Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-04-23-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC
.4 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP OF RANCHO Cuc"ONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 23, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center RAINS ROOM 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California IL7::: I. CALL TO ORDER (� Pledge of Allegiance v Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell_ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz_ Wimberly_ Oaxaca_ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS r7 This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. FF� III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00136 - SRM DEVELOPMENT: A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan for a facility that provides independent, assisted living,and memory care housing on the undeveloped portion of a property of 9.5 acres that is partially developed with a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP APRIL 23, 2014 Page 2 church(Highland Avenue Community Church)in the Low(L)Residential District at 9944 Highland Avenue-APN: 0201-055-49. FIF IV. ADJOURNMENT , . 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 17, 2014,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at(909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your nairie'for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION � WORKSHOP APRIL 23, 2014 Page 3 Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and • governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us VicinityMap PlanningWorkshopCommission April 23 C C i E d o C + L 1 a _ = 2 , � Z I 1 0 C P.Endg Tf i . 19th St t Base Line 4a YBase t a Church urc Foothillt Foothill N AArrow s Arrow J rosy C t 8th p� s _ C9 6th o C 6th w .0 a Y 4th a = _ 4th * Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic CenterDriv-m Item A: Pre-application Review DRC2014-00136 STAFF REPORT PLANNING DEPARTNIF.NT ;7 DATE: April 23, 2014 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager BY: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00136 - SRM DEVELOPMENT - A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan for a facility that provides independent, assisted living, and memory care housing on the undeveloped portion of a property of 9.5 acres that is partially developed with a church (Highland Avenue Community Church) within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9944 Highland Avenue -APN: 0201-055-49 GENERAL: A. Pre-Application Review Process: The Pre-Application Review process is intended to promote quality development and to facilitate the development review process. Although a Pre-Application Review is not required, it allows an applicant to present schematic • designs to the Planning Commission during the early stages of concept plan preparation prior to the formal application and to receive broad, general comments and direction from the Planning Commission. The meeting is not a forum for debate and no formal decision or vote is made. After the meeting, staff prepares general minutes of the meeting that are sent to the applicant. B. Site Description: The project site is the mostly vacant part of a property that is developed with Highland Avenue Community Church (referred to hereafter as "the overall site") located at 9944 Highland Avenue approximately 980 feet west of Hermosa Avenue. The overall site is approximately 414,024 square feet (9.53 acres) in area. The specific location of the project site is at the west side of the overall site (Exhibit B). The project site is approximately 166,000 square feet (3.81 acres) in area with overall dimensions of approximately 340 feet (east to west) and 650 feet (north to south). Immediately to the west of the project site is a San Bernardino County flood control channel (partly underground) and beyond that is a condominium complex. To the south is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and to the north are single-family residences. At the north side of the project site, there are several recreational amenities that are used by the church such as a playground, basketball courts, and several shade structures; these improvements are proposed to be removed. C. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning (relative to the overall site) Project Site—Vacant (part) and Highland Avenue Community Church; Low (L) Residential District North - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District South- Foothill Freeway (SR-210) East - Single-Family Residences; Low (L) Residential District West - Condominium Complex; Medium (M) Residential District Item A-1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00136-SRM DEVELOPMENT April 23, 2014 Page 2 D. General Plan Designations (relative to the overall site): Project Site- Low Residential District North - Low Residential District South- N/A East - Low Residential District West - Medium Residential District E. Proiect Description: The applicant proposes to construct a Residential Care Facility as defined in Section 17.32.020(A)(16) of the Development Code (Exhibit 1). The facility will be comprised of two (2) buildings with 112 units for senior citizens who are 75 years of age and older and who are in need of a variety of care options. The combined floor area of the buildings will be 103,257 square feet. One of the buildings, the "Assisted Living" building, is a . two-story building of 91,256 square feet that will be used for the independentlassisted living component of the facility. It will have 96 units. There will be a mix of unit types (floor area in parenthesis)within this building—32 studio apartments (450 to 550 square feet), 52 one bedroom/one bathroom apartments (650-750 square feet), and 12, two bedroom/two bathroom apartments (950-1,050 square feet). All of these units will have kitchens. The other building, the "Memory Care" building, is a one-story building of 12,001 square feet that be used for the memory care component of the facility. This building will have 16 units. The memory care units do not include kitchens (Exhibit G). ANALYSIS: A. General Plan and Zoning: Per Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code, Residential Care Facilities are not permitted within the Low(L) Residential District (Exhibit H). In order to allow the proposed land use, the applicant will be required to apply for an amendment to the Zoning Map designation of the subject property. Residential Care Facilities are permitted in both the Medium (M) and Medium High (MH) Residential Districts. However, the most logical Zoning designation is Medium (M) Residential. This designation is most consistent with the designation of the multi-family property to the west and is compatible with the church that occupies part of the overall site. Because of the irregular shape and size of the lot, standard single-family residential development consistent with the Low (L) Residential District would be difficult. Along with the amendment to the Zoning designation, an amendment to the underlying General Plan designation from Low Residential to Medium Residential will be required. B. Land Use Compatibility: The overall site is bound by single- and multi-family residential development to the north, east, and west (Exhibit B). The proposed residential care facility, as with facilities that are similar in purpose, is expected to have operating characteristics that will have a minimal impact, e.g., noise and traffic impacts are expected to be low. Therefore, staff believes that the facility would be generally compatible with the surrounding residential development. The most significant impact will likely be related to the availability of parking. Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the required parking for congregate care facilities is based on a ratio of one parking stall per four (4) beds. Using this ratio and assuming 124 bedrooms (one bed per studio or bedroom), the facility requires 31 parking stalls (124 x 0.25 = 31). The applicant is providing 58 parking stalls. To ensure that parking will be sufficient, the applicant will be required to submit a parking study. Item A-2 i PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00136— SRM DEVELOPMENT April 23, 2014 • Page 3 The proposed facility is similar to other residential care facilities that are in predominantly residential areas in the City that were approved at, for example, 9519 Base Line Road (Sunrise at Alta Loma, Related file: Development Review DR99-32), 6729 Hermosa Avenue (Valencia Commons, Related file: Conditional Use Permit CUP99-08) and 9428 19th Street (Sunlit Gardens, Related file: Conditional Use Permit CUP00-33). The respective zoning designation for each of these facilities is Office Professional (OP) District, Low Medium (LM) Residential District, and Medium (M) Residential District. Staff notes to the Commission that prior to the Development Code Update in September 2012, Residential Care Facilities were permitted in the Low Medium (LM) District with a Conditional Use Permit and were permitted by right, i.e. without a special land use entitlement, within the Office Professional (OP) District. Following the Development Code Update, the subject land use is no longer permitted within either development district. The subject land use is permitted in the Medium (M) Residential District with a Conditional Use Permit. C. Site Layout and Technical Characteristics: The design guidelines and policies established by the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission stress the importance of having the buildings dominate the project site. Historically, when the opportunity is available to do so, i.e., when there are no significant site and/or vehicle circulation constraints, both the Committee and the Commission favor having the buildings close to the street. This, in tum, results in a parking area that is either behind the buildings relative to the street or in a less prominent area of the site. The layout of the project site and plotting of the buildings is generally consistent with these design goals, guidelines, and policies. The Assisted Living building and Memory Care building will be located at the south and north sides, respectively, of the project site. The building heights of the Assisted Living and Memory Care buildings will be 34 feet and approximately 24 feet, respectively. The massing of the buildings should be compatible with the surrounding properties. The single-family residences to the north and the buildings within the condominium complex to the west all are two-story structures. The proposed building setback at the rear property line is approximately 28 feet, while the proposed building setback (measured from the curb face at Highland Avenue) is approximately 50 feet. The proposed building setbacks at the side property lines is 10 feet. The proposed height of the buildings comply with the height limit and the proposed building setback dimensions meet or exceed the required building setbacks applicable to both the Low (L) and Medium (M) Residential Districts. The parking lot will be located between the buildings. The principal entrances for both buildings will face the parking lot. There will be a rectangular landscaped courtyard of approximately 24,500 square feet between the east and west wings of the Assisted Living building. An additional landscaped courtyard of approximately 2,250 square feet will be at the rear of the Memory Care building. The remainder of the site will be landscaped per City requirements. Vehicle access to the site will be via a new driveway. This driveway will be jointly.used by the applicant and the existing church. Access to-the-church will-also- be available via two (2) existing driveways (one of these driveways may be eliminated to fulfill the Engineering Services Department's technical requirements that apply to separations between driveways). Because of its location and alignment, the new drivewa (Exhibits E and F). y • will also serve as a physical separation between the proposed facility and the church Item A-3 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00136—SRM DEVELOPMENT April 23, 2014 Page 4 D. Design and Technical Comments: The applicant is advised that design and technical comments will be provided following the submittal of a formal Development Review application. Staff recommends that the project incorporate the following: 1. Enhancements to the architecture of the buildings including wall plane articulation, variation in the building materials, shade structures at the building entrances, and building elements/features that provide aesthetic focal points. 2. Architectural features and details present on all elevations, i.e. 360-degree architecture is per the Design Review Committee and Planning Commission policy. E. Formal Application Submittal Requirements: In addition to the applications for the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, the applicant will be required to apply for a Conditional Use Permit and a Development Review. The following applications/documents (and associated fees)will be required at the time of formal submittal: 1. General Plan Amendment (for changing the land use designation from Low Residential to Medium Residential): $11,913.00 2. Zoning Map Amendment (for changing the zoning designation from Low (L) Residential to Medium (M) Residential): .$8,882.50 3. Tentative Parcel Map (for subdividing the subject parcel into two (2) parcels): $7,701.65 4. Development Review (for review of the technical and design characteristics of the project): $9,823.00 5. Conditional Use Permit (for review of the operational characteristics of the land use): $2,978.25 6. Environmental Assessment, Initial Study - Part 1: $2,664.75 7. Tree Removal Permit: $772.26 8. Sign Permit (for Notice of Filing Signs): $120.18 9. Deposit for two (2) Notice of Filing Signs (one per street frontage for supplemental public notification purposes): $613 per sign F. Special Studies: The following special studies will be required at the time of formal submittal: 1. Air Quality Study (including an analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and local significance thresholds) 2. Arborist Study 3. Biological Study 4. Noise Study 5. Parking Study 6. Photometric Study Item A-4 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00136—SRM DEVELOPMENT April 23, 2014 • Page 5 7. Trip generation and trip distribution study for AM/PM peak hours. Based on the results of the trip generation and trip distribution study, a Traffic Impact Analysis may be required for affected intersections. NOTE: Additional special studies may be required following the formal submittal of the required applications. G. Technical Requirements/Comments—Engineering: 1. This parcel fronts onto the 1100-foot portion of Highland Avenue between Archibald and Hermosa Avenues where the pavement width drops from 44 to 34 feet, with only 12 feet south of the street centerline. The parcel frontage comprises 60 percent of the length of the substandard street width and is the only remaining undeveloped property on this segment of Highland Avenue. Development that increases the traffic will warrant widening to the full collector street width. 2. Widen the south side of Highland Avenue to 22 feet, measured from centerline to face of curb (or 20 feet to AC berm), from approximately 240 feet east of the east property line to approximately 125 feet west of the west property line. Tree removal and replacement subject to Planning Department review. 3. The drive approaches shall be at least 35 feet wide, measured at the right-of-way • line, and conform to our commercial standard. The existing drive approach that will be used for deliveries shall be widened as well. The driveway centerlines shall be separated by 150 feet, both on-site and relative to driveways on the adjacent properties. Provide a 25-foot stacking distance from the curb to the near edge of any parking stalls that are perpendicular to driveway drive aisles. 4. Frontage improvements already in place include curb adjacent sidewalk and street lights. Additional public improvements will include drive approaches and street trees. The existing overhead utilities shall be placed underground, along the entire frontage of the existing parcel, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. H. Technical Requirements/Comments — Building and Safety: Complete building data must be provided on the design review plans such as the proposed occupancies, type of construction, number of floors, square footage per floor, type of sprinkler design criteria (13, 13R), building setbacks. I. Technical Requirements/Comments—Building and Safety (Grading): Conceptual grading review comments will be provided when a conceptual' grading and drainage plan is submitted for review. • Item A-5 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP STAFF REPORT PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00136—SRM DEVELOPMENT April 23, 2014 Page 6 J. Technical Requirements/Comments—Fire Construction Services: 1. The fire department apparatus access roads must be designed in accordance with the 2013 CFC Chapter 5 section 503 and the RCFPD Standard 5-1. The plan submitted for design review must demonstrate compliance to the regulations. 2. Complete building data must be provided on the design review plans such as the proposed occupancies, type of construction, number of floors, square footage per floor, type of sprinkler design criteria (13, 13R), building setbacks. 3. A Fire flow letter from CVWD (Local Water Authority). The total square footage and type of construction for the buildings will be required to establish the required fire flow in accordance to the 2013 CA Fire Code Appendix B. Maximum reduction for AFS per the RCFPD Ordinance FD 54 is 50 percent. Respectfully submitted, I " Candyce ett Planning Manager CB:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Photos (provided by the Applicant) Exhibit D - Preliminary Project Data Exhibit E - Preliminary Site Plan Exhibit F - Preliminary Floor Plans and Building Sections Exhibit G - Correspondence from the Applicant Exhibit H - Table 17.30.030-1 —Allowed Land Use and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District(excerpt) Exhibit I - Section 17.32.020—Allowed Use Descriptions (excerpt) Exhibit J - Staff Reports (without exhibits) for Development Review DR99-32, Conditional Use Permit CUP99-08, and Conditional Use Permit CUP00-33 Item A-6 -y W. .,%. 9 r , i 1d MOQV3W Y1o�n` .3 5 �'g S p'c atNBhtltiW 4yyrd �. G -- E <�.-�.'.;_s san g -L.,w'.:•' sAr""••rx t a`�I G°a Y a .., r' Nt G. .;,..,,rr{, ''Sj {r'� 3c:� -L tlai•., R - 1 `. Dtld i` - -- .<... b/' =, :.'_ 5 .'!1's'IIa � rs , o •.�i[... - - R -v_. "' jd3TdYW Atl13151Ntl7 g 9Ynestla1tl303tla1 + c>lc4w Es g ..}d"�'h " a G1. .r a-'O .a xBA•Mq.Ao P.. I �'t 3e- -. R <$ -- g Q. - w I i �H'O" EI_Y■1 pa s..� -5' � Ft8 -il q� •. o p # psa.r: Y1Yi+�" S ., r,,,: W c`S C] g _ t� Q{ I p no6a:+D A�g 4A � x,! QQUCE AVE o,,. - � '- '�' '� _�YDGW�]+ry x3. �yso�s„w,w ^AY3,y � � �er.+9 � c'�`�` �,, __ _. :16.a� 5 ( `�'W 2 • ayosan v. 3AV 1k: W e�lnor� .r':� :I r� . s w € `. .•:° `\ ` �\ '\, t Wr4E,rt• "g�. wraN'•w 'b' < 'mNxrv�ior.�^� `'ty s,. .L c Q i '.•Ewc` % '•�� �` b y� . ,.°Q� �: iY� %vnry i! ll J l doC 1dYr3YHR Tn; 9 e RS W s O dVi MENDDCIxO PA ym i �` •r ~ ¢ -JVAru r,Yr31 .__ Q �.E wlitM a. b I rarnrma ,t Fr,.N' v4.y, a 5. (' OA z g wt 4 Ar 2+''unlr inrNiw6e:� _ arsurb :I u i " ; W 3nY N o• , P"ns W o ! V V leu a rwr9 SW u co D9Nrw r vrn ti tN- r'a AVE y ar Mrg .. 3\ Q U v + ` o 3Atl gQN11YAda- ! s were �� 2 "aA+r] pyMpy ' 93 o'I ¢ p xrT.- G,' 3vx�x s rd.lTos 'O.�'y,. 'i • 3ua L ',nM W - r��. it, �� 5• _,I Y - II 6 1,1 BA.r rmr.fin 'li 'E •;n• ��� y .�AY YDNilrrt < a.�:a's�, � snv _ � 'ca.r -. � � 1+� » �l W-- _ _ a- _- - 3n r10YM g t g E ^ s.K'w 7 • O,� F- U C Q ;I .. 3,rrA7Ard 'Y ¢ MY S .aur..r U 2• ■ , • _ s tl10AtlU N3AVFI u fi� s,m 1 c 1 ' srarar - 1S !YDY Y N3AWH I srarB3n- - lwr]•s t •'3 ! < t S a gEE �s a I' I; 3rrim';YmY..Id NlY3 .' � 3nrvN�lrr" �so.3P`3=,--• 3narAtim ,I s- swim. �. n ,:,}e,.,x;;'.:.9a;* : 8 it 3 k6, I g A3xOr15 >. i k 1 3@ +'•' ']'�WN*xrs .., _ 3nr8 WON r 3NIrYY1 &g W 'sz>. '3108 , y 3AYY11:ytlY'..�,AVE _ srixMr` Wwxu ALT 4a —1 -1—" �I tg g A1�A390ib 1 3Atl -� 3'' %¢ I PEVEPE a [s 8 !b rSavBY] K p�j 3nv L I O 3Ar rnbn' i W,^.1 1 4 3x015 I H 3tl3v3b ,. ter` iSGg BY3,3tl g g SWaMI, �" Svr^,w--add. G �.0 LmeZ� ""SII N r' � s,YAtll138AYw •(1dY a6tl3BAYw g'"-' i S r p Ie > 1]a9DiNalOM V3 .� Q :g Atltl38ArW' r. wra•n. s y'- 3XV bd1N33. �. 1d N114 ANog 3W :a.tlxnro •� h '< aosva ow. w aw nxx3 YNNw _ .a9�f o 3AV a911V3� v I a suasu,rs OU tl3daM ' 0 F- 3AY$ =a3151YN 0 +� a,YAY 3.SYx G G tYvn s r .ri �. g$ .]Y191 Ylr'hN'' �• '... _ N oA O a 3 > u^y 3AV norur 3,r � g,�1 s 2 Mika I 3.xnl,sn y S W2 - o Nr s r A'xlxa = 13swnxs a 3,tl xH3nluw 2g smr """*N 5 _ rramww I crwa:. �i, �+ d 3Atl SNIMltl•Sn o S ! g OC�1-. _ j 3nY SNlrlli _ t-'t;7 3y, G Ar■vux ry u• titmLL xri9lN s z "ii 3/1tl VSaW!l3HI s-_ _ ¢ -3 _ .. _ xYa,N3unr wwxreurw $ _ _ Mnr3e,rn_ �dua,'+ eG �. i1]39aYry g a - 3nM y� ,3AV� V$OWd3H o c vN € 3AV VSOWH3H 3r, g ,� - 3AYABAr,6 36YArxrtl9 15Flrww&, 3Lsurm" 3AV 15Xnxwly fn 3nv ABNYMJ�'l•r .� ,xurw$c z es Y.t• xrwnrr�s 4 �l 0 3AY; 3 YI;A r �' vr,mrwa 3rJ^ 1d 33r1vr tlSID3w,M, 6 4,' -'•,Y�j 3nr HUIOwWYO ` 3SOItl8Wr0 .M lNId AYxI� ' ° : , 3AV 3N01tlBWr. g 3AV 39a111AWtl] 3nr xIfIUW1Mq �w 3nr 3DatlrwVO ryd. x3xrb ,'p c xuww tlra a I, ra ¢ AYM 4. alY3l bV-p\PQ_S9NV �N �v�y .o A' AYM Sdfl11Na ' � G Y� r✓3l AYM Wyit, it R ra+xY3BMV'N Cl"'DN tYr'I $ , e I� AYMr1B1� _nY 3AY t, ,d••.AYAI1fY3J� t ZdN,p N10PNIxG �� 3nr p Y3B 3tlM91Y3B g: 3wND1ni3x{€ _�� dr t 3U1� -3nr 3111b3d S tl0 tlN} 1dY1VeYt RAMONA AVE S c _ L gG 00 o W o � ' ', 3ntltlNOwrtl ,' N-H Y CrDDr MUYfx.' 1 dN33tl0 �M]d4 G .�°°"ma 3E 3011NOWVH .� s c1a "rr dauxplB IC ww lwsixTIN'�d` T ur0otla AV V111A G g lnrousra. 11 $ g £ 9 3nrOMil' 3nr aur ¢b t auuue g� G Door..- F ul Ut o z >d 3oam3an' < r iYE y S x G _@ y, y r,Y,MN,t ■ A' c 3 - � 3AYAONn0UP5 _ e ,nuns Dd ...G 3AVNDD' �q' :i Gg:; AV Irl 0 3AV NOONOI e adyA'�V i3 tF°r s1 : - � 0 G E b g o WAWA"� � � 5`C,� J sBnM• 3rf xu3nlwr ' g y;. ]cNwex .3 D g� ` 3Y 3 vxu3 nw anr n . m ARCHIBAL AVE e v.omax I ( ... lr p S L,..ARCHIBALD SAVE 3rABxn9wu�_ �m uwr, 1 wm' s �� 3a eaY auu Q aADE AVE ■ r5 3AV 3L190Y1' ' � .' Kg a � g � C) �, L 3ngrBu3arr¢ o' § z' a igya s 1 m t, 3nr31i3av1 ' c 31i3mm Y arr ff 1 d ¢�! �3Ar i xrns.'.x$ ' 3I�rNYWsillr< 3 1dx01Nbive '6' $ b ]Atl , 3ntl 3L.3 A UM! g a a Q aro xrwsnlr 3nr xwEprnl 1 NtlwsnlN i 3n3Atl NtlY1SfIlN� ar NAVUAo1S qLg vr' 0 3�I t xw'w03hrU VMY�. NMYSIIIM -' 3rir'.�IUU'rrvw H ' , '3nY311MA1t; anr3uaa31 3nv 31tDo31 3Da81 3Atl311DI131 . LG Al1d 3u ■it y " � ti 3AV 3ux:mrw l 3AY HDtl1tlW '9Atl B11NAb;tlW 1SAA WV .�.- -.._ f�F� .. __ _ _ i _ g M. - - - is 1SAN13WY Aa u o .I m I' ,w3w�z 'I, i \I, ;g .W g 3Noun - uvw3wv3trW g: '�' " 151SAH13WV. -, !' is xoung li g Nouvl> urpur, bye lsxorAn snouv= 3nr Y „ uwur: 1sxolAn" uxaun 3nr u mWV1 N to u noun Z sINO Azdt •I. G YAx0�, ArM la d3enx g- %ANO G 3--V H 3AV SWl3H F . z. �J w f' 9a0aa V1T+ G. g < �J• 3AY rANO pC. >o�Va LO XAND 0 25 G .� 3N � 'L' 1 ?Dlsllix U '$ g ld 3NM 1d ul3Qll0 3nralOMlltla? W .� O dy, �, S E 0 lA%AND _ 9 -WV booMl�Qix m6Yr9ns g q�.y 3 3 3 Q '4b.3nv mDMrwM = 6L 3g1iivd, BuoMxwx eE 3Av HELLMA�AVE W 9 usDxiiuB �'ujw s Vont LL aloWW ..snw.'N bpd y,. U isku A 3nr rw t�, rrx�rlsnn 3 a� i+. ` �,�Yy i �. ¢• I: tJ DooMa9Nwm a nnA r uwAl Pl ✓ 3nns3u3n3 rxruww m < E °N4xY�o i W 3 b ' ' U 1]SNMIId s n :�,u L'01 2 .G 3nv rlrllNxr 3 1e 5� z e s ' wl g ® 8 xmMx]n G ti N w a10.Mx]WB tl xn1EN 3Ar OOOMLSY3 3nY _ h ld'ryilssnroo]'g o $ s � Nmw � g v„�. z.1' ■x S,�s si � is $ o0UNd6n ;,3Ar DOGMJSY3 ] ?d: 9oxxx]bu g r0x9xn a mr.st96 UW uNa ..r 1S Noll WD. . '. 1�a u sG pro �: ,, `+�j 3Ar ltlNlds yy 1 d' 3nv a00ALLsV3I _B�Q N733N191xllYr •t!OHSIB✓�• 3Ar m'r'w 3nv 13xies• fff��x g'4 x031 rcx3MV $ 'U, � �SPINEI Arf 3nr l3NldS 3Atl1mids tdt Y01 3Ar13Nld5 tla3Nv3 Y5i Yi _ $� 35 ,� 1S 1A 98 W A 1s1All30 Na 3sDIx Ab3xw,��¢a s2�"• �• �. w ` is < i ►QQ`.i �14 13NtltlDg Gy oxxw J� [ crDi �'v '1S 13Ny Di �r� LS 13Mw9 �c '121`tlra o 1S 13Ntltl9 �., JSd. 0 G a X 02 7 xx pVE CC! 1NOPN 0. 3nv xYDN ]ne „ a :YpY,�� . 3AV a a w BUCKTIAQ.: Q 3/.r +. 1311tlY9 a 'y] vwlulnlYp w ul U sg o. - c ua;' �E-„ - 11C 3AV NO3ULZ xD]ba yy;;3 g C,' ADW S 1531var ¢ VIIAV 3nv [gr )�j. {G 3 �, �-. �" nN�t ., q OMIx(18 '� I'--'- ' < 3nr r1YwW•t 5 YNIIl Y1�, 1631VUV NOOtlR 3AV NO,1dA1 �{• C.`� OtlrA3NM:i , 34I otlVA3MIA J arU3NM 15 � 'Jr'(A ;r Z ¢¢ 4 m � 3AV OtltlA3NM VINEYARL �® '1s ui Wdo : G gg~ 4s t J J sAx oIEDOA�f ;01111im, 1s lvdo.. W lYd0 lsntlao W Q� vJC = c , : ¢.1 :SAC14AMENTOAVEDi 17 3■ 3d 3� n cc oY�lrx]rs y= Wi 2 'S"ic I.K—A y .. lxois�aaw' Z I r a N3wm37s ffi 5 1 a Ytlpy te ¢ g Q Q c 3SY 3Ar�. 3Ai I 3No15nO0 uJf,l and i,3N01SN00Y1 3nv'Mx� G F 3Ar 3NOlSNPs 3rouxBs 3xolslns�. 3 B 1SN1tlON1 10 tl3ewr $ 3AY= 3 ` la 3nr3rGL4Y1S 3nr 3wlsAsn >: L.�, o G_ r x $c Cf9RNELIAN ST`s �0W10113ml 3AY3g1$NNS 130tlY8 3nY a 3AV OlYj3re iB' ' t�ntl3w�g VW 41rtl3w3 CARNELIAN ST 3AvvlsMOAotltiv 1St _ 1' N"4 twlos 139 add(' 3ntlreim sr s 3,rvwoxosN nvox 7 3AV YdYN �• 3AY tldtlN ! 3AYrdYN' - 17rdYM�wy33r @.j is 2Yda 19! 2Yd01 I 1S radii= 3nr YdtlN$ Jc I r"' 'l' .-'K +0. a .`Yi , Nj$tl311otl1 . '3. 1s 2tld01y 1S91YdU1 lr oavtld 130 .. W. w xnaroMu3ewr' ` ua r� _ �: `-1S 2VdO1 JASPEA ST Ab YroA ■ t c ..._...__.. W lOtll h vw 'W' '.4'r3,. 11OH No*0 Allow �XA ATYNI " ZI y't .. Ytltl}N .. _ 3rlonn a r rN al i � BAROL8 11"31HX3 O f � A EA T/ -C m J _ tom" CALLS EL'EGANTEIL i° i ' i Sol ♦te d �: //���! CALLEHERMOSO . cn �• / ij DAYLILY CD PHILLfPS CAMBRIDGE '�*J j #..?$ r. , 0 ,- # MA ELMHURST \ T GRANBY r , I ' I - Y l• HERMOSA _. . x. •,_ •_ it1 A r'' 'ail a�.` m ®w py}` ,� a.y►J:r' (orf� r [„�I f �y. �.� P. ++` �!! I .ter'!..♦qM PY �.N.a }.,� -set" HIGHLAND AVE,AT SW CORNER OF SITE r °•S - V HIGHLAND AVE, ,7 SE CORNER OF SITE =s (_-. _-:w•+""'� �E+� � -� ; I•� A ��� ♦^ '_ �! .. may_ ___ • ++.,.. _ _ �``�� CENTER OF SITE,LOOKING NORTt I HIGHLAND AVE.COMMUNITY CHURCH,ADJACENT TO EAST ,wl 9 , t YN aL SW CORNER OF SITE AND ADJACENCY TO SITE CAMBRIDGE AVE,RESIDENTIAL STREET EAST OF CHURCH �0 II EI@H X 31 | § 2 7J |72 at | § ! !J� !ƒ 2q} � ! < |■ � } � ! : � | / i § $�( � [ | 2 � ® | § _� _ & | ■ ; | I� & �)t| _ ! ! ` �| � ||| � ■ ;; | - �| |� k f $ - - | ■ „ � | k} ! Ir © ° -- J � | 2\§ ([}!f\) , ! ] «� § �� | 2 § | ■ ,! | � � } \ , { - § ] « ■{ ~ \ @ | ® �} ■ ! | � `` � �» •! f 4 I TZ | ■! | f|!��\!�� � !■ ƒ, $ f7) 7 £! }ƒ §| . ! �! s |� - m x MOPlt= I I II) I I--- > I Zo UT P RKI G P w Q I I 6e STALLS ' L I I U r \` I I TT' l z [� IT L I HIGHLAND AVENUE r L' Q IICOMMUNITY CHURCHuj I N I ASSISTED LIVING \ I w l I BUILDING �\�\�, D w w II II LANDSCAPED I v COURTYARD Ali I I I I I II i j II II I I I , -- ---------------- HIGHLAND AVENUE ARCHITECTURE MERRILL GARDENS AT RANCHO CUCAM(. NGA - RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA All—E•"'' PLAN:SITE PLAN S..(I..W A 98102 e. SCALE:1"=90'-0" T 206 257-09n PROJECT#14-002 .zoe•zs�-o9n 03-26-2014 ��� rn X MEMORY CAIIE — — — Comm I II I II I I I I I I I I I I I PARKING I I I I se STALLS I I I I II I I I _COURTYNO I I I _ I I II — 1I ---------J -- — -- -- LEVELI — — — — — — — LEVEL 2 — ARCHITECTURE MERRILL GARDENS AT RANCHO CUCAMONGA I RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA PLAN:LEVEL 1&2 SCALE:1"=80'-0• PROJECT#14-002 *xos-:s�-osn 03-26-2014 q I BUILDING SECTION A � I �r.o. ROOF II � gooc 1 iI I RES.UNIT LUN Ff..1 L SIOENuNrrsRES-UNIT RES.UNIT crm UN SIOENTML UN ,:} I Uvs 1 I SI UNITS cxw. Icic� erwury � eKON � I I D j ASSITED LIVING BUILDING 1"=25'-0" I � I T I_o ROMbI MEMORY CARE b I I PARKING Woo" DINING 3.5%SLOPE) I I MEMORY CARE BUILDING 1"=25'-O" I I I ARCHITECTURE MERRILL GARDENS AT RANCHO CUCAMONGA OR I,,,N 1 R U I,..i RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA WA9M 01 BUILDING SECTIONS s•+rth W�9111 nueoe.wnK«n... SCALE:I"=45'-0" PROJECT#14-002 'Mfi-251-Nn 03-26-2014 .._........_ Pre-Application Review • Letter of Justification/Explanation Merrill Gardens at Rancho Cucamonga 9944 Highland Ave The current site is on the vacant 3.8 acres of the Highland Ave Community Church property. Merrill Gardens(MG)and SRM Development(SRM)would like feedback from the Planning Commission on the preliminary development plans for an independent&assisted living community with memory care (RCFE). Additional background on MG and SRM is provided below, but specifically,the Applicant would like to understand if the Planning Commission would support the necessary change to the zoning and general plan to allow the use, increase the density,and adjust the parking standards to accommodate the proposed project. An RCFE is not permitted in the current low density residential zoning,but the location of the property seems well suited for this use. The 3.8 acre site is bordered to the west by medium density residential condominiums(two-story,fourplexes)and to the north and east by the remaining church property. Further north and east of the site are single family neighborhoods. To the south is the highway 210. The proposed two-story design should fit well into the context of the existing neighborhood which is predominantly comprised of two-story multifamily and single family homes. Furthermore,the use has a very low impact on traffic,noise,schools,parks,and other city services. The preliminary plans for Merrill Gardens at Rancho Cucamonga include approximately 112 independent/assisted living/memory care units targeted to seniors aged 75 and older. All the units will be licensed to provide assisted living services(ex. bathing,dressing,grooming,medication • management), but the units will target both independent and assisted Irving seniors. The difference between independent seniors and assisted seniors in a Merrill Gardens project is not really age;it is simply the level of care required. The average age is around 85 years old yet most of the seniors that choose to live in Merrill Gardens remain active and require very limited assistance. The attractive features of a Merrill Gardens community include well-sized apartments with kitchens (except the memory care units),outdoor courtyards,common area amenities,quality architecture,and first-class programming. Each of these elements is present in all Merrill Gardens communities and will be part of Merrill Gardens at Rancho Cucamonga as well. Some of the specific amenities include a wine bar/bistro,dining room, hair salon, library,activity room,wellness/fitness center,shuttle transportation, concierge services,and daily activities. Merrill Gardens at Rancho Cucamonga will have these amenities along with a large outdoor courtyard offering incredible views of the San Gabriel Mountains. Residents at Merrill Gardens may choose to rent a studio, one bedroom,or two bedroom unit on a month to month basis. Studios typically range from 450 SF—550 SF,one bedrooms range from 650 SF to 750 SF,and two bedrooms range from 950 SF to 1,050 SF. All units come with fully equipped kitchens and washer dryers. The rental rates start around$3,000 per month for a studio and go up to over $5,000 per month for a two bedroom. The rent includes all utilities except phone,two meals per day, weekly linen service,daily activities,transportation,and access to all common area amenities described above. Assisted living services are charged separately based on the level of assistance required. The quality of Merrill Gardens'projects and corresponding rental rates are intended to target middle to upper income seniors looking for a residential environment with care options available as required. EXHIBIT G Item A-15 A very important aspect of every Merrill Gardens community is the architectural design. As such,SRM Development and Merrill Gardens take pride,in working with the community stakeholders to create a project that"fits"into the surrounding neighborhood. Although Merrill Gardens'communities all have similar common areas and unit types to meet the required programming needs for seniors,there is no prototypical architectural design for a Merrill Gardens community. As a result,the exterior architecture varies from project to project based on input from the local design review committees and neighborhood groups. This process has worked tremendously well in the past and has led to numerous architectural design awards for recent Merrill Gardens and SRM Development projects. Company Backarounds: Merrill Gardens and SRM Development have worked together for over ten years developing, constructing,and operating senior housing projects across the western US. Collectively,as joint venture partners, they have completed thirteen projects with the capacity to serve over 2,000 seniors throughout Washington,California,and Nevada. Merrill Gardens:A One of a Kind Retirement Community Merrill Gardens is one of the top owner/operators of independent and assisted living retirement communities in the country. Merrill Gardens is a family-owned, private company that started with one community in 1993. Since then the company has owned and managed over 70 communities in 10 states with the capacity to serve over 9,000 residents. The management and resources of the Seattle, Washington based company ensure high standards of service and a long-term commitment to lifestyle, quality, security and privacy in all Merrill Gardens communities. The company is built on a strong foundation of family, community, long-term commitment and entrepreneurial spirit. Merrill Gardens has been named the Washington State Family Business of the Year three times in the past ten years and the Better Business Bureau of Washington and Oregon named Merrill Gardens Business of the Year in the large business category. For more information visit the company website at www.merrillgardens.com. SRM Development.,A Different Kind of Development Company SRM Development is a fully-integrated real estate development and construction firm specializing in the development of mixed-use, multifamily and senior housing projects in high barrier to entry markets in the western US. Since 2002, SRM has successfully completed over $1 billion of projects. SRM's current projects total approximately 1 million square feet and over 1,000 units throughout California and Washington. SRM is privately funded with a diverse network of capital sources including high net worth individuals, private equity partners, REITs, and other large institutional investors. SRM Development focuses on the long term ownership of real estate through developing, building, and managing its properties. SRM has in-house expertise in acquisitions, development, construction management, finance, and asset management. This allows SRM to oversee all aspects of a project from "cradle to grave," resulting in better buildings with better long term performance. More information can be found on SRM's website at www.srmdevelopment.com. Item A-16 Article III, Chapter 17.30 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code • TABLE 17.30.030-1 ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Land _ Use/Zoning J a v v v v v o = rn g = Ir a v v District 2 O z O V N Residential Uses = Adult Day Care p p. P P P P N Home N N N fV N N N N N N N R N N Caretaker Housing C C C C C C P P P N N N N C C C C P C P P Dwelling, Multi- Family N N p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dwelling,Second Unit p p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Dwelling,Single- p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Family Dwelling,Two- N N Family p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Emergency Shelter N N N N N N N N C N N N N N C N N N N N N FameDay Care C C C C C Home, Large C N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N • , Family Day Care p p p p p p N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home, Small Guest House P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group C C C C C C C C C C N C N N N N N N C N N Residential Home Occupation P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N I N P P N N Live-Work Facility N N N N N P N N N N N N N N N N IN N N N N Manufactured Home p p P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Mobile eHome ParC C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Park Residential Care Facility N N C C C C N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care Home p p P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Single-Room FacilityOccupancy N N P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N TNN N N EXHIBIT H Item A-17 Article III, Chapter 17.32 Rancho Cucamonga Development Code rent or lease, or were formerly held out for rent or lease and later converted • to a subdivision, cooperative, condominium, or other form of resident ownership, to accommodate mobile homes used for residential purposes. 16. Residential Care Facility. Consistent with the definitions of state law, a residential care facility provides 24-hour nonmedical care for six or more persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life- threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes; but is not limited to, rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of Medical Services, Extended Care. 17. Residential Care Home. Consistent with the definitions of state law (Health and Safety Code §1502), a residential care home is a home that provides 24 hour nonmedical care for six or fewer persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living, or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing • homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of Medical Services, Extended Care. 18. Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) Facility. Multi-unit housing for very low- income persons that typically consists of a single room and shared bath and also may include a shared common kitchen and common activity area. SROs may be restricted to seniors or be available to persons of all ages. Subsidized versions may be supervised by a government housing agency. 19. Transitional Housing. Consistent with Health and Safety Code §50675.2, transitional housing is defined as buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that call for the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months. B. Agriculture and Animal-Related Uses. 1. Agricultural Uses. This use category includes farms, orchards, vineyards, livestock grazing, and hydroponics, including on-site sales of products grown on site. 2. Animal Keeping. Care and maintenance of animals on private property. The listing below provides a distinction between various types of animals related to allowed use provisions in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and • Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). This classification is distinct EXHIBIT I Item A-18 f CITY OF RANCHO CUi AONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: October 13, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner BY: Rebecca Van Buren,AICP,Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 99-32.SUNRISE j ASSISTED LIVING: The proposed development of a an 88-bed, 59-suite, senior assisted living facility on 2.6 acres of land in the Office Professional District, located at 9515 and 9519 Base Line Road-APN: 208-541-01, 208432-017, and 208-432- 018. Related File: Tree Removal Permit 99-30 and Pre-Application Review 98-13 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Commercial, General Commercial District South - Residential, Low District(2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Residential, Low District(2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Residence, Office Professional District B. General Plan Designations: Project Site -Office I North - Commercial South - Low Residential(2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Low Residential(2-4 dwelling units per acre) West - Office C. Site Characteristics: The subject site consists of three parcels totaling 2.6 acres, and slopes from north to south at approximately 3 percent. The site presently contains a nonconforming residence that will be demolished and removed. The site borders residences to the west, south, and east. I D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Number Parking Spaces Spaces i of Use of Beds Ratio ReSuired Provided Assisted Living 88 1/4 beds 22 22 i ANALYSIS: A. Background: The project was reviewed at a Pre-Application Review workshop on January 27, 1999. At that time,the applicant only had the easterly parol consisting of 1.5 acres, and presented a Mediterranean style of architecture. A copy of the minutes is attached(Exhibit "G"). Since that time, Sunrise has acquired two additional parcels creating a larger site area. EXHIBIT J Item A-19 i PLANNING COMMISSIOI&AFF REPORT DR 99-32-SUNRISE ASS"13FtED LIVING October 13, 1999 Page 2 The additional acreage allows the building to be rotated so its main entrance faces Base Line Road and provides significantly better circulation. Sunrise also revised its architecture to a Shingle style. Sunrise conducted a neighborhood meeting on July 27, 1999, at the Lions Center, which was attended by most of the adjoining residential property owners. Sunrise elaborated on the nature of its operations and presented a colored rendering of the wood- shingle two-story building. Neighbors in attendance were pleased with the architectural design and indicated a willingness to work with Sunrise to replace existing wood fences around the project site. The wood shingle wall cladding was later modified to wood siding, in response to concerns of maintenance and weathering(see Section 'D'below). B. General: The proposed assisted living facility is a permitted use in the Office Professional , District The project will have 59 suites with 88 beds. Residents in the assisted living facility are generally in good health and ambulatory, but maintain different levels of self-sufficiency and require personal care assistance. There is a central dining room,television and activity room, sunroom, and parlor. An Alzheimer's special care area is located in a separate self- contained unit in the eastern portion of the facility. It is fully secure with its own garden area j and state of the art electronic controls. The site is located where Amethyst Avenue terminates at Base Line Road and essentially ads as an end point of the Alta Loma historical district. The proposed Craftsman style architecture i is designed to be in keeping with nearby historical buildings. The building includes wood siding as the dominant exterior wall cladding,with shingle accents on turrets, exposed rafter tails,gable end detailing,brackets,and cobble wainscoting along lower levels of the structure. There are three covered porches along the front elevation, a courtyard with two trellis i structures in the rear, and a continuous walking path around the building for residents and their guests. I i Sunrise is providing an aocess easement so that the existing residence to the west will retain existing access to Base Line Road through the subject site at the traffic signal at Amethyst Street. The southerly one-half acre of the site,which is zoned Low Residential,will be planted ias a meadow. C. Tree Removal Permit The site contains 26 trees consisting of fruit trees, pepper trees, and individual eucalyptus trees, according to the arborist's report. The three healthy trees in the meadow will be preserved in place;the remaining trees will be removed due to conflicts with grading and construction. The applicant is providing over 90 new trees of various species, including a mature Magnolia tree(604nch box)in the turning circle at the front. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee(McNiel, Stewart,Fong)reviewed the project on August 31 and October 5, 1999. At the August 31 meeting, the Committee expressed concern regarding how climate and wind would.affect ongoing maintenance associated with wood shingles on large wall areas. The Committee discussed alternative architectural styles, including Mediterranean, Spanish Revival, and Craftsman. The i Committee noted that nearby Amethyst Avenue is part of the historical district of Alta Loma. The Committee encouraged the applicant to explore an architectural style,which would be in keeping with the nearby historical buildings. On October 5, 1999, the Committee reviewed the Craftsman style using predominately wood siding as the exterior wall material and recommended approval. (See Exhibit"H"). Item A-20 PLANNING COMMISSIO�AFF REPORT DR 99-32 -SUNRISE ASSN ED LIVING October 13, 1999 Page 3 E. Technical/Grading Review Committees: The Committees have reviewed the project and recommend approval with conditions. F. Environmental Assessment The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff has completed Part ll. Staff has found that there may be a significant noise impact caused by traffic on Baseline Avenue. The General Plan estimates future noise levels in excess of City standards,which requires a study of noise reduction mitigation measures to be included in the construction design, such as special window glazing. Therefore, a condition of approval is recommended to require an acoustical report prior to the issuance of building permits. The removal of 23 out of 26 existing trees is mitigated because the project landscape design includes planting of 90 trees. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development Review 99-32 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respe submi ed - City Planner j BB:RVBVs Attachments: Exhibit"A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit'B" - Site Plan Exhibit"C" - Floor Plan Exhibit"D" - Elevations Exhibit"E" - Grading Plan Exhibit"F" - Landscape Plan Exhibit"G" - Planning Commission Minutes dated January 27, 1999 Exhibit"H" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated August 31, 1999 and October 5, 1999 Exhibit"I" - Initial Study Resolution of Approval with conditions Item A-71 'S CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - STAFF REPORT 6-1 DATE: June 9, 1999 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner , BY: Salvador M. Salazar,AICP,Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL AS AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-02- CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS -An application to change the General Plan land use designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) to Low-Medium Residential(4-8 dwelling units per acre)for approximately 5.1 acres of land,located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street-APN: 1076-111-09. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT 99-02 - CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - An application to change the Development District zoning designation from Low Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre)to the Low-Medium Residential(4-8 dwelling units per acre) for approximately 5.1 aces of land, located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street-APN: 1076-111-09. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-08 CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS - A request to construct and to operate a two-story residential care facility for the elderly totaling approximately 53,192 square feet in the Low-Medium Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) on approximately 5.1 acres of land, located on the southeast comer of Hermosa Avenue and 19th Street-APN: 1076-111-09. Related tiles:Pre-Application Review 98-08, General Plan Amendment 99-02, and Development District Amendment 99-02, and Landmark Designation 9942. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: Proposed General Plan and Development District regulations will allow the development of 4-8 dwelling units per acre of land. Presently 2-4 dwelling units per acre are authorized. Additionally, the developer is proposing to construct a new two-story building totaling 51,095 square feet,to be used in conjunction with the 2,097 square foot existing single family home to operate a residential care facility for the elderly. B. Surroundina Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residential;Low-Medium Residential District (4-6dwelling units/acre) South - Park and school; Open Space District East - Single family home; Low Residential District(2-4 dwelling units/acre) West - Single family homes; Low Residential District(2-4 dwelling units/acre) Item A-22 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-02, DDA 9942, &CUP 9948-CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS June 9, 1999 Page 2 C. General Plan Designations: , Project Site - Low Residential(2-4 dwelling units/acre) North - Low-Medium Residential(4-8 dwelling units/acre) South - Open Space(Park and School) East - Low Residential(2.4 dwelling units/acre) West - Low Residential(2-4 dwelling units/acre) D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Number Parking Spaces Spaces of Use of Beds Ratio Required . Provided Residential Care Facility 114 1/4 beds 29 67 E. Site Characteristics: The site is located on the southeast comer of 19th Street and Hermosa Avenue. Hamilton Street is located on the south side of the property. The site is presently improved with a single family dwelling unit which has a Potential Local Landmark designation and citrus groves. The site consists of a single parcel approximately 5.1 acres in size and gently slopes from north to south. ANALYSIS: A. Background: The project was reviewed at a Pre-Application Review workshop on November 10'.1098. The Commission offered favorable comments regarding the architecture for the building and site planning. A copy of the minutes is attached (Exhibit"J'�. B. General: The developer is proposing to change the land use and zoning designation of the property,from Low Residential to Low-Medium, in order to allow the use and construction of a residential care facility on the subject site. The residential carefacility is a conditionally permitted use in the Low-Medium Residential'District. The project,as proposed,will have a total of 114 suites for the elderly. The suites are similar to an apartment unit without a kitchen. The retirement facility will have centralized services to provide three meals daily, housekeeping, laundering, private bus transportation, and various activities. The facility will be operated 24 hours a day with staff available at all times. The new developer is proposing to construct a two-story building in order to to continue the residential atmosphere of the neighborhood. The developer is also proposing to incorporate the existing single family home into the proposed residential care facility by converting it into the Club House. The exterior of the house would remain as is. Furthermore,the developer recognizes the historical significance of the house and in conjunction with this request, is seeking approval of an Historical Landmark Designation. Currently, the single family home has a Potential Local Landmark designation. C. The developer is proposing to remove seven palm trees, one fruit tree, and one Eucalyptus tree in order to accommodate the construction of the proposed residential care facility (Exhibit"K"). As required under the tree preservation ordinance,the developer is required to relocate those trees that can be relocated and'replace those trees with a tree of similar size Item A-23 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, &CUP 99-08-CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS June 9, 1999 Page 3 for those that can not be relocated. Staff has included a condition in the Planning Commission resolution requiring the developer to submit art arborist report to determine the replacement value of the trees to be removed or relocated. D. Appropriateness of the proposed Low Medium Residential Designation• The subject site is located in the middle of a residential neighborhood. The surrounding properties located on the north side of 19th Street have Low-Medium and Medium residential densities. The surrounding properties located on the south side of 19th Street have a Low Residential land use and zoning designation. The subject 5.1 acre parcel is of sufficient size and configuration to accommodate a high-quality residential project,evidenced by the application submitted for the residential care facility. The use of the single family home is contingent upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02,Development District Amendment 99-02,and Landmark Designation 99-02 by the City Council. Additionally,the Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates that a Low-Medium land use designation would be appropriate within a low density area in order to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single family-character of the surrounding residential area. Therefore, adoption of the proposed Low-Medium land use and zoning designation in conjunction with the retirement care facility would meet one of the goals of the General Plan and would be compatible with the surrounding properties. The proposed residential care facility will provide housing for the elderly. E. Appropriateness of the existing Low Residential besi„n�Wo: The subject property could be developed under the current land use and zoning district. The property, however, with the proposed development and land.use change,will provide a greater amount of open space. The maximum lot coverage under the existing land use designation is 40 percent. The proposed site coverage for the project is 23 percent Additionally, should the project be developed under the current land use designation,the removal the existing single family home would be required. The existing home is located in the middle of the property. The developer is proposing to incorporate.the existing single family home into the development. The home will be converted to the club house. Staff, therefore, is in support of the proposed land use and zone change. F. Housing: The only housing issue for the application is the increase in the number of available residential units for the elderly once the project is completed. The more intense land use density would result in an increase in the number of future units;however,theincrease is not considered an adverse impact to the.surrounding properties. Therefore, the proposed land use and zone change would provide greater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the residential neighborhood. G. Design Review Committee: On June 1,1999, the Design Review Committee(Henderson, Stewart, Tolstoy)considered and recommended approval, subject to minor revisions, of the Site Plan and Building Elevations (Exhibit"I'): " H. Environmental Assessment: The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff has ! completed Part 11. Staff has found that there may be a significant noise impact caused by traffic on 19th Street. The General Plan estimates future noise levels in excess of City �I • standards which requires a detailed study of noise reduction mitigation dig measures to be included in the construction design, such as sound barriers or special window glazing. Item A-24 . i PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT I GPA 99.02, DDA 99-02, &CUP 99-08-CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS June 9, 1999 Page 3 for those that can not be relocated, Staff has included a condition in the Planning Commission resolution requiring the developer to submit art arborist report to determine the replacement value of the trees to be removed or relocated. D. Aooropriateness of the proposed Low Medium Residential Designation• The subject site is located in the middle of a residential neighborhood. The surrounding properties located ort the north side of 19th Street have Low-Medium and Medium residential densities. The surrounding properties located on the south side of 19th Street have a Low Residential land use and zoning designation. The subject S.1 acre parcel is of sufficient sae and configuration to accommodate a high-quality residential project evidenced by the application submitted for the residential care facility. The use of the single family home is contingent upon the approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02.Development District Amendment 99.02,and Landmark Designation 99-02 by the City Council. Additionally,the Land Use Element of the General Plan indicates that a Low-Medium land use designation would be appropriate within a low density area in order to encourage greater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the surrounding residential area. Therefore,adoption of the proposed Low-Medium land use and zoning designation in conjunction with the retirement care facility would meet one of the goals of the General Plan and would be compatible with the surrounding properties. The proposed residential care facility will provide housing for the elderly. E. Aooropriateness of the existing_Low Residential "Designation: The subject property could be developed under the current land use and zoning district. The property, however, with the proposed development and land use change,will provide a greater amount of open space. The maximum lot coverage under the existing land use designation is 40 percent. .The proposed site coverage for the project is 23 percent. Additionally, should the project be developed under the current land use designation,the removal the existing single family home would be require!. The existing home is located in the middle of the property. The developer is proposing to incorporate the existing single family home into the development The home will be converted to the dub house. Staff, therefore, is in support of the proposed land use and gone change. F. Housing: The only housing issue for the application is the increase in the number of available residential units for the elderly once the project is completed. The more intense land use density would result in an increase in the number of future units;however,the increase is not considered an adverse impact to the,surrounding.properties. Therefore,the proposed land use and zone change would provide greater housing diversity without changing the single family character of the residential neighborhood. G. Design Review Committee: On June 1,1999,the Design Review Committee(Henderson, Stewart,Tolstoy)considered and recommended approval, subject to minor revisionsL of the_ , Site Plan and Building Elevations(Exhibit"I"); H. Environmental Assessmerrt The applicant completed Part I of the Initial Study and staff has completed Part 11. Staff has found that there maybe a significant noise impact caused by traffic on 19th Street The General Plan estimates future noise levels in excess of City standards which requires a detailed study of noise reduction mitigation measures to be included in the construction design, such as sound barriers or special window glazing. Item A-25 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA 99-02, DDA 99-02, &CUP 9"8-.CURRY BRANDAW ARCHITECTS June 9, 1999 Page 4 Therefore,a condition of approval is recommended to require an acoustical report prior to the issuance of building permits. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate FACTS FOR FINDING: Based upon the facts and conclusions listed above, staff believes the Planning Commission can make the following fads for findings regarding these applications: A. The property is suitable for the,uses,allowed in the proposed land use and development district designation in terms of access and size with similarly designated parcels. B. The proposed amendments would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties as evidenced by the findings and conclusions of the Initial Environmental Study that indicate that no significant impacts would be expelled because of this land use change. C. The'proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan and the Development Code because of the site's capacity to promote the goals and objectives for a residential development. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in thelnland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper,the property was posted,and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council issue a Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment 9902,Development District Amendment 99-02 and Conditional Use Permit 99.08 through adoption of the attached Resolutions. RespecHu ubmitted Brad City Planner Attachments: Exhibit"A" - General Plan Map Exhibit"B" - Development District Map. . . Exhibit"C" - Environmental Initial Study, Part II Exhibit"D" - Site Plan Exhibit."E" -.Grading Plan Exhibit"F" - Landscape Plan Exhibit"G" - Floor Plan Exhibit"H" - Elevations Exhibit"I" - Design Review Committee Action Comments dated June 1, 1999 Exhibit"J" - Pre Application Review Comments dated November 10, 1998 Exhibit"K" - Proposed trees to be removed • Resolution Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment 99-02 Resolution Recommending Approval of Development District Amendment 99-02 Resolution Recommending Approval of Conditional Use Permit 9948 I+-- A 'f G 1 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONCA Staff DATE January 10,2001 TU: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM Brad Buller,City Planner BY: IGrt A.Coury,Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL A ESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 00-33 HIX H E A request to construct an 88 unit, four building, single-story, 43,618 square foot elderly care facility on 2.91 acres of land in the Medium Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of 19th Street,between Amethyst Street and Hellman Avenue—APN: 201-474-04, 05, and 06. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit 00-48 and Preliminary Review 00-07. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Site Characterisft: The site area is generally flat with a slight slope from the northwest comer to the southeast comer. There are presently structures located on the two westerly parcels consisting of one detached garage and two single-family residences built in 1953. The identified structures are proposed to be demolished. B. Surroundina Land Use and Zonina. North - Senior Apartments;High Residential(24-30 dwelling units per acre) South - Single Family Homes;Low Residential(2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Proposed elementary school/day care facility; Medium Residential (8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Town-Home Development; Medium Residential(8-14 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Desk Inatlons. Project Site - Medium Residential(8-14 dwelling units per acre) North - High Residential(24-30 dwelling units per acre) South - Low Residential(2-4 dwelling units per acre) East - Medium Residential(8-14 dwelling units per acre) West - Medium Residential(8-14 dwelling units per acre) D. Parking Calculations: Number of Number of Type Number Parking Spaces Spaces Of Use of Beds - Ratio Required Provided ® Assisted Living 86 1/4 beds 22 40 Item A-27 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 00-33—HIX HOMES January 10,2001 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The site is partially developed(the two westerly parcels consisting of one detached garage and two single-family residences)with native trees and grasses present. Four mature Palm trees exist on the property and are designated to be relocated on-site and incorporated into the Landscape Plan. To the north of the property Is a senior apartment oomplek and to the south(across 19th Street) is a residential subdivision. East of the property is a proposed private elementary school/daycare facility, and to the west, is an existing town home development. The project will be developed in two phases on two equal lots. Phase II will be a mirrored image of Phase I.with a driveway and parking area centered between the two phases. Each phase will include two single-story buildings of 21,809 square feet. The facility is designed for elderly individuals, most of which are at least 80 years okL The facility is not an apartment or independent living facility. The facility will provide the residents with full assistance in the dally activities of living including bathing, dressing,.grooming, and eating. The facility will be licensed by the State of California for such purposes. Project amenities in each phase will include a dining area, living room area with aviary and piano, recreationlarts and crafts area, library, laundry facilities, beauty salon/barber shop, full centralized kitchen, office space, and storage area for extra furniture and equipment An activities director will be available to pian and organize hobbies, demonstrations,and off-site shopping excursions in the facility van. There is ample outdoor area for exercise,an outdoor central landscaped courtyard area which Is completely surrounded by a covered walkway. Furnished with benches and patio furniture,there are also a number of large covered areas available for outdoor seating away from direct sunlight. Areas will be available in the central courtyard for residents to tend to small flower gardens,and enjoy a putting green.-Residents in the facility will be ambulatory. The buildings will include a stucco finish with IS Dorado' stacked stone treatment and a 'shake blend' concrete the roof (Exhibit 'F'). The project will be surrounded with a 6-foot high slump-stone wall on the north,east,and west sides,with wrought iron and stacked stone column returns on the south(19th Street)side. Access to the site is provided by a drive-approach located on the north side d 19th Street. The surrounding neighbors have raised conoerrts regarding traffic impacts by the proposed project. The City has several existing senior housing projects, which have been found to generate less traffic than other uses which could otherwise occupy the site (i.e. multiple- family residential). The seniors who live in this type of project do not generally own a vehicle and no longer drive. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant, prior to issuance of building permits. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. Lastly, the projed is required to comply with standard conditions of approval for provision of adequate ingress/egress from the site, and 40 employeeMehodresident panting spaces are provided on-site. Sufficient parking is provided in proximity to the proposed building. B. Desion Review Committee: The Committee (McNeil, Stewart and Coleman) reviewed the project on December 5, 2000, and recommended approval with conditions, which have been incorporated into the attached.Resolution of Approval. Action comments have been attached for your convenience(Exhibit'G'). I 1 Itam 4-7_S PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 00-33—HIX HOMES January 10,2001. Page 3 C. Technical and Grading Review Committees: The Grading Committee reviewed the project on December 5, and December 19, 2000. The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on December 6, 2000. Both Committees recommended approval of the project subject to conditions contained in the attached Resolution of Approval. D. Environmental Assessment: The Initial Study has been completed. Staff determined that the project could have significant adverse environmental impacts on short-term air quality and noise levels during site preparation, such as grading and equipment exhaust, and biological resources because of tree removal. Mitigation measures will be required to reduce the short- term air quality and noise impacts to a less than significant impact,and to preserve the Palm trees by relocating on-site. If the Planning Commission concurs, then the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration would be in order. E. Neiahbofiood Meeting; A neighborhood meeting was held on November 27, 2000. Surrounding property owners were notified of the meeting, and two people attended the meeting. The neighbors asked general questions relating to the proposed development and expressed concerns regarding traffic impacts. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted,and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 300-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Conditional Use Permit 00-33 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions and the issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner BB:KC:mlg Attachments: Exhibit'A' - Project Description Exhibit'B' - Site Utilization Map Exhibit'C' - Site Plan Exhibit'D* - Grading Plan Exhibit'E' - Landscape Plan Exhibit*F' - Elevations Exhibit'G' - Design Review Committee Comments dated December 5,2900 Exhibit'H' - Initial Study Resolution of Approval with Conditions i Item A-2q J • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF ;CHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 23, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL To ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell_ Vice Chairman Fletcher Munoz— Wimberly_ Oaxaca II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the genera1 public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission; riot to the members of tTie� audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA m APRIL 23, 2014 `�"O� Page 2 III. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS A. UPDATE ON WEST-SIDE AND SPECIAL LIGHTING DISTRICTS IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION' B. Approval of minutes dated March 26, 2013 V.. . PUBLIC HEARINGS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. C. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00206-DENNIS MYSKOW-A request for a historic landmark designation for a single-family residence in the General Industrial District located at 8803 Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-271-40. The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. D. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 - KB HOME - A review of a proposal for 76 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 76-lot subdivision of about 53 acres in the Very Low(VL)Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-.2.10) - _ =15;and"=20.'Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. On November 9, 2011 a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. 1 w AHISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA P.MCHWO APRIL 23, 2014 C"C"ON`A Page 3 VII. COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION VIII. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission will immediately adjourn to a Workshop to discuss Pre- Application Review®RC2014-00136. The workshop will be held in the Rains Room. • 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true,accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 17, 2014,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name4or the-record and- speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. C. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA APRIL 23, 2014 tli=°N`� Page 4 Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us i VicinityMap Historic• Preservation and Planning Comm 'ssE 'ioon Meetng� April 23, 2014 L1IJ- I C L o E0 "L i - E r C6 V Y Q = Z Jul!1 y I c o g 19 Sty Q Base Line , Baso Line Church � Church Foothill N P c = Foothill o ` l Arrowc E w w 0 0 Arrow 41 Jt rsey 8th o W a w a+ stn' o stn w C 4th � . . 4th ® * Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Clvlc Center Drive A: Update on West-Side and Special Lighting Districts 19 B: Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes of March 26, 2014 Iteirn C: Historic Landmark Designation DRC2014-00206 Item D: Development Review DRC2013-00743 ORAL UPDATE ON WEST-SIDE AND SPECIAL ® LIGHTING DISTRICTS Item A THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF RAWCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 26, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I..: CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Howdyshell X Vice Chairman Fletcher X Munoz A Wimberly X Oaxaca X It was noted that Commissioner Munoz'absence is excused for medical reasons. Additional Staff Present. Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development,Steven Flower,Assistant CityAttorney,Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner, Rebecca Fuller, Administrative Secretary; Betty Miller, Senior Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary F.. II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are-to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed-necessary'by.jhe`Chair;" depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which • might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Item B-1 a! HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES CHO MARCH 26, 2014 C4 Page 2 Mary Linden McKee spoke regarding the flood history of storm discharge in our area. She expressed concern about the possibility of extreme flood discharge and questioned our preparedness for such an event. III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated February 26, 2014 Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, adopted 4-0-1 (Munoz absent) B. Approval of Workshop Minutes dated February 26, 2014 Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Oaxaca, adopted 4-0-1 (Munoz absent) [_ IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION 71 The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to deceive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. C. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00508-CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING-A design review of building elevations and detailed site plan for the development of a 126-room hotel and a site plan for a 3,000 square foot office pad within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and Haven Avenue-APN: 0210-081- 13. Related File: Tentative Parcel Map 19474. A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. An Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. D. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19474-CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING-A request to create two parcels of land from one existing 2.97 acre parcel located within the Industrial Park District within the Haven Overlay located at the southeast comer of 6th Street and Haven Avenue-APN:0210-081-13. Related File: Development Review DRC2013-00508. - - - - - A Mitigated Negative Declaration for DRC2007-00542 was adopted by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2008. An Addendum to the adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project for consideration. Steve Fowler gave the staff report and a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) and thoroughly reviewed the proposed plans. He noted that Grading conditions have been Item B-2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 26, 2014 C 4 Page 3 added to the draft resolutions and copies of the new conditions have been placed before the Commissioners on the dais for consideration. Commissioner Wimberly confirmed the only change to the mitigations covered by the addendum is the frequency of watering the site during construction. Mr. Fowler said it was just a matter of increasing the water to keep particulate matter from going to other properties. Chairman Howdyshell said she was not clear about the breakfast area and an outdoor barbeque facilities. Mr. Fowler said there is no restaurant on site and barbeques are provided for the guests' use. He indicated the applicant could elaborate. Chairman Howdyshell opened the public hearing. • Charlie Buquet 7375 Day Creek Boulevard, Suites 103-198, Rancho Cucamonga, 91739, said this new plan offers an opportunity for an office pad as well as the operation of the Residence Inn. He said it will have a continental breakfast type of offering. The project includes an additional driveway, street improvements, and quality design. He offered thanks to staff for their help and guidance from the DRC. He noted they will be connecting to the City utility. Vice Chairman Fletcher said his only concern is about the color of the building noting that although the various renderings appear differently;he does not care for the mustard color. Mr. Fowler passed around the color sample for clarification. Chairman Howdyshell closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Fletcher said it is a good product with a compatible design with the Haven Overlay. He said if the color is neutral, it will be fine. Commissioner Wimberly said it is a fantastic project and he believes that it surpasses what came forward from the prior approval. He said the Inn also provides employment opportunity. _- - - Com-,-mmissioner'(iaxaca echoed the prior comments. He said it was a successful process and he appreciates the applicants'willingness to think outside the box and propose different and unique materials and to meet us halfway with a contemporary and urban project. He said the whole combination works. i Item B-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 26, 2014 ` Page 4 Chairman Howdyshell concurred. She said she is excited about the potential. She said she loves the corner treatments on the buildings, the architectural design, and noted the ideal location. Moved by Wimberly, seconded by Fletcher, adopted 4-0-1 (Munoz absent) to adopt Resolutions 14-12 and 14-13 for Design Review DRC2013-00508 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19474 and to adopt the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration as presented by staff. E COMMISSION CONCERNS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION None VI. ADJOURNMENT 7:40 PM If you need special assistance or accommodations to participat=meefii.ng, ,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750.hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonablensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the he INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your"pbsition,'you' T may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. Item B-4 f HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES G' JIM� MARCH 26, 2014 Page 5 It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday,7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. ® APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us Item B-5 STAFF REPORT - PUNNING DEPARTMENT RANCHO Date: April 23, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner Subject: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00206 - DENNIS MYSKOW - A request for a historic landmark designation for a single-family residence within the General Industrial District, located at 8803 Baker Avenue - APN: 0207-271-40. The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. This item will be forwarded to City Council for final action. BACKGROUND A. Historical Significance: The subject structure, located at 8803 Baker Avenue, was built in the late 1940s or early 1950s and is considered to be built in the Folk Architecture style. The structure is constructed of recycled and/or salvaged materials ranging from deeply textured paving stones, telephone poles, and native rocks. The telephone poles run all through the • house to act as a support for the roofing. The backyard is outlined by a wall constructed of remnants of rubble and rock placed in various configurations. The structure retains most of its original material. The garage that sits on the southern portion of the site was built at a later date. Towards the northerly portion of the main structure, an addition was also constructed. Both later additions were completed by the current owner. The house is believed to be built by Polish immigrant Konstanty "Steve" Stys. Originally from . Poland, he immigrated to the United States and settled in Youngstown, Ohio before moving to California in 1921. He lived in Pomona, then he moved to Claremont, and finally to Cucamonga in 1946. He is perhaps most known for his affiliation with the Russian Village in Claremont. He was a rock craftsman of the area who put a lot of character into his work. The Russian Village encompasses a group of 15 homes lining Mills Avenue that were built of recycled and/or salvaged materials during the Great Depression. In 1923, Stys purchased the eastern side of Mills Avenue. He then sold lots to friends and needy families and helped them find building materials from wrecking yards, earthquake-damaged buildings from the 1933 earthquake, and local field stones from the alluvial plain around the City of Claremont. The homes are unified by their use of rock and street rubble as exterior materials such as telephone poles, chunks of pavement, sides from railroad cars, red-tile roofs, and the informal arrangement of each property. Local residents nicknamed the neighborhood "Russian Village," assuming that Stys came from Russia. This neighborhood was placed on the National Register of Historic Places as a prime example of folk architecture. It was the hard times of the Great Depression that helped create this sense of-community in these - houses. The use of salvaged materials was an economic way to build houses. Stys is also known for designing and constructing the structure located at 8649 9th Street in Rancho Cucamonga, which is currently the Cask and Cleaver restaurant. This was Stys' Item C— 1 c , HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00206-DENNIS MYSKOW April 23, 2014 Page 2 home until his death in 1961. The Cask and Cleaver building was built approximately in the late 1940s. B. Ownership History: According to the City directory from 1950 to 1967, Jason and Jenny Carwell were listed as the owners (the original address was 158 Baker Avenue). According to the San Bernardino County Assessor's information, the previous owners were Charles and Donna Lescault. In 1973, the current owners, the Myskows, acquired the property. A real estate agent informed them that the building was built by Mr. Stys. It is possible that the structure was built about the same time as the Cask and Cleaver building, since it was in such close proximity and because it follows his move to the Cucamonga area in 1946. There are no building records that show the actual date of construction for the structure located at 8803 Baker Avenue, but historic aerials reveal that there was something on the site in 1938, and a definitive structure could be identified by 1959 (Exhibit B). C. Site Characteristics: The project site is on an L-shaped parcel (approximately 0.5 acres), located approximately 500 feet north of 8th Street. The lot is zoned General Industrial and the single-family residence is considered a legal non-conforming use. Properties to the north are zoned Industrial Park;. to the east and south is General Industrial; to the west is zoned Low Residential. It is generally surrounded by vacant land with the exception of a residential development just west of the site and a separate parcel just south of the property where there exists another legal non-conforming residence. ANALYSIS A. General: The house was never identified in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2009 historic survey results, performed by Chattel Architecture, nor the previous City surveys conducted throughout the years. That does not preclude properties that might have been missed by these surveys. Based on a field visit to the project site and also to the "Russian Village," the construction methods and materials are very similar with the use of deeply textured paving stones, telephone poles, and native rocks. Although there is no written documentation stating that this was built by Mr. Stys, the construction methods and materials are so unique that staff has concluded that it must have been built by the same person or his apprentice. According to the National Register of Historic Places Inventory, "Lay-More Tile" was a business owned and operated by. Stys and his friend, Merle Mead. The tile itself is a dry, self-stacking, concrete block that appears in a number of the structures in Russian Village and also appears on the subject structure. B. Landmark Designation: The subject site qualifies for landmark designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as historical and cultural significance and integrity. Details related to these areas of significance are contained in the Facts for Findings Section. The purpose of the designation is to preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate a significant feature that contributes to the cultural and aesthetic benefit of Rancho Cucamonga. C. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. Item C— 2 J HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00206-DENNIS MYSKOW April 23, 2014 Page 3 FACTS FOR FINDING: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: It is or was once associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. Fact/s: The property is an example of early life during a time where resources were scarce after the Great Depression. Findinq 2: It is or was once associated with persons important to local, California, or- national history. Fact/s: The property is associated with Konstanty Stys, an important person to local history. Finding 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. Facts: The dwelling is a good example of Folk Architecture during the Great Depression era. Its method of construction is especially unique in that the builder utilized recycled and salvaged materials. • Finding 4: It represents the work of a master, possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. Facts: Konstanty Stys was known for his . unique craftsmanship, also cited in "Judy Wright's Claremont: A Pictorial History" as "vernacular, anonymous, spontaneous, indigenous, or rural" architecture. Finding 5: It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Facts: The structure and property has potential to yield information about the Great Depression era and the local area. B. Integrity: Finding 1: Historic Landmarks must retain integrity from their period of significance with respect to location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association, or any combination of these factors. A proposed landmark need not retain all such original aspects, but must retain sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. Neither the deferred maintenance of a proposed landmark nor its dilapidated condition shall, on its own, be equated with a. loss of integrity. Integrity shall be judged with reference to the particular., characteristics that support the property's eligibility. Item C—3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00206-DENNIS MYSKOW April 23, 2014 Page 4 Fact/s: The proposed landmark retains integrity from thep period of significance with respect to location, design, materials, workmanship, and association. It retains sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Landmark Designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet of the project site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval of Landmark Designation DRC2014-00206 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action: Respectfully s bmitted, Candyce eft Planning Manager CB:MN/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location map Exhibit B - Historic aerials Exhibit C - Photographs Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2014-00206 Item C—4 •- JU i Yk ► '� . r 441 a .. � !'-. _`.� l�r _ ... � 1 � �7 .r. �•� - _',oT`_ wi .0-.SSG b �- 9 wall co ko 40 ZzMtn +� 411 �rr►rre�M$r i111F1►r► FE� G �f x W - ...M .ani.♦... • w, • p .. f 4 a : a w w w rt m R y a@ • V 0 $ t 4 4 0 a !' s.3 y N® .4 at 0 a as #i44e1Y r --4 $4 3 ro4 ♦ 164446440 $ _ -40 A t t 4 04,40 16 � + r� .mow sa # t4 v v w as At d4 4 • s Ad4k't.4aa ♦ox a s b as++ 'gam e4. AIR ky ## tt 464 ♦4►os „o-4 # .� 1�64F r'B # � 2»v�* # �i�, + # • # s1• a a�,. .. «.... *#mm - iY m-4 rt• 4 a 'h v -gyp :.. � 41 ##� ♦ #tib sgs B a4 *4 s —4 t s# v�ar46 4% 1 4 ft 4 a. y " $ 4 v 4 `M $f+ .4>•. �4'L .0 •^►� ".� b # -x• 4a 14ffit f k. w � s 416 ► u. � �'f � �s $ ba. p� S ga•� A �. •b A.4� a �� '^� # -k .�.t�. aF .p` M + y;� a4s. a= -a�'at vp 4•y. ewaB s» ;.+:. . . S �* m4* s � 3 + . tt #`� � . mm#a z � s +6.�.. .�. ',• tea.. Aw 8. . tO 10 y �� . �,• �4 wspgr g 4 r a6 *.» s a$ Alt "� ��'*'� as!4 �'#!F 4g.4�•�. .► «.� e.# �¢b 4 +,�se � xx, Ap tv a i Al # b x..� w 4 w-vw -. a ♦ 7r •`•►� ti 4 �' 1♦"��'tlr-s sit *+ .. � Y•• W. •Si'•^i •t.- a. J+a,� x.►w.y-�,... ►r *s♦ a*•M 1' `w "w ~ r •( a y, .p„ t.. •- ;1 i *a -i s.. ...r vw.. +-r,r.O�..�,y... ♦..t °. r ! ;►+� �^f i it 9'4"• a-��; let.. • s a ,.r.►= r+ "�s^s�-.•�+►ids«y 4-9-Ir �, !�, �iy. ja ja ri (1 . f'�►-1 4 f r *[ a d '�1•rfr i•ti y..• is•s��i' '� t..�7•�, j+-•`'} (y•1 sir{}+: F � ".�'a -"`'Y'.- � �` • *i { . ... . . .... ` ; '*'* y M-"L w".+.•. $•> • y .• '"1'-?'!i!YI 1.�.� .•�,� �f`.. �«J '" °'^'°r'" A i 'y '♦R� ^k_►• *M�{,-�+L.r . ; 4{syr--• �!.{.e.. a .r . •�h♦f'tM'Y {•.+ L�/y�y:� i+ ���.! r ^ • �". ���� . Y_ ur. �.�.,r w f frwrr•v• fir.....>.,,_. ...f. yy..,, .i• ►♦�,r�r{ �i.2_► ♦-► �1it � f iQQ�, ! i.:r a♦ t v .i C ,£r j .• � aw*--•..:...... x.... ..♦ ��{�F.M!•iF'-! +e•rl•F�«+� '•�"•�,at1F•'/l.�'T�`...,y'K4.�AF.rr� qI��;t . = .j-♦ ..� ��`_Qi •�M••'++rr��Mr► •' Jt' .Fk..•i . J'R,• y. Jr 9c Cut � � MIR •rF t = . -. - . Aq lK Fla rr-F l�.r�ri>•r.i • �e.,•�;+,L-...aia. •* _ *'voiF"�•>w -' � R. ".'*.•'r1/�r"r•.'}'�'•,� 4 f' "sp ._1 1 • • 4.•'4•• ♦ sgi {, .. „_ .. 1� .• a � FgT`1'i.:a„-' r t^ s...wrb +. v • .. R r.+J r. S • p +.. - ! ♦ •.n 1959 94 =516 47 as5i356Td36933nas7���4' AM a sag xit s .. _ , aaa # .; a to ass�esu�,4a a i + �, ! olae $ lw r y el pro- 00 a I. f M s 8468 47! 848E a4 4 a4Ta �, � III ! Y' c. £✓ • R «'s ..»�t�, � < � •�' d> •i V } t ai93 x � w rM aeon t � IN �;� � .�� � �, ��� �� t.•�� � ��._., lie f L � _ y 4 s. t • . 1 y zto i 7 r �r +t. . i p Window ' •e ww, Garage ir� - f f� t J a 1 i E ` Rock workbackyard • ''�� `` '�, 1 1 �I• Ivy View r rA'• •� 1 I •�•♦ I,sc.y� 1 1 N 1 fit, looking northwest � f ``i .s. 5 y•. _ uy ,k rt a i �� •d•�1.iV , i ~��� �- i ria s..• ._..•R'. `�.`� • ,h Rt. ��� wy�' � •1h � s� - � 4+sP f1` . w SAN GABRIELI Coo Angeles dimes _ Thursday,June 16, 1988 ,They built [the houses] with the materials available. It was really a classic An ,c i � '►r L t rf ,r ,r ,a 4 t Louise Nelson walks in garden of her horns on Sbuth Mille Avenue,a one-time rural road that has become one of Clan Russian Village Built of Rubble in the Depression, Houses Are Now Claremont's Pride Av JEFFREY MILLER,Times Staff Writer One might think that prospeeuve home- The key figure in the story of Rtmlan owners would be less than thniled to team Village is Kormtany Stys,a Polish imml- that their dream house was designed and grant who came to the ares in the early constructed by untrained laborers using 1920s from Youngstown, Ohio, where he chunks of pavement. .r; had been a steel worker. telephone poles and Although he didn't odds and ends scanhave much money,for- enged from condemned mal education or experi- 11011dings r' Ince in housing design. But to residents of Stye created a neigh- Russian Village-15 borhood of hand-crafted • c�- houses built along South - + homes that has been Stills Avenue in mchMied on the National r• K ,1 Clare- mont dunng the Great r C_Y'IaTS Register of Historic t Depression by poor im- Places as a definitive h nugrantworkers—These J example of"folk archi- humble origins are a .? q.!1 lecture" -::• i xiurceof pride. + M' _ I, Attracted by the con. 4 r You list devrlup:ral " J I trruction work available aspect and dfectinn for '•_ r I at the nearby Claremont -i i en o plot of lanamong the �nowiss as he admired A t« citrus groves of south .tile. walls of his home, -� +.��•` Claremont. In seeking which was constructedbuilding materials, Stys with more than 2.500 Konstany Stys at work. 1931 needed to look no far- r concrete hb cks that .her than the large piles y (t•. ,vere chiseled from street rubble of ux ks that had been cleared from the + "They were very pour people," added surrounding land to make it arable. Snowi.".a prnfessor of political science it Using those rocks, along with larger CCL.A "The Depression lust wiped them boulders hauled down from the mountains OUL They built ithe houses) with the ,nd<urplus lumber from construction sites matrnaie available. L Under the lash of at the colleges,Stys built a modest house m necessity they could do it. It was really a 1922 that established the vllldge's rocky. Leo SnOWiss' living room has ac c lassie Arnencan story' Please see VILLAGE.Page 4 1 Itpm C- 17 IlturstWy,June 16, VM SGV a hit i Ludo P of ALR ha i >n8 beams WW stairway in Jeanne lar: an.stands by the home of Jos end Gsor9iwn. m vt6re's triplex are made of telephone poles.top. Will, the second built by Komtarry Stys.Sty* Clerarront Mayo Judy Wright,a local histon txult a shrine in the chimney of enother horns. VILLAGE: Houses of Rubble Gsillow"(nin tap t story is that wighbon mistook TvUun nR the houses historic fla- y Styx, accent is being Kuniaa tures exterior alters- Ath It. Others say that Borne Claremont Although � tial from the At the onset of the f)rpr wn. residents at the time perceived a bats requt approval Styr subdivided his land and sold hint of Iloiahevurn in the coopera- city maintenanceof the homes parcels under generous terms W Community estabiiaiCo live cowf by the historical character is largely or Ronda, relatives and co-workers ::ve anl worker the horror system- Some reskWnir who had been left destitute.Mat- even collect blocks of street rubbl, gage payments—not always cril- With one notable exception,the with which to build additions Iccled—were as low as S5 a month. homes w'ert I:titit w tifrwt blue their houses Stys lent tome buyers his labor and prints,accounting for x,rne unique Mere see V ILT AM Pager hie knack for obtaining low-cost floor plans.-tending ides gn was building materials. dictated by available supplies and Stye'neighbors copied his archi- the needs of growing farmlies. r' tectund style,more out of financial -Mese houety are all different," ,necessity than aesthetic coasisten- said Snowiss,whose home features Sty,VnW*most of the houses were an exposed-cream ceiling made of .gttt�t watt the pleotdul field stones, surplus lumber hewn with an ax- }bo teed pavement from like tool called an ods bx Stye and aged Weets and red �tg4soji Ater esti Brno from tbit. a likb, ��li'�'" . Ii�+;rl(t'� ty}gke. 0 were obi iMpied adH'�F�r trbm a 3�`ir� 7q •; baa trot Owtd 10W,d& Item C- 18 VULAGE: Untrained _-�_ . �� Builders' Work Lasts -74 Caatlnued from page 4 f Stys, who died in 1%. 1, built 10 garage was the first house built by ` Stys, admits the traffic an be i} homes elsewhere In his trademark bothersome, gut standing in her rock-and�Rbble style. The largest of these; In Rancho Cucamonga, front front yard, a few feet from two J i n ` later"became the first Cask g pines planted as Christ- ]A Craver restaurant.Stys'wife.An- mas trees by the Stys children tonina, lived in an artist's studio more than 60 years ago, Will said that Stys built near the restaurant the village's unique quality of life until she moved to 'Northern Cali_ more than compensates. forma earlier this year. "We love it here." she said. R'aeh of the individually styled "These homes all have character. houses in Russian Village seems to It's really interesting to live in a have its own materials,history and Place with a history like this." ~ anecdotes. Seven-gabled house built in 1933 by Garret Bateli There is the European-style _ cou4try home with seven steeply p)iched gables, built in 1933 by Ga 'et13stelaan, a 2I-year-old 10 had taken correspondence In-bad try,plumbing and had never actually built first effort ha$held up . ) d 91Yd admonition that s goof was structurally 4.. Ttd wouldcoltapse. t- en t is the hones built in 9 d ft �dri•33tan. ~ tuts�'{•it,, no netructiort evetience, le Wit-yoursei!'msir�L to i ld` U►SS dome, using mmol& as �flroad ties and ofl cane ed.With gement. fhe waN were made fro gp pf rot•I.-Crete oriipnally used to eNolt Poalevam,Purrhasedfor eling4argt,of 135. The roof. a. condemned school ldmg i lcndhra,cost$120,The hard-Paid 18$,3.75 for the lot *Mding materials. e. expensive house in the t $8.000 to build #dome that was.builtin sold for 119g M, cit home in the nePgh- fa a,iriplex that S.tya bpi eoconitijo�late his eaten includi married Taws. Phe'home o� ✓' - three separtt�d y� . hed to a 4common ilk e home featured les GrG and: a d-fife root'from i e th- e-damaged Long' J dry. Telephones- poup we the' d, structure's support Dear►ts' I!d its stairway. "i like-the style of it," said c L"ariviere, who bought the fI Years ago and rents.out if i },units. ,It,s ►gore,like ?u're Iti ft.in the countt3+`�v}iAn ou live in•9ris" y tl5age. r Item C— 19 RESOLUTION NO. 14-01 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00206, DESIGNATING THE PROPERTY A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 8803 BAKER AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 0207-271-40. A. Recitals. 1. Dennis Myskow filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Landmark is referred to as"the application." 2. On April 23, 2014, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby found,determined,and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part'A"of this Resolution are true and correct. • 2. The application applies to approximately 0.5 acre of land, basically an L-shaped configuration, located at 8803 Baker Avenue. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on April 23,2014, including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 17.18.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: It is or was once associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. Fact/s: The property is an example of early life during a time where resources were scarce after the Great Depression. Finding 2: It is or was once associated with persons important to local, California, or national history. Facts: The property is associated with Konstanty Stys, an important-person to local history. Finding 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type,period,or method • of construction. Item C— 20 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-01 DRC2014-00206—DENNIS MYSKOW April 23, 2014 Page 2 Facts: The dwelling is a good example of Folk Architecture during the Depression era. Its method of construction is especially unique in that the builder utilized recycled and salvaged materials. Finding 4: It represents the work of a master, possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. Facts: Konstanty Stys was known for his unique craftsmanship,also cited in "Judy Wright's Claremont: A Pictorial History" as "vernacular, anonymous, spontaneous, indigenous;or rural" architecture. Finding 5: It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Facts: The structure and property has potential to yield information about the Depression era and the local area. B. Integrity Findinq 1: Historic Landmarks must retain integrity from their period of significance with respect to location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association, or any combination of these factors. A proposed landmark need not retain all such original aspects, but must retain sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. Neither the deferred maintenance of a proposed landmark nor its dilapidated condition shall,on its own,be equated with a loss of integrity. Integrity shall be judged with reference to the particular characteristics that support the property's eligibility. Facts: The proposed landmark retains integrity from their period of significance with respect to location,design,materials,workmanship, and association. It retains sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The Commission finds that this Landmark Designation is exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that, pursuant to Section 17.18.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal-Code;the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of RanchoCucamongaheretfy recommends approval of Landmark Designation on the 23rd day of April, 2014. Itam r— 71 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-01 DRC2014-00206—DENNIS MYSKOW April 23, 2014 ® Page 3 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2014. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francis Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 23rd day of April 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: • AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: • Item C—22 r STAFF REPORT PLANN ING D>EPARTMnvr Date: April 23, 2014 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Manager By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 - KB HOME - A review of a proposal for 76 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 76-lot subdivision of about 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) - APNs: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. On November 9, 2011, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Development Review DRC2013-00743 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences; Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South- Access road for San Bernardino Flood Control District and Foothill Freeway (SR-210) East - Vacant; Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single-Family Residences (Part) and Vacant (Part); Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South- n/a East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential C. Background: A tentative tract map for the purpose of subdividing the property into seventy-six (76) lots for single-family residential development, filed by Chaffey Joint Union High School District, was approved for this project site by the Planning Commission on November 9, 2011 (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122). The recording of the final map is pending. The property has since been sold to KB Home for the development/construction of the homes. • Item D-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743—KB HOME April 23, 2014 Page 2 D. Site Characteristics: The project site consists of five (5) parcels located on the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) (Exhibit B). The project site has an overall area of approximately 2.4 million square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north, there are single-family residences, including recently constructed single-family residences within Tract 17651. To the west of the project site, are single-family residences and a single, vacant parcel. To the south, is a vacant parcel owned by Caltrans and used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this parcel is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210). The properties to the east are vacant. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast comers are approximately 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot of the above-noted subdivision for a total of seventy-six (76) single-family residences. The floor areas of the houses will range between 3,381 square feet (Plan 1) to 4,506 square feet (Plan 4). Thirty- eight (38) of the houses will be one-story, while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two- story. This equates to 50 percent of the lots having single-story houses. This mix of one- and two- story homes is consistent with the policy adopted by the Planning Commission requiring that 25 percent (minimum) of the proposed houses be single-story. The garages of sixty-four (64) of the houses (60.6 percent of the total number of proposed houses) will be setback from the front part of the house or will not face towards the street, i.e., they are "side entry° garages. This will comply with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan that requires 50 percent of the garages to be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes its visual presence (as seen from the street). The houses on all corner lots (Lots 1, 17, 20 through 23, 28, 29, 40, 41, 52, 53, 64, 65, and 76) will be single-story as required per Section 5.42.608 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in Section 5.42.600 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant proposes four (4) types of architectural themes (elevations) — Spanish, Colonial, Cottage, and Farmhouse. Each house will incorporate a variety of materials to varying degrees. Depending on the theme, the Colonial, Cottage, and Farmhouse will have a combination of stone veneer, board and batt siding, lap siding, and stucco finish. Due to the nature of the theme, the Spanish elevation will be exclusively finished with stucco. Roofing will be either flat or barrel concrete tile. Each house will have an articulated footprint/floor plan and profile. The applicant proposes four(4) distinct footprints — Plans 1, 2, 2x, 3, and 4 — and reverse footprints-of each-for a total of (10) footprints. Plans 1, 2, and 2x will be one-story, while the others will be two-story. The number of available footprints will comply with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Because the footprints and profiles of each house differ, there will be a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines. Each house will have a front entrance comprised of either an enclosed courtyard or Item D-2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743—KB HOME • April 23, 2014 Page 3 a covered porch. Potential homeowners have the option of a casita attached to the house (Plan 2x). Depending on the theme, there will also.be details such as wood brackets/rafter tails at the roof eaves, decorative trim and shutters around the windows, wrought iron accent features, corbels, molding along the top of the stone veneer wainscots, wood shingle siding, and decorative garage doors. Chimneys are not proposed. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. That meeting was held at Etiwanda High School at 9161 Base Line Road on October 16, 2009. Another meeting for the subject application was conducted for the same purpose at Etiwanda Colony Elementary School, located at 13144 Banyan Street on January 29, 2014. As with the tentative tract map, none of the participants in attendance had any objections to this part of the project, i.e. the architecture of the homes. Most questions were about the final status of the existing trees, and the design and alignments of the proposed walls and trails. Staff and the applicant were able to address these questions to the satisfaction of the attendees. The principal concerns presented were in relation to the increased traffic volume generated by the project that would pass through neighboring streets. There were also concerns regarding the design of, and traffic control (stop signs, signalization, etc.) at, the intersection of East Avenue and the proposed street near Lots 1 and 76. Staff indicated that the traffic-related issues were analyzed during the review of the tentative tract map, and it was determined that the traffic volumes were expected to be within acceptable levels and that the street intersection complied with City • standards. C. Gradinq and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and Miller) and Technical Review Committee reviewed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 on December 15, 2009. All of the grading and technical aspects of the overall project were analyzed at that time. The Committees accepted the proposal and their conditions of approval were subsequently incorporated into the Resolution of Approval for the tentative tract map (Resolution No. 11-56). Although the subject application is limited to a review of the architecture of the proposed homes, details that could impact the Grading Plan have now been firmly established. Therefore, to ensure that the grading and technical aspects of the project are still in compliance with the City's standards/guidelines within the context of potential revisions (changes to pad elevations, pad locations, flow lines, etc.) to accommodate the proposed homes, an additional review by these Committees occurred on January 28, 2014. Revisions/corrections were requested by the Committee and, following the completion of those revisions/corrections, the proposal was reviewed again by the Committee on March 4, 2014. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommended approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. D. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Nicholson) reviewed Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 on December 15, 2009. The Committee accepted the subdivision layout as proposed and their conditions of approval were subsequently incorporated into the Resolution of Approval for the tentative tract map (Resolution No. 11-56). On -January-28, 2014,-the Design Review Committee reviewed the subject-application,(Exhibit-I)..<-.The Committee generally accepted the proposal as submitted with some exceptions. They directed the applicant to revise the Spanish Colonial themed elevations so that they incorporated more features that are characteristic of Spanish Colonial architecture. The features that were requested include ® arched and/or recessed windows, shutters with curved top edges that match the corresponding Item D-3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743—KB HOME April 23, 2014 Page 4 arched window, and arched trim above the garage doors. The Committee requested that the stackstone veneer be comprised of blocks that were thicker, i.e. the vertical dimension of each stack should be increased. Also, the Committee requested that the applicant vary the type of rock veneers on the Craftsman themed elevations. The applicant subsequently revised the architecture and submitted the proposal for a follow-up review by the Committee at a meeting held on March 4, 2014 (Exhibit J). The Committee reviewed the revised architecture and recommended approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed Tentative Tract Map SUB71718122 on December 9, 2009, and September 8, 2010. All of the design and technical aspects of the trail were analyzed at that time. The Committee accepted the proposal and recommended approval. As this application is limited to a review of the architecture of the proposed homes, an additional review by this Committee of this application was determined to be not necessary. F. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQK) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 9, 2011, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. .No substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less-than-significant. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received. Respectfully submitted, 1 Candyc Burnett Plannin Manager CB:MS/ge Item D-4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743—KB HOME • April 23, 2014 Page 5 Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Site Plan Exhibit E - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 (for reference only) Exhibit F - Conceptual Precise Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit G - Floor Plans and Elevations Exhibit H - Landscape Plans (typical) Exhibit I - Design Review Committee Action Comments (January 28, 2014) Exhibit J - Design Review Committee Action Comments (March 4, 2014) Exhibit K - Figure 5-2 (Etiwanda Specific Plan) Exhibit L - Staff Report (without exhibits) and Resolution of Approval No. 11-56 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Draft Resolution of Approval for Development Review DRC2013-00743 Item D-5 NORTH RM WAV � •yl'S;. It SKwRjwG Y$RD ir YU Srt RO�� 'S ��� e.. E� fYf�� .,t✓NII♦ G %O@CRE6L DP- .f.01AEN"5i O i f PRAIRIE OR _ GwENDaByo m. t RIOWRID 81 �a �OpaD OR a' J9 al.< �. e CARAN,KNOLLS 8LACKStONEDR !� DR g 3 a S f MaWIAWASHE'I TDAICT 'AIL. AO ;u YL 1• G d 9 WILSON AVE OWMMEIIP @ ru �URpE ,r i?AAN..KAKtENOR .-. . O G, SAID FEIN NZBOI. D11 AEEALANT.A d 6m PROJECT SITE �.• GHIIARY W a RVRE MIVA•:n.A(RF W PARK ROCKING MOOSE PL `> ' HORSESHOE aDEaNeEayg[I HORSESHOE CT 7P 1 LOS OSOS ROCKWER r.L.DfsDnE�am TRIPLE CROWN n .i KENTUCKY DERBY Ci SUMMIT G C `�+mv6rcxE DR INTERME�ATE g MNYMLST _;..5 _ 9 SUMMIT AVE 2M3 y>MNliy nvMtNry $ni awE>laarin BWESPROCE OM 61l>'ER SAOMf OA d x 31L' E du� 9 Y d ADOw9 SIESTA OR yam, v °>wN1EI 'A g.tA°'E�AF�SR^ ��pymt. P':WMOMn MWNIM V sR6-AANr o.N VMG`Rv nawyq•,I n �GWOII. � � M6N NOPMSOP IS COLT R �IS STILL © MEENOT G G. �6EOP IR wAwR•R>NE NDI�� M.4m OR VINTAGE WINDSTARORJ SLUE GUM CASSIA ST LC� Ii KRAL{R,• t t�BG Mrn -PCI i ,K•, d DA L06E�IL �dE 5 DR j d �WdAN''rt G ¢ROCK 'S WINCFLOWI; C ...�C BR Iq.Mn h� A6n 11GNBrAMC! ',wIOF RDCR DR� d? ��. RUSTNDAK§ GARDEN CT DR' 'CHEROKEE RD IpvPR:. ; MNV °Wrr h, rt VLM ADlNTE MMRA';CL SECMTARMT ORY ; �BRIDOEWATEROR E noLIK Nr^ Y'm 'M'^h.Ews ITn G ;vADIAPDa ARAPAHOSO gRCNASAWPO nI NIIM 1�6" POAAA- Rln �Rr�amPWII G G NRa1N� Q RDOEOOR _ 1YL' I MUEIIERST F& DR Inv+rOn an HIGHLAND AVE -• .•: 6 TuaRn R,G„ Rn 6¢ RI NDRCIA ML WHITESTONE OR xMDANCf. w`' AKsaw .umn _ / RAOMR's 'YA ytwln5anN'- t NSPURPi DOGWOOD PL.'(i. r o w;LE•.G F P d HROWA�P At sss }3`V A, g wRlwcr PRIM OSER•6�MUNDOCT ' d 9GINENSTONf 1111.9 s (ENyp� �Ak d NOrtua KLy 4F/ rRE�IA K uR, kTOflNN ,R B TAMARISK DRG ' 1 pWPASt d ZS OR AL W Alb. n �'FMLNGSTAP CT •b Gw NIKnL 1 k tcl AY wwcW `a MARSAUPL AKBM BMAr„ ' . aK �e�ar. VAli3. .,.SER' wuNua Lu d. 'BPRNI6 MIBi011 "4iO �G'R[G d sNOKPSrONF sfl t ,.a ti ems•.•/�PPANDO T ST CMNESI OP �4` ER 'w' rM,vRr y, y,,� eANN;f 3 55 gq �tRl n2 !i'91s Q BeFNaK C 41.. YIPy¢ AWm s LNPAA•G +�3 rArso>rr. Q NISTA ST RANCHO c •,'"� G d �H Q"D PAM a CU !f.. n4* wNT�(n "Qa a��k> 4 ulwun. Z %xoN sr m kypT� a r �i, xKN"ARM ��' Z�' Aa r M'�En ' Los CEDROS St i a- ETIWANDA c '.`x,�. nlry tNPaIIeBR wRA•aDM wRAsr Li�j M7NDROWS 7 I�altl.RSI,•:" %NEHURSr DA F. CARR RA Si a aWgP 't9H.a u ? e. c c as R'M� _ w VICTORIA ST L �/ KA' - K� ■ ETON OR GBNAPRIal ti_ c ABmari GEORGE Cr' w -GAR-- tl911 aNMCI c F Fp9L�� f AAR - LIOMFOOi Ab '•w REL* a AANVA G 1 wnn j wtRt`> Avax n..c Nl rn s vw. Bma+ua d ETIWANDA owExs oa P .4 0A c ♦ ,t,PNrAIBAm om,re d } $, # wNNPs 1EBSTECT ROGUI RM'9TR M1P�I'a.1<4.' Rurul�N _ r t #C•- IauA.,c C d d BPSMOR M r�WGAR GUNM spn5'L' •OWrV 5 K NRRRB {;f REDWOODOR 'ytid' }€ g§ K d .G EADDLEPH EDR 'l8 1 a 3 .afRwlnn.gKn CEf'9BM>>�� PRisr. " r' '� T WINDY GROVE DR IDfl. afl10R t�N�DP ANANAM -POLZAA LR ; E SMnMrw. KwJu EE HD' EL• MmaGK-IDDn R ON F3. qN• A, ¢GEmA J�IOA G6FAANiDi SMENAM50AM Ofll DA ,."'r.G i'I.�4y fARPI>�r_Ew Gi L _r �� BP.MOEELLLDPPC CNA 144-'Yc E .RK.�LaliuD E-K d G RENArfNA DRU J �s'8y3 IuaAF� �GRAPELAND j EDP'. BILE CUP CT L !aP a RTRArD OA t ? g MINTREE PI a •EL4NAWAS 8.wMrva r, g .. '�L 5 S CIDUFAU UR; CT c a• STAR TULIP TA A% Ai+ @ L S L IJ S �+� ,� WNOR SHOOTING STAR WY y n t t r h•r r••La A �! WMTi•'ORA 5;ari .. m �. ¢'HARIMALi ' �.-�LYj Gm o < BASE LINE BLVD .ER:MBA � Q' !r 71lDEMDR� 'd'- i !". 1R _ � d[ +CIm 2 PRD/INCE SI.c x gSTONEPIOGESI: 6 R.WHIr •REIMAV CELEBRATION DR HISTORIC ALL• K i g IS900 �. �> CORRESPONDCF PL w„ R 6 d }.. DR KC•KC'Ks gyIVAM �`+ �-7 MOWGOMEAY DR w WINE MUSEUfvltt d OLONNAIDE1 OR RILEYCT 3 �BrONEGEet &@ / RUREDGE CT CC d OR f�,d I„ A” IRONWOOD St SCHUYLEA CT CJ s,NwEla} .k IE`—IC- P ELEGANCE OR CaONW4 SRAPMNE R. f� iPf - c TARKINGTON PL MADPAAIR �' F " LOCNE L >P 5 / , •„ CONTINENTAL PL }NEVA%C1 � a ,OVLVEP DR Q OUAILE CT . e,N a. OUXII rPL Q .r �(>��• g A �}y. z o RHDOE ISLAND CT O PPrAL 0 d .y P MDDDtHASE Ct 9 P40iLM NEW ENG ANO DP BARLxOGVOR �j I d # ya.,, TERRA "A M•kNruw d y1STA �MwDTfNct ALAE WAV BRIOLEWGOD DR RuryIP[P0 .a BVWAWW p A LR j=CT B6� D PI LONG MEAOOWOR WILD �,' IS• . E•W__.gy,per , euN>Eaa RNNFL Cl dWiFRMDaI OR E M+uavarAO„d SPRING MOUNTAIN Lq WLLSCf .$ M6Nt1kl0 DR �.?Xi9 Y•`" [ aDK d .�S • K RPIER OAK E: . ,BTr :: K BPAaanutAA CINDIEWWOST w-Ow lA@Ka '.AUItWWK WILE.CR®I S E/A;'t ? ¢ Gd e Y SANER ROSE Cl 6: t vy < L'l' a WY FIRStONE DP 4 E'.t}.... .Y A9 NARww>tA5 .h G Y�pK. � � g . sRPOR}tA> ,m,N, _ ,s CHURCH ST b :dsj+ IT rr vuLEr qL ICASTERwr oNORIDGE PL �''.�` fi' G LOIRE. .IAWAY RO 4 CULTURN.CFNIEP DP Fga ;_ _ MILLERAVE VICTORIA GARDENS d GAMY,C? 5� •'.cCA HEMWST RTNTTKWIx BF snvAxFP Cn.yNnIM�L3 . �� rtT"" �• .. .WIFORDsr JQ 'Gq '9..yy�� ww CLARE I PLESLNLOT�j PAWBIFTO DR C.A. G.2.,• Ria"^qy NOPW", SUM AKIN ST d G aVbEM'a v 4QP TH ST Be Be pSADLAN CT DR E 6 a:SW GOEESE OR SP/ QP a•' VER6WLLEE�ST CHERVIL Si - g GAA014 `DPd ROCKINGHAM CT t' BLACK HORSE CT '� STAROR05i �_. RANCI, POTOMAC CT _ VICTORIA_ d lSANAN , YORKTOWN CT CNFPYR Sf . MEDICAL y CEDMLBROOK PL ' HIS I CENTER ;66' FOOTHILL BLVD / 1EST ' PooFOOTHILLVIN I y O CROSSING _j CHESTNUT AVE S-SWTIANWAY IVY AVE y MILLENIUM CT .; roup...::........ i F,PICFN!'FR LK W CUCAMONCAA ADULT SPORES COMPLEX ARROW ROUTE Of EXHIBIT A Item D-6 WHITMAN AV' Development Review DRC2013-00743 f � fes,{{' " l r= • *i " C .Mj {k.'.•r.�_G�.i�. :. ,`"' a - -4 Ba riy!a ri-.Ave�n u fes' % •�1 �., `:T�`15�,, T� � t . S • - -.. -tee. ..?. �a(• � E `'� , ' } �.. 4 � � `f� �. �_ ����}b ray� 1' x,� , -- '.� i '� ,e r...a� .••�+°'r is � 3•.�`-7:� �- Y - ��%r� •. .� _.. �.;� �_ . � c assia,Street �. �7-1 A lam" ♦ . ��, .`�*. 4 zs�}'�'�'i q �� �t ia,. Project, Site -�,.�°�`+�� q`r' ,, �.\:'.�D'1�°I?�•t"�?J!'� Yom_ ,'�'._,�'^,•�,- �" yam;,, �,y�� _ Foothill Freeway (SR-210) { t�_�� FFk. "► .t. �' r }'�� j. r ..` t - _ r[ °4. q .a ;`�f h r tlrygals 49 Ox f VI � �Y i •'� �}.- } �.y, •P � { ;L°fib' , r • r wF„'. - f .4 UJI ' ' + yk- � �,� if,� I✓� p -_ ti EXHIBIT B Wt I Item D-7 _ l ' g e ......................... I i r I _ --•+ i__ 1 i '-s-�•_•�=,-cc T'. r .r�'1 <I T Iii I�� �'li,.0 :,`. F-._ �i f•.► 1 !f ' II r;� i lyYly • u� �'llrt I , �..�� ��• 1I' III P' �J✓ r r r r .I r� I 1 ---- Ilii v - -.a .• (y .r " •il !" !L 1, II , I iY t. 1fr<. fit.. il 1 Y r 1 +!�' • .i ' C of iai d It1 I .7' ti4 IT t 11 p ril {�� I(t gip. i' ,• i ;,.,; '„�; a� �- e7 7 Y! ►� �' l tt;tl i, ---- rf I. L -- , y I•r ..11111. A. + i• .y��'!7r. , � 1 � 1 j: '', ctj t �ih:i(U.n 'f� 'i e• `I� I P,1111( t � r '.. ���”- -t 7` r ti• r 1 t Ip I III � 11 ,� 6 .I. A,1-------------- ski IT_ �-+�} •- �� q. �` C.r•,�!k I 111 t �r 9F , -- N _Y- ,.. .. .. mow.. ' W ,+�" a � tr it ° ,�• , r� �FI., �� .. I ' v, i {{ t i r , 3 rrtj 1 r� P ; • i r;' t s.. ' .....------ EXHIBIT C Item D—S E a m _ SITE PLAN for TRACT 18122 �. - . -- ---------- -- =— 1 - - - - _... .. - k y. 1 ' wr � wr N .. v tyy§ r y, -. -i• _�: �f �� 3 1•L I wiv r.wl - . 1 1 rb •i � _ e, 5t.:l : i m w' .m a - - , f , �t �",t '`�-._-- �y�-��` . :�. .,..,.ate prf.• yc t,+„�.wc.,..-�-w,�x-'t a,C- �. \, 3.� y>i" y "i--�- si� ,. .:.,-- v.r ---.. __'3-P' `'' -� �F:E-^^'.-:..+ai'�—i_-?'._._,. - _ �-s--_...-r � _:� al`-'..fis'-'-"'• _. -`- — -- —fit INDEX MAP DATE OF YAP FLAN/ PLANT M11NSilWfJITONYEWAY PLAN2 FlAN2 NlT114iRAlWITLWIYEWAY PLAN2GSIiA PUN 2 CAWA MTN SnWGHT DOMWAY PLANT PLANT PLAN I MAN S7RAlf.MTORAINAY WDID N0.8 360366362 ORC2013-00743 SITEPLANINX SITE PLAN r-0TTT.-j PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR: FOR ' ' a ' 'I GARAGE TREAWNTS MAYERS & ASSOCIATES ®KB HOME °�L°"GSE"A"`s '�PE' S"T�' TRACT 18122 u o : i I 19 w E«rw. xi xis'• rwain.rr,. - » v'c..ee. CIVIL ENGINEERING,Inc.y'sr 363 10 KILDONUWDVALLEY DRIVE -J. SEiBAPfENIHY n xir. swe•aavmNow,r.a. ro sc W2OOA4AR.G 92595 SLIE(.YiRr A xih aa'w.w xmYrwa<D err wwamwrinYna wYn rRo :PLANNING•LNGINL•LNING•SUM\'LYING N?MECITYQFR4% CUGIA'YA?<G{LIFOWVu s .m N AlAln '..va. TEC:(951)691-5241 SHEET 2 W BwsgY alwT,1 IrW warWrE Mw,>u aYlYwrwlYlEINYW YYYJNYaarNgwNYMvnP YY,ww SITE PLAN for TRACT 18122 ji • y : a .— .�� e � I a �I. �� E �', i �'A / __ t� •SFr a 44 . 1 S d .I n it w : 1 I t _ • A ;1 � :� � :1 � - .1• c :1 gl _ 411:_ I` — al. 51=� �;>7;ln -•ti P., - SS„ A GRAD cscut f x 1 rk �E f 1`xc,�:u„v:A-.n ......__. __..,.._ .::�.:.1 �Kn:� -- '.:2: __ ��-�✓e \�•:amw _-:_�':.•"'_ __— _ �X--.�"a. f� i(i .. 4 71 7 A IT i..i... A ! R F ! e .r i 1 t SITE PLAN - ,1;= FOR tfi ._,.,. �_-�._ � •.•` TRACT 18122 .. .. .. _ w me nrrc><R+nc�cucualr:+.oua�evexu SHEET 3 1✓♦wn�allm Rs npnrtrww �ivau SITE PLAN for TRACT 18122 a - , >•` `- j .71 , u,' !7#L ai , R _.,„..-.. .W.-a+.:>�i jj __� _ _.�.�..___ .. ,1 A f ! ti:� - !._�'' ,�_ ,._'•'-- - - --- --- k-}-.woo. ... - . - — xxs7r7r�77aivE � z � i I I ' .� ` R__ x 3 A P f I"f 1 t 1.. _• _ _. rD y !7# j !# § 371 _:!# 3 u.;'I §!#' rF 3 , .._. is _. s i i4 I 'M5 � 1 : ✓r _., _ � � - ( fJ7APNIC SLUE 7 ' , I , r,(�, .. -•i� , � _.�• �#` ' _ ! I !� __' � a _tij 5 - i fig; i->r�--� 'i : ; �. .. I .. _ -: — µ R , T i �, i.=... _. ` - -.. '1 .• , T .< �t ���. DRC2013-00743 � : SITE PLA FOR TRACT 18122 M L r .0,7Wprr0crtANC.0C1,au0vc,,ruFaaxw SHEET ,rsw--"'---�---'��- - - CL—U wv+I 3 1181HX3 39 ARB tft � � It• ,1 "i j \ }' 111,1111 5110141 axl, d'a"! 1 Pi E at t;s !a s I ►C0 N1.4 �Cjt. �:!';i! �'; •€=x� ,jta "��� a, a;.' , iAA99 ais; I d M Ilat;.c I , fill, Ell, At ip Ai t 5• +'A]+3 �!; ! ,t �9 �1ig 1141 flip tti.SR tEal t , !�!lolNF;OR � — Iis 1 fill' !tlttt iasttt lttEat �; j t:° �.. ,gki '.r=G IIIIIII -tt, I fj g01.rt.EA..A''� � --------------P 0J F iq s #,�# Rig � �s$fI; IPta j t; IE�lflftft i� e ; t 1 ; Af � i� f 1f��,lslE' 111d. -1 11016,1;,111; xt t.l ■M 1,y/e, Ci 1l1,ASI X10 Fl�� itlz�fa°11E1it+ =— .f1111;, t.•„ 1 �, tj !� ,, N � � a . I j� a` a � ix i#11111' .1' • 111 '1, i j� `! g InWrS31 I. ! a ar \ i4.. A a� �-z co `.. J IZZ ki ; tt fi � am"�3117MMM Item D-14 m BddLVJG SErfACdB CONCEPTUAL PRECISE GRADING PLAN d T -- FOR .. TRACT NO. 18122 LEGHIG Of SYYBOLd i CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9� llABI /1All1rMSlRAIfAfrBIWENAY n LEGENBGFANREW1TIpJd mrNy M —�— �, N l w+.vr VICINITY"YAP u n r r r HABl aaBlr771siJacdraArvElur � I •° _n.uue . ....,.......s • fl Y Y� t KIM r sr / i dKnrra ,�...•. .+.r. �1, , y r i O r mt _-�_ — •rso.uweiuwrwaw.rwaa� vuxt ctivr. JtABd CASRAr/NdIR.VrA17GCYEWAY �' f r . 3 PLO � _ r 1 Sl SEC �.. .. .. __ at IaAB. M�1.MI MfMdIRApNfYNT1YY . � N S#rn/ v[�tE. I� �,'` 1 � –S` rar.r Oe scmE ---- un}mcawAxlEs CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGAr/ CONCEPTUAL PRECISE GRADING PLAN TRACTNO.18722 • m..w TITLE SHEET y W DRC2013-00743 �lw�llOwRl[OI�I01Ed r SSGRSF�d1:I1fEfS w+ownlycrar uuv wrz_ yw ^y rt dO1Ld Ea1GIIEQ OMNER.OF18rr7 M36Gi IFi1MIGJ AWA% .`' � ccr w..+_ $fE ACRFd / r wwx wwra �/b- _ _.w..w ww_.a u„rw"�.,,e,�y. Aroeoo.s.n.rs .n ww,on .r-.o.rw.w<• nwr_nsr. /„r«re. ••"_.`•�-,”' SREE76: i T ... ....... ... ...........-. V 77 V r 7 l, 177 rD if 7 Kq �4 K; SEE SKEEr Na 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCEPTUAL PRECISE GRADING PLAN 1 3 TRACT NO. 8122 DRC2013-0074 ROM P, SHEET 7 SEE SHEET NO.2 AL-- 4/- Ati ------- ----- AL, To xc r L J rD 'i r .1 L L e iTx r7 71 SEE SHEET NO.4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCEPTUAL PRECISE GRADING PLAN TRACT NO.18122 ORC2013-00743 2" ET. SEE SHEET NO.7 f ` hj �. � � . . ,� \( eP: 'ice•: '" t I At 1 I ima \: 'I♦ rw'" �i � �,4f .1 \ 'E- l7l'—J'71` ,w}`. i ,?h k ' .�.. i� t. , ♦ �:. "�.0 ♦ •` 4 "moi-•--'--rte Y .. ] •s' CE r NCQCKPtA t vc'..y r D t i t •� \ 1 LG f •� Ff. s • \ h { SEE SNEETNO.S V�V ' _= r~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. yc�....♦r.e.s+.nw.. CONCEPTUAL PRECISE GRADING PLAN TRACT NO.18122 ORC2013-W743 —SHEET 0 a� SEE SHEET NO. f I • I � ; pp , ' ` .i 5 i jI \ =C t_ I %u.I ':w:.k..J •I` -1- � . I I i ,Wr,� `� I f: �\ I rr ; 't � 1• �i a irk ,. (—,� � �+ �{ ` 4 �\ i4i, oil .-� to ��I I. ; '■ . � : i fie. '.� � '\ , L •) ' I ` -, t1 �.�• I ; 41 fir... ... `. � t * t L "+ i t:� I,,. ? mrs i� urr �..wa4 ' �. \ / ; \ •�.� y `� it �' 111 � �. � .I \ '\ N I ,•� ) #'t , I I -F �'\ - -- ---- - - , :I: / _ ) s i . L i SEE SHEET NO.6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCEPTUAL PRECISE GRADING PLAN TRACT NO.18122 DRC101&W743 � ..." >.... wn...u. O SEE SHEET NO.5 �1 I 1� k. - - '1 y� I a t \ t I ` � �* torr•.. .� � � I I �. i r, I 777 , D �1 �1 ,'/ YFV ` 4 l tort� t�s ��'•�' 1 : l r �. 41 CE 1 1 1 s c ,�+,,y' _ al �._. \... ?moi aO+ ^. •� •ti'' '',` ` 'pie '+'SF`. `'" ..�; t f t i. , WGRVGSGLLE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCEPTUAL GR ADING PLAN 7R1CTNO.18722 ORC2013--00743 fecrpN roo` cnar� sEcnav-c-c- c � o..wiea... u-r� �� o..w.,.v.. •...,,,Y �,`S,'� SHEET I/ 1 m X 00 G7 �ievaaon'A'((Spanish o on�a r+ (D 3 O I N I � I I I I � E CV8GOI1'B'(C[8ftS�— PLAN I RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER '""ITU OF RI'""' w» s CANCFIO CUCAMONGA snx� I •MnfPu—__.._-_ _ _ jos 1/afin EIEI Elevation'C'"i amihouse) rD3 O I N N 1: n....ae Ewation'D'(Cottage) N A RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER ' „ ;. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �u r------------------ I I i uAu�ootAw I - _ _ HAM aaa I I - I I TOTN AREA 1991 SO.FT. ; wvn «• r I I —_ _ MASTER — - r� '•` 4 "• ; BEDROOM .wro r I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 , GREAT ROOM 1 IFJ i OO KITCHEN MTM 00 I 1 1 1 II ____ .______• 1 I ti. OI I 11 I I I• rf• it - —1ry-Y---- a=TM FL 9 rl (D 3 wear N BEDROOM I I II 2 it I ENTRY I I I I I I I ---_ + DEW OPT ... BEDROOM I I \1 � 3-CAR - ----UK I I GARAGE - - I I 1 I I I I I I I BEDROOMaawryNw I I 1 I I I I I 1 I - 1 I - PLAN I RANCHO CHAFFEY - - MWLTO ORDER ICITY o RANCI IO CUCAMONGA First Flooc Plan'A' fRMY b'NpT FArFy IDN --- wr. i BEDROOM ii n 7-7-7-7 DEN/OPT " ! BEDROOM 3-CAR -------- GARAGE -----GARAGE BEDROOM Partial Floor Plan'C' Ejmr" BEDTIOM n I I BlipL W OPTDROOM 'r +I 4 •wn Y ...._--s•"st•��-_J 3-CAR GARAGE BEDROOM Partial Floor Plan'B' �qPLAN I RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA snuff r+ •�• 0 ; i BEDROOM tJl i � artm \rDEN/OPT BEDROOM i POIICJI 4 3-CAR -- GARAGE BEDROOM �W,M Partial Floor Plan'D' wiiui".,,..�.e.�`--- RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER ":"" CITY OF RANCHU CUCAMONGA ■e��a�ow '��r ----- -----, ------ ------ -------------- - - ------ r i i rF ' (D 3 o I ; r•, ' � �, i t i i 'A' Spanish Colonial 'B' Craftsman Roof Plans PLAN 1 u � w; r .^�-. RANCHO CHAFFEY 'TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r----- ----- -------------- ------------- I 1 , I I � I 1 I II I 1, „ „ (D ti 3 ' , 1 I I I i 1 I 11 , r I , I ' , � I 1 I I _____________ 'C' Farmhouse 'D' Cottage PLAN I Roof Plans RANCHO CHAFFEY tyy�,l SiWY '47MY MINTO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCA r r aamu A El on MP (D Front Elevation'A'(Spaa>s o omal) 3 I N W Y 8 k 3- 5 4 F 3 3 4 Rear�evation'A'(Spanish Colonial) PLAN 1 RANCHO CHAFFEY W'�� TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r r..yamu �. ir nm OO 000 00 0000 (p Left Elevation'A'(Spanish Colonial) I N tD �I �..�. Right Elevation'A'(Spanish Cor.nml) PLAN 1 M RANCHO CHAFFEY ,s� SIOIn IENIY TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA i I 1 I I I HH.".1111 IIR It 11 1 I W111111111 till Front Elevation'B'(Craftsman) D 3 I I 1 , I r r � r y I B i it H t BI Bnuon H �.f i� Rear Elevation'B'(Craftsman) PLAN I OTCNWRIM RANCHO CHAFFEY : CITY CITY OF OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DD DD DD DD DD DD ....�� oD DD DD DD,DD DD DD DD DD,DD DD . - DD Do { Lef�Eleva'tion�'B'�(Cra man) D I + I III I. m � � � IIS •mwr000, � � Ot 'iailw j 111 Right Elevation'B'(Craftsman) PLAN 1 RANCHOCHAFFEY �. TO ORDER "'" FwerFl OH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA + Front Elevation'C'(Farmhouse) D I I p , p 3 1 a N i i p p _ Y H 1 i p onv,v cvox N � ! p 1 10, Rear Elevation'C'(Farmhouse) PLAN I RANCHO CHAFFEY p.w ur TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e..a4AN ---------------------- p Left Elevation'C'(Farmhouse) 7 I N i V ml i �� - Right Eleva[ion'C'(Farmhouse) PLAN_I /i �[e ® ':95" • •• RANCHO CHAFFEY 11WT sTg11 TO ORDER I C17Y`OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA F.r Auu �R + Front Elevation'D'(Cottage) D 3 i N P m a Ti renes 31 i 31 11 It # 9 11 �.,•sem o.�ww om s - u a e ai �rra� Rear Elevation D'(Cottage) PLAN I RANCHO CHAFFEY n�xw ?ro4i R1Y Ne TO ORDERSTORY bSTORY LIIV OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA erWrramu D!� DD =JF__j ,�... ug vlevation'D'(Cottage 3 I s 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 � 1 eecaumc woro 1 M_�vt 1 .�.,.�. ...a„ a: Riglit Elevaiioi (Cottage) PLAN 1 RANCHO CHAFFEY m:Y TO ORDER CITY,OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ��aµ - ® 00 00©0 00 0000 --------------- 00 0000 Leff Elevation'A'(Spanish Colonial) Front Elevation'A'(Spanish Colonial) D 3 I N s .._� x , � t Lu e R ggh—t evaiion'A'(SpiiishTolonial) Rear Elevat'ion'A'(Spanish Colo �) PLAN 1 RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �b"�a El00❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ -- DO `- R 9 00❑❑ DD❑❑❑❑❑❑ E1 ❑r ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑F ❑o a❑ ❑❑F-1 ❑❑❑❑ 00 LeFt Elevatton'B'(Cras� Front Elevation'B'(Craftsman) 'D -111 1 11 11 U11 I v P 3 v v i i r .f— I i 5 jp:� I FFM i a gygyd y 9 � p Right Elevation B'(Craftsman) Rear Elevation'B'(Craftsman) PLAN 1 RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA ■ ■ 00 Left Elevation (F 'C' arm o—r use) Front Elevation'C'(Farmhouse) 'D 3 I Do 1 i w 1 - a EL 1 6 j Right ElElevation'C'(Famthouse) Rear Elevation'C'(Farmhouse) PLAN 1 ll�u`MW u Ort SIfNtYiYIURY TO ORDER CITY ° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I I I Left Elevation'D'(Cottage) Front Elevation'D'(Cottage) r+ N 3 I w I 1 I ' I � I I , I I , I I � 1 � I a. I I Ri6levation'D'(Cottage) Rear Elevation'D'(Cottage) yy� PLAN 1 ,, _I;E� KUllwefwJ.n,.4,v,C�rYN.AMT�' IU)AI RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER ""' .�.,. SIUKY ISTOtY CITY OF RANCHO LUCAMUNGA r,+n.,ialu r .dp r.urrt wp� ev ttlon'A'4(Spanish o oma rD 3 O I O i i 1 I 1F I cw�s I I I I I I y wow - - Elevation'13'(Craftsman) PLAN IX w v q, =•._.• RANCHO CHAFFEY � a„•.I we l TO ORDER ,�•.,� �.�, I„>k, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r+ .... Eleva6on'C'(Farmhouse rDD I 3 r,..V g .mowm Eleviti 'D'(Cottage) gPLAN IX RANCHO CHAFFEY :. TO ORDER '""""'"° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 wue�ooi•o� i TOTAL AREA 79DI 90.FT. I -- - - — I .� MASTER BEDROOM =A=::: n0 K I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 � til L------------------J ' ' I11 GREAT ROOM I I Bo ii II I I 1 F�J i O O KntHEN 1 I I I --- R I, ----------- Q 0V FLEX I - -------- Mm (D d [D � 1 3 LAuN r 1 Y h 4 I II II BEDROOM 2 M --- DEN/OPT .. roRo BEDROOM J �1 I GARAGE BEDROOM coumv*m — =moi• --�._- - PLAN IX a T( RANCHO CHAFFEY 1 '� w 4. First�vGr—plan'A „ ORDE CITY OF 93110.1.OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA o� BEDROOM " 2 r BF�OOM GARAGE BEDROOM Partial Floor Plan'C' Li BEDROOM i W F BEDROOM i 4 ar`"r 4 r GARAGE BED 3. Partial Floor Plain' V PLAN IX RANCHO CHAFFEY 4F TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rF 1 3 BEDR,lOOM i I T' M DEW OPT f I' ramr BED eM I mw".r d I' GARAGE BEDROOM �Y„p '. Partial Floor Plan'D' PLAN IX �: L� �L RANCHO CHAFFEY n , TO ORDER u' vw.ra wu I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ----- -----, I I 1 1 I I I I I I -- r I I I I ' I I I 1 I I I � I I I � I 1 1 ' 1 ' ------ 1 ' (D 41 ` 3 I Ul I i I A I I Y 1 J I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I �________; i II II I I____ -___J t 1 I I ' 1 I I 'A' Spanish Colonial 'B' Craftsman Roof Plans PLAN I RANCHO CHAFFEYn.•x a I— a.� ,I TOORDER " " Fd . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I I I I1 1 I I ------ ------ -------------- I 1 -------------- I 1 I I ' 1 I I ;T- J, � I II I II I II I I I � II � I I I , � I I I , I .p I Ql � , I , I I I 11 1 I I 1 I 1 I 11 I 1 1 � I 1 I I I I I I I 1 'C' Farmhouse 'D' Cottage Roof Plans PLAN I X IMAN "419 _A RANCHO CHAFFEY 11 T CWI Y' FY RANCHO CUCAMONGA .74 r+ Front Elevation'A'(Spam Colonial) olonial) D I v t B 1 i Rear Elevation'Af(Spanish Colonial) PLAN IX RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Fl-'.'"" r Left Elevation'A'(Spanish Colonial) (D 3 I 00 Right Elevation'A'.(Spanish Colonial) PLAN IX . RANCHO CHAFFEY ", ii M11oWW tib STWI' ISIOIY TO ORDER � � Cm OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I I I I I I - I NY. I Front Elevation W(C man) I t0 KV-- I I ZI oil 11 I f r Y J Ii wo ne�ucs �� rwr I !I f N - H Rear Elevation'B'(Craftsman) PLAN IX RANCHO CHAFFEY MM@LrO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUGMONGA rrrasa r' Front Elevation -'C' (Farmhouse) m 3 I ui was..san ufn CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rear Elevation'C' (Farmhouse) PLAN IX RANCHO CHAFFEY 3 U'l NJ Left E16'ation 'C' (Farmhouse) ''cjTY'ZF RANCHO CUCAMONGA —Right E liv at i6ri'C " (F Ouse) PLAN IX RANCHO CHAFFEY Front Elevation 'D' (Cottage) Rear Elevation 'D' (Cottage) RANCHO CHAFFEY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAN IX (D I Ln B■ _ ■�- 11:: �'. ►1�II Left Elevation 'D' (Cottage) Right Elevation DI (Cottage) PLAN lX RANCHO CHAFFEY wllo lY�1 \1&yAm IJIMI � 'FullYrs. CA RIA I4 i TO ORDER CITY'S cin of wwcxo cucwMoNcw !+ m 3 I Ln Ln Elevation '13"(tihsman) Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) PLAN 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CHAFFEY r+ (D 3 O 1 111 a) $leva 6PD' (Cottage) =11 II,'lll III_ =III III= _II III= __ .. I■�==; .�,_— 1 (= _l_�� I-1 —I-� I —=Cil ... �'—� 1, I��= � _�= I►I I ISI III =,,_LI '�i__—i—illl __IIIIIII Illi:=1— �=�li�i oi�� �1=�li�i i�il_� __1111 IIII III _III—=�s� Elevation"O (Farmhouse) PLAN 2 RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER 'OF CITIF ItnNCI 10 CUCAMUNGA IMM mmeot TOTAL AREA 9630 'A. FT. wn.x v � tl rt. First Floor Plan 'A' PLAN 2 MiYmn.f. RlW CITY OF RANCf1O CUCAMONGA RANCHO CHAFFEY sNF\' �.pryµy ;+ 3 O i 00 Partial First Floor Plan 'D' Partial First Floor Plan 'C' Partial First Floor Plan B' PLAN ; P��lf�P�ttfii�ln� cewe.sw..rrwc� n:ucns�w� CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA RANCHO CHAFFEY rD 0 I Ul 'C' Farmhouse 'A' Spanish Colonial Roof Plans PLAN 1pmil i M �I. OIJ.J �Yt41!�s CITY OF RANCI 10 CUCAMONGA RANCHO CHAFFEY Rear Elevaiion'A' (Spanish Colonial) Front Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) PLAN 2 RANCHO CHAFFEY �. • s:�:; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Left Elevation'A' (Spanish Colonial) Right Elevation'A' (Spanish Colonial) PLAN Z �; ," , ;�•" "° RANCHO CHAFFEY „w TO ORDERS CITY OF PANCIIO CUCAMONGA Rear Ek'vation'B'~(Craftsman) Front E evation'B' (Craftsman) }}� PLAN 2 RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER C OF ;�, s;�A CITY OF RANC40 CUCAMONGA _ Left Elevation'B' (Craftsman) Right Elevation 'B' (Craftsman) PLAN 3 1 i � , � w•; .- �, r;�" RANCHO CHAFFEY p. liliml-0 ORDER 1 CITY CITY OF • sro�r wioav RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rear Elevation"" (Farmhouse) Front E evation 'C"(Farmhouse) PLAN 3 MMZTO ORDER RANCHO CHAFFEY .""'`" A. CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONOA .w.,..m. Left Elevation 'C(Farmhouse) Right Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) PLAN 2 RANCHO CHAFFEY ias w. staRr �sros� CITY OF (iANCflO CUCAMONGA Rea--91 evation 'D' (Cottage) Front Elevation 'D' (Cottage) PLAN 2 RANCHO CHAFFEY i zTtR1 CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HhuY� l lu T 3 O I V Left Elevation 'D' (Cottage) Right Elevation'D' (Cottage) a- RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w,. PLAN 2 Elevation W (Craftsman) Elevation 'A' (Spanish~ Colonial) �y PLAN 2X MIN il �7'W:�� a:..,. RANCHO CHAFFEY .uhW rai. TO ORDER " T. -Y "' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Elevation l:k-(Cottage) Eleva[ion'C'(Fannhouse) PLAN 2X RANCHO CHAFFEY ® TO ORDER CITY OF of RwNcuo cucaMoNca ,,;,,;, , _,,,, ' ""• lomew TOTN_ARlA 9630 fOrK rew fpl tl First Floor Plan'A' atOpt. Caslta PLAN 2X TO ORDRANCHO CHAFFEY >w ER ,., .9 .. , -.. Clll' OF ItANC110 CUCAMONGA wwrami. � sroxr Partial First Floo-( Plan 'D' Partial First Floor Min'C' Partial First Floor Plan '13' re on.w �.�... � rrro.a PLAN 3X W7 IS ��� •�,�� a.< RANCHO CHAFFEY oiir:.`wmm wn. 7 ORDER CITY OF ttANC110 CUCAMONGA ..m. Roof Plans at Opt. Ca to 'C' Farmhouse 'A' Spanish Colonial day � PLAN 3X RANCHO CHAFFEY ® ---- CITY OF ItANCl10 CUCAMONGA 0 00 0 )0 LeR Elevation'A' (Spanish o-lontal) Right Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) 0 00 EW Front Elevation 'A' (SpanisF-Co-lomal) PLAN 2X ..� RANCHO CHAFFEY nttx CIT' OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA U Left Elevation 'B' (Craftsman) 7 J P Jlll� VIII �.� Right Elevation V (Craftsman) —Front Elevation'B' (Cra ts�) PLAN 2X 4: L]S w:< R��.�..a... RANCHO CHAFFEY� m,a TO ORDER I CITY OF OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA .. rami. genu' f U Left Elevation'C' (Farmhouse) 7 J Jl IC -I��i, _._....__ Right Elev'ation'--'C'-(F armhouse) rant evatimi'C'(Fannhouse) 9wN PLAN 3X 4 C w, : RANCHO CHAFFEYORDER .- ..o., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r I ■.■ - I�� — � r 111■■■',111 ■■ III■■■... � Leff -E- levation "D'(Cottage) Right Elevation'D' (Cottage) Front Elevation `D' (Cottage) PLAN 3X �- RANCHO CHAFFEYIA a. v TO ORDER I CITY OF IUNCnO CUCAMONGA Right Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) �qp PLAN 2 �: L7i! ':«,°^ .• RANCHO CHAFFEY„� <w TO ORDER I CITY OF ItANCIIO CUCAMONGA au �o 3 I v 00 Left Elevation `B' (Craftsman) Rear Elevation'B' (Craftsman) Right Elevation 'B' (Craftsman) PLAN 2 sioRr RANCHO CHAFFEY R M%11w ODER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA isruri Rig evation 'C' (Farmhouse) �yy PLAN 2 RANCHO CHAFFEY yMJ.r. r�93Af IUM n.� 'l`till TO ORDER c�ry of R -MO CUTAMO.A � a» r+ 3 0 i co 0 Right Elevation 'D' (Cottage) PLAN 3 RANCHO CHAFFEY ff"dLTO ORDER I CIN OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Elevation 'B' (Craftsman) le�uon'A''(Spanish Co o� nial) } PLAN 2X ,��� RANCHO CHAFFEY �1KWTO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r+ m 3 I 00 N Elevauon'D' (Cottage) V�IG Ie1w1YKLVs CaY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) PLAN 2X RANCHO CHAFFEY fTOIYIslMY Y�Y 4 su r+ 3 i ol w TOTAL ARE/. %10 50, FT, F [Moor Pla i' at Opcarage p PLAN 2X RANCHO CHAFFEY IM TO ORDER '"" •"�' CITY OF RANCHO COCAMONGA rw.amu ` r+ c0 3 v I 00 Partial First Floor PI, D' Partial First Floor Plan 'C' Partial First Floor Plan 'B' PLAN 2X - RANCHO CHAFFEY XRANCHOCHAFFEY nwm, m.wu TO ORDER ' CrrY OF RANCUO CUCAMONGA na..ra mu 's�Y m 3 0 i 00 Ln Roof Plans aC Opt'. Garage 'C' Farmhouse 'A' Spanish Colonial p PLAN 2X S. M .e u � RANCHO CHAFFEY CITY OF u r ®f TO ORDFtANCitO CUCAMONGA ER I ., .. _..,, YT-, .,Tw, ra�.mw O 00 O 00 r -F 3 Leff -E-tion 'A' (Spanish oolomal) Aw 00 rn Right Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) Front Elevation'A' ((Spanish Colonial) PLAN 2X w;:.�a"`" "`•• RANCHO CHAFFEY x�M• ':" TO ORDER CITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r+ Le evation'B' (Cra$sman) co V Right Elevation'B' (Craftsman)- Front Elevataon'B' (Cra sman _b a "°�°^�+ RANCHO CHAFFEY PLAN 2X w�,� ®[—TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STOR\` .STtMY hYuq'l_VN r+ 3 I W W Leff evation'C' Farmhouse r ( � Right Elevation C (Farmhouse)- Front Elevation'C' (Farmhouse) PLAN 2X L, RANCHO CHAFFEY .u,. TOIA ORDERS «.,.�R� - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3 I 00 lD Left Elevation 'D' (Cottage) Right Elevatioti'D' (Cottage) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Front Elevation'D' (Cottage) RANCHO CHAFFEY PLAN 2X .LA..,w. =1 D 3 7 I O D Elevation11W (Spanish Colonial) Elevation'C' (Farmhouse) El evation'B' (Craftsman) Elevation'D' (Cottage) PLAN 3 g�q RANCHO CHAFFEY """° �. " .ems • TO ORDER �" s•Ux, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -- su ------------- I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I Se co nd Floor Plan 'A' qau FMQB TOTAL AREA 4076 50. FT. Fiat Flo_ Pla 'A' PLAN 3 5 r n RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER„., aTOFY CITY OF IL4NCI10 CUCAM_NGA D I D I weal P ,I cle�l �I II a mil � II ROOM ROOGAME M MTM MTM O s BEDROOM BEDROOM n ay. w.�onr wwar �i IPC i �: i IOb I I L' _______1 1 L , I -- I I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I �------------------------'� �----------------------� Partial Second Floor Plan'C' Partial Second Floor Plan'B' II I I �� DINI 1 SCAR i GARAGE II 11 11 11 11 ' LM�IC ' I I I 1 1 I I lOIIO/ 1 1 I 1 I I I I --------------------= Partial First Floor Plan'C' Partial First Floor Plan 'B' PLAN 3 ME MM"W3 RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER CITY; RANCHO CUCAMONGA t D 3 7 I D N GAME' ROOM ff"2 BEDROOM ; uuronr ------------------------- I � I � i i i i -------------------------� Partial Second Floor Plan'D' Partial First Floor Plan 'D' PLAN 3 = RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER I CwITY OF RANCI 10 CUCAMONGA 'A' Spanish Colonial 'B' Craftsman 'C' Farmhouse 'D' Cottage Roof Plans PLAN 3 kms^ RANCHO CHAFFEY ORDER M"""" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7 0 n Rear Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) Front Eievation'A' (Spanish Colonial) PLAN 3 MRO RANCHO CHAFFEYORDE� CITY OF RANCt10 CUCAMONGA , D 3 7 I D s Left Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) Right Elevation'A' (Spanis Colonial) PLAN 3 / RANCHO CHAFFEY LTO] ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �' VI T D 3 7 I D J Rear Elevation V (Cra s� Front $Ievation"B (Craftsman) PLAN 3 � � RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER ' ..., CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA aau Left Elevation '& (Craftsman) Right 'B' (Crate PLAN 3 }. JUNORANCHO CHAFFEY; C1TY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA Rear Elevation'C' (Farmhouse) Front Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) RANCHO CHAFFEY CITY OF RANCI 10 CUCAMONGA PLAN 3 Left Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) Rtght Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) y PLAN 3 RANCHO CHAFFEYFMX .� ««,. TO ORDER I CITY OF RANCFIO CUCAMONGA D 7 Rear Elevation 'D' (Cottage) Front Elevation 'D' (Cottage) PLAN 3 RANCHO CHAFFEY WJJww.„u Rfif fTORV To ORDER CITY OF WWCHOCUCAMONGA D 3 7 I D v Let�Elevation'D' (Cottage) Right Elevation 9 (Cottage) PLAN 3 RANCHO CHAFFEY n h� TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D 7 I D N j�= Left Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) Right Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) Front Elevation'A' (Spanish Colonial) Rear Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) PLAN 3 RANCHO CHAFFEY ILI, 11 TO ORDER I CITY OP9RANCHO CUCAMONGA D I Left Elevation B' (C s fi g L"Im"Im"i'll � IN 111 III Front Elevation'B' (Craftsman) oil Right Elevation'B' (Cra s� Rear Elevation 'B' (Craftsman) p PLAN 3 RANCHO CHAFFEY >�xW TO ry5navb6 F rwm x,�u�r ORDER CITY OF RANL'l10 CUCAMONGA �-w 11 N I��I IIII Left Elevation 'C'(Farmhouse) D 3 D n Front Elevation'C' (Farmhouse) Right Elevation'C' (Farmhouse) Rear Elevation 'C'(Farmhouse) PLAN 3 f� � w • RANCHO CHAFFEY • TO R ODER CITYF "A mur ,mwr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D 3 Z) L D T Left 116VaiiOr1'"(6ttage) logo1Bina son Now smi]s,II Iriill Omni FEE moo son zz- Right E levation"'D' (Cottage) --fr-o—nt Elev'ation"'& (Cottage) Rehr Elevation Elevation 'D' (Cottage)— PLAN 3 RANCHO CHAFFEY ®j TO ORDER I CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA TOM' Elevauoti'A' (Spanish Colonial) Elevation'B' (Craftsman) ---Eievatilin'C' (Farmhouse Elevation �'D'(Cottage) PLAN 4 w,. RANCHO CHAFFEY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V I DO I'�dId r W•fdrted ®�dor � r IIIII. 1pj1fM-TM�nr�11.1O1.. wm_MY1r_i1TM 1 Lss--1w-w-�I1III IhIII,. 'IIIIII ��I -------�1I BEDROOM y ..tira _r-1;II1 i 4 a _ _ iiI1r11II1 II __-_�_• ---- II II —WO r IIIIII 11 1 1IIIII W11a11 W i1I111IIIII 1I111IIII I JU_N_IO. R SUITE Orv1------ _ - __-__--____MTM II GREAT ROOM__ G BEDROOM 1 12 ROOM 2 LOFT Ox II 11 O KrrCHEN � AT I"..z HII GARAGE JiIIII S i i V BEDROOM i+�f L dow 3 BEDROOM III 1 I I FLEX 11,11 I 1 1 1 - u 47�L , 1 I I Ax6100TA01 I I I I I a w'c as.Vc� aae b ' I I I TOTAL ARCA I54! 5a. FT. 1 Pprxl I I wRw I I I I pNwtcw v rw Y ' • we +art. I I I am.ww rt. Second Floor Plan 'A' II First Floor Plan 'A' PLAN 4 RANCHO CHAFFEY » " TO ORDER u°�n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA n.oe... ax -sTaar q T 3 D I D .D 1 1 I I I I b MIS i ROOM 4 fl � alar II I N1 I I ' I r,.11" rr I I ' 1 ' I ' L------------------------� Partial Second Floor Plan'C' m.l ee.r y I FU71 BEDROOM 3 BEDROOM 4 I i III ' 1 rrr I 1 I 1 I I I i I 1 � I I I ! ----------------------J Partial Second Floor Plan'B' Partial First Floor Plan 'C' Partial First Floor Plan 'B' PLAN a o„I �;"„ RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER CITY OF RANCIIO CUCAMONGA 4 rD 3 Z) O I 1 1 1 -------------- ----------A Partial Second Floor Plan'D' Partial First Floor Plan 'D' PLAN 4 RANCHO CHAFFEY NM&jO ORDER) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'A' Spanish Colonial 'B' Craftsman Roof Plans 'C' Farmhouse 'D' Cottage ppqq PLAN a 1: mm RANCHO CHAFFEYUM&R Tp 0FZDERCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rD 3 0 Rear Elevation A' (Spanish Colonial) Front Elevaaon'A' (Spanis��lonlal) PLAN 4 RANCHOCHAFFEY� «..� TO ORDER OF CITY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA h 1D w Left Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonial) Right Elevation'A' (Spanish Colonial) PLAN 4 F -I m" "Na" � ,.�, a - RANCHO CHAFFEY JIM TO ORDER • '•''` CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Rear E1evation4 (Craftsman) Front Elevation'B' (Crateman) PLAN 4 �: RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER 'CITY CITY OF RANCf IO CUCAMONOA rD 3 0 ft Left Elevation B' (Craftsman) L_ 1-1111 mill 10 J. LINE Rig t Elevation'B' (Cra m—an)— y PLAN 4 RANCHO CHAFFEY �. TO ORDER CITY OF KANCIIO CUCAMONGA Rear Elevation'C' (Farmhouse) Front Mvation'C (Farmhouse) PLAN 4 ®i , �� �.`..• RANCHO CHAFFEY K •M TO ORDER I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0, I I 1 1 1 1 ' 1 I 1 I R— ght E evat on'ffl*F nn FO use) 4 MR; �i{ w RANCHO CHAFFEY I&ATO ORDER C„",»O"�� ciry ofFRwwceo cuca`toNcn � �„ Left Elevation 'D' (Cottage) Right Elevation'D"(Cottage) �qq PLAN 4 RANCHO CHAFFEY .. ,,... TO ORDER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA D 1 Elevation 'A' (Spanish Colonia) Elevation W (Craftsman) ---E Fe—vation'C' (Farmhouse Elevation 'D' (Cottage) PLAN 4X RANCHO CHAFFEY 111"To ORDER CITY oFRANCHO cucnMoNca : 7D 3 7 Q J GREAT ROOM r I I I I I I I I KITCHEN I I i all 1 � I I I I 1 1 1 I GARAGE L_ I 1 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 �� II pyy�Ry I I II I 11 11 II II II II II 11 ROOMII 11 II II II II 11 II I X11 II II II DEN i n II BMW �l II I1 11 II II FLEX ' I g11W monae I � i P4R IIIMIL WR � PORfII I + 1 TOTK AREA ITIS 90 PT. ' I ' I I �q(g Second Flbor Plan 'A' First Floor Plan'A' PLAN aX �: L=�iui 9e" _,""tee.. RANCHO CHAFFEY N1B>I lima TO ORDER NTUR�p T�., CITY OF ItANC110 CUCAMONGA w I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 L i wRJn IY� 1, ; I I I 1 1 BEDROOM 1 ►fie. I BEDROOM _ - .4 _ M 1 ' hl ' I tlM/ll SIN/ I I I I I ' I ' 1 1 I 1 I 1 I � 1 I . L________________________ PaJ rtial Second Floor Plan'C' I 1 I I I I I I i 1 I I GARAGE I 1 � 1 I I I I I 1 I I 1 I i 1 ----------------------- Partial Second Floor Plan '13' ii Tn it 1 DEN 1 FLEX it I I II fENM II 11 11 I II lilt'--------TiiT--------- k1A Partial First Floor Plan'C' Partial First Floor Plan'B' PLAN 4X RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER I 1"1 a"a;�' CITI' OF RANCI IO CUCAMONGA 1 11 II 11 11PORCH 11 11 11 II 11 11 I II lilt'--------TiiT--------- k1A Partial First Floor Plan'C' Partial First Floor Plan'B' PLAN 4X RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER I 1"1 a"a;�' CITI' OF RANCI IO CUCAMONGA r-------------- Partial Second Floor Plan'D' Partial First Floor Plan'D' PLAN 4X RANCHO CHAFFEY CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 'A' Spanish Colonial 'B' Craftsman Roof Plans 'C' Farmhouse 'D' Cottage PLAN 4X RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER I ary of wwcuo cucuMoNCA :�. T D ,n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MIN Left--Elcvation4k'(Spanish Colonial) LJ II III III1 III Pn n. u�ui� . ill IIII _ _ .L ill _ ;;' illl IIII I 'III III' Front Elmition'A' , (Spanish -Colonial) RANCHO CHAFFEY PLAN 4X Left Elevation '13' (Craftsman) Front Elevation~B' (Craftsman) gy PLAN 4X M"T m'•" RANCHO CHAFFEYTO O CITY OF PANCHO CUCAMONGA """°^ Ilz I .... ��IINI-UivY'M CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Left Elevation IC' (Farmhouse) Front Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) RANCHO CHAFFEY PLAN 4X ,o.x. fiORri S-fTUIIY Left Elevation'D' (Cottage) Front Elevation 'D' (Cottage) PLAN 4X WT-tlORD RANCHO CHAFFEYO ER CITY OF RANCI 10 CUCAMONGA Left Elevation'A' (Spanish Colonial) millblulm �� F171 �Ijj Front Elevation'A' (Spanish Colonial) Right Elevation'A' (Spanish Colonial) Rear Elevation'A' (Spanish Colonial) PLAN 4 RANCHO CHAFFEY KW h (-TO ORDEF21 SOR` ±STORY CITY OF RANCt10 CUCAh10NGA a zu -+ v 3 I D Lett Elevation'B' (Crasoman) Right Elevation'B' (Crat sm-an) Front Elevation 'B' (Cratfsman) Rear Elevation 'B' (Craftsman) PLAN 4 i C RANCHO CHAFFEYItL7. TOORDER """° CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m 3 0 w Left Elevation'C'(Farmhouse) Right Elevation'C'(Farmhouse) CITY OF KANCI10 CUCAMONGA RANCHO CHAFFEY Front Elevation'C' (Farmhouse) Rear Elevation'B' (Cr saman) PLAN 4 Nwosa,. Ai, --- Le-fVtfevaiion' (Cottage) Right Elevation `D' (Cottage) RANCHO CHAFFEY mnwiaw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Front Elevationm'D' (Cottage) Rear Eevation'B' (Craftsman) PLAN 4 =�? 11111111111111 /////I 1111110+oc�o+oocc, Im 0 0+o+o�u+o+coo+o+o�u 1111111►1111111111 a t t t 1� t • t�♦ ♦ o+o.•o+u+o+o',� o, c 00000000000 ttt ♦tbt 11111111111111 /11111/I ll�oon000<. oldo+o'o+o+o+dclu+o 111111111111111111 ; ...� �_ �� ... �.. �....�.� _ ._.... -I\ ����. 11X•. EXHIBIT H ll�mmvxmw, 0 uoc 1 ' ' o _................ 0 0 �o 0 i E ila t EXHIBIT H ll�mmvxmw, 0 uoc Item D-133 1 _................ i Y Will IIRlt� ila o� looses W�o 31 °'Ogooe ,JIJ� Item D-133 �ff Z s� int ;p go nL—U uad-H -M, —A418"6AT8G—. A GFi =425 «;. .. m m `= * �® ♦ Z: ro r 1. ♦ 4 jj� �• to oO;Si:;i�;:•• • . � � 000 , ••••. 0 -M, —A418"6AT8G—. 9 s 1d31 M0138 338 aw H01Vq a i / M CHAW ROAD W 0 Z W a 7 Itam D-115 tt COMMUNITY TRAILW1616%ma ar - _ _ _ LOT 59 ... t _ -- - LOT 58 . :v r* -qYPSUM 081ve LOT 46 " - w +1 COMMUNITY TRAIL LOT 47 o e 0 GYPSUM QRN a LOT 22 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith January 28, 2014 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 - KB HOME - A review of a proposal for 76 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 76 -lot subdivision of about 53 acres within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. On November 9, 2011, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of a previous Negative Declaration. Background: A tentative tract map for the purpose of subdividing the property into seventy-six (76) lots for single-family residential development, filed by Chaffey Joint Union High School District, was approved for this project site by the Planning Commission on November 9, 2011 (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122). To date, the final map has not been recorded. The property has since been sold to KB Home for the development/construction of the homes. Site Characteristics: The project site is a vacant, rectangular -shaped property with an area of approximately 2.4 million square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 402,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south). The area of the lots that will comprise the above -noted subdivision range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet (the minimum lot area is 20,000 square feet). The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet (the minimum average lot area is 25;000 square feet). The depth of each lot will be at least 200 feet, and the width of each lot will meet the required 90 -foot dimension. All lots will be conventional, i.e. rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting. To the north and west of the project site, are single-family residences. To the south, is a vacant parcel owned by Caltrans and used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this parcel is the Foothill Freeway (SR -210). The properties to the east are vacant. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. General: The applicant proposes to construct a single-family residence on each lot of the above -noted subdivision for a total of seventy-six (76) single-family residences. The floor areas of the houses will range between 3,381 square feet (Plan 1) to 4,506 square feet (Plan 4). Thirty-eight (38) of the houses will be one-story, while the houses on the remainder of the lots will be two-story. This equates to 50 percent of the lots having single -story houses. This mix of one- and two-story homes is consistent with the policy adopted by the Planning Commission requiring that 25 percent (minimum) of the proposed houses be single -story. The garages of sixty-four (64) of the houses (60.6 percent of the total number of proposed houses) will be setback from the front part of the house or will not face towards the street, i.e., they are "side entry" garages. This will comply with Section 5.42:606. -of #h& Etiwanda-•SpeGific -Plan which requires that 50 percent of the garages be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes its visual presence (as seen from the street). The houses on all corner lots (Lots 1, 17, 20 through 23, 28, 29, 40, 41, 52, 53, 64, 65, and 76) will be single -story as required per Section 5.42.608 of the Etiwanda ® Specific Plan. EXHIBIT I Item D-138 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2013-00743 — KB HOME January 28, 2014 Page 2 The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in Section 5.42.600 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant proposes four (4) types of architectural themes (elevations) — Spanish, Colonial, Cottage, and Farmhouse. Each house will incorporate a variety of materials to varying degrees. Depending on the theme, the Colonial, Cottage, and Farmhouse will have a combination of stone veneer, board and batt siding, lap siding, and stucco finish. Because of the nature of the theme, the Spanish elevation will be exclusively finished with stucco. The roofing will be either flat or barrel concrete tile. Each house will have an articulated footprintifloor plan and profile. The applicant proposes four (4) distinct footprints — Plans 1, 2, 2x, 3, and 4 — and reverse footprints of each for a total of ten (10) footprints. Plans 1, 2, and 2x will be one-story while the others will be two-story. The number of available footprints will comply with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Because the footprints and profiles of each house differ, there will bw a variety of movement in the wall planes and roof lines. Each house will have a front entrance comprised of either an enclosed courtyard or a covered porch. Potential homeowners have the option of a casita attached to the house (Plan 2x). Depending on the theme, there will also be details such as wood brackets/rafters tails at the roof eaves, decorative trim and shutters around the windows, wrought iron accent features, corbels, molding along the top of the stone veneer wainscots, wood shingle siding, and decorative garage doors. Chimneys are not proposed. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Desian Review Committee Action: Staff presented a brief overview and background of the project and summarized the design characteristics of the proposed houses. The Committee generally accepted the proposal as submitted with some exceptions. The Committee directed the applicant to revise the Spanish Colonial themed _ elevations so' that'"they incorpo-rated" MY' ore features that are characteristic of "4aniifi Colonial architecture. The features that were requested include arched and/or recessed windows, shutters with curved top edges that match the corresponding arched window, and arched trim above the garage doors. The Committee requested that the stackstone veneer be comprised of blocks that were thicker, i.e. the vertical dimension of each stack should be increased. Also, the Committee requested that the applicant vary the type of rock veneers on the Craftsman themed elevations. The applicant proposed a Item D-139 • DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DRC2013-00743 — KB HOME January 28, 2014 Page 3 stackstone veneer for all houses that had the Craftsman theme. The Committee wanted the houses to have a stone veneer constructed of either fieldstone, river rock, brick, or stackstone veneer. The applicant was directed to revise the proposal as noted and submit the proposal for a follow-up review by the Committee prior to forwarding the application to the Planning Commission for review. Lastly, the Committee directed the applicant to add decorative windows on the garage doors. Members Present: Fletcher, Oaxaca, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith Item D-140 ® DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mike Smith March 4, 2014 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 - KB HOME: - A review of a proposal for 76 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 76 -lot subdivision of about 53 acres within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) - APNs: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. Related files: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance DRC2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Background: The proposed project was reviewed by the Committee on January 28, 2014. The Committee generally accepted the proposal as submitted with some exceptions. The Committee directed the applicant to do the following and submit the proposal for a follow-up review prior to forwarding the application to the Planning Commission for review (Exhibit A): 1. Revise the Spanish Colonial -themed elevations so that they incorporated more features that are characteristic of Spanish Colonial architecture. The features that were requested include arched and/or recessed windows, shutters with curved top edges that match the corresponding arched window, and arched trim above the garage doors; 2. Use stackstone veneer comprised of blocks that have a vertical dimension greater than originally proposed so that each stack is visually 'thicker'; • 3. Vary the type of rock veneers on the Craftsman -themed elevations. The applicant proposed a stackstone veneer for all houses that had the Craftsman theme. The Committee wanted the houses to have a stone veneer constructed of either fieldstone, river rock, brick, or stackstone veneer; and 4. Add decorative windows on the garage doors. Staff Comments: The applicant agreed to complete the revisions as directed by the Committee. With the exception of Revision #1 as listed above, the revisions can be included as conditions of approval and verified during review of the construction plans by Staff during plan check. Those conditions of approval will read as follows: The minimum vertical dimension of each stack of stackstone rows/blocks shall be 4 inches. 2. The rock veneers on the Craftsman themed elevations shall be varied so that the houses with this theme will have either fieldstone, river rock, brick, or stackstone veneer. The ratio of the veneers that are applied shall be equal throughout the subdivision, i.e. no particular veneer that is used shall be the dominant veneer. Adjoining Craftsman -themed houses shall not have the same type of veneer. 3. All garage doors shall have decorative windows that match the theme- of the corresponding -house. For Revision #1, the applicant has -prepared a new set of plans (for the Spanish Colonial theme only) showing the revisions as directed. Staff conducted a side-by-side comparison of the original and revised is plans and has concluded that the applicant has completed the revisions as discussed at the Design Review Committee meeting on January 28, 2014. The applicant has made the following revisions (staff EXHIBIT J Item D-141 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DR2013-00743 — KB HOME March 3, 2014 Page 2 will provide a set of both the original and revised plans and show the changes that were made -to the Committee during the meeting): 1. The majority of the windows that are located beneath a gable roof on all elevations have been revised so that the horizontal edge at the top of each window has been changed to an arc. 2. At windows there were proposed to be recessed into the building wall, then the horizontal soffit above the window now has been changed to an arched soffit. 3. At some of the windows that are located beneath a gable roof on all elevations, the top edge of the rectangular foam trim has been changed to include a curvilinear/arced top edge. 4. Where there were rectangular shutters at the above -noted windows, the shutters now have an arced top edge that 'reflects' the adjoining window. 5. At garages that are located beneath a gable roof, the top edge of the rectangular foam trim has been changed to include a curvilinear/arced top edge, or, if recessed, the top edge of the soffit is now arched. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved with the above -noted revisions incorporated by the applicant and those recommended by staff and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Design Review Committee.Action: The project as approved as presented with the direction of the Committee to add arches to the front entryway at the front elevations of Plans 1 and 1 x. Members Present: Fletcher, Granger Staff Planner: Mike Smith Item D-142 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part A Chapter 5 Item D-143 BASIC DEVELOPMENT ER STANDARDS Fig 5-2 VL L LM M LM** M** Lot Area: minimum average 40,000 25,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 6,000 6,000 (in square feet) minimum 30,000 20,000 10,000 7,200 7,200 5,000 5,000 (in square feet) Number of DU's 1/40,000 1/20,000 1/10,000 1/7,200 1/5,000 1/5,000 1/5,000 (per lot area in square 2 max/iot 2 max/lot 4 max/lot 4 max/lot feet) 4 max/lot Lot Dimensions: minimum depth 200' 200' 100' 100' 100' 90' 90' • minimum width (at required 120' 90' 80' 60' 60' 50' min. 50% of 50' min. 50% front setback) lots - 55' of lots - 55' min. min. minimum frontage 60'.", 40' 40' 40' 40'. 30' 30' (at front p.l.) Setbacks: front 40' 30' 25' 25' 25' 20' avg. 20' avg. vary ±5' vary t5' side (street) 25' 25' 15' 25' 25 15' 15' side 20/20 10/20 0`/20 0`/15 0'/15 0`/15 0`/15 Total 20' Total 15' Total 15' Total 15' Total 15' building separation 15' min. 15' min. except except where where adjacent adjacent 2 stories 2 stories- -20' min. 20' min. rear 60' 60' 25' 20' 20' 15' 15' Lot Coverage 20% 25% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% (maximum %) EXHIBIT K 5 -9 11/01 Item D-143 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part II, Chapter S * 0 lot line not to be used at project boundary *' These columns apply to parcels located within the Etiwanda South Overlay District (See Figure 5-1). ' Existing lots of record of 1 acre or less may be exempted from this requirement 2 Custom lot subdivisions may be exempted from this requirement. 5-10 Item D-144 8/96 ER " VL L. LM M:: LM On-site Windrows' 10072c.• 507ac ;::..-WR :._ :. N/R ;.Nli. w ;:; N/R (in lin. Feet/ac) Streetside Required Required Require . Required: 4 Re q wired R .eQwired:= .. _ , y.. Landscaping d (prior to occupancy)Z ::;• ::. �. r,�.r.°.' ;;. Height Limitations 35; 35 �`"=3" 35 3;-;, ` 35 3$ci:xr> * 0 lot line not to be used at project boundary *' These columns apply to parcels located within the Etiwanda South Overlay District (See Figure 5-1). ' Existing lots of record of 1 acre or less may be exempted from this requirement 2 Custom lot subdivisions may be exempted from this requirement. 5-10 Item D-144 8/96 ® STAFF REPORT PiANNINGDEPARTMEN'T Date: November 9, 2011 RANCHO To: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission CUCAMONGA From: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director By: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Subject: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) - APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Variance 2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. VARIANCE DRC2009-00020 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - A requestto allow perimeter walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in residential districts, for noise attenuation purposes along the perimeter of a proposed 76 -lot • subdivision with a combined area of about 53 acres in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) - APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2009-00224 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT: A request to remove trees in conjunction with a proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of about 53 acres into 76 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) - APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. Related files: Preliminary Review DRC2006-00793, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, and Variance DRC2009-00020. BACKGROUND: The applications were scheduled for review and action at the Planning Commission meeting to be conducted on May 25, 2011. However, during the week preceding the public hearing staff and the applicant received correspondence from various agencies (Exhibits L — 0) regarding the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) that was circulated per the notification and comment requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). These agencies concluded that more information was required and requested more documentation and/or data that would support the City's environmental determination. The public hearing was subsequently continued to the Planning Commission meeting on July 13, 2011. Shortly thereafter, it was deemed unlikely that there would be enough time to prepare for the July 13, 2011, Planning Commission public hearing. The Planning Commission public hearing was subsequently continued to a future, undetermined date. In the interim period since then, the applicant • and his consultant updated their environmental reports and analyses and submitted them to the City for EXHIBIT L Item D-145 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020, AND DRC2009-00224 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 2 review. Using these documents, staff revised the Initial Study to include additional data and revised the Mitigated Negative Declaration to include new mitigations. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were re -circulated as required per CEQA guidelines. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single -Family Residences (Part) and Grading/Construction of New Single -Family Residences (Part, Tract 17651); Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan South - Access road for San Bernardino Flood Control District and Foothill Freeway (SR -210) East - Vacant; Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan West - Single -Family Residences (Part) and Vacant (Part); Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan B. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential North - Very Low Residential South - n/a East - Very Low Residential West - Very Low Residential C. Site Characteristics: The project area consists of five (5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south) (Exhibit B). The site is vacant. There are numerous trees within and along the property lines of the individual parcels that comprise the project site. The eastern half of the combined property is mostly low vegetation. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is ongoing grading and construction of new homes (Related file: Tract 17651). To the west, are additional single-family residences and a single vacant parcel. To the south, is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this road, is the Foothill Freeway (SR -210). To the east, are vacant parcels. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Speck Plan (Exhibit C). The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast comers are approximately 1,455 feet and 1,400 feet, respectively. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into 76 lots for single-family residential development (Exhibit D). Development/construction of the homes following the subdivision of the property will be by others, as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so themselves. All of the lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure - 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required. The depth of each lot will be at least 200 feet, and the width of each lot will meet the required 90 -foot dimension. All of the lots will be conventional, i.e. rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting. Included in the proposal are several streets, including one that Item D-146 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020, AND DRC2009-00224 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 3 will link East Avenue and adjacent future residential development at Tract 17651 to the north and the vacant parcel to the east. As the subject property is located within the Equestrian Overlay, each lot will have a dedicated corral area of 24 feet by 24 feet for horse -keeping, and equestrian trails will be provided along the rear of each lot per Section 5.25.500 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Along the north perimeter of the project site, a 20 -foot wide Community Trail will be constructed per Figure 5-18 of the Etiwanda Speck Plan. From East Avenue to a point approximately 1,200 feet to the east, at the north side of Lots 47, 58, 59, 70, and 71, the alignment of the trail will be located entirely within the proposed subdivision. From that point to the northeast corner of the subject site, the alignment of the trail shifts northward, and only 8 feet of the required 20 feet width of the trail, at the north side of Lots 22, 23, 34, 35, and 46, will be within the proposed subdivision. The other 12 feet will be on the neighboring property to the north (Tract 17651). B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Etiwanda High School at 9161 Base Line Road on October 16, 2009 (Exhibit J). Several individuals from the surrounding community attended. None of them had any specific objections to the project. Most of the comments were related to off-site improvements as a result of the project including street widening, installation of utilities (natural gas and sewer), undergrounding of existing power lines, removal of trees, and construction of new walls (including the noise attenuation wall). The applicant answered these questions to the satisfaction of those present. Some of their • questions could not be answered because the subject of the inquiry, such as obtaining a connection to a natural gas line, could only be addressed by the applicable utility. There were concerns about impacts related to construction activity including fugitive dust and noise. Staff stated to the attendees that the applicant's proposal does not include house product, therefore, grading would be limited to rough grading, and there would not be any construction activity associated with this application. Nevertheless, there are mitigation measures that must be followed by developers to control dust and noise. Measures to control dust will include the use of a water truck to stabilize soil and prevent it from becoming airborne, ceasing construction during strong winds, and a variety of barriers to prevent water runoff. The principal means to control noise will be to limit the hours of construction. Staff also noted to the attendees that in the event such measures were not being followed, they could contact the City (or other agencies like the Air Quality Management District) to investigate the problem and, if there is a violation, require the applicant to correct the violation. C. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The Grading Review Committee (Addington and Miller) and Technical Review Committee reviewed the application on December 15, 2009. The Committees accepted the proposal and recommends approval. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. D. Design Review Committees: The Design Review Committee (Munoz, Wimberly, and Nicholson) reviewed -the... application. on -December. 9.5,._2009. (Exhibit. H). The Committee reviewed the- ----- proposed subdivision and accepted it as submitted after concluding that the design/layout of the tract is standard for the zoning district and area of the project site. The height of the noise attenuating walls was identified as standard for residential projects along the Foothill Freeway (SR -210). Staff indicated that the design and construction of the wall would be per Caltrans • standard. The Committee noted that the house product would be reviewed later when the developer of the site submitted the plans and that the opportunity for additional comments would Item D-147 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020, AND DRC2009-00224 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 4 occur at that time. The Committee's conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the application on December 9, 2009 (Exhibit 1). In general, the Committee reviewed the proposed subdivision and accepted it as submitted with several relatively minor revisions including enlarging the comer cut-offs at trail intersections, providing block walls along the perimeter of trails throughout the subdivision (instead of PVC fencing), and providing safety/identification signs and striping. The Committee also requested that staff research two (2) significant revisions relating to the proposed 20 -foot wide Community Trail. The first was the possibility of allowing horse -keeping related vehicles access to the trail, i.e. drive on it, to facilitate the movement of such horse -keeping related vehicles in a forward -facing direction through the trail system. The second was the planting of the replacement Eucalyptus windrow in order to enhance the aesthetics along the trail on the north side of the proposed north perimeter wall of the subdivision that will be located adjacent and parallel to the trail. Staff discussed the requests with the Engineering and Public Works Departments, and it was determined that neither request could be accommodated. The first request could not be granted as a) there was a potential for safety to be compromised because of motorized horse -keeping related vehicles sharing the same path of travel as pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian traffic, b) the surface of the trail was not designed to support such traffic and would be subject to damage, and c) motorized horse -keeping related vehicles are not permitted on the Community Trail system anywhere else in the City. The second request could not be granted as long-term maintenance including tree pruning and watering would become the sole responsibility of the City. At a follow-up meeting with the Committee on September 8, 2010, alternate solutions were discussed. The Committee agreed to the two following solutions: 1)to address the first request, hammerhead turnarounds would be provided at the north ends of each north to south segment of Local Trails that intersect with the Community Trail to permit horse -keeping related vehicles to reverse direction (these will match the turnarounds near the east and west termini of the east to west trail along the south perimeter of the subdivision), and 2) to address the second request, the Eucalyptus windrow would be planted adjacent and parallel to the Local Trail and wall that will be located along the south perimeter of the subdivision. At this meeting, there was additional discussion regarding the wall along the rear of each property and its design. The applicant and the Committee agreed that the wall would be comprised of a solid lower portion constructed of decorative blocks and an open upper portion constructed of wrought iron fencing. These solutions and the Committee's other conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. F. Variance DRC2009-00020: The applicant submitted a Variance to allow the construction of noise attenuating walls along the south, east, and west perimeters of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height (Exhibit F). Noise attenuation walls were identified as the principal means for mitigating noise impacts generated by traffic on East Avenue and the Foothill Freeway (SR -210), according to the noise study prepared by Mestre Greves Associates on October 9, 2008. P.er..Sectim-174=060(K.) of. the Development.—Code, the- maximum heighI of--wallsr-,permitted• irr - residential districts is 6 feet. The proposed walls will be approximately 6 to 15.5 feet above the pad elevations of the lots adjoining the walls as seen from the interior of the subdivision. Depending on the location, some walls will be constructed over retaining walls, i.e. a combination wall. Therefore, as seen from the outside, the height of the walls will be greater. The general area where the walls will be highest is near the southeast comer of the subdivision at Lot 16 where the wall, as seen from the freeway, will be approximately 22 feet high. Item D-148 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020, AND DRC2009-00224 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 • Page 5 Facts for Findings: The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards. In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The following are facts to support the necessary findings: 1. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specked regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. Fact/s: The proposed walls are for noise attenuation purposes to reduce the exterior noise levels at the lots along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision. The height of the walls is necessary to mitigate the noise impacts to a level that is less than 65 dBA CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level) as specified in the Development Code. If the walls were limited to 6 feet as specified in the Code, or if the walls were absent altogether, the exterior noise levels would not comply with the Code, nor be consistent with Public Health and Safety policies relating to noise (Goal PS -13 of the General Plan). There is no practical alternative to walls that will achieve the desired noise attenuation. 2. Finding : That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply • generally to other properties in the same zone. Facts: The project site is located approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) at the east side of East Avenue. As a result, it is exposed to noise generated by traffic that is generally not present near other residential properties in the City which are screened by existing development and/or sufficiently distant from these principal noise sources that noise impacts are negligible. 3. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Facts: The purpose of the walls is to attenuate traffic noise. The exterior noise levels generated by traffic exceed the maximum limits established by the Development Code and would negatively affect a future homeowner's ability to enjoy and use the outdoor areas of his property in the absence of these walls. Furthermore, the effectiveness of noise attenuating materials used in the construction of the homes is augmented by the presence of the noise attenuating perimeter wall. The absence of the wall would reduce the effectiveness of noise mitigation measures and expose the occupants of the homes to elevated interior noise. ...___4.:.: Finding: That the—granting-of -the•.Variance. .will._not. constitute a grant" of special - privilege --inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact/s: The Foothill Freeway (SR -210) corridor within the City is adjacent to numerous • residential properties. Traffic noise impacts along the corridor must be mitigated to levels as described in the Development Code and consistent with the General Plan. The freeway corridor abuts various residential zoning districts including the Item D-149 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020, AND DRC2009-00224 - CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 6 Very Low (VL) Residential District. Walls of this height or similar are common along the freeway corridor for noise attenuation purposes where residential properties are adjacent to the freeway. 5. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Facts: The height of the walls as seen from East Avenue, will be 6 feet and will not be adjacent to any private property. In addition to appearing to have the typical height of a perimeter wall, the wall along with associated landscaping will be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The height of the wall as seen from the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) will be similar to the height of other noise attenuation walls along the freeway corridor within the City. This wall will be constructed per the decorative design established by Caltrans. The properties adjacent to the wall along the east perimeter of the proposed subdivision are vacant. This wall will be constructed of decorative block per the City's Design Guidelines. Upon development of the properties to the east of Lots 17 to 22, any residential structures, in compliance with the minimum rear yard setback standard, will be at least 60 feet from the wall. The lot immediately to the east of Lot 16 will likely have a matching pad elevation when it is developed to match the proposed subdivision (for grading, street alignment, and drainage purposes). Therefore, the retaining portion of the wall (approximately 7.5 feet in height) as seen from this lot would be buried, reducing the visible height of the wall. G. Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224: The existing trees throughout the site will be removed as necessary, and a replacement Eucalyptus tree windrow will be planted with a spacing of 8 feet on center per Section 5.41.501 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant has submitted a Tree. Removal Permit for the removal of these trees. A set of replacement Eucalyptus windrows will be planted along the entire south perimeter and part of the east perimeter of the subdivision (Exhibit G). Originally, the windrow was to be installed along the north perimeter of the subdivision but was relocated to address the revisions requested by the Trails Advisory Committee, as noted above. H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to biological resources, hydrology and water quality, noise, and air quality, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, Staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. During this comment period Staff and the applicant received correspondence from various agencies such as the South Coast Air Quality y_ Management :Djstrict- (A-QMfJ),. Department of • Fish- -and- Game. (DR%,-Galiforn egional-Water Quality Control Board, and the Army Corp of Engineers. These agencies concluded that more information was required and requested more documentation and/or data that would support the City's environmental determination. The applicant and his consultant updated their environmental documents and analyses and submitted them to the City for review. Using these documents staff revised the Initial Study to include additional data relating to, and discussing, greenhouse gas emissions, air quality associated health risks, biological habitat, and jurisdictional waters. Similarly, i+om n -i Sn PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18122, DRC2009-00020, AND DRC2009-00224 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 7 the Mitigated Negative Declaration was revised to include new mitigations. The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were re -circulated as required per CEQA guidelines. The draft Resolutions of Approval were revised accordingly. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. No additional correspondence has been received other than the above -noted agency requests for more information related to the environmental documents. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance DRC2009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 by the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions and issuance of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. Respectfully submitted, r100-- k - Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director • JRT:MS/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo Exhibit C - Site Utilization Map Exhibit D - Conceptual Master Plan/Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 Exhibit E - Grading Plan and Sections Exhibit F - Preliminary Wall and Fence Plan Exhibit G - Preliminary Tree Removal and Windrow Replacement Plan Exhibit H - Design Review Committee Action Comments (December 15, 2009) Exhibit I - Trails Advisory Committee Action Comments (December 9, 2009 and December 8, 2010) Exhibit J - Neighborhood Meeting Summary (prepared by the Applicant) Exhibit K - Planning Commission Staff Report (excerpt) (May 25, 2011) Exhibit L - Correspondence from South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Exhibit M - Correspondence from California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) Exhibit N - Correspondence from California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) Exhibit 0 - Correspondence from United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACOE) Exhibit P - Initial Study Parts I and II .."._ Draft Resolution,gfApp,Lova,L.forJejl.axiye_.Tract_Map SUBTT18.122.,_.......... Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2009-00020 w Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 0 • RESOLUTION N0, 11-56 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 TO SUBDIVIDE FIVE (5) VACANT PARCELS WITH A COMBINED AREA OF ABOUT 53 ACRES INTO 76 LOTS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, ABOUT 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY (SR -210); AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0225-191-03,04,13,15, AND 20. A. Recitals. 1. Chaffey Joint Union High School District (Chaffey JUHSD) filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 9th day of November 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. is B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced meeting on November 9, 2011, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant project site located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210); and b. The project area consists of five (5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south); and C. To the north of the western half of the project site, there are single-family residences. To the north of the eastern half of the site, there is ongoing grading and construction of new homes (Related file: Tract 17651). To the west, are additional single-family residences and a single vacant parcel. To the south, is a road used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District -for access to their facilities. further to the east. Beyond this road; 'r! th*"Fd61hill°Freeway (SR -210). To the east, are vacant parcels; and d. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) • Residential District, of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and Itom n-1 S7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 2 e. The proposal is to subdivide the property into 76 lots for single-family residential development. Development/construction of the homes following the subdivision of the property will be by others, as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so themselves; and f. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas will range between 21,780 square feet to 36,890 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,230 square feet, which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required; and g. This application is in conjunction with Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced meeting and upon the speck findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property consisting of five (5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350,000 square feet (53 acres) into 76 lots for single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential. b. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Speck Plan. except for the proposed noise attenuation walls along the perimeter of the proposed subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet in height. The applicant has submitted a Variance request for consideration by the Planning Commission. The proposed development, otherwise, meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: 4.--Purs'uanl to th"e California Environmental Quality Act (°CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Itam n-1 S:t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 3 Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department • of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the subdivision of a project site consisting of five (5) parcels with a combined area of approximately 2,350;000 square feet (53 acres) and with overall dimensions of approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south) located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) -APN: 0225-191-03, 04, 13, 15, and 20. 2) Development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Very Low (VL) Residential District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building.Code, or any other City Ordinances. 4) Prior to recordation of the Final Map, all lots shall be rough graded to include building pads and interim improvements (for example, • drainage) as deemed necessary by the City. Itpm r)-154 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 4 5) Prior to construction, all future homes and associated improvements shall require the review and approval by the City and the issuance of applicable Building Permits by the Building and Safety Department. The site plotting and architecture of these homes (and accessory structures) shall require the submittal of a Development Review application for Design Review Committee and Planning Commission review and approval. 6) Although a phasing plan has been submitted, this plan is conceptual as the applicant does not propose to construct the single-family residences and specific details of the phasing plan cannot be provided. Therefore, the eventual developer of the project site shall include a comprehensive phasing plan with the submittal of any Development Review application. 7) All setback lines shall be shown on the Final Map. 8) Equestrian uses and improvements shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the properties within the Equestrian Overlay as described in Development Code Section 17.08 and the Trail Implementation Master Plan. 9) Enlarge the comer cut-offs at the intersection of the north to south and the east to west trails at Lots 15 and 16 so that they are 20 feet by 20 feet (instead of 10 feet by 10 feet). 10) Provide missing comer cut-off at the right-angle tum of the trail, located at Lot 17. 11) Drainage concrete V ditches shall be no more than 6 inches deep and a minimum of 5 feet wide with a medium broom finish. 12) The walls located at the rear of each lot and adjacent to the equestrian trails shall be comprised of a 2 -foot high solid lower portion constructed of decorative blocks and a 4 -foot high open upper portion constructed of wrought iron fencing. The fence pickets shall have a maximum spacing of 2 inches. Final design and construction details including materials shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director. 13) Provide PVC trail fencing at the south side of Lot 76. 14) Increase the width of the trail entrance at Lots 17 and 76 to facilitate vehicle access. 15) Provide.stdping.in..the street and signage at all horse trail crossings. 16) Reduce the length, and eliminate interim turnarounds of the east to west trail segments behind Lots 1 and 16. Item n-1 SS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 5 17) Provide trail signage for the Community Trail at all trail intersections per City standards. 18) The noise attenuation wall along the south perimeter of the subdivision parallel to the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) shall be constructed per Caltrans standard. 19) The wall along the west perimeter of the subdivision, parallel to East Avenue shall be constructed per the decorative design shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 20) A neighborhood entry incorporating special landscape and design treatment per Figure 5-10 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan shall be provided at the southwest corner of the project site, near the northeast corner of the East Avenue overpass and the Foothill Freeway (SR -210). 21) All trail surfacing shall be of decomposed granite with 4 -inch minimum base. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. The decomposed granite shall be the complete width of the trail up to the Property boundary. • 22) Provide City Standard "Unauthorized Vehicles Prohibited" signs at each street trail connection. The minimum dimension between the wood posts for a step through detail is 18 inches clear minimum between posts and maximum 14 inches above grade. 23) A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and. weed control in accordance with City Master Trail drawings shall be submitted for City Trails Coordinator review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and Grading Plans. The developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices in conjunction with street improvements. 24) All Conditions of Approval for Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 shall apply. Building and Safety (Grading) Department 1) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross -lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 2) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall Provide hard -lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. • Item 0-156 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 6 3) Prior to removing fences or walls, along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines, the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4) All cross -lot drainage easements shall be concrete per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements. 5) The rough grading and precise grading plans shall include an exhibit showing the locations of all Water Quality Management Plan Best Management Practices (BMPs). 6) All equestrian trails shall be constructed with a 2 percent cross -slope draining to a concrete swale. 7) In the equestrian trails water, bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Trail Slope Water Bar Interval Spacing 4% to 5.99% 50 feet 6% to 8.99% 40 feet 9% to 11.99% 30 feet 12% andgreater 20 feet 8) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall submit a master private sewage disposal (septic) system plan for the entire project and each lot. 9) All proposed private sewage disposal (septic) systems shall be located in the front yard of each lot to allow for future connections to public sanitary sewer system located within the public street(s). 10) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit and approval of the Water Quality Management. Plan, the applicant shall provide a waste discharge identification number (WDID) on the title sheet of the Grading and Drainage Plan. 11) Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall record a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan." Enaineerina Department 1) East Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Secondary Arterial" standards as required including: Item r1_1S7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 7 a) Curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, 5 -foot sidewalk, and ADA access ramps. b) Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size, shall be of a species and spaced per the street tree table in the Standard Conditions. Install street trees per the LMD plans, rather than street improvement plans. c) No residential driveways to East Avenue. d) Provide traffic striping and signage, as required. e) Provide R26(S), "No Stopping" signs along frontage. f) Provide 9500 lumen HPSV streetlights. g) Relocate existing catch basin north of "A" Street. h) Provide gated access for City maintenance vehicles to the interior Community Trail per City Standard 1006-A, including drive approach. All concrete that crosses the trails shall be medium broom finish. 2) Install Landscape Maintenance District improvements along project frontage on East Avenue. • a) East Avenue improvements shall conform to Figures 5-28 and 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Provide a 30 -inch rock wall at the back of sidewalk wherever perimeter walls jog 10 feet behind the sidewalk. The minimum sidewalk width adjacent to walls shall be 5 feet. b) Provide a concrete header to clearly delineate where public maintenance ends and private homeowner maintenance begins. c) A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval. The perimeter landscaped parkways shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. d) Dedicate Lots C and D to the City for public landscape purposes. 3) Process an application to vacate the extra, tapered right-of-way along the frontage of East Avenue at Lots 1 and 76. 4) When perimeter walls turn the comer onto "A" Street, a landscape strip should still be provided between the wall and sidewalk on the corner side yard of Lot 76. Provide at least 5 feet if trees will be planted there. Corner side yards will be maintained by the homeowners. 5) The Community Trails shall also be annexed into Landscape Maintenance District No. 7. Item D-158 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 8 a) The Community Trail on the north property line of Lots 47, 58, 59, 70, and 71 shall be installed per Standard Drawing 1004, in a separate Lot "A" dedicated to the City. Access to East Avenue shall be per East Avenue conditions above. b) The Community Trail on the north property line of Lots 22, 23, 34, 35 and 46 shall be installed per Standard Drawing 1002-A. Tract 17651 has already recorded and will either partially install the trail (12 of 20 feet) or pay a contribution in lieu of construction. This developer shall install or reconstruct the parkway community trail full width along Gypsum Place. If Tract 17651 is not completed for some reason, install a minimum 12 -foot wide trail outside the north perimeter wall, with storm runoff protection, for portions without a street adjacent. c) Drainage facilities shall protect Community Trails from runoff. (Adjacent streets can serve that purpose also.) Provisions shall be made for potential excessive siltation of public storm drains from such drainage facilities. d) Install "pass-through" barriers (Standard Drawing 1007-B) at intersections between local and Community Trails. Install "Vehicle Gate with pass-through" barriers (Standard Drawing 1006-A) at intersections between streets and Community Trails. If directed by the Planning Director, provide "Vehicle Gate with pass-through" barriers (Standard Drawing 1006-B or -C) at intersections between streets and local trails. e) Parkway Community Trails can be shown on street improvement plans. Include a trail plan for the interior Community Trail with the East Avenue LMD plans. 6) Revise Drawing 2219, prepared for Tract 17651, to include full width parkway Community Trail on the south side of Gypsum Drive. 7) All internal streets are to be improved in accordance with City "Local Street" standards including: a) Local Streets per the Etiwanda Specific Plan shall have a 60 -foot right-of-way with sidewalks on both sides. b) Local Rural Streets per the Etiwanda Specific Plan allow for a 55 -foot right-of-way with a sidewalk on one side only. Local Rural Streets are appropriate for cul-de-sacs. The sidewalk shall and at a drive approach. c) Provide curb and gutter, sidewalk, drive approaches, street _ pavement, curbside drain outlets, and ADA access ramps. d) Provide cross gutters across Street "A" at Street "B" and across Street "F" at Street "G," only. All remaining intersections, including those at East Avenue and at Gypsum Drive, shall have adjacent catch basins intercepting gutter runoff. Itam r)-1 SQ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 9 e) Provide 5800 Lumen HPSV street lights. f) Provide traffic striping and signage including "All -Way Stop" signs at the intersections of "A" Street with "D" Street and "F" Street. g) Provide street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size, of a species and spaced per the street tree table in the Standard Conditions. 8) It is City Council policy that no tract shall have lots more than 600 feet from two means of access. Therefore, the streets of Tentative Tract 17651 connecting to Banyan Street must be completed before Building Permits can be issued for the bulk of your lots. Streets can be constructed by the Tract 17651 developer or by you. a) Tract Map 17651 has recorded, therefore, the right-of-way is available for the Banyan -connecting streets. b) You may request a reimbursement agreement to recover the cost for ultimate permanent off-site improvements from future development. If you fail to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights to reimbursement shall terminate. is Only ultimate permanent street improvements are eligible for developer -to -developer reimbursement. 9) Temporary fencing at the ends of streets stubbed for future extension shall extend beyond the street right-of-way, to perimeter wall corners on side yards or building setback lines on front yards. 10) Master Plan Storm Drains for Area 5 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy are already in place. No reimbursement is applicable to this Master Plan Storm Drain. The developer is responsible for reimbursing his fair share of the costs for Tract 17651 constructing local storm drains to the Victoria Basin Master Plan Storm Drain System. 11) The cost of additional local storm drains connecting to the Victoria Basin Master Plan Storm Drain System shall be bome by development with no fee credit or developer -to -developer reimbursement. a) Only closed system storm drains shall be constructed — once in a pipe, flows shall remain in pipes until discharging to concrete channels. b) All sump catch basins and laterals shall be designed to handle two times_.Q100... ..._.. c) All storm drains in Street "A" shall be designed for Q100. d) Extend the local storm drain system as far on-site as needed to contain Q25 within tops of curbs, Q100 within rights-of-way, and • provide a 10 -foot dry lane in Q10. Itom rl_1An PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 10 e) Dedicate a 25 -foot wide public storm drain easement on the final Tract Map when the diameter of the pipe is 60 inches or greater, otherwise the easement shall be 12 feet wide. 12) All interior street runoff is to be collected by the local storm drain system. 13) Vehicular access to private local trails shall be from Local Streets only. a) Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs, or other diversionary devices shall be used. Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street, the trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalkistreet. Provide curbside drain outlets for adjacent drainage devices. b) Where private cross -lot drainage facilities discharge to the public streets, inlets to curbside drain outlets, or public storm drains shall be designed to function. (not become blocked) in the absence of regular maintenance. Show the private inlets on the public improvement plans for reference. 14) Driveway on Lot. 1 shall be located as far as possible from the East Avenue intersection curb return. The corner side yard walls and slopes shall not encroach on the intersection line -of -sight. 15) The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical, except for the 66 kV electrical) shall be undergrounded along the entire project frontage as follows. a) Overhead utilities on the project side of East Avenue, extending to the first poles off-site (north and south), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. All services crossing East Avenue shall be undergrounded at the same time. b) Overhead utilities on the project side of Foothill Freeway (SR -210), along FCD access road to San Sevaine basin outlet, extending to the first poles off-site (east and west), prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. c) The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (or redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement within 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights of the developer to reimbursement shall terminate. Itcm r)—ifil • PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 11 d) Provide a separate 8112 -inch by 11 -inch drawing of the existing utility poles per Section B of the "Existing Overhead Utility Requirements" Engineering Department handout along with the reimbursement agreement application. 16) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross -lot drainage (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). Rough grading plan showing all slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be approved prior to final map approval. 17) Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to Building Permit issuance. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating • condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any grading permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low -emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or.high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, ..contractors shall include the following provisions: Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. Itcm n -1F7 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 12 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. + Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24 -inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter (PM,o) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions.. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel -powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction -grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) Landscape with native and/or drought -resistant species to reduce water consumption and to provide passive solar benefits. 11) Provide lighter color roofing and road materials and tree planning programs to comply with the AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC -01 measure. 12) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate high- efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 13) All residential structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. 14) All new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District's Rule 445, Wood Item n—IFR PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 13 Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce emissions of PM2.5 and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor wood burning devices (i.e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development on or after March 9, 2009. Biological Resources 1) The applicant shall purchase at a 1:1 ratio 2.9 acres of Riversidean alluvial fan sage scrub RAFSS habitat designated for conservation or pay in -lieu fees. Evidence of applicable mitigation agreements approved by CDFG shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of grading permits. 2) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the presence/absence of the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR) following protocols established by the United States Fish and Wild Life Services (USFWS) prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event that SBKR is detected or observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall be developed and implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the FESA (or Section 7 as appropriate). Mitigation measures shall include the purchase/conservation of off-site suitable • habitat that is known to support SBKR at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide copies of applicable species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. 3) The applicant shall conduct focused surveys to determine the Presence/absence of the California Gnatcatcher (CAGN) following Protocols established by the USFWS prior to grading or other ground disturbance of the site. In the event that CAGN is detected or observed within the area of disturbance, avoidance, minimization, and/or mitigation measures shall be developed and implemented through consultation with the USFWS under Section 10 of the FESA (or Section 7 as appropriate), Mitigation measures shall include the timing of construction activities outside of the breeding season (February 15 to August 31) and/or purchase/conservation of off-site suitable habitat that is known to support CAGN at a minimum 1:1 ratio depending on the quality of habitat removed compared to the quality of habitat provided. Specific ratios will be determined in consultation with USFWS. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the developer shall provide copies of applicable species mitigation agreements or permits to the City. 4) If vegetation removal, soil disturbance, or any other construction related activity is to occur during the avian nesting season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting survey shall be conducted prior to initiation of construction. If nests are discovered, Item D-164 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 14 they should be avoided by an appropriate buffer, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and left the nest, then construction in the area could resume. If initial ground disturbing activities or site clearing is proposed to occur outside of the nesting season (September 1 through January 31), then a preconstruction survey would not be required and construction could commence unimpeded. 5) The applicant shall prepare a mitigation plan containing provisions requiring the transplantation and/or seeding of Plummer's mariposa lily plants to an off-site protected area suitable for supporting Plummer's mariposa lily. The number of transplants/seeding shall be equal or greater than the 175 plants existing on the property. This mitigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City prior to the issuance of grading permits and shall be done in coordination with the CDFG. 6) Necessary permits from the relevant regulatory agencies (CDFG, RWQCB) must be obtained for impacts to jurisdictional features and/or waters. Required permits will likely include Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement and processing a Report of Waste Discharge Requirements. Grading in non -jurisdictional areas of the site may be allowed prior to obtaining the permits, provided that such grading will not impact jurisdictional waters. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall provide evidence of applicable permits to the City. 7) Trees that. are removed shall be replaced on a one-to-one basis with a matching species of a minimum 15=gallon size. 8) Tree planting shall follow the requirements established in the Etiwanda Specific Plan regarding windrow replacement. Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the. archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Itam n-1F,r, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 15 • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Prepare a mitigation plan consistent with Section 21083.2 Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, including but not limited to, avoiding archaeological sites, capping or covering sites with soil, planning the site as a park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation • monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth -disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth -disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare,. identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils The site shall be treated with water or other soil -stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM,a emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re -planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. • Item D-166 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 16 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil -stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. Greenhouse Gases 1) The project must comply with all rules that assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAWIWD Rule 403 regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other soil -stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as quickly as possible. 2) The construction contactor shall select construction equipment based on low -emission factors and high energy efficiency and submit a statement on the grading plan that ensures all construction equipment will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufactures specification. 3) Trucks shall not idle continuously for more than 5 minutes. 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall be utilized in lieu of gasoline- or diesel -powered engines where feasible. 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak -hour traffic. 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives shall be supported and encouraged for construction crew. 7) To conserve water and to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the California Air Resources Board Scoping Plan, the following measures shall be implemented: The installation of recycled water irrigation systems, i.e. dual distribution systems, is required to allow for future use of recycled water. Low flow appliances, i.e. toilets, dishwashers, showerheads, washing machines, etc, shall be installed if provided by the builder. Item D-167 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 17 A minimum of 50 percent of the landscape palette shall contain drought -resistant species. Turf (grass) shall not be used as a landscape feature in the common/public/shared areas; however, turf is allowed in the activity areas(s) in community parks (if any). The quantity of grass/turf shall be limited to a maximum of 30 percent of the landscaped portion in the front yards. There shall be no minimum amount of grass/turf imposed anywhere on the site. 8) The project shall incorporate enough points to be certified in Build -it -Green (builditgreen.org) or Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED). However, the project does not need to be officially 'certified' to reduce cost associated with the certification. 9) The project shall incorporate the following measures to reduce energy use: • Plant shade trees within 40 feet of the south side or within 60 feet • of the west sides of properties. • All units shall be constructed to be able to easily convert to solar power, i.e. solar ready. C • Photovoltaic cells (solar panels), tankless water heaters, and solar powered water heaters shall be offered to the homebuyers as an option, or installed. • Each appliance, i.e. washers, dryers refrigerators, stoves, etc. provided by the builder must be Energy Star qualified if an Energy Star designation is applicable for that appliance. 10) The following measures shall be included in the site plan to reduce motor vehicle emissions and to be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan: There is a Class II Bike Lane on East Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga's General Plan Bicycle Plan. The project shall contribute 100 percent of the funds the City required to construct a Class II Bike Lane on the eastern portion of East Avenue adjacent to the project or the project applicant shall construct it. The project shall include appropriate and safe bicycle connections from the Bike Lane on East Avenue to the project site. Item D-168 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 16 • There shall be pedestrian sidewalks on both sides of the streets in the project site. • The project shall install a pedestrian sidewalk on the eastern portion of East Avenue adjacent to the project site. • The project shall contain pedestrian connections to the uses adjacent to the project site. 11) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or manufactured locally. Use "Green Building Materials" such as materials that are resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way including low -volatile -organic -compound (VOC) materials. 12) Design all buildings to exceed Califomia Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination. of: • Increased insulation, • Limit air leakage through the structure, • Incorporate Energy Star or better rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment, light fixtures, and appliances, • Landscape and developed site utilizing shade, prevailing winds and landscaping, • Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems, • Install light colored 'cool" roofs and cool pavements, • Install solar or light emitting diodes (LED's) for outdoor lighting. 13) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the project and include the following: • Install water efficient landscapes and irrigation systems and devices in compliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance. • Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project. if available and/or install the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water. • Design building to be water efficient by installing water efficient fixtures and appliances including low flow faucets, dual flush toilets, and waterless urinals/water heaters. Item D-169 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 • TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 19 Design irrigation to control runoff and to remove water to non- vegetated surfaces. 14) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and green waste in public areas. Educate employees about reducing waste and about recycling. Hazards and Waste Materials 1) The project shall comply with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code (CBC), which includes building standards for the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The standards call for the use of ignition -resistant materials and design to inhibit the intrusion of flame or burning embers projected by a vegetation fire and help reduce losses resulting from repeated cycles of interface fire disasters. Hydrology and Water Quality 1) Prior to issuance of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during • construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specked time frame. a) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. b) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. C) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared on October 20, 2008, by the applicant's representative to reduce • pollutants during construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. Item D-170 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 20 3) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by the applicant's representative on October 20, 2008, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 4) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. 5) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying BMPs that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 6) Prior to issuance of grading or paving Permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Dischargers Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise 1) Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, a construction -related noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction. 2) The applicant shall construct an 8 -foot — 22 -foot high noise barrier block wall along the south, east, and west perimeters of the project site for noise attenuation purposes. The height and location of these walls shall be constructed per Exhibit 7 of the Preliminary Noise Assessment. These walls shall be fully constructed simultaneously with the development of the site and prior to occupancy of any of the homes. 3) When an application for the development of homes on the project site is submitted, the applicant (current or future) shall submit a noise Item D-171 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 ® TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 21 assessment to determine the required mitigations measures to reduce the noise impacts to levels of less significance. 4) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 5) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. The developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17,02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 6) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in the first phase. • 7) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2011. PLANNING COMMIS$93N OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: -Z Luis Munoz, Jr.,Chairma • ATTEST:+Jam oyer, AICP,..Sec tary Item D-172 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 11-56 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18122 — CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT November 9, 2011 Page 22 I, James R. Troyer, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 9th day of November 2011, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: NONE Item D-173 • • • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: ' SUBTT18122 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP APPLICANT: CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL LOCATION: FREEWAY (SR -210) - APN: 0225-191-03,-04,-11,-15. AND 20 ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, tc relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No, 11-56, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. I The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration - $ 2,094.00 X B. Time Limits This tentative tract map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a - complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years froiiiftfie date of the approval. SC -12-08 I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMM12011 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc Item D-174 Project No.SUBTT18122 Comoletion Date C. Site Development The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include site plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance prior to occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 7. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination ofconcrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 8. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 9. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements and the submitted fence/wall plan approved with this Tract Map. a. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official b. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24 -foot by 24 -foot corral with appropriate fencing. 10. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 2 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122SWCond 11-9.doc Item D-175 _1_/ Project No. SUBTT18122 Completion Date • 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 13. Construct decorative block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines). 14. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC within steel — frames. 15. Return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 16. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5 -foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5 -foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 17. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. — — — • D. Environmental 1. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off-site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation — — to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 4. Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cost of .implementing said measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to — — post cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount of $ 557 prior to the issuance of building permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These funds may be used by the City to retain • I:IPLANNINGIFINALIPLNGCOMMt2011 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc Item D-176 Project No. SUBrN8122 Completion Date consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measures. Failure to complete all actions required by the approved environmental documents shall be considered grounds for forfeit. E. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) F. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of the main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water arid waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (SUBTT18122) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineees stamp and "ger' signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can _/ 1 contact the Building and Safety Department staff for information and submittal requirements. ., (:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGC0MM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc Item D-177 Project No. SUBTri8122 Comcletion Date G. Site Development I. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (SUBTT18122). The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Califomia Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, Construction and Demolition Diversion Program deposit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance. 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. 4. For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all supportive information, shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department of -- Environmental Health and submitted to the Building Official prior to the issuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prior to issuance of building permits. 5. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. H. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the California Building Code (CBC) for property line clearances • considering use, area, and fire -resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. I. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the I time of application for grading plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of _ combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. • I:IPLANNINGIFINAUPLNGCOMM12011 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc Item D-178 Project No. SUBTT18122 Completion Date J. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT, (GRADING) (909) 477.2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED K. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross -lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights=of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on East Avenue 38 total feet on Gypsum Drive 3. Comer property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 4. Private drainage easements for cross -lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 5. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit -claimed or delineated on the final map. M. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall'include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGC0MM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SU8TT18122StdCond 11-9.doc Item D-179 i Project No._SUBTT18122 92MQIeti2n Date Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & Name Gutter East Avenue X A.C. Pvmt X Side- walk X Drive Appr. (e) Street Lights X !Street s Comm Trail Median Island BikeStreet Trell Other Gypsum Drive X X X motes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. (e) for community trail only. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. C. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and • interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 0 I:\PLANNING\FINAL\PLNGCOMM\2011 Res & Stf Rpt\SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc Project No. SUBTTIS122 Completion Date 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet (typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The Engineering Services Department reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Construction notes Tor street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be fumished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3j All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District East Avenue, community trails 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non -irrigated surfaces. 3. Install a connection to the Cucamonga Valley Water District — Inland Empire Utilities Agency recycled water line in East Avenue for use irrigating the public landscape area being constructed. 4. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 8 I:IPLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM12011 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc Itpm r)—IRI Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size Qty. East Avenue Magnolia NCN 8' 30' 15 Gal Fill Foreground tree grandiflora O.C. in 'D.D. Blanchard East Avenue Geijera parviflora Austrailian Willow 5' 20' 15 Gal Fill Background tree O.C. in in larger planters Provide Street Select appropriate tree from the approved street tree list for Rancho Fill Name Cucamonga. List each street as a separate line item within this legend. in Construction notes Tor street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be fumished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3j All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 7. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. N. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District East Avenue, community trails 2. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non -irrigated surfaces. 3. Install a connection to the Cucamonga Valley Water District — Inland Empire Utilities Agency recycled water line in East Avenue for use irrigating the public landscape area being constructed. 4. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 8 I:IPLANNINGIFINAL\PLNGCOMM12011 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc Itpm r)—IRI Project No. SUB 18122 _C�mnle, ti_ on pate ® 5. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. — 6. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: East Avenue theme wall. O. Drainage and Flood Control 1. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone n designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain a Zone "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 2. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 3. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 4. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. P. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, • electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 2. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all permit issuance if no map is involved. new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building • 1:1PLANNINGIFINALIPLNGC0MM12011 Res & Stf Rpt1SUBTT18122StdCond 11-9.doc Itam n -1R7 Project No. SUgJJJ122 Comoletion Date 2. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD -1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD -2 shall be submitted to -the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE. SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED 10 1APLANNINWINAUPLN000M2011 Res $ Stf RptISUBTT18122StdCond 11-g.doc itom rl_1ft'i ® City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department _ 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T. (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 GRADING Project No.: SUBTT18122 / DRC2006. Type: 76 lot residential subdivision 00793 Location: East side of East Avenue north of the 2 0 Freeway Planning Department: MICHAEL SMITH APN: 0225-191-03,-04,-13,-15, &-20 Meeting Date: December 15, 2009 revised By: Matthew Addington on May 12, 2011 Acceptable for Planning Commission: Yes:xxx o; A If NO, see COMMENTS below: PRELIMINARY: FINAL: GRC: December 15, 2009 By: Matthew Addington PC Meeting: "Qq By: Note: Building and Safety — Grading will review i nd comment on future submittals for this project. • Note: See Sections B and C for revisions. A. STANDARD CONDITIONS - Standard Building and dafety - Grading and Planning Department standard conditions for Grading and Drai iage Plans. 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordince with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and a d grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial confo mance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will b provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review, Plans shall implement d sign recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading a d Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports .shall be completed, submitted, and approved by t e Building and Safety Official prior to the Issuance of building permits. I:IBUILDINGWERMrrS%SU97T18122%SUWrrl8122 a ORC2006-00793 Orad 20110512.doo p Committee prcje�t Report 20081215 rev • 1 of 6 Itam rl_ 7 QA City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department _ 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check construction projects and for existing buildings is required for all new improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut d fill. The.Gradiing and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site pr or to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. A Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit shall 4 submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review. A separate plan/permit i Plan/Permit shall be submitted to the Building am S. A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 der shall be prepared and submitted to the Building a approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Enl 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to as easements prior to the issuance of a grading pen 10. it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to as acceptance letter(s) from adjacent downstream p natural condition (concentrated flows are not aca Safety Official a drainage study showing the prop flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 11. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ob adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on p showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed c it Precise Grading and Drainage Safety Official for review. gn storm event for o"ile drainage d Safety Official for review and 3suance of a grading permit All of Record. any required off-site drainage any required off-site drainage ty owner(s) or discharge flows in a 1) & shall provide the Building and flows do not exceed the existing written permission from the irty line or provide a detaii(s) t from the property line. 12. All slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset fromtija public right of way or adjacent private property, including lot side yards. 13. Private sewer, water and storm drain improvemei adopted California Plumbing Code. 14. The final grading and drainage plan shall show e feet beyond project boundary. 15. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to i; will be designed per the, current topography a minimum of 100 - id grading bond for all cut and fill lance. of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved b the Building and Safety Official. 1;1BUILDINGP MrrS%SUB1T1812ZSUBTT18122 & =2006.00793 Gfadl 19 Commute Project Repoli, 20091215 rev 2011051240o 2of6 Itam r)_1RS ® City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department 10500 Civic Center or. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T: (909) 477-2710 F: (909) 477-2711 • 16. The precise grading and drainage plan shall folio% Rancho Cucamonga handout 'Information for Gra 17. Grading Inspections: a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owr request a pr&grading meeting. The meeting s owner/representative, the grading contractor a discuss about grading requirements and- previ grading meeting is not held within 24 hours frc operations, the grading permit may be subject Inspector, b. The grading contractor shall call into the City c and Safety Department at least 1 working day following grading inspections prior to continuin 1) The bottom of the over-excavat 2) Completion of Rough Grading, permit; 3) At the completion of Rough G owner shall submit to the Perm Safety Front Counter) an origi Certifications to be prepared t sealed by the Civil Engineer a 4) The rough grading certificates be reviewed by the Associate and approved prior to the issu the format provided in the City of Ing Plans and Permit°. and grading contractor shag II be attended by the project the Building Inspector to ive measures, etc. If a pre - the start of grading suspension by the Building Rancho Cucamonga Building advance to request the grading operations: to issuance of the building ding, the grading contractor or I Technicians (Building and II and a copy of the Pad and properly wet signed and I Soils Engineer of Record; rid the compaction reports will igineer or a designated person ice of a building permit. S. COMMENTS - The following items shall be corrected completed, submitted to, reviewed and approved by staff prior to scheduling the project r a Planning Commission hearing. Copies of required easement/right-of-way documents including legal descriptions, shall be submitted for review prior to obtaining final signature . The review period for the above will generally be a minimum of two weeks or longer depe�Iding upon the adequacy and complexity of the submittal: II 1. Include a WQMP BMP exhibit with the 2. In all section views call out the minimum and 1:13UILDINGWERMITS%SUBTT19122%SUBTT78122 6 ORC2006-00793 20110512.doc grading and drainage plan. mum physical heights of the wall on Itpm r)-1RS, CommNtee ProJed Repoli, 20091215 rev City of Rancho Cucamonga Buitding 3 Safety Department 10800 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 81730 T:(909)477-2710 F:(909)477-2711 both sides of the wall. In reviewing the elevations n the plans it appears that some walls maybe over 10 -feet high and as high as Z1 -feet. 3. An updated Water Quality Management Plan 4. Pad elevations should be adjusted in elevation to the current adopted California Building Code. 5. A discussion was held regarding the connection ( private sewage disposal (septic) systems on ead 200 -feet of the project site on Fast Avenue. Staff on the high side of the project and the nearest se from the east side of the projecL Therefore, cons feasible at this time. As a sewer system may be f sewage disposal systems fail due to time and usi Section C to require the proposed private sewage the front yard to allow for connection to a future F C. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all facilities adjacent to private trails). All slo accomplish this shall be installed prior to final m 2. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be or lined gutters and swales where concentrated lines exceed 10 perceft be submitted for review. for the 2% swale requirement in the project to a public sewer In -(leu of lot due to an existing sewer within etermined that the existing sewer is ,or connection was over 200 -feet away uction of a public sewer system is not callable in the future when the private a condition of approval is made in disposal systems to be constructed in blic sewer system in the street. )ss -lot drainage, (except in approved i and retaining walls necessary to approval. The applicant shall provide hard exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow 3. Prior to removing fences or walls along common Ibt lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 4. All cross lot drainage easements shall be requirements.-_ . 5. The rough grading and precise grading plans 1:1BUILDINGWERMRSt.9UBTT18122NSUSnl8122 8 DRC20OR0793 20110512.doo per City of Rancho Cucamonga include an exhibit showing the Committee Pmjeot Repot, 20091215 rev I+om n— 197 4 of 6 • City of Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department _ 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 T:(909)477.2710 F:(909)477-2711 locations of all water quality management plan 6. All equestrian trails shall be constructed with a swale. 7. In the equestrian trails water bars shall be management practices (BMP's). cross slope draining to a concrete Equestrian Trail Slope Wter Bar I terval S acing 4% to 5.99% 5p -feet 6% to 8.99% 4Q -feet 9% to 11.99% 310 -feet 12% and greater 2 -feet S. Prior to Issuance of a grading permit the applicant disposal (septic) system plan for the entire project • 9. All proposed private sewage disposal (septic) al each lot to allow for future connections to public public street(s). 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and appror the applicant shall provide a waste discharge Ido sheet of the grading and drainage plan. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applica Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreen Management Plan D. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1. Maintenance of BMP's identified in the WQMP 2. The submitted Water Quality Management Plan revision date of October 20, 2008 (the preparer resubmitted for review was deemed substantiall, had the same dates. A spot check of some determined that the document did not appear k the same comments from the previous subm, completed: 1:1BUILDINCa1PERMITSZUB T18122iSUM18122 & DRC2006-00793 20110312.doe submit a master private sewage each lot shall be locate in the front yard of y sewer system located within the of the water quality management plan I ication number (WDID) on the title shall record a copy of the City of it of Storm Water Quality be addressed in the project CC&R's. IVQMP) dated February 5, 2007 with a 3f the document is not identified) was complete. Please note the document of the key issues in the document be revised. The comments below are fai. The following items need to be Itcm rl_ IRA an Committee Projed Report, 20091215 rev Itcm Il_1QQ Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS July 23, 2009 Chaffey Joint Union HS District David Jeffers Consulting, Inc. SFR Subdivision in VHFHSZ 6375 East Ave. East Ave N/O 210 SUBTT18122 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the • maximum distance between fire hydrants and the location of fire hydrants must be in accordance to the 2007 California Fire Code and the RCFPD Ordinance FD46. r� FSC -2 Fire Flow I. The required fire flow for this project will be established in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20 -pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500 -foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire service plans are required for all projects. that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. 4. On all site plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 -feet of the proposed project site. FSC -3 Prerequisite for submittal of Overhead Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems 1. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. item n—ion FSC -4 Requirement for Automatic Fire Sprinkler Systems a. Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance FD46, the 2007 California Fire. Code and the approved Fire Protection Plan require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in selected lots a s listed in the report. FSC -6 Fire District Site Access Fire District access roadways include public roads; streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the approved Fire Protection Plan for specifics on the access requirements. 1. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard #9-1. The following design requirements apply: a. All automatic gates shall be provided with a Fire District approved, compatible traffic pre-emption device. The devices shall be digital. Analog devices are not acceptable. Devices shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturers instructions and specifications. b. Vehicle access gates shall be provided with an approved Fire District Knox Key Switch. c. The key switch shall be located outside and immediately adjacent to the gate for use in the event that the traffic pre-emption device fails to operate. d. A traffic loop device must be installed to allow exiting from the complex. e. The gate shall remain in the open position for not less than 20 -minutes and shall automatically reset. f. Gates on perimeter walls must be solid and non-combustible except the main entrance gates per the Fire protection Plan. . 2. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A site plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for approval. 3. Approved Fire Department Access: Any approved mitigation measures must be clearly noted on the site plan. A copy of the approved Alternative Method application, if applicable, must be reproduced on the architectural plans submitted to B&S for plan review. FSC -7 Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District', and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, E=xhibit V-7 as High Probability -High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. Fire Protection Plans (FPP): The developer shall comply with all the requirements of the approved Fire protection Plan for this subdivision. The FPP was designed and approved in accordance with the County of San Bernardino's Development Code Fire Area FS -3 as amended by RCFPD Ordinance FD46, RCFPD Standard 47-1, and the 2007 CBC Chapter 7A requirements apply to the development of the site, the construction of the buildings .and the landscaping. These development codes provide standards regulating: a. Fire resistive roof assemblies b. Vegetation Management c. Fire District access roadways. d. Ignition resistant construction and protection of openings. 2 item n-191 • e. Fire sprinkler systems f. Fire protection water supply & Fire flow criteria The approved fire protection plans (FPP) and documentation must be recorded with San Bernardino County prior to release of building permits. Proof of the recording must be provided to FCS. NOTE: The architectural drawings submitted to the building department for the construction of the homes shall reference the FPP and shall implement all the requirements of the FPP. The landscape plans when submitted to the planning department for review will be routed to FCS for plan review in compliance with approved FPP. Mobile, stationary or portable power -operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. b. Pre -wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. c. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10 -feet. A "hot -work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump -type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. FSC -8 Chronological summary of VHFHSZ requirements • Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the builder shall have completed that portion of the approved fuel modification/hazard reduction plan determined to be necessary by the Fire District before the introduction of any combustible materials into the project area. Approval is subject to an on-site inspection. Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, All the required ignition resistant features including landscaping of the FPP shall be completed, inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. FSC -13 Alternate Method Application Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents and payment of the review fee. .Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS — Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: 1. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required • 3 Item r)-142 prior to any building permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building i$ Safety Division and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site -fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 2. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CCWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600 -foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CCWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CCWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 3. Fire Protection Plans: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of the VHFHSZ requirements. 4. Construction Access: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. 5. Fire Flow: A current fire flow letter from CCWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CCWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. PRIOR TO THE RELEASE OF TEMPORARY POWER The building construction must be substantially completed in accordance with Fire Construction Services requirements. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire Sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards #9-1 by Fire Construction Services. An annual Fire Code permit is required for the access control 5. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy,,t�e-fiL;:_ .. _.. access roadways must be ih6talled tri accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CCBR's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit Item n-'102 ® parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 6. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. The address signs shall be non combustible and in accordance with RCFPD Standards. 7. Fire Protection Plans: Please refer to RCFPD Summary of the VHFHSZ requirements. ® 5 Itom r1_1GA r City of Rancho Cucamonga i MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project File No.: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 Public Review Period Closes: November 9, 2011 Project Name: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, Variance DRC2009-00020 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2009-00224 Project Applicant: Chaffey Joint Union High School District Project Location (also see attached map): Located in the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Etiwanda Specific Plan,. located at the east side of East Avenue, approximately 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) - APN: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20 Project Description: A proposal to subdivide five (5) vacant parcels with a combined area of approximately 53 acres into 76 lots. • FINDING Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environmenThis is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as the lead agency, has conducted an proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding: t and is The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: .7 (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted, the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytic basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are, available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477-2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed AAitlgted Negative.Declaration during the review period. November 9 2011 Date of Determination • - � . � � �� �-' Adopted By Itcm rl_IQcz • RESOLUTION NO. 14-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743, A REVIEW OF A PROPOSAL FOR 76 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 76 -LOT SUBDIVISION OF ABOUT 53 ACRES WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE, ABOUT 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL FREEWAY (SR -210); AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, AND -20. A. Recitals. . 1. KB Home filed an application for the issuance of Development Review DRC2013-00743, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 23rd day of April 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. • B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on April 23, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to five (5) parcels located on the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210); and b. The project site has an overall area of approximately 2.4 million square feet (53 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 2,500 feet (east to west) by approximately 940 feet (north to south); and C. To the north there are single-family residences, including recently constructed single-family residences within Tract 17651. To the west of the project site, are single-family residences and a single, vacant parcel. To the south, is a vacant parcel owned by Caltrans and used by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District for access to their facilities further to the east. Beyond this parcel is the Foothill Freeway (SR -210). The properties to the east are vacant; and is d. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan; and Itam r)_ I QA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-14 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 — KB HOME April 23, 2014 Page 2 e. The proposal is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of a 76 -lot subdivision (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122) that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on November 9, 2011, for a total of 76 single-family residences; and f. The applicant proposes four (4) distinct footprints — Plans 1, 2, 2x, 3, and 4 — and reverse footprints of each for a total of ten (10) footprints. The number of available footprints will comply with Figure 5-45 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and g. Plans 1, 2, and 2x will be one-story, while the others will be two-story. The mix of one- and two-story homes is consistent with the policy adopted by the Planning Commission requiring that 25 percent (minimum) of the proposed houses must be single -story. The houses on all corner lots (Lots 1, 17, 20 through 23, 28, 29, 40, 41, 52, 53, 64, 65, and 76) will be single -story as required per Section 5.42.608 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and h. The project will comply with Section 5.42.606 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan that requires that 50 percent of the garages to be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes the visual presence of the garage; and i. The proposed houses will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of a 76 -lot subdivision (Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122), that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on November 9, 2011, for a total of 76 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential. b. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on November 9, 2011, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. No substantial changes Itpm n -1W PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-14 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 — KB HOME • April 23, 2014 Page 3 are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; no substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; no new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; and no additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. There have been no substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less -than -significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) Approval is for the development of 76 single-family residences in conjunction with a previously approved 76 -lot subdivision of about 2.4 million square feet (53 acres) within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue, about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR -210) - APNs: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and -20. 2) The development of all lots shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Very Low (VL) Residential District as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3) The molding along the top of the stone or brick veneer wainscots shall also be stone or brick, not foam. 4) The rock veneers on the Craftsman themed elevations shall be varied so that the houses with this theme have either fieldstone, river rock, brick, or stackstone veneer. The ratio of the different types of veneers that are applied shall be equal throughout the subdivision, i.e. no particular veneer that is used shall be the dominant veneer. Adjoining Craftsman -themed houses shall not have the same type of veneer. 5) All garage doors shall have decorative windows that match the theme of the corresponding house. 6) Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, Etiwanda Specific Plan, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. • 7) Model homes shall require the review of a separate Temporary Use Permit (Model Home) and fee prior to the submittal of documents for plan check and construction. Note: Parking in the street will not be permitted for this purpose. A temporary off-street parking area that Itam r) -19R PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-14 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 — KB HOME April 23, 2014 Page 4 complies with all applicable parking requirements will be required and must be shown on the plans for this permit. 8) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122 (including all Mitigation Measures identified in the associated Mitigated Negative Declaration), Variance DR02009-00020, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00483 shall apply. 9) Consistent with Resolution No. 11-56, Noise Mitigation Measure #3, for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18122, ' prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit a noise assessment that analyzes the interior noise levels of the proposed homes and establishes mitigation measures to ensure that the interior noise levels are less than significant. Mitigation measures identified in the noise assessment shall be incorporated into the building construction plans for the houses that are determined to have interior noise levels that exceed City standards. Engineerinq Services Department 1) All pertinent conditions of approval of Planning Commission Resolution No. 11-56 approving Tentative Tract Map 18122 shall apply. Building. and Safety (Grading) Department 1) The applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of the Grading Permit for any underground water quality management plan (WQMP) Best Management Practices (BMPs) devices which is 10 feet or deeper below the surface of the ground after construction. 2) The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross -lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 3) Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent.. 4) Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 5) Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit, the applicant shall provide to Building and Safety Services Director a copy of the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan for review prior to recordation of the document. The Itam n_1QQ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-14 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 — KB HOME • April 23, 2014 Page 5 Memorandum of Agreement for Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 6) In the equestrian trails water bars shall be spaced accordingly: Equestrian Trail Slope Water Bar Interval Spacing 4% to 5.99% 50 feet 6% to 8.99% 40 feet 9% to 11.99% 30 feet 12% and greater 20 feet 7) The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm • Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 0 8) If during construction the depths of the infiltration pits are dug 10 feet or greater below grade, the developer shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. itam n—Inn PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-14 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00743 - KB HOME April 23, 2014 Page 6 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Frances Howdyshell, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed., and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 23rd day of April 2014, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: DRC2013-00743 SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW APPLICANT: KB HOME NORTHEAST CORNER OF EAST AVENUE ABOUT 150 FEET NORTH OF THE FOOTHILL LOCATION: FREEWAY (SR -210) - APN: 0225-191-03,-04,-13,-15, AND -20. ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR OFOMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Date 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 14-14 or Approval Letter, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. B. Time Limits Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. C. Site Development • 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign itam n -7m Project No. DRC2013-00743 Completion Date Itam n_7n:t program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all I /_ Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 3. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 4. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 7. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval -in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, I_I_ including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 9. Provide a 24 -foot by 24 -foot or 12 -foot by 48 -foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 10. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24 -foot by 24 -foot corral with appropriate fencing. 11. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 12. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 13. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 14. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 15. For residential development, return walls and comer side walls shall be decorative masonry. 16. On comer side yards, provide minimum 5 -foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5 -foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition 2 Itam n_7n:t Project No. DRC2013-00743 Completion Date • to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Manager, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 17. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. D. Building Design 1. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building and Safety Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 2. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. • 3. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unittlot and a pull box to connect I_I_ to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber -to -the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. E. Landscaping A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15 -gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5 - gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section • shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. [tarn r1_7nd Project No. DRC2013-00743 Completion Date 4. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 5. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 6. Special landscape features such as mounding, alluvial rock, specimen size trees, meandering sidewalks (with horizontal change), and intensified landscaping, is required along East Avenue. 7. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 8. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 9. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 10. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall be in conformance with the City's Development Code Chapter 17.80. F. Environmental 1. Noise levels shall be monitored after construction to verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. Noise levels shall be monitored by actual noise level readings taken on- and off- site. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to final occupancy release. The final report shall also make recommendations as to additional mitigation measures to reduce noise levels to below City standards, such as, residential exterior noise levels to below 60 dBA and interior noise attenuation to below 45 dBA. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. 3. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. G. Other Agencies 1. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 4 Itpm n -Ins Project No. DRC2013-00743 Completion Date • 2. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S). H. Building and Safety VHFHSZ Tract Standard Conditions NOTE: The construction of this tract must be in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and /or the California Building; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); C. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; • f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (DRC2013-00743) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage tothethe City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. Developers wishing to participate in the Community Energy Efficiency Program (CEEP) can contact the Building and Safety Services Department staff for information and submittal requirements. Site Development 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. All plans shall be marked with the project file number (DRC2013-00743). The applicant shall comply with the . latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. is 2. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the _I_I applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development 5 Itcm r1_7nr% Project No. DRC2013-00743 Completion Date Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 3. The Building and Safety. Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 4. Construction.activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. New Structures Provide compliance with the California Residential/Code Building Code (CBC/CRC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire -resistive construction. 2. Construction of the home must be in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan and/or Chapter 7A of the CBC; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. 3. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 4. The structures in this tract must be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan and The California Residential Code. 5. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. I. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The grading and drainage plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual grading and drainage plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or engineering geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 5. A separate Grading and Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from the Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on - R Itcm n_7n7 Project No. DRC2013-00743 Completion Date • site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. All slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot off -set from the public right-of-way or adjacent private property. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 13. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 14. The precise Grading and Drainage Plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit." 15. Grading Inspections: a. Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss • about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the Grading Permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b. The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Services Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i. The bottom of the over -excavation; ii. Completion of rough grading - The grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Services Department front counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv. The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 16. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 40 Project No. DRC2013-00743 Completion Date J. Water Quality Management Plan 1. The Water Quality Management Plan shall include a copy of the project Conditions of —/—/— Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2800, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: K. Security Lighting 1. The lighting in exterior areas shall be in vandal -resistant fixtures.L. Security Hardware 1. A secondary locking device shall be installed on all sliding glass doors. �- 2. One -inch single cylinder dead bolts shall be installed on all entrance doors. If windows are —/—/— within 40 inches of any locking device, tempered glass or a double cylinder dead bolt shall be used. 3. All garage or rolling doors shall have slide bolts or some type of secondary locking devices. —/—/— M. Windows 1. All sliding glass windows shall have secondary locking devices and should not be able to be —/— lifted from frame or track in any manner. N. Building Numbering 1. Numbers and the backgrounds shall be of contrasting color and shall be reflective for /— nighttime visibility. O. Alarm Systems 1. Alarm companies shall be provided with the 24-hour Sheriffs dispatch number: —/—/— (909) 941-1488. P. Fire Conditions for Single -Family TractsNery High Fire Hazard Severity Zone FSC -1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design .guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the —/—/— spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the fire hydrant design & installation shall be in accordance to RCFPD Policies and Standards. b. If any portion of. a facility or building is located more than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant measured on an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, additional private or public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. C. Provide one fire hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fire flow or fraction thereof. Project No. ORC2013-00743 Completion Date • FSC -2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project will be determined in gallons per minute at a minimum —!_/— residual pressure of 20 -pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix B, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. The Fire flow has been established in the approved FPP 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500 -foot radius of the proposed project may be used to _/_/_ provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Fire service plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building Permits will not be issued until fire service plans are approved. On all Site Plans to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within 600 -feet of the proposed project site. FCS -3 Fire Access Roadway 1. Public and private roads shall be improved as approved by the fire district in the Fire _/_/_ Protection plan before an occupancy release can be granted by the Fire District FSC4 Hazardous Fire Area This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone" (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "Hillside District", and/or within the area identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability -High Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations have been determined to be within the "Hazardous • Fire Area" as defined by the Fire District. The Hazardous Fire Area is based on maps produced by the California Department of Forestry as adopted by the RCFPD. Hazard Reduction Plans: The applicant shall prepare a Fire Protection Plan and obtain approval of the plan by RCFPD. The FPP addresses the following: a. Fire protection water supply b. Fire resistive non-combustible roof assemblies c. Fuel Modification by vegetation management d. Fire District access roadways e. Ignition resistive construction and protection of openings f. Fire sprinkler systems g. Fire flow criteria h. For construction requirements in the "Hazard Fire Area" refer to the current editions of the CBC Chapter 7A, The California Residential Code, the RCFPD Ordinance, and the applicable, standards and policies. 2. The architectural plans for the construction of the buildings must be in accordance with the current editions of the CBC Chapter 7A, The California Residential Code, the RCFPD Ordinance, the applicable standards and policies, the County of San Bernardino's Development Code and the approved Fire Protection Plan. 3. Mobile, stationary or portable power -operated equipment in the Hazardous Fire Area shall not be used without the Fire Safety Division's written approval. Specific fire protection measures that may be required to mitigate the hazard include, but are not limited to: a. A stand-by water tender, equipped with a pump, fire hose and nozzle. 9 Project No. DRC2013-00743 Completion Date b. Pre -wetting of the site to avoid the production of sparks between blades or tracks and rocks. c. Conducting a fire watch for a minimum of one-hour following the cessation of operations each day. d. For welding, cutting or grinding work, clear away all combustible material from the area around such operation for a minimum distance of 10 -feet. A "hot -work" permit must be obtained from Fire Construction Services prior to cutting, welding or grinding work. e. Maintain one serviceable round point shovel with an overall length of not less than forty-six (46) inches and one five (5) gallon backpack water pump -type fire extinguisher fully equipped and ready for use at the immediate area during the operation. FCS -5 Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit the applicant shall record the approved Fire Protection plan with the county's recorded office. FCS -6 Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the property must be inspected and accepted by the Fire District staff. Schedule the inspection with Fire Construction Services at 909-477-2713. FSC -7 Single-family Residential Sales Model homes require approved Fire District vehicle access and water supply from a public or private water main system before construction. FCS -8 Fire Sprinklers: The Current editions of Rancho Cucamonga Fire District Ordinance, the California Residential Code and/or any other applicable standards require an approved automatic fire sprinkler system to be installed in all Buildings with R and U occupancy fire areas. All structures must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers in accordance with NFPA 13D, 13R or 13. FCS -9 Annexation of the parcel map: Annexation of the parcel into the Community Facilities District Irl_ #85-1 or #88-1 is required prior to the issuance of grading or Building Permits. FSC -10 Alternate Method Application: Fire Construction Services staff and the Fire Marshal will review all requests for alternate method, when submitted. The request must be submitted on the Fire District "Application for Alternate Method" form along with supporting documents •and payment of the review fee. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating -- the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Private Fire Hydrants: For the purpose of final acceptance, a licensed sprinkler contractor, in the presence of Fire Construction Services, shall conduct a test of the most hydraulically remote on-site fire hydrants. The underground fire line contractor, developer, and/or owner are responsible for hiring the company to perform the test. A final test report shall be submitted to Fire Construction Services verifying the fire flow available. The fire flow available must meet or exceed the required fire flow in accordance with the California Fire Code. 3. Fire Sprinkler System: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the fire sprinkler system(s) shall be tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services. 4. Fire sprinkler monitoring must be installed tested and final by FCS. 10 Itam n-711 • r �J 11 Item D-212 Project No. DRC2013-00743 Completion Date • 5. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 6. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with noncombustible 4 -inch tall numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100 -feet, additional 4 -inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 7. The Fire Protection Plan: The approved plans shall be recorded with the county recorder's office. 8. Vegetation Management: The landscaping shall be installed and/or modified in accordance with approved FPP and or the RCFPD Standard. --- 9. All requirements of the FPP or the RCFPD Standard must be completed before an occupancy release may be granted. • r �J 11 Item D-212 %a WIL a Fir RANCHO CUCAMONGA SIGN -IN SHEET PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING APRIL 23, 2014 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL S� ckfc Rei 9 cl—t31� ucin Lop, n G 1 n! Pos-t Se 200 Sake -are (,.t/A 2 Update on West -Side Parks and Neighborhood Street Lighting Needs Spring 2014 What is the Issue? • Local parks, greenery, trails and street lighting help maintain the safety and character of o u r neighborhoods, schools, parks, and commercial areas. • Property Owner assessments for parks and street lighting have not changed since 1993. • Unfortunately there are not sufficient funds to continue to maintain these neighborhood improvements at current levels. Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - citvofrc.us/dist o yO N -------------- �I I I v J m m = _ a m 8 � � I LL ■ i ny epueA+!13I A epueMp3 yW� T i ny lalsat♦'JOa � SL-I Ay ]sayooa `V —•- I I• Milli!W ,,AA V/ I � 1 I L Q ny uaneH I y uaneH i■ I T ny esowiaH Ilk AV eso )GH I ny DIeQ�Uo�V I n PleQ!Uolb' I AV uew aH ; ~QH uewpaH LN Ay Ple%aulA IS ue,[aweo, L` AV qAojo t m v m = t c o m m o o 9 K O m S LL Why Assessment Districts? • RC is a post -Prop 13 city City gets about 5 cents of the property tax dollar, instead of 12-14 cents in older cities • Parks, landscaping, and street lighting districts were formed to pay for these improvements as the City was developed • Districts should each balance their own funding and expenses Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - cityofrc.us/districts Impacts to Local Parks • Additional funding is needed to ensure Children and families enjoy that park bathrooms are clean, local neighborhood parks. playgrounds are safe, park lighting is maintained, and other park facilities can continue to be enjoyed for years to come. 'Rancho C —,mmnnna West -Side Distpdate - cityofrc.us/districts Maintaining Community Trails • Our miles of trails are used for recreation away from speeding cars. • Whether used as equestrian trails or to provide children with safe paths to school, trails need to be maintained for safety. Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - 4_ - Street Lighting and Safety Needs • Street lighting assists in keeping the City's neighborhood streets safe. • Street lights allow police officers and firefighters to readily locate a resident's home in an emergency. • Additional funds are needed to: continue to: • Repair/replace damaged street lights • Maintain lighting to ensure safe, walkable neighborhoods and deter crime. Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - cityofrc.us/districts Are there local business needs? • Maintaining the safety and character of local neighborhoods and commercial districts is critical to supporting and retaining local businesses. • Businesses need to maintain a welcoming, safe environment for customers and employees, with: • Well-maintained street lighting • Removing trash from medians • Upkeep of commercial corridor landscaping Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - cityofrc.us/districts ISK What can be done? •Weare seeking to: •Simplify and streamline our neighborhood-based parks and lighting districts •Provide greater equity and transparency Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - cityofrc.us/districts Equity and Transparency for Property Owners • 8 new neighborhood- E a E 9 i t =m 5 E ti L--.--------- _- _- ------------- a -------- based Parks a n d Street-- � I 1 I Lighting Districts are Hdls.de RdHERITAGE PARK -ZONE being proposed to replace existing districts Banyan SA.` � i BERYL PARK ZONE • Thisp rocess ensures that lothRM si�l` �— HEO AND each property owner. CHURCH PARK ZONE • Pays a fa i r rate Base Line RdI �I LIONS AND • Understands the services REDHILL PARK ZONE i they are receiving for their FODthill BI! assessment dollars BEAR Arrow Rt GULCH PARK - — —ZONE OLD TOWN • Allows owners to support 81h StAND a GOLDEN the neighborhood parks OAK SOUTH RANCHO ' 6th s �1 PARK --'BUS INESS ZONE and street lights that theirZONE , 41h SIQ 12Q homes and businesses _ - directly benefit from Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - cityofrc.us/districts Base line Rd Foothill BI i Arrow Rt I GENTRY BUSINESS i ZONE r --------Q i I I W i a Fiscal Accountability and Oversight • All revenues must be deposited into a separate fund. • By law, funds can only be spent to maintain or improve the local area's parks, trails, greenery, and street lighting. • Annual independent audits will be published for public review. • A Citizens' Oversight Committee will monitor expenditures and ensure all funds are spent properly. Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - cityofrc.us/districts How would additional funds maintain local parks and street lighting? • Removing graffiti from park buildings, and along trails • Maintaining parks, sports fields, playground equipment • Cleaning park restrooms • Fixing broken sprinklers in parks • Cleaning up trash • Repairing and replacing burnt-out street lights • Keeping street lights on • Maintaining landscaping along thoroughfares Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - cityofrc.us/districts January 2014 Community Survey -Key Findings ► 71% think things in Rancho Cucamonga are going in the right direction ► 85% think parks, trails, and recreation facilities are adequately maintained ► 56% are not aware that they pay an assessment for the maintenance of parks and street lights ► 32% initially support an assessment increase; with more information, the number increases to 46% Next Steps • Preserve core parks, street lighting, and landscaping services, while implementing budget -balancing measures • Continue use of Gas Tax in SLD 2 • Continue engaging community in discussions about maintaining services and addressing funding needs Core services preserved at this time in a11 10 parks — Restrooms, play equipment, general use park areas, park shelters, parking lots, walking paths, trails Budget change highlights: • Year round bi-weekly mowing for all general use areas • Partnership with sports and equestrian groups • Reduce maintenance and operation accounts • Reduce maintenance in landscaped areas • Eliminate vacant positions • Fully contract out maintenance of 3 additional parks • Perform water audit; turn off water to naturalize selected turf areas • Drain and fence lake temporarily while developing more cost-effective maintenance options Budget -balancing measures will work for near term, but over time expenses will start to outpace revenues again. Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - cityofrc.us/districts Red Hill Lake Facts • Lake is not being permanently closed - this is a false rumor. • Lake will be drained and fenced temporarily to design a more cost-effective and sustainable lake for the future • Current equipment is from 1985; new design can be more water and energy-efficient • Wildlife will be relocated appropriately Rancho Cucam EM I Stay informed about your West -side parks and street lighting districts... • Participate at www.rccommunityideas.com • Text the word DISTRICTS to 22828 from your mobile phone to sign up to receive email update • Go to www.cityofrc.us/districts to sign up for email updates and see more information Questions? Call Dean Rodia, Parks &Landscape Maintenance Superintendent at (909) 477-2730. Rancho Cucamonga West -Side Districts Spring 2014 Update - cityofrc.us/districts Spring 2014 Update - city(�r- ?...'.Ir. t d � - `. ♦ww ��rwwrw - %CSE' c oa, �' L,PY R�v�H° Development Review U(:AMONGA � "'�'�°"�`" DRC2013-00743 A review of 76 single-family homes on a property of about 53 acres in the Very Low Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the east side of East Avenue about 150 feet north of the Foothill Freeway (SR - 210); APNs: 0225-191-03, -04, -13, -15, and - 20. 14GM V k6 I4qI woo Ip 73 #SingleLlFamilyl Jv, Residential Subdivision -4WO _ :.7 ,p; A JN � NI, - ffilf "CK f Sin' Cassia Street Residential Single -Family Residential Subdivision (Tract 17651) Foothill Freeway (SR -210) V--' If. I OR ;.;.-7 i" tSingle-Family A Residential Subdivision -0 b "-" 0'f -71 A ,jo k 6N, LU 1� 7 7.WI. V gt ,gle-Family, =ln Residential :�* Chickasaw Road tow Single -Family Residential Subdivision (Tract 17651) Foothill Freeway (SR -210) V--' If. I OR ;.;.-7 i" tSingle-Family A Residential Subdivision -0 b "-" 0'f -71 A ,jo k 6N, LU 1� 7 7.WI. V gt Ar WOW 9 h' Y L 1 •� S Y' IK _ x '�- ,gyp �� '�"' • "?r� i— r• a ���iiS �i~ *r i � •T'..J .I�.j r .. r r, . •!' s OL •� Fury, + j: .. �. �y �`►' tf.�af .-F�1 A9 -= ars • �:Sr--L ., rM�►` � �`} fie. � � =., s �'E &7F - 7". 1p G r r tre s r 117 0 4. # � j �Y _ +i .. `f •' � rA"' � ... a Ale ' a � -r ' •� !. . r6 .� '� %� 4R � eys �1 ���i�°y� �<idl� �izS.'r`1f. �� .'�, [yF���LjJj�l ., a � R!t' � �'� -. _ 1'� � �, i,•�a � 9 g' •j, .. y �r _ . ,. - , .. • . (S lis t .. } .I�I re' i F f lF /"~• ,� a•'� e. t--:i.'y'' rr '7 i r4t- a ego e e �� � i•°T � �j,! 7yr: .'""`Yk i' r�'.. J_E. �.if � '' ,P � -- _ .S. r � � = a 1.. r .,, k �'� Fk� � i�°"t� -. �d t1 !- i as e a P � t • a r'� ,.�' � �,r�+�� s ys��;� � r j . " T 6fa' a • r' r+i` v~•iy'�t `y! R i, •rS �. 1�NF'r .:di y f�'`!„ ,^ 6 ` �'r6r"�� � j d r it>'- a i d. r .. aR r�}+v � ?,•r s v�fs�3! "��• '.�', .`g, ��f � ` o it u ` y- r 'sY� 4 :JY,�R� Jpu.t+�''ry di p � �« �r � - yq1, �r�'��l,' N r .:7u�c�-F Y�r cif-{ '.._• w 7y a,`�ySt,�'€FF{!�Airr�. CAt .0 3 h - fl n 4 IVery Low Residential 1 (1 - 2 du/ac) J Chickasaw Road i i Cassia Street ZONING Very Low Residential 4 (1 - 2 du/ac) _ y° k ata f Project Open Site Space Very Low Residential (1 - 2 du/ac) Foothill Freeway (SR -210) Low -Residential 1� (2 - 4 du/ac) i 1 ] Y GENERAL PLAN Very Low Residential Cassia Street Very Low Residential Project Open Site I Space Chickasaw Road I Very Low Residential Foothill Freeway (SR -210) Low Residential "' W IL SI TE PLAN for TRACT 18122 IUTINJA j�LI� w,wr wA.r R 11Arr) w.r• wA•� n,.e w.wi w,weora ww.�aera k 6 R R it H.IMI KM 11NIMSn"Wff0$V"Af HAM1 HANSMT 9ntAK,NIDIOYEWAY PLANS CAWA HAMS CA71fA MifN STRANMIf0101'FWA11 /tm.1 "It HAM I IMfl117UXW 0M"AY sn HAM kv PREPARED W PREPARED FOR; OARABE A1EAfrEMT! sutarKsxry�cxs OP[Mv1 WAAEA MAYERS & ASSOCIATESe KB HOME a e r r r r Ru.trvnev .«...:r.. :..r..+w,,,o.... •.o CIVIL ENGINEERING, Inc. 0V 1 363f0"VALIEYDRNE ft r.Anaraai — -- • W¢DOMA2G 92595 1nrrRr a i7s au.u.wA.cowo rorr•A.0•RO..RwrEIIAAY •.t HA.vMrtq•ES+OIPcl2(tL40.6URrE LW ML - M51) 691,V41 M ewr� N••r Ow• •!�M W I��GOM 1R Or/eMAn••MIeleMlr •w•ARe.RRA� F W. SITE PLAN for TRACT 18 122 ay woo. www w I to TI N rw cr7y, NNFIINl[]A SEE SHEET 2 ,� , I. 1,. I I I� • I I .wr s 1 r j �•JR 11 u I, 1 /� -. i ` � i— _ ..�. � - - GfbNBYi�RT-� - _ _ -y-1- = T•\ y � - �I •I- R I 1 r I r 1 r 11 I , „ r ` I s.- %' I .$ ` \lit Ar '1,f� 1111,j'}��;'\{,� 11 _'�, f \ -I I -- I I _ ` 1 I -_ 1 1 + � I I- II I • 1 F,f''. �• it 4 � I I � 1 � � � I II la I / I I- I 1 �{ I ,%I-- II jft cn 1-I ' 3��_ � ; _ I I 1. . - � � • - - � L' t r� ~� ` 1 i �! litII I � I - 1 I II I � • oo I I � � � � � •; JI ' ' � I II II I. 1 iI -s - - - _ - •' II UrI i r'' r� I I \y+� I I II r• I I , � _ I � I I �� co I. I I 1 � , 1_ -"' r at si YS at1 • I I! I �ij' 'f� � sib • � .I � II I` ,J f -- � I 1 I I iII'' A�`1 'I V 11j �' • - I �� _ — �l� I- i -- �.r. it . II L %I I I I I 1 I 1 ( M 1 lit i 1 �� I •��I ' b �. i , ' I � II JI I 1 \ 1 I s ♦ I - I I �I 1' 1 I { T- l i I I. - - - --- \ P71--- ----- L -r�-- -r— , ---- � �� Y` ��--\'= j •<e Z� I��� ,•-p''>�9pw \/,✓ F� ��.%�'�r' � , �r IL�_ � -ti•x� �� l ��- I,- JPa 1 . I � (`\ f�`"—+, 1 i I � � .i � a i. /\ �-•—' 111 � } t � it C C _S'1 � �. � l� .'�'# a� ., \\ �,•.•_ „\P1I I Ji f,l. - ,�_ I/ i l rii \ � _51 1 1 1-1 I �i V / l.� 1 ...S�Z1� !i_� Q Q' RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0 CALIFORMA Project Description This proposal is in conjunction with a previously approved subdivision of the property, Tentative Tract Map 18122, that was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission on November 9, 2011. RANCHO UC'.AMONGA ALIFORtNIA (continued • 12* floor plans and 4 architectural themes that range in floor area between 3,381 square feet for Plan 1 to 4,506 square feet for Plan 4; • 38 of the houses will be one-story — this is consistent with Planning Commission policy requiring that 25 percent of a subdivision be comprised of single -story houses; • The houses on all corner lots will be single -story as required per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. RA-NCHO UC'AMONGA 7AL1FORN1A (continued) • The project will comply with the Etiwanda Specific Plan which requires that 50 percent of the garages to be oriented or situated in a manner that minimizes its visual presence; • The architecture of each home will have architectural treatment on all elevations referred to as 360 -degree architecture); matching (commonly • Each house will have a prominent, well-defined front entrance and a covered porch area. Project Description RANCHO (continued) UCANI 0NGA ,r'AL1FORNLA • Decorative veneers, such as stone or brick, and/or wood siding will be present on all elevations; • The architectural theme that is primarily represented by the front elevation of each house will be continued on the other elevations through the use of matching colors, materials, and finishes; • All elevations of each house will have articulation of the building plane and vertical variation of the roofline. Y/ IMA" aur Mcg. .T. <•.�7 r MA w.r <w�ws.wr s r n. i. I i I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 i 1 1 •�li r; • 1 I IF- :.� KITCHEN I 1 1 1 OATH- 1 1 � - I 1 I 1 ----•ri r � 1 I 1 11 1 1 .wr I t =TM BEDROOM I Tlt4� GARARGE BEDROOM In GREAT ROOM FLEX DEN/ OPT BEDROOM 3381 SF • SL l l PIAN I �" RANCHO CI AFFEY 11 1 11 `�iOiY First Floor Plan'A' TO ORDER CR Dear r.rraln Cmf OF RANCHO CUCANONGA ORC2013-0O743 MET ZD MI, Alta.. I I ............... oMAZE ■EMO WOMM moll 0 0 0 m 3e�C z �Q (� 3 o e n 0 z n R' Cr1 x o a C d o 'C w ts. m2pff N$g PAN 00 MEMO I 1 ■MOM MEMO MEMO _N loll Ai ----- ----- MM 1 ' ' SAWS \ BEDROOM 3 ` ' aMep BEDROOM 1 iC -'y BEDROOM , ' II mJ PAWVRY 11 11 11 KITCHEN I' i Ii "i PANTRY ii FLEX COURTYARD .. ROOM 11 II r ----------------- now I + II /1 1 I II 11 1 1 1 II 11 I 1 II 11 1 1 Pop" 1 II II 1 1 1 I ----------------- 3620S GARAGE RAW �`" 0 11O' MASTER LAUNM BEDROOM ei+�•P e : Po. YwtPi M Y... �..uarw• rw, l,! r7 r R First Floor Plan W PLAN 2 ..- t r 1► ,: `oma,.`.""" RAMC} IO CEiAFFEYNLSW am` ` ra-URI TO ORDER ""' r.r.xan CrtY OF RANCHO CMAHOWjA DRC20 OOrq SIEEi tM a Q E i r 0 0- 0 —0 A m A' � f tgaga ci o si 2 t n °z n a N q B $ey ,F pA ii R 0 Ci hi H 14P E-A I !______________1 I ----------------------- 1 I I , 1 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' I ' S A FI PI 'A' 076 SF DEN ROOM ol ii�� N[1u�1� �Llg ■ 3 -CAR GARAGE NOOK " DINING i ROOM I 11 11 11 LIVIN ROOM I 1 11 I I I 1 I 1 I /OIICN 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 F;1 rst Flay Pl—'A' PL ccon onr an r RANCI10 CHAFFEY . Cm OF RANCNOCUCA\IONGA � army, .^" 0,ml ORC1013-OD?43 4.•.x.9 TO ORDER SHEETSS A 9 imam ■ A r� m� MM ■ owl ii imam ■ A r� m� MM ■ owl sp�M a 13 r Left Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) Right Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) Front F.levation'C' (Farmhouse) z T� A' a I i Rear Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) PLAN 3 RANCIIO CHAFFEY ® TO ORDER1 n. ry neq.esa.mu CfIY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA DRC2013-O743 SHEET85 F ®® + J, Right Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) Front F.levation'C' (Farmhouse) z T� A' a I i Rear Elevation 'C' (Farmhouse) PLAN 3 RANCIIO CHAFFEY ® TO ORDER1 n. ry neq.esa.mu CfIY OF RANCHO CIICAMONGA DRC2013-O743 SHEET85 RANCHO CHAFFEY TO ORDER "�°"'""'�•"' MY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ORCIO764D)4 $WET 106 p; r, 0 0 0 0 .n �r _j O� 'Mrsp 0 0 0 .n r ;A i _j r ;A RANCHO U(AMONGA CALIFORNIA Review Timeline • Initial Submittal —August 28, 2013 • Completeness Determination — November 12, 2013 • Design Review Committee — January 28, 2014 • Neighborhood Meeting — January 29, 2014 • Design Review Committee — March 4, 2014 . planning Commission —April 23, 2014 R-A-NCHO UCAMONGA �F',AL1FORN1A (continued) • No substantial changes are proposed or circumstances under which the to the project project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; • Staff finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous "v, igated Negative Declaration. RANCHO UC'.AMONGA CALIFORNIA • This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper; • The property was posted; and • Notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site; • No correspondence or comments have been received except for requests for basic information. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFOI2NLa Conclusion Staff Recommends Approval of: Development Review DRC2013-00743 by adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. R A-NCHO U(AMONGA r-'`AL1FO NIA Gv 04A-stla1O ! `� z// j` leeco�� c4e Pre -Application Review DRC2014-00136 A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual site plan for a facility that provides independent, assisted living, and memory care housing on the undeveloped portion of a property of 9.5 acres that is partially developed with a church within the Low Residential District located at 9944 Highland Avenue - APN: 0201-055-49. 'f- -" dL Iqs k •,:"" dingle amily Residential =- -� Highland Avenue Community Church r �. -> "' • �,= � -� �°�:.- �,� Al des ' S: 4 ) -- , T OF Iti SingleFamily�! Residential Residential _ 'ir -•�t> ' , _ � Wit. ,,1 � � -_ � � �,� � �., - ---- • rx. . - _.� ��.Highland ol Foothiii Freeway 45. "104 h-{:�s .. KINGSTTO_lN. Rio IV � !F a ,♦y'�+ CYPRESS ,sem -"r �b' .. -�Q.. :an.x�: _�•. !6 QIC... � jot I EMON - b.r•! • - - - 4t, '��•• - -w.s�s ^ o "p - - q . t'� ^•c "'t< a� Mz o.. ®Fw.•'+1l�:. � ' x, �.•. ;. w 3, aNGF a y' ' : f.. _ _ «4 a ORANGE � a "-` u ORANOE V OR .• . -aFG: -�' � �. • �� . i.r > iY __T a -"'., �� � � � is �,� xe _,. ��• --.� fes' It - t �, ,► BRISTOL - - V14 ESPERANZA "_. _ 7i�' yt G_: ! BRISTOL 55YY +•,�,,r•�t .j o, --••^a ..•..�..;:��' + 3M `4 _. - Z { r ��-�•+re...tt:. �•r _ .,. .f rff tp Ee ti ;rb-�'1 voJ �t : • Aot :� LDaRG - - Projects on t!-117 ! :..fir rgt1 w o� •p �� Site _ •.o- sem, - i — _ _- _ -' ELL— w s. Yr r, _'-•. A = R SF`9,.. .e 9y� J Qy�; -^yi'{ ..meq wrs'P- dYi U _ T `BALATDN .• '+R`i'�R-a.,,4*'' f.—.� - -__ '.+' c x„) �.y^. iwwk AAAAl At�e`a E.. ;eg.�`S w� t Y d..__. s______. _._._ _ _ _. HIGHLAND A iBLACK OAK - r _e ---'jR ti— !!s / 6 4 iL ^^+ isJADEITE L r r ARCHIBALD ic NODrYD Il 1ic ic-- LONDON r ALEATICOic 3 6 CALLS HERMOSO !I -"i MALVERN r DAYLILY T Cl) r _0 M n rf ,-- PHILLIPS - - - - y m � n r _ CAMBRIDGE r 1 r ELMHURST r HERMOSA (- -"i MALVERN r ru W GENERAL PLAN KINGSTON LR LR LR LR a LR LRLR CYPRESS LR 4 0 LEMON LMR LMR LRZ z LMR LMR W FC/UC U LRVIA ESPERANZA o LR LR LR LR. > a ORANGE a y � a > m a LR LR% BRISTOL LR LR LR Project -" Site $ H � T �QQ � ICLR LR, L _ - �L LR LR 2 LI LRORANGE Y v 0 Y LR LR BRISTOL L FINCH LR U Q m LMR SHINON o LMR Q w m w H! 2 H f u RANCHO Residential Care Facility 9ALIFORNIA CAMO NGA (Development Code definition) Residential Care Facility: Consistent with the definitions of state law, a residential care facility provides 24-hour nonmedical care for more than six persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes, but is not limited to, rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of Medical Services, Extended Care. mD D > D 0T z; m;u �� r X:3 O �, (C) CC n D O (D (D p < rD r 0 3 3 =. cn 3 cn �. cn � � (D u) d _ _ v m y c c m cD ( (DD (D � Q D 7, 0 7, c r+ o v ;u 0 �� _ � o 0 C (Dal n O O �r N rp (D y 3 V' ra n v z v z z n Z VL C� Z -u Z 7 1 Z I n Z 1 0 1-0 Izl�-T ITI -0 1-u I n 101 v IZI I nn n I m z �-0 1 m n tz z 1 -, H C) I m z �-0 1 m n In z I z H C) v z v v z n z z T MU z z z z z z z z z z Op z z z z z z z z z z NC z z Z z z z z z z z GC z z z z z z z z z z CC z z z z z z z z z z SC z z z z z z z z z z RRC Z z z z z z z z z z CO z z z z z z z z z z IP z z z z z z z z z z GI z z z z z z z z z z MIM1 z z z z z z z z z z HI z z T z z z z z z z OS n v z v z m z z _0 z HR z z z z z z z FC z z T z z z z z z z UC D co r m 3 V W O O W a 3 0o ( D r M N r O) z.9 Z C O � v� r 0� I V W O �v 0 0 0 c 0 a 3 0 m n v m 0 3 m n 0 a 0 I'll .*low i -' F � C �. i i �N��1 ���_� � t® � -1 r. i '��r� F � C �. SRM: A Different Kind of Development Company SRM is a privately owned acquisition, development and construction company, specializing in multi -family, senior housing and mixed-use developments across the western United States. Founded by an entrepreneurial team who share a passion for projects that deliver exceptional value for both residents and investors, the company has successfully blended a nimble approach with the ability to deliver on complex projects. We've been told that we're different from our peers. That we pay more attention to quality, to design and to relationships. It's because we know that development isn't just about buildings, it's about people. We believe that real and lasting value is found at the intersect of intentional design, personal commitment and a long-term investment perspective. Banner Bank / Spokane Our Approach InLU11L1U11U1 LJUOI�Jll At SRM, we believe each project is as unique as the neighborhood it joins and the people who will live there. We work closely with communities to design buildings that capture the character of the surroundings and enhance the neighborhood. �L- We choose to build in locations where we like to visit, and we build projects where we'd like to live. We carefully select materials and incorporate distinctive finishing touches and amenities because we believe every development should enhance both the lives of its residents and the neighborhood where it's built. Pte""'"<- 'At SRM, they have a high degree of investment and personal interest in each project and a reputation for quality work.. A lot of developers are not as involved. That is unique. — Craig Crowley, PRINCIPAL, DCI -ENGINEERS The Lyric/ Seattle J AL Our Pledge: Personal Commitment We believe how you do business is just as important as what you build. Our partners and investors trust us because we stand behind our word and our work. Our experience has taught us that the best results are achieved by being hands-on at every step of the project, which is why SRM serves as its own general contractor. In our view, the best outcomes are fueled by talented people coming together and working toward a shared vision. From architects to subcontractors to lenders, we choose to work with partners who share our business philosophy, our passion for quality and our personal investment in each and every project. Homewood Suites /Palo Alto ♦ Corydon Apartments/ Seattle ► \� Our Perspective: A Long Term View Long-term thinking is critical to our success. In every decision we make, we consider the longevity and sustainability of our developments. We choose enduring designs and durable materials. We believe in creating buildings that will stand the test of time. Creating lasting value comes from thinking beyond a particular project. It comes from improving the neighborhood and creating a superior experience for residents. It comes from doing business with subcontractors and suppliers like you intend to do business with them for 20 years. In short, it comes from putting people first. "SRM has a commitment to the Kirkland community. NotJust for today and a particular project — but a long range commitment that combines SRM's development expertise with an understanding of the communitys values IFIF — Ellen Miller Wolfe, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, CITY OF KIRKLAND Kirkand 101 /Kirkland Contact Main Office 111 N. Post, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99201 509.455.5477 Branch Office 520 6th Street South Kirkland, WA 98033 425.629.4437 srmdevelopment.com SEM%M DEVELOPMENT. L L C Our Team We choose team members who are passionate, talented, driven, reliable, and focused. And then we let them get to work. Our team is empowered to solve problems and make decisions in real time. Every team member carries a personal commitment to each of our investors and partners. At SRM, we have a culture of integrity. Ix _�— —I,� rrr ... nr nt ttt r +. u SSf dll i11 �i i Ix Our Results At SRM, our focus is on the long-term ownership of real estate. Since 2001, we have developed and constructed over $1 billion of residential and commercial real estate, including over 3,000 units of senior and multifamily housing and over 650,000 square feet of retail and office space. We have delivered excellent returns for investors, consistently outperforming most of the U.S. Benchmark indexes including the S&P 500, Russell 2000, and NAREIT Index. We provide accredited investors a unique opportunity to invest directly in institutional quality real estate, generate strong cash flow, and benefit from long-term capital appreciation. ';4s an accredited investor 1 take extra care to only invest in projects sponsored byprincibals with integrity, passion, and a strong track record of delivering results. SRM has all three." — Mark Alfieri, SRM INVESTOR SINCE 1997 Merrill Gardens at Queen Anne / Seattle Our Projects, Cont'd 4 /MERRILL GARDENS AT THE UNIVERSITY AND THE CORYDON APARTMENTS /Seattle, WA Located within a short distance of Seattle's University Village shopping center and the University of Washington campus, this intergenerational project has 103 apartment units and 125 assisted living units, as well as 24,000 square feet of retail space on the ground floor. The project was a finalist for the Urban Land Institute's most prestigious award, the Award for Excellence, and received the Citation of Merit Award from Design and Environments for Aging. t /MARKET STREET VILLAGE /San Diego, CA This mixed-use development broughtthe second grocery store to downtown San Diego and helped spur the revitalization of the East Village neighborhood. The project consists of 229 apartment units and a 43,000 -square -foot Albertson's on the ground floor. .f /MERRILL GARDENS AT BANKERS HILL /San Diego, CA No. Located minutes from downtown San Diego and within walking distance of Balboa Park, this 84 -unit independent and assisted living project offers sweeping views of downtown 1 �1 San Diego and Mission Bay. The project 14 FA` received an Award of Merit from the Pacific Coast Builders Conference for Best Senior Housing Community. i Our Projects /GOOGLE CAMPUS /Kirkland, WA lo - Built Built on seven acres of land, the campus consists of 194,000 square feet of office space and contains not only Google's tech workspace, but two restaurants, a doctor's office, massage clinic, fitness center, game rooms, and a climbing wall. At completion, Building C's tenant improvements were one of only eight certified LEED Platinum buildings in the State of Washington. In addition, both Buildings A and B were LEED Gold and the Core and Shell were LEED Silver. /THE LYRIC /Seattle, WA lo - This This apartment complex offers exceptional views of the Puget Sound and downtown Seattle. The 234 -unit project has high quality finishes and amenities, including a fitness room, theater, courtyard, a scenic Sky Lounge, and even a dog run on the roof. Its central Capitol Hill location allows the residents to enjoy the district's diverse restaurants and entertainment. The Lyric received the Pacific Coast Builders Conference Gold Nugget Award for Best "On the Boards" multi -family project. "Based on SRM's willingness to work cooperatively with the City on. refinements to its building, it s evident that SRM builds quality developments and takes pride in what it builds. — Niroop Srivasta, PLANNING& BUILDING MANAGER CITY OF LAFAYETTE