Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-114 - Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 18-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 17-113, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS: 1. On April 18, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees. 2. On December 6, 2017, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 17-113, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. 3. The Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued need for described capital improvements and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate. 4. The San Bernardino County Transportation Governments (SBCTA) requires that project costs and fees, including Transportation Development Fees (DIF), be updated biennially. 5. Fees established by Resolution No. 17-113 were based on the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Price Index for Construction Items, from 2nd Quarter 2016 to 2nd Quarter 2017 which was calculated at 15.2% but a 13% increase was approved in the resolution. 6. The fee increase is based on the remaining 2.2% increase from 2nd Quarter 2016 to 2nd Quarter 2017 resulting in an overall effective increase of 2.4%. All summaries and calculations are hereby incorporated. 7. On November 21, 2018, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing. 8. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES; 1. The facis set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds as follows: Resolution No. 18-114— Page 1 of 13 a. The purpose of the fee revision is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and b. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit"A", attached hereto; and C. The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and d. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and e. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit"B", and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and f. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. 3. DEFINITIONS: a. "Development projects"shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development project" includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. b. "Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. C. "Equivalent dwelling unit"or"EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing is equal to one EDU. 4. PAYMENT OF FEE: The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid per Chapter 3.28 City-Wide System Fee for Transportation Development subsection 3.28.020 Fees Established of the RCMC. The City Engineer, or their designee, shall calculate and determine the amount of the fee based upon the rate then in effect at the time of payment. 5. FEE SCHEDULE: The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $10,854 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C". 6. EDU/LAND USE EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE: The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: Resolution No. 18-114— Page 2 of 13 Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing/Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office/ Business Park- Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self-Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.OEDU 7. USE OF FEE: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". 8. ADMINISTRATION FEE: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 9. FEE REVIEW:The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts for the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 10. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees as herein adopted, described, and amended shall not be collected by the City until March 1, 2018. 11. JUDICIAL CHALLENGE: Any judicial action proceeding to appeal, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. 12. CERTIFICATION: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 18-114— Page 3 of 13 St I PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21 day of November, 2018. L. Dennis Michael, ayor ATTEST: nice C. Reynolds, CI rk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 21 St day of November 2018. AYES: Alexander, Kennedy, Michael, Spagnolo, Williams NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None Executed this 21' day of November, 2018, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ice C. Reynolds, Clerk Resolution No. 18--i 14— PGge 4 of 13 EXHIBIT "A" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM PROJECTS & PROJECT COSTS re °dray lnterc ► ngs.. y� \� 41l F1 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway -Widen NB & SB On-Ramps $401,442 F2 Foothill Boulevard at 1-15 Freeway -Widen NB & SB On-Ramps $1,304,685 F3 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $24,204,565 F4 Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway- Interchange $48,527,200 F5 Grove Avenue/4th Street at 1-10 Freeway- Interchange Improvements $5,313,197 Total: $79,751,089 Ralroatl �,ade � ar��`�ons and ross�ng��,;f :` R1 Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $12,798,901 R2 6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $1,039,025 R3 6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $1,039,025 R4 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $1,039,025 Total: $15,915,977 Brig Protect Estimate 131 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $2,420,456 B2 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel -Widen Existing Bridge $1,147,651 B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch -Widen Existing Bridge $1,126,398 B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,282,252 B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel -Widen Existing Bridge $7,323,947 B6 Whittram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $1,412,130 B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $1,453,455 B8 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $2,447,613 Total: $18,613,901 Resolution No. 18-114— Page 5 of 13 W MR S1 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $786,353 S2 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,590,417 S3 Arrow Route - 500' E/O 1-15 Freeway to 1,300' E/O 1-15 Freeway - $1,320,034 Widen South Side S4 Banyan Street - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue -Widen North Side $1,165,361 S5 Banyan Street - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $9,609,802 Alignment S6 Base Line Road- Etiwanda Avenue to 1-15 Freeway-Widen North Side $1,160,638 2 to 3 Lanes S7 Cherry Avenue -Wilson Avenue to 1-15 Freeway -Widen West Side $1,406,226 S8 Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 $1,506,587 Lanes S9 East Avenue - 1-15 to Victoria Street - Various Bottlenecks $963,460 S10 East Avenue - Fire Station to Wilson - New $1,529,020 S11 East Avenue - Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way- New $517,151 S12 Etiwanda Avenue - 6th Street to Arrow Route -Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $4,870,431 S13 Etiwanda Avenue - Miller Avenue to 850' N/O Miller Avenue - Widen $332,960 East Side S14 Etiwanda Avenue - Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue - Curb and Gutter $1,096,880 East Side Only S15 Etiwanda Avenue - Existing Northern Terminus to North Rim Way - $619,873 New S16 Foothill Boulevard - Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Widen 4 to $1,421,575 6 Lanes S17 Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue to 700' E/O Hellman Avenue - $2,278,771 Widen North Side Only S18 Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue - Widen Intersection $8,554,247 S19 Foothill Boulevard - Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue - Widen 4 $2,313,012 to 6 Lanes S20 Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Tapia Via -Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side $1,268,083 Only S21 Grove Avenue - San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard - Widen 1 $780,450 to 2 Lanes East Side Only S22 Haven Avenue - Base Line Road to 1-210 Freeway - Widen West Side Only $14,567,606 S23 Lower Crest Road- Day Creek Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue- New $1,896,221 S24 Miller Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue -Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $2,864,404 Resolution No. 18-114— Page 6 of 13 S25 Onliken Avenue - 5th Street to 700' S/O 5th Street -Widen West Side $360,117 S26 Victoria Street - East Property Line of Etiwanda High School to 1-15 $347,129 Freeway - Improve Both Shoulders S27 VinDrive - Etiwanda Avenue to 1,300' W/O Etiwanda Avenue - $1,015,411 S28 Wilson Avenue - Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard - New $8,057,168 S29 Wilson Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Backbone Only $667,101 S30 Wilson Avenue - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $7,084,263 S31 Youngs Canyon - Cherry Avenue to Wardman Bullock - New $11,098,678 Total $93,049,431 Project T1 4th Street at Richmond Place $413,249 T2 4th Street at Utica Avenue $413,249 T3 6th Street at Buffalo Avenue $413,249 T4 6th Street at Cleveland Avenue $413,249 T5 6th Street at Etiwanda Avenue $413,249 T6 6th Street at Hellman Avenue $413,249 T7 6th Street at Pittsburgh Avenue $413,249 T8 6th Street at Rochester Avenue $413,249 T9 6th Street at Santa Anita Avenue $413,249 T10 6th Street at Utica Avenue $413,249 T11 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street $413,249 T12 Archibald Avenue at San Bernardino Road $413,249 T13 Archibald Avenue at Victoria Street $413,249 T14 Archibald Avenue at Wilson Avenue $413,249 T15 Arrow Route at Center Avenue $413,249 T16 Banyan Street at Rochester Avenue $413,249 T17 Banyan Street at Wardman Bullock Road $413,249 T18 Base Line Road at San Carmela Court $413,249 T19 Base Line Road at Shelby Place $413,249 T20 Carnelian Street at Banyan Street $413,249 T21 Carnelian Street at Wilson Avenue $413,249 T22 Cherry Avenue at Youngs Canyon Road $413,249 Resolution No. 18-114— Page 7 of 13 T23 Church Street at Elm Avenue (West) $413,249 T24 Church Street at Mayten Avenue $413,249 T25 Church Street at Ramona Avenue $413,249 T26 Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway $413,249 T27 Civic Center Drive at Red Oak Street $413,249 T28 Ridgeline Place at Wilson Avenue $413,249 T29 Day Creek Boulevard at Madrigal Place $413,249 T30 Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue $413,249 T31 East Avenue at Miller Avenue $413,249 T32 East Avenue at Highland Avenue $413,249 T33 Etiwanda Avenue at Garcia Drive $413,249 T34 Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue $413,249 T35 Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Court $413,249 T36 Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue $413,249 T37 Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue $413,249 T38 Haven Avenue at Trademark Street $413,249 T39 Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue $413,249 T40 Haven Avenue at Wilson Avenue $413,249 T41 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street $413,249 T42 Hermosa Avenue at Church Street $413,249 T43 Milliken Avenue at 5th Street $413,249 T44 Milliken Avenue at Wilson Avenue $413,249 T45 Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard $413,249 T46 Spruce Avenue at Elm Avenue $413,249 T47 Spruce Avenue at Mountain View Drive $413,249 T48 Spruce Avenue at Red Oak Street $413,249 T49 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue $413,249 T50 Terra Vista Parkway at Town Center Drive $413,249 T51 Town Center Drive at Elm Avenue $413,249 T52 Wilson Avenue at East Avenue $413,249 T53 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue $413,249 T54 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue (West) $413,249 T55 Wilson Avenue at San Sevaine Road $413,249 T56 Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road $413,249 T57 Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue $413,249 T58 4th Street at Golden Lock Road - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade 1-)29,518 Resoluiion No. 18-114- Page 8 of 13 T59 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street- Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T60 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $59,036 T61 Arrow Route at Red Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T62 Arrow Route at White Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T63 Banyan Street at East Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T64 Base Line Road at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T65 Base Line Road at Spruce Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T66 Base Line Road at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T67 Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street- Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T68 Day Creek Boulevard at Sugar Gum Street - Left Turn Phasing $29,518 Upgrade T69 Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing $29,518 Upgrade T70 Milliken Avenue at Millennium Court - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T71 Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T72 Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T73 Milliken Avenue at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 T74 Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $29,518 Total: $24,086,494 Signal In#er�onnect System Project Estimate SH Signal Interconnect System $9,091,471 Total: $9,091,471 Programs Totals Category Estimate;; Freeway Interchanges $79,751,089 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings $15,915,977 Bridges $18,613,901 Streets $93,049,431 Traffic Signals $24,086,494 Signal Interconnect System $9,091,471 Total: $240,508,361 Resolution No. 18-114— Page 9 of 13 rM//} ri. AP 140 r�rr%// / ���0/� r'��/% /� _ `��✓/rrp�/ r/rr %ar- A�� %%/i ,�l /i%ii% �o% /r////ar' rir�%yo ,,,,r Program Total $240,508,361 Less Fund Balance as of 2005 -$20,000,000 Sub-Total $220,508,361 Administration Fee (15%) $33,076,254 Total: $253,584,615 Resolution leo. 18-,114 — Page 10 of 13 EXHIBIT "B" TRANSPORTATION EVELOPMENT FEES AL Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $10,854 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/Accessory Dwelling Unit $6,512 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit $6,512 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom $2,171 Nursing/Congregate Care - Per Bed $2,171 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $16,281 Office/ Business Park- Per 1,000 Square Feet $13,025 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $6,512 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet $5,427 Hotel/ Motel - Per Room $8,683. Day Care - Per Student $2,714 Self-Storage - Per Unit $217 Service Station - Per Pump $54,270 Resolution No. 18-114— Page 11 of 13 EXHIBIT "C" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM CALCULATIONS Vacant Residential Property = 950 acres Single Family Dwelling Units (SFDU) = 5,363 units Multi-Family Dwelling Units (MFDU) = 5,248 units Vacant Industrial Property = 719 acres = 31,319,640 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5 then the future square footage of industrial development is 31,319,640 square feet x 0.5 = 15,659,820 square feet. Vacant Commercial Property = 334 acres = 14,549,040 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future square footage of commercial development is 14,549,040 square feet x 0.25 = 3,637,260 square feet. Egurvalentwel/mg,Umts(E©U)per Lantl Ilse Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to be tabulated for each type of land use, the "Equivalent Dwelling Units" or EDU for each type of land use must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type's EDU is based on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Per City Resolution No. 91-092, the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/Accessory Dwelling Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing/Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office/ Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self-Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU Resolution No. -i 8-114— Page 12 of 13 FMA,`rrequi�raler►t Dllir `%Unfits anc lee / ant Lend sof o/ // tyre "'IV 0/ / ILS/ d .7 i -D /� .. _..,. ,r�' 111 ., Single-Family 5,363 Units 1.00 5,363 Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Dwelling 5,248 Units 0.60 3,149 Unit Industrial Park (per 15,659,820 Square 0.60 9,396 1,000 SF) Feet Commercial (per 3,637,260 Square 1.50 5,455 1,000 SF) Feet Total Future EDU 23,363 Gec/este '�s#f � E+ �Xten Dellirrg/ r�# E� / ' / / foo Total Cost of Projects $219,199,343 Total Future EDU as of February 2005 23,363 Cost per EDU $9,382 Calculate Transportation DeVo*ment Fe�nd Use CDU by/ 77 ltPIP/ Fees Land Use Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU $10,854 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/Accessory Dwelling Unit 0.6 EDU $6,512 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU $6,512 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU $2,171 Nursing/Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU $2,171 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU $16,281 Office/ Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU $13,025 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU $6,512 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU $5,427 Hotel/ Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU $8,683 Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU $2,714 Self-Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU $217 Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU $54,270 Resolution No. 18-114— Page 13 of 13