Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020/02/19 - Agenda PacketAGENDA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD -HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY - SUCCESSOR AGENCY - PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY - CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, February 19, 2020 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 REGULAR MEETINGS: 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS: CLOSED SESSION TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM 4:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS: MAYOR L. Dennis Michael CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison MAYOR PRO TEM Lynne B. Kennedy COUNCIL MEMBERS Ryan A. Hutchison Kristine D. Scott Sam Spagnolo CITY ATTORNEY James L. Markman CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds CITY TREASURER James C. Frost Rancho Cucamonga City Council Mission Statement • Make decisions, and be perceived as making decisions, for the general welfare of the community. • Always work to improve existing services and develop policies to meet the expected as well as anticipated needs of the community. • Work together cooperatively to respect all persons and their ideas in order to develop and maintain the trust of the community. • Reflect the community's desires and priorities by assuring that decisions accurately reflect the community's interests by fairly translating public feedback into public policy. • Enhance the quality of life of all Rancho Cucamonga residents through the continued pursuit of excellence and commitment to the City's core values and goals. • Set the vision for the community for the future. • Have a professional, objective and respectful relationship with each other in order to more effectively address the challenges of the future. Page 1 Aft A_ . INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC Le gA'HO &CAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinanceAuthority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" or on an "Administrative Hearing" Item(s), your name will be alled when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Libraries and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Streaming Video on Demand is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/council/videos.asp. The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please silence all cell phones and devices while the meeting is in session. Page 2 FEBRUARY 19, 2020 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CLOSED SESSION - 4:30 P.M. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - Tapia Conference Room D.1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229 162 14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS — CITY D.2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8810 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229131 07; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES AND JOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 2/3 INTEREST AND BONNIE CATHRYN STRACK & WILLIAM R. RUSHING, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE STRACK FAMILY TRUST, DATED MARCH 13, 2014, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/3 INTEREST, OWNERS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS — CITY D.3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE S E C T I O N 5 4 9 5 6. 8 F O R I N T E R E S T I N PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229 162 14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MR. & MRS. JOAQUIN RAMOS, JOSE NERI, MAURICIO NERI AND JOAQUIN QUIEJ, TENANTS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS — CITY DA. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. CIV DS 1937969 E. RECESS Page 3 CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AGENCIES, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT/ PRESENTATIONS A.1. Presentation of Friends of the Library $140,000 Donation to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. A.2. Presentation of Painting from Bayart Academy for Rancho Cucamonga Fire District's Assistance --- with the Kincade Fire. A.3. Presentation of Cal-ICMA "Overall Excellence in Talent" Award to the Rancho Cucamonga --- Human Resources Department. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Housing Successor Agency/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Housing Successor Agency/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. C. CONSENT CALENDAR — FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT $ C.1. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $1,552,217.17 and Weekly Check Page 4 Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of $1,227,227.79 Dated January 07, 2020 Through February 10, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of December in the Amount of $554,404.88. C.2. Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas 33 Company in the Amount of $6,233.81 Dated January 07, 2020 Through February 10, 2020. C.3. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of December 31, 2019. 35 CA. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 2020. 43 D. CONSENT CALENDAR - HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY E. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY F. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY G. CONSENT CALENDAR - CITY COUNCIL G.1. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $2,356,491.75 and Weekly Check 51 Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of $6,473,800.02 Dated January 07, 2020 Through February 10, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of December in the Amount of $574,944.66. 76 G.2. Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Amount of $44,708.08 Dated January 07, 2020 Through February 10, 2020. G.3. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of December 31, 2019. 78 91 GA. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of January 31, 2020. G.5. Consideration to Approve a Five -Year Agreement with IntelesysOne, Inc. for Telephone System 104 Maintenance and Support. G.6. Consideration to Approve America Walks Grant of $1,500 to Complete a #BeKindRC 124 Sidewalk Art Installation. G.7. Consideration to Approve a Contract with Kaiser Foundation Hospitals in the amount of $25,000 126 for the Your Mind Matters Mobile Unit Project. G.8. Consideration of a Memorandum of Understanding with Los Angeles County on Behalf of the 132 Southern California Regional Energy Network for Energy Services, Audits, and Technical Assistance for City Facilities Serviced By The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU). G.9. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to Tract No. 18936 Located on the South 146 Side of Carnesi Drive and East of Etiwanda Avenue as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. G.10. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Related to a Multi -Family Development by 149 CRP/FPC Foothill Owner, LLC Located on the Northeast Corner of Foothill Blvd and Hermosa Avenue (Case No. DRC2016-00006) as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Securities. G.11. Consideration to Accept Public Street Improvements on 4th Street and 6th Street Improvements 152 Related to the Development of Tract 20073 (Case No. ROW2018-00135 and ROW2018-00137 Respectively) Submitted by SC Rancho Development Corp. as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. G.12. Consideration to Accept the Citywide Concrete Repair FY 2018/2019 Project as Complete, File 155 the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. H. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have been introduced for first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non -controversial. The City Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Council Member. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM Page 5 J. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS - CITY COUNCIL/FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J.1. Public Hearing of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to Consider Fee Adjustments for Various City 159 Departments and Citywide Transportation Development Impact Fees. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 162 ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT FEES RELATING TO TOWING SERVICES, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION 17-037 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, 165 ADOPTING A COST RECOVERY FEE RELATED TO THE ETIWANDA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD AND CONSERVATION PLAN RESOLUTION NO. 2020-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 167 CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FEES FOR SERVICES PERFORMED BY BUILDING AND SAFETY AND PLANNING RESOLUTION NO. 2020-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 171 CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 18-114, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF J.2. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO 188 DENY HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018- 00473 — PAUL BARDOS, APPLICANT. This project consists of a site plan and architectural review of a proposed 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 771 square foot garage and a request to construct retaining walls up to 5 -feet and 2 -inches high on a 15,430 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. A minor exception was also requested to exceed the maximum height limit for retaining walls in the zone. This item was determined to be exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that has been rejected or disapproved. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 293 CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEAL DRC2019-00975 AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2017-00244; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0207-631-03 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-007 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 298 CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEAL DRC2019-00975 AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03 K. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS K.1. Summary of Public Safety Response to 2019 Holiday Lights Display and Recommendations for 302 2020 Holiday Season. K.2. Consideration to Receive and File Midyear Financial Update for the Six Month Period Ended 305 December 31, 2019. K.3. Consideration to Adopt the 2020 Legislative Platform. 312 L. COUNCIL BUSINESS L.1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) Page 6 L.2. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) M. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING N. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy -Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. Page 7 Bayart Academy Painting Presentation A. / "`ti ` ;.. r4&1 `�• •:R_J , f t �` !�1` _.J'P•% - VVI' -fig i Oz i k ilk Tidy 44, 24.11 �AA,, 11•11 ' v i 24.11 �AA,, 11•11 ' v Are You ReadyRC? RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT ReadyRC Academy Courses HOME February Gth from fiprn4prn August 270 from 6pm4pm Learn to prevent the leading cause of threat to lyres and horses. Course will include: fire prevention techniques, fire safety, shutting off utllitles, fire extinguisher use and more. HEALTH February 20th from 6pm-8prn September 241f" from bpm -bpm Learn basic first aid and Hands -Only CRR to help yourself and others. Course will Include medical preparedness Information such as: basic first aid, AEI, treating burns, bandaging, and more. HAZARDS March 120 from Gpm-apm October 29* from 6pm-6prn Learn how to overcome various hazards & how to Increase your personal preparedness and response for each hazard. Course will Include: building an emergency kit, escape plans, disaster preparedness, notlflcations, and more. HELP March 261h 2020 from ipm-span Novo mbar IV' bpm -Spm Learn how to help yourself and others durin and after an emergency until professional hep The ReadyRC Academy is a set of 4 hands -ori courses meant to he taken individually or every In a series. The classes are focused on preparing you for various emergencies & disasters and to teach you a useful skill to add to your preparedness and safety tool belt. Cost: 16 and vo u leave w1th a preparedness tool or item! Register at; www.RCPark.com or at the Central Park 5enlor or Community Center Location: All Risk Training Center 11285 Jersey Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 For Information: Call: (909) 774-3020 Email: EIizabeth.ross@c1tyofrc.us DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE BI -WEEKLY PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,552,217.17 AND WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS (EXCLUDING CHECKS ISSUED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY) IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,227,227.79 DATED JANUARY 07, 2020 THROUGH FEBRUARY 10, 2020 AND ELECTRONIC DEBIT REGISTER FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER IN THE AMOUNT OF $554,404.88. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Fire Board approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 Check Register Attachment 1 Electronic Check Register Page 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010024 01/08/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 14,280.00 0.00 14,280.00 AP 00010025 01/08/2020 EXELON GENERATION CO LLC 228,093.75 0.00 228,093.75 AP 00010026 01/08/2020 GEMINI PROJECTS 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00010027 01/08/2020 GEOGRAPHICS 4,952.73 0.00 4,952.73 AP 00010028 01/08/2020 RCCEA 1,812.50 0.00 1,812.50 AP 00010029 01/08/2020 RCPFA 11,295.27 0.00 11,295.27 AP 00010030 01/08/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 128.00 0.00 128.00 AP 00010031 01/08/2020 U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 8,253.60 0.00 8,253.60 AP 00010035 01/09/2020 BRODART BOOKS 24,288.82 0.00 24,288.82 AP 00010036 01/09/2020 DEMCOINC 99.09 0.00 99.09 AP 00010037 01/09/2020 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 9,689.61 0.00 9,689.61 AP 00010038 01/09/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 681.73 0.00 681.73 AP 00010040 01/09/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 6,510.68 0.00 6,510.68 AP 00010041 01/09/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 155.16 0.00 155.16 AP 00010042 01/09/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 17,010.77 0.00 17,010.77 AP 00010043 01/15/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 22,257.07 0.00 22,257.07 AP 00010044 01/15/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 137,128.45 0.00 137,128.45 AP 00010045 01/15/2020 EDF TRADING NORTH AMERICA LLC 50,050.00 0.00 50,050.00 AP 00010046 01/15/2020 MOFFATT & NICHOL 382,425.62 0.00 382,425.62 AP 00010047 01/15/2020 RCCEA 1,842.75 0.00 1,842.75 AP 00010048 01/15/2020 RCPFA 11,141.30 0.00 11,141.30 AP 00010049 01/15/2020 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00010050 01/15/2020 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 357.69 0.00 357.69 AP 00010051 01/16/2020 ABC LOCKSMITHS 626.58 0.00 626.58 AP 00010052 01/16/2020 AIRGAS USA LLC 302.46 0.00 302.46 AP 00010053 01/16/2020 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 1,574.63 0.00 1,574.63 AP 00010054 01/16/2020 BRODART BOOKS 39,774.53 0.00 39,774.53 AP 00010055 01/16/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 594.92 0.00 594.92 AP 00010056 01/16/2020 CRAFCOINC 1,876.88 0.00 1,876.88 AP 00010057 01/16/2020 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 0.00 925.00 925.00 AP 00010058 01/16/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 139.03 0.00 139.03 AP 00010059 01/16/2020 EMCOR SERVICES 484.00 10,382.00 10,866.00 *** AP 00010060 01/16/2020 HOSE MAN INC 137.40 0.00 137.40 AP 00010061 01/16/2020 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 2,692.82 2,692.82 AP 00010062 01/16/2020 MIRION TECHNOLOGIES GDS INC 667.93 0.00 667.93 AP 00010065 01/16/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 8,595.47 914.16 9,509.63 *** AP 00010066 01/16/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 387.90 38.79 426.69 *** AP 00010067 01/16/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 698.70 0.00 698.70 AP 00010068 01/16/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 4,237.12 0.00 4,237.12 AP 00010069 01/16/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 1,794.99 0.00 1,794.99 AP 00010070 01/16/2020 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 719.35 0.00 719.35 AP 00010071 01/16/2020 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 48.49 0.00 48.49 AP 00010072 01/16/2020 VISTA PAINT 1,478.39 0.00 1,478.39 AP 00010073 01/22/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 9,413.84 0.00 9,413.84 AP 00010074 01/22/2020 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 1,074.12 0.00 1,074.12 AP 00010075 01/22/2020 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 329.72 0.00 329.72 AP 00010076 01/23/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1,681.97 0.00 1,681.97 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010077 01/23/2020 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 631.18 0.00 631.18 AP 00010078 01/23/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 49.39 0.00 49.39 AP 00010079 01/23/2020 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 5,826.62 5,826.62 AP 00010080 01/23/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 456.58 0.00 456.58 AP 00010081 01/23/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 898.70 148.35 1,047.05 *** AP 00010082 01/23/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 38.79 232.74 271.53 *** AP 00010083 01/23/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 588.19 0.00 588.19 AP 00010084 01/23/2020 SUNRISE FORD 45.18 0.00 45.18 AP 00010085 01/28/2020 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010086 01/28/2020 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010087 01/28/2020 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00010088 01/28/2020 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010089 01/28/2020 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010090 01/28/2020 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010091 01/28/2020 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00010092 01/28/2020 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,735.57 1,735.57 AP 00010093 01/28/2020 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010094 01/28/2020 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010095 01/28/2020 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010096 01/28/2020 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010097 01/28/2020 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010098 01/28/2020 COX, KARL 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010099 01/28/2020 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010100 01/28/2020 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010101 01/28/2020 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010102 01/28/2020 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00010103 01/28/2020 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010104 01/28/2020 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00010105 01/28/2020 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010106 01/28/2020 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010107 01/28/2020 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010108 01/28/2020 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010109 01/28/2020 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010110 01/28/2020 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010111 01/28/2020 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00010112 01/28/2020 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010113 01/28/2020 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010114 01/28/2020 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010115 01/28/2020 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010116 01/28/2020 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 948.67 948.67 AP 00010117 01/28/2020 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,487.34 1,487.34 AP 00010118 01/28/2020 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010119 01/28/2020 LONGO, JOE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010120 01/28/2020 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010121 01/28/2020 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010122 01/28/2020 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010123 01/28/2020 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 630.56 630.56 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010124 01/28/2020 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010125 01/28/2020 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010126 01/28/2020 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,792.73 1,792.73 AP 00010127 01/28/2020 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010128 01/28/2020 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010129 01/28/2020 NEE, RON 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00010130 01/28/2020 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010131 01/28/2020 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,281.58 1,281.58 AP 00010132 01/28/2020 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 563.78 563.78 AP 00010133 01/28/2020 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 854.52 854.52 AP 00010134 01/28/2020 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010135 01/28/2020 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010136 01/28/2020 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010137 01/28/2020 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010138 01/28/2020 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010139 01/28/2020 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010140 01/28/2020 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 2,154.28 2,154.28 AP 00010141 01/28/2020 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010142 01/28/2020 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00010143 01/28/2020 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010144 01/28/2020 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,975.24 1,975.24 AP 00010145 01/28/2020 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010146 01/28/2020 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010147 01/28/2020 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010148 01/28/2020 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010149 01/28/2020 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00010150 01/29/2020 BALANCE 4 LIFE FITNESS 4 WELLNESS INC 294.00 0.00 294.00 AP 00010151 01/29/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 23,785.01 0.00 23,785.01 AP 00010152 01/29/2020 RCCEA 1,981.00 0.00 1,981.00 AP 00010153 01/29/2020 RCPFA 11,058.47 0.00 11,058.47 AP 00010154 01/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00010155 01/30/2020 ABC LOCKSMITHS 2,402.20 0.00 2,402.20 AP 00010156 01/30/2020 AIRGAS USA LLC 1,718.73 341.11 2,059.84 *** AP 00010157 01/30/2020 CALSENSE 4,361.72 0.00 4,361.72 AP 00010158 01/30/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 181.86 0.00 181.86 AP 00010159 01/30/2020 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 594.26 0.00 594.26 AP 00010160 01/30/2020 DEMCOINC 308.79 0.00 308.79 AP 00010161 01/30/2020 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 2,221.67 340.56 2,562.23 *** AP 00010162 01/30/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 401.10 0.00 401.10 AP 00010163 01/30/2020 EMCOR SERVICES 27,907.59 0.00 27,907.59 AP 00010164 01/30/2020 HOSE MAN INC 752.59 59.89 812.48 *** AP 00010165 01/30/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 290.39 0.00 290.39 AP 00010166 01/30/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 2,260.31 0.00 2,260.31 AP 00010167 01/30/2020 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 0.00 210.11 210.11 AP 00010168 01/30/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 39,655.10 0.00 39,655.10 AP 00010169 01/30/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 2,654.07 0.00 2,654.07 AP 00010170 01/30/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 527.00 0.00 527.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010171 01/30/2020 STABILIZER SOLUTIONS INC 3,062.78 0.00 3,062.78 AP 00010172 01/30/2020 SUNRISE FORD 257.64 0.00 257.64 AP 00010173 01/30/2020 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 263.34 0.00 263.34 AP 00010174 01/30/2020 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 33.92 0.00 33.92 AP 00010175 01/30/2020 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 223.05 0.00 223.05 AP 00010176 01/30/2020 VISTA PAINT 2,086.77 0.00 2,086.77 AP 00010177 02/05/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 11,128.53 0.00 11,128.53 AP 00010178 02/05/2020 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010179 02/05/2020 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 529.08 0.00 529.08 AP 00010180 02/05/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 32.00 0.00 32.00 AP 00010181 02/06/2020 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 617.50 0.00 617.50 AP 00010182 02/06/2020 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 124.44 124.44 AP 00010183 02/06/2020 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 0.00 518.85 518.85 AP 00010184 02/06/2020 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 7,602.84 0.00 7,602.84 AP 00010185 02/06/2020 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 4,106.42 4,106.42 AP 00010186 02/06/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 776.90 0.00 776.90 AP 00010187 02/06/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 3,432.79 718.99 4,151.78 *** AP 00010188 02/06/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 38.79 38.79 77.58 *** AP 00010189 02/06/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 2,893.44 0.00 2,893.44 AP 00010190 02/06/2020 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 331.00 0.00 331.00 AP 00406575 01/08/2020 A & I REPROGRAPHICS 932.04 0.00 932.04 AP 00406576 01/08/2020 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 365.70 0.00 365.70 AP 00406577 01/08/2020 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES INC 665.76 0.00 665.76 AP 00406578 01/08/2020 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 961.00 0.00 961.00 AP 00406579 01/08/2020 ADVANCED EQUIPMENT CORP 44,963.50 0.00 44,963.50 AP 00406580 01/08/2020 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC 170.25 0.00 170.25 AP 00406581 01/08/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00406582 01/08/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 24.24 0.00 24.24 AP 00406583 01/08/2020 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 397.59 0.00 397.59 AP 00406584 01/08/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 30,465.00 0.00 30,465.00 AP 00406585 01/08/2020 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 67.26 0.00 67.26 AP 00406586 01/08/2020 AVNISH LLC 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00406587 01/08/2020 BABCOCK LABORATORIES INC 131.00 0.00 131.00 AP 00406588 01/08/2020 BCC CONTRACTING INC 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 AP 00406589 01/08/2020 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 11.04 11.04 AP 00406590 01/08/2020 BLACK, CATHERINE 192.50 0.00 192.50 AP 00406591 01/08/2020 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. 240.54 0.00 240.54 AP 00406592 01/08/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 3,210.80 0.00 3,210.80 AP 00406593 01/08/2020 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 1,727.15 0.00 1,727.15 AP 00406594 01/08/2020 C V W D 45.48 0.00 45.48 AP 00406595 01/08/2020 C V W D 160.07 294.83 454.90 *** AP 00406599 01/08/2020 C V W D 31,243.16 397.60 31,640.76 *** AP 00406600 01/08/2020 CA LLC - DBA ALTA LAGUNA MHP 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00406601 01/08/2020 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS CORPORATION 61,677.60 9,660.00 71,337.60 *** AP 00406602 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA ENERGY SAVERS 9.00 0.00 9.00 AP 00406603 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11 AP 00406604 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire AP 00406605 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 30.00 0.00 AP 00406606 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 7.22 0.00 AP 00406607 01/08/2020 CALIN, ANGELA 866.00 0.00 AP 00406608 01/08/2020 CALIX INC. 2,495.04 0.00 AP 00406609 01/08/2020 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 700.00 0.00 AP 00406610 01/08/2020 CHANGELAB SOLUTIONS 7,080.00 0.00 AP 00406611 01/08/2020 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 474.35 0.00 AP 00406612 01/08/2020 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 8,039.76 6,365.18 AP 00406613 01/08/2020 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 778.00 0.00 AP 00406614 01/08/2020 COOK, JANA 42.00 0.00 AP 00406615 01/08/2020 CUT N DRY RESTORATION 801.09 0.00 AP 00406616 01/08/2020 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 3,014.86 0.00 AP 00406617 01/08/2020 D M CONTRACTING INC 93,490.69 0.00 AP 00406618 01/08/2020 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 0.00 8,703.75 AP 00406619 01/08/2020 DATA TICKET INC 9,119.53 0.00 AP 00406620 01/08/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 343.00 0.00 AP 00406621 01/08/2020 DL IMAGING 1,985.05 0.00 AP 00406622 01/08/2020 ECOHERO SHOW LLC, THE 921.46 0.00 AP 00406623 01/08/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 3,965.00 0.00 AP 00406624 01/08/2020 EMPIRE LAKES HOLDING COMPANY LLC 4.00 0.00 AP 00406625 01/08/2020 ESPINOZA, ALONDRA 97.00 0.00 AP 00406626 01/08/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.20 0.00 AP 00406627 01/08/2020 FEHR AND PEERS 7,985.00 0.00 AP 00406628 01/08/2020 FIRE APPARATUS SOLUTIONS 0.00 381.58 AP 00406629 01/08/2020 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 148.96 AP 00406630 01/08/2020 FLEETPRIDE 0.00 110.23 AP 00406631 01/08/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,763.74 0.00 AP 00406632 01/08/2020 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 1,214.03 AP 00406634 01/08/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,111.13 688.87 AP 00406635 01/08/2020 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 1,210.00 0.00 AP 00406636 01/08/2020 G & M BUSINESS INTERIORS 41.65 0.00 AP 00406637 01/08/2020 GONSALVES AND SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 AP 00406638 01/08/2020 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 840.00 0.00 AP 00406639 01/08/2020 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM INC 814.00 0.00 AP 00406640 01/08/2020 GRAINGER 1,125.10 655.20 AP 00406641 01/08/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,108.76 0.00 AP 00406642 01/08/2020 GRIFFIN, ALESSANDRA 0.00 74.96 AP 00406643 01/08/2020 GROUP C MEDIA INC 1,850.00 0.00 AP 00406644 01/08/2020 GROVES ON FOOTHILL, THE 200.00 0.00 AP 00406645 01/08/2020 HALL, SUZANNE 394.00 0.00 AP 00406646 01/08/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 1,386.00 0.00 AP 00406647 01/08/2020 HARVEY, DOUGLAS REED 192.50 0.00 AP 00406648 01/08/2020 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 1,149.00 0.00 AP 00406649 01/08/2020 HI -WAY SAFETY INC 87.60 0.00 AP 00406650 01/08/2020 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 500.00 0.00 AP 00406651 01/08/2020 HONG, ZHANG YU 68.22 0.00 AP 00406652 01/08/2020 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 1,000.00 0.00 Amount 30.00 7.22 866.00 2,495.04 700.00 7,080.00 474.35 14,404.94 778.00 42.00 801.09 3,014.86 93,490.69 8,703.75 9,119.53 343.00 1,985.05 921.46 3,965.00 4.00 97.00 21.20 7,985.00 381.58 148.96 110.23 1,763.74 1,214.03 3,800.00 1,210.00 41.65 3,000.00 *** *** 840.00 814.00 1,780.30 *** 1,108.76 74.96 1,850.00 200.00 394.00 1,386.00 192.50 1,149.00 87.60 500.00 68.22 1,000.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406653 01/08/2020 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 780.00 0.00 780.00 AP 00406654 01/08/2020 IATSE NATIONAL BENEFITS FUNDS 936.00 0.00 936.00 AP 00406655 01/08/2020 IATSE NATIONAL BENEFITS FUNDS 480.00 0.00 480.00 AP 00406656 01/08/2020 INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE AND SERVICE CO 1,594.70 0.00 1,594.70 AP 00406657 01/08/2020 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00406658 01/08/2020 INLAND TOPSOIL MIXES 646.50 0.00 646.50 AP 00406659 01/08/2020 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00406660 01/08/2020 KAUFLIN, JUSTIN DANIEL 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 AP 00406661 01/08/2020 KINDRED CORPORATION 1,528.45 0.00 1,528.45 AP 00406662 01/08/2020 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 6,195.00 0.00 6,195.00 AP 00406663 01/08/2020 LEONG, JOHN 62.94 0.00 62.94 AP 00406664 01/08/2020 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,432.69 0.00 5,432.69 AP 00406665 01/08/2020 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 1,875.00 0.00 1,875.00 AP 00406666 01/08/2020 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 3,465.00 0.00 3,465.00 AP 00406667 01/08/2020 MAIN STREET SIGNS 764.59 0.00 764.59 AP 00406669 01/08/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 125,745.53 0.00 125,745.53 AP 00406670 01/08/2020 MG PETROLEUM INC 288.00 0.00 288.00 AP 00406671 01/08/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 212.34 0.00 212.34 AP 00406672 01/08/2020 MORRIS, DOUG 16,472.00 0.00 16,472.00 AP 00406673 01/08/2020 MUSIC AND THEATRE COMPANY LLC, THE 4,900.00 0.00 4,900.00 AP 00406674 01/08/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3.16 656.85 660.01 *** AP 00406675 01/08/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 746.50 40.00 786.50 *** AP 00406676 01/08/2020 OCLC INC 59.68 0.00 59.68 AP 00406677 01/08/2020 ONTRAC 42.98 0.00 42.98 AP 00406678 01/08/2020 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 5,242.38 0.00 5,242.38 AP 00406679 01/08/2020 PARKWAY CONSTRUCTION 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 AP 00406680 01/08/2020 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00406681 01/08/2020 PIP PRINTING 37.71 0.00 37.71 AP 00406682 01/08/2020 PORAC 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00406683 01/08/2020 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00406684 01/08/2020 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00406685 01/08/2020 RADIUS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 558.44 0.00 558.44 AP 00406686 01/08/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 507.61 0.00 507.61 AP 00406687 01/08/2020 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 54.43 0.00 54.43 AP 00406688 01/08/2020 RECREATION RESULTS 3,850.00 0.00 3,850.00 AP 00406689 01/08/2020 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 187.74 0.00 187.74 AP 00406690 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,360.00 0.00 3,360.00 AP 00406691 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,920.00 0.00 3,920.00 AP 00406692 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,920.00 0.00 3,920.00 AP 00406693 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,208.50 0.00 3,208.50 AP 00406694 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,743.25 0.00 3,743.25 AP 00406695 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,743.25 0.00 3,743.25 AP 00406696 01/08/2020 RIGHT OF WAY INC 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00406697 01/08/2020 ROMO PLANNING GROUP INC 4,160.00 0.00 4,160.00 AP 00406698 01/08/2020 ROSEBURROUGH TOOLS INC 1,077.11 0.00 1,077.11 AP 00406699 01/08/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 1,025.00 0.00 1,025.00 AP 00406700 01/08/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 15,275.00 0.00 15,275.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 14 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406701 01/08/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 2,600.00 0.00 2,600.00 AP 00406702 01/08/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 2,475.00 0.00 2,475.00 AP 00406703 01/08/2020 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 212.48 0.00 212.48 AP 00406704 01/08/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 21,932.23 0.00 21,932.23 AP 00406705 01/08/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 60,257.07 0.00 60,257.07 AP 00406706 01/08/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 17,218.00 0.00 17,218.00 AP 00406707 01/08/2020 SBPEA 2,601.45 0.00 2,601.45 AP 00406708 01/08/2020 SC FUELS 0.00 15,691.92 15,691.92 AP 00406709 01/08/2020 SCHWARTZ, STEPHANIE KURLEY 866.00 0.00 866.00 AP 00406710 01/08/2020 SCL 0.00 1,301.04 1,301.04 AP 00406711 01/08/2020 SEALS, KATIE 6.49 0.00 6.49 AP 00406712 01/08/2020 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00406713 01/08/2020 SHRED PROS 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00406714 01/08/2020 SINNETT CONSULTING SERVICES INC 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00406715 01/08/2020 SMITH, JAYMI LEE 866.00 0.00 866.00 AP 00406721 01/08/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16,737.88 423.36 17,161.24 *** AP 00406722 01/08/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.27 0.00 31.27 AP 00406723 01/08/2020 SPIKES, BRIANNA 220.00 0.00 220.00 AP 00406724 01/08/2020 SULLIVAN, CONNOR 192.50 0.00 192.50 AP 00406725 01/08/2020 SWEET HONEY IN THE ROCK INC 4,426.80 0.00 4,426.80 AP 00406726 01/08/2020 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00406727 01/08/2020 TAYLOR, HEATHER 192.50 0.00 192.50 AP 00406728 01/08/2020 TETRA TECH INC 8,769.00 0.00 8,769.00 AP 00406729 01/08/2020 TRI POINTE HOMES 17,368.00 0.00 17,368.00 AP 00406730 01/08/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 16,483.62 0.00 16,483.62 AP 00406731 01/08/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,121.79 0.00 1,121.79 AP 00406732 01/08/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00406733 01/08/2020 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARE FUNDS 702.00 0.00 702.00 AP 00406734 01/08/2020 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARE FUNDS 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00406735 01/08/2020 UNITED WAY 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00406736 01/08/2020 UPS 58.00 0.00 58.00 AP 00406737 01/08/2020 URBAN ARENA 2,740.00 0.00 2,740.00 AP 00406738 01/08/2020 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00406739 01/08/2020 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 1,412.50 0.00 1,412.50 AP 00406740 01/08/2020 WORLD BOOK INC 2,152.86 0.00 2,152.86 AP 00406741 01/15/2020 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES INC 665.76 0.00 665.76 AP 00406742 01/15/2020 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 0.00 140.30 140.30 AP 00406743 01/15/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00406744 01/15/2020 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 4,104.04 4,104.04 AP 00406745 01/15/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 48.48 0.00 48.48 AP 00406746 01/15/2020 ANUFORO, CHINWE 55.90 0.00 55.90 AP 00406747 01/15/2020 ARELLANO, ANGELA 5.80 0.00 5.80 AP 00406748 01/15/2020 ARK HOMES FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY 432.27 0.00 432.27 AP 00406749 01/15/2020 BENEFIT FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP 9,375.00 0.00 9,375.00 AP 00406750 01/15/2020 BILL & WAGS INC 0.00 632.81 632.81 AP 00406751 01/15/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 8,740.98 8,740.98 AP 00406752 01/15/2020 BUILDING BRIDGES FFA 500.00 0.00 500.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406753 01/15/2020 BW PRINTWORKS 0.00 130.89 130.89 AP 00406754 01/15/2020 C V W D 287.67 0.00 287.67 AP 00406763 01/15/2020 C V W D 84,174.28 664.05 84,838.33 *** AP 00406764 01/15/2020 CA EMERGENCY SERVICES ASSOCIATION 0.00 85.00 85.00 AP 00406765 01/15/2020 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 328.96 0.00 328.96 AP 00406766 01/15/2020 CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION 5,250.00 0.00 5,250.00 AP 00406767 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC INFO OFFICIALS 0.00 45.00 45.00 AP 00406768 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA BOX II 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00406769 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 1,618.20 0.00 1,618.20 AP 00406770 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 1,150.60 0.00 1,150.60 AP 00406771 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11 AP 00406772 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00406773 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 4,830.00 0.00 4,830.00 AP 00406774 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 7.22 0.00 7.22 AP 00406775 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00406776 01/15/2020 CARTER, WHITNEY NICOLE 210.00 0.00 210.00 AP 00406777 01/15/2020 CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT 0.00 3,541.96 3,541.96 AP 00406778 01/15/2020 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 768.13 0.00 768.13 AP 00406779 01/15/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 1,362.28 1,362.28 AP 00406780 01/15/2020 COMEAU, CHAD 0.00 275.00 275.00 AP 00406781 01/15/2020 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC 257.50 0.00 257.50 AP 00406782 01/15/2020 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 62.70 0.00 62.70 AP 00406783 01/15/2020 CROWN POINTE INVESTIGATIONS LLC 0.00 9,102.50 9,102.50 AP 00406784 01/15/2020 D'ALESIO GROUP INC 0.00 394.85 394.85 AP 00406785 01/15/2020 DAISY IT 425.29 0.00 425.29 AP 00406786 01/15/2020 DATA TICKET INC 6,733.24 0.00 6,733.24 AP 00406787 01/15/2020 DECESARE, CRAIG 18.15 0.00 18.15 AP 00406788 01/15/2020 DELL MARKETING LP 38,254.83 0.00 38,254.83 AP 00406789 01/15/2020 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1,279.34 0.00 1,279.34 AP 00406790 01/15/2020 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 41,977.08 0.00 41,977.08 AP 00406791 01/15/2020 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 10,285.97 0.00 10,285.97 AP 00406792 01/15/2020 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY 16,710.00 0.00 16,710.00 AP 00406793 01/15/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 0.00 210.00 210.00 AP 00406794 01/15/2020 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 127.25 0.00 127.25 AP 00406795 01/15/2020 DIRECTV 171.99 0.00 171.99 AP 00406796 01/15/2020 EDWARDS, ERIKA 6.79 0.00 6.79 AP 00406797 01/15/2020 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 187,183.54 0.00 187,183.54 AP 00406798 01/15/2020 ENGLAND, KADESHA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00406799 01/15/2020 ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION 0.00 78,491.25 78,491.25 AP 00406800 01/15/2020 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00406801 01/15/2020 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00406802 01/15/2020 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 2,626.19 2,626.19 AP 00406803 01/15/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 29.32 0.00 29.32 AP 00406804 01/15/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.05 0.00 21.05 AP 00406805 01/15/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 33.28 0.00 33.28 AP 00406806 01/15/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.18 0.00 21.18 AP 00406807 01/15/2020 FIRE APPARATUS SOLUTIONS 0.00 3,212.92 3,212.92 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 16 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406808 01/15/2020 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 74.82 74.82 AP 00406809 01/15/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,436.04 0.00 3,436.04 AP 00406810 01/15/2020 GILKEY, JOHN A 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00406811 01/15/2020 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00406812 01/15/2020 GLOBALSTAR USA 174.85 0.00 174.85 AP 00406813 01/15/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 98,749.00 1,381.00 100,130.00 *** AP 00406814 01/15/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 100,059.00 1,381.00 101,440.00 *** AP 00406815 01/15/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 99,713.00 1,114.00 100,827.00 *** AP 00406816 01/15/2020 GOMEZ, CRISTINA 52.25 0.00 52.25 AP 00406817 01/15/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 2,207.53 0.00 2,207.53 AP 00406818 01/15/2020 GRIFFIN, ALESSANDRA 0.00 33.40 33.40 AP 00406819 01/15/2020 HIGBEE & ASSOCIATES 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00406820 01/15/2020 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 14,538.71 14,538.71 AP 00406821 01/15/2020 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 688.86 0.00 688.86 AP 00406822 01/15/2020 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 151.71 151.71 AP 00406823 01/15/2020 HUDSON, MARIE 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00406824 01/15/2020 ICE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA LLC 282.42 0.00 282.42 AP 00406825 01/15/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 421.49 0.00 421.49 AP 00406826 01/15/2020 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 0.00 330.75 330.75 AP 00406827 01/15/2020 INNERLINE ENGINEERING INC 2,080.75 0.00 2,080.75 AP 00406828 01/15/2020 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 328.19 0.00 328.19 AP 00406829 01/15/2020 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 630.08 0.00 630.08 AP 00406830 01/15/2020 JEEP CHRYSLER OF ONTARIO INC 417.77 0.00 417.77 AP 00406831 01/15/2020 JIMENEZ, LORENA 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00406832 01/15/2020 K -K WOODWORKING 0.00 564.44 564.44 AP 00406833 01/15/2020 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 237,645.48 0.00 237,645.48 AP 00406834 01/15/2020 KAUFLIN, JUSTIN DANIEL 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00406835 01/15/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 0.00 16,013.00 16,013.00 AP 00406836 01/15/2020 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 10,947.21 0.00 10,947.21 AP 00406837 01/15/2020 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 3,553.44 0.00 3,553.44 AP 00406839 01/15/2020 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 6,287.58 2,513.09 8,800.67 *** AP 00406840 01/15/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 5,318.55 0.00 5,318.55 AP 00406841 01/15/2020 MACMILLIAN, BROOK 14.77 0.00 14.77 AP 00406842 01/15/2020 MADD 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00406843 01/15/2020 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 15,750.00 0.00 15,750.00 AP 00406844 01/15/2020 MAIN STREET SIGNS 463.16 0.00 463.16 AP 00406845 01/15/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 55,595.13 1,410.69 57,005.82 *** AP 00406846 01/15/2020 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 245.02 0.00 245.02 AP 00406847 01/15/2020 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00406848 01/15/2020 MATLOCK DESIGN BUILD INC 871.00 0.00 871.00 AP 00406849 01/15/2020 MCI 69.36 0.00 69.36 AP 00406850 01/15/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 170.76 0.00 170.76 AP 00406851 01/15/2020 MCMILLAN, TOM 197.00 0.00 197.00 AP 00406852 01/15/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 272.28 0.00 272.28 AP 00406853 01/15/2020 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 56.00 0.00 56.00 AP 00406854 01/15/2020 MITY LITE INC. 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00406855 01/15/2020 MMASC 90.00 0.00 90.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406856 01/15/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 139.96 0.00 139.96 AP 00406857 01/15/2020 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 20.00 20.00 AP 00406858 01/15/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 134.28 134.28 AP 00406859 01/15/2020 NEIGHBORS, ZACK 63.80 0.00 63.80 AP 00406860 01/15/2020 NEOPOST USA INC 540.46 0.00 540.46 AP 00406861 01/15/2020 NEW COLOR PRINTING 187.49 0.00 187.49 AP 00406862 01/15/2020 O'BRIEN, JAMES 0.00 564.00 564.00 AP 00406863 01/15/2020 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 620.31 0.00 620.31 AP 00406864 01/15/2020 ONTRAC 65.91 0.00 65.91 AP 00406865 01/15/2020 OPORTO III, GILBERTO 48.61 0.00 48.61 AP 00406866 01/15/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00406867 01/15/2020 P.A. DOUGLAS & ASSOCIATES INC 2,595.00 0.00 2,595.00 AP 00406868 01/15/2020 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 15,158.00 0.00 15,158.00 AP 00406869 01/15/2020 PERSITZA, ADAM 0.00 899.00 899.00 AP 00406870 01/15/2020 PERSONAL EXPOSURE REPORTING 0.00 850.00 850.00 AP 00406871 01/15/2020 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 143.75 0.00 143.75 AP 00406872 01/15/2020 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0.00 2,300.00 2,300.00 AP 00406873 01/15/2020 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00406874 01/15/2020 QUINN COMPANY 0.00 2,913.80 2,913.80 AP 00406875 01/15/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 88.74 0.00 88.74 AP 00406876 01/15/2020 RADIUS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 558.44 0.00 558.44 AP 00406877 01/15/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 40.14 0.00 40.14 AP 00406878 01/15/2020 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 0.00 265.00 265.00 AP 00406879 01/15/2020 REHABWEST INC 313.50 0.00 313.50 AP 00406880 01/15/2020 ROSE BRAND WIPERS INC 565.41 0.00 565.41 AP 00406881 01/15/2020 ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00406882 01/15/2020 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 545.00 545.00 AP 00406883 01/15/2020 SAMS CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 101.35 0.00 101.35 AP 00406884 01/15/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,797.38 0.00 2,797.38 AP 00406885 01/15/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 0.00 13,325.76 13,325.76 AP 00406886 01/15/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 26.00 0.00 26.00 AP 00406887 01/15/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DISTRICT 0.00 860.74 860.74 AP 00406888 01/15/2020 SBPEA 2,573.33 0.00 2,573.33 AP 00406889 01/15/2020 SC FUELS 25,231.29 0.00 25,231.29 AP 00406890 01/15/2020 SC FUELS 0.00 13,382.58 13,382.58 AP 00406891 01/15/2020 SECC CORP 3,665.00 0.00 3,665.00 AP 00406892 01/15/2020 SESAC INC 2,179.00 0.00 2,179.00 AP 00406893 01/15/2020 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 400.35 181.20 581.55 *** AP 00406894 01/15/2020 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00406895 01/15/2020 SHRED PROS 1,121.00 0.00 1,121.00 AP 00406896 01/15/2020 SIDEPATH INC 19,500.00 0.00 19,500.00 AP 00406897 01/15/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 272,261.48 0.00 272,261.48 AP 00406898 01/15/2020 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 39.13 0.00 39.13 AP 00406899 01/15/2020 SMITH, THERESE 56.26 0.00 56.26 AP 00406909 01/15/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33,113.32 3,546.75 36,660.07 *** AP 00406910 01/15/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 373.73 0.00 373.73 AP 00406911 01/15/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189.01 0.00 189.01 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406912 01/15/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,484.63 0.00 2,484.63 AP 00406913 01/15/2020 SPECIALIZED CARE FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00406914 01/15/2020 SPRINGSHARE LLC 899.00 0.00 899.00 AP 00406915 01/15/2020 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,611.74 0.00 3,611.74 AP 00406916 01/15/2020 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 11,852.70 0.00 11,852.70 AP 00406917 01/15/2020 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 11,852.70 0.00 11,852.70 AP 00406918 01/15/2020 SWEET HONEY IN THE ROCK INC 17,707.20 0.00 17,707.20 AP 00406919 01/15/2020 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 3,900.00 3,900.00 AP 00406920 01/15/2020 TIREHUB LLC 0.00 92.13 92.13 AP 00406921 01/15/2020 TRINITY EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1,084.15 0.00 1,084.15 AP 00406922 01/15/2020 ULINE 859.85 0.00 859.85 AP 00406923 01/15/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 281.34 0.00 281.34 AP 00406924 01/15/2020 UNITED WAY 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00406925 01/15/2020 UPS 231.90 0.00 231.90 AP 00406926 01/15/2020 UTILIQUEST 3,770.19 0.00 3,770.19 AP 00406927 01/15/2020 VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES INC 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 AP 00406932 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,665.66 0.00 5,665.66 AP 00406933 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 268.55 0.00 268.55 AP 00406934 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.12 0.00 60.12 AP 00406935 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 80.41 0.00 80.41 AP 00406936 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 421.11 0.00 421.11 AP 00406937 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,104.74 5,104.74 AP 00406938 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 4,447.33 0.00 4,447.33 AP 00406939 01/15/2020 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS 29,770.00 0.00 29,770.00 AP 00406940 01/15/2020 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS 36,166.64 0.00 36,166.64 AP 00406941 01/15/2020 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 2,475.00 0.00 2,475.00 AP 00406942 01/15/2020 VOHNE LICHE KENNELS INC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00406943 01/15/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 693.29 0.00 693.29 AP 00406944 01/15/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,154.98 1,689.88 4,844.86 *** AP 00406945 01/15/2020 WELLS, JUDITH 35.96 0.00 35.96 AP 00406946 01/15/2020 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.00 AP 00406947 01/15/2020 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 5,021.15 0.00 5,021.15 AP 00406948 01/15/2020 WILSON, GENERA 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00406949 01/15/2020 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00406950 01/15/2020 XEROX CORPORATION 1,118.45 0.00 1,118.45 AP 00406951 01/15/2020 XEROX CORPORATION 1,256.38 0.00 1,256.38 AP 00406952 01/15/2020 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 298.38 0.00 298.38 AP 00406953 01/15/2020 YERO, ART 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00406954 01/22/2020 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,964.35 0.00 5,964.35 AP 00406955 01/22/2020 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 21,908.24 0.00 21,908.24 AP 00406956 01/22/2020 ACCURATE CALIFORNIA LLC 117.19 0.00 117.19 AP 00406957 01/22/2020 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 AP 00406958 01/22/2020 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC 1,692.53 0.00 1,692.53 AP 00406959 01/22/2020 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00406960 01/22/2020 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00406961 01/22/2020 ADONIS, DARLENE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00406962 01/22/2020 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 864.50 0.00 864.50 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406963 01/22/2020 ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP 55,356.47 0.00 55,356.47 AP 00406964 01/22/2020 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC 942.17 0.00 942.17 AP 00406965 01/22/2020 AHERN RENTALS 31,188.24 0.00 31,188.24 AP 00406966 01/22/2020 ALL WELDING 1,131.38 0.00 1,131.38 AP 00406967 01/22/2020 ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION 6,900.00 0.00 6,900.00 AP 00406968 01/22/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 48.48 0.00 48.48 AP 00406969 01/22/2020 ALTUM GROUP, THE 118.50 0.00 118.50 AP 00406970 01/22/2020 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 5,967.00 0.00 5,967.00 AP 00406971 01/22/2020 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00406972 01/22/2020 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 21,118.75 0.00 21,118.75 AP 00406973 01/22/2020 ASSI SECURITY 1,060.00 0.00 1,060.00 AP 00406974 01/22/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 8,406.00 0.00 8,406.00 AP 00406975 01/22/2020 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 75.96 0.00 75.96 AP 00406976 01/22/2020 AUTOLIFT SERVICES INC 853.57 0.00 853.57 AP 00406977 01/22/2020 BABCOCK LABORATORIES INC 931.00 0.00 931.00 AP 00406978 01/22/2020 BASELINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00406979 01/22/2020 BAVARSAD, SHAHIN ADAM 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00406980 01/22/2020 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 115.55 0.00 115.55 AP 00406981 01/22/2020 BLACKSMITH SHOP, THE 4,991.63 0.00 4,991.63 AP 00406982 01/22/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 1,681.44 1,681.44 AP 00406983 01/22/2020 BRIDGEALL LIBRARIES LIMITED 16,000.00 0.00 16,000.00 AP 00406984 01/22/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 109,861.68 0.00 109,861.68 AP 00406985 01/22/2020 BURGESON'S HEATING AND AIR 239.52 0.00 239.52 AP 00406987 01/22/2020 C V W D 6,181.13 654.61 6,835.74 *** AP 00406988 01/22/2020 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 AP 00406989 01/22/2020 CALABRIA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00406990 01/22/2020 CALIFORNIA DPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 698.56 1,380.92 2,079.48 *** AP 00406991 01/22/2020 CALIFORNIA STATE SHERIFFS' ASSOC FOUNDATION 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00406992 01/22/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 113.00 0.00 113.00 AP 00406993 01/22/2020 CASTANEDA, MIGUEL 1,979.94 0.00 1,979.94 AP 00406994 01/22/2020 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 0.00 1,603.90 1,603.90 AP 00406995 01/22/2020 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 271.49 0.00 271.49 AP 00406996 01/22/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,270.56 320.84 2,591.40 *** AP 00406997 01/22/2020 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 816.20 0.00 816.20 AP 00406998 01/22/2020 CLIMATEC LLC 15,613.00 0.00 15,613.00 AP 00406999 01/22/2020 COAST RECREATION INC 113.05 0.00 113.05 AP 00407000 01/22/2020 COMMERCIAL DOOR 2,223.36 0.00 2,223.36 AP 00407001 01/22/2020 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 10,761.28 1,040.87 11,802.15 *** AP 00407002 01/22/2020 CONTRERAS, EDNA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00407003 01/22/2020 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 200.52 0.00 200.52 AP 00407004 01/22/2020 CPRS 570.00 0.00 570.00 AP 00407005 01/22/2020 CPRS 145.00 0.00 145.00 AP 00407006 01/22/2020 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 1,080.00 0.00 1,080.00 AP 00407007 01/22/2020 D & D SERVICES INC. 903.00 0.00 903.00 AP 00407008 01/22/2020 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,896.94 0.00 2,896.94 AP 00407009 01/22/2020 DE VERA JR, RENATO 104.00 0.00 104.00 AP 00407010 01/22/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 392.00 0.00 392.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407011 01/22/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,309.00 0.00 1,309.00 AP 00407012 01/22/2020 DIRECTV 85.79 0.00 85.79 AP 00407013 01/22/2020 DIRECTV 71.24 0.00 71.24 AP 00407014 01/22/2020 DOG WASTE DEPOT 465.40 0.00 465.40 AP 00407015 01/22/2020 ESPINOZA, ALBERTO 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00407016 01/22/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 27.62 0.00 27.62 AP 00407017 01/22/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 22.90 0.00 22.90 AP 00407018 01/22/2020 FIRST AID 2000 1,818.28 0.00 1,818.28 AP 00407019 01/22/2020 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00407020 01/22/2020 FLEMING'S STEAKHOUSE LLC 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00407021 01/22/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 7,151.87 0.00 7,151.87 AP 00407022 01/22/2020 FREEDOM FOREVER LLC 87.04 0.00 87.04 AP 00407023 01/22/2020 FRITTS FORD 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00407024 01/22/2020 FUEL SERV 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00407025 01/22/2020 GABRIEL, DEBRA 19.85 0.00 19.85 AP 00407026 01/22/2020 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 770.00 0.00 770.00 AP 00407027 01/22/2020 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 244.50 0.00 244.50 AP 00407028 01/22/2020 GILKEY, JOHN A 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00407029 01/22/2020 GOLDBERG, BRITNIE 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00407030 01/22/2020 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00407031 01/22/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 100,658.00 1,114.00 101,772.00 *** AP 00407032 01/22/2020 GRAINGER 552.07 108.97 661.04 *** AP 00407033 01/22/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 370.39 0.00 370.39 AP 00407034 01/22/2020 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 181.91 0.00 181.91 AP 00407035 01/22/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 330.00 0.00 330.00 AP 00407036 01/22/2020 HARGIS, ILANY G. 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00407037 01/22/2020 HARRIS, LEAH 0.00 214.00 214.00 AP 00407038 01/22/2020 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC. 239.68 0.00 239.68 AP 00407039 01/22/2020 HEARTSAVERS LLC 1,498.00 0.00 1,498.00 AP 00407040 01/22/2020 HI -WAY SAFETY INC 448.99 0.00 448.99 AP 00407041 01/22/2020 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 3,191.56 0.00 3,191.56 AP 00407042 01/22/2020 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 18,099.21 18,099.21 AP 00407043 01/22/2020 HOVEY, RICHARD 9.20 0.00 9.20 AP 00407044 01/22/2020 HUITT-ZOLLARS INC 2,675.00 0.00 2,675.00 AP 00407045 01/22/2020 HUITT-ZOLLARS INC 4,410.00 0.00 4,410.00 AP 00407046 01/22/2020 HULT, JACOB 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00407047 01/22/2020 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00407048 01/22/2020 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 1,955.52 0.00 1,955.52 AP 00407049 01/22/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 3,892.09 0.00 3,892.09 AP 00407050 01/22/2020 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00407051 01/22/2020 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 527.68 0.00 527.68 AP 00407052 01/22/2020 INTERNATIONAL COATINGS COMPANY INC 3,124.75 0.00 3,124.75 AP 00407053 01/22/2020 INTERVET INC 2,567.25 0.00 2,567.25 AP 00407054 01/22/2020 INYO NETWORKS 6,594.04 0.00 6,594.04 AP 00407055 01/22/2020 ITRON INC 5,997.84 0.00 5,997.84 AP 00407056 01/22/2020 JAHN, JOSHUA D 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00407057 01/22/2020 JIMENEZ, MICHELLE 140.00 0.00 140.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407058 01/22/2020 JOHNSON, NICHOLAS 0.00 554.00 554.00 AP 00407059 01/22/2020 K -K WOODWORKING 86.11 0.00 86.11 AP 00407060 01/22/2020 KINDRED CORPORATION 7,285.89 0.00 7,285.89 AP 00407061 01/22/2020 KWAPINSKI, SASHA 243.91 0.00 243.91 AP 00407062 01/22/2020 LAMP, JULIE 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00407063 01/22/2020 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00407064 01/22/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 91,899.12 4,900.85 96,799.97 *** AP 00407065 01/22/2020 MCALLISTER, WILLIAM 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00407066 01/22/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 292.00 0.00 292.00 AP 00407067 01/22/2020 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 252.00 2,532.00 2,784.00 *** AP 00407068 01/22/2020 MITY LITE INC. 7,203.22 0.00 7,203.22 AP 00407069 01/22/2020 MITY LITE INC. 12,192.43 0.00 12,192.43 AP 00407070 01/22/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 497.59 0.00 497.59 AP 00407071 01/22/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 37.70 0.00 37.70 AP 00407072 01/22/2020 NEW COLOR PRINTING 178.87 0.00 178.87 AP 00407073 01/22/2020 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 1,727.23 0.00 1,727.23 AP 00407074 01/22/2020 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 2,359.73 0.00 2,359.73 AP 00407075 01/22/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 13,575.00 13,575.00 AP 00407076 01/22/2020 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 0.00 107.98 107.98 AP 00407077 01/22/2020 ONWARD ENGINEERING 39,818.13 0.00 39,818.13 AP 00407078 01/22/2020 OPARC 264.00 0.00 264.00 AP 00407079 01/22/2020 OPARC ADC RANCHO 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407080 01/22/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,011.08 898.10 1,909.18 *** AP 00407081 01/22/2020 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS INC 539.52 0.00 539.52 AP 00407082 01/22/2020 PANINI KABOB GRILL 1,634.61 0.00 1,634.61 AP 00407083 01/22/2020 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 593.28 0.00 593.28 AP 00407084 01/22/2020 PFINIX CREATIVE GROUP 9,250.00 0.00 9,250.00 AP 00407085 01/22/2020 POSTAL PERFECT 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00407086 01/22/2020 PRIME GLASS 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00407087 01/22/2020 QUINN COMPANY 43.56 0.00 43.56 AP 00407088 01/22/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 2,631.92 0.00 2,631.92 AP 00407089 01/22/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 11.31 0.00 11.31 AP 00407090 01/22/2020 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00407091 01/22/2020 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 614.95 0.00 614.95 AP 00407092 01/22/2020 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 231.25 0.00 231.25 AP 00407093 01/22/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 AP 00407094 01/22/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 0.00 13,272.02 13,272.02 AP 00407095 01/22/2020 SC FUELS 3,597.59 0.00 3,597.59 AP 00407096 01/22/2020 SCHARDIJN, AMY 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00407097 01/22/2020 SIGN SHOP, THE 36.64 0.00 36.64 AP 00407098 01/22/2020 SO CAL SANDBAGS 1,985.29 0.00 1,985.29 AP 00407100 01/22/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 4,262.84 0.00 4,262.84 AP 00407101 01/22/2020 SOLARWINDS INC 3,496.00 0.00 3,496.00 AP 00407102 01/22/2020 SOUTH COAST AQMD 557.42 0.00 557.42 AP 00407107 01/22/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70,045.33 1,285.59 71,330.92 *** AP 00407108 01/22/2020 STADIUM PLAZA SOUTH OWNERS ASSOCIATION 198.23 0.00 198.23 AP 00407109 01/22/2020 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,149.85 0.00 1,149.85 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407110 01/22/2020 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 1,292.74 0.00 1,292.74 AP 00407111 01/22/2020 SUPERION LLC 550.00 0.00 550.00 AP 00407112 01/22/2020 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 300.00 300.00 AP 00407113 01/22/2020 TIREHUB LLC 476.79 0.00 476.79 AP 00407114 01/22/2020 TOT LOT PROS INC 41,600.00 0.00 41,600.00 AP 00407115 01/22/2020 TRINITY EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1,469.72 0.00 1,469.72 AP 00407116 01/22/2020 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 1,519.25 0.00 1,519.25 AP 00407117 01/22/2020 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00407118 01/22/2020 UPS 45.55 0.00 45.55 AP 00407119 01/22/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 102.70 0.00 102.70 AP 00407120 01/22/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 421.11 0.00 421.11 AP 00407121 01/22/2020 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 14,086.82 0.00 14,086.82 AP 00407122 01/22/2020 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER LLC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407123 01/22/2020 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,639.86 0.00 10,639.86 AP 00407124 01/22/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 2,723.28 0.00 2,723.28 AP 00407125 01/22/2020 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 7.49 0.00 7.49 AP 00407126 01/22/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 4,775.74 0.00 4,775.74 AP 00407127 01/22/2020 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF VET MEDICINE 1,105.00 0.00 1,105.00 AP 00407128 01/22/2020 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 731.69 0.00 731.69 AP 00407129 01/22/2020 XIE, LUXI 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00407130 01/22/2020 ZOETIS US LLC 3,242.84 0.00 3,242.84 AP 00407131 01/22/2020 ZOOBEAN INC 3,395.75 0.00 3,395.75 AP 00407132 01/22/2020 ZUNIGA, CRYSTAL 609.68 0.00 609.68 AP 00407133 01/28/2020 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM 0.00 1,666.26 1,666.26 AP 00407134 01/28/2020 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00407135 01/28/2020 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00407136 01/28/2020 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00407137 01/29/2020 6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF LLC 16,160.00 0.00 16,160.00 AP 00407138 01/29/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00407139 01/29/2020 AIR & HOSE SOURCE INC 48.49 0.00 48.49 AP 00407140 01/29/2020 ALCORN, RICHARD 13.00 0.00 13.00 AP 00407141 01/29/2020 ALL WELDING 1,315.00 0.00 1,315.00 AP 00407142 01/29/2020 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 398.00 0.00 398.00 AP 00407143 01/29/2020 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 6,670.80 0.00 6,670.80 AP 00407144 01/29/2020 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 13,933.75 0.00 13,933.75 AP 00407145 01/29/2020 AROCHO, ALMA 1,369.20 0.00 1,369.20 AP 00407146 01/29/2020 ASSI SECURITY 1,200.00 883.55 2,083.55 *** AP 00407147 01/29/2020 ASUNCION, JHONALEE 15.08 0.00 15.08 AP 00407148 01/29/2020 AUNTIE M CREATIVE CONSULTANTS INC 3,710.94 0.00 3,710.94 AP 00407149 01/29/2020 AUNTIE ROXIE'S LIFE OF THE PARTY 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00407150 01/29/2020 BANK OF AMERICA LSG CAP LSR 162.00 0.00 162.00 AP 00407151 01/29/2020 BAST, KAROLYN 422.40 0.00 422.40 AP 00407152 01/29/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 2,342.32 2,342.32 AP 00407153 01/29/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 28,673.14 0.00 28,673.14 AP 00407154 01/29/2020 BURGESON'S HEATING AND AIR 179.64 0.00 179.64 AP 00407155 01/29/2020 C V W D 113.89 0.00 113.89 AP 00407161 01/29/2020 C V W D 27,694.73 363.06 28,057.79 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 23 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cu Fire Amount AP 00407162 01/29/2020 C.P. GENERATOR INC. 64.65 0.00 64.65 AP 00407163 01/29/2020 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION 6,144.52 0.00 6,144.52 AP 00407164 01/29/2020 CALIFORNIA SATSANG SOCIETY 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00407165 01/29/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 7.22 0.00 7.22 AP 00407166 01/29/2020 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 64,263.08 0.00 64,263.08 AP 00407167 01/29/2020 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 105.60 0.00 105.60 AP 00407168 01/29/2020 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 277.77 0.00 277.77 AP 00407169 01/29/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 4,849.14 120.09 4,969.23 *** AP 00407170 01/29/2020 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 6,640.00 0.00 6,640.00 AP 00407171 01/29/2020 CLARK, KAREN 648.00 0.00 648.00 AP 00407172 01/29/2020 CLIMATEC LLC 7,479.00 0.00 7,479.00 AP 00407173 01/29/2020 COAST RECREATION INC 709.65 0.00 709.65 AP 00407174 01/29/2020 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 1,426.84 346.96 1,773.80 *** AP 00407175 01/29/2020 CONVERGEONE INC 16,685.00 0.00 16,685.00 AP 00407176 01/29/2020 D M CONTRACTING INC 68,193.57 0.00 68,193.57 AP 00407177 01/29/2020 DAIMLER TRUST LSR 70.00 0.00 70.00 AP 00407178 01/29/2020 DCS PRINT SHOP LLC 687.98 0.00 687.98 AP 00407179 01/29/2020 DIG SAFE BOARD 342.14 0.00 342.14 AP 00407180 01/29/2020 DOBOS, JAMES L. 36.00 0.00 36.00 AP 00407181 01/29/2020 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 301.20 0.00 301.20 AP 00407182 01/29/2020 DUNN, ANNE MARIE 921.60 0.00 921.60 AP 00407183 01/29/2020 EASTERLING, RAY 278.40 0.00 278.40 AP 00407184 01/29/2020 ECOHERO SHOW LLC, THE 921.46 0.00 921.46 AP 00407185 01/29/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 440.00 0.00 440.00 AP 00407186 01/29/2020 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 104,864.80 0.00 104,864.80 AP 00407187 01/29/2020 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 0.00 380.00 380.00 AP 00407188 01/29/2020 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 204.74 0.00 204.74 AP 00407189 01/29/2020 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 207.28 207.28 AP 00407190 01/29/2020 FERREIRA 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00407191 01/29/2020 FIRST AID 2000 1,757.89 0.00 1,757.89 AP 00407192 01/29/2020 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 2,700.00 0.00 2,700.00 AP 00407193 01/29/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 10,341.51 0.00 10,341.51 AP 00407195 01/29/2020 FRONTIER COMM 2,104.02 947.14 3,051.16 *** AP 00407196 01/29/2020 FUEL SERV 720.91 190.00 910.91 *** AP 00407197 01/29/2020 GARNER, WILLIAM 140.00 0.00 140.00 AP 00407198 01/29/2020 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,938.00 0.00 1,938.00 AP 00407199 01/29/2020 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 144.00 0.00 144.00 AP 00407200 01/29/2020 GONSALVES AND SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00407201 01/29/2020 GONZALEZ, CATHY 36.00 0.00 36.00 AP 00407202 01/29/2020 GRAINGER 390.49 100.43 490.92 *** AP 00407203 01/29/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 794.65 0.00 794.65 AP 00407204 01/29/2020 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO 159.13 0.00 159.13 AP 00407205 01/29/2020 GREATER TALENT NETWORK LLC 950.43 0.00 950.43 AP 00407206 01/29/2020 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 1,650.00 0.00 1,650.00 AP 00407207 01/29/2020 HAMPTON YOGA 965.40 0.00 965.40 AP 00407208 01/29/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 3,681.00 0.00 3,681.00 AP 00407209 01/29/2020 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC. 19.80 0.00 19.80 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 24 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407210 01/29/2020 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 231.00 0.00 231.00 AP 00407211 01/29/2020 HI -WAY SAFETY INC 9,872.75 0.00 9,872.75 AP 00407212 01/29/2020 HI -LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 308.30 0.00 308.30 AP 00407213 01/29/2020 HUBBERT, JAMES LIDELL 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00407214 01/29/2020 I A A P CALIFORNIA DIVISION 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00407215 01/29/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 1,980.04 0.00 1,980.04 AP 00407216 01/29/2020 INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL COMPOSTING AUTHORITY 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00407217 01/29/2020 INLAND EMPIRE UNITED WAY 0.00 20.00 20.00 AP 00407218 01/29/2020 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 0.00 1,396.00 1,396.00 AP 00407219 01/29/2020 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 531.88 0.00 531.88 AP 00407220 01/29/2020 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 730.15 0.00 730.15 AP 00407221 01/29/2020 INYO NETWORKS 7,015.97 0.00 7,015.97 AP 00407222 01/29/2020 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 1,548.00 0.00 1,548.00 AP 00407223 01/29/2020 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 254,062.39 0.00 254,062.39 AP 00407224 01/29/2020 LAKIN, LYNSEY 18.00 0.00 18.00 AP 00407225 01/29/2020 LAPG 1,772.68 0.00 1,772.68 AP 00407226 01/29/2020 LAUNDRYMATCH LLC 607.25 0.00 607.25 AP 00407227 01/29/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 522.00 0.00 522.00 AP 00407228 01/29/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 18,667.61 0.00 18,667.61 AP 00407229 01/29/2020 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 277.92 0.00 277.92 AP 00407230 01/29/2020 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 44.00 0.00 44.00 AP 00407231 01/29/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 540.43 0.00 540.43 AP 00407232 01/29/2020 MESKO RESTAURANT GROUP IV INC A CA CORP 1,012.97 0.00 1,012.97 AP 00407233 01/29/2020 MG PETROLEUM INC 489.00 0.00 489.00 AP 00407234 01/29/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 138.01 0.00 138.01 AP 00407235 01/29/2020 MOCK, JASON 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407236 01/29/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW EM PHYS MEDICAL GROUP INC 0.00 315.00 315.00 AP 00407237 01/29/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 30.90 1,365.57 1,396.47 *** AP 00407238 01/29/2020 NBS 21,688.24 0.00 21,688.24 AP 00407239 01/29/2020 NEOPOST-4715 - FIRST DATA REMITCO 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 AP 00407240 01/29/2020 NEXTECH SYSTEMS INC 29,997.60 0.00 29,997.60 AP 00407241 01/29/2020 NICHOLAS E ROSE MEDICAL CONSULTING INC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00407242 01/29/2020 NIETO, JACOB 87.00 0.00 87.00 AP 00407243 01/29/2020 NV5INC 33,100.64 0.00 33,100.64 AP 00407244 01/29/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 373.00 373.00 AP 00407245 01/29/2020 ONTARIO ELKS LODGE #1419 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00407246 01/29/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 463.00 0.00 463.00 AP 00407247 01/29/2020 ORONA, PATRICIA 1,085.00 0.00 1,085.00 AP 00407248 01/29/2020 OTT, LAURA 936.00 0.00 936.00 AP 00407249 01/29/2020 OTT, SHARON 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00407250 01/29/2020 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00407251 01/29/2020 PARTIDA, CARLOS 1.00 0.00 1.00 AP 00407252 01/29/2020 PENDLETON, CARISSA 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00407253 01/29/2020 PFINIX CREATIVE GROUP 9,250.00 0.00 9,250.00 AP 00407254 01/29/2020 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00407255 01/29/2020 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 12,973.14 12,973.14 AP 00407256 01/29/2020 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 1,227.24 0.00 1,227.24 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cu Fire Amount AP 00407257 01/29/2020 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING 2,345.75 0.00 2,345.75 AP 00407258 01/29/2020 QUALITY TURF CONSTRUCTION 405.16 0.00 405.16 AP 00407259 01/29/2020 QUINN COMPANY 0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00 AP 00407260 01/29/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 978.40 0.00 978.40 AP 00407261 01/29/2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,333.34 0.00 3,333.34 AP 00407262 01/29/2020 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 315.00 0.00 315.00 AP 00407263 01/29/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 17.59 0.00 17.59 AP 00407264 01/29/2020 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 710.00 0.00 710.00 AP 00407265 01/29/2020 ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 474.00 0.00 474.00 AP 00407266 01/29/2020 RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER 648.29 0.00 648.29 AP 00407267 01/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 0.00 5,763.53 5,763.53 AP 00407268 01/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 70.41 0.00 70.41 AP 00407269 01/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 18,084.96 0.00 18,084.96 AP 00407270 01/29/2020 SBCTOA 0.00 50.00 50.00 AP 00407271 01/29/2020 SBPEA 2,605.74 0.00 2,605.74 AP 00407272 01/29/2020 SC FUELS 24,443.01 0.00 24,443.01 AP 00407273 01/29/2020 SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407274 01/29/2020 SHOETERIA 911.69 0.00 911.69 AP 00407275 01/29/2020 SHRED PROS 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00407276 01/29/2020 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 7,460.90 0.00 7,460.90 AP 00407278 01/29/2020 SOBHIAN, SHAYAN 139.00 0.00 139.00 AP 00407279 01/29/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,720.68 0.00 1,720.68 AP 00407280 01/29/2020 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 4,032.00 0.00 4,032.00 AP 00407281 01/29/2020 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 681.88 681.88 AP 00407282 01/29/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,845.55 0.00 8,845.55 AP 00407283 01/29/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,387.29 0.00 1,387.29 AP 00407284 01/29/2020 SWEET HONEY IN THE ROCK INC 1,666.00 0.00 1,666.00 AP 00407285 01/29/2020 TECH PRODUCTS INC 3,670.54 0.00 3,670.54 AP 00407286 01/29/2020 TETRA TECH INC 12,864.50 0.00 12,864.50 AP 00407287 01/29/2020 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 110.00 3,367.00 3,477.00 *** AP 00407288 01/29/2020 TIREHUB LLC 710.83 618.64 1,329.47 *** AP 00407289 01/29/2020 TOT LOT PROS INC 163,300.00 0.00 163,300.00 AP 00407290 01/29/2020 TSI INCORPORATED 0.00 751.30 751.30 AP 00407291 01/29/2020 TYUS, IDA 739.80 0.00 739.80 AP 00407292 01/29/2020 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 835.00 0.00 835.00 AP 00407293 01/29/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,124.58 0.00 1,124.58 AP 00407294 01/29/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 22,839.71 0.00 22,839.71 AP 00407295 01/29/2020 ULINE 324.33 0.00 324.33 AP 00407296 01/29/2020 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 138.70 0.00 138.70 AP 00407297 01/29/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 953.64 0.00 953.64 AP 00407298 01/29/2020 UPS 31.00 0.00 31.00 AP 00407299 01/29/2020 URBAN ARENA 72,421.00 0.00 72,421.00 AP 00407300 01/29/2020 US POSTMASTER 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 AP 00407301 01/29/2020 UTILITY CRANE & EQUIPMENT INC 2,613.53 0.00 2,613.53 AP 00407302 01/29/2020 VELARDE, FRITZ 37.00 0.00 37.00 AP 00407303 01/29/2020 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 44.57 0.00 44.57 AP 00407304 01/29/2020 VIRGIN PULSE INC 1,096.80 0.00 1,096.80 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 18 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 26 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407305 01/29/2020 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 357.42 0.00 357.42 AP 00407306 01/29/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 3,816.18 0.00 3,816.18 AP 00407307 01/29/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 4,461.09 0.00 4,461.09 AP 00407308 01/29/2020 WEISE, PETER 38.07 0.00 38.07 AP 00407309 01/29/2020 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 171.97 0.00 171.97 AP 00407310 01/29/2020 WEST END YMCA/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,439.96 0.00 9,439.96 AP 00407311 01/29/2020 WEST END YMCA/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10,119.78 0.00 10,119.78 AP 00407312 01/29/2020 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 1,099.86 0.00 1,099.86 AP 00407313 01/29/2020 WYATT GROUP, THE 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00407314 01/29/2020 YANG, FANG 73.67 0.00 73.67 AP 00407315 01/29/2020 YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP INC 0.00 21,648.75 21,648.75 AP 00407316 01/29/2020 ZALEWSKI, JOHN 868.00 0.00 868.00 AP 00407317 01/29/2020 ZEPEDA, TRACY 32.41 0.00 32.41 AP 00407318 02/04/2020 US POSTMASTER 1,510.00 0.00 1,510.00 AP 00407319 02/05/2020 49ER COMMUNICATIONS 0.00 1,301.74 1,301.74 AP 00407320 02/05/2020 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 2,793.47 0.00 2,793.47 AP 00407321 02/05/2020 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 4,088.21 4,088.21 AP 00407322 02/05/2020 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 459.00 0.00 459.00 AP 00407323 02/05/2020 AMUNDSON, STEPHEN ALBERT 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00407324 02/05/2020 AUNTIE M CREATIVE CONSULTANTS INC 377.50 0.00 377.50 AP 00407325 02/05/2020 BAKER & TAYLOR LLC 25.37 0.00 25.37 AP 00407326 02/05/2020 BALDACCI, DENISE 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00407327 02/05/2020 BAUER COMPRESSORS 0.00 3,944.00 3,944.00 AP 00407328 02/05/2020 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 11,606.00 0.00 11,606.00 AP 00407329 02/05/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 268.43 268.43 AP 00407330 02/05/2020 BRAVO-VALDEZ, PATRICIA 196.21 0.00 196.21 AP 00407331 02/05/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 19,881.67 0.00 19,881.67 AP 00407332 02/05/2020 BURGESON'S HEATING AND AIR 119.76 0.00 119.76 AP 00407333 02/05/2020 C V W D 133.33 0.00 133.33 AP 00407339 02/05/2020 C V W D 24,000.23 826.29 24,826.52 *** AP 00407340 02/05/2020 C.P. GENERATOR INC. 150.85 0.00 150.85 AP 00407341 02/05/2020 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 1,889.13 5,699.93 7,589.06 *** AP 00407342 02/05/2020 CHAVEZ, JESUS 56.30 0.00 56.30 AP 00407343 02/05/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,268.05 462.62 1,730.67 *** AP 00407344 02/05/2020 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP LLC 270.00 0.00 270.00 AP 00407345 02/05/2020 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 176,393.00 176,393.00 AP 00407346 02/05/2020 COOK, JANA 28.48 0.00 28.48 AP 00407347 02/05/2020 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 144.00 0.00 144.00 AP 00407348 02/05/2020 CROWN POINTE INVESTIGATIONS LLC 0.00 4,225.00 4,225.00 AP 00407349 02/05/2020 CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE 0.00 341.20 341.20 AP 00407350 02/05/2020 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 856.61 1,206.98 2,063.59 *** AP 00407351 02/05/2020 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 8,167.91 0.00 8,167.91 AP 00407352 02/05/2020 DESER, ABIGAIL 1,434.00 0.00 1,434.00 AP 00407353 02/05/2020 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 48.00 0.00 48.00 AP 00407354 02/05/2020 DR HORTON / WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING INC 14.42 0.00 14.42 AP 00407355 02/05/2020 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 571.08 0.00 571.08 AP 00407356 02/05/2020 ENGLISH, DENISE 250.00 0.00 250.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 19 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407357 02/05/2020 ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION 0.00 78,491.25 78,491.25 AP 00407358 02/05/2020 EVANS, DESHAWNDA 61.60 0.00 61.60 AP 00407359 02/05/2020 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 1,297.97 0.00 1,297.97 AP 00407360 02/05/2020 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 226.44 226.44 AP 00407361 02/05/2020 FAVELA JR., RICHARD 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00407362 02/05/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 22.90 0.00 22.90 AP 00407363 02/05/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.50 0.00 20.50 AP 00407364 02/05/2020 FIREFIGHTERS' SAFETY CENTER 0.00 3,769.68 3,769.68 AP 00407365 02/05/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,358.52 0.00 1,358.52 AP 00407366 02/05/2020 FORTUNE FENCING 1,005.00 0.00 1,005.00 AP 00407367 02/05/2020 FREEWAY TOYOTA OF HANFORD 0.00 59,999.86 59,999.86 AP 00407368 02/05/2020 FRONTIER COMM 1,154.92 390.96 1,545.88 *** AP 00407369 02/05/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,389.36 0.00 3,389.36 AP 00407370 02/05/2020 GALE, BRIAN 868.00 0.00 868.00 AP 00407371 02/05/2020 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407372 02/05/2020 G & M BUSINESS INTERIORS 387.67 0.00 387.67 AP 00407373 02/05/2020 GOULD, NANCY 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407374 02/05/2020 GRAINGER 1,065.57 286.40 1,351.97 *** AP 00407375 02/05/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,504.46 0.00 1,504.46 AP 00407376 02/05/2020 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO 39.78 0.00 39.78 AP 00407377 02/05/2020 GRIFFIN, ALESSANDRA 124.50 0.00 124.50 AP 00407378 02/05/2020 GUARDIAN ROOFS & ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC 459.81 0.00 459.81 AP 00407379 02/05/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 2,028.00 0.00 2,028.00 AP 00407380 02/05/2020 HARRY AND DAVID LLC 148.01 0.00 148.01 AP 00407381 02/05/2020 HEPNER, MIREYA 287.31 0.00 287.31 AP 00407382 02/05/2020 HO, HOWARD 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00407383 02/05/2020 HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA LLC 16.11 0.00 16.11 AP 00407384 02/05/2020 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 12.20 12.20 AP 00407385 02/05/2020 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 1,490.00 0.00 1,490.00 AP 00407386 02/05/2020 HULL, DEBORAH 23,712.00 0.00 23,712.00 AP 00407387 02/05/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 226.56 0.00 226.56 AP 00407388 02/05/2020 INDEPENDENT ROOFING CONSULTANTS 4,500.00 0.00 4,500.00 AP 00407389 02/05/2020 INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL COMPOSTING AUTHORITY 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00407390 02/05/2020 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 284.25 0.00 284.25 AP 00407391 02/05/2020 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 536.75 0.00 536.75 AP 00407392 02/05/2020 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 7,701.95 2,208.45 9,910.40 *** AP 00407393 02/05/2020 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,010.34 0.00 1,010.34 AP 00407394 02/05/2020 ITERIS INC 19,802.98 0.00 19,802.98 AP 00407395 02/05/2020 JACOBS, JONATHON 3,900.00 0.00 3,900.00 AP 00407396 02/05/2020 JENSEN, KEVIN 35.61 0.00 35.61 AP 00407397 02/05/2020 JL GROUP LLC 11,769.23 0.00 11,769.23 AP 00407398 02/05/2020 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 1,296.00 0.00 1,296.00 AP 00407399 02/05/2020 KB HOME 6,127.00 0.00 6,127.00 AP 00407400 02/05/2020 KEITH, JORRY 270.00 0.00 270.00 AP 00407401 02/05/2020 KOONTZ, PHIL 1,634.61 0.00 1,634.61 AP 00407402 02/05/2020 LANDVOGT, JUSTIN 0.00 697.93 697.93 AP 00407403 02/05/2020 LAURIE, GIANFRANCO 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 20 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 28 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407404 02/05/2020 LEACH, GEORGE W 4.02 0.00 4.02 AP 00407405 02/05/2020 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00407406 02/05/2020 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00407407 02/05/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 0.00 13,442.95 13,442.95 AP 00407408 02/05/2020 LIFE ASSIST INC 12,157.59 0.00 12,157.59 AP 00407409 02/05/2020 LIMA, JENNA 112.00 0.00 112.00 AP 00407410 02/05/2020 LIN R ROGERS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS INC 236.48 0.00 236.48 AP 00407411 02/05/2020 LINNELL, SHERRY 868.00 0.00 868.00 AP 00407412 02/05/2020 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 7,085.00 0.00 7,085.00 AP 00407413 02/05/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00407414 02/05/2020 LVD EMPIRE LAKES LLC 52,104.00 0.00 52,104.00 AP 00407415 02/05/2020 MAIN STREET SIGNS 937.10 0.00 937.10 AP 00407416 02/05/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 87,747.91 0.00 87,747.91 AP 00407417 02/05/2020 MAZOR, MARYA 1,133.00 0.00 1,133.00 AP 00407418 02/05/2020 MCI 33.50 0.00 33.50 AP 00407419 02/05/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 49.46 0.00 49.46 AP 00407420 02/05/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 83.55 0.00 83.55 AP 00407421 02/05/2020 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 252.00 0.00 252.00 AP 00407422 02/05/2020 MMASC 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00407423 02/05/2020 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00407424 02/05/2020 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC 89.58 0.00 89.58 AP 00407425 02/05/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 170.95 0.00 170.95 AP 00407426 02/05/2020 MUSIC STAR 374.40 0.00 374.40 AP 00407427 02/05/2020 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY 187.54 0.00 187.54 AP 00407428 02/05/2020 NAM, YEE EUN 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 AP 00407429 02/05/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 110.76 826.50 937.26 *** AP 00407430 02/05/2020 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. 674.57 0.00 674.57 AP 00407431 02/05/2020 NV5INC 30,561.52 0.00 30,561.52 AP 00407432 02/05/2020 O S T S INC 1,770.00 0.00 1,770.00 AP 00407433 02/05/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 171.00 171.00 AP 00407434 02/05/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 982.48 234.41 1,216.89 *** AP 00407435 02/05/2020 PACIFIC WESTERN BANK 8,079.69 18,852.61 26,932.30 *** AP 00407436 02/05/2020 PATTON SALES CORP 144.04 0.00 144.04 AP 00407437 02/05/2020 PEP BOYS 10.76 0.00 10.76 AP 00407438 02/05/2020 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 5,085.42 5,085.42 AP 00407439 02/05/2020 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 544.44 0.00 544.44 AP 00407440 02/05/2020 PUBLIC GROUP OF CA LLC, THE 3,433.97 0.00 3,433.97 AP 00407441 02/05/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 463.54 0.00 463.54 AP 00407442 02/05/2020 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 153,514.10 358,199.55 511,713.65 *** AP 00407443 02/05/2020 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 722.41 0.00 722.41 AP 00407444 02/05/2020 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 0.00 984.86 984.86 AP 00407445 02/05/2020 REHABWEST INC 1,018.40 0.00 1,018.40 AP 00407446 02/05/2020 REYES COCA-COLA BOTTLING LLC 812.89 0.00 812.89 AP 00407447 02/05/2020 ROMO PLANNING GROUP INC 3,880.00 0.00 3,880.00 AP 00407448 02/05/2020 ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 3,250.00 0.00 3,250.00 AP 00407449 02/05/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 104.00 0.00 104.00 AP 00407450 02/05/2020 SCMAF INLAND VALLEYS 310.00 0.00 310.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 21 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 29 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407451 02/05/2020 SDC LEAGUE HEALTH FUND 850.00 0.00 850.00 AP 00407452 02/05/2020 SDC LEAGUE PENSION FUND 306.00 0.00 306.00 AP 00407453 02/05/2020 SERPAS BUILDING & REMODELING INC 344.79 0.00 344.79 AP 00407454 02/05/2020 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO, THE 218.27 0.00 218.27 AP 00407455 02/05/2020 SHRED PROS 68.00 113.00 181.00 *** AP 00407458 02/05/2020 SOCAL PPE 0.00 2,128.50 2,128.50 AP 00407459 02/05/2020 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 4,355.00 0.00 4,355.00 AP 00407468 02/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18,123.69 2,325.70 20,449.39 *** AP 00407469 02/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.22 0.00 36.22 AP 00407470 02/05/2020 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY & SIGNS INC 1,065.53 0.00 1,065.53 AP 00407471 02/05/2020 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 943.51 0.00 943.51 AP 00407472 02/05/2020 STOR'EM SELF STORAGE 575.00 0.00 575.00 AP 00407473 02/05/2020 SWEET DOUGH CAFE 294.00 0.00 294.00 AP 00407474 02/05/2020 THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS 2,307.76 0.00 2,307.76 AP 00407475 02/05/2020 TIREHUB LLC 2,395.00 0.00 2,395.00 AP 00407476 02/05/2020 TORO TOWING 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00407477 02/05/2020 TOT LOT PROS INC 120,300.00 0.00 120,300.00 AP 00407478 02/05/2020 TRIMARK PACIFIC 5,220.00 0.00 5,220.00 AP 00407479 02/05/2020 TRIMARK PACIFIC RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00407480 02/05/2020 TRINITY EQUIPMENT RENTALS 685.54 0.00 685.54 AP 00407481 02/05/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,134.23 0.00 1,134.23 AP 00407482 02/05/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 15,990.42 0.00 15,990.42 AP 00407483 02/05/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00407484 02/05/2020 UNITED WAY 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00407485 02/05/2020 UPLAND AUTO TRIM 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00407486 02/05/2020 UPS 31.00 0.00 31.00 AP 00407487 02/05/2020 UTILITY CRANE & EQUIPMENT INC 1,147.48 0.00 1,147.48 AP 00407488 02/05/2020 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 42.99 42.99 AP 00407489 02/05/2020 VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 26,237.64 0.00 26,237.64 AP 00407490 02/05/2020 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00407491 02/05/2020 VELARDE, HOPE 15.99 0.00 15.99 AP 00407492 02/05/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,015.35 5,015.35 AP 00407493 02/05/2020 VIVINT SOLAR DEVELOPER LLC 333.46 0.00 333.46 AP 00407494 02/05/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,351.56 33.17 1,384.73 *** AP 00407495 02/05/2020 WORLD ELITE GYMNASTICS 262.50 0.00 262.50 AP 00407496 02/05/2020 WYSOCKI, ASHLEY 109.72 0.00 109.72 Total City: $6,473,800.02 Total Fire: $1,227,227.79 Grand Total: Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 22 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 30 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 12/2 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 5,721.75 5,721.75 12/2 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 911.24 - 911.24 12/2 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 3,677.35 3,677.35 12/3 Bank Fee 69.35 69.35 12/3 U.S. BANK - Purchasing Card Payment 29,492.41 16,471.71 45,964.12 12/3 U.S. BANK - Corporate Card Payment 59,473.88 24,578.14 84,052.02 12/3 U.S. BANK - Costco Card Payment 733.37 492.05 1,225.42 12/3 Workers Comp- City Account Transfer 1,725.66 - 1,725.66 12/3 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 24.00 24.00 12/4 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,062.50 - 2,062.50 12/4 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 866.50 - 866.50 12/4 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 492.09 492.09 12/5 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments - 5,304.86 5,304.86 12/5 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 4,969.05 - 4,969.05 12/5 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 7,177.13 7,177.13 12/6 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 57,740.05 - 57,740.05 12/6 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 119,900.53 - 119,900.53 12/6 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 1,082.72 1,082.72 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,920.59 2,920.59 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,952.92 3,952.92 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,507.48 4,507.48 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 9,292.50 9,292.50 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 12,026.23 12,026.23 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit - 113,100.72 113,100.72 12/9 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 226.57 - 226.57 12/9 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 317.42 317.42 12/10 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 73,171.76 - 73,171.76 12/10 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 804.90 - 804.90 12/10 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 151.34 151.34 12/11 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 4,049.10 - 4,049.10 12/11 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 16,272.15 16,272.15 12/12 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 110.19 - 110.19 12/12 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 175.08 175.08 12/13 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 3,026.00 - 3,026.00 12/13 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 1,748.54 1,748.54 12/16 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 4,948.08 - 4,948.08 12/16 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 296.42 - 296.42 12/16 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 318.78 318.78 12/17 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,062.50 - 2,062.50 12/17 Workers Comp- City Account Transfer 1,559.58 - 1,559.58 12/18 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 163,008.64 163,008.64 12/19 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments - 4,863.69 4,863.69 12/19 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 172.83 - 172.83 12/19 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 431.44 431.44 12/20 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 595.19 - 595.19 12/23 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 6,419.10 6,419.10 12/23 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 488.16 - 488.16 12/23 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 1,444.28 1,444.28 12/24 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 54,780.00 - 54,780.00 12/24 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 114,080.00 - 114,080.00 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit - 2,604.77 2,604.77 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,563.92 3,563.92 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,760.18 4,760.18 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 9,292.50 9,292.50 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 12,271.68 12,271.68 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 113,362.05 113,362.05 1 Page 31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 12/24 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,062.50 2,062.50 12/26 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,942.81 - 1,942.81 12/26 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 7,173.60 7,173.60 12/27 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 6,937.50 - 6,937.50 12/27 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,999.95 - 2,999.95 12/27 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 2,408.45 2,408.45 12/30 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,599.58 - 1,599.58 12/30 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 90.99 90.99 12/31 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 2,931.17 - 2,931.17 12/31 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 6,014.48 - 6,014.48 12/31 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments - 5,044.89 5,044.89 TOTAL CITY 574,944.66 TOTAL FIRE 554,404.88 G RAND TOTAL 1,129, 349.54 2 Page 32 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS FOR CHECKS ISSUED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,233.81 DATED JANUARY 07, 2020 THROUGH FEBRUARY 10, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Fire Board approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 So Ca Gas - Check Register Page 33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406716 01/08/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 19,063.00 2,564.81 21,627.81 *** AP 00406900 01/15/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 794.19 0.00 794.19 AP 00407099 01/22/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 20.43 1,458.81 1,479.24 *** AP 00407277 01/29/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 18,073.34 1,845.32 19,918.66 *** AP 00407456 02/05/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,889.17 364.87 6,254.04 *** AP 00407457 02/05/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 867.95 0.00 867.95 Total City: $44,708.08 Total Fire: $6,233.81 Grand Total: S50,94T.Wq Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:16:54 Page 34 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Department Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE CURRENT INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2019. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the President and Members of the Board of Directors receive and file the attached current investment schedule for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as of December 31, 2019. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedule as of December 31, 2019 reflects cash and investments managed by the Finance/Treasury Management Division and is in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's adopted Investment Policy as approved by the President and Members of the Board of Directors on February 20, 2019. ANALYSIS: The District's Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly investment report to the President and Members of the Board of Directors in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the District Treasurer has elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Portfolio Management - Portfolio Summary December 31, 2019 Page 35 U 7 W �2 Q W B 1 M O O Co O O oD N O M N m O A N r m O! N N C — — IV In N r`0IN N o � is rn a0 N N O N r M O � r0 O M 'C O O co mosN,0a� N O O tO f0 OND N v R D7 a M v o o 0 0 oCOoCCo N O OO O O O v C M co CA 0 n IS a O 0 CD A _ e C (O r CND C co LU ac of C O N � A {O M L. 21 E 11 W .0 O LU a - O Q 0 A l) LL ^ t` O 29 i> LL 0 a �c CL a 0 N a os NN Page 36 —0 Cn N rD N to f0 O N C C N r G O O a Y cf r e O O O P O r• N O C A DD O o m c O N O N to O O O N N w O O � N N : h b O OCL V M A M O � r0 O M 'C O O co mosN,0a� N O O tO f0 OND N v R D7 a M v o o 0 0 oCOoCCo N O OO O O O v C M co CA 0 n IS a O 0 CD A _ e C (O r CND C co LU ac of C O N � A {O M L. 21 E 11 W .0 O LU a - O Q 0 A l) LL ^ t` O 29 i> LL 0 a �c CL a 0 N a os NN Page 36 IL v � � � � d O r O Cf=Ncc a Irr m C M a 0 IL 0 E O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 r om U. co 0 vat ❑ � d a N mm C a' aB Old V 'Q O O r r N io ao N N O N O N N M M N O N N N R o O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 r N co O 8S 000 at N N O 1On O0D OpD ONO ONt N N I O v OpNpD N N v a co l'l O O !�: A N io ao N N O N O N N M M N O N N N R o O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 r n r: c N N N In W mP-� M co 1n � V-1 CNt M co M day 1� N N O O O0D OpD 0 o Ui N 10 I M ONO OpNpD N N v a C F ❑❑ G 0 o p z Z Z z z z Z z 0 0 0 In w W I, N N O w O O O w O M n O O O O O M W 0) O M N W M O O OO I� M st www W w Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ......66660 00 m Y Q a w Ix a: w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U J J J J J J J J O O 00 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 00 In O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z O S O 0 (G w 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O O W w O O O O O O O O O O N O O a OD �p O O p p O O W W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 OD O p O O W W O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O W O Vn O O O Wk O 1n O Wn O Wn N ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O �n p o N N N N N N N N N N N N N w r M O c a O y y N ❑ A ZA :31, LL Z c W N N U) LLIZ } Z LLI IM Q m J Q U v O c C N 7 a c y o o o C c m Q 0 O 0 ppS yO N A S g Z N d' O LL J U LL O Y Z � m Z Q O v z c � m H C 7 N v O Q a O) c Y L 0 o O IL co O O N •t X 0 0 0 0 �� M O O O N N N N N N N N N N NN N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N io ao N N O N O N N M M N O N N N O I� M C', 1n K7 M 1n O m O 07 r tp f� O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 r OD in cc a O N 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O O O O O O .- N N N In W mP-� M co 1n � V-1 CNt M co M day 1� co 0 O O O N O O O O O O O O O N O O O f0 O N w b 0 N O w w 0 0 w O M I� O O O 01 g O M N OO OU� O O p h M M r 0) ^ N 10 I M I m m m m co 07 <6 m m m m m m m m m m t6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O o o C F ❑❑ G 0 o p z Z Z z z z Z z 0 0 0 In w W I, N N O w O O O w O M n O O O O O M W 0) O M N W M O O OO I� M st www W w Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ......66660 00 m a w Ix a: w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U J J J J J J J J O O 00 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 00 In O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z O S O 0 (G w 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 O O O W w O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O 'Q O O O o O O O O O O O o o O OD �p O O p p O O W W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 OD O p O O W W O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O W O Vn O O O Wk O 1n O Wn O Wn N ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O �n p o N N N N N N N N N N N N N w r M O N O N N N O t0 N� O_ ' g O N W r*tN N M N OOf M f07 r M W f0 W I� O O O7 O M O ee�� OC fh aa mOaa O q to h M f0 � O W O W M M M M W V:kn W N N 1.y9) O V O O W W m) O W S O O O W W W o v_ o o v� a o v Wq o v o v_ a N —— N N r N N r— N N N .-— O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 o o o o 0 o o o o o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 C 0 C 0 C C 0 C C 0 0. 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O o O o O O o OO Wn O O V O O O LR O Wk O Wn O In In N N — — N N N N N N N— N N N .- 0 Page 37 !R !2 v�WWvv!vvWWTvv!2v 000sos00aaa0aaaa0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a N M l7 to W M Of r tq I� 0 0 0 0 0 0 r O O O O O O .- a O S a a a a a w m w w ce Y Y Y Y Y Y O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y U U U U U W Op . C ¢ z Z Z (7 C7 C7 C7 C7 z Z Z m m Q m m m M Q Q Q Q N y h H F F F C F ❑❑ G 0 o p z Z Z z z z Z z 0 0 0 www W w Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ......66660 00 W a w Ix a: w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U J J J J J J J J �- O MMMEMMWWWWWWW W J J J z > m LL l¢L laL laL lQL IaL = _ _ = = 2 = =Z Z Z co Im QJ J qJ JJ QJ qJ qJ qJ QJ J QJ qJ qJ QJ J 4J QJ c Q I Q W W w w W W W W W w W w W w W w W W W W W w W a ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL w ti � O c a O CL y y 3 O V m S �_ aD h w O M O W a W w 0 W W O w W h w W CL = W O W 0 0 .- 7 N V c � C Q w wxzijNc❑la��cnaw LL LL C� S Y Y W W QQ co W F» cm M co 00000000 N M M M M M fw7 0 0 0 M M M M M M M M M M c0+1 m :�O N U. M M M M M f0 M M M M M M M M M M M H W 0 Page 37 M V M C E m N O cm C a a cc - V C M `a a ` O g ,dp a`omE LL D O O IL m i 10 a a 0 C 0 LQ a N m t0 A Ol M m a A 0 m waq Q A L i Page 38 a N t0 n 0 T. EO m OD C'D. O a r O N SM r M C IL a 0 E �mam o IM >► o ppO d�m c o CL c .� ;s 93 W 1_Nq C a N r U. v a o N V E 4 v a N t0 n 0 T. EO OD C'D. O CD r O N SM r M C m a 0 E �mam o IM >► o ppO d�m c o CL c .� ;s 93 W L Q r {i�Li1• C a N r U. v a E O v D a N t0 n 0 O OD C'D. O O O O ppO ppO O r A O O O O m opO m O H O cq Yf co N N N N f0 h O O O 1 0 0 0 O OO Q O 0 C C C C O o g g o c 0 S co M i Qa)a) oso I N N N O O O aaa g o N 0 0 0 m � N Z M a Y O W Z Q U Z o Z Q U l J (1 r } E w E z os E m dJ < a T a y H N H W W W y W N tO Z W W W C J $ M LL LL U. O c g. O g C Y QC FL C LL C O O CL c N O N a (p CL c C Y t u O C A O m o1 O a O N h w '� 1 y N c7 10 a a N t0 n 0 ro «m c o >; U O L V C ro O �. m U �> U o m 001, O o 0 0 0 0 4 01 C E. E. a a 0 0 10 O r-� G N NM N A Cco �qQp N A O O r a m E. a 0 N J2 w 0 00) a.yN 0 C w L c% •� Q L UL V � C .O E O w 0 �a 0 0 V C C a) E u, a) c 00 c rn CU -m w Ln cm Q O J rn c Y (D U �C V O 0 U O N N N a Page 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OcoLO ccn N O O aa)) v e m v M E N a) } M 10 N } N N L C O N r (O CO) .r- 0 2 co a) v c n Page 42 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Department Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE CURRENT INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF JANUARY 31, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the President and Members of the Board of Directors receive and file the attached current investment schedule for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as of January 31, 2020. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedule as of January 31, 2020 reflects cash and investments managed by the Finance/Treasury Management Division and is in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's adopted Investment Policy as approved by the President and Members of the Board of Directors on February 20, 2019. ANALYSIS: The District's Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly investment report to the President and Members of the Board of Directors in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the District Treasurer has elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Portfolio Management - Portfolio Summary January 31, 2020 Page 43 m 0) C �Op U U 0 O U M T c W I Og O IL Ygg � m� I�ooo �Ico W 1* -:N t` O cofV I, — O M N a co n f0 v m co A N M r r r u O M N Q O r u� o rn rp 0 0 O C N M O O OMi O W N O O Oi �l1 M r o O C7 L O N tq M O N t0 N O W O O N M M W N M N O co f0 M O O � N O N O N N O! O N O O A M M co O A n N M M N r 9 ro ao Fi M N co A C S co C mYL c UL ti�pp r OD Q V y " a v a' amo D a v W d d ici o c o Ui 0 a. 2 H v rn o W o c C 'O C O Q O z W N M O 0 0 cc Dam _ C 'Q N N N Q ° 0 a U- F w Q Q Of Q Q M M C I A C S co C mYL c UL ti�pp r OD Q V y " LL O v a' amo D a v WI r z c (P h 0 a. 2 H v o L) 'O C O Q O z cc Dam _ C 'Q r 2 c F- •'8E ° 0 a U- F w Q co F= Page 44 C, - a eS to C mYL LL O ^ r� m amo WI r z c (P 0 a. a m a c y +=C% O _ E Dam _ c F- •'8E 8 E a 0) 0 E; _ N r- 0 N E N 2 N � e LL L O W _ O 010 CL 7 d7 w C to m Cp 82 O. C A O 1 MS 'C m O) C y m 13 S g a c Ii a o 6 C LO O E EL CL �0 U _) C a mo N A Q .. N N M 0 am T m U Q N 8 N E O N C Z H V 7 d 0y N O l0 O O AEU) c :Ep o Ca m W a m o Page 44 8 m V IO m m m n N m 0 N N f0 w N m Ifl O N n n to On f � � m m n N m Iq Ol I OQO m fD t0 V N N OD V m n N N G Q O O N O O C9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Iq O O O Of m f0 N O a n. N N 0 r7 C N — .- e- N N— .- —— N N N — —— r m C 1 0 `a a +� IL C m a' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O¢ O O O O fq o O o e 0 Of n N N 0 " wC O O Iq O M n o 0 0 Iq t9 Of m R of N O m m O O Iq O O m i� Iq V; 1. .- —— N N aa- — —— N V IL O N co O O C9 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CL e❑ a aO N O W O 1O1Of m C w O fM0 N N Qm v� all 9 O1 I 07 co M O W Oi Of M Iq c M rn of N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O NN N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m M 9 c� m rf c� v m o o n w m c� fn fq m n n — — O O IO m m m n N m 0 N N f0 w N m Ifl O N n n to On f l I m n N m Iq Ol I OQO m fD t0 V N N OD V m n N N G I O O O O Iq IffO O O O N O O C9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Iq O O O Of m f0 N O a n. N N O O O Up O e9 n O O O Of O a0 c0 N OR O O O A Iq v m q " In Iq m n ID 't N N 0 0 l I — .- e- N N— .- —— N N N — —— r I d l m to m m to m m m m m m m ca A m co m m " 2 ¢ Q 1� " I O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O¢ O O O O fq o O o O O n I N Of n N N 0 " wC O O Iq O M n o 0 0 Iq t9 Of m R of N O m m O O Iq O O m i� Iq V; N a .- —— N N aa- — —— N p O O N O N co O O C9 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 1NN� {T a co a a a co a a a a a a a a a a a a M aO N O W O m 0 0 0 Iq 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1O1Of m N n O W W a o m O fM0 N N maa a a a a a o o aaa O Qf O Iq Of o 0 C 0 1q o Iq O Iq O Iq Iq N N N N N N N N N N— N N N •- IA � M O pp Of Of m O N m N m O m N o w m m N w m m 0 n O O N N O O O IO Yf O O Qf O 1111' m M m Of st M Iq ' O O n N m m m 0 N N aD N n m 10 aD N a aaD Dn�pp O Iq O Iq W t7 M f0 01Of OD mO M Of N N Iq O Oi O n M O 0 a0 M N M N m CO O Oi Of N V' m to N N r O W O O o W 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 C9 O V 0 0 Iq O Of Of 0 0 V 0 Iq O W O V V Yf O W d O ¢ O r N N O QQO LL o 0 W oNi j W 1aS � N N a r m CR W d O ¢ O r ❑ N t! r O Y! LL o c 0 n W c')10 � `� F zo O In N g W Mz N c C Q� LL .- '- 04 .- 04 o z O V C i LL w m 0 J > m y M ch f7 M M O O O O a s Q) M f0 C9 f9 M f0 C9 lh M C7 ch aN m co G LL f9 C9 C9 M M f9 f9 M C7 M C9 (9 M f9 f9 f9 M f9 � O) cm J o LL z zh W Q Z m m m Q Z m J Q Q z Q U o m o O v O w 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o YOI O Iq O O Iq O O O O O Iq O N O Iq O in Iq N � M m m n w rn o m m n o m m rn rn rn In m m O O O O O O O O o O o 0 o 0 o O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m CD l9 IA O O Q7 O I� Of aD fn N m N r O N N o N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A an.aaa n x a:m x x Ne se le Ne y 00 0 00 z z z z z z Y Y Y Y U U U U U 9999Q9zzzzzppppp M 9999mmm M ❑❑❑❑❑❑ z Z z z z z z z z Q Q Q N Om N W d O ¢ cc o r. LL t! r M s O a j c QJ QJQ QJQ QJQRQJQ JQ QJQ QJQ J J J JJQ' QJQ QJ J QJQ QJQ J US W c')10 h i{ N m O In N c N c C Q� LL .- '- 04 .- 04 o V C i 19o y co Z 0 > m y M ch f7 M M O O O O a s Q) M f0 C9 f9 M f0 C9 lh M C7 ch aN m co G LL f9 C9 C9 M M f9 f9 M C7 M C9 (9 M f9 f9 f9 M f9 � O) cm o c -� Q o aC Y U c @O • F Cc,), IL v V n N v}i 10 a co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 C C 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o YOI O Iq O O Iq O O O O O Iq O N O Iq O in Iq N � M m m n w rn o m m n o m m rn rn rn In m m O O O O O O O O o O o 0 o 0 o O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m CD l9 IA O O Q7 O I� Of aD fn N m N r O N N o N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A an.aaa n x a:m x x Ne se le Ne y 00 0 00 z z z z z z Y Y Y Y U U U U U 9999Q9zzzzzppppp M 9999mmm M ❑❑❑❑❑❑ z Z z z z z z z z Q Q Q N Om N W d O ¢ cc o r. LL t! r M s O a j L fn QJ QJQ QJQ QJQRQJQ JQ QJQ QJQ J J J JJQ' QJQ QJ J QJQ QJQ J LL d a t a c')10 a wW W W W w W W W w W W W W W W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LO CN In N c FL N � C Q� Of O .- '- 04 .- 04 N a Q CD 0 N M a N m 0 c O I W W W W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Ur VI 0 WO x W a x x W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J J 0 0 U U U U U U J J J J J g W W W W W W W W W J J J 2 2 2 i 2 2 2 i 2 z } xx x H F QQQQQQ000000000QQQQQ �, m 4mlL LL LL LL LL LL x x 2 2 x x 2 2 2 Z z Z L fn QJ QJQ QJQ QJQRQJQ JQ QJQ QJQ J J J JJQ' QJQ QJ J QJQ QJQ J w'� w w W W w W W w w w W W w w W W w Q Q wW W W W w W W W w W W W W W W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL W y W 7 c FL y y � C Vm n m N n CO O m M O W v Of m m W CO 4MOf O 04 m Of 1n m w Of O .- '- 04 .- 04 o V C i n a N J x W v LL❑ y ❑ m of > 2 In ] li C7 m xmxzxU->Nc934aam�cllnc7x y co Z LL (7 x Y Y J Of W S m Of F N rf Mg M fp a y M ch f7 M M O O O O a s Q) M f0 C9 f9 M f0 C9 lh M C7 ch aN m co G LL f9 C9 C9 M M f9 f9 M C7 M C9 (9 M f9 f9 f9 M f9 � O) 0 m D Page 45 N a� S si CO) V � � y O C m ; C N a ++ a C a' � 0 d0 CL m � d a mm L.V. Qm Q co 0 C N m N Ck 0 ►�C w 0 v way 25 Q n Page 46 a N zo co o I 0 A N a N w A waq v (V O N Page 47 S O O O O O C O O CtO N O o 0 0 0 0 O6 0 .n o N W O W O N N W I I. �I O I 8$ at O CM V M L O M = m CL l0 O CD Mr O a o•,� �o i LL v N Q N Cc r v CL N N N O r O tr N 0 i S O O O O O C O O CtO N O o 0 0 0 0 O6 0 .n o N W O W O N N W I I. �I I 8$ at O 2to M O O O O pS O O O CC O Q O O OW N N N O r O tr 0 0 ;a, N N S N ' r S O O O O O C O O CtO N O o 0 0 0 0 O6 0 .n o N W O W O N N W I , O O O N N N ;a, N N 0 0 0 m co N S CR O r O r r N 2 M LL Y Z QY W Z m [tl m O F r J Z ULL O U U R 0 E W_ __p 35 E Q O _ < QJQ QJQ QQ N. N. a. Q N Zh O W W W W y {O 2? w O w w c 0 c C C O a O V O • tO.i O LO co N O � U y C aC"LLm w a g CO o o L w w M F roi JH U) V d lq LL Cl) Cl) to r w O m c a� E , U >0 0 -0r- 0 V 3 O ani r- LL UiCD Iq o Y 0 Lo cm Q N N M }N m O O U Cf) 0 �+3 � ai 0 Ci (d N H N a) 3 y to U O OR C p_ N 3 -7 QUU) 0 v 0 LL co :3 M U N QU O Page 49 L r C 0 '0 0 N CL N A: •— M LL L co cu cc cc E ■O cc 0 0 t 00 IL 0 V NN� 1.� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O It � M M N N o to O m a� O v y f0 } d' ch I N M N N N r N t C O 2 N Tl N w c 0 CC) a� .0 c Page 50 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE BI -WEEKLY PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,356,491.75 AND WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS (EXCLUDING CHECKS ISSUED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY) IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,473,800.02 DATED JANUARY 07, 2020 THROUGH FEBRUARY 10, 2020 AND ELECTRONIC DEBIT REGISTER FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER IN THE AMOUNT OF $574,944.66. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 Check Register Attachment 1 Electronic Check Register Page 51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010024 01/08/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 14,280.00 0.00 14,280.00 AP 00010025 01/08/2020 EXELON GENERATION CO LLC 228,093.75 0.00 228,093.75 AP 00010026 01/08/2020 GEMINI PROJECTS 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00010027 01/08/2020 GEOGRAPHICS 4,952.73 0.00 4,952.73 AP 00010028 01/08/2020 RCCEA 1,812.50 0.00 1,812.50 AP 00010029 01/08/2020 RCPFA 11,295.27 0.00 11,295.27 AP 00010030 01/08/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 128.00 0.00 128.00 AP 00010031 01/08/2020 U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 8,253.60 0.00 8,253.60 AP 00010035 01/09/2020 BRODART BOOKS 24,288.82 0.00 24,288.82 AP 00010036 01/09/2020 DEMCOINC 99.09 0.00 99.09 AP 00010037 01/09/2020 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 9,689.61 0.00 9,689.61 AP 00010038 01/09/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 681.73 0.00 681.73 AP 00010040 01/09/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 6,510.68 0.00 6,510.68 AP 00010041 01/09/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 155.16 0.00 155.16 AP 00010042 01/09/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 17,010.77 0.00 17,010.77 AP 00010043 01/15/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 22,257.07 0.00 22,257.07 AP 00010044 01/15/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 137,128.45 0.00 137,128.45 AP 00010045 01/15/2020 EDF TRADING NORTH AMERICA LLC 50,050.00 0.00 50,050.00 AP 00010046 01/15/2020 MOFFATT & NICHOL 382,425.62 0.00 382,425.62 AP 00010047 01/15/2020 RCCEA 1,842.75 0.00 1,842.75 AP 00010048 01/15/2020 RCPFA 11,141.30 0.00 11,141.30 AP 00010049 01/15/2020 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00010050 01/15/2020 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 357.69 0.00 357.69 AP 00010051 01/16/2020 ABC LOCKSMITHS 626.58 0.00 626.58 AP 00010052 01/16/2020 AIRGAS USA LLC 302.46 0.00 302.46 AP 00010053 01/16/2020 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 1,574.63 0.00 1,574.63 AP 00010054 01/16/2020 BRODART BOOKS 39,774.53 0.00 39,774.53 AP 00010055 01/16/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 594.92 0.00 594.92 AP 00010056 01/16/2020 CRAFCOINC 1,876.88 0.00 1,876.88 AP 00010057 01/16/2020 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 0.00 925.00 925.00 AP 00010058 01/16/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 139.03 0.00 139.03 AP 00010059 01/16/2020 EMCOR SERVICES 484.00 10,382.00 10,866.00 *** AP 00010060 01/16/2020 HOSE MAN INC 137.40 0.00 137.40 AP 00010061 01/16/2020 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 2,692.82 2,692.82 AP 00010062 01/16/2020 MIRION TECHNOLOGIES GDS INC 667.93 0.00 667.93 AP 00010065 01/16/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 8,595.47 914.16 9,509.63 *** AP 00010066 01/16/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 387.90 38.79 426.69 *** AP 00010067 01/16/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 698.70 0.00 698.70 AP 00010068 01/16/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 4,237.12 0.00 4,237.12 AP 00010069 01/16/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 1,794.99 0.00 1,794.99 AP 00010070 01/16/2020 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 719.35 0.00 719.35 AP 00010071 01/16/2020 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 48.49 0.00 48.49 AP 00010072 01/16/2020 VISTA PAINT 1,478.39 0.00 1,478.39 AP 00010073 01/22/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 9,413.84 0.00 9,413.84 AP 00010074 01/22/2020 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 1,074.12 0.00 1,074.12 AP 00010075 01/22/2020 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 329.72 0.00 329.72 AP 00010076 01/23/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1,681.97 0.00 1,681.97 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010077 01/23/2020 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 631.18 0.00 631.18 AP 00010078 01/23/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 49.39 0.00 49.39 AP 00010079 01/23/2020 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 5,826.62 5,826.62 AP 00010080 01/23/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 456.58 0.00 456.58 AP 00010081 01/23/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 898.70 148.35 1,047.05 *** AP 00010082 01/23/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 38.79 232.74 271.53 *** AP 00010083 01/23/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 588.19 0.00 588.19 AP 00010084 01/23/2020 SUNRISE FORD 45.18 0.00 45.18 AP 00010085 01/28/2020 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010086 01/28/2020 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010087 01/28/2020 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00010088 01/28/2020 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010089 01/28/2020 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010090 01/28/2020 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010091 01/28/2020 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00010092 01/28/2020 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,735.57 1,735.57 AP 00010093 01/28/2020 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010094 01/28/2020 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010095 01/28/2020 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010096 01/28/2020 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010097 01/28/2020 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010098 01/28/2020 COX, KARL 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010099 01/28/2020 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010100 01/28/2020 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010101 01/28/2020 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010102 01/28/2020 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00010103 01/28/2020 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010104 01/28/2020 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00010105 01/28/2020 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010106 01/28/2020 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010107 01/28/2020 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010108 01/28/2020 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010109 01/28/2020 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010110 01/28/2020 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010111 01/28/2020 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00010112 01/28/2020 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010113 01/28/2020 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010114 01/28/2020 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010115 01/28/2020 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010116 01/28/2020 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 948.67 948.67 AP 00010117 01/28/2020 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,487.34 1,487.34 AP 00010118 01/28/2020 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010119 01/28/2020 LONGO, JOE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010120 01/28/2020 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010121 01/28/2020 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010122 01/28/2020 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010123 01/28/2020 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 630.56 630.56 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 53 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010124 01/28/2020 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010125 01/28/2020 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010126 01/28/2020 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,792.73 1,792.73 AP 00010127 01/28/2020 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010128 01/28/2020 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010129 01/28/2020 NEE, RON 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00010130 01/28/2020 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010131 01/28/2020 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,281.58 1,281.58 AP 00010132 01/28/2020 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 563.78 563.78 AP 00010133 01/28/2020 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 854.52 854.52 AP 00010134 01/28/2020 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010135 01/28/2020 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010136 01/28/2020 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010137 01/28/2020 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010138 01/28/2020 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010139 01/28/2020 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010140 01/28/2020 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 2,154.28 2,154.28 AP 00010141 01/28/2020 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010142 01/28/2020 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00010143 01/28/2020 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010144 01/28/2020 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,975.24 1,975.24 AP 00010145 01/28/2020 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010146 01/28/2020 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010147 01/28/2020 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010148 01/28/2020 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010149 01/28/2020 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00010150 01/29/2020 BALANCE 4 LIFE FITNESS 4 WELLNESS INC 294.00 0.00 294.00 AP 00010151 01/29/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 23,785.01 0.00 23,785.01 AP 00010152 01/29/2020 RCCEA 1,981.00 0.00 1,981.00 AP 00010153 01/29/2020 RCPFA 11,058.47 0.00 11,058.47 AP 00010154 01/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00010155 01/30/2020 ABC LOCKSMITHS 2,402.20 0.00 2,402.20 AP 00010156 01/30/2020 AIRGAS USA LLC 1,718.73 341.11 2,059.84 *** AP 00010157 01/30/2020 CALSENSE 4,361.72 0.00 4,361.72 AP 00010158 01/30/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 181.86 0.00 181.86 AP 00010159 01/30/2020 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 594.26 0.00 594.26 AP 00010160 01/30/2020 DEMCOINC 308.79 0.00 308.79 AP 00010161 01/30/2020 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 2,221.67 340.56 2,562.23 *** AP 00010162 01/30/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 401.10 0.00 401.10 AP 00010163 01/30/2020 EMCOR SERVICES 27,907.59 0.00 27,907.59 AP 00010164 01/30/2020 HOSE MAN INC 752.59 59.89 812.48 *** AP 00010165 01/30/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 290.39 0.00 290.39 AP 00010166 01/30/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 2,260.31 0.00 2,260.31 AP 00010167 01/30/2020 SAFETY KLEEN SYSTEMS INC 0.00 210.11 210.11 AP 00010168 01/30/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 39,655.10 0.00 39,655.10 AP 00010169 01/30/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 2,654.07 0.00 2,654.07 AP 00010170 01/30/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 527.00 0.00 527.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 54 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010171 01/30/2020 STABILIZER SOLUTIONS INC 3,062.78 0.00 3,062.78 AP 00010172 01/30/2020 SUNRISE FORD 257.64 0.00 257.64 AP 00010173 01/30/2020 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 263.34 0.00 263.34 AP 00010174 01/30/2020 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 33.92 0.00 33.92 AP 00010175 01/30/2020 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 223.05 0.00 223.05 AP 00010176 01/30/2020 VISTA PAINT 2,086.77 0.00 2,086.77 AP 00010177 02/05/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 11,128.53 0.00 11,128.53 AP 00010178 02/05/2020 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010179 02/05/2020 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 529.08 0.00 529.08 AP 00010180 02/05/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 32.00 0.00 32.00 AP 00010181 02/06/2020 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 617.50 0.00 617.50 AP 00010182 02/06/2020 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 124.44 124.44 AP 00010183 02/06/2020 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC 0.00 518.85 518.85 AP 00010184 02/06/2020 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. 7,602.84 0.00 7,602.84 AP 00010185 02/06/2020 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 4,106.42 4,106.42 AP 00010186 02/06/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 776.90 0.00 776.90 AP 00010187 02/06/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 3,432.79 718.99 4,151.78 *** AP 00010188 02/06/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 38.79 38.79 77.58 *** AP 00010189 02/06/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 2,893.44 0.00 2,893.44 AP 00010190 02/06/2020 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 331.00 0.00 331.00 AP 00406575 01/08/2020 A & I REPROGRAPHICS 932.04 0.00 932.04 AP 00406576 01/08/2020 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 365.70 0.00 365.70 AP 00406577 01/08/2020 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES INC 665.76 0.00 665.76 AP 00406578 01/08/2020 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 961.00 0.00 961.00 AP 00406579 01/08/2020 ADVANCED EQUIPMENT CORP 44,963.50 0.00 44,963.50 AP 00406580 01/08/2020 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC 170.25 0.00 170.25 AP 00406581 01/08/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00406582 01/08/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 24.24 0.00 24.24 AP 00406583 01/08/2020 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 397.59 0.00 397.59 AP 00406584 01/08/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 30,465.00 0.00 30,465.00 AP 00406585 01/08/2020 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 67.26 0.00 67.26 AP 00406586 01/08/2020 AVNISH LLC 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00406587 01/08/2020 BABCOCK LABORATORIES INC 131.00 0.00 131.00 AP 00406588 01/08/2020 BCC CONTRACTING INC 5,500.00 0.00 5,500.00 AP 00406589 01/08/2020 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 11.04 11.04 AP 00406590 01/08/2020 BLACK, CATHERINE 192.50 0.00 192.50 AP 00406591 01/08/2020 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE P.C. 240.54 0.00 240.54 AP 00406592 01/08/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 3,210.80 0.00 3,210.80 AP 00406593 01/08/2020 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 1,727.15 0.00 1,727.15 AP 00406594 01/08/2020 C V W D 45.48 0.00 45.48 AP 00406595 01/08/2020 C V W D 160.07 294.83 454.90 *** AP 00406599 01/08/2020 C V W D 31,243.16 397.60 31,640.76 *** AP 00406600 01/08/2020 CA LLC - DBA ALTA LAGUNA MHP 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00406601 01/08/2020 CALAMP WIRELESS NETWORKS CORPORATION 61,677.60 9,660.00 71,337.60 *** AP 00406602 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA ENERGY SAVERS 9.00 0.00 9.00 AP 00406603 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11 AP 00406604 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire AP 00406605 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 30.00 0.00 AP 00406606 01/08/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 7.22 0.00 AP 00406607 01/08/2020 CALIN, ANGELA 866.00 0.00 AP 00406608 01/08/2020 CALIX INC. 2,495.04 0.00 AP 00406609 01/08/2020 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 700.00 0.00 AP 00406610 01/08/2020 CHANGELAB SOLUTIONS 7,080.00 0.00 AP 00406611 01/08/2020 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 474.35 0.00 AP 00406612 01/08/2020 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 8,039.76 6,365.18 AP 00406613 01/08/2020 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 778.00 0.00 AP 00406614 01/08/2020 COOK, JANA 42.00 0.00 AP 00406615 01/08/2020 CUT N DRY RESTORATION 801.09 0.00 AP 00406616 01/08/2020 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 3,014.86 0.00 AP 00406617 01/08/2020 D M CONTRACTING INC 93,490.69 0.00 AP 00406618 01/08/2020 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 0.00 8,703.75 AP 00406619 01/08/2020 DATA TICKET INC 9,119.53 0.00 AP 00406620 01/08/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 343.00 0.00 AP 00406621 01/08/2020 DL IMAGING 1,985.05 0.00 AP 00406622 01/08/2020 ECOHERO SHOW LLC, THE 921.46 0.00 AP 00406623 01/08/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 3,965.00 0.00 AP 00406624 01/08/2020 EMPIRE LAKES HOLDING COMPANY LLC 4.00 0.00 AP 00406625 01/08/2020 ESPINOZA, ALONDRA 97.00 0.00 AP 00406626 01/08/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.20 0.00 AP 00406627 01/08/2020 FEHR AND PEERS 7,985.00 0.00 AP 00406628 01/08/2020 FIRE APPARATUS SOLUTIONS 0.00 381.58 AP 00406629 01/08/2020 FLEET SERVICES INC. 0.00 148.96 AP 00406630 01/08/2020 FLEETPRIDE 0.00 110.23 AP 00406631 01/08/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,763.74 0.00 AP 00406632 01/08/2020 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 1,214.03 AP 00406634 01/08/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,111.13 688.87 AP 00406635 01/08/2020 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 1,210.00 0.00 AP 00406636 01/08/2020 G & M BUSINESS INTERIORS 41.65 0.00 AP 00406637 01/08/2020 GONSALVES AND SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 AP 00406638 01/08/2020 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 840.00 0.00 AP 00406639 01/08/2020 GOVERNMENTJOBS.COM INC 814.00 0.00 AP 00406640 01/08/2020 GRAINGER 1,125.10 655.20 AP 00406641 01/08/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,108.76 0.00 AP 00406642 01/08/2020 GRIFFIN, ALESSANDRA 0.00 74.96 AP 00406643 01/08/2020 GROUP C MEDIA INC 1,850.00 0.00 AP 00406644 01/08/2020 GROVES ON FOOTHILL, THE 200.00 0.00 AP 00406645 01/08/2020 HALL, SUZANNE 394.00 0.00 AP 00406646 01/08/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 1,386.00 0.00 AP 00406647 01/08/2020 HARVEY, DOUGLAS REED 192.50 0.00 AP 00406648 01/08/2020 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 1,149.00 0.00 AP 00406649 01/08/2020 HI -WAY SAFETY INC 87.60 0.00 AP 00406650 01/08/2020 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 500.00 0.00 AP 00406651 01/08/2020 HONG, ZHANG YU 68.22 0.00 AP 00406652 01/08/2020 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 1,000.00 0.00 Amount 30.00 7.22 866.00 2,495.04 700.00 7,080.00 474.35 14,404.94 778.00 42.00 801.09 3,014.86 93,490.69 8,703.75 9,119.53 343.00 1,985.05 921.46 3,965.00 4.00 97.00 21.20 7,985.00 381.58 148.96 110.23 1,763.74 1,214.03 3,800.00 1,210.00 41.65 3,000.00 *** *** 840.00 814.00 1,780.30 *** 1,108.76 74.96 1,850.00 200.00 394.00 1,386.00 192.50 1,149.00 87.60 500.00 68.22 1,000.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406653 01/08/2020 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 780.00 0.00 780.00 AP 00406654 01/08/2020 IATSE NATIONAL BENEFITS FUNDS 936.00 0.00 936.00 AP 00406655 01/08/2020 IATSE NATIONAL BENEFITS FUNDS 480.00 0.00 480.00 AP 00406656 01/08/2020 INDUSTRIAL HARDWARE AND SERVICE CO 1,594.70 0.00 1,594.70 AP 00406657 01/08/2020 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00406658 01/08/2020 INLAND TOPSOIL MIXES 646.50 0.00 646.50 AP 00406659 01/08/2020 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00406660 01/08/2020 KAUFLIN, JUSTIN DANIEL 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 AP 00406661 01/08/2020 KINDRED CORPORATION 1,528.45 0.00 1,528.45 AP 00406662 01/08/2020 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 6,195.00 0.00 6,195.00 AP 00406663 01/08/2020 LEONG, JOHN 62.94 0.00 62.94 AP 00406664 01/08/2020 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,432.69 0.00 5,432.69 AP 00406665 01/08/2020 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 1,875.00 0.00 1,875.00 AP 00406666 01/08/2020 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 3,465.00 0.00 3,465.00 AP 00406667 01/08/2020 MAIN STREET SIGNS 764.59 0.00 764.59 AP 00406669 01/08/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 125,745.53 0.00 125,745.53 AP 00406670 01/08/2020 MG PETROLEUM INC 288.00 0.00 288.00 AP 00406671 01/08/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 212.34 0.00 212.34 AP 00406672 01/08/2020 MORRIS, DOUG 16,472.00 0.00 16,472.00 AP 00406673 01/08/2020 MUSIC AND THEATRE COMPANY LLC, THE 4,900.00 0.00 4,900.00 AP 00406674 01/08/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3.16 656.85 660.01 *** AP 00406675 01/08/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 746.50 40.00 786.50 *** AP 00406676 01/08/2020 OCLC INC 59.68 0.00 59.68 AP 00406677 01/08/2020 ONTRAC 42.98 0.00 42.98 AP 00406678 01/08/2020 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 5,242.38 0.00 5,242.38 AP 00406679 01/08/2020 PARKWAY CONSTRUCTION 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 AP 00406680 01/08/2020 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00406681 01/08/2020 PIP PRINTING 37.71 0.00 37.71 AP 00406682 01/08/2020 PORAC 192.00 0.00 192.00 AP 00406683 01/08/2020 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00406684 01/08/2020 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00406685 01/08/2020 RADIUS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 558.44 0.00 558.44 AP 00406686 01/08/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 507.61 0.00 507.61 AP 00406687 01/08/2020 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 54.43 0.00 54.43 AP 00406688 01/08/2020 RECREATION RESULTS 3,850.00 0.00 3,850.00 AP 00406689 01/08/2020 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 187.74 0.00 187.74 AP 00406690 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,360.00 0.00 3,360.00 AP 00406691 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,920.00 0.00 3,920.00 AP 00406692 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,920.00 0.00 3,920.00 AP 00406693 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,208.50 0.00 3,208.50 AP 00406694 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,743.25 0.00 3,743.25 AP 00406695 01/08/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,743.25 0.00 3,743.25 AP 00406696 01/08/2020 RIGHT OF WAY INC 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00406697 01/08/2020 ROMO PLANNING GROUP INC 4,160.00 0.00 4,160.00 AP 00406698 01/08/2020 ROSEBURROUGH TOOLS INC 1,077.11 0.00 1,077.11 AP 00406699 01/08/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 1,025.00 0.00 1,025.00 AP 00406700 01/08/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 15,275.00 0.00 15,275.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406701 01/08/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 2,600.00 0.00 2,600.00 AP 00406702 01/08/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 2,475.00 0.00 2,475.00 AP 00406703 01/08/2020 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 212.48 0.00 212.48 AP 00406704 01/08/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 21,932.23 0.00 21,932.23 AP 00406705 01/08/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 60,257.07 0.00 60,257.07 AP 00406706 01/08/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 17,218.00 0.00 17,218.00 AP 00406707 01/08/2020 SBPEA 2,601.45 0.00 2,601.45 AP 00406708 01/08/2020 SC FUELS 0.00 15,691.92 15,691.92 AP 00406709 01/08/2020 SCHWARTZ, STEPHANIE KURLEY 866.00 0.00 866.00 AP 00406710 01/08/2020 SCL 0.00 1,301.04 1,301.04 AP 00406711 01/08/2020 SEALS, KATIE 6.49 0.00 6.49 AP 00406712 01/08/2020 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00406713 01/08/2020 SHRED PROS 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00406714 01/08/2020 SINNETT CONSULTING SERVICES INC 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00406715 01/08/2020 SMITH, JAYMI LEE 866.00 0.00 866.00 AP 00406721 01/08/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 16,737.88 423.36 17,161.24 *** AP 00406722 01/08/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 31.27 0.00 31.27 AP 00406723 01/08/2020 SPIKES, BRIANNA 220.00 0.00 220.00 AP 00406724 01/08/2020 SULLIVAN, CONNOR 192.50 0.00 192.50 AP 00406725 01/08/2020 SWEET HONEY IN THE ROCK INC 4,426.80 0.00 4,426.80 AP 00406726 01/08/2020 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00406727 01/08/2020 TAYLOR, HEATHER 192.50 0.00 192.50 AP 00406728 01/08/2020 TETRA TECH INC 8,769.00 0.00 8,769.00 AP 00406729 01/08/2020 TRI POINTE HOMES 17,368.00 0.00 17,368.00 AP 00406730 01/08/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 16,483.62 0.00 16,483.62 AP 00406731 01/08/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,121.79 0.00 1,121.79 AP 00406732 01/08/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00406733 01/08/2020 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARE FUNDS 702.00 0.00 702.00 AP 00406734 01/08/2020 UNITED SCENIC ARTISTS PENSION & WELFARE FUNDS 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00406735 01/08/2020 UNITED WAY 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00406736 01/08/2020 UPS 58.00 0.00 58.00 AP 00406737 01/08/2020 URBAN ARENA 2,740.00 0.00 2,740.00 AP 00406738 01/08/2020 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00406739 01/08/2020 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 1,412.50 0.00 1,412.50 AP 00406740 01/08/2020 WORLD BOOK INC 2,152.86 0.00 2,152.86 AP 00406741 01/15/2020 ABM BUSINESS MACHINES INC 665.76 0.00 665.76 AP 00406742 01/15/2020 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 0.00 140.30 140.30 AP 00406743 01/15/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00406744 01/15/2020 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 4,104.04 4,104.04 AP 00406745 01/15/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 48.48 0.00 48.48 AP 00406746 01/15/2020 ANUFORO, CHINWE 55.90 0.00 55.90 AP 00406747 01/15/2020 ARELLANO, ANGELA 5.80 0.00 5.80 AP 00406748 01/15/2020 ARK HOMES FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY 432.27 0.00 432.27 AP 00406749 01/15/2020 BENEFIT FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP 9,375.00 0.00 9,375.00 AP 00406750 01/15/2020 BILL & WAGS INC 0.00 632.81 632.81 AP 00406751 01/15/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 8,740.98 8,740.98 AP 00406752 01/15/2020 BUILDING BRIDGES FFA 500.00 0.00 500.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 58 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406753 01/15/2020 BW PRINTWORKS 0.00 130.89 130.89 AP 00406754 01/15/2020 C V W D 287.67 0.00 287.67 AP 00406763 01/15/2020 C V W D 84,174.28 664.05 84,838.33 *** AP 00406764 01/15/2020 CA EMERGENCY SERVICES ASSOCIATION 0.00 85.00 85.00 AP 00406765 01/15/2020 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 328.96 0.00 328.96 AP 00406766 01/15/2020 CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION 5,250.00 0.00 5,250.00 AP 00406767 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC INFO OFFICIALS 0.00 45.00 45.00 AP 00406768 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA BOX II 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00406769 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS COMMISSION 1,618.20 0.00 1,618.20 AP 00406770 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT 1,150.60 0.00 1,150.60 AP 00406771 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11 AP 00406772 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 8.44 AP 00406773 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 4,830.00 0.00 4,830.00 AP 00406774 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 7.22 0.00 7.22 AP 00406775 01/15/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00406776 01/15/2020 CARTER, WHITNEY NICOLE 210.00 0.00 210.00 AP 00406777 01/15/2020 CASCADE FIRE EQUIPMENT 0.00 3,541.96 3,541.96 AP 00406778 01/15/2020 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 768.13 0.00 768.13 AP 00406779 01/15/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 1,362.28 1,362.28 AP 00406780 01/15/2020 COMEAU, CHAD 0.00 275.00 275.00 AP 00406781 01/15/2020 CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS LLC 257.50 0.00 257.50 AP 00406782 01/15/2020 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 62.70 0.00 62.70 AP 00406783 01/15/2020 CROWN POINTE INVESTIGATIONS LLC 0.00 9,102.50 9,102.50 AP 00406784 01/15/2020 D'ALESIO GROUP INC 0.00 394.85 394.85 AP 00406785 01/15/2020 DAISY IT 425.29 0.00 425.29 AP 00406786 01/15/2020 DATA TICKET INC 6,733.24 0.00 6,733.24 AP 00406787 01/15/2020 DECESARE, CRAIG 18.15 0.00 18.15 AP 00406788 01/15/2020 DELL MARKETING LP 38,254.83 0.00 38,254.83 AP 00406789 01/15/2020 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1,279.34 0.00 1,279.34 AP 00406790 01/15/2020 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 41,977.08 0.00 41,977.08 AP 00406791 01/15/2020 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION 10,285.97 0.00 10,285.97 AP 00406792 01/15/2020 DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY 16,710.00 0.00 16,710.00 AP 00406793 01/15/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 0.00 210.00 210.00 AP 00406794 01/15/2020 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 127.25 0.00 127.25 AP 00406795 01/15/2020 DIRECTV 171.99 0.00 171.99 AP 00406796 01/15/2020 EDWARDS, ERIKA 6.79 0.00 6.79 AP 00406797 01/15/2020 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 187,183.54 0.00 187,183.54 AP 00406798 01/15/2020 ENGLAND, KADESHA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00406799 01/15/2020 ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION 0.00 78,491.25 78,491.25 AP 00406800 01/15/2020 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00406801 01/15/2020 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00406802 01/15/2020 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 2,626.19 2,626.19 AP 00406803 01/15/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 29.32 0.00 29.32 AP 00406804 01/15/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.05 0.00 21.05 AP 00406805 01/15/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 33.28 0.00 33.28 AP 00406806 01/15/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 21.18 0.00 21.18 AP 00406807 01/15/2020 FIRE APPARATUS SOLUTIONS 0.00 3,212.92 3,212.92 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406808 01/15/2020 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 74.82 74.82 AP 00406809 01/15/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,436.04 0.00 3,436.04 AP 00406810 01/15/2020 GILKEY, JOHN A 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00406811 01/15/2020 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 960.00 0.00 960.00 AP 00406812 01/15/2020 GLOBALSTAR USA 174.85 0.00 174.85 AP 00406813 01/15/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 98,749.00 1,381.00 100,130.00 *** AP 00406814 01/15/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 100,059.00 1,381.00 101,440.00 *** AP 00406815 01/15/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 99,713.00 1,114.00 100,827.00 *** AP 00406816 01/15/2020 GOMEZ, CRISTINA 52.25 0.00 52.25 AP 00406817 01/15/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 2,207.53 0.00 2,207.53 AP 00406818 01/15/2020 GRIFFIN, ALESSANDRA 0.00 33.40 33.40 AP 00406819 01/15/2020 HIGBEE & ASSOCIATES 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00406820 01/15/2020 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 14,538.71 14,538.71 AP 00406821 01/15/2020 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 688.86 0.00 688.86 AP 00406822 01/15/2020 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 151.71 151.71 AP 00406823 01/15/2020 HUDSON, MARIE 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00406824 01/15/2020 ICE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA LLC 282.42 0.00 282.42 AP 00406825 01/15/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 421.49 0.00 421.49 AP 00406826 01/15/2020 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 0.00 330.75 330.75 AP 00406827 01/15/2020 INNERLINE ENGINEERING INC 2,080.75 0.00 2,080.75 AP 00406828 01/15/2020 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 328.19 0.00 328.19 AP 00406829 01/15/2020 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 630.08 0.00 630.08 AP 00406830 01/15/2020 JEEP CHRYSLER OF ONTARIO INC 417.77 0.00 417.77 AP 00406831 01/15/2020 JIMENEZ, LORENA 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00406832 01/15/2020 K -K WOODWORKING 0.00 564.44 564.44 AP 00406833 01/15/2020 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 237,645.48 0.00 237,645.48 AP 00406834 01/15/2020 KAUFLIN, JUSTIN DANIEL 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00406835 01/15/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 0.00 16,013.00 16,013.00 AP 00406836 01/15/2020 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 10,947.21 0.00 10,947.21 AP 00406837 01/15/2020 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 3,553.44 0.00 3,553.44 AP 00406839 01/15/2020 LOWES COMPANIES INC. 6,287.58 2,513.09 8,800.67 *** AP 00406840 01/15/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 5,318.55 0.00 5,318.55 AP 00406841 01/15/2020 MACMILLIAN, BROOK 14.77 0.00 14.77 AP 00406842 01/15/2020 MADD 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00406843 01/15/2020 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 15,750.00 0.00 15,750.00 AP 00406844 01/15/2020 MAIN STREET SIGNS 463.16 0.00 463.16 AP 00406845 01/15/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 55,595.13 1,410.69 57,005.82 *** AP 00406846 01/15/2020 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 245.02 0.00 245.02 AP 00406847 01/15/2020 MARLINK SA INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00406848 01/15/2020 MATLOCK DESIGN BUILD INC 871.00 0.00 871.00 AP 00406849 01/15/2020 MCI 69.36 0.00 69.36 AP 00406850 01/15/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 170.76 0.00 170.76 AP 00406851 01/15/2020 MCMILLAN, TOM 197.00 0.00 197.00 AP 00406852 01/15/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 272.28 0.00 272.28 AP 00406853 01/15/2020 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 56.00 0.00 56.00 AP 00406854 01/15/2020 MITY LITE INC. 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00406855 01/15/2020 MMASC 90.00 0.00 90.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 60 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406856 01/15/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 139.96 0.00 139.96 AP 00406857 01/15/2020 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 20.00 20.00 AP 00406858 01/15/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 134.28 134.28 AP 00406859 01/15/2020 NEIGHBORS, ZACK 63.80 0.00 63.80 AP 00406860 01/15/2020 NEOPOST USA INC 540.46 0.00 540.46 AP 00406861 01/15/2020 NEW COLOR PRINTING 187.49 0.00 187.49 AP 00406862 01/15/2020 O'BRIEN, JAMES 0.00 564.00 564.00 AP 00406863 01/15/2020 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 620.31 0.00 620.31 AP 00406864 01/15/2020 ONTRAC 65.91 0.00 65.91 AP 00406865 01/15/2020 OPORTO III, GILBERTO 48.61 0.00 48.61 AP 00406866 01/15/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00406867 01/15/2020 P.A. DOUGLAS & ASSOCIATES INC 2,595.00 0.00 2,595.00 AP 00406868 01/15/2020 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 15,158.00 0.00 15,158.00 AP 00406869 01/15/2020 PERSITZA, ADAM 0.00 899.00 899.00 AP 00406870 01/15/2020 PERSONAL EXPOSURE REPORTING 0.00 850.00 850.00 AP 00406871 01/15/2020 PETES ROAD SERVICE INC 143.75 0.00 143.75 AP 00406872 01/15/2020 PH&S PRODUCTS LLC 0.00 2,300.00 2,300.00 AP 00406873 01/15/2020 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00406874 01/15/2020 QUINN COMPANY 0.00 2,913.80 2,913.80 AP 00406875 01/15/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 88.74 0.00 88.74 AP 00406876 01/15/2020 RADIUS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 558.44 0.00 558.44 AP 00406877 01/15/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 40.14 0.00 40.14 AP 00406878 01/15/2020 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 0.00 265.00 265.00 AP 00406879 01/15/2020 REHABWEST INC 313.50 0.00 313.50 AP 00406880 01/15/2020 ROSE BRAND WIPERS INC 565.41 0.00 565.41 AP 00406881 01/15/2020 ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00406882 01/15/2020 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 545.00 545.00 AP 00406883 01/15/2020 SAMS CLUB/SYNCHRONY BANK 101.35 0.00 101.35 AP 00406884 01/15/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 2,797.38 0.00 2,797.38 AP 00406885 01/15/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 0.00 13,325.76 13,325.76 AP 00406886 01/15/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 26.00 0.00 26.00 AP 00406887 01/15/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE DISTRICT 0.00 860.74 860.74 AP 00406888 01/15/2020 SBPEA 2,573.33 0.00 2,573.33 AP 00406889 01/15/2020 SC FUELS 25,231.29 0.00 25,231.29 AP 00406890 01/15/2020 SC FUELS 0.00 13,382.58 13,382.58 AP 00406891 01/15/2020 SECC CORP 3,665.00 0.00 3,665.00 AP 00406892 01/15/2020 SESAC INC 2,179.00 0.00 2,179.00 AP 00406893 01/15/2020 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 400.35 181.20 581.55 *** AP 00406894 01/15/2020 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00406895 01/15/2020 SHRED PROS 1,121.00 0.00 1,121.00 AP 00406896 01/15/2020 SIDEPATH INC 19,500.00 0.00 19,500.00 AP 00406897 01/15/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 272,261.48 0.00 272,261.48 AP 00406898 01/15/2020 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 39.13 0.00 39.13 AP 00406899 01/15/2020 SMITH, THERESE 56.26 0.00 56.26 AP 00406909 01/15/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 33,113.32 3,546.75 36,660.07 *** AP 00406910 01/15/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 373.73 0.00 373.73 AP 00406911 01/15/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 189.01 0.00 189.01 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 61 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406912 01/15/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,484.63 0.00 2,484.63 AP 00406913 01/15/2020 SPECIALIZED CARE FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00406914 01/15/2020 SPRINGSHARE LLC 899.00 0.00 899.00 AP 00406915 01/15/2020 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,611.74 0.00 3,611.74 AP 00406916 01/15/2020 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 11,852.70 0.00 11,852.70 AP 00406917 01/15/2020 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 11,852.70 0.00 11,852.70 AP 00406918 01/15/2020 SWEET HONEY IN THE ROCK INC 17,707.20 0.00 17,707.20 AP 00406919 01/15/2020 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 3,900.00 3,900.00 AP 00406920 01/15/2020 TIREHUB LLC 0.00 92.13 92.13 AP 00406921 01/15/2020 TRINITY EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1,084.15 0.00 1,084.15 AP 00406922 01/15/2020 ULINE 859.85 0.00 859.85 AP 00406923 01/15/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 281.34 0.00 281.34 AP 00406924 01/15/2020 UNITED WAY 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00406925 01/15/2020 UPS 231.90 0.00 231.90 AP 00406926 01/15/2020 UTILIQUEST 3,770.19 0.00 3,770.19 AP 00406927 01/15/2020 VENEKLASEN ASSOCIATES INC 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 AP 00406932 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,665.66 0.00 5,665.66 AP 00406933 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 268.55 0.00 268.55 AP 00406934 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 60.12 0.00 60.12 AP 00406935 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 80.41 0.00 80.41 AP 00406936 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 421.11 0.00 421.11 AP 00406937 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,104.74 5,104.74 AP 00406938 01/15/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 4,447.33 0.00 4,447.33 AP 00406939 01/15/2020 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS 29,770.00 0.00 29,770.00 AP 00406940 01/15/2020 VIGILANT SOLUTIONS 36,166.64 0.00 36,166.64 AP 00406941 01/15/2020 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 2,475.00 0.00 2,475.00 AP 00406942 01/15/2020 VOHNE LICHE KENNELS INC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00406943 01/15/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 693.29 0.00 693.29 AP 00406944 01/15/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 3,154.98 1,689.88 4,844.86 *** AP 00406945 01/15/2020 WELLS, JUDITH 35.96 0.00 35.96 AP 00406946 01/15/2020 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.00 AP 00406947 01/15/2020 WHITTIER FERTILIZER 5,021.15 0.00 5,021.15 AP 00406948 01/15/2020 WILSON, GENERA 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00406949 01/15/2020 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00406950 01/15/2020 XEROX CORPORATION 1,118.45 0.00 1,118.45 AP 00406951 01/15/2020 XEROX CORPORATION 1,256.38 0.00 1,256.38 AP 00406952 01/15/2020 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 298.38 0.00 298.38 AP 00406953 01/15/2020 YERO, ART 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00406954 01/22/2020 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,964.35 0.00 5,964.35 AP 00406955 01/22/2020 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 21,908.24 0.00 21,908.24 AP 00406956 01/22/2020 ACCURATE CALIFORNIA LLC 117.19 0.00 117.19 AP 00406957 01/22/2020 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 AP 00406958 01/22/2020 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC 1,692.53 0.00 1,692.53 AP 00406959 01/22/2020 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00406960 01/22/2020 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00406961 01/22/2020 ADONIS, DARLENE 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00406962 01/22/2020 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT 864.50 0.00 864.50 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 62 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406963 01/22/2020 ADVANCED UTILITY SYSTEMS CORP 55,356.47 0.00 55,356.47 AP 00406964 01/22/2020 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC 942.17 0.00 942.17 AP 00406965 01/22/2020 AHERN RENTALS 31,188.24 0.00 31,188.24 AP 00406966 01/22/2020 ALL WELDING 1,131.38 0.00 1,131.38 AP 00406967 01/22/2020 ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION 6,900.00 0.00 6,900.00 AP 00406968 01/22/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 48.48 0.00 48.48 AP 00406969 01/22/2020 ALTUM GROUP, THE 118.50 0.00 118.50 AP 00406970 01/22/2020 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 5,967.00 0.00 5,967.00 AP 00406971 01/22/2020 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00406972 01/22/2020 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 21,118.75 0.00 21,118.75 AP 00406973 01/22/2020 ASSI SECURITY 1,060.00 0.00 1,060.00 AP 00406974 01/22/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 8,406.00 0.00 8,406.00 AP 00406975 01/22/2020 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 75.96 0.00 75.96 AP 00406976 01/22/2020 AUTOLIFT SERVICES INC 853.57 0.00 853.57 AP 00406977 01/22/2020 BABCOCK LABORATORIES INC 931.00 0.00 931.00 AP 00406978 01/22/2020 BASELINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00406979 01/22/2020 BAVARSAD, SHAHIN ADAM 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00406980 01/22/2020 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 115.55 0.00 115.55 AP 00406981 01/22/2020 BLACKSMITH SHOP, THE 4,991.63 0.00 4,991.63 AP 00406982 01/22/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 1,681.44 1,681.44 AP 00406983 01/22/2020 BRIDGEALL LIBRARIES LIMITED 16,000.00 0.00 16,000.00 AP 00406984 01/22/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 109,861.68 0.00 109,861.68 AP 00406985 01/22/2020 BURGESON'S HEATING AND AIR 239.52 0.00 239.52 AP 00406987 01/22/2020 C V W D 6,181.13 654.61 6,835.74 *** AP 00406988 01/22/2020 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 AP 00406989 01/22/2020 CALABRIA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00406990 01/22/2020 CALIFORNIA DPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 698.56 1,380.92 2,079.48 *** AP 00406991 01/22/2020 CALIFORNIA STATE SHERIFFS' ASSOC FOUNDATION 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00406992 01/22/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 113.00 0.00 113.00 AP 00406993 01/22/2020 CASTANEDA, MIGUEL 1,979.94 0.00 1,979.94 AP 00406994 01/22/2020 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 0.00 1,603.90 1,603.90 AP 00406995 01/22/2020 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 271.49 0.00 271.49 AP 00406996 01/22/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,270.56 320.84 2,591.40 *** AP 00406997 01/22/2020 CLARKE PLUMBING SPECIALTIES INC. 816.20 0.00 816.20 AP 00406998 01/22/2020 CLIMATEC LLC 15,613.00 0.00 15,613.00 AP 00406999 01/22/2020 COAST RECREATION INC 113.05 0.00 113.05 AP 00407000 01/22/2020 COMMERCIAL DOOR 2,223.36 0.00 2,223.36 AP 00407001 01/22/2020 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 10,761.28 1,040.87 11,802.15 *** AP 00407002 01/22/2020 CONTRERAS, EDNA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00407003 01/22/2020 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 200.52 0.00 200.52 AP 00407004 01/22/2020 CPRS 570.00 0.00 570.00 AP 00407005 01/22/2020 CPRS 145.00 0.00 145.00 AP 00407006 01/22/2020 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 1,080.00 0.00 1,080.00 AP 00407007 01/22/2020 D & D SERVICES INC. 903.00 0.00 903.00 AP 00407008 01/22/2020 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,896.94 0.00 2,896.94 AP 00407009 01/22/2020 DE VERA JR, RENATO 104.00 0.00 104.00 AP 00407010 01/22/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 392.00 0.00 392.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 12 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 63 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407011 01/22/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1,309.00 0.00 1,309.00 AP 00407012 01/22/2020 DIRECTV 85.79 0.00 85.79 AP 00407013 01/22/2020 DIRECTV 71.24 0.00 71.24 AP 00407014 01/22/2020 DOG WASTE DEPOT 465.40 0.00 465.40 AP 00407015 01/22/2020 ESPINOZA, ALBERTO 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00407016 01/22/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 27.62 0.00 27.62 AP 00407017 01/22/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 22.90 0.00 22.90 AP 00407018 01/22/2020 FIRST AID 2000 1,818.28 0.00 1,818.28 AP 00407019 01/22/2020 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00407020 01/22/2020 FLEMING'S STEAKHOUSE LLC 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00407021 01/22/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 7,151.87 0.00 7,151.87 AP 00407022 01/22/2020 FREEDOM FOREVER LLC 87.04 0.00 87.04 AP 00407023 01/22/2020 FRITTS FORD 130.00 0.00 130.00 AP 00407024 01/22/2020 FUEL SERV 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00407025 01/22/2020 GABRIEL, DEBRA 19.85 0.00 19.85 AP 00407026 01/22/2020 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 770.00 0.00 770.00 AP 00407027 01/22/2020 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 244.50 0.00 244.50 AP 00407028 01/22/2020 GILKEY, JOHN A 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00407029 01/22/2020 GOLDBERG, BRITNIE 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00407030 01/22/2020 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00407031 01/22/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 100,658.00 1,114.00 101,772.00 *** AP 00407032 01/22/2020 GRAINGER 552.07 108.97 661.04 *** AP 00407033 01/22/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 370.39 0.00 370.39 AP 00407034 01/22/2020 HAAKER EQUIPMENT CO 181.91 0.00 181.91 AP 00407035 01/22/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 330.00 0.00 330.00 AP 00407036 01/22/2020 HARGIS, ILANY G. 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00407037 01/22/2020 HARRIS, LEAH 0.00 214.00 214.00 AP 00407038 01/22/2020 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC. 239.68 0.00 239.68 AP 00407039 01/22/2020 HEARTSAVERS LLC 1,498.00 0.00 1,498.00 AP 00407040 01/22/2020 HI -WAY SAFETY INC 448.99 0.00 448.99 AP 00407041 01/22/2020 HILLS PET NUTRITION SALES INC 3,191.56 0.00 3,191.56 AP 00407042 01/22/2020 HMC ARCHITECTS 0.00 18,099.21 18,099.21 AP 00407043 01/22/2020 HOVEY, RICHARD 9.20 0.00 9.20 AP 00407044 01/22/2020 HUITT-ZOLLARS INC 2,675.00 0.00 2,675.00 AP 00407045 01/22/2020 HUITT-ZOLLARS INC 4,410.00 0.00 4,410.00 AP 00407046 01/22/2020 HULT, JACOB 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00407047 01/22/2020 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00407048 01/22/2020 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 1,955.52 0.00 1,955.52 AP 00407049 01/22/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 3,892.09 0.00 3,892.09 AP 00407050 01/22/2020 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00407051 01/22/2020 INLAND PRESORT & MAILING SERVICES 527.68 0.00 527.68 AP 00407052 01/22/2020 INTERNATIONAL COATINGS COMPANY INC 3,124.75 0.00 3,124.75 AP 00407053 01/22/2020 INTERVET INC 2,567.25 0.00 2,567.25 AP 00407054 01/22/2020 INYO NETWORKS 6,594.04 0.00 6,594.04 AP 00407055 01/22/2020 ITRON INC 5,997.84 0.00 5,997.84 AP 00407056 01/22/2020 JAHN, JOSHUA D 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00407057 01/22/2020 JIMENEZ, MICHELLE 140.00 0.00 140.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 13 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 64 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407058 01/22/2020 JOHNSON, NICHOLAS 0.00 554.00 554.00 AP 00407059 01/22/2020 K -K WOODWORKING 86.11 0.00 86.11 AP 00407060 01/22/2020 KINDRED CORPORATION 7,285.89 0.00 7,285.89 AP 00407061 01/22/2020 KWAPINSKI, SASHA 243.91 0.00 243.91 AP 00407062 01/22/2020 LAMP, JULIE 15.00 0.00 15.00 AP 00407063 01/22/2020 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00407064 01/22/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 91,899.12 4,900.85 96,799.97 *** AP 00407065 01/22/2020 MCALLISTER, WILLIAM 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00407066 01/22/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 292.00 0.00 292.00 AP 00407067 01/22/2020 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 252.00 2,532.00 2,784.00 *** AP 00407068 01/22/2020 MITY LITE INC. 7,203.22 0.00 7,203.22 AP 00407069 01/22/2020 MITY LITE INC. 12,192.43 0.00 12,192.43 AP 00407070 01/22/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 497.59 0.00 497.59 AP 00407071 01/22/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 37.70 0.00 37.70 AP 00407072 01/22/2020 NEW COLOR PRINTING 178.87 0.00 178.87 AP 00407073 01/22/2020 NEWCO DISTRIBUTORS INC 1,727.23 0.00 1,727.23 AP 00407074 01/22/2020 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 2,359.73 0.00 2,359.73 AP 00407075 01/22/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 13,575.00 13,575.00 AP 00407076 01/22/2020 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 0.00 107.98 107.98 AP 00407077 01/22/2020 ONWARD ENGINEERING 39,818.13 0.00 39,818.13 AP 00407078 01/22/2020 OPARC 264.00 0.00 264.00 AP 00407079 01/22/2020 OPARC ADC RANCHO 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407080 01/22/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,011.08 898.10 1,909.18 *** AP 00407081 01/22/2020 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS INC 539.52 0.00 539.52 AP 00407082 01/22/2020 PANINI KABOB GRILL 1,634.61 0.00 1,634.61 AP 00407083 01/22/2020 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 593.28 0.00 593.28 AP 00407084 01/22/2020 PFINIX CREATIVE GROUP 9,250.00 0.00 9,250.00 AP 00407085 01/22/2020 POSTAL PERFECT 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00407086 01/22/2020 PRIME GLASS 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00407087 01/22/2020 QUINN COMPANY 43.56 0.00 43.56 AP 00407088 01/22/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 2,631.92 0.00 2,631.92 AP 00407089 01/22/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 11.31 0.00 11.31 AP 00407090 01/22/2020 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00407091 01/22/2020 ROADRUNNER PHARMACY 614.95 0.00 614.95 AP 00407092 01/22/2020 ROTARY CLUB OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 231.25 0.00 231.25 AP 00407093 01/22/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 AP 00407094 01/22/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 0.00 13,272.02 13,272.02 AP 00407095 01/22/2020 SC FUELS 3,597.59 0.00 3,597.59 AP 00407096 01/22/2020 SCHARDIJN, AMY 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00407097 01/22/2020 SIGN SHOP, THE 36.64 0.00 36.64 AP 00407098 01/22/2020 SO CAL SANDBAGS 1,985.29 0.00 1,985.29 AP 00407100 01/22/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 4,262.84 0.00 4,262.84 AP 00407101 01/22/2020 SOLARWINDS INC 3,496.00 0.00 3,496.00 AP 00407102 01/22/2020 SOUTH COAST AQMD 557.42 0.00 557.42 AP 00407107 01/22/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 70,045.33 1,285.59 71,330.92 *** AP 00407108 01/22/2020 STADIUM PLAZA SOUTH OWNERS ASSOCIATION 198.23 0.00 198.23 AP 00407109 01/22/2020 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,149.85 0.00 1,149.85 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 14 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 65 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407110 01/22/2020 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 1,292.74 0.00 1,292.74 AP 00407111 01/22/2020 SUPERION LLC 550.00 0.00 550.00 AP 00407112 01/22/2020 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 300.00 300.00 AP 00407113 01/22/2020 TIREHUB LLC 476.79 0.00 476.79 AP 00407114 01/22/2020 TOT LOT PROS INC 41,600.00 0.00 41,600.00 AP 00407115 01/22/2020 TRINITY EQUIPMENT RENTALS 1,469.72 0.00 1,469.72 AP 00407116 01/22/2020 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 1,519.25 0.00 1,519.25 AP 00407117 01/22/2020 UNITED PACIFIC SERVICES INC 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00407118 01/22/2020 UPS 45.55 0.00 45.55 AP 00407119 01/22/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 102.70 0.00 102.70 AP 00407120 01/22/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 421.11 0.00 421.11 AP 00407121 01/22/2020 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 14,086.82 0.00 14,086.82 AP 00407122 01/22/2020 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER LLC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407123 01/22/2020 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,639.86 0.00 10,639.86 AP 00407124 01/22/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 2,723.28 0.00 2,723.28 AP 00407125 01/22/2020 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 7.49 0.00 7.49 AP 00407126 01/22/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 4,775.74 0.00 4,775.74 AP 00407127 01/22/2020 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF VET MEDICINE 1,105.00 0.00 1,105.00 AP 00407128 01/22/2020 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 731.69 0.00 731.69 AP 00407129 01/22/2020 XIE, LUXI 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00407130 01/22/2020 ZOETIS US LLC 3,242.84 0.00 3,242.84 AP 00407131 01/22/2020 ZOOBEAN INC 3,395.75 0.00 3,395.75 AP 00407132 01/22/2020 ZUNIGA, CRYSTAL 609.68 0.00 609.68 AP 00407133 01/28/2020 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM 0.00 1,666.26 1,666.26 AP 00407134 01/28/2020 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00407135 01/28/2020 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00407136 01/28/2020 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00407137 01/29/2020 6TH & HERMOSA JP/DF LLC 16,160.00 0.00 16,160.00 AP 00407138 01/29/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00407139 01/29/2020 AIR & HOSE SOURCE INC 48.49 0.00 48.49 AP 00407140 01/29/2020 ALCORN, RICHARD 13.00 0.00 13.00 AP 00407141 01/29/2020 ALL WELDING 1,315.00 0.00 1,315.00 AP 00407142 01/29/2020 ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVICES INC 398.00 0.00 398.00 AP 00407143 01/29/2020 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 6,670.80 0.00 6,670.80 AP 00407144 01/29/2020 ARCHITERRA DESIGN GROUP 13,933.75 0.00 13,933.75 AP 00407145 01/29/2020 AROCHO, ALMA 1,369.20 0.00 1,369.20 AP 00407146 01/29/2020 ASSI SECURITY 1,200.00 883.55 2,083.55 *** AP 00407147 01/29/2020 ASUNCION, JHONALEE 15.08 0.00 15.08 AP 00407148 01/29/2020 AUNTIE M CREATIVE CONSULTANTS INC 3,710.94 0.00 3,710.94 AP 00407149 01/29/2020 AUNTIE ROXIE'S LIFE OF THE PARTY 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00407150 01/29/2020 BANK OF AMERICA LSG CAP LSR 162.00 0.00 162.00 AP 00407151 01/29/2020 BAST, KAROLYN 422.40 0.00 422.40 AP 00407152 01/29/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 2,342.32 2,342.32 AP 00407153 01/29/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 28,673.14 0.00 28,673.14 AP 00407154 01/29/2020 BURGESON'S HEATING AND AIR 179.64 0.00 179.64 AP 00407155 01/29/2020 C V W D 113.89 0.00 113.89 AP 00407161 01/29/2020 C V W D 27,694.73 363.06 28,057.79 *** User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 15 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 66 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cu Fire Amount AP 00407162 01/29/2020 C.P. GENERATOR INC. 64.65 0.00 64.65 AP 00407163 01/29/2020 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION 6,144.52 0.00 6,144.52 AP 00407164 01/29/2020 CALIFORNIA SATSANG SOCIETY 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00407165 01/29/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 7.22 0.00 7.22 AP 00407166 01/29/2020 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 64,263.08 0.00 64,263.08 AP 00407167 01/29/2020 CHAMPION AWARDS AND SPECIALTIES 105.60 0.00 105.60 AP 00407168 01/29/2020 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 277.77 0.00 277.77 AP 00407169 01/29/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 4,849.14 120.09 4,969.23 *** AP 00407170 01/29/2020 CIVIC SOLUTIONS INC 6,640.00 0.00 6,640.00 AP 00407171 01/29/2020 CLARK, KAREN 648.00 0.00 648.00 AP 00407172 01/29/2020 CLIMATEC LLC 7,479.00 0.00 7,479.00 AP 00407173 01/29/2020 COAST RECREATION INC 709.65 0.00 709.65 AP 00407174 01/29/2020 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 1,426.84 346.96 1,773.80 *** AP 00407175 01/29/2020 CONVERGEONE INC 16,685.00 0.00 16,685.00 AP 00407176 01/29/2020 D M CONTRACTING INC 68,193.57 0.00 68,193.57 AP 00407177 01/29/2020 DAIMLER TRUST LSR 70.00 0.00 70.00 AP 00407178 01/29/2020 DCS PRINT SHOP LLC 687.98 0.00 687.98 AP 00407179 01/29/2020 DIG SAFE BOARD 342.14 0.00 342.14 AP 00407180 01/29/2020 DOBOS, JAMES L. 36.00 0.00 36.00 AP 00407181 01/29/2020 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 301.20 0.00 301.20 AP 00407182 01/29/2020 DUNN, ANNE MARIE 921.60 0.00 921.60 AP 00407183 01/29/2020 EASTERLING, RAY 278.40 0.00 278.40 AP 00407184 01/29/2020 ECOHERO SHOW LLC, THE 921.46 0.00 921.46 AP 00407185 01/29/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 440.00 0.00 440.00 AP 00407186 01/29/2020 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 104,864.80 0.00 104,864.80 AP 00407187 01/29/2020 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 0.00 380.00 380.00 AP 00407188 01/29/2020 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 204.74 0.00 204.74 AP 00407189 01/29/2020 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 207.28 207.28 AP 00407190 01/29/2020 FERREIRA 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00407191 01/29/2020 FIRST AID 2000 1,757.89 0.00 1,757.89 AP 00407192 01/29/2020 FLAG SYSTEMS INC. 2,700.00 0.00 2,700.00 AP 00407193 01/29/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 10,341.51 0.00 10,341.51 AP 00407195 01/29/2020 FRONTIER COMM 2,104.02 947.14 3,051.16 *** AP 00407196 01/29/2020 FUEL SERV 720.91 190.00 910.91 *** AP 00407197 01/29/2020 GARNER, WILLIAM 140.00 0.00 140.00 AP 00407198 01/29/2020 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,938.00 0.00 1,938.00 AP 00407199 01/29/2020 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 144.00 0.00 144.00 AP 00407200 01/29/2020 GONSALVES AND SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00407201 01/29/2020 GONZALEZ, CATHY 36.00 0.00 36.00 AP 00407202 01/29/2020 GRAINGER 390.49 100.43 490.92 *** AP 00407203 01/29/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 794.65 0.00 794.65 AP 00407204 01/29/2020 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO 159.13 0.00 159.13 AP 00407205 01/29/2020 GREATER TALENT NETWORK LLC 950.43 0.00 950.43 AP 00407206 01/29/2020 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 1,650.00 0.00 1,650.00 AP 00407207 01/29/2020 HAMPTON YOGA 965.40 0.00 965.40 AP 00407208 01/29/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 3,681.00 0.00 3,681.00 AP 00407209 01/29/2020 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC. 19.80 0.00 19.80 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 16 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407210 01/29/2020 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP 231.00 0.00 231.00 AP 00407211 01/29/2020 HI -WAY SAFETY INC 9,872.75 0.00 9,872.75 AP 00407212 01/29/2020 HI -LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 308.30 0.00 308.30 AP 00407213 01/29/2020 HUBBERT, JAMES LIDELL 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00407214 01/29/2020 I A A P CALIFORNIA DIVISION 150.00 0.00 150.00 AP 00407215 01/29/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 1,980.04 0.00 1,980.04 AP 00407216 01/29/2020 INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL COMPOSTING AUTHORITY 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00407217 01/29/2020 INLAND EMPIRE UNITED WAY 0.00 20.00 20.00 AP 00407218 01/29/2020 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 0.00 1,396.00 1,396.00 AP 00407219 01/29/2020 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 531.88 0.00 531.88 AP 00407220 01/29/2020 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 730.15 0.00 730.15 AP 00407221 01/29/2020 INYO NETWORKS 7,015.97 0.00 7,015.97 AP 00407222 01/29/2020 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 1,548.00 0.00 1,548.00 AP 00407223 01/29/2020 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 254,062.39 0.00 254,062.39 AP 00407224 01/29/2020 LAKIN, LYNSEY 18.00 0.00 18.00 AP 00407225 01/29/2020 LAPG 1,772.68 0.00 1,772.68 AP 00407226 01/29/2020 LAUNDRYMATCH LLC 607.25 0.00 607.25 AP 00407227 01/29/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 522.00 0.00 522.00 AP 00407228 01/29/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 18,667.61 0.00 18,667.61 AP 00407229 01/29/2020 MARK CHRISTOPHER INC 277.92 0.00 277.92 AP 00407230 01/29/2020 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 44.00 0.00 44.00 AP 00407231 01/29/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 540.43 0.00 540.43 AP 00407232 01/29/2020 MESKO RESTAURANT GROUP IV INC A CA CORP 1,012.97 0.00 1,012.97 AP 00407233 01/29/2020 MG PETROLEUM INC 489.00 0.00 489.00 AP 00407234 01/29/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 138.01 0.00 138.01 AP 00407235 01/29/2020 MOCK, JASON 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407236 01/29/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW EM PHYS MEDICAL GROUP INC 0.00 315.00 315.00 AP 00407237 01/29/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 30.90 1,365.57 1,396.47 *** AP 00407238 01/29/2020 NBS 21,688.24 0.00 21,688.24 AP 00407239 01/29/2020 NEOPOST-4715 - FIRST DATA REMITCO 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 AP 00407240 01/29/2020 NEXTECH SYSTEMS INC 29,997.60 0.00 29,997.60 AP 00407241 01/29/2020 NICHOLAS E ROSE MEDICAL CONSULTING INC 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00407242 01/29/2020 NIETO, JACOB 87.00 0.00 87.00 AP 00407243 01/29/2020 NV5INC 33,100.64 0.00 33,100.64 AP 00407244 01/29/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 373.00 373.00 AP 00407245 01/29/2020 ONTARIO ELKS LODGE #1419 30.00 0.00 30.00 AP 00407246 01/29/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 463.00 0.00 463.00 AP 00407247 01/29/2020 ORONA, PATRICIA 1,085.00 0.00 1,085.00 AP 00407248 01/29/2020 OTT, LAURA 936.00 0.00 936.00 AP 00407249 01/29/2020 OTT, SHARON 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00407250 01/29/2020 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00407251 01/29/2020 PARTIDA, CARLOS 1.00 0.00 1.00 AP 00407252 01/29/2020 PENDLETON, CARISSA 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00407253 01/29/2020 PFINIX CREATIVE GROUP 9,250.00 0.00 9,250.00 AP 00407254 01/29/2020 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00407255 01/29/2020 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 12,973.14 12,973.14 AP 00407256 01/29/2020 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 1,227.24 0.00 1,227.24 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 17 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 68 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cu Fire Amount AP 00407257 01/29/2020 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING 2,345.75 0.00 2,345.75 AP 00407258 01/29/2020 QUALITY TURF CONSTRUCTION 405.16 0.00 405.16 AP 00407259 01/29/2020 QUINN COMPANY 0.00 1,375.00 1,375.00 AP 00407260 01/29/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 978.40 0.00 978.40 AP 00407261 01/29/2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,333.34 0.00 3,333.34 AP 00407262 01/29/2020 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 315.00 0.00 315.00 AP 00407263 01/29/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 17.59 0.00 17.59 AP 00407264 01/29/2020 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 710.00 0.00 710.00 AP 00407265 01/29/2020 ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 474.00 0.00 474.00 AP 00407266 01/29/2020 RUBENS AUTO COLLISION CENTER 648.29 0.00 648.29 AP 00407267 01/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 0.00 5,763.53 5,763.53 AP 00407268 01/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 70.41 0.00 70.41 AP 00407269 01/29/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY 18,084.96 0.00 18,084.96 AP 00407270 01/29/2020 SBCTOA 0.00 50.00 50.00 AP 00407271 01/29/2020 SBPEA 2,605.74 0.00 2,605.74 AP 00407272 01/29/2020 SC FUELS 24,443.01 0.00 24,443.01 AP 00407273 01/29/2020 SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407274 01/29/2020 SHOETERIA 911.69 0.00 911.69 AP 00407275 01/29/2020 SHRED PROS 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00407276 01/29/2020 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 7,460.90 0.00 7,460.90 AP 00407278 01/29/2020 SOBHIAN, SHAYAN 139.00 0.00 139.00 AP 00407279 01/29/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,720.68 0.00 1,720.68 AP 00407280 01/29/2020 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 4,032.00 0.00 4,032.00 AP 00407281 01/29/2020 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 681.88 681.88 AP 00407282 01/29/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8,845.55 0.00 8,845.55 AP 00407283 01/29/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,387.29 0.00 1,387.29 AP 00407284 01/29/2020 SWEET HONEY IN THE ROCK INC 1,666.00 0.00 1,666.00 AP 00407285 01/29/2020 TECH PRODUCTS INC 3,670.54 0.00 3,670.54 AP 00407286 01/29/2020 TETRA TECH INC 12,864.50 0.00 12,864.50 AP 00407287 01/29/2020 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 110.00 3,367.00 3,477.00 *** AP 00407288 01/29/2020 TIREHUB LLC 710.83 618.64 1,329.47 *** AP 00407289 01/29/2020 TOT LOT PROS INC 163,300.00 0.00 163,300.00 AP 00407290 01/29/2020 TSI INCORPORATED 0.00 751.30 751.30 AP 00407291 01/29/2020 TYUS, IDA 739.80 0.00 739.80 AP 00407292 01/29/2020 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 835.00 0.00 835.00 AP 00407293 01/29/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,124.58 0.00 1,124.58 AP 00407294 01/29/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 22,839.71 0.00 22,839.71 AP 00407295 01/29/2020 ULINE 324.33 0.00 324.33 AP 00407296 01/29/2020 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 138.70 0.00 138.70 AP 00407297 01/29/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 953.64 0.00 953.64 AP 00407298 01/29/2020 UPS 31.00 0.00 31.00 AP 00407299 01/29/2020 URBAN ARENA 72,421.00 0.00 72,421.00 AP 00407300 01/29/2020 US POSTMASTER 11,000.00 0.00 11,000.00 AP 00407301 01/29/2020 UTILITY CRANE & EQUIPMENT INC 2,613.53 0.00 2,613.53 AP 00407302 01/29/2020 VELARDE, FRITZ 37.00 0.00 37.00 AP 00407303 01/29/2020 VERIZON BUSINESS SERVICES 44.57 0.00 44.57 AP 00407304 01/29/2020 VIRGIN PULSE INC 1,096.80 0.00 1,096.80 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 18 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 69 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407305 01/29/2020 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 357.42 0.00 357.42 AP 00407306 01/29/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 3,816.18 0.00 3,816.18 AP 00407307 01/29/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 4,461.09 0.00 4,461.09 AP 00407308 01/29/2020 WEISE, PETER 38.07 0.00 38.07 AP 00407309 01/29/2020 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 171.97 0.00 171.97 AP 00407310 01/29/2020 WEST END YMCA/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,439.96 0.00 9,439.96 AP 00407311 01/29/2020 WEST END YMCA/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10,119.78 0.00 10,119.78 AP 00407312 01/29/2020 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 1,099.86 0.00 1,099.86 AP 00407313 01/29/2020 WYATT GROUP, THE 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00407314 01/29/2020 YANG, FANG 73.67 0.00 73.67 AP 00407315 01/29/2020 YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP INC 0.00 21,648.75 21,648.75 AP 00407316 01/29/2020 ZALEWSKI, JOHN 868.00 0.00 868.00 AP 00407317 01/29/2020 ZEPEDA, TRACY 32.41 0.00 32.41 AP 00407318 02/04/2020 US POSTMASTER 1,510.00 0.00 1,510.00 AP 00407319 02/05/2020 49ER COMMUNICATIONS 0.00 1,301.74 1,301.74 AP 00407320 02/05/2020 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 2,793.47 0.00 2,793.47 AP 00407321 02/05/2020 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 4,088.21 4,088.21 AP 00407322 02/05/2020 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 459.00 0.00 459.00 AP 00407323 02/05/2020 AMUNDSON, STEPHEN ALBERT 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00407324 02/05/2020 AUNTIE M CREATIVE CONSULTANTS INC 377.50 0.00 377.50 AP 00407325 02/05/2020 BAKER & TAYLOR LLC 25.37 0.00 25.37 AP 00407326 02/05/2020 BALDACCI, DENISE 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00407327 02/05/2020 BAUER COMPRESSORS 0.00 3,944.00 3,944.00 AP 00407328 02/05/2020 BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY 11,606.00 0.00 11,606.00 AP 00407329 02/05/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 268.43 268.43 AP 00407330 02/05/2020 BRAVO-VALDEZ, PATRICIA 196.21 0.00 196.21 AP 00407331 02/05/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 19,881.67 0.00 19,881.67 AP 00407332 02/05/2020 BURGESON'S HEATING AND AIR 119.76 0.00 119.76 AP 00407333 02/05/2020 C V W D 133.33 0.00 133.33 AP 00407339 02/05/2020 C V W D 24,000.23 826.29 24,826.52 *** AP 00407340 02/05/2020 C.P. GENERATOR INC. 150.85 0.00 150.85 AP 00407341 02/05/2020 CDW GOVERNMENT INC 1,889.13 5,699.93 7,589.06 *** AP 00407342 02/05/2020 CHAVEZ, JESUS 56.30 0.00 56.30 AP 00407343 02/05/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,268.05 462.62 1,730.67 *** AP 00407344 02/05/2020 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP LLC 270.00 0.00 270.00 AP 00407345 02/05/2020 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 176,393.00 176,393.00 AP 00407346 02/05/2020 COOK, JANA 28.48 0.00 28.48 AP 00407347 02/05/2020 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 144.00 0.00 144.00 AP 00407348 02/05/2020 CROWN POINTE INVESTIGATIONS LLC 0.00 4,225.00 4,225.00 AP 00407349 02/05/2020 CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE 0.00 341.20 341.20 AP 00407350 02/05/2020 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 856.61 1,206.98 2,063.59 *** AP 00407351 02/05/2020 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 8,167.91 0.00 8,167.91 AP 00407352 02/05/2020 DESER, ABIGAIL 1,434.00 0.00 1,434.00 AP 00407353 02/05/2020 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 48.00 0.00 48.00 AP 00407354 02/05/2020 DR HORTON / WESTERN PACIFIC HOUSING INC 14.42 0.00 14.42 AP 00407355 02/05/2020 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 571.08 0.00 571.08 AP 00407356 02/05/2020 ENGLISH, DENISE 250.00 0.00 250.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 19 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 70 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407357 02/05/2020 ERICKSON HALL CONSTRUCTION 0.00 78,491.25 78,491.25 AP 00407358 02/05/2020 EVANS, DESHAWNDA 61.60 0.00 61.60 AP 00407359 02/05/2020 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 1,297.97 0.00 1,297.97 AP 00407360 02/05/2020 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 226.44 226.44 AP 00407361 02/05/2020 FAVELA JR., RICHARD 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00407362 02/05/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 22.90 0.00 22.90 AP 00407363 02/05/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.50 0.00 20.50 AP 00407364 02/05/2020 FIREFIGHTERS' SAFETY CENTER 0.00 3,769.68 3,769.68 AP 00407365 02/05/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 1,358.52 0.00 1,358.52 AP 00407366 02/05/2020 FORTUNE FENCING 1,005.00 0.00 1,005.00 AP 00407367 02/05/2020 FREEWAY TOYOTA OF HANFORD 0.00 59,999.86 59,999.86 AP 00407368 02/05/2020 FRONTIER COMM 1,154.92 390.96 1,545.88 *** AP 00407369 02/05/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,389.36 0.00 3,389.36 AP 00407370 02/05/2020 GALE, BRIAN 868.00 0.00 868.00 AP 00407371 02/05/2020 GLADWELL GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407372 02/05/2020 G & M BUSINESS INTERIORS 387.67 0.00 387.67 AP 00407373 02/05/2020 GOULD, NANCY 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00407374 02/05/2020 GRAINGER 1,065.57 286.40 1,351.97 *** AP 00407375 02/05/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,504.46 0.00 1,504.46 AP 00407376 02/05/2020 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO 39.78 0.00 39.78 AP 00407377 02/05/2020 GRIFFIN, ALESSANDRA 124.50 0.00 124.50 AP 00407378 02/05/2020 GUARDIAN ROOFS & ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC 459.81 0.00 459.81 AP 00407379 02/05/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 2,028.00 0.00 2,028.00 AP 00407380 02/05/2020 HARRY AND DAVID LLC 148.01 0.00 148.01 AP 00407381 02/05/2020 HEPNER, MIREYA 287.31 0.00 287.31 AP 00407382 02/05/2020 HO, HOWARD 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00407383 02/05/2020 HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA LLC 16.11 0.00 16.11 AP 00407384 02/05/2020 HOYT LUMBER CO., SM 0.00 12.20 12.20 AP 00407385 02/05/2020 HUDSON AUDIO WORKS 1,490.00 0.00 1,490.00 AP 00407386 02/05/2020 HULL, DEBORAH 23,712.00 0.00 23,712.00 AP 00407387 02/05/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 226.56 0.00 226.56 AP 00407388 02/05/2020 INDEPENDENT ROOFING CONSULTANTS 4,500.00 0.00 4,500.00 AP 00407389 02/05/2020 INLAND EMPIRE REGIONAL COMPOSTING AUTHORITY 225.00 0.00 225.00 AP 00407390 02/05/2020 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 284.25 0.00 284.25 AP 00407391 02/05/2020 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 536.75 0.00 536.75 AP 00407392 02/05/2020 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 7,701.95 2,208.45 9,910.40 *** AP 00407393 02/05/2020 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,010.34 0.00 1,010.34 AP 00407394 02/05/2020 ITERIS INC 19,802.98 0.00 19,802.98 AP 00407395 02/05/2020 JACOBS, JONATHON 3,900.00 0.00 3,900.00 AP 00407396 02/05/2020 JENSEN, KEVIN 35.61 0.00 35.61 AP 00407397 02/05/2020 JL GROUP LLC 11,769.23 0.00 11,769.23 AP 00407398 02/05/2020 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 1,296.00 0.00 1,296.00 AP 00407399 02/05/2020 KB HOME 6,127.00 0.00 6,127.00 AP 00407400 02/05/2020 KEITH, JORRY 270.00 0.00 270.00 AP 00407401 02/05/2020 KOONTZ, PHIL 1,634.61 0.00 1,634.61 AP 00407402 02/05/2020 LANDVOGT, JUSTIN 0.00 697.93 697.93 AP 00407403 02/05/2020 LAURIE, GIANFRANCO 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 20 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 71 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407404 02/05/2020 LEACH, GEORGE W 4.02 0.00 4.02 AP 00407405 02/05/2020 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00407406 02/05/2020 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES 80.00 0.00 80.00 AP 00407407 02/05/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 0.00 13,442.95 13,442.95 AP 00407408 02/05/2020 LIFE ASSIST INC 12,157.59 0.00 12,157.59 AP 00407409 02/05/2020 LIMA, JENNA 112.00 0.00 112.00 AP 00407410 02/05/2020 LIN R ROGERS ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS INC 236.48 0.00 236.48 AP 00407411 02/05/2020 LINNELL, SHERRY 868.00 0.00 868.00 AP 00407412 02/05/2020 LITTLE BEAR PRODUCTIONS 7,085.00 0.00 7,085.00 AP 00407413 02/05/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00407414 02/05/2020 LVD EMPIRE LAKES LLC 52,104.00 0.00 52,104.00 AP 00407415 02/05/2020 MAIN STREET SIGNS 937.10 0.00 937.10 AP 00407416 02/05/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 87,747.91 0.00 87,747.91 AP 00407417 02/05/2020 MAZOR, MARYA 1,133.00 0.00 1,133.00 AP 00407418 02/05/2020 MCI 33.50 0.00 33.50 AP 00407419 02/05/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 49.46 0.00 49.46 AP 00407420 02/05/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 83.55 0.00 83.55 AP 00407421 02/05/2020 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 252.00 0.00 252.00 AP 00407422 02/05/2020 MMASC 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00407423 02/05/2020 MORENO VALLEY, CITY OF 120.00 0.00 120.00 AP 00407424 02/05/2020 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC 89.58 0.00 89.58 AP 00407425 02/05/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 170.95 0.00 170.95 AP 00407426 02/05/2020 MUSIC STAR 374.40 0.00 374.40 AP 00407427 02/05/2020 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY 187.54 0.00 187.54 AP 00407428 02/05/2020 NAM, YEE EUN 1,334.00 0.00 1,334.00 AP 00407429 02/05/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 110.76 826.50 937.26 *** AP 00407430 02/05/2020 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP. 674.57 0.00 674.57 AP 00407431 02/05/2020 NV5INC 30,561.52 0.00 30,561.52 AP 00407432 02/05/2020 O S T S INC 1,770.00 0.00 1,770.00 AP 00407433 02/05/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 0.00 171.00 171.00 AP 00407434 02/05/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 982.48 234.41 1,216.89 *** AP 00407435 02/05/2020 PACIFIC WESTERN BANK 8,079.69 18,852.61 26,932.30 *** AP 00407436 02/05/2020 PATTON SALES CORP 144.04 0.00 144.04 AP 00407437 02/05/2020 PEP BOYS 10.76 0.00 10.76 AP 00407438 02/05/2020 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 0.00 5,085.42 5,085.42 AP 00407439 02/05/2020 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 544.44 0.00 544.44 AP 00407440 02/05/2020 PUBLIC GROUP OF CA LLC, THE 3,433.97 0.00 3,433.97 AP 00407441 02/05/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 463.54 0.00 463.54 AP 00407442 02/05/2020 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 153,514.10 358,199.55 511,713.65 *** AP 00407443 02/05/2020 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 722.41 0.00 722.41 AP 00407444 02/05/2020 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTOR 0.00 984.86 984.86 AP 00407445 02/05/2020 REHABWEST INC 1,018.40 0.00 1,018.40 AP 00407446 02/05/2020 REYES COCA-COLA BOTTLING LLC 812.89 0.00 812.89 AP 00407447 02/05/2020 ROMO PLANNING GROUP INC 3,880.00 0.00 3,880.00 AP 00407448 02/05/2020 ROTO ROOTER SERVICES COMPANY 3,250.00 0.00 3,250.00 AP 00407449 02/05/2020 SAN BERNARDINO CTY AUDITOR CONTROLLER 104.00 0.00 104.00 AP 00407450 02/05/2020 SCMAF INLAND VALLEYS 310.00 0.00 310.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 21 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 72 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00407451 02/05/2020 SDC LEAGUE HEALTH FUND 850.00 0.00 850.00 AP 00407452 02/05/2020 SDC LEAGUE PENSION FUND 306.00 0.00 306.00 AP 00407453 02/05/2020 SERPAS BUILDING & REMODELING INC 344.79 0.00 344.79 AP 00407454 02/05/2020 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO, THE 218.27 0.00 218.27 AP 00407455 02/05/2020 SHRED PROS 68.00 113.00 181.00 *** AP 00407458 02/05/2020 SOCAL PPE 0.00 2,128.50 2,128.50 AP 00407459 02/05/2020 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 4,355.00 0.00 4,355.00 AP 00407468 02/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 18,123.69 2,325.70 20,449.39 *** AP 00407469 02/05/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 36.22 0.00 36.22 AP 00407470 02/05/2020 STATEWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY & SIGNS INC 1,065.53 0.00 1,065.53 AP 00407471 02/05/2020 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 943.51 0.00 943.51 AP 00407472 02/05/2020 STOR'EM SELF STORAGE 575.00 0.00 575.00 AP 00407473 02/05/2020 SWEET DOUGH CAFE 294.00 0.00 294.00 AP 00407474 02/05/2020 THOMPSON BUILDING MATERIALS 2,307.76 0.00 2,307.76 AP 00407475 02/05/2020 TIREHUB LLC 2,395.00 0.00 2,395.00 AP 00407476 02/05/2020 TORO TOWING 750.00 0.00 750.00 AP 00407477 02/05/2020 TOT LOT PROS INC 120,300.00 0.00 120,300.00 AP 00407478 02/05/2020 TRIMARK PACIFIC 5,220.00 0.00 5,220.00 AP 00407479 02/05/2020 TRIMARK PACIFIC RANCHO CUCAMONGA LLC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00407480 02/05/2020 TRINITY EQUIPMENT RENTALS 685.54 0.00 685.54 AP 00407481 02/05/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,134.23 0.00 1,134.23 AP 00407482 02/05/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 15,990.42 0.00 15,990.42 AP 00407483 02/05/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00407484 02/05/2020 UNITED WAY 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00407485 02/05/2020 UPLAND AUTO TRIM 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00407486 02/05/2020 UPS 31.00 0.00 31.00 AP 00407487 02/05/2020 UTILITY CRANE & EQUIPMENT INC 1,147.48 0.00 1,147.48 AP 00407488 02/05/2020 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 42.99 42.99 AP 00407489 02/05/2020 VAN DAELE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 26,237.64 0.00 26,237.64 AP 00407490 02/05/2020 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00407491 02/05/2020 VELARDE, HOPE 15.99 0.00 15.99 AP 00407492 02/05/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,015.35 5,015.35 AP 00407493 02/05/2020 VIVINT SOLAR DEVELOPER LLC 333.46 0.00 333.46 AP 00407494 02/05/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,351.56 33.17 1,384.73 *** AP 00407495 02/05/2020 WORLD ELITE GYMNASTICS 262.50 0.00 262.50 AP 00407496 02/05/2020 WYSOCKI, ASHLEY 109.72 0.00 109.72 Total City: $6,473,800.02 Total Fire: $1,227,227.79 Grand Total: Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 22 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:11:25 Page 73 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 12/2 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 5,721.75 5,721.75 12/2 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 911.24 - 911.24 12/2 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 3,677.35 3,677.35 12/3 Bank Fee 69.35 69.35 12/3 U.S. BANK - Purchasing Card Payment 29,492.41 16,471.71 45,964.12 12/3 U.S. BANK - Corporate Card Payment 59,473.88 24,578.14 84,052.02 12/3 U.S. BANK - Costco Card Payment 733.37 492.05 1,225.42 12/3 Workers Comp- City Account Transfer 1,725.66 - 1,725.66 12/3 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 24.00 24.00 12/4 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,062.50 - 2,062.50 12/4 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 866.50 - 866.50 12/4 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 492.09 492.09 12/5 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments - 5,304.86 5,304.86 12/5 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 4,969.05 - 4,969.05 12/5 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 7,177.13 7,177.13 12/6 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 57,740.05 - 57,740.05 12/6 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 119,900.53 - 119,900.53 12/6 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 1,082.72 1,082.72 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 2,920.59 2,920.59 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,952.92 3,952.92 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,507.48 4,507.48 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 9,292.50 9,292.50 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 12,026.23 12,026.23 12/9 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit - 113,100.72 113,100.72 12/9 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 226.57 - 226.57 12/9 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 317.42 317.42 12/10 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 73,171.76 - 73,171.76 12/10 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 804.90 - 804.90 12/10 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 151.34 151.34 12/11 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 4,049.10 - 4,049.10 12/11 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 16,272.15 16,272.15 12/12 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 110.19 - 110.19 12/12 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 175.08 175.08 12/13 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 3,026.00 - 3,026.00 12/13 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 1,748.54 1,748.54 12/16 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 4,948.08 - 4,948.08 12/16 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 296.42 - 296.42 12/16 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 318.78 318.78 12/17 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,062.50 - 2,062.50 12/17 Workers Comp- City Account Transfer 1,559.58 - 1,559.58 12/18 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 163,008.64 163,008.64 12/19 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments - 4,863.69 4,863.69 12/19 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 172.83 - 172.83 12/19 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 431.44 431.44 12/20 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 595.19 - 595.19 12/23 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 6,419.10 6,419.10 12/23 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 488.16 - 488.16 12/23 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 1,444.28 1,444.28 12/24 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 54,780.00 - 54,780.00 12/24 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 114,080.00 - 114,080.00 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit - 2,604.77 2,604.77 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,563.92 3,563.92 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,760.18 4,760.18 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 9,292.50 9,292.50 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 12,271.68 12,271.68 12/24 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 113,362.05 113,362.05 1 Page 74 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register December 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 12/24 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 2,062.50 2,062.50 12/26 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,942.81 - 1,942.81 12/26 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 7,173.60 7,173.60 12/27 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 6,937.50 - 6,937.50 12/27 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 2,999.95 - 2,999.95 12/27 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 2,408.45 2,408.45 12/30 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,599.58 - 1,599.58 12/30 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer - 90.99 90.99 12/31 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 2,931.17 - 2,931.17 12/31 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 6,014.48 - 6,014.48 12/31 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments - 5,044.89 5,044.89 TOTAL CITY 574,944.66 TOTAL FIRE 554,404.88 G RAND TOTAL 1,129, 349.54 2 Page 75 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS FOR CHECKS ISSUED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,708.08 DATED JANUARY 07, 2020 THROUGH FEBRUARY 10, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 So Ca Gas - Check Register Page 76 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. Agenda Check Register 1/7/2020 through 2/10/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00406716 01/08/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 19,063.00 2,564.81 21,627.81 *** AP 00406900 01/15/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 794.19 0.00 794.19 AP 00407099 01/22/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 20.43 1,458.81 1,479.24 *** AP 00407277 01/29/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 18,073.34 1,845.32 19,918.66 *** AP 00407456 02/05/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 5,889.17 364.87 6,254.04 *** AP 00407457 02/05/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 867.95 0.00 867.95 Total City: $44,708.08 Total Fire: $6,233.81 Grand Total: S50,94T.Wq Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 02/11/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:16:54 Page 77 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James C. Frost, City Treasurer INITIATED BY: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Department Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE CURRENT INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2019. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the attached current investment schedule for the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of December 31, 2019. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedule as of December 31, 2019 reflects cash and investments managed by the Finance/Treasury Management Division and is in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's adopted Investment Policy as approved by the City Council on February 20, 2019. ANALYSIS: The City Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City Treasurer has elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Portfolio Management - Portfolio Summary December 31, 2019 Page 78 cc O C v d Eo Co N ci C = M v O 0 v 0 0 CL . a W W P O M M M M O m N M I� a N N� N m m Of n M P O N N o � 9! N N OI N N N O r N N I m.- co O N I O) O "' - C4r O m 00 N — 9 "t 9 N N T m O � N C O O O N LO ui 6 : cd 0 G O O 131 m O r N N W to O� c0 O m I- OM1 Gmi O O M O Off r m O N r O m O O N O ddff O V 0 n m o o coo 0 o o o o o 0 0 0 c C C 0- 0 ori M o 0 o 00 0 0 I� O O O o w C Lq 0 N aD N a0 a N b r o N tip r N n O r M M tNO� co 00 N 10 N r O N r t0 n � r � co M n M M cm IN D c +� ?A C m c U o 0 c c U � H a Q c c a « o y 2 Q d�o� a.. U c �y S 12 VO J J U L F I U f% C U Q to H D d w c� a� m C � •� C N T C U o and c H d N C � pO N U ' ¢H O) N N r- 60 O O NE NN N c LL 0) 2 - OL OE O O O o" Q �y of o d . Q v �0) N 3 i O �L U) cm N t N M � � LL H 82 0 CL .y F O N N C o 0 C O C 0) y 'C C C N N E W ��°C o M ED °c� m o N U n j5 « � U>0 �5 C C T N — «EU E cc C a'� Q' c y� w 0 O LD UlrQm� > N �m E H U Q WQ �> O F- 11� 0-a— < M m U r- Cl) o n m I r O a a a 's o Page 79 r O O O v n CV mI N N N N O O O v n UUi N N N O O O O O O O O O Lo Lo Ld N N N pO O U! A E12 d M I o i o CV r tmOp C{U) m r Of Ol l7 co W W U) U) O W O 0 O O O ppO O (mOp O I O O OO O In to N N N OM7 OR O 3E��Ci O O O o 0 oO pp g O O O O O W O 8O N N N A co O W O O 91 31 101 M m m m I Oo O O N N C8, ar O � N E r IM N N � r V C M > W m ? O E 0 v O pO t O d r r N 0 0 0 IL 1E ro (� d a' O O O v n CV mI N N N N O O O v n UUi N N N O O O O O O O O O Lo Lo Ld N N N pO O U! A E12 d M I o i o CV r tmOp C{U) m r Of Ol l7 co W W U) U) O W O 0 O O O ppO O (mOp O I O O OO O In to N N N OM7 OR O 3E��Ci O O O o 0 oO pp g O O O O O W O 8O N N N A co O W O O 91 31 101 M m m m I Oo O O N N C8, ar O � N ooa N Lo co m ? � O I O pO I r r N O O O v n CV mI N N N N O O O v n UUi N N N O O O O O O O O O Lo Lo Ld N N N pO O U! A E12 d M I o i o CV r tmOp C{U) m r Of Ol l7 co W W U) U) O W O 0 O O O ppO O (mOp O I O O OO O In to N N N OM7 OR O 3E��Ci O O O o 0 oO pp g O O O O O W O 8O N N N A co O W O O 91 31 101 M m m m n ar N N N N � N N aoo ? O O pO Z r r N Y O O o m N C an M N n 9 y M W N U M W z n ar N J ? O Z Y o m U. C o U z ca C �+ i- O O =ai z U 0 Z QU w VS W sm W WV a � 0 LL m Q d m d F❑❑ Q J Q Z Q to J 10 U O e l e LL O F _W o m m Lo Y O O N N M N O NVM V N 0 0 NO O N N N r O O O O O O OO O OMN d O O O O O O O O O O N N MNM MNM MN1 mNN NCNOND M_C0M W0cNNO C0MN0D OWM Nn P �N N;C34 mN O— Nn NmN MO ON NmCC gmN N 'U2N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -o o — o 0 o n N O N O m 0 N O m W nN mm M 77 M O W O N 0 O D n n N M m M mmm N dO` Q dri a O O O O N M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M OR m m Oi O m M M m N OR NU� m O � .2 a � a a � a � � a � a -� .2 � a 4 Oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W n M N N n m N N O M N O N N O O M M n OD to M 0 CA OD CO m m m W O Co M M M N m N M m 01 O O M O N N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n O O m O N V' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V• 0 0 0 0 N m fz C C C C O C C C C C O 0 C C m O O 01 O m f� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O V• O N CD Cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O 00 O CO CA N O O O O O O O OO O O O O O M O O W O Of CA O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q CD M O O Cn O O m O 0 CL 0 0 0 0 0 V' M •f M — V• N N M M V f0 V• V• M V M V V co M O W O m N CW m m 0 m m N M O O m O n .- m m N O N m M O W N CA N V' O CA m m 3 t0 m OD A w j N w N m m C N CA Oi M n O M M n '- N M m 0 Ch V' O O to N N O m s Os�� N Ol t� N n n m N�{{ n finV•• N O O O M N O N O O O O OOD O W Om0 N O N O 0 o CD O In O O m O O m O at In CD O O V' O O O O tp N V• V— IT —— V' N N M N V• m M Cl) M V Co V• '•t M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o Ct 0 Ct Ct 0 0 0 0 0 Ct 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O h O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 o w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Lf O O LR O O m o o m O o 0 m O O o 0 m M y V• � V' � - V• N N eM M V• m V V• C+i V• M V• V• M m m m n n n m a rn m rn w m m m m m n m m w w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N o 0 0 m CL) C N M M .n m w a a m rn n rn0 0 m m 0 0 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y z z z z z z Q z z z z z Q z z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y x Y 9 9 m m 9 m 9 m m 9 m 9 m Z Z Z z Z z z z Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ z z z z z z z z z W W W W w W W W W W W W W 0 Q 0Q Q Q Q¢ Q Q Q x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U J J J J J J J J J ¢¢ Q Q Q Q¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q O 0 0 0 00000 lL lL LL LL LL lL lL LL LL LL LL LL LL x x S x S x x x S qJ J qJ JJ QJ 4J qJ qJ qJ QJ QJ J J JJ QJ QJ J QJ QJ qJ QJ QJ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL c a 7 VO O O M O O O m N Cn m N m m n N m M m n m CD N N N uD m CO n N N c c Q� J❑ x] d W v v LL D d z❑ M m F N x N¢ ¢ Z 0 x m w>} N CJ } U x N U. LL 0 0 2 2 -� Y Y Y Y Y J m rn rn rn QQ W C7 a S W W W W W W W W W W W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M LL, M M f`7 lr7 C7 M M M C7 C7 M M M C7 Ih M M C7 C�7 M C7 M Page 80 U. 7 o m C o U 0)7 C �+ O O CD O O 0 a c c o m M Lo Y Q o m m d m y Q O E n UUCl) N Cl) co U m O O N N M N O NVM V N 0 0 NO O N N N r O O O O O O OO O OMN d O O O O O O O O O O N N MNM MNM MN1 mNN NCNOND M_C0M W0cNNO C0MN0D OWM Nn P �N N;C34 mN O— Nn NmN MO ON NmCC gmN N 'U2N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -o o — o 0 o n N O N O m 0 N O m W nN mm M 77 M O W O N 0 O D n n N M m M mmm N dO` Q dri a O O O O N M M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M OR m m Oi O m M M m N OR NU� m O � .2 a � a a � a � � a � a -� .2 � a 4 Oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W n M N N n m N N O M N O N N O O M M n OD to M 0 CA OD CO m m m W O Co M M M N m N M m 01 O O M O N N M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n O O m O N V' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O V• 0 0 0 0 N m fz C C C C O C C C C C O 0 C C m O O 01 O m f� O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m O O V• O N CD Cn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O 00 O CO CA N O O O O O O O OO O O O O O M O O W O Of CA O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q CD M O O Cn O O m O 0 CL 0 0 0 0 0 V' M •f M — V• N N M M V f0 V• V• M V M V V co M O W O m N CW m m 0 m m N M O O m O n .- m m N O N m M O W N CA N V' O CA m m 3 t0 m OD A w j N w N m m C N CA Oi M n O M M n '- N M m 0 Ch V' O O to N N O m s Os�� N Ol t� N n n m N�{{ n finV•• N O O O M N O N O O O O OOD O W Om0 N O N O 0 o CD O In O O m O O m O at In CD O O V' O O O O tp N V• V— IT —— V' N N M N V• m M Cl) M V Co V• '•t M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 0 0 o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o Ct 0 Ct Ct 0 0 0 0 0 Ct 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O h O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 o w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W Lf O O LR O O m o o m O o 0 m O O o 0 m M y V• � V' � - V• N N eM M V• m V V• C+i V• M V• V• M m m m n n n m a rn m rn w m m m m m n m m w w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N o 0 0 m CL) C N M M .n m w a a m rn n rn0 0 m m 0 0 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y z z z z z z Q z z z z z Q z z Y Y Y Y Y Y Y x Y 9 9 m m 9 m 9 m m 9 m 9 m Z Z Z z Z z z z Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑ z z z z z z z z z W W W W w W W W W W W W W 0 Q 0Q Q Q Q¢ Q Q Q x x x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U U J J J J J J J J J ¢¢ Q Q Q Q¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q O 0 0 0 00000 lL lL LL LL LL lL lL LL LL LL LL LL LL x x S x S x x x S qJ J qJ JJ QJ 4J qJ qJ qJ QJ QJ J J JJ QJ QJ J QJ QJ qJ QJ QJ w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL c a 7 VO O O M O O O m N Cn m N m m n N m M m n m CD N N N uD m CO n N N c c Q� J❑ x] d W v v LL D d z❑ M m F N x N¢ ¢ Z 0 x m w>} N CJ } U x N U. LL 0 0 2 2 -� Y Y Y Y Y J m rn rn rn QQ W C7 a S W W W W W W W W W W W W W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q M M M M M M M M M M M M M O O O O O O O O O M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M LL, M M f`7 lr7 C7 M M M C7 C7 M M M C7 Ih M M C7 C�7 M C7 M Page 80 N w O o 0 0 0 70 70 O O O O O O O O o 0 n w 0 70 M O N N w w O M 0 0 0 0 N 0 c0 CD 7n 70 N m W m n n 0 0 0 0 n 70 N� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7n O O O O O O O OO m m m m w v M y M y M M v w v v v v m W M m O O n m m m w m NN m m N W n m O O m M 7n N O M W 'at n W m .Wp N C0D CMD O M n O 007 M I CR t� comW On7 W co N N N O O O O O W 007 W W W a W W O O W 7n 0 0 0 0 7n O W W W N N M N IT M M M v M M V 7n V M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7n 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 C 0 0 t0 O O O O M M M Mu� v M v M v M M v u) v v v v N N N N O O o 0 N N N N M M M r r O r O ArzA;;IQ M en M 70 mN M !O I N r N CN C4 C aa�a� Ex O CR R n O Ln Q O tOD W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O Z Z Z Z N n 7n rn W W a mo m m a S5 7n co aD co n LO N�_ N N N N N N N O .- z M N N N LO mN_�p .N_.pp �_�pp mMm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ? 0 0 V Oct N m 0 ;: (A O N m N O O M co N N N m r h W w C h .- i0 7n W .- M CD 1h h n CC M M r w O 021 I O S 0 0 0 0 m 70 M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70m 0 n 7n 0 M 7A O N N M �g M O M O O O O N OI N O m 7n N m W m n n O O O n O N V P 00 b fV N .11�- �ffQ- •��qq- �QQ fffVQQ � 7n M IV M {meqq (�QQ f�QQ l�QQ f�QQ (�� fNQ 1NQQ f�QQ l�QQ ll�� Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q w N w O o 0 0 0 70 70 O O O O O O O O o 0 n w 0 70 M O N N w w O M 0 0 0 0 N 0 c0 CD 7n 70 N m W m n n 0 0 0 0 n 70 N� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7n O O O O O O O OO m m m m w v M y M y M M v w v v v v m W M m O O n m m m w m NN m m N W n m O O m M 7n N O M W 'at n W m .Wp N C0D CMD O M n O 007 M I CR t� comW On7 W co N N N O O O O O W 007 W W W a W W O O W 7n 0 0 0 0 7n O W W W N N M N IT M M M v M M V 7n V M M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7n 0 0 0 0 0 70 0 C 0 0 t0 O O O O M M M Mu� v M v M v M M v u) v v v v N N N N O O o 0 N N N N M M M r r O r O ArzA;;IQ M en M 70 mN M !O I N r N CN C4 C aa�a� Ex O CR R n O Ln Q 0 0 0 700 tOD r r O Z Z Z Z O co n LO N�_ rl:� LO pS Y� V Oct N m O� ;: ;:0 M M M r m 7n N a NLc O Iq h O m Iq CD' H O S V r d' M -V M �g aD OD b N g W W m m m n n n n W W W W W u7 m m m � O Z Z Z Z g O o 0 0 0 rl:� 0 0 O 0 0 0 C 0 ;: ;:0 O7o 0 7a 0 00 0 o m m o 0 O 0 700 0 7p O 7n N O O NV 7n M IV M 0 w CO in N r a- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 g W W m m m n n n n W W W W W u7 m m m � O Z Z Z Z N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N0 N Nm N � W W a W co ao a t7n m aQi a CD L° QNQ Qy Qi 111 W W ll� as o:aaaaaaaaa O7o y� w W 00 00 00 00 00 O O Qm 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 7 000000000000 N G Y Y w Z Z � � R � S d' 2 w d' Ir 0.' LL' S zz Z a1 O. QOOOOOOOOOOOOz of Vm W O O m m n Cl) N N CO Z Z z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z z Z Z Q Q Q Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J y N CID w w w W w w w w w w W w w w J J J J F H F H m m m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q Q I¢ 0 coNW ONO CNND N N N 2 S 2 x S S x S S S x x 2 S z Z z 9999999999999999999Q w w w w W w w w w w w w w w w w w w 9 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL c LL LL LL LL w U. LL LL LL LL O c 7 m n n W n m W n M m m m W O M M M 7nm n m m m N N M Cl) M N Lf) m c n n m m m m m m m n n n n n m m m cc G c N 2 - 9 xM H N n m W i N- QSO) v m `�c7x�c01�_ [qL S S 01 07 m m m �— D:D 7 N M M M Q Q is c� c� c� c� i���{ c� c� i� iaa� c� 0 a 0 0 0 0 !L CO M Cl) Cl) M M M (h M M M M M fh M M M f7 W W W w O O O O Z Z Z Z aQi a CD L° QNQ Qy Qi 111 W W ll� F H a 0 Cl) (n c W 7 N G O O. 0 7n n 7nm Vm W O O m m n C 7 y N CID m m m Ol coNW ONO CNND N N N F- m W W a) �Oq g Z cm O LL U LL O Y m Z ED m m Z Q 0 z c ❑ w C O O V m v Q o 07 G Y t O � O N IL u}i R, N N a Page 81 M IL P O z M U U Q mm G d 0 0 Cl)0 m coN EL a coD .0 V V o 0 0 rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0o O O O O o O 0 0 0 0 O O O o N Lq N O i v R v v n m W m O O O O N NCli .- 0 0 0 C co r a ca ca -a I Z Z Z Z to - L:) 9 9 L:) 0000 a! F F- 1- H U U U U > M 0: of w F F F F to (n N lA z z z z 0000 w w w w m I= Ix w w Y Y Y Y m m m Z m zzzz _� 0 N W co M M y A C O 1 3! CLL 0 =_ OD m m m m m m m LO &0 8 U) N1 vvva N M m J �l Cl) m N Qm C W CL O Q O Page 82 7 O f7 N O N N N N N N N p O O N O O O O O O N N N A SCIS 7CmN�p _N 0 0 a N 'G � 0� �a�aaa a a 0 0 0 0 0 OOD f/1 g O m M N fn0 V 5 N n O IN+f 1. 02 m rn Z Z 2 0 0 O C w tp N O O M OI Ip (A T www00 m N O m ao m n v, E V m>N 0 fIlVQQ CO N cc lN�� lNQQ -Z IT Q Q Q Q Q V C M w o o O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 S OM a O O O O O O g w m OO O O O O N m O It m M O Q m r M fV fV r N H Lo 8 O 7 8 8 M M . O �N�pp O dap Y p m n n OD N 0 O/ N Oi O m Of W O 1� tp ma 111yyyppp Oa O � O (h M N C9 N in N P O z M U U Q mm G d 0 0 Cl)0 m coN EL a coD .0 V V o 0 0 rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0o O O O O o O 0 0 0 0 O O O o N Lq N O i v R v v n m W m O O O O N NCli .- 0 0 0 C co r a ca ca -a I Z Z Z Z to - L:) 9 9 L:) 0000 a! F F- 1- H U U U U > M 0: of w F F F F to (n N lA z z z z 0000 w w w w m I= Ix w w Y Y Y Y m m m Z m zzzz _� 0 N W co M M y A C O 1 3! CLL 0 =_ OD m m m m m m m LO &0 8 U) N1 vvva N M m J �l Cl) m N Qm C W CL O Q O Page 82 7 m tn0 8 8 O r p O O N N cogym�{{ O A O m N m OD tq N a N 'G In aD O CD OV a a W O O O OOD f/1 g v M v ui Co M N U U U y �+ m m rn Z Z 2 0 0 O C w (A T www00 Q' E V m>N 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a a 3 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 V C M w o o O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 S OM a e e e o .0Ct g w m Lo f7 < O co- co N O Q m `Oo m n w rn n m m osssss a 111yyyppp N N N N � mN v m _ V d a 0 0 0 0 0 0 so 01 _ P. N Q m Iq P O z M U U Q mm G d 0 0 Cl)0 m coN EL a coD .0 V V o 0 0 rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0o O O O O o O 0 0 0 0 O O O o N Lq N O i v R v v n m W m O O O O N NCli .- 0 0 0 C co r a ca ca -a I Z Z Z Z to - L:) 9 9 L:) 0000 a! F F- 1- H U U U U > M 0: of w F F F F to (n N lA z z z z 0000 w w w w m I= Ix w w Y Y Y Y m m m Z m zzzz _� 0 N W co M M y A C O 1 3! CLL 0 =_ OD m m m m m m m LO &0 8 U) N1 vvva N M m J �l Cl) m N Qm C W CL O Q O Page 82 z z v O O N 00 a a 00 U U U y ? m rn Z Z 2 0 0 m www00 Q' JJ —1 a: J as as as v v a 0 a a a 3 w _ a � � w m P O z M U U Q mm G d 0 0 Cl)0 m coN EL a coD .0 V V o 0 0 rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0o O O O O o O 0 0 0 0 O O O o N Lq N O i v R v v n m W m O O O O N NCli .- 0 0 0 C co r a ca ca -a I Z Z Z Z to - L:) 9 9 L:) 0000 a! F F- 1- H U U U U > M 0: of w F F F F to (n N lA z z z z 0000 w w w w m I= Ix w w Y Y Y Y m m m Z m zzzz _� 0 N W co M M y A C O 1 3! CLL 0 =_ OD m m m m m m m LO &0 8 U) N1 vvva N M m J �l Cl) m N Qm C W CL O Q O Page 82 It ® & ) IL f 0LL ( a �■ CL § k � ■ ¥ co > # 2 0) k § - ¥ § r K � ® ■ § k U @ C4 SO Co ■ CL 0 ccb.k � � J c O 0 E � � ® k � D ; CL IL a /) U wecs 4 � ° � § e � � > \ @ & � § � Page 83 3 O O r O O C O 0 0 O i V�, M 0 co CO W v I O C E9 CO O O O O O O 0 O T 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O O o CM of o 0 0 T M � p n ca J2 O E O O mCL m Ri CM >% O O O O cc3 v 0 0 00 C 00 0 C (a m o O t Q0 00 o n � � Q N co n Ii pt V co � m v m 0 O O r O O C O 0 0 O i V�, M 0 co CO W v I O co O O O O O CO O O O O O O 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 0 n O O o M of o 0 0 o V N O O Lo M m LLI > O O 0a. O O O O 0 0 00 C 00 0 cq o O 00 o n If co n o 1 CL O 7 i _¢""° a� U M o 2 m O LLI > 0a. a n f a cck oil N Ii pt rlt COO � 0 0O W N O d NQ O O r N I v O O n b I CD �II CIt Ci ao so eo N aW aNaNNN O O O O aaaa I o o O o O O o O n 110 CO COD. W 0 N O N N r — N '- — N — O N a. d U Ix w � > 00 N Z Y Y Fes- F 5 z~ gZZoo z z LL w t m m R 0 h O �- o z z z z a LL Z > V O O J U E ¢I mI Q� x x x xE M I N Z y ¢ Z J fA H Z W W W W W W M fA O • c O W W W W W W g c Y c c �3 c 11mgq a 0c a C o y r°fi V O 0 0 0 0 O 0 m `r° `r° U Q 0 m C Y a c> > c 0C. m N moo 0 Ct o m M o o 0 0 m ' O co u}i V m ci �:, a, cn �:, �, H a y O V H 'C 7 N V d (0 N 0 O L m CL o y Page 94 CL O 7 _¢""° a� U M o 2 m O LLI > 0a. a f a 0 N at at A r H 'C 7 N V d (0 N 0 O L m CL o y Page 94 N m IL IL 07 T N O E'o if 0 m w 0 G ao N f0 C9 C4 N a tN0 C, N Pages c N E O O CD E • v N r N C O A O 0 Q� C LL N N � 0 EM y 0o t 0 V � = d c t0 n n C •O � O E v oao G1 > cn •- v o cc C T c N E w N N C O o C O A O C LL N N � Q y 0o L9 J d c t0 n n C 0 O 12 0 O 00 U CM N Q N m M N (n a c Z' :3(O c�nUL6 cc H U) D U O CD QUo N O CL) LO 'a 3 L L� cn Page 86 It M co M i v N co N e— N O 2 N r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O C�7 M N LO LO N O O Page 87 mol 1l- Om a a a c c c W m O N 01 M m W W CO N m� W O O C 7 7 m m 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 O O O O M W 1- W W m N �- W d' •'- N W SO m N N m r (1)N (00 (W m m d o O M M0 M M O h It N )O N N h 0) m M o c+i -r_ - -6 te l� 'L )[i I v o vi 'ol m m m N O M M .W m fl M m Wpl� LO W N W M .- m W W r O M O Ct T T N O W f� m y 7 O c c c N Obi 0 O c ccccT cT cT cT cT cT cT cT M M sO{ W O) (M7 m n m o O r� N (NO N N aD cV f� W m W N N N m )O )O to n LL L OD a0 m co CO ( m CO W m m m m m m m r� G cA cA Vi f9 01 01 01 cH 69 Yi 61 vi W Q C N O O O O I- co O m c0 O O O O O O O)O O O O N O n 0) O O O O O m 0 r- W CO O O O O O O O )O m 1- O O O O O 07 m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O 0 m W W W m m m m m u o O M M M o 0 o O o d o o o d o o 0 0 0 M m co M M fn N Q W m W z z z d t r OW) C) C) DI :q: Z IL °D W W a g g a g g g a a g a a g g a g g g g g g g g a a z z z z z z z z z z zzz z z z z z z z z z zzz z M M M M M M M M Cl) O o o o o o N N N N N N N N N 0,)CY,0)(1) aaa 0) 0) m 0) 0) OO O O O N N N N N OD m OD W OO as"a"a"a a� a Page 88 a a a c c c a a a a a a c c c c c c a a a c m c a a a a a c c c c c a a a a a a a c c c c c c c aa a a a c c c c c C 7 7 m 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 4/ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL E a) w 0 a) d a) ) d m m m d d a) d m m a) m ai d d d d m d m m d y g 15 1-, il- il- -2� LY .L 15 16 1 15 .LK ie- -?5 -r_ - -6 te l� 'L il-C - l- m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m c T T T TN T T T T T T T T T c c c C NN N N NT cC c c ccccT cT cT cT cT cT cT cT NT cNT NT NT N c r n v m v m n m o O r� W 0) OD m f0 W W m W N N N m )O )O to n LL L OD a0 m co CO ( m CO W m m m m m m m r� G � W Q C N O O O O I- co O m c0 O O O O O O O)O O O O N O n 0) O O O O O m 0 r- W CO O O O O O O O )O m 1- O O O O O 07 V M M M m m m m m m m m m m CO m CO CO O O O 0 m W W W m m m m m u o O M M M r rn n r t- I- m 0) 0) i0 Lo w W W m m m M M co M M m rn m m rn rn D) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M m co M M fn N Q W m W m N i0 m W W m m m a n r n N n r n m m W m m m W m m m m m m m m m m W W m W W W W W N N N N N M Mr" 2 -.-.- vvvvvv IT IT vvvvv vvvavvv mm mmm E ~ E H c d cmi m U' E o O N V > D Q m c c ayi DNi m w ( a) ° L c ° E m m A 2m c c U U d Z Q o 2 2 z V C a C C m LL q c 7 Z) 7 L LL a° U U 7 LL a C LL a N c a C C C a 7 LL y 7 C LL 7 um LL LL' N C C 7 N LL C C d O N .O X C .O 7 X C a a 7 C m C C 7 a 7 C O C m m m a C C 7 ll E y 0. lL 4. U C yy l� C LL F X C LL- LL N C LL~ lL i'� N E C O O N y > 2 E a) >, 7 O. 2 Cj N LL O f0 7 N LL Z N W 7 m C l- 2 ID t 7 0) O. p LL 2 N E T m 7 )L fn .N O N' E N N N C Y a N U m C > N a d C N N a _ E C N N a N U {p N N C 0) a G Q a C p7 p7 N N Edo N O) 7 0 D) as O 0 GGG... a O N a Q O O 4) 0 0 O U U O Of 0mocn m�v) QmOf(nLL UmwtnCfwLL mSggU o c c o 2' 0 2) 0 2) o 2) O 2' o p m Q N lL N LL N IL N lL N IN N lL N 3 3 3 3 3 F a c N O ch ch C N N N 0 N U d O d d 3 d q q a N CD N N O C L 0 coC c Z > > :C N �° t5 c o o m E E in a E o. 0 7 N y > 0 Q v 0 f C m O co O Cl) N N O C) m m N N N Z J h D O N C O O Q U U U N N a� a Page 88 Page 89 OD OD O O m N co 0) 'Q OD M M N LO OD O N M N M MN M W O N N a) 0) 04 D7 M OD n 0) co M Cl) n n (O (O (1) N N O (O N n (M (O v N C a7 6 0) (n LO O C V O C N n (O M Mn N N (0 st (0 �- n O n (0 n N .- t0 Oct O O N N O O b 0) 0) p 7 C14 N N N N co N N N M M U jl of vi (9 Vi Vi Ol 01 (/i 01 01 01 eN (H (H 61 (N v! (N v_I o 0 3E ar o 0 0 0 0 } O c o 0 0 �` �� tI ¢ Q Q Q Q¢ Q Q Q Q¢ ¢ Q¢ Q¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q¢ ¢ ro p 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z z Z z Z Z Z z z z z W 0 (O N (O N N M h v7 (O N (O 0 (O N N h N v7 M (O (O u7 N (O y a1 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O �I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 7 N (\7 (\7 M (` (`D M (Q7$2 M Q Q M M M (`7 M (` (` (\7 M M M (` (\ a v n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n N n n v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v U U U 10 10 v v v v v v C C 7 C C C C 7 7 7 7 C C C C C 7 7 7 7 7 C C C C C 7 7 7 7 7 C C C C C 7 7 7 7 7 C C C C C 7 7 7 7 7 C 7 y LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL E 3S d m m m a) d a) d d m d d d Yi 5i 5i d m m a) -W Si an d d > 2 i m 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 m 2 2 i i 2 N C T N T T T T a) a) m a) T T T T T N N N N N T T T T T N N N N N T T T T T N a) N al a) T T T T T a) d d w d T N C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 2 2 2 2 g 2 i 2 2 g2 2 2 2 2 2 i 2 2 mm mC 2 2 2C 2C C vl m j co N _ (( (O co (O coN(MO (0r,N LL M OD OD OD OD OD co OD OD OD co C � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl) 0 0 0 Cl) 0 0 0 Cl) 0 Q W O C) N N N N N N O O O O M M M M M a p a LO N O h N co (0 co (D tO n o ao O v v c c v O O O O O v v v v v O c O O v v v v v O O O O O v v v O O O O O O v v v v v v v a 2 N Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N y LL a M n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n n Ol L ` t7 O a7 a7 (D (D co O O (D (0 (0 (0 (0 CD (0 (0 (D a) (D (D (0 (0 a7 (D (0 to O ; C ~ E (� E E ami E } } } } } } N L y Q Q ¢ Q Q ¢ O) U> 9 r N r N (D ca 0 0 m W 0 0 0 0 C L N N N N N N c r c E o 0 o p p o 2 Z U U U U U U v U m m to (O U) u7 n w X O 7 N N N N N X O E ��ppN N NO LL O! (M O) O) O7 0� E Q v o v v o v v 0 v v c v !Cc: ' v v E O > > > > > > > 7 N L (E(pp U LL LL C DEQ `J LL LL C (Ep fJ LL LL C �Ep U LL LL C �Ep LL U LL C U N U C(D LL L) C a) LL U C(D LL U F c a) LL U C y LL U m O 0 7 E d L (D LL Z '0 O 7 E m L la LL Z o 7 E a) L la LL T 2 O 7 E a) L ja LL Z O 7 E d L la LL T Z 0 L E U U U ty� U 'O R. a) U v a a) CL N U (y� U N U w U N O N �(nmaw la O. O N �(nmaw N O L a) lz(nmaw N O �(nmaw N O. O L N Ir(nmaw a) _ a '6 al C C C C C C C OS Q m m In m m (n m y r C O O O O O p 0 N O) 15 h C N mE LL 7 N Cn N a) O EL m Q C Po 0 v « p m N C7 Q CO M N v E H > O m 2 0 N C8 (D m O m OS L555 7 '(D U) i7 C O u! W W 0 C n ti C N 7co C 03 o U (on S M g C > ¢ 2 T NQ 00 O O O O O O O Z E �j O a1(p (.) N N N N N N ¢ 0 Z Z Z z Z Z p O O O p p w U U U U U U Page 89 C d Q 07 � o N N LL r If L M v E 3:B E c � m d U E o L > C1 c A w � C L O C L o N U V y w L m LL E E in O 7IU j _V m } ILII a 0 0 f j Q Q Q Q A pZ Z Z Z C 0 N N N N GI O O O O C m E C VI C 7 LL C 7 O Q Q 7 d E (0 Z r c 0 v U Q 0 C 1010 a a c c c c > > > > LL LL LL LL O O O p nn n n O o 0 0 v v v v N N N N n (z t7 n (O co (O (O L V c c (i LL C xc 5 M c y LL E a� �p LL T 10a CL o N U) In (L N A t0 O N N N O Z Page 90 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: James C. Frost, City Treasurer INITIATED BY: Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director Sandra G. Ramirez, Department Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE CURRENT INVESTMENT SCHEDULE AS OF JANUARY 31, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the attached current investment schedule for the City of Rancho Cucamonga as of January 31, 2020. BACKGROUND: The attached investment schedule as of January 31, 2020 reflects cash and investments managed by the Finance/Treasury Management Division and is in conformity with the requirements of California Government Code Section 53601 and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's adopted Investment Policy as approved by the City Council on February 20, 2019. ANALYSIS: The City Treasurer is required to submit a quarterly investment report to the City Council in accordance with California Government Code Section 53646. The quarterly investment report is required to be submitted within 30 days following the end of the quarter covered by the report. However, the City Treasurer has elected to provide this report on a monthly basis. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Portfolio Management - Portfolio Summary January 31, 2020 Page 91 .� n r�p O N n N 0 m M m Na N O) 7 M O O r O N N r N O! 0 W 04— .- —— fV O N N O ecQ c�i OR � V G � rr": aD r . N O O ] c o� of W N ffV O U co CD 0 M O W O N OI O! y O O q N h< O O e O cM7 0 0 fm0 N .�•- fro m O O O O IL Y; O M O r N co N OrO f m r N IA r r M M pp N O 0 o 61 G m V C Orn M to 1• O N 10 Oi h N 0 Oi N b N O) CO M< N r r O O r Oj O N O tq O M O Vi O 0 C ^ a4m!gcoLOm v Wof w Q N N vECo O V C E N �r O cc e i w O cop C _O O o :Q N O N O M O coO f0 Q) of m {�O � 7n' � N •O O M N M M M Of M a0 M tD eh f0 CD N N LO �Q OCL W Cf N Of O r f0 0 O OD N O r �7 Ii f0 m N [O C 1� O O j � M M dl O Q�pp O O O O M O 0 0 r L O O O N O O O �p O C �j o ii o p� o o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f0 O O O C W N W N O � O PO•f O 1Lq O n N t0 10 N N C 'Q 0 N N g' . C 7 can) « _ C O Y C m C LL C c ^� O p c V t0 H g •N � 0� U Q •�' �� C Lz7 G f%i OF e N 'C 2 LD m e L r$ OC Q C O Z o L m — EI} t2 c +E `0 a c 01 U fL H d M O O Q N H 10- U m w c y E > 'A � U E O °ami' .c U d~ m E vi N L C •'gyp C w O m > O a� n N Q H w m C ci N O O r Q N C — O N E N A N LL 2 L C .N O m O C e a R L o C Q N O c0 r>- y N E N t N (1) C •5-,a O m /0 r `V C m O 1 C a ~ N cJ !0 C r- im C) E e d d w MON!•Z.0 r #A E a C RRR j O o pC O Im N a ON. C e• C N >o, U E t' N 38 L) m(D -Oc L 0 ID ~ L � m 7 «�U c -� CL E m� Ew _=av0gw m O w LD NC > F Z. w Z a 2 p {L N '� L�t LL j $ LO U m E E -0 0 R Q W —Q >a V ! Q o m r' OC rr Page 92 O C dN 5 c N C 1 T O y co 02 CIO r O O p 75' ,' n. V v 0 8 O O N O O N N M V' M V• V• V• 0 O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O ,a... OO O O O O O O O o O O N CA N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M o1 n a � O M W m m M n a n v m C N O 7 O CO n Q O N N� W O m nr fm M I n m O .- ri m 0 11 v N 01 01 O O O N M M O O O O O O M O O O r n CR N m O m W O OR � M M 0 O ai rp 0a o 0 0 o 0 0 0 O m co C N O 7 O O O O O C+f M O 9 1+1 O O O r n O O ai rp M 001 001 O O 1+m1 mCp M7 ui N N Yf 10 N c a N N o W Q Q m Cd m m m G3 Z Z Z Cl vi COO 0a o 0 0 o 0 0 0 O m C.01 N N O 7 O O O O O C+f M O m OO O O he z ppO ai rp O N N O O O O O W W O O O O O W W O O O Q Q m Cd m m m G3 Z Z Z Cl vi COO > Z v v v v co aoo r`Oi wmi a dap M O o N N N N g i w W w 01 W N N 01 I d o 0 0 o o m w o o O 7 O O O O O M C+f O O O O O O O O he z ai rp O N N O ` O O O O O O O W W O O O Q Q m Cd m m m G3 Z Z Z Z Q�Q ¢ W Vi M > Z Q, V' d• V' V' N N N N O Ol M CA W N O o z g i w W w } U n la. !A ❑W Z el ¢ m O Q 7 a dIU N N N O C N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n M N O n m N N 0 O1 M N O O O M O Of CD m CO O CO W O m m M M O O O O m m m O O O O O O O O O O n O 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 In O O O O O CA N O O O O O O m O O O o co o M aD m o 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 O CO O t0 01 N O O O O O O n O O O O 0 O m Q m 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O O O O V' O CA Q O O O O O O O V' O O O V V .- CO - v N N co co IT IT 0 v v 1 Om1 Cn0 VN' N Om1 COO CO N VM. m m O N 10 1n N C'7 Cl C�7 10 n n 00 fV > O n 0 O m M CA W n V' Cl! n C C V b O M O O O O Oml OM1 O O O m O 0 0 0 0 b 0 CA to 0 N N M M r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 C O O O C C C O O O C O O C O O 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 O O OO O O O O O O O O O0 O O O O 1 O O O O 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O O O O O CA O O O O O O O o 0 C 1 o O O o o N o o O 0 o O O o 0 1 V' v - V' �- — V' N N Cl) M 0 v V' m V• v rn V 0 N N W co co rol he z ai rp O Z n le JLL Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y !A 01 z ca a S ~ Q Q m Cd m m m G3 Z Z Z Z Q�Q ¢ W Vi > Z (n 2 J J W LL,m U Q Q z g i w W w } U O 0 0 U e !A ❑W Z el ¢ m W em Zy LL 0 ❑ m Q Q Jy m Q S w v U v CQ7 � F �c 0 O wc O N V w c �c 1 O O CA O -a O r r r O O � a f.1 U a Q d a o n � N N N N O C N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O n M N O n m N N 0 O1 M N O O O M O Of CD m CO O CO W O m m M M O O O O m m m O O O O O O O O O O n O 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 In O O O O O CA N O O O O O O m O O O o co o M aD m o 0 0 0 0 o n o 0 0 O CO O t0 01 N O O O O O O n O O O O 0 O m Q m 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O O O O V' O CA Q O O O O O O O V' O O O V V .- CO - v N N co co IT IT 0 v v 1 Om1 Cn0 VN' N Om1 COO CO N VM. m m O N 10 1n N C'7 Cl C�7 10 n n 00 fV > O n 0 O m M CA W n V' Cl! n C C V b O M O O O O Oml OM1 O O O m O 0 0 0 0 b 0 CA to 0 N N M M r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 C O O O C C C O O O C O O C O O 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 1 O O OO O O O O O O O O O0 O O O O 1 O O O O 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 O O O O O CA O O O O O O O o 0 C 1 o O O o o N o o O 0 o O O o 0 1 V' v - V' �- — V' N N Cl) M 0 v V' m V• v rn m m n n n ao w rn w w w w m m m 0 N 000000000000 0O000 W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M W n a m 0 M W m 01 f7 n c7 n O O oa0aa000000r00 W U rp t+J W- Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y !A 01 ZZ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Y Y Y ~ Q Q m Cd m m m G3 Z Z Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Z Z Z W U U U U U U U U U U U U U J J J z g i w W w O 0 0 U e ¢ Q Q Q¢ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Z el ¢ m LL LLQ LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL S S S J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J 91999999999999999 za Q O W W W w w W W W w W W W w w W W Z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ LL LL W W LL ILL LLL LL W WLLL ILL W w {wL U. 0 IA c A CL •� Y m m E J E vO V to CL 0 O M O O O m N O m V N m m c _ao=¢¢ 9aQ w v LL LL>> d LLC7 C7 S S Y Y Y Y Y m -j w w w w w w w w w w w w w w¢¢¢ M M M M M M M M M M M Cl) M O O O M M M M M co M M Cl) M M M M M M M Pag'6 93 v IL O � wCw, W NE E m N = N VC c r O 0 W M s— 02 �0 C c o o 6 CL t. V C a H 7 a •Im 01 Cc Q m d ONO ON0O7 NOM NN ONN NN NN NN N N O N N O O N N 0 N NN N N v v Q OOOOOOOO O N N N O O O O O OO O O O O N N N N N N0PN N O .- N C� NN N N N N N w o 0) �n m rn m m w c� r, c`8 m c� cn w c� n O o 0 0 0 0 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 n N N O 0 M N O A N M 0 b N N N a m m n M m N N M CONl) m a m N V n� N n m O fO Of W W m �t P .-- — m M� m� 1 - N N m O O O O O M O O O O O O N O M I O O O O O O O O O p M M O O N 1O n WO 0 )O WO O N N v M 0 m 0 0 0 0 N O I A N m N N m O m m O O" m O m n n O O O O n M N 7 m OR M N N N — — — .-— — — .-— N N OV OV N � � .- r m m m m m m m m m m m m m m W m m m m m m m m m m a.2.2a�a.2aa-�.2aa�2aaaa�2.2a-� � �a O O O O O O w O O O O o w w O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 w N O O O O n n h O tO O O N N N w O M O O O O N O n N m N N m O) m m O O N m m m n n O O O O n O N m O� N N - - - .- - - .-- a- - - N N N N N � - � � .-- O O O O O m O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O D1 O O O O O O O O O O C G O C C 07 O o C C 0 C O C fV C O G o 0 0 0 0 0 C O O O O O m O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O O O O N O O O O O O O O O O' O O O O O W O O O O O O O O O N O O O O V' O O m O Oi O O O N O O O O O O QO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O O O O cicmvv M co m m aLv co v m v M M v wi v v V v m M m m N N 07 M � 0 0 N m M m O N m N N m N (0 n n m M M n '- N v n O n )O n a m M N LO m m m i0 0 N m M N 0 a) O. 0 N 0 iG ac C 0 f. n m M OO N cO N M r- n m O m n M n m m M n M m W O r O m N LLD m N N .- M O N N h 'Q IO W m N MIq V: O M m n m Oi aD n 0 W a N OC) O O M O O O m 0 Om7 N W O N O 0 0 < 0 C C C N 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 M O O O O M O W O (3 O M� M�� M M M M M �O• � M st M M M �t M� M M M m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C C Ct 0 0 C 0 0 Ct Ct C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O LO O O M O O O O O O O O O O M O 0 0 0 0 m n m 0) rn w w w m m m n n n n m a rn rn rn m m m m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O O m m ��t{ r f� �_ O m m � 0 0 O� co OD O IO N m m f� .N{ ( O Np o O N mN O a a 0 a .�- a o 0 o O o o n O O O o am a: a O. a as a a as m w w w w w w w w w w w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U F F H z z z z Z z z z LL' a' w S S00000000000OZ Z z 2 Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i� i� 5 J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W J J J J J OOOOo00o00000000000011Z1ZZ S 2 S 2 S 2 S S S S S S 2 2 2 S 2 S S S J 4J 4J qJ qJ qJ QJ QJ qJ QJ qJ QJ 4J QJ QJ JQ 4J QJ qJ QJ qJ qJ QJ J qJ W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ W w W W W w W w W W w W W W W W w W W W w W W W W LL LL w 11. LL W LL LL LL W LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL OC a 7 C1 n N m M m m n n rn n m rn n M m m m m o m n N N M M c7 N m n m m m N N M M M N� �O m st V C QO m ' m C N O M m p n t0 M O V7 O m n C N w M m 0 > N LL Q _ F n t0 CJ b m M niO�UxN� gaam >>cn ,oyac�xcnOAmx O Q W CD (, S S S m 0) a m m m m F D 7 N M M M 0 a a a a a a a a C7 C7 C7 a 0 0 0 C7 0 CD 0 0 0 0 C7 0 0 U. M M M M M M M M fh fO fO M M M M M M M M M M M M M M f7 P9 M M M M M M M M M N Of h 4 O r v 01 r 0 C0 w C 4 O O N N N N O O O O N N N Na O O M mm M O m M a O N m M (14 M 1I N fV N N N U) O O U) N O O N 00 N O m C F O w) n v) m U d OD N GoI d1 N N N N N N N N F 0) m 0) W Pag' 94 m m m m 0 00 0 N N N N M O r O a O H A OA N W M n r w w w w 00 O O z z z z m m L y L QN QN Qy a W W Q R IR ir 9 H F- H 9 a co y co N W > > 7 7 N H C F O w) n v) m U d OD N GoI d1 N N N N N N N N F 0) m 0) W Pag' 94 N N cm c C ++ m S w CN E m NCD m N C > V C " `w M a _ o 0 0 "' I g ctl 0 0 C �Da�aaa O O S C O .O 0 0 0 0 0 �a ro (� a a' m uD 0 mm O C 100 m � a aB; N N O S r r 100p 0 q CN N Of 04 04 04 O N N A u� co C to N N N N N N 100 o eo10 o 0 0 "' I g I �Da�aaa O O S O Cno S � N10 pp 0 0 0 0 0 0 1010 t10 O m uD 0 r 100 100 O to O 1010 � O M 1010 0 O S coo M O m N 0 cn N N N A ' OD a0 n {+� R C C I 0 0 0 0 0 0 r N N N N M I N I z I 10�O o o 0 0 0 0 0 o S N C4pp H N COD 10010_ M COO O � 7 COO 10010 O O O O O w O W co N N N N O O M -V O 1010 M 0 I mOAI .0 10010 O m O S 0 V: t'0 Cr4 40 fit P 'Q O COD COD CIS N cm U pp ClM O O W O S O '" CD to N Y! R M 1010 O 1010 N N N N O S r r 100p 0 q V 'Q O O N A u� co C to to 100 t0 eo10 t010� S w S cc OOi M tto a) aba O O S O Cno S � N10 pp 0 1010 t10 O O 0 0 IS 100 100 O to O 1010 � O M 1010 0 I m N 0 O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 S yN z 10�O o o 0 0 0 0 0 o S N C4pp H DaD 10010_ M O O O O O O w O W CD 100 O O O M -V O 1010 M N I O .0 U. to n rn rn n ao aD N N N N N N N N O O n g a Baas 0 0 0 0 0 0 A � O t0 8 N n V to z z It O O N a a 0 0 U U 0 m Z Ol z g Z O O y LLI J J J LU O jr O a as a 0- v v Q w 7 N r r I,,-- W O A O z M uni Y > CO U Q m m❑ yC( C7M C, OD CD N 1010CO O CD C10 w D1 Of V o 0 o OUi LO rn N N N N N N N N N N O v O 0) N n V � OD 0 0 0 0" M r-: O I N N N 10V N aa��l O O O O fV fV fV 10V O O O O N O 100O O pr V m O O O fD N O O O! S o o n r m 100 LO N LO O A n N CD 100 O 1010 Oi 100 N 4 S N a0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O a 0 1 O O o 0 0 0 O o t0 LO o O o 0 0 NN _N N N N W t6 ca O6 ca z z z z n 0 0 0 0 4 U U U U w R' w 0: N y U) y Z z z z 0000 w w w w m w w W Ir m Y Y Y Y z z z z J J J J O F F F H c Z z Z Z w 49A H IR w CD CD CD O O O O CL S 001 S W N v v v LO a A Pao 95 g < I z 0 to O LL 0 U m 0 S W S z m H DaD ani zQ Q O .0 U. v 5 w U cc 41 N c � I V Co Q O � C Y (p V m Cal A o V O Em 3 co a IL I v N n V to z z It O O N a a 0 0 U U 0 m Z Ol z g Z O O y LLI J J J LU O jr O a as a 0- v v Q w 7 N r r I,,-- W O A O z M uni Y > CO U Q m m❑ yC( C7M C, OD CD N 1010CO O CD C10 w D1 Of V o 0 o OUi LO rn N N N N N N N N N N O v O 0) N n V � OD 0 0 0 0" M r-: O I N N N 10V N aa��l O O O O fV fV fV 10V O O O O N O 100O O pr V m O O O fD N O O O! S o o n r m 100 LO N LO O A n N CD 100 O 1010 Oi 100 N 4 S N a0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 C 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O a 0 1 O O o 0 0 0 O o t0 LO o O o 0 0 NN _N N N N W t6 ca O6 ca z z z z n 0 0 0 0 4 U U U U w R' w 0: N y U) y Z z z z 0000 w w w w m w w W Ir m Y Y Y Y z z z z J J J J O F F F H c Z z Z Z w 49A H IR w CD CD CD O O O O CL S 001 S W N v v v LO a A Pao 95 m a.& / a % $ 0 / ff § o■ IL § � f ■ �W) > m 2 � Lkv)O ^Ld$ § ■ Go # 4 c') K k e ° 2 ■ 2 § s ■ ® cc E � 2. CR � ■ 0 § C.) 2 S § c O o a � o 75 c - § a. : CL � f U a 22 IOME§ q ° 2� / c § & > o � � . I § § § � ° Pad 96 r IL 91 aol M I gl �I O� 9 �I M A Of E A OC O N pNap t0 Npp OOJ 01 MOL M O/ 1fO1(�� Q N 1S�TO CO Ol L 61. C1 W M M a' g 0 E = 0 �p Q W V I 1f� fO YI U 0 to c cc � C� O C N L O COI N o0 O O v co �a c O OO S aol M I gl �I O �I M A Of /p A OC S N pNap t0 O OOJ 01 MOL M O/ 1fO1(�� Q N 1S�TO CO Ol A N A1 A 01 W M O O A I j < W V I 1f� fO YI M N Page 97 OS O S O S 0 0 0 S Oa pf C OI O Q O O0 O O O (V O COI O O co eN4 Q O OO S 00 p co 47 O O O r r I N N 07 M N N O I O M M O O O O O O O O O M M I O O O O O S O O O S O S O O O O) Of at O O S p A O A N N N O N cm r I t0 O � O 04 O 04 O O O CQ CN CN C', N CC -04 N 515, M N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o n } O CRCRC Y Y Y g m D m Z z pQp o o ¢co o w w z F Z' LL O Q O Z — C07 _ �g W Z g .9 O = Q LL J J J � �ILu � S CO)a4�� LutE LU CO LUW W W O c g O c c V O d C CCL LL O m C Z O N M C CL p aoo Z c ^ 7 O C) Gc a v c w w Nco m° 0 a o E J °D M lei M y0 M •7 V A 0 0 1 M M v v V) co v}i U 1 �i �2 a c}n Page 97 N O N O N M O m �p 0 Q. a t v � � C �! O v N O p N 4. a v � c M i e� a° u� c y w d S d H V N C4 Q N t0 A M A ri N 3 Page 58 m cm O O E •— 00 y V O Ua E O O sv C O CIS - o 0 ,�:, a 0 O O N M c V/ c 0 N E w N N 0 >,C04 �c V v OO l U O a c ti ori «= rn N 0 a c Q N Y O O (O p D m V �O J 0 m 100 C N 2 E m I N O BZ O Li N U _ O- fC ti V/ c 0 U �c V v OO l U O N � (D � C CL Q N 0 NUol S Q 0 d rn N of CD CD 'T Li N Page 99 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LO M N N O O It 12 m M m a� M i R m N r N L C O m N r u N C O 2 m N c Page 100 O N O N O W W m O M W Of N M O W S8 M W O0f co Cl) Cl) Cl) O N rR p^9 rNnhNuAA I�N h m m CIDW O Cl) Cl) Of N W CLfiOpi W W Of W W IIh W Wh� rW LO M O M M W O h r"L C ofLf z rn Of O m Oa C4 Cl) co AN CD N N!7 Of Nt 7 aaaaa Of N a a a c c c M Y! Ml W 19 19 f9 f9 M f9 IA W > > > LL LL LL > > > > > > LL LL LL LL LL LL > > > LL LL LL ao� > > > > > > > LL LL LL LL LL LL LL > > > > > LL LL LL LL LL O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'Z Page 101 g WWW S r r r M M_ M M :2 :: M M M_ Of Of Of Of W .0W Of Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z4N O O O N N O O O O O N N N N N ' WWW ����ir� d aaaaa a a a c c c a a a a a c c c c c a a a c c c a a a a a c c c c c a aaaaa a c c c c c c c a a a a a c c c c c > > > LL LL LL > > > > > > LL LL LL LL LL LL > > > LL LL LL > > > > > LL LL LL LL LL > > > > > > > LL LL LL LL LL LL LL > > > > > LL LL LL LL LL 'Z 'Z q W co 2 2 2 l0 W l0 q q W i f co co W W 10 l0 W q i q l0 W g q W W O O f TTT m q T T T T T T Ei m O g q 0f T T T q O q T T T T T T T T T T T T qcq T T T T qO� C C C C C C 0 0 0 C 0 0 C C OC O O O C O 0mC Cq 0mc cO 0 0 0m OmC Oq O tW0 r h f0 r f0 tW�pp tr0 iW0 N N N r N Lo- LL OD W co t0 co f0 W a0 co co W W co f0 co W W n n p N O r W O h OD O N 0co N O r Of 00000 O r co M a 5000000 10 goo`�o p N Cl)oV, Cl) M M M CO W r r r r r co W co Of Of Ol co co W W co t0 {{pp W W Of W W Of Of 07 01 Of Of 0 m Of Of W t0 W W W p N r LO h m N W 10 W co (D00 M V M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M M M M f7 CO g LL M f00 t00 iW D (00 (WO coWcoW V' V a Y (00 V aD "V77 �T V w w m w w arD w V V a V a R N N N N co co W CO W W ' O �1 q C C W ¢ m -10 12 cc O No O O L g LL. 5 22 �LL c a g'c c E c g a fi '0 LL a a a h a ii 7 p� 7 c 7 LL LL C M c j LL c aj p�f a xx C LL O QCf C LL' a /0 C LLx a C O W W O 00 ELLL l0 LLQ U a yy W a X4X a> > q0 a lL N a c c Q m C �+ Z E 7 O. ~ LL O l0 7 q~ LL 2 W 7 m_ LL C LLL Z W YS 7 q H IL $ r 'S LL 2 m E T LL q Qa ° a 0 c 7 c SC� lla .1q U) o LL aa U �E ¢ a e C LM N W W W N 0 LLNq N q q q q q 3 3 3 3 3 3 s F d C6 0 N y G m O O N q �Q N l0 C 2 0 E E �g c 0 c Q w .1 � E E c Z p CO m ¢ E d _CL o 0 m 2 df O N c l0 q tlyml '� N N Z J O p p O) N ¢ U a U N N Page 101 Page 102 N N V a O OV co Y N M f7 00 O R N O f0 t0 M OD r r N 0) �O 0 W) N �O r-_ M m V �O M Of fV c; N N r pNppp N N O N OD Of (0 N IZ <D W Of M N Ol a 0) r p� 00 Of �1 N N O O 0 Of 01 N N M l0 O LO N N �rpj M vP ' M Cl) M! 19 fA V! M V! h <A tl! M tl! M H M Y! h ee 0 0 0 O O O O 0 O } C O O O O y1 L O N CC, O O O O O N N N N N O O O O O N N N N O O O O O N N N N C24, O O O O O N N N N Z.! O O O O O N N N N N O N o m 0 Z,45 0 0 0 0 0 0 'O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d N < m m <i M <\ p M n In n n fz M - M M M is r Izz h n M M M M l\'7 h n r r 0 M M M M <\ 0 n n I� n r (` n n n a C a a a a C C C C a a a a a C C C C C a a a a a C C C C C a a a a a C C C C C a a a a a C C C C C a C LL 7 7 7 7 LL LL LL LL 7 7 7 7 7 LL LL LL LL LL 7 7 7 7 7 LL LL LL LL LL 7 7 7 7 LL LL LL LL LL 7 7 7 7 7 LL LL LL LL LL 7 LL W W W W W W W W W co W W W W W co W W W W W W W W W W o m m m m m m m m m m m m m o 0 o m d m m m c o m C c c c c 2 2 2 2 c c c c 8 c c c c c c c c c c c c c c 2 c 2 2 2 2 g i 2 2 2 2 2 2 202 20 2 N01 LO W) ID P,CD U) LO <p0 <O CD co M <00 n M OD 00 00 00 OD 00 O OD co co W Im OOOv O Ov O Ov Oa O Nv o N M O Q pNO N N N N Ov OO Ov O Cl)OM co O OO O OpO < V V O to 0 Lf) N N (D wO o O OC v a v v v v vM v v v v v v v v v a v a _ N Q N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N! N N WLL - �r�rr <0 <D OD <0 <O rrrnr O <0 <0 O <0 nrnnn <0 t0 <0 <0 <D nrnr:r <O <0 <0 <0 OO rrrnt.r <0 <0 OD <0 O n <D F L C y Q Q Q Q Q Q N C 'pCC N r r N k LL LIV 1 0 W G O N N N N 0 L g LL O LL D Q W W U U U U U U O 00 r LL o N N a N ; N N N W E WE CU Ol Cl W +W. N o c LL LL C o c LL7< lL o a LLx tL a o a a I LL LL a c a a Sr- m Ly LL a 0 h m Nx d IL W a W a C 7 'O ~C 7 7 a �W 7 Q U i- C m LL U f C W U f- j W W U i_ r W O !L L% �. F W U _W U Q a Z0 LL iNyS a 20 LL <rCf a�ja o ��aa�jj LL Z L ��aa�jj LL Z t W O CU C 6. O d W a O L m W a O m W O m CW U �tgmLLK U) CL o U0 co a U) w ca 0. LL �+ e W Y m rW Y r Y W Y W C W N m m m m m W CC O O C O C O C O C O N F d U > j D 7 > j N O N C S a W e `o a Q c}y W O 07 C lEWp U N m (' Z y C.) Or- gi L o °a N C a Qw Q N g g y a m O O q O O O N W do do p 8 Q N N N N N �0 Z Z Z Z Z o Z W U U U U U U Page 102 a N N LL C M W 7 � m � O C C C � w o r 's s r LL W E E OA OA n cq oof N N N c co w � T r N TTp N H N O O W) h h O OO O N N N N M m M M n iz i -I n V C C C C 7 7 L 7 LL LL LL LL �� � co W W W 07 m W m cc c c 0 0 0 0 N co co P, n n n 0 0 0 0 N N N N n n r r fo co w fo C C U. LL C C mF IL LL S+ O D G Z mmoa. Page 103 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Darryl Polk, Director of Innovation and Technology SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A FIVE-YEAR AGREEMENT WITH INTELESYSONE, INC. FOR TELEPHONE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve a five-year maintenance and support agreement with IntelesysOne, Inc. for the City's ShoreTel phone system in the total amount not -to -exceed $218,450 over the term of the agreement, including $170,950 in total for annual maintenance and support, $12,500 for BrightMetric dashboard monitoring and reporting, and $35,000 (20%) in total for contingency allowance. BACKGROUND: In February 2016, the Mayor and City Council authorized the purchase and installation of a ShoreTel voice-over-internet-protocol (VoIP) telephone PBX from IntelesysOne, Inc. of Ontario, California to serve as the citywide telecommunications system. This phone system has several server and switching/routing components that require updates, security patching and maintenance, as well as support for break/fix instances. As the original installer of the system, IntelesysOne, Inc. has provided continuous support and maintenance since implementation in 2016. In the 2018/19 fiscal year, DoIT tested the BrightMetric cloud -based monitoring application to provide detailed call accounting and performance reports and determined it met the needs from departments to monitor and evaluate call routing and quality. ANALYSIS: Based the overall performance of IntelesysOne, Inc. in supporting the City's ShoreTel VoIP telephone system, staff recommends the approval of a sole -source agreement in order to ensure continuity of operations. DoIT staff negotiated an 11 % discount and firm -fixed pricing over a 5 -year term with IntelesysOne, Inc. creating a savings of $21,075 over the life of the agreement. This multi-year agreement will also stabilize costs for the upcoming 5 -year period and ensure continued uninterrupted support of the City's PBX infrastructure. FISCAL IMPACT: The total for maintenance and support over the life of the five-year agreement is $170,950, which will be billed annually at $34,190. BrightMetric is an added service under the ShoreTel license estimated not - to -exceed $2,500 per year over the life of the 5 -year agreement. Sufficient funds are budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2019/20 budget under account no. 1217001-5300 (Telecommunications - Contract Page 104 Services) to cover this fiscal year's costs for both services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Entering into a 5 -year agreement with pre -negotiated pricing supports Council's goals for mid-range and long-term planning by creating a fixed cost structure for future budget planning. ATTACHMENTS: Description IntelesysOne Agreement Page 105 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 21 day of January, 2020, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation ("City") and IntelesysOne, a a Telephone System Provider ("Consultant"). RECITALS A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following professional services: ShoreTel VoIP telephone system maintenance and support with no phone phone coverage as outlined in Exhibit A ("the Project"). B. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services described in Recital "A", above, necessary to complete the Project. C. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein. D. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Services. 1.1 Scope and Level of Services. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and professional services described in Recitals "A" and "B" above, including, but not limited to ShoreTel VoIP telephone system maintenance and support with no phone coverage, all as more fully set forth in the Consultant's proposal, dated January 21, 2020 and entitled "Scope of Work", attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as "the Services." In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control. 1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work. Upon request of the City, the Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based v enaor manats PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page I Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 106 upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a revision or revisions to Consultant's compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City's City Manager without amendment. 1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a "Schedule of Performance", if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 1.4 Standard of Care. As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services. 1.5 Familiarity with Services. By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant's risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative. 2. Term of Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be five (5) year(s) and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties signature (the "Effective Date"). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and requirements have been fulfilled. Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in two (2) year(s) increments to a total of seven (7) years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 14 herein. Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager's approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance to all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City. 3. Compensation. 3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant v enaor manats PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 2 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 107 shall not exceed $218,450.00 (two hundred eighteen thousand four hundred and fifty dollars, includes a 20% contingency for additional hardware or services), including all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Manager or City Council. City shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions. However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed. The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A. 4. Method of Payment. 4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts. 4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not -to -exceed amounts set forth in Section 3. 4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City. 5. Representatives. 5.1 City Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City's representative shall be Darryl Polk, or such other person as designated in writing by the City ("City Representative"). It shall be Consultant's responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative. 5.2 Consultant Representative. For the purposes of this Agreement, Rick Balzer is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all r enaor manats PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 3 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 108 decisions in connection therewith ("Consultant's Representative"). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Consultant's Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant's Representative shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City. 6. Consultant's Personnel. 6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license as required by the City's Municipal Code. 6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4. 6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees' and subcontractors' wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer's liability, workers' compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services. 6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant's violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6. 7. Ownership of Work Product. 7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, "Work Product"), are considered to be "works made for hire" for the benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without Vendor Initials PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 4 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 109 restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City's reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City's sole risk. 7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law. City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project. 7.3 Title to Intellectual Property. Consultant warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City's use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions. Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City's use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non - infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. r enaor manats PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 5 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 110 8. Status as Independent Contractor. Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Consultant shall fully comply with the workers' compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant's employees. 9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant's covenant under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim. 10. Conflict of Interest. 10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant "financially interested" (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87 100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. 10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of v enaor manats PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 6 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 111 this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have the right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift. 10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited "conflict of interest" under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1. 11. Indemnification. 11.1 Professional Services. In the connection with its professional services, the Consultant shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials, (collectively, "Indemnitees"), free and harmless with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, "Claims"), including but not limited to liability for death or injury to any person and injury to any property, to the extent the same arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of its professional services under this Agreement. Consultant shall pay all reasonable defense costs and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection with such defense. 11.2 Other Indemnities. In connection with all Claims not covered by Section 11. 1, and to the maximum extent permitted by law, the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the acts, omissions, activities or operations of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, subconsultants, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel of City's choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney's fees and experts' costs incurred in connection with such defense. The indemnification obligation herein shall not in any way be limited by the insurance obligations contained in this Agreement provided, however, that the Contractor shall have no obligation to indemnify for Claims arising out of the sole negligence or willful misconduct of any of the Indemnitees. 11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the r enaor manats PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 7 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 112 deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement. 11.4 Waiver of Right of Subro _ ag tion. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant. 11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 11 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee's right to recover under this indemnity provision. 12. Insurance. 12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors. 12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as: (1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code I (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer's Liability Insurance. (4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the City, having, at City's option, an extended reporting period of not less than three (3) years; or professional liability insurance shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after completion of the Services which shall, during the entire three (3) year period, provide protection against claims of professional negligence arising out of Consultant's performance of the Services and otherwise complying with all applicable provisions of this Section 12. PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 r enaor manats Page 8 Page 113 less than: The policy shall be endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent insurable. 12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no (1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers' Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. (4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate. (5) The Insurance obligations under this agreement shall be the greater of (i) the Insurance coverages and limits carried by the Contractor; or (ii) the minimum insurance requirements shown in this Agreement. Any insurance proceeds in excess of the specified limits and coverage required which are applicable to a given loss, shall be available to the City. No representation is made that the minimum insurance requirements of this Agreement are sufficient to cover the obligations of the Contractor under this Agreement. 12.4 Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City and shall not reduce the limits of coverage. City reserves the right to obtain a full certified copy of any required insurance policy and endorsements. 12.5 Other Insurance Provisions. (1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 v enaor manats Page 9 Page 114 Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to Ci . , its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured. (2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Any insurance or self- insurance maintained by City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials shall be excess of Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (4) Contractor shall provide immediate written notice if (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; (3) or the deductible or self insured retention is increased. In the event of any cancellation or reduction in coverage or limits of any insurance, Contractor shall forthwith obtain and submit proof of substitute insurance. Should Contractor fail to immediately procure other insurance, as specified, to substitute for any canceled policy, the City may procure such insurance at Contractor's sole cost and expense. (5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer's right of subrogation against City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials. (6) Each policy shall be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 r enaor manats Page 10 Page 115 A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating Guide. (7) Each policy shall specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be provided. (8) Each policy shall specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits. (9) Contractor shall provide any and all other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement. 12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement including (1) Additional Insured Endorsement(s), (2) Worker's Compensation waiver of subrogation endorsement, and (3) General liability declarations or endorsement page listing all policy endorsements. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance. If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Consultant shall provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance. 12.7 Contractor agrees to include in all contracts with all subcontractors performing work pursuant to this Agreement, the same requirements and provisions of this Agreement including the indemnity and insurance requirements to the extent they apply to the scope of any such subcontractor's work. Contractor shall require its subcontractors to be bound to Contractor and City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to City pursuant to this Agreement, and to require each of its subcontractors to include these same provisions in its contract with any sub - subcontractor. 13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant's performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties. 14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10) days prior written notice to v enaor manats PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 11 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 116 Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party. Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes. 15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant's and City's regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this Section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this Section. All notices shall be addressed as follows: If to City: Darryl Polk, Director of Innovation and Technology City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 If to Consultant: Rick Balzer, Principal InelesysOne 3155-B East Sedona Court Ontario, CA 91764 16. Non -Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. v enaor manats PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 12 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 117 17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant's obligations hereunder without City's prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18 Compliance with Laws. Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Consultant performs the Services. CONSULTANT is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., ("Prevailing Wage Laws"), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "public works" and "maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "public works" or "maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONSULTANT agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at hqp://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm CONSULTANT shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant's principal place of business and at the Project site. CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. 19. Non -Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies. Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default. 20. Attorney's Fees. In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees and costs of experts. 21. Exhibits; Precedence. All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail. v enaor manats PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Page 13 Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 118 22. Applicable Law and Venue. The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court. 23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement. 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above. Consultant Name: IntelesysOne By: Name Title By: Name Date Date Title (two signatures required if corporation) PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Vendor Initials Page 14 Page 119 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES See below PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Vendor Initials Page 15 Page 120 Estimate Prepared For City of Rancho Cucamonga nnNTE LESYS IT for Public Sector I Current Contract Expires February 23, 2020 EQUIPMENT LIST Prepared By Date Prepared [ l f l Maria Vargas December 23, 2019 SHORETEL HARDWARE & SOFTWARE WARRANTY CALCULATOR 1 YEAR 3 5 YEARS Duration 5% YEARS 15% Discount 0% 1 '®/0 0% Additional Shoregear 30 PRICE so ShoreGear 40 $1,95 I I so --so- ShoreGear -so ore ear $1,995 $0 $0 ShoreGear 60 $2,995 50 $0 SO ---- ShoreGear 90 y ShoreGear 120 $2,995 -- $4,995 � $0 0 SAhor ear OT1 A UIUUUC1I- --- - - - .... N ShoreGear 24A $4,495 $3,495 $o so $0 L2 $0 Covera e$ ST 2D ST 200 ST 50A b 0 $4,500 $2,000 _ 1 $328 $311 $293 Contract: Please circle desired term and support 1,180 $1,118 $1,056 2 $983 $932 $880 19 $4s152 3,933 $317T5 ST 100A $3,200 ' 7 $2,447 $2,318 $2,190 ST 1D $3,000 2 $656 $621 ______ $587 Signature Ingate SIParator $2,180 2 $476 $451 $426 Date PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Vendor Initials 4858 4 $187 $178 $168 P 480g $369 898 $36,201 $341296 $32,391 IP 480 $299 ;cV -- - --- IP 480g IP 4858 $369 $429 -- -- --------- so - - - - _.,, $0 Lou � IP 930 Starter Kit -I P 115 - --- ------ ----- ------------- ----- IP 23-0 P 212k $599 $15 9 --- $259 $299 17 $1 1,12 $1,054 $995 ' 0 J 0 IP 655 $749 $0 Satellite Microphones $195 60 so O P 560 BB 424 $349 $349 -- -- _ - 4 - 153 $144 $136 Courtesy License $99 100 $1,025 $968 Essentials License $199 759 $16,501 $15,633 $14,764 Standard License $299 25 $817 $774 $731 Essentials to Advanced Upgrade $300 1 1 $33 $31 $29 Extension Only $140 f 15 14 14 Telephony License $159 131 $21216 $2,156 $2,036 10-ConucrrenT Active Active DirectoryIm ort "on"ere in orts - AUC110 ConT P- - Workgroup Agent License4iz78 $5,000 $1,750 1 $546 $518 $489 1 191 181 171 2 > SIP Device License $30 37 $121 $115 $109 Additional SIParator License SIP Trunk Software $230 $50 T 28 $704 $667 $630 150 $819 $776 $733 Workgroup Supervisor $595 4 $260 $246 $60 Enhanced Paging $5,500 1 $601 _ $569 $538 E911 6 or More $2,200 1 _ $240 - _ _ _ $228 $215 $0 Reinstament Fee 00/0 Annual Annual Support No $0 $0 Covera e$ $ $ 0 0 0 Contract: Please circle desired term and support option (Annual Support or No phone coverage) and sign below. Once we receive the signed contract invoice will be sent. Payment must be received _prior to expiration date or a 20% reinstatement fee will be charged Sign, date and send copy with payment Signature J -9l2� Date PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Vendor Initials Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 16 Page 121 Attachment A — Sample Waiver of Subrogation (Sample Only — Not all forms will look identical to this Sample) TRAVELERS POLICY NUMBER. WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY POLICY ENDORSEMENT WC 00 03 13 (00)-01 WAIVER OF OUR RIGHT TO RECOVER FROM OTHERS ENDORSEMENT We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.) This agreement shall not operate directly or Indirectly to benefit any one not named in the Schedule. SCHEDULE DESIGNATED PERSON: The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or offfcink DESIGNATED ORGANIZATION: PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 r enaor manats Page 17 Page 122 POLICY NUMBER: Attachment B — Sample Additional Insured for On-going Projects COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 20 10 07 04 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED — OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORS — SCHEDULED PERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART SCHEDULE Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) or organization(s): Locations Of Covered Operations The City of Rancho Cucamonga, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or officials. Information required to complete this Schedule, if not shown above, will be shown in the Declarations. A. Section [I — Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for "bodily injury", "property damage" or "personal and advertising injury" caused, in whole or in part, by: 1. Your acts or omissions; or 2. The acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf; in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) desig- nated above. CG 20 10 07 04 B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following additional exclu- sions apply: This insurance does not apply to "bodily injury" or "property damage" occurring after: 1. All work, including materials, parts or equip- ment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed, or 2. That portion of "your work" out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its in- tended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor en- gaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. © ISO Properties, Inc., 2004 PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (non -design) Last Revised: 10/02/13 Page 1 of 1 ❑ Vendor Initials Page 18 Page 123 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Erika Lewis -Huntley, Management Analyst III Justine Garcia, Management Analyst II Sophia Freyre, Healthy RC Coordinator SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AMERICA WALKS GRANT OF $1,500 TO COMPLETE A #BEKINDRC SIDEWALK ART INSTALLATION. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the America Walks grant in the amount of $1,500 for the #BeKindRC Sidewalk Art installation; and allocate $1,500 in grant funds to the Healthy RC Revenue Account 1218000-4740 as well as to appropriate $1,500 into Account No. 1218107-5200 for costs associated with this project. 13 44TI CaafT L I ll� The Healthy RC Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program is an initiative that works to make it safe, convenient, and fun for children to walk and bicycle to and from school. Since 2011, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has partnered with over 30 schools to promote walking and bicycling to school, improve safety, and increase health and physical activity. In recent years, the City's SRTS Program has gone beyond traditional methods of promotion by incorporating art and placemaking projects to encourage children and families to walk and bike. Placemaking helps people to feel connected to a space and greater community, and has demonstrated physical, mental, and social health benefits. America Walks is a nonprofit national organization that is leading the way in advancing safe, equitable, accessible, and enjoyable places to walk and move by giving communities the resources to effectively advocate for change. They provide organizations with strategy support, training, technical assistance, and grants to further their mission of making every community a walkable community. Their Community Change grant program works to provide support to the growing network of advocates, organizations, and agencies using innovative programs and projects to create change at the community level. In October of 2019, the City of Rancho Cucamonga applied for the America Walks Community Change grant and was one of 19 grantees selected from over 400 applicants nationwide. The City has been awarded $1,500 to complete a #BeKindRC Sidewalk Art installation. ANALYSIS: In 2018, the City of Rancho Cucamonga hosted CommUNITY Paint Day where residents came together to paint a community designed mural in an intersection near Los Amigos Elementary School. This project increased community connections and physical activity in the Southwest Cucamonga neighborhood. Due to the success of this project, the City is interested in continuing to use public art and placemaking as a strategy to create enjoyable places for children and families to walk and be physically active. Page 124 The #BeKindRC Sidewalk Art installation will target the Rancho Cucamonga Middle School (RCMS) neighborhood to encourage walking and promote compassion for students, parents, and residents alike. The City will partner with Healthy RC's Compassionate Communities Subcommittee, Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, and Arts Connection - San Bernardino County's Public Art Council, to develop key project elements such as messaging and artwork design. The project will consist of small, temporary paintings on the sidewalk that will act as eighth (1/8) mile markers. The artwork will include positive messaging that encourages compassion in both English and Spanish. Since many RCMS students walk to school, the starting point will be at RCMS and span a one -mile radius around the school. This project is designed to encourage physical activity, increase community connections, and promote compassion and positivity. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval of the grant funds, $1,500 will be allocated to 12180000-4740 as Grant Income and appropriated to 1218107-5200 Healthy RC Program Grants -Operations and Maintenance. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the following City Council Goal(s): ENHANCING PREMIER COMMUNITY STATUS: The #BeKindRC Sidewalk Art installation will support the City's efforts in building a community where residents feel connected and generations lead healthy, resilient lives. Page 125 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Erika Lewis -Huntley, Management Analyst III Hope Velarde, Management Analyst I Clarence de Guzman, Community Programs Coordinator SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE A CONTRACT WITH KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,000 FOR THE YOUR MIND MATTERS MOBILE UNIT PROJECT. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve a contract with Kaiser Foundation Hospitals in the amount of $25,000 for the Your Mind Matters (YMM) Mobile Unit project; and allocate $25,000 in grant funds into the Healthy RC Revenue Account 1218000-4740 as well as appropriate $25,000 into Account No. 1218107-5200 for costs associated with the development of the project. BACKGROUND: Rancho Cucamonga, through Healthy RC's comprehensive strategic planning and community engagement process, has identified mental health (e.g., anxiety, stress, depression, etc.) as one of its top community health priorities. As a result, Healthy RC established a Mental Health Subcommittee that has dedicated the last several years to developing targeted strategies to improve mental health citywide. The "Your Mind Matters" mental health campaign was initiated to formally organize community conversations around mental health, while increasing awareness and reducing the stigma around the issue. Other strategies include mental health symposiums, resource fairs, and educational materials targeting a wide range of ages, genders, and ethnicities. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals released an RFP earlier this year for its Community Benefit Grant Program which supports direct services that improve the health and well-being of the communities within its service area. Kaiser Permanente's 2019 Community Health Needs Assessment Report for the San Bernardino County Service Area identified mental health as a priority health need in the western region. In an effort to enhance the City's mental health strategies, Healthy RC applied for the Community Benefit Grant Program and was awarded $25,000 for the Your Mind Matters Mobile Unit. This retrofitted van will travel across the city to promote mental health and wellness -related resources, raise awareness, and organize community events in partnership with mental health professionals. ANALYSIS: The YMM Mobile Unit will be deployed citywide, however, targeted strategies will be developed for historically underserved and vulnerable communities which have shown higher rates of mental health challenges. Vulnerable populations include the economically disadvantaged, racial and ethnic minorities, the uninsured, low-income children, teens, the elderly, people experiencing homelessness, Page 126 and those with other chronic health conditions. The project will build on the existing YMM campaign by Healthy RC and seeks to: (1) improve access and connection to mental health care in community settings and (2) reduce mental health stigma and improve knowledge, capacity, and resilience in individuals, communities, and organizations. To fulfill this, the YMM Mobile Unit will utilize the following intervention strategies: (1) organize `mobile' community conversations that aim to destigmatize mental health, (2) provide educational materials and collaborate with mental health professionals to increase community members' knowledge and understanding of mental illnesses, and (3) promote, connect, and refer residents to currently available resources in order to close the gap in access. The grant is effective from January 2020 to December 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The City will receive $25,000 in grant funds for the development of the YMM Mobile Unit project. Staff time was identified as in-kind match. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the following City Council Goal(s): ENHANCING PREMIER COMMUNITY STATUS: The YMM Mobile Unit project will support the City's efforts in building a community where generations lead healthy and resilient lives. MID AND LONG RANGE -PLANNING: The project supports the City's vision of continuing to foster a holistic environment where people come to live, work, and play. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Kaiser Foundation Hospitals Contract Page 127 LETTER OF AGREEMENT KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS, ONTARIO COMMUNITY BENEFIT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS PROGRAM This Letter of Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") is entered into by and between Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, a California nonprofit, public benefit corporation (hereinafter "KFH") and City of Rancho Cucamonga, a charter city organized in the State of California and not subject to federal or state income tax. This Agreement sets forth the understanding of the parties hereto as to the terms and conditions under which KFH shall donate funds in the amount of $25,000.00 for a one year funding period beginning 1/1/2020 through 12/31/2020 for Your Mind Matters (YMM) Mobile Unit. Such terms and conditions are as follows: 1. Tax Exemption Status: Grantee represents that at all times relevant herein, it is a charter city organized in the State of California and not subject to federal or state income tax. 2. Purpose of Grant. Grantee shat l use entire Grant to support the specific goals, objectives, activities, and outcomes as stated in the Grant Summary. 3. Expenditure of Funds. This Grant (together with any income earned upon investment of grant funds) is made for the purpose outlined in the Grantee's Work Plan and may not be expended for any other purpose without KFH's prior written approval. 4. Prohibited Uses. In no event shall Grantee use any of the funds from this Grant to (a) support a political campaign, (b) support or attempt to influence any government legislation, except making available the results of non-partisan analysis, study or research, or (c) grant an award to another party or for any purpose other than one specified in Section 170(c)(2)(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended. 5. Return of Funds. KFH reserves the right to discontinue, modify or withhold payments to be made under this Agreement or to require a total or partial return of any funds, including any unexpended funds under the following conditions: (a) If KFH, in its sole discretion, determines that the Grantee has not performed in accordance with this Agreement or has failed to comply with any term or condition of this Agreement. (b) If Grantee loses its status as an eligible Grantee under Paragraph 1 above. (c) Any portion of the funds is not used for the approved purpose (d) Such action is necessary to comply with the requirements of any law or regulation applicable to Grantee or to KFH or to this Grant. 6. Records, Audits and Site Visits. KFH is authorized to conduct audits, including on-site audits, at any time during the term of this Grant and within four years after completion of the Grant. Grantee shall allow KFH and its representatives, at its request, to have reasonable access during regular business hours to Grantee's files, records, accounts, personnel and client or other beneficiaries for the purpose of making such audits, verifications or program evaluations as KFH deems necessary or appropriate concerning this Grant. Grantee shall maintain accounting records sufficient to identify the Community Benefit - Letter of Agreement Kaiser Tracking number for this grant..' donation is 104396 1 of 4 Page 128 Grant and to whom and for what purpose such funds are expended for at least four (4) years after the Grant has been expended. 7. No Assignment or Delegation. Grantee may not assign, or otherwise transfer, any rights or delegates any of Grantee's obligations under this Agreement without prior written approval from KFH. 8. Records and -Reports. Grantee shall submit written progress report(s) to KFH in accordance with the due dates stated on the Grant Summary (Attachment). Grantee shall be primarily responsible for the content of the evaluation report. If KFH determines IRB approval is necessary, as part of the evaluation process, Grantee shall follow KFH IRB approval processes and procedures. 9. Required Notification. Grantee is required to provide KFH with immediate written notification of any change in Grantee's tax exempt status or when Grantee is unable to expend the grant funds for the approved purposes described in the Work Plan. 10. Identification of KFH. Grantee shall identify KFH as a supporting organization in all published material relating to the subject matter of this Grant. Whenever possible and appropriate, Grantee shall publicly acknowledge KFH for this Grant. 11. Equal Employment Opportunity. Grantee agrees to comply with and be bound by the nondiscrimination and affirmative action clauses contained in: Executive Order 11246, as amended, relative to equal opportunity for all persons without regard to race, color, religion, sex or national origin; the Vocational Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, relative to the employment of qualified handicapped individuals without discrimination based upon their physical or mental handicaps; the Vietnam Era Veterans Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974, as amended, relative to the employment of disabled veterans and veterans of the Vietnam Era, and the implementing rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Labor in Title 41, Part 60 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). 12. Immigration Act Requirements. Grantee shall comply during the term of this Agreement with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and any regulations promulgated thereunder. Grantee hereby certifies that it has obtained a properly completed Employment Eligibility Certificate (INS Form I-9) for each worker performing services related to the program described in the Work Plan. 13. Licensing and Credentials. Grantee agrees to maintain, in full force and effect, all required governmental or professional licenses and credentials for itself, its facilities and for its employees and all other persons engaged in work in conjunction with this Grant. 14. Payment of Grant. First payment by KFH will be contingent upon a signed Agreement between KFH and Grantee. Subsequent payments (if any) are contingent upon compliance with this Agreement, including timely receipt of reports as outlined in Paragraph 8 above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. Community Benefit - Letter of Agreement Kaiser Tracking number for this grant, donation is 104396 2 of 4 Page 129 Kaiser Foundation Hospitals By: 12/23/19 Greg K. Christian Date Senior Vice President, Area Manager Grantee . By: John ' 1sori Date City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Benefit - Letter of Agreement Kaiser Tracking number for this grantdlonation is 104396 3 of 4 Page 130 LETTER OF AGREEMENT Attachment GRANT SUMMARY GRANT NUMBER: 104396 DATE AUTHORIZED: December 18, 2019 GRANTEE NAME: City of Rancho Cucamonga AMOUNT: $25,000.00 over 12 months CONTACT, TITLE: Hope Velarde, Management Analyst TELEPHONE: 909-774-2007 CB PROJECT MANAGER: Martha Valencia Phone: 909 427-5268 Email: martha.r.valencia@kp.org GRANT PURPOSE: Your Mind Matters (YMM) Mobile Unit GRANT OVERVIEW: Roll out the "Your Mind Matter Campaign" via a Mobile Unit, that will travel across the city to promote mental health and wellness -related resources, raise awareness, and organize community events in partnership Chaffey Joint Union High School District, Cucamonga School District, Los Amigos Elementary, Central and Alta Loma School District, and the Mental Health Task Force. The expected reach is 1, 000 youth, adolescents, and families by: l) organizing 'mobile' community conversations to reduce stigma about mental health illnesses; 2) provide educational materials; 3) connect/refer community to available resources/services. GRANT OBJECTIVES: • AlIeviate the stigma associated with mental health. • Increase community members' knowledge and understanding of mental health illnesses. • Bridge the gap in access to appropriate mental health services and resources. GRANT PERIOD: Start date: 1/1/2020 End Date: 12/31/2020 NARRATIVE AND FINANCIAL REPORTS DUE: Requirement I Due Date Final Report 2/1/2021 Community Benefit - Letter of Agreement Kaiser Tracking number for this grant: -donation is 104396 c/ Page 131 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager Jason Welday, Director Engineering Services/City Engineer Fred Lyn, Deputy Director of Engineering/Utilities Deborah Allen, Management Aide SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY ON BEHALF OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL ENERGY NETWORK FOR ENERGY SERVICES, AUDITS, AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR CITY FACILITIES SERVICED BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY (RCMU). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and authorize the City Manager to sign the MOU between the Southern California Regional Energy Network and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City of Rancho Cucamonga joined the Southern California Regional Energy Network (SoCaIREN) in September 2015. This non-profit organization offers support services for energy efficiency projects. Services include comparative energy analysis reports, comprehensive energy audits, and assistance with developing energy efficiency design specifications in coordination with the investor-owned utilities. SoCaIREN coordinates and leverages Southern California Edison's (SCE) and SoCalGas' Core Programs and allows the City to take full advantage of the wide range of programs and services. Successful efforts with SoCaIREN include updated energy audits and analysis of City facilities serviced by SCE including Central Park, Archibald Library, City Corporate Yard, Lions East and the Family Resource Center. In addition, SoCaIREN was instrumental in submitting the SCE rebate applications for the streetlight retrofit project and assisted with developing the Energy Efficiency Revolving Fund. ANALYSIS: The MOU will enable the City to utilize similar services and benefits for all municipal facilities serviced by SCE or RCMU. The City facilities serviced by RCMU includes City Hall, Animal Care and Adoption Center, Epicenter, Cultural Center, Victoria Gardens Police Substation, Jersey Fire Station, and RC Sports Center. The initial scope of work, along with the fee schedule, is an energy and natural gas audit at City Hall for $15,500. It will create a key list of potential improvements for the facility and provide an overview of the cost benefit analysis. These range of services are especially valuable as the City aims to decrease our greenhouse gas emissions and improve resiliency throughout City facilities. Executing Page 132 the MOU with SoCaIREN complements other energy efficiency efforts that the City has completed. It defines the roles and responsibilities for both the City of Rancho Cucamonga, RCMU, and SoCaIREN for energy efficiency services. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the execution of the MOU. The cost for the initial project is $15,500 which will be funded by the Municipal Utility's Public Benefit Fund (Fund 706). COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: By signing and executing this Memorandum of Understanding, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility will have access to energy services, audits and technical assistance which is a project that enhances Rancho Cucamonga's position as a premier community in our region. ATTACHMENTS: Description Memorandum of Understanding Page 133 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding is by and between the County of Los Angeles, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County"), through its County Office of Sustainability ("COS"), individually and on behalf of the Southern California Regional Energy Network ("SoCaIREN"), and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") for the County to implement certain energy efficiency upgrades in City buildings and facilities, based upon the follow recitals: Recitals R1. The County is administrator of, and the contracting agent for, the SoCaIREN; R2. The California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC") authorized a portfolio of energy efficiency programs and budgets for implementation by SoCaIREN in 2018-2025. Those programs and budgets are reflected in the Energy Efficiency Programs and Budgets Agreement (the "Programs Agreement"). R3. In compliance with CPUC orders, the Programs Agreement designates Southern California Gas Company ("SoCalGas"), individually and on behalf of Southern California Edison ("Edison"), as the fiscal manager for the SoCaIREN; R4. The SoCaIREN seeks to implement energy efficiency programs and initiatives that will lead to long-term, sustainable benefits to participating public agencies throughout the SoCalGas and Edison service areas; and R5. As authorized by the CPUC, the County has the independent authority to design, manage and deliver SoCaIREN programs and initiatives; R6. As authorized by the County's Board of Supervisors on January 15, 2013, the Director of the County's Internal Services Department, or his designee, has delegated to enter into memoranda of understanding with other public entities as may be necessary or desirable to support implementation and administration of any of the energy efficiency programs under the Programs Agreement; and R7. The County and the City desire to leverage the project management and technical service capabilities of the SoCaIREN to assist in designing and implementing energy efficiency projects in City buildings and facilities served by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU); NOW THEREFORE, The Parties further agree as followings: Page 134 I. General Provisions A. The County and City are jointly referred to herein as the "Parties," and individually as "Party." B. The Parties agree that all work contemplated under this MOU related to natural gas and energy efficiency measures and equipment must be consistent with the applicable terms and conditions in the Programs Agreement. C. This MOU shall commence on the earliest date of approval by all Parties, and shall continue to the end of the SoCaIREN program defined under CPUC Decision 18-05-041. The ending date of the SoCaIREN may be impacted by any other relevant CPUC Decisions. D. This MOU applies only to work performed by the SoCaIREN on behalf of City buildings and facilities that are served by Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU). E. Either Party may terminate this MOU for cause or convenience by providing the other Party with thirty (30) days prior written notice. onsibilities of each of the Parties A. County of Los Angeles — Southern California Regional Energy Network 1. County will administer the SoCaIREN pursuant to the terms of the Programs Agreement and will provide energy efficiency upgrade services to the City for all eligible natural gas and electric measures and equipment. 2. SoCaIREN will deliver project analysis, procurement, financing and implementation services and documents for energy efficiency projects. 3. SoCaIREN will provide project management and technical services for eligible natural gas efficiency projects at no cost to the City in City buildings and facilities that are served by SoCalGas. 4. SoCaIREN will provide project management and technical services for electric efficiency projects at no cost to the City in City buildings and facilities that are served by Edison. 5. SoCaIREN will provide project management and technical services for electric efficiency projects on a time and materials cost basis, which will be reimbursed to the County by the City, in City buildings and facilities that are served by the RCMU. 6. The County will submit monthly invoices to the City for labor and expenses related to energy efficiency project work for electric savings in City buildings and facilities served by the RCMU with the following information: subtask description, title of staff providing labor, number of hours worked, date of hours worked, description of work and detailed description of direct expenses with back-up documentation. B. City of Rancho Cucamonga 1. City will provide the name of a City point -of -contact to the County who will be responsible for the City's project management and program administration tasks. 2 Page 135 2. City will participate in the identification of energy efficiency projects and assist in the development of a final Scope of Work and corresponding budget that must be approved in writing by both the City and the County before work commences. 3. City will obtain and share data requested by the County regarding City's municipal building energy usage and other building and facility technical information. 4. City will pay for project management, technical services, and any other agreed-upon services provided by the SoCaIREN for efficiency projects in buildings and facilities served by RCMU on a time -and -materials basis. 5. City will submit payment to the County for services provided under this MOU within 30 days of receipt of invoice from the County. III. INDEMNIFICATION AND RESOLUTION 1. By the County. The County shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, and their respective successors, assigns, affiliates, subsidiaries, current and future parent companies, officers, directors, agents, and employees, from and against any and all expenses, claims, losses, damages, liabilities or actions in respect thereof, along with reasonable attorneys' fees (collectively, "Claims"), to the extent that such Claims arise from or are caused by the County's act(s) and/or omissions(s) related to or in connection with its obligations under this PIOU/SoCaIREN Agreement, the Original this Agreement, or by the act(s) and/or omission of the County's employees, Subcontractors, or agents related to or in connection with this Agreement. By City. City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the County, its Special Districts, elected and appointed officers, employees, and agents, from and against any and all third -party liability (including expenses, claims, losses, damages, liabilities or actions in respect thereof, along with reasonable attorneys' fees) to the extent caused by City's act(s) and/or omissions(s) related to or in connection with its obligations under this Agreement. The obligations of each Party under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 4. If a dispute arises out of, or in connection with this Agreement, the parties agree to meet to pursue resolution through negotiation or other appropriate dispute resolution process before resorting to litigation. All information exchanged during this meeting or any subsequent dispute resolution process, shall be regarded as "without prejudice" communications for the purpose of settlement negotiations and shall be treated as confidential by the parties and their representatives, unless otherwise required by law. However, evidence that is independently admissible or discoverable shall not be rendered inadmissible or non - discoverable by virtue of its use during the dispute resolution process. For the County of Los Angeles Signed: Date: 3 Page 136 For the City of Rancho Cucamonga Signed: Date: Attachment 1: Scope of Work Attachment 2: Budget Attachment 3: Rate Sheet Attachment 4: Invoicing Procedures 4 Page 137 ATTACHMENT 1 MEMORENDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SCOPE OF WORK 1. City facilities under RCMU include: 1. City Hall and PD Substation- 10500 Civic Center Drive 2. Animal Shelter - 11780 Arrow Boulevard 3. Epicenter - 8408 Rochester Avenue 4. Cultural Center - 12505 Cultural Center Drive S. Police Substation - 7743 Kew Avenue 6. Jersey Fire Station - 11297 Jersey Boulevardll 7. RC Sports Center — 8303 Rochester Avenue 2. AUDIT SCOPE OF WORK The SoCaIREN will conduct energy audits and related analyses and deliver energy audit reports as specified in the guiding documents of the program. The initial audit scope of work will focus on the City Hall. The City may request SoCaIREN services be provided at other RCMU city facilities. Task 2.1: Conduct Energy Audits The SoCaIREN will complete site audits to assess the implementation of energy efficiency improvements. If potential cost-effective energy savings opportunities are identified, the County and/or City shall collect the data needed to evaluate and make recommendations for potential retro -commissioning opportunities, energy efficiency measures and assess demand response potential. For retro -commissioning, the SoCaIREN will: • Collect field information related to HVAC set -points, sequences of operation, equipment sequences, hours of operation, and process flow diagrams. • Collect existing equipment data. For Lighting Energy Audits, in areas deemed to have cost-effective energy savings potential, the SoCaIREN will conduct a lighting inventory of each area. If room numbers are not available, the SoCaIREN shall develop an annotated floor plan for each floor that assigns unique designations to each space being audited. The lighting data to be collected may include: • Room number corresponding to room number on floor plan. • Type of space (lobby, conference room, office, storage room, etc.) • Fixture types • Fixture quantities • Lighting controls • Hours of use • Availability of daylight For Mechanical Energy Audits, the SoCaIREN will conduct an equipment inventory that will include the following data as required: • Conduct thorough survey of occupancy and on-site facility operators. 5 Page 138 • Gather and review existing facility documentation (M&O as-builts, service records, utility bills, etc.). • Make, model, nameplate data • Equipment Capacity and efficiency • Schedule and sequence of operations • System performance data • System schematics • Building envelope data • Plug Loads • Process Loads For Demand Response, the SoCaIREN will: • Interview key facility personnel to identify detailed operating characteristics and energy use patterns including major energy using equipment and controls. • Collect and evaluate additional facility data specific to demand response such as interval data, equipment switching and electrical circuiting, and metering. • Perform a demand response assessment and provide a written description of current demand response readiness and recommendations for improvements. Task 2.2: Identify Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs) The SoCaIREN will identify energy efficiency measures. The SoCaIREN will meet with agency staff to discuss the Agency's general policies regarding lighting and mechanical retrofits. Specific measures to be considered include but are not limited to: Retro commissioning • Propose recommended retro -commissioning type scope of work, purpose, goals and budget such as: o HVAC system control improvements o Optimization of control sequences of operation and reset schedules o Refinement or improvement of scheduling control Lighting • Replacement of T8 or T12 lamps with 2nd or 3rd generation T8 lamps and premium electronic ballasts • Replacement of HID lighting with fluorescent lighting • Replacement of incandescent lighting with fluorescent or LED lighting • Fixture upgrades • Daylighting and occupancy sensor controls KAPrhanirnI • Evaluation of cost effective system replacements • Installation of variable frequency drives • Motor replacements • Implementation of variable -air -volume systems • Consideration of building envelope improvements • Consideration of site specific energy saving opportunities • Plug load and process measures A Page 139 Audits are not limited to the above measures. SoCaIREN may include other measure types in the audit analysis based on agency input and findings of the site audit. Task 2.3: Perform Technical Evaluation The SoCaIREN will evaluate EEMs that have been approved by SoCaIREN and the City. The summary table shall show the total savings and costs per measure. For the lighting systems, the SoCaIREN will develop a lighting spreadsheet that lists each unique type of fixture and shows the quantities of each fixture type as required. The lighting spreadsheet will indicate the proposed retrofit for each fixture type and the costs and savings associated with each retrofit in each room. For the mechanical systems, the SoCaIREN will utilize a methodology appropriate to the measure being evaluated, for example, projects with weather related impacts to be evaluated with an hourly or temperature bin simulation method. The presentation of data should contain the identification and location of existing and proposed equipment for each measure and associated costs and savings. The level of detail provided should be proportional to the cost -risk of the project. For example, larger, more complex and costly measures should include more analysis and site measured data than simple and inexpensive opportunities. The level of detail to be performed will be discussed with and agreed to by The SoCaIREN prior to the evaluation effort. Task 2.4: Prepare Draft Audit Reports As directed, the SoCaIREN will prepare a draft report that summarizes the audit results. The report may include the following as directed by the SoCaIREN project manager based on feedback from RCMU: ■ Description of the facilities' energy using systems ■ Discussion of the facilities' annual energy use ■ Description of recommended EEMs ■ Description of current Demand Response readiness and recommended Demand Response improvements. ■ Results of analysis associated with each recommended EEM, including energy savings, energy cost savings, design and construction costs. ■ Assumptions and calculations used in the analyses. The report will be customized based on the requirements of RCMU. The SoCaIREN will prepare for and coordinate a meeting to present the draft report to the City. Task 2.5: Prepare Final Audit Reports The SoCaIREN will prepare a final report that incorporates the City's comments and is delivered according to the agreed upon scope of the report. Task 2.6: Prepare Project Proposal The SoCaIREN will prepare a Project Proposal outlining the project's key financial metrics based on the energy efficiency measures identified in the audit report. Task 2.7: Provide Pathway to Zero Reports As directed by the City, the SoCaIREN will prepare a Pathway to Zero Report to provide the City with high- level information on distributed energy resource and other sustainability strategies. The City will select 7 Page 140 which strategies they would like to include in the report. The report is delivered alongside the Audit report and Project Proposal. These reports are solely available to facilities located within disadvantaged zip codes based on CalEnviroScreen 3.0 criteria. Deliverables • The SoCaIREN will provide Draft and Final Audit reports customized to meet the needs of the City. • The SoCaIREN will provide a Project Proposal with key financial metrics. • The SoCaIREN will provide a Pathway to Zero report at the request of the City, assuming facilities are in disadvantaged community zip codes as defined by SoCaIREN. 3. AUDIT PROJECT MANAGEMENT SoCaIREN will provide project management support for work identified in the Audit Scope of Work. Project management support includes: ■ Project coordination with the City, any assigned consultants, facility staff, and other key team members as required. ■ Project monitoring, control and reporting. ■ Attendance at project meetings and production of meeting minutes as needed. ■ Project oversight of key tasks, project deliverables and quality control in accordance with program ■ Other support tasks as identified by the City : Page 141 ATTACHMENT 2 MEMORENDUM OF UNDERSTANDING SCHEDULE FOR PAYMENTS 1. PAYMENT OF BASE SERVICES A. SoCaIREN work will be performed on a Time -and -Materials Basis. The estimated cost to perform the services set forth in Attachment I "Scope of Services" is $15,500. Notwithstanding this estimate, the City shall pay for all services rendered under this MOU. Estimated costs are based on the table below: RCMU Labor Estimate Labor Type Total Hours* Cost SoCaIREN Project Management 67 $9,000 Project Administration 15 $2,000 kW Engineering Technical Support Services 30 $4,500 Total 112 $15,500 * Assumes project management support for a duration of 5 months. E Page 142 ATTACH EM ENT 3 MEMORENDUM OF UNDERSTANDING TEC & KW ENGINEERING RATE SHEET 1. RATE SHEET SoCaIREN charges will be based on the below hourly rates. 2019 Rate sheet for Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Company Title Hourly Cost TEC Executive $270 TEC Vice President $240 TEC Director $210 TEC Program Manager $175 TEC Sr. Technical Support $160 TEC Accountant $150 TEC Project Manager II $150 TEC Project Manager 1 $135 TEC Analyst $135 TEC Project Coordinator $100 kW Engineering Principal $212 kW Engineering Director $193 kW Engineering Project Manager $177 kW Engineering Senior Engineer II/ Consultant II $166 kW Engineering Senior Engineer/ Consultant $161 kW Engineering Project Engineer $154 kW Engineering Engineer/Consultant $148 kW Engineering Technician/Intern $85 kW Engineering Administrative $62 10 Page 143 ATTACHMENT 4 MEMORENDUM OF UNDERSTANDING INVOICING PROCEDURES 1. INVOICING PROCEDURES The Energy Coalition ("TEC"), as the implementer for the SoCa1REN Public Agency Program, will invoice the County for work completed and the County will be reimbursed by the City. The invoicing procedures adhered to between TEC and the County are included below. TEC's invoice to the County will include any subcontractor costs and program costs relevant to the scope of work outlined in Attachment 1. TEC will submit invoices to the County on the 15t1i of each month. The County will invoice the City according to the amount invoiced by TEC each month. Invoicing Administrative Responsibilities between TEC (Contractor) and the County: Contractors shall adhere to all Los Angeles County (LAC), IOU, and/or CPUC invoicing policies, guidelines, requirements as applicable based on funding source and are subject to change at any time due to compliance directives. Contractors shall make their best effort to implement such invoice requirement changes as directed by LAC not to exceed 2 billing periods unless otherwise directed. Contractors shall be responsible for correctly accounting for all labor and expenses as applicable per LAC guidelines and/or CPUC guidelines, while assuming full responsibility and oversight of all sub- contractor invoicing. When funding source is non -CPUC funds, invoice requirements shall still apply as applicable. Contractors shall adhere to any funding source invoice and reporting requirements. Contractors shall be required to adhere to the following monthly invoicing requirements and guidelines. 4.1.1 Contractors and their sub -contractors are required to use the most recent Invoice Reporting (IR) Tool as directed by LAC staff. 4.1.2 Invoicing shall be monthly and transmitted to LAC no later than the 25th of the month for the prior month services. 4.1.3 Invoicing periods shall be on a calendar basis starting with the first day in the month to the last day of the month. 4.1.4 Invoicing shall include all services rendered in the invoice month including all sub-contractor(s) expenditures. 4.1.5 Invoices for unaccounted expenses, labor, and/or services rendered in periods of performance prior to the current month being invoiced will not be accepted after such months invoice has been approved for payment by County. 4.1.6 Expenses being invoiced shall have been incurred by contractor and/or sub -contractor. 4.1.7 Expenses for events, conferences, etc. shall not be expensed till such event has occurred and all final billings have been paid by contractor and/or sub -contractor. 4.1.8 Deposits such as for event venues, etc. will not be allowed to be expensed prior to the event concluding. All invoices must be final, no estimations will be accepted. 4.1.9 Labor and expenses associated with administrative and marketing tasks which impact the overall SoCa1REN shall be identified as SoCa1REN in the IR Tool. 4.1.10 All labor and expense entries must include a detailed description of the activity being billed for and included for each line as provided for in the IR Tool. 4. 1.11 All expenses must meet County guidelines and receipts shall be provided for all expenses billed as required by County Expense guidelines. 4.1.12 Contractor will assist County with training the subcontractors on invoice requirements and submittal. 4.1.13 Contractors shall be required to provide a monthly narrative with the submittal of their invoice providing a high level report out of all programs managed including YTD goal and/or metrics status. 11 Page 144 12 Page 145 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Darren Chin, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO TRACT NO. 18936 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF CARNESI DRIVE AND EAST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AS COMPLETE, FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF BONDS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the development of Tract 18936 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Bond #PB00618100039 and accept Maintenance Bond #PB00618100039-A for the associated public improvements; and 3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract Map 18936 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 12, 2015, for the residential subdivision of 17 single family lots on 8.32 acres of land, located on the south side of Carnesi Drive, east of Etiwanda Avenue, in the Very Low (VL) Zoning District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on March 7, 2018 in order to ensure construction of the required public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re -inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Carnesi, LLC., submitted Faithful Performance Bond #PB00618100039 in the amount of $ 115,300 to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With the completion of the improvements this bond is no longer required and the developer has submitted Maintenance Bond #PB00618100039-A in the amount of $11,500 to secure maintenance of the improvements through the one-year warranty period. Page 146 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item Enhances Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Description Vicinity Map Page 147 ATTACHMENT 1 TRACT 18936 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE PW 1p�Pm posan xv TOE= AV umm Rw :,o %Mmpw o g ao N Page 148 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Darren Chin, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO A MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT BY CRP/FPC FOOTHILL OWNER, LLC LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL BLVD AND HERMOSA AVENUE (CASE NO. DRC2016-00006) AS COMPLETE, FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF SECURITIES. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the development of DRC2016-00006 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Letter of Credit #18127524-00-000 and accept Maintenance Bond in cash deposit of $25,620 for the associated public improvements; and 3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: DRC2016-00006 was approved by the Planning Commission on October 17, 2016, for the construction of 182 -unit multi -family residential development on 4.78 acres on the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on May 3, 2017 in order to ensure construction of the required public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re -inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, CRP/FPC Foothill Owner, LLC., submitted Faithful Performance Letter of Credit #18127524-00-000 in the amount of $ 256,200 to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With the completion of the improvements this Letter of Credit is no longer required and the developer has submitted Maintenance cash deposit in the amount of $25,620 to secure maintenance of the improvements through the one-year warranty period. Page 149 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item Enhances Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 150 ATTACHMENT 1 DRC2016-00006 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE MRAM @hrg@a @bsa@n tar m cam m 44flm@2 WA&W mmdmo AIM M R=@R m erm sae @1"90 m9mAgo 02 MA AM ma" Aphm vasm mm sag 09 i fto Vann BW momma vaaa N5a 14 Page 151 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Darren Chin, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT PUBLIC STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON 4TH STREET AND 6TH STREET IMPROVEMENTS RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRACT 20073 (CASE NO. ROW2018-00135 AND ROW2018-00137 RESPECTIVELY) SUBMITTED BY SC RANCHO DEVELOPMENT CORP. AS COMPLETE, FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF BONDS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public street improvements and their design, required for the development of Tract 20073 related to Case Numbers ROW2018-00135 and ROW2018-00137 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; and cause City Clerk to record said documents. 2. Release Faithful Performance Bond and accept Maintenance Bond for the associated public improvements; and 3. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: Tentative Tract Map 20073 was approved by the Planning Commission on August 23, 2017, for the subdivision of approximately 84 acres into ten (10) parcels and one (1) lettered lot within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan, Planning Area 1, located north of 4th Street, south of 6th Street, west of Milliken Avenue, and east of Utica/Cleveland Avenues. Both improvement agreements and securities were approved by the City Council on August 1, 2018 (ROW2018-00135 and ROW2018-00137), in order to ensure construction of the required public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public street improvements on 4th Street and 6th Street required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. It should be noted that traffic signal are being constructed under a separate permit and will be presented to the City Council at a later date for consideration of acceptance. The subject street improvements will be re -inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Page 152 Prior to construction of the public street improvements the developer, SC Rancho Development Corp., submitted two Faithful Performance Bonds in the following amounts to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With the completion of the improvements this bond is no longer required and the developer has submitted two Maintenance Bonds in the following amounts to secure maintenance of the improvements through the one-year warranty period. The 4th Street improvements (ROW ROW2018-00135): Faithful Performance Bond $555,700 Maintenance Bond $55,570 The 6th Street improvements (ROW2018-00137): Faithful Performance Bond $1,200,000 Maintenance Bond $120,000 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item Enhances Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 153 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 154 TRACT 20073 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE Church Sf v a n fr 3 jdWry Oer{ m a Vlctona Gardens $� m d fb p m � Rancho Rancho Cucamonga Ct,carronya a Adult Sports o y e Complex Y 4 C AS Ar ti North Jersey Olvd Cucamonga Rochester nth it Ernpire- Laken Golf Course 5ll' St n GO, St 4 6 rb C p F C 7 a ¢ re h ,n ITh 3E • � + � � .®. � � r i . � . �ryt. � � + � .r+i.4kh.5� W } 4 � Onxario Mllls '�, `o q n G L 1tv t i Z I k m =_ z Ontario Mills Pkwy z m SFr$ $IVd z _ ro Slze�, C{f}rPr Dr Gpuast; Rd Rd !E Cauastl Rd E Guy -t Dr �i F Airpr,I llr E AirpO m � } N Page 154 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drain and Fleet Superintendent Paul Fisher, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT THE CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIR FY 2018/2019 PROJECT AS COMPLETE, FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF RETENTION AND BONDS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Accept the Citywide Concrete Repair FY 2018/2019 project, Contract No. 19-059, as complete. 2. Approve the final contract amount of $637,379.59. 3. Authorize the release of the Faithful Performance Bond and accept a Maintenance Bond. 4. Authorize the release of the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $582,757.00, six months after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. 5. Authorize the Public Works Services Director to file a Notice of Completion and release of the retention in the amount of $31,370.88, 35 days after acceptance. 6. Authorize the Public Works Services Director to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: The Citywide Concrete Repair FY 2018/2019 project scope of work consisted of curb/gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, and ADA ramp repairs in the Quadrants 1 and 4 (see attachment 2, location maps) and other concrete repairs in various parks and paseos located in Landscape Maintenance Districts (LMDs) 1, 2, and 4R. Bids were received and opened on April 9, 2019 and the project was awarded on May 15, 2019. Pertinent information of the project is as follows: Budgeted Amount: $696,720.00 Publish Dates for Local Paper: March 12, 2019 and March 19, 2019 Bid Opening: April 9, 2019 Contract Award Date: May 15, 2019 Low Bidder: DM Contracting, Inc. Contract Amount: $582,757.00 Contingency: $58,275.00 Final Contract Amount: $637,379.59 Difference in Contract Amount: $54,622.59 (9.4%) Page 155 ANALYSIS: The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Public Works Services Director. The net increase in the total cost of the project is due to the use of contingency funds to complete work at additional sites within the project area requiring repairs. At the end of the one-year maintenance period, if the improvements remain free from defects in materials and workmanship, the City Clerk is authorized to release the Maintenance Bond upon approval by the Public Works Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds were included in the Fiscal Year 2018/19 adopted budget for this project in account numbers 1001318-5650/1991001-0 (Street Maintenance), 1177303-5650/1991177-0 (Measure 1), 1131303-5300 (LMD 2), and 1134303-5300 (LMD 4R). COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's goal of Public Safety because the provision of well-maintained sidewalks, curbs, and other concrete areas enhances and reinforces the City's position as the premier community in the inland region. ATTACHMENTS: Description Notice of Completion Map of Locations Page 156 Attachment 1- Notice of Completion RECORDING REQUESTED BY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P. O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 Exempt from recording fees pursuant to Govt. Code Sec. 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The undersigned is an owner of an interest or estate in the hereinafter described real property, the nature of which interest or estate is: All public rights-of-way within the boundaries of Contract No. 19-059 2. The full name and address of the undersigned owner is: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, P. O. BOX 807, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730. 3, On February 19, 2020, there was completed in the hereinafter described real property the work of improvement set forth in the contract documents for: Citywide Concrete Repair FY 2018/2019 Project Remove and replace curb/gutter, drive approach, sidewalk, and ADA ramps plus related work 4. The name of the original contractor for the work of improvement as a whole was: DM Contracting, Inc. 5. The real property referred to herein is situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California, and is described as follows: All public rights-of-way within the boundaries of Contract No. 19-059 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, a Municipal Corporation, Owner I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the fore ing is ue and correct. DATE William Wittkopf Executed in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Public Works Servi es Director Page 157 2/10/2020 Citywide Concrete Repair FY 2018/2019 Attachment 2 - Map of Locations �� 011 r IL Aritonlo _ _ _ _ r _ _ _ _ l �r7/L- Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS I City of Rancho Cucamonga, Esri, HERE, Garmin, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA https://regis.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/print.html Page 158 1/1 � Project reaa; ! I Ouadrant Quadrant 2 i ••w I m w C _n _ 3 Alta Lo a Gr Li1+1D•• rk Etiwaptla m %'V 16th 5t E 15th St n �F' # BaSeIIne Ave a .'• LMD 4R �~� 1 U ge ts ,' ���ip111 a Ra c ho r Upland P - Cucamonga 1S Fontana , Quadrant 4 Quadrant 3 Kalser w 8th St .. _ Merrill Ave K �F�St W 4th St }, . _ .. .. _ .. . .. . . , .. Say, Bernardino AvedQ o�4�C• m A Valley Blvd Onta rioGuasd E Halt Blvd pr W Slnaer Awe �r,?art Ontario Int'I Airport Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS I City of Rancho Cucamonga, Esri, HERE, Garmin, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA https://regis.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/print.html Page 158 1/1 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Anne McIntosh, Planning Director Michael Frasure, Building and Safety Services Manager Donny Mahoney, Chief of Police Brian Sandona, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO CONSIDER FEE ADJUSTMENTS FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS AND CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the following actions: 1. That the City Council conduct the public hearing; 2. That the City Council adopt the attached resolutions to revise or adopt user fees for the Building and Safety, Police, and Planning Departments; 3. That the City Council adopt the attached resolution amending Resolution No. 18-114 to revise citywide Transportation Development Impact Fees. BACKGROUND: The City and Fire District can impose fees under the authority granted by California Government Code Section 66000 et. seq, including the requirement to hold at least one public hearing as part of a regularly scheduled meeting to allow for public comment on its proposed fees. Fees can be imposed in order to recover costs associated with the provision of specific services benefiting the user, thereby reducing the use of General Fund monies for such purposes. As a matter of routine, the city departments revisit user and development impact fees at least once per year to ensure that small adjustments can be made over time to keep up with operational and construction costs. In accordance with that approach, departments have once again reviewed their user and development impact fees to determine what adjustments should be made at this time. This report covers requests for revisions to fees for the following work groups: Police, Building and Safety, Engineering Services, and Planning. The corresponding cost analysis worksheets were placed on file in the City Clerk's office on February 5, 2020. ANALYSIS: User Fee Updates The following user fee adjustments are detailed in the proposed City resolutions: Page 159 BUILDING AND SAFETY SERVICES Building and Safety Services fees were approved by Resolution 18-040 on June 6, 2018. During the creation of the fee tables for the update on November 6, 2019, it was determined that there was a technical error in select fees in the adopted fee table which resulted in the fees being incorrectly calculated. All of the affected fees have been identified and corrected in the proposed resolution. PLANNING SERVICES Establishment of the Etiwanda Heights Specific Plan Cost Recovery Fee The Planning Department is recommending adoption of an Etiwanda Heights Specific Plan cost recovery fee. Following up on the October 2019 adoption of the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood & Conservation Plan (EHNCP), establishment of this fee will provide for recovery of the City's consulting and legal costs related to that 5 -year planning effort. Fees will be collected in the future as the property is developed, and are based on the anticipated development pattern. The new fee would be $1,101 per residential unit in the Neighborhood Area, $1,914 per residential unit in the Rural Conservation Area, and $0.28 per square foot of commercial development. Fees would be adjusted annually in accordance with other Planning Services fees. Modifications to other Planning Fees In 2019, Council adopted two amendments to the development code. Ordinance No. 961 updated standards for temporary uses, including standards for non-commercial (residential) haunted houses for community benefit. At the time of adoption of the ordinance, Council directed staff to waive the temporary use permit fee for these uses. This waiver will now be included in our fee table. Ordinance No. 964 modified the permitting process for entertainment permits. Future entertainment permit applications may now be reviewed administratively, unless it is deemed necessary by the Planning Director to elevate the application to the Planning Commission for review. Staff recommends implementing a two-tier fee for entertainment permits, adding a reduced fee for administrative review of $4,461. The current fee for entertainment permits requiring Planning Commission review is $8,893. Staff is also proposing an associated change to the Entertainment Permit Modification process. Entertainment Permit Modifications are proposed to include a two-tier fee structure, adding a reduced fee for administrative review to $2,231. The current fee for Entertainment Permit Modifications requiring Planning Commission review is $4,443. POLICE DEPARTMENT The Police Department is recommending an update to tow services fees charged to the City's tow carriers under their tow services agreements. Recently, due to changes in the law, the number of vehicles towed by the Police Department has declined, resulting in fewer tows per tow carrier. That lower volume of tows results in a decline in gross revenues to the tow carriers, while their tow services fees paid to the City remain fixed. The proposed amendment would allow the City Manager to defer already approved increases to the tow services fees should the volume of tows continue to remain significantly below historic levels. ENGINEERING SERVICES Transportation Development Impact Fee Update On April 18, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development impact fees. Most recently, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 18-114 updating city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. The current Transportation Development Impact Fees (DIF) have been reviewed and analyzed by City staff Page 160 and found insufficient to meet future transportation needs due to increases in construction costs since the last fee update in November 2018. It is necessary for the City to evaluate the costs of the transportation development impact fee program regularly to ensure that the impact fees charged keep pace with the increasing costs of construction for these vital projects that help to mitigate the citywide traffic impact of new development. After evaluation and calculation, staff initially recommended an effective increase of 15.3% to these fees. Following further evaluation of the estimated costs for the program's projects, staff was able to adjust and lower the requested increase to 11.8%. Further, after discussions with the Building Industry Association (BIA) and in an effort to balance costs with the need to encourage construction of housing to meet State regulatory requirements, staff has included a provision in the attached resolution that would delay the implementation of this increase until January 1, 2022 for residential subdivisions whose Final Map or Parcel Map have been recorded as of the adoption date of the attached resolution. For all other developments, the fee increase would be effective 60 days from the date of adoption. After consultation with the BIA, they have provided their support for the proposed methodology and had no further comments on the proposed fees. A copy of their email is attached. EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEES Building and Safety, Engineering and Planning fees will be effective 60 days from the adoption of the resolution, consistent with state law except as described above for the transportation development impact fees. The amendment to the Police Department's fees would be effective upon adoption of the attached resolution. PUBLIC NOTICE: Pursuant to Government Code Section 65090, this item was advertised twice in the ten (10) days in advance with at least five (5) days between said advertisements as a public hearing (1/8 page ad) in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper. FISCAL IMPACT: By consistently examining user fees annually, these updates provide additional revenue to offset the City's costs. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Police Tow Fee Resolution Attachment 2 - EHSP Cost Recovery Fee Resolution Attachment 3 - Building and Safety and Planning Fee Update Resolution Attachment 4 - Engineering Transportation Fee Resolution Attachment 5 - BIA Correspondence Page 161 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A FEE SCHEDULE APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN POLICE DEPARTMENT FEES RELATING TO TOWING SERVICES, AND REPEALING RESOLUTION 17-037. A. Recitals. 1. The California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do no exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. 2. Data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service, for which the fees and charges set forth herein apply, was made available to the public at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 3. On February 19, 2020, City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Resolution. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby specifically finds that the fees and charges set forth do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge be levied. SECTION 3: The City hereby adopts the following fees for services performed by the Police Department: Page 162 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX FEES FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS AND SERVICES February 19, 2020 Page 2 Title Description Cost Tow Service The Tow Service Application fee is the fee potential $2,500 Application fee vendors will pay to be considered for inclusion in the Request for Proposal process in the Police Department's tow service rotation. The fee will cover the costs associated with the application process, evaluating vendors and vendor inspections. Monthly Tow The Tow Service monthly fee is $5,000 per month $5,000/ Service fee through June 30, 2019; $6,000 per month beginning $6,000/ July 1, 2019; $7,000 per month beginning July 1, $7000/ 2020; and $8,000 per month beginning July 1, 2021. $8,000 The tow service fee is paid the amount each tow carrier will pay the city to provide tow services. Monthly Tow The Tow Service Monthly fee MAY be deferred at N/A Service Fee the discretion of the City Manager for a period of Deferral time to be determined by the City Manager's Office. SECTION 4: Resolution 17-037 is hereby repealed. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution. Page 163 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX FEES FOR VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS AND SERVICES February 19, 2020 Page 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 2020. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 19th day of February, 2020. Executed this 19th day of February, 2020 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Clerk Page 164 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A COST RECOVERY FEE RELATED TO THE ETIWANDA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD AND CONSERVATION PLAN A. Recitals. WHEREAS, the California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do no exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies; and WHEREAS, on October 2, 2019, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood & Conservation Plan (EHNCP), a new specific plan governing future development in an area including 305 acres within City boundaries, and an additional 4,393 acres in the City's Sphere of Influence that is in the process of annexation into the City; and WHEREAS, Government Code Section 65456(a) provides that the legislative body, after adopting a specific plan, may impose a specific plan fee upon persons seeking governmental approvals which are required to be consistent with the specific plan; and WHEREAS, Section 1.16.010 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides that the City Council may adopt a resolution to establish a specific plan fee. Now therefore, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga finds and resolves as follows: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby specifically finds that the fees and charges set forth do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge be levied. SECTION 3: The City hereby amends Resolution 18-040, effective 60 days after the adoption of this resolution, and adopts the following fees applicable to development within the EHNCP boundaries to recover some of the costs associated with the preparation and adoption of the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan: Fee per residential unit in the Neighborhood Area: $1,101 per unit Fee per residential unit in the Rural Conservation Area: $1,914 per unit Fee for commercial and other non-residential development: $.28 per square foot These fees will be collected prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. SECTION 4. The fees established in Section 3 above will be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2020, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12 month period ending on December 31s' of the immediately preceding year, as released by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Page 165 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX ETIWANDA HEIGHTS SPECIFIC PLAN COST RECOVERY FEE February 19, 2020 Page 2 Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 5: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of the Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 2020. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 201h day of February 2019. Executed this 19th day of February, 2020 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Clerk Page 166 ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FEES FOR SERVICES PERFORMED BY BUILDING AND SAFETY AND PLANNING A. Recitals. 1. The California Government Code allows the City to establish fees and charges for municipal services, provided such fees and charges do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost to the City in providing the service to which the fee or charge applies. 2. Data indicating the estimated or actual cost to provide each service, for which the fees and charges set forth herein apply, was made available to the public at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the public hearing. 3. On February 19, 2020 the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the amendment. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby specifically finds that the fees and charges set forth do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee or charge be levied. SECTION 3. The City hereby amends Resolution 18-040, and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Building and Safety Services Department, including the current 7% Technology Fee and 10% General Plan Maintenance Fee, effective 60 days from the adoption of this resolution, consistent with State Law: Fee Name/Title Unit/Type Fee Solar/ Photovoltaic: Residential each kw over 15 $18 Solar/ Photovoltaic: Commercial 0-250 kw $596 Solar/ Photovoltaic: Commercial each kw over 250 $6 Trash enclosure up to 100 linear ft. up to 100 linear ft $419 Electrical for Alumawood patio cover/enclosure Up to 10 lights, outlets, switches $78 Swimming pool Remodel including plaster, equip, barrier, tile $538 Page 167 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX FEE UPDATE FOR BUILDING AND PLANNING February 19, 2020 Page 2 Swimming pool Replaster including plaster drainage $419 HVAC System each additional system $60 Split System each additional system $60 Residential Composition Roof up to 2,000 sq. ft $313 Residential Composition Roof each additional 1000 sq. ft $157 Residential Tile Roof up to 2,000 sq. ft $391 Residential Tile Roof each additional 1000 sq. ft $234 Tile Lift and Re-lay Roof up to 2000 sq. ft $548 Tile Lift and Re-lay Roof each additional 1000 sq. ft $234 Fire Alarm & Sprinkler Monitoring Production 0-15 devices $432 Fire Alarm & Sprinkler Monitoring Production 16-50 devices $588 Fire Alarm & Sprinkler Monitoring Production 51-100 devices $745 Fire Alarm & Sprinkler Monitoring Production 101-500 devices $1,138 Fire Alarm & Sprinkler Monitoring Production each additional 25 devices $94 Plan Duplication Fee $32.00 plus flash drive $42 SECTION 4. The City hereby amends Resolution 18-040, and adopts the following fees for services performed by the Planning Department, including the current 7% Technology Fee and 10% General Plan Maintenance Fee, effective 60 days from the adoption of this resolution, consistent with State Law: No. Fee Description Type e 52 Temporary Use Permit Model Home Sales Office / Temporary Offices FLAT 1 $3,219 Non -Profit FLAT 1 $217 Residential (non-commercial) Haunted Houses No Charge All Others FLAT 1 $615 15 Entertainment Permit Fee Administrative Review FLAT $4,461 PC Approval FLAT 1 $8,893 16 Entertainment Permit - Modification Fee Administrative Review FLAT $2,231 PC Approval FLAT 1 $4,443 1 This fee is listed for illustrative purposes only. These fees remain at their current rate, based on the comprehensive fee study adopted by the City Council in 2018 (Resolution 18-040) and adjusted annually based on BLS — employment cost index. SECTION 5: The fees set forth in Sections 3 & 4 shall be adjusted annually, commencing on July 1, 2020, and each year thereafter, without further action of the City Council, based on the Employee Cost Index for State and Local Government Employees, Total Compensation, during the 12 -month period ending on December 31st of the immediately preceding year, as released Page 168 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX FEE UPDATE FOR BUILDING AND PLANNING February 19, 2020 Page 3 by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics and rounded to the nearest whole dollar. If this index is discontinued, a replacement index, as determined by the City Council, shall be utilized. SECTION 6: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 2020. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 20th day of February 2019. Executed this 19th day of February, 2020 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. Janice C. Reynolds, Clerk Page 169 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX FEE UPDATE FOR BUILDING AND PLANNING February 19, 2020 Page 4 Page 170 ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 18-114, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS: 1. On April 18, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees. 2. On November 21, 2018, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 18-114, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. 3. The Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued need for described capital improvements and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate. 4. The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) requires that project costs and fees, including Transportation Development Fees (DIF), be updated biennially. 5. The fee increase is based on recent construction costs received by the City and the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Price Index for Construction Items, from 2nd Quarter 2017 to 4th Quarter 2019 of 12.5% resulting in an overall effective increase of 11.8%. All summaries and calculations are hereby incorporated. 6. On February 19, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing. 7. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds as follows: a. The purpose of the fee revision is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and Page 171 b. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; and c. The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and d. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and e. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit "B", and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and f. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. 3. DEFINITIONS: "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development project" includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. 2. "Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. 3. "Equivalent dwelling unit" or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing is equal to one EDU. 4. PAYMENT OF FEE: The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid per Chapter 3.28 City -Wide System Fee for Transportation Development subsection 3.28.020 Fees established of the RCMC. The City Engineer, or their designee, shall calculate and determine the amount of the fee based upon the rate then in effect at the time of payment. 5. FEE SCHEDULE: The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $12,131 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C". 6. EDU/LAND USE EQUIVALENT SCHEDULE: The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: Page 172 Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU 7. USE OF FEE: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". 8. ADMINISTRATION FEE: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 9. FEE REVIEW: The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts for the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 10. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees as herein amended shall not be imposed by the City until 60 days from the date of the public hearing, and not until January 1, 2022 for residential subdivisions for which a Final Map or Parcel Map has been recorded as of the date of adoption of this resolution. 11. JUDICIAL CHALLENGE: Any judicial action proceeding to appeal, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. Page 173 12. CERTIFICATION: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 19th day of February, 2020 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the _ of February 2020. Executed this 19th day of February 2020, at Rancho Cucamonga, California Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Page 174 Exhibit "A" Transportation Fee Program Projects & Project Costs Freeway Interchanges Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings Project Estimate F1 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $946,169 F2 Foothill Boulevard at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $1,467,771 F3 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $21,903,000 F4 Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange $54,593,100 F5 Grove Avenue / 4th Street at 1-10 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $5,977,347 Total: $84,887,386 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings Bridges Project Estimate R1 Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $14,398,764 R2 6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $1,168,903 R3 6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $1,168,903 R4 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $1,891,333 Total: $18,627,904 Bridges Page 175 Project Estimate B1 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $2,723,014 B2 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $1,291,107 B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch - Widen Existing Bridge $1,267,198 B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,442,533 B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $8,239,440 B6 Whitram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $1,588,646 B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $1,635,136 B8 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $2,753,564 Total: $20,940,638 Page 175 Streets Page 176 Project Estimate S1 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $884,647 S2 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,789,219 S3 Arrow Route - 500' E/O 1-15 Freeway to 1,300' E/O 1-15 Freeway - Widen South Side $1,485,039 S4 Banyan Street - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen North Side $1,311,031 S5 Banyan Street - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New Alignment $10,811,028 S6 Base Line Road - Etiwanda Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen North Side 2 to 3 Lanes $1,305,718 S7 Cherry Avenue - Wilson Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen West Side $1,582,004 S8 Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,694,910 S9 East Avenue - 1-15 to Victoria Street - Various Bottlenecks $1,083,892 S10 East Avenue - Fire Station to Wilson - New $1,720,148 S11 East Avenue - Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way - New $581,795 S12 Etiwanda Avenue - 6th Street to Arrow Route - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $5,479,235 S13 Etiwanda Avenue - Miller Avenue to 850' N/O Miller Avenue - Widen East Side $374,580 S14 Etiwanda Avenue - Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue - Curb and Gutter East Side Only $1,233,990 S15 Etiwanda Avenue - Existing Northern Terminus to North Rim Way - New $697,357 S16 Foothill Boulevard - Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $1,599,272 S17 Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue to 700' E/O Hellman Avenue - Widen North Side Only $2,563,618 S18 Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue - Widen Intersection $9,623,528 S19 Foothill Boulevard - Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue - Widen 4 to 6 Lanes $2,602,138 S20 Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Tapia Via - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $1,426,593 S21 Grove Avenue - San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East Side Only $878,006 S22 Haven Avenue - Base Line Road to 1-210 Freeway - Widen West Side Only $16,388,556 S23 Lower Crest Road - Day Creek Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - New $2,133,249 S24 Miller Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $3,222,454 S25 Milliken Avenue - 5th Street to 700'S/0 5th Street - Widen West Side Only $405,131 Page 176 Trak Signals Project Estimate S26 Victoria Street - East Property Line of Etiwanda High School to 1-15 Freeway - Improve Both Shoulders $390,520 S27 Vintage Drive - Etiwanda Avenue to 1,300' W/O Etiwanda Avenue - New $1,142,337 S28 Wilson Avenue - Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard - New $9,064,314 S29 Wilson Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Backbone Only $750,489 S30 Wilson Avenue - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $7,969,796 S31 Youngs Canyon - Cherry Avenue to Wardman Bullock - New $12,486,013 T7 Total: $104,680,609 Trak Signals Page 177 Project Estimate T1 4th Street at Richmond Place $464,905 T2 4th Street at Utica Avenue $464,905 T3 6th Street at Buffalo Avenue $464,905 T4 6th Street at Cleveland Avenue $464,905 T5 6th Street at Etiwanda Avenue $464,905 T6 6th Street at Hellman Avenue $464,905 T7 6th Street at Pittsburgh Avenue $464,905 T8 6th Street at Rochester Avenue $464,905 T9 6th Street at Santa Anita Avenue $464,905 T10 6th Street at Utica Avenue $464,905 T11 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street $464,905 T12 Archibald Avenue at San Bernardino Road $464,905 T13 Archibald Avenue at Victoria Street $464,905 T14 Archibald Avenue at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T15 Arrow Route at Center Avenue $464,905 T16 Banyan Street at Rochester Avenue $464,905 T17 Banyan Street at Wardman Bullock Road $464,905 T18 Base Line Road at San Carmela Court $464,905 T19 Base Line Road at Shelby Place $464,905 T20 Carnelian Street at Banyan Street $464,905 T21 Carnelian Street at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T22 Cherry Avenue at Youngs Canyon Road $464,905 Page 177 Page 178 Project Estimate T23 Church Street at Elm Avenue (West) $464,905 T24 Church Street at Mayten Avenue $464,905 T25 Church Street at Ramona Avenue $464,905 T26 Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway $464,905 T27 Civic Center Drive at Red Oak Street $464,905 T28 Ridgeline Place at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T29 Day Creek Boulevard at Madrigal Place $464,905 T30 Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T31 East Avenue at Miller Avenue $464,905 T32 East Avenue at Highland Avenue $464,905 T33 Etiwanda Avenue at Garcia Drive $464,905 T34 Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue $464,905 T35 Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Court $464,905 T36 Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue $464,905 T37 Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue $464,905 T38 Haven Avenue at Trademark Street $464,905 T39 Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue $464,905 T40 Haven Avenue at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T41 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street $464,905 T42 Hermosa Avenue at Church Street $464,905 T43 Milliken Avenue at 5th Street $464,905 T44 Milliken Avenue at Wilson Avenue $464,905 T45 Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard $464,905 T46 Spruce Avenue at Elm Avenue $464,905 T47 Spruce Avenue at Mountain View Drive $464,905 T48 Spruce Avenue at Red Oak Street $464,905 T49 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue $464,905 T50 Terra Vista Parkway at Town Center Drive $464,905 T51 Town Center Drive at Elm Avenue $464,905 T52 Wilson Avenue at East Avenue $464,905 T53 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue $464,905 T54 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue (West) $464,905 T55 Wilson Avenue at San Sevaine Road $464,905 T56 Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road $464,905 Page 178 Signal Interconnect System Project Estimate T57 Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue $464,905 T58 4th Street at Golden Lock Road - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T59 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T60 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $66,415 T61 Arrow Route at Red Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T62 Arrow Route at White Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T63 Banyan Street at East Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T64 Base Line Road at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T65 Base Line Road at Spruce Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T66 Base Line Road at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T67 Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T68 Day Creek Boulevard at Sugar Gum Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T69 Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T70 Milliken Avenue at Millenium Court - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T71 Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T72 Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T73 Milliken Avenue at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 T74 Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $33,207 Total: $27,097,305 Signal Interconnect System Page 179 Project Estimate S11 Signal Interconnect System $10,227,904 Total: $10,227,904 Page 179 Program Totals Category Estimate Freeway Interchanges $84,887,386 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings $18,627,904 Bridges $20,940,638 Streets $104,680,609 Traffic Signals $27,097,305 Signal Interconnect System $10,227,904 Total: $266,461,747 DIF Program Cost Item Estimate Program Total $266,461,747 Less Fund Balance as of 2005 -$20,000,000 Sub -Total $246,461,747 Administration Fee (15%) $36,969,262 Total: $283,431,010 Page 180 EXHIBIT "B" TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES Land Use Type Fee Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $12,131 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/ Accessory Dwelling Unit $7,279 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit $7,279 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom $2,426 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed $2,426 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $18,197 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet $14,557 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $7,279 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet $6,066 Hotel / Motel - Per Room $9,705 Day Care - Per Student $3,033 Self -Storage - Per Unit $243 Service Station - Per Pump $60,655 Page 181 EXHIBIT "C" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM CALCULATIONS Vacant Land as of February 2005 Vacant Residential Property = 950 acres Single Family Dwelling Units (SFDU) = 5,363 units Multi -Family Dwelling Units (MFDU) = 5,248 units Vacant Industrial Property = 719 acres = 31,319,640 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5 then the future square footage of industrial development is 31,319,640 square feet x 0.5 = 15,659,820 square feet. Vacant Commercial Property = 334 acres = 14,549,040 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future square footage of commercial development is 14,549,040 square feet x 0.25 = 3,637,260 square feet. Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) per Land Use Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to be tabulated for each type of land use, the "Equivalent Dwelling Units" or EDU for each type of land use must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type's EDU is based on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Per City Resolution No. 91-092, the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/ Accessory Dwelling Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU Page 182 Total Future Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) Land Use Vacant Land as of February 2005 EDU by Future Land Equivalent Use Dwelling Units Single -Family Dwelling Unit 5,363 Units 1.00 5,363 Multi -Family Dwelling Unit 5,248 Units 0.60 3,149 Industrial Park(per 1,000 SF 15,659,820 SF 0.60 9,396 Commercial(per 1,000 SF 3,637,260 SF 1.50 5,455 Total Future EDU 0.2 EDU 23,363 Calculate Cost per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) Total Cost of Projects $283,431,010 Total Future EDU (as of February 2005) 23,363 Cost per EDU $12,131 Calculate Transportation Development Fees by Land Use Item EDU by Land Use Fees Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU $12,131 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit/ Accessory Dwelling Unit 0.6 EDU $7,279 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU $7,279 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU $2,426 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU $2,426 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU $18,197 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU $14,557 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU $7,279 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU $6,066 Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU $9,705 Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU $3,033 Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU $243 Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU $60,655 Page 183 Attachment 5 From: Gordon Nichols <Gordon@biabuild.com> Date: February 13, 2020 at 1:44:28 PM PST To: "Welday, Jason" <Jason.Welday@cityofrc.us>, Carlos Rodriguez <carlos@biabuild.com> Cc: Roman Nava <roman@biabuild.com>, Phil Burum <pbburum@drhorton.com>, Josh Gause <JGause @vandaele.com>, "Ben.Cendejas@lewismc.com" <Ben.Cendejas@lewismc.com>, "Frasure, Michael" <Michael.Frasure@cityofrc.us>, "Victorino, Valerie" <Valerie.Victorino@cityofrc.us>, "Nakamura, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Nakamura @cityofrc.us>, "Sandona, Brian" <Brian.Sandona@cityofrc.us> Subject: RE: BIA Questions ANING: The sender of this email could not be validated and may not match the d. person in the "From" Hi Jason, Thank you again for taking the time to meet with BIA to discuss the Transportation Fee. We've received feedback from our members and they are supportive of the City's proposed method of implementation, exempting final maps with the 2022 sunset provision. We'd like to also express our gratitude for revising the Cal Trans cost index from 15.3% to 11.8%. Can you please send us the revised staff report once it is ready? We plan to attend the City Council meeting next Wednesday. We look forward to work with you further to meet Rancho Cucamonga's housing needs. Regards, Building Industry Association of Southern California — Baldy View Chapter "The Voice of the Home Building Industry" AN AFFILIATE OF NAHB WASHINGTON D.C. & CB.I.A. SACRAMENTO • 1L AVk ��qq • Yoti h FMOERSNIP U in 'c MATTERS Page 184 Public Hearing of The City of Rancho Cucamonga to Consider Fee Adjustments for Various City Departments and Citywide Transportation Development Impact Fees •The City can impose fees under the authority granted by Government Code Section 66000 in order to recover costs associated with specific services. • Routinely, City departments revisit user and development impact fees and adjust them over time to keep up with operational and construction costs. •The user fees and development impact fees in need of adjustment are as follows: • Planning Department: • Establishment of the Etiwanda Heights Specific Plan Cost Recovery Fee • Various User Fees • Building and Safety Department: • Various User Fees • Police Department: • Tow Services Fees • Engineering Department: • Transportation Development Impact Fees • Public Notice • This item was advertised pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 • Staff has received input from and met with the Building Industry Association of Sothern California •Staff Recommendations: • Adopt resolutions to revise or adopt user fees for the Building and Safety, Police, and Planning Departments • Adopt the a resolution amending Resolution No. 18- 114 to revise citywide Transportation Development Impact Fees Staff is available or any questions. RECEIVED DURING PUBLIC COMMENT 2.19.2020 ITEM J1. Police Department franchise fee Riverside Sheriff: No fee on vehicles towed for 22651 -G/22651 -C and Owner request. Fees are collected at station when release form is issued or if released at tow yard without the release, fee needs to be collected then sent to department. No fee is paid to department if vehicle was lien sold or owner signs vehicle over to tow yard. Colton PD: 10% of all towing and storage fees collected by tow company. Fontana PD: $170 franchise fee on all tows taken to the tow yard except 22651-C and evidence tows. Allowed to pass to violator. Ontario PD: $131 franchise fee collected on all 180's except owner request, 22651-C, vehicles sold over $500, and if franchise fee was exempted by the Police department. Allowed to pass to violator. Riverside PD: $65 franchise fee collected on all 180's except owner request tows and evidence tows. Included in tow fee Rialto PD: $95 Franchise fee collected on all 180's except owner request tows, 22651 -C/22651 - G, and evidence tows. Franchise fee collected on all vehicles sold over $300. Allowed to pass to violator. PEPE'S INC. - PEPES TOWING 2019 SCHEDULE OF TOWS IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PEPES PROFIT (LOSS) PER MONTH BASED ON THE NUMBER OF VEHICLES TOWED THIS SCHEDULE WAS PREPARED BY JOHN S. BALISY & COMPANY, AN ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION # OF CARS REVENUE OF COSTS OF MONTHLY PEPES MONTH OF SERVICE TOWED CARS TOWED CARS TOW CITY FEES PROFIT (LOSS) January 31, 2019 103 $ 61,775 43,130 5,000 $ 13,645 February 28, 2019 85 45,088 35,593 51000 $ 4,495 March 31, 2019 74 40,658 30,987 51000 $ 4,671 April 30, 2019 83 48,324 34,756 51000 $ 8,568 May 31, 2019 65 35,905 27,218 5,000 $ 3,687 June 30, 2019 66 36,104 27,637 5,000 $ 3,467 July 31, 2019 63 34,488 26,381 61000 $ 2,107 August 31, 2019 67 36,245 28,056 61000 $ 2,189 September 30, 2019 58 30,811 24,287 6,000 $ 524 October 31, 2019 74 41,036 30,987 6,000 $ 4,049 November 30, 2019 69 38,108 28,893 61000 $ 3,215 December 31, 2019 43 22,592 18,006 61000 $ (1,414) 66,000 49,203 THIS SCHEDULE WAS PREPARED BY JOHN S. BALISY & COMPANY, AN ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS, APPLICANT. THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 4,118 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 771 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE AND A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS UP TO 5 -FEET AND 2 - INCHES HIGH ON A 15,430 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 8035 CAMINO PREDERA - APN: 0207-631-03. A MINOR EXCEPTION WAS ALSO REQUESTED TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT LIMIT FOR RETAINING WALLS IN THE ZONE. THIS ITEM WAS DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND THE CITY'S CEQA GUIDELINES PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(4) AS A PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN REJECTED OR DISAPPROVED. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny appeal DRC2019-00975 and uphold the decision by the Planning Commission to deny Hillside Development Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 through the adoption of the attached resolutions of denial. BACKGROUND: Project Description: The applicant proposed to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence that includes a 771 square foot attached three -car garage along with 374 square feet of porches and decks. The 15,430 square foot project site (Lot 13 of Tract 10035) is located on the south side of Camino Predera, one lot to the east of the existing residence at 8045 Camino Predera, in the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District. Review Process Timeline: The Hillside Design Review application for the project was submitted to the City on March 22, 2017. City Staff processed the application and during several cycles of review requested that the applicant provide additional information about the project and revise the design of the house to ensure compliance with the General Plan and Development Code. The City deemed the application "Complete" for processing purposes in September 2019. Page 185 The Planning Commission reviewed Hillside Development Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting. At that meeting, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to have staff draft a resolution of denial for the subject entitlements for their action at the following Planning Commission meeting. The resolutions of denial for Hillside Development Review DRC2018-00473 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 were placed on December 11, 2019, Planning Commission Consent Calendar, which was approved without comment. The applicant appealed the Planning Commission decision on December 19, 2019, within the required 10 -day appeal period. ANALYSIS: Resident Concerns: The residents along Camino Predera raised concerns related to the project at the June 10, 2019, Neighborhood Meeting; at the October 15, 2019, Design Review Committee meeting; and at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting. The issues raised by the residents were related to building height, building setbacks and the overall size of the structure, each of which they believed was out of character to the existing neighborhood and the intent of the Hillside Design regulations. While the proposed single-family residence complies with the minimum development requirements of the Development Code, staff did not support the project based on building size/massing, building width/setbacks, and General Plan Compatibility. A detailed description and analysis of the project have been provided in the Staff Report that was presented to the Planning Commission on November 13, 2019 included with this staff report as Attachment 1. New Standards: It should be noted that the Planning Department has been working with the residents of the Red Hill neighborhood to develop development standards to address the long-standing issues related to the development of the 14 remaining vacant lots along Camino Predera. Staff hosted two separate meetings with the Red Hill residents on August 8, 2019, and on September 9, 2019. Based on comments received at these two meetings, it was determined that the residents were only interested in City developing new development standards for the vacant lots along Camino Predera. These updated standards were presented to the Planning Commission on January 22, 2020, as Municipal Code Amendment DRC2020-00004. At that meeting, both the existing residents and the vacant lot owners raised concerns about the proposed standards. The Planning Commission deliberated and asked staff to schedule an additional meeting with the residents along Camino Predera to determine whether a compromise could be reached. That meeting was held in the Tri -Community room of City Hall on January 30, 2020, with approximately 17 residents in attendance. This meeting concluded with neither the existing residents nor the vacant lot owners finding common ground on the major issue of building height or building setbacks. The residents did ask for more time to resolve the outstanding issues. It is important to note that the Camino Predera residents are aware that their neighbors may continue to submit applications for new homes like this one, and that any delay in adopting new regulations will result in these projects being reviewed under current standards. All of the neighbors were willing to go through the projects one by one in exchange for having more discussion about the standards. Therefore, staff determined that the Planning Commission public hearing for the Municipal Code Amendment with the new standards should be continued to an unspecified date to provide the residents with more time to work the unresolved issues. Mr. Bardos requested that his appeal move ahead to City Council tonight to avoid further delay. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed by an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City Page 186 services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages infill development that facilitates sustainable and attractive development that complements the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single-family residence is significantly larger than those in the surrounding neighborhood, and the proposed residence is being built to the minimum side yard setbacks, increase the appearance of overbuilding the lot. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - 11/13/19 PC Staff Report Attachment 2 - 12/11/19 PC Staff Report Attachment 3 -CC HDR Reso Attachment 4 - CC ME Reso Page 187 STAFF REPORT DATE: November 13, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 771 square foot garage and a request to construct retaining walls up to 5 -feet and 2 -inches high on a 15,430 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial for Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and a resolution of denial without prejudice for Minor Exception DRC2018. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The 15,430 square foot vacant project site is located on the south side of Camino Predera, within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District. The property dimensions are approximately 80 feet along the north and south property lines, 195 feet along the east property line and 189 feet along the west property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 1,301 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line and an elevation of approximately 1,260 feet as measured along the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 41 feet. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 188 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District North Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District South Pacific Electric Trail Public Mixed -Use (MU) District East Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District Page 188 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. November 13, 2019 Page 2 West Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District ANALYSIS: A. Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence along with an attached three -car 771 square foot garage and 374 square feet of porches and decks on the 15,430 square foot project site. The proposed grading includes up to 8 feet of cut, which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission (The maximum cut of fill that can be permitted adminstratively by the Planning Director is 5 feet). The proposed residence has a craftsman design theme, which includes a concrete tile roof, horizontal wood siding, shake siding and a river rock wainscot. The proposed 4,118 square foot residence consists of a 2,352 square foot upper level, which includes the main living area and master bedroom, and a 1,766 square lower level, which includes 3 bedrooms and a bonus room. The upper and lower levels each include decks along the south elevations. The 771 square foot three -car garage is located on the upper level of the residence, with the garage doors facing Camino Predera. The driveway has a maximum grade of 15 percent. Hillside Development Standard 17.122.020.C.1.d. states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are permitted when they are aligned with the natural contours of the lot and are necessary to achieve site design goals. The project complies with the minimum current development requirements of the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District except that the project includes retaining walls over 4 feet in height which necessitates the approval of a Minor Exception for wall height. The following table provide an overview of project compliance with the Development Code (it should be noted that the City is in the process of developing new development criteria for Camino Predera): Development Criteria Requirement Proposed Compliant? Front Yard Setback 37 feet 60 feet Yes Side Yard Setbacks 5 and 10 feet 5 and 10 feet Yes Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 85 feet Yes Lot Coverage 40 percent 32 percent Yes Building Height Overall 30 feet 30 feet Yes Building Height at Curb Face 10.5 feet N/A Retaining Wall Height 4 feet max 5 feet No** Cut/Fill 5 feet 8* Feet *Grading in Excess of 5 feet Requires Planning Commission Approval **Applicant has submitted Minor Exception (DRC2018-00473) to permit the additional wall height Page 189 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 3 An existing combination wall and wrought iron fence is located along the west property line that was constructed with the development of the single-family residence to the west. The applicant proposes an up to 4 -foot retaining wall topped by a 5 -foot wrought -iron fence along the east property line. A 6 -foot -high wrought fence is proposed along the south elevation. The proposed perimeter walls are in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Section 17.122.020.E., which encourages the use of open -view fencing and having walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. The proposed grading design includes 784 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 1,296 feet and the lower garage pad at an elevation of 1,286, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D. 1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.D.1.C. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30 -foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north -south and two east -west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30 -foot height requirement. The height of the residence ranges from approximately 10 -feet and 6 -inches, along the east side of the residence, to 6 - feet and 11 -inches, along the west side of the residence, as measured above curb face on Camino Predera. The proposed landscaping is designed to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., including the installation of a permanent irrigation system landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is not within the High Fire Hazard Zone or within a wildland-urban interface area. The proposed landscaping also complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area. The rear yard includes slope planting to prevent erosion. Neighborhood Concerns and Staff Analysis: Over the years, residents along Camino Predera have raised concerns related to the development of remaining undeveloped lots of Tract 10035. The overriding concern has been that the proposed residences are out of character with the existing neighborhood based on building size/massing, building height and building width (side setbacks). These same issues were raised by the residents related to the proposed project at the June 10, 2019, Neighborhood Meeting and again at the October 15, 2019, Design Review Committee meeting. As a result of these persistent neighborhood concerns, and in response to the subject development application, staff attempted to quantify certain characteristics, namely building size and massing, in order to identify what might be considered a compatible development within the neighborhood. To accomplish this, staff reviewed building permits issued by the City for each property within the tract. Where building permits were not available (in two instances), data was used from the Property Information Management System (PIMS) hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's office. Staff notes that building size referenced in this report is inclusive of garages, patios, porches, etc., to account for massing which has been identified as a primary concern of the neighborhood. All data gathered regarding building square footage is approximate and has been organized into a spreadsheet which provides the average size of residences in the tract currently, as well as the average size of houses by decade since the tract was developed. Page 190 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 4 Further, since development along the southside of Camino Predera has been of particular concern to neighborhood residents, data collected by staff also provides the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera. This spreadsheet is included with this report as Exhibit E. The applicant has provided documentation showing two efforts to address concerns. First, the building could have been designed so that the top elevation is 14 feet above the street, whereas the applicant is only proposing 10 feet 6 inches above the street. Second, the eave has been truncated on the east and west, reducing the profile of the roof. Staff notes that while the Development Code does not provide an objective definition of the term "compatibility," the proposed development requires discretionary review by the Planning Commission pursuant to Sections 17.16.140.B.1 and Section 17.122.020.G.i of the Development Code. As such, certain findings are required to be made, including a finding that a proposed project must be consistent with the General Plan (Section 17.16.140.F.1). While staff acknowledges that height and massing could be even greater, staff feels that the applicant could further reduce the roof height. As such, staff does not support the project for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035 was approved by Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. As of 2019, 21 lots within the tract had been developed, with 3 more lots having been approved for development as recent as 2018 and 2019. 14 lots remain undeveloped, each of which are located on the south side of Camino Predera. Of the built residences in Tract 10035, 7 were built in the 1980s, 1 was built in the 1990s, 13 were built in the 2000s, and 3 houses have been approved in the 2010s, one of which is currently under construction. Generally, the average size of houses in Tract 10035 have increased from 3,128 square feet in the 1980s to an average of 4,237 square feet for those projects approved in the 2010s. This increase in size over time would seem to support certain neighborhood concerns that recent development has been out of character for the neighborhood. Based off building permits and PIMS data, which again, for the purposes of this review includes the cumulative building square footage of garages, patios and porches, etc., the average sized residence in Tract 10035 currently is approximately 3,912 square feet. Further, the average size for residences along the south side of Camino Predera, is slightly larger at 3,918 square feet. At 4,889 square feet of living and garage area, the proposed residence is larger than the average residence in the tract (3,912 square feet), larger than the average sized residence along the south side of Camino Predera (3,918 square feet), and larger than the average residence approved during the 2010s (4,237 square feet). Notably, when including porches and decks to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permits and PIMS data (374 square feet proposed), the proposed residence increases to 5,263 square feet. Further, the massing of the proposed residence is accentuated by the height of the roof peak which is 10 feet and 6 inches above the curb face on Camino Predera. Staff has recommended to the applicant that the appearance of massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. Page 191 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 5 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, which conflicts with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures, etc. The existing residence to the west is also constructed at the minimum side yard setback, increasing the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape. It should be noted that staff is currently considering amendments to the development code to increase minimum setbacks and reduce building height maximums within the Camino Predera neighborhood in a direct effort to address persistent neighborhood concerns regarding these development standards. It is anticipated that these code changes will be ready for public hearings within the coming months. 3. General Plan Compatibility: Staff asserts that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." As evidenced by comments received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019, and considering long-standing concerns regarding the scale of development proposed both within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera, the proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. Staff acknowledges that the proposed project will develop a vacant lot which might provide an economic benefit to the property owner, however building permit and PIMS data gathered for this report reflect that the average size of residences within Tract 10035 have increased since the tract was approved in the 1980s, and that the proposed project is larger than the average residence in the tract which would further exacerbate this trend. Staff contends that this noted growth in average house size correlates to the persistent neighborhood concerns. B. Minor Exception (DRC2018-00473): The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 -feet with a minimum 3 -foot separation between the stepped walls. The project includes retaining walls up to 5 feet -2 inches in height. The additional retaining wall height is necessary to lower the height of the foundation of the residence in order to reduce the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera. The applicant has filed Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 requesting the additional retaining wall height. A Minor Exception permits an additional 2 feet above the maximum permitted wall height. While staff supports the applicant's intent to lower the height of the proposed single-family residence, staff cannot support the proposed Minor Exception as the project is not consistent with the intent of the General Plan to "promote complementary infill development." The findings of facts below do not support the necessary findings, which are required by the Development Code: Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Fact: The proposed Minor Exception to permit additional retaining wall height is not consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan encourages complementary infill development (General Plan Policy LU -2.4). The related Hillside Design Review (DRC2017- Page 192 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 6 00244) is for a 4,118 square foot single-family residence which is not complementary to surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average house size within Tract 10035 (based on the existing and approved residences within the Tract 10035). Finding: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Fact: The proposed single-family residences is not compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area as it is significantly larger than the other residences in the same tract (Tract 10035) and is proposed to be constructed at the minimum side yard setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding the lot. Finding: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Fact: The proposed increase in the maximum permitted retaining wall height is necessary to lower the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera. Staff supports increasing the retaining wall heights on the project site to further reduce the height of the residence as seen from Camino Predera. Finding: The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact: The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege as the additional retaining wall height is related to a proposed single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks. The City has been contacted by property owners in the surrounding neighborhood who are opposed to the project based on the size of the proposed residence, the height of the residence above curb face on Camino Predera and the width of the project (built at minimum setbacks). C. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Guglielmo, Wimberly and McIntosh) on October 22, 2019. A resident read a letter in opposition to the project during the public comment portion of the meeting. Staff presented the project and outlined the reasons why the project was not being supported as presented including lack of conformance with the intent of the Hillside Design Guidelines, neighborhood compatibility, and inconsistency with the General Plan. Staff also noted that the side elevations of the proposed residence should be enhanced by adding additional horizontal siding to match the front and rear elevations. The Committee stated that they were generally in support of the architecture of the proposed residence, but in the context of this specific location, they understood the neighbor's concerns and recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission without a recommendation for review by the full Planning Commission. The applicant did agree to add the requested horizontal siding to the side elevations of the residence to match the front and rear elevations. Those changes are reflected in the building elevations attached to this report (Exhibit B). Page 193 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 7 D. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting in the Rains Room at City Hall on June 10, 2019, with approximately 20 persons in attendance. The applicant provided a general overview of the project and fielded questions. The attendees raised concerns related to the building height as seen from Camino Predera, the width of the residence (built to the minimum 5- and 10 -foot setbacks), and the size of the residence as compared to older homes along Camino Predera. The applicant responded that lowering the residence would steepen the driveway to the point that it would be difficult to navigate, that reducing the width of the residence would make it difficult to construct a 3 -car garage and that the size of the residence is in keeping with the existing residences most recently constructed along Camino Predera. The neighbors stated that the size of the recently constructed residences along Camino Predera were not in keeping with the intent of Hillside Design regulations and were too large compared to the older residences constructed along the street. E. Public Art: Residential development projects of fewer than 4 units are exempt from the public art requirement. F. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The project also qualifies as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, which covers minor alterations in land use limitations including allowing additional wall height due to onsite grades. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed by an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages infill development that facilitates sustainable and attractive development that complements the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single-family residence is significantly larger than those in the surrounding neighborhood, and the proposed residence is being built to the minimum side yard setbacks, increase the appearance of overbuilding the lot. Page 194 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 8 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. To date, no comment/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit C - Correspondences Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Comments (October 15, 2019) and Action Agenda Exhibit E - Tract 10035 Data Exhibit F - Tract Map 10035 Page 195 e£Lls "VVNOWVOM� OH"N ezzws n 7n L%L9-146 (6e5) V?J3MSJ oNM1JV� Gees h4115 V7 'CNrWn a Q si4NW 'LVm ONUM N 9591 3uo�5ILf 7N1ro�alN 01mg Nr3115 :31111 a B ii Jai s§ R m —7ai- IAQa a5aa5a bbbbbbb ,Its o e � ! V-t�r T ,1 �yO �'or Q axe IRDS ci 4 Jy J ONIWVID Exhibit B �L 9 o 12 197 e 199 MUG V0 •V%m"nO omowN Br:twi k:)n LGL9-196 (UM) V213O3Nd ONt4V] V09 PAIS "'QNV1dl1 � Q i 3WOli ,NVWSiiVa7~ W019f1" M3N I �Vm i9W:)UNICORN N 969. �NI'No11�na1sNo� soaave Z VNINWNSN MNJ 3lt�t ,NSQ-�in� v s YS e 199 � a aE�i6 a� 'aeNOWv�n� orr�Na� eases • �n LsLg-iss uses) � aaaaaad oNW1a0 seessevols bear. a� 'aNaldn .Lam IDNo032� N g5gl a ` Q� 3woH ,NaW51dp21O,, Wolsmam3N �vl 'No!!MNIGN= 9006ae C 9NISaMa k 1NON 3i1�1 rn�ns a � a e 201 BCL16 VO VWWr�m or, va O Btt466 a an L6L9-146 (6B6) daga3ad orQ 5f04 r4L16 "'arida . s Q 1.dm �rllaaaa N 9691 S 3WOH ,f4vwSi4m). WO1510 aGN aril 'r>o�arlassr�m sooan n NOIIIVA31 1NO?�� Mlu :a3rnmg q � e 201 e 202 M16 V:)'V9NOWV= OMONbtk BIt5B5 p 71i 1619-i86(6B6) btk3Q3ad ONIWd7 SfiBB 4BLIG dO ONp wn Q Isrw xvm 9NI�c33z1 N glial r �, 3WCH WDIS M3N 7NI'NOl1�12115NO7 5oaav9 a NV Icl 80014 QNZ ;31111 s3a'IinA e 202 e 203 m m efLl6 b7 'YeNOW v�M1� Oh17Nt121 eZLSeS C on L6L9-186 (686) r t+21363t1d ON!•Id� 5 88 ram b:) '(Wi4in' Y Q f fl 5d0015121dW LVM 8 UOSal N 9691 � � NVId NDO-W 3WOH W0170 m SNI 'N011WSIS= WCC VO a r m -751 .19NU 31111 :N3cnnIa 1-t-- e 203 m m M1 l% Y f fl O r m -751 a I c I I I m I I r -J I I Jif I r I obi a Ix I IL I m I I I � Y EE� e Y -1 I M � fu I I LL. I *_ I P;A e 203 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I e I � MUG V3'VIvWWVWo OHONVN elt9e5 a,Dn L6L9-.95 (6e6) W VNRC13NCi ONUVIO 5se9 Mira V7 .04v n � Q 3WOHH WOISM rn3N V�1lwo ± N011b`/�3 N17�N :31lis �tl NOLL wasve d GI :s3aling 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I e I � e 205 eELM d7 .�@NOY1d�T17 Oh17NVs @ltwti N W1 LrM-WS (G@6) 0 A VS9C1RNc1 ON!WIn Seat 49LI6 b0 �n Isowis'l+a J,vm ON60sms N 9641 NOLVA313 1Sb3 3WOk W015n7�f�3N ONI'TIOLLOfi211SN0750a21d9 a N :3'11!1 :momma e 205 e 206 86116 b7 'C%NRNb7R? ON7Nd2i ezzw4 #71 LGL9-.A6 (686) ba3a32k 5dOR15 2i "L16 b� ,aqv dR ; Q *� �{ sNo�l � � �s�m 3WOM NO19n OGN 7M 'NOlL alSNNO:) WSNUMN a 8 W in Y :31111 Naming a � e 206 e 207 6£li6 b7'b6N0YlV?n� ott�Nba 6ttwi a Sn LGL9-146 (666) 7 Va3a3a sd�oo s PRIG.VD'QNVrfc1n 6 >icegNVOW I IfA'7NUCSS N 9591 N'd'ld SOON 3waN wo:sn7 m3M oNi 'NouonaisNoo sooade e 207 e 208 .. O j 'his'• �' =aaEta 51 g o dog d Ilk I fal 1i Jai 11 honE= s Rt � s �a!� i Q �� d kdi€ �� � l�6 1 � w Z5 lk :3 It V iaadza a ��R��d ar�Agka it`��4�7k ney9 reg t� R LQ0 M h !`� ped��„8 � a i cti ' ,i t_ JillISA} � Ej •�J : Jy� �l�k�Yt'si,�li �� J��}- i f+J; 3 �j {+I :� � �f_!i4 rJ �7 s ! � ;i � °t rLu 3C. to tit�� i� � �}•i, � {# I� 3i� �i���;�� f�j{�;i �; � ! � F � ' # ` j t7 I���€���1(.+��f�f.•'!!?�l��=f��s1El=_Ec{%_�_} �a�i.��:,����1f��:.�in�.Iai=J-��--?ri3a __ � �: � ,� �s� It A 1 .11 i ag e 209 E e lMji 3Ala 031813313 DIdIDHd16 p 59zl -4 uBZi �p er LI E tj LSI } r $ d� 71 -,Uri 9U ��# J A r to Y ?• 2 is ry �° °$•� " xsr aLs Lx3 ` a yJ nauns 'a 6 r _ �V83038d ONMV0 t ik o g 3 R o ❑ `c z o U 5 0 a A; e 210 h . oil( e� F� lei 31 hil isNO { E E � E z RI 4 R 1 I I 4 EEc -. A., ril v 8� C�® Page 211 ■ � 11UMMMUMMM1M1M NVIc! VNIINVIci OSLIs VO VONOWdono Ohl7NYNx b zk3G3Zld ONIW v 5f06v SdOOiS .lzib'W 3WOH WOMO m3N 3-1111 BLZSBS q 7fi L6L9-166 d6L 16 1YO 'dNVldf1 SNI 'No�drn SNOV Si N 4641 �i�n�.LisNo� 5oaav� -?amine 3 = W �- ° ku wcq i � ■ � 11UMMMUMMM1M1M , 0000000000 UU2:IIIIII ooa SII 000 X11 e� Bm B�ISII�IIIIIII ����111111 SII SII � e 213 MUG V:) VIDNOL11 OM ON7NdJ eases a on L6L9-185 (roes) VS3ti32id ON1W'v'O 9E99 1,8LI5 VO 'aNV-Wn J 31-IOSC ISL VW Adm eNIGGaN N 9691 'NOI1vflalsw7 7 j 04 NV'lcl VNI1NVIc1 ONI SOdZid'9 Q 41 3 :��i� :iiaa�ing in e 213 Od �0 /A�DOC 11'BIl J CONSTRUCTION October 7, 2019 The City Of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Mr. John Gillison, City Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: CAMINO PREDERA Dear Mr. Gillison, I write to you regarding several matters that have generally been progressing over time in the approval process of properties on Camino Predera and the circumstances specifically surrounding our attempts at gaining approvals for a new single-family residence at 8035 Camino Predera that I believe now give rise to this letter. I am reaching out to city administration and city decision makers to once and for all resolve what are now polarizing issues for neighbors, and to intervene to reduce the extraordinary delays taking place in processing entitlements through to final approval on the street. These issues place both an unreasonable financial and emotional burden on applicants causing harm and they have no equivalent anywhere else in the city. It appears from my numerous discussion with staff that the submittal of DRC2018-00244 for 8035 Camino Predera ("the Submittal") is being generally construed and in some way joined with the proposed future changes to the development code currently under review by staff. Although I do not believe the Submittal is currently subject to any currently proposed or future changes (that as of the date of this writing have not been formally published and are still in the internal discussion stage by staff) there stills seems to be considerable abstruseness in the relevance of the proposed changes to the Submittal. As you may or not know I have attended all of the neighborhood meetings and have heard the verbal recommendations of staff and considered the points in its PowerPoint presentation with the intention of participating in neighborhood discussion and incorporating any reasonable recommendations into our current Submittal. Given the current craftsman style architectural of this project and the numerous design changes incorporated into it over the past 31 months in reviews and re -reviews, I have found none of the proposed code changes to be readily able to be included in our current designs. It is for this reason and the others that I will outline here that we are continuing on in the submittal process to final approval. Prior to beginning any further comments, I would like to provide a brief summary of Bardos Construction's building history. Our first projects in RC were started before the community was incorporated as a City. Over the past 45 years we have constructed numerous residential Exhibit C Page 214 and commercial projects to include two homes on Camino Predera at 8034 and 8054, and also the corporate headquarters of the then Mercy Ambulance Service (now AMR) to include it's lifesaving 911 dispatch center on Center Street. These are in addition to the Mercy Air's/City's joint collaboration to construct a medivac helipad site at Rancho Cucamonga's Fire Station #4 and Fire Training Facility on Milliken. Our projects include several new single-family residences in RC and the village of Claremont and if I'm not mistaken we still have the accolade of having built more new homes in the Claremont Village over the past 25 years than any other builder. We were recognized with several awards for our work there as well as is similarly true with other communities in the Inland Empire. 1 have also worked personally for the State's Licensing Board in nearly a thousand investigations giving expert opinions on those investigations in administrative, civil and criminal proceedings, and I have given testimony before the CA State Legislature on matters relevant to the construction industry. I therefore write these comments as both an applicant and an experienced and knowledgeable member of my profession. Through my many discussions, emails with staff and neighboring residents in addition to a research of the issues through the City's online archives, I have come to be familiar with both the neighbor's concerns and the recommendations of staff in addressing them. As I currently understand the neighbor's objections as both viewed through the record and through my personal contacts and after my wife and I lived on Camino Predera for more than 10 years, the issues are unquestionably solely focused on views of the property owners on the north side of Camino Predera being obstructed by the development of the remaining vacant lots on the south side of the street. These objections have been expressed on many occasions and are codified in the recorded a portion of which is being included here to illustrate a point that begins as far back as early 2001: IF 1AVf71ror7rR"J,'1TTr'!11I! �11II II l[ 1! !I_C11_ R110 Lynn Massey, 8088 Camino Predera, Rancho Cucamonga, thanked the Commission for allowing him to present his concerns. He thought the facts presented were misleading. He showed a picture of his house and indicated that the level of sight from his front door and his balcony Is equal or within 6 inches. He felt the line -of -site drawings were misleading because they show two different elevations for his house. He stated his view of the valley and city lights will be obstructed by homes on Lots 2 through 5. He fell that 75 percent of his view will be obstructed and that he will lose all of his view when trees are grown by the new homeowners. He read from two advertising flyers from Concordia Homes from other communities and several real estate advertisements which highlighted a view as one of their selling features. Mr. Massey stated the community is semi -custom homes with the majority being split level or single story. He thought the Commission originally requested single story homes but staff felt Concordia's proposal for two-story homes was feasible. He believed the property is better suited for split-level homes and that property values may not be increased because the new homes are not congruent with the community. He indicated that if the Commission approved the plan, it may be encouraging a civil matter between a voter, taxpayer, and citizen toward an entity that can't vote or pay taxes and is not in the community. 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 I909f 981 —6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 215 Maior Issues: The following broad design Issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The major issue for any house product proposed on the south side of the street is the concern of residents on the north side regarding potential view obstructions to the south. The proposed house is a true split level design that exhibits a single -story facing the street. This entry IeVel becomes the second floor as the structure continues down the slope. The two- story portion faces south down the slope. The house fits within the building envelope as required by the Hillside Development provisions. This correspondence is to register my continuing concern with what has been proposed and approved along one of the last remaining vestiges of the Red Hill area over the past several months. This correspondence is to formally request that careful study be given to impacts of the referenced and future development of this particular hillside area prior to any Design Review Approvals by either City staff or the Planning Commission. The Red Hill area Is one of the only areas ' within the southwestern portion of the City that allows a unique opportunity for residential development that can capitalize on the natural hip contours and still allow for views of the valley that can be shared by all with proper development of this area. t12- R 9 1- C& Planner's Rggort July 7,2004t i nil - M . Appeal 1&7.2004. While the approved design is well within the City Hillside standards, the appellants are requesting that the house, and others as may be proposed, be provided with a "lower profile" than is presently approved (Exhibit "A"). The assumed reason for the lower building profile is to preserve views from their house on the north side of the street. In a meeting with the Mayor and staff, the appellants stated that their desire is that the house be lowered so that only the roof is visible above street grade. DRC2015-00604 -Planning Commission Meeting - Semler - February 14, 2018: Renee Massy, a resident of Red Hill, clarified that she is not against something being built and she also fell in love with the view. She said their lot is between two homes but because of the curve in the road, the view will be obstructed ( Ms. Massey also spoke during public comment and wishes those comments to be included in the record. They are repeated below) Renee Massey, a resident of Red Hill, expressed concern regarding Item D6. She explained that the new home proposed to the south of her home will block their view of the valley. She asked in several meetings to share the view and they felt the owners should lower their home by 5 additional feet. She indicated that just meeting the requirements is 595 HALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-6797 OFFICE (909) 9BZ-3831 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 216 not enough and the value of her home will be lessened if the home is built as proposed and she believes she has not been heard". Appellants: Renne Massey addressed the City Council on the appeal submitted; spoke on the three reasons for their appeal which include the issue with compatibility, views, and accessory dwelling unit; she referred to two other appeals that were granted and displayed the lots she was referring to; spoke on the loss of views the new home will have on Mr. Rodriguez's property; and expressed concern with the design, height and incompatibility of the proposed home and displayed pictures of surrounding homes. m U CorrMondence Between AIi n n t 26.2019: From: H. Lynn Massey [Mailto: mass(fgmail,com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 9:38 AM To: Paul Cc: r w • Mary Subject: Plans Paul, Thank you for understanding about my daughter's cancer surgery. She is out of ICU... The Doctors removed a 9.5 pound mass and one kidney. We soil don't have the lab results on the mass. It's truly been a hectic 7-10 days. 1 admit I don't know your business... Just like you may not know what a suitable beta score on a balanced mutual fund should be for optimal growth with reduced downside volatility. I assume you agree... we are all experts in our chosen field. Here is what we know: 9 Please be aware that the Galvan's proect appeal was upheld by the City Council. They required them to reduce the overall height of the home by six feet. *Danny Dera's [Lot 3] house design that is currently under construction got neighborhood support and approval and the City Council were pleased with the neighbors support and his design. 9 Also the development code workshops and the pending amendment could be strong indicators that reduced profile is an issue supported by the City on Camino Predera. Here are some suggestions: 9 Please modify the design and placement of the home in order to reduce the proposed street profile. I m not as schooled in design as you but I believe this can be done easily by reducing or redesigning the roof to a lower profile design. NOT a flat roof, that doesn't keep with the style. You could move the pad further down the hill and away from the street. You should be able to use reasonable cuts and retaining walls to get this accomplished. • We would like you to provide a profile design that allows for "view sharing" with the neighbors across the street; your home as is could be a standard for future home construction. if you were building across the street from m home, I would lose a lot of my view. The "view sharing' Cm talking about should- 4 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 217 City lights not just blue sky. l believe you can accomplish this by reducing the size of the structure, increasing side yard setbacks and lowering the roof profile as suggestedabove. Paul, I know you're trying, but all of the nearby home owners who will be affected most by your design should be included in these emails. You took the time to come to us and I believe you need to take the time to go to them as a good faith gesture. As talented as you are and with your years of experience with design, I know with a little more "view sharing effort" you could get almost close to an undisputed support from the residents on Camino Predera. God Bless - Lynn & Renee Massey From: Paul To: H. Lynn Massey Cc: n r • Ma[y Subject: RE: Plans Date: Monday, August 26,2019 11:54:00 AM Lynn and Renee, Mary and I hope your daughter will recover fully and there will be no further complications for her in the future. I read your suggestions below and found them not very helpfulprimarily because they are based on subjective impressions of what you think can be done and because we have already done al/ of those things you have suggested. For instance, we nearly doubled thte distance of the house from the street than is required and have modified the 1s upper) floor to narrow it. Those were done quite some time ago in one or more of the 5 submittals after we showed you the initial plan. As for your thought about reducing the roof pitch, we're at the minimum the manufacturer allows (4:12) before their warranty is void and a tile roof will leak. The retaining wall heights of the design are at the maximum height allowed by the Code and the driveway slope is at the maximum too. I have tried my best to encourage you to seek the advice of a PE without success to make any contribution constructive and relevant to the technical requirements of the California Building and City's Development Codes and tailored to the unique topography of the lot. There are simply limitations on each of these lots individually that need to be taken into account. There is no "cookie cutter" approach that will work on every lot. What was done on Danny's lot can't be done on ours and any comparison of our lot to his or the Galvan submittal is gravely misplaced. Unless you're unwilling to consult with a PE to advise you I don't see how we can progress in this discussion past this point. As for the thought that we should reach out to others on the street, we did that with nearly everyone including you and Lynn and we heard no objections so we proceeded with another 5 submittals over 2 1h years that also went without comment. As for the thought that the city is in de facto agreement with you or that all of the neighbors agree with you that would be another mistaken assumption. There were many at the neighborhood meeting and at the recent development 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3531 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 218 meeting that do not support your views. All of the neighbors immediately affected by our submittal (except Chuck and Suzanne) are in support of our designs and in point of fact the Council denied your appeal of the Galvan residence as it did similarly with the preceding three others riled in the past. As for a beta score, the answer would be less than 1. if I know something about your industry, I think it only fair that I ask you to learn something about mine if it is in fact your intention to participate constructively. Best, Paul and Mary Without exception every application for development of the remaining vacant lots in Tract 10035 that are on the south side of Predera (and one on the north side — Galvan) have been uniformly opposed over the past 18 years by a very small group and there have been four appeals filed over the same period all of which were denied by the Council. Although there have been other submittals in the hillside overlay district of the Red Hill Community, none of those submittals outside the 10035 Tract have been attended or opposed by any of the objectors on Camino Predera. For instance, a submittal originally filed in December of 2018 for 7563 Alta Cuesta DRC2018-01014 for a new 4040 sq ft single-family home was unopposed and unattended at its DRC meeting in August of 2019. In less than 8 months the project on Alta Cuesta has gone from submittal to approvals where in comparison, all other projects submitted on Camino Predera have languished for literally years. DRC2018-01014 illustrates the singularity with which the appellants have focused their opposition. When the tract map for 10035 was recorded it included a controlling set of CC&R's2 intended to regulate the future development and ownership of the lots. After several buy/sell agreements were thereafter recorded transferring ownership of the tract to one or another developers over the years, Concordia Homes of Southern California eventually took possession of the remaining undeveloped lots after having successfully negotiated a change in the CC & R's with MacMain Associated, LLP in March of 2000. The change in the CC&R's removed the limitation on maximum height of the homes previously set at twenty four feet3 set out in the covenants of the CC&R's. By removing the height restriction Concordia was then allowed to ' A copy of the tract map for Tract 10035 is included hereto as Exhibit 1 A copy of the original recorded CC & R's is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 3 Attached in Exhibit 3 is a copy of the changes to the original CC & R's recorded on March 14, 2000 two weeks prior to close of escrow by Concordia. These revisions to the CC & R's removed the height limitation of 24' from the regulations, On March 31, 2000 Concordia tools title to the remaining undeveloped lots in Tract 10035. See grant deed dated March 31, 2000 attached as Exhibit 4. 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-8797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 219 construct 2 -story homes that were within the development code standards still in force today, which they eventually did with the first three of the homes they built on lots 17, 19, and 20. All other provisions of the CC & R's remained unchanged to include two important provisions contained in §2.04 and §8.044. Section 2.04 reads in part: "... For purposes of this Section 2.04, an Owner's "view " shall be deemed to exclude any line of sight from such Owner's Lot which intersects or traverses any neighboring Lot which is of equal or greater elevation at the time the grading and initial construction of improvements of the Project is completed by Declarant. Each Owner, by accepting a deed to the Lot, hereby acknowledges that the line of sight from Lots in the Project at the time such Lots were originally offered far sale to the public by Declarant may be subject to subsequent obstruction as a result of future construction or plantings by Declarant or by other Owners pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Committee in accordance with this Section 2.04 and Article V of this Declaration. " [Emphasis added] And at §8.04 of the CC & R's: "Section 8.04 Constructive Notice and Acceptance. Every person who owns, occupies or acquires any right, title, estate or interest in or to any Lot or other portion of the Project does and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to the reasonableness and binding effect of every limitation, restriction, easement, reservation, condition and covenant contained herein, whether or not any reference to Declaration is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in the Project, or any portion thereof." [Emphasis added] These two provisions expressly make the issue of view obstruction a private matter of dispute between the property owners. K i► 1 1 1 ► ►/ 11 ' I M ` l Given the long history of contention between property owners and the efforts of but a few of the residents of the Tract to involve the City there now appears to be a directive from the Council to staff to review the controversy and recommend Development Code changes to mitigate the issues. ° A reprinting for clarity of the two relevant sections of the CC & R's is included herewith as Exhibit S. 5 A copy of Planning Staffs PowerPoint presentation is attached herewith as Exhibit 6. As of the date of this writing it is the only documentation available that describes their intended recommendations to the Planning Commission. Many of the topics staff presented at the neighborhood meetings were supported by only a portion of the neighbors present. For that reason many of the property owners who objected have written to city administrators independently to codify their objections to staffs presumed recommendations. 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 9B 1 -6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3B3 1 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 220 At the second neighborhood meeting staff proposed the following changes to the hillside overlay in a PowerPoint presentation. A formal recommendation has not yet been released to the public. Those points presented are as follows: 1) Increase sideyard setbacks from 5 and 10 to 10 and 15 2) Add a new regulation limiting the height of the roof above the street and that the buildings can be no higher than one story. 3) Orient long axis of roof perpendicular to street 4) Require varied front yard setbacks 5) Articulate with variable wall planes sj For lots on the south side of the street, the floor plan of the house may "inverted" so that the garage is at or near the street level and the other floors of the residential structure are below the garage Floor 7) Increase the maximum height of retaining walls to 8 feet without the need for a Variance or Minor Exception. a. Where higher walls are necessary, they shall be terraced with a minimum separation of 3 feet between wall faces. b. Retaining walls within the front yard setback will continue to be permitted up to a maximum height of 3 feet. c. Encourage non -cantilever type retaining walls such as gravity walls, with landscaping. 8) Due to the smaller lot areas, structures are not required to follow the contours of the land. 9) Where second stories are proposed, step back the wall plane of the second floor by 5 feet in the front and/or side. In addition to the above staff has articulated two other points verbally through discussion (1) the will of the community and (2) the character of the neighborhood. At the current time senior staff has indicated the area to be governed by the proposed changes would be limited exclusively to Tract 10035.6 Despite the talking points in staffs PowerPoint presentation and staffs apparent intentions to move forward with its same recommendations to be formalized as its recommendations to the Planning Commission, there was no agreement or majority opinion amongst the neighbors at the meeting and there was considerable opposition to the proposed changes with several speaking out against modifying the Development Code at all, believing there was no need for the changes. The will of the community has therefore not been established through quorum or 6 As mentioned previously no formal summary of Staff's recommended changes has been made public. statements made here are being derived from personal conversations with senior staff members. 8 595 HALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENSE #50522Q MULTIPLE AWARD WINNIN[3 LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 221 majority other than it can be characterized as a genuine disagreement amongst property owners. The character of the community has also not been demonstrated through any statistical or impressionistic review. In past entitlement submittals over the years both planning commissioners and council members alike have commented on the record that the Red Hill community is eclectic and resistant to definition. However along Camino Predera the pattern in development has been to construct two-story homes that are ranging in square footage to between 3,088 to 6,175 square feet.? The average size of homes being built on the street over the past 18 years is just at 4,000 sq ft. Given the limited amount of properties that have either waterfront or views in California it is not surprising that these lots bring a premium in value and attract owners who desire larger living spaces and higher quality amenities in their homes. The character of the immediate community along Camino Predera then would appear to support larger homes that would take advantage of available views. The owners of vacant lots along Camino Predera would therefore be singled out from their predecessors and deprived of similar use of their property should many of the recommended changes be enacted. This depravation of property owner rights would be contrast to all other hillside overlay communities in the city and appears to have little justification or merit other than through neighborhood dissention. ion l Given the record, there is little support for any change in the development code particularly when appellant's unambiguous effort for the past 18 years has been to preserve their views at the expense of the vacant property landowner's rights on the south side of the street. "A landowner does not have any right of access to air, light, or view over adjacent property" has been public policy throughout the state since 1898 set both in statute and precedent8 and little has occurred to change that legal principle over the past 120 years. The CC & R's expressly agreed to by all of the owners within Tract 10035 only serves to reinforce and apply public policy in further detail as a binding private contract on the appellants and all others in the immediate Predera neighborhood. It is unfortunate that many of the proposed changes to the development code so far advanced could be easily construed to benefit one party over another in the disagreement and if enacted they unfairly burden the remaining vacant property owners with additional costs, regulations, and delays that deprive them of the implicit development rights bargained for in their purchases. Should the changes proposed be enacted it is a taking of a right through inverse 7 8034 Camino Predera - 4015 sq ft,; 8044 Camino Predera — 3088 sq ft; 8045 Camino Predera — 3628 sq ft; 8054 Camino Predera — 3765 sq ft; 8089 Camino Predera — 3778 sq ft — 8062 Camino Predera — 3212 sq ft.; 8072 Camino Predera — 6175 sq ft. (Areas were determined from public records. 9 See 120 Cal. 488 L. A. No. 322 Supreme Court of California Decided April 011898 — Kennedy v. Burnap, 120 Cal, 488, 488-89 (Cal. 1898). 'The simplest rule and that best suited to a country like ours, in which changes are taking place in the ownership and the use of lands, is that no right [to views] can be acquired without express grant of an interest in, or covenant relating to, the lands over which the right is claimed." 9 595 DALey LANE, KALI5PELL, MT 59901 (909) 98 1 -6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENse #'505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 222 condemnation that is not consistent amongst all of the properties in the hillside development overlays and any new standards will stand in stark contrast to the recent approvals granted to the applicant at 7563 Alta Cuesta who is also within the same hillside overlay as those who own property on Camino Predera. The application of new development standards For one street and not another that is immediately adjacent is in and of itself a prejudicial act that must be thoroughly explained as the hillside overlay was equally placed on all similar topographies throughout the city for the same reason - to preserve hillsides not views. Setting aside the complaints of a few, what now causes a material change in Camino Predera's topography over those in Haven View Estates or any other that warrants such a drastic depravation to each of its property owners? The answer is nothing! The current standards of the development code have served the needs of the citizenry of Rancho Cucamonga well since being enacted by the Council many years ago. Although the appellants may not agree with the Code, or public policy in California, or the private contract they have entered into by purchase, and have chosen to express their opposition through the use of repeated appeals the regulatory scheme is nonetheless rule of law under which we all must live. Attrition cannot be used as the basis for precedent. I urge you and the decision makers for the City of Rancho Cucamonga not to modify the development code for the benefit of such a small group to the detriment of the entire city. if the city fathers are inclined to support one small group in such a way, where will such discretion end in similar matters and rules begin that are necessary to preserve the equitable balance that must be struck by every governing body? Respectfully Submitted, BARDOS CONSTUCTION, INC. Paul Bardos, President DRC2017-000244 8035 Camino Predera Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CC. Mayor Dennis Michael Director, Ann McIntosh Sr. Planner, Michael Smith Assoc. Planner, Tabe Van der Zwaag Mary Bardos to 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 9B1-6797 OFFICE (909) 982-31331 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 223 EXHIBIT 1 TRACT MAP 10035 Page 224 n, .cr e Vi 03 JQ elstA aVll (� . • . SCO • • A ' • fi• c 1S PI! SrCL v • �a yep • e�n�a ON cm CD s 3 r CO CD'� Unary C U C_ `'e . r 'C'S • �p7 . • • t C�j• r . • gyp, 0 Hil! COtintry O • �d • oo 00. CD ��,�, • C' � � ~moi%. d • O • ` • ieN, rapa�d`OBO Chea « • • reek Trail(jcamQnga Creek Page 225 EXHIBIT Z CC & R's TRACT 10035 Page 226 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 wHEn RECORDED MAIL TO: Rancho Associates, Ltd. P.O. Box 7000-311 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Irn 1. a4tii 2--11 kwKr 1.n1 Committee V7 10 1.02 Close of Escrow E RECORDED IM CFF':. _ -r-• . 3 0 TABLE OF CO?iTE'7T5 OF DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RESER4ATION OF EASEMENTS FOR TRACT NO. 10035 CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAM017GA, COUNT-• O T 7 it, T' E CALIFO-11TA PAGE ir0. ARTICLE I MINITIOLp 1.n1 Committee 1 1.02 Close of Escrow 1 1.03 Declarant 2 1.04 Declaration 2 1.05 Dwelling Unit 2 1.06 Family 2 1.47 Improvement 2 1.08 Lot 2 1.09 Mortgage 2 1.10 Mortgagee 2 1.11 Owner 2 1.12 Person 3 1.13 Projects 3 1.14 Record or Filed 3 1.15 Street 3 ARTICLE II USE RESTRICT1¢LI_S 2.02 Buildings 2.03 Signs - _ 04 Via. S 2.06 Nuisance 2.07 Antennae 5 2.08 Animal and Insect Restriction 5 2.09 vehicles 6 2.10 Business or Commercial Activity 6 -i- Page 1 of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:21 AM Page 227 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 pb( NO. Page 2 of I8 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:21 AM Page 228 2.11 Trash 6 2.12 Ila Hazardous Activities 7 2.13 No Mining and Drillings 7 2.14 Further Subdivision 7 2.15 Water and Sewer Systems 7 2.16 Drainage 7 2.17 Solar Energy Installations a ARTICLE III EAPEMEN SANDENCROACHMEIITS 3.01 Utility Easements 8 3.02 Access to Slopes and Drainage Ways 8 3.03 Slops Maintenance 8 3.04 Sight Lines 9 ARTICLE IV LAS:_ USC eE. IRRIGATIO11 AtlD RAIllTQlA110E 4.01 Installation of Landscaping 9 4.02 Exterior Maintenance and Repair; Owner's Obligations 10 ARTICLE V ARCHITECTURAL AND LA11pStAPIN0 COMMITTEE 5.41 Members of Committee 10 5.02 Meetings of the Committee 11 5.03 No Waiver of Future Approvals 11 5.04 Compensation of Members 11 5.05 Correction of Defects 11 5.06 Non -Liability of Committee Members 12 5.87 Variance 12 ARTICLE VI TFRMINATLON AMENDME11T AND SEV RAg__ BILITY 6.01 Termination and Amendment 13 6.02 Severability 13 ARTICLE VII EXEMPTION AND 81 HIS OF DECLARANT 13 ARTICLE VII MISCF.r.LANEOUS 8.01 Enforcement 14 a.. v« .. i.S L:. onu ALtc rlie. L i bes 1+ 8.03 No Representations or Warranties is S.O4 Ccnstrucrivn V; tir_r, -i;!rl Aer. s%nr A!nrr. , r. 8.05 Insurance obligations of Owners 15 6.06 Notices 15 Page 2 of I8 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:21 AM Page 228 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291661 DECLARATION OF COVEWUNTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATION OF EASEMEN?S FOR TRACT NO. 10035 CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTYOE SAN BEPNARQINp,,STATE _OF CALI EO IQ � IA THIS DECLARA'T'ION is made by Rancho Associates, Ltd., a California general partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant." E 8 g H 9 a L;= A. Declarant is the Owner of certain real property ("Project") located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Lots 1 thru 38, inclusive, of Tract tic. 10035, located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 179 of maps, pages 33, 33 and 35, records of Said County. B. Declarant will convey the Project, subject to certain protective covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements as hereinafter set forth. C. Declarant hereby declares that all of the Project shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, all and each of which are for the purpose of enhancing and perfecting the value, desirability, and attractiveness of the Project, in furtherance of a general plan for the protection of the Project, or any portion thereof. All, and each of, these covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements of this Declaration are hereby imposed as equitable servitudes upon the Project, shall run with the Project, and shall be binding on all parties having or acquiring any rights, title or interest in the Project or any part thereof, and their successors and assigns. ARTICLE I DEFUU TIONS {`-'t��l,'..' •ni _ - ]L-06 - B!'r'hltnr•r. '.p _. y __. ... :. V •- '...Z. t3 yrµ! ...W,L L:, Article V hereof. Section l.oz, "Close of Escrow" shall mean the date on which a deed conveying any Lot is recorded in the Office of the San Bernardino County Recorder. -i- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 3 of 18 Printed on 8+22?2019 8:43:21 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 229 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station [d :ZYNE 88-291661 Section -},03. "Declarant" shall mean Rancho Associates, Ltd., a California general partnership, its successors, and any Person to which it shall have assigned any rights hereunder by an expressed written assignment. Section 1.04. •'Declaration" shall mean this instrunent as it may be amended from time to time. Section 1.05. "Dwg1lincs Unit" shall mean a detached building located on a Lot and designed and intended for use and occupancy as a residence by a single family. Section 1.06. ",Faintly" shall moan (1) a group of natural Persons related to each other by blood or legally related to each other by marriage or adoption, or (2) a group of not more than six (6) Persons not all so related, inclusive of their domestic servants, who naintain a cornon household in a D-olling Unit. Section 1.67. "ImRrovemen •• shall mean all structures and appurtenances thereto of every type and kind, including but not limited to buildings, outbuildings, walkways, bicycle trails, sprinkler pipes, garages, carports, roads, driveways, parking areas, landscaping items, fences, screening valls, retaining r•alls, stairs, decks, landscaping, hedges, windbreaks, plantings, planted trees and shrubs, poles, signs, exterior air conditioning and water -softener fixtures or equipment. Section 1.08. "Lal" shall mean any residential plot of land shown upon any recorded subdivision map or retarded parcel rap of the Project which is subject to this Declaration. Section 1.02. "Mortgage" shall mean any mortgage or deed of trust or other conveyance of a Lot to secure the performance of an obligation, which will be reconveyed upon the completion of such performance. The term "Deed of Trust" or "Trust Deed" when used herein shall be synonymous with the term "Mortgage." Section 1.10. "Mortcageell shall mean a Person to whom a Mortgage is made and shall include the beneficiary of a peed of Trust; "Mortgagor" shall nean a Person who mortgages his or its property to another (i.e., the maker of a Mortgage), and "hall include the Trustor of a Deed of Trust. The term "Trustor" shall hn svnrnv^ •� _�.. «, y •• r. _ _,. "Beneficiary" shall be synonymous with the term "Mortgagee". ��--;--cr "yen er" an"il mean the Person or i'erstnx simp.Le interest ci reGUrd to any Lot which is a part of the Project, including sellers under executory contracts of sale, but excluding those having such interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation. For purposes of Article 1I only, unless the context otherwise requires, "Owner" shall also include the family, guests, invitees, licensees and lessees of any Owner. -2- i i r t i SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 4 of l8 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:22 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 230 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88--291661 Sect1_on 1.3Z. Fernan'� sheik Wean a natural individual, a legal right to hold corporation or any other entity with the title to real property. Lectkon 1._17. "Pro iect" shall mean that certain real property described in Paragraph A of the Preanble to this Declaration. Section_• "Record" or "Filed" shall mean, with respect to any document, the recordation or filing of such dccurent in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California. e5 ctysD-1�-15. "Street, shall mean any street or other thoroughfare, shown on any recorded subdivision map or parcel nap of the Project. The foregoing definitions shall be applicable to this Declaration and also to any Declaration of ,amendment, unless otherwise expressly provided, recorded pursuant to the provisions of this Declaration. ARTICLE II SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 MSE IS All real property within the Project shall be held, used and enjoyed subject to the following limitations and restrictions, subject to the exemptions of Declarant set forth herein: ti 2 single Family Residg_n_s•e. Each Lot shall have a Dwelling Unit constructed thereon which shall be used as a residence for a single Family and for no other purpose. Section_2-0 pUildings. No Dwelling Unit shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain in any Lot other than one detached Dwelling Unit designed to accommodate no more than a single family and its servants and occasional guests, plus a garage and fencing and such other Improvements as are necessary or customarily incident to a single Family Dwelling unit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an accessory structure (i.e., gazebo, cabana, etc.) may be erected with the Article v of this Declaration. Anything contained in thi3 arc-rinn to the rnntrnry nor ithstandinq, no accessory structure MTv he n1a ced on the Lot until Uvner ootains 61� complies with all governmental idws, ir.1u l.y, 4 to, the setback requirements required by zoning ordinance (a). In addition to the foregoing, the precise design and placement of all structures on all Lots with the Project shall be subject to approval by the Design Service -3- Page 5 of 18 Printed on 8 22 2019 8:43:22 AM Page 231 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE Comm � 88-491%1iildi of the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior t° the of building Perr,its. issuance advetn9 device obi !{O sign, poster, billboard, displayed to the Publictviewnan display o any kind shat! be any Lot, •Without the on anY Parti an °f the Project or except one sign for each ot,,,Gljngnunonsennt roil the Cvamittec• square feet, advertising the ping tn't, :•ore thanrOpert except signs, regardless of size, Y far sale or rent, or successors or assigns, for directional ed by Declarant, or to advertiseect du or informationits period. All signseorrbillbvardsng he construction andsalefor the regulation thereof sha all applicable ll conform to the requirements of governmental ordinances, promulgated of be�r:nt'as setEgrt s• Subject to the exemption Improvement, or other Obstructionsshallplion,anted, no vegetation, constructed, or maintained on an a h location such height as to unreasonablyY Cat in such location or of Lot in the project. Each Owneofsaruct the view from a the periodic trimmingLot shalt be responsible other located on and pruning of all hedges shrubsnas dt for from adjacent Lots' so as to not unreasonably obstruct and trees acen� In the event of a d the view to the obstruction of view from a Lot, such dispute shall be dispute between owners as submitted to the Committee, whose decisions °h such natter be binding. Any such obstruction shall, upon request °t the Committee, be removed shalt of the Committee, or otherwise altered to the satisfaction obstruction is by the Owner of the Lot upon wk- Obstruction said located. In the event that any owner shall fail withetheeor requests of se alter any such obstruction authorized a Che Co°unittee, the Committee or itsin dulywritten notice ototthe or agentsowner of ' upon fifteen (15) days y right to correct such condition$ and41 enteron Y prior for the L°t, shall have the for the Purpose of doing s°, and such Owner p such Owner's Lot recoverablehb Cthe tee of the cost thereat, Such shall pcosttly Article IV o y the Committee in the same manner shall be 2.04, an Owner's this Declaration. For purposes g as set forth in sight from sl,,.K n,._1. , shall be de"pri +. f this Sline c3 -t '-filch intersects or line ct time the Lot which is of equal or traverses any time the grading and initial ctrl=t_rg Projnrr. �; , _ 4 greater deed to i • tau OY 1�erla-j - "n at lots �' LY acknowied ' by accepting a 1n the project at the t ges that the line of sight from Offered for sale to the time such Lots were subsequent obstruction d5ublie by Declarant nay originally Plantings by i]eclarant or by result of future ebe subject to specifications a the Owners pursuantrtotion or Section 2.04 Ind Article by the Committee in accordato PlanWitands Article v of this Declaration, the maximum -4- SAN 4- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 6 of 18 Printed on 8:2212019 8:43:22 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 232 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291%1 roof height of Lots 1 tc� 21 inclusive shall not exceed twenty-four (24) feet above top of tura at the center of th,, lot. ser.Sion 2.95. Temnorary Buildings. Subject to the provisions of Article Vil of this Declaration, no outbuilding, basement, tent, privy, shack, shed or other temporary building or Improvements of any kind shall be placed upon any portion of the Project either tempgra.ily or permanently. Ito garage, trailer, camper, motor home, boat or recreation vehicle shall Le used as a residence in the Project, either temporarily or permanently. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an accessary structure (i.e., gazebo, cabana, etc.) may be erected with the express written consent of the Committee formed pursuant to Article V of the Declaration. Anything contained In this section to the contrary notwithstanding, no accessory structure may be placed on the Lot until Owner obtains all permit% and complies with all governmental laws, including, but not limited to, the setback requirements required by zoning ordinance(s). Section _2_._06. Ng_igance. No Lot shall be used in such manner as to obstruct or interfere unreasonably with the residential uses of other Lots, nor in such manner as to unreasonably annoy the occupants of Dwelling Units located on other Lots by unreasonable noises, offensive odors, noxious or offensive trade or activity, or otherwise. .Section 2.07. Antennae. 110 exterior radio antenna, c.13. antenna, television antenna, satellite dish, pole or other antenna of any type shall be erected or maintained on any Lot. A master antenna or cablevision antenna may be provided for the use of all owners, and Declarant may grant easements for such purposes. Section 2.08. Animal and _InsectRes�ri-miction, 110 livestock, reptiles, insects, poultry or other animals of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any Lot, except domestic dogs, cats, fish, birds and other household pets may be kept an Lots, provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for commercial purposes or in unreasonable quantities. As used in this Declaration, "unreasonable quantities" shall ordinarily mean more than three (3) pets per Dwelling Unit, provided, number in any instance may be more or less. The committee shall have the right to prohibit maintenance of any a nintil khirh In SLS opinion cunuritutea a nulsanl:e to any other owner. Animni; S.V i6Lc�l7� Lu Vil,vt5, Q4.;C 1rsu1Lfi OL tpulr ilc6n_iee5, tenantci or invitees within the Project must be either kept within an enclosure, or enclosed patio or on a leash being held by a Ferson capable of controlling the animal. Furthermore, any owner shall be absolutely liable to each and all remaining Owners, their families, guests, tenants and invitees, for any animals brought or kept upon the Project by an owner or by members of his family, his tenants or his guests. -5- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 7 of 18 Printed on 8/2212019 8:43:22 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 233 Branch :R03, User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-29if l sent ion_2-09. Vehicles. No trailer, trailer coach, carp trailer, -otor hone, recreational vehicle, trucP., carper, or boat shall be kept or maintained anywhere on the Project, including without linitation, any Street (public or private), in such manner as to be visible fron a neighboring Lot, unless the screened in a designated sideyard behind fencing approvedy Architectural Ccamittec. no vehicle or boat shall be constructed or repaired upon any Lot or Stroat (public or private) in such a manner as to be visible from any Lot. NO inoperable vehicle shall be stored or allowed to remain on any Lot or Street (public or private} in such a manner as to to visible from any other Lot. Vehicles owned, operated or within the control of any Owner shall be parked in the garage of such owner, to the extent of the space available therein, and each owner shall ensure that his garage is maintained so as to be capable of accommodating at least two (2) full-sized automobiles. notwithstanding the foregoing, these restrictions shall not be interpreted in such canner so as to pewit any activity which would be contrary to any ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. iaa_t n_2 M- pu-sineIs or, Connercia Ac JvaCX• 110 part of the project shall ever be used or caused to be used or allowed or authorized in any way, directly or indirectly, for any business, commercial, manufacturing, mercantile, storing, vending or other such non-residential purposes; except Declarant, its successors or assigns, may use any portion of the Project owned by Declarant for model hone sites, display and sales office during the construction and sales period in accordance with this Declaration, and except professional and administrative occupations without external evidence thereof, for so long as such occupations are in conformance with local governmental ordinances and are merely incidental to the use of the Dwelling Unit as a single Family residential home. Sach owner may rent or lease the Dwelling Unit on his Lot by means of a written lease or rental agreement subject to the restrictions of this Declaration. The terms of any such lease or rental agreement shall be subject in all respects to the provisions of this Declaration, and any failure by the lessee of such D:elling Unit to comply with the terms of this Declaration shall constitute a default under the lease or rental agreement. Section 2,11. Trasth. No rubbish, trash or garbage or other waste material shall be kept or permitted upon any Lot, except concealed from view, and no odor shall be permitted to arise therefrnn so 14 to rr.nder the Project, or any portion thereof, unsanitary. unsiahtiy. olrensive or detrinentai to any uu14r property in the viulnity tnernLL o- to its c'"ul..,r.t.,. : m„-,. containers shall be exposed to the view of neighboring Lots only when set out for a reasonable period of time (not to exceed twelve (12) hours before and after scheduled trash collection hours). There shall be no exterior fires whatsoever except barbecue fires contained within receptacles therefor and fire SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 -6- Page 8 of 18 Printed on 8122/2019 8:43:22 AM Page 234 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id -ZYNE 88-2916G1 pits in the enclosed yards designed in such a manner that they do not create a fire hazard. tto clothing or household ec:ta t shall be hung, dried oairedinnthecPrajech a t,landhnoPlunber,ag tc be visible to other property. grass, shrub, or tree clippings or plant waste, petals, bulk materials, scrap, refuse or trash shall be kept stored or allowed to accur..ulate on any portiorscreenedct cfrtr. within an enclosed structure or appropriately v iew . t us v t' No activities ,hall cartioa 1U 2.• - Lot, and ne Improvements shall be be cod on any hick are or might be unsafe or hazardcus constructed on any to any Person or property. r. c ..l na and nri_S11D9• No portion of the a 2 uarrjir. ,• purpose of pining. �} j, Project shall be used for the Pt r or removing vator, oil, gas. drilling, baring, or exploring tr savel or earth. ns, minPralsort�dkfromanylot in the project or other hydrocarbo tic gravel or earth shall b_ exp ect has a need for gravel or so Song as any other Lot in the Proj earth. cor-r ,fin 2.14. Eu—=S d v'ai Na owner shall further subdivide or partition his Lot: provided, however, that this provision shall not be construed to limit the right of an pease (1) to rent or lease all of his Lot by means of a written lease or rental agreement subject Lott nothe tleasednforftransthisient or Declaration, so loto sell his Lot: or (]? ng transfer or sell t+ss hotel purposes: (2} Lot to more than One Person to be held by them as tenants ni common, joint tenants, tenants by tris entirety or me community property. Teres of any such rental or lease agreement shall be ons of this subject in all respects slto the ee ofrsuch1Lot to complye�ithathetion and any failure by the forms of this Declaration shall constitute a default under the lease. V r a d 5 w ms. He individual water ect'an 2.L�• water softener system or sewage disposal system supply system, shall be permitted on any Lot unless such system is designed, located, eansc�un�a�7dsand andgrecth the ommendationsed in dofcany iapplicable •=�n�rnt yna1ti- tiuthority water district and any having jurisdiction. There snas i u� :,c with or obstruction tnetpFo�eCti�lsnfju unlessanadequate alternative over any proper drainage and is first approved in provision is aade for propished writing by the Committee. Any alteration of the a to applicable bl drainage pattern must at all times comply local governmental ordinancesFor the purpose hereof, exists "established" drainage is defined as the drainage which SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR I988.291661 -7- Page 9of18 Printed on 8x22/2019 8:43.23 AM Page 235 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988,291661 89-291661 at the tine the overall grading of any Lot is co;-pleted by Declarant, or that which is shown on any plans approved by the. committee. Each Owner shall naintain, repair and replace and keep free from debris or obstructions the drainage systen and devices, if any, located on his Lot. SectiQn 2.17. 6olar Energy 1nspalla-i2ns, The Cc-nr,.ittee shall approve the plans and specifications for the installation of residential (including swi-iming pools) solar systorx, provided that the Committee determines that such plans and specifications demonstrate the exercise of reasonable r,.eesures to mininize the potential adverse aesthetic impact of the installation on other portions of the Project. The Committee shall promulgate reasonable standards and guidelines against which to examine any such plans and specifications, in accordance with Article V of the Declaration. NO C.:ithstandirg the foregoing, any such Committee approval shall have no effect upon the enforceability of any other use restriction in the Declaration. ARTICLE III t Itation_7.01,. t it aserents. Each Owner agrees, by the acceptance of his deed, that his Lot is granted subject to easements for utility installations and maintenance. Easements for installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved as shown on any recorded Subdivision flap of the Project. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damaqe or interfere with the installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities. The utility easement areas of each Lot and all Improvements in it shall be maintained continuously by the Owner of such Lot, except for those Improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. ,tigEIL n 7.02, Access t S a d ........ W Earh Owner agrees for himself and his successors in interest, by the acceptance of his deed, to permit free access by owners of other Lots to slopes or drainage ways, if any, located on his Lot, which slopes or drair"o fr,- - , r,, -«, a_cess is essential tar the maintenance of permanent stabilization on such slopes or for the maintenance of r.74d -i-fit:':•; .r;; --. _Ii.: ,, �c_C.esl a8. -.:r ta.Lu Otnur Luta. Section 3_47. SIPPQ MAil3trnanQe. The slope areas, if any, Of each Lot and all Improvements in them shall be maintained continuously by the owner of the Lot, except for those Improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. .a- Page 10 of 18 Printed on 8.2? 2019 8:43:23 AM Page 236 Branch :R03, User :3500 Comment: Station Id 2YNE HS-29.lss1 Section I -DA. $.LgLt_1anc%• Ila fence, wall, hedge, or sh*L!: planting which obstructs sight lines at elevations between Vag and six feet above the Street shall be placed or permitted to remain on any corner Lot within the triangular area forced by the Street property lines and a line connecting then at points twenty-five (25) feet from the intersection of the Street linea. or in the case of a rounded property corner from the intersection of the Street property lines extended as it the Streets intersected. The same sight -line limitations shall apply to any Lot within ten (10) feet from the intersection of a Street property line with the edge of driveway or alley pavement. Ila trees shall be permitted to remain within such distance of such intersections unless the foliage line is maintained at sufficient height to prevent obstruction of the sight lines. ARTICLE IV LAIJDSCAPE011 A 7D MbINTEIIAHCE Section 4.01. Installation of Landscapincl. Within ninety (90) days after the close of escrow for the sale of a Lot with d o-4eliing Unit thereon in the Project from Declarant to a purchaser, the owner shall plant lawns or otherwise landscape the front yard and side yard in a neat and attractive canditicn, in accordance with a landscape plan approved in writing by the Committee pursuant to Article V of this Declaration. Within twelve (12) months after close of escrow for the sale of a Lot with a Duelling unit thereon in the Project from Declarant to a Purchaser, the owner shall plant lawns or otherwise landscape his rear yard, and thereafter maintain the landscaping of his rear yard in a neat and attractive condition, in accordance with a landscape plan approved in writing by the Committee pursuant to Article V of this Declaration. In the event such landscaping is not completed within the tine -frame above mentioned, Declarant or the committee may enter on to such Lot and carry out landscaping plans approved by the Committee at the expense of the owner of such Lot. Said plan shall provide for landscaping sufficient to prevent drainage or flow of water from said Owner's Lot onto any adjacent Lot. All vegetation on the Lots shall be irrigated and fertilized regularly. Each owner cf a Lot shall cut, prune, irrigate and maintain regularly the In the eventofoffailure of an owner to comply with any of the fnregninq rngcitrrmrnrf (which r3ilirre shell he rrgardod '+n nuisance!. the Committee or its dulv autnor7zea appointees or agents snail Iso notity the o•..ner ana oireLr. :;uL.7I vuiieL Lu :c whatever work is necessary to secure compliance with this Section. If within thirty (30) days after such owner's receipt of said written notice, the Owner's Lot still does not conform to the requirements of this Section, the Committee or its duly authorized appointees or agents shall have the right either to seek any remedies at law or in equity which it may have or to enter upon the offending Lot and remove weeds, rubbish or other materials and do all things necessary to place such Lot in -9- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page I I of 18 Printed on 8122-2019 8;43:23 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 237 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station 1d :ZYNE SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 `iN-291661 compliance with this Section, including the installation, irrigation and fertilisation of vegetation and other landscaping. The Cormittee shall have the right to order such work to be accaaplished by any third party at any tire attar sending notice to such Ouner. The Committee shall have the right to commence an action at law against any such Owner to recover the cost of such work. Interest shall accrue on such delincp_tent amounts at the rate of ten percent (144) per annur fron and after expiration of such thirty (3a) day pericJ, and any judgment in favor of the Committee shall include all cost of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. Segtion 4.02. g=ri A errs 2b1_igation-2. No Improvenents anywhere within the Project shall be permitted to fall into disrepair, and each Improvement shalt at all tires be Fept in goad condition and repair. Ih tl;c 0Y:4.; - that any owner shall permit any Improvement, which is the responsibility of such Owner to maintain, to fall into disrepair so as to create a dangerous, unsafe, unsightly or unattractive condition, the Committee upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to the Owner of such property, shall have the right to correct such condition, and to enter upon such Owner's Lot for the purpose of doing so, and such Owner shall prorptly reimburse the Committee for the cost thereof. Such cost steal', be recoverable by the Committee in the same manner as set forth in Section 4.01 of this Article. The Owner of the offending Lut shall be personally liable, and his Lot may be subject to a mechanic's lien, for all costs and expenses incurred by the Committee in taking such corrective acts, plus all costs incurred in collecting the amounts due. Each Owner shall pay all amounts due for such work with ten (10) days after receipt of written demand therefor. ARTICLE V ARCHTTEOUPAL Atip LAr405CAPJ1icCO T $eotion 5.01, 0138-2 of Committee. The Architectural and Landscape Committee, sometimes referred to in this Declaration as the "Committee", shall consist of representatives of Declarant whose business address is P.O. Box 7000-311, Ranchc Cucamonga, California 91701. Declarant shall have the unrestricted right to appoint and remove a majority of the raftnbpr5 of rhe r..--4-- ndlority at the members of the Committee and to.fill any vararL: of such majority until the "turnover date" which vhall the thr =�-c- -.. hL.�f C:::.�: ._, 1114..,, J.LicctHt tvV b) of Zito 1.VLs recorded ("Close of Escrow"), or (2) five years following the date of issuance of the Penal Subdivision Public Report for the Project, whichever occurs earlier. Declarant nay at any time assign in writing such powers of removal and appointment t,� any developer of Lots in the Project, subject to such terms and conditions as Declarant may impose. Commencing one (1) year fron the date of Close of Escrow for the sale of the first Lot in tht- -10- Page 12 of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:23 AM Page 238 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE K8-291661 Project to a purchaser (other than a developer) frc- Ceclarant. the Owners of a na]ority of the Lots (excluding Lot awrcd ty Declarant) shall have the power to appoint in writing one (i;. nember to the Carmittee, until the turnover date. Thereafter. the Owners of a majority of the Lots (including Lets owned Ly Declarant) shall have the power to appoint and rer..ove all of t"n members of the Cove ttee. Members of the Committee appointed t� the Ccrmittee by Cecla:ant nvud nit be resi-'ents of the Prcje-:- but all other members of the Committee must be full ti. -.c residents of the Project. Section 5.6Z. Meetings of the Cor�imitt.Oe. The Co:anittee shall neat from time to time as necessary to perfur^ its duties hereunder. The Carmittee may from time to time, by resolution tsnanir..ously adopted in writing, designate a Cornittee Representative (who may, but need not, be one of its renbers) t_ take any action or perform any duties for and an behalf of the Committee, except the granting of variances pursuant to Section 5.08 hereof. In the absence of such designation, the vote or the written consent of a majority of the Coms.,ittee taken without a meeting shall constitute an act of the Committee. nrtion 5.03. ;:p waiver of Future Approvliln. The approval of the Committee to any proposals or plans and specifications or drawings for any work done or proposed or in connection with any other natter requiring the approval and consent of the Connittee shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of any right to withhold approval or consent as to any similar proposals, plans and specifications, drawings or matter whatever subsequently or additionally submitted for approval or consent. Section 5.O9. CornpenEation of Members. The nembers of the Committee shall receive no compensation for services rendered, other than reimbursement for expenses actually incurred by then in the performance of their duties hereunder. sgction 5.05. Correction of Defgcts. Inspection of work and correction of defects therein shall proceed as follows: (a) The Committee or its duly authorized representative may at any time inspect arty Improvement for which aooroval of nlans ja !.,a r «ti:.. n.«: � . �.. : , . however, that the Committee's right of inspection of Improvements for which plans have been submitted and rproved •� _ .. .� .. _.__1 . ., _ 1f .; a1LGL a..us .+�i r: ... a. N:v.�:.int given written notice to the Committee of- such ycompletion. The committee's rights of inspection shall not terminate pursuant to this paragraph in the event that plans for the work. of Improvement have not previously been submitted to and approved by the Committee. If, as a result of such inspection, the Committee finds that such Improvement was done without obtaining approval of the plans therefor or was not done in substantial compliance with the plans approved by the Conmittee, it shall -11- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 13 of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:23 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 239 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-M661 notify the owner in writindays saizometto inspe}tiith speccfyinc Article V within sixty L 1 Y the partictloareguiranthe-oy'nercto take suchlactconhaslna; Otte authority necessary to remedy the noncorpliancc, (b) If upon the expiration of sixty (60) days from the dat4a such noncompliance, the cormittee shall "3743failed remedy determine trie estimated Cost of correetirq or removing the sane, and the Committee, at its option, may record a notice of office Recorder of San noncompliance in the eacefullyfrenedy the the ynocompliance, and the Bernardino and may p for all owner shall :eiaburse the Cor�ittec, upon demand, expenses incurred in connection therewith. if such Gxpethen theJ ;•� not promptly repaid by the owner to the r inittee, Comnittee shall have all rights at law or in equity to colleEt such expenses, in accordance with the provisions of Section :•o' - of this Declaration. (c) If for any reason the Committee fails to notify the owner of any norcorsplianocewith a previously sr receipt ubmitted ed and approved plans within :sixty ( ) d ays written notice of completion from the owner, the ropedvplans. shall be deetLed to be in accordance with said app t elbers, [[either ME �9Sz•nor authorized representativethe Committee nshallybeeliablehtoeany owner any} loss, damage or injury arising cut of or in any Way connecUndCSS with the performance of the Committee's duties hereunder, du© to the willful misconduct or bad faith of the Committee The Jew a prove all committee shall revpro approve sedImprovemcnt, alterationnor submitted to it for any proposed addition, on the basis of satisfaction Of the Committee with the grading plan, location of the Improvements on the Lot, the lor scheme finished ground elevation the cotyle and design, proportions, architecture, shape, height, Y appropriateness of proposed Improvements to views from or typ000ftng Lots, the materials used ritherein Cc haren' the planting landscaping, size, height or location of vegetation Ln a +•�=. nr 30sthetic considerations and the overall benefit or wn ten would ro*"c -.. :1,4 ,:7,L' ': i_... �;.' _ �r�5;�iaratiun the generail}. ,..v .:4_ , aesthetic aspects of the architectural exterior tinishes-and buildings, landscaping, color schemes, materials and similar features, but shall not be responsible frr reviewing, not shall its approval of an plansfrom or dcsi n beof deemed approval of, any plan or design oint structural safety or conformance with building or other codes. gPgtign 5.07. va a The Cor..mittee may authorize variances from compliance with any of the architectural SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 14 of 18 Printed on 8122120 1 9 8:43:23 AM Page 240 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291661 provisions of this Declaration, including without limitation restrictions upon height, size, flour area or placement of structures, or similar restrictions when circumstances such as topography, natural obstructions, hardship, aestt;etic or environmental consideration may require. Such variances must be evidenced in writing, must be signed by at least a majority of the Committee and shall become effective upon recordation in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino. If such variances are granted, no violation of the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained in this Declaration shall be deerred to have occurred with respect to the natter for which the variance was granted. The granting of such a variance shall not operate to waive any of the terns and provisions of this Declaration for any purpose except as to the particular property and particular provision hereof covered by the variance, nut shall it affect in any way the Owner's obligation to comply with all governmental laws and regulations affecting the use of his Lot, including but not limited to zoning ordinances and Lot setback lines or requirements imposed by any governmental authority. ARTICLE VI TERMIIfATI211. AHENt7MEt4T At7D sEVERABILI Section 6.01. Termination d amendment. All the covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Declaration shall run with the Project and shall be binding on, and enforceable by, all owners for a period of time extending until December 31, 2023, and thereafter said covenants, conditions and restrictions shall automatically be extended for successive periods of ten (10) years, unless, by a written instrument signed by the owners of seventy-five percent (75t) of the hots at any time and recorded in the Office of the San Bernardino County Recorder, the owners determine to revoke or change in whole or in part this Declarr.tion, sub)ect to the provisions of Article VII of this Deelaratimn. Section 6.02. Severability. Invalidation of any one of the easenents, covenants, conditions or restrictions of this Declaration by judgment or court order shall not affect any other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. ARTICLE VII rvrnq.+•+n.� ...., r+rif-I nr nr. r.,. vothing in this Declaration shall limit the right of Declarant to complete construction of Improvements on the Project or to alter the foregoing, or to construct such additional Improvements as Doclarant deems advisable prior to the completion and the sale by Declarant, of all of the Lots in the Project. Such rights shall include, but shall not be limited to, erecting, constructing, and maintaining on any portion of the Project owned by Declarant such structures and 2vilr. SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 15 of 18 Printed on 8.22?2019 8:43:24 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 241 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291661 displays as nay be reasonably necessary for the conduct of its business of completing the work and disposing of the sane by sale, lease, or otherwise. Declarant specifically reserves the right to use any unsold Lots on the Project for models and sales offices, and further reserves the right to rent any unsold Lots. This Declaration shall not limit the right of Declarant at any time prior to acquisition of title to a Lot by a purchaser from Declarant to establish on the Lot additional easements, reservations and rights-of-way for itself, utility companies, or other as nay from time to tine be reasonably necessary for the property development and disposal of the Project. Declarant reserves the right to alter its construction plans and designs as it deems appropriate. Declarant further reserves the right to alter floor plans, styles, quality, size and cost of Dwelling Units owned by Declarant in the Project without first seeking the approval of the Committee. Declarant may further subdivide any Lot owned by Declarant. The rights of Declarant hereunder may be assigned by Declarant to any successor to all or part of Declarant's interest in the Project. The provisions of this Article shall not be altered or terminated without the prior written consent of Declarant fo so long as any Lots in the Project remain unsold. ARTICLE VIII j.1&73144RRJ X -11V S-ection_a.ol. Enforcement. Breach of any of the easements, coveannts, conditions, or restrictions contained in this Declaration and the continuation of any such breach may be enjoined, abated, or remedied by appropriate legal or equitable proceedings by an Owner, by the Committee (or member thereof), by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or by Declarant' provided, however, that any matter duly approved by the Committee as provided herein shall be deemed not to be in violation of any provision of this Declaration. It is hereby agreed that recovery of damages at law for any breach of the provisions of this Declaration would not be an adequate remedy. Breach of ,any easements, covenants, conditions, or restrictions contained in this Declaration shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any recorded Mortgage, or any part thereof, made in good faith and for value as to anv hot of the Prniect• but such ngan.,,rC� covenants, conuitions, and restrictions sndil me binding ano effective against any Owner of a Lot or Lots whose title they< -t43 sec it gn 8,02. Costs and Attorneys few. If an action is instituted in a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce any of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, or easements contained in this Declaration, the party against whom the judgment decree, order, or declaration is entered shall, and agrees to, pay all costs of suit and a reasonable attorney's fee, such as may be established by said court. 14 SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 16 of 18 Printed on 8!22.'2019 8:43:24 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 242 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291661 Se t n res tatio s o W n < 5. No representations or warranties of any kind, express qr implied, have been given or made by Declarant, or its agents or ernplol'ee in connection with the Project or any portion of theProject dealing with its physical condition, zoning,compliance applicable laws, purpose for intended use, nor in connection with the subdivision, sales operation, or use of the Project except as specifically and expressly set forth in this Declaration and except as may be filed by Declarant from time to time with the California Department of Real Estate or with any other governmental authority. Every Se 04. conal tive Notice and Acceptance• person who owns, occupies or acquires any right, title, estate or interest in or to any Lot or other portion of the rrojcct does and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to the reasonableness and binding effect of every limitation, restriction, easement, reservation, cordition and covenant contained herein, whether or not any reference to Declaration is contained in the instrument by which such persen acquired an interest in the Project, or any portion thereof. t' o ?tlri4ob i a o w Each pwrer shale bbee ssolely responsible for insuring all of his Dwelling Units, including without limitation the structural portions such Dwelling Units, against loss or damage by fire or other casualty. Each owner shall also be solely responsible for obtaining adequate comprehensive public liability insurance, including medical payments and malicious mischief, insuring against liability for bodily injury, death and property damage arising from his activities on his Lot. Sect an 8.06.to Any notice permitted or required to be delivered as provided herein shall be in writing and may he delivered either personally or by mail. If delivery is made by mail, it shall be deemed to have been delivered forty-eight (48) hours after a costa oprepathe same has been id, aid, addressed toanypersonat the deposited States mail, p 9 P P address given by such person to the Committee for the purpose of service of such notice, or to the residence of such person if no address has been given to the Committee, Such addressmay� maybenn cnangea ltum ia.e to :a S..•'. _ _. Y ci3r�, has rs:ec%)ted this Declnrntion 7s of this cp._day RANCHO ASSOCIATES, C�} forpia General Ltd., a }'artnership J/r By. .2 -15- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 17 of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:24 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 243 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291*1 S :`A•I W r. F �,`:,.. I I't F r: I :, ,.. C4+U::TY v r SAU B En NARDI!iii 1 t`:is Z°t',day Cf August , 1988, be:orn me the jr.dersiv_ncd a ,.otar;l.ublic in aFei for Bald State, I.ersarall} appeared 1'e%neth F. :eBay, Attornep-i„-1'a-t of Ran. -ho Assec:ates, Ltd„ a California general partnership, 'known I_ to Me to be the ersor. 0:0 exCcutcd the within Instrument on 4chalf of the ParLnCrshiv therein na:nn•l, in,' he a< kr.cul� ,r, ,] to ra. t:.aL :;J`h i�ar �iErs:.:i t>Ye_oteci the sant:, ant] aise known to Ire the prer5on s,•hose name is sibscribed to the within Instrument as Attorney-in-Fa_•t o: RanL!16 AS5o 7jZ:wLS Ltd., and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of Rancho Associates, Ltd., thtireto as a Partnership and his own name as Attorney-in-Fa,tt. tt1.NtLS ny }land anv” ffi ial e11. Sigrat;ry . , auclu " NCO ANN MON14RA W W CCI�� I • r, (r•.,rw E,rm Os L IM SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 18 of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:24 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 244 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE RECORDING REQUESTED BY: First American Title Company WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: First 323 Court Scree San Bernardino CA 92401 Attn, Sheila Glass, 94540 5 Recorded in official Records, County of San Bernardino, Larry Walker, Recorder Doc No. 20000084209 08:00am 03/14/0@ First brican title B 1661 I I M I F1 1 5 i 7 M t M ! 0 ri in I A" I INS N Cr'f loil Cr7 488 ■EI rEM M1 I rcm 5 6 DoE Sr tr SCITiO Hari TAX OA tNAO EXAM ri r.�yy .•z 3 GEffRFI- THIS CERTIFICATE OF UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF ARCHITECTURAL AND 6 LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE ("Certificate") is hereby made as of this y of March, 2000, with reference to the following. A. The undersigned constitute all of the members of the Architectural and Landscape Committee (the "Committee") established pursuant to Section 5.01 of that certain Declaration of Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions and Reservation of Easements for Tract No. 10035, City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, recorded on August 31, 1988, as Instrument No. 88-291661, in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California (the "Declaration"), as appointed by the owner of the majority of lots within the property covered by the Declaration. B. Pursuant to Section 5V of the Declaration, the Committee has approved, by unanimous consent, a variance from those certain building height restrictions established in Section 2.04 of the of the Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the Comr-Attee, by its execution below, hereby certifies as follows 1. The reference in Section 2.04 of the Declaration with respect to the maKlmum roof height of structures on Lots 1 to 21, inuusive, is hereby deleted. The owner of such Lots 1 to 21, inclusive, shat; not be subject to any roof, structure, or building freight limitation, provided that any structure to be constructed all any such Lot(s) complies with the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. The foregoing variance to the restrictions set forth In the Declaration has been unanimously approved by the members of the Committee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the members of the Committee have executed this Cerdficate as of the date first above written. -rIi15Irrsrp,IfM!1TFltr'IFW2n 'h'��R'ir{•r,TR��tA! Pri 3169=179180 4 )4' ly rT. E' A.,vnE0FAF1.Lj Lt'Ji{ tf+ SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 -f - Page 1 of Printed on 812212019 8:43:24 AM Page 245 Branch :R03,User :3540 Comment: 3169"27478v1 SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 MacMalo Associates, L.P., a Washington limited partnership By: Polygon Lands, Inc., a Washington corporation, its general partner partnertner By; G.F. Ledwith, Vice President MacMaio Associates, L.P., a Washington limited partnership By: Polygon Lands, Inc., a Washington corporation, its generqRAPJt By: ccPresint MacMain Associates, L.P., a Washington limited purtoership By: Polygon Lands, Inc., a Washington corporaticn, its general partner By: L.W. Born, Secretary Treasurer Page 2 of 4 Station Id :ZYNE Printed on 8.22;'2019 8:43:24 AM Page 246 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: WASHIN17" STATE OF eAI:IF6Ri4!A ) COUNTY OF —5 waw ) Station Id :ZYNE On March 6 , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for said County and State, personally appeared Geoff F. LeMth personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s.Lwhose name(4 islaw subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shekhey executed the some in hWherkheir authorized capacityoes}, and that by hisGhecltlaeir signature*on the Instrument the person(s)T or the entity upon behalf of which the person(sj-acted, executed the wilhln instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. �Ppa.�SSIpH I otary P lic- Kathrvn L. Sutton : u IJOTgRY+:'Notary Public in and for �; Residing in SkagitCounty the State of Washington S0 Carmission 6pires: 5-9-2002 My �� 02 tWP-TNG-IC N �' kq'o}81yti� STATE OF GAI='FGRllIAr 1 Ss. COUNTY OF SftAGiT ) On , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared pirh;%-A )% pitt- , personalty known to me (or proved lr) me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(e}whose names} islace subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he4heMey executed the same in his;heMheir authorized capacityfie*, and that by his"rAhelK signatureW on the instrument the person(, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(c}acted, executed the within Instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. t�4 �0-) - Notary FKjblic - Kathryn L. Sutton Notary Public in and for the State of Washimton Residing in Skagit County H,v Crnrsissicn Expires: 5-9-2002 3169%27978vI SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 Page 3 of 4 Nort�,:: `-A '9y ''. .......... .•_ -Isl..ot:i Printed on 8/22.'2019 8:43:25 AM Page 247 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF sxAG=) Station id :ZYNE On March 6 , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Lloyd W. Born personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person* whose name(e) IsAm subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that h94he h%L executed the same in hisMerAheir authorized capacity(iea); and that by hisi%eNlheiw signature(" on the instrument the personal, or the entity upon behalf of whi:.h the person acted, executed the within instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. N6tary Pu6lIc - Kathryn 1--ducrm Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Peasiding in Skagit County My Camiission Expires: 5-9-2002 3168518279790 SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 Page 4 of 4 Printed on 8.12212019 8:43:25 AM Page 248 EXHIBIT 3 CC & R MODIFICATION March 14, 2000 Page 249 Branch :R03,User:3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE RECORDING REQUESTED BY: First American Title Company WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Hirst American Tltln Co. 323 Court Scree San Bernardino, CA 92401 Attn. Sheila Glass, 94540 5 Recorded in Official Records, Comty of San Bernardino, Larry Walker, Recorder Doc No. 20000@84209 08:00am 03/14/00 First brican title B 1611 Ir— 2 3 5 i 7M11 -191711M K iA I of I Sial hl C" GIT t" Aon Xe "a Ps I no 5A 6 MON ST 111 fYT GitO TI H TAX OA G1I4 1EX= THIS CERTIFICATE OF UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF ARCHITECTURAL AND s 6 LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE ("Certillcute") hereby made as of .his y of March, 2000, with reference to the following. A. The undersigned constitute all of the members of the Architectural and Landscape Committee (the "Co(qmittee') established pursuant to Section 5.01 of that certain Declaration of Covenants. Conditions g1nd Restrictions and Reservation of Easements for Tract No. 10035, City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, recorded on August 31, 1988, as Instrument No. 88-291661, in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California (the "Declaration"), as appointed by the owner of the majority of lots within the property covered by the Declaration. B. Pursuant to Section 5.07 of the Declaration, the Committee has approved, by unanimous consent, a variance from those certain building height restrictions established in Section 2.04 of the of the Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee, by its execution below, hereby certifies as fc[lows 1. The reference in Section 2.04 of the Declaration with respect to the maximum roof height of structures on Lots 1 to 21, inclusive, is hereby deleted. The owner of such Lots i to 21, Inclusive, shall not be subject to any roof, structure, or building height limitation, provided that any structure to be constructed on any such Lot(s) complies with the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. The foregoing variance to the restrictions set forth in the Declaration has been unanimously approved by the members of the Committee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the members of the Committee have executed this Cenif tate as of the date first above written. R1�f11"rrritr'1rn��C 1n�xR/�i'rrnlAf.Alrtil f 1 71fi51r1Sr,, . . �, 3168SM7978v1 n 't w l;p BE a. E µ:rSHtE-JF hI.L"1 L NO Tlr6L SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 Page 1 of Printed on 8!22x2014 8:43:24 AM Page 250 EXHIBIT~ 4 CONCORDIA HOMES GRANT DEED Page 251 RECORDING REQUESTED BY First American Title AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Concordia Homes of Southern California 1131 West Sixth Street, Suite 110 Ontario, CA 91762 Recorded In offlclal Records, County of San Bernardino, Larry Walker, Recorder Doc No. 20000110994 03:00pm 03/31/00 First bricin Title 9 1 Sol 17 21-13F,11751-1 s 7,11-111 . '!1111 1 /a iii: API aims to C" CRT CPT App NMI PFA Mt PC011 Sl 6 Huls Sr Le SVT CA -Co TSAIS TAX CA 61916 Y A.P.N.: 0207.631-01 thru 11;0207-641.01 thru 10 Order No.: 296391 Escrow No.: 945405 GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) THAT DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER I AX 1S- COUNTY J615"I, jb J I computed on full value of property conveyed, or computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, unincorporated area; I X ] City of Rancho C lcamonea , and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, MacMain Associates, L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership hereby GRANT(S) to Concordia Homes of Southern California, a California Corporation the following described property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino State of California; Lots 1 to 21 Inclusive, Tract No. 10035, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 179 of Maps, Page(s) 33 through 35 Inclusive, Records or said County. MacMain Associates, L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership By1� /J � George Ledwith Document Date: December 17, 1999 STATE OF W RS j4 r N G'r&A) )SS COUNTY OF KI !V G- ) p p On Z before m:,_ _}�. �VArJrUE lu1Lt_1PS�fQ un7A?.N penunally appeared __ (yeaR,GE F LLDIJITA personally known tonic (or proved t0 me oa the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(%) whose name(s) islarr subscribed to the within lastrument and acknowledged to me that he/sbrJthey executed the same in his/lterftheir authorized capaclty(ws) and that by his/her'their signature(s) on the Instrument the peruu:is) ur the entity upon hehulf of which the person(%) acted executed the instrument WITNESS my hand aral official seal. • - R. YVONNE PHILLIPS srgnatort STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary Pub it for the State of Washington Residing in Seattle, Washington NOTARY----- PUBLIC My Appointment Expires: 06-01-2003 MY COYYISSI4N EXPIRES 6-01-03. Mail Tax Statements to: SAME AS ABOVE or Address Noted Below Page 252 EXHIBIT 5 CC & R REPRINTING Page 253 PORTIONS OF AND REPRINTED FOR CLARITY: DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS FOR TRACT NO. 10035 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Section 2.04 View Obstructions. Subject to the exemption of Declarant as set forth in this Declaration, no vegetation, Improvement, or other obstructions shall be planted, constructed, or maintained on any lot in such location or of such height as to unreasonably obstruct the view from any other Lot in the Project. Each Owner of a Lot shall be responsible for the periodic trimming and pruning of all hedges shrubs and trees located on his Lot, so as to not unreasonably obstruct the view from adjacent Lots. In the event of a dispute between Owners as submitted to the Committee, whose decisions on such matter shall be binding. Any such obstruction shall, upon request of the Committee, be removed or otherwise altered to the satisfaction of the Committee, by the Owner of the Lot upon which said obstruction is located. In the event that any Owner shall fail to remove or otherwise alter any such obstruction in accordance with the requests of the Committee, the Committee or its duly authorized appointees or agents, upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to the Owner of the affected Lot, shall have the right to correct such condition, and enter upon such Owner's Lot for the purpose of doing so, and such Owner shall promptly reimburse the Committee of the cost thereof. Such cost shall be recoverable by the Committee in the same manner as set forth in Article IV of this declaration. For purposes of this Section 2.04, an Owner's "view" shall be deemed to exclude any line of sight from such Owner's Lot which intersects or traverses any neighboring Lot which is of equal or greater elevation at the time the grading and initial construction of improvements of the Project is completed by Declarant. Each Owner, by accepting a deed to the Lot, hereby acknowledges that the line of sight from Lots in the Project at the time such Lots were originally offered for sale to the public by Declarant may be subject to subsequent obstruction as a result of future construction or plantings by Declarant or by other Owners pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Committee in accordance with this Section 2.04 and Article V of this Declaration. The maximum roof height of Lots 1 to 21 shall not exceed twenty-four (24) feet above top of curb at the center of the lot. (Amended and deleted 3-14-2000 prior to sale of lots 1-21 to Concordia) ARTICLE V ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE Section 5.01 Members of Committee. The Architectural and Landscape Committee, sometimes referred to in this Declaration as the "Committee," shall consist of representatives of Declarant whose business address is P.O. Box 7000-311, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701. Declarant shall have the unrestricted right to appoint and remove a majority of the members of the Committee and to fill any vacancy of such majority of the members of the Committee and to fill any vacancy of such majority until Page 254 the "turnover date" which shall be the date on which either (1) ninety percent (90%) of the lots subject to this Declaration have been sold and the deeds recorded ("Close of Escrow"), or (2) five years following the date of issuance of the Final Subdivision Public Report for the Project, whichever occurs earlier. Declarant may at any time assign in writing such powers of removal and appointment to any developer of Lots in the Project, subject to such terms and conditions as Declarant may impose. Commencing one (1) year from the date of Close of Escrow for the sale of the first Lot in the Project to a purchaser (other than a developer) from Declarant, the Owners of a majority of the Lots (excluding Lot owned by Declarant) shall have the power to appoint in writing one (1) member to the Committee, until the turnover date. Thereafter, the Owners of a majority of the Lots (including Lots owned by Declarant) shall have the power to appoint and remove all of the members of the Committee. Members of the Committee appointed to the Committee by Declarant need not be residents of the Project but all other members of the Committee must be full time residents of the Project. Section 5.02 Meetings of the Committee The Committee shall meet from time to time as necessary to perform its duties hereunder. The Committee may from time to time, by resolution unanimously adopt in writing, designate a Committee Representative (who may, but need not, be one of its members) to take any action or perform any duties for and on behalf of the Committee, except the granting of variances pursuant to Section 5.08 hereof. In the absence of such designation, the vote or the written consent of a majority of the Committee taken without a meeting shall constitute an act of the Committee. Section 5.03 No Waiver of Future Approvals. The approval of the Committee to any proposals or plans and specifications or drawings for any work done or proposed or in connection with any other matter requiring the approval and consent of the Committee shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of any right to withhold approval or consent as to any similar proposals, plans and specifications, drawings or matter whatever subsequently or additionally submitted for approval or consent. Section 5.04 Compensation of Members. The members of the Committee shall receive no compensation for services rendered, other than reimbursement for expenses actually incurred by them in the performance of their duties hereunder. Section 5.05 Correction of Defects. Inspection of work and correction of defects therein shall proceed as follows: (a) The Committee or its duly authorized representative may at any time inspect any Improvement for which approval of plans is required under this Article V provided, however, that the Committee's right of inspection of Improvements for which plans have been submitted and approved shall terminate sixty (60) days after such work of improvement shall have been completed and the respective Owner shall have given written notice to the Committee of such completion. The Committee's rights of inspection shall not terminate pursuant to this paragraph in the event that plans for the work of Improvement have not previously been submitted to and approved by the Committee. If, as a result of such inspection, the Committee finds that such Improvement was done without obtaining approval of the plans therefore or was not done in substantial compliance with the plans approved by the Committee, it shall notify the Owner in writing of failure to comply with this Article V within sixty (60) days from the inspection, specifying the particulars of noncompliance. The Committee shall have the authority to require the Owner to take such action as may be necessary to remedy the noncompliance. Page 255 (b) If upon the expiration of sixty (60) days from the date of such notification, the Owner shall have failed to remedy such noncompliance, the Committee shall determine the estimated cost of correcting or removing the same, and the Committee, at its option, may record a notice of noncompliance in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino and may peacefully remedy the noncompliance ,and the Owner shall reimburse the Committee, upon demand, for all expenses incurred in connection therewith. If such expenses are not promptly repaid by the Owner to the Committee, then the Committee shall have all rights at law or in equity to collect such expenses, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.01 of this Declaration. (c) If for any reason the Committee fails to notify the Owner of any noncompliance with previously submitted and approved plans within sixty (60) days after receipt of said written notice of completion from the Owner, the Improvement shall be deemed to be in accordance with said approved plans. Section 5.06 Non -Liability of Committee Members. Neither Declarant, the Committee nor any member thereof, nor their duly authorized representative shall be liable to any Owner for any loss, damage or injury arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of the Committee's duties hereunder, unless due to the willful misconduct or bad faith of the Committee. The Committee shall review and approve or disapprove all plans submitted to it for any proposed Improvement, alteration or addition, on the basis of satisfaction of the Committee with the grading plan, location of the Improvements on the Lot, the finished ground elevation, the color scheme, finish, design, proportions, architecture, shape, height, style and appropriateness of proposed Improvements to view from adjoining Lots, the materials used therein, the kinds, pitch or type of roof proposed to be place thereon, the planting landscaping, size, height or location of vegetation on a lot, or on the basis of aesthetic considerations and the overall benefit or detriment which would result to the immediate vicinity and the Project generally. The Committee shall take into consideration the aesthetic aspects of the architectural designs, placement of buildings, landscaping, color schemes, exterior finishes and material and similar feature, but shall not be responsible for reviewing, not shall its approval of any plans or design be deemed approval of, any plan or design from the standpoint of structural safety or conformance with building or other codes. Section 5.07. Variances. The Committee may authorize variances from compliance with any of the architectural provisions of this Declaration, including without limitation restrictions upon height, size, floor area or placement of structures, or similar restrictions when circumstances such as topography, natural obstructions, hardship, aesthetic or environmental consideration may require. Such variances must be evidenced in writing, must be signed by at least a majority of the Committee and shall become effective upon recordation in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino. If such variances are granted, no violation of the covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Declaration shall be deemed to have occurred with respect to the matter for which the variance was granted. The granting of such a variance shall not operate to waive any of the terms and provisions of this Declaration for any purpose except as to the particular property and particular provision hereof covered by the variance, not shall it affect in any way the Owner's obligation to comply with all governmental laws and regulations affecting the use of his Lot, including but not limited to zoning ordinances and Lot setback lines or requirements imposed by any governmental authority. Page 256 Section 8.04 Constructive Notice and Acceptance. Every person who owns, occupies or acquires any right, title, estate or interest in or to any Lot or other portion of the Project does and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to the reasonableness and binding effect of every limitation, restriction, easement, reservation, condition and covenant contained herein, whether or not any reference to Declaration is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in the Project, or any portion thereof. Page 257 EXHIBIT 6 PLANNING STAFF POWERPOINT Page 258 Jane and John Adams 8045 Camino Predera Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 605-3312 September 26, 2019 Via Certified Mail #70171070 0000 3406 1225 Mr. John R. Gllllson City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Gillison: RE: THE HILLSIDE ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO CAMINO PREDERA IN THE RED HILL AREA am appalled, bewildered and disheartened. My husband and I are owners of Lot 12 of Tract 10035 otherwise known as 8045 Camino Predera, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, along with two (2) adjoining vacant lots (Lot 11 and Lot 10), all which we purchased 12 years ago. The land Is governed by the Hillside Development Ordinance and located in the Red Hill area. 8045 was purchased with approved pians and we built the house pursuant to those plans, over a decade ago. Our intent was to build two more houses, in the future, for family members. Our expectation was that we could build similarly in accordance with the plans approved for Lot 12. As I am sure you may already be aware that since 2004 ---and before ---Lots 1-21 of Tract 10035 have been the subject of much discussion at the "Neighborhood Meetings" (which often turned venomous), the Planning Department, Design Review Committee, Planning Commission and City Council. Applicants desiring to building on those lots have been denied, discouraged and derailed with obstructive and irrational objections. Notwithstanding the fact that an applicant may have met all the technical requirements, they have been forced to attend meeting after meeting, multiple resubmissions of their plans and delays of, not just months, but years! ---all In an effort to appease a handful of vocal opposition, who is willing to mount an onslaught of objections and appeals. What I have witnessed over all this time is that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, appearing to "take sides", has provided the same few individuals (hereinafter referred to as "dissenters") a platform from which they have created dissension among the residents of Red Hill and lashed out with ad hominem attacks at applicants during many meetings. I have recorded a litany of statements made during some of these meeting just as an example: "You might reconsider building a two-story house, as you're getting older and climbing stairs will become more difficult." WHATI I??? This is a valid objection to an applicant's otherwise complete plans???? Who is running these departments? From our vantage point, it looks like the dissenters are In controll So, here we are, 12 years later, and are ready to begin building on the other two lots. However, what we have encountered within the planning department has left us shocked and dismayed. Page 259 Mr. John R. Glllison -2- September 26, 2019 There is a movement afoot (and consultants, Civic Solutions, hired) to begin work on amending the Hillside Development Ordinance found In Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. We strongly oblectl NOTHING has changed in the past 12 years that would require amending the hillside standards— NOTHING has changed since the July 7, 2004 appeal to City Council where these dissenters lost their appeal on every level. Nonetheless, they are once again expressing their disagreement with the decisions against them made by the local authorities, notwithstanding the fact that there were NUMEROUS thorough and de novo reviews by each department. Instead of taking their issues up for a judicial review, they continue objecting to most projects. In my opinion, it is a blatant attempt to discourage anyone from building on the southside of Camino Predera. We are not discouraged. I apologize for the length of this letter but I feel it necessary to explain our personal dilemma with any proposed changes to the Hillside Ordinance. I quote from a letter written by dissenters Chuck and Suzanne Buquet, dated April 5, 2004 and presented as an exhibit in the July 7, 2004 City Council agenda, involving our lot #12. The appeal was denied. The Buquet's wrote, and I quote, "We believe that a master plan approach should be undertaken to determine what would be reasonable and prudent residential product along the entire hillside slope area, and not just on a case by case basis as currently being provided under the Individual lot development strategy..." The Buquet's "master plan approach" is inconceivable. All one need do is visually inspect Camino Predera to see that each and every southside lot is unique. It only makes sense that each lot should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking Into consideration the topography. Our three lots are above curb and, therefore, we paid a premium for those lots. To reduce our ability to build out our remaining two lots in the same manner we built the first lot would create an unjust and unreasonable result. First and foremost, the houses directly across the street from us are two and three-story. As is the situation with our current house, the height is 14' above curb level; at that height, the houses on the north side are so high that they look directly over our property. As for requiring us to push the house further below the curb not only makes It much more difficult and costly to accomplish because of the steepness but doing so would eliminate ANY view our "view lot" could have because of the protected silk oak trees at the bottom of the lot, along with the row of townhouses, blocking ANY view. We would literally be in the gully. I will repeat Councilmember Howdyshell's sentiments at the July 7, 2004 Council Meeting, that he could not imagine somebody wanting to build on a hill and then accepting a requirement to set their house down In a hole. I agree, and I add: Talk about diminution in value??11?? Another dissenter and appellant, Renee Massey, already acknowledged at the July 7, 2004 City Council Meeting, where one of her appeals was heard, that the "crux of the matter" was if this project were approved ( DRC2003-00961--referring to our house, lot #12) It would set the standard for the rest of the lot -by -lot development. This project was approved. I believe the standard has been set. I am aware that the Hillside Development Ordinance requires a four -pronged approach to analysis for approval of a project. However, I do have some questions as to how, why and who initiated action for amendment of this code. But I will refrain from expounding on that at this juncture. Suffice it to say that Page 260 Mr. John R. Gillison -3- September 26, 2019 any development will change and/or impede the view prior to the development. Our city's development code is replete with discretion provided to the decision -makers (and I don't mean the dissenters) to further the General Plan and allow for reasonable development of land. However, our city's Development Code also boldly asserts that applicants should attempt to minimize view obstruction -----understanding that it is generally Impossible to eliminate view obstruction. Title 17 expressly provides for specific procedures in order to initiate action for amendments to the Code. The city's website states that citizens rely on the city manager to "provide complete and objective information, pros and cons of alternatives, on long-term consequences." There are other lot owners on Camino Predera who are similarly situated and express utter frustration, as it appears that no one from the city is listening to the remaining vacant lot owners of Tract 10035. In fact, the DRC is supposed to "...provide direction to applicants regarding their development application." My experience and observations have shown that not to be the case. Obstructing and ignoring concerns that are not aligned with the dissenters seems prejudicial. Therefore, we ask that you look more deeply into the appropriateness of this movement by a handful of dissenters to amend the Code. My husband and I ask: For what purpose does the Code require amending? As this movement is steamrolling over others' rights, I ask that you keep in mind the Mission Statement for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to "make decisions, and be perceived as making decisions, for the general welfare of the community." And not for a few favored dissenters. I thank you for your time and my husband, John Adams, who has been a general contractor for over 47 years, wishes to address each proposed amendment as provided at the September 9, 2019 "Community Workshop #2". His comments are attached along with the proposed amendments. I hope you can understand and appreciate OUR concerns. We welcome your comments. Sincerely, Jane Adams Cc: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Anne McIntosh, Planning Director Mike Smith, Principal Planner Jean Ward, AICP (Civic Solutions) Page 261 I have heard a lot of comments about Red Hill's character and how special Camino Predera is and I feet most of it has been mischaracterized. I have lived in Rancho Cucamonga since 1985 and have lived on Camino Predera for the past ten years. While the view Is wonderful, it is also a great burden. People stop in front of the empty lots to see the view (even though It is posted "no stopping "at anytime, people somehow feel It Is their right to eat their food, drink their beers and do their drugs. Then they feel they have the right to get out of their cars and trespass on my land (which I had posted no trespassing until they tore the signs down) and then throw all their trash on my property and/or in the street. Much more goes on than I can put in this letter. The street also has a very steep incline often used by skaters and bike riders as a racetrack. Lots of cars also use this downhill as a raceway; so many cars in fact, that we would not allow our granddaughter to play in the front yard with all the people coming to this "view" and the homeless living at the bottom of each property. The neighborhood has also experienced a lot of break- ins, drug use, vandalism, littering and trespassing that we never witnessed living in other Rancho neighborhoods. My point is this is not the paradise some are proclaiming it to be. It could be a great street to live on, but It needs houses and neighbors. There are dissenters who do not want any development—or so it seems. I fear that adding more restrictions to the standards will keep development from happening. I also fear that that these same individuals would welcome the new restrictions but, nonetheless, continue rejecting designs. There are a lot of changes being proposed for a couple of unhappy homeowners, with talk of overbuilding, massing and mansionization. There are no mansions that have been built on this street, but with the high cost of building on a hillside lot, one needs to build a house with enough square footage to recoup one's investment upon resale. None of the houses built in the last twenty years are tiny houses. Does this not set a precedent? Therefore, I would like to address each proposed change to the current Hillside Design Standards, as it relates to our two vacant lots, adjoining 8045 Camino Predera, our current residence. (1) SIDE YARD SETBACKS - WE ARE 100% AGAINST INCREASING SIDE YARD SETBACKS. OUR LOT IS 76' ACROSS THE FRONT, WHICH IS NOT WIDE TO START WITH. A REDUCTION OF 25'Taking 25' LEAVES A TOTAL OF 51' CREATING EXTREME DIFFICULTY IN DESIGN. MOREOVER, THE HOUSES ACROSS THE STREET ARE SO HIGH THEY WILL LOOK RIGHT OVER THE TOP OF OUR PROPOSED HOUSE BASED UPON OUR LOT LOCATION. I HAVE PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE AS I HAVE BEEN INSIDE EVERY HOUSE ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR LOTS. LARGER SETBACKS ALSO CREATES A PRIVACY ISSUE FOR US. AS FAR AS REDUCING VISUAL MASSING FROM THE STREET THIS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD STREET (LOCAL ROAD) AND, TO MY KNOWEDGE, WE HAVE NO LEGAL OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE VIEWS TO THE PUBLIC. THERE ARE MORE THAN 60+ HOUSE ON CAMINO PREDERA AND ADJACENT CUL-DE-SACS WITH A 10' AND 5' SETBACKS. IT IS UNFAIR AND UNNECESSARY TO SO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE FEW REMAINING LOTS. Page 1 of 3 Page 262 (2) REDUCE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - THE HOUSE WE LIVE IN NOW HAS A HEIGHT OF 14' ABOVE CURB. THE HOUSE WAS LOWERED THREE TO FOUR FEET TO ACHIEVE THIS. OUR TWO REMAINING LOTS ARE ABOVE CURB HEIGHT. THE LOWER THE ROOF, THE LOWER THE HOUSE HAS TO BE PUSHED DOWN IN THE LOT AND THE DRIVEWAY BECOMES STEEPER. OUR HOUSE NOW HAS A SINGLE -STORY APPEARANCE FROM THE STREET AND ALL THE HOUSES ON THE NORTH SIDE HAVE MORE VISUAL MASS THAN OURS. (3) ROOF DESIGN - A HIP ROOF WOULD ALSO CREATE TRIANGLE EFFECTS. (4) VARIABLE FRONT YARD SETBACKS - ALL THE LOTS THAT ARE LEFT ARE GOING TO BE CUSTOM HOUSES. IF IT`S A GREAT DESIGN I CANNOT UNDESTAND HOW A CONTINUOUS WALL PLANE TAKES ANYTHING AWAY FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. (5) ARTICULATION AND VARIABLE WALL PLANES -SIDE YARD THIS WOULD PUT MASSIVE RESTRICTIONS ON NEW HOMES AND MAKE DESIGNING EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. (6) FLOOR PLANS - THIS IS BASICALLY THE DESIGN I AM PROPOSING WITH THE HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NOW IN EFFECT. HOWEVER, IF THE PROPOSED STANDARDS PRODUCE A ROW OF NARROW HOUSES, WHAT AN UNFLATTERING LOOK FOR THE STREET THIS WOULD CREATE. (7) RAISE THE HEIGHT OF RETAINING WALLS - IN MY OPINION, THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN A STANDARD ALL ALONG. EVEN THE CITY'S OWN ENGINEER SAID THAT MOST LOTS WILL NOT WORK WITH THE CURRENT STANDARDS. (8) GRADING- FLEXIBILITY TO BUILD LOWER ON THE LOT I HAVE A LEVEL LOT. THERE IS NO REASON FOR ME TO BUILD LOWER ON THE LOT. Page 2 of 3 Page 263 (9) STEP BACK SECOND STORY WALL PLANE - ALL BUT ONE LOT ARE DOWN -HILL SLOPES. NO ONE CAN SEE MASSING GOING DOWN HILL. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THREE LOTS, ONE CANNOT SEE THE PROPERTIES FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DUE TO THE THREE-STORY CONDOS AND EXISTING TREES. IAM CONFUSED AS TO WHY THIS IS EVEN A CONSIDERATION. MY FINAL REMARKS - As we can build on our two lots using the current Hillside Design standards and not eliminate anyone's view, we feel that if these new standards are implemented, they would greatly take away from what we should be able to build, make the house less desirable and devalue our property. If these proposed changes were guidelines to be considered on a lot -by -lot evaluation based upon the topography rather than as standards to be strictly applied, it seems more plausible and just. The current vacant lot owners should be afforded the same considerations as the current homeowners. It does NOT feel like that. Reasonable expectation is a legal term that I believe applies to our property. We live in a house on the south side that was approved by staff, DRC, Planning and ultimately by city council. When we bought these two lots over ten years ago, we had a reasonable expectation that we would be able to build houses on these lots in the same manner as the one we live In now. Should the proposed changes be implemented, our future projects will be greatly diminished and so, too, will our ability to fully utilize our lots to their fullest capacity. in my opinion, such a taking of a property -owner's rights without a legitimate reason is unconscionable. Thank you for your patience in reading the detailed description of my concerns over changes to the Hillside Design standards. I hope you can appreciate my concerns. I am open for further discussion on any of these issues as they relate to my property. Sincerely, John I. Adams, Homeowner 8045 Camino Predera Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909-322-3850 Page 3 of 3 Page 264 October 6, 2019 To: City Staff, Planning Commission Members, Mayor and Members of the City Council; I very much appreciate that our long time concerns are being taken seriously, with the recent Hillside Development Standards meetings. As you know, we have been dealing with the same issues again and again since 2000. These are the very last remaining hillside view lots in Red Hill and once they are gone that's it, no do overs. And just a quick bit of history dating back to 2004 and in response to Renee and Lynn Massey's Appeal 2nd appeal, the City Council was very clear as to their concern with the size and scale of new homes going in, hillside grading concerns, and keeping the distinctive residential character of the area, as well as consideration of view sharing. Yet sadly here we are again, neighbors who are put right back in the middle of this. Mr. Bardos, who purchased this vacant lot back in 2008, only purchased it to "protect his view" which he told us while he was our next store neighbor. He was also the one who built the f irst McMansion on our street. And while he is very proud of that fact, it has forever changed the character of our neighborhood and not for the better in my humble option. He f irst f iled the residential application with the City in early 2017, and has not once come to us to discuss his plans. Yet our home is the one most impacted by this new McMansion version of Page 265 some plans he found apparently found somewhere. Instead he has tried to work everyone else he thought he could on our street, and now is doing his continuing best bullying practices to move this forward, and will say and do anything to get his way. This is and always has been about what is best for his personal prof its and he personally has no care or concern about the neighborhood. At the Community meeting he suggested the neighbors offer comments, but he was not open to anything that was suggested as to lowering the profile of the house or dropping it down, or even changing the roof profile. He kept saying it was "physics" and suggesting our simple minds could not understand that, and any of our "oh so silly" ideas could not be done. Threw up his hands and said he had done all he could do. All I see is yet another huge house that covers the entire front of the lot, blocks out the sun from our house looking to the east, lacks 360 degree architecture or anything of interest on the sides and is totally view focused on the back of the house. (Profit NOT Community/Neighborhood driven) One of my major questions and concerns is, since he personally seems to have prepared all of the plans, where is any official verification as to his grading analysis, slopes or even ability to build this huge house on this lot? He makes a lot of claims as to why he can't lower the house or driveway or do this or that, but there is no Engineering Professional or Reports to validate anything that he has drawn on the plans. And after all these Page 266 years of this spin and nonsense, I am simply not very trusting any longer. I am shocked that someone can get this far down the road on a hillside, with a dif f icult lot to build on with no legal verification by an Engineering Professional willing to put his stamp on plans at a minimum. And I honestly think the City, Planning Commission and City Council should be concerned too. Respectfully, Suzanne Buquet 8725 Predera Court Rancho Cucamonga Page 267 Re: Amendments to 17.122.020 Hillside Development Standards A very special thank you to the city of Rancho Cucamonga for taking the time and expending the effort to listen to the residents of the beautiful Red Hill Community. The workshops held by the Planning Department give me hope that the integrity and heritage of our neighborhood will be maintained and that the great "view grab" will cease to occur. Unfortunately, yet again we, the Red Hill Residents find ourselves very concerned with the prospective builds on Camino Pedrera, especially with the latest "Mc Mansion" home project designed by builder Paul Bardo. This project is on the south side of Camino Pedrera. This builder has shown a complete lack of respect and is remarkably hostile to the residents of both Red Hill and especially to those of Camino Pedrera. This builder doesn't choose to work with the residents instead at meetings he prefers to bully and insult the residents and the city for that matter. Mr. Bardo is so arrogant that he stated last year, in a city board meeting, that his design/build in Red Hill was the first one -million -dollar home, unfortunately, money and his aggression towards the residents is driving his motives, not common courtesy. The residents of Camino Pedrera will lose their view and see their property values decline. There are other vacant lots and if this build is allowed versus working with the residents to push it lower, that only the roof is seen from the street, as has been repeatedly discussed, it will be a free for all with the remaining vacant lots on Camino Pedrera. More importantly we will be faced with the same battle that we have been faced with repeatedly over the years. This builder repeatedly states we are too ignorant to know enough about the physics of building and he absolutely cannot drop this home that only a rooftop is seen from the street. The residents do not trust his motives and we do not trust that he will listen to a word the city says. The city has been to my house, has admired my beautiful views, and clearly can see that in order to protect the residents on the North side of Red Hill CC Drive, back in 1978 the houses were dropped very low. When did this common courtesy and the notion of view sharing ever stop? The "Mc Mansions" built circa 2004/2005 stand out like a sore thumb and look awful too large for the lot they are on. The envelope has been pushed way too far and residents are at their breaking point. Kudos to the latest project underway, owner Danny Dera, he appears to be building a beautiful property and instinctively is not obstructing anyone's view. He has proved it can be done so for Mr. Bardo to bully his way with the city officials and the residents and claim we are too stupid to understand the physics of building is disgraceful. If allowed it will set the stage for the demise of historic Red Hill. The cascading views that have attracted so many will be robbed by this builder and others on the vacant lots, and potential tear downs and the integrity of this beautiful community gone forever. Don't let this be your legacy for Rancho Cucamonga's most historical community. Sincerely, Rakan and Maria Alamat 8551 Red Hill Country Club Drive Rancho Cucamonga Page 268 October 7,2019 To: City Staff, Chairman and Planning Commission Members, Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Thomas Snedeker (8080 Camino Predera, Rancho Cucamonga) R.E. Amendments to 17.122.020 Hillside Development Standards I am writing this letter on behalf of myself and other concerned residents who live in Red Hill and specifically on Camino Predera. I have attended both of the meetings/workshops instituted by the Planning Department which were extremely informative with respect to Hillside Development Standards (17.122.020). At the meeting on September 9, 2019, we were encouraged by the Planning Department Members proposed Amendments to these standards which include but not limited to reducing the maximum building height, grading changes, the increasing of the side yard set backs and changing the maximum height of retaining walls. As a resident of Red Hill/Camino Predera for the past 30 years, my greatest interests are to maintain the character of our neighborhood while providing adequate view sharing for all who live there now and in the future. I want to thank the Planning Department and the City Council for all the time and interest you have given to our concerns and for future considerations in this matter. Since ely, Thomas Snedeker 8080 Camino Predera Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Page 269 Tabe, 'T/ZTli-? .21+3 PI", I would like some clarity on staffs position on our submittal. I've asked several times for a statement of its position and for several weeks. Is staff going to recommend the project and if not why not? Please be specific when describing staffs position. My understanding after several months of discussion with you and the neighbors is that the neighbor's objections center primarily around view obstruction. Is there any other issue you're aware of that is relevant to the approvals of our project as we move forward? You've previously indicated our submittal meets the Code. When I spoke with jean she said she would meet with staff and provide me some insight into the changes to the Code planning intends to propose prior to their being addressed at the upcoming 8/9 meeting. Do you have those recommendations with the thought l can look at possibly incorporating them to enhance our designs prior to meeting with DRC? I also want to reiterate conversations we've had previously about public policy throughout the state on view obstruction. The statewide policy is quite harsh and definitive on the subject and runs strongly against the neighbors who have expressed a right that is not protected in California. The precedent was first established in 1898 by the California Supreme Court and is still good law today. Has anyone from staff reviewed public policy on the question of view rights to see if positions being taken now are in compliance with statewide mandates and precedents? It's my understanding DRC meets "as needed." The October 1 date doesn't work for us. Can we set a date prior to October 1 to meet? There are several other property owners on the south side of Camino Predera who have also indicated an interest in attending, and I would like the date to work for all those who've expressed an interested being there. Thanks in advance for your help with these questions. Best, Paul Page 270 From: Van der Zwaag, Tabe[mailto:Tabe.VanderZwaag@cityofrc.usj Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 12:50 PM To: Paul Subject: RE: DRC It is too late to get on a September DRC. The next available DRC will be October 151. You will need to submit 10 sets of plans prior to September 17`h to be on that DRC. As discussed in a prior conversation, the neighbors will more than likely be in attendance at the DRC. The Planning Commissioners are also aware that the Planning Department is working on new regulations for the Red Full area. With neighbor opposition, there is a good chance that they would not recommend approval by the Planning Commission. Tabe From: Paul < aul bardosconstruction.com> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 11:07 AM To: Van der Zwaag, Tabe <Tabe.VanderZwaag@citvofrc.us> Subject: DRC �CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or o e achments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Tabe, When is the next DRC meeting in September? 1'd like to get on calendar for it. l left several messages for Matt to return my calls but so far he's not responded. 1 also left a message for his administrative assistant who also hasn't responded to my voicemail. Paul Page 271 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag October 15, 2019 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 771 square foot garage on a 15,430 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. Related Records: Minor Exception DRC2018-00473. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. Site Characteristics: The 15,430 square foot vacant project site is located on the south side of Camino Predera, within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District. The property dimensions are approximately 80 feet along the north property line, 195 feet along the east property line, 189 feet along the west property line, and 80 feet along the south property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 1,301 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line and an elevation of approximately 1,260 feet as measured along the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 41 feet. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Proiect Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, singlefamily residence along with an attached 771 square foot garage on the 15,430 square foot project site. The proposed grading includes up to 8 feet of cut, which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission (5400t max cut or fill for Planning Director approval). Architecture: The proposed residence has a craftsman design theme, which includes a pitched concrete tile roof, horizontal wood siding, shake siding and a river rock wainscot. The proposed 4,118 square foot residence consists of a 2,352 square foot upper level, which includes the main living area and master bedroom, and a 1,766 square lower level, which includes 3 bedrooms and a bonus room. The upper and lower levels each include decks along the south elevations. The 771 square foot three -car garage is located on the upper level of the residence, with the garage door facing Camino Predera. The driveway has a maximum grade of 15 percent. Hillside Development Standard 17,122.020.C,1.d. states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are Exhibit D Page 272 Land Use General Plan Zoning Low (L) Residential District Site Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District Low (L) Residential District North Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Hillside Overlay District Pacific Electric Trail Public Mixed -Use (MU) District South Low (L) Residential District Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District East Low (L) Residential District West Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Hillside Overlay District Proiect Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, singlefamily residence along with an attached 771 square foot garage on the 15,430 square foot project site. The proposed grading includes up to 8 feet of cut, which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission (5400t max cut or fill for Planning Director approval). Architecture: The proposed residence has a craftsman design theme, which includes a pitched concrete tile roof, horizontal wood siding, shake siding and a river rock wainscot. The proposed 4,118 square foot residence consists of a 2,352 square foot upper level, which includes the main living area and master bedroom, and a 1,766 square lower level, which includes 3 bedrooms and a bonus room. The upper and lower levels each include decks along the south elevations. The 771 square foot three -car garage is located on the upper level of the residence, with the garage door facing Camino Predera. The driveway has a maximum grade of 15 percent. Hillside Development Standard 17,122.020.C,1.d. states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are Exhibit D Page 272 DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS October 15, 2019 Page 2 permitted when they are aligned with the natural contours of the lot and are necessary to achieve site design goals. Low Residential District Code Compliance: The project complies with the current development requirements of the Trow (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District as shown in the following table (it should be noted that the City is in the process of developing new development criteria for Camino Predera): Development Criteria Requirement Proposed Front Yard Setback 37 feet 60 feet Side Yard Setbacks 5 and 10 feet 5 and 10 feet Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 85 feet Lot Coverage 40 percent 32 percent Building Height Overall 30 feet 30 feet Building Height at Curb Face 10.5 feet Retaining Wall Height 4 feet max 5 feet Cut/Fill 5 feet 11.5' Feet *Grading in Excess of 5 feet Requires Planning Commission Approval Retaining Walls: The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 -feet with a minimum 3 -foot separation between the stepped walls. The project includes retaining walls up to 5 feet -2 inches. The additional retaining wall height is necessary to lower the foundation of the residence to reduce the height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera. The applicant has filed a Minor Exception request for the additional wall height. A Minor Exception permits an additional 2 feet in building height above the maximum permitted wall height. Perimeter Walls and Fencing: There is an existing combination wall and wrought iron fence along the west elevation that was constructed with the development of the single-family residence to the west. The applicant proposes an up to 4 -foot retaining wall topped by a 5 -foot wrought -iron fence along the east property line. A 6 -foot -high wrought fence is proposed along the south elevation. The proposed perimeter walls are in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E., which encourages the use of open -view fencing and having walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. Grading The proposed grading design includes 784 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 1,296 feet and the lower garage pad at an elevation of 1,285, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. Building Envelope Analysis: Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.C. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30 -foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north -south and two east -west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30 -foot height requirement. The height of the residence ranges Page 273 DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS October 15, 2019 Page 3 from approximately 10 -feet and 6 -inches, along the east side of the residence, to 6 -feet and 11 - inches, along the west side of the residence, as measured above curb face on Camino Predera. Landscape: The proposed landscaping is designed to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., including the installation of a permanent irrigation system landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is not within the High Fire Hazard Zone or within a wildland-urban interface area. The proposed landscaping also complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area. The rear yard includes slope planting to prevent erosion. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting in the Rains Room at City Hall on June 10, 2019, with approximate 20 residents in attendance. The applicant provided an overview of the project and fielded questions. The residents raised concerns related to the building height as seen from Camino Predera, the width of the residence (built to the minimum 5- and 10 - foot setbacks), and the size of the residence as compared to older homes along Camino Predera. The applicant responded that lowering the residence would steepen the driveway to the point that it would be difficult to navigate, that reducing the width of the residence would make it difficult to construct a 3 -car garage and that the size of the residence is in keeping with the existing residences most recently constructed along Camino Predera. The neighbors stated that the size of the recently constructed residences along Camino Predera is not in keeping with the intent of Hillside Design regulations and is too large compared to the older residences constructed along the street. Staff Comments Over the years, the City has received numerous concerns and complaints from neighborhood residents in response to projects along the south side of Camino Pradera. Generally, neighborhood residents have expressed concern that these projects are not compatible with the existing neighborhood. Specifically, as it relates to this development application, concerns as expressed at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, involve the height, width, and size of the proposed residence. As expressed by residents at the Neighborhood Meeting, a primary concern is that recently constructed and/or proposed residences, including the subject application, which have typically ranged from 3,500 to 5,000 square feet, are much larger and inconsistent with older residences which dominate the character of the established neighborhood and which typically range in size from 2,400 to 3,000 square feet. In addition, staff feels that the proposed project does not meet the intent of the existing Hillside Development regulations. For example, the applicant proposes to build to the minimum side setbacks of 5 and 10 feet whereas Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a explicitly discourages this and recommends increased side yard setbacks to avoid the appearance of overbuilding of lots, among other design guidelines. Regarding concerns of "compatibility," the General Plan provides qualitative language which may be applied to the subject development application. For example, Policy LU -2.4 could be interpreted to apply to this project. This General Plan policy aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." Further, the discussion section of this policy states that "The General Plan encourages the development of vacant residential lots where they are largely surrounded by other residential development to maximize efficient use of existing infrastructure and to meet housing demand. Land use controls that include development standards will ensure that infill development is compatible with neighboring uses." Page 274 DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS October 15, 2019 Page 4 While the proposed project meets the current development standards, and while the Development Code does not provide an objective definition of the term "compatibility," the proposed development requires discretionary review by the Planning Commission pursuant to Sections 17.16.140.8.1 and Section 17.122.020.G.i of the Development Code. As such, certain findings are required to be made, including a finding that a proposed project must be consistent with the General Plan (Section 17.16.140.F.1). In summary, staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend that the Planning Commission deny the subject application for the following reasons: Project Conflicts with Intent of Hillside Design Guidelines: The project proposes to build to the minimum side setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, which conflicts with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures. Project Is Incompatible with Existing Neighborhood: At 4,118 square feet, the proposed residence is significantly larger than older existing residences within the established neighborhood which range on average from approximately 2,400 to 3,000 square feet. Project is Inconsistent with General Plan: General Plan Policy LU -2.4 promotes "complementary infill development... that contributes positively to the surrounding neighborhood." As evidenced by comments received at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, and considering long-standing concerns regarding the scale of other development proposed along the south side of Camino Predera, the proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4. Notably, and in order to address long-standing concerns of neighborhood compatibility, Planning Department staff, at the request of the City Council, have initiated a separate process to reevaluate certain hillside development standards, namely building height, setbacks and grading standards. This process is ongoing as of the writing of this report. Regarding architectural concerns, and in the event that the applicant were to revise the project into a development which would be acceptable to staff, staff recommends that the applicant increase side yard setbacks and step the upper level of the residence from the lower level. Staff also recommends that additional design enhancements are needed to the side elevations of the residence to better characterize the craftsman architectural design theme. Staff recommends that wood siding used on the front and rear elevations be continued to the side elevations of the second (upper) story. Major Issues: Staff does not support the proposed project for the reasons explained above. Discuss whether the committee should recommend approval or denial of the project design to the Planning Commission. Page 275 DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS October 15, 2019 Page 5 Secondary Issues: Whether the side elevations of the 2nd (upper) story should be upgraded to include wood siding to match the front and rear elevations to provide 360 -degree architecture. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend that the Planning Commission deny the subject application. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag Staff Coordinator: David Eoff, Senior Planner Attachment: Letters of project opposition Page 276 ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ZM i,:aal1 CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER 7:00pm Roll Call: Ray Wimberly x Tony M. Guglielmo x David Eoff Alternates: Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Sean McPherson, Senior Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following Page 1 of 3 Page 277 each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00912 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2019-00205 — PHELAN DEVELOPMENT - A request to develop an 11.73 acre site with three (3) industrial/warehouse buildings totaling 236,534 square feet within the General Industrial (GI) District, located on the north side of 91" Street, west of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 91' Street — APN: 0207-262-28, 0207-262-35, 0207-262-36, 0207-262-41, and 0207-262-42. Related File: Minor Exception DRC2019-00205. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. The project was approved as presented_ The Design Review Committee's only concern was the outstanding purchase agreement with the parcel of land at the southeast corner of the project site. They recommended that the applicant clarify this issue by the time that the project is reviewed by the Planning Commission. C2. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 771 square foot garage on a 15,430 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. Related Records: Minor Exception DRC2018-00473. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The Design Review Committee moved the project forward to the full Planning Commission without recommendation. The Committee informed the applicant that they faced challenges ahead for the PC to approve a project that is opposed by residents in the surrounding area. Page 2 of 3 Page 278 D. ADJOURNMENT 8:30pm The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, October 10, 2019 at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Ifpecial assistance or accommo dations to participate in this meeting, please contact the epartment at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the a reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for impaired. Page 3 of 3 Page 279 Camino Predera Data- House Size 3912.208333 Total Average for 1980s Total Average for 1990s Address APN # Year Built or (year approved if not yet constructed) Building Permit (Combined residence, garage, porches, decks, etc) Notes 4237.666667 Southside of Camino Predera Average 3918.285714 North side of Camino Predera 7966 Camino Predera 0207-631-24 1988 3061 7978 Camino Predera 0207-631-25 1988 3061 8034 Camino Predera 0207-631-21 2007 4844 8044 Camino Predera 0207-631-22 2007 3974 8054 Camino Predera 0207-631-23 2008 5369 8062 Camino Predera 0207-641-11 2006 3734 Galvan Residence 0207-641-12 (Approved 12/18) 4950 8072 Camino Predera 0207-641-13 1987 3194 8080 Camino Predera 0207-641-14 1989 2980 8088 Camino Predera 0207-641-15 1989 3012 Predera Court cul-de-sac 8714 Predera Court 1995 6188 8715 Predera Court 0207-631-18 2007 5273 8720 Predera Court 0207-631-16 2002 3654 8721 Predera Court 0207-631-19 2002 3232 8725 Predera Court 0207-631-20 1989 3605 No bldg permit for house. County PIMS data 8728 Predera Court 0207-631-15 2003 3348 No bldg permit for house. County PIMS data 8736 Predera Court 0207-631-14 1989 2986 Southside of Camino Predera 7957 Camino Predera 0207-631-11 2004 4110 7967 Camino Predera 0207-631-10 2004 3682 7979 Camino Predera 0207-631-09 2004 3526 7997 Camino Predera 0207-631-07 2004 3975 8045 Camino Predera 0207-631-02 2008 4372 8083 Camino Predera 0207-641-03 (Approved 3/19) 3077 8089 Camino Predera 0207-641-04 (Approved 2/18) 4686 8035 Camino Predera 0207-631-03 Proposed Residence (DRC2017-00244 5263 Total Tract Average 3912.208333 Total Average for 1980s Total Average for 1990s 3128.428571 6188 Total Average for 2000s 4084.076923 Total Average for 2010s 4237.666667 Southside of Camino Predera Average 3918.285714 Page 280 OWNERS C'E�PT/F/C,4TE /t/E.�,(EPEBY C,5PT/FY 71-147 AE<1RE T,E ONLY A,4�P1/ES 110 01416 gA VY RZ_CO.,PO T/rLE //►'TE�PES! Iry T//E L4N0 _UBO/d/DED ,45SHOWN ,,;;V 11'E ANN",:0IV,4,04NO !YE (U'vs'EN! TD 17h�F P.9IF11 414q- r/ON 4N0 RE(1�RDAl/OPV Lt1�T.y/SF/N,QL M.4P4N0 f'vE.�/E.QEBY DED/C4TE T1� THE (Yll'GF R<!N(ND(L/<,4M0�1/6,4FQQ�BL/('USEO,�iM/NOP4EDEP,4,4N0 LiQEDEQ4 CaC/•4'l. FUrQlf/ER- M�?E H'E4LS0 �EREB�'OED/(��TE 1p T//E(/TYQ� QQNI�/D (L/l"4rONG.4 ,'�/E 0�4.�/N MEMS 4NL7 �f'EfIEREBY /Rf7E{V0G4BL Y OFFER TO 4E0/C,4TE T,yE OI ",4'GOHi E.4sF1VE/Vr,4ND r,4r6 0,Q,41iVQGE ELSE�lE/Vr .45 .syOwrV O/V rA/E .4/✓rYE- .4f' WE HEREBY RFSE,4t/E TO OURSEL YES, 04/R A/E/RS .41VD qSS/ G/VS CEPIA/i✓ BR/✓,4TL� A4,4/NAGE E4SEMENTS AS DEL/il'F4TE0 QN 54/D M,4P OWNERS: RANCHO ASSOCIATES, LTD., A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY: WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO., A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, ( PARTNER OF RANCHO ASSOCIATES , LTD. ) BY GEJE 0, TO SEND, ( PARTNER OF WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO.) �+ GEORG9 0. TOWNSEND �� RN.,4S5OC/4TES A C.4L/FQf1V/4 R,Q.Ql/t/ERSy/P qS ALcAEF/C/,4.QY TOA OEE,D UNDER OFEO OF T.4✓SP.4'ECp.PDEO ''�O'''� �7 /965 .4S //YST•4UMENlNF� /S- 04077 _ QEF/C'/,4L .S'EC?�2405. ..CNN M,4CKEY, NER L �J THE B = 6A .SON, 6E/Y G P4,PlNE.Q H/ ,�/COC.� BO`VM 4/VD SC'yQL',�/TER PkY7F/T S,�f�//✓G' TRUST.4S BENE - F/C/4,PY T014 DEED, UNDER' aFhEOOF7R- 4457 RE40R4!F0 ✓UL Y /O, /984,45/NSTi4C/MEM NO 6� /G2.�8/ OFF�C/qL REC2�PD5. BY E,QT B SC/� CIYTEf? TiQUSTEE MOT wY .4c,Kivowc.=~14 Nr 6TATEOFC,ALIF0RNIA ) COUNTY OF ON TH15 // r//DAY OFF�BRl_14RY )%4 MMPORE Mt, THE UNDCR&I&Nev, A NOTARY PUDLr_ IN AND FM SAID COLWTY ",0 97;77E, .+rc",O.✓,4LLY fn6bR7 B. -ZI�C117 CAM9,wN 7V Me 7V �E ,4 TRUSTEE OF Tf/E TRUST Tf/.4 T E,YECUTEO T,NE /N%T/I/N INSTRUMENT, KND`t/N TD ME TO BE I%eA61R50111 T.�/Ew/lN/N /NSTRUMENI ONBEf14GFOF /W 7W- ,6 'E/N N.4ME0 T,QUST, A/VOgC•t'N0iVLE06ED TO ME 7,-1147 SUC.-/ TRI -IS T EXEC//TED TNF I' III.!/N /N, STf�UMENT ,45 BENEF/C/, 4RY PURSUANT TO /TS 46Y44N/S agGRE5'OLUT/ON OF /TS e04/co 01__ EC,T,,,7R"5' WITNESS MY .4',9N0 ANO OfF/C/.vL sE,oL . laa6f4t.00• I NOTA.?Y AvsL/C /NA.i/0 AW fv/o coddrY,*NO AeY LOAN/SS/ON E,f'P/SES . PP haw't F t i "c T . AVM,CY ,Q'C,t�il/OK/LEA rNE/YTI` 57,4467.01- C4L/f047N/A_ COUNTTY oFLQS ,4NGtLES LvV FEBR!/gRY /ir'f' /9b5 QEFGRE /yc; Tf,�EUr✓OER. S/�,^ lD, .4 /YG. A. 4ND ,rOR .S4/0 srq!'E P�'4SGNOLLY,4�'E,4RED IY/�l Ci,4f?l' ✓•4C�S0/Y A/VO ./i�/N ,AfW'AEY RERPSD/I/,4LL y AWOA VAIN ME lc.W fi�?G/'EO TG ME avr,�/EF o5/SOF -�4T/S F,4CTORl� E{'/DENCEJ "-0,5 A1117i//N /NSl,QU/'�ENT 45 44NE 6E1VE.P4L P4,QlNE.PS O,1' BGH�JLFDF/R// .45SOC/gTEs, THE PARrNERSH/P rAERE/N 111,414jE!' ,4A;'7 4<'<'/YGI Y_' El �6� ', rG �fE Tti!Q� THE F aRrNE.�sNiPEXECI�r_ : ^ AS w/TiYEfJ' A0lrW,%V0, (R off1e1RZ�-- J�Nl fA D S of - so fso 37 IN IN CAM! �4 S NP,rAWY P!/GIL/C /N ",P IVX f,'NP ,4N0 STATE MY fOMM/SS/O.✓ EXP/REs \ �CgLLE /NOEX AND 11/CA117 Y I x.40 /"r 200' Page 281 x(100 xvqAlw SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS TRACT NQ 10035 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BEING A _"XJWIVIGION OF A FoKrION OF LOT5 7 AND 13, RED H ILL WI3D)VI510N AS PER MAP RE-C,0R 0 1N 600K 21, PAGe'93 OF MA,P5 AND LOT 10, TRACT N9-30(,9 AS PER MAP RMOROED IN 1500K 42 PAC,, --5 CA')AND70OFM,4,05,414 RECORDS 01_Tf1E CGY/NTY ac 541V SAWFar C4L/FORN/.4. CiEOROE H /►I/M lW C•" MAY 1981 CONSUL T/NG CIVIL ENG/NEER_ ONTAR/O, CAL /XC-D�'N/,4 LwN6INECR'S CERTIFICATE T 6E0/4GE.q 1,1/A1 MACK, HEREdY ceRTiFY THAT I AM A Re&IsrERED GIWL ENGINEER OF THC STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THAT TH15 MAP CON51STI NG OP TWP-E. 5HECT5 15 A TRUC AND GOMPLC'TE RtPRE5CNTATI0N OF A 5URVEY MADE UNDtR MY 51.1r'ERV1510N IN QCT. /984 , AND THAT ALL 1416NUMENT5 SHOWN HEREON ARE OF THe CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE rC?',ITION5 INDICATED, OR WILL Oe SST I N SUGH R�-�pI TI ON5 ON OR COMPLIANCE W I TH BECT I ON g (W,413 cj AND G449(o Or THE SUbDIVISON MAPACT AND ARE OR WILL DE SUFFICIENT TOCNADLE TIAESURVE`( TO DC RCTRACCD.�'L - DW IDD F e, 6. 81 r SIB 5 � � W, REGWS,?VR.EV tVIL . CITY eN&NEERt3 GERTIFiGATE I HCRCErY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE MAP, AND THAT THE 5U5DIV1510N SHOWN THEREON 10 SIJD'3TANTIALLY -HE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVC MAP AND ANY ArrROVED ALTCRATION5 THEREON AND THAT ALL THE rROVI5lON5 OF THE 9UCDIV1510N MAP' ACT AND T�/EC/,Tr' LC 1)Y. /✓;;t+ErS �� �.�y4s' /Ty Or"k.±NC/✓0 OATCD: by: LL GJ CNGI N CCR CITY MANNINCs COMMISSION'S CEjtTtFiGATE /N=rs�t�y !=h', �';i✓.;,',;'r SUB��.6:.:/-%N,:;47/vNON,'f✓E./ivlV S,W-5✓B.Srq/V- T/a� CC; yr"%?/►1. �, ti :: !Y/i:y , r1= 'iv/; 9T/G = , �1:IF' 4f�'i ✓I� y �� .�1, A. ">: i �, G JFINc OG 1,, ,0 C'i hM.,�•5, i 1 2� , %�_ . ;i /� JFi•�,.r� ►'C r/ � C ✓Gf%/tiE^NG.a C (i�'i.1/tY 7r : 5,4/ v .��i�/4:.�r?vi�vG sr,4lE 25 lir J.�c TM t%.;/ cw-' hikRC /i� DATED / - ' -22— ✓lJi SEC/,'Er.4rc r, r �.4n„ ✓., vGC� �%, �,/.�:5/JN SIGNATURE.` OMISSIONS THE SIGNATURE OF ISIAS W. WILLMAN, THe RECORD OWNER OF THE CASEMENT YOR POLELIN" AND INCIDENTAL PU,PPOlG`S A9 GRANTED DY IN6TRJMCNT RECORDED IN 80OK K, PAGE e25) OF DVe09 HAS LEEN OMITTtO PURSUANT TO THe PROVISIONS Or 5EGTION G443(i (C), (/) OF Tir/E IU�O/I//S/Oi✓il/APACT. /7S INTEREST CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE. 5AID EASEMENT CANNOT Oe i-OCATED OF RECORD THE SIGNATLIRC OF ONTARIO POWER COMPANY THE RtCAO ZD OWNER OF THt EA5EMENT FOR PGl E_INE5 AND FNCIDENTAL PJR t>5e5 A5 GRANTED Cr( IN5TRJMENT RCCORDCO APRIL I1, IW5 IN 500K 359, F*&C 3) OF DEEDS HA5 BEEN OMITt-ED PJRSUANT TO THE PROVIETION15OF 5C :TION (.i.43c, (C),(/) Of7Jl/E SUBDIVISION MAP ACT rT5 INTEREST CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE. SAID EAC C-MbNT CANNOT- DE L.00ATCD OF RECORD. THE 51C4dATLJRe OP THE CJCAMONGA IN VESTMENT COMPANY AND THE CaJCAMONGA WATERCOMPANY THE RC -CORD OWNeR OF THE EASEMCNT FOR FOE LINtE AND INCIDENTAL PUPJ"09E9 A5 CPRANTCD CY INl5TRUMENT RECORDCD OCTOCCR 5, 1925 IN OOOk 804, PAGE; 280 OF DeeV5 HAS bt1=N OMITTED PURSUANT TOTHE PROVISIONS OF SM TION GG43C. (C), (1/,4'.3J OF7WF J7//0/i'm-owAzwoACT. /,,y /.VTG.PEST4w✓wr RIPEN INTO A PEE. SAID CASC'MBNT CANNOT M LOCATCD OF KCGORD. THE S1"ATJRE OF THE .9OJTNERN CALIFORNIA sD190N COMPANY RECORD OWNER OF THE EASCM15♦4 - FOR POLU✓ L.INE5 AND INCIDENTAL PORr09C5 A5 &RANTeP 15Y IN5TRJMBNT RI5t.0RDC0 IN 500K 20&'), ^&e 153, OFFICIAL RECORDS HAS 6E.EN 0NI'nT;V PURSUW'r TO TI+E PROVISIONS OF 5CGTION Cdi404' 6�)' (/% OF THE 5U501 VISION MAP ACT. IT5 INTEREST CANNOT RIr&N INTO FCC RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATE I HEREDY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNGL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, VYA MOTION DULY 5E-CONDCD AND P/USIFD, AFrROVED TNt ATT-ACHIED MAP ON THt�Q DAYOF MARCH , M&L AND ACCtrTED POR rUDLIC USE THE THEREIN OPFCRtD, ANO I ti(E.FESY .0tC'EoT ON A;5lA6.c OF T,NE' G/TY Of ZRAI.C/✓O C!/QOMON6.q TJKB 5m~ Aiw/N E.PSEMElvr' sL/f /PE✓ECT Tf✓E 411 E" 401c*41E10/C,4T/0N. Li07L�0 / y� E /T «GC cirY a- "wvcvo caO'fA4x~ (T/TLE) AUOITOR'S C6RTIFICATt I HCRCDY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RCGORQ50F T141S OrFIGC A43 OF THIS DATE TmeAe ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE REAL r1E0MKTY SHOWN UrON THE ANNEXED MAP FOR UNPAID -3TKM c'0UNTY, MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXb+ OR SPECIAL A"1555MENT7 ^� LECTCD AS TAXES. OZ rT TAM* GR WWA,L AOW.;-r CNT5 NOT YET rAYAOLG, FcnMATED Tib 8C * G' va DD DATtA7 1 ERROL J. MACKZUM, COUNTY AUDITOR COUNTY OF SAN MO"RDINO, CAU FORK IA O`Y' , o�FIfTY WARD OF SUMItVI'5OR5 CeRTl1FICATI< I WFRr-DY GCQTIrY THAT A EOJO IN THC eUM Or #!! OW- 0406 WI!*J CCC4nt,D ANO rILLD VAN TW, 60NIV OP 6UPCRV150R5 OP T4E. COUNTY Or SW 4XRNAKDIND, U'TATC Or G►LArORNIAI, C4NDtT10NCD umw TUC rAYMGIT OF ALL TAX156, STATE., COUNT`(, MUNICIPAL CK LWAA-, AW ALL 6119W04- A 6 %w -N%, WLL,I!CfW A& Ti1�Mi MMIC!! AT 'THE TIME. OF THE MLING OF Tife ANNCXCD MAP WITH TMC COUNTY RGGGRM ARC A Lrik A"WiT MOD FRDPGRTY, CUT NOT YET PAYAtIZ AND THAT THC O0001VIOCR HAh PILED WITH MG A CtMMMCATC Off THD F010M R OFrIGeK 6IIVINC4 1419 ESTIMATE OF THE AMOUNT OF !>AIO lXft AND A46155i8MG M, ANO TUMID- eaw ~ OJ JULY ArmoveD by SAID Damp Or LIUrCRVI 5 / I / DATE. M.4RTf/q M. SEk'ERq,I' CLE,P,� CJS T.yE Bt24RD OFSUP64✓/Sl;�s, QOTf,/E CGY/NTY G�'.Si4NBE.�PN.4,tP0/iV0 %NE 67/61V47URE L<<,45sOC/,4TE0 TELEOfrONE COMPANY OWNERS OF 4N E.4 MENt FGi4 rELEO,vOr1i� L/NES RECORDED ON JULY /7, /947 /N BGOA' 20G B, P,4GE "7 OR /TS //YTEREST (4/YrVOT R/PEN INTO 4 FEE. TWE 516/14TURE DF SxiT,w/ERN C4L 11' rIRN/,4 ED/SON CD1yP,41VY T,(/E.?ECORO 0/'t'N.6QO1_.41VEASE 1MfN7FGi4 ECECTR/C L/NES CIV MgfCf/ 6, /9(1•? INBGt2K "4.4- 10,4GE//7 O.R Lor �ryvk%✓ :�,'+r :, ::' i� F, .�l,rC/ : ,'j ,; .� T�'/EP•4EC.'SE •SES/G�t'.4,�1 �� PLgC'EME�vT DF,4LL STR!/C;T;/.PES :i/V qLL LGA `V/Ty/N TH.'S SU&771)"5/0,41 s�I,4LL BE •�/B./ECr.'G /40/?4�.'s4� pl .-- E, �. S'E. . COMMITTEE OF T,�/E Ci �Y OF R,4iVcs/D Cl/<,DM� vG,4 Bf?�Q4' r0 lyE /S.SL/,4/►�'E OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ON THIS THE 6 TH DAY OF MARCH, 1985, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONA,LY APPEARED GEORGE 0. TOWNSEND PERSONA! LY KNOWN TO ME TO BE ONE OF THE PARTNERS OF WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO., A PARTNERSHIP, SAID PARTNERSHIP BEING KNOWN TO ME TO BE ONE OF THE PARTNERS OF RANCHO ASSOCIATES, LTD., A PARTNERSHIP, THE PARTNERSHIP THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME AS PARTNER OF THE PARTNERSHIP FIRST ABOVE NAMED, THAT SAID PARTNERSHIP FIRST ABOVE NAMED EXECUTED THE SAME AS A PARTNER OF RANCHO ASSOCIATES, LTD., AND THAT SAID NAMED PARTNERSHIP EXECUTED THE SAME, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. (��'rC:aetiL S ' CA""6 A. ;'A " INP G n n S,x NOTARY PUBLIC I c A 174/3 3 x35 TRACT N0. 10035 IM THE C/TY OF RAV490 Cl144MONGA, C41./FORKAR AE/N6 A fb60/1//f/OPV Of A PORT/ON OF L,OTf 7.4W.0 /., REO 11144 tL/QO/l//.f/OA/ Af I A' /1/AP ,PECAQOEO /A/ SwAo, Z/, PA6E if OF MAPS ,oww LOT m,, mwCT A/0..f046P Af /f,P MOO RE60ROf0 /.t/ ,&Mlle 4ZIPf6Ef G' �fWP 70 OFM,4PS 4LL, RECORDS Gig r,4156E C2�UrvlY OF S4/V BER/V.4/?O/VO, SlgTEO�CgL/FOR/V/.4. Fo ,,. rCS 0..�,�......_..........._.. - ........""•• GEORGE 17e SCALE : /"'-Lo' MAY, ifs/ A '• /rL0/' ,g•/•S'/,Z ENULT/NGCv/cNG iNEEPCOS GS3/��nONTAR/0, C4L/r GR/V/.46f RED ALL io COLIA, se �"w 71/1 41 • fS7.i�L/r,✓�`O Ar MW W Z Y AMW400WY L/iV'6 ,,pp : • h Of M. A ® yD �,5'EASEMENT TO 45SOG/4TEp TELEAr/ONE CO. V Q� �1 �i �^� •� FOR POLE L/NES PER L1EE0 RECQ4LiE"D /NBK n Z04d, P6.997 QR oa !1 :' L073� s�iG ��� LO•� Al 7f01% �yi T� \ er7A* f6/I,VEOA.f Me .S• EY.Y !Ar/NOA,PY OF L073• �/ 5 G/ •L6 Z�T 1b !, v 7,Y,i�T �✓O..f06f, A/.Q. <Z1-6 70 •. o� co EiOft��t11. IN F.v /I M 7iD/L /O - " f0. Z /.P. T,Q66E0 L.f.3A7Z. ,vo,r ,v«Eireo E ,tea T,f iiss,tf4fqa/Ts7�t ..,_..... 1 -3.�� mor �o� urr cfT.....,, a b 75•Z,( s!"E. 44f.19' 1zft' 7Z.QG' �/ Z695?7' I (Z70.00' 4Z/G9-76 / l/y'0 0 i"" 7.Rl6E0.7C.!/,it!",IT..-•••' 9G. �; � /Sf.7 � —; -.fQ 3.d 10.04,$!5 t7`�4 �► � po ' `� !AY et. fora Aw 7X. JV47 a '� �8• - l 3� e_ AdE 4W/4f-,V CftUj ,VI b.�� �ppl' \� j k ms' Zoo e .� � N72/029rV-� z - a aa.r�„ SVA I / �4t-Sly-` l y: o �y �a 4.150' NlrO/S2L'E w "N07'd741A � v5 / AG n` \4'ES14fro AS -W /V.4TE S S� `"` .—��" - '° \ PRrE DRe61� <ESM710 AW - O�M� rel. CO. FOR POLE Z- oRai Kpo'�ESMI.TEC. CO. G� Jf L/NES PER Z EEO Z� fo. Hi'io 7MW Ys/Ar `a \ f� `" EDR RALE L/NEe AEC: /Nat' 2148" 21 f 9q c- (� /,rr sf dK Zffl,' /16r s.►�iss v 0 N FE,P GEEO SPEC. //v�o oO6 3337 O.R. .1 /,� % AIA 41444Y. AF t•/�sii d 0 : BK. 8 337 0 r, (SEEL 7 3 �(: i �/ ..� r � a f =zas''-- �, h o l7 OR is/. •� \5' �, 1�� toa �' o S ����G ���; o to ,fib �� ,'' !'tayo''r-` o, �`0iti:i3+ 4� V 5b 9 oc \ \ 4`� �t I •S i �I A ♦i ,��3• s 1 • ,O figAso y� [ 1'D• 1'4'9 "'�_ `^.,•` `�iu mai/Q �LDINCa bCTD�G•K LINt .j _X 7 54/V D/%O /� , D ,/`•, 0 p0)�- 'Q moo- = S• czZa7t' Ga a,/1 R� Q Q� Qti $ �� is /6•;7%1" T .Vfl' 11 Mw i P A �' r L• C� � '� Q� � � •!"�• ti �.{�. L=svj' 6rsf' fzsi' t�s6.11l1 l ` ��.. �. . o r. S. 76 /s s9 w. /sawn 171? N G �• \ $ l c� eo�0 `. ��, \�i. c C% •'''O. �i?moi d=/7•o/�0" ,t•�oo' �i• �'„�ji, � :Z+ ,�r°% �., r�7o' x•17' A ,�,Z ' 1~ �z"w. Nu 5 Af •27 5" G/.lo' fG.ii' yla9 �. 9 m o IL 10 q k• � b� N V. • v wi. -fa. L r. / nom, :�►E. 7i+�s " �� 3ti \?P w ti y� o H . p 2' 41B A 1� ire.�ee/rJ .._.... h hZ \ `� •oI'f Ih ` \ �� Gir ��'►�//�tjo~p, 70L1E0/GATE 4N a►\ ,� 10 ,vim'` EASEMENT •�� � j•�4i��i. � ?r Q4 FGi4 AP4//✓•46E \t \ IlAf ~29, C5f ADl.15NM@JT NOW GN LOT 15, MW NII.L � •s'S p�•h, N � \I 1 wgavwcN NoIw ieNT Nor R'JIAJO. UOC� ���. �,�� B�•S•�• I Plx Wv N+u �Jlly+ '.1ANioDrt, µD z►RZKatO ANStc40 �ti��'�o� �C N v� ss �� •?car• MYI.AR COPY R D=OrO�J'Oo" La N•w' fo. 4e"110' i"i. Azs',Vif1ZY.................... f�P4M ¢ ,fA/ PE,P ' bCr I vz , b • a5' N w'L-�f or 4L IWCAeb, LAW FOR LIW_ ONLY Page 282 ---m 7 --ft �?Op� 0oio. per, r - p• d16'c�o• . R• O 72.40'"' ��` L• 3b.cn• . or #vp ,Z� 015 oRv Em 4 VAR/ES W/7141L0C,4r/ON Copp ,r\ °' 4',64 EME/Y! 70 '. __ ,30 FEET /N ASSOC/4TEO TEC. / , �LEN6TN > .. "fo. Z"/P. sET /N elme.. Co. ICW RALEL/NES e G " &PAWW., ACGC,PrW A5 6N/ PER OEEO REG. /N MOLD VriON Of ZYrMMr BK ea:B, R6 337Uq G/NE cr' Lflr 7, A4.6 2//33 �r�dsHJ 50 CAL. EO/SON PER //VSTRUMENT U ,*-M0RDEO 7/2//47 /NSm,r ax'q' x;G./S.3 TYR/CAL EA SENENT OEM /L /'/ ` ` O ' R S!/EE T 2 OF i fiVEETs a r• -SO. C,i'�lJi. Ci�/lO,V CD. 6p1'E frVT AW hWM22'1 WN7; AW 7 /47 IW Ar 104P, oV. A�n'. MJ O� DE;rl4/L "A" i/0 SCgL E Sc#10 : /"=60' MMES: c nv.- ,ems Amma of msT.os svpw,v FOR me S'LY f&wWAffY L/MC OF 7, Wr NO. 47-17, M.B. BS/S03/ AVIW L/IEO Af Me AfWlf OF SE•O�P/A/6f "ViC Ti�//,S' "IV. Z. • MONL1,veV7X f0!/NOAf NOMP. j, o /w0/,-,47rS /"l P. ApGE. 9399, zwzeof 407AC,9fW1!re MPMW SMS ,CeVXr M" AMAWWR AYAC77W EN61MMeN6 4V,0!/4JWh'$, OAr,-,V A1116df7 Z7, /SBO, AY APl/lE A PA4Z"R , Xe7e.. /"P/. f Tl//S M.Wr AW 38 ZOrf, AMO /5.725 AZ.lLS 4. vile. /ND/C,gTES Az/At/C' UT/L/TY 6wFAfEMT. 7 C.S.M. /NO/C.VMf eWIV7Y f!/WWYOAS' /A;.NZ1A0'4 VT.- 7 CSAA f /NO/447Ef OO!/NTY tel"4EYO, 5r f/ELO A40W. 9 jz AYD/,ATEs /" /.P. SET //4"EELO/(/ Sd,PFrQIE, N//TJi/ T/ES, 7WS6Eo ,fee 9399. ' /D. x /MO/44TES G "Aafr SET /'W /. M. AMO /VAr"of, W17w r/", T,v"Eo 'rc. E. 93 Qp /,✓o/C,v715 1"/. P .sET lfLl/fiVJ *Wp 9399. /t. ( ) A. -MRO AW70 (Ag NOM -D) /3. CC.`!/O. /ND/C4rES C444HaV64 COUNTY WAr_-R O/STV/Cr 74?/3 -er / 0 W h TRACT NO,, 10035 #1 rMs C/TY w /sAaIWO �Y/C�QMON6A, CAL IFMM1,A ro.1'c.s.M. � "IM46 RI .f!/t6%I//.S'/ON OF .4 ,q 710A/ OF LOTS 7 AMP /j, .PED 1//LL SU60////S/O,t/ c•tflb' 273/5-7'' �Rf �,! AIAP �Es�O/POEO /N A00,� I/, R�6E j3 Of A4RlPS, .4N0 LOT /O, T,i�R7CT 1► OOUNTRY 4LU6 AP JW6-v AT /E.q MAR-AFMROEO /N 804,(' ¢Z, P�OGES `9 .giVO 70, 0,rAMPS � p N y L �o� ��VE o .ALL AMOR405 Qr TMf C4V1W7Y 04CS4N �E.P/1�4/�O/NO, STAlE A�C,DL /PORN/•4 . R / � � «, GEORGE NA04fAMC/�— GLvT4R/Q CWZ1,r RN/.4 ,S�G NSA G5 G \ 39 s op y2 CAPER. f �0 •� � s z►I , . �' � E N FOR rtD � pls�����. � E�Ev\;•. , `°�', EASE \ .30'�pdsf��� Pd ld1Ey �� �E��Str/ JI �. ' , 8 • � ,1 t0 / F 00 00 � 0 A11.1 E4�EMEN/ rc.= `y 1. rkk too E 4 OI I; Jo rr�.aEs �s�c 1 �, �Q� •g, fE 4 d• ; 2�' �' Z a ti. JLr4/L J \ 0w o\�p1�331 py`� , r�� 5•x'1 4 , ` p RFr 2? /` r �r e (,'EASEMENT f0_� j 50&,rivE9N \ Ate` d'bl s A0 A"Z-A4Vf,, N07AW � �y1R �A �9 moi. � � M1j .004E L NO 10661., $9' 9G- 28 `? �/ 5, 1174, \ °b �► fo. /"ilr 7,4�Eo'v.s2srf" �i uc�w iorav - I. �._, &0v¢s'/iz3'E p��s'000za'r" NO 10666, A�C'CE/TE/ 1016106., ) 31 Z/.57 n, �O '40 t�• Iia Pf [07s f f i t �` -� ,'�' 31' PR/d4TE .i- �s� , ' �. o .10 .a, oma► /YI/SN) ,�• h 1 1 4'� M* s3. d o R:SZ.< r,. �'[ ¢ag�' �\ 0RR,4lV,46E 0 !�''� j9" k0� �d `b`�s_ a.�Z t7 •.¢�' a ESMT qo. mow.• \b \ ✓%p ,\ IV. a.); t .• �-14 f0 71 S 5 4 \ 1 .o<'ESMr7045SOC/,4TED yfo p A55 I 7EL. Coo. FOR GE L/NES Ittµ, t/�10 '�v 5�1• �E� ��p�R �j /B v ;� \,� \ ` r • PER DEED RE IN A6J'r Z V /N b p 5 gK Seg• �, \ • 2C1:B,R5 937 GZR\� IAlEE SIN SND Rsa.r/'. p R 33 P6. w j 9. �u✓,) . I j /s s o W OC .x°09° �� s �r•yco"w. /vz:c' Q0 / o �4 H pQ tir.�3 ^ gtl.l�Q /Q W. '� \ i b h bu1L(71Wx •� L * itlS� ''[ V �4 =//5' Z4f °ttj 7"- Z/. f1 ti 15' �L �Z. dS' \ .\ �� r e=/•rlsa•' LINE ; I �1 r=risz' 0 w � [ • tx �e • ZI;., ♦oso' L=iao�' i L =rte sG' T=/s...n' �O dz'_/ ? o \ 4.1.�•S?• C • %. ' Rs/i!O' L � /6 •/!/.K' T•!f�/' S.GZ•/7l9"AV /G/.f0 L ZISL' Q /9zG` !S6' �dL 27.70' D S-il•/7'If"M! 4 {S fZ �„ 4B� Mv�d \ 4\ / vL °_ •sry " M !� r. ��o`;, ssz•�7>:s"w. r-ssoi' _ soG.so \ � � f 3i'15 ti•(!� _ S `Z•/7' ..� �?tp s. � � \� /.Yid �- � +� r•y` ` w R = L f /isso' _7-1- 740' -AA9 L ZOB.36'zz ' ,p�/100 d.f1•/7:/ N! Z77. � "i _ _ _ o d°a<'�l•,�•�5.lL�'i5�_ ,/`• i(://10' L•/I//f'fsz•/7'1Z.,�, L•ii' \ 7,/ /Itdl�?7l.ZO' S7.ss' d=d �� /��•' R+tee'}" �� ' xter�K u,''r //2.LG' . Q ft / d r I.55'Is' GI.IZ' z N dL' B2. iG' • L • to./1' n IRS' [ = r \ z N •� Ni L:77a ---� • yam` ��� %% o ' 4r I � � t• o _ a. O -� `" ►. � H h .�. stir,, '�'+ L s S•jl 1 3a ' �Q 1,^ qlV �h Qb H •OLS 0� \ell �•`�3`�- V r/�L=Z/3.ie. f•IZ I tl�1 •�,�4Za �9/41 /7 d•tt•SGWl'It �o6oj Ilk do 17 0 1/ 0 41 V • V RrZIOft LrIy9 Zr aOOf, e=/•/Zs�" 3'N L=�R75' L=Gw.!/' ___ /. G.6f BOA/' BQO/' 5100' Ef.On' 1' /.iZGi7' " ,Ili Vi � W 4141 •/9'/3"E. aro t700 .frl7S'99_75_—tom -—�,4*D'o900".Q=// Y9./'' ••••&5-meL/lNEO As 7wdr A!N/'LY [/NE OF AA17,11"N AVezos/G /fV/Z~,p /fMA17" Of L = ZXf,I' 7, /x.76 b ' b 1 � Il�2864.�3' t -'x61.51' �Q: � �� I� 1. A217.451 M/ T ' /�•JZ' fW1Z,FWP QldWr 4f. Ip/ A•O'27'G0' YJR 4' h � -co,�' ; t", i 1010 - N. �/ •/9'/d ' E. G,eb .4/ " - �� cc, L4 R104/LS AW -S'. ArIW AV X/99 649LE : /~=GO MYLAR COPY Page 283 SHEET -5 OF S SHMT5 Ile oil PR/VATE DRQ/NAGE EASEMENT �� w � l 27 26 ZIET4/L 5,raRN ORWA/ EASEMENT SCALE•' /1FI40 f0. it T. Def r,P. 4777 S/ SO -S/ \F� o41q,,, I✓ S. T /6106 1X 46"76 'EASEME/VT TO S.C.E. CO. M. a es/so;�/ FQR POLE L/NES PER S&r \�ti If 20.00 \\ SZGS, E6. //7 O.R. OF,Q4NC/,/O COC41VO14164 FLA? D` 10", /\1z1 `\ \ G6T4/CON ROPE/4Ty 9 / 40' ,o ��,e�°\ \ LOT 5, RED HILI_ Tom\ \ / SUBDIVISION, M.B. 21/33 ..- 4sw AMP .............FO. /yi"/.R 7A66E0 "L.SIISZ" 4-y ACCEPTED .ew sLY Co,P. fV,4 2� \f.Q' T� G 717, M.S. /S/ f0-fY A90 O 1bo35 ` l EASEMENT TO C/1YOF,4,4N1ND C&C4WON6.4 AW STORNOR..4/N ZIET4/L 5,raRN ORWA/ EASEMENT SCALE•' /1FI40 f0. it T. Def r,P. 4777 S/ SO -S/ \F� o41q,,, I✓ S. T /6106 1X 46"76 'EASEME/VT TO S.C.E. CO. M. a es/so;�/ FQR POLE L/NES PER S&r \�ti If 20.00 \\ SZGS, E6. //7 O.R. OF,Q4NC/,/O COC41VO14164 FLA? D` 10", /\1z1 `\ \ G6T4/CON ROPE/4Ty 9 / 40' ,o ��,e�°\ \ LOT 5, RED HILI_ Tom\ \ / SUBDIVISION, M.B. 21/33 ..- 4sw AMP .............FO. /yi"/.R 7A66E0 "L.SIISZ" 4-y ACCEPTED .ew sLY Co,P. fV,4 2� \f.Q' T� G 717, M.S. /S/ f0-fY A90 O 1bo35 DATE: December 11, 2019 STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2017-00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 771 square foot garage and a request to construct retaining walls up to 5 -feet and 2 -inches high on a 15,430 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 through the adoption of the attached resolutions of denial. PROJECT REVIEW BACKGROUND: Hillside Development Review DRC2018-00473 and minor exception on DRC2018-00473 was reviewed by the Planning Commission at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting. At that meeting, staff presented an overview of the project, the applicant responded to staff comments and the public was provided time to comment on the project. The Planning Commission closed said meeting, deliberated and voted 5-0 to have staff draft resolution of denial for the subject entitlements for their action at the next Planning Commission meeting. ANALYSIS: A detailed description and analysis of the project has been provided in the Staff Report that was presented to Planning Commission on November 13, 2019. Page 284 RESOLUTION NO. 19-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2017-00244 - A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 4,118 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 771 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE ON A 15,430 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 8035 CAMINO PREDERA; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals. 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Hillside Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted this Resolution denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the all available evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on December 11, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot, two-story single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 285 Land Use General Plan Zoning Low (L) Residential District Site Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District North Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District Page 285 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-75 HDR DRC2017-00244— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 2 South Pacific Electric Trail Public Mixed -Use (MU) District East Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District West Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District C. While the proposed project generally conforms to the minimum development requirements of the Hillside Design Standards, the Planning Commission finds that the project is not in character with the surrounding neighborhood and existing residences along Camino Predera for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. For the foregoing reasons, the Planning Commission finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the Planning Commission finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." The Planning Commission expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape therefore establishing an adverse precedent. As a result, the Planning Commission finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. 3. General Plan Compatibility: The Planning Commission finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family Page 286 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-75 HDR DRC2017-00244— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 3 homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. In addition, the Planning Commission recognizes the comments received from neighborhood residents that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's small single-family homes. Such comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. The Planning Commission finds that the increasing growth in average house size, including the proposed project, correlates to the neighborhood concerns about maintaining the neighborhood's character and its negative impact on development that contributes positively to the neighborhood. 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Commission herebyfinds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is inconsistent with the General Plan, specifically General Plan Policy LU -2.4. The General Plan encourages complementary infill development (General Plan Policy LU -2.4). The proposed residence is not complementary to the surrounding development as it is significantly larger than the other residences in Tract 10035. At 4,889 square feet include living and garage area, it is 977 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 (3,912 square feet) and provides side yard setbacks that are not compatible with the Hillside Development Ordinance. b. The proposed use is not in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project is not in accord with the objectives of Section 17.122.020 (Hillside Development) of the Development Code which states that the hillside design standards and guidelines are intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The proposed single-family residence is incompatible with the other single-family residences as it significantly larger (977 square feet) than the existing and approved residences in Tract 10035 and is proposed at the minimum side yard setbacks (5 and 10 feet) in conflict Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures. In addition, the project does not conform to the maximum height restriction for retaining walls in the Hillside Overlay Zone. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. In this case, the project proposes retaining walls of up to five feet, two inches in height. By separate resolution, the Planning Commission has denied a proposed minor exception to permit the additional retaining wall height above the height limit permitting by the Development Code. Accordingly, the project does not comply with the retaining wall height limit in the Development Code. C. The proposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project is not in accord with the Development Code as the project site is located within the Hillside Overlay District which was intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The project proposes to construct a single-family residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, in conflict with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures, etc. The existing residence to the west is also constructed at the minimum side yard setback, increasing the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the Page 287 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-75 HDR DRC2017-00244— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 4 vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth above, and all of the evidence in the record, this Commission hereby denies Hillside Development Review DRC2017-00244 and the project proposed by the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF December 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA An ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of December 2019, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 288 RESOLUTION NO. 19-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 - A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS UP TO 5 -FEET AND 2 -INCHES HIGH FOR A 4,118 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 771 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE ON A 15,430 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 8035 CAMINO PREDERA; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals. 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2018-00473, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted this Resolution denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon all available evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on December 11, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot, three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and b. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height within the Hillside Overlay Zone, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. C. The application is for a Minor Exception (DRC2018-00473) to permit the project's proposed retaining walls to be over the 4 foot maximum height limit (five feet, two inches proposed). The project site is within the Hillside Overlay Zone. Page 289 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-76 HDR DRC2018-00473— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 2 d. The Planning Commission makes the following findings in support of its decision to deny the application: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. For the foregoing reasons, the Planning Commission finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the Planning Commission finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." The Planning Commission expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape therefore establishing an adverse precedent. As a result, the Planning Commission finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. General Plan Compatibility: The Planning Commission finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. In addition, the Planning Commission recognizes the comments received from neighborhood residents that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's small single-family homes. Such comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. The Planning Commission finds that the increasing growth in average house size, including the proposed project, correlates to the neighborhood concerns about maintaining the Page 290 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-76 HDR DRC2018-00473— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 3 neighborhood's character and its negative impact on development that contributes positivelyto the neighborhood. 3. Based upon all available evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is not consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed Minor Exception to permit additional retaining wall height is not consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan encourages complementary infill development (General Plan Policy LU-2.4). The related design review (DRC2017-00244) is fora 4,118 square foot single -family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average house size within Tract 10035 (based on the existing and approved residences within the Tract 10035). The proposed building size along with the proposed building setbacks creates the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. b. The proposed development is not compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. For the reasons stated above, the proposed single -family residence is not compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area as it is significantly larger than the other residences in the same tract (Tract 10035) and is proposed to be constructed at the minimum side yard setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding the lot and increasing the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is not necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The necessity for retaining walls above the height limit can be mitigated by reducing the size of the proposed residence and by increasing the side yard setbacks. d. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege as the additional retaining wall height is related to a proposed single -family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks. The City has been contacted by property owners in the surrounding neighborhood who are opposed to the project based on the size of the proposed residence, the height of the residence above curb face on Camino Predera and the width of the project (built at minimum setbacks). 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth above, and all of the evidence in the record, this Commission hereby denies Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 and the project proposed by the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 291 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-76 HDR DRC2018-00473— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF December 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1W ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of December 2019, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 292 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEAL DRC2019-00975 AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2017-00244; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Hillside Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 19.75 denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. On December 19, 2019, the applicant, Bardos Construction, Inc., filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application. 5. On the 19th day of February 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the appeal, concluded said hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application and making findings in support thereof. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the all available evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on February 19, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot, two-story single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations forthe project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 293 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. February 19, 2020 Page 2 C. The proposed project does not conform to the minimum development requirements of the Development Code and Hillside Design Standards because it does not conform to the retaining wall height limit applicable to the project. Concurrent with this Resolution, the City Council is also adopting a Resolution to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny a minor exception for retaining wall height. The City Council also finds that the project is not in character with the surrounding neighborhood and existing residences along Camino Predera for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. This means that the project is approximately 1,351 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 and 1,345 square feet larger than the average residence on the south side of Camino Predera. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and street and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the City Council finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." At the November 13, 2019, Page 294 Land Use General Plan Zoning Low (L) Residential District Site Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District North Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District South Pacific Electric Trail Public Mixed -Use (MU) District East Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District West Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District C. The proposed project does not conform to the minimum development requirements of the Development Code and Hillside Design Standards because it does not conform to the retaining wall height limit applicable to the project. Concurrent with this Resolution, the City Council is also adopting a Resolution to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny a minor exception for retaining wall height. The City Council also finds that the project is not in character with the surrounding neighborhood and existing residences along Camino Predera for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. This means that the project is approximately 1,351 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 and 1,345 square feet larger than the average residence on the south side of Camino Predera. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and street and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the City Council finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." At the November 13, 2019, Page 294 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. February 19, 2020 Page 3 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape therefore establishing an adverse precedent. The City Council has independently reviewed the record and concurs with the Planning Commission's findings and concerns. As a result, the City Council finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. 3. General Plan Compatibility: The City Council finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. The Planning Commission, at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting, received public comments that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's smaller single-family homes. Similar comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is inconsistent with the General Plan, specifically General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which encourages complementary infill development. The proposed residence is not complementary to the surrounding development as it is significantly largerthan the other residences in Tract 10035. At 4,889 square feet include living and garage area, it is 977 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 (3,912 square feet) and provides side yard setbacks that are not compatible with the Hillside Development Ordinance which encourages increase setback to avoid the appearance of overbuilding and crowding of structures b. The proposed use is not in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project is not in accord with the objectives of Section 17.122.020 (Hillside Development) of the Development Code which states that the hillside design standards and guidelines are intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The proposed single-family residence is incompatible with the other single-family residences as it significantly larger (977 square feet) than the existing and approved residences in Tract 10035 and is proposed at the minimum side yard setbacks (5 and 10 feet) in conflict Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures. In addition, the project does not conform to the maximum height restriction for retaining walls in the Hillside Overlay Zone. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. In this case, the project proposes retaining walls of up to five feet, two inches in height. By separate resolution, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission's decision to deny the proposed minor exception to permit the additional Page 295 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. February 19, 2020 Page 4 retaining wall height above the height limit permitting by the Development Code. Accordingly, the project does not comply with the retaining wall height limit in the Development Code. C. The proposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project is not in accord with the Development Code as the project site is located within the Hillside Overlay District which was intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The project proposes to construct a single-family residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, in conflict with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures, etc. The existing residence to the west is also constructed at the minimum side yard setback, increasing the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision DRC2019-00975, and upholds the Planning Commission's decision denying Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to the appellants that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, to Mr. Paul Bardos, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of February 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Page 296 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20-XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. February 19, 2020 Page 5 ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dated: JANICE C. REYNOLDS, City Clerk Page 297 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEAL DRC2019-00975 AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals. 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2018-00473, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11 th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 19.76 denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. On December 19-2019, the applicant, Bardos Construction, Inc., filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application. 5. On the 19th day of February 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the appeal, concluded said hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application and making findings in support thereof. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon all available evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on February 19, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot, three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and b. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height within the Hillside Overlay Zone, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. Page 298 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FEBRUARY 19, 2020 Page 2 C. The application is for a Minor Exception (DRC2018-00473) to permit the project's proposed retaining walls to be over the 4 -foot maximum height limit (five feet, two inches proposed). The project site is within the Hillside Overlay Zone. d. The City Council makes the following findings in support of its decision to deny the application: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. This means that the project is approximately 1,351 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 and 1,345 square feet larger than the average residence on the south side of Camino Predera. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and street and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the City Council finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." The Planning Commission, at the November 131" Planning Commission meeting, expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape therefore establishing an adverse precedent. The City Council has independently reviewed the record and concurs with the Planning Commission's findings and concerns. As a result, the City Council finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. 3. General Plan Compatibility: The City Council finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed Page 299 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FEBRUARY 19, 2020 Page 3 above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. In addition, the City Council recognizes the comments have been received from neighborhood residents that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's small single-family homes. The Planning Commission, at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting, received public comments that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's smaller single-family homes. Similar comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. 3. Based upon all available evidence presented to this City Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is not consistent with the General Plan. The proposed Minor Exception to permit additional retaining wall height is not consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan encourages complementary infill development (General Plan Policy LU -2.4). The related design review (DRC2017-00244) is for a 4,118 square foot single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average house size within Tract 10035 (based on the existing and approved residences within the Tract 10035). The proposed building size along with the proposed building setbacks creates the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. b. The proposed development is not compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. For the reasons stated above, the proposed single-family residence is not compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area as it is significantly larger than the other residences in the same tract (Tract 10035) and is proposed to be constructed at the minimum side yard setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding the lot and increasing the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is not necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The necessity for retaining walls above the height limit can be mitigated by reducing the size of the proposed residence and by increasing the side yard setbacks. d. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege as the additional retaining wall height is related to a proposed single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks. The City has been contacted by property owners in the surrounding neighborhood who are opposed to the project based on the size of the proposed residence, the height of the residence above curb face on Camino Predera and the width of the project (built at minimum setbacks). 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the Page 300 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FEBRUARY 19, 2020 Page 4 requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision DRC2019-00975 and upholds the Planning Commission decision to deny Minor Exception DRC2018-00473. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to the appellants that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, to Mr. Paul Bardos, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of February, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dated: JANICE C. REYNOLDS, City Clerk Page 301 Hillside Design Review (Appeal) DRC2019-00975 February 19, 2020 Project Overview Project: A request to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot garage and 374 square feet of patios and porches on the 15,430 square foot project site Entitlements: Appeal DRC2019-00975 Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 Zoning Designation: Low (L) Residential District Overlay District: Hillside Overlay (HO) District General Plan Designation: Low Tract 10035 History • Tentative Tract Map 10035 was originally approved on March 251 1981, and comprises 38 lots; • The project site is Lot 13 of Tract Map 10035; • As of February developed with development; 20201 21 lots within 3 more lots having the tract have been been approved for • 14 lots remain without entitlements, each of which is located along the south side of Camino Predera. Project Review Timeline • The project was submitted for review in March of 2017; • The project went through several cycles of review to revise the design for compliance with the Development Code; • The City deemed the application "Complete" for processing purposes in September of 2019; • Neighborhood meeting held on June 10, 2019; • Design Review Committee meeting held on October 15, 2019. Resident Concerns The resident's raised the following concerns at the neighborhood and DRC meetings, which they believe makes the proposed residence out of character with the existing neighborhood: 1. Building height above street curb; 2. Building at the minimum 5 and 10 foot setbacks; 3. Overall building size/massing. Planning Commission Meeting (November 12, 2019) • Staff highlighted that the project was out of character with the neighborhood based on the building size, massing and minimum side yard setbacks giving the appearance of overbuilding the lot; • Applicant highlighted that the project complied to all related development standards and that the house was at 9 feet above curb level to reduce view obstructions; • Neighbors raised concerns related building height, building setbacks and building size. Planning Commission Decision • Planning Commission, while conflicted, felt that the applicant should do more to address neighbor concerns; • They stated that reducing the overall size/massing of the proposed house and increasing the side yard setbacks would reduce the impact on the existing residents; • Planning Commission voted 5-0 to have staff return at the next PC meeting with resolutions of denial; • The resolutions of denial were placed on the December 11, 2019, PC consent calendar, which was approved; • Applicant appealed project on December 19, 2019, within the required 10 day appeal period. � :r - a• � Itis u gill Ca'��i� �, �'� ' i� � •; �'" -' � � ., wG �� �:< m Q 1= t] F e ti fs4 . �'. 1• y,y:.� i � ^ ':� - Taff. 7W Development Requirements Requirement Proposed Compliant? Front Yard Setback 37 feet 57 feet Yes Side Yard Setbacks 5 and 10 feet 5 and 10 feet Yes Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 85 feet Yes Lot Coverage 40 percent 32 percent Yes Building Height Overall 30 feet 30 feet Yes Building Height at Curb Face 91 Retaining Wall Height 4 feet max 5 feet Yes Cut/Fill 5 feet 11.5* Feet Yes *Grading in Excess of 5 feet Requires Planning Commission Approval �CA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �CA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �CA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L ---------- Szm mafT cID Kr ------------ 1.11 ------------ i ------------- aUILDING ENVELOPE 0179&,5G 94,11-I'Mr CZNC ME RDCPM 13ULDNG ENVELOPE 0 1268.0 I re -Y WEST ELEVATION RLL UMTH a 19T Fes" �EPLAP SMG a- GEN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA _:..ter_• ..71Ila m jp� x -r9 ,jai r.�' .. 'S .. i.�^ S• � CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Updated Development Standards • Planning Department is working with residents to develop new development standards to reconcile the longstanding issues; • Neighborhood meetings were held on August 8, 2019, and on September 9, 2019, to discuss issues; • Staff developed new development standards in an effort to balance the concerns of vacant lot owners and existing property owners; • The new standards were presented at the January 22, 2020, PC meeting; • Vacant lot owners and existing property owners did not agree with new standards and PC asked staff to hold an additional neighborhood meeting. Neighborhood Meeting (January 30, 2020) • Approximately 17 persons attended meeting in Tri - Community room at City Hall; • Staff opened the meeting, presented the ground rules and left room to give residents time to discuss issues; • Staff debriefed the attendees after discussion period and found that common ground had not been reached on the major issues of building height and setbacks; • The residents asked for more time to resolve the outstanding issues; • Staff presented the outcome of the neighborhood meeting at the February 12, 2020, PC meeting, and the Planning Commission continued the new standards. Staff Recommendation That the City Council deny Appeal DRC2019-00975 and uphold the Planning Commission decision to deny Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 for the following reasons: • Project Conflicts with Intent of Hillside Design Guidelines: The project is proposed at the minimum side setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, which conflicts with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures; • Project Is Incompatible with Existing Neighborhood: The size/massing of the proposed residence is out of character with the exiting residences along Camino Predera; • Project is Inconsistent with General Plan: General Plan Policy LU -2.4 promotes "complementary infill development... that contributes positively to the surrounding neighborhood." Based on the comments received by the neighborhood, the proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of this General Plan policy. CITY COUNCIL APPEAL FEBRUARY 19,2020 NEW CUSTOM HOME 8035 CAMINO PREDERA 4118 Sq Ft Living Area D RC2017-00244 HOW DOES THE HOME EXCEED THE MINIMUM CODE STANDARDS? CAMINO PREDERA'S TOPOGRAPHY STAFF COMMENTS MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 5'2" RETAINING WALL 1� F296 d FF EMCF BUI-DIW Dfd9ENSI6NS r�as.a r� n 5'W 101,50 tw 729 `x— _41 ?297.50 TW sa T N—p" cWIvrl CL H=4 --.N-i I B lk rc 7; F1 STAFF COMMENTS MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 5'2" RETAINING WALL LU 2.4 DRC2013-00961 Storm Western DRC2015-00114 Lewis Homes DRC 2015-00683 Archibald Oil STAFF COMMENTS MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 5'2" RETAINING WALL LU 2.4 LARGER THAN "AVERAGE" HOME SIZE TRACT 10035 CAMINO PREDERA LdT# AM Common Addrms fie[ Lot Area horns S11e Year Rufft Lot 1 0207-641-014000 Drury 13965 Lot 2 0207-641-024000 Wang 25470 Lot 3 0207-641-03-0000 9083 Camino Predera Dera 28048 380E 2019 Lot 4 0207-6414Y0000 8089 Camino Predera Semler 19765 4453 2018 Lots 0207-641-054000 Padilla 22600 Lot 6 0207-641-06-0000 Samiee 17720 Lot 7 0207-641-074000 Samiee ifi810 Lot 8 0207-641- S-0000 Samiee 13120 Lot 9 0207-641-09-0000 Samiee 13272 Lot 10 0207-641-1.0-0000 Adams 13815 Lot 11 0207-631-014000 Adams 14542 Lot 12 0207-631-02-0000 8045 Canino Predera Adams 14542 4315 2009 Lot 13 0207-631-03-0000 8035 Canino Predera Stoops 15360 4889 2019 Lot 14 0207-6314M-0000 Ice 15484 Lot 1s 0207-631-054000 Patel 15680 Lot 16 0207-631-06-0000 Patel 15600 Lot 17 0207-631-074000 7997 Camino Predera Weber 15440 3845 2005 Lot 18 0207-631-08-0000 Mahli 15312 Lot 19 0207-631-094000 7979 Camino Predera Agraso 1287E 3413 2005 Lot 20 0207-631-10-0000 7967 Camino Predera Ti Chun Lo 13068 3291 2005 Lot 21 0207-631-11-0000 7957 Camino Predera Gonzalez 18880 3825 2005 Lot 22 0207-631-24-0000 797E Camino Predera Hay 10900 2996 1989 Lot 23 0207-631-25-0000 Campos 12600 Lot 24 0207-631-14-0001 2735 Predera Ct Ford 11500 3074 1989 Lot 25 0207-631-15-0000 872E Predera Ct Arterhum 14015 3348 2003 Lot 26 0207-631-ifi-0000 8720 Predera Ct Hal 14596 3589 2003 Lot 27 0207-631-17-0000 8714 Predera Ct Varela 15375 5133 1995 Lot 28 0207-631-18-0000 .0715 Predera Ct Le 14544 4588 2007 Lot 29- 0207-631-19-0000 2721 Predera Ct Rowden 13888 3101 2003 Lot 30 0207-631-20-0001 2725 Predera Ct Soquet 13865 3605 1959 Lot 31. 0207-631-21-0000 9034 Camino Predera MrNinrh 14784 5721 2007 Lot 32 0207-631-224000 E044Carnino Predera U 12865 3613 2007 Lot 33 0207-631-234000 2054Canrino Predera Scott 12104 4425 2009 Lot 34 0207-641-11-0000 8062 Camino Predera Nosrat 12103 3938 2006 Lot 35 0207-641-12-0000 8065 Camino Predera Galvan 12000 6175 2018 Lot 36 0207-641-13-0000 2072 Camino Predera Reyes 11800 3049 1987 Lot 37 0207-641-14-0000 8080 Camino Predera Snedeker 10540 3360 1989 Lot 38 0207-641-15-0001 8088 Camino Predera Massey 11550 3012 1989 E50: C Li I 0 35M Ely z5M Camino Predera New Home Construction Over Time Z" 1987 1989 1984 1469 1984 1489 9995 2043 Z403 2003 2405 2405 ZM ZWS 2M& 244ff 2007 2407 2064 2074 2418 ZMR 2014 2414 Year Built -40-Seriesl —Tr-endline STAFF COMMENTS MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 5'2" RETAINING WALL LU 2.4 LARGER THAN "AVERAGE" HOME SIZE FLOOR AREA RATIO - "FAR" (LOT COVERAGE) MANSIONIZATION ORDINANCE - CITY OF LA STAFF COMMENTS MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 5'2" RETAINING WALL LU 2.4 LARGER THAN "AVERAGE" HOME SIZE SECTION 17.122.020.D.2.a a. The design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views. For example, within a development, the majority of the units should not be designed with minimum setback to minimum setback. STAFF COMMENTS MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 5'2" RETAINING WALL LU 2.4 LARGER THAN "AVERAGE" HOME SIZE SECTION 17.122.020.D.2.A CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD CITY OF RC HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE "NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION AREA" "NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER AREA (NCA)" STAFF COMMENTS MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 - VARIANCE REQUEST FOR 5'2" RETAINING WALL LU 2.4 LARGER THAN "AVERAGE" HOME SIZE SECTION 17.122.020.D.2.A CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD SB330 — THE EMERGENCY HOUSING CRISIS ACT OF 2019 ""Objective design standard" is: "..a design standard that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and is uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official before submittal of an application." DESIGN ELEMENTS wpwe IF 07 - ,� Big l 1 62' H=78" —! 1300.5C nL5 � u f H=3'6" �V 12 SEE ARCHIi 7296.0 FF EXACT BU/L � Nt N-4 1297.50 TW LU ®��®N . 8d - Ql- LLJ 4RON Cn ly- W L 11 l 1 62' H=78" —! 1300.5C nL5 � u f H=3'6" �V 12 SEE ARCHIi 7296.0 FF EXACT BU/L � Nt N-4 1297.50 TW ®��®N l 1 62' H=78" —! 1300.5C nL5 � u f H=3'6" �V 12 SEE ARCHIi 7296.0 FF EXACT BU/L � Nt N-4 1297.50 TW WILDING ENVELOPE 0 1285.0 SULDINCa ENVELOPE 0 1299.0 BSL PROJECT 191E M DRC2O11-80244 ,Y -d its, - i' -e REVISION Z Co IF— Q } N LU Q LU r Fp a au w Q CIO w � �Qo amu= j7- TN �y T rp LU DATE i161mi LB As SHEET A-5 of 12 s�Te BUILDING ENVELOPE 61 1256.50 ---------- ------------------------ - - - - - - - - - - ------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EWE - - - - - - - - - - ----------- Dmw WEST ELEVATION 1/44 - I' -4e ------------ ------------ I WEST ELEVATION 118' - l' -w --BUILDING ENVELOPE 0 1288.0 ------- T WILDING EN ' m atm W , I ----------- 4 MAMM W&L FLLL LESOTH OF 19T " WALL LU LLl Q CJ W -g -2 -2 < w -PR in !R DATE itsimi SCALP, AS NOM 8HEET A-10 4 OF 12 swm-m r I I I I I I I I v el — TI I GYF I I yy I 'Z F � WY�!lINOLL I I 61R4164R !'S9! I i 42 au ftyK I � I r iEET LYS •TOG 03®V.6'� _ + _ _ _ PROJECT FILE M ORC2611-66244 :1396.8 i I I I I I I I LI TI ml _I 9RG!® %dAICE � Wi3 / CpIL nx RCOKM6 BiRAKirt �9! I 7� WVER I .nFE 57m URS -6 TOG REwr�ari a } LU u a a au � W d Q w 13 � V O N u z lF1'} 13 3 � LLI� r �6+ r ll���l1 Q Z pC DATE 11617617 ALE M Jos SHEET A-5 OF 12 64E m PROJECT FILE* ORC20I1-00244 5UILDING-ENVELOPE 0 12%.5 BUILDING ENVELOPE A 1294.5 r ` T--- .sg'6�abNrn LQJG11 D2"L BUILDING ENVELOPE 6 1288. `. ------ �'i , o-umeraan 21mutwww BUILDING ENVELOPE 6 USSR - , �/Ib11ePIR4FTYA! ancaalrt ease I I I L I f-----'I',------------------ .......... I I �I I I I , I 0 0 0 0I�oomb \' \ hw�) I I I p'II e I � I w wow M LL'Ob'D I �I W CALL NX ❑ BMG ❑ ❑ BMG 04" POR—v CLAWY b �`---_iA-e' r a'r' �UC1CafCll�i LA FNBRA %-194 NATURAL Rvt7¢ �--- � rcr ---- J— --J cweM_m ) ROCK V NM MEn Luau cm) iTTP) oac 'MFn m BsL � mm 1/11x) 85L � SOUTH ELEVAWN GARAGE DOOR STYLE PROJECT FILE M DRC26I1-00244 SP K DELOW DECK gam a LL 413 LEDGE 413 IaPGE ry �4EAVY TIMBER ARBOR AUBURN #33 I RIDGE vaea5i 4 � � y7J, n TYPICAL GABLE VENT =EEo EoE waso,s,� =E ED CHISELED SILL ROOF PLAN SCALE 4" = I ®" r k. Hardie Plank'" Lap Siding HardiePaner Vertical Siding 0 HardieShingle$ Siding Indw&W Shingles not available in the D;wer dst im .4 t # �r ,' J 8mp I Trim ABOUT JAMES HARDIE INDWIDUAL SHINGLES* ,may r Thies 1/4 in. LK%m 4.2 in. 5.5 in_ sawd 15.25 in. Exposure 7 in_ PcLf allei GW 5+4A" 2 PCRYS4 315 Available Gokws &75 in. 7,25 in. 10an. �mmmw-mm mmmmmmmmm MENNEN PRODUCTS COLOR r 0 HardiePlankr, Lap Siding HardiePanel$ Vertical Siding HarchaShingle"I Siding 'These 125 in. and V in. are ordp azvlablp prkM. "• 81fep I Trim ABOUT JAMES HARDIE SELECT CEDARMILL* Mke &-A)ck rawrn Tlri dims Iumm 1 ram EXPwmm C 6xvkm Pcs.fPallet Prue Pasipallet Pcs1S4 Avanable Colors 5/16 in. 12 ft planks 5.25 in_ 6.25 in 4 in. 5 in. 280 360 308 25.0 24.8 7.25 in_ 8.25 in - 9 in_ 7 in_ 252 210 252 230 16.7 14.3 925 in-' 12 in." 8 in. 14.75 an. 990 152 12.5 9.3 MENNEN No MENNEN IN 801111111TH] 1614 1*11161:V rig a Neer Pv i&j CAMINO PREDERA'S TOPOGRAPHY i � — � "� � �- � �. �? .. __ �� ,._. �. �. •Pr's" - i�� -�� ` _ y, s - • k z i ` lk ti r r� •� z r ��// r �. :+ "�� s: - „mac, - •�",• r r - - - Nil 4=W-- 46 19 WA 0 0 E -M Arl 4A� .' � , v Y 'r•., wl • V-111, 4. _ r �All 1 V '01 yrs � J a I .' � , v Y 'r•., EXHIBIT Bm 20'FROM TOP OF CURB '�� _ __ _ �• � 'r'�_� •�2r � .��� _ 'b �+�+�#+r4.sY,■ _ r��: i���_ a��_�� -iw��r� _ �� � _ _.*� ! •may - tea• �rt �• ♦YF _ •� ! mayy' �� y��• � —T PE` - � '{# YTa _ � + T Lao LAI, ' - _ _ .. L t i t T . J AOL .16 i 40&6f.L;F• 16. m MAL --Mir, 1 -.... - # - ti : _ s - - --I 4 - prr r �7 f V� - Conclusion: 1. THE SUBMITTAL MEETS ALL THE TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT CODES AND THE SPIRIT OF THE CODES 2. THE SUBMITTAL INCORPORATES NUMEROUS AND SIGNIFICANT MITIGATING FEATURES IN CONSIDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS AND THE SENSITIVITIES OF HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT 3. CURRENT PUBLIC POLICY THROUGHOUT THE STATE STRONGLY ENCOURAGES NEW HOUSING CONSTRUCTION BECAUSE OF A CRITICAL HOUSING SHORTAGE (SB330 - THE EMERGENCY HOUSING ACT OF 2019) 4. DRC, PLANNINC COMMISSION AND NEIGHBORS COMMENTS HAVE BEEN OVERALL COMPLIMENTARY OF THE ARCHITECTURAL STYLE AND DESIGNS AND THERE IS STRONG NEIGHBOR SUPPORT 5. THE HOME IS CONSISTENT WITH NEIGHBORHOOD TRENDS AND PAST APPROVALS 6. THE SUBMITTAL ENCOURAGES SIMILAR LOWERED DEVELOPMENT TO CONTINUE EASTWARD WITH LOWERED STREET PROFILES 7. EACH SITE IS UNIQUE AND EACH APPLICATION SHOULD BE REVIEWED ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS USING SITE TOPOGRAPHY 8. INCORPORATE WITH THIS APPEAL ALL PRIOR COMMUNICATIONS WITH CITY REPRESENTATIVES THAT RELATE TO CAMINO PREDERA AND ALL PRIOR SUBMITTALS TO THE CITY FOR NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION ON THE STREET. 9. FOR THE COUNCIL TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO MORE HEAVILY WEIGHT TOPOGRAPHY ON PREDERA AS SIGNIFICANT FACTOR IN APPROVALS. 10. APPLICANT RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THIS PROJECT BE APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL 02/19/2020 - RECEIVED DURING PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING ITEM J2. February 19, 2020 Good evening Mayor Michael and Council Members, My name is Renee Massey. My husband Lynn and I have lived on Camino Predera for twenty three years, and tonight, along with our neighbors, we want to extend our support for staff's recommendation to this Council. The ANALYSIS presented this evening regarding Resident Concerns captures the essence of what we, the residents on Camino Predera have been expressing to staff, the Planning Commission and City Council for twenty years. Our concerns over that time have been consistent and remain so this evening regarding this project. They are related to building height, building setbacks and the massive overall size of the structure. The staff has based its conclusions on current standards and has stated "the project is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code". The Staff's report is extensive and thorough and we appreciate the many hours of preparation. We thank Council for their leadership and based on staff's recommendation, we encourage the City Council to adopt both resolutions as presented this evening. Thank You, Renee and Lynn Massey 02/19/2020 City Council Meeting Item 12: Additional Material/ Correspondence From: Susan McNinch To: Paul Cc: Lynn Massey 1pfsmassCabgmail.comj; Rob Patel (rob(d)socaltitle24.comj; jadamsrancho('Oamail.com; chuck(a)charlesjoseph.biz; Marv; BLilly Subject: Re: Camino Predera Date: Saturday, February 01, 2020 4:45:28 PM Attachments: Worley Logo 2019 RGB email.png 01 Susan and I are in total concurrence with what Paul has eloquently articulated. Our main desire would be a maximum height above curb level of 10 feet, but understand that this need to be evaluated on a case by case basis to preserve views for all. Thankyou William (Bill) McNinch Vice President/Senior Project Director 101 E HuntlnRton Dr. Suite 100, Monrovia, CA 91016 T: 626 803 5406 work 1 626 551 8739 cell www.worley.com Worley �iY Sent from my Wad On Jan 31, 2020, at 10:03 AM, Paul <paul@bardosconstruction.com> wrote: To all: I'm starting the discussion to summarize and memorialize our meeting of last night at city hall. I have included all of those for whom I have email addresses, but for those I'm missing (and to those who have additional emails to add for others) please forward this on to them to contribute. My intention is to start off with our discussion points from last night to assist planning staff on the areas where the concepts were generally agreed upon to move forward and where additional discussion needs to take place. When a comment to this email is added, please be sure to "Reply to All" when responding. Having one email being circulated will keep the dialog open and frank as occurred last night and it will also serve to consolidate the discussion points in one place for forwarding to staff. We may then see where the disagreements exist and continue to work towards full resolution. At Mike Smith's request last night, please provide your comments over the weekend for forwarding to him by Monday afternoon. Additionally, there was a consensus last night that the discussion was both constructive and productive but that given the shortened notice additional time to develop further resolution is needed beyond Monday. The neighbors would request that the Planning Commission move their current date of February 12, 2020 to a further hearings on DRC0004-2020, ("the Predera Review") to a time in late February or early March - a two to three week continuance. Disclaimer!! In no way is this first email intended to create a concrete decision on any single point, but rather, it is a beginning for contributions by all the property owners to round out the discussion and formalize the understandings reached to narrower the context. Ultimately it will be staff's role to use their expertise to formulate the necessary language or policy guidelines to effectuate the understandings agreed upon here and that are to be applied on future development applications. General Goals: It is the intention of the neighbors to expedite approvals, reduce ambiguities in interpreting the current Development Code within the Hillside Overlay (" the Standards"), and set new Standards for future homes that are beneficial to all concerned. Maximizing views for all residents is the primary goal. In general the topographical features of each of the lots should be the more heavily weighted factor in future property developments. Each lot should be reviewed by staff on a case by case basis that takes into consideration the following factors: (1) How will the development impact views of existing residents?; (2) How will the views of the applicant be similarly protected?; (3) What are the topographical features of the property that can be applied under current Hillside Standards to influence the placement of the proposed residence on the property? (e.g. should the current standard of 5' cut and fill be maintained in some instances or should latitude be given for unique property characteristics or hardship - i.e. staffs proposed recommendation to increase retaining wall heights to 8' could be granted under a variance based on a topographical hardship). However, an 8' wall should not be used to create an artificial man-made building elevation. Both the 5' and 8' standards could be applied as the controlling factor to reduce cut and fills preserving the intent of the Hillside Overlay while maximizing view potential to the applicant and existing residents; and (4) maximize property owner's use to the full extent of their property boundaries and up to current design Standards. These factors are to be applied collectively to minimize massing at or near the street level while also encouraging development, whenever practical for the applicant that's based upon topography (e.g. the Danny Dera model). Retaining walls should be utilized to create lower profiles and increase building front yard setbacks rather than the opposite wherever practical. Case by Case Basis The residents of Predera recognize the unique characteristics of each of the lots and how some lots lend themselves to increased front yard setbacks, lower street profiles, wider side setbacks and a select few do not. These characteristics, unique to each lot, are both an attribute and a challenge to development depending on whether or not the design approaches are used properly. Therefore each applicant's submittal shall be reviewed on a case by case basis following the previously described guidelines and those that will follow now. Some generally agreed upon guidelines from last night's discussion follows in a lot by lot description below While this may present additional challenges to staff in the future, those challenges can be mitigated by a formalized policy statement in a written hand-out form available to future applicants wishing to build. For reference, Lot 1 begins at the west side of Camino Predera at its intersection with Red Hill Country Club Drive. The lots are consecutively numbered from there to lot 16, which is at the south side of the intersection of Camino Predera and Predera Court. A tract map is included with this email for reference. Lot 12, the Adams' home, is built. Lot 4 - Semler - is entitled as is the case with Lot 3 - Dera. The remainder of the lots are vacant. The remaining vacant lots are: Lot # Owner Attendance Comments Lot 1 Drury Did not attend North/South sloping lot. Minimal view impacts because of location. Likely best suited for terraced floor plan following north/south lot contours Lot 2 Wang Did not attend Similar to Lot 1 but could benefit from increased front yard setback to a lower natural building pad area below and away from the street. Lot 3 Dera Did not attend Entitled Lot 4 Semler Did not Attend Entitled Lot 5 Padilla Did not attend Preliminary application submitted then abandoned shortly thereafter. Lower natural pad area available -similar to Dera contours. 10' & 15' setbacks possible from wider lot width and lot size. Reduced elevation above street possible and limited to 6-8' overall Lot 6-9 Samiee Did not attend Similar to Dera contours. 10' & 15' setbacks possible from wider lot width. Reduced elevation above street possible and limited to 6-8' overall Lot 10 Adams Present Large earthen mound remnant from street construction. Should be allowed 14' height and standard 5 & 10' setbacks to match mound remnant Lot 11 Adams Present Current Application - Large earthen mound remnant from street construction. Should be allowed 14' height and standard 5 & 10' setbacks to match mound remnant Lot 12 Adams Present Completed Construction Lot 13 Stoops Present Current Application Lot 14 Patel Family Present Future discussions pending on Monday - between the Patel's and Boquet's -recommended reduced height balanced against steep grade drops and difficult built site Lot 15 Patel Family Present Application Pending - Future discussions pending on Monday - between Patel's and Boquet's - recommended reduced height balanced against steep grade drops and challenging build site Lot 16 Patel Family Present Current Application - Future discussions pending on Monday between Patel's and Boquet's - recommended reduced height balanced against steep grade drops and challenging build site Additional Comments: It was generally agreed that garages may be constructed under any configuration allowed by current Standards to include tandem. Articulation and a recognizable architectural style as currently required under the Standards were broadly supported. Roof ridge orientation was not a significant issue if coupled with the overall objectives sought to be achieved. I know this is not a comprehensive summary of every detail and I am rely on everyone to contribute to the discussion to complete any of the remaining items. Hopefully we can get something together that makes sense for Mike on Monday. I would like to thank everyone for their continued contributions to resolving these issues. I think we'll all celebrate when the last home is built and we can enjoy our hard work. Best, Paul �v4 RAkDOS Paul Bardos 595 Daley Lane Kalispell, MT 59901 Paul(@BordosConstruction.com (406) 309-8080 (Office) 909 982-3831(FAX) (909) 241-7627 (Cell) Lic # 505220 B, C39, C20 Multiple Award Winning Builder This e-mail message and any attachments to this e-mail message contain confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are NOT the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hardcopy, download, copy, print or otherwise disseminate or retain this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact my office at the number above and notify me of the error by return e-mail. Please then delete the message erroneously received. <Tract Map 10035.pdf> 02/19/2020 City Council Meetingl Item J2: Additional Material/ Correspondence From: Paul To: "chuck(abcharlesiosenh.biz"; nfsmass(dgmail.com; mcninchl0(alamail.com; rob(a)socaltitle24.com; iadamsrancho(domail.com; Mme; "christooher.nosratocimail.com" Cc: Suzanne Buquet; T13Snedeker0greatdane.com; Thomas Reves; "danny.dera0cimail.com"; "mcninch(a)att.net" Subject: RE: Camino Predera Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 10:29:00 AM Attachments: ima-211100203-0001.odf Lynn and Renee, Mary and I are returning the request to continue the PC hearing on amendments for DRC 0004-2020 to you signed with our support for another meeting. We believe our last meeting was constructive and productive and we are optomistic that another meeting will produce a final agreement of all the neighbors that the city will support. Best, Paul and Mary _% BAP D0 Paul Bardos 595 Daley Lane Kalispell, MT 59901 Paul PBardosConstruction. corn www.bardosconstruction.com (406) 309-8080 (Office) (909) 982-3831(FAX) (909) 241-7627 (Cell) Lic # 505220 B, C39, C20 Multiple Award Winning Builder This e-mail message and any attachments to this e-mail message contain confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are NOT the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hardcopy, download, copy, print or otherwise disseminate or retain this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact my office at the number above and notify me of the error by return e-mail. Please then delete the message erroneously received. From: chuck@charlesjoseph.biz[mailto:chuck@charlesjoseph.bizj Sent: Monday, February 03, 2020 3:12 PM To: Paul; pfsmass@gmail.com; mcninchl0@gmail.com; rob@socaItitle24.com; jadamsrancho@gmail.com; Mary Cc: Suzanne Buquet; TBSnedeker@greatdane.com; Thomas Reyes Subject: RE: Camino Predera Paul: Thanks for your e-mail. I appreciate you taking the time at the property owners meeting to constructively participate in the discussion and consensus building that occurred before staff came back in for the final time, but also for putting together your summary of various points of discussion that occurred during the meeting. The key issue is the pressure being brought to bear following almost no known activity after the September 9, 2019 Workshop until we received notice of the January 22, 2020, Planning Commission hearing for the Development Code Amendment, staff report being unavailable until after hours on Thursday, January 16th, City Hall closed on Friday through Monday, and no opportunity for communication with City staff until City Hall opened on Tuesday, January 21, 2020, the day before the Planning Commission hearing. Regrettably, I believe that we were very close to obtaining general consensus on compromise that could have constructively identified and addressed the concerns of both the resident property owners and the property owners who want to develop and sell the remaining vacant lots on the south side of Camino Predera. In fairness, following 20 years of not much being accomplished to address the concerns of the respective property owners, the City should allow for a reasonable opportunity to continue with collective communication that could result in a constructive resolution of the key issues and allow for the continuance of what was a good start by the City to hopefully result with a positive ending. Thanks for your help with this. Please feel free to contact me at your earliest opportunity should you have any questions or need of additional information or assistance with this matter. Thanks, Chuck Buquet, President Charles Joseph Associates 9581 Business Center Drive, Suite D Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Office (909) 481-1822 Fax (909)320-2296 *******************PLEASE NOTE****************** This message, along with any attachments, may be confidential or legally privileged. It is intended only for the named person(s), who is/are the only authorized recipients. If this message has reached you in error, kindly destroy it without review and notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your help. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Camino Predera From: Paul <oaul(&bardosconstruction.com> Date: Fri, January 31, 2020 10:03 am To: "Lynn Massey (pfsmass(&amail.com)" <pfsmass(&amail.com>, "mcninch 10(a)gmail. com" <mcninch10(a)gmail.com>, "Rob Patel (rob(asocaltitle24.com)" <rob@)socaltitle24.com>, "jadamsrancho(&gmail.com" <jadamsrancho(a�gmail.com>, "chuck(obcharlesioseph.biz" <chuck( charlesjoseph.biz>, Mary <mary(a)bardosconstruction.com> To all: I'm starting the discussion to summarize and memorialize our meeting of last night at city hall. I have included all of those for whom I have email addresses, but for those I'm missing (and to those who have additional emails to add for others) please forward this on to them to contribute. My intention is to start off with our discussion points from last night to assist planning staff on the areas where the concepts were generally agreed upon to move forward and where additional discussion needs to take place. When a comment to this email is added, please be sure to "Reply to All" when responding. Having one email being circulated will keep the dialog open and frank as occurred last night and it will also serve to consolidate the discussion points in one place for forwarding to staff. We may then see where the disagreements exist and continue to work towards full resolution. At Mike Smith's request last night, please provide your comments over the weekend for forwarding to him by Monday afternoon. Additionally, there was a consensus last night that the discussion was both constructive and productive but that given the shortened notice additional time to develop further resolution is needed beyond Monday. The neighbors would request that the Planning Commission move their current date of February 12, 2020 to a further hearings on DRC0004-2020, ("the Predera Review") to a time in late February or early March - a two to three week continuance. Disclaimer!! In no way is this first email intended to create a concrete decision on any single point, but rather, it is a beginning for contributions by all the property owners to round out the discussion and formalize the understandings reached to narrower the context. Ultimately it will be staff's role to use their expertise to formulate the necessary language or policy guidelines to effectuate the understandings agreed upon here and that are to be applied on future development applications. General Goals: It is the intention of the neighbors to expedite approvals, reduce ambiguities in interpreting the current Development Code within the Hillside Overlay (" the Standards"), and set new Standards for future homes that are beneficial to all concerned. Maximizing views for all residents is the primary goal. In general the topographical features of each of the lots should be the more heavily weighted factor in future property developments. Each lot should be reviewed by staff on a case by case basis that takes into consideration the following factors: (1) How will the development impact views of existing residents?; (2) How will the views of the applicant be similarly protected?; (3) What are the topographical features of the property that can be applied under current Hillside Standards to influence the placement of the proposed residence on the property? (e.g. should the current standard of 5' cut and fill be maintained in some instances or should latitude be given for unique property characteristics or hardship - i.e. staff's proposed recommendation to increase retaining wall heights to 8' could be granted under a variance based on a topographical hardship). However, an 8' wall should not be used to create an artificial man-made building elevation. Both the 5' and 8' standards could be applied as the controlling factor to reduce cut and fills preserving the intent of the Hillside Overlay while maximizing view potential to the applicant and existing residents; and (4) maximize property owner's use to the full extent of their property boundaries and up to current design Standards. These factors are to be applied collectively to minimize massing at or near the street level while also encouraging development, whenever practical for the applicant that's based upon topography (e.g. the Danny Dera model). Retaining walls should be utilized to create lower profiles and increase building front yard setbacks rather than the opposite wherever practical. Case by Case Basis The residents of Predera recognize the unique characteristics of each of the lots and how some lots lend themselves to increased front yard setbacks, lower street profiles, wider side setbacks and a select few do not. These characteristics, unique to each lot, are both an attribute and a challenge to development depending on whether or not the design approaches are used properly. Therefore each applicant's submittal shall be reviewed on a case by case basis following the previously described guidelines and those that will follow now. Some generally agreed upon guidelines from last night's discussion follows in a lot by lot description below While this may present additional challenges to staff in the future, those challenges can be mitigated by a formalized policy statement in a written hand-out form available to future applicants wishing to build. For reference, Lot 1 begins at the west side of Camino Predera at its intersection with Red Hill Country Club Drive. The lots are consecutively numbered from there to lot 16, which is at the south side of the intersection of Camino Predera and Predera Court. A tract map is included with this email for reference. Lot 12, the Adams' home, is built. Lot 4 - Semler - is entitled as is the case with Lot 3 - Dera. The remainder of the lots are vacant. The remaining vacant lots are: Lot # Owner Attendance Comments Lot 1 Drury Did not attend North/South sloping lot. Minimal view impacts because of location. Likely best suited for terraced floor plan following north/south lot contours Lot 2 Wang Did not attend Similar to Lot 1 but could benefit from increased front yard setback to a lower natural building pad area below and away from the street. Lot 3 Dera Did not attend Entitled Lot 4 Semler Did not Attend Entitled Lot 5 Padilla Did not attend Preliminary application submitted then abandoned shortly thereafter. Lower natural pad area available - similar to Dera contours. 10'& 15' setbacks possible from wider lot width and lot size. Reduced elevation above street possible and limited to 6-8' overall Lot 6-9 Samiee Did not attend Similar to Dera contours. 10' & 15' setbacks possible from wider lot width. Reduced elevation above street possible and limited to 6-8' overall Lot 10 Adams Present Large earthen mound remnant from street construction. Should be allowed 14' height and standard 5 & 10' setbacks to match mound remnant Lot 11 Adams Present Current Application - Large earthen mound remnant from street construction. Should be allowed 14' height and standard 5 & 10' setbacks to match mound remnant Lot 12 Adams Present Completed Construction Lot 13 Stoops Present Current Application Lot 14 Patel Family Present Future discussions pending on Monday - between the Patel's and Boquet's -recommended reduced height balanced against steep grade drops and difficult built site Lot 15 Patel Family Present Application Pending - Future discussions pending on Monday - between Patel's and Boquet's - recommended reduced height balanced against steep grade drops and challenging build site Lot 16 Patel Family Present Current Application - Future discussions pending on Monday between Patel's and Boquet's - recommended reduced height balanced against steep grade drops and challenging build site Additional Comments: It was generally agreed that garages may be constructed under any configuration allowed by current Standards to include tandem. Articulation and a recognizable architectural style as currently required under the Standards were broadly supported. Roof ridge orientation was not a significant issue if coupled with the overall objectives sought to be achieved. I know this is not a comprehensive summary of every detail and I am rely on everyone to contribute to the discussion to complete any of the remaining items. Hopefully we can get something together that makes sense for Mike on Monday. I would like to thank everyone for their continued contributions to resolving these issues. I think we'll all celebrate when the last home is built and we can enjoy our hard work. Best, Paul Paul Bardos 595 Daley Lane Kalispell, MT 59901 Paul(aDBardosConstruction. com (406) 309-8080 (Office) 909 982-3831(FAX) (909) 241-7627 (Cell) Lic # 505220 81 C39, C20 Multiple Award Winning Builder This e-mail message and any attachments to this e-mail message contain confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are NOT the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hardcopy, download, copy, print or otherwise disseminate or retain this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact my office at the number above and notify me of the error by return e-mail. Please then delete the message erroneously received. 02/0uncil Meeting) Item J2: Additional Material/ Correspondence BX00S CONSTRUCTION January 21, 2020 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Planning Commissioners 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Members of the Planning Commission: Via Email: Daniel a.RodriguczL&cityofrc.us Certified Mail 7019 1640 0001 7256 7222 I write this letter to provide the Commissioners with our objections to the proposed changes to the Development Code authored by staff in DRC0004-2020 and that are recommended for approval at the Planning Commission meeting on January 22, 2020. It has long been known that the views along Camino Predera from the lots in Tract 10035 are amongst the best and most sought after in Rancho Cucamonga. It is no wonder that for 18 years residents on the north side of Predera have repeatedly objected to construction on the south side of the street to protect their views. Even a cursory review of the city's public records using the search term "Camino Predera" at https://rcdocs.cityofrc.us/WebLink/Welcomc.aspx?cr-1 yields dozens of resident's letters, staff reports, and records on appeals that over the period have unquestionably illustrated and recorded the neighbors' concern over view obstruction. For staff to omit this fact from its report and recommendations is none other than dereliction of its duty to you, the Commissioners. The recommendations of staff are also thinly veiled to circumvent California Public Policy and case precedents to create a view easement over property owners on the south side of Camino Predera for the benefit of owners on the north side of the street. Thereby staff wrongly encourages you, the decision makers here, to enter into a private contract dispute for the benefit of one party over another. The private contract was established through the CC&R's recorded on the tract at its formation and to which all of the residents have agreed by their property ownership. Staff's recommendations that you intrude will also concurrently provide a public use of Camino Predera as a view corridor without the requisite findings, notices, and hearings required to create such things. Even if staff feigns ignorance or avoidance on their attempts at creation of a view corridor or view preservation, their re -wording of the narrative and their selective language describing the neighborhood issues does not alter the realities: their recommendations are, in fact and at the very least, a taking without Just Compensation for the depravation of property owners' rights for the trespass of another. Property ownership rights are amongst the most cherished in our society and should never be abridged by government without a substantive and overriding public need. 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981 -6797 OFFICE (909) 982-383 1 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR In this case the public is not served because of the extraordinarily limited geography of the proposed regulations and the extraordinarily few number of residents these proposed standards seek to harm. Not only do these standards purport to regulate only one tract, but in simple truth, as staff report clearly makes known, the standards will apply to only a subset of 14 parcels within that tract. Existing developed homes and entitled vacant properties remain unaffected and rewarded for their development in time. This is also an "ad hoc" application of development standards that sets an unjustifiable precedent that should go hand in hand at the very least with heightened scrutiny. Staff's recommended "solutions" are not proportional to the impacts at issue and that they claim are in desperate and immediate need to be ameliorated. Staff lobbies you now to approve of their recommendations because of a differing "topography" and "development patterns" in the Red Hill community than exists in any other part of the city. Yet this assertion is unfounded and unsupported by anything other than mere conjecture and commentary. No study exists in support of the broad conclusion reached. Staff's only true evidence is the strident cacophony of a select few neighbors. Staff also implies that the Council is implicitly supporting their recommendations because of their findings on the Galvan appeal, yet the Council's findings (that denied the Galvan appeal in support of the Commissioner's approval) did not describe any such advisement to the Planning Commissioners nor was any such determination by the Council described in its resolution of denial of the appeal. We will never truly know what the full Council's position was because the applicant and the appellants reached a settlement agreement encouraged by mediation arranged by the City. To further exacerbate the issues, staff is recommending that the Commission find that 9 property owners, and no others in the city, shall be discriminated against for choosing their purchase of vacant land with a Reasonable Investment -Backed Expectation to develop their land as neighbors on both sides of the street have already been allowed to do and thereby prosper economically accordingly. There is neither fairness nor justice in any application of regulations staff proposes that pits neighbor against neighbor in close proximity to each other on the same street and indeed even as close as one next door neighbor to another. This is the case with our property and uniquely illustrated because we would be restricted even further from choosing which side of our home shall have the 15' proposed setback as the existing home to our east has a 5' setback on their west and the regulations propose that there be a minimum 20' setback between homes. Given the topography of our lot, the preferred side for a 15' setback would be to our east. We would lose the ability to choose and concurrently be burdened more so than any other property owner should these amendments be adopted. These new standards leave neighbors doing little more than vying for parity and inflamed over the application of standards with one neighbor benefiting more than another just feet away from each other. "First come first serve" will be the another new development standard on Predera - it's no longer going to be discretionary to the designer if your neighbor builds first as the existing standards currently allow for in greater fairness. 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (9❑9) 9S 1 -6797 OFFICE (9❑9) 982-383 1 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Fairness also dictates, and current zoning and housing regulations require, non-discriminatory practices in land use. Staff's proposed changes discriminate against narrower lots in preference of wider lots because increased setbacks disproportionately restrict development on the narrower lot far more than is the case for the larger or wider parcels. Where the zoning practice normally would allow for a variance for such an unfair imposition, here staff advocates to promote a more discriminatory practice instead. These conditions again unfairly "leverage" permit approval authority for excessive concessions from a single property owner that Staff now requests be determined administratively by their Director instead of by you the Commissioners as has been done in the past for decades. Staff's proposals also do not take into consideration the unique topography of the remaining lots, another commonly used factor to grant variances to Code requirements. Staff's recommendations are more appropriate for Terra Vista style developments with flat and regularly shaped lots where commonly applied standards work uniformly. Many of these lots, however, like Danny Dera's and lots 14-16 on the east side, have an initial steep drop-off at the sidewalk that levels out into a relatively flat building pad below. Other lots, such as lots 10-13 have their natural building pads at or near the street level. Lots 10 & 11 have a large earthen mound remnant from street grading and paving operations completed back in the late 80's. These 4 lots are particularly impacted sites because of the natural building site contours occurr at street level with increasingly steep slopes to their south. These conditions are the opposite for the other lots 14-16 and lots 1-9. Staff's recommendations should take into consideration topography by restricting the creation of artificial grades that would elevate the home to street level rather than utilizing the naturally occurring building pads in the lower elevation areas of the properties. Topography is something the existing Hillside Ordinance seeks to preserve and is being overlooked in these recommendations by allowing 8' retaining walls to create man- made elevations. Moreover, nowhere has staff found a nuisance, risk to public safety, or interest in preserving some underlying, long-standing public principle to support these amendments. Quite to the contrary the background principles already created here by prior entitlements on the street and throughout the city run contrary to staff's recommendations. Again, any consideration of fairness is opposite to the standards being recommended. Staff also fails to articulate its goals in promoting the change in the standards in any objective fashion or with quantifiable measurements. There are references to excessive "size (floor area)," "massing and over building," and "character of the neighborhood" in staff's report to be modified, however no objective measurements are provided by staff to illustrate the undesirable condition from the ideal one they seek to achieve. What floor area size, massing, or character does staff seek to establish? Rather, staff continues to promote more subjective characterizations as a resolution of what are already unfairly subjective oppositions. Here I would refer Commissioners to definitions in the newly enacted legislation of SB330 - The Emergency Housing Crisis Act of 2019 - that became effective on January 1, 2020 for guidance. Therein the language of the law defines an "Objective design standard" as: 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (9❑9) 9S 1 -6797 OFFICE (9❑9) 982-383 1 FAX LICENSE #5❑522❑ MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR "...a design standard that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and is uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official before submittal of an application." I would submit for the Commissioners consideration that SB330 is applicable in this instance for numerous reasons not the least of which is because staff proposes standards on the whole tract (modifying its conditions of approval ex post facto) and SB330 bars the subjectivity staff seeks to reintroduce into any further development with all the failings subjectivity will create. Should these amendments be adopted they will only continue to yield further controversy on the street. For instance, in our submittal recently denied by the Commission in December, our floor area was considered too large and our retaining wall was found to be too high, yet staff fails to define the maximum allowable floor area in their new standards (nor do they define it as the Code currently allows at 40% lot coverage) and their objections to a 5'2" wall on our project now gives rise to gratis approval of 8' high retaining walls. If we were to resubmit under the new standards we would surely look for approvals on a narrower and taller structure to the maximum height of 14', but with the same floor area elongated on the lot rather than the lower and wider more beneficial profile we previously presented. These new standards therefore do little to resolve the "massing and over building" or define the "character of the neighborhood" staff seeks to address with any "Objective design standard" as the new law requires. A careful reading of the new law would yield significant other legal impediments to staff's recommendations. In conclusion, the current language of the Development Code is and has been since creation of the tract able to accommodate and promote diverse use. As some residents require smaller housing space, those spaces exist within Tract 10035. Others, some of whom began construction decades ago, have enjoyed larger living spaces in varied architectural styles. For those who prefer smaller homes they already exist. For those who desire greater diversity in larger homes those exist too. Red Hill is an eclectic community and that pattern is rightly being repeated here in Tract 10035 in each of its uniquely designed homes. Staff provides no reason to alter what has been lawfully approved property developments by Commissioners for the past 18 years. I find it odd that development along the street progressed well with the guidance of former directors and that now new regulations are required instead. I would like to thank the Commissioners in advance for taking the time to consider these comments. Sincerely, BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. Paul Bardos, President 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (9❑9) 9S 1 -6797 OFFICE (9❑9) 982-383 1 FAX LICENSE #5❑522❑ MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR 02/19/2020 City Council Meeting Item J2: Additional Material/ Correspondence OWNERS C'E�PT/F/C,4TE /f/E.�,(EPEBY CE917FY T/.14T NE4RE T,EONLY A,4�P1/ES110P1N6giVY RZ-COK-V T/rLE //►'TE�PES!Iry T//E L4N0 SUBO/d/DED ,45SHOWN ,,;;V 11'E ANN",:0IV,4,04NO !YE (U'vs'EN! TD 17h�F P.9EP4.4q- j/ON 4N0 RE(1�RDAT/OPV Lt1�T.y/SF/N,QL M.4P4N0 f'vE.�/E.QEBY DED/C4TE T1� lNE (YTI'GF R<!N(ND(L/<,4M0�1/6,4FQQ�BL/('USEp,�iM/NOP4EDEP,4,4N0LiQEDE,44CaC/•4'l. FUrQlf/ER- ME�?E H'E4LS0 �EREB�'OED/(��TE 1p T//E(//YQ� QQNI�/D (L/l"4rONG.4 ,'�/E 0�4.�/N4GE E-4-�E' MEMS ,4NL7 �f'EfIEREBY /Rf7E{V0G4BL Y 0FFref TO 4E0/C,4TE T,yE OI ",4'GOHi EASE1IE/Vr.4.'VO r,4r6 0,Q,41iV4GE .A45E�lE1Vr.45 .syOwrV DIV rA-e.4/V/YE.1'EO .4f' WE HEREBY RESERVE TO OURS'EL YES, D!/R A/E/RS .41VD 4551 6&S CEPIA/i✓ BR/✓,4TL� A4,4/NAGE E45EME�V r5 4S DEL1&e4- TE0 QN 54/D M,4P OWNERS: RANCHO ASSOCIATES, LTD., A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY: WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO., A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, ( PARTNER OF RANCHO ASSOCIATES , LTD. ) C7m, BY GEJE 0, TO SEND, ( PARTNER OF WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO.) �+ GEORG9 0. TOWNSEND �� RN.,4SsOC/4TES 4 C.4L/FQ4N/4 R,Q.QTit/ERSy/P 4S EEiYEF/C/,4.QY TOA OEE,D UNDER OFEO OF TR✓SP.4'ECp.PDEO ''�O'�''� �7 /965 .4S //YST•4UMENlNF� 85- 04077 _ QEF/C'/,4L .S'EC?�2405. ..CNN M.4CKEY, NER L 4 THE B = 6A .SON, 6E/Y G P4,PTNE.Q "w ,qCOC,t BO`VM 4/VD SCf/4C11 rz-R PROI-17 6.44RI/✓G' TRUST.4S BENE - F/C/4,PY 7014 DEED, UNDER' L2F OFTR(.c5T BECORLk�D ✓UL Y /O, /984,45/NSTi4C/MEM ND 6� /G2.�8/ OFF�C/qL REC2�PD5. BY E,QT B SC/� CIYTEf? T.QUSTEE MOT wY .4c.K/vowc.=~A4, ,vr STATE OFCALIFORNIA ) 'S. s . COUNTY OF l ON TH15 // 7//DAY OFF�BR/U,4RY )%4 MMPORE Mt, THE UNDI!WACsNE7D, A NOTARY P0mr- IN AND FM SAID C,-ZW7Y ",0 97;77E, .��rE,c.PEo ?r�BER1 B. �1 NC11WAW,9,WN 7V ME 7P" .4 TRUSTEE OF T//E TRUST Tf/.4 T E,YECUTEO T•NE /N%T/I/N INSTRUMENT, KND`t/N TD ME TD BE Tx/ELERSGtN /Y,�EXECUlEO T.�/Ew/lN/N /NST,4UMENl ONBEf1,4GFOF TX/E T.�/E�'E/N N.4ME0 T,QUST, A/VOgC•t'NDiVLE06ED TO ME 7,-1147 SUC.-/ TRI -IS T EXECUTED TNF I t�/T.y/N /N,STf�UMENT ,45 BENEF/C/4RY PURSUANT TO /TS 8Y44N/S 0q t1 RESOLUT/01V OF /TS e04,PD OFO/rQEC,T0.4'.S WITNESS M✓ .A1,9MP ,"A9 0,o'W1e'10L sE,oL . • r NOT.vQY 11vsL/C /N RMP AW fA/o coddrY,*NO A/y LOA/A//SS/ON E,f'P/SES . PP AVM,?Y ,Q. A�iNOK/LEA56E 1C- t -? 57,41,2c.01- C4L/fGJPN/A_ -(54 oFLQS 4NGcLES a,y FEBR!/gRY /ir'f' /9b5 QEFGRE Mc; Tf,�EUr✓OER. S/lD, .4/YG. A. .l' , -'g 11C /N .4ND ,AOR .S4/0 Ci,4RY -14Ct-50/Y A/VO ./5;.4/N ,WCAEY �E�PSo7I/gLLy ,�NOAwNTO ME lcur F>�GvEo rG ME avr,�E�os/SOF-�4T/S F4CTORl� E{'/DENCEJ ,'DBE T,•�E �ERSQ/YS Tf�.47 EXECU�EQ T/�E !t//lf//N /NST,QU/'�ENT 45 44NE 6'ENE.P4L P4RlNE.PS O,'1' BGH�JLFDF/R,�/ .45SOC/gTEs, THE PARrNERSH/P rAERE/N N,4ME!' 4A;l .4-t1Y0,WZ El �6� ', rG �fE Tti!Q/ TSE F�aRrNE.�sNiPEXECUr_ : ^ AS N/TiYEff A1YW,%VP, (R officlRZ JL fA D S of - so fso 37 �4 S #V,r,qA'y P(1,AdlC /N RwI/O fd,Q fid/O ,4N0 STATE MY fOMM/fS/O.✓ \ �CgLLE INDEX AND 11/CA117 Y Moo /"r 200' x(100 xvqAlw SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS TRACT NQ 10035 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BEING A-"XJWIVIG)ON OF A R7R1-IGN OF LOIT5 7 AND 13, RED H ILL SUBDIVISION AS PER MAP RE-C,0R 0 1N 600K 21, PAGe'93 OF MA,P5 AND LOT 10, TRACT N9-30(,9 AS PER MAP RMOROED IN 1500K 42 PAC,, --5 CA')AND700,c 4,05,414 RECORDS 01-Tf1E CGY/NTY ac 541V SAWFar C4L/FORN/.4. CiEOROE H /►I/M A14C•" MAY 1981 CONSUL 7IN6 CIVIZ ENGINFERS ONT4R/O, CAL /XC-D�'N/,4 t.'N&NECR'S CERTIFICATE T 6E0K-Af / 1*1/A1M4CK , HEREdY cemFY THAT I AM A Re&IsrERtD CIVIL ENGINEER OF THC STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THAT TH15 MAP CON51STI NG OF TWP-E. 5FIECT5 15 A TRUC AND COMPLETE RtPRE5CNTATI0N OF A 5URVEY MADE UNDtR MY 51.1r'ERV151ON IN QCT. /984 , AND THAT ALL M61SIUMENT5 SHOWN HEREON ARE OF THe CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE rC?',ITION5 INDICATED, OR WILL Oe SST I N SUGH R�-�pI TI ON5 ON OR COMPLIANCE W i TH BECT I ON g (W,413 cj AND G449(o Or THE SUbDIVISON MAPACT AND ARE OR WILL DE SUFFICIENT TOCNADLE TIAESURVE`( TO DC RCTRACCD.�'L - DWiDD Fe,6. 81 rSB5 �� W, Vl 5 ED IVIL . CITY eN&NEERt3 GERTIFiGATE I HCRCCY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE MAP, AND THAT THE 5U501V1510N SHOWN THEREON 10 SIJD'3TANTIALLY -HE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVC MAP AND ANY ArrROVED ALTCRATION5 THEREON AND THAT ALL THE PROVi5iON5 OF THE SUCDIV1510H MAP' ACT AND T�/EC/,Tr' T/!/SN4%: icy/✓,Y�;,1 i :r;r,'E'! LC'IY, /✓;;-+ s , �.�y4s fv/ Or"k.±NC/✓0 3:2�, b5 c� OATCD: by: LL GJ ENGIN CCR CITY PLANNING COMMISSION'S CEjtTtFic.ATE /N=rs�t�y !=h', ;;� �' ;i✓.;,' ,;'r SUB��.6:.:/-%N �7/vN ON,'f✓E./iYN�� �"!� M.�P,:S ,iV �5✓B.Srq/V- T/a� CC; yr"%?/►1. �, ti :: !Y/i:y , r1= 'iv/; 9T/G = , �1:IF' 4f�'i ✓I� y �� .�1. A. ">: i �, G JFINc OG �i/b.1,, ,0 C'i hM.,�•5, i 1 2� , %�_ . ;i /� JFi•�,.r� ►'C r/ � C ✓Gf%/tiE^NG.a C (i�'i.1/tY 7r : 5,4/ v .��i�/4:.�r?vi�vG sr,4lE fir J.�c 25TM t%.;/ cw-' hi�►RC /� / - DATED' 3�� � � G> � ��•'� _ ✓lJi ;� L4r ScC,ti'Er,4rc r, r �.4n,. ✓., vGC� �%, �,/.�:5/JN C/TY /?�'r�•4NC.�.�� CUC.4/�i�N(iA SIGNATURE.` OMISSIONS THE SIGNATURE OF ISIAS W. WILLMAN, THC RECORD OWNER OF THE CAGEMENT YOR POLELIN" AND INCIDENTAL PU,PPOlG`S A9 GRANTED DY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN 80OK K, PAGE e25) OF DVe09 HAS LEEN OMITTtD PURSUANT TO TNe PROVi$ION S, Or 5EGTION G443(i (C), (/) OF 7,71E IU�O/I//S/Oi✓il/APACT. /7S INTEREST CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE. 5AID EASEMENT CANNOT Oe i-OCATED OF RECORD THE SIGNATLIRC OF ONTARIO POWER CONIrANY THE RtCAOWD OWNER OF THt EA5EMENT FOR PGl E-INE5 AND FNCIDENTAL PJR t>5e5 A5 GRANTED Cr( IN5TRJMENT RCCORDCO APRIL It, IW5 IN 500K 359, F*&C 3) OF DEEDS HA5 BEEN OMITt-ED PJRSUANT TO THE PROVIETION15OF 5C :TION (.i.43c, (C),(/) Of7Jl/E BUDOIVISION MAP ACT rT5 INTEREST CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE. SAID EA:,EMEISIT CANNOT- DE L.00ATCD OF RECORD. THE 51G4'4ATLJRe OP THE CJCAMONGA IN VESTMENT COMPANY AND THE CUCAMONGA WATERCOMPANY THE RECORD OWNeR OF THE EASEMENT FOR FO�E LINE'9 AND INCIDENTAL PUPJ"09E9 A5 GRANTCD CIY IIVgTRUMENT RECORDCD OCTOCCR 5, 1925 IN BOOk 804, PAGE; 280 OF DeeV5 HAS BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SM TION GG43(.. (C), OF 7WF t!/mIx1f/!•W Azwv feT. /7Y /NTGREST 4wwr RIPEN INTO A PEE. SAID CASC'MENT CANNOT CSC LOCATCD OF KCGORO. THE S1"ATJRE OF THE .9OJTNERN CALIFORNIA sDI50N COMPANY RECORD OWNER OF THE EASCM154r rOR POLU✓ L.INE5 AND INCIDENTAL PJRr0.9C5 A5 &RANTeP 15Y IN5TRJMBNT REc.ORDCO IN COOK 20&'), ^&e 153, OPFICIAL RECORDS HAS DEEN OMWI'nT;D PURSLANT TO 71+E PROVISIONS OF 5CGTION Cdi404, (c), (/) OF THE SUDDIVISION MAP ACT IT5 INTEREST CANNOT RIrCN INTO FCC RANCHO CUCAMIONGA CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATE I HEREDY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNGL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, VYA MOTION DULY 5E-CONDCD AND P/669ED, ARROVED TNt ATTACHED MAP ON - Ht-ZQ'MDAYOF MARCH , M&L AND ACCtPTED FOR rUDLIC USE THE THEREIN OPFCRtD, ANO I ti(E.FESY .0tC'EoT ON J;5lA6.0 OF T,NE' G/TY Of ZRAI.C/✓O C!/QOMON6.q TJKB 5m~ Am// EArSE,NENr, IL/f /PE✓ECT Tf✓E 411 E" OFGiED/C4 -/ON. Li07L�0 / y� E /T «GC cirY a- "wvcvo caO'fA4x~ ey: (T/TLE) AUOITOR'S C6RTIFICATt I HCRCDY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RCGORQ50F T141S 010MCE A43 OF THIS DATE T"eAe ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE REAL r1WMKTY SHOWN UrON THE ANNEXED MAP FOR UNPAID-3TKT>C,COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXb+ OR SPECIAL A"1555MENT7 ^� LECTCD AS TAXES. OZ rT TAXCh GR WWA,L AOW.;-r CNT5 NOT YET rAYACLG, FcnMATED Tib 8C * G' va DD DATL`D7 1 ERROL J. MACKZUM, COUNTY AUDITOR COUNTY OF SAN MO"RDINO, CAU FORK A OY• ,o�ruTY WARD OF SUMItVI'5OR5 CeRT1FICATI< I WERCDY GCQTIrY THAT A 150WO IN THC eUM Or #!! 010- 0406 MEJ CXC 4nW ANO MILD WITH TW, 60UV OP 6UPCRV15OR5 OP T4E. COUNTY Or SW Ctg"Kowo, U'TATC Or G►LArORNIAI, C4NDiT10NCD umw TUC rAYMGIT OF ALL TAX156, STATE., COUNT`(, MUNIC -AL CK LWAA-, AW ALL OfRW 4- A 6 %w -N%, WLL,I!CfW A& Ti1�M, MMIC!! AT 'THE TIME. OF THE MLING OF T11C ANNCXCD MAP WITH TMC COUNTY RGGGRM ARC A Lfik A"WiT MOD 1'RDPG9TY, CUT NOT YET PAYAtIZ AND THAT THC SUOOIVIOCIR HAh MLCD WITH MG A CtMMMCATC Off THD PR'>MA OFrIC-eK CGIVINC4 1419 ESTIMATE OF THE AMOUNT OF !>AIO 1Xft AND A46155i8MGIT'S, AMD 91W- eaw ~ OJ DULY Armov fJ by SAID Damp Or aumi VI 5 / I / DATE. M4RT//,4 M. SEk'ERq,I' CLE,P,� CJS T.yE Bt24RD DFSUP64✓/Sl;�s, QOrf,/E CGY/NTY G�'.SidNBE.�PN.4,tP0/iV0 BY. QF�Y/rr il/E 67/6N47URE 04'457s06^1,4 TE0 TELEOfrONE COMP4NY OWNERS OF 4N E.4 MENt FGi4 rELEO,vOr1i� L/NES RECORDED ON JULY /7, /947 /N BGOA' 20G B, P,4GE "7 QR /TS //YrEREST (X1YrV01rR/PEN INTO 4 FEE. TWE 516/14TURE DF SO'irr/ER/v C4Z11' ,I'N/,4 ED/SON CD/YP41VY Tf/ERECORO 0A1NE,QOF.4/V EASE /TIENT FGi4 ECECTR/C L/NES GYY 1f4,QCf/ 6, /9(1•? INBGt2K "4.4- 10,4GE//7 O.R Lor �ryvk%✓ F, .ClrC/ T,'/EP•4EC.'SE •SES/G�t' 4,,1 � PLgC'EME�vT DF,4LL STR!/C;T;/.PES :i/V qLL LGA `V/Ty/N rH.'5 SUB01)"510.41 5,�I LL BE COMMITTEE OF T,�/E Ci �Y OF �P,4Ncs✓D lU<,DMC vG,4 Rf?�Q4' r0 lyE /S.SU,4/►�'E OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ON THIS THE 6 TH DAY OF MARCH, 1985, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONA,LY APPEARED GEORGE 0. TOWNSEND PERSONA! LY KNOWN TO ME TO BE ONE OF THE PARTNERS OF WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO., A PARTNERSHIP, SAID PARTNERSHIP BEING KNOWN TO ME TO BE ONE OF THE PARTNERS OF RANCHO ASSOCIATES, LTD., A PARTNERSHIP, THE PARTNERSHIP THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME AS PARTNER OF THE PARTNERSHIP FIRST ABOVE NAMED, THAT SAID PARTNERSHIP FIRST ABOVE NAMED EXECUTED THE SAME AS A PARTNER OF RANCHO ASSOCIATES, LTD., AND THAT SAID NAMED PARTNERSHIP EXECUTED THE SAME, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. L S�' CA""6 A. ;'A (/ Y S " INP G nwn S,x NOTARY PUBLIC 174/3 3 x35 Page 281 TRACT N0. 10035 IM THE C/TY OF RAV490 Cl144MONGA, G41./FORKAR AE/N6 'f fb60/1//f/OPV Of A PORT/ON OF L,OTf 7.4W.0 /., REO 11144 tL/QO/l//.f/OA/ Af I A' /1/AP ,PECAQOEO /A/ SwAo, Z/, PA6E if OF MAPS ,oww LOT m,, mwCT A/0..f046P Af /f,P MOO RE60ROf0 /.t/ ,&Mlle 4ZIPf6Ef G' �4.V0 70 OFM,4PS 4LL, RECORDS Gig r,4156E C2�UrvlY OF S4/V BER/V.4/?O/VO, SlgTEO�CgL/FOR/V/.4. Fo ,,. rCS 0..�,�......_..........._.. - ........""•• GEORGE 17e SCALE : /"'-Lo' MAY, ifs/ A '• /rL0/' ,g•/•S'/,Z ENULT/NGCv/cNG iNEEPCOS GS3/��nONTAR/0, C4L/r GR/V/.46f y 41 RED ALL io COLIA, se �"w 71/1 41 • fS7.i�L/r,✓EO Ar TX/E W Z Y AMW400WY L/iV'6 ,,pp : • h Of M. A ® yD �,5'EASEMENT TO 45SOG/4TEp TELEAr/ONE CO. V Q� �1 �i �^� •� FOR POLE L/NES PER L1EE0 RECQ4LiE"D /NBK n Z04d, P6.997 QR oa !1 :' L073� s�iG ��� LO•� Al 7f01% �yi T� \ er7A* f6/I,VEOA.f 7M a .S• EY.Y !Ar/NOA,PY OF L073• �/ 5 G/ •L6 Z�T 1b !, v 7R.i�T �✓O..f04f, A/.Q. <Z1-6 70 •. o� co EiOft��t11. IN F.v /I M 7iD/L /O " " f0. Z /.P. T,Q66E0 L.f.3A�Z. ,vo,r ,v«Eireo E ,tea T,f iissAtf4fqa/Ts7�t ..,_..... 1 -3.�� mor �o� urr cfT.....,, a b 75•Z,( s!"E. 44f.19' 1zft' 7Z.QG' �/ Z695?7' 1 (Z70.00' 4Z/G9-76 / l/y'0 0 i"" 7.RlGEO.7C.!/,it!",IT..-•••' 9G. �; � /Sf.7 � —; -.fQ 3.d 10.04,$!5 t7`�4 �► � po ' `� !AY et. fora Aw m JV47 a '� �8• - l 3� e_ AdE 4W/4f-,V CftUj ,VI b.�� �ppl' \� j k ms' Zoo e .� � N72/029rV-� z - a aa.r�„ SVA I / �4t-Sly-` l y: o �y �a 4.150' NlrO/S2L'E w "N07'd741A � v5 / AG n` \4'ES14fro AS -W /V.4TE S S� `"` .—��" - '° \ PRrE DRe61� <ESM710 AW - O�M� rel. CO. FOR POLE Z- oRai Kpo'�ESMI.TEC. CO. G� Jf L/NES PER Z EEO Z� fo. Hi'io 7MW Ys/Ar `a \ f� `" EDR RALE L/NEe AEC: /Nat' 2148" 21 f 9q c- (� /,Fr sf dK Zffl,' /16r s.►�iss v 0 N FE,P GEEO SPEC. //v�o oO6 3337 O.R. .1 /,� % MO.. 41444Y. AF t• / �sii d � 0 � : BK. 8 337 0 � r, (SEE L�7 � 3 � �(: i �/ ..� r � a f . t=zas''-- �, h o l7 OR is/. •� \5' �, 1�� toa �' o S ����G ���; o to ,fib �� ,'' !'tayo''r-` o, �`0iti:i3+ 4� V 5b 9 oc \ \ 4`� �t I •S i �I A ♦i ,��3• s 1 • ,O figAso y� [ 1'D• 1'4'9 "'�_ `^.,•` `�iu mai/Q �LDINCa bCTD�G•K LINt .j _X 7 54/V. D/%O /� , D ,/`•, 0 p0)�- 'Q moo- = S• czZa7t' Ga a,/1 R� Q Q� Qti $ �� is /6•;7%1" T .�fl' 11 Mw i P , �' r L• C� � '� Q� � � •!"�• ti �.{�. L=svj' Zrst' fzsi' t�s6.11l1 l ` ��.. �. . o r. S. 76 /s s9 w. /sawn 171? N G �• \ $ l c� eo�0 `. ��, \�i. c C% •'''O. �i?moi d=/7•o/�0" ,t•�oo' �i• �'„�ji, � :Z+ ,�r°% �., r�7o' x•17' A ,�,Z ' 1~ �z"w. Nu 5 Af •27 5" G/.lo' fG.ii' yla9 �. 9 m o IL 10 q k• � b� N V. • v wi. o w w 7 H -fa. t r. / nom, :�►E. 7i+�s " �� 3ti \?P w ti y� o H . p 2' 41B A 1� ire.�ee/rJ �uvs, A/J t+K/nx :.._.••• h hZ \ `� •oI'f 1h ` \ �� Gir ��'►�//�tjo~p, 70L1E0/GATE 4N a►\ ,� 10 ,vim'` EASEMENT •�� � j•�4i��i. � ?r Q4 FGi4 AP4//✓•46E \t \ IlAf ~29, C5f ADl.15NMtjJT NOW GN LOT 15, MW NII.L � •s'S p�•h, N � \I 1 wgavwcN NoIw ieNT Nor R'JIAJO. UOC� ���. �,�� B�•S•�• I Plx Wv N+u �tJlly+ '.iANioD�t, µD Z► RZKato ArJ6itcoA40 �� �� sS � ?car• MYI.AR COPY R __.q 7 --ft �?Op� �oio. per, D=Or09'00" R=1�1^,4�MJ�.19' L • 50 fo.<"/./...iZ5"A1if1ZY....................... A f�P4M ,fA/ PE,P r�•Go/, P'.00. W&W ,00 N �•�� A- d16'co• �'I°� R• O 72.40'"' ��` L• 3b.cn• . I � ' bCr I vz , b • a5' N w'L-�f or 4L IWCAeb, LAW FOR LIW_ ONLY V �Qa 60" ;A 0 2'1 00 �. R' 3819.'I�✓' ' L- W OV or #vp ,Z� 015 oRv Em 4 VAR/ES W/7,qL0C,4r/ON Copp ,r\ °' 4',64 EME/Y! 70 2•� __,30 AEE T /N ASSOC/4TEO TEC. / , �LEN6TN .. fo. 2"/.P. sET /,V �oNc to. ICW RALE UrvES G " &PAWW., ACGC,PrW A5 6N/ PER OEEO REC. /N MOLD Vr10 v 0p zyrme&r BK e'W B, iG 337U�4 --I LA Z 0" Wr 7, M.6 2//33 'rr[.ds/gJ 50 CAL. EO/SON PER //VSTRUMENT U ,*-M0RDEO 7/2//47 /NBGiOK aX9,.6./S.3 TYR/CAL EA SENENT OEM /L /'/ ` ` O ' R S!/EE T 2 OF i fiVEETs a r• -SO. C,i'�lJi. Ci�/lO,V CD. 6p1'E frVT AW ,1WM2'1/skWN7; AW 7 /47 IW Ar 104P, oV. A�n'. MJ O� DE;rl4/L "A" i/0 SCAL E Sc#10 : /"=60' MMES: c nv.- ,ems Amma of msT.os svpw,v FOR me S'LY f&wWAffY L/MC OF 7, Wr NO. 47-17, M.B. BS/S03/ AVIW [/LEO Af Me AfWlf OF SE•O�P/A/6f "ViC Ti�//,S' "IV. Z. • MONL1,veV7X f0!/NOAf NOMP. j, o /w0/,-,47rS /"l P. ApGE. 9399, zwzeof 407AC,9fW1!re MPMW SMS ,CeVXr M" P,ffPAWR AYAC7,7•W EN61MMeN6 4V,0!/4JWh'$, O,QTc'�O AU6dfT 27, /SBO, ,31" AM 4e A If 4 e.. /"P/. f Tl//S M.Wr AW 38 LOrf, AMO /5.725 AZ.lLS 4. vile. /ND/C,gTES Az/At/C' UT/L/TY 6wFAfEMT. 7 C.S.M. /NO/C.VMf eWIV7Y f!/WWYOAS' /A;.NZ1A0'4 VT.- 7 CSAA f /NO/447Ef OO!/NTY tel"4EYO, 5r f/ELO A40W. 9 jz AYD/,ATEs /" /.P. SET //4"EELO/(/ s.'mr,QCE, N//TJi/ T/ES, 7WS6Eo ,fee 9399. ' /D. x /MO/44TES G "Aafr SET /'W /. M. AMO /VAr"of, W177/ r/", T,v"Eo 'ree. 93 Qp /,✓o/c rag 1"/. P .ser lfLl/fwj *Wp 7A" v ,rc. E. 9399. /t. ( ) A. -MRO AW70 (Ag NOM -D) /3. CC.`!/O. /ND/C4rES C444HaV64 COUNTY WAr_-R O/STV/Cr 6 Page 282 0 W h TRACT NO,, 10035 #1 rMs C/TY w /sAaIWO �Y/C�QMON6A, CAL IFMM1,A ro.1'c.s.M. � "IM46 RI .f!/t6%I//.S'/ON OF .4 ,q 710A/ OF LOTS 7 AMP /j, .PED 1//LL SU60////S/O,t/ c•tflb' 273/5-7'' �Rf �,! AIAP �Es�O/POEO /N A00,� I/, R�6E j3 Of A4RlPS, .4N0 LOT /O, T,i�R7CT 1► OOUNTRY 4LU6 NP JW6-v AT /E.q MAR RE•�ClMROEO /N 804,(' ¢Z, P�OGES `9 .giVO 70, 0,rAMPS � p N y L �o� AP/VE o .ALL AMOR405 Qr TMf C4V1W7Y 04C S'4N �E�P/1�4/;'O/NO, STAlE A�C,DL /PORN/•4 . R / � � «, GEORGE NA04fAMCff— GLvT4R/Q CWZ1,r RN/.4 ,S�G NSA G5 G \ 39 s op y2 CAPER --, rJ \ b �� d d�� o t�• ERE S •� � s z►I , . �' � E N FOR rtD � pls�����. � E�Ev\;•. , `°�', EASE \ .30'�pdsf��� Pd ld1Ey �� �E��Str/ JI �• ll� ' , 8 • I 1 t0 / F 00 00 � 0 A11.1 E4�EMEN/ rc.= `y 1. rkk too E 4 OI I; Jo rr�.aEs �s�c 1 �, �Q� •g, fE 6 4 d• ;'� 2�' �' Z a ti JL r4/L / \ 1 0* A1�339 AS`s , ��, 5•x'1 4 ,.` p RFr. ` 2? /` r \ �r e (,'EASEMENT f0_� j 50&,rivE9N \ Ate` DI �I s FD. A"Z-A4Vf,, N07AW � �y1R �A �9 moi. � � M1j .004E L NO 10661c, $9' 9r. - 28 `? �/ Bk 5BG 5, R5c //74�PI j;!: \ °b �► fo. /"ilr 7,4�Eo'v.s2srf" �i uc�w iorav - I. �._, &°v¢s'/iz�'E p���`'000?a'r" NO fEf, A�C'CE/TE/ Af IOI., ) 31 Z/.57 n, '40 Iia / Pf [07s f f i t .� ,'�' 31' PR/d4TE .i- �s� , ' �. o .10 .a. �-r /YI/SN) h X45 1 4'� M * s3. d o R:SZ.< r,. 01 �'[ 4Q $�' �\ 0RR,4lV,46E 0 ''�29" k0� td q,`'s_ a.�Z 14 .o<'ESMr7045SOC/,4TED yfo �,�✓ %S! .p /f0 71 4d p A55 I 7EY. Coo. FOR GE L/NES Ittµ,.tl�1. '�v 5�1• �E�.��D�R �%�j /e Q N \� \ Y • PER DEED RE IN A6J'r Z V /N !� Q E p y gK �; Seg• �. \ • 2C1:B,R5 937\� IAlEE SIN SND R.sa.r/'. p R 33 P6• w j 9. �u✓,). i �/ /ss OC .x'09` sfr•yco"�'' /vz:c' Q0 / o o H Q ti3 O ^ 5 tl • I /C W. '� \ i b h bu1L(71Wx •� L * itlS� '`� V �4 =//5' Z4f °ttj 7"- Z/. f1 ti 15' �L �Z. dS' \ .\ �� r e=/•rlsa•' LINE •';I �1 r=risz]nf' J� w � [ • tx �e • ZI;., '♦oso' L=iao�' i L =rte sG' T=/s...n' �O dz Ic_ o \ 4.1.�•S?• C • 49 '61 . /6' Rs/i!O' L•/!/.K' T•!f�/' S.GZ•/7l9"AV /G/.f0 L ZISL' 9 27 � .70' D S-il•/7'If"M! 4 {S fZ �„ 4B� Mv�d \ 4\ / vL M !" r' ��o`;, ssz•�7>:s"w. r-ssoi' _ soG.so \ � � f 3i'15 ti•(!� _ S `Z•/7' ..� �?tp s. � � \� /.Yid �- � +� r•y` ` w R = L f /isso' _7-1- 740' -AAA L ZOB.36'zz ' ,p�/100 d.f1•/7:/ N! Z77. � "i _ _ _ o 4 °a<'El •,G„'� s. !�'i5 _ ,/`. ,�: /�10' L • /I/ /f' T= !a x' s sz./7 3Z �, L •ii' \ 7,/� /Itdl�?7l.ZO' S7.ss' d=3 �>� ��'.' R��'ft- �b�K. xter�K u,''r //2.LG' . Q ft / d r I.55'Is' GI.IZ' z N dL' B2. iG' • L • to./1' n IRS' [ = r \ z N •� Ni L:77a _ 4 ps %Z• ---� �7 C •9�c o ' 4r '177.'1D �� Rj?/10 \ � L=0.I � � t• o _ a. O -� `" ►. � H h .�. stir,, '�'+ L s S•jl 1 3a ' �Q 1 �^ qlV �h Qb H •OLS 0� \ell �•`�3`�- r V L=Z/3.id' f•1Z I _ �"-tt lslp • G, 4Zov 19/41 /7 It �o6oj Ilk 4do �1I+�1 Q b ti N ti 3 ►t h � Z ? �'� � � tib b��� � Z � � ••� 17 0 1/ 0 41 V • V RrZlpf♦ LrIy9 Zr apps• e=/•/Zs�" 3'N L=�R75' L`Gw.!/' ___ /. G.6f BOA/' BQO/' 5100' Ef.On' 1' /.iZGi7' a¢' " ,Ili Vi � W 4141 •/9'/3"E. a r 0 t700 .frl7S''1.15_— t� - —�, 4 * D'o9 o0".Q= // Y9. /'' •••• &5-meL/lNEO As 7wdr A!N/'LY [ /NE OF AA17,11 W AVezow/G /fV/Z~,p /fMA17" Of L = ZXf,I' 7, /x.76 b ' b 1 � L = Z� y<' T' /�•JZ' � 1. -- e=17•451oo„ Q : ,� o .� M SOUTJVEQI/ Pi4C/F/C �fW1Z,0FWP .Q/6,�/T 4f. /� Ip/ � �'2844.a�jA•O'27'GY�' �` �IQ K=o 09cv / �'a61.51' R='X519?� '� •....V� �•4'YJ�i9 h cc, L4 ZVWX AW lS. ArIW AV X/99 54gLE : /~=GO MYLAR COPY SHEET -5 OF S SHMT5 Ile oil PR/VATE DRQ/NAGE EASEMENT �� w � l 27 26 ZIET4/L 5,raRN ORWA/ EASEMENT SCALE•' /1FI40 f0. it T. Def r,P. 4777 S/SO-S/ \F� o41q,,, 1✓ S. T /E.f 7X 46"76 'EASEME/VT TO S.C.E. CO. M. a es/so;�/ FQR POLE L/NES PER B•t' r \�ti If 20.00 \\ 5ZG5, EG. //7 O.R. 000, OF,Q4NC/,/O COC41VO14164 FLA? D` 10", /\1z1 `\ \ G6T4/CON ROPE/4Ty 9 / 40' ,o ��,e�°\ \ LOT 5, RED HILI_ Tom\ \ / SUBDIVISION, M.B. 21/33 ..- 4sw AMP .............FO. /yi"/.R 7A66E0 "L.SIISZ" 4-y ACCEPTED .vf sLY coo fV,4 2/ \ f.Q' T� G 717, M.S. /S/ f0-fY A90 O 1 Do 2 s Page 283 ` l EASEMENT TO C/1YOF,4,4N1ND C&C4WON6.4 AW STORNOR..4/N ZIET4/L 5,raRN ORWA/ EASEMENT SCALE•' /1FI40 f0. it T. Def r,P. 4777 S/SO-S/ \F� o41q,,, 1✓ S. T /E.f 7X 46"76 'EASEME/VT TO S.C.E. CO. M. a es/so;�/ FQR POLE L/NES PER B•t' r \�ti If 20.00 \\ 5ZG5, EG. //7 O.R. 000, OF,Q4NC/,/O COC41VO14164 FLA? D` 10", /\1z1 `\ \ G6T4/CON ROPE/4Ty 9 / 40' ,o ��,e�°\ \ LOT 5, RED HILI_ Tom\ \ / SUBDIVISION, M.B. 21/33 ..- 4sw AMP .............FO. /yi"/.R 7A66E0 "L.SIISZ" 4-y ACCEPTED .vf sLY coo fV,4 2/ \ f.Q' T� G 717, M.S. /S/ f0-fY A90 O 1 Do 2 s Page 283 DATE: TO: FROM: INITIATED BY: SUBJECT: February 19, 2020 Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager Donny Mahoney, Police Chief SUMMARY OF PUBLIC SAFETY RESPONSE TO 2019 HOLIDAY LIGHTS DISPLAY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 2020 HOLIDAY SEASON. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council receive and file the information presented and provide Staff with direction for the 2020 holiday season. BACKGROUND: For more than 20 years the residents of Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets have created a visual display of lights during the weeks leading up to Christmas. In the beginning, the light displays were more modest and visitors were generally limited to city residents or residents of surrounding cities. With the advent of social media, the light displays now attract visitors from all over Southern California. In fact, through surveying visitors at the Holiday Lights Display over multiple days during the 2019 holiday season, almost 70% of those surveyed came from zip codes outside of Rancho Cucamonga, compared to 80% in 2018. Although the City provides police and traffic support to manage the crowds and minimize impacts on adjacent neighborhoods, the City has always made it clear that the Holiday Lights Display is not an official City -sponsored event. The large crowds create significant public safety and community concerns. Multiple departments are impacted; the Police, Engineering Services, and Public Works Services Departments along with the City Manager's Office collaborate each year to provide a high level of specialty services to mitigate these impacts and elevate the safety of the residents and visitors, which is quite costly. Key findings from past years include: • Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets and Turquoise Avenue are narrow, two-lane residential streets with no sidewalks and are not intended to handle substantial amounts of vehicular or pedestrian traffic. • Traffic counts demonstrate a startling number of pedestrians and vehicles, more than 5,000 pedestrians and a 93% increase in vehicular traffic on a weekend night, which creates a dangerous situation for pedestrians and motorists. • Pedestrians, including children, are routinely observed traversing back and forth across the street in between vehicles. At the same time, drivers are distracted by the holiday displays. • Residents in the surrounding neighborhoods experience significant inconveniences from the large volume of visitors such as illegal parking, blocking driveways, litter and human excrement in their yards, vandalism, trespassing, noise and the extreme delays in ingress and egress into their residential neighborhoods. Page 302 In response to these significant concerns, the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (RCPD) recommended that the City transition the Holiday Lights Display into a Drive-Thru Only experience by limiting pedestrian traffic during peak times. At its March 15, 2017 meeting, the City Council held an Administrative hearing to receive public testimony regarding the consideration to transition. The City Council voted 5-0 to give staff direction to move forward with this option and ultimately adopted Ordinance No. 904 adding Section 10.40.040 to RCMC "Regarding Violations of Temporary Street Closures." For the 2019 holiday season, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-029 at its May 15, 2019 meeting, temporarily closing portions of Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets to pedestrians during peak times of the area's Holiday Lights Display. Peak times included December 6-8 and December 13-24, 2019 from 5:00pm to 11:00pm. These peak times were identified due to unsafe conditions that have been observed in the past. Residents of the homes on the affected streets and their guests continue to be exempt and are able to access the display area on foot or by vehicle. ANALYSIS: For the third year in a row, RCPD successfully implemented the Drive-Thru Only Ordinance. Overall, the implementation went smoothly and the changes were again well received by the area residents. In comparing vehicle traffic on the weekend before Christmas between 2019 and 2018 holiday seasons, typically the most congested, there was a 13% reduction in overall traffic in the area, with traffic on Sapphire Street leading up to Thoroughbred Street down by 24% from the previous year. In 2019, pedestrian counts were also completed to gain a better understanding of pedestrian numbers and patterns occurring on the days during the Holiday Lights Display when both pedestrians and vehicle traffic are allowed. During the first weekend, which occurred the three days directly after the Thanksgiving Holiday and the only weekend available for pedestrians, a total of 579 pedestrians were counted. The first full week of the display saw 2,133 pedestrians total with Thursday, December 5th registering 1,314 of that total number. During the final full week allowing pedestrian traffic, it is estimated that about 11,000 pedestrians visited the light display with Thursday, December 12th bringing in 6,452 of the total number for the week. During the months leading up to the holiday season, RCPD and the City's Community Affairs Division executed a communications strategy in order to educate the public regarding the regulations set for the 2019 holiday season. Efforts included community meetings, information mailings, video announcements, and social media posts. Electronic message board signs were strategically placed in the area of the holiday lights display announcing the pedestrian restrictions. The City's holiday lights webpage was visited by 22,622 unique visitors over the November and December 2019 months. Two community meetings were held, one specifically for decorators and one for the general public, and both had low attendance (10 participants at the decorator meeting, 13 participants at the general public meeting) compared to the past two years. RCPD also worked with DoIT (the City's Department of Innovation and Technology) to again deploy the online event registration portal, allowing residents within the affected area to register their parties/get- togethers so that their guests can be allowed through the deputy -staffed check-in areas. During the 2019 holiday season, residents within the affected area registered 189 parties/get-togethers during the Drive-Thru Only period. With the Drive-Thru Only transition proving to be an effective strategy in reducing the unsafe conditions and the negative impacts on the surrounding area residents, RCPD is recommending that it again be implemented for the 2020 holiday season. As in 2019, the Drive -Through Only Ordinance would be implemented for a two-week period prior to Christmas, December 11 to December 24, 2020 as well as the weekend of December 4 to December 6, 2020. This would allow both pedestrians and vehicles for 7 days in December (December 1-3 and December 7-10). It is also recommended that due to low participation at both community meetings that Council direct staff to eliminate these meetings going Page 303 forward. Staff is seeking City Council direction regarding these recommendations. Based on Council's direction, staff will bring back an updated resolution designating the Drive-Thru Only dates at a subsequent City Council meeting for the Council's adoption. FISCAL IMPACT: In order to properly staff their response, RCPD utilized approximately 1,975 hours in sworn personnel. The estimated final cost for RCPD's response in 2019 is approximately $132,452. It is anticipated that costs for the 2020 holiday season will be similar. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses City Council Goal PUBLIC SAFETY: Transitioning to a Drive-Thru Only experience addresses the critical public safety concerns previously identified. Page 304 Response to 2019 Holiday Lights Display &Recommendations for 2020 Holiday Season Background • In February 2019, City Council held a public hearing to consider continuing aDrive-Thru ordinance for the Thoroughbred Holiday Lights display • In May 2019, City Council took action: • Established Drive-Thru Only on December 6-8 & 13-24 from 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. Pedestrians were allowed to walk the loop from November 29-December5 and December 9-12. 9 City Resolution 19-029, May 15, 2019 Findings: • Thoroughbred and Jennet are narrow streets with no sidewalks • Traffic counts confirm a significant public safety concern • Pedestrians are intermingled with vehicles +driver are distracted by light display • Neighborhood Impacts: trash, vandalism, illegal parking, trespassing, traffic, etc. In Preparation of Drive-Thru Transition: • Two neighborhood/community meetings held prior to the start on December 6th • Both had little attendance • Deployment Plan developed by RCPD • Aggressive communications strategy • Mechanism to allow access for residents' guests through a phone application. Guest Registry Porta • Dolt (City's Department of Innovation and Technology) developed an online guest registry portal for the periods of Drive-Thru only • Residents instructed on how to use the portal • Over 180 events registered throughout the month of December • Effective tool in assisting deputies to determine appropriate pedestrian access into the loop • No complaints reported RC Event Registration Portions of Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets and Turquoise Avenue will be drive-thru only from December 6th through December 8th and December 13th through December 24th between 5-11 PM. If you live within the affected area and are having guests, please register your event in order to ensure your guests can access your home as a pedestrian. a s „ Event Registration Area 3 r I r �� Community Outreach Efforts 22,622 Unique Website Visitors (30% reduction) Thoroughbred PSA Video Facebook: 35,975 people reached Twitter: 10,730 people reached Instagram: 4,714 people reached Rancho Cucamonga Police Department November 28, 2019 - o The Holiday Lg Its are aWays a big hit here in the cRy. You may walk through the area December 1-5 and from December 312. Otherwise, d is drive-thru only. We encourage everyone to follow the rules, obey traffic laws and most importantly, have a great timer #RCCommUNIT1('visicn4safety Rancho Cucamonga Police Department November12,2019 Q The Holiday Lights are always a big nil herein the city. You may walk thrcugh the area December 1-5 and from December 9-12. Otherwise, it is drive -thin only We encourage everyone to follow the mles, obey trathc laws and most importantly, have a great time' #RCCommUNITY #vlsion4safety Drive-Thru Only Results • Traffic counts showed a decrease during Drive-Thru Only • 13% decrease in overall traffic from the previous year 9000 8000 • 24% decrease on Sapphire Street 7000 a) 6000 E 0 5000 • Traffic flow remained the same as T 4000 2018 3000 2000 • An average loop time of 25 1000 minutes 0 • An average time of 1 hours and 10 minutes from Sapphire and Banyan to the exit of the loop ADT Sapphire LL 7 LL 7 LL N 7 LL 7 LL J0, 7 ci N N N N N M N N N Y N v a°1i v v v v a°Ji v v v v 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 X X X ■ 2016 ■ 2017 .2018 ■ 2019 Drive-Thru Only Results Pedestrian Counts: • 2019 Implementation of pedestrian counts • First weekend directly after Thanksgiving 579 pedestrians counted • First full week of the display (Dec 2-5) 2,133 pedestrians counted • Last full week allowing pedestrian traffic (Dec. 9-12) 11,000 pedestrians counted 6,452 pedestrians on last day (Dec 12) Drive-Thru Only Results • Zip codes collected from random sample visitors from December 12-13 • 67% were from outside Rancho Cucamonga • 97 unique zip codes • As far as San Diego & Tulare County, and this year even some out of state visitors Ac An[efope Valley Lancaster Palmdale Santa Clarita I - • 5 a ^.. � Sj.. �" tl Valley - Moun r2 in t', aLorge Sana Monica 4 O .Redondo 9each "'"'�'I rehelm o dl Long fleach nta Ma �C �9 IN 247 nd R6 ;: Penis Hemet t' j Cathedral City t - x�' r'.�t' ' Intllo ' � (( Murrieta Jacin.io 1 A4oL'R?sins e` y' . aOceanside Escondido 5anca'-bO AeSefYdS1°n-- .r t ,rs. ri Drive-Thru Only Results Other Results: • Reduction in Burrtec trash receptacle collection • In 2016 (Prior to drive-thru only) Burrtec collected up to 22.5 tons of trash • 2017-2019; Approximately 5 tons of trash collected, a portion being non-event related (green waste, etc.) • City and police continued to receive positive emails and comments from area residents. Conclusion Data suggests that Drive-Thru Only is: • Making a difference in the neighborhoods • Drastic decline in complaints (phone calls/emails) • Low attendance at neighborhood meetings • Decline in trash collected • Slowly becoming more manageable, less of a major So Cal attraction • Initial decline in out-of-town visitors • Downward trend in number of vehicles Decline in website hits Recommendations for 2020 For the 2020 holiday season, seeking City Council direction to: • Implement Drive-Thru Only December 4-6 and 11- 2412020 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO RECEIVE AND FILE MIDYEAR FINANCIAL UPDATE FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2019. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file the attached Midyear Financial Update for the six month period ended December 31, 2019. BACKGROUND: On a quarterly basis, the Finance Director provides the City Council with a brief update on the budgetary performance of the City's operating funds which include the City General Fund (Fund 001), the Library Fund (Fund 290), and the Fire District Operating Funds (Funds 281, 282, and 283). At the midyear point, staff conducts an analysis of the City operating budget which includes detailed inquiries of the various City departments. During these inquiries, budgetary needs may be identified that require more timely attention than the Amended Budget process may provide. As a result, additional appropriations may be requested of the City Council in conjunction with the Midyear Financial Update. ANALYSIS: The Midyear Financial Update provides budget and year-to-date actuals (including encumbrances) of both revenues and expenditures for the City's operating funds. The City's General Fund is facing some challenges from the revenue side with projected decreases in TOT revenues and very mild growth in sales tax revenues. While development fees and non -abated revenues are projected to end the fiscal year well above the Adopted Budget, much of this growth should not be relied upon to fund on-going expenditures but rather to fund one-time expenditures or to enhance reserves. Personnel vacancies have offset the projected shortfalls in recurring revenues with savings in recurring expenditures. It is recommended that these vacancies be held for the rest of the year to enable the City to absorb anticipated revenue shortfalls and cost increases next fiscal year. During the upcoming FY 2020/21 budget meetings, revenue projections will be reviewed in conjunction with projected cost increases to determine the appropriate course of action for filling the vacancies in the future. The Library Fund's and Fire District Operating Funds budgets for expenditures are performing well as of midyear and are consistent with the prior year, with some enhancements for new Fire District staffing. Generally, revenues are on track or slightly ahead of projections, and expenditures are on track with or slightly below historical norms. The allocation of the Fire District's RPTTF funding will be shifted more Page 305 towards the District's operating funds in the future to fund the annual cost of the new Firefighters. However, the Fire District will still continue to build its capital reserves. Overall, the local economy remains solid with low unemployment rates, good employment growth, and increasing property values. However, the full impact of the Coronavirus outbreak remains to be seen. The resulting decrease in Chinese tourism could impact our TOT revenues, as noted above, sales tax revenues, and even real estate through reduced Chinese investment. Staff will provide updates to Council on this matter as information becomes available. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 -Midyear Financial Update Page 306 City of Rancho Cucamonga Midyear Financial Update Six Month Period Ended December 31, 2019 OVERVIEW n This report summarizes the City's overall financial position for the current fiscal year through December 31, 2019. The focus of this report is the City's operating budget which is comprised of the City General Fund, the Library Fund, and the Fire District Operating Funds. The revenue projections and budgets include necessary adjustments for encumbrances, carryovers, and any supplemental appropriations made by the City Council as of December 31, 2019. GENERALFUND General Fund Financial Condition. With 50% of the year complete, General Fund expenditures are at 46% of projections (compared to 43% the prior year) and revenues are at 31 % (compared to 30% in the prior year). Revenues are typically less during the first half of the fiscal year as a number of the more significant items, including franchise fees and fourth quarter sales tax, are not received until the second half of the fiscal year. Both expenditures and revenues are explained in more detail below. General Fund Budget* YTD Actual* Percent Revenues $ 88,342,795 $ 27,227,452 31% Expenditures $ 89,498,494 $ 41,529,438 46% *Includes carryover purchase orders. The expenditures budget and YTD actual figures above include carryover purchase orders from the prior fiscal year. Excluding the carryover purchase orders, the City adopted a balanced budget for Fiscal Year 2019/20. Expenditures. The YTD actual figure above incorporates all General Fund divisions, including non - departmental divisions such as General Overhead. For purposes of departmental analysis, these non - departmental divisions are excluded from the chart on the right which summarizes budgetary performance by department. Departmental operating expenditures (including outstanding purchase orders/encumbrances) are generally consistent with the prior year and on target as of midyear. Factors contributing to a slightly higher percentage expended/encumbered in some departmental budgets include the following: 1) some contracts cover the entire fiscal year and must be fully encumbered with a purchase order at the beginning of the fiscal year and 2) certain overhead cost allocations are fully allocated at the General Fund % Spent by Department As of 12/31/2019 (SO°lo of Year Complete) Administrative Services Animal Care and Services Building and Safety City Clerk City Council City Management Community Improvement Community S ervices Econ. and Comm. Dev. 42% 59% i 61% 46% 38% 48% 54% � 53% 1 45% beginning of the fiscal year. Additionally, the increase in the Sheriff's contract to reflect negotiated salary increases was not readily determinable when the budget was adopted. Although an estimated increase was included in the budget, actual costs are exceeding that estimate slightly resulting in a higher percentage of the budget being spent at midyear as compared to the prior year. In the prior year, the Records Management budget included a line item for the 2018 General Election, which was not expended as of midyear. This unspent line item resulted in the department's percentage expended/encumbered being lower in the prior year. As of midyear, spending for this department is more in line with historical norms. Page 115 Page 307 City of Rancho Cucamonga Midyear Financial Update Six Month Period Ended December 31, 2019 Some savings may occur by the end of the fiscal year due to personnel vacancies for a portion of the year. These overall savings will be partially offset by other cost increases in part-time salaries, overtime, and contract services for backfilling of vacant positions and by the unanticipated reimbursement of a portion of a prior year Administrative Fee to the RDASA based on direction from the Countywide Oversight Board. Although the expenditure budget includes carryover purchase orders totaling approximately $1.1 million, net projected savings in the various departmental budgets have resulted in a projected increase of only $296,000 in the General Fund's total expenditure budget. There are reserve funds set aside to fully fund the carryover purchase orders, so overall net departmental budget savings are currently projected at approximately $824,000. Top Seven Revenues. The City's top seven revenues account for about 91% of total General Fund revenues (compared to 92% in the prior year). Following is a summary of these revenues as of midyear: Top Seven Revenues Budget YTD Actual % Received Sales Tax 32,552,480 10,497,155 32% Vehicle license fees* 20,279,320 - 0% Franchise fees 6,652,070 1,105,018 17% Property tax 9,672,760 5,053,064 52% Development fees 4,180,000 3,317,998 79% Business licenses 2,779,690 1,606,456 58% Trans. occupancy taxes 4,613,410 1,812,608 39% *Includes Property tax in -lieu of VLF Sales Tax. Revenues as of the six months ended December 31, 2019 are at 32% of budget (compared to 35% in the prior year). The percentage is lower than 50% as of midyear due to the timing of our receipts from the State and the County. As of midyear, we have received four months' allocation of sales tax revenues from the State and five months' allocation of Prop 172 revenues, which is consistent with the prior year. As noted in the first quarter update to Council, we are winding down on the impacts of the prior year transition to a new software platform by the CDTFA, which resulted in delays in sales tax receipts for several quarters. The City's sales tax consultant has provided the City with its best estimate of the revenue shortfall each quarter throughout this transition period. This has enabled Finance staff to reflect/accrue sales tax revenues within the correct quarters regardless of when the remittance is received from the State. Based on discussions with the City's sales tax consultant, it appears our sales tax revenues will be a little higher (about $600,000 or 2%) than the estimate they provided to us during the FY 2019/20 budget process. The primary reasons for this increase are the additional revenue from online sales now being realized after Wayfair/AB147 through the County use tax pool and higher building -construction and business -industrial receipts. However, our consultant is aware of a large $7.5 million deallocation that is expected to impact the San Bernardino County Pool sometime soon, though they aren't sure of the timing of this correction. The deallocation will reverse previous misallocations made for a specific sales tax generator, dating back to 2012. The revenue will be allocated to the agency where it should have gone and taken away from the other agencies in the County Pool where it was misallocated. Due to the uncertainty of the timing, the potential impact is not accounted for in the projected increase noted above. Our consultant estimates it will probably occur by the end of this fiscal year, but they believe that the City and the other impacted agencies will be offered mitigation so that we will be able to delay or spread -out the impact. Our City's share of the impact is estimated at around $550,000. If this occurs, we would basically end our fiscal year right in line with budget after taking into consideration the projected $600,000 increase noted above. In order to be conservative in our revenue estimates, no adjustment to the sales tax budget is proposed at this time. Staff will work with the City's sales tax consultant to monitor the situation and determine if any future budgetary action is necessary. Page 215 Page 308 City of Rancho Cucamonga Midyear Financial Update Six Month Period Ended December 31, 2019 Along with the potential deallocation, staff will continue to monitor sales tax closely for possible slowing of revenue. While the opening of Haven City Market is a positive impact, Victoria Gardens is experiencing several major tenant vacancies compared to last year, Sears is winding down operations, and the City has lost a few restaurants. The impact of these trends will take a few quarters to fully determine the impact. Vehicle License Fees (VLF). As of midyear, we have not received a disbursement of VLF from the State which is consistent with the prior year. The VLF relates to excess amounts collected by the State for the prior fiscal year, and it has typically been received during the third quarter of our fiscal year. We will receive property tax in -lieu of VLF from the County in January and May. This revenue source is anticipated to exceed budget by $50,380 based on information provided by our property tax consultant. Franchise Fees. We will not receive the largest components of franchise fee revenues — payments from Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company — until April 2020. Franchise fees from waste management and cable are remitted approximately 30 days after the end of each quarter. These revenues are generally in line with overall budget estimates for this point in the fiscal year. Property Tax. The first major apportionment of taxes occurred in December. Included in the property tax budget is post -RDA property tax revenue of $2,321,430. This portion of the City's property taxes is normally received in January and June as part of the County of San Bernardino's distribution of the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF); however, the January payment was received a few days early at the end of December. This resulted in a higher percentage of revenue received in the current year (52%) compared to the prior year (33%). It is anticipated that overall property tax revenues will be in line with budget as of fiscal year end. Development Fees. Development revenues for engineering fees are coming in as anticipated with a collection percentage of 53.51% as of midyear. Building permit, plan check, and planning revenues are continuing to come in at a fast pace with midyear collections at 94%, 89%, and 82% of budget, respectively. This is due to several very large projects currently in progress, including The Resort. Building permit and plan check revenues are both projected to exceed budget by 25%. Planning fees are projected to exceed budget by 10%. Business Licenses. Business license revenues are on track with projections. The peak of the renewals is not received until January. Transient Occupancy Taxes. Four months of revenue were recognized in the prior fiscal year for the City's most recently completed hotel. However, actual TOT receipts were less than projected. As a result, the remaining eight months of revenues included in the current year's budget were overestimated. Additionally, several factors are impacting the TOT revenue of many of the City's established hotels. These factors include periodic dips in or stagnation of our occupancy rates as well as our average daily room rates, competition with our neighboring cities for market share, and potential reduced tourism from the Chinese market due to the recent outbreak of the Coronavirus. Based on year to date activity, TOT revenues are projected to be down from the prior year for all but two of the City's hotels. The prior year's budget shortfall was approximately $79,600. With the current conditions, FY 2019/20 TOT revenues are projected to be more than $400,000 less than budget. Depending on how the next few months develop, some of this revenue may be recouped by a return to normal travel habits for international travelers. It should be noted that, based on the SARS crisis in 2003, the market will ultimately recover with estimates of about a one-third increase in travel in the near term and full recovery within four years. TOT revenues will also grow in future years as a result of the construction of two new hotels estimated to open in the fourth quarter of 2020. Staff will continue to monitor activity in our local hotel market and update the Council as appropriate. As of midyear, it is anticipated that projected increases and decreases in the various General Fund revenues will net to an overall increase of $974,400. Of this amount, $632,500 is related to development fees which can ebb and Page 315 Page 309 City of Rancho Cucamonga Midyear Financial Update Six Month Period Ended December 31, 2019 flow from year to year based on development activity. Non -abated reimbursements have contributed $326,800 to the overall increase. A majority of this increase is due to the Community Improvement Division's proactive response to nuisance properties and vacant structures. This revenue source can also vary from year to year as it is difficult, if not impossible, to project when a property will become a nuisance to abate. Due to the varied nature of these revenue sources, any increases over the General Fund's historic core level of revenues should be programmed for one-time uses or to enhance reserves. LIBRARY FUND Library Fund Financial Condition. As of midyear, Library revenues are at 46% of projections (compared to 37% in the prior year) and expenditures are at 55% (consistent with the prior year). The higher revenue collection percentage in the current year is due to the timing of the County's payment of the statutory passthrough from RPTTF. As noted previously, the first installment is usually received in January; however, it was received in December in the current year. Library Fund Budget* YTD Actual* Percent Revenues $ 6,086,790 $ 2,792,403 46% Expenditures $ 5,863,971 $ 3,251,993 55% *Includes carryover purchase orders. Property tax makes up approximately 81 % of the Library Fund's revenues (compared to 87% in the prior year). As noted above, the first major apportionment of taxes occurred in December. The Library's property tax revenues, however, also include a statutory pass-through from the former Redevelopment Agency. This pass-through represents approximately 35.5% of the Library's property tax revenues and is normally received in January and June as part of the County's distribution of the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF). However, as noted above, the January payment was received in late December resulting in a higher overall revenue collection percentage in the current year (46%) compared to the prior year (37%). Also included in the property tax budget is post -RDA property tax revenue of $140,340. These revenues are also distributed from the RPTTF. Library expenditures are generally on target as budgeted. However, the Department will experience some salary savings due to vacancies and the restructuring of certain positions. These savings will offset minimal adjustments to the Library's revenues. As in the General Fund, expenditures are slightly higher than 50% as of midyear due to the fact that some contracts cover the entire fiscal year and must be fully encumbered with a purchase order at the beginning of the fiscal year, and certain overhead cost allocations are fully allocated at the beginning of the fiscal year. FIRE DISTRICT Fire District Financial Condition. With 50% of the year complete, Fire District operating revenues are at 51 % of projections (compared to 44% in the prior year) and expenditures are at 53% (compared to 49% in the prior year). The revenue collection percentage is higher in the current year due to the earlier than expected payment of the Fire District's share of RPTTF. See additional discussion regarding property taxes below. Fire District Budget* YTD Actual* Percent Revenues $ 37,066,440 $ 19,083,667 51% Expenditures $ 37,734,500 $ 19,954,721 53% *Includes carryover purchase orders. Property tax comprises approximately 89% of the Fire District's operating revenues (compared to 91% in the prior year) which includes the General Fund, CFD 85-1, and CFD 88-1. The first major apportionment of taxes occurred in December. Included in the property tax budget is post -RDA property tax revenues of $5,650,700. This amount Page 415 Page 310 City of Rancho Cucamonga Midyear Financial Update Six Month Period Ended December 31, 2019 represents a statutory pass-through from the former Redevelopment Agency. The full amount of the pass-through is allocated on a percentage basis between the Fire District's operating funds and its capital fund based upon the operating budget needs of the Fire District each fiscal year. As noted above, RPTTF revenues will be received in January and June. In November 2019, the Council authorized the District to hire six Firefighters in FY 2019/20 for increased staffing on two ladder truck companies. This action resulted in additional appropriations to fund the new staff for the period from January through June 2020, which are reflected in the budget above. These appropriations were funded by District reserves as it is the intent of the District to continue waiving fire prevention permit and inspection fees and maintaining Community Facilities Districts at current rates. Going forward, these positions will be funded by an increased allocation of RPTTF funding from the District's capital fund to its operational fund. The Fire District's recurring expenditures are on track as of midyear, with some salary savings anticipated due to personnel vacancies for a portion of the year and some savings in the contracts for dispatch services and radio equipment maintenance. SUMMARY The City's General Fund is facing some challenges from the revenue side with projected decreases in TOT revenues and very mild growth in sales tax revenues. While development fees and non -abated revenues are projected to end the fiscal year well above the Adopted Budget, much of this growth should not be relied upon to fund on-going expenditures but rather to fund one-time expenditures or to enhance reserves. Personnel vacancies have offset the projected shortfalls in recurring revenues with savings in recurring expenditures. It is recommended that these vacancies be held for the rest of the year to enable the City to absorb anticipated revenue shortfalls and cost increases next fiscal year. During the upcoming FY 2020/21 budget meetings, revenue projections will be reviewed in conjunction with projected cost increases to determine the appropriate course of action for filling the vacancies in the future. The Library Fund's and Fire District's operating budgets for expenditures are performing well as of midyear and are consistent with the prior year, with some enhancements for new Fire District staffing. Generally, revenues are on track or slightly ahead of projections, and expenditures are on track with or slightly below historical norms. The allocation of the Fire District's RPTTF funding will be shifted more towards the District's operating funds in the future to fund the annual cost of the new Firefighters. However, the Fire District will still continue to build its capital reserves. Page 515 Page 311 City of Rancho Cucamonga Fiscal Year 2019/20 Operating Budget Midyear Financial Update Presented to the City Council February 19, 2020 Midyear Financial Update - Scope Operating Budget kINIEKIN M.N. him city General Fund Library Fund Fire District Operating n Funds 31 General Fund Snapshot General Fund Budget* YTD Actual* Percent Revenues $ 88,342,795 $ 27,227,452 31% Expenditures $ 89,498,494 $ 41,529,438 46% *Includes carryover purchase orders. Top Seven Revenues 91% of total General Fund revenues (25.12 %) (11.98%) Vehicle license fees Property tax $20,279,320 $9,672,760 (5.18%) (5.71%1 Development fees $4,180,000 (40.32% 1 {5.24 0� Transient occupancy (3.44%) I Sales tax $32,552,480 Franchise fees taxes Business licenses $6,652,070 $4,613,410 $2,779,690 91% of total General Fund revenues Top Seven Revenues (continued) Sales Ta Top Seven Revenues (continued) • Sales tax • Winding down on impacts of prior year transition to a new software platform by CDTFA • Revenues are anticipated to be slightly higher by "'$600,000 • Large $7.5 million deallocation expected to impact San Bernardino County Pool sometime soon • Estimated impact on Rancho Cucamonga is decrease of ^'$550,000 • Net impact: In line with budget • Staff will continue to monitor sales tax closely for possible slowing of revenue Top Seven Revenues (continued) Vehicle License *IncludesProperty • of CITY OF R) r Top Seven Revenues (continued) • Vehicle License Fees (VLF) • As of current date, no VLF has been received from the State which is consistent with prior year The VLF relates to excess amounts collected by the State for the prior fiscal year, and it has typically been received during the third quarter of our fiscal year • Property tax -in -lieu of VLF is received after midyear Anticipated to exceed budget by $50,380 Top Seven Revenues (continued) Franchise Fees FY 2019/20 FY 2018/19 Budget YTD Actual Top Seven Revenues (continued) • Franchise Fees • Largest components received in April for gas and electric utilities • Franchise fees from waste management and cable are generally in line with budget Top Seven Revenues (continued) Property Tac Top Seven Revenues (continued) • Property tax • Budget includes post -RDA property tax revenue of $2,321,430 • Normally, this revenue is received in January and June • January payment was received early (December 2019) resulting in a higher percentage received in FY 2019/20 compared to FY 2018/19 • Overall, property tax revenues will be in line with budget as of fiscal year end Top Seven Revenues (continued) Development Fees Top Seven Revenues (continued) • Development Fees • Engineering Fees are coming in as anticipated, with a collection percentage of 53.51% as of midyear • Other development fees are continuing to come in at a fast pace: • Building Permits — 94% collected • Plan Check Fees — 89% collected • Planning Fees — 82% collected • Anticipate revenues will exceed Adopted Budget by $632,500 due to several very large projects currently in Top Seven Revenues (continued) Business Licenses FY 2019/20 FY 2018/19 Budget YTD Actual • On track with projections Top Seven Revenues (continued) Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) 39% ■ Budget YTD Actual FY 2018/19 43% Top Seven Revenues (continued) • Transient Occupancy Taxes • Several factors are impacting TOT revenue from many of the City's established hotels: • Periodic dips in or stagnation of our occupancy rates as well as average daily room rates • Competition with our neighboring cities for market share • Potential reduced tourism from the Chinese market due to recent outbreak of Coronavirus • Based on YTD activity, TOT revenues are projected to be down for all but two of the City's hotels Top Seven Revenues (continued) • Transient Occupancy Taxes (continued) • With current conditions, revenues are projected at a budget shortfall of more than $400,000 • Depending on how the next few months develop, some of this revenue may be recouped by a return to normal travel habits for international travelers • Growth will also occur upon the completion of two new hotels estimated to open in the fourth quarter of 2020 • Staff will continue to monitor activity in our local hotel market and update the Council as appropriate General Fund Revenues - Overall $632,500 Development Fees $326,800 Non -Abated Reimbursements $15,100 Other Net Changes $974,400 Net to General Fund One -Time Expenditures c. Reserves Departmental Expenditures General Fund % Spent by Department As of 12/31/2019 (50%' of Year Complete) Administrative Services* Animal Care and Services Building and Safety City Clerk" City Cou n d I" City Management" Community Improvement Community S ervices Econ. and Comm. Dev. Engineering Planning Police Public Works Records Management" 42% 59% M 61% 46% 38% i 4896 64% 53% 45% 60% 62% i 56% 66% 9 36% 0% 10% 20% 3D°la 4D°la 5D% 6D% 7D% *Central Services Departments Departmental Expenditures (continued) • Generally on target as of midyear • Factors contributing to slightly higher percentage expended/encumbered: • Annual contracts fully encumbered at beginning of year • Certain overhead cost allocations completely allocated at beginning of year • Sheriff's contract increase to reflect negotiated salary increases was not readily determinable when the budget was adopted "ctual costs are exceeding estimated increase Departmental Expenditures (co n td) • Central services departments (identified with an asterisk on previous chart) have a slightly lower percentage expended/encumbered as of midyear due to full allocation of City's Cost Allocation Plan (CAP). • CAP allocation results in a net reduction to the central services departments' General Fund budgets • CAP allocation increased slightly (9.87%) from prior year • These costs have been allocated to non -General Fund cni irres Departmental Expenditures (co n Cd) • Potential savings by end of fiscal year • Salary savings due to personnel vacancies • Partially offset by cost increases in part-time salaries, overtime, and contract services for backfilling of vacant positions • Also offset by the unanticipated reimbursement of a portion of a prior year Administrative Fee to the RDASA based on direction from the Countywide Oversight Net departmental budget savings are projected at iroximately $824,000 Library Fund Snapshot Library Fund Budget* YTD Actual* Percent Revenues $ 61086,790 $ 21792,403 46% Expenditures $ 518631971 $ 312511993 55% *Includes carryo ver purchase orders. Library Fund Snapshot (continued) • Property tax makes up approximately 81% of the Library's budget • Includes a statutory pass-through from the County RPTTF received twice per fiscal year (previously distributed by the former Redevelopment Agency) • Pass-through represents 35.5% of property tax revenue • Includes additional post -RDA property tax revenues due to elimination of former RDA (2.9% of property tax reve n u e) Library Fund Snapshot (continued) • Library expenditures are generally on target as budgeted • Some salary savings will occur due to vacancies and restructuring of certain positions • Savings will offset minimal adjustments to the Library's revenues Fire District Operating Funds Snapshot Fire District Budget* YTD Actual* Percent Revenues $ 37,066,440 $ 19,083,667 51% Expenditures $ 37,734,500 $ 19,954,721 53% *Includes carryo ver purchase orders. • Includes General Fund, CFD 85-1 and CFD 88-1 Fire District Operating Funds Snapshot (continued) • Property tax makes up approximately 89% of the Fire District's budget (compared to 91% in the prior year) • Includes post -RDA property tax revenues due to elimination of RDA • Allocation of post -RDA property tax between operating and capital funds will be shifted more toward operating by fiscal year end to fund the cost of six new Firefighters that were hired in January as well as the effects of labor contracts that were finalized early in the fiscal year Fire District Operating Funds Snapshot (continued) • Some increased revenues are anticipated for interest earnings ($95,650) and the reimbursement from OPEB Trust ($24,450) • The Fire District anticipates utilizing reserves in the current year: $413,440 of the Fire Fund's reserve for employee leave payouts to fund payouts to separated employees $594,710 of CFD 85-1's operating reserves to fund a portion of the cost for the six new Firefighters and labor ---4.-acts Fire District Operating Funds Snapshot (continued) • Fire District operating expenditures are anticipated to exceed the FY 2019/20 Adopted Budget by $2,865,020 or 7.7% due to: • Hiring of six new Firefighters as of midyear • Leave payouts for separated employees • Effect of MOUs approved in the beginning of the fiscal year for Fire Support Services, Fire MEG, and Fire Union Fire District Operating Funds Snapshot (continued) • As noted previously, these increased expenditures will be funded by a combination of the use of reserves and the reallocation of post -RDA property tax revenues between operating and capital funds Summary Fund Midyear Results Recommendations General Fund * Decreases/slowing in some primary * Continue to monitor revenues for revenue sources * Growth in non-recurring revenue sources * Net savings from personnel vacancies offsetting shortfalls in recurring revenues Library Fund * Revenues and expenditures are generally on track with budget Fire District * Revenues slightly ahead of projections Operating * Expenditures are performing well, with Funds some enhancements for new Firefighters, leave payouts, and labor contracts impact of Coronavirus and any slowing in local economy * Use non-recurring revenue growth for non-recurring expenditures or reserves * Hold personnel vacancies pending outcome of FY 2020/21 budget meetings Anv nuestic �CA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Hope Velarde, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT THE 2020 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached 2020 Legislative Platform. BACKGROUND: Each year, there are a multitude of bills introduced in the State Legislature and U.S Congress that directly impact the operations of municipal government. Often, the City needs to take a position on a particular piece of legislation that will have an impact on the City or local government in general. City staff carefully monitors pending State and Federal legislation and once a position is adopted, staff works closely with the City Council to advocate on behalf of the City to members of the State Legislature, the Governor's office, members of Congress, or various states and federal agencies. The 2020 Legislative Platform serves as an outline and reference guide for legislative positions and objectives that shape the actions of both City Council and staff. It is the foundation of a focused advocacy strategy with the primary objective of adopting official City positions on clearly stated legislative issues at the start of the legislative session. It encourages collaboration with the League of California Cities and other local agencies in supporting the City's diverse legislative interests. The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not typically address matters that are not pertinent to local government services or duties, such as socially divisive, partisan, or international affairs. The Legislative Platform is adopted on an annual basis and directs the City's Legislative Program through the incorporation of key strategic actions that include the communication of legislative positions on proposed Federal, State, and County legislation, measures, initiatives, and governmental regulations, as well as the pursuit of Federal, State, and County funding for City projects, services, and programs. The attached 2020 Legislative Platform builds upon this foundation and has been updated to reflect issues that are anticipated to continue or emerge throughout the upcoming legislative session. Issues that have been resolved or are no longer relevant are typically removed. The Legislative Platform is continually reviewed using the goals and objectives of the City Council, a review of legislative priorities from the League of California Cities and other regional agencies, research of current laws and pending legislation, as well as input from City departments, local legislative staff, and the City's legislative advocates. ANALYSIS: For the 2020 Legislative Platform, staff has taken a comprehensive approach to updating the Page 312 document. Staff carefully analyzed and identified positions for redundancy and relevancy with several of these either removed or consolidated with existing positions in the Platform. The 2019 Legislative Platform was also restructured to reflect a more overarching principle -based approach. For example, categories include good governance, quality of life, housing and land use, and community investments. These categories streamline the Legislative Platform into a more concise and comprehensive document. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: MID AND LONG RANGE PLANNING The Legislative Advocacy Program supports the City's long-term goals by advocating for its interests at the Federal and State level. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Legislative Platform 2020 Page 313 2020 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM The 2020 Legislative Platform provides a framework for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Legislative Program and serves as the foundation of a focused advocacy strategy and reference guide for legislative positions and objectives that provide direction for the City Council and staff throughout the year. The Legislative Platform allows the City Council to adopt official City positions on clearly stated legislative issues at the start of the legislative session. STATE PRIORITIES GOOD GOVERNANCE Support Efforts To: Restore reliability and predictability in the State's electrical supply by finding solutions to the issue of utility wildfire liability and ending the practice of public safety power shutoffs. Restore sustainability of Public Pension benefit plans by implementing reform measures such as modifying retirees' COLA increases, permitting cities to modify benefits prospectively for active employees, and limiting the practice of divestment. Support sales tax reform which recognizes recent legal changes that affect the collection of sales tax from on-line out-of-state entities, modernizes the tax structure to reflect the increasing use of e-commerce, and considers consumption of personal or retail services so that sales tax is equitably distributed to those communities where the purchase is made and those communities which are part of the supply chain or have a physical presence or impact. Streamline environmental processing for regulatory permits issued by Caltrans and various other state and federal agencies for the purpose of expediting public infrastructure developments. IN, Restore fiscal incentives that support the annexation of adjacent inhabited territory to ensure it is fiscally viable to improve service delivery to residents in these areas. Allow for Caltrans to relinquish control of Caltrans -operated traffic signal intersections during emergency evacuations as well as for daily operations. Update outdated state requirements in order to allow public safety agencies to consider alternative technologies, such as microgrids, when providing emergency back-up power for critical public safety facilities. Page 1 of 8 Page 314 Oppose Efforts To: IN, Require local agencies to unreasonably provide additional paid leaves of absence to specified employee groups for workplace injuries. Create a duplicative, single -objective government agency in San Bernardino County for the purpose of delivering the Gold Line rail service to Ontario International Airport. Impose burdensome and unnecessary scrutiny on Successor Agencies submitting reimbursements to their respective oversight boards for administrative costs as part of their ROPS and as allowed by state law. Place additional requirements pertaining to mandatory employee orientations. Put cities at a disadvantage in the collective bargaining process, impose binding arbitration or circumvent the collective bargaining process between cities and employee groups. Make changes that would unreasonably increase employer liability and costs for workers' compensation or employer liability for unemployment compensation. Limit local authority by making it more onerous for cities to contract for various services. Impose state -mandated costs for which there is no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefits. Amend the California Public Records Act requiring public agencies to retain and preserve every public record that is transmitted by electronic email. Pre-empt or reduce local discretion over locally imposed taxes. Require local governments to directly pay retirees and/or their beneficiaries disallowed retirement benefits using general fund dollars. QUALITY OF LIFE Support Efforts To: 1w Provide cities with additional tools and resources to help facilitate local efforts, such as programs and services, to address and prevent homelessness. Equitably distribute Cap and Trade revenues in all areas of the state more commensurate with each community's burden in meeting the State's overall GHG reduction goals and allow for greater portions of Cap and Trade revenues for projects located outside of, but still benefit, Disadvantaged Communities as defined by CalEnviroscreen. Assist municipal utilities in meeting the State's climate goals where resource choice and utility planning flexibility are needed to achieve the State's carbon reduction goals while maintaining affordable electric rates and reliability. Page 2 of 8 Page 315 Incentivize energy storage and micro -grid technologies that makes the transition to renewable energy more financially attractive and help meet the State's 2030 gHg emission targets. Address criminal justice concerns created by the passage of AB 109, Proposition 47 and Proposition 57, which reduced jail time served, reclassified certain crimes from felonies to misdemeanors, and took away the inability to take into account an individual's criminal history. Allow cities to limit the number and location of sex offender and parolee group homes within the City limits. Improve interoperability of regional voice and data communications equipment. Preserve local authority to adequately enforce state and local vehicle violations. Support efforts that reduce waste and encourage the use of environmentally sustainable strategies and products in order to advance State and local environmental goals. Oppose Efforts To: Erode the local control provisions provided to cities and counties through the Medical Marijuana Safety Act and the Adult Use of Marijuana Act. Require allowing a minimum number of licenses authorizing retail cannabis activity within a jurisdiction based on arbitrary indicators such as population and existing liquor licenses. Limit local government's ability to regulate encampments on sidewalks, and public parks and other public spaces. HOUSING AND LAND USE Support Efforts To: Streamline and improve the CEQA process in order to improve housing production and affordability. Restore a viable form of tax increment financing to advance transit -oriented development, build affordable and workforce housing, improve jobs/housing balances, and revitalize and invest in local communities. Preserve local authority when addressing housing production and affordability and ensure housing development is consistent with local housing elements, design and parking standards, height limitations, housing density, health and safety standards and community interests. Provide opportunities for cities to receive sufficient revenue, without impact fee restrictions, in order to help ensure that any new residential development generates enough revenue to cover the provision of municipal services that it would require. Page 3 of 8 Page 316 Establish a real, substantial and ongoing source of funding for affordable housing options. IN, Preserve municipal authority over the public right-of-way and ensuring fair and reasonable compensation for use of the right-of-way. Oppose Efforts To: 0, Limit cities' ability to implement shared mobility programs in their communities. IN, Punish cities that did not meet its RHNA housing goals by threatening to take away its allocation of SB 1 transportation funds. Regulate large freight facilities without providing a balanced approach between reducing air pollution and ensuring the economic vitality of the logistics industry. Require local governments to lease out public property to the telecommunications industry, limit how much cities can charge for a lease, eliminate the ability for cities to negotiate public benefits and prevent the public's input and full discretionary review for the installation of "small cell" wireless equipment. Require cities to modify their permitting process or establish set timeframes for inspecting and approving local projects. Impose a mandatory cap on local parking standards in transit intensive areas. Limit public engagement, design and environmental review related to housing projects. Impose statewide standards concerning accessory dwelling units such as design and parking standards, owner occupancy requirements, and health and safety standards. Impose limitations on impact fees for accessory dwelling units that local municipalities can collect. Implement a mandate holding cities and counties legally accountable for providing adequate housing shelters for the homeless. COMMUNITY INVESTMENTS Support Efforts To: Obtain sufficient funding to complete the Etiwanda Railroad Grade Separation Project. Attain Prop 68 funding for the continued build -out of Central Park and other park improvements. Provide an ongoing, permanent funding source for the Public Library system's Link Plus program, which allows for a book lending between libraries throughout California. Page 4 of 8 Page 317 Provide cities with funding and resources in order to build capacity for increasing climate resiliency. IN, Build the Foothill Gold Line Extension to the Ontario International Airport along alignments that utilize the existing Metrolink infrastructure north of and parallel to 811 Street as well as the existing San Bernardino County Flood Control right-of-way for the Cucamonga or Deer Creek Channels and include a station in Rancho Cucamonga. [ Recognize the importance of San Bernardino County to the overall goods movement systems as part of any statewide investment plan in transportation. Provide a long-term, sustainable funding source for critically needed technological upgrades and the continued operation of the emergency 9-1-1 system. [ Provide funding for the reimbursement of costs associated with pre -positioning first responders, fire apparatus and equipment in advance of identifiable risks. Provide funding support for disaster preparedness, Homeland Security, wildfire response, costs related to public safety power shutoffs, disaster response operation costs and other local emergency management and law enforcement activities. Adopt funding guidelines that allow projects not located within a disadvantaged community, but still benefit a disadvantaged community, to be eligible and competitive for funding. Oppose Efforts To: Pass legislation that would authorize a multi -county ballot measure increasing the sales and use tax and potentially jeopardizing the renewal of critical Measure I transportation funding. Page 5 of 8 Page 318 FEDERAL PRIORITIES GOOD GOVERNANCE Support Efforts To: 110, Increase federal investment in goods movement infrastructure that recognizes Southern California and San Bernardino County's position as the nation's gateway for containerized freight. In order to ensure fair and equitable access to digital media, regulate the book publishing industry in order to end the practice of introducing sever restrictions to e -book and e-audiobook lending for public libraries, including embargoes on the sales of new titles and unreasonably high prices, which far exceed the prices offered for print books. Streamline federal reporting/monitoring requirements in order to reduce project delivery times without comprising critical oversight mechanisms. IN, Increase FHA home loan limits in order to accurately reflect the region's skyrocketing home values and make home ownership more attainable. Streamline environmental processing for federal regulatory permits issued by the US Army Corp of Engineers, US Fish & Wildlife Service, Federal Highway Administration and various other state and federal agencies for the purpose of expediting public infrastructure projects. Take into account the economic impacts of proposed endangered species listings, as well as provide for a streamlined process for the delisting of species no longer threatened or endangered. Oppose Efforts To: Eliminate the tax exempt status of municipal bonds and proposals to cap the investor tax deduction on municipal securities investments. Allow online travel companies to circumvent remittance of transient occupancy taxes to local governments from hotel reservations purchased using the internet. 0, Limit or prohibit the creation of municipally -owned broadband internet service provision and/or infrastructure. QUALITY OF LIFE Support Efforts To: Support the creation of new funding opportunities at the federal, state and local level to assist cities in providing creative and sustainable solutions to address homelessness. 0, Provide local governments with the authority and resources to restrict illegal birthing Page 6 of 8 Page 319 houses. Make modifications to the COPS Hiring Program grant in order to provide a greater federal cost share of the deputies' salary and provide equitable opportunities for suburban communities to be competitive in the grant application process. Oppose Efforts To: Eliminate and/or defund the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) and the National Endowment of Arts (NEA). Cut funding for critical law enforcement programs such as the Byrne/JAG and COPS programs. COMMUNITY INVESTMENT Support Efforts To: Provide funding opportunities for proven crime -fighting technology such as Automated Vehicle License Plate Readers. Attract funding to provide for museum -quality exhibits at the second floor of the Rancho Cucamonga Library. Provide funding for the development of an Advanced Traffic Management System. Invest in regional rail connectivity to Ontario International Airport. Finalize and implement the Cucamonga Canyon Management Plan and attract federal resources for the preservation and proper management of Cucamonga Canyon. Increase funding for disaster preparedness, prevention, recovery, and response for all hazard threats, including investment in assisting communities with necessary upgrades to existing flood control systems. Provide a dedicated funding source for Safe Routes to Schools programs. Support funding guidelines that allow projects that are not located within a disadvantaged community, but still benefit a disadvantaged community, to be eligible and competitive for funding. Oppose Efforts To: Eliminate or reduce funding for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs. Allow for a more streamlined application process and for greater flexibility of local appropriation and use of monies. 0, Sell the transmission assets of the Department of Energy's Power Marketing Page 7 of 8 Page 320 Administration, which would threaten the allocation of Hoover Dam hydropower the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility receives. Page 321 2/19/2020 AMENDED LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM 2020 LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM The 2020 Legislative Platform provides a framework for the City of Rancho Cucamonga's Legislative Program and serves as the foundation of a focused advocacy strategy and reference guide for legislative positions and objectives that provide direction for the City Council and staff throughout the year. The Legislative Platform allows the City Council to adopt official City positions on clearly stated legislative issues at the start of the legislative session. STATE PRIORITIES GOOD GOVERNANCE Support Efforts To: ► Restore reliability and predictability in the State's electrical supply by finding solutions to the issue of utility wildfire liability and ending the practice of public safety power shutoffs. ► Restore sustainability of Public Pension benefit plans by implementing reform measures such as modifying retirees' COLA increases, permitting cities to modify benefits prospectively for active employees, and limiting the practice of divestment. ► Support sales tax reform which recognizes recent legal changes that affect the collection of sales tax from on-line out-of-state entities, modernizes the tax structure to reflect the increasing use of e-commerce, and considers consumption of personal or retail services so that sales tax is equitably distributed to those communities where the purchase is made and those communities which are part of the supply chain or have a physical presence or impact. ► Streamline environmental processing for regulatory permits issued by Caltrans and various other state and federal agencies for the purpose of expediting public infrastructure developments. ► Restore fiscal incentives that support the annexation of adjacent inhabited territory to ensure it is fiscally viable to improve service delivery to residents in these areas. ► Allow for Caltrans to relinquish control of Caltrans -operated traffic signal intersections during emergency evacuations as well as for daily operations. ► Update outdated state requirements in order to allow public safety agencies to consider alternative technologies, such as microgrids, when providing emergency back-up power for critical public safety facilities. Page 1 of 7 Oppose Efforts To: 0- Require local agencies to unreasonably provide additional paid leaves of absence to specified employee groups for workplace injuries. F Create a duplicative, single -objective government agency in San Bernardino County for the purpose of delivering the Gold Line rail service to Ontario International Airport. IIN- Impose burdensome and unnecessary scrutiny on Successor Agencies submitting reimbursements to their respective oversight boards for administrative costs as part of their ROPS and as allowed by state law. ♦ Place additional requirements pertaining to mandatory employee orientations. 0- Put cities at a disadvantage in the collective bargaining process, impose binding arbitration or circumvent the collective bargaining process between cities and employee groups. F Make changes that would unreasonably increase employer liability and costs for workers' compensation or employer liability for unemployment compensation. F Limit local authority by making it more onerous for cities to contract for various services. F Impose state -mandated costs for which there is no guarantee of local reimbursement or offsetting benefits. 111- Amend the California Public Records Act requiring public agencies to retain and preserve every public record that is transmitted by electronic email. IIN- Pre-empt or reduce local discretion over locally imposed taxes. ♦ Require local governments to directly pay retirees and/or their beneficiaries disallowed retirement benefits using general fund dollars. QUALITY OF LIFE Support Efforts To: IIN- Provide cities with additional tools and resources to help facilitate local efforts, such as programs and services, to address and prevent homelessness. 0- Equitably distribute Cap and Trade revenues in all areas of the state more commensurate with each community's burden in meeting the State's overall GHG reduction goals and allow for greater portions of Cap and Trade revenues for projects located outside of, but still benefit, Disadvantaged Communities as defined by CalEnviroscreen. 0- Assist municipal utilities in meeting the State's climate goals where resource choice and utility planning flexibility are needed to achieve the State's carbon reduction goals while maintaining affordable electric rates and reliability. Page 2 of 7 F Incentivize energy storage and micro -grid technologies that makes the transition to renewable energy more financially attractive and help meet the State's 2030 gHg emission targets. F Address criminal justice concerns created by the passage of AB 109, Proposition 47 and Proposition 57, which reduced jail time served, reclassified certain crimes from felonies to misdemeanors, and took away the inability to take into account an individual's criminal history. F Allow cities to limit the number and location of sex offender and parolee group homes within the City limits. 0, Improve interoperability of regional voice and data communications equipment. 101- Preserve local authority to adequately enforce state and local vehicle violations. 0- Support efforts that reduce waste and encourage the use of environmentally sustainable strategies and products in order to advance State and local environmental goals. ♦ Oppose Efforts To: 0- Erode the local control provisions provided to cities and counties through the Medical Marijuana Safety Act and the Adult Use of Marijuana Act. F Require allowing a minimum number of licenses authorizing retail cannabis activity within a jurisdiction based on arbitrary indicators such as population and existing liquor licenses. F Limit local government's ability to regulate encampments on sidewalks, and public parks and other public spaces. HOUSING AND LAND USE Support Efforts To: 0, Streamline and improve the CEQA process in order to improve housing production and affordability. 0- Restore a viable form of tax increment financing to advance transit -oriented development, build affordable and workforce housing, improve jobs/housing balances, and revitalize and invest in local communities. P0 Preserve local authority when addressing housing production and affordability and ensure housing development is consistent with local housing elements, design and parking standards, height limitations, housing density, health and safety standards and community interests. 0- Provide opportunities for cities to receive sufficient revenue, without impact fee restrictions, in order to help ensure that any new residential development generates enough revenue to cover the provision of municipal services that it would require. Page 3 of 7 F Establish a real, substantial and ongoing source of funding for affordable housing options. F Preserve municipal authority over the public right-of-way and ensuring fair and reasonable compensation for use of the right-of-way. Oppose Efforts To: 0- Limit cities' ability to implement shared mobility programs in their communities. 0, Punish cities that did not meet its RHNA housing goals by threatening to take away its allocation of SB 1 transportation funds. 0- Regulate large freight facilities without providing a balanced approach between reducing air pollution and ensuring the economic vitality of the logistics industry. F Require local governments to lease out public property to the telecommunications industry, limit how much cities can charge for a lease, eliminate the ability for cities to negotiate public benefits and prevent the public's input and full discretionary review for the installation of "small cell" wireless equipment. F Require cities to modify their permitting process or establish set timeframes for inspecting and approving local projects. 0, Impose a mandatory cap on local parking standards in transit intensive areas. 101- Limit public engagement, design and environmental review related to housing projects. 0- Impose statewide standards concerning accessory dwelling units such as design and parking standards, owner occupancy requirements, and health and safety standards. ♦ Impose limitations on impact fees for accessory dwelling units that local municipalities can collect. F Implement a mandate holding cities and counties legally accountable for providing adequate housing shelters for the homeless. COMMUNITY INVESTMENTS Support Efforts To: 0- Obtain sufficient funding to complete the Etiwanda Railroad Grade Separation Project. F Attain Prop 68 funding for the continued build -out of Central Park and other park improvements. 0- Provide an ongoing, permanent funding source for the Public Library system's Link Plus program, which allows for a book lending between libraries throughout California. 0- Provide cities with funding and resources in order to build capacity for increasing climate Page 4 of 7 resiliency. Provide enhanced Metrolink service to Ontario International Airport via the Rancho Cucamonga Metrolink station. lIN- Connect Ontario International Airport to the wider Metrolink network via high quality transit to provide better regional connectivity. ♦ Recognize the importance of San Bernardino County to the overall goods movement systems as part of any statewide investment plan in transportation. 0- Provide a long-term, sustainable funding source for critically needed technological upgrades and the continued operation of the emergency 9-1-1 system. 0- Provide funding for the reimbursement of costs associated with pre -positioning first responders, fire apparatus and equipment in advance of identifiable risks. F Provide funding support for disaster preparedness, Homeland Security, wildfire response, costs related to public safety power shutoffs, disaster response operation costs and other local emergency management and law enforcement activities. 0- Adopt funding guidelines that allow projects not located within a disadvantaged community, but still benefit a disadvantaged community, to be eligible and competitive for funding. Oppose Efforts To: F Pass legislation that would authorize a multi -county ballot measure increasing the sales and use tax and potentially jeopardizing the renewal of critical Measure I transportation funding. Page 5 of 7 FEDERAL PRIORITIES GOOD GOVERNANCE Support Efforts To: F Increase federal investment in goods movement infrastructure that recognizes Southern California and San Bernardino County's position as the nation's gateway for containerized freight. ♦ In order to ensure fair and equitable access to digital media, regulate the book publishing industry in order to end the practice of introducing sever restrictions to a -book and e- audiobook lending for public libraries, including embargoes on the sales of new titles and unreasonably high prices, which far exceed the prices offered for print books. IIN- Streamline federal reporting/monitoring requirements in order to reduce project delivery times without comprising critical oversight mechanisms. 0- Increase FHA home loan limits in order to accurately reflect the region's skyrocketing home values and make home ownership more attainable. 0- Streamline environmental processing forfederal regulatory permits issued by the US Army Corp of Engineers, US Fish & Wildlife Service, Federal Highway Administration and various other state and federal agencies for the purpose of expediting public infrastructure projects. IIS Take into account the economic impacts of proposed endangered species listings, as well as provide for a streamlined process for the delisting of species no longer threatened or endangered. Oppose Efforts To: PF Eliminate the tax-exempt status of municipal bonds and proposals to cap the investor tax deduction on municipal securities investments. 0, Allow online travel companies to circumvent remittance of transient occupancy taxes to local governments from hotel reservations purchased using the internet. F Limit or prohibit the creation of municipally -owned broadband internet service provision and/or infrastructure. QUALITY OF LIFE Support Efforts To: F Support the creation of new funding opportunities at the federal, state and local level to assist cities in providing creative and sustainable solutions to address homelessness. 0, Provide local governments with the authority and resources to restrict illegal birthing Page 6 of 7 houses. 0- Make modifications to the COPS Hiring Program grant in order to provide a greater federal cost share of the deputies' salary and provide equitable opportunities for suburban communities to be competitive in the grant application process. Oppose Efforts To: F Eliminate and/or defund the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) and the National Endowment of Arts (NEA). 0, Cut funding for critical law enforcement programs such as the Byrne/JAG and COPS programs. COMMUNITY INVESTMENT Support Efforts To: 0- Provide funding opportunities for proven crime -fighting technology such as Automated Vehicle License Plate Readers. F Attract funding to provide for museum -quality exhibits at the second floor of the Rancho Cucamonga Library. F Provide funding for the development of an Advanced Traffic Management System. F Invest in regional rail connectivity to Ontario International Airport. 0- Finalize and implement the Cucamonga Canyon Management Plan and attract federal resources for the preservation and proper management of Cucamonga Canyon. 0- Increase funding for disaster preparedness, prevention, recovery, and response for all hazard threats, including investment in assisting communities with necessary upgrades to existing flood control systems. 0- Provide a dedicated funding source for Safe Routes to Schools programs. F Support funding guidelines that allow projects that are not located within a disadvantaged community, but still benefit a disadvantaged community, to be eligible and competitive for funding. Oppose Efforts To: 0- Eliminate or reduce funding for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME programs. Allow for a more streamlined application process and for greater flexibility of local appropriation and use of monies. ► Sell the transmission assets of the Department of Energy's Power Marketing Administration, which would threaten the allocation of Hoover Dam hydropower the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility receives. Page 7 of 7