Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-23 - Resolutions - Approving Degin Review, Located At 6563 East Ave RESOLUTION NO. 16-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00589, A DESIGN REVIEW FOR 10 LOTS WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, SOUTH OF THE 210-FREEWAY, LOCATED AT 6563 EAST AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0227-071-17. A. Recitals. 1. GFR Homes filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2015-00589 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 27th day of April 2016 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 27, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 5.0-acre site at the southeast corner of East Avenue and Fisher Drive, located at 6563 East Avenue, and is presently improved with the Ernst Mueller House, a local historic landmark, and the temporary Saint Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church building in the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and b. The properties to the east, west, and south of the project site are developed with single-family residential homes; the property to the north is the 210- Freeway; and c. The project site is rectangular in shape with an east-west dimension of approximately 380 feet and a north-south dimension of approximately 770 feet; and d. The site is located within the Low(L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP), which permits a maximum density of 4 dwelling units per acre, with an average lot size of 15,000 and a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. Lots within the 11-lot proposed subdivision range in size from 13,387 square feet to 19,054 square feet, with an average lot size of 15,469 square feet, at a project density of 2.21 dwelling units per acre; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-23 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00589 —GFR HOMES April 27, 2016 Page 2 e. The Ernst Mueller House, a local historic landmark, will remain in place and will be situated on Lot 5 within SUBTT19968, the remaining ten (10) lots will be developed with single- family homes. The project proposes four (4) distinct floor plans, Plans 1, 2, 2R, and 3, and two (2) elevations per floor plan, including both Spanish Colonial and Craftsman designs. Floor plans range in size from 3,208 square feet to 3,995 square feet. Plans 1 and 2 are single-story elevations, Plan 3 is a two-story elevation. The mix of proposed homes includes seven (7) single- story and three (3) two-story floor plans; and f. The design review project complies with all applicable development standards of the ESP ad the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (RCDC); and g. A Neighborhood Meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the site. The meeting was held at Summit Intermediate School on January 27, 2016. Several property owners attended and asked questions regarding the timing of construction, floor plan size, anticipated sales price, and street connections; and h. The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on February 16, 2016 and recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission; and i. This application was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan in that the project site is residentially zoned and is being subdivided for residential purposes. The project site is being developed with 10 single-family homes, and 1 retained local historic landmark, within an 11-lot residential subdivision with a project density of 2.21 dwelling units per acre, within the permitted density range of 2 to units per acre; and b. That the proposed design is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that the proposed parcels are being subdivided for residential purposes and will be of similar size and density to those in the surrounding area. The proposed subdivision is designed consistent with the existing single-family residential properties to the east, south, and west of the project site; and c. That the proposed design is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan including project density, setbacks, landscaping, and lot coverage; and d. That the proposed design, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that the lots will be used for residential development in accord with the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-23 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00589—GFR HOMES April 27, 2016 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based on is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2016. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-23 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015-00589 —GFR HOMES April 27, 2016 Page 4 BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: ICOPkiu Candyc urnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of April 2016, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Conditions of Approval RA NCHO �',UCAMONONGA eve CommunityDevelopment Department pment Project#: DRC2015-00589 CEQA2015-00022 Project Name: Design Review for 11 lots Location: 6563 EAST AVE -022707117-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The design of the proposed freestanding garage for the Ernst Mueller House shall be subject to design Review Committee approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The garage design shall match the design, materials, proportion, scale, and colors of the Ernst Mueller House. 2. Tree Removal Permit DRC2016-00292 shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of any permits. 3. All Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures contained in the Planning Commission Resolution of Approval for SUBTT19968 shall apply. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 6. In those instances requiring long term monitoring (i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Director prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. 7. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Project#: DRC2015-00589 CEQA2015-00022 Project Name: Design Review for 11 lots Location: 6563 EAST AVE - 022707117-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 9. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,260.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 10. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 11. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 12. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 13. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 14. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 15. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 16. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 17. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 2 of 9 Project#: DRC2015-00589 CEQA2015-00022 Project Name: Design Review for 11 lots Location: 6563 EAST AVE- 022707117-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 18. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 19. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 20. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 21. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 22. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 23. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 24. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with Certificate of Appropriateness No. . Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Certificate of Appropriateness subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. 25. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 26. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 27. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 28. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 3 of 9 Project#: DRC2015-00589 CEQA2015-00022 Project Name: Design Review for 11 lots Location: 6563 EAST AVE - 022707117-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 29. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 30. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall be in conformance with the City's Development Code Chapter 17.80. 31. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 32. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 33. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The existing overhead utilities on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole off site south of the south project boundary to the end of line pole near the north edge of the historical residence. All services crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time. 2. Dedicate an additional 11 feet along the East Avenue frontage, bringing the total to 44 feet measured from the street centerline, including corner cutoff right-of-way at Fisher Drive. 3. East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Widen the street to 32 feet measured from the street centerline. b. The 20-foot widening will include relocating the curb return and access ramp at the southeast corner of East Avenue and Fisher Drive. c. Provide curb and gutter, 5-foot sidewalk, streetlights, signing and striping as required. d. Existing driveway on East Avenue for the historical residence shall be removed. Driveway for proposed Lot 5 shall take access from the interior street. e. Walls along East Avenue to be consistent with Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 4 of 9 Project#: DRC2015-00589 CEQA2015-00022 Project Name: Design Review for 11 lots Location: 6563 EAST AVE -022707117-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. Proposed interior street improvements to be in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan and City "Local" standards as required and including: a. Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, curb cores, street trees, streetlights, signing and striping as required. b. Knuckle to be in accordance with City Standard Plan 110. c. Historical residence on Lot 5 shall take access from the proposed local street. 5. Vacate or abandon the offer of dedication for extending Whitestone Place to Fisher Drive. 6. Street improvement plans, prepared by a registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed in public rights-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's office. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a City construction permit. 7. Prepare plans for the publicly maintained landscaping outside the perimeter walls on East Avenue and Fisher Drive. Incorporate attractive, low maintenance designs, consistent with Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to final map approval. 9. Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to final map approval. 10. Attached or detached dwelling units that provide complete independent living facilities for sleeping, eating, cooking and sanitation will be treated as second dwelling units for the purpose of development impact fees required prior to building permit issuance 11. Show low rock planter wall and tall block wall in plan view along East Ave and S/E corner of East and Fisher. Show low rock planter wall at back of sidewalk in section A-A to be consistent with the plan view and landscape plan. Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. Match existing species to the south and east, if still on the list of approved street trees. 13. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 14. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 11 feet on East Avenue, bringing total to 44 feet. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 5 of 9 Project#: DRC2015-00589 CEQA2015-00022 Project Name: Design Review for 11 lots Location: 6563 EAST AVE - 022707117-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 16. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 17. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 18. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 19. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 20. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40 percent) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 21. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: Fisher Drive and East Avenue, except for the Lot 5 frontage. 22. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 6 of 9 Project#: DRC2015-00589 CEQA2015-00022 Project Name: Design Review for 11 lots Location: 6563 EAST AVE - 022707117-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 7 of 9 Project#: DRC2015-00589 CEQA2015-00022 Project Name: Design Review for 11 lots Location: 6563 EAST AVE -022707117-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: East Avenue-foreground / background Botanical Name: Eucalyptus sideroxylon "Rosea"/Geijera parviflora Common Name: Red Ironbark/ Maidenhair Tree Min. Grow Space: 6 feet/5 feet Spacing: 30 feet on center/20 feet on center Size: 15 gallon Qty.: TBD Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 25. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 26. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 27. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 8 of 9 Project#: DRC2015-00589 CEQA2015-00022 Project Name: Design Review for 11 lots Location: 6563 EAST AVE -022707117-0000 Project Type: Design Review CEQA Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 28. Fisher Drive was constructed by the City and is acceptable to remain as is. Existing frontage improvements shall be protected in place. a. Install cobble between the existing curb adjacent sidewalk and the proposed perimeter wall and remove the existing tubular steel fence. b. Sidewalk on Fisher Drive shall provide 4 feet of clearance around existing streetlights. Raised portion of the existing retaining wall shall be cut down to be flush with the sidewalk. c. Existing rights-of-way shall be vacated to the street side face of the perimeter wall. A storm drain easement for the existing CSP shall be provided on the final map www.CityofRC.us Printed:4/20/2016 Page 9 of 9