Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-03-26-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF ;CHO cucAMoNGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 26, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California L CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell_ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz— Wimberly_ Oaxaca II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. s HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA A= MARCH 26, 2014 Page 2 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION' A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated February 26, 2014 B. Approval of Workshop Minutes dated February 26, 2014 IV:: PUBLII HEARINGS/PLANNING.COMMISSION - The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. C. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00508-CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING-A design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 126-room hotel and a site plan for a 3,000 square foot office pad within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and Haven Avenue-APN: 0210-081- 13. Related File: Tentative Parcel Map 19474. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. An Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. D. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19474-CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING-A request to create two parcels of land from one existing 2.97 acre parcel located within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue-APN: 0210-081-13. Related File: Development Review DRC2013-00508. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. An Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. V. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND. PLANNING COMMISSION r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MARCH 26, 2014 ` Page 3 FI[— VI. ADJOURNMENT 1, Gail Elwood, Office Specialist 11 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 20, 2014, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC • TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 • a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's t HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA A= MARCH 26, 2014 Page 4 decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us r' VicinityMap • Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting MARCH 26, 2014 e i c c V o E ° o _ t € r ' as U = Q 4 E I i � o CAo 19St Base Line I Bass Line /1r Church Church Foothill Foothill N 1 Arrow ES ° Arrow o J rssy�=E s a e 8th $ I 6th ° 6th w x 4th 4th * Meeting Location: City Hall/Councll Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive It•em A: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated February 26, 2014 Item B: Approval of Workshop Minutes dated February 26, 2014 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF �NCHO �,;UCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 26, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California r7I: CAL L To ORDER • Pledge f I e ge o Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz A Wimberly X Oaxaca X II: PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Item A-1 1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2014 °A Page 2 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of minutes dated February 12, 2014 Moved by Oaxaca, seconded by Wimberly to adopt the minutes as presented 4-0-1 (Munoz absent) EnIV. COMMISSION CONCERNS/.HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION None V. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned to the De Anza Room at 7:06 PM to discuss Pre- Application Review DRC2014-00016— WLC ARCHITECTS FOR CHARLES ZHANG. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. Item A-2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CR o�► FEBRUARY 26, 2014 Page 3 If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda,you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS • Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us THIS HIGHLIGHTED SECTION MAY BE REMOVED WHEN PREPARING THE ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES. • Item A-1 I 1 • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ;CHO CvcAMoNCA MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2014 - 7:00 PM City of Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center DE ANZA ROOM 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California FIF I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:10 PM • Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz A Wimberly X Oaxaca X It was noted that Commissioner Munoz'absence is excused for medical reasons. Additional staff present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager, Economic/Community Development;Mike Smith,Associate Planner;Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary. II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 71 This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity • which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Item B-1 i PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2014 Cfo CA Page 2 III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00016-WLC ARCHITECTS FOR CHARLES ZHANG: A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of the conceptual site plan and architecture of four(4)buildings with a combined floor area of 102,540 square feet on a vacant parcel of 30.3 acres at the northwest comer of the intersection of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive in the Mixed Use (MU) Development District. APN: 0208-331-40 and -47. Related file: Development Review DRCDR00-79 and SUBTT16179. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and briefly described the location and the proposed mixed use with 4 buildings. He noted handouts and illustrations have been made available (copy on file). He noted access points, fire access,the proposed roofing material,setbacks,building heights,and he described the building architectural style as a mix of modern and traditional architecture. He talked about the high quality, enhanced architecture that is expected in the Haven Overlay corridor. Frank Cuomo with WLC Architects said some of the initial comments received from staff have been addressed. He gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted elements of other developments such as Americana in Glendale and the Grove in Los Angeles have been referenced in this design proposal with items such as a parts,water features,trees, pathways and a strong focal point/plaza. He said the building placement framed by the interior park area draws and funnels the eye to the mountain views to the north and that they have been mindful of the view from City Hall into the development as well. He said the revised conceptual design includes wood enhancements to both the office buildings and the restaurants along with a stronger use of color. Commissioner Wimberly asked if-the use of glass has a sustainability property to it and if power is generated from them. He asked about pervious materials used for paving. Mr. Cuomo said the windows have fixed vertical fins to provide shading and articulation but no energy generation will occur from them. He said they should be able to retain much of the water on site with their plan and they are in discussions with Mathew Addington(Grading)regarding this. He said a 6-inch protruding ledge has been added to the sides of the office buildings to add dimension and more visual enhancement. He noted the parking ratio currently is at .33—and is short 50-60 spaces. He said they are hoping some will walk to the office to help mitigate the shortage. Item B=2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES FEBRUARY 26, 2014 oxc� Page 3 Mr. Zhang said they are trying to be respectful of what is best for the city. Chairman Howdyshell referred to Page A-3 of the agenda packet in section C of the staff report(referring to architecture). She said the concept may meet the requirement but that she did not see this design compatible with the existing development. She said it seems cold. She said she would prefer something less industrial and less contemporary. She said she would like to see it more like the European piazzas in Europe. She was approving of the water feature. She mentioned that she likes the design of the Lazy Dog restaurant. She said this design needs more "wow". She expressed a desire for a "hangout" type restaurant with an emphasis on walkability to the site and on the site to encourage use of the restaurants. Mr. Cuomo pointed out the enhancements on the restaurant buildings and said they can add additional wood shading elements on the restaurant buildings. He commented that they have taken cues from the City with a more progressive inclination towards the possible use of modem architecture. He suggested. more features on the site at the • ground/eye level rather than applying them on the buildings. He agreed they may add additional features to the buildings but suggested more eye level stone enhancements such as ledges. Vice Chairman Fletcher said he likes the park like setting and the walkways add value. He said he likes the restaurant buildings a little better with the recent enhancements. He said the office buildings have no articulation of roof or of the wall planes. His request is to make the office buildings more interesting. He asked if the 6-inch wall plane protrusion element would create a maintenance issue with water stains. He asked about lower level aprons and drought tolerant plants. Mr. Cuomo said they may add more deep overhangs and the entry portal elements on the office buildings may need to be grander. He said they could take their cues from top left example shown on the PowerPoint (slide# 11). He said they are mindful of water usage in the design. Commissioner Oaxaca said he leans towards modern architecture in Rancho Cucamonga. He said he likes the direction of the restaurant buildings and the mix of materials. He suggested more consistency in the context of the project in that it almost looks like two separate projects. He said there is a 'disconnect' on the approach used between the office buildings, the restaurants and the balance in the use of materials. He suggested corner treatments on the office buildings (refer to top left example on slide 11)to enhance those buildings. He also noted the long flat roofline and suggested it could be broken up with a varied height accent element. Item B-3 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES CcHo FEBRUARY 26, 201 Page 4 Charles Zhang,Zion Enterprises, commented that the elephant in the room is that north part of the existing project has not done well and there is no desire to continue that trend. He said the challenge is to marry the two but have it dynamic enough for them to stand alone. Mr. Smith asked the Commission for comments on the metal roof. Mr. Cuomo pointed out that they are proposing a standing seam metal roof—anodized grey in color. He said he would send additional photos of examples to staff. He noted the stucco on the buildings is a smoother, less stippled type of stucco. Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager, said with respect to the parking deficit that because of the greenspace and open area,continuity with existing development and the walkable nature of the development, staff would entertain an exception to the parking requirement. IV. ADJOURNMENT 8:15 PM If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. Item B-4 i ® PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES CR Ho FEBRUARY 26, 2014 ONOA Page 5 It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These • documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALSAny interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us r Item 6-5 J' STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: March 26, 2014 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19474 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING - A request to create two parcels of land from one existing 2.97-acre parcel located within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APN: 0210-081-13. Related File: Development Review DRC2013-00508. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING - A design review of building elevations and detailed Site Plan for the development of a 126-room hotel and a site plan for a 3,000 square foot office pad within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and 6th Street -APN: 0210-081-13. Related File: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19474. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning • Commission on October 22, 2008. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission 1) adopt an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts that was previously adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008, and 2) approve Design Review DRC2013-00508 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19474 by adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Existing Office Buildings; Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overlay District) South - Existing Office Buildings; Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overlay District) East - Existing Warehouse Building; Industrial Park West - Universal Technical Institute; Industrial Park (Haven Avenue Overlay District) B. General Plan Designations: Project Site -Industrial Park North - Industrial Park South - Industrial Park East - Industrial Park • West - Industrial Park 1 Item C,D1 ti PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19474 AND DRC2013-00508–CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. Immediately east of the project site is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Square Parking Spaces Spaces Type of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Hotel 94,669 sq. ft. 1/Unit+2 128 128 Office Space 3,750 sq.ft. 1/250 sq. ft. 15 15 ANALYSIS: A. Land Use Compatibility: Haven Avenue is the City's primary gateway corridor to and from the surrounding region, as well as the City's primary arterial for automobile and aviation connection points to interstate travel systems. Because of its location near the geographic center of the City and its function as a major north to south corridor with access opportunities to the Interstate 1-10 Freeway and Ontario International Airport, the City has a rare opportunity to enhance its image and identity by encouraging high-quality office development and complimentary land uses typically found in urban environments. The project will promote land use goals of the Industrial Park District within the Haven Avenue Overlay District by allowing for a hospitality use to be developed in close proximity to office, commercial and food uses that will maximize the economic position of the Haven Avenue corridor. Further, the proposed hotel meets the desired land use requirements and economic goals of the Haven Overlay District by offering transient occupancy to business travelers and visitors at a high visibility location on the City's primary north to south arterial. All of the adjacent land uses are compatible with the proposed hotel. B. Land Use Summary and Operations: The 126-room hotel will offer breakfast, pool and spa, outdoor barbeque, fire pit, and seating area with enhanced paving. The applicant's permit consultant, Consolidated Consulting, has indicated to staff that the hotel will offer the incidental serving of beer and wine. The Development Code permits the incidental serving of beer and wine in conjunction with the issuance of a Type 41 License from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). A Type 41 License (On Sale Beer and Wine—Eating Place) authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption on the licensed premises with the stipulation that the owner must operate and maintain the licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. Under a Type 41 License, minors are permitted on the premises. Condition of Approval No. 3 in the Draft Resolution of Approval requires that should the hotel operator wish to offer distilled spirits or operate a bar at a future date, the Development Code requires the filing of a Conditional Use Permit and the issuance of all applicable ABC License(s). Item C,D2 JI PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19474 AND DRC2013-00508—CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING • March 26, 2014 Page 3 C. Workforce Operations and Hours: The hotel operator anticipates that the hotel workforce will consist of 5 office/managerial employees (8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.); a housekeeping/maintenance team of 17 employees (8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.); front desk morning team (2 employees per shift from 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.); front desk afternoon team (2 employees per shift from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.) and 1 night auditor (11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). In total, depending on occupancy, the total number of employees at the hotel is estimated at 32. D. Architecture and Site Design: The applicant is proposing a four-story, 126-room hotel utilizing the following exterior materials: brushed metal, smooth stucco, ceramic tile (two shades, Tena and Lava), glass and E.I.F.S. (Exterior Insulation, Finishing System). The design includes a porte-cochere with a metal canopy, outdoor fireplace and trellis feature in the courtyard area near the pool, a basketball court, decorative concrete at the three driveway entrances, and a decorative street identification sign at the corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. The hotel design utilizes a warm contemporary design with a tower element in the center of the building that has a darker color to allow it to stand out and draw ones attention to the entrance that is located on the north side of the building on 6th Street. All pedestrian crosswalks are designed with decorative concrete. Sixth Street will also include an attractive bus shelter that incorporates design elements of the hotel. The trash enclosure takes its inspiration from the elements and features on the hotel. Berming has been utilized along the Haven Avenue and 6th Street frontages. E. Tentative Parcel Map: The applicant has also submitted a Tentative Parcel Map to divide the • 2.97-acre parcel into two lots. The second lot is approximately 0.51 acre and will contain the pad for an office. This subdivision meets the minimum requirements for a lot in the Industrial Park District which is 0.5 acre. F. Noise. Odor and Vibration: The proposed hotel will not create any noise, odor, or vibration that will negatively impact the adjacent land uses. G. Ground and Roof-Mounted Equipment: All roof-mounted equipment will be screened by the parapet walls and any ground-mounted equipment will be screened by enclosures architecturally designed to match the hotels design. H. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed on November 5, 2013 by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger). At the meeting, the applicant presented revised plans to try to satisfy the Major and Secondary Issues identified in the Design Review comments prepared by staff. The applicant was requested to enhance the building materials to a more sophisticated urban style rather than the residential concept that was being portrayed. The applicant brought in a material called "lexan" that the Committee entertained but requested that the applicant work with staff to integrate it into the architecture. The next issue the Committee cited was a request to redesign the comer element. The applicant brought in a new design that featured mounding the corner and terracing the plant material in front of the street identification sign with a pedestrian path located behind the sign to allow for walkability between the bus shelter and the two buildings on the site. • The Secondary Issues were addressed by utilizing berming where possible that did not interfere with the bio-swales that are utilized on the site for water quality purposes. The applicant also increased the colored concrete treatment to include all the driveway entrances Item C,D3 N PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19474 AND DRC2013-00508—CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 4 and the crosswalks. The Committee recommended that the applicant work with staff to review alternative building materials and to address possible changes to the Haven Avenue elevation including the comer treatment. The Committee requested staff to bring back this item to the Committee in the future. On February 18, 2014, the project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and Granger) for a second review. Between the first and second Design Review Committee meetings, the applicant worked with staff and added a ceramic tile as the second primary material on the building. The ceramic the comes in larger panels that are approximately 3 feet by 6 feet. The the will be installed around the first floor of the building. The material will be installed in two colors: the darker Lava color will be at the base and lighter Terra color panels will be stacked on top. The two north facing end towers will utilize the Terra colored panels on the second story to give it a more definitive base. Additionally, they included lighting around the top of the tower elements as well as larger metal reveals. Staff requested that the applicant provide conceptual elevations of the pad building situated along Haven Avenue. The office pad is 3,000 square feet with the proposed office building being 3,750 square feet. The elevations were requested to determine if the building would add visual interest to the corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street since the major architectural design elements of the hotel are oriented to 6th Street. The conceptual design of the office building incorporates elements from the hotel but is enhanced with more glass and metal. The office building will provide more visual interest to the Haven Avenue frontage. With the proposed elevation changes and new materials along with the addition of the office building, staffs concerns regarding the Haven Avenue elevation have been addressed. Based on the revisions presented by the applicant, the Committee recommended approval and that the project be forwarded on to the Planning Commission for review and action. I. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on November 5, 2013, and recommended that the applicant revise the plans to raise the grade elevation as the pad was too low and the site would be subject to flooding. The applicant resubmitted plans for Technical Review on February 18, 2014, and little changes were made. The applicant has since revised the plans to raise the pad and met all of Building and Safety Services Department and Engineering Department conditions to allow the project to move forward to Planning Commission for consideration. J. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 22, 2008, in connection with the City's approval of the Design Review of a 122-room hotel. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Item C,D4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19474 AND DRC2013-00508—CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING • March 26, 2014 Page 5 With the new project changes to include the office pad, staff has evaluated the development for the 126-room hotel and 3,750 square foot office use and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration based on revised Special Studies proposed for this project. The new project is similar in size as the previous approval and the new updated studies have identified only a minor change to the previous mitigation measures. This change is in accordance with the previous Mitigation Monitoring Program, but a revision to one of the Mitigation Measures now requires the site to be treated with water three times a day instead of once a day to reduce fine Particulate Matter Emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 during grading operations. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. The project is substantially the same as the previous project with the exception that four rooms and an addition of 669 square feet have been added, and a 3,000 square foot office pad has been added and included in the Addendum's analysis. The analysis concludes that the project will not have a significant increase on traffic or a significant impact on air quality. The updated studies indicate no new .significant effects that were not previously analyzed, and the Addendum to the original environmental mitigation monitoring program is minor. Therefore, • pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of the Design Review and Tentative Parcel Map and adopt an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts that was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Candyce"lbrnett Planning Manager CB:SF/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Plan Exhibit B - Elevations Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Aerial Photo Exhibit E - Grading Plan Exhibit F - Landscape Plan Exhibit G - Floor Plan • Exhibit H - Building Sections Exhibit I - Fire Access Plan Exhibit J - Trash Enclosure and a Bus Shelter Plan Item C_D5 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTPM19474 AND DRC2013-00508—CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 6 Exhibit K - Perspective Renderings Exhibit L - Design Review Action Comments (dated November 5, 2013) Exhibit M - Design Review Action Comments (dated February 18, 2014) Exhibit N - Previous Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program Exhibit O - Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration (dated October 22, 2008) Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2013-00508 Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19474 Item C,D6 now.. --momwommumnow. — � r�merinrt ,Flmmurtr —.own • - — X -—-— SIXTH STREET me Klmmuart mEETce�rmnr sJmffruort 05—.— ffid -ifW r ---- --------------------------------- -------- - adnwwEE,rEnc a.mi«ver.wE. � -------- --------- ------------ e ---- ;wr MEN - .aduoxo enwc. i0metr,rxr � met/omr.mx � mtwex DECELERATK7N LAKE_ _ - Aopr 1n�r I (P)d -.—��SSf (E)AESS . cxr DRIVE DRIVE I 8 ii}7i" ( 6I 6a ' li 5 �C ri q Isd', 3- 6 4 T 6 a rart mw riu etv.6mo o 126 PARKING SPACES 16 (LMe.aw I �"� !UOOgE vd a rd re ro rd a rr rd sotwun W I mn.. ■ t 6 6 4- ■ o oarortmc ■ ■I■ ■ 6 �1�,rr---��J�■ E ■NR61! EAS7M7 ADJACENT PROPERTY __.. ACCESS A PARKING LAT adensw� 'r� 6 (NOTA PART) Z I vg rtd ad ad ra as ' 66NE%. romarwn ._ -- ��ROP d ao PROP06E0 I 3.0000 41 r1: _.-- 116 ROOY.Fd1R6TORY ! m - T 17MKBG--- ROOENCENNNOTEL t I PSPACES d as 6— LOADING 1yl rray�jp~ 1� _ r ms cwa®nm �wir av[x®oMm li E `Inmmwrt I (PIACCE58 _ w.amnm , 12 1 12 - rrao. oumw rra . wDRIVE O mrm-y y 115 p-."p O O Maw I I ; (E)ACCESS DRNE (OIBIEMILE +� `muvnru---�rw,u 1\/\ //1 aaEsw ENS.N0 A0.MICEIRPROP6tTY �iginrtrar: .ru \,ywrtrolr rwu �,euortvotE �mwnro� IquortraeJ ACCE"ILPAIUMLOT (NOT A PMT) `— l J�■ui■ �a - - _VICINITY MAP PARKING INFORMATION LANDSCAPE INFORMATION SITE INFORMATION i r AREAAEYS R4770 REQUIRED PROVIDED PROPOSED PROPOSED 1 PARKING HOTEL: 126 KEYS 1.OIKEY 126 116 TOTAL SITE SIZE: 130,556 SF TOTAL SITE SIZE: 130,%6 SF rEa ACCESSIBLE SPACES SRE SIZE(MOTEL): 5 5 105,1975E BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA(HOTEL): 'S 474 SF SITE SIZE(RETAIL): 22,367 SF BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA(RETAIL): 3,000 PARKING RETAIL: 1,250 SF 1250 17 17 TOTAL LANDSCAPE COVERAGE: 74609 SF BUILDING SITE COVERAGE I%OF SITE): 21.6% ^� ACCESSIBLE SPACES: 1 I LANDSCAPE AREA(HOTEL): 26,ON SF MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT: 60� IANOSCAPE AREA(RETAIL): 10,725 SF MAX NUMBER OF STORIES 4 TOTAL: 119 1Q TOTAL LANDSCAPE COVERAGE(%OF SITE): 25% BUILDING SETBACKS: PROVIDED �+ TOTAL ACCESSIBLE SPACES: g S LANDSCAPE COVERAGE(MOTEL 21% HAVEN AVE.: 35 FT E. LANDSCAPE COVERAGE(RETAIL%) 45% SIXTH ST,: 96FT o�.ow BICYCLE SPACES: 5 S SRN:: 5FT NUMBER OF PARKING LOT TREES: 110 TREES REAR: 5 FT SCALE NTS PROJECT LOCATION ®' RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL SITE PLAN DKN HOTELS A-1 10501 SIXTH STREET SCALE:1•=2a JT 12021 01/30114 LEE 8 ARA SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITTECTSECTSAIA© RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 «�� ,Rarnnn , Lu M, 1� li 1 11 • . 11 1 e rr r NORTH Rol SOUTH ELEVATION(ROCKEFELLER PROFESIONAL CENTER) RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL ELEVATIONSDKN HOTELS A-6 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 • ONGA D- 00 0: jn�� SCALE: ltr=11-(r 12021 01130/14 ARCHITECTS AIAM ' , r l v I ipf4l t11�ILM r �D,r h ' r' z IF711 IT � H� 77 WEST ELEVATION(HAVEN AVENUE) WEST ELEVATION(COURTYARD) n iar ' • 1!i 4w1'� M1w _ Otic9rl�Fwn Woemf�- .;OPP .• - SiP�. i1V�FLr Sts Wr1 1-3i' -a9 :illi, lnl. T. I11 _ p f wlan� 1 us -�.Q47 '�N .��I wuartnc w�.artnc 1 EAST ELEVATION(DISTRIBUTION CENTER) EAST ELEVATION(COURTYARD) RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL ELEVATIONS DKN HOTELS A-7 LEE&SAKAHARA 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 SCALE: I/r-1*4r 12021 01W14 ARCHITECTS AIA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 -- - -- - --- --- ---- - - - ------ ------- own d j NORTH ELEVATION(6TH STREET WEST ELEVATION(HAVEN) i C o�- -- -- ----"*;F'Fm -- - ---- --------------- SOUTH ELEVATION(ROCKEFELLER) EAST ELEVATION(HOTEL) RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL RETAIL DKN HOTELS ELEVATIONS A-20 SCALE: 1/4'=1'A' 2021 01/30/14 LEE&SAKAHARA 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITECTS AIA© RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 , STATE OF CALIFORNI. ,ATY OF SAN BERNARDINO CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SITE UTILIZATION PLAN FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 19424 (DRC2013-00508) VICINITY m BEING THE WEST Yr OF LOT 20, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN QP.RO.JECTL-- r BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. COUTNY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO CUCAMONGA LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. DATE PREPARED: AUGUST, 2013 Aomrss• V LAVAL 2ESUP770N., .., n 6awom nrrw.ci awn a sw ecxruaa..o. I m +cx.a.cm.a.c m cw.or.uwz MYn�wr1 .i4�w e _ l+wtr+su'rWr1 ENGINEER: PABlO B. SANCHE2 DATE RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL R.C.E. 29664 EXP. 3-31-15 SITE UTILIZATION DKN HOTELS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19424 PLAN C4 10501 SIXTH STREET '2021 08/13/2013 FB&M it MMEMUNGr IIHC RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 404 S. 3RD STREET ALHAMBRA. CA 91801 L (626) 625-5648 PH. (626) 284-0432 FAX. Mr L1 ' .a. ! .— •� ��'`�� "P'r'y--�'. _�___••_ .. —. 1 alp �� .t � � � 1Q WaQ7r�C'2tlMIfS 1��ti� /��� •.�'�' �� r' IMid � ITT Alt ,il r 1 ' 4 zw_� _ v, I aNr•na.a.ns STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO VICINITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN (DRC2013-00508) BEING THE WEST Y2 OF LOT 20SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN ) BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY 'OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUTNY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO CUCAMONGA LANDS, AS PER PUT RECORDED IN BOOK ♦ OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. DATE PREPARED: NOVEMBER, 2013 .� SVLE'Ni$ 9V6ECTLXATM v[nvr ,os - - mj --------------- 4 14 1411 = � ►� ., I =�-=—x-------- ----_�- --__�__�--_ �rt � �.n, I I I urocw ER= wl[v.,d-O.,+,cr 40PCs — I� CA w_ "-.,Ate[ -- f PROPOSED 126 ROOM*OLRi STORY _. V nws�.osis• .. •' ' 11 RESIDENCE INN HOTELOtt 1; c� W r ' -- /1.114 AY[INL .'[a.,•,.w, lk I I as Q.IQIQIV- � °� - � 11 / 0 0 l r M ,r O J iiiiiiiij psi Ev UP Im llly wl,[,• ,MY K ,O®,sR a a ;r ENGINEER. PABLO B. SANCHEZ DATE RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL R.C.E 29664 FXP. 3-31-15 DKN HOTELS CONCEPTUAL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19424 GRADING PLAN C2 10501 SIXTH STREET 12021 08/1312013 PB M A F1 GPCIMM, NK RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 404 S. As REST ALWWBRA. CA 91601 (626) 625-5648 PH. (626) 284-0432 FAX s,K SMI1 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19424 PROJECT LOCATION BEING A SUBOMSION Of THE WEST 1/2 OF LOT 20.SECTION 13,TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH,RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN,IN THE Cf1Y OF RANCHO CUtlMHONGA,COIRIIY OF SIN NERNARpRq,STALE OF CALIFORNIA,ACCORONG TO CUCAMONGA LANDS,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK+IA YAPS,PAGE 9,RECORDS OF SAO COUNTI' IMM STgQ. m aG�I[ noRA as r.�¢p d-no w WATER CPIPMU_ `fid . ___y;�.__• '('6� �_ � — GA S. tau.a>-vo 'G��p„ m SE)FAGE OI'SPOS.AL .r a�wF we a�rs uvr OWAICa/btvn rota. a.. (D +'�• , • +r. ' /W C• . F Mts'w: PROJECT AOORM +_1 "-1 Z + + V-- �- ° tma,alr a +" + +� y c ( bsI Aon • +�., Her rr...aa1r anWL na +"� m� (`Cr J! + .F'�• v fw awoo m�r.�.u�vw• ,.� + a • m• ' +Z +.,+� LILU rAee Qe:ao.a...>,.ea.4a Rcca —sr— RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL DKN HOTELS TENTATIVE C_1 PARCEL MAP 10501 SIXTH STREET 06,18,2013 Pum AtA o+ormen Nc. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 (eTI)aasL.A r«. rya)m.-ws ru DESIGN -" - nLorc .aler� a 0 awo,Rmatwws,E � ` : aal w s%o%fl9anmaMa --pNleNw -pmerLwr pencr t Iw1L oalarnf. O1NE. � u1Ln,wlw erl:caelrleE,E1 LLBM. pellet-.... cam mewnl Qa EIm19Lor slnE rwa rw,LmEeo. uwa� ®1cce9rwww,LLaaro. -. .. - ®su,®t.faswEaoE. © ®PeoramllloE lwoL oorrrMel -amal,aR ,..marallw%e .-assmwn °1lN9 w,nN..wEw%sR 9E„eN 6TH ST. --------------------------- ---------------A __ ---- -------- wwuarLNRm 9Ofw%LEMG 9.N,a� 1 t a.raN® wora�o lwrn ,wwrue,rslalelawLLa a9mlE.epNq„ 01TLMe N1I11w11MLs PLANTA w,awn l = amlxrlal �,01p1"°i.cT�wnmi"aa 21 uu.as.nno.•.N'i..wu 19 spa 1�lv,wlwremrol ­amsmn .lUl /l;//,?l1 m.uwLa�'Rmcr o r'M IVY 14 if em '` 1 1 X11 i awmc.ffew,e—a ,1 NEN!FOUND an fT1EETT1a3 ,Q rIQ � i 9 - w.auawTm.woaou.ram,Eml Nla9a,w � ..� a A 14 t4Mw% H,p � W f?:,/} wnlwua N�ov%n.wane lrw.wul � •. /'•� /� ,r ern 9a / 1 � � avmme .ENDO i p� q mWl%CQMTIIEE IM CPIT%Kll w>T O � � L_ _ -(�Vq]�Cfl'T�1. 6V�YY aFA MOPAFa'rNAN,i1'.w1,1RtE810LrvFi '�7 . rllarlo Lor wlloE TaEe ® � 9.fr9a % - �. Luce rAlrroLlliwuE oaErr.olrclE ELN � - mot N•OO%!� °JB1¢ r'd"aneo" PROP0.4E0 PROPOSED E`t"mee"w°'EN^L"4 T,�E O 0 �, 3.000af 126 ROOM-FOUR ��pp „oµsga>1sa:rtrrL enwlrlE eo% ' .7 PAD STORY f��, svEcluE�Ls�cwrmrrnEt - - t0 11 RESIDENCE INN HOTEL 4 ,1�eLCf.`1iYA�' ,a.»%w wLaE w.ow.n vEE.w TnEE � � I, - `" to �aD%9a . to _--- i e � 1 nese. . ewiL�es 1Erl,alacrl•. , % ` t 1• P6ereaofllnua—„n oco 0100 wort ele,ow wirwilaly �r wmEl NwxunNnlew',nav,E£ows, wr.lao Lwewcl �. -65) ,OIL wa.rO O.C. AW9ILMITKL I f I ��—r IEUCOPIMIW rF%N19r.TElGB RAHIf11 I '! u-� __.� - ( walfGr 9111!1. k_ s oIL s�..aa c. r�wwnw wwEm�awarlu ® ;_. , - _ ^� -•f - ,. 1nI6N�Erv%,'llor rcvul w�wnaw< ® if \�/,�i'\�,./ i\L./ �l�,��/ �.•�•1/ %•f � I_� �� .% � r �. �•.i � • `_�+ f • �_• � 1 �.� .. 1asu re,l a,r,lo,ENlRr sera W i 1 . 1e - _ _nt - -- •-_ �..J —4111 a ra o c SITE PLAN `R, EXISTING ADJACENT PROPERTY ewc•.m> (E�AA:CE9S w11gE '•lMet9,[ '`au.arsE eren r,wwe f9sea ACCESS PARKING LOT ellanraE eras mua,rwlE •res ou,9wlE eXlw9r9E mulrrwE /:1 Lau1rNM TE%Iww.Tow Deur-r ® -9-c' 9-c. a a lowcEvnwL11r9MwpE w,w.R9 MHEOONIM9aNrtr aawocaEwwo elwlw wlfas RAWEAcrgy wraar,9rl TNfo,s9Rrwur / --'-- ••- -'�'---- � �- VICINITY vw,wrcoMo wrawmrLlTc.R ,Rarowwlrllr1raLlM,rooNM .9 M1oorI11r9E low "/. / MAP Mra OlrO C. ,%I/a,IN0 Kt6VNR ✓ eVElOI,E11T BRN,EaFE NO MR 1 lAl1T1N MOwlEMOdwf NaD wNH,VEi1aV �„] aNwniEtllR T[O MEaU6eGT e �11N, TOIENM9P11e�%flMiE , M18a,f O.O flrpYmlCM MME. rtt ` l euNltEueNmll,LaL was uoE 9D we191r1o1rlarr ,� f 09w.._ OIL as O a O.G M nl99cr wu r wlxeeNml A ' c a.b ,nw noNwawTnl ererw fu.NlalEal.NmMl u9c m atrrrw ofmNunewuleo +� l ,oIL.9rEON'Oc. calR9cu9w,LOwwgww•NRM, � � _ � � ,wr wseewloroe oe98rerae Lam 7`R •• ELNNII VY,N,IE ME � �1LR 01of 111s1Y„c - ..��• `F�' Elloal ,aIL b,ff O x•o.c alwelrmlt®,wa*mis„n ,u11EreEnalLna9a,Dano wn � 1TEa91mwM1�. -.y •k• _ 10M.&EEO N•Oe. 1'la faOCR NLL COI9LYNT11,f: �Kne�mllm mme Owib 1°e,PAO61ew^'°'. 1D"0a111A"� waeclr�e am�iw�eE M ENTRY DRIVE ENLMGEMENT SCALE NTS MECT LOCATION \ RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL CONCEPTUAL DKN HOTELS PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN ELEVATION LANDSCAPE PLAN L-1 eGLE:1M••,•a 10501 SIXTH STREET SCALE:I�WO 12021 WZ142I13 � LA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 4G1OOaNSM,fl„'rt> M.,K.1+1tM, W Fc uoss rL- TIT i �„ ..,z d w.ecnoAmaanx - SECOND FLOOR PLAN b GUEST ROOM LEGEND PROJECT DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 1 ABBREV. NAMEFLOOR 25,474 S.F. K-ST KING STUDIO GROUND S.F. r sum o� rcee. r anm mar mar goof ,m u saa. KST-C KING STUDIO CONNECTED 2ND 23,065 S.F. KSTADA KING STUDIO ADA 3RD 23,065 S.F. m.•ooaa �� K-1 BR KING ONE BEDROOM 4TH 23,D65 S.F. a. yes . qq��c� °"�"' K-1 BR END KING ONE BEDROOM END TOTAL 94,669 S.F. m J` K-1 BR ADA KING ONE BEDROOM ADA "'•.: " ; " ° rase DOST DOUBLE QUEEN STUDIO SITE S.F. DQ-ST ADA DOUBLE QUEEN STUDIO ADA DOABR DOUBLE QUEEN ONE BEDROOM BUILDING DATA " — DQ-1 BR ADA DOUBLE QUEEN ONE BEDROOM ADA 2-BR TWO BEDROOM BUILDING OCCUPANCY GROUPS �18,2-BR ADA TNA BEDROOM ADA TYPE OF CONSTRUCTIONA a- { �< GUEST ROOM MATRIX(KEYS) KST KST-C KST I-JBR K'-1BR K-1BR DQ-ST DQ-ST DQABRDQ-iBR 2-BR 2-BR TOTAL •r° FLOOR ADA END ADAADA ADA ADA <' a GROUND 4 4 1 1 3 1 4 1 118 2ND 13 4 1 2 4 - 8 1 2 - - 1 36 3RD 13 4 1 2 4 8 3 1 36 • 4TH 14 4 - 2 4 8 2 1 1 36 TOTAL 44 16 3 7 15 1 28 1 7 1 2 1 126 GROUND FLOOR PLAN RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL 1ST&2ND FLOOR DKN HOTELS PLANS A-2 10501 SIXTH STREET SCALE: 1/78'-1'-0' 2021 01/30/14 LEE&SAKAHARA L SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITECTS AIA© RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 - „ mrn ROOF PLAN d JT GUEST ROOM LEGEND GUEST ROOM LEGEND �V ABBREV. NAME ABBREV. NAME LD— °°° `^ '^ rom ou KST KING STUDIO DQ-ST DOUBLE QUEEN STUDIO �.1 w KST-C KING STUDIO CONNECTED DQ-ST ADA DOUBLE QUEEN STUDIO ADA KST ADA KING STUDIO ADA DQ-1 BR DOUBLE QUEEN ONE BEDROOM � K-18R KING ONE BEDROOM DQ-1BR ADA DOUBLE QUEEN ONE BEDROOM ADA K-1 BR END KING ONE BEDROOM END 2-BR TWO BEDROOM K-iBR ADA KING ONE BEDROOM ADA 2-BR ADA TWO BEDROOM ADA �. ir ooal ^ooar iw ooar' ^wm u, F GUEST ROOM MATRIX(KEYS) KST KST-C K-ST K-1BR K-1BR K-1BR DQ-ST DQ-ST 55-1BR66-1BR 2-BR 2-BR TOTAL FLOOR ADA END ADA ADA ADA ADA GROUND 4 4 1 1 3 1 4 M L JJ 18 2ND 13 4 1 2 4 8 1 2 1 36 —- -——� _...�_.4., 3RD 13 4 1 2 4 8 3 1 36 1 4TH U 4 2 4 8 2 1 1 36 TOTAL 44 16 3 7 15 1 28 1 7 1 2IT 1 126 THIRD AND FOURTH FLOOR PLANS RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL 3RD, 4TH&ROOF AKN HOTELS PLAN -3 SECTSEOTs 01130/14 LEE 8 TARA SCALE' 1/16--T-O- 12021 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 LEE& AIA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 w « s 204" :rte rd' 3-0• ra• rd r? 11.10• ea• 3'd• 9'a I ROOM I�-� 4 i BEptOOM ti LIVING ��:� WING It UWNG . Il-J BATH. --i'L !BATHaA ---I enrtno drrtnoMNe ! i! Evrrtvdx.c _ KING STUDIO KING STUDIO CONNECTING ADA-KING STUDIO 22W ted• ^^ e:o• rr 11'-0' 114• 2rr mx Tr I I —I� T 8A7H BED�400M it=o — § BATH UVING UVING �-- LIVING � � I EARRY,DIMNG ,- BEDROOMl '§" I BBEM&W L BATH f- �- "Ywn* KING 1 BR SUITE KING IBR SUITE END ADA-KING IBR END RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL UNIT PLANS DKN HOTELS A-4 10501 SIXTH STREET SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0' 12021 01/,020,4 LEE 8 ARA SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITTECTSECTSAIA© RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 23W Y-0' YdIV-$. 23'.0* 9r 3'� 1014- Z T :"A Ell ED �j T'I 17??m. t woR ODA# T OR M BEDROOM L E. BEDROOM LIVING UVWG LIVING LIVING LJ j BEDROOM -J. ENrRMDMM BATH DQ STUDIO ADA-DQ STUDIO DQ 1BR SUITE ADA-DO 1BR SUITE 3sr 3W if-4- rr- F MAS+SUITE UYING Zz MASTER SUITE Im to I i 's E3 "YANMM 2BR SUITE ADA 2BR SUITE RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL UNIT PLANS DKN HOTELS A-5 LEE&SAKAHARA 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 SCALE 114"z V-0- 12021 01/30/2014 ARCHITECTS AIA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 l ; RETAIL SECTION A RETAIL SECTION B AREA ■ Pao Y.r.... I: I STAIRS LEASE (� SPACE `+j\•'/�/ MECHANICAL li MECH. o LOUVERS MECHANICAL EQUIP MECH.EQUIP PARAPET VVELL �I l j COVERED PATIO GROUND FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL RETAIL PLANS& DKN HOTELS A-19 SECTIONS SCALE _ -o 02, D,/3D,A LEE&SAKAHARA 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITECTS AIA© RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 �E x w ----- --- -- _ ----- 9 1-114-1i Ila -tom '. 7 1., rn i r N". BUILDING SECTION SD.B BUILDING SECTION SD.0 r _....... --- - --- --- ----------- — -- "8!fo . toil - i I _ -11 n -T1 i i WIn I - '^'fib SUCTR STREET Fn III Ll ul ...r-- I-- lot ia. -- BUILDING SECTION SD-A -- RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL SECTIONS }^� DKN HOTELS A—V 10501 SIXTH STREET SCALE:Asindcated 2021 0130„y LEE&SAKAHARA SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITECTS AIA© RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730on�µWxxcraeus ,.SITE SECTION SD-F l s HAVEN AVENUE mnwu SITE SECTION SD-E SIXTH STREET I I II I., I I I RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL SITE SECTIONS DKN HOTELS -9 10501 SIXTH STREET SCALE:A.hdbaled ,202, 01/30!14 ARCHITECTS AAIAM SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ta RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 .__.. ,� r - STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ^ ° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA VICINITY FIRE ACCESS PLAN FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19424 (DRC2013-00508) BEING THE WEST)4 OF LOT 20, SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN ' BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUTNY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE ': + OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO CUCAMONGA LANDS, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. .. _ -- -DATE PREPARED: AUGUST, 2013 filln- -�qs SCNE:NiS RROJECi LOU*ION _ \ SIZE NFOR.AM ,�-,�CI•n�.. \ � ~�� � I__ - "��-10TH �P -- _ � ,er R<M ZE xru 1••-os'ymE�. - ! WASCAPE NFORMI11pN nsK TDM-- } - e }. 8� I .,oe mo,n•... 1 I 11•'1 __T- • ry.. 111`1+ I I .1 1 1 �I •1 + \ d,� }' 11 / lam./Y• ,/�_�'FI —KING INFORMATKIN 111 t, i 11'H1�11 - \\` -� PnorocEo}M"' I sywr, llu-'���� cessler is �nma lu�a�-gx�f0 - r 1 1 P oun nay' •� ��....� }�-„/, 5°"CE9' II /I Ai 1 y` `\RESUENOE MNMIEL___ + + 11j � I I 1111 jll / } \ w, �____-_ n'\\ i'• (I +.,e• / essalc .cEs:• + }� , '1 / +�• �i IIIT + jo , I 1 x x � i OR + " } - I IIII \ PE=1066.62 I °•"PE=1063.7¢ °1- +'-' 1 111 1 I I I PE=1063.22 PE+T882.e2 FF-1067.20 i I FF=1064.3p FF- -1 FF=1063.00 i 1111 /'// ,.oivnN.,TcasT p¢°Iwxllp to63.eo 1111 I I 1 } II ll +'-•. .' // -a,�mn,'/,.I.a•.u.nwi 1111 ,I 11 1111 I'I� i;G 111 j I 1 r\ a / I +� �+ + +�' I iii 1 �// � ,,-:w::r;•.(.e'':'1h, a�A. I ----.----- _ .. �+BA�,��1 .. ±r!•R- ice..,. .. '..xsr.a , ��n, /�+xx, xx.,,.�.,,o.xrx,roxo..c. � °''arxx�°, ' XOSE9 !so)' OIVNfs/0[VfLnsro ARCHITECT.' nxlx Al n r[mo �pl°yM'�je;am x w.°ra„enwul,xr rwalr ssnv. m awrn rl.•awn'Ir.srsmr I � 1 1 ��""w.,: k`.xw"� R''M'+'• aral�wox u f,o� �IELT IDDRE59 ^,��srrr srrtn HAVEN AVENUE .xec o1,o-oer-u-ovo "` °s"°:.n< • LEGAL iDESC 11/0N. ENGINEER::1 snr11 s fT l r PABLO B. SANCHEZ DATE R.C.E. 29664 IXP. 3-31-15 RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL �� �. I M FIRE ACCESS DKN HOTELS KTENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19424 PLAN C3 10501 SIXTH STREET 12021 08,13/2013 PBM A ENGINEERING, INC. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 ALHAMBRA, CA 91801 40 S. 3RD STREET (626) 625-5648 PH. (626) 284-0432 FAX. m 00 � T ROTE:ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE IS SUBJECT TO SEPERATE DISCRETIONARY H ANdOR SIGH PERM H REVIEW. �ZSOUTH ELEVATION(MON SIGN) � WEST ELEVATION(MON.SIGN) 4` - 4 n NORTH ELEVATION(POOL EQP) nEAST ELEVATION(POOL EQP.) (;1 SOUTH ELEVATION(POOL EQP) n WEST ELEVATION(POOL EQP.) as ma ma asAm6h &SITE PLAN(POOL TRELLIS) LEAST ELEVATION(POOL TRELLIS) nSOUTH ELEVATION(POOL TRELLIS) RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL SITE ELEVATIONS DKN HOTELS A-18 10501 SIXTH STREET SCALE:As indicated 12021 01/30/14 LEE 8 ARCHISAKAHTECTS SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITECTS AIA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SITE PLAN(BUS STOP) ORTH ELEVATION(BUS STOP) EAST ELEVATION(BUS STOP J{ sa ({ �l r.,, e ) SOUTH ELEVATION(BUS STOP) 5 WEST ELEVATION(BUS STOP) �... �L !L i ra f ra ra 4 V N SITE PLAN(RETAIL TRASH NORTH ELEVATION(RETAIL TRASH NEAST ELEVATION(RETAIL TRASH SOUTH ELEVATION(RETAIL TRASH WEST ELEVATION(RETAIL TRASH ENCLOSURE) �l ECLOSURE) � � �ZENCLOSURE) � ENCLOSURE) ��L xoV 1 MR 4 SITE PLAN(HOTEL TRASH NORTH ELEVATION(HOTEL TRASH EAST ELEVATION(HOTEL TRASH SOUTH ELEVATION(HOTEL TRASH WEST ELEVATION(HOTEL TRASH n ENCLOSURE) &l ENCLOSURE) ENCLOSURE) ENCLOSURE) ENCLOSURE) RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL SITE ELEVATIONS A-17 DKN HOTELS i LEE 8 ARA 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 SCALE. 1/4'=1'-0' 12021 01/30/14 ARCHITECTS AIA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 � R ,,. MFR t IFF 51%TN STREET 40000 RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL ISOMETRIC A-10 DKN HOTELS SCALE: 100'-0' 2021 01/30/14 LEE&SAKAHARA 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITECTS AIA© RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 1 �j I i IQ - 1 I -- SURK STREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL PERSPECTIVE A-11 DKN HOTELS SCALE: 1`=100'-0" 12021 01/30/14 ARCHITECTS AIA© HARA 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 MRS RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 .•.-�" �. -deme Ji ILI���• �, •� �� +�� ,,,���rY,4•-kms 0 _ ----------------- STREET. 1' p - a .r �1 I, RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL PERSPECTIVE DKN HOTELS A-13 SCALE_ 1'=100'-0' 12021 01/30/14 ARCHITECTS ALEE 8 SAKAHARA SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 IA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 MSR . __ 1 0501 SIXTH STREET _. �•: 1 i 'tom, " 5 t 4, _r Qt o 0, ,mSIREET RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL PERSPECTIVE DKN HOTELS A-14 LEE 8 SAKAHARA SCALE: 1'=100•-0' 12021 01130/14 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITECTS AIA RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 �°° E -- � I i L - 0- 1 SIXTH STREET 6 s RANCHO CUCAMONGA RESIDENCE INN HOTEL PERSPECTIVE DKN HOTELS A-15 10501 SIXTH STREET SCALE. 1'=100-0' 12021 01,70,14 LEE 8 SAKAHARA SUBTPM19474 DRC2013-00508 ARCHITECTS AIA RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 r "" s -- i _ l it • : SIXTH STREET r PERSPECTIVE HOTELSDKN • LEE SAKAHARA 10501 SIXTH STREET SUBTPM19474 - •: ARCHITECTS' RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 91730 4 4 r Sf ^' t Will �,•�': h��" � PIS A, { I • ` i r 'OF . F - tl- S a Y w f v - - � � � ,•--�'= 16'4. IL I' •i� Y ,i :J Y � J i d t 6 •�r � r n Amliff lAmmi tZ EL H n ♦.). ASM- ���+ �i L, y�v � r ;tin �'''� _ ► � ���� J+Y. , ' K � {r • • 7:00 p.m. Steve Fowler November 5, 2013 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING -A request to develop a 126-room hotel and a Site Plan review for a 3,000 square foot office pad within the Haven Overlay District, located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue -APN: 0210-081-13. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map 19474. Design Parameters: The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building; to the south is a multi-building office park; to the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair; and to the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. The Haven Avenue Overlay District requires exemplary, sophisticated urban office architecture, and site planning should promote a campus-like environment utilizing plazas, courtyards, and other pedestrian amenities. Architecture that makes strong use of glass, rich materials (granite, travertine, etc.), metal, recesses, openings, and portals are highly sought after, and vertical and horizontal articulation in the wall planes is required. Wood-framed structures and low, lineal buildings in the Haven Overlay District are discouraged. The use of stucco in the Haven Overlay District is strongly discouraged. Buildings must present the highest caliber of design and image along the City's primary north to south corridor. • The applicant is proposing a lot split of the 2.97-acre parcel into two parcels: one parcel will be 0.51 acre for an office building, and the other parcel will be 2.46 acres with a four-story, 126-room hotel. The applicant is proposing the four-story building on the larger parcel. The hotel will be utilizing the following exterior materials: anodized aluminum, smooth stucco, glass, and E.I.F.S (Exterior Insulation Finishing System.) The design includes a porte cochere with a metal canopy, outdoor fireplace, and trellis feature at the pool area and decorative concrete at two of the three entry points. The hotel design has a tower element on the north side of the building that is accented by a metal canopy to draw customers to the entrance. The design is also utilizing aluminum reveals to provide horizontal lines to give the structure visual interest. An attractive bus shelter that incorporates design elements of the hotel will also be included on 6th Street. The trash enclosure takes its inspiration from the tower elements and features of the hotel. The pool area incorporates the use of decorative pavement, fire pit, basketball court, and seating areas with a grill. The second parcel is approximately-0.51 acre and will contain a pad for a 3,000 square foot office. The signage for the site will be reviewed under a separate permit. The monument sign at the comer of 6th Street and Haven Avenue provides visual interest to the corner but requires more articulation. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. Overall, staff compliments the architectural design of the hotel. Since Haven Avenue is a gateway corridor, staff recommends the following enhancements be made in order to fulfill the requirement of two primary building materials and exemplary architecture: • Provide a different primary building material on the main tower and end towers. The lack of glass, metal, and/ or rich materials (granite, travertine, etc.) gives the building a more residential type feel rather than a sophisticated urban style that is required by the EXHIBIT L Item C.D36 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2013-00508—CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING November 5, 2013 Page 2 Haven Overlay. The hotel needs to be re-designed to meet this requirement in a manner that provides sophisticated, urban architecture that is well thought out. Token showings or tacked-on primary materials in limited quantities shall be avoided. 2. As noted above, both sophisticated architecture and exemplary site planning is required in the Haven Avenue Overlay District. Because of Haven Avenue being designated as a Special Boulevard and the high visibility of the corner, a plaza should be utilized to enhance the visual interest. Some of the following site features maybe utilized to upgrade the corner with placement of art or water feature, lighted bollards or use of ground uplighting, and terraced landscaped planters. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Provide berming along 6th Street and along Haven Avenue in the landscape areas adjacent to the street to minimize the view of the parking area. 2. The colored concrete entry treatment off both driveways should also be utilized to form the crosswalks. 3. The Monument sign should be redesigned to provide more visual interest at the corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue. It should be incorporated into a plaza area. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. All light fixtures shall have glare shields in order to confine the area of illumination within the project site. 2. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.) shall be uniform. 3. All signs shall meet the City's Sign Ordinance requirements. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review the project in light of the comments outlined above, the design requirements of the Haven Overlay District, and provide additional input and direction as needed. Staff recommends that the applicant work with staff to resolve the Major and Secondary design issues and return to the Design Review Committee for review prior to the project being scheduled for review by the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Steve Fowler The applicant and his team assisted in the presentation of the project as they introduced some changes to the project to address some of the issues indicated in the Design Review Committee Agenda. The Committee members reviewed the project and discussed each of the Major issues and Secondary issues listed in the report. Overall the Committee liked the design and layout of the project. They agreed that Item C.D37 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2013-00508— CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING ® November 5, 2013 Page 3 the design needed additional treatment to blend with the other architecture along the Haven Overlay. The following changes were proposed and agreed upon during the meeting: Major Issues: • The applicant introduced a new material to address Major Issue Number 1 by adding a material called Lexan to the front of the building near the entrance. The material is white in color and can be backlit to change colors at night. The Committee was interested in the material but asked that the applicant work with staff to find the appropriate location for the material on the building. The Committee also wanted to see what kind of lighting would be utilized on the building and what kind of effect it would have on the elevations. • The applicant introduced a more pedestrian friendly corner element at the corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street to address Major Issue Number 2. The new design introduced a monument sign with terraced landscaping and a meandering sidewalk behind the signs. The Committee made statements that the applicant should remove the sign and look at a plaza element or lush landscaping to provide a focal point and to draw attention to the hotel. Secondary Issues: • The applicant agreed to add berming in the landscape areas adjacent to the streets to reduce the view of the parking areas but said it would be limited because of the types of Best Management Practices they are using for water quality. • The applicant proposed expanding the colored concrete at the main entry off 6th Street to expand into the drop-off area. They also added the colored concrete at the east parking lot entrance and the crosswalks on-site. The Committee requested that the applicant work with staff to verify that the issues were addressed and to review the modifications and bring the project back to the Committee. Item C.D38 • 7:00 p.m. Steve Fowler February 18, 2014 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING - A request to develop a 126-room hotel and for a site plan review for a 3,000 square foot office pad within the Haven Overlay Zoning District, located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue - APN: 0210-081-13. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map 19474. Design Parameters: The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street; to the east is an existing warehouse building; to the south is a multi-building office park; to the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair, and to the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. The project is within the Haven Avenue Overlay Zoning District which requires exemplary, sophisticated urban office architecture. Site planning should promote an environment utilizing plazas, courtyards, and other pedestrian amenities. The project was previously reviewed by the Committee on November 5, 2013. At that meeting the following issues were discussed: Maior Issues(November 5. 2013, Meeting): 1. Overall, staff compliments the architectural design of the hotel. Since Haven Avenue is a gateway corridor, staff recommends the following enhancements be made in order to fulfill the requirement • of two primary building materials and exemplary architecture: • Provide a different primary building material on the main tower and end towers. The lack of glass, metal, and/ or rich materials (granite, travertine, etc.) gives the building a more residential type feel rather than a sophisticated urban style that is required by the Haven Overlay Zoning District. The hotel needs to be re-designed to meet this requirement in a manner that provides sophisticated, urban architecture that is well thought out. Token showings or tacked-on primary materials in limited quantities shall be avoided. 2. As noted above, both sophisticated architecture and exemplary site planning is required in the Haven Avenue Overlay Zoning District. Because of Haven Avenue being designated as a Special Boulevard and the high visibility of the corner, a plaza should be utilized to enhance the visual interest. Some of the following site features maybe utilized to upgrade the comer with the placement of art or water feature, lighted bollards, or the use of ground uplighting, and terraced landscaped planters. Secondary Issues(November 5 2013 Meeting): 1. Provide berming along 6th Street and along Haven Avenue in the landscape areas adjacent to the street to minimize the view of the parking area. 2. The colored concrete entry treatment off both driveways should also be utilized to form the crosswalks. 3. The monument sign should be redesigned to provide more visual interest at the comer of 6th Street and Haven Avenue. It should be incorporated into a plaza area. • Policy Issues (November 5 2013 Meeting): The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. EXHIBIT M Item C.D39 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2013-00508—CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING February 18, 2014 Page 2 1. All light fixtures shall have glare shields in order to confine the area of illumination within the project site. 2. All outdoor furniture (tables, benches, trash receptacles, bollards, etc.)shall be uniform. 3. All signs shall meet the City's Sign Ordinance requirements. Overall, the Committee liked the design and layout of the project. The Committee agreed that the design needed additional treatment to blend with the other architecture along the Haven Overlay Zoning District. The following changes were proposed and agreed upon during the November 5, 2013, meeting: Major Issues: • The applicant introduced a new material to address Major Issue Number 1 by adding a material called Lexan to the front of the building near the entrance. The material is white in color and can be backlit to change colors at night. The Committee was interested in the material, but asked that the applicant work with staff to find the appropriate location for the material on the building. The Committee also wanted to see what kind of lighting would be utilized on the building and what kind of effect it would have on the elevations. • The applicant introduced a more pedestrian friendly corner element at the comer of Haven Avenue and 6th Street to address Major Issue Number 2. The new design introduced a monument sign with terraced landscaping and a meandering sidewalk behind the signs. The Committee gave direction that the applicant should remove the sign and look at a plaza element or lush landscaping to provide a focal point and to draw attention to the hotel. Secondary Issues: • The applicant agreed to add berming in the landscape areas adjacent to the streets to reduce the view of the parking areas, but said it would be limited because of the types of Best Management Practices they are utilizing for water quality purposes. • The applicant proposed expanding the colored concrete at the main entry off 6th Street to expand into the drop-off area. The applicant also added the colored concrete at the east parking lot entrance and the crosswalks on-site. The Committee requested that the applicant work with staff to verify that the issues were addressed and to review the modifications and bring the project back to the Committee. Staff has worked with the applicant and changes have been made to the materials that are being utilized on the exterior of the building. The applicant has decided not to use the Lexan on the building, but instead replace it with porcelain tile. This new material will be utilized as a base at the bottom of the hotel. The two colors of the new porcelain material are Lava and Terra. These colors compliment the existing color scheme used by the applicant. Item C,D40 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2013-00508—CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING • February 18, 2014 Page 3 The color"War Eagle" used on the tower at the entrance of the building has been increased on the other towers at the corners of the building. On the front towers, the color has been increased to cover the first two floors and on the back side of the building the color has now been utilized on the major face of those tower elements. The applicant has also introduced a conceptual building design for the pad building, on the second parcel, that matches the architectural style of the hotel which has been included for review. This was done to illustrate how this building would visually block parts of the west side of the hotel building. Visibility loss would be minimal since there is more than a 60-foot separation between the two buildings. The applicant also included a pedestrian friendly redesign of the corner element at 6th Street and Haven Avenue. The redesign included terraced landscaping and sidewalks behind a street identification sign. The lush landscaping is in keeping with the landscaping around the site. The hotel will still be utilizing the following exterior materials: anodized aluminum, smooth stucco, glass, and E.I.F.S (Exterior Insulation Finishing System.) The design includes a porte cochere with a metal canopy, outdoor fireplace, and trellis feature at the pool area and decorative concrete at two of the three entry points. The hotel design has a tower element on the north side-of the building that is accented by a metal canopy to draw customers to the entrance. The design is also utilizing aluminum reveals to provide horizontal lines to give the structure visual interest. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. • Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. Overall, staff compliments the architectural design of the hotel. Since Haven Avenue is a gateway corridor, staff still has some concerns with the durability of the proposed materials and requests that the applicant provide evidence that the material will endure the elements since this is a highly visible corner within the Haven Avenue corridor. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. None at this time. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. None at this time. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee review the project in and the proposed materials and provide input and direction as needed. Desion Review Committee Action.- Members ction:Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Steve Fowler The Committee approved the project as presented. Item C.1341 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next lin Planning Division (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the-proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the. California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. INFORMATION:GENERAL INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project Title: Summerfield Suites .Name &Address of project owner(s): DKN Hotels, 540 Golden Circle Drive, Suite 214, Santa Ana, CA 92705 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor: Same as above Contact Person&Address: Gene ong Associates, Attn: Rand Ita a 1107 Glendon Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024 Name &Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): EXHIBIT IV Page 1 of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 0:06:00 PM Item C,D42 PROJECT INFORMATION & DESCRIPTION: Information indicated by an asterisk(')is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): Haven Avenue&6th Street(Southeast corner) 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0210-0.81-13-0000 '5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. lt.): 3.443 Acres 149,975 Sq. Ft. '6) Net Site Area (total site.size minus area of public streets 8 proposed dedications)': 3.05 Acres 1133,027 Sq.Ft. 7) Describe any proposed general plan amehdment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): N/A 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: Building&Safety Permit, Mechanical Permit Electrical Permit Plumbing Permit Grading Permit 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability,.plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site (including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information(i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): There are no existing structures on the site. The site is bare and vacant except for 3 mature trees located at the far West end nearby the existing sidewalk. The site's topography is relatively flat. Directly adjacent South of the site is another bare and vacant lot with no existing structures or trees EnvironmentallnfoForm GF.4.doc Page 2 of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6:06:00 PM Item C,D43 • 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books, published reports and oral history): There are no known cultural or historical aspects of the site. The site is currently a bare and vacant lot with an adjacent vacant lot to the South. r 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft, roadway noise, etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Medium traffic noise from Haven Avenue. Low to medium traffic noise from 6"'Street. Low traffic noise from the 10 Freeway which is approximately 1 mile South of site. Occasional various levels of aircraft noise from the Ontario Airport which is approximately 2 miles Southwest of the site. 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed 5-story 118 room Hotel Suite and a 2-story Office Building. Hotel to include a Porte Cochere, outdoor swimming pool and garden area. Office Building to have standard weekday office hours and closed weekends. Site to include shared surface parking for both buildings. Site to be landscaped per City requirements. One proposed driveway entrance off of Haven Avenue. Two proposed driveway entrances off of 6th Street. 18 Environmental InfoForm GFA.doc Page 3 of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6:06:00 PM Item C.D44 13) Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use(one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback,rear yard, etc.): The adjacent properties to the North, East, and West are 2 to 3-story commercial office buildings with surface parking and surrounded with landscape. The adjacent property to the South is an empty lot with no landscape or asphalt. The adjacent property South of this empty lot is another 2 to 3-story commercial office building with surface parking and surrounded with landscape.There is contraction currently in progress on the NorthWest corner of Haven Avenue and 6t"Street. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern, scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? The pattern, scale or character of the existing surrounding general area is generally contemporary commercial ranging from 1 to 5-stories so the proposed 5-story Hotel and the 2-story Office Building will be in accord with the existing surrounding general area. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated, including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Short term noise to be expected during construction of project from vehicles and construction workers. Contractor to provide some means of temporary sound barrier during construction. `16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: There are 3 existing mature trees located at the far West end of the site which may or may not be removed and/or replaced with new trees depending on City requirements and the Conceptual Landscape Plans. Environmental lnfoForm GFA.doc Page 4 of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6:06:00 PM Item C,D45 r 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: None. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gabday) Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gayday/ac) 3000.00 Peak use (gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank ® Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gal/day) b. Commercial/industnal(gal/day/ac) 2,000.00 • RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) Number of residential units: Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: Sale Price(s) $ to $ Rent(per month) $ to $ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: • Environmental lnfoForm GFA.doc Page 5 of 11 Created on 5/6/2007 6:06:00?M Item U46 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: Environmental lnfoForm_GFA.doc Pace 8 of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6:06:00 PM Item C,D47 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project., Contact the appropriate • School Districts as shown in Attachment B: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: c. Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Hotel rooms are either studios or one-bedroom suites with kitchenette. Dining and lounge facilities provided for complimentary meal service. Meeting rooms provided for conference or for complimentary meal service. Meeting rooms provided for conference or banquet functions. Office building provides multi- tenant spaces for standard office(non-medical) uses. 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: Hotel =84,752 Sq. Ft. Office=22,333 Sq. Ft. 27) Indicate hours of operation: • 24 hours for Hotel. Standard business hours for Office building 9:00am -5:00 M) +- 28) Number of employees: Total. 16 Maximum Shift: 8 Time of Maximum Shift: 8 am -4 pm 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications, including wage and salary ranges, as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): Room Attendant($8-$12); Building Engineer($12-$16); Front Desk($10-$15); Sales ($40,000/yr.); General Manager($60,000.-$85,000/yr.) 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: All '31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283): Construction vehicle emissions during construction. Standard vehicle emissions from employees and • guests Burin normal operations after completed contruction. Environ mental InfoForm_GFA.doc page 7 of 11 Created on 518/2007 6:06:00 PM Item C,D48 i Environmental lnfoForm_GFA.doc Paoe R of 11 Created on 5/8/2007 6:06:00 PM Item C,D49 ALL PROJECTS • 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. No contact yet. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use,storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides;fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as we// as the dates of use,'if known. According to theoffice of planning and research, state of California, this site is not located within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site (TBD ) ® 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic matenals, including but not limited to those examples listed above? it yes,provide an inventory ut ail such r,;aterials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. N/A I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 7/D a7 Signature: PF �o Title: iIICEiDGkrr Lr- Environmental lnfoForm_GFA.doc Page 9 of 11 - • Created on 5/8/2007 6:06:00 PM Item C,1350 1YIS YAP ISlaR IIA PURPOSE Ph. Cucamonga Fruit Lands, MB4/9 4/9 city of Rancho Cucamonga orto - 0 8 ar Aa YALOR(Y IAKAl10N ONE T. Ph. Tract No. 2244, M.B. 35/50-56 Tax Rate Area 15015 0 211 61C. 2 -�lB - - - `�-�� - - -- - - - - - - - - -� '� Par. l sl I6 __ - - T - - - - - - - iHFEfI- 4-�6 1� 31L6 �lzl � ✓• 436.43 200.9. ° r _ na Par. 2 !1 • Pof. 12 Or. +49 i I 68 !4 W ��9 - 2.-242 Ac. 1.41 Ac....: 59 Par.;A o v69.62 Par. S !! 71 0 45.2t I /� �,' a Pal.'2 ss t- Par. 6 J6 � O0 15'911- 62.61 {10.66 ar. T 37 J7 !934 36 16.615 AC. PaS6 r. 2 ✓ ' 2]i i6'- '( 11 SPI Par. 7 Par. 8 !e 1 3.60•AC. ? S �J,eA ----------- /0.16 AC. Por. - -- (21.968 ACq St �Par.l 3C: 17 ua.n 1 , Par. S 9.a - 16.397 AC. • 1e 7s Por. 3 _ A6 V v~ 436 2c. i Pln. For. 7 1.71 AC. _ � ;7 .111 AC.) ~U!J!____ Ja:as �LISryI' Po 1 Jo Par. 1 _ \q� =For. 4 for.JB 1 }7 1.19 AC.. 2 1, ti 1.01 AC. t 0 6a 1 Q' I sr7.n 2J Isn.rsl R 1 n , --6ti_9A 67.6' a 1.01 Ac..^ I Par. 2 �' A:.9, Par. S = d 40. 1 I e ,.';R4° Par. I 61 o Par. I IB '6s.p O 9.56At.2 Par. 912:-2 .• 40 71 6.2 AC. Q+ 1{1.71 $6.951 AC. J,rJ ) 1.51 AC.; 61 1 ;\ 5.14 AC. lje.,s 1. A- >>?1.97 AC. 0 U I 1 1 Par. 4 w0 8 2 1 - - j 3 4 Q V• 1 rr.o3 t`ay�K' .. 70.167 AC. P '^ E -1 ,t ,� Par. 3 Par. 2 ✓.7 I ^ (16.911 AC.) �,� •' rot U �.- I _ 10.71 Ac. =BiEN F{[-i'I n.oe Ac. sr.0 4, 101 I Par. 4 Por. 1 " I 76 7! • Par. 1 N 1 ,"as 1{ ^ 108 � ,Q • 1 4./ At. � 1. AC. 3'.f 5 1 - •AHMARK- T w I ✓° 1.9 �. -I_•�! Ja1.1/ I 503 ° 5. a ✓, Par. 4 _ 33 Q`► 1e. 4 At.30.99. 1 r6r.os ' Par. 5 S Par. S 7 4 Par. 3 Par. 2 , Par. 1 {0.'{�,�` ,• t a . _ e.s6 Ac. 4.36 AC. - 67 1pti 23.1' 3 9 71 220 ss CS I6 12.29 AC. - Q•�' is 5:62 AC. S Par. Pa 7 P .8 4.18 Ac. 5.24 Ac. 5 se 1. Ate I.o At. - 1 221. . •'e 1 i, n .s I w.43 112 is -20.43 - 1_ {e 41-H - - - - - 0-1- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - =S-IR{H 53 Y0 Parcel Yap No. 16313. P.Y. 711159-S3 Pin. Polcel Yap No. 16138. P.Y. 101/84-86 Pin. Polcel Yap No. 16745, P.Y. 101/48-50 REME0 Polcel Yap No. 15350. P.Y. 190/31-33 01/10/06 Kt Pin. Parcel Yap No. 14641, P.Y. 111/90-96 Polcel Yap No. 11473, P.Y. 171/69-71 Assessors Ma 94/04/06 ce P oeii of au Pin. Polcel Yap No. 9498. P.Y. 107/7-3 Parcel Yap No. 1]939, P.Y. 111/39-41 Pin. S.E.1/4, Sec. 13 Book 0210 Page 08 09/18/07 c. Oclober 2004 Polcel Mop No. 15536. P.Y. 193/5 B Polcel Yap N0. 11318, P.Y. 714/83-84 TAS., R.7 San Bernardino County 10/61/07 KA i+�• � X11 '� t R ����� ��''� 1 - �s•`s �J s z?1y, t "�4'e s't������ '��ff�'f¢. .r," �'s.. VIEW FROM •ROF 6TH STREET LOOKINGSOUTH VIEW FROM LOOKING WEST VIEW FROM •UTH LOOKING NORTH s 5-.- ""�Sa•••�.i;7»syv� m. �� ��� - � � sem.. gn VIEW $,S�rYa.MX1.s, �:,��,�".r�.-qs* a .. 1 C :ta � •rte.,,a FROM WEST •RAVEN AVE. LOOKING GUASTI, CALIF. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SE/4 ONTARIO 15' QUADRANGLE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES N3400—W11730/7.52452 If Ne Ir 447 R-7 W.(CUCAMONGA PEAK) 149 R.6 w u 1966 PHOTOREVISED 19131 36 It DMA 2452 11 SE—SERIES V895 —,330— w—Ir-11INNOW am 11 r—. BASE it tion well 4 It 0 It i j,— t 9 .......... ..s: —1230 Itit It viler M 1208 railer • art— ........... smell '--Y f 70—' ........... .......... Cucamonga //S0. Sch ima v ........... ' AT TOPEKA w sr Rochester EDER MResery i ir11 ............ 100 II Well 141 /0 well II Well It 050 1050 W611 it II 20. 16 It SAN EER D/NO RANCHO ZU15AXONGIC Y 0 BOUNDAR DResericr r item C.D53 GUASTI, CALIF. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SE/4 ONTARIO 15' QUADRANGLE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES N3400—W 11730/7.5 2452/1 NE 447 R.7 W.tcUCAMONSA PEAK) 149 R.6 W 1966 r PHOTOREVISED 1981 3 it DMA 2452 11 SE—SERIES V895U 330-- J) RIL BM 11 ROA r— V - t,on Well I A_ TI It L-130c, U) u- . .......... ........ -Tr- If _j A Lu lRce 1230 '--1220-- p • 1200 T* 4 L;NE IS • w lb- 1208 1__�B .......*' M If railer La. It err Ir II p N go (so 1170- t 70-11 II If • J" srIL cuca I J7 ST Roches�este, �jj E6ER 'EM-Reservoi II ................. ........................... —, V---/080 L Well 11 II IIJ 114 1 070— ell Well it LJ 0 IL __ff_ ........... 050 'j 1050 > 91-M. 1050 Well ;I II L s4_11�.BE97A ARDINO AVE, RANCHO ZU5AX_ BOUNDARY ------------ DReserv1pir It Item C,D53 City of Rancho Cucamonga • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: Development Review DRC2007-00542 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 - CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES - The design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 122-room hotel, with the incidental serving of beer and wine, totaling 94,000 square feet on 2.97 acres of land in the Industrial Park District (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District, located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street - APN: 0210-081-13. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: DKN Hotels, c/o Charles Joseph Associates 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 395 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 S. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park • 6. Zoning: Industrial Park(Subarea 6), Haven Overlay District 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a recently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Donald Granger, Associate Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report FEIR—Final Environmental Impact Report • NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG— Reactive Organic Gases Item C.D54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 2 PM,o-Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB-Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD-South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP-Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G-Urban Emissions Model 7G ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact'as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics (✓) Agricultural Resources (✓) Air Quality ( ) Biological Resources (V) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology& Soils (✓) Hazards&Waste Materials (✓) Hydrology&Water Quality ( ) Land Use&Planning ( ) Mineral Resources (✓) Noise (✓) Population & Housing ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation (✓) Transportation/Traffic ( ) Utilities&Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ( ) I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. () I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: C -fid Date: $ o5 Reviewed By: Date: $/ Item C,D55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 3 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No lffpact Inco ratad 1 act I EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project. a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? () () V) () b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) () () V) not limited to,trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or () () () V) quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, () () V) () which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) The project site is within a designated Special Boulevard and is located adjacent to a view corridor, Haven Avenue. It is the City's desire to have permanent locations within the City where scenic vistas of the foothills can be enjoyed. The four-story hotel buildings will have a setback of 139 feet from Haven Avenue and 92 feet from 6th Street, both of which are • classified as Special Boulevards. With the extra deep setbacks as described above, the view corridor will not be negatively impacted,views to the foothills and valleys will be preserved for recreational driving,and the impact will be less-than-significant. b) The project site contains rio scenic resources and no historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway. The project site is vacant. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. c) The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southwest corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a recently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant, with no existing trees or structures. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval. City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No.87-96, unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate vicinity. The design and placement of light fixtures will be shown on Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination within the project site. The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Item C.D56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No IrMact Incorporated Irma= Impact b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a () ( ) () (✓) Williamson Act contract? C) Involve other changes in the existing environment, () () () (✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a recently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant,with no existing trees or structures. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that are characterized by existing and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmlands parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan FEIR identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. c) The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a recently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant, with no existing trees or structures. The nearest agricultural use, a vineyard that is not actively being farmed, is located approximately 114 mile to the south. Therefore,no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the () () (✓) () applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ( ) (✓) () () substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of () () (✓) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Item C,D57 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 .Page 5 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No I act Incorporated Impact Im act d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (✓) () () concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial () ( ) () (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR, identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of development, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, construction worker vehicles, and energy use will generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. • Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis. As prescribed by SCAQMD, an air impact study was prepared by Urban Crossroads that utilizes the Urban Emissions Model URBEMIS 2007 methodology (version 9.2.4) to evaluate construction and operational emissions. As shown in Table 4-2 (page 27), the emissions associated with construction of the project under the worst case conditions are not expected to exceed pollutant thresholds established by the SCAQMD. The report estimates 997 daily vehicle trips generated daily associated with the operation of the project. As shown in Table 4-3 (page 30), the results of the analysis indicate that project-related emissions for operational emissions will not exceed the regional pollutant criteria thresholds established by the SCAQMD. In addition, localized significance thresholds (LSTs) were analyzed in the air quality analysis by Urban Crossroads. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent federal or state ambient air quality standard at the nearest receptor. LSTs are set based on ambient concentrations in the project area, and the distance to the closest sensitive receptors. Localized construction impacts were not analyzed in the City's General Plan EIR. LST emissions for construction and operations are shown in Tables 4-4 and 4-5, Pages 33 and 34, respectively. As shown in the Tables 4-4 and 4-5, the results indicate that the project does not exceed screening level LSTs for construction and operation. The project is not expected to have a significant localized impact. • Therefore, as required by the SCAQMD, an URBEMIS 2007 study was performed calculate project emissions, and the model results indicate that construction and operational emissions of the proposed project would not be significant. The construction and operational Item C,D58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 6 Lm Than significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially win, Than Significant With Significant No Invact incorporated IrrPact InVact emissions of the project are below regional and localized significance thresholds for criteria pollutants as indicated in Tables 4-2 and 4-3. The full text and appendix (model outputs are located in the appendix) of the URBEMIS 2007 focused air quality study can be referenced at the end of the Initial Study Part II. CO Hot Soot Analysis: A CO hotspot is a localized concentration of carbon monoxide that is above State and/or Federal 1-hour or 8-hour ambient air standards that is generally associated with idling or slow moving traffic. Based on SCAOMD guidance, it is recommended that a CO hotspot analysis be performed if the project meets either of the following two conditions: 1) The volume to capacity ratio increases by two percent or more as a result of a proposed project for intersections rated Level of Service (LOS) D or worse, or if the LOS declines from C to D;or 2)The LOS declines from A, B or C to D, E or F. The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Traffic Division has determined that the proposed hotel project does not warrant a traffic impact analysis, since it does not have the potential to generate significant traffic on local roadways. Therefore, because the project does not have the potential to significantly affect local roadways and intersections, background CO levels in the project area are low, and project-generated traffic does not have the potential to create a CO hotspot. The air quality analysis by Urban Crossroads indicates that impacts to CO hotspots are considered less-than-significant. Global Climate Change Analysis: On June 1, 2005, through Executive Order S-3-05, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger mandated Green House Gas (GHG) reduction targets as follows: by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; by 2020 reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; by 2050 reduce GHG emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels. In 2006, Assembly Bill 32(AB32), the California Global Warming Solutions Act, was signed,into law by Governor Schwarzenegger,giving the California Air Resources Board(CARE) primary responsibility for reducing statewide greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. The place of climate change in the CERA process was acknowledged in August of 2007 with the approval of Senate Bill 97 (SB97). SB97 gives the Office of Planning and Research (OPR) the authority to draft CEQA guidelines for addressing global climate change, and requires OPR to develop guidelines for the feasible mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions or the effects of greenhouse gas emissions by July 2009, and these must be adopted by the Resource Agency by January 2010. Although SB97 does not protect public agencies from CEQA challenges, limits are placed on CEQA challenges for certain infrastructure projects financed by Propositions 1 B and 1 E. Carbon dioxide emissions associated with the development and operation of the proposed project were estimated using the URBEMIS 2007 model, and include emissions resulting from project construction, project-generated traffic, project natural gas use, and emissions resulting from gasoline powered landscape maintenance equipment. Based on project greenhouse gas emissions estimates, it is not anticipated that the proposed hotel project alone would substantially contribute to global greenhouse gas emissions inventories. It is estimated that long-term project operations will result in emissions of approximately 1,748.55 metric tons per year of CO2. Compared to California's estimated 2004 greenhouse gas emissions of approximately 492 million metric tons, the contribution of the project would represent 0.00036 percent of statewide emissions. Therefore, the project would not have a significant impact upon global climate change. Further, the project will be required to comply with Title 24, thereby increasing building energy and water use efficiency, resulting in a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. The project is consistent with SCAQMD's 2007 AQMP, as well as growth forecasts for the area. Therefore, the incremental contribution to criteria pollutants of the project is not considered cumulatively significant. Itpm C rAq Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 7 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than SignificantMifigatton Significant No Invact Inco rated Impao Wood Even though the construction and long-term operational emissions will be less than SCAOMD's regional and localized standards, the project will be conditioned to implement the following mitigation measures per the City's General Plan FEIR in order further reduce actual emissions: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment Is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAOMD)as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. • 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAOMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAOMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. ® • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. Item U60 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wnn Than PP 9 significant MNlgadon Significant No Impact IncerporaW Impact Invact 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Duality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM10)emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RW0CB)shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures,short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon the Urban Emissions Model 7G (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR), Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and Fine Particulate Matter (PM10) would exceed SCAOMD thresholds for significance; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would result in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 10) All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods(i.e.,in excess of 10 minutes). 11) All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate preferential parking for vanpools. 12) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to post both bus and Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. 13) All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. 14) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 15) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in operational emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. Item C,D61 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 9 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact lincorporated Impact "'Z.]act C) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FOR was prepared and impacts evaluated. See also discussion, analysis, and mitigation measures under b) above. d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the following as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers,and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1/4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located more than a 1/4 mile from the nearest sensitive receptor. However, during construction, there is the possibility of fugitive dust to be generated from grading the site. See also discussion, analysis, and mitigation measures under 'b) above. The mitigation measures listed under b) above will reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. e) Typically, hotel uses do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or () { ) () (✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat ( ) () { ) (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C ) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally () () ( ) (✓) protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () ( ) ( ) (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances () ( ) ( ) (✓) • protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Item C,D62 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 10 Less Than S17dic-ant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: Po�ir With Than pp g SigtrifietiM AAltipafion Significant No IrMaM IncomoraW Irmact I as f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat () () () (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area that is substantially developed with warehouse, office, industrial, and office parks. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR,the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, the hotel project will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Additionally, no known sensitive habitats are located nearby the project site. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, nor are there any rivers or seasonal streams/ponds. No adverse impacts are anticipated.. c) No wetland habitat is present on-site. No riparian habitat exists on-site, nor are there any rivers or seasonal streams/ponds. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No riparian habitat exists on-site, nor are there any rivers or seasonal streams/ponds. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are no heritage trees on the project site; therefore, the proposed project is not in conflict with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. f) The project site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () () ( ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the () (✓) ( ) () significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) () resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) () ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Item C.D63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 11 • Lass Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Signilicant Mitigadon Significant No Irmact Inco rated IrMav 1 Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a"Historic Resource" per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24(Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FOR (Section 5.11). Construction activity,particularly grading, soil excavation, and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources,following appropriate CE0A guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting .the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no paleontological sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last 'Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered • before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings Item C,D64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 12 Less Than significant Low Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P°'�fd8With Than Signitieartnt Mitigation Significant No InVaW Inmrporated Irmam Iftow that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. 0 Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). 0 Submit a summary report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all development, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. S. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as () () () (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? () ( } () (✓) iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including () ( ) () (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? () () () (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? () (✓) () ( ) Item C.D65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Invad Incorporated Impact I act C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, () () ( ) (✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table () () () (✓) 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use () () ( ) (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault,according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 3 miles north of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 6 miles north of the project site. These faults are both capable of producing M,w 6.0-7.0 earthquakes. Also, the San Jacinto Fault, capable of producing up to MM,7.5 earthquakes, is located approximately 14 miles northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas Fault, capable of up to MN, 8.2 earthquakes, is located approximately 16 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong groundshaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. b) The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with.water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers(approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB)shall be applied to • all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Itcm r nr%f; Initial Study for. City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 14 Less Than lnvW Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: � M;goon No M! I act I act c) The General Plan FOR (Section 5.1) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga loamy sand according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils typically have slopes that range from 0 to 5 percent. Runoff for Tujunga soils is slow to very slow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga loamy sand according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FOR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils typically have slopes that range from 0 to 5 percent. Runoff for Tujunga soils is slow to very slow. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to and be served by the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () () ( ) (✓) environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the () ( ) () (✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or () ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of () ( ) ( ) (✓) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () ( ) ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () ( ) () (✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementationof or physically interfere with an () ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () ( ) (✓) ( ) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Item C.D67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 15 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Sigrdficant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Irmam Comments: a) The project will not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or volatile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. • c) There are no schools located within 1/4 mile of the project site. The project site is located approximately 1 mile from the nearest school. Typically, the hotels do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. Recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan, but is within 2 miles of a public airport, Ontario Airport. However, the project site is located approximately 1.25 mile northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Plan, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7. Fire Construction Services is requiring that the project be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system, a listed Central Station Fire Alarm system that will monitor the fire sprinkler system and an automatic/manual fire • alarm system prior to occupancy. With the imposition and installation of these fire detection and suppression systems,the impact is considered less-than-significant. Item C.D68 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyignifnt "'"" Than Significant Mitigation significant No I Incorporated [1110= I 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge () () (✓) () requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere () () () (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () ( ) () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the () () () (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on-or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed () () () (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? () () () (✓) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as () () () (✓) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () () () (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of () () () (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? r77) Inundation by seiche,tsunami, or mudflow? () () () (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES Permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Item C.D69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Invact Inco rated Impact Iffyact Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction Permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Construction Permit. The General Construction Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES Permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). To comply with the NPDES, the construction contractor of the project will be required to prepare a SWPPP during • construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by TGA Development and Engineering, Inc. that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and various business plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the storm drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to Item C.D70 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Potentially " ti ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant nt No InVW incorporated Imaili ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post-Construction Operational.• 5) The developer shall implement the SMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan(WOMP),prepared by TGA Development and Engineering, Inc., to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizerstpesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. b) According to CVWD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from groundwater in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVWD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030. The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will increase water needs and is a significant impact; however, CVWD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, the project will. not result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. . d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. itam r nmt Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiatty with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact I Irnpact e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on-or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development(hotel); therefore, it is required to comply with the NPDES to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 7) Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a WOMP, including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WOMP shall Identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 8) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. Additionally,the proposed project is a hotel and will not include any housing. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. i) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. j) There are no oceans, lakes, or reservoirs near the project site;therefore, impacts from seiche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. • Item C,D72 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 20 Less Than Signmcam Less polemially With ThanIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Sigifcam Mitigation SigniBcBM No Irroact Inco rated Imam Impact 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project. a) Physically divide an established community? () () () (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or () () () (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan () () () (✓) or natural community conservation plan? Comments: a) The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southwest comer of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a recently-completed multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant, with no existing trees or structures. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. This project will be of similar design and size to the surrounding area and land uses (office, commercial, and industrial). The project will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Industrial Park, which permits hotels subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. c) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral () () () (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important () ( ) () (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1;therefore,there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable mineral resource recovery site;therefore,there is no impact. Item C.D73 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 21 • Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: sign""ant "'"" .Than Significant Mitigation Significant NO ItMact Inco rated Invact Irmact 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in () (✓) () () excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive () () () (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise () () (✓) () levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in () (✓) () () ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, () () ( ) (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? • f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, () () ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing.or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. Directly north of the project site is 6th Street, and directly west is Haven Avenue. Both Haven Avenue and 6th Street are classified as Major Divided Arterials. The project site (hotel) is subject to traffic noise levels of 60dBA within 500 feet of the centerline of Haven Avenue and within 146 feet of the centerline of 6th Street. Accordingly, a noise analysis was completed by Urban Crossroads (June 2008) to analyze interior noise levels and how the hotel could meet the following standard: 45dBA interior from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 40dBA interior from 10 p.m.to 7 a.m. The noise study states that the traffic predication noise model indicates that exterior noise levels at the building fagade will range from 61.9 to 66.9 dBA Ldn. With a windows closed condition and dual glazing with a minimum rating of STC 26 or higher for all guest rooms, the interior noise levels will range from 30.8 to 35.8 dBA Ldn, meeting the City's interior noise level requirement of 45dBA interior from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. and 40dBA interior from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.. Mitigation measures listed below would reduce interior noise levels to less-than-significant levels: 1) Interior: All windows for all guest rooms shall be dual-glazed and shall have a minimum STC rating of 26 or higher. b) Hotel uses do not induce ground borne vibrations. As such, no impacts are anticipated. • c) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence, are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. Item C.D74 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Potentially With ThanIssues and'Supporting Information Sources: Significant Migabon Significant No imp= Inco rated Invact. Irmect d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) indicates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 2) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 3) The construction contractor shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with property operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with the manufacturer's standards. 4) The construction contractor shall place all stationary equipment so that emitted noise Is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 5) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 6) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced In intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris. The following mitigation measures shall then be required: 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible,the Plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The site is located approximately 1.25 mile northeasterly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. Q The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2.5 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. Item C,D75 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 23 Less Than Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Nfiffgation Significant No Impact Incorporated IrTact I act 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either () () (✓) () directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ( ) {) () (✓) necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating ( ) () () (✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area. Once constructed, the proposed project will have a limited number of employees; hence, it will not create a demand for additional housing as a majority of the employees will likely be hired from within the City or surrounding communities. The impact is considered less-than-significant. • b) The project site contains no existing housing units or structures. No adverse impact expected. c) The project site is vacant land with no structures. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? {) () () {✓) b) Police protection? () () () (✓) C) Schools? +5L 0Md) Parks? {) () Me) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) () (✓) Comments: a) The site, located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue; will be served by Fire Station 174, located less than 2 miles from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard • conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. itam r.Wf, Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 24 Less nan Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially aaMlw"" '��' Significant Bacon signiliCartt No I ffoact Incomorated Invact I ael b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. c) The site is in a developed area currently served by the Cucamonga School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. The project will be required to pay School Fees as prescribed by State law prior to the issuance of building permits. No impacts are anticipated. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located approximately 1 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. According to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan,the City built a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and () () () (✓) regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park is located approximately 1 mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. Itpm C.r)77 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With mar, Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impaet 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in () () (✓) () relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increasein either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of () () (✓) () service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including () () ( ) (✓) either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature () () () (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? () ( ) () (✓) • f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? () ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs () ( ) () (✓) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate a total of 1,243 average daily vehicle trips. The proposed project includes the development of a 122-room hotel. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each room will generate 10.19 average daily trips. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5),continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in the project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume, or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. The project will have right deceleration lanes. on Haven Avenue and 6th Street, which will permit safe vehicle movements into the project without impeding traffic flow. A bus shelter will also be included on 6th Street, which will encourage public transportation. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development Fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. The impact is considered less-than-significant. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each hotel room will have a generation factor of .70 for two-way peak hour trips, resulting in 85 two-way peak hour trips for the ® project. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these Item C.D78 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially With Than Significant Mifigetion Significant No InVact In rated Impact 1 development impact fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted Transportation Development Fee prior to issuance of building permits. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter,and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The impact is considered less-than-significant. c) The site is located approximately 1.25 mile northeasterly of the Ontario Airport, and is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter, and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will not create an inadequate emergency access. The project site includes two points of access, one off Haven Avenue and one off 6th Street. Further, Fire Construction Services is requiring that the project be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system, a listed Central Station Fire Alarm system that will monitor the fire sprinkler system and an automatic/manual fire alarm system prior to occupancy. With the imposition and installation of these fire detection and suppression systems,there will be no impact. Q The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and will, therefore, not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project design includes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks,carpool parking, etc.). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project. a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the () () () (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( ) () () (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm () () () (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the () () () (✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Item C.D79 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( ) () ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted () () ( ) (✓) capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and () () () (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga • and RP-1 located within the City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. c) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The CVWD provides water treatment, storage, and distribution of domestic water to Rancho Cucamonga and portions of the cities of Ontario and Fontana, and a tract in Upland. The current daily water usage in the CVWD service area is approximately 41.7 million gallons per day(mgd). Residential water use amounts to about 60 percent of the total water consumed. Landscaping (public and private) is the next largest consumer of water at 20 percent. Under Senate Bill 610 (SB 610), Water Supply Assessments are required for projects that exceed the following sizes: 1) Residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) shipping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet; 3) commercial office buildings employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet; 4) hotel or motel having more than 500 rooms; 5) industrial, manufacturing, processing plant, or industrial park housing more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet; 6) mixed use project including one or more of the projects specified above; 7) any other project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to or greater than the amount of water required by a 500-dwelling unit project; and 8) any project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system. Under SB 221, a Water Supply Assessment is required when: • 1) A project that is a residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) a project that accounts for an increase of 10 percent or more in the number of existing service connections for a public water system; and 3) applies to development agreements that Include such subdivision. Item C,D80 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 28 Less Than Significant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: ftenaWty fi Than PP g Signiflcettt Mitigation Sigrrificam No Impw incorporated IrM= Imp= The City has determined that the project does not meet one of the requirements; therefore, a Water Supply Assessment is not required. The project is served by the CVWD water system. There is currently a sufficient.water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the CVWD sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste disposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding solid waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga continues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the () () () (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually () ( ) () (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will () () () (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area that is substantially developed with warehouse, office, industrial, and office parks. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR,the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, the hotel project will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. Additionally, no known sensitive habitats are located nearby the project site. Further, based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. Item C.D81 Initial Study for City of.Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially with Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated impact Invact b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. The 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings of Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations for significant adverse environmental effects of build-out in the City and Sphere-of-Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources. Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources; however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels. As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian-friendly and conservation of valuable natural open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. c) Development of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact. Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities • were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels. EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive(check all that apply): (✓) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (✓) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (✓) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (✓) URBEMIS 2007 Air Quality Modeling Analysis, Urban Crossroads (June, 2008) (✓) Water Quality Management Plan, TGA Development and Engineering, Inc. (June,2008) • (✓) Noise Study, Urban Crossroads (June, 2008) Item C.D82 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 30 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am.the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further,.I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects.would occur. Applicant's Signature�� Date: c Z U L"4c. r//L' �3LjQ✓g lq5sCCra• Print Name and Title: Item C.D83 • City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: Development Review DRC2007-00542 This Mitigation Monitoring Program(MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration)for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. • 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management-The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation)that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants'fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when,and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga—Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive • Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Item C.D84 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2007-00542 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring.the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee)with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation.measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Item C,D85 • MITIGATION MONITORING CHOKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: DeveloRment Review DRC2007-00542 Applicant: DKN Hotels c/o Charles Joseph Associates Initial Study Prepared by: Donald Granger, Associate Planner Date: August 20, 2008 Miliga tion Measures No. / — Implementing Action Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for for Monitoring FreCILIOnCy Verification Verification Date/In All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C operating condition so as to reduce operational Review of plans A/C 2/4 emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the PD/BO C Review of plans developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City C 2 denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was r) investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. 0 00 Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A/C performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. 2/4 Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards BO B Review of plans A/C noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 2 All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD_ BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: A/C r • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of plans through seeding and watering. 2/4 • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 1 of 8 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Tinning of • of •• Sanctions for ImplementingAction for • • • Frequency Verif ication • 1Non-Compliance Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 exposed excavated soil during and after the and of work periods. ■ Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering.practices. ■ Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing�may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. • Suspend grading,operations during high winds(i.e., . BO C During A 4 wind speeds.exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. ' ■ Maintain a minimum.24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 fD haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction 3 suitable means. n 00 The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board[RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM1o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans A/C 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A/C 2/4 Construction Grading Plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs BO C Review of plans A 4 requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (i.e., in excess of 10 minutes). 2of8 • All industrial and commercial facilities shall designate PD C Review of plans A/C preferential parking for vanpools. 2/3 All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or PD C Review of plans D more employees shall be required to post both bus and 2/3 Metrolink schedules in conspicuous areas. All industrial and commercial site tenants with 50 or PD C Review of plans D 2/3 more employees shall be required to configure their operating schedules around the Metrolink schedule to the extent reasonably feasible. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 214 required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating,air conditioning,appliances,and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO C/D Review of plans C 2/4 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Cultural Resources �li..'i') -:l'` '.1'..:Y,•.Ir1i3 ;Mrd .A y..T+ !%. gip.: If any prehistoric archaeological resources are 3 encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction 00 activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. • Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. ■ Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report AID 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. 3of8 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Methodof -• Sanctions for Implementing Action for • • • Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report A/D 3/4 documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report,with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide A specific recommendations regarding further mitigation B measures (i.e.,paleontological monitoring)that may n appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, o the program must include, but not be limited to, the 00 following measures: ■ Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report A/D 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being,cleared BO B/C Review of report A/D 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere,until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. ■ Prepare,identify,and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report D 3 documentation-in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). 4of8 I-ESubmitoa summary report to the City of Rancho PD D Cucamnga. Transfer collected specimens with a Review of report D 3 copy to the report to the San Bernardino County Museum. Geology.and Spits ,f' ,�;•.. moi:!'i•�:i, .n+.',fy,;:%. �'r 1..'_ti S+ t��yg .?• ,,j',. `i+. '1'm�: ;s.,' �irr.•:i• -.'v :�,'„•w'p °'6'ra:'= �rti..ti f.: .'-Lz>'�.:r.:' r. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C soil-stabilizingagent y During A 4 9 (approved b SCAQMD and RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions,in accordance construction with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o 4 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil construction off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. - :: Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM,a emissions 4 from the site during such episodes. construction n Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO ap RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction C During A 4 0 areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to construction reduce PM,o omissions. Hydrology and Water Quality. �, R �,�•. Prior to issuance of grading permits,the permit applicant BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C o.y4 shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 5of8 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring FreqUency Verification (Date An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in 80 B/C/D Review of plans A/C the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed y4 project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to;minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off=site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C . 2/4 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. ro During construction., to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 2/4 B cleaningwill be performed prior to storm events and n after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to o prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. �o The:developer.shall implement the BMPs Identified in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C y4 the Water Quality Management'Plan(WQMP),prepared by TGA Development and Engineering, Inc.,to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Landscaping Plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C 214 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a. minimum of two years,shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 6of8 • _ • - • .. . • . ELMUMGMIQ a - Prior to issuance of building permits,the applicant shall BO B/C/D - submit to the City Engineer for approval a WQMP, Review of plans A/C 2/4 including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply 2/4 with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 3 Noise Interior: windows guest rooms,. _;:,,�•�::='•, ;;, : t .� .� ;: _ �..,�tu >r�:-��, ,,:..; ,;v •,.. b All for all g ooms shall be PO/BO B/C Plan A/C 2/3/4 N dual-glazed and shall have a minimum STC rating of 26 Check/During or higher. construction ConstrEli grading shall not take place between the BO C During q hours p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, 4 includiday, or at any time on Sunday ora construction nationa . The con contractor shall equip all construction BO C During qequipmor mobile,with properly operating and4 maintailers,consistent with the manufacturer'sconstruction standar The construction contractor shall place all stationary BO C During A equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from 4 the noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site. construction 7 of 8 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring g of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing The construction contractor shall locate equipment BO C During A 4 staging in areas that will create the greatest distance construction between construction-related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards,then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. M 3 Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/BO C During A 4/7 hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction W including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a W national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a Noise Mitigation Plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the Plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. Key to Checklist Abbreviations { Responsible Person. CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD-Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Brading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designee D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO-Police Captain or designee E-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6:Revoke CUP 7-Citation 8of8 City of Rancho Cucamonga ® ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project Files: SUBTPM19474 and DRC2013-00508 2. Related Files: DRC2007-00542 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19474 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING - A request to create two parcels of land from one existing 2.97 acre parcel located within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue — APN: 0210-081-13. Related file: Development Review DRC2013-00508. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING - A design review of building elevations and detailed Site Plan for the development of a 126-room • hotel and a Site Plan for a 3,000 square foot office pad within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street -APN: 0210-081-13. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map 19474. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: DKN Hotels, c/o Consolidated Consulting 7475 Day Creek Boulevard #103-198 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 S. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park (IP) District, Haven Overlay 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a multi-building office park. To the west, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. Item C.D94 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review SUBTPM19474 and DRC2013-00508 Page 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None. ANALYSIS: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certified an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration on October 22, 2008 in connection with the approval of Development Review DRC2007-00542. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), no subsequent or supplemental Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous Negative Declaration because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects of a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The project site was never developed following the approval of DRC2007-00542. The 2.97-acre site was originally approved for a 122-room hotel with incidental serving of beer and wine, totaling 94,000 square feet. The proposed project is a 126-room hotel with incidental serving of beer and wine totaling 94,669 square feet with a 3,000 square foot office pad. Also included in the project is a tentative parcel map to divide the site into two parcels: a 0.51-acre parcel and a 2.46-acre parcel. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration approved for DRC2007-00542 identified "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" impacts in the areas of Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise, and established Mitigation Measures to address the identified issues. "Less-Than-Significant Impacts" were discussed in the areas of Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Hazards and Waste Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Population and Housing, and TransportatioNTraf ic. For This Initial Study Addendum the applicant has prepared a revised Trip Generation, Distribution and Assignment Analysis dated September 19, 2013, by Arch Beach Consulting and this report did not identify any additional "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" or "Less-Than-Significant Impacts." The applicant also prepared an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis on February 26, 2014, by Vista Environmental. This report provided additional analysis under the Air.quality and Greenhouse Gas section. No new mitigation measures were identified but one mitigation measure was revised. Item C.D95 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga ® Development Review SUBTPM19474 and DRC2013-00508 Page 3 Old Miti4ation Measure: The site will be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particle Matter (PM,o) emission-, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. New Mitigation Measure: The project applicant shall require that the grading contractor comply with all applicable measures listed in SCAQMD Rule 403 to control fugitive dust including the application of water to all exposed surfaces a minimum of three times per day throughout the duration of grading operations. All Mitigation Measures established for the original project along with the amended measure will be addressed during the plan check, construction, and inspection of the project site during development. In consideration of the proposed modification to the original project, there are no identified substantial changes which will require major revisions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred, which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previously certified Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project • is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The proposed project entails modifying the original project by adding four additional hotel rooms and adding 669 square feet of building area, dividing the parcel into two parcels and adding a 3,000 square foot office pad to the original project. The hotel will increase from 94,000 square feet to 94,669 square feet. The original development was thoroughly analyzed for environmental impacts, mitigation measures were established, and those mitigation measures will be implemented during construction to address identified impacts. Although the proposed project involves the expansion of the building and addition of a new office pad, there are no substantial changes that have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that will require major revisions to the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration. All Mitigation Measures established for the original project will be addressed during the plan check, construction, and inspection of the project site during development. The proposed project will be constructed in relatively the same footprint as the original project and the new • office pad will be located directly west of the hotel building across a parking area and drive aisle. The proposed project does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered and the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previously certified Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the original Development Item C,D96 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development.Review SUBTPM19474 and DRC2013-00508 Page 4 Review application. (B) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not tube feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project. All Mitigation Measures established for the original project along with the amended mitigation measure will be addressed during the plan check, construction, and inspection of the project site, during development. The project will not have mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible, and therefore, additional mitigation measures are not required. One mitigation measure has been amended as follows: Old Mitigation Measure: The site will be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particle Matter(PM,o) emission, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. New Mitigation Measure: The project applicant shall require that the grading contractor comply with all applicable measures listed in SCAQMD Rule 403 to control fugitive dust including the application of water to all exposed surfaces a minimum of three times per day throughout the duration of grading operations. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an addendum to an adopted Negative Declaration may be prepared if none of the conditions in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent Negative Declaration have occurred. 'Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of this Development Review application. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Initial Study pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Initial Study, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: Steve Fowler Assistant Planner March 26, 2014 EARLIER ANALYSES Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per'Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within Item C,D97 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review SUBTPM19474 and DRC2013-00508 Page 5 the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis -The following earlier-analyses--were-utilized-in-completingthis-Irtitial Study andare available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: (X) General Plan FPEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified May 19, 2010) (X) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, Certified January 4, 1989) (X) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (X) URBEMIS 2007 Air Quality Modeling Analysis, Urban Crossroads (June, 2008) (X) Water Quality Management Plan, TGA Development and Engineering, Inc. (June, 2008) • (X) Noise Study, Urban Crossroads (June, 2008) (X) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis (February 26, 2014) (X) Revised Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Analysis (September 19, 2013) (X) Initial Study Part II for DRC2007-00542 Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 (October 22, 2008) Item C.D98 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review SUBTPM19474 and DRC2013-00508 Page 6 CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study.. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study Addendum. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signatur Date: Zo Print Name and Title: C R*42-1 L� J 67— i���'o P-rl� Item C.D99 City of Rancho Cucamonga • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II ADDENDUM BACKGROUND 1. Project Files: SUBTPM19474 and DRC2013-00508 2. Related Files: DRC2007-00542 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19474 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING - A request to create two parcels of land from one existing 2.97-acre parcel located within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast corner of 6th Street and Haven Avenue - APN: 0210-081-13. Related file: Development Review DRC2013-00508. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING - A design review of building elevations and detailed Site Plan for the development of a 126-room • hotel and a Site Plan for a 3,000 square foot office pad within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and Haven Avenue - APN: 0210-081-13. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map 19474. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. An addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: DKN Hotels, c/o Consolidated Consulting 7475 Day Creek Boulevard#103-198 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 5. General Plan Designation: Industrial Park 6. Zoning: Industrial Park (IP) District, Haven Overlay 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The 2.97-acre project site is located at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the east is an existing warehouse building, and to the south is a multi-building office park. To the weft, across Haven Avenue, is the Universal Technical Institute, a technical school for-automotive repair. To the north, across 6th Street, are office buildings. The project site is vacant with no existing trees or structures. No demolition or removal of significant vegetation or trees will be required. The parcel is relatively flat, sloping towards the south. • Item C,D100 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-00508 and SUBTPM19474 Page 2 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner (909)477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required: None. Project History In October 2008, the City of Rancho Cucamonga certified an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") in connection with the approval of Development Review DRC2007-00542 pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines. As originally approved, DRC2007-00542 allowed for the development of a 4-story, 122-room hotel building totaling 94,000 square feet on 2.97 acres. The Initial Study and MND approved for DRC2007-00542 concluded the project would have less-than-significant impacts with respect to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality, Hazards and Waste Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Population and Housing, and Transportation/Traffic. It also identified impacts that would be potentially significant unless mitigated in the areas of Air Quality, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise and established mitigation measures that would reduce these potential impacts to a less-than-significant level. The Initial Study Addendum and MND prepared for DRC2007-00542 did not identify any additional "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated" or "Less-Than-Significant Impacts" but did provide additional analysis under Traffic/Circulation. The traffic analysis determined that the project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing, that the project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent streets, and that no impacts are anticipated. The proposed project entails modifying the original project by adding four additional hotel rooms and adding 669 square feet of building area, dividing the parcel into two parcels, and adding a 3,000 square foot office pad to the original project. The hotel will increase from 94,000 square feet to 94,669 square feet. All mitigation measures established for the original project were addressed during the plan check, construction, and inspection of the project site during development. In June 2013, the applicant filed an application for Design Review DRC2013=00508 to change the hotel from a 94,000 square foot 122-room hotel to a 94,669 square foot 126-room hotel with a 3,000 square foot office pad. The applicant also submitted a tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19474 to divide the lot into two parcels. Analysis Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a), the City may prepare an addendum to a previously adopted- mitigated negative declaration if only minor technical changes or additions Item C.13101 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-00508 and SUBTPM19474 Page 3 are necessary or none of the conditions that require the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. Changes to previously approved project for which an EIR _ .-------------ornegative-declai atiorrwasadopted-re negative eddiation if anTof — the following conditions are found to exist: (1) Substantial changes in the project require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration because of the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows: (a) the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are • considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. An addendum to the previously approve MND is appropriate in this case because a minor technical change to the project description in the original MND would be sufficient and there is no evidence that any of the conditions that would require a subsequent EIR or negative declaration are present. First, there is no indication that the minor changes to the project will create new significant environmental effects or cause a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. The project entails the changing the hotel from a 94,000 square foot 122-room hotel to a 94,669 square foot 126-room hotel with a 3,000 square foot office pad and the subdivision of the plot into two parcels. Compared to the originally approved total 94,000 square feet analyzed in the MND, the additional square footage does not amount to a major change and would not create new significant impacts or increase the severity of any impacts previously identified in the MND. Second, there have been no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken. The characteristics of the site and the surrounding properties are similar to those that existing previously, and do not indicate that there will be new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects. Finally, the City has received no new information of substantial importance that was unknown or could not have been known previously that indicates the project will have any significant effects not discussed in the MND, that any previously identified impacts will be substantially more severe-, that any mitigation measure previously found infeasible would' now be-feasibte,-orthat- Item C,D102 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-00508 and SUBTPM19474 Page 4 any mitigation measure considerably different from those analyzed in the previous MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. All mitigation measures establish d foi the odginal project will be addressed during the plan chack, constiaction, and inspection of the project site during development. The new design of the additional 699 square feet to the hotel and the addition of the office pad on the project site will be subject to the same mitigation measures. Other than a revision to one. of Air Quality mitigation measures, no additional or different mitigation measures are required. The revised mitigation reads as follows: Old Mitigation Measure: The site will be treated with water or other soil stabilizing agent (approved by South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particle Matter (PM,o) emission, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. New Mitigation Measure: The project applicant shall require that the grading contractor comply with all applicable measures listed in SCAQMD Rule 403 to control fugitive dust including the application of water to all exposed surfaces a minimum of three times per day throughout the duration of grading operations. In sum, the proposed project entails the redesign of a 4-story hotel whose development was thoroughly analyzed for environmental impacts and for which mitigation measures were established. Although the proposed project involves the increase in the number of rooms, the addition of an office building pad and the division of the parcel into two parcels, there are no substantial changes in the project, its circumstances, or the information on hand that would suggest that the previous environmental review is inadequate. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15164, an Addendum will be added to the previously adopted MND to explain the changes to the project. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of this Development Review application. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (X) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Initial Study pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier Initial Study, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. Signed: Steve Fowle Assistant Planner March 26, 2014 Item C.13103 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga • Development Review DRC2013-00508 and SUBTPM19474 Page 5 EARLIER ANALYSES .—Eartieranalyses may-be used a-- ------ process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicable legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Department offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive: (X) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certified October 17, 2001) (X) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH#88020115, Certified January 4, 1989) (X) Industrial Area Specific Plan EIR (Certified September 19, 1981) (X) URBEMIS 2007 Air Quality Modeling Analysis, Urban Crossroads (June, 2008) 0 (X) Water Quality Management Plan, TGA Development and Engineering, Inc. (June, 2008) (X) Noise Study, Urban Crossroads (June, 2008) (X) Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis (February.26, 2014) (X) Revised Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Analysis (September 19, 2013) (X) Initial Study Part II for DRC2007-00542 Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 (October 22, 2008) Item C.D104 Initial Study Addendum for City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Review DRC2013-00508 and SUBTPM19.474 Page 6 —APPUtCAN"ERTIMAfiIQW—-- ---- I'certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study Addendum. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Signature. Date: ZU — 1 Print Name and Titl RA5s —._. Item C,D105 arch: beach • C O N S U L T I N G -'F- CALM-E-M-@-.R-A_N D ------ TO: Charlie Buquet, Consolidated Consulting FROM: Dennis M. Pascua Principal Transportation Planner DATE: September 19,2013 SUBJECT: REVISED Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Analysis: Tentative Parcel Map SUSTPM19474, DKN Hotels, 10501 6t^Street,City of Rancho Cucamonga The following Technical Memorandum presents the revised trip generation, distribution, and assignment analysis for the proposed DKN Hotels project (proposed project) on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue/61h Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City). This memorandum has been prepared as a response to the City's Project Screencheck letter dated July 17, 2013, from Donald Granger, Senior Planner (copy attached). Under Comment E.1, the Engineering Services Department has requested the submittal of a trip generation and distribution for the • a.m. and p.m. peak hours to determine whether a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) would be required. Per the City, "All intersections where 50 or more two-way peak hour trips are added from the project shall require a traffic study. The traffic study shall analyze existing conditions, opening year with and without the project, and Year 2035 with and without the project." Project Description The proposed project is located on a vacant, rectangular parcel at 10501 6th Street, on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue/Sixth Street. A project on the site was previously approved for the development of a 122-room hotel with an attached 3,250 square foot restaurant that would be open to the general public. The proposed project would develop a 126-room hotel and a 5,000 square foot office building. Per review of the June 18, 2013 site plan by Lee &Sakahara Architects AIA, the hotel would be a four-story, Residence Inn hotel which would be centered on the project site; while a two-story, 5,000 square foot office (with a 3,000 square foot, rectangular footprint) would be developed to the west of the hotel. There would be 145 surface parking spaces on the project site which would be shared between the hotel and office uses. Vehicular access to the project site would be provided via right tum in/out only driveways on 6th Street (two driveways), and one right turn in/out only driveway on Haven Avenue. U-turns are allowed at the adjacent intersections of Haven Avenue/6th Street and Utica Avenue/6th Street to facilitate access to and from the project site. arch beach O N s U L T I N G 55 Camino Del Mar, #125 Del Mar,CA 90 92.014_ (858) 925-61office phone/fax (949) 637-9007 mobile phone www.archbeachconsulting.com Item C,13106 Technical Memorandum-SUBTPM19474,DKN Hotels, 10501 6th Street, Rancho Cucamonga September 19,2013 Page 2 of 3 Trip Generation -- —Tabte It-presents-the-#rip-generatiorr-estir>�af-the-preposed-prejee efhe-previedsly - --=----- approved project. Trip rates for the proposed hotel and offices uses were obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 9th Edition (2012). Table A-Project Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size/Unb Dally In Out Total In Out Total 1 TRIP RATES I All Suites Hotel (311) per occupied room 6.24 0.32 0.16 0.48 0.23 0.32 0.55 Quality Restaurant(931) per TSF 89.95 0.41 0.40 0.81 5.02 2.47 7.49 General Office(710) per TSF 11.03 1 1.37 0.19 1.56 0.25 1.24 1.49 RATIONTRIP GENE PREVIOUS PROJECT All Suites Hotel 122 rooms 761 40 20 60 28 39 67 Quality Restaurant 3.250 TSF 292 1 1 .. 2 16 8 24 TOTAL TRIP GENERATION 1,053 41 21 62 44 47 91 PROPOSED PROJECT All Suites Hotel 126 rooms 786 40 20 60 29 40 69 General Office 5.000 TSF 55 7 1 8 1 6 7 TOTAL TRIP GENERATION 841 47 21 _ 68 30 46 76 DIFFERENCE(PROPOSED-PREVIOUS) -2.12 +6 0 +6 -14 -1 -15 Based on the table, the proposed 'project would generate approximately 841 daily trips, 68 a.m. peak hour trips (47 inbound and 21 outbound), and 76 p.m, peak hour trips (30 inbound and 46 outbound). In comparison to the previously approved project, the proposed project would generate 212 less daily trips, six (6) more a.m. peak hour trips, and 15 less p.m. peak hour trips. The proposed project would generate less daily and peak hour trips, while it would slightly increase a.m. peak hour trips. However, this slight increase in a.m. peak hour trips would likely not result in any significant impacts over the previously approved project. Trip Distribution and Assignment Regional and local trip distribution percentages for the proposed project were based on logical peak hour commute patterns along Haven Avenue and 6th Street. To the south of the project site, Haven Avenue provides direct access to Interstate 10 (1-10) and the LA/Ontario International Airport. In all other directions, Haven Avenue and 6th Street provide access to adjacent office parks and light industrial uses, while further to the north and west of the project site are residential uses. In addition, because of the limited access to Haven Avenue (due raised medians restricting left turns in to, and out of,the site),vehicles exiting the site on 6th Street could also access 1-10 and Foothill Boulevard via Milliken Avenue to the east. As previously noted, vehicular access to the project site would be provided via right tum in/out only driveways on 6th Street (two driveways), and one right turn in/out only driveway on Haven Avenue. U-turns are allowed at the adjacent intersections of Haven Avenue/6th Street and Utica Avenue/6th Street to facilitate access to and from the project site. Figure 1 (attached) illustrates the trip distribution percentages for the proposed project. The trip distribution percentages at the project driveways, and the adjacent intersections of Haven Avenue/6th Street and Utica Avenue/6th Street,were applied to the proposed project's weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hour trip generation estimates to calculate the project trip assignment (i.e., Item C,D107 Technical Memorandum-SUBTPM19474, DKN Hotels, 10501 61h Street, Rancho Cucamonga September 19,2013 Page 3 of 3 turn movement volumes that the project would generate). The resulting weekday a.m. and p.m.peak hour trip assignments are showman Figure 2 (attached) Conclusion Based on the above trip generation, distribution, and assignment analysis above, and as shown in Figure 2, the proposed project would not add 50 or more two-way trips to any intersection, nor would it add 50 or more peak hour trips to a nearby State highway facility (i.e., I-10 and Foothill Boulevard-SR 66). Therefore, a traffic study is not required. Attachments: July 17,2013 Screencheck Letter Figure 1 -Project Trip Distribution Figure 2-Project Driveway Trip Assignment Item C,13108 -- _ _-- ..-Arrow-Routg o Arrow Route 3 10% D m 3% E 8th St 0 0 7th St D � � D E 6th St E 6th St 7 c<p 3% o � D Q. 7% 15% E 4th St E 4th St D n i? 0 Q. D c� Concourse St Inland Empire Blvd 50% E Guasti Rd o LEGEND N ® Project Site A Not To Seab OTrip Distribution �. r' ¢ —--- — --------— — , Figure Project Trip Distribution Item C;D109 i � • I • i IN j A Nql To stole = 2/1 16/12 I � I j < (� < I � Go I m ch c / o I 2/5 / < M i-- 11/23 / 7/5 / � 7/5 E 6th Street 2/2--v,- _ 1.3/28 E 6th Street 14/30-7!!!) 04 5/12 - D \ a < '!-- 2/5 C CD CNI 00 f � LEGEND Project Site I N XX/}X Project Trip Assignment r'k. I Figure 2 y Trip As'ignment Project Driveway I I AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS ANALYSIS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19474 DIN HOTELS PROJECT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PREPARED BY: VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH,CALIFORNIA 92651 GREG TONKOVICH,AICP TELEPHONE(949)510-5355 FACSIMILE(949)715-3629 PROJECT No. 14006 FEBRUARY 26,2014 Item C,D111 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives....................................................................1 1.2 Site Location and Study Area........................................................................................1 1.3 Proposed Project Description.........................................................................................1 2.0 Atmospheric Setting...........................................................................................................4 3.0 Pollutants............................................................................................................................6 3.1 Criteria Pollutants..........................................................................................................6 3.2 Other Pollutants of Concern...........................................................................................7 3.3 Greenhouse Gases..........................................................................................................8 3.4 Global Warming Potential ...........................................................................................11 4.0 Air Quality Management................................................................................................12 4.1 Regulatory Setting.......................................................................................................12 4.2 Monitored Air Quality.................................................................................................23 5.0 Air Quality Standards.....................................................................................................26 5.1 Regional Air Quality....................................................................................................26 5.2 Local Air Quality.........................................................................................................26 5.3 Toxic Air Contaminants...............................................................................................27 5.4 Odor Impacts................................................................................................................27 5.5 Greenhouse Gases........................................................................................................28 6.0 Impact Analysis................................................................................................................29 6.1 CEQA Thresholds of Significance...............................................................................29 6.2 Air Quality Compliance...............................................................................................29 6.3 Air Quality Standard Violation....................................................................................31 6.4 Net Increase in Non-Attainment Pollution..................................................................38 6.5 Sensitive Receptors......................................................................................................39 6.6 Objectionable Odors....................................................................................................39 6.7 Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions...................................................................40 6.8 Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency...............................................................................42 7.0 References.........................................................................................................................44 APPENDIX Appendix A—CaIEEMod Model Daily Printouts Appendix B—CalEEMod Model Annual Printouts • SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page ii Cry qr anc o u n a - _..._...__._.... .__...__. Item C,D112 LIST OF FIGURES _—__ b'igure t= roj Local Studyrem.- ................. Figure 2–Proposed Site Plan.............................................. LIST OF TABLES Table A–Rancho Cucamonga Monthly Climate Data...................................................................5 Table B–Global Warming Potentials,Atmospheric Lifetimes and Abundances of GHGs.........I l Table C–State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards..............................................................13 Table D–South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status.....................................................................14 Table E–Local Area Air Quality Monitoring Summary..................................:...........................24 Table F–SCAQMD Regional Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance...........................26 Table G–SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance for Construction.................27 Table H–Construction-Related Criteria Pollutant Emissions..........:...........................................33 Table I–Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors Prior to Mitigation.................34 Table J–Mitigated Local Construction Emissions at-the Nearest Receptors...............................34 Table K–Operational Air Pollution Emissions............................................................................36 Table L–Local Operational Emissions at the Nearest Receptors..................................:..............37 Table M–Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions....................................................42 SUBTPMI9474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page iii Item C,13113 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Q Air Quality Management Plan Basin South Coast Air Basin CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board CCAA California Clean Air Act CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CO Carbon monoxide CO2 Carbon dioxide CO2e Carbon dioxide equivalent DPM Diesel particulate matter EPA Environmental Protection Agency OF Fahrenheit GHG Greenhouse gas GWP Global warming potential • HFCs Hydrofluorocarbons IPCC International Panel on Climate Change LST Localized Significant Thresholds MSAT Mobile Source Air Toxics MTCO2e Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent MMTCO2e Million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NO, Nitrogen Oxides NO2 Nitrogen dioxide 03 Ozone PM Particle matter PM10 Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter PM2.5 Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter PPM. Parts per million PPB Parts per billion RTIP Regional Transportation Improvement Plan • _.._-_.._. SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page iv Lity o Rancho ucamonga ...___........... ....._-__ Item C,D114 SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SIP State Implementation Plan SOz _....... ._... . --Sulfur Oxides _.. ._.._.... ._.__._. ...- -. . ... .... ........... . ...........__...._.....__......_......... ._........... .. TAC Toxic air contaminants UNFCCC United Nations'Framework Convention on Climate Change VOC Volatile organic compounds SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page v Ory qfRuncho Cara onga Item C,D115 w 1.0 INTRODUCTION LI Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives This Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis has been completed to determine the air quality and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the proposed Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM]9474. DKN Hotels Project(proposed project). The following is provided in this report: • A description of the proposed project; • A description of the atmospheric setting; • A description of the criteria pollutants and greenhouse gases(GHGs); • A description of the air quality regulatory framework; • A description of the air quality and GHG emissions thresholds including the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)significance thresholds; • An analysis of the short-term construction related and long-term operational air quality and GHG emissions impacts;and • An analysis of the conformity of the proposed project with the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)Air Quality Management Pian(AQMP). • An analysis of the conformity of the proposed project with all applicable GHG emissions reduction plans and policies. L2 Site Location and Study Area • The project site is located in the central portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) at 10501 6h Street. The project site is located on the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6 Street consists of an approximately 3.0-acre lot that is currently vacant. The project site is bounded by 6d' Street and office uses to the north, industrial uses to the east, office uses to the south, and Haven Avenue and office uses to the west. The nearest off-site sensitive receptors to the proposed project are office buildings, located as near as 70 feet south of the project site.The project local study area is shown in Figure 1. 1.3 Proposed Project Description The proposed project would consist of the development of a 126-room hotel and a 5,000 square foot office building. The proposed hotel would be a four-story Residence inn hotel with an outdoor sports court, fire pit, barbeque, pool,and spa. The proposed project would provide a total of 143 parking spaces and eight bicycle parking spaces. The proposed project would provide 36,809 square feet of landscaped area and include the planting of a minimum of 140 trees in the parking lot areas. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. SUB TP;tf19474 DK Al Hotels Prr jecr,Air Quality,and Greenhouse Gus Emissions Analvsis Page 1 — try of aitc o- ucamonga Item C,D116 I ; i 1 a { 1 E1'IA f If mp to 00 46 CGU �r $ .o 1 SMI Ilk - - - r••..••s• ww�,wl SWTH STREET s •...aA�eo. aw,u.. - -------------------------------------- =-- -------------------' —�- - ^? '. 1 . alArwrww,s r....r.... ( w.w,•M TSS I.nwr -1^1-------------�w.w. OMW1MTgMtA1Q -.i,1�,,, ..�x.•111 AW ...-.:.,. ... A A A� .,b, oo11t Mn� mm ,ow { { 1 W ' : •• ..ws... r131"Sr01..Gli r . r MQ,AIARII {ecMAPWn{tor Z 1 � ..�,.,•,., - It KIT .. j .. , .. - %`� wr. •I." ^ alroorWm• wlwlo Irw 1 a • na1a r+«oTn e. 1 • LOAM � T I a f2 Lae ii, bm C - 7 K. VKSMMAP r. r \ \ j �. AADCMSOfgE w,.wAr ,.sw - AM.Iwu _. ,., . � �`. OgIr0A0"6drMdlR,'t «,..'... ...,- -.w1Arw ..., «••..,. MO,AMII) rl..o - PAIIpNG INFOIIw►TgN rrwa—Ts——Ana Ira IrD — -- Acwme MgMATc" STTE INFORMATION S �. . 1111 .• 'rarp -- - gip— 1 -- — —-- - - , .AMONG MOTEL e1 RTS I OI�T In �j�0 S"TOTS ZE(.s¢E Ife ke 9► !+'I TOTALW E On ACCE.S34"SPACES AAL') ,a1 ro s 1!µaa.00r.w.rt AI¢/1IMOTEU n 17r 1. a,MS, Mtaa.00T.IIS,TARp Ao�I SPACES r no sE ,n» n •, ! _Tw�x��BOE ]1{"a µDue SM COWRAeE 14 a p*EI ew j •wlNw� , +N��•••• (MOTEL, 71111Y wx SNICAa,1E1W Torr ulC�Ir ' „m br (w+Lp, OF STO"s . j TOTAL OW61AOE 1(LOE SREI a• {uaO.lc tETSvni AbMO •'-' ""-- �t -.. TOTAL ACCE SWF Santis 'e la LANDSCAPE COVERAa IW,EL%I / IMOSg1.E COVERIIO!111!'fAL W. —.— – � "`. -•.t q ': SR:TCLE ST+ACES S 1 Ml11SEl1a PAI11OMOlDT Iq¢S -- M TIIEES TEAR 11rT '— ----- , ' SUQ m .11ortTLOCATO„ • , SOURCE.Lead S Wa?,r Ar"pc(., VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL Figure 2 - ---- ----- ----�- Proposed Site Plan 7 2.0 ATMOSPHERIC SETTING The project site is located within the western portion of San Bernardino County, which is part of the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) that includes the non-desert portions of Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties and all of all of Orange County. The Basin is located on a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills to the east. Regionally, the Basin is bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the southwest and high mountains to the east forming the inland perimeter. The climate of western San Bernardino County, technically called an interior valley subclimate of the Southern California's Mediterranean-type climate, is characterized by hot dry summers, mild moist winters with infrequent rainfall, moderate afternoon breezes, and generally fair weather. Occasional periods of strong Santa Ana winds and winter storms interrupt the otherwise mild weather pattern. The clouds and fog that form along the area's coastline rarely extend as far inland as western San Bernardino County. When morning clouds and fog form, they typically bran off quickly after sunrise. The most important weather pattern from an air quality perspective is associated with the warm season airflow across the populated areas of the Los Angeles Basin. This airflow brings polluted air into western San Bernardino County late in the afternoon. This transport pattern creates unhealthful air quality that may extend to the project site particularly during the summer months. Winds are an important parameter in characterizing the air quality environment of a project site because they both determine the regional pattern of air pollution transport and control the rate of dispersion near a source. Daytime winds in western San Bernardino County are usually light breezes from off the coast as air moves regionally onshore from the cool Pacific Ocean to the warm Mojave Desert interior of Southern California. These winds allow for good local mixing, but as discussed above, these coastal winds cant' significant amounts of industrial and automobile air pollutants from the densely urbanized western portion of the Basin into the interior valleys which become trapped by the mountains that border the eastern edge of the Basin. In the summer, strong temperature inversions may occur that limit the vertical depth through which air pollution can be dispersed. Air pollutants concentrate because they cannot rise through the inversion layer and disperse. These inversions are more common and persistent during the summer months. Over time, sunlight produces photochemical reactions within this inversion layer that creates ozone, a particularly harmful air pollutant. Occasionally, strong thermal convections occur which allows the air pollutants to rise high enough to pass over the mountains and ultimately dilute the smog cloud. In the winter, light nocturnal winds result mainly from thedrainage of cool air off of the mountains toward the valley floor while the air aloft over the valley remains warm. This forms a type of inversion known as a radiation inversion. Such winds are characterized by stagnation and poor local mixing and trap pollutants such as automobile exhaust near their source. While these inversions may lead to air pollution "hot spots" in heavily developed coastal areas of the basin, there is not enough traffic in inland valleys to cause any winter air pollution problems. Despite light wind conditions,especially at night and in the early morning,winter is generally a period of good air quality in the project vicinity. The temperature and precipitation levels for the project site are shown below in Table A. Table A shows that August is typically the warmest month and December is typically the coolest month. Rainfall in the project area varies considerably in both time and space. Almost all the annual rainfall comes from the fringes of mid-latitude storms from tate November to early April, with summers being almost completely dry. SUBTPIV19474 DKIV Hotels Project, Air Quality and Greenhouse Cas Emissions Analysis _ Page 4 Itam r x)110 ® Table A—Rancho Cucamonga Monthly Climate Data Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Avg.Maxr_. . --.._... .. _.. ---- Temperature 68 - ._ - 70 71- -� 7G- 80--- 88 95 95-- 91 - $3 74- 69 Avg.Min. 45 47 47 49 53 57 62 63 62 56 49 44 Temperature Avg.Total Precipitation(in.) 3.50 3.55 3.49 0.63 0.19 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.26 0.27 1.26 1.63 Source:_h_o://w%kw.weather.com/weather/wxclimatoloey/monthly/g VhNSCA091 l • SUBTPM19474 _...__._. DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page S t o anc o Cucamonga _- Item C,D120 30 POLLUTANTS Pollutants are generally classified as either criteria pollutants or non-criteria pollutants. Federal ambient air quality standards have been established for criteria poIFlutants,-whereas no--am bient-standa-rds'have been established for non-criteria pollutants. For some criteria pollutants,separate standards have been set for different periods. Most standards have been set to protect public health. For some pollutants, standards have been based on other values (such as protection of crops, protection of materials, or avoidance of nuisance conditions). A summary of federal and state ambient air quality standards is provided in the Regulatory Framework section. 3.1 Criteria Pollutants The criteria pollutants consist of: ozone, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, sulfur oxides, lead, and particulate matter. These pollutants can harm your health and the environment, and cause property damage. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calls these pollutants "criteria" air pollutants because it regulates them by developing human health-based and/or environmentally-based criteria for setting permissible levels. The following provides descriptions of each of the criteria pollutants. Nitrogen Oxides Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) is the generic tern for a group of highly reactive gases which contain nitrogen and oxygen. While most NOx are colorless and odorless, concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NOD can often be seen as a reddish-brown layer over many urban areas. NOx form when fuel is burned at high temperatures, as in a combustion process. The primary manmade sources of NO,, are motor vehicles, electric utilities,and other industrial,commercial,and residential sources that burn fuel. NOx reacts with other pollutants to form,ground-level ozone, nitrate particles, acid aerosols,as well as NO2, which cause respiratory problems. NO,, and the pollutants formed from NO. can be transported over long distances, following the patterns of prevailing winds. Therefore controlling NOx is often most effective if done from a regional perspective,rather than focusing on the nearest sources. Ozone Ozone is not usually emitted directly into the air but in the vicinity of ground-level is created by a chemical reaction between NOx and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the presence of sunlight. Motor vehicle exhaust, industrial emissions, gasoline vapors,chemical solvents as well as natural sources emit NOx and VOC that help form ozone. Ground-level ozone is the primary constituent of smog. Sunlight and hot weather cause ground-level ozone to form with the greatest concentrations usually occurring downwind from urban areas. Ozone is subsequently considered a regional pollutant. Ground- level ozone is a respiratory irritant and an oxidant that increases susceptibility to respiratory infections and can cause substantial damage to vegetation and other materials. Because NOx and VOC are ozone precursors, the health effects associated with ozone are also indirect health effects associated with significant levels of NOx and VOC emissions. Carbon Monoxide Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless gas that is formed when carbon in fuel is not burned completely. It is a component of motor vehicle exhaust, which contributes approximately 56 percent of all CO emissions nationwide. In cities, 85 to 95 percent of all CO emissions may come from motor vehicle exhaust. Other sources of CO emissions include industrial processes (such as metals processing and chemical manufacturing), residential wood burning, and natural sources such as forest fires. Woodstoves,gas stoves,cigarette smoke,and unvented gas and kerosene space heaters are indoor sources of CO. The highest levels of CO in the outside air typically occur during the colder months of the year when inversion conditions are more frequent. The air pollution becomes trapped near the ground beneath SUBTPM19474 DKNHotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 6 - -— Cjty o anc o ucamonga Item C,D121 ® a layer of warm air. CO is described as having only a local influence because it dissipates quickly. Since CO concentrations are strongly associated with motor vehicle emissions, high CO concentrations generally occur in the immediate vicinity of roadways with high traffic volumes and traffic congestion, active-parking''lots, and-in,automobile-tunneIT­areas 'adjacent to heavily traveled and--congested intersections are particularly susceptible to high CO concentrations. CO is a public health concern because it combines readily with hemoglobin and thus reduces the amount of oxygen transported in the bloodstream. The health threat from lower levels of CO is most serious for those who suffer from heart disease such as angina, clogged arteries, or congestive heart failure. For a person with heart disease, a single exposure to CO at low levels may cause chest pain and reduce that person's ability to exercise; repeated exposures may contribute to other cardiovascular effects. High levels of CO can affect even healthy people. People who breathe high levels of CO can develop vision problems, reduced ability to work or learn, reduced manual dexterity, and difficulty performing complex tasks. At extremely high levels,CO is poisonous and can cause death. Sulfur Oxides Sulfur Oxide(SOx)gases are formed when fuel containing sulfur, such as coal and oil is burned, as well as from the refining of gasoline. SOx dissolves easily in water vapor to form acid and interacts with other gases and particles in the air to form sulfates and other products that can be harmful to people and the environment. Lead Lead is a metal found naturally in the environment as well as manufactured products. The major sources of lead emissions have historically been motor vehicles and industrial sources. Due to the phase out of ® leaded gasoline, metal processing is now the primary source of lead emissions to the air. High levels of lead in the air are typically only found near lead smelters, waste incinerators, utilities, and lead-acid battery manufacturers. Exposure of fetuses, infants and children to low levels of Pb can adversely affect the development and function of the central nervous system, leading to learning disorders, distractibility, inability to follow simple commands, and lower intelligence quotient. In adults, increased lead levels are associated with increased blood pressure. Particulate Matter Particle matter(PM)is the term for a mixture of solid particles and liquid droplets found in the air.PM is made up of a number of components including acids (such as nitrates and sulfates), organic chemicals, metals, and soil or dust particles. The size of particles is directly linked to their potential for causing health problems. Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM l0) are the particles that generally pass through the throat and nose and enter the lungs. Once inhaled, these particles can affect the heart and lungs and cause serious health effects. Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) have been designated as a subset of PM10 due to their increased negative health impacts and its ability to remain suspended in the air longer and travel further. 3.2 Other Pollutants of Concern Toxic Air Contaminants In addition to the above-listed criteria pollutants, toxic air contaminants (IACs) are another group of pollutants of concern. Sources of TACs include industrial processes such as petroleum refining and chrome plating operations, commercial operations such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners, and motor vehicle exhaust. Cars and trucks release at least 40 different toxic air contaminants. The most important of these TACs, in terms of health risk, are diesel particulates, benzene, formaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene, and • SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 7 i o Rancho Cucamonga — — Item C,D122 acetaldehyde. Public exposure to IACs can result from emissions from normal operations as well as from accidental releases. Health effects of TACs include cancer, birth defects,neurological damage, and death. TACs are less pervasive in the urban atmosphere than criteria air pollutants, however they are linked to short-tern (acute) or long-term (chronic or carcinogenic) adverse human health effects. There are hundreds of different types of TACs with varying degrees of toxicity. Sources of TACs include industrial processes,commercial operations(e.g.,gasoline stations and dry cleaners),and motor vehicle exhaust. According to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2009 Edition, the majority of the estimated health risk from TACs can be attributed to relatively few compounds, the most important of which is diesel particulate matter(DPM). DPM is a subset of PM2.5 because the size of diesel particles are typically 2.5 microns and smaller. The identification of DPM as a TAC in 1998 led the California Air Resources Board(CARB)to adopt the Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-fueled Engines and Vehicles in September 2000. The plan's goals are a 75-percent reduction in DPM by 2010 and an 85-percent reduction by 2020 from the 2000 baseline. Diesel engines emit a complex mixture of air pollutants, composed of gaseous and solid material. The visible emissions in diesel exhaust are known as particulate matter or PM, which includes carbon particles or"soot." Diesel exhaust also contains a variety of harmful gases and over 40 other cancer-causing substances. California's identification of DPM as a toxic air contaminant was based on its potential to cause cancer, premature deaths, and other health problems. Exposure to DPM is a health hazard, particularly to children whose lungs are still developing and the elderly who may have other serious health problems. Overall, diesel engine emissions are responsible for the majority of California's potential airborne cancer risk from combustion sources. Asbestos Asbestos is listed as a TAC by CARB and as a Hazardous Air Pollutant by the EPA. Asbestos occurs naturally in mineral formations and crushing or breaking these rocks, through construction or other means, can release asbestiform fibers into the air. Asbestos emissions can result from the sale or use of asbestos-containing materials,road surfacing with such materials, grading activities, and surface mining. The risk of disease is dependent upon the intensity and duration of exposure. When inhaled, asbestos fibers may remain in the lungs and with time may be linked to such diseases as asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma. The nearest likely locations of naturally occurring asbestos, as identified in the General Location Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California,prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology,is located in Santa Barbara County. The nearest historic asbestos mine to the project site,as identified in the Reported Historic Asbestos Mines, Historic Asbestos Prospects, and Other Natural Occurrences'of Asbestos in California, prepared by U.S. Geological Survey, is located at Asbestos Mountain, which is approximately 60 miles southeast of the project site in the San Jacinto Mountains. Due to the distance to the nearest natural occurrences of asbestos, the project site is not likely to contain asbestos. 3.3 Greenhouse Gases Constituent gases of the Earth's atmosphere,called atmospheric greenhouse gases(GHGs),play a critical role in the Earth's radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation from the Earth's surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (03), water vapor, nitrous oxide (N2O), and chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth's natural climate,known as SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 8 —C1'ry-bf Ran—ch-6-Cu--amonga --- Item C.131 23 ® global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities, transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State's greenhouse gas emissions; followed by-electricity-generation.- Emissions-of CO-Z and NZO are byproducts-of fossit fuel- combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off-gassing associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. The following provides a description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential. Water Vapor Water vapor is the most abundant, important, and variable GHG in the atmosphere. Water vapor is not considered a pollutant; in the atmosphere it maintains a climate necessary for life. Changes in its concentration are primarily considered a result of climate feedbacks related to the warming of the atmosphere rather than a direct result of industrialization. The feedback loop in which water is involved is critically important to projecting future climate change. As the temperature of the atmosphere rises, more water is evaporated from ground storage (rivers, oceans, reservoirs, soil). Because the air is warner, the relative humidity can be higher(in essence, the air is able to "hold" more water when it is warmer), leading to more water vapor in the atmosphere. As a GHG, the higher concentration of water vapor is then able to absorb more thermal indirect energy radiated from the Earth, thus further warming the atmosphere. The warmer atmosphere can then hold more water vapor and so on and so on. This is referred to as a"positive feedback loop." The extent to which this positive feedback loop will continue is unknown as there is also dynamics that put the positive feedback loop in check. As an example, when water vapor increases in the atmosphere, more of it will eventually also condense into clouds, which are more able to reflect incoming solar radiation (thus allowing less energy to reach the Earth's surface and • heat it up). Carbon Dioxide The natural production and absorption of CO2 is achieved through the terrestrial biosphere and the ocean. However, humankind has altered the natural carbon cycle by burning coal, oil, natural gas, and wood. Since the industrial revolution began in the mid 1700s, each of these activities has increased in scale and distribution. CO2 was the first GHG demonstrated to be increasing in atmospheric concentration with the first conclusive measurements being made in the last half of the 20'b century. Prior to the industrial revolution, concentrations were fairly stable at 280 parts per million (ppm). The International Panel on Climate Change(IPCC)indicates that concentrations were 379 ppm in 2005,an increase of more than 30 percent. Left unchecked, the IPCC projects that concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is projected to increase to a minimum of 540 ppm by 2100 as a direct result of anthropogenic sources. This could result in an average global temperature rise of at least two degrees Celsius or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Methane CH4 is an extremely effective absorber of radiation, although its atmospheric concentration is less than that of CO2. Its lifetime in the atmosphere is brief(10 to 12 years), compared to some other GHGs(such as CO2, N2O, and Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)). CH4 has both natural and anthropogenic sources. It is released as part of the biological processes in low oxygen environments, such as in swamplands or in rice production (at the roots of the plants). Over the last 50 years, human activities such as growing rice, raising cattle, using natural gas,and mining coal have added to the atmospheric concentration of methane. Other anthropocentric sources include fossil-fuel combustion and biomass burning. • SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 9 --- ---Cr<y ofli'ano Cu chcamonga_. ---- ------ -- ---------------------------------.... . Item C_D124 Nitrous Oxide Concentrations of N20 also began to rise at the beginning of the industrial revolution. In 1998,the global concentration..of this GHG was documented at 314 parts per billion(ppb),.. N2Q is produced by microbial processes in soil and water, including those reactions which occur in fertilizer containing nitrogen. In addition to agricultural sources, some industrial processes (fossil fuel-fired power plants, nylon production, nitric acid production, and vehicle emissions)also contribute to its atmospheric load. N20 is also commonly used as an aerosol spray propellant(i.e., in whipped cream bottles, in potato chip bags to keep chips fresh,and in rocket engines and race cars). Chlorofluorocarbons CFCs are gases formed synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in methane or ethane (C2H6) with chlorine and/or fluorine atoms. CFCs are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble,and chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of air at the Earth's surface). CFCs have no natural source, but were first synthesized in 1928. They were used for refrigerants, aerosol propellants,and cleaning solvents. Due to the discovery that they are able to destroy stratospheric ozone,a global effort to halt their production was undertaken and in 1989 the European Community agreed to ban CFCs by 2000 and subsequent treaties banned CFCs worldwide by 2010. This effort was extremely successful,and the levels of the major CFCs are now remaining level or declining. However, their long atmospheric lifetimes mean that some of the CFCs will remain in the atmosphere for over 100 years. Hydrofluorocarbons HFCs are synthetic man-made chemicals that are used as a substitute for CFCs. Out of all the GHGs, they are one of three groups with the highest global warming potential. The HFCs with the largest measured atmospheric abundances are(in order),HFC-23 (CHF3), HFC-.134a(CF3CH2F), and HFC-152a (CH3CHF2). Prior to 1990,the only significant emissions were HFC-23. HFC-134a use is increasing due to its use as a refrigerant. Concentrations of HFC-23 and HFC-134a in the atmosphere are now about 10 parts per trillion (ppt) each. Concentrations of HFC-152a are about 1 ppt. HFCs are manmade for applications such as automobile air conditioners and refrigerants. Perfluorocarbon Perfluorocarbon (PFCs) have stable molecular structures and do not break down through the chemical processes in the lower atmosphere. High-energy ultraviolet rays about 60 kilometers above Earth's surface are able to destroy the compounds. Because of this, PFCs have very long lifetimes, between 10,000 and 50,000 years. Two common PFCs are tetrafluoromethane(CF4)and hexafluoroethane(C2F6)- Concentrations of CF4 in the atmosphere are over 70 ppt. The two main sources of PFCs are primary aluminum production and semiconductor manufacturing. Sulfur Hexafluoride Sulfur Hexafluoride (SF6) is an inorganic, odorless, colorless, nontoxic, nonflammable gas. SF6 has the highest global warning potential of any gas evaluated; 23,900 times that of CO2. Concentrations in the 1990s were about 4 ppt. Sulfur hexafluoride is used for insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, in the magnesium industry, in semiconductor manufacturing, and as a tracer gas for leak detection. Aerosols Aerosols are particles emitted into the air through burning biomass (plant material) and fossil fuels. Aerosols can warm the atmosphere by absorbing and emitting heat and can cool the atmosphere by reflecting light. Cloud formation can also be affected by aerosols. Sulfate aerosols are emitted when fuel containing sulfur is burned. Black carbon (or soot) is emitted during biomass burning due to the SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D125 incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Particulate matter regulation has been lowering aerosol g g concentrations in the United States;however,global concentrations are likely increasing. 3.4 GIdbat WdrMing Foteh&l— - GHGs have varying global warming potential (GWP). The GWP is the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap heat in the atmosphere; it is the cumulative radiative forcing effects of a gas over a specified time horizon resulting from the emission of a unit mass of gas relative to the reference gas,CO2. The GHGs listed by the IPCC and the CEQA Guidelines are discussed in this section in order of abundance in the atmosphere. Water vapor, the most abundant GHG, is not included in this list because its natural concentrations and fluctuations far outweigh its anthropogenic (human-made) sources. To simplify reporting and analysis, GHGs are commonly defined in terms of their GWP. The IPCCC defines the GWP of various GHG emissions on a normalized scale that recasts all GHG emissions in terms of CO2e. The GWP of CO2 is by definition, 1. The GWP values used in this analysis are based on the IPCC Second Assessment Report (SAR) and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) reporting guidelines, and are detailed in Table B. The SAR GWPs are used in CARB's California inventory and AB32 Scoping Plan estimates. Table B—Global Warming Potentials,Atmospheric Lifetimes and Abundances of GHGs Atmospheric Lifetime Global Warming Potential Atmospheric Gas (years)' (100 Year Horizouf Abundance Carbon Dioxide(CO2) 50-200 l 379 ppm Methane(CH4) 9-15 21 1,774 ppb Nitrous Oxide(N20) 120 310 319 ppb HFC-23 264 11,700 18 ppt HFC-134a 14.6 1,300 35 ppt HFC-152a 1.5 140 3.9 ppt PFC:Tetrafluoromethane(CF4) 50,000 6,500 74 ppt PFC: Hexafluoroethane(C2F6) 10,000 9,200 2.9 ppt Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) 3,200 23,900 5.6 ppt Notes. 'Defined as the half-life of the gas. Z Compared to the same quantity of CO,emissions. Definitions:ppm=parts per million;ppb=parts per billion;ppt=parts per trillion Source:IPCC,2007. • SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 11 --City of Ra►rc,60 I�u camonga ItPM r-1)1.76 4.0 AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT 4.1 RegulatorySetting The air quality at the project site is addressed through the efforts of various international, federal, state, regional,and local government agencies. These agencies work jointly,as well as individually,to improve air quality through legislation,regulations,planning,policy-making,education,and a variety of programs. The agencies responsible for improving the air quality are discussed below. International In 1988, the United Nations established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to, evaluate the impacts of global climate change and to develop strategies that nations could implement to curtail global climate change. In 1992, the United States joined other countries around the world in signing the United Nations' Framework Convention on Climate Change(UNFCCC)agreement with the goal of controlling GHG emissions. The parties of the UNFCCC adopted the Kyoto Protocol, which set binding GHG reduction targets for 37 industrialized countries, the objective of reducing their collective GHG emissions by five percent below 1990 levels by 2012. The Kyoto Protocol has been ratified by 182 countries,but has not been ratified by the United States. It should be noted that Japan and Canada opted out of the Kyoto Protocol and the remaining developed countries that ratified the Kyoto Protocol have not met their Kyoto targets. The Kyoto Protocol expired in 2012 and the amendment for the second commitment period from 2013 to 2020 has not yet entered into legal force. Additionally,the Montreal Protocol was originally signed in 1987 and substantially amended in 1990 and 1992. The Montreal Protocol stipulates that the production and consumption of compounds that deplete ozone in the stratosphere--CFCs, halon, carbon tetrachloride, and methyl chloroform—were to be phased out,with the first three by the year 2000 and methyl chloroform by 2005. Federal-United States Environmental Protection Agency The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for setting and enforcing the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for atmospheric pollutants. It regulates emission sources that are under the exclusive authority of the federal government, such as aircraft, ships, and certain locomotives. NAAQS pollutants were identified using medical evidence and are shown below in Table C. As part of its enforcement responsibilities,the EPA requires each state with federal nonattainment areas to prepare and submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) that demonstrates the means to attain the national standards. The SIP must integrate federal,state,and local components and regulations to identify specific measures to induce pollution, using a combination of performance standards and market-based programs within the timeframe identified in the SIP. On December 14,2012,the EPA revised the prima7 annual PM2.5 NAAQS from 15 µg/m3 to 12 µg/m3 and retained the 24 hour PM2.5 standard at 35 pghn in.orderto provide increased protection for children, older adults, persons with pre-existing heart and lung disease and other at risk population. The State is required to submit the updated area designations to the EPA by December 13,2013. SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 12 ---- -- elt�Of�ffnC uCamdnga i+am r nt» • Table C—State and Federal Criteria Pollutant Standards Air Concentration/Averaging Time ...Pollutant_. . California—. ...Federal Primary.- ---..._.._.. Standards Standards Most Relevant Effects (a)Pulmonary function decrements and localized lung edema in humans and animals; (b) Risk to public health implied by 0.09 ppm/1-hour alterations in pulmonary morphology and host defense in Ozone(03) 0.075 ppm,/8-hour animals; (c)Increased mortality risk;(d)Risk to public health 0.07 ppm/8-hour implied by altered connective tissue metabolism and altered pulmonary morphology in animals after long-term exposures and pulmonary function decrements in chronically exposed humans;(e)Vegetation damage;and(f)Property damage. (a) Aggravation of angina pectoris and other aspects of Carbon 20.0 ppm/1-hour 35.0 ppm/1-hour coronary heart disease; (b) Decreased exercise tolerance in Monoxide persons with peripheral vascular disease and lung disease;(c) (CO) 9.0 ppm/8-hour 9.0 ppm/8-hour Impairment of central nervous system functions; and (d) Possible increased risk to fetuses. (a) Potential to aggravate chronic respiratory disease and Nitrogen 0.18 ppm/1-hour 100 ppb/1-hour respiratory symptoms in sensitive groups; (b) Risk to public Dioxide 0.030 ppm annual 0.053 ppm/annual health implied by pulmonary and extra-pulmonary / (NO2) biochemical and cellular changes and pulmonary structural changes;and(c)Contribution to atmospheric discoloration. Sulfur 0.25 ppm/1-hour (a) Bronchoconstriction accompanied by symptoms which 75 ppb/1-hour may include wheezing, shortness of breath and chest Dioxide (SO2) 0.04 ppm/24-hour 0.14ppm/annual tightness, during exercise or physical activity in persons with asthma. • Suspended Particulate 50µg1/3;/24-hour 150µg/m3/24-hour Matter 20µg/m /annual (a) Exacerbation of symptoms in sensitive patients with (PMio) respiratory or cardiovascular disease; (b) Declines in Suspended pulmonary function growth in children;and(c)Increased risk Particulate 12µg/m 3 35µg//3/24-hour of premature death from heart or lung diseases in elderly. /annual n Matter 12µg/m /annual (PM2.5) (a) Decrease in ventilatory function; (b) Aggravation of Sulfates 25µg//3/24-hour No Federal asthmatic symptoms: (c ) Aggravation of cardio-pulmonary Standards disease; (d)Vegetation damage;(e)Degradation of visibility; and(f)Property damage. Lead 1.5 gg/m3/30-day 0.15µg/m3/3- (a) Learning disabilities; and (b) Impairment of blood month rolling formation and nerve conduction. Extinction coefficient of 0.23 Visibility Per kilometer- Reducing visibility often miles No Federal Visibility impairment on days when relative humidity is less Particles or more due to Standards than 70 percent. particles when relative humidity is less than 70 percent. Source:h=://www,arb.ca gov/research/aags/aa s2 odf. As indicated below in Table D,the Basin has been designated by EPA for the national standards as a non- attainment area for ozone (03) and suspended particulates (PM 10 and PM2.5)and partial non-attainment for lead. Currently,the Basin is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for carbon monoxide • (CO),sulfur dioxide(SO2),and nitrogen dioxide(NO2). SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 13 Item C,D128 Table D—South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status Pollutant Averaging Time National Standards California Standards Attainment Date' 1979 1-Hour Nonattainment(Extreme) 1-Hour Ozone(03)3 (0.12 ppm) 11/15/2010(not attained) 1997 8-How Nonattainment(Extreme) Nonattainment 8-Hour Ozone(03)4 (0.08 ppm) 6/15/2024 2008 8-Hour Nonattainment(Extreme) 8-Hour Ozone(03) (0.075 ppm) 12/31/2032 Carbon Monoxide(CO) 1-Hour(35 ppm) Attainment(Maintenance) Maintenance 8=Hour(9 ppm) 6/11/2007(attained) 1-Hour Unclassifiable/Attainment s (100 ppb) Attained Nonattainment Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2) Annual Attainment(Maintenance) (0.053 ppm) . 9/22/1998 1-Hour(75 ppb) Designation Pending/Pending Sulfur Dioxide(SO2r 24-Hour(0.14 ppm) Unclassifiable/Attainment Attainment Annual(0.03 ppm) 3/19/1979..(attained) PM10 24-Hour Nonattainment(Serious) Nonattainment (150µg/m3) 12/31/2006(redesignation submitted)? 24-Hour Nonattainment PM2.5 (35 gg/nl) 12/14/2014 Nonattainment Annual Nonattainment (15.0 Ag/m) 4/5/2015 Lead(Pb) 3-Months Rolling Nonattainment(Partial)8 Nonattainment (0.15µg/m) 12/31/2015 _ T Obtained from Draft 2012 AQMP,SCAQMD,2012.A design value below the NAAQS for data through the full year or smog season prior to the attainment date is typically required for attainment demonstration. 'Obtained from htm•//www arb ca ovg /desiptadm/adm htm. 3 1-hour 03 standard(0.12 ppm)was revoked,effective June 15,.2005;however,the Basin has not attained this standard based on 2008-2010 data has some continuing obligations under the former standard. 4 1997 8-hour 03 standard(0.08 ppm)was reduced(0.075 ppm),effective May 27,2008;the 1997 03 standard and most related implementation rules remain in place until the 1997 standard is revoked by U.S.EPA. 'New NOi 1-hour standard,effective August 2,2010;attainment designations January 20,2012;annual NO2 standard retained. e The 1971 annual and 24-hour SO2 standards were revoked,effective August 23,2010;however,these 1971 standards will remain in effect until one year after U.S.EPA promulgates area designations for the 2010 SO2 1-hour standard. Area designations are expected in 2012,with Basin designated Unclassifiable/Attainment Annual PM 10 standard was revoked,effective December 18,2006;redesignation request to Attainment of the 24-hour PM 10 standard is pending with U.S.EPA Partial Nonattainment designation—Los Angeles County portion of Basin only. In 2011, the Basin exceeded federal standards for either ozone or PM2.5 at one or more locations on a total of 124 days, based on the current federal standards for 8-how ozone and 24-hour PM2.5. Despite substantial improvements in air quality over the past few decades, some air monitoring stations in the Basin still exceed the NAAQS for ozone more frequently than any other stations in the U.S. In 2011, three of the top five stations that exceeded the 8-hour ozone NAAQS were located in the Basin(Central San Bernardino Mountains,East San Bernardino Valley,and Metropolitan Riverside County). PM2.5 in the Basin has improved significantly in recent years, with 2010 and 2011 being the cleanest years on record. In 2011, only one station in the Basin (Metropolitan Riverside County at Mira Loma) exceeded the annual PM2.5 NAAQS and the 98`h percentile form of the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS,as well SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 14 Ci}f-+of Rancho Cucaiiionga Itpm C-01 2q • as the 3-year design values for these standards. Basin-wide, the federal PM2.5 24-hour standard level was exceeded in 2011 on 17 sampling days. The Basin is-currently in--attainment-for the federal, standards for SO2i- CO,- and NOZ: --While-the concentration level of the new 1-hour NO2 federal standard (100 ppb) was exceeded in the Basin at two stations(Central Los Angeles and Long Beach)on the same day in 2011, the NAAQS NO2 design value has not been exceeded. Therefore,the Basin remains in attainment of the NO2 NAAQS. The EPA designated the Los Angeles County portion of the Basin as nonattainment for the recently revised(2008)federal lead standard(0.15 pg/m3, rolling 3-month average), due to the addition of source- specific monitoring under the new federal regulation. This designation was based on two source-specific monitors in Vernon and the City of Industry exceeding the new standard in the 2007-2009 period of data used. For the most recent 2009-2011 data period, only one of these stations (Vernon)still exceeded the lead standard. In Massachusetts v.Environmental Protection Agency(Docket No.05-1120),argued November 29,2006 and decided April 2, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court held that not only did the EPA have authority to regulate greenhouse gases, but the EPA's reasons for not regulating this area did not fit the statutory requirements. As such, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the EPA should be required to regulate CO2 and other greenhouse gases as pollutants under the federal Clean Air Act(CAA). In response to the FY2008 Consolidations Appropriations Act (H.R. 2764; Public Law 110-161), EPA proposed a rule on March 10, 2009 that requires mandatory reporting of GHG emissions from large sources in the United States. On September 22, 2009,the Final Mandatory Reporting of GHG Rule was • signed and published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2009. The rule became effective on December 29, 2009. This rule requires suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial GHGs, manufacturers of vehicles and engines, and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of GHG emissions to submit annual reports to EPA. On December 7, 2009, the EPA Administrator signed two distinct findings under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. One is an endangerment finding that finds concentrations of the six GHGs in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. The other is a cause or contribute finding, that finds emissions from new motor vehicles and new motor vehicle engines contribute to the GHG pollution which threatens public health and welfare. These actions will not themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities. However, it is a prerequisite to finalizing the EPA's proposed GHG emission standards for light-duty vehicles, which were jointly proposed by the EPA and Department of Transportation on September 15,2009. The EPA has recently proposed several standards to reduce GHG emissions from power plants and other stationary sources. On September 13, 2013 the EPA Administrator signed 40 CFR Part 60, that limits emissions from new sources to 1,100 pounds of CO2 per MWh for fossil fuel-fired utility boilers and 1,000 pounds of CO2 per MWh for large natural gas-fired combustion units. These new standards make it impossible to construct new coal powered plants based on current available technology. State—California Air Resources Board The California Air Resources Board (CARB), which is a part of the California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the coordination and administration of both federal and state air pollution control programs within California. In this capacity, the CARB conducts research, sets the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures,provides oversight of local programs, and prepares the SIP. The CAAQS for criteria pollutants • SUBTPMl9474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 15 City of Rancho Cucamonga - - are shown above in Table C. In addition, the CARB establishes emission standards for motor vehicles sold in California, consumer products (e.g. hairspray, aerosol paints, and barbeque lighter fluid), and various types of commercial equipment. It also sets fuel specifications to further reduce vehicular emissions.- The missions_The South Coast Air Basin has been designated by the CARB as a non-attainment area for ozone,NO2, PM 10,PM2.5 and lead. Currently,the South Coast Air Basin is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for CO, SO2, and sulfates and.is unclassified for visibility reducing particles and Hydrogen Sulfide. On June 20, 2002, the CARB revised the PM10 annual average standard to 20 µg/m3 and established an annual average standard for PM2.5 of 12 µg/m3. These standards were approved by the Office of Administrative Law in June 2003 and are now effective. On September 27,2007 the CARB approved the South Coast Air Basin and the Coachella Valley 2007 Air Quality Management Plan for Attaining the Federal 8-hour Ozone and PM2.5 Standards. The plan projects attainment for the 8-hour Ozone standard by 2024. On December 12, 2008 the CARB adopted Resolution 08-43, which limits NOx, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions from on-road diesel truck fleets that operate in California. On October 12, 2009 Executive Order R-09-010 was adopted that codified Resolution 08-43 into Section 2025, title 13 of the California Code of Regulations. This regulation requires that by the year 2023 all commercial diesel trucks that operate in California shall meet model year 2010 (Tier 4 Final) or latter emission standards. In the interim period, this regulation provides annual interim targets for fleet owners to meet. This regulation also provides a few exemptions including a onetime per year 3-day pass for trucks registered outside of California. CARB is also responsible for regulations pertaining to Toxic Air Contaminants(TACs). The Air Toxics "Hot Spots"Information and Assessment Act(Assembly Bill [AB]2588, 1987,Connelly)was enacted in 1987 as a means to establish a formal air toxics emission inventory risk quantification program.AB 2588, as amended, establishes a process that requires stationary sources to report the type and quantities of certain substances their facilities routinely release in California. The data is ranked by high,intermediate, and.low categories, which are determined by: the potency, toxicity, quantity, volume, and proximity of the facility to nearby receptors. CARB also proposed interim statewide CEQA thresholds for GHG emissions and released Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act, on October 24, 2008. The State currently has no regulations that establish ambient air quality standards for GHGs. However,the State has passed laws directing CARB.to develop actions to reduce GHG emissions,which are listed below. Assembly Bill 1493 California Assembly Bill 1493 (also known as the Pavley Bill, in reference to its author Fran Pavley)was enacted on July 22, 2002 and required CARB to develop and adopt regulations that reduce GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light duty trucks. In 2004,CARB approved the"Pavley I"regulations limiting the amount of GHGs that may be released from new passenger automobiles that are being phased in between model years 2009 through 2016. These regulation will reduce GHG emissions by 30 percent from 2002 levels by 2016. The second set of regulations"Pavley II"is currently in development and will be phased in between model years 2017 through 2025 and will reduce emissions by 45 percent by the year 2020. The Pavley II standards are being developed by linking the GHG emissions and formerly separate SUBTPM79474 DKNHotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 16 City of Rancho Cucamonga • toxic tailpipe emissions standards previously known as the "LEV 111" (third stage of the Low Emission Vehicle standards)into a single regulatory framework. In 2005, the CARB submitted a"waiver"-request to-the EPA-in order to-implement the GHG standards and in March of 2008, the U.S. EPA denied the request. However, in June 2009, the decision was reversed and the U.S. EPA granted California the authority to implement the GHG standards for passenger cars, pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles. In September 2009,the Pavley I regulations were adopted by CARB. Executive Order S-3-05 The California Governor issued Executive Order S 3-05,GHG Emission,in June 2005,which established the following reduction targets: • 2010: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels; • 2020: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels; • 2050:Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels. The executive order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA) to coordinate a multi-agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. To comply with the Executive Order,the secretary of CaIEPA created the California Climate Action Team(CAT),made up of members from various state agencies and commissions. The team released its first report in March 2006. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on the voluntary actions of businesses, local governments, and communities and through State incentive and regulatory programs. • Assembly Bill 32 In 2006, the California State Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. AB 32 requires CARB, to adopt rules and regulations that would achieve GHG emissions equivalent to statewide levels in 1990 by 2020 through an enforceable statewide emission cap which will be phased in starting in 2012. Emission reductions shall include carbon sequestration projects that would remove carbon from the atmosphere and utilize best management practices that are technologically feasible and cost effective. On December 6, 2007 CARB released the calculated Year 1990 GHG emissions of 427 million metric tons of CO2e(MMTCO2e). The 2020 target of 427 MMTCO2e requires the reduction of 169 MMTCO2e, or approximately 30 percent from the State's projected 2020 business as usual emissions of 596 MMTCO2e and the reduction of 42 MMTCO2e, or almost 10 percent from the 2002-2004 average GHG emissions. Under AB 32, CARB was required to adopt regulations by January 1, 2011 to achieve reductions in GHGs to meet the 1990 cap by 2020. Early measures CARB took to lower GHG emissions included requiring operators of the largest industrial facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons of CO2 in a calendar year to submit verification of GHG emissions by December 1, 2010. The CARB Board also approved nine discrete early action measures that include regulations affecting landfills, motor vehicle fuels,refrigerants in cars;port operations and other sources,all of which became enforceable on or before January 1,2010. On December 11,2008 the CARB Board approved a Scoping Plan,with final adoption May 11,2009 that proposed a variety of measures including direct regulations, alternative compliance mechanisms, monetary and non-monetary incentives,voluntary actions,a market-based cap-and-trade system, and a fee regulation to fund the program. In current pending litigation, Association of Irritated Residents v. California Air Resources Board, a California State trial court found that the analysis of the alternatives • SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 17 City ojRancho Cucamonga Item C,D132 identified in the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document (FED) was not sufficient for informed decision-making and public review under CEQA. In response,CARB has appealed the decision. In addition,CARB prepared the Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document, - Juner- 13,-201-L On-August-24;-201-1 CARB--recertified-the-complete-AB­-32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Environmental Document revised by the Final Supplement. In December, 2011 the Final Supplement was accepted as sufficient to fulfill the trial court's order. Senate Bill 1368 Senate Bill 1368 (SB 1368)is the companion Bill of AB 32 and was adopted September 2006. SB 1368 requires that the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) establish a performance standard for baseload generation of'GHG emissions by investor-owned utilities by February 1, 2007 and for local publicly owned utilities by June 30, 2007. These standards could not exceed the GHG emissions rate from a baseload combined-cycle, natural gas-fired plant. Furthermore, the legislation states that all electricity provided to the State, including imported electricity,must be generated by plants that meet the standards set by CPUC and California Energy Commission(CEC). Executive Order S-1-07 Executive Order S-1-07 was issued in 2007 and proclaims that the transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in the State, since it generates more than 40 percent of the State's GHG emissions. It establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels sold in the State by at least ten percent by 2020. This Order also directs CARB to determine whether this Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could be adopted as a discrete early-action measure as part of the effort to meet the mandates in AB 32. On April 23, 2009 CARB approved the proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard. The low carbon fuel standard is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions by about 16 MMT per year by 2020. The low carbon fuel standard is designed to provide a framework that uses market mechanisms to spur the steady introduction of lower carbon fuels. The framework establishes performance standards that fuel producers and importers must meet annually beginning in 2011. Separate standards are established for gasoline and diesel fuels and the alternative fuels that can replace each. The standards are "back- loaded", with more reductions required in the last five years, than during the first five years. This schedule allows for the development of advanced fuels that are lower in carbon than today's fuels and the market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, and flexible fuel vehicles. It is anticipated that compliance with the low carbon fuel standard will be based on a combination of both lower carbon fuels and more efficient vehicles. Reformulated gasoline mixed with corn-derived ethanol at ten percent by volume and low sulfur diesel fuel represent the baseline fuels. Lower carbon fuels may be ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, or blends of these fuels with gasoline or diesel as appropriate. Compressed natural gas and liquefied natural gas also may be low carbon fuels. Hydrogen and electricity, when used in fuel cells or electric vehicles are also considered as low carbon fuels for the low carbon fuel standard. Senate Bill 97 Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was adopted August 2007 and acknowledges that climate change is a prominent environmental issue that-requires analysis under CEQA. SB 97 directed the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR), which is part of the State Natural Resources Agency,to prepare, develop, and transmit to CARB guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG emissions, as required by CEQA,by July 1,2009. The Natural Resources Agency was required to certify and adopt those guidelines by January 1,2010. SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 18 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C.D133 Pursuant to the requirements of SB 97 as stated above, on December 30, 2009 the Natural Resources Agency adopted amendments to the State CEQA guidelines that address GHG emissions. The CEQA Guidelines Amendments changed 14 sections of the CEQA Guidelines and incorporated GHG language throughout the Guidelines.-Roweve%,no GHGemissions thresholds--of significance were provided-and no specific mitigation measures were identified. The GHG emission reduction amendments went into effect on March 18,2010 and are summarized below: • Climate action plans and other greenhouse gas.reduction plans can be used to determine whether a project has significant impacts,based upon its compliance with the plan. • Local governments are encouraged to quantify the greenhouse gas emissions of proposed projects,noting that they have the freedom to select the models and methodologies that best meet their needs and circumstances. The section also recommends consideration of several qualitative factors that may be used in the determination of significance, such as the extent to which the given project complies with state,regional,or local GHG reduction plans and policies. OPR does not set or dictate specific thresholds of significance. Consistent with existing CEQA Guidelines, OPR encourages local governments to develop and publish their own thresholds of significance for GHG impacts assessment. • When creating their own thresholds of significance, local governments may consider the thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies,or recommended by experts. • New amendments include guidelines for determining methods to mitigate the effects of greenhouse gas emissions in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines. • OPR is clear to state that"to qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must • be identified and incorporated into the project; general compliance with a plan, by itself, is not mitigation." • OPR's emphasizes the advantages of analyzing GHG impacts on an institutional, programmatic level. OPR therefore approves tiering of environmental analyses and highlights some benefits of such an approach. • Environmental impact reports(E1Rs)must specifically consider a project's energy use and energy efficiency potential. Senate Bills 1078. 107,and Xl-2 and Executive Orders S-14-08 and S-21-09 Senate Bill 1078 (SB 1078) requires retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned utilities and community choice aggregators, to provide at least 20 percent of their supply from renewable sources by 2017. Senate Bill 107(SB 107)changed the target date to 2010. Executive Order S-14-08 was signed on November 2008 and expands the State's Renewable Energy Standard to 33 percent renewable energy by 2020. Executive Order S-21-09 directed CARB to adopt regulations by July 31,2010 to enforce S-14-08. Senate Bill X1-2 codifies the 33 percent renewable energy requirement by 2020. Senate Bill 375 Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 and aligns regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS) or alternate planning strategy (APS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). CARB, in consultation with each MPO, will provide each affected region with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years ® 2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every four SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 19 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C.D134 years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. CARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO's sustainable communities strategy or alternate planning strategy for consistency with its assigned targets. City and County land use policies,including General Plans,are not required to be consistent with the RTP and associated SCS or APS. However,new provisions of CEQA would incentivize,through streamlining and other provisions,qualified projects that are consistent with an approved SCS or APS and categorized as"transit priority projects." Senate Bills 939 and 1374 Senate Bill 939 (SB 939)requires that each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills, whether through waste reduction,recycling or other means. Senate Bill 1374 (SB 1374) requires the California Integrated Waste Management Board to adopt a model ordinance by March 1, 2004 suitable for adoption by any local agency to require 50 to 75 percent diversion of construction and demolition of waste materials from landfills. California Code of Regulations(CCR)Title 24,Part 6 CCR Title 24, Part 6: California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24) were first established in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. The standards are updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. Although it was not originally intended to reduce GHG emissions, electricity production by fossil fuels results in GHG emissions and energy efficient buildings require less electricity. Therefore, increased energy efficiency results in decreased GHG emissions. The Energy Commission adopted 2008 Standards on April 23,2008 and Building Standards Commission approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. These updates became effective on August 1, 2009. On May 31, 2012 the Energy Commission adopted the proposed 2013 Building Standards that became effective on January 1, 2014. The new building standards include greater insulation in the attic, the use of cool roofing shingles and a minimum 1-inch air space between roof material and roof deck for all structures in San Bernardino County, as well as insulated and sealed ducting(www.askaroofer.com). The new building standards also require that all outdoor lighting have daylight sensors and motion sensors, which require the lighting power to be reduced to 40 percent power when no motion is detected and requires that vacancy sensors are installed in bathrooms,utility rooms and other spaces in residential buildings. The 2014 Building Standards are anticipated to reduce energy usage by 25 percent in residential buildings and 30 percent in commercial buildings over the 2008 Building Standards (h=:/Aighting.com/t24-smart-lip-,hting-standard) California Code of Regulations(CCR)Title 24,Part 11 CCR Title 24, Part I]: California Green Building Standards (Title 24) became effective in 2001 in response to continued efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. CCR Title 24, Part I 1 now require that new buildings reduce water consumption,employ building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and install low pollutant- emitting finish materials. One focus of CCR Title 24, Part 11 is water conservation measures, which reduce GHG emissions by reducing electrical consumption associated with pumping and treating water. CCR Title 24, Part 11 has approximately 52 nonresidential mandatory measures and an additional 130 provisions for optional use. Some key mandatory measures for commercial occupancies include specified parking for clean air vehicles,a 20 percent reduction of potable water use within buildings through use of SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 20 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D135 low-flow fixtures, a 50 percent construction waste diversion from landfills, and use of building finish materials that emit low levels of volatile organic compounds. Regional -, The SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the South Coast Air Basin. To that end, as a regional agency, the SCAQMD works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, and local governments and cooperates actively with all federal and state agencies. South Coast Air Ouality Management District SCAQMD develops rules and regulations, establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources, inspects emission sources, and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary,mobile,and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of AQMPs. The Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan(2012 AQMP)was adopted by the SCAQMD Board on December 7,2012 and was adopted by CARB via Resolution 13-3 on January 25,2013. The 2012 AQMP was prepared in order to meet the federal Clean Air Act requirement that all 24-hour PM2.5 non-attainment areas prepare a SIP, that were required to be submitted to the U.S. EPA by December 14, 2012 and demonstrate attainment with the 24-hour PM2.5 standard by 2014. The 2012 AQMP demonstrates attainment of the federal 24- hour PM2.5 standard by 2014 in the Basin through adoption of all feasible measures, and therefore, no extension of the attainment date is needed. The 2007 AQMP demonstrated attainment with the 1997 8-hour ozone (80 ppb) standard by 2023, through implementation of future improvements in control techniques and technologies. These "black • box" emissions reductions represent 65 percent of the remaining NOx emission reductions by 2023 in order to show attainment with the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Given the magnitude of these needed emissions reductions, additional NOx control measures have been provided in this AQMP even though the primary purpose of this AQMP is to show compliance with 24-hour PM2.5 emissions standards. The 2012 AQMP is designed to satisfy the California Clean Air Act's (CCAA) emission reductions of 5 percent per year or adoption of all feasible measures requirements and fulfill the EPA's requirement to update transportation conformity emissions budgets based on the latest approved motor vehicle emissions model and planning assumptions. The 2012 AQMP updates and revises the previous 2007 AQMP. The 2012 AQMP was prepared to comply with the Federal and State CCAA and amendments, to accommodate growth, to reduce the high pollutant levels in the Basin,to meet Federal and State ambient air quality standards, and to minimize the fiscal impact that pollution control measures have on the local economy. The purpose of the 2012 AQMP for the Basin is to set forth a comprehensive program that will lead this area into compliance with all federal and state air-quality planning requirements. The 2012 AQMP builds upon the approaches taken in the 2007 AQMP for the attainment of federal PM and ozone standards,and highlights the significant amount of reductions needed and the need to engage in interagency coordinated planning of mobile sources to meet all of the federal criteria pollutant standards. Compared with the 2007 AQMP, the 2012 AQMP utilizes revised emissions inventory projections that use 2008 as the base year. On-road emissions are calculated using CARB EMFAC2011 emission factors and the transportation activity data provided by SCAG from their 2012 Regional Transportation Plan (2012 RTP). Off-road emissions were updated using CARB's 2011 In-Use Off-Road Fleet Inventory Model. Since the 2007 AQMP was finalized new area source categories such as LPG transmission losses, storage tank and pipeline cleaning and degassing, and architectural colorants, were created and included in the emissions inventories. Composting waste was revised and now includes the emissions from green waste composting covered under SCAQMD Rule 1133.3. The 2012 AQMP also includes analysis of • SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 21 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C.D136 several additional sources of GHG emissions such as landfills and could also assist in reaching the GHG target goals in the AB32 Scoping Plan. The control measures in the 2012 AQMP-consist of three-components: l)-Basitr-wide and episodic short=- term PM2.5 measures; 2) Section 182(e)(5) implementation measures; and 3) Transportation control measures. Many of the control measures are not based on command and control regulations, but instead focus on incentives, outreach, and education to bring about emissions reductions through voluntary participation and behavioral changes. More broadly, a transition to zero- and near-zero emission technologies is necessary to meet 2023 and 2032 air quality standards and 2050 climate goals. Many of the same technologies will address both air quality and climate needs. Although SCAQMD is responsible for regional air quality planning efforts,it does not have the authority to directly regulate air quality issues associated with plans and new development projects throughout the Basin. Instead, this is controlled through local jurisdictions in accordance to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In order to assist local jurisdictions with air quality compliance issues the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD CEQA Handbook), prepared by SCAQMD, 1993, with the most current updates found at bM:Ywww.agmd.gov/cega/hdbk.htrnl,v�ga/hdbk.html, was developed in accordance with the projections and programs of the AQMP. The purpose of the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook is to assist Lead Agencies, as well as consultants, project proponents, and other interested parties in evaluating a proposed project's potential air quality impacts. Specifically, the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook explains the procedures that SCAQMD recommends be followed for the environmental review process required by CEQA. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook provides direction on how to evaluate potential air quality impacts,how to determine whether these impacts are significant,and how to mitigate these impacts. The.SCAQMD intends that by providing this guidance,the air quality impacts of plans and development proposals will be analyzed accurately and consistently throughout the Basin, and adverse impacts will be minimized. In order to assist local agencies with direction on GHG emissions, the SCAQMD organized a working group and adopted Rules 2700,2701,2702,and 3002 which are described below. SCAQMD Working Group Since neither CARB nor the OPR has developed GHG emissions threshold, the SCAQMD formed a Working Group to develop significance thresholds related to GHG emissions.At the September 28,2010 Working Group meeting, the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that either provides a quantitative annual thresholds of 3,500 MTCO2e for residential uses, 1,400 MTCO2e for commercial uses,and 3,000 MTCO2e for mixed uses.An alternative annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e for all land use types is also proposed. Rules 2700 and 2701 On December 5,2008, the SCAQMD adopted Rules 2700 and 2701,which establishes the administrative structure for a voluntary program designed to quantify GHG emission reductions. Rule 2700 establishes definitions for the various terms used in Regulation XXVII - Climate Change. Rule 2701 provides specific protocols for private parties to follow to generate certified GHG emission reductions for projects within the district. Approved protocols include forest projects, urban tree planting, and manure management. The SCAQMD is currently developing additional protocols for other reduction measures. For a GHG emission reduction project to qualify, it must be verified and certified by the SCAQMD Executive Officer, who has 60 days to approve or deny the Plan to reduce GHG emissions. Upon approval of the Plan, the Executive Officer issues required to issue a certified receipt of the GHG emission reductions within 90 days. SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C.D137 • Rule 2702 The SCAQMD adopted Rule 2702 on February 6, 2009, which establishes a voluntary air quality _ ..... investment,.program..from which SCAQMD can collect...,funds_from parties that desire certified GHG .. emission reductions,pool those funds,and use them to purchase or fund GHG emission reduction projects within two years,unless extended by the Governing Board. Priority will be given to projects that result in co-benefit emission reductions of GHG emissions and criteria or toxic air pollutants within environmental justice areas. Further,this voluntary program may compete with the cap-and-trade program identified for implementation in CARB's Scoping Plan,or a Federal cap and trade program. Rule 3002 The SCAQMD amended Rule 3002 on November 5, 2010 to include facilities that emit greater than 100,000 tons per year of COZe are required to apply for a Title V permit. A Title V permit is for facilities that are considered major sources of emissions. Southern California Association of Governments The SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles,Orange, Ventura,Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development and the environment. SCAG is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the majority of the southern California region and is the largest MPO in the nation. With respect to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the RTP/SCS and Regional Transportation Improvement Plan (RTIP), which addresses regional development and growth forecasts. These plans form the basis for the land use and transportation components of the AQMP, which are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and in the consistency analysis included in the AQMP. The RTP/SCS, • RTIP,and AQMP are based on projections originating within the City and County General Plans. Local City of Rancho Cucamonga Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Rancho Cucamonga, have the authority and responsibility to reduce air pollution through its police power and decision-making authority. Specifically, the City is responsible for the assessment and mitigation of air emissions resulting from its land use decisions. The City is also responsible for the implementation of transportation control measures as outlined in the 2007 AQMP and 2012 AQMP. Examples of such measures include bus turnouts,energy-efficient streetlights, and synchronized traffic signals. In accordance with CEQA requirements and the CEQA review process, the City assesses the air quality impacts of new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by conditioning discretionary permits, and monitors and enforces implementation of such mitigation. In accordance with the CEQA requirements, the City does not, however, have the expertise to develop plans, programs, procedures,and methodologies to ensure that air quality within the City and region will meet federal and state standards. Instead, the City relies on the expertise of the SCAQMD and utilizes the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook as the guidance document for the environmental review of plans and development proposals within its jurisdiction. 4.2 Monitored Aar Quality The air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air basin. Estimates.of the existing emissions in SCAB provided in the 2012 AQMP,indicate that collectively,mobile sources account for 59 percent of the VOC, 88 percent of the NOx emissions and 40 percent of directly emitted PM2.5, with another 10 percent of PM2.5 from road dust. SUBTPM19474 DKNHotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 23 City ojRancho Cucamonga Item C,D138 SCAQMD has divided the Basin into 38 air-monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The project site is located in air monitoring area 33,which covers the Southwestern portion of San Bernardino County. The nearest air monitoring station to the project site is the-Upland Monitoring-Station (Upland Station)-, which is located-approximately-14 miles northwest of the project site at 1350 San Bernardino Road, Upland. However, it should be noted that due to the air monitoring station's distance from the project site, recorded•air pollution levels at the Upland Station reflect with varying degrees of accuracy, local air quality conditions at the project site. Table E presents the monitored pollutant levels from the Upland Station. Table E—Local Area Air Quality Monitoring Summary Year Pollutant (Standard) 2010 2011 2012 Ozone: Maximum l-Hour Concentration(ppm) 0.131 0.145 0.136 Days>CAAQS(0.09 ppm) 31 36 42 Maximum 8-Hour Concentration(ppm) 0.097 0.122 0.111 Days>NAAQS(0.075 ppm) 39 36 45 Days;>CAAQs(0.070 ppm) 54 45 66 Carbon Monoxide: Maximum 1-Hour Concentration(ppm) 2.3 1.7 1.7 Days>NAAQS and CAAQS(20 ppm) 0 0 0 Maximum 8-Hour Concentration(ppm) 1.80 1.27 0.93 Days>NAAQS and CAAQS(9 ppm) 0 0 0 Nitrogen Dioxide: Maximum 1-Hour Concentration(ppb) 78.9 68.5 66.7 Days>NAAQS(100 ppb) 0 0 0 Inhalable Particulates(PM10): Maximum 24-Hour California Measurement(ug/m) 78.0 72.4 92.7 Days>NAAQS(150 ug/m3) 0 0 0 Days>CAAQS(50 ug/m3) Annual Arithmetic Mean(AAM)(ug/m3) 27.3 29.9 31.2 Annual>NAAQS(50 ug/m3) No No No Annual>CAAQS(20 ug/m3) Yes Yes Yes - Ultra-Fine Particulates(PM2.5): Maximum 24-Hour National Measurement(ug/rn ) 67.8 66.7 40.3 Days>NAAQS(35 ug/m3) __* —• — Annual Arithmetic Mean(AAM)(ug/m3) Annual>NAAQS and CAAQS(12 ug/m3) Notes:Exceedances are listed in bold. CAAQS=California Ambient Air Quality Standard;NAAQS—National Ambient Air Quality Standard, ppm=parts per million;ppb=parts per billion. Data obtained from Upland Station. 'Insufficient or no data. Source:tttDWwww arb ca goy/adam/ i SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 24 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D139 The monitoring data presented in Table E shows that ozone and particulate matter(PM10 and PM2.5)are the air pollutants of primary concern in the project area,which are detailed below: Ozone. During the last three years,the State 1-hour concentration standard for ozone has been exceeded between 31 and 42 days each year at the Upland Station. The State 8-hour ozone standard has been exceeded between 45 and 66 days each year over the past three years at the Upland Station. The Federal 8-how ozone standard was exceeded between 36 and 45 days each year over the past three years at the Upland Station. Ozone is a secondary pollutant as it is not directly emitted. Ozone is the result of chemical reactions between other pollutants, most importantly hydrocarbons and NO2, which occur only in the presence of bright sunlight. Pollutants emitted from upwind cities react during transport downwind to produce the oxidant concentrations experienced in the area. Many areas of Southern California contribute to the ozone levels experienced at this monitoring station, with the more significant areas being those directly upwind. Carbon Monoxide CO is another important pollutant that is due mainly to motor vehicles. The Upland Station, did not record an exceedance of the state or federal l-hour or 8-hour CO standards for the last three years. Nitrogen Dioxide The Upland Station, did not record an exceedance of the State or Federal NOZ standards for the last three years. Particulate Matter Over the past three years the Federal 24-hour standard for PM10 has not been exceeded at the Upland Station.Although the Federal 24-hour measurements for PM10 indicate that there have been exceedances of the State 24-how standard for PM10, no data was available at the Upland Station for the number of days that the State standard has been exceeded. The annual PM10 concentration at the Upland Station has exceeded the State standard for the past three years and has not exceeded the Federal standard for the past three years. Over the past three years the maximum 24-hour concentration appear to exceed the federal standard for PM2.5, however no data was available at the Upland Station for the number of days that the Federal standard has been exceeded. No data was available at the Upland Station for the annual average of PM2.5 emissions. There does not appear to be a noticeable trend for PM10 or PM2.5 in either maximum particulate concentrations or days of exceedances in the area. Particulate levels in the area are due to natural sources,grading operations,and motor vehicles. According to the EPA, some people are much more sensitive than others to breathing fine particles (PM 10 and PM2.5). People with influenza, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and the elderly may suffer worsening illness and premature death due to breathing these fine particles. People with bronchitis can expect aggravated symptoms from breathing in fine particles. Children may experience decline in lung function due to breathing in PM10 and PM2.5. Other groups considered sensitive are smokers and people who cannot breathe well through their noses. Exercising athletes are also considered sensitive,because many breathe through their mouths during exercise. SUBTPMl9474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 25 City of Rancho Cucamonga ]tp m r n 1 an 5.0 AIR QUALITY STANDARDS 5.1 Regional Air Quality Many air quality impacts that derive from dispersed mobile sources, which are the dominate pollution generators in the basin, often occurs hours later and miles away after photochemical processes have converted primary exhaust pollutants into secondary contaminants such as ozone. The incremental regional air quality impact of an individual project is generally very small and difficult to measure. Therefore, SCAQMD has developed significance thresholds based on the volume of pollution emitted rather than on actual ambient air quality because the direct air quality impact of a project is not quantifiable on a regional scale. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that any project in SCAB with daily emissions that exceed any of the identified significance thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. For the purposes to this air quality impact analysis, a regional air quality impact would be considered significant if emissions exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds identified in Table F. Table F—SCAQMD Regional Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day) VOC NOx CO sox PM10 PM2.5 Lead Construction 75 100 550 150 150 55 3 Operation 55 55 550 1.50 150 55 3 Source:hnp://www.agmd.goV/cegafiandbwk/signfta.pdf 5.2 Local Air Quality Project-related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to SCAB. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs)to assess the project-related air emissions in the project vicinity. SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology(LST Methodology), July 2008,which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The LST Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2,CO,PM 10,and PM2.5. The significance thresholds for the local emissions of NO2 and CO are determined by subtracting the highest background concentration from the last three years of these pollutants from Table D above, from the most restrictive ambient air quality standards for these pollutants that are outlined in the LSTs. Since PMIO and PM2.5 currently exceed the most restrictive ambient air quality standards in the Basin, their thresholds have been directly based on the LSTs and therefore, background concentrations of PM 10 and PM2.5 are not factored into the threshold. Table G below shows the LSTs for NO2,CO, and PM 10 and PM2.5 as well as the background concentrations and resultant significance concentrations. SUBTPM19474 DK1V Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 26 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C.D141 • Table G—SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance for Construction Significance _. Pollutant._... ._.._ SCAQMD LSTs' Background Levef Thresholds3 NOZ- 1-Hour Average(State) 0.18 ppm(338 pg/M3) 78.9 ppb(148 pg/m) 190µg/m3 CO- 1-Hour Average(State) 20 ppm(23,000µg/m3) 2.3 ppm(2,645 pg/ni ) 20,355 µg/m3 CO-8-Hour Average(State/Federal) 9.0 ppm(10,000 pg/m) 1.8 ppm(2,000 pg/m3) 8,000µg/m3 PM10-24 Hour Average 10.4 Ag/m3 -- 10.4µg/m3 PM2.5-24-Hour Average° 10.4µg/m3 -- 10.4µg/m3 Notes: 'Obtained from:http://www,aamd.gov/cegathandbook/sipi—h-rss.pdf. r Obtained from Table D above and based on the highest measured concentrations from the last 3 years at the Upland Station. 'Represents the maximum offsite concentrations allowed during operations. Based on SCAQMD Rule 403(dx3). 5.3 Toxic Air Contaminants According to the SCAQMD CEQA Handbook, any project that has the potential to expose the public to toxic air contaminants in excess of the following thresholds would be considered to have a significant air quality impact: • If the Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk is 10 in one million or greater;or • Toxic air contaminants from the proposed project would result in a Hazard Index increase of 1 or greater. In order to determine if the proposed project may have a significant impact related to hazardous air ® pollutants (HAP),the Health Risk Assessment Guidance for analyzing Cancer Risks from Mobile Source Diesel Idling Emissions for CEQA Air Quality Analysis, (Diesel Analysis) prepared by SCAQMD, August 2003, recommends that if the proposed project is anticipated to create HAPS through stationary sources or regular operations of diesel trucks on the project site, then the proximity of the nearest receptors to the source of the HAP and the toxicity of the HAP should be analyzed through a comprehensive facility-wide health risk assessment(HRA). 5.4 Odor Impacts The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that an odor impact would occur if the proposed project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402,which states: "A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury,detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals." If the proposed project results in a violation of Rule 402 with regards to odor impacts, then the proposed project would create a significant odor impact. • SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 27 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C.0142 5.5 Greenhouse Gases The proposed project is located within the jurisdiction of the SCAQMD. In order to identify significance criteria under CEQA for development-projects,SCAQMD initiated a Working Group,.which provided. . . detailed methodology for evaluating significance under CEQA. At the September 28, 2010 Working Group meeting, the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a.tiered approach that provides a quantitative annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e for mixed uses. Although the SCAQMD provided substantial evidence supporting the use of the above threshold, they have not been formally adopted because the SCAQMD is awaiting the outcome of the pending appeal of the California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), is resolved. Therefore, the proposed project would be considered to create a significant cumulative GHG impact if the proposed project would exceed the annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 28 City ojRancho Cucamonga Item C.13143 6.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS 6.1 CEQA Thresholds.ofSignifcance Consistent with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, a significant impact related to air quality and global climate change would occur if the proposed project is determined to result in: • Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; • Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation; • Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors); • Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; • Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. • Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment;or • Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. 6.2 Air Quality Compliance The proposed project may conflict with or obstruct implementation of the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan(AQMP). The following section discusses the proposed project's consistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan The California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable GPs and regional plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore,this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with the AQMP. The purpose of this discussion is to set forth the issues regarding consistency with the assumptions and objectives of the AQMP and discuss whether the proposed project would interfere with the region's ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards. If the decision-makers determine that the proposed project is inconsistent, the lead agency may consider project modifications or inclusion of mitigation to eliminate the inconsistency. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended GP Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP (except as provided for CO in Section 9.4 for relocating CO hot spots). • SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analyses Page 29 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D144 (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Both of these criteria are evaluated in the following sections Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations? Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in this report, short-term regional construction air emissions would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 5.1. With implementation of Mitigation Measure 1 short-term construction local concentrations of criteria pollutants will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD local thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 5.2. The long-term operation of the proposed project would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD thresholds of significance discussed in Section 5.1 above. The ongoing operation of the proposed project would generate air pollutant emissions that are inconsequential on a regional basis. The analysis for long-term local air quality impacts showed that local pollutant concentrations would not be projected to exceed the air quality standards. Therefore, no long-term impact would occur and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, based on the information provided above, which requires the implementation of Mitigation Measure 1,the proposed project would be consistent with the first criterion. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP? Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to insure that the analyses conducted for the proposed project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The 2012-2035 Regional Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy consists of three sections: Core Chapters, Ancillary Chapters, and Bridge Chapters. The Growth Management, Regional Mobility, Air Quality, Water Quality, and Hazardous Waste Management chapters constitute the Core Chapters of the document. These chapters currently respond directly to federal and state requirements placed on SCAG. Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this project, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Land Use Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in the AQMP. The project site is currently designated as Industrial Park (IP) and is within the Haven Avenue Overlay District(HAOD),which allows for hotel and office land uses. The proposed project is consistent with the current land use designation and would not require a General Plan Amendment *or zone change. Therefore,the proposed project would not result in an inconsistency with the current land use designation. Therefore, the proposed project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. Based on the above, the proposed project will not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore,with implementation of Mitigation Measure 1,a less than significant impact will occur. Level of Significance Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 36 City oJRancho Cucamonga Item C,13145 Mitieation Measure 1 The project applicant shall require that the grading contractor to comply with all applicable measures listed in SCAQMD Rule 403 to control fugitive dust including the application of water to all ekposed'surfices'A minimum-of thiee times per day, throughout the duration'of grading operations. Level of Significance After Mitigation Less than significant impact. 6.3 Air Quality Standard Violation The proposed project may violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. The following section calculates the potential air emissions associated with the construction and operations of the proposed project and compares the emissions to the SCAQMD standards. Construction Emissions The proposed project would consist of the construction of a 126-room hotel, a 5,000 square foot office building, and a total of 143 parking spaces on the approximately 3-acre project site. The construction emissions have been analyzed for both regional and local air quality impacts as well as potential toxic air impacts and odor impacts. Construction-Related Regional Impacts The following provides a discussion of the methodology used to calculate regional construction air • emissions and an analysis of the proposed project's short-term construction emissions for the criteria pollutants. Methodology Typical emission rates from construction activities were obtained from CaIEEMod Version 2013.2.2. CaIEEMod is a computer model published by the SCAQMD for estimating air pollutant emissions. The CaIEEMod program uses the EMFAC201 I computer program to calculate the emission rates specific for San Bernardino County for construction-related employee vehicle trips and the OFFROAD201 l computer program to calculate emission rates for heavy truck operations. EMFAC2011 and OFFROAD2011 are computer programs generated by CARB that calculates composite emission rates for vehicles. Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or grams per running hour. Using CaIEEMod,the peak daily air pollutant emissions during each phase was calculated and presented below. These emissions represent the highest level of emissions for each of the construction phases in terms of air pollutant emissions. The construction emissions printouts from CaIEEMod are provided in Appendix A. The phases of construction activities that have been analyzed below are: 1) grading, 2) building construction,3)paving,and 4)application of architectural coatings. Grading The grading phase is anticipated to start in the late spring and is anticipated to take a week to complete. The proposed grading is balanced, which would result in no dirt being imported or exported from the project site: The grading activities would require up to 15 worker trips per day. In order to account for the air emissions from water trucks, six vendor truck trips per day were added to the grading phase. The onsite equipment would consist of the simultaneous operation of one excavator, one grader, one rubber ® SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions s Analysis Page 31 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D146 tired dozer, and three of either a tractor, loader or backhoe, which is based on the .CaIEEMod default equipment mix. Building Construction...._. ._ .. .. . ._ _.. _. The building construction would occur after the completion of the grading phase. The building construction phase was modeled based on the construction of a 126 room hotel and 5,000 square feet of general office building. Building construction was modeled as occurring over a ten month period. The building construction. would require up to 79 worker trips and 31 vendor trips per day. The onsite equipment would consist of the simultaneous operation of one crane,three forklifts,one generator set,one welder, and three of either a tractor, loader, or backhoe, which is based on the CaIEEMod default equipment mix. Paving The paving would occur after the completion of the building construction phase. The paving phase was modeled based on the paving of the 143 space parking lot that would pave approximately 1.29 acres of the project site. The paving activities would occur over two weeks and would require up to 20 worker trips per day. The onsite equipment would consist of the simultaneous operation of two cement mixers, one paver, two paving equipment, two rollers, and one of either a tractor, loader, or backhoe, which is based on the CaIEEMod default equipment mix. Architectural Coating The application of architectural coatings would occur after the completion of the paving phase. Per SCAQMD Rule 1113, the architectural coatings that would be applied after January 1, 2014 will be limited to an average of 50 grams per liter or less and the CaIEEMod model default VOC emissions for non-residential interior architectural coatings have been adjusted accordingly. The architectural coating phase was modeled based on covering 93,991 square feet of non-residential exterior area and 281,973 square feet of non-residential interior area. The architectural coating phase would occur over five weeks and would require up to 16 worker trips per day. The onsite equipment would consist of one air compressor,which is based on the CaIEEMod default equipment mix. Project.lmpacts The construction-related criteria pollutant emissions for each phase are shown below in Table H. Table H shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. i SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 32 City ojRancho Cucamonga Item C,D147 ® Table H-Construction-Related Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day) Activity. YOC.... NOx...... CO......_ S02..-.. PM10 PM2.5 Grading On-Site' 3.87 41.10 26.75 0.03 8.92 5.55 Off-Site' 0.15 0.80 2.01 0.00 0.22 0.07 Total 4.02 41.90 28.76 0.03 9.14 5.62 Building Construction On-Site 3.87 31.25 18.93 0.03 2.23 2.10 Off-Site 0.78 4.16 10.51 0.02 1.16 0.36 Total 4.65 35.41 29.44 0.05 339 2.46 Paving On-Site 2.30 20.31 12.68 0.02 1.22 1.13 Off-Site 0.10 0.12 1.53 0.00 0.23 0.06 Total 2.40 20.43 14.21 0.02 1.45 1.19 Architectural Coatings On-Site 70.11 2.57 1.90 0.00 0.22 0.22 Off-Site 0.08 0.10 1.23 0.00 0.18 0.05 Total 70.19 2.67 3.13 0.00 0.40 0.27 SCQAMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 'Onsite emissions from equipment not operated on public roads. 2 Offsite emissions from vehicles operating on public roads. • Source:Ca]EEMod Version 2013.2.2. Construction-Related Local Impacts Construction-related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Basin. The proposed project has been analyzed for the potential local air quality impacts created from: construction-related fugitive dust and diesel emissions; from toxic air contaminants; and,from construction-related odor impacts. Local Air Quality Impacts from Construction The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed through utilizing the methodology described in Localized Significance Threshold Methodology(LST Methodology),prepared by SCAQMD, revised October 2009. The LST Methodology found the primary emissions of concern are NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. In order to determine if any of these pollutants require a detailed analysis of the local air quality impacts,each phase of construction was screened using the SCAQMD's Mass Rate LST Look- up Tables. The Look-up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily onsite emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. The emission thresholds were calculated based on the Southwest San Bernardino Valley source receptor area and a disturbance of two acres which is the nearest acreage available to the project site. The nearest off-site sensitive receptors to the proposed project are office buildings, located as near as 70 feet south of the project site.According to the LST Methodology,any receptor located closer than 25 meters (82 feet) ® SUBTPM19474 DKNHotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 33 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D148 shall be based on the 25-meter thresholds. Table I shows the onsite emissions from the CalEEMod model for the different construction phases and the calculated emissions thresholds. Table 1-Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors Prior to Mitigation Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day) Phase NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Grading 41.10 26.75 8.92 5.55 Building Construction 31.25 18.93 2.23 2.10 Paving 20.31 12.68 1.22 1.13 Architectural Coatings 2.57 1.90 0..22 0.22 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters(82 feet)or less' 170 1,232 6 5 Exceeds Threshold? No No Yes Yes Notes: 'The nearest sensitive receptors are office uses as near as 82 feet south of the project site.According to LST methodology any receptor closer than 25 meters should be based on the 25-meter threshold. Source: Vista Environmental,calculated from Ca1EEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look-up Tables for two acres in Southwest San Bernardino Valley. The data provided in Table I show that during the grading phase, PM10 and PM2.5 would exceed the local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors. This would be considered a significant impact. Mitigation Measure 1 is provided that would require the grading contractor to comply with all applicable measures listed in SCAQMD Rule 403 to control fugitive dust including the application of water to all exposed surfaces a minimum of three times per day during the duration of grading activities. The emissions reductions associated with implementation of Mitigation Measure 1 were calculated using CaIEEMod and the results are shown in Table J. Table J-Mitigated Local Construction Emissions at the Nearest Receptors Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day) Phase NOx . CO PM10 PM2.5 Grading 41.10 26.75 4.93 3.50 Paving 31.25 18.93 2.23 2.10 Building Construction 20.31 12.68 1.22 1.13 Architectural Coatings 2.57 1.90 022 0.22 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters(82 feet)or less' 170 1,232 6 5 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 'The nearest sensitive receptors are office uses as near as 82 feet south of the project site.According to LST methodology any receptor closer than 25 meters should be based on the 25-meter threshold. Source: Vista Environmental, calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look-up Tables for two acres in Southwest San Bernardino Valley. Table J shows that with implementation of Mitigation Measure 1, local PM10 and PM2.5 emissions during grading activities would be reduced to within SCAQMD's local emissions thresholds. Therefore, local construction emissions would be reduced to a level of less than significant with mitigation. Construction-Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project According to SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 34 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,13149 SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of "individual cancer risk". "Individual Cancer Risk" is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of toxic air contaminants over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer,based on the use of standard risk-assessment methodology:- Given the relatively limited number of heavy-duty construction equipment and the short-term construction schedule,the proposed project would not result in a long-term (i.e., 70 years)substantial source of toxic air contaminant emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk. Therefore, no significant short-term toxic air contaminant impacts would occur during construction of the proposed project. Operational Emissions The on-going operation of the proposed project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the project-generated vehicle trips and through operational emissions from the on-going use of the proposed project. The following section provides an analysis of potential long-term air quality impacts due to:regional air quality and local air quality impacts with the on-going operations of the proposed project. The potential operations-related air emissions have been analyzed below for the regional and local criteria pollutant emissions and cumulative impacts. Operations-Related Criteria Pollutant Analysis The operations-related criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed through use of the CaIEEMod model. The proposed project was analyzed in the CalEEMod model based on a 126 room hotel, 5,000 square feet of general office building, and a 143 space parking lot. The operating emissions were based on the year 2015, which is the anticipated opening year for the proposed project. The operations daily emissions printouts from the CalEEMod model are provided in Appendix A. The CalEEMod analyzes operational emissions from area sources, energy usage,and mobile sources, • which are discussed below. Mobile Sources Mobile sources include emissions the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed project. The vehicle trips associated with the proposed project have been analyzed by inputting the project-generated vehicular trips from the Revised Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Analysis: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19474, DKN Hotels, 10051 6th Street, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Traffic Memorandum), prepared by Arch Beach Consulting, September 19, 2013, into the CalEEMod Model. The Traffic Memorandum found that the proposed project would create 841 round trips per day, which is based on trip generation rates of 6.24 trips per hotel room and 11.03 trips per 1,000 square feet of general office uses. Area Sources Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural coatings. The area source emissions were based on the on-going use of the proposed hotel and office uses in the CaIEEMod model. No changes were made to the default area source parameters. Energy Usage Energy usage includes emissions from natural gas used on-site. The energy usage was based on the on- going use of the proposed hotel and office uses in the CaIEEMod model. No changes were made to the default energy usage parameters. Project Impacts The worst-case summer or winter VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, PM 10, and PM2.5 emissions created from the ® proposed project's long-term operations have been calculated and are summarized below in Table K. SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 35 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D150 Table K—Operational Air Pollution Emissions Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day) ActivityyOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources' 4.94 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage2 0.34 3.10 2.60 0.02 0.24 024 Mobile Sources' 3.43 9.32 35.50 0.07 4.48 128 Total Emissions 8.71 12.42 38.13 0.09 4.72 1.5$ SCQAMD Operational Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No . No Notes: Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products,architectural coatings,and landscaping equipment. Z Energy usage consist of emissions from natural gas usage. 'Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. Source:Vista Environmental,calculated from CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2. The data provided in Table K above shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the proposed project. Operations-Related Local Air Quality Impacts Project-related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the SCAB. The proposed project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emission impacts from the project-generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on-site operations. The following analysis analyzes the vehicular CO emissions, local impacts from on-site operations, toxic air contaminant impacts from on-site diesel trucks, and odor impacts. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project-Generated Vehicular Trips CO.is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason,CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal. CO standards which were presented in Section 5.0 above. To determine if the proposed project could cause emission levels in excess of the CO standards discussed above in Section 5.2, a.sensitivity analysis is typically conducted to determine the potential for CO "hot spots"at a number of intersections in the general project vicinity. Because of reduced speeds and vehicle queuing,"hot spots"typically occur at intersections with a Level of Service(LOS)E or worse. The LOS is a measure used by traffic engineers to quantify the delay that occurs at intersections from additional vehicular traffic. When an intersection operates at LOS E or F, SCAQMD recommends performing a CO hotspot analysis if the volume to capacity ratio increases by two percent or more. The Traffic Memorandum prepared for the proposed project found that no analyzed intersection would operate a LOS E or worse. Therefore no CO"hotspot"modeling was performed and no significant long- term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on-going use of the proposed project. SUB 7PM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 36 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,131 51 • Local Air Quality Impacts from Onsite Operations Project-related air emissions from on-site sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, onsite usage-of naturalgas appliances as well as the.operation of vehicles onsite may-have the potentiat to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the South Coast Air Basin. The local air quality emissions from onsite operations were analyzed according to the methodology described in Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, prepared by SCAQMD, revised October 2009. The Look-up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. The proposed project was analyzed based on the Southwest San Bernardino Valley source receptor area and a two acre project site. The nearest off-site sensitive receptors to the proposed project are office buildings, located as near as 70 feet south of the project site.According to the LST Methodology, any receptor located closer than 25 meters (82 feet) shall be based on the 25-meter thresholds. Table L shows the onsite emissions from the CalEEMod model that includes natural gas usage, landscape maintenance equipment, and vehicles operating onsite and offsite and the calculated emissions thresholds. 'fable L—Local Operational Emissions at the Nearest Receptors Pollutant Emissions(pounds/day) Emissions Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources' 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 3.10 2.60 0.24 0.24 Mobile Sources' 1.17 4.44 0.56 0.19 • Total Emissions 4.27 7.07 0.80 0.43 SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters(82 feet)or less' 170 1,232 2 2 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 'Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products,architectural coatings,and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consist of emissions from onsite natural gas usage. 'Onsite vehicle emissions based on 1/8 of the gross vehicular emissions and road dust. 'The nearest sensitive receptors are office uses as near as 82 feet south of the project site.According to LST methodology any receptor closer than 25 meters should be based on the 25-meter threshold. Source: Vista Environmental,calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look-up Tables for two acres in Southwest San Bernardino Valley. The data provided in Table L shows that the on-going operations of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 5.2. Therefore,the on-going operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations- related impact to local air quality due to on-site emissions and no mitigation would be required. Operations-Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts Particulate matter(PM)from diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in most areas and according to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2009 Edition, prepared by CARB, about 80 percent of the outdoor TAC cancer risk is from diesel exhaust. Some chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde have been listed as carcinogens by State Proposition 65 and the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants program. Due to the nominal number of diesel truck trips generated by the proposed project,a less than significant toxic air contaminant impact would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project and no mitigation would be required. • SUBTPMl4 9 74 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 37 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D152 Level of Significance Before Mitigation Potentially significant impact. Mitigation Measures Mitigation Measure 1 provided in Section 6.2. Level of Significance After Mitigation Less than significant impact. 6.4 Net Increase in Non Attainment Pollution The proposed project may result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard(including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors). Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the project area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel throughout the local area. Therefore,from an air quality standpoint,the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patters are considered would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the project's air quality must be generic by nature. The project area is out of attainment for both ozone and PM 10 and PM2.5 particulate matter. Construction and operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of the Basin. Construction-Related Cumulative Impacts The project site is located in the Basin,which is currently designated by the EPA as a non-attainment area for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. The ozone, PMIO, and PM2.5 emissions associated with the proposed project have been calculated above in Section 63. The above analysis found that development of the proposed project would result in less than significant regional and local emissions of the precursors to ozone, PM10 and PM23 during construction of the proposed project. Mitigation Measure I has been provided to reduce the construction-related PM10 and PM2.5 to less than significant levels. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure 1,a less than significant cumulative impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. Operational-Related Cumulative Impacts The greatest cumulative operational impact on the air quality to the Basin will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. The data provided in Section 6.3 above shows that for the on-going operations activities for the proposed project, the VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, PM 10, and PM2.5 emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance discussed above in Section 5.0. With respect to long-tern emissions, this project would create a less than significant cumulative impact and no mitigation would be required. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 7UBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 38 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D153 • 6 5 Sensitive Receptors The proposed project may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The local concentrations of emissions produced in the nearby-vicinity of the proposed project,which may expose. sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations have been calculated above in Section 6.3 for both construction and operations,which are discussed separately below. Construction-Related Sensitive Receptor Impacts The nearest off-site sensitive receptors to the proposed project are office buildings, located as near as 70 feet south of the project site. The analysis in Section 6.3 above found that development of the proposed project would result in locally significant emissions of PM10 and PM2.5 during construction of the proposed project. Mitigation Measure 1 has been provided to reduce the construction-related PM10 and PM2.5 to less than significant levels. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measure 1,exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations would be reduced to a less than significant impact during construction activities. Operations-Related Sensitive Receptor Impacts The on-going operations of the proposed project may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project from on-site operations, or near intersections where the proposed project would substantially increase the vehicular traffic and resultant CO concentrations. The nearest off-site sensitive receptors to the proposed project are office buildings, located as near as 70 feet south of the project site. The analysis provided above in Section 6.3 found that none of the analyzed • criteria pollutants would exceed the calculated local emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors to the project site for operational activities. CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential impacts to sensitive receptors. The analysis provided above in Section 6.3 shows that the proposed project would not decrease the Level of Service (LOS) at any analyzed intersection to LOS E or worse and no analyzed intersection would operate at a LOS E or worse from development of the proposed project. Therefore, the exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations would be reduced to a less than significant impact during operational activities. ]Level of Significance Less than significant impact. &6 Objectionable Odors The proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Potential odor impacts have been analyzed separately for construction and operations below. Individual responses to odors are highly variable and can result in a variety of effects. Generally, the impact of an odor results from a variety of factors such as frequency, duration, offensiveness, location, and sensory perception. The frequency is a measure of how often an individual is exposed to an odor in the ambient environment. The intensity refers to an individual's or group's perception of the odor strength or concentration. The duration of an odor refers to the elapsed time over which an odor is experienced. The offensiveness of the odor is the subjective rating of the pleasantness or unpleasantness ® SUBTPM19474 DKNHotels Project r Project,Ar Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 39 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D154 of an odor. The location accounts for the type of area in which a potentially affected person lives,works, or visits;the type of activity in which he or she is engaged;and the sensitivity of the impacted receptor. Sensory perception has-four major components: detectability.-intensity-,character,and hedonic toner The detection(or threshold)of an odor is based on a panel of responses to the odor. There are two types of thresholds: the odor detection threshold and the recognition threshold. The detection threshold is the lowest concentration of an odor that will elicit a response in a percentage of the people that live and work in the immediate vicinity of the project site and is typically presented as the mean (or 50 percent of the population). The recognition threshold is the minimum concentration that is recognized as having a characteristic odor quality, this is typically represented by recognition by 50 percent of the population. The intensity refers to the perceived strength of the odor. The odor character is what the substance smells like. The hedonic tone is a judgment of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of the odor. The hedonic tone varies in subjective experience, frequency,odor character,odor intensity,and duration. Construction-Related Odor Impacts Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement, paints and solvents and from emissions from diesel equipment. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process would be temporary and would not likely be noticeable for extended periods of time beyond the project site's boundaries. Odor emission during construction would be short-term in nature and limited to the operational time of diesel equipment and the amounts of odor producing materials being utilized,which would result in transitory odor impacts at the nearby residences that would not be anticipated to impact 50 percent of the nearby population at any time. Therefore, a less than significant odor impact would occur and no mitigation would be required. Potential Operations-Related Odor Impacts Potential sources that may emit odors during the on-going operations of the proposed project would primarily occur from odor emissions from the trash storage areas and utilization of solvents and other chemicals associated with the proposed pool and cleaning supplies. The use of solvents and other chemicals would be for limited durations and would not likely be noticeable for extended periods of time beyond the project site's boundaries. Pursuant to City regulations,.permanent trash enclosures that protect trash bins from rain as well as limit air circulation would be required for the trash storage areas. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the project site and through compliance with SCAQMD's Rule 402, no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project. Therefore,a less than significant odor impact would occur and no mitigation would be required. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 6.7 Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions The proposed project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed project would consist of the development of a 126- room hotel,a 5,000 square foot office building,and would provide a total of 143 parking spaces and eight bicycle parking spaces. The proposed project would also provide 36,809 square feet of landscaped area and include the planting of a minimum of 140 trees in the parking lot areas. The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage, and construction equipment. The proposed trees are anticipated to provide a reduction in GHG emissions through sequestration. SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 40 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D155 • The following provides the methodology used to calculate the project-related GHG emissions,the project impacts and a consistency analysis of the proposed project with any applicable GHG reduction plans, policies or regulations. Methodology The CaIEEMod Version 2013.2.2 was used to calculate the GHG emissions from the proposed project. Each source of GHG emissions is described in greater detail below. Area Sources Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural coatings. The area source emissions were based on the on-going use of the proposed hotel and general office uses in the CaIEEMod model.No changes were made to the default area source parameters. Energy Usage Energy usage includes emissions from the electricity and natural gas used on-site. The energy usage was based on the on-going use of the proposed hotel and general office uses in the CalEEMod model. No changes were made to the default energy usage parameters. Mobile Sources Mobile sources include emissions the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed project. The vehicle trips associated with the proposed project have been analyzed by inputting the project-generated vehicular trips from the Traffic Memorandum into the CalEEMod Model. The Traffic Memorandum found that the proposed project would create 841 round trips per day, which is based on trip generation • rates of 6.24 trips per hotel room and 11.03 trips per 1,000 square feet of general office uses. Solid Waste Waste includes the GHG emissions associated with the processing of waste from the proposed project as well as the GHG emissions from the waste once it is interred into a landfill.The analysis was based on the default CaIEEMod waste generation rates of 68.98 tons of solid waste per year from the hotel and 4.65 tons of solid waste per year from the general office building. All emission factors were based on the default emission levels in the CaIEEMod model. Water and Wastewater Water includes the GHG emissions from the treatment of water and conveyance of water to the project site. The analysis was based on the default CalEEMod water usage rates of 4,084,881 gallons per year of indoor water usage and 899,802 gallons per year of outdoor water usage for the proposed hotel and office uses. All emission factors were based on the default emission levels in the CalEEMod model. Construction The construction-related GHG emissions were also included in the analysis and were based on a 30-year amortization rate as recommended in the SCAQMD GHG Working Group meeting on November 19, 2009. The construction-related GHG emissions were calculated by CalEEMod and detailed above in Section 6.3. Vegetation Development of the proposed project would include the planting of a minimum of 140 trees in the parking lot areas,which have been analyzed as 140 miscellaneous species trees in the CaIEEMod model. SUBTPMl9474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 41 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D156 Project Greenhouse Gas Emissions The project's GHG emissions have been calculated with CalEEMod model based on the parameters detailed above. A summary of the results is shown below in Table M and CalEEMod model run for the proposed project is provided in Appendix B. Table M-Project Related Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions _ Greenhouse Gas Emissions(Metric Tons per Year) Category Bio-CO2 NonBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH, N20 COZe Area Sources 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 Energy Usage 0.00 1,691.85 1,691.85 0.06 0.02 1,699.80 Mobile Sources 0.00 .943.25 943.25 0.04 0.00 944.10 Solid Waste4 14.95 0.00 14.95 0.88 0.00 33.50 Water and Wastewaters 1.30 18.08 19.38 0.13 0.00 23.22 Construction 0.00 15.08 15.08 0.00 0.00 15.14 Trees -99.12 Total Emissions 16.25 2,668.27 2,684.52 1.11 0.02 2,616.65 SCAQMD Draft Residential Threshold of Significance 3,000 Notes: 'Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products,architectural coatings,and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 'Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. `Waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. s Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. Source:CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2 for year 2015. The data provided in Table M above shows that the proposed project would create 2,616.65 MTCO2e per year. According to the SCAQMD draft residential threshold of significance detailed above in Section 5.0, a cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the on-going operations would exceed 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, a less than significant generation of greenhouse gas emissions would occur from development and operation of the proposed project. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 6.8 Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency The proposed projectwould not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not yet have a Climate Action Plan or Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan. Instead, the City relies on the expertise of the SCAQMD and utilizes the SCAQMD as guidance for the environmental review of plans and development proposals within its jurisdiction. Therefore,the SCAQMD's GHG emission threshold is applicable to the proposed project. In order to identify significance criteria under CEQA for development projects, SCAQMD initiated a Working Group, which provided detailed methodology for evaluating significance under CEQA. At the September 28,2010 Working Group meeting,the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that provides a quantitative annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e for mixed-use projects. Although the SCAQMD provided substantial evidence supporting the use of the above threshold, they have not been formally adopted because the SCAQMD is awaiting the outcome of the pending appeal of the California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District(BAAQMD),is resolved. SUBTPM19474 DKIV Hotels Project,Air Quality anal Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 42 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D157 According to the project GHG emissions calculations above, implementation of the proposed project would result in the generation of 2,616.65 MTCO2e per year. The proposed project would be below the SCAQMD's proposed threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the-purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Level of Signif Cance Less than significant impact. • SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Q ty y Page 43 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D158 7.0 REFERENCES Arch Beach Consulting, Revised Trip Generation, Distribution, and Assignment Analysis: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19474, DKN Hotels, 10501-6*Street, City of Rancho Cucamonga, September 19, 2013. California Air Resources Board,Appendix 1171 Risk Characterization Scenarios,October 2000. California Air Resources Board,Resolution 08-43, December 12,2008. California Air Resources Board, Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act, on October 24,2008. California Department of Conservation, A General Guide for Ultramafic Rocks in California —Areas More Likely to Contain Naturally Occurring.Asbestos,August,2000. City of Rancho Cucamonga,Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19,2010. Environmental Protection Agency, Nonattainment Major New Source Review Implementation Under 8- Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard:Reconsideration,June 30,2005. South Coast Air Quality Management District,2007 Air Quality Management Plan, June 1,2007. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Revised Draft 2012 Air Quality Management Plan, September,2012. South Coast Air Quality Management District,Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod, February 2011. South Coast Air Quality Management District,CEQA Air Quality Handbook;April 1993. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, Revised July 2008. South Coast Air Quality Management District,Rule 402 Nuisance, Adopted May 7, 1976. South Coast Air Quality Management District,Rule 403 Fugitive Dust, Amended June 3,2005. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Draft Report Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin,MATES III,January 2008. Southern California Association of Governments, 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy,April 2012. University of California, Davis, Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol, December 1997. U.S. Geological Survey, Reported Historic Asbestos Mines, Historic Asbestos Prospects, and Other Natural Occurrences of Asbestos in California, 2011. SUBTPM19474 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Page 44 City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C,D159 ® APPENIDIX A CalEEMod Model Daily Printouts ® SUBTPMI9 7 4 4 DKN Hotels Project,Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Appendix A City of Rancho Cucamonga Item CO 160 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM19474 San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage General Office Building 5.00 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 1 0 -----------------------------;--------------------------- •-------------S ace-------------1--------------- ParkingLot 143.00 -----------------�--------------- ------------------------••-- P 1.29 1,000.00 � 0 3 ------------------------------�-------------- -------------- ote 126.00 Room 1.60 182,952.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics t Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 v Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2015 a Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics- Land Use- 126 Room Hotel on 1.6 acres, 5,000 sq ft General Office Building, 143 space perking lot on 1.29 acre Construction Phase-Construction schedule provided by applicant. Trips and VMT-6 vendor trips added to the Grading Phase in order to account for water trucks Architectural Coating - Per SCAQMD Rule 1113 all interior architectural coatings will be limited to 50 grams VOC per liter. Vehicle Trips-Trip rates from Revised Trip Generation Analysis. Sequestration -A minimum of 140 new trees added to project site. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation-Mitigation Measure 1 -Water all exposed areas 3x per day CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM tblArchitecturalCoating EF-Nonresidential-Interior 250.00 i 50.00 ---.------ st----nPh ------•- ----------------------------- --------------------------- --------- 25 0 • ----------N- Days 10.00 i -0 ----------------------------4- ----------------4_------------------------------f-------------------------- ----------------------------- - _ tblLandUse ; - -LandUseSquareFeet ; 57,200.00 i 1,000.00 tblLandUse ------ o cr ------- -----------------------------4----------- _ _ _ L to eage 4.20 1 1.60 ---------- ------------------4 -----------------4------------------------------}..- --- -- - - - t ro ectCharacteristics ; Operationaffear 2014 1 2015 ----------------------------- tblSeq 4 uestration ; NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 140.00 -----------------------------4----------•------------------4------------------------------ -------------------------- tb Tri sAndVMT ; VendorTripNumber 0.00 i 6.00 ------ i tblVehicleTrips ST TR + _ ---- 2.37- i 11.03 -----------------------------tbNehicleTrips -------------- --------------- - - -- --ST TR ----------- -------- ------------ 8 19 i 6.24 --------------i-----s------- --------•--SU_TR --------- ----------------------------- ---------- -4• 4- i ' 0.98 i 11.03 -----------------------------4----- ---------- ---------------- ' ------------- ------------- ----------- tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 + 6.24 _4_ tblVehicleTrips _ 4---------- 11_--------------- ---------------11.03 - WD TR 01 1 3 --------- --------------------4---------- ------------••---4------------------------------ r 1 tblVehicleTrips WD-TR 8.17 6.24 rn "' 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction 2014 4.6440 41.8758 29.4352 0.0446 6.7577 2.3864 9.1441 3.4227 2.1955 5.6182 i 0.0000 4,382.386'4,382.386- 0.9461 0.0000 '4,402.253 ., + 1 1 ----------- ------ +------- -------T--------------+---------- ' 8 2015 70.1873 33.5586 28.1500 0.0447 1.0778 2.1775 ' 3.2553 ' 0.2898 ' 2.0462 ' 2.3360 1 0.0000 '4,330.199'4,330.199- 0.7304 - 0.0000 ?4.345.537 i 4 4 1 i Total 74.8313 75.4344 57.5852 0.0893 P355 4.5639 12.3994 1 3.7125 4.2417 1 7.9542 0.0000 8,712.585'8,712.585' 1.6765 0.0000 '8,747.790 5 5 g r+ fD 3 Mitigated Construction 0 M LO 2014 4.6440 41.8758 29.4352 0.0446 2.7608 2.3864 5.1472 1.3686 2.1955 3.5641 i 0.0000 4.382.386'4,382.386- 0.9461 0.0000 14.402.253 8 .. i , 2015 70.1873 33.5586 ' 28.1500 0.0447 ' 1.0778 ' 2.1775 3.2553 ' 0.2898 ' 2.0462 ' 2.3360 + 0.0000 '4,330.199'4,330.199' 0.7304 0.0000 •4,345.537 ' ' 1 4 4 1 t Total 74.8313 1 75.4344 1 57.5852 1 0.0893 1 3.8386 4.5639 8.4025 1.6583 1 4.2417 5.9001 0.0000 8,712.585 1 8,712.585' 1.6765 0.0000 8,747.790 5 5 8 Percent 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 51.01 1 0.00 32.23 1 55.33 1 0.00 1 25.82 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Area 4.9377 2.8000e- 0.0289 0.0000 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.0000 1.0000e- + 0.0600 0.0600 1.7000e- .i 004 , , 004 , 004 , , 004 004 i i 004 0.0636 Energy 0.3406 3A959 2.6005 0.0186 T_ ___'_______'�------r------T•----.__y..._.._,_____�_T______T------' 0.2353 0.2353 0.2353 0.2353 1 3,715.046 3,715.046 0.0712 0.0681 3,737.655 2 2 i i 3 Mobile 3.4301 8.9354 35.5023 0.0670 4.3546 0.1220 , T-------'------ '-------'-------''------T-------- ------- 4.4766 1.1629 0.1121 1.2750 + 6,052.282 6,052.282 0.2464 6,057.456 + 88 , , + 9 Total8.7083 12.0315 1 38.1318 0.0856 4.3546 1 0.3574 4.7120 1.1629 , 0.3475 1.5104 9,767.388'9,767.388 1 0.3178 0.0681 ,9,795.175 9 9 9 1 7 Mitigated Operational Area 4.9377 2.8000e- 0.0289 0.0000 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- + , , , , i 004 ' ' ' , , , y 0.0600 0.0600 1.7000e- 0.0636 004 , 004 , , 004 , 004 � ' ' + ; ; 004 ; .,...----_- �T������T������1...������T.���� �����T������.r������T������-y------_-----_-T--_------ ��T�� T.---- Energy 0.3406 3.0959 2.6005 0.0186 0.2353 0.2353 3,715.046 3,715.046 0.0712 0.0681 3,737.655 , , 0.2353 0.2353 + , i 2 2 -- - - � 3 w������-T�����-T�����-T����-�7���----T------T------1�---- ----------------T------ -,-------T------T------T------T__ _ _ Mobile 3.4301 8.9354 35.5023 0.0670 4.3546 0.1220 4.4766 1.1629 0.1121 1.2750 1 6,052.282 6,052.282 0.2464 6,057.456 ' i 8 8 ' 9 Total F8.70183 12.0315 1 1-3-8.1318 1 0.0856 1 4.3546 1 0.3574 4.7120 , 1.1629 1 0.3475 1.5104 9.767.388 9,767.383 0.3178 1 0.0681 19,795.175 9 9 9 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase 1 :Grading :Grading :6/1/2014 i,6/9/2014 5' 6' ------------ ------------------i-----------------------I------------4------------4--------4---------- 2:BuildingConstruction :Building Construction X6/10/2014 4/13/2015 5' 220' ------- --------------- 3 :Paving I--------4 9 Paving 4/14/2015 :4l27/2015 5' 10' - 9 ----------------------4-------------------------Y-------— --------I 4 :Architectural Coatin :Architectural Coating ;4/28/2015 ;6/1/2015 5; 25, D 3 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 n Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 281,973; Non-Residential Outdoor: 93,991 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM Grading ;Excavators 1 8.00; 162: 0.38 Grading -•--- -- - =Graders---------------------F----------------1-------------i------------- -- • 1 8.001 174: Grading -• - --- iRubberTiredDozers------------F----------------I----------80-I------------ 041 0, 255: 0.40 -- -----------------------------------------------------t----------------- ------------ ---------------- -------------- Grading 0.37 ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 31 B.00 97: 0.37 ------------------•---------:---------------------------I-----------------i ----- ------------- Building Construction ;Cranes 1 i 7.00E y 226 0.29 -----------------------------:-------------------- N Building Construction :Forklifts ' 31 ---------8.00• -----------89, 0.20 --------------------------------------------------------H---------------- � ------------, ___ ---; -------------- Building Construction ;Generator Sets 11 8.00, - 84, 0.74 ----------------------------:---------------------------F--------- -i ------------ Building Construction ;Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 31 7.00E ____ ------ r 97: 0.37 Building Construction------------ = ---------------------t-----------------1i---------- - ------------- -H - :Welders 8.00: 46: 0.45 --------------------------:---------------------------I-----------------' --9 4- 0.56 Paving ;Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 2= 6.00 �� ----------- Paving ;Pavers I 1 r---- S.00F---���125---• 0.42 * Paving - - - ---- - --- =Paving Equipment -------------F---------------- -------------I----------- D ; , 2� 6.00; 130: 0.36 3 - - --- ----- ---------------------------F-----------------I -------- Paving •Rollers � --- -1--------------.-------------- 216.00,1 80: 0.38 ----------------------------1---------------------------� ------------ r g •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes F ; 97: 0.37 Pavin 11 8.00►-------------�-------------- -------------------------• -1--------------------------- -----------------4------------- -------------l.-------------- Architectural T 1 6.00} 0.48 Coating •Air Compressors Trips and VMT Grading ; 6 15.00: 6.00,1 0.00; 14.70, 6.901 20.00;LD-Mix HHDT Mix :HHDT B-•--- - i------------ --------- I----------4----------I--------------1----------I---------- uilding Construction ; 9: 79.00; 31.00,1 0.00; 14.701 6.90: 20.001LD-Mix sHDT Mix 'HHDT ---------------:--------------- --------- ---------� • I'----------I____.___ - E-----------I- a----------I--------------I____..-..-+ Paving 8� 20.00 0.00" 0.00, 14.70 6.90: 20.001LD_Mix HHDT Mix :HHDT --•-------------:---------------+---------- --------------------+------------ ----------t---------- ------------------------- I ------•--- Architectural Coating ; 1 16.00' 0.00' 0.00' 14.70' 6.90• 20.00'LD_Mix 'HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Clean Paved Roads CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 3.2 Grading -2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3,3675 0.0000 3.3675 + 0.0000 ' L 0.0000 •___---•'-------�-------i------�-------�-------�-------'•------ j ' , Off-Road •' 3.8669 41.0997 ' 26,7538 0,0298 ------ ------ ------ 2.3714 2.3714 2.1817 2.1817 + '- 3,162.426 3,162.426r 0.9345 T 3,182.051 6 6 8 Total 3.8689 41.0997 , 26.7538 0.0298 6.5523 1 2.3711 8.9238 3.3675 2.18175.5492 3,162.426 1 3,162.426, 0.9345 1 3,182.051 6 6 g D 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site T J Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Vendor 0.0679 0.6779 ;- -3.0783 _3.0783-------.-------.------ 0.7306 � 1.3000e- � 0.0377 0.0136 0.0513 0.0108 0.0125 0.0233 ± x133.0783 � 133.0783 ' 1.1600e- ' 133.1025 003 003 ., , -'--___---- ------- -------+------- ------- ------- -------r------�-------+-------T-------+"----"------- -------�-------'�-------T-_.__-- Worker 0.0808 0.0983 1.2780 ' 2.1000e- - 0.1677 ' 1.3900e- 0.1691 0.0445 ' 1.2700e 0.0457 + 187.1427 ' 187.1427 ' 0.0104 ---- 09 • 003 003 003 + i Total 0.1487 0.7761 2.0086 3.4000e- 1 0.2054 0.0150 0.2204 0.0552 0.0138 , 0.0690 320.2210 1 320.2210 1 0.0116 320.4635 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 3.2 Grading - 2014 Mitiqated Construction On-Site Fugitive Dust 2.5554 0.0000 2.5554 1.3133 0.0000 1.3133 ++ 0.0000 . 0.0000 ------------ ., . i Off-Road 3.8669 41.0997 26.7538 0.0298 2.3714 2.3714 2.1817 2.1817 ± 0.0000 3,162.426 3,162.426T 0.9345 r ?3,162.051 t 6 6 g i Total 3.8669 41.0997 26.7538 0.0298 2.5554 1 2.3714 4.9269 1.3133 1 2.1817 1 3.4951 0.0000 1 3,162.426'3,162.426 0.9345 3,182.051 6 6 g rr 3 rn Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0 rn 00 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. 0.0679 0.6779 0.7306 1.3000e- 0.0377 0.0136 0.0513 0.0108 0.0125 0.0233 + ------------------------------------ Vendor 3.0783 003 y 133.0783 133.0783 1.1600e 133.1025 ., . . . . . . 003 Worker 0.0808 0.0983 1.2780 2.1000e- 0.1677 1.3900e- 0.1691 0.0445 12700e- 0.0457 ± 187.1427 187.1427 0.0104 187.3609 • 003 003 003 y i Total 0.1487 0.7761 2.0086 3.4000e- 1 0.2054 0.0150 1 0.2204 1 0.0552 0.0138 1 0.0690 320.2210 ' 320.2210 0.0116 320.4635 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 3.3 Building Construction -2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Off-Road 3.8680 31.2537 18.9298 0.0268 2.2280 2.2280 2.0973 2.0973 + 2,709.196 2,709.196 0.6889 2,723.663 0 1 Total 3.8680 31.2537 18.9298 0.0268 2.228;72.2280, 2.0973 72.0973 2,709.196 2,709.1961 0.6889 2,723.663 9 9 0 IDID n Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 0 rn Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 n ., .. ...___.r____ _r_ _---r----__r������� ---_--T-_--_-r-_----r, -__---r -_-.r__--__-y----"""' ____ _' Vendor •• 0.3506 3.5025 3.7748 6.7300e- - 0.1948 0.0703 0.2650 0.0556 0.0646 0.1202 + x687.5709 687.5709 r5.9800e- - ?687.6965 003 ' L , ; 003 , r___--- -r-_-__-r- 8904 - ____.._ _ Worker 0.4254 0.5175 6.7306 0.0111 0.8830 7.3300e 0.8904 1 0.2342 6.6900e- 0.2409 985.6182 985.6182 0.0547 T 986.7675 • 003003 L i Total 0.7761 4.0199 10.5054 0.0178 1 1.0778 1 0.07761 1.1554 1 0.2898 1 0.0713 0.3611 1,673.189' 1,673.189 0.0607 1,674.464 2 2 0 CaIEEMod Version. CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 3.3 Building Construction -2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site Off-Road 3.8680 31.2537 ' 18.9298 0.0268 2.2280 2.2280 • 2.0973 2.0973 i 0.0000 2,709.196 2,709.196 0.6889 2,723.663 + 9 9 0 Total 3.8680 , 31.2537 ' 18.9298 0.0268 2.2280 1 2.2280 2.0973 2.0973 0.0000 '2,709.196'2,709.196' 0.6889 2,723.663 9 9 0 rt U 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site J ,x Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 a 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 .. , , •' 0.3506 ' 3.5025 ' 3.7748 ' 6.7300e- ' 0.1948 ' r----6 0.0646 0--------------------------------------102 1 : .98Oe �------- ------- Vendor 0.0703 0.2650 ' 0.0556 0.0646 0.1202 + 687.5709 ' 687.5709 ' S.9800e 687.6965 003 ' --------�--•�------- , 003 T ____y__--_--' , ______, ______ ______ Worker 0.4254 0.5175 ' 6.7306 0.0111 0.8830 • 7.3300e- ' 0.8904 0.2342 ' 6.6900e- ' 0.2409 i 985.6182 x985.6182 r 0.0547 r ?986.7675 • 003 003 + i Total 0.7761 4.0199 1 10.5054 0.0178 1.0778 1 0.0776 1.1554 0.2898 0.0713 0.3611 1,673.189, 1,673.189, 0.0607 1,674.464 2 2 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 3.3 Building Construction -2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Off-Road 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 + •2,689.577 2,689.577 0.6748 a '2,703.748 3 Total F65;1 30.0299 18.7"61 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 2,689.577'2,689.577• 0.6748 ,2,703.748 1 1 3 D 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 7 J Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ., , endor 0.2995 3.0675 • 3.3534 6.7500o- 0.1948 0.0538 0.2486 0.0556 • 0.0495 � 0.1051 l683.7323 • 683.7323 � 5.3900o- - • 683.8455 003 i .. 003 � Worker 0.3801 0.4612 6.0520 0.0111 0.8830 6.9000e- 0.8899 0.2342 6.3200e- 0.2405 i 956.8900 956.8900 0.0502 957.9433 003 003 Total 0.6796 3.5286 9.4054 0.0179 1.0778 0.0607 1.1385 0.2898 1 0.0558 0.3456 '1,640.622,1,640.622 1 0.0556 •1,641.788 2 2 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 3.3 Building Construction -2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site x Off-Road •• 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 1 0.0000 2,689.577 2,689.577 0.6748 2,703.748 i 1 1 3 f Total 3.6591 30.0299 1 18.7446 0.0268 1 2.1167 1 2.1167 , 1.9904 1.9904 0.0000 2,689.577 1 2,689.577' 0.6748 1 2,703.748 1 1 3 rt V 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site J V PHM..I,.g - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. --------------------------- --------------------------------___r______r______T_______y 0.0556 0.0495 0.1051 683.7323___.._.'---------------------------- -------• + , Vendor 0.2995 3.0675 3.3534 � 6.7500e- 0.1948 0.0538 � 0.2486 � � 683.7323 5.3900e- ?683.8455 003 i .• . r + . 003 --------------------.r______r.______r______r______r______r______r______ _______ ,_______r______�_ Worker 0.3801 0.4612 6.0520 0.0111 0.8830 6.9000e- 0.8899 0.2342 6.3200e- 0.2405 ± 956.8900 956.8900 0.0502 957.9433 003 003 i Total 0.6796 3.5286 ' 9.4054 0.0179 1 1.0778 1 0.0607 1.1385 0.2898 0.0558 0.3456 j 1 1,640.622' 1,640.622, 0.0556 1,641.788 2 2 8 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 21 Date: 2/26/201410:11 AM 3.4 Paving -2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Off-Road 1W601 - 20.3064 ' 12.6794 0.0186 1.2241 1.2241 1.1280 1.1280 + :1,921.309- 1,921.309: 0.5588 1,933.044 Pavin •� 0.3380 T-------y--- '--� g 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.2981 20.3064 12.6794 1 0.0186 1.2241 1.2241 1.1280 1.1280 '1,921.309 1,921.309 0.5588 1 ,1,933.044 1 1 6 D 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 7 J N Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i •� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -------------------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. Worker 0.0962 0.1168 : 1.5321 2.8100e- ' 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6000e- 0.0609 + 242.2506 242.2506 0.0127 242.5173 003 003 ' 003 1. Total 0.0962 0.1168 1.5321 2.81000- 1 0.2236 1.75009- 0.2253 0.0593 1.60009- ' 0.0609 242.2506 ' 242.2506 ' 0.0127 1 242.5173 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 14 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 3.4 Paving - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site Off-Road 1.9601 20.3064 12.6794 0.0186 1.2241 1.2241 1.1280 1.1280 0.0000 1,921.309' 1,921.309' 0.5588 '1,933.044 ., , -----------�--------- ------ , , i 0 p ' , 6 t-------r------r-------- -------- -------- ------r------T-----�-y-'_ _._,-------4-------4-------4-------T...'-. Paving 0.3380 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' ' 0.0000 0.0000 1 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 i J Total 2.2981 20.3064 12.6794 0.0186 1.2241 1.1241 1.1280 1.1280 0.0000 '1,921.309' 1,921.309' 0.5568 1,933.044 0 0 6 D 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site J P Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t ., y ' Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ., , , ., , , , 1 , Worker 0.0962 0.1168 1.5321 ' 2.81008- 0.2236 ' 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 ' 1.6000e- ' 0.0609 + 242.2506 ' 2422506 0.0127 r T 242.5173 003 003 003 y i Total 0.0962 1 0.1168 1.5321 1 2.81009- 1 0.2236 1.75000- ' 0.2253 0.0593 1.60000- 0.0609242.2506 ' 242.2506 0.0127 242.5173 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 15 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 3.5 Architectural Coating -2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Archit.Coating • 69.7037 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 1 i i , 1 0.0000 ' 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4066 2.5703 1.9018 ' 2.9700e ' 0.2209 0.2209 1 , + ------'�------` -------------T-- 0.2209 0.2209 x281.4481 ' 281.4481 ' 0.0367 003 , , , ± , , 282.2177 Total •, 70.1103 2.5703 1.9018 1 2.97000- 1 1 0.2209 1 0.2209 , 0.2209 1 0.2209 281.4481 281.4481 ' 0.0367 1 282,2177 003 v 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site j s Hauling 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 , I 1 .1 1 1 , 1 , .. , 1 1 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 , , '- ------ Vendor , , , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 •• 1 r______r______r______r______r______r______r______r.______ ___y-----..r______w______w______' 1 Worker 0.0770 ' 0.0934 ' 1.2257 ' 2.2500e- ' 0.1788 ' 1.4000e , , , a ''-----�T. ---- 0.1802 0.0474 1.28000 0.0487 + : 193.8005 ' 193.8005 ' 0.0102 194.0138 003 , 003 003 + l Total 0.0770 1 0.0934 1 1.2257 1 2.25000- 1 0.1788 1 1.40000- 1 0.1802 . 0.0474 1 1.28000- 1 0.0487 193.8005 1 193.8005 1 0.0102 1 1 1194.01381 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 16 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 3.5 Architectural Coating -2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site Archit.Coating •' 69.7037 ' ' ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i , 0.0000 0.0000 .. --_ _.,�------T------T------T------T------T------T------T------T------T--------------.- ' 1 1 , _ Off- •' 0.4066 2.5703 ' 1.9018 2.9700e- ' 0.2209 ' 0.2209 ' 1 , 1 ' ----------------------------- Road810. 0.2209 0.2209 0.0000 281.4481 ' 281.4481 ' 0.0367 ' 003 + , , 282.2177 A , t Total 70.1103 1 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.0000 281.4481 , 281.4481 ' 0.0367 282.2177 003 .=r fD 3 r) Mitigated Construction Off-Site _o J Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' ' 0.0000 y ., , , , , Vendor •' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 , , y '-------T------r---O0-�'-.------- - ' ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 y------------------------------- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T______-------- or e; 0.0770 0.0934 ' 1.2257 2.2500e- 0.1788 1.4000e- 0.1802 ' 0.0474 ' 1.2800e- ' 0.0487 y 193.8005 ' 193.8005 ' 0.0102 ' ' 194.0138 003 , 003 ; 003 ' j A ; Total 0.0770 0.0934 1.2257 2.2500e- ' 0.1788 1.40000- 0.1802 0.0474 1 1.28009- 0.0487 193.8005 193.8005 1 0.0102 1 1 194.0138 003 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 17 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Mitigated 3.4301 8.9354 1 35.5023 1 0.0670 1 4.3546 1 0.1220 1 4.4766 1.1629 0.1121 1 1.2750 + 1 6,052.282 6,052.282 1 0.2464 1 6,057.456 .� , 1 •� 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , 1 � , 8 , 8 � 1 9 T---_--T---__-_�_..._..r------T------- ------!--- Unmitigated 3.4301 8.9354 35.5023 0.0670 4.3546 1 0.1220 4.4766 1.1629 0.1121 1.2750 •6,052.282 6,052.282 0.--- ?----456 8 8 y 4.2 Trip Summary Information n v V V General Office Building• • ..... ---55_15 ---+ _ 55.15_ 177,664 _ 177,664 Hotel - -- - ----•-- ;- 786.24 1 786.24 t 786.24 1,876,103 1,876,103 ......................................i--------------I-----0.00----+------ --- Parking Lot • 0.00 --------------------------- - ""'"'"'- -- -- Total 841.39 841.39 841.39 2,053,767 2,053,767 4.3 Trip Type Information General Office Building 16.60 8.40 -- 6.90 33.00 1 48.00 1 19.00 77 19 4 •......................r-_-------- 1 •••••..••Hotel.••..•••• f---16.60-- 8.40 -_ 6.90 19.40 61.6019.00 58 38 4 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 � 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 � 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 0.474745• 0.065936' 0.172132• 0.156409• 0.055843• 0.009120• 0.016202• 0.038647• 0.001119• 0.001338• 0.004871• 0.000723• 0.002914 �•Q � fggpetail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy rD 3 NaturalGas 0.3406 3.0959 2.6005 0.0186 0.2353 0.2353 • 0.2353 0.2353 + :3.715.046-3.715.046: 0.0712 0.0681 •3,737.655 fl Mitigated ;; ; • i ; 2 2 1 3 NaturalGas 0.3406 3.0959 2.6005 0.0186 0.2353 0.2353 0.2353 0.2353 3,715.046•3,715.046• 0.0712 0.0681 •3,737.655 DO Unmitigated 2 2 3 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 5.2 Energy by Land Use -NaturalGas Unmitigated Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 : 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 __ General Office 50 +' 5.4000e- 4.9000e- ' 4.1200e- ' 3.000Oe- ' 3.7000e- 3.7000e ' + 5.8824 5.8824 ' 1.1000e 1.1000e 5.9182 t; 004 T3.7000e 3.7000e ui ding , 003 , 003 , 005 , , 004 004 004 004 t +. _----------------�--------------4---------------- -r------i---------------' + 4 004 00 , -------r-------+ Hotel 31527.9 t; 0.3400 3.0910 2.5964 0.0186 0.2349 0.2349 0.2349 0.2349 + '-------r------ ---___ '3,709.163 3,709.163' 0.07111 0.0680 ?3,731.737 +, t 8 8 2 Total 0.3406 , 3.0959 2.6005 0.0186 0.2353 0.2353 0.2353 0.2353 3,715.0461 3,715.0461 0.0712 0.0681 13,737.655 D 2 2 3 l 7 Mitigated Parking Lot 0 ±' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 t 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000' ______'-_"' - -----------------------------------r------r------r------•.-------r-------*------_' r, ' 1 , General Office 0.05 t' S.4000e ' 4.9000e 4.1200e ' 3.000Oe ' 3.7000e 3.7000e ' 3.7000e ' 3.7000e- t 5.8824 5.8824 r1.1000e-r1.1000e-r 5.9182 Building +, 004 ; 003 ; 003 ; 005 ; ; 004 ; 004 ; ; 004 ; 004 y +, ; 004 004 l ; Hotel 31.5279 i 0.3400 3.0910 2.5964 0.0186 0.2349 0.2349 0.2349 0.2349 t 3,709.163'3,709.163- 0.0711 r 0.0680 ?3,731.737 8 8 2 Total 0.3406 1 3.0959 2.6005 1 0.0186 1 0.2353 1 0.2353 1 0.2353 1 0.2353 3,715.04613,715.0461 0.0712 1 0.0681 13,737.655 2 2 3 6.0 Area Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 20 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Mitigated 4.9377 2.8000e- 0.0289 0.0000 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- i 0.0600 0.0600 1.7000e- 0.0636 •�- ; 004 ; 004 004 ; 004 y 004 -----T------T------T------ ------T------ �------ * ------T------T-------�--------------T 004 Unmitigated •• 4.9377 2.60009- 0.0289 0.0000 ------T------�------- -- -__ • 1.00009- 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0600 0.0600 1.7000e- ? 0.0636 . 004 004 004 004 004 004 ; r-r 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated 0 0 Architectural 1.1936 0.0000 0.0000 . i Coating 0.0000 0.0000 y 0.0000 0.0000 ----------- ------- ----- . i i + 1_______7__ y_______1_______1_______1__-____1___-__-7-____-_T-___-__� ------------------------------------ Consumer 3.7413 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 Products + 0.0000 . Landscaping •• 2.8600e- 2.8000e- 0.0289 • 0.0000 -------''----0 1.70OO -�-------� --- 1.00009- � 1.00009- � • 1.000Oe- � 1.00009- + 0.0600 � .0600 � 1.7000e- 0.0636 •, 003 004 004 004 004 004 + ± 004 Total 4.9377 2.80009- 0.0289 0.0000 1.0000e- ' 1.00009- 1 1.0000e- 1.00009- 0.0600 0.0600 1.7000x- ' 0.0636 004 004 004 004 004 t 04 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 21 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:11 AM 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated Architectural 1.1936 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + Coating r , , 1 0.0000 0.0000 .. , ----------- '-------r------4-------i-------r------ ' , y ' ' T-------T•------' T-------y.....-•,-------1-------T------�-------T....-. Consumer •� 3.7413 . , '------''------- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + Products � � y 0.0000 0.0000 .. , -------r .. ' ------r------r --------------- , ------ 1 r------T---------------,-------�---------------T. __ _ Landscaping 2.8600e- 2.8000e- 0.0289 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- ' 1.00OOe- ' 1.00OOe- + 0.0600 0.0600 1.7000e- 003 004 004 004 004 004 j 004 0.0636 J Total 4.9377 2.8000,9- 0.0289 0.0000 1.00000. 1.00006. ' 1.0000,8- 1.00OOe- 0.0600 1 0.0600 1 1.70000- ' 0.0636 N 004 004 004 004 004 004 0 7.0 Water Detail 00 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad 10.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM19474 San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage General Office Building 5.00 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 0 ----- ---- --- :------------------------------i------------------ i Parking Lot 143.00 - ----'1.29 ------- ' Space � 1.29 1,000.00 0 ---------------------- ---------------------- Hotel 126.00 ----� -------------- • Room 1.60 182,952.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics r+ Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 rn nClimate Zone 10 Operational Year 2015 00 Utility Company Southern California Edison N CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics- Land Use- 126 Room Hotel on 1.6 acres, 5,000 sq ft General Office Building, 143 space perking lot on 1.29 acre Construction Phase-Construction schedule provided by applicant. Trips and VMT-6 vendor trips added to the Grading Phase in order to account for water trucks Architectural Coating - Per SCAQMD Rule 1113 all interior architectural coatings will be limited to 50 grams VOC per liter. Vehicle Trips-Trip rates from Revised Trip Generation Analysis. Sequestration -A minimum of 140 new trees added to project site. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -Mitigation Measure 1 -Water all exposed areas 3x per day CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential Interior 250.00 i 50.00 ------------------------------ ..- tblConstructionPhase------ --------- um -'-- - -- - -----------------------------4--- - -a- •N Days 10.00 1 25.00 - --- tblLandUse•--------- -----------------------------anse are -----------------------------� ----'- 3- _ L dU Squ F t 57,200.00 1 1,000.00 ------------------------ ------------------------------ ' --- - ------------ ------------------tblLandUse LotAcreage 4.20 ------------1.6-0- ----------- ----------------------------- - _ •----- - ---_ ;_ -- - - }•------------------thiProjectCharacteristicsOperationaffear 2014 ------------i ----------- ----------- ----------------------------- 2015 tblSe uesUation NumberOfNewTrees 0.00 +---------- 140.00 i ----------- ----------------------------- -- -tblTripsAndVMT -----------------------------VendorTripNumber -----------------------------f----------- ,i- ----------------------------- --------- _ 0 00 6.00 tbNehicleTrips ; ..ST_TR� ------- - ----------------------------------------- - 2.37 1 11.03 ----------------- tbNehicleTrips -------------- ST_TR---- - ------------- .---------------t--------- • i ----------------------------- ' 8 19 .24 - tbNehicleTrips SU TR _''-""-" ' _ ; 0.98 i 11.03 --------------i-----s------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------ ---------- ----------- --- 5.95 � 6.24 _____ -- -- - _ m tbNehicleTrips -WD_TR • ------------11.01 ------------f 3 -----------------------------;----------- -----------------a-------------------------- i 11 03 r1 tbNehiGeTrips WD—TR 8.17 6.24 v w 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction 2014 4.6435 41.9022 28.9233 0.0436 6.7577 2.3866 9.1443 3.4227 2.1957 5.6184 i 0.0000 4,289.211 4,289.211 0.9461 0.0000 4,309.079 2 2 5 --------------------------------------------------------- -------- i +_-'-_._:----- ----------�--------------- ------- 2015 70.1828 33.6760 27.7355 0.0436 1.0778 2.1781 3.2559 0.2898 2.0468 2.3366 ± 0.0000 4,239.367 4,239.367 0.7305 0.0000 ?4,254.708 a 8 8 7 i Total F74.8263 1 75.5782 1 56.6589 1 0.0872 1 7.8355 1 4.5647 1 12.4002 1 3.7125 4.2425 7.9550 0.0000 '9,528.579 1 8,528.579 1 1.6766 0.0000 8,563.788 0 0 2 f 'D 3 Mitigated Construction �o P 2014 4.6435 41.9022 28.9233 0.0436 2.7608 2.3866 5.1474 1.3686 2.1957 3.5642 + 0.0000 4,289.211 4,289.211 0.9461 0.0000 4,309.079 .. i 2 ; 2 5 .. . 201570.1828 33.6760 27.7355 0.0436 1.0778 2.1781 3.2559 0.2898 2.0468 2.3366 ± 0.0000 4,239.367 4,239.367 0.7305 r 0.0000 T 4,254.708 t 8 8 7 i Total 74.8263 1 75.5782 1 56.6589 1 0.0872 1 3.8386 4.5647 1 8.4033 1.6583 1 4.24251 5.9008 0.0000 181528.57918,528.5791 1.6766 1 0.0000 18,563.788 0 0 2 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 51.01 OM 32.23 55.33 0.00 25.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Area 4.9377 2.8000e- 0.0289 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.000Oe- 1.00OOe- 1 0,0600 0.0600 , 004 004 004 004 004 + 1.7000e , 0.0636 ---- ------- , j , 004 -------�-------T-0.2353 -------- ---- _ , Energy 0.3406 3.0959 2.6005 0.0186 0.2353 0.2353 ' 0.2353 0.2353 + 3,715.046'3,715.046 r 0.0712 r 0.0681 T 3,737.655 , ---------- -------4------- ---- ---- y 2 3 , 2 ------- ------- -------�---------------T-------+-------�-------� Mobile •' 3.3332 9.3243 33.5239 0.0624 4.3546 ' 0.1230 4.4776 1.1629 ' 0.1130 • 1.2758 + -----'-------'-------T i 5,653.032' 5.653.032' 0.2467 5,658.212 y 3 3 Total 8.6114 ' 12.4204 ' 36.1534 0.0810 4.3546 0.3584 4.7129 1.1629 0.3484 1.5112 9,368.138 '9,368.138 0.3181 0.0681 '9,395.931 rD rr 5 5 3 3 n 0 00 Mitigated Operational Area 4.9377 2.8000e- 0.0289 ' 0.0000 ' 1.00OOe- ' 1.00OOe- ' 1.00OOe- ' 1.0000e + , , ' 004 004 + 0.0600 0.0600 1.7000e ' 0.0636 004 ' ' , , 004 , 004 { ; 004 , , , , , , , 1 Energy 0.3406 3.0959 2.6005 0.0186 0.2353 0.2353 ' 0.2353 0.2353 i 3,715.046'3,715.046 r 0.0712 0.0681 T 3,737.655 -----------%------- ------- ------- -------r------ ------r------�-------� ' ___ 3 ------T-------y-------�--------------'•-------+---- Mobile 3.3332 9.3243 33.5239 0.0624 4.3546 0.1230 4.4776 1.1629 0.1130 1.2758 ± 5,653.032'5,653.032' 0.2467 ?5,658.212 i 3 3 3 Total 8.6114 12.4204 36.1534 1 0.0810 1 4.3546 0.3584 ' 4.7129 1.1629 1 0.3484 1.5112 9,368.138 1 9,368.138 , 0.3181 ' 0.0681 9,395.931 5 5 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 5 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10.14 AM LIM Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase 1 :Grading :Grading 6/1/20146/9/2014 I 5' 6' ---%----9 ---- -- --i-----------------------I-------- 4-------- 4--------4--------- 2 :Building Construction Construction •Building Construction 16/10/2014 4/13/2015 ' 5' 220' %---- i ---- :Paving :Paving 4l14/2015 '4/27/2015 S' 10' 4-------%-------------- ---------I-----------------------4--------------------------I---------1------------------------------ :Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating '4/28/2015 6/1/2015 5• 25• rD n Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 0 rn Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 281,973; Non-Residential Outdoor: 93,991 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM Grading Excavators 1 8.00- 162 0.38 ---- -- - - ------ -i---------------------------I----------------- ----------- � _ Grading :Graders 1 0 F ---�-174: -- -- - - - - --------------i--------------------- -F --- -------------- ---------------- 80 041 Grading :Rubber Tired Dozers - 1 8.00F� — 255- Grading -- ------ --- :Tractors/Loaders/Backhces-------F ------3�----------80-F-------97 -------------- 0 40 00.37 ----------------------------t---------------------------I-----------------� , Building Construction :Cranes 11 --7.00 F� 226 Building Construction ------- --F - 0.29 -------- 8.001 89� 0.20 Building Construction- =Generator Sets----------------F--_------------� I---------- -'�-'-'-'----' .• 1 8.00- 84: _ -------------------------------------•------------------F---------------- � ' 0 74 Building Construction *Tractors/Loaders/Backhces 1 3 - 7.00F� 7 uiling Construction ;Welders 11 ----------8.00 F----------46 ----------- -------- 0.45 ----------------- ---------------------------F Paving :Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 0~---- g;----------- ----------------------------i---------------------------F---------------- Paving •Pavers 1 �_ 6 0 �__�-------;.-------------- Paving -- .- 0 56 -- - - -- ---- - -------------------------- ' 1, 8.-- 125 0.42 rr Paving ;Paving Equipment 2�--------- 6.00 F---M------ ------- --- - rp , , 130, 0.36 g - - -- =Rollers ---------------------t----------------- 3 Paving 2t--------- 6.00F----------80 ---------- 0.38 n ------------------ ---:--------------- I I ------------t----------------- -- p Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhces 1 8.001 - --- 97 0.37 00 ---------------------------t---------------------------4----------------' ------------ -------------I.-------------- Architectural Coating -Air Compressors 6 00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT Grading 6 15.00 6.00 0.00: 14.70; 6.90,1 20.00;LD_Mix @HDT Mix IHHDT - - ------------i---------------F----------t----------a---------- E_-_________I_-__------4__________1______________I__-____-_-I.___------ Building Construction 9� 79.00: 31.00 0.00, 14.70 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT Mix IHHDT ------------------------------- --------- I----------a----------I--------------I----------1---------- F----------t--- --- -- - 1----------- Paving 8: 20.00: 0.001 0.00. 14.701 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix �HDT Mix i HHDT - -_- _----. I---------------�---------f-----------I--------4-----------4----------I---------4------------4---------I- Architectural Coating 1• 16.00• 0.00• 0.00• 14.70• 6.90• 20.00•LD-Mix •HDT_Mix •HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Clean Paved Roads CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 3.2 Grading -2014 Unmitigated Construction On Site Fugitive Dust 1 1 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 1 0.0000 1 1 0.0000 55555555---., 1 ; Off-Road •' 3.8669 � 41.0997 � 26.7538 � 0.0298 1 � 2.3714 � 2.3714 1 2.1817 T_ - ....... -..---r------'-5555--'-5555-' 2.1817 ± '3,162.426 1 3,162.426 0.9345 r 1 3,182.051 ' + 6 ' 6 8 Total •' 3.8669 41.0997 26.7538 0.0298 6.5523 2.3714 8.9238 3.3675 2.1817 5.5492 3,162.426,3,162.426, 0.9345 '3,182.051 6 6 8 h r0 3 n 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site w co Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 + , , 1 1 , 4 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 Vendor 0.0723 0.6974 0.8136 1.2900e- 0.0377 1 0.0138 1 0.0515 1 0.0108 0.0127 0.0234 1 1 131.9711 131.9711 1 1.1900e- 1 131.9961 • 1 , 003 ' ' ' .. , 1 1 y , 003 --.._ -...r____ __--_____...___--_r-_____r_-____r��___�r__�___r��__�-_r----.-.' ' 1 , Worker 0.0763 0.1051 1.0993 1 1.91008- 0.1677 1.39008- 0.1691 0.0445 1 i ;---5373'-555 373;5555---�------�--- '-" 1 003 ; ' 003 , , 1.27008 0.0457 + 170.5373 170.5373 0.0104 1 170.7556 1 , 003 Total •, 0.1486 0.8025 1.9130 3.2000e- 0.2054 0.0152 0.2205 1 0.0552 0.0139 1 0.0692 302.5085 ' 302.5085 1 0.0116 , 302.7516 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 8 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 3.2 Grading -2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site Fugitive Dust 2.5554 0.0000 2.5554 1.3133 ' 0.0000 1.3133 + •• ' � y 0.0000 0 0000 ---- -----�-------� , + 1_______T-__-___T______T______r_-_-_-T--_-__7----__-T--------------y _ ----' , Off-Road 3.8669 41.0997 26.7538 ' 0.0298 2.3714 2.3714 . , ------ '------- ------- 2.1817 2.1817 ± 0.0000 •3,162.426' 3,162.426 0.9345 '3,182.051 i A 6 6 g Total 3.8669 41.0997 26.7538 1 0.0298 2.5554 1 2.3714 4.9269 1.3133 2.1817 3.4951 0.0000 3,162.426 1 3,162.426 0.9345 '3,182.051 1 11 6 6 g r+ fD 3 n Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0 60, Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 , . y Vendor 0.0723 0.6974 ' 0.8136 1.2900e- 0.0377 0.0138 0.0515 0.0108 ' 0.0127 0.0234 y r ',- T ., , 131.9711 131.9711 1.1900e 131.9961 003 ' . , y .• ____ T y OD3 ..._..' _-__--1-___-_-4-------T_...___ Worker 0.0763 • 0.1051 ' 1.0993 1.9100e ' 0.1677 1.3900e- ' 0.1691 0.0445 r1.2700e ' 0.0457 ± 170.5373 ' 170.5373 ' 0.0104 170.7556 003 003 003 y 1 Total 0.1486 0.8025 1.9130 3.20009- 0.2054 I 0.0152 0.2205 0.0552 0.0139 0.0692 302.5085 ' 302.5085 ' 0.0116 302.7516 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 3.3 Building Construction -2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site OH-Road 3.8680 31.2537 18.9298 0.0268 2.2280 2.2280 2.0973 2.0973 ± 2,709.196'2,709.196- 0.6889 -2,723.66 i 9 9 ' 0 i Total3.8680 1 31.2537 1 18.9298 0.0268 1 2.2280 1 2.2280 1 2.0973 1 2.0973 2,709.196 1r2,709.196 1 0.6889 '2,723.663 9 9 0 rt D 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site a D Hauling 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _ .. _ i Vendor 0.3736 ' 3.6032 4.2038 ' 6.6800e- 0.1948 0.0712 0.2660 0.0556 0.0655 0.1211 + 681.8509 ' 681.8509 ' 6.1300e- 681.9797 .. i 003 ± 003 .._.___.... _______r------T_------T_------r------T_------r------T_______T_______- ----...' 1 1 orker 0.4019 0.5538 5.7897 0.0101 ' 0.8830 ' 7.3300e- ' 0.8904 0.2342 ' 6.6900e- ' 0.2409 + 898.1633 ' 898.1633 ' 0.0547 899.3126 • 003 003 i Total 0.7756 1 4.1569 9.9935 0.0167 1.0778 1 0.0781 1.1563 , 0.2898 , 0.0722 0.3620 1,580.014' 1,580.014' 0.0609 , 1,581.292 2 2 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 3.3 Building Construction -2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site (?4 Off-Road 3.8680 31.2537 18.9298 0.0268 2.2280 2.2280 2.0973 2.0973 + 0.0000 '2,709.196 2,709.196' 0.6889 '2,723.663 + 9 9 0 Total 3.8680 ' 31.2537 18.9298 1 0.0268 1 2.2280 2.2280 1 2.0973 2.0973 0.0000 2,709.196,2,709.196' 0.6889 2,723.663 9 9 0 D 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 7 0 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3736 3.6032 4.2038 ' 6.6800e- 0.1948 0.0712 0.2660 0.0556 0.0655 0.1211 + 681.8509 681.8509 6.1300e- 681.9797 003 + ; 003 ; Worker 0.4019 ' 0.5538 ' 5.7897 0.0101 ' 0.8830 ' 7.3300e• ' 0.8904 ' 0.2342 ' 6.6900e- ' 0.2409 ± x898.1633 x898.1633 ' 0.0547 899.3126 003 003 + Total 0.7756 4.1569 1 9.9935 1 0.0167 1.0778 0.0785 1.1563 0.2898 0.0722 t 0.3620 1,580.014' 1,580.014 j 0.0609 1,581.292 2 2 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 11 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 3.3 Building Construction -2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Oft-Road 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 + 2,689.577 2,689.577 0.6748 2,703.748 3 Total •' 3.6581 30.0299 18.7446 1 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 2,689.577 2,688.577, 0.6748 ,2,703.748 1 1 3 D Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 7 - c J Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. Vendor 0.3187 3.1529 3.8009 6.7000e- 0.1948 0.0545 0.2492 - 0.0556 0.0501 0.1057 j 678.0272 5.5400e- 678.1436 003 .. , , , , , , , , 678.0272 , , , , , , 003 ....._.... ____��r____�_r_��__ T .r------r------r------r---_--r-------y.......,�-_---_r----_-w--_---r------.-..---- Worker 0.3581 0.4931 5.1901 0.0101 0.8830 6.9000e- 0.8899 0.2342 6.3200e- 0.2405 + 871.7635 871.7635 0.0502 872.8168 003 ; ' 003 l Total 0.6768 3.6460 8.9910 0.0166 1.0778 0.0614 1.1392 0.2896 0.0564 0.3462 1,549.790,1,549.790, 0.0557 '1,550.960 7 7 4 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 12 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 3.3 Building Construction - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site Off-Road 3.6591 30.0299 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1.9904 + 0.0000 2,689.577 2,689.577 0.6748 2,703.748 f 1 1 3 Total 3.6591 ' 30.0299 ' 18.7446 0.0268 2.1167 2.1167 1.9904 1 1,9904 0.0000 '2,689.577 1 2,689.577 0.6748 12,703.748 1 1 3 r+ N 3 n Mitigated Construction Off-Site 0 w Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ., , , , , , , , , , 1 T-------+----- ----�-------�------- -----Vendor 0.3187 3.1529 3.8009 6.7000e- 0.1948 0.0545 0.2492 0.0556 0.0501 0.1057 1678.0272 678.0272 5.5400e- 678.1436 003 , , , , , 003 , Worker 0.3581 0.4931 5.1901 0.0101 0.8830 6.9000e- 0.8899 0.2342 6.3200e- 0.2405 i 871.7635 871.7635 0.0502---------- -872.8168 003 003 y i Total 0.6768 3.6460 8.9910 0.0168 1 1.0778 0.0614 1 1.1392 0.2898 0.0564 0.3462 1 1,549.790, 1,549.790' 0.0557 1,550.960 7 7 4 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 13 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 3.4 Paving -2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Off-Road 1.9601 20.3064 12.6794 0.0186 1.2241 1.2241 1.1280 1.1280 + 1,921.309 1,921.309 0.5588 •, , , , , i i i 1 i 1 , ! ;1,933.044 6 ------- _ •,----8o-7------1-------T------7-------1-------\-------' , , ---- -------•�------ ,-------�-------'•-------� Paving •� 0.3380 0.0000 0.0000 T-- , - -- '---------_----- 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 Total 2.2981 1 20.3064 j 12.6794 0.01861.2241 F1.2241 1.1280 1.1280 '1,921.309,1,921.308' 0.5588 1,933.044 1 1 6 D 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 7 a P Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 , , , , , 0.0000 � � , Vendor •� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 j.. .r 0.0000 r 1 .. � 0.0000 , , , , �-------+-------'r � , , , , , , + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ............. , , i Worker 0.0907 0.1248 1.3139 2.5600e- 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6000e- 0.0609 j 220.6996 220.6996 0.0127 220.9663 003 003 ; ; 003 j j Total 0.0907 0.1248 1.3139 1 2.5600e- 1 0.2236 1.7500x- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6000x- ' 0.0609 220.6996 220.6996 1 0.0127 220.9663 003 003 003 ,_+ rD 3 n 0 rn CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2015 unmitigated Construction On -Site Archit. Coating 69.7037 --T------r --7 Off -Road 0.4066 r 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- • , 003 Page 15 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.0000 0.0000 r 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 + 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 r__ -__-T 282.2177 TotalII 70.1103 I 2.5703 I 1.9018 1 2.9003 e- 0.2209 0.2209 , Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 0.2209 I 0.2209 1281.4481 1 281.4481 1 0.0367 282.2177 .+ V 3 '1 .o J CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2015 Mitigated Construction On -Site Archit. Coating 69.7037 -------------------- - - - --------- - - - - - - Off -Road 0.4066 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 Total 70.1103 ' 2.5703 P.9018 1 2.97009- 1 003 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 16 of 21 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.2209 r 0.2209 0.2209 1 0.2209 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 --------T-------y----------------------r------- 0.2209 0.2209 i 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 ? 282.2177 } 0.2209 I 0.2209 ' 0.0000 1281.4481 1281.4481 1 0.0367 1 1 282.2177 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile rt m 3 n b �o 00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Page 17 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM Mitigated 3.3332 9.3243 33.5239 0.0624 4.3546 0.1230 4.4776 1.1629 0.1130 1.2758 + ' , 5653032 5653 + • ,.• ,.032 • 0.2467 • 5,658.212 + 3 3 i 3 ----------- •'----_-T------T------------ T------ T------ +------ T------ ------T- t --_--_� _-----r------T--------------T--- Unmitigated 3.3332 9.3243 33.5239 0.0624 4.3546 0.1230 4.4776 1.1629 0.1130 1.2758 • 5,653.032 • 5,653.032 • 0.2467 ? 5,658.212 3 3 3 4.2 Trip Summary Information ...................................... General Office Building 55.15 55.15 i ----------................;.__.._.. 55.15 177,664 177,664 Hotel .....................................i-7777--7777 Lot • 786.24 • 786.2478624 F-7777--7777}- •78624 -7,664 1,876,103 --------------------------------------------------- 1,876,103 0.00 � 0.00 � 0.00 Total - Total 841.39 841.39 841.39 2,053,767 1 2,053,767 4.3 Trip Type Information • • • General Office Building • - 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 • 48.00 19.00 ; 77 19 4 •_-_-_-__--�_---__---•,______•___ +----_--- • r--------- --••----------=----------=-�r------------------------ Hotel58 38 4 • • ; 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 i 19.00 ; ......... ........�.-------•-------------------- _-------- ------------- - -- •77.77 7777-• 7777- •-- -- -- - ParkingLot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 18 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 0.474745• 0.065936' 0.172132' 0.156409• 0.055843' 0.009120' 0.016202: 0.038647: 0.001119' 0.001338' 0.004871' 0.000723' 0.002914 Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 7* rD 3 NaturalGas 0.3406 3.0959 2.6005 0.0186 n Mitigated •' 0.2353 0.2353 0.2353 0.2353 i , 3,715.046 3,715.046 • 0.0712 0.0681 ' 3,737.655 •� a 3 NaturalGas 0.3406 3.0959 2.6005 0.0186 T 0.2353 T 0.2353 T Unmitigated 0.2353 0.2353 - 3,715.046 3,715.046- 0.0712 - 0.0681 ? 3,737.655 _ _ 2 2 3 r rD 3 n 0 N O O CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Page 19 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM Mitigated 6.0 Area Detail 3 n v N O CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Page 20 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM Mitigated •• 4.9377 2.8000o- 0.0289 0.0000 ' ' 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.0000o- 1.00000- i 004 ' , i 004 004 i i 004 ; 004 0.0600 0.0600 1.7000o- 0.0636 _ _ _ _ _ --•P------T------1•------T------T--_--- ' ' ' + • i 004 Unmitigated 4.9377 2.8000e- 0.0289 0.0000 T------T--000e- -----T • 1.000Oo- 1,000Oo- 1 ----- ' T 1.000Oe- • -_--Oe- 1.000Oo- """-�- _ ------ T T '•' -' - -' - � " " " " " 004 004 004 004 004 .0600 .0600 0.0600 0.0600 1.70000 0.0636 ' 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ;+ rD 3 n 0 N O N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated Page 21 of 21 Date: 2/26/2014 10:14 AM 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad 10.0 Vegetation APPENDIX B CaIEEMod Model Annual Printouts SUBTPM19474 DKNHotels Project, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Appendix B City of Rancho Cucamonga Item C.D203 3 n 0 N 0 A CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Page 1 of 27 Rancho Cucamonga SUBTPM19474 San Bernardino -South Coast County, Annual Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM General Office Building 5.00 1000sgft 0.11 5,000.00 11 p Parking Lot-. _.. 143.00 -...; -•--------------------------------- ------ - ---- ------- ----- Space 1.29 1,000.00 11 0 ------------------------------ a------------------------------ 4� ----------------------------------------- r ------------- Hotel 126.00 Room 1.60 182,952.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2015 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 630.89 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - 126 Room Hotel on 1.6 acres, 5,000 sq ft General Office Building, 143 space perking lot on 1.29 acre Construction Phase - Construction schedule provided by applicant. Trips and VMT - 6 vendor trips added to the Grading Phase in order to account for water trucks Architectural Coating - Per SCAQMD Rule 1113 all interior architectural coatings will be limited to 50 grams VOC per liter. Vehicle Trips - Trip rates from Revised Trip Generation Analysis. Sequestration - A minimum of 140 new trees added to project site. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Mitigation Measure 1 - Water all exposed areas 3x per day m 3 n 0 N O CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM tblArchitecturalCoating EF—Nonresidential—Interior 250.00 i 50.00 ----------- s----onPh---------; tblCo -----------------------------------------------------t---------- N Days ---------- ----------------------------- 10.00 1 4 ---------------------;- --------tblLandUse --------------------- ------- 25.00 ndUseSquare eet 57,200.00 --------- 1,0 00.00 -----------------------------4 --.--_ -------------- ---------------------—tblLandUse - tblProjectCharacteristics - - -_- • LotAcreage - pperationalYear - - - _ - - t-------------------------- 4.20 ----------------------------- - - . - 1.60 _ - - - - - 2014 �- - - - - - - - - - - 2015 -----------------------------4----------------------- tblSequestration NumberOlNewTrees 'i-----------------------4 - - . " - _ - . - - _ - - - - - - - - - - -----------------------------+----------------------------- tblTrisAndVMT P VendorTripNumber 0 00 ; a ------------------- ------------ ----------- 140 00 - ----------- --•------------------------ -_ tblVehicleTrips ------------- ---------------- 0.00 i -----------------------------t-------------------------- 6.00 ST_TR 2.37 i 11.03 - tblVehideTrips --------------... -------- -----------------------------4--'-------- • ST_ i 8 196.24 --'------- -----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ SU TR -----------------------------�-------------------------- _ 0.98 t 11.03 ---------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ' ------------------------------ SU TR -----------------------------4-------------------------- tblVehicleTrips • — --------wD_TR---------------------------------------- 5.95 i ----- 6.24 -•-- --- --- -- • 11.01 1 11.03 ----------------------------- tblVehideTrips +--------- -------------------------- WD _TR 8.17 6.24 2.0 Emissions Summary rr 3 n 0 N O 0) CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Page 3 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 2014 0.3518 2.7350 2.2358 3.3200o- 0.0980 0.1767 ' 0.2747 0.0312 0.1660 0.1972 0.0000 .. , 2015 003 ±- -------r------r------- - - - - - - ' 1.0467 1.3677 1.1305 ' 1.7700e- ' 0.0419 0.0884 0.1303 0.0113 0.0831 y 0.0944 ± 1 296.5766 ' 296.5766 0.0526 0.0000 297.6803 Total 1.3986 4.1027 3.3664 5.09009- 1 0.1279 1 0.2651 0.3930 0.0363 0.2491 i 0.2854 0.0000 20151.0468 1.3677 1.1305 ' 1.77009 0.0419 0.0884 0.1303 r 0.0113 r 0.0831 r r • 003 ' � 0.0944 ± 0.0000 155.8857 ' 155.8857 0.0273 0.0000-T 156.4592 1 y Total j .3986 4.1027 3.3664 5.0900e- 0.1399 0.2651 0.4050 0.0425 0.2491 0.2916 y 0.0000 ' ' 1 003 452.4623 452.4623 0.0799 0.0000 454.1396 Mitigated Construction 2014 0.3518 2.7350 2.2358 3.3200o- 0.0860 ' , 0.1767 ' 0.2627 ; 0.0250 ' 0.1660 ' 0.1911 0.0000 ' , , 003 , ' ' 1 296.5764 ' 296.5764 ' 0.0526 0.0000 ' 297.6801 , .. , 2015 - - - - - - ---- --------T------ ±- -------r------r------- - - - - - - 1.0467 1.3677 1.1305 ' 1.7700e- ' 0.0419 0.0884 0.1303 0.0113 0.0831 y 0.0944 ± - - - - - - -•-------w 0.0000 155.8856 ' 155.8856 r 0.0273 r ? 003 y 0.0000 156.4591 Total 1.3986 4.1027 3.3664 5.09009- 1 0.1279 1 0.2651 0.3930 0.0363 0.2491 i 0.2854 0.0000 452.4620 452.4620 1 0.0799 0.0000 003 454.1392 PercentI 0.00 I "0 I 0.00 I 0.00 8.58 0.00 2.96 14.52 0.00 2.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3 n N O V CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Page 4 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM Area 0.9010 4.000Oe- 3.6200e- 0.0000 ' 1.0000e- 1.00OOo- 1.00OO8- 1.00OOo- 0.0000 •�------- 005 ; 003 ; ' 005 005 05 + 6.8000o- • 6.8000e- 2.00OOo- 0.0000 ' 7.2100e- T------7-------T------1---_---T------' ' ' 005 , 003 003 005 003 Energy 0.0622 0.5650 0.4746 3.3900e 0.0429 __ '- ----'-------'--'----r-------+ 0.0429 - - - - - - -__ •' � ; 003 , � � 0.0429 0.0429 1 , 0.0000 1,691.846 1.691.846T 0.0613 0 0215 1699.8 04 ., -----------�-------�-------�------- , , g 9 Mobile 0.5813 1.7332 6.2872 0.0115 0.7777 0.0223 � ------ 0.7999 T ------ ------------- + T 0.2080 T - " " - - --'-------+- T 1 .. 0.0205 0.2284 + 0.0000 943.2494 943.2494 r , 0.0407 0.0000 ? 944.1031 -----------•- - - -- -- --------------�---------------------- , Waste., .---------------------- * , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i - - -�----------------------------- 14.9462 0.0000 ' 14.9462 0.8833 0.0000 33.4955 Water- -------+-------� ------'----- ' + T T - 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 1 1.2959 r------ ------ 18.0818 r 19.3777 r ------'-------� 0.1339 3.3100e- "' 23.2180 Total 1.5445 2.2983 6.7654 0.0149 0.7777 0.0652 0.8429 0.2080 0.0634 + i 0.2714 16.2422 ' ' 003 2,653.184 2,669.427 1.1192 0.0248 2,700.627 9 0 9 frtD n N O 00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational Page 5 of 27 Area 0.9010 4.000Oe- 3.62000- 0.0000 .. , 1.000Oe- 1.000Oo- 1.000Oo- 1.000Oo- - - - - - - - - - ., - - 005 003 -------7-------T------T------7-------7-------7-------T-------7-------T----- , , 005 005 , 005 ; 005 Energy 0.0622 0.5650 0.4746 3.3909 - 0.0429 0.0429 0.0429 -. 0.0429 003 ---------- Mobile , -------7-------7-------7-------T------7-------1-------7-------T-------T-- 0.5813 1.7332 6.2872 0.0115 ' , 0.7777 ' 0.0223 0.7999 , 0.2080 0.0205 ----• 0.2284 • Waste _ - -------T------T------T------1-------T--------------7-------1-------T------- , , 0.0000 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 V -a - Water -----------------------''' ------1-------1----------------------------' ., , T------. , , , 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 Total 'I 1.544S I 2.2983 1 6.7654 0.0149 1 0.7777 1 0.0652 1 0.8429 1 0.2080 1 0.0634 1 0.2714 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 0.0000 6.8000e- 6.8000o- ' 2.000Oe- 0.0000 7.2100e- 003 ; 003 ' 005 ; 003 --7-------7-------4--------------- 0.0000 -------------0.0000 1,691.846 1,691.846 0.0613 0.0215 1,699.804 9 ; 9' , � , 1 . _,...------7-------7-------7-------T 0.0000 943.2494 943.2494 0.0407 0.0000 ' 944.1031 , 14.9462 0.0000 14.9462 ' 0.8833 0.0000 33.4955 1.2959 18.0818 ' 19.3777 0.1339 3.3100o- 23.2159 003 16.2422 , 2,653.184 2,669.427 1 1.1192 1 0.0248 , 2,700.625 9 0 8 PercentI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 2.3 Vegetation Vegetation 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Page 6 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 1 :Grading ;Grading 6/1/2014�6/9l2014 i 5' 6' s----------------------------------------------I------------a-------------------- 4--------t. __________ 2 :Building Construction •Building Construction -6/10/2014 '4/13/2015 ' 5' 220' •� II ------------ a ------------ {-------- 4--------t :Paving :Paving 4/14/2015 4/27/2015 5; 10: ------- %-----------------------%----------------------- }-----------4 ------------- 1 --------- --------- % :Architectural Coating:Architectural Coating :4/2812015 ;6/1/2015 5; 25: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 3 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 281,973; Non -Residential Outdoor: 93,991 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment n b N_ O CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 7 of 27 uraam9 • Excavators 1 -----9 ----------------------=Graders---------------------F---------------- Gradin 8.00--F 174: 0.41 ------------- F------ ------r-------------- � 1 ----------------------------i---------- Grading *Rubber Tired Dozers 8.00 : 97 : 0.37 i 1 -- ------------------------- Grading i --------------- •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.29 -------------F---------- ------------------ 3 --------------------------------------------------------F---------------- Building Construction ------------- - - 8.00 , 84,1 :Cranes 1 --------------------------- Building Construction i --------------------------- •Forklifts F---------------- ------------- F------------ 4-------------- 3 --------------------------- Building Construction Sets -- - 6.00 9 '9'.- :Generator 1 ----------------------------i---------------------------F---------------- Building Construction •Tract ors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.42 ------------ -------------- 3 --------------------------------------------------------F------------------ Building Construction -------------F-----------4-------------- 6.006 80: :Welders I 1 ---------------------------- Paving ----------------------------F- •Cement Mortar ----------------- .------------ }.------------- and Mixers I 2 ---------------------------=Pavers Paving --------------------------- ----------------- --------------------------- Paving ---------------------------F-------- *Paving Equipment 1 2 ---- -----------------------=Rollers Paving --------------------------- ----------------- 2 ----------------------------s--------------------- 9 •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ----------------------------=..-------------------------------------------- 1 Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 Trips and VMT Limaing 6i 15.00: 6.0( --------------------------------I-----------i---------- Building Construction 9- 79.00: 31.0( ----------------i--------------- ----------;----- Paving 8 20.00: 0.0( ---------------- krchitectural Coating 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Clean Paved Roads Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 8.00: 162 : 0.38 ----------------------.-------------- 8.00--F 174: 0.41 ------------- F------ ------r-------------- 8.00- 255,- 0.40 ------------- F-- ---- -------------------- 8.00 : 97 : 0.37 -------------F------------- -------------- 7.00 - 226: 0.29 -------------F---------- ------------------ 8.00: gg 0.20 ------------- - - 8.00 , 84,1 0.74 -------------F ------ ------4-------------- 7.00 , 97' 0.37 ------------- F------------ 4-------------- 8.00 , 46: 0.45 -------F------------4- ------------------------------ - -- - 6.00 9 '9'.- 0.56 ------------- ----------- 8.00 1 125: 0.42 ------------ -------------- 6.001 6.001 130 : 0.36 -------------F-----------4-------------- 6.006 80: 0.38 --------- F------------11-------------- 8.00 - 97 : 0.37 .------------ }.------------- -------------- 6.00 - 78- 0.00- 14.701 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix �HDT_Mix �HHDT --------------------I----------4----------1--------------I----------4--------- 0.00- 14.70 6.90: 20.00oLD_Mix :HDT_Mix IHHDT ---------F-----------I---------- 4 ---------- 1 -------------- I ----------- --------- 0.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.00,LID _Mix 1HDT_Mix :HHDT -r-------------+----------I---------- 16.00: 0.00: 0.00 14.70; 6.90, 20.00:LD Mix :HDT_Mix HHDT rt D 3 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.2 Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-site Page 8 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM Fugitive Dust 0.0197 0.0000 0.0197 0.0101 0.0000 0.0101 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 00'f -Road --�------- Off -Road 0.0116 -------� ' T"------�-------r------T"------�-------r-0000-w------�-------y 0.1233 0.0803 9.000 0e- ' ' ' 7.1100e- 7.1100e- 6.5500e- 6.5500e- -' . ' .. "r r ' r2.5400c • 005 003 003 + 0.0000 ,--0000-� 8.6067 8.6067 0.0000 8.6601 ' 1 003 003 t 003 Total 0.0116 0.1233 0.0803 9.0000e- 0.0197 7.1100e- 1 0.0268 0.0101 6.5500e- ' i 0.0167 0.0000 I 8.6067 8.6067 1 005 003 003 2.5400e- 0.0000 8.6601 003 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site 3 n 0 N_ N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.2 Grading - 2014 Mitigated Construction On -Site Page 9 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM Fugitive Dust 7.6700e- 0.0000 7.6700e- 3.9400e- 0.0000 3.9400e 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .. , • ; 003 , ; 003 ; 003 003 l Off -Road 0.0116 0.1233 0.0803 9.0000e- r ------r------'- ------ '-------T-------~ - - - - - - -�- �-------------------- 7.1100o- 7.1100o- 6.SSOOe- 6.5500e- + 0.0000 8.6067 8.6067 2.5400e- r 0.0000 T 8.6601 •; 005 003 003 003 003 ± 003 i Total 0.0116 0.1233 0.0803 9.00009- 7.6700e- 7.1100e- 0.0148 3.9400e. 1 6.5500e. 0.0105 0.0000 8.6067 8.6067 2.54009- 0.0000 1 8.6601 005 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction Off -Site CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.3 Building Construction - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Off -Road 0.2843 2.2972 -1.3913 1.9700e- 003 Total 0.2843 2.2972 1.3913 1 1.9700e- ' 003 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 10 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 0.1638 0.1638 0.1542 0.1542 1 0.0000 180.6441 180.6441 0.0459 0.0000 - 181.6086 0.1638 0.1638 1 0.1542 0.1542 0.0000 180.6441 t 180.6441 0.0459 ' 0.0000 181.6086 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod2013.2.2 3.3 Building Construction - 2014 Mitigated Construction On -Site Off -Road 0.2843 2.2971 1.3913 1.9700e 003 Total 0.2843 ' 2.2971 1.3913 1.9700e- ' 003 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 0.1638 0.1638 0.1638 1 0.1638 Page 11 of 27 0.1542 0.1542 0.1542 1 0.1542 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 0.0000 180.6438 180.6438 0.0459 0.0000 181.6084 0.0000 180.6438 1 180.6438 0.0459 1 0.0000 181.6084 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.3 Building Construction - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Off -Road 0.1336 1.0961 0.6842 9.8000e 004 Total 0.1336 1.0961 , 0.6842 9.80000- ' 004 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 12 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 0.0773 0.0773 0.0727 0.0727 1 0.0000 89.0579 89.0579 0.0223 0.0000 89.5272 i a i 0.0773 0.0773 1 0.0727 1 0.0727 0.0000 89.0579 89.0579 0.0223 0.0000 89.5272 rr (D 3 n 0 N Ql CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.3 Building Construction - 2015 Mitigated Construction On -Site Off -Road 0.1336 1.0961 • 0.6842 • 9.8000e- 004 Total 0.1336 1.0961 ' 0.6942—p.8000e- 004 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 13 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 0.0773 0.0773 0.0727 0.0727 1 0.0000 89.0578 • 89.0578 0.0223 0.0000 89.5271 i 0.0773 0.0773 0.0727 0.0727 0.0000 89.0578 89.0578 • 0.0223 0.0000 89.5271 rt T 3 n 0 v_ J CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.4 Paving - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Oft -Road 9.8000e- 0.1015 0.0634 9.0000e- 003 ; 005 ------------------------ Paving 1.6900e- 003 Total 0.0115 1 0.1015 0.0634 9.0000.7' 005 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 14 of 27 6.1200e- 6.1200e- 5.6400e- 5.6400e- 003 003 003 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' ' 6.1200e. 6.1200e. 5.64009- 5.6400e- 003 003 003 003 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 0.0000 8.7149 8.7149 2.53000- 0.0000 8.7681 003 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ? 0.0000 0.0000 I 8.7149 I 8.7149 12. 003 e- 0.0000 1 8.7681 Q CO N O r C) N N N co 0 N N M O N -O d O +' 2 W C _W M C U C V N .NO r C +�+ N > N C o O U W > G> W M A M a m �o o ao m m � o o 10 0o o 1 l0 0 O 1 0 0 O G I O O O O b I� ' to b O m 1O MpIp Off,) M O N p I p N O N 1 o N 1 CD to h ao to I� o n of I Ip ao � o ao I O o I p o 0 ta00 1 0 �o b ' Io m OM N to I 1 ui b i ' to b VO b ' to tC I o I I �c b I I I i b o u� 1 Oh oo� ai 1 1 00 of M 1 ' � 0 o I 1 � I I O o N o o b � � 1 Ib o o N 00 10, co I M, 0 v m o c c m tr Item C.D218 '+ (D 3 n 0 _N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On -Site Page 16 of 27 Archit. Coating0.8713 • 0.0000 0.0000 •• • , , , • 0.0000 - 0.0000 Off -Road 5.0800e- 0.0321 0.0238 4.000Oe- 003 2.7600e- r2.7600e- Y 2.76009 2.7600e- 005 ' 003 003 003 003 Total 0.8764 0.0321 0.0238 4.0000e- 0.0000 0.0000 2.7600e- ' 2.7600e- ' 0.0000 2.7600e- ' 2.76009- 0.0000 ----------- Worker -------+-------------------------------T-------4-------4-------'--------------- 8.6000e- 1.3000e- 005 3.000Oe- 2.1900e- 003 003 5.8000e- 2.0000e- 003 003 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ----------- Worker -------+-------------------------------T-------4-------4-------'--------------- 8.6000e- 1.3000e- 0.0136 3.000Oe- 2.1900e- 2.0000e 2.2100e- 5.8000e- 2.0000e- 6.000Oe- ., 004 003 005 003 005 003 ' 004 005 004 Total 8.6000e- 1.3000e- 0.0136 3.00009- 2.19009- 2.0000e- 2.2100e- 5.80000- 2.0000e- 6.0000a- 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 1 004 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 3.1916 3.1916 4.2000e- 0.0000 3.2003 004 0.0000 3.1916 3.1916 1 4.2000e- ' 0.0000 , 3.2003 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 --7-------4-------7-- r 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 ~ 2.0330 r 2.0330 r1.2000e- r 0.0000 T 2.0355 004 0.0000 I 2.0330 I 2.0330 1.2000 004 e. I 0.0000 2.0355 rt I'D 3 n 0 N N O CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.5 Architectural Coating - 2015 Mitigated Construction On -Site Page 17 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM Archit. Coating 0.8713 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -- -------------------------------- Off -Road 5.0800e 0.0321 0.0238 4.000Oe T 2.7600e- 2.7600e- 2.7600e- + 2.7600e- T T4.2000e- 003 005 003 003 1 1 0.0000 3.1916 3.1916 0.0000 3.2003 ' 1 003 003 004 Total 0.8764 0.0321 0.0238 4.000Oe- 2.7600e- ' 2.76OOe- ' 2.7600e- 1 2.7600e- 0.0000 3.1916 1 3.1916 4.2000e. 0.0000 005 003 003 003 003 3.2003 004 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile m 3 n v N N CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Page 18 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM Mitigated 0.5813 1.7332 6.2872 0.0115 • 0.7777 • 0.0223 0.7999 0.2080 • 0.0205 0.2284 i 0.0000 943.2494 ' 943.2494 ' 0.0407 0.0000 944.1031 .. ' ' ' • i Unmitigated 0.5813 1.7332 6.2872 0.0115 0.7777 0.0223 0.7999 0.2080 T 0.0205 T 0.2284 • • 0.0000 ' 943.2494T 943.2494T 0.0407 T 0.0000 r 944.1031 4.2 Trip Summary Information ..................................... General Office Building 55.15 ' + •i------------- -- 55_15 --- -F 55.15 - ----.----i--------1,876,103 177,664 177,664 Hotel ....................................•_---- 786. 24 t 786_24 ----H----------- }•--• - --- ------ +-----------•-----•-----------•--------------------- _______ ________________• 1,876,103 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 Total 841.39 841.39 841.39 2,053,767 2,053,767 4.3 Trip Type Information General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 ' 48.00 19.00 77 19 q ...__.._..._--------�-- -- - Hotel - Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 ' r _•"_ - """" """""" - 61.60 _ i 19.00 _ _ - 58- - 3g Parkin " Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 19 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 0.474745• 0.065936• 0.172132: 0.156409• 0.055843• 0.009120; 0.016202: 0.038647: 0.001119, 0.001338 0.004871; 0.000723; 0.002914 §.Q Agffgg Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Electricity • 1,076.779 1,076.779 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated 3 0.0000 ----------------------- • 1,076.779 1,076.779 -----------4 Electricity T. ------ w______r______w------ w------- r-____T-_---_w______T____ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -__ 0.0000 Unmitigated .. . . 0.0000 615.0676 - 615.0676 , Y 0.0113 _ • _'' _ _ _ _ _ • NMuralGas w ------- +_____________+--_----r----__r--__--r_-____r___---r--__--T_--____ 0.0622 - 0.5650 • 0.4746 3.3900e- ' 0.0429 • 0.0429 , 0.0429 0.0429 Mitigated • . 003 , , , , . _ _ -T______t NaiuralGas _-__-_t--___-T_-____T____-_T_.____T___-___ 0.0622 0.5650 0.4746 3.3900e- 0.0429 0.0429 • 0.0429 0.0429 Unmitigated 003 , 0.0000 • 1,076.779 1,076.779 0.0495 0.0102 1,080.993 3 3 3 0.0000 ----------------------- • 1,076.779 1,076.779 7------- 0.0495 • 0.0102 ------ _.__.0.0000 1,080.993 3 3 3 0.0000 615.0676 - 615.0676 0.0118 Y 0.0113 ? 618.8108 0.0000 x615.0676 615.0676T 0.0118 0.0113 ? 618.8108 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.22 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Page 20 of 27 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 �7.000Oe- __ +. T 7.0000e- 1 0.0000 0.9739 r 0.9739 , 2.000Oe- 2.0000e- 0.9798 005 General Office 18250 �� 1.00000- 8.9000e- 7.5000e- r1.0000e- r T7.000Oe Building y, 004 004 004 7.000Oe- 0.0429 + +, 614.0937 614.0937 0.0118 0.0113 617.8309 005 005 005 Hotel 1.15077e +- 0.0621 0.5641 0.4739 3.3800e- T 0.0429 r 0.0429 +007 +, 0.0429 0.0000 615.0676 003 0.0118 0.0113 618.8108 ' 1 Total 11 0.0622 0.5650 0.4746 3.3900e- 0.0429 ' ' 0.0429 003 Mitigated Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i �7.000Oe- __ T 7.0000e- 1 0.0000 0.9739 r 0.9739 , 2.000Oe- 2.0000e- 0.9798 005 005 y 005 005 ______ ._______--------,_______T______-_______________T------ 0.0429 0.0429 + 0.0000 614.0937 614.0937 0.0118 0.0113 617.8309 i ' 1 7704297' 0.0429 0.0000 615.0676 615.0676 0.0118 0.0113 618.8108 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated General Office 53450 11- 15.2956 7.0000e- 1.5000e- 15.3555 Building 6; 004 004 Hotel +, Hotel 3.70844e 1,061.231 0.0488 0.0101 1,065.385 + +006 �, , 91 ------9---------- :--------4----------------1----- Parkin Lot - 880 +: 0.2518 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.2528 i. 005 TotalI II 1 07.779 I 0.0495 I 0.0102 1,083.993 Mitigated General Office 53450 1 15.2956 7.00OOe- 1.5000e- 15.3555 Building , �, 004 004 ____ ____. 1, Hotel ______, ______- ______. r3.70844e +, 1,061.231 r 0.0488 r 0.0101 ? 1,065.385 +006 9 1 Parkin Lot 9 :------:-------�---------------------- 880 0.2518 1.O000e- 0.0000 0.2528 +, 005 TotalII 1, 076.779 1 0.0495 I 0.0102 1 1,080.993 3 6.0 Area Detail Page 21 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 22 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area Mitigated 0.9010 4.000Oe- 3.6200e- 0.0000 ' 1.00000- ' 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- ' 1.000Oe- + 0.0000 6.8000e- 6.8000e _ 005 ; 003 ; 005 ; 005 005 ; 005 j 0.0000 7' 003 - - - - - - - - - -------------- - ------------- ------T------------ 003 003 2 OOb ; -- T------T-------..-----------�•--_---�•_-----T Unmitigated 0.9010 4.000Oe 3.6200e 0.0000 1.00000 1.00000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 6.8000e- ' 6.8000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 ? 7.2100e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory n Unmitigated m 3 n b N N 01 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated Page 23 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Mitigated •• 19.3777 0.1339 3.3100e- 23.2159 003 Unmitigated m 19.3777 T 0.1339 T 3.3100e ? 23.2180 .. 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated General Office 0.888669 /+ 5.3249 0.0292 7.3000e- 6.1647 Building ; 0.544668 004 -'.."------�-------r------i-------T------ Hotel -3.19621 / +: 14.0528 0.1048 2.5800e- 17.0533 ; 0.355135 6. 003 ------9---- - - - - - -+, , Parkin Lot ---------- 0/0 + 0.0000 ______,_______,- 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 Total' II 19.3777 0.1339 3.3100e- 23.2180 003 Mitigated General Office 0.888669/A 5.3249 0.0292 7.3000e- 6.1643 Building ; 0.544668 i; 004 Hotel 3.19621 / 14.0528 0.1047 2.5800e- 17.0516 0.355135 i, 003 . +, , ' " - _ _ Parking Lot _ - ___ w -------r-- - 0/0 + 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 0.0000 TotalI II 19.3777 I 0.1339 3.3100 003 e- I 23.2159 8.0 Waste Detail Page 24 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM fD 3 n v N N 00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Catego!yNear Mitigated • 14.9462 • 0.8833 0.0000 • 33.4955 .. Unmitigated w.______T_tet •• 14.9462 0.8833 T 0.0000 ...... 33.4955 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated General Office 4.65 +- 0.9439 0.0558 0.0000 2.1154 Building a. Hotel 68.98 i- 14.0023 • 0.8275 • 0.0000 • 31.3801 Parkin Lot 0 +� 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1 11 14.9462 1 0.8833 1 0.0000 1 33.4955 Page 25 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM 3 n 0 N tJ 1.0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated General Office 4.65 A 0.9439 0.0558 0.0000 2.1154 Building +, Hotel 68.98 14.0023 0.8275 0.0000 31.3801 Parking Lot 0 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1 11 14.9462 1 0.8833 1 0.0000 F13.4955 9.0 Operational Offroad 10.0 Vegetation Page 26 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 10.2 Net New Trees Species Class 77 Psi i� r' r I. Miscellaneous 140 1,- 99.1200 0.0000 0.0000 99.1200 i. Total 99.1200 1 0.0000 0.0000 7' 99.1200 Page 27 of 27 Date: 2/26/2014 10:23 AM RESOLUTION NO. 14-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00508, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 126 -ROOM HOTEL AND A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE PAD ON 2.97 -ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT WITHIN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0210-081-13. A. Recitals. 1. Mr. Charlie Buquet of Consolidated Consulting filed an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2013-00508, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of March 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly notice public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced hearing on March 26, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property locked at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street, with a street frontage on 6th Street of approximately 562 feet and a lot depth of approximately 267 feet, and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is zoned Industrial Park within the Haven Overlay District and is developed with office buildings; the property to the south is zoned Industrial Park within the Haven Avenue Overlay District and is developed with office buildings; the property to the east is zoned Industrial Park and is developed with a warehouse building; and the property to the west, across Haven Avenue, is zoned Industrial Park within the Haven Overlay District and is developed with a technical school; and C. The project site is vacant with no existing buildings or structures that require demolition or a loss of a historic resource; and. d. The applicant is concurrently processing a Tentative tract Map SUBTPM19474 to • divide the parcel into two separate parcels; and e. The applicant is proposing to construct a hotel building and a pad for an office building, which are permitted uses within the Haven Overlay District; and Item C,13231 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-12 DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 2 f. The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and g. The project design incorporates a monument sign with enhanced landscape, a tower element that provides a focal point, the use of two primary materials, a porte-cochere and decorative pavement, thereby meeting the design goals of the Haven Overlay and Industrial Park District by providing a high-level of architectural design; and h. The project will promote land use goals of the Industrial Park District within the Haven Avenue Overlay District by allowing for a hospitality use to be developed in close proximity to office, commercial, and food uses that will maximize the economic position of the Haven Avenue corridor by capturing regional demand for lodging facilities in the vicinity of the 1-10 Freeway and Ontario International Airport. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on. October 22, 2008, in connection with the City's approval of the Design Review of a 122 -room hotel. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Item C,D232 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-12 DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 3 b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the design review of the 126 -room hotel and the subdivision of the parcel into two lots, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The new project is similar in size as the previous approval and the new updated studies have identified only a minor change to the previous mitigation measures. This change is in accordance with the previous Mitigation Monitoring Program, but a revision to one of the conditions now requires the site to be treated with water three times a day instead of once a day to reduce fine Particulate Matter Emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 during grading operations. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less -than -significant. The project is substantially the same as the previous project with the exception that 4 rooms have been added and a 3,000 square foot office pad has been added and included in the Addendum's analysis. The analysis concludes that the project will not have a significant increase on traffic or a significant impact on air quality. The updated studies indicate no new significant effects that were not previously analyzed, and the Addendum to the original environmental mitigation monitoring program is minor. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Development Review DRC2013-00508 and adopts an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts that was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the construction of a four-story, 126 -room hotel building and the conceptual design of an office pad for a 3,750 square foot office building at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and 6th Street — APN: 0210-081-13. 2) Approval is for a 126 -room hotel with the incidental serving of beer and wine under a Type 41 License from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). The hotel operator shall adhere to all food service requirements and operation regulations for a Type 41 License as prescribed by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). 3) All perimeter on-site and street frontage landscaping shall be completed prior to occupancy being granted. 4) All outdoor furniture and site furnishings visible to public view, • including, but not limited to, trash receptacles, benches, and bollards shall be uniform in design. Item C,13233 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-12 DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 4 5) All light fixtures shall have glare shields in order to confine the area of illumination within the project site. 6) All signs shall meet the City's Sign Ordinance requirements. 7) Final design of the enhanced pavement at the entry points of the project, pool perimeter, and project perimeter fencing shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval during plan check. 8) Any modification or any intensification of the use beyond what is specifically approved by this Resolution of Approval and all Conditions of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-00508 shall require the filing of any required land use entitlement(s), review and approval by either the Planning Manager or Planning Commission in accordance with the Development Code. Revisions to the hotel's operation that shall require either Planning Manager or Planning Commission review shall include, but are not limited to, requests for an ABC License other than the incidental serving of beer and wine under a Type 41 License. Requests to serve distilled spirits and/or the operation of a bar shall require the filing and review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit and the issuance of all applicable license(s) from ABC. 9) The applicant shall adhere to all Mitigation Measures in Resolution 08-57. Engineering Services Department 1) No new median openings on Haven Avenue or on 6th Street medians. 2) Pads below streets, the first 6 feet of the driveway, should slope away from the right-of-way (back of sidewalk) elevation at no more than 6 percent. 3) The parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top -of -curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 4) Overhead utilities on the north side of 6th Street east of Haven Avenue were previously placed underground by the developer of Design Review 86-07. The current owner of the property at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street and is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of utility undergrounding from adjacent properties as outlined in Utility Reimbursement Agreement URA -02. The developer of APN: 0210-081-13 shall fulfill its obligation for fair share payment as outlined in said agreement, prior to final map or building permit issuance whichever occurs first. 5) The developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service from Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. Installation of service shall be as follows: Item C,13234 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-12 DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 ® Page 5 (1) Applicant will be responsible for the following: (a) Off -Site Cabling: The applicant will be responsible for all off-site distribution costs to include all cables and connections of the line extension from where RCMU's current distribution cable ends between 26th Street and Jersey Boulevard off Haven Avenue to the applicant's property. (b) On-site Cabling and Equipment: The applicant will be responsible for all on-site cabling and equipment costs to include service connections, transformers, and meters on the applicant's private property. (c) Installation Options: The applicant has the option to perform this work or have the utility perform this work under Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section B. (d) Should the applicant choose to perform this work, Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section D and Section E will apply. (e) Should the applicant choose to have the utility perform this twork, Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section C will apply (2) RCMU will be responsible for the following: (a) 1) Design: The utility will be responsible for planning, designing, and engineering distribution line extensions using the utility's standards for material, design, and construction. (Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section A. 1). The applicant may elect to design that portion of the new distribution line extension normally designed by the utility in accordance with the applicant design provisions of Rule (Municipal Code 3.46. 160 Section D). (b) 2) Off -Site Substructures: The utility will be responsible for the construction costs of the off-site substructure including the trench, conduit, vaults, and street repair of the line extension from approximately 8th Street to the Applicant's property (c) 3) On Bill financing: Should the applicant choose this option, the Utility will agree that the applicant may finance their line extension costs by providing this option of on -bill financing pursuant to Municipal Code 3.46.030 Section. H 2 and subject to the terms of the Line extension agreement. The City stipulates that the financing period will not exceed that of sixty (60) months. 41 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-12 DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 6 (3) Both Parties Responsibilities: Line extension agreement: Both parties will be required to execute a line extension agreement. The agreement would have a stipulation that states that in the event that any additional customer(s) subsequently initiates service that is provided using the Distribution Line Extension within ten years, the utility will similarly determine the additional customer(s) proportional cost responsibility for the Distribution Line Extension paid for by the applicant and provide a refund to the original applicant that have previously contributed to cover the cost. of the Distribution Line Extension. (Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section. C 6a). 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning. Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of March 2014, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • is COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2013-00508 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW APPLICANT: CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SIXTH STREET - APN: 0210-081-13 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: • A. General Requirements completion Date The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-12 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X B. Time Limits ® 1. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. Item C,D237 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 9. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 11. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including; but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 2. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible 2 Item 0238 n L` Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 5. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash I I and debris remain for more than 24 hours. -- 6. Textured. pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 9. The design of store fronts shall compliment the architectural program and shall have subtle variations subject to Design Review Committee approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 10. All future projects within the center shall be designed to be compatible and consistent with the architectural program established. --- E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be 3 Item C,13239 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., I_I_ over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 2. All development projects subject to TDM (Transportation Demand Management) provisions shall reserve and designate at least 10 percent of the employee parking spaces for the project for ridesharing vehicles by marking such spaces "CarpoolNanpool Only.". 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development. 4. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. Bus shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad. Bus shelters shall be located outside public right- of-way and shall be privately maintained. 5. All development projects where TDM (Transportation Demand Management) provisions apply shall provide shower and locker facilities for use by employees or tenants who commute to the site by bicycle or walking. Such facilities shall be clearly indicated on all development/improvement plans. One shower and eight lockers with minimum dimensions of twelve inches (12") by eighteen inches (18") by thirty-six inches (36") shall be provided for each two hundred (200) employees or fraction thereof, based on the equivalent development size data. The shower and locker facilities must be located convenient to one another and should be located near the employee bicycle parking facilities whenever possible. H. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 4 Item 0240 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date ® 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 - gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 8. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Haven ® Avenue and Sixth Street. 9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on' the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. I. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. J. Environmental 1. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall -be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation ® measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. Item C,13241 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date K. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the, U.S..Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY.SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). L. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2013-00508) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineers stamp and "wet' signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (DRC2013-00508). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. D Item C,D242 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the • applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official /_/_ for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits: 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. B. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). 9. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2 -inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non - buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non -Buildable Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino ® Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 7 Item C,13243 IJ 7 8 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date Roofing materials shall be Class "A." Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with —/—/— the CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. I I- 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. —/_/— THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. �- 2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs orby deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 3. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint/— maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 4. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated / or noted on the final map. 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 6. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated tothe City. 7. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum / of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. N. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos,/— landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a / /— source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to 8 Item C,D244 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date • energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Notes: (a) 6 -foot wide curb adjacent through right tum lane / bus bay (b) install street trees on private property beyond public sidewalk when adjacent to right turn lane / bus bay (c) relocate traffic signal equipment and any utilities as required and install R26(s) "No Stopping signs along frontage (d) provide conduit for future fiber optic cable, location to be determined and approved by City Engineer prior to approval of Public Improvement Plans (e) install northbound right turn / deceleration lane (f) install eastbound bus bay / right turn lane on the south side of 6th Street. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety ® lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City is Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A 9 Item C,D245 Commercial Street Curb - Curvilinear Drive Street Trees side St. Name 8" Curb Gutter Sidewalk (a) Approach Lights (b) Drains Other Haven X X X X X X X (c)(d) Ave. (e) 6th Street X X X X X X X (c)(d) cfl Curb & Side- Drive Street StreetComm Median Bike Name Gutter walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail I Other Notes: (a) 6 -foot wide curb adjacent through right tum lane / bus bay (b) install street trees on private property beyond public sidewalk when adjacent to right turn lane / bus bay (c) relocate traffic signal equipment and any utilities as required and install R26(s) "No Stopping signs along frontage (d) provide conduit for future fiber optic cable, location to be determined and approved by City Engineer prior to approval of Public Improvement Plans (e) install northbound right turn / deceleration lane (f) install eastbound bus bay / right turn lane on the south side of 6th Street. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety ® lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City is Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A 9 Item C,D245 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in / /— accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The/— completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet — (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape. plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Any private landscape plans that show street trees: All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /— adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. . O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water,�— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the �— Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days 10 Item C,D246 Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Haven Avenue TBD TBD Fill in 6th Street TBD TBD Fill in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Any private landscape plans that show street trees: All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with / /— adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. . O. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water,�— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the �— Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days 10 Item C,D246 �J Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. —/—/— Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. P. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting —/—/— Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD - 1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD -2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 4. Prior to approval of the final map, or prior to improvement agreement approval if no map is involved, all Tract Maps, Parcel Maps and public improvement plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Division on a compact disc (CD) in Adobe Acrobat Professional format. If public improvement plans are completed after map approval, the CD shall be submitted prior to issuance of a construction permit for frontage improvements or a building permit, whichever occurs first. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Security Lighting —/—/— All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1 -foot candle power. �— These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo censored cell. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, �— with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. The lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. The lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal -resistant fixtures.—� R. Security Hardware A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. One -inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are�— within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 11 Item C,D247 Project No. DRC2013-00508 completion Date 3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal�— gates, or alarmed. S. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the �— police with a keypad access and a unique code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this code is changed because of a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. T. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be �— lifted from frame or track in any manner.. 2. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing.pedestrians and traffic. 3. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and�— impede entry to burglars. 4. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or �— prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. U. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for nighttime visibility. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall �— be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. 3. At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of�— project shall be erected with vandal -resistant cover. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Department. 4. All developments shall submit an 8 '/Z' x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi - tenant developments.to the Police Department as approved by the Building and Safety Services Department. V. Alarm Systems 1. Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and�— employees on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: �— (909) 941-1488. 12 Item C,D248 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.cityofrc.us. W. Commercial Fire Standard Conditions FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10.—/_ FSC -2 Fire Flow The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual —�—� pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be usedto provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing —/ water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. ® 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 -feet of —/—/— the proposed project site. FSC -3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems/— Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit —/—/— plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. FSC -4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the —/—/— California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC -5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard —� require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. 13 Item C,D249 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date FSC -6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard.. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1 st story exterior wall shall be located within�- 150-feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District Access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are:�— a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 -feet, 6 -inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be �— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high -piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high -piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District access to all required openings. 4. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus�— access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with �— RCFPD Standard 5-9. 14 Item 0250 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date ® 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall be in accordance with the Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one -foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. ® 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan /— illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9. Roof Access: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There —/—/— shall be a means of Fire Department access from the exterior walls of the buildings onto the roofs of all commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. • g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. 15 Item C,D251 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC -10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Dry Cleaning Plants • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • Refrigeration Systems • Public Assembly • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC -12 Hazardous Materials — Submittal to Fire Construction Services. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances. and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC -13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. Map Recordation Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have 16 Item C,D252 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date • provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FSC -15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS - Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, _/_/_ specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600 -foot radius of the project. Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. ® All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. — — — PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' 'Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION – Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at ® each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of. the most hydraulically 17 Item C,D253 Project No. DRC2013-00508 Completion Date remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler / monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access I I_ roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi -family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/2 -inch by 11 -inch or 11 -inch by 17 -inch Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 18 Item C,D254 RESOLUTION NO. 14-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19474, AN INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION OF LAND INTO TWO PARCELS ON 2.97 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND 6TH STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0210-081-13. A. Recitals. 1. Mr. Charlie Buquet of Consolidated Consulting filed an application for the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19474, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 26th day of March 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: ® 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on March 26, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the southeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street, with a street frontage on 6th Street of approximately 562 feet and a lot depth of approximately 267 feet, and is presently vacant land; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is zoned Industrial Park. within the Haven Overlay District and is developed with office buildings; the property to the south is zoned Industrial Park within the Haven Avenue Overlay District and is developed with office buildings; the property to the east is zoned Industrial Park and is developed with a warehouse building; and the property to the west, across Haven Avenue, is zoned Industrial Park within the Haven Overlay District and is developed with a technical school; and C. The project site is vacant with no existing buildings or structures that require demolition or a loss of a historic resource; and hotel; and d. The applicant is concurrently processing a Design Review to construct a 126 -room ® e. The project, together with the recommended conditions of approval, complies with all minimum development standards for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Item C,13255 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-13 SUBTPM19474 — CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable specific plans by meeting all the applicable minimum requirements of each of the documents; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans as the map complies with minimum dimensions and sizes of the district in which it is located; and c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed as it is located in an industrial zoned district; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat as the site is vacant of any vegetation and within an improved industrial area; and e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems as it involves the division of one parcel into two at the intersection of two improved public streets; and f. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration in October 22, 2008, in connection with the City's approval of the Design Review of a 122 -room hotel. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes. have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the subdivision and the design review of the 126 -room hotel, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more seven: impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Under CEQA, the subdivision on its own accord would be categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as it is a Minor Land Division (Section 15315) Item C,13256 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-13 SUBTPM19474 — CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 3 of less than four parcels. Additionally, the hotel is substantially the same as previously approved. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The project is substantially the same as the previous project with the exception that four rooms have been added and a 3,000 square foot office pad has been added and included in the Addendum's analysis. The analysis concludes that the project will not have a significant increase on traffic or a significant impact on air quality. The updated studies indicate no new significant effects that were not previously analyzed, and the Addendum to the original environmental mitigation monitoring program is minor. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19474 and adopts an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts that was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department is 1) Approval is for the subdivision of one 2.97 -acre parcel into two parcels (one 0.51 acre and the second 2.46 acres) at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street — APN: 0210-081-13 r �J 2) The subdivision will be developed in accordance with plans on file in the Planning Department, as approved by the Planning Commission. 3) The project applicant shall require that the grading contractor comply with all applicable measures listed in SCAQMD Rule 403 to control fugitive dust including the application of water to all exposed surfaces a minimum of three times per day throughout the duration of grading operations. 4) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction related noise sources and noise sensitive receptors nearest the project site during all project construction. 5) Future office product for the site shall adhere to the architectural guidelines of the Haven Overlay District. 6) The applicant shall adhere to all Mitigation Measures in Resolution 08-57. Item C,D257 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-13 SUBTPM19474 — CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 4 Engineering Services Department 1) No new median openings on Haven Avenue or on 6th Street medians. 2) Pads below streets, the first 6 feet of the driveway, should slope away from the right-of-way (back of sidewalk) elevation at no more than 6 percent. 3) The parkways shall slope at 2 percent from the top -of -curb to 1 foot behind the sidewalk along all street frontages. 4) Overhead utilities on the north side of 6th Street east of Haven Avenue were previously placed underground by the developer of Design Review 86-07. The current owner of the property at the northeast corner of Haven Avenue and 6th Street is eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of utility undergrounding from adjacent properties as outlined in Utility Reimbursement Agreement URA -02. The developer of APN: 0210-081-13 shall fulfill its obligation for fair share payment as outlined in said agreement, prior to final map or Building Permit issuance whichever occurs first. 5) The developer shall execute a Line Extension Agreement for electric service from Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider for all project related development. Installation of service shall be as follows: (1) Applicant will be responsible for the following: (a) Off -Site Cabling: The applicant will be responsible for all off-site distribution costs to include all cables and connections of the line extension from where RCMU's current distribution cable ends between 26th Street and Jersey Boulevard off Haven Avenue to the applicant's property. (b) On-site Cabling and Equipment: The applicant. will be responsible for all on-site cabling and equipment costs to include service connections, transformers, and meters on the applicant's private property. (c) Installation Options: The applicant. has the option to perform this work or have the utility perform this work under Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section B. (d) Should the applicant choose to perform this work, Municipal Code 3.46. 160 Section D and Section E will apply. (e) Should the applicant choose to have the utility perform this work, Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section C will apply Item C,13258 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-13 SUBTPM19474 — CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 • Page 5 (2) RCMU will be responsible for the following: (a) 1) Design: The utility will be responsible for planning, designing, and engineering distribution line extensions using the utility's standards for material, design, and construction. (Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section A. 1). The applicant may elect to design that portion of the new distribution line extension normally designed by the utility in accordance with the applicant design provisions of Rule (Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section D). (b) 2) Off -Site Substructures: The utility will be responsible for the construction costs of the off-site substructure including the trench, conduit, vaults, and street repair of the line extension from approximately 8th Street to the Applicant's property (c) 3) On Bill financing: Should the applicant choose this option, the Utility will agree that the applicant may finance their line extension costs by providing this option of on -bill is financing pursuant to Municipal Code 3.46.030 Section H 2 and subject to the terms of the Line extension agreement. The City stipulates that the financing period will not exceed that of sixty (60) months. (3) Both Parties Responsibilities: Line extension agreement: Both parties will be required to execute a line extension agreement. The agreement would have a stipulation that states that in the event that any additional customer(s) subsequently initiates service that is provided using the Distribution Line Extension within ten years, the utility will similarly determine the additional customer(s) proportional cost responsibility for the Distribution Line Extension paid for by the applicant and provide a refund to the original applicant that have previously contributed to cover the cost of the Distribution Line Extension. (Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section. C 6a). 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MARCH 20114. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA is BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman Item C,13259 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-13 SUBTPM19474 — CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 6 ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of March 2014, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item C,13260 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBTPM19474 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICANT: CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND SIXTH STREET - APN• n9in-nAi-1 q ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 0 A. General Requirements U The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-13 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Manager hearing. a) Notice of Exemption - $50 X Item C,13261 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date B. Time Limits This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which I I_ include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street. improvement plans shall be coordinated for I_I_ consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 8. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 9. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 11. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 2 Item C,13262 • Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date D. SHOPPING CENTERS 1. The Master Plan is approved in concept only. Future development for (each building pad/parcel) shall be subject to a separate Development/Design Review process. 2. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 3. Provide for the following design features in each trash enclosure, to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager: a. Architecturally integrated into the design of (the shopping center/the project). b. Separate pedestrian access that does not require the opening of the main doors and to include self-closing pedestrian doors. c. Large enough to accommodate two trash bins. d. Roll -up doors. e. Trash bins with counter -weighted lids. f. Architecturally treated overhead shade trellis. ® g. Chain link screen on top to prevent trash from blowing out of the enclosure and designed to be hidden from view. 4. Graffiti shall be removed within 72 hours. 5. The entire site shall be kept free from trash and debris at all times and in no event shall trash I I and debris remain for more than 24 hours. 6. Textured pavement shall be provided across circulation aisle, pedestrian walkway, and plaza. They shall be of brick/tile pavers, exposed aggregate, integral color concrete, or any combination thereof. Full samples shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. All future building pads shall be seeded and irrigated for erosion control. Detailed plans shall be included in the landscape and irrigation plans to be submitted for Planning Department approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 8. The lighting fixture design shall compliment the architectural program. It shall include the plaza area lighting fixtures, building lighting fixtures (exterior), and parking lot lighting fixtures. 9. The design of store fronts shall compliment the architectural program and shall have subtle variations subject to Design Review Committee approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 10. All future projects within the center shall be designed to be compatible and consistent with ® the architectural program established. Item C,D263 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date E. Building Design All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that.projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll -up doors and service doors to match main building colors. F. Parking and Vehicular Access (indicate details on building plans) 1. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 2. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 3. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 4. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. G. Trip Reduction 1. Bicycle storage spaces shall be provided at a rate equivalent to 5 percent of all required motorized vehicle parking, with a minimum of one rack with a capacity for two bicycles. 2. All development projects subject to TDM (Transportation Demand Management) provisions shall reserve and designate at least 10 percent of the employee parking spaces for the project for ridesharing vehicles by marking such spaces "CarpoolNanpool Only.". 3. Category 5 telephone cable or fiber optic cable shall be provided for office buildings and other non-residential development 4. Transit improvements such as bus shelters, bus pullouts, and bus pads shall be provided. Bus shelters shall also include a bench, a trash receptacle, and an adjoining bike rack (minimum 3 capacity) on a concrete pad. Bus shelters shall be located outside public right- of-way and shall be privately maintained. 5. All development projects where TDM (Transportation Demand Management) provisions apply shall provide shower and locker facilities for use by employees or tenants who commute to the site by bicycle or walking. Such facilities shall be clearly indicated on all development/improvement plans. One shower and eight lockers with minimum dimensions of twelve inches (12") by eighteen inches (18") by thirty-six inches (36") shall be provided for each two hundred (200) employees or fraction thereof, based on the equivalent development size data. The shower and locker facilities must be located convenient to one another and should be located near the employee bicycle parking facilities whenever possible. Item C,D264 ® H. Landscaping U Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development'occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. A minimum of 20 percent of trees planted within industrial projects, and a minimum of 30 percent within commercial and office projects, shall be specimen size trees - 24 -inch box or larger. 3. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 4. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 5. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 6. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 - gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 8. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along Haven Avenue and Sixth Street. 9. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 10. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 11. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. Item C,D265 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date I. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a partof this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. J. Environmental Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Manager in the amount of $ 581 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. K. Other Agencies The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). L. Building and Safety Industrial and Commercial Standard Conditions —/!- 1. Submit five completesets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (SUBTP.M19474) clearly identified on the outside of all plans 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet' signature are required prior to plan check submittal. Item C,D266 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date ® 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Business shall not open for operation prior to posting the Certificate of Occupancy issued by the Building and Safety Services Department. 6. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (SUBTPM19474). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the School Fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Prior to issuance of permit issuance for a new residential project or major addition, the ® applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, and Transportation Development Fee. 4. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new commercial or industrial development project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. The applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permits issuance. 5. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. For projects using septic tank facilities, shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 7. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 8. Construct trash enclosure(s) per City Standard (available at the Planning Department public counter). 9. All commercial/public/multi-family development swimming pool plans shall be. submitted to the County of San Bernardino's Environmental Health Services Department for review and ® approval prior to approval from the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 10. The following is required for side yard use for increase in allowable area: 7 Item 0267 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date a. Provide a reduced Site Plan (8 1/2 -inches by 11 inches), which indicates the non - buildable easement. b. Recorded "Covenant and Agreement for the Maintenance of a Non -Buildable. Easement," which is signed by the appropriate property owner(s). New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturers "high wind" instructions. 4. Plans for food preparation areas shall be approved by County of San Bernardino Environmental Health Services prior to issuance of Building Permits. 5. Provide draft stops in attic areas in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 6. Roofing materials shall be Class "A." 7. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CBC. S. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC. 9. Walls and floors separating dwelling units in the same building shall be in accordance with the CBC. 10. Provide smoke and heat venting in accordance with CBC. 11. Upon plan check submittal, additional requirements may be needed. THE APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: M. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 2. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 3. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 4. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. 0 Item 0268. 4 • N. CJ Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date 6. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City. 7.Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Notes: (a) 6 -foot wide curb adjacent through right turn lane / bus bay (b) install street trees on private property beyond public sidewalk when adjacent to right turn lane / bus bay (c) relocate traffic signal equipment and any utilities as required and install R26(s) "No Stopping signs along frontage (d) provide conduit for future fiber optic cable, location to be determined and approved by City Engineer prior to approval of Public Improvement Plans (e) install northbound right -turn / deceleration lane (f) install eastbound bus bay / right -turn lane on the south side of 6th Street. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. ® b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. R Item C,D269 Commercial Street Curb - Curvilinear Drive Street Trees side St. Name 8" Curb Gutter Sidewalk (a) Approach Lights (b) Drains Other Haven X X X X X X X (c)(d) Ave. (e) 6th Street X X X X X X X (c)(d) Notes: (a) 6 -foot wide curb adjacent through right turn lane / bus bay (b) install street trees on private property beyond public sidewalk when adjacent to right turn lane / bus bay (c) relocate traffic signal equipment and any utilities as required and install R26(s) "No Stopping signs along frontage (d) provide conduit for future fiber optic cable, location to be determined and approved by City Engineer prior to approval of Public Improvement Plans (e) install northbound right -turn / deceleration lane (f) install eastbound bus bay / right -turn lane on the south side of 6th Street. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. ® b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. R Item C,D269 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: /_ 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The I I_ completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet — (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Any private landscape plans that show street trees: All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." 10 Item C,13270 Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. Haven Avenue TBD TBD Fill in 6th Street TBD TBD Fill in Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Any private landscape plans that show street trees: All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." 10 Item C,13270 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date ® If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. O. Utilities • P. • Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water,�— gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. —/—/- 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the —/—/— Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. General Requirements and Approvals A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for —/—/— all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting�— Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD - 1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD -2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 4. Prior to approval of the final map, or prior to improvement agreement approval if no map is involved, all Tract Maps, Parcel Maps and public improvement plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Division on a compact disc (CD) in Adobe Acrobat Professional format. If public improvement plans are completed after map approval, the CD shall be submitted prior to issuance of a construction permit for frontage improvements or a building permit, whichever occurs first. 11 Item C,D271 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Q. Security Lighting 1. All parking, common, and storage areas shall have minimum maintained 1 -foot candle power. �— These areas should be lighted from sunset to sunrise and on photo sensored cell. 2. All buildings shall have minimal security lighting to eliminate dark areas around the buildings, with direct lighting to be provided by all entryways. The lighting shall be consistent around the entire development. 3. The lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal -resistant fixtures.—/— R. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors.—/ - 2. One -inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are �— within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal �— gates, or alarmed. S. Security Fencing 1. All businesses or residential communities with security fencing and gates will provide the —/—/— police with a keypad access and a unique Code. The initial code is to be submitted to the Police Crime Prevention Unit along with plans. If this Code is changed because of a change in personnel or for any other reason, the new code must be supplied to the Police via the 24-hour dispatch center at (909) 941-1488 or by contacting the Crime Prevention Unit at (909) 477-2800 extension 2474 or extension 2475. T. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be /— lifted from frame or track in any manner. 2. Storefront windows shall be visible to passing pedestrians and traffic. � �- 3. Security glazing is recommended on storefront windows to resist window smashes and�— impede entry to burglars. 4. Security/burglar bars are not recommended, particularly in residences, due to the delay or �— prevention of a speedy evacuation in case of fire. U. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for �— nighttime visibility. 2. Developer shall paint roof top numbers on one or more roofs of this development. They shall �— be a minimum of three feet in length and two feet in width and of contrasting color to background. The stencils for this purpose are on loan at the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. 12 Item C;D272 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date ® 3. At the entrances of commercial or residential complexes, an illuminated map or directory of —� project shall be erected with vandal -resistant cover. North shall be at the top and so indicated. Sign shall be in compliance with Sign Ordinance, including an application for a Sign Permit and approval by the Planning Department. 4. All developments shall submit an 8 '/z' x 11" sheet with the numbering pattern of all multi - tenant developments to the Police Department as approved by the Building and Safety Services Department. V. Alarm Systems Install a burglar alarm system and a panic alarm if needed. Instructing management and employees on on the operation of the alarm system will reduce the amount of false alarms and in turn save dollars and lives. 2. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: (909) 941-1488. 941-1488. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD50 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards which are referenced in this document can be access on the web at www.citvofrc.us. W. Commercial Fire Standard Conditions • FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: Reference the RCFPD Standard 5-10. FSC -2 Fire Fire Flow The required fire flow for this project is calculated gallons per minute at a minimum residual �— pressure of 20 pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with California Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The required minimum fire flow for this project may be reduced by 50 percent when automatic fire sprinklers are installed. 2. Public fire hydrants located within the immediate vicinity of the proposed project may be used to provide provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire protection water supply plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until the fire protection water supply plans are approved. 4. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 6004eet of —�—� the proposed project site. FSC -3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems —/—/— Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit —�—�— • plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply Approval of the underground supply pp it g pp y piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. 13 Item C,D273 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date FSC4 Requirements for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems Automatic fire sprinklers shall be installed in buildings as required by the current editions of the California Fire Code, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ordinance and/or any other applicable standards that require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed. FSC -5 Fire Alarm System & Sprinkler Monitoring The current edition California Building/Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance and Fire Alarm Standard —/ require most fire sprinkler systems to be monitored by a Central Station sprinkler monitoring system. A manual and or automatic fire alarm system may also be required based on the use and occupancy of the building. Plan check approval and a Building Permit are required prior to the installation of a fire alarm or a sprinkler monitoring system. Plans and specifications shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services in accordance with RCFPD Fire Alarm Standard. Refer to the specified documents for the system requirements. FSC -6 Fire District Site Access: Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access Roadways Standard. Location of Access: All portions of the structures 1 st story exterior wall shall be located within—/ - 150 -feet of Fire District vehicle access, measured on an approved route around the exterior of the building. Landscaped areas, unpaved changes in elevation, gates and fences are deemed obstructions. 2. Specifications for private Fire District Access roadways per the RCFPD Standards are: a. The minimum unobstructed width is 26 feet. b. The maximum inside turn radius shall be 24 feet. c. The minimum outside tum radius shall be 50 feet. d. The minimum radius for cul-de-sacs is 45 feet. e. The minimum vertical clearance is 14 feet, 6 inches. f. At any private entry median, the minimum width of traffic lanes shall be 20 feet on each side. g. The angle of departure and approach shall not exceed 9 degrees or 20 percent. h. The maximum grade of the driving surface shall not exceed 12 percent. i. Support a minimum load of 80,000 pounds gross vehicle weight (GVW). j. Trees and shrubs planted adjacent to the fire lane shall be kept trimmed to a minimum of 14 -feet, 6 -inches from the ground up. Vegetation shall not be allowed to obstruct Fire Department apparatus. 3. Access Doorways Approved doorways, accessible without the use of a ladder, shall be —/— provided as follows: a. In buildings without high -piled storage, access shall be provided in accordance with the current edition of California Building/Fire Codes and/or any other applicable standards. b. In buildings with high -piled storage access doors shall be provided in each 100 lineal feet or major fraction thereof, of the exterior wall that faces the required access roadways. When railways are installed provisions shall be made to maintain Fire District. access to all required openings. 14 Item C,D274 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date 04. Access Walkways: Hardscaped access walkways shall be provided from the fire apparatus—/— access road to all required building exterior openings. 5. Building Access: Knox boxes for site and building access are required in accordance with —/—/— RCFPD Standard 5-9. 6. Commercial/Industrial Gates: Any gate installed across a Fire Department access road shall —/—/— be in accordance with the Fire District Standard. The following design requirements apply: a. Prior to the fabrication and installation of the gates, plans are required to be submitted to Fire Construction Services (FCS) for approval. Upon the completion of the installation and before placing the gates in service, inspection and final acceptance must be requested from FCS. b. Gates must slide open horizontally or swing inward. c. Gates may be motorized or manual. d. When fully open, the minimum clearance dimension of drive access shall be 20 feet. e. Manual gates must be equipped with a RCFPD lock. The lock must be purchased at the Fire Administration Office. f. Motorized gates must open at the rate of one -foot per second. g. The motorized gate actuation mechanism must be equipped with a manual override device and a fail-safe or battery backup feature to open the gate or release the locking Mechanism in case of power failure or mechanical malfunction. h. Motorized gates shall be equipped with a Knox override key switch. The switch must be installed outside the gate in a visible and unobstructed location. i. For motorized gates, a traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. j. If traffic pre-emption devices (TPD) are to be installed, the device, location and operation must be approved by the Fire Chief prior to installation. Bi-directional or multiple sensors may be required due to complexity of the various entry configurations. 7. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department for approval. 8. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted —/—/— on the Site Plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. 9. Roof Access: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard 5-6. There —/—� shall be a means of Fire Department access from the exterior walls of the buildings onto the roofs of all commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential structures more than 10,000 square feet or with roof more than 15 feet in height and less than 75 feet above the level of the fire access road. a. This access must be reachable by the Fire Department aerial ladder. b. A minimum of one ladder point with a fixed ladder shall be provided in buildings with construction features, or high parapets that inhibit roof access. c. The number of ladder points may be required to be increased, depending on the building size and configuration. d. Regardless of the parapet height or construction features the approved ladder point shall be identified in accordance to the roof access standard. 15 Item C,D275 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date e. Where the entire roof access is restricted by high parapet walls or other obstructions, a permanently mounted access ladder is required. f. Multiple access ladders may be required for larger buildings. g. Ladder construction must be in accordance with the RCFPD Roof Access Standard Appendix. h. A Site Plan showing the locations of the roof ladder shall be submitted during plan check. i. Ladder points shall face a fire access roadway(s). FSC -10 Occupancy and Hazard Control Permits Listed are those Fire Code permits commonly associated with the business operations and/or building construction. Plan check submittal is required with the permit application for approval of the permit; field inspection is required prior to permit issuance. General Use Permit shall be required for any activity or operation not specifically described below, which in the judgment of the Fire Chief is likely to produce conditions that may be hazardous to life or property. • Candles and open flames in public assemblies • Compressed Gases • Dry Cleaning Plants • Explosive or Blasting Agents • Repair Garages • Refrigeration Systems • Public Assembly • Tents, Canopies and/or Air Supported Structures • LPG or Gas Fuel Vehicles in Assembly Buildings FSC -12 Hazardous Materials — Submittal to Fire Construction Services. Plans shall be submitted and approved prior to construction of buildings and/or the installation of equipment designed to store, use or dispense hazardous materials in accordance with the current editions of the California Building, Fire, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical Codes, RCFPD Ordinances and other implemented and/or adopted standards. FSC -13 Alternate Method Application - Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. Map Recordation 1. Reciprocal Agreements for Fire Department Emergency Access and Water Supply are _/ required on this project. The project appears to be located on a property that is being subdivided. The reciprocal agreement is required to be recorded between property owners and the Fire District. The recorded agreement shall include a copy of the Site Plan. The Fire Construction Services shall approve the agreement, prior to recordation. The agreement shall be recorded with the County of San Bernardino, Recorder's Office. 2. Reciprocal Access Agreement — Please provide a permanent access agreement between the owners granting irrevocable and a non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District to gain access to the subject property. The agreement shall include a statement that no obstruction, gate, fence, building or other structure shall be placed within the dedicated access, without Fire Department approval. The agreement shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. 3. Reciprocal Water Covenant — Please provide a permanent maintenance and service covenant between the owners granting an irrevocable and non-exclusive easement, favoring the Fire District for the purpose of accessing and maintaining the private water mains, valves 16 Item C,D276 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date and fire hydrants (fire protection systems facilities in general). The covenant shall have provisions for emergency situations and the assessing of cost recovery to the property by the Fire District. FSC -15 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel map into the Community Facilities District #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of Grading or Building Permits. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS - Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any Building Permits: Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600 -foot radius of the project. • Please reference the RCFPD Water Plan Submittal Procedure Standard. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14'6" above the finished surface of the road. 4. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 5. Easements and Reciprocal Agreements: All easements and agreements must be recorded with the County of San Bernardino. — — — PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services' 'Temporary Power Release Checklist and Procedures." PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION – Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on .the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On • private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 17 Item C,D277 Project No. SUBTPM19474 Completion Date 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be . submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler monitoring system must be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. The fire sprinkler monitoring system shall be installed, tested and operational immediately following the completion of the fire sprinkler system (subject to the release of power). 5. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 6. Fire Alarm System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire alarm system shall be installed, inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 7. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 8. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 9. Address: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-7, 5-8 and/or 5-5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial/industrial and multi -family buildings shall post the address in accordance to the appropriate RCFPD addressing Standard. 10. Hazardous Materials: The applicant must obtain inspection and acceptance by Fire I I_ Construction Services. 11. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Must be in accordance with the RCFPD Standard 5-11. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, a 8 1/2 -inch by 11 -inch or 11 -inch by 17 -inch Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. 18 Item C,D278 RANCHO CUCAMONGA SIGN -IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MARCH 26, 2014 NAME " COMPANY AD ESS/EMAIL i_ 7T9A, Cr`eck- p /fie Coit, CC- 60 � PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-13 SUBTPM19474 — CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 5 , (2) RCMU will be responsible for the following: (a) 1) Design: The utility will be responsible for planning, designing, and engineering distribution line extensions using the utility's standards for material, design, and construction. (Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section A. 1). The applicant may elect to design that portion of the new distribution line extension normally designed by the utility in accordance with the applicant design provisions of Rule (Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section D). (b) 2) Off -Site Substructures: The utility will be responsible for the construction costs of the off-site substructure including the trench, conduit, vaults, and street repair of the line extension from approximately 8th Street to the Applicant's property. (c) 3) On Bill financing: Should the applicant choose this option, the Utility will agree that the applicant may finance their line extension costs by providing this option of on -bill financing pursuant to Municipal Code 3.46.030 Section H 2 and subject to the terms of the Line extension agreement. The City stipulates that the financing period will not exceed that of sixty (60) months. (3) Both Parties Responsibilities: Line extension agreement: Both parties will be required to execute a line extension agreement. The agreement would have a stipulation that states that in the event that any additional customer(s) subsequently initiates service that is provided using the Distribution Line Extension within ten years, the utility will similarly determine the additional customer(s) proportional cost responsibility for the Distribution Line Extension paid for by the applicant and provide a refund to the original applicant that have previously contributed to cover the cost of the Distribution Line Extension. (Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section. C 6a). Grading 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs) devices. 2) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant C a�9 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-13 SUBTPM19474 —CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 6 shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 3) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 4) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. This condition shall be noted in the inspection and maintenance portion of the Water Quality Management Plan. 5) Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the CC&R's addressing the cross lot drainage and maintenance of the structura[/treatment best management practices (BMP's) devices, along with the approved conditions of approval prior to recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan and issuance of a grading permit. 6) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA C, ) 179 -carat ".1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-12 DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 6 (3) Both Parties Responsibilities: Line extension agreement: Both parties will be required to execute a line extension agreement. The agreement would have a stipulation that states that in the event that any additional customer(s) subsequently initiates service that is provided using the Distribution Line Extension within ten years, the utility will similarly determine the additional customer(s) proportional cost responsibility for the Distribution Line Extension paid for by the applicant and provide a refund to the original applicant that have previously contributed to cover the cost of the Distribution Line Extension. (Municipal Code 3.46.160 Section. C 6a). Grading 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to issuance of the grading permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMPs) devices. 2) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 3) Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to issuance of a grading permit. 4) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. This condition shall be noted in the inspection and maintenance portion of the Water Quality Management Plan. 5) Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the CC&R's addressing the cross lot drainage and maintenance of the structural/treatment best management practices (BMP's) devices, along with the approved conditions of approval prior to recording of the L, 6 " 3 6 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-12 DRC2013-00508 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING March 26, 2014 Page 7 Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan and issuance of a grading permit. 6) A Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: ATTEST: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of March 2014, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: �Cz"ry Of V F ,IiLRANCHO vmw - J CUCAMONGA C A L I F L . F-, rd I A Site & UP • Industrial Park • Haven Overlay • 126 -Room Hotel with the incidental serving of beer and wine • Hotel is a permitted use • 2.97 Acre Parcel • Parcel subdivided into a .51 Acre Parcel and 2.46 Acre Parcel • 3,000 Square Foot Office Pad City of -- r RANCH LCUCA'vt_ Parcel Map C A L 1 Fk F f 't e �A A l� Background & MND • Previous Project: A 122 -Room Hotel • Design Review With Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) • Addendum to MND --�Ci ty ofAnn" �i� CL I F R "•! 1Site Plan W Z Q Z a SIXTH STREET Wnl7pU! • to. I uox + �....r.---� � + e .�. Jig R„ • � .Ji .ter �Ji '-"— -4. / e + r ' + wwxw I94.2 � ' ' �' i••y g 1 - ` O • a o a o a ■ .,x ma ;.rM � ....—fir � (. m i� +• —•� �r � ._. • Pool • Basketball Court • Fire Pit • Trellis Feature Decorative Concrete �, iL i•1 EKI MN•Mill mill. .1 rrs >•i . i•I 1 i•1 i• g , ' I 1 '"� 1 � �' ldfwi�ri�1 i• 1 i•1 11 i•1 �1.. .,��< 1 1 i•1 - City of RANCHO CUCAMONGAM,.- Perspective + - A L I F R N ! • Front Entrance • Pool Area • Tower Elements I= mm= p LU t I 444 PER m IZ if Co -IR Al( AV AN ;=f 14L Ma ���� & A 'W, my m. Zi Co -IR � 0 .�. �: � � �' • � t / dP , ' r ., _: �. t s- _. t y -� 0', %l}' Cid 4.1 R A N C H 0 CUCAMONGA A L I F 'R r.1 1 A 6TH ST. mmlcwrmx pow" ----.L �ED UM ST� AR� ----------------------- 08�D ALL -G nVAEUMM fW IW �ME�GLI Wrg� ATAM�M WITHN TRIA�� TYP 47 ALL —H— (Q$lFtL-TLGK J-1 Po DocE 1C CLEAN ruk POLE wopoff ZOW si : PROPOSED 126 ROOM - FOUR STORY 11 RESIDENCE INN HOTEL 13 City of Recommendation Adopt an Addendum to the MND of Environmental Impacts that was previously adopted on 10-22-08 and approve Design Review DRC2013-00508 and Tentative Parcel Map,,SUBTPM19474 Approval with conditions. by adoption of Resolutions of