Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-02-10 - SupplementalsCoffee Klatch Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2015-00989 Historic Preservation Commission February 10, 2016 slew c COA D RC2015-00989 • Applicant proposes to add a porch to front of the Thomas Winery Building in front of the Coffee Klatch. • Proposed porch elevation, floor plan, and materials utilize identical materials massing and proportion for the patio to match the existing porch to the front of the Sixty6 Sports Lounge. • Proposed porch will include concrete piers, wood floor, posts, and top rail. r -, n - ri)oo l — — — — — — — _ — — c CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA e . 7oc CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA am CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA zgvm* fill misallmgo" 9111 i. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA t .^. s`t existing 3 fu existing pc,t x. existir 32" from GROUND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Environmental Review • Planning Department staff has determined that the Certificate of Appropriateness is exempt fro the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 31 (CEQA Guidelines 15331) exemption which cove rs restoration/reconstruction. historica resource Conclusion • Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission adopt the Resolution of Approval for Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2015-00989. Planning Commission February 10, 2016 Applicant Jaime Campos, Property Owner Project Description Time Extension DRC2015-01168 — A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 3-lot Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM18626) located at the southeast corner of Lemon Avenue and Daylily Court at 9923 Lemon Avenue — APN: 0201-902-16. S7%" b Aerial Photo Project Site Background and General Information • January 12, 2011, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18626. • Initial approval period was for 3 years. SUBTPM18626 was set to expire on January 13, 2014. • AB 116 extended the approval period for an additional 2 years. New expiration date of January 13, 2016. • Subdivision Map Act allows up to 6 years of extensions. • No changes are proposed. • 3 lots, ranging from 8,455 to 9,635 square feet. • The map is in conformance with the Development Code standards (i.e. lot width, lot depth, lot size). Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM18626 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.18626 ...w.rm�i:..a �i.�vmvae `d"aYn mnc nvr �'�1 ^•+^• •••"•, � 66P3@ � LEYON AV@iE T —__ L — — J I eauw _�___�� t __J r. ._ EDac eT..!'.�.'2 �'y..ob..m.. y.�.... m.. :......ram I mY� ! TEN M'R PARCEL MAP .� ozmcm-e Environmental Review and Recommendation • Categorically Exempt from CEQA under Section 15315 — Minor Land Divisions. • No changes are proposed. Therefore, no additional environmental review necessary. • Staff recommends approval of Time Extension DRC2015- 01168 Planning Commission February 10, 2016 Applicant Larry Wade Jr., owner of Kneadz Work Project Description CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2015-01034 — KNEADZ WORK - A request to operate a massage establishment in a 2,440 square foot tenant space within the General Industrial (GI) zoning district located at 9637 Arrow Route, Suite A. �- Ln n m Q� Arrow Rte Site 1 �49 Business Center Dr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Background • SB 731 (2008): Preempted most local land use, zoning and operational regulations provided that massage establishments and practitioners were certified by the California Massage Therapy Council. • Development Code Update (2012): Massage establishments were permitted "by -right" in all commercial zones, as well as the Industrial Park and General Industrial zoning districts. • AB 1147 (September 18, 2014): Amended the State's current massage therapy laws to expand local authority to adopt zoning regulations, and other reasonable health and safety requirements for massage establishments and practitioners. • Ordinance 872-A (January 1, 2015): The City Council enacted an interim ordinance that now requires a City -issued Conditional Use Permit for new establishments. Approving Authority • Per Chapter 17.16 of the Development Code, the Planning Director is authorized to administratively review and decide all Conditional Use Permits. • Pursuant to Section 17.14.060.0 of the Development Code, the Planning Director may at any point in the application review process, transfer decision making authority to the Planning Commission at her discretion. • At this time the Planning Director is referring Conditional Use Permit applications for massage establishments to the Planning Commission for review and action. Business Specifics • Sports massage therapy practice • Subject Suite is 2,440 square feet in size • Hours of operation • Monday — Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. • Saturday from 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. • Closed Sunday • Minimum of 2 employees, maximum of 7 • 3 dedicated therapy rooms, one multi -purpose room, office, break room, restrooms and storage Floor Plan Public Notification • Notification was sent to surrounding property owners on January 25, 2016 • The site was posted on January 26, 2016 • Hearing notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on January 28, 2016 • Staff has not received any comments or concerns Environmental Determination and Staff Recommendation • The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303. • Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-01034 by adoption of Resolution of Approval 16-08 with conditions of approval. Planning Commission February 10, 2016 Development Review DRC2015-00650 — A request to construct a 44,336 square foot warehouse building on a 93,911 square foot (2.2 acres) lot located on the west side of Pittsburgh Avenue and approximately 275 feet south of 6t" Street in the Industrial Park (IP) District.- APN:0229-341-03 rea of the project site is 2.2 acres qbt (east to west) x 283 feet (north to sot h Vacant Lot Zoning Map and General Plan Land Use Designations Project Sits Industrial Park fl , General Industrial ry _+ Pittss gh Ave �.R f MYSeW, rv�'+_-v �,r�vesxnwy..`d c & .«Y�..1/] � +,k. .. ,�'F y a+j„+ s Ta�+a�• � .;-�Y+r�. : � .G.�'�._. 'r ,,.,� � i � �' Development Review DRC2015-00650 Project Description • The applicant proposes to construct a industrial warehouse building of 44,336 square feet; • The office area will be located at the southeast corner of the building while the dock area with 5 dock doors will be located on the south side of the building; • There will be two points of vehicle access at the southeast and northeast corners of the project site. /� _ § \k Development Review DRC2015-00650 (continued) • The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction painted with a palette of five colors; and • There will be panel windows, Coronado office area; and • Generous provided along the visible. reveal lines, metal canopies above stone and metal accents at the amounts of at the office wall planes blue -tinted glass have been area and at various locations of the building that are most NORTH ELEVATION mm WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION -PITTSBURGH AVE Job No15143DO CONCEPTUAL COLORED ELEVATIONS - 30'CLRJ42'-5'T.O.P. 01262016 DRC2015-00650 Environmental Assessment • The applicant submitted environmental studies and these studies were reviewed by staff. Staff concluded that there would not be any significant effect on the environment. • Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15332- In -Fill Development Projects- as it is on no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. DRC2015-00650 Public Notification • This item was duly advertised as a public hearing and no comments were received by Staff in response to the public notifications. Conclusion • Staff Recommends Approval of Development DRC2015-00650 through the adoption attached Resolution of Approval. Review of the Merrill Gardens at Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00555 Design Review DRC2015-00165 Conditional Use Permit DRC2015-00166 Parcel Map SUBTPM19619 Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00174 Planning Commission January 13, 2016 DCA DRC2015-00555 • Proposes to amend Development Code Table 17.30.030-1 to conditionally permit Residential Care Facilities in the Low (L) and Low -Medium (LM) Residential Districts. • Currently RCF's are conditionally permitted in the Medium (M), Medium -High (MH) and High (H) Residential Districts and the Mixed Use (MU) District. • Establishes a minimum 3.0 acre project site. • All other development standards will be addressed during the CUP/DR review process. DCA D RC2015-00555 Home...._.__._ IpIPPIPPPININNNINNNNINNINNINIPINN Single -Room u u u v v v v u u u u u u u transitional Mousing + April 2015 3 Acre Vacant Parcels ,n acme...... rt "° Lwew CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 7r - .. �".'�+ e . Sri r-• 4-. _�.R. � ♦ fq CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Site Utilization y�i wY; O•Yg1Y�Y wR����R��Yi1Y1r ��rr�anR—yam i i�iLi�w iw R��A• MYwwiY� ��Y�ww���w��rw SUBTPM19619 • 9.5 acre total project site. • Parcel Map proposes 2 parcels. • Parcel 1 is a 4.07 acre site for Merrill Gardens Parcel 2 is a 5.43 acre parcel for the existing Highland Avenue Community Church and School. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map conforms to all residential development standards for lot dimension, and lot size applicable to the subdivision of property in the Low (L) Residential District. a [ I —, — SU BTPM 19619 I 44 PMf.6 2 • ri ....I I w. d dse�wK¢ixo M ew�xre.000rac I X-YIiAL n. q 4q[AS W I nsnorx..ac a DR D RC2015-00165 • Proposal to develop Merrill Gardens at Rancho Cucamonga. 0 4.07 acre site. 0112 Units. o Assisted Living Building —a three -level, 96-unit, 111,684 square foot building. Units include: ■ 19 Studio. ■ 591-bedroom. ■ 18 2-bedroom. o Memory Care Building — a single story, 16-unit, 10,870 square foot building. Units include: ■ 161-bedroom. 0130 total beds. o 64 parking spaces provided (33 required). DR D RC2015-00165 • Project design reflects a contemporary Spanish style and character and includes earth -toned stucco finish, multi -paned windows, clerestory windows, decorative balconies with metal railing, decorative tile, clay the roof, hip and gable roofs, tower elements, and composite trellis. • Project was designed to comply with all Development Code standards including building setbacks, building height, parking, circulation, and landscaping. -�.- 'P PARCFI2 rj Site Plan �. 17 PARCEL2 � nl - l F j aq •��✓ III _ .. ... 4..... y PNRCE2.2 r x Y IIF I Grading Plan - i I JjJnn�LL� MMT'[MIRG SCL �i�s . LF P4ft 11 I � rr �a C f fl3�EttiG4NNG ICI J �� fv II � �- i I •• m. I I 'I �— P n... ..n,n M Y-- Landscape Plan NM_1f PNEPE. -_�� PI/Jif PNE(IE- 1IgE IEGFfID VDN0«V)n] OH]NV)JjO AID .,\ � ® e �: : ar: <¥■■ �� 29 Elevations Elevations � � O � � � _CU W Elevations Elevations • r rNrmlr4nrrn Wpp . u�.rrm n eeu.�N ltr.?rM+u. aab r NNmsMo reb � vn .. Elevations e -law CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA `. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRP 2015-00174 • Arborist Report evaluated thirty- five (35) trees on -site. • None of the existing trees met the minimum height and trunk diameter requirements of the Development Code to be considered Heritage Trees. • Landscape Plan demonstrates the removed trees will be replaced with a variety of trees. • Development Code standards require 183 trees, project proposes 210 trees on -site. Environmental Review • Staff prepared the Initial Study for the project. o Findings in the IS determined that with the imposition of mitigation measures related to aesthetics, agricultural resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hydrology and water quality, and noise, that there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. o Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Conclusion • Staff recommends the following: o Recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project; and o Adopt the attached Resolution recommending that the City Council approve Development Code Amendment DRC2015-00555;and o Adopt the attached Resolutions approving Design Review DRC2015-00165, Conditional Use Permit DRC2015- 00166, Parcel Map SUBTPM19619, and Tree Removal Permit TRP DRC2015-00174 contingent upon City Council adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts and approval of the DCA. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA HO CUUCAMONGA December 15, 2015 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call 7:00 p.m. Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett _ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly _ Lou Munoz_ Rich Macias Additional Staff Present: Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner 11 IL PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS III The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015- A. DRC2015-00650 00650 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING FOR RICHARD DICK & Committee ASSOCIATES - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 44,336 recommended the square foot warehouse building on a 2.2 acre lot located on the west side project be forwarded of Pittsburgh Avenue and approximately 275 feet south of 6rh street in the to the Planning Commission with the Industrial Park (IP) District - APN: 0229-341-03. Related files: CEQA2015- changes discussed 00240, Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00659, and Sign Permit and with staffs DRC2015-1009. review and approval. 1 of 2 EXHIBIT J Item F 7 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RANCHO CoanMONcn December 15, 2015 II III. PUBLIC COMMENTS III This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. II IV. ADJOURNMENT III The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 1, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist l/ with the Planning Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 3, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 2of2 7:39 p.m Item F —18 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AACTION AGENDA GONG+ December 15, 2015 11 III. PUBLIC COMMENTS III This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. 11 IV. ADJOURNMENT III The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p. m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. 1, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist 11 with the Planning Department for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 3, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 2of2 7:39 p.m. Item F —18 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA ANCHO CUCAMONGA December 15, 2015 - 7:00 P.M. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Regular Members: Richard Fletcher X Francisco Oaxaca X Candyce Burnett _ Donald Granger X Alternates: Ray Wimberly_ Lou Munoz_ Rich Macias Additional Staff Present: Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner II II. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS III The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2015- 00650 - CONSOLIDATED CONSULTING FOR RICHARD DICK & ASSOCIATES - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 44,336 square foot warehouse building on a 2.2 acre lot located on the west side of Pittsburgh Avenue and approximately 275 feet south of 61h street in the Industrial Park (IP) District - APN: 0229-341-03. Related files: CEQA2015- 00240, Tree Removal Permit DRC2015-00659, and Sign Permit DRC2015-1009. 1 of 2 7:00 p.m. A. DRC2015-00650 Committee recommended the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission with the changes discussed and with staffs review and approval. EXHIBIT J Item�7