HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-60 - Resolutions - Design Review, Located On Rolling Pastures RESOLUTION NO. 16-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW
NO. DRC2016-00724, A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN REVIEW OF 11 HOMES
ON VACANT LOTS IN TWO EXISTING SUBDIVISIONS IN THE VERY
LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC
PLAN, LOCATED ON ROLLING PASTURES PLACE, WEST OF EAST
AVENUE, AND SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE (SUBTT16113, LOT 5),
AND ON HUNT CLUB DRIVE AND PINTO PLACE, EAST OF EAST
AVENUE, AND SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE (SUBTT16114, LOTS 7-
16), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0225-
012-07, THRU -16 AND 0225-811-05.
A. Recitals.
1. Griffin Residential filed an application for the approval of Design Review No.
DRC2016-00724, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the
subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application."
2. On the 14th day of December, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho
Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date.
3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
B. Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning
Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:
1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,
Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.
2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting on December 14, 2016, including written and oral staff reports, this
Commission hereby specifically finds as follows:
a. The application applies to 11 vacant residential lots in two existing subdivisions
in the Very Low(VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, with 1 lot located on Rolling
Pastures Place, west of East Avenue, and south of Wilson Avenue (SUBTT16113, Lot 5), and 10
lots located on Hunt Club Drive and Pinto Place, east of East Avenue, and south of Wilson Avenue
(SUBTT16114, Lots 7-16); and
b. The property to the north of SUBTT16113, Lot 5, is vacant, the property to the
east, south, and west are developed with single-family homes, and all are located within the Very
Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
c. The property to the north of SUBTT16114, Lots 7-16, are vacant and located in
the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda
Specific Plan, the property to the south is developed with Creek Side Park and is in the Very Low
(VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the property to the east is vacant and is
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-60
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00724 —GRIFFIN RESIDENTIAL
December 14, 2016
Page 2
located in the Open Space (OS) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the property to the
west is developed with single-family homes and is in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the
Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
d. On October 25, 2016, the applicant conducted a neighborhood meeting to inform
the surrounding neighborhood residents of the proposed project and to obtain their feedback and
two adjacent residents attended the meeting; and
e. The project design meets or exceeds the development standards of the Etiwanda
Specific Plan; and
f. The design of the single-family homes accomplishes a 360-degree architectural
treatment by the application of complementary primary and secondary materials and architectural
elements to all sides of the dwelling units; therefore, the architectural design of the project meets
the design goals of the General Plan, Development Code, and Etiwanda Specific Plan.
3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-
referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above,
this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows:
a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and
b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and
the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and
c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the
Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and
d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements in the vicinity.
4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all
written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the
Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is
required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the
review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations:
a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local
CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on June 27, 2001 in
connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16113 and on April 26, 2006,
in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114. Pursuant to CEQA
Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is
required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i)
substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the
environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project
was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new
important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously
considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different
mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts; and
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 16-60
DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00724 — GRIFFIN RESIDENTIAL
December 14, 2016
Page 3
b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Design Review DRC2016-
00724, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have
not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous
Mitigated Negative Declarations. The applicant submitted updated Biological, Air Quality, and
Greenhouse Gas Reports to verify that no biological conditions have changed on the project site,
that the proposed project will remain below air quality and greenhouse gas thresholds, and that
no additional mitigation measures are required. Staff further finds that the project will not have
one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declarations, not
have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation
measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant.
The updated Biological, Air Quality, and Greenhouse Gas Reports verify that no project conditions
have changed that warrant any additional mitigation measures be required; and
c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission
concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant
to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Design Review DRC2016-00724.
5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above,
this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth
below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2016.
PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
BY:
Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman
bx.N\x
ATTEST:
Candy Burnett, Secretary
I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and
adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of
the Planning Commission held on the 14th day of December 2016, by the following vote-to-wit:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
.n
Conditions of Approval
VA.]•
xw<'110 Community Development Department
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR ///Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL - 022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. Approval is for a residential design review of 11 single-family homes on vacant lots in two existing
subdivisions in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on
Rolling Pastures Place, west of East Avenue, and south of Wilson Avenue (SUBTT 16113, Lot 5),
and on Hunt Club Drive and Pinto Place, east of East Avenue, and south of Wilson Avenue (SUBTT
16114, Lots 7-16).
2. All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-69 approving Tentative Tract
Map SUBTT16113 shall apply.
3. All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 05-45 approving Design Review
DRC2004-01107 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16113 shall apply.
4. All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-70 approving Tentative Tract
Map SUBTT16114 shall apply.
5. All applicable conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 06-46 approving Design Review
DRC2005-00401 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16114 shall apply.
Standard Conditions of Approval
6. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the
street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper
wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy
(fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official review
and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits.
7. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment,
detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Department review and
approval prior to issuance of Building Permits.
8. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its
agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to
relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees,
for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be
required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate
at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve
applicant of his obligations under this condition.
9. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval, Conditions of Approval, and all
environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information
only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet
sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR/// Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL- 022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
10. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of
Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the
Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or
within 5 days of the date of project approval.
11. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced
within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.
12. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously
maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and
occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be
conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition.
13. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development
Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street
trees and slope planting.
14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in
the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and
submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for
the development. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the
landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services.
15. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of
mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for
mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the
overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Department review and approval prior to the
issuance of Building Permits.
16. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all
other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in
effect at the time of Building Permit issuance.
17. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than
wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency.
18. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots
for Planning Department and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited
to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of
construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing.
19. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local
Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of
10 feet.
20. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include
Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in
the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and
the Etiwanda Specific Plan.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016 Page 2 of 10
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR///Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL- 022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
21. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or
hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that
equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services
Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B.
22. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a
distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street.
Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official.
23. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails,
construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face
double sided block, `slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review
Committee.
24. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and
State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be
submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services
Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final
acceptance granted prior to occupancy.
25. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for
consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building,
etc.), or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first.
26. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry.
27. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured
products.
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. Trimark Pacific, developer of Tract 16113, made a deposit of $250,880.00 for Wilson Avenue
frontage improvements; City receipt number 55514 dated 6-17-2004. Applicant of DRC2016-00724
shall not be responsible for completion of Wilson Avenue frontage. This deposit of funds will be
held by the City and utilized for construction of Wilson Avenue frontage; either reimbursement to
other developer or the City whoever performs the construction.
2. Some of the street tree species and spacings that were approved last 2006 have been discontinued
and revised last January 2010.
a. Revision to City Drawing Number 2135 shall be required to reflect revised street tree species
and spacing, any relocation of drive approaches and addition of curb cores, if applicable.
b. Plan check/processing fee will be determined at the time of plan check submittal.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016
Page 3 of 10
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR///Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL- 022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
3. The following impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of building permit (fees subject to change
annually): Note that all Etiwanda drainage impact fees were paid in full at time of recordation of the
final maps.
a. Transportation Fee $ 9,002.00
b. Library Impact Fee $ 597.00
c. Animal Center Impact Fee $ 129.00
d. Police Impact Fee $ 178.00
e. Park In-Lieu/Park Impact Fee $ 5,404.00
f. Park Improvement Impact Fee $ 2,633.00
g. Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee $ 1,796.00
4. All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 01-69 and Resolution
No. 01-70 approving Tentative Tract Map 16113 and Tract Map 16114 respectively will continue to
apply.
Standard Conditions of Approval
5. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of
energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for
which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances,
all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and
accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building,
structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the
percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development
approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable
access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or
units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements
required by these conditions of development approval.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016 Page 4 of 10
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR///Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL- 022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Engineering Services Department
Standard Conditions of Approval
6. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall
be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at
least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and
appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must
complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days
following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited.
Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit
reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit
amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site,
www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs.
Building and Safety Services Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions
1. This site is located in the fire area designated VHFHSZ, all structures must be constructed with
ignition resistant or noncombustible materials in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan
and the most current edition of the CA Building Code. When the Development Review is approved
submit complete construction drawings including energy and structural calculations to Building and
Safety for plan review in accordance with the stricter regulations of the approved Fire Protection
Plan for the community and current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. The new structures
are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required for new
structures. Vegetation must be design and installed in accordance with the RCFPD guidelines for
sites located in the fire area.
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code
and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices.
The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved
conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan.
2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform
such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans
shall implement design recommendations per said report.
3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be
completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of
building permits.
4. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects
and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more
of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet
signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016 Page 5 of 10
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR ///Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL- 022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
5. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a
dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s)
shall be located outside of the public right of way.
6. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for
review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading
and Drainage Plan/Permit.
7. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the
adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the
perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line.
8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall
be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private
property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building
Code.
9. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined
exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and
bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official.
10. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond
project boundary.
11. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California
Building Code.
12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format
provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit".
13. Grading Inspections:
a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a
pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the
grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive
measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading
operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector;
b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety
Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to
continuing grading operations:
i) The bottom of the over-excavation;
ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit;
iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit
Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to
be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of
Record;
iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate
Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016 Page 6 of 10
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR/// Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL-022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
14. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site
plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations
between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections
CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of
the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code.
15. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from
the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be
scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title
sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set.
16. The proposed private sewage disposal (septic) system shall be located in the front yard to allow a
future connection to a public sewer main.
17. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall
submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and
elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of
proposed structures and drainage of the site.
18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the following
information in the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fencing per city standards, provide a 4" thick
decomposed granite (DG) surface, provide a drainage V ditch parallel to the trail, provide a bridge
over the V ditch where necessary for access to corals, and gates to corrals. The equestrian bridges
shall be capable of carrying vehicle loads where necessary. Where the longitudinal slope (s) is S<
5% the cross fall shall be 2%, if S>5% the cross fall may be 4% maximum. Where water bars
required, the spacing for the water bars is: 50' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 4% to 6%, 40'
maximum for longitudinal slopes of 6.1% to 9%, 30' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 9.1% to
12%, 20' maximum for longitudinal slopes greater than 12%. In the equestrian trails water bars shall
also be placed at the top and bottom of the trail where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep
downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail.
19. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be
prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm
water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile
gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be
wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study
shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan
storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices.
20. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements
prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
21. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities
adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be
installed prior to final map approval.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016 Page 7 of 10
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR ///Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL- 022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
22. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters
and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent.
This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit.
23. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted
California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and
drainage plan.
24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the
engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan
(WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP).
25. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy
of the project Conditions of Approval.
26. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior
to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Building Official.
27. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of
Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval
by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office.
28. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification
Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan
document.
29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis
for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best
management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan
(WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration
chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
30. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water
treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga
Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in
the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated
with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner.
31. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved
project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports
on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager.
32. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor
shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga
Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016 Page 8 of 10
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR /// Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL- 022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
33. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed
maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm
water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device
maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to
submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site
and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant
shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the
proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the
residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the
residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the
property shall be included within the WQMP document.
34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management
plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of
concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At
a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert
filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance
Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality
management plan.
35. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan
shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet"
located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety
Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water
Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations
for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility
Safety Factors".
36. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have
a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm
water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the
current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality
Management Plans".
37. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil
engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm
Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of
Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department.
38. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the
infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit,
adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect
groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be
evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management
Plan document.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016 Page 9 of 10
Project#: DRC2016-00724
Project Name: DR ///Griffin Residential
Location: 5818 PINTO PL- 022501212-0000
Project Type: Design Review
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:
Grading Section
Standard Conditions of Approval
39. The discretionary permit DRC2016-00724 includes the development of 11 lots over two separate
tracts (Tract 16113 and Tract 16114). Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall
provide a final project-specific water quality management plan which covers all development under
discretionary permit DRC2016-00724.
www.CityofRC.us
Printed:11/30/2016 Page 10 of 10