Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-01-22-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC O THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF ;CHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION JANUARY 22, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER O Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell _ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca_ II: PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION G A. ORAL PRESENTATION AND ANNOLICEMENT FOR THE 1007"ANNIVERSARY OF THE HISTORIC ETIWANDA DEPOT `.J HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA N HU JANUARY 22, 2014 Cuc�ONCM Page 2 ::: IV. CONSENT CALEND. R/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION �i B. Approval of regular meeting minutes dated December 11, 2013 C. Approval of workshop minutes dated December 11, 2013 V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and(orposted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. D. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00775 - JAMES SCARFUTO - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,805 square foot single-family residence with an attached 762 square foot garage on a 23,958 square foot lot located on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue in the Very Low(VL) Residential Development District at 9250 loamosa Court; APN: 1061-611-16. Related Case: Variance DRC2013-00777. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single-family residence in a residentially zoned district. D E. VARIANCE DRC2013-00777 JAMES SCARFUTO-A request to reduce the required 60 foot rear yard setback to feet for a single-family residence located on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue in the Very Low(VL)Residential Development District at 9250 loamosa Court; APN: 1061-611-16. Related Case: Minor Design Review DRC2013-00775. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, which covers minor alterations in land use requirements including building setbacks. F. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397 - STEVE SAGE - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,041 square foot single-family residence with a 1,009 square foot attached garage on a 20,624 square foot lot located on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue in the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District at 9260 loamosa Court;APN: 1061-611-17.The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single-family residence in a residentially zoned district. OHISTORIC PRESERVATION ATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA AP,MCHO JANUARY 22, 2014 MAMMA Page 3 G. VARIANCE DRC2013-00388-STEVE SAGE-A request to reduce the required 60 foot rear yard setback to 30 feet for a proposed single-family residence(DRC2013-00397)located on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue in the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District at 9260 loamosa Court;APN: 1061-611-17. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single- family residence in a residentially zoned district. H. DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00909- NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL: A proposal to demolish an existing veterinarian office and construct a new veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of 25,705 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District located at the northeast comer of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue at 7289 Amethyst Avenue; the proposal includes incorporating an existing residence to the north of the site at 7271 Amethyst Avenue as part O of the project; APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related file: Pre-Application Review DRC2007-00733, Minor Exception DRC2009-00360,and Uniform Sign Program DRC2009- 00697. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302- Replacement or Reconstruction. I. MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2009-00360-NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL: A request for a 25 percent reduction in the required parking for a proposed new veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of about 23,000 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue at 7289 Amethyst Avenue;the proposal includes incorporating an existing residence to the north of the site at 7271 Amethyst Avenue as part of the project; APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, and-20. Related file: Pre-Application Review DRC2007-00733, Development Review DRC2008-00909, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction. J. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2009-00697 - NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL: A proposed Uniform Sign Program for Development Review DRC2008-00909, a proposed veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of about 23,000 square feet in the General Commercial(GC) District located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue at 7289 Amethyst Avenue; the proposal includes incorporating an existing residence to the north of the site at 7271 Amethyst Avenue as part of the project; APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related file: Pre-Application Review DRC2007-00733, Development Review DRC2008-00909, and Minor O Exception DRC2009-00360. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction. K. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 - BIANE BUSINESS PARK-A request to modify the Biane Winery, a complex comprised of PHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA JANUARY 22, 2014 Page 4 fifteen (15) buildings/structures and three (3) single-family residences located on two (2) parcels with a combined area of 10.41 acres by demolishing the existing Bottling Plant/Warehouse and Dry Wine Bottling Room and constructing an industrial warehouse building of 122,304 square foot within the General Industrial (GI) District, located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues-APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00475 L. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00475 - BIANE BUSINESS PARK - A request to remove 24 trees related to Development Review DRC2007-00951 for a 6.51 gross acres site within the General Industrial Development District, located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues-APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. VI,: COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND. PLANNING COMMISSION VII. ADJOURNMENT . 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 16,2014,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain i O HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C�oNcn JANUARY 22, 2014 Page 5 from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speakers podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. OAVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. O Y VicinityMap Historic Preservation and . Planning Commission Meeting JANUARY 22 , 2014 ^.._.._�r..r..�..���..' r_1 r._•.�.._..�' i � I r..J :9t .�..w. •ss�.�._o • I i � E o a 0 C � z I V1 V e llC 0 191�i St Line gL L Base B Base Line ' d h rch Church Foothill e Foothill N $ � i Arrcw o ® C Arnow J rsey C 8th Si i o � o m C 6th W L9 6th t Q = g D, E 4th I 4th * Meeting Location: City HalliCouncil F G H, I, J K L 1 00 Civic Center Drh Item A: Oral Presentation/Historic Etiwanda Depot Items B & C: Approval of Regular and Workshop Minutes 12/11/13 1N • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF CWmHO UCAA�oNOA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 2013 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California CALL TO ORDER- Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager, Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary Associate Planner, Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner PUBLIC COMMtTNICATIONS, :. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None • Item A-1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 11, 2013 Page 2 III.. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of minutes dated November 13, 2013 Moved by Munoz, seconded by limberly, adopted 5-0 I P[1BLIC HEARINGS G COMMISSION:.'. .: The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per Individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2013-00885 - CAMERON PELADO - A request to operate a 9,100 square foot full-service restaurant and bar serving distilled spirits for a site located within the Foothill Marketplace commercial center on the south side of Foothill Boulevard and east of the 1-15 Freeway within the Regionally Related Office/Commercial (RRO/C)Development District,located at 12809-B Foothill Boulevard-APN: 0229-031-33. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. C. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT DRC2013-00886-CAMERON PELADO-A request to provide live entertainment in conjunction with a 9,100 square foot full-service restaurant and bar serving distilled spirits (CUP DRC2013-00885) for a site located within the Foothill Marketplace commercial center on the south side of Foothill Boulevard and east of the 1-15 Freeway within the Regionally Related Office/Commercial(RRO/C)Development District, located at 12809-B Foothill Boulevard -APN: 0229-031-33. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 - Existing Facilities. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation(copy on rile). Alfred Campano stated he is the Operations Manager for the new business and his entire team was present and available for questions.. Commissioner Munoz commented on the good report and thanked staff for adding conditions regarding their operations and the requirement to return to the Commission in 6 months. He said he looks forward to trying it out and he hoped it would enhance the area. Item A-2 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 11, 2013 Page 3 Commissioner Wimberly concurred, and said it should be a good location for them and that he is thinking positively with respect to their operations and said he is hopeful of a more positive outcome than what was experienced with the prior business. Commissioner Oaxaca said he appreciated the owners seeing opportunity in Rancho Cucamonga. He noted the benefits of adding employees, an experienced management team, and the detailed business plan for success. He said the Conditional Use Permit will come back to the Commission for review and should help them be successful. He said he looks forward to their opening. Vice Chairman Fletcher said everything presented seems favorable. He said it was an interesting business plan and menu and the Decor looks upscale. Chairman Howdyshell concurred. She said it is a positive when a business wants to hire and invest in our city. She said the staff report was detailed along with good documentation, business forecast and an interesting menu. She said it should be successful. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, • closed the public hearing. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, adopted 5-0 Resolution 13-54 for Conditional Use Permit DRC2013-00885. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly, adopted 5-0 Resolution 13-55 for Entertainment Permit DRC2013-00886. V. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Vice Chairman Fletcher thanked staff for the holiday party and noted that it was very enjoyable. VI. ADJOURNMENT THE PLANNING COMMISSION ADJOURNED TO A WORKSHOP REGARDING A RECAP OF THE DESIGN AND SIGN TOUR(DRC2013-01029)AT 7.•17 PM. THE WORKSHOP WAS HELD IN THE RAINS ROOM AND THOSE MINUTES WILL APPEAR SEPARA TEL Y. • Item A-3 r )Q HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES DECEMBER 11, 2013 Page 4 If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours,Monday through Thursday,7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m.,except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Cleric's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission.(Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. Item A-4 i • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP OF CR4mHO oNGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 11, 2013 - 7:00 PM MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center RAINS ROOM 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Cjj!j&I:To ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance TIME 7.•40 PM Roil Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz X Wimberly X Oaxaca X II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS';. ; This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Item B-1 i HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION i-% � WORKSHOP MINUTES DECEMBER 11, 2013 Page 2 A. RECAP OF DESIGN AND SIGN TOUR(DRC2013-01029) Mike Smith, Associate Planner, began with the PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) briefly reviewed the top areas considered for higher density/mixed use development. Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner, continued with the Compass Blueprint and TOD portion of the presentation. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, recapped the Design and Sign Tour of Santa Clarita, Pasadena and Monrovia. There was a general discussion regarding the City's projected maximum population count and how that comes into play with how the mixed use areas were calculated in addition to how many rooftops that can be properly supported with our infrastructure. Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager, Economic and Community Development said it is possible to introduce high density without eroding the stability of existing lower density. He said 86%of our population commutes out of the city to work;we need to study how to reverse that so we are a source of employment-we would like people to view Rancho as their place of employment. It was mentioned that the Gold Line still being looked at as an opportunity and that there is still a perception of trains still being noisy. Mike Lutz with Marc Homes said with respect to trains and TOD locations;large TODs can help to shield existing residential structures;they create sound walls for the existing housing stock in the area. Ms. Burnett noted that BRTs only need 1-5 acres of land but they must be close and walkable to the stops for them to be successful. Mr. Bloom said we are looking at the concept of districting the city because of the need to create proximity to other uses, transportation,services and cultural destinations. We need to think about how and where to create those districts and to also consider different design character. Commissioner Munoz noted that Pasadena is a good example; all the developments they visited on the tour were in proximity to each other but all were unique and different. Vice Chairman Fletcher said that from a transportation perspective, Rancho is unique because it is bordered on 3 sides by freeways. He said he would like to see data about Item B-2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES DECEMBER 11, 2013 Page 3 persons living in a TOD and if they are using the transportation to work elsewhere. With respect to the timing of developing the BRT, Commissioner Munoz noted that the BRT would be a solution that could be put in real time because they do not take so long to construct or outfit with the appropriate infrastructure. There was a general discussion regarding the pros and cons of Mixed Use and TODs (refer to the PowerPoint presentation). Commissioner Oaxaca noted that if we are able to create local circulator transit, it may help address parking questions. if it is combined with the Omnitrans service it can relieve the need for individual car ownership. Mr. Bloom said our generation is the one of having multiple vehicles- we are changing our demographics to reverse that trend. Vice Chairman Fletcher said we are approaching buildout. He said we need to change • so we can create jobs and that will lessen the need for freeways - he suggested a balance and variety of development. He said he is glad to see less square footage in homes and smaller lots because it makes it possible for more people to live here. Mr. Lutz said we should look at the character of what the City will be 25 years from now and how we can impact that with what we do today. Chairman Howdyshell said that we need to bring in a strong work base and we want to make it possible for people to live here and not have to commute. Ms. Burnett noted that this issue is part of our Economic Development Strategic Plan and includes zoning and planning. Commissioner Munoz noted that with higher densities, it is easier to mix differing styles of development and make them work together. He asked what we can do with older commercial properties; do we ask for a total remodel or just paint? Donald Granger said property managers are embracing bolder color schemes. He said staff is looking at the options to provide flexibility in response to marketplace conditions while preserving the quality of the built environment. Finally, he noted that another current trend is that property managers are requesting landscape modifications in order to reduce water usage. Mr. Lutz said with respect to the aging centers that the character of the City is changing with urbanization. He said Rancho does not really have a downtown/center but could have 20 years from now. He said the surface parking lots could be changed to Item B-3 s HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES DECEMBER 11, 2013 Page 4 subterranean lots, encouraging the walkable nature of the area. He said mixed use residential communities can have a downtown feel. Mr. Bloom suggested the Commissioners give direction to staff about the Commissioners'comfort levels with embracing more differing design and color schemes. He said the discussions about mixed use will be more difficult. Ms. Burnett noted that this workshop was intended to wrap up the tour and get an idea of the Commission's vision and then lead us to the next step. She said staff will start looking at the economic strategy, 'and the blending of uses and then see what mechanism gets us to that place. I ADJOURNMENT:' 9:15 PAA E ou need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, ase contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 urs prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to sure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. Item B-4 I HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION oacm WORKSHOP MINUTES MU DECEMBER 11, 2013 Page 5 If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours,Monday through Thursday,7:00 a.m.to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office • and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please tum off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us Item B-5 • ORAL UPDATE AND PRESENTATION ON THE HISTORIC ETIWANDA DEPOT CLEAN UP AND 100TH ANNIVERSARY CELEBRATION Item C c STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPA>ErI1V>Wr DATE: January 22, 2014 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission RANCHO FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager C;UCAMONGA BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00775 - JAMES SCARFUTO - Site Plan and architectural review of a 4,805 square foot single-family residence with an attached 762 square foot garage on a 23,958 square foot lot on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District, located at 9250 loamosa Court - APN: 1061-611-16. Related file: Variance DRC2013-00777. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single-family residence in a residentially zoned district. 9 0 VARIANCE DRC2013-00777 - JAMES SCARFUTO - A request to reduce the required 60-foot rear yard setback toX feet for a single-family residence on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District, located at 9250 loamosa Court -APN: 1061-611-16. Related file: Minor Design Review DRC2013-00775. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, which covers minor alterations in land use requirements including building setbacks. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Minor Design Review DRC2013-00775 and Variance DRC2013-00777 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Prosect Density: 2.11 dwelling units per acre North - Vacant Land; San Bernardino Flood Control District, Very Low Residential (.1- 2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residences; Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Lot; Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-Family Residence; Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential • Item D&E1 i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00775 AND DRC2013-00777 - SCARFUTO RESIDENCE January 22, 2014 Page 2 ANALYSIS:. A. Proiect Proposal: The applicant is requesting site plan and design review of a one-story, 4,805 square foot single-family residence with a 762 square foot attached three-car garage. The project is within the Equestrian Overlay District and there is a 15-foot wide trail along the north and west property lines of the site. The project complies with all the development criteria except for the 60 foot rear yard setback. The applicant has submitted a request for a Variance to reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 60 feet to 40 feet. The original subdivision (SUBTT16461) included a Variance (DRC2003-00902) permitting a reduction in the required lot depth. The odd-shaped lot is approximately 120 feet deep along the east property line, 122 feet deep along the southwest property line, and 170 feet deep from the front to rear property lines, as measured down the center of the lot. The shape of the lot makes it difficult to layout the residence without a reduction in the 60-foot rear yard setback requirement. B. Variance: The applicant is requesting a Variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 60 feet to 40 feet. Staff feels that it is reasonable to permit a reduction in the rear yard setback because of the lot originally being approved with a reduced lot depth. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: 1. Finding/Fact: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Without the reduction in the required lot depth, the applicant would be required to significantly redesign the proposed residence to adhere to the required rear yard setback. 2. Finding/Fact: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not. apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The subdivision of which the subject lot is a part included a Variance reducing the lot depth significantly below the 200-foot lot depth requirement. 3. Finding/Fact: Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Without the Variance, the applicant would have to design a house that is much more shallow than other houses in the same development district. 4. Finding/Fact: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. It is common practice to grant reductions in the rear yard setback when the project site is substantially deficient in meeting the minimum required lot depth. 5. Finding/Fact: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Variance will only minimally affect the outward appearance and will not intensify the use of the project site. C. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Fletcher, and Granger) on December 17, 2013. The Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. Item D&E2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2013-00775 AND DRC2013-00777 - SCARFUTO RESIDENCE January 22, 2014 • Page 3 D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as both a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the construction of a limited number of structure including a single-family residence, and as Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15105, which covers minor alterations in land use requirements including building setbacks. The project entails permitting the construction of a single-family-residence on a legal residential lot and a reduction in the required rear yard setback because of a lot depth deficiency. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, in that the proposal does not propose modifying or expanding the existing structure. The Planning Manager has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern with respect to the application requests. Respectfully submitted, • Candyce rnett Planning Manager CB:TV/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Design Review Committee Action Agenda for December 17, 2013 Resolution of Approval for Minor Design Review DRC2013-00775 Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2013-00777 • Item D&E3 0 • • . x ro rVarc sxr.wauarc airAwxG Aa0 rAIaS soar rAaB IMUS �r,smrs sxAu Bi aErplAnxi VACANT (FLOOD CONTROL) NEW 6 FT HT � -r,rE.sura•-SrcwF m snrtto v AB-nax.1M°rAMS r°u IED BLOCK WALL lnria laal,arr r,MSJ 4rAM Br RD Br uSMC,PiaarMeAR m,or,W " '--. �3� ALL WALLS TAN IN COLOR r+0i9BLE C'aNStAr,Ct1nG A 9rQr rAr� EXISTING 15 FT _ EASEMENT - _..-_-` - P . EXIST 2 FT SWALE m EXISTING 15 FT U EASEMENT NEW 6 BLOCK FT HT I xals cams QJ`'-orq RESIDENCE FOR ,l SCARFUTO Z I 24'a4' 779 IRON BARK LN. RD J ALL WALLS IAN IN COLOR sa SAN DIMAS CA.91773 a I PH 909-394-5576 @ .. ..• ' � NEW 6 FT HT __...__ BLOCK WALL ®> :' (n --- ALL WADS TAN IN COLOR UD Q 6 FT WIDE SOLD METAL CA7E ®O LOT SIZE 23,958 Sr N FOOTPRINT 5989 SO FT ::33 m 1 I L� HOUSE 4805 SO FI a]]]Z rµnor m,r¢ u VACANT (FLOOD CONTROL) �: ocroan.r ( GARAGE 762 SO FI a - saXrnrrl PATIO ROOF 422 SO FTau O 25 11 LOT COVERAGE R; IMPERVIOUS AREA 9871 SO FT O N u rrr¢•ua - ---'-T -_ i HARDSCAPE(W/O ROOF) 3882 SF _ N a 11) 00 P, .t 0rrA�wro Do RE310 N A"° LIVNG AREA 3081 SO FT g 3O VACANT s41 Z INDEX Rp __ 1 51 TE PLAN 1.1 DRAINAGE PLAN m 2 FLOOR PLAN 2.1 FLOOR AREAS 3 ROOF PLAN I' BSEP ITC 4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS tpf _.I I '� r[P,s.Wti. 5 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS � £ i LANDSCAPE PLANS b �'�•rad PIIS rsa t .wrurlr aelKa.r _ 14--E EXPANSION f (STING 15 FF PITS - O EASEMENT - Q i : rua •,.-• Imo! I _ _ - a'-�•nw ar ma 1 i ~ w,srtr a e 11 n.:x1.r."TE 22 p a FI xt.slnrw r.r. HILLSIDE N89P� . .� SIZE `.w._._� ..I- r�,3r '� Ac.wr. .rc Pn1 i IOAMOSA 4 rr xr aI.E 4 rr nt.,rws'»» .; IOAfAOSA CT. ............... w In sem•r.w u.ru¢ i WILSON w�vrsa°w r+vA au _ �� .roe rss .wr e,ss w sora w G a vwrt Torr - O_ u 210 FREE WAV 0710 VACANT 0 rn VICINITY MAP SITE PLAN SCALE 1 INCH 10 FF —f MCI wa}I 0 8 i g I N08- 32'20„w 765.85 FT AO Z C (O N '•/ _ I 'r- _---- D �o O r A —moi I ,'' D G7 a � •i i'. ''' I i� (v' 00 CO a rk v T. _ _..- _t: 1,Y................... _---- ----------- - 11915 FT PL 2 s �iiN3?Aon C' r aflat r Will �ea��� RRRR= 8 � � rY€@B g1 F � � ¢ tg f }12 DRAINAGE PLAN ;,® PETE V®L®E®A A-kgti @ Plm:mg RESIDENCE FOR JIM AND JAN SCARFUTO . 180 N BENSON AVE. D, UPLAND.CA. 91786 9250 IOMOSA CT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA TEL 909 3731150 931M W941 1T T - lT ............ 15' r' ............ ................ ---—-----—------- q CA . I • G 5 5 is IQ Da • cIII "L.� .3 APPI041) FELE VOLBEOP AnkggLwpo P ma hnnng N) RESIDENCE FOR JIM AND JAN SCARFUTO aE 180 N BENSON AVE SUITE D.UPLAND,CA 91786 9250 IOAMOSA.RANCHO CUCAMOUCA il 50 FAX 909 37J 952 83'84 wall r----------------- nc r--------------- I I I I II' I —A —— r—————-———————— __ --————— ——— � I le I I ~ I i I I I yl I I I I I I I I I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----------- I I I I cu.on N+o, I Q I n I I e I i I =m- ZI p-nrS nZ 0 Onn mNF� 1 NY[r I O�yy11 �m I oOQ I I O Y�D O n I mot I r $� D =ma �9 I i Z I'�mN I I I � $ I vuo � _J 8a � o eo 8 R WWF cm?=, .<µo PETE VOLBEDR PP@bid@§Lwg PI®NFUNg dwp;wx- owl LA RESIDENCE FOR,AM AND JAN SCARFUTO ayso. ah 180 N BENSON AVE SUITE D.UPLAND,CA 91786 9250 IOAMOSA,RANCHO CUCAMONGA TEL 909 373 1150 FAx 909 373 052 mn amortrt nt � O• oox®a•w Q � U oaa,ruo.nw [�7� --� CL a o LLJ 03 P,OSW SNCtO � ~ 4 N UA =13 .. 1 wWr n[rG OMxM ® 0 .M. O ` ® Z U m P aa Z REAR ELEVATION w ,COE Ltl"IOI•IR•OM a r+ m Q a' R m �o .Paa®„wrt r n POI a,o.m 61001 sww n 1�dw ` Ny�Vt;,�,,S ��.�'� �� • �r..1r n ao arum ..xa,m.rw.4Y , 1VyI,:ti,y yy,,;;�,,��Si•� � �PIp01 SwRN _ O / sxrtw � • �® � , ® ® � ® ® ® J r.w n PP rwaw �, Z O �y K y M1a X1040 0 � wrtr.wn, s o swim a FRONT ELEVATION 4 6 OLT90 wall it � • Ell I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' o ©' I I II p y ' I l if I I I I � I •. I I m I I rrl I I I a I I z ] I II r I D p I I I rrl I < I D I � I > I I I I I O I Z Ip 1 11 I S C 9 I � I o m N I I 5 0 I • I • rrrl I I I D I I� 0 I I❑ Z `- = O DO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III > I III Oe9fr a I • OM,= WKM h r I I PETE V®L®E©A Apvblt@gL jpo PI®Awpg XT I (J7RE90ENCE FOR aM AND JAN SCARFUTO 180 N BENSON AVE SUITE D.UPLAND.CA 91786 9250 i0AM05A,RANCHO CUCAMONCA TEL 909 373 1150 FAX 909 373 952 { e. s MUNA'..m 710 ————————————— 1lJ (7)BLOCK WALL 1 Owner/Architect o HORSE CORRAL E V-QTE51 OfIIR L KAR,1110 T $1'IjI" I 9750 NN05A V. 1 OANOW CLICANRIOA CA 9 SOIL ARCHITECT: PC I[°a14uA MIL MAY !1 / le0 IS BENSON-L IInNNO,G 9NNIS AAERfR .\ 909-]7}1150 1..x.]A uofurt ml.�_M xM1O 9 1>p—.G OI/GF �oaA•��O Ovmn u09uR E Hvr WY]IJ IYOR I Fn: 9093R1960 WM:�eM1.I I � � Np f.xa_I 9.w9111°N IMIxs71 ny°wb r'"M_w_. rI tr.N Lsm.gY9 n9Axm1 e7 uA oil a 9neto Qmwps / AL NOE GRAVEL BELT 1 O°• '� JC . ONG FOOTPRINT OF RUCWRE( AL) VEGETATION MANAGEMENT MAP LEGEND B ': %'� �• Syffftl DesaiPlion IF 7 � J tl Ful¢L GATE -, xplrnETt.. 01MrA�N �as. Pvwl' RESIDENCE m m ;®:" �f O W i z:9O1 TiFNII .C.� ^.. �I a C LL • \ LU Y-6'NIDI --mdtuif avENM..•. I �.�r+�wr �....�r�irw�i..rr w�: / GARAGE U .0''1IOE O C7 • .• COIT:..HTI1C' A '! IllO I , I JA CH K W.GATE II \ v 1401 COLMM •L' SJWW 11.L 4 �I STs DRIVEWAY GATE/ Itt 5'-6•ItlO1 W.I.RNCF �t M-1 0' 1ON 225'30' N 5 F 0' ararLu PLANT LEGEND WATER SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE FACTOR OIY. COMMENTS pp TREE Citrus spp. Fruit free IS qal M 4 Standard Trunk Koelreulerio bipinnala Chinese Flame Tree 24' Dox 0 0 — Lophostemon confertus Brisbane boa IS gal M 1 Standard Trunk —— 1 SHRUB ORosa a 'Flower Carpet Pink' Pink Carpet rose 5 gal M 24 PERENNIALS IL Lantana monl-idensis Troiling Lonlana 1 gal M 6 ' RILL YAY OLantana m. 'New Gold' New Cold Lonlono 1 gal M 14 GROUNOCOVER Ior �eaw T UpY�Y.G inroo Sedum spalhilololium Sedum tats M 73 plant ® 12' o.c. � i A101M�°°°�n Fa srhe 1 m2n lz4e Cazania ripens leucolaeno Troiling Gozanio (lois M 26 plant ® 12•o.c. // +�•.�••.•� LAWN Tall Fescue spp. sod H 220 Marathon II or equal '! RESIDENCE 1 z M -- �j i ns r 0- N. z _ 6 ^SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL •, e� 1 c2 1 t� W Z to Dui �I G If NOTE:All landscape areas will be irrigated with an automatic weather r 12 smart irrigation controller. CM 2 CmE��PNT LAING DETAIL IN SECTION �ROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL , - 0' 10' 20'25'30' F�� 4 IRRIGATION NOTES IRRIGATION LEGEND 1.n n u.,w•m.•+Iv a In.nq•um CeM,«1p w 1mr+mc•n.rprl.••••via•al«mcw,acwm a.pa amr mm 1•w .•lw.q rtes.aF.a1rY rq nlr:c R.EmF«•p oe r.Pw r wpm.,tl,n.aFer•e1 wcl w p.>Nr,m b •m rr •ane aowY••b Iea M.M Lonlr•ar rw•ww0irgl•b v•Y Wrwr o•nb••la•Ir IM 1•c•e•n•n• Y•n aroc.r a vw sa•••a rr alta•uwnin••b.u„en rve.•p•ne ppiq.•h. C rv-v • a.ri.cr•r«w r.••.•a.anal acld u.V.go•m•/pm,Y rn...m u•.a•rrq•.1,•n a.aa:m+n m.b1e O •an'�n•roJP'-1 Onl mMnn•ddrvc•pn.p•e•611r•«•..r 4RwrcY n Uw ante On+n.on.nY Na mqM rn1 M••bm r - •eb•wd a w e•apn a In•Fp•een m1•m swn omF«ems••6p•r•nw.•d a appal b w almlbn a • pw•o. rI�wm,a[� [ Owwr�wOwi1•a 1•p•wMaw.F W rml M,nV�•Em is M pVlannM.On C•^V«Ir.MP NTm•Id rpyemAiq,b mr••a•wwr•nraupn Is uw.en � �•r�LL•dl�.vOrr uu+w y C•,a � _ _ !M CmV•cIr Nal aq•F.coreFtl•.mC w1 lar mr rr au n•prem•e•r••.:N. ®�ps..l.ipr m�•�U ql rMI.fltli �_ • rl••Cm4valr Nd b rmwn•r•ab•aea Ir m1 R'�1•^+i1 nb•epar•1 p•pnr,e0P't w•rr�mn M•«b �m "gym rant:y _ r mr tllnr a�Pn9rb rwbicepp•int no•••r umbW. � we fowl p urea �_ m•Cwr«Ir and rtes/war p.,•r.pit 1•conalVcuen.i•Ppl par Nrr.,•c.•a.wn u.Mr Drat. .,.o��• - _ -- __ a•a m w ew.wa od ur«IW vF.•rw0aq.1 m••rq•mr POM a<mn•cem b u•bM•cm• _ -_ - _ _ _- e IweTnT .tom u Pa•a.a,.e.as..uom 1 weose,r+r as __ ____ ________ _ o �.I.r•..•P•••Ll•,rn•Ca n••cw'r dd•••bwl•a d a w true p vomac ® wm _ P, rw.. n • ® ow moria ma.o�m-u:wma9ia•a::e"'ir r a;;'-::'�;'••-:_'`� __ -_ - ---= 1 r n•nrry.air,u.maF.a aw•d•crq u••c•-n••a orrorww•o Fora er.Y xn.r+con w1 F•r•• N F•m eu rK-w Oa c_-'__ -__'�-- --_' -_ _ l-In n 6orMr or aryr.tent•rata 1-In rn smrlr pa esti►a.rwm.m In.cmnwlr rr•e..w �_;•----'--;'-,-;-+ , _ _- _ -- _ u'.Ir«n rml,Eao•w Boa.uw no..aw,u..rw•aw w e..,ocP.e F..l F+im pr IYI n•:a 1 e tom ' S`er01eoQ - -_ ; `a.. '_"_____ - HILL YAM ..NW._ i'- e r wOn a van•,al•w;1..•aura.one cr•Oa mN mer op+q rw•a FrPwe F scr•.wa w we r..•.•r waa i--'=:......._ _----"--' - - _ _ ______ _____• ' ARiR mm,a•a•a Ie.sa.w.r•••e.nrd.a aa,.oo.aw a.pPc..r ran Pxa rw e.•rM•:npn a au1•Wl uc1 �-:_ --,_ b �ra.'un aawpr a F.ova w a r..wa cPMca r•ww•r.•.a a narsaM•a.Ir u•,Nara Fmw•1 w1c. �--__--___ __ _ -_ _ _'_ �__-._'--__" rw pater wn^e- Ga ' [_--•.--- - IWl vwr i•1 a•a I. mMa,PPp rm and soMrn b F•w yarn m Uw ewwry• Its w•Ni1Wpn tl w.....pn•••PmMI••.W 1 - _ - __ - I caNMa.a a a•vr P10 ry M WP.w•.N e•rr••i••aM n1w1••W M M rpMwa rn W rN N tlr 1 F-: Wien Illi tl ta•r•j•clim. '- ' rN: Wien laY 10.r+'pales^•a•pwml••1 allrna•e•1 lar War+!and M b1•Ma•.Par m•wl«arr'•rsmmrrwrr•ew ____________ __ ----------- -------------- --------------- a ______ _ __ .wrrF•�� 11.leo IuOnq aM•M F,Ieba F Dater.•.c(rw..e•waane)1e'owq,aRo l'war IFr Fcr.Or•a•.Ob m.p•a..0 _ ___ ____ ____ !'a•P•Ph nn1.+•l-w••a•Ip oar.•En:1l.+o•caq tl P•paa•1 we a.w..e.rd:q rrd a rnpv cbra F ___ _________ __ t f1P1••in u-•eapaa r!'w cmlr IN •wtr pores tynl avw7 l^•Nap/r•P•e�•^'r^•hiOFi'^" 1 ___ _ _ ______ ___ _ ' p•wneb.r 1•ur•r.•cIm•r up caw.•m••m•i•�.tl.w•I Il+•nate a e4 m•a9!•m.m•>/.•ca,Pn r•aa i ___ -_ -__ _ rW a up 1. for nq•pwt,(ac Z—w pam) •Id lar..orw••o• r•M.a.••n 6- __ __ _____ _ _ eP1••.WP ang—1••iFi NM a amrsl•a b SCMba•Y PYO•mar me•.•aur r mddh d+•Frml'e m iu PI°". py ______ ________________ E -�rI res.r.rn•1•cmlm w••.qw bM•.�cor.w.aria pw•r..••r.•1.w rate•°'•••l•o•e F nr•Pea.pw mw' (� -;--__ _ _ _ __________ I Ino.n F eroN,c•rwa••.Y�1 Ui man.r r,d e•tarot,crMoc.r erpowa rate ma as a n+n.a •Jj .. i ,,i 'c.r:1r vPN ww.,xc.r. Ir pnw..F.w•Ic P.D.O.Nwww adc m.•pi...cmn•clm n.rw �' •,-. _ m•c x wo.� 1 - _ I I"f 13.Fald d eWno.r•.ri•P^••.rt••ante a Prne er••m IN P••a a•w•wlm Ona u.•«•nP.p•.mN w w l Z aw maY.rna awem a r.•«•+a.rrwlr.•e•arwec cmuaN.me w•Pp•..a b w i.n.r. !(I(/ _ r _ 1 3 •.1W VC aKVap par wrw tl w,•VWr bc•!v W b pwON N ours.11q Emuecly Y•d rp•Pn Ib •' r__ •, P mwann Imm e.wcV:ca arca N i,••mVrAr. 1 v van•rew�a�av RESIDENCE p w W m Tar Wr••Rle.l1.4w4Rr••R•Gspwlmb 1 _____ _ _ �� ,^ W ,•, �^� __ iI LU -------------- ------------- r......•*•w....r u.9.•WI pnwlill•.wrw1 _______'' _ ------------------- ---------- ---- ' - _ - 11 res 1m•1•m _ _ .�1 ..a___�!_rr—+���_`-_______-._ _ _ 1 11•ti R'r • nmw.•m ______�� ______�r_� ` FaVN E1•.q,4.ii-i•O,an 1.r� ___ _ ___ _ _ __ _- _ _�_ ____ _ �J _ try ri•.�. cost aarll�a _______ _ 1• ._-1?____._r��__________ ___ � W = cru.a..r...+r w .•1ap1�•nu«•wr.p+1 •"^^r"'w�' a.sl�wm•ap�pw.,rq LU 17" ..[_''__-_�-- -' - - ___ _ If u. �,••n r.�+m.�P.p•carpl..mm+1 ___ __ _____ _ _______ __ _ _ ___ m 5 �•�__ 1 .1 a I 1-•• qac/ 9{y� I hFr u oeiw•m F.wV10a.prml • • f 0 0 < Z< •s,lwaow Y• •e •r �• 1 �'R s,[raoP aN¢ ir U ul R n urmarrr rm •1 IVa1Mi MaA Tm. II EDULE iE RB IRRIGIITIOM!C �• _p Yeobi N ARE" 'P" caoissawnGnmilam rinlaar Noaaraw water Um I Lum .D Il IW mlr �4 11 oslsn Ir.r.. as I 1•` li,.rw P•r • s • • e a e • • • • • aPr•PI•~P.•r r n n n n a a: a 11 a n • non P•1•�, 1 1 • • a + • . • • ! ! b^�g.. a a • 1 • + l r s 1 a a f r ter tear w1..N. 1 �•• a 1• i• A 10 a1 Y Y M N 11 li iPm1•rrr• N M O Im 1l0 IY W:l• 110 "Jul. � ��_� :ti p,,, Nwab•p..a nra•�nm.P.anp.. snRe.+.cr� nl e.nw.w1•saw�pw.IPrN+... NOTE: 0'SEE SHEET F-4 FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS f 10' 20'26'30' FWE91 GRADE REVISIONS BY —601 E�NGLosU�REss sICEI PAVING VALVE BOK INSERT FEMME 1 r FEBCO BAClO"LOW PALVENTER O1TC1 SEE SPECS. (A�OIPIEP (] r MOOEI BZSr VSl A ICINC 0U5N1NG LInF iWSHING i r OR WpFtmo EOUAL SLEEVES VALVE TLOSOMM-I YPI y 1/Z'iPl r PAMNC BALL VALVE 6-CONCRETE I POLYEMAENE SLAB 1 1]-YW. POLYCIHTLENE TERN r IZ•YIN. 1 BRASS T-STRAWCR IB• TUBING 111TH F InISx M/Ip MESH(S.S.) 5AWLL55 STEEL BR EKIW151 HEADER) GRADE BRASS NIPPLES NOTES CUYP AND FITTINGS 1. ALL PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVES TO BE SCH 40 PIPE. SPICK SUPPGRTS i 7. SLEEVES TO BE AT LEAST MCA ME LINE SIZE. (THREE) —{I- 1. MECHANICALLY IMP 10 95%COMPACTION. 1 !/1-LAAYEI SUMP I LSLELy ES (1 CUBIC FOOD MTS ■ ' ,5Y.W.CONIFoOrwGC Techline LINE FLUSHING VALVE MALE ADAPTER REMOTE CONTROL IRIWelO TOIaT) NTE g n BACKFLOW PREVEN7ER VALVE WITH ax MIL U" FILTER AND PRY y.15 "..m kul 1KNne SIMIONNECTIONME NO NE ERCA m THtefNVW CV RISINGNEA PERIMETERFu. ®C1919EeSEE IFCAFT NS LEGENDSEEGIRGATION FORIRRIGATION LEGEND RDW SPACING PE ETE F LATERALS FOGE� Sa>n e. AFWox rNW FL=VA SPL.EE OED TO e i• , Off, rtusx vMUE W e'vavL Baa iWNe.F N-SEE OETNI yOpR/R61UMV-I • ♦ w yP,N a/. awf cum TECHIINE CV END FEED LAYOUT 2" e w mNc.FPme F H RTA � M a/e•yN[ ' •�`-• rD © e4 R ; yWiT..1°aMv IREAMx e/LWvm F w suisl;x� Z RAA[ SMN?I "eytlOL YgMI NI AOIF EOGF PER IIIIAP.�G$. ]/a-DISC F61ER OFO)5-110 1 D_ YMfBpIE REMOTE CONTROL IYGH ROW:PRV015HFa5VM .. BL VALVE 1'FPi LOW FLOW:PRVO/5LFaN3K 16� W [ 0 HOSE BIB t v ® _FHA �,u a Nna.a Mux wv[ NO sc- 'SAN ® INTArr LM'aleol wIW L.u,mlo-v,nu E N Aesm aMl vALR-LW:sn jq�ijJ��gL�pij ,g�Pjgj�,p)gj�pi��yjq]�� (D aPNs vPc 1E ® '�° el��wlox' uvKElR sv[ 81PA✓oAfPBfA df9dfP.LrPk7P,NP F O -Nrv[.nF.a•vuc[vlmw, �IA T 1 .SIA E.a0 II B PVC OR POLY [oWw—Rua Ve6 [f vN VE BRICK CORNER) 1 AVE R.PEA IED BUSIIWG TaT O NUyBEp GR1 (I--FA CORNER) GTAVEL SUMP VALVE BOA LATERAL UNE Q .M.[Wool wml a.Iuaw, 1 vzc n` HIGH/LOW FLOW CONTROL ZONE ASSEMBLY \� 1®Itif-UJON fN UWR•Olf-1A Del NTS 0 vix TpIALL VP[i-a RF vLv[ �� U O e O Cwy,1l Ilfv AC. �1 y V Of Tmm!e•v AL F'fe K O 7 1•VALVE BOX ABOVE GRADE D'COVER. 1 oO e R�L[T�L1WiALLL[R l �O Q O FINISH GRADE/TOP OF MLACHNIBC [IWPNL[O,(/ RO Av[p V[AIH@ ShIRM pe G U LNE'9!BENL VALVE LeLE [uAMW Lwl 11 N PVC MALE ADAPTER A[Che IB 1 � I/2 CU FT PEA GA ­W,VEL �[ SCH 40 MAINLINE 1 n•• o�[A08$ IaalaP� 11 m�sIa sFllow[R wo ' r.Iv �Z BALL VALVE NT5 `FI WEATHERMATIC SMART LINE SERIFS CONTROLLER V NT5 1 1� FM-4 [ • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA CHO DECEMBER 17, 2013 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California L_... CAI.) To ORDER:.: ACTION Roll Call 7.00 P.M. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca_ Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X • Alternates: Ray Wimberly X Frances Howdyshell� D Lou Munoz r r I F Q �! Lia 11 El�'1 r The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397- PETE VOLBEDA-Site Plan A. Approved as and architectural review of a proposed 4,041 square foot single-family presented. residence with a 1,009 square foot attached garage on a 20,624 square foot lot on the north side of loamosa Court and west cf Heilman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District, located at 9260 loamosa Court -APN: 1061-011-17. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new,small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single-family residence in a residentially zoned district. • EXHIBIT B 1 of 2 Item D&E 15 AN DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA DECEMBER 17, 2013 B. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00775-JAMES SCARFUTO-Site B. Approved as Plan and architectural review of a proposed 5,254 square foot single-family pfesented. residence located on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District,located at 9250 loamosa Court-APN: 1061-611-16. Related file: Variance DRC2013-00777. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single-family residence in a residentially zoned district. PUB CQ None. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. AWO 7:20 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2of2 Item D&E16 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag December 17, 2013 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00775 - JAMES SCARFUTO - Site Plan and architectural review of a proposed 5,254 square foot single-family residence located on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District, located at 9250 loamosa Court - APN: 1061-611-16. Related file: Variance DRC2013-00777. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single-family residence in a residentially zoned district. Project Proposal: The applicant proposes constructing a single-family residence on a vacant lot located on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue. A Variance is being requested to reduce the required 60-foot rear yard setback to 30 feet. Staff supports the Variance request as the approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT16461) included a Variance (DRC2003-00902) that reduced the required 200-foot lot depth. The result is a substandard lot on which it would be very difficult to design a residence without the requested rear yard setback reduction. The proposed residence conforms to all other Development Code requirements including design, lot coverage, and setbacks(front and side). • Staff Comments: Staff is pleased with the final design of the residence. The Ranch style (Country) design theme including wood siding and steeper roof pitch has been carred to all elevations. Staffs only concern is that the residence is at the maximum 25 percent lot coverage, which will preclude the applicant from adding any additional solid roof structures on the lot in the future. Major Issues: None. Secondary Issues: None. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee forward the project to the Planning Commission for final approval as presented. Desion Review Committee Action: The project was approved as presented. Members Present: Fletcher, Wimberly, and Granger Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag Item D&E17 • RESOLUTION NO. 14-01 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00775, SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 4,805 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 762 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE ON A 23,958 SQUARE FOOT LOT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IOAMOSA COURT AND WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9250 IOAMOSA COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1061-611-16. A. Recitals. 1. James Scarfuto filed an application for the approval of Minor Design Review DRC2013-00775, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of January 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by 9 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing January 22, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The site is located within the Very Low(VL) Development District; and b. South, east, and west of the site are residentially zoned lots within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District; and to the north is a vacant lot owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District which is also within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District; and c. The applicant proposes constructing a 4,805 square foot single-family residence with a 762 square foot attached four-car garage; and d. The project complies with all development criteria except for the 60-foot rear yard setback. The applicant has submitted a request for a Variance to reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 60 feet to 40 feet; and e. The original subdivision (SUBTT16461) included a Variance (DRC2002-00902) permitting • a reduction in the required lot depth; and Item D&E18 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-01 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00775-JAMES SCARFUTO January 22, 2014 Page 2 f. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Fletcher, and. Granger) on December 17, 2013. The Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan in that the applicant is constructing a single-family residence on a residentially zoned lot. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that the proposed residence is in keeping with the rural environment of the Very Low(VL) Development Districts; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code in that the project meets all development and design criteria except for the rear yard setback for which the applicant filed a Variance request; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that the proposed single-family residence is similar in design quality and intensity to the neighboring residences; and 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the construction of a limited number of structures, including a single-family residence. The project entails constructing a single-family residence on a residential zoned lot. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, in that the proposal does not propose modifying or expanding the existing structure. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval for the construction of a 4,808 square foot single-family residence with a 1,009 square foot attached garage on a 23,958 square foot lot, located at 9260 loamosa Court-APN: 1061-611-16. 2) All walls that are visible from the public right-of-way shall be decorative (i.e. split face, slump stone, or stucco), including having a matching decorative cap. At a minimum, the walls shall include a decorative pilaster at each corner and adjacent to the gates. Item D&E19 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-01 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00775-JAMES SCARFUTO • January 22, 2014 Page 3 3) The window and door surrounds shall either be wood or of a simulated wood material. 4) Use a matching rollup door for the hobby room/gym as used for the garage door. Engineering Services Department 1) Any seepage pits within 8 feet of the public right-of-way requires sign off of the Engineering Services Department. Seepage pits must meet the requirements of the current adopted California Plumbing Code. 2) Install drive approaches and street trees per City Standards or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3) Have a registered civil engineer revise City Drawing #1692 for the improvement(s) listed above prior to Building Permit issuance (plan check fees apply). 4) All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans. The public improvement plan shall govern if there is any discrepancy between the public and private improvement plans. 5) Prior to work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an Engineering Construction Permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other required permits. 6) The following Development Impact fees are due prior to Building Permit issuance (fees subject to change): Beautification Fees: $0.20 per square foot Drainage Fees: $10,660.10 Park Fees: $4,396.00 Transportation Fees: $4,656.00 Item D&E20 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-01 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00775-JAMES SCARFUTO January 22, 2014 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of January 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item D&E21 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT • ' DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-00775 SUBJECT: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW APPLICANT: JAMES SCARFUTO LOCATION: 9250 IOAMOSA COURT—APN: 1061-611-16 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: �. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-01, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. • 1 Item D&E22 Project No. DRC2013-00775 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits(such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 6. . Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 9. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 10. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48400t corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 11. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 2 Item D&E23 Project No. DRC2013-00775 Completion Date 13. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), _/ rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 14. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 15. For residential development, return walls, and corner side walls shall be decorative _/_/_ masonry. D. Building and Safety VHFHSZ Single-Family Standard Conditions NOTE: Construction of the home must be in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and/or the California Building Code Chapter 7A.This home is located in the VHFHSZ. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating ® and air conditioning; and 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (DRC2013-00775). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday • through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 3 Item D&E24 Project No. ORC2013-00775 Completion Date New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive requirements. 2. The house, garage and any other structures as required must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. 3. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 4. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind"instructions. 4 Item D&E25 • RESOLUTION NO. 14-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2013- 00777, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 60-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK TO 40 FEET FOR A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IOAMOSA COURT AND WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9250 IOAMOSA COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1061-611-16. A. Recitals. 1. James Scarfuto filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2013-00777, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22th day of January 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing January 22, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The site is located within the Very Low Development(VL) District; and b. South, east, and west of the site are residentially zoned lots within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District; and to the north is a vacant lot owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District which is also within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District; and c. The applicant is requesting a Variance in order to construct a 4,805 square foot single-family residence with a 762 square foot attached three-car garage (DRC2013-00775); and d. The project complies with all development criteria except for the 60-foot rear yard setback; and e. The shape of the lot makes it difficult to layout the residence on the lot without a reduction in the 60-foot lot depth requirement; and • f. The Variance will reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 60 feet to 40 feet. Item D&E26 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-02 VARIANCE DRC2013-00777 -JAMES SCARFUTO January 22, 2014 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. Without the reduction in the required lot depth, the applicant would be required to significantly redesign the proposed residence to adhere to the required rear yard setback. . b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The subdivision of which the subject lot is a part included a Variance reducing the lot depth significantly below the 200-foot lot depth requirement. c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specked regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. Without the Variance, the applicant would have to design a house that is much more shallow than other houses in the same development district. d. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. It is common practice to grant reductions in the rear yard setback when the project site is substantially deficient in meeting the minimum required lot depth. e. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Variance will only minimally affect the outward appearance and will not intensify the use of the project site. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15105, which covers minor alterations in land use requirements including building setbacks. The project entails a reduction in the required rear yard setback because of a lot depth deficiency. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, in that the proposal does not propose modifying or expanding the existing structure. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5.. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the reduction in the rear yard setback requirement from 60 feet to 40 feet in order to construct a single-family residence located at 9250 loamosa Court-APN: 1061-611-16. Item D&E27 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-02 VARIANCE DRC2013-00777 -JAMES SCARFUTO • January 22, 2014 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of January by the following vote-to-wit: • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item D&E28 STAFF REPORT • PIANN NG Dn'ARTMEIVT DATE: January 22, 2014 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT- MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397 — STEVE SAGE - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,041 square foot single-family residence with a 1,009 square foot attached garage on a 20,624 square foot lot on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District, located at 9260 loamosa Court - APN: 1061-611-17. Related file: Variance DRC2013-00388. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including the construction of one single-family residence in a residentially zoned district. VARIANCE DRC2013-00388—STEVE SAGE -A request to reduce the required 60-foot rear yard setback to 30 feet for a proposed single-family residence (DRC2013-00397) on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District, located at 9260 loamosa Court - APN: 1061-611-17. Related file: Minor Design Review DRC2013-00397. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, which covers minor alterations in land use requirements including building setbacks. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Minor Design Review DRC2013-00397 and Variance DRC2013-00388 through adoption of the attached Resolution with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Proiect Density: 2.11 dwelling units per acre North - Vacant Land; San Bernardino Flood Control District, Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Single-Family Residences; Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Vacant Lot; Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-Family Residence; Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - Very Low Residential East. - Very Low Residential • West - Very Low Residential Item F&G1 J PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397 AND VARIANCE DRC2013-00388- SAGE RESIDENCE January 22, 2014 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. Project Proposal: The applicant is requesting site plan and design review of a 4,041 square foot single-family residence with a 1,009 square foot attached four-car garage. The project is within the Equestrian Overlay District and there is a 15-foot wide trail along the north property line of the site. The project complies with the all development criteria except for the 60-foot rear yard setback. The applicant has submitted a request for a Variance'to reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 60 feet to 30 feet.. The original subdivision (SUBTT16461) included a Variance (DRC2003-00902) permitting a reduction in the required lot depth. The lot is approximately 135 feet deep, significantly below the 200-foot lot depth requirement. B. Variance: The applicant has requested a Variance to reduce the rear yard setback from 60 feet to 30 feet. Staff feels that it is reasonable to permit a reduction in the rear yard setback because of the lot originally being approved with a reduced lot depth. The findings of fact below support the necessary findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: 1. Fact/Finding : Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of this Code. Without the reduction in the required lot depth, the applicant would have to significantly redesign the proposed residence to adhere to the required rear yard setback. 2. Fact/Finding : There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. The subdivision of which the subject lot is a part included a Variance reducing the lot depth significantly below the 200-foot lot depth requirement. 3. Fact/Finding : Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Without the Variance, the applicant would have to design a house that is much shallower than other houses in the same development district. 4. Fact/Finding : The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. It is common practice to grant reductions in the rear yard setback when the project site is substantially deficient in meeting the minimum required lot depth. 5. Fact/Finding : The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Variance will only minimally affect the outward appearance and will not intensify the use of the project site. C. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Fletcher, and Granger) on December 17, 2013. The Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. Item F&G2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397 AND VARIANCE DRC2013-00388 - SAGE RESIDENCE • January 22, 2014 Page 3 D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as both a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the construction of a limited number of structure including a single-family residence, and as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, which covers minor alterations in land use requirements including building setbacks. The project entails permitting the construction of a single-family residence on a legal residential lot and a reduction in the required rear yard setback because of a lot depth deficiency. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, in that the proposal does not propose modifying or expanding the existing structure. The Planning Manager has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on his own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received any letters or phone calls expressing concern with respect to the application requests. Respectfully bmlitted, V • Candyce Bu ett Planning Manager CB:TV/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Design Review Committee Action Agenda for December 17, 2013 Resolution of Approval for Minor Design Review DRC2013-00397 Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2013-00388 • Item F&G3 TO NC O ALL Ll WALLS EXPOSED YARDPUBLIC VIEW INTLYAIRD RETAINING VARIANCE REQUEST TO REDUCE REAR YARD TO 30 FT RENRN WALLS AND PlLASIERS SHALL BE DECORATIrL VACANT MASOVRY(I.E.. SPLIT-FACE, SLW.UMP-STONE OR STUCCO FO YArCH HOUSE. IN ALTLXOOU TND WALLS LOCA TEO EXIST 6 FI HT CHAIN LINK FENCE OWNER'S INFORMATION PaRaLLEL TO EACH O/HER(DOUBLE WALLS)SHALL BE MINIMIZED OR EUMINA TED BY USING APPROPRIATE GRADING/ PROPOSED 6 FT HT BLOCK WALL OWNER: MR AND YRS SIEVE SAGE LANDSCAPING OR.IF POSSIBLE,CONSTRUCTING A SINGLE WALL. SPUT FACE TAN COLOR — ALL WALLS TAN COLOR. ALAMOSAaR. 174 FT PLCLAREMONT,CA.91711 9L 24;-0 __ PH: 909 519 8321 1.. �.1�+ EXISTING 15FT XISTING 15FT Parcel #1061611170000 EASEMENT •i EASEMENT / PY 15692 Lal 5 _ EWES TRAIN TRAIL EOUESTRAIN TRAM LO i AREA 20,624 SO FT 0' 9 3 Q LIV.NG AREA 4011 SO FT GARAGE AREA 1011 5X2 FT I.T�LLR�1 Z iDOT PRINT 5,156 SF ALLOWED 20,624 X 25X- 5156 SO FT 0 5,156 SF SHOWN am Z 1 25%LOT COVERAGE an ZO -e' PROPOSED 6 FI Hi WALT INDEK 10 PLANS ® w o, SPLIT FACE TAN COLOR i 1Y1 GAIL m O (NOT IN FRONT YARD i 1.1 DRA NAGE PLAN Z P SETBACK) 2 FLOOR PLAN O :- w ) — 11 } ROOF PLAN m 4 FRONT k REAR ELEVATION �] L 5 SIDE ELEVATIONS r�') �. w� rF _ (D pop r I 3 PROPOSED lf7 2 1 T 36"NT TAN SPLIT FACE BLOCK T+� M WALL IN FRONT SETBACK C7"V - � PROPOSED 6 FT HI WALL / LIT FACE FAN COLOR FRONT AREA FT DRIVEWAY AREA 1650 1650 SO FI LANDSCAPE AREA 2314 SO FT WI GATE ppp LANDSCAPING AND PLANTING SHALL EXCEED SOX OF FRONT YARD AREA PROPOSED _ -- 36"Hi TAN$PUT FACE BLOCK W ..__ WALL IN FRONT SETBACK O� — SET ACK = a 2 W a OD _ �Z O a Z --- I < oU 12'- ' a V tL 00 m �_ IOAMOSA, RANCHO CUCAMONGA ~ th n o U LL o. p Z M� Lo 0 Z Lu o VACANT w ujo SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN �' 1 6 9E)vj wall • ------------ ......... . ............. ....... ............................... ni 1 .......... ------ 13 ------- LA u+uaui ...........itU4........ r-1 20 3 DRC2013-00397/00388 ETE RESIDENCE FOR MR AND MRS STEVE SAGE 160 IN BENSON AVE D.IPLAND.CA 9786 IOAMOSA, RANCHO CUCMAONGA TEL 909 373 fl50 L9'8d wa}I ' {12 PIT .... .......... ` F•y j S -------------- --- 4 i 1 g0 m s � � Z 4:12 PITCH y, R i w � , > I i m 1 i_ 1 I I . r � B 4:12 PITCH 1 10 ey�I 1 4erA3i 11 -- 13— ?013 �. ao PETE VU68EX PIS ��.. DRC2013-00397/00388 000® +lol® - v " 160 N BENSON AVE D,IPLADD.CA 91786 L.+ RESIDENCE FoR MR AND MRS STEVE SAGE TEL 909 J7J 850 IOAMOSA, RANCHO CUCMAONGA - w goo ran v� w n[ImotII a aAn Amu 1 'I� v v o a rlulm oai Rll AMAL ^ 1��YOm 9(ACN 1 ,•moi b 11A16' �N SIM S 1 p 1• N O SMOOTH PLASTER OVER WINDOW TRIM l U TYPICALp V-6 7d. J HINDOW SILL 2 RAFTERS TAILS 3 RAFTERS TAILS ' 4 DECORATIVE VENT 5 d CONCRETE ROOF TILE STUCCO :5 59 Q DECORATIVE —1 m O' w z - - a i Ills n HIM 1J E L•Y b ________.._____..______ _____1 SMOOTH PLASTER REAR ELEVATION '�`E"b''� '•''°"OVER WINDOW TRIM l'— TMCAL VINYL FRAMED MNDOWS FAN COLOR TYP. -----CONCRETE ROOF TILE EAGLE 3118 TERRA COTA GOLD IDAHO QUARTZITE-STONE VENEER PAINT DE 6,194 DECORATIVE VENT U STUCCO DE 6193 � w YI in � V Z D; � O m Z 7 l'1 Q U fl O Z g ® a Q - I W U --PLASTER OVER FOAM / O DECORATIVE NICHE SILL TRIM VdIN M-. STONE VENEER INSERT FRONT ELEVATION CAE Lb'IG.IA-OF q ,I 69'8A wall Oil L $N S r A m cn m --1 D m N r -1 < r— D m -i . G Z —Dj O Z 4 a I I I 1 Y' t (1pI `�t t0't3 i Hit",Lltr� I I 1 ; -... 1 , --- 2013 DRC2013-00397/00388 .- - also[__. POE 180 N BENSON AVE D.IFLAPD,CA 91786 RESIDENCE FOR MR AND MRS STEVE SAGE TEL 909 373 O50 w IOAMOSA, RANCHO CUCMAONGA [ease '19].10gh T131 xllx 01M �- - __ AREA CALCULATION tsgr s, 1b07 v'l M x 77 7u.N37i1 -_ - - 1 �'/ ` SW�e uiMlcaq 4b,. - nl'ln 9'Y 0']ll YG117 Ix.Og107YA1 ` ',` \\,I' I \ 5 1.� •1 'LJy �•O.f�.i b�relY .0u]0')TI6l]D 0/171 Nhl n`7]M1I.UD,Y7] ,'' T1 ;�� TI T 3 11 T 3 1.; T�; ;T 2 �. -`..' , „S '"" , �I,rin•,u an•M 11NB1Ll n•7nn T \ \ r , ;' T-7 I'�� \ - .rmD 7p n•11mo m•lgy3 ` J - ,�J 1 ...�.... �i 11 M1.29 i r��{i �( 'Y 5-2 'S3 \I / T:4:: r •I %, 71 0"11'B loon , .• ;,: =`P4 �, 3��;,5 o 0 WATER CALCULATION 3''{ A=f*g W the CaSirNe li ftetlp15wie9mnent Inbrnw&n Sewn Rancho Cucmirgs doms not have m ETC rnmsumtmt stMUM J Tho ETo tnYn was gkuYbO based—the—thly aver90o ETo d s-' ... Pgmrta(nrl0er 7M eM 10%krcreem:47.51X 110%.6226 ., The Madlmrm APOW Water No.ence IMAWN d oto deslan 6: .S Si-, � •. .. - MAWA-ETD X0.62X(EF adAAtnum ecler)X Rmasgps arae Sq.WU Th.tlmiprrd grdm YtchAu tem,area: ''1•�.J �., S4'ai�J`�4• rS fF: ., - .. t.5oe Special led6b wruaETo.1 m:,Q• wWA,-1.0 x 0.62 x aro x 1.955-W5 Ga9onslYmr t'i�`�•e'f,' 2.Landscape Nm(ETD.52-IM: UAWAr5215X0.62X0.70X9.435.213.995GeeurWYm . .` ri 41 � Total wwA m wwA,wwA=216.65DGelarelYw The Eetlraled Trial Water Use IETWU7)d the deelrl b: a'F S ETM-ETO X 0.62 X MWFactm)X 6f/dmmne area Sq.final 3 �/ Th.designed gram includes includes 1�UR rams: `�; Low HI,*cabne(synthetic turn-Y1gaOon by routing nR.ma -n t sees... ETM-522OX 0.52 X 0.15 X 2.20210.75.14.270 GAW.N r QO -• Me&-HO—9-4—M rm)-Mbalbn LN drlP ETWU-5225 x 0.62 X 0.50 x SAT?70.510-95.590 Gallons/Year O S3\ High•�' ,� __- ETWN-5228 (Was,Xlm5 X .5511-7dgrlonby Gulag nomas =v Erwu-5z2e x g.52 x Dees X l.Tss i aTS-54.45 Grornnmr ETwu-s225xo.62x1.954-n,aTO Ca9malYer Tn.GrmEanlrcadrgerAnm,rwaWu..IETWIne:z4o.w5Grrrrc.r -'\ �r� Xi �;• -.lV ; _ _-�xc�c. \;sees.sees... '����-:.lt...�.... WttfeX aalirstmmt -';� ,S 1 +1�.J 1•�� �'"�y' �'` � ;; Acmrdlrtg to Pomorw eweOror au9on No rettW Preck I Ion In .._/_ �,i',•'�f'�,�il�� ..` - .�j{r` / Pgnme reeb 15.95 Itch:1628 X 0.25 s 4.24 Inch. yyll y777! ' I \ The reY1i Wjusugm b:424 X 0.62 X 11.400.29.870 GYona/yer. RANCHO CUCAMONGA TIS Net ErYnr,Tout Annsl Warr Use IN THE SAGE RESIDENCE PLANTING LEGEND 240'°75-29.W0-211'005 Ga9rNYer. SYMBOL BOTANIC NAME COMMONNAME ON SIZE WATER REMARKS TREES ^RO`_ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE T-1 pessam, ekrs Ae iidubee 3 4e'BOX M PLANTING T.2 PruueC..*WSP..Crrq.oa' atoYsbasis drmy 2 4r Em M AND WATER CALCULATION T-3 tX.MI eater TWlmhl Srtbellsn sO rrg.hybrid 3 40'BOX M PLANNER ',10 T4 S.*.Ia mrnppMern R.OnooU 1 emew MM ❑[q[utIMS DATC be 00.00..2010 ❑icnr. T6 Syeprs ra nanwMa on Gnsat paha 9 46 BOX M FILE NAME le- 000OO.OWG �mautl6 6HRU139 5ERS10HID. DRAWING NO. SI SbNda AAtcea(S.imom w.knoml Na 41aad bird d prate 9 to GAL M SQ' Su.Bdar.gYtae Eyck,d paradise a 15 GALJL N w.oe.aor7 6 8 00 s P &3 Rae`.Ipmplty cow Rbm:kaphl C.0 33 5 GAL M \5.4 Agap.nOr.Orr Pm' Dwe rl Bas UV.Mh.#al. 95 S UAL M 'Hot ILYA GROUND COVERS GrIl Swft Am TMI SOD IM5 WIM H 15'X47rapals AI a,Nc:r ianm.rcoul IRRIGATION LEGEND r r 1 r f/ 1 f 1 r ,owniuf,Rwll n,m frar m. t[ar,s nR oR, ti R.m 7 wsm,rYNt. �T • WLO arwn,cv, s IYI:Ew „Pw w M bC.REEIu yv r�'Yfar ----------------------� --.._......._..................Q_.... ------------ w�i1wM •••_�•"-nrmr ,Mma•1 :.Rv:i: - I I 11 , "' I NrraY0lwlr�:rf,RnO.rmlauW.YBrlrrra.®fasOnwurOwiLs4o,oRabmo: ,I ® Nr,rrtll,R,RNmIN,Mro,m„wMsrolluKnRGrnu. I ® M,\,\ ::Or1[ovaRarRK r,l,Rla-Or sanm R.rmla, ® M :m aw,MrRwMr:r,:¢G.u,w [.setl+i ;: --------------- • I � ,rm ts.l -Reor[rRK rm.,rwo,«m.n � p r.rN tlo„r ,rrrrMRm,rM o Mn.. _ fER.:.RY•uo.,:n""EO..w. EasrRR.e� Imirnnw,rvmrwvuN Ll! 0 o eRc,wwwanmir,:-m U a r� O „v,:, ,owcar•c, RmcmwR.n`Ir:�-vrr N.w.. o.,,r.,i.. Z 0 C � rvc eu.r ..ra,Rwra,r.xwR,[N"U°Rmoi`"wuirioM:r a.RREru LNLJ E au. ."v e.o"`r .+wa a LW< ___=rr` •n:• me:,u Biro •.aw,u Nita` :�" AI � Q o�a,,wv�`ml„�•�a�:.rwaraow,R,c lttwm,rR,WRM1A,a NaIRlD I..weltf, 1 eusu,�'r-ami..rr.Nwmm�Nrr.m:,R.c,aR of r I Em,Y1r.wMllrmYYslor,RwolWlrrwl0itl.eWu,Y„ouwOOMn 3 _ A T ------- 00 vr,mK VKVE WLMII IRRK;.VWN NIRS /LL Wnao�TMAr1[uwurrMmnlrr --------------- YA ________ --------------- ---- _____ _ __ - ' � :y�rR,N11M11iylI:E 'U r RA4JWAi SCllklri It '� AM0.Sq CT �R4j.�T.;i�'1!l>.1��. � ArR Mwro00nEC.O NIr'/W I„lSf,lE, MAN VIF.K' ^� '!”'•'1` `I'�" ,rinMvmaimRafntl•,..etlMnacr.Mra nnMr,.oR.0 M,ww:u,c,icr„R.::,aRro f••:�:��.'":,•'��:�;��::`••�••:•: .m,e,tlwu NI•..rw.uaaualne Kw NP_1SLIRECALCCLYM .n.tY. - .oYr:'see rcroeln,e--u,unRnamu sr.NlMOfmlrRtuml Crl n„rM0 E:Om! RKX*AMLNI*D MAIN rEWAW--t IRAl5: a-�'�` . ., arm„ms:� rr n lar: nl w`..ml_yl........�.,:.+r... ,ww�.e wr..rMUM.ornn•cawenu.nEra e r m,..r,• m�.w,.,.,ru. ..,ew:...ras...o. Ir:aotlrerts ..� � tlw.mwYNormn - voMirru,rRtsER,oMK,lt aRen.Nn:R.a tOER ro.,rllmw.tt �. . soaaRE or„oxtrr Baso ..��..,...,.:.. ..,..�~� oowror.IMarmnai Icron r'RlfFi pErW1 r10KR1iIa1MMlOR..,,Y nrl Rant MIWU IIXYJr .r-wa.s. YYnaYY�,r:Y .....-... ..:....... 4..... ,�ltl/uoltl M/Now acYLl FInMI! r:rYar.,s,ww-:eaRR.-r.aOe il,lall .r_`�_..'._T.._�_'_._.'' '"_''' MersllaMWrtN,u,o aWaNM►1:m � � aRur Nrt[r,wsYal,Rr wr rr,r,o w,a T.___.w' i—w' fn MtwelRlY,N,d,MntwnNu:Elsr E C iER,Ng rr:,tvgE,ai[R,WaFII[K3M1,r1RMEOR nEigll,oRlW rr FKRr '�[' Y Y]� QUI •....a v.u..0 a .. - luw,wtl[EwafntoiMxtw,ERrlrfslOKl MwGna:rR ,[Ii11i OO.N IK rl 1, • i'Jll 1 —�rur��,.:�r I RLMA,rrwrM,rlraarraRo,o,r:K,:, pw01 N:11 rr o,r is wr.��_� Ian Y,ww� ,mta,RR,re. irY�roRra,Nromulrrl �,ppE�aaswN�wwii L_.__....a`w's s`d'�.. oral aaltN r�ir, -�wr,.�..6q,r'�� to➢l mPa:[rrl:� r, ... Undrrgmund S#r%**AMA; r`rim:iar•Fa "•• Yi„•'•” ,.• r o--Moroem�-.,eri�'aEw��I,orro uvllwamrum:... it �y,. �tangwr[artviarsr rNuuwreRw dll:iW hN WYlrlmEl r,fV.,.R11an,Wr r\ r:RK Wr r.t ar .rir.�..._�.._. ttmnlln rK N-nrlovRKfm10 0 1 m iwwiMiw Ean MYweooxmoaEnwalarwrE NE.mEr+Rms, utrwr¢uMvniwos,Mrm„YtoRM:io'„R L1 rr:Yr NUritaNl�iO\,�,rr NwMRRln9 EW fANIR.tIpl IRYEN RErnrraE,al A taR i NIA4TM MYDVa,Mrl[rYJ11NFR N IWQWt[AIr OKMIL MYYRU[I! RAMI„a1E11,QDl. ra, umo�m, tmwiw Nouns muw3 o5m ®ten' vm%n mv3tlf11S5911e1 .4 1K]1LVifv3l1arvm1lItl/M3ANAov 1 —sv b3110II1N00 7 F Z'I eupa: I aaratlLO20rwn rrop•a•s x.om pattroaawnwx.�nN•',n 1Ooovimaosr'e"'i�.w>;e. aato.op31a10W.'o°soa�,u,oriuouaa!I,�owlmitia'�'m, ® e ar,wa:Mn�.owrox�.o.mo w { � } ,muni:arnu:m.ra oeao,'pwo'xnwwe�w,.w�:aoa,we,[„n'mil [ [ r la[w�O,ounn':'sr`m iO��'Oe � a n Z r 3 Tk =.1,._i::.: •_i,....;:;..:i,...: f-1'ir-}ili; _r,,.��li oa -li- _ :-Ji,::lf:' Ir: it=' :lti:'il:_:li='�:i s m �am,tlodwaona �I _ tlas,ro,xroar axaauaoue„m,o, :r.,.,,-�.:.r:�. :;__. _ _P � _.., n,a•wndr,t rua e i_'.-;_} ;I?=i; I_-'1:... .. �:;li;•lii:';'i 'Il�f:- �.]I.:.I 9 uo ns.o.,a,ewsxw in,tb i 13...r._-�,:.I �atlw dowwnwau,rorpa S r--j oxann — w,mt m an 1-m man1 z ®1O1" M31ANV1tI1f3L1W30�7V5 B ®wup' S3AWAX"UNWROYM H cams• d S3A3315 M a1t6"b`VWm�"irt• ll3 Al rilnB'al 3WMA X]B 7nd : r� uv,wt reoeea 3— L 3lyM tl3lYtl, macaw oa,xa w2x as eo:.pM n rF�+ ni!rnm:fin,M]�'v i �.VtlM CSWi 13a end t � JI3 YttM BWU a tl3,r3fIBwM�M92,tt tltl00[ a 1. irrOr M)xMl:alwn2Yn"aW xd cn o,H a maw,xeol,M a,anoxpo ,oM,..>r.asoma N Li _ ,wx•u,oaea0xoap ILaI ii _ W ,x • W u..EI I I li— Wo.liva6UnEI�DYIHp ` I— i�� �• 2 wluoxnnsau.'"a"u'"I 4 > i°, o`n1O°an`u I I 2 i� � �>bo•dowormwannwra i �o m rnu�arnmroouara,.M o 19 3 y waon d �011� QV3HAVIIdS V amara 3AlVA7iVB O �'+" minima J �oten 3NIINNW f n Z > C'1 Val _ m arn,rm,x,a•at ax,A,xa,aa.,,l„I:paa>r.,.b,np,Mn,,,,nprlmw;a,",:::e T ..la,.,.n,e,x,ni..apxm�alm aorepp,mxa: mx.•mtw.»a,.p. a.x t atlw.M„ a'":::'�::2.: raw drabM epWp01O)6nb xOW.rs t.wW•AN1P'Y n, ntapnx0,n,r[awM,pxnmam,Oxr waW ao WrwcM�a�2 IOLrroWrl[,eorinYA xoom p' .i i [a,o4 { wn,vx,atlrsiaw Mo,le,n,[M-f�w`,o.,�im ar.aoe our .rMamt� minn°"0,oaii:u:.o.11O caw va'a:"�"w ` } •u••••iw,"aluMo»am..,owo K.;"'.iv xo:ao.ax..a,oxaon raa aM,..rw arn.,w f• Mrr.`� - ..ri is_�`I r,nm , I,grae,ulw:Blpxmi,YY rx,tna,r,amtiesxox ij::.::l..'I ri_. [ 0' haat an Oirmlx xp:a0ra4,[m rmnxn,ww.x t I I TOTAL YARD[FRONT AND BAOJ MAN'A CALCULATIONS FROM YARD MAWA CALCULATIONS 1 tlr�•r.rwr aref tlrw t Iarrr.rrrarr.� 7J acnr, – ownrw4..mrraf.m.w.• .. 'ro,rwawrr� –7Nj. N (i��-1YVVF'„JJJI� _ r ' �'r..wara ra,garr.,. R.�a•T'...a�w.a n.� y � ,: _. ._:. - . wwnfawrr.rvrawana .. _ .anw.eww.. ;, __ l_�F-r1 a•r..fa www vwlrr 1a1 fwarT •Ial rr.r.w. s Ilara•..ama .... .I..amwa ..._..._-......... i r�'rfo.o°`iuwwr.�amwl [ �11rf1•tl..waKtlsrw xrinwrrwaaoc.urmu :•w"rrrl"`rwlW.•n[rtmm� alwro' ..'.. esurq..r°a++ �'w•[aw. a arrswYsr R•umo .-- . w YM tlalra•WNIwI R•Oa i CRK Gtass aYw• r .. .ru•atlwnal arraaavn w.rtw[c . .. ... rY1 w•.rrr• •[ as Ia •fYllerae wf'V,Ratllrlfnrlw mwl:o![mYO ; nCtllrw WaulE awW1Y • � wrlwokN(aOlEw[IB NInwa "�'•waf as�sr:wr ...... �wnw• r �M``ml emrK:r Mwm[swgWlfwwwlw/RY P w•arwnclw•wmrRRourm l Wr[Cfwc ` mtaaE W •- WIw•wrt4•rrar • • —FEW ryw.wwa• wa.ta• s1 .� �Illaa�avia ur W Z ytef 6: �1„rtaywt ... •.araq®.ratltlC D HIM VALVE AfF10® A NETARMSTARTCONNECIION ABMDLBD p 9C .,,.w,. . rug ........ .�•. ° v� .c; .. wmrnwal. w nalwa,reaw• wa:r ... LNC ................MrMw[Iar•4rae+rr awae:yea°www:+Mraw^wrQ Taw•tlY• w -.. �''0 C . 4•I•I•0 171 MI.� In ar/ 0 C V WW �! •11=,1=lrii[_ aK wuawaovurin atl�. [�wm�Yiafwaar�roor wa Yto�wara Www•.r &I ro{ x /\ [ nOT! 1[msotCalwA VY rn�[[L OeI AM•rt ar•••a 1 *Y J ; tlwEA Ma111�,1-tliOwl EMTE•TUY011 a,m6T•011 TEGIL!tlwarY — (�] W . oW nrwmr •awnwu,owarro•Ymrwoa tlarma.lm ` ,laia.wo��vrmal araYtlnawnno•or mom.roo¢II.Imlrar ar aau.oa.nw nlarr (..a LF] Q FORM YARD AND TOTAL YARD MAWA CALCL mmm E RMIMM STAID B NETARM MOM FEED LAYOUT ABE/l1L0 ABEmo O .-� N Baa g d pQ L i • y a .,wart 0.uwaM VLLMfaatl•En s urwusr loolY • , b1[CdifO[,. • ncrw lV a YEA KRRAE• 1.gfatll([tr/IM(vYVF OQ - a n[a.•wcv naawo ,wlx o(cwanlroEwv W a no•Knw[.a•wslra • rwla,aela(w N aE(oLo F Moto C NETARM BI iGuLA L LAYOUT ABFB7® M..�n • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA C%IcONO. DECEMBER 17, 2013 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER ACTON Roll Call TOO P.M. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca_ Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly X Frances Howdyshell_ • Lou Munoz_ II. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397- PETE VOLBEDA- Site Plan A. Approved as and architectural review of a proposed 4,041 square foot single-family presented. residence with a 1,009 square foot attached garage on a 20,624 square foot lot on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District, located at 9260 loamosa Court-APN: 1061-611-17. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new,small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single-family residence in a residentially zoned district. EXHIBIT B 1 of 2 Item F&G14 r DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA Ho DECEMBER 17, 2013 GA B. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00775-JAMES SCARFUTO-Site B. Approved as Plan and architectural review of a proposed 5,254 square foot single-family presented. residence located on the north side of Ioamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District, located at 9250 Ioamosa Court-APN: 1061-611-16. Related file: Variance DRC2013-00777. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single-family residence in'a residentially zoned district. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS None.. FThiss the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State lawits theCommittee from addressing any issue not previously included on the genda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. IV. ADJOURNMENT 7:20 p.m. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2of2 Item F&G15 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag December 17, 2013 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397- PETE VOLBEDA- Site Plan and architectural review of a proposed 4,041 square foot single-family residence with a 1,009 square foot attached garage on a 20,624 square foot lot on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District, located at 9260 loamosa Court- APN: 1061-611-17. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 which covers the construction of a limited number of new, small facilities or structures including the construction of 1 single-family residence in a residentially zoned district. Proiect Proposal: The applicant proposes constructing a single-family residence on a vacant lot located on the north side of loamosa Court and west of Hellman Avenue. A Variance is being requested to reduce the required 60-foot rear yard setback to 30 feet. Staff supports the Variance request as the approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT16461) included a Variance (DRC2003-00902) that reduced the required 200-foot lot depth to less than 150 feet. The result is a substandard lot on which it would be very difficult to design a residence without the rear yard setback reduction. The residence conforms to all other Development Code requirements including design, lot coverage, and setbacks (front and side): • Staff Comments: Staff is pleased with the final design of the residence. The Tuscan design theme including stone veneer and decorative rafter tails have been carried to all elevations. Staffs only concern is that the residence is at the maximum 25 percent lot coverage, which will preclude the applicant from adding any additional solid roof structures on the lot in the future. Maior Issues: None. Secondary Issues: None. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee forward the project to the Planning Commission for final approval as presented. Design Review Committee Action: The project was approved as presented. Members Present: Fletcher, Wimberly, and Granger Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag Item F&G16 RESOLUTION NO. 14-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397, SITE PLAN, AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 4,041 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A 1,009 SQUARE FOOT ATTACHED GARAGE ON A 20,624 SQUARE FOOT LOT ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IOAMOSA COURT AND WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9260 IOAMOSA COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1061-611-17. A. Recitals. 1. Steve Sage filed an application for the approval of Minor Design Review DRC2013-00397, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of January 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing January 22, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The site is located within the Very Low (VL) Development District; and b. South, east, and west of the site are residentially zoned lots within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District; and to the north is a vacant lot owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District which is also within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District; and C. The applicant proposes constructing a one-story, 4,041 square foot single-family residence with a 1,009 square foot attached four-car garage; and d. The project complies with the all development criteria except for the 60-foot rear yard setback. The applicant has submitted a request for a Variance to reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 60 feet to 30 feet; and e. The original subdivision (SUBTT16461) included a Variance (DRC2002-00902) permitting a reduction in the required lot depth; and Item F&G17 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-03 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397- STEVE SAGE January 22, 2014 Page 2 f. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Fletcher, and Granger) on December 17, 2013. The Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan in that the applicant is constructing a single-family residence on a residentially zoned lot. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located in that the proposed residence is in keeping with the rural environment of the Very Low (VL) Development Districts; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code in that the project meets all development and design criteria except for the rear yard setback for which the applicant has filed for a Variance; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity in that the proposed single-family residence is similar in design quality and intensity to the neighboring residences; and 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which covers the construction of a limited number of structure including a single-family residence. The project entails constructing a single-family residence on a residential zoned lot. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, in that the proposal does not propose modifying or expanding the existing structure. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption.. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends to the City Council approval of the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planninq Department 1) Approval for the construction of a 4,041 square foot single-family residence with a 1,009 square foot attached garage on a 20,624 square foot located at 9260 loamosa Court-APN: 1061-611-17. 2) All walls visible from the public right-of-way shall be decorative (i.e. split face, slump stone or stucco), including a matching decorative cap. At a minimum, Item F&G18 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-03 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397 - STEVE SAGE • January 22, 2014 Page 3 the walls shall include a decorative pilaster at each corner and adjacent to the gates. 3) The window and door surrounds shall either have a smooth stucco finish or be made of cast stone. 4) The rafter tails shall have a natural wood grained appearance. 5) The front door and the pedestrian garage access door shall be of a similar design to the proposed garage door and be complimentary to the Tuscan architectural design theme. 6) The stone veneer shall include a. matching stone cap and not be stucco over foam. 7) The stone veneer shall be taken down to grade and not end above the weep screed. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of January 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item FRG19 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2013-00397 SUBJECT: MINOR DESIGN REVIEW APPLICANT: STEVE SAGE LOCATION: 9260 IOAMOSA COURT-APN: 1061-611-17 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: �. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-03 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not 0 commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 1 Item F&G20 Project No. DRC2013-00397 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. I Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence.until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection.District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 9. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 10. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 11. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 12. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 2 Itpm F&G21 Project No. DRC2013-00397 Completion Date • 13. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), _/—/— rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 14. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood _/—/— gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 15. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. D. Building Building and Safety VHFHSZ Single-Family Standard Conditions NOTE: Construction of the home must be in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and/or the California Building Code Chapter 7A.This home is located in the VHFHSZ. General Requirements �— 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; and f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning. • 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation _/—/— coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. �— Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked marked with the project file number (i.e., DRC2013-00397). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the /— applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday _/—/— • through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 3 Item F&G22 Project No. DRC2013-00397 completion Date New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances I_I_ considering use, area, and fire-resistive requirements. 2. The house, garage and any other structures as required must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. 3. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 4. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind" instructions. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures &standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.cityofrc.us. E. Single-Family Residential Standard Conditions FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with current edition of the California Fire; as adopted by the Fire District Ordinance. 2. On the Site Plan to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within the vicinity of the proposed project site. Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 2. Automatic fire sprinklers: The structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with the current edition of the California Residential Code. 3. Address: Note on the plans that prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 4 Item Fkr,71 • RESOLUTION NO. 14-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2013-00388, A REQUEST TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED 60-FOOT REAR YARD SETBACK TO 30 FEET FOR A PROPOSED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE (DRC2013-00397) ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IOAMOSA COURT AND WEST OF HELLMAN AVENUE WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 9260 IOAMOSA COURT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 1061-611-17. A. Recitals. 1. Steve Sage filed an application for the approval of Variance DRC2013-00388, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 22nd day of January 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 22, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The site is located within the Very Low (VL) Development District; and b. South, east, and west of the site are residentially zoned lots within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District; and to the north is a vacant lot owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District that is also within the Very Low (VL) Residential Development District; and c. The applicant is requesting Variance in order to construct a one-story, 4,041 square foot single-family residence with a 1,009 square foot attached four-car garage; and d. The project complies with the all development criteria except for the 60-foot rear yard setback; and e. The shape of the lot makes it difficult to layout the residence on the lot without a reduction in the 60-foot lot depth requirement; and ® f. The Variance will reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 60 feet to 30 feet. Item F&G24 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-04 VARIANCE DRC2013-00388 - STEVE SAGE January 22, 2014 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. Without the reduction in the required lot depth, the applicant would have to significantly redesign the proposed residence to adhere to the required rear yard setback. b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The subdivision of which the subject lot is a part included a Variance reducing the lot depth significantly below the 200-foot lot depth requirement. c. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district.. Without the Variance, the applicant would have to design a house that is.much more shallow than other houses in the same development district. d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. It is common practice to grant reductions in the rear yard setback when the project site is substantially deficient in meeting the minimum required lot depth. e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Variance will only minimally affect the outward appearance and will not intensify the use of the project site. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, which covers minor alterations in land use requirements including building setbacks. The project entails a reduction in the required rear yard setback because of a lot depth deficiency. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; in that the proposal does not propose modifying or expanding the existing structure. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the reduction in the rear yard setback requirement from 60 feet to 30 feet in order to construct a single-family residence located at 9260 loamosa Court-APN: 1061-611-17. Item F&G25 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-04 • VARIANCE DRC2013-00388 - STEVE SAGE January 22, 2014 Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of January by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item F&G26 STAFF REPORT • PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: January 22, 2014 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00909 - NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL: A proposal to demolish an existing veterinarian office and construct a new veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of 25,705 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District located at 7289 Amethyst Avenue; the proposal includes incorporating an existing residence to the north of the site at 7271 Amethyst Avenue as part of the project; APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2007-00733, Minor Exception DRC2009-00360, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction. • MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2009-00360 - NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL: A request for a 25 percent reduction in the required parking for a proposed new veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of about 25,705 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District located at 7289 Amethyst Avenue; the proposal includes incorporating an existing residence to the north of the site at 7271 Amethyst Avenue as part of the project; APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2007-00733, Development Review DRC2008-00909 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2009-00697 - NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL: A proposed Uniform Sign Program for Development Review DRC2008-00909, a proposed veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of about 25,705 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District located at 7289 Amethyst Avenue; the proposal includes incorporating an existing residence to the north of the site at 7271 Amethyst Avenue as part of the project; APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related files: Pre-Application Review DRC2007-00733, Development Review DRC2008-00909, and Minor Exception DRC2009-00360. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2008-00909, Minor Exception DRC2009-00360, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697 by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with conditions. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00909, DRC2009-00360, DRC2009-00697- NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences(Legal, Non-Conforming); General Commercial (GC) District South- Senior Assisted Living Facility; Office Professional (OP) District East - Vacant; General Commercial (GC) District West - Commercial/Office Building and a Single-Family Residence(Legal, Non-Conforming); General Commercial (GC) District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site-General Commercial North - General Commercial South- Office East - General Commercial West - General Commercial C. Site Characteristics: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 25,705 (0.59-acre) with overall dimensions of about 158 feet (north-south) and about 165 feet (east-west) located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue (Exhibit B). The project site is developed with four (4) structures (Exhibit C). Two (2) buildings of 2,308 and 760 square feet (identified as Buildings 1 and 2 for clarity) are generally located at the south side of the project site and are occupied by the Alta Loma Animal Hospital (addressed as 7289 Amethyst Avenue). The other two. (2) buildings are a single-family residence (Building 3) of 745 square feet and a garage (Building 4) of 201 square feet and are generally located at the northwest comer of the project site. The single-family residence (addressed as 7271 Amethyst Avenue and known as the Bennett House) is a potential local landmark per the Local Inventory of Historic Resources. The majority of the site in the vicinity of the buildings used by the veterinarian hospital is paved with asphalt. Vegetation on-site is limited to low grasses and a few trees. To the north are single-family residences while to the south, across Base Line Road, is a senior assisted living facility operated by Sunrise Senior Living. To the west, across Amethyst Avenue, is a commercial/office building and a single-family residence. The property to the east is vacant. The zoning of the project site and the properties to the east, west, and north is General Commercial (GC) District. All of the aforementioned residences are classified as "legal, non- conforming" structures as they are within a commercial zone. The zoning of the properties to the south is Office/Professional (OP) District. The topography of the site is generally level with an elevation of about 1376 feet at the north side of the site and about 1370 feet at the south side. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant, on behalf of Alta Loma Animal Hospital, proposes to demolish the two (2) buildings (Buildings 1 and 2) that are currently occupied by the veterinary hospital and construct one new building of 5,710 square feet in its place. The veterinary hospital will be relocated to this building but only will occupy 4,815 square feet of it (Exhibit E). The remaining 895 square feet of the new building will be for an unspecified retail tenant. The existing single- family residence (Building 3) will be converted for office use only while the existing garage H, I,&J2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00909, DRC2009-00360, DRC2009-00697 - NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA • ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 3 (Building 4)will be demolished (Exhibit D). In order to allow the veterinarian hospital to operate with minimum interruption, the new building will be constructed in two (2) phases (Exhibit F). During Phase 1, Building 2 will be demolished first and about 4,700 square feet of the new building will be constructed. The veterinarian hospital then will be relocated into it. During Phase 2, Building 1 will be demolished and the remaining 1,000 square feet of the new building will be constructed. The architecture of the proposed building reflects the direction provided by the Planning Commission during the Pre-Application Review Workshop held on March 8, 2008 (Exhibit R). The proposed building will be of wood-frame construction and will be similar in appearance to the buildings in the general area including the single-family residences and the assisted living facility across the street. The building will incorporate key elements of the Craftsman style: a mixed combination of a hip and gable roof that varies in height and form; wainscots on all elevations finished with river rock; numerous column elements finished with river rock; building walls finished alternately with stucco or horizontal wood siding; exposed decorative rafter tails; and wood beams. The building will be painted with a palette of three basic colors. Glass will be provided on all elevations. Along the entire south side of the building and over the south entrances, there will be a large roof overhang supported by columns that will provide a strong Visual statement along Base Line Road. Secondarily, this overhang will provide shade along the sunward south elevation. At the north entrances there will be a set of prominent gable roof overhangs that will provide a focal point as seen from the parking lot. At the west entrance of the retail space there will be a gable roof and a small overhead trellis (Exhibit H). Through the use of these elements the building will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, and enhance and emphasize the character of the Old Alta Loma community. The General Plan identifies this area as the Alta Loma Neighborhood Character Area because of its significant historic resources. To ensure that the project is integrated with (existing and future) surrounding development, the east-west drive aisle along the north side of the building will terminate (as a 'stub') at the east property line that is shared with the adjacent, vacant property to the east (APN: 0202-161-09). The purpose of the 'stub' is to allow it to connect with any future drive aisle and parking area of any potential development that may occur on that property(and ultimately allow access via Base Line Road). This will provide the owner, customers, and employees of the animal hospital/retail space secondary access to Base Line Road. Similarly, this will provide the users/owner of the adjacent property secondary access to Amethyst Avenue (Exhibit 1). Staff has incorporated into the Resolution of Approval a condition that requires the applicant to provide an access easement in favor of the property owner to the east (see further discussion of the easement below). At the time a project is proposed on the adjacent property, the applicant for that project and/or owner of that property, will be required to provide an access easement in favor of the applicant. Additional site improvements include a redesigned parking lot, new landscaping, and new property line walls/fences. Included in the project is the removal of the existing driveway at • Amethyst Avenue, which is currently 75 feet north of the intersection of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue, and the construction of a new driveway that will be located further north about 120 feet from the intersection (Exhibit K). H, I,&J3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00909, DRC2009-00360, DRC2009-00697- NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 4 B. Floor Area Analysis: Per Chapter 2, Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan of the General Plan, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) in the General Commercial (GC)land use category is 25 - 35 percent. Following the demolition of Buildings 1, 2, and 4, and the construction of the new building, the total building floor area, including the single-family residence, will be 6,455 square feet and the FAR will be 25 percent(6,455/25,705=0.25). C. Parking Calculations: Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking calculations for the proposed project are as follows: Type of Use Floor Area Parking Number of Spaces Number of Spaces SF Ratio Required Provided Veterinary Hospital 4,815 1/200 24 Retail 895 1/250 4 Office (converted Single- 745 1/250 3 Family Residence Total. 6,455 31 24• 'Only 24 parking stalls are proposed. The result is a deficiency of seven (7) parking stalls. To address this deficiency, the applicant has submitted an application for a Minor Exception to allow for a reduction of up to 25 percent in the parking requirement(0.25 x 31 stalls=8 stalls) D. Land Use Comoatibilitv: .The project will be consistent with the site's Development District, the existing use on the project site, and the surrounding land uses. The most sensitive land uses adjoining the project site are legal, non-conforming single-family residences to the north and west of the project site. These land uses are not expected to be negatively impacted by the proposed project. As the project is the demolition of an existing veterinary hospital and construction of a new veterinary hospital, the impacts of the project are not expected to be significantly greater than what is present. It.is anticipated that some operational characteristics will be improved. For example, parking will be improved due to an enlarged parking lot, access will be safer as the existing vehicle entrance will be relocated further from the intersection of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue, security will be enhanced with new parking lot lighting, and aesthetically the site and general area will be enhanced with a building that complies with the City's current design and technical standards. E. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted on June 30, 2010 to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Saint Justina Church located at 8768 Helms Avenue. There were numerous property owners and interested individuals in attendance (Exhibit M). They inquired about the various aspects of the veterinary hospital including its operational characteristics (such as hours of operation), traffic(including delivery-related traffic), parking and access to the site, noise, and animal activities. The applicant and his client addressed these questions to the satisfaction of the attendees. F. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee and Technical Review Committee reviewed the proposal on August 17, 2010. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommend approval. The Committees' conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. H, I,&A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00909, DRC2009-00360, DRC2009-00697 - NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA • ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 5 G. Desion Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Burnett) reviewed the proposal on August 17, 2010 (Exhibit N). The Committee reviewed the architecture of the buildings, building plotting, site layout, landscaping, and uniform sign program (the sign program is discussed further below). The Committee recommends approval of the proposal subject to the revisions that were recommended by Staff. The only issue that remained to be resolved was the means to ensure reciprocal access for the adjacent, vacant property to the east. The applicant, on behalf of his client, indicated he preferred to provide an access agreement as opposed to an access easement. The Committee considered this request and indicated that they would approve this solution provided that it was acceptable to the City Attorney. Shortly thereafter, a draft of the access agreement was prepared by the applicant and forwarded to the City Attorney. After reviewing the document, the City Attorney determined that it was not acceptable. He indicated that the document was not sufficient for the purpose of ensuring access as it was neither comprehensive enough nor enforceable. Subsequently, the applicant indicated that he did not want to provide an easement or agreement in the absence of knowing what type of development would occur on the neighboring property. On April 19, 2011, this specific issue was forwarded to the Design Review Committee (Munoz, • Wimberly, and Granger) for consideration. After explaining the City's position and considering the applicant's concerns, the Committee reaffirmed their position that an access agreement acceptable to the City Attorney is required. They stated that the applicant had the option of advancing to the Planning Commission for review, but in the absence of an access agreement, it would be without a recommendation of approval by the Committee(Exhibit 0). There was no activity with the project until about October/November 2013 when the applicant contacted the City and indicated that he was now willing to provide the required access easement. Following a discussion with the City Attorney, it was concluded that the submittal of an access easement could be incorporated as a condition of approval. Staff determined no further action by the Design Review Committee was necessary as the applicant, on behalf of his client, is now willing to provide the access easement and that this matter was the only outstanding issue. The Committee's conditions (from the August 17, 2010 meeting) have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. H. Minor Exception DRC2009-00360: The applicant has submitted Minor Exception for a 25 percent reduction in the number of parking stalls that are necessary to fulfill the parking requirement for this project. The presence of the existing, single-family residence at the northwest comer of the project site severely limits the size of the parking lot. As noted previously, this structure is a potential local landmark/Neighborhood Character Area contributor that has a value and benefit to the surrounding community and the City prefers that the structure be protected. Options for constructing additional parking elsewhere on the site are limited due to the size and overall dimensions of the project site —the parking lot as proposed is the largest it could reasonably be without eliminating amenities such as the trash enclosure or reducing • landscaping. Reducing the floor area of the proposed building would make it impractically small and negate the purpose of the applicant's project, i.e., replacement of the existing veterinary hospital with a larger veterinary hospital. The Minor Exception, if approved, will result in a reduction in the parking requirement from thirty-one (31) parking stalls to twenty-four (24) H_ 1_&A PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00909, DRC2009-00360, DRC2009-00697-NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 6 parking stalls (0.25 x 31 = 8 stall maxium reduction; 31 — 8 = 23 stall minimum requirement/24 stalls provided). I. Uniform Sian Program DRC2009-00697: The applicant submitted a draft Uniform Sign Program that will regulate the technical characteristics of the building and monument signs. This sign program was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Bumett) on August 17, 2010 (Exhibit P). In general, the proposed sign program complies with, and meets the intent of, the standards and guidelines set forth in the Sign Ordinance(in effect at the time of the review by the Committee) and Section 17.74 of the Development Code (as incorporated in the Development Code Update in September 2012), including the maximum number of signs per tenant, sign locations, wall sign construction/materials, and the basic dimensions of each wall sign, including sign area and text height: J. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction - as the proposal is to demolish an existing veterinary hospital of 3,068 square feet and construct a new veterinary hospital of 4,815 square feet with 895 square feet of retail space. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing 'in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. Respectfu,sysubmitted, Candy umett Planning anager CB:MS/ls Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Existing Site Plan Exhibit D - Demolition.Plan (Phases 1 and 2) Exhibit E Proposed Site Plan (following completion of both project phases) . Exhibit F - Floor Plans(Phases 1 and 2) Exhibit G - Roof Plans (Phases 1 and 2) Exhibit H - Building Elevations and Sections Exhibit I - Overall Site with Drive Aisle extending to Vacant, Adjacent Property Exhibit J - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit K - Landscape Plans Exhibit L - Photometric Plans H I i6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2008-00909, DRC2009-00360, DRC2009-00697 - NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ® ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 7 Exhibit M - Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheet Exhibit N - Design Review Committee Action Comments(August 17, 2010) Exhibit O - Design Review Committee Action Comments(April 19, 2011) Exhibit P - Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697 Exhibit Q - Discussion of Construction Phasing and Project/Business Operations Exhibit R - Pre-Application Workshop Minutes (March 12, 2008) Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2008-00909 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2009-00360 Draft Resolution of Approval for Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697 H. I.&R g G e G TACN$1_EM 6 _ pP �. d gEALES ST' cP - NA p\AHP KING RANCH RDS - .�:. i NDS LACOLI R SIMJMIE'DR g. a _ALMd..yy G s . OQ\ AMEADOWDOQDNT �' ALMOND Si l LARAM EDR s G- s� t. o _.- Q `ra• ALMDxD s w _ a. 1F1 < � I o AUAOxD ST _ALMOBD ST_-- CABILLEfl0DAm I ALMOND -ST - QQu.' SrOITrONO 5N-WEN ±;FA.R.M BELIA VISTA OR IL �,a g a HIDDEN fpflM fl0 WW% I - N B. -.H!DDEN.FARM.P� '` RER 4urtr' � -,04 - 1W 4 - SENDA AO, II SENDA CT �HIDDEN FARM RD _ ORATION _ $ `\ S CAPMPIBT Lli .CANMPI.ST -RD - - : v CARRARICT -� CARRARI�CT .. xwSNryJIG .Z _S.. '.:19CAR9 DR .� ST 'R�pNG IN. APPAL00$_A_•'� MWxrAIN y \-8 ARA D_A,. -, F - . . W!WHIRLAWAYCT Efl ODOR:; @ vwlglAyFAv__._ ...R RP�O'�- ._VISTA QROVE ! sNADYLAx� OU(Qfq WHIRIAWAY CT STANFOFID S WHIAUWAr ST w /V 1NV0�, VHIRLAWAY Si Z -- - 'c NMGG=dd-'A wok - RD CHERflY.LN Ul < �P�' £ a,CINCH RING LN 3.: �;I WDDIR'Y�E OR g1WfAEW PCANrON RD PAP _ of IN < CAMELLIA CT "�!� VM1fYVJ&ST-:._�DANLERDR � �BRAM6lEw000 ¢�' � o ba & I � _HILLSIDE-RD- � _q y' ILLSID DI. "1�ct cr � WIDE Mss �DR d HEI- �< _ y '. !i L_ DR - _ - - VIVIENOA ST HILLSID : a �aH VIA EL ai6DO c < FLYING MANE LN JAURANOP Ci - n _ _. x o EI a o .' 9 IhMlcxO ' R_CHARD ST _ _ 'D9ESDu RANDI!OW Si ERITAGE RaxcNpSr, A ¢I, RD .— f :;xExnwEll A.NoxAco PL IT rteBEF PEACH!REE N w' 3 PFAW D'PEACH 5 Dill, gp ! IOMOSA CT '.,m �EEGHWOLID Ofl ' lN mI .:: %-F, �aIFRFDIN3';(x G CA:. esouHE IW , �19EECHW001 �� MMUNITY' NY_F1 IN, APPLE LN 1; s OVOM BEEC WOOD DR - BE�GHW000 r Ir I�sk' IQ cII sroRK '... - �zIMMERMaxNA-NCHWILS( `Aw- a j pP tPNBDR 5. _ ILVIL_$�NAVE X "d j AyT °S I eN ' �NERMOSA VALSOx cry.. �N1L llAYf--_a—. I�Ar,coTrofiwoaowAv< > g' ; If 3 �I 1 �y C0'TCMW s'_ .4N R . DA ai �T e+ WAv SHPRDDR m.sMNIUNDA DP MRMANR DN >" '"Vm �A+OARGRO6E DRI NORIHflIOG MMowxr�n I' CHAFFEY CRI A �I JJ ..-_a EAILlIANTIN' _ GOLDEN_ I y ,rlcR l � °{ ` Qp MAN7At�ITA DR �1. MACMITA ITA OA )�' LAw<:uR iri. E BPi�. Y GOIOFNST ° 51 Iz GGLDEN$T.._ `S!' Gr �i FLOWER 6T Sr DR S;-I�!I'V'NITAOR -.:y! I tl 4i �Ii� COLLEGE N li �' ��l o � wV!ER 57 I 'PMDO �( - R it G Ic 1 I A l� S. 5 i' <IVVOGO CT 5. 6 -<- ,�, �suxilOWFR st , TWO. ._BaVRIPIPNE V9 _ i Cj/g HOR�LN �i WCAsf _ COCAST # 3 S A LL z o BANYAN St _$ 0 SHALE Bf - < m _ 10500 MFDOTCT LY I lit - <9GINty 10100 I BANYAN ST -� •P SAN I, 'DEDOMST . a J MANDARIN Avf i1s I �� IDMI,N AVE o _ z cv c3 .FaMIpAPN WNOMNAVE �. 1� 'AYE INIERTY^il �I 5 �ICARTAIAR I dIr F MM410 CA c I, �� >; UGLORA z .: i'UGIDRuI', IIIBERTr$iW I s c S' I ;E I E {DRi 67164 I o - soNsrDx� �' ALTA UDlMuOR .IIPrY I all yII y^) I1118!6GIMR z. SSI ';"JR,^_.l, AwE. _ �. � s I' �.. LOMA AVFl111T: AVE 5 ...- ILrrREs6Lr IDIy: _.— - U,' _ —�'__. g -....LEMONAVE i' S IL�ivE s^E'M1''__:LEMDIF.A�I_-__ ' ._.__ --.Fi. I.:IEMON AVE l VILLA _ ,.Q NA01 ._ ORANGE Si o 'ORANGE Si g� ORANGE Sr 'ORANGE ST. �'• H g, �' ,:ORAlIGE 57 .. Q.. BPI$TOL a p AA m 'E AVE SOMEIE7 Dfl o z = C ND GG-_wDNUAAFr.' L3 .. DA ': ,p VINEYARD I �I -� Ie MARBEl1A of zg ALTALOMADR '. '. -. - -_.'IbR I I t RMPM} ltJl i/ .M _ DR ALUIiOMA 0i bIGH1dNQ '.-_ :NuxEER DRERYLPARK y_tGHLgpIDAVE — —' — FwcBArT I� . IF=OAK 6I RXCN AVE IW.. - HNq AVE:, s• � ' ' ERGARDEN Si ldi '.i ' ST iMRFIUCT R''pST PSL k 'LNINGN DR�{� g3 - SILVER. �'. IE3q 4 H x'. p ARIA3l ST E3 -•_-- N -.. --Pi.' :1101- BU49NPoINfE ti �:.: '� Si 4 MM1NF11 yi Q� v4T�,+. CATHEDRAL CT '�". : $ AW ORK Si SAGE �- 5 I,.... 19TH PNIG 'AVE RING N SONORAAVE NAA,Ijc_R '6A11YOOD WY \ y rAYGLEwODOCT ''WorR N)6URXR m o G G Station"1$' NDRTHA ,O DR 99,, ,•, �.• ST t3J GALA AVE MODOC Si IRA HAMIITIN SI GALA' 'AVE ea4:o NED6EBOPI MAAILTG'1 ST ,¢ MIONONE1tF- >STX y'W C ON V tib ;, ICr •NUMIL-ON S'JASI MIGNONETTE Sr Mx,NONETIF sr / c1A y MIGNO`EriE sr %m COLOSA 1* a","` iloltr srsA MlcnDxErrtri �I6T %"NI? 'WOO6LFAf DR JONWI_Si Ip.�w�r 6i pp OLLYST'y P/'K'��/�/ !!T =GROFISIDER AVaL0x 6i MAx�EY•. & NOLIY HOLLY.ST� •X �Ei�CTBA aFaq,1.R' o PROJECT\V J E C SITE E EDIG DR W .o .�ST N GT 0 .IerHs nFAsAN v�Ew oRn _ 'VIMRIA D A% FAP `DDIENWR 7N MNAfnDR mioM .a - S TAUPE 64 y0MA5.FA AVALD s i '11111XGrOXR EAxNMErA� .�" GOLOFN YNIRpY tN ` 3 gF- ��..- .. ___ rmil WAN ._ VI$TA_.ST, -IASDNAR L40)LIACk ~ ! W <"� e,MONTE VISTAAST $ $ <:� a' •MOXIE v75rAsr YMOST g, MONIS WS*. mwRraJ vt - NlrroNar'•' UWI NMKIMIDR. MIND - CIELrtO SP r. Lrzulusl g WxE ST 1• ALTA t a 6 IL- .� - 1E �D.S iy6 Z U_ qua �� S'ST n ' k 3 G LA RDNOA � � [ g U VINE ST w U VINE ST ,/°"'""� •' LA VINE 57 (SLI - ' Sr UG ESr LOMA i' o �kEMNIe NR 7'• AA nIxL ST D�CARNELIAN CdJ '--�' .RMP At s <� GXvnw KNanM"DK /` t' �•. Z y LOMRA DR oylAtl _ n _. IV LDyt, - -. vdpKMAM �$ ..:'T� L RA DR _ :. .T1l ALTA G E-.wMIA 6°q 3 ... - A OP. -' �• 5 r'LOMFTA�1 LOMA U,MESA =_ iLtEu^A�, uMEY NR 4 t ..NN RAN( -¢tt RDBEPOB ST: '��LOMRAAL < g a}C;ROBERIYIST ] AdNA.E13. :iG. �i CENT -'Z - ROREROSST °O- LIO(I.S _PG FOODS m�woall o NNYMr s RD rprDa o,00 - a. osoo- BASE LINE':;_.FEr(is - .._ " _` E I�IN VIA LADEMa, PEPPER ST _ iPEPPER S< 6AAcsogryNS /u x11DMtlN NR 6tFNMl6 NN w ca �^^y VIA j DnxODD g� rtwlR[ MVS S�PNP �" R SLIBRAI1 a moN�vlOSoo sY : IRONvmoG 6T £m g 'L^t°q;(. PP '°tFkst DFI6,P3 } gg 3 9R1 .3 g€$ 1 S- ALDER:. � "°04 C ROYM - W. R IRo"Abs,1t i e'+ / N:° Vf .\a et z 'CALOMAC 5 ALDER 5 o SID�fl yS`� y� _ RIFly AWEN', F Y (LOE@Ci ,ml'urnL }w4•A1i $,�LIAs a_P 0.uu11 ELF axADAC _ DO sr- J gg L JJ �E $ HIL DILL PRADO 9 - 5' LO T L 0 ST S" --_ST 6T MNONOIM & �M YK/PI n 9xwKF k? RED cAltE F l] �� PAIDALroBr �'�PALO AL71IR � � AT 5 .. _ , :c A AAi eAssAc�< PARK eAsasT ` s ` i N"NCI W° p1911Y,., S- 11 r� I.. .. > G ��` ulusr g B wrtu"nNu c a< Oywye € '� r LL \qa i n DANDLEwOoo `? f tt DOHA Rb('i �` Fr `�. { G.' v�ANPOlw0OB6r OAP�UIEWQCO Efl a;Q 'Nb>n a. 1 y,'IQSr GLNOIFW'DOn QR 4 9 ST 1 a CUCAMONOA� 6• REsrAR d., 'cANo.. MERCEDWYEW rz ��. •' ,- Q •VALES , ;'BMADV 3' .�' Q' s oalMwR .- �. I G �MAxcRovE 'mem�AF.j RUTHI C"LI�E FEL/Z. // A 1. a 3.':cr (,: sYEW Si `r ¢ a g, Ak �kEw st �. 3., xvlMEc .` .. MUSSER�I .w> �'?S ��VISTA �HDRCH >ST 8'�° Q DHl1RCH ST-_ t °C ,' s $ s I s \ `�. i r,W NR ANNro V? - LWGSIOM S[ � — _ ,� '' SP VTAHOEPIE. �' \X90 _ m ST ;< vyNGSTFx -5<'uxG6raR RRApEADr xMAANaR 'f� ,. AVE "= m 6 - \ LO 5 ai HEMLOK ST H9.00N FEIRWND. XEMLOCN 6i Ham.04 SIT CARE SUR NIA \\ *' ,^ �+n �. BIRCH IT :k r ��. I_. i, HPILICK " •'.n,1. !AVNRa Cf` ASHFORD '��Sr K(Y S'PER6IMMON k Urv'-'�+ Y hM4E pi,. \ € �r d1uNn.. e O• Qe N96dx? a'er. :NDRRDI' .5T - 'bA l� RS" I-ri' TRttNl6i._ '4cIX01"Yx 6T' Y� - "l p '1 AOA \ _ lRrox Si RNgyton<"`•-!" EFFEN ST 5 \ kDCIADANAr \ b s TEEN ST 'Nx°M"w n.- d,EFFEN ST = S *� LdAATOx I :.rasmmetahowl DR 1r IRw,Vmn.- �, - -I uNew.a NtosRDORSETST m '/ NO RD g C6 RAL SIS_. cwpM ISTAFFORDST REGIS CT I TERRA VISTA •� ' y- Station z'3 6 TOWN CENTER 0E57=ACI ST y.ESTACIA CT- ��uatA�� HISTORIC , .FOOTHILL_@ ._ - - - `gJ EXHIBIT A - TIMBERLINE LN .. - _ _.- _ _ ..-.. COURT OV/FEH LN HAMPSHIRE ST _ -N� NVAP6XIRE 6T SOUSE c�LAVRELST _ I �EAwr� �NPH.�� �" - I CITY II '--' � - - • • - � ' 11 : 11 . 1 ' uar rt lih - dt l e dft ZAP 41 i !f 5 _ -- a neueo .o,n.e — avow 3NI.1 _35VG Knfl•iA nnn...-nn W V na, .�.1 • .,wol.r.»iacnrll aoaln 1 mmLcu a..,l —.—— ' .ul+s.um I Ilaln.l..I.aa Q I I 'moi -m 0 0 'ti��)t�.�.:_.!'• I �� I mnm VT.lmr-� 1p F7 'F �" ';•;:?•� ,;.fie,I I I vMay..rn nnnuuu.w—� 1 .I ��j fuvl,r,,a'aL,n,Hwvf :o'<ilii ei I m I ;I.Y° K 3311 / qr nY b, s I x y�rY,\N�IY.I lIN i IJ.rava oN8D37 C 0^,.,'7 nn..r. .. �...mn .•aHm.M,nl-f„ul-„a,al IU �•a 1 , (� RRRfff••. < i*LTb;'.m"'li 1 lfl�nflf�lY,l)1LtiYl;w� A`\ � � � sA� � ,ate—.au _ __ I !Ci � n^I!•niY111M.1mlm Ul,..w°l 1'�Tl;�nrnn, y iJAf.IVai ��� ��-1 n'L'gS iWn WI.S I nl.lari Ml nVM.In1 Wlll.L,f,M nl � 1 aNa, u.� 1 IIS+I MIV."Y.IA.a, bil UtlAlml Yaw h�,fll 1 I I•IV14UM'bw ' . SY �bOr to bn.�l�ml.'nw iiovn"f?VUIl.In1Jl..lVm.rlf U.L'Yb �e5 z iajava �tl G 1.1'IaLll'N'�Y11 �"ti• I l nU n.v ;nv,a,nV c 13JaYa _ 1 6,�', �vt��• ATU.KaON-MJU IIL TIIOI l,llnfi, �Ilj� �__•$b V•t..i I IU,LTIII:uaIN'1 i',W'LLL'LfNn`fl'`nl N � aflli.aW Q ml m�' 1 f n.1,.lU 1siMI I.,M uU A waw mwN YI' AI:.IdafY.DtYm,9.>3!.vi'MYN fn.,nl.l SIMS]OIMD n",rollYlln\] I I .n�Anl bLi„"l.lrl.Dth ln.11LlnAl n.lf.",.....,. ��,�".ryl�....n, I 1 fTu,Ln l'awb. ' I ..mlb¢VF.anamV',IpY naLV\bYl bIW L.V 1 ,AIb iN,MA ll0c.'LL,' U"vinw.salll "Y AN3w8.LV.LS S.; x W PIFOO i %{ i f/ _ vo 1 ZZY �j///mp // 0. ................ 7, E r REVISION E)USTnmw ONE I STORY BUIL a 71 V METAL FENCE WOOD FENCE .'too PARKING uj Lu C. PARKING U) '100— rruw 'CL FENCE vIr j f ko EXISTING ONE STORY BUILDING I GRASS 31. DEMOLITION PLAN FOR PHASE 11 LEGEND 12 L_ OEMOUTION BOUNDARIES 12 VaCLUDWOMADMS N89*58*10'E --------------------- cONSTRUCTIONcK4dNLINK FENCE NOTES: •ALL SITE WORK.STREET WIDENING AND ADA CURB ACCESS AT BASE LINE WILL BEPART OF THE DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE IL :00 C .1 •ALLEXISTING FENCES AT BASE LINE AND AMYTHEST 1100 STREE WILL BE DEMOUSHED VWH PHASE 0 :7 VEWAY ce i. R WILL SEE PHASE 11 •NEW SITE ACCESS i DRI FROM AMYTHEST STREET BASE LINE NE DRC2008-00909 AD-2 8 m E FAMILY_ ---------------------------------------X � l' _ _____ Lorrso 'ac I�r�r�l.ra-- :f L rn '^ ���i`^..—,1`,..P�`I'.t':k•,,.:.-• .�.;.iiEiArIass7;..6a'::a—,no"iG.'�/�'//��.,i�; , _Toll _ ___ _ _ 1102109 TO REMAIN 4128109 Pool 7120109 CAR SPACE liflolog ............. 9428119 7,2Gj09 ,0_9 -- -----------------/--------- ---------/* w LOTH 10 lioME%- fi 1,N-E-8-3 FUTURE DRIVEWAY, i AT ADJACENT PROPERTY LU Lu 2 SITE f4LAq I!!" fo SP =A V LUKIKMINPE�_ VAN SPACE VACA .NT PROPERTY 0202-161-09 PMgNP�sp-Fs. LOvAlunT 5 P­TDID 2 PAR"G sPAC". go Kt­SAME S.A[LS + LF 0 ANDAWTHYST`STS ON�LL ME ❑ 1 K-1 ❑ ❑ ❑ LOT NET AREA AUm son. 3v W-LOMS AREA wrT. PARNNG LOT AREA ---------------------------------- t.zz. �UST. 21 -1 DVI.AIE& TOTAL 1AW15CAPE TA rl wa r.i195O.F 1. nWwA -- --—--———--— -——— v". SMT, 1. m� sul o LOT x1O A6s­$oe3P­l0202-16l-l0_O.OW LOT 011 Aucssaespa,,dO202.161.11 -0.000 MONUMENT LOT920 A-Ie-Wsl`e 810202.161.204M SIGN '<~1•=BASE LINE ROAD _pf ------ ORC2008-00909 A-1 m 00 REM 510N 1102/09 4128M 7120109 SKIN 'M2109 4 W.9 '2 7.Mq t"oq 00.FLINtTV zr=r--- V 10109 — — — — — — —H22F 1:E&rM.- ?�ELRALITRk.—jea El F-1 X 9 - BICYCLE O i R�S P-. P� 4a X R., Cr Cp I1,"A 243"A rf-Li T4qA J-1 p—I Rt o 11 '://i!,;'�/%j'//'/'�'/.i` , /.''��'//�;:/%!.j%/',j, ,///'�/'ji//,/�/;/%ij//% -bftv A- 7777 -v 14.q.,ft R— Ro u1s. um.�. R— I4$.QA R— Rb. 173 ..qA L 7 P7 EXIST.ANIMAL HOSPITAL BLDG.TO BE DEMOLISHED IN PHASE ir -pl — D —3, V /'/,'' % i�,'/� /. ///// /// all //'/ �/%%� ! .':'��, /,"�:i/// ffi PHASE I FLOOR PLAN W16—V Nf NE ORC2008-00909. A-3 1102109 #28M 7120/09 11110109 ElD.S ROOFLWE rtp. - 99oF_LIYE ji ewyuE BE UMa. IB6ea Jamar _l I Fb, E T. Ban x�' Mlql' R— catcall.. E_ IIt WR 243 NA yl 7- 3 ETM MORE gI Bob W& 1W ENTRANCE R— IMB, cis W.R 5"KR GO A 1. ..kv� J, 525.ak QO d 17 cl -0 74 OI cD� P_ &C_ ow. 'U.4A 172"A E T. ------ u nn A L A ❑ ❑ -------- ro TO 1 -0 --iffac— AL__ PHASE_L��LqpR PLAN NE NE DRC2008_00909LA-4 RE VISION 1102109 4!28109 7120/09 11110109 --- ' --- r- r .s - r — — _— — A Lai L J L J L J - - --- , I -~ I NOOi SLOPES I � — J r .S � 17:5 TVP. A J I RODE Y 5 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,� 1 1 p 17:37YP k �. 71'4' o,roA W ? I _ ' a r — — — — — — J . f Nv�c J flv�c I omI,t0 - - ---I IIEZZ M I STA" pg S v1 I eELLgy T LAUIMN ARU i FLAT ROOF H.RfDGE I ii I+ O Cn - TI'd' j FLAT ROOFI 7�- - - - - - -' - / L - I � _ I 3i .RooF coves I g c= I �r 17:5 tYP.' I I p R0 c�3 ' r 1 Roof SIOPEs J L _ v:s iYP. ! u, 1 f L .S 0. 17:3 TYP. HOOFS S 13 , S L J 8 A rs• I ���i MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN I rill MH NL NI NE A-5 ORC2008-00909 u m • • • ov 11/70/09 J-1 — i :I - --- - - - - - N - - - -- - -- � 1t s Trr.� � I � ucs rvv s � / I FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF 3: /7: In12 FLAT ROOF LISANIMAL HOSPITAL TO BE DEMOLISHED D IN PHASE Ra�FSL •%�%' '%/ /,,•/,.j////� —_ _ — a, — u iia an ROOF PLAN PHASE I 16 MIA, Ni NE 1-11 w NL DRC2008-00909 RE..VISION 1102/09 4!28109 1/20/09 11/10109 OW DS _ — — — — — — — — — — .— ROOF SLOPES f 0 b TY .FLAT ROOF --- � J 4 FL Nvnc Nv+tc I ro! � I I MAC I I J FLATROOF —y I 0 11:6 TVP. ROOF SLOPES � _ FLAT ROOF �— — — —I, aoaF st�Es— I + ` ,�I �� �% aoaPxDPEs I s Sia -} 1 .S I. L -- �`— R 1� 7. '}_ L J l_ J L J , 4 r ' r r i O ROOF PLAN PHASE 11 B 1 N07E. s } T �awa J cw..n-unw.+nw,nmvns Yg$$ R ,n ' �p�! ^° I uwnt�iE�winFwo.sint.si r�ieKe,�a �. P x00F1� su 3118'•V Nt NF NE DRC2008-00909 A-6 rn • • • 00 —REVISION sn0M — _ anaro9 7120109 cam•, © � e ® cp o m � �� `' ,i NORTH ELEVATION •• FMlMfNO W EEA14 SpCM�EOIRE . taxa,�•.++w�.cmx .um YFy1 HIS I 0 000 00 0 •,o�a1MNf`•i'��a' EAST ELEVATION 3118..,. NE �^ NE O NE L � V DRC2008-00909 A-9.1 0 V a m■ a Ifll� —■ — ■ — - _ a a tti II - III IIII — I - I I III• I II"1111111 I� III II h I VIII I - - I IIIIIIIII __ 111111 II _ IIIIIII I I --- --- IIII _ IIII IIIIIII� _ 1111111 i _ IIID - — ort -- NORTHsom mpg" • I I _■ ■ ■__110000 RTG.� _ DETAILFAST ELEVA71ON p ELEV.DETAIL-A- PAR ELEV. I -- -- � ; �,�:nllllll���• _ = = = 11111 �• •,_�� � ": ullu uml IIII��IIIIIII ull, n Ilill,llll �Illlq :1��1. 111111 IIIII --_ i.,.c• ��mulllll I• - — un.11unulli'" IIII 16. I -� — miilluu I IIII .L•.:•........ uw �'� � nnlul II I I III 11� uuhu 1111111 _ 111 111111 I I III _ 1- I• 1- - - I i �• I I RE VISION 8@0lOa '. 02128109 ., 7!20109 p o0 000 I p pp ; � IO or ' SOUTH ELEVATION ar, td r j (BASE LINE ROAD ELEVATION) ; e 2 ssauws.eNwrtn�.o,eNa.u.e . N d 8i � �: S ® �, '�: �iIla a ®p irK O O i x — — p �rN lR N Ebsmg Sin& i< Fam9y ResUmice WEST ELEVATION _"�'• (AMETHYST STREET ELEVATM W/S.F.R) ' 31f 8'•t NC NC NC 2 o U DRC200840909 A•M rns LL ti/20108 4/28/09 720109 A MEZZANINE FLOOR CLINIC FLOOR SECTION A-A SECTION 6-B s Vol Lo VAC UNI AC UNI ou VAC UNI MEZZANINE FLOOR RETAIL SHOP CLINIC FLOORCLINIC FLOOR ' -iS lit Id SECTION C CENTMOMRW NF A-7 Ni ORC2008-00909 17L V",I It, ""0'09 man ------------N�-------------------- ;;;Ra ---1 P --------------------------- FUTURE DRrVEWAY ---m_------ -------------- VACAKT PROPERTY A..... r�j F-1 I ........ a Ell ................. ------------------- --- -- EXIST.ACCESS YYY (DRNEWA I ----------------) BASE LINE ROAD IL EASTERN SITE ACCESS PLAN 2!L ni NI NE z DRC200840909 A-2 x tp r I 4 CL FENCE b xm n � a ,.IrO A -warm.rLacb w sr'iv 4 N rxsy I scl-eui —I—sltwearnaG-o�,r s I tupaDAW Sa)Q As ro n o r u.I...y oleo ern.°wrn 1 I v1 I cr Sd�H r �xyt i .` .cT I ,��, t�ty� cr r77• o--�aa•)a•ara-elrlary wruw,r SOIrYr R an/n I� I I S � r I a `SI I" A ©-yxaa�eurrar Per aen-+.I�en.onR on fn wr f.�'l.ir, I wS I tel_- �.•ne•.Ia e•'r ° ��� I��' fy (I�earael a•aaorK aw Barn/•.•ao.nt•rn l•aae srq 111 I I �Imo. �` �• ,... _,: -pIP►--�-_,-_-..._�_._...__.....__..,..,_...._.; .......__ �I' 'J ���+++ �-ea•w.errm tlV RQga rral ar � I I i' '. .;7 .!r / : yi,-.�j � ._--fr3iFR..:-.- _._......f_..__-_--- ._:::J O�� C�Na>ZA'rNLIV•altifiallWYiR<fLl r-roan (I� I I I 7 il�ji , ° /•ecru ��/•rK,•ra�---^ V �a/r/rCrJtinarK aPIO Ra'a D'rttlp /I I l i. � � xm A y—D/r/rCI l•/OrylprK,rlrr R arAa T sros U ��i . �, J• � I ' yl �„� o-aaancr u,w arDrr nlD,rlfIR O([a D•aYru V •1 . 0-me'[s<r r lo.a°or wu a afcK tr.ncrr I (IJ�i•�1 'I • d�' ' �� �� (�+��y I oz -(ApI�CfeIDlI-aa'sA4wa®rrar�/e[1ar/4I•C aDrMeralaepvrlrdKrORerrl�AlRgRrla/CmfIba<aKI ralaaaltmDl uIrar/mcrcl I �'• ��� bl r' ! ` lJ \ J I a•s x(77 LI� '- W IDDC I $ AOalir L. p�� gaDm rOnYrKMKD raaK dc/laQ-Pym Pool (� 1' ° PA 11 P.A •'0'C¢ M , / 0 Gl I I 0 C/ 1 Zvi I■■7! aOprK(I egagrr aYlna a'eM/IL'ar Aa°/6r `�� %P.7 ° IA R" x IF7n / �n\'• = o-llarD®Ar rlaavlrAmr nlaalKlarcmwnl[Ar � .:' AIaYt®ar QrL LD/IlC/al Alp �I I I -�� Np a1W K r01[ZT r/ I/All•/I�t altCM a!b W K q -0�-.�' /.I �� /A — II I.Ago Q3-�aeK A csllvro sar./r urc.svu/.rlav[ ��,lanna �q �� •hh ' . �� y�" - l1�aSla....c.m.)A4[ `�A01Lfm/'Sdrar R On SIA I/AY rral rOWIK,O/L _� O .{� al � �� xy Q NIf � V rr nor � r I o"!r I npn7/ro rASII aat a � �"0"r .el.r�wryrn aAl ac Por ru•Iraw[ I Ia A/va IaAll rn �II� xm rr Q Y.1 N sou svA°�Ir,Drlc as mr•/IKIccKrr aw W f I ^1 8 �i I w txar�r') V v7 8"'[lUri MKIr1 A t ,W aepKaKl � r atior xamKrm ritwrA�Or"rlrirmwv SII 'I PROPWEDBLDG. 'o- �aaca r•r ratl�/raWonR on fn wArr l F.f/l7,/..ff 1 I_-�4) s\=3Ag) PAD=/374.05 ADm sEr»lavf see 9LFE cJ I ; I I .�+� I $ rti-Alc• 1 BENCH MARK I 1 I I r.K s/K atiaP veem ASA W OrDAIM'Iq r6 a/W h ( 'I 1 I 1 � el � •Pray eurr).tea I I � � � xm II `^�' � .I 1 I 1 [ � ' a! ^� $s •�•n�c•r giro° ay � 3ygT n � J'rr C!'YENI NYrrAR u= 1 1 J7 — ——— IJ1J BAd lIl[ 7-/.MDI.BWS CTJ/rl tIJ,er I h ♦ Jy,�y a raraall' < (line -LIIL r ftp I {pr.1 4 N A pp —/.or-o•oc arlaess ;.IOIK 1 �` S rrPaeo' _- --"_'_'- MI ro•rlcraar '\ x b a J an— 1 Ares• Kr rrMOs Al!rE altleYr r"L1YK Bt0[A IWI'Y- CC Ir `\ u — — — ry — — — 5 �0 wrs G6mrm syn -'✓- tr"" � � ,,,R �c ewP,.-uea_ �rnrrA:awr (j777 llSrti I,I _ e.4`` _ ... � PP SEPI , FL itisT, 6500• I.C. i n 6AR e)2Nl C \ 17'DEDICA IION to Me • rt _ a I n ? • I �l� CYtY OF RANCHO CYA:AYQVGA X10 � K.H. �'. ——————(1'G)——— ——————fie•CI—— ——— eaale scat o CGW 7ROG POLY! __---- 6' RICH BLOCK WALL � sr r ••°• �ECE=IJ72. (?I'r) niO106 SI' ('•''h r)•'rI .0 Star F1 BA SE LINE _N895B'!07 C 2 rasoouo■ur°'Asarc L sramuar n sa PI~aloatm aulunur Pic On or�wlwr� 1� lnss a CA/QAf M ZI— \��arpao -rauOw wnorvur I ' a ma A1»s•r aoa wa IJBp nArsa>ta asxr a aO aeaasm Orsi \ 1-mom�IDMRAIf A7Y; s�wlsC� J MINO[ AOG o18EaTIMMr IrIF J I w asr1L11 allw C a•am /J711 carr.ar.N.10 lmv "arra aeour AEOXONCM m I.lsO A A rim •ass scaler.w• s'MAX VERTICAL CUT AT PROPERTY LINE 'A ,aa sore,._w PA s'gwe�nlrgas rr � >Q arra saru '.I salrr ar ' ao alrr r SUNnvuom r a am tlu rJAO IMF - rra i Man=Omar eac Map Mmmo awr I IBO F.F IaLA lo.ulm sow aQ s as, [asa oaasn� =co=rm ross.iu weo anew umr nlmnvO me wa.in anOrr aww o�Oii i lm�Aw smw r aeaa:�ra swue+ur awv �————— >maus•amvc sv sweOrar a.w - C7 }� .NAPIIc OnnAsrwrcnr p p >Q alfra/�lU1l s10d� M Amc,rC auto . �c 17 17 wr aaw 2 @ af•.,� fs,m tT l♦lpCA1nY IO OE P~aIOV�Aram?nAm ~ our or maim CLcum a rolemwroO/ , 88 �w�olwiw ti . L.—mrroswaanitr i Ch I ss ma.`°sr RMIm smtowfin-amcghm rim a, s.e�o, a a wwE ,Jso �,e rsraas V JTU OVEREXCAVATION DETAIL -1-13)U], .I��.r • ' __ _______ ——' —— �mus OeOlo 1370 Ili wwasm was rut wso/oa+aaD rmr �MwaA at1:acomrocrnor cPr W a.. awatm c Oro sscrsr �aseAr avrc s¢srceaa•n.r - �arra ra[w C.1 N rola msol�amsr O1 I W smw gqw mn aw C C ullo law rue I•..rr .or sous:r•.b reeot®s•r soar aua =saw u=ors to mW P/l .. alarm 1•awl/_ 11 l c, avArF / "\ ,< 1 IJBO reeon®aur - ii ori n s¢r�•....,w. /' ^- ` ,.• iocw n �mrra aaatn rJm arR s rso.wwar. ` cr esaur c, sxwc lim alnwAVIE. i lJ7V O rwr-r::war ams save.•.p• coo g asJ7 ��. +m:�ow.rv..rer • ar r.v..e•r•r rar=e M"I•.wT ...s•rn..c s�..rw muga rc ma rwrau ra.o• .•r•ss rw y .�Q¢`m2� sew:°n rtt a � � wee r car 'z, a' r.Ra+sr.r,.��. nss ralY sn-rw 1• �a• � QO rl• a yt�h�?M�(Y F'� � �raura w ®mer •c..auuw — •.: u.s aa.c vwcarc ..1.f .KaAP! aaKrR.b •Df am 4sn rsw p ;A .¢e•nr r.0 a¢qK Im.l < • uP.wr .vsmarr I.C. .wr lmrs..o rm.ata�a r' w r 'mfr rrauorr or:a•r .K•1 w¢um•¢=anon -ULr -!&Me a K.H. +vr.sr..arwaa<xr ••'•='' wasa71c7iR /—wnw ww � =Arun MR S at'a6 Mom alowls SRa F'IDI 6 gram F RULM s aim wn:i w a�•r sna.rm c°�'im�t irm coe .am ro¢.cn. ti .:. ra6arM[mrncas 1�•10• wsmi a m.r iewavr•�"e.p�: m a i�w r<m arravrm,mi wro aws ae •i naww u°0�°i we r Wv srs9s rap'arr<er Win•-�n. .�r�a,•ar aw.rc iiirS'icn"uiiiO1 r` ryn n.r n y�.aew r ours raw u O•ss syn .040109 01 00 ra-.w i ran naur rwmc rM sous,ar 0401 Ow BROOK 24' X 24" CATCH BASIN BROOKS 12" X 12" CATCH BASIN��, STORM DRAIN CLEANOUT��\,w SME L w sc. CONC. PAVING DETAIL 9" X 9" AREA DRAIN w ut O !� scut RO sc \V� s<rr � C3 Aa PAr Np WASTEw►ar SET SANDBAGS 4'Ey FENCE oournG�H�w roura�ns I e TW 0 W TW I G F N ., / a A 57EiQr1 MAd Mt£r AI17/ErRw AS AER.g-ro I or Rro/E['/KW MEL --�- ---- r---- ---��- \^off- .a1BW ---��_Ne9 Stl'IOY AS '�MS-to riKlel4.MD YAnIrfNMfae OC'-S1A91/IID CUVS/1WC7MV FA..'iEIIl EN/RAnfC{jgg7 I _rsy A �i� 11 B7 nry ax' O— SOL 5/OOY!"AMNAOENpYr AS FM I W-A Lam/---W WPM OMMM/s/oeAI AS AER rr_r O- 1f -I--EnsnP�dc-- s SUMAC BARREN AER SC-e `1 g a17SR]Pr eVlCYYS 074 I Go-- {I I ).ss f.F) . - I )ua rs Snawr SIIP I (IJ7 -- oro ti 57EE}1W^AAD vACLf.YyQ AS AD7 SL'-7 I � � I u II< rz JJ q7' i I ) WA 3 g au rs "nm r. n 811OlNI IMAT@I POLLUIIpI P(rtllBillgl NOiEb I 'gin r A7rACYpyE1V!A M7/E5 I (uns I o c f=7( , n 2 veil.a ha'•.xmi ^I I 9'h I pl .b.�it 1 s ,1 IV II; J �.~;., :. I VI s Pfaw � I �- 1 azza . / 1 I NO Meru SPS+nr Wal wb ay�u :n a ( UI CrR > •7 r / ,� '.. •1 pl I ;�ra�wH-r.,y°,'"°'.",,,r°be'�•; I I •J I x �� •. m ro... .ar.0 a>rP.arf.R mul N I I / o c �/ r ,� INC I �^�� 1 J ,A s � V l yr AA A' cr I 7 ti � ■�� SiOi.-nts ��IeI rv4 !!!q.RxKiOr•aPri I a rrarR N I' P.A PAo Doi . cr Q a r w 1 P. I _ P 4 e P. „., Pe Qp r IPq,R,..rn Paraa,e RPq a a.lwp a n e �- A-r I` rofx.b aYaRA/M e w ro whet nava. I 1 h Imo' OS/ IS !S '� ,.yl rt hSf Ntl ar 7 v v � .a I e y 1 rs SET SAN TLF®r- yq (C1- SaaalaD rxE- Q I I pl• TWO ROW TWO H I G (cJ- IlroRr-.ac r.n. xsl- ¢x Iu.Yxnflo.w.cnas h PROPOSEDBLDG. Etl- soE ENaRi YSP- a[MRRND 6[RxxarS [!s- slxA.ra KJ- rG Na Ell' I I Q I`�� FF-1374.55 y _moi [cl- aort11[[s A x.ts KR- ual axNc1O1/a4alrRq I PAD=1371.OS [cu-RaRxrxnxNr :/- PDIRRI[rl[xARlaatxr I t oar L- I[Np[No[aWNI atAxrc E ro' mBlblN7_SUi(81 arlRn Kx- Ilea[A11D[a.xRNi 11[R�I. KI0.Ilnn1 Rro Ell'xlr[xwn I I n i Sfp• 41- at nrn K11-qC DwNR1c 97- 4011[x1 �t9 Bn xst7-C4rn[rt arRIC _ pp 4J- 4oNNI IxxP Kls- FKk 4R- DIY 45- Ifix xalf 1 1 I I 4l- ouyf ew as N YP- fr[EI fACIPrL xx0 vfaNRrlO Mcn xAx.nu.r - - N I I . •�'. _ Ye- sRlrrlc aNralEx - 'K..waster ArR slaua ,•_�_ 4[x, sxu.ul[BMBER moi- xN[aN u4 AxR rasr. i r a I .�'Y�E-'`o-___-��_L•._'c�^'� - YID-fiaxl pNl Nfi PROI[CRaI r1- fNPRI[NANxa1llll �I I ,r 1 I ,,• I® ✓a E�a�� !Y-[9plA-la1Bg rs- 90.p gsrt YNaO(x[xl \�P- -7J7 --- - - �xlalp[o a IJnF 7 lrsr lr[ )- cg1x1.40Dx Sfr rNNal(NI 11 J� aSa'- — �lILS_�—_ _dIft1L59Sn=y lOeYN1 IRa1xr•OaIL+ - ftx9[IP(D CdfiRKllar[NfRANa!al wAs- aNsON[M4/4.RPSx4 MYNuYCarltMl .., SR .1 I I �l `1 h re (.1 PRC ,fsCll Af1a�ERM1 _— rJ,7 — z fC!- 41.91r][D CCrI5Ir1Cilal YMOrRR to nl !- [RIRAxC[/pxe[1 DR[xaYl 11p ' \I aie' .f __ 1.,-PM Il..l I O 0U rzYR 4 ell ___ IJ1O HO p "u CAICRI[IASN I -� --- R ` - • „ ' 8h 154�i W —c ;- m ----- --- - pp Aj --- — 7EN[aw I ,lE1n / - - ----- - --- -- osao• tit 7 BRCS NNxI I 77'OELYCA/IAY!O I n C p Cry Or RANOVD CA - CATCH BASIN N.7.S. I L Lao 77..51'- _BASE LINE _NB95B,O E C 4 � � --.�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� �""I � QQ�QQ'Q�Q a � i7A Til � �i ij fpr ► INlMIia �Illlilll! Illlfiill� y .moo ■����������■��M1� �� ®: 1.- 1�I �vLJA�►ill i I OQ ,000.... t� �►��1'i�► ,. O � � �•i i=_�� ��5.=,�,.�.- -_•. '•i i1 i�iti�ii��i�•�ii•-i p•Z - i•ijijiQi•i•"�" •'-Oj I � � � �•���•�.�•••.•:1.•• �•�• •1111.1 ..f..•�• ••_••���•• _ . ••. ( d'O'O'O'd O d O¢O.O'd O•d-ti���'O�Qi Will OVA -32101 PEPPERTREE BEND • ®® 11 ki lei U • WWII T,lei • r • :,. — :41::=G`:6•.." /S. --— t__� _ _ — _ _ — -•.emia_rr°.v v�a-wf.a w 9.. T_ EroMeBLDG. 11Y45 fL . TO REIMW G Lu ' � �/•..;-"^;^;'`,;,.. 1 '•+wo w..s ro re., �v e, arm l� �� �����/ >3/��Q� WbO b.rr.q i6� r ••O brrJJ4}N 1 -�__•l_.1��_.-. :_____— --_-- � 1 J .—_ _— __ _ 9 ��- •.saw _b¢nr v�• }� � — —_ — ...:_—,—_--_ —_ — my 9.o•.aJe rn y, � _ r.,.or rn ;•i .wuo ova r.w .1• wvu,.- a,n�p W 10 W J. _ Ro Nr JI 1 b. ..,...,,..•J b,rYbrN,Nr....,�.. .a. -b •� — alter...---— ------ --'.-.i-�------- ereJa].wJJ•„ ..,.., n Je BASE LINE RO Y•!LL Jbtlrap Yree,ie ]eta anamra.n arr.l]= SVu=.hfvJe�a.[,YNJD ia.J}l}fie])1l rea]Pio.Y.r. PROJECT: DEVELOPER; DRAWWO TITLE ALTA LOMA ANIMAL 7271 AMETHYST STREET MR.&MRS.NASRE CONCEPTUAL: CENTER 32101 PEPPERTREE BEND r Sr]EEIJu)e]ER r RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA sAN�uANCAPisrRANo, LANDSCAPE DESIGN J� 1 CA.92675(949 089.3122 L-2 - `:;,, —IIT 111 I.1. ._11' IL--I - ' IIIA I-I Ulf Ili I10f -UP DETAIL TENCHING DETAIL (;Al' VALVE CONTROL VALVE Nt =Lj IT � 1 �y, O •.i1 LIIOOTynty -- gqwQUICK COUPLER --- - 4 BACKFLOW PREVEN1Ek---- CONTROLLER-- - - `Fitl I PLANTING -- - •.,tut-:e:•se adawYe IF C;fR(.)UNDL'OVER PLANTING TREE_`',TAKING •"'�"Sz fu.3 325 5S PROJECT: DEVELOPER: DRAWM TITLE c ua.os ALTA LOMA ANIMAL 7271 AMETHYST STREET MR,&MRS.NASRE DETAIL SHEET 32101 PEPPERTREE BEND ,,, k CENTERRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA.92675(949)09-3122 L-3 CONCRETE-CRE F"M _T Wim:0- '7 le o CONCgotta 0) WEST ELEvATio SECTION D-D C) (o F PLAN 0.) ko w In L-a-fi-n IT C) WAIT 7W. I'ANTUNG LOT mi ASHiNL I FA— Trash Ar"a 0) 200 Sq. — Zt ft. - . L D 0 D D (0L.. SOUTH ELEVATION Im to EAST ELEVATION 20 51APE SPACE IN IN TRASH ENCLOSURE --- (D DECORATIVE PAVINGPLAN 12'h.C—R-0L MONUMENT SIGN: 0 gil Warm.TYP. m - MDI!.19'DEEP 16 I-THE PLASTERS WILL BE COVERED WITH RIVERROCN NFERSONIATCHEIE-TIONS. F -ZTALL. 2.ME SLAB BETWEEN THE I�PILASTER.-LL.1. MA ANWAL NOS AL LETTERING SMOOTH FINISH CONCRETE aAa,GAA,COLOR)W17H 6 OIHS46[!r SURFACE MOUMEDLETIERSFOR THE ANCHOR STORE NAPE.-EAIERNAL ILULANAITON. I---- .--. -- -- .UPEN D -f 3�INE LL11ERS FOR IHhANC..R BE,.TWO .:71L LINES NPUI.AND SURFACE MOUNTED. ♦THE I ET TERS FOR ME RETAIL STORE MIL BE ON ONE UNE. MONUMENT ELEVATION SEC.0-D S-NCE WK)UNTED-1'7".%IX H.LETMRS. a 5--LErrERSMILWRF.0PLA ASSLTCM. UETTERINGOB T MM ME SAW U^TFRW- SIDCS fW 7.FILL THE REVEEL MTN YELLOW FLUORESCENT COLOR MATERIAL.B_ALL KExWLASS UET'ERINU USED FOR THIS PROLE CT ML, : E OF A 14"INIUM 11 ,r M,--C--MU.BE R--191. MONUMENT D 5-CONCRETE UOUTTING AT THE TOP OFTHE PLASTER TONAVE THE HATU PAL COLOR OF CONCRETE jURAv COLOR) (SEE SIGNAGE DOCUMENTS) NE MONUMENT SIGN PLAN C,/ ROOF RAIN DETAIL Tp. A-10 m x ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY X vI,!lI IN N T.BUD ® TORE 745. I r LIGHTING LEGEND: ljx(;o0ltqr-GU-021 ICU BY:Nightscaping Radite -RD-0302 BY:Nightscaping t-u Lu 24 Wa GU-0508 BY:Nighiscaping co) JOG F�gLrkjna Lot Lighting f!x"16 ft.high U) BY:Evedast-ESB-EC-25OW > +W- Ro BICYCLE LIGHTING NOTES; 0 LIGHTING CONTROLLER T08E BY NIGKTSUAPING SS-10001N. • PARKING I OT LIGHTING WILL BE ON P1407o CEI LIGHTING CONTROL 47TH A TIMER. 13 • LANDSCAPE LIGHTING SYSTEM TO BE ENERGIZED AND SHUT OFF BY TIME CLOCK I 0 IN ADDITION TO A MAIMIJAL OVER AIDE SWITCH SMALL BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM. 0 • USE.10 WIRE ON 120 VSYSTEM AND IT SMALL BE HOUSED IN t,2-OR 14-SCH, L) 89 PVC BURIED lir BELOW GRADE.USE 2 012 ON 12Y SYSTEM. • LIMTINt;FIXTURES SHALL BE PLACED SUBSEQUENT TO PLANTING.LAMPING SHALL BE COMPLETED UPON COMPLETION OF INSTALLATION OF PLANT MATERIAL BY THE rw LANDSCAPE CONTRACIOR-JANDSCAPE ARCHITLCT WILL ISSUE ACLRTIFICAIE UPON COMPLETION OF LANDSCAPE LIGHTING WORK PER DESIGN DOCUMENTS 1> J. --------- ------------------- V. 06 1.1 10611,14 SITE LIGHTING PLAN %"11.,-10' BASE LINE ROAD DR 2008-00 9 L-4 • Sl 6 Chris�e �o�ouS -ibZq MUrfi(�h � P1 . Caoa) g4 -f45q 1 S A R 91 •l9o�c�� S �o� $ 1 S l �l '9 � 7 TI's cvn �b �+ Olge Avg o6or o qAqvi - till WAKO(A FAtW&XAVA L-P, RoO Qoo�) Z-1 3 A4C RAO[CIL 1d,+ LA VWKL ar15G 11.1A &8�-�8'�� g,ZrOA, T sc,Ilae � 5�G Cslrre. c�..91andv;ew AUE qoq �- o� L?e�ay4� Zq o 7Zoo• Cot-\\ o wAY cl o 9 -'1 \-7- �a �( CA cuioi L PCU r Ef�� NMA Nwpv 'eve �i�1 i%- v,5 7 2 5 ) F'(2S s"V(o3�AAF 1Tr 1 - 98o-b33 b �C,TR L o►�n/-� `1U5 9 yS-S 5�(� EXHIBIT M H, I,&J33 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith August 17, 2010 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00909 - NASSEF ESKANDER (FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) - A proposal to demolish an existing veterinarian office and construct a new veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of 25,705 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at the northeast comer of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue at 7289 Amethyst Avenue. The proposed project includes incorporating an existing residence to the north of the site at 7271 Amethyst Avenue as part of the project APN: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related Files: Pre-Application Review DRC2007-00733, Minor Exception DRC2009-00360, and Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697. This item was originally scheduled for review by the Committee on July 6, 2010. At the applicant's request, this item was postponed to August 17, 2010. Design Parameters: The project site is comprised of three (3) parcels with a combined area of 25,705 feet (0.59-acre). Overall the project site is approximately 158 feet deep (north to south) and approximately 165 feet wide (east to west). The project site is developed with four (4) structures — a veterinarian hospital located in two buildings of 2,308 and 760 square feet (Buildings 1 and 2, respectively); a single-family residence of 745 square feet; and a garage of 201 square feet Vegetation on-site is limited to low grasses and a few trees. To the north, are single-family residences. To the south, across Base Line Road, is a senior assisted living facility and to the west, across Amethyst Avenue, is an office/commercial building and a single-family residence. The property to the east is vacant. The zoning of the property and the properties to the east,west, and north is General Commercial (GC) District. The zoning of the properties to the south is Office/Professional (OP) District The topography of the site is generally level with an elevation of approximately 1,376 feet at the north side of the site and approximately 1,370 feet at the south side. As the project site is comprised of three (3) parcels, the applicant will be required to submit an application to combine the lots as a condition of approval. The applicant, on behalf of his client, proposes to demolish the two (2) buildings (identified by staff as Buildings 1 and 2 for clarity) occupied by the veterinarian hospital and construct one new building of 5,710 square feet in its place. The veterinarian hospital will be relocated to this building, and as it will occupy 4,815 square feet of the building, will be the primary tenant. The remaining 895 square feet of floor area of the new building will be for an unspecified retail tenant. The existing garage will be demolished, and the existing single-family residence will be converted for office use only. In order to allow the veterinarian hospital to operate with minimum interruption, the new building will be constructed in two (2) phases. During Phase 1, Building 2 will be demolished first and approximately 4,700 square feet of the new building will be constructed. The veterinarian hospital will then be relocated, and during Phase 2, Building 1 will be demolished and the remaining 1,000 square feet of the new building will be constructed. Additional site improvements include a new parking lot, new landscaping, new property line walls/fences, and the removal of the existing driveway at Amethyst Avenue, which is currently 75 feet north of the intersection of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue, and the construction of a new one that will be approximately 120 feet from the intersection. The parking requirement for the new building and the converted office will be 31 parking stalls. The project will have only 24 parking stalls because of the size of the site and the presence of the existing structures. To address this deficiency, the applicant has submitted an application for a Minor Exception (Related File: DRC2009-00360) which, if approved, permits a reduction of up to 25 percent in the parking requirement. EXHIBIT 14 H_1_&134 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00909-NASSEF ESKANDER(FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) August 17, 2010 Page 2 To ensure compatibility with the surrounding development and consistency with Section 17.10.060(C)(1)O) — Master Planning — of.the Development Code, at the direction of staff, the applicant has provided an east to west drive aisle that extends the full width of the property and terminates at the east property line shared with the vacant property to the east (APN: 0202-161-09). Upon future development of that property, this drive aisle will connect with the drive aisle and parking area of the future development. This will allow that property owner secondary access to Amethyst Avenue, and conversely, allow the project site secondary access to Base Line Road. Note: The applicant has indicated that his client is willing to provide access but is not willing to provide an access easement.. At a Pre-Application Workshop (Related File: DRC2007-00733) held on March 12, 2008, the proposal was reviewed by the Planning Commission (Attachment A). The Commissioners generally favored the concept of the project. They emphasized to the applicant that the architecture of the proposed building should be sensitive to the historic character of the surrounding neighborhood and consideration given to the location of the site at the "gateway" of, and relationship to, the historic Old Alta Loma neighborhood. The applicant was directed to incorporate Craftsman-style elements to the building. Additionally, it was suggested that the applicant review the architectural elements used on the Sunrise Assisted Living facility(Related File: Development Review DR99-32), located directly across the street. The architecture of the proposed building reflects the direction provided by the DRC Committee as noted above. The proposed building will be of wood-frame construction and will be similar in appearance to the • buildings in the general area, including the single-family residences and the assisted living facility across the street (Attachment B). The building will incorporate key elements of the Craftsman style: a mixed combination of a hip and gable roof that varies in height and form; wainscots on all elevations finished with river rock; numerous column elements finished with river rock; building walls finished alternately with stucco or horizontal wood siding; exposed decorative rafter tails; and wood beams. The building will be painted with a palette of three basic colors. Glass will be provided on all elevations. Along the entire south side of the building, and over the south entrances, there will be a large roof overhang supported by columns that will provide a strong visual statement along Base Line Road. Secondarily, this overhang will provide shade along the sunward south elevation. At the north entrances, there will be a set of prominent gable roof overhangs that will provide a focal point as seen from the parking lot. At the west entrance of the retail space, there will a gable roof and a small overhead trellis. Through the use of these elements, the building will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood and enhance and emphasize the character of the Old Alta Loma community. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. The Committee should review the applicant's concern regarding the provision of an access easement through his property in favor of the property owner to the east and the importance of successful master planning. 2. The color scheme of the new building and the house (that will be converted to an office) shall match. This includes the color of the wood siding, the fascia boards, exposed rafters, beams, and the roofing tile. • H, I,&J35 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00909- NASSEF ESKANDER(FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) August 17, 2010 Page 3 3. The color scheme on the building shall be consistent. The color of the roof, rafters, fascia, trellis, and stucco are "warm," while the colors of the river rock, trim caps, and wood siding are "cool." Revise the color scheme to be either all "warm"or all "cool." 4. The overhead members of the trellis feature are proposed to be constructed of wood. The Committee has indicated in the past a preference for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) for durability. The Committee may want to consider and allow the use of wood for this project for consistency with the wood rafter tails and exposed wood beams. 5. In order to reflect authentic Craftsman-style architecture, all columns (square and cylindrical) should be modified to be battered. 6. The roof of the building is proposed to be rust-colored 'S'-tile roofing. This type of roofing tile is not consistent with the Craftsman style architecture. Flat concrete (or equivalent) roofing the shall be used instead. 7. The fenestration selections (doors and windows) should be modified to reflect authentic Craftsman style architecture. 8. At the north and south elevations, there is vertical wood siding under two sets of gable roof elements. The rest of the building is designed'with horizontal wood siding, which makes the vertical wood siding appear awkward. In order to reflect authentic Craftsman-style architecture, the vertical wood siding should be modified to shingle siding. 9. The materials of the existing house that will be converted to an office shall be refinished to match the proposed building. At a minimum, the refinishing should include a river rock wainscot around the base of the porch. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along the structure at an equivalent of one tree per 30 linear feet of building, which has public exposure per Section 17.10.040(Cx3Xa) of the Development Code. Provide two trees along the east side of the building. 2. The landscaping at the southwest comer of the site, near the intersection, "frames" the entry into the Alta Loma neighborhood and is a focal point. Therefore, the landscaping at this location shall be enhanced with more elaborate, decorative ground cover and shrubs. 3. Install windows instead of constructing decorative tile features on either side of the west entrance to the retail space. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices, etc. shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. H.I.&J36 DRC ACTION AGENDA • DRC2008-00909-NASSEF ESKANDER(FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) August 17, 2010 Page 4 2. The Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened on three sides behind the 4-foot high metal mesh fence. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 3. Wherever river rock is proposed it shall be real river rock and not a manufactured veneer. 4. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 5. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 6. The trash enclosure shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. The proposed enclosure should, at a minimum, include a river rock wainscot. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved subject to the completion of the recommended revisions, to be verified by staff, and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Desion Review Committee Action: The Committee reviewed the application and deemed it acceptable to forward to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee concluded that the architecture of the building was consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and the • Craftsman theme. The Committee discussed the major and secondary issues described in the Comments Report with the applicant. The applicant revised his proposal prior to the meeting to address the comments in the Comments Report. The revisions are as follows: • The colors used for the building will be cool, gray shades; • All of the columns will be battered; • The trellis feature will be constructed of composite wood, while the rafters will be constructed of real wood; • The roof tiles will be flat; and • The vertical siding will be changed to horizontal siding. The Committee considered the applicant's request to provide an access agreement as opposed to an access easement as a means of ensuring reciprocal access for the property to the east; they approved that solution provided that the agreement was acceptable to the City Attorney. The applicant will prepare the document to be forwarded to the City Attorney. The applicant was directed not to put river rock on the existing residence. The decorative file feature at the west elevation of the building will be replaced with wood siding. The applicant agreed to complete and comply with the policy issues. The final revisions will be submitted for staff review prior to scheduling of the item for Planning Commission review and action. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Burnett • Staff Planner. Mike Smith Attachment C- Photo H. I.&J37 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith August 17, 2010 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2009-00697 - NASSEF ESKANDER (FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) -A proposed Uniform Sign Program for Development Review DRC2008-00909, a proposed veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of approximately 23,000 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at the northeast comer at 7289 Amethyst Avenue. The proposal includes incorporating an existing residence to the north of the site at 7271 Amethyst Avenue as part of the project. APN: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related file: Pre-Application Review DRC2007-00733, Development Review DRC2008-00909, and Minor Exception DRC2009-00360. This item was originally scheduled for review by the Committee on July 6, 2010. At the applicant's request,this item was postponed to August 17, 2010. Background: The proposed sign program is for a new building of 5,710 square feet that will be occupied by a veterinarian hospital and an unspecified retail tenant. The basic layout of the building will have its primary was oriented east to west with the hospital occupying 4,815 square feet of the eastern portion of the building and the retail tenant space occupying the remaining 895 square feet of the western portion of the building. The hospital will have entrances on the south and north elevations, while the retail space will have entrances on the north, south, and west elevations. Design Parameters: The program proposes three categories of wall signs — Sign Type "A" for the wall signs, Sign Type "B"for vinyl window signs (for the purpose of convenience information such as hours of operation, telephone numbers, etc.), and Sign Type"C'for the monument sign. In general, the proposed sign program complies with the standards and guidelines set forth in the Sign Ordinance, including the maximum number of signs per tenant, wall sign construction/materials, and the basic dimensions of each wall sign, including sign area and text height. Each proposed sign location and area meets the intent of the Sign Ordinance. There are some minor corrections and additions in the text that are required. The applicant proposes a standardized font (Helvetica Regular) with the option to allow for corporate trademarked font, colors, and logos. Staff has no concerns with this font as it is legible and similar to other fonts used on other commercial locations. Likewise, the option to have corporate trademarked font or colors is acceptable as it is a Planning Department policy to allow them. The wall signs (Sign Type "A")will be constructed of individual internally illuminated 4-inch thick channel letters—box, cabinet, and painted signs will be prohibited. These signs will be mounted 2 inches off the wall plane with raceways located behind the wall. The proposed maximum vertical dimension for a line of text and/or the logo on a one-line sign is 24 inches; for a two-line sign the maximum vertical dimension is 26 inches (10 inches per line with 6 inches between the lines). The proposed maximum horizontal dimension for a line of text, including the logo for both one- and two-line signs, is 8 feet. The proposed maximum sign area is 16 square feet (one-line signs) and 17.3 square feet (two-line signs). The wall signs will not negatively impact any significant architectural features, elements, or details. The proposed sign locations will be on the elevations facing Base Line Road, Amethyst Avenue, and the parking lot. The specific location of each sign will be on the wall planes under the gable roofs directly over the entrances. Because of the internal layout of the building, only the retail space will have a sign on the west elevation. No signs are proposed or permitted on the east elevation of the building or on any elevation of the existing house that will be converted to an office. In all cases, the sign program clearly states the sign location restrictions (or will be revised to state the restrictions). H. I.&J38 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2009-00697-NASSEF ESKANDER(FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) August 17, 2010 Page 2 The window signs (Sign Type "B"), the Sign Ordinance exempts "convenience signs" that are less than 3 square feet(1,296 square inches) in area. The proposed convenience signs will be 140 square inches (per tenant). The monument sign (Sign Type "C") will be located at the southwest comer of the project site near the intersection of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue. It will be constructed of two (2) pillars finished with river rock and decorative caps with two concrete panels (one for each tenant) bridging the pillars. Both sides of the panels, constructed of concrete 6 inches thick, will serve as the surface to which individual 3/4-inch thick plastic letters will be attached. The monument sign will be externally illuminated by ground-mounted lights. The proposed maximum vertical dimension for a line of text and/or the logo on a one-line sign is 10 inches; for a two-line sign the maximum vertical dimension is 26 inches (10 inches per line with 6 inches between lines). The proposed maximum horizontal dimension for a line of text, including the logo for both one- and two-line signs, is slightly less than 8 feet. The proposed maximum sign area will be about 6.7 square feet (one-line signs) and 17.3 square feet (two-line signs). The overall height of the monument sign will be 8 feet measured from the finished grade to the top of the pillars —the maximum allowed by the Sign Ordinance. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. • 1. The maximum vertical dimension for a wall sign comprised of one line of text shall be 18-inches as opposed to 24 inches for consistency with other similar signs for minor retail tenants, i.e. non-anchor retail tenants, located at other commercial locations. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All sign areas shall be horizontally centered under the ridgeline of the gable roof directly above each sign and shall be located equidistant on the top and bottom from the nearest architectural feature. 2. The river rock on the pillars of the monument sign shall be real river rock and not a manufactured veneer. 3. Correct minor text errors within the sign program and add more information for clarity of the requirements. Include in the corrections a statement that all tenants shall be limited to having a total of three (3) signs with the option of either three wall signs and no sign on the monument or 2 wall signs with one sign on the monument. Contact staff for further discussion. 4. The applicant is advised that the addition of any tenants warranting additional sign locations or any • modifications to the location and physical dimensions of signs, will require an amendment to this Uniform Sign Program for review and approval by the Planning Director and/or the Design Review Committee. H. I.&J39 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2009-00697- NASSEF ESKANDER(FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) August 17, 2010 Page 3 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Uniform Sign Program be approved, subject to the completion of the recommended revisions, to be verified by staff, and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Deslan.Review Committee Action: Staff recommends that the Uniform Sign Program be approved, subject to the completion of the recommended revisions, to be verified by staff, and forwarded to the Planning Director for review and action. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Burnett Staff Planner: Mike Smith H.I.&140 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith April 19, 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT/DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-00909 - NASSEF ESKANDER (FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) - A proposal to demolish an existing veterinarian office and construct a new veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of 25,705 square feet in the General Commercial (GC) District, located at the northeast comer at 7289 Amethyst Avenue; the proposal includes incorporating an existing residence to the north of the site at 7271 Amethyst Avenue as part of the project - APN: 0202-161-10, -11, and -20. Related file: Pre-Application Review DRC2007-00733 and Minor Exception DRC2009-00360. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction. Background: This application was previously reviewed by the Design Review Committee on August 17, 2010. The Committee reviewed the application and deemed it acceptable to forward to the Planning Commission for review and action. The Committee concluded that the architecture of the building, including revisions proposed by the applicant, was consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and the Craftsman theme (Exhibit A). The only remaining issue that needed to be resolved was how to ensure compatibility with the surrounding development consistent with Section 17.10.060 C 1 — Master Planning — of the Development Code. At the direction of staff, ( )( )U) p the applicant provided an east to west drive aisle that extends the full width of the property and terminates at the east property line shared with the vacant property to the east (APN: 0202-161-09). Upon future development of that property, this drive aisle would connect with the drive aisle and parking area of the future development. This would allow that property owner secondary access to Amethyst Avenue and, conversely, allow the project site secondary access to Base Line Road (Exhibit B). The applicant responded that his client was willing to provide access but was not willing to provide an access easement. The applicant requested to be allowed to provide an access agreement as opposed to an access easement as a means of ensuring reciprocal access for the property to the east. The Committee approved this solution provided that the agreement was acceptable to the City Attorney. Subsequently, staff forwarded to the City Attorney a draft of the access agreement prepared by the applicant (Exhibit C). After reviewing the document, the attorney determined that the draft access agreement as submitted was not acceptable. He indicated that the document that was submitted was not sufficient for the purpose of ensuring access by the property owner to the east as it was neither comprehensive enough nor enforceable. In the interim period between then and now, staff and the applicant exchanged correspondence and conducted a meeting to further discuss the issue. The applicant indicated that they do not want to provide an easement or agreement in the absence of knowing what type of development would occur on the neighboring property(Exhibit D). Staff indicated to the applicant that an access easementlagreement is required for three general reasons: 1. Eliminate the need for delivery vehicles having to enter the property in reverse (or exit in reverse) which may disrupt traffic flow and potentially be a safety issue. There is only one drive access • proposed to the property, and there is insufficient turnaround space on the property to allow a delivery truck to enter and exit the property in the forward direction; EXHIBIT O H. I_&J41 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2008-00909— NASSEFF ESKANDER(FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) April 19, 2011 Page 2 2. Minimize the potential for multiple driveways along Base Line Road, ensure efficient traffic flow, and eliminate unnecessary paving that could otherwise be landscaping; and 3. Allow integrated commercial development with the adjacent properties. During the neighborhood meeting conducted on June 30, 2010, one of the principal issues raised by one of the attendees was the delivery truck and the manner in which it entered/exited the subject property (this is consistent with the first reason indicated by staff above). The solution to the issue was that eventually a continuous drive aisle would be provided in the future that would connect Amethyst Avenue and Base Line Road. This solution was acceptable to those in attendance. As the applicant does not want to do this, staff noted that a turnaround on-site would have to be provided. As an alternate solution, the applicant suggested limiting the type of the delivery vehicle to a size that would allow parking in a regular parking stall (as opposed to the delivery currently in use Exhibit E). This would eliminate the need for a turnaround which would require revisions to the parking area which, in tum, could reduce the number of proposed parking stalls. . Staff is resubmitting the project for Committee review for its consideration of this issue only and discussion of possible alternatives as the Design Review Committee's condition of approval is not being fulfilled. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. 1. Does the Committee accept the project without an easement or access agreement in favor of the property to the east? Note: the applicant's solution to utilize smaller delivery vehicles cannot be enforced as the application is not a Conditional Use Permit, i.e. there will not be any opportunity to review compliance of conditions of approval following commencement of operations. In the event of non-compliance, there will not be a penalty for the "violation" or a means for ensuring that the "violation" is corrected. 2. If the Committee accepts the applicant's solution, then the proposed drive aisle connection to the property to the east should be eliminated, and a continuous planter area (with trees and ground cover)and a block wall shall be provided in its place. 3. If the Committee accepts the applicant's solution, does the Committee want a turnaround to be provided on the project site or is the use of a regular parking stall acceptable? Note: a turnaround will require revisions to the proposed parking area. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests direction on this matter. The project is otherwise unchanged. The project can be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action provided the solution offered by the applicant is acceptable. Desian Review Committee Action: The Committee discussed with the applicant the purpose for providing access to the neighboring property to the east and the reasons why an easement or access agreement is required. The applicant stated that his client was willing to provide a physical connection, i.e. a drive aisle that will connect with any future drive aisle on the neighboring property, but that he was unwilling to provide a legal document to ensure it citing the concerns noted H. I.&J42 DRC ACTION AGENDA ® DRC2008-00909— NASSEFF ESKANDER(FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL) April 19, 2011 Page 3 above. Additionally, the applicant indicated that he was uncertain of the required content of the agreement that would be comprehensive and enforceable. He also was concerned about the review process for such a document. The Committee advised the applicant to consult an attorney. The Committee reaffirmed their position that an access agreement acceptable to the City Attorney is a condition of approval. They stated that the applicant had the option of advancing to the Planning Commission for review, but in the absence of an access agreement, it would be without a recommendation of approval by the Committee. The applicant stated he would consult with his client and decide what to do next. Members Present: Munoz, Wimberly, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith • H, I,&J43 ALTA LOMA PLAZA 7289 8 7271 AMETHYST STREET cmo�au�xoq OWNER DEC 29 2as Mr. & Mrs. N. NASERE '� NASSEF ESKANDER & ASSOC. • Nassef Eskander, AIA (626)233-1114 nessef46470vahoo.com UNFORM.. SOONPROGRAM CASA # DRC 2009 - 00697 RELATED TO: CASE # DRC 2008 -00909 REVISED 11/20/09 Date: 6/18/09 EXHIBIT ....[Type tert] Page 1 H,I,&144 TABLE OF CONTENTS: • GENERAL NOTES 3 • GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS 4 • TENANT WALL SIGN TYPE "A" ' 5 • TENANT SIGN TYPE "B" 5 • TENANT SIGN TYPE "C" 5 • EXHIBIT FOR SIGN TYPE "A" 6 • EXHIBIT FOR SIGN TYPE "B° 6 • EXHIBIT FOR MONUMENT SIGN "C" 7 • BUILDING SITE PLAN 8 • BUILDING ELEVATIONS (sHEETs A-8&9) 9 • BUILDING ELEVATIONS 10 • DETAILED ELEVATIONS (souTH, WEST&NORTH ELEVATIONS) 11 • MONUMENT SIGN DETAIL 14 • CHANNEL LETTERS DETAILS 16 USP#....:..:............:..............[Type text] Page 2 H. I.&J45 • GENERAL NOTES: The purpose of these criteria is to establish the minimum sign standard necessary to insure coordinated proportional exposure for all tenants. Performance shall be strictly enforced and any non-conforming signs shall be removed by the Tenant or his sign Contractor at their expense. For identification purposes, the Alta Loma Animal Hospital will be the "Primary Tenant" and the other tenant(s)will be identified as the "Secondary Tenant(s)°. UMiT� 1. Each-Tenant within the retail portion of the development is-required- to have a maximum of 3 Signs including the Monument Sign. Type "A" sign is the typical sign for this development. All designs, colors and shop drawings must be submitted to the Landlord and Architect for review and approval prior to submitting to the City. Tenant must submit three (3) color copies of his proposed sign to the City. 2. A sign permit application signed by the property owner, and applicable fees to be paid to the City prior to the construction and installation of the sign(s). 3. The Tenant shall pay for all signs and their installation and maintenance. 4. The Tenant shall submit Landlord approved drawings to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for review and approval prior to installation. The applicant is responsible for all permit fees. 5. All signs and their installation must comply with all local Building and Electrical Codes. All signs shall be in accordance with the sign criteria and the City's Sign Ordinance requirements. All signs shall be subject to the review and approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety, and Planning Departments. • USP#....................................[Type text] Page 3 H. I.&J46 6. Tenant shall be allowed to place a sign of Hand Painted, Decal, or stick-on lettering or graphics at the side fixed panel adjacent to the door as follows: • A not to exceed 140 square inches (Sign Type C) indicating hours of business, emergency telephone numbers to contact, approved credit cards, etc. No other window signage will be allowed, including but not limited to, temporary signs, sale banners, posters, and product information. 7. "Chain" Type tenants are permitted to use "Trademarked" colors, fonts, and logos. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS: 1.. No Animated, Flashing, or Audible signs will be permitted 2. No exposed tubing or lamps will be penrritted . 3. No exposed raceways, crossovers, conduits, conductors, transformers, etc., shall be permitted, . 4. Sign Contractor shall provide sign shop drawings to the Owner& Architect for review. Shop drawings will includes also, all necessary fastening and bracing to securely install signs (for wind loads ... etc.) see General Note#5 in regards of City approvals. 5. All signs shall be constructed of individual letters (see type of signs in page# 5) - Box, cabinet, and painted sign(s) are prohibited. USP#....................................[Type text] Page 4 H.I.&147 TENANT WALL SIGN — SIGN TYPE IIAII This sign is located above main entrance of the retail space fronting the public access way (or parking lot)and shall be a maximum face area of 8' (eight feet) long X 30" (thirty inches) high and made of Red Plexiglas #2793 RED (see page#6) letters will be 2" (two inch) thick Minimum& placed as shown on the elevations. Letters will be 12" (twelve inches) High & 1.5" Stroke for the two lines sign. Letters will be 24" High & 2" Stroke for one line. This sign will have individual lighted letters mounted to the wall. TENANT WALL SIGN — SIGN TYPE "G" This signs on the glass panels at the right or left Main Entrance Doors - See North & South elevations attached, sign will be multiple lines - Maximum sign face area is 140 sq. inches. This sign is for credit cards, operating hours, telephone number .....etc. • MONUMENT SIGN TYPE "C" Free standing sign (see site plan sheet A-2 for location) for the Primary and other Tenant (s). This sign has exterior flood lights for illumination at the grade level —See landscape drawings - Sheet L-4 "Site lighting" for location and lighting type fixtures. USP#....................................[Type text) Page 5 H. I.&J48 EXHIBIT FOR SIGN TYPE "A" ILLUMINATED CLOSED CHANNEL LETTERS - PLEXIGLASS #2793 RED FACE LETTERS. 1Il TYP 0 0 �1 018 FOR TWO LINES 24 nN 10 (olE-I N O- L� FOR SINGLE LINE • HELVETICA REGULAR LETTERING.STYLE. • SEE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST ELEVATIONS ATTACHED. • CONSTRUCTED OF INDIVIDUAL CLOSED CHANNEL LETTERS ALL LETTERS WILL BE ILLUMINATED (SEE GENERAL SPECIFICATION #5). USP#......:.............................[Type text] Page 6 H. I.&J49 • EXHIBIT FOR SIGN TYPE "B" • SEE ATTACHED NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATION. EXHIBIT FOR MONUMENT SIGN TYPE "C" EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED PLEXIGLASS FACE LETTERS. ao 0 0 0 0 FOR DOUBLE LINE FOR SINGLE LINE • HELVETICA REGULAR LETTERING STYLE FOR DOUBLE LINE SIGN. • HELVETICA TALL LETTERING STYLE FOR SINGLE LINE SIGN. • SEE ATTACHED SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION. [JSP#....................................[Type text] Page 7 H, I,&J50 g s�vd [ 4 a�....................................#dSfl 4 2 3 i o 34 • I �= Nn.3m at..1 avoa 3 - NOIS I a0000rw►•mm.ma�w....r: Dario, mownNow 0000io-aracro.d.,w...m,: ��rio, oarom-w►-aamwyw•mun1,: otemn oil, $tea ----- ------•..,1�. -- " " --- .�: ..1...x.•1 :>.�a �� swua•*scwA af-•uiwu.r. Doll sn ana re rmu aanlu lo. _ I, I a.MilO , i.iO.YY.0i0..i.•q e-- � a < OEMod XMI •a.n r..•aornr e II � i ,� � �^� � �aoeorwlsmMO&WeerwI _ a N N Sa s.. we.oal�.m'.u'a'•.a0 ...�......•tee..... ate.irar WAN OVA a ------_- o ® ® �° I .� (11 3SVHd NV'M 3118 e�tst MW poled a�ossrasy MT -�� eaouu WWI 1 W, tm.eK OF- %i wrura>t No5N38 reo�. —a. 1 u•...... 1 • i A711rj 3101x8 alaa9MeY..... REMSiON Immm 7mm anon 000000 ® - I• EMU= —-- — — — _ lei V �i EED ilia y Jll WEST ELEVATION NO SIGNS PERMITTED $*s r8XVATMvW&F.R) ON THE CONVERTED SIGN LOCATION ON THE wEST ELEVATION STRUCTURE RESERVED FOR THE SECONDARY TENANT. "s--1-' o w N( z a u As•e .n n USP#....................................(Type text] Paye q REVISION 1=0 Y26109 \ 7Mg9 IVWgB I I 8 i NORTWELEVATION Ro w ---- a it 'lid So- EAST ELEVATION NO SIGNS PEWMED ON THE EAST ELEVATION ,� o a yyU�� w USP#.....................................[Type text] ......■........■■.....�- mMIN � .�� ■ �■_, _.i iii■��� 11 III) IIII I,]�I III ��--.�� =■■�`=)�� IIi;� ('� III I _ Iiiq i �� IIS un. �..- IIIL. 1111►q ulll�alu,..u. IIII � IIII Illllr�ll�� 11�,� 1 �■si .• 11111 IIG �`°�;�:l � 'TLa1► IIII •-■�• 111► 11� ��� i �,� I ::' 1111�11�11�1�11�111111�111�111� ��.■■■■■moi I��I ^I '' �fll 1 I I 1 I 1 ��■■■ ••••■■awn■■•.• 1111n1i !:1i::il±::ili,iliil' I .■BILI � >�; t: �-• •. (�l Ill � S:t s: � �__ MIN t " _' I I ' 44•,x. • � . 4' r 4: ��I 0. ►.SSS. s � •:_�: MilkNINE U SOUTH • (BASE LINE ROAD •, �a REVISION 1IOQlpp �aeNs i/1010Y t1flGWB SIGN A 1111 111 LAY 11111 1 11111 111 1 11111111[111 1 111111 111111 �a lid Ln 7289 via ss WEST ELEVATION -'-M (AMETHYST STREET ELEVATION) tt''•t' �m as u o USP#.....:..............................[Type tC7[[] P43 E2 REVISION 1;; MAM 7RWOC fills B SIGs A �a Id Ln a all � 81 Li NORTH ELEVATION siva a .: sba e IN•.i' ani � � o z u sm USP#....................................[Type text] �a9e 13 12"H.CONCRETE MOULDING TYP. 3/8"WIDE X 3/8'DEEP N REVEEL TYP. iv D LTA LOMA_ AjNAL HOSPITA "' o o � o ¢ SHOP H.OPENDACE MONUMENT ELEVATION (N.T.S) SEC. D - D 10 14' loo3' LETTERING BOTH 3' ol SIDES TYP. D N d �O D "2' MONUMENT SIGN PLAN (N.T.S) MONUMENT SIGN "C" USP#....................................[Type text] f�ge 14 H_I_&157 MONUMENT SIGN " C " • MONUMENT SIGN NOTES: 1- THE PILASTERS WILL BE COVERED WITH REAL RIVERROCK VENEER TO MATCH ELEVATIONS. 2- THE SLAB BETWEEN THE TWO PILASTERS WILL BE SMOOTH FINISH CONCRETE SLAB (GRAY COLOR) WITH SURFACE MOUNTED LETTERS FOR THE STORE(S) NAME(S). 3- THE LETTERS FOR THE PRIMARY STORE WILL BE ON TWO LINES MAX. WITH SURFACE MOUNTED LETTERS: 1.25" STROKE X 10" HIGH X 1/2" THICK LETTERS 4 THE LETTERS FOR THE RETAIL STORE WILL BE ON ONE LINE. MAX., SURFACE MOUNTED LETTERS: 1.25" STROKE X 10" HIGH X 1/2" THICK LETTERS 5- IF THE PRIMARY STORE HAVE ONE LINE, THE LETTERS WILL BE: 2" STROKE X 18" HIGH X 3/4" THICK LETTERS 8- ALL PLEXIGLASS LETTERING USED FOR THIS SIGN(S)WILL BE OF RED COLOR #2793 . 7- CONCRETE MOLDING AT THE TOP OF THE PILASTER (CAPS) TO BE OF THE NATURAL CEMENT COLOR (GRAY COLOR). USP#....................................[Type text] Page 15 H_ IR15R CHANNEL LETTER CONSTRUCTION DETAIL .063 ALUMINUM SA TRAN 5 FiOWEf- WPI.Ex T ---i FACS ----j . ��►ss K6oN Toss it suppLAT -4' SEEP,, .o4o 2� ALUMINUM RETOWS PAwrE.D CHANNEL LETTERS ARE MOUNTED TWO INCHES OFF THE WALL VIA STANDOFFS. THE FRONT FACE WILL BE 3/16' TH. RED PLEXIGLAS #2793, THE LETTERS WILL HAVE .04 ALUMINUM RETURNS (WHICH WILL BE PAINTED)AND .063 ALUMINUM BACKS. THE LETTERS WILL HAVE 10 MM. NEON TUBING LIGHTS SUPPORTED WITH GLASS NEON TUBE SUPPORTS. A UL APPROVED TRANSFORMER WILL BE PROVIDED. USP#....................................[Type text] Ri9e I!o H_1_&159 "ITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ALTA LOMITA ANIMAL HOSPITAL DEC 4 2009 • Dr.NABIL NASRE,D.V.M. RECEIVED-PLANNING Date: November 20,2009 To: City of RANCHO CUCAMONGA Planning Director SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION PHASING OF THE PROPOSED ANIMAL HOSPITAL PROJECT. CASE#DRC2008-00904 This is a written document outlining the above referenced project in regards to: - Use of the building - Hours of operation - Number of current and proposed employees - Numbers and types of pets to be cared for • - Potential use of the existing house All site improvements and developments required to meet all applicable Building and Planning Codes and Regulations. PROJECT DISCRIPTION: This project involves the demolition and replacement of an existing 3200 sq. ft. Animal Clinic Facility with a new, state of the art,4815 sq. ft. Animal Hospital and Boarding Facility. The current building is very old and deteriorated. The gradual decline of the facility over time now prohibits the installation of new, state of the art, equipment necessary for the care of our client's pets. The new facility will be 4815 sq. ft. (including a 700 sq. ft. Mezzanine Level as a lounge for employees of the facility). It will provide a grand lobby with a front reception desk, four(4) exam rooms, a surgical suite, an X-Ray room, a doctor's office and library, an animal grooming area, cat cages (for approximately 25 cats), dog kennels(for approximately 20 dogs), and a dog observation kennel. The clinic will also include a pharmacy for strict clinic use as well as all other required facilities necessary in serving clients and employees (i.e. restrooms). A new 895 sq. ft. retail store will be attached to the clinic which may serve as potential integrated business to the clinic or provide other services to the community. • EXHIBIT Q 1 H.I.&J60 An existing Single family House located on the North West corner of the property will be converted into office space. The exterior of the House will be maintained and refurbished with new paint, landscaping, and roofing with regards to all City rules and regulations for such buildings. The interior of the House will be painted and all flooring replaced. CLINIC STAFF: The existing staff currently serving the clinic includes a Veterinary Doctor,three(3) . technical assistants, and part-time clinic administrator—most of which are residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Following expansion and renovation,we anticipate and are planning to hire additional personnel to accommodate the increased work load. New staff will include a full-time and a part-time Veterinary Doctor, five(5) technical assistants, and a full-time clinic administrator. We anticipate the new hires to be residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as well. It is anticipated that the new store adjacent to the clinic will create employment opportunities for 3-5 individuals. HOURS OF OPERATION: The Clinic will operate Monday thru Friday-from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM and from 8:30AM to 1:00 PM on Saturday. The Clinic will be closed on Sundays. "Emergency Calls"will be accepted Monday thru Friday from 5:00 PM to Midnight. PARIONG ACCOMODATIONS: The required number of parking spaces for a project of this size and scope is thirty.one (3 1) spaces. Currently,24 parking spaces are provided. Most of our clients(>90%) bring their pets in by appointments. Some leave their pets for treatment and return at a later time, while others wait until all services have been rendered and the pets discharged in their care. Our existing facility has never had an issue.with parking:accommodations. It is very uncommon to find more than 5-7 vehicles parked in the parking lot at any one time. Given the current accommodations, we have applied for a"Minor Modification"to reduce the number of parking spaces from thirty one(3 1)to twenty four(24). 2 H,I,&J61 PROJECT PHASING: This project poses a unique and challenging situation where the owner and design& construction team would like to maintain the current facility operational, while moving forward with construction and renovation. This will minimize the burden on clients and still provide them with a consistent location where their pets may receive care. Therefore, we are planning to phase the construction of the project into two (2)phases as follows below: (see sheets AD-1 &AD-2) Phase One(D: - Demolition of the accessory building adjacent to the clinic (as shown on . Sheet AD-1) - Site grading - Site fencing - Paving of parking lot - Placement of storm drain systems - Building the proposed new Animal Hospital (as shown on "Exhibit A/ Phase I/ Sheet A-1 ) - All Fire department requirements, Double Detection System & Fire Dept Connections - Portion of North Site landscaping Phase one(1) will comply with all required building codes and regulations to secure a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy(TCO). Upon securing the TCO, for Phase one(1)the work will commence on Phase two (11). Phase Two (ID: Demolition of the single family garage and driveway, driveway apron, and complete the Animal Hospital Building&Retail Space as shown on "Exhibit B"/Phase Il/Sheet A-2). Completion of landscaping along Base line Rd. Building monument sign - Base Line Rd street widening(new curb&gutter) - Relocation of traffic signs and power poles - Building signage - Decorative paving at the entrance of the parking lot - Complete paving and stripping of parking lot o The parking lot will have a 4 inch thick asphalt paving over 4 inch thick rock base (CAB). During Phase 1, we will provide 2 inch thick asphalt paving over the base rock, and in Phase 2, we will apply the remaining layer of 2 inch asphalt over the entire parking lot. 3 H, I,&J62 Refurbishment of the single family house and all landscaping. It is anticipated that the total construction duration of this project will take about eighteen (18) months. The construction of"Phase I"will take approximately twelve(12)months and"Phase 2" approximately six(6)months. This schedule includes two (2)months of float time. We sincerely appreciate your prompt attention and consideration for the approval of the above described project and its construction phasing. Thank You, Dr Nabil Nasre,D-V.M. Cc: Nassef Eskander&Associates File 4 H,1,&J63 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES Adjourned Meeting March 12, 2008 Chairman Stewart called the Adjourned Meeting of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission to order at 8:20 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Lou Munoz, Pam Stewart, Frances Howdyshell ABSENT: Ray Wimberly STAFF PRESENT: Corkran Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director; Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner; Mayuko Nakajima,Assistant Planner New Business PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW-DRC2007-00733-NASSEF ESKANDER-A pre-application review of the proposed demolition of an existing veterinary hospital to construct a new commercial development of about 5,900 square feet which would include a new veterinary hospital and retail spaces and incorporate a single family dwelling unit that is a potentially significant contributor to the • Aka Loma Neighborhood and future Historic District designation on three parcels (approximately 0.66 acres) located on the northeast comer of Amethyst Avenue and Base Line Road at 7271 Amethyst Avenue in the General Commercial(GC) District-APN:0202-161-10,0202-161-11,and 0202-161-20. Mayuko Nakajima,Assistant Planner,-introduced the Pre-Application Workshop process. Nassef Eskander, the applicant, gave an overview of the project that would consist of a new veterinary hospital and retail spaces. The project would also incorporate a single-family dwelling unit that is a potentially significant contributor to the Alta Loma Neighborhood. He explained that it would match the streetscape and architecture of the surrounding area. He also explained that it meets all setback requirements that were provided. He said that if enough parking was available,he would have preferred to add into the project a type of lounge,or rest area,for the doctor. Ms. Nakajima asked for clarification on the use of the potentially historic house on the north portion of the site. Mr. Eskander stated that it would still be used as a single-family residence and may even be occupied by one of the nurses that would be employed at the veterinary hospital. Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner, added that the area is intended to be rezoned as a Mixed Use designation from the current General Commercial designation in the future. Chairman Stewart asked if parking would be an issue if the house was to be converted into a • commercial use in the future. EXHIBIT R H IAIAA Ms. Bumett explained that the house would not be allowed to be converted into a commercial use if adequate parking spaces were not provided for the use. She also noted that this specific property is a difficult one to work with in regards to access because there is no connection to the east property. She said this was the reason for the required tumaround space in the applicant's proposal and that if in the future,a reciprocal access agreement were to be recorded amongst the adjoining property owners, the tumaround could be omitted to allow more space for parking. Mr. Eskander mentioned that he is dedicating 20 feet for the widening of Base Line Road. Ms. Nakajima explained that Engineering is requiring that the existing curb be removed and a new curb constructed to widen the street by three feet. Vice-Chairman Fletcher mentioned that this area should be noted carefully for its architecture because of its"downtown feel"and potential gateway for the historic Old Alta Loma neighborhood. Commissioner Munoz pointed out that there is too much distinction in the architecture between the veterinary hospital and the retail buildings. He thought that it should be consistent throughout the entire project, whether the use was intended for a hospital or retail. Commissioner Howdyshell concurred with her fellow Commissioners. She felt it was important to be sensitive to the historic character of the neighborhood and what is currently there. Chairman Stewart agreed with being consistent to the historic design of the neighborhood and suggested that the applicant implement some Craftsman-style elements to the buildings. She stated that the tower does not fit into the Craftsman-style category and should be removed. She also suggested looking at architectural elements from the"Sunrises assisted living building that is due south of the project site. Corkran Nicholson,Assistant Planning Director,added that the project needs design improvements (variation in roof heights, issues with proportion, etc.) and that Staff is willing to work with the applicant to develop an attractive architectural theme for the project. Overall, the Commissioners were favorable of the project concept. They noted that land use was not the main concem for this project but the architecture should be looked at more closely. The applicant thanked the Commissioners for their input and time. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjoumed.at 9:00 p.m. Respectfully sfubmitted, - & /1• James . Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: March 26, 2008 Planning Commission Workshop Minutes -2- March 12, 2008 H,I,&J65 RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909, A PROPOSAL TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING VETERINARIAN OFFICE AND CONSTRUCT A NEW VETERINARIAN OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL RETAIL BUILDING ON A PROPERTY OF 25,705 SQUARE FEET IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL(GC)DISTRICT LOCATED AT 7289 AMETHYST AVENUE; THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES INCORPORATING AN EXISTING RESIDENCE TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE AT 7271 AMETHYST AVENUE AS PART OF THE PROJECT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APNS: 0202-161-10, -11, AND-20. A. Recitals. 1. Nassef Eskander, on behalf of Alta Loma Animal Hospital, filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2008-00909 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of January 2014 the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. • 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 22, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a project site located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue; b. The project site is comprised of three(3)parcels with a combined area of 25,705(0.59- acre)with overall dimensions of about 158 feet(north-south)and about 165 feet(east-west); c. The project site is developed with four(4)structures. Two(2)buildings of 2,308 and 760 square feet are generally located at the south side of the project site and are occupied by the Alta Loma Animal Hospital(addressed as 7289 Amethyst Avenue). The other two(2)buildings are a single-family residence of 745 square feet and a garage of 201 square feet,and are generally located at the northwest comer of the project site; • d. The single-family residence (addressed as 7271 Amethyst Avenue Bennett House)is a potential local landmark per the City's Local Inventory of Historic Resources; the t t H, I,&J66 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 2 e. The majority of the site in the vicinity of the buildings used by the veterinary hospital is paved with asphalt. Vegetation on-site is limited to low grasses and a few trees; f. To the north are single-family residences while to the south,across Base Line Road,is a senior assisted living facility operated by Sunrise Senior Living. To the west,across Amethyst Avenue,is a commercial/office building and a single-family residence. The property to the east is vacant; g. The zoning of the project site and the properties to the east,west,and north is General Commercial(GC)District. All of the aforementioned residences are classified as"legal,non-conforming" structures as they are within a commercial zone. The zoning of the properties to the south is Office/Professional (OP) District; h. The applicant,on behalf of Alta Loma Animal Hospital,proposes to demolish the two(2) buildings(Buildings 1 and 2)that are currently occupied by the veterinarian hospital and construct one new building of 5,710 square feet in its place; i. The architecture of the proposed building reflects the direction provided by the Planning Commission during the Pre-Application Review Workshop held on March 8,2008. The proposed building will be of wood-frame construction and will be similar in appearance to the buildings in the general area including the single-family residences and the assisted living facility across the street; j. The parking requirement for the project is thirty-one(31)parking stalls. Due to the presence of the existing,single-family residence at the northwest comer of the project site(which is a potential local landmark)and the size and overall dimensions of the project site,the applicant is only proposing twenty-four(24)parking stalls. The applicant has submitted a.request for a Minor Exception(related file: DRC2009-00360)for a 25 percent reduction in the number of parking stalls that are necessary to fulfill the parking requirement for this project; k. Following the demolition of Buildings 1,2, and 4,and the construction of the new building,the total building floor area,including the single-family residence,will be 6,455 square feet and the FAR will be 25 percent(6,455/25,705=0.25). Per Chapter 2,Figure LU-2 Land Use Plan of the General Plan, the maximum Floor Area Ratio(FAR)in the General Commercial(GC)land use category is 25-35 percent; I. This application is in conjunction with Minor Exception DRC2008-00360 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to demolish the two(2)buildings that are currently occupied by the veterinarian hospital and construct one new building of 5,710 square feet in its place. The veterinary hospital that occupies the two buildings will be relocated into the new building. The underlying General Plan designation is General Commercial. H, I,&J67 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL • January 22, 2014 Page 3 b. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is currently developed with four(4)structures;two(2)of buildings are occupied by the Alta Loma Animal Hospital.These buildings will be demolished and a new building will be constructed in their place. The veterinary hospital will be relocated into the new building. The proposed uses are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where the project site located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the project site and the properties to the east,west,and north is General Commercial(GC)District. The zoning of the properties to the south is Office/Professional(OP)District; C. The proposed project complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code except parking. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception request for consideration by the Planning Commission. The proposed project,otherwise,meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 2.exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302-Replacement or Reconstruction-as the proposal is to demolish an existing veterinary hospital of 3,068 square feet and construct a new veterinary hospital of 4,815 square feet with 895 square feet of retail space. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. • S. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Deoartment 1) Approval is for the demolition of an existing veterinarian office and construction of a new veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of 25,705 square feet in the General Commercial(GC) District located at 7289 Amethyst Avenue; APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, AND-20. 2) Proposed land uses requiring a Conditional Use Permit as identified in Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code,shall require a separate review and approval by the Planning Manager and/or Planning Commission prior to submittal of documents for plan check, issuance of a Business License, and building occupancy. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) An easement in favor of the property owner of the adjacent, vacant property to the east(APN: 0202-161-09)to allow use of the drive aisle along the north side of the new building in order to allow access to Amethyst Avenue shall be provided. Documents for this easement shall be submitted for review by the City and the easement recorded H, I.&J68 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909— NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 4 with the County of San Bemardino(and other agenciestenfifies as may be required)prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. 5) Downspouts shall not be visible from the exterior on any elevations of the building. All downspouts shall be routed through the interior of the building walls. 6) The output surface (face) of all lamp heads on wall-mounted light fixtures and the light standards shall be parallel to the ground in order to eliminate glare and minimize lighting on adjacent properties. The maximum height of light standards, including the base,measured from the finished surface is 15 feet. 7) The color scheme of the new building and the house (that will be converted to an office)shall match. This includes the color of the wood siding, the fascia boards, exposed rafters,beams,and the roofing tile. 8) The fenestration selections(doors and windows)shall be modified to reflect authentic Craftsman style architecture. 9) Wherever river rock is proposed it shall be real river rock and not a manufactured veneer. 10) Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along the structure at an equivalent of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. In addition,two trees shall be provided along the east side of the building. 11) Provide more elaborate, decorative ground cover and shrubs at the southwest comer of the site, near the intersection of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue. Landscape plans shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 12) Provide wood siding instead of decorative file features on either side of the west entrance to the retail space. 13) New walls,including retaining walls,shall be constructed of decorative masonry block such as slumpstone or stackstone or poured in-place concrete with design elements incorporated to match the buildings. 14) All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or a similarly dark color. 15) The vehicle entrance at Amethyst Avenue shall have decorative paving. This paving shall be behind the public right-of-way and shall extend from the front property line to the setback line and have a width equal to that of the driveway. The final design of the enhanced pavement including, but not limited to, concrete color and geometric dimensions,shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval. H, I,&J69 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL • January 22, 2014 Page 5 16) All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers, back-flow devices,etc.shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 17) All Double Detector Checks(DDC)and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened on three sides behind a 4-foot metal mesh fence. The equipment shall be painted dark green. 18) All doors(roll-up, dock doors, emergency access)shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall. 19) The trash enclosure shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosure shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. 20) All Conditions of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2009-00360 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697 shall apply. Engineering Department 1) Development Impact Fees due Prior to Building Permit Issuance (subject to change/ periodic increases). 2) Lot Merger of parcels#0202-161-11, 0202-161-10 & 0202-161-20 to be recorded prior to building permit issuance. 1 3) Vacate 10 feet of existing Base Line Frontage right-of-way prior to building permit issuance. 4) Reserve/provide joint access easement in favor of the property to the east(APN 0202-161-09)prior to building permit issuance. 5) Provide no stopping any time signs on Amethyst from Base Line to the site drive approach. Building and Safety Department—Grading 1) Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices.The Grading and Drainage Plan(s)shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2) A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the • State of California to perform such work.Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. H.I.&J70 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 6 3) A geologic report. shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4) The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5) A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6) The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a .dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit 7) If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that.plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit 8) A drainage study showing a 1 00-year,AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off- site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off- site drainage acceptance letter(s)from adjacent downstream property owner(s)or discharge flows in a natural condition(concentrated flows are not accepted) & shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s)to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 12) The Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail H,I,&J71 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL • January 22, 2014 Page 7 including gradients, elevations and dimensions and comply with the current adopted Califomia Building Code. 13) The Grading and Drainage Plan shall Implement City Standards for on- site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14) All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 15) Private sewer, water and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16) The maximum parking stall gradient is 5%. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the,current adopted California Building Code. 17) Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 18) The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a • minimum of 100-feet north of the project boundary. 19) The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 20) The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 21) Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WOMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 22) In all applicable sections shown on the Grading and Drainage Plan,call out the height on both sides of the wall and draw the section to scale. Note which side of the wall is the project side. 23) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16(Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit. • 24) An HCOC exists for the downstream receiving water.The downstream receiving water (Mill Creek, Prado Area) is experiencing significant degradation of its banks.The project must implement a volume-based treatment control BMP (retention/detention facility) on each lot. The H. IA J72 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 8 Storm Water Quality Management Plan and the grading plan must contain an appropriate volume based BMP prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 25) If more than 5,000 square feet of combined asphalt concrete and PCC parking and driveway surface area are removed, a Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP)will be required for this project.Contact the Building and Safety Department for additional directionfinformation. 26) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 27) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan"and the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 28) All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way(Baseline Avenue) must.drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 29) The precise grading .and drainage plan shall show the existing topography extending 100-feet north of and east of the respective property lines. 30) The precise grading and drainage plan submittal package must include a site demolition phasing plan and a site construction phasing plan for review and approval by the Building and Safety Official. In addition the plan submittal package must also include an"Ease Site Access"plan. 31) Prior to issuance of a grading permit,the precise grading and drainage plan must show all upstream off-site storm water flows have been accepted through the proposed block wall and properly conveyed to a downstream drainage facility. Fire Construction Services FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1) Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in commercialitindustrial projects is 300-feet. No portion of the exterior wall shall be located more than 150-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 100- feet. H,I,&J73 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL • January 22, 2014 Page 9 b. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: • At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. At intersections. • On the right side of the street,whenever practical and possible. • As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. • A minimum of forty-feet(40')from any building. c. If any portion of a facility or building is located more than 150-feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building,additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. d. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. FSC-2 Fire Flow 1) The required minimum fire flow for this project, when automatic fire ® sprinklers are installed is 1500 gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This flow reflects a 50-percent reduction for the installation of an approved automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 with central station monitoring. This requirement is made in accordance with the California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2) Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3) Fire protection water plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 4) On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600-feet of the proposed project site. FSC-3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 5) Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. • Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. H, I,&J74 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 10 FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 6) Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the2007 California Fire Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance FD46 and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System&Sprinkler Monitoring 7) The 2007 California Building Code, the RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard, Ordinance FD46 and/or the 2007 California Fire Code require fire sprinkler systems to be monitoring by Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system fire may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a building permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access 1) Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. 2) Location of Access: All portions of the structures 13t story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measure on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 3) Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26-feet b. The maximum inside tum radius shall be 24-feet c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50-feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45-feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14-feet, 6-inches. f. At any private entry median,the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20-feet.on each side. H,I,&J75 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL • January 22, 2014 Page 11 g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9-degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12%. i. Support a minimum load of 70,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14-feet, 6-inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 4) Access Doorways: Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage,access shall be provided in accordance with the 2001 California Building Code,Fire and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall • that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 5) Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 6) CommerciaUlndustrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS)for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock.The lock must be purchased at the-Fire Administration Office. H. I.&J76 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909_NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 12 If. -.Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a.visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates,a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices(TPD)are to be installed,the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7) Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 8) Approved Fire Departrnent Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy,of the approved .Alternative Method application, .if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9) Roof Access: There shall be a means of fine department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures with roofs less than 75' above the level of the fire access road. a.. This access must be reachable by either fire department ground ladders or by an aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features,or high parapets that inhibit roof access: c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. H, I,&J77 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL • January 22, 2014 Page 13 e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix A. h. A site plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that • may be hazardous to life or property. • Compressed Gases • Dry Cleaning Plants • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures FSC-12 Hazardous Materials - Submittal to Fire Construction Services Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the 2007 California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances FD46and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FCS-15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Chronoloaical Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS—Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply(Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit • construction plans,specifications,flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District H, I,&J78 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 14 Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building & Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation,witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped.. 2. Public Water Supply (DomestidFIm) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan,show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6"above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' "Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures". PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION—Please complete the following: H,I,&J79 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL ® January 22, 2014 Page 15 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on- site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,the fire sprinkler system(s)shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of • Occupancy,the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy,vehicular gates must be inspected,tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. • The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved. fire access H. I.&J80 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 16 roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information"form.This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fre Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 %" x 11" or 11" x 17" site plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The site plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of January 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: H,I,&J81 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-05 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909--NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL. January 22, 2014 ® Page 17 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: H. I,&J82 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEW STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT M DRC2008-00909 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 7289 AMETHYST AVENUE/7271 AMETHYST AVENUE LOCATION: APN: 0202-161-10, -11, AND -20 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Comoletlon Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14.05 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption -$50 X 1 H, I,&J83 i Project No. DRC2008-00909 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading,• tree removal, encroachment,building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, t, approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall __J _ be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. 9. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of(the shopping center/ther p oJect). DRC2008-00909StdCond.doc 2 H. I.&J84 Project No. DRC2008-00909 Completion Date b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll-up doors. e. Trash bins with counter-weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 2. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 3. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 4. Signs shall be conveniently posted for "no overnight parking" and for "employee parking only." 5. All operations and businesses shall be conducted to comply with the following standards which shall be incorporated into the lease agreements for all tenants: a. Noise Level - All commercial activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 65 dB during the hours of 10 p.m..until 7 a.m. and 70 dB during the hours of 7 a.m. until 10 p.m. b. Loading and Unloading- No person shall cause the loading, unloading, opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. unless otherwise specified herein, in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to a residential area. E. Building Design 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be.buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). DRC2008-00909StdCond.doc 3 H,I,&J85 Project No. DRC2008-00909 Completion Date 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. All parking spaces shall be double per striped P P City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 2. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and / /— other non-residential development. H. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050,.and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. • 3. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 —/ ! percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees -24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. --- 6. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 7. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. — I. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. • DRC2008-00909StdCond.doc 4 H, I,&J86 Project No. DRC2008-00909 Completion Date J. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). K. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions !/_ 1. . Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., DRC2008-00909) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and 1 a soils report. Architecfs/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation I I coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2008-00909). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. DRC2008-00909StdCond.doc 5 H,I,&J87 Project No. DRC2008-00909 Completion Date 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project ® or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 5. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public / counter). New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC . • 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 6. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, • stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. DRC2008-00909StdCond.doc 6 H. I.&J88 Project No. DRC2008-00909 Completion Date THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR.COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. I_I N. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements shall be constructed to City Standards. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees (a) (b) Base Line Road X X X X X X X Amethyst Avenue X X X Notes: (a) Comply with the City "Major Arterial' standards; (b) Relocate Ex. Traffic signal(s), signing and striping; (c) Remove and replace. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City / Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with I_I adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. DRC2008-00909StdCond.doc 7 H,I,&J89 Project No. DRC2008-00909 Completion Date 4. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows: • a. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvements plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. O. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and —/—/— Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. P. Utilities 1. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. /— Q. General Requirements and Approvals 41 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into —� one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. 2. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for —� all new street lights for the first 6 months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 3. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees —� shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the. Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: R. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle /— power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, �— with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. The lighting shall be consistent around • the entire development. 3. The lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. /—/— DRC2008-00909StdCond.doc 8 H. I,&J90 Project No. DRC2008-00909 Completion Date S. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. DRC2008-00909StdCond.doc 9 H,l,&J91 RESOLUTION NO. 14-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA,APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2009-00360,A REQUEST FOR A 25 PERCENT REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR A PROPOSED NEW VETERINARIAN OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL RETAIL BUILDING ON A PROPERTY OF ABOUT 25,705 SQUARE FEET IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL(GC)DISTRICT LOCATED AT 7289 AMETHYST AVENUE; THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES INCORPORATING AN EXISTING RESIDENCE TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE AT 7271 AMETHYST AVENUE AS PART OF THE PROJECT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APNS: 0202-161-10,-11, AND-20. A. Recitals. 1. Nassef Eskander, on behalf of Alta Loma Animal Hospital, filed an application for the issuance of Minor Exception DRC2009-00360, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 22nd day of January 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on January 22, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a project site located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue; b. The project site is comprised of three(3)parcels with a combined area of 25,705(0.59- acre)with overall dimensions of about 158 feet(north-south)and about 165 feet(east-west); C. The project site is developed with four(4)structures. Two(2)buildings of 2,308 and 760 square feet are generally located at the south side of the project site and are occupied by the Alta Loma Animal Hospital(addressed as 7289 Amethyst Avenue). The other two(2)buildings are a single- family residence of 745 square feet and a garage of 201 square feet, and are generally located at the northwest comer of the project site. The single-family residence(addressed as 7271 Amethyst Avenue and known as the Bennett House)is a potential local landmark per the City's Local Inventory of Historic • Resources; H, I,&J92 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-06 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2009-00360—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 2 d. To the north are single-family residences while to the south,across Base Line Road,is a senior assisted living facility operated by Sunrise Senior Living. To the west,across Amethyst Avenue, is a commercial/office building and a single-family residence. The property to the east is vacant; e. The zoning of the project site and the properties to the east,west,and north is General . Commercial(GC)District. The zoning of the properties to the south is Office/Professional(OP)District; f. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception for a 25 percent reduction in the number of parking stalls that are necessary to fulfill the parking requirement for this project; g. Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code,the parking calculations for the proposed project are as follows: Type of Use Floor Parking Number of Spaces Number of Spaces Area SF Ratio Required Provided Veterinary Hospital 4,815 1%200 24 Retail 895 1/250 4 Office(converted Single- 745 1/250 3 Family Residence Total 6,455 31 24 h. Only twenty-four(24) parking stalls are proposed — the result is a deficiency of seven(7)parking stalls; i. The presence of the existing,single-family residence at the northwest comer of the project site significantly limits the size of the parking lot. This structure is a potential local landmark that has a value and benefit to the surrounding community and the City prefers that the structure be protected: j. Options for constructing additional parking elsewhere on the site are limited due to the size and overall dimensions of the project site. The parking lot as proposed is the largest it could reasonably be without eliminating amenities such as the trash enclosure and/or reducing landscaping. k. Reducing the floor area of the proposed building would make it impractically small and negate the purpose of the applicant's project,i.e.replacement of the existing veterinary hospital with a larger veterinary hospital; I. The Minor Exception, if approved, will result in a reduction in`the parking requirement from thirty-one(31)parking stalls to twenty-three(23)parking stalls(0.25 x 31 =8;31 - 8 =23). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: H,I,&J93 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-06 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2009-00360— NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL ® HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 3 a. That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the General Plan and intent of the Development Code. b. That there are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. C. That the strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by other property owners in the same district. d. That the granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of a special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district,and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302-Replacement or Reconstruction-as the proposal is to demolish an existing veterinary hospital of 3,068 square feet and • construct a new veterinary hospital of 4,815 square feet with 895 square feet of retail space. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3,and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a 25 percent reduction in the required parking for a proposed new veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of about 25,705 square feet in the General Commercial(GC) District located at 7289 Amethyst Avenue-APNs: 0202-161-10, -11, AND-20. 2) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code,Etiwanda Specific Plan,State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 3) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2008-00909 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. H. I.&194 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-06 MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2009-00360—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairwoman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of January 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: H, I,&J95 i RESOLUTION NO. 14-07 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2009-00697,A PROPOSED UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2008-00909, A PROPOSED VETERINARIAN OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL RETAIL BUILDING ON A PROPERTY OF ABOUT 25,705 SQUARE FEET IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 7289 AMETHYST AVENUE; THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES INCORPORATING AN EXISTING RESIDENCE TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE AT 7271 AMETHYST AVENUE AS PART OF THE PROJECT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0202-161-10, -11, AND-20. A. Recitals. 1. Nassef Eskander,on behalf of Alta Loma Animal Hospital,filed an application for the approval of Uniform Sign Program DRC2009-00697 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Uniform Sign Program request is referred to as"the application." 2. On the 22nd day of January 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW,THEREFORE,it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals,Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 22, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a project site located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Base Line Road and Amethyst Avenue; b. The project site is comprised of three(3)parcels with a combined area of 25,705(0.59- acre)with overall dimensions of about 158 feet(north-south) and about 165 feet(east-west); C. The project site is developed with four(4) structures. Two (2) buildings of 2,308 and 760 square feet(identified as Buildings 1 and 2 for clarity)are generally located at the south side of the project site and are occupied by the Alta Loma Animal Hospital(addressed as 7289 Amethyst Avenue). The other two (2) buildings are a single-family residence (Building 3) of 745 square feet and a garage (Building 4)of 201 square feet and are generally located at the northwest corner of the project site. The single-family residence (addressed as 7271 Amethyst Avenue and known as the Bennett House) is a potential local landmark per the City's Local Inventory of Historic Resources. The majority of the site in the vicinity of the buildings used by the veterinarian hospital is paved with asphalt; • d. To the north are single-family residences while to the south,across Base Line Road,is a senior assisted living facility operated by Sunrise Senior Living. To the west,across Amethyst Avenue, is a commercial/office building and a single-family residence. The property to the east is vacant; H. I.&J96 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-07 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2009-00697—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL January 22, 2014 Page 2 e. The zoning of the project site and the properties to the east,west,and north is General Commercial(GC)District. All of the aforementioned residences are classified as"legal,non-conforming" structures as they are within a commercial zone. The zoning of the properties to the south is Office/Professional (OP) District; f. The applicant proposes a sign program comprised of a combination of a monument sign and wall signs for the building addresses of each tenant space and tenant identification; g. These signs are typical for commercial buildings; h. The potential size, location, and placement of the signs will be integrated and compatible with the architecture of the building and the site; i. This application is in conjunction with Development Review DRC2008-00909 and Minor Exception DRC2009-00360. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Uniform Sign Program is consistent with the development standards for signs as provided in Chapter 17.74—Sign Regulations for Private Property, b. The design, location,and scale of proposed signs for the integrated development are in keeping with the architectural character of the development. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 2 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15302-Replacement or Reconstruction-as the proposal is to demolish an existing veterinary hospital of 3,068 square feet and construct a new veterinary hospital of 4,815 square feet with 895 square feet of retail space. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Approval is for a proposed Uniform Sign Program for Development Review DRC2008-00909, a proposed veterinarian office and commercial retail building on a property of about 25,705 square feet in the General Commercial(GC)District located at 7289 Amethyst Avenue;APN: 0202- 161-10, -11, and-20. 2) The applicant shall submit a final draft of the Uniform Sign Program for the City's records prior to issuance of building permits. The final draft shall include all applicable technical corrections/revisions as described in the Design Review Committee's action/comments report for the Design Review Committee meeting held on August 17, 2010. All signs shall require review and approval of a separate Sign Permit application by the Planning Manager prior to installation: H,I,&J97 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-07 UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2009-00697—NASSEF ESKANDER FOR ALTA LOMA ANIMAL HOSPITAL • January 22, 2014 Page 3 3) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2008-00909 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of • January 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: H, I,&J98 STAFF REPORT PLANNINGDEPARTMEN r Date: January 22, 2014 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 - BIANE BUSINESS PARK-A request to modify the Biane Winery, a complex comprised of fifteen (15) buildings/structures and three (3) single-family residences located on two (2) parcels with a combined area of 10.41 acres by demolishing the existing Bottling Plant/Warehouse and Dry Wine Bottling Room and constructing an industrial warehouse building of 122,304 square Z within the General Industrial (GI) District, located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues - APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Related file: Tree Removal Permit DRC2013- 00475 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00475 - BIANE BUSINESS PARK - A request to • remove 24 trees related to Development Review DRC2007-00951 for a 6.51 gross acres site within the General Industrial Development District, located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues-APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review DRC2007-00951 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00475 by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Residential— Low Medium (LM) and the Santa Fe Railway South - Industrial/Commercial Buildings -General Industrial (GI) East - Industrial/Commercial Buildings -General Industrial (GI) West - Industrial/Commercial Buildings -General Industrial (GI) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - General Industrial (GI) North - Low Medium (LM) South - General Industrial (GI) East - General Industrial (GI) West - General Industrial (GI) C. Site Characteristics: The site is a winery complex comprised of fifteen (15) • buildings/structures (two of which are on separate parcels outside of the project area), Item K&L1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00951 AND DRC2013-00475- BIANE BUSINESS PARK January 22, 2014 Page 2 associated equipment, and three (3) single-family residences located on two (2) parcels with a combined area of 10.41 acres. The site, known as the Biane Winery, is located on the south side of Eighth Street between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The winery was formerly known as the Padre Winery (State Primary Number 36-016423). The winery was previously determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) in 2001 by a consensus through the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 process (California Historical Resource Status Code 2S2). The fifteen (15) buildings and structures consist of the winery building, bottling plant/warehouse, grape crushing building and grape pits, distillery and shops, bonded warehouse, sherry room, dry wine bottling, winemaker's residence, office/caretaker residence, a restroom, cooperage shop, foreman's residence, chemical room, and a lunch shelter. The site is a rectangular configuration consisting of two separate parcels. Dimensions north to south run approximately 568 feet and 856 feet running east to west. Most of the northern portion of the site is occupied by winery buildings. Currently, the winery is used as an industrial/commercial complex. To the south, east, and west are existing industrial/commercial buildings. To the north is the Santa Fe Railway and residential development north of the tracks. A rail line runs north to south just west of the project site. There is also an extant railroad spur line that runs along the frontage which will not be substantially removed or paved over as part of this project. This spur line was historically used for shipping the completed products along the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway alignment that runs east to west along the north side of Eighth Street. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The project was first introduced in 2007. The initial proposal was a complete demolition of all buildings on-site and to construct a 239,370 square foot industrial warehouse building. The Biane Winery is considered a "historical resource" for the purposes of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and thus triggered the requirement for preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) because of the unavoidable impacts to cultural resources. About halfway through the EIR process, the applicant considered an alternative project description that would result in the demolition of two district contributors (Bottling Plant/Warehouse and Dry Wine Bottling Room) and preservation/continued adaptive reuse of the significant structures identified as contributors. A.cultural impacts assessment was performed by LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) to review the revised project. Although LSA found potential impacts, these impacts were analyzed for significance and mitigated to a level that is less-than-significant. B. Project Description: The revised project encompasses 6.51 of the 10.41 acres. The project is a partial-build option that would result in demolition of several buildings within the 6.51 acres, including the Bottling Plant/Warehouse, the Dry Wine Bottling Room, cooperage shop, restroom, lunch shelter, and foreman's residence buildings to construct a 122,304 square- foot industrial warehouse building. The eastern portion of the site (3.9 acres) is not part of this project. The cooperage shop, foreman's residence, restroom, and lunch shelter are found to be non-contributors to the historic winery (Exhibit B). The demolition of the two contributors (Bottling Plant/Warehouse and the Dry Wine Bottling Room)will be mitigated to a level that is less-than-significant. The other two winery residences will be relocated to an off- Item K&L2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00951 AND DRC2013-00475- BIANE BUSINESS PARK January 22, 2014 Page 3 site location. Potential impacts and mitigations to cultural resources were analyzed in the Initial Study Part II. C. Site Improvements: As part of this approval, street improvements will be made to bring the site into conformance with the current requirements of the General Industrial Development District. The applicant will be required to install frontage improvements such as curb adjacent sidewalk and street trees and place the existing overhead utilities underground. The existing historic spur line that runs along the north perimeter of the property will be protected in place when installing public improvements within the right-of-way. Engineering special conditions of approval are noted in the Resolution of Approval. The eastern portion of the site is not part of this project and is not subject to improvements at this time. Additionally, there will be a lot line adjustment to reconfigure the existing lots so that the old and new portions of the site are on separate parcels. D. Parking: The entire development provides 98 parking spaces. The minimum required parking spaces is 79; 19 spaces above the minimum requirement. There are 21 (14 feet by 50 feet) and (12 feet by 53 feet) trailer stalls. Office(4 spaces/1,000 sq.ft.) 7,500 30 30 Warehouse/Storage (1st 20,000 sq.ft.@ 1 space/1,000 sq.ft.) 20,000 20 20 (Next 20,000 sq. ft. @ 1 space/2,000 sq.ft.) 20,000 10 48 (Remaining sq.ft. @ 1 space/4,000 sq.ft. 74,804 19 0 Total Required Parking Spaces 78 Total Provided Parking Spaces 98 E. Tree Removal Permit: Included with the project is a request to remove 24 trees (DRC2013- 00475). The tree removals are necessary in order to construct the industrial building and related parking. There are also non-heritage trees on-site, such as citrus trees, smaller trees less than 20 inches in diameter and vines. Non-heritage trees are exempt from a Tree Removal Permit and the City does not have mitigations for removing vines. However, staff is recommending that the applicant offer the vines to any interested members of the public for the opportunity to replant them to an off-site location. The 24 heritage trees proposed for removal are required to be replanted on a one-to-one basis. A greater number of trees will be replanted in the parking lot area and around the perimeter of the project. F. Rail Spur Easement: Section 17.36.040 (D)(6) of the Development Code requires all properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines to provide rail service access. The applicant has provided an area for the proposed rail spur easement. However, it does not meet the City's Development Code minimum standard of 32 feet. The applicant has provided a letter outlining their discussion with a Railroad Engineer Consultant and how the 20 feet more than meets railway design standards. This item was brought up at the April 30, 2013, Design Review Committee (DRC) meeting; the DRC was favorable to accepting the letter as adequate. G. Cultural Impacts Assessment & Landmark Designation: When a structure is designated as a ® local historic landmark, the City has authority for discretionary review of future exterior improvements. To ensure that the winery will not yield to piecemeal improvements in the Item K&L3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00951 AND DRC2013-00475- BIANE BUSINESS PARK January 22, 2014 Page 4 future, potentially affecting the eligibility of the winery for the National Register of Historic Places, staff is requesting that a landmark designation be required as part of the Condition of Approval for this project. H. Land Use Compatibility: The project site is located within the General Industrial Development District which permits warehouse and office use. The surrounding properties include typical industrial-related uses such as an upholstery business, food processing, warehousing/storage, and residential development just north of the railroad tracks. The proposed project is consistent with its land use designation. I. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger) on April 30, 2013. The main topics of discussion were in regards to the mural detailing on the north elevation, the rail spur easement along the west side of the building, and providing more articulation along the east elevation (Exhibit C). The DRC directed the applicant to work with staff on making the necessary revisions and recommended approval to be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. The applicant has worked with staff and has made all of the requested changes. J. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by the Committees on April 30, 2013. The Committees recommended approval of the project without changes. K. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, green house gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, noise, land use and planning, and population and housing, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. The City received one comment from the California Department of Transportation in regards to the Transportation section of the Initial Study on July 15, 2013. There was concern that the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) referenced in the Initial Study was from 2008 and Caltrans could not review the TIA until a new TIA was submitted. However, the 2008 TIA was based off of the first proposal which proposed a much larger building (239,370 square feet). The current proposal is now 122,304 square feet and about half in size. Because the project has been reduced in size, there will be less trips generated due to the smaller-scaled project and therefore reduced impacts to traffic. Staff advised the applicant to contact Caltrans to review the revised Trip Generation memorandum. On December 20, 2013, staff received a letter from Caltrans stating that they have reviewed the revised Trip Generation memorandum and there are no other pending issues (Exhibit E). CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Item K&L4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2007-00951 AND DRC2013-00475 - BIANE BUSINESS PARK January 22, 2014 Page 5 Respectfully submitted, i C- (" Candyce Burne Planning Manager CB:MN/Is Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Map showing Contributing/Non-Contributing Buildings Exhibit C - Design Review Action Comments, dated April 30, 2013 Exhibit D - Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Exhibit E - Letter from Caltrans dated December 20, 2013 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2007-00951 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00475 Item K&L5 1 i 1 EIGHT STREET i .�. 1 ���� 0000 0000 ��F..� g ��_r H PA I 60.600 SF. Y Cy' I I II ! 1 r BIANE WINERY BVILDI -- �122,304�S.F. w � ? I I I I _ �' EIQSTWO BULDWQ 16.110 S.F. FU p I L `�. •� � _ _ BUWEBUSINESS 3 t PARK -T -T p IN Is are ww IMrrares -- - arE LE000 ccoe~04 wcrrrr u v ueu�nna O a�;rr .°`wr.,`w"ra,a. •.o<..m... .f"".�^T` .�o{.v-i „'� , Lj ., ' :�, _` ..r.�i.. rr�'. nr�.a wr�..r .rnivaa ooaea. v r w. _r ` g1U,ECT KzgM O��:���•���:��rs�� � 07':'»'^,.:., a- w..r. ^ r ,.w ..c>�u.i ,.ar.�.>a a ,,,m,.,.,,x ,. n aoa r�r..• pn �w j� —� I�TTi � A'b ftoA Ngro Zwrp ws Oc riCTs Ma�v a��� (�•sw w...ww�...oa,once � or rm .���m w mon ou�wr. rarraa cera rri M r➢T lM lrlrw r rt. ...� y Oom®t ww r ri rsa�r�d r•ra�T� •.nh----ffi a�...aam pOH�W a Qre racer..ua I�>tri Q arra�.uotw.wY rorwm w_o•rrs ,�® rar.a11a�a rai a�Yl� ^+r ii.xT , O rte•4 woe u.i+m.u.i•r 41 yair a r.rrr ice♦wau. � .Kar arYra rrw irr rau Yw 0 wr ru arrr awrrraa wrr rrrri►O Q uaw dor.r�wwr.r sotva.v ultra v• a�Ylal PLANTING LEGEND ��fYY1 ROfWCY/tO.rO=R.< 98 9000000000 L--------------- a6 (D L �-'�7 L IIII -711 -r- U I I I I I I I I I I ,.: , � , '.00YWYR Vw a�rwY R 1q.ruM fMM�IT W� -III RfrD4�J'up 6 amr.+u a I _�VL�rJ<�+�N�YY RL W w11.WW vu� .. u.a G]<a••M OJ.rRl1 OJIfl.. _.YYV(QORYIQ 1]J (� Business Park p DRC3007 o51 Bione Business Pari Biane Winery BUNTER LANDSCAPE - /n Ja J.r.Harr n.ceJnr,u w/o = � : Rancho Cucamonga.Cokfoawa H PA � f OOf811 �n Mae wilt U>wilt — � owwt. .� 1fY1pK Ilt r ro.f•w..� A A ° "Killsi !_ f Y 41IE- '46 ._ » • _ I 1. _ 1� — ! ! r r In l o f 1 f I BIANE WINERY t* DID 4. a 1 A fif tllilWf BUILDING I BIANEBUSINESS D {! ! !L199 f PARK 1122,304 wm K 220$4 S.F. r ! D ! ! ! f f..f r ' r I I I 00 R R OVIIIIIALL • — � — _ ___ f„n,ulilnn. B iavrohs-.Loonn.w Qwa No1F5-Roa+niw I O� o w r+a a NCnI.rn wLL wwa w I I w�.K !IL .w. aa �-� A2. 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 0OHPA o 00 Oo 000 po ,r n �!. ir�in UHL- L11 1� 00 n0 00 O o0 00 m O O O 000 Or p O Oo O po E. On K om o 0o m o0 0 o mBLANE WINERY O © O O p i L w t w 4-1 1;-___I 16—A 1�_L_�MT�L 9 L__'TL BIANE BUSINESS PARK 00 0 00 0 0 00o m 00 0 00 o 00 00 om •• o 0 0 ' 0 00 © 0 0 no o� 0 00 00 0 00 NIA •� .'��'''■ n'?Sri a6'�ti�i�a10'�i�i?A 4►�` �ii" ��i. Roi�i r 6 ACaf:�i�. ',•. s. iti A r�aas os• �� ao'as �urt sos.:as 'qs � 11/•■■ fa aF.3'YV AYaS Kt '8•-':� Y "rah• b• '6Ot 1R ssr r arr .Ys ,w a. .ee:sa rs � �11..■I ■I 11 �I — F� i= �'rloty�c�'a+�.��iww's'�' _ ■1i�ri .a�� ,�ij�.9 �I i%II�I:Y.■ - �•■ R1,.'lia4.■tY -- - - - - -.- - � A,^II//1 �LS� .� I _ ..�;.',� �.._J •.e. -it:�4 - ;>`� `°� "` ..'�i��'?►�►-i^�:$?_'R�@�t���4��4'��.w����.rll/t_ II i4RA���_:/� om Oo mo 6w-da- mo G' 00 00 om o0 m a m o !y m _ O 0 0:• e 0 0 > N 1 Y 5 a4¢ W s Z cr TE �a� a Lit E R• ► E ' 3aed a r (ill 1.4 g. t11 0 y qqi y • 1 fYAW701 _ i � � O rt t GGG E 3 u u a . +r Qi� �llr A 1 a r`.GX.✓r:X,e �k. 9���Ei1�� d �i���i9r. e 10 Seca 0 -)Oo Itam ICR,I 1(1 FRA EE ZEE e FRAZEE CL 2 33M CL 2964M 646 A CLp24D A—diz d 11 ctlw 0 Carolina Rubble Whit. Johnston Bonaparte Hash Hurd ©© MULLION GLAZWI it,3autbta T N O R T H E L E V A T I O N 20 a W E S T E L E V A T I O N Addxxu,a eM r Aadmw r L�sr Addlt d PocC au hlcda4xxi� �D--uw P, Addilxm ul W.II S<<,nic1 - w — — E A S T E L E V A T I O N BIANE BUSINESS PARK RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA {' NO R T H E L E V A T I O N W E S T E L E V A T I O N 3Al 20 SOUTH E L E V A T I O N Addx un,� 5 A"t-4 L,g Adda—(J PrOL"Mcdalbcm............ DttI1ra1M RYS r a l E A S T E L E V A T I O N B I A N E BUSINESS PARK 13 RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA I I �uIL W/TF3 papular Moria: _ r1e1■Apt ■ I ��r" .."'o'rwea.o�.em�rn°�mr..�nai��rr i�w"w.... �nor v._`a`���w mri°'r"s::w�a_:.' o�ive.u�,�"'••r��a'rii ioi oo'.r.n a ..r r. o.. LMMlOfif�110N HPA WH1'S._��..�' ..r I 7KANCHO MMtlAL NOTEMY or A� ■ .rt.:w v WCAMON[.A o.� .. ... I .....oa;sM.a ;:n.�u.i i.:..i,�„mio`o'• :« MML� a wen•a�o�r rea.Lmmlaw OF w :pFxK4w � VICINITY YAP I .r..o......m.w... s. ws.�.r.�. ..wwe.�r..w i'tol¢t I .o..r e..r s,�..s,...............,_... ME MGM%wart r-h I � I jOL IAPPLW W Wic"mGIY T T ---- 1 Lamm ■ C,n,...1..,,. �:..,.. � l 1 -- -- Imo_WA rcrmatn�utawe I all�eairaL 1681101! I -- I _ _T c-a i NHEEr a-' , 1�F3 {a 1MZ r J --1 ----- L W sOlWliiMi•1 ETc I I I I`� �� ■ 1— TRIS 9ffT I 1 ---I- ----------------�1 I � HATCH LEGEND �w L-----------------L----------------J I woc 1w I I ml mlar T11®NM I I w .. I C-1 I DRC2DO7-MSI MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C-2 I 111 o E: }o4w Ok I M. HPA < r I rt— r — — — — — L m I — - I I 1 rib ■ 0�. w.= � w Y I , N' t i /- 4ro I I I ' rro�rwwrs �Y K. .RY / I'� � I W ■ (.. !. \ u -`-'. �� _ r-. '.1 �' — ✓/�7� I U) WJE BLONA SPARK 4 1) J 20 9! Qvi COMRJOLM ', i r '•r .. _ I [L�(I7NA1L^AIlf5,Q6. ----------- MWEPTUAL UPADW I I a.w I I �I I I I LEGEND HATCH LEGEND MRIMnp .,.....,. ........ iu i y f , I .. C-4 DRCINT-OOOI MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C-3 I � �— � T _ T � � � � � l r. � r>• �I �®�� TIT R� T � r. RRA � � � � � � Rr� T RRRI � t-- - ------- ------- HPA ' ! I 1 ... . OW=yr nc 1 i � rn�ilnrtRr I 1 :J , IrW URIs h 1�14 i _ {wil OWE BU91E'a5 PNi( I i J 1 is c m we I i 11 - 11 A?` qv ■ I I I 1 I a. ol.s II I I I I I � LEGEND HATCH LEGEND MRII� �.. �.a-nom• I C-5 ■ 8TH STREET HPA rr�ra.�.rw• y .. s.• �, aw .t M1�na SECTION A SECTION r g ■ �... MAW WoRmul =a~ "am PWO— ��� wE aus�ss w�wc Ammar f SECTION C SECTION ■ �C cni ca mik= SECTION �-. u: oEuasNoscnaws '�•��L–arsrar..�•a.i•-- - ori#W' '� i�itir-ue urcw riaaruw�irannu !'r"��' ,tel ami r:\ cuwx v:u�Umrx-uaxw[e DETAIL E SECTION ;p G C-6 a+QW-O sI I I ■ I ;CRM MACK HDA T -— 8TH STREET I , 1 r.cr v ° INE "A' 14 r� AREA 10 E II-STWO AS 910x1 - ------ I wao aanm i _ Clvraa: 1 1 � 1 �0 IlMmsr r , — — LINE W f•_ 1 . . 0.39 ACRE PRET _ - . ueaereortanw ..--- Pmtat £ DE ENTK V lE efnON MYSTEM"a 33 L ,. ffllltl � f1IT111 / wr.o.. aoa�l. I It Goll cm �M p R !''. i �m cwsnlc uw+o�ocMrs i-GMM WALLaxran�A 9°C woom LINE 'C'- I - LINE •8 era ----- IA' LINE D" ...... . .0 „ 1 k .... 11 LINE 'C' Via I I ----------- ......-. .. S101W MAN PUN I v.au I I I I I I I I I I C-7 ORC2007-00951 iseoo-coor�ao i I I I I I I I I a�a m � I nr �.�e wio s eo usva i ex I I ■swim W41A Fm= r wln� � , 1, � �` •e`�in I M �►e'swvtvvbo to t N I � 7041�0�N!J I Y • I I � �uRd63� T�.�.v�dQ'S7Q I A1Vd 883NB(1B 3" — ----------tea,.. iawxu r A� �� I =Uro I ■ I I I I I I r.r.�rsN r�a.a WI NN.I w'h VdHI I f: HPA r. .. I I aaw rr.• a -j s w - L°A' l ______----------- 18' _ ___ ___1B STORM Dit 4fi exc INc• I I. E)US➢NG EXISTINGBULOM BE REWWD 1 °' i•r ■ . t y1�NG•c CxjI TING u,LuING O.orr I 111 ---- ----- - - ---- P� G m • •v i a ... ` B rl.wwr t p� +. I I I i I EXLS1YiG r_ i ew, ,a ■ x 11 74 STOPM 4R1- F ' 1 611E 8I1®F38 P11R1 'klxrC:1�U PROPOSED UK BUILDNG E)OSDNG SP rr ,, r I , — ,D ExISnNG; I �t BT,lIkpING /� 1 I 3 I I NONE --- - - ' a ; ------------ ----------- __ _ __ _ I tl I Aaat I c�■m" EASING V I ERSTING r I BUILDING FP'W i \ PiC LP LMI N E y i a ps El70�5InyNryG� '>� 7 i q a a ar. yt;Nty OkAIN 24"STORM i � i _I,�.\ •sr.rx,u i� � � EIp5i1NG l _. v.r•.. / Ib'%+�tN DRA.N ' i BULDWG ■ I 1 �./ ...of __ __- F .�' - --�- r.e ry � r �ys 'sr"I.r;\, r•:,rlc..�arawr I ' .. - -- .: -t'►'4 .r �'� vw a a DPAKIM II .l+•.5 a'wa. Grp I CCI: TOW4 .` r 6.aa•.. u.•Sdd •. , _ I ![°.lW wnar .erW e.sar ror ewsrr c.r �'e:s� ,- Exlsnhc I I BULDINc -------------------------' ---------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I E#JtTTITYM ■m uAcTP@cm W Ta VATM TOMpE ,...a ,�::�'� ..a..m.,.®.o...,.r .... ��.� ,.'."'«„-,: ,.. �.►� "' ,... ter.. � e W_. w +� I ,:� 9.x!1 N'•M:s s!,a rare a Iror.n ru, C-9 ORCM7-O YST BTN STREET - - _._ _ •• __ _, ..nom —. ; - �.Y- - ,...:._ ....."`.,.�-�' -F Qac�,�Y- sYf.,ra•. wwn A I — - -••• -- ;hil °c .+ _ -� -y�- _a -' BMP MAINTENANCE REWIREHENTS. MAINIENANCF a w....a...........�r.a ( INSPECTION. I f �� r ./ ___'�� w+aao,n�.--'�Pt'3• �L: - f V"040T A PARA u r 1 4-`....a , a.' - J ' } r�. �: I �I1111�I I�� - ___ .-.F���( - i •'j CLEANING wr�,ir�:w�ss'wa 7 T, i -r I� '.. ggow�°°ntrr� L '• '��\�. -����.y+•r ��•.ems 20 TT _ . . T ------------------------------------------- -WOW SY57EM PLAN-MEW 11 � 6 ®fCl'tJOliSl1LTAMS,flit.'. Rwy�-r�.www WRl I�RY.CY TYPICAL BMP CROSS SECTION ~~a !+ TYPICAL BMP CROSS SECTION SYSTEM NO.2 SYSTEM NO.t WOW BMP EXHOT PIAN .n.w.w�ww.�,..R...a�... I I I HPA -(� R/R TRACK 8TH ST. -- own= — I( \ ----- ------ -- - - u I i Ll I -------- --- -- pp LU f 1NIE BIIBTM PAIS( W civiicamA= � I I Un -.- , -. .-_ ate_ ___..- -r�--•.T_•'., ' �\ /. I ! I" ' l� I� � A fCI mra7lSUAs,YC. .� 11 -------------- , 1 ► .. . ( I I � , I MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C-5 LEGEND HATCH LEGEND fAw rmwcm 9TH NTMU TNS NOTA: t � •� © �.,�.. .o.... .rt �.r��wp[vus5 rs�r,wr .a w.� I .•n,.:ma rr .........wow.. I C-3 I ORC2007-00961 I ' ■ i I ' HPA R R TRACK I .. tia __ .. ,:<.. � • � �8TH ST.' - --,` `._ -_-__ •_-- � cru "°°,.a•.,o. +�'I - +-�-i'� � w _—__—__ _____—__—__—__—__—,._ Yt IAwl CD AL -III 0 Alop on 4 w ewE asW-ss ww co IA - - W I f I i s •o!u ~ t 1sLL Cmi u—m� 7C p a 4 q \ ' s•, d 1,y L �. -r,� -•- --•---•---•- .��� 4t. ,.off; �: = , 14 Aw .1 I MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET C-4 I I LEGEND HA ICH LEGENp Womo M( fM gTmu 7 wm DRC2007-00951'- C-2 M x ti Y Y 1� - 1 '� 13 6 NOT A 4 PART 9 u ' 5 4 N 10 w .. Aw AA Fen-- r L- LSA PROJECT BOUNDARY 1 WINERY BUILDING 5 BONDED WAREHOUSE 9 OFFICE/CARETAKER RESIDENCE 13 CHEMICAL ROOM FIGURE 2 BOTTLING PLANT CONTRIBUTOR 2 AND WAREHOUSE G SHERRY ROOM 10 RESTROOM 14 LUNCH SHELTER NON-cowizBUTOR TO BE RELOCATED OFF-SITE 3 GRAPE CRUSHING BUILDING 7 DRY WINE BOTTLING 11 COOPERAGE SHOP® AND GRAPE PITS Biane Winery TO BE DEMOLISHED Impacts Assessment SOURCE'AhPhMM1SA,2W7:Ciry of Rmch.Cucanwga 4 DISTILLERY AND SHOPS 8 WINE MAKER'S RESIDENCE 12 FOREMANS RESIDENCE 1:�.CRG0901\RepoaACulmnNmpotla�6g2_Cmtrihulommxd(0526,09) Aerial Showing Contributors and Non-contributors DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mayuko Nakajima April 30, 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 — BIANE BUSINESS PARK -A request to demolish a portion of the Biane Winery (40,300 square feet of the Bottling Plant/Warehouse and Dry Wine Bottling Room) and to construct a 122,304 square foot industrial warehouse building on 6.51 acres at the existing Biane Winery site within the General Industrial District, located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues -APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. Design Parameters: The site is a 10.41-acre winery complex, also known as the Biane Winery, located on the south side of Eighth Street between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues. The site is within the General Industrial (GI) Development District. The winery (formerly Padre Winery, State Primary Number 36-016423) is composed of 15 buildings/structures (two are on separate parcels outside the project area), associated equipment, and three, single-family residences. The winery was previously determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places (National Register) in 2001 by a consensus through the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 process (California Historical Resource Status Code 2S2). The applicant is proposing a Lot Line Adjustment, the demolition of the Bottling Plant/Warehouse and Dry Wine Bottling Room buildings, and to construct a 122,304 square-foot industrial warehouse building on 6.51 acres. The eastem portion of the site is not a part of this project. The project is a partial-build option that would result in the demolition of the two buildings and relocation of two winery residences to an off-site location. • Proiect Description and Architectural Design: The proposed building will be located along the western portion of the site as a stand alone building adjacent to the Biane Winery. Since its in submittal in 2007, the project has been revised numerous times. After a cultural resource assessment was conducted, the applicant decided to revise the project to minimize the impacts as much as possible. The project will retain and preserve a majority of the contributing features that comprise the Biane Winery. Potential impacts to remove the contributing features will be mitigated to a level that is less-than-significant for the purposes of CEQA. Since its re-design, the applicant has been working with staff to incorporate as many elements to the project to enhance the historic winery theme through the Design Review process. The historic winery theme has been honored through the incorporation of materials to the industrial . building that compliment the Biane Winery building. Trellis enhancements, recesses, and use of high-quality materials were incorporated to soften the appearance of blank wall planes. Most embellishments and detailing are prominent along the north elevation and the main entrance. The new building will be set back approximately 15 feet from the main Biane Winery building, which will help to preserve existing views of the property from 8th Street. Staff also worked with the Engineering Services Department to retain the existing historic spur line that runs along the north perimeter of the property. The spur line will be protected in place when undergrounding utilities within the right-of-way. With the proposed demolition of the Bottling Plant/Warehouse and Dry Wine Bottling Room buildings, the west end of the Biane Winery building will be newly exposed. This wall has not been exposed in approximately 100 years. A condition will be placed on the project to preserve the west elevation of this building as historically accurate as possible. Any new materials or additions to this structure will require separate review. EXHIBIT C • Item M.24 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2007-00951 —BIANE BUSINESS PARK April 30, 2013 Page 2 1 Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major/Secondary Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Mural detailing on the walls has been removed per the applicant's request. The applicant has indicated that the building design adequately addresses the level of design necessary for an industrial building. Staff recommends that the mural detailing be added back along the north elevation. 2. Provide articulation along the east elevation with paint color or the utilization of notches in the parapets. Technical Issue: Section 17.36.040 (D)(6) of the City's Development Code requires all properties that adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines to provide rail service access. The applicant has provided an area for the proposed rail spur easement. However, it does not meet the City's Development Code minimum standard of 32 feet. The applicant has provided a letter outlining their discussion with a Railroad Engineer Consultant and how the 20 feet more than meets the railway design standards. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All groundmounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced at a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted forest green. 2. If a Double-Detector Check (DDC) and a Fire Department Connection (FDC) are required for this project, then the equipment shall be screened with a 4-foot high decorative block wall, subject to the review and approval by the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services. 3. All signs are subject to Chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property) of the Development Code. Staff Recommendation: With the Secondary issues addressed to the satisfaction of the Committee, staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval and forward the project to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee Action: The Committee was in favor of adding the mural detailing along the north elevation; they directed the applicant to work with staff on the details. The Committee felt that the mural added character to the industrial building which helped enhance the adjacent historic winery. The use Item.K&L25 DRC ACTION AGENDA DRC2007-00951 —SIANE BUSINESS PARK April 30, 2013 Page 3 of mosaic was not necessary because the adjacent winery building currently has painted murals that have held up well. The Committee was favorable to the 20-foot proposed rail spur easement. The Committee directed the applicant to work with staff to provide additional articulation along the east elevation with the use of paint or recesses to help alleviate blank wall planes. With these secondary issues addressed, the Committee recommended approval to be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Mayuko Nakajima • Item 1(91 21; ENVIRON =r� ENTAL • :.r INFORMATION FORM Of (Part I - Initial Study) City le Renedo Cucamonga Department (P/Ns@ type or print clearly using ink. Use Ne tab key to move from one line to the next Nne.) Planning Oep+rhnent (9M 477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It Is important that the information requested In this application be provided In full. Upon review of the completed initial Study Part 1 and the development application, additional Information such as,but not limited to,traffic,noise,biological,drainage,and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the Identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees, review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part Il as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing flee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, Its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL •R • • X MPLETEAPPUCATIONS WILL NOTRE PF ESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal, city staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: Biane Business Bark Name&Address of project owner(s): Paul Biane,Biane Family Er iyLt 10013 East 8th Street Unit Z Rancho Cucamon a CA 91730 NameBAddressofdeveloperorprojectsponsor. Paul Biane Biane Famil Pr erties LLC 10013 East 8th Street,Unit Z Rancho Cucamon a,CA 91730 Contact Person&Address: D�.,�m. c• -m n _ i�t�.� � 4fXHIBIT ® 3y ram OOCYSAB 1 Ot1O c�•[�� Rev.3/17104 Item KAI 77 Ago tWgALM IJ Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): �s�� ( LJ��� 1GAf�Iwo. + A nnIIP ril lite Irl RivemiderE 1 Telephone Number. '7(o PROJECT : DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. •1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 1 1)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site,and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north,south,east and west; views=and ftm the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features[tom the site. Include a m showing Location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): W.8th Street,Rancho Cucamonga,CAS 17 30 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0209-201-19 and 0209-201-20 `5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. It): '6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications). 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 8) include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and othergovernmental 1:1PLANNING\FINALIFORMSICOUNTERIInitial Study Partl.docPage 2 of 10 Rev.3117104 Itpm IcAI 7R agencies in order to fully implement the project: Development Review Application 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability, Plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e.,geological andlor hydrologic studies,biotic and archeological surveys,traffic studies): (See Attached Environmental Setting Description) to 10) Describe the known cultural andlor historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports A, and oral history): �Krrm�o r- AtJ The site as existin wiper at is no Ion er in operation .The site was established in the early 1900's.Further cultural anal sic completed by a city initiated Cultural Consultant, �Q I:IPLANNINGIFINALWORMSICOUNTERUnitial Study Parti docPage 3 of 10 Rev.3117104 1tcm VVI 70 11) Describe any noise sources and their/eve/s that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: The site is currently impacted by noise from automobile truck and train traffic along 8th Street r Properties to the east and south have warehouse facilitiies and dock noise attributed to trucks However,the noise does not impact the Proposed site Ail warehouse facilities and dock noise will be within industrial levels and comply with the City's noise regulations 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase,and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary (See Attached Project Description) 13) Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural,historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential,commercial,etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height frontage,setback,rear yard, etc.): (See Attached Project Description) 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern,scale,or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No the proposed proiect will not change the pattern scale or character surrounding the general area of the projec Surrounding use is primarily industrial therefore keeping with the surrounding scale and character. 1:1PLANNINGIFINAL%FORMS%COUNTERUnival Study Partl.doePage a of 10 Rev.3/17/04 Itcm iezi 2n REVISED ENVIRONMENT INFORMATION FORM • PART 1 —Initial Study 12) The proposed project consists of a facility with 122,300 square feet for manufacturing and warehousing. A dock area, 100 parking stalls, 24 trailer stalls, potential rail access as well as drives/fire lanes, concrete garden walls between the project and the adjacent existing facilities east of the project and landscaping that meet the city's current design requirements are included in the design. A new-shared drive off of 8'"Street between the project and the existing facilities to the east is also being proposed. Itom k1ki ll 15) indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. Now will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing areproposed? Temporary noise.will be generated from the grading and construction process. Long term noise generated from warehouse facilities and dock noise will be within industrial levels and comply with the City's noise regulations a ireai�nctilf�P�iranw` t�. `16) indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the silo drains. The.Site has a n existing lateral water line coming off 8th street. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water Districl at 987-2591. a. Residential(gai/day) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial4nd. (gal/day/ac) T72(r Peak use(gal/minlac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑Septic Tank ®Sewer if septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gel/day) b. CommerciaUlndustrial(gallday/ac) RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 26) Number of residential units: . Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes,minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): I:IPLANNINGIFINALIFORMSACOUNTER1lnitial Study Partl.docPage 5 of 10 Rev.3/17104 /tarn /CRI -47 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sate Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type. 24) indicate the expected number of schoolchildren who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B.- 9. .a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High ® COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial,industrial or institutional uses: Light Industrial-Warehouse facility 26) Total floor area of commercial,industrial,or institutional uses by type: ( 304- ,,gg, sq.ft.of industrial warehouse X4,02"0 .ft.of offices ace 27) Indicate hours of operation: TBD 28) Number of employees: Total TBD Maximum Shift~: TBD Time of Maximum Shift TBD I'\PLANNING\FINAUFORMSICOUNTEMInnisI Study Partl docPage 6 of 10 Rev.3/17/04 • 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classirications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classirrcation(attach additional sheet if necessary): TBD 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City. TBD '31) For commercial and industrial uses onk indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be venfted through the South Coast Air Quality Management District,at(818)572-6283): ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,lire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the propyo�seedd project?,Ifiso,please indicate their response. '[ LJ 33) In the known history of this property,has there been any use, storage,or discharge of hazardous andibr toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include,but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels,oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use,storage, and/or discharge on the property,as well as the dates of use,if known. There are no known hazardous or toxic materials. I:%PLANNING%FINAL%FORMSI000NTER%Initial Study Partl.docPage 7 of 10 Rev 3/17104 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use,storage,or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas,shall be shown and • labeled on the application plans. Nn 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: i hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct lot he best of my knowledge and belief l further understand that additional inthrmatio may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucam Date: Signature: Title. • I:IPLANNING\FINALiFORMSICOUNTERIInitial Study Partl.docPage 8 of 10 Rev.3!17104 • WOO V9.1 2C ATTACHMENT"A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit(tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit(tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit(tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit(tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit(tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit(tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gaVday/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering& Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 1:1PLANNINGIFINALIFORMSICOUNTERUnitial Study Partl.docPage 9 of 10 Rev.3/17/04 Itam VVI 20Z ATTACHMENT B ® Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road. Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 1:1PLANNINGiFINALIFORMSICCUNTERIIndial Study Partl.docPage 10 of 10 ® Rev.3117!04 Itcm L-JLI 17 City of Rancho Cucamonga ;71 � - - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 - BIANE BUSINESS PARK-A request to modify the Biane Winery, a complex comprised of fifteen (15) buildings/structures and three (3) single-family residences located on two (2) parcels with a combined area of 10.41 acres by demolishing the existing Bottling Plant/Warehouse and Dry Wine Bottling Room and constructing an industrial warehouse building of 122,304 square foot within the General Industrial (GI) District located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues - APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. 2. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00475 3. Description of Project: The site is a winery complex comprised of fifteen (15) buildings/structures (two of which are on separate parcels outside of the project area), associated equipment, and three(3) single-family residences located ontwo(2)parcels with a combined area of 10.41 acres. The site, known as the Biane Winery, is located on the south side of Eighth Street between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The winery was formerly known as the Padre Winery (State Primary Number 36-016423), The winery was previously determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places(National Register) in 2001 by a consensus through the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 process (California Historical Resource Status Code 2S2). The 15 buildings • and structures consist of the winery building, bottling plant and warehouse, grape crushing building and grape pits, distillery and shops, bonded warehouse, sherry room, dry wine bottling, winemaker's residence, office/caretaker residence, a restroom, cooperage shop, foreman's residence, chemical room, and a lunch shelter. The applicant proposes to demolish the Bottling Plant/Warehouse and Dry Wine Bottling Room buildings and construct a 122,304 square-foot industrial warehouse building on 6.51 acres of the site. The eastern 3.9 acres of the site are not a part of this project. In addition to the demolition of the two buildings, two (2) of the winery residences will be moved to an off-site location. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Jary Cockroft 14235 Farralon Court Fontana, CA 92336 5. General Plan Designation: General Industrial(GI) District 6. Zoning: General Industrial (GI) District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The project will encompass 6.51 of the 10.41 acres. The site is a rectangular configuration consisting of two separate parcels. Dimensions north to south run approximately 568 feet and 856 feet running east to west. To the east, south, and west are existing industrial/commercial buildings. To the north, on the opposite side of Eighth Street, is a railway alignment consisting of two(2)tracks. Residential development exists on the opposite side of the rail tracks. A rail line runs north to south just west of the project site, and there is also an extant railroad siding that runs along the front of the property that will not be substantially removed or paved over as part of this project. This siding was historically used to for shipping the completed products along the BNSF railroad alignment, which runs east to west along the north side of Eighth Street. • Itom ICA.I 4a Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Mayuko Nakajima Assistant Planner (909)477-2750, ext. 4307 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report FPEIR-Final Program Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM,o—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G—Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ( )Aesthetics ( )Agricultural Resources (x)Air Quality (x) Biological Resources (x)Cultural Resources (x)Geology&Soils (x)Greenhouse Gas ( )Hazards&Waste Materials (x) Hydrology&Water Quality Emissions ( ) Mineral Resources (x) Noise ( ) Land Use& Planning ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Population& Housing () Utilities$Service Systems ( )Mandatory Findings of Transportation/Traffic Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this se because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project propor ITIGA ED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONwill be prepared. pyr Prepared By: lea611� Date: -7 Reviewed By. SM�n� Date: 7 t Rev 2-26-13 Item KRd1 'A4 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 3 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco atea Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Figure LU-6. b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. • c) The site is located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues and is characterized by industrial/commercial development to the east, south, and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Eighth Street, is a railway alignment consisting of two (2) tracks. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project as the site is in an area designated for general industrial uses. Design review is required prior to approval. The applicant will install street improvements and landscaping along the public right-of-way. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of street lights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ( ) ( ) (✓) ( ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Williamson Act contract? • Rev 2-26-13 Item KAI 4t1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Su PP g ortin Information Sources: P0t8fcaWith That Signifitant nt Mitigation SignKcent No Imoo ted Imped I C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause re-zoning of, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓ ) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () ( ) ( ) (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues and is characterized by industrial1commercial development to the east, south, and west. There are approximately 209 acres of Farmland of Local Importance, Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga according to the General Plan and the California Department of Conservation Farmland Map 2010. Concentrations of Important Farmland are sparsely located in the southern and eastern parts of the City that is characterized by existing and planned development. Farmland in the southern portion of the City is characterized by industrial, residential, and commercial land uses and Farmland in the eastern portion of the City is within the Etiwanda area and planned for development. Further, a large number of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FPEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is zoned as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related to the conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. No mitigation is required. d) There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Therefore no impacts would occur related of the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Further, there are no areas within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that are zoned as forest land,timberland, or Timberland Production. e) The site is located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues and is characterized by industrial/commercial development to the east, south, and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Eighth Street, is a railway alignment consisting of two (2) tracks. The nearest agricultural use is more than Rev 2-26-13 Item KRL41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 5 Less® Sign Tran Significant Levi Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Int act 0.76 miles north from the project site. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project.- a) roject.a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () ( ) ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? • Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.3), the proposed project would not interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards for Criterion 1 Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations (local air quality impacts) or Criterion 2 Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP (consistency with the 2003 AQMP). Therefore the project is consistent with the 2003 AQMP and is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) Both the State of California and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants. These pollutants include ozone (03), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less(PM,o), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PM2.5) microns in diameter and lead. Among these pollutants, ozone and particulate matter (PM,o and PM2.$) are considered regional pollutants while the others have more localized effects. In addition, the State of California has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), vinyl chloride and visibility reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. The City of Rancho Cucamonga area is within the South Coast Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) provides the SCAQMD with the authority to manage transportation activities at indirect sources. Indirect sources of pollution are generated when minor sources collectively emit a substantial amount of pollution. Examples of this include motor vehicles at an intersection, a mall and on highways. SCAQMD also Rev 2-26-13 Item KAI d7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 6 Less Than Sipndicant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Iffoact Incorporated Impact I 8R regulates stationary sources of pollution within in jurisdictional area. Direct emissions from motor vehicles are regulated by the Air Resources Board(ARB). The combination of topography, low mixing height, abundant sunshine, and emissions from the second largest urban area in the United States gives the Basin the worst air pollution problem in the nation. The Basin experiences a persistent temperature inversion (increasing temperature with increasing altitude); this inversion (coupled with low wind speeds) limits the vertical dispersion of air contaminants, holding them relatively near the ground. Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) of 1970, the EPA established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six major pollutants, termed criteria pollutants: ozone (03), coarse particulate matter with a diameter or 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter less than 2.5 (PWO microns in diameter, carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide(NO2), sulfur dioxide(SO2), and lead. Criteria pollutants are defined as those pollutants for which the Federal and State governments have established AAQS, or criteria, for outdoor concentrations in order to protect public health. Data collected at permanent monitoring stations are used by the EPA to classify regions as "attainment" or "non-attainment depending on whether the regions met the requirements stated in the primary NAAQS. Nonattainment areas have additional restrictions as required by the EPA. The EPA has designated the Southern Califomia Association of Governments (SCAG) as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) responsible for ensuring the Basin's compliance with the FCAA. The South Coast Air Basin is in Non-Attainment Status for Ozone, PM,o and PM2.5. Specific criteria for determining whether the potential air quality impacts of a project are significant are set forth in the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The criteria include daily emissions thresholds, compliance with State and national air quality standards, and consistency with the current AQMP. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates on May 30, 2013, that utilizes the California Emissions Estimator Model Version 2011.1.1 (CalEEMod) methodology to evaluate short-term construction emissions and short-term construction emissions for localized significant thresholds, long-term operational emissions, operation emissions for localized significant thresholds, and Green House Gas Emissions. Short Term(Construction)Impacts 2014 Unmitigated Emisslons(pounds per day) Source. - ROO NO, CO SO2 PM10 PMu Grading 11.34 90.77 52.19 0.10 10.84 7.51 Demolition 9.27 75.28 46.32 0.08 12.4 3.66 Building Construction 5.28 35.36 28.20 0.06 3.12 2.18 Paving 5.29 32.18 21.72 0.03 2.98 2.76 Architectural Coating 28.83 2.83 2.60 0.00 0.40 0.25 Maximum Daily Emissions 28.82 90.77 52.19 1 0.10 12.40 7.51 Rev 2-26-13 Item WWI a2 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 7 • Leaa Than $ignrfieant Lees Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Then Significant Mitigation Significant Wo Impact Incorporated Impact Im.] Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact No No 7 No No No No ROG=reactive organic gases; NOx=oxides of nitrogen;CO=carbon monoxide;SOx=sulfur oxides; PM 10 and PM2.5=particulate matter Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis-Appendix A(CaIEEMod Output) FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates,May 30,2013 Source 2014 Mitigated Emisslons(pounds per day) ROG NO. c0 SO2 PAMo PMze Grading 11.34 90.77 52.19 0.10 6.97 5.49 Demolition 9.27 75.28 46.32 0.08 9.9 3.66 Building Construction 5.28 35.36 28.20 0.06 3.12 2.18 Paving 5.29 32.18 21.72 0.03 2.98 2.76 Architectural Coating 28.83 2.83 2.60 0.00 0.40 0.25 Maximum Daily Emissions 28.82 90.77 52.19 0.10 9.90 5.49 • Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact No No No No No No ROG=reactive organic gases;NOx=oxides of nitrogen; CO=carbon monoxide;SOx=sulfur oxides;PM10 and PM2.5=particulate matter Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis-Appendix A(CaIEEMod Output) FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates, May 30, 2013 Equipment Exhausts and Related Construction Activities Construction activities produce combustion emissions from various sources such as site grading, utility engines, on-site heavy-duty construction vehicles, asphalt paving, and motor vehicles transporting the construction crew. Exhaust emissions from construction activities envisioned on-site would vary daily as construction activity levels change. The use of construction equipment on-site would result in localized exhaust emissions. Fugitive Dust Fugitive dust emissions are generally emissions are generally associated with land clearing and exposure of soils to the air and wind, and cut-and-fill grading operations. Dust generated during construction varies substantially on a project-by project basis, depending on the level of activity, the specific operation and weather conditions at the time of construction. Construction emissions can vary greatly depending on the level of activity, the specific operations taking place, the equipment being operated, local soils, weather conditions and other factors. The proposed project will be required to comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403 to control fugitive dust. • Rev 2-26-13 Itpm Il AA Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 8 Leas Than Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Then Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco aged Impact impact Architectural Coatings Architectural coatings contain VOCs that are similar to ROCs and are part of the 03 precursors. There will be an industrial building proposed for the project. Based on the proposed project, it is estimated that the proposed buildings will result in approximately 28.83 lbs of VOC per day during the coating phase. The emissions would occur after grading activities, near the end of the construction period. Therefore, this VOC emission is the principal air emission and is less than the SCAQMD VOC threshold of 75 lbs/day. Emissions associated with architectural coatings could be reduced by using pre-coated/natural-colored building materials, using water-based or low-VOC coating, and using coating transfer or spray equipment with high transfer efficiency. For example, a high-volume, low-pressure(HVLP) spray method is a coating application system operated at air pressure between 0.1 and 10 pounds per square inch gauge (psig), with 65 percent transfer efficiency. Manual applications such as paintbrush, and roller trowel, spatula, dauber, rag, or sponge have 100 percent transfer efficiency. Odors Heavy-duty equipment in the project area during construction would emit odors. However, the construction activity would cease to occur after individual construction is completed. No other sources of objectionable odors have been identified for the proposed project, and no mitigation measures are required. The Air Quality Analysis prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates, May 30, 2013, completed for the project states that land uses typically considered associated with odors include wastewater treatment facilities, waste-disposal facilities, or agricultural operations. The project does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. In compliance with SCAQMD Rule 402 the proposed uses are not anticipated to emit any objectionable odors. Therefore, objectionable odors posing a health risk to potential on-site and existing off-site uses would not occur as a result of the proposed project. Naturally Occurring Asbestos The proposed project is located in San Bernardino County, and it is not among the counties that are found to have serpentine and ultramafic rock in their soils. In addition, there has been no serpentine or ultramafic rock found in the project area. Therefore, the potential risk for naturally occurring asbestors (NOA) during project construction is small and less-than-significant. 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(short term) Short Term (Construction) Emissions - Continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to Rev 2-26-13 Itpm IM dS Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 9 • Lese Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation S gnrftant No Impact Incorporated Im ed Impact be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)on a project- specific basis and in conformance with the General Plan FPEIR. Therefore, the following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction-site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was Investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. • 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally,contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction-site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (Le., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. • Rev 2-26-13 Itpm ICRI Alf; Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 10 Lees Than SignMeent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poteneelry wdn Than Signdicam Mitlgeeon SignMosm No ]mosa In ed Impact Impact 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce PM10 emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans Include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan (FPEIR), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Ozone (03), and Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10) would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance; therefore, they would all be cumulatively considerable if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. Lona Term(Operationail Impacts Long Term Project Ooerational Emissions Long term air pollutant emission impacts are those associated with stationary sources and mobile sources involving any project-related changes. The proposed project would result in a net increase in the number of industrial uses in the project area; therefore, the proposed project would result in net increases in both stationary and mobile source emissions. The stationary source emissions would come from additional natural gas consumption for on-site buildings and electricity for the lighting in the buildings and at the parking area. Based on the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates, May 30, 2013, the long term operation emissions associated with the proposed project, calculated with the California Emissions Estimator Model (CALEEMOD) shows that the increase of all criteria pollutants as a result of the proposed project would be less than the corresponding SCAQMD daily emission thresholds. Therefore, project-related, long term air quality impacts would not be significant. Mitigation measures would not be required. Rev 2-26-13 Item KAL47 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 11 • Lean Than Significant Less Potentially ally Wan Than and Supporting Information Sources. Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Im eG Table 11:Operational Emissions Winter Emissions(pounds per day) Source voc Now co Sox PMio PM2.6 Mobile 5.19 15.22 47.47 0.08 10.10 0.91 Energy 0.12 I.09 0.92 0.01 0.08 0.08 Area 3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total B.51 16.31 48.39 0.09 10.18 0.99 Significance Threshold 55 55 - 550 :5o 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No NO No Notes: area sources include painting,consumer products,hearth,and landscaping VOC.volatile organic compounds Nos=nitrogen oxides CO-carcon monoxide $0.=sutfur oxides PM;;and PMS;=particuldte matter Source:Appendix A:CaIEEMOd output. Summer E;rnlsslons(pounds per day) Source. VOC NOx CO Sox PMto PMzs Mobile 5.27 14.40 51.49 0.09 10.10 0.90 Energy 0.12 1.09 0.92 0.01 0.08 0.08 Area 3.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 8.59 15.49 52.41 0.10 10.18 0.98 Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact No No No No No No Notes: Area sources include painting,consumer products,hearth,and landscaping VOC=volatile organic compounds; NOx=oxides of nitrogen;CO=carbon monoxide;Sox= sulfur oxides; PM 10 and PM2.5=particulate matter Source: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis-Appendix A(CaIEEMod Output) FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates,May 30,2013 2010 General Plan FPEIR Air Quality Analysis and Mitigation Measures(long term) Lona Term (Operational) Emissions - The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR)analyzed the impacts of Air Quality based on the future build out of the City. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 4.3-3 of the General Plan FPEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 1) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle services. 2) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. Rev 2-26-13 Item KRI 4R Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 12 Less Than signficent Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S°tafi eM M;t',""" " 9n potion Sipnficant NO Im I irporated Impact I Im as 3) Improve thermal Integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 4) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 5) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 6) All Industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 7) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 8) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules In conspicuous areas. 9) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council as noted in the General Plan FPEIR(Section 4.3). C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 4.3), continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FPEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located within 0.02 mile of a sensitive receptor, which is residential development just north of the project site on the opposite side of the rail tracks. Potential impacts to air quality are consistent with the Public Health and Safety Super-Element within the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. During construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. The mitigation measures listed under b) above and the following mitigation measure will reduce impact to less-than-significant levels. 10) , All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Bunning Devices. Rule 44S was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 Rev 2-26-13 Item km 49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 13 Lep Than Significant Lep Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No impact Ines glad Impact Impact and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths)in new development on or after March 9,2009. e) Construction Odors (Short-term) may include odors associated with equipment use including diesel exhaust or roofing, painting and paving. These odors are temporary and would dissipate rapidly. Operation Odors (Long-term) are typically associated with the type of use. Industrial uses could create objectionable odors and, therefore, are located away from residential uses and sensitive receptors. The site is located 50 meters from a residential development. According to the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates on May 30, 2013, land uses typically considered associated with odors include wastewater treatment facilities, waste-disposal facilities, or agricultural operations. The project does not contain land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? • b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () (✓) ( ) ( ) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) () ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with industrial/commercial uses. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of the winery, miscellaneous buildings, ® Rev 2-26-13 Itcm V.9.1 CA Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 14 Lose Than significant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Pani f�"y Weft n'�' PP g Significant Mitigation SigndKant NO Impact Incorpwated Impact Impact surrounding developments on adjacent properties, and infrastructure. According to the General Plan Figure RC-4, and Section 4.4 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The City is primarily located in an urban area that does not contain large, contiguous natural open space areas. Wildlife potentially may move through the north to south trending tributaries in the northern portion of the City and within the Sphere-of-Influence. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is in conflict with the Tree Preservation ordinance. A Tree Removal Permit has been submitted for removal of on-site trees. Replacement trees shall be planted on a one-to-one basis. f) Neither the City nor the SOI are within an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved State Habitat Conservation Plan area. The project site is not located within a local conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Figure RC-1. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of a historical resource as defined in g 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site is eligible as a "Historic. Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation), and previously determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A for its significant associations with the history of viticulture in Rancho Cucamonga and under Criterion C as a good example of the Mission Revival architectural style as applied to a winery. A cultural impacts assessment was completed by LSA in July 2009. The project does not meet Standards 2, 9, and 10 of the Secretary's Standards for Rehabilitation. Two of the standards (2 and 9) relate to the removal or destruction of features that characterize a property, while one of the standards (10) relates to the alteration of an Rev 2-26-13 Itam ICZ1 9;1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 15 • Lesa Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Patentialty with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact In atad I Impact Impact environment and essential form of the property. However, these potential impacts can be mitigated to a level that is less-than-significant for the purposes of CEQA, as explained below. Removal of Contributing Features Biane Winery is eligible for the National and California Registers under Criterion A/1 for its historical association with Viticulture in the Cucamonga Valley and under Criterion C/3 as one of few(if any) intact examples in Rancho Cucamonga of a Winery as a property type. Although the Dry Wine Bottling Room (Figure 2, Building 7) contributes to the historical associations of the property under Criterion All, its removal does not reduce Biane Winery's historical associations to the extent that the property would no longer be eligible for the National or California Registers under that criterion. Likewise, under Criterion C/3, the Dry Wine Bottling room represents a functioning part of a winery property, but its removal would not diminish the significance of Biane Winery under Criterion C as a property type. Although the Bottling Plant and Warehouse (Figure 2, Building 2) contributes to the historical associations of the property under Criterion A/1 and functional character of the property type under Criterion C/3, its removal does not reduce the historical associations of Biane Winery to the extent that the property would no longer be eligible for the National or California Registers under those criteria. This building was originally constructed for use as a cannery and became historically associated with the winery sometime after the 1930s. • It has sustained numerous alterations and retains a lower degree of integrity relative to the rest of the winery. Furthermore, the demolition of both buildings will not reduce the significant historical associations of the Biane Winery or integrity as a significant property type under criteria A/1 and C/3. The winery functions that were historically carried out in these buildings (specifically the bottling of wine) were also performed in the main winery building; therefore, they do not uniquely represent any important functions of the winery. Compared to other winery properties in the Cucamonga Valley, the Biane Winery has retained several buildings representing most or all of the critical steps in the process of making wine and brandy, including grape crushing equipment, a distillery, a bonded warehouse, bottling plant, and even the means to transport the finished products (railroad siding). Even if both the Dry Wine Bottling Room and the Bottling Room and Warehouse are demolished, this important aspect of the significance of the winery will not change significantly. The removal of both bottling buildings will not result in a significant impact per CEQA. Relocation of Contributing Features The relocation of two contributing residences would not affect the eligibility of the winery under the National or California Registers under Criterion C/3 because they do not represent a functional aspect of the winery as a property type. The buildings would be preserved on another site and would not be destroyed. The contributing residences have significant historical ties to the Biane Winery under Criterion A/1. They are both residences that historically housed winery staff, and their historic context is linked to their proximity and visual connection with the Biane Winery. If they are relocated off-site, the residences would lose the connection to their historical Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 16 Less Then Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: SCte tiwm, Thain pn t M'Q9e0n Significant No I I wMated ImpactIm eq context. However, without the residences, Biane Winery would remain eligible for the National and California Registers under Criterion A/1, and neither residence appears individually eligible for the National or California Registers or for local designation. Therefore, the relocation of the residences is a less-than-significant impact for the purposes of CEQA. Though not mitigation, LSA recommends the following to further reduce this impact. 1) Prepare and affix identifying plaques to the relocated residences. This would consist of at minimum an 8-inch x 10-inch durable plaque for both of the relocated residences to identify their original locations and historical association with the Biane Winery. The plaques would be affixed to the residences in a publicly viewable location.This would preserve a historical tie between the residences and the winery, mitigating the loss of their on-site historical association. Combined Project Imoacts to the Setting of the Winery The removal of four contributing resources from the Biane Winery complex would potentially impact the setting of the winery. However, the contributors that are proposed for removal are located on the periphery of the winery complex, and their removal would still leave intact the core of contributing resources. The remaining winery complex would retain the same location, design, feeling, association, materials, and workmanship. Furthermore, the remaining winery would retain sufficient integrity of setting to preserve its eligibility for the National and California Registers under both Criterion All and C/3. This potential impact is less-than-significant for the purposes of CEQA. Although it is not mitigated, LSA recommends the following measure to further reduce this potential impact: 2) Complete Historic American Buildings Survey (HAGS III). Prior to demolition or relocation of any contributing feature, the Biane Winery should be documented to Level III of HAGS by a qualified professional. This documentation consists of the following: • A sketch plan depicting all extant features on the winery property; • Large format (flinch x,5-inch negatives at minimum) archival quality black-and-white photographs of exterior elevations, interior views, character-defining features,and context views; • If available, copies of elevation drawings,floor plans, measured drawings, historic photographs,and newspaper articles; and • Written data discussing the history and development of the property.(The report prepared by LSA in 2008 will satisfy the requirements for the written data.) 3) Copies of the HABS documentation should be submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, the Paul A. Biane branch of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library, the Norman F. Feldheym Library, and submitted to the State Office of Historic Preservation for approval before being submitted to the State archive or other appropriate repository. Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 17 • Leas Than Significant Lose Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorpmted Impact Impact b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report(FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of Cultural Resources based on the future build out of the City. The following mitigation measures as identified in the FPEIR shall be implemented: 4) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying a in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. c) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.6) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the research performed at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County and the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Sphere-of-Influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000 t0100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per the Public Safety Element of the General Plan; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 5) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to Rev 2-26-13 I+-- vo.t re Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 18 Less Than Sigiftant Lesa Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially """' Than Significant Mitigation Significant No ]1ftoact Incorporated I Impact Impact monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor,trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, Identify,and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by industrial/commercial development. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () ( ) ( ) (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () ( ) ( ) (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review ORC2007-00951 Page 19 • Leas Than Significant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Inco ated Impact Im ep b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( ) ( ) () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( ) ( ) () (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Figure PS-2, and Section 4.7 of the General Plan FPEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within approximately 1.5 mile north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 5 miles north These faults are both capable of producing M,,, 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to MM,7.5 earthquakes is approximately 10 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M, 8.2 earthquakes, is approximately 15 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code and Standard Conditions will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area Exhibit 4.7-4 of the General Plan FPEIR. The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off- site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Patentiagy wm, man Significant Mitigation Signrfieant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. C) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.7) indicates that there is a potential for the hillside areas at the northern end of the City and in the SOI for slope failure, landslides, and/or erosion. Areas subject to slope instability contain slopes of 30 percent or greater. Landslides may be induced by seismic activity, rain, or construction. The City Hillside Development Regulations prohibits the development within slopes of 30 percent or greater and limit the number of units that could be constructed within the Hillside Residential and Very Low Density Residential designations in the Hillside areas. The site is not within an Earthquake hazard zone or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-2. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Hanford Coarse Sandy Loam Soil association according to General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.7-3. These soils are typically stable. No averse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or altemative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project., a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: a) Regulations and Significance-The Federal Government began studying the phenomenon of global warming as early as 1979 with the National Climate Protection Act(92 Stat. 601). In June of 2005, Governor Schwarzenegger established California's Green House Gas ("GHG") emissions reduction target in Executive Order (EO) S-3-05. The EO created goals to reduce GHG emissions for the State of California to 2000 levels by 2010; GHG emissions reduced to 1990 levels by 2020; and GHG emissions reduced to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Additionally, on December 7, 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued findings regarding GHGs under rule 202(a) of the Clean Air Act (i) that GHGs endanger human health; and (2)that this will be the first steps to regulating GHGs through the Federal Clean Air Act. The USEPA defines six key GHGs (carbon dioxide [CO2], methane [CH4], nitrous oxide [N20], hydrofluorocarbons [HFCs], perfluorocarbons [PFCs], and sulfur hexafluoride [SFe]. The combined emissions of these well-mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and engines contribute to GHG pollution. Rev 2-26-13 Itam ICRI S7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 21 • Less Than Significant Lees Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Signr ieant Miligation Significant No Impact Inco aced Impact Impact The western states, including Arizona, California, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Washington, already experience hotter, drier climates. California is a substantial contributor of GHGs and is expected to see an increase of three to four degrees Fahrenheit( F)over the next century. Assembly Bill (AB) 32 requires that the California Air Resources Board (ARB), the lead agency for implementing AB 32, determine what the statewide GHG emission level was in 1990 and approve a statewide GHG emissions limit (427 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent) to be achieved by 2020 and prepare a Scoping Plan to outline the main strategies for meeting the 2020 deadline. Significant progress can be made toward the 2020 goal through existing technologies and improving the efficiency of energy use. Other solutions would include improving the State's infrastructure and transitioning to cleaner and more efficient sources of energy. The ARB estimates that 38 percent of the State's GHG emissions in 2004 was from transportation sources followed by electricity generation (both in-State and out-of-State)at 28 percent and industrial at 20 percent. Residential and commercial activities account for 9 percent, agricultural uses at 6 percent, high global warming potential gases at 3 percent, and recycling and waste at 1 percent. . It is not anticipated that any single development project would have a substantial effect on global climate change but that GHG emissions from the project would combine with emissions across California, the United States, and the world to cumulatively contribute to • global climate change. Therefore, consistent with the ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan, the proposed project was evaluated for consistency with the Early Action Measures (Scoping Plan is a recommendation until adopted through normal rulemaking). The proposed project is assessed by determining its consistency with the 37 Recommended Actions identified by ARB. In compliance with Senate Bill (SB) 97 and CEQA, the project has been analyzed based on a qualitative based standard" (CEQA 15064.4). Additionally, the ARB was directed through SB 375 to develop regional GHG emission reduction targets to be achieved within the automobile and light truck sectors for 2020 and 2035. SCAQMD and ARB maintain ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Basin. The stations closest to the project site are the Upland station and the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The Upland station monitors all criteria pollutant except PM,o, PM2,5, and SO2 which are monitored at the Fontana-Arrow Highway station. The ambient air quality in the project area for CO, NO2, and SO2 are consistently below the relevant State and Federal standards (based on ARB and EPA from 2007, 2008, and 2009 readings). Ozone, PM,o, and PM2_5 levels all exceed State and Federal standards regularly. Project Related Sources of GHG's - Based on the Guidelines for the Implementation of California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G, a project would normally be considered to have a significant effect on air quality if the project would violate any ambient air quality standards, contribute substantially to an existing air quality violation, expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, or conflict with adopted environmental plans and goals of the community. However, neither the CEQA statutes, Office of Planning and Research (OPR) guidelines, nor the draft proposed changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for performing an impact analysis. Significance criteria are left to the judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. • Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 22 Leas Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Project-related GHG's would include emissions from direct and indirect sources. Based on the Air Quality Analysis prepared by FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates, May 30, 2013, the project would result in the following emissions of carbon dioxide[CO2], methane [CH41, nitrous oxide [N20], and would not result in the other GHG's. As seen in the tables below, the proposed project would result in a total of 360.69 MTCO2eq/yr from construction activities and 7,747.64 MTCO2eq/yr for operational sources (including mobile sources). Total project related emissions would result in 8,108.33 MTCO2eq/yr (construction, operational, and mobile combined). Short Term (Construction) GHG Emissions - The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.5) indicates that GHG emissions result from construction activities associated with diesel-powered construction equipment and other combustion sources (i.e. Generators, workers vehicles, material delivery, etc.). The GHG emitted by construction equipment is primarily carbon dioxide (CO2). The highest levels of construction related GHG's occur during site preparation including demolition, grading, and excavation. Constriction related GHG's are also emitted from off-site haul trucks and construction workers traveling to the job site. Exhaust emissions from construction activities would vary each day with the changes in construction activity on-site. The combustion of fossil-based fuels creates GHG's such as CO2, Cho, and N20. CH4 is emitted during the fueling of heavy equipment. Construction greenhouse gas emissions are: Table 12:Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Annual Emissions(MTCO=e) PtuM 01,1stto . offsite Total Demolition 34.13 7.81 41.94 Grading 147.98 900 150.98 Construction 110.18 30.20 140.39 Paving 2257 1.27 23.84 Painting 2.% 1.00 3.56 Total 360.69 Notes: ,MTCOre-metr.c!ori nl carbon dioxide equivalents(ndude%carbon dioxide,rnetranr,and/or n.trous oxide). Source: CaIEEMod output(Appendix A). Although the emissions are less than the de facto SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT/year, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to further reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on Rev 2-26-13 Item 114.1 CO Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 23 • Potentialry With Than Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant an Signifitant Mitigpton SipnRceM No I Ine atetl Im act Im an the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained In accordance with the manufactures'specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for the construction crew. Long Term (OverafionaD GHG's Emissions - The primary source of GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would be from motor vehicles, combustion of natural gas for space and water heating, as well as off-site GHG emissions from generation of electricity consumed by the proposed land use development over a long term. CEQA requires the Lead Agency to review the project for"adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure," to determine potential impacts of GHG's. Therefore, the project has been analyzed based on methodologies and information available to the City at the time this document was prepared. Estimates are based on past performance and represent a scenario that is a worst case with the understanding that technology changes may reduce GHG emissions in the future. To date, there is no established quantified GHG • emission threshold, but the de facto screening threshold is 3,000 MT/year. Operational greenhouse gas emissions are: Table 13:Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Emissions Source (MTCO=o per year) Mobile 1,OS8.79 Energy 614.85 Water 2,825.14 Waste 3,236.84 Subtotal—Operation 7,735.62 Subtotal—Construction 12.02 (averaged over 30 years) Total 7,747 64 SCAQMD Draft Threshold 101000 Potentially significant impact? No Notes: MTCO2e=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents Source of emissions:CaiEEMod(Appendix A) • Rev 2-26-13 . t+..— voIen Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 24 Less Than S-gnfcant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact 1=rWated Irnpact I-pact The project involves the construction of a 122,304 square-foot industrial warehouse building and therefore would result in an increase in the net increases of both stationary and mobile source emissions. The majority of energy consumption typically occurs during project operation (more than 80 percent and less than 20 percent during construction activities). The proposed project will incorporate several design features that are consistent with the California Office of the Attorney General's recommended measures to reduce GHG emission including improvements related to sustainable development such as water efficient landscaping, carpool parking, and bike racks. The project is consistent with the California Environmental Protection Agency Climate Action Team proposed early action measures to mitigate climate change included in the CARB Scoping Plan mandated under AB 32. The project has improvements related to sustainable development including water efficient landscaping, carpool parking, and bike racks. Additionally, the City is participating in the development. of a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS)with SANBAG for the San Bernardino County area pursuant to Senate Bill(SB)375. The long term operation emissions of the project will contribute to area pollutants but will not exceed any of the SCAQMD's thresholds. To further reduce the emissions, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound(VOC)materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures,and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored"cool"roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes(LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: Rev 2-26-13 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 25 ® Less That Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incormated Impact Impact • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or Install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by Installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design Irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. b) The project proposes the construction of a 122,304 square-foot industrial warehouse building. No other applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emission apply to the project. The 2010 General Plan Update included adopted policies and Standard Conditions that respond to the Attorney General and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The General Plan policies • and Standard Conditions guide infill and sustainable development reliant on pedestrian connections, re-use and rehabilitation of existing structures, link transportation opportunities, promote development that is sensitive to natural resources, and incentivizes denser mixed use projects that maximizes diverse opportunities. The proposed project includes bike racks, carpool parking, water efficient landscaping, and the reuse of two existing residences by relocating them off-site, and, therefore, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. The General Plan Final Program Environmental Impact Report (FPEIR) analyzed the impacts of GHG's and determined that GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable, which would be a significant unavoidable adverse cumulative impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project would not hinder the State's GHG reduction goals established by Assembly(AB) 32 and therefore would be less than a significant impact. 8. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? Rev 2-26-13 Itcm VRA 41 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 26 Less Than significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentatt' With Then Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact 1111001001. impact Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( j ( j (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments: a) The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine if the tenant's operations will include the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials and volatile fuels and if there are any potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition, which is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the State. The City has an Emergency Operations Plan that meets State and Federal requirements and is in the process of updating the approved 2005 Local Hazard Mitigation Plan. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. The proposed industrial buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine if the tenant's operations will include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels and if there are any potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No adverse impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 1+nm 114.1 G2 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 27 • Leas Than Sipntficara Lean s Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potantally wah Tha SlpnficaM Mitipauon Sipnfit•2M No Im aet Inco also Im act Im C) There is a school located within 0.25 mile of the project site. The project site is located within 0.15 mile of Rancho Cucamonga Middle School at 10022 Feron Boulevard. The project will be required to comply with existing State and Federal standards on the use and transport of hazardous materials. The proposed buildings are to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. No impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspections did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is located within an airport Land Use Plan according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1 but is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 2.07 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is off-set north of the flight path. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. No impact is anticipated. f) There are no private airstrips within the City. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is • anticipated. g) The City has a developed roadway network that provides emergency access and evacuation routes to existing development. New development will be located on a site that has access to existing roadways. The City's Emergency Operation Plan, which is updated every three years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from wind-driven fires in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone found in the northern part of the City; however, the proposed project site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone according to General Plan Figure PS-1. Fb) OLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project.- Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? ® Rev 2-26-13 Item ICRI AA Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 28 Lees Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact InmPorated Im ad Impw C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () ( ) ( ) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB), through the Regional Water Quality Control Board . (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the. State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs)to prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. Rev 2-26-13 Itam IClLI fS Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 29 ® Less Than ess Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Than Potentially With Than Significant Mmgafion Significant No Im act Inco atad Im as Im ab • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare an SWPPP. To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be required to prepare an SWPPP during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)for Post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by KCT Consultants, Inc. on February 19, 2013, which identifies BMPs to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oiUgrit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures are required to control additional storm water effluent: • Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rain y eriods experienced In Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. • Rev 2-26-13 Itcm le R.1 Ar Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 30 Leas Than SiVificara Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mnigauon Significant No Impact Inmpmaled Impad Im 5) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga In June 2004. Post-Construction Operational.• 6) The developer shall Implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by KCT Consultants, Inc. on February 19, 2013 to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical.. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to the CVWD, approximately 35 percent of the City's water is currently provided from water supplies coming from the underlying Chino and Cucamonga Groundwater Basins. The CVWD complies with its prescriptive water rights as managed by the Chino Basin Watermaster and will not deplete the local groundwater resource. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Figure RC-3. Development of the site will require the grading and excavation, but would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 300 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs but will not be a significant impact. CVWD has plans to meet this increased need to the year 2030. No impacts are anticipated. C) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on the site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official Rev 2-26-13 I+nrn V9.1 G7 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 31 • Lasa Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Sia^�cent a Potentialy WM Th"nann SiamScam M1iaati0n SianRcam No Im 8Ct Incur sled Im aCf Im ad and City Engineer prior to the issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The project is the construction of a 122,304 square foot industrial building, therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), Including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain • system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Stone Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) No housing units are proposed with this project — this is not a residential project. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to adequately convey floodwaters from a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Figure PS-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Figure PS-5. No adverse impacts are expected. • Rev 2-26-13 Itom leAl A9 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 32 Less Than signficant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Wigetion significant No Impact I atad Impad l j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs.near the project site; therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project a) Physically divide an established community? ( ) () ( ) (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) () ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The site is located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues and is characterized by industrial/commercial development to the east, south, and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Eighth Street, is a railway alignment consisting of two (2) tracks. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding industrial development to the south, east, and west The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is General Industrial. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection, SCAG's Compass Blueprint, or SCAG's Regional Comprehensive Plan. The project is to construct a 122,304 square-foot industrial warehouse building on 6.51 acres. The proposed project is consistent with the land use designations as described in the Development Code and the General Plan. The building setbacks, lot coverage/floor area ratio, plotting of the building relative to the existing buildings on-site, vehicle and pedestrian access, and landscaping are consistent with the Development Code and the General Plan. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to General Plan Figure RC-4 and Section 4.10 of the General Plan FPEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Rev 2-26-13 Itam IClLI AQ Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 33 Less Than Significant Leu Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Im act Inco teC Im act Impact 11. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Com- a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact. 12. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground bome noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is not within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Figure PS-9 at build-out. The proposed project is a 122,304 square-foot industrial warehouse building. The proposed industrial building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. The City's Development Code requires that all industrial uses be conducted within an enclosed building; hence, no adverse operational impact to nearby uses is expected. However, at the time of occupancy the Planning Department will review each Business License for each tenant to determine the potential impacts to the surrounding residential uses and elementary schools. Rev 2-26-13 Itam VAI 7r1 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than signficant Mitigation Signdreant No Impact Incorporated Int ad Impact Construction related activities such as the use of earthmoving and construction equipment, arrival/departure of contractor's vehicles and material delivery vehicles, and the construction of the building itself may create noise impacts. However, these impacts will be short term and less-than-significant when the activities are conducted in compliance with the mitigation measures listed below and the Development Code. The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic, it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Exfedor 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60dB or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. In a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. b) The proposed project is a 122,304 square-foot industrial warehouse building that will be similar in size to the surrounding buildings. The proposed industrial building is to be constructed as speculative with no definitive users at this time. The normal operations associated with this type of project normally do not induce ground bome vibrations. Construction-related activities such as the use of earthmoving and construction equipment, arrival/departure of contractors' vehicles and material delivery vehicles, and the construction of the building itself may create vibration impacts. 'However, these impacts will be short term and less-than-significant when the activities are conducted in compliance with the mitigation measures listed below and the Development Code. c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. Because the project will not significantly increase traffic as analyzed in Section 16 Transportation/Traffic; it will likely not increase ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project d) The General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.12) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level Rev 2-26-13 Item KAI 71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 35 LessSignificant Thanigndirant Leas Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Signiticant No impact Incorporated Impact Impact monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment but do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive ® land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is located within an Airport Land Use Plan but is 2.07 miles from a public airport. The Project is located approximately 2.07 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. r . POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project.- a) roject.a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. No significant impacts are anticipated. ® Rev 2-26-13 Itcm I!!!.1 77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 36 Less Then Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Signn1 """i The„ mficant M Mitigation Signfieant No Impact Inco aced Im aM Impact b) The project site is industrial with three (3) existing non-conforming residences on-site. There will be displacement of households or residences during construction. However, two residences(found to be historic contributors) are planned to be relocated to a different site. The third house (a non-contributor to historic significance) will be demolished. A. displacement of one unit is not considered substantial; therefore, no significant impact is expected. c) The project site is industrial with three (3) non-conforming residences on-site. There will be displacement of households or residences during construction. However, the two residences are planned to be relocated to a different site.. No significant impact is expected. 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? () ( ) ( ) (✓) b) Police protection? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) C) Schools? ( ) ( ) () (✓) d) Parks? () ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site is located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues and is characterized by industrial/commercial development to the east, south, and west. To the north, on the opposite side of Eighth Street, is a railway alignment consisting of two (2) tracks. It would be served by Fire Station #2 located at 9612 San Bernardino Road located approximately 1.27 mile to the north of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project to lessen the future demand and impacts to fire services. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase.in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. C) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of Building Permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Old Town Park on 10033 Feron Boulevard, is located 0.03 mile to the north Rev 2-26-13 Item KR1.71 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 37 ® Leas Than Signricant Lass Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wrth Than Signdicant Mnigatiion Sign scant No Im aq Inw ffieC Im act Im eCt of the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.14), there will be a projected increase in library space demand but with the implementation of standard conditions the increase in Library Services would be mitigated to less-than-significant impact. Additionally, the Paul A. Biane Library has an additional 14,000 square foot shell of vacant library space that is planned for future Library use. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Therefore no adverse impact is expected. 15. RECREATION. Would the project.- a) roject.a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would • occur or be accelerated? =b) Doeshe project include recreational facilitiesorthe construction or expansion of recreational , which might have an adverse physical effectnvironment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Old Town Park on 10033 Feron Boulevard, is located 0.03 miles to the north of the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. • Rev 2-26-13 [tom le R.1 7d Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 38 Less Than Significant Lees Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No IrVact Incorporated Imom Iffoact 16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy ( ) ( ) () (✓) establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) program, including, but not limited to a level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) () () (✓) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) ( ) () (✓) regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. Comments: a) The proposed project includes the development of an industrial building. The traffic study prepared by RBF Consulting (August 26, 2008) estimates that the proposed project will generate 2,625 trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FPEIR (Section 4.16), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FPEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The traffic study prepared by RBF Consulting (August 26, 2008) estimates that the proposed project will generate 235 A.M. Peak Hour Trips and 247 P.M. Peak Hour Trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair Rev 2-26-13 Itam KRI 75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 39 • Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Sigmugah ficant M on Significant No Im eel Inca stet! Im act Im act share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these Development Impact Fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted transportation development fee prior to issuance of building permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 2.07 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is off-set north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. The project is located within the Airspace Protection Area according to the General Plan Figure PS-7 and General Plan FPEIR Exhibit 4.8-1. Development within this protection area will comply with FAR Part 77 regarding height limitations in order to prevent obstruction to aircraft operations. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles during • construction and upon completion of the project and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. f) The design of the project includes features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction(e.g., bicycle racks, carpool parking, etc.). No impacts are anticipated. 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? CRequire or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( ) (01) L: water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? • Rev 2-26-13 Item K&176 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 40 Leas Than • Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact: In ateC Impact I 80 e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) () ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () ( ) ( ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-1 and RP-4 treatment plants. The RP-1 capacity is sufficient to exceed the additional development within the western and southern areas of the City. The RP-4 treatment plant has a potential ultimate capacity of 28 mgd, which is considered more than adequate to capacity to treat all increases in wastewater generation for build-out of the General Plan. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater, No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within • Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to the existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. I) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. No impacts are anticipated. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. Rev 2-26-13 • Item K&I.77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review ORC2007-00951 Page 41 • Lees Than Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wah Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO Impact Incogwated Impact Im ad 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will () ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Figure RC-4. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the project site. No impacts are anticipated. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop , the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2010 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Climate Change and Mineral Resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once • Rev 2-26-13 Item K&L78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 42 construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure.of people to increased noise levels; the loss of biological resources; loss of cultural resources and increased greenhouse gases. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier PEIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive(check all that apply): (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (T) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Report (FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates, May 30, 2013) (T) Traffic Impact Analysis (RBF Consulting, August 26, 2008) (T) Cultural Impacts Assessment (LSA Associates, Inc., July 2009) Rev 2-26-13 Item KRI7q Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2007-00951 Page 43 ® APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environ men I effects would occur. Applicant's Signature''`' G Date: � Print Name and Title: Rev 2-26-13 Item K&I-80 City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: DRC2007-00951 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components -This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring • progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management-The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner,assigned by the Planning Manager,shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP.The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures-The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga- Lead Agency Planning Department .10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item K&L81 Mitigation Monitoring Program DRC2007-00951 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures.The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring-after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting.plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Manager prior to the issuance of building permits. Item K&L82 • • • MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART III) Project File No.: DRC2007-00951 Applicant: Jary Cockroft Initial Study Prepared by: Mayuko Nakaiima Assistant Planner Date: July 24, 2013 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Section 3—n Action for Monitorin Fre uenc Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-compliance #ion 3—Air Quality Short Term(Construction)Emissions 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, PD/BO C Review of plans C 2 the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule 3and projected equipment use. Construction Qo contractors shall provide evidence that r 00 low-emission mobile construction equipment W will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD)as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C 2/4 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance BO g Review of plans standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. A/C 2 5) All construction equipment shall comply with BO C Review of plans A/C SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, 2/4 contractors shall include the following provisions: Page 1 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance • Reestablish ground cover on the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction site through seeding and waterin . • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul BO C Review oflans roads. p AIC 2/4 • Phase grading to prevent the: BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of workeriods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering ractices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule BO C During construction A 4 established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing c may vary depending upon the time of 3 year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high B0 C During construction A 4 r winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding $° 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard BO C During Construction A 4 ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During construction A soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD q and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A q SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Page 2 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance 8) The construction contractor shall utilize BO C Review of plans A/C 4 electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Long Term Emissions 1) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy BO C Review of plans A1C vehicles and shuttle services. 2/4 2) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during BO E Review of plans A 7 off-peak hours. 3) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and BO C Review of plans reduce thermal load with automated time A1C 2/4 clocks or occupant sensors. 4) Landscape with native and/or drought- BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 resistant species to reduce water 3 consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 5) Provide lighter color roofing and road B0 C Review of plans AIC 2/4 CA materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AOMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 6) All industrial and commercial facilities shall BO C Review of plans A 4 post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 7) All industrial and commercial facilities shall PD C Review of plans A/C 2/3 designate preferential parking for vanpools. 8) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Review of plans D 213 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 9) All industrial and commercial site tenants with PD C Review of plans D 2/3 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to, the extent Page 3 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-compliance reasonably feasible. 10) All new development in the City of Rancho BO C/D Review of plans C Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast 2/4 Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Section'S—Cultural Resources 1) Prepare and affix identifying plaques to the PD D Review of A/C 3 relocated residences. This would consist of at Plans/Report During minimum an 8-inch x 10-inch durable plaque Construction for both of the relocated residences to identify their original locations and historical association with the Biane Winery. The plaques would be affixed to the residences in 3 a publicly viewable location. This would A preserve a historical tie between the r° residences and the winery, mitigating the loss 00 of their on-site historical association. o► 2) Complete Historic American Buildings Survey PD B Review of report D 2/4 (NABS 111). Prior to demolition or relocation of any contributing feature, the Biane Winery should be documented to Level III of HABS by a qualified professional. This documentation consists of the following: • A sketch plan depicting all extant PD B Review of report D 2/4 features on the winery property • Large format (4-inch x 5-inch negatives PD B Review of report D 2/4 at minimum) archival quality black-and- white photographs of exterior elevations, interior views, character-defining features, and context views • If available, copies of elevation PD B Review of report D 2/4 drawings, floor plans, measured drawings, historic photographs, and Page 4 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance -newspaper articles • Written data discussing the history and PD B Review of report D 2/4 development of the property. (The report prepared by LSA in 2008 will satisfy the --requirements for the written data 3) Copies of the HABS documentation should be 15D B Review of report D 2/4 submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, the Paul A. Biane branch of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library, the Norman F. Feldheym Library, and submitted to the State Office of Historic Preservation for approval before being submitted to the State archive or other appropriate repository. 4) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are-encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist A to monitor construction activities, to take 3 appropriate measures to protect or preserve 7q them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho 00 Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with P/D B/C Review of A/D Section 21083.2 Archeological Plans/Report During resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse Construction project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, Page 5 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date llnitials Non-Compliance including but not limited to, avoiding archeological sites, capping or covering site with soil, planning the site as.a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report, with original illustrations,. to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving.. 5) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or PD B Review of report A/D 4 animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor M construction activities, to take appropriate 3 measures to protect or preserve them for 7C study.- The paleontologist shall submit a r° report of findings that will also provide specific o°o recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained . PD B Review of report A/D 4 and equipped to allow the rapid removal. of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils. be found within an area BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Page 6 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Implementing Sanctions for Action for MonitoringFre uenc Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance • Prepare, identify, and curate all PD D Review of report D 3 recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino.County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of PD p Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected Review of report D 3 specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino Countv Museum. Section 6—Geology and Soils . 1) The site shall be treated with water or other BO C soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD During construction A 4 and RWQCB) daily to reduce PMI() emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept BO C During construction A according to a schedule established by the 4 3 City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with A vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may 90 vary depending upon the time of year of 00 construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when BO C During construction A q wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by BO C During construction A SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to q all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Section 7—Greenhouse Gas Emissions Short Term(Construction) GHG Emissions 1) The project must comply with all rules that BO C During construction A 4 assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWMD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing Page 7 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring ' F uenc Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select BO C During construction A 4 construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures' specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously .for more BO C During construction A 4 than.5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be ! BO C During construction A 4 utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to BO C During construction A 4 interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be BO C During construction A 4 3 supported and encouraged for construction 71� crew. Long Term(Operational) GHG Emissions C 1) Construction and Building materials shall be BO A During Construction C 2 produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound (VOC)materials.. 2) Design all buildings to exceed California BO A During Construction C 2 Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of: • Increased insulation • Limit air leakage through the structure • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances Page 8 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring -Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's)for outdoor lighting. 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation PD/BO strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape r+ Ordinance. m 3 • Use reclaimed water for landscaping A within the project if available and/or install r. the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets and waterless urinalstwater heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non-vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and CE A Review of plans C 2 demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educated employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Page 9 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring F uenc Verification Verification Date Ilnitials Non-Compliance Section 9—.Hydrology and Water Quality, Construction Activities 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following 3 measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing 3 of grading and construction to minimize soil 20 exposure to rainy periods experienced in N Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. 5) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the BO B/C/DReview of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the Ci Buildin Page 10 of 13 • • • Mitigation Measures No.i Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs BO B/C/D2/4 identified in the Water Quality Management Review of plans A/C Plan prepared by KCT Consultants, Inc. / February 19, 2013, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 3 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped Ro areas shall be monitored and maintained for r' at least two years to ensure adequate w coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. Grading Activities 1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the Ci of Rancho Cucamonga in Page 11 of 13 Mitigation Measures No.I Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/Initials Non-Compliance June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving BO B/C/DReview of plans A/C 2/4 permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Section 12—Noise Exterior 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans a BO C During construction A/C 4 construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and M approval. The Plan shall depict the location 3 of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. to 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise BO C During construction A 4 level at 60d8 or less during the hours of 10 PM until 7 AM. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or other similar objects between the hours of 10 PM and 7 AM in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. Interior 1) Construction or grading shall not take place BO C During construction A 4 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not BO C During construction A 4 exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as Page 12 of 13 Mitigation Measures No./ Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified s f o nctinoror Implementing Action for MonitoringFre uenc Verification Verification Date llnitials Sanctions Non-Compliance f measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed PD C as early as possible in the first phase. During construction A A 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place PO/BO C 3 between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. During construction A 417 on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any 20 time on Sunday or a national holiday. r- Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling Ln would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person AllonitorIng Frequemy llefhod.of VerlBCation _ Sanctions CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site inspection 1-Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit!Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(ReportslStudiesl Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Polios Captain or designee E-Operating FC-Fire Chief or designee 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds 6-Revoke CUP 7-Citation Page 13 of 13 . STATE OF CAI IFORNIA--MB NFC&TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY FDMUNDG.BROWN h..Govere� DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 8 PLANNING(MS 725) 464 WEST 4w STREET.66 FLOOR SAN BERNARDINO.CA 92401-1400 PHONE (909)383-4557 y pry Be eix�gy efAcfeeel FAX (909)383-5936 TTY (909)383-6300 December 20,2013 Mayuko Nakajima Assistant Planner,Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91729 Biane Business Park,08-SBD-10 P.M.7.519 Dear Mayuko Nakajima The California Department of Transportation reviewed the revised Trip Generation memorandum for the Biane Business Park Project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and there are no other pending issues ® with this project.You can proceed with this project. Thank you for providing us the opportunity to offer our comments to this project If you have any questions regarding this letter,please contact me at(909)-3834557 or Harish Rastogi at(909)383-6908 for assistance: Sincerely, DANIEL KOPULSKY Office Chief Community Planing/ocal Development Review ® "Cdv—heproves mobility oc%a Cafffo„aa- EXHIBIT E Item K&L96 IRBF ■ ■ A = Company MEMORANDUM To: Daniel Kapulsky, Office Chief of Community Planningkocal Development Review,Caltrans District 8 From: Bob Matson, RBF Consulting Date: October 15,2013 Subject: Biane Business Park Trip Generation Memorandum As you requested, this memorandum has been prepared to document the forecast trip generation of the currently proposed 122,304 square foot Biane Business Park project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga in•comparison to the previously proposed larger 240,740 square foot Biane Business Park project, which was found not to have a significant traffic impact at the nearby State Highway intersections in the vicinity of the project site. The proposed Biane Business Park is located at the former Biane Winery generally located south of a Street, west of Hermosa Avenue, and east of Archibald Avenue. Existing active tenant operations include storage, distribution,wholesaling banquet facility/food service,offices, machine shop,auto garage,computer repair,and residential use of three dwelling units. Currently Proposed Use The currently proposed Biane Business Park project consists of a 122,304 square foot light industrial warehouse building, which will displace 40,000 square foot of currently utilized warehouse space and three currently occupied single-family dwelling units on the project site to accommodate the new warehouse building. Previously Proposed Use The previously proposed Biane Business Park consisted of a 240,740 square foot light industrial warehouse that displaced the entire former Biane Winery land use. RBF Consulting prepared a traffic impact analysis for the proposed 240,740 square foot project site in August 2008. Based Item K&L97 Biane Business Park Trip Generation Memorandum October 15,2013 ison thresholds of significance established by Caltrans, the August 2008 traffic impact analysis resulted in a finding of no significant traffic impact at the study area State Highway intersections; the referenced traffic impact is contained in Attachment A of this memorandum. Project Trip Generation Currently Proposed Project Trip Generation To calculate trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project land use, Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE)trip generation rates were utilized. Table 1 summarizes the applicable ITE trip generation rates used to calculate the number of trips forecast to be generated by the currently proposed project. Table 1 ITE Trip Rates for Currently Proposed Project Site Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Land Use(ITE Code) Units Trip In Out Total In Out Total Rabe Light Industrial(110) Thousand 0.81 0.11 0.92 0.12 0.85 0.97 6.97 square feet Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual,9th n.2012. • Consistent with the SANBAG analysis methodology used in the August 2008 traffic impact analysis, industrial warehousing land use trip generation are converted to passenger car equivalents (PCE)due to the high percentage of truck trips typically associated with these land uses, hence,the following PCE factors were applied: • 2-axle truck= 1.5 PCE; • 3-axle truck=2 PCE;and • 4-axle or more truck=3 PCE. Table 2 summarizes vehicle-type split for light industrial land uses contained in Congestion Management Program for San Bemardino County (SANBAG, 2003) and utilized to convert forecast light industrial trip generation in vehicles to trip generation in PCE. Table 2 SANBAG Light Industrial Vehicle Splits Passenger Vehicle Trucks 2-axle 3-axle 4+axle 74.4% 8.4% 4.6% 12.6% Source:Congestion Management Program for San Bema►dino County(SANBAG, 2003) Table 3 summarizes the trips forecast to be generated by the currently proposed 122,304 2 Item K&L98 Biane Business Park Trip Generation Memorandum October 15,2013 square foot light industrial warehouse project utilizing the trip generation data shown in Table 1 and Table 2 and the PCE factors described above. Table 3 Forecast Trip Generation of Currently Proposed Project Land Use AM Peak Hour Trips PAA Peak No Trips Daily In . Out Total In out Total Trips 122.304-tsf Light Industrial -Passenger Vehicles 74 10 84 . 11 77 88 634 -Non-PCE-Adjusted 2-Axle Trucks 8 1 9 1 9 10 72 -Non-PCE-Adjusted 3-Axle Trucks 5 1 6 1 5 6 39 -Non-PCE-Adjusted 4-Axle Trucks 12 2 14 2 1 13 15 107 Total Non-PCE-Adjusted Trip Generation 99 14 113 1$ 104 119 852 122.304-tsf Light Industrial -Passenger Vehicles 74 10 84 11 77 a8 634 -PCE-Adjusted 2-Axle Trucks 12 2 14 2 14 16 108 -PCE-Adjusted 3-Axle Trucks 10 2 12 2 10 12 78 -PCE-Adjusted 4-Axle Trucks 1 36 6 42 1 8 1 39 1 45 321 Total PCE-Adjusled Trip Generation I 132. 20 152 1 21 1 140 1 161 1,141 Notes: tsf=thousand square feet;PCE=passenger car equivalent As shown in Table 3, the currently proposed 122,304 square foot project is forecast to generate approximately 1,141 daily PCE-adjusted trips, which include approximately 152 a.m. peak hour PCE-adjusted trips and approximately 161 p.m.peak hour PCE-adjusted trips. To determine the actual number of net new trips generated by the currently proposed project, existing trips associated with the displaced land uses should be subtracted from the forecast trip generation of the currently proposed project. Therefore, the forecast trip generation shown in Table 3 for the currently proposed 122,304 square foot project is conservative because it does not subtract trips generated by existing occupied land uses on the project site that will be displaced be the proposed project. Previously Proposed Project Trip Generation Consistent with the August 2008 traffic impact analysis, Table 4 summarizes the net forecast trip generation of the previously proposed 240,740 square foot project when accounting for trips associated with the displaced land uses. 3 Item M99 Biane Business Park Trip Generation Memorandum October 15,2013 • Table 4 Forecast PCE-Adjusted Net Trip Generation of Previously Proposed Project Land Use AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Dails In Out Total In Out Total Trip Proposed Project Site Land Uses 262 35 297 39 276 317 2,249 Existing Project Site Land Uses Displaced -4 -7 -11 -12 -6 -18 -180 Total Net Project Trip Generation 258 28 286 27 272 299 1 2,089 Source:Biane Business Park Project Traft Impact Analysis,RBF Consulting,August 2008. As shown in Table 4, when accounting for the displaced land uses, the previously proposed 240,740 square foot project was forecast to generate approximately 2,069 net new daily PCE- adjusted trips,which include approximately 286 net new a.m. peak hour PCE-adjusted trips and approximately 296 net new p.m. peak hour PCE-adjusted trips. Trip Generation Comparison Table 5 shows a trip generation comparison between the currently proposed 122,304 square foot project and the previously proposed 240,740 square foot project. Table 5 Trip Generation Comparison Between Currently and Previously Proposed Project Site Uses Description AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Daily In Out Total In Out Total Trips Currently Proposed Project Site Uses(PCE) 132 20 152 21 140 161 1,141 Previously Proposed Project Site Uses(PCE) -258 -28 -286 -27 -272 -299 -2,069 Net Difference -126 -8 -134 -6 -132 -138 -928 Note: PCE=passenger car equivalent As shown in Table 5,the currently proposed 122,304 square foot project when compared to the previously proposed 240,740 square foot project, is forecast to result in a net difference of approximately 928 less daily PCE-adjusted trips, which include approximately 134 less a.m. peak hour PCE-adjusted trips and approximately 138 less p.m. peak hour PCE-adjusted trips. Conclusions The currently proposed 122,304 square foot light industrial warehouse project is forecast to generate around half of the number of trips forecast to be generated by the previously proposed larger 240,740 square foot light industrial warehouse project. Since the currently proposed 122,304 square foot project is forecast to generate substantially less trips than the previously proposed 240,740 square foot project, which had no significant traffic impacts at the study area State Highway intersections based on Caltrans' thresholds of 4 Item K&I-100 Slane Business Pads Trip Generation Memorandum October 15,2013 significance, it can be concluded that the currently proposed less-trip generating 122,304 square foot project would also have no significant traffic impact at the State Highway intersections in the vicinity of the project site. Please contact me with any questions at 949.855.5736—Bob. lApdata100000100110t.911Temwi Cucamonp%awne Business ParklTr1pGen_Me=_10.15.2013.dm 5 Item K&I-101 RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 -A REQUEST TO MODIFY THE BIANE WINERY BY DEMOLISHING THE BOTTLING PLANT/WAREHOUSE AND DRY WINE BOTTLING ROOM TO CONSTRUCT A 122,304 SQUARE-FOOT INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING,ON 6.51 ACRES AT THE EXISTING BIANE WINERY SITE WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EIGHTH STREET, BETWEEN HERMOSA AND ARCHIBALD AVENUES; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. A. Recitals. 1. Jary Cockroft,for Biane Family Properties,filed an application for Development Review DRC2007-00951, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as"the application." 2. On January 22, 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The Planning Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution.are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 22, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the Planning Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a request to demolish the existing Bottling Plant/Warehouse and Dry Wine Bottling Room of the Biane Winery and construct an industrial warehouse building of 122,304 square feet; and b. The subject property is zoned General Industrial; and C. The property to the north is zoned Low Medium and is developed with the Santa Fe Railway and residential development north of the tracks; and,the properties to the south,' east, and west are zoned General Industrial and are developed with industrial/commercial buildings; and d. The subject site and street improvements are required as part of the approval process for Development Review DRC2007-00951. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to the Planning Commission during the above-referenced public hearing,and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above,the Planning Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and Item K&L102 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 2 b. The proposed use,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or the improvements in the vicinity; and c. The application, which contemplates operation of the proposed use, complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the Califomia Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination,a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter,City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration. and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA;and(ii)that,based on the imposition of mitigation measures,there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during the implementation of the project. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study,Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone(909)477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and the conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1,2,3,and 4 above,the Planning Commission hereby approves the application,subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions,attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Item K&L103 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 3 Planning Department: 1) Approval is for the demolition of the bottling plant/warehouse and dry wine bottling room and for the construction of an industrial warehouse building on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues-APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. 2) Install frontage improvements per the Engineering Services Department conditions. The historic spur line along the north side of the project shall be protected in place when undergrounding utilities within the right-of-way. 3) Apply for a historic landmark application for the remaining contributing features of the Biane Winery prior to a Building Permit issuance. 4) Prior to grading,offer the vines to any interested members of the public for the opportunity to replant them to an off-site location. 5) Prior to demolition or relocation of any contributing features of the Biane Winery, document to Level III of HABS by a qualified professional, as recommended in the Impacts Assessment by LSA. Contributing features include: Bottling Plant and Warehouse, Dry Wine Bottling Room, Wine Maker's Residence, and Office/Caretaker's Residence. The Cooperage Shop, Foreman's Residence, and the Lunch Shelter are non-contributors • (LSA-July 2009). 6) Upon demolition of the Bottling Plant and Warehouse,the west wall of the main winery building will be newly exposed. This west elevation shall be preserved as historically accurate as possible. Any new materials or additions to this structure will require separate review. 7) The costs to relocate the two contributing residences shall be bome by the owner. The owner shall notify the City in writing once the relocation plan has been finalized. 8) Prepare and affix identifying plaques to the relocated residences. This would consist of at a minimum an 8-inch by 10-inch durable plaque for both of the relocated residences to identify their original locations and historical association with the Biane Winery. The plaques would be affixed to the residences in a publicly viewable location. 9) All future Double-Detector Check(DDC)and Fire Department Connection (FDC)shall be screened per Section 17.48.050(A)(4)of the Development Code. 10) The lighting shall be designed to provide security in parking areas,loading, shipping, pathways, and working areas. Note: The height of the light fixtures shall not exceed the height of the shortest on-site building or 25 feet,whichever is less, be architecturally compatible with buildings,and be designed with confined illumination within the project site. Provide a minimum of 1-foot candle of lighting for parking areas,building entries,and other places where safety may be a concern. Item K&L104 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 4 11) Signs shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the building design and integrated in the building. Signs are conceptual and require separate review. 12) The project shall comply with the Industrial Performance Standards in Section 17.66.110 Class B. 13) The landscape architect will need to verify compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance(Ordinance 823)on the Final Landscape Plans. The evaporation rate required in the calculations can be found on the CIMIS web site: (http://wwwcimis.water.ca.aov/cimisfinfoEtoOverview.isp). The nearest measurement station is the Los Angeles Basin.— Pomona - #78). 14) Expansion of office use through a tenant improvement will not be permitted because of the parking spaces provided. 15) Print a copy of this Resolution of Approval on the plans when they are submitted for Plan Check. 16) The facility shall be maintained at all times, including making necessary repairs as needed and keeping the site free from trash and debris. In no event shall trash and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 17) The applicant shall obtain all the necessary permits from the Building and Safety Services Department. 18) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Conditions, Health Departments,Uniform Building Code,or any other City Ordinances. Enaineerina Services Department: 1) Process a Lot Line Adjustment prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 2) If additional right-of-way is needed on Eighth Street to provide 7 feet behind the curb face,it shall be dedicated by a separate document prior to or concurrent with the lot line adjustment. If the sidewalk easements are necessary at driveways,they can beAddicated at the same time. 3) Eighth Street frontage of the parcel being developed shall be in accordance with City"Local Industrial Street"standards as follows,except the existing curb and gutter may remain in its current location: Item K&L105 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 5 • a) Install a 6-foot curb adjacent sidewalk, and preserve the existing Crape Myrtle street trees. Install additional street trees as needed. Grade the parkway to slope at 2 percent toward the street. If necessary, to preserve the historic railroad tracks, install a curb or low retaining wall at the right-of-way line. The existing fencing shall be removed from the public right-of-way prior to City acceptance. b) Both of the driveways shall have commercial drive approaches (Standard Drawing 101 Type C)with sidewalks that cross at the 0" curb face. Provide sidewalk easements if necessary. The maximum curb return radius is 20 feet. c) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights. d) Install, replace, or protect in place the existing R26 "No Parking" signs and all traffic signing and striping as needed. 4) The Eighth Street plans shall show all new and existing street improvements, including street tree locations/species and the correct location and type of sidewalk. If possible, the existing City Drawing No. 849 may be revised. 5) A City project to repave Eighth Street is planned in 2013. During the first • two years after a City repaving project, more intensive trench repair than our minimum,per Standard Drawing 120,and/or overlays may be required. 6) The driveway accent paving shall be located outside of the public right-of-way. 7) For pads below streets, the first 6 feet of the driveway should slope away from the right-of-way (back of sidewalk) elevation at no more than 6 percent. 8) The existing overhead utilities(telecommunications and electrical,except for the 66 kV electrical) on the project side of Eighth Street shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage,extending to the first pole off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy,whichever occurs first. All services crossing Eighth Street shall be undergrounded at the same time. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development(redevelopment)as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. • Item K&L106 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 6 Building and Safety Services Department(Fire): 1) A Reciprocal Access Agreement is required for Fire Department access and/or water (fire) supply. The Reciprocal Access Agreement shall be recorded prior to Building Permit issuance. Mitigation Measures Air Quality(Short Term) 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and the projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Item K&L107 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 7 0 Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB))daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. Air Quality(Long Term) 1) Provide preferential parking to high occupancy vehicles and shuttle ® services. 2) Schedule truck deliveries and pickups during off-peak hours. 3) Improve thermal integrity of the buildings and reduce thermal load with automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 4) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 5) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planting programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 measure. 6) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 7) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 8) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 9) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 10) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply 9 p y with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Burning Item K&L108 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 8 Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices(i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Cultural Resources 1) Prepare and affix identifying plaques to the relocated residences. This would consist of at minimum an 8-inch by 10-inch durable plaque for both of the relocated residences to identify their original locations and historical association with the Biane Winery. The plaques would be affixed to the residences in a publicly viewable location. This would preserve a historical tie between the residences and the winery, mitigating the loss of their on- site historical association. 2) Complete Historic American Buildings Survey(HABS III). Prior to demolition or relocation of any contributing feature, the Biane Winery should be documented to Level III of HABS by a qualified professional. This documentation consists of the following: • A sketch plan depicting all extant features on the winery property, • Large format(4-inch by 5-inch negatives at minimum)archival quality black and white photographs of exterior elevations, interior views, character-defining features, and context views; • If available, copies of elevation drawings, floor plans, measured drawings, historic photographs, and newspaper articles; and • Written data discussing the history and development of the property. (The report prepared by LSA in 2008 will satisfy the requirements for the written data.) 3) Copies of the HABS documentation should be"submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,the Paul A.Biane branch of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library, the Norman F. Feldheym Library, and submitted to the State Office of Historic Preservation for approval before being submitted to the State archive or other appropriate repository. 4) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist,the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Item K&L109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 9 • • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory,evaluation,and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations,to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 5) If any paleontological resource(i.e.plant or animal fossils)are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e.,paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay,to the site full- time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded,divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare,identify,and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository(i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. ® 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Item K&L110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 10 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,o emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. Greenhouse Gas Emissions(Short Term) 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAW MD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contractor shall select construction equipment based on low-emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures'spec cation. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Altemative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline-or diesel-powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour traffic. 6) Rideshadng and transit incentives shall be supported.and encouraged for the construction crew. Greenhouse Gas Emissions(Long Term) 1) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use"Green Building Materials"such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled, and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low-volatile-organic-compound(VOC)materials. 2) Design all buildings to exceed Califomia Building Code Title 24 energy standard including, but not limited to, any combination of; • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and develop site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes(LED's)for outdoor lighting. Item K&L111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 11 3) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project.and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets,dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. • Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 4) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hydrology and Water Quality Construction Activities. • 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits,the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)specifically identifying Best Management Practices(BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b)An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction,to remove pollutants,street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. • 5) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices Item K&L112 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 12 (BMPs) to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Post-Construction Operational. 6) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by KCT Consultants, Inc. on February 19, 2013, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 7) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Grading 1) Prior to issuance of Building Permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 2) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained(i.e.,a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise(Exterior) 1) Prior to the .issuance of any grading plans a construction-related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) Business operations shall maintain a noise level at 60d or less during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. No loading and unloading activities including opening, closing, or other handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials,garbage cans,or other similar objects between the hours Item K&L113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 13 • of 10:00 0.00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. in a manner which would cause a noise disturbance to residential areas. Noise(Short Term) 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. • 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips(counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible,the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. • Item K&L114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-08 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951 January 22, 2014 Page 14 6. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett,- Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of January 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item K&L115 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONIDITIONS PROJECT#: DRC2007-00951 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: JARY COCKROFT FOR BIANE FAMILY PROPERTIES S/S OF EIGHTH STREET BETWEEN HERMOSA AND ARCHIBALD AVENUES LOCATION: APN: 0209-201-19 AND 20 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements comuletion Date • 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the Ci 9 9 City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No 14-08 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Mitigated Negative Declaration-$2,231.25 4. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. • 1 Item K&L116 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date B. Time Limits 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which / include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all / Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site,grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department(477-2800)prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 9. Trash receptacles)are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 10. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD)Standards. D. Building Design dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 2 Item K&L117. Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or ® projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. E. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang(e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. _/_1 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/recreational uses. 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. ® 5. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Manager, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. F. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 2. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development. G. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. • dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 3 Item K&L118 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date 2. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 3. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees-24-inch box or larger. 4. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 5. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 6. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or / greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 8. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 9. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 10. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-0f--way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 11. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. H. Signs 1. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 4 Item K&L119 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to ® installation of any signs. I. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. 2. In those instances requiring long term monitoring(i.e. beyond final certificate of occupancy), the applicant shall provide a written monitoring and reporting program to the Planning Manager prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said program shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. J. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. *APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). K. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning;and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and / • a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 5 Item K&I-120 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (LEEP)can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number(i.e., DRC2001-00001). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday �— through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 8. Construct trash enclosure(s)per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public �— counter). 9. Al commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 6 Item K&L121 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2-inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non- buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non-Buildable Easement,"which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. / 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's"high wind"instructions. 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 6. Roofing materials shall be Class"A." 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. 8. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. • 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with / the CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. L. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 7 Item K&L122 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date 5. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a Califomia licensed Civil Engineer. 6. If human remains are discovered on-site before or during grading, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety / Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 10. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 12. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owners to construct walls on property lines or provide a details) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed off-set from the property line. 13. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 14. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot off-set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. 15. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 16. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the current adopted California Building Code. 17. The final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 feet beyond the project boundary. 18. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill / combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 19. Provide documentation for CVWD sewer off-set program to the Building and Safety Official for review prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 8 Item K&L123 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date 20. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted / ® California Building Code. 21. The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of // Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit." 22. Grading Inspections: a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i. The bottom of the over-excavation; ii. Completion of rough grading - The grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Services Department front counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv. The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the • issuance of a Building Permit. 23. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices(BMP)devices. 24. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. M. Water Quality Management Plan 1. A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan"shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit 2. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of / Approval. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: N. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to / the City. O. Street Improvements • 1. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 g Item K&L124 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all,improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 2. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: / Curb a A.C. Side- Drive streetstreet Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Ughts Trees Trail Island Trail Other 8th Street (e) X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item._(e)curb adjacent. 3. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a /�— construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: �- 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specked. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City �— Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 10 Item K&L125 Project No. DRC2007-00951 . Completion Date g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall • be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first —/ plan check. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 5. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The /—/— completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet_(typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Stn Street Lagerstroemia, Pink Crape Myrtle 2' 20' 15 Fill hybrid"Biloxi" Hybrid O.C. Gal In Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services • Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 6. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. P. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and —/ Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. Q. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, �— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV(all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. /— • 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the —� Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 11 Item K&L126 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. �— Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. R. General Requirements.and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs �— for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior-to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative �- fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: S. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1-foot candle power. These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the �— buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. The lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. The lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal-resistant fixtures. T. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. —� 2. One-inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are �— within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. �- 4. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal �— gates, or alarmed. U. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the �— police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed because of a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 12 Item K&L127 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at • (909)477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. V. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be �— lifted from frame or track in any manner. 2. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. �- 3. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and —� impede entry to burglars. 4. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or �— prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. W. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They �— shall be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. 3. All developments shall submit an 8 V x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi- /— • tenant developments to the Police Department as approved by the Building and Safety Services Department. X. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and �— employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: (909)941-1488. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures&standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.citvofrc.us. Y. Industrial Fire Standard Conditions FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply Design Guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. • dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 13 Item K&I-128 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing �— water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 feet of �— the proposed project site. FSC-3 Pre-requisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC-4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC-5 Fire Alarm System &Sprinkler Monitoring 1. The current edition of California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard 9-3 require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a-sprinkler monitoring systema Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standards. Refer to the specked documents for the system requirements. FSC-6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard 5-1. 1. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1st story exterior wall shall be located within 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: /— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. C. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50 feet. dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 14 Item K&L129 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. te. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight(GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 feet, 6 inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways: -Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be provided as follows: a. In buildings without high-piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high-piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with —/— RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road /— shall be in accordance with Fire District Standards. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. C. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open,the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one-foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. ® i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 15 Item K&L130 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due . to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan �— illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly �— noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for plan review. 9. Roof Access: must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard. There shall —� be a means of fire department access from the exterior walls of the buildings on to the roofs of all commercial, industrial and multi-family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features,or high parapets that inhibit roof access. C. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required.for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC-10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits --- Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Aerosol Products • Magnesium Working • Application of Flammable Finishes • Motor Vehicle Fuel-Dispensing Operation • Automobile Wrecking Yards • Open Burning dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 16 Item K&L131 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date • Battery Systems • • Organic Coating • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Ovens • Cellulose Nitrate • Powder Coating • Compressed Gases • Public Assembly • Cryogenics • Pyrotechnical Special Effects • Dry Cleaning Plants • Radioactive Materials • Dust-Producing Processes and Operations • Refrigeration Systems • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • Flammable and Combustible Liquids • Rubbish Handling Operations • Fruit Ripening Plants • Spraying or Dipping Operations • Hazardous Materials ® • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • High-Pile Combustible Storage(HPS) • Tire Storage • Liquefied Petroleum Gases • Welding and Cutting Operations • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings • Wood Products/Lumber Yards FSC-11 Hazardous Materials–Submittal to the County of San Bernardino �— The San Bernardino County Fire Department shall review your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan for compliance with minimum standards. Contact the San Bernardino County Fire, Hazardous Materials Division at (909) 387-4631 for forms and assistance. The County Fire Department is the Cal/EPA Certified Unified Program Agency (COPA) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. If the facility is a NEW business, a Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department will not be finalized until the San Bernardino County Fire Department reviews your Business Emergency/Contingency Plan. California Government Code, Section 65850.2 prohibits the City from issuing a final Certificate of Occupancy unless the applicant has met or is meeting speck hazardous materials disclosure requirements. A Risk Management Program (RMP) may also be required if regulation substances are to be used or stored at the new facility. ® 2. Any business that operates on rented or leased property which is required to submit a plan is also required to submit a notice to the owner of the property in writing stating that the business is subject to the Business Emergency/Contingency Plan mandates and has dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 17 Item K&L132 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date complied with the provisions. The tenant must provide a copy of the Plan to the property owner within five(5)working days, if requested by the owner. FSC-12 Hazardous Materials-Submittal to Fire Construction Services /- 1. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC-13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal --- will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. FCS-14 Map Recordation ——— 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement– Please provide a permanent access agreement between �— the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant – Please provide a permanent maintenance and service _ covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants(fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FCS-15 Annexation of the Parcel Map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community --- Facilities District#85-1 or#88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS– Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, / specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 18 Item K&L133 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date • All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation,witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing /the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, .show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14 feet, 6 inches above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is / /— responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded /with the County of San Bernardino. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER • The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services'"Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION-Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler /— system(s)shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire �— sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately • following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 19 Item K&L134 Project No. DRC2007-00951 Completion Date 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be �— inspected, tested an&accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected,tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire =/ access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi-family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services.,. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the —� issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 %z" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. dre2007-00951 STND COND 1-22 20 Item K&L135 RESOLUTION NO. 14-09 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00475, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 24 TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00951, A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCT A 122,304 SQUARE-FOOT INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING ON 6.51 ACRES AT THE EXISTING BIANE WINERY SITE WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF EIGHTH STREET, BETWEEN HERMOSA AND ARCHIBALD AVENUES; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0209-201-19 AND 20. A. Recitals. 1. Jary Cockroft, for Biane Family Properties, filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00475 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of January 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on January 22, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Development Review DRC2007-00951; and b. The application applies to the existing Biane Winery site located on the south side of Eighth Street between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues-APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. c. The subject property is zoned General Industrial; and d. The property to the north is zoned Low Medium and is developed with the Santa Fe Railway and residential development north of the tracks; and,the properties to the south,east,and west are zoned General Industrial and are developed with industrial/commercial buildings; and e. The applicant proposes to remove 24 heritage trees including 7 Eucalyptus, 5 Peppers, 2 Cedars, 1 Oak, and 9 Eucalyptus windrow; and • f. The trees are not designated as historically significant; and Item K&L136 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-09 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00475 January 22, 2014 Page 2 g. The trees are not specifically noted in any Specific Plan;and h. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to grade the site and construct a future industrial building and associated improvements that will allow economic enjoyment of the property; and i. It is not necessary to remove the trees to construct required improvements within a flood control or utility right-of-way; and j. There are a significant number of mature trees within the surrounding neighborhood including citrus trees to the west and various species to the east. The existing Crape Myrtle street trees will remain, and most of the trees being removed are on-site and will not affect the established character of the area and the property values; and k. The trees cannot be preserved by pruning, proper maintenance, or relocated, rather than removal; and I. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and c. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed project,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not.be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study,City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record Item K&L137 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-09 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00475 January 22, 2014 Page 3 • before it,finds:(i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and(ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Manager of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone(909)477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. • Planning Department 1) Approval is for the removal of 24 heritage trees including 7 Eucalyptus, 5 Peppers,2 Cedars, 1 Oak,and 9 Eucalyptus windrow in conjunction with a proposal to construct an industrial warehouse building of 122,304 square feet in the General Industrial (GI) District located on the south side of Eighth Street, between Hermosa and Archibald Avenues-APN: 0209-201-19 and 20. 2) The trees that are removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a matching species of a minimum 15-gallon size. 3) The 9 Eucalyptus windrow being removed shall be replaced with Eucalyptus maculata (spotted gum), Eucalyptus nicholii, or other eucalyptus species as approved by the Planning Manager along the established grid pattern in fifteen(15)gallon size minimum spaced at eight feet(8 feet)on center and properly staked. The Final Landscape Plan shall indicate the location of the replacement Eucalyptus. 4) All Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2007-00951 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014. • PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Item K&I-138 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-09 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00475 January 22, 2014 Page 4 BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Bumett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of January 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item K&L139 14�e Cam PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-03 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00397 - STEVE SAGE January 22, 2014 Page 3 the walls shall include a decorative pilaster at each corner and adjacent to the gates. 3) The window and door surrounds shall either have a smooth stucco finish or be made of cast stone. 4) The rafter tails shall have a natural wood grained appearance. 5) The front door and the pedestrian garage access door shall be of a similar design to the proposed garage door and be complimentary to the Tuscan architectural design theme. 6) The stone veneer shall include a matching stone cap and not be stucco over foam. 7) The stone veneer shall be taken down to grade and not end above the weep screed. Ennineerin4 Services Department 1) Install drive approaches and street trees per City Standards or to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 2) Have a registered civil engineer revise City Drawing #1692 for the improvement(s) listed above prior to Building Permit issuance (plan check fees apply). 3) All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans. The public improvement plan shall govern if there is any discrepancy between the public and private improvement plans. 4) Prior to work being performed in the public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and an Engineering Construction Permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other required permits. 5) The following Development Impact fees are due prior to Building Permit issuance (fees subject to change): Beautification Fees: $808.20 per square foot Drainage Fees: $9,109.54 Park Fees: $4,396.00 Transportation Fees: $4,656.00 ' h SIGN-IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING RANCHO JANUARY 22, 2014 CMAMONGA NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL 14