Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-09-13 - SupplementalsTentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19836 'F-1. Project Description • Applicant: Yousef Audi • Location: Southeast Corner of Wilson Avenue and Winchester Court • Entitlement: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19836 (2 Lot Subdivision) • Project Size: 0.92 Acre of Land • General Plan Designation: Low (L) Residential • Zoning: Low (L) • Density: 2 Dwelling Units per Acre (2 to 4 DU Per Acre Permitted) r 4 *&A" ir qk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subdivision Design • Each parcel exceeds the minimum development requirements of the Low Residential (L) District • The minimum permitted lot size is 7,200 square feet and average lot size is required to be 8,000 square feet • Parcel #1 is 22,526 square feet • Parcel #2 is 17,474 square feet • The project will be required to all install public improvements along Winchester Court and Wilson Avenue • Access for both lots to be taken from Winchester Court • Grading will be similar to the subdivision across the street and the approved subdivision to the south 1 1 3 Recommendations • Adopt the Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19836 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19796 E3 Project Description • Applicant: Harpreet Singh Verma • Location: Northwest Corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Amber Lane • Entitlement: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19796 (2 Lot Subdivision) • Project Size: 2.63 Acres of Land • General Plan Designation: Very Low (VL) Residential • Zoning: Plan • Density: 1 ,,.Permitted) Estate Residential (ER), Etiwanda Specific Dwelling Unit per Acre (.1 to 1 DU Per Acre �� 4� F�., � � Y' `� � w �o���s �L C,7 �� 1E.t �+��yi ia� •'�` ii� �� ��!i� •w� �' ' .+• r'1P� ' . � • ".A �eu a t4.,-�!i'^^bm�'�� . L1h . x `: y:.. �y� -p ., �. e' , "y. �% .••�• 1 f •',A'� v - sAE' sire `9' r `e 511Eat y 16 41 104, toa ,.. '_ A• - � �1AAl.wY1 `7'. + r.4 AM. 1 • ./� " a* w' .s fr zw- �� .a ir�l t �1 ��� 1• M 9 ", , FA OF !V �1 ♦�i g�,r'` ���{e , APIf�'i!" ^�� 47�•\ F- r ♦ dJ H � L - ., ,� i _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Subdivision Design • Each parcel exceeds the minimum development requirements of the Estate Residential (ER) District • The minimum required average lot size of 40,000 square feet • Parcel #1 is 64,877 square feet • Parcel #2 is 50,049 square feet • Project will be required to install public improvements along Etiwanda Avenue and Amber Lane • The existing residence will remain on Lot #1 • Grading and lot layout be similar to the lots to the west Trail Design • The project will include a 15-foot wide equestrian trails adjacent to the north property line • The new segment of trail will connect the existing equestrian trail to the east with Etiwanda Avenue • Access to the trail will be controlled by a vehicle swing gate and equestrian step-thru • Each lot has more than adequate room for a 24-foot by 24- foot corral area that complies with the 70-foot separation requirement for the adjacent dwelling units • The trail layout and design was reviewed and approved by the Trails Advisory Committee meeting on August 9, 2017 X'20CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E IE IT r T FL FEET EITI 1-TE L uC TT _T EITI I TE [IT L a_E E-EET - E T FF - E -1E FTIIF_—E r I _ ❑ —III-TE I I I "I -------III I I I PARCEL 2 ; PARCFIT I I E EF - E- Er - E- — EIT H E I FT r E I 1 r � uIIY u Fig 6• 1 4 t 1 i Z ill � 6 -LT 2 I I E _ I � 1 t r I \ I I I 11 I s e L ------- + l E ITI E-u£T„ E!ll I �Ek7F 1 _TE _ E _ T- 4 L S E F L T FT.EIT E E J L I F I E EE L-TE{ En- - L 1- E Recommendations • Adopt the Resolution of Approval with Conditions for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19796 W NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION SPECIFIC PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .W V - Y� -- -YW up G raiml+ associates t Y _ � ®1 r1...,,,,,,,l,alnll,,. FEHRFPEERS DUDEK I N TI OM A T 100 AL -D_.2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP AGENDA ■ Summary of plan objectives. ■ Overview of challenges and delays of the past 1 %2 years, and how those have further clarified the plan objectives and strategies. • Overview of current vision plan and structure of Specific Plan. • Overview of EIR process. • Questions and input from the Commission. NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION PROJECT PLAN OBJECTIVES 1. Permanent Conservation Permanent urban edge, preserving and restoring the sensitive natural habitats, resources, landscapes and views. 2. Fiscal Sustainability Avoid "patchwork" of fiscally unsustainable neighborhood fragments, prone to natural hazards (wildfires, landslides..) 3. A Center for North Rancho Cucamonga A walkable, bikeable destination with commercial amenities for surrounding neighborhoods, overlooking new preserve, trailhead to Foothills and civic amenities for the whole community. 4. Interconnected Walkable Neighborhoods Spectrum of housing options, from large lot view homes to smaller homes, attached homes, condos and apartments targeted to a broad range of household sizes and types. Lin C RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN KEY OBJECTIVES RELATED TO THIS PLAN ■ Inspire a community culture and lifestyle that embraces health and sustainability • Develop a balanced, integrated, multi -modal transportation system ■ Protect the character and high quality of established residential neighborhoods. ■ Offer missing housing/lifestyle options in new sustainable neighborhoods. • Diversify the employment base and fiscal sustainability • Preserve access to and frame views of the mountains, open spaces and habitat ■ Provide high quality community parks and facilities for all ages and interests AML CHRONOLOGY FALL 2015 TO FALL 2017 Aug to Oct 2015: Prepared initial conceptual plan based on site analysis and City direction, presented to Commission and Council regulatory agencies. ■ Nov 2015 to Mar 2016: In response to regulatory agency input prepared conceptual hydrology study, conducted small mammal trapping, and worked with County Flood Control on updated plan focused on habitat restoration. • Apr to Oct 2016: Met again with regulatory agencies, conducted more detailed hydrology analysis and more detailed bio mapping of Conservation Priority Area. ■ Oct 2016 to May 2017: Met again with regulatory agencies. In response prepared further revised /final plan alternative with substantially larger restoration area in Development Priority Area. • May 2017 to Present: Prepared amended contract and schedule to complete Specific Plan and EIR by spring 2017. c«.,� PLAN PROGRESSION DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY AREA — 11212 AC j— i • Development Priority Area • Original Neighborhood Plan —Oct 2015 _ Y� ■ Increased Conservation Plan — May 2016 it �o f �J- j I I I I r I I Y _ =11 SARGEw' .. :� � � ',r�N �}T ���,, ,�+ ` .� S� '' W.. :< l fi ,�, e ' 5��� � � � / �n _ ,. �; 4 :: } +.. 't. 't i �e6.°w c�' x e b 9. n n _'_ .- �. Y � � .r. .. -x �^'Oi ., a �, ��_ .� � .> �i — .�- - ,,,.a, -� r 1� S .r.y�.� Y � f� . � �'. M ` � � :. I � y ♦' .. x � I � � n.f� �� i Y m� a �rt ,� —�,�.— 5.1 x ♦.,,: So 8 w s Conservation Priority Area r � �------- - - - - - - - - - - ------ - - - - - - - - - - - - .�� Restoration. i 11pIi w ENLARGE/RESTORE SMALL INTERMEDIATE WATERSHED • 7 small sub -watersheds between the very large Deer and Day Creek watersheds • Levee removal planned to allow portions of the flows from the westerly 3 sub - watersheds into the Development Priority Area R. AVAILABLE FLOWS BRAIDED STREAMLETS More detailed mapping of existing braided channels at the top of the alluvial fan S A RG E N T CONSERVATION OF FOOTHILL ENVIRONMENTS OVERALL GOAL Conserve a connected system of biologically viable habitat lands to reclaim natural processes and protect sensitive species. Develop a preserve system that will enhance, protect and maintain ecosystem functions and values. t Provide a consistent regulatory process that allows for efficient permitting of residential and commercial development in appropriate locations. Maintain scenic beauty, natural biological diversity, and compatible recreational opportunities to enhance the local quality of life �Citeuuna Nc�ir En're. o-5r-:[pe Aru ies�n�r. S r._ur Pv.,„ goll10RG ENTNC PLAN PROGRESSION DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY AREA — 1/212 AC ■ Development Priority Area • Original Neighborhood Plan • Increased Conservation Plan • Current Plan — Based on series of meetings with regulatory agencies and extensive biological mapping and small mammal trapping • Existing rock levees provide pre -constructed wildfire protection for town center edges • West Neighborhood in primarily chaparral vegetation type k,. �� SARGENT DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 2016 VS. 2017 - CamervaNan Area 1A Comezvofi Area 10 ~f" I200 °aezJ I �s a (53,9 acres) Neighborhood Development Area Potential t` i 2016 N l_ .rhooa - 75.2.c F TOWN CENTER NFIGHBON000 Open Space/Conservation ±349 acres Utility Easement ±143 acres ,l Developable Area ±720 acres I Total Site Area ±1,212 acres •• Conservation Area]A j. (192.0 acres) r_• �l� EN 3 • Dwelling Unit Total: 31620 3 • DUA Average (Net) 5.02 • '° DUA Average (Gross) 2.99 - 20e" ' All totals subject to approved zoning and entitlement/ _ mitigation plans and agreements ° { ;,,, THE PUBLIC REALM WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOOD STRUCTURE • Streets orient and connect to open spaces framing views of nature and mountains • Neighborhoods with 5-minute walking distance from center to edge. ■ Pedestrian -scale blocks, interconnected street network, off-street trails • Every household within a comfortable, safe 2-minute walk of a small park or playground • Safe comfortable longer walk or bike ride to school and neighborhood shops • Every home within a 5 minute walk of a walking/bike riding trail. R". o' „�, ,., THE PUBLIC REALM PARKS WITH UNIQUE AMENITIES '01SARGENT Y ,Lv a � Ter _Akf 3 i 'ice ' ��►„� -y-- �� - ,� - -- +� 1 k • 19MI:I ] on] 4 BWWMA 1 TRAILHEAD AND SUPPORT FACILITIES IN VILLAGE CENTER A- THE PUBLIC REALM LANDSCAPE CALIBRATED TO CLIMATE AND LOCAL HABITAT 3tlS�RC_N Gnwxa �� i ip YIP `4 1 d - WILSON VILLAGE CENTER MIXED -USE CENTER FOR FOOTHILL COMMUNITY to WILSON AVENUE TOWN CENTER MAIN STREET-ALT 1 A • Low speed, pedestrian -priority environment • Customer parking generates frontage activity • Shade priority, combination trees and buildings 101SARGENT WILSON AVENUE • TY ft CDATERSTREET TYPE 1 - TOWN CENTER STREET (MAIN STREET (VARIATION) D B D A • Low -speed, pedestrian priority environment • Alternative with few trees, buildings provide shade/enclosure • Less parking in front —frequent paseos to rear parking lots iv Am UK����;�:;;.. 70'SARGENT 7 w WILSON VILLAGE CENTER MIXED -USE BUILDINGSWITH WELCOMING FRONTAGES WIT 11- *Wool 9ft AFW I 1 � S �i fll �•�1• � I _� � �`,J .* 7 rt 3� 40 WILSON NEIGHBORHOOD ADJACENT TOWILSON CENTER • Gateways to town center, 2-3 story buildings • Houses, rowhouses, live work, condos, apartments • Range of 10 to 36 dua in highly walkable, amenity - rich environment V ni A, OCR-- '��i SARG ENT C:['CANOtlGA CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD AVENUE EAST WEST © 0 O O 0 • Very similar to north -south avenue • East -west neighborhood spine, density transition v TYPICAL NEIGHBORHOOD STREET ALL NEIGHBORHOODS (WITH VARIATIONS) A ■ Parking lane and parkway strip infiltration typical • Parkway strip and sidewalk dimensions can vary ■ Some hillside streets may have parking one side only g,M„„ ��sae Er,T Ccl'.\\1UM:\ CENTRAL NEIGHBORHOOD (BOTTOM OF BANK) TYPE 5 -EDGE DRIVE (VARIATION -LOWER BANK) • Edge at bottom of 2:1 gravel mine slope • Neighborhood greens on alternate sides ■ Trail along open space edge Ijwon (,WkUll";.a ��ISARGENT .. WILSON NEIGHBORHOOD MIX OF SINGLE- AND MULTI -FAMILY TYPES nml - -r �1IPIU=l (�LW n pi WILSON NEIGHBORHOOD COURTYARD HOUSING WILSON NEIGHBORHOOD COURTYARD HOUSING Live-Wc -i kuor, Cl�_1.W\1.1 `, _ �� '; <� � -�_� _, #����� i .,; 9 tiz �. ., � � „ � � �t�'� . .�y, � .� S � �, 4,.: -- �_ -- - � - __ . r -=_ '":.� ��, ry ,� '• - ': ANC' •V� u � J rIA �. �.�. � O:- _ . ` f �4; ;-�... .�� �u , R:.: '� .'Yi �'ura V �' J • ��+ a �� _. ' �t Y � _ _ � ew'.r ' ,� cy. 2[ 4M: ` ! r #N r4._. /.. . r. ... � � .. - GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL ONLY ■ Single family detached and attached types. ■ Some alley -loaded some not ■ Edges are designed as transitions to adjacent neighborhoods and natural habitat. ,. A. -,ARGENT TYPICAL NEIGHBORHOOD STREET ALL NEIGHBORHOODS (WITH VARIATIONS) I ■ Parking lane and parkway strip infiltration typical • Parkway strip and sidewalk dimensions can vary • Some hillside streets may have parking one side only (C `uYuvcn a. Le. � i ,_, A. .. _,. , 11,..: r SARGENT EDGE DRIVE CONSERVATION OPEN SPACE - ALT 1 a Wj lIm .�. .. _..._�_.�r -._ .rr .._... .... EDGE LANE ALONG FLOOD CONTROL CHANNELS AND UTILITY CORRIDORS 35 !s Pk o .y • Lanes connect street ends to avoid cul de sacs • Homes side onto utility corridors — not conservation areas AM �j,.,-ix -�� SAR'.t i 'IT c<<:,�.,,,.�,r GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD PEDESTRIAN -ORIENTED FRONTAGES _101SARGENT uia .44 GENERAL NEIGHBORHOOD SINGLE-FAMILY ATTACHED HOMES D SARGE NT R AUK t 0%;FEY f r M - 1 n- 1 f � az - HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD LARGER LOTVIEW HOMES • Range from 1 to 3 dua • Houses on lots 80+ feet wide • Large -lot single-family houses • Neighborhood parks and greens; HOA-maintained amenities i 9C� Rn+cu� ��SaRG� n; HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD INCLUDING CUSTOM/SEMI-CUSTOM HOMES �ggti�ruio M.' SA RG E �: PRELIMINARY MARKET POTENTIAL FOR -SALE POTENTIAL • Optimal For -Sale Mix • 14% Condos • 21% Townhouse/Duplex • 24% Low -range Detached • 22% Mid -range Detached • 19% High -range Detached ■ Market Potential • Housing types to appeal to younger, established, and compact families • Relatively low current potential from older households (approx. 15% of total for -sale market, evolving over 5-7 years) • Potential For -Sale Household Mix • 56%Traditional and Non -Traditional Families • 29% Young Singles and Couples • 15% Empty -Nesters and Retirees cU R,S11,-( PRELIMINARY MARKET POTENTIAL RENTAL POTENTIAL • Rental potential is high • Over 42% of total potential market • Market Potential • Primarily comprised of young singles and couples • Secondary demand from older households (approx. 7% of total rental market) ■ Rental Development Pattern • 4-6 Unit buildings in General Neighborhood • Courtyard Buildings in Center Neighborhood and along Creek Park Mixed -Use upper floor condos in Town Center • Potential Rental Household Mix • 60%Young Singles and Couples • 33%Traditional and Non -Traditional Families • 7% Empty -Nesters and Retirees PRELIMINARY MARKET POTENTIAL RETAIL AND RESTAURANT USES ■ Place -Making • SP area lacks adjacency to established retail clusters. • Place -Making strategy to create unique destination will be critically important. ■ Foot -Traffic • Should establish a high level of foot -traffic to attract retail and restaurant uses. • Proximity of retail uses to medium -density housing achieve higher foot -traffic volume. ■ Pedestrian -Oriented Design • Locate within comfortable walking distance of significant concentration of housing to offset retailer perspective of additional risk posed by zero -setback, walkable retail. Y1sne_Er T PRELIMINARY MARKET POTENTIAL RETAIL USES • Grocery • Estimated SP area population will likely support a fresh format or limited -assortment grocery store. • Fresh Format Examples: Sprouts, Viva La Vegan, Whole Foods, Red Tomatoes Farmers Market. Store sizes vary widely. • Limited Assortment Examples: Trader Joes, Aldi. Store sizes up to 20,000 sq. ft. • Restaurants • Cluster of local or regional "transplants" ■ Boutique • Little space for independent, small retail operations in existing Rancho Cucamonga retail clusters. • SP may provide an opportunity for boutique retail if it can generate sufficient foot -traffic. ^A,W III Gt� NUA(:A PRELIMINARY MARKET POTENTIAL OFFICE USES ■ "Remote" location away from activity centers is a disadvantage ■ May be appropriate for small business locations (4-5 employees, 1,000 sq. ft. +- footprints) • Location in walkable town center near high -end housing may help offset remote location • School and collage uses in SP vicinity could be an economic generator that would create demand for support businesses that could locate nearby. LV;4NUV41 IJAO �I PRELIMINARY MARKET POTENTIAL OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL USES ■ Outdoor Entertainment • SP Scenic setting an outdoor venue amenity • Relatively convenient freeway access • Santa Barbara Bowl or Libbey Bowl in Ojai, for example • Challenges: Neighborhood traffic, Noise • Opportunity: Intimate Scale • Tie in with trailhead and recreational access to natural open space k", �'��SARG ENT