HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-11-10-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC (2) 0
THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
;CHO SPECIAL MEETING/WORKSHOP OF
C,UCAMONGA
THE PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 10, 2015 - 4:30 PM
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
***TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM***
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I. CALL TO ORDER
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
oChairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca _
Munoz Macias Fletcher
II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the
Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic
Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may
receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.
Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair,
depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed
directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the
audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please
refrain from any debate between audience and speaker,making loud noises,or engaging in any activity
which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.
III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
A. PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
DRC2015-00040 — SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. (LEWIS OPERATING
• CORP.) — A workshop to discuss a proposal to amend the Rancho Cucamonga
Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) Subarea 18 Specific Plan in order to allow a mixed
use project on a property currently developed with the Empire Lakes Golf Course, a
private facility located north of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, east of Cleveland
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 10, 2015
Page 2
cnt�oxcA
Avenue, and south of 8th Street and the BNSF/Metrolink rail line. Related files: General
Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115,
and Development Agreement DRC2015-00118.
F= IV. ADJOURNMENT
1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,or my designee, hereby
certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 5, 2015, at least 72 hours
prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga.
If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,
please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48
hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.
INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC
TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION
The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given
the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you
may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the
views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain
from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience.
The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission,
please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and
speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium.
It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are
generally limited to 5 minutes per individual.
If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments."
Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for
distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be
used for the official public record.
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP
NOVEMBER 10, 2015
MON Page 3
All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for
scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director.
AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS
Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning
Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These
documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00
a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays.
APPEALS
Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's
decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office
and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and
governed by the City Council).
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session.
Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at
www.CityofRC.us
O
O
VicinityMap
Planning Commission Workshor
November 10 , 2015
I fE
L d B �
d E
_F
i C. 0 = L 0 i
1 :i2
CL X
N
{
ti
L, m —_•\ O
tt
19th St
t
i
Base Line Base Line
J
irk Church
Church
4
Foothill• , Foothill N
71011
� L I
Arrow E 3 Arrow
J rs ey 3 i
8th W
C7 6th y A1(
� 6th w
7
A 4th ¢ _ _ —.---- 4th
7k Meeting Location:
City Hall.
10500 Civic Center Drive
Item A: Workshop re: Specific Plan amendment DRC2015-00040—SC Develop-
ment Corp (Lewis Operating Corp.)
STAFF REPORT
• PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DATE: November 10, 2015 RANCHO
CUCAMONGA
TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission
FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director
BY: Mike Smith, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
DRC2015-00040 — SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. (LEWIS OPERATING
CORP.) — A workshop to discuss a proposal to amend the Rancho Cucamonga
Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) Subarea 18 Specific Plan in order to allow a mixed
use project on a property currently developed with the Empire Lakes Golf Course, a
private facility located north of 4th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, east of Cleveland
Avenue, and south of 8th Street and the BNSF/Metrolink rail line. Related files: General
Plan Amendment DRC2015-00114, Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00115,
and Development Agreement DRC2015-00118.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this workshop is to give the Planning Commission and interested
public an introduction and overview of the proposed amendment to the Rancho Cucamonga
Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) Subarea 18 Specific Plan to allow the reuse of the Empire
Lakes Golf Course site as a mixed use project. The proposed project will be set for public hearing
• at a future date at which time public testimony will be taken and consideration of the proposed
project will occur. At this workshop, the only action taken will be to receive and file the report
presented. In that future public hearings will be required, the Commission is requested to refrain
from commentary for or against the project but to ask for any clarification of the elements of the
proposed project..
ACTION: The Secretary will receive and file the report.
GENERAL:
A. Site Description: The project site is the Empire Lakes Golf Course, currently a privately owned
and operated 18-hole golf course with an area of 160 acres located in the Rancho Cucamonga
Industrial Area Specific Plan (IASP) Subarea 18 Specific Plan (hereafter referred to as the
"Empire Lakes Specific Plan" or "Specific Plan"). The physical limits of the "planning area" of
the Specific Plan are 4th Street to the south, Milliken Avenue to the east, Cleveland Avenue and
Utica Avenue to the west, and 8th Street and the BNSF/Metrolink rail line to the north (Exhibit A).
The golf course is generally located at the center of this planning area. Both the golf course and
the planning area are bisected into north and south halves by 6th Street. To the east of the golf
course are multi-family residences comprising four (4) apartment complexes (Village at the
Green, Reserve at Empire Lakes, Ironwood at Empire Lakes, and AMLI at Empire Lakes).
Adjacent to the northeast corner of the golf course are office buildings and a Metrolink station.
To the west of the south and north halves of the golf course are office buildings and
logistics/manufacturing buildings, respectively. To the north of the golf course are additional
logistics/manufacturing buildings. To the south, on the opposite side of 41h Street, is vacant land
• within the City of Ontario. The Specific Plan is comprised of eleven (11) Planning Areas (IA/IB—
X). The golf course is within "Planning Area IA", "Planning Area IB", and (partly) "Planning Area
Item A-1
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00040—SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. (LEWIS
OPERATING CORP.)
November 10, 2015
Page 2
III" of the Specific Plan (Exhibit B). The land use designation of the golf course is "Open Space"
in the City's General Plan.
B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning (relative to the Empire Lakes Specific Plan):
North - Industrial Logistics and Manufacturing Buildings; Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial
(MI/HI) District
South - Commercial Center; Ontario Center Specific Plan (2254-SP) (in the City of Ontario)
East - Industrial Offices/Logistics Buildings, a Commercial Center, and Hotels; General
Industrial (GI) District, Industrial Park (IP) District, and Industrial Park (IP) District,
(Industrial Commercial Overlay District (ICOD))
West - Industrial Offices/Logistics Buildings and Vacant Land; General Industrial (GI)
District and Industrial Park (IP) District
C. General Plan Designations:
North - Heavy Industrial
South - Mixed Use—Ontario Mills (in the City of Ontario)
East - General Industrial and Industrial Park
West - General Industrial and Industrial Park
D. Project Description: The applicant, SC Rancho Development Corp., an entity of Lewis
Operating Corp., is in the process of purchasing the privately owned land occupied by Empire
Lakes Golf Course. The applicant proposes to amend the "Empire Lakes Specific Plan" in order
allow the "redevelopment" of the golf course with a mixed use project ("Planning Area 1° or
"Empire Lakes"). The amendment will 1) revise/delete existing text and graphics in the Specific
Plan that are associated with the Empire Lakes Golf Course; 2) re-designate Planning Area IA,
Planning Area IB, and part of Planning Area III as Planning Area 1 (PA1); and 3) incorporate
design and technical standards/guidelines into the Specific Plan that will be used to govern the
development of Empire Lakes. At this time, applications facilitating development (construction)
within the project site, such as tentative tract/parcel maps and/or conceptual site and building
plans, have not been submitted for review by the City — these applications will be submitted by
the applicant, or other developers, at a future date.
The applicant proposes a project currently titled Empire Lakes, that will be comprised of a
combination of high density residential, commercial, and office uses in an "urban" setting. The
physical arrangement of the project is intended to reduce reliance on automobiles, and
encourage walking, bicycling, and use of mass transit including the Metrolink Station
immediately north of the project site.
Empire Lakes will be comprised of six (6) "Placetypes" — Transit (T), Mixed Use (MU), Urban
Neighborhood (UN), Core Living (CL), Village Neighborhood (VN), and Recreation (REC) —that
will function similarly to zoning districts (Exhibit B). There will be a range in the permitted
density of residential units per acre for each Placetype. Generally, Placetypes with the highest
allowable density range will be located north of 6th Street near the Metrolink station. Those
Placetypes with the lowest allowable density range will be located south of 6th Street. The land
uses regulations that will apply within each Placetype are flexible to allow for residential and
non-residential uses in close proximity to each other. Other land uses that will be allowed within
Item A-2
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00040— SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. (LEWIS
• OPERATING CORP.)
November 10, 2015
Page 3
Empire Lakes include live/work units, "start-ups", and small-scale businesses. Automobile-
related land uses such as gas stations, drive-thru facilities, car washes, etc. will not be permitted
anywhere within Empire Lakes. There is intended to be both for rent and for sale housing types
within the development.
A defining characteristic of Empire Lakes will be a street called "The Vine" (Exhibit C). This
public street will be aligned approximately along the north-south axis of Empire Lakes and will
be continuous between 4th Street and the Metrolink station. The Vine will be two (2) lanes in
width (one lane per direction) with a bicycle lane on both sides of the street. At various
locations along The Vine there will be roundabouts, enhanced pedestrian crosswalks, and
pedestrian-oriented, small-scale parks. To facilitate access and circulation for both
pedestrians, bicycles, and automobiles throughout Empire Lakes, and to maximize the efficient
use of land, all streets will be designed to follow a grid-iron pattern (as practically possible).
To further these objectives, curvilinear streets will not be permitted while cul-de-sacs will be
permitted only in limited circumstances. Also, fences and gates that restrict access will not be
permitted anywhere within Empire Lakes except where necessary to secure, some private
spaces and private amenities, or features such as pools where safety fencing is required by the
Building Code. A goal of the project is to create an open, walkable, and inviting urban
environment.
There will be between 2,650 — 3,450 dwelling units of various types within Empire Lakes
• including apartments, condominiums, and single-family residences. The net density range of
Empire Lakes will be between 19.7 — 25.7 du/acre. Empire Lakes will have up to 220,000
square feet of non-residential, i.e. office, commercial, etc., uses (Exhibit D). These types of
uses will be generally concentrated within the Mixed Use (MU) Placetypes. Non-residential
uses also will be permitted anywhere along the entire length of The Vine within the Mixed Use
Overlay ("the Overlay"). The actual amount of floor area devoted to non-residential uses within
the Overlay will vary due to market demand. The applicant proposes a maximum of 85,000
square feet - with no minimum requirement. In order to fulfill the intent of the project, Staff
recommends a minimum requirement of 75,000 square feet.
The amended Specific Plan includes design and technical guidelines/standards to encourage
aesthetic variety and flexibility in design solutions that will minimize architectural monotony and
large blocks of buildings with the same architecture (Exhibit E). The guidelines/standards will
describe methods for scale, massing, and articulation to ensure that the the buildings "frame"
the street with an emphasis on creating an interesting pedestrian experience and to provide
opportunities for "active" spaces such as small-scale "pocket parks" and "parklets", plazas,
outdoor dining areas, etc. To further emphasize the "urban" nature of Empire Lakes, all
buildings within the Mixed Use Overlay will be required to have a massing that is predominately
three-story. Varying heights would be permitted in order to create articulation and points of
visual interest. Single-story elements would be limited to, for example, pedestrian-level spaces
and small-scale architectural elements such as porches. There will be no minimum building
setback requirement along The Vine. Similarly, the minimum building setback requirements
along the other streets (public and private) within Empire Lakes will be significantly less than
what is required for similar streets in other areas of the City. These reduced street setbacks
• are consistent with the intent of the new standards for Mixed Use development that were
adopted by the City Council on November 4, 2015.
Item A-3
PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP
SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00040=SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. (LEWIS
OPERATING CORP.)
November 10, 2015
Page 4
Although the project is a mixed use development, it is recognized that automobile usage will
continue to be the primary mode of transportation for many of the residents of, and visitors to,
Empire Lakes. Thus, the parking calculations for all non-residential, and residential
development that is comprised of 30 units (or less) per acre, will be based on the requirements
established in the City's Development Code. For residential development that is comprised of
30 units (or more) per acre, and which most likely will be within the Placetypes located near the
Metrolink station, the parking calculations will be based on the requirements in the Specific
Plan (Exhibit F). These requirements are not has high as they are in the Development Code
and have been created with the expectation that the residents within these Placetypes will use
modes of transportation other than automobiles and, therefore, the demand for parking spaces
for them will be reduced. For all proposals that are 1) within the Mixed Use Placetypes, 2)
within the Mixed Use Overlay (that are mixed use, i.e. have a combination of residential and
non-residential uses), and 3) are residential and have a density of 30 units (or more) per acre, a
parking study will be required to verify that the parking that is proposed will fulfill the parking
demand.
Respectfully submitted,
Candyce Burnett
Planning Director
CB:MS/Is
Exhibit A: - Vicinity Map
Exhibit B: - Conceptual Development Plan for Planning Area 1/Empire Lakes
Exhibit C: - Conceptual Design for The Vine (Plan View and Section)
Exhibit C: - Draft Development Program
Exhibit C: - Draft Architecture Standards
Exhibit C: - Draft Parking Requirements for Residential Development of 30+ du/acre
Item A-4
Hanning Areu 1
RANCHO CUCAMONGA IASP Sue-AREA 18 SpEciFic PLAN prr'll
Metro Unk Static ni
Area AA
91 fie-
J ¢ lsst�1 t� T']3n ivt 7
fj7
IS
L —:�t s
North
.,
South
P nning Planning
Avn VM A 1k
it
it
Planning
Arca 1A
Plan'"
A'V. IV 64 ac.
16 ac
It
planning
Axen v
ac
.in Mann
a V1
M 24
ac.
Note. Figme not to scale.
Figure 7.2: PAI Col
EXHIBIT A PuB-ic REV EN, DRAFT I OCTOBER 2015
Item A-5
Metrolink San Bernardino Line
i:•L �.;
il I, .;II ii,;i li'I ! Il i
Pocket Park
N-3 Metrolink
T ux Rancho
N-2 °°°°E"'" Cucamonga
N-1 UN N-12 Station
4.3 nc 21W WJAI MU
20.W VU/RC 30°E
asm uuAc
u N•12
MU
CL -`' 2xAo wfxc
73M U
tH9 W/°C P'2°'\ \N-IO\
2a 7N7A �
7th Street Sec .,Emn, t63SOVNc
•'�pi''r, d3, ecaeoPer 'Tm, 7th Street
REC
N.6
CL N_y
six
1919 UVAC
a 155EU/Ac
C
f#1 IN 8
WIY VNr
North 61d ,
-
„ Urban Plaza
6th Street
514 South
9.6AC -'Y��T`'f CL
1 39 DU/AC J <sS a(
lsvwnc
Pocket
15
Park VN j 546
trot 6VN 1
le lE OV/A[ ]
$21
% N
1 193C W/4C
VN / /
IorPc /
le 28 WIPf/
AVN/ Placetype Legend
1 99ac
Sd /xsxe ou/°c _ ITransit(T)
N Mixed Use(MU)
°E
I6xg nu/+c Urban Neighborhood(UN)
Core Living(CL)
Figure 7.6: Conceptual Sd9 Village Neighborhood(VN)
Development Pian by Mu kV Recreation(REC)
Placetype uaW/u MU Overlay
4th Street
EXHIBIT B cap,
Item A-6
\Hianning Area 1
M� -i
4
RANCHD CJCAMONGA IASP Sj3-AaeA 18 SorCFC Play.
Table Too
Pedestrian
Crossing
Ll
3rd Place Soace1 >-I 3rd 'lace
Plaza - `-,. •'- Sauce Plaza
I
,p� I
Grand Paseo Grand Paseo
i x
l
Pzsidenclol or Residential or
V fixed Use Overlog �. .. . Mixed Use Overlog
Develnomero Develoomenc
I..1
Tree Well q ' 4 -
Bu.=rlerea
Bike Lane
-� � 3rd Place
Gaz;herirg
Soace
.. . .1' --
7r�1 'In� Pedestrian
ri -r r Circulation
t Path
�I LDr
Y
rg� Metrolink
Station
I _ � llh Street
M �-p
t y
�l n
i' y �� 6th Soret
e �
t
V
ah s reet
Note: Figure not to scale. Figure 7.5: Cancept3ual Vine
EXHIBITC P R, DRAFT I _a 2015
Item A-7
0
Metrolink 1t
Station •
7th Street • -..Pi' P. 1; — ,. .
bthStreet to `f . . .Ir 1. r .i�.�. Sl)U, -..
4th Sheet
CYIIIP h'44 i H L-� COLUMNAR THEE
A.
-
StxC1E5 SFEcrs ��-
1
-rgYrG '
L�
r� I
I
/r/4 /4 ; It >rs 11 - 14 14 13',v-8' I1'-
A fi YJP-Er X10 -.f` >2'Fp ✓
_Yf(r] 'r
Curb co Curb /
---80' ------E
Street POW
Building w Building
Figure 7.21: The Vine Note: Figure not to scale.
MF -- -�■I►----- I
Empire Lakes
Item A-8
Planning Area
RANG110 OJCArnosr2A IASP Sjn-AaeA 18 S ro=,- P,au
lubls 7.1, FAI Uarela nient Program
Plocetypes Acresi'lim
TranO(T) 1.2 25.000' -
27 75,000 14-40 D 108
combined — - -- - --- ___
3.0 35-55 U lti3
I.Dod JUN( 20.1 - 24 80 A83 1,610
26.5 1635 475 926
1, .. -=,ad ('✓N) 13.5 - - -- 1683 -- - - 1 7 379
Ppie:.tiaSublota' 67.0 1 CO"0:)) - --1 7.5 -47.6 - -- 1,1 7', ---- 3,136
Net Developable Minimum
Required/Maximum Permitted 67.0 100,000 23.8-29.9 1,594 2,000
NonDevelolpoble IP.EC) 25 (4) - -
Uroc- R= 0.6 - - -
MWDEasemerlOS !.4
Roa=,J tM s-_OS 10.5 -
Nan Developable Subtatai 15.0 -
Gross Developable Minimum 82.0 100,000 19.4.24.4 1,594 2,000 Table notes:
Required/Maximum Permitted
of • (1) Exact acreage configuration, and
boundary lines subject to final design.
Minimum required units regulated by
Placetypes _ _ - - target units on a per parcel basis. See
•• •�- 77- 77 Implementation for parcel target
', ,- units, tracking, arid density transfers
r i Ike(MU) 3.0 35,000 14-40 120_ (2) Development of each parcel
r L:hg (CL,i 14.1 I8-3; _ - si may occur at any density within the
Jiap_N=ighb"rood (VPJ) 50.1 - 16Y , ;, established range; however, in no case
-- __ _ ___ __ ___ shall the total number of dwelling units
Px- t,a. S'blota: 67.2 35,00) 15.7 7 30.0 1 056 2,01 7 develo ed exceed the Gross PAI Total
Net DevelopableMinimum 6Z2 35,000 15.7-21.6 1,056 1,450 of 3,450 dwelling units.
Required/Maximum Permitted
(3) Development SF in the T Placetype
Non Developable was not included in the EIR analysis
Rerraotion (REQ 4.3 (4) _ - because it is adjacent to a Transit Station
--------- — - --- - ---- - - ---- --- ----- and provides Transit supportive uses.
Rcads/PAisc.OS 6.9 - - Therefore the 220,000 SF maximum is
P1on-Deveiopaole Sibicto' 11.2 - -(4) equivalent to the 195,000 SF in the EIR.
Gross Developable Minimum 78.4 35,000 13.5. 18.5 1,056 1,450 (4) Development square footage within
Required/Maximum Permitted the REC Placetype is for private use
.- by residents of PAI, not contributing
• to trip generation of the site, and is
•• Overlay - - therefore not subject to the square
footage maximum established by this
able or the applicable EIR traffic study.
Mixed Use (MU) - 85,000• Consistent with underlying Placetype Any non-residential use developed for
public access within the REC Placetype
• shall be subject to the 220,000 SF
• _ - J , maximum.
(5) Aggregate of all PAI non-residential
development, (excluding recreation
Net Development Total 134.2 220,000 19.7-25.7 2,650 3,450 area development within the REC
Gross PAI Total 160.4 220,000 16.5-21.5 2,650 3,450 Placetype), shall not exceed the
220,000 SF maximum.
EXHIBIT D F R_c .r, DRAFT IO2-oesa2015
Item A-9
Manning Area I
RA�c"o C'JCAMONGA IASP Sue-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PAN
7.4.9 Af-,c:h(,,ecL)-ut,o1 SU.jles
The mossinu, ch,-mic.tel and clet(i,liriy of or.,ncfutecUral sivle should
he exprcssivn of cud outhetit�( L, tk,it sfyks the o/le
(1pphe'l �vith fl'-'� I!IFY t:)
ri lo"m )It's of fifirliti,)'I'l� "-.It P-0111r,
Adaptive Prairie elevation
• Att [Ips
LFrtJi
i(Irl
• AA lin Sff-'."[
a mill-
0
Industrial elevation
sk
wl
Contemporary eIpv')tI0f'
EXHIBITE p R- DRL& 1 2015
Item A-10 M—
A PA,
GIe 1 rn ,yl a , omni chit to nru nlr� ul sat'in,� f hes<,
zc
s
yles cn� wd1--, 11 fed fol hlcgh:j-rl-��ty IF i i lflal hull 111 in miked
N
ne�,,ihb�rlr�•As I!it 61 :nd llu,lll- •> , industry arhl housing
)� log V, d,ml I 1 trt,itI .=, sii 11I:r,I:_,,r I (iit fmmn,
eh it 1 � ,i{) rr rtl:ri'tls I,r()1 -ti n r- r i : , ) {) •s If,e style;
:ml,l , ntel' it, nJ r'AIfli ;;Ilh t.ie, I In ) iliCII, u . ,1,it
�it� Dda, -11 z�? `- AIJi 1 Ir6, lu' Il e F-n -:tit-- su. Is i I I n-_I; k; it, I wJ h Mise.ccln
(J��c1 tl II v", �I17, 1 n.♦ ,l 1 (d,)ot, IttSJtL Sf)l, P`, r,l
�I ht-: r ,' ,r A-- 'til.(II a I:I 11-1 (nni it
y
m I111 .4IitI I) It,If
k J3r)lS) 1f1 f ,nrlI
VIA
11�
f ,
x� �� 1 ,�f fr�,l qE �.,�f. n iI v�-5• ri 7L1, r.Il,c lit SheCIS
.���r- f _ VP �d��F. ^.`• � ��,,711 Ilt,rt Ir il, t�.)I ,li/ ,.-lit
.':.I,
3.� �` � ' � .y � I .Io irli„qil rn-_,rt�., i,rlirl 'il,lrlkJf-r r, n : {
�'~sr . � c ho;o dirt ;rent vy tl mr” rk,l�
Wl
x i3,� _ .: ; � Fr I, I• , G,. 11 Ir t:1 �r� , � r„ 11nr,-I •
Ith llralrL.{ ,II r,rJr:F , u„T 11,g�
121ii
�lMpr,��4'�.:.• _ fir.
rf _ _�
Empire L
4a Item A-11
Hanning Area
RAV31,0 GY:AW)o J,A IASP S°.,e-AREA 18 SPEC'RC PAN
tr;=nti;: un;)
1 � . � 11 � I II 1�asonahiy
r_ a ialiw,( elevotic,ns
fo, the 1nteg, i'i-;n �3
1 �
p.
r
r " 1 in expie cion mixing traditional materials
with bold contemporary details
k yL� u
f: tF
S-,
D-,- -.1_ , Pr, ' , G,. __',e_ I P_ ,- _ R DRAFT I
Item A-12
Art Deco
rhe Hrt DP.CO Stye �IIIC UdIny Stf Billniifta r,I P.,t ,M,j<jeln9 �.(1 tBI jfl tills p.'fipd iafne JtrBUlTllil-_' OI Art Mnd?rn�'
bx=til MI, prpvt, t In Avner i, ;.: h"s' fl? Ir I 1 IJ)ni 11flUr.I1,HI I a"I�A�yIIUfTIIC [filh_Ii]d5 U1 Calb, (f(1116
rn.d 1940s This style' crnnbined elelr,<! In ' j, ships all-1 - )I;:,ehofd ,_IF;p I I I This style has an
With un lntegicitl011 I , .rrlro=:litz II - erflt�h(I�i � .: I , . ,. ;I, r v.e5 oife'n UC:.cni?d by
b.li I--,s ernphosl. Intl nsym,1'. tl lour 'II'It r.11 Clll v-' I . ,r 51 i 1-i It hr,t I I I `ACI IS lde_Of a fed
.flut_hNOI purity in f(Avaf of 1-)III'= ! !11,1 .:1 1..1 rk,,lhr ,-f wRn C. ed linen, wll dow;. :,I glass blor-k Thin
opp?nlfigs Art NI::r) buddings can feature bCld cJ,gTs. t1Jf1z0W'J' JI 4 t.z founded fnfrTI, IIId eV-'ll P'JfthOle
bold geometric.and rectilineal shupes, often ernphnsizing windowsre atqw al c harm lerYi- I rl�j elefnenis The
Ole venccul sinipie massing typnlogy of this style Is well-suited for
multi—frimily CWCJJIed and 111y11-dell',liy Hanes
jW Empire Lakes
Item A-13
Planning Area
RANCHO CUCAMONGA IASP Sue-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLA%
r
Elements Standards Enhancements
r -�+wad �.. • ^
f �
t P o
V V
m
m
o
0
v
• Flat roof with parapet walls
Roof Components • Tile or decorative accents along parapet
• Small ledge coping along top of parapet walls
Roof Materials • Consistent with overall design, as applicable
Roof Colors • Consistent with overall design, as applicable
Architectural • Square and rectangular forms highlighting • Narrow section rectangular steel columns OR round
Components vertical forms slender steel posts at entries, decks or at shade
devices
Wall Materials • Stucco
Wall Colors • Neutral to bold colors including whites and tints
• Decorative horizontal or vertical grooves, geometric
patterns
Trim & Details • Accent colors and/or materials highlighting • Stylized motifs as an accent just below the top of the
vertical forms parapet
• Belt fine running along the wall at a height even
with the top of a second story window header
Trim Colors • Contrasting neutral hues
• Large single-pane feature windows and corner • Transom window accents
Windows windows
• Horizontal window mullion patens
• Secondary vertical windows
Doors • Simple doors
Accent Colors • Bold, contemporary accents strategically applied
DEvE,OPMENT PIAN ANoGu,oE�NEs I PaR E v Ew DRAFT 10_-TC E3-_R 2015
Item A-14
omemporar-y
I �
)f dl,- building
s help
� i 'rpt r �, 1� I air• � ',t °� � i � 'I ;
r
7-86 Lakes
r�
Planning Area
R,v,,:Ho CUCAMONGA IASP SJa-ARIA 18 Spee ac RAN
} i
I 1 �
7
-' ON
k, :r
- ��,� .•.- .� y - -til r � �xr :� V'^'„
. �
• Accent roof element(sloping, hip OR gable, broad
Roof • Flat roof with parapet or shed roofs extended eaves, etc.)
Components . Simple unadorned parapet walls • Gable, hip OR shed forms
• Exaggerated accent roof forms
Roof Materials • Consistent with overall design, as applicable
Roof Colors • Consistent with overall design, as applicable
Architectural . Signature form, detail or feature • Architectural liberties are taken in interpretation &design
Components
Wall Materials • Stucco • Accents of metal, brick and/OR siding
Wall Colors • Contrasting form andi or material defining colors
Trim & Details • Minimal OR exaggerated window trim • Closed OR exposed eaves
Trim Colors • Contrasting traditional OR contemporary colors
Windows • Verticahy proportioned, stacked or purposely
unbalanced placement
Doors - Rectangular, highlighted as primary feature of
elevation
Accent Color • Contrasting traditional OR contemporary colors
DRo onviev P.A�i A,,T1 G sE_'r= I Pus_ _ R ;v. DRAFT I O_roeeR 2015
Item A-16
Industrial
oils
go OF
ley
r,. ■ r
��•�0 v
post r
■
`t'e= IndustnaI stq!e has evolvad from the Ifni--o acd an addlticn t�� th� h udding A00octun tl elaments such
tTOS❑i.. _b lr1r Jnr{rj,ji ii ll �ll��f)ai tic5 tllt0 dyfiU rYll`- ati um it tlh (or],Ps c1nd tielh.s<-, , wbe appended
I, , L -,i n: r !,i .tI 1:,4i serf. •;, 1 he syle to rhe volume -i: ;vvriy irdr,nr,'ontd��(,i spaces t(, be
'rtlli"- 1[H UII 4Jln2il fJlfl i.,dotal=d Wlth matell:]S� �crtiI and hcJrlZOntal PPITIr'111b prOvde Inte165t
K)r fnd.JUi ' Out(l'Ur '!vinq The to tl e r,,,denrral structures. Thr' roofs may he hat %Mth
st-yle emph f-iz,� tiny vo iir-. with a cnllage nI parapet, of comhlnatiun of both Vdmdow,
C-i�.yr; rll;�l fnUrRna�� Tyfnt ()Ily th; C'�f'�ufi� fa5(n volunLe G ;k)[ "d hie pia-ed in rtieUs to o,/atlook co nvv areas
C7 r;�e� �I/i tl� thF UDpeOlan<_F;Of rB.Identla� hUl�t UI'�av': !]s a,_I If CreCIs2 sufve 1,iwe tUr tlir=jc areas
-
Empire Lakes
Item A-17
Planning Area
RANCHO CUCAMONGA. IASP Sue-AREA 18 S-FaFiC PLAN
00
ti it
A 't
• Accent roof features as appropriate
Roof • Flat roof with parapet walls • Signature towers OR vertical projections can extend
above roof line
Components • Simple unadorned OR detailed parapet walls
• Cantilevered projections
• Roof decks
Roof Materials • Consistent with overall design, as applicable
Roof Colors • Consistent with overall design, as applicable
• Projections OR wall planes articulate facade
Architectural • Projections OR horizontal banding between floors
Components ' Utilitarian and "edgy"
• Simple, unadorned forms • Asymmetrical facade
• Stucco, metal OR fiber cement siding • Brick OR stone veneer
Wall Materials - Metal accents
• Contrasting wall materials and textures
• Concrete OR gloss
Wall Colors • Contrasting form and/or material defining colors
• Metal awnings OR overhangs
Trim & Details • Color blocking as appropriate • Metal, cable, gloss OR panel balcony railings
• Sunshades
Trim Colors • Contrasting neutral tones
• Simple industrial dark window trim
• Minimal trim • Larger window modules
Windows
• Repetitive mullions • Long ribbons of windows
• Nontraditional window shapes and placements
Doors • Understated • Roll-up doors
• Store front
Accent Colors • Bold, contemporary hues
D-v__ P_N4Al,;G_Ds_ir.sI Pue_ic R_vFw DRAFT I OCTOBER 2015
Item A-18
CraPGsman
*1W
01 ,
��• F rf Q31. ..
,If �
i
.u1011 IIIA,
IIII 11• 1 Il;
Infiu,ncad fly the English Arls rn iais m,- c.=ot of[lie The wo rl working craft defines this st; by :,jfr.-fully
late 19th century and sPy ized by C.cllltamia orci;ited-such treating dekids,such us windows and prrches Exposed
as Bemard Moybeck in Berkeley and the Greene hrott,eu rcket tails and kn-e braces balow overhanging°rives and
in PoSodHnd, the Gaftsm)in style stresses the irnp_)rtance rustif--trxtuied buildnly materials ur.- chuructel defining
of insoI Ing drat oil exterior and inlei tor elen-snts receive features Substantial tapered porch columns with stupe
iJotfl trlstF'fUl(lnrf C1rrUl (lf?Gnhi)n Orlginntlfl i in Ii.I piers Iern� a Greene character AI,ile i plef d",Utile
Claftsman eli-n;rv; the simpl=, bojse naditi,_al, on bri.-k pieis and argar knx brar.t-s make a
omhining h,p and d,)hie f,uf f.x r,,. o.-A, , rile I. )rchF-s Craftsman distinctly murr Ma/bad The overall effect
I I e' � ] ? tf r rind r lP r
UI1C 1 ,ui( OV..Iha ni �I'Ir� ei V_s I: Ic C!oatlOn Of a natU(a 4i,Jrrr; 1 I tlbJb„ f;+Inc ai
awful and ehpresswe character
Empire wakes
Item A-19
Manning Area I r
F
RA%rHO CuCAMON GA IASP Sue-AREA 18 S-eaE c Pars
g F • .�3 =
Elements Standards Enhancements
s
■ �1,
'f Jnr
• Side-to-side gable with cross gables OR
combination hip and gable forms OR flat roof with • Extended eaves at accent features
Roof parapet walls
Components • Shaped rafter tails preferred
• Exposed rafter tails at prominent locations • Outlookers and brackets
• Bargeboard and rafter tails at gable ends, where used
Roof Materials • Flat, shake concrete tile OR asphalt shingles
Roof Colors • Medium to dark value browns, greens and earthy red hues
Architectural • Heavy "timber" columns
Components ' Porches OR covered entry OP,defined entry
• Post& beams
Wall Materials • Medium sand float stucco finish (16/20) • Shingle siding OR board&batten OR brick OR stone
• Horizontal siding accents
Wall Colors • Medium light to medium dark value earth related tones of brown, rust, olive green and ochre
Gable end details
• Tapered OR double-post porch columns on brick OR
Trim & Details • Appropriately sized columns (where used) stone piers
• Shutters
• Pot shelves
Trim Colors • Toned whites in light to medium light value range and brown shades in medium to dark value range
• Vertically proportioned windows • Grouped windows with continuous head trim
Windows • Window grids • Vertical windows at first floor
• Fully trimmed windows • Horizontal windows at 2nd floor along bell course
• Paneled front entry doors • Front entry wood and gloss doors
Doors
• Paneled garage doors • Garage doors with windows
Accent Colors • Earthy, warm hues, medium to dark value, including green, rust and burgundy tones
DECE_opvE,c P-AN AVD G,DE_NES I P.e_ ; R E DRAFT I O-ToeER 2015
Item A-20
European Heritage
, s
17 �711 !1
MEN
4, t
%
_ —
�a 1
ii
,I^
Y
:J.
I
p �
s ... 1
t74 :t
y
n I d .. 1 L i i, rind Itr7h,in hdes that were
:.� _l ri, --If, ,I !,-, 1 ; ,l-I 1 1 ,I't ,l ❑ .hl:•1 ,., 1 F" ." 1•i:. IY �I Cgjblic. hLllldlllg and GhUrch
r-,-;,_.�leauiun,. lhlsEuropean 11 r't,b{= I. I 1.. 1 fl'Ie Interpleklhon o hq itipnal
r-1 c_„ the stylization of suppler English 1 Enrthsh hu; resultod in uniquely Amencan
ri lm ;itl,x1s that Cr11ne t0 Ame,lra l,. - „ All of tho!i e s� Ie5 ty ically Include staepe--r
h I � lernents OtId wore reel, 1 lilt framlrnj with t,IrrlplP form ,
I ll dthy Amoiicnnl usa ; I I c4 and to.,ve1 elensnh ineunt
to ii r,l
Empire Cafes
Item A-21
Planning Area I
RANCHO CJCAMONGA IASP Ste-ARBA 18 SPEr Fir PLAN
ri
I
A 1) n z
• — rabr ,�r ,` r
Elements a
Rt' "t t
•- .>v , .•...�. :gra
Standards Enhonc
• Main roof hip OR gable with intersecting gable
roofs OR flat roof with parapet OR mansards
Roof • American: Dormers
Components Gable end OR parapet details
• French & English: tight rakes • French & English: Curved slope at roofline
• American: standard rakes
Roof Materials • Flat concrete slate file
Roof Colors • Cool tones of natural slate
• Traditional pediment at entry
Architectural . Porches OR covered OR defined entries • Tower element
Components
• bay windows
Wall • American: Siding accents (horizontal OR vertical)
Materials • Medium sand float stucco finish (16/20)
• French & English: Stone OR brick accents
Wall Colors • Medium light to medium value subdued hues of taupe, warm gray, yellow and green and warm-toned whites
• Metal details
• Appropriately sized and minimally detailed • American: Fully trimmed windows with projecting sills
Trim & Details columns
• French & English: Plank shutters
• Details to create a thick wall look
Trim Colors • Warm tones of gray, blue-gray, brown and gray-green in medium to dark value
Windows • Window grids on all upper levels Dormer windows
• Window grids on all windows
• Paneled front entry doors
Doors
• Paneled garage door with windows
Accent Colors • Muted shades of blue, green, gray and red in medium to medium dark value
DEV; oPWV P-AN A'ID G�10i`,!NrS I P,e_.c R-, w DRAFT I O�TDBER 2015
Item A-22
Italian
*
4 F
Y 1
I
I I
i I �
I _
I
�i
) r r
WIT
J -4
I Ile IT,1 m Style i5 n p evarnple at a ransplanted this styf= As It 6.-.Gime a pop alar building matc4lal, wrought
style da,aluped in o c lime"e zone similar to tha Soathem iron expunded the Itolion style vocabulary to include a
Colilornio chmote In the 1 'do0s tfie Itandn Villa was voriaty of embellished designs for porches, balconies,
one of the foshiJnnf)Ie orchlls",turol style: in the United railings and fences-
States bosed on the formal and synlrnet,ical palaces of
An cltf-shoot of this style, Itallanate, ernaryed In the «>w
thl-, Italian Rcr,nissance Italia: homa; -ire shaightl.;,r-word
houses of San Francisco with crmplifie:d Itl.ylian Rrnoisanee
tvsd boxy stiith only wind,wv aowrib and c oinl-e molt iql
chasnraerlstks including the emphass an use of classic
as Ol hl7 rrlentatlOrl
Roman oldels in columns, dec-m-rove mohveS along the
Tins old wodd protr,ypn ho b --n [chi,e -trJa,;tcd i."d exagyeroter{ ine and piojecting boy windows
embelhshed into a holy ecle tjr nlossi- style The shoJaav undal hip roofs
t*cfind hippryl roof oft-ii with d�xcwiwre brackets. Idr,ntifies
Empire Lakes
W46�1'1111
Item A-23
Manning Area
RANCHO CUCAMON A IASP S,S-An-A 18 S _ - P,
a � t
INA
��"S'- Ids
S �f'
i
Roof • Main hip roof with hip ancillary roofs OR flat roof • Closed/shaped eave with corbels at accent
Components with parapets or mansards and cornice elements elements
Roof Materials • "S•' concrete file • Barrel tile
Roof Colors • Hues of terra cotta OR other natural clay roof tile colors
Architectural . Precast surrounds • Medallions
Components
Wall Materials • Medium sand float stucco finish (16/20) • Brick OR stone accents
Wall Colors • Medium to medium dark value saturated colors in earth tones, especially yellow, orange and red
• Formal entry with smooth stucco trim
• Window and door trim • Cast stone surrounds, precast trim
Trim 8,Details - Simulated precast columns of entry OR between
• Horizontal belt course windows
• Base trim
Trim Colors • Wood trim in medium dark to dark value browns; precast concrete trim in medium light value, warm toned
whites
• Arched, round top, OR pedimented accent windows . Paneled OR louvered shutters on accent window
at selected locations
Windows • Grid patterned at front and visible windows
• Symmetrically ordered and stacked windows and
openings • Recessed windows
• Entries detailed with precast surround feature
Doors • Paneled front entry doors • Garage doors with windows
• Paneled garage doors
Accent Colors • Vibrant shades of medium dark to dark value blues, greens, oranges and reds
D-c- P—av ANS� I Pja_lc RE -w DRAFT 1 Oc-oAFa 2015
Item A-24
Main S[,reet
!
y i• . aRw :w e.e..�n 'l
In the I9th century lypiujl Muin Street alchitaCture was level was dorninnted by large windows framed by the
oWlt as a sin_tio budding (,l in of buildings with building's �.oiners anis the pnnel of 61 i( k kehveen hoors
o(Pfy wrills 6lir f 'tole fr")(OS r PJ(I :'.Xtell!I Up tll iU HOCI,, The Lit)t)er evais st�matirnay included single of JouNe bny
n length These 1)00-11119S varied In hoight `f- ,m onr to windows, f)ri(:k hiele., panels and de .or16ve cornices
duee. ur moro <,turies In urban settings, this styli was ofhel, Qthel options in�- lade the use of comi,ed poropets,
OU;�gj!ed by id bi!slrle`S r, he (IrOund flocir and OfflCes. CrOrltluous Gills r)r IIIG?IS Clnd 5t!Ing al belt
atr1Thne11ts o1 o•nnei s reAi! C, abrrve type((Al' tim cou yesdividinq the wallIr tr 4!l The r om!c,e fun, n_wed
budding ha,.J n tripolnte olgani;•atior. of hose, midJe and as a mp ;n( _)! wh .:h t r ! L--mants wort arr mgsd and
top Entrances were I•;cateJ on or of[center The lover lb, h-nced
■ - :---
Empire Fakes
Item A-25
Hanning Area
R,,% i,C r-nvr,;an IASP S -A<=n 1E S,r P,A,-,
"c.
` M
,y. mg. p �
Elements
y
Standards Fnhancements
• Flat roof with parapet
Roof • Decorative cornice detail that unified the facade OR
Components • Accent roof forms OR projecting awnings provides variety
encouraged
Roof Materials • Consistent with overall design
Roof Colors • Consistent with or accenting overall design
• Simple box, multi-story 'storefront' form with accent. • Multiple building heights created by varied parapets
elements at entries and cornice design
Arch • Recessed doorways, tower elements OR applied • Balconies
Componentsectural architectural accents at entries • Colonnade
Components
• Tripartite organization of base middle and top . Raised stoop
through use of horizontal belt course, change in
material or massing offset • Horizontal modulation of about 25'
Wall Materials • Stucco with accent materials (siding. brick veneer,
metal, scored stucco in accent color, etc.)
Wall Colors • Neutral and accented colors appropriate to the materials used
Trim & Details • Awning OR projecting feature accenting overall • Features borrowed from traditional American main
design streets, appropriate to scale and massing of building
Trim Colors • Neutral hues may blend or contrast per context
• Vertical, may be single OR multi-paned on upper . Projecting OR angled awnings at any level
stories, often grouped
Windows • Pedimented windows at ground level
• Large single-paned OR vertical multi-paned on
ground floor • Transoms
Doors • Monumented with massing, architectural. OR awnings-design consistent with overall theme
Accent Colors Contrasting neutral or bold tones as appropriate
DEVE_o�w=_a, P..A'� A^o G.11E_'%E< I Pue..c R=v eNv DRAFT I OC Ceea 2015
Item A-26
4;
Mryl Ulit '�
1T •;
jt 1
7-98
Empire
Lcikes
Planning Area (
RANCHO GJCAMONGA ]ASP S.JB-AREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN
F
E�ements Standards Enhancements
3
{ a
Y
♦v
1
Roof • Simple roofs of hips OR gables OR flat roof with • Parapets with barrel tile cap
Components parapet walls • Rafter tails, shaped tails preferred
Roof Materials • Concrete "S" file OR flu!concrete shake the OR
asphalt shingles
Roof Colors • "S" the in hues of terra cotta OR other natural clay colors
• Shake tile in natural wood tones
Architectural • Balconies cantilevered OR supported
Components . Simple wood beams at balcony
• Medium sand float stucco finish (16/20) • Brick OR slump block on first floor at main entrance
Wall Materials . • Board and battens OR horizontal siding at upper
Material change at second floor, typical level
Wall Colors • Light to medium value warm colors and toned whites
• Stucco-wrapped, high density foam trim with
fine sand float stucco finish (20/30) OR smooth . Well-placed and proportional entry light fixture
Trim & Details manufactured foam trim
• Wood (or simulated wood products)OR metal
• Closed OR exposed eaves railing
• Plank-style shutters on feature windows
Trim Colors • Medium to dark value browns reminiscent of stained woods OR toned whites
• Vertically proportioned windows with simple
Windows minimal trim
• Typically rectangular, arches discouraged
Doors • Rectangular openings,with simulated precast
surrounds OR header
Accent Colors • Muted tones of medium to dark value blue, green, rust OR burgundy and dark browns
DEbEUOPMEN' P�-AN AND GJIDE_'NES I PueL�c REo Eur DRAFT I OCTDBER 2015
Item A-28
,
i
�i 1 ink � � �-' �� •�� �i \� t.. � � .�» � t,, v`i
i
7-100
„ ' Lke.c,
Planninq At,ea
RANCHO CUCAUONCiA IASP S 18 SPEC:FIC PLAN
I-
Elements
t
I
I
'N1 ,
Standards Enhancements
Roof
Components . Hip roof typical OR flat roof with parapet walls Wider overhangs (24") at prominent locations
Roof Materials • flat concrete slate the
Roof Colors • Warm, earthy colors including reds, oranges, greens and browns
• Strong massing OR design features that accentuate
Architectural horizontal
Components
• Porches OR stoop entries
• Medium sand float stucco finish (16/20)
Wall Materials • Brick base accents
• Horizontal siding OR brick accents
Wall Colors • Worm colors in light to medium value range
Trim & Details • Horizontal belt course Gable end details
• Appropriately scaled columns _ Tapered OR double-post porch columns on brick piers
Trim Colors • Medium dark to dark value range warm colors or toned whites
• Banded or grouped windows
Windows • Strong unifying head OR sill on grouped windows
• Vertically proportioned windows
• Paneled front entry door
Doors • Garage door with windows
• Paneled garage door
Accent Colors • Earthy, medium to dark value range colors including greens, oranges. reds and browns
DEaE_OPnENT P_AV ANDGJDEUNES l P,je_-: Rsi =_w DRAFT OCTOBER 2015
Item A-30
I
4 ; CY �� N+
lip
f(f fF.s 1'dbIC''. fe
!Ir I.,
f Empire Lakes
`' Item A-31
Manning Area I
R','. ,D ,A IASP S_e-Aa,A 18 P,.AN
i).'�' ` `..• '�t a
Apt !
.. Vf
f
Elements
7 r f rr
• Mor s Enhancements
Roof • Hip OR gable roofs OR flat roof with parapet walls • Parapets with barrel tile caps
Components . Tight rake, where used • Rafter tails, shaped tails preferred
Roof Materials • Concrete "S" tile • Barrel file
Roof Colors • Hues of terra cotta OR other natural clay color
• Round top OR arched primary window OR . Shed roof accent feature
Architectural orchitectural feature
Components
• Recessed openings at front entry OR porch • Porches, balconies OR verandas
Wall Materials • Medium sand float stucco finish (16 20) • Decorative ceramic tile OR brick accents
Wall Color • Toned whites and light to medium light value warm colors
> Stucco wrapped, high density foam trim with
fine sand float stucco finish (20'30) OR smooth • Closed OR exposed eaves
manufactured foam trim • Wood beam accents. especially at porch
Trim & Details . Gable end tile details
• Wall mounted light fixtures at garage door
• Decorative metal elements (pot shelf. gate, • Well-placed and proportional entry light fixtures
balcony, etc.)
Trim Colors • Medium dark value browns reminiscent of stained wood
Windows • Vertically proportioned windows • Divided lights
• Recessed feature windows • Round top windows
• Front entry doors without a porch, deeply recessed from front facade
Doors
• Rectangular OR arched surrounds (following door design)
Accent Colors • Clear to muted blues, greens, rust and burgundy in medium to dark value range OR dark browns
Dwe_oPm,,, P-P,ANc G,ee_�;_s I Pia- C REV ew DRAFT I OcT:)e�R 2015
Item A-32
This page intentionally left blank.
Empire Lakes
Item A-33
f� hs�ll 111Il'.ti I I 'r it t'F'I I1t-:I 11
R`-'.°,I(��U tri rl I I `.F'I )p" t.} 7 i 1 It_ /i Y.I F'( �. .%1 fr'Ub'll" Ilii I' 1'i!� [r) i Jrl r'vVi'- ttlp )I .fir 7rnnl ii)ri4:i
eq��iied by fable 17 (,4 `) 0 1 ` ^h; Cih D�rai.�p 11 _) pc kin;) redo �.�r; ar, f1 nlr7ed ��iui�nt t�
the f>c�vi,io": � -reg„
'lr� `nr-C71..lit !iii1 Li'S tij Lrtr''1 r'if>L= 17640,50-1 sh,Ill
jt".- 7 7, Pq,: I (? � purl-iiia titD
VVl .. h:� - 7 ��'7 p"� f ;), ..1 r 1",Z I:"114i11 .. ., c , 1, Pl 11 ,..t. i. . 1 - i!n ilF ,,Car
StiGil f;P 'O'Jn 1---"1 � ., - ' ° =.P.. � :.� � -: Il n•L,�
cable 7.7; Parking ke uitenients
Standard Residential Development of 30 du/ccre or less
Required Unit Parking Table 17.64.050-1 of the City Development Code
EmpireLakes
Stardard
I Residential Development>30 clui MU/Mixed Use Overlay
Required Unit Parkingel Sinrequiremlents;r ee Section 3.5iC Parking Moon-street
d f cation/Reduction for parkingdmodifisatisfy
ions.
Studio T
1 Bedrooms 1.3 spaces,'unit, (may be an enclosed space) 1 space/unit, Inlay be an enclosed space)
2 Bedrooms
--
------- 3 Bedrooms j _ . . - ---- --- - - - - ----- - --- ---
4 or More Bedrooms 2 spaces,/unit(with 1 enclosed space) 1.5 spaces/unit(with 1 enclosed space)
- Live/Work Units' j As required based on bedroom count Varies - -
Shopkeeper Unit As required based on bedroom count * Varies
----- — t- -- - --- ---- - - - --.
- - ---- -
Age-Qualified/Senior Units i space;unit
Required Guest Pakini
Residential ', 1 space/4 units T 1 space/5 units'"'
Live/Work 1 space/2 units
Shopkeeper 1.5 spaces/unit
Age-Qualifie&Senior Units _ 1 space/10 units
- Bicycle - Residential None Per CALGreen standards where applicable
Bicycle Non-Residential Per CALGreen standard
Minimum Parking Space Size and Driveway .- • and Z30 units/acre)
Single-Car Garage' - 10 feet x 19 feet
Two-Car Side-by-Side Garage 19 feet x 19 feet
Two-Car Tandem Garage 10 feet x 39 feet(permitted if both spaces are assigned to the same unit)
Standard Head-In Space faet x 18 feet; 16 foot depth permitted with 2-foot planting area overhang, OR 17-fool depth
permitted with 1-foot planting area overhang
Parallel Space 8 feet x 22 feet
Driveway Depth/Setback From Private Drive Aisle or Alley
to Garage Door (as measured from back of ROM
Residential _ 2.5 feet or>18 feet 2-5 feet or>18 feet
Tandem garage parking counts as 2 parking spaces for all residential densities and mixed use configurations.
Guestparking space location is not limited to dwelling unit proximity per City Development Code; actual distance to be
reviewed by the City.
Maximum 2 steps permitted within minimum garage dimension.
EXHIBIT F -npire �t _
Item A-34