The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019-09-25 Agenda Packet - PC-HPC SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 1 of 4 A. 7:00 P.M. – CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Guglielmo _____ Vice Chairman Wimberly _____ Commissioner Dopp _____ Commissioner Munoz _____ Commissioner Oaxaca _____ B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of August 28, 2019. (September 11th meeting was canceled.) SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 2 of 4 D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00564– RICHLAND COMMUNITIES – A request for a one (1) year time extension for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908—The subdivision of approximately 10.6 acres into 30 single-family detached lots within the Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda North Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Wilson Avenue – APN: 1087-081-25. D2. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM (Owner Amy Crow) – A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 3,030 square foot single-family residence with an attached 866 square foot garage on a 20,000 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, the Hillside Overlay, and the Equestrian Overlay at 5034 Via Verde – APN: 1061-201-09. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER-AGENCY UPDATES: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 3 of 4 If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. F. ADJOURNMENT I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 19, 2019, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker’s podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “Public Comments.” There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 4 of 4 All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission’s decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk’s Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2019 D1: TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00564 D2: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 D2 D1 AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 1 of 10 A. 7:00 P.M. – CALL TO ORDER 7:00pm Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Guglielmo __x____ Vice Chairman Wimberly __x____ Commissioner Dopp __x____ Commissioner Munoz __x____ Commissioner Oaxaca __x____ Additional Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager; Brian Sandona, Senior Civil Engineer; Jennifer Camacho-Curtis, Communications Manager; Nicole Dalton, Communications Coordinator; David Eoff, Senior Planner; Rob Ball, Fire Marshall; Jason Welday, Engineering Director; Valerie Victorino, Executive Assistant; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Chairman Guglielmo opened the public communications. Seeing none, closed. AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 2 of 10 C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. C2. Consideration to adopt the Regular Meeting Minutes of August 14, 2019. Consideration to adopt Adjourned Meeting (Workshop) Minutes of August 14, 2019 Moved by Wimberly, second by Dopp; carried 4-0-1, Oaxaca abstain. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015- 00749, ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2015-00750, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2015-00752, ETIWANDA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD AND CONSERVATION PLAN (EHNCP) SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2015-00751, ANNEXATION DRC2015-00732, AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2019-00459 – CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CONTINUED FROM JULY 24, 2019. Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager, gave the Staff Report and Power Point presentation (copy on file). Commissioner Dopp asked staff to elaborate on the changes to the TDR program. Mr. Burris explained that the TDR credit ratio was increased to encourage master developers to engage with property owners within the rural conservation area to move development units AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 3 of 10 to the neighborhood area from the rural conservation area. Property owners within the rural conservation area will ultimately have the choice to sell their development rights or develop privately on their own. Commissioner Dopp asked for clarification on the flooding issues in Deer Creek and Day Creek. Tony Locacciato, Meridian Consulting, stated that the CEQA analysis evaluated the flood, performance and maintenance data of those basins provided by the County and determined that they are quite adequate to handle flood debris. Chairman Guglielmo asked about the expansion of the retail uses in the commercial area, specifically medical uses in the upstairs units only. Mr. Burris explained that to maintain fiscal neutrality, it was important to permit retail uses which provide sales tax support while allowing other service-based uses without compromising the ability to maintain and support retail uses. Mr. Burris further explained that second story uses could be elevator served. Nick Ghirelli stated that all projects would be required to meet ADA accessibility standards. Chairman Guglielmo stated that he would prefer not to see vacant space. Chairman Guglielmo asked if these uses could be permitted on the ground floor with a CUP. Commissioner Dopp asked about the types of retail uses in the plan. Mr. Burris explained the types of retail and service uses within the City. Commissioner Dopp asked about the translocation of plants. Mr. Locacciato explained how plant species can be relocated. Tony Maricic stated he owns property up in the conservation area. Expressed concern that the City has not engaged the owners of the properties within the conservation area, the lack of a circulation plan for the conservation area, and the 200 acre kangaroo rat habitat. Stated AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 4 of 10 that the City and County have prevented property owners from getting to their property for maintenance. Judy Brennan stated opposition to the project. Risking loss of trust in the City. Any home north of Banyan was supposed to be half acre. Does not believe the plan will be followed. Concerned that trails will not be constructed and does not have accurate trail connections from east to west. Trails are needed for equestrian uses as well as evacuation. Don Horvatich expressed his concern that the community plan doesn’t match the surrounding area, and the desire for no retail in the area. Sami Muller asked how strongly is the conservation area designated and for how long? Is the housing proposed going to look like what is in the plan? William Gibson is concerned about the number of cars and the traffic impacts between Day Creek and Milliken. Asked about the impacts to schools. Mark Gibboney is opposed to the plan because the idea of open space was not evaluated. The community was not part of the 2017 plan. Stated Federal agencies recommend conservation of the land. Does not like the small lot development. Community asked for large lots only. The plan is a done deal – public wasn’t asked. Alexander Cunningham expressed he represents the area east of preserve to Fontana City limits – 400 acres. Planning Department met with us to address compatibility. Confused with the transfer of development rights. Likes rural life and don’t understand why they need to be brought into the City. They don’t fit. Mary Linden Keith mentioned she is opposed to the plan because this is the Deer Creek Wash. 80 foot gorilla above the wash. Homes already there should not be there. Should not add more homes. Concerned about flood impacts of Deer Creek. Chairman Guglielmo closed public communications and asked staff to respond to comments Mr. Burris available for questions: Responses from Staff - AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 5 of 10 Outreach – One of the most extensive the City has every embarked upon. Multiple workshops in multiple parts of the city, social media, electronic and in person. The City tried to bring a broad and wide balanced perspective to the Commission for consideration. The City reached out to land owners in the rural area, as well. Fiscal responsibility – Focus is on the financial burden on the City. For example; fire, police and public services. Low property tax city, retail needed to supplement funds needed to support civic services. Conservation land – How long? Designed to be set up forever, provides for an endowment for lands to be managed in perpetuity. Architectural styles - Craftsman, Spanish, Mid Century and Ranch, similar to surrounding areas. Traffic - Thoroughly detailed in the EIR, found that adding another east-west road north of the 210 will help alleviate pressure on Banyan. Plan anticipates another new K-8 school on Wilson to divert traffic from Banyan. Plan should have been open space. Considered this in great detail. Cost was estimated at over $100 million. There is no revenue stream available to fund. Balance community vision, property rights and fiscal responsibility. Water supply assessment was provided by CVWD and found adequate water supplies, conservation is mandated by the State. Commissioner Oaxaca commented on Flood Control and is hoping to see in the documents in response to comments. Reference to documents from various regulatory agencies related to flood control – gap for him – unable to square historical documents with justifications in the final EIR. What is the relevance of the historical documents? Are they wrong? Out of date? Improvements made over the year changed factors? Would have liked a side-by-side comparison of historical documents and FEIR conclusions. Similar concerns with fire danger. If historical documents are relevant, how are they being addressed? AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 6 of 10 Mr. Burris responded to help in navigating documents – 2003 Grand Prix Fire – able to take bad fire and water storm and test the flood control facilities. Basins are not dams, not intended to hold water. Intended to contain debris and to keep it out of channels. Help to understand that the levy has been certified by FEMA. Is a diversion mechanism to help direct flows into the channel. Systems has been tested many times over. Staff visited the site many times during and after significant rain storm to understand how the infrastructure worked during and after a rain storm. Water virtually not on the site because everything is working as it should. Flood District did an amazing job and spent millions of dollars to protect our downstream neighborhoods. Mr. Locacciato explained some of the changes made to the areas by the Army Corps of Engineers and Flood Control Channel. Commissioner Oaxaca asked about the role of the property owners in the LAFCO decision making process. Mr. Ghirelli and Mr. Burris provided a brief explanation of the LAFCO process and after LAFCO approved an annexation, with an ability for protest vote. Commissioner Wimberly asked about outreach with property owners within the conservation area and if enough outreach has been done. Mr. Burris explained that we have reached out to many property owners and residents, with some response. We continue to initiate conversations throughout the process. Commissioner Dopp asked if outreach is still available to interested parties and could changes be made necessary before City Council. Mr. Burris said yes, conversations can and will be ongoing throughout the process. Chairman Guglielmo offered each commissioner time to comment. Commissioner Dopp stated that the City has done a lot of outreach and provided data to support it. Feels that annexation allows for local control that was supported by outreach data. While some may not agree with all parts of the project, it is important that people feel heard. Preserving as much of the conservation area as important for the long term. Properties AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 7 of 10 change and development desires change over time. This plan is the best opportunity to allow for some development and preserve out open space. Commissioner Dopp further stated he understands the concern about traffic. Agrees that adding another east-west access may help alleviate traffic along Banyan and Vintage. Is happy to see buffers with the adjacent residential community. Wonders if the TDR option will work. Understands the need for commercial uses. Recognizes that while half acre homes are nice, we must think of the long term and the cost and availability of housing for the next generations. The City has done their best to make a plan that is the most palatable to most residents. Commissioner Oaxaca thanked staff and the team for the efforts to date to develop the plan and reach out to the community and listen to that input. Notes two points from public: 1. Apply local control; 2. Maximize the area that can be conserved. Conservation takes resources to prevent the area from deteriorating. This plan allows us to create the resources to make the conservation happen. Commissioner Oaxaca recognized the traffic concerns brought up by the public. Feels that the completion of Wilson Avenue will help. The goal is to bring the best possible plan to meet the most needs of those who have a current and future stake in Rancho Cucamonga. Commissioner Wimberly thanked staff for their work and believes that this is the best plan for the future of the City. Concurs with Commissioners Dopp and Oaxaca. Wants to make sure that the TDR ratios support conservation. Commissioner Munoz thanked public for coming out to participate in the process. Understands that not all may agree with the plan, but it is the Commissions job to look at the long term. Plan is comprehensive, thorough and allows for local control, addresses conservation of the open space and connected the plan to the General Plan while maintaining fiscal responsibility. Glad to see the addition of roadway segments that will alleviate stress during school pick up and drop off times. Pleased with the expansion of the trails network, architectural styles and development standards. Supports the plan. Chairman Guglielmo thanked the public for their participation. Goal is to look at the overall view of the City and decide what is best for the City as a whole. Believes in private property rights and empathetic to those that may not agree. We have an unbelievable city and we have an opportunity to make it even better. The plan creates additional trails and parks which we AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 8 of 10 have been wanting for a long time. Concessions have been made by the City which resulted in reduced development and increased conservation land. Agrees with many of the points made by fellow commissioners. Moved by Munoz, seconded by Wimberly; carried 5 -0 -0. G. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION INTER-AGENCY UPDATES: Commissioner Wimberly announced that requests for proposals are available for the PC Academy COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: Commissioner Dopp welcomed new Planning Director Anne McIntosh H. ADJOURNMENT Adjourned at 9:33 I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 22, 2019, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 9 of 10 If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker’s podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “Public Comments.” There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. AUGUST 28, 2019 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Page 10 of 10 APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission’s decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk’s Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00564– RICHLAND COMMUNITIES – A request for a one (1) year time extension for a previously approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908—The subdivision of approximately 10.6 acres into 30 single- family detached lots within the Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda North Specific Plan located at the northwest corner of East Avenue and Wilson Avenue – APN: 1087-081-25. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a one (1) year Time Extension DRC2019-00564 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site consists of approximately 10.6 acres of undeveloped land located northwest of the intersection of East Avenue and Wilson Avenue. The rectangular subject parcel has a linear dimension, from north to south, of approximately 659 feet and approximately 662 feet from east to west. The project site is covered with ornamental grasses and gravel. The subject property is within the Low (L) Residential District. The site is surrounded by vacant land in all directions. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designation for this project site and surrounding properties are as follows: DATE: September 25, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Low Residential (2.0-4.0 Dwelling Units Per Acre) Low Residential (L) District Etiwanda North Specific Plan Equestrian Overlay District North Vacant Low Residential (2.0-4.0 Dwelling Units Per Acre) Low Residential (L) District Etiwanda North Specific Plan South Vacant Very Low Residential (Up to 2.0 Dwelling Units Per Acre) Very Low Residential (VL) District Etiwanda Specific Plan Equestrian Overlay District East Vacant Very Low Residential (Up to 2.0 Dwelling Units Per Acre) Very Low Residential (VL) District Etiwanda North Specific Plan Equestrian Overlay District West Vacant Low Residential (2.0-4.0 Dwelling Units Per Acre) Low Residential (L) District Etiwanda North Specific Plan Equestrian Overlay District PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00564 – RICHLAND COMMUNITIES September 25, 2019 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The subdivision will have two points of access, one along the future extension of Wilson Avenue and one along the future extension of East Avenue. The design of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the surrounding residential subdivisions within the area. The proposed 30 lots will be developed in accordance with the Low Residential District, Etiwanda North Specific Plan standards. The Application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTTM18908 by one additional year. Upon the initial approval of SUBTTM18908 on September 28, 2016, the approval period was for a duration of 3 years and was set to expire on September 28, 2019. A breakdown of the approval history of the subject tentative tract map is as follows: Tentative Tract Map 18908 Approving Authority Approval/Extension Type Approval Period Approval Date Expiration Date Planning Commission Initial Approval (PC Reso 16-48) 3 Years Sept 28, 2016 Sept 28, 2019 Planning Commission Proposed Time Extension DRC2019- 00564 1 Year Sept 25, 2019 Sept 25, 2020 (proposed) ANALYSIS: Subdivision Map: Municipal Code Section 16.20.100 (Extensions) states that tentative parcel maps may be extended for a time period not exceeding 2 years. The municipal code requires that a request for a time extension be submitted not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date. The applicant submitted a letter (Exhibit B) on July 29, 2019, stating a one (1) year extension is necessary to allow time for the completion of environmental permits with the US Army Corps of Engineers and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Flexibility with the 60-day submittal period has been afforded to applicants in the past who were unaware of the submittal time limit. This application involves a 1-year time extension request, which would set the expiration date to September 25, 2020. If approved, the applicant will have the opportunity to apply for one additional time extension request. Public Art: This subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension is exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code as the project is not tied to any developments. However, public art will be required once the architectural drawings have been submitted to the Planning Department. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on September 28, 2016 in connection with the City’s approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00564 – RICHLAND COMMUNITIES September 25, 2019 Page 3 important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. The applicant submitted a Biological Resource Memorandum (ESA Consulting; April 29, 2019) which reviewed whether changes have occurred on the project site that would necessitate new or different mitigation measures. The report concluded that no substantial changes have occurred on the project site that would necessitate new or modified mitigation measures. The report also concluded that the recommended mitigation measures that were detailed in the 2002 Biological Resource Assessment is consistent with the site conditions that were observed in early 2019. Staff has evaluated Time Extension DRC2019-00564 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, nor have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The applicant has not proposed any changes to the originally approved entitlements. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City’s consideration of Time Extension DRC2019-00564. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City’s annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the application, the proposed map extension for 30 single-family detached homes will enhance the premier community status by adding additional housing which will increase the City’s housing supply. This project is also consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code as the General Plan land use and zoning designations of the project site are Low Residential and the subdivision is for residential purposes. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00564 – RICHLAND COMMUNITIES September 25, 2019 Page 4 EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Time Extension Request Letter dated August 5, 2019 (updated) Exhibit C - Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 28, 2016, related Conditions of Approval, and related Resolution of Approval. Exhibit D - Resolution 19-57 - Recommendation Approval of Time Extension DRC2019-00564 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00564 – RICHLAND COMMUNITIES September 25, 2019 Page 5 SITE AERIAL Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C RESOLUTION NO. 19-57 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00564, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18908, A SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATLEY 10.6 ACRES INTO 30 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED LOTS WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST AVENUE AND WILSONE AVENUS; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 1087-081-25. A. Recitals. 1. Richland Communities, Inc. filed an application a time extension to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On September 28, 2016, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 16-48, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On September 25, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing for the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. On September 25, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a one (1) year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908, extending the approval period to September 25, 2020. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on September 25, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 10.6-acre rectangular-shaped parcel of land located on the northwest corner of East Avenue and Wilson Avenue with a linear dimension, from north to south, of approximately 659 feet and a linear dimension, from east to west of approximately 662 feet and is presently undeveloped; and b. The site is surrounded by vacant land in all directions. The zoning of the subject property and the properties to the north and west are Low (L) Residential District and the Etiwanda Exhibit D PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-57 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00564 – RICHLAND COMMUNITIES, INC. September 25, 2019 Page 2 North Specific Plan, while the zoning of the properties to the east and south are Very low (VL) Residential District and Etiwanda Specific Plan; and c. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards of the Development Code for the Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda North Specific Plan; and d. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908 for one (1) additional year. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the completion of environmental permits with the US Army Corps of Engineers and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, Municipal Code, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is for the subdivision of 10.6 acres of land for 30 single-family detached lots development. The project site is within the Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, which permits the development of single-family projects with a density of maximum 4 dwelling units per acre. The approved 30-unit single-family development on the project site has a density of approximately 2.83 dwelling units per acres; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. Currently the site is undeveloped. The project involves grading of the site to comply with City requirements and to be consistent with previously approved tract maps within the vicinity of the subject property; and c. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision complies with all development standards outlined in the Development Code for single-family projects within the Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda North Specific Plan, including density, setbacks and design; and e. The time extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on September 28, 2016, in connection with the City’s approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908. Pursuant to PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-57 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00564 – RICHLAND COMMUNITIES, INC. September 25, 2019 Page 3 CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. In April of 2019, a biological resource update letter was submitted as part of the request for the previous one (1) year time extension request. The April 2019 letter states that no substantial changes have occurred on the project site that would necessitate new or modified mitigation measures. The report also concluded that the recommended mitigation measures that were detailed in the 2002 Biological Resource Assessment is consistent with the site conditions that were observed in early 2019. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. c. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City’s consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18908 is September 25, 2020. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 07-59 for SUBTT18908 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2019-00564. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-57 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00564 – RICHLAND COMMUNITIES, INC. September 25, 2019 Page 4 I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of September 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: STAFF REPORT RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Hillside Design Review DRC2018-01013 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is a 20,000 square foot vacant parcel located on the west side of Via Verde Street and north of Almond Street, within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay, and the Equestrian Overlay. The property dimensions are approximately 200 feet along the north property line, 100 feet along the east property line, 100 feet along the west property line, and 200 feet along the south property line. The lot slopes downwards from the street and with an elevation of approximately 2,185 feet as measured at the curb face along the east property line and an elevation of approximately 2,158 feet as measured along the west property line. This creates an elevation change of approximately 27 feet from the east to the west property+ lines. Street improvements such as a sidewalk, curb, and gutter exist along Via Verde Street, but street trees and parkway landscaping need to be installed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay North Single-Family Residence Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay DATE: September 25, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM – A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 3,030 square foot single- family residence with an attached 866 square foot garage on a 20,000 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, the Hillside Overlay, and the Equestrian Overlay at 5034 Via Verde Street – APN: 1061-201-09. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM September 25, 2019 Page 2 South Single-Family Residence Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay East Single-Family Residence Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay West Single-Family Residence Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay ANALYSIS: A. Project Overview: The Applicant, on behalf of his client, proposes to construct a 3,030 square foot, two-story, single-family residence on the project site. The project complies with all the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay, and Equestrian Overlay. The maximum lot coverage is 25%. The proposed lot coverage is approximately 14.5%. The proposed grading includes up to 6’-11” of fill and 5’-3” of cut, which necessitates approval by the Planning Commission (5 foot max cut or fill for Planning Director approval). Architecture: The proposed residence has a contemporary ranch style design theme, that includes a standing seam metal roof, smooth stucco finish, cluttered stone siding, titanium vinyl siding, and balcony glass railings. The architectural design of the residence incorporates variations in the roof height to interrupt the wall plane at the rear and the front elevations. The three-car garage is located underneath the southern portion of the first story of the residence, with the garage door facing east and accessible by a driveway with a 10% grade. The building mass is visually reduced through multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the west elevation. The residence will be painted earth tone colors in compliance with Section 17.122.020.D.2. The proposed residence consists of two levels. The first level is approximately 2,886 square feet and consists of the main living area, 3-car garage, dining area, and a covered porch at the entrance of the residence. The second level is approximately 1,080 square feet and consists of the remaining living area with decks around the rear portion of the residence. The size of the 3,030 square foot residence is in keeping with homes constructed along Via Verde Street, which range in size from 1,951 square feet to 5,317 square feet. B. Very Low Residential District Code Compliance: The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) District. The required development standards are as follows: Setbacks Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 42’ 42’ Interior Side Yards 10’ / 15’ 10’ / 18’ Rear Yard 60’ 96’ Lot Coverage 25% Max 14.5% Building Height 30’ limit within the Hillside Overlay 26’-1” PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM September 25, 2019 Page 3 C. Design Committee Review: The project was presented to the Design Review Committee (Wimberly and Munoz) on August 6, 2019. The Design Review Committee accepted the design of the project as proposed without revisions and recommended that the project be moved forward to the Planning Commission for review (Exhibit D). D. Hillside Design Requirements and Code Compliance: The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The project site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 13 feet from the north to the south property lines and 27 feet from east and west property lines. The maximum height of the house is 26 feet overall as measured from finished grade. Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.C requires that houses in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30 foot high building envelope. E. Grading: The proposed grading plan indicates there will be 179 cubic yards of cut and 213 cubic yards of fill from the project site. The design limits earthwork to 34 cubic yards of import, which most of the import is necessary to allow the construction of the driveway and foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 2,188 feet and the lower grade pad at an elevation of 2,175 feet. This is in conformance with the Hillside Overlay Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., which requires the building to follow the slope. F. View Analysis: The Development Code does not include a requirement to preserve views, however, the applicant has increased the side yard setbacks to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding the lot and to minimize view obstructions. G. Building Envelope Analysis: Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.e requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30 foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north-south and two east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30 foot height requirement. H. Retaining Walls: The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay per Section 17.12.020, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3 foot separation between the stepped walls. No retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet. The proposed walls are in keeping with the Hillside Design Guideline Section 17.122.020.E., having walls that integrate the materials and colors used on the residence. I. Landscape: The proposed front yard landscaping is designed to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., which requires new development to include the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The proposed front landscaping complies with the front yard landscape requirements, by minimizing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area. The proposed front yard landscaping also meets the criteria of the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) and does not exceed the maximum applied water allowance (MAWA) as required by Section 17.82.020. All vegetation will be designed and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) for sites located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) and in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM September 25, 2019 Page 4 J. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 –– New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Section 15303 allows for the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The proposed project is a single-family residence on a single lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay, and Equestrian Overlay, and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. K. The residence meets all applicable development standards and zoning regulations of the Development Code. Therefore, staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. L. Public Art: This project is exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. The proposed project is a single-family residence. Residential projects with a density equal to or less than four dwelling units per acre are exempt from the public art requirement. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City’s annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages infill development that facilitates sustainable and attractive development that complements the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single-family residence is of similar scale and size to that of the surrounding neighborhood, and the land use and lot dimensions are in compliance with the Development Code. The contemporary design of the residence complements the eclectic architectural styles in the neighborhood. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 foot radius of the project site. No comments were received in response to these notifications. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM September 25, 2019 Page 5 EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Aerial Exhibit B - Architectural Plans Exhibit C - Grading Plans Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Action Comments (August 6, 2019) Exhibit E - Resolution 19-58 – Recommendation Approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2018-01013 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM September 25, 2019 Page 6 SITE AERIAL Exhibit A 30.00' 30.00' 2160 2181.04 2164.15 2188.26 2188.23 2188.872189.102185.78 2185.32 2185.792185.67 2185.00 2185.16 2181.81 2181.74 2182.38 2182.212182.36 2182.422179.17 2178.562179.262178.09 2174.80 2 1 7 4.7 5 2175.25 2175.71 2175.712 1 7 4 . 2 8 2173.76 2171.57 2178.41 2181.44 2184.21 2187.312183.99 2180.52 2172.382169.81 2181.25 2181.182180.212177.95 2169.85 2168.95 2167.33 2169.18 2172.94 2175.53 2175.88 2178.422176.44 2171.65 2170.24 2168.43 2164.52 2163.292158.34 2159.49 2158.78 2159.95 2156.672154.95 2156.54 2165.31 2168.11 2168.612165.75 2165.49 2164.26 2163.44 2163.44 2153.482153.86 2 1 6 3 .3 2 2163.11 2162.94 2 1 6 3 .3 7 2156.25 2156.16 2158.742153.64 2153.83 2156.65 2159.04 2156.40 2156.26 2159.03 2159.01 2161.45 2161.46 2163.52 2163.66 2164.12 2164.18 2161.71 2162.79 2161.66 2159.11 2159.38 2163.24 X 1X2HUBT FSNGNGFS NG NGFS FS FS NG NGNG FSNG NG NGFS FS NG NG FSNG NG NG NG NG NGNG NG NG NG TPNG NG NG NGNG NG NG NG NG NG TP FS NG NG NG NG NGNG NG NG NG NGNG NG NG NG NGNG NG NG TREE 56 NG TWFSTW NG NG N G TW NG NGFS FS TW TW FS FS TW NG NG NG NG NG NG NG TW TW NG SWALE FS FS TW 10 13 1519 24 2831 3439 4043 44 4546 49 5255 57 5862 71 72 74 75 76 7780 85 9599 106 110 111112 113 114 115 116 117 123 124 128 129 130 132 133134 135 136 137 139140 141 142 143 144153 154 155 156 157 158160161 1 6 5 166 167 1 6 8 170 171 172 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 191 192 193 196 UPUPN 00°14'13" E 683.00'2182.32 FS TC 16 33 5 4 UP1.STORM WATER DRAINAGE/ RETENTION DURING CONSTRUCTION: PROJECTS WHICH DISTURB LESS THAN ONE ACRE OF SOIL SHALL MANAGESTORM WATER DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:A) RETENTION BASINS.B)WHERE STORM WATER IS CONVEYED TO A PUBLIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM, WATER SHALL BE FILTERED BY USE OF A BARRIER SYSTEM,WATTLE OR OTHER APPROVED METHOD.2. GRADING AND PAVING: THE SIDE GRADING OR DRAINAGE SYSTEM WILL MANAGE ALL SURFACE WATER FLOWS TO KEEP WATER FROMENTERING BUILDINGS (SWALES, WATER COLLECTION, FRENCH DRAINS, ETC.)3.INDOOR WATER USE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING TABLEFIXTURE FLOW RATES:oFIXTURE TYPE MAXIMUM FLOW RATEoWATER CLOSETS 1.28GPFoSHOWERHEADS 2GPM @ 60 PSIoLAVATORY FAUCETS 1.5 GPM @ 60 PSIoKITCHEN FAUCETS 1.8 GPM @ 60 PSIoMETERING FAUCETS 0.25 GALLONS PER CYCLEoLAVATORY FAUCETS SHALL NOT HAVE A FLOW RATE LESS THAN 0.8 GPM @ 20PSI4.LANDSCAPE IRRIGATION WATER USE SHALL HAVE EITHER WEATHER OR SOIL BASED CONTROLLERS5.RECYCLING: MIN OF 50 % OF CONSTRUCTION WASTE IS TO BE RECYCLED6. RECYCLING: CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A CONSTRUCTION WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO THE JURISDICTION AGENCY THAT REGULATESWASTE MANAGEMENT.7. OPERATION AND MAINTAINANCE MANUAL: THE BUILDER IS TO PROVIDE AN OPERATION MANUAL (CONTAINING INFO FOR MAINTAININGAPPLIANCES, ETC.) FOR THE OWNER AT THE TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION.8. POLLUTANT CONTROL: DURING CONSTRUCTION, ENDS OF DUCT OPENINGS ARE TO BE SEALED, AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS TO BECOVERED.9. POLLUTANT CONTROL: VOC’S MUST COMPLY WITH THE LIMITATIONLISTED IN SECTION 4.504.3 AND TABLES 4.504.2, 4.504.3 AND 4.504.5 FORADHESIVES, PAINTS AND COATINGS, CARPET AND COMPOSITION WOOD PRODUCTS.10.INTERIOR MOISTURE CONTROL: THE MOISTURE CONTENT OF WOOD SHALL NOT EXCEED 19% BEFORE IT IS ENCLOSED IN CONSTRUCTION.THE MOISTURE CONTENT NEEDS TO BE CERTIFIED BY ONE OF 3 METHODS SPECIFIED IN SECTION 1.505.3. BUILDING MATERIALS WITH VISIBLESIGNS OF WATER DAMAGE SHOULD NOT BE USED IN CONSTRUCTION. THE MOISTURE CONTENT MUST BE DETERMINED BY CONTRACTOR BY ONE OFTHE METHODS LISTED IN CGC 4.505.312.INDOOR AIR QUALITY: BATHROOM FANS SHALL BE ENERGY STAR RATED, VENTED DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE AND CONTROLLED BY AHUMIDISTAT.13. PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION THE LICENSED CONTRACTOR, ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF OVERALL CONSTRUCTIONMUST PROVIDE TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL WRITTEN VERIFICATION THAT ALL APPLICABLE PROVISIONS FROM THE GREEN BUILDINGSTANDARDS CODE HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED AS PART OF THE CONSTRUCTION.VIA VERDEMIN 42' FRONT SB TO CURB42'-1 1/4"34'-0 3/4"33'-11 1/2"17'-0"SIDE SB10'-0"25'-7"42'-0"28'-0"30'-0"30'-0"4'-0"8'-0"200.00'100.00'200.00'100.00'113'-0 3/4"30'-0" FRONT SETBACK 30'-0"10'-0"MIN SIDE SB15'-0"MIN REAR SETBACK 60'-0"75'-0"2182' - 0"2184' - 6"2177' - 10"2174' - 10"2172' - 10"2177' - 4"9.9%10%10%18'-0"25'-0"47'-0"10'-0"1%1%775 SQ FTUNCOVERED PATIO115 SQ FTUNCOVEREDBALCONY @ 2NDFLOOR70 SQ FTUNCOVERED PATIO150 SQ FTUNCOVERED PATIO5'-0"12'-6 1/2"35'-11 1/2"9'-0"24'-4"34'-3 1/4"27'-10"16'-0"21'-10 3/4"96'-4 3/4"1,950 SQ FTLIVING AREA@ 1ST FLOOR866 SQ FTGARAGE1,200 SQ FTCONC. DRIVEWAY(E.) CONC.WALKWAYPROPOSEDLOCATION OFELEC. METERPROPOSEDLOCATION OFELEC. METERNATIVEPLANTSLANDSCAPE2178.00 FF2175.00 FF2178.00 FF2182.00 FF2173.00 FF1,080 SQ FTLIVING AREA@ 2ND FLOOR70 SQ FTCOVERED ENTRYPORCHNATIVEPLANTSLANDSCAPE5'-0"PROPOSED DRIVEWAYAPPROACH AND APRONP.U.E. 15'-0" SBCDE 10'-0" S.B.C.D.E. 20'-0"TELEPHONECOMPANY (P.U.E.)4'-0"3'-0"INSTALL 4'X4'RIP RAP(SEE GRADINGPLANS)(E.) CHANNELEDISON COMPANY(P.U.E.)18'-0"3'-0"12'-0"3'-0"20'-0"GRADE LVL 2,182'-2"ARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.A R C H I T E C T U R E+ E N G I N E E R I N GRAMY IBRAHIMARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+Cramartoo@yahoo.com714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DR.EASTVALE, CA 92880www.artoodesigns2dio.comLICENSEDARCHITEC T S T ATE OFCALIFORNIARNo. C 37222Ren. 09/30/19MAMYIBRAH I RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT.NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURED:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvt3/31/2019 9:51:49 PM3/31/2019 9:51:49 PM3/31/2019 9:51:49 PM3/31/2019 9:51:49 PMA-1Site PlanProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow18072510 DEC. 20185034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701Sequence Of Drawings# DescriptionA-1 Site PlanA-2 1ST Floor PlanA-3 2ND Floor PlanA-4 3D ViewsA-5 ElevationsA-6 ElevationsA-7 SectionsA-8 SectionsA-9 Section & Roof PlanC-1 Title & NotesC-2 Grading PlanC-3 SectionsC-4 SectionsC-5 Wall PlanC-6 Cut & Fill ExhibitS-1 Topo SurveyProject InformationOWNER: AMY CROW909.239.3839PROJECT ADDRESS: 5034 VIA VERDEALTA LOMA, CA 91701CONTACT:ARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.ARCHITECT:RAMY IBRAHIM714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DREASTVALE CA 92880RAMARTOO@YAHOO.COMBuilding DataAPN:1061-201-09PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 14 OF TRACK NO. 7596 BOOK 100 PAGE 77 & 78ZONING:R - VLOCCUPANCY:R-3/UCONSTRUCTION:V-BFIRE SPRINKLERS:REQUIRED (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) THE BUILDING SHALL BE EQUIPPEDWITH AUTOMATIC RESIDENTIAL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCEWITH SECTION R313.3 OR NFPA13D. (R313,12.21A17(d))BUILDING HT30' MAX PER HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STDSPROJECT DESCRIPTION:NEW TWO STORY 3,030 SQ FT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE AND 866 SQ FTATTACHED GARAGEGeneral NotesNumber Note1 LUMBER SHALL BE GRADE STAMPED AND CONFORM TO THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM STANDARDS:A) STRUCTURAL LUMBER TO BE WEST COAST DOUG FIR NO. 2 OR BETTER (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) THIS INCLUDES BEAMS, HEADERS,BLOCKING, DIAGONALBRACES, PLATFORMS, STRINGERS, JOISTS, RAFTERS AND POSTS. (BEAMS 4 x 12 AND LARGER TO BE DOUG FIR #1 &BTR.)B) STUDS MAY BE "CONSTRUCTION GRADE" DOUGLAS FIR OR #1 & BETTER.C) TOP PLATES MAY BE "CONSTRUCTION GRADE" HEM FIR OR DOUGLAS FIR.D) SILL PLATES IN CONTACT WITH CONCRETE SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED "WOLMANIZED" OR FOUNDATION GRADE REDWOOD2 STRUCTURAL CONNECTOR REFERENCES ARE TO "SIMPSON STRONG-TIE" CONNECTORS. I.C.C. APPROVED3 NO STRUCTURAL MEMBER SHALL BE SERIOUSLY WEAKENED OR IMPAIRED BY CUTTING OR NOTCHING4 CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CALIFORNIA MODIFIED VERSION (TITLE 24, 2015EDITION) OF THE FOLLOWING CODES:2016 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, (2015 IBC)2016 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE, (2015 UPC)2016 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE, (2015 UMC)2016 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (2015 NEC)2016 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE, (2015 IFC).2016 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE)HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE (HSC), SECTION 13145CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR)TITLE 24ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS5 DRAINAGE PIPING IN THE GROUND SHALL BE LAID ON A FIRM BED FOR ITS ENTIRE LENGTH AND BACKFILLED IN THIN LAYERS TO 12" ABOVETOP OF PIPE WITH CLEAN EARTH, FREE FROM STONES AND BOULDERS. DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3” DIAMETER WITH 2% MIN.SLOPE.6OFFSET PLUMBING OUT OF BEARING FOOTINGS.7FIXTURES, DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE CEC REGULATIONS.8THE MANUFACTURED WINDOWS SHALL HAVE A LABEL ATTACHED CERTIFIED BY THE NATIONAL FENESTRATION RATING COUNCIL (NFRC)AND SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS.9APPROVAL OF THESE PLANS BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT DOES NOT INCLUDE APPROVAL FOR ANY TYPE OF ALARM SYSTEM THAT MAYBE SHOWN OR REQUIRED. SEPARATE APPROVALS FOR ANY ALARM SYSTEMS MUST BE OBTAINED.10 ALL STEEL REINFORCEMENT TO COMPLY WITH ASTM-615, GRADE 40 AND 6013 SURFACE WATER WILL DRAIN AWAY FROM BUILDING, AND THE GRADE SHALL FALL A MINIMUM OF 6" WITHIN THE FIRST 10'. SECTION401.3.Green Building Standards:AREA ANALYSIS:SITE STATICS:TOTAL LOT AREA:20,000SF100%BLDG FOOTPRINT2,886SF14.5%PERMAEABLE PAVED CONC(DRIVEWAY, PATIO SLAB)2,195SF11.0%LANDSCAPE & PERVIOUS AREA14,919SF74.5%TOTAL FOOT PRINT1,950 + 866 + 70 =2,886SFLOT COVERAGE14.5% 1" = 10'-0"Vicinity Map 3/32" = 1'-0"Site PlanBUILDING STATICS:1ST FLOOR:LIVING AREA1,950SFGARAGE866SFCOVERED ENTRY PORCH70SFUNCOVERED PATIOS995SF2ND FLOOR:LIVING AREA1,080SFUNCOVERED TERRACES115SFTOTAL LIVING SPACES3,030SFTOTAL PATIOS & TERRACES 1,110SFProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow5034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701Exhibit B UPUPUPREF.UPUPDNUPWD10'-0"75'-0"15'-0"16'-0"18'-0"23'-6 1/2"6'-6"13'-5"12'-6 1/2"9'-0"7'-0"12'-6"13'-0"4'-6 1/2"11'-5 1/2"ABCDEG4'-0"8'-0"4'-0"15'-0"17'-11 1/2"4'-0"4'-6"22'-0"9'-6"4' - 0"10' - 0"109876543212178' - 0"2175' - 0"2182' - 0"2'-5 3/4"2'-0 1/2"6'-10"2'-0 1/2"2'-7 1/4"9'-10 3/4"1 1/2"3'-0"3'-6"2'-6"3'-6"3'-4"5'-8"2173' - 0"6'-6"11'-6"13'-6"5'-6"12'-11 1/2"9'-0 1/2"3'-6"9'-0"7'-0"10'-0"EQEQF1'-7 1/4"34'-0"9'-11 1/2"4'-0"6'-0 1/2"142 SFOFFICE44 SFPOWDER627 SF3 CAR GARAGE/KITCHENTILE 8' - 0"/FAMILY/ REC ROOM14' - 0"6'-9"2'-2"12'-0"2'-0"/M. BEDROOM #1/W.I.C./ENTRY LOBBY/DINING24'-4"16'-0"28'-4"3'-6"3'-10"3'-6"3'-10"19'-6"15'-0"/M. BATH #16'-6"4'-6"2'-0 1/2"15'-6"4'-6"12'-0"8'-11 1/2"10'-0 1/2"5'-3"3'-8"3'-4"4' - 0"3'-8"3'-8"22'-5 1/2"13'-11 1/2"2177' - 10"2178' - 0"2182' - 0"2178' - 0"2178' - 0"2175' - 0"2173' - 0"2175' - 0"2175' - 0"2173' - 0"2172' - 10"2181' - 10"2182' - 0"2177' - 4"8'-6 3/4"2172' - 10"2176' - 8"6'-10"6'-10"PANTRY34'-0"4'-0"SIDE SETBACK15'-0"11'-11 1/2"11'-7"97 SFLAUNDRY11AA-718'-0"8'-0"8'-0"BA-7CA-8DA-8EA-9ARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.A R C H I T E C T U R E+ E N G I N E E R I N GRAMY IBRAHIMARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+Cramartoo@yahoo.com714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DR.EASTVALE, CA 92880www.artoodesigns2dio.comLICENSEDARCHITEC T S T ATE OFCALIFORNIARNo. C 37222Ren. 09/30/19MAMYIBRAH I RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT.NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURED:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvt3/31/2019 9:51:51 PM3/31/2019 9:51:51 PM3/31/2019 9:51:51 PM3/31/2019 9:51:51 PMA-21ST Floor PlanProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow18072510 DEC. 20185034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701 1/4" = 1'-0"1st Floor Floor Plan - Proposed REF.DNWDABCDEG1098765432110' - 0"7' - 5"4' - 0"4' - 1"13' - 6"4' - 1"4' - 0"7' - 5"4' - 0"23' - 7"18' - 0"6' - 0"13' - 0"14' - 0"F12' - 0"9' - 0"10' - 1"14' - 0"6' - 1"8'-0"8'-0"OPEN TO BELOW/M. BEDROOM #2/M. BEDROOM #3/W.I.C./M. BATH #3HALLWAY/M. BATH #216'-0"12'-6 1/2"13'-5"1'-7 1/2"13'-5"1'-7 1/2"7' - 5"5'-7"3'-6 1/2"4'-5 1/2"4'-0"4:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:123' - 0"6' - 6"BALCONY16' - 0"11AA-71'-10"1'-10"BA-7CA-8DA-8EA-9ARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.A R C H I T E C T U R E+ E N G I N E E R I N GRAMY IBRAHIMARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+Cramartoo@yahoo.com714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DR.EASTVALE, CA 92880www.artoodesigns2dio.comLICENSEDARCHITEC T S T ATE OFCALIFORNIARNo. C 37222Ren. 09/30/19MAMYIBRAH I RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT.NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURED:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvt3/31/2019 9:51:52 PM3/31/2019 9:51:52 PM3/31/2019 9:51:52 PM3/31/2019 9:51:52 PMA-32ND Floor PlanProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow18072510 DEC. 20185034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701 1/4" = 1'-0"2nd Floor Plan - Proposed ARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.A R C H I T E C T U R E+ E N G I N E E R I N GRAMY IBRAHIMARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+Cramartoo@yahoo.com714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DR.EASTVALE, CA 92880www.artoodesigns2dio.comLICENSEDARCHITEC T S T ATE OFCALIFORNIARNo. C 37222Ren. 09/30/19MAMYIBRAH I RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT.NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURED:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvt3/31/2019 9:52:00 PM3/31/2019 9:52:00 PM3/31/2019 9:52:00 PM3/31/2019 9:52:00 PMA-43D ViewsProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow18072510 DEC. 20185034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701 1st Floor - L2178' - 0"T.P. 22197' - 2"T.P. 12187' - 1"2ND LEVEL2188' - 1"ABCDEGGarage2175' - 0"1st Floor - H2182' - 0"F9'-1"9'-1"15'-0"45° 00' 00"26'-0 3/4"15'-8 3/4"19'-6"23'-3"10'-0"PL18'-1 1/2"15'-0"45° 00' 00"30'-0"30'-0"AA-7111224129104115103949107731112815'-0"BA-71st Floor - L2178' - 0"T.P. 22197' - 2"T.P. 12187' - 1"2ND LEVEL2188' - 1"ABCDEGGarage2175' - 0"1st Floor - H2182' - 0"FPLPL28'-9"22'-0 3/4"15'-0"45° 00' 00"15'-0"10'-0"18'-1 1/2"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"AA-7118622694415'-0"BA-7CA-81.P-2090 - THUNDER SKY STUCCO2.P-100 - GLACIER WHITE STUCCO3.P-1661 - TITANIUM VINYL SIDING4.VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS5.WOOD & GLASS ENTRY DOOR6.BALCONY GLASS RAILING7.METAL & GLASS GARAGE DOOR8.LIGHT FIXTURE9.CULTURED STONE10.GABLE VENT11.MUSKET BROWN STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF.12.RAIN GUTTERARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.A R C H I T E C T U R E+ E N G I N E E R I N GRAMY IBRAHIMARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+Cramartoo@yahoo.com714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DR.EASTVALE, CA 92880www.artoodesigns2dio.comLICENSEDARCHITEC T S T ATE OFCALIFORNIARNo. C 37222Ren. 09/30/19MAMYIBRAH I RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT.NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURED:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvt3/31/2019 9:52:05 PM3/31/2019 9:52:05 PM3/31/2019 9:52:05 PM3/31/2019 9:52:05 PMA-5ElevationsProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow18072510 DEC. 20185034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701 1/4" = 1'-0"East/ Front Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"West/ Rear ElevationElevation Material Legend 1st Floor - L2178' - 0"T.P. 22197' - 2"T.P. 12187' - 1"2ND LEVEL2188' - 1"10987654321Garage2175' - 0"1st Floor - H2182' - 0"9'-1"9'-1"1130'-0"15'-0"15'-0"45° 00' 00"45° 00' 00"30'-0"30'-0"30'-0"321112398646621681211606060603040DA-8EA-91st Floor - L2178' - 0"T.P. 22197' - 2"T.P. 12187' - 1"2ND LEVEL2188' - 1"10987654321Garage2175' - 0"1st Floor - H2182' - 0"1130'-0"PL45° 00' 00"18'-11"9'-6"30'-0"30'-0"211126146DA-8EA-915'-0"15'-0"15'-0"2182' - 2"2197' - 2"1.P-2090 - THUNDER SKY STUCCO2.P-100 - GLACIER WHITE STUCCO3.P-1661 - TITANIUM VINYL SIDING4.VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS5.WOOD & GLASS ENTRY DOOR6.BALCONY GLASS RAILING7.METAL & GLASS GARAGE DOOR8.LIGHT FIXTURE9.CULTURED STONE10.GABLE VENT11.MUSKET BROWN STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF.12.RAIN GUTTERARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.A R C H I T E C T U R E+ E N G I N E E R I N GRAMY IBRAHIMARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+Cramartoo@yahoo.com714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DR.EASTVALE, CA 92880www.artoodesigns2dio.comLICENSEDARCHITEC T S T ATE OFCALIFORNIARNo. C 37222Ren. 09/30/19MAMYIBRAH I RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT.NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURED:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvt3/31/2019 9:52:10 PM3/31/2019 9:52:10 PM3/31/2019 9:52:10 PM3/31/2019 9:52:10 PMA-6ElevationsProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow18072510 DEC. 20185034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701 1/4" = 1'-0"South/ Side Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0"North/ Side ElevationElevation Material Legend 1st Floor - L2178' - 0"T.P. 22197' - 2"T.P. 12187' - 1"Grade2173' - 6"2ND LEVEL2188' - 1"10987654321ROOF LVL2202' - 0 5/32"Garage2175' - 0"1st Floor - H2182' - 0"1115'-0"45° 00' 00"PL30'-0"/ENTRY LOBBY9'-1"9'-1"15'-2"21'-10 3/4"4124123'-0"3' - 7"3' - 6"3' - 6"30'-0"30' - 0"DA-8EA-91st Floor - L2178' - 0"T.P. 22197' - 2"T.P. 12187' - 1"Grade2173' - 6"2ND LEVEL2188' - 1"10987654321ROOF LVL2202' - 0 5/32"Garage2175' - 0"1st Floor - H2182' - 0"1115'-0"45° 00' 00"30'-0"30'-0"/FAMILY/ REC ROOM14' - 0"/LAUNDRY/3 CAR GARAGE10'-0"14'-1"12'-1"PL30'-0"FINISHED GRADE30'-0"EXISTING GRADE30'-0"19'-6"DA-8EA-9ARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.A R C H I T E C T U R E+ E N G I N E E R I N GRAMY IBRAHIMARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+Cramartoo@yahoo.com714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DR.EASTVALE, CA 92880www.artoodesigns2dio.comLICENSEDARCHITEC T S T ATE OFCALIFORNIARNo. C 37222Ren. 09/30/19MAMYIBRAH I RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT.NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURED:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvt3/31/2019 9:52:11 PM3/31/2019 9:52:11 PM3/31/2019 9:52:11 PM3/31/2019 9:52:11 PMA-7SectionsProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow18072510 DEC. 20185034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701 1/4" = 1'-0"Section A 1/4" = 1'-0"Section B 1st Floor - L2178' - 0"T.P. 22197' - 2"T.P. 12187' - 1"Grade2173' - 6"2ND LEVEL2188' - 1"10987654321ROOF LVL2202' - 0 5/32"Garage2175' - 0"1st Floor - H2182' - 0"11/M. BATH #1/TOILET/M. BEDROOM #1/W.I.C./ENTRY LOBBY/M. BEDROOM #2PLFRONT SETBACK30'-0"15'-0"30'-0"30'-0"DA-8EA-91st Floor - L2178' - 0"T.P. 22197' - 2"T.P. 12187' - 1"Grade2173' - 6"2ND LEVEL2188' - 1"ABCDEGROOF LVL2202' - 0 5/32"Garage2175' - 0"1st Floor - H2182' - 0"FAA-7BA-7CA-815'-0"45° 00' 00"30'-0"SIDE SETBACK15'-0"PL30'-0"15'-0"10'-0"PLARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.A R C H I T E C T U R E+ E N G I N E E R I N GRAMY IBRAHIMARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+Cramartoo@yahoo.com714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DR.EASTVALE, CA 92880www.artoodesigns2dio.comLICENSEDARCHITEC T S T ATE OFCALIFORNIARNo. C 37222Ren. 09/30/19MAMYIBRAH I RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT.NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURED:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvt3/31/2019 9:52:11 PM3/31/2019 9:52:11 PM3/31/2019 9:52:11 PM3/31/2019 9:52:11 PMA-8SectionsProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow18072510 DEC. 20185034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701 1/4" = 1'-0"Section C 1/4" = 1'-0"Section D UPUP1st Floor - L2178' - 0"T.P. 22197' - 2"T.P. 12187' - 1"Grade2173' - 6"2ND LEVEL2188' - 1"ABCDEGROOF LVL2202' - 0 5/32"Garage2175' - 0"1st Floor - H2182' - 0"FAA-7BA-7CA-815'-0"45° 00' 00"SIDE SETBACK15'-0"PL15'-0"10'-0"PL30'-0"30'-0"45° 00' 00"30'-0"MIN 42' FRONT SB TO CURB42'-1 1/4"34'-0 3/4"33'-11 1/2"17'-0"SIDE SB10'-0"25'-7"42'-0"28'-0"30'-0"4'-0"8'-0"100.00'30'-0"FRONT SETBACK30'-0"10'-0"MIN SIDE SB15'-0"75'-0"2182' - 0"2184' - 6"2177' - 10"2174' - 10"2172' - 10"2177' - 4"2201' - 0 15/16"2203' - 10 7/8"2201' - 6 15/16"2197' - 8 1/2"2197' - 8 1/2"2203' - 2 7/8"2197' - 8 1/2"2190' - 6 25/32"2' OVERHANG8%5%10%18'-0"4:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:124:12VALLEYHIPHIPRIDGERIDGEHIPHIPHIPVALLEYRIDGEHIPHIPRIDGERIDGERIDGEARTOO DESIGN S2DIO, INC.A R C H I T E C T U R E+ E N G I N E E R I N GRAMY IBRAHIMARCHITECT, LEED AP BD+Cramartoo@yahoo.com714.707.11147039 VILLAGE DR.EASTVALE, CA 92880www.artoodesigns2dio.comLICENSEDARCHITEC T S T ATE OFCALIFORNIARNo. C 37222Ren. 09/30/19MAMYIBRAH I RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF RAMY IBRAHIM, ARCHITECT.NOT VAILD WITHOUT WET SIGNATURED:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvtD:\0.ramy_dell_2015\0.artoo desigm s2dio_jobs\2018-07-25_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Alta Loma\Revit\20180725_Amy_5034 Via Verde_Rancho - 04.rvt3/31/2019 9:52:12 PM3/31/2019 9:52:12 PM3/31/2019 9:52:12 PM3/31/2019 9:52:12 PMA-9Section & Roof PlanProposed Two Story SFD For:Amy Crow18072510 DEC. 20185034 Via Verde St, Alta Loma, CA 91701 1/4" = 1'-0"Section E 3/32" = 1'-0"Roof Plan ’CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENCHMARK NO. 10109ELEVATION = 2002.424 FEETSET 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURB STAMPED " CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10109 1987" AT SOUTHWESTCORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND SAPPHIRE STREET ATEND OF CURB RETURN.’’” ” ’ Exhibit C WMVIA VERDE SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE2178.00 FF2177.33 PAD2175.30 FF2174.63 PAD2173.00 FF2172.33 PAD2178.00 FF2177.33 PAD2182.00 FF2181.33 PAD78.12FS-JOIN10%77.80FS75.15TG73.92INV77.62FS-GBCL DWYW=12'78.07FS-JOIN77.39FS10%76.08FS76.60FS-JOIN75.70FS-JOIN72.50TG71.50INV9.9%75.15TG74.15INV75.15TG74.42INV75.15TG74.10INV70.92INVS=0.03775.20FS77.84FS77.84FS77.84FS77.84FS77.84FS77.33FS77.64TG74.72INV77.80TG77.10INV77.80TG76.98INV77.84FS(84.06)FS-JOIN81.34FS81.40FS83.84FS1.9%1.5%77.74FSS=0.01 S=0.0176.81INV1%MIN 1%MIN1%MIN1%MIN72.84FS72.84FS72.84FS72.84FS72.60FS72.54FSPROP.DECK81.84FSPROP.DECKPROP.DECK74.84FS77.50TG74.22INV73.97INVS=0.0177.50TG74.47INV77.50TG74.58INV80.84TG74.81INV80.84TG74.83INV80.84TG77.10INV75.88FS-GB2180217978.25TG77.25INVCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENCHMARK NO. 10109ELEVATION = 2002.424 FEETSET 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURB STAMPED " CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10109 1987" AT SOUTHWESTCORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND SAPPHIRE STREET ATEND OF CURB RETURN. 0.5%6:1 SLOPEPROP.WALLW/ V-DITCH4' MAXPLPL9.7%PROP. WALL4' MAX3:1 SLOPEPROP. 6'WALLPROP.SIDEWALKEX. GRADEEX. GRADEPLPLV-DITCHEX. GRADEEX. GRADEPROP. 6'WALL2178 FF2178 FF2182 FF2173 FF2175 FFCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENCHMARK NO. 10109ELEVATION = 2002.424 FEETSET 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURB STAMPED " CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10109 1987" AT SOUTHWESTCORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND SAPPHIRE STREET ATEND OF CURB RETURN.SECTION D-DSECTION E-E PROP.GUARDRAILPROP.WALLW/ V-DITCH4' MAX3:1 SLOPEDAYLIGHT2178 FFEX. CURB& GUTTERPLPLEX. GRADEPROP.WALLW/ V-DITCH4' MAX2175.00 FF10%PROP.TRENCHDRAINPROP.GUARDRAILEX. CURB& GUTTEREX. GRADEEX. GRADEPLPLCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENCHMARK NO. 10109ELEVATION = 2002.424 FEETSET 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURB STAMPED " CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10109 1987" AT SOUTHWESTCORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND SAPPHIRE STREET ATEND OF CURB RETURN.SECTION F-FSECTION G-G WMVIA VERDE78.00TW76.66TFH=1.5'80.67TW76.67TFH=4'78.00TW74.00TFH=4'78.00TW74.00TFH=4'78.00TW74.00TFH=4'80.00TW77.32TFH=3'81.32TW77.32TFH=3.5'84.00TW81.32TFH=3'84.00TW82.00TFH=2'81.32TW77.32TFH=4'81.32TW77.32TFH=4'81.32TW77.32TFH=4'81.32TW77.32TFH=4'81.32TW77.32TFH=4'SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCEDRAINAGECHANNELWATER ENERGYDISSIPATER78.00TW76.66TFH=1.5'84.00TW81.32TFH=3'81.32TW77.32TWH=4'84.00TW82.00TFH=2'21812182218321822183218421802179CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENCHMARK NO. 10109ELEVATION = 2002.424 FEETSET 2" BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURB STAMPED " CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10109 1987" AT SOUTHWESTCORNER OF HILLSIDE ROAD AND SAPPHIRE STREET ATEND OF CURB RETURN. DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Mena Abdul-Ahad August 6, 2019 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM - Site plan and architectural review of a 3,030 square foot single-family residence with an attached 866 square foot garage on a 20,000 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, the Hillside Overlay and the Equestrian Overlay at 5034 Via Verde - APN: 1061-201-09. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. Site Characteristics: The 20,000 square foot vacant project site is located on the east side of Via Verde and south of Almond Street, within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, the Hillside Overlay and Equestrian Overlay. The property dimensions are approximately 200 feet along the north property line, 100 feet along the east property line, 100 feet along the west property line, and 200 feet along the south property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 2,185 feet as measured at the curb face along the east property line and an elevation of approximately 2,158 feet as measured along the west property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 27 feet from the east to west property lines. The site is covered in short grasses and is bordered by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay North Single-Family Residence Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay South Single-Family Residence Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay East Single-Family Residence Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay West Single-Family Residence Very Low Residential Very Low (VL) Residential Hillside Overlay Equestrian Overlay Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 3,030 square foot two-story, single- family residence on the project site. The proposed grading includes up to 6’-11” of fill, and 5’-3” of cut which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission per Section 17.122.020.G.1.I. Architecture: The proposed residence has a contemporary ranch style design theme, which includes a standing seam metal roof, painted musket brown. The residence was designed to be compliant with the Hillside Design Guidelines (Section 17.122.020.D.2), including minimizing Exhibit D DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 - RAMY IBRAHIM August 6, 2019 Page 2 view obstructions. The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the west elevation. The proposed 3,030 square foot residence consists of a 2,886 square foot lower level, which includes the main living area and a bedroom, and a 1,080 square foot upper level, which includes two additional bedrooms. The upper and lower levels each include decks along the west elevations. The size of the 3,030 square foot residence is in keeping with homes constructed along Via Verde, which range in size from 1,951 square feet to 5,317 square feet. A three-car garage is located underneath the southern portion of the first story of the residence, with the garage door facing east and accessed by a driveway with up to a 10 percent grade. Hillside Development Standard 17.122.020.C.1.D. states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are permitted when they are aligned with the natural contours of the lot and are necessary to achieve site design goals. Very Low Residential District Code Compliance: The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The development requirements are as follows: Hillside Overlay Code Compliance: The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The project site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 13 feet from the north to south property lines and 27 feet from east to west property lines. Retaining W alls: The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay per Section 17.122.020.C.1.G, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3 foot separation between the stepped walls. No retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet and a minimum 3 foot separation is proposed between the stepped retaining wall. The proposed perimeter walls are in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E., having walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. Perimeter Walls and Fencing: The applicant is not proposing any perimeter walls at this time. The existing residences to the north and south have existing perimeter walls in place. Grading: The proposed grading design limits earthwork to 34 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the driveway and foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 2,188 feet Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 42’ 4242’ Interior Side Yards 10’ / 15’ 10’ / 18’ Rear Yard 60’ 75’ Lot Coverage 25% max 14.5% Building Height 30’ limit within the Hillside Overlay 26’-1” DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 - RAMY IBRAHIM August 6, 2019 Page 3 and the lower garag e pad at an elevation of 2,175, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. Building Envelope Analysis: Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.C. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north-south and two east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. View Analysis: In conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2., the residence has increased side yard setbacks to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding the lot and to minimize view obstructions. Landscape: The proposed front yard landscaping is designed to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., which requires new development to include the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The proposed front landscaping complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area. The proposed front yard landscaping does not exceed the maximum applied water allowance (MAW A) which meets the criteria of State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) Section 17.82.020. All vegetation shall be designed and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) for sites located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) fire area and is in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Staff Comments Staff is in support of the architectural, site, and grading design for the proposed 3,030 square foot residence. The project conforms with the Development Code and the Hillside Design Standards and Guidelines, including providing a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible and to reduce the height of the structure to limit view obstructions as seen from the residences to the north. The residence is well-designed and carries the design theme to all elevations, including providing wall plane articulation. The residence is stepped with the existing grade and includes a garage tucked underneath the house, further reducing the overall bulk as seen from Via Verde. Earthwork is limited to 34 cubic yards of import and grading is limited to the area necessary to construct the residence, driveway and patio deck area to the west of the residence. The proposed design does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions, and the size of the residence is in keeping with the existing residences constructed along Via Verde. Major Issues: None Secondary Issues: None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee review the project and provide comments as warranted. If the Committee finds the project acceptable, Staff recommends that it be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Staff Planner: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner RESOLUTION NO. 19-58 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-01013 - SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 3,030 SQUARE FOOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 866 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE ON A 20,000 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY AND EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY AT 5034 VIA VERDE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 1061-201-09. A. Recitals. 1. Ramy Ibrahim filed an application for the approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2018- 01013, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Hillside Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 25th day of September 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on September 25, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 3,030 square foot single-family residence with an attached 866 square foot garage on a 20,000 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, within the Hillside Overlay and Equestrian Overlay at 5034 Via Verde; and b. The site is bordered by single-family residence to the north, south, east, and west. The surrounding properties are all within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay, and Equestrian Overlay; and c. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay, and Equestrian Overlay, including providing a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible and to reduce the height of the structure to limit view obstructions as seen from the residences to the north; and d. The design limits earthwork to 34 cubic yards of import, which most of the import is necessary to allow the construction of the driveway and foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 2,188 feet and the lower grade pad at an elevation of 2,175 feet, which is in conformance with the Hillside Overlay Exhibit E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-58 HDR DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 Page 2 Design. The proposed design does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions, and the square footage is in keeping with the other residences along Via Verde; and e. The residence is in compliance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.e., which requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north-south and two east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement; and f. Retaining walls are limited to 4 feet in height or less, in keeping with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.G.1.j. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site is Very Low (VL) Residential District. The Very Low (VL) Residential designation is intended for the development of detached, low-density residences on individual lots. The General Plan also has a goal of facilitating sustainable and attractive infill development that complements surrounding neighborhoods. The project is for the development of a single-family residence on an existing residential lot that is complementary to the surrounding neighborhood. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The Development Code states that the Very Low (VL) Residential District is for the development of single-family residential uses with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre. The project site is an existing 20,000-square foot vacant lot that was intended for the development of a single-family residence. c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, including building setback, building height, lot coverage, grading limitations and design. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay, and Equestrian Overlay. The required front yard setback is 42 feet (plus or minus 5 feet), the required side yard setbacks are 10 and 15 feet and the required rear yard setback is 60 feet. The proposed front yard setback is 42 feet, the side yard setbacks are 10 feet and 18 feet, and the rear yard setback is 96 feet. Lot coverage is 14.5 percent, well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 25 percent. The overall building height is 30 feet, which is at the maximum permitted height limit within the Hillside Overlay District. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is in keeping with the existing residences in the surrounding area and is not expected to create a detrimental impact on the existing residences. The size of the residence is in keeping with the size of the existing homes constructed along Via Verde. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-58 HDR DRC2018-01013 – RAMY IBRAHIM SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 Page 3 the Planning Department’s determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff’s determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of September 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: