Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020-02-12 Supplementals - PC-HPC
Shean Kim for Xebec Realty DRC2019-00590 February 12, 2020 Project Description Who: Shean Kim for Xebec Realty What: A request to develop a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building that includes a 95,945 square foot warehouse area and 4,000 square feet of office space on the main floor and an additional 4,000 square feet of office space within the mezzanine Where: East side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route Entitlements: Design Review DRC2019-00590 General Plan Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District Industrial Building, Single-Family Residences General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District Warehouse Building General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District Location r r� u u • �� e. �o. _ .. . m .A _.. _. _: . . a .e K7nlbJ u• RAx� Project Site k a 1 J I z �� �r CI11001F RANCHO CUCAMONGA T �s Mal A _ Pecan Avenue Looking Northeast Site Plan OW � - 9M 5 BUILDING AREA FOOTPUT 10020SF ZIP YFPAMI!C4A)SF •' 0FA:1012D SF, - 1 uY 9W - ♦�I SAS• 1I (PN9 - F P y Mcnn CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _ _ Required Provided Compliant? Development Requirements Building Setback (Street) 25 Feet 70 Feet Yes Building Setback (Side) 5 Feet 40 and 50 Feet Yes Building Setback (Rear) 0 Feet 135 Feet Yes 15 Feet 45 Feet Yes 25 Feet 33 Feet Yes Parking Setback Landscape Depth Landscape Coverage10 Percent 10. : Percent Ratio Percent Percent Height* *35 Feet at Minimum Setback (1 Foot Additional Height for Each 1 Foot of Additional Setback ����� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � r� Parking Ratio Required provided Parking Parking Parking Requirements Office Parking (8,000 SF) 1:251 SF 32 Spaces Spaces 111 • 1 111 SF Warehouse Parking 1:2,000 for 2nd 20,000 SF 45 Spaces SF) 1:4,000 for Total Vehicle Parking77 SpacesSpaces Trailer Parking _ Dock High Door 1 Spaces 10 Spaces (10 Dock High Doors) ���r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Design Overview • The proposed building will be of concrete tilt-up construction, with each facade painted a palette of five colors; • Metal cladding and extensive glazing will accent the office area with a sandblast finish and high windows accenting the other elevations; • Building pop-outs are proposed on the north and south elevations to provide wall plane articulation and visual interest; • The required 500 square foot employee outdoor eating area will be located along the south property line and will include a metal lattice shade cover, multiple dining tables, and a trash receptacle. AK -'sm. son SWIN 46PE: wgl.qwll� Nii QPM-lA 9--eau: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA A' 1. r 'JJ i .nil". : /� .. i w�` ► '�►�►� AN 1 411 F CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r r� r r r� �.�. ("-Crc �.....0.:...m— ,:•.,:.. r_ rl -cIGC_p�Ofioop:0.:)o02C J_C:G7C071':O.cC_p1�O. iC"'S•_:7R07L'>,'J_c_:o_7<Y_occpup lc:o]o:)C"OSc.)7C'Jco_Yl occar�QLtcOQo:)Co7cOfyc.oco_N'. cJ�:o '��� s �t'��•�°<onouoo S•c?,:`vc3o`oe6ouo`o Soio� o0o ODOO[0 0000eio jdu°°�oar�d'tdo>0000 Se oo_°e op occooi�ai ie�o:eepo'iobbouov3u � p' 06 PROPOSED BUILDING 04 O• e �p '3,,hy i��► p >:wst kQ� ■I O o 1 §tea ■' °o. 'II6 rr9 ■ o 00 O \\ 0 lit°n o o o aeeenee p •��,\` .�- �:��p`v9e�"9a?,L�o�onor ono`mu1(I��`?do�oPo�n_q°AZ�uo'°on`°�e°>�nr o�n"ooyul{a7�of•°��neo�' O 00 owl IIIIIIIIII y� .��. .� ! s. y� �.� a_ y. �.� s� ay►_ o e'.YrJ�3"'3ffC C 0:00?70:>cG OGOJ.:O:I`:Crf2.QW;X:!`,YL'O•JCO Co0� "EGAD&bJO.G.GO'..nnq�0 1C OJc 9:::.Caac�•YCOJc:abc���n x eJc'•]c� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r � Neighborhood Meeting December 4 , 2019 • No residents attended the meeting . Interdepartmental Review • The Fire , Engineering and Building Departments have reviewed the project and have provided general comments which are included as conditions of approval . Environmental • The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — Infill Projects; • The project is consistent with the General Plan as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations; • The proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres; • The project site has no value as a habitat for endangered , rare or threatened species; • The project will not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; • The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Noticing • Notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet (83 property owners) and published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on February 3, 2020 ; • A letter was received on February 11 th from Lozeau Drury, LLP, questioning the use of a CEQA categorical exemption ; • The letter states that the CEQA analysis prepared by the applicant's consultants may not comply with the Cumulative Impact and Significant Effect exceptions under Article 19 Infill Exemption — Categorical Exemptions ; • The applicant's consultant has submitted a response letter pp p which has been provided to the Commissioners . Public Art • The project is subject to the public art requirement and will be required to provide public art on the project site with a minimum value of $ 103, 945 or pay an in-lieu fee to the City's Public Art fund , equal to the minimum value of art that would otherwise be included in the development project. Conclusions Staff supports the project for the following reasons: • Well designed building and site layout; • The project complies with all Development Code requirements including parking , building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage ; • The project site is well-designed for the proposed warehouse distribution land use, with the dock high doors screened from public view by the building . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA x, Staff Recommendation • Approve Design Review DRC2019-00590 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions . CITY OF RANCHO . . Planning Commission Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20006 Design Review DRC2018 - 00529 February 12 , 2020 Project Background • Applicant : RedRock Development on behalf of Scheu Management Company • Proposal : Scheu Industrial Project — 4-parcel subdivision and 4 new industrial/office buildings • Location : NEC Archibald Avenue and 71h Street 3now r �� s I . _..�—._-•�_" 1 � ^`'?fir_. Arthib$Id yo Boot Gem ATM. _ China in DI Engineerin Project Site n - S S, ThSt 11, Yh SI f ,y . Perf c i 7 ess S p , 0.`� n Hamd n •am Jy Br wery / ! y 1 l EJe,weiss Gassy Cafe• PloTek Models 83D Prinling - - V � GOO9�e NearOand label Printer ' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �r�r 3 Montessori Scndal HouseT4 1 t � _ t u +s c ■1 a �_ F'ank-s Upnplste y(•I' tj ' 0 1 AO ` r v Acaaa St Acec,a St Y Aoh,b�ld Fit ._+.,. B fBaot Lamb ATM China l on., I 1 'L f � • istics Proje nns nn s7 T A r -rt a it ess si-,��ac � � Industrial andCommercial r , Classy Cale' Offices — V r � Google - Neanianeiabei Pnmers if �r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA � r� Proposed Project • Subdivide the property into 4 parcels; • Construct 4 industrial logistics buildings ( one parcel ) ; per p ) ; • Combined floor area of the buildings will be about 241,000 square feet; and • Potential tenants are warehouse or manufacturing companies CITY OF RANCHO . . -�_— — — --------- esaae� €: -- J IL ^ — � "...:` I f -a♦' gel�11 � ��� , _ 1 iff I BUIL NG II aVI � � I I�� I � Dock i I � — i Area. 1 I ck rem _ I L, I rt---- --- `------- -- ! — — — - - BUIL DING 4 ing Are BUILDING - J BIDING , • - -� I. I y ' Y 1•': • f� - - )M STREET r` IOf I � I = Office Areas NORTH CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA tow Technical Details Area Floor Area Parcel (Acres) Building (Square Feet) 1 . 03 1 1 17 , 300 1 . 14 2 2 141750 3 4 .69 3 74 , 660 4 5 . 98 4 1241000 CITY OF RANCHO . . Development Code Requirements Development Standard Required Proposed Building Height Max. 70' 41'-4" Floor Area Ratio 50-60% 43% l Front (Major Arterial; Archibald Min . 48' on Avenue) Archibald Front (Local; Acacia Street and 71n � Min. 25' Min . 25' Street) Side Yard Setback Min . 5' Min . 5' Rear Yard Setback Min. 0' Min. 5' Landscape Percentage Min . 10% 11 .9% L Building 2 Elevations EAST ELEVAMN .06 Aft. r. EAST ELEVA'ON 4 t �.� ■ SOUTH ELEVATION 4 es i, _.:. Building41 SOUTH ELEVA-ON WEST ELEVAMN NORTH wLEVkTCN • .• ��rrr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r r � Building 4 Elevations EAST ELEVATION •+ I 4 ML wt:l A n-J . SOUTH ELEVATION 3 WESTELEVATION r.rrcI Q NONTN ELEVATION r.:>.. LdI1R H001�F/WT9MLL ��. 'i 1 �� n r ;; r �� . .. � � i --�.�.� � 6' � . ,. ���,"' � �,, ,,. � ` ,� �, .. . �� ��� �,, ��-= '�� x� ��:FW � ,� iy Q � I i i, � � � 1 STREET PERSPECTIVE IN �s 1 STREET PERSPECTIVE S 2 I STREET PERSPECTIVE IN 4 STREET PERSPECTIVE S 5 i 1 I i dw�.. STREET PERSPECTIVE IN ^= 7 STREET PERSPECTIVE S - - S Design/Technical Review • The proposed project was reviewed by the Design and Technical Review Committees on July 16, 2019; • No significant issues were identified; and • The Committees accepted Staff recommendation to approve the project and recommend approval to the Planning Commission . Neighborhood Meeting • A Neighborhood Meeting was conducted at Iglesia La Roca Fellowship Church at 9757 7th Street on July 11, 2019; • Notifications for the meeting were sent to all owners of property within 660 feet of the project site; and • No residents nor other interested individuals from the community attended the meeting. Environmental Review • Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA), the City prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project; • Findings in the Initial Stud support the g Y pp determination that, with the implementation of mitigation measures to address impacts there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; Environmental Review • Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for circulation and review; and • Public notice of the public comment period and of the City's intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration was provided ; • Comments were received during the circulation and comment period . CITY OF RANCHO . . �l Environmental Review • No revisions to the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration were required in response to the comments that were received; and • A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA qi. Noticing • Newspaper advertising; • Posting of the project site; • Mailed notices to owners of property located within 660 feet of the project site; and • No comments were received in response to these notifications except emails requesting clarification on the date of the public hearing Conclusion Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve : • Tentative Parcel Map 20006 • Design Review DRC2018-00529 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval . Youlita and Kiryakos, LLC DRC2019-00939 February 12, 2020 Project Description Who: Youlita and Kiryakos, LLC What: A request to allow for a one (1 ) year time extension of a previously approved Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18823) along with related Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012-00513 to subdivide 3 parcels of land totaling 12.93 acres into 19 lots Where: West side of Wardman Bullock Road and South of Blue Sky Court Entitlements: Time Extension DRC2019-00939 v**7ks ■ Partially Completed Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential > Residential Development Residential District* / Vacant Land and 3 Single Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential Family Residences Residential District* Single Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential Residential District Single Family Residences Low Low (L) Residential District Residential WLFlood Control Basin Conservation Flood Control (FC) District CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Location ,u. ICJ � i �. ' • �� - � m `'h`�'j-' �y"� t� � �i..'1k+e � ,�1' �.1 •,�+�{, �++n�YtdC * 3".�µ� 7 + 0 t p d Partially Completed Re ,Z1 fi :. lot Y� r ����� _ __ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Y� Wardman Bullock Road Looking Northwest t x i y CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r r� R P a ` dkt i� Wardman Bullock Roao Looking Southwest CITY OF RANCHO MLTentative Parcel Map SUBTT18823 a .: •,tl •3 „ � 1 ' t ° 17 • 19 Lot subdivision on 12.93 _ t;j acres of land Lots #12 and #15 include 14 ,s r IB unfinished residences rtcalm.r. a '�.4 i Three existing residences on '• ' t 71 the north side of Blue Sky � - Court are not part of the subject subdivision A 8 9 r 10 1 K yli m�r�lvi� CITY OF 1 • l • l Time Extension Overview • The applicant is requesting a one year time extension of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18823, Variance DRC2012-00135 and Minor Exception DRC2012- 00513. • The time extension request is necessary to complete the final map process with the Engineering Department; • With approval of the subject time extension, the expiration date of each entitlement will be January 23, 2021 ; • The subject Tentative Map is eligible for two additional time extensions; • The related Variance and Minor Exception are not eligible for additional time extension and will be required to be refiled if final map approval of SUBTT18823 does not take place prior to January, 23, 2021 . Approval History (Tentative Map) Tentative Tract Map 18823 Approval History Approving Approval/Extension Type Approval Approval Expiration Authority Period Date Date r Planning Original Approval 3 Years 01/23/13 01/23/16 AssemblyCommission Automatic Extension 2 Years n/a 01/23/18 Planning I Time Extension DRC2017-00922 1 Year 02/14/18 01/23/19 Commission. lanning Time Extension DRC2018-00966 1 Year 04/10/19 01/23/20 Commission (proposed) Planning Time Extension DRC2019-00939 1 Year 02/12/20 01/23/21 Commission (proposed) (proposed) Approval History (Variance/ME ) Variance D • 00 DRC2012-00513 Approving Approval/Extension Type Approval Approval Expiration Date Authority Period Date Planning Original Approval 5 Years 01/23/13 01/23/18 Commission Planning Time Extension DRC2017-00951 2 Years 02/14/18 01/23/20 Commissionand DRC2017-00952 Planning Time Extension DRC2019-00939 1 Year 02/12/20 01/23/21 Commission (proposed) (proposed) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA kv*07, Biological Update • The applicant submitted a Biological Constraints Analysis Addendum ( ELMT Consulting ; January 14, 2020) which states that the onsite conditions have not changed since their previous analysis dated February 15 , 2019 . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA **affkj Environmental • Mitigated Negative Declaration was adopted on January 23, 2013, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18823 ; • CEQA Guidelines Section 151621 states that no subsequent or supplemental review is necessary if the scope of the project has not changed from that considered as part of the original CEQA review. Interdepartmental Review • The Fire, Engineering and Building Departments have reviewed the project and have provided general comments which are included as conditions of approval . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Noticing • Notices were mailed to all property owners within 660 feet ( 131 property owners) and published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on February 3, 2020 . • To date , staff has received no inquiries regarding this project. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Qi. Public Art • Tentative Maps are exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17 . 124 of the Development Code. p p The future development of the nineteen ( 19) single- family residences on the subject tentative map will be required to fulfill the public art requirement. Based on the number of future residential units, the total art value required per Section 17 . 124. 020 . C . is $ 14,250 . Conclusions Staff supports the project for the following reasons : • The approved tentative map conforms to the related development requirements except for the necessity for a Variance for reduction in lot depth for Lot #9 and a Minor Exception for wall height on Lots #1 , #9 , and #10 ; • The Variance and Minor Exception are necessary due to onsite constraints including the existing cul-di-sac to the north , the two existing partially completed single-family residences and onsite grade changes. Staff Recommendation • Approve Time Extension DRC2019-00939 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Redhill Gas DRC2019-00381 February 12, 2020 Project Description Who: Ken Kang What: A request to redevelop an existing service station including replacing the existing 1 ,389 square foot convenience store with a new 3,235 square foot convenience store, constructing a new parking lot and installing the required public right-of-way improvements Where: Northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive Entitlements: Design Review DRC2019-00381 Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00936 Non-Operational Service Station Mixed-Use (MU) & Convenience Store Mixed-Use Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 Vacant Land Mixed-Use (MU) Agricultural Use Mixed-Use Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 Mixed-Use (MU) • Commercial Building Mixed-Use Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 Mixed-Use (MU) Vacant Land Mixed-Use Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 Vacant Land Mixed-Use (MU) Agricultural Use Mixed-Use Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 Location 4. li ZZ INS CITY a.ln e•, OF • . _ . t X c i LookingFoothill Blvd. rr�rr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r rr r r �� i R t Looking est V �� r� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Site Plan O OUN MY L;LUt5 UK. ------------ 6 oJ It \\ � J c / � / r�}<eliiL4�J pyR•�\r���..�,i _o a (v�� .f�ac�_'.,.reul� a - , � ` �QsSooy�� !� �"©•lp £ `s GIs �'�. a`► Si /6 J eta/ �� �•�.gym o M1, ,q� c Y �u �/ O /y V • m G �I G � J O�1 Mi rr �� CITY OF RANCHO 1,1111UCAMONGA r r� r � r� Development Requirements Building Setback (Foothill Blvd.) 45 Feet 14 Feet Existing Canopy)* Yes 35 Buildingg Setback _ (Red HiTI Country Club Drive) ' Buildingg Setback (Future) (Red HiTI Country Club Drive) Parking Setback (Red Hill Country Club Drive) t-9 Inches* Yes 35 Feet 68 Feet Yes 15 Feet 45 Feet Yes Parking Setback (Foothill) 25 Feet 33 Feet Yes Parking Setback (Red Hill CC) 20 Feet 25 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage10 Percent 23 Percent Area Ratio Percent ' Percent 75 Feet 24 Feet-3 Inches Yes Maximum Height *Mixed-Use Districts permitted an up to 75 percent reduction in the minimum setback requirements Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking Convenience Store (2,500 SF*) 000 *Code Permitted SF Deductions �� �� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Design Overview • The convenience store is designed with a craftsman architectural design theme which exhibits horizontal cement board, real river rock wainscoting/pilasters, a flat tile roof, and wood-look rafter tails; • The existing fuel island canopy will be updated to include horizontal cement board siding and real river rock veneer to match the convenience store; • All equipment for the convenience store (A/C units, refrigeration units, and venting) will be located on the roof of the building and will be screened from view by the roof parapets; • The monument/fuel pricing sign is designed to complement the main building including the use of real river rock and a tile roof. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA k**7t, NORTH ELEVATION-CONVENIENCE STORE "'.. 1!Wl An NORTHWEST ELEVATION-EXISTING CONVENIENCE STORE "° SOUTHWEST ELEVATION-EXISTING CONVENIENCE STORE ��r�r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r rr r [AST ELEVATION -EXISTING CONVENIENCE STORE e�.. � - SOUTHWEST-NEW MONUMENT PRICE SIGNAGE x RED HILL GAS COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT +�.�-�"'"" L ' �w.� . "�. . " '; SOUTHEAST-NEW MONUMENT PRICE SIGNAGE SOUTH ELEVATION -EXISTING iiiiiiii III Jill 11111111111111111111111111111111 »- 1070,?1 I I I .{ ICI SOUTHWEST ELEVATION-EXIST.CANOPY WI NEW FINISH I tiL SOUTHEAST ELEVATION-EXIST.CANOPY W/NEW FINISH Alk �r�c- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rr RED HILL GAS / COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT 8168E 8190 FOOTHILL BLVD.,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 D18N EDWARDS. "NEDWARDSDE(US2 WHITELWn,Edawda Mahan BeigeO"Edwxm. DaABegs-Div Edwards Btafi4)"Edwards DE427(VRRAGE RED) (STONE CRAFT) DEV.18()VMf1E DOVER PLAINS(DE 61161 BURNS CAVE IDE 6M BLACK(DEA187) Example of Real River Rode Acdaim Lighting Amsan Matte Black One Light vreighl conc.tile: -Lghtl5$-inch outdoor wall mart Eagle I Bel Air-Dark Purple Range -206 SL Valejo Range MK oca o„ Example of a commercial lempeled glass(Clear) „ 8 me!al Mullions(anodized-black) CITY OF RANCHO �w Conditional Use Permit • Service station and convenience store will operate 24 hours-per- day/7-days per week; • Convenience store will include fast food tenant; • Convenience store will include a Type 20 Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) license, which permits the sale of packaged beer and wine for off-site consumption ; • Alcoholic beverage sales will be less than 10 percent of the floor area of the convenience store; • ABC requirements, alcoholic beverages are not permitted to be sold from 2 : 00 a. m . to 7.00 a . m . , 7 days per week. Public Art • The project is subject to the public art requirement and will be required to provide public art on the project site with a minimum value of $3 ,235 ($ 1 per square foot) or pay an in- lieu fee to the City's public art fund , equal to the minimum value of art that would otherwise be included in the development project. Neighborhood Meeting December 5 , 2019 • One (1 ) resident in attendance • Concerns Raised: 1 . Bright Lights 2. Security 3. Monument Signage • Applicant's Responses.- 1 . Lighting will be designed to not spill over beyond property lines 2. Security cameras will be located both inside and outside the building 3. Monument signage will be located on Foothill Boulevard and will include required fuel pricing information S Environmental • The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures; • The Class 3 exemption permits the construction of commercial buildings up to 10 , 000 square feet in an urbanized area ; • The project is for the construction of a 3,235 square foot convenience store in a Mixed-Use zone and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Interdepartmental Review • The Fire, Engineering and Building Departments have reviewed the project and have provided general comments which are included as conditions of approval . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA kv. Noticing • Notices were mailed to all owners within 660 property feet (83 property owners) and published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on February 3, 2020 . • To date , staff has received one letter, which a copy has been placed in front of you . Conclusions Staff supports the project for the following reasons: • Well designed building and site layout; • Accommodates the future alignment of Red Hill Country Club Drive and the Foothill Boulevard street improvements , • Beautifies a stretch of Foothill Boulevard that is at the western gateway into the City. Staff Recommendation • Approve Design Review DRC2019-00381 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00936 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions . 4Vchard B. csZ Charina B. 9Kc{Donald 8238 4?§dHiQCountry Clu6 Or. Wlncho Cucamonga, Cafifornm 91730 7ef: (310)597-3986 email; richarAmcdonafdfgmad com February 7,2020 CITY CUCAMONGA Planning Department FEB 10 2020 City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 C 1 PLANNING 1 A Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 ��'"��� � t LI11'? RE: Planning Commission Meeting on February 12,2020,7:00 PM DR DRC2019-00381 & CUP DRC2018-00936 8166 Foothill Boulevard,LLC Dear Commissioners, The purpose of this letter is to express our concerns and suggestions regarding the above-referenced Project. We are homeowners in the Red Hill neighborhood. This letter expresses concerns that a great number of our neighbors have about the Project. Without implementing our below reasonable conditions relative to the Project,the Red Hill neighborhood will suffer increased crime, traffic and vagrancy, among other negative impacts. This project site has a history of causing negative impacts on the neighborhood. In its previous use, reports of these negative impacts are well-documented in the Police Department's records. Worse, the proposed new use is larger and more intensive than the previous use. Therefore, to mitigate this Project's negative impacts, we wish to suggest the below. • Limited Store Hours and Security Guard: The convenience store should operate during reasonable business hours; say from 6:00 AM to 10 PM daily. A security guard should be on-premise 24 hours daily. The Project should not become the go-to spot for late-night alcohol runs. Absent these reasonable conditions, vagrancy, panhandling, unruliness and crime of all sorts will become commonplace with the Project. • Restricted Vehicle Access onto Red Hill Country Club Dr.: Restricting traffic onto Red Hill Country Club (CC) Dr. would be consistent with conditions previously required by the City on the Sycamore Heights development just up the street. Without channeling traffic onto Foothill Blvd., Red Hill CC Dr. would become heavily trafficked by non-residential users. Among other negative impacts this would cause are an increased danger to human use of Red Hill CC Dr.(e.g., children, walking and jogging, bicycles,etc.), air and noise pollution and decreased access by emergency vehicles(e.g., fire and police). • Appropriate Fencing Along Red Hill CC Dr. and Adjacent Property: To mitigate unsightliness, noise, inappropriate pedestrian foot traffic and other negative impacts, solid, aesthetic fencing at least six feet tall should be required along both Red Hill CC Dr.and the property next to the Project. Gates could be installed for any necessary, temporary or emergency pedestrian or vehicle use. Granting the permits without the above reasonable conditions would be detrimental to the public interest, health,safety, convenience and welfare. Absent these conditions,the Project would be materially injurious to persons, property and improvements in its vicinity. Therefore, we respectfully request that you require these conditions. Respectfully, J, . W -�- RICHARD B. MCDONALD UCON An Employee-Owned Company February 12, 2020 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Associate Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Reference: 8545 Pecan Avenue Project(R.ECON Number 9471) Dear Mr.Van der Zwaag: This letter addresses the environmental review that we have conducted for the 8545 Pecan Avenue Project (project). The project 4.77-acre project site is located east of Pecan Avenue and south of Arrow Route in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California.The project site is currently developed with a truck and trailer repair center with five buildings totaling approximately 10,200 square feet and is surrounded by residential uses to the north, northeast, and southwest, and other industrial uses on all other adjacent properties. Figure 1 shows the regional location of the project site and Figure 2 shows an aerial photograph of the project site and vicinity.As part of the project, the existing structures would be demolished and a 103,945-square-Foot warehouse that includes 95,945 square feet of warehouse space, 8,000 square feet of associated office space, and 10 loading docks on the east side of the proposed building would be constructed. The project would be accessed by two driveways off Pecan Avenue. Figure 3 shows the site plan. Based on our review of the project,R.ECON Environmental, Inc. (RECON)has determined that the project would qualify for California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)approval under a Class 32 Categorical Exemption(CE)for infill development projects (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332). No exception to the exemption would apply.A discussion of how the project would meet each of the criteria for the infill development CE is presented below. Section 15332(a): The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project site is designated and zoned as General Industrial in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) General Plan. The project would be consistent with these land use and zoning designations.The project is limited to redevelopment of the project site and would not impact any adjacent uses.As described under Section 15332(d)below, the project would not result in any significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.Additionally, the project has been designed to be consistent with all applicable development requirements listed in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Section 15332(b): The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project site consists of a 4.77-acre property that is developed as a truck and trailer repair center.The project site is located within a fully urbanized area of the city and is surrounded by residential uses to the north, northeast, and southwest, and other industrial uses on all other adjacent properties. Therefore, the project is proposed within city limits on a site of no more than five acres that is substantially surrounded by urban uses. 1927 Fifth Avenue,San Diego,CA 92101 1 619.308.9333 1 reconenvironmental.com SANDIEGO I BAYAREA I TUCSON SAN B E R N A R D I N O ^ . Nes erd"a•' _s p 138 } 18 A 18 L O S A N G E L E S COUNT Y r_ i _— lOS SrnA t O , Angeles San _ Claremont II II },;.,r Bernardmo 300 La Rancho Rialto i Ve Grit/irh rne ,;Park ' Upland Cucamonga I;'`' , 66 Fontana , r t Highland Imas 1 �.f (� l .r Redlands ..,.,..- 0ioon `�; Colton-y " Lama. µ 'Pomona „ Ontario I I r I t Linda'.. Grand r a jTerrace d '� , o -_- 80 Diamon x any:lope. _ Glen Awn -n ''—ry el grove Chino ;..._. 6.' BOX Springs I vnn+y z J'x Mountain (71) 1�anta Aha Rrucl g Reserve,. - Reg Park _ _ Chino Hills �r Riverside , ' - "", y=a Brea Chino Hills State Park Prado Flood -Norm �` Valley Control Basin P Al, Yorba Linda - � � �;-" ' ' SAN LOS BERNARDINO Corona s ANGELES +' Lake Malhews aao Hrver Ayueaoa "ORANGE RIVERSIDE CIRveland NF -- Perris SAN DIEGO 0 Miles 5 Project Location FIGURE 1 RE C O N Regional Location MU0BS5\94711wmmon-gi0,g1.mxd 8/8/2019 bma \ Ima o Source:Nearma Nown June 2019) �k NIX�.�� ___ _ '• � _.. _ — _ i .:. I .. r V. 441 I � r a� 1. 0 Feet 150 \ , QProject Boundary FIGURE 2 RE C ON Project Location on Aerial Photograph M:WOB55M71\common_gis\fig2_aerial.mzd 8/8/2019 bma Map Source:RGA,2019 T e Z >I- Q a 9 BUILOINGAREA FOOTPIUNT:99,945 SF' I. z l' MEVAINE:4,OW SF Q e i G.FA:103945$F w •R .� � iRR1Rt�R�R-II..-.-.� O ® FIGURE 3 RE C O N Site Plan M.VOBS519471N MgraoM %fi93.ai 08mig hnm Mr.Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 5 February 12, 2020 Section 15332(c): The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. The project site has been developed and operated as a truck and trailer repair facility. The ground cover consists of crushed rock aggregate gravel("3l4 minus")spread across much of the property, along with parked and stored tractor-trailer rigs, vehicles, and miscellaneous parts. No natural vegetation occurs on the project site.Therefore, there are no sensitive plant species present, nor any is there any habitat for designated sensitive species.Additionally,the project site does not contain any riparian habitat or wetlands. Due to the urbanized nature of the project site and surrounding development, the project site does not function as a wildlife corridor. Section 15332(d):Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Transportation/Traffic The Trip Generation Assessment prepared for the project determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts related to traffic(Ganddini Group 2019).Table I compares the existing land use trip credit and the proposed project trip generation based upon trip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE),Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017, and City of Fontana,Truck Trip Generation Study,August 2003.Trip generation for the project was calculated based on Passenger Car Equivalents (PCE)recommended by the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program guidelines. Table 1 shows that the land use trip credit for the existing truck and trailer repair center estimated a total of approximately 242 daily vehicle trips, including 23 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 32 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour.The project is forecast to generate a total of approximately 237 daily PCE trips, including 22 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and 25 PCE trips during the PM peak hour.Therefore, the project would generate five fewer vehicle trips than the existing truck and trailer repair center. Table I Projeet Trip Generation Pro'e AM Peak RM Peak _ Daffy Lan Existing Automobile Care CenterJrO 10,200 KSF 15 8 23 15 17 34 242 Proposed Warehouse 79.57%Passenger Cars(PCE 11 3 14 4 11 15 144 3.46% 2-Axle Truck(PCE= 1. 103,945 KSF 1 0 1 0 1 1 9 4.64% 3-Axle Truck(PCE=2. 1 0 1 1 1 2 17 12.33%4-Axle Truck CE= 5 1 6 2 5 7 67 Warehouse Total 18 4 22 7 18 25 237 Difference(Proposed-Ex stin +3 -4 -1 -8 +1 -9 .5 SOURCE: Ganddini Group 2019. KSF=thousandsquare feet Mr. Tabs Van der Zwaag Page 6 February 12, 2020 Noise The Noise Analysis prepared by RECON determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts related to noise (RECON 2019a), both during construction and subsequent operation and traffic generation. Construction Noise Table 2 shows that construction noise levels would range from 56 to 65 A-weighted decibels one-hour equivalent noise level [dB(A)Leq] at the adjacent residential uses. Construction noise levels would not exceed 65 dB(A)Leq.Additionally, construction activities would only occur during the permitted hours specified in the City's Municipal Code.Although the existing adjacent residences would be exposed to construction noise levels that may be heard above ambient conditions, the exposure would be temporary and would occur during the times specified in the City's Municipal Code. Therefore, impacts associated with temporary increases in noise during construction would be less than significant. Table 2 Construction Noise Levels And Use Construction Npjae Level Noise Level Limit 1 Residential 61 65 2 Industrial 66 NA 3 Residential 63 65 4 Residential 65 65 5 Residential 65 65 6 Industrial 60 NA 7 Residential 61 65 8 Residential 59 65 9 Residential 57 65 10 Residential 56 65 NA=not applicable;standard applies at residential uses only dB A I e =A-weighted decibels one-hour equivalent noise level On-site Noise Compatibility The primary noise sources on-site would be truck activity and roof-mounted heating, ventilation, and air conditioning(HVAC)units. On-site generated noise levels in the city are regulated by Section 17.66.050 of the City's Municipal Code.Table 3 shows that exterior noise levels generated by all on-site noise sources are projected to range from 35 to 47 dB(A)Leq at the adjacent properties. Exterior noise levels would not exceed the daytime or nighttime noise level limits of 65 and 60 dB(A)I q, respectively, at any of the adjacent residential uses.Additionally, assuming a 10 dB exterior to interior noise reduction that would be achieved by residential structures with open windows, interior noise levels at the adjacent residential uses would be reduced to 25 to 37 dB(A)Leq. Interior noise levels would not exceed the daytime or nighttime noise level limits of 50 and 45 dB(A)Leq, respectively, at any of the adjacent residential uses.Therefore, operational on- site generated noise levels would comply with City standards established in Section 17.66.050 of the Municipal Code.Additionally, on-site generated noise levels would not exceed the maximum noise level requirements established in Section 17.66.110 of the Municipal Code. Therefore, impacts associated with on- site generated noise would be less than significant. Mr. Tabs Van der Zwaag Page 7 February 12, 2020 Table 3 Operational On-Site Generated Noise Levels � Noise Level Limit Land Use. ." Modeled Noise Ls_vel Da time/Ni ht '' 1 Residential i i 65/60_ 2 Industrial 49 NA 3 Residential __ 43 65/60 4 Residential 46 _ 65/60 5 Residential _47 65/60 6 Industrial 37 NA 7 Residential 41 65/60 8 Residential 38 65/60 9 Residential 36 65/60 10 Residential 35 65/60 NA=not applicable; standard applies at residential uses only dB(A)I., =A-weighted decibels one-hour equivalent noise level Traffic Noise Industrial land uses are compatible with transportation-related noise levels up to 75 CNEL.The existing ambient noise level on the project site was measured to be approximately 58 dB(A)L,q.Based on the existing noise environment and the fact that the project would generate less vehicle traffic than the existing use,it is anticipated that future ambient noise levels at the project site due to surrounding transportation-related noise sources would be well less than 75 CNEL, and the project would be compatible with General Plan noise standards.Additionally, because the project would generate less traffic than the existing use, off-site traffic noise impacts to existing uses in the vicinity of the project site are also anticipated to be less than the existing condition.Therefore, traffic-related noise impacts to on-site and off-site uses would be less than significant. Air Quality The Air Quality Analysis prepared by RECON determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts related to air quality, including the generation of objectionable odors (RECON 2019b). Air Quality Management Plan The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), who is the air pollution control agency in the SoCAB,prepared the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan(2016 AQMP), which outlines the district's strategy for achieving attainment of federal and state Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). Growth forecasting for the AQMP is based in part on the land uses established by local general plans.As such, if a project is consistent with land use as designated in the local general plan, it can normally be considered consistent with the AQMP.As described in Section 15332(a) above, the project is consistent with the existing General Industrial land use and zoning designations for the project site.Therefore,the emissions associated with the project would be consistent with the growth assumptions in the 2016 AQMP. Another factor used to determine if a project would conflict with implementation of the AQMP is determining if the project would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of National AAQS Mr.Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 8 February 12, 2020 (NAAQS)or California AAQS (CAAQS)or interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. NAAQS and CAAQS violations could occur if project emissions would exceed SCAQMD's regional significance thresholds or SCAQMD's Final Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs).Tables 4 and 5 show that project emissions during construction and operation would not exceed SCAQMD's regional significance thresholds. Additionally, Tables 6 and 7 show that emissions during construction and operation would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs.Therefore,the project would not obstruct or conflict with implementation of the 2016 AQMP, and impacts would be less than significant. ConstructionTable 4 Comparison to SCAQMD Significance Thresholds Emissions ounds er da .. Construction 'F G NOx CO SOx _ PM Demolition 3 34 22 <1 2 2 Site Preparation 4 42 22 <1 11 7 Grading 3 26 17 <1 4 3 Building Construction 2 21 19 <1 2 1 Paving 1 11 13 <1 1 1 Architectural Coatings 9 2 2 <1 <1 <1 Maximum Daily Emissions 9 42 22 <1 11 7 SCA MD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 ROG=reactive organic gases;NOx=nitrogen oxides;CO=carbon monoxide; sox=sulfur oxides;PMio=particulate matter less than 10 microns; PM2.5=particulate matter less than 2.5 microns Table OperationalSummary of Project (pounds Emissions Source 1 ROG NOx CO I SOX PM10 PM2.5 WINTER Area Sources 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Energy Sources <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile Sources—Passenger Cars <1 <1 3 <1 1 <1 Mobile Sources—Trucks <1 12 3 <1 1 <1 Total 3 12 6 <1 3 1 Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Area Sources 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Energy Sources <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile Sources—Passenger Cars <1 <1 3 <1 I <1 Mobile Sources—Trucks <1 12 3 <1 1 <1 Total 3 12 7 <1 3 1 Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Mr.Tabs Van der Zwaag Page 9 February 12, 2020 Table Localized Construction Emissions ' Emissior x PMi Maximum Dail On-Site Emission 22 1 42 10 6 LST Threshold 2193 270 16 9 Threshold Exceeded? No I No No No Emissions co :• NOx PMio PM2 Area and Energy Sources 0.06 0.06 <0.01 <0.01 On-Site Truck Emissions 0.37 1.65 <0.01 <0.01 Total Maximum Dail On-Site Emission 0.42 1.71 0.01 0.01 LST Threshold 2,193 270 4 2 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase of Any Criteria Pollutant Tables 4 and 5 show that project emissions of ozone precursors (ROG and NOx), PMio, and PM2.5 during construction and operation would be below the SCAQMD's thresholds of significance. These thresholds are designed to provide limits below which project emissions from an individual project would not significantly affect regional air quality or the timely attainment of the NAAQS and CAAQS. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in emissions of ozone, PMjo, or PM2.5, and impacts would be less than significant. Sensitive Receptors The SCAQMD's Final LST Methodology was developed as a tool to assist lead agencies to analyze localized air quality impacts to sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the project (SCAQMD 2008a). The LST Methodology outlines how to analyze localized impacts from common pollutants of concern including NO2, CO,PMio, and PM2.5(which includes diesel particulate matter [DPM]). Localized air quality impacts would occur if pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptors exceeded applicable NAAQS or CAAQS. A sensitive receptor is a person in the population who is more susceptible to health effects due to exposure to an air contaminant than is the population at large.Examples of sensitive receptor locations in the community include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, churches, athletic facilities, retirement homes, and long-term health care facilities.The sensitive receptors nearest to the project site include residential uses north, northeast, and southwest of the project site. During construction activities, the project would result in emissions of DPM from construction equipment exhaust.DPM emissions are included in the PM2.5 emissions calculated with CaIEEMod. Table 6 shows that project emissions during construction would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs for any criteria pollutants, including PM2.5.Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial DPM concentrations. Once operational, on-site emissions would result from truck, area, and energy sources. Table 7 shows that project emissions during operation would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs for any criteria pollutants, including PM2.5.Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during construction or operation of the project, and impacts would be less than significant. Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 10 February 12, 2020 Obiectionable Odors Diesel equipment may generate some nuisance odors during construction. Sensitive receptors near the project site include residential uses to the north, northeast, and southwest of the project site. However, exposure to odors associated with project construction would be short term and temporary in nature, and impacts would be less than significant. The following list provides some common types of facilities that are known producers of objectionable odors (Bay Area Air Quality Management District 2010).This list of facilities is not meant to be all-inclusive. • Wastewater Treatment Plant • Fiberglass Manufacturing • Wastewater Pumping Facilities . Painting/Coating Operations • Sanitary Landfill • Rendering Plant • Transfer Station • Coffee Roaster • Composting Facility . Food Processing Facility • Petroleum Refinery . Confined Animal Facility/Feed Lot/Dairy • Asphalt Batch Plant . Green Waste and Recycling Operations • Chemical Manufacturing • Metal Smelting Plants The project does not include any of these uses that are typically associated with odor complaints. The project does not propose any uses or activities that would result in potentially significant operational-source odor impacts.Additionally, SCAQMD Rule 402 acts to prevent occurrences of odor nuisances. Therefore, the project is not expected to generate significant objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people, and impacts would be less than significant. Greenhouse Gases The Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by RECON determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts related to greenhouse gas (GHG)emissions (RECON 2019c). Greenhouse Gas Emissions The Greenhouse Gas Analysis calculated the primary sources of direct and indirect GHG emissions for both the existing truck and trailer repair facility and the project.A comparison of these GHG emissions calculations are presented in Table 8. Table 8 Sununary of Existing and Project GHG Emissions (MT CO2E per year) Existing Truck and Source Trailer Repair Center ,_ Pro'ect _ _ Differp Mobile 112 _ 903 761 EnerRv Source 56 90 34 Area Sources <1 <1 <1 Water/Wastewater Sources 7 106 99 Solid Waste Sources 20 49 30 Construction Amortized over 30 ears 15 15 TOTAL 225 1163 938 MT CO2E=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent Mr.Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 11 February 12, 2020 Table 8 shows that the project would result in a total of 1,163 MT CO2E)per year, which constitutes a net increase of 938 MT CO2E per year over the existing condition.As discussed in Section 4.1 of the Greenhouse Gas Analysis, the City has not adopted its own GHG Thresholds of Significance for CEQA.Therefore, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis evaluated potential impacts based on screening levels recommended in the Interim CEQA GHG Significance Thresholds for Stationary Sources,Rules, and Plans, which identify the applicable SCAQMD screening level for industrial uses as 10,000 MT CO2E (SCAQMD 2008b).As shown in Table 8, project GHG emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD screening level of 10,000 MT CO2E for industrial uses. Therefore, the project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, and impacts would be less than significant. Conflict with AmAicable Plans The City has adopted the Sustainable Community Action Plan, which contains policies and actions to reduce GHG emissions in the City 15 percent below 2008 levels by 2020.However, the City has not adopted its own GHG emissions thresholds of significance for CEQA.As described above, project GHG emissions would be less than the applicable SCAQMD screening level of 10,000 MT CO2E for industrial uses.As discussed in Section 4.1 of the Greenhouse Gas Analysis, the project would achieve consistency with the City's Sustainable Community Action through compliance and adherence to local regulations. Therefore, the project would not conflict with an applicable plan,policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of GHGs, and impacts would be less than significant. Water Quality The project would prevent water quality impacts during construction by implementing best management practices (BMPs)consistent with the regulatory requirements of the City and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES;MS4 Permit).Example construction BMPs include perimeter silt fences, designated and contained storage areas for materials and waste, and on-site materials for spill control or containment.Implementation of BMPs during construction would minimize potential impacts to water quality.As part of the project, the contractor will monitor the water quality BMPs, including conducting routine inspections of disturbed areas to ensure the BMPs remain intact and effective.The project site's permanent drainage plan would be prepared by a registered civil engineer to safely retain, detain, and/or convey storm water runoff to the existing storm drain system. Furthermore, the project is located within a fully urbanized area of the city and is not located near a watercourse.Therefore, impacts related to water quality and runoff would be less than significant. Section 15332(e): The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is currently developed and served by all required utilities and public services.As described in Section 15332(a) above, the project is also consistent with the existing General Industrial land use and zoning designations for the project site.Therefore, the project would be consistent with development projections anticipated by the City's General Plan and would not create unanticipated demand for utilities such as water supply, wastewater treatment, or solid waste disposal. Similarly, consistency with the existing General Industrial land use and zoning designations for the project site would ensure that the project does not generate unanticipated demand for public services such as fire protection,police protection, schools, parks, and libraries. Mr.Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 12 February 12, 2020 Should you have any questions, please contact me at 619-308-9333 x144 or by e-mail at nlarkin@reconenvironmental.com. Sincerely, Nick Larkin Senior Project Manager NHL:sh References Cited Bay Area Air Quality Management District 2010 California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. May. Ganddini Group 2019 8545 Pecan Avenue Project Trip Generation Assessment. 19.0169.Prepared for Xebec Holdings, LLC.August 8. RECON Environmental, Inc.(RECON) 2019a Noise Analysis for the 8545 Pecan Avenue Project.Rancho Cucamonga, California.August 16. 2019b Air Quality Analysis for the 8545 Pecan Avenue Project. Rancho Cucamonga, California.August 14. 2019c Greenhouse Gas Analysis for the 8545 Pecan Avenue Project. Rancho Cucamonga, California. August 21. South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD) 2008a Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology.July. 2008b Draft Guidance Document—Interim CEQA GHG Significance Thresholds for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans. October. • T 510,836.4200 1939 Harrison Street. Ste. 150 www.lozeaudrury.com F 510.836.4205 Oakland. CA 94612 I richard@lozeaudrury.com BY E-MAIL AND HAND DELIVERY February 11, 2020 Chairman Guglielmo Anne McIntosh, Director Vice Chairman Oaxaca Mike Smith, Principal Planner Commissioner Dopp Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Commissioner Morales Planning Department Commissioner Williams City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission 10500 Civic Center Drive c/o Anne McIntosh, Secretary Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City of Rancho Cucamonga anne.mcintoshgcit off 10500 Civic Center Drive michael.smithpcitvofrc.us Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Tabe.vanderZwaagna cit off anne.mcintoshgcitvofrc.us Re: Design Review No. DRC2019-00590: Objection to CEQA Exemption Dear Chairman Guglielmo, Members of the Planning Commission, Ms. McIntosh, Mr. Smith, and Mr. van der Zwaag: I am writing on behalf of the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER") and its members living and/or working in or around the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City")regarding the Xebec Realty warehouse distribution project, Design Review No. 2019- 00590, currently proposed for the parcel on the east side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route, APN 0229-171-02 ("Project"). SAFER objects to the City's proposed Class 32 exemption from review under the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"). SAFER believes that the proposed Project is not exempt from CEQA review and that CEQA review is required to analyze and mitigate the Project's environmental impacts, including impacts on air quality,health risk, greenhouse gas, and other impacts. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Shean Kim for Xebec Realty, is requesting that the Planning Commission review and approve a proposed concrete tilt-up warehouse distribution building approximately 103,945 square feet. The warehouse includes a 95,945 square foot warehouse area, 4,000 square feet of office space on the main floor, and 4,000 square feet of office space within the mezzanine. The loading area, 10 dock doors and trailer parking stalls will be located on the east side of the building. The Project will also include 32 parking spaces for office parking and 47 spaces for warehouse parking. DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 2 of 6 The project site is located on the east side of Pecan Avenue just south of Arrow Route. (APN: 0229-171-02). The project site has a General Plan land use designation of General Industrial (GI). The City asserts the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA as an "in-fill"project (Class 32). II. LEGAL STANDARD CEQA mandates that"the long-term protection of the environment . . . shall be the guiding criterion in public decisions"throughout California. PRC § 21001(d). A "project" is "the whole of an action" directly undertaken, supported, or authorized by a public agency"which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment." PRC § 21065; CEQA Guidelines, 14 CCR § 15378(a). For this reason, CEQA is concerned with an action's ultimate "impact on the environment."Bozung v. LAFCO(1975) 13 Cal.3d 263, 283. CEQA requires environmental factors to be considered at the "earliest possible stage . . . before [the project] gains irreversible momentum," Id. 13 Cal.3d at 277, "at a point in the planning process where genuine flexibility remains."Sundstrom v. Mendocino County(1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 307. To achieve its objectives of environmental protection, CEQA has a three-tiered structure. 14 CCR § 15002(k); Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan v. City of Los Angeles (2008) 161 Cal.AppAth 1168, 1185-86 ("Hollywoodland). First, if a project falls into an exempt category, or it can be seen with certainty that the activity in question will not have a significant effect on the environment, no further agency evaluation is required. Id. Second, if there is a possibility the project will have a significant effect on the environment, the agency must perform an initial threshold study. Id.; 14 CCR § 15063(a). If the study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment the agency may issue a negative declaration. Id., 14 CCR §§ 15063(b)(2), 15070. Finally, if the project will have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report ("EIR") is required. Id. Here, since the City exempted the Project from CEQA entirely, we are at the first step of the CEQA process. 1. CEQA Exemptions. CEQA identifies certain classes of projects which are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. These are called categorical exemptions. 14 CCR §§ 15300, 15354. "Exemptions to CEQA are narrowly construed and"`[e]xemption categories are not to be expanded beyond the reasonable scope of their statutory language."'Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 CalAth 105, 125. The determination as to the appropriate scope of a categorical exemption is a question of law subject to independent, or de novo,review. San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified School Dist., (2006) 139 Cal. App. 4th 1356, 1375 ("[Q]uestions of interpretation or application of the requirements of CEQA are matters of law. (Citations.) Thus, for example, interpreting the scope of a CEQA exemption presents `a question of law, subject to de novo review by this court.' (Citations)." DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 3 of 6 The City asserts the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA as an "in-fill"project(Class 32). 2. Exceptions to CEQA Exemptions. There are several exceptions to the categorical exemptions. 14 CCR § 15300.2. At least two exceptions are relevant here: (1) Significant Effects. A project may never be exempted from CEQA if there is a"fair argument" that the project may have significant environmental impacts due to "unusual circumstances." 14 CCR §15300.2(c). The Supreme Court has held that since the agency may only exempt activities that do not have a significant effect on the environment, a fair argument that a project will have significant effects precludes an exemption. Wildlife Alive v. Chickering(1976) 18 Cal.3d 190, 204. (2) Cumulative Impacts. A project may not be exempted from CEQA review"when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant." 3. Limitations to In-Fill Exemption. The Class 32 In-Fill exemption can only be applied when"[t]he project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species" or where "[ajpproval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality." 14 Cal. Admin. Code §§ 15332(c), (d). The CEQA analysis fails to properly analyze and mitigate impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas, and other impacts. The analysis should be withdrawn, an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") should be prepared, and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. III. ANALYSIS 1. The Project may have Significant Environmental Impacts Related to Air Quality,Precluding Reliance on the Categorical Exemption. CEQA and its regulations provide that certain projects may be exempt. However, "[aJn activity that may have a significant effect on the environment cannot be categorically exempt." Salmon Protectors v. County ofMarin (2004) 125 Cal.AppAth 1098, 1107;Azusa Land Reclamation v. Main San Gabriel Basin (1997) 52 Cal.AppAth 1165, 1191, 1202. CEQA's unique "fair argument" standard applies when reviewing a CEQA exemption. Under the "fair argument" standard, an agency is precluded from relying on a categorical exemption when there is a fair argument that a project will have a significant effect on the environment. Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San Diego ("Bankers Hill") (2006) 139 Cal. App. 4th 249, 266. In other words, "where there is any reasonable possibility that a project or DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 4 of 6 activity may have a significant effect on the environment, an exemption would be improper."Id.; Dunn-Edwards Corp., 9 Cal.AppAth at 654-655. a. The Project may have a Significant Impact to Human Health from Diesel Particulate Matter. The City's documents on the Project fail to evaluate or even mention the potential health risk from diesel particulate matter("DPM") associated with the Project's construction and operation. By failing to prepare a construction or operational health risk assessment("HRA") for existing sensitive receptors, the Project is inconsistent with recommendations set forth by the Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment's ("OEHHA")most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, which was formally adopted in March of 2015. "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https:Hoehha,ca.gov/media/downloads/cmr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. The OEHHA guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA, recommending that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors. Id., p. 8-18. Given that the Project will require site preparation, grading, building construction and architectural coating for the new buildings, and paving throughout the site, it is reasonably assumed that the Project will last over two months. OEHHA guidance also recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than six months should be evaluated for the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident ("MEIR"). Id., pp. 8-6, 8-15. Even though the Project documents fail to provide the expected lifetime of the Project, it can reasonably be assumed that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, the City should evaluate the Project's health risk impacts from construction and operation per OEHHA guidelines. Environmental consulting firm SWAPE reviewed the Project and its associated documents and prepared a screening-level HRA in an effort to demonstrate the potential health risk posed by the Project's construction and operation to nearby, existing sensitive receptors. SWAPE used AERSCREEN,the leading screening-level air quality dispersion model. Ex. A, pp. 3-7. SWAPE calculates that the Project's construction and operation may pose cancer risks to children and infants of approximately 25 and 100 in one million, well above the South Coast Air Quality Management District's ("SCAQMD") threshold of 10 in one million. Id.,p. 6. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime calculated by SWAPE is 140 in one million, resulting in a potentially significant health risk impact. These screening level calculations demonstrate that the Project's construction and operational DPM emissions may result in a potentially significant health risk impact. S WAPE's screening-level HRA analysis and results can be found in Exhibit A, pp. 3-7. b. The Project may have a Significant Impact Related to Greenhouse Gases. The City's documents on the Project fail to demonstrate that the Project would result in less than significant air quality impacts, including greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. SWAPE DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 5 of 6 analyzed the Project and its associated documents and prepared a screening level analysis of the Project's GHG emissions, which indicate a potentially significant impact. SWAPE used Project-specific information to quantify the Project's emissions using the California Emissions Model ("CalEEMod") output files. Ex. A, p. 8. SWAPE concluded that the Project's GHG emissions will include approximately 474.5 MT CO2e of total construction emissions and approximately 1,374.29 MT CO2e/year of annual operational emissions.Id. SWAPE then calculated the Project's service population in order to compare the Project's emissions with the SCAQMD's substantial progress service population efficiency threshold, concluding that the Project will emit approximately 34.75 MT CO2e/SP/year, which greatly exceeds the SCAQMD's 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year. Id. This exceedance of the SCAQMD's 2035 service population efficiency threshold therefore results in a significant impact, requiring an EIR in order to adequately assess and mitigation potential GHG impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. 2. The Project may have Significant Cumulative Impacts. As shown above, the construction and operation of a 103,945 square foot warehouse building is likely to create significant adverse air quality impacts related to construction equipment, and operational emissions from diesel trucks and other vehicles associated with the Project. The Project therefore may also have significant cumulative air quality impacts when considered together with the many other similar projects nearby. Review of the Project site and surrounding areas demonstrates that the Project is located within close proximity of over a dozen industrial facilities. These projects will have a significant cumulative impact when considered together with the proposed Project. Recognizing that several projects may together have a considerable impact, CEQA requires an agency to consider the"cumulative impacts" of a project along with other projects in the area. Pub. Resources Code §21083(b); CEQA Guidelines §15355(b). If a project may have cumulative impacts, the agency must prepare an EIR, since"a project may have a significant effect on the environment if`[t]he possible effects of a project are individually limited but cumulatively considerable."' Communities for a Better Environment v. Calif. Res. Agency, 103 Cal.AppAth at 98, 114; Kings County Farm Bur. v. City of Hanford(1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692, 721. It is vital that an agency assess"`the environmental damage [that] often occurs incrementally from a variety of small sources . . ."'Bakersfield Citizens For Local Control v. City of Bakersfield(2004) 124 Cal.AppAth 1184, 1214. "[U]nder CEQA, the lead agency bears a burden to investigate potential environmental impacts. `If the local agency has failed to study an area of possible environmental impact, a fair argument may be based on the limited facts in the record. Deficiencies in the record may actually enlarge the scope of fair argument by lending a logical plausibility to a wider range of inferences.' (Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal. App. 3d 296, 311; County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. County of Kern (2005) 127 Cal. App. 4th 1544) DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 6 of 6 IV. Conclusion For the above reasons, the CEQA Analysis for the Project and its reliance on the stated exemptions should be withdrawn, an EIR should be prepared, and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. Thank you for considering these comments. Sincerely, Richard Drury LOZEAU DRURY LLP Exhibit A S W A P E Technical Consultation,Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 291"Street,Suite 201 Santa Monica,CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G,C.Hg. (949)887-9013 mhaaemann@swape.com Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD (310)795-2335 prosenfeld@swape.com February 10, 2020 Paige Fennie Lozeau I Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, CA 94612 Subject: Comments on the Xebec Warehouse Project Dear Ms. Fennie, We have reviewed the December 2019 Design Review Committee Agenda ("DR")for the Xebec Warehouse Project("Project") located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City").The Project proposes to construct a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building as well as 79 parking spaces and 30 trailer parking spaces on the 4.75-acre site. Our review concludes that the DR fails to adequately evaluate the Project's Air Quality, Health Risk, and Greenhouse Gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. Our analysis, as described herein,demonstrates that there are potentially significant impacts that were not evaluated in the provided documents.An EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. As a result of our findings, the proposed Proiect does not qualify for o Class 32 Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA")and 14 Cal. Code of Reas. 1500 et sea. ("CEQA Guidelines')and, therefore, a full CEQA analysis must be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the Proiect may have on the surrounding environment. We recommend that the City prepare an environmental impact report("EIR') with a health risk assessment("HRA')as required under the Commerce Municipal Code("CMC"or "Code" Air Quality Incorrect Reliance on Class 32 Categorical Exemption The DR claims that the Project is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines§ 15332 (p.001). According to CEQA Guidelines§ 15332(d),a project can only qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption if"approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality."' However, the City fails to provide any quantified analysis of air quality, health risk, noise,or water quality impacts resulting from the Project's construction and operation. In addition, SWAPE's analysis demonstrates that their air quality, health risk,and greenhouse gas impacts may be potentially significant.As a result, the proposed Project fails to adequately evaluate and disclose potential air quality, health risk, noise,and water quality impacts that Project construction and operation may have on the surrounding environment.Thus,the Class 32 exemption is unsubstantiated, and an EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated Review of the Project documents demonstrates that the documents fail to evaluate or mention the potential health risk associated with Project activities.Without a health risk analysis (HRA),we cannot verify that Project-related impacts are less than significant. By failing to prepare a construction or operational HRA for existing sensitive receptors, the Project is inconsistent with recommendations set forth by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment("OEHHA"),the organization responsible for providing recommendations for health risk assessments in California. In February of 2015,OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments,which was formally adopted in March of 2015.1 This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. Construction of the Project will produce emissions of diesel particulate matter("DPM"), a human carcinogen,through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment.The OEHHA document recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors.;Although the Project documents fail to disclose the anticipated duration of construction,we can reasonably assume that it will last over two months,given the Project will require site preparation, grading, building construction and architectural coating for the new buildings,and paving throughout the site.Therefore, per OEHHA guidelines, we recommend that health risk impacts from Project construction be evaluated. Additionally,once construction is complete,the Project will operate for a long period of time. During operation,the Project will generate vehicle and truck trips, which will produce additional exhaust emissions,thus continuing to expose nearby sensitive receptors to emissions.The OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than six months should be evaluated for the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate 'CEQA Guidelines§15332(c),available at:httos://resources.ca.goy/ceoa/guidelines/artl9.htmi. 'OEHHA(February 2015) Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments,httos://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 'lbid, p.8-18. 2 individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident("MEIR").4 Even though the Project documents fail to provide the expected lifetime of the Project,we can reasonably assume that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more.Therefore,we recommend that health risks from Project operation also be evaluated, as a 30-year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 2-month and 6- month requirements set forth by OEHHA.These recommendations reflect the most recent health risk policy,and as such, we recommend that an assessment of health risks to nearby sensitive receptors from construction and operation be included in an air quality impact evaluation for the Project. Furthermore, by claiming a less than significant impact without conducting a quantified HRA for nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction and operation,the DR fails to compare the excess health risk to the SCAQMD's specific numeric threshold of ten in one million.'Thus, the Project cannot conclude less than significant air quality impacts resulting from Project construction and operation without quantifying emissions to compare to the proper threshold. Screening-Level Analysis Demonstrates Significant Impacts In an effort to demonstrate the potential health risk posed by Project construction and operation to nearby, existing sensitive receptors, we prepared a simple screening-level HRA.The results of our assessment, as described below, demonstrate that the Project may result in a significant impact. In order to conduct our screening-level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN,which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.'The model replaced SCREEN3,and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA7 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (CAPCOA)a guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments ("HRSAs").A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN,a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project. We prepared a SWAPE CalEEMod model for the Project, using the Project-specific information provided by the DR. We included half of the warehouse land use as refrigerated warehouse no-rail and half as unrefrigerated no-rail, as the warehouse type was not specified by the DR. We also included 500 square feet of other non-asphalt surfaces to account for the 500 square foot outdoor eating area indicated by the DR. Finally,we included 237 daily trips, as indicated by the DR(p.4). All other values were left as defaults. Utilizing this model, we prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project's construction and operational health-related impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PMio exhaust 4 ibid.,p.8-6,8-15 '"South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds."SCAQMD,April 2019,available at., http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceaa/handbook/`scagmd-air-a uality-significa nce- t h re s h o l d s.p d f?s fv rs n=2. 6 U.S. EPA(April 2011)AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model, http://www.epa.goy/ttn/scram/guidance/clarification/20110411 AERSCREEN Release Memo.pdf 'Supra,fn 20. e CAPCOA(July 2009)Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA HRA LU Guidelines 8-6-09.odf. 3 estimates from the SWAPE annual CalEEMod output files. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA,we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life.The Project's construction CalEEMod output files indicate that construction activities will generate approximately 284 pounds of diesel particulate matter(DPM).The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources.To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction,we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation: (grams, _ 284.4 lbs 453.E grams 1 day 1 hour Emission Rate \second) 418 days x lbs x 24 hours x 3,600 seconds — 0.00357 g/s Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.00357 grams per second (g/s). Subtracting the 418-day construction duration from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction the MEIR would be exposed to the Project's operational DPM for an additional 28.85 years, approximately.The Project's operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 28 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation: grams 27.8 ibs 453.6 grams 1 day 1 hour _ Emission Rate (second) 365 days x lbs x 24 hours x 3'600 seconds — 0.0004 g/s Using this equation,we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.0004 g/s. Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 4.75-acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN with dimensions of 198 meters by 97 meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model-default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single-hour DPM concentrations from the Project site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures,the annualized average g concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single-hour concentration by 10%.9 According to the DR,there are single family residences to the north of the Project site (DR, p.001). Review of Google Earth demonstrates that these sensitive receptors are less than 25 meters from the edge of the Project site. However, the maximally exposed receptor is not always the closest receptor. Thus,the maximum single-hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 6.142 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 100 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%,we get an annualized average concentration of 0.6142 µg/m3 for Project 9"Screening Prpcedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised." EPA, 1992,available at:http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019 OCR.pdf;see also"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf.p.4-36 4 construction at the maximally exposed sensitive receptor. For Project operation,the single-hour concentration is estimated by AERSCREEN is approximately 0.6875 µg/m3at approximately 100 meters downwind. Multiplying this single-hour concentration by 10%,we get an annualized average concentration of 0.06875 µg/m3 for Project operation at the maximally exposed sensitive receptor. We calculated the excess cancer risk to the maximally exposed residential receptors using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA and the SCAQMD.Consistent with the default CaIEEMod construction schedule,the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy(0.25 years) and for 0.90 years of the infantile stage of life (0-2 years).The annualized average concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30-year exposure period, including the remainder of the infantile stage of life,child stage of life (2-16 years), and adult stage of life (16-30 years). Consistent with OEHHA,SCAQMD, BAAQMD, and SJVAPCD guidance, we used Age Sensitivity Factors (ASFs)to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution.10,11,12,13 According to the above-referenced guidance,we recommend that the quantified cancer risk be multiplied by a factor of ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and during the infant stage of life(0 to 2 years)and multiplied by a factor of three during the child stage of life (2 to 16 years). However, while we recommend this methodology as the most health-protective analysis,we also included the quantified cancer risk without adjusting for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution in accordance with older OEHHA guidance from 2003.This guidance utilizes a less health protective scenario than what is currently recommended by the SCAQMD, the air quality district responsible for the City, and several other air districts in the state. In order to evaluate impacts most conservatively,we strongly recommend the use of age sensitivity factors as is recommended by the most recent guidance. Furthermore, in accordance with guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used the 95`h percentile breathing rates for infants.14 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 10"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015,available at:httr)s://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.t)df. 11"Draft Environmental Impact Report(DEIR)for the Proposed The Exchange(SCH No.2018071058)."SCAQMD, March 2019,available at:htto://www.acimd.gov/docs/default-source/ceaa/comment- letters/2019/march/RVC190115-03.pdf?sfvrsn=8, p.4. 11"California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines." BAAQMD, May 2017,available at: http://www.baaamd.gov/-/media/files/planning-and-research/ceaa/ceaa guidelines mav2017-r)df.pdf?la=en,p. 56;see also"Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards." BAAQMD, May 2011, available at: htti)://www.baacimd.gov/-/media/Files/Planning%20and%20Research/CEQA/BAAQMD%20Modeling%20APproac h p.65,86. 13"Update to District's Risk Management Policy to Address OEHHA's Revised Risk Assessment Guidance Document."SJVAPCD, May 2015,available at:https://www.valleyair.org/busind/pto/staff-report-5-28-15.pdf, p.8, 20,24. 14"Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act,"June 5,2015,available at:http://www.aamd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/ab2588-risk-assessment-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 19. "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015,available at:httr)s://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf 5 (mg/kg-day)'1 and an averaging time of 25,550 days.OEHHA recommends that a 30-year exposure duration be used as the basis for estimating cancer risk at the MEIR.15 Consistent with OEHHA guidance, exposure to the MEIR was assumed to begin in the third trimester of pregnancy to provide the most conservative estimate of air quality hazards. Finally, according to SCAQMD guidance,we used a Fraction of Time At Home (FAH)Value of 1 for the 3rd trimester and infant receptors.16 The results of our calculations are shown in the table below. The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Breathing Cancer Duration Concentration Risk Cancer Risk Activity (years) (ug/m3) RatdeaY;kg- without ASF with ASFs* ASFs* Construction 0.25 0.6142 361 8.4E-07 10 8.4E-06 3rd Trimester 3rd Duration 0.25 8.4E-07 Trimester 8.4E-06 Exposure Construction 0.90 0.6142 1090 9.0E-06 10 9.0E-05 Operation 1.10 0.06875 1090 1.2E-06 10 1.2E-05 Infant Exposure 2.00 1.0E-05 Infant 1.0E-04 Duration Exposure Operation 14.00 0.06875 572 8.3E-06 3 2.5E-05 Child Exposure Child 14.00 8.3E-06 1.5E-05 Duration Exposure Operation 14.00 0.06875 261 2.8E-06 1 2.8E-06 Adult Exposure 14.00 2.8E-06 Adult 2,8E-06 Duration Exposure Lifetime Exposure 30.00 2.2E-05 Lifetime 1.4E-04 Duration Exposure *We,along with CARB and SCAQMD,recommend using the more updated and health protective 2015 OEHHAguidance,which includes ASFs. As indicated in the table above,the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the third trimester of pregnancy at the maximally exposed residential receptor, located approximately 100 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, utilizing age sensitivity factors, are approximately 2.8, 25, 100, and 8.4 in one million, respectively.The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime(30 years) at the maximally exposed residential receptor, utilizing age sensitivity factors, is approximately 140 in one million.The adult, child, infant, and lifetime cancer risks, utilizing age sensitivity factors,exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the DR. Utilizing age sensitivity factors is the most conservative, health-protective analysis according to the most recent guidance by OEHHA and "" Risk Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for preparation of Health Risk Assessments."OEHHA, February 2015, available at:httas://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanuaLI dt p.8-6. to"Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, and 212."SCAQMD,August 2017,available at: htto://www.aamd.gov/dots/defa ult-sou rce/ru le-book/Pr000sed- Rules/1401/riskassessmentorocedures 2017 080717.odf.p.7. 6 recommendations from the air district. Results without age sensitivity factors are presented in the table above, although we do not recommend utilizing these values for health risk analysis. Regardless,the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the third trimester of pregnancy at the maximally exposed residential receptor, located approximately 100 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation,without age sensitivity factors,are approximately 2.8, 8.3, 10, and 0.84 in one million, respectively.The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years)at the maximally exposed residential receptor,without age sensitivity factors, is approximately 22 in one million.The adult, child, infant, and lifetime cancer risks,without age sensitivity factors, exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million,thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the DR.While we recommend the use of age sensitivity factors, health risk impacts exceed the SCAQMD threshold regardless. Failure to Consider Cumulative Impacts The DR fails to evaluate the cumulative impacts resulting from nearby industrial land uses. As a result, the cumulative risk posed to nearby sensitive receptors to the Project in conjunction with the surrounding existing sources of toxic air contaminants("TAC(s)") is unknown.Therefore,the proposed Project may result in a significant air quality impact that has not been previously identified or addressed. According to CEQA Guidelines§ 15355, "'Cumulative impacts' refers to two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts" CEQA Guidelines§ 15064(h)(1)goes onto say, "... the lead agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable.An EIR must be prepared if the cumulative impact may be significant and the proiect's incremental effect, though individually limited, is cumulatively considerable. 'Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects" (Emphasis added). Thus, the proposed Project may result in a cumulatively considerable impact when considered in conjunction with nearby industrial facilities. Review of the Project site on Google Earth demonstrates that the proposed Project is located in close proximity to the Goodman Logistics Center, Heartland Express trucking, Acra Machinery, an ARCO gas station, Legend Transportation trucking,T& R Lumber, Cruz Truck Parts, DP Rancho Cucamonga DC distributing, UFF T Truck&Trailer Repair,South Bay International, Inc. manufacturing, Pacific Coast Recycling,Aguilar Trucking,Vista Metals Corporation, and more.Therefore, construction and operation of the proposed Project will occur in conjunction with the operation of these other existing industrial facilities. As a result,and prior to Project approval, we recommend the cumulative health risk be evaluated for sensitive receptors near the proposed Project. Greenhouse Gas Failure to Adequately Evaluate the Project's Greenhouse Gas Impacts As discussed above,the DR and associated documents fail to demonstrate that the Project would result in less than significant air quality and health risk impacts.Thus,the DR's claim that the Project is exempt 7 pursuant to CEQA Guidelines§ 15332(d)should not be relied upon.As a result, an EIR should be prepared evaluating the Project's potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.Thus,we have prepared a screening level analysis of the Project's GHG emissions that indicates a potentially significant GHG impact,as shown below. Screening Level Analysis Indicates a Potentially Significant GHG Impact Applicable thresholds and modeling demonstrate that the proposed Project will result in a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the DR.The CaIEEMod output files, modeled by SWAPE utilizing Project-specific information as disclosed in the DR, quantify the Project's emissions, which include approximately 474.5 MT CO2e of total construction emissions and approximately 1,374.29 MT CO2e/year of annual operational emissions(sum of area,energy, mobile,waste, and water-related emissions). In order to compare the Project's emissions with the SCAQMD's substantial progress service population efficiency threshold of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, we calculated the Project's service population. According to CAPCOA's CEQA& Climate Change report, a service population is defined as"the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project."17 As the Project is has no residential land uses,we assumed a residential service population of zero.Assuming that the Project would include a warehouse land use, we calculated a service population of 40 employees based on SCAG's Employment Density Study Summary Report for San Bernadino.11 When dividing the Project's GHG emissions by a service population value of 40 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 34.75 MT CO2e/SP/year.11 This exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, as well as the inapplicable SCAQMD 2020 efficiency target of 4.8 MT CO2e/SP/year. SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Proposed Project Phase Project (MT CO2e/year) Construction (amortized over 30 years) 15.82 Area 0.01 Energy 857.20 Mobile 335.16 Waste 49.13 Water 132.79 Total 2,390.11 Service Population 40 17 CAPCOA(Jan. 2008)CEQA&Climate Change, p.71-72, http://www.capcoa.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ CAPCOA-White-Paper.pdf. "Service Population=Residents+Employees=0+40=40; Employees=(103,945 square feet) +(2,616 square feet per employee)=approximately 40 employees,see "Employment Density Study Summary Report."SCAG,October 2001,available at: https://www.google.com/url?a=http://www.mwcog.org/file.aspx?A%3DQT r[TR24P000UIw5mPNzKBF4d8didJe4L F9Exi6lXOU%253D&sa=D&source=hangouts&ust=1581123997890000&usg=AFQiCNEiH DfCOmGetH3u npvbGD7HxV no30, p. 22,Table 7B. 19 Calculated:(1,390.11 MT CO2e/year)/(40 service population)_(34.75 MT CO2e/SP/year). 8 Service Population Efficiency 34.75 Threshold 3 Exceed? Yes As the table above demonstrates,when Project GHG emissions are modeled, they exceed the SCAQMU 2035 service population efficiency threshold of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year,thus resulting in a significant impact not previously assessed or identified in the DR. As a result, an EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential greenhouse gas impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project.Additional information may become available in the future;thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty,expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work,work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results,and findings presented.This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties. Sincerely, -W /-/ Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. ((,. I C.�� ('�A Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. 9 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.52359E+00 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57377E+00 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61568E+00 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65053E+00 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.68748E+00 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49658E+00 125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36242E+00 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29565E+00 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24761E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21162E+00 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18377E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16176E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14399E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12923E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11704E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10664E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97783E-01 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90094E-01 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83395E-01 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.77557E-01 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72417E-01 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67776E-01 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63627E-01 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59914E-01 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56573E-01 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53554E-01 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50780E-01 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48248E-01 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45934E-01 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43811E-01 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41842E-01 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40023E-01 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38340E-01 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36780E-01 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35322E-01 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33952E-01 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32674E-01 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31478E-01 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30359E-01 950.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29304E-01 975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28313E-01 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27380E-01 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1. 50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26501E-01 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25669E-01 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24883E-01 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24138E-01 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23427E-01 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22753E-01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22112E-01 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21501E-01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20918E-01 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20360E-01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19828E-01 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19319E-01 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18832E-01 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18367E-01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17922E-01 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17495E-01 1425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17086E-01 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16693E-01 1475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16315E-01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15952E-01 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15603E-01 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15267E-01 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14944E-01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14632E-01 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14331E-01 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14041E-01 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13762E-01 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13492E-01 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13230E-01 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12977E-01 1775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12733E-01 1800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12586E-01 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12354E-01 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12129E-01 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11911E-01 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11699E-01 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11494E-01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11295E-01 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11102E-01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10915E-01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10733E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10556E-01 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10385E-01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10217E-01 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10055E-01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98972E-02 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97434E-02 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95938E-02 2225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94481E-02 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.93062E-02 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91679E-02 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90332E-02 2325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89018E-02 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87737E-02 2375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86488E-02 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85270E-02 2425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84080E-02 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.82920E-02 2475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81786E-02 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80679E-02 2525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79598E-02 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78542E-02 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.77510E-02 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76501E-02 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75515E-02 2650.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74550E-02 2675.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73607E-02 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72684E-02 2725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71781E-02 2750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70897E-02 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70032E-02 2800.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69184E-02 2825.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68355E-02 2850.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67543E-02 2875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66747E-02 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65967E-02 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65203E-02 2950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64454E-02 2975.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63720E-02 3000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63000E-02 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0. 50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62295E-02 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61603E-02 3074.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60924E-02 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60258E-02 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59604E-02 3150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58963E-02 3174.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58333E-02 3200.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57715E-02 3225.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57108E-02 3250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56512E-02 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55927E-02 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55353E-02 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54788E-02 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54233E-02 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53689E-02 3400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53153E-02 3425.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52627E-02 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52109E-02 3475.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51600E-02 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51100E-02 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50609E-02 3550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50125E-02 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49649E-02 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49181E-02 3625.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48721E-02 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48268E-02 3675.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47822E-02 3700.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47384E-02 3725.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46952E-02 3750.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46527E-02 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46109E-02 3800.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45697E-02 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45291E-02 3849.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44892E-02 3875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44499E-02 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44111E-02 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43730E-02 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43354E-02 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42984E-02 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42619E-02 4025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42259E-02 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41905E-02 4075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41556E-02 4100.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41212E-02 4125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40872E-02 4150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40538E-02 4175.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40208E-02 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39883E-02 4225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39562E-02 4250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39246E-02 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38934E-02 4300.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38627E-02 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38324E-02 4350.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38024E-02 4375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37729E-02 4400.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37438E-02 4425.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37150E-02 4449.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36867E-02 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36587E-02 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36310E-02 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36038E-02 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35769E-02 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35503E-02 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35241E-02 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34982E-02 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34726E-02 4675.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34474E-02 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34225E-02 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33979E-02 4750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33735E-02 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33495E-02 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33258E-02 4825.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33024E-02 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32792E-02 4875.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32564E-02 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32338E-02 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32115E-02 4950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31894E-02 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31676E-02 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 AERSCREEN 16216 / AERMOD 19191 02/10/20 08: 15:01 TITLE: Xebec Warehouse Project Operation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS **************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.400E-03 g/s 0.317E-02 lb/hr AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.208E-07 g/(s-m2) 0.165E-06 lb/(hr-m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 198.00 meters 649.61 feet AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 97.00 meters 318.24 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN POPULATION: 177452 INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON-POINT SOURCES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************** FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR Zo SURFACE 1-HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD ----------------------------------------------------- 1* 1.000 0.6875 0 100.0 WIN * = worst case diagonal ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - - -- - - ********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 250.0 / 310.0 (K) MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/S ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Winter ALBEDO: 0.35 BOWEN RATIO: 1.50 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters) SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ------------------------------------------------------------- YR MO DY 3DY HR 10 01 10 10 01 HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 310.0 2.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES ********************** OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM MAXIMUM DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC (m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3) --------------------- --------------------- 1.00 0.5236 2525.00 0.8068E-02 25.00 0.5738 2550.00 0.7960E-02 50.00 0.6157 2575.00 0.7854E-02 75.00 0.6505 2600.00 0.7751E-02 100.00 0.6875 2625.00 0.7650E-02 125.00 0.4966 2650.00 0.7551E-02 150.00 0.3624 2675.00 0.7455E-02 175.00 0.2957 2700.00 0.7361E-02 200.00 0.2476 2725.00 0.7268E-02 225.00 0.2116 2750.00 0.7178E-02 250.00 0.1838 2775.00 0.7090E-02 275.00 0.1618 2800.00 0.7003E-02 300.00 0.1440 2825.00 0.6918E-02 325.00 0.1292 2850.00 0.6836E-02 350.00 0.1170 2875.00 0.6754E-02 375.00 0.1066 2900.00 0.6675E-02 400.00 0.9778E-01 2925.00 0.6597E-02 425.00 0.9009E-01 2950.00 0.6520E-02 450.00 0.8339E-01 2975.00 0.6445E-02 475.00 0.7756E-01 3000.00 0.6372E-02 500.00 0.7242E-01 3025.00 0.6300E-02 525.00 0.6778E-01 3050.00 0.6229E-02 550.00 0.6363E-01 3074.99 0.6160E-02 575.00 0.5991E-01 3100.00 0.6092E-02 600.00 0.5657E-01 3125.00 0.6026E-02 625.00 0.5355E-01 3150.00 0.5960E-02 650.00 0.5078E-01 3174.99 0.5896E-02 675.00 0.4825E-01 3200.00 0.5833E-02 700.00 0.4593E-01 3225.00 0.5772E-02 725.00 0.4381E-01 3250.00 0.5711E-02 750.00 0.4184E-01 3275.00 0.5651E-02 775.00 0.4002E-01 3300.00 0.5593E-02 800.00 0.3834E-01 3325.00 0.5535E-02 825.00 0.3678E-01 3350.00 0.5479E-02 850.00 0.3532E-01 3375.00 0.5423E-02 875.00 0.3395E-01 3400.00 0.5369E-02 900.00 0.3267E-01 3425.00 0.5315E-02 925.00 0.3148E-01 3450.00 0.5263E-02 950.01 0.3036E-01 3475.00 0.5211E-02 975.00 0.2930E-01 3500.00 0.5160E-02 1000.00 0.2831E-01 3525.00 0.5110E-02 1025.00 0.2738E-01 3550.00 0.5061E-02 1050.00 0.2650E-01 3575.00 0.5012E-02 1075.00 0.2567E-01 3600.00 0.4965E-02 1100.00 0.2488E-01 3625.00 0.4918E-02 1125.00 0.2414E-01 3650.00 0.4872E-02 1150.00 0.2343E-01 3675.00 0.4827E-02 1175.00 0.2275E-01 3700.00 0.4782E-02 1200.00 0.2211E-01 3725.00 0.4738E-02 1225.00 0.2150E-01 3750.00 0.4695E-02 1250.00 0.2092E-01 3775.00 0.4653E-02 1275.00 0.2036E-01 3800.00 0.4611E-02 1300.00 0.1983E-01 3825.00 0.4570E-02 1325.00 0.1932E-01 3849.99 0.4529E-02 1350.00 0.1883E-01 3875.00 0.4489E-02 1375.00 0.1837E-01 3900.00 0.4450E-02 1400.00 0.1792E-01 3925.00 0.4411E-02 1425.00 0.1750E-01 3950.00 0.4373E-02 1450.00 0.1709E-01 3975.00 0.4335E-02 1475.00 0.1669E-01 4000.00 0.4298E-02 1500.00 0.1632E-01 4025.00 0.4262E-02 1525.00 0.1595E-01 4050.00 0.4226E-02 1550.00 0.1560E-01 4075.00 0.4190E-02 1575.00 0.1527E-01 4100.00 0.4156E-02 1600.00 0.1494E-01 4125.00 0.4121E-02 1625.00 0.1463E-01 4150.00 0.4087E-02 1650.00 0.1433E-01 4175.00 0.4054E-02 1675.00 0.1404E-01 4200.00 0.4021E-02 1700.00 0.1376E-01 4225.00 0.3988E-02 1725.00 0.1349E-01 4250.00 0.3956E-02 1750.00 0.1323E-01 4275.00 0.3925E-02 1775.00 0.1298E-01 4300.00 0.3893E-02 1800.00 0.1273E-01 4325.00 0.3863E-02 1825.00 0.1259E-01 4350.00 0.3832E-02 1850.00 0.1235E-01 4375.00 0.3802E-02 1875.00 0.1213E-01 4400.00 0.3773E-02 1900.00 0.1191E-01 4425.00 0.3744E-02 1925.00 0.1170E-01 4449.99 0.3715E-02 1950.00 0.1149E-01 4475.00 0.3687E-02 1975.00 0.1130E-01 4500.00 0.3659E-02 2000.00 0.1110E-01 4525.00 0.3631E-02 2025.00 0.1091E-01 4550.00 0.3604E-02 2050.00 0.1073E-01 4575.00 0.3577E-02 2075.00 0.1056E-01 4600.00 0.3550E-02 2100.00 0.1038E-01 4625.00 0.3524E-02 2125.00 0.1022E-01 4650.00 0.3498E-02 2150.00 0.1006E-01 4675.00 0.3473E-02 2175.00 0.9897E-02 4700.00 0.3447E-02 2200.00 0.9743E-02 4725.00 0.3422E-02 2225.00 0.9594E-02 4750.00 0.3398E-02 2250.00 0.9448E-02 4775.00 0.3374E-02 2275.00 0.9306E-02 4800.00 0.3350E-02 2300.00 0.9168E-02 4825.00 0.3326E-02 2325.00 0.9033E-02 4850.00 0.3302E-02 2350.00 0.8902E-02 4875.00 0.3279E-02 2375.00 0.8774E-02 4900.00 0.3256E-02 2400.00 0.8649E-02 4924.99 0.3234E-02 2425.00 0.8527E-02 4950.00 0.3211E-02 2450.00 0.8408E-02 4975.00 0.3189E-02 2475.00 0.8292E-02 5000.00 0.3168E-02 2500.00 0.8179E-02 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4) Report number EPA-454/R-92-019 http://www.epa.gov/scramOOl/guidance_permit.htm under Screening Guidance MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- FLAT TERRAIN 0.6875 0.6875 0.6875 0.6875 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 100.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.5236 0.5236 0.5236 0.5236 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.46776E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51259E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55003E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58117E+01 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.61417E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.S0 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44363E+01 125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32378E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26412E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22121E+01 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18906E+01 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16418E+01 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14451E+01 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12863E+01 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11545E+01 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10456E+01 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95267E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87356E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80487E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74503E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69287E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64696E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60549E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56842E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53525E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50541E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47844E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45365E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43104E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41036E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39139E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37380E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35755E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34252E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32858E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31556E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30332E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29190E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28121E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27122E+00 950.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26179E+00 975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25294E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24461E+00 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23675E+00 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22932E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22230E+00 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21564E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20930E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20327E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19754E+00 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19209E+00 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18688E+00 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18189E+00 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17713E+00 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17259E+00 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16824E+00 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16409E+00 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16011E+00 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1,000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15630E+00 1425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15264E+00 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14913E+00 1475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14575E+00 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14251E+00 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13939E+00 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13639E+00 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13350E+00 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13072E+00 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12803E+00 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12544E+00 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12294E+00 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12053E+00 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11819E+00 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11593E+00 1775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11375E+00 1800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11244E+00 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11037E+00 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10836E+00 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10641E+00 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10452E+00 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10269E+00 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10091E+00 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.99185E-01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97511E-01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95886E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94307E-01 2075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92772E-01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91280E-01 2125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89829E-01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88418E-01 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87045E-01 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85708E-01 2225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84406E-01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83139E-01 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81903E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80700E-01 2325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79526E-01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78382E-01 2375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.77266E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76177E-01 2425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75115E-01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74078E-01 2475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73065E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72077E-01 2525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71111E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70167E-01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69245E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68344E-01 2625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67463E-01 2650.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66601E-01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65758E-01 2700.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64933E-01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64127E-01 2750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63337E-01 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62564E-01 2800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61807E-01 2825.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61067E-01 2850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60341E-01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59630E-01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58933E-01 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58251E-01 2950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57582E-01 2975.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56926E-01 3000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56283E-01 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55652E-01 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55034E-01 3074.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54428E-01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53832E-01 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53248E-01 3150.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52676E-01 3174.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52113E-01 3199.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51561E-01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51019E-01 3250.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50487E-01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49964E-01 3300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49451E-01 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48946E-01 3350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48451E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47964E-01 3400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47485E-01 3425.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47015E-01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46553E-01 3475.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46098E-01 3500.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45652E-01 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45212E-01 3550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44780E-01 3575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44355E-01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43937E-01 3625.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43526E-01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43121E-01 3675.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42723E-01 3700.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42331E-01 3724.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41945E-01 3750.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41566E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41192E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40824E-01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40462E-01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40105E-01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39754E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39408E-01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39067E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38731E-01 3975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38400E-01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38074E-01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37753E-01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37437E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37125E-01 4100.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36817E-01 4125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36514E-01 4150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36215E-01 4175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35921E-01 4200.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35630E-01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35344E-01 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35061E-01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34783E-01 4300.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34508E-01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34237E-01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33970E-01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33706E-01 4400.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33446E-01 4425.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33189E-01 4449.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32936E-01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32686E-01 4500.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32439E-01 4525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32195E-01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31955E-01 4575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31717E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31483E-01 4625.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31252E-01 4650.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31024E-01 4675.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30798E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30575E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30355E-01 4750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30138E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29924E-01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29712E-01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29502E-01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29296E-01 4875.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29091E-01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28890E-01 4925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28690E-01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28493E-01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28299E-01 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 AERSCREEN 16216 / AERMOD 19191 02/06/20 12:27:12 TITLE: Xebec Warehouse Construction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS **************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE EMISSION RATE: 0.357E-02 g/s 0.283E-01 lb/hr AREA EMISSION RATE: 0.186E-06 g/(s-m2) 0.148E-05 lb/(hr-m2) AREA HEIGHT: 3.00 meters 9.84 feet AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: 198.00 meters 649.61 feet AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: 97.00 meters 318.24 feet INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION: 1.50 meters 4.92 feet RURAL OR URBAN: URBAN POPULATION: 177452 INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 5000. meters 16404. feet ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON-POINT SOURCES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************** FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR Zo SURFACE 1-HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD ----------------------------------------------------- 1* 1.000 6.142 0 100.0 WIN * = worst case diagonal ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: 250.0 / 310.0 (K) MINIMUM WIND SPEED: 0.5 m/s ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Winter ALBEDO: 0.35 BOWEN RATIO: 1.50 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters) SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ------------------------------------------------------------- YR MO DY 3DY HR 10 01 10 10 01 HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 310.0 2.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES ********************** OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM MAXIMUM DIST 1-HR CONC DIST 1-HR CONC (m) (ug/m3) (m) (ug/m3) --------------------- --------------------- 1.00 4.678 2525.00 0.7208E-01 25.00 5.126 2550.00 0.7111E-01 50.00 5.500 2575.00 0.7017E-01 75.00 5.812 2600.00 0.6925E-01 100.00 6.142 2625.00 0.6834E-01 125.00 4.436 2650.00 0.6746E-01 150.00 3.238 2675.00 0.6660E-01 175.00 2.641 2700.00 0.6576E-01 200.00 2.212 2725.00 0.6493E-01 225.00 1.891 2750.00 0.6413E-01 250.00 1.642 2775.00 0.6334E-01 275.00 1.445 2800.00 0.6256E-01 300.00 1.286 2825.00 0.6181E-01 325.00 1.154 2850.00 0.6107E-01 350.00 1.046 2875.00 0.6034E-01 375.00 0.9527 2900.00 0.5963E-01 400.00 0.8736 2925.00 0.5893E-01 425.00 0.8049 2950.00 0.5825E-01 450.00 0.7450 2975.00 0.5758E-01 475.00 0.6929 3000.00 0.5693E-01 500.00 0.6470 3025.00 0.5628E-01 525.00 0.6055 3050.00 0.5565E-01 550.00 0.5684 3074.99 0.5503E-01 575.00 0.5353 3100.00 0.5443E-01 600.00 0.5054 3125.00 0.5383E-01 625.00 0.4784 3150.00 0.5325E-01 650.00 0.4537 3174.99 0.5268E-01 675.00 0.4310 3199.99 0.5211E-01 700.00 0.4104 3225.00 0.5156E-01 725.00 0.3914 3250.00 0.5102E-01 750.00 0.3738 3275.00 0.5049E-01 775.00 0.3576 3300.00 0.4996E-01 800.00 0.3425 3325.00 0.4945E-01 825.00 0.3286 3350.00 0.4895E-01 850.00 0.3156 3375.00 0.4845E-01 875.00 0.3033 3400.00 0.4796E-01 900.00 0.2919 3425.00 0.4749E-01 925.00 0.2812 3450.00 0.4702E-01 950.01 0.2712 3475.00 0.4655E-01 975.00 0.2618 3500.00 0.4610E-01 1000.00 0.2529 3525.00 0.4565E-01 1025.00 0.2446 3550.00 0.4521E-01 1050.00 0.2367 3575.00 0.4478E-01 1075.00 0.2293 3600.00 0.4436E-01 1100.00 0.2223 3625.00 0.4394E-01 1125.00 0.2156 3650.00 0.4353E-01 1150.00 0.2093 3675.00 0.4312E-01 1175.00 0.2033 3700.00 0.4272E-01 1200.00 0.1975 3724.99 0.4233E-01 1225.00 0.1921 3750.00 0.4195E-01 1250.00 0.1869 3775.00 0.4157E-01 1275.00 0.1819 3800.00 0.4119E-01 1300.00 0.1771 3825.00 0.4082E-01 1325.00 0.1726 3850.00 0.4046E-01 1350.00 0.1682 3875.00 0.4011E-01 1375.00 0.1641 3900.00 0.3975E-01 1400.00 0.1601 3925.00 0.3941E-01 1425.00 0.1563 3950.00 0.3907E-01 1450.00 0.1526 3975.00 0.3873E-01 1475.00 0.1491 4000.00 0.3840E-01 1500.00 0.1458 4025.00 0.3807E-01 1525.00 0.1425 4050.00 0.3775E-01 1550.00 0.1394 4075.00 0.3744E-01 1575.00 0.1364 4100.00 0.3712E-01 1600.00 0.1335 4125.00 0.3682E-01 1625.00 0.1307 4150.00 0.3651E-01 1650.00 0.1280 4175.00 0.3622E-01 1675.00 0.1254 4200.00 0.3592E-01 1700.00 0.1229 4225.00 0.3563E-01 1725.00 0.1205 4250.00 0.3534E-01 1750.00 0.1182 4275.00 0.3506E-01 1775.00 0.1159 4300.00 0.3478E-01 1800.00 0.1138 4325.00 0.3451E-01 1825.00 0.1124 4350.00 0.3424E-01 1850.00 0.1104 4375.00 0.3397E-01 1875.00 0.1084 4400.00 0.3371E-01 1900.00 0.1064 4425.00 0.3345E-01 1925.00 0.1045 4449.99 0.3319E-01 1950.00 0.1027 4475.00 0.3294E-01 1975.00 0.1009 4500.00 0.3269E-01 2000.00 0.9918E-01 4525.00 0.3244E-01 2025.00 0.9751E-01 4550.00 0.3220E-01 2050.00 0.9589E-01 4575.00 0.3195E-01 2075.00 0.9431E-01 4600.00 0.3172E-01 2100.00 0.9277E-01 4625.00 0.3148E-01 2125.00 0.9128E-01 4650.00 0.3125E-01 2150.00 0.8983E-01 4675.00 0.3102E-01 2175.00 0.8842E-01 4700.00 0.3080E-01 2200.00 0.8704E-01 4725.00 0.3058E-01 2225.00 0.8571E-01 4750.00 0.3036E-01 2250.00 0.8441E-01 4775.00 0.3014E-01 2275.00 0.8314E-01 4800.00 0.2992E-01 2300.00 0.8190E-01 4825.00 0.2971E-01 2325.00 0.8070E-01 4850.00 0.2950E-01 2350.00 0.7953E-01 4875.00 0.2930E-01 2375.00 0.7838E-01 4900.00 0.2909E-01 2400.00 0.7727E-01 4925.00 0.2889E-01 2425.00 0.7618E-01 4950.00 0.2869E-01 2450.00 0.7511E-01 4975.00 0.2849E-01 2475.00 0.7408E-01 5000.00 0.2830E-01 2500.00 0.7307E-01 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ********************** AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-hour, 8-hour, and 24-hour scaled concentrations are equal to the 1-hour concentration as referenced in SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4) Report number EPA-454/R-92-019 http://www.epa.gov/scramOOl/guidance_permit.htm under Screening Guidance MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1-HOUR 3-HOUR 8-HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- FLAT TERRAIN 6.142 6.142 6.142 6.142 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 100.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 4.678 4.678 4.678 4.678 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Xebec Warehouse Project San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 51.97 1000sgft 1.19 51,972.50 i 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 51.97 1000sgft 1.19 51,972.50 i 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.50 1000sgft 0.01 500.00 0 Parking Lot 89.00 Space 0.80 35,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2022 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Vehicle Trips - Consistent with 237 daily trips (see Planning Commission Staff Report, February 2020) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblLand Use LandUseSquareFeet 51,970.00 i 51,972.50 ___________________________ _____________________________ ------------------------------ tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 61,970.00 51,972.50 - ---...."-'---------'---'.__------------------____--------4------------------------------ tblVehicieTri s ST_TR 1.68 j 2.28 - -------------'-------'------ 1------------------------------f---------._ ----------- tbNehicleTrips ST_TR 1.68 2.28 - ---------------------'------ t------------------------------t-------------_-_._........ tblVehideTrips SU_TR 1.68 2.28 ..........................4.......___.__...___..___..'--T---------------------------- -------------------------- tblVehicleTri s SU_TR 1.68 j 2.28 - --"----'_____________"--• ____----— --"----------------------------+---------.'___-'---............... tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.68 2.28 tblVehicleTnps WD_TR 1.68 2.28 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year tonstyr MT/yr 2020 0.3063 2.7644 2.3399 4.6100e- 0.1546 0.1422 0.2967 0.0607 0.1333 0.1940 ± 0.0000 406.1454 406.1454 0.0789 0.0000 408.1181 003 3 i 2021 •• 0.5312 0.3806 0.3953 7.5000e- • 0.0139 • 0.0191 - 0.0330 3.7200e- • 0.0179 • 0A217 ± 0-0000 66.0560 66.0560 . 0.0131 0.0000 66.3844 004 003 t t Maximum 0.5312 2.76" 2.3399 4.6100e. 0.1546 0.1422 0.2967 0.0607 ' 0.1333 0.1940 0.0000 406.1454 406.1454 0.0789 0.0000 408.1181 003 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust P102.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year tons/yr MT/yr 2020 0.3063 2.7644 2.3399 4.6100e. 0.1546 0.1422 0.2967 0.0607 0.1333 • 0.1940 1 0.0000 406.1450 406.1450 0.0789 0.0000 406.1178 003 .. , • • , 2021 0.5312 0.3806 0.3953 7.5000e- 0.0139 0,0191 0.0330 3.7200e- 0.0179 0.0217 0.0000 66,0559 66.0559 r 0.0131 0.0000 66.3844 004 003 + i r7" 0.5312 2.7644 2.3399 4.6100e- 0.1546 0.1422 0.2967 ' 0.0607 0.1333 0.1940 0.0000 406.1450 406.1450 1 0.0789 0.0000 408.1178 ooa I ROCJ NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction l CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County,Annual Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG+NOX(tons/quarter) 1 2-6-2020 5-5-2020 0.9809 0,9809 2 5-6-2020 8-5-2020 0,7995 0.7995 3 8-6-2020 11-5-2020 0.7994 0.7994 4 11-6-2020 2-5-2021 0,7705 0.7705 5 2-6-2021 5-5-2021 0.6478 0,6478 Highest 0.9809 0.9809 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NNi CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tonslyr MT/yr Area 0 4269 2.00OOe- 2.4700e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- + 0,0000 4 e000e- 4.8000e- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 5.1200e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003 L ______ ______ _______ _ Energy 0.0151 • 0.1370 0.1151 8.2000e- 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 r 0.0104 L 0.0000 • 853.7886�B53.7886 r 0.0320 8.7500e 857.1958 004 i 003 ____ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ __ __ ______ i_ ____ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______ ___ •• r r r r r r r r • r r r r r r r � r r r r . r • T T�� T Y T T T T Y __ T _• r� T T T T Mobile •• 0.0857 0.6701 1.1740 4.9100e- 0.3868 3.4700e- 0.3902 0.1037 3.2500e- ' 0.1069 + 0.0000 • 454.2907 • 454.2907 r 0.0218 0.0000 ' 454.8351 003 003 003 { ____ ______ _______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______ ______ ______ _______ ______ L___ __ ______ ______ ____ -------------- Waste r r r i i r r • � i r .. r r � r r , i � r , i i r • w T T i -T r -1 •- T Y Y � r { • r T vY 0.0000 � 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 { 19.8322 0.0000 19.8322 1.1721 0.0000 49.1335 1 1 .r r r i r r r r r . • r r r r � r . r r r T______T__ r_______y______.-______T______T______T______t_._____ Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.6256 99.7203 107.3459 ' 0.7873 0.0194 132.7941 { i Total 0.5276 0.8072 1.2916 5.7300e- 0.3868 0.0139 0.4007 0.1037 0.0137 0.1173 27.4578 1,407.804' 1,435.262 2.0131 0.0281 1,493.963 003 5 2 7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bo-0O2 NBio-CO2 Totai CO2 CH4 N20 LL PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tonslyr MT/yr Area 0.4269 2.0000e- 2.4700e- 0.0000 1.0000e- i.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- ! 0.0000 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 5.1200e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 j 003 003 005 003 ! _____ r______ _______ _______r______ _______ -------�_______1_______r_______ __0000 .,_______-_______ _-_______�857195 . Energy � 0.0151 � 0.1370 � 0.1151 � 8.2000e- � � 0.0704 � 0.0704 � � 0.0104 0.0104 � 0.0000 853.7886 � 853.7886 r 0.0320 � 8.7500e- 857.1958 . i 004 ! 003 Mobile 0.0857 0.6701 1.1740 4.9100e- 0.3868 3.4700e- 0.3902 0.1037 3.2500e- 0.1069 0.0000 454.2907 454,2907 0.0218 0.0000 454.8351 003 003 003 ! i _._____.__. _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______r_____ y _ Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 ± 19.8322 0.0000 19.8322 1.1721 0.0000 49.1335 i __________. ,_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______r______ _______-_______,,._______-i______ ___4_______4_______4_______.'__ _ Water � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 7.6256 '___99.7203 107.3459 0.7873 0.0194 132.7941 i i Total 0.5276 0.8072 1.2916 5.7300e- ' 0.3868 0.0139 0.4007 0.1037 0.0137 0.1173 27.4578 1,407.804 1,435.262 2.0131 1 0.0287 1 1,493.963 003 5 2 7 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 •Demolition -Demolition -2/b/2020 :3/4/2020 5 20: 2 Site Preparation :Site Preparation -3/5/2020 :3111/2020 5 5� 3 :Grading :Grading -3/1212020 :3/23/2020 5 8� 4 :Building Construction :Building Construction -3/24/2020 :2/8/2021 5: 230: 5 :Paving :Paving -2/9/2021 :3/4/2021 5: 18: 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating -3/512021 •3/30/2021 5. 18- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0.81 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 155,918; Non-Residential Outdoor: 51,973; Striped Parking Area: 2,166 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition •Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 i 8.00. 81, 0.73 Demolition-----------------------------Excavators --- _F 3i----------B.00F--------- -158�___________0.38 ______________________________------___-_____-_--______F------------------i--------------F—_---_ .............. Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 21 8.00: 247: 0.40 -.........................----------------------------F----------------i-------------� _--_—__ 4------- Site Preparation -Rubber Tired Dozers 31 8.00: 247' 0.46 ..................'--------- F----------------i'------------F----9-- --•-•_____ 0.37 Site Preparation :Tractors/LoadersBackhces 41 -- ---- 8.00: !! F'-------- --------------F----------------'7- Grading :Excavators 11 8.001 158: 0.38 ---------------------------r---------------------------F----------------i-------------F -----�---••--------- Grading -Graders 11 8.00: 187: 0.41 6Q 7 ---------------------------F----------------i-------------F----------- -----------Grading -Rubber Tired Dozers 11 8.00: 247: 0.40 -------•--------------•--';---------------------------F----------------i-------------i- ---- -------------- Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 31 8.00 97: 0.37 --------------------------------------------------------F----------------i-------------F---------- -----------___ Building Construction -Cranes 11 7.00: 231: 0.29 ---------------•----------------------------------------F----------------i-------------F 89 0.20i Building Construction -Forklifts r 31 8.00: t Building Construction •Generator Sets r L B.00r 84: 0.74 -----•____________________•-----------------------------r ------------r 4-------------- Building Construction Tractors/LoadersBackhoes 3It 7.00: - 97: 0.37 ----------------------F---------------14-------------F-------- BuildingConstruction -Welders 1!t! -••----- 8.00� 46: 0.46 ----------------------------r---------------------------F----------------'i- F-------�. Paving -Cement and Mortar Mixers 2i 6.00� 9: 0.56 ........................................................F----------------i-------------F---------F-••-••-•••- Paving -Pavers 11 8.00: 130: 0.42 • -------------F----------------i-------------F----------'-------------- Pavi -_----••- -----_---• _-ng - Paving Equipment r 21 6.00: 132: 0.36 -•-------------------------•_---------------------------F----------------i-------------F-------------••------- Paving -Rollers 21 6.00: 80: 0.38 _______________________________------------------_------F----------------i-------------F —9...........0.37 Paving 'Tractors/LoaderslBackhces- _____________1 t 8.00� ------4--- 4-------------4--------------F__•--•-____--- Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00- 78 0.48 Trios and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6i 15.00• 0.001 0.00• 14.701 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHOT _ ---------- - -_- ---------- Site Preparation 7r 18.00• 0.001 0.00• 14.701 6.90' 20.00:LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix 'HHDT r t r . r _ --------- --------- .. Grading 61 15.00• 0.001 0.00• 14.70� 6.90� 20.00-LD_Mix �HDT_Mix HHDT ----------- --------------F---------;...-------4--------- %----------I----------4----------I--------------I------------ ---------- BuildingConstruction 9t 59.00• 23.001 0.00: 14.70t 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix -HDT_Mix (HHDT Paving 81 20.00• O.00i 0.00• 14.70i 6.90� 20.00�LD_Mix :HDT_Mix HHDT ' Architectural Coating 1• 12.00• 0.00• 0.00• 14.70• 6.90• 20.00•LD-Mix •HDT_Mix -HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bid-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 1 720 1 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonstyr MTtyr Off-Road 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 0.0166 0.0166 0.0154 0.0154 j 0.0000 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- - 0.0000 - 34.2386 004 OC3 Total 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 0.0166 0.0166 0.0154 0.0154 INN 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 34.2386 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County,Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-Cot Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MTlyr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r r T r • r T • .- r r --------------- Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ........... r______ ------r------r______.f______r------.r------r------ , 1 Worker •• 7.4000e- 5.8000e- . 5.8200e- 2.000Oe- 1.6400e- 1.000Oe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.0000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 7.4097 7.4097 4.00007 0.0000 1.4108 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i 005 t Total •• 7.4000e- , 5.8000e- ' 5.8200e- , 2.0000e- ' 1.6400e. ' 1.0000e- ' 1.6600e. ' 4.4000e. ' 1.0000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 1.4097 1.4097 4.000Oe- 0.0000 1.4108 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO $02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tonslyr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- . 0.0166 0.0166 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 34,2385 004 i 003 1 Total 0.0331 ' MUM ' 0.2175 , 3.9000e- ' ' 0.0166 , 0.0166 ' , 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 33.9986 ' 33.9986 ' 9.6000e. 1 0.0000 ' 34.2385 0" 003 CalEEMOd Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM I Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County,Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 FugOive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO20 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 ealeoc-� tonstyr MT/yr auu; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i __• _•_ _•r______ ------ ______ ______ ______"______ ____ ______ Worker •• 7.4000e- 5.8000e- 5.8200e- 2.000Oe- 1.6400e- 1.000Oe- • 1.6600e- • 4.4000e- 1.000Oe- 4.5000e- i 0.0000 1.4097 r 1.4097 • 4.000Oe- • 0.0000 1.4108 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i 005 i Total 7.4000e- 5.8000e- I 5.8200e. 2.0000e- ' 1.6400e- 1.0000e- 1.6600e- • 4.4000e- 1.0000e- 4.5000e. 0.0000 1.4097 1.4097 • 4.0000e- 0.0000 1.4108 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugdlve Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MTlyr Fugitive Dust 0.0452 0.0000 0.0452 0.0248 0.0000 0.0248 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 .• r • • , , • • • • 1 • r dB-Road •• 0.0102 r 0.1060 0.0538 1.000ge- 5.4900e- r 5.4908e- r • 5.0500e- • 5.0500e- + 0.0000 8.35T7 8.3577 • 2.7000e- r 0.0000 • 8.4253 004 003 003 003 003 i 003 Total 0.0102 r 0.1060 • 0.0538 • 1.0000e- ' 0.0452 ' 5.4900e- • 0.0507 • 0.0248 • 5.0500e- • 0.0299 0.0000 8.3577 • 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 •Ln 004 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County,Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 Naio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 1 720 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t. r r i r , r r r Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 1 Worker 2.2000e- r 1.7000e- 1.7500e- r 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.0000e- 1.3000e- r 0.0000 r 1.3000e- t 0.0000 0.4229 04229 1.00OOe- 0.0000 ? 0.4232 004 004 003 00-: 004 004 004 i 005 Total •' 2.2000e- , 1.7000e- 1 1.7500e- ' 0.0000 r 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.0000e. 1.3000e. ' 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4229 0.4229 1.00OOe- !0.0�0000.4232 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fug0ive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0452 0.0000 0.0452 r 0.0248 r 0.0000 r 0.0248 1 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 _ _ Off-Road 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.00OOe- � 5.4900e- 5.4900e- � r 5.OSOOe- r 5.0500e- 1 0.0000 r 8.3577 r 8.3577 T2.7000e-T 0.0000 � 8.4252 004 003 003 D03 D03 i D03 i Total a 0.0102 0.1060 ' 0.0538 1.00OOe- 0.0452 5.4900e- , 0.0507 0.0248 5.0500e- ' 0.0299 0.0000 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- , 0.0000 r 8.4252 004 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation -2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM1O Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tonslyr MTlyr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 1 ........... ______ ______ ______ ______ ______i ______ ______ ______ ______ ____ 1_ _____ ______ ______ ______ _y Worker •M2.2000e-Y1.7000e-T1.7500e-r 0.0000 T4.9000e-r 0.0000 YS.000Oe-T1.3000e-r 0.0000 � 1.3000e- � 0.0000 -' 0.4229 r 0.4229 Y1.00DOe-T 0.0000 - 0.4232 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 r 005 1 Total 2.2000e- 1.7000e- , 1.7500e- 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 1.3000e. 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4229 ' 0.4229 1 1.0000e- 0.0000 0.4232 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5TOtal Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N211 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0262 0.0000 0.0262 0.0135 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 _____ _ ______ _______ _______ _______w______r______r______r______r______T_______r_____ _ ______ ______ ____ _ ____ _ _ _ _ •ir Y Off-Road •� 9.7200e- � 0.1055 � 0.0642 � 1.2000e- � � 5.0900e- � 5.0900e- � � 4.6900e- � 4.6900e- r 0.0000 r 10.4235 w 10.4235 T3.3700e-T 0.0000 ? 10.5078 003 004 003 003 003 003 i 003 1 Total 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- ' 0.0262 5.0900e- ' 0.0313 ' 0.0135 4.6900e- 0.0182 0.0000 10.4235 • 10.4235 r 3.3700e- ' 0.0000 10.5078 003 004 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County,Annual 3.4 Grading -2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 1 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-CC2 NBio-CC2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 f __ Vendor 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 �-0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 1 __ __ ______ _______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______1__ ___ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ___ •, � r r r r i r r i r • •M T T T T T T T T Y -•� T T T -. Worker 3.000Oe- 2.3000e- 2.3300e• 1.0000e- 6.6000e- r 0.0000 6.6000e- 1.7000e- - 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.5639 0.5639 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.5643 004 004 D03 005 004 004 004 004 1 005 1 Total 3.000Oe- 2.3000e- r 2.3300e- r 1.000Oe- 6.6000e- 0.0000 6.6000e- 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.5639 0-5639 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.5643 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0262 0.0000 0.0262 0.0135 0.0000 0.0135 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _____ __ . ______, ______r ______r ______r ____ r ______r ______r ___ _r ______r _______1_______ ______ ______ ______ ..1� T w T T ��T T T �� T T Y .� T T T ______ _____ OH-Road 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- • 5.0900e- r 5.0900e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- i 0.0000 r 10.4235 10.4235 • 3.3700e- • 0.0000 10.5078 003 004 003 003 003 003 1 003 1 Total 9.7200e- , 0.1055 r 0.0642 ' 1.2000e- , 0.0262 5.0900e. r 0.0313 r 0.0135 r 4.6900e• r 0.0182 0.0000 IOA235 r 10.4235 r 3.3700e- r 0.0000 10.5078 003 004 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading -2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tonsfyr MTJyr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0-0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -___ _ r______-_______.r______r______r______ r r r r T Y r r r r T Vendor •. 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 • 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 �I 1 Worker 3.0000a- 2.3000e- 2.3300e- 1.0000e- 6.6000e- 0.0000 6.6000e- 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 1 0.0000 0.5639 0.5639 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.5643 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 y 005 i Total • 3.0000e- ' 2.3000e- 2.3300e- 1.0000e- 6.6000e- 0.0000 6.6000e- 1.7000e- ' 0,0000 ' 1.8000e. 0.0000 0.5639 0.5639 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.5643 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugi ive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tonsfyr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2152 1.9474 1.7101 2.7300e- 0.1134 0.1134 0.1066 0.1066 i 0.0000 235.0841 235,0841 0.0574 0.0000 236.5179 003 i 1 Total 0.2152 ' 1.9474 • 1.7101 ' 2.7300e- 0.1134 0.1134 • 0.1066 ' 0.106E 1 0.0000 235.0841 ' 235.0841 ' 0.0574 ' 0.0000 236.5179 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction -2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOz CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio- 2 Total CO2 CH4 720 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MTlyr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Vendor •• 7.2400e 0.2492 0.0521 • 6.2000e- 0.0147 1.1400e- 0.0159 • 4.2500e- 1.0900e- 5.3400e- 0.0000 59.6038 59.6038 • 4.1200e- 0.0000 59.7069 003 003 004 003 003 003 003 t.. i i i • r ., r i i r r ______ ______ _______ __ ______ •r T T T T T r� T Y T 1 .. _ _T T� T t Worker •• 0.0296 � 0.0233 0.2323 6.2000e- � 0.0657 � 4.4000e- 0.0661 • 0.0174 � 4.000Oe- � 0.0778 � 0.0000 � 56.2811 � 56.28n 1.6900e- 0 234 004 004 004 i 003 Total 0.0368 0.2725 0.2844 1.2400e. 0,0804 1.5800e. 0.0820 ' 0.0217 ' 1.4900e. 0.0232 0.0000 115,8849 115.8849 5.8100e- ' 0.0000 116.0303 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust 7111 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 MID Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tonsryr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2152 • 1.9474 1.7101 2.7300e- • 0.1134 • 0.1134 0.1066 • 0.1066 ± 0.0000 235.0839 • 235.0839 • 0.0574 0.0000 236.5177 003 i Total •• 0.2152 r 1.9474 r 1.7101 2.7300e- ' 0.1134 r 0.1134 r , 0.1066 ' 0.1086 0.0000 235.0839 ' 235.0839 , 0.0574 0.0000 1 236.5177 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction -2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5TOtal Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tonstyr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _.... Vendor 7.2400e- r 0.2492 0.0521 6.2000e- r 0.0147 1.1400e- 0.0159 4.2500e- 1.0900e- r 5.3400e- ± 0.0000 59.6038 r 59.6038 r 4.1200e- 0.0000 59.7069 003 004 003 003 003 003 + 003 r r r r r r r . Worker 0.0296 r 0.0233 r 0.2323 r 6.2000e- r 0.0657 r 4.4000e- 0.0661 0.0174 r 4.0000e- 0.0178 1 0.0000 56.2811 T 56.2811 T1.6900e w 0.0000 56 3234 004 004 004 i 003 •Total 0.0368 ' 0.2725 ' 0.2844 1.2400e. 0.0804 ' 1.5800e. 0.0820 0.0217 1.4900e. 0.0232 0.0000 115,8849 115.8849 5.8100e- 0.0000 116.0303 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction -2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr OH-Road 0.0257 0.2353 0.2238 3.6000e- 0.0129 -r 0.0129 x 0.0122 0.0122 0.0000 31.2710 31.2710 r 7.5400e- 0.0000 31.4596 004 ! 003 i Total •' 0.0257 r 0.2353 r 0.2238 r 3.6000e. ' r 0.0129 r 0.0129 r r 0.0122 r 0.0122 0.0000 1 31.2710 r 31.2710 r 7.5400e- r 0.0000 , 31.4596 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4,52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM70 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ions/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 i _..___••r------r______r______r______r______ -------Y------r------r______r_______`_______r______ ______ ______ ______ _.___ Vendor 8 600e-.2000e- 0.0302 6.1500e- 8.000Oe- 1.9 5.000Oe- 2.0100e- 5.6000e- 5.000Oe- 6.1000e- 0.0000 7.8856 r 7.8856 T5.3000e-w 0.0000 ? 7.8988 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 ., , , , , , , _y Worker •� 3.6700e-T2.7700e r 0.0284 TB.000Oe T8.7300e-T6.000Oe Y8.7900e-T2.3200e T5.000Oe-r 2.3700e- � 0.0000 � 7.2474 T 7.2474 T2.000Oe r 0.0000 7.2524 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 t 004 Total •, 4.4900e- ' 0.0330 0.0345 1.6000e- 0.0107 ' 1.1000e- ' 0.0108 1 2.8800e- ' 1.0000e. ' 2.9800e- 0.0000 15,1329 15.1329 7.3000e- 0,0000 15.1513 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total 7777771 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0257 0.2353 0.2238 3.6000e- 0,0129 0,0129 0,0122 0,0122 i 0.0000 31.2710 31.2710 7.5400e- 0.0000 31.4596 004 + 003 Total 0.0257 1 0.2353 0.2238 3.6000e- 0.0129 0.0129 0.0122 0.0122 0.0000 31.2710 1 31.2710 ' 7.5400e- 1 0.0000 ' 31.4596 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 217/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction -2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG I NOz I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 _ _ _______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______1___ __ ______ ______ ______ ______ ...... .n r r r -r r r r �- T Y - -,� r Y r t....... Vendor 8.2000e- r 0.0302 r 6.1500e- 8.000Oe- 1.9600e- 5.000Oe- 2.0100e- 5.6000e- 5.0000e- 6.1000e- + 0.0000 7.885E 7.885E r 5.3000e- r 0.0000 7.8988 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i 004 Worker 3.6700e- r 2.7700e- r 0.0284 8.0000e- 8.7300e- 5.0000e- 8.7900e- r 2.3200e- - 5.0000e- r 2.3700e- + 0.0000 7.2474 r 7.2474 r 2.0000e- r 0.0000 7.2524 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 i 004 + Total 4.4900e. , 0.0330 0.0345 1.6000e- 0.0107 1.1000e- , 0.0108 r 2.8800e- 1.0000e- , 2.9800e. 0.0000 15.1329 15.1329 r 7.3000e- r 0.0000 15.1513 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tonslyr MT/yr Off-Road 9.8500e- 0.0976 r 0.1103 1.7000e- 5.2100e- r 5.2100e- 4.8100e- 4.8100e- 0.0000 14.7336 r 14.7336 r 4.6300e- 0.0000 14.8493 003 004 003 003 003 003 1 003 1 r r r r , r r r , r r x r r i i r , r Paving 1.05OOe- 0.0000 x 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 � 0.0000 : 0.0000 x 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 003 1 1 Total 0.0109 1 0.0978 1 0.1103 1.7000e- 5.2100e. r 5.2100e. r r 4.8100e- r 4.8100e. 0.0000 14.7336 14.7336 r 4.6300e- ' 0.0000 14.8493 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4,52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.STotal Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor Moot) • 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 � 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 r 0.0000 11 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 r 0.0000 • 0.0000 ? 0.0000 1 Worker 8.3000e- 6.3000e- 6.4100e- • 2.000Oe- • 1.9700e- • 1.0000e- • 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.0000e- 5.4000e- 0.0000 1.6378 1.6378 5.0000e- • 0.0000 1.6390 ON 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 1 005 1 Total 8.3000e- • 6.3000e- • 6.4100e. • 2.0000e. • 1.9700e. • 1.000Oe- 1.9900e- • 5.2000e- 1.000Oe- • 5.4000e. 0.0000 1.6378 1.6378 5.0000e- 0.0000 1,6390 004 006 003 005 003 005 003 006 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 G02e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 9,8500e- 0.0976 0,1103 1.7000e- 5.2100e- • 5.2100e- 4.8100e- • 4.8100e- j 0.0000 14.7335 • 14.7335 4.6300e- 0.0000 14.8493 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 .. r , r , Paving 1.0500e- r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 003 Total 0.0109 0.0976 0.1103 1.7000e- • 5.2100e- 5.21OOe- ' 4.8100e- 4.8100e- 0.0000 14.7335 14.7335 • 4.63001. • 0.0000 • 14.8493 004 003 003 003 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Blo-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 MOM ............, , , , , , , , , , i , Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 O.W00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I i 1 ...........•r------w------r------ _______.r______r______r______r______ _______r_______y_00000 r______r______r______r______t__6390 Worker •� 8.3000e- � 6.3000e- � 6.4100e- � 2.000Oe- � 1.9700e- � 1.000Oe- � 1.9900e- � 5.2000e- � 1.0000e- � 5.4000e- � 0.0000 1.6378 1.6378 � 5.0000e- � 0.0000 1.6390 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 1 Total 8.3000e. ' 6.3000e- ' 6.4100e- 2.000Oe- 1.9700e- , 1.000Oe- ' 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.000Oe- 5.4000e. 0.0000 1.6378 ' 1.6378 ' 5.0000e- ' 0.0000 ' 1.6390 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust JPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MTtyr Archil,Coating 0.4868 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 , Off-Road 1.9700e- 0.0137 0.0164 3.000Oe- 8.5000e- - 8.5000, B.5000e- 8.5000e- 0.0000 2.2979 - 2.2979 1.6000e- - 0.0000 2.3019 003 005 004 004 004 004 y 004 i i + Total 0.4888 0.0137 0.0164 1 3.0000e- ' 1 8.5000e- 1 8.5000e- 1 1 8.5000e- ' 8.5000e. 0.0000 2.2979 1 2.2979 ' 1.6000e- ' 0.0000 2.3019 005 004 004 004 004 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5TOtal Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 TotalCO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MTlyr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 - 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 • 0.0000 A 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 ' 0.0000 0.0000 ____ ___ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ 1 __ ___ ._ . . • r • • . r . . • r r r . r r � • r • • -. •i•- Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y T -1 ---------------------- Worker •� 5.000Oe- ' 3.8000e- • 3.8500e- � 1.000Oe- • 1.1800e- • 1.0000e- • 1.1900e- � 3.1000e- � 1.000Oe- 3.2000e- 1 0.0000 � 0.9827 0.9827 3.000Oe-.-- 0.0000 0.9834 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 1 Total 5.0000e. 3.8000e• • 3.8500e. 1.0000e• 1.1800e- 1.000Oe- 1.1900e- 3.1000e- 1.0000e- 3.2000e. 0.0000 0.9827 0.9827 3.000Oe- 0.0000 0.9834 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust IPM2.5TOtal Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tol MT/yr Archit.Coating 0.4868 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 f _ _ _______Y______T______Y______Y______Y______ ______ ______ ______T_______t_______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _ n Y T Y Y r OH-Road •� 1.9700e- � 0.0137 • 0.0164 • 3.00OOe- � � 8.5000e- � 8.5000e- ' • 8.5000e- � 8.5000e- ± 0.0000 � 2.2979 r 2.2979 T1.6000e r 0.0000 � 2.3019 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 1 Total 0.4888 • 0.0137 • 0.0164 • 3.000Oe- 8.5000e. 8.5000e- • • 8.5000e- 8.5000e- 0.0000 1 2.2979 • 2.2979 • 1.6000e- 0.0000 2.3019 005 004 004 004 00, 004 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tonstyr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 L i r r T T T T T T Y .. T T • Vendor •• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 ± g.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 r 0.0000 T o.0000 o.00tio Worker 5.0000e- 3.8000e- 3.8500e- 1.00OOe- 1.1800e. 1.00OOe- • 1.1900e- • 3.1000e- 1.00OOe- • 3.2000e- i 0.0000 0.9827 0.9827 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.9834 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 1 005 t Total 5.00OOe- 3.8000e- 3.8500e- 1.00OOe- 1.1800e- 1.00OOe- 1.1900e- 3.1000e. 1.00OOe- 3.2000e- 0.0000 0.9827 0.9827 3.0000e- 0.0000 0.9834 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMOd Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County,Annual R0 NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust JPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0857 0.6701 1A740 4.9100e- 0.3868 3.4700e- 0,3902 0.1037 3.2500e- 0.1069 ` 0.0000 454.2907 454.2907 0.0218 0.0000 454.8351 003 003 003 f_____„______T______T______..,.______ _..______T______T______T______T_______�__ ______T______ Unmted 0.0857 O.fi701 1.1740 � 4.9100e- 0.3888 � 3.4700e- 0.3902 0.1037 � 3.2500e- 0.1069 0.00000000 � 454.2907 • 454.2907T_0.0218 T_0.0000 ?itiga 454.8351 003 003 003 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 .......Other _ Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 ..........9..........................i_____________-F•-----------i._____-----:--_____-_______...______i......_..__--------------- Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 118.49 118.49 1 118.49 _ 507,821 507.821 ......i"""--""-"'F--_________- _ ._4_ •....Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail • 118.49 118.49 1 118.49 507,821 507,821 Total 236.98 236.98 236.98 1,015,643 1,015,643 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W HS or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 0 0 0 ............9.......... ---------- ---------___________:________Y_________r-----------:-...__.____,__________,___-.---- Parkin Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Refit erated Warehouse-No 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 1 41.00 92 5 3 ..........:::.........:-______----.__._____-___"------ ----------------- ------- - - - Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHDt I LHD2 I MHD I HHD OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS MH Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.553113• 0.0364081 0.1802861 0.1163351 0.0161651 0.005101i 0.018218i 0.063797i 0.001357i 0.001565i 0.005903i 0.000808i 0.000944 I 1 I I 1 I I I I 1 -_-___--____9__. _____�___-__-;_______t_______-_____ f_______t_______t_______+_______1 _______1 _______t_______t_______T_____.. Parkin Lot 0.553113• 0.0364081 0.1802861 0.1163351 0.0161651 0.0051011 0.0182181 0.06379711 0.0013571 0.0015651 0.0059031 0.0008081 0.000944 • • I 1 i I 1 1 I 1 1 1 Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail: 0.553113- 0.0364081 0.1802861 0.1163351 0.0161651 0.0051011 0.0182181 0.0637971 0.0013571 0.0015651 0.0059031 0.0008081 0.000944 ........................4.. - - ------ -------- -------- --------+----"+------ -------- -------- --------4-------- --------4........ Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 0.553113. 0.036408- 0.180286• 0.116335. 0.016165• 0.005101• 0.018218• 0.063797: 0.001357: 0.001565• 0.005903: 0.000808• 0.000944 Rail 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 704.6047 704,6047 0.0291 6.0200e- 707.1254 Mitigated j 003 .� . , , . • , i • • • • i . • • • _ Electricity 0.0000 • 0.0000 • • 0.0000 • 0.0000 i 0.0000 • 704.6047 • 704.6047 • 0.0291 • 6.0200a- • 707.1254 unmitigated i 003 ______ ______ _____ ______ ______ ______ ____ ______ ____ _______i__ __ _ ______ ______ ______ ___ _ ______ T T T T T T�� T Te T ♦ r T •r- T T NaturalGas 0.0151 0.1370 0.1151 • 8.2000e- 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0000 149.1839 r 149.1839 • 2.8600e- 2.7400e- 150.0704 Mitigated 004 i 003 003 ., • • , , • r NaturalGas 0.0151 0.1370 0.1151 8.2000e- 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0000 149.1839 • 149.1839 • 2.8600e- 2.7400e- 150.0704 unmitigated 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG I NOx CO 502 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 TotalF 02 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e sus PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kSTU/yr tons/yr MTtyr Other Non- 0 1; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ___________ ______b ______ ______ _ _ _____ ______ ___ _ ____ ______ ______ _______i_______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______ r' T� T T 0�T� T T T ��T T T Y ,� T T T Parking Lot 0 A. 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • • 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 I, f _ ______ -.____T--- ___T------ T------ T------ T------ T------ T______T-----.- ..............T______T______T______T_...... Refrigerated 2.6901e 0.0145 t 0.1319 t 0.1108 r 7.9000e- r t 0.0100 r 0.0100 t t 0.0100 1 0.0100 0,0000 143.5538 t 143.5538 i 2.7500e- t 2.6300e- t 144,4069 Warehouse-No ; .006 I I 004 I I I I I I I i 003 I 003 Rail •; i t t t i t t t t t t t t Unrefngerated 105504 •- 5.7000e- i 5.1700e- i 4.3400e- i 3.000Oe- i t 3.9000e- i 3.9000e- t t 3.9000e- t 3.9000e- 0.0000 5.6301 i 5.6301 i 1.1000e- t 1.000Oe- t 5.663E Warehouse-No ; 004 i 003 I 003 I 005 I i 004 I 004 I I 004 I 004 I I 004 I 004 Rail i Total 0.0151 0.1370 0.1151 8.2000e- 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0,0000 149.1839 149.1839 2.8600e. 2.7300e- 150.0704 004 003 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG I NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e s Usa PM10 PM10 Total PM2-5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tonstyr MT/yr Other Non- 0 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0A000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; r, ........... ______1, ______ _ ___ __ ______ ____ ______ ______ ______ _____ _______i_______ ______ ______ __ __ ___ _ _ f M T T ��T T� T T T T� T 1 ,� T T T T Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6 ; i ''_ -__-• -__-__T____-_T____-_T___-__T______T______T_-----T------T----__7....."-�--•00_'--'-"-T______T______T_--'--�_'•__ Refrigerated 2.6901e • 0.0145 1 0.1319 1 0.1108 1 7.9000e- I I 0.0100 I 0.0100 I I 0.0100 I 0.0100 0.0000 143.5538 1 143.5538 1 2.7500e• 1 2.6300e- 1 144.4069 Warehouse-No +006 1 1 1 004 1 1 I I I I I I 003 1 003 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 Rail 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I .-------I-----•- F------ - t------t- --- •---•-- -- ------ - ------- Unrerigerated 105504 5.7000e- 15.1700e- 1 4.3400e- 13.0000e- I 13.9000e- 13.9000e- I 13.9000e- I 3.9000e- 0.0000 5.6301 1 5.6301 i 1.1000e- 1 1.000Oe- 1 5.6636 Warehouse-No ; 004 1 003 I 003 1 005 004 i 004 004 004 004 004 Rail I I 1 I I I � 1 1 I I I I r77 l 0.0151 0.1370 0.1151 8.2000e• 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0104 0.0000 149.1839 149.1839 2.8600e- 2.7300e- 150.0704 004 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 1 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Other Non- 0 r, 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot 12460 3.9700 1.6000e 3.000Oe 3.9842 a, 004 005 _ __ __ t, Refrigerated 2.0763e 661.5541 i 0.0273 i 5.6500e- i 663.9208 Warehouse-No +006 i 1 003 Rail I r I --I._---_-�H______+_..__-._t______- ----.-- Unreffigerated 122655 39.0805 i 1.6100e. i 3.3000e- i 39.2204 Warehouse-No 003 i 004 Rail i Total 704.6047 1 0.0291 6.0100e- 707.1254 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Use Land Use kWhi MT/yr Other Non- 0 r' 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; r, _ __ _ _r. ______ _______ _______ _ _ Parking Lot 12460 k; 3.9700 1.6000e 3.0000e 3.9842 �, 004 005 ---------------T______T___---T- Refrigerated 2.0763e •' 661.5541 r 0.0273 r 5.6500e- i 663.92083.9208 Warehouse-No +006 I i 003 Rail •' r --I-------�}.______-t-______t______- ------- Unrefrigerated 122655 39.0805 1 7.6100e- i 3.3000e- r 39.2204 Warehouse-No ; 003 004 i Rail Total 704.6047 0.0291 6.0100e- 707.1254 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2O16.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.STotal Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 1 72O 1 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.4269 2.00OOe- 2.4700e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1 0.0000 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 1.0000e- - 0.0000 • 5.1200e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 + 003 003 005 003 1 __ _-_____„______. ______ .______T______T______ .______T______T______-______T_______Y.______-______T______T______T______- _...___ Unmitigated 0.4269 2.00OOe- 2.4700e- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 1.00OOe- • 1.00OOe- 0.0000 4.8OOOe- 4.8OOOe- 1.00OOe• 0.0000 5.1200e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG I NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory tonsyr MT/yr Architectural 0.0487 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 00000 Coating 1 Consumer 0.3779 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 Products ... M T 7• i r r -r r r T Y Landscaping •• 2.3000e- • 2.00OOe- 2.4700e- 0.0000 • • 1.00OOe• • 1.00OOe• • • 1.00OOe- • 1.00OOe- 1 0.0000 r4.8000e-r4.8000e r1.0000e - 0.0000 5 1200e- 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003 i Total 0.4269 2.0000e- 2.4700e- 0.0000 • • 1.00OOe- 1.0000e- 1.00OOe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.8000e- 4.8000e1 1.0000e- 0.0000 5.1200e. 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 001 005 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County,Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural 0.0487 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coaling r ______T____ _ ______ _ _ Consumer •� 0.3779 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 AA 0.0000 �-0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 ? 0.0000 Products 1 1 Landscaping •• 2.3000e- 2.000Oe- 2.4700e- 0.0000 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- A 0.0000 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 5.1200e- 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 i 003 003 005 003 i Total 0.4269 2.0000e. 2.4700e- 0.0000 , 1.0000e. 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.0000e. 0.0000 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 1.0000e- , 0.0000 5.1200e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 107.3459 0.7873 0.0194 1327941 --Unmitigated •T 107.3459T 0.7873 T 0.0194 ?132.7941 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Other Non- 0/0 L. 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces 3, Parking Lot 010 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 b ____ __•r______T ___ ____T...._. Refrigerated �12.0181/ •� 53.6730 t 0.3937 r 9.6700e- t 66.3971 Warehouse-No 0 i 003 Rail r r r __.�.______.r_�___.�...... Unretdgerated �12.0181/ •� 53.6730 t 0.3937 t 9.6700e- t 66.3971 Warehouse-No ; 0 003 Rail I I Total 107.3459 0.7873 1 0.0193 132.7941 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 I C114 I N20 1 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal I MT/yr Other Non- 0/0 i; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces r, Parking Lot 010 A; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r, __M______T______T______T._._... Refrigerated 12.0181 53.6730 r 0.3937 r 9.6700e- t 66.3971 Warehouse-No ; 0 i 003 Rail r r t _µ._ __.p.______.t.______I Unrefrigerated -12.0181/ •� 53.6730 r 0.3937 r 9.6700e- r 66.3971 Warehouse-No ; 0 003 Rail r Total 107.3459 0.7873 0.0193 132.7941 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual CategoryNear Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e MTlyr Mitigated •• 19.8322 1.1721 0.0000 49.1335 -_Unmitigated •T 19.8322 T 1.1721 T 0.0000 491335 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated JasteTotel02 CH4 N20 CO2DLand Use MT/yr Other Nan- 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parking Lot 0 0.0000 r 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 •_ r______T______T______T.____._ Refrigerated 48.85 • 9.9161 i 0.5860 i 0.0000 i 24.5667 Warehouse-No Rail _._____.-__t_______ __...._ Unrefrigerated 48.85 9.9161 r 0.5860 1 0.0000 1 24.5667 Warehouse-No ; r Rail Total 19.8322 1.1721 0.0000 49.1335 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Disposed11 Land Use tons MT/yr Other Non- 0 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces Parkin Lot 0 1• 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _ _ �• __M______T______T______T______. Refrigerated 48.85 •• 9.9167 r 0.5860 r 0.0000 i 24.5667 Warehouse-No Rail Unrefrigerated 48.85 •• 9.9161 1 0.5860 1 0.0000 1 24.5667 Warehouse-No Rail Total 19.8322 j 1.1721 j 0.0000 j 49.1335 11 9.0 Operational Off road Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 2/7/2020 4:52 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Annual Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Xebec Warehouse Project San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 51.97 1000sgft 1.19 51,972.50 I 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 51.97 1000sgft 1.19 51,972.50 I 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.50 1000sgft 0.01 500.00 i 0 Parking Lot 89.00 Space 0.80 35,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(mis) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2022 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments Sr Non-Default Data Project Characteristics- Vehicle Trips- Consistent with 237 daily trips (see Planning Commission Staff Report, February 2020) CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 51,970.00 51.972.50 _____________________________ -----------------------------}_____________________________f_._______________-____.___ tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 51.970.00 51,972.50 -----------------------------4----------------------------- ------------------ tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.68 2.28 ..................P____._..__„ --____------------------------a------------------------------+---------______--- ---- tblVehicleTri s ST_TR 1.68 2.28 -•---------------------------+.............................a'-----------------------------'t________------------------ tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.68 2.28 ------------------------------'__"------------------------+'------------------------------F---_.____..-_.__..-------- tblVehicleTri s SU_TR 1.68 2.28 __________'------------------ _---__--'_"1------------------------------t------------------------- tbNehicleTri s WD_TR 1.68 2.28 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.68 2.28 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bemardino-South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5TOtal Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year lb/day Iblday 2020 4.1747 . 42.4804 22.4278 0.0405 18.2675 2.1987 20.4662 9.9840 2.0228 12.0069 i 0.0000 • 3,917.217 3,917.217• 1,1981 0.0000 •3.943,795 5 5 6 • T T T 1 T T T T T • r T T 1 T 2021 54.3696 19.8355 19.4351 0.0396 0.8068 0.9666 1.7734 . 0.2173 0.9088 1.1261 i 0.0000 • 3,853.426.3,853.426. 0.6757 0.0000 •3,670.320 t 8 B 6 1 Maximum 54.3696 42.4804 22.4278 1 0.0405 , 18.2675 ' 2.1987 , 20.4662 • 9.9840 2.0228 12.0069 0.0000 , 3,917.217•3,917.217 ' 1.1981 0.0000 3.943.795 5 5 fi Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 TotalG02 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year lb/day Ib/day 2020 4.1747 42.4804 22.4278 0.0405 18.2675 2.1987 20.4662 9.9840 2.0228 12.0069 0.0000 3,917.217 3.917.217 1.1981 0,0000 •3,943.795 5 5 6 ___ ______ ______ __ __ _____ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______1_______ ______ ______ _____ ______ T T T �T T T T 1 r T T 2021 •• 54.3696 19.8355 19.4351 0.0396 0.8068 0.9666 1.7734 0.2173 0.9088 1.1261 0.0000 • 3,853.426.3,853.426T 0.6757 0.0000 �3,870.320 1 8 8 6 Maximum •, 54.3696 ' 42.4804 22.4278 ' 0.0405 , 18.2675 2.1987 ' 20.4662 ' 9.9840 1 2.0228 ' 12.0069 1 0,0000 3,917.217 3,917.217 1.1981 r 0.0000 , 3,943.795 11 5 5 6 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive ExhaustHPM2.5Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5Percent 0000000.00 0.00 0.00 0000.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Area •• 2.3395 1.8000e- ' 0.0198 0.0000 7.0000e- 7.000Oe- ' 7.000Oe- 7.0000e- 1 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- ' 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 1 004 Energy -• 0.0826 ' 0.7509 ' 0.6308 • 4.5100e- • 0.0571 ' 0.0571 0.0571 • 0.0571 • 901.0800 • 901.0800 ' 0.0173 ' 0.0165 • 906.4347 003 Mobile •• 0.5455 3.5753 7.2094 0.0287 2.1655 0.0191 2.1845 ' 0.5795 ' 0.0178 • 0.5973 2,921.767•2,921.767• 0.1332 •2,925.096 A 9 9 8 1 Total 2.9676 4.3264 7.8599 • 0.0332 • 2.1655 ' 0.0762 ' 2.2417 ' 0.5795 0.0750 0.6544 3,822.890 •3,822.890• 0.1505 , 0.0165 •3,831.576 2 2 6 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Sio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N211 LL PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Cateaory lb/day lb/day Area 2.3395 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- A 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- ' 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 1 i 004 1 •....... Energy •• 0.0826 • 0.7509 0.6308 ' 4.5100e- 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 T 0.0571 1 �901.0800 r901.0800 r 0.0173 � 0.0165 ?906.4347 003 1 Mobile 0.5455 3.5753 7.2094 0.0287 2.1655 0.0191 2.1845 0.5795 0.0178 0.5973 1 '2,921.767-2.921.767' 0.1332 - T 2,925.096 t 9 9 8 t Total 2.9676 4.3264 7.8599 0.0332 2.1655 0.0762 , 2.2417 ' 0.5795 0,0750 0.6544 •3,822.890 '3,822.890' 0.1505 0.0165 3.831.576 2 2 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Blo-CO2 NBlo-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM o Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0-00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number Week 1 -Demolition -Demolition -2/b/2020 :3/4/2020 5: 20: 2 -Site Preparation :Site Preparation -3/512020 :3/11/2020 5: 5: ___ ______________ ___________.________ 3 •Grading :Grading 3/12/2020 :3/23/2020 5: 8: -------------------------------------------------------I------------4------------4--------4--------4----------------------- 4 :Building Construction :Building Construction -3/24/2020 :2/8/2021 5: 230: 5 :Paving :Paving -2/9/2021 :3/4/2021 5: 18: 6 •Architectural Coating •Architectural Coating -3/512021 -3/30/2021 5, 18- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0.81 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 155,918; Non-Residential Outdoor: 51,973; Striped Parking Area: 2,166 (Architectural Coating —sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Phase Name Oftroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours IHorse Power Load Factor Demolition •Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 i 8.00' 81' 0.73 F--- ------------i-------------F---------------------- Demolition •Excavators ' 3i 8.00' 158' 0.38 f----------------i-------------F--------- ----------- -- Demolition -Rubber Tired Dozers 21 8.00: 247' 0.40 •--•----------------•------:---------------------------f----------------i �— --+•--------•---- Site Preparation -Rubber Tired Dozers 3r 8.00, 247: 0.40 ": ------------------ -----------------a--------- F------� Site Preparation •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 41 8.00: 97: 0.37 -•----•--•------------------:---------------------------F----------------i------------ F-- _ _----�... Grading ;Excavators ii ----_--- 8.00: 158: 0.38 _.._._•-------------•-------:---------------------------F----------------�' F— —Y Grading -Graders 1 i 8.00� 187: 0.41 ---------------i---------------------------r----------------i--------------F----t ...---•--•--•- Grading -Rubber Tired Dozers 1!1 - 8.00: 247: 0.40 _--_----_-•-----------------:---------------------------F----------------�- -----------�--.__-.___..•- Grading •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3i 8.00' 97: 0.37 -----•---------------------:---------------- - -- F----------------i ---- Building Construction -Cranes 11 7.00 F— 231: 0.29 ----------------------------r---------------------------F--------------- -�------ Building Construction :Forklifts 3j 8.00' 89: 0.20 - -------•--•--------------:---------------------------F----------------i-------------1------- -----------0.74 . Building Construction -Generator Sets 11 8.00: 84: ----------------------------1----_.__-------------------F----------------�- ~---------- Building Construction •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3j 7.00' 97: 0.37 -----------•-------------••_---------------------------I ----------------i I___' -------------•- BuildingConstruction -Welders 1� ---•---- 8.00: 46: 0.45 ...........................':---------------------------F---------------- - F----�...........____ Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2t -•-- 6.00� 9: 0.56 1---------------------------F----------------I- �-------------:. Paving -•--••••••--------------Pavers----- F 1t -------- 8.00 130: 0.4- -----------------F----------------i- F-------32:_.."_._.----- Paving -Paving Equipment � 2j 6.00' 132: 0.36 -----------------------------F----------------i----------- ------- Paving -Rollers 2� - ------ 6.00. 80: 0.38 ..................... --------------------------- ---------------- F---------�............._ Paving ;Tractors/LoadersBackhoes ------------- 111 ------- 8.00� 97: 0.37 ----------------------------1---------------------------}-- I•- }-------------:...___.------- Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1' 6.00• 78' 0.48 Trios and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 61 15.00- 0.001 0.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.00;LD_Mix HDT_Mix IHHDT •...............:---------------F----------I...__..._-.----------r-----------I----------4----------I--------------I----------= — Site Preparation 7i 18.00. 0.001 0.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix :HHDT 1 .- ._...---- --------- "�-----" - - - Grading 6� 15.00- 0.001 0.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.60 LD_Mix :HDT_Mix IHHDT Building Construction 91 59.00: 23.001 0.00: 14.701 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix -HDT_Mix HHDT - .--------i--------- -------- --------_ -_-'._.------ Paving 81 20,00: 0.001 0.00. 14.701 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix -HDT_Mix lHHDT 1 --------1 Architectural Coating 1- 12.00• 0.00• 0.00. 14.70- 6.90� 20.00-LD_Mix -HDT_Mix -HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site RC6 NOx CO I S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.51rotal Sio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 CateSory Ib/day lb/day Of`-ROa3 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0 0388 1.6587 1.6587 1.5419 1.5419 •3.747.704 3,747.704 1.058: 3.774.153 i 9 9 6 Total 3.3121 312010 21.7532 0,0388 1,6587 1.6587 1,5419 1.5419 ,3,747.704,3,747.704 1.0580 3,774,153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bemardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM70 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 MOW 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 , 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 ______ __ ___ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ____ ______ i ., ,, -p T T T T T T�� T T -------------------------------------------- -TT Worker 0.0819 25 0.6746 1.7000e- . 0.1677 1.1000e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0100e- 0.0455 ! 169.5126 169.5126 r 5.1700e- 169.6420 003 003 003 i 003 Total 0.0819 0,0525 0.6746 1.7000e- 0.1677 1.1000e- , 0.1688 r 0.0445 ' 1.0100e. 0.0455 169.5126 r 169.5126 5.1700e- , ' 169.6420 11 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.STotal Bid-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day lb/day Off-Road 3,3121 33.2010 . 21.7532 0.0388 1.6587 1.6587 1.5419 1.5419 1 0.0000 .3,747.704.3,747.704 . 1.0580 3.774.153 i 9 9 6 Total •' 3.3121 r 33.2010 r 21.7532 0.0388 , ' 1.6587 ' 1.6587 r , 1.5419 , 1.5419 0.0000 3,747.704,3,747.704' 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM70 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Iblday lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i ______ __ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______i_______ ______ ______ ______ • m r r r r r w r r •' Y r______ r r r T_____ Vendor 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 1 ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______1__ ____ ______ ______ ______ ______ r r r 7- r T Y - r r r T Worker •• 0.0819 • 0.0525 • 0.6746 • 1.7000e- • 0.1677 • 1.1000e- � 0.1688 • 0.0445 • 1.0100e- � 0.0455 1 � 169.5126 • 169.5126 • 5.1700e- • �169.6420 003 003 003 j 003 i Total 0.0819 0.0525 0.6746 1.7000e- ' 0.1677 , 1.1000e• ' 0.1688 0.0445 1 1.0100e. ' 0.0455 169.5126 169.5126 5.1700e- ' 169.6420 003 003 003 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day lb/day Fugitive Oust 1&0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 • 0.0000 1 i O8-Road •• 4.0765 • 42.4173 • 21.5136 0.0380 • 2,1974 2.1974 • 2.0216 2.0216 ± : 3,685.101 3.685.101 1.1918 • •3,714.897 i 6 6 5 i Total 4.0765 ' 42A113 ' 21.5136 ' 0.0380 , 18.0663 2.1974 20.2637 9.9307 2.0216 ' 11.9523 1 3,685.101 '3,685.101 • 1.1918 ' '3,714.897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 • 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 i ----""""__'n_______ ______r------r------r------r------r------r------r______T____-__--_.__.--------r---___r______�__----- .. Vendor •• 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0,0000 • 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 ? 0.0000 i i .............r______ _______r______r______.r______r______r______r______r______r_______y_.___.. ______r._3.4151 ______r______t- 3.570 Worker 0.0982 • 0.0631 • 0.8095 • 2.0400e- 0.2012 1.3200e- . 0.2025 . 0.0534 � 72100e- 0.0546 � 203.4157 203.4151 • 62100e- • • 203.5704 003 003 003 i 003 i Total 0.0982 , 0.0631 0.8095 2.0400e- 0,2012 1.3200e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2100e• 0.0546 203.4151 203.4151 , 6.2100e• 203.5704 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO $02 Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 1&0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 I 0.0000 0.0000 i , Off-Road 4.0765 . 42.4173 • 21.5136 • 0.0380 • 2.1974 . 2.1974 • 2.0216 2.0216 0.0000 •3,685.701 3,685.101 T 1.1918_T__----T 3,714.897 i 6 6 5 i Total 4.0765 42.4173 21,5136 ' 0.0380 18.0663 2.1974 ' 20.2637 ' 9.9307 , 2.0216 ' 11.9523 0.0000 3,685.101 '3,685'101 , 1.1918 1 ,3,714.897 11 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 11 of28 Date: 2/7/20204:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bemardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation -2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 ................... _ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______f_______ ______ ______ ______ ______ T- ______T- r r r T r r T Y r r ' w r t Vendor •� 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 f ____ _ _ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______1_______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ... •ir T- r r r T Y ,� r r r T ... Worker 0.0962 0.0631 • 0.8095 • 2.0400e- • 0.2012 1.3200e- • 0.2025 0.0534 1.2100e- 0.0546 203.4151 203.4151 6.2100e- � • 203.5704 003 003 003 003 1 •Total 0.0982 0.0631 1 0.8095 2.0400e- 1 0.2012 1 1.3200e- ' 0.2025 0.0534 ' 1.2100e• , 0.0546 203.4151 • 203.4151 6.2100e. 1 • 203.5704 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 i T T T T T• T T T Y• ,T Y. • r T T T t Off-Road •� 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 0.0297 • 1.2734 • 1.2734 • 1.1716 1.1716 ± •2,872.485•2,872.485• 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1 6 3 Total 2.4288 ' 26.3859 • 16.0530 ' 0.0297 ' 6.5523 • 1.2734 • 7.8258 • 3.3675 1 1.1716 1 4.5390 2,872.485'2,872.4a5' 0.9290 • ,2,895.710 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM 10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Iblday r auhng 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 1 _ Vendor 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 1 ______ ______ ______ ______ _______ -___--_____••'---------------T------T------T------ 1.1-'--'•-______"______T______ T Y ,� +� T T T Worker � 0.0819 � 0.0525 � 0.6746 � 1 7000e- � 0.1677 . 1.1000e- . 0.1688 � 0.0445 � 1.0100e- � 0.0455 1 � 169.5126 � 169.5126 . 5.1700e- � . 169.6420 003 003 003 1 003 i Total 0.0819 0,0525 0.6746 1.7000e. 0.1677 1.11000e- , 0.1688 , 0.0445 ' 1.0100e- 0.0455 169.5126 169.5126 5.1700e- 169.6420 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 OMNI 0.0000 1 __•_.. ______, ______, 1 , . , , , • T T T T T T 'r T T Y 1� T T T T Of/-Road •• 2.4288 26.3859 . 16.0530 0.0297 . . 1.2734 1.2734 . 1.1716 1.1716 0.0000 .2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1 1 6 1 Total 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 ' 0.0297 , 6.5523 ' 1.2734 ' 7.82511 1 3.3675 1.1716 4.5390 0.0000 2,872.485 '2,872.485 ' 0.9290 2,895.710 1 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 28 Date:2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bemardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading -2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0,0000 0,0000 MOM 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 ± 0-0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 ' � I 1 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 Worker 0.0819 0.0525 0.6746 1.7000e- 0.1677 7.1000e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0100e- 0.0455 ± 169.5126 169.5126 5.1700e- 169.6420 ' 003 003 003 y 003 i Total 0.0819 0,0525 0.6746 1.7000e- 0.1677 1.1000e- 0,1688 0.0445 1.0100e- 0.0455 169.5126 , 169.5126 ' 5.1700e- 169.6420 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOz I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 N8io-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day Ib/day Off-Road 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1,1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 j -2,553.063 -2,553.063, 0.6229 2.568.634 y 7 1 5 i Total . 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1 1.1171 1.1171 ' 1.0503 ' 1.0503 1 2,553.06312,553.063 0.6229 ' 2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CC2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 002e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0M00 0.0000 1 -----------^_______r------"""'' """' '------"------ "'-"�------"------T----"' ---' ______ Vendor 0.0698 2.4272 0.4730 6.2400e- 0.1473 0.0112 0.1585 0.0424 0.0107 0.0531 ' ______T______ ------ ------ �658.0332 . 658.0332 0.0427 T ?659.1017 003 •, Y Y T T T - T Y T Y - ------- I T T t -- Worker •� 0.3220 � 0.2067 � 2.6534 . 6.7000e- . 0.6595 � 4.3200e- . 0.6638 . 0.1749 � 3.9800e- � 0.1789 � � 666.7496 - 666.7496 � 0.0204 667.2585 003 003 003 1 Total u 0.3918 ' 2.6338 1 3.1264 ' 0.0129 ' 0.8068 0.0155 0.8223 ' 0.2173 0.0147 0.2320 1,324,782 1324.782 0.0631 1,326.360 8 8 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust I PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 N6io-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib1day Off-Road 2.1198 19.1860 . 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 . 1.1171 1,0503 1.0503 i 0.0000 -2,553.063-2,553.063 i 0.6229 i 2,568.634 1 1 1 5 i 1 Total 2.1198 1 19.1860 1 16.8485 0.0269 ' ' 1.1171 , 1.1171 ' 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 '2,553.063•2,553.063' 0.6229 , 1 2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 i 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i ........... _____ ___________ 1 ______ _ ., r r i r r r r i i______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______ _______ ______ _ •r r r r r r r r r T Y r r r , Vendor � 0.0698 r 2.4272 r 0.4730 � 6.2400e- r 0.1473 r 0.0112 r 0.1585 r 0.0424 � 0.0107 � 0.0531 � � 658.0332�658.0332 r 0.0427 659.1017 003 1 1 _____ ---------------------------- Worker r r . r r r r , , r r r r ....... ______.y.______r______r______T______r__�__r______r______r______T_______Y •� 0-3220 � 0.2067 � 2.6534 � 6.7000e- r 0.6595 � 4.3200e- r 0.6638 � 0.1749 � 3.9800e- � 0.1789 �- � 666.7496 r 666.7496 0.0204 �667.2585 003 003 003 1 Total 0.3918 2.6338 3.1264 0.0129 0.8068 0.0155 0.8223 0.2173 0.0147 0.2320 1,324.782 r 1,324.782 0.0631 1,326.360 8 8 2 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CC I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.9009 174321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 r 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 ± 2.553.363 2.553.363 0,6160 2568.764 1 9 9 3 i Total 1.9009 17,4321 16.5752 0.0269 0,9586 0.9586 r 0.9013 r 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction -2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category May lb/day Hauling 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 l., , , Vendor 0.0595 2.2181 0.4174 6.2000e- 0,1473 3.8000e- 0.1511 r 0.0424 3.6400e- 0.0461 a 654.5554 r 654.5554 r 0.0414 655.5895 003 003 003 + , •,- r r T r r r r •r T Y r Worker 0.2998 0.1853 2.4425 6.4800e- r 0.6595 4.2200e- 0.6637 0.1749 3.8800e- r 0.1788 1 � 645.5075 r 645.5075 r 0.0184 - 645.9668 003 003 003 Total 0.3593 2.4034 2.8599 1 0.0127 0.8068 8.0200e. 1 0.8148 0.2173 7.5200e- ' 0.2248 1 1,300.062 , 1,300.062, 0.0597 1 1,301.556 003 003 9 9 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 1 Fugitive Exhaust PM2s Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day Wday 7ff-Road 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 1 0.0000 2.553.363 r 2,553.363 0.6160 2.568.764 yj 9 9 3 � 1 Total •, 1.9009 ' 17.4321 ' 16.5752 ' 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553,363 r 2,553.363 0.6160 '2,568.764 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bemardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 1 ............ ___ 5_w______w_ ____w__-___w___ 3_.r______w______w______w______r_______t....... ____4w------ t.....- Vendor � 0.0595 � 2.2181 r 0.4174 � 6.2000e- . 0.1473 . 3.8000e- 0.1511 • 0.0424 � 3.6400e- � 0.0461 ± �654.5554 • 654.5554 0.0414 655.5895 ' D03 003 003 --------- ---------------------- + i Worker 0.2998 0.1853 . 2.4425 6.4800e- 0.6595 4.2200e- 0.6637 0.1749 • 3.8800e- . 0.1788 ± 645.5075 645.5075 0.0184 645.9668 003 003 003 i Total 0,3593 2.4034 2.8599 0.0127 0.8068 8.0200e- , 0.8148 ' 0.2173 ' 7.5200e- ' 0.2248 1.300.062 1,300.062 0.0597 1,3013.556 003 003 9 9 3 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day Ib/day Off-Road 1.0940 10.8399 12.2603 0.0189 0.5788 . 0.5788 . 0.5342 0.5342 1 • 1.804.552. 1.804.552 0.5670 1,818,727 3 3 0 ............... w w w w w w- T Y r• w w w T Paving 0.1164 0.0000 . 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t, Total 1,2104 10.8399 12.2603 0.0189 , 0.5788 ' 0.5788 ' ' 0.5342 ' 0.5342 1,804.552 1,804.552 0.5670 ' 11,818.727 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bemardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5rotal Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 ± 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i ........... ______ _______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______t_______ ______ ______ ______ ____ P 1 T T T T T T Y T Y r______ T T Y T ••_ Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t , ., , , , i , , 1 r ____ ______ _•_••____-_^'______"______Y------ --____"______•"'----"------"-______'_----" T 1 Y T �T Worker 0.1016 0.0628 0.8280 2.2000e- 0.2236 1.4300e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3200e- 0.0606 218.8161 218.8161 6.2300e- 218.9718 003 003 003 t 003 i I Total 0.1016 0.0628 0.8280 2.2000e- 0.2236 1.4300e. 0.2250 0.0593 1.3200e. 0.0606 218.8161 218.8161 , 6.2300e- ' 218.9718 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0940 10.8399 12.2603 0.0189 0.5788 0.5788 0.5342 0.5342 ± 0.0000 1,804.552 1,804.552 0.5670 1,818.727 3 3 0 Paving 0.1164 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2104 ' 10.8399 ' 12.2603 0.0189 ' 0.5788 , 0.5788 0.5342 0.5342 0.0000 1,804.552, 1,804.552 ' 0.5670 ' 1,818.727 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOz CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ___________ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _____ ______ ______ ______ _______1 _ ____ T y n- w T T w w� w w w ' ' Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i ______ Worker � 0.1016 � 0.0628 � 0.8280 � 2.2000e- � 0.2236 � 1.4300e- � 0.2250 � 0.0593 � 1.3200e- � 0.0606 � � 218.8161 � 218.8161 � 6.2300e-r ?218.9718 003 003 003 y 003 i Total 0.1016 0-0628 0.8280 2.2000e- , 0.2236 1.4300e- ' 0.2250 0.0593 1.3200e- 0.0606 218.8161 218.8161 6.2300e- 218.9718 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Archit.Coating 5C0897 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 i i i T Y T w w + Off-Road 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 003 1 Total 54.3086 ' 1.5268 , 1.8176 , 2.9700e. ' 0.0941 0.0941 ' 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 ' 281.4481 ' 0.0193 , ' 281.9309 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating -2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site RCG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i ______ Vendor 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r r 0,0000 i i Worker a 0.0610 r 0.0377 r 0.4968 r 1.3200e- r 0.1341 r B.6000e- r 0.1350 r 0.0356 � 7.9000e- � 0.0364 i � 131.2897 r 131.2897 r 3.7400e- � � 131.3831 003 004 004 1 003 i Total 0.0610 0.0377 0.4968 1.3200e- , 0.1341 8.6000e- ' 0.1350 0.0356 7.9000e- 0.0364 131.2897 1 131.2897 r 3.7400e- 131.3831 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Archit Coating 54,0897 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 i ______ i ____ ______ ______ ______ ______ , w T • r w w w t_______ Off-Road 0.2189 r 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 r 0.0941 r r 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 r 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 003 i i Total 54.3086 ' 1.5268 1.8176 1 2.9700e- 1 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 1 0.0000 281.4481 r 281.p81 r 0.0193 281.9309 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating -2021 Miticiaated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Iblday Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 x t Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 ____ ______ ______ 1_ __ _______ ______ ______ _______ Worker 0.0610 0.0377 - 0.4968 1.3200e- 0.1341 8.6000e- ' 0.1350 0.0356 7.9000e- ' 0.0364 131.2897 131.2897 3.7400e- - 131.3831 003 004 004 r 003 t Total 0.0610 0.0377 0.4968 1.3200e- 0.1341 8.6000e- 0.1350 0.0356 7.9000e. 0,0364 131.2897 131.2897 3.7400e. 131.3831 003 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bemardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOz CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NSio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •• 0.5455 • 3.5753 T2094 0.0287 2.1655 • 0.0191 • 2.1a45 • 0.5795 • 0.0178 0.5973 -2,921.767•2,921.767• 0.1332 i 2,925.096 9 9 8 _______....______-______-______-______T______-______ _____.r______ ______.•._______ ___.__.-______T______T______T______t.. Unmitigatetl 0.5455 3.5753 7.2094 0.0287 2.1655 0.0191 2.1845 0.5795 0.0178 0.5973 -2,921.767•2,921.767• 0.1332 2,925.0965.096 9 9 8 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0,00 0.00 ............ _F___________.. _ _______________________ ________________________ Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 1 --- Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 118.49 118.49 1 118.49 __ 507.821 _ _ __ _507,821 ..................................... ---------"'--F-----------�' __4. _____.___p_ .._..._.__ Ururaingerated Warehouse-No Rail 118.49 118.49 1 118.49 507,821 507,821 Total 236.98 236.98 236.98 1,015'643 1,015,643 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by •Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 0 0 0• Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 . 0.00 1 0.00 0 0 0 efrigerated Warehouse-No••�__-16.60-__ ---8.40 -- 6.90_ _-59.00 -' 0.00- _i 41.00-__ ........................................3 •R Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHDt LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY SBUS MH Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.553113• 0.036408i 0.180286i 0.116335i 0.016165i 0.005101i 0.018218i 0.063797i 0.001357i 0.001565i 0.005903i 0.000808i 0.000944 Ali-------....9..Lot................}------- ---------._______+____-__+_______+____-__.t.-------t._---___i.._______+_____----______- ------- Parkin 0.553113- 0.0364081 0.1802861 0.1163351 0.0161651 0.0051011 0.0182181 0.0637971 0.0013571 0.0015651 0.0059031 0.0008081 0.000944 --------+-------+-------+-------+------- -------+-------+------- -------+-------+------- Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail• 0.553113• 0.0364081 0.1802861 0.1163351 0.0161651 0.0051011 0.0182181 0.0637971 0.0013571 0.0015661 0.0059031 0.000808t 0.000944 .......................3-------- -------1 1 1 I ------1 I 1 1 I 1 1 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No • 0.553113• 0.036408• 0.180286• 0.116335• 0.016165• 0.005101• 0.018218• 0.063797• 0.001357• 0.001565• 0.005903• 0.000808• 0.000944 Rail 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM Fugitive I Exhaust JPM2.5TotaI Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day Ib/day NaturalGas 0.0826 • 0.7509 0.6308 4.5100e. 0.0571 00571 0.0571 0.0571 i 901.0800 901,0800 0.0173 0.0165 906A347 Mitigated 003 r 3 NaturalGas 0.0826 0.7509 0.6308 4.5100e- 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 901.0800 • 901.0800 0.0773 0.0165 • 906.4347 Unmitigated 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Iblday lb/day Other Non- 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces •• M Y i Y Y Y Y Y Y T 1 ,- Y i Y T Parking Lot 0 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 1 0.0000 r 0.0000 r • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 • 0.0000 4 • r i , ,........... TTT "'_•� ••"""'.8""773'8 T18_6_7_.0_7_3_87_0_.0_1_6_6_T_0_.0_1_5_9_T18.7_2..2_2_64Refrigerated "0.6"07"0 _4._340o-T"'""T".'549T"0.0"54"9 i """' r 0".0'5-4"9 I "0"0549 Warehouse-No ' ' I ' 003 I' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I I Rail • •: I r 1 1 I I I 1 I • 1 1 I 1 Unrefrigerated 289.053 •• 3.1200e- I 0.0283 i 0.0238 11.7000e- I 12.1500e- i 2.7500e- I 12.1500e- i 2.1500e- 34.0062 r 34.0062 16.5000e- 16.2000e- I 34.2083 Warehouse-No ; 003 i 004 003 003 003 i 003 i 004 004 i Rail Total 0.0826 0.7509 0.6308 4.5100e- 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 901.0800 901.0800 0.0173 0.0165 906.4347 003 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG I NOx 1 CO 7 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 I CP7 N20 I CO2e s Use PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Other Non- 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; 6, ----------- ------n--------------------------------------------------_______ --___ _______+ __-_ - _______ -_-__ _____ ____ ._.._ Parking Lot 0 A: 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • • 0.0000 • 0.0000 r-0.0000 T 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 w 0.0000 r 0.0000 ? 0.0000 r + .•-___----------T--_---T--_---T------T------T------T"-___-7------T-___--T...... --------------T------T------T------T"--•--- Refrigerated 7.37013 •� 0.0795 t 0.7226 r 0.6070 14.3400e- i r 0.0549 t 0.0549 i t 0.0549 r 0.0549 • 867.0738 i 867.0738 i 0.0166 r 0.0159 t 872.2264 Warehouse-No 003 r i t r i i t t t i t t r Rail .-.------.-I..-----o--3.-1 t------t------t------t------t------t------t------t------i--------I-------�------t------t------t------t-----.. Unrefrigerated • 0.289053•• 3.1200e- 1 0.0283 i 0.0238 r 1.7000e- i i 2.1500e- i 2.1500e- r i 2.1500e- r 2.1500e- • 34.0062 t 34.0062 r 6.5000e- i 6.2000e- i 34.2083 Warehouse-No 003 i I 1 004 1 i 003 1 003 I 1 003 1 003 I 1 004 004 1 Rail Total 0.0826 0.7509 0.6308 4.5100e- 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 901.0800 901.0800 0.0173 0.0165 906.4347 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bemardino-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOz I CO I S02 Fugitive I Exhaust I PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust JPM2.57rotal Blo-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day lb/day Mitigated 2.3395 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 7.0000e- 7.0000e- 7.000Oe- 7.0000e- + 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 i 004 1 ___ ------ ------- ------...------„------T------T-------Y------- Unmitigated •• 2.3395 1.8000e- 0.019E 0.0000 7.0000e- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e• ' 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBic-0O2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory lb/day IWday P.-cracctu'el 0.2667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 1 1 Consumer 2.0709 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products 1 • ••••� T T T T T T T T T Y r T - Landscaping 1.8400e- ' 1.8000e- ' 0.0198 ' 0.0000 r ' 7.000Oe- ' 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- ' 7.0000e- + 0.0423 ' 0.0423 ' 1.1000e- 0.0451 003 004 005 005 005 005 j 004 a Total 2.3395 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 , 7.0000e- ' 7.000Oe- ' 7.0000e- 7.0000e- 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- 0.0451 004 005 OOs 005 005 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOz CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 I NBic-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural 0.2667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coaling 1 1 i r r r r r r r � � i r Consumer 2.0709 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products 1 r r r r r i r r r T r r 1 r T• r r----------- Landscaping 1.6400e- 1.8OOOe- r 0.0198 0.0000 r 7.00OOe- r 7.00OOe- r r 7.00OOe- 7.00OOe- 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- 0.0651 , 003 004 005 005 005 005 1 004 i Total 2.3395 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 ' 7.0000e- ' 7.00OOe- ' 7.0000e- ' 7.00OOe- 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- , 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Summer Equipment Type Number Hours/Day HoursNear Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Xebec Warehouse Project San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 51.97 1000sgft 1.19 51,972.50 i 0 Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 51.97 1000sgft 1.19 51,972.50 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.50 1000sgft 0.01 500.00 0 Parking Lot 89.00 Space 0.80 35,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed(m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq(Days) 32 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2022 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4 Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics- Vehicle Trips - Consistent with 237 daily trips (see Planning Commission Staff Report, February 2020) CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblLand Use LandUseSquareFeet 51,970.00 51,972.50 _____________________________.p.-_._._________ _____________r_____________________________f-----------......--------- tblLandUse LandUseSq uareFeet 51,970.00 51,972.50 •----------------------------4---------•.._.__.._....._-_..,t------------------------------ ------'_-- tblVehideTri s ST_TR 1.68 i 2.28 '•'-------------------------- ------------------------------f---------_________._______ tblVehideTdps ST_TR 1.68 2.28 ..................P__........ ___•------------------------------------------ -------------------------- tblVehideTri s SU_TR 1.68 2.28 --------•-------------------- T------------------------------ " .................... tblVehideTrips SU_TR 1.68 i 2.28 .............................4------------------------------------------------------------i-•---•-----..."----'•"-- tblVehicdeTri s WD_TR 1.68 2.28 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.68 2.28 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMOd Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year Ibfday Ib/day 2020 4.1748 42.4837 22.3076 0.0403 18.2675 2.1987 20.4662 9.9840 20228 12.0069 ± 0.0000 3,899.767 3,899.767 1.1973 0.0000 3,926.329 y 4 4 6 L 2021 19.8214 r 19.0666 • 0.0387 r 0.8068 r 0.9668 1.7735 0.2173 • 0.9089 r 1.1262 + 0.0000 3,761.578 r 3,761.578 0.6780 • 0.0000 •3,778.527 y 3 3 9 f Maximum 54.3697 42.4837 ' 22.3076 ' 0.0403 ' 18.2675 • 2.1987 20.4662 • 9.9840 • 2.0228 r 12.0069 0.0000 3,899.767 3,899.767 1.1973 0.0000 ' 3,926.329 4 4 6 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugftive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 LL PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Year lb/day lb/day 2020 4,1748 42.4837 22.3076 0.0403 18.2675 2.1987 20.4662 9.9840 2.0228 12.0069 ± 0,0000 3,899.767 3,899.767 1.1973 0.0000 3,926,329 y 4 4 6 i 2021 •• 54.3697 • 19.8214 - 19.0668 - 0.0387 • 0.8068 • 0.9668 1.7735 - 0.2173 0.9089 1.1262 'A 0.0000 •3,761.578 r 3,761.578- 0.6780 0.0000 3,778.527 3 3 9 1 Maximum •• 54.3697 ' 42.4837 22.3076 0.0403 18.2675 • 2.1987 • 20.4662 • 9.9840 2.0228 12.0069 0.0000 •3,899.767•3,899.767 1.1973 ' 0.0000 •3,926.329 11 4 4 6 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Etc-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 om 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG I NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust I PMIO I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Area 2,3395 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 7.0000e- 7.0000e- 7.0000e- 7.00OOe- + 0.0423 0.0423 : 1.1000e- 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 J 004 Energy •• 0.0826 6.7509 0.6308 4.510Oe- ' 0.0571 0.0571 • 0.0571 0.0571 1 901.0800 ' 901.0800 ' 0.0173 0.0165 • 906.4347 003 i Y Y T -1 Y Y t Mobile 0.4798 • 3.5981 • 6.2328 • 0.0264 • 2.1655 0.0192 2.1847 0.5795 0.0180 0.5974 2,699.563 2,699.563• 0.1340 2,702.914 + 9 9 7 1 Total 2.9019 • 4.3492 6.8833 0.0310 • 2.1655 0.0763 2.2418 0.5795 0.0751 , 0.6546 1 •3,600.686 3,600,686• 0.1514 0.0165 ,3,609.394 3 3 5 Mitigated Operational ROG I Nos CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust IPM2.5rotal Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day Ib/day Area •• 2.3395 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 • 7.00OOe- 7.00OOe- • 7.00OOe- • 7.0000e- + 0.0423 • 0.0423 • 1.t000e- 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 i O04 Y T T T 1 T Y •- T T 1 Energy •• 0.0826 � 0.7509 � 0.6308 � 4.5100e- • • 0.0571 - 0.0571 • • 0.0571 • 0.0571 � • 901.0800 � 901.0800 ' 0.0173 � 0.0165 ?906.4347 003 + 7 T l T T Y Y l T • r l T '1 Mobile •• 0.4798 3.5981 6.2328 0.0264 ' 2.1655 0.0192 2.1847 - 0.5795 ' 0.0180 0.5974 1 2,699.563 2,699.563• 0.1340 • •2,702.914 + 9 9 7 + Total 2.9019 • 4.3492 6.8833 0.0310 • 2.1655 • 0.0763 • 2.2418 ' 0.5795 • OA751 0.6546 1 3,600.686 3,600.686 0.1514 0.0165 3,609.394 3 3 5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG NOz CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days Phase Description Number I Week 1 -Demolition -Demolition 2/6/2020 :3/4/2020 5 20: 2 :Site Preparation :Site Preparation 3/5/2020 :3/11/2020 5: 5: ___________ ___________________ ------------------------j------------4------------4 3 •Grading :Grading 3/12/2020 :3/23/2020 5: 8� 4 -Building Construction :Building Construction -3124/2020 :2/8/2021 5: 230: 5 •Paving :Paving 2/9/2021 3/4/2021 5: 18: 6 -Architectural Coating -Architectural Coating :3/5/2021 -3130/2021 5• 18- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0.81 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 155,918; Non-Residential Outdoor: 51,973; Striped Parking Area: 2,166 (Architectural Coating—sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Phase Name Oftroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor De-r Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 i 800; 81. 0.73 Demoliti ' t H--- ------------i -------------t-------------- --•-- -------------- Demolition --------------- 3i!! 8.00� 158: 0.38 -------'--'------F----------------Y'------------F----------Y---------...'_ Demolition -Rubber Tired Dozers 21 8.00: 247: 0.40 ............................._---------------------------F----------------i-------------F— Site Preparation -Rubber Tired Dozers 3 i 8.00: 247: 0.40 ................. r - - --- --------- ----------------i -------------r— --- 1 -------------- Site Preparation •TractOrs/Loaders/Backhoes 41 8.00: 97: 0.37 -•-------------r - F----------------i---------- .--F----------- .............. Grading-----------------------�Exoavators-------------------� 11 -------- 8.00: 158'---._..... 0.38 Grading :Graders 14 8.00: 187: 0.41 ••r---------------------------I ----------------1 ------ ---------- Grading -Rubber Tired Dozers 11 8.00: 247: 0.40 --------••-----------•---------------------------------I ----------------i i---- Grading - _ :Tractors/LoadersBackhoes 31 - __- 8.00: 97: 0.37 -------------- -------------- ----------------a F------ Building Construction -Cranes 11 7.00: 231: 0.29 ............................i---------------------------H----------------a _--_- F-------�--- Building Construction :Forklifts 1 3!t! 8.00: 89: 0.20 '...........-------'........_---------------------------H----------------i----'--------F-''------1'----------- ..- Building Construction -Generator Sets 1 t 8.00: 84: 0.74 ..-.........................t---------------------------F----------------I-------------F---------- Building Construction :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 31 7.00: 97: 0.37 ------------------------- ---'H---_—;. ...-•-------- Building Construction Welders 11 -- 8.00: 46: 0.45 ............................ ----"'-'----'t'---------------- -----_- F------1....-----_----- Paving •Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 - -_-- - 6.00� 9: 0.56 ............................:..'------------------------F---------------- - F----------- -----------'-- Paving ---_-----_-:Pavers----- 11 --_ 8.00: 130: 0.42 _________________ -------F----------------�------ F---------s------------•- li Paving :Paving Equipment- 2t 6.00: 132: 0.36 ..... ------------' Paving ;Rollers 2t 6.00� 80: 0.38 Paving ----------------------- Tractors/Loaders-----oes-------F---------------1I----------8.00E-- 97� 0.37 ....'____._'_'_.' F--------------------------}----------------4-------------4--------------' Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00- 78- 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4,54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip I Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6i 15.00 0.00i 0.00. 14.701 6,90: 20.00;LD_Mix -HDT_Mix IHHDT .................---------------1 "-—"--i t ---------H----------I- t t----------I--------- I--------------I-------- SitePrepara8on 7� 18.00: 0.001 0.00• 14.70, 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix -HDT_Mix IHHDT ------".------- ---------i----------t-------- 4----------I--------------I------------------ - - Cxading 6t 15.00• 0.00 0.00: 14.70t 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix -HDT_Mix IHHDT Bu t;--- —� --------- ------- ---------t 4----------I--------------I----------=...._.. . . ilding Construction 91 59.00• 0.00: 14.70 23.001t 1 6.901 20.00:LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix IHHDT t Paving 81 20.00- 0.001 0.00. 14,701 6.90: 20.00:LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix IHHDT ---------------- 4---------- T---------4-----------'H----------1i ------4-------------4----------'=---------- Architectural Coating 1• 12.00• 0.00: 0.00: 14.70- 6.90- 20.00-LD_Mix •HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx I CO S02 Fugrtive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bid-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0o388 1.6587 1.6587 1.5419 1.5419 . 3,747.704 ,3,747.704 , 1.0580 3 774 151 9 9 0 Total 3.3121 ' 33.2010 , 21.7532 1 0.0388 1.6587 1.6587 1.5419 1,5419 '3,747.704'3,747.704 1.0580 3.774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition -2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total BIo.CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 M000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______1__ _____ ______ ______ ______ T Y T T Y T Y •....ram Y T T `.• Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 t t ______ ______ ............r______ _______T___-_.r___-_Y______T-_____T______Y______Y______.•________y____.._-______T______ Worker 0.0819 � 0.0553 • 0.5544 • 1.5300e- • 0.1677 � 1.1000e- • 0.1688 • 0.0445 � 1.0100e- 0.0455 � � 152.0625 � 152.0625 T4.5400e T • 152.1760 003 003 003 1 003 1 Total 0.0819 • 0.0553 ' 0.55" 1.5300e- ' 0.16'n 1.1000e- • 0.16 044 88 • 0. 5 ' 1.0100e- • 0.0455 152.0625 ' 152.0625 4.5400e. • 152.1760 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Oft-Road 3.3121 33,2010 21.7532 0.0388 1.6587 • 1.6587 1.5419 1.5419 0.0000 :3,747,704 -3,747.704• 1.0580 1 3,774.153 y 9 9 6 i •Total 3.3121 • 33.2010 21.7532 • 0.0388 • • 1.65117 , 1.6587 • • 1.5419 • 1.5419 0.0000 '3,747.704• 3,747.704• 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project - San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Miticraated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category IWday lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r T ♦ .....- w r r + Ventlor •� 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _ _ _____ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ___ _ _______i_______ ______ _______ ______ _______ ••,� w T T T T T T T T Y ,� i T T t-- _____ Worker 0.0819 0.0553 0.5544 1.5300e- 0.1677 1.1000e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0100e- 0.0455 i � 152.0625 152.0625 4.5400e- 152.1760 003 003 003 t 003 t Total 0.0819 0.0553 0.5544 1.5300e- 0.1677 ' 1.1000e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0100e- 0.0455 152.0625 152.0625 , 4.5400e- 152.1760 11 003 003 003 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO $02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 i j 0.0000 0.0000 r -.- - - _r______r______r______r______r______r______r______r______T_______ -..-... ______r______r______r______t.--.-.- Off-Road 65 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 2.1974 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 3,685.101 305.101 r 1.1918 -3,714.897 6 6 5 1 Total 4,0765 42.4173 , 21.5136 0.0380 , 18.0663 ' 2.1974 ' 20.2637 9.9307 ' 2.0216 ' 11.9523 1 ,3,685.101 r 3,685.101 ' 1.1918 , 3,714.897 6 B 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation -2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ 1 _______ ______ ______ ______ _ .. r r T r T r T r Y •, r r r t....... Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 i { .._ -.-....,r______w______r6____.r______r______.r______r______r______r______T_______Y_.._...r______r__-__ri ______T______T.__..• Worker 0.0983 0.0663 0.6653 r 1.8300e- 0.2012 1.3200e- 0.2025 0.0534 1.2100e- 0.0546 182.4750 182.4750 5.4500e- - 182.6112 . 003 003 003 y 003 Total 0.0983 0.0663 0.6653 11.8300e- 0-2012 ' 1.3200e- r 0.2025 ' 0.0534 r 1.2100e- r 0.0546 182.4750 182.4750 5.4500e• 1 182.6112 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 18,0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 i r , , r , r , , .._-__-____,..r______r_______.r______T______r______r______r______r______r______r_______Y Off-Road 4.0765 r 42.4173 r 21.5136 r 0.0380 2.1974 r 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 A 0.0000 3,685.101 r 3,685.101 1.1918 3,714.897 6 6 5 Total 4.0765 r 42.4173 ' 21.5136 1 0.0380 ' 18.0663 r 2.1974 r 20.2637 r 9.9307 ' 2,0216 ' 11.9523 0.0000 '3,685.101 r 3,685.101 1.1918 ' r 3,714'897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugiive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NElio-CO2 TotsICO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 { 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i Worker F 0.0983 . 0.0663 • 0.6653 1.8300e- 0.2012 • 1.3200e- r 0.2025 • 0.0534 • 1.2100e- r 0.0546 { 162A750 182.4750 5.4500e- 182.6112 003 003 003 i 003 { Total 0.0983 0.0663 0.6653 1.8300e. 0.2012 , 1.3200e- ' 0.2025 r 0.0534 r 1.2100e- , 0.05" 182.4750 182.4750 5.4500e- 182.6112 11 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 i Off-Road •• 2.4288 • 26.3859 r 16.0530 0.0297 r 1.2734 • 1.2734 r 1.1716 1.1716 1 •2,872.485 2.872.485 0.9290 r •2,895.710 + 1 6 { Total d 2.4288 26.3859 r 16.0530 , 0.0297 r 6.5523 , 1.2734 , 7.8258 r 3.3675 r 1.1716 , 4.5390 1 ,2,872.485'2,872.485 , 0.9290 ' r 2,8965.710 1 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading -2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBioCO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Iblday lb/day Hauling 0.0000 00000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 l i T------T------T---00-T---00-T---00-T---00-T--_-__r-0.0000 t•-_.-."'_______T___00-T---00-T------ Vendor •� 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 � 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 � 0.0000 r 0.0000 � � 0.0000 � 0.0000 r 0.0000 � ? 0.0000 i __ _ ___ ___ i ___.� r r i r r . r . ............^'______'-______'-______'-1.003 - 0,1677 1.003'-"'--""- 0.0445 1.003 -T 0.0455 ±'__'_..'-"-"'T"M25 4.003-_'---"'-"'__'__ Worker 0.0879 0.0553 0.5544 1 5300e- 0.1677 1.1000e- 0.7688 0.0445 1.0100e- � 0.0455 152.0625 � 152.0625 � 4.5400e- � � 152.1760 i i Total 0.0819 0.0553 0.55" 1.5300e. 0.1677 1.1000e. 0.1688 0.0445 1.0100e- ' 0.0455 152.0625 152.0625 4.5400e- 152.1760 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Iblday lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0,0000 3,3675 1 0.0000 0.0000 i ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ____ _______i_____ _ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ • A� T T T T T T T T �r 1 r• T T T t Off-Road 2.4288 r 26.3859 16.0530 r 0.0297 t2734 7.2734 1.1716 1.1716 i 0.0000 2.872.485 r 2,872.485 r 0.9290 2,895.710 i 1 1 6 i Total 2.4288 r 26.3859 r 16.0530 , 0.0297 ' 6.5523 1.2734 7.8258 , 3.3675 ' 1.1716 4.5390 0.0000 '2,872.485 1 2,872.485 r 0.9290 r ,2,895.710 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 C62e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day Iblday Hauling 0,0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 . , , i Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 t _ _____ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ _______i_______ ______ ______ ______ ______ •- i,- r T r r r r- r T Y ,� T �-- �•- t_ _____ Worker 0.0819 0.0553 0.5544 1.5300e- r 0.1677 1.1000e- 0.1688 0.0445 1.0100e- 0.0455 152.0625 152.0625 r 4.5400e- 152.1760 003 003 003 y 003 1 Total 0.0819 0.0553 0.5544 1.5300e- 0.1677 1.1000e. 0.1688 0.0445 1.0100e- , 0.0455 152.0625 152.0625 4.5400e- 152.1760 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day Iblday 71fif-Road 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 r 1.1171 r 1.1171 r 1.0503 1.0503 - 2,553.063 -2,553.063 r 0.6229 2.568,634 t 1 i 5 a Total 2.1198 19.1860 , 16.8485 ' 0,0269 ' r 1.1171 r 1.1171 r 1.0503 ' 1.0503 '2,553.063•2.55377, 0. 2229 1 '2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction -2020 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day Ib/day, Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 Vendor 0.0736 r 2.4075 r 0.5482 6.0000e- r 0.1473 r 0.0113 r 0.1586 r 0.0424 r 0.0108 0.0532 + 632.5003 r 632.5003 r 0.0473 r 633.6817 003 i r , r Worker 0.3222 0.2175 - 2.1806 6.0100e- r 0.6595 r 4.3200e- r 0.6638 r 0.1749 3.9800e- 0.1789 598.1124 r 598.1124 r 0.0179 598.5588 003 003 003 Total 0.3958 2.6249 2,7290 0.0120 ' 0.8068 0.0156 ' 0.8224 0.2173 0.0148 ' 0.2321 1,230.612,1,230.612 ' 0.0651 ' , 1,232.240 6 6 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO $02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 I CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day 17 7717 21198 19.1860 16.8465 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 j 0.0000 :2,553.063 r 2,553.063 r 0.6229 2.568.634 1 Total •' 2.1198 19.1860 r 16.8485 ' 0.0269 r r 1.1171 r 1.1171 1 1.0503 1.0503 1 0.0000 2,553.063 1 2,553,063 r 0.6229 ' 2,568.634 11 1 1 5 CalEEMOd Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction -2020 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 N8io-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Wday IWday Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 r_____ --------------- r r Vendor 0.0736 2.4075 r 0.5482 r 6.0000e- r 0.1473 r 0.0113 r 0.1586 r 0.0424 0.0108 0A532 + � 632.5003 r 632.5003 0.0473 633.6817 i 003 t i.• , , , . , , , r , , _..____ ___r ___r______r______r______, , Worker 0.3222 0.2175 2.1808 6.0100e- 0.6595 4.3200e- 0.6638 0.1749 3.9800e- 0.1789 598.1124 r 598.1124 r 0.0179 r r 598.5588 003 003 003 y Total 0.3958 2,6249 2,7290 0.0120 ' 0.8068 ' 0.0156 , 0.8224 1 0.2173 ' 0.0148 ' 0.2321 1,230.612 ' 1,230.612 1 0.0651 , , 1,232.240 11 6 6 4 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx I CO $02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Wday lb/day Off-Road •• 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 i •2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 t, 9 9 3 1 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 , 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 1 0.9013 1 0.9013 1 2,553.363 1 2.553.363 1 0.6160 ' 2,568.764 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction -2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 __ _______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______T_______Yi_______ ______ ______ ____ _ ______ _ Y Y T Y Y Y T Y Vendor •� 0.0631 � 2.7945 r 0.4882 � 5.9600e- � 0.1473 � 3.9100e- • 0.1512 r 0.0424 � 3.7400e- � 0.0462 � -629.1308 T629.1308 r 0.0459 �- ?630.2770 003 003 003 I Worker 0.3004 0.1949 2.0034 5.8100e- 0-6595 4.2200e- 0.6637 • 0.1749 3.8800e- 0.1788 1 579.0836 • 579.0836 • 0.0161 Y 579.4866 003 003 003 I I Total 0,3636 2.3893 2.4916 0.0118 0.8068 8.1300e. 0.8149 0.2173 7.6200e- ' 0.2249 ,1,208.214•1,208.214 0.0620 ' • 1,209.763 003 003 4 4 6 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1,9009 17,4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9556 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 i 0.0000 2,553.363 2,553,363• 0.6160 •2,568.764 I 9 9 3 I Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 ' 0.9013 0.0000 ,2,553.363•2,553.363• 0.6160 • ,2,568.764 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4 54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM70 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ 1 T Vendor 0.0631 • 2.1945 r 0.4682 Y5.9600e r 0.1473 T3.9100e-T 0.1512 T 0.0424 • 3.7400e- ' 0.0462 A 629.1308 ' 629.1308 ' 0.0459 • • 630.2770 003 003 1., , , I 003 , w� r •r r r r r r •r �- 1 r r T r t Worker 0.3004 0.1949 2.0034 � 5.8100e- � 0.6595 � 4.2200e- • 0.6637 • 0.1749 � 3.8800e- ' 0.1788 ± 579.0836 • 579.0836 • 0.0161 579.4866 003 003 003 t 7al0.3636 2.3893 2.4916 0.0118 0.8068 8.1300e- 0.8149 0.2173 7.6200e- 1 0.2249 1 1 1,208.214 1,208.214 0.0620 1 1,209.763 003 003 4 4 6 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx I CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust 1PIAl Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0940 10.8399 • 12.2603 0.0189 0.5788 0.5788 0.5342 • 0.5342 ± 1.804.552 1,804.552 • 0.5670 1.616.727 3 3 0 Paving •• 0.1164 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' 0.0000 1 0.0000 ' T T 0.0000 t t Total 1.2104 10.8399 ' 12.2603 ' 0.0189 ' 0.5788 0.5788 1 0.5342 1 0.5342 1,804.552 1,804.552 0.5670 1,818.727 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County,Winter 3.6 Paving -2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOz I CO I S02 I Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0,0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 { 1 Y T T Y Y Y Y T Y... - Y T T Vendor •• 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 • - 0.0000 •�� Y Y Y T Y Y Y Y T Y T Y Y t Worker 0.1018 0.0661 0.6791 1.9700e- 0.2236 • 1.4300e- 0.2250 0.0593 • 1.3200e- • 0.0606 196.2995 • 196.2995 5.4600e- 196.4361 , 003 003 003 { 003 Total 0.1018 0.0661 0.6791 1.9700e- 0.2236 1.4300e- 0.2250 • 0.0593 1.3200e- 0.0606 196.2995 • 196.2995 5.4600e. 196.4361 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Iblday lb/day Off-Road 1.0940 • 10.8399 12.2603 0.0189 0.5788 0.5788 • 0.5342 0.5342 i 0.0000 1,804.552• 1,804.552 0.5670 1,818.727 { 3 3 0 Paving 0.1164 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 r 0.0000 { Total 1.2104 10.8399 12.2603 0.0189 ' 0.5788 • 0.5788 ' 0.5342 0.5342 0.0000 1,804.552 1.804.552 0.5670 1,818.727 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving -2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust JPM2sTotal Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 TotalCO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM25 Category Ib/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 _ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______ __ ____ m r r T r T r T Y r r r r• r r T t Vendor • 0.0000 � 0.0000 r 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i _ ____ _ ______ ______ _____ _____ _____ _____ _ 3 r r i r r r r i r r • • Worker o- 0.1018 r 0.0661 r 0.6791 �1.9700e- 0.2236 T1.4300e-T 0.2250Y 0.0593 • 1.3200e- 0.0606 + 196.2995 196,2995 • 5.4600e- 196.4361 003 003 003 j 003 1 Total 0.1018 0.0661 0.6791 1.9700e. 0.2236 1.4300e- 0.2250 0.0593 1.3200e• 0.0606 196.2995 196.2995 5.4600e- 196.4361 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PMI0 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 TotalCO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PMI0 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day 7t.Coating 54.0897 0.0000 r 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 1 1 r r r • r ----------- r r r r • r r r Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 • 2.9700e- • 0.0941 r 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 I 281.4481 • 281.4481 • 0.0193 • 281.9309 003 1 Total 54.3086 1.5268 1.8176 , 2.9700e- ' 1 0.0941 ' 0.0941 r ' 0.0941 ' 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 r 0.0193 ' ' 281.9309 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 I Fugitive I Exhaust PM70 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 -_.___ _.r_�c7o7o` --____Y______ + ______ _______ ______ _ _ 1 Y Y Y Y Y t- Y ,� Y � i Vendor • 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 + � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i Y Y Y Y Y Y 1 r Y , Y Y Y t Worker 0.0611 0.0396 0.4075 1.1800e- 0.1341 8.6000e- 0.1350 0.0356 7.9000e- 0.0364 +y 117.7797 � 117.7797 � 3.2800e- � � 117.8617 003 004 004 003 1 Total 0.0611 ' 0.0396 0.4075 1.1800e- 0.1341 ' 8.6000e- , 0.1350 0.0356 7.9000e. , 0.0364 117.7797 ' 117.7797 , 3.2800e. ' 117.8617 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG I NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MIDPM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day Iblday, Archit.Coating 54.0897 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + Off-Road 0.2189 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281,4481 0.0193 281.9309 003 + + Total •, 54.3086 , 1.5268 ' 1.8176 ' 2.9700e- ' 0.0941 ' 0.0941 , ' 0.0941 ' 0.0941 0.0000 , 281.4481 ' 281.4481 ' 0.0193 , , 281.9309 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Blo-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day Ib/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 ± 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I i _ Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 0.0000 ---.-...-..n_______-___----'_______ -------.r------ _______------__;-------4_------�._______y--.--- --- ____ Worker 0.0611 0.0396 0.4075 1.1800e- 0.1341 ; 8.6000e- 0.1350 0.0356 - 7.9000e- 0.0364 i 117,7797 117.7797 3.2800e- ? 117.8617 003 004 004 I 003 I Total 0.0611 0.0396 0.4075 1.1800e. 0.1341 8.6000e- 1 0.1350 0.0356 7.9000e- 0.0364 117.7797 117.7797 3.2800e- ' 117.8617 003 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 I NBio-Cot Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10. Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.4798 3,5981 6.2328 0.0264 2.1655 0.0192 2.1847 0.5795 0.0180 0.5974 j 2,699.563•2,699.563 0,1340 2,702.914 ! 9 9 7 __________ T______T______T______T______...______ , Unmitigated 0.4798 3.5981 6.2328 0.0264 2.1655 0.0192 2.1847 0.5795 0.0180 0.5974 •2,699.563•2,699.563 0.1340 •2,702.914 9 9 7 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 ...................9................;______________F___________+___________.•__________________------ ________________________ Parkin Lot 0.00 • 0.00 i 0.00 Refri erated Warehouse-No Rail 918.49 • 118.49 i 118.49- - -- 507,821 507,821 --- .....................................i-----"_'----- ------------ - -- ..._..__. _ Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 118.49 118.49 i 118.49 507,821 507,821 Total 236.98 236.98 236.98 1,015,643 1,015,643 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip% Trip Purpose% Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-0 or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 ............9_________ ___8______ ________________---Y---------r---------------------------------------------------- Parkin Lot 16.60 .40 6.90 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 0 0 0 ...................... ..."'--"T-------'_ ___._---•• ----'----r-___.__--r-__-__-----•-----------•-__--_____-__--------___---- Refrigerated Warehouse-No 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 1 41.00 92 5 3 ..........a::................................----------- --------�---------�-------•---(-•••-••-••-•--- -- -- -------' ------- Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No 16.60 8.40 6.90 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3 4.4 Fleet Mix CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS MH Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.553113• 0.036408i 0.180286i 0.116335i 0.016165i 0.005101i 0.018218i 0.063797i 0.001357i 0.001565i 0.005903i 0.000808i 0.000944 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Parkin Lot 0.553113• 0.0364081 0.1802861 0.1163351 0.0161651 0.0051011 0.0182181 0.0637971 0.0013571 0.0015651 0.0059031 0.0008081 0.000944 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I Refrigerated Warehouse-No Rail- 0.553113• 0.0364081 0.1802861 0.1163351 0.0161651 0.0051011 0.0182181 0.0637971 0.0013571 0.0015651 0.0059031 0.0008081 0.000944 1 1 1 i I I I 1 1 1 I Unrefdgerated Warehouse-No 0.553113. 0.036408- 0.180286- 0.116335, 0.016165- 0.005101- 0.018218, 0.063797- 0.001357• 0.001565: 0.005903: 0.000808, 0.000944 Rail 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive I Exhaust IPM2.5TOtal Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM25 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas 0.0826 0.7509 0.6308 4.5100e- 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 i 901.0800 901.0800 0.0173 0.0165 906A347 Mitigated 003 + _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ NaturalGas M 0.0826 T 0.7509 T 0.6308 T4.5100e-T T 0.0571 T 0.0571 T 0.0571 0.0571 901.0800T 901.0800T 0.0173 0.0165 ?906.4347 Unmitigated 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 Ci 4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Other Non- 0 +: 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces ; �; __-------__ __ + _____w______r______r______4_______.r______w--------------- ______ _____ _ ._-_ ______ ______ ______ --------------- 0__ _ Parking Lot + 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 r 0.0000 T 0.0000 1 0.0000 r 0.0000 Y 0.0000 T 0.0000 ? 0.0000 b Refrigerated •, T______7------T------T------7------T------ 1 ------T- .0549 1 _____- T----__T_____-T------T___ 4 7370.13 0.0795 i 0.7226 r 0.6070 r 4.3400e- i i 0.0549 i 0.0549 i r 0.0549 r 0.0549 � 867.0738 i 867.0738 r 0.0166 r 0.0159 r 872.2264 Warehouse-No 003 1 1 r 1 1 I 1 Rail I------- ------t------t•------t-----t------t-------t------t-----t------i--------�-------�------t-----t------t------t------- Unrefngerated 289.053 •• 3.1200e- i 0.Z r 0.0238 r 1.7000e- i r 2.1500e- i 2.1500e- i r 2.1500e- i 2.1500e- 34.0062 i 34.0062 r 6.5000e- r 6.2000e- r 34.2083 Warehouse-No ; 003 004 I 003 i 003 003 003 i 004 004 Rail 1 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 r Total 0.0826 0.7509 0.6308 4.5100e- 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 901.0800 901.0800 0.0173 0.0165 906.4347 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive I Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e a Use PM70 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day lb/clay Other Non- 0 1; 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Asphalt Surfaces M r r w �- r r �- •• Y r T -� i t Parking Lot o 0.0000 o.0000 0.0000 . . 0.0000 • 0.0000 • 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � t T--7226 -----T--4GOe- i ------T------T------T------T------T.005 9 T-- .0738 1 -0166 - .0w9 I . ;.2264 Refrigerated 7.37013 0.0795 i 0.7226 0.6070 1 4.3400e- 1 0.0549 1 0.0549 1 1 0.0549 1 0.0549 • 867.0738 1 867.0738 i 0.0166 t 0.0159 i 872.2264 Warehouse-No ' t t 003 i 1 1 1 t 1 1 r 1 1 i r i Rail .; i _..•••••--1-------µ------t------t------t-----t------t-----t------t------t------i--------r_.._---k•------•t-----t-----t------t---•--- Unrefrigerated •0.289053• 3.1200e- i 0.0283 r 0.EN 1 1.7000e- 1 r 2.1500e- r 2.1500e- 1 1 2.i500e- 1 2.i500e- 34.0062 1 34.0062 1 6.S000e- 6.2000e- i 34.2083 Warehouse-No ; 003 :1 1 1 004 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 r 1 I I 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rail 1 1 r 1 i 1 r 1 r t 1 1 1 Total 0.0826 0.7509 0.6308 4.5100e. 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 0.0571 901.0800 901.0800 0.0173 0.0165 906.4347 003 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fughive Exhaust PM10 I Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bic-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 2.3395 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 7.0000e. 7.0000e- 7.000Oe- 7.0000e- + 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 i 004 Unmitigated 2.3395 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 7.0000e- 7.0000a- 7.000Oe- 7.0000e- 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 004 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PMIO Fugitive I Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO28 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory Ib/day lb/day Architectural 0.2667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating I J + •1 T l l T- T r r r T Y , Y T---------------------- Consumer •• 2.0709 • • 0.0000 0.0000 • • 0.0000 . 0.0000 0.0000 r • 0-0000 Products + , n T• T 1 r T- r T' 1 T Y r Landscaping •• 1.8400e- • 1.8000e- • 0.0198 • 0.0000 • 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- + 0.0423 r 0.0423 r1.1000e- • T 0.0451 003 004 005 005 005 005 j 004 + Total 2.3395 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 • 7.0000e- 7.000Oe- 7.0000e- • 7.000Oe- 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- 0.0451 004 OOs oos 005 Dos 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMOd.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project-San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust I PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5Total Bio-CO2 NBio-0O2 TotaICO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM70 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 SubCategory lb/day Iti/day Architectural 0.2667 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 Coating 3a _ ., , _ _r ______, ______- ___ _r ______� ______r ______i ______ _______ _ ______4 i , , • •1� T�� T r r �� T T T T • • ••••�r � ----------------------------- Consumer 2.0709 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products 1 .... ...._ .r______r______r______ _______r------w______r______ -------r------r----------------------Y______r______ _______t------- Landscaping 1.8400e- 1.8000e- 0.0198 0.0000 r 7.00OOe- 7.00OOe- 7.00OOe- 7.00OOe- i 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- 0.0451 003 004 005 005 005 005 004 Total 2.3395 1.8000e. 0.0198 0.0000 7.00OOe- 7.00OOe. 7.0000e- 7.0000e- 0.0423 0.0423 1.1000e- 0.0451 004 005 005 005 005 004 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Off road Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 28 Date: 2/7/2020 4:54 PM Xebec Warehouse Project- San Bernardino-South Coast County, Winter Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation SWAPETechnical 6onsultatfon,Data Analysis and Lftation Support for the Environment 1640 5th St..,Suite 204 Santa Santa Monica,California 90401 Tel: (949)887-9013 Email:mhagemann@swape.com Matthew F.Hagemann,P.G.,C.Hg.,QSD,QSP Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization Industrial Stormwater Compliance Investigation and Remediation Strategies Litigation Support and Testifying Expert CEQA Review Education: M.S.Degree,Geology,California State University Los Angeles,Los Angeles, CA, 1984. B.A.Degree,Geology,Humboldt State University,Arcata,CA, 1982. Professional Certifications: California Professional Geologist California Certified Hydrogeologist Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner Professional Experience: Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations,groundwater fundamentals,and sampling techniques. Positions Matt has held include: • Founding Partner,Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise(SWAPE) (2003-present); • Geology Instructor,Golden West College,2010-2014; • Senior Environmental Analyst,Komex H2O Science,Inc. (2000--2003); • Executive Director,Orange Coast Watch(2001-2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist,U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(1989- 1998); • Hydrogeologist,National Park Service,Water Resources Division(1998-2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member,San Francisco State University,Department of Geosciences(1993- 1998); • Instructor,College of Marin,Department of Science(1990-1995); • Geologist,U.S.Forest Service(1986-1998);and • Geologist,Dames&Moore(1984-1986). Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst: With SWAPE,Matt's responsibilities have included: • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste,water resources, water quality,air quality,Valley Fever,greenhouse gas emissions,and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever. • Stormwater analysis,sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells. • Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California. • Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant. With Komex H2O Science Inc.,Matt's duties included the following: • Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S.EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive,electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research,and regulation. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive,electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research,and regulation. • Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment,results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York. 2 • Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production-related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi-volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators. Executive Director: As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater.Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council. HydrogeologK As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield,and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows: • Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment,soil, and groundwater. • Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases. • Identified emerging issues,wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S.EPA workgroups,including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum. At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui. As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following: • Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water. • Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act.He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings,and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation. 4 • Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities,mine reclamation,and water transfer. Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows: • Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements. • Reviewed and wrote"part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S. EPA legal counsel. • Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites. With the National Park Service, Matt directed service-wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality,including the following tasks: • Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA,RCRA, NEPA,NRDA,and the Clean Water Act to control military,mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed-scale investigations of contaminants at parks,including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park. • Identified high-levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup. • Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup. • Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles,these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi-Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan. Policy: Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,Region 9.Activities included the following: • Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies. • Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication,Oxygenates in Water:Critical Information and Research Needs. • Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy-making process. • Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 GeOloev: With the U.S.Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range.Specific activities were as follows: • Mapped geology in the field,and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability. • Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection. • Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon. As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following: • Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests. • Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal. Teaching: From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels: • At San Francisco State University,held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology,oceanography(lab and lecture),hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination. • Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin. Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach,California from 2010 to 2014. Invited Testimony,Reports. Papers and Presentations: Hagemann,M.F.,2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene,Oregon. Hagemann,M.F.,2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S. EPA Region 9,San Francisco,California. Hagemann,M.F.,2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation,Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005,Denver,Coloradao. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV(served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann,M.F.,2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California,Los Angeles. 6 Brown,A.,Farrow,J.,Gray,A.and Hagemann,M.,2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix,AZ(served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences,Irvine,CA. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting,Pechanga,CA. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker,AZ. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter-Tribal Meeting,Torres Martinez Tribe. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant. Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Hagemann,M.F.,2003. Perchlorate:A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. From Tank to Tap:A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann,M.F.,2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S.EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report. 7 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage.Water Resources Division, National Park Service,Technical Report. VanMouwerik M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999 Water QualityConcerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage.Water Resources Division, National Park Service,Technical Report. Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting,Asheville, North Carolina. Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station,Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons,Salt Lake City. Hagemann,M.F.,Fukunaga,G.L., 1996,The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii.Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting,Maui, October 1996. Hagemann,M.F.,Fukanaga,G.L., 1996,Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61. Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings,California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F. and Sabot, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater.California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 8 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention...Proceedings,Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting,v.35. Other Experience: Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009- 2011. 9 Technical Consultation,Data Analysis and SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE SWAPSy 2656 29th Street,Suite 201 Litigation Support for the Environment Santa Monica Califomia 90405 Attn:Paul Rosenfeld,Ph.D. Mobil:(310)795-2335 Office:(310)452-5555 Fax:(310)452.5550 Email:pmsenfeldr:swape.com Pau! Rosenf ld, Ph.A Chemical Fate and Transport& Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment& Remediation Specialist Education: Ph.D. Soil Chemistry,University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on VOC filtration. M.S.Environmental Science,U.C. Berkeley, 1995.Thesis on organic waste economics. B.A. Environmental Studies,U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment. Professional Experience: Dr.Rosenfeld is the Co-Founder and Principal Environmental Chemist at Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE). His focus is the fate and transport of environmental contaminants,risk assessment,and ecological restoration. Dr.Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling,oil spills,boilers, incinerators and other industrial and agricultural sources relating to nuisance and personal injury. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources as they relate to human and ecological health. Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing petroleum,chlorinated solvents,pesticides,radioactive waste,PCBs, PAHs,dioxins, furans,volatile organics,semi-volatile organics,Perchlorate,heavy metals,asbestos,PFOA,unusual polymers,MtBE,fuel oxygenates and odor. Dr.Rosenfeld has evaluated greenhouse gas emissions using various modeling programs recommended by Califomia Air Quality Management Districts. Professional History: Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise(SWAPE);2003 to present;Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health;2007 to 2011;Lecturer(Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health;2003 to 2006;Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program;2002-2004;Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment,2001-2002;Research Associate Komex H2O Science,2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association,2002-2004;Lecturer San Diego State University, 1999-2001;Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego,2000-2001;Remediation Project Manager Ogden(now Amec),San Diego,2000-2000;Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego,Califomia, 1999—2000;Risk Assessor King County,Seattle, 1996—1999;Scientist James River Corp.,Washington, 1995-96; Scientist Big Creek Lumber,Davenport,California, 1995;Scientist Plumas Corp.,Califomia and USFS,Tahoe 1993-1995;Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund,St. Kitts,West Indies, 1991-1993;Scientist Bureau of Land Management,Kremmling Colorado 1990;Scientist October 2015 I Rosenfeld CV Publications: Chen,J.A.,Zapata,A R.,Sutherland,A.J.,Molmen,D.R,.Chow,B. S.,Wu,L. E.,Rosenfeld,P. E.,Hesse,R. C., (2012)Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science,8(6),622-632. Rosenfeld,P.E.&Feng,L.(2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam:Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemicallndusny,Amsterdam:Elsevier Publishing. Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125. Feng, L.,Wu,C., Tam, L., Sutherland,A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health.73(6),34-46. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam:Elsevier Publishing. Wu, C.,Tam, L., Clark, J.,Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123(17),319-327. Tam L. K..,Wu C.D.,Clark J. J.and Rosenfeld,P.E.(2008).A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70,002252-002255. Tam L. K.., Wu C. D.,Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E.(2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530. Hensley,A.R.A. Scott,J.J.J. Clark,Rosenfeld, P.E.(2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197. Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science& Technology 55(5),345-357. Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science& Technology 55(5),335-344. Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing, Rosenfeld P.E.,and Suffet,I.H.(Mel)(2007). Anatomy of an Odor Wheel. Water Science and Technology. Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, J.J.J., Hensley A.R., Suffer, I.H. (Mel) (2007). The use of an odor wheel classification for evaluation of human health risk criteria for compost facilities. Water Science And Technology. October 2015 2 Rosenfeld CV Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology.49(9),171-178. Rosenfeld P. E.,J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans,October 2-6,2004. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology.49(9), 193-199. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology,49(9), 171-178. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows,Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4),310-315. Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility.Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office,Publications Clearinghouse(MS-6),Sacramento,CA Publication#442-02-008. Rosenfeld,P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191. Rosenfeld,P.E.,and Henry C.L.,(2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application.Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4),363-367. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research,73,388-393. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor. Water Environment Research. 131(14),247-262. Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State. Rosenfeld,P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail.Heritage Magazine of St.Kitts,3(2). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network,7(I). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil.Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County,California. Rosenfeld,P. E.(1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester&Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis.University of California. October 2015 3 Rosenfeld CV Presentations: Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara,CA. Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston,MA. Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston,MA. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams(AFFF) at Airports in the United States.2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon,AZ. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States"Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams(AFFF)at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon,AZ. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds.,Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution.Lecture conducted from Tallinn,Estonia. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts,Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant The 23 d Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld,P. E.(October 15-18,2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23'd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts,Amherst MA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane(TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences(AEHS)Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego,CA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego,CA. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 —25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants — DIOMN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway. October 2015 4 Rosenfeld CV Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia,PA. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel,Irvine California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine,California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D.(September 26-27,2005). Fate,Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel,Marina Del Ray,California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel,Virginia Beach,Virginia. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor,Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor,Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology,A National Problem and Unquantified Liability.National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel,Chicago Illinois. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust. Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona. Hagemann,M.F., Paul Rosenfeld,Ph.D.and Rob Hesse(2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Meeting oftribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker,AZ. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners. Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel,Sacramento, California. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando,FL, Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties,Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane.National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum.Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel,Anaheim California. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable.Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. October 2015 5 Rosenfeld CV Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association.Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration. Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington.. Rosenfeld,P.E.and Grey,M.A.(November 11-14,2002).Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility.Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis,Maryland. Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores,California. Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld,P.E.,and C.L.Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction.Soil Science Society ofAmerica.Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil.Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan,Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. October 2015 6 Rosenfeld CV Teachine Experience: UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants. National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks. National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites. California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego,Ventura,and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design. UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation. University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments,and Soil Stability. U.C. Berkeley,Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10. Academic Grants Awarded: California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment. Goal:To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost.2001. Synagro Technologies,Corona California:$10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University. Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils.2000. King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998. Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997. James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996. United State Forest Service,Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995. Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993. October 2015 7 Rosenfeld CV Deaosition and/or Trial Testimony: In The Superior Court of the State of California,County of Alameda Charles Spain.,Plaintiff vs.Thermo Fisher Scientific,et al.,Defendants Case No.:RG 14711115 Rosenfeld Deposition, September,2015 In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County Russell D. Winburn,et al.,Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen,et al.,Defendants Case No.:LALA002187 Rosenfeld Deposition,August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Jerry Dovico,et al.,Plaintiffs vs.Valley View Sine LLC,et al.,Defendants Law No,: LALA 105144-Division A Rosenfeld Deposition,August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Doug Pauls,et al.,,et al.,Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren,et al.,Defendants Law No,: LALA 105144-Division A Rosenfeld Deposition,August 2015 In The Circuit Court of Ohio County,West Virginia Robert Andrews,et al.v.Antero,et al. Civil Action NO. 14-C-30000 Rosenfeld Deposition,June 2015 In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana,New Mexico Betty Gonzalez,et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy,Del Oro Real Estate LLC,Jerry Settles and Deward DeRu ter.Defendants Y Rosenfeld Deposition:July 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation,Defendant Case No 4980 Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015 In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County,Florida Walter Hinton,et. al.Plaintiff,vs.City of Fort Lauderdale,Florida,a Municipality,Defendant. Case Number CACE07030358(26) Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014 In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty,et al.,Plaintiffs,v. Oklahoma City Landfill,LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill,et al. Defendants. Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C Rosenfeld Deposition:July 2014 In the County Court of Dallas County Texas Lisa Parr et al,Plaintiff,vs.Aruba et al,Defendant. Case Number cc-11-0 1 650-E Rosenfeld Deposition:March and September 2013 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio October 2015 8 Rosenfeld CV John Michael Abicht,et al.,Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services,Inc.,et al.,Defendants Case Number:2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons.w/2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition:October 2012 In the Court of Common Pleas for the Second Judicial Circuit,State of South Carolina,County of Aiken David Anderson,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Norfolk Southern Corporation,et al.,Defendants. Case Number: 2007-CP-02-1584 In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama Jaeanette Moss Anthony,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs. Drummond Company Inc.,et al.,Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076 Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010 In the Ninth Judicial District Court,Parish of Rapides,State of Louisiana Roger Price,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs. Roy O. Martin,L.P.,et al.,Defendants. Civil Suit Number 224,041 Division G Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008 In the United States District Court,Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al.,Plaintiffs,vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation,et al.,Defendants. Case Number 2:07CV 1052 Rosenfeld Deposition:July 2009 In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Carolyn Baker,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Chevron Oil Company,et al.,Defendants. Case Number 1:05 CV 227 Rosenfeld Deposition:July 2008 In the Fourth Judicial District Court,Parish of Calcasieu,State of Louisiana Craig Steven Arabie,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Citgo Petroleum Corporation,et al.,Defendants. Case Number 07-2738 G In the Fourteenth Judicial District Court,Parish of Calcasieu,State of Louisiana Leon B.Brydels,Plaintiffs,vs.Conoco, Inc.,et al., Defendants. Case Number 2004-6941 Division A In the District Court of Tarrant County,Texas, 153rd Judicial District Linda Faust,Plaintiff,vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company,Witco Chemical Corporation A/K/A Witco Corporation,Solvents and Chemicals,Inc.and Koppers Industries,Inc.,Defendants. Case Number 153-212928-05 Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2006,October 2007 Rosenfeld Trial:January 2008 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino Leroy Allen,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Nutro Products,Inc.,a California Corporation and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,Defendants. John Loney,Plaintiff,vs.James H. Didion, Sr.;Nutro Products,Inc.;DOES 1 through 20,inclusive, Defendants. Case Number VCV V SO44671 Rosenfeld Deposition:December 2009 Rosenfeld Trial:March 2010 In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama,Northern Division James K. Benefield,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs. International Paper Company,Defendant. Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM Rosenfeld Deposition:July 2010,June 2011 October 2015 9 Rosenfeld CV i In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles Leslie Hensley and Rick Hensley,Plaintiffs,vs.Peter T.Hoss,as trustee on behalf of the Cone Fee Trust; Plains Exploration&Production Company,a Delaware corporation;Rayne Water Conditioning, Inc.,a California Corporation;and DOES 1 through 100,Defendants. Case Number SC094173 Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008,October 2008 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria Branch Clifford and Shirley Adelhelm,et al.,all individually,Plaintiffs,vs.Unocal Corporation,a Delaware Corporation;Union Oil Company of California,a California corporation;Chevron Corporation,a California corporation;ConocoPhillips,a Texas corporation; Kerr-McGee Corporation,an Oklahoma corporation;and DOES 1 though 100,Defendants. Case Number 1229251 (Consolidated with case number 1231299) Rosenfeld Deposition:January 2008 In the United States District Court for Eastern District of Arkansas,Eastern District of Arkansas Harry Stephens Farms,Inc,and Harry Stephens, individual and as managing partner of Stephens Partnership,Plaintiffs,vs. Helena Chemical Company,and Exxon Mobil Corp.,successor to Mobil Chemical Co.,Defendants. Case Number 2:06-CV-00166 JMM(Consolidated with case number 4:07CV00278 JMM) Rosenfeld Deposition:July 2010 In the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas,Texarkana Division Rhonda Brasel,et al.,Plaintiffs,vs.Weyerhaeuser Company and DOES 1 through 100,Defendants. Civil Action Number 074037 Rosenfeld Deposition: March 2010 Rosenfeld Trial: October 2010 In the District Court of Texas 2 1"Judicial District of Burleson County Dennis Davis,Plaintiff,vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company,Defendant. Case Number 25,151 Rosenfeld Trial:May 2009 In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon,Eugene Donovan,Genaro Ramirez,Carol Sassler,and Harvey Walton,each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated,Plaintiffs, vs.BP Products North America,Inc.,Defendant. Case 3:1 0-cv-00622 Rosenfeld Deposition:February 2012 Rosenfeld Trial:April 2013 In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland Philip E. Cvach, 11 et al.,Plaintiffs vs.Two Farms,Inc.d/b/a Royal Farms,Defendants Case Number:03-C-12-012487 OT Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013 October 2015 10 Rosenfeld CV ' I I February 9, 2020 We, the following neighbors and owners of properties on Camino Predera wish to commend the Planning Staff and Commissioners for their support. Progress was made at the recent workshop on January 30th and we appreciate the opportunity for the additional time that it provided. On Wednesday, February 12, 2020, the Planning Staff will be recommending the Planning Commission approve a continuance of the public hearing. We support City staffs recommendation. Signatures of agreement: ur3� � �- SOT 3E LOT 17 &a'k"/Pl o"r 3-1 [�L SOT 17 ✓�'� LOt Lor 30 r z /0 1-6r ! 4 LOr�I L07 Zo Lvr� I� 2,CC1T 36 February 9, 2020 We,the following neighbors and owners of properties on Camino Predera wish to commend the Planning Staff and Commissioners for their support. Progress was made at the recent workshop on January 30th and we appreciate the opportunity for the additional time that it provided. On Wednesday, February 12, 2020, the Planning Staff will be recommending the Planning Commission approve a continuance of the public hearing. We support City staffs recommendation. Signatures of agreem LOT l3 L 0 T 10�3 Z 2 Zo L .� CITY OF • CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 12, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Michael Smith, Principle Planner; David F. Eoff IV, Senior Planner SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2020-00004 — CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA — A request to amend Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to modify the development standards applicable to, for example, building height, setbacks, and architecture that will apply to single-family residential development within a specific area of the Red Hill community that is generally located north of Foothill Boulevard, south of Base Line Road, west of Vineyard Avenue, and east of Grove Avenue (the City's west boundary). This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15061(b)(3). This item will be forwarded to City Council for final action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission continue Municipal Code Amendment DRC2020- 00004 to a future unspecified public hearing date. PROJECT REVIEW AND BACKGROUND: At the January 22, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, a request to modify the development standards for single-family residential development in the Red Hill Community was presented to the Planning Commission for consideration. The modification is applicable specifically to Tract 10035, which includes 38 lots along Camino Predera within the Red Hill community. At the meeting the Planning Commission received the staff report and presentation from staff, as well as public comment from residents and property owners on Camino Predera. Staff outlined the history and long-time concerns of development in the Red Hill community, provided background information on two neighborhood workshops that were conducted, and presented the new development standards that would be applicable to development along Camino Predera. Following the staff presentation and public comment, the Planning Commission continued the item with a 5-0 vote to the February 12, 2020 meeting amid concerns from the public and uncertainty with the development standards. Staff was also directed to hold a third workshop for the residents and property owners along Camino Predera prior to the February 12, 2020 meeting. The third workshop was held on January 30, 2020 in the Tri-Communities Room at City Hall. Only the residents and property owners along Camino Predera were invited, as recommended by the Planning Commission. During the third workshop, the residents and property owners were given 880 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MCA MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC2020-00004— CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA February 12, 2020 Page 2 an opportunity to discuss their concerns and the proposed changes amongst themselves without staff present in the room. The workshop lasted for nearly 2 and a half hours.The group was able to agree on some aspects, however there was still an apparent disagreement amongst them on the more significant changes related to setbacks, height, and others. Despite the disagreement, the community felt the 3re workshop was beneficial, and progress was being made. With that in mind, one notable request from the residents was to continue the public hearing to allow additional time for the residents and property owners to discuss the changes amongst themselves and with City staff. Staff understands that time is of the essence with this proposed Municipal Code Amendment. However, staff believes additional time may allow the community to come to an agreement on potential development standards that will be in the best interest of Camino Predera. Therefore, staff is requesting a continuance of the public hearing to a date unspecific to allow further analysis and discussion of the changes. 881 TITION EXHIBIT TRACT 10035 26 . Y, i Petition Summary: x Voted Yes. 21 2 24 2011 Preferred to be a neutral party: 3 8 Total # of lots in Tract 10035: 38 .18 Total # of YES or NO voters: 35 29 T i 32 31 1616 32 . 33.- 14. _ 34' 3 ,s - Rancho Cucamonga City Council Mission Statement u �} �p�ota'6 a` 1 a Make decisions, and be perceived as making decisions,for the general welfare of the community. 38 37: 36, 1 � . Always work to improve existing services and develop policies to meet the expected as well as anticipated neec of the community. 130 • Work together cooperatively to respect all persons and their ideas in order to develop and maintain the trust of tr 1 y community. Y - 9 a Reflect the community's desires and priorities by assuring that decisions accurately reflect the community's 8 . interests by fairly translating public feedback into public policy. 2 Y Enhance the quality of life of all Rancho Cucamonga residents through the continued pursuit of excellence and Ny commitment to the City's core values and goals. 3 • Set the vision for the community for the future. 4 5 a Have a professional, objective and respectful relationship with each other in order to more effectively address thi challenges of the future. TOP OF CURB BUILDING HEIGHT EXH Tract 10035 Red Hill Rancho Cucamonga TRACT 10035 TOC Building LOT# Address Height 1 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH 2 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH 3 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH 4 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH 5 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH 6 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH 7 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH "\ $ IVACANT LOT ON SOUTH 2e ; 25 23 4 n 26 - =�=2�; 21 21 9 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH 1\ 2-5 2e ` ,' ,p, 10 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH ° '' .4 20 - 11 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH /r PI -8 ° rOF''F\,^ /' "°a �1 � \ 12 $045 CAMINO PREDERA 14.0 FT 0.; =P S11i ,�.' \ �' 13 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH 29 °e 14 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH 311 O /' °`\� 7 \ 15 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH °r ,, 5\3 1 �� '/ °' 1 6 \ 16 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH \32 °' 1.5 \; 17 7997 CAMIN PREDERA 22.0 FT / \ \ ,s ' 18 VACANT LOT ON SOUTH �' Pl I 0 #e °� 3 \ 19 7979 GAMIN PREDERA 29.5 FT 20 7967 CAMINO PREDERA 30.5 FT �s \12 \ o se 3� 36 , t��o��*644 a\ 12 21 7957 CAMINO PREDERA 28.2 FT 3 22 7966 CAMINO PREDERA 51.5 FT a , 8 3 r i 23 7978 CAMINO PREDERA 46.5 FT 9 ; 24 8736 PREDERA CT 27.0 FT 25 8728 PREDERA CT 30.0 FT 2 - 26 8720 PREDERA CT 37.4 FT 2 3 = V 6 \ 27 8714 PREDERA CT 37.0 FT 4 } S 28 8715 PREDERA CT 42.0 FT 1. 29 8721 PREDERA CT 36.0 FT 30 8725 CAMINO PREDERA 34.5 FT 31 8034 CAMINO PREDERA 43.5 FT 32 18044 CAMINO PREDERA 45.5 FT 33 8054 CAMINO PREDERA 49.5 FT 34 8062 CAMINO PREDERA 55.0 FT 35 VACANT LOT ON NORTH 36 8072 CAMINO PREDERA 33.1 FT 37 18080 CAMINO PREDERA 30.0 FT 5 &10 SIDE SETBACKS 10 AND 15 SIDE SETBACKS 5- 110 15 1 SIDE SIDE SIDE i SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK It% EXHIBIT A- 14" FROM TOP OF CURB +1 4- - - ------- -- . -,5:5"12 5:12 4 +21-6" 4:12 4:12 +31-211 +4'-10' —----- ',3:12 I i 3:12 4: - l r 11 { F I i 1 i +71-1" CITY STAFF PROPOSAL ON 1/22/2020 SPECIAL TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON CAMINO PREDERA TECHNICAL STANDARD MAXIMUM MINIMUM NOTES BUILDING HEIGHT Measured vertical m the of curb at the street In front of the midp oint of the front property line I SOUTH SIDE OF CAMINO PREDERA 14 FEET 6 FEET of the subject tat,to highest point on the roof (or other feature such asadedQ NORTH SIDE OF CAMINO PREDERA 25FEET N/A Measured vertically from the finished grade surface of the lot to the highest point an the roof or other feature such as a dock LEGENDBUILDING SETBACKS 37 FEET Measured from the face of curb at the street to the closest building wall plane on the front elevation FRONT NONE (+/-5 FEPn Measured from the face of curb at the street to the closest building wall plane on the front elevation REAR NONE 20FEET Measured from the rear property line to the closest building wall plane on the rear elevation Roof Pitch SIDE NONE 10/15 FEET Measured between the side property lines and the building wall plans an the side elevations Measured from the closest building wall plane of any structure to the closest bulding BUILDING SEPERATION NONE 20FEET wall plane an an adjacent tat3:12 EXCAVATION 8 FEET N/A Measured from the existing grade of the lot (Planning Commission review Is not required)4:12 WALL HEIGHT rt 5:12 SCREEN (FREE STANDING) 6 FEET NONE Measured from finished grade;maximum height within the front setback is 3 feet Measured from finished grade (a Minor Exception Is not required) ;maximum height for new fill Is RETAINING (EXPOSEDNISIBLE PORTION 8 FEET NONE 4 feet PROPERTY LINE SPECIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON CAMINO PREDERA DESIGN/ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT STANDARD 7= SETBACK ROOF LINE ORIENTATION The horizontal ridgellne(s) of the roof on any structure) shall be aligned perpendicular to the street Where this Is not possible,the maximum length of any horizontal ridgeline the Is parallel to the street shall be limited to 20 feet in length. ROOF DESIGN Flat rod designs are permitted CARA Ga2R9 doors on the front (;t—r;egt-facIn-V elevation) of a proposed house shall be restricted to one 2-car garage door or two 1-car e doors, * ALL MEASUREMENT U= #mg, - --- -AGE DIMENSIONS Garages oors on the Font elevation (steet-Tadrigel eve toro shaN have a max Tmum—V=A ZU?go nterior aimenstom ARE WITH A 5:12 PITCH Tandem parking spaces are permitted 96RAGE PL071NG The front elevation (street-facing side) of the gare shall be a minimum of 5 feet behind the arims g building elevation,with a 311-foot setback GARAGE LAYOUT Tandem parking spaces are permitted 14' EXIBIT FROM TOP OF CURB (SOUTH SIDE OF CAMINO PREDERN 5 &10 SIDE SETBACKS 10 AND 15 SIDE SETBACKS SIDE SIDE SIDE SETBACK SET PACK SETBACK EXHIBIT B- 20' FROM TOP OF CURBS R 461-511 I l 5'12 +8,-6„ ,+6'-5" 4'12 4.12 +10'-10" 491-211 Ir�r '3:12 3:12 +13'-2" THER TECHINAL DETAILS:HERE SHALL BE NO M BUILDING HEIGHT,THE UILQ NG HEIGHT WILL EI MUM SET BY THE OP OF CURB HEIGHT DEVELOPERS PROPOSAL 2/3/2020 *ITEMS DIFFERENT FROM CITY PROPOSAL HERE SHALL BE NO BUILDING ENEVELOPE TO FOLLOW OR THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY SINCE A MAXIMUM TOP OF URB S BEING IMPOSED CHPROPERTYOWNER HAS THE RIGHT TO REMOVE SPECIAL TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON CAMINO PREDERA ANY TREE ON THEIR PROPERTY WITH A NO FEE PERMIT. HE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY TREE REMOVAL HE CITY SHALL A VIEW FENCE ONOU H SIDE OF CAM NIO PREDERA ALONG T ELONG PACIFICE TECHNICAL STANDARD MAXIMUM MINIMUM NOTES LECTRIC TRAIL.THE FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED N THE PROPERTY LINE ALONG THE TRAIL AND THE BUILDING HEIGHT OUTH SIDE PROPERTY LINE OF THE LOTS ADJACENT O THE TRAIL. EACH LOT OWNER WILL BE ALLED TO SOUTH SIDE OF CAMINO PREDERA * 20 FEET * NIA Measured vertically from the top of curb at the street.In front of the midpoint of the front property line ULL A NO FEE GATE PERMIT TO MODIFY THE OPENING of the subject lot,to the highest point on the roof (or other feature such as a dock) RIVEWAY SLOPE CAN EXCEED 20% NORTH SIDE OF CAMINO PREDERA * 35 FEET NIA Measured vertically from the finished grade surface of the lotto the highest point on the roof or other feature such as a deck LEGENDBUILDING SETBACKS Measured from the face of curb at the street to the closest building wall plane on the front elevation FRONT NONE +FEETMeasured from the face of curb at the street to the closest building wall plane on the front elevation REAR NONE 20 FEET Measured from the rear property line to the closest building wall plane on the rear elevation Roof Pitch SIDE NONE * 5/10 FEET Measured between the side property lines and the building wall plane on the side elevations Measured from the closest building wall plane of any structure to the closest bulding BUILDING SEPERATION NONE * 10 FEET - r�.12 wall plane on an adjacent lot J EXCAVATION 8 FEET NIA Measured from the existing grade of the lot (Planning Commission review is not required) 4:12 WALL HEIGHT 5:12 SCREEN (FREE STANDING) 6 FEET NONE Measured from finished grade;maximum height within the front setback is 3 feet RETAINING (EXPOSEDNISIBLE PORTIO $ FEET NONE Measured from finished grade (a Minor Exception is not required) ;maximum height for new fill is 4 feet R PROPERTY LINE SPECIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON CAMINO PREDERA DESIGN/ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT STANDARD ROOF SETBACK ROOF LINE ORIENTATION The horizontal ridgeiine(s) of the roof (on any structure) shall be aligned perpendicular to the street. Where this is not possible,the maximum length of any horizontal ddgeline that is parallel to the street shall be limited to 20 feet in length. ROOF DESIGN Flat roof designs are permitted * ALL MEASUREMENT NIA ARE WITH A 5:12 PITCH GARAGE DIMENSIONS NIA PLOTTINGGARAGE The front elevation (street-facing side) of the gaMe shall be a minimum of 5 feet behind the primary building elevation,with a 30-foot setback GARAGE LAYOUT Tandem parking spaces are permitted 25' EXIBIT FROM TOP OF CURB (SOUTH SIDE OF CAMINO PREDERA) 5 &10 SIDE SETBACKS 10 AND 15 SIDE SETBACKS 516E SIDE SIDE SETBACK SETBACK SETBACK EXHIBIT C- 10 FROM TOP OF CURB Alt 5:12 5:12 ' 4:12 4:12 , ---- -------------- w '-10" +10" '3:12 3:12 +3'-1" ' THER TECHINAL DETAILS: HERE SHALL BE NO MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT,THE UILDING HEIGHT WILL BE SET BY THE TOP OF CURB HEIGHT CHUCK BUQU ET PROPOSAL 2I3I2020 * ITEMS DIFFERENT FROM CITY PROPOSAL HERE SHALL BE NO BUILDING ENEVELOPE TO FOLLOW OR THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY SINCE A MAXIMUM TOP OF URB HEIGHT IS BEING IMPOSED CH PROPERTY OWNER HAS THE RIGHT TO REMOVE SPECIAL TECHNICAL STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON CAMINO PREDERA ANY TREE ON THEIR PROPERTY WITH A NO FEE PERMIT. HE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY TREE REMOVAL rHE CITY PROVIDE A VIEW FENCE ONTH OU H SIDE OLF CAMINO PREDERA ALONG THELONG IPACI CE TECHNICAL STANDARD MAXIMUM MINIMUM NOTES ELECTRIC TRAIL.THE FENCE SHALL BE LOCATED N THE PROPERTY LINE ALONG THE TRAIL AND THE BUILDING HEIGHT OUTH SIDE PROPERTY LINE OF THE LOTS ADJACENT y 0 THE TRAIL. EACH LOT OWNER WILL BE ALLED TO SOUTH SIDE OF CAMINO PREDERA * 10 FEET 6 FEET Measured f the subject lot to the highest poi the top of nt onathe roof t the e(or lothDer feature suc 'as a deck)front property Line ULL A NO FEE GATE PERMIT TO MODIFY THE OPENING RIVEWAY SLOPE CAN EXCEED 20% NORTH SIDE OF CAMINO PREDERA 25 FEET NIA Measured vertically from the finished grade surface of the lot to the highest point on the roof or other feature such as a deck LEGENDBUILDING SETBACKS 37 FEET Measured from the face of curb at the street to the closest building wall plane on the front elevation FRONT NONE + _ 5 FEET) Measured from the face of curb at the street to the closest building wall plane on the front elevation REAR NONE 20 FEET Measured from the rear property line to the closest building wall plane on the rear elevation Roof Pitch SIDE Measured between the side property NONE 1511 a FEET p pedy lines and the building wall plane on the side elevations BUILDING SEPERATION NONE 10 FEET Measured from the closest building wall plane of any structure to the closest buiding wall plane on an adjacent lot 3:1 2 EXCAVATION 8 FEET NIA Measured from the existing grade of the lot (Planning Commission review Is not required) 4:12 WALL HEIGHT 5:12 SCREEN (FREE STANDING) 6 FEET NONE Measured from finished grade,maximum height within the front setback is 3 feet RETAINING (EXPOSEDIVISIBLE PORTION 8 FEET NONE Measured from finished grade (a Minor Exception Is not required) maximum height for new fill is 4 feet R PROPERTY LINE SPECIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT ON CAMINO PREDERA DESIGN/ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT STANDARD SETBACK ROOF LINE ORIENTATION The horizontal ridgeline (s) of the roof on any structure) shall be aligned perpendicular to the street. Where this is not possible,the maximum length of any horizontal ridgeline that is parallel to the street shall be limited to 20 feet In length. ROOF DESIGN Flat roof designs are permitted * ALL MEASUREMENT NIA ARE WITH A 5:12 PITCH GARAGE DIMENSIONS NIA GARAC& PLOTTING The front elevation (street-facing side) of the garage shall be a minimum of 5 feet behind the primary building elevation,with a 30-foot setback GARAGE LAYOUT Tandem parking spaces are permitted 10' EXIBIT FROM TOP OF CURB (SOUTH SIDE OF CAMINO PREDERA) '�