 Item E -21 Project#:SUBTT20026 Project Name:Tract 20026 Location:10235 19TH ST -107612103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract IVIap ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 24. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP)has been deemed "Acceptable".Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 25.PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:The proposed tentative map 20026 is proposing a land division only with a note "NO GRADING PROPOSED".The USEPA regulations include the term "common plan of development or sale"to ensure that acreage within a common project does not artificially escape the permit requirements because construction activities are phased,split among smaller parcels,or completed by different owners/developers".In keeping with the intent of this USEPA regulation the applicant Is required to submit a final project-specific water quality management plan with the final map. As development of each lot is unknown at this time, the applicant shall use the maximum allowed lot coverage per the zoning requirements to calculate the design capture volume (DCV) for each lot and provide a typical structural storm water treatment device meeting low impact development (LID)principles for each lot as the lot develops in the future. 26. Prior to the recordation of the final map the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned,to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set,and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 28. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s)as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 29.The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices,commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project.All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 31. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee,and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the recordation of the final map. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/18/2016 Page 8 of 10 !tem E -22 Project#;SUBTT20026 Project Name:Tract 20026 Location:10235 19TH ST -107612103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWiNG CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 32. Prior to the start of landscaping operations,the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner,City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department.The weed barrier shall be permeable. 33. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document,and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device.If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision,prior to the sale of the residential lot,the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s)as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP).At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris.All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP"section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 35. Prior to recordation of the final map the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H:Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII -Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations,..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D,Table VII.3:Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 36. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 37. The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)may be prepared as a Phased WQMP and may include all phases of the project.Construction of the storm water treatment structural devices may be constructed as construction progresses. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/18/2016 Page 9 of10 Item E -23 Project#:SUBTT20026 Project Name;Tract 20026 Location;10235 19TH ST-107612103-0000 Project Type:Tentative Tract iVIap ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDiTIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section standard Conditions of Approval 38.PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE FINAL MAP:As structural storm water treatment devices (commonly referred to as BMP's) are proposed in the rear yards of the residential lots,the developer/applicant is conditioned to provide access easement (s)in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to allow City staff access for inspections of the structural storm water treatment devices. Said easements may be shown on the Final Map,the Parcel Map or by a separate easement document.As an alternative, the CC&R's may be written to require the Homeowner's Association to inspect and maintain the BMP's on an annual basis and provide a BMP inspection and maintenance report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Programs Manager annually. 39. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official,or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator,City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 40. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4)Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality.The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. www.CityofRC.usPrinted:10/18/2016 PagelOoflO Item E -24 Staff Report Planning Department DATE:October 26,2016 ^RaE^HO(JUCAMONGA TO:Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM:Candyce Burnett,City Planner BY:Jennifer Nakamura,Associate Planner SUBJECT:ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2015-01174 -4TH AND MILL.- A request for live entertainment at 4th &Mill Bar,Pizzeria and Grill,within the Mixed Use Retail (MUR)zone of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan located at 11260 4th Street.Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt under Section 15301 as a Class 1 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. RECOMMENDATION:Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Entertainment Permit DRC2015-01174 through the adoption ofthe attached Resolution ofApproval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A.Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: Project Site - Mixed Use Retail (MUR),Empire Lakes Specific Plan North - Mixed Use Retail (MIJR),Empire Lakes Specific Plan South -4''^Street - Cityof Ontario East - Mixed Use Retail (MUR),Empire Lakes Specific Plan,Milliken Avenue West - Mixed Use Retail (MUR), Empire Lakes Specific Plan B.General Plan Designations: Project Site - Mixed Use North -Mixed Use South - City of Ontario East -Mixed Use West -Mixed Use C. Site Characteristics:The project site is located within the mixed use multi-tenant retail development located on Milliken Avenue and 4^^Street. The restaurant,previously known as Boston's has been under new ownershipand renamed 4^^and Mill Barand Grill.The restaurant is approximately 6,500 square feet, witha 500 square foot outdoor patio. To the north of the site isThe Reserve at Empire Lakes apartment community.4^^and Mill is approximately295 linear feet from the nearest building in the apartment community. D.Parking Calculations:The parking requirements for this center were analyzed during the original entitlement process.The addition of entertainment to the existing use does not increase the area of the restaurant or require additional parking be provided. Item F -1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-01174-4^^and Mill October 26.2016 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A General:4'^and Mill advertises itselfas a local sports bar and grill that has been in operation under the current ownership since September,2015.Previously,Boston's occupied this space. They serve lunch and dinner as well as beer,wine and distilled spirits.According to the applicant,the restaurant's primary entertainment is derived from broadcasting live sports events on televisions installed throughout the restaurant,which does not require an entertainment permit.The purpose of obtaining an Entertainment Permit is to have live entertainment asa "fill in"option during times when there are few or no televised sports events available.The applicant proposes to provide entertainment consisting of karaoke,amplified comedy performances (i.e. open mic night)as well as amplified music with a disc jockey or live band with dancing.The dance floor will be limited to 144square feet.The location ofthe proposed entertainment is shown on Exhibit B. B.Hours of Operation/Activity:The applicant initially proposed entertainment Monday'through Thursday from 7:00 p.m.until closing,which is 2:00 a.m.;Friday and Saturday from 9:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.and Sunday from 11:00 a.m.to 3:00 p.m.and 9:00 p.m.to 2:00a.m.Staff raised concerns with the applicant about ending entertainment at the same time that the restaurant wasduetocloseand they revised their application toend entertainment at 1:15 a.m.,providing a gradual wind down of services prior to closing.Staff feels that ending entertainment at the top of the hour is easier for both the applicant and the City to track,should issues arise,and have included within the conditions of approval that all entertainment must cease at 1:00 a.m. The applicant has agreed to this condition. C.Security Procedures:The applicant has submitted a security plan which will include restricting access to the restaurant after 10:00 p.m.to patrons 21 and older,with security guards on site to conduct ID verification and patrol the interior and exterior ofthe restaurant,as well as the parking lot. D.PublicSafety: Staff contacted the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for comment on the proposed entertainment permit.They have reviewed the application andhave no objections to adding entertainment tothe existing restaurant use.They have recommended increasing the patrols ofthe exterior ofthe building and parking lot from oncean hour to every 30 minutes as well as having a security guard patrolling the parking lot constantly for 30 minutes after closing to ensure patrons leave in an orderly fashion and do not disturb the adjacent residential community.These havebeen Incorporated Into the conditions of approval. E. Land Use Compatibility:The use is consistent with the development district of the site.The restaurant is within a commercial complex along a major commercial corridor,if operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences,businesses,or operations including but not limited to noise,loitering,parking or disturbances,the Entertainment Permit can be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible modification,suspension or revocation ofthe permit. F. Environmental Assessment:The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines.The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 -Existing Facilities - which covers the permitting of Item F -2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2015-01174-4^^and Mill October 26,2016 Page 3 existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing atthe time of the lead agency's original determination.The project consists of allov\/ing for live entertainment that does not require an expansion or significant change to the existing pad building.Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE:This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on October 13,2016,the property was posted,and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius ofthe project site. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Burnett City Planner CB:JN/ls Attachments:Exhibit A -Aerial Photo Exhibit B -Floor Plan Exhibit C - Operation Statement and Security Plan Draft Resolutionof Approval forEntertainmentPermit DRC2015-01174 Item F -3 - tliFiiiiTi/Ej 5:%Mr^' EXHIBIT A Aerial Photo i,^•••'-"wssni IB ,-L iiT ^*i f*Pif •T'ri Item F -4 ,J •'fi-*"-if.,;f Proposed Entei1a;rimcnf -ocation ^?H.ap « m X I n H 00 I «-n Tables to be removed to storage areas during entertainment events 4TH &MILL BAR AND GRILL —i- i..li m klTCHEM SERMNC STATIW aj/I.'11^4^4)!5,3i"L L..h Icl 1321 \^\6 gLa c SMiaiB siiigp sni^ Biia stia ^DMKEAFXA ijT 1 «r [0(o ..-v------ -—I l^ES j 1MEWS MM lABLf STORAGE y'sTORACE 4IROOMr-. /.V •"U POOL table: POOL TAfiLE •Sff CREETIR ^ATKN I »WJ»<HWt stnniTT occK msim 3)crp 'lix 5 €|c U)trpi E f<e e f e r o 6149 Bluffwood Drive •Riverside,CA 92506 •Fax 951-682-2876 Cell 951-533-2934 -keefergard@gmail.com 4*^and Mill Entertainment Permit Request The following request is being made for entertainment atthe 4^^and establishment located at 11260 4*^Street,Rancho Cucamonga.Currently,the hours of operation are from 11am to 2am,7 days a week.4^^and Mill hasa full menu (see attached),as well as a full bar (ABC License Types 47 -on-sale general /eating place;and 58 -catering). During the hours of entertainment,certain tables and chairs will be removed from the dining area and placed in storage within the restaurant.There will be two areas designated for entertainment purposes,a dance area and a performing area.A DJ booth /Karaoke area will also be utilized during certain evenings. Those areas,are designated on the floor plans.The dance/performing area areas will be 144 square feet in total;approximately 3% of the total serving area of the establishment.No increase in occupancy load is requested under this Entertainment Permit Request. Entertainment will be divided Into two broad categories:"A"and "B". TYPE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DANCE FLOOR CREATED? AMPLIFIED LIVE MUSIC? SECURITY ON- HAND? COVER CHARGE ? A Karaoke,OR Comedians, OR Poets,OR similar activity No Yes No*No B Anything listed in "A",DJ,OR band Yes*''Yes Yes Yes * A bouncer will be provided every evening after 10pm,regardless of entertainment **EITHER a dance floor OR a band will be provided during entertainment, but not both EXHIBIT C Resubmittal:YesPLANREVIEW DRC2015-01174 Entertainment Permit Submittal Date: P &E Date: 07/25/2016 07/26/2016 Dueto Planner Date Due: 08/17/2016 08/24/2016 Address;112604THST F —6 APN;0210S8102-0000 The following table explains the hoursof operation and the type of entertainment; DAY HOURS OF HOURS OF TYPE OF OPERATION ENTERTAINMENT ENTERTAINMENT* Sunday 11am-2am 11am-3pm;9pm- 1:15am B Monday 11am-2am 7pm-1:15am A Tuesday 11am-2am 7pm-1:15am A Wednesday 11am-2am 7pm-1:15am A Thursday 11am-2am 7pm-1:15am A Friday 11am-2am 9pm-1:15am B Saturday 11am-2am 9pm-1:15am B *These will be typical hours and typical types of entertainment.There may be an occasion (holiday,private party,etc)on a night normally scheduled foran "A" type of entertainment gets elevated toa "B".These are unpredictable,butare not expected tobe more than 2 events per month.4^^and Mill will notify the City at least a week in advance if this is to occur. The security plan is as follows: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) The establishment will beage restricted to 21 and over every evening after 10pm. A bouncer,employed by 4*''and Mill,will be on hand every evening after 10pm. The bouncer will do the following: a.Check ID's atthe door for entry into the establishment after 10p.m.. and limit access to those patrons over 21. Eject unruly customers. Call the police in the event of unwelcome,unwelcome,unruly,or inappropriate behavior A fully licensed and bonded security company will provide 2-3 fully trained,unarmed security guards during "B"typeof entertainment, depending on the needs of the event. The security guards will do the following: a.Check ID's at the door for entry into the establishment after 10p.m., and limit access to those patrons over 21. b.Patrol both the entrances and exits of the establishment approximately once an hour. Patrol the parking lot about once an hour Patrolthe dining area approximately every 90 minutes. Call the police in the eventof unruly,inappropriate,unwelcome,or unruly behavior b. c. Item F -7 Date:7/ 4""and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 To Whom It May Concern: Pasadena Winter Gardens,Inc.Is the landlord at 4*^and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill located at 11260 4^^Street.We acknowledge that DRC2015-01174 has been filed by proprietors ofthis establishment. Subjectto the continued complianceofourtenant with Section 9(b) ofthe Lease, Compliance with CC&R's,and Section 9(c) ofthe Lease,Compliance withLaws, conditions to which we do not have actual knowledge,we authorize 4 and Mill to proceed with this application to obtain necessary permitsforan entertainment license. '>r7 ^'Cjk.'n/^/zh 7 /^ Landlord Date Pasadena Winter Gardens,Inc. Item F -8 Date:j !(j 4^and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill Cityof Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 To Whom It May Concern: 1,. am part owner of 4'^and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill located at 11260 4^^Street.I acknowledge that DRC2015-01174 has been filed by this establishment.We have since hired Keith Gardner,ownerofKeefer Consulting to assist in the processing of this application. I authorize Keefer Consulting to process this application and to obtain necessary permits for the wer^f^descrjbed ab( Part Owner,4'"and Mill Bar, Pizzeria,and Grill D^b "^51^5"6FFen S"/" Ch '^l is 0 Item F -9 4^''and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill Date: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 To Whom It May Concern: I,^•am part owner of 4*^and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill located at 11260 4 Street.I acknowledge that DRC2015-01174 has been filed by this establishment.We have since hired Keith Gardner,owner of Keefer Consulting to assist in the processing of this application. I authorize Keefer Consulting to process this application and to obtain necessary permits for the work described above. Part and Grill '^r~7-rgoz- Item F -10 4^and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill Date: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 To Whom It May Concern: it11260TLsSeet wne .^am pSft owner of 4 and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill located at 11260 4^"_jStfeet.I acknowledge that DRC2015-01174 has been filed by this establishment.We have since hired Keith Gardner,owner of Keefer Consulting to assist in the processing of this application. Iauthorize Keefer Consulting to process^this application and to obtain necessary permits for the work described above. mBapf^izzerla,aJj GrillMill -rz-- .O -rr Item F-11 4^^and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill Date:|^ City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga.CA 91729 To Whom It May Concern: I,/Cx-B.am part owner of 4*^and Mill Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill located at 11260 4 Street.I acknowledge that DRC2015-01174 has been filed by this establishment.We have since hired Keith Gardner,owner of Keefer Consulting to assist in the processing of this application. Iauthorize Keefer Consulting to process this application and to obtain necessary permits for the work described above. J ] Part Owner,4'and MHi^ar,Pizzeria,and Grill POS -I '^4-" &o'y\Tal i'5/0 ; :1131 C/\ Mo. 'Tet-<^0^1 Item F -12 RESOLUTION NO.16-53 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA.APPROVING ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO.DRC2015-01174,A REQUEST FOR LIVE ENTERTAINMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN EXISTING RESTAURANT-4™AND MILL,LOCATED AT 11260 4"^^^STREET;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN:021058102. A.Recitals. 1.Susanne Salazak,Claudia Lopez,Jeremy Sackett and Bon Tai Goo, owners of 4'^and Mill,Bar,Pizzeria,and Grill an application for the issuance of Entertainment Permit No.DRC2015- 01174,as described in the title of this Resolution.Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Entertainment Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of October 2016,the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE,it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1.This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 26,2016,including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony,this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a.The application applies to property located at 11260 4^*^Street,which is part of a contiguous commercial center with a street frontage of 950 feet and lot depth of 500 feet and is presently improved with 5 pad buildings;and b. To the north and west of the subject site is a multi-family residential complex.To the south of is a multi-tenant commercial center in the City of Ontario.To the east is Milliken Avenue and a multi-tenant commercial center;and c.The applicant proposes to provide entertainment consisting of karaoke,amplified comedy performances (I.e.open mic night)as well as amplified music with a disc jockey or live band witli dancing.The dance floor will be limited to 144 square feet;and d.The restaurant serves a full menu of items typical of a full-service restaurant;and Item F-13 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-53 EP DRC2014-01040 October 26,2016 Page 2 e.The operating hours of the restaurant are from 11:00 a.m.to 2:00 a.m.,7 days a week.Entertainment is proposed to be offered Monday through Thursday from 7:00 p.m.until 1:00 a.m.;Friday and Saturday from 9:00 p.m.to 1:00 a.m.and Sunday from 11:00 a.m.to 3:00 p.m.and 9:00 p.m.to 1:00 a.m. and; f.The applicant has submitted a security plan that designates 2 security guards will be onsite during entertainment events with ID scanners for age verification and; g.The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department has reviewed the application and supporting documents and has no objections to adding entertainment tothe existing use. 3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing,and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows; a.That the conduct of the establishment and the granting of the application would notbe contrary tothe public health,safety,morals or welfare;and b.That the premises or establishment is not likely to be operated in an illegal, improperor disorderly manner; and c. That granting the application would not create a public nuisance;and d. Thatthe normal operation ofthe premises would not interfere with thepeace and quiet ofthe surrounding commercial center and adjacent apartment complex;and e. Thatthe applicant has not madeany false,misleading,or fraudulent statement of material fact in the required application. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined thatthe project is categorically exempt from the requirements ofthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines.The project qualifies under as a Class 1 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 -Existing Facilities -which covers the permitting of existing structures that involve negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's original determination.The project consists of allowing for live entertainment that does not require an expansion or significant change tothe existing pad building.Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment.The Planning Commission has reviewedthe PlanningDepartment's determinationofexemption, and based on its own independent judgment,concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1,2,3,and4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application,subject tothe attached conditions of approval and incorporated herein by this reference. Item F -14 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO.16-53 EP DRC2015-01174 October 26,2016 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption ofthis Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26 DAY OF OCTOBER 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca,Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett,Secretary I,Candyce Burnett,Secretary ofthe Planning Commission ofthe City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted bythe Planning Commission ofthe City ofRancho Cucamonga, at a regular meetingof the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of October 2016,by the following vote-to-wit: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN:COMMISSIONERS: Item F -15 Conditions of Approval ) C^^iONGA Community Development Department Project #:DRC2015-01174 Project Name:4th &Mill Bar,Pizza and Grill EP Location:11260 4TH ST -021058102-0000 Project Type:Entertainment Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the follovi/ing Special Conditions 1. Approval is for live entertainment consisting of karaoke,comedians,poets,disc jockey, live band and dancing located at 11260 4th Street. 2. Any modification of intensification of the use such as a revision to the days and hours of entertainment,any improvements such as the expansion of the stage and/or dance floor,and/or other modifications/intensifications beyond what is specifically approved by this entertainment permit shall require review and approval by the Planning Director and/or Planning Commission prior to submitta!of documents for plan check/occupancy,construction,commencement of activity, and/or issuance of a Business License 3.The days and hours of operation for the entertainment shall be limited to Monday through Thursday from 7:00 p.m. until 1:00 a.m.: Friday and Saturday from 9:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.and Sunday from 11:00 a.m.to 3:00 p.m.and 9:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. 4. Adult Entertainment,as defined in Section 17.128.020 of the Development Code,is not permitted. 5.All entertainment activity shall be conducted inside the building.The outdoor patio may not be used to conduct entertainment and sound from -the entertainment shall not be piped to the outdoor speakers. 6.While entertainment is being conducted all doors and windows shall remain closed for noise attenuation purposes. 7.The business operations shall be in compliance with the performance standards that are described in Section 17.66 of the Development Code,including noise limits which are described in Section 17.66.050(G). 8.The business operations shall be in compliance with the regulations and requirements of the California Department ofAlcoholic Beverage Control that apply to Type 47 Liquor Licenses. 9.Access to the entertainment area must be from the main entrance to the restaurant and not from a separate exterior entrance.Other exits shall be used for emergency purposes only. 10. If operation of this Entertainment Permit causes adverse effects upon adjacent residences, businesses,or operations including, but not limited to noise, loitering, parking, or disturbances,the Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration and possible modification,suspension or revocation of the permit. 11. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations.Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 12. The applicant shall submit an annual renewal statement and fee,due on or before January 1 of each and every year,beginning in 2018 per Section 17.20.20(G)of the Development Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/17/2016 Item F -16 Project#;DRC2015-01174 Project Name:4th &Mill Bar,Pizza and Grill EP Location:112604TH ST-021058102-0000 Project Type:Entertainment Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDmONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 13.All signs shall comply with Chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property)of the Development Code and Uniform Sign Program #XXX. 14. Applicant must use an identity card scanner (ID Scanner)anytime the premises is selling alcoholic beverages and has entertainment (Definition of ID Scanner:An ID Scanner automates and documents the age verification process by scanning the ID through a card reader).The ID Scanner should record and timestamp the name,identification number, and date of birth on the identity card provided by patrons. This information should be recorded and maintained for a minimum of thirty (30)days.The business will provide the ID Scanner records to law enforcement upon request. 15.Any patron who (1) fights or challenges another person to fight,(2)maliciously and willfully disturbs another person by loud or unreasoned noise, or (3)uses offensive words which are Inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction shall be removed from the premises. 16. An incident log shall be maintained at the licensed premises on a continual basis with at least one year of entries and be readily available for inspection by a police officer.The log is for recording any physical altercations,injuries,and objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance occurring In, on, or at the licensed premises,including the immediately adjacent area that is owned,leased,or rented by the licensee.The log wili indicate date,time,description of incident, and action taken. "Objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance"means disturbance of the peace,public drunkenness,drinking in public,harassment of passersby,gambling,prostitution,loitering,public urination, lewd conduct,drug trafficking, or excessive loud noise. 17. Security guards shall maintain order and enforce the establishment's no loitering policy and shall take "reasonable steps"(as that term Is defined in subparagraph (3) of Section 24200 of the California Business and Professions Code)to correct objectionable conditions that constitute a nuisance. 18.There shall be no flashing lights,disco lights, or similar lighting during the hours of entertainment that prevents the ability to clearly distinguish and identify patrons, security personnel,or other individuals in the restaurant In order to ensure the safety of patrons. 19. A minimum of eight (8) surveillance cameras shall be installed in the premises as follows:two (2) at the bar area (one on each end);two (2) in the primary dining areas;one (1) at the front door; and one (1)at the stage. 20. Video recordings from surveillance cameras shall be of nothing less than NTSC 4SIF with a minimum of 704X480 resolution.A minimum of 30 days surveillance video shall be kept. 21.The uniform of the security guards shall have the word "Security" clearly visible on it. 22.All managers,bartenders,and servers shall complete the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD)Program offered by the California Department of Alcohol Beverage Control within 30 days of being hired. 23. Any proposed floor plan,seating,occupancy and/or furnishing changes must be submitted to Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for review and approval. Do not Increase the approved occupant load. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/17/2016 Page 2of3 Item F-17 Project#;DRC2015-01174 Project Name:4th &Mill Bar,Pizza and Grill EP Location:11260 4TH ST -021058102-0000 Project Type:Entertainment Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 24.During times of entertainment,a security guard shali patrol the exterior of the building and parking lot at a minimum once every 30 minutes.After close of business,a security guard shall patrol the parking lot constantly for 30 minutes after closing to ensure patrons leave inan orderly fashion. I standard Conditions of Approval 25. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,officers, or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval.The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents,officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents,officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 26. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00.All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. Fire Prevention /New Construction Unit standard Conditions of Approval 1. An increase in occupant load is not permitted. Any construction work needed for the new use will plans to be submitted for plan check and permit issuance before construction work starts. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/17/2016 Page3of3 Item F -18