Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000/03/08- Workshop Minutes - PC-HPC CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Adjourned Meeting March 8, 2000 Chairman McNiel called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 8:40 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room at Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Rich Macias, John Mannerino, Larry McNiel, Pam Stewart, Peter Tolstoy ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Brad Buller, City Planner; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, Debra Meier, Contract Planner Applicant and representatives present: Matt Jordan, Andy Wright and Ted Hopson, partners of Diversified Pacific Development Group; Pete Pitassi, Architect; Rich Krumweide, Landscape Architect. NEW BUSINESS A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW 00-03 — DIVERSIFIED PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP - Review of conceptual plans for 156 residential dwelling units on 20.15 acres, located at the northeast corner of Milliken Avenue and Base Line Road in the Medium Density(8-14 dwelling units per acre) and Medium-High Density (14-24 dwelling units per acre) residential districts of the Victoria Planned Community. The proposed project density is 7.74 dwelling units per acre (net) - APN: 227-691-01. The workshop was opened by Brad Buller, City Planner, with an introduction of the attendees and a synopsis of the purpose and format of a Pre-Application Review: The project architect, Pete Pitassi, with support from landscape architect Rich Krumweide, provided a general site history. He indicated Tentative Tract 15477, approved in 1994 by Matreyek Homes, remains a valid tentative map; however, the layout of the site, the use of the auto court, and the unit sizes (1,200-1,700 square feet), make it less desirable in today's marketplace. He observed that since 1994 there have been other Pre-Application or Preliminary reviews for various project concepts on this site. He stated that through this process, the present applicants have heard comments and concerns expressed by the Planning Commission pertaining to guest parking, density, building separation, open space, and recreational amenities. He reported that a whole new approach has been taken in the design of this project as a result. Mr. Pitassi explained that the current proposal utilizes two different product types. He said the north half of the site will be comprised of a duplex product built to the Low Medium density standards with building square footage of 2,000-2,500 square feet per unit and the south portion will be developed with an attached (typically six-plex) product built to the Medium density standards with individual units ranging from 1,600-2,000 square feet. He stated the entire project will be a gated community with access from Milliken and Ellena Avenues. He indicated a central recreation area is to be linked by a greenbelt throughout the project with a connection to the future regional trail along the north boundary. He noted guest parking exceeds City standards and approximately 80 percent of the units have sufficient space for parking in front of the individual garages. Mr. Pitassi observed the garage court has been replaced by a pedestrian entry court, with two-car garage access to every unit on the periphery of the building. He pointed out that primary auto access is via the auto access lane. He stated this lane incorporates an innovative concept utilizing a combination of asphalt pavement, turf block, and a concrete strip to form a drive-able surface that is much more aesthetic in nature. He said the concept is derived from an existing project in Irvine that impressed the architect. He also indicated that he met with Tim Fejeran of the Fire Department to discuss appropriate fire access and fire prevention measures such as building sprinklers and the Fire Department is satisfied that proper fire protection can be provided by the 26-foot loop road within the project. Debra Meier, Contract Planner, provided a summary of technical issues related to the project design as well as a clarification of the existing land use designation and the need for an amendment to the Victoria Community Plan in conjunction with the Tentative Tract and Development Review. Commissioner Mannerino felt the design concept looks good and is a unique application to this particular site. Commissioner Stewart expressed support for the proposed density and indicated that the concept was a good proposal for the site. Commissioner Macias also felt it is a good concept and suggested that the applicants proceed with the design of the project. Commissioner Tolstoy indicated he frequently visits attached unit projects and he expressed concem regarding the provision of adequate guest parking. The applicants reiterated their proposal for guest and individual parking and said each unit would have an attached two-car garage. Commissioner Tolstoy expressed support for the use of turf block within the interior lanes. He also suggested that the applicants discuss the density concept with adjoining single-family home owners. Mr. Buller suggested that a neighborhood meeting be held. • Chairman McNiel supported the use of the pedestrian court in place of the auto court. He indicated that the concept was good and encouraged the applicants to move forward with the application. He expressed concem regarding the interface of the driving lane and the pseudo-sidewalk and felt it could result in conflicts between pedestrians who may mistakenly feel safe in this "sidewalk' zone. He also indicated that the long-term maintenance of the turf-block would need to be considered, perhaps even in project conditioning at the time of approval. Mr. Pitassi acknowledged that proper maintenance would be a must to avoid drainage-related problems because of the setting of the turf-block adjacent to the paved surfaces. PUBLIC COMMENTS Sharon Ferrara, 11661 Bad Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, expressed a desire to be kept informed of the progress. Edith Becker, 11597 Bari Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, indicated she also would like to be kept informed. t PC Adjourned Minutes -2- March 8, 2000 ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, i Ter:- -„_i�/ Bra Se 'e ary PC Adjourned Minutes -3- March 8, 2000