Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2014-10-08-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC
O THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF WNCHO CucAmoNc& THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 8, 2014 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California FIF I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance ORoll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca Munoz_ Howdyshell_ Fletcher_ II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to rive minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION O COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 8, 2014 Page 2 A. Approval of minutes dated September 24, 2014 B. SUMMARY VACATION OF A PORTION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, NORTH OF 6T" STREET(V-226)—A request to find the summary vacation of 9,337 square feet of existing City right-of-way on the east side of Charles Smith Avenue, north of 6t' Street in conformance with the General Plan —APN: 229-271-33 and 229-284-01. Related Files: DRC2006-01012 and DRC2013-00541. IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION., COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and(orposted as public hearings as required bylaw. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. C. HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00769-JASON AND JULIE LEONARD- A request to designate the Jamison House as a historic landmark within the Low Residential (L)District located at 8204 Archibald Avenue;APN:020837714. The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. Related Files: Mills Act DRC2014-00770. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. D. MILLS ACT DRC2014-00770-JASON AND JULIE LEONARD-A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Jamison House, a potential historic landmark located at 8204 Archibald Avenue;APN:020837714. The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. Related Files: Landmark Designation DRC2014-00769. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project. Please sign in after speaking. E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928-ALEX MUSTAPHA-A request to create a Tract Map for an 8-unit townhouse development for a 1.02 acre site within the Medium Residential District located at 7490 Carnelian Street-APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332(In-Fill Development Projects)of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent i HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA OCTOBER 8, 2014 Page 3 with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related Files: Design Review DRC2013-00824 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824 - ALEX MUSTAPHA-Design review for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acres within the Medium Residential District located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18928 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. G. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00825-ALEX MUSTAPHA-A request to remove 9 trees related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 and Design Review DRC2013-00824 for a 1.02 acre site within the Medium Residential District located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill • Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related Files: Tentative Tract SUBTT18928 and Design Review DRC2013-00824. VI. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION H. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS VII. ADJOURNMENT FF� 1,Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 2, 2014,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. r HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA C c� OCTOBER 8, 2014 Page 4 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us THIS HIGHLIGHTED SECTION MAY BE REMOVED WHEN PREPARING THE ACTION AGENDA AND MINUTES. VicinityMap Historic• Preservationand Planning Commission Meeting October 8 20 '14 L.J1 •—•' Li _ C j V = C i z �e I 6 o , o 19th St e Base Line Base Line Ar Church Church Foothill = Foothill N Arnow E •• `� I Arrow J4 mey r r 8th 0 o I W 1 stnW C 6th w V rE, F, G 4th i a = _ 4th * Meeting Location: C, FB] City HallfCouncil Chamber On A: A 10.500 Civic Center Drive Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated September 24, 2014 PP g Item B: Summary Vacation V-226 Item C,D: Historic Landmark Designation DRC2014-00769 & Mills Act Item E, F, G: SUBTT18928; DR DRC2013-00824; TRP DRC2013-00825 S • THF, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE MINUTES OF INCHO 7CAM..ONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AN THE PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 249 2014 0 7000 EM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center ®rive Rancho Cucamonga, California ��•`'''�j�.,.;". - 2a ®c� ' •rz _`.ter Pledge°of(Allegiance 7:00 PM Roll Call Chairman Wimberly X Vice Chairman Oaxaca X Munoz X Howdyshell X Fletcher X Additional Staff Present: Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development, Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney, Tom Grahn, Associate Planner, Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary, Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, Dominic Perez, Assistant Planner ;,�.<.•:'�.,,dr'?„r-.rw.: u.�.�.".'i-�.. ==.�'.i3,'..:�5'.I�`u;:....::.h.:v:'°^�;'r".'�•.t.„�3,.","',.�.��w''.'.r�'..s.:,.1•::.�,.S.cu. r �,',�.b�'y�F�`_'�c�:_' W:'`k�. �. •'�t;4 <.-n.x-:^:.S,:r5y:6y:�'•.°;.�':3�ds�.'�;jr+�i:'.S'.r:,¢^A`.x[rr,i•p:r"a=�;.i....3-~�_..i:'����.:..1 '= At their meeting of August 27, 2014, the Commission selected Commissioner Wimberly to serve as Chairman and Commissioner Oaxaca to serve as Vice Chairman. They will serve for a one year term on both the Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning Commission which is reviewed annually per the Planning Commission Administrative Guidelines. Please welcome Chairman Wimberly and Vice Chairman Oaxaca to their new positions on the Commission and thank Commissioners Howdyshell and Fletcher for their prior leadership and service in this capacity. • Chairman Wimberly announced that the workshop scheduled for this evening is canceled at the request of the applicant. Commissioner Munoz welcomed back Commissioner Fletcher. Item A-1 a HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 2 Commissioner Fletcher thanked staff, the City Council and the Fire Department for the cards and flowers. K. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. 3. A. Approval of Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes dated August 13, 2014 B. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes dated August 27, 2014 C. Approval of Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes dated August 27, 2014 A. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 4-0-1 (Howdyshell abstain)to adopt the minutes as presented for August 13, 2014. B. And C. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher, carried 5-0 to adopt the minutes as presented for August 27, 2014.. ?�jt'. "�4ry ',..; p. ~' is c'°z :� .`f`•''' I t �'' n � i NJ The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual for each project Please sign in after speaking. D. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19550 — RANCHO HAVEN, LP — A request to subdivide a parcel of about 87,120 square feet(2.0 acres), that is currently developed with two (2) commercial buildings, into two (2) parcels of 54,014 square feet (1.24 acres) and Item A-2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION cp&= MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 3 33,106 square feet (0.76 acres) in the Industrial Park (IP) District and Haven Avenue Overlay District(HADD), located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street. Related files: Conditional Use Permit CUP 99-53, Conditional Use Permit DRC2012-01193, and Minor Development Review DRC2010-00400. This action is categorically exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15315—Minor Land Divisions;APN:0209-262-20. CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 27, 2014. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED A CONTINUANCE TO AN UNSPECIFIED DATE. Chairman Wimberly noted the item was carried over from the August 27, 2014 meeting date. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Howdyshell to continue the item to an unspecified date at the applicant's request. Carried 5-0. ® E. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19450 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION -A request to subdivide a 13.23-acre parcel to create 3 new parcels within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250.Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. F. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00565 — SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION - A request to develop a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street- APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014-00250. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. G. UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2014-00250-SCHEU MANAGEMENT CORPORATION- A request to establish a Uniform Sign Program in connection with the proposed development of a 6-building industrial complex totaling 171,941 square feet of building area on 13.23 acres of land within the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and 7th Street - APN: 0209-211-24. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450. Dominick Perez,Assistant Planner,presented the report and PowerPoint presentation(copy • on file). In response to Commissioner Howdyshell he pointed out where the possible rail spur could be placed in the future and noted that they would lose some parking but that the site has an overage of parking provided. Item A-3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES C;= SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 4 Carl Vanderhoek, representing Scheu Management Corp said staff did a great job and had no additional comment. Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing and hearing and seeing none, closed the public hearing. Moved by Howdyshell, seconded by Fletcher to Approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19450, Design Review DRC2013-00565 and Uniform Sign Program DRC2014- 00250 as presented. Carried 5-0. H. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2014-00012 -COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC.-A request to change the land use designation from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial(GI)in order to construct a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park. (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases: Development Review DRC2014-0000127 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. I. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESMENT AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2014-00126 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. -A request to modify the Zoning Map to change land use designation from Industrial Park(IP)to General Industrial (GI)in order to construct.a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases: Development Review DRC2014-0000127 and General Plan Amendment DRC2014- 00012. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. J. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00127 - COMMERCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LP FOR CSF, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 139,983 square foot office/warehouse on a 6.6 acre project site located south of Mission Park Drive between Richmond Place and Buffalo Avenue in the Industrial Park (IP) Development District - APNs: 0229-401-06, 07, 08 and 09. Related Cases:General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014- 00126. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of the environmental impacts for consideration. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave the report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted the buildings to the east and west are at least double the size of Item A-4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 5 this developer's request. He said staff received a letter from Fish and Wildlife with concerns regarding the Delhi Sand Flower Loving Fly and the related biological study for the project. Steven Flower, Assistant City Attorney said provided the Commission agrees, a condition will be added to the mitigation measures of all three resolutions and will become pan`of the MMP. Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic and Community Development said Fish and Wildlife presented two possible remedies:either a back to back seasonal study or get an assessment from a biologist certified to perform Delhi Fly studies. Mr. Bloom said we recommend the applicant consult with US Fish and Wildlife and confirm this is taken care of suitably. He said adding the condition allows the project to move forward past the Planning Commission level and allows them time to address this fully before it reaches the City Council. ® Jim Robertson, Commerce Construction said they understand the condition and their biologist is investigating the situation. Chairman Wimberly emphasized the Commission recommendation and for it to be handled prior to the City Council hearing. He then opened the public hearing and seeing and hearing no comment, closed the public hearing. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said the project was well thought out and a reasonable solution has been proposed for the concern from the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Commissioner Howdyshell said it is the highest and best use for the land and liked the renderings. Commissioner Munoz agreed and added that it is well designed and fits in with the surrounding development. Commissioner Fletcher said the applicant provided more than what we asked for,it provides a good transition that makes sense, it provides jobs, commerce and revenue. Chairman Wimberly felt all the main points had been covered, the developer has stepped UP. Mr. Flower read the added condition into the record. • Prior to approval of a rough grading plan the applicant shall perform a DSF(Delhi sands flower-loving fly) survey to determine whether the project may affect the DSF and the results shall be provided to the Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office for review. All mitigation measures recommended by the biologist and/or Item A-5 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 6 Department of Fish and Wildlife Service shall be fulfilled prior to permit issuance. Moved by Fletcher, seconded by Munoz to Approve Design Review DRC2014-00127 and recommend approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2014-00126 and General Plan Amendment DRC2014-00012 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. All three resolutions were amended with the added condition regarding the biological study for the Delhi Sands Flower Loving Fly. Carried 5-0. K. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT MODIFICATION DRC2014-00774-SSRB GROUP, INC.-A request to modify an approved Conditional Use Permit (DRC2012-00057)to increase the hours of operation in order to open earlier for an existing restaurant and bar(Sixty6 Sports Lounge) located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Vineyard Avenue within the Specialty Commercial (SC) Development District at 8916 Foothill Boulevard, Suite K1. This action is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301, existing facilities. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented the staff report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted that he prepared the staff report and it has been signed and submitted by Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic& Community Development. Mr. Van der Zwaag called Deputy Kovensky to explain the memo they prepared regarding the establishment. Deputy Kovensky, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, said she and her partner are part of the ACT(Alcohol Compliance Team) and noted their inspections occurred June 1, 2013 to the present day. She said she is providing updated information (copy on file) referencing many violations and calls for service to the location including a murder in the parking lot, bugs in the alcohol, noise, outside speakers, flashing lights, open doors,refusal to post ABC & Business licenses, not enough security guards on site, not using an ID scanner, holding a car show and serving alcohol without a Temporary Use Permit, and opening early without a permit during World Cup Soccer. She noted that there was an incident involving a murder and although the murder suspect was kicked out of the establishment, the Police were not called and then the murder occurred after that. She said there is an outstanding fee of$575 to the City for false alarm calls as well as an outstanding admission tax payment. She said all of these items were noted because the deputies are required to do so. Commissioner Munoz asked what type of response/tenor the deputies receive when they ask for compliance. He asked about the bugs in the alcohol. He asked if the business owner is aware of the outstanding fees. He asked how the Police determine if a call for service specifically relates to this business. Item A-6 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION oN� MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 7 Deputy Kovensky said they asked three times for the ABC and Business License postings. She said they observe and document what they see. She said the fee issue was reported to her by Business Licenses and to her knowledge, the applicant is aware. She said the owners know what they should be doing as it is in their permits. She said fruit flies can get in the alcohol,ABC knows that, it is a common occurrence, but the counts for this business are above acceptable levels. She said the bartender should be diligently checking for them every day and they can be stopped with screw type tops or covers over the tops. She said the City charges a fee for false alarms which has not been paid. She said their call logs note the specific location. She said there is a variety of calls that pull our deputies away from other things in the city. Commissioner Howdyshell asked how many of these calls occur prior to the noon hour. • Deputy Kovensky said she did not have those statistics but said probably not many;most would be after the noon hour. Commissioner Fletcher asked what is causing the false alarms and Sixty6 and the Koffee Klatch. Deputy Kovensky said she could not specify that,there could be a number of causes. She said drunks shaking doors, spiders in the motion sensors, etc. are possibilities. The Koffee Klatch had none before Sixty6 Sports Lounge opened. Chairman Wimberly invited the applicant to speak. Bobi Bedi, SSRB group said the building was empty for 7 years; the wind can cause the alarm to sound and they have done what they can. Because it is a historical building they cannot replace the doors. He said the murder did not occur in their lot, it was across from the Flame Broiler,the person was drunk and in his business for only 15 minutes and he got kicked out-he said the reason there was an arrest was because of their parking lot cameras. He said the second fight occurred after the car show. He said Koffee Klatch has a band louder than their speakers which are only 60 watts. He said he would buy dinner and drink for anyone to come and hear that it is not his speakers that are causing the noise. He said changing the doors would keep the flies out, but they can't change them or install airflow units over the doors either because they cannot attach anything to the building. He said they never have flies at their other locations. He said they have greatly reduced the number • of fly bottle counts down to 6. He said they can only have one small sign. He said they cannot put anything on the walls. He said they are penalized because the building is historic. He said they keep the doors open because they do not want it to be like a nightclub;they want it to be more like a lounge. He said they have made mistakes because Item A-7 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION C MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 8 they have never had a business like this, but suggested that rather than slap their hands, help them out. He said nothing in their permits say the doors have to be closed. He said their permit says they need one guard for every 75 people. He said with the boxing matches they always have 3 or 4 security guards. He said with respect to the report of flashing lights, the lights do not flash, they change colors very slowly, it is almost unnoticeable. He said Koffee Klatch has doubled their business because of them. He said seven new tenants have come into the center since they opened. He said they will make changes that will work. He said he did not sponsor the car show and he did not provide alcohol in the lot. He said when they discovered it, they called. He said they did make the mistake of opening early for the World Cup. He said if they only have 6 DUI's then they are doing something right-he said their bartenders are really well trained. He said their plan does not state that they have to call the Police if they have someone that is intoxicated. We do not serve them anymore and walk them out. He said it is not mentioned when you do something right. He said with respect to the owed fees that he would pay them tomorrow. Sunil Sethi said the deputy has been there three times. He asked if she has seen any improvement with the flies and if they are going in the right.direction. Chairman Wimberly said there could not be a dialogue between him and the deputy at this time. He said their question can be referenced to the staff and to work with them. Commissioner Munoz asked the purpose of the outside speakers and if other businesses have complained. Mr. Bedi stated they are only for games, they are not connected to their live music system. He said the other businesses have not complained even once. They(Wine Tailor&Koffee Klatch) both have live bands outside and they understand. Chairman Wimberly asked Mr. Bedi if he is onsite. Mr. Bedi said he and the partners are onsite all the time at all of their locations. Commissioner Fletcher asked the deputy if she has observed any progress. Deputy Kovensky said not all on the list are violations, some are just statistics. She said there has been improvement in the number of bugs in the alcohol. Commissioner Munoz asked Mr. .Bedi if he is aware that a permit is needed for special events. He asked, Off you knew that, why did you open anyway?" Item A-8 • HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION c�=i MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 9 Mr. Bedi said the only time they did that was for the World Cup. They had many requests to open, so they did, it was the only time. Commissioner Fletcher said he is on notice and he is assuming(Mr. Bedi) knows the items to be corrected and that he (Mr. Bedi) had no objection to working on them. Mr. Bedi said he will make sure those are handled. Commissioner Fletcher said the Police only come if someone complains. He said you have to take that into account. He said at night, at the location of this business, sound travels. He said complaints have been received from the Red Hill area at night regarding truck noise. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said he has visited the site several times and similar establishments • and none are open before 11:00 am. He asked what they will be doing at 9:00 am and if they would be serving alcohol at 9:00 am. Mr. Bedi said the only reason is that Sunday games start at 10:00 am on Sundays and they are packed by 9:45 am. He said they want to be sure they can serve them-breakfast, Blood Mary's, Mimosas etc.;we want to be sure we are ready and that they do not want to violate their opening time. He said they would only be open on special sport event Sundays not even on Saturdays. Commissioner Howdyshell said she understands the importance of a missed kickoff time. She said most violations likely occur after the noon hour. She said this establishment has designed a business so people have a place to go if they want to watch the game. She said a historical building does have limitations and restrictions and we should see what can be done to assist the business. She said the business owners want to comply and we would like to see them succeed. She said she also wants to move forward with staffs recommendation for a 6-month review. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said the applicant has disputed/disagreed some aspects of the deputy's report. He said many should be easy to clarify such as what is to be posted, doors open/closed, we want clear agreement. He did not see how they could move forward if there is anything the applicant disagrees with is in the permit language. He said he is concerned about what is in the report and what they disagree with. He said he takes the deputies report at face value. You need to read and understand what you agreed to. • Mr. Bedi said he did not see anything in the report he disagrees with but the number of flies in the alcohol has dropped, the number of false alarms is down. He said they had noise complaints in the first 3 months but none since then. He said with respect to the doors open/closed, it just seems to be communication -if the City says they have to stay closed Item A-9 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 10 then, they will keep them closed. He said this is the first he has heard of this. Commissioner Fletcher asked about the report of stolen TVs. Mr. Bedi said prior to their opening they hired a plumbing contractor that they caught stealing TVs and that was one of the calls. He said they are not worried about the number of calls. He said they want to make sure they do not have another incident like the murder, they cannot call every time someone is asked to leave the bar. Commissioner Munoz said we are here to help. He suggested they read their agreement and understand it. He said they knew going in it was a historic building and that would limit what they could do. He said they can't get upset about that as they knew the rules. He said there is no joy in seeing the building empty. He said it is not the City telling you can't do something for some other reason. Commissioner Munoz said the City wants them to be successful. He said he did not have a problem with the two hours, but he does have a problem with violating the permits. Mr. Bedi said it is frustrating to see other buildings-they have better signage. He said, you will never see us violate the CUP ever again. 'If you walk out there and tell us our speakers are loud, we will take them out." Chairman Wimberly opened the public hearing. Seeing and hearing none, closed the public hearing. He then commented and said the City approved their permits and they agreed to all the requirements. He said the request for more hours is admirable but there is a compliance issue with the rules of the existing permits. He said he did not see for public safety an extension of time if they are not in compliance. He said the recommendation from staff is to give them the hours and then bring them back in 6 months. He said he is.not supportive of this request. He said when we see they can be in compliance with all the rules and regulations then we can entertain the request for additional hours. Commissioner Fletcher said the applicant would like to comply and are willing to comply. He said he did not see a big issue with their request for two hours and how that triggered a report from the Police and ACT. The ACT reported on what has gone on here. He said he understands false alarms and they need to do what they need to do to reduce that. He said the murder was probably people at the wrong location at the wrong time. He said�fights is not a lot but security needs to escort them out and if you don't think you can control it then call the cops. He said people may drink too much and get out of hand at a bar. He said `calls for service'is a double edged sword-you are supposed to call to diffuse the situation but it also adds to the tally. With respect to noise issues-make sure they don't exceed the approved levels and be aware people may complain. He said uncapped bottles get flies- cap them and check them. Item A-10 i HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION PRE10- MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 11 Commissioner Munoz said it is no different from other restaurant/bars in the City-we ask them all to comply-some have and some haven't. He said the Commission will visit this again in 6 months. He said this can be fixed and their attitude about this-He said this is part of doing business. He said you have a better opportunity to make money above that of most people. He said he has no problem with giving the 2 extra hours-you made a commitment-and we are ready to try to help. If you get the idea to open/close at the spur of the moment-don't do it. He said the recommendation is to allow the earlier 2 hours in the morning and then we come back for a review. He said this gives ample time to address this and if they have problems, work with the staff. He said we have a great staff and excellent police; they've worked with us before. He said they just report the facts. He said he believes the business owners can do a good job there and he has faith in them. He said he should read his permit thoroughly and get his staff to follow it. Commissioner Howdyshell said she applauds the owners and believe the corrections will be done. She said she supports the staff recommendation as it is important for the business and the City. She said the 6-month review is just a minor thing to do to look at where we stand today from 6 months from now. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said it was disconcerting to read the deputy's report. He said he is glad staff recommended we revisit this in 6 months. He echoed Commissioner Munoz' comment that it is all black and white regarding the fact that their permits are their guiding lights. He said the applicant has proven they can operate various businesses in the City. He said this is a new business concept for them; and even after a year or two there are rough patches and changes that occur. He said he supports the request but noticed the competitors do not open this early and perhaps this may be a new opportunity. He said he would like to see them re-visit in 6 months for the improvements. He said be clear about posting their signage, security levels and continue good decisions demonstrated at the other businesses. He thanked them for being here. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Fletcher to approve the CUP Modification request as presented with staff's recommendation for a 6-month review. Carried 5-0. �""1 :+�:'s;.V':".V' ,k 6 :,_J•lJl\'`'` ) FY Tq~,,�(�JT 2..ft F �4 ��'"0�' I V-, ..1U:Y17 ,•• ';�'L-1 O7.-] .:yg. ,s' i'"�'l A-" ae7'si .'� •F'✓A�fn'':nG^. _ e�., v4V��,,4h,Yl.��� 1 .�:�'...�:•-ya ,Y �_��.��.4`+,T�L•ir`: -'' � .:y: _ _ _ y '+t'!-r'" '.!] ::.as',,..9i::��:r••''�'+n.�Fe: �: .e•:�wr%'Y;,.. ..T." �+�.i :i.. i`•� ?•:i• •A, ' ��•.� \;N. ~IJ� 'I���s'I�'':-IS so`i6::^.:.'�ti.yA.� St.,. ..... _ >C.i -_ .ray;::.sx•��:_-.i�'.:o::.y6 :L•r-��:-So.':e.1v.Y3�,_z. _-+�•�.s _5�.. .� .s�a...:s���'•',.._.3-_13�.".�.�.�'<Y_�r�_=�^' :+1: Chairman Wimberly offered a hearty "welcome back!" was offered to Commissioner ® Fletcher. Commissioner Munoz offered congratulations to the new Chairman, Ray Wimberly and Vice Chairman Francisco Oaxaca. Item A-11 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 12 Commissioner Munoz commented on how difficult it is for our deputies and noted his trust in their reports and commended them on their work. Commissioner Howdyshell also commended the deputies and said the work they do is a reflection of our City standards. She said our City is seen as a safe city and that we and our Police take that seriously. w THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL IMMEDIATELYADJOURN TOA WORKSHOP TO DISCUS PRE- APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2014-00613—ALTA RANCHO. THE WORKSHOP WILL BE HELD IN THE RAINS ROOM. Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic and Community Development noted that the applicant withdrew his application and therefore the workshop would not be held. The Commission adjourned at 8:30 PM 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee,hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 18, 2014, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position,you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. Item A-12 ® HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 Page 13 It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning ® Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us Item A-13 STAFF REPORT • ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPART'NIENT RANCHO DATE: October 8, 2014 CUCAMONGA TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer BY: Betty A. Miller, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: SUMMARY VACATION OF A PORTION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE, NORTH OF 6TH STREET(V-226)—A REQUEST TO FIND THE SUMMARY VACATION OF 9,337 SQUARE FEET OF EXISTING CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE NORTH OF 6TH STREET IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN — APN 229-271-33 AND 229-284-01. RELATED FILES: DRC2006-01012 AND DRC2013-00541 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission make the finding, through minute action, that the proposed vacation is in conformance with the General Plan. This finding will be forwarded to the City Council for further processing and final approval. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Originally a 120-foot right-of-way was dedicated for Orange Avenue on the Map of Rochester that recorded February 23, 1889. The east half of Orange Avenue was vacated December 18, 1936. Orange Avenue subsequently became known as Rochester Avenue. On June 11, 1986, Parcel Map 9530 relocated Rochester Avenue to accommodate a future freeway ramp at 6th Street. On January 19, 2007, Parcel Map 16139 adjusted the alignment of Charles Smith Avenue(Old Rochester),to intersect Rochester perpendicularly and align with Charles Smith on the south side of 6th Street. On August 13, 2008, the Planning Commission approved DRC2006-01012 for the construction of an industrial warehouse building at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Charles Smith Avenue. On August 28, 2013, the Planning Commission approved DRC2013-00541, a time extension for said development. One of the conditions of approval for this development was the vacation of excess right-of-way on the east side of Charles Smith Avenue. The related public improvement plans are currently in plan check. The General Plan calls for a street right-of-way of 66 feet (33 feet measured from the centerline) with a parkway width of 11 feet for Local Industrial streets such as Charles Smith Avenue. The existing curved centerline alignment was shifted 57 feet to the west at 6th Street, leaving excess right-of-way on the east side of the street ranging in width from 11 to 54 feet. A vacation back to 33 feet measured from the street centerline is in compliance with the General Plan. Since the portion of the existing right-of-way proposed to be vacated has been superseded by the relocation of Charles Smith Avenue, a summary vacation is allowed under the Streets and Highway Code of the State of California. Item B-1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 8, 2014 Page 2 Respectfully submitted, Dan James Senior Civil Engineer DJ/BAM:Is Attachments: Vicinity Map Exhibit °A": Legal Description Exhibit°B": Plat Item B-2 y � N ar H r u jem&i Blvd 4 � p 6th st r f fi r� t !! t Q NORTH I I NTS CITY OF ITEM: V-226 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE: Vacate Portion of Charles Smith Ave. ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT EXHIBIT: Vicinity Map Item B-3 EXHIBIT "A"- LEGAL DESCRIPTION PUBLIC ROAD VACATION THAT PORTION OF THE WEST 60.00 FEET OF ORANGE AVENUE AS SHOWN ON MAP OF ROCHESTER, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 9 PAGE 20 OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE AND SIXTH STREET AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16139 RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 218, PAGES 59 THROUGH 61 INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 89045'25" EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SIXTH STREET A DISTANCE OF 56.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°10'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 0.15 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°50'29"EAST CONTINUING ALONG SIXTH STREET DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00010'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST 60.00 FEET OF SAID ORANGE STREET VACATED BY • DOCUMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 18, 1936, IN BOOK 1177 PAGE 320, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89050'29" WEST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 60.00 FEET NORTHERLY MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE TO THE CENTERLINE OF SIXTH STREET, A DISTANCE OF 29.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45043'13" WEST A DISTANCE OF 33.55 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 467.00 FEET, TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 86°36'09" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09024'09" AN ARC LENGTH OF 76.64 FEET, SAID CURVE BEING 33.00 FEET EASTERLYAND CONCENTRIC TO THE CENTERLINE OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP 16139 RECORDED IN PARCEL MAP BOOK 218, PAGES 59 THROUGH 61 INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, TO WHICH POINT A RADIAL LINE BEARS NORTH 77°12'00" WEST; THENCE NORTH 12048'00" EAST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 33.00 FEET EASTERLY MEASURED AT A RIGHT ANGLE TO THE CENTERLINE OF CHARLES ® Page 1 of 2 Item B-4 SMITH AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 89.21 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 533.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 12018'59" AN ARC LENGTH OF 114.57 FEET, SAID CURVE BEING 33.00 FEET EASTERLY AND CONCENTRIC TO THE CENTERLINE OF CHARLES SMITH AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP,TO WHICH POINTA RADIAL LINE BEARS SOUTH 89030'59" EAST; THENCE SOUTH 89049'07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 10.74 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF .THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST .60.00 FEET OF ORANGE AVENUEAND THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 30.00 FEET OF THE WEST 600.00 FEET OF LOT 94 OF MAP OF ROCHESTER; THENCE SOUTH 00010'53"WESTALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE EAST 60.00 FEET OF ORANGE AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 299.68 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 9,336.69 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART THEREOF. PREPARED BY: A N W. R N, PLS 5306 A E Page 2 of 2 Item B-5 EXHIBIT ►FBI► P UBLIC R OAD VA CA TION l01[►L LAND S89• ����r `3`9 E �R) L4 5 p I ' OF C Ll� 0 � � N ti W p M U I U ONN W o=W W Q CURVE DATA �c�Q��-? C A T R L 01 a o r 0 1 13'02 35 57.16 500.00 113.82 '1 h W,L cn w^v 2 09'24'09" 38.40' 467.00' 76.64 ti R� �• o� z 3 12'19'08" 53.96' 500.00' 107.48 ry I ?Q o W o c 4 12'18'59" 57.51' 533.00' 114.57' 2M :2Mix < Qat o� LOWavZW ``'a v 0° LINE DATA mw }rn z LINE BEARING DISTANCE �--a a m^can a 1 N89'50'29"E 30.00' En La 0 E tw 1g0cy cV o 3 W W 0 W p l-0: 2 S89'50'29"W 29.55' W Co.iw h 3zoa- OO 3 N45'43'13"W 33.55' Ncool i<W a C-) a 4 S89'49'07"E 10.74' Oix>COU C� N00'10'53"E SIXTH STREET 33 0.15 " N89'50'29"E N v 30' N89'45'25"E _ I U � DETAIL "A" II I N86-36'09-Y NTS POB I L2 4i U 3 SEE DETAIL �� h M N M"A" HEREON oh C! I ov- cpo Z ' L1 i SIXTH STREET LN89'45'25"E 56.97' N89'50'29"E POC SHEET 1 OF 1 Item B-6 i STAFF REPORT • PLkNNING DFPARnIFN"I' RANCHO Date: October 8, 2014 CUCAMONGA To: Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Commission From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner Subject: HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00769 - JASON & JULIE LEONARD - A request to designate the Jamison House as a historic landmark within the Low Residential (L) District, located at 8204 Archibald Avenue; APN: 020837714. The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. Related case: Mills Act DRC2014-00770. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. MILLS ACT DRC2014-00770 - JASON & JULIE LEONARD - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Jamison House, a potential historic landmark located at 8204 Archibald Avenue - APN: 020837714. .The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. Related case: Landmark Designation DRC2014-00769. This item will be forwarded to the City Council for final action. • RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval of Landmark Designation DRC2014-00769 and Mills Act DRC2014-00770 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action. BACKGROUND A. Previous Review: On June 2, 1988, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) voted to recommend landmark designation of the Jamison House. However, because of an objection from the owner, the landmark designation was put "on hold" until further notice, and the item did not move forward to the City Council for final approval. Today, the current owners of the property, Jason and Julie Leonard, are in favor of designating their property. B. Historical Significance: The subject structure, located at 8204 Archibald Avenue, was built in 1926 by I.T. Jamison and was surrounded by 19 acres of deciduous fruit trees, including peaches that were packed in the back shed. A garage with clapboard siding standps next to the peach shed. The two buildings are similar in shape and size. According to the 1988 Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report, the Jamison family name appeared on the 1909 check register of the First National Bank of Cucamonga. This information came from an interview with the late Ms. Ada Cooper. The Craftsman style residence is in great condition. It is a one-story structure with an east-facing fagade, side gable roof with a medium pitch. wide eaves, exposed rafter tails and decorative wood venting under the gable peaks. It is of wood frame construction, wood clapboard siding with river rock cladding on the porch columns and porch wall. The front • fagade entails a full-width front porch and double-hung wood windows. ITEM C&D1 HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00769 MILLS ACT DRC2014-00770-JASON &JULIE LEONARD October 8, 2014 Page 2 Ownership History: According to the San Bernardino County Assessor's information, ownership history is as follows: 1921-1935— I.T. Jamison 1936 — Lucas Ranching Company 1937-1947 — Helen Need, M.J. Agnew, et.al 1948-unknown — Maddalena and Franesco Valli unknown-1975 —Carl and Margaret Brancacio 1975-2004 —Charles and Rose McLane 2004-2012 — Uribe family 2012-2013 —bank owned 2013-current—Jason and Julie Leonard C. Site Characteristics: The project site is on a rectangular-shaped parcel (approximately 0.28 acre), located approximately 615 feet south of Foothill Boulevard. The lot is zoned Low (L) Residential. Properties to the north, east, south, and west are also zoned Low (L) Residential. ANALYSIS A. General: The house was identified in the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2009 historic survey results, performed by Chattel Architecture and was classified as a "5S3" classification, which means it "appears to be individually eligible for local listing or designation through survey evaluation." Based on earlier research and staff reports to the Historic Preservation Commission in 1988, staff found the property to be eligible for local designation. The house has had minor changes to the exterior such as new doors and a back porch that was enclosed, according to the McLane family. However, even today, the house still remains with sufficient integrity. B. Landmark Designation: The subject site qualifies for landmark designation based upon much of the criteria from the City's Historic Preservation Ordinance, including such significant areas as historical and cultural significance and integrity. Details related to these areas of significance are contained in the Facts for Findings Section. The purpose of the designation is to preserve, protect, enhance, and perpetuate a significant feature that contributes to the cultural and aesthetic benefit of Rancho Cucamonga. C. Mills Act Agreement: In accordance with City policy, the owner has requested a Mills Act Agreement. The Agreement Schedule List of Improvements has been drafted and reviewed and is attached for reference (Exhibit E). The concept of the Mills Act Program is to provide an incentive for the property owner to protect and preserve the property by retaining its characteristics of historical significance. This intent is encouraged through the reduction of property taxes, thus enabling the property owner to reinvest the money saved from the reduced property tax on the improvements. The properties that enter into the agreement are to be inspected by City staff on an annual basis to determine whether notable progress has ITEM C&D2 i HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014=00769 MILLS ACT DRC2014-00770-JASON &JULIE LEONARD ® October 8, 2014 Page 3 been made in rehabilitating the property. Staff estimates the property tax savings to the owner could be as much as $1,380 per year. The exact amounts are dependent upon the County Assessor's property valuation, which is based on income potential and capitalization rate at the time of the assessment. D. Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. FACTS FOR FINDING: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: It is or was once associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. Facts: The property is a prime example of the local agricultural economy, which was an important part of early Cucamonga. Findinq 2: It is or was once associated with persons important to local, California, or national history. ® Fact/s: The property is associated with the Jamisons, who were an early family that grew deciduous fruit trees, an important part of the local produce supply of the area. Findinq 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction. Fact/s: The dwelling is a good example of Craftsman architecture and has been well maintained. Finding 4: It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Fact/s: The structure and property has potential to yield information about the local agricultural economy. B. Integrity: Finding 1: Historic Landmarks must retain integrity from their period of significance with respect to location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association, or any combination of these factors. A proposed landmark need not retain all such original aspects, but must retain sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. Neither the deferred maintenance of a proposed landmark, nor its dilapidated condition shall, on its own, be equated with a loss of integrity. Integrity shall be judged with reference to the particular characteristics that support the property's eligibility. Fact/s: According to the DPR 523 record form completed by Chattel Architecture as part • of the General Plan Update in 2010, the proposed landmark retains high integrity from their period of significance with respect to setting, location, materials, ITEM CRM HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00769 MILLS ACT DRC2014-00770-JASON &JULIE LEONARD October 8, 2014 Page 4 workmanship, association, design and feeling. It retains sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. CORRESPONDENCE: The Historic Landmark Designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet of the project site. Respectfully submitted, 1 A Candyce Burnett Planning Director CB:MN/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - 1938 Historic Aerial Exhibit C - DPR 523 Record Form Exhibit D - Photographs Exhibit E - Draft Mills Act Contract DRC2014-00770 List of Improvements Draft Resolution of Approval for DRC2014-00769 ITEM C&D4 -qW., �Fel.� ...rM1�f�.e.�•• �yr�� �` /. _ �,. �„ • ems}'i p ► :3 !*'fit i 7 .t `` t ( T Ji o lb 61 h.-7711 lit � .; II' �'" � {- i .. •� A � + �" H �3.x.0. '� j • r .� M +.t , s:! 4A'7! 4►v., • 4i6 $ t *.�rlssl�... 1�k r? �. .. _ l _ ` » % y Or A •r� + •�� r ., at 1� YWrs 04* 0*00 •i•i+ • ia►1 +iii.. f9Rli — f i�a�rTwt��r1 1 ��!• • !R Z« ! t �■•1i►iswli +�f • • • �`��rt ri ;i •ri 1*I/ia� ilei si460400 . R4 4 w♦ : ' wtifwa. baa Tiw- • • *♦ ,t�1• Ole a* 4two wi t#• •s tr . . .arra• A 0419480A a too* �► ars• ��•� t� w .�+► s .. s•�� t7ri� • s#II►•#i t • •'Ii1t� � ,air alw+�+r• �• . .� aMwa w ` •�• .ry�ratftM� .. � . • 'v fir j � _ -�..- � �' + `x �'� x �.. ', it *f�►it M R n4 # 1rs• ♦& CO 00 r�r xt w m R t +eft s Q1 r •s R .-f 1 !�. ii s"S i int►. - tf !!A 100050R4►t irR t some � ii � � R .R!lt.R•rttttt 40 lot lot lei tf tl !�•Kiir � s 4 tItJ1►tl aws>t 40, EXHIBIT B �..� : ITEM C&D6 State of California-The Resources Agency Primary# DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 5S3 Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 1 *Resource name or#:(assigned by recorder)Jamison House P1. Other Identifier: W. Location:_Not for Publication 2�Unrestricted *a.County:San Bernardino *b. USGS 7.6'Quad: Date: T R 1/4 of 1/4 of Sec M.D. B.M. c. Address: 2a Archibald Ave City: Rancho Cucamonga d. UTM:Zone: 10 mE/ nN(G.P.S.) e. Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel#, directions to resource, elevation,etc., as appropriate) APN:,20837714 Previous status code: PLL:5S2 *123a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design,materials,condition,alterations,size,setting and boundaries) A)Property type: residential, building B)Setting: in residential area on major thoroughfare;2 buildings on site;site contains fencing and driveway C)Architectural style:Craftsman D)General characteristics:facade faces east; 1-story; side gable roof with medium pitch,wide eaves,exposed rafter tails,and decorative venting under gable peaks; rectangular plan; no basement visible, 1 vertical division,wood-frame construction,wood clapboard siding with river rock cladding on porch columns and porch wall E)Specific features:full-width front porch,wood double-hung windows arranged in trios at front; primary entrance at front with single door;secondary entrance at side with single door F)Decorative elements: none G)Major alterations:fenestration and entrances H)Integrity level:high 1)Retains integrity: setting, location, materials,workmanship, association,design,feeling *P3b. Resource Attributes:(List attributes and codes): HP2.Single family property *P4. Resource Present: X Building Object District Structure Site Element of District Other PSa. Photo or Drawing - � PSb. Photo no: 3470-3471 *P6. Date Constructed/Age and Sources: X Hi t ri Prehistoric Both DOC: 19226 v_ " _ `+ W. Owner and Address: unavailable �. *P8. Recorded by: / Jenna Snow, Gabrielle Harlan and Kathryn b McGee,Chattel Architecture, Planning& �J Preservation, Inc., 13417 Ventura Blvd., Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 A •x ��, '�'t. + 'aSTyt.:d,-•! ' 'yyAV *P9. Date Recorded:2/2009-9/2009 *P10. Survey Type: Reconnaissance *P11. Report Citation:Chattel Architecture,Planning&Preservation,Inc.Historic Resources Survey of Rancho Cucamonga. Prepared for the City of Rancho Cucamonga as part of the General Plan Update,2009-2010. *Attachments:ZC None_Location Map_Sketch Map_Continuation Sheet_Building,Structure,and Object Record_Archaeological Record _District Record_Linear Feature Record_Milling Station Record_Rock Art Record_Artifact Record_Photograph Record_Other: EXHIBIT C ITEM C&D7 s"� s .r r> C_ iMra�S��ht's ,k. �:Kt�"r ,, "�`R� •,.�.'� r ti�h�'4 � �+►., ,N�., p`�T. Accessory Structure F , + l � 1 �r � T I .r• Side Elevation of Residence wf �r Rear • r. ��- '�.• ,�. {{ �� Cis :. - -WE , • _ : M » ._. AM �, ���`\�,• �:A. '� � ;fit POTENTIAL HOME IMPROVEMENTS for ® Jason Leonard and Julie Leonard 8204 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 The following is a list of renovation projects the applicant plans to complete. Future projects proposed by the applicant or by the legal inheritors of this contract will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation commission's staff. ITEM TASK 1. Install north-facing screen door (in 1920's style) 2. Install garden box on north-facing fence line 3. Re-paint exterior 4. Install driveway • EXHIBIT E ITEM C&D11 RESOLUTION NO. 14-02 • A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00769, DESIGNATING THE JAMISON HOUSE A HISTORIC LANDMARK, LOCATED AT 8204 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 0208-377-14. A. Recitals. 1. Jason and Julie Leonard, filed an application for a Landmark as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark is referred to as "the application." 2. On October 8, 2014, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found,determined, and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part 'A" of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. The application applies to approximately 0.28-acre of land, basically a rectangular-shaped configuration, located at 8204 Archibald Avenue. 3. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 8, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, and pursuant to Section 17.18.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, this Commission hereby makes the following findings and facts: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: Finding 1: It is or was once associated with events that made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history or the cultural heritage of California or the United States. Fact/s: The property is a prime example of the local agricultural economy, which was an important part of early Cucamonga. Finding 2: It is or was once associated with persons important to local, California, or national history. Fact/s: The property is associated with the Jamisons, who were an early • family that grew deciduous fruit trees, an important part of the local produce supply of the area. ITEM C&D12 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-02 HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00769 - JASON AND JULIE LEONARD October 8, 2014 Page 2 Finding 3: It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period,or method of construction. Fact/s: The dwelling is a good example of Craftsman architecture and has been well-maintained. Finding 4: It has yielded or has the potential to yield information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Facts: The structure and property has potential to yield information about the local agricultural economy. B. Integrity Finding 1: Historic Landmarks must retain integrity from their period of significance with respect to. location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, association, or any combination of these factors. A proposed landmark need not retain all such original aspects, but must retain sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. Neither the deferred maintenance of a proposed landmark, nor its dilapidated condition shall,on its own, be equated with a loss of integrity. Integrity shall be judged with reference to the particular characteristics that support the eligibility of the property. Fact/s: According to the DPR 523 record form completed by Chattel Architecture as part of the General Plan Update in 2010, the proposed landmark retains high integrity from their period of significance with respect to setting, location, materials,workmanship, association, design and feeling. It retains sufficient integrity to convey its historic, cultural, or architectural significance. 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder. The Council finds that this Landmark Designation is exempt under CEQA, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15331, as a Class 31 exemption (Historical Resource Restoration/Rehabilitation). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that, pursuant to Section 17.18.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of Landmark Designation on the 8th day of October, 2014. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2014. ITEM C&D13 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-02 HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014-00769- JASON AND JULIE LEONARD October 8, 2014 ® Page 3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ray Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga,do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission held on the 8th day of October 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ITEM C&D14 Y• STAFF REPORT • PI,INNING DEPARTMENT DATE: October 8, 2014 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission �,;UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Mayuko Nakajima, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - A request to create a Tract Map for an 8-unit townhouse development for a 1.02-acre site within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (in-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related cases: Design Review DRC2013-00824 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - Design review for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02 acre within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related cases: SUBTT18928 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00825 -ALEX MUSTAPHA-A request to remove 9 trees related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 and Design Review DRC2013-00824 for a 1.02-acre site within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street-APN: 0207-022-11. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928, Design Review DRC2013-00824, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of approval with conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residential and Townhomes— Medium (M) Residential District South - Single-Family Residential and Water Tank— Medium (M) Residential District East - Single-Family Residential— Low (L) Residential District West - Flood Channel — Flood Control (FC) District B. General.Plan Designations: Site - Medium Residential (MR) North - Medium Residential (MR) South - Medium Residential (MR) East - Low Residential (LR) West - Flood Control (FC) / Utility Corridor(UC) Item EFG1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18928, DRC2013-00824, AND DRC2013-00825-ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 2 C. Site Characteristics: The project location is a 1.02-acre site zoned Medium Residential (8-14 du/ac), located on the west side of Carnelian Street, south of Base Line Road. There is an existing single-family residence that is proposed for demolition as part of this project. The property is about 100 feet in width, and the lot extends approximately 441 feet west along the northern side and 431 feet west along the southern side (to the flood control easement). There is a regional trail along the flood control easement; single-family residential and a water tank owned by San Bernardino County Flood Control to the south; and both single-family and multi-family residential to the north. ANALYSIS: A. Tentative Tract.Map: The applicant proposes to subdivide the 1.02-acre parcel into eight (8) individual lots for the purposes of constructing an 8-unit townhouse development. Each lot is approximately 2,613 square feet. The driveway/fire lane area totals 13,368 square feet, and the open space area totals 7,631 square feet. B. Design Review: In conjunction with the tract map, the applicant is proposing to construct an 8-unit townhouse development along the south side of the property. The product proposes three bedrooms, a second floor, and a garage for each unit. The eight (8)townhouse units total to about 14,544 square feet, and lot coverage is approximately 20 percent. There is an open private/common space proposed, which includes an open lawn area, tot lot play area, and a barbecue/picnic area. Each unit will have a private landscaped front lawn area (298 square feet), with the exception of Unit 8 (198 square feet). This reduced landscaped area was to accommodate the pedestrian walkway that fronts all of the units. C. Tree Removal Permit: There are 41 trees existing on-site, and 11 trees are considered to be Heritage Trees. Of the 11 heritage trees, 9 are proposed for removal. The applicant is requesting to remove 34 trees total as part of the project. The arborist report submitted recommended that trees that are remaining should be protected with an orange temporary construction fence during construction. Removed trees shall be replaced by at least a 1 to 1 ratio; with tree species appropriate to the new site requirements. The landscape plans show a total of 56 trees that will be planted on-site. Six, 36-inch box trees, five, 24-inch box trees, and thirty seven 15 gallon size trees. D. Parking Calculations: Per Section 17.64.050, three bedroom townhomes shall provide 2 parking spaces per unit. Each unit has a 2-car garage. Visitor parking shall be provided at a rate of 1 per 3 units, which equals 3 parking spaces. These 3 spaces are provided at the west side of the project where the water line easement is located. Additionally, the garage was set back for each unit(with the exception of Unit 8), to allow the option for parking on the driveway. E. Cultural Resources Assessment: The applicant provided a cultural resources assessment for any potential historical impacts associated with the demolition of the existing residence on-site. The residence was built in 1961 in the California Ranch style. According to the study, the property did not fit the criteria for significance or eligibility as presented in the National Historic Preservation Act and/or California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); therefore, the proposed redevelopment of the property will not result in any adverse impacts. Item EFG2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBTT18928, DRC2013-00824, AND DRC2013-00825 -ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 • Page 3 F. Acoustical Analysis: The applicant included noise conditions and construction methods to reduce any noise issues related to project. The Acoustical Analysis was provided because the General Plan identifies Carnelian Street with a noise level that ranges from 60 to 70 dBA CNEL. A noise study is required for all residential development located within the noise contours where noise levels exceed 60 dBA as identified in the General Plan, Figure PS-9 and PS-10. As part of project, these specific noise reduction methods were built into the project such as installing STC glazing to all windows and doors for Units 1 and 2. The proposed cement mortar unit block over stucco perimeter wall should provide adequate noise control barriers for the private yards for Units 1 and 2 as noted in the study. Specific wall construction methods will be incorporated into the building construction plans to reduce unit-to-unit noise. G. Trail Head: The General Plan indicates a proposed Trail Head (Figure CS-3)just west of the project site. There is a steep slope, approximately 20 feet in grade difference that exists towards the west side of the site, adjacent to the regional trail. Because of the size of the project and the existing topography, staff has determined that access to the trail was not feasible. H. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at the Best Western Heritage Inn on 8179 Spruce Street, Rancho Cucamonga, on December 12, 2013. No one from the public attended the meeting. I. Grading and Technical Review Committees: The project was reviewed by the Committees on • June 17, 2014. The Committees recommended approval of the project without changes. J. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca and Granger) twice; once on June 17, 2014 and on September 2, 2014. At the first meeting, the Committee did not recommend approval of the project and asked that the applicant work with staff on the design. The overall comments provided by the Committee were that the units are identical and needed some variation. The windows and doors were all similar and "cookie cutter." It was recognized that the site is constrained by its small size and would be difficult to adjust footprints so the applicant would need to be creative. Suggestions from the Committee included: Utilize arched or recessed windows and doors, alternate the scalloped edges, include corbels, create variations in the roof line, use more iron work, recess the wall planes, and create borders around the windows. Since the meeting, staff met with the applicant to work on the design. Before the second Design Review Committee meeting, the applicant revised the design twice with staff to meet the design goals expected. They have creatively used the arched windows in various locations, added more ironwork to the second floor, included wooden doors and wooden sectional garage doors, included shutters, corbels, and the scalloped edging was utilized only on certain units to create variation. Some roof planes have been changed so that they are not identical, and windows have been updated to include mullions and bordered by lintels. On September 2, 2014, the Committee requested that these enhancements be carried out towards the south elevation as well, to achieve the design goal of "360 degree architecture." With this revision, the Committee forwarded the project to the Planning Commission with a recommendation of approval. K. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) • and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because the project Item EFG3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT " SUBTT18928, DRC2013-00824, AND DRC2013-00825 -ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 4 includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Barnett Planning Director CB:MN/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Neighborhood Meeting Sign-In Sheets (December 12, 2013) Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Action Agendas dated June 17, 2014 and September 2, 2014 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2013-00824 Draft Resolution of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825 Item EFG4 SITE UTILIZATION MAP IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA TRandW, 4V The Rlfa,tr PM 863 I O M -O II O O SCALE 1' = 100' -I 27 5 A I PART I I I I R 16 I I I I I MH L _ SHEET INDEX L OT 11 18 A 11 SITE ARCIIIf 1ECTMAL ATIONSITE PLAN y- N. 21/33 I I I I I A-1 ITAOR PLAN(MODEL-A-) E I 1 I I 1I1 wi FLOOIR�PLANNLAN:MODEEL EL C' —J A Al FICXIR PLAN IMODF3.'D') O'• L——— L—— I ——J ———— A4 OVFAALL ELEVATIONSIROOF PIAN A L ����-- A-7 ETEVATIONS(MODEL'A') \ yyn A-8 EI.BVAIIONS('ODL'L'0.1 L 3 A-9 ELRVATIONS(MODEL'C') I �� — A-10 L'LEVATI(NS(MODEL-D') 3 I�1 I , _ L-1 IRRIGATION PLAN Irl LANDSCAPE PLAN L-3 LANDSCAYEDETAILS T-I EXISTING TREE INVENTORY 'IF-]TufDGNAPRICSGRVEY \ 600' ——————J I I , I C-I (CrvwDETAILED s1TEINAN RA OPIPIAN OF S F5 m I G-3 f3 GGRMMGPLAN30FS -n \ I I I I G11 GRADING PLAN 4OF 5 y T \ I G-5 G,c.=Pew+F.F. 1 I TM-I TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 10E3 WATER TM-2 TINfAnvvl"'RA MAP DISTRICT 2OF2 1 1 LIN$ -I I w-1 womp ..nw.,«Acs r 1 PROPERTY - I 1 1 ap I � I I / \ q Lapp vi \ PM 17222 -J 38 A A I I MH 1 78- e•s Blim\ T 5783 I � / / 2 D 31 — -- Ro®TTars mmnT oFn CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mr ruN SITE UTILIZATION NM 7490 CARNELIAN BT.RANCHO CUCAMONGA ®•r .� DRC2013-00824 k SUBW18926 w.9z11 nFRauFom an p,Ep�ppa� AS 9aIM OIY DIC fIOI 0.CFb.� •,OWq�• TR MIDa:TILL nITT I MIO.Ara(6101(3101 0.1-M-10u8-FFFmm Rl(3Ia)Ma r .10 of ------.-.— ._ _— jfgaaaoGOyohoo.tom UNODT INF SlRE11N90N OF 1Lu.an_ fYn (pa Na. i i DEMO ALL DATES 1f3 i------------- p�� 1 76 __---- j DEMO EXIST. i� IJ •-T J EOE 0 3 L� EJ 1 DEMO CONCRETE z0ftm 1 1 \\ � 1 1 1 N :M OG4WANLY:GROW R OOMSTR CT10MT7FE YN 8ME_R 6JDE%L , EXISTING SITE PLAN /�f AQ LOT MFA:'1A16ACRF8116�IM FF.1 M 0.00RFREE,,„RAN(MODB.'AT O/sopy tRyLLMJ �M— ar•rJr IA6TFML.OI/giR tfER ACRE M FIODR RAN 111009.V) 11tIC70tJW06M M FLOOR P N Pmm C) \ I1 1.016.6-416-suNOs M 0.008 RAN p100g 97 TOITAIM TIYC7 \\ \\ AREA OF tiRUCI1RiE(sj 1ST.FIOM SAN&V M OVERALL FlEVA710N91RO.FFLM Ww YI�TTTMiA 1 1 M7 UNftl FIEVATI1619 DIEL'A7 SIM.GAP �4710�BflF�. \ \ X M UMI1j,'6,t ElEVA7gN9(YODEL 9T \\ \\ TOE N.T�G A•16 UMfp EIF/ATI01®p100EL0T \ 1 LOT OOWISIA L'Un I44AO1-802% LLC R ARROW \, OPEN PRNA7GCOLOCN SPACE:14,1868.F. p6 14.166144AM-SM G.9176i 1 1ATq AOO766 PARN6 A uwm.7A -16 FFACEF \ \ ALLEY ' ENT VL51T011 PARRNOREOUIREMEMF;441.77 ` g \\ 1\ lFERSUNR-tY.1-2T-69`ACESW4 3V• l3i5l O \ \ DRIVEAVY/� ELANE (PAt�—TT-_ _ } � Paml 1 1 yq4 a ms• i ii�l Yw.gV � .P V! ggerr ��V • � VPgIiJ aC.. �OIS VJ pygy� �ni V! �_ _ 1 1 IIUP-I Y! �)qa•q nq�i•q m�ir 4 q�q I� G /.mq unn�log4 I � J PYVI� �I�gnV� 1 yM6M1Yl PYI '�0~a�! tiV! �w><P VJ A J �/IVI IVY• Ile pis YJ PYIq Iw^VJ A J lu^v PV� pppp uQ/O 4 yMgVJ yMgYl MOVlY Iw liij IJ ryq.�1 Y! MgylV I VT + Z 1 1 1 1 WINWIZI l o IL ---- - .. Sol l or.• IL A 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN FQRJDHOTES...qn! IL � , 2 STORY TOWN HOUSE q�. A 9/8/14 i •i 1 t _ Ar ter G Ja� 110aFOYflI •Ir —_.— _._ NIIf]IE.TIaT � ]� rr.4 r.T fr_ ]-IP FS •'d �� f4 rr ffd r f rood 4 PlfT(M.l 9d wr p o rd wT sTxF �' e`'m�• rd - l fAIEb 0 i a tamoaa eauroo.. error O 4, L 9 e.• rr ra n Z moi. mau. y O O9 � rr r.v ze r-v rr nmoa N an]aT 9 O umrt w w � }-- — 4 xo•a varraa 4 • � 1-6.34 __ sTaa w 4 noaf A 41:16 r r 4 u+4 rwa 3 s]Tx 4 � % nr p arra � p 4 4 O :f:�� G OiCit01700!!4 O _ b eTaTua.eoc _r � � - am..!]fiF.l 8 f6L O.8 p 7lIxTAIiVB r1111CT 4 swr.O Ir Nhf.11leTfi!m w w Yar100. lNfrr b p 4 ; 4 4 Q ! wor w w ruLC Rxrr 4 - resew!]ru Oio as1l.lola! Fx ® 4 NINDOW SCHEDULE MNriI•fROMi'UNR 11 _— eerwurro•eo worn res.oxartar s� ]rpelo� I W r rr•sd Dawes uf•arxrt __�-.°.--_ f O res :d r rr fr rr 01p1RK x .rr oa.maramorr rr r �w . • s+•.ea rdwa]e]rteeoa xrxamomnrR a a. yr rr.rd nta]ctr ] Pr.FP RlrilrrrTJlgE aFrrElrrmlrwaTon•i FliO) SECOND FLOOR •d•fr (31-W afF,>•�,rr..,Fa,a AT]]a]) FIRST FLOOR O ' :r.fa —W (FRONT UNIT) (FRONT UNIT) IV •] r rasa FrFD60FFA rwF]6lcmaa+Fl+rwF>wPcwaaaordrl,ay. DOOR SCHEDULE(SOLID CORE( J V 11Q Ol7 fila£ IYFExt%MiM �Wa rd.fd fHIRr-a[rOWTME � a1] 1 1 Td.fd e•Ff11011 a9Yrlla FNE MTmI Z . raid e1EAO1 OIA)e SAe.16•]ETYrarwl a 1 Sr.1r [mmol rfo.rr WMrr Ix1ECTRarfq a W O rd.er errFA04 m rr.fr nwfraa>Fn re r mz-ln.rr rrmgl O 1&1pz� Ofa,1=i N o��F,FLOOR PLAN(MODEL A) /!� d��. IM*-1'4r A-2 siai14 ma wr .ra za r rr r ra rr rr rr fa y anew v-Iv vn• Y8 sour ra _ sarw rxmr ; maw wam rd A$6 -. .n..crxr b IOsrt,rrl S7b. 1,' osr b d AQI rrTl f1aDF :; rd ` wi1wY ,r,� K I. 10 O wor 3 ❑ b rmxoar aronaar - .w,mrr 9 O r � arxnE wrar w w h as r-w ro r-.P ra R S O — r 7•. PLbE Y QOfff 4.Or1 M' 4 i.- i F� YO LLIra61 ur 4 taraqurf R �' 8 )' 4 ax4 ""'i O arx Y k q tllfgll Rlrl[M. q r nou, ya. � vreo N oRemoaaAs4:.. 4 7ORATN[7rACT 4YN r11RTrrrtr h 4 rW,NOEIrarr a el q ,Fr rr r k .Ys e- yN . r7i - ro 1Qn A4iMO wear r q BOb N7NOOW 6CHEOUIE(WIK)-MIFROR UNIT NZ 4,S M otrnwat » rwr,care w _ 3 ra.ar oasedrmr a.orwrgrw,F — . rr.r Wr-.vr.icrne aarsrrwwlu®nar rr ra r8 ra er ra , rr.rd rauretiaR 04w3tlwaaOaonB1 ra ra rr rr ra } - r + rasa umrt J er wr ; waa W,w,rewBrgr .Fq wa r ra.rr axnar r ?a.rC xa.t nar,en E . Ia.eP PI.`w+wa.crorrmrun.rvw�mEtlr.�npi �o . f fr.ra i0®ar.xrlMNi}rLr,aaweuwy-arlPCrus l0lEMrlYA !: SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR (INTERIOR UNIT 2,4,8) DOOMSCHW (INTERIOR UNIT 2,4,6) a C1 UIE(R%)CORE)-MIERIOR UWIR.4.S 0 ,.i lo.orrArrr eos trsc,oa.omn , , ra.H FMn-ararMlllr ,., .� 1 r , ra.Ir r11FA,Ow�WllrrrlMrrA Z O f zr.rr rnwrn _ r :a.rr xrtaax e ; rasa O,fY r4r31prrirawy r rr.r+ nrrmor �^ ' r . vo.ra awrae�s,aarcl v W m ars.F�r tu�ro,r� W � N o FLOOR PLAN(MODELB)) PLAN(MODEL C 1a•w rar dw A-3 9,8/14 • ® • , t •I - Aa lIr I. — _ fr rr Y1rE 61e0 � EO fa •uumP 6i� I b ni011 PO6r f.W.1 rp j �a s I 4 /iWELOlr leaf 6D.UIGFAr �� IUOF Wr Sr@ Q IIOI.CEM C Yeru on w a 4 6MR1• nawa�o6_ /dig, -- b .6nuoau limbo, : O b noau 3 a 9 h b b �� fr ra !r it O7 4 O • ITEM S,P/E ,�, 4 GN160E bR - ti C wr. ti no. n,oA,l y 9 w 6 Ew ^ ton ONYYi k bZ " —---�--cael,rA er t M lf.a 9 0 I,o6r 4 I 4 O �b 1. POEEI O _.b 6,OM6f 6epYE r _f_I 1PJPrA1M TRACT T 6w.laOF.1 S sr1g0639' wAeYwatneur h 6-0,r 4 b 6►C b 4 5 NOP. w:Af*M#Rn IT N Mm 6 CA.elm Ot0lu.q><el Ne.OfY: WDIDOW SCHEDULE(VINYL)-INTERIOR UNIT IKf,5,7 n -- No.arrnwr ma rrrEILY6e.ENr - W wul 'r.rr .rr...wE�Nr OYFRIW4AlOYr —` --- , r.rr opaFrwyoen o r Bd• rr B8 _ f rr.Pa to uSElElrr0oo4 rrfavn0�.,rn S�i _ irfa.la 6alaefnsoorr —_ —_—._ � ra�r wE6allr r -ra.rer aoerlmlar, i —w-a l,.lfl,r cEn 0.obiAwEr,',r RmC1E 5EOErraBr.I LL role rwunr W ro.Pr plf.,+fl.lo,at sEomrtNNJwx6ex,6rme1 SECOND FLOOR DOOR SCHEDULE)SOUOCORE)-1"TERMUNRR65,7 FIRST FLOOR FF (INTERIOR UNIT 3,53)7) "°a^6 6� rr�ILaEeEwr J� W Tp,rp o, ,ter a (INTERIOR UNIT 3,5,7) y� : , rr.rr �Eneru,e.rlEr6,mI �� = ra.Pr 6E,mlol Z=o 6 lr•fr oL.sr 51AE116OIEtT'Ourfi) . s fYpp ,ea.ra owuoOMMT.,,.-' r7 a a f rr.rr x,Tlrw m6 RIrr.Ir alnEA m J V Wzo N IL 0 FLOOR PLANS(MODEL C) ow d A A-4 9/8/14 W. W— zu .0 w O .nays 4 8 won L—ZF ar TfWATM TRA" lz ;7+ LIN 4 rr r c CIL cp 4 r IL aorri 3 IN JF snw0lr WH)GW SCHEDULE(VOM) BACK uHrr#a b IL Z YEN1 4 —..V zo DOOR SCHEDULE(SOCIO CORE) Z SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR (RACK.UNIT) (BACK UNIT) 00 0 FLOORPLAN(MO A-5 9/8/14 X76 � 7 7 .. � � wn. t www • m. r wnr e • we.w c r I I PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 2 STORY TOWN HOUSE SHEET A-8 SHEET A-7 �SNEET A-f01— / SHEET A-9 — — / ownw w.uMn r 1 owso�saoW i l r 1 MMMAMM TRACT r MY.MIA•T sm ® ® 0 - ® �l4&4. 0 n � ® I: DSI 0 �., n � `nom n ® n � n ® nil m�°:,,>_ L SOUTH ELEVATION O LOOKING NORTH d SHEET A-7 J SHEET A.B O _ — --SHEETA-9 — �SNEET A-10 � „ _. 's NORTH ELEVATION L — — — J L _ _ _ J I o LOOKING SOUTH d� OVERALL BUILDING ELEVATIONS A-V 9/8/14 i S f i:. E. t t:. f' A� wows g Will Im. SOUTH ELEVATION-LOOKING NORTH WEST ELEVATION-LOOKING EAST � �E UNIT#1(MODEL W) UNIT#1(MODEL W) °"70100"w nrrwmrr.nuet wtv.awmua i ' 3rr ' nr•, w....m.■.ir am mow,°" . A I ,. wtnwrtwo � g IL s aaaw000n �� '. FFLtz7 EAST ELEVATION-LOOKING WEST NORTH ELEVATION-LOOKING SOUTH o UNIT#1(MODEL W) UNIT#1(MODEL W) p E: O ^� ELEVATIONS I` UNIT#1-(MODEL'A') vim.ra a—7 /_l 1. 9/8/14 F. t a �a� L t •arum u,r � �% ate' R - = b I = g t T1 SOUTH ELEVATION-LOOKING NORTH WEST ELEVATION-LOOKING EAST 9"19m UNIT#2.4,6(MODEL'S') UNIT#2,4,6(MODEL'B') Al 7L17TII�C7 r.n ewmao 49A,SE0 ,,..� — w.wueowumw - -- - ---'------ 9mE 99N h woo o � Ieaq�9aolff n000rrcnri, � mEoou iurxerm� Doane rn9o9sawen 916, c,ucaov..a, W waa.�raur ww9an nw. IY awe wKpw.l IL a p b vnnnm b J I ,IaMa9„r = _ a J ru ca awuc9 - -- A 19f FlOan aaM ~ �w 9i EAST ELEVATION-LOOKING WEST a3 S UNIT#2,4,6(MODEL'B') WDNORTH ELEVATION-LOOKING SOUTH a G UNIT#2,4,6(MODEL'B') ooze 0 ELEVATIONS A i UNIT#2,4,6-(MODEL'B') I d a_� a..,•a /1 9/8/14 »o� x Cw U L ' IJi 0.0011�' SOUTH ELEVATION-LOOKING NORTH WEST ELEVATION-LOOKING EAST our mnaw, UNIT#3,5,7(MODEL'C') UNIT#3;5,7(MODEL'C') '�'01-00�'� 70Ww7111e TP"7 rn suumem m �. mi=r IT J Ima1MJ Null ' .. uPmm MFl911M.1 volnvwu raanmmnm Floe :WG ImJ mtJ ,maR,,,NE J1D0.m1 ...In'MJ�" - U/.GVggE -- t 1et0.aon tccnolntoom A z EAST ELEVATION-LOOKING WEST NORTH ELEVATION-LOOKING SOUTH „d o UNIT#3,5,7(MODEL'C') UNIT#3i-5.7(MODEL'C') v o I o ' ELEVATIONS A UNIT#3,5,7-(MODEL'C') AA_n 7 918114 a� Fame ni rn, t Lj _ a f b SOUTH ELEVATION-LOOKING NORTH WEST ELEVATION-LOOKING EAST UNIT#B(MODEL'D') UNIT#8(MODEL'D') a9ce:.9so T tawrstrvs Hutt aurFa°ernaaa m a r aosra f.LL° a°oc IFrP R AKRM h rnm w.9aw (aj aaaaaa retro. W FMAMEOgK'IEa mF� rangm9es tioe W d —FL—. F --- -- 4 I 4 r ® �LI b -- b 19!0.0011 �— BEf.'IgrML00M O ,I ------------ EAST ELEVATION-LOOKING WEST NORTH ELEVATION-LOOKING SOUTH `J V i! UNIT#8(MODEL'D') UNIT#8(MODEL'D') W v I1 r'. @o duu c ELEVATIONS o w l UNIT#8-(MODEL'D') ^_ O t 9//'18/14 .i I I �I 'i ;1 9LEW W811 fit A go .. ....._. flu - � � � °� ; t o a E � ,fib;. . .. 3 • L o. 4 � 2 3 V�Ib�i4��1 CENTER LINE:CARNELIAN STREET o r PROPOSED(8)UNIT MULTI-FAMILY PROJECT cr !� 7490 CARNELIAN STREETP. IRRIGATION PLAN .M.A�.. A RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CALIFORNIA -- „� st... Toe.• 1.Y� :.L'R.. . I g���i� a\ 4? m0v '� \ m 6tl>tt�• tw , nw va '' ', � w''�.._. _. mrm w.urrev aaPe� aYi�vrow•esc Toa.v a au r w.um me ouoa nn ALLEY wvm.ao � r".---; �"��•� �, f--`_ -- _ .—a - —-- ._. __-...___ _.._____ ____________ YIFpI l/VE ._� I fill = . 1 I I • �� I 1 1 � __-__ __.(pAVEDII _ -.e� "— __.____a�e �-.-1 I aW,i � 1 naw a... ..>...... oma"REMMIT P.� .�. NtAft 7,LLG /T �� - aav...tv .' unv unv my vnw vnv vnv u•rw 1■ I 7faK Aaltaal PIT". D- + - �u .rwwY - ■ �ww.ow TIM(SMa9M71f w�Mu • PLANTING LEGEND aW d g "2s 5HRURs j A „Q T;RaTRIo TnKA ttAa1 Ssx�! Y1ne:6 rnM f11s Ptrl Mt ® a1lIF•a MYS 9II MEalp 1[QIO W r Oa aC rm11 .�.. � Y.�Y•In�W ®�a rtG (J ST nnM� n avo .,P®.5...... :r aatam M,r W O •,. .�...®�it..l a.n.•...wMr. P.�. J SIM tMW C d O ® lol.4 Ssl.MSD � �,.,�q 4.1 S M'IS.ot®.M1ps Mx SaPC nPi1a sp W z L9STAG TREE UCENU �ua.mmpm�evuln ® w+•aea ra rre. M. .f wn- ; 0 IY6 aYtW .K f.C10.MR ��'�aO.Oo.'��P WY.�•YYPI n:• Sntp R/R.S �.a� c=V MatM..oP.. M.M..Mm.PaP W L. ..o roMM�M .�.tm. .maP.P.®• ---- d v M. D pOpH� GA� CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN Lr2 t�•+� == 03/9/14 � �—aamo 7 POP-UP SPRAY HEAD WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER BACKFLOW PREVENTER LAWN DIVIDER O w !P'd• "^5 Nrg."t yp� aevro /' •aro a O — NL autNtO.w 9wi R Mxrm�I[WLL OltgM�1fl1� Oe�Rtl �rturt�o 1Lt�i0l1 fo�h p6rrlaY ORdOf�O0�21 SHRUB HEAD DETAIL TRENCHING REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 7VffaTM+"7 GROUNDCOVER SPACING 7A tsQwm L pa iWlilf iiST3" oa wu ,uc m .wr re.rapt t7c W.MMOO MM /T n.ure w.t ev aicre V1Lvt oar ttrtra Mat C 1 Fd�it�o E�br a G 1"777 (� tooar mta S�Owa¢�7 m POMI MM>a Iator is WQ qL a,1O1Cim aM�ID Vr o 'r �par wa.mea sa W r oo.roc rm rxv.nt a mates ecu Yn•a'w®rwtc 1"/r N Y rat RA aaV4 N IIOr WQ 19 �rryOrlrtllal ittaWe�M,C e M Q rlU orr¢ nVRYV1Vf ' rY9r gttBi tR�iR 't �i RLQ61 (Orrrel Va[re ono VKv[t p��ra OtMr Vat re OrrA VKVLi L GATE VALVE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE IN BOX .rasa e.e a memtt TREE PLANTING DETAIL e�r�ra E li 1'ea eti F = .. MS M a.errfaa Mr�r rAq p r W O MST e.rm tap recta ..W wa E EXMK a we v MEarea �mn vai a EOME F uF MM PUT.UWA ,o am.onoe O V 7n rcr a n7 w1"Q sveonm avert. r a mrVt:rw a ,••• eta n■van .we.et w en v rm ema RAIN SENSOR POINT OF CONNECTION SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL IL A LANDSCAPE DETAILS L_3 OU20H4 FBI II TREE 4 REMOVE S-Ili,-IF Go TREE W TREE I REMOVE ----------- REMOVE o REMOVE REMOVE I OZ lol pp), TREE 16 TREE 1. TREE 5 00 lot, REMOVE ME REMOVE 1-- uj w TREE20 v 67 F2 TREE 5 REE 17 TRFEVIS I REMOVE REMOVE REMOVE RESIDENCE REMOVE 3 ------l*EE I rr 10 1 REMOVE MEE ME 24 1 REMOVEO o5 1, REMOVE MEET ---AEE REE ------------- TREE 23 ---- CONCRETE TREE 12 REMKWES " 1 7 REMOVEe TREE 31 TREE! T96EE REmOvEo I REMOVE ME'. KEEP _ TREE ID pT"_AGMEE TT ME 33 L'_ 59 TEIEE_3r KEEP '=p'}f7 TREE'll TREE 71 -P KEEP KEEP KEE IE IRE 3RE,,,IjL- 0 .7 KEEP REMO NOTES: REMOVE 1.TREES TO BE KEPT WED TO MVE ORANGE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCE z RACED AROUND TRUNK TO PROTECT DURING CC*4TRucMWt 2 TREES TO BE KEPT TEED TRIM111M TO CORRECT STRUCTURE PRO,,,,. AFTER CONSTRUCTION 1 TREES TO BE KEPT%KX&D BE VMTERFD AND PROTECTED DURING CONITMIUcriom. 4c 4.REFERENCE ARSORIST REPORT FOR DETNUD TREE INVENTORy t: Zzo W z ovaa IL 00 061. EXISTING TREE INVENTORY T1 .0 11/04/13 JUNE 2013 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY IN THE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA T_ rN_ :n \ \\ \ ALLEY 1 � 1iti Citi iiy` -+leti i,�D papmY'' �I I i y� • L -__----_-- '14 \` •, ,�*\ .\ \ �KK.'. N JT-'. '� w'r /"� •C _ \\/\ 1 •;n•..:,. '41 IIY 14 A24 f._T��I • ,v � `,\ 'D4 lIDR ',a`'t` � f �lF .. ,MpMp '•... '.� Il , A'eeF DNRR lIF[5a41rt 1 e'e y.�a1 1 _ 1 IIH p,1 m co ,BVI'� -iQ O®M b[MW VO e]e A� • �'✓! f-�y( 1.-..�,'� le•� 'l I IEml11C6 , I :. � I i ( 1 1 1 1 ,yti ,n'Dr�L•.fYe1 ..wV� I� \ `g \ars • _:�, ...: z.k- -: -� , I e; , INJ (, 1 , Y,., 1e.n.Y.., ev,, � '': ,oi►�: .1.'. ,1•. I.v `� .r• fit, q /I Fd A - .__ 1--4—L =,r-i�.�x=.-:=,r-s e�Nii•a 1f 3 e FF its- sx- �"7�y � � I eFsoaoE I� t GRAPHIC SCALE ^ !Y LEGENDa LEQAL DEscFUPnoN I --g--- CMRNDE 1•�, ,MeT POe1pN 6 am,a<�I.a Alm1BP,N OF _---_— PeGImY I„E.eCrt-CP_•eY 1NF ,V. 6 TE a CALNMft M POI Y1r NO=I,D a M W 21 -——- f16MO tlNe MD/Do OOI,FA rM[L 6 e0p5•N TIF OFYK 01 TK mUN,Y --___-_ fDC[OF t011TJE,C D[meOFM OF iND mII111.0�a fpa0e5: e1DDI eN1 erfe11e1D a A POND G IIF fAS,1>H er SMD M. -- - - FDmro DIM Iw,Pvlr. DDNIM nr em:,MFMCE rano sw fwtt lea sD1.Pa + -• y OnSIND 1Dm noleE ,II,r•oII TIF SAl1IFleT melpl a SEo 10,,eND J�-} r�nc sroT oa ww V. 0 W Pmn ww emo nF.wnwr caem a Twv - - FD61N0 CNl,a1n ISE m11Mx reDPmrr mM.ETID rD alrrolDl mueY YTeIF11 YNSE W,IO 06ORT, CW1DT WJOI OOIRCT,W D® IFCOImFD OPO 4,PEO R bS1RAO ILL 114 N •efF1 YETfP e001I 6101 P115Ek e6 OriETE T erf.OmS. IFMLE IIOe1M M r0eFI1 FAE B.SSEIIE M0. li rll'FEST 4D1q tIE FAST 111E O SMD an orE»AY a °0 NOAH n �OF SUBTT18926 and DRC2013-00824 P1F rlrGMr, HbOO ft Tw r.S muWr DYO(e Da,10.T msrmrt ro A PONT b C •iXIaS mMtlETE reOdT SIQ DM THE Y•6106Y IDE Or mI1:TM SON,1v6Y SW NDK IIF e61E%Y If.OF Sb IDT,.to ro,MF nw ng =7SANDERSON—GUTIERREZ 06OeC1 P•NOITY ro TK PmD a eFr•DEn A ,DP of M:DN[ rDmau s••e s wre. Dxor�t-„ CW L ENGWWW & LAND SURVEYORS, INC N: MNIDeE GMC GD6s MFA N,NIAe 50 A.G IDl MJF '�G 91730 ,DeSe noon � � ease IaPaml AVI7AIF.S011E Ia-1fe,RYlpq I� Pssnaa a (909) 980-1211 J.N. 13-009 GARY T. SANDERSON. LS. 6462, EV. 9-30-13 TP-1 I tl SITE PLAN — TRACT MAP N0. 18928 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATS OF CA11FORNIA e E ALLEY E Cp1OiC1E$WEWAIK w PARKINGCA LE DEL PRADO b CALLS DEL PRADO — 6 "us rAu i 1 ONMETE SO WATT( E CONCRETE SDEWALK '�•"• NOTA PART — y (mN SPAM EASE R oNKur MBR1 T901 °'a o,q MB 125 22-23 PO.�P oRncrAr Q .. c F s PARKIN PARKING PARKING PARKING ¢ 5 � owr[ur E ALLEY T - '-a- daTcrAr -P' so-P ........... .... ... ra i. . ... .... ... ...... Ta. in.-t y 3m� m - i i �, o $ E m 'p 915 p s ¢�� TI o _ O n y WATER g51RK:T PRGPERttEp p,�yEpx .+. TYb:EWAv P O` �f w- xY cr rY iL 22 ( E TR `71 f ��••r I WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY TR 15 IE W MB 103 7 79 MB 3 78-8 M1� II TR 15783 R��rAr MB 289 31 -35 Autr wXIOlIa1w AFIprN RAn ,,,.,w CITU OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Fp 25'-0' 25'-0' 1_6 30'-0' 30'-0' 6—9' 32—D" 32'-0 12'-0'+ SITL RAN T .. +. ..... •} .. - ..�. .. �.. .. .. .. 1.. + AOO11F55:7.90 PLAN MEET, . .+7'-0+. ja'-A .+ ...ie'-o' +7'-0+ .++4 6'-e+_. . +. .]a'-o'. �{I'-6t�+.f.T�-6. �' �- f RANCNocuuNmw•,a ®J�` DRC2013-00284 A SUBTT18028 e•Ti. r v a•Ts. r v. '.12'C.F. 12'C.F.; RwmL _ n.uu mr•"•¢sr'ar¢u are t. � As Torr 0.0 rn �.q:m m� �s w erar Irwp � Warx ro. ARROYO VISTA AVE.SECTION"L" CALLE DEL PRADO SECTION"M" CARNELIAN STREET TYPICAL SECTION NR sudor xv ..... .. .. .. .. ... Ia scAi[-s. m .. .... .. NO SME.I•,as ... ... .......... .. UNDER THE SUPERNS cs..n 'aoo'°'I S'AA wia�neem ID YW)�Ac4 l>tW sz-wn r 1 General Notes CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - TRACT MAP NO. 18928 1. AR work shall be done In accordance with these plans,the City of Randa Cucamonga Standards and the Standards for Sped flcatlons far Pub11c Works Construction-current editiory IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA1dONGA uRluding Its annual supplements of, amendments.Contractor shall be(amlllar With and shall COUNTY OF SAN BSRNARDDYO be responsible for adhertmca to Utesa scanderds and specifications. STATE F CALIFORNIA 2. All pipelines or substnctures of any kind,telephone or power pales,water meters,valves, 1 fire hydrants,etc.,shown or not shown on these plans within the right-of-way limits or In MOOta ABOMATtOUS wEavnow adjacent am 9 where Improvement work Is to be done shat be removed,replaced, —.-- G. — relocated or protected In place as required at no cost d the Gly d Raerho Cucamonga. —..—._ K Ilne _ naw aionc'at•war 3. Any contractor performing work on this project shall famIllartm himself with the site and shall ! Frapat,lbw at GIPS Alb be solely responsible for any damage to existing facilities resisting directly or Indirectly from � P.1. PdR or be.—Wn his operations,whether or not such fadDtles arc shown on ti1la0 plans. __-- East.C a G books Cb am Bain COG Naw Oub and falltQ 9. A permit shall be ablakhed from the Gq d Rancho Cucamonga Public Works,Erglneelrhg ---- EEC G N—C b.N Qr Department prior to any encroachment or construction within any Gly of Randa s w xa.SM-0, easement or right-o%way micsFlaaPar �0 S. All grade stakes shall be set by the Contractor or Engineer.Paving stakes shall be sec at all DA Naw IMMs ED hinge points,edge d pavement points within 0.01 fed d sub-Wade elevationvm elevation and at not A.C.pt Asphalt Comics rawmaa none than 50 fad Intervals.Additional paving stakes may be required by City Engineer as heeded at warped or vertical curve areas. /"- A.C.CA Aspbwt edit sin Fla _ 0.C.P. •aebdwcedC w*Pi e 6. All sewer,water,to paving gas,prime or other utility laterals,mains,a aossnnps chat be ----— ACP. •AWekes Ge^a l cape uuu adnSLnhrted prior to paving. CM.P.A •mrrh•aW NeW No.w Ards C.I.P. •6a ken PIN 7. Compaction tests of embankment construction,trench backfill,compacting original ground IRR. •inpaeph and as sub9rades shall be performed at M cost to the Gty of Poncho Cucamonga.A &111 , •Anyprybps emaeleu stymiN, a�a� written report with these compaction tests shall be submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to the placement of base materials Md/or surfacing. „�.-- ST. Sd PVyh•crawlee AN.saw 8. At the completion of paving;a materials report shall be submitted to the City Engineer, W. •yrww Nlah Schi d Listing all tests or deterininatlons completed to verify stability all content and gradation of �• S.D. -seam orakh asphalt paving. a. SIG.CONS. Se"A O.,&A 9. Prior g all tests or et arty paving,a materials report shall al e,sieve a al the Cityand Engineer. — " G. G. o Llstilg all tests or determinations sxhmpkhd m verity:R-Value,sieve analysls and nand •• s. •sanaew S— equivalent equivalent d aggregate base. 0... 9.P. nPipe e 'tor O.. R. weer 10. be O 3 Paving shall performed In accordance with ID Wsl. wetw H— determine R-Value and Pavement Tetaken determine stru ti ral sections. eO m 11.whim 1 ® GA. rw Ndw .n mpmvemenh are to be placed an native call,which Consist d rocky materials.the --+mac— W.V. WWxr vd. sub-grade shall be prr!parad by removing a0 cocks which prdrude above the sub-grade and --.�-�— C EYmrr>f AJ all rotive sSON End Endlal.depressions shall be Filed with a fine grade materiel with a quality better than the • aw tela (IdaIla asCOWNe e Nano n AJ 12. If the asphalt conwete Is to be placed on sub-grade,a sds sterilant registered by E.P.A. �— Emwkg Fa f1da•fy use axe Nwhww) 14 for use under&C.and P.GC shall be uniformly applied at the manufactumes .- N.N. 9a gem NNN dwD a� recomen0ed rate for the full pavement width prior to paving. O FA. Hydrw*R.MybMl 13.Estimate of gwntltles is provided by the Engineer Doty for the convenknce of the developer, Px Pole Andwr the contractor shag make his own determination d construction quantities before submitting _ _ T. T kph— PRO]ECT SITE Vicinity Map m e bid.Any Iteofwork required by these pans, lwhish Is not nspedflolly,listed In the �—r—. estimate of quantltIM shag be considered as Included In the other Ren of wok. �„�• Emntlhhp Su—tLigmard 1 In:1000 R. OwN66 8 D6VP10PBR: 14. Street signs per City of Randa Cucamonga Standard Number 401 shall be constructed at N—snpw Sawwd moi, each Intersection. ® E,dw,g mMNM 11a�w.ARAOW 101.NTWAG911T7 r, Pa. Fxaerhp Pule" 15.City approval ss pians don fid during the developer from request for the a correction d Q P.O. Naw Pus ass INDEX OF DRAWINGS! error and omission discovered during hnrhstructlon.Upon request the required plan revisions shall be promptly submitted to the City Engineer for approval. New sign as COVER wear,EGTewhs Novas,MCIOUTTN"S"d GRADING!IBM tw. •-E OwRP1VAL GRADDN a ORAi14iE PEAR COtl1111rCr10N NOTb9. 16.Work she and exterior streets shall be In a neat,dean.hazard free,orderly state throughout —,�— s xanN Slag W O�tuesGR BEC"G& comtrurym.Site shall be leaned upon reghrest d the RtsPactar. a•s PtM=arORRE N PRGVCPLgrl••R NOW WIDENING ® New era!Will APR NO.0207-022-11 17.Contact erg Utility Companies as required,48 hours prolor to Excavation. OR FNftlkhp T a To a Rit—W 0 Em sMN GROf!A92M 44Aes.5S Provided for your convenience are the following: d x Ennis Two m—M(xapl BENCH HARM A.San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District (818)969-7911 'no"Xi Fdebp spot swaden m aIARR RUNm cows Mr.Bob Stallings —ELM— New spot Flnmm. Tam uvoao sna For Base line Road Construction Ox/Na Rwxmary w baylgm WwZIN n F war wsaewa� S.Veritw (800)483.3000 �� ern G Southern California Gas Company (810)427-2200 Residential �- r—uk as a•tr.s msrmms.ees 216 N.Euclid Avenue (600)427-2000 Commercial a NN,IAC wtowEawraw�'ua�i"a,ad deua CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Ontario,CA 91762 New 6hopell:rwGreetw) tbra eaaaw awrWwaanddard afaub rabm. PLAN D.Cucamonga Valley water District (909)987.2591 E.P. Was of Paearea ADDRESS,ED CO CARNELIAN ETGRA IN i, 10440 Ashford Street a.mw.Nsa CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGS CA. Rancho Cucamonga,G 9173D ® Naw WOW yg E.Metropolitan Water District (909)593-7474 ®J�a DRC2019-00524 & SUBTTIO928 700 N.Moreno Avenue gyp Ala EhhU1ENE PYIti ba Verne,CA 91750 REE,RrR11CnRCEs,Eft ARE 9r>Asn1Eb yhmiq m ami. coy"o act LCE aa_ F.AdNphla (800)6266299(Portion of Ileal Hill) E0ID1p°0s m w �s a G.Charts Communication (909)987-6275 6pyt7b8 re war ante I 6680 View Park Court m•naaa. a ceawr• a.e a 1 5 Riverside,CA 92503 raAv vaahar a hNR's7sot n aaErot to fah ee90 uNm illi sIponta N or ow® au.ha aw raz Re ri-I CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - TRACT MAP NO. 18928 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CI.:tA e..pAso COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO �- 4p(ASC a sT.sTl b C2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA — A 4 _.— o' E%6MG oANEretO� 19 bu6uNc ux 9. (C)BILLBMG (E)BIIbpN. 1 b211 * W; . A 39Tb9 a39T.w,IC �g & S y17'-r a ,h/ b b t3iy6]>R $?q �J•p -0,� e��! 4 " ��+ 0 k� y�� p� �oalawN are �� �i 4A Ip 'J p A� # IT ` iiilllrrr G� N S.a.13 SB FT. _ v-r _ LL13•ACRS •tlCm a'.mm yp a��m nMlm �y� n�..tti� ¢-1mm p Aay���p0 ..._ (NI oCCroR.tm2 pwl -§.'� i x-muR R .be n U6:1 If•MmL IF�11 A RyL ---- X61 Q _ — C.3pTc 6 ' Jl1oR P IT T1 C�p1m A' 4 1 a o �p !� t -� - >.° SSR N @g w --- ---------y •.s _ ramno• oZ7 JoLoon smn��•pn �gamn �axma f — } W �a -pay/-10 O (E)euam.c DI) 13 Z R 7Xi" p. - .ta'-o• 'r-r �:r-o• PZ � 9 0 2 • O 56 9 ry To yP0 ' (MI1W NATu Irxol Y�-6 1389.19,1t < <' WATER DISTRICT PROPERTY cosul,R n1 BODiI11M M bepxbEa f)1tII! CrrY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA...we C ib61 Mi Ox 'il[OIM rs m t em[[tU Ne gstCecb Ct Cour PLAN PLANNED CONCEPTUAL GRADING .oma°Nw A>$urml°�"'tNNa enro�ru^�'1°101� ADDRESS 7.90 CARNELIAN STREET, CITY Of RANCHO CUCAMUNGA,CA. GRAPHIC SCAM ®J�` DRC2019-00624 & SUBTT16920 , IP 0 bl® PSu®o el uvl. DT,"rl cer_ (a ESR 1 �„W� r.wa auiiw � elru.Irint) 1 fee► u R ARR8e55 AO!N0. nra 1:lawn AVE.9b1E aE. 2 5 tUAOT tolufr�r0•Irp¢a bmm m(m0 Ilee-� fR®1 tlb:saasnmwl v RTl No. Date rub An CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - TRACT MAP N.O. 18928 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONSTRUCTION NOTES. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATS OF CALIFORNIA 1D CONSTRUCT RAIN WATER GARDEN BMP. SEE G-5 FOR DETAILS it PROVIDE TRANSITION AC BERN TO CONNECT TO(S)CURB AND GUTTER. NOTES _ Q2 CONSTRUCT 247824'AREA CATCH BASIN PER DETAIL B/C-1 REMOVE 12'OF AC BERAL O .CONSTRUCT STORM DRAIN PVC PIPE(SCHED 40)PER TRENCH DETAIL "C%6-3. SIZE&LENGTH PER PLAN. Q CONSTRUCT 6'SANITARY SEINER.CONNECT TO EA750NG LATERAL. NOTE 1.0 DETAILS OTHER SECTIONS AND OTHER INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED ON FINE GRADING PLANS 1© CONSTRUCT 35'MOTH ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY PER CITY OF CUCAMGNGA STD PLAN 101, TYOE C. 20 GROSS LOT AREA: 44,401.59 SQ FT. ® CONSTRUCT CONLRE7E CURB k GUTTER-BARRIER TYPE A3-d PER CITY Of CUCAMONGA STD PIAN fol. O CMU MALL FOUNDATION UNDERPINNING REQUIRED. 10 NET LOT AREA 43.001.59 SO FT O5 CONSTRUCT SCIIFFER PER DETAIL 'E'IG-1 4.0 TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: 44,401.59 SO.FT. © CONSTRUCT 26'AC PAVED DRIVEWAY PER PAVEMENT STRUCTURAL SECTION DETAIL 7'/G-1 LI Q7 CONSTRUCT ROILED CONCRETE CURB PER CITY OF CUCAMONGA SID PLAN 105-A EARTHWORK QUANTITIES., 1` ® CONSTRUCT CONCRETE PAVING PER SECTION DETAIL f/C-3 FOR PARRRNC t O9 PROTECT NR PUCE EIOSTIVOLUME CUT 200 CU YDS it CMU WALL VOLUME FILL 200 CU. YDS PROVIDE REMOVE fIRANOFON AC BCRN.AC BERM TO CONNECT TO:(N)CURB AND GUTTER Al BCR4. . 435/I. 'SAN BEFNARO@IB FLOOD 430 It. CONTROL afAWR PLANTER AREAVAROS VARIES h � IANDSGIPE AREA � ITS!f. (p OPEN CROIR�O MUI LAWAREA PLAY AREA <i V IES 5 MARES 45•_1• - 420!1. 1 415(L TI aoounK OF-104.50CONCREi 410!t. BEIM N CF-401.00 TT=403.00 405 It. =402ILIO If. BACKFILL BACKED! 7 (XFAL 395 It. BA .: SOILS REPORT SOLS REPORT SOILS ROVIRT BAULTHL 390!t. O SOLS MT LS i BALr(TAL SORUWr TYPICAL.SECTION "Q" SCALD 1' 10' 435!L 450 n. 425 It. NR AqA �EVX LTO!t. I {3.C." •_trilElolr IT CAR,AW a4WARDAr-0BAAW i 4r5 a FL+ :Y-'•0• r tF r #4' 410 rL n4fO1Vr19Nw4WWp1 •trn �,� �ASNEr Pw a rc LvoEu 4011. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �! Fl 400 O. PLAN PLANNED CaK tW mRAmE amt L 39511. ADDRESS,7470 ARNEL AL GRADING RAN STREET, IFI cm A'ALL� ABItID 04Of aria BABIrAL POt CITYof RANCHO axANDl4w,ca 9�sAoorr 390 R. dF DRC2013-00824 & SUB'1T18928 TYPICAL SECTION "P" �". AOOAES SCALE: 1' I 10' rnt��vm ar Aiau7wz°�'ty 4'dem 3 p 6 .rki 710 9aa-4em LOM THE SAWrAmm oF xcr.xo. 4 CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - TRACT MAP NO. 18928 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 435/t. i 430 It. u W 175/f. _ Ei BW(QIN�j &1970 If. RWl{IINj 415 It. CEMENT CONCRETE ATE (IYENr cimwr 410 n. CONO'tFTF � Ladw Or=901.50 (l=101.50 OF=4DI.GO rF=401.00 C019CREIE 40.5/t. FF=90050 .R3 GF=4(10.00 Fl.40000 fF=J99.50 !(=399.50 .BJ 4017/t. 395 ll. frAO(fRl SOILS REPORT OA(JODE PE RAGODL 390 rl. 5015 REPORr SOPS CS F43CRT CKFU SAREP�G4T BAfMlgL PE SOILS REPORT TYPICAL SECTION FFQFF SCALE- Y 10' r+ (D 3 m T 435 N. N 450 R. ry 475 Il. 170 ft' ,T eu0nc OFDP F T TT 25'-0'4/- rx'd +J�. 3Y-o' SY-D• 110 ff. cOO/r LWtR 1 N• sTI'k T-!T r7 0' p'^599.00 U�l99W OOlIM4RN . i9a400 C —� • J95 SVElIA1K sAOM J90 2 sDFs 9FwFr ..TYPICAL SECTION FFQFF SCALE, 1' 10' CM OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLAN PLANNED CONCEPTUAL GRADING A00RESS7190 CARNELIAN STREET, CITY OF RANCHO CUCANONGA,CA. DRC2013-00824 h SUBTT18928 .14-iF' m.w�. AFrFIOYFon �rz _ ary FMGtbfA <.!Ib. pmt "` �' ewslFWFt RFAE NO. nr»s vmwtr Avc sFFa aFFmm —4 4 n 5 .u.a�FaFsr s FswA¢n IEL ]IO Mtf� UmFp IIIE SOFF/M9011 6 ACF.N0. pF� nrz rAe Fq 4-Y I I 1. CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN - TRACT MAP NO. 18928 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS- 9-FOOT WIDENING 'i a EXISTING DRIVEWAY 0 1 N :;39_9. 1 wr M. �� v m m FI 17' AID m n o �. cl N — Jg w 6�9 J V .D I• A �p�j (_J A Q Q I• [lb --1 -� O r Cl (E)LANDSCAPE N (E)LANDSCAPE (E)LANDSCAPE (E)CONCRETE 1 1 (E)CONCRETE SIDEWALK p ItE TC SIDEWALK (E)CONCRETESIDEWALK O 20 (E)FlRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN AND PROTECTED IN PLACE. ?8 CONSTRUCT CURBSIDE DRAIN OUTLET,LOW CAPACITY PER OTT'OF CUCAMONGA STD PLAN No. 107-A 21 PROVIDE ONE(1)9500 LUMENS HPSV STREET LIGHT.OBUIN OTY APPROVAL FOR FOR LOCATION. ® CQNSTRUCT O/RBSIDE OWN-OUTLET,MEDIUWCAPACIIY,PER CITY OF CUCAMONGA STD PLAN.NO 107-8. TNWnID•noNVTWnaoW .DAn �,�„� 2? PROVRIE TRAFFIC STRIPING AND'SIGNAGE. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2J PRONDE IRANSITION AC BERM TO CONNECT TO(N)CURB AND G TWJ?AT BCR. PLAN REMOVE 14.5'OF(E)AC BERN. r ADORESAS�%70 CCARNADING ELIAN STREET, 24 CONSTRUCT CONCRETE CURB&CUTTER-BARRIER, TYPE AJ-B PER CITY OF CUCAMONGA STD PUN 104.. cITY OF RANCHO CLICAKWA,CA. DRAPTac m.... DRC2018-00824 & SUBT'l'18928 25 MOVE MAIL BOX TO IRIS LOCATION. o® Ew.WW; (d Tom) pOAW[S 0. Taal TNIIN) 26 RELOCATE WATER METER.COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY. ''m°0' 1O s iml e.twn .u,. oe wAz w2.11 L lax-O&M 5 5. 27 RELOCATE STREET SM. Trn nTe T,a r-J , SITE & DRAINAGE PLAN IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINIO STATE OF CALIFORNIA ® o Na oamR�Iw flulml m w w.rw+v...1 .N 1 :<en I •� �•�••m• A3e33runmla w.wm m rs rioa YNAaa a..wrl lourt �� GIM 9Aae ,� ..ree0p.�wr rr I®n t rwrm m Ym to arr lw.Yi — _ua4 Iw l4 soa W NAar • o r rzarw o Tw n.mea los s..rw�i m n. u -l�eAw w a miti Ilr.reis v aaen.w wesnuNlon l,�•`-`i �+m�o�oana mn"'rumvmo Y eu,n:.ce 1 ow IY A .n..+ y :f•:?'�•�.r•:��.F.}, .m n Y.rsani w e r.a m m w r J n.wom rm nano • �.ly. t iaw 1 mrmN Wmlw>m wl R o[u W4�w�Y�,�INa it R 16L wlIIrm�Nwwen M-IR TnlMrt rw.n u LL1Yrm1 YR A.p p—WaalrlY �O CBAF�3016 a.•Na ry liw ra � !4 4 Pp lam mM1iuvc i iaao m awn E iaala ua 4 u...orr r•iw. l-1 rr�Kaa nm1Aw IT-lwlYr Yq �.--.� Idrw roe®rtaacx ruvr l w s IT:.ry a Ila aDllw Ifw41aE ILtw rwaz l m w Ny w IY r curt ®© Yana wv IwYI w wtw EmvAwn •M No 1. R IW Ar wr mi ±�ra ruY:mma ,Aft .iou mm.o r m a.a w..m m a ra wru Q Yw maal a��� •b A i W LartA rYR BIOFILTRATION SECTION N.T.S. laaA alar TR 9016 W; o MB 125 22-23 NZONING: M TR 71'23 W 3 MB 103 78 79 m ZONING: F -d fj Q n Kj V : »zoom r T-0• zJ-o w'-O• D.� ��a o m VICINITY MAP b i RI Ci Ai R iaN col inln f•.l.arrt �� AREA= 22, S0. FT _ N ;p° , b ��a k a w z owaca b wl eml �+�N nqR®:vyr.imnitrr_nnanl.owoyrwwm TORIRwauawfl YW aAYa Ai Ai Ai Ai Ai Ai aue� F A 3 1 1 'S TO FAt AREA= 40,083 S0. FT ` INDEX OF DDAN1IN05: L caiw YnT.aam.l ao,v irml„rrw. 4 �: R:lwmaml ^• R.'wmu realm o ^-souo �:'�$ Ir>•.ol.m or..mm N.aau a.zriw ^.mao a�mam A _ rr-rmv N.0a1 �: i� w..tmu ro. NE.aIssT -xm § - b p i p i JaN Fs� APN NO.0207-012-11 i�a A .i�' 3p wa.aAeA.....au. ai b ' pi --T AREA= 17,997 SQ�I FT p p 6 P— =e BENCHMARK: A Ai 1 pi J sAr b aalorNaAS Yaws aawa alma p � � � w AaatlNrrpNEYEY Mt nA Ai •• A - A .as Im•r on�NmaaiAam Yams awma yama r.Yrr:we.rw...-lair TR ar zs rs��r is s-ro r.lc �ro r waaaa sr[ ri-er ares o.lo• ew r r raw.+.. MB 103378-79 TR 15783 ye maoecrrataAml Aru uillEe wuas MB 289 31-35 lawaAi•-rNzswss zs-s � aa'-s ,e:'-o•, . .. , ZONING: FC ZONING: M a SITE & DRAINAGE PLAN *GYP BHP A3-BU9.T CBR'fMCATE �R 1 IcaEar cEarur IIYr rlc IacczsAar Yew fYAEar IWlArilEllr PLAx tc@PAM` DRC2013-00824 & SUBTT16928 awlArilENl PRA[rl[E DEVIC[S IYK RQI mrlIIrlU[rE0 WDFA Mr IIw[AVIIIa"sr wD YIC i1M[1D7YL 10 ilE BEIIT Q MY CIDVI(ptt K tr r1E DATE YD.aV. p1.�t�� W1N.Ir •....•`.�•..fIs I . Sl[fYTIIIS DATE > 1 wReur ."111. Tlra 1 lase^AR.,MII n WAR nlalYll S IOwANIIt 4� 1 1 1E1 SID Mtf evil lalDln>s SWOMO w W W-1 'x{ RP- 1 • room planning group, Inc. J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J YOU ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING! AI/rA/A/A/01/rA/A/00"00"OW4V*00"00000000me"V*M/r/rA1/rAl • PURPOSE: To let you know about a new residential development being planned in your area &to solicit your comments • YOUR HOST: Mr.Alex Mustapha, Project Applicant • DATEf TIME: DECEMBER 12, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. • PLACE: THE HERITAGE IMV 8179 Spruce Street, Rancho Cucamonga In the "HERITAGE ROOM" PROJECT DESCRIPTION:A request to subdivide approximately 1.02 acres of land located a 7490 Carnelian Street to allow the construction of eight(8) two story single family homes at a density of 8 units per acre, as permitted by the current zoning and land use designations. The subject property is currently occupied by one older single family structure, which would be demolished. PROJECT CASE INFORMATION: Environmental Assessment and Design Review DRC2013-00824; Tentative Tract Map #SUBTT18928;Assessor's Parcel Map Number (APN) 0207-022-1 1 PROJECT APPLICANT AND INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.Alex Mustapha; 536 West Arrow Highway, SUITE 201, Covina, CA. 91722; TEL: 626/859-0222. -PROJECT& HOTEL LOCATION MAPS ON REVERSE- EXHIBIT B Item EFG28 i ® THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA C;CHUUMONGAJUNE 179 2014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California SYTs'c ..7 k*rsr^^:ay,.` - ..:'4.•'t�•... =y,ry r+-'_Y' r nxf,:;:: f.�,;., x.. •.�=��_w y :x';- �:"+ ACTIO= ..•'•xY.�.. .:. Roll Call 7.00 p.m. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Frances Howdyshell_ • Lou Munoz— NINE+rr .m`.-ky:,• �.y�.., .- . .�-.�c.�w...µ> ,sem• 4r�.x, •. .`�., , M. r {. w n �. a :' AN The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP A. The project was not SUBTT18928 –ALEX MUSTAPHA-A request to create a Tract Map for approved. Revisions an 8-unit townhouse development for a 1.02-acre site within the Medium are needed and return Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street-APN: 0207-022-11. to DRC. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332(In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related files: Design Review DRC2013-00824 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. • EXHIBIT C 1of2 Item EFG30 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA xo June 17, 2014 CUCAMCWCK B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW B. The project was DRC2013-00824 — ALEX MUSTAPHA - Design review for an 8-unit not approved. townhouse development on 1.02 acre within the Medium Residential Revisions are needed District located at 7490 Camelian Street-APN: 0207-022-11.This project and return to DRC is categorically exempt per Section 15332(In-Fill Development Projects)of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. Related files: SUBTT18928 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. C. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00825 - ALEX MUSTAPHA - A C. The project was request to remove 26 trees related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 not approved. and Design Review DRC2013-00824 for a 1.02-acre site within the Revisions are needed Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - and return to DRC APN: 0207-022-11. D. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00305-BRAD BULLER FOR D. The project was TERRA VISTA TOWN CENTER -A review of a proposed change to the approved. The color scheme/theme of an existing commercial complex of about applicant will need an 63.6 acres within the Community Commercial (CC) District, Terra Vista inspection on a test reaCommunity Plan, located at the north side of Foothill Boulevard between then fi al enr colors) approval by Haven Avenue and Spruce Avenue-APNs: 1077-422-10, -11, -17, -60, - Planning Manager 62, -66 through -69, and -79 through -92 and/or DRC on the color before applying to the rest of the building(s). s w:r';tr."' rY rr-r"+' X�' w.us:.as.:m:- .'r: :x4ix:;:- .*cm x-.""r •+rgr,• :may;:,as•.«r;y�y.. ::...;r':"°.•9�+�`..r,`W. �•;'`.fir`= iw��:. .fix � _ r..,r.` xa✓F' �'': [r :�. ` � ....' yq� None. � ,....mti' 'cTfi.C�i.1...:,1s"��. .: ^.iiZ ' This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. a`l'•'#<l..e.,, ,,.. '{; ,.,+'Y:�r`da ; .: •R. .-:�_. ,Se?•=,a.m.£aa3_ _...;` .t:^,• ;c. ':nd'.".tf, s:- ,�. �•^s •: Ut'3fr.wr. '`r:7a'r^d?T fe.z; sy c��r.:'. 44 �.kfi;•- ; w:a."AD, .:: s-•r = : 8:03 p.m. rise,„"y_.::..,:.. i`..;v a' '. S..r:`% ?....... B✓ .Y .,r.-:. •. .`ir+....' ^%''.7'::.5-vw:_.E<Y.".:..•.r;. ,1;; .,aT,:`.:.. The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time,they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2of2 Item EFG31 • THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA CoN� SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California Lai; F� ,yz�.>;Ir.;�,� .,.9,.,'gty..."FT,'oi'..y�sg-•rn ;r.:,�tr'•Sw'.. _- ;.r,s. ;,,,a». a� u. /�T�^� ��..!'�s.Ya�' ,,.:'y♦�' "ii.4 "'S�:,y, .. �}'�. •}e/'. 'r: ^.N .:.T �i" ,r(: f'�• ri.'�Y '-`"� '" .. �' .i 31T ••{ �^•rr`. `Riw. s . w _ ate?= ;� - ACTION Roll Call 7:00 p.m. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett._ Donald Granger X • Alternates: Ray Wimberly— Frances Howdyshell_ Lou Munoz %En IN The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928-ALEX MUSTAPHA-A request to A. Approved. create a Tract Map for an 8-unit townhouse development for a 1.02-acre site within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Camelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects)of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations –APN: 020-702-211. Related cases: Design Review DRC2013-00824 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825. • 1 of 2 Item EFG32 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA SEPTEMBER 2, 2014 Ct°cd+ B. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824-ALEX MUSTAPHA-Design review B.Approved. for an 8-unit townhouse development on 1.02-acre of land within the Medium Residential District, located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in -fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations- APN: 020702211. Related cases: Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928. C. SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2013-00896—AC KAUSHAL- Site C.Applicant not plan and architectural review of a 1,659 square foot single-family present—the item residence with a 506 square foot garage on a 3,358 square foot lot on the was moved to the east side of Center Avenue and south of 24th Street within the Low (L) September 30, 2014, Residential Development District, located at 8855 Center Avenue - DRC meeting. APN: 0209-123-05. Related case: Variance DRC2013-00897. D. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT1 8961 -TRACY RASZEWSKI FOR HOIKE,LLC D. Approved. -A request to subdivide one existing 4.75-acre parcel into 7 parcels within the Equestrian Overlay of the Very Low(VL)Residential Zoning District,located at the northeast corner of Sapphire Street and Brittany Lane at 5615 Sapphire Street- APN: 1061-691-04. This project is categorically exempt per Section 15332(In-Fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act and the City CEQA Guidelines. It is a Class 32 categorical exemption because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. NO x: rj — ; M .GjjJ E ( None. ::.�»�i+-e._ .`:.�`i ..r......,..,..ro:.' !;: ,.+: This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual k ._. ' ''�.$���`.v"e�^:�F',�is.+:te:rfiS:q's•Y;�.l:iY;✓::n:.:.-:+s��"T^.^ ,;q�• 1. e:vc.".n.�.ry ',£. .,. u,. ' .t "zi'.';. i..:u'�l..u`".•..�':.•'.3� � -». mak• 'y3•- ..`.�, :y P.M. Vit:}...:,,._ ...-,.:..�...:.-�..y��,:.;%-.:::.�,�..a.. �a��.:.= 6x :a��.:sa..: The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m.adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 2. of2 Item EFG33 RESOLUTION NO. 14-46 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 1.02-ACRE PARCEL FOR AN 8-UNIT TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (M) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 7490 CARNELIAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-022-11. A. Recitals. 1. Alex Mustapha filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of October 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said public hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 8, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 1.02-acre parcel located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11; and b. The abutting properties to the north of the subject site contain single-family residential and townhomes which are located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the east, across Carnelian Street, consist of single-family residential that are located within the Low (L) Residential District; the properties to the south, consist of single-family residential and a water tank located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the west, contains a flood channel located within the Flood Control (FC) District; and C. The applicant proposes to subdivide the subject 1.02-acre parcel into 8 individual lots for the purposes of constructing an 8-unit townhouse development. Each parcel is approximately 2,613 square feet. The driveway/fire lane area totals 13,368 square feet, and the open space area totals 7,631 square feet; and d. The proposed subdivision is being e ng requested in conjunction with the development of eight (8)townhouse units totaling 14,544 square feet. Item EFG34 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-46 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928—ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 2 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed tentative parcel map is in conjunction with a proposal to construct eight (8) townhouse units totaling 14,544 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is Medium Residential; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code because the lots being created meet the minimum parcel dimensions and size requirements; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed as the subject property is currently developed with a single-family residence and does not have any geographical constraints. The property generally slopes from north to south and is surrounded by existing residential development to the north, south, and east. To the west is a flood channel; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The design of the site is in compliance with the General Plan and Development Code requirements and is consistent with neighboring existing residential developments; and e. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The studies prepared for this project, which includes, but is not limited to an analysis of air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, and noise, indicated that the proposed development will not create significant impacts that might cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record,for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The project involves the completion of frontage improvements(Carnelian Street)that will be used for vehicular access to the site. These off-site improvements as well as all on-site improvements are consistent with the surrounding development. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Item EFG35 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-46 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928—ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ® NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item EFG36 Conditions of.Approval • OiJANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. • 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Notice of Exemption-$50 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 18928 is granted subject to the approval of Design Review DRC2013-00824. 6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. • Printed:9/30/2014 www.QtyofRC.us Item EFG37 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 8. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 11. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. 12. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 13. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 14. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 15. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 16. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 17. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Manager, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum-around space in front .of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public.right-of-way. 18. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 19. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. Printed:9!30!2014 www.cityofRc.us Page 2 of 16 item EFG38 Project#: SUBTT10928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 ® Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Plannina Department 20. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 21. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 22. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD)Standards. 23. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 24. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape • maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 25. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 26. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 27. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 28. For multiple-family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 29. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 30. For single-family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two 1/2-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 31. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. • Printed:9/30/2014 www.QtyotRC.us Page 3 of 16 Item EFG39 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: A. Planning Department 32. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 33. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final. map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 34. A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project 0 percent - 48-inch box or larger, 10 percent - 36-inch box or larger, 10 percent - 24- inch box or larger, 80 percent- 15-gallon. 35. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 36. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 37. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 38. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborists recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 39. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 40. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. www.CityofRC.us Printed:9/30/2014 Page 4 of 18 Item EFG40 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Deaartment 41. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 42. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 43. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 44. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 45. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building Official • review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 46. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 47. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building and Safety Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 48. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Manager, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 49. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 50. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. • Printed:9/30/2014 www.CByofRC.us Page 5 of 16 Item EFG41 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 51. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 52. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 53. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a .solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. 54. The Covenants, Conditions., and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 55. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 56. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 57. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 58. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 59. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant. 60. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 61. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www.cityofRc.us Printed:9/30/2014 Page 6 of 16 Item EFG42 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. ROJECT.A. Planninct Department 62. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 63. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall submit to the City applicable recorded documentation that establishes, and/or ensures the continuation of, agreements, easements, etc. for the purpose of mutual/reciprocal use, access, parking, and maintenance. Statements noting these agreements, easements, etc. shall be included on the Final Map. 64. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 65. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 66. All garage doors shall have decorative windows that match the theme of the corresponding house. 67. Approval is for the subdivision of a 1.02 acre parcel into eight (8) individual lots for the purposes of constructing an 8-unit townhouse development within the Medium Residential District located at 7490 Carnelian Street-APN: 0207-022-11. 68. The development shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Medium Residential District as described in the Development Code. 69. All building construction shall be in accordance with the following Acoustical Analysis that was prepared and submitted to the Planning Department on December 9, 2013: a. Add STC 24 glazing to the Unit 2 Kitchen b. Add STC 28 glazing to the Unit 1 Living Room, Dining Room and Bedroom 3 (west side bedroom) c. Add STC 34 glazing to the Unit 1 Kitchen, Master Bedroom and Bedroom 2 (east side bedroom) The above glazing upgrade shall apply to all windows and doors in the specified room regardless of whether they face Carnelian Street or not. 70. Provide Unit-to-Unit noise control on building construction plans as noted in the Acoustical • Analysis. Printed:9/30/2014 Www.C40MC.us Page 7 of 16 Item EFG43 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., B. Engineering Services Deuartment 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Carnelian Street Curb&Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Curbside drain outlet 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case .shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 4. Install double yellow striping and a stop sign on-site. 5. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Carnelian Street shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of project frontage on Carnelian Street. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will.be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. Printed:9/30/2014 www.cityofRc.us Page 8 of 16 Item EFG44 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- B. ROJECT.B. Engineering Services Department 8. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 9. Street improvement plans shall be designed for the full length of the project frontage. If during plan check it becomes apparent that installing portions of the ultimate improvements will be infeasible due to conflicts with existing improvements to the north and/or south, install as much of the improvements as possible and deposit a cash contribution in lieu of construction for the balance. Said contribution shall include removal of interim improvements and completion of grading for both street and parkway improvements. Contribution in lieu of construction shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 10. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): • 44 total feet on Camelian Street 11. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 12. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 13. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 14. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. • Printed:9/30/2014 www.QtyofRC.us Page 9 of 16 Item EFG45 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. En4ineerina Services Department 17. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 18. Camelian Street frontage shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Provide curb and gutter, street trees, commercial drive approach, curbside drain outlets and sidewalk, as required. b. Provide one(1)9500 Lumens HPSV street light. c. Protect or provide traffic striping and signage, as required. d. Drive approach to be in accordance with the City Std. Dwg. 101,Type C. 19. Transitions to existing curb and gutter on the north and south project boundaries shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Printed:9/30/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 16 item EFG46 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. En-gineering Services Department 20. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Camelian Street Botanical Name-Magnolia grandiflora"St. Mary" Common Name-NCN Min. Grow Space-3' Spacing -20' 0.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. • 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 21. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be bome by the developer. 22. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. C. Fire Prevention/ New Construction Unit 1. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing, pavement marking and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for review and approval. 2. Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access — Fire Lanes Standard and the current edition of California Fire Code for specific requirements. 3. Knox Rapid Entry System: are required in accordance to the RCFPD Residential Vehicular Gate • Standard and the RCFPD Knox Box Installation Standard. Printed:9/30/2014 www.QtyofRC.us Page 11 of 16 Item EFG47 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. C. Fire Prevention/ New Construction Unit 4. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard#5-3. 5. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 6. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial and multi-family buildings shall post the building addresses, address monuments, site directories, directional signage and suite designations in accordance to RCFPD Multi-Family Residential Addressing Standard. 7. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The .applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 8. Construction Access and Fire Protection Water Supply: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. Please refer to the RCFPD Standards# 14-1 & 14-2 for the requirements specific to fire protection water supply and fire department access during construction. 9. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 10. Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction. Services. 11. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8'h" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. Printed:9/30/2014 www.cityofRc.us Page 12 of 16 Item EFG48 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- C. ROJECT:C. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit 13. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 14. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 15. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system (in accordance with RCFPD Standard) must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. Include a copy of the approved underground plans as reference with the overhead submittal. 16. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial and multi-family buildings shall post the building addresses, address monuments, site directories, directional signage and suite designations in accordance to RCFPD Multi-Family Residential Addressing Standard. 17. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 18. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 19. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 Y2' x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan • must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. Printed:9/30/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 16 Item EFG49 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., E. Gradina Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared. by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies wil be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 7. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 8. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections. prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly.wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. Printed:9/30/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 18 Item EFG50 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 11. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 12. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 13. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CCBR's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CCBR's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 14. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 15. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for • review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 16. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 17. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 20. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 21. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 22. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. • 23. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. Printed:9/30/2014 www-QtyofRC.us Page 15 of 16 Item EFG51 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Gradina Section 24. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 25. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorders Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a' Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 28. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Camelian Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for all storm water quality management plan structural treatment devices to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property(i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 31. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 32. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales.where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 33. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. Printed:9/30/2014 www.cityofRc.us Page 16 of 16 Item EFG52 RESOLUTION NO. 14-47 ® A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824, A REVIEW OF A PROPOSAL FOR 8 TOWNHOMES IN CONJUNCTION WITH TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928, A SUBDIVISION OF 1.02 ACRE WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 7490 CARNELIAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 0207-022-11. A. Recitals. 1. Alex Mustapha filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2013-00824, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of October 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: • 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 8, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 1.02-acre parcel located at 7490 Carnelian Street - APN: 0207-022-11; and b. The project site has an overall area of approximately 44,431 square feet (1.02 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 100 feet in width by approximately 431-441 feet in length; and C. The property to the north of the subject site contains single-family residential and townhomes that are located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the east, across Carnelian Street, consist of single-family residential that are located within the Low (L) Residential District; the properties to the south, consist of single-family residential and a water tank located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the west, contain a flood channel located within the Flood Control (FC) District; and d. The zoning of the property is within the Medium (M) Residential District; and • e. The proposal is to construct an 8-unit townhouse development in conjunction with an 8-lot subdivision (Related case: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928) ; and Item EFG53 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-47 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824—ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 2 f. The applicant proposes four(4)footprints—Models A, B, C, and D—Models A and C are similar with differing roof planes,and Models B and D are similar with differing roof planes.All models with be two-story; and g. . The proposed houses will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in the Development Code, such as Section 17.120.030 of the Development Code that requires architectural treatment to all elevations (e.g., 360-degree architecture). The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct an 8-unit townhouse development in conjunction with an 8-lot subdivision(Related case: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928. The underlying General Plan designation is Medium Residential. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is currently developed with single-family residential; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all the surrounding properties are Medium (M) Residential, Low(L) Residential., and Flood Control (FC) Districts. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Item EFG54 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-47 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824—ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 3 • 6. The Secreta ryto this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ® ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item EFG55 Conditions of Approval • CHO !. UCAMO,GA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- A. Planning Department 1. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all recommendations of the acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of interior and exterior noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy release of the affected homes. 2. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. • 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission hearing. Notice of Exemption-$50 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 18928 is granted subject to the approval of Design Review DRC2013-00824. 6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program - The owner shall cause the manager and any resident manager to complete the training for and enroll the project in the San Bernardino County Crime Free Multi-Family Housing Program. • Printed:9/30/2014 www.CityofRC.us Item EFG56 Project#: SUBTTIS928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 8. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Manager and Police Department (477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 11. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. 12. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of 'Building Permits. 13. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 14. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 15. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 16. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 17. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Manager, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate tum-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 18. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 19. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking areas. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 16 Printed:9/30/2014 Item EFG57 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., A. Planning Department 20. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 21. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 22. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department(RCFD)Standards. 23. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 24. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape • maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 25. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 26. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 27. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 28. For multiple-family development, laundry facilities shall be provided as required by the Development Code. 29. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 30. For single-family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two 1/2-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 31. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. Printed:9/30/2014 www•Cityo}RC.us Page 3 of 16 Item EFG58 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., A. Planning Department 32. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 33. A detailed landscape and- irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 34. A minimum of 45 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shall be provided within the project: 0 percent - 48-inch box or larger, 10 percent - 36-inch box or larger, 10 percent - 24- inch box or larger, 80 percent- 15-gallon. 35. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 36. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 37. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 38. Existing trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Development Code Section 17.80.050, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape plans. The applicant shall follow all of the arborist's recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting, and trimming methods. 39. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 40. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. Printed:9/30/2014 www.cityofRc.us Page 4 of 16 Item EFG59 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit I ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 41. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 42. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 43. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department 44. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 45. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building Official • review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 46. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 47. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowner's Association shall be submitted for Planning Manager and Building and Safety Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 48. On comer side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Manager, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 49. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. 50. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. • Printed:9/30/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 16 Item EFG60 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 51. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 52. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 53. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. 54. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a List of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 55. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Manager and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 56. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 57. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Manager review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 58. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 59. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or water sealant 60. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 61. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www.CityafRC.us Pages of 16 Printed:9/30/2014 Item EFG61 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. A. Planning Department 62. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 63. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the applicant shall submit to the City applicable recorded documentation that establishes, and/or ensures the continuation of, agreements, easements, etc. for the purpose of mutual/reciprocal use, access, parking, and maintenance. Statements noting these agreements, easements, etc. shall be included on the Final Map. 64. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with any sections of the Development Code, State Fire Marshal's regulations, Uniform Building Code, or any other City Ordinances. 65. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Manager. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which • exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 66. All garage doors shall have decorative windows that match the theme of the corresponding house. 67. Approval is for the subdivision of a 1.02 acre parcel into eight (8) individual lots for the purposes of constructing an 8-unit townhouse development within the Medium Residential District located at 7490 Carnelian Street-APN: 0207-022-11. 68. The development shall be in accordance with the standards and requirements applicable to the Medium Residential District as described in the Development Code. 69. All building construction shall be in accordance with the following Acoustical Analysis that was prepared and submitted to the Planning Department on December 9, 2013: a. Add STC 24 glazing to the Unit 2 Kitchen b. Add STC 28 glazing to the Unit 1 Living Room, Dining Room and Bedroom 3(west side bedroom) c. Add STC 34 glazing to the Unit 1 Kitchen, Master Bedroom and Bedroom 2 (east side bedroom) The above glazing upgrade shall apply to all windows and doors in the specified room regardless of whether they face Carnelian Street or not. 70. Provide Unit-to-Unit noise control on building construction plans as noted in the Acoustical Analysis. Printed:9/30/2074 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 16 Item EFG62 Project# SUBTTIS928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Ennineerina Services Department 1. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Camelian Street Curb& Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees Curbside drain outlet 2. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 3. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 4. Install double yellow striping and a stop sign on-site. 5. An in-lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the opposite side of Camelian Street shall be paid to the City prior to issuance of building permits or approval of the final map, whichever occurs first. The fee shall be one-half the City adopted unit amount times the length of project frontage on Camelian Street. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 7. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. www.CityofRC.us Page a of to Printed:9/30!2014 Item EFG63 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: B. Engineerina Services Department 8. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50 percent of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department when the first Building Permit application is submitted to the Building and Safety Services Department. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project. 9. Street improvement plans shall be designed for the full length of the project frontage. If during plan check it becomes apparent that installing portions of the ultimate improvements will be infeasible due to conflicts with existing improvements to the north and/or south, install as much of the improvements as possible and deposit a cash contribution in lieu of construction for the balance. Said contribution shall include removal of interim improvements and completion of grading for both street and parkway improvements. Contribution in lieu of construction shall be paid prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 10. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44 total feet on Carnelian Street • 11. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 12. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 13. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, where no map is involved. 14. Reciprocal parking agreements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all common roads, drives, or parking areas shall be provided by CC & R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to, or concurrent with, the final parcel map. 15. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 16. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. Printed:9/30/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 18 Item EFG64 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Enaineering Services Department 17. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2)Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 18. Carnelian Street frontage shall be dedicated and improved in accordance with City "Secondary" standards as required and including: a. Provide curb and gutter, street trees, commercial drive approach, curbside drain outlets and sidewalk, as required. b. Provide one(1) 9500 Lumens HPSV street light. c. Protect or provide traffic striping and signage, as required. d. Drive approach to be in accordance with the City Std. Dwg. 101, Type C. 19. Transitions to existing curb and gutter on the north and south project boundaries shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. www.QtyofRC.us Page 10 of 16 Printed:9/30/2014 Item EFG65 i Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit I ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. B. Enaineerina Services Department 20. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Carnelian Street Botanical Name- Magnolia grandiflora"St Mary" Common Name-NCN Min. Grow Space-3' Spacing -20' 0.C. Size- 15 Gallon Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, • as determined by the City inspector. 3)All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 21. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 22. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. C. Fire Prevention/ New Construction Unit 1. Fire Lane Identification: Red curbing, pavement marking and/or signage shall identify the fire lanes. A Site Plan illustrating the proposed delineation that meets the minimum Fire District standards shall be included in the architectural plans submitted to B&S for review and approval. 2. Fire District access roadways include public roads, streets and highways, as well as private roads, streets drive aisles and/or designated fire lanes. Please reference the RCFPD Fire Department Access — Fire Lanes Standard and the current edition of California Fire Code for specific requirements. 3. Knox Rapid Entry System: are required in accordance to the RCFPD Residential Vehicular Gate • Standard and the RCFPD Knox Box Installation Standard. Printed:9/30/2014 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 16 Item EFG66 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: C. Fire Prevention/ New Construction Unit 4. Residential gates installed across Fire District access roads shall be installed in accordance with RCFPD Residential Gate Standard#5-3. 5. Access Control Gates: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, vehicular gates must be inspected, tested and accepted in accordance with RCFPD Standards by Fire Construction Services. 6. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial and multi-family buildings shall post the building addresses, address monuments, site directories, directional signage and suite designations in accordance to RCFPD Multi-Family Residential Addressing Standard. - 7. Confidential Business Occupancy Information.: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 8. Construction Access and Fire Protection Water Supply: The access roads must be paved in accordance with all the requirements of the RCFPD Fire Lane Standard #9-7. All temporary utilities over access roads must be installed at least 14' 6" above the finished surface of the road. Please refer to the RCFPD Standards# 14-1 & 14-2 for the requirements specific to fire protection water supply and fire department access during construction. 9. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CCBR's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 10. Fire Flow. A current fire flow letter from CVWD must be received. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the fire flow information from CVWD and submitting the letter to Fire Construction Services. 11. Fire Suppression Systems and/or other special hazard protection systems shall be inspected, tested and accepted by Fire Construction Services before occupancy is granted and/or equipment is placed in service. 12. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 W, x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 16 Printed:9/30/2014 Item EFG67 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. C. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit 13. Private Water Supply (Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit construction plans, specifications, flow test data and calculations for the private water main system for review and approval by the Fire District. Plans and installation shall comply with Fire District Standards. Approval of the on-site (private) fire underground and water plans is required prior to any Building Permit issuance for any structure on the site. Private on-site combination domestic and fire supply system must be designed in accordance with RCFPD Standards. The Building and Safety Services Department and Fire Construction Services will perform plan checks and inspections. All private on-site fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. Fire construction Services will inspect the installation, witness hydrant flushing and grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 14. Public Water Supply (Domestic/Fire) Systems: The applicant shall submit a plan showing the locations of all new public fire hydrants for the review and approval by the Fire District and CVWD. On the plan, show all existing fire hydrants within a 600-foot radius of the project. All required public fire hydrants shall be installed, flushed and operable prior to delivering any combustible framing materials to the site. CVWD personnel shall inspect the installation and witness the hydrant flushing. Fire Construction Services shall inspect the site after acceptance of the public water system by CVWD. Fire Construction Services must grant a clearance before lumber is dropped. 15. Prior to submitting plans for an overhead automatic fire sprinkler system, the applicant shall submit plans, specifications and calculations for the fire sprinkler system underground supply piping. Approval of the underground supply piping system (in accordance with RCFPD Standard) must be obtained prior to submitting the overhead fire sprinkler system plans. Include a copy of the approved underground plans as reference with the overhead submittal. 16. Address: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, commercial and multi-family buildings shall post the building addresses, address monuments, site directories, directional signage and suite designations in accordance to RCFPD Multi-Family Residential Addressing Standard. 17. Confidential Business Occupancy Information: The applicant shall complete the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Confidential Business Occupancy Information" form. This form provides contact information for Fire District use in the event of an emergency at the subject building or property. This form must be presented to the Fire Construction Services Inspector. 18. Fire Access Roadways: Prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy, the fire access roadways must be installed in accordance with the approved plans and acceptable to Fire Construction Services. The CC&R's, the reciprocal agreement and/or other approved documents shall be recorded and contain an approved fire access roadway map with provisions that prohibit parking, specify the method of enforcement and identifies who is responsible for the required annual inspections and the maintenance of all required fire access roadways. 19. Mapping Site Plan: Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, an 8 Y2" x 11" or 11" x 17" Site Plan of the site in accordance with RCFPD Standard shall be revised by the applicant to reflect the actual location of all devices and building features as required in the standard. The Site Plan • must be reviewed and accepted by the Fire Inspector. Printed:9/30/2014 www•QtyofRC.us Page 13 of 16 Item EFG68 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 _ Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: E. Grading Section 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 7. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 8. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 9. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout°Information for Grading Plans and Permit'. 10. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. if a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector, b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. www.CityofRC.us Page 14 of 16 Printed:9/30/2014 Item EFG69 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review,Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. E. Grading Section 11. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 12. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 13. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 14. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 15. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for • review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 16. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 17. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 18. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s)to be constructed offset from the property line. 19. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 20. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 21. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 22. Private streets for multifamily developments will include street plans as part of the Grading and Drainage Plan set. Plan view to show typical street sections. Profile view to show centerline and top of curb profiles. • 23. The maximum parking stall gradient is 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. Printed:9/30/2014 www.CilyofRC.us Page 15 of 16 Item EFG70 Project#: SUBTT18928 DRC2013-00824, DRC2013-00825 Project Name: 8 unit townhouse Location: 7490 CARNELIAN ST-020702211-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- E. ROJECT.E. Grading Section 24. Roof storm water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 25. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management. Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 26. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 27. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 28. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Carnelian Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. 29. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for all storm water quality management plan structural treatment devices to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 30. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 31. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 32. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent 33. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. www.CityofRC.us Page 16 of 16 Printed:9/30/2014 Item EFG71 RESOLUTION NO. 14-48 • A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING, COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00825, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 9 TREES IN CONJUNCTION WITH TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18928 AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2013-00824,A PROPOSAL TO CONSTRUCTAN 8- UNIT TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT ON 1.02 ACRE WITHIN THE MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED AT 7490 CARNELIAN STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-022-11. A. Recitals. 1. Alex Mustapha, filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of October 2014, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. • NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on October 8, 2014, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 and Design Review DRC2013-00824; and b. The application applies to a 1.02-acre parcel located at 7490 Carnelian Street- APN: 0207-022-11; and C. The subject property is zoned Medium (M) Residential; and d. The project site has an overall area of approximately 44,431 square feet (1.02 acre). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 100 feet in width by approximately 431-441 feet in length; and e. The property to the north of the subject site contains single-family residential and townhomes that are located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the east, across Carnelian Street, consist of single-family residential that are located within the Low (L) Residential District; the properties to the south, consist of single-family residential and a water tank located within the Medium (M) Residential District; the properties to the west, contain a flood channel located within the Flood Control (FC) District; and Item EFG72 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-48 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00825—ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 2 f. The applicant proposes to remove 9 trees including 3 Chinese Elms and 6 Ash trees; and g. The applicant has submitted an arborist report assessing the health of the individual trees. The report observes that there are 3 trees in poor condition, 3 trees in good condition, 4 trees in moderate condition and 1 dead tree; and h. The trees are not designated as historically significant; and i. The trees are not specifically noted in any Specific Plan; and j. It is necessary to remove the trees in order to grade the site and construct the townhouse development and associated improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property; and k. It is not necessary to remove the trees to construct required improvements within a flood control or utility right-of-way; and I. There are a significant number of mature trees within the surrounding neighborhood including various species to the north, east and south. Most of the trees being removed are on-site and do not affect the established character of the area and the property values; and m. The trees that can be preserved will be preserved in place; and n. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource of the City. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan; and b. The proposed project is in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and C. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code; and d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 4. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. In addition, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staffs determination of exemption. Item EFG73 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 14-48 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2013-00825—ALEX MUSTAPHA October 8, 2014 Page 3 • 5. Based upon the findings and conclusion's set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below. Planning Department 1) Section 17.80.040 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code requires that all heritage trees be replaced on a one-for-one basis,not less than 15-gallon size. 2) The replacement trees shall be planted on the same lot as the trees that are being removed. 3) This permit shall be valid for a period of 90 days, unless an extension is requested in writing at least 14 days prior to the expiration date. Where this permit is associated with development, the effective date begins and the 90 days shall start from the date of final map recordation or building permit issuance, whichever comes first. 4) All Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928 and Design Review DRC2013-00824 shall apply. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. • APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced,passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of October 2014, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item EFG74 LNahSIGN-IN SHEET MEETING � PLANNING COMMISSION RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 8, 2014 NAME COMPANY ADDRESS/EMAIL �5,f (mss Os�ySf� '�G►5�:ne.� Erin 5t#q gme �M J 74r18 Cedrebzet 94, -;� � � }tea /1'll� �0��✓I i nn� o 104/ n u n '7/73 Ll!f,2 ✓,� �' �' WORKSHOP Arguments AGAINST development of 8 townhomes at the residence located at 7490 Carnelian St. Rancho Cucamonga is known as the"City with a Plan". According to the Rancho Cucamonga website,this concept"became the cornerstone of the City's first General Plan in 1981, ensuring that Rancho Cucamonga would remain a unique and balanced community in the face of unprecedented growth.The plan concentrated on public safety, a balanced development/sustainability, and good quality of life." This proposal seems less about a"plan concentrated on public safety,balanced development/sustainability, and good quality of life"and more about an opportunistic Real Estate developer looking to.make a quick buck at the expense of the city and its citizens. I believe that the proposal of tearing down one home and building 8 -` townhomes on the same 1 acreis unsafe and brings a poorer quality of life to the citizens of this area. I certainly don't believe that it is balanced or sustainable. And finally, I don't believe that the city needs this development. I believe that the negatives far outweigh the benefits in this proposal. I will elaborate on my reasons in the paragraphs below. Do we really NEED 8 townhomes within a single acre of land in this area? This proposal would separate a track of 4 houses into a single home and then 2 homes. From the north going south it would go: Creekside Apartments, my home at 7478 Carnelian St.,the proposed 8 townhomes, 2 homes below that, and finally the condos at Vivero St. With the cramped location, I can't imagine that the townhomes would be worth much in Real Estate value (bringing in more low-income families), but would definitely result in the loss of property value for the surrounding homes. Is the need for townhomes so great that it is worth breaking up a historical part of the Red Hill community? Property contains a lot of very old trees. These trees house several bird species including: • a nest for a pair of Peregrine Falcons which are on the California`Fully Protected' species list, • lots of Sparrows (including what looks like a San Clemente Sage Sparrow— on the California`Threatened and Endangered Birds' list), • and a dozen or more other bird species possibly including an owl (I've heard but not seen) I would recommend doing an assessment to determine if there are endangered species at the location and how construction would impact these species. There needs to be access to the Water Tower. The townhomes would increase the problem of kids playing in the Wash. Currently kids have been jumping the wall between the Creekside apartments and the property in question and going into the Wash from there. Currently,the Sheriffs are sending police cars as well as deploying helicopters to fight this problem. Building 8 townhomes on this property would make it even more likely that kids from both the apartments and the proposed townhomes would be constantly entering the Wash area, thus creating more incidents and costing the city more money to combat this problem. Construction at the site could lead to the falling of a retaining wall between the proposed site and the property at 7478 Carnelian St. and the parking lot of Creekside apartments. This wall is about 5'tall on the north facing side and 8'tall on the south facing side. It is.built using narrow cinder blocks. I am unsure as to whether this wall is filled with concrete or if it uses rebar. Heavy construction alohg this wall could easily result in this wall being toppled. If this were to happen it could undercut the properties north of the wall resulting in broken concrete on both the apartment parking lot as well as the patio at 7478 Carnelian St.which also includes an 8-person spa and a gazebo. These townhomes would create more traffic accidents. This area already has'a high number of accidents. Adding 8 townhomes with their families and thus their vehicles would create even more cross-traffic and result in even more accidents. I would recommend that you get the opinion of the Police and Fire Departments as to 4ether they believe building these townhomes would be safe for the community. I would also recommend a traffic study to further test the safety. I s • �d! .F•• '������w�.ti , w * .,+ a .. d•" `• Via•.�m '� � `-�, N �' � y� . lie WM i. `'%141 .tY .. A k•. I 4� f, "MINI Awl VQE 14� �ra .� • , r 'V w'"eS 4z • Ale AL dr 1 4 s« •t , ,�y • I 1 a, .'.fi f «Y , w IIS'/ ,! •�.` t'.t� ,R�.�•! �ii 77.. • )Z � ( � � •moi . ( � 1 4 +r- { "+ 9w, ^'�' •�" NK aA-.t \Y `,��r"'i � e.-''1�`' ►'-°' .wltr?; : - _ yrs .� ��s .� "n t 1.',+/!"aM. , ,A ® �4• . � ►' . `�►• '{•••ISM/• �.i': * -tL "�- _ ♦K p,i•.�,,` e.A' ^ r7 tom. _ ,�, IF t - All In ,. - '•rT"` a• . � pe +f t �, jwA it ~•, •y � , w � �• •�_ .Y � �lip ��- a< at , #..,. 1 a / r. •.i-.I r f1 r,x `!' a ., h. Y - �k 7 � ' t.• '' ' Nie• ��! tl• ,it+ , q �,+' �,1�• r`}+ .X '1'r� �. • •,as+y�f i 1'.�� �'yf ttj, t �\' - r, -•C �" ;.. �'y"� s: ,.� .n �� �& .a w \,� - `; .:�- '�W"y■ � i`• �• ,.•���± I��i•r` ,�, ti•� •�,M• ��,.:4..y.J• ^t`�� \�""�S �,y `g �.4�:�y�.m �},`•MF +,t '•`t- a ,� •. r:.r r 4,r Ej'�R�4Z 7r '-At 'Cr. ♦'�t ��k,�F: �.:�.- i t� �, � vR.Y - P � •y� ''', :`/�M�*+'S"F�_�+7'�r' :r` ��'.9y � % .. } � ��. aw � �7r d. �, ,\ �, � � 'I yam-\ r•• ,�f r •�. rr� �' p1'rR t w4>. {^ i•ttC ,ti �. ?°Z, ,R♦ f .{ / r i r l•i�t fJ/ 4 �' �r x, -,yRXt ; ' 'y,�-' •'S r a� � �",,gyp !��.• •1 a i,�' f �� y� � f,•� r .�,7' � t x � 1 `• t i aq �� \-' .�,�.' ` ^" -•—`R..,r.f •--+y �'.,�", m N7 . t ♦ _"`�,• L , ��' •/ .♦• �. • , 3 ',. ' y�,�. t*I �r' ..: . , t\ 24- '� '{7►� r. ti f o/ :a'0±►+ +T 'R' � � t J f I;r e '►� { ,I '�j� i , ( � 1 b ,r 4{- Er ,��� .r - -'�. �,!'��j� �,1�' �`v�'/\•t,IL, '.. r7 1• t •,( C Y_ 1 i K�.� � � •4__ r: s' �' r�.+- , � ��` ! r - M+ '` '!7:•„��1'.t'w+y rti Y 7 rd,F +r ��'l,♦ 1'.�. r.1' 1 /..�4,: �'l. �!j/�� ,I! ���,� `' ��, ,t - .:,wyl Y 1/ ++: ;�y `R►i'L_, y.'�,rt F�I�,Y.1►1 •�+,, �J..Y }. ] ,/ •l �' r .+, � �' �',' r �� J. +�. ; R , . LIZ 1W. ''ilk idA .r 1 . 771?' ? f�/tI�• :� a rl` r' Ofir•,. tu �! ,? `� rj''• .♦y l" .� �♦� ,�r(� •;.'+li, `` \'T� *�» I` iii �4 •'� '" '`'r-f. r J. + 1 '�1 or ko 1'R '�a i• lad lye ♦,r��t� 4,� .. r 1, Ii � �- ' •1'.! Y• ;�• }1 �, C �`C+4 r" V� L`•� �` �• )��R „`" a '( ` 'r 'sir R• r. .t l p- J• '1. l X ,�r,may. '3 y.� .a '��•'!�'.`}j. r. �f 4,.-�i/. .�`;.•�- R`t .� ,�• ��'' `�f+"'\ rl ,r w_ � � '�� `�! ,.r \ {•\,+` • '•� t l! �•� 'A� •u' 't��^b �� �J . 1 11 �ciw�.,t. r 4 ,'�f�",.y�ry/ +. r - x f�;•'ejrRl r � .�lY 6�`1`, �1 1�, ,� ` /llr►►`"' - �1 R , � J. x ,,,,, � �`;a ,�� ��M1'` i�b�'i• "'?"•i ; � � S.� ���'! �•r \ ' v I ^� 1f�, sfII �+'~� �` . :1 'f' � ,j+r,y - \`•;`_ ,\ .fd) •R ^1 } ,, r- ,••�Y S Fi ��` r"r 'rr.' �.• �+•'�,;�,'1, ! '7 � ,��ti �tl �.r�..�r�.�•r �• :.'§�rl� + -.� ''��t+ • t I' [`;y' ,�.,1t � .•� 1 � .� ,Y iy,J�,./�•'8.�1 ,'ter. ��4_rr� r � R� b i � j ? �ia '�.. r.i A •_ �. f1 �� r•,'i r r , {,�1/ ,. . OL 4r� riA 1: .x:'.�� `� � ` *, �f;g '�♦_� a - „/♦, �r.� 7,(,w1,; 7 s v. r�'1 t 1 �1. ` \, .t , .i kd�y ►.. `1F' .,, +� •Cr Iii r� 1�'c• t ,�fi '�+ �. vQ 't^ \,R .+ 1.} r\�. � Iyy�l� ��, + ♦' 1-7 •r��Pr�r, E �.. _ f t /r• '� �r '�A ,, ��t � c• �it'�•ri� ijjj -'!. `•�� }+ }^� ,,' -�A r •. �.?� �''�• :� �pIT �R• f r �'M� 1 4i. • fr�.' .; J R�Y fC��l ,y� '.�'_ �j '�\i �/'•�•y,'a�;i.,��r"� f �� �, t: ` ;'�x�. \ i ' ..r d' .,1• 1 ! '' '��" ( �i r �.���it .''l��r,;* V� i'• +� `•f S �� ::` �y•^7f` l�``.; ' •'+ r r� , 1 j �R ' lY f�� 1 yy V/• •'.<(� �'� •i `^"� ' 1 4 fit, a1 l L. SM 1r' ?^'.t--- iS ,� •+ ,� �i Li`_.. rLii��, ��;'l.. •. y 1�f♦: 'i 1_ i..` i' rs. j AL Y' .M ut _qtr �, � a��•� � � '� � �_:•T4�i.�Yr.��'�. � _ '�` e"��. � � � ,•\• '��.�. -r.. Ar 4z' ., r•' � ' • T ,, Kew .r .,d '4.. 'low. n Schrader, Lois From: Leslie Ericson <johnandles@road runner.com> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 3:36 PM To: Nakajima, Mayuko Cc: Schrader, Lois Subject: Re: Project# - DRC2013-00824 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi May, Will you please be sure that my email below dated February 26, 2014 is included on the record for this proposed project. Thank you, Leslie Ericson Sent from my iPad On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:53 PM, Nakajima, Mayuko <Mayuko.Nakajima2city9frc.us> wrote: Hello Ms. Ericson, Thank you for forwarding us your concerns. During our phone discussion, there was a question whether or not this project would require a traffic signal. This project was evaluated by our Engineering Department and they had determined that a traffic signal is not necessary at this location. As shown in the photo below, there is an existing divider on Carnelian Street where cars are able to make their turns to and from the project site. The project will be required to install all frontage street improvements such as sidewalks, curb and gutter, etc. If you still have additional comments or concerns specifically related to traffic, please refer to our Engineering staff, who I have copied to this email. Thank you, <Picture (Device Independent Bitmap) 1.jpg> MAYUKO NAKAJIMA I Assistant Planner I City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department a:909.477.2750 : 909.477.2847 1 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 -----Original Message----- From: Leslie Ericson [mai Ito:'oh nand lesCc)roadrunner.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 6:45 AM To: Nakajima, Mayuko Subject: Project#- DRC2013-00824 Mayuko, I am a resident who lives nearby the above-mentioned project and write to express my concern regarding the traffic in and out of the proposed project site. This proposed project is on Carnelian south of Baseline and slightly north of Vivero. Carnelian is a very busy street especially during peak traffic times and my 1 HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION DRC2014- 00769 - JASON & JULIE LEONARD - A request to designate the Jamison House as a historic landmark within the Low Residential (L) District located at 8204 Archibald Avenue; APN : 020837714. MILLS ACT DRC2014-00770 - JASON & JULIE LEONARD - A request to implement the use of the Mills Act to reduce property tax for the Jamison House , a potential historic landmark located at 8204 Archibald Avenue; APN : 020837714. RANCHO CUCAMONGA �• • •r.,.,i i , _rQi, >!t `l r -tel _ ..4� V�. ir ! :r F orf 7y y I' s, r„r ? 't" �1 YT l.�i7 iL ter` f - e•rr�, .:�"A -'r - Qi,`..- r 4 d.:r �=t •„�?�1 jh r _ Y i Y , rk' 6 � ��� �� 4 I I t ♦ 1y u. .� r`ti :y'��r�:�A r� +,�' �- I.n t l���h�: a.�,{S rtl � .� � •. � �q�� -� �� r' �'-a� t-rF'.• �� } y ¢I�F' I.oil, r���` 1- �.l��'r� �. �w.�'���I �'�� I �, Y� NIq'�1(hga�, TS" . � `_3'rr _ Lr t` •a r�,!� ` ' - r ' J r•1 If .1 {t A•,�u 41, I .�• �'���i •-i �� -� ISL �,��,' ..y � .' + I, � 'ter �::- ai � y r >• 1,`(/.,ILS, ,.�pr f_ f'' _ ,'� 1 y k.:*. ' 'r� ^• ° � _ It,� _ •`{+?�.. r 'T q r,1,r' �_� � I �` 15�t Ptx �`'� ,'�" � ,r � �'� �, �'.E o � �' it -Y•+[ Ll{A IS 1 r � E Y�Jr re.,�i I� ( •. Y, �1 z ty ' _ k 't ~" 44 �J. - h -_ �i V rtt, r• ��7.Y �t. . iL�:��� -.r .. y d- -.,J�4 +r�l�f 7 �.rZt .� � .f',Y J r r '��M"lt�t r.- �S-�b+l I -, -. >✓r' '.�.{ a � � �I „� Y - - I � f �'y r.-`.�d ° � �i'5..� r y t r rf - +5'-y rtiy L,y L J 4 .7 A 1 { S1- 1 ,v' \ � L, •� , �FY>• ,"' `,.- '�_ t ' 1 � � r A I s_,ice 4' F►7•.. - li _ • i Ei' -• �; - � 1 J ��• -a�� r � d _ � _.w?' 7 r�" �'-,ti r�' r�u,u �� � rp';, q• - r 4rtc i > 'r1i 4 yy .� '•�. 1r6 :i(r 4 "LF _�' klt'�.7�"':�� - 'I •',�+�. ,�,r�. .., ' ^? �' i��sr�,.�b1J:e. c ��t �E� - j S"L �.'l �,= j ° 4 � 7I['•� F i 4. r F I♦, - " _ r"� L�irr .� 1 _2 .a - ! f F _ 'irJi, a'.n rrt ,+r .. hd�. t"^'r 1 �,��Iti`i'• y r u _ 1r. J, i � .� iv r Y'7', '-,�+� , I - ,k - 'si. r �4 1 am c•- n L -r.; 's'L i "'� p � ti- � r. �cl• ,_ y"nt L• MF�t" `#� '•3`r :�K hrF#� ',y iM `. F �'�' u r � a� �. '�-�`- ,f 11y V' - .s„2.` r r. F t �,c. p�� d ,. -k3a t '{ Lf +k Ill i 6 ..• r` kr I n'- „ ,.� ,;�V �[, ._rf,,,rr.ter _ Fr,� ':�r I� -fir 6- tee yaar, I y 17 _+yr'�'kn�;;� ,waQr�' ' e 'y>� ,_ --+,•, r �, :q y..,,,. L � 4.. }' '� 4 i ��, 11 r t�';_�� �'�•��' � ti�� ter'• r 1;}r1 7'�' .a F� '''' , � r �'.,_. __,•J'F i� 1 '7,y. L. _ y,L ._W 7' f`� �f} ti-yt'{'� ?(•r r-�yr-. _ ��7��,I.��'-_L�� '��y` r 1� �' • ';•� �r � �.�_r i g , ,x .� -,i.-�S; ,_K, b: .- F i,r�_ 5��.%^`I'�qi��'��` .:kr�•'",�*� � r• .� , �. _ �C'f�Y•�-���kr: ' :� ' r,o-lr}d `J �f.9• -'�P.��, '�� I �� r ,.r�� .: 'NF ` ate• ='fe- - Tl'*..y t fi , , a. - '. l�t�... --al,yi� ("'• J _ , ,}�•T,� 5 : -�;�j 177 ,] 1Y•_ ;t �rk !t lr, ,� ^- •;-' Rr�e.'' i i.�� r� '- r M 1 r �uw..r {� •�"1L' _ " - _ _�„ .$r A r'_,L{ _. L ,,s r ,� nY: � i •L-I_T�r� V;. ',N�' - to i, iff ,. 1� J c�� _ � � ��' _" r,�� i,�1�1 �.�i�: � SL.,� i^ 4. ti C7 y`� �Y J a. ,� !a-+1 r',�„ - E G � � Rq 1 ; yE �l � - k-� s_I�Y3 t -4° . °•r 'a r �f� r. � derl L..rx,,.� � ei'; `& _ � _ t• �v,-. i -..t �rel'- � r ts. ` .. - az � r_i,:h -�'.. J � �fl.'- - � { + u.�` . � r '`�'. �:� - �: •-��', r„aH 'gI''y�tib�� +�, �Lr f_u� f I � � - ° `-k 9 _- kt ..'J � ! z N�,• •�,-t q�� - I _ tir r?�a.L"� ,fit'. �7'•� r� �.^ �'+ J �' - _ z i id 21 it „ '� ' ,�v ~ 'Q{nem- •t ' � � t •'3�w5 ri, 41 - ., 1_j,dr-rV/ � y � • `L tiC* - 4 Project Location a T MF Im 6-0 J s. �� � '- � _ ���,,,�,�' i M� '�- .esti. � • � { � � -" 54 _mil - � -� • E + ,�+ • J0. T. RANCHO C;UCAMONGA At lor W IWO r3 • ii• Rn* • • ••rr}•rt••'iaa••• z114 4ri•ti • 1!r#0006 + • ._o, < < 06*0"02t iei�ii . see " f# •*i•4 •!*• 7•t #•.a0 & . •sya'• • • •a& a •! a .• f• ► 49 6408 s•i, aarisf ++ j&41F 4 #4600 #o•r *Imi � •1• t • # i_0i� i •A�� i • 4i • �• • . _ f a• •iisa i +ark �i�a �• • •• • .� �► -• ra• .r # *�I • • , a , •f f!, ►ii• .r aa ♦ aa•r ♦ toe - IBM So MIS I vT J' F 1 A � f a 14, • 1 04 41 0110 4 ^1► Ts• tlar*f6MJ4Itff:#■ !loA%.raa ta►Yo.y" }r�� 1 9 140 M t s#tM• •.j.i. / X11•• • � W y � r• Oil., �.*64P14 Pillar toe jWjr - of it `� rr11�r rid as a � •i fTV et •trf •> •tr al• a9 its l�! ��a!rrs{■rt t •f f•� is # Wt Old At *90 •rMaa•N*♦ V f t;ala obtridjOpmes lop*100i b Mi#Ptlfe/it. rlftai ` ifYtraefrrRf►n•se� S• • 1• •i •ri■ts+ � " � •• 11�4•f • ffi4 # at •rt v Iry Al ••W" y a 1pE a, a �. �t at if a•1 '••a* �� 4 or 1fob1• !#t it f tis a 92.801'• 94 er••■ *t#7t'R1tf•• rrr�. r a�aa►sasa►• a int # 1 � *s�esr�sr�•► ••►r 4 rr�ifsfs* •f►#sr je A& Aft � T - �y r .- r� , Iv Is ,r Iola • • a EDw ® i 147 a '+' ��i•c ~ 1 i 1 ..�"s'r t r �- Rs • f Le ti, • Facts for Finding Fact/s: The property is a prime example of the local agricultural economy, which was an important part of early Cucamonga. Fact/s: The property is associated with the Jamisons, who were an early family that grew deciduous fruit trees, an important part of the local produce supply of the area. Fact/s: The dwelling is a good example of Craftsman architecture and has been well maintained . Fact/s: The structure and property has potential to yield information about the local agricultural economy. Fact/s: The proposed landmark retains high integrity from their period of significance with respect to setting , location , materials, workmanship, association , design and feeling . It retains sufficippi integrity to convey its historic, cultural , or architectural significance. RANCHO C;UCAMONGA Conclusion • Environmental Assessment: The project is categorically exempt under Section 15331 as a Class 31 exemption of the guidelines for the California Environmental Quality Act. • Correspondence: The Historic Landmark Designation was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted , and notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet of the project site. • Recommendation : Staff recommends that the Historic Preservation Commission recommend approval of Landmark Designation DRC2014-00769 and Mills Act DRC2014-00770 to be forwarded to the City Council for final action . RANCHO CUCAMONGA Planning Commission Meeting ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rogow 8 Unit Townhouse Development Alex Mustapha Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1 8928 i Design Review DRC2013-00824 � Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825 �YmC' . . �j " 11� - - . 1 - SolAToo s' CD- �� �1i8.µ, 5'..-a4 J� ..+�'y 'A� - +� G A •I T {�� :+ — y _ ,yr � ,s I •.1• •4 =�. ti istiC .Y - ,., ,� ��, ,�� � 'r,-� Ars �;■+, � ��, '�l� C7 _ e ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------- --------------- IML %tow Tentative Tract Map: Subdivision of 1 .02-acre parcel for purposes of constructing an 8-unit townhouse development Design Review: 8-unit townhouse development along south side of property o Three bedrooms, two stories, garage for each unit o open private/common space proposed: open lawn area, tot lot play area, and barbecue/picnic area o Private landscaped front lawn area for each unit (298 square feet) Tree Removal: A request to remove 9 heritage trees October 8, 2014 Typical Floor Plan -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I fM it q El p 011 �M Rp�l• � "-' ( p M •IIF •N� •.0 1 � r wpn � - �.,ac I .wW Mr p1 I O l • wogvw WEOYtt HM'fLl MdllOp Yyt n�� ♦ t1_ 71t- il I .. • M wr �.•ci wi.�v.a.we....oc.r.o,...n., SECOND FLOOR FIRST FLOOR (INTERIOR UNIT 2,4,6) (INTERIOR UNIT 2,4,6) •OD„W,FWa!pauo conE��«nwwnwrnt.u October2014 Elevations ------------ ---------- 1 � h� SOUTH ELEVATION-LOOKING NORTH WEST ELEVATION-LOOKING EAST Unit#1-Model'A' U rnt#1-Model'A scale IA--r-0" Scale 1M=I'U" €1t�t M >♦... were�� EAST ELEVATION-LOOKING WEST NORTH ELEVATION-LOOKING SOUTH U nit#1-Model'A U nit#1-Model'A' sale IA••r-o,• soak IA-•ro• ------------ -- ----------------------------------------------------------- 6 ---- ----- ------ -- • 2 spaces per unit • Each unit has a 2 car garage • Visitor parking — 1 per 3 units Garages were set back 19 feet l October i Neig rhood-Meefing -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 09F gA Held on December 12 , 2013 At No attendance from public Email received from resident on February 261 2014 — concern with traffic safety and access to project site October 8, 2014 Awl& z5tudies Provided- ----- - _ ---------------------- 8 ----- --------------------------------------------------------- --- ---------- • Acoustical AnalysisM— � r_ vi- Arborist p Report �� -JVD p - • Cultural Resources Assessment 1 3 Rd • GHG/ Air Quality * Included noise conditions and n - construction methods to project to reduce noise issues related to project i.e. - STC glazing to all windows and doors Noise Contours for Units 1 and 2, cement block perimeter 70 dBA CNEL wall, specific wall construction for unit-to- 65 dBA CNEL unit noise — 60 dBA CNEL 55 dBA CNEL L � October 8, 2014 Tre—e Removal Pe—rmft-DTZ=T3-uu --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 - --------------------------------------- - - ------------------------------------ -------- - TREE. REMOVE t �1 TREE! TREE 3a + ------- RLLCW ---- / REMOVE REMOVEMINNOW a � �T.o•p0� ,t.�]. REMOVEa TWE 1a * rRfEa _, REMOVE REMOArE E I} REMOVE ^11 .3' 1TRIBE*E ' ""TT. TREE E TREE.E W"O"0YE # REMOF REMOVE, REMOVE vcsOEHcei b ;'b a EI i Q i 1 1 GI TREk IS TREE Y ff TREE N �l`ONLRETE Re." ` 1 RE3�TR REMOVE�Q 1h R��'�2 T^ cawcnErE .v� i ] k 1fiEE 7] THEE 3, •�`•-_Sy`` `` p i TREE ��ti j" .� RFl1O` !r d TREE \ •�d]l # MEE,. a PREP REMOVE REM1 12 OVE TYDVE TREE 32 THEE 3]lIF PTREE71 Tau-11 ELLP— -- — REv —tea » — • 41 trees existing on-site _ • 11 trees are considered to be Heritage Trees • Of the 11 heritage trees, 9 are proposed for removal • Requesting to remove 34 trees total as part of project • Replace at 1 to 1 ratio • Landscape plans show total of 56 trees on-site October Committees --------- ------------------------------------ - --------- 10 ----- ----------------------- -- -- -- ---------- - -- - -------- ----- --------------------------------- • Grading and Technical Review Committees: June 17, 2014 • Design Review Committee: June 17, 2014 • Design Review Committee: September 2, 2014 IL IL T I UNIT # 3 UNIT #4 UNIT # 5 i MODEL 'C') (MODEL 'B') (MODEL 'C') October2014 tal Assessment En—vironmen ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Planning Department staff has determined that the � project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the � Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 ( In-Fill Development Projects) because the project includes in-fill development consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and regulations. In addition , there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Kecommenclation ----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18928, Design Review DRC2013-00824 , and Tree Removal Permit DRC2013-00825 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of approval with conditions .