The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-06-28 - SupplementalsCUP Modification DRC2017=00482 Gerdau Steel Planning Commission June 28, 2017 .1JC ' DS �Y4X ' 1 119➢1IBM 4. rw it J E I - .. r:i - _ r yt = - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Prior Approval • Project site is currently developed with the existing Gerdau Steel Plant and includes: • 19,049 square feet of office. • 91,113 square feet of manufacturing. • 70,490 square feet of warehouse. • On an 80 acre site. • On January 14, 2009, the Planning Commission approved CUP DRC2008-00512 for the following: • New 16,781 square foot Baghouse (air filtering building). • New 11 778 square foot electrical substation. • New 6,930 square foot Melt Shop canopy. • These improvements were never built. Prior Approval • On December 10, 2014, the Planning Commission approved CUP Modification DRC2013-00992. That approval included: • Reducing the size of the proposed Baghouse from 16,781 square feet to 11,853 square feet. • Reducing the size of the proposed electrical substation from 11,778 square feet to 4,000 square feet. • Enclosing the Melt Shop cupola with a 6,375 square foot Melt Shop canopy. • Constructing a 6,090 square foot addition to the Melt Shop building. �,;;. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,n " �I i PRE ARE i t Site Plan AREA OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS rarer w r uvr T. . — — . — — . — — . — . i Elevations riu a�wo n SITE ELEVATION LOOKING SOUTH AG I., Elevations A-�a Xp SAY • • B 1 I A-_ �`— m.-o- �. nxt _- VW �1 N NMN� rr m ww.r- +e'w mx[Yx � xi-er amll I a�ixt I Iwl[. xar EAST SIDE I •1 f0 [dM.• •'aY li it � Mnmie ,•.� A tots a -ram - Rai40.Y - I ST i < � WEST SIDE Elevations , 0 SOUTH SIDE EXTERFOR ELEVATIWJ sc., r. ve•-ra Elevations Dust Load -out building - Exhaust stack and fans — New Baghouse Melt Stop (existing) f .ew lrrn wuu re cmnwc+m nan amw.no ccn wu- sm..o awn New ductwork�.i=w'.row�`:�c+".+"�`� Melt Shop canopy VIEW LOOq G SOUTHWEST New Slack - Existing Melt Shop Matt Shop addibon - Melt Shop canopy T _V New Baghouse - New substation New Dust Load -out building VIEW LOOI(MO /gRTHEAST ac4E rre Baghouse , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -ems r ..I �i♦ Vt, i R 3 i 1: d a merica _ CorporaLon VigSiia Woods .� -� a Apartments f Arro.R AM co T �I L 7 8 R Lumberr,, r x t L ' ; Bonds4�•,c :, >d RecytFlmB._mail oUinetBai6 • CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Gerdau Steel Street Frontage Street Frontage ZS' Driveway Access a, yV4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Environmental Review • On January 14, 2009, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for DRC2008-00512. On December 10, 2014) an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for DRC2013-00992. Per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration. Recommendation • Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve CUP Modification DRC2017-00482 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. r. JI •cl Pr 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Project Description A proposal to construct an industrial building of 339,000 square feet on a 17 acre site in the General Industrial (GI) District located approximately 1,100 feet north of 6th Street and 395 feet north of the terminus of Santa Anita Avenue. F 9 I r• Background August 13, 2015 — Design Review Submitted May 25, 2016 — Planning Commission • Item Continued December 14, 2016 — Planning Commission • Item Continued June 28, 2017 — Planning Commission -I——L-1--.- . - .--l--1--1. 4—I--a- - SOUTHERN :A_��y_'r—KPy CALIFORNIA EDISON %'i L1MN �1 LL -1 LL-! _ _ I I I IAn. Ircl _li °P�wn rc3u ------------ I .______________ al SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA � d ECISON + .I --------------- SOUTHERN ' CALIFORNIA E OISON PROJECT DATA ZONE: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL SITE AREA. 709,798 SF 16,29 AC FOOTPRINT AREA: 329.000 SF MEZZANINE: 10.000 SF = GROSS FLOOR AREA: 33900 SF W LOT COVERAGE: 46.28 % F.A.R. AUTO PARKING REQUIRED: OFFICE 15,000 SF qt1/250 60 STALLS a MANUF - 15,000 SF 0� 11500 30 STALLS WNSE. - 309,000 SF IST 20.000 SF r6 1/1,000 SF 20 STALLS NEXT 20,000 SF 0112,000 SF 10 STALLS 114,000 SF FOR REMAINING 68 STALLS TOTAL 188 STALLS TOTAL AUTO PARKING PROVIDED 190 STALLS DOCK LOADING DOORS. 36 PROVIDED TRAILER PARKING: 36 PROVIDED LANDSCAPE REQUIRED: 70,798SF / 10% LANDSCAPE PROVIDED. 110,000 SF / 15.5% CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA suit 6 -lw r ra , CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Committee Review Technical Review Committee • February 16, 2016 • Recommended approval Design Review Committee • February 16, 2016 • Recommended approval conditions of approval subject to several added • Equipment screening, employee break area, fencing, walls, gates, decorative paving and paint color. Assembly Bill (AB) 52 Native Communities were contacted to determine interest in engaging in consultation. • City was contacted by: • San Manuel Band of Mission Indians • Concurred with the conditions • Proposed additional text requiring applicant to work with San Manuel to coordinate tribal participation • Saboba Band of Luiseno Indians • No specific concerns • Deferred to San Manuel • No additional comments received Mitigated Negative Declaration • April 20, 2016 - Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration circulated • May 20, 2016 — CDFW letter received • Impacts to sensitive species and natural communities • Adequacy of mitigation measures • Impacts of the project on an existing ephemeral stream. • May 25, 2016 — Continuance requested at Planning Commission Mitigated Negative Declaration • Additional analysis completed • Biological Resources section of IS/MND modified • 1 mitigation measure added • 5 mitigation measures modified • 1 mitigation measure was deleted • CEQA Section 15073.5(a) • Recirculation of IS/MND required when substantially revised. • A new, avoidable significant effect is identified and mitigation measures or project revisions must be added to reduce the impacts to less than significant. Mitigated Negative Declaration • November 7, 2016 — MND recirculated • December 8 & 137 2016 — Lozeau Drury letters received • On behalf of LIUNA • Impacts to biological resources and air quality • December 14, 2016 —Jeremiah George letter received • On behalf of South Coast Chapter of California Native Plant Society • Impacts to biological resources • Cgntinugnce reauestP.d at Planning Commission Mitigated Negative Declaration • January regarding Fly 2017 — USFWS impacts to Delhi presented concerns Sands Flower -Loving • Applicant has addressed all concerns • Additional mitigation measure provided • Existing mitigation measure modified • May 22, 2017 — MND recirculated Mitigated Negative Declaration Based on the findings City staff determined measures there would that the project would the environment. contained in the revised IS, that, with the be no substantial have a significant mitigation evidence effect on Recommendation The Planning Commission: • Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts; and • Adopt the Resolution approving Design Review DRC2015-00797. DRC2017-00437 Appeal of CUP D RC2016-00021 & ME D RC2016-00022 Introduction • Applicant (Appeal): Roger Yuen • Project Description: Appeal of City Planner approval Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00021 & Minor Exception DRC2016-00022. • Location: Haven Village Commercial Center, located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and Lemon Avenue. • Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) • Square footage of Existing Center: 118,264 square feet • Approved Addition: 6,484 square feet _--s Ltee _ %�L�emonA e : ` AL'emcn A e �A September's ' and Eater' Y � T 1 �T y uperculs v •I t i.L . o t Ha, enia r < Del Taco O ATM W B,n4I n vfns m I « vCAS'ri RREGI_T , 'McDonald s' i i, i • �� Traae Joe' I `� 6I Ha�en,Union 76e de °D �: LOy's NeJr.&Spa. / �J 3 Service; frnter - i 6 i ` Corky s Kitchen 1-48akery yam. _01i -. ifI h FIV ' :` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i L i Chronology • January 29, 2009: Planning Commission approved CUP DRC2008-00464, for the construction of a 6,484 square foot addition to the Haven Village Commercial Center. • May 9, 2017: City Planner approved the following entitlements: - Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00021 for the operation of an approximately 1,800 square foot drive -through coffee shop. - Minor Exception DRC2016-00022 for a 4.5 percent reduction in required parking for Haven Village Commercial Center. • May 22, 2017: Appeal filed for City Planner decision of CUP DRC2016-00021 and ME DRC2016-00022. , .1 . r•. �• �. �• i •� -- err s twig; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 r wiw �i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i R iiw� Issues Raised in Appeal • The CC&R's governing the center require consent from all of the property owners within the center prior to submitting an application to the City requesting a parking reduction and that the City cannot interfere with the contractual rights between the property owners. • Additional parking demand within the center will negatively impact the number of available parking spaces for the current tenants including Trader Joe's and Daiso. • The parking analysis relies on parking spaces needed by other tenants in center. • Approval does not state who will pay for the mitigation measure that requires an onsite parking attendant. Haven Village Existing Parking Conditions • Commercial center parking requirement (Pre 1988): 4.5 per 11000 SF • Commercial parking requirement allows for up to 15 percent food use and 10 percent office use. • Parking Requirement for Food Use Over 15 Percent: 1 per 100 SF • Total Existing Parking Spaces in Haven Village: 575 spaces • Required Parking Based on Current Tenants: 587 spaces (12 parking space deficit or 2 percent) • Current Total Food Uses (Restaurants): 19.7 percent Table 2 — Existin Conditions Parking Analysis Summary Existing Conditions Parking Ana;lysis Summary Existing Condkions Required Parking Stalls Existing Conditions Basic Required Parking Stalls Total Existing Haven Village SF 118,2�i4 Required Parking Stalls +1,900 SF Basic Rate 4.50 Total Basic Rate Required Parking Stalls 532 Existing Conditions Required Excess Restaurant Square Footage Park ing Stalls Haven Village Existing Restaurant SF 23,252 Total Existing Haven Village SF 118,264 Haven Village 151k Restaurant SF Limit 17,740 Excess Haven Village 15% Restaurant SF Linn 5,512 Add9 stallsJ'1000 Excess Restaurant SF hate 10.00 Addition Required Restaurant Parking Stalls 55 Required Existing. Conditions Parking Stalls Grand Total 587 Existing Available Haven Village Parking Stalls 575 Existing conditions Haven Village Parking Stalls Difference 12 Deficient Expansion Area Parking Requirement • Current commercial center parking requirement: 5 per 1,000 SF • Size of Expansion Area: 6,484 square feet • Parking Requirement 100 Percent Retail: 32 spaces • New Available Parking in Expansion Area: 38 spaces • Parking Requirement 100 Percent Food Use: 65 spaces • Haven Village Parking Deficit 100 Percent Retail: 6 spaces or 1% • Haven Village Parking Deficit 100 Percent Food Uses: 39 spaces or 6% Table 7 — Proposed Expansion ParKing variance Analysis Sumi Proposed Expansion Parking Variance Analysis Summary Required Haven Village Parking Stalls Existing Conditions Required Parking Stalls 5.57 Proposed Expansion Conditions Required Parking Stalls h5 Haven Village Required Parking Stalls Grand Total with 652 Proposed Expansion Available Haven Village Parking Stalls Existing Conditions .Available Parking Stalls 5 78 Proposed Expansion Conditions Available Parking Staid 58 Haven Village Available Parking Stalls Grand Total! with Proposed Expansion Haven Village Parking Stall Difference 613 39 Deficient 6c 6Deficient I a ry I G n " +tl iuVllllll "" �' J10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Haven Village Parking Count • Parking & Circulation Analysis reviewed available parking at the Haven Village commercial center. • Field counts conducted on Friday February 24, 2017, Saturday, February 25, 2017, and Tuesday February 28, 2017. • Parking utilization counts were taken at 15 minute intervals. • Haven Village parking lot was divided into 5 parking zones. • No parking zone falls below 10 percent available parking spaces with parking for the 6,484 square foot addition. • The highest parking utilization was on Saturday in Zone 1 (in front of Vons market), with a 10 percent parking buffer at 2:00 p.m. and on Saturday in Zone 3 (generally in front of Daiso/Corkys), with a 10 percent parking buffer at 11:00 a.m. 4N NO }� r^ 5�.f Zan f� C Internal C done Zone I`! o ne � ," 16lLeCf?�( � 1rtQernal " � (i1 Ih�E?4^SEC'�1�17 iill��Pf`.ti7n # '; Ls !- Haven Avenue W Haven Village Parking Count (continued) • Second parking count added the 65 stall parking requirement if the 6,484 SF expansion area were occupied by 100 percent food uses to Zones 3, 4 and 5. • Second set of parking utilization tables show that at no time did the available parking in Zones 3, 4 and 5 fall below a 10 percent available parking space buffer. • To reduce potential of reduced parking impacting Zones 3 and 4, only 4,340 SF of food uses permitted in expansion area, which translates into a 4.5 percent deficit in the center. • To reduce parking demand in the more heavily used area in front of the buildings, the center employs a parking attendant who shuttles employees within the center to the back of the buildings (Zone 5). Saturday - Parking Zone 3 ., '; IIIII lllll IIIIIII Innnr>t nlmml11. 11 JIM n 1094 Inllnnr�rr*■�Iwllmnlnllnlnnnnnlnlnn Illllllllllnllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllln Saturday - Parking Zone 4 100% 90% 80% /1r% R 50% 40% i 30% ,0% 10% 0% CPS �° �° y 8°�y° �° y JCP .0 N��p�p s -N" xp s5 no' C. 10. ��. 1ti. ,1. %- .1. .y. b.. b, �. b. 1. 1. %. Tone of Day OverallSaturday - n 0' . f II IIIII I MA IIIIIIII Illllilffl l l l l l l l l l l l l In l'�1�1111111111111111111111111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IiTfil l l l l n l l l l n l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l unnununuuunnnnuunnunnnunnnnn ,. Time of .. u CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Applicant Response to Appeal • CC&Rs are akin to a private contract between two or more parties and apply solely to the contracting parties and not to unrelated third parties. • City is not required to follow or even reference the CC&Rs when considering an application for a Conditional Use Permit or Minor Exception. • Reciprocal parking agreements allow customers to utilize any available spaces within the center so that no one business has to provide all of its parking on its own parcel, thereby benefiting the entire center. • No evidence submitted that the customers patronizing Trader Joe's and Daiso only park within the boundaries of Parcel 2. City Attorney Response to Appeal • The City is not a party to the CC&Rs and has no duty to enforce them. The City cannot be held liable if a property owner breaches a covenant contained in private CC&Rs. • There appears to be substantial evidence to uphold the decision to approve the Minor Exception. The parking study indicates that even with the additional restaurant uses, there will continue to be a parking buffer at Haven Village. • The Conditions of Approval are imposed on the applicant, not the other property owners. It is the applicant's duty to determine how to implement the mitigation. :�;;!. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Response to Appeal • Development Code permits an up to 25 percent reduction in the required parking through the approval of a Minor Exception. • Parking analysis demonstrates that the parking areas closet to expansion area will continued to have a 10 percent parking buffer with the approval of 4,340 square feet of additional food uses and that there adequate stacking for the drive -through lane. • Implementation of the parking attendant has increased utilization of the parking spaces in Zone 5 (rear of center) by employees, increasing available parking in the rest of the center. • Staff has verified that the Conditions of Approval required by the approval of the 6,484 SF expansion area (CUP DRC2008-00464) have been completed. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny the applicant's appeal and uphold the City Planner's decision to approve Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00021 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00022, through the attached Resolutions of approval and Standard Conditions. .��4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pre -Application Review DRC2016-00626 A review of the architecture for a proposed commercial development consisting of two (2) 5- story hotels totaling two hundred sixteen (216) rooms on property located within the Haven Avenue Overlay at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 411 Street. i--atb Street �i1�1 ^fir, vy CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA N N -O U�m3cA . 1 e� �Z w w� ¢a > > N WE PLAN/SITE DATA DR-1.3 =R"VG_+�iMN4P"r ennxaA�As E �MAwolscxauina . .. UFM f• • ' ..:. + aixm Mrs \ J SITE PLAN / SRE DATA DR1.4 �i:c.•:�iii�•r• f14lrMI DIY W N W144;; � LIT, I 1� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - _ JEW �- REAR ELEVATON ❑_ 4 ❑❑---d-d Q d -- - _ ❑ - . FRONT ELEVATION �w HOME ! ! 11 ! ! ! ro !!! ! / 1 ! ! ! ! �� ! ! ! ! rol !!! �,� I 1 ! ! ! ! _ .- _ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e 2, less industry promises SB 649 will allow locals to keep their discretion over "small cell" munities. REALITY: SB 649 only gives complete discretion over small cell installation in coastal zones and historic districts, while the rest of California's communities lose their full ability to: • Negotiate any public benefit such as access for police, fire, or library services. • Require regular maintenance, repair, or replacement of broken small cells. • Reserve pole space for public safety or energy efficiency technology such as police cameras or solar panels. • Negotiate a market rate lease with wireless carriers for installation of their private equipment on public taxpayer funded property. • Generate flexible revenue to pay for services such as police, fire, parks, and pension obligations. • Allow for public input for the location and design of "small cells" even if right outside their homes or in communities attempting to improve their aesthetic character in key residential or business areas. PROMISE: The wireless industry promises SB 649 will help deliver the most advanced "small cell" (5E) technology with "sufficiently minor" impacts on local governments -justifying their push to remove local discretion and community input. REALITY. SB 649's "small cells" aren't so small. Using the least restrictive regulations, SB 649 allows for large, unsightly, and nearly unlimited installations in public spaces (6 cubic feet for antennas and 21 cubic feet for on pole equipment) —all without community input or local approval. Communities will also be burdened and unable to control the amount and size of the following "ancillary" equipment since its excluded from the bill's small cell definition: • Electric meters and any required pedestal. Concealment elements. Any telecommunications demarcation box. • Grounding equipment. • Power transfer switch. Cutoff switch. • Vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services. PROMISE: The wireless industry promises SB 649 will assist in the rapid deployment of 513 technology, create thousands of jobs, and prepare California for the future. REALITY: In reality, SB 649: Cannot promise communities 5G capable technology because the standards for 5G are still being developed and is not readily available for deployment today. Does not require "small cells" to meet any technological standard such as 5G, 4G, or any quality or reliability standards, leaving uncertain exactly what is being "streamlined." Does not require the wireless industry to build out their networks to unserved or underserved communities, instead rewards the industry for existing deployment patterns. Instead of creating jobs, SB 649 actually limits the ability for communities (non -coastal or historic areas), especially those that have been historically marginalized or struggled to attract business, to improve the aesthetics of their neighborhoods and business corridors. Sets a dangerous precedent of limiting the ability for local governments to leverage use of their public property to negotiate a public benefit and generate flexible revenue for essential government services, further eroding local dollars and adding additional pressure to raise taxes or reduce services. Removes local input and any incentive for local governments and the wireless industry to collaborate on the deployment of the most advanced technology, likely resulting in costly litigation throughout the state. SB 231 (Hertzberg) Local Government: Fees and Charges FIRST OBSERVATION: Several in our group were confused by having this EQ item at the TC&PW meeting. The vote was a little confusing with TC&PW not knowing if they should vote or not. SB 231 would add stormwater fees to list of property -related fees that ar not subject to Proposition 218 by adding stormwater to the definition of "sewer" in Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act. Bill Description: Proposition 218, passed by California voters in 1996, adds Art/ices XIII C and XIII D to the California Constitution. Before imposing "property -related fees" on pr perty owners, Article XIII D requires local agencies to either: (1) provide written notice and a 1p tic hearing during which a majority protest of property owners would stop the process or ( hold an election requiring a two-thirds vote. Property related fees or charges for sewer, wate , and trash collection are exempt from these requirements. However, the terms "sewer' and "water' are bill that would add stormwater to the definiti Implementation Act. The proposed definitio5 in Article XIII D. SB 231 is a majority vote of "sewer" in the Proposition 218 Omnibus below: "'Sewer' includes systems, all rea estate, fixtures, and personal property owned, controlled, operated, or manag in connection with or to facilitate sewage collection, treatment, or disposition for s itary or drainage purposes, including lateral and connecting sewers, intercep rs, trunk and outfall lines, sanitary sewage treatment or disposal plants or works, dr ins, conduits, outlets for surface or storm waters, and any and all other works, prop y, or structures necessary or convenient for the collection or disposal of sewage, indu rial waste, or surface or storm waters. 'Sewer system' shall not include a sewer system hat merely collects sewage on the property of a single owner." [Emphasis added.] SB 231 contains legislative inding and declarations explaining that the definition of "sewer" should include stormwa r based previous statutes that existed before passage of Proposition 218 and based on a Cal ornia Supreme Court decision. Among the findings are the notion that "Numerous sources p edating Proposition 218 reject the notion that the term 'sewer' applies only to sanitJses and sanitarysewerage. Observation:rwhelmingly supported this bill, while non -staff, and others did not. It seems if you are stauld have to come up with the stormwater funds for your community, you supported this bill. Why? If SB 231 is enacted, cities would have the ability to levy stormwater fees or charge. Committee voted and approved support for this item. CONTINUANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING At its regular meeting held on June 28, 2017, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission continued the following item(s) to its meeting to be held on July 26, 2017. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION REVOCATION DRC2017-00480—BIANE FAMILY PROPERTIES - A request to revoke Design Review Modification DRC2016-00345, approved in error on November 9, 2016, for a request to revise the conditions of approval for DRC2007-00951 (Planning Commission Resolution No.14-08) for the Biane Winery, a complex comprised of fifteen (15) buildings/structures and three (3) single-family residences located on two (2) parcels with a combined area of 10.41 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District located on the south side of 8th Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues; APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. On January 22, 2014, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for DRC2007-00951. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00481 — BIANE FAMILY PROPERTIES - A request to revise the conditions of approval for DRC2007-00951 (Planning Commission Resolution No.14-08) to allow for the retention of two existing residential structures on site for the Biane Winery, a complex comprised of fifteen (15) buildings/structures and three (3) single-family residences located on two (2) parcels with a combined area of 10.41 acres in the General Industrial (GI) District located on the south side of 8th Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues; APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. Staff has found the proposed project to be within the scope of a project covered by a previously approved Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration approved by the Planning Commission on January 22, 2014. Staff has prepared an addendum prepared per CEQA Section 15164 which does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in that Initial Study. The meeting will be held at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Said continuance was passed by the following vote: Ayes: FLETCHER, MACIAS, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY Noes: NONE Absent: NONE Abstain: NONE Date: June 29, 2017 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Jennifer Palacios, declare as follows I am the Acting Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; that at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on June 28, 2017, said public hearing was opened and continued to the time and place specified in the NOTICE OF CONTINUANCE shown above; and that on June 29, 2017, at the hour of 4:00 p.m., a copy of said notice was posted in a conspicuous place near the door in which said meeting was held. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 29, 2017, at Rancho Cucamonga, California.