Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020-04-22 Agenda Packet - PC-HPC
CITY OF ! CUCAMONGA 0100'. 6E APRIL 22, 2020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA PURSUANT TO GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM'S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AS A TELECONFERENCE MEETING In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID-19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the Planning Commission Meetings. Members of the Planning Commission and staff will participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In place of in-person attendance, members of the public can observe an offer comment at this meeting remotely in one of two ways: VIEW MEETING VIA ZOOM APP OR ZOOM.COM AT: zoom.us/join Using the Meeting ID: 959-0012-0458 -or- YOU CAN DIAL-IN USING YOUR PHONE UNITED STATES: +1 (669) 900-6833 Access Code: 959 0012 0458 IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING APRIL 22, 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING As an alternative to participating in the teleconference, you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill(cbCitvofRC.us. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and read into the record. If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA") please contact Elizabeth Thornhill at (909) 774--4314 or Elizabeth.Thornhill(a�CityofRC.us at least 48 hours prior to the meeting for assistance. A. 7:00 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Guglielmo Vice Chairman Oaxaca Commissioner Dopp Commissioner Morales Commissioner Williams Page 1 of 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 22, 2020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience.This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. This is call in only. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.Any item may be removed by Commissioners for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of March 11, 2020. D. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chairman will open the public hearing to receive testimony. All such opinions shall be limited to 5 minutes per individual or less as determined by the Chairman. Please sign in after speaking. D1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS—A request for site plan and architectural review along with the operation of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225- Page 2 of 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APRIL 22, 2020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 123-05. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. D2. TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120—SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA—A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 7 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18210) on 4.89 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; APN: 0225-171-04. On March 28, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. D3. TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — A request to allow for the first one (1) year time extension of a previously approved three (3) lot Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM19557) on 0.98 acre acres of land within the Low(L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street—APN: 0201-251-56. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15315 - Minor Land Divisions. E. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS: COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: F. ADJOURNMENT I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, April 16, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Page 3 of 4 CITY . ■ . CUCAMONGA. ! �l APRIL 22, 2020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 4 of 4 VicinityMap Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting April 22 , 2020 0 0 L <D _ I D2 iCL i 10 i � 1 19th St— Base i ti Line Base Line J 4 ifs Church Church 7 Foothill Foothill N � C L 1 E Arrow +' 1 Arrow s y as c j J rsey 8th W j v --• ° � H 6th w C7 6th — D3 L (D - 4th � � _ � 4th 7� Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive D1: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00194- GEORGE BOTROS D2: TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120-SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA D3: TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095-W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONR MARCH 1112020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA A. 7:00 P.M. — CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Chairman Guglielmo _x Vice Chairman Oaxaca _x Commissioner Dopp _x Commissioner Morales x Commissioner Williams x Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney, Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner; Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services; Gianfranco Laurie; Senior Civil Engineer. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Chairman Guglielmo opened the public communications. Seeing none, closed. C. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION Page 1 of 7 006 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0100'. MARCH 11 , 2020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 26, 2020. C2. Consideration to adopt Workshop Minutes of February 26, 2020. Moved by Commissioner Williams, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca; to approve Items C1 and C2. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 to adopt the minutes as presented. D. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/SCHEDULED MATTERS D1. HERITAGE PARK BRIDGES UPDATE —An update on Heritage Park Bridges. Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation. Commissioner Dopp asked regarding Bridges C& D life span, if there is an estimate. Mr. Laurie answered they do not have an estimate. The only thing they have identified in their report is to continue regular monitoring of those specific Bridges C & D. Chairman Guglielmo inquired about the weight load on the new bridge. Mr. Laurie replied those bridges have existed for quite some time. What prompted this would be the visible deterioration that you see when you traverse each bridge. The main vehicle bridge, looking at the deterioration underneath the beam supports, exterior outside the bridges, the deterioration is significant. They have moved forward working with Public Works on some temporary improvements to narrow that travel width from 26 to 12 feet and cross hatching the outside edges. He does not have an answer right now about how much weight the new bridge would hold, but having a concrete super structure in place is going to last 50 years and with current weight regulations in code, it could withstand easily a single axle fire engine along with other passenger vehicle uses. Commissioner Morales asked the amount of the Park District-85 (PD-85) annual assessment. Page 2of7 007 - CITY OF • CUCAMONR MARCH 1112020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services, estimated $30,000 year per household. Public comment: Joseph Calin stated it would be more sufficient to replace bridges all at once. The cost would be less then to pay a contractor to replace each bridge one at a time. Suggests maybe take from emergency funds or funds from the reserve can pay for them now, and then take a loan from PD-85 and pay it back. Mr. Welday stated he agrees and mentioned studies show there would be cost saving to replace bridges all at once but there is no funding. An option would be to look at another funding source, which we have not been able to identify yet or a loan but unfortunately, given the financial position of PD-85 at this time, it would be impossible to pay back from general fund. The City will continue to seek opportunities to fund those improvements of those two bridges while we extend the life as long as we can. Commissioner Dopp stated he knows this is a very sensitive topic for the horse community. Given limited finances and resources, it does show that taxes are important if money is not there. Absent public support, cities are forced to make tough choices. The preference would be to solve the problem all at once, but it seems the most creative way to address the problem is to bring in fire reserves. He supports moving forward to City Council. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated he had a chance to see this information at Design Review concerning the state of the bridges. It's unfortunate the district does not have sufficient funds to implement a complete solution, but this is the most realistic option to give us a couple of functioning bridges for the community. He supports of the proposal. Commissioner Williams stated she also supports the proposal and praised staff for being creative with the fire district to create a way to finance this because there would have been no way to finance alone. It will give the community 50 years or more of usage, she supports the project. Commissioner Morales stated he lives in Landscape Maintenance District-7 (LMD-7) and pays $139 assessment every year. With that fee, they take care of parks on Day Creek. When there is a problem, he reports it and it gets taken care of right away because funding is there. Hopefully, he would like to see PD-85 get considered again Page 3 of 7 008 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONR MARCH 1112020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA in front of voters so in the future, when things come up, we can maintain them. He believes this proposal is reasonable and supports it. Chair Guglielmo asked if the report gives an economic life on the remaining two bridges in this study. Mr. Laurie answered no. The only thing preference in this study is they noted deterioration that has occurred. They identified some temporary improvements and Engineering submitted a work order to Public Works and they are in the process of gathering all the material required to alienate Bridges C & D to produce narrow span. Also, they are going to install signs to limit heavy access along bridges. Moved by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Morales; carried 5-0, to approve staff recommendation to the public works subcommittee. E. PUBLIC HEARINGS/PLANNING COMMISSION E1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00069 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to construct a 24,512 square-foot concrete tilt-up warehouse building at the Rancho Cucamonga public works yard, within the General Industrial (GI) district, located at 8794 Lion Street—APN: 0209-013-85. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation. Albert Espinoza, Deputy Public Works Director, stated the cost for this project is 2.4 million dollars. He is hoping to have the "project shovel"ready by next fiscal year with capital reserves available to build this by. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked what is the anticipated use of the building. Mr. Espinoza answered it would be used for storage. Currently, they have a lot of their equipment in storage containers and want to get away from that due to vandalism and it would make it more sufficient to have it all in one building. Page 4 of 7 009 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONR MARCH 1112020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA No public comments. Commissioner Dopp stated it sounds like very good use of the land and Public Works department. He approves. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated he supports the project. Commissioner Williams stated she supports the project and hopefully it will get under construction when fiscal year works out. Commissioner Morales stated it looks good at site and it's compatible in the area it's in. He supports the project. Moved by Commissioner Williams, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca, to approve Item E1, motion carried unanimously, 5-0, staff recommendation to approve DRC2019-00069. F. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director announced that we have launched the website for General Plan Update (Cityofrc.us/Genera1P1an). We are providing information and sticker cards so people can easily locate website for upcoming events. Keep checking back to get updates as we get underway. Countdown - 1 year and 9 months. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: None G. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp, to adjourn the meeting; carried 5-0. 7:45pm I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, March 05, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Page 5 of 7 010 CITY . ■ . CUCAMONGA. ! �l MARCH 1172020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. Page 6 of 7 011 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MARCH 11 , 2020 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA MINUTES RANCHO CUCAMONGA CIVIC CENTER COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. Page 7of7 012 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 22, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 &CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017- 00194 — GEORGE BOTROS, APPLICANT — A request for site plan and architectural review related to the operation of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225- 123-05. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Design Review DRC2017-00193 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The 3.28-acre (143,041 square feet) project site is located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The vacant project site is covered in native and non-native grasses and scrubs. The dimensions of the rectangularly shaped project site are approximately 660 feet from east to west and 216 feet from north to south. The site generally drains from north to south. The street improvements along East and Wilson Avenues adjacent to the project site have not been completed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 013 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194— GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan Single-Family Very Low (VL) Residential District South Residences Very Low Etiwanda Specific Plan East Vacant Land Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes developing a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The two buildings will face each other and will be separated by a common courtyard. The east (rear) elevation of the church will face East Avenue. Access to the project will be from a single driveway off East Avenue with a separate emergency access gate at the terminus of Rolling Pasture Place. A drive aisle will be located around the perimeter of the two buildings, with parking stalls located along both the north, south and west elevations of the two buildings as well as the project perimeter. The applicant will be responsible for constructing East Avenue street improvements which include street paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting. The applicant will also be responsible for paying in-lieu fees to construct one-half of the future Wilson Avenue street improvements along the project frontage. The proposed wall along East Avenue will be required to match the existing East Avenue theme wall (Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan)to the south. The project will also be required to construct the East Avenue Community Entry (Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan), the Community Trail and sidewalk/bike trail along Wilson Avenue (Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) and the landscaping between the north property line and Wilson Avenue, on the land owned by the Metropolitan Water District. The church and social building are designed with a Mediterranean architectural design theme that includes the use of smooth stucco, stone veneer, cast stone accents, and "S" clay tile roof. The church will have a maximum height of 35 feet, which is the maximum height permitted within the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The social building is designed to carry over the design theme of the church, but with a less formal appearance and will have a maximum height of 32-feet and 6-inches. The ground level floorplan for the church (9,400 square feet)will include the main sanctuary, classrooms for Sunday school, bathroom facilities, a meeting room, an office for the priest and a cry room. The second story of the church (2,950 square feet) will include additional Sunday school classrooms. The ground-level floor plan for the social building (14,653 square feet) will include a large open floor plan for gathering and meals along with kitchen facilities, a smaller open gathering area, and bathroom facilities. The second story of the social building (3,380 square feet) will include offices, dressing rooms, storage areas, and bathroom facilities. 014 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194— GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 3 The project complies with each of the related Etiwanda Specific Plan development standards for the Very Low (VL) Residential District as shown on the following table: Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback 35 Feet 78 Feet Yes East Avenue Building Setback 20 Feet 61 Feet Yes North Property Line Building Setback 10 Feet 46 Feet Yes South Property Line Building Setback 20 Feet 139 Feet Yes West property line Parking Setback 15 Feet 38 Feet Yes East Avenue Lot Coverage 40 Percent 18 Percent Yes Building Height 35 Feet Maximum 35 Feet Yes B. Parking: Parking for churches is based on the number of fixed seats in the main sanctuary. In this case, there will be 416 fixed seats in the main sanctuary, which translates into a parking requirement of 139 parking spaces. The proposed church provides 167 parking spaces, 28 parking spaces over the minimum requirement. The applicant has informed staff that the church and social building will not be used concurrently. Land Use Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parkin Church (416 1 Per 3 Seats in Sanctuary 139 Spaces 167 Spaces Seats C. Conditional Use Permit (DRC2017-00194): Section 17.16.120.A of the Development Code states that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only having an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. The proposed church use is defined in Section 17.32.020.C.1 of the Development Code as an "assembly use" which covers permanent meeting facilities for organizations operating on a membership basis including religious organizations. Per the land use table of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, churches are permitted within the Very Low (VL) Residential subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Saint Elias Church will hold services on Sundays between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m., followed by a social gathering/meal in the adjacent social hall. The applicant estimates that attendance for church services, based on their current church attendance in the city of Upland, will be approximately 150 persons along with 75 children, with increased attendance for religious holidays and other special events. The church operation will also include monthly family nights, youth meetings and senior citizen gatherings. Additionally, church members may use the church and social building for weddings, funerals and other related events. These special events currently occur no more than once monthly. 015 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194— GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 4 The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. Fact: The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Very Low and a zoning designation of Very Low (VL) Residential District. Churches are permitted in the Very Low (VL) Residential District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, the project complies with the City's building height, setback, parking, landscape, and architectural standards. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The project site is located in an area dominated by residential land uses. The project site will provide vehicle access from a public street and public utilities are located on or adjacent to the project site. The attached standard conditions include conditions of approval related to parking, noise and light glare to reduce potential impacts on the surrounding residential land uses. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: Environmental studies were prepared by the applicant's consultants reviewing the projects potential impact on the environment related to air quality/greenhouse gasses, biological resources, noise, and traffic. The reports determined that the project would not have a negative impact on the surrounding land uses. D. Trails Advisory Committee: The project was reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee on March 11, 2020. The Committee approved the proposed Wilson Avenue Community Trail alignment. E. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Guglielmo, Williams, and Smith) on March 17, 2020). The Committee recommended that the project move forward as presented to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. F. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant hosted a neighborhood meeting on January 14, 2020. Approximately 18 persons attended the meeting and raised concerns related to traffic, parking and potential noise issues. The church representatives responded that the church currently meets in the city of Upland and has fewer than 200 regular attendees. The proposed site plan includes 167 parking spaces, adequate parking for more than 400 persons. They stated that there would be one service on Sunday mornings and only small group meetings during the week. The church will be the sole user of the social building, which will only be 016 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194— GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 5 used on Sundays for meals after the church service and for special events such as weddings and funerals (for church members only). The church and social building will be constructed to the current building standards, which will reduce the outdoor noise levels to below City standards. There will be no vehicle or pedestrian access (beyond emergency vehicles)to the church from the adjacent cul-de-sac (Rolling Pastures Drive), eliminating potential spillover parking. Staff informed the residents that the proposed church use requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, which can be modified to include new or updated conditions of approval if issues related to the operation of the church use should arise in the future. With the outstanding issues addressed, the residents were supportive of the proposed project. G. Public Art: Per Development Code Section 17.124.020 (Public Art Required), places of worship are exempt from the public art requirement. H. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3)the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan land use and the zoning designation for the project site are Very Low and Very Low (VL) Residential District, respectively, which permits the development and operation of a church subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing residential development and City infrastructure. The following five environmental factors are required to be analyzed to determine that the project qualifies for the Infill Categorical Exemption: a) Traffic: A Trip Generation Memo (Birdseye Planning Group)was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed church use will create an estimated 27 peak hour trips on weekdays and 86 peak hour trips on Sundays. The project's peak hour trips are on Sundays when there is generally minimal vehicle traffic. The proposed church will not negatively impact the operation of the nearest intersections. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group)was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project's construction phase could potentially create a significant or adverse impact. The analysis included three mitigations measures to reduce construction noise levels. With the implementation of these measures, the analysis determined that the project would have a less than significant impact. Conditions of approval to implement these mitigation measures have been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. 017 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194— GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 6 c) Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and a Green House Gas Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group)were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District(SCAQMD)thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A water quality control exhibit (Plumb Engineering) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Assessment Report(Advantage Environmental Consultants)was prepared for the project site. No critical habitat was recorded on the project site. No drainage features occur on the project site and no USFWS designated critical Habitat is located on the project site. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State-listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non-listed special-status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area. The Biological Assessment Report does recommend burrowing owl surveys and a nesting bird survey prior to grading. The requirement to perform these surveys has been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. CALIFORNIA STATE BILL 166 AND 330: The project conforms to the requirements outlined in Senate Bill 166 (SB166) as the development of the project site with a non-residential land use is not necessary for the City to meet the housing numbers obligation under the current RHNA cycle. While the project has been identified in Housing Element's inventory, the City has identified land along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue as potential housing sites to meet the City's RHNA housing requirement. As part of the City's update to the General Plan that is currently underway, additional locations for residential development elsewhere will be evaluated. The project also conforms to requirements outlined in Senate Bill 330 (SB 330), which places limitations on general plan or specific plan amendments reducing the intensity of land use within an existing zoning district. The proposed church use is conditionally permitted under the City's current zoning regulations and does not necessitate changing or modifying the existing General Plan land use designation or zoning ordinances. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site is currently assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, and police services. 018 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 7 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: While no specific City Council goals are addressed, General Plan Policy LU-2.4 encourages complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re-use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The project is for a new church facility on an infill parcel of land The proposed changes will improve the compatibility of the church with the surrounding residential neighborhood by reducing potential noise impacts through the construction of a new auditorium that is designed specifically for the proposed use. The new auditorium will be located near the center of the project site, increasing the physical separation from the adjacent residential land uses. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Colored Elevations Exhibit C - Operations Letter Exhibit D - Trails Advisory Committee Comments (March 11, 2020) and Action Agenda — DRAFT Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Comments (March 17, 2020) and Action Agenda — DRAFT Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2017-00193 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194 019 x S I ELIAS CHURCH VV LSON AVO VICINITY MAP Q N n d W 6'-0' HIGH SPLIT FACE FENCE ALL AROUND n PHILLY DR, ur 660'-0" 4' HIGH BLOCK 6' CUR WALL , STONE DOUBLE HECK LIGHT FIXTURES ?�6'-0' HIGH SPLIT FACE FENCE ALL AROUND VENEER FINISH L DETECTO (DDC) . . . NUMBER SHEET INDEX . . . L•'•.•• 9 AF IN( 10E INC I RK G +. 10 AR ING 0 RK G 9 AR ING FDD L-4F• ••+• d, ¢ •R •� I� DECORATIVE PAVING -. M r_z L l_dL t L i_e I L Y.rir- 4' CEMENT A-01SITE PLAN SEE LANSCAPING PLANS; FMR PAVINGi A-1 CHURCH FIRST FLOOR PLAN ADA ACCESSIBILTY ROUTS Q ADA ACCESSIBILTY ROUTS DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE A-2 CHURCH SECOND FLOOR PLAN AND ROOF PLAN T Tjej - HANDICAPPED PARKING _ ce_fe SLIP RESITANT A-3 CHURCH ELEVATIONS 5, A-4 CHURCH SECTIONS 'i 8 P IN �, 8 AR ING •a••• .I A-5 SOCIAL BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN :� �'� _ - ,,, , SOCIAL BUILDING SEC❑ND FL❑❑R PLAN AND RO❑F PLAN a' I �e u n � u n u-:-u, •'_'::_:.;:_.: IC PEDE;STRIAN� A-6 € Ij — -� � — EXIT A-7 SOCIAL BUILDING ELEVATI❑NS •a� L I `� A-8 SOCIAL BUILDING SECTIONS + lL-1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN TRASH ENCLOSURE 5 451-0TJ •� 51 � / r1 ' NEW SOCIAL BUILDING EXIT - v EXIT ,. NEW CHURCH � � b 12 50 F 3 S :• . . . 18033 SF , I I • I 1- CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN . W o.. '' 2- CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ••o• :•'':•: :•: 3- CUT AND FILL EXHIBIT LOADING , , , , . , . , . , :•:.:•:•:•:• 4- SECTI❑NS •I ° ' .�4'.' 5- SITE UTILIZATION MAP :I 6- PRELIMINARY WQMP SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN KI G °, 9 JRK�G P�Rfll 1 . . LIGHT FIXTURES TYP,— 24 • LIGHT FIXTURES TYP, •I� SEE GRADING PLANS SHT 1 • • • • u / O Lf WROUGHT IRON Y - FIRE ACCESS GATE •• •� • ¢ THE WAL� WILL BE CONSTRUCTED PER REQUIRMENT OF THE EAST AVE; THEME WALL, if, 13 w IA S I T E PLAN 6'-0' HIGH SPLIT FACE FENCE ALL AROUND N SCALE 1 /32 = 1 "'-0 BUILDING CODE INFORMATION CURRENT CODE:_ 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 2019 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE 2019 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE CHURCH BUILDING 2019 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE 2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE FIRST FLOOR 9400 SF 2019 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE SECOND FLOOR 2950 SF 12350 SF -CONSTRUCTION- TYPE V-A COMPETELY FIRE SPRINKLED AND FIRE ALARM SOCIAL BUILDING FIRST FLOOR 14653 SF SECOND FLOOR 3380 SF OCCUPANCY GROUP A-3 18033 SF OCCUPANNT LOAD 416 PERSONS BUILDING WILL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH EXTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS , WINDIWS , DOORS, AND FIXED SEATING NUMBERS -416 DRC2017 - 001 J4 VENTILATION OPENINGS PER CBC CHAPTER 7A PARKING REQUIRED 139 167 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED LOT AREA 141900 SF TOTAL FIRST FLOOR AREA 24053 SF SITE PLAN OWNER: TOTAL PORCH AREA 1634 SF 5734 East Av //jo ST ELIA5 CHURCH +* c-zzaei a' COVERED AREA 25687 SF 18.1 % GB ARCHITECTS ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING PROJECT# SCALE LANDSCAPING AREA 22000 SF 15% 4GO N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 1-10-17 1/32"=1'-0" A- 0 2-19-19 6-24-19 CD 2-21-2Q20 rB C D A-4 A-4 A-4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 151'-9" 27'-7" 31'-6" 71'-8" 16'-10" 4'-2" 1'4, 13'-5" 3'-7" 19'-0" 8'-11" 6'-3" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" 6'-8" 25'-7" IIIIIIII 0 o IIIIIIII 404OF + ARCH U a) I RAMP o \\\1 MEETING RM 5I �' 10'-6" HIGH Q o i C-) + I I + o w 3080 �� 1 �� I 406 F+ARCH 4060 +ARCH 406OF ARCH 406OF ARCH 4060 +ARCH 406OF ARCH �r i cd:: SUNDAY SCHOOL 14-0" HIGH 3080 16'-0" HIGH " ---------------- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ---- -- -- -- -- -- --------------------60--80-- lIIIII�I-iIIIIII ------ 3080 LIBRARY. 6'-8" C) r-0 IIIII DRESSING Q0 23'-7 22'-6" ---------- L 308 0 0 0 o (.0 C.07080 0�0 3- -------------- 3 3" 18' PORCH FIRST FLOOR 25'-0" HIGH 7080 lobby 14'-0" HIGH o1Ir EXIT EXIT CD 8080 SANCTUARY ALTER I -------- 30'-0" HIGH 28'-0" HIGH 7080 --AA-- 4- �I II II II 7080 o C) II I 1 I 00 `D `D II -------------- -------- - =::===:=2 - - - - - - - =::=::==:=7 - - - ------------� -- 308 ------- ----------- L------- p cD 3080 - - - - - - - - - o I � DRESSING N CRY O"RM L-------- `r HIGH 3080 o� 6080 3080 16'-0" HIGH _ i 0 SUNDAY SCHOOL 3080 /�� \�� /�/ \�� 4060F+ARCH 4060F+ARCH 4060F+ARCH 4060F+ARCH 4060F+ARCH 4060F+ARCH N ¢ 14'-0" HIGH + �- 1 WOMEN. 1 � = I D' -c' o w / �� ��14'-0" "IGH �/ U z o 1 - PRIEST + o OFFICE o 10'-6" HIGH o 1 UP 404OF + ARCH �i 0 0 1 I IIIIIIII � � IIIIIIII IIIIIIII I I � I I � I I � I I � I I � I I � I I � rB rc D A-4 A-4 A-4 DRC2017 - 001 J4 CHURCH FIRST FLOOR PLAN CHURCH OWNER: FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE ST ELIAS CHURCH * � C-22961 N * 1/8"=1'-0" GP ARCHITECTS � �F°CAy� ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING DATE: SCALE 400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 6-10-17 1/8"=1'-0" UPLAND, CA, 91786 2-19-19 A - 1 o (909�E249 - 6999 FAX (909) 949-2928 6-24-19 2-21-2020 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I 0 o \ / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � / I A-4 3080 1 I I o \\\ I SUNDAY S(HOOL I / o I1'-0" HIGH / I N m 57< I I / A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J SUNDAY SCH00 / 2020E 2020E 2020E 2020E 2020E 202OF 3080 \ / rn I 43080 / \ r /SUNDAY SCHOOLL - - - - - - - - 111'-0" HIGH / I 15'-0" HIGH Zo o N - - - - - - - - - - J I // I II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - co I— i I - U-j Ln I ii I CD co I I ii I I I ii ii I ii I x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — Io - - - - - - - - - ------ FLAT ROOF ABOVE -� oom N ALTER ----------� - -------lobby - - A - F I ico 11 -0 i SANCTUARY I 28'-0" HIGH 30'-0" HIGHF1 I I ii I I I � I I ii I I I ii I o -i -i I I ii I °° ILJI1 i 3080 I \Ln \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � I \\ r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - * - - - N SUNDAY SCHOOL \ I I \ 11'-1 HIGH \\ r i 3080 SUNDAY SCHOOL 80 — � - - \10780`" 1 -0" HIGH 202_0E _ - - - - _202_0E- - - - - _202_0E - - - - _20_20E_ - - - - _202_0E- - - - - _20_20E w SUNDAY SCHOOL _ - - - - - � I I \ I I I I o ^-d- / ll'-\O" HIGH \\ / I F F - — — — — — — — — - // I I 0 o ric I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � A-4 CHURCH SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/8"=11'-o" CHURCH OWNER: 4L. goa SECOND FLOOR PLAN N AND ROOF PLAN ST ELIAS CHURCH * C-22961 ry, GB ARCHITECTS �'�' �F°cAti��° ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING DATE: SCALE 400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 6-10-17 A UPLAND, CA, 91786 2-19-19 (909�ER49 - 6999 FAX (909) 949-2928 6-24-19 2-21-2020 STUCCO OVER FOAM BOARD CLAY TILES 0000000000 000000 00====00000 p00000 p0000 p p0000 �000 p ==oo p p0000 ==oo p poop p poop p =______ C�C� DDD DDD DDD pppp==_E :j========E j========Eppppppp Q =poo p poop p poop p pppp___ � C�C� r DDD DDD ppppppp pppppppp pppppppp ppppppp o C�C� DDD DDD DDD ppppppp pppppppp pppppppp ppppppp 0o SMOOTH STUCCO =pppp o0o SMOOTH STUCCO o00 ppppppp pppppppp pppppppp ppppppp =poo poop p poop p pppp__ ==o poop p poop p o op DDD DDD __= pppppppp pppppppp p p C� DDD DDD Cp pppp pppppppp pppppppp pp p C� DDD DDD Cp pppp pppppppp pppppppp pp p o ppo poop p poop p o� p pp0 =000 p poop= E: 1==1 ==0 0000 p poop p �� p C� DDD DDD Cp pppp pppppppp pppppppp _ pp p CLAY TILES SLOPE 4:12 o000o p poop= o - o00 000 - o pppp== --- ------- ---- --------- CpCpCp -- 14------ STUCCO OVER FOAM BOARD =®®0 0000 p ®CpCp DDD pp®oo ppp000 ----------- HILL COUNTRY STONE =pppp®pop =pppppppp -------- _==_® pp®®p� pppp=== ==pppp o® ®o0 000 000 pppp® =pppp®pppp pppppppp== ==pppp CHURCH y �� T� � � FRONT � �� � �� o® ®o0 000 00o pppp® = opo®® opo ppppppppppp ==pppp Ind/ 'lll�JI VATION ( EAST ) �® pp®®per®pppp==®000 poop o® ®oo®oo®0000 000 - p=pppp =======p=pp=====_=====p=p=p=== ==pppp 000 00000000000000 000 » ==pppp =ppppppppppp LL--i 000 000000000 000 ==pppp =pppppppp =pppppppp ==pppp 000 000 �oo0 000 ==pppp pppppppp pppppppp ==pppp -- -------- 000I I I I 000 000 ==pppp ppppppp ppppppp ==pppp -------- 000 00 000 000 ==pppp ppppppp ==pppp ==pppp 000 00 000 000 ==pppp ==pppp ==pppp ==pppp 000 00 000 000 ==pppp =00000 ==pppp ==pppp 0I I 0 0E- 000 0000 000 00 000 000 0 ==pppp ==pppp ==pppp ==pppp o=o= ===o=o :1==1=I=1=I=E 1=1=I=1=I=1=IE 0001 110 000 000 ==pppp ==pppp ==pppp ==pppp 000 00 000 000 p ==pppp ==pppp ==pppp 00 000 000 ==pppp ==pppp ==pppp 00 000 000 p pppp PRECAST CONCRETE HILL COUNTRY STONE PRECAST CONCRETE CHURCH RIE AIS ELEVATION ( WEST )_ 1/8" =114" CLAY TILES SLOPE 4:12 oo= _=_=_=_=___________ oo= o00 0000= 000 0000000 000 0000 pppppppp =ppppppppppppppppppp3 1-3 =pppp pppppppp 000 0000 000 0000 STUCCO OVER �AM ==pppp pppppppp BOARD o00 0000 000 0000 pppppppp ppp pppppppppppppppp ppppppp ==pppppppp 000 00 0 0000000000 poo ppp ppp poop==moo p ==o X =o p == ==000==moo p ==o11 ME =o =poo poop==moo p ppp ILo 0 0 00000 0 ji 0 Lo 0 0001 L 0 00 0 0 00000 L0 0 o SMOOTH STUCCO ===0000 p�o= 0 == ==L-JL-JL-J====== o p o 0 0000 0 pp ppp pppppppppppppppp p 0 0001 11 11 0 0 p= ppp pppppppppppppppp p 0 0000 0L 0 pp ppp =pppppppppppppppp p � 0 0 00000 00 0 = 0 00I L 0 =o ==o==-o ppo= o � � o p PRECAST CONCRETE HILL COUNTRY STONE SIDE ELEVATION ( SOUTH ) DRC2017 - 00194 1/8" =1 '-0" G L. bob 04 1� CHURCH ELEVATIONSv N * C-2296 GXB ARCHITECTST ELIAS CHURCH ��o�ocAtil�� ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING DATE: SCALE 0 400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 6-10-17 2-19-19 w 6-24-19 2-21-2020 FLAT ROOF /AC I CD lobby Ln ro I 0 N CD O , 00 N I N N PORCH LobbCD � Y ALTER 31'-0" CHURCH SECTION A - A SCALE 1/8"=1'-0" CD 0 I I 00 00 N N O I CHURCH ALTER SECTION D - D SCALE 1/8"=1'-0" _o I in 0 0 0 I I 1 i2 i2 i2 O CD I o o N 1 (O N O O �T � � II o c"i C14 O O o II O O O OI II � I II � I II � I II CHURCH SECTION B - B CHURCH SECTION C - C SCALE 1/8„=1'-0” SCALE 1/$„=1°-0° DRC2017 - 001 J4 OWNER: � 4G bo CHURCH SECTIONSN ST ELIAS CHURCH * C-22961 1p �s CSB ARCHITECTS pp 01.31- CAti1� ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING DATE: SCALE 400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 6-10-17 1/8”=1'-0" o UPLAND, CA, 91786 2-19-19 A— 4 A (909�E249 - 6999 FAX (909) 949-2928 6-24-19 2-21-2020 181'-1" 27'-6" 49'-3" 27'-6" 49'-3" 27'-6" 8'-0" 5'-9" 5-9" 8'-0" 21'-3" 15'-6" 12'-6" 8'-0" 5-9" 5'-9" 8'-0" 12'-6" 15'-6" 21'-2" 8'-0" 5-9" 5-9" 8'-0" B 3'aw ARCI �-8 0 0 I I I i2 i� I I TEA/COFF WET BAR 12' 12' I I I I I L[7 Ln 3'WM I 3'OWI ARCH I I I `V I 8'-0" I � � 8'-0" 5080E+ARCH I 5090E+ARCH 5090F+ARCH 5090F+MCH BOBOF O O I C14 cli O O 00 00 WASHING c SITTING 12'-0" HIGH I I I I ;n I I I m x_ EXIT MANAGEMENT o 0 I +W o 0 I I COOKING 0 0I I I I I I N, o EATING/ SOCIAL G/ SOC IAL ,° r RECEPTION O u I I i 25' HIGH AARE EXIT ° I I EXIT I I 00 I ---- -------- -- --- ------ PREPERATION CO ' HIGH ' It i / / 00 A --—————————— -- ------— ---- � � / / A-8 A-8 12' HIGH � 1 \\ \ �A DRY STORco co I I DRY STORAGE 12'-0" HIGH I co I � C.0 co 0 I � co co EXIT o COOLER DRY STORAGE I ' I ,096E O CD I \\ m \\ x I 01 LI Lo i COOLER I I I co 00 REST RM , I I I c I o 0 o DRESSING 89_0• 0908'-0I 00 00 SOBOF+ARCH I 5F+ARCH , 5090E+ARCH 5W 608OF GO I t12-o" I IGF N Lo LoI CO � t� M�N� 3'MM ARCH I I cfl I I I I O PIWYtO Fr o 0' ' A-8 3'OWI MCI DRC2017 - 00194 SOCIAL BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE SOCIAL BUILDING OWNER: SCALE 8a � 1/8"=V-0" FIRST FLOOR PLAN N AND ROOF PLAN ST ELIAS CHURCH *tJr�' C-22961 GB ARCHITECTS °CAti�° ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING DATE: SCALE 400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 6-10-17 UPLAND, CA, 91786 2-19-19 A - 5 cn (909E@49 - 6999 FAX (909) 949-2928 2-2�-2020 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I \ / o� B I \\ A-8 I OFFICE / OFFICE I / I 27'-V I Y = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,I F\ /� I I / ro OFFICE DRESSING 9'-0" HIGH \ / L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J, \ / - - - I - — 5090E+ARCH 5090F+ND \ \ // / 5090E+ARCH 5090F+ARCH // I I \\_ _ _ _ I O I \ N • I I I OFFICE L \ � o \\ \►' // y It HALLWAY o 0 CD 0 / I I \ / =0 - - - - - - - - - - - - T AD INSTRATI co \\ // I OPEN BELOW I I OPEN bj��OW I I oO r' M c A 0000 �OO� Ll. I I 31 - 3 I =0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - o HALLWAYn STORAGE / \\ I "' o o Ln // \ \ - - - - - - - - - - - / // \\ ---------------\tel - - - - — - ------------- cD \ I 5990E+ARCH 5080F+WH I I I \ I I I MEW \ I L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —\� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I I \\ I _ o n Ico - 0 ❑ ❑ \\ HIGH I\ I /; yV;OMEN, io I \ o A-8 [Z- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - y SOCIAL BUILDING SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1/8"=1'-0" DRC2017 - 00194 SOCIAL BUILDING OWNER: L Rn� SECOND FLOOR PLAN �U4 � e0� � AND ROOF P LAN ST ELIAS CHURCH * C-22961 N q?�, • of GB ARCHITECTS O -3 w F CAti��° ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING DATE: SCALE 400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 6-10-17 1/8"=1'-0" o UPLAND, CA, 91786 2-19-19 ' 6-24-19 (909�E@49 - 6999 FAX (909) 949-2928 2-21-2020 oo=0000000=0000000 000000000000000000 00000000 00I I I 000 00000=0000 0 =oo=__=====o0 0 00000 00 00000 0000 Co 000000 00 0 0 F t 1 0 QQQQ1 1 :1 jl 00000 00 ====0 0000 Co 000000 00 �= oo oo == l I I III -==== = -=_ 00000 0000 00 000000 000 0 00 00 0 000 _==========oo===o0 000000000000000000 00000000 00000000 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 00000000 1 1 L I 00 000000000000000000 000000000000000000 00000000 00000000 oo=000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000000 o=====_____=====o0 000000000000000000 00000000 00000000 oo=0000000=0000000000000000000000000 00000000 00000000 oo=0000000=0000000 SMOOTH STUCCO 000000000000000000 00000000 00000000 oo=0000000=0000000 00000000 000000000 00000000 000 0000 oo=000000000000000 0000000 0000000000 00000000 000 0000 00=000®0000000000 0000000 0000000000 --------------------------------------------------------------- HILL COUNTRY STONE SOCIAL BUILDING REAR ELEVATION STUCCO OVER FOAM CLAY TILES SLOPE 4:12 BOARD O R30 INSULATION O0 00000 0 00000000 000000000000000000000 SOUND PROOF BOARDo 000000000000 Co STUCCO OVER FOA BOARD OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 5/8�� DRYWALL =000000000000000 0 0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0= 00"�"�"�"FOAM00000 00000 000000 00000 00000000000 0000000000 0000000000 00000000000 0 00 0000 00000 00 0 0 0000 0000 000000000 000000000 0000 0000 � 0 00 0000 0000 0 0 a, 0000 0000 00000000 00000000 0000 =0=0 0 00000 0000 l I 0 N 0000 0000 000000= ======o =_== 0000 M o 00 000 000 00 0 o=== ==== 0000000 ======o F-1 0000 00 00 000 000 00 00 o=========0 0000000 =0=0=00 ==========o 0 00000 000 0 000 00000� ooh 0000000 00 00000 00000 00000 3 LAY E R S OF GLAZING 00000 000 000 00000C 00000000000 0000000 0000000 00000000000 00000000000 0000000 0000000 00000000000 0 00000 000 000 00000C � 00000000000 0000000 0000000 00000000000 �, 0 00000 000 0 000 00000 000000000000000000 0000000 00000000000 C�C�C� C�C�C� C�C�C�C�C�C 00000000000 0000000 0000000 00000000000 0 00000 � ==C 000 0 000 00000 N 2X12 WOOD STUD SOCIAL BUILDING FRONT ELEVATION SECTI ❑ N A - A A CLAY TILES SLOPE 4:12 CLAY TILES SLOPE 4:12 0000®000000®000000®ooC000 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 0I I F-- 00000C-7 0000000000000 0E--7 000000 o==o®ooC000®ooC000®ooC000 SMOOTH STUCCO o000000000000000000000000o SMOOTH STUCCO 00000000000000000000000000 oo®0000®0000®oo0 0 0000000000000 0000000000000 0000000000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 0000®ooCoo 000®ooC000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 0000000000 � 0 00000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 N 0000®ooCo o®ooC000 000000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0000000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000®ooC o®ooC000 00000000 0000000 0000000 00000000 N 0000 000 000 0000 0000 000 00000000 C�000000 0000000 0000000 00000== 0000000 00000000 C�000000� 0000000 0000000 0000000 ® 0000000 00000000 C�000000� 0000000 0000000 0000000 0000000 oo�oo ®00 0� o0 00000 00000 000 0 00 000 CSC-C� 0000®oo C�000000� 0000000 0000000 0000000 0000000 0000®oo C�000000� 0000000 SMOOTH STUCCO 0000000 0000000 SMOOTH STUCCO 0000000 C�C�C� C�C�C� 0000®oo C�000000� 0000000 0000000 0000000 0000000 i L 11 0000®oo C�000000� - 0000000 0000000 00===== 0000000 =1 =E 1: 0000®oo Ci000000� 0000000 0000000 0000000 000 000 000 0000� 000 000 000 0 -- --- -------------------------------- ----- --------- RIVER ROCK STONE PRECAST CONCRETE L PRECAST CONCRETE D" 'R C 2 0 17 0 0 1 '%'-D 4 SIDE ELEVATION ( SOUTH ) ELEVATE N ( NORTH SIM . ) G L 40 `j 0 Ao J, ELEVATIONS * C-22961 N ST ELIAS CHURCH OUB ARCHITECTS oF0c511 ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING DATE: SCALE 400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 6-10-17 A e 2-19-19 0 6-24-19 2-21-2020 — ----------------------------- ----------------------- 0 I O O N O I I I rn vi m cfl I -, F o SECOND FLOOR I I o I I N N N N N EATING AREA EATING AREA EATING AREA RECEPTION 0 0 I I N N KITCHEN AREA FlRST FLOOR SOCIAL BUILDING SECTION A-A SCALE \ / I I / / L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -J IF - - - - - - - - I-- - - - -/- - - -r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -�- - - , III - - - - - - - - - - I f I I I FLAT ROOF I I I I - - - - - - - - �I � — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � I II I I I ir I 1 II I I I I I L L - - - - - - - - - - - - - -I— � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -L - - - - - - NI- - - J � _ — — N N EATING AREA I \ \\ \ I I �\ \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I / I SOCIAL BUILDING SECTION B - B CHURCH ROOF PLAN SCALE 1/8"=1'-0" F - - - - - - - - - SCALE I \ / \ / k - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J\ \ / /L RAFTERS I \ / 2X— BLOCKING / \ / I I \\ METAL FLASHING STUCCO METAL GUTTER \ o \ I I STUCCO OVER FOAM `r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BOARD Ir - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � I I II I I I II I I II FLAT ROOF FLAT ROOF I II I I I II I I I II I I SECTION B -B SCALE N.T.S. - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- I I I DRC201 '7 - 00194 J SOCIAL BUILDING OWNER: �� 4 L. 80 � �' \\ S E C TI O N S ST ELIAS CHURCH * C-22961 - - - - - - - - - � V '�1� SOCIAL BUILDING ROOF PLAN GB ARCHITECTS 01-g' SCALE of CA1�� 1/16"-1'-0" ARCHITECTURE . PLANNING . ENGINEERING DATE: SCALE 400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208 6-10-17 AS SHOWN o UPLAND, CA, 91786 2-19-19 A - 8 6-24-19 00 (909�E249 - 6999 FAX (909) 949-2928 2-21-2020 SHEET INDEX: 1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CONC TUAL SIT LAN 2 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 3 - CUT AND FILL EXHIBIT 4 SECTIONS PLANS / DETAILS 5 SITE UTILIZATION MAP �p OO��p D I I III 6 PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN VICINITY MAP APN : 0225- 112-05-0-00 N.T.$. GOLDEN � SITE AREAS: RIDGECREST DR PRAIRIE DR. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA - 4444 GROSS: 143,053.60 SF F� N. OVERLOOK / NET: 132,361 .20 SF �p DR DISTURBED AREA: 132,361 .20 SF IMPERVIOUS AREA: 120,275.80 SF CD w C o SITE PLAN F�qS POP F T WILSOU AVE WILSON AVE m m D OD cn SPLIT REIN DR y Nq m z RNESS c /' 0Arr _-- �' m - - CHALLENDON DR D 1630 C, =--- T_� D e _ _ U) D m ETIWANDA HUNT CLUB DR F1_1 23RD ST 23RD ST CREEK PARK o o ---- ETIWANDA CREEK N BEND CT COMMUNITY & d -_-_ ,-,-, 1630 16 _ --_-_ CHURCHILL DR DOG PARK E UESTR 1625 --------- ------------ AMBER LANE z 04 y c Cn 1625 _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - -_-_-_ D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_ - -_- - - - -_- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_- - -_- --_-- - _-_-_ ------_-_ ______ -______ - - -_- -__ ---___--______-___-- -_-_-__ _= L=l��'S = - A =_ _ ---_-_--_-_-_________-________- < m D -_-_-_-_- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- --------------------------------- ----- -_---- _ --_-_- _---_---- - --_-_-_---_-------------------_-_---_-_-__-_ -___-�7 p-n:;���77-i- 7, _-_ ---_ -P- T1f L - - - r- _-__ ---- ------- - - - - ---_- -__- -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_---_ --------_-_-_------- ---------- m < - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------- -------------- ------------------ ------ ------- - _-_-_ _-_-_ _-_-_- - - - -_-_--_-_-_- - -_-=---=N891 -6 J4_E- - - - - - - - --_-_ -_-_-_- - - - - - - - - - - - m - - - - - - - - - - - -_- _-_-_- - - - - - .... ..................... ....... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIO - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ::...... zVAR AZ' .:.:.:.: BANYAN ST. BANYAN S BANYAN ST. BANYAN ST. EXIST S 90 00 10 ST 0. 0- ® AC O BENCHMARK BLOCK WALL EXIST LL ® P VD A 0 �� 1. (TO REMAIN) BLOCK WALL _-- - _ .. - .... _ ... a, �1 r- PROP 101 P ao PROP ROP. POP. W (TO REMAIN) HT POLE LIG , 62ti 6ti OLE PO ,� LIGHT P LIGHT 61 ROP. 6� GHT POLE - c° LI 142.96 o LIGHT P - - -- 1z Al 14 o ;; I LES 9=7 TA ::::� RB & 1 18 ER �n 0 w - - EXIST 04 88. 8 Exrsr. RESIDENCE J ,Liiiii...: :ii -- ii- iii.---.- �a N J J � O ----- DRI VEWA Y PROPOSED 6FT HIGH J I EDS IAN o f EXIST. SLUPSTONE SCREEN WALL ,� Q,', cv 8 RESIDENCE o A C NEER EXIST �6, P p,.1LOS. 6/L RESIDENCE , 6.00 , R W o�oboe o P d 71111F IA '�' 3 4 ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY WILL NEED TO BE EXIST F H 4 ED DEDICATED ALONG EAST AVE. EAST AVE. SHALL EPB N 18' 18' ¢ . IMPROVED FULL WIDTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EX/ST 128.57 N- o CITY SECONDARY ARTERIAL (88 RIGHT-OF-WAY) DRIVEWAY EXIST. �n 615 STANDARDS & FIGURE 5-28 OF THE ETIWANDA Exrsr. E EXIST a u u o 156 E PROPERTY LINE uj SPECIFIC PLAN BETWEEN THE SOUTH PROJECT DRI VEWA Y EXIST :�:�: oo rn =; `:86:fi w.M a 1 1 u SMH EXIST »>:: :: :: ; :: :: ».:> BOUNDARY TO WILSON AVE. SEE DETAIL HEREON. �,�� EQUESTRIAN TRAI ............ ..... . .. ©...::::: ° ILO DRI VEWA Y 6 g 7 ,. Exrsr. oo, RESIDENCE 11 11 ,6� 8 S ® 9 2. 0 05 R T SED RATIO BASIN 9.67 S LL 9 72 ;� 6 0 OP. - o_ _ EXISTING RIGH OF - - EXIST -- I .,6"--.. -- - --- ANH L REMAIN) WAY 0 CL OF GA TE (TO REMAIN) O P PROP �6 � o �.. UTILITY INFORMATION: T P LI H T POLE LIGHT PTPROPFT D E .......... .. .................... ............ STON z (ELECTRICITY) EXIST °SCREEN WALL o SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON EXIST �� GA TE (TO REMAIN) EXIST. \141C / w NDERGROUND OLE POPS D C SIDE DR IN W Q PH: (800)655-4555 EXIST o� DRI VEWA Y GU ER - UTLET PER 107-A MZ � � RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPALITY UTILITY W.M PH: 909 919-2612 EXIST FH ,� ROPOSED FI PROTECT IN PLACE UESTRIA Xl T U W ( ) DRIVEWAY RESIDENCE ���� o E UESTRIAN 6FT HIGH LO NOTE: ANY MODIFICATION TO TRAIL EXIST (T C E F/N LL TRAIL XIST. GATE To EM z SLUPSTONE THE EXISTING TRAIL /S . BLOCK WALL ( ( 2 ) z (GAS) M EXIST. (TO REMAIN)SCREEN WAL ~ Z SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS 00 WALL (TO REMAIN) CONNECTION WILL REQUIRE HT POLE (TO REMAIN) BASIS OF BEARINGS APPROVAL BY THE TRAILS n 0 E REL TED) � XIST PB (TO EMAI THE CENTERL/NE OF EAST A VENUE PER TRACT MAP NO. w W U W PH: (800)427-2200 COMMITTEE n OTECT IN PLA `D E UESTRIAN 16113 RECORDED /N BOOK 301, PAGES 14 THROUGH 17 W W W WATER Exrsr. �/�AI XIST (WATER) THE EXISTING TRAIL N LEGEND: POOL MOTE: ANY MODI 4�+� 0 TRAIL PB (TO REMAI OF TRACT MAPS, BEING z z o xrsr. 50.00 X/ST M..� Z Z � CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT mm' EXISTING FLOW DIRECTION '� CONNECTION WILL REQUIRE NORTH 00°13'40" EAST U M PH: 909 987-2591 'ESIDENCE RESIDENCE DRIVE APP OACH .00' 25.0 ' PB (T REMAI z ( ) ,� APPROVAL BY THE TRAILS RESIDENCE & SIDEWALK 36.00BENCHMARK : W W w COMMITTEE EXIST z ,� > O PER CITY STD /ST B.F. V�,( 0 REM N) �.T.� Z (� (CABLE TV) F 0 RE AlN EXIST COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO Z Exrsr. PLAN N0101 a z a TIME WARNER CABLE °o a ADA PATH OF TRAVEL ) RESIDENCE TYPE "C" BENCHMARK N0: 10089A U PH: (888)892-2253 EXIST J F.H ( REMA ) 1. W U CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS EXIST CURB RAMP Exrsr. XIST U PH: (866)499-8080 MAILBOX RESIDENCE P 0 RE -� SET 2.5 BRASS DISK NORTHWEST CORNER OF v� M PARKING LOT LIGHTING (LIGHT POLE) F F x M VERIZON � NORTHERL Y CA TCH BASIN A T THE NORTHWEST CORNER Z pl ul Exrsr. OF EAST AVE. & BANYAN 35' f NORTH OF THE BCR O PH: (800)VERIZON W RESIDENCE �.,� 01511 C/� , Q W WEXIST ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVE. STAMPED RANCHO (REFUSE) EXIST. RESIDENCE CUCAMONGA BENCHMARK 10089A" BURRTEC DISPOSAL EXIST DRIVEWAY EXIST EXIST PH: (909)987-3717 W M. 14.88' Q Q_ YEAR LEVELED 2010 ( ) 17,29 DRI VEWA Y DRI VEWA Y o� � ELEVA TION: 1510.427 FT W EXIST Z ADJUST ELEVA TION: A = 2.3 FT »�, c.e. Exrsr. � ,► NOTES: HARNESS pR. 16 SS' DRI VEWA Y REXIST ESIDENCE ABBREVIATIONS : 1 . BASE LINE ROAD FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH "MAJOR IST EXIST AIC - ASPHALT PAVEMENT I VEWA Y I o PHIL Y DRIVE BIW - CENTERLINE OFALK ARTERIAL" STANDARDS, EXIST DRIVEWAY v> INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: EXIST EXIST C.B. Q CLF - CHAIN LINK FENCE - I f DRI VEWA Y DRI VEWA Y o f W A. PROVIDE CURB AND GUTTER, PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT SIDEWALK, STREET TREES, Street 2296• FHE`L - EASTERLY .�'I FH - FIRE HYDRANT ACCESS RAMPS AND ASPHALT PAVEMENT, AS REQUIRED. 1�e25 EARTHWORK: FL - FLOW LINE B. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED 36 FEET FROM BASE LINE ROAD _ mud{1-gunk FILL: 31800 CY GA - GUY ANCHOR CENTERLINE. �Irne Mize�?�}• So�C men. EXIST EXIST MH - MANHOLE C. NO DRIVEWAYS SH-11 BE CONSTRUCTED ON BASE LINE ROAD FRONTAGE. ( ardnTa)"�e,NF_ CUT: 33322 CY INV - INVERT D. PROVIDE TWO (2) 9500 LUMENS HPSV STREET LIGHTS ON BASE LINE ROAD INCLUDING IMPORT: 478 CY DRIVEWAY a MON. - MONUMENT Z ONE (1) STREET LIGHT THAT WILL REPLACE A STREET LIGHT ON A WOODEN POLE. I MW - MONITORING WELL Q E. PROVIDE AND PROTECT R26 "NO PARKING" SIGNS AND TRAFFIC STRIPING AND 1+ I EXIST �� EXIST N.A.P. - NOT A PART - SIGNAGE, AS REQUIRED. p, + i25 � EARTH WORK QUANTITIES ARE RAW ESTIMATES ONLY. THEY DO NOT REFLECT SUBSIDENCE, OR ANY CURB RAMP EXIST CURB RAMP NG - NATURAL GROUND J Z F. PROTECT, MODIFY OR RELOCATE EXIST. TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT. AS REQUIRED. ��ree-5 MATERIAL GENERATED BY UTILITY TRENCHING AND BUILDING FOOTINGS. THE QUANTITIES SHOWN EXIST EXIST RESIDENCE N'LY - NORTHERLY a M G. RECONSTRUCT PORTIONS OF CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK EAST OF STREET "A" FOR ABOVE ARE INTENDED FOR USE IN ESTABLISHING GOVERNING AGENCY FEES. CONTRACTOR SHALL DRIVEWAY EXIST I PP - POWER POLE C.B. EXIS . LL rn DRI VEWA Y S'L Y - SOUTHERLY O - Q TRANSITION PURPOSES. BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING THE QUANTITIES FOR BID PURPOSES. ANY EXPORT OR IMPORT DRI Vi WAY SMH - SEWER MANHOLE O J H. PROVIDE A SIGNING AND STRIPING PLAN FOR BASE LINE ROAD . REQUIRE TO BALANCE THE SITE SHALL BE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. EXIST SN - SIGN O Q � SD EXl T ST LT - STREET LIGHT �♦ ' U w O 2. EXIST. POWER POLES ON BASE LINE ROAD AND BERYL STREET SHALL BE RELOCATED, RW PROPOSED GRA STLPB - STREETLIGHT PULLBOX V♦ O Q Z _j TO BE PAID FOR AND COORDINATED BY THE DEVELOPER WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 70' 78.07' 6FT HIGH SLUPSTONE SW - SIDEWALK C,4 ('� w U EDISON COMPANY. FUTURE SCREEN WALL TC - TOP OF CURB J 1 LANDSCAPING FUTURE 12.2' 11.5' PROPOSED EXIST W'L Y - WESTERL Y Z Q FUTURE WILSON AVE. FUTURE FUTURE Q 0 cn O 3. VERIFY EXIST. ACCESS RAMP AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND nI I• SIDEWALK FUTURE FUTURE LANDSCAPING SIDEWALK FUTURE CURB DRI VEWA EXisT WFN - WOOD FENCE Q z BERYL STREET FOR CONFORMANCE TO ADA REQUIREMENTS AND TO CITY STD. 102. J�- NEIGHBORHOOD ENTRY 4' 8,7' CURB & GUTTER 65,9 CURB & GUTTER 44,7' 8' EQUESTRIAN POOL N Q w O OTHERWISE RECONSTRUCT ACCESS RAMP TO CURRENT CITY STD. 100-B AND 102 AND5� 1 2 TRA O (� ti U HAVE A SURFACE APPLIED TRUNCATED DOME DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACE AS 701-0 Typical Concept _ a _ _ _,,, „ _ - „_„_,,, - Z p U SUPPLIED BY ADA SOLUTIONS, INC. OR APPROVED EQUAL. _-il - _ _ _ _ _ __ _ M,101=1 _11 - _ -—-_--_-_ - - - 11 11 _ II- ”' "'�FUTUR _ _ _ �L, -ii=il� i �� ��� E �� ' III ��i I ���_-- - I I I —III I III -11 —11=I—I�jjrI—I 11-III-1 -1TI-1 11-I h I Tu�u hl In l I u H —' — U O 4. BERYL STREET FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH COLLECTOR - - - LANDSCAPING - �_ ANbSCAPING BENCHMARK Q 0 z -'�� � �� �� ��� �� r WILSON AVE . � PROPOSED � = z RESIDENTIAL" STANDARDS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: SECTION G-G AC PAVEMENT z Z A. PROVIDE CURB AND GUTTER, PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT SIDEWALK, STREET TREES AND �d m� r A NTS O < ASPHALT PAVEMENT, AS REQUIRED treetyfW A, {rec� rfr, B. CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED 22 FEET FROM BERYL STREET CENTERLINE. \ RW U C. PROVIDE "HAMMERHEAD" DRIVEWAY APPROACH TO BERYL STREET. EXISTING EXISTING D. PROVIDE AND PROTECT R26 "NO PARKING" SIGNS AND TRAFFIC SIGNING AND SIGNAGE, EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING ROLLING PASTURE PL. CURB & GUTTER AS REQUIRED. 5, SIDEWALK 7, LANDSCAPING CURB & GUT lEBR 18, EXISTING E. PROVIDE ONE (1) 5800 LUMEN HPSV STREET LIGHTS PER CITY STANDARDS. LANDSCAPING F. PROTECT MODIFY OR RELOCATE EXIST. TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED. EXIST G. CONSTRUCT PAVEMENT TRANSITION PER CITY STD . 406 NORTH OF NORTH PROPERTY 5' bike, lane. =111,;1111=III=III=III III=III=III=III=III=III=III=III III=III=III=III=III=III RESIDENCE 1=1 11=1 11=1 I Ili=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 I I-1 1=1 11=1 I 1-11 11 I 1=1 11=1 11=1�' RESIDENCE �V LINE. RELOCATE AVE -' 1-1 I=I 1-11 I=1 11=11 I=1 11=1 I I-I 11-III-1 11-III-I 11-11 =1 11 —_ __ _ _ =1 11=III=III=1 1 III=III=III=I 1 -__- 1=1 1=1 11-I 1-1 1(- EXIST. POWER POLE TO ACCOMMODATE AND REPAIR ANY DAMAGE TO EXIST. DRIVEWAY. �• I "-�I I=1I I-I1=1I I=�i i - - - 1=1I I-III-III-III I 1=1 I1=1I 1=1I I-III-III-III-III-III-III-I I1-1 I1=1I 1=1 I1=1I 1=1 I1=1I 1=1 I-I 1-1 I1=1I-1' Q i - I 5. "A" STREET TO BE IMPROVED PER A MODIFIED VERSION OF STANDARD DRAWING 113, ROLLING PASTURE PIL I I� TO THE SATISFJ3CTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER, INCLUDING THE FOLLOWING: s•-1o. 4- a' as' a• a' s'->lo� I F aa' LANoscAF . SECTION F-F I.IJ r A. PROVIDE CURB AND GUTTER, 6-FOOT WIDE CURB ADJA.ENT SIDEWALK, STREET TREES, EASEMEF - NTS = N a DRIVE APPROACHES AND ACCESS RAMPS ON BOTH SIDES OF BASE LINE ROAD O Q Lj INTERSECTION. A NON-STANDARD RAMP DESIGN MAY BE REQUIRED ON THE EAST SIDE, EAST AVENUE RW PROPOSED EXISTING WITHIN EXIST. RIGHTS-OF-WAY OFF SITE. CURB & GUTTER EXISTING CURB & GUTTER O B. INSTALL COBBLESTONES IN 5-FOOT EAST PARKWAY PER STANDARD DRAWING 542, CASE ��G� ��z$ PROPOSED 44.0' EAST AVE. 44.0' EXISTING W r 1 /NFIL TRA TION 4.0' 8.0' 32.0' 14.7' EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD m r IL TRENCH SIDEWALK m C. PROVIDE TWO (2) 5800 LUMENS HPSV STREET LIGHTS. _ _ _ _ _ _ �jj Z D. PROVIDE TRAFFIC SIGNING AND STRIPING AS REQUIRED. 88' = 1 =III=III 1=II I=III=III=III _j w 0 E. DRIVEWAY FOR HOUSE TYPE "2" SHALL BE DESIGNED AS FAR NORTH AS POSSIBLE. 64' - III III-III-I - - III=Illi ,11'- n / /� / T Q Q Y -_ - -II-III-III-III-ITI-III=IT1- B�/ V A/ V S / U a _ 12' s2' s2' 12' '-1 1 11=1 11=1 1 11=1 11=1 I I- -I 11=1 I=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I - - - = I-1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I=_= 11=1 11=1 I I-1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I_,,III- ' � cn 0 � U 6. A SIGNED CONSENT AND WAIVER FORM TO JOIN ANDLOR FORM THE APPROPRIATE 5' 11' 11' 10 11' 11' S III 1111 it l 11 i 11 l 11 11 l - Imo, III„ I�SStI l l-1 - _ _ II I I� �l l l� �l l 11 l l l_„III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III-III;III I I I I I i,l l l l l l i,l l l 1I I=III=III=III=III=III=I I� 1111_,,1 I- LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE ENGINEERING Bike � i L '� f f Bike SIDEWALK SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL OR ISSUANCE OF BUILDING EAST AVE . N Secondary Arterial (Class II Bike Lane) SECTION E-E r- PERMITS WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST. FORMATION COSTS SHALL BE BORNE BY THE Li DEVELOPER. NTS C 7. PARKWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE GRADED AT 2% 40' 0 40' 80' 120' 1_ LL 0 CD W 0 Z r 8. ALL EXISTING WALLS WILL RECEIVE A STOCCO FINISH. NEW WALLS WILL NEED TOSCALE: 1" - 4O' = LLI J HAVE A MATCHING STOCCO FINISH - (n EL ' vL I u u �� I a1�'/1 i ANN i 1�NV/y4viN a '1/ i � � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII J , i ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ i i i i i i A COMMUNITY TRAIL IS AVI R RE IMPROVEMENTS / \ _ ,/'���----- 1630 ----�' I��J ) E- J -------------------------- / _- / / / , / ' ' 1617.5 Lu --- --------------------------J �tISTI G , 16 ��� o / LIGHT P LE /' _ _____- -/-,----------- PROEOS6�----------- ,� w -_____ 1625 ,,-''/ - --- _ - _ - _ - c Q - - - - o ---- - '' _ - ------ - PROPOSED 6' 87FS ' \NEER C) exZ p - --- ----_- - ------------- ___ - - _ _ - - _ - _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ` o - - - - - - - - - %= - / S�I�EEN IAA /r =Q oe° icy - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -, -'- - - _ - _ - _ - - - - - - J _ - - - /- ' - - - - - 161 .�5�G - - - - - - �G14.o0IC-,-f-- - - - - /r � � o - - - - - - - - -x'6275 F�- - -I- == - - SC_REEIV�1Ni41J�=' _- _ - _ - _ -rr - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ - - _ - - _ >_ - _ - - _ - _ - _ - - - � J- - _ - _ - _ - - - - '� - - 8- - �= - - - - - - - - - - - � �- _ _ - �- _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - - - - __- - _ - rt6�0�OfiVI� = � O� _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - - - - _ - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - _ - - _ - - - - -__ - - _ - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - -- --_ -_- --- - - - - - - - _---__- --__ - - - - \� ---------------- - - - - r _ _ 1614�SF� b`1�3.55S m LL W iffi .I . / 1 - s 1622 OOTC 30 C �-LL 1619 30TC 617.80 C 0 - - --- njot- 162 .25TC- 1622.0 F 1621 50FS _-- 16 1.00TC -__ - 1 18.80 S --- 2 1618 80FS 1617.5 io, �' 617.30 S/' 14. 0 S .75FS L - --- --- _ - 621. OT 16 0.50 ----- �p� ' W ` �' ,� o '\6 �� - -�- --- --- --» --- - _-/ 1 O '' 1J" STE UT /' / • ' °12 STEP 12 STEP TE ,'S PCU B ' - ---- ---C - - - ---- -- --- --- - - --- ----- ---- - ---- ----- - - - -- -- - - - - -- » - ---- < » - _ TECO O ,�. . . . . 12 STEP 0 3.59° --'' 4 �`°` RB 12 UL 92 ITER T C RB CURB -_- �:_- 1619' ____--- 1618 ~ �'' �O ,, PT1C KS DESIGN RI �Y INE 0 ' O /. 0�� //// / 20 _____- --- FIRE ACCESS - \ -- /' >_ 1 ,-'' 10 ___-____ - PATH TYP. 1617 //' ��'� 615.65TC ' G / ' O , & SEEP GE PP71`FOR- SIG T PER %\\ �/ 1�23.25TC 1622.75FS 1619.60TC _ 1613:9oTC z `L / - '' '' �' �� 1615.15E � 1614.90TC '' REFER CE ONLY. CI STD GENERA 12" STEP OUT 10 1619_1QF�--- 1617.30FS A DESIG & FOOTPRI --- -- - / 1616.1 OFS 1614.40F 'O \ '' '' o CON EPT FIGURE EXISTING . , CURB / / � '' �' -' 2 STEP OU � /1'613.40FS �`-- \ /` _---- 1617.61 FS 12 STEP OUT - 1616.10FS O OF TIG-DANK / f / EQUESTRIAN TR I i 2 STEP OUT 1616.50FS _-.---___.______...-__- \ . . , - -- -- CU#�B ---- -- -- -- ----- ---- -- --- -- ------------- -_CUR - - -- -- ----- - ---- -- - --- --- ---- - �� /i� ��. OOT ---- / r B ` �� �� : ` 16' :3QT 12 TEP T/ 1 TEP y `� A 'W,6 .4.85 ` CUR SEP RATE PERMIT \. / CUB LLQ. . . . �� � 8 » °O " CUR %� �' / 161 TC 14: - �6 U / 1 19.85 16 2 6 16 8. 2TC --- 1617.2 TC 0 C i LL' _ >� T8.36 C - - �/ /1613 50FS / 1619.50TC 16,9:30T ` - 5.3 16 7. 2FS 1616.7 FS 1616 16 5.45E _ _ ° �, Z Z C� 12" STEP OUT 617.86 161 D0� - Z ;. . LL • , .76w18:80FS4� _ � w 610.83FS �'� � v� � CURB ___-- 1614.15FS i 1 11 FS J i 7 ' • ". /' - --- ------ `�`� y x615.54Fs /' ' _- � - :PROPOSE{- r_ _ / _ 615.40PS 1612.31E =� ` Q_ 1618.65` - - w E-+ . AIN 1N1 rn - EXI TIN 12 STEP OUT - G - :i°. - 0-4_ .��� �: -- _ 'i.' 1 t3.35FS Z N � CURB_- _ _ _ - ••�� /. . -��.-. � �/ •:� -,, w � lJVER M••� U W M �3 ,�� 1611.00 v_� rY TILITY FO /' Z Z z z _ z ST. IGH �(ISTING W W w poo � /' 16 .8000 ----- -------- -+ � Z " 1616.0-1 === LIGHT POLE BUILDING RETAINING /� 512 40TC 160.50 �-��- I W Z f� 1615.33PAD / ' 1611.90FL ° : : a N Z a 1618.7 5FF � v 18 08PAD �,/ - w / 16 `�--------------------------- 0_) v BUILDING RETAINING 3.5' MAX 6 0 �, ,�' �/' '' ° LL " Q - /� W 618.75FS � . . > � BUILDING DEEP FOOTING 4' . . . . . .•.•<-` 1 r 4 O w --- 1 / _ 2 / // � .. 88.00' 17.00 1 /' _ ,L / 2.00 v '. .•.4.00.• � EE OTE 1 �� 12" STEP OUT 11 J' - %' ,� /' i ° E)IS G I TOFWAY - 0 y - i LLI:LL:.. .SIDEWAL 1 CURB BUILDING DEEP FOOTING 1 .8' MAX. // „� _ 0 CL OF T EET. _ - � =�=�=: 6 :� : :oQ_ -3iaaa'•� 8.00' .o ' W J / .161.5.955 011A1 : /' 1 1 16�1.2.95•FS•` 12" STEP OUT /' - 161540 ` ZO9.65TW CURB ; - 12 STEP OUT 0 _ 1615.50TC - 1606.8W 1 .�� '\ � -161.2:5Q 615:hSFE•. .� •r� :�- / - T / / •/ SENOTE2 CURB 9 / ' i 0 506 \ I. 1614.00TC •` . � � � Q, 16 0.30 1611.25. �Q�, �.•:•:•:•:•:•. v •:1608:OiD•C . `� �' 607.6 FS 1 .20TC • �.•.`--.--,•.•.•.�� �� ,r 1 _ 1613.50FS _ TEP 0 T 1606.70FL ,• 1615. 5TC/� 2" STEP OUT - - /''' E 0 T CU 1� -�,. PRO SE 2 - " 609 80E ' - 9 ° Z . . . : . 1615. SFAS -- ----- ---- ---- ;---- ----- 16 9.55 C S RIG 29' / 12 STEP OUT 1 07.55T H )FWAY --- �� ,0 _ 1612.0©TFLL : : : : LLLL : . . . LL - OS 'f'�9 - CUR -- �� 10.00T --16--- ------------- --- 7-_II5F ---- . . .CST�C � N1=1LTkA�ION. --- -- - / ------------- ---- - -- ---- - - ----- - ----- -- ----- -- - 1612.50FS 1 09.5 1` o� _ - / L J . . . . . . . . . �, '� �l 1609.67TC / 0-1 7 �� -- -- -1615.07TG 1tk _ 1 S 1612.80TC .Tf�ENCFI': o C Y ' f/ / -- \0 ''� - ' DUC D RADIUS - - - - 1609.50 ° ° ° ° -------- - - / -- ---- 602. 6 S , J 1614.57FS - -- -- -- - - -- / - ----- - -- - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- - --_ -- - -- - -- _ - - ' ' ° ° �` :1:603.-50 -'� -/ a Q SITY STD NO.113 06.00TC ' Z 1� \ ,_ 161 1 /'' ROPOSED ° ° 160,5f OF �'LL . . , E CURBSIDE :1 161 ) 1 - 1 -- �-f-- /'� 1604:OOF °i PROPOSED ��' ��. A - ,-��� ' DRAIN T r , DR 0 ET Q " P �UT �16�3. 0 C 1� - 1612.00TC 1611.50TC ,' , �/ ° ° ° ° ° ° ° - -- -- �---- / / DRAIN INLET ( -� -- - - -_ .75T _ OPO _ -A o rn ----------------------------------------- - L .�. r' Lr --' -�' 1611.50FL 1611.00FL _, , -- _ r - C I _ , ' P TD 0 Z LL 1614.06 TG v I --- _____- ------- - - ;�= : : : 1 / � ' - - AIN LLINLE z 1 � p. �.' .ter .� 1' U w 0 •:r 1` - - 01.06 S _ y w 1 15.78FS _ - ir�i '" ��` -- EQ rice - i i PROPOSED DRAIN INLET 6 1. 4FS _ - Q z J ` � ,; N w Q \ / i P1OPOS D RIG \ IVE APPROACH & SIDEWALK \ -- -- / i r DRAIN INLET -_------ ----_- » " UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION \ 1603.60TG , �R - - + Z Q Q / r I ` DRAIN INLET / I / ATION- R CITY STD PLAN N01 E C \ SLUMP STONE r 1610.05TG i / �� \ SLUMP TONE l , c3 ' SCREEN WALL // �r i \\ 1611 , i 11 i ' j ; ; SCREEN WALL J N 2 w o I --- _-- _--, . 1607.55 CV Q � 2 1614.o0TF ' ' I r: I _ i ___-_ - - _ _ , - -- -- -- ---- _ I .0 j _ _ _ _ _ _ - 1600 0 Q U EXISTING _-� ------ - PROPOSED'TAEWAY ___--- -- v 1606.41FS - ----EXISTING -�- NOTE: ANY MODIFICATION TO i = EQUESTRIAN TRAIL THE EXISTING TRAIL CONNECTION EQUESTRIAN TRAIL--� 1 - I Q WILL REQUIRE APPROVED BY Q THE TRAILS COMMITTEE. W Z LEGEND: V Q EXISTING j � � SIDEWALK NOTE: 1. ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY WILL WILL BE DEDICATED i �' EXISTING FLOW DIRECTION O ALONG EAST AVE.EAST AVE SHALL BE IMPROVED FULL WIDTH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY a ADA PATH OF TRAVEL U ' "SECONDARY ARTERIAL" (88' RIGHT OF WAY) STD & /ST EXIST FIGURE 5-28 OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, PARKING LOT LIGHTING (LIGHT POLE) ' BETWEEN THE SOUTH PROJECT BOUNDARY TO O� (18. 0') (18.00') RESIDENCE WILSON AVE. THE IMPROVEMENT SHALL INCLUDE CURB, GUTTER, A.C. PAVEMENT, STREET LIGHT, FIRE ACCESS PATH (26' WIDE) ELElM1TI0N I ACCESS RAMPS, SIDEWALK, STREET TREES, TRAFFIC SIGN AND STRIPING. EXIST 2. COMMUNITY ENTRY TREE PLANTINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE 5-12 RESIDENCE AND EAST AVE ATHEMENDA PWALLCONL FIGURE 5 FIGURE28 AND W O ? ~ I I I I 5.28-A. SEE DETAIL HEREON AND SHEET 1 I N Q ❑ � Q ' O O ' O W i a PLAN VIE TER W! yy AND I m co I LLI z m Q � Q j 0 Q 0 _ cn 0 0 0 EAST AVENUE PARKWAY i FIG 5-28A F I F I N i N to O ill EXIST O L------------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------- ------- -------------------------- I RESIDENCE LL Oto i ~ O Z � REVISED 9/7IBB I i 20' 0 20' 40' 60' W o L1J L1J J ENCS SCALE: I" = 20' c/) LL 6E0 I I I I D i I I I I II IIIIi ' I I I I li a IIIIi a I ( I I I I V I I I I I I I II a I I I I I I d � IIIIII — -- — ------ I I D a ( I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I . IIIIII I I I I I I I I I I 1 '' 1 ' 111111; III ISI — I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ; I ; I ; I ;! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I IIID I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111111 ;; I I I I I I I I I I IIr IF I I I I I I I 1111I I " 11 II " II 11 11 1 1 1 1 11L'L LU-111 11 I I I I I 1 y111 ' 111 ' ll 1� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111111111 +1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111111111 II I 1 1 1 1 1 - - - _ _ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( IIIIIIIII I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( IIIIII III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ( I I IIII III I I 1111 + +co + + + + + + + + 1111111 + + + + + + + + + + + + I I I I I 11111; 1 + + + + + + + + + + + IIIIIIII; + + + + + + + + + + + + + I I I 1 1111111; + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + IIII ; + + + + + + + + + + + I I ( IIII; + + + + + + + + + + + + I I 1 i111I111I1I + + + + + + + + + + + + I 1 ,1 1 1 1 1i + + + + + + + + + + + + I I I 111111111111 o + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I I 11111 ' 111 ' 111 + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 I I I 1 IIIIIIII � _ � ,IIIIII it 1 1 1 1 ; 1 I I I 1 � 11 III 11 I I I I I 1 I I I D + + + + + + + + + + + I �01 + + + + + + + + + I I I 1 n I II + + + + + + + + + + + + II III III; 7 + + + + + + + + + + + + + I I I I 1 II I IIIIII I Z + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I I I 1 I I 1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + I I I 1 1 III III O + + + + + + + + + + + I I I I I I 11 I I I + + + + + I I I I 1 II III 11P + + + + + + + + + I1111i C Z ji. + + + + + + I I I I I I I Ij ( I I I I I I II n 1 + + + + + I I I V I N + + + + + + + N III; + + + + + + + + + 1 1 11 cr 1 1 1 1i � ® 1 + + + + + + + + I I 1 ( IIII O 1 i + + + + + II IIII1 D o o + + + + + + + I I I I ►' ' 1111111] l � ' + + + + + + I I I III; 1111111 r= o I + + + + + + + + + I I ®I I I I 1II o mr + + + + + + + + I I I d 1111111 1 + + + + + + + + + + + STOP I 1 � I I I I I IIII , + + + + + + + + 1 go I I I I 11 + + + + + + + + + I I I I 1111111 '' , — II II I + + + + + + + 1111111 + + + + + + + + + + I I I I I IIII 1 + + + + + + + + + + + I I ® I I I I „ 1111 I 1 + + + + + + + + + o l + + + + + + + + + + + 1 1 1 1 IIL I 11 1111 1 + + + + + + + + + + 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1111111 II + + + + + + + + + I I 1 1 + + + + + + + I I 1111111 I + + + + + + + + + + 1 1 1 1 11 1 I I II I 1 � 1 1 1 1 � ,II ' 111 1111 + + + + + + + + 1 1 1 + + + + + + + + + + + 1 1 1 1 I 11111111 + + + + + + + + I 1 1 I 1 u 1 1 1 II I II III 1111 n 1 + + + + + + + + + + 1 1 I 1 X11 ± I III 11 4-- + + + + + + + + + I 1 I I I I II IIIIIIIIIII + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 1 it i III III + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + i1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 + + + + + + + I 1 1 1 1 PI I I I II 1 + + + + + + + + 1 4� 1 1 1 I IIIIIIIIIIII + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + I 11 I I II 0 11111; + + + + I 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 + + + + IIII, + + I + 1 + 1 1 1 111 ' 1111 + + 11111 111 + + 1111111111 r I + + + + + + + + + + + 1 1 1 I I 1111 + + 1111111111 m I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I c) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + VIII I 1 I 11 III1� + + 1111111111 z 1 1 I I + + lilililili o I LI + + + + + + + + + + 1111111111 I + + + + 1 1 1 1 I 1 111 u1111111 ' I I I I I II n I � IIIIIIIII + � II IIIIII + + + + + - + + + + 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 11111111111 o- AAA' + + + 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 111111111111 ,- I I ( IIII C17 �7Z7 � Cr O ❑ o ❑ 0 — — m O r — II o --_--- __-- _ — w 00 C Z7 J i O 70 m 00 1 CD cu D D " " 32 33 � m - N W EAST AVE � � W ------------ --------- — ----- cn N TI I I I I \ \ I I SHEET 3 SCALE: PER SHEET PLUMP ENGINEERING INC. ���QQQ�TR1�/ � REVISIONS CUT & FILL EXHIBIT CONSULTING ENGINEERS IN CIVIL, 0 0 2� OF 6 DATE: 10/09/2019 APN: 0225-112-05-0-00 SURVEYING, ARCHITECTURAL ANDw NO.65859 0 m RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING c ~ EXP.12/31/19 FILE N O. DRAWN BY: AA/JT ANAHEIM,M914 E. T,CALIFORNIA 92805 sgTF OF ICA1-����\P 1609029 5734 EAST AVENUE n 10-09-2019 CHKD. BY: TT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739 0 PLUMP ENGINEERING INC. (714)385-1835, FAX(714)385-1834 TRYFON TRYFONOPOULOS DATE S CTIONS LAN APN : 0225- 112-05-0-00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA EXIST PROP. EXIST EXIST. LANDSCAPE 6' SCREEN WALL GROUND EXIST LANDSCAPE 123.00' 9.50' 182.68' 69.49' 20.94' 125.01 ' 7.00' PROP. R W 44.00' 44.00' PL 1619.44TC 1617.63TC PROP. PROP. PROP. EXIST EXIST. 26.00' 30.33' 4' 8' CUT LANDSCAPE 6 STAIRS 1616.75FS PROP. STREET 1618.94FS 1.4 0 1617.13FS CUT 1614.50FS 6" STAIRS LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE 1609.50TC 2' --- - --------------------------------- °----- --- .1618.75FF _ . . _ _. 1618.75FF,. .... 1618.75FF =1618.75FS 24% C.L. ------------------------- 3 LANDSCAPE FS --- - ------------ PROP. - - ---- 3.24a--------- --- .OFF 1616.00FF - _ � _� ,. .,. .. ...... ::.. ..: _ .......... . .. ..... . ... ._.-. ._ ._.. ... .. . _ ... ... _. .. 609 0 PROP. PROP. - PROP. PROP. 4.�.. % 16091.98TC 0 6 SCREEN WALL PROP. PROP. - CURB mile I BUILDING DEEP FOOTING - PROP. PROP. _ � -__ I CURB &GUTTER I PROP. _ ¢� BUILDIN 1 4 F - LANDSCAPE (2:1 MAX) I AC PAVEMENT I PROP. (3.5' MAX) - G LANDFILL SIDEWALK SIDEWALK - SIDEWALK - I PROP. BULIDING $ S CURB &GUTTER - CURB - I I I I I LANDFILL DEEP FOOTING PROP• PROP. - (4MAX) - LANDSCAPE - CURB & GUTTER - LANDSCAPE - - SIDEWALK ' PROP. RETAINING WALL �- 1 1 I -III . li I I I W SECTION A -A o_ SCALE: 1" = 20' (HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL) 07 Lu PROP. 61 .0' 7.5' 6.6' 73.0' 12.6' 43.0' 6' HEIGHT SCREEN WALL PL BUILDING RETAINING PL 1621 .25TC o w 1620.75FS EXIST. (2' MAX) M Q C:) 0 PROP. EXIST. o _CURB GROUND EXIST. EXIST. ---- CUT GROUND 1618.23TC PROP. 1617.73FS CURB PROPOSED BUILDING GROUND PROP. G� N R LANDSCAPE -x:95%---- ------------- ------------------ ,. N -' -------------- 1618.75FF 1618.75FF ; 2, ROP 6' HEIGHT SCREEN WALL P� p��os, bi,G T- -- 97� P 1615.05TC f URB O�p co M J J t 1� I 1� /1 1L//,��/��/�\/�\�/�/;�//�\//\\//\\//\\// //\\//\\//\\//\\ \//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\ //\\ 1614.55FS 1613.00TC LL N_ _> PROP. r 4 4� /\//\//\//\//\//\//\//\// //\// I I ! ! I f I rt 111 1 `1���\/�\/\/\/\/ \/\/\/\ 4.77% 1612.50FL O " o I PAVEMENT - PROP. � � �- I � fi � SID PROP. PROP. PROP. PROP. LANDSCAPE PROP. I I ANDSCAPE - LANDFILL - I I I LANDSCAPE 2:1 MAX) PRI I I - 5 I I I I I LANDFILL - PRO LANDFILL - PROP. _ AC PAVEMENT_ - CURB & GUTTER I I I I I EXIST. LANDFILL I OP.LANDFILL I I I I I I O GROUND PROP. I I LANDFILL p -I IL O PROP. O LANDSCAPE z O SECTION 6 - 6 z � Q SCALE: 1" = 10' (HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL) � Ua zPL 62.1 ' 9.0' 31 .4' 6.1 ' 47.3' 6.1 ' 26.9' 4.2' 5.0' � Z PROP. w W U W 6' HEIGHT SCREEN WALL PL W W W Z M 00 P - M�I W °0° I r� 1618.83TC EXIST. V W � W z Z GROUND CUT 1615.96FS 1 16.03FS GB ROP. 1615. 2TW I Z Q; a > �4 1618.33FS PROP. EXIST. 1614.22FS V O EXIST ______ _ ___3_82% SIDEWALK ANDSCAPE GROUND PROP, PRO I w Z Z a w LANDSCAPE - ------------ -- 0.83% 2.140 EW K LA CAPE -------------- PROP. -- ----- 2.14% EXIST W ¢ ^ SIDEWALK N S [� U M _ ...... .. .. y 1611 .50TC PROP. PA VEMENT w U w CURB = _ T ,\ \4' <11�/L/,/iL/G 1� // // // / / /\/\/\/\/\/ /\/\ ! \ \ ! 2° 1611 .30FS 1608.30LIP _ PROP. ! -! ! T` ���L��\y� \ �\\1\1\�\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\ GATE ,� x �n PROP. PROP, l�\ \�\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ° Z > W AC PAVEMENT 0" CURB SIDEWALK I I `� '1�'/�, �/ 6.1% ° PROP. - I PROP. 1 90 % 0 Z LANDSCAPE (2:1 MAX) - LANDFILL -_ - EXIST - RETAINING WALL PROP• I I I I I I I I :- _GROUND - CURB PROP. - PROP. PROP. -I AC PAVEMENT - SIDEWALK DRIVEWAY III _ LANDFILL I ��, II ' II III - W -III III II III III III � SECTION C - C SCALE: 1" = 10' (HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL) 5.5' 61 .0' 8.1 ' 13.1 ' 57.9' 21 .6' 43.0' Q Z M PROP. P L O ti Q 6' HEIGHT SCREEN WALL 1615.06FS O J rn PROP. PROP. PL I� U w 0 1615.63TC 1614.96TC BUILDING PROP. Z O Q Z -i 1615.13FS EXIST. 1614.46FS LANDSCAPE PROPOSED BUILDING GROUND 6,4% LANDSCAPE 1 .10% 1 .31% r 11616..1 OOFF 1616.00FF 1616.00FF':....::..:.:.•::,,:;-:.,:::.. . ....., 6 HEIGHT SCREEN WALL ... .... ....:...... . ....:....:.::....:.::.:.........:..:....::. :.,.;:;:.:.,..:.,,... :.:..:.....- .. PROP. N C� > U 3y, LANDSCAPE Z Q //\///\///\///\// / / //\// //\// //\///\///\///\///\///\///\///\///\///\///\//// / ///////////\///\//////\///\////// �3$ 1609.38TC I O U) cD �PRLP - PROP. 1p��\ �\,�\ \ \�\\ \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \ EXIST Q z _ PROP. I\ 1 � \/\ 1608.88FS GROUND 1607.49TC I N w O - CURB AC PAVEMENT _ CURB CURB - �i\,\ \ \ \\ \\j\\j\\ !j/\\/\\//\\//\\//\//\//\// /\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\ 4.40% 1606.99FS N Q PROP. I I I I I I I I I I EXIST I I !� �° W c U v I I I \/moi � Lo D \!\/\ \ \ \ ZU U LANDSCAPE (2:1 MAX) EXIST - _GROUND PROP. - EXIST I I I - � / �// // /////�\/ /� � �"\// / %\ \ PROP, r�r ���l���\i\� ,/\\j\ \ \ \ GROUND - I LANDFILL = GROUND- PROP, CURB _ PROP. PROP._ �\ O LANDFILL - EXIST. _ DOST. AC PAVEMENT - CURB GROUND_ -GROUND I PROP. PROP. LANDFILL - SCREEN WALL I I I I I I Z - I I I I III I I Q III I _ III III III III III III � REMOVABLE WELL SECTION D - D OVERFLOW CAP N CURB 4-6 INCH PERFORATED SCALE: 1" = 10' (HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL) 6" RETAINING DIAMETER PVC WATER BASIN r17 pX v/i`, vv/vv/v/ /vv/vv/vv/vv/vv/vv/vv/vv/vv/vv/vv/� LLLLLLLLLm VJ, (N) CONC. �� �\��\i������ :%�� �� \\/\ 3" MULCH AS H PRE-TREATMENT PRIOR Lu r jo o �� TO INFILTRATION = N GEOTEXTILE i/\ �4�) \\j�� 12" SOIL FOR co a FILTER FABRICj\ o o o o LANDSCAPE PLANTING \// W r \ z 00 cz o O j\// W 60 DEEP TRENCH _j Ijj 3 p // FILLED WITH 1 .5-2.5 INCH U Q _ DIAMETER CLEAN STONE U) p p U i\r, \\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\\i\ \\i; SQUARE STEEL 6" SAND FILTER IDTH PER PLAN FOOT PLATE WITH REBAR ANCHOR . 0 LL O t4 LLJ 0 Z r Lo NTS INFILTRATION TRENCH 3 LL] J (n LL CEO i * IF L I — t r m 1 • �. Z 6 r 0 . _ F 7 SON I•Fr �1 0 r 190 ml NO _ J■ ' - 'ILI , 9m m L 1 7 r i . J � � r i - t lm� 1 . 1� T - .0 -6 111 f T r ■ ip ■ i .am 4 ■ it r1i ■ 'ti ] 1 :Eq 9 j � • (b 9or . , 1 – r`I 12. , I� ` 1` 1-1, �, O 1 `I•r r, - ' IN M � r1 ML a IN D - i am x IN ' J• Z 6 J 17111- mill } HORSE THIEF PL rv6ft Cb dim� ,; r 4. I I$ �# -�i pLd SZ) 7 IF • - IF w L r-I 6 -* P IL ISI, f i Ir - JL 1� r a� k-4 or P bF jt F ` .y - IN IN Lw 16. 11 JL 7 K III d I As -0 1, F IM i • 1 rL LIN . j ! iINEW Limil — – - , r3 � 1 y 1 J, IN ' - 7• tp, r I - - 1 11 _ a 1_ = a 4A_71111110 i , ,� 1 Ir I r " %I *it 4 ' • - - - ---90L- ■ 1 � ININ dF ,I ;r r ti-Ir - millr �Nmr p DX - _ C13 C) 11 limp L J 111 Z ..! L 1 , A961I ■f• IF r Zia Cb Pr y dim. IN fT JrL ALJ � 1 .16, JI 1 J J 7 1 L - rL ML ■ r L J Ilk Z Nj wi L :Z� 4� -rA NO NO 0 ININ J. a•1 �� rMull .� 0 # NEM L 600 FT i 0 600 FT 7 — I (b c: . . I _ +• am do911 m L r ^ O M .. � yr, ISI. i - IN �•• N %Z .?96 1, mi Ar. SON IN ION Na > z Okim; Mir ROLLING PASTURE PL ■ _ ,�� . ; 1�� rim, �1i WIN r X IN 0 x Z 1 � C-) N L. r L IL PL MI IN >Dqr IN G) r / 111 t M6 If AV 111 111 6 -imp IN wr AL V r 106 I� 26 E: C) 111 AF -F • - 11sill i L� 1 - . ` 0 NO -r I -NO - 0 b. Z 1 �1 J �T7 - C 11 m 9F IN M , ■ - D 'i■ EAST AVENUE n m ■ x - mill 1 z I. ■_ L Zrr I\ Lip I r I. i 7 LIN Q) J , 1! 9:r AL 1 • r 1 ` ' � - A %0 ' Cb 1 ' No Ni 1 am. IN �M !tw. 1 IIIIN d " IN I J• .�� I L ti ti i J . 1 r , L Ir, 4 * 9f 11 ti iiiIII 1 -JL IL - I I X11 'l Q) _ IN Mdl NMI IES 1 pcy) AV Ill r 0 1 1 06 L' r 1110 1 1J IN r ■ F Y !?' , or 11% i ' � 1 LLi 1 _ ; r �' p f IN '11 'I .�F � r WIN Nj Nm I Cb I dr . MIK Eli I.0 % MI id a 1P kill L A. I III-loop `1 - W,%I 10 116 Ir I IN 1 .�1 1 L k4 k..4 ■ ■ NO ♦i i # 61�• 0 LIN I.� ' _ _ , � _ ' IN I061 �fjs a id.- _ 1a ■ - 1 �J ' � 1■ � r I � � - � � ��1 I J; 'a ]'T'r x.111 all Nor _ 0 LT� 1 r C) M z P r D C) 0 SHEET 5 SCALE: PER SHEET SITE UTILIZATION MAP PLUMP ENGINEERING INC. t`OeROTESS/0, � REVISIONS � CONSULTING ENGINEERS IN CIVIL, OF 6 DATE: 10/09/2019 APN: 0225-112-05-0-00 SURVEYING, ARCHITECTURAL AND w NO.65859 0o m RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING ~ EXP.12/31/19 FILE NO. DRAWN BY: AA/JT 914 E.KATELLAAVENUEsq�FOFIVI\. 1609029 5734 EAST AVENUE ANAHEIM,CALIFORNIA 92805 10-09-2019 CHKD. BY: TT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91739 PLUMP ENGINEERING INC. (714)385-1835, FAX(714)385-1834 TRYFON TRYFONOPOULOS DATE PR LIMINARY WAT R UALITY MANAG M NT LAN APN : 0225- 112-05-0-00 RANCH0___CUCAM0NGA, CALIFO-RNIA ... - "---------�, � ��- __--� ---' _----------- ---- � ,,--- - _____ I vim- ______--- ,�- ,,- --' -� ------ ___---- ,,- - ----- '11 ', \\, - ______ __�_ ` �' '/ 1 ' \ - 1625 --- ------ --' ------------ ---------- QµµOTE - _ ' _ 1 ___-' ,_� " __--- ,--' -------- ,/ a �/ o ' I MO- / -' - / I --' ------------ ---_ -_-- ' y. . Wil•.'.'.'.-.' ' /' i111:,7-77*.*,*.*.*.*.*,*.'.'."""'.""""", _ _ , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CIOMV . . ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` ` '` ` ` `'`•` ` ` ` � '' C) - '-- --- --- -. .' /' REPLACEMENT AND DISPOSAL OF EXPOSED FILTER MEDIUM AND COLLECTED .•.rte. . . . . - - =z. .'. . . . .'- /, - REPLACE _ _ - i' 10 : : : :' ,/ DEBRIS : . r. . . . . . . - 162 -- -- 10 : - /- -:- • 4:.:.•• g '*• - --- - - ,,, ,' - - . . - The frequency of filter medium pouch exchange will be in accordance with the existing DPS-Customer : : . r. . . . . . _ : . . . . . . .'. . . ---- .,. . . . . - . . . ✓- . : _ -- _ _ - , ' _- --_ - GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR MAINTENANCE OF Maintenance Contract. DPS recommends that the medium be changed at least once per year. During the • _ __ - ,,-' ,/' �� /' I� ,' ��� ,/' ,/ PLO-GARD+PLUS®CATCHBASININSERTFILTERS ap ropriate service, or if so determined by fire service technician during anon-scheduled service, the filter �'' `o` /' - SCOPE: medium pouches will be replaced with new pouches. Once the exposed pouches and debris have been 'i ,-- --- DA 161 -- ___-------- 161 '' �/ ,,L / ' ,/ \� / ' __--'-' \` /'� ,/ ,�''162 _-'' 162 ------ ,' 1617 ,� ° -' ---- ,// removed, DPS has possession and must dispose of it in accordance with local, state and federal agency - _--- _ _�' Federal, State and Local Clean Water Act regulations and those of insurance carriers require that �' 132,99 _ - ,' requirements. �/ 162 ,- ,' ,' ,' stormwater filtration systems be maintained and serviced on a recurring basis. The intent of the _-__---- 053 AC _ __-- -�'' 11 ,��'/ �''' �o_�_ �' /' regulations is to ensure that the systems, on a continuing basis, efficiently remove pollutants from DPS also has the capability of servicing all manner of catch basin inserts and catch basins ' ,' _----- _------ 7T_.. -__......_ . . . . . . . . . . . . : ,/ ,' :, ,.' stormwater runoff thereby preventing pollution of the nation's water resources.These specifications apply without inserts,underground oil/water separators,stormwater interceptors and other such devices. _ - 9, _ = - �'• _ _�� to the F1oGazd+Plus®Catch Basin Insert Filter. . - - - • • - - - • • - • • - - y.,,: y, • _ ,� DPS personnel are highly qualified technicians and are confined space trained and certified. , IOf All \ `� i' _ 1620 _ _� i' `� '� /6/0_ '/ RECOMMENDED FREQUENCY OF SERVICE: Call us at(888)950-8826 for further information and assistance. . . . . . . . . . . . --- / �I Q _ =. , " . . . . . ' / _ ,' Drainage Protection Systems (DPS) recommends that installed Flo-Gard+Plus Catch Basin Insert r''� ,/' / ' /''�// \\\ ,Z Filters Filters be serviced on a recurring basis. Ultimately, the frequency depends on the amount of runoff, �rr� �! 'f'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' » /' pollutant loading and interference from debris (leaves, vegetation, cans, paper, etc.); however, it is •.•.-. _-- - P g g P P : : �. . . . .'. . . . .'.:. . . . . . . . . . L , - y- - - • - - - - • - - /' recommended hinstallation ri minim hr r h h ffil r that each be se v ced a um oft ee times a ear,with a change e o to 16 '.�.....,1,'.'.'. . . P Y g / : ./. . : : . . . . . .'. . . .'./- . . . . . . . . . WI FOS L �R�€R. ' --- - -'- "• - - • - - - • - - - - - - 7 medium once per year.DPS technicians are available to do an on-site evaluation,upon request. I P Y P q --J /' 161 /� - - ` ` ` `-`-` ,� - /'' RECOMMENDED TIMING OF SERVICE: r 1B - - .'� - i DPS guidelines for the timingof service are as follows: z / _ _ - - :: ::::::: `� ,/ 1. For areas with a definite rainy season:Prior to,during and following the rainy season. ______ _ - / • ..-`-``"��- - 2. For areas subject to year-round rainfall:On a recurring basis(at least three times per year). - - - . . -� ,i / /_-' - _ - •`p/ - / 3. For areas with winter snow and summer rain:Prior to and just after the snow season and during - �' __ ,:.G'?-`- the summer rain season. w 1 O / .• .' 4. For installed devices not subject to the elements(washracks,parking garages,etc.):On a recurring � -- / 1 ,/ _ _ - / ,' ,' •- � \. basis(no less than three times per years). 11 00 /� ,�' SERVICE PROCEDURES: --�' 1611 - - - �' , - __ 1. The catch basin ate shall be removed and set to one side.The catch basin shall be visually O - �''''� �// _ _ 615 - _ ,'' ---- inspected for defects and possible illegal dumping.If ille al dumping has occurred,the proper T_ /' ( - 1 - - !%: P P gg P g P P - authorities and property owner representative shall be notified as soon as practicable. O W ,/ _... .� . . V. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _J 6 yi. N � 0/////// / : •� '`•`'`'`•`'`•`'`'`'`•`•`'`'`'`•`'`'` . . * INFI TRATION BENCH 2. Using an industrial vacuum,the collected materials shall be removed from the liner.(Note:DPS Q ' - :•:i°' : : :': : : :':': :':':':•:':'4':• -' =`-,':':•:•:':': ` uses aback-mounted vacuum for servicing Flo-Gard+Plus°catch basin inserts. O 0 ,. . .,. . . . . . . . . -_ , 1 _ g O 1 3 35$ 6 • •� - When all of the collected materials have been removed the filter medium ouches shall be , . . .�. . . . . . . DEP H:5 1 L removed b unsnapping the tether from the D-ring and set to one side.The filter liner,gaskets, �' 16 - .. �. . • -'-.'r.'. i' �%-,.•. Y PP g g , :'� . . �7 ,. . . . . . . . . . . Rr. . . . . . . . . . . . . . EE N R _ \ G ' _ i : . :': : : : :': : : :':': : : :': : : : :': : : :':':-:-: :': : : : :': :-:•:'. . . . . . . . : �. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 CA ACITY 6 71 stainless steel frame and mountin brackets,etc. shall be ins ected for continued serviceabilit . N11 '-`•`•'-`-'-`•'-' - - - : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ./. . . . . . . . . . . . .'. , ...' ; • • -'-•.'- . TAIL N SFIEE 04 \ Los. i �1' ' PER RE -3 0 C Minor damage or defects found shall be corrected on-the-spot and a notation made on the ZP �O 2d \ �� 16 .• �, 1 1 - _ _ �'� ... , 605 '-�.. 1..r. . t --- Maintenance Record.More extensive deficiencies that affect the efficiency of the filter(torn liner, O � ; - - _ - „, - .:; A OVL BLOW. _ -� ,'.-.-. etc.),if approved b the customer representative,will be corrected and an invoice submitted to the 00 aI , ' .•(•fl-. '•'�`�-` / 'r ' ' `• !• • - ITY 513 'CF re resentative alon with the Maintenance Record. uu � m � > 0 I ' n . or:::::o _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,( J ' , , :':''':'�•'•'•'•'•'-'•'•' -- f - 1 - J / - / �`O ,'� -11 - . _ _ _-- ____� 7 4. The filter medium pouches shall be inspected for defects and continued serviceability and replaced O o 0 .•r.. ^ . . . . . 0 X �-)-. /- f i�� �� , 16 \ ' :.:'-' - �''_ i as necessary and the pouch tethers re-attached to the liner's D-ring.See below. o y Z w `Qr -- ((ft ' ;�'// 1 » ' -- ' , » -_-- rr D PIP / _ :.:'. �: '' S. The grate shall be replaced. ��d�y 1211 5�Q li.'.I.' J / 1 �� Y / ,' » n 161 � ' r---1 ,/ .� -.•/!•.-.-..%% ,^ '' 7 '11 i / / J------ ---- - --- ) i '/WITHIFOSSIL FILTER. ` l (\, \__)' WI_ FILTER. _- ----- / r - •�Y. . .. ..•-LLr [ .r. .�I' . . : . . . : :•:•.•:•. : 1':':': : :':':': : . Maintenance of StormChamber Systems � •. o O (.l - L) - _ i�, I - ___ 1) - • ) » " WITH FOSSIL FILTER. `DRAIN"INLET c =_____ - -_== ) o ' I ` / \ 36"X36'% ~ ' y 4 Grated inlet structures. d / I � ( ( ,'SWI FOSSIL ILTER. \'�� PROPOSED URBSIDE Maintenance of StormChamiber® Systems O /) 11 _ 1 ___ _ -J _� �t'oW) DRAIN OUTLET The use of fully grated inlet structures will keep the vast majority of debris out of the p j I S ____---- _ - i ____- - ____--- -- _______ _-J ''' ^ PER STD 107-A StormChamber system. (It is suggested that these be placed near the entrance to the I i ! establishment being constructed as an incentive for owner maintenance). " -f- StormChambers provide great flexibility in facilitating maintenance tasks through � different arrangements of StormChamber system components. These can be used 5) Inlet structures with sumps. O individually, or in combination, to best accommodate local requirements, hydrologic ' \ � ( i parameters,and engineering design constraints. Each is discussed individually below: The use of inlet structures with a 2-4 foot sump is recommended. This will allow for W Q � I additional capture of sediment that can easily be removed with a vacuum truck or other 4 1) Pre-treatment devices. device before it gets into the StormChamber system. A sumped inlet structure placed at > both ends of the first row of StormChambers can also be used to facilitate sediment T F� (� Under normal circumstances, a pre-treatment device is not necessary. However, removal within the StormChamber system. Under this alternative, one or more �/ I-� r�•{ EXIST j' EXIST under certain conditions, or local requirements, pre-treatment devices can be useful. additional chamber(s)is added to the beginning and end of the first row,the end of each �( I 0 Z POOL i RESIDENCE Filtering,swirl concentrators,or other types of pre-treatment devices can be installed up- being inserted directly into the sumped inlet structures. This provides for physical access C/� I� Z ❑ stream Their the StormChamber system for removal of sediment, yeas,such oil and grease, into the first row for maintenance(see"Example Configurations"section). . ( 4 U jY ❑ etc. Their use is particularly helpful for stormwater"hot spot"areas such as automobile W W I i EXIST repair shops,where abnormally high concentrations of pollutants such as oil and grease 6) Protected stormwater inlets during construction. rW W W W M RESIDENCE ❑ can be expected. W Z � Z , � J �j o i D It is highly recommended that, under any of the above alternatives, the Z x N t,; I � O 2) Vacuum truck tube through 10 inch clean-out riser. StormChamber system not be opened to receive stormwater flows until construction of �H (-I U Z M i ( � O --- --- - the site has been completed. Even then, all stormwater inlets must be protected from SII/ W P4 W Z Z 0 ! The StormChambers are designed with a defined top portal area at the"down-flow" sediment loading until the site is completely stabilized. Complete stabilization implies Z Qt W P4 "7- 4 end of the chamber that can be cut out to accept up to a 10 inch diameter riser pipe (see that the construction site has been cleared of construction-related debris and has r, � Q C� 10" CLEAN OUT RISER AND drawings in this section). The 10 inch riser can be used as an observation well and for W Z C7 -< 4 DOWNFLOW END UPFLOW END incurred at least two storm events sufficient to wash most soil and other particulate STORMCHAMBER HEAVY » 9:64 1. UNDER-LYING SEDIMENTRAP access of a vacuum truck tube that can be used to remove sediment. The down-flow I'-I Z, I-a [ - - - - - - - � START CHAMBER WEIGHT NETTING U.S.PATENT#6,00,023&6,877,029 matter off impervious surfaces. (SUPPLIED) "ULTIMATE" BYPASS FEATURE ends of the StormChambers have end walls that are closed on the bottom (see enclosed W U kr C) (LOWERS & OPENINGS) drawings). The closed bottom functions similar to a coffer dam with most of the F'' �-•' Oo 10" CLEAN OUT RISER AS NEEDED, WRAP PIPE CD SEE DETAIL C "ULTIMATE" BYPASS FEATURE Inspection and Maintenance Schedule Imo' W U C sediment depositing prior to flowing into the next chamber, facilitating its removal h W 1n _�Q_ id _9L_ goAND UNDER LYING INLET WITH FILTER FABRIC (LOWERS & OPENINGS) � Do 8'-7" TO PREVENT INFILTRATION through the riser pipe,which is positioned directly above this area. It is recommended, Inspect through the risers quarterly and after each large storm event. It is 'z, W cn SEDIMENTRAP (D 04 jY ` START CHAMBER CONFIGURATION [ 8'-1" 7'-7" 8'-1" OF SURROUNDING AGGREGATE LL _;/ at a minimum, that clean-out risers be placed at the last chamber of each row of recommended that a log book be maintained showing the depth of water in the PLO 0 'W H 41 START CHAMBER IS CLOSED AT THE SIDE PORTAL END AND SLOTTED O DEPTH StormChambers which receive the flow from the stormwater inlet(s). StormChamber at each observation in order to determine the rate at which the .I ,•t t, C/� C/1 � r- AT THE TOP PORTAL END LAY UP LENGTHS STANDARD = 20 INCHES r StormChamber system dewaters after runoff producing storm events. Once the SHALLOW = 12 INCHES NOTE: *CUSTOM o 3) Sacrificial StormChamber row (in accommodation of the commonly utilized performance characteristics of the StormChamber have been verified, the 1. START CHAMBERS (CLOSED AT THE SIDE PORTAL END) ARE PLACEDi��4 4UP TO 30" 0.D. PIPE AS a management practice of benign neglect). monitoring schedule can be reduced to an annual basis, unless the performance AT THE INFLOW END OF THE ROWS. SPECIFIED data suggests that a more frequent schedule is required. Sediment should be -n%n��n� - _�- 1111 -nr 2. BEGIN PLACEMENTS WITH START CHAMBERS AND END ROWS WITH END An additional row of StormChamber can be added for accumulation of sediment removed when deposits approach within six inches of the invert heights of W CHAMBERS. OPTIONAL o p pp g g'-2" END CHAMBER � � OUT-FALL with minimal effect on the stormwater storage requirements of the system. This would connectingpipes between StormChamber rows or in sure ed inlet structures. 3. PLACE FIRST RIB OF NEXT CHAMBER IN THE ROW OVER LAST RIB AS NEEDED WRAP PIPE INLET WITH p p p I"II -, MIDDLE CHAMBER CONFIGURATION OF PREVIOUS CHAMBER. NOTE: PLACE STORMCHAMBER LIGHT FILTER FABRIC TO PREVENT DETAIL B be utilized as the "first row" of chambers -the row that accepts the stormwater flow 12" I.D. PVC MIDDLE CHAMBER IS COMPLETELY OPEN AT THE SIDE PORTAL END AND WEIGHT STABILIZATION NETTING INFILTRATION OF SURROUNDING SECTION VIEW DETAIL C from the inlet structures. Because the flow from the first row of chambers will have to SLOTTED AT THE TOP PORTAL END 8'-s,r CUT OUT GUIDE FOR SUPPLIED UNDER ALL STORMCHAMBERS FloGard®FILTER "ULTIMATE" make 90 de ee turns throu h connectin i es into the adjacent row velocity of flow Contact Hydrologic Solutions for technical assistance at 1.877.426.9128 = ( ) AGGREGATE -INSTALLED- BYPASS FEATURES g g p p mum - - - - - - - - 10" I.D. PVC 2'-1p" will decrease and most of the transported sediment load deposits within the first row of or email us at info@stormchambers.com StormChambers. ,�Q, _n 7 7 1 - 4'-8" 5'-O" MANY OTHER STANDARD&CUSTOM SIZES&DEPTHS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. i 8'-2" 1'-11 SPECIFIER CHART r. END CHAMBER CONFIGURATION _t I END CHAMBER IS COMPLETELY OPEN AT THE SIDE PORTAL END AND CLOSED AT STANDARD&SHALLOW STANDARD DEPTH SHALLOW DEPTH CUTOUT GUIDE FOR 8" DEPTH -201nches- -12Inches- IDE MODEL No. (Data in thesecolumesisthesamefor MODEL NO. TL�� 10", AND 12" PVC 1'-1" both STANDARD&SHALLOW versions) J WroLow roLoaie a 8" PVC RISER PIPE STANDARD SHALLOW INLET ID GRATE OD TOTAL SOLIDS FILTERED SOLIDS FILTERED CAST IRON DEPTH Inside outside BYPASS STORAGE FLOW DEPTH STORAGE FLOW A multi-disciplinary environmental consulting and water resources research company. A multi-disciplinary environmental consulting and water resources research company. /I� FRAME WITH Dimension Dimension CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY V/ COVER FOR PAVED AREAS FOR UNPAVED AREAS (inch x inch) (inch x inch) (cu.ft./sec.) (cu.ft.) (cu. ft./sec.) (cu.ft.) (cu. ft./sec.) 0 FOR PAVED AREAS 4 OZ. NON WOVER FGP-12F 12 X 12 12 X 14 2.8 0.3 0.4 FGP-12F8 .15 .25 3' X 3'REINFORCED INSPECTION CHAMBER 90% COMPACTED CLEAN FILTER FABRIC AT FGP-153OF 15x30 15X35 6.9 2.3 1.6 FGP-153OF8 1.3 .9 STC) - * - DESIGN ` - CONCRETE PADr \ I 7 __PAVEMENT 18" MIN FILL OR 3/4" 6" FGP-16F 16 X 16 16 X 19 4.7 0.8 0.7 FGP-16F8 .45 .4 Q CRUSHED WASHED STONE STONE/SOIL �� - 8 PCC PAVEMENT INTERFACE FGP-1624F 16 X 24 16 X 26 5.0 1.5 1.2 FGP-1624F8 .85 .7 Project Flame: hurrh Z 2 FGP-18F 18 X 18 18 X 20 4.7 0.8 0.7 FGP-18F8 .45 .4 En Inver_ AIIs ,4ltfi rn AE 90" COMPACTED f- MIN PAVEMENT B S g y I 1 X1 � �� F�!�1 C W 1'+fi� F�'• Cl) F P-1 2 F 6 9 5.9 2.1 1.4 F P-1 2 F 1.2 .8 G 8 0 G 8 0 8 18X21 - Locatlon_ Rancho Cucamon � O r - h qty fr dn71tl dnf ... ,. ...:.: ;...•............ ..°: :::,.:. •• 6" MIN FGP-1824F 16 X 22 18 X 24 5.0 1.5 1.2 FGP-1824F8 .85 .7 Date: Thurda9, October 4, 2018 LI HTWEI HT STABILIZATION G G O RISER SCH40 OR DL35 _ - - F - 18X36 - - - GP 1836E 6.9 2. 1.6 FGP 1836F8 1. 9 3 3 18X40 Q ��;�`•:`'° }mss. ��rat.�:t at �rf� s�rha�v�lr�rs-s���r ��� �21r` NETTIN PPLIED NDER -:�:1�".•'�c'.•'. ,,•.<:••-:•., r J O J G SU U �� '•'°' 3l4" - 2" CRUSHED ............ .::.,:��.A•< ::::,.<:.:...:.,.;<, ... �, .. 3 4" 2 CRUSHED - .... ........ .... . -° ;:•°_ R,r:ase note,if yr- it Project is East Of the Mississippi Riyer you:rill be uslnli,I{e S� 34 ohambe-r.If your project is West Of the Mississippl you will be using the SC 34W 6amb-r The SC-44 I_ O Q WASHED STONE WASHED STONE ""'. .° •• "' FGP-21F 22X22 22X24 6.1 2.2 1.5 FGP-21F8 1.25 .85 I 0' f '•CONNECTING CONNECTING ,/1 � LL.I O PVC PVC INFLOW P PE .� `1 J � - CAP ENDn H SIDE PORTAL IN FLOW PVC FGP-2142F 21 X40 24X40 9.1 4.3 2.4 FGP-2142F8 2.45 1.35 `■ �,t , ^, O Z J FGP-2148F 19 X 46 22 X 48 9.8 4.7 2.6 FGP-2148F8 2.7 1.5 a) I W Q END UNIT ER FABRIC Choose Measurement em tar o Volume Cubic Feet Ch M t Type Imperial Syst S age V I 5132 C b' F t � CV (D W U 4 OZ. NON WOVEN FI LT FGP-24F 24 X 24 24 X 27 6.1 2.2 1.5 FGP-24F8 1.25 .85 ■ Q 12" MIN 777 "''' " AGAINST TRENCH WALL FGP-243OF 24X30 26X30 7.0 2.8 1.8 FGP-2430F8 1.6 1.05 Required Storage Volume 5U45 j ;t' Minimum Internal Storage of a Chamber 73 Cubic Feet ♦A V_ z 12" CRUSHED (n I O t j START UNIT OPTIONAL IN FLOW FGP-2436F 24X36 24X40 8.0 3.4 2.0 FGP-2436F8 1.95 1.15 Choose the Chamber Model SC 34W Total Plumber Of Chambers Required 41 Z STORM CHAMBER WASHED STONE LO C Q SEDIMENT TRAP LOCATION (UP TO 30" 0.D. FGP-2448F 24X48 26X48 9.3 4.4 2.4 FGP-2448F8 2.5 1.35 0. CV G W O Based On the number of SedimenTraps incorporated, g PIPE) FGP-28F 28 X 28 32 X 32 6.3 2.2 1.5 FGP-28F8 1.25 .85 N Q STORMCHAMBER L hoose uesign L onstraint Width reduce the Total Number Of Chambers by O Q FGP-244OF 24 X 36 28 X 40 8.3 4.2 2.3 FGP-2440F8 2.4 1.3 U U TYPICAL SEDIMENTRAP LIGHT WEIGHT STABILIZATION 6.7' x 10' HEAVYWEIGHT g � 5 FGP-30F8 2.05 1.15 Design f�onstralnt Dimension 25 ft rfNy,ery{r„y„q f}p�f�d'T��' { �rh'n+�'¢tiK+d�'P=�,'�gt �}}'}�-fi$P} ��,± 7 � U NETTING (SUPPLIED) UNDER STABILIZATION NETTING L (, 12" PVC PIPE RISER FGP-36F 36 X 36 36 X 40 9.1 4.6 2.4 FGP-36F8 2.65 1.35 Stone Above Chambers[min- 6 inches; max. 192 6 in LAYER S � O ALL STORMCHAMBERS (SUPPLIED) UNDER FLOW SCH40 OR DL35 ATTACHED STORMCHAMBER FGP-3648F8 3.9 1.85 RECEIVING STORMCHAMBERS Q O TO STORMCHAMBER Stone Below Chambers[min- 6 12 in Lader Lent 84.25 ft RowsrChambl 3 Row(s) 1O Chambers 3: U TYPICAL VIEW FGP-48F 48X45 48X54 13.2 9.5 3.9 FGP48F8 5.45 2.25 = Z FGP-SD24F 24 X 24 28 X 28 6.1 2.2 1.5 FGP-SD24F8 1.25 .85 Total Cover Over Chambers (min. 18 inches. max- 18 in Layer Vidt 24.25 ft RowslChambl 1 Row(s) 11 Chambers (� < Stone Void(Industry Standard is 40 % Layer Dep, 4.33 ft Lager Installed Stora 5132 Cubic Feet Z NTS STORMCHAMBER DETAIL 1 41 Ro Gard® Oldeastle® Total Chambers in L. 0 stormwater Solutions Desired Number of Layers 1 AREA TABLE -- - _ Catch Basin Insert Filter 7,,,,, thpa,1Plaza,Suite 200!Littleton,CO!80120!Ph:800.579.8819!oldcasuestormwater.00m - Between each Layer (min. 12 Inches) 12 in NCtLfkvLR C THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST,INC.IT IS SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE r .+ ■111111111111111111 � USED IN ANYWAY INJURIOUS TO THE INTERESTS OF SAID COMPANY,COPYRIGHT02010 OLDCASTLE PRECAST,INC.ALLRIGHTSRESER""' Number Of ROWS Desired 4 1.arm Lend 0till 1; FlewslCha1Rb1 II ;- I 11 '-.I•xi;i 4 M1� Inlet DRAWING N0. REv Eco ECO-0127 °ATE - +I+�-f7 Filtration Grated Inlet Style FGP-0001 F JPR 5 18 15 JPR 11/3/06 SHEET 2 OF 2 !T:,c.n,.m Nambsi of Roar Baro-d on Cor.rtraink Dimar.rion {�' Lalp!1 VWL 0.fI(, II PowslChambi 11 . I LI �_,I13irii INFILTRATION DCV CAPTURED BY / � 1 oe Between Each Row (min- 3 inches) 9 I in L ae#1 Dep, u.UU II Layel lirslalled Skoda U L I. DA TOTAL AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA PERVIOUS AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA PERVIOUS AREA DCV BY LOT BED AREA UNDERGROUND �'~ x. (SF) (SF) (SF) PERCENTAGE PERCENTAGE (CF) (SF) INFILTRATION Number of SedimenTra s Desired 3 i p 1 1 alai'1�11r1d111kB1 s in L� 1 Minimum SUggwtad N-66r of Soliman rrap,, 2 # & '' NON TRAFFIC GRATE FOR LANDSCAPE AREA 0. 1 132,991.3 97,997.3 34,994 73.69 % 26.31% 11,760.8 3,358+1,915=5,273 6,717+5,132=11,849 'A 36" Do you need impervious liner s no I'IPL{+VE3l Number of Inflows 2 I.al-!p L1tni (I flit flc�rsrl'halrtb+ C1 r{-rl.l DA l 11 Lalei Vidt O.nn Ir-.r,-k•-�rrt'.t�L-�e.�,rw:rrr•-;: LEGEND NOTE: IU) 3» 3., L.I�eI Llgp� U'.n1 L��t r Ills+aileil ktal, � (n � � DCV = DA x C x a2 x P6 /12 a, = 1 .4807 a2= 1 .963 » » I a4 all C h�mb*r 11i ILS+ W H POST CONSTRUCTION BMP NOTE THE DCV BY PROJECT PROPERTY IS -: 3 3 CM WW.W W.W LANDSCAPE P6 = Pyr,,hr x a I-0.7369 11 , 760.9 CF BUT THE DESIGN PROVIDED r2�2ALrr r2� A�tr r s �{ raw- _ IMPERVIOUS AREA DISPERSION P6 = 0.688 x 1 .4807 = 1 .02 3 358 SF OF INFILTRATION TRENCH WITH II ,• -1-1--,1 #g77*.d =171 Minimum Trench Length 04.25 ft 05 O Q 3 2 PRE-CAST 14" 14" Minimum Trench Width 24.25 ft UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION AREA C = 0,858I 0.78I + 0.774I +0,04 5 FT DEPTH 40% POROSITY THAT HAS CATCH BASI I` FORM SLOPED BOTTOM System Depth 4.33 ft CD BUILDING C = 0,858(0,7369) 0.78(0.7369)+0.774(0.7369)+0,04=0,53 j` W T_ DCV = 132 991 .3 x 0.53 x 1 .963 x 1 .02/12 = 11 760.8 CF CAPACITY OF 6 716 CF AND 41 I Trench Depth 5.33 ft a STORM DRAIN SYSTEM AND WASHED STO Minimum Bed Size Required 1915.13 Square Feet } SIGNAGE ON PROP. CATCH BASIN STROMCHAMBERS WITH 6" STONE ABOVE & TORM DRAIN SYSTEM 12" 12» z C0 AC PAVEMENT 12" BELOW THAT HAS CAPACITY OF 5, 132 1 % , SYstEmCamponents J w Q o EFFICIENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND TEtIILLI GN SIGNAGE Lu LANDSCAPE DESIGN, WATER CF SO THE TOTAL CAPACITY OF BMPS IS ��N ALL PROPOSED CATCH � Q SIDEWALK CONSERVATION, SMART CONTROLLERS 11 , 849 WHICH GREATER THAN 11 , 76O.8, BASINS (NTS) Minimum Amount of Stone Beguiled 204.45 Cubic Yards rn D D U AND SOURCE CONTROL. (APPLIES TO ALL THEREFORE THE DESIGN MEETS THE 6" 6" Volume of Excavation (not including fill) 307.37 Cubic Yards LANDSCAPING AREA) :'.a:;r.4', Nan-woven Filter Fabric Required 428.41 Square Yards 0) - - - - - DMA BOUNDARY REQUIREMENTS. -I Scour Protection Mat 2 Pieces (N NOTE: BMP SIZING AND LOCATIONS ARE NTS 361'X361' DRAIN BOX DETAIL 2 �. ioub `ILLI O FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL ONLY AND -34E � 40 DMA-X DMA INFORMATION WILL BE UPDATED WITH THE PRECISE 0 X,XXX SF GRADING PLAN. 20' 0 20' 40' 60' O O V0 XX.XX AC W LLJ SCALE: V = 20' _ J 0 I LL. REVISIONS BY 0 w 12-04-2019 PLANT LEGEND Z w M SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS REMARKS QTY. a TREE U Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak 24" box Low Standard trunk 4 0 Ln A Quercus coccinea Scarlet Oak 15 gal Low Standard trunk 3 0 Z o Koelreuteria paniculata Golden Rain Tree 24" box Moderate Standard trunk 17 0 Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 24" box Moderate Standard trunk 31 = • Lagerstroemia x. 'Biloxi' Biloxi Crape Myrtle 15 gal Moderate Standard trunk 15 V) Z + Lophostemon confertus Brisbane Box 24" box Moderate Standard trunk 43 0 Z 0 • Geijera parvifolia Australian Willow 15 gal Low Standard trunk 3 a ��� Phoenix canariensis Canary Island Date Palm 15' trunk Low Standard trunk 1 Cn SHRUB Z Buxus micro. japonica Japanese Boxwood 5 gal Moderate 191 0 �l Callistemon 'Little John' Dwarf Bottlebrush 5 gal Low 123 0 o Ligustrum j. Texanum Texas Privet 5 gal Moderate 427 Nandina domestica 'Nana' Dwarf Heavenly Bamboo 5 gal Moderate 74 0 0 ��� Raphiolepis indica 'Ballerina' Indian Hawthorn 5 gal Moderate 143 w Rosa hybrids Hybrid Tea Rose 5 gal Moderate Moderate 125U-1 OSalvia greggii Autumn Sage 5 gal Low 36 VINES w PHIL MAY w Parthenocissus tricuspidata Boston Ivy 5 gal Low plant @ 10' o.c. 16 Q LANDSCAPE PERENNIALS ry ARCHITECT Aloe striata Coral Aloe 1 gal Low 89 Anigozanthos f. 'Bush Gold' Yellow Kangaroo Paw 1 gal Low 344 0 1937 West 9th Street O■ Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca 1 gal Low 42 Upland, CA 91786 o • ' Tulbaghia violacea Society Garlic 1 gal Low 87 Phone: 909 373 1959 w GROUNDCOVER o Fax: 909 3731958 Uj { Baccharis pilularis 'Pigeon Point' Dwarf Coyote Brush 1 gal Low plant @ 8' o.c. 66 pmay@philmaydesign.com Of Lantana x 'New Gold' New Gold Lantana 1 gal Low plant @ 5' o.c. 70 o www.philmaydesign.com Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana 1 gal Low plant @ 5' o.c. 84 w 0 vvv Myoporum parvifolium 'Pink' Pink Australian Racer flats Low plant @ 12" o.c. 1 1 0 X o vPNDscgA� a S. May y 0' 20 40' 50' 60' N ® w �- ��ti Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine flats Low plant C�? 12 o.c. 110 ro - 'o M a - W SIGNATURE C7 - Ln Cr 05-31-19 I - - - - - - y RENEWAL DATE _ Z T w 1634. 5 LOW SPREADING SHRUBS AND o STREET TREES PER FLOWERING GROUNDCOVER ACCENT TREE SPECIES AND SqMHZ CITY STANDARDS SHRUBS LAYOUT PER ETIWANDA SPECIFIC U) WHITE FENCE ALONG LOW SPREADING SHRUBS AND E ( 24TH STREET zFLOWERING GROUNDCOVER TS O N A v E N LI ° PLAN (FIGURE 5-11 ) HORSE TRAIL (TYPICAL) i v ° v ° v ° vv ° ° vvvv ° vvv ° 7777777 L U/v Z SHRUBS 7 1717 7717 - 177 - 177 ♦ 77777 77 - x7777 7 1 + + 7 7 777777777 77777 7777 7771s7 � Jxx DOG - 77 777777777 717 °0 ° 777 v � 777777 7777 77 7777 t 777 777 7777 77777 b�- - 77 � vv vvv 7171777 7777 77777 777777 + 7 7777 • • • + ✓ x1717 7777 1717 777777 77777 ° 7777 vv 77x7V- 77777 7777 7777 7777 7777777 + 7 171777.7 + 7 - - 77x7 - - 77x77 77777777 7V- 7x7 w 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 17 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 17.17 x 17 x 17 7 7 7 7 7 7 ° 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 V V� a° /� v ° ° ° 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 + 7 7 7 7 7 x 17 7( .`r✓ [ ° 7 7 7 7 I U 7717 7V 7777 777 777 + + 777 777777 777 77 774777 7777 7777777 77 777777 7777 7776 777 v � - a (`/7° 777777 7 77777 ` 77 777 k, i1�/'7 717 = \\ 7 7 7 x 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 + . 7 '7"7"7 1717x d 7 x 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 17 + + 7 7 7 7 - 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ° 7 7 V V 7 7 7 7 7 a ° 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 17 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ° 7 7 7 a } + 777 ✓ 74777 77 7 177 - a 777 77717 7xx� 17 - x7 - - 7777717777717 7777 77777 717 7777717 7717 777777 71777 - 77x7 - 177x17 - 7 ° 717 7717 7777v 7777 7 + 7777 ° 777 FSx17 177777717 7777 77717717 7777 17777 + + 717 777717 771717 77 � 777 777771717 777717177 /777777 /777 17xxx17171717xxx171717xxx1717177777717�17J 1777777777777717 aw 17v ° , 77 777777 777777777777717 17x17 1777 } 17 17 177 - - 177 77777 7 - - 77 7 - - 77 7777 7777777 7 - - 77x7 17x7 - - 77x7 - - x777777777777777777777777777777777 - 7 777777777777 '7V °B ' 77177717717717177 777 x77777777 - 7 77x7777777777 + ` 177 � 7 0 .49 + 77 7777 77771717 x 777771717 171777771717777 17171717x177177777717777771717777771777777777777V 1777777177777717 7 - 17 17 ° 77 ° a ° 7717777771777 - 7 /777777 /7777 1717 7 Pte, 777 Z + V77x 77777777 7777777 717 7 � � � � � 77�- -� 7e-e-e-e� 77�v-��77 77��7777777777777777777777777 7 ` 777 7777 a ° ° ✓ 7777 + 7777777777777 77777 ` 7 � a 777 g 77vvv7v777777777777777777 77 77777777 777777 7777777777771777777177777777777v - 7777717 /7777777777 - - 77777777777 + + 777777 a °a WA,TSR° ° + 777777771777777777 77777 Q ° - - � � a 177777777777777777777 17 77777 7777777 17171777x777771 17717 - 77777777 77777777 777777 17 - 7777777777 77777 x17 ° ° p° + 777777777777777777 7777 /N 77777777777777x77 77x7717 7777777 - 77777 - 777777 777 - - 7777 - - 7 177 - - 77777 - 77 - - 7777 - - ` 777 7 - ° STRUCTU E a ° a ° ° ° °1 ° ° v 1 ) SIDE ALK °° 7xxxxxxxxx7 ° xxxxx xx77�-77717x7777777777 + x777717 ° ° 7e�a7 ° x xxxxxxxxxxxxxx77 xxxxxxxx ° ° ° ° ° ° _ 417x17 I a w a ^ 717717x7 7 - 7717 7 - 77 - x7 - 77777 - 7 + 7 - - 7bx7 - - 7x777 ° 77777 - - 7 + + ° ° a ° ° ° ° // ° ° �' 7 7 7 - 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 x 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 17 - 7 x 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 - 7 7 7 �./ ., ° a ° 4 ° 7 I - + 0 ° 7177717 1717171717x171777777717 + a xxx 17171717x1717 17x77717 ° a ° ° ° ° + + + + a WALK ° ° ° Z } � 7 ° v ° ° ° a 7 - - 7 x77 - 7 17x7 - - 77 + + 7 - - 7 x77 - - 7 x17 - - 77 ° ° SIDE 7 717177 \ o + 77 ° 71717xv ° a ° ° 1717 - 1777777V 17777717 7 - 71717x17 17 � ° 171717x171717 7777 1777 V) rn + + - 7717x7 - - 717x77 ° ° ° ° (N� 7777s x17 - 177 ° CN SIDEWALK . �7 x17 - - 77 7 / 77x7 �nl) S�D w'�K ° ° ° ° v - 7V x77 - - 7x17 - - 7 + + + ° xxx17xxxxx1717x 171717171717x17 xxxx17xxxx ° E a ° ° vxx17xxxxx17x 1717x17 xxx + r xxx � + 717x7 - - 717x7 - - ° IDE�/gL°K a °° o ° 17x7 - - 7717 + + + 77x77 - - 717x7 - - ° ° ° - - 717x7 - - 7 x77 �v7xx - - 717 77 I wa + 7777777717x � xxxxxx ° /� /� xxxxx xxx xxxx17xxxxx1717xxxxx ° xx1717xxxxx17xxxxx17xxxxx17 xxxx 7 xxx Q + + ° ° ° ° W 17 x 7 - - 7 17 x 7 - - //�� J - 7 17 x 7 - - 7 x 17 - 7 a 7 17 x 7 - - - 17 x 7 - 7 7 17 7 - 7 7 x 7 7 - - 7 17 x 7 - - 7 17 x 7 - - 7 7 x \ - 7 17 x 7 - - 7 17 x 7 - - 7 x 7 7 - - 7 x 17 - I x x 17 x x x x xxxxx �'�{ J x x x xxxxxx x x 17 x x x x x 17 x x x x V 17 x x x x x 17 x x x x x 17 17 x x 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 � x 17 — — — — — -------- -- -- -------------------------- -- -------------- —-- - ----—--------- ------------------------- —_—- --------- --- ----- - -- ------------------------------12 WIDE HORSE TRAI --- ----- ° N - -- ----------------------- —-- -- -- --------------------------------------- �' 12' WIDE HORSE TRAI L 12' WIDE HORSE TRA I L f L I I w a 3FS 12' WIDE HORSE TRAIL 12 WIDE HORSE TRAIL I I W J I I °° w ------------ ---- ----- ---------- ------------ -------- ------- ----- r R ~k RL -- !-- -- -!— I ' aNJ _ — — — � 4.• t a 16 Wilm (�: -. � _ ! _ �� _ - - _ - fir. �.• .,� � 41L 40 • 4 4/1 xr — - p.= r F 'L %Now tf{ L :4 Of opt ¢ .00, dK t warVF 't k. Ski k. r •}+ 1 7 I� _ i`y."* t _ x . . _ ;' �'{ .' a� J � .1 1� �' �'T.7J,7 :5 J' •{M1 �� •r• I N. I 1 ti I r I ��•� •� � � ... ';`{�_�r r S' 7~S!' •i_� d . •5!'•y''�� F i�' ,. ?LL.�.'- i 4.4x14 ITJ Cy 'ti. ■,7`I`y.II'`` `L ' :111 .d,F 4`yl :: : tSM :l�2•i:a + r 11 s �� �`�' + F �5\%' .. �' k y x �' 1 F .!!•FFF J IN. 4 L `Y ■ r •J I:. irl L iiilll L s �, Wlw f rl '' 1k 5x -, ' {r`_ rte• ' }r� _ # 1 �J ,•_ :� ,. �.•Y I� III �' �''tr•:X yrr Y J F I S 5 a i ! 1 L rag. A IJ,06dr ` 1 ir�L. 5' fi.R '� 1 •y '' F x 1 JL ' I 1 Y • ik•� Lv �- J � ' ' r * i•} y'=� '*lam } : I4I :4L + r � � r 'L k J • f r 5 L•J 4 : S•• F. - jo 1p L .�• iii+ : .1 { rFk J ' 1 y i r• t' t f 1 ' - . } T r:�• r# •t ++, L t V. Okia 1111 •a�� rh �_ J - • .•� A - •• •tea d, her Now mom 1 � — - fjL .. .:?6L r:t; r'r,� 6. !Ir 3% A• y n�I�' T f� . 1 r - J'Al y ' L T� � y L*L,•i _ _ , 4' r '' } _ L ' fr •• , r - }�: r 4 r Pi r '7 i ' + _ J mot 76 1p L • .3 ' -�. •Y} -tis_. • Irl -� } 1 I • .I .}yam. , � _-r '�,• ' � ' a� I I 3 j � ~• • � •iy . •� r C• r - _ L , . 1,� �• � • _- - . . _ - v ., I : •F- � � . r r' J.A6 :kms 3''•m� �1 F t s Y - 4 J �.. ••••� ti / FIR lop IWF IP OP F 'L t ; f t� 1 f a j r — J} vi r16 4k 1 IL Jr r L k ■ 1 � ' � • _ I ray •� ' F ' �4 06 }} _ - Y. i f • _ _ _ _ v Y '' ' ■ a t J J' v —` 'A or 7- Fjwr ' - ' L. 3r IF ilk �L y'~ 1� �r -L * •I � �'•• . . • �. �. � , • y 46 �'i � �*� -ice � � ~ - � '• 'i v L L' �; �ti dir L4 NA ir J JJ ffpr t --ii77 �i r K:Ir kol 04 ep It Jde, or IR LY d 40 pr IMP pt F r f } % _ f { L rr r; r r Jr J+ �7 '� _ �• - _ 'w-=•�,,�1�n�� }�}�a ~ �,� _s��- 'J _��v 'l ��, +' 'r +{r - f� •� � +' .•� �.� � L. `71y '' =Y�? - �r� � aryC' 1� ?L r•.� e dl x - �~ r 44 JF id '1 r '40* '�� w •� w: r• -tea � V — Pr iflLrF rp J � >• f J w# i l � •k - rr - - I - r r 'Y + ' T • Yr } r 1 F J . 1 r fik 1 � I RP 4 •L'ti+�� M1 , S r 1 I � I I Lti 4 L ' r I , 1 rd + ,� y 4 ,'+rte• - 4 1 de I • % I a ■ lit a 15 ,. fr r • � `rte � . M ' 40 jo jr - '} �• - i % + r J 1 II - I I _ I � ��r•_r 1 r 3 - zr. # r {{ or d611ft. i.. Iti • l a 5 ' r� yr a I r I •� r r — � L+ I v rl L F Y7 v y r rC .+ rr r• L ••fir /}�'•opv r ' .4 k k rJw. Il r� •f +i p - �4 V`. f % +� qL t d1!L ti +% � r 99, • L1•F � � � r r- ire � � * + r _ jp { j - M1 - L r dq L Y. %L- - , ` {7 p t kr .'Lti F k f rf+ • L i �� I + r {, . - I'ANF- 9 } � N. rte• ����� 1 �` Y r ++ Weil % 19 iP PA Ar ill k ry ' f r � • �r X I ti k Pik •� ALL: } N, yI r r ' r �• ice" f } z#, X7•1 9mrr I 1 Ir L �} I % s .'�T .• •'h• Lr - F� IL 1 T7i vvyv }�•� '- k I • L ,- %9 •� 3'• 1 i A 1 } •� to s.- 9 r }�L IL + y MPM I � ' f art' ~ • v L� � 4 rr I f ± t r r, } 11p,` # : 1 `9F •,y= n -�• y - _- 90 ' k .r�' y� v '• Wf }{ r' ••vfvti• a r i .,� _ t � r ; y * r _ � v• 7 ylX r. 1 4W y 1 .9 { r _ � y •• r -L l+L i+ j Jr f •-*' 7 tC• L 4 1L� i jar +Jo. 5 4 � r �� � '�• } � • fir. ad •}.. L OL re go IL r.. r k M1 k : 1J Y , Of IF 7 NP N6 I jo 9.4 • P 4d 1 r4 acb 03L\ am 2 io3ZL\--L\. Syrian Orthodox Church Of Antioch Archdiocese of the Western United States St. Elias Church To Whom This May Concern, We The Syriac Orthodox church has been operating in various States in the United States for over six years, The Saint Elias Church is part of the Syriac Orthodox Church, whom is a small Christian Community based Church. Our Church followers in Rancho Cucamonga, and the surrounding area accumulate to approximately around 200 families. We have been located in the area for over 10 years, renting locations but now seek to have Church grounds, and a place of worship of our own.As shown in our design for the 5734 East Ave property, (File Number: DRC2017-00193)that we have a Church Building and Worship Center in our proposal that displays in detail how the the use and functionality will take place in times during Church activities and other social events. Building 1: Church Use 1. Church Use will be used for Mass every Sundays and takes place from 12:00 P.M. to 2:00 P.M. 2. Family Nights are held ever last Tuesday of the Month from 6:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. 3. Maundy Thursdays from 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. 4. Good Friday from 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M -Sunday school will operate during the same time a Church Services Attendance of the Mass is an average of 150+Persons and 75+ Children. During the Holidays and other Special Occasions the attendance is more. In times of grief the church will offer its services from 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Building 2: Worship Center 1. Every Sunday after the Mass a social gathering of fellow followers will take place in the worship center from 2:00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. 2. Family Nights 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. 3.Youth Meetings will occasionally take place in the Worship center(No More Than Twice a Year) 4. Senior Citizens Gatherings will also occasionally be held at Worship Center(No More Than Twice a Year). 5. Baptism/Weddings are special occasions and might take place in there. -All use of the facility will be available for members only.All events will be held inside the building. Our private Facility will be open to the community and all Government agencies who are in need of use upon availability of the center. For any questions please feel free to contact Our Board member in charge of the project Frank Salhab via phone at 909-561-3934 or email at franksalhab@msn.com Sincerely, Fr.John Askar Saif November 11,2019 l Exhibit C 039 I TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag March 11, 2020 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193— GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low(VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225-123-05. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. Site Characteristics and Background: The 3.28-acre (143,041 square foot) project site is located at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The vacant project site is covered in native and non-native grasses and scrubs. The dimensions of the rectangularly shaped project site are approximately 660 feet from east to west and 216 feet from north to south and generally drains from north to south. The street improvement along East and Wilson Avenues adjacent to the project site have not been completed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan Single-Family Very Low (VL) Residential District South Residences Very Low Etiwanda Specific Plan East Vacant Land Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan Project Overview: The applicant proposes developing a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. As part of the project, the applicant will be required to construct the East Avenue street improvements along with paying in-lieu fees to construct one-half of the Wilson Avenue street improvements. The project will also be required to construct the 12-foot wide Community Trail and 8-foot wide sidewalk/bike path along Wilson Avenue on land owned by the Metropolitan Water District, as shown in Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The plans submitted for review include the required 12-foot wide Community Trail and 8-foot wide sidewalk/bike path as required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Staff Comments: The site plan and Wilson Avenue street section included with the submitted plans show the alignment of the required 12-foot wide community trail and 8-foot wide sidewalk/bike trail, in conformance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project will be conditioned to provide a 4-inch Exhibit D 040 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS DRC2017-00193— GEORGE BOTROS March 11, 2020 Page 2 cover of decomposed granite and PVC fencing per Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1002-B. Major Issues: None Secondary Issues: None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Trails Advisory Committee approve the proposed Community Trail and sidewalk/bike trail as presented. 041 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGif 2 4 L slowd M — MARCH 1172020 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. 6:00 P.M. —CALL TO ORDER g-n Roll Call: Francisco Oaxaca _X_ Tom Tisler(Bicycle) _X_ Tony Morales _X_ Carol Douglass (Equestrian) _X_ Bryan Dopp (Alternate) Mike Smith (Staff Coordinator)_X_ Additional Staff Present. Gianfranco Laurie, Sr. Civil Engineer; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager;Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Trails Advisory Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion.Any item may be removed by Committee for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 12, 2020. Page 1 of 3 042 CITY . ■ . ! . ! iV MARCH 11 , 2020 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE D. DISCUSSION ITEMS D1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 — GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225-123-05. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. TAC raised the following questions and concerns: 1. Would the project be required to construct half of Wilson Avenue at the time the project is constructed? Staff responded that the project would be required to pay an in-lieu fee of the future construction of Wilson-East Avenue street improvements. 2. Will the Wilson-East Avenue intersection continue to have a roundabout when fully completed? Staff responded that an upgraded roundabout would be included when Wilson Avenue is fully improved. 3. Where the East Avenue crosswalk will be located? Staff responded that the crosswalk will be located to the south of the entrance to the roundabout. 4. Committee member Tom Tisler stated that from his experience roundabouts are unsafe. The project was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission by all the Committee members (Oaxaca, Morales, Tisler, Douglass, Smith). D2 DISCUSSION OF STEP-THRU BARRIER REPLACEMENTS AT FLOOD CONTROL ENTRANCES (Oral report). D3. DISCUSSION OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (Oral report). Page 2of3 043 W MARCH 11 , 2020 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE E. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Trails Advisory Committee to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. G. ADJOURNMENT 7:30 PM I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant II of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, March 05, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 3 of 3 044 RESOLUTION NO. 20-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00194, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE OPERATION OF A PROPOSED 12,350 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH AND 18,033 SQUARE FOOT SOCIAL BUILDING ON A 3.28 ACRE (143,053 SQUARE FOOT) PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST AND WILSON AVENUES IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-123-05. A. Recitals. 1. George Botros filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2017-00194, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of April 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 22, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is comprised of a parcel totaling 3.28 acres of land located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues; and b. The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 045 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-22 CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEOGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan South Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan East Vacant Land Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan C. The proposed project includes the construction of a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building. The two buildings will face each other and will be separated by a common courtyard. The east (rear) elevation of the church will face East Avenue; and d. The church will hold services on Sundays between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m., followed by a social gathering/meal in the adjacent social hall. The applicant estimates that attendance for church services, based on their current church attendance in the city of Upland, will be approximately 150 persons along with 75 children, with increased attendance for religious holidays and other special events. The church operation will also include monthly family nights, youth meetings and senior citizen gatherings. Additionally, church members may use the church and social building for weddings,funerals and other related events. These special events currently occur no more than once monthly; and e. Access to the project will be from a single driveway from East Avenue with a separate emergency access gate at the terminus of Rolling Pasture Place.; and f. The proposed church provides 167 parking spaces, 28 parking spaces over the minimum requirement; and g. The project includes Design Review DRC2017-00193 for the operation of the church. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Very Low and a zoning designation of Very Low (VL) Residential District. Churches are permitted in the Very Low (VL) Residential District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, the project complies with the City's building height, setback, parking, landscape, and architectural standards. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is located in an area dominated by residential land uses. The project site will provide vehicle access from a public street 046 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-22 CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEOGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 3 and public utilities are located on or adjacent to the project site. The attached standard conditions include conditions of approval related to parking, noise and light glare to reduce potential impacts on the surrounding residential land uses. C. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Environmental studies were prepared by the applicant's consultants reviewing the projects potential impact on the environment related to air quality/greenhouse gasses, biological resources, noise, and traffic. The reports determined that the project would not have a negative impact on the surrounding land uses. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines.The project qualifies under a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1)the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan land use designation is Very Low and the zoning designation is Very Low (VL) District, which permits the development and operation of a church subject to a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing residential development and City infrastructure. The following are the five environmental factors that need to be analyzed to determine that the project qualifies for the Categorical Exemption: a) Traffic:A Trip Generation Memo (Birdseye Planning Group)was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed church use will create an estimated 27 peak hour trips on weekdays and 86 peak hour trips on Sundays. The project's peak hour trips are on Sundays when there is generally minimal vehicle traffic. The proposed church will not negatively impact the operation of the nearest intersections. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group)was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project's construction phase could potentially create a significant or adverse impact.The analysis included three mitigations measures to reduce construction noise levels. With the implementation of these measures, the analysis determined that the project would have a less than significant impact. Conditions of approval to implement these mitigation measures have been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. c) Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and a Green House Gas Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group)were prepared for the project.The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District(SCAQMD)thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. 047 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-22 CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEOGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 4 d) Water Quality:A Water Quality Control exhibit (Plumb Engineering)was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to the water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological:A Biological Assessment Report(Advantage Environmental Consultants)was prepared for the project site. No critical habitat was recorded on the project site. No drainage features occur on the project site and no USFWS designated critical Habitat is located on the project site. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State-listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non-listed special-status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area.The Biological Assessment Report does recommend burrowing owl surveys and a nesting bird survey prior to grading. The requirement to perform these surveys has been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department determination of exemption,and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April 2020, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 048 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag March 17, 2020 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193— GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low(VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225-123-05. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. Site Description: The 3.28-acre (143,041 square foot) project site is located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The vacant project site is covered in native and non-native grasses and scrubs. The dimensions of the rectangularly shaped project site are approximately 660 feet from east to west and 216 feet from north to south and the site generally drains from north to south. The street improvement along East and Wilson Avenues adjacent to the project site have not been completed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan Single-Family Very Low (VL) Residential District South Residences Very Low Etiwanda Specific Plan East Vacant Land Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan Project Overview: The applicant proposes developing a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The two buildings will face each other and will be separated by a common courtyard. The east (rear) elevation of the church will face East Avenue. Access to the project will be from a single driveway of off East Avenue with a separate emergency access gate at the terminus of Rolling Pasture Place. A drive aisle will run along the perimeter of the two buildings, with parking stalls located along the north, south and west elevations of the two buildings. The applicant will be responsible for constructing the East Avenue street improvements along with paying in-lieu fees to construct one-half of the Wilson Avenue street improvements. The proposed wall along East Avenue will be required to match the existing East Avenue theme wall (Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) to the south. The project will also be required to construct the East Avenue community entry (Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan), the community trail and sidewalk/bike trail along Wilson Avenue (Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) and the landscaping between the north property lie and Wilson Avenue, on the land owned by the Metropolitan Water District. Exhibit E 049 DRC COMMENTS DRC2017-00193 — GEORGE BOTROS March 17, 2020 Page 2 The church and social building are designed with a Mediterranean architectural design theme that includes the use of smooth stucco, stone veneer, cast stone accents, and "S"tile roof. The church will have a maximum height of 35 feet, which is the maximum height permitted within the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The social building is designed to carry over the design theme of the church, but with a less formal appearance and will have a maximum height of 32-feet and 6- inches. The ground level floorplan for the church (9,400 square feet) includes the main sanctuary, classrooms for Sunday school, bathroom facilities, a meeting room, an office for the priest and a cry room. The second story of the church (2,950 square feet) includes additional Sunday school classrooms. The ground level floor plan for the social building (14,653 square feet) includes a large open floor plan for gathering and meals along with kitchen facilities, a smaller open gathering area, and bathroom facilities. The second story of the social building (3,380 square feet includes offices, dressing rooms, storage areas, and bathroom facilities. The project complies with each of the related Etiwanda Specific Plan development standards for the Very Low (VL) Residential District as shown on the following table: Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback 35 Feet 78 Feet Yes East Avenue Building Setback 20 Feet 61 Feet Yes North Property Line) Building Setback 10 Feet 46 Feet Yes South Property Line Building Setback 20 Feet 139 Feet Yes West property line Parking Setback 15 Feet 38 Feet Yes East Avenue Lot Coverage 40 Percent 18 Percent Yes Building Height 35 Feet Maximum 35 Feet Yes Parking: Parking for churches is based on the number of fixed seats in the main sanctuary. In this case, there will be 416 fixed seats in the main sanctuary, which translates into a parking requirement of 139 parking spaces. The proposed church proposes 167 parking spaces, 28 parking spaces in excess of the minimum requirement. Parking RatioRequired Parkin Provided Parkin Churches (416 1 Per 3 Seat in Sanctuary 139 Spaces 167 Spaces Seats Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed buildings architecture and site plan layout, which will complement the residential development to the south and west. The buildings are well designed and architectural design elements are applied to each elevation ("360 degree architecture"). The two buildings will be separated by a landscaped courtyard and will be surrounded by generously landscape walkways, landscape planters and a parking lot. The project site is located at the northern terminus of East Avenue and the eastern terminus of Wilson Avenue and will be required to install or pay Engineering Department in-lieu fees to install the street and right-of-way improvements, along with the East Avenue community entry improvements and the East Avenue theme wall. The project complies with all requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Development Code. 050 DRC COMMENTS DRC2017-00193 — GEORGE BOTROS March 17, 2020 Page 3 Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. East Avenue fronting walls shall be designed to conform with the East Avenue theme wall as shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Install the East Avenue community entry improvements per Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Install community trail and sidewalk/bike trail per Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1002-B. 4. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 5. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides by 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the buildings. 6. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. 7. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented for final review. 051 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 0(14h. MARCH 17, 2020 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER 7:00pm Roll Call: Diane Williams _x_ Tony M. Guglielmo _x_ Mike Smith x Alternates: Bryan Dopp Francisco Oaxaca Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Please sign in after speaking. C. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Committee at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes February 18, 2020. Page 1 of 3 052 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCM MARCH 17, 2020 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE D. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. Please sign in after speaking. D1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193— GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low(VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific; APN: 0225-123-05. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation and oral report. Following the report, staff was asked by the Committee about the large landscaped area located immediately to the north of the project site. Staff stated that it was property owned by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). The landscaping was going to be installed by the applicant to enhance the area. The Committee also asked about the construction of an uncompleted segment of Wilson Avenue located along the north side of MWD's property. Staff stated that the street will not be constructed until the vacant properties on the opposite (north) side of the future street were developed (which is not pending). The applicant will be required as a condition of approval to pay in-lieu fees to cover their share of the construction of the street. The Committee asked if the "social building"that is part of the project is open to the public. Staff and the applicant indicated that it would only be for private events conducted by the church. Page 2 of 3 053 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA it MARCH 17, 2020 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE DRC recommended approval to the Planning Commission with no significant issues or concerns raised. 1,X Recommend approve to PC/PD. ❑ Recommend approve with revisions to PC/PD. ❑ Direct applicant to revise proposal and return to DRC for follow-up review. ❑ Recommend denial to PC/PD. ❑ Other E. ADJOURNMENT 7:15pm The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 12, 2020 at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 3 of 3 054 RESOLUTION NO. 20-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 12,350 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH AND 18,033 SQUARE FOOT SOCIAL BUILDING ON A 3.28 ACRE (143,053 SQUARE FOOT) PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EASTAND WILSON AVENUES IN THE VERY LOW(VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-123-05. A. Recitals. 1. George Botros filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2017-00193, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of April 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 22, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is comprised of a parcel totaling 3.28 acres of land located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues; and b. The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 055 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-23 DR DRC2017-00193— GEOGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan South Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan East Vacant Land Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan C. The proposed project includes the construction of a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building. The two buildings will face each other and will be separated by a common courtyard. The east (rear) elevation of the church will face East Avenue; and d. Access to the project will be from a single driveway from East Avenue with a separate emergency access gate at the terminus of Rolling Pasture Place; and e. The applicant will be responsible for constructing East Avenue street improvements which include street paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting.The applicant will also be responsible for paying in-lieu fees to construct one-half of the future Wilson Avenue street improvements along the project frontage. The proposed wall along East Avenue will be required to match the existing East Avenue theme wall (Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) to the south. The project will also be required to construct the East Avenue Community Entry (Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan), the Community Trail and sidewalk/bike trail along Wilson Avenue(Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan)and the landscaping between the north property line and Wilson Avenue, on the land owned by the Metropolitan Water District; and f. The church and social building are designed with a Mediterranean architectural design theme that includes the use of smooth stucco, stone veneer, cast stone accents, and "S" clay tile roof; and g. The project complies with each of the related Etiwanda Specific Plan development standards for the Very Low (VL) Residential District as shown on the following table: Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback 35 Feet 78 Feet Yes East Avenue Building Setback 20 Feet 61 Feet Yes North Property Line Building Setback 10 Feet 46 Feet Yes South Property Line Building Setback 20 Feet 139 Feet Yes West property line Parking Setback 15 Feet 38 Feet Yes East Avenue Lot Coverage 40 Percent 18 Percent Yes Building Height 35 Feet Maximum 35 Feet Yes 056 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-23 DR DRC2017-00193— GEOGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 3 h. The proposed church provides 167 parking spaces, 28 parking spaces over the minimum requirement; and i. The project includes Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194 for the operation of the church. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan. The project is for the construction and operation of a church and social building on a 3.28-acre project site within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The underlying General Plan land use designation is Very Low, which permits a wide variety of uses including churches. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of this Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which permits churches subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The project scope is for the construction of a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building. A conditional use permit (DRC2017-00194) is included as part of the entitlement review package. C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of this Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including building and parking setbacks, average landscape depth, lot coverage, parking, landscape coverage, site planning, and architectural requirements. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.The project applicant as submitted environmental studies related to air quality/greenhouse gasses, biological resources, traffic, and noise which review the project's potential impacts on the environment. That report determined that with the inclusion of mitigation measures related to noise and nesting birds, the project would not have a negative impact on the surrounding land uses. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines.The project qualifies under a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1)the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan land use designation is Very Low and the zoning designation is Very Low (VL) District, which permits the development and operation of a church subject to a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City 057 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-23 DR DRC2017-00193— GEOGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 4 limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing residential development and City infrastructure. The following are the five environmental factors that need to be analyzed to determine that the project qualifies for the Categorical Exemption: a) Traffic:A Trip Generation Memo (Birdseye Planning Group)was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed church use will create an estimated 27 peak hour trips on weekdays and 86 peak hour trips on Sundays. The project's peak hour trips are on Sundays when there is generally minimal vehicle traffic. The proposed church will not negatively impact the operation of the nearest intersections. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group)was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project's construction phase could potentially create a significant or adverse impact. The analysis included three mitigations measures to reduce construction noise levels. With the implementation of these measures, the analysis determined that the project would have a less than significant impact. Conditions of approval to implement these mitigation measures have been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. c) Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and a Green House Gas Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group)were prepared for the project.The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District(SCAQMD)thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality:A Water Quality Control exhibit(Plumb Engineering)was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to the water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological:A Biological Assessment Report(Advantage Environmental Consultants)was prepared for the project site. No critical habitat was recorded on the project site. No drainage features occur on the project site and no USFWS designated critical Habitat is located on the project site. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State-listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non-listed special-status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area.The Biological Assessment Report does recommend burrowing owl surveys and a nesting bird survey prior to grading. The requirement to perform these surveys has been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department determination of exemption,and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 058 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-23 DR DRC2017-00193 — GEOGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 5 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April 2020, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 059 Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, the City shall condition approval of subdivisions that are adjacent to any developed/occupied noise sensitive land uses by requiring applications to submit a construction-related noise mitigation plan to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 2. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with the City's noise standards or construction halted. 3. The construction-related noise mitigation plan required as part of the previous noise mitigation measure shall specify that haul truck deliveries be subject to the same hours specified for construction equipment (i.e., Monday through Saturday, 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. and not allowed on Sundays and national holidays). Additionally, the plan shall denote any construction traffic haul route where heavy trucks would exceed 100 daily trips (counting those both to and from the construction site). To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. The construction-related noise mitigation plan shall also incorporate any other restrictions imposed by City staff. 4. Electrical power shall be used to run air compressors and similar power tools. Internal combustion engines should be equipped with a muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer and in good repair. All diesel equipment should be operated with closed engine doors and should be equipped with factory-recommended mufflers. Construction equipment that continues to generate substantial noise at the project boundaries should be shielded with temporary noise barriers, such as barriers that meet a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 25, sound absorptive panels, or sound blankets on individual pieces of construction equipment. Stationary noise-generating equipment, such as generators and compressors, should be located as far as practically possible from the nearest residential property lines. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 060 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. Provide notification to residential occupants adjacent to the project site at least 24 hours prior to initiation of construction activities that could result in substantial noise levels at outdoor or indoor living areas. This notification should include the anticipated hours and duration of construction and a description of noise reduction measures being implemented at the project site. The notification should include a telephone number for local residents to call to submit complaints associated with construction noise. 6. Walls along East Avenue shall be designed in conformance with East Avenue theme wall per Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 7. Construct the East Avenue Community Entry per Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 8. Construct the Community Trail and sidewalk/bike trail along Wilson Avenue per Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the landscaping between the north property line and Wilson Avenue, on the land owned by the Metropolitan Water District. 9. The facility including special events shall comply with the performance standards outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.66 and the lighting standards outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.58. 10. If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon the adjacent businesses or operation, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration and possible termination of use. 11. The facility shall comply with the performance standards for noise and vibrations outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.66 (Performance Standards) and light glare outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.58 (Outdoor Lighting Standards). Standard Conditions of Approval 12. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 13. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 14. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 061 Page 2 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 16. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 17. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 18. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 19. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 20. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan 21. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 22. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 23. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 062 Page 3 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, `slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 25. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 26. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 27. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 28. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 29. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 30. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn-around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 31. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 32. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 33. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 34. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 35. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 36. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 063 Page 4 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 37. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 38. Prior to the removal of vegetation or ground-disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non-raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. 39. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the Planning Department within 24 hours of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 064 Page 5 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Traffic comments: 1. East Avenue improvements shall be installed in accordance with Etiwanda North Specific Plan "Secondary Arterial" standards as follows: a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, LED streetlights, street trees, drive approaches, signing & striping. b. Driveway approach shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. c. Street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. 2. Wilson Avenue improvements shall be installed in accordance with Etiwanda North Specific Plan "Special Divided Secondary Arterial" standards as follows: a. Construct south half of the street along the project frontage, including curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, LED streetlights, street trees, signing and striping. The north one-half of the road shall be 18' of pavement. Median island breaks will not be allowed on Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues. The developer shall pay a fee for future median landscaping. b. Interim roundabout at intersection with East Avenue to be in accordance with FHWA guidelines and CAMUTCD standards. c. Provide a traffic signing and striping plan. 3. Rolling Pastures Place shall be installed in accordance with Etiwanda North specific Plan "Local" standards as follows: a. Protect, provide, or repair existing curb & gutter, streetlights, sidewalk, drive approach, and signing & striping as required. b. Provide a reduced radius turnaround per City Standard No. 113 at the northerly terminus of Rolling Pastures Place and may be constructed within the existing right of way. c. Driveway approach shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. 4. All improvements including the access ramps shall be in accordance with the latest ADA standards, including but not limited to the southwest corner of East Avenue and Wilson Avenue. 2. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 065 Page 6 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. The south one-half of Wilson Avenue shall be fully improved in accordance with City "Modified Major with Median" standards and Figure 5-32 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan including curb, gutter, A.C. pavement, street lights, access ramp, sidewalk, street trees, traffic signs and striping, and transitions to existing pavement off-site. The north one-half of the road shall be 18' of pavement. Median island breaks will not be allowed on Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues. The developer shall pay a fee for future median landscaping. If Tract 16072, Tract 18908, or Tract 19992 develops first, they will be eligible for reimbursement to recover the proportionate cost of the improvements within the right-of-way. The fair share will be determined per an approved Reimbursement Agreement. 4. The street improvement plans shall show driveways at the reduced turn around cul-de-sac (City Std. Plan 113) on Rolling Pastures Place shall be as follows: a) No driveway into the church property b) If reconstruction of the Equestrian Trail driveways is required — City Std. Plan 101 Type R-1. 5. Site is located within Area 10 of the attached Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Developments of less than 5 acres are not required to construct storm drain facilities. However, they are required to show they are protected from flooding and shall pay Master Plan Storm Drain fees. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44-total feet on East Avenue The General Plan designation for East Avenue is a Secondary Street, and Wilson Avenue is a Modified Major Arterial with a median. 7. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails (if required within the project limits), public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 8. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of Grading Permit(s). All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 9. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 066 Page 7 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 11. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 12. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within or adjacent to their right of way: Metropolitan Water District 13. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts (LIVID 7, SLD 1, SLD7 and CFD88-1) shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 14. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: 15. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 067 Page 8 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name: East Avenue Curb & Gutter: 32-feet west of centerline A.C. Pavement Side-walk Driveway Approach(es) Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail: As required for the street crossing Bike Trail Other Street Name: Wilson Avenue Curb & Gutter: 39-feet south of centerline A.C. Pavement Side-walk : continue sidewalk from the west Drive Appr.: Not permitted on Wilson Avenue Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail: continue trail from the west Median Island Bike Trail Other: For Wilson Avenue, the plans shall be engineered and completed for use as a cost estimate to generate an in-lieu of construction fee to be collected. This in-lieu fee will be used for the future development of Wilson Avenue. The in-lieu fee shall be collected prior to the issuance of building permits. Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 17. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 068 Page 9 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 18. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 069 Page 10 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: East Avenue Botanical Name: Geijera parviflora Common Name: Australian Willow Min. Grow Space: Spacing: 45' o.c. Size: 15 gal. minimum Qty.: to be determined Street Name: Wilson Avenue (See Note 4 below) Botanical Name: Lagerstroemia hybrid 'Biloxi' Common Name: Crape Myrtle Min. Grow Space: Spacing: 35' o.c. Size: 15 gal. minimum Qty.: to be determined Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) For Wilson Avenue, the plans shall be engineered and completed for use as a cost estimate to generate an in-lieu of construction fee to be collected. This in-lieu fee will be used for the future development of Wilson Avenue. The in-lieu fee shall be collected prior to the issuance of building permits. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 20. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 070 Page 11 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: Wilson Avenue East Avenue 22. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 23. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 24. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 25. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations, and a soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The proposed structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC/CRC NFPA 13 and the Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. If it is anticipated that there will be a need for temporary fire protection water supply and/or temporary fire access, submit a separate plan for review and approval that complies with RCFD Standard 33-3. Platforms are required to be accessible by a ramp or lift in accordance with the latest edition of the CBC Chapter 11 B. Assembly occupancies with an occupant load greater than 300 are a Risk Category III, and require a seismic importance factor of 1.25 be used in the seismic vertical and lateral calculations. This project is located in the high fire area designated VHFHSZ and must comply to chapter 7A of the CBC. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 071 Page 12 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 072 Page 13 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 14. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 15. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 16. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (East Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 20. The proposed On-site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), i.e. a septic plan, shall be located near East Avenue to allow a future connection to a public sewer main. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 073 Page 14 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. The average high ground water level for the subject property is 102--feet below the surface of the ground. Therefore prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall provide as a project condition of approval a separately permitted On-site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), i.e. a septic plan, showing the maximum depth of any proposed seepage pits to be 10-feet above the average high ground water level (or 92--feet maximum below the ground surface). 23. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 24. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 25. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. 26. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 27. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 28. A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for any work within or adjacent to their right-of-way, including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written comments from MWD regarding site design restrictions within or adjacent to their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the City Engineer, or his designee, for review. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 074 Page 15 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for a commercial or industrial development, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer for reference a copy of the separate On-site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) plans for reference with the submittal of the precise grading plan. The separately permitted OWTS shall be submitted to the Building Official for review and permitting. The OWTS shall meet the requirements of current adopted Local Agency Management Program for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), which will allow site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 31. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 32. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 33. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer or his designee. 34. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 35. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 36. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 37. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 075 Page 16 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City Engineer or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 42. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 076 Page 17 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 45. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Also, prior to issuance of a grading permit the soils engineer shall prepare a project-specific percolation study meeting the requirements of the current adopted City of Rancho Cucamonga Local Agency Management Program for On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS). Note a copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety web page. 46. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 47. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 48. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 077 Page 18 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project-specific water quality management plan shall specifically address items b. and c. above. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 078 Page 19 of 20 Project#: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR/// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 50. The average high ground water level for the subject property is 102-feet below the surface of the ground. Therefore prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall provide as a project condition of approval a separate On-Site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), i.e. a septic plan, showing the maximum depth of any proposed seepage pits to be 10-feet above the average high ground water level (or 92-feet maximum below the existing ground surface). NOTE: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a Local Agency Management Program for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), which will allow site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 51. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. 52. The preliminary planting plan (sheet L-1 of 2 prepared by Phil May, Landscape Architect, dated 10-17-19) is proposing a storm water detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/23/2020 079 Page 20 of 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: April 22, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120 — SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA—A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 7 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18210) on 4.89 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; APN: 0225-171-04. On March 28, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: • Approve Time Extension DRC2020-00120 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BACKGROUND: On March 28, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, for the subdivision of 4.89 acres of land into 7 lots. Prior to that approval, the project was reviewed by the Grading, Technical, and Design Review Committees on January 16, 2007, and by the Trails Advisory Committee on March 14, 2007. Each Committee recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. The original approval of SUBTT18210 was on March 28, 2007, for a time period of 3 years. The original expiration date was on March 28, 2010. However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. The Planning Commission has also approved three separate one (1) year time extensions. The approval history and previous time extensions are as follows: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 Approving Authority Approval/Extension Type Approval Approval Expiration Date Period Date Planning Original Approval 3 Years 03/28/07 03/28/10 Commission 080 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120 - SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA April 22, 2020 Page 2 Senate Bill 1185 Automatic Time Extension 1 year 03/28/11 Assembly Bill 333 Automatic Time Extension 2 Years 03/28/13 Assembly Bill 208 Automatic Time Extension 2 Years 03/28/15 Assembly Bill AB) Automatic Extension 2 Years 03/28/17 116 Planning Time Extension 1 Year 02/22/17 03/28/18 Commission DRC2017-00028 Planning Time Extension 1 Year 03/14/18 03/28/19 Commission DRC2018-00054 Planning Time Extension I Year 03/13/19 03/28/20 Commission DRC2019-00048 Planning Time Extension 1 Year Proposed Proposed Commission DRC2019-00048 04/22120 03/28/21 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject 4.89-acre project site is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The project site is approximately 650 feet from north-to-south and approximately 330 feet from east-to-west. There is approximately 22-foot grade change from the north property line (1,540 feet) to the south property line (1,512 feet). An existing 15-foot-wide private equestrian trail is located along the east and south property lines. The project site has been regularly cleared of brush and is generally covered with short grasses. Curb, gutter and streetlights have been installed along the Banyan Street frontage. The applicant will be responsible for installing the community trail improvements along the Banyan Street right-of-way. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residential Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Estate Residential (ER) Residential District Residential Etiwanda Specific Plan South Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Residential Etiwanda Specific Plan East Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Residential Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Residential Etiwanda Specific Plan ANALYSIS: Municipal Code Section 16.16.170 allows for up to five (5) one (1) year time extensions of the original 3-year approval period of an approved Tentative Map. The application to extend SUBTT18210 was submitted on March 19, 2020, and includes a letter outlining the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit A). The time extension is being requested to provide the 081 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120 - SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA April 22, 2020 Page 3 applicant time to sell the project site. The subject tentative map will be eligible for one additional time extension with approval of this one (1) year time extension. Conformance with Development Code: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESN) and the Equestrian Overlay District. The project density is 1.43 dwelling units per acre (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre permitted). Required lot development standards and the provided lot statistics are as follows: Required Provided Lot Width 90 Feet 90 Feet Lot Depth 200 Feet 270 — 329 Feet Minimum Lot Area 20,000 SF 22,610 —33,050 SF Average Lot Area 25,000 SF 25,524 SF Water Quality Management Plan: A new set of Conditions of Approval were added to the Resolution of Approval of Time Extension DRC2018-00054 that address the City's new requirement that prohibits on-site stormwater quality treatment BMP devices within the individual single-family lots that are maintained by individual homeowners. Subdivisions are now required to install common stormwater treatment systems that are maintained by a Homeowners Association. As such, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 shall be required to form a Homeowners Association to maintain the required stormwater treatment system for the subdivision. Public Art: Tentative Maps are exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. The future development of the seven (7) single-family residences on the subject tentative map will be required to fulfill the public art requirement. Based on the number of future residential units, the total art value required per Section 17.124.020.C. is $5,250 (7 lots X $750 per Unit). Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on March 28, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts, or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Time Extension DRC2020-00120 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than 082 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120 - SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA April 22, 2020 Page 4 significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2020-00120. FISCAL IMPACT: The project proponent will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation, infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the parcels will be assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. Additionally, the development will be required to create a CFD and each property will be assessed for the maintenance of the infrastructure related to the tract and fair share of improvements. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to this application, the proposed tentative map time extension will further the City Council's 2019 goal of enhancing our premier community status by providing an opportunity for the future development of market-rate for-sale residences on the 4.89-acre infill parcel. With this time extension, the site retains the approved entitlement for the future development of 7 single-family dwelling units, consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Time Extension Request Letter Dated March 19, 2020 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Staff Report for Time Extension DRC2019-00048 dated March 13, 2019 (with exhibits) Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2020-00120 083 Tentative Tract Map 418210 Parcel Number: 0225-171-04-0-000 12765 Summit Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Owners of Record: As of Jan 01,2019 Mendiondo Childrens Trust No 16/16/10 C/O Suzanne Marie Etcheberria,Trustee 2044 Winston Court Upland, CA 91784 suzetch roadrunner.com March 19, 2020 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Tabe Vanderzwaag To Whom It May Concern: Please consider my request for a time extension for Tentative Tract Map#18210. 1 have had the property on the market for over two years,opened escrow three times, and the buyers have backed out. I am hopeful to get an interested buyer to buy the property and develop the land. Please consider my request for extension of the plot map for one year. Thank you. X4710'� v4tA44� Suzanne Etcheberria Manger of BCS Investments, LLC Exhibit A 084 STAFF REPORT DATE: March 13, 2019 TO: Chairman and Members of the Pll�anning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner + %Tli INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00048— SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA—A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 7 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18210) on 4.89 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; APN: 0225-171-04. On March 28, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: • Approve Time Extension DRC2019-00048 for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject 4.89-acre project site is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The project site is approximately 650 feet from north-to-south and approximately 330 feet from east-to-west. The project site slopes from approximately 1,540 feet above mean sea level at the north property line to approximately 1,512 feet at the south elevation, for a grade change of approximately 28 feet from the north to south property lines. There is an existing 15 foot wide private equestrian trail located along the east and south property lines. The project site has been regularly cleared of brush and is generally covered with short grasses. Curb, gutter and street lights have been installed along the Banyan Street frontage. The applicant will be responsible for installing the community trail improvements along the project street frontage. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Estate Residential (ER) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan South Single-Family TVery Low Very Low (VL) Residential District _ _ Residences ry Etiwanda Specific Plan Exhibit B 085 D1—Pg1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00048- SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA March 13, 2019 Page 2 East Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single-Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan On March 28, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, for the subdivision of 4.89 acres of land into 7 lots. Prior to that approval, the prosect was reviewed by the Grading, Technical, and Design Review Committees on January 16. 2007, and by the Trails Advisory Committee on March 14, 2007, Each Committee recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review and approval, ANALYSIS: A, Proiect Density: 1.43 dwelling units per acre (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre permitted). B, Prior Approvals and Automatic Time Extension: This time extension request is to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 for one (1) year. The original approval of SUBTT18210 was on March 28, 2007,for a time period of 3 years. The original expiration date was on March 28, 2010_ However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. The Planning Commission has also apprcved two separate one (1) year time extensions. The approval history and previous time extensions are as follows: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 Approval Approval Approving Authority Approval/Extension Tvpe Period Date Expiration Date Planning Commission Original Approval 3 Years 03/28/07 03/28/10 Senate Bill 1185 Automatic Time Extension 1 year 03/28/11 Assembly Bill 333 Automatic Time Extension 2 Years 03/28/13 Assembly Bill 208 Automatic Time Extension 2 Years 03/28/15 Assembly Bill AB) 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years 03/28/17 Planning Commission Time Extension 1 Year 02/22/17 03/28/18 DRC2017-00028 Planning Commission Time Extension 1 Year 03/14/18 03/28/19 DRC2018-00054 Planning Commission Time Extension 1 Year (Proposed) (Proposed) DRC2019-00048 03/13/18 03/28/20 086 D1—Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00048- SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA March 13, 2019 Page 3 C. Map Time Extension; Municipal Code Section 16.16.170 allows for up to five (5) one (1) year time extensions of the original 3-year approval period of an approved Tentative Map. The application to extend SUBTT18210 was submitted on January 28, 2019, and includes a letter outlining the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit A). The time extension is requested to provide the applicant time to sell the project site. D. Conformance with Development Code: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESN) and the Equestrian Overlay District. The required development standards and the provided lot statistics are as follows: Required Provided Lot Width 90 Feet 90 Feet Lot Depth 200 Feet 270—329 Feet Minimum Lot Area 20,000 SF 22,610—33,050 SF Average Lot Area 25,000 SF 25,524 SF E. Water Quality Management Plan: A new set of Conditions of Approval were added to the Resolution of Approval of Time Extension DRC2018-00054 that address the City's new requirement that prohibits on-site storm water quality treatment BMP devices within the individual single-family lots that are maintained by individual homeowners. Subdivisions are now required to install common storm water treatment systems that are maintained by a Home Owners Association. As such, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 shall be required to form a Home Owners Association for the purpose of maintaining the required storm water treatment system for the subdivision. F. Public Art: Tentative Maps are exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. The future development of the seven (7) single-family residences on the subject tentative map will be required to fulfill the public art requirement. Based on the number of future residential units, the total art value required per Section 17.124.020.C. is $5,250 (7 lots X $750 per Unit). G. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on March 28, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts, or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Time Extension DRC2019- 00048 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed 087 D1—Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00048- SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA March 13, 2019 Page 4 changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. To assure that no nesting birds have inhabited the project site since the original CEQA determination, staff has added a Condition of Approval to the Resolution of Approval requiring that the applicant submit a nesting bird survey 30 days prior to earth moving activity. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2019-00048. FISCAL IMPACT: The project proponent will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project_ The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services,transportation,infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services,police, parks, and community and recreation services_ The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the parcels will be assessed an annual property tax, A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. Additionally, the development will be required to create a CFD and each property will be assessed for maintenance of the infrastructure related to the tract and fair share of improvements. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to this application, the proposed tentative map time extension will further the City Council's 2018 goal of enhancing our premier community status by providing an opportunity for the future development of market rate for-sale residences on the 4.89-acre infill parcel. With this time extension, the site retains the approved entitlement for the future development of 7 single-family dwelling units, consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications, EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Time Extension Request Letter Dated January 21, 2019 Exhibit B - Planning Commission Staff Report for Time Extension DRC2018-00054 dated March 14, 2018 (with exhibits) Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2019-00048 088 D1—Pg4 Tentat,ve Tract Map 18210 Parcel Number: 0225-171-04-0-000 12765 Surnrni:Avenue Rancho Ctacarnonga,CA 91739 O%ners of Record. As of Jan 01, 201E Mendiondo Childrens Trust No 16/16 C/O Suzanne Marie Etcheberria,Trustee 2044 Winston Court Lapland,CA 91784 JZ@ [E"rt�nLadrun"i2r.C4rri January 21, 2019 City of rancho Cu.-nm3nge Planning Dep`.. 10500 Citric Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Tabe Vander Zwaag To Whom it May Concern: I am requesting a time extension for Tentative Tract iti,+lap No. 18210. Due to the las; recession and having had it on the market now almost two years, 1 am optimistic to get a buyer soon and to have the property developed. Please consider my request for extension of the plot map for one more year. Thank you. Suzanne Etcheberria Manager of BCS Investments, LLC EXHIBIT A 089 D1—Pg5 i { CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE' March 14, 2018 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett. City Planner ("� INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00054--SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA—A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 7 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18210) on 4.89 acres of land in the Very Low(VL) District(1- 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; APN: 0225-171-04. On March 28, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval: • Approve Time Extension DRC2018-00054 for a one (1) year Time Extension of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 BACKGROUND: On March 28, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, for the subdivision of a 4.89-acre parcel of land into 7 parcels. Prior to that approval, the project was reviewed by the Grading, Technical, and Design Review Committees on January 16, 2007 and by the Trails Advisory Committee on March 14, 2007. Each Committee recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The project site is surrounded by single-family development in the Very Low (VL) District to the south, east and west. The lots to the north of the project site (across Banyan Street) are undeveloped and zoned Estate Residential (ER).The project site generally slopes from north to south and has been regularly cleared of vegetation. A. Proiect Density- 1.43 dwelling units per acre (_1 to 2 dwelling units per acre permitted). EXHIBIT B D1—Pg6 090 PLANNING COMMISSION t %FF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00054 (TENTATIVE MAP SUBTT18210) SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA March 14, 2018 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) ESP North Vacant Land Very Low Estate Residential (ER) ESP South ISingle-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) ESP East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) ESP West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) ESP ANALYSIS: 1. Prior Approvals and Automatic Time Extension: This time extension request is to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 for one (1) year. The original approval of SUBTT18210 was on March 28, 2007, for a time period of 3 years. The original expiration date was on March 28, 2010. However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative maps throughout the State. State Bill (SB) 1185 extended the approval period 1-year to March 28, 2011; Assembly Bill (AB) 333 extended the approval period 2-years to March 28, 2013; Assembly Bill (AB) 208 extended the approval period 2-years to March 28, 2015; and,Assembly Bill (AB) 116 extended the approval period 2-years to March 28, 2017. The Planning Commission approved DRC2017-00028 on February 22, 2017, which extended the approval for 1-year to March 28, 2018. Tentative Tract Ma SUBTT18210 Approval 'j Approval Approving Authority Approval/Extension T e Period Date Expiration Date Planning Commission Original Approval 3 Years 03/28/07 03/28/10 Senate Bill 1185 Automatic Time Extension 1 ear 03/28/11 Assembly Bill 333 Automatic Time Extension 2 Years 03/28/13 Assembly Bill 208 Automatic Time Extension 2 Years 03/28/15 Assembly Bill AB 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years 03/28/17 1 Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2017-00922 1 Year 02/22/17 03/28/18 (Proposed) (Proposed) Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2018-00054 9 Year 03//4198 03128/19 2. Map Time Extension: Municipal Code Section 16.16.170 allows for up to five (5) one (1) year time extensions of the original 3-year approval period of an approved Tentative Map. The application to extend SUBTT18210 was submitted on January 16, 2018, and includes a letter outlining the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit C). The time extension is necessary to provide the applicant time to sell the project site. 3. Conformance with Development Code: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Very Low (VL} District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Development standards for the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan require a minimum lot width of 90 feet, a minimum lot depth of 200 091 D1—Pg7 PLANNING COMMISSION I %FF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00054 (TENTATIVE MAP SUBTT18210) SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA March 14, 2018 Page 3 feet. a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, and an average lot size of 25,000 square feet. Each lot exceeds these standards. 4. Water Quality Management Plan: A new set of Conditions of Approval are attached to the Resolution of Approval that address the City's new requirement that prohibits on-site storm water quality treatment BMP devices within the individual single-family lots that are maintained by individual homeowners. Subdivisions are now required to install common storm water treatment systems that are maintained by a Home Owners Association. As such, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 shall be required to form a Horne Owners Association for the purpose of maintaining the required storm water treatment system for the subdivision. 5. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on March 28, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless. (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Time Extension DRC2018-00054 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2018-00054. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site.To date, no correspondence has been received related to the project or the notifications. FISCAL IMPACT: The project proponent will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees.These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project.The types of services that these impact fees would support include library services, transportation, infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the parcels will be assessed an annual property tax, A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. 092 D1—Pg8 PLANNING COMMISSION AFF REPORT 0 TIME EXTENSION DRC2018-00054 (TENTATIVE MAP SUBTT18210) SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA March 14, 2018 Page 4 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the application, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code as the General Plan land use and zoning designations of the project site is Very Low Residential and Very Low (VL) District, respectively, and the subdivision is for residential purposes. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photograph Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 Exhibit C - Time Extension Request Letter Dated January 12, 2018 Exhibit D - Planning Commission Staff Report for Time Extension DRC2017-00028 dated February 22, 2017 (with exhibits) Exhibit E - Planning Commission Resolutions of Approval No. 17-13 for Time Extension DRC2017-00028 Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2018-00054 CB/TV/Is 093 D1—Pg9 fr Ec�u��tian'Cenier "` a Banyan 5 w BanyanfSt Bany nyan St S—y �; err, r ct Proje Ln Site -VVI 0 Me: Ail Yom] + ry,�' �" � � _ � r . i � _ r��:.r...a.. �zr.� 5 'l -•4� � s a. .r j,�/ r 91 F �{ IIs`.""^ I . . IL �A�Ww'r i � �, a•e �p�� �' ,�. ../— 5i �' f, A � h � I _ 1 i Y r yl f J?'��+y}�� � isareu�. .� s,� .�.• I a LOT elk AL ri Blue Gum Dr n �. . .' TENTATIVE TRACT N0,L18210 ( (vACAN11- ---- ----�--` `-- - --- stA7[ar tJsLlruuNu KI &AgAIImrg1 'WA"fI TIICFAS7r 04L0f?.IX:t Il cu_ _ AECC(S D$%ANrWO'.Ifj C(r.ArF i.[V WPS � � -` r �,I.r _ Y - SiREET�-.�•�- `- -- y--. ----------'---' s�ccws or swr eF.!wmA+a coul7r cx�crlXv. 1 - +�- -.r ANRRCISCN CN(+YF.ER+NLi,INI: .^.-�-��� ��.c�^'��i_ii� - �1-- + `�a :^-.r fl11HWR•TFlff7 ~ ^• IL r� lam►#'°i 'r L P �' - '- '-- OWNER/DEVELOPER: ENGINEER: !'" F •VS-. r t 4 •y---• -- J F SEN FNGINELH'NG.+r:L:. J' �1�1'� ti...{�"5`��y/. IA REAL ESLAIE INC. ALF'RA L�1!l ! FI t - ; -�i -� e}:!:ur.r,..x,....1�r r' ,d.�.r.n r:.,, uuRr�r:t's•s 1 ar.lw.s.w.r.nr+(. =ref} L 1 i r 1•'�e renis , L ..O! - wuw v ower m« - r y i 1 1 jet 1` 1 1 NOTES: 1 �= -� 1/•'�� f�i i Y.L.R./S.F.R.1 ' y .iss+•r.r.Rcn r. .:?::tle,. unLTnEs CONTACTS: '� `\ 1•- .fl155 SrJ r r - I ! 1 _, rid •u•w•h.cn 4'"k:+.va'x nN•CfY:.r..f rf r ..r,.... .,, 1 1, J 1 1 'Aw.Ile.+nhUt+,(r I ,. • '��iCCC..r 1 TENTATIVE-PARCEL MAP SUMMARY: �.ae nuwrA cr.yr nrn 1 �- �� �,�'/--• . ' e% � I 1 1 r�.....w'a nsXls:r�..,u.r.0 n.l.r_r>.1 f i r�.. , ��• ._, 2r ��'� I �� __ -� 1 � :7'...:7..;,f,o•.rr r1...1r.r:.r:.:,: s.,L•:• mrXo+w.w / -� !.S'K::waJ. •1:lr Atia;\I nr•rA:A Y•rllfl 1 i 1 I J 21.7]5 S1 / j _- �- r I 1 ( �•.-••�--- .a-.()'A:;rrrf .IHa.,V.i •wrl ww _ ASPFN MCA1]OW }•r-:I,� www a.Yrr 4S tirR �+.+� •aroslu,••..0 .ts a..r.. �u v'"ILM . ---- i a � - _ r �� _ .. _ tws ra.•t.•• .:,....'.srrvt r-.•. l /'-t✓ - J - - a I�. -1 1._ L- •• I -.-- C O U R I BENCHMARK' I.AI i•w Tinr / - I _ Y.LR i r.N�-_ _r r - A^ 1•.L R./S r R. S •�, � ...--- v.•.. �...-... 1 �"_ s.,rr....m...•�.n-r• :am `_�_ --�•3 '" •' ." r L--'----"---'r.tri a r .1•.:.w.1...... .r..r:.l :alt n:n ar:..urs o Jlwmwna+o.®LnaPwa =r..1. •- ri�� Y.1:I.e7o sl. y " _ - V I f 1UNIN IEAXA r.11L7meosaaflswrA'alnh -.r . e�\ �"•-- � / CC I� I Ml:A6rtl&7SA7NL BASIS of BEARING 1.I W V�4PI _�-�--_�"Z- � •-.•.r-•' „nr -..� • � NIEAI„0O r�I1RKIT FARNIIQX,ASN®iW � ! �[ I Il I �{F PWrrMAIIlfaQ11WL1ANrLgRfTVOrMr� ��°°°�"':r°r"r•�n• v J/-J •d'- -� _ _ !.�_ ______L-_ Y ) 1 •'• I�,IIL tILY1711WOr0A7M WAfle�10Ir6 n�S.rr.:rX wrrltr«1v EASEMENTS- U3 L R / ..1 ,C,r^!.?•-� r I - 1 i I I I .nLawnumentocwe+atewlanrvra Sn S.F R. CO) •c.L»m1A=.n,o..Lr7Lr.«aaLxuwr.a � -� - r. r + _..--'—•--- I o I .�� --I' I1afXOlAMIIa� ---- - o-,lope=/trATXP,USL.1F7A10AB/+O� KNOUL ------ V_ Y ~- v r ��' -J______ 1 Q t ( • 1 '--��"-J`•I--I ©.b.MOLAp.M IONQNPI4CIOOGYO! " ---..-�_-�- d { " -'� ! 31, LEGEND: ^ BANYAN STREET r1.+1 r •..r..;;S.ii... 1 I .t,......r. V,L R./S.F R.�.yt S •,/ ` -- •• "�.- ' _ 1_�'« � V,l FJ. 5 T A_ i I crAA.c IqW,t•-nom n wr ------------ _ - /+/, - 17.t:7o'Sr �� J , I -'` I w , I 4 5 ..._. UL K (VAC.W.) sr. ' •. I I �- -'_._ ,. ---'-�=J •=C.1J - V.L.R./S.F.R. I J 1 STILL CREEK �Nr~1- �1•r-s�•�r. y- ' ` - I F,R. A�S•�TEET —r-- rvrr:r..•1,.... . _-- _- � / F37,�S03� �...'r"� �- I f 1 + I �T //'-�•--- aw>- 1,_:'..,i.Nca,... L---- 1 ( { I A�- .r•I vi.1'..I r... -•---r..-.�.- �..._ .. .... __ -\.-_J d=l�.11��r �y�-Tyl I 14-�11E '�"__.W- Ir1'..r..1.wia ....r. •t-Tr-(-r�-T r` ��rl"1 (•A _ I � F.-.._S- .:+:NC•Anl. 1 1 F/:GIId EN v L R./s.r R ) k r 13 eNARF.n tiEv F.'NCIYFElt1XG, JNL: 1 I Y.L.A./S.F.R ,- V L R SFR 1 I - -- - I VICINITY« MAP -�— - ��- BCS Investments, LLC Suzanne Etcheberria, Manager 2044 Winston Court Upland, CA 91784 (909) 618-8043 suzetch@roadrunner.com January 12, 2018 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: 12765 Summit Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Assessor's Parcel#0225-171-04-0-000 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that I am asking for a time extension on the above property. It is a vacant lot for development. It has been on the market since lune of last year. As the economy has gotten better, development for the property is now more optimistic. Please consider my request for extension of the plot map for one year. Thank you. Sincerely, 444,4,4� Suzanne Etcheberria Manager of BCS Investments, LLC � C 3 /1g117 EXHIBIT C 096 Dl—Pg12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: February 22, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the PI ning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00028 -ANDREASEN ENGINEERING, INC. - A request to allow for a one(1) year time extension of a previously approved 7 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18210)on 4.89 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District(1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; APN: 0225-171-04. On March 28, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a one(1)year Time Extension DRC2017- 00028 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BACKGROUND: On March 28, 2007, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 for the subdivision of a 4.89 acre parcel of land into 7 parcels. Prior to Planning Commission approval, the Grading, Technical, and Design Review Committees reviewed and recommended approval of the project on January 16, 2007. Additionally, the Trails Advisory Committee reviewed and recommended approval of the project on March 14, 2007. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The project is surrounded by Very Low (VL) single- family residential development to the south,east and west. The lots to the north of the site(across Banyan Street) are undeveloped and zoned Estate Residential (ER). The site slopes from north to south and has two short sections of Eucalyptus windrows that run from east to west. A. Project Density: 1.43 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Vacant Land; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Estate Residential (ER) District (.1-1 dwelling unit per acre) South - Single-Family Residential; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Very Low(VL) District{.1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Residential; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Very Low(VL) District(.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-Family Residential; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Very Low(VL) District{.1-2 pc_ 3 f f J (� dwelling units per acre) J J EXHIBIT D D1—Pg13 097 PLANNING COMMISSION 'AFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00028 —ANDREASEN ENGINNERING, INC. February 22, 2017 Page 3 C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential(.1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Very Low Residential (_1-2 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (_1-2 dwelling units per acre) ANALYSIS: A. Prior Approvals and Automatic Extensions: This time extension application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 for 1 year. The original approval of SUBTT18210 was on March 28, 2007 for a time period of 3 years. The original expiration date was on March 28, 2010. However, subsequent to approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, the State Legislature passed a series of Assembly/Senate Bills automatically extending the approval period of various active tentative reaps throughout the State. State Bill (SB) 1185 extended the approval period 1-year to March 28, 2011; Assembly Bill(AB) 333 extended the approval period 2-years to March 28, 2013; Assembly Bill (AB) 208 extended the approval period 2-years to March 28, 2015; and, Assembly Bill (AB) 116 extended the approval period 2-years to March 28, 2017. _ Tentative Tract Map 18210 Approval ApprovalExpiration A rovin Authorit A roval/Extension Type Period Date I Date Planning Commission Original Approval 3 Years 3128107 3128110 Senate Bill 1185 Automatic Extension 1 Year 3128111 Assembly Bill 333 Automatic Extension 2 Years 3128113 Assembly Bill 208 Automatic Extension 2 Years 3128115 Assembly Bill 116 Automatic Extension 2 Years 3128117 -Planning Commission Time Extension DRC2017-00028 1 Year 3128118 B. Map Extension: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regulates the subdivision of land through Title 16, the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Section 16.16 is applicable specifically to Tentative Maps — Five or More Parcels -- and provides for time extension requests through Section 16.16.170 Extensions. Section 16.16.170.A. states "The subdivider or his representative may request an extension of the expiration date of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map by written application to the community development department. The application shall be filed not less than 60 days prior to the expiration date and shall state the reasons for requesting the extension." The application to extend SUBTT18210 was submitted on January 9, 2017 and includes a letter stating the reasons for requesting the extension (Exhibit B). C. Conformance with Etiwanda Specific Plan:Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Very Low (VL) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Development standards for the Very Low (VL) District require a minimum lot width of 90 feet, a minimum lot depth of 200 feet, a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, and an average lot size of 25,000 square feet. Each parcel will exceed all applicable standards. 098 D1—Pg14 PLANNING COMMISSION d 'IFF REPORT I TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00028—ANDREASEN ENGINNERING, INC. February 22, 2017 Page 3 D. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on March 28, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts; or(iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or (iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. Staff has evaluated Time Extension DRC2017- 00028 and concludes that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The application is for a one (1)year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. Therefore, pursuant to CEQA, staff recommends that the Planning Commission concur with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required in connection with the City's consideration of Time Extension DRC2017-00028. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. CBTVIIs EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Exhibit B - Applicant Letter dated January 17, 2017 Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 28, 2007 Exhibit D - Planning Commission Resolution of Approval No. 07-12 for SUBTT18210 Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2017-00028 099 D1-0g15 lll_�*4 yR� syr _". ��.R''`' �• F 16; .rYA •f:}�� 4 ��. � '� =�~ 1, ,1 _ � � � trr4 i Y � I '+ - - _ -a- WY. t}ti1.7, '�' R • mak 2- ` A�- - � � 4 °•�.E��sl �s�sSnli,tl,r'7�` A - ;� �+ 4�, 1 _ 7•IF1 L+ -r 17 T4 "rf• _ s } .gym -•rt•�; WIN '.• ;. J h'" •I'LL 'a ly F I s drib 1A ,.. I f � I VW }ri } 'S Jlu vp ti.� 7y7 E * of 1 h i f , D9cZ0r7- BCS Investments, LLC SLIZillifle litcheliel'l'lzl,Mill"Idg - 2014 Winston COMA Upland,CA 91704 (909) 6'18-80,13 Suzctcli((�t-oadeu nriei:com JANUARY 17,2017 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91730 RE: 12765 Summit Avenue,Rancho Cucamonga,CA 91739 Assessor's Parcel# 0225-171-04 Tu Wholli It May Concern, I mn asking for a tilne LALension oil the above property. The Property hwi noL been developed because of tlee recession.As the economy has now gotten better,plans Far development of the property are now more optimisLic. Please(.(insider my 1"eeluest 101-extension of the,plot Inap for Dile yu,11'. ,thank you, Sincerely. Suzanne L'tcheberrio Mandger of 13CS lnvewtments. LLC -Pc- 3 �- f . 7 EXHIBIT B 101 D1-Pg17 T 11 f [' [ T Z' O 1. R 1 \ C110 CL C 1 M 0 GA Staff Report DATE: March 28, 2007 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: James R_Troyer, AICP, Planning Director BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Assistant Planner SUBJECT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18210 - MARK ALLISON - A request to subdivide 4.89 acres of land into 7 lots for the purpose of developing single-family homes in the Very Low Residential district (.t-2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Etiwanda Avenue - APN: 0225-171-04. Related File: DRC2008-00735. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION.- A. ESCRIPTION:A. Project Density: 1.43 dwelling units per acre. B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning, North - Vacant Land; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Estate Residential (.1-1 dwelling unit per acre) South Single-Family Residentiail; Etiwanda Specific Plafi, Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Single-Family Residential; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Single-Family Residential; Etiwanda Specific Plan, Very Low Residential (A-2 dwelling units per acre) C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) North - Estate Residential (_7-1 dwelling units per acre) South - Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) East - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) West - Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) D_ Site Characteristics: The subject property is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The project is surrounded by single-family residential development to the south, east, and west- The lots to the north of the site (across Banyan Street) are undeveloped and zoned single-family residential; the applicant has created a Conceptual Master Pian for the future development of these lots (Exhibit D). 1 2- 7 EXHIBIT C 102 D1—Pg18 PLANNING COMMISS J STAFF REPORT C TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18210— MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 2 The site slopes from north to south and has two short sections of Eucalyptus windrows that run from east to west. ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide 4.89 acres of land into 7 lots for the purpose of developing one single-family residence per lot. Access to the lots will be from a new cul-de-sac off Banyan Street. The project includes the development of a local feeder equestrian trail at the rear of each lot and a Community Trail across the frontage of Lot 1 along Banyan Street. The proposed lots meet all City requirements including width, depth, and size. The average lot size is 25,524 square feet which exceeds the 25,000 square foot average required in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed lot sizes are as follows: Lot 1 26,155 square feet Lot 2 24,735 square feet Lot 3 24,830 square feet Lot 4 24,670 square feet Lot 5 22,620 square feet Lot 6 22,610 square feet Lot 7 33,050 square feet Average Lot Size 25,524 square feet B. Design Review Committee: On January 16, 2006, the Design Review Committee (McPhail, Stewart, Diaz) reviewed the project and recommended approval as presented, (Exhibit F). C. Technical Review and Grading Committees: The Technical and Grading Committees reviewed the project and recommended approval subject to the conditions outlined in the attached Resolution of Approval with conditions. D. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was held on February, 15, 2007, at the Golden Elementary School. A total of five residents attended and were generally in favor of the project. One neighbor raised concerns regarding the potential for blowing dust during the grading of the site. The applicant assured them that he would have water trucks on site to minimize blowing dust to meet the strict Air Quality Management District requirements. The attendees were also interest in whether the applicant would develop the lots or sell them off. The applicant stated that he would be developing the lots with Mediterranean style houses of similar size to the surrounding neighborhood. The remainder of the meeting consisted of residents asking the project planner general questions regarding the use and maintenance of private equestrian trails and the landscaping along the public-right-of-way on Banyan Street. E. Trails Advisory Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project at their meeting on March 14, 2007. They were generally accepting of the project and asked that the Commissioners consider asking the developer to use concrete instead of cobblestones on the public right-of-way along the east side of the proposed cul-de-sac. 103 D1—Pg19 PLANNING COMMIS J STAFF REPORT { TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18210 —MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 3 F_ 'Free Removal Permit DRC2006-00765: The applicant is requesting the removal of two remnant Eucalyptus windrows consisting of 46 tfees. The trees are planted in two rows, each running along an east to west axis. One row is located along the north property line of the site and the other row is more or less in the center of the site. An arborist report was prepared for the site (Jose Huezo, August 31, 2006) which concluded that the trees were in poor health and infested with Borer beetles. The study concluded that because of the poor health of the trees, their location, and the slope of the land, most of the trees will need to be removed for the development of the site. To meet replacement requirements, conditions of approval require all Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal to be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculata (Spotted Gum) trees, 8 feet on center,as required by the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. G. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to air quality, biological resources, geology and soils, hydrology and water quality and noise, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. RECOMMENDATION' Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00735 through adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. Respectfully submit# d, Jam R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director JT:TVIge Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit C - Tentative Parcel Map Exhibit D - Conceptual Master Plan Exhibit E - Horse Corral Exhibit Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action Agenda dated January 16,2007 Exhibit G - Initial Study I and II Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTT18210 104 D1—Pg20 m -------------------- I VACANT v ' SIDENM VLAUST a REMoo< I rueUK SNOB rAUMT Hoop SIR=FAMILY Noun I ja I , F I 14 II I STREET • _ �- "..fir".'- @�"- •I ' 1 0 W 1F ASPEN rACAoaws I s I COURT �u�ll.c\r�u.r•w s ! I I MV06MLL YL � \ InoofIIAE YE ' , S31ME 3 SINOIL FAULT MOM O� . FAULY HOPES u ! n F ATM I 1 - 5 11 L.�_C tE`er sAUO[[HURti I• T ' COURT �~I ONIYE I N ! of I . d I• ••• i W I NMT A N REST VL � I - } 1lIAL Silo= Y NOMES o m W 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANiONC. 6 WIJ J I �y a I I SITE UTILIZATION MAP a k'-J FOR _--__ --- _— --- f TCNTATIVF TRACT MAF'NU 18210 S SUBTT 18290 Yul Wuo M f.. I ry�tK �r •rn ; \ c "I'ily347•� {,- zi.A LEGEND: L tea' •1:�1_���:a-�^ r I ,�� I �:`--_� I . f�� ' � 1�•4 �. I r - I L•--5 C: zc1s, 1f .� BIS ASPEN 1.11 ADOlY 3 ��� `1 L014' .� -.__-----_- _- 1 �� ♦ _,�- sub �� � �•�..�. "—....._w 1 • ' --' L � M j. .-^. —� SECTIO -D-D' 4�I.L11 f—`- -......,..-.Y--�� �' `�'f S�"� ;1�-- •----�s_? Y I �jl�n�i --•.Y-___��r"—„ J i - { .-. ih^`'J I` l f/J r - I '�1!/ry11•1 I f.. _ ", I I -^ r L .h • .i. � � � a � fA...—.-�1��-�' j�• 777 1 �i+ ]�� `,; -'+r • � Jxx I _ ' ' -�� 1} rtil {$ ��1 —..— .` - � 1 �` :•'�I i ' vl...,.." t'"�*�v�..�—F�.�:.zc�- Il.wv �� - Irh 1� 1, l��F " w., si rll�•.fr � rte . ..1,,.,,ti -_ S �e.rlo 5r +! 'll� SECTION'A-A' SECTION-B•B- -------------- -, 1 -- '..v IJ•_ I a ' i •may I —,-— ., I " NACA.YTl ✓ �+ T 111����,I� �J1�i •-i :,0 r-� 1 ` stlLi C14CFll - h •{�. � V�i sl � i. i V i1'�i � i z_1 I �-. .�[YVNt- '— ' + } 1i+ "... 11U I 3 I { tit' I SECT3ON'[•c- `y/�' a-= ----s•.- a+_�..._:.;'„_� I { CITY OF RANCHO CLJCAMONGA 41 �,-.� _14 - _ [W •r ii —t—� �. �Y A'.i I a I-- CONCEPTUAL.GRADING ..1 faa PLAN J 1 W.R. 231 / G9 h% � I I { :”,' TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.18211 I i [SU1ITT 113210 1 9 } I I --------� DETAIL.A. ��.nets=w=.,`t�txrlti ..ice., - '— �,•- 1--.� m X TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 18210 E IF Cr it W TIM,CITY Of �F" CIIUCIK;A%!0W!A.C4'Ap.FY OF SA!J III A%AsjIXIj CuIf0r4-;IA STREET o'. N-1 OWNER I DEVELOPER. ENGINEER: TANNA�EAL f'JAIft INC TZ1, 10,014fA5(I .,:(' NOTES: VA.R./s r.R.: UTILMES CONTACTS: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUMMARY- t—um J 'IVA 11I.kilXW1 1- sp > It AS P t:it v L.0/-, -- BENCHMARK- -3 u Kim f BASIS OF BEARING, J4 wa sl Lor EASEMENTS- V.L It/S.F.R. �A 7?"?o sl LEGEND: BANYAN w STREET V L HJS F N ----------------- ----------- I -,V.L,R,/;.f.R STILL CREEK (VAC,143) 4 'o' V.L.R./ST.R. C01YRT "A'STREET -zi2— V.L R./SFR. /s It C) V,R it VLI?/%rw i I -4 VICINITY MAP rn sow 1 I ❑ ' I r( I , ys r' RES10p1r[IIILY 1 ScHom ( F C(40AW ir.AV0)I F� RCSIprM11AL ri 11 25.=Lr.sva) 5FHEEF `1 4�0 A. s. I I I Pff=f = i ! a • C O U R f' awnrc ILA, r+w' N a - ` RIsaFN1uE n I#t i NEWO( E n MI 7MLEc rAwlEr I , SIHac I SIN=rAYIEY mmn a' - J ►Ally Homm I W { li 41 f couRl OEC ly DR �f oRlvc - -�- - VL tI � IWIND FAH F I� I SSN01L r v Nowa 0 3' �mila"`a a i�~arf I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONCf CONCEPT MASTER PLAN FOR f TEtuTl4YIVl,MAL 1A1l1i'I.4] I!:.,I ' (SUBTT 90210 1 rn >t� nrQs L _ - grx>< LAMPS {1 f f+V{tNPt� M13 4 -_--_-- -- \ ^FSTREET ��- 61 r z+M sl b hS_f•fN MEADOW 40 n#74.a SIA cuuur 3 v ----� f 1 ' •'/� S=:';!tb5°iL^: � - ---' - "'�•. ��Y�r—Y------I I I 111 um LEGEND: �.�ZZ M : �' i ' r .��1 1� �' .f— i ; 1 k I I wnc ralr r•v � . tL U 1170 11 =� i -jil 7 ------ r � 1 i `- 40 - I u sru.t c1414a 1'--�—�-- CUIINi Cr7Y OF RANCHO CLICAMONG, n! 4p2- 1 I 4Y _..�` _L_n.:_r E 1 45 I I R. 234 / 50-6/ — I I SME PIAN I k f f SUBrr 18210) DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:10 p.m. Tabe Van der Zwaag January 16, 2007 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18210 — MARK ALLISON - A request to subdivide 4.76 acres of land into 7 lots for the purpose of developing single-family homes in the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre), located on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Etiwanda Avenue -APN: 0225-171-04. Design Parameters: The project site is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area. The parcel is generally rectangular in shape with an overall depth of about 630 feet from north to south and a width of 330 feet from east to west. The lots to the east, west, and south are zoned Very Low Residential and developed with single-family residences. The lots to the north are zoned Estate Residential and are undeveloped. The existing topography slopes from about 1,545 feet at the north property line to about 1,512 feet at the south property line. The applicant proposes subdividing the site into 7 lots for future development of one single-family residence per lot. The parcels will be accessed from a new cul-de-sac off of Banyan Street. The proposed lot sizes are as follows: Lot 1 - 26,155 square feet, Lot 2 - 24,735 square feet, Lot 3-24,830 square feet, Lot 4 - 24,670 square feet, Lot 5 - 25,620 square feet, Lot 6 - 22,610 square feet, and Lot 7 - 33,050 square feet. A private "local feeder' equestrian trail will be developed at the rear of each lot to access the Community Trail that runs along the south side of Banyan Street. The development of the lots will require the removal of two short sections of Eucalyptus windrows. The applicant will be required to plant new Eucalyptus trees along the north, south, and west property lines of the site in a windrow configuration per Etiwanda Specific Plan standards. The proposed tract map and the parcels created by it comply with all City development standards for the district in which it is located. Major Issues: None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. Plant the street trees within the parkway along the east side of Street A. 2. Provide slope planting per the Development Code standards. 3. Provide 10-foot wide gates in the block wall at the rear of each lot for access to the equestrian trail. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Committee recommend approval of the proposed parcel map as submitted to the Planning Commission. Design Review Committee Action: Members Present: McPhail, Stewart, Diaz Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag The Committee approved the project as presented. /-2c .3/09/07 EXHIBIT F 110 D1—Pg26 0 .NVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) City of Rancho Cucamonga (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to stove from one fine to the next line.) Planning Division (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuantto City Policies,Ordinances,and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. GENERAL O. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOTBE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: Project title: Banyan Street Prdect, Tract# 18210 Name&Address of project owner(s): Corey Patick 1 Tanna Real Estate, Inc. 152 South Glendora Avenue West Covina, California 91790 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor. Mark Allison 152 South Glendora Avenue West Covina, California 91790 Contact Person&Address: Mark Allison Cell- 626.841.1104 152 South Glendora Avenue Tei; 626.917.6700 West Covina, California 91790 Fax- 626.917.6706 Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above)-- Mark bove):Mark Allison Cell: 626.841.1104 152 South Glendora Avenue Tel: 626.917.6700 West Covina, California 91790 Fax: 626.917.6706 EXHIBIT G 111 D1—Pg27 PROJECT f ' ■ • 1 Information indicated by an asterisk(")is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. '1) Provide a full scale(8-112 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s)which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south,east and west; views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site_ Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe)., The proposed entrance to the property and to the cenerline of the proposed cul-de-sac.is 330 feet west of Laurell Blosom and 510 feet east of Greenwood Place, going south off of Banyan Street. 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): APN: 0225-171-04 See attached for legal description. 'S, Gross Site Area(adsq. ft.): square feet. 6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed dedications)_ 4,10 acres. li'+q 6-fo3quare feet. 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): None 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully Implement the project: Requesting a tetntabve only at this time, permit list will be determined once scope of project is complete. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography,soil stability,plants and animals,mature trees, traits and roads,drainage courses, and scenic aspects_ Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition,cite all sources of information(i.e., geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): 'topography: Medium sloping (50l0,approx.36')from northern border @ Banyan St(1,544'msl)to southern border of property{1,508'msf). Soils stability and composition:See attached Geotechnical Report RC Envircnm Form Banyan Page 2 of 9 Created on 4WO06 4 39 00 PM 112 D1—Pg28 Vegitation: Two rows of C ire Eukalyptus trees running east to west; first @ the north boundary on Banyan, the second is 350'to the south of the Banyan Street border. Trails, roads, creeks, drainage courses: None aparent_ Scenic aspects, The property is nestled comfortably in the foothills with enough elevation to have a view of the valley below with additional views of the San Gabriel mountains directly to the north. 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site_ Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): None known, Public records and internet search 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft roadway noise, etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: This project site is exposed to minimal disturbance from aircraft traffic leaving and departinq Ontario Airport to the S1SW 6.5 miles and what would be considered not more than average automobile traffic traveling east and west along Banyan Street directly to the north. The projects immediate boundries to the west, south and east are neffiboring residential communities zoned VL, 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary.- See ecessary:See accompanying site plan. Project timelines and phases of development have not yet been determined. RC Environrn Form Banyan Page 3 of 9 Created on 402006 4:39:00 PM 113 D1—Pg29 / / / 13) Describe the surrounding properties,including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects, Indicate the type of land use(residential, commercial, etc.),intensity of land use(one-family, apartment houses, shops,department stores,etc.)and scale of development(height,frontage,setback, near yard etc.) To the north,across Banyan,are 3 undeveloped parces totalling 17 acres_To the east and south is a 75 home community, all 1/2 acre lots +/-),zoned Residetial, VL_ Directly to the west are 4 new,recent constructed homes and one vacant lot lot on .8 acres,zoned Residential,VL. 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern,scale or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No, the project being proposed is within the standards and guidelines of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Regulatory Provisions 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses. What methods of soundproofing ane proposed? As of 8131106, a current Noise Analysis is being conducted and the complete report will follow. 'ib) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees, Depending on the approved lay-out and placement of homes, there are 4-f mature Eucalyptus trees that will need to be removed Additionally, the removal of 5-8 dead and/or unhealthy trees will also be required. See complete Arborist Report_ (Attached) - - 17i Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains; NIA RC Environm Form Banyan Page 4 of 9 Created on 4/6/2006 4:39.00 PM 114 D1—Pg30 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gaMday) j?gg:q:O::4qQ- Peak use(gabDay) j..�t) _ 2��• b. CommerciaOnd_ (gat/day/ac) 0.00 Peak use(gallmin/ac) 0.00 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal_ ❑ Septic Tank ® Sewer- If ewerIf septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga County Water District at 987-2591. a. Residential(gaUday) 270.00 b. Commerciat4ndustrial(gailday/ac) 0.00 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20) !Number of residential units. 7 Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Minimum lot size: 22,070 sf. Maximum lot size: 33.145 sf. Average lot size: 25,092 sf. Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): NIA 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents. Sale Prices) $0.00 to $0.00 Rent(permonth) $0.00 to $0.00 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: NIA 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: NIA RC Environm Form Banyan Page 5 of 9 Created on 416r1006 4;39:00 PM 115 D1—Pg31 24) Indicate the expected num!_ of school children who will be residing within tk roject. Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment 8: a. Elementary: b. Junior High: .. Senior High COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and majorfunction(s)of commercial,industrial or institutional uses: NIA 26) Total Boor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: NIA 27) Indicate hours of operation. NIA 28) Number of employees: Total_ Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated jab classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification(attach additional sheet if necessary): NIA 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: '31) For commercial and industrial uses only,indicate the source,type and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818)572-6283)_ NIA RC Environm Form Banyan Page 6 of 9 Created on 4!62006 4.39:00 PM 116 D1—Pg32 ALL PROJECTS M1 32) Have the water, sewer, fire, and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. No formal requests have been submitted though initial inquiries have determined the following. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection: No a arent issues with location, equipment or personnel requirements. Cucamonga Valley Water District:Viable pathways are aparent to existing storm drain and sewer locations. San Bernardino County Flood Control Qistrict: No reply since initial request. 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCB's;radioactive substances; pesticides and herbicides;fuels, oils, solvents, and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. None known 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above? If yes,provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented an-true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information maybe required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: 8/31106 Signature: Title: Vice President, Building Development RC Env.ronm Form Banyan Page 7 of 9 Created on 4!6/2006 4 39:00 PM 117 DZ—Pg33 ATTACHMENT A Water Usage Average use per day Residential , L Single Family �j� -b-60--g—allday 6 Apt/Condo 400 gal/day Commercialllndustrial General and Regional Commerclal 3,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,500 galldaylac General Industrial 2.500 galldaylac Industrial Park 3,000 galldaylac Peak Usage For all uses Average use x 2.0 Sewer Flows Residential Single Family 270 gal/day Apt/Condos 200 gallday Commercial/industrial General Commerciai 2,000 gal/day/ac Neighborhood Commercial 1,000 galldaylac General lndustrial 1,500 galldaylac Heavy Industrial 3,000 gal/day/ac Source-Cucamonga County Water District Master PJan, 6100 RC Environm Form Banyan Page 8 of 9 Created on 4/612006 4 39 00 PM 118 D 1--Pg34 A l l AU IMtrV 1 M Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees.- Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 987-8942 Etiwanda 5959 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909) 899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909) 988-8511 RC Environm Form Banyan Page 9 of 9 Created on 41612006 4,3900 PM 119 D1—Pg35 T H E C I T Y O F RANCHO CUCAMONGA Memorandum DATE August 13, 1990 -gyp: Applicants FROM: Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SUBJECT. HAZARDOUS WASTE AND SUBSTANCE SITES Effective July 1, 1987, Government Code Section 65962.5 requires each applicant for any development project to consult the State list of Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites. Based upon this list (available from the Planning Division) the applicant is required to submit a signed statement to the City of Rancho Cucamonga indicating whether the project is located on a site which is included on the list before the City accepts the application as complete. If the project is listed by the State as a hazardous waste or substance site, the applicant must fully describe the nature of the hazard and the potential environmental impacts on the Initial Study, Part 1. Attached is a standard statement for the applicant to sign. The State list of Hazardous Waste and Substance Sites may be reviewed at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division offices, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Attachment: Statement Form DC:dc 120 D1-Pg36 HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE STATEMENT I have been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga of my responsibilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5 (copy attached) to notify the City as to whether the site for which a development application has been submitted is located within an area which has been designated as the location of a hazardous waste site by the Office of Planning and Research, State of California (OPR). I have also been informed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga that, as of the date of executing this Statement OPR has not yet compiled and distributed a list of hazardous waste site as required by said Section 65962.5. 1 am informed and believe that the proposed site for which a development application has been submitted is not within any area specified in said Section 65962.5 as a hazardous waste site. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Califomia that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: a1yl?-60(0 ef Applicant 121 D1-Pg37 r l r' I r I _j `� .— IrllE 1 �'' �� •\N 1600 w 1\ 79 ffcY J 1E' I� x ,1«tfulfegu� ll1 l\\ I[IE� e_ � �1•�`� I�y� 480froM11 Pit ��T'/`11, :::.`•••F:...• ::i:i:: i.::°�.:.•4•T �.�� `may= a= ��---� :t:=a::���a�a • ., rw�-•,. °•..ar•• ' •t ��"i7` �—� 1� lA •>•=• SOC y` aa:i.•• • l" •••,r,••4 ... ., 600 HEM i •.•,wr •p•a,•.��#:::•° w I •� ?. i ° '1� *•"mow - �lE II w.iy�i.:::; •ira.• •••i�:::�i:i�: •ra �t Ave 1 1 •�rr••a°aa°ar•a• 25— % •1 ""�,' ES - ilr i°.r�::°°..• •••:•w•rl.•r•.q•war. •• Ili f-...s. ...�..�. r, _ �. ,\.-`s-a-auss" IF'. _ dr � ... :::•. .. •r;;•r'• �■'rie' It 3778 ''•�`4' !Ei II Is.'if,S•riew . /S]�► . �rvai •war �_�" L n � � ° aw IE: Ii•rfY•rr r•a• w ••a•- �.•°::•i:�.••• .••ar. . �'aH•".3 II ,iso ...•• •••w� ••••.r••r••q• .ar r Y ••• -1 �1 hi '1 • w •.a,•.•r,•.•a a•••,.as•• ° :.• U ,�r 1 7 /• 1600 , Y r•.• . ............. .. ••. a•• 3 Y li` •••• ••..a..w II •.'r ='IIr ° ■'. ;\ I!f I � li•!II :::: �:..•• •a..,......a,a.0 �.•aar•.r,• 0 Y • Y• l4 lEi I '�� ::�:. •w' •• .ra a••u ::•r.uaa• ;ar.•a•a•.• 1! J n oi t t �' i ::sawar• •w ..r•r•. +ham a•r• •• / MF 31• Iii titll •ri:: , 4 �:••...• •••.•r••r..•aa{ V��_•~r:ii��° I! 111 ••••rrr..r.r•r•r.. n s - W u 1 r •ar ay ar a..••a•.•p 01 Z`" "-- •° � N :(' ■ •' II •=+r li:@ F �! •rr..aa.,.•••aa.°• II 1 .� e L u + Oil ■ '� �•r•ra•w••��r.aa• • r ;i - t=. : w II � �� a.•.a►uar a•ua• w:.r•w.r• H Q I ••.•.....r.aa• as:i41 a:aa••a•rw• pJl� E I •••rr•wa •ar•••■•aa. _ N r.•aa..aa•• 11 �«� 1!E !I a Ir _ FI# � Y i r I ., r•• • •ra••ar�:a�::�:� •aa• °r•ar iY: i ' E II !tk 1 i i ... • ...............•°■... ....::..... ' 30 u!I' ( II Ga Ing .. „I f ' it'll, f 1 ii *• _ :!§: 5lg ion ' r ■s........... ..� '.i!!:: k E-�tlIlllt..it I e Ix 4az =lI r '� ::•..............: •a •°a• a�•�:�.. .; II a W. j1�±lFI�li.�.•I� 'ill r ti31�1�''. 11 a ...........:Ikfi�p! -�h11 ...:.::.a.•�' . on •��rs��a.s......:�... �' } P.- ............. .. .... .. • 't FIB CoAtrol 5tati .. •.••r�. .i�: U •t ..•r:.: it N•j;' .nu urrrl 'i EE11 � ?1� i.� a �.. I�s ,�a �..°..of:::.i: i! ' .... V. iI1EtEl� I..••a• •••••• :z I+Ir r•y •..::::re111k1..••...i'1 wa,•. _ it 1111 .•:�::• .. �....� . .... .; ,i�rl'tl ±rF j IJ I i'=f5 ' !' ...... I�I �....,..• .:i..;1:r..., .,.•..!`' ilii II IF ✓1 !� i� J , II .1 I i� 1 I it RLP r.r .,�If ::. �.�:�::•»::...r. • • •a.�, a.r.a--• .. i' i �I,I 'r 11 r i Ii+ I �� i r'' — ..�,'�:....•a,� H � :l,•i:•:.:i.r• �!11 �•t:".�1� �I !ii1 !�E { r i'li I�. !1 I I 1!F 1I ..s �.•it:.i:a••r '1.�:� 3 'ti.';i 1 I!! I •r�f ��I II€i 1 Itk;ji. p 1 __ ..."_'rte tf!I!I�Ft'/9�3Q L r...a. •a• .•. t — � ,W :� tllll N 1� ..._....._ _ V.:.����'1{p1:}���{{]{]� L :..... •: ..:::. v'- :.131lF1 t.l Lli rl l l' i! 1'':'��iV 4� ...r.•. :. ' - I' tl i��'3 � ! III�.�I� I���kr!! � r� !il _ _ ., _,_;: l3 r� .... •., , H#lEiu. iit��E flivill i I !P = --- :�tltt'$fl�ti 7 W. IGUA.STIJ i49 R.B W. s - :::: : •• '••• t 2452 11 SE 1 32130" ....�5t f FONT'A NA 7 Ml.Y 4L'1; . INTGRIOR�6EOlOO1C.L.UNVC� RC■ll ".V,Ilf lryl�—r •• M1 •'R 14SCALE 1;24000 I JL • +53�!» 117° -0 _ 1 MILE WESTWIDE MAPS CO. .� ROAD CLASSIFICATION ''sJ 4000 6001) 7000 FEET =nl1f! 3 000 �� 6ZA-21379 oHeavy-duty Light-duty 1 MILOMETER 114 WEST TRIAD 5T. - y ." Unimproved dirt TOUR INTERVAL 40 FEET tQS ANGELES, CALIF, 90013 Medium•dut ���_ EODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 0 Interstate Route 0 U.S. Route O State Route N CALIF N ' ■ CUCAMONGA PEAK, CALIF. wITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS QUADRANGLE LOCATION NE/4 ONTARIO 15' QUADRAHOLE fEY,DENVER.COLORADO 80225,OR RESTON•VIRGINIA 22092 N3407.5—W!1730/7.5 !APHIC MAPS AND SYMBOLS IS AVAILABLE ON REQUEST Revisions shown in purple and woodland compiled from aerial photographs taken 1976 and other source data 1966 This information not field c0b6ked. Map edited 1980 PHOTOREVISED 1980 °'��!/�. is iy` ~..�' •�'"'.` .'s`—��.� � `� rJ �`�:�.��- - -7-,a _��s• -fir��4�... .' �.4, ... _ t _ ~ —)-`' e .++•....�„i:�`;.r,� y/� �•r' 'T`i .'i f+tlfl� � �., tb�.i'' - - 'a:• �''c•.i+.-y r..24titr }'��- - `•�_y"�'� '�� � .' .tip. d� w�.4, - •3 ';� ` ti !�� f �L� 5 r� I if'i. � '�`.,i�+ .. ` ,r•, ; � �p��{{•• 9,F.a ,� '' 'fir... �f •�f��k\. `f�*t I - $J4 f+• -! • ��� _ `,••� mut ev— LL -42 ;'s. ._ ,''•;a ._ .���• r.�w �L' * �.ns:...:: .-�ars'7•�`""�'%'�l"•`r'-"-%x + "r*''�+yT•• 1s•y' •,�J•.L... s•J"- -7}+-: 7:, _-�^._�_ -� •"� X `-'=tib �. }_r.�"',,",�Y� �'�.:}N:j' ..�`���'f �'J!.�'l�i.l-+'•.•Q a�'� �r M�i � ?��� '.�•�� J�.'h � y w �. s�'•:Fx=—,i.:.'�t _-n�,.����%�.r._ �tf7c;�tt;,'�,.�T'if,;,«' z r -- _ � z � �'�''st.�� ��*.�}�yS.�'"+C:�� r ..:�•.�,�^� .r ..;F . - scs r� ^ \ + M.�+i"'. 7! '7�,i'{�v+;L � f fi-•••} -, ���1�1� 7;� :' -�. � r�V.._ f a .wkr:,;� f' �' ram -�' �. LP�- F•�t{r � � ��'•'+ '1''�• -`��. `�• .! � � � ~,�S w y '��' r-.I i,•-t_��Y. -,-'�;',�=C� '..--s' •r�•1•�"��_•�"'�.�ti-�. � .a �ti. _uh. �s � ;+L� � � +� � F•-fir, �' -f • S• �. Jr a r 1 f .h � .�.Yf�'�' � 'f_�r •r--..��'.• � _ - :.-'�`+r • I � 1 - � I r'f� fl „ i0 Y G �1 - (1 I I 71� ji I _ LEGEND: �# NUMBER OF PHOTO DIRMON OF PHOTO PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF r ANDREASEN ENGINEERING, INC. 0 NM AVEW .AUF ;017 I"`PHOTO INDEX MAP s OARKFCF 124 D1-Pg40 x I.'* op All Y } .-- � '# �JnKY�ti yl iwi r.• '.""'r -J."wYl�l�� � { �� i - 1 Y I ; I I I *, w _ at'*,1-�;- .��+ � R - ..�• `Y� Jw l ��`'I ti� rye.. It 7. *° .r..- � .r."w='• 'y,;, .q. _�.;. .-tet f'' -�{,tet. .:� _ '��'i - - i rigs Y 40. �. �, 1��� t'' •t'1� �i � •`H<f�'' fes- F` : � i- Y V � - City of Rancho Cucamonga ` ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: SUBTT18210 2. Related Files: None 3. Description of Project: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18210 - MARK ALLISON - A request to subdivide 4.89 acres into 7 lots for the purpose of developing single-family homes in the Very Low Residential zoning district, located on the south side of Banyan Street between Etiwanda Avenue and Greenwood Place-APN: 0225-171-04, 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Mark Allison 152 South Glendora Avenue West Covina, CA 91790 5. General Plan Designation: Single-f=amily Residential 6. zoning: Very Low Residential 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The site is vacant and is surrounded by single-family residences to the southeast and west. There are vacant residentially zoned lots to the north. The site slopes from north to south and has two short sections of eucalyptus windrows that run from east to west, 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Tabe Van der Zwaag (909) 477-2750 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR— Environmental Impact Report FEIR--Final Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases PM,u—Fine Particulate Matter RWQCB—Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD—South Coast Aar Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan URBEMIS7G—Urban Emissions Model 7G 128 D 1—Pg44 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact," "Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated,"or"Less Than-Significant-Impact"as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. (✓) Aesthetics ( ) Agricultural Resources (✓) Air Quality (✓) Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources (✓) Geology& Soils O Hazards &Waste Materials (✓) Hydrology&Water Quality O Land Use & Planning ( ) Mineral Resources (✓) Noise ( ) Population& Housing ( ) Public Services ( ) Recreation ( ) Transportation/Traffic ( ) Utilities & Service Systems ( ) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there wilt not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. M GATED - t DECLARATION will be prepared. � 1f d� Prepared By: "' f� Date: Reviewed By: I f1 ID� Rev. 5124106 129 D1—Pg45 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB1718210 Page 3 Less Than &gna.ean; Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Svil,aSy agar, Than ISP g s,gnirca^s t.l,agason Irroact Incoraora;ed I coact WIMM EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial affect a scenic vista? O O O (✓) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ( ) {✓) { ) {.) not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? C) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) duality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, ( ) O {✓) { ) which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) There are no significant vistas within or adjacent to the project site. The site is not within a view corridor according to General Plan Exhibit III-15, b) The project site contains no scenic resources and no historic buildings within a StatL- Scenic Highway. There are no State Scenic Highways within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. C) The site is located on the south side of Banyan Street between Etiwanda Avenue and Greenwood Place and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south and east;there is vacant residentially zoned land to the north of the site. The visual quality of the area will not degrade as a result of this project. Design review is required prior to approval, City standards require the developer to underground existing and new utility lines and 'facilities to minimize unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No,87-96. unless exempted by said Resolution. d) The project would increase the number of streetlights and security lighting used in the immediate v.cinity. The design and placement of the light fixtures will be shown on the Site Plans which require review for consistency with City standards that requires shielding, diffusing,or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Lighting will be selected and located to confine the area of illumination to within the project site, The impact is not considered significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or { ) ( ) {✓) { ) Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a { ) O O (✓) Williamson Act contract? C) Involve other changes in the existing environment, {) ( } () {✓) which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? Rev.5124106 130 D 1--Pg46 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 4 Less Than S grtd+cam Less Issues and Su f}p � Sgrtifortin Information Sources: SgiDwnifliany Mtn Than can: lti;;gaton SigndiCan; No Irrpact IncorporWed Impact Irn13 Comments: a) The site is not designated as Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The site is located on the south side of Banyan Street between Etiwanda Avenue and Greenwood Place and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and east; there is vacant residentially zoned land to the north of the site. There are approximately 1,300 acres of Prime Farmlands, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, of which about one-third is either developed or committed to development according to General Plan Table IV-2. The major concentrations of designated farmlands are located in the southern and eastern portions of our City that is characterized by ex sting and planned development. Further, two-thirds of the designated farmland parcels are small, ranging from 3 acres to 30 acres, and their economic viability is doubtful; therefore, they are not intended to be retained as farmland in the General Plan Land Use Plan. The General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) identified the conversion of farmlands to urban uses as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) There is no agriculturally zoned land within the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no Williamson Act contracts within the City. C) The site is located on the south side of Banyan Street between Etiwanda Avenue and Greenwood Place and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south, and east; there is vacant residentially zoned land to the north of the site. The nearest agricultural use is more than 1 mile south from the project site. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. 3. AIR QUALITY. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute O (✓) O ( ) substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? C) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of ( ) () ( ) (✓) any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant () (✓) ( ) ( ) concentrat;ons? e) Create objectionab,e odors affecting a substant-al ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) number of people? Comments: a) As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.6), continued development will contribute to the pollutant levels in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and Rev. 5/24/06 131 D1—Pg47 Initial St,.idy for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 5 Lass Than 51g.l.ka:11 Less �irk• ThanIssues and SupportingInformation Sou�ces: lt%gron S,gnar:aai ., -"v JA VIoorDorated rnpa:t t State standards. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overrid!ng Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Counc 1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FOR was prepared and impacts evaluated. b) During the construction phases of deve'opment, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehic'es, construction worker vehicles, and energy use wi:l generate emissions. In addition, fugitive dust would also be generated during grading and construction activities. While most of the dust would settle on or near the project site, smaller particles would remain in the atmosphere, increasing particle levels within the surrounding area. Construction is an on-going industry in the Rancho Cucamonga area. Construction workers and equipment work and operate at one development site until their tasks are complete. They then transfer to a different site where the process begins again. Therefore, the emissions associated with construction activities are not new to the Rancho Cucamonga area and would not violate an air quality standard or worsen the existing air quality in the region. Nevertheless, fugitive dust and equipment emissions are required to be assessed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) on a project-specific basis. Therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions_ The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and Found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Rev. 5124106 132 D1—Pg48 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 6 Less Than 5 gn-f,am Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pignif.alt 4gat Than Si�,niPcani Ai�r�gaa�n S:,niticarc ]maact -fDo=va:etl Impact • Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PMsa) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,a emissions. 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, short-term construction air quality emissions would remain significant as noted in the General Paan FEIR (Section 5.6). Based upon on the Urban Emissions Model (URBEMIS7G) model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR, Nitrogen Oxides (Nox), Reactive Organic Gases (ROG), and PM10 would exceed SCAQMD thresholds for significance', therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant. The General Plan FEIR identified the citywide increase in em'ssions as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. In the long-term, development consistent with the General Plan would resua in significant operational vehicle emissions based upon on the URBEMIS7G model estimates in Table 5.6-4 of the General Plan FEIR; therefore, would all be cumulatively significant if they cannot be mitigated on a project basis to a level less-than-significant, The following mitination measures shall be implemented: 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiencyllow-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Rev. 5124106 133 D1-Pg49 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB171821 0 Page 7 Less Than S.gn+`cant Less Supporting I-Tformation Sources: �n:a,I� tip!: Tra❑ Issues and Su pp g S�grnficazt M,2gaon S:gahca^a N�. Irwad Incoroora:ed Im'Dan Imoact After implementation of the preceding mitigation measures, the General Pian FFIR identified the citywide increase in operational emiss-ons as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimate'y adopted by the City Council- s) As noted in the General Pian FFIR (Section 5.6) continued development would contribute to the pollutant leve's in the Rancho Cucamonga area, which already exceed Federal and State standards. The General Plan FFIR identified the citywide increase in emissions as a significant and adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The project proposed is consistent with the General Plan for which the FOR was prepared and impacts evaluated, d) Sensitive receptors are defined as populations that are more susceptible to the effects of pollution than the population at large. The SCAQMD identifies the follow-mg as sensitive receptors: long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, retirement homes, residences, schools, playgrounds, child care centers, and athletic facilities. According to the SCAQMD, projects have the potential to create significant impacts if they are located within 1?4 mile of sensitive receptors and would emit toxic air contaminants identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401. The project site is located more than 114 mile from the nearest sensitive receptor. Therefore, no adverse impacts are anticipated. e] Typically, the uses proposed do not create objectionable odors. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ( ) { ) ( ) {✓) through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on riparian habitat O { ) O (✓) or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? C) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ( } O O (✓} protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? 4. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native () ( ) ( ] (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Rev. 5124106 134 Di—Pg50 4 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB1718210 Page 8 Less Tnan S gniLcant Less Po=an;ianv vrt, Tran Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S;gn ficant 6Lugat on Srgmt,cant Na Impact Incorpera,ed tmnact Irmact e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances O O O (✓) protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Comments: a) The project site is located in an area developed with residential uses. The site has been previously disrupted during construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development wili not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. b) The project site is located in an urban area with no natural communities. No riparian habitat exists on-site, meaning the project will not have any impacts. C) No wetland habitat is present on-site. As a result, project implementation would have no impact on these resources. d) The majority of the surrounding area has been or is being developed, thereby disrupting any wildlife corridors that may have existed. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) There are heritage trees on the project site. According to the arborist report prepared for the project, there are a total of 46 Eucalyptus trees on-site that meet the minimum criteria for designation as heritage trees. All the trees belong to the same genus and species: Eucalyptus viminalis. Of these trees, 3 are dead and the remaining 43 trees have not been cared for and are in need of pruning. Additionally, all the trees are infected with the tortoise beetle. The arborist report indicates that because of the poor health of the trees, their location and the slope of the land, most of the trees will probably be lost or removed for development of the proposed lots. The City will require the developers of the individual lots to plant replacement trees on a ane-for-one basis. Additionally, the site is within a planning area governed by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The specific plan requires Eucalyptus trees to be planted in the 5 foot parkway landscape area along Banyan Street and along the south and west property lines at a rate of one tree per 8 linear feet of property fine and in a windrow pattern. This translates into approximately 150 new trees (1,200 linear feet of property tinelone tree per 8 linear feet), 104 in excess of the maximum number of trees proposed to be removed. The following mitigation measures will ensure impacts to the heritage trees are at a less-than-significant level: 1) The existing eucalyptus windrows shall be replaced by the future developers of the lots with Eucalyptus maculate (spotted gum) to meet the windrow planting requirement outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The new windrow plantings shall be generally guided by the established 330-foot by Rev. 5124106 135 D1—Pg51 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB1718210 Page 9 LKss Thai S gn-bCant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potent.a.;y Vli:h Than pp g S gn t tarn flt gasm Sigi&cant Na Irrnact Incornora'ed lnWact Jrraxt 660-foot grid pattern, and be planted in the required 5-foot streetscape landscape area along the south side of Banyan Street and along the south and west property lines. The trees shall be 15-gallon size, staked and irrigated and planted on center in a windrow pattern at a rate of one tree per 8 liner feet of property line. f) The protect site is not located within a conservation area according to the General Plan, Open Space and Conservation Plan, Exhibit IV-4. No conflicts with habitat conservation plans will occur. 5. CULTURAL.RESOURCES. Would the project_ a) Cause a substantial adverse change In the ( ) ( ) { ) (✓) significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) significance of an archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? C) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) outside of formal cemeteries? Comments: a) The project site has not been identified as a "Historic Resource' per the standards of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 2.24 (Historic Preservation). There will be no impact. b) There are no known archaeological sites or resources recorded on the project site; however, the Rancho Cucamonga area is known to have been inhabited by Native Americans according to the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11). Construction activity, particularly grading, soil excavation and compaction, could adversely affect or eliminate existing and potential archaeological resources. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented- 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value, • Consider establishing provisions to require fncorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. Rev_5/24/06 136 D1—Pg52 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 10 Less Than S,pnif;cant Less ��gr.ial y Wi[h Thal" Issues and Supporting Information Sources: -,rdcan; h,itiQaaon Thal" No Izwa-, IncorDwated Imnact mpact • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEOA guidelines. • Prepare a technical resources management report, documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. C) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.11) indicates that the Rancho Cucamonga area is on an alluvial fan. According to the San Bernardino County database, no pa:eontolog;cal sites or resources have been recorded within the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the sphere-of-influence, including the project site; however, the area has a high sensitivity rating for paleontological resources. The older alluvium, which would have been deposited during the wetter climate that prevailed 10,000-100,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene epoch of the Quaternary period, when the last "Ice Age" and the appearance of modern man occurred, may contain significant vertebrate fossils. The project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium per General Plan Exhibit V-2; therefore, the following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to,the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation In the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. d) The proposed project is in an area that has already been disturbed by development. The project site has already been disrupted by construction of infrastructure and surrounding developments/annual discing for weed abatement. No known religious or sacred sites exist within the project area. No evidence is in place to suggest the project site has been used for human burials. The California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) states that if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the Rev. 5/24106 137 D1—Pg53 (nitial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 11 L ess7 han srgm.l.-ani Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources' POien'a4xiha.F s,gn:lran r; �.S,dga7ian S�q'si5;'V-11 .,.. trrpa.t ncorpove:P Impa'. irr_azt County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. As adherence to State regulations is required for all deve>opment, no mitigation is required in the unlikely event human remains are discovered on-site. No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of foss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( } ( ) ( } (✓} iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including ( } { } ( } (✓) liquefaction? iv) Landslides? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓} b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? O (✓) ( } () C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, ( ) ( } ( ) {✓) or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ( } ( ) { } (✓) 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use ( } ( ) ( } (✓) of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: a) No known faults pass through the site and it is not in an Earthquake Fault Zone, nor is it in the Rancho Cucamonga City Special Study Zone along the Red Hill Fault, according to the General Plan Exhibit V-1, and Section 5.1 of the General Plan FEIR. The Red Hill Fault, passes within 1.25 mde northwest of the site, and the Cucamonga Fault Zone lies approximately 2 miles north. These faults are both capable of producing M, 6.0.7.0 earthquakes. Also,the San Jacinto fault, capable of producing up to MW 7.5 earthquakes is 10 mRes northeasterly of the site and the San Andreas, capable of up to M„,8.2 earthquakes, is 12 miles northeasterly of the site. Each of these faults can produce strong ground shaking. Adhering to the Uniform Building Code will ensure that geologic impacts are less-than-significant. Rev. 5124106 138 D1—Pg54 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB1718210 Page 12 Less Than S,gnifican: Less PatemIssues and Supporting Information Sources: Sigmt�anllly wa!; Than 5�gn�t;canl IJ�;�garon Signi4can: Np Impact Incorporate(i Impact Imnaci The proposed project will require the excavation, stockpiling, and/or movement of on-site soils. The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions during September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities may temporarily exacerbate the impacts of windblown sand, resulting in temporary problems of dust control; however, development of this project under the General Plan would help to reduce windblown sand impacts in the area as pavement, roads, buildings, and landscaping are established. Therefore, the following fugitive dust mitigation measures shall be implemented to reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels: 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAOMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWOCB) daily to reduce PM,o emissions, in accordance with SCAOMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMIO emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil stabilizers (approved by SCAOMD and RWOCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,o emissions. C) The General Plan FEIR (Section 51) indicates that subsidence is generally associated with large decreases or withdrawals of water from the aquifer. The project would not withdraw water from the existing aquifer. The site is not within a geotechnical hazardous area or other unstable geologic unit or soil type according to General Plan FEIR Figure 5.1-2. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan FOR Exhibit 5.1-3. No adverse impacts are anticipated. d) The majority of Rancho Cucamonga, including the project site, is located on alluvial soil deposits. These types of soils are not considered to be expansive. Soil types on-site consist of Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand Soil association according to General Plan Exhibit V-3 and General Plan FEIR Exhibit 5.1-3. These soils are typically used for irrigated small grains and pasture plants. It is a favored soil for lemons in the west end of the survey are north of Foothill Boulevard. Runoff is very slow to slow, and the hazard of erosion is slight because of the gravelly surface layer. No adverse impacts are anticipated. e) The project will connect to, and be served by, the existing local sewer system for wastewater disposal. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal is proposed. Rev. 5124106 139 Di—Pg55 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB1718210 Page 13 Less Than S gni„ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pazanlaly LJ:h Than Signil;,unl �,1�1 gason S,gndlcant Ky 1rnpaJ IncarpGra'sr] trn= IM-0W 7. HAZARDS AND WASTE MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) {) { y } environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ( ) ( ) ( ) {✓) environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 114 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ( ) ( ) { ) ( ) hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( ) ( y ( } {* } where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) {✓) would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) } { � {✓) loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Comments- a) The project wi?t not involve the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive that any other in the state. The City is in the process of develop-.ng an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Federal requirements_ The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials and/or waste will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant- No adverse impacts are expected. b) The proposed project does not include the use of hazardous materials or vo'atile fuels. The City participates in a countywide interagency coalition that is considered a full-service Hazardous Materials Division that is more comprehensive than any other in the state. The City is in the process of developing an Emergency Operations Plan to meet State and Rev. 5124106 140 D1—Pg56 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 14 Less Than 5ignihcant Less Issues and Su ortin Information Sources: P..:e^La.Y wilt, Than PP g sq7 ficart M.:iga:iun significant NO IrnpaIt Incorporated Irrpact I,,aa. Federal requirements. The City has approved a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan which has received State and Federal approvals. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning the storage and handling of hazardous materials or volatile fuels will reduce the potential for significant impacts to a level less-than-significant. No adverse impacts are anticipated. C) There are no schools located within 114 mile of the project site. The project site is located within 112 mile of the nearest existing or proposed school. d) The proposed project is not listed as a hazardous waste or substance materials site. A recent site inspection did not reveal the presence of discarded drums or illegal dumping of hazardous materials. No impact is anticipated. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The project site is located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Airport, is located approximately 2-112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. g) The City's Multi-Hazard Disaster Pian, which is updated every two years, includes policies and procedures to be administered by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District in the event of a disaster. Because the project includes at least two points of public street access and is required to comply with all applicable City codes, including local fire ordinances, no adverse impacts are anticipated. h) Rancho Cucamonga faces the greatest ongoing threat from a wind-driven fire in the Urban Wildland Interface area found in the northern part of the City according to the Fire District Strategic Plan 2000-2005; however, the proposed project site is not located within a high fire hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-7, 8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ( ) (✓) ( ) ( } requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? C) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Rev. 5124106 141 D1--pg5y Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB-FT18210 Page 15 Less Than S:gn,Lcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S,gliflarrl vcth Than $�^ynif.cd''.t ISLLga::9n 1 5'gn.I;Carlt Na lmpaCl Incorpp;a;ed Impact Impact d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the ( ) ( ) {) (✓) site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner, which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed ( ) { ) ( } (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ( } (✓) ( ) { ) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as ( ) ( } ( ) {✓) mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures () ( ) ( ) (✓) that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ( ) ( ) () (✓) Comments: a) Water and sewer service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The project is designed to connect to the existing water and sewer systems. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act. The General Construction Permit treats any construction activity over 1 acre as an industrial activity, requiring a permit under the State's General NPDES permit. The State Water Resource Control Board (SWRCB) through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), Santa Ana Region, administers these permits. Construction activities covered under the State's General Construction permit include removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity for new development or significant redevelopment. Prior to commencement of construction of a project, a discharger must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the General Permit. The General Permit requires all dischargers to comply with the following during construction activities, including site clearance and grading: • Develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pla.-I (SWPPP) that would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would prevent construction pollutants from contacting storm water and with the intent of keeping all products of erosion from moving off-site into receiving waters. • Eliminate or reduce non-storm water discharges to storm sewer systems and other waters of the nation. • Perform inspections of all BMPs. Rev. 5124106 142 D1--Pg58 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBT718210 Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: SISInAiant w�It, Than Slgnfinnt MtigaCon SlgnificaM No Impact Incefporated Impact Impact Waste discharges include discharges of storm water and construction project discharges. A construction project for new development or significant redevelopment requires an NPDES permit. Construction project proponents are required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Pian (SWPPP). To comply with the NPDES, the project construction contractor will be required to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) during construction activities, and a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for post-construction operational management of storm water runoff. The applicant has submitted a WQMP, prepared by Green Tree Environmental Management on August 1, 2006, that identifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the amount of pollutants, such as eroded soils, entering the drainage system after construction. Runoff from driveways, roads, and other impermeable surfaces must be controlled through an on-site drainage system. BMPs include both structural and non-structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant levels include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non-structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing Erosion and Sediment Control Pians, and various Business Plans that must be developed by any businesses that store and use hazardous materials. Practices, such as periodic parking lot sweeping can substantially reduce the amount of pollutants entering the stomp drain system. The following mitigation measures would be required to control additional storm water effluent: Construction Activities: 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval,Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs)that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction,temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Rev. 5124106 143 D1—Pg59 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pae��'y w� Than Sig"i5mnt MitiQafion Segnificant No Im ast Inco rated Impact tm act Post Construction Operational., 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Green Tree Environmental Management on August 1, 2006, to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Rooftop run-off shall be captured in the adjacent landscaped yard areas, which will then infiltrate the run off,thus decreasing the site run-off. b) According to CVVVD, 43 percent of the City's water is currently provided from ground water in the Cucamonga and Chino Basins. CVVVD has adopted a master plan that estimates demand needs until the year 2030, The proposed project will not deplete groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with recharge because it is not within an area designated as a recharge basin or spreading ground according to General Plan Exhibit IV-2. The development of the site will require the grading of the site and excavation; however, would not affect the existing aquifer, estimated to be about 288 to 470 feet below the ground surface. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.9), continued development citywide will Increase water needs and is a significant impact, however, CVVVD has plans to meet this increased need through the construction of future water facilities. c) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to the existing storm drain facilities,which have been designed to handle the flows. The project design includes landscaping of all non-hardscape areas to prevent erosion. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, the project will not result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, the project will not alter the course of any stream or river. All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will cause changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, and the rate and amount of surface water runoff because of the amount of new building and hardscape proposed on a site; however, all runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain facilities, which have been designed to handle the flows. The project will not result in substantial Rev.5124106 144 D1—Pg60 Initial Study for C. City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 18 Lass Than 5Jgnftant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially wu' Than Significant Mitigation Slg"illmpf NO Impact Inca tad Impact Jm act additional sources of polluted runoff. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Therefore, increase in runoff from the site will not result in flooding on- or off-site. No impacts are anticipated. f) Grading activities associated with the construction period could result in a temporary increase in the amount of suspended solids in surface flows during a concurrent storm event, thus resulting in surface water quality impacts. The site is for new development or significant redevelopment; therefore, is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to minimize water pollution. The following mitigation measures shall be implemented: 8) Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non- structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shalt obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Stone Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. g) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. h) The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. 1) The Rancho Cucamonga area is flood protected by an extensive storm drain system designed to convey a 100-year storm event. The system is substantially Improved and provides an integrated approach for regional and local drainage flows. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, spreading grounds, concrete-lined channels, and underground storm drains as shown in General Plan Exhibit V-6. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area according to General Plan Exhibit V-5. No adverse impacts are expected. D There are no oceans, lakes or reservoirs near the project site; therefore, impacts from selche and tsunami are not anticipated. The Rancho Cucamonga area sits at the base of the steep eastern San Gabriel Mountains whose deep canyons were cut by mountain streams. Numerous man-made controls have been constructed to reduce the mudflow Impacts to the level of non-significance within the City. This existing system includes several debris dams and levees north of the City, and spreading grounds both within and north of the City. Rev. 5/24/06 145 D1--pg61 �I { Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 19 Less Than S pnd cant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Poten:a�y w'„ Thaa S.gndxant M'%;Gascn S grnnCant Ma Pnaac: lneorpora%d hrua-1 rttpa.a 9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project- a) Physically divide an established community? ( } { ) ( } (✓) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ( ) ( } ( ) (✓) regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? C) Conffict with any applicable habitat conservatkon plan ( } ( ) ( } (✓) or natural community conservation plari? Comments- a) The site is located on the south side of Summit Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Greenwood Place and is characterized by single-family residential development to the north, south and east; there is vacant residentially zoned land to the north of the site. This project will be of similar design and size to surrounding residential development to the south, east and west. The vacant parcels to the north are residentially zoned and will eventually be developed with a similar design and size to the subject surrounding parcels. The pro)ect will become a part of the larger community. No adverse impacts are anticipated. b) The project site land use designation is Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre). The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and does not interfere with any policies for environmental protection. As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The project site is not located within any habitat conservation or natural community plan area. According to the General Plan Exhibit IV-3, and Section 5.3 of the General Plan FEIR, the project site is not within an area of sensitive biological resources; therefore, development will not adversely affect rare or endangered species of plants or animals because of the fact that the project is surrounded by urbanized land uses and is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Plan. 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project. a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ( ) { ) (} (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important ( } ( } ( ) (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a) The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area according to the City General Pian, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1; therefore, there is no impact. b) The site is not designated by the General Plan, Figure IV-1 and Table IV-1, as a valuable minera;resource recovery site; therefore, there is no impact, Rev. 5124/06 146 D1—Pg62 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 20 Less Than Signifi=ant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P�tenval y wtn than S gndi=lt Mit gat an Significant Impa=E in.-orporated lr; ar lnwaa 11. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in ( ) (✓) ( ) ( ) excess of standards established in the focal general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive O ( } O (✓) ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? C) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in (} (✓) ( ) ( ) ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ( } ( ) ( ) (✓} where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Comments: a) The project site is within an area of noise levels exceeding City standards according to General Plan Exhibit V-13 at build-out. Since the General Plan was adopted in 2001, the 1-210 Freeway was completed which included a depressed grade and sound attenuation walls. A Noise Study of completed on November 21, 2006 by URS. They found that the outside noise levels as measured in the rear yards of each of the proposed lots did not exceed the 60 dB limit outlined in the General Plan. Additionally, the study found that the predicted noise levels in 2005 would also be below the 60 dB limit. Because the proposed lots will not be exposed to noise levels exceeding the 60 dB limit, URL considered an interior noise analysis unnecessary. b) As such, no impacts are anticipated. C) The primary source of ambient noise levels in Rancho Cucamonga is traffic. The proposed activities will not significantly increase traffic; hence are not anticipated to increase the ambient noise levels within the vicinity of the project. d) The General Plan FEIR (Section 5.7) ind.cates that during a construction phase, on-site stationary sources, heavy-duty construction vehicles, and construction equipment, will generate noise exceeding City standards. The following measures are provided to mitigate the short-term noise impacts: 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Rev. 5124106 147 D1—Pg63 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB- T18210 Page 21 Less Tran S gni:', as; Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: P°1111:aql `'at Than ph g S grol:cant 1,1.Lga::on S gn,ticant No Impa_�: 1rinorprra*ed Impact imoa_t 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. The preceding mitigation measures will reduce the disturbance created by on-site construction equipment; however, do not address the potential impacts because of the transport of construction materials and debris, The following mitigation measure shall then be required: 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. e) The site is not located within an Airport Land Use Plan and is not within 2 miles of a public airport. The site is located approximately 7 mites northerly of the Ontario Airport and is offset north of the flight path. No impact is anticipated. f) The nearest private airstrip, Cable Xrport, is located approximately 2-112 miles to the west of the City's westerly limits. No impact is anticipated. 12. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, O O O (✓} necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? C) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating () ( ) { ) {✓) the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: a) The project is located in a predominantly developed area and will not induce population growth. Construction activities at the site will be short-term and will not attract new employees to the area_ leo impacts are anticipated. Rev. 5124106 148 D1—Pg64 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB1718210 Page 22 Less Than S gmf cant less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potent aLyth Than $gni'r_ant Lyth Significant No IM433:1 lMgrpera!ad 1 Imoacl tmpan b) The project site contains no existing housing units. No adverse impact expected. C) The project site is vacant land. No impacts are anticipated. 13. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? O O O (✓) b) Police protection? O O O (✓) C) Schools? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) d) Parks? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) e) Other public facilities? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) Comments: a) The site, located on the south side of Summit Avenue between Etiwanda Avenue and Greenwood Place, would be served by a fire station located approximately 314 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Standard conditions of approval from the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will be placed on the project so no impacts to fire services will occur. No impacts are anticipated. b) Additional police protection is not required as the addition of the project will not change the pattern of uses within the surrounding area and will not have a substantial increase in property to be patrolled as the project site is within an area that is regularly patrolled. C) The Etiwanda School District and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District serve the project area. Both school districts have been notified regarding the proposed development. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay the School Impact Fees. With this standard mitigation, impacts to the School Districts are not considered significant. d) The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Etiwanda Creek Community ark, is located 314 mile from the project site. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project will utilize existing public facilities. The site is in a developed area, currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The project will not require the construction of any new facilities or alteration of any existing facilities or cause a decline in the levels of service, which could cause the need to construct new facilities. Cumulative development within Rancho Cucamonga will increase demand for library services. Rev. 5124106 149 D1—Pg65 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 23 Less Than 5'armCant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources- 5.;:; ,„, M.tgah than U , '.on S-En&cari! N' Fmpa:E Mcorpora'ed [mpa_: t According to the Genera€ Plan FEIR (Section 5.9.9), the projected increase in library space under the General Plan will not meet the projected demand. The General Plan FEIR identified the cumulative impact on library services as a significant unavoidable adverse impact for which a Statement of Overriding Considerations was ultimately adopted by the City Council. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the EIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. Since the adoption of the General Plan, the City has planned a new library within the Victoria Gardens regional shopping center of approximately 22,000 square feet, which is in excess of the projected need of 15,500 square feet at build-out of the City. 14. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ( ) ( } ( ) (✓} regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or () ( ) ( ) (✓) require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a) The site is in a developed area,currently served by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The nearest park, Etiwanda Creek Community Park is located 314 mile from the project site. This project is not proposing any new housing or large employment generator that would cause an increase in the use of parks or other recreational facilities. A standard condition of approval will require the developer to pay Park Development Fees. No Impacts are anticipated. b) See a) response above. 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in { ) ( ) ( ) (✓) relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of ( ) { ) ( ) (✓) service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? C) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including O O O (✓} either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Rev.5/24106 150 D1—Pg66 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB- T18210 Page 24 Less Than S9rW-an1 Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: S.gn"a `'`',, Than '1.ai I f.l�hpa5on S,artficant r;r. Irrpasr Incorpora,ed Impacl rnp,'_t e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs ( ) { ) ( ) (✓) supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? Comments: a) Implementation of the proposed project will generate 91 vehicle trips daily. The proposed project includes the development of 7 single-family dwelling units. The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family detached dwelling unit will generate 1 two-way peak hour trips daily. As noted in the General Plan FEIR (Section 5.5), continued development will contribute to the traffic load in the Rancho Cucamonga area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan for which the FEIR was prepared and impacts evaluated. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with street improvements existing or included in project design. The project will not create a substantial increase in the number of vehicle trips, traffic volume or congestion at intersections. The project site will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site per City roadway standards. In addition, the City has established a Transportation Development fee that must be paid by the applicant prior to issuance of Building Permit. Fees are used to fund roadway improvements necessary to support adequate traffic circulation. No impacts are anticipated. b) The Rancho Cucamonga Traffic Model estimates that each single-family detached dwelling unit will generate 4 two-way peak hour trips daily. In November 2004, San Bernardino County voters passed the Measure I extension which requires local jurisdictions to impose appropriate fees on development for their fair share toward regional transportation improvement projects. On May 18, 2005, the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted a Comprehensive Transportation Fee Schedule updating these Development Impact Fees. As a result, the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Agency waived the Congestion Management Plan (CMP) Traffic Impact Analysis reporting requirement. This project will be required, as a condition of approval, to pay the adopted Transportation Development Fee prior to issuance of a Building Permit. The project is in an area that is mostly developed with all street improvements existing. The project will not negatively impact the level of service standards on adjacent arterials. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. No impacts are anticipated. C) Located approximately 7 miles northerly of the Ontario Airport, the site is offset north of the flight path and will not change air traffic patterns. No impacts are anticipated. d) The project is in an area that is mostly developed. The project will be required to provide street improvements (curb, gutter and sidewalk) along the street frontage of the site. The project design does not include any sharp curves or dangerous intersections or farming uses. The project will, therefore, not create a substantial increase in hazards because of a design feature. No impacts are anticipated. e) The project will be designed to provide access for all emergency vehicles and will, therefore, not create an inadequate emergency access. No impacts are anticipated. Rev. 5/24/06 151 D1--Pg67 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 25 Less than SgmGcamt less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Pc.er;any vrtt, rYa". Signfcant F.V:gat:on S�V;f:car,t No Impact IncomcrweG Inva_t Irnoact f) The project design has adequate parking in compliance with standards of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code and wirl therefore not create an inadequate parking capacity. No impacts are anticipated. g) The project des;gn incudes, or the project will be conditioned to provide, features supporting transportation and vehicle trip reduction (e.g., bus bays, bicycle racks, carpool parking.etc_). 16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or ( } ( ) ( ) (✓) wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? C) Require or result in the construction of new storm ( ) ( ) ( } (✓) water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ( } { ) ( ) {✓) project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment ( } ( } ( ) (✓) provider, which serves or may serve the project, that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ( ) { ) ( ) (✓} capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and O ( } { ) (✓) regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utililies Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga_ The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. b) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system. which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which is at capacity_ The project is required to meet the requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater. No impacts are anticipated. C) All runoff will be conveyed to existing storm drain fac lities, which have been designed to handle the flows. A Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official Rev. 5124106 152 D1—Pg68 r Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUB1718210 Page 26 Less Than S gnidcant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: PotenSgMA.a p wdh Than g�+icant 1.UGgaEon S+gnilcant PJB Impact Incomowed Impact, hnp= and City Engineer prior to issuance of Grading Permits. The impact is not considered significant. d) The project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District water system. There is currently a sufficient water supply available to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to serve this project. No impacts are anticipated. e) The proposed project is served by the Cucamonga Valley Water District sewer system, which has waste treated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency at the RP-4 treatment plant located within Rancho Cucamonga and RP-1 located within City of Ontario, neither of which are at capacity. No impacts are anticipated. f) Solid waste disposal will be provided by the current City contracted hauler who disposes the refuse at a permitted landfill with sufficient capacity to handle the City's solid waste d'sposal needs. g) This project complies with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations regarding so`id waste. The City of Rancho Cucamonga cont!nues to implement waste reduction procedures consistent with AB 939. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated. 17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the ( ) ( ) ( ) (✓) quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually { ) ( ) ( ) (✓) limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? C) Does the project have environmental effects that will { ) ( ) ( ) (✓) cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) The site is not located in an area of sensitive biological resources as identified on the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Exhibit IV-3. Additionally, the area surrounding the site is developed. Based on previous development and street improvements, it is unlikely that any endangered or rare species would inhabit the site. b) If the proposed project were approved, then the applicant would be required to develop the site in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, The Rev. 5124106 153 D1--Pg69 Initial Study for City of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 27 2001 General Plan was adopted along with the certification of a Program FEIR, Findings o' Fact, and a Statement of Overriding Cons'derations for signif-bant adverse envirornmentar effects of build-out in the City and Sphere of Influence. The City made findings that adoption of the General Plan would result in significant adverse effects to aggregate resources, prime farmland, air quality, the acoustical environment, library services, and aesthetics and visual resources_ Mitigation measures were adopted for each of these resources: however, they would not reduce impacts to less-than-significant levels, As such, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations balancing the benefits of development under the General Plan Update against the significant unavoidable adverse impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15092 and 15096(h)). These benefits include less overall traffic volumes by developing mixed-use projects that will be pedestrian friendly and conservation of valuable natura€ open space. With these findings and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, no further discussion or evaluation of cumulative impacts is required. C) Deve`opment of the site under the proposed land use change would not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The Initial Study identifies construction-related emissions of criteria pollutants as having a potentially significant impact_ Proposed mitigation measures would further reduce emission levels. Additionally, impacts resulting from air quality would be short-term and would cease once construction activities were completed. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts associated with the exposure of people to increased noise levels. Mitigation measures contained in this Initial Study will ensure impacts are at less-than-significant levels_ EARLIER ANALYSES Earl;er analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in ar earlier EIR or Negative Declaration per Section 15063(c)(3)(D). The effects identified above for this project were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in the following earlier document(s) pursuant to applicab"e legal standards, and such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. The following earlier analyses were utilized in completing this Initial Study and are available for review in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Planning Division offices, 10500 Civic Center Drive (check all that apply): (T) General Plan FEIR (SCH#2000061027, Certifl.ed October 17,2001) (T) Master Environmental Assessment for the 1989 General Plan Update (SCH #88020115, certified January 4, 1989) (T) Etiwanda Specific Plan EIR (SCH 482061801, certified July 6, 1983) Rev. 5124106 154 D1—Pg70 Initial Study for -ity of Rancho Cucamonga SUBTT18210 Page 28 APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that i have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: r Date: G /S 0 Print Name and Title: - Rev. 5124106 155 d1-Pg71 { RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18210, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 4.89 ACRES OF LAND INTO 7 LOTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES IN THE VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET BETWEEN GREENWOOD PLACE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE.AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF— APN: 0225-171-04. A. Recitals. 1. Mark Allison filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, as described in the title of this Resolution, Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of March 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred_ B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on March 28,2007,including written and oral staff reports,together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Etiwanda Avenue; and b. The subject property is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The site slopes from north to south and has two short sections of Eucalyptus windrows that run from east to west near the center of the lot and along the north property line of the site; and C. The project is surrounded by single-family residential development to the south, east_ and west. The lots to north of the site, across Banyan Street, are undeveloped single-family residential zoned lots; and d_ The application is to subdivide approximately 4.89 acres of land into 7 lots consisting of the following square footages; and EXHIBIT D 156 D1—Pg72 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT KJSUBTT18210--MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 2 Lot 1 26,155 square feet Lot 2 24,735 square feet Lot 3 24,830 square feet Lot 4 24,670 square feet Lot 5 22,620 square feet Lot 6 22,610 square feet Lot 7 33,050 square feet Average Lot Size 25,524 square feet e. The average lot size is 25,524 square feet which exceeds the 25,000 square foot average required in the Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and f. Access to all lots will be from a new cul-de-sac off Banyan Street. The project includes the development of a local feeder trail at the rear of each lot. In addition, a Community Trail is proposed across the frontage of Lot 1 on the south side of Banyan Street, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; and e. The tentative tract map is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and f. The design of the tentative tract map will not conflictwith any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQX)and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City staff prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that,with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would 157 D1—Pg73 PLANNING COMMISSION RF-oOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT Mf 3UBTT18210--MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 3 have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter. the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission_ Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision its based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) All perimeter walls shall be decorative and have a uniform design which is compatible with those in the area. 2) Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00765 is hereby approved for the removal of 46 Eucalyptus trees. All Eucalyptus windrow trees identified for removal shall be replaced with 15-gallon Eucalyptus maculate(Spotted Gum)trees, 8 feet on center, as required by the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance and Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3) Because of Borer beetle infestation, all Eucalyptus tree wood shall be chipped, removed, and buried at a dump site or tarped to the ground for a minimum of 6 months, sealing the tarp edges with soil,to prevent emerging Borer beetles from reinfesting other trees or wood. The movement of Eucalyptus wood containing live Borer beetles, or their larvae, in trucks or trailers is prohibited by State law pursuant to Public Resources Code 4714.5. 4) Improve a Community Trail within the parkway of Banyan Avenue per City standard 1003 (Front-On). 158 D1—Pg74 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT Ml SUBTT18210—MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 4 5) Provide a minimum 15-foot wide improved Local Feeder Equestrian Trail easement at the rear of each lot. 6) Create a drive approach adjacent to the west property line along Banyan Avenue in order to provide a vehicle access point to the private equestrian trail for the purpose of servicing the equestrian uses. 7) Any drainage structures shall be located outside of the Local Feeder Trail easements. 8) The proposed v-gutter along the west property line shall have a maximum depth�of 6 inches in order to prevent injuries to equestrian users. 9) Provide a Feeder Trail 20 feet to 15 feet Transition Vehicle Gate, a City Standard "Unauthorized Vehicles Prohibited"sign, and a side step through for horse access per City standard 1006-B at the entrance of the private equestrian trail easement along Banyan Street. 10) Install minimum 10-foot wide decorative gates at the rear of each lot in order to provide access to the private equestrian trail easement. 11) The trail surface shall be decomposed granite with a minimum 4-inch base. Prior to installation of surface material, remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. Engineering De artment 1) Banyan Street frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Collector"standards and the Etiwanda Specific Pian including but not limited to the following: a) Install Community Trail improvements, street trees, and landscaping per City Standards and match the existing improvements and landscaping west of Greenwood Place. The 3-foot landscaping and irrigation area along the side yard of Lot 1 shall be privately maintained. Plans for these areas shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department with the exception of street trees. b) Protect the existing curb and gutter or repair as required. c) Provide 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights, access ramps, and street trees. d) Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. e) Provide R26(s) "No Stopping Anytime" signs. 2) Street "A" improvements to be in accordance with City "Local Street' standards as required and including: 159 D1—Pg75 PLANNING COMMISSION_ RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT Mf 3UBTT18210—MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 5 a) Provide a.c. pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk. street trees and drive approaches. b) Provide 5800 Lumens HPSV street lights. c) Provide traffic signing and striping: as required. d) The easterly parkway of Street "A" shall be rockscaped per City Standards. e) The sidewalk shall be extended up to the easterly portion of Lot 7- 3) The existing overread utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Banyan Street shall be undergrounded from the first pole off-site of the west project boundary to the first pole off-site of the east project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy,whichever occurs first. All services crossing Banyan Street shall also be undergrounded. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted costs for undergrounding from future development as it occurs on the opposite side of the street, If the developer fails to submit for said reimbursement agreement w.ithin 6 months of the public improvements being accepted by the City, all rights for the developer to reimbursement shall be terminated. 4) An in-lieu flee as reimbursement forthe previously constructed frontage improvements on Banyan Street (formerly Summit Avenue) shall be paid to the City prior to final map approval or prior to issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. The fee shall be in conformance with the approved Frontage Improvements Agreement SRA-26. The amount for APN 225-171-04 is $ 19,242.08 plus 10 percent interest per year from the approval of the agreement (March 20, 2002). 5) The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) submitted with the tentative tract map application has been reviewed and found to be substantially complete. Include the Best Management practices (BMPs) identified in the plan on the Grading Plans when submitted for technical plan check. Environmental Mitigation Air Quality 1} All construction equipment shall be maintained in good operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shalt ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers'specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the construction site for City verification. 160 D1--Pg76 PLANNING COMMISSI N RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT f SUBTT18210—MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 6 2) Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the developer shall submit construction plans to City denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized,or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff. 3) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. 4) All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. 5) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following provisions: • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. Timing may vary depending upon time of year of construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds(i.e.,wind speeds exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. 6) The site shall be treated with water or other-soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB])daily to reduce Fine Particulate Matter(PM,Q)emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. 7) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM10 emissions. 161 D1—Pg77 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT " SUBTT18210—MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 7 8) The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible, 9) The construction contractor shall ensure that construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. 10) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, appliances, and water heaters. 11) Ali residential and commercial structures shall be required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources 1} The existing eucalyptus windrows shall be replaced by the future developers of the lots with Eucalyptus maculata(spotted gum) to meet the windrow planting requirement outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The new windrow plantings shall be generally guided by the established 330-foot by 660-foot grid pattern, and be planted in the required 5-foot streetscape landscape area along the south side of Banyan Street and along the south and west property lines. The trees shall be 15-gallon size,staked and irrigated and planted on center in a windrow pattern at a rate of one tree per 8 liner feet of property line, Cultural Resources 1) If any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities,to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study_ With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: • Enact interim measures to protect undesignated sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value, • Consider establishing provisions to require incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments,using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. • Pursue educating the public about the archaeological heritage of the area. • Propose mitigation measures and recommend conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines, • Prepare a technical resources management report,documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources 162 D1—Pg78 PLANNING COMMISSI N RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT M )SUBTT18210—MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 8 within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. 2) If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures(i.e., paleontological monitoring)that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: + Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Geology and Soils 1) The site shall be treated with water or other soil-stabilizing agent (approved by'SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule established by the City to reduce PM10 emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PM10 emissions from the site during such episodes. 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM70 emissions. 163 D1—Pg79 PLANNING COMMI`SS ON RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT M, SUBTT18210—MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 9 Hydrology and Wafer 1) Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in grading plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in southern California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff_ 4) During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. Post Construction Operational: 5) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Green Tree Environmental Management on August 1,2006,to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical, 6) Landscaping plans shall include provisions for controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers1pesticideslherbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. 7) Rooftop run-off shall be captured in the adjacent landscaped yard areas, which will then infiltrate the run off, thus decreasing the site run-off. 8) Prior to issuance of Building Permits,the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan 164 D 1—Pg80 PLANNING COMMISS � RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT M )SUBTT18210—MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 10 (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in ,tune 2004. 9) Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NO[) to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction. Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number)shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit, Noise 1) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. 2) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. 3) The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early as possible in first phase. 4) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. 165 D1—Pg81 PLANNING COMMISS ON RESOLUTION NO. 07-12 TENTATIVE TRACT MA SUBT71 8210—MARK ALLISON March 28, 2007 Page 11 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2007. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Richard B. Fletcher.Vice Chairman ATTEST: �ft jent� .lam R. Troyer, AICP, Secre ry I, .lames R_Troyer,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of March 2007, by the following vote-to-wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, MCPHAIL, MUNOZ NOES: COMMISSIONERS- NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS, STEWART 166 D1—Pg82 f City of Rancho Cucamonga } MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT18210 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP)has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance.The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management-The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the City Planner, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures -The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action,what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10600 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 167 D1—Pg83 Mitigation Monitoring F ram SU BTT 18210 Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staff's is needed,as determined by the project planner or responsible City department,to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form_ 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures, The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planneror responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division. The Division shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9, In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a pian for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said pian shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 168 D1—Pg84 MITIGATION MONITORING CHECKLIST (INITIAL STUDY PART 111) Project File No.: SUBTf18210 Applicant: Mark Allison Initial Study Prepared by: Mark Allison Date: August 31 2006 FrequencyMitigation Measures No.t Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring . . Date/initials Non-CompliancP Air Quality All construction equipment shall be maintained in good PD C Review of plans A1C 214 operating condition so as to reduce operational emissions. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance records shall be available at the p construction site for City verification. Prior to the issuance of any Grading Permits, the PD/130 C Review of plans C 2 developer shall submit Construction Plans to the City 00 cn denoting the proposed schedule and projected equipment use. Construction contractors shall provide evidence that low-emission mobile construction equipment will be utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible for the project. Contractors shall also conform to any construction measures imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning staff. All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed PD C Review of plans A1C 214 performance standards noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. All asphalt shall meet or exceed performance standards 60 B Review of plans AIC 2 noted in SCAQMD Rule 1108. All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD BO C Review of plans A1C 214 Rules 402 and 403. Additionally, contractors shall co include the following provisions: 1 of 8 Mitigation • ResponsibleMonitoring Timing of Method ofVerified Sanctions • Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site BO C Review of pians AIC 214 through seeding and watering. • Pave or apply gravel to any on-site haul roads. BO C Review of plans A1C 214 • Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large BO C Review of plans AIC 214 areas to erosion over extended periods of time. ■ Schedule activities to minimize the amounts of BO C Review of plans AIC 214 exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. • Dispose of surplus excavated material in BO C Review of plans A 4 accordance with local ordinances and use sound engineering practices. 0 • Sweep streets according to a schedule established BO C During A 4 by the City if silt is carried over to adjacent public construction thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. U3 Timing may vary depending upon time of year of rn construction. • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., BO C During A 4 wind speeds exceeding 25 mph)in accordance with construction SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements. • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio on soils BO C During A 4 haul trucks or cover payloads using tarps or other Construction suitable means. The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction Regional Water Quality Control Board [RWQCB]) daily to reduce Particulate Matter (PM,fl) emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PM,()emissions. V The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean BO C Review of plans AIC 4 alternative fuel-powered equipment where feasible. 2 of 8 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method . Implementing Action for • r • Frequency Verification • D. Non-Compilance The construction contractor shall ensure that BO C Review of plans A1C 214 construction-grading plans include a statement that work crews will shut off equipment when not in use. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans ?,Iq required to incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting healing,air conditioning,appliances,and water heaters. All residential and commercial structures shall be BO CID Review of plans C 04 required to incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping. Biological Resources The existing eucalyptus windrows shall be replaced by CP B Review of Plans C 2 the future developers of the lots with Eucalyptus p maculata (spotted gum) to meet the windrow planting requirement outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan.The new windrow plantings shall be generally guided by the to V established 330-foot by 680-foot grid pattern, and be planted in the required 5 foot streetscape landscape area along the south side of Banyan Street and along the south and west property lines. The trees shall be 15-gallon size, staked and irrigated and planted on center in a windrow pattern at a rate of one tree per 8 liner feet of property line. Cultural Resources t ! It any prehistoric archaeological resources are encountered before or during grading,the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the archaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: ■ Enact interim measures to protect undesignated PD/BO C Review of report A° D 314 sites from demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for the City to establish its archaeological value. 3 of 8 Ivinigation Measures No./ • • • • • • Timing of - r • of - ■ Sanctions for Implementing Action for • • + Frequency Verification • - /initials Non-Comp ■ Consider establishing provisions to require PD/BO Q Review of report ND incorporation of archaeological sites within new developments, using their special qualities as a theme or focal point. Pursue educating the public about the PD/BO C Review of report A/D 3/4 archaeological heritage of the area. ■ Propose mitigation measures and recommend PD/BO C Review of report 3/4 conditions of approval to eliminate adverse project effects on significant, important, and unique prehistoric resources, following appropriate CEQA guidelines. * Prepare a technical resources management report, PD C Review of report A/D documenting the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report,with U300 original illustrations, to the San Bernardino County CO Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. If any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal PD B Review of report A/D 4 fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor M construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: " Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and PD B Review of report )VD 4 equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. N 4of8 Mitigation Measures No. Responsible Monitoring Timing of Method of Verified Sanctions for Implementing Action for Monitoring Frequency Verification Verification Date/initials Non-Compliance • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared BO B/C Review of report AID 4 or graded, divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify,and curate all recovered fossils for PD D Review of report 0 3 -. documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho PD D Review of report D 3 Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy of the report to San Bernardino County p Museum i Geology and Soils cn 00 The site shall be treated with water or other BO C During A 4 soil-stabilizing agent (approved by SCAQMD and construction RWQCB)daily to reduce PM,o emissions,in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or re-planted with drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a BO C During A 4 schedule established by the City to reduce PM,o construction r� emissions associated with vehicle tracking of soil off-site. Timing may vary depending upon the time of year of construction. Grading operations shall be suspended when wind BO C During A 4 speeds exceed 25 mph to minimize PMja emissions construction from the site during such episodes. Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and BO C During A 4 RWQCB) shall be applied to all inactive construction construction areas that remain inactive for 96 hours or more to reduce PMI()emissions. W 5 of 8 Hydrology and Water Quality Prior to issuance of Grading Permits, the permit BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 2M applicant shall submit to Building Official for approval, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in BO B/C/D Review of plans A/C ; the Grading Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground disturbing activities are initialed through completion of grading. This Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a minimum: a)Specify the timing of grading and construction to minimize soil exposure to p rainy periods experienced in Southern California,and b) "j An inspection and maintenance program shall be included to ensure that any erosion which does occur CD either on-site or off-site as a result of this project will be corrected through a remediation or restoration program within a specified time frame. During construction, temporary berms such as BO B/CID Review of plans A/C 214 sandbags or gravel dikes must be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. .. During construction, to remove pollutants, street BO B/C/D Review of plans A!C 2/4 cleaning will be performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to c ontrol dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from the site. The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in CE B/CID Review of pians A/C 214 the Water Quality Management Plan prepared by Green Tree Environmental Management on August 1,2006,to reduce pollutants after construction entering the storm drain system to the maximum extent practical. V A 6of8 Landscaping plans shall include provisions for BO B/C/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 controlling and minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides. Landscaped areas shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of Grading Permits. Rooftop run-off shall be captured in the adjacent PD B Review of plans C 2 r landscaped yard areas, which will then infiltrate the run off, thus decreasing the site run-off. Prior to issuance of Building Permits,the applicant shall CE BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 submit to the City Engineer for approval of a Water Quality Management Plan (WOMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices p (BMPs)that will be used on-site to reduce pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and to non-structural measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June 2004. Prior to issuance of Grading or Paving Permits, BO BIC/D Review of plans AIC 2/4 applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent(NOI)to comply with obtaining coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. Noise Construction or grading shall not take place between the BO C During A 4 hours of 13:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a Cn national holiday. 7of8 Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the BO C During A 4 standards specified in Development Code Section construction 17,02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120, Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours- however, it noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with above noise standards or halted. The perimeter block wall shall be constructed as early PD C During A A as possible in the first phase. construction p Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the PO/60 C During A 4a hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, construction including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a LID national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks used for ^' hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and from the construction site),then the developer shall prepare a noise mitigation plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes. To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. r—, Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD-Community Development Director or designee A-With Each New Development A-On-site Inspection 1 -Withhold Recordation of Final Map PD Planning Director or designee B-Prior To Construction B-Other Agency Permit/Approval 2-Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE-City Engineer or designee C-Throughout Construction C-Plan Check 3-Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO-Building Official or designe( D-On Completion D-Separate Submittal(Reports/Studies/Plans) 4-Stop Work Order PO Police Captain or designee B-Operating 5-Retain Deposit or Bonds FC-Fire Chief or designee 6-Revoke CUP 7-Citation V 8 of 8 16's t : R;� , - COMMUNITY, _DEVELOPMENT r � DEPARTMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT#: SUBTT18210 SUBJECT: 7 LOT TRACT MAP APPLICANT: MARK ALLISON LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET BETWEEN ETIWANDA AVENUE AND GREENWOOD PLACE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2750, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. General Requirements Completion Oate 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents,officers,or employees,because of the issuance of such approval,or in the alternative,to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may,at its sole discretion,participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Reso'ution of Approval No. 07-12, Standard Conditions, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed EngineerlArchitect. 3. The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fees as shown below. The l l project}Manner will confirm which fees apply to this pro)ect. All checks are to be made pay&e to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to the Planning Commission or Planning Director hearing: a) Notice of Exemption -850: b) Notice of Determination -$50: c) Negative Declaration- 8 1,850 X d) Environmental Impact Report- 82,550: SC-1-05 1 1 TLANNINGTINALTLNGCOMM12007 Res&Stf Rpr,SU5TT18214StdCord 3-28.dx 177 D1-Pg93 Completion Date B. Time Limits R 1. This tentative tract map shaI expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete fina'map is filed with the City Engineer with'n 3 years from the date of the approval. C. Site Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, Development Code regulations and the Etitivanda Specif,c Plan. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon,all Conditions of Approval shall be competed to the satisfaction of the Planrnng Director. 3. Revised site plans and all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Plann ng Director review —1_ f and approval prior to the issuance of bui:ding permits. 4_ All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shalt be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading. tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.)or prior to final reap approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision,or approved use has commenced,whichever comes first. 5. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code,all other appticab!e City Ordinances, and app'icable Community or Specific Plans in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 6. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, bermtng, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director_ For single-family residential developments,transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 7. Street names shall be submitted for Pianning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 8- A detailed plan indicating trai widths,maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control,it accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, inc`uding fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. a. Local Feeder Trails (i.e., private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced �a+ with two-rail,4-inch lodgepole"peeler" logs to define both sides of the easement;however, developer may upgrade to an alternate fence material. b, Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs. C. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5% at the downstream end of a trail for a _! _ distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot corral area in the rear yard. Grade access from corral to trait with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a min.mum width of 10 feet, 2 l'-PLANNINGSFINAI�-.P!-NGCOMM12007 ries&Stf Rpt'tSUBTT18210SWCond 3.28 doc 178 D1–Pg94 Completion Date 9. All parkways, open Cs, and landscaping shall be permanently( .ntained by t*le property _l,l owner,homeowners'association,or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of Wis andscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and City Eng,neer review and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and City Engineer approval; including, but not limited to, public notice A T requirements, special street posting,phone,isting for community concerns,hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 11. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall _ll condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail,all cont'guous property owner at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/ fences along the project's perimeter. 12. Construct bock walls between homes(i.e.,along interiorside and rear property lines),rather than _l�l wood fencing for permanence,durability, and design consistency. 13. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 14. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. �l^I 15. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and s'dewalk. The / 1 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. The parkway landscaping including trees,shrubs,ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. D. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and mode;home landscaping in the case of residentia development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of bui€ding permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. 2. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope,but less than 2:1 slope, shall be,at minimum,irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 3. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq.f1.of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq.ft, of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In add"tion,slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 4. Far single-family residential development,all slope planting and irrigation shaft be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each ind.vidual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units,an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 3 1APLANNINGTINALTLNGCOMNt12007 R8$&Stf RPt1SUBTT18210StdCord 3-28.doc 179 D1--Pg95 comdetion oats 5_ Front yard and corn Je yard landscaping and irrigation shall be ,fired per the Development Code_ 6. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed withip the pub;ic right-of-way on the _I1 perimeter of this project area shalt be continuously maintained by the developer_ 7. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in pub+Ic maintenance areas,the 1 1. design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Department. 8. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required at a ratio of 50 linear feet per acre. The size,spac'!ng, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall comply with the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (RCMC 19.08.100). APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT,(909)477-2710, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: NOTE: ANY REVISIONS MAY VOID THESE REQUIREMENTS AND NECESSITATE ADDITIONAL REVIEW(S) E. General Requirements 1. Submit five complete sets of plans including the fottowing: _{ { a. Site{Plot Plan; b_ Foundation Plan; C. Floor Plan; d. Ceiling and Roof Framing Plan; e. Electrical Pians (2 sets,detached) including the size of the main switch, number and S`ze of service entrance conductors, panel schedules,and single line d-agrams; I t. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground dograms,water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning;and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBT718210)clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations,energy conservation calculatiorps,and a soi's report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and 'wet" signature are required prior to p'an check submittal. 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers'Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Sepa•ate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. { F. Site Development 4 1. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction, All plans shall be marked with the project file number (i.e., SUBTT18210). The applicant shall comply with the ',atest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes,ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Bu'.lding and Safety Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. 2. Pr;or to issuance of building permits for a new residential project or majo�addition,the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include,but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee,Transportation Development Fee, Permit and 4 1'.PLANNINGIFINALkPLNGCOMM?007 Rcs&Stf Rpt',SUBTT18210S11dCond 3-28.doc 180 D 1—Pg96 Comolet-on Datn Plan Check Fees,Cf.—.ruction and Demolition Divers�on Program josit and fees and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of tie school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Department prior to permit issuance_ 3. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building and Safety Official after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of buiiding permits. 4. Construction activity shall not occur between the hou-s of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. G. New Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Ca4-tornia Building Code (CBG) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness. 2. Provide compliance with the Ca ifornia Building Code for required occupancy separations. 3. Provide draft stops in attic areas_ not to exceed 3,000 square feet, in accordance with CBC Section 1505. 4. Exterior walls shall be constructed of the required fire rating in accordance with CSC Table 5-A 5. Openings in exterior walls shall be protected in accordance with CBC Table 5-A. 1 1 H. Grading 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with California Building Code,City Grading _/ 1 Standards, and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved grading plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to �1_I perform such work. 3. A geological report shal+. be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the 1_I� time of application for grad.-ng plan check. 4. The final grading plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate grading plan check submittal is requ;.red for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The grading plan shall be prepared,stamped, and signed by a California registered Civil Engineer. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, (909) 477-2740, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: i. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails,public paseos, public landscape areas,street trees,traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 5 I%PLANNING,.FINALIPLNGC0MM12007 Res&Stf Rp1\SUBTT18210StdCond 3.28.dec 181 D1-Pg97 CGmolehon Date 2. Dedication shad be m( of the followir•g rights-of-way on the perim( streets(measured from street centerline): As needed total feet on Banyan Street 3- Corner property"ne cutoffs shalt be dedicated per City Standards. 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map_ 5. All existing easements ly-ing within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the _h1� final map. J. Street Improvements 1. All public improvements(interior streets,drainage facitties,community trails,paseos,landscaped/ areas, etc.) shown on the plans and.-or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements sha?:include,but are not limited to,curb and gutter.AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks.street lights, and street trees. 2_ Pursuant to City Council Resolution No,88-557,no person shall make connections from a source of energy,fuel or power to any burlding service equipment which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and al,other codes,regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council,except:that in developments containing more than one building or unit,the development may have energy connections made to a percentage of those buildings, or units proportionate to the completion of improvements as required by conditions of approval of development_ In no case shat more than 95 percent of the buildings or units be connected to energy prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of approval of development. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including. but not limited to., Curb& A.C. Side- Drive Street Street Comm Median Bike Street Name Gutter Pvmt walk Appr. Lights Trees Trail Island Trail I other Banyan Street X X X X X "A" Street X X X X X X Notes: (a) Median island includes iandscap:ng and 'irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during pFan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked,an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 4. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans,including street trees,street lights,and intersection safety lights , on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Enginear. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements,prior to frnal map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. b_ Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 6 1:1PLANNiNG'%FINAL'..PLNGCOMM12007 Res 8 Stf Rpt',SUBTT18210StdCond 3-2t}doc 182 D1—Pg98 Comoletion Date ^. Pavement strilf ,,marking,traffic sign ng,street name sign traffic Signa:conduit,and / 1 Interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Eng'neer. d, Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be insta;led with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Puli boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the C;ty Engineer Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No.6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets,a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shal' be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Handicapped access ramps shall be installed on al' corners of intersections per City _/ 1 Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving,which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows sha'I not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be / 1 installed to City Standards, except for single family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Director prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 6. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed / 1` legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on sheet---(typically sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. The City Engineer reserves the right to adjust tree species based upon field conditions and other variables. For additional information, contact the Project Engineer. Min. Grow Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Space Spacing Size qty. Banyan Street Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle 3' 20'O.C. 24" "Muskogee" Hybrid—Lavender box "A" Street Select appropriate tree from the approved street tree list for Rancho Cucamonga Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting,an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Department, 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 7 '.,PIANNING'.FINALIPLNGCOMM12007 Res&SO Rpt1SUBTT18210StdCond 3-28.doc 183 D1—Pg99 Com lotion Dale 7_ Intersection tine of si ,esirs shalt be reviewed by the City En r for conformance with adopted po'icy- On collector or larger streets, :'nes of s ght shall be plotted for all project intersections. including d{iveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight potted as required. K. Public Maintenance Areas 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigat!Jon plans per Engineering Publ*c Works Standards shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approvai prior to final map approva:or issuance of bui ding permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways,medians, paseos, easements, Valls or other areas shall be an-lexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: Banyan Street. 2_ A signed consent and waiver form to join andlor form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting _!_! Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer pr:o-to final map approval or issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. L. Drainage and Flood Control 1. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map __J approval or the issuance of building permits,whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 2. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the _! { property from adjacent areas. M. Utilities 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system,water,gas, l�J electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shat'be provided as required. 2_ The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary_ 3. Water and sewer plans shalt be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the �1_{_ Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District,and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVW D is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits,whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 4. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcet map wil be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. N. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional,and Master Plan Drainage Fees shaft be paid prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 2. A non-refundable deposit shalt be paid to the City,covering the estimated operating costs for all �1� new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance if no map is involved. 8 ".PLANNfNG-.FINALIPLNGCOtilM12007 Res&SO Rpt`SUS T18210SWCond 3-28 doc 184 D1—Pg100 Com let:on Date 3. Prior to the issuance gilding permits,a Diversion Deposit and rel administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 500a of all wastes generated during construct-on and demolition are diverted from landfills,and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Form CD-1 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department when the first building permit application is submitted to Building and Safety. Form CD-2 shall be submitted to the Engineering Department within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demol tion project. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE FIRE SAFETY DEPARTMENT, FIRE PROTECTION PLANNING SERVICES AT, (909) 477-2770, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SEE ATTACHED I:IPE.ANNINGIFINAL-,PLNGCOMM12007 Res&5tf Rp1'1.SUBTT182105tdCond 3.28.doe 185 D1—Pg101 • ,,,y; R( .cho Cucamonga Fire otection District Fire Construction Services STANDARD CONDITIONS September 6, 2006 Assets Rising, LLC S?S of Banyan WIO Etiwanda SUBTT18210 THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT. FSC-1 Public and Private Water Supply 1. Design guidelines for Fire Hydrants: The following provides design guidelines for the spacing and location of fire hydrants: a. The maximum distance between fire hydrants in single-family residential projects is 500-feet. No portion of the exterior wall facing the addressed street shall be more than 250-feet from an approved fire hydrant. For cul-de-sacs, the distance shall not exceed 200-feet, b. Fire hydrants are to be located. The preferred locations for fire hydrants are: 1) At the entrance(s) to a commercial, industrial or residential project from the public roadways. At intersections. On the right side of the street, whenever practical and possible_ iv) As required by the Fire Safety Division to meet operational needs of the Fire District. V) A minimum of forty-feet (40) from any building- FSC-2 Fire Flow 1. The required fire flow for this project will be calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residua$ pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with Fire Code Appendix III-A, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinances. 2. Public fire hydrants located within a 500-foot radius of the proposed project may be used to provide the required fire flow subject to Fire District review and approval. Private fire hydrants on adjacent property shall not be used to provide required fire flow. 3. Firewater plans are required for all projects that must extend the existing water supply to or onto the site. Building permits will not be issued until fire protection water plans are approved. 186 D1—Pg102 4. On all site plans jam` -� submitted for review, slow all fire l_" ants located within 600-feet of the proposed ,_,act site. Chronological Summary of RCFPD Standard Conditions PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS -- Please complete the following prior to the issuance of any building permits: PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY OR FINAL INSPECTION — Please complete the following: 1. Hydrant Markers: All fire hydrants shall have a blue reflective pavement marker indicating the fire hydrant location on the street or driveway in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Standard Plan 134, "Installation of Reflective Hydrant Markers". On private property, the markers shall be installed at the centerline of the fire access road, at each hydrant location. 2. Address: Prior to the granting of occupancy, single-family dwellings shall post the address with minimum 4-inch numbers on a contrasting background. The numbers shall be internally or externally illuminated during periods of darkness. The numbers shall be visible from the street. When building setback from the public roadway exceeds 100-feet, additional 4-inch numbers shall be displayed at the property entry. 187 D1—Pg103 x C - t City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION The following Mitigated Negative Declaration is being circulated for public review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act Section 21091 and 21092 of the Public Resources Code. Project Pile No.: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18210 Public Review Period Closes: March 28, 2007 Project Name: Project Applicant: Mark Allison Project Location (also see attached map): Located on the south side of Banyan Street and Etiwanda Avenue and Greenwood Place—APN'. 0225-171-01. Project Description: A request to subdivide 4.89 acres into 7 lots for the purpose of developing single-family homes in the Very Low Residential zoning district. FINDING This is to advise that the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as the lead agency,has conducted an Initial Study to determine if the project may have a significant effect on the environment and is proposing this Mitigated Negative Declaration based upon the following finding. The Initial Study identified potentially significant effects but: (1) Revisions in the project plans or proposals made or agreed to by the applicant before this proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was released for public review would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) There is no substantial evidence before the agency that the project, as revised, may have a significant effect on the environment. If adopted,the Mitigated Negative Declaration means that an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. The factual and analytical basis for this finding is included in the attached Initial Study. The project file and all related documents are available for review at the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department at 10500 Civic Center Drive (909) 477-2750 or Fax (909) 477- 2847. NOTICE The public is invited to comment on the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration during the review period. March 28. 2007 Date of Determination Adopted By 188 D1—Pg104 RESOLUTION NO. 17-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A 1-YEAR TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00028 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 18210 FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 7 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SU BTT18210) ON 4.89 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW(VL) DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET BETWEEN GREENWOOD PLACE AND LAUREL BLOSSOM PLACE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-171-04 A. Recitals. 1. Andreasen Engineering. Inc. filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map 18210, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application_" 2. On March 28, 2007, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 07-12, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. A State allowed extension(per SB 1185)extended the approval period 1-year to March 28, 2011. 4. A State allowed extension (per AB 333)extended the approval period 2-years to March 28, 2013, 5. A State allowed extension(perAB 208)extended the approval period 2-years to March 28, 2015. 6. A State allowed extension (perAB 116)extended the approval period 2-years to March 28, 2017; 7. On February 22, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 8. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows, 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on February 22, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: IDC 3ill iIS? 189 EXHIBIT E D3—Pg105 }'LANNING COMMISSIO ,SOLUTION NO, 17-13 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00028 —ANDREASEN ENGINEERING, INC. February 22, 2017 Page 2 a. The application applies to a 4.89 acre parcel of land located on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place: and b. The subject property is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The site slopes from north to south and has two short sections of Eucalyptus windrows that run from east to west near the center of the lot and along the north property line of the site; and c The project is surrounded by single-family residential development to the south, east, and west within the Very Low (VL) District (.1-2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lots to the north of the site, across Banyan Street, are undeveloped and within the Estate Residential (ER) District (.1-1 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and a. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the Very Low (VL) District; and b. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTTi 8210 for one (1) additional year. The time extension is necessary for the applicant to prepare for the sale of the subject tentative tract map. The expiration date with approval of the subject time extension will be March 28, 2018. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, specific plans, Ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is to subdivide the property into 7 parcels of land and is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Pian; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed subdivision. The surrounding parcels to the east.west and south are developed with single-family residences, the parcels to the ncrth across Banyan Street are vacant and zoned for residential development; and c. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed project is to subdivide an existing parcel of land into 7 parcels that are of similar size and density to the surrounding parcels of land; and d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Development Code_ The proposed subdivision meets all standards outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Development Code and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City; and e. The extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions. 190 D1—P9106 PLANNING COMMISSIO ..SOLUTION NO. 17-13 TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00028--ANDREASEN ENGINEERING,}INC. February 22, 2017 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on March 28, 2007 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previ.wsly considered; or(iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 is March 28, 2018. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 07-12 and incorporated Standard Conditions in Resolution 07-12 for SUBTT16210 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2017-00028. 7. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 191 D1--Pg107 PLANNING COMMISSIO SOLUTION NO. 17-13 TIME EXTENSION DRC2011-00028 —ANDREASEN ENGINEERING;AC. February 22, 2017 Page 4 BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: 4ja K& Candyce Burnett, tecretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of February 2017, by the following vote-to-wit; AYES: COMMISSIONERS: MACIAS, MUNOZ, OAXACA, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS, NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS= FLETCHER ABSTAIN. COMMISSIONERS: NONE 192 D1—Pg108 RESOLUTION NO. 19-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00048, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 7 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SUBTT18210) ON 4.89 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW (VL) DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET BETWEEN GREENWOOD PLACE AND LAUREL BLOSSOM PLACE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0225-171-04. A. Recitals. 1. Susan Etcheberria filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 28, 2007, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 07-12, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. The State approved a time extension of approved tentative maps (SB 1185) that extended the approval period by 1-year to March 28, 2011; 4. The State approved a time extension of approved tentative maps (AB 333) that extended the approval period by 2-years to March 28, 2013; 5. The State approved a time extension of approved tentative maps (AB 208) that extended the approval period by 2-years to March 28, 2015; 6. The State approved a time extension of approved tentative maps (AB 116) that extended the approval period by 2-years to March 28, 2017; 7. On February 22, 2017, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 17-13, thereby extending the approval period by 1-year to March 28, 2018; 8. On March 14, 2018, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 18-13, thereby extending the approval period by 1-year to March 28, 2019; 9. On March 13, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 10. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, 193 D1—Pg109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 19-17 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00048 (TENTATIVE MAP SUBTT18210) SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA March 13, 2019 Page 2 Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 13, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 4.89-acre parcel of land located on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; and b. The subject property is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The project site generally slopes from north to south and has been regularly cleared of vegetation; and C. The project is surrounded by single-family residential development to the south east and west within the Very Low (VL) District (A to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lots to the north, across Banyan Street, are undeveloped and within the Estate Residential (ER) District(.1 to 1 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and d. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the Very Low(VL) District and the Equestrian Overlay District; and e. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 for one (1) additional year. The time extension is necessary to provide the applicant time to sell the project site. The expiration date with the approval of Time Extension DRC2019- 00048 will be March 28, 2020. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved subdivision is consistent with the City's current General Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Equestrian Overlay District, Ordinances,plans, codes, and policies. The approved project is for the subdivision of 4.89 acres of land for the future development of 7 single-family residences. The approved subdivision is consistent with each of the related City requirements for the project site; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the previously approved subdivision. The project site is well suited for the approved subdivision as there is similar residential development to the east, west and south and vacant residentially zoned property to the north; and C. The previously approved subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. An initial study was prepared for the original project that was approved by the Planning Commission on March 28, 2007, along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which reviewed potential environmental impacts created by the subdivision of the project site into 7 residential lots. Mitigation measures were included in the original approval reducing any potential impact to less than significant; and 194 D1—Pg110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 19-17 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00048 (TENTATIVE MAP SUBTT18210) SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA March 13, 2019 Page 3 d. The previously approved subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The previously approved subdivision complies all development standards outlined in the Development Code, the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District for the development of single-family residences within the Very Low (VL) District; and e. The time extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions of tentative maps. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on March 28, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts, or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration.The application is for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. To assure that no nesting birds have inhabited the site since the original CEQA determination, staff has added a Condition of Approval to the Resolution of Approval requiring that the applicant submit a nesting bird survey 30 days prior to earth moving activity. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of a one (1) year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a one (1) year time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 is March 28, 2020. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 07-12 and the Standard 195 D1—Pg 111 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 19-17 TIME EXTENSION DRC2019-00048 (TENTATIVE MAP SUBTT18210) SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA March 13, 2019 Page 4 Conditions incorporated in Resolution 07-12 for SUBTT18210 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2019-00048.The approval of time extension DRC2019-00048 is also subject to the attached Standard Conditions incorporated herein by this reference as well as the Standard Conditions included with Time Extension DRC2018-00054 (Resolution of Approval No. 18-13). The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF MARCH 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST= Candyce Burnett, Secretary I. Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of March 2019, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS= NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS- 196 D1—Pg112 Conditions of Approval RANCHO CucuMaxce Community Development Department Project M DRC2019-00048 Project Name: EDR-Tract 18210 Location: 12765 BANYAN ST-022517104-0000 Project Type: Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning.Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Submit a pre-construction clearance survey within 3 days of the start of any ground disturbing activities to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during construction. The biologist conducting the clearance survey should document a negative survey with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is discovered during the pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities should stay outside of a no-disturbance buffer. The size of the no-disturbance buffer (generally 300 feet for migratory and non-migratory song birds and 500 feet for raptors and special-status species) will be determined by a wildlife biologist, in coordination with CDFW and will depend on the level of noise and/or surrounding disturbances, line of sight between the nest and the construction activity, ambient noise, an topographical barriers. These factors will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis when developing buffer distances. Limits of construction to avoid an active nest will be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers; and construction personnel will be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas. A biological monitor should be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor the active next to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activity. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise be Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet seated/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 5. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. Printed=30512079 www,QtyofRC,us 197 D1—Pg 113 Project#: DRC2019-00048 Project Name: EDR-Tract 18210 Location: 12765 BANYAN ST-022517104-0000 Project Type: Time Extension ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. Printed:31512019 www_CityoiRC,us Page 2 of 2 198 D1—Pg114 RESOLUTION NO. 20-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 7 LOT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (SUBTT18210) ON 4.89 ACRES OF LAND IN THE VERY LOW (VL) DISTRICT (1-2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BANYAN STREET BETWEEN GREENWOOD PLACE AND LAUREL BLOSSOM PLACE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-171-04. A. Recitals. 1. Susan Etcheberria filed an application for the extension of the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 28, 2007, the Commission adopted Resolution No. 07-12, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. The State approved a time extension of approved tentative maps (SB 1185) that extended the approval period by 1-year to March 28, 2011; 4. The State approved a time extension of approved tentative maps (AB 333) that extended the approval period by 2-years to March 28, 2013; 5. The State approved a time extension of approved tentative maps (AB 208) that extended the approval period by 2-years to March 28, 2015; 6. The State approved a time extension of approved tentative maps (AB 116) that extended the approval period by 2-years to March 28, 2017; 7. On February 22, 2017, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 17-13, thereby extending the approval period by 1-year to March 28, 2018; 8. On March 14, 2018, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 18-13, thereby extending the approval period by 1-year to March 28, 2019; 9. On March 13, 2019, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 19-17, thereby extending the approval period by 1-year to March 28, 2020; 10. On April 22, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 11. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning 199 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 20-21 TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120 (TENTATIVE MAP SUBTT18210) SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA April 22, 2020 Page 2 Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 22, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 4.89-acre parcel of land located on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; and b. The subject property is within the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The project site generally slopes from north to south and has been regularly cleared of vegetation; and C. The project is surrounded by single-family residential development to the southeast and west within the Very Low (VL) District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lots to the north, across Banyan Street, are undeveloped and within the Estate Residential (ER) District (.1 to 1 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and d. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the Very Low(VL) District and the Equestrian Overlay District; and e. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 for one (1)additional year. The time extension is necessary to provide the applicant time to sell the project site. The expiration date with the approval of Time Extension DRC2020- 00120 will be March 28, 2021. The subject tentative map will be eligible for one additional time extension with approval of this time extension. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved subdivision is consistent with the City's current General Plan, Etiwanda Specific Plan, Equestrian Overlay District, Ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The approved project is for the subdivision of 4.89 acres of land for the future development of 7 single-family residences. The approved subdivision is consistent with each of the related City requirements for the project site; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the previously approved subdivision. The project site is well suited for the approved subdivision as there is similar residential development to the east, west and south and vacant residentially zoned property to the north; and C. The previously approved subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. An initial study was prepared for the original project 200 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 20-21 TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120 (TENTATIVE MAP SUBTT18210) SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA April 22, 2020 Page 3 that was approved by the Planning Commission on March 28, 2007, along with a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which reviewed potential environmental impacts created by the subdivision of the project site into 7 residential lots. Mitigation measures were included in the original approval reducing any potential impact to less than significant; and d. The previously approved subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The previously approved subdivision complies all development standards outlined in the Development Code, the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District for the development of single-family residences within the Very Low (VL) District; and e. The time extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions of tentative maps. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on March 28, 2007, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicate new or more severe environmental impacts, or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. The application is for a one (1)year time extension of a previously approved tentative tract map with no proposed changes to the scope of the original approval. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of a one (1) year time extension for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a one (1) year time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210 is March 28, 2021. 201 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 20-21 TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120 (TENTATIVE MAP SUBTT18210) SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA April 22, 2020 Page 4 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 07-12 and the Standard Conditions incorporated in Resolution 07-12 for SUBTT18210 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2019-00048. The approval of time extension DRC2019-00048 is also subject to the Standard Conditions included with Time Extension DRC2018-00054 and incorporated into Resolution of Approval No. 18-13. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22nd DAY OF APRIL 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April 2020, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 202 RANCHOCITY OF STAFF REPORT DATE: April 22, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095—W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — A request to allow for the first one (1) year time extension of a previously approved three (3) lot Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM19557) on 0.98 acres of land within the Low(L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street—APN: 0201-251-56. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15315 - Minor Land Divisions. RECOMMENDATION: • Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Time Extension DRC2020-00095 for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval. BACKGROUND: On May 10, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 and Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700 to subdivide the subject property into 3 lots. The house products were reviewed by the Design Review Committee on April 18, 2017. No significant issues were identified, and the Committee accepted the proposal. This Time Extension request is the first request to extend the approval period of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 for one (1) year. The original approval of SUBTPM19557 was on May 10, 2017, for a time period of 3 years. The applicant filed a time extension application on March 2, 2020, prior to the original approval of May 10, 2020 expiration date. The approvals for the subject tentative parcel map including the proposed time extension are outlined in the table below: Tentative Parcel Map 19557 Approval History Approving Approval/Extension Type Approval Approval Expiration Authority Period Date Date Planning Original Approval 3 Years 05/10/2017 05/10/2020 Commission Planning Time Extension Proposed Proposed Commission DRC2020-00095 1 Year 0412212020 0412212021 proposed 203 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095—W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS April 22, 2020 Page 2 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is a 42,150 square foot parcel in a single-family residential neighborhood located northeast of the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue at 9757 Liberty Street. The parcel has a linear dimension of approximately 334 feet from north to south and 130.99 feet from east to west. There is currently one single-family residence on the property. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Single-Family Residential Low Residential Low (L) Residential District South Single-Family Residential Low Residential Low (L) Residential District East Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District West Single-Family Residences Low ResidentialLow (L) Residential District ANALYSIS: Municipal Code Section 16.20.100 allows for time extensions for parcel maps not to exceed a period or periods of two (2) years. The application to extend SUBTPM19557 was submitted on March 2, 2020. At this time, no changes have occurred to what was previously approved, which involves the subdivision of one (1) lot into three (3) lots and the construction of three (3) new single-family residences. Staff notes that the Minor Design Review allowing the construction of the three new residences is held to a different timeline which does not expire until May 10, 2023. All lots continue to comply with the development standards applicable to the Low (L) Residential Zoning district, as described in the Development Code. A. Conformance with Development Code: Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM19557) was designed to meet or exceed all development standards applicable to subdivisions in the Low (L) Residential District. The project density is 3.1 dwelling units per acre (2-4 dwelling units per acre permitted). Required lot development standards and the provided lot statistics are as follows: Required Provided Compliant Lot 1 = 91 Feet Lot Width 65 Feet Lot 2 = 100 Feet Yes Lot 3 = 100 Feet Lot 1 = 134 Feet Lot Depth 100 Feet Lot 2 = 110 Feet Yes Lot 3 = 130.99 Feet Minimum Frontage 40 Feet 40 Feet Yes Minimum Frontage 20 Feet 20 Feet (Lots 2 and 3) Yes (Flag Lot) 204 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095—W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS April 22, 2020 Page 3 Minimum Lot Area 7,200 SF 11,492 — 17,355 SF Yes Average Lot Area 8,000 SF 14,050 SF Yes B. Public Art: Tentative Maps are exempt from providing public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. The future development of the three (3) single-family residences on the subject tentative parcel map will not be required to fulfill the public art requirement. Public Art is only required when a residential development project proposed to develop four or more dwelling units. C. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff previously determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualified under the Classes 3 and 15 exemptions under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and 15315 (Minor Subdivisions) because the project involves the construction of three (3) single-family residential homes and a subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels. It has been determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have significant effects on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to this application, the proposed tentative parcel map time extension will further the City Council's 2019 goal of enhancing our premier community status by providing an opportunity for the future development of market rate for-sale residences on the 0.98 acre infill parcel. With this time extension, the site retains the approved entitlement to subdivide the project site into 3 single-family lots, consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Time Extension Request Letter Exhibit B - Planning Commission Staff Report for SUBTPM19557 dated May 10, 2017 (with exhibits) Draft Resolution of Approval for Time Extension DRC2020-00095 205 � _- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: May 10. 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Plann INITIATED BY: Dominick Perez. Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to subdivide a parcel of 42,150 square feet into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the development of three (3) single-family residential homes within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56 Related file: Minor Design Review DRC2014- 00700. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 15 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15315) exemption, which covers resident4 subdivisions of four or fewer parcels in urbanized areas. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to develop three (3) single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 square feet within the Low Residential (L) District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 3 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15303) exemption. which covers new construction of up to three single- family residences in urbanized areas RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 and Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700 through the adoption of the attached Resolut}ons of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION A Project Density 3.1 du/acre B. Site Characteristics The project site is a 42.150 square foot parcel in a single-family residential neighborhood located northeast of the intersection of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue at 9757 Liberty Street. The dimensions of the parcel are 130.99 feet from east to west and 334 feet from north to south The site contains an unoccupied single-family Exhibit B206 E7—E8 Pgl I PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTPM19557 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 -- W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 2 residence. There are a combination of wood fences and block walls along the east, west and south perimeters of the site. Street improvements along the north end of the property consist of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway. The site is generally level with an elevation change of about 16 feet between the northwest and southeast corners of the property. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Single-Family Residence Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) Low(L) Residential District (unoccupied) North Single-Family Residences Low Residential 2-4 du/ac) Low L Residential District South Single-Family Residences Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) Low(L) Residential District Lt. Single-Family Residences Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) Low(L) Residential District West Single-Family Residences Low Residential (2-4 du/ac) Low (L) Residential District ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject property into three (3) parcels and construct one single-family house on each lot. The subdivision will result in a generally conventional lot(Lot 1)with two (2)flag lots (Lots 2 and 3) behind it (as seen from the street). The conventional lot will have an area of 11,492 square feet while the two flag lots will have areas of 13,303 square feet and 17,355 square feet (Lots 2 and 3, respectively). Per the Development Code, the Low Residential (L) District allows for a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per acre and requires a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and an average lot size of 8,000 square feet. Therefore, the subdivision is in compliance with these requirements. Lot 1 has a width of 91 feet and a depth of 134 feet. The "buildable" part of Lot 2 has a depth of 110 feet and a width of 100 feet while that of Lot 3 has a depth of 130.99 feet and a width of 100 feet. To allow vehicular and pedestrian access to Liberty Street, the flag lots will be connected to it by separate "poles", i.e. elongated sections of each lot. The poles for Lots 2 and 3 will be 20-feet wide by 110.4-feet long and 20-feet wide by 211-feet long, respectively. The required width and depth of lots within the Low Residential (L) District is 65 feet and 100 feet and the required flag lot frontage is 20 feet. The subdivision will also meet these requirements. The project also involves the construction of one, 2-story house on each lot. The floor area of the houses will range in size from 4,355 square feet (Lot 2) to 4,746 square feet (Lot 1). According to the table below, there are a total of two floor plans that will be used. All of the houses will have a three-car garage. The houses and site layout conform to the technical standards required in the Low Residential (L) District including setbacks, building height, and lot coverage. 207 E7—E8 Pg2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTPM19557 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 3 Lot No. Of Story Floor Plan 1p It Floor 2nd Floor Total LivingGarage ra � Type SF SF Area SF SF 1 2 A 2,521.74 2,225.06 4,746.80 775.20 2 2 B-1 2,488.02 1,867.17 4,355.19 720.24 3 2 B-2 2,767.52 1,975.84 1 4,743.36 720.24 The houses will also comply with the design guidelines specified within Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code, which require 360-degree architecture (Exhibit H). The architectural styles that are proposed to be used are Craftsman and Ranch. The Craftsman elevation type, which will be used on Lot 1, will have stucco-finished walls with stone veneer and horizontal siding, front porch with battered columns, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage doors and windows. The Ranch elevation type, which will be used on Lots 2 and 3, will have stucco walls with stone veneer, hor'zontal siding (Lot 3), gable accents, concrete the roofing and decorative garage'doors and Windows. I B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Vineyard Junior High at 6440 Mayberry Avenue on January 18, 2017. Several property owners from the surrounding community attended. Although none of them had any specific objections to the project, there were questions and concerns relating to the placement and design of 2-story homes, the timing of development, as well as the demolition of the existing house onsite (Exhibit J). Staff indicated to the residents that the questions and concerns addressed at the neighborhood meeting would be taken into consideration moving forward. C. Desiqn Review Committee: The Design Review Committee (Wimberly, Macias, and Smith) reviewed the proposal on April 18, 2017. (Exhibit K). No significant issues were identified and the Committee accepted the proposal as submitted. Their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval. D. Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the proposal on April 18, 2017. No significant issues were identified and their conditions have been incorporated into the Resolution of Approval E. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under Classes 3 and 15 exemptions under State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and 15315 (Minor Subdivisions) because the project involves the construction of three(3)single-family houses and a subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels, respectively. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the los E7--E8 Pg3 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTPM�19557 AND MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700-- W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 4 City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOALS ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Pian and the objectives of the Development Code. For example, the Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages the facilitation of sustainable and attractive Will development that compliments surrounding neighborhoods. This proposed residential project will complement the surrounding neighborhood as it is ca patible with the adjacent homes and ZI replace an existing abandoned single-family residende that is currently under-maintained and aesthetically has a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Furthermore, the subdivision and use are in compliance with the Development Code standards and requirements. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date no comments, other than what was discussed at the neighborhood meeting were received in response to the public hearing notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Site Utilization Map Exhibit B - Tentative Parcel Map 19557 Exhibit C - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit D - Block Wall Plan Exhibit E - Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan Exhibit F - Cut and Fill Map Exhibit G - Site Pian Exhibit H - Elevation, Floor, Roof Plans and 3-D Renderings Exhibit I - Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit J - Neighborhood Meeting Notes and Sign-In Sheets.(January 18, 2017) Exhibit K - Design Review Committee Action Comments (April 18, 2017) Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 Draft Resolution of Approval for Minor Design Review Modification DRC2014-00700 CB:DPIIs 209 E7--E8 Pg4 m CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SITE UTILIZATION MAP g s� FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557 '= 3jgg f SHEE71NGEX -••+ - -rj_ ••�-- - -__------ G1 TE A"PMC4 u,P 1561l.]------ �_s1 c•T caacErmraicrsww°•secnau ssa;ET Q 1.96 Ac. Par. 2 811 AG. 3i `" c. concE.l°.Lc .Fw w°on�e.uEnru m 00.84:.He,e , e t 2.0 300 cs weu ~} I near Pa Par. 6G g s . cs rREtw.+RrwowsnEaioaR'aunsRaR r y Q a Fn.. • _ � ' '�°� it � 4 65 '- '�r,•l i "- � ® o-T PRELFVNARY ri91.IPBMP°ETILLS O �P Oef. 3 ® r�. O 142zE5 _131 269.9 _ .ra¢ltsm— .=F-. 6 e O Rs® I O © n4!Ot TYPE F:FL°OIt NI°R°°F RIWS • °'• I - _� a19x TYPE bI:Fi.OnR N�ROOF Piaias O x . n� .■ � . u r: n e r r�1�. .l+ I �' --leeF1 j-11 etH—I - y E b ° � ° r ■ A-TS° TYPE 6t RO°R,M R°oF rows p h u. $ -N .aal TrvE.wRTxarwsTE�Evms rYFE+cS°IIIH 97ELE.m- YI ,.101 TMEFJ:WRTHLFa TE1FVaTiMis " _ r-:.�-----�.._— �-.alltEh .n 8301 TWEE-l:s°if1Nd WE91 ELEYATgr19 ' 600'R ' � 62 �� ' `i tu_,®y,�•"`� �D ® _''t3 u awns TMEa-Y unxn,aEasrEstvaT,ns m (r a V •T •_ ) : ri., ? ° I -•C a.a® TYFE sx souFHawE9T STEvaTsous ,, Par. a sF u u as T, .. -_ v :a u •�» a I 21 m 2 F p at tr T, is N e T °9c sE - - taRosuPE PLwr Cal ,9 GENERAL NOTES, e °ywsuru�°cuxennrone •' - `®�r'�1��0 1.1 AC. q +�t Q u s u a ® u assEssoRSPnRceLruu°exacnuFawnn9lraT :: 23 ^ Par. I " " R R . OWNER/APPL1CAM: ,•' `� I •° ! l'HAMPION°NEIYYESrMENr,LLC © a Q s© rO I 11Y50JEf+9ERYBL ,uRITb4 x s 194.1 A s O e t.. v wa.r�rsn Tee�"O- Tu+ls.e�e O COMACT:Ww9T.w.PE , w r- �� 01 99 92.23 Par Rs t r �" 1 . ° ° x� `S` `®s,e t a n 43 ZD xp: Sfl ' 1 '!9 to El .v fl- T p n` a-:, c O le u . ° I -Hier- a Er z QQ e s Lu I •GS1 ,®L r �1- "• - '• N ��nv E� r6 -- •� i O _ T .Oe ® G94 r wrP,csrwLE �E-�ag x n © 9 ro 6 -® 3`'O BUBTRA195V 4 DRC201s-uo7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA s< $ m sLxL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557 f s! s,-- N � �LleEmr s ��� Luna.vL � � xanAr.D•vE ���1= ; Lp+,m u vW 5 4 v$ EU oto ILE:LFNrs ZDh D2OFd-S=D A D 2' C M(2.4 TTWAC} EXi57YiD tears PN o2�2617 7s Ex 112M 4Pk o2ot2e436aaao APR 02[IF2dF£.tDDOD AR2 030YSbHboom F�(F:f'TNO rLy kalrc E%6TlY3 riES�ELRs gxQ'plr FiESLElfrS rb Lae.c1- r4[ar 1u K t[6 APk ( OZOF2EFSl-[iW0 APk Q2D12%24D000 APFL 024F2! &l-0b00 Lm,1m.-,na 2JY@ fb 2-4=A* ZOIE:M.(2-1 DIYAE.) ZOLJF:RL 12i OWAW "m fi(2-4 OWAO =Q I4.42-9 MAO 7JSE la..(2-d OWP6 I APk�F40b3b-0WD MrK..u.ue: R..as orrr r - .trYhn. `_ _ I q[eradrta�, 1rt.ar4rS d[ 3 �•.�F��+c-'��.. vnnw xo nm,w _ r LOT 2 ' a. ly t. r , i y- `, `.�tk I .,.. • • k 5� µ.Mwav[I u.i i['r[o[u�°V K fl 31 LOT 3'. _ - 131303SF._� ' ' .-..t AM�fdlbvff5 a 17,355 SF, 'APN:201-2b1S6 11L,4OTA 92 SF urcm L-4 MAO 4 (FORTHREif� ! RSfDENCUIL_ r4 >s. I _ _ ["• �w"�M10i w'� u.c�a c•ro,c4,n[na.n.LI>n ul /J�{�� _ vh i0 W IbL. I...[Suarta N RT _ ==aaaaasaa aaa--c__acxc�-_eaa aaaaa_ c=1 c= J_. L �� ___ _ - ` IV --1 arua..u.r.Rn ¢e55 woe•Ltmff V _ l ----------- [ nF b I IgA =a 7L LY - i co�M •W N a ^ FM�RIG Po3[IF71t5 YlCIS �p.,[aw°.�[[�4r DDSYN0 Rb-DAOCD) APt EM-TNFWSLIE S Va'71M FZVuV•M oNTm nF5[Ems E)4wm RESDEm5 ENGTNG CN T[ML W.52-4 11YACJ AM 020r903�4&W00 ar� -d D AP1t 02D}fi D-DCW APR D2O1-6D3-�0-ODOD Arlt azc} to "Dw ' Z r`�' �'.nr 1's*r"� - ZDxE ld.(2-4 pWAU f 7d�M L2-4 DWAf.) ZONE:FL 12+4 DLVAC) I ZOW-1 Fd 52-9 DLVAC) X16 Ir.m,u.t>v1 fDOSTM FESLENTS i N 7nW-FIL L74 MAO 1 / 1 ' ¢nee.mm. M•tiT•'�: M 61DE[Y[V`LTxErz - Lor MWf3<R ARG(51T IL Q ' w, Il.ayz LTW Lor z � sD] .-,_____—_—_—_ _ _ — _ _-- Z 4�6 11I Lu ~W V Q m — --- n z v 0 Z ,u Lij ,.�r ¢rs1..[o..-� P �^�S•nR +�.rw rlam¢ orL.,°¢o¢R..ma.n l.a 1wo rn,n�s aM.w wvp mro�i�i pii L,.r¢ rapcm1efIIa Ynl F[a,su11 w�'w,° •n [niv'Mi n P[[1b[ta[s O �'v.°ew da ta.a,YILb..}.i • [r.[Ita4 wL • ..fn oL,rtntµ�i�rs,m[w L1.na..w.loris w¢Iuru r.¢¢rO.s .mi ���5�w[5..p.tpL.IR wuas{5 �[a¢° �lM 1 1]w eow�]�nY.•°L ofYcxL Rmrms ----- neR V:1hi LOfb.Ldewr,.Lv. 10. R["[r°r[o. f/n1a w LOar 3„.d[Yr,ff]YFOs 4s1[rs Ir[€I.rs'n�' 11M1°�1XOra°sn �.uvi pr S 1. is R[1 IwIMIY SMrF1 4'JM .aSP�NtT yp., St�01�yy.,p( Mw v�Lr.,cdYw aml4rx rwvvsLs ,..was[aLnnia "'1: rss ra w1 tl0":rw.rnn��mn[L n.,[°,..R win.r�L_4v4 trnaR aL � •n`c1w.'1w.r°Lc ' Lr�arl.umr j1 u[.SLK.1 r¢1r1�L.v°,..n.s1e P1Ytal5 w•¢°[n4 PwvYs d rcscsun..S ua w.t4.[°wr 1t��lm.lyd mlvnr.aw��InrR°i mdL 1K[p�ai w -R•,oO. -sxrt[n ' m� 1.nt°Rp w[u¢.t,/ty.}ri9 Amo..x�,w wa'd'ata 1na,t(w M Brew o,..e,Lm rtLT.eLI.[Kr•.r �a 4 tltls xo - -r1aL.r�'e"�a m.a pr wt 1n fwr FwwF were rie loon h, .],�[Ll ea[°r nr¢rn'�°'�11°I wear° !u rur„'¢?nal rrnrr �o.v.1unL w°.ah.w,.sxL �r�r1m.[ie r[rP r.iw[wd.k>t[n wr v rK¢x,[11 via,ra.wiar0 w,w[� w -rOW fa[ M11¢a.r.1•rA..I6 art.in Vel 1If 6 S.a L¢M laa r[!r xf¢�a 8 SU&TPi419557 A DRC2014-DOr m �T CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $ i CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN — CROSS SECTION s� FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557 3 # owNERlAPpLICANT: BENCHMARK: LEcErvo,- f�a [,MARION ONE.11NE9TMCNT,LLC B,M.=1541. 55 1i FST SS. 11750 JERSERY ELY, ELEY.=1541.[191 RANCHO cuC uonc,L G 9173D BANYAN ST 101 yr F�.c.Ar �� SET CMTS"o ON TOP.FIRELAN HrORANT, rLwl[N.� AiiF.11[B0.Lb AVE h HIGHLAND AA, - —'tx£MA r/`. CIVIL ENGINEER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION M w BANYAN 5T _® o^[�[�er r } } }ago WYIY LAND GCSILL BEvu.. TE.I INC. PARCEL-$ N O CUC MAP NO I599.IN S I ¢ c eN n"%a TT hs Nrfuunc rut 2335 M'..A 917 L BLYo STC.1 m7yBER Or RANCHO TE OF CALIFORNIA.OF,COUNTS OF 50.N Illl1`Il - 7ZL D.90 ca 91]66 mAP REco STA IE OF Ca5 PER iEL,909-608-)118 MARIEEL MAOEO RI BOON 1C PAGE 37 OF m Q LIBERTY ST -{ i FAY:909-946-113] PaRFEL.uAPS,In THE GFrICE Of THE CODNTY 3 - I RECOROER.OF SAID COun7Y. N po ` - �r 7e�vsln_c smxr LkILN x �'?.v �w "titer: �Msle.ve M.NFf 1I. vv�le FBF BASIS OF BEARINGS- EARTFlwOAK SITE IXSIet LIBERTY TRIM 'crag cgMFR y'M 5mE[I MOST u.r�v[E BFARI ARE RASED ON THE CENTERLINE Cu7....... .]90 cY LEMON AVE �v A O1^'a nTs. OE JffERrY-STREET N 69'SS'CB"E PER rfLL.............1.075 CY - is = �[rAnw . P PARCEL MAP NO-15961'BOOK 28O PACE SNRINNAGE---290 Crt1 153 HIGHLAND AvE D 0-12 10-1x IMPORTCr _.1,075 Liuxs,rxarv�"ii w .SPECIAL NOTE' Pf�Nam[U're 7R[quANTRIES 5NERE°N ANE FOR PENND ANO BONI nr PURROSES'CNLY INE CONTRACTOR SNALL V[RIFY OuANTMES PRIOR 70 S7ARf OF GRADING LOCATIONIVICINITYMAP n .er w Lwnc xoF io scuE ela 1MR0.WpiLecF I - �[g i i euliwc --=---Isr LOT i I �� kj -� LOTPmown [ox56 :1 J.i Y_,_A-4 .f,'rmawlx�n-------------- 14F 6^ , � x 0o wlLa N _ _-- ---- Ng1 --- rta. -a secnahAA M.I.F secnoNee � scmcr�s ma � I I �o LOT 3 eFxx ANL O z a o ss r_e�I, Od 0 __-____r __------ ------------------ IIA use n0 LL1l GECTlari cc L7aA�.. Qa F U 4 .EA.x,4,.. a z¢ <N J dtuKU IA of ° °' IYYJ >Z� 0 ,s e• a eie�c:a�a: ° x.ams a raol�os twPoeEa e e -- ..J __ p Fes-•m ga P alw, aaull G° 0.re.,c g] r wl ea�r�w•L r LLL `{o 3 LOT i LOT 1 -a[I.unxc GgKL lOr2 LOT]- ov' "LOT." ,P. ]o'.w —1Ao_.----- .wL ��,p mo I.o.es LOT] uIx z.l�'+ sr rs-ems — ... rr-sm n '� � }z� rr..ee>> � n rr.eol _ a ----r N P T secnaN oa '�..c•� S SU&TPMlGW&DRC2014-o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN U FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 3g 19557 GRMHIc ScaI,E ���jFj A—Y£ a EJaS7NG RESpENTS - F_X TING n5S EN75 APR 0201-2 i)-6000 E�CL57llYG AESIDF�i75 ZONE RL(2-4-4 plllAW C APR 02U}-261-22-AC) p APAP 027K61-21-D000 F_Xl571NG FlE51DENT5 �e� ZDNE ftl.(2-4 MAC) ZONE.RL(2-4 DWAC) „ ZONAPR E,FIL 26J4�00 r � 77 71 I d'. GARAGEI GFCRAGE< ' F.F.=1609.0 f LOT 2'. 'a F.F.=1603.0 s� GARAGE I �% I — LOT 3 9! el I F.F.=1603.50 I1_ — F.F.=1605.0 s l; F.F.=1601.50 I PAD=1603.0 . I �� 00 f PAD=1601.0 a,e = �� / 14'. ' " LOT 1 la s` I Im,"� F.F.=1605.50 i r D 00 ! .I 3g=` I m PAD=1605.0 Fz .ea s D � s - - -------- ---_------ LLI .. .wacm,ax. I.a x�sa a s. I 44 ItS lr, _------ -----------I� w mm .5 U-1 LL fey 'Jdy�. Z EXISTNG FkESIDENTS tYOt RL(23 a7-oaoo £XfSMG RESIDENTS EA"NG RESIDENTS Lyj-%MG RL=5 v75 M1 'ZONE AL.(2-4 PIPAG) ( I a? U APR 02W-503-48-0006 APR 0201-503-48-0000 APIA 0261-503-48.0000 I ZONE:A1.{2-4 DUfACJ + U' - O�- C ZONE RL.(2-4 DUTAC) ZONE:RL(2-4 DWAC) i.,.- q m ILL] V A �.,73 0 A4E4 sw,u.a .Rf'.,✓Ef Y ss �C nPemVh�I nx+s u ,airs wFexa6 uru+k+.e ss� e P; suernM1e557aoRc2014-no7 m x CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .i = BLOCK WALL PLAN FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557s B. _ IA sazi Iar .r .Ir � r ger •' � �a'3� w .oar a. GARAGEAlTACEifs GARAGE F.F.=it01.0 LOT F.F.=1603.0 - LOT 3 F.F.=1603.50 ? �S: F.F.=1605.0 ' '1 F:F.=1GQ1.5Q PAD=16b3.0 r. t '` PAD=1601:0 _ r - LOT 1 �� y F.F.=1605.50 / Lj PAL)=1605:0'. 00 Al _ _ ______________w« _ 14aj Iia-� - - .. �xn .. I f 1 E�f/7 I. �•� I - • - ----__"__"__ } .:._ fi :gym 0 n n a-j a z Zq J V .•,rv.rc,.,n wov 1 W J U .j LLF -� nw.rna umss�.m L3twwc5ulE � Q PERIMETER WAt DETAIL 6: — - Int srta ou �tM wo _ r - .f•�,L t V u!GI tM04 Ma IETURr Y.__'" -- , � _ 1. � fP.fRs[.so-+. fw SM!•c4 IL.YHf W.+fl PS YP M s6Q0.L iYL SEL Pl R4I MO RfH a xw 'I um�-"u I[.x-7�Ou.•iL d 1-0'OEVa�E ALL.YL O"a Ylxe NR mw _�°ia PERWIE ER WALL DETAIL K.rwur M4 a 14.1-D'M.VLA m w&A ft.xm ftua e°„ "ter Biu la'ssssus--"'-- trxiw.0 swi fws.w[ it.S-D'�,W m R41 r0-v IBIM GAWE LIM 8 SUBTPMIGW d DRC7014-W?04 m x PRELIMINARY WQMP & SITE DRAINAGE PLAN FOR PARCEL.19557 aRAPwcswE ;�� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ! - ----------------- ...... LOT 2 } @A- Y LOT 3 m -L i {_ I _. - -. /� LOT 3 00 -•� � i 1 -� I. r#� i W 1.5 1i1LYa' ^,_ `� � /, 9 I 1E1I 1 �EmaSm J I _ II -ei�I � tl fARTL4 �- I O ' ' _— __ f \ i✓Stlpf � �- r � � — 1 s�4LIiW0+ i�J -�! � E � WO.I�EILY. 'k I 'S��PRavosEa f � 1 -'-• - . _. _ I j,. - s1oRu 1 I PRDPOSEa f�MV, r'r r ` 1 .W sloRu bRArl 'd•-d� �- ��,a •W y g � ' Yr.�%XII tt�PYxP f 1 PNOPosE�1EC�.-�. 4 W 0 RAY ImLLTER'� PROPDA4 AWER W m f' �. T_ea y Q fl n ` ZLLJ a rr 1 aLLI � j pQ.0 ` j PRELIMINARY WQMP BMP DETAILS 8 FOR PARCEL 19557 � # CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ; JF S� �s:4 L+nnuxw tmR w.LwmE rEtLl fiL•1l�rx rgEnin bpi• -1 ...-dit:11�:J}��}!97111 i1G7A y�gQyxy(.E rnypyyyyy�r q.L.. rwE[s .An CulTpcaEgnLIry7�E""TaG WiLCr¢nAuxv vldr rllw.,•:,� IrxlEe c � sa�,•.,..u.-..., r,..i w Iulu.tH ����1`�REI.wY p� ��r+.:•+:�:_ wrn9.r�,..•r�s.n r��r 1+,•rr.w.c�rrs.El�.1n ,.. _ of RGc. Ms+I I:IY �•w wq WgfL+.•.wE x5'wRKid -ir•i�ri1.H�xY1•l�r. - �I>o�,.,�•x!•�y..•�.� SIaR'vP wnlx LnxSr�rA,InR.i5[uWYrr. -� w.wyww.. w Il+w�•••nr•. Rx.;����. baR itr cEErtl[!ww- rn��wYxrrr W Ae wyr.•..,r.i: Prt5(k T fIn•5NEd MO[a „r,�.••nw.•r.•...i. �1 zSn[ftr�xL au x.'v!....vri•w�f v.t n xc L. FxEl4r (GEfGR'E PIASmil anr� Iq rpnti ,.. .nr in,.ik.n xL uuirrvvr r i - � i[Sl lxE fiAiN A•. .. .. � - ... t ,.u• .l.re x'SWb 40V➢RAiN>1 _ ] a N•uyM Lx fR FFWd�R-0 YW:kl �^ -. _ .....' ...v •"A`ufixMi•p W ft SIIe AT{y!!rW u3 fkl'.fF>•llAAW LUlL W IV IVA TVPICW.5ECTIdRn oR WFILTRATX)14 NEW •xq �rw tBoc wx rn _ V :,H w Lex[b to Ac[uxlxArz Tn• snk•r bT wiv llSREci1[at.xwwwnE+rwcE I .. i 8A4' EPaFrv.. 1Nir•EL�GM14M'i3WlY�.LCRVTESAFOLW£II Ak,M!•L RI�E�MC'�tlr.Gldi,lES Mco aRAMx4E W - -, .. - - - V J •. ,. YAw•�ueRr Wrx NGUS OM+,[R av lVfr xflA[IrE fJEBnlsi TwL9lE9 rfco9eEF xaFl4�FAw YF4e eA _ _. r - M, nuu sDG.l N M' Rv14u1 p{rvnvE LLE9kIg FTrL4�x VIk—'e G.4 AStiF.EIAG Ruryr S{xsarvn::TotyE�R TreW pqL of E�GR >f •"'* c y .t c ow w �f � - ' '••'- '.FLLTAATq �iNG IHF iLGAM •��➢ aE'r[k mREWrt}Y(Ju1FR i44NITW Alw 1®ME nWNER nN t[�f ', RFNWGL41rFWlIRE6 i1LEkFNIER.TMTEx M3AEM1ChR RFALw[E➢ [WC W3 rxi! '^ yExR I4d'EGIIWly 4kE r1EE➢ER, ' E • E 85iTxfkx W rrN rREHLrlFS _ .] . .. •!.. -- • !TCNCLNUI SIGdlrfi:' NJAIE GWNEA GM1 Wr � 11ExtxCE w'Kw[EEDEif ym•�d tREEt sL'•E'[rWG CrlF��MS YA,•iu..AYFEP PJNc TNEEf3 utva crxMxrrns�W1E cm H 10 to nJ J Q CULTEC Stormfilter T-80 '' CULTEC ' o ra aa. ¢ az z2 EL w : wl a z IF1 W 1 -- z 1 c i 7 z WW CIILTEC.-. fR t.fAl Il t:.- GLILTEGG La t dRe he•gar`5 .-4. fTA'Mp,r-IJLTE� .. a .. ., ... .. xlxfwlvxfk•A: rkt]v IT.v1i5: .. - "' _ i F drtnuY•H vl cr�nRUSnl wxw,cdkwra�� .u•. ... cvuEc cuLTEc _ r a 8 WW"tM7&DRUM c r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA E �a = CUT/FILL MAP FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 19557 te' A Sr� �HE on LOT 2 LOT 3 ## t s 1,: '; PAI) ;.Q E-0 C LOT # - CIO Lu I ...��_--__– ------_---------------._�--�----- –-- � C ----{ 1 r W { aQ a Z� U —Z au u GRAPHIC sc.a E �a�� Q wLu a na a w u -., oQWo EL ij z EARTHWORK Z V LL, V cur,., .2w CY FILL...... ....-1.075 CY c 511PoNMM.E...,,.24o CT(1527 a IMPONi........t,OlS CT F SPCC-HOLE tf W H MES 510"HEREON ME FQR PER1L'T ANO KNDM N PLpwosrS ONLY THE cowl m 9N YCPoCY oWMiLIrs PR.OR To START OT GIUo G V B SU8TPM19557 d DRD2014-X rn +YMwsG eIY[#•W IIRF 551f W,t _. _ 3 UNITS 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT 9757 LIBERTY STREETills �II M ` RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 0@_ 6 s as � $i .!w#u w•.nrrWurwa as i®a •N I I1n,RG sLSIRFi? .,., yl x4hG][aGf4ie , ,•..u,.nvw w uv nwa x•!r mot Y,-)��• mA1-]51-1t-,Rt ' r' •. 'A 6 !Rf (>-. !x. . - • ~'.F R���.4 5 f,l M4,W9�.•11.f.Fu¢o �-fa,+4..rua+mr= >m d. iii -� 1 �s -.c.r ,m rr 4.•xw,xwn e ' w A w rwilnr•wa xlxl•¢ AROA T DATA __ ,— ! - rm mslwfnoe m4. r,pr+-e ,.I ('` I ,} _ a 7Al a •. >rl Tris. ,. �^ I. I � M. 1 ` —_- _ _ �- W S IJ,Ri1m v� Ill gC rMG - �4 - ]�- I F M'Fs r.n H,,R I,nf Q.M1IIOR gyA�p,i1lVR IOIIL 1]AIII nUIQ •.e».-. I it PrI � �— � �. _i .. , - _ '(es ,),-0. fn -- Iwp e., ].�oJ ,►sin .,sS I. rm]• M 0o m I x- s. {wFJ Q ua wa.a w K.wa¢n wH°H H]R _. __ —_ �_,._._. ..n�rr1 IMW -- rr_._ M•-�-_. ... t S -. _ V W1! La Jr► lrn,mf.W;ryu� W we ti owr J �a+--oml.ws a mao DIRECTDRY fn•..i.. r... I - ♦ Aw¢ 44-11.1 l -..I �-Ix' H t).W/ul _ rt A,41pi.AW :JV. OUNi RW ri 'tea WALL I,EfiENp REFERENCE NOTES eena na.4rx rn nfn n.•.u nH4 ) 1-5lnM 9wki YxW/¢,4sG. 4�uuBf[M!iW n u Jn M� N ul•IIHSW,l Ml faI KR!.u'.I -«,ill J� Hil RIH yrn,.�MI.Y3 fMl iVw I/4 \•./ �!�[fnk.4llL dHINv �l�lints IMF I•'. ;xn.rW rW,MI(w)A KIwM•. !!IH['p� IF/1 � O l�'! ! •w. - m Fits Hq¢k �}p1pl,at#Ir ffK w41 t•! 1.R�No¢iH�I,VI lM kNX �w�fRfR Ya..':K .x, • u I .•.w et,[m kn � I M 0� wil SRE FLAII VICINITY WAP Q h H cw I(x IrtI1R I))MIF—-- U d h �Q �' G H14s4 OL 0 r uat4 s"I wnom)nu u7 W,H4ri - OQ wm u S "i n/` •nER wew � � lal L•J M1 4 ' /•i'N1C•o ' xr�.. _� .• I/i ,WLM itIQ i9• VY6X[I LR M O~O,ll' I� flu.ru wn-f•R nr v.aas[a s-n• x,ox to¢xwi .. _ ^ - wn1,sn,.I wVJ No rJr �'u wn w[icon wlnw.MI nrx.w If. I ` a J n!a.• wm m srA.r w arc .0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CO ••�!-_ — =1 Low I v µW w.1•,W cr a nt»�.e ax rR.n�AI)uA¢4l u44•n Iae+w.H4 ¢tw lei rH(% <(LI•¢R f11,H lm ITI¢�J n.;}.Iu�.I'•.f[I.ryuWRix. ]AI-]51.-56 �'r'x�� PART ELEVATION•CMU FENCE WALL AND CMU FENCE WALL ON RETAININO WALL r,).•.I- A• Q 5i8T'MA95S7 QiC201a-00700s 18 x.r,n v16d83—L3 H 11 8 1 H X 3 ep:l P O J. u d R w pp I g � oom I q - IMF& -- _ I � 13 ——— cl 11 I n'a• ,--r n•-s' rc-r Is•a• -------- -- ---� 1 ' - 1 � S T 1 --' Y • R S T - [ rs ,1 I 1 i S I ------------ I F 1 i I I I I I Ic-r pr-s L------ ----- frq' lr-r �r-s- x x m s N J A n P t O J ❑ O DEVELOPMENT PLAN PACKAGE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19557-3 LOTS oN s d 9757 LIBERTY STREET 4�Fr W&WLond Design Consultants.Inc RANCHO CUCALICNGA. CA.93737 iau l.ari.sn,i�t 2 Iw11 i0e-xle.rri Ii0111'1-*+s .tea YYPE'A'i FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS S66d 83—L3 nE. c u'-T �r-Ir la'-n• a ti - 0- I ., I t: mC�7p Z I F�� ry 4M1+00o I b ❑ R f i 4 1I { f 4 ' f 1 t T j I 1 -, - L ; O � i. Z I r I i I I 21 Y I r i 6 a t I I I I I I` I r. � I j fi II I I rr-i z m s m tr V Q' v n v 0 A ' I O I t3 J O O DEVELOPMENT PLAN PACKAGE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19557-3 LOTS Se vNp �a 9757 LIBERTY +^Ff W�LWLondDesign Cansultonls,Inc .N g M�RANCHC} CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 �� aus�'i��•u�wMsmtcWw�a uvttm� TYPE'&1':FLOOR AND ROOF PLANS �zz 916d 83—L3 T 0 IS'-Y .75-tt le'-It• O Ll A tl 9 b �Ibbii I .c. I i i -- --F q. O � I� 1:11]71 5'-D'. 1':p• IY-o• a�� � 1 'E P.iS I L_��" I K'w;. I I L------� Y s• s p h I E -1 it J. 6 � I b c 0 I v iC 1 O / q y E-1 I I � E i s Y i i I 1 I 1 i I 1 I I I I 1 I E-1 Zi'-I• pl4f• zS an s e N 0 A I 4 O J 4 O DEVELOPMENT PLAN PACKAGE a' TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP li 9557-3 LOTS f� 9757 LIBERTY STREET W�LWLond QesSgn Consultonfs,Inc = e Land u. W;§ • RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91737 F' TYPE'&Z'(FLOOR ANO ROOF PLANS t��s(coq�eca-nye sn(yca7 cw-usv REFERENCE ROTES _ S Qi fuss w ima lc.fur-T w nes a O txu ano9EE wa,nus sw+�x a FAEm OR f4 m ESi-1900.M0]i: .+- ®apm Ia A SRU W.P9K Pun mEac aW4 E0WPG5 E(ig9a 3�e 1 Qa .�Pa Pmac t Prn. d'51 m T.O. RIRGE OF _--__--------_----------_.----------------- O YOW SUi9,amc 1FIn.RIME!ANM. .J•�n - oYIXY fum E9.YQ5 fL1a390 q OI W im{ -.P---kD. $ mwx aaa.EAr�OeM'80 �S�a J 3 �{ m nw-w Ea I,=Kw eY ��P K ISFVNiE[o,PRIME t Plait. fONk MW[Ono05 A[GEaCY FlSaii OES]]9 -------T_0_PLATE 0 u wew•sntc9 Huai awn Hou. moa swosiaa Ps pi 5 iml 2 9 0 N 4D pw KKR v lmu9.00 scar. Ru9f awz,.ELEl k C? caox awl fowms u.xo k T.O. JOIST �9RGLaR w9a cwwlo.„nH.mo Posl, a • axat oad fMNa05 oe.�. TYP. g q s $ 7 7 I TYP. QQ ma rm 1E�Pram owa u r-n•d lion uan cwxc maa er xiu T.O: SLAB a au¢ao man.cuwucE x u E v Enux -- -- sans si9ols�m KW In allx.siocaiw 11 8 venE sway�tax anc w� .. �N.h fl6EaEwl vRaoe���auw¢ NORTH ELEVATION moe,anw fVait@-XE raow MUM m V rn 00 in V 4 O ,—� � 12 F I 2 0L0 fL T0: PLATE. �� n tl --------------------------- 9 7 n a QJ U z ILL U m 10 T.O. JOIST O Q~m U C 16 $ l 9 ..$ LI�rU W i 1 O >Zinz � o�mrc ., T_0._SLAB TV. g EAST ELEVATION _ M A-3.01 Q i o TYPE'A'e ELEVATIONS - SCALE 114'7x1'•0' IJgTPM19557 &DRC2014-p0700 p REFERENCE NOTES Oi Cb5'F a10rIIx MI fMR[1F POOF fU§ b 9r TMaL NOOrr.G;gc•A,f+NS AuwsE o Sy VE T m EO CSi-1904 AR55p$f, n 3: Q rpap ruEb a muk ux.xwE k Pua ��g" tiiart pu.�[mums oe.�1a 4 �' puxwip�n os Wim. .n d' 1 - - - - - - -°--- --------- - - - - m� giXE �P=,.��«,.xaE k Px�f. o ,F mlpapkk EmkUi PEA]BO n 1 3 10 ©row wumc.Pxxrta �u g [ .. 28 A cE,p+VnEEp:x'.E B PwT, 7 COLq!EANN[DNNffi Ma— T.G. PLATE QiKYT 0PATE u baa.snkm w.»so)b rwc 100. m s nj F O r�pEkf id PWkER Plb[k PAMt � � M C0.pR d.WX CpnAmS O[51ld6: k d 7.04J0�5T' fa .Pa�,v wu owapui Ir[w rope mst. -- PnIQ k PFxr. [� 1f bOCU[xlkl Yp00. \ % � Y b -i �I O NI5L gpvq 0011¢Vilx iEVPCkrn Op'4 f1 T-Y x ImY Qw ppm gr tx{ M plcarw OOLIK;-fMRuQ aaSE 1p[EF[t491 T.0_SLAH. yr Es afm�im.�a In rnx sf fepul5 8 16 12 7 F4 rIm alokc•rmox 1mf ovu Cum4 m Pxn u41n+=.,apb.p«puu-_auw4 Q p�Pt�/bpm rlm4o 1rrt�eo cawun.AnQe SOUTH ELEVATION Pae a ��PEw RE 5 m M 00 00 T.O. RIDGE 0 3 i M — r � 6 y co `� U� n '�°` d¢ 4U w J T.D. JOIST J Q n 2 2n ©00000 000000 000000 � W TYP. 5 ODLQDO 110011100110D0� �� 000000 Q� ic 0 ❑ODD0T l � T.O. aZ_SLAB W r u z - W w r< prm[e 13 8 15 12 16 � N WEST ELEVATION sim worm b: A-3.02 TYPE'A'[ELEVATIONS SCALE;114"+1.6- SUB7PIU79557.&UftC2614-00700 sn.� REFERENCE NOTES Q wss.m>c rur tarnFa RrR rus � � ar vat Ilemx•,�aur.F+xsr s[Mrt 9 �t: PiH6F D•[0.fsa-19m.PIQS@l. — O�0 rx$x A 0040 EM.L Ft QRUP PNS F0HNm5 ental oE1N SIVE �!ae � -------------------- WMPIPANY H Qi .oto raNysurs,Pwx!rMwr. •5 7 T 0_RIOGE rnu[mH toxHms intro vara sttE OHWO Oy PL RHO:kiw yF 3 [r00R mllrl ILNrx00 UMI MI.=9 R 1 r O 11 IT IT 11 11�T 1111 IT 11 IT IT IF MIR[)—t9FYR�5 0 ,MW mx T-0_PRATE p R N Ru snua ren mm Rmf. FOrad➢'1 m61]x tt� V P P If F4' P 9 15 `0 0 L mexa'SWO Mx 20/M R 7. M.rmr N 4 ss rbs Imo r r m olo Fin[rltn t tlmaz no[: - N �Icwrlrs,uaox 5 9 9 s s ---T.p. JOIST 1xay.Iv HIr Pv c a F r r [dlll Gaal ttdx00 0Fg5t 4q[m tq1(UZI H F u Nxmsxi rnr oulmuu wrx xoao Bost, a 1'1 y f h 9 4 omno-lOorMH�[tfIMM PE01 IRU=NC. P r P P o 6 -- _ — (D Nao FMW opal[ T.O. SLAB Qp°'4 oos.N rz aw __— — — I O Y-p'H 4LNy11 t/PJGF aOPr 8r SHA 11 6 8 6 ��pW s m rins.NH iow CO[[R 91.4H Iv.K aEm BuxrR rleN50x Q xnt start f.moH.m ow.ruuc NORTH ELEVATION Oma^x I R [JR[Jxmp raaFrtrl M«6Nx6136 a[FA 1 PYH_ 1>rLtR OHNr f0xHm5 0[ rvf(plla Slw m rT g xNl[[nwr sNaaart P-T o e e V mRc On+[0rup5 x[arn aRw ass» Oxrp rimlUl RIY PxVF.HD PMH[MfM Ifo Fil05 P.L W ll ASO .R 0 --,x h I T —0 9 UD 1 T_0,_RIpGE 0 J s 1 � 7.0 PLATE fn aL n Y HI I 9 - P P rP rPAll N 1 d m m IL ¢ a 10 T.O. JOIST QJ U Y Nq 4 O 2aN.a 4 Is P , = P P o0 000000 Ld P T.0 SL48 o d m CL ;Z;z 67 I4 5 13 B or� EAST ELEVATION A-3.03 TYPE'&Tt ELEVATIONS SCALEt 1f4'yri'A" U$TPM19557 do ORC2014-00700 ,ur, IkEnRENCE NOTES a 4D ass V Ceor.k n.,cwau mor,us - e. =M."'44—suu. SC w.x ns Ea.[SR-lM tttt I. (D lao rm..roan u.c Iw[.sun S- fart ratios eras,emr.svx r�/�� Inlet lW[O.YNS OCenl fiIIrt SQK ----..---_-------.--. T.O RIS Q)aRsWRPni4.Paw- �F 0.Dun IO.aR4 mm,O✓E[.will: 1 6 Q rww uupL I-M 9 5 Oil ' mtCrt a..Iwas rccn,ucr.se¢.c ��� Qi u weu•alarm r.e.Dfl/S,Harr. � / T;O. PLATE sin a.n Cmlms Hata,r�tma 15 sthin rr w.F1w, rnaz rra.nt raau ss leas[ .L p n 19 * * g s s s 9 m m ms"am isi.e a mlwo soc. 19 10 T,O.-JOIST O Queue wE�NMI�smc _ _ •_-_- --- FI tiaGlGYI aDlt O�MdIP 'a1N FOOD PDSi. 3 5 s y I6 _ _.I� 14 � tw.tos arDs,Hsu saw_o I T I O.OrO Inter DOOR fn 16 a r r ' Ca Ou aat aOrG PVR I.nr RYf9Qp Dlta txrac TA_SfAB0 r-c n a vrw ur x DDn s Y u 0.SWCW BONY,RECESSLJI P.rmlS.R.W NES.mw R P.? 17 12 7 8 Dace Du.ED..ms rcD Ds DaN CRIB u r..x aRwc.mow tww uw aa[+c Qu var slgE nlc.m.tit P.r clu.m SOUTH ELEVATION Qp anEn�a r.Pw.a mm.,s.c.Pt [apL a.11 rwiros K61SS lFt�.[Drk SNS. m 17 nS IaSSaR twit 5..I a F.OLP SdC 6! 8 Nl1. MW Pan rw.ms aEuxc ww+rcssn ham.DEAh,slim aL AUR-I,O E Nal m W 11 -X.x am mE as P.4r wat [Oa5 N.L g 1Q N rn r 3 C) J ; I hill 1 11-1 1B — — — T-a—PLATE r 1 ie 'L s 9 Q� s .. 10 I I CL _ w Q' m r°Ov 13- Q m pe N5 -_T.O.-A�ST Z V n —low(r C. i r z 5 OppT-4-5va a z r2 I I W 4 W WEST ELEVATION cn .taco to.s.m � A-3.04 TYPE'B-1'a ELEVATIONS 11BTPM19557 dE ORC2014-00700 s.,,c REFERENCE NOTES 5 S 0 aassx nwf rw m+n¢*E—n s�tvac Por W.Kt PW i+P�s suvwsE o 3F WLM aF m.ESR-190P.11iP.611 — . {id (Dram rascM m.PPiuE a r..n. coEaR oEeai EowxlPs tRwsea. ��a O wwa IAYJSUISPAMIE 8 PANT. L4CR pµy EO�aWS DIw]m.' T¢ R4 9 �o W.IDGE Q NVpO WPwGGFR PRYE [aLCR aLWN CGYa4a5 Piw390 4 a pMaWm PAMm { s _ rzEaR ouuu Ea11AW5 oEwsea. ��*a 1 4 TVP, Fa RE Tw s. u'wood mPx es S K Y[NWEEU-,P s�L I.Q. PLATE Paas C m.�R[SEwfr FaEAI — — — p u NDN,•s mw 2o/m rLw araR SMmSWtE ea IB�SE Iw]. 2 MC IC�or.E'.@f JRW.°°ER°5>wE'. QA n N - (V O'NRaaC1ll fXN!PWilElt PRA&&,w 5 TOL JDIST "--- — — a u Nwueln PaxcusaoNN�E wml wood rose. PRIME!Puxf. �aR dew fYwARs AEw.1M0. � fY �wM'SLW+G wCR wnx RwPEFEa[V+L �. r :� LfFiiv4 W T-0'k NVYNW LAVLC wdi 9N YHA TQ, SLAB omR ooA R[ccssm Puns NRH far lR[;M PFi1 A Pp awl. COIOR OlNel FEMHIS pp[w)S CWRA[WM9]11 I1 7 11 vrnE 4APwc wuVtaR Mx hlY GlA2MG. lO6 l'PIrE ww4 T--MM—LIAYNR. NORTH ELEVATION f°q a ftH�mwE.PANT IM O 1.WMD BF Y PMAi P.T M N M CWS P... V IP ]e6 ia00ER iRELLS rPNq NL r,Wl iNlx TN'0- .' m - 0 T.O. RIDGE ---------------- --------------------- s 1 < In s s � 4 N Z V a T_0;_JDIST__ T_b._PLATE a W Z o No I6 z� a y 8 =�==�� ~O EL_LEU „ DD C��LOC7C� Q m " a�x � LALL,z z a 7 14 13 EAST ELEVATION N9 A-3.05 TYPE'B.r E ELEVATIONS SCALE!lf4'cT-0' a S 0 — OBTPM19557 do ORC2014-00700 REFERENCE NOTES a [O ulss w AUYec FW[axREF[ROOF lAF9 '•' !h S�q[9prU;;ffL Fx.HR+S SUlHSE O �n O+000 F158F R ASO w;%['RUE d nRb°OwM[CIIlNS MFg0. C��a O:w p trsu/pN[S IReiE d PNM. o g4 R wpcO Unrw>,AR.�r PNM. v --—_---- — ---- T.D. RIDGE 000 oR awn EawR05 awvR J.g 10 n a 1 �£a. p IRE K[ wl_9 m nm v a33€€ YtRwnr[o'.PRPL R PwIF. oxaR:aFw wi3 FWAI.[Rrwms RF lw�mfiN oErQs 2 T,0_PiATE Q u McPN'sln[oo F caoR sumsrwc es tOl5r rMI. 9 F 6n O STOVE Kn[FR Rr T RunC INa.CtGwurER. c�.l 10 / a _� I 0° wRRuart Doti Mw^rP,pma PNwr. j, caaz pwa[Exwo6 xw.1n N k 17ARM T.Q. JOIST rR wmu nwv puRoPAM~wornsos. [aOR Ours FOrUmS OCw.110 5 6 u waoo EMW oaoR �' .. f Qu xm so�c omn wnx�Euc�ao aw T.O. SLABP R w x b-e.ow c DDDR s xxl. ' T.O. SLAB pis °a Pr s Eo w¢ Fmn ire 7 6 12 7 g IR MwE x�+a+oow wFM wu.ouFc -_ ©r°m rAscl[Nr wvm�MIH-um aNax� u minR [orAnHos na�inafl°"[i a POc.S77 SOUTH ELEVATION „ F6 wRCd[R RLW PmC M,N,MM f10 m �m135 P.xr. i 11 A6 wPaRN llgl[95 FHU[I1D PNM MSH PXI COIR PNM. m _ 00 -v to N N —T.O—RIDGE U) 0 0 18 PLATE LJ LLn o 17 ¢rn 1 ¢a d y y y y 10 a I[R 11 H u 111111 11 n ¢Wr T.O,JOIST v W F¢ o z o NF 14 z� a� � U _ y �` ❑ Y Y. f 16 O¢IDP m El ' 1-0. SLAB i uj z P � uj a Irc WEST ELEVATION A-3.66 TYPE-8-2- ELEVATIONS SCALE:114"-1O" t0 & —: REP901 MCE MOTES r: pppp%"m IA1, ••,7 7 _ ..A.wr e.n. S• _—__ �� 6 h•mx. _.air. NORTH ELEVATION •' ""°" J I �ANn .tinsswaE xeo `, arnrt- a ®vunns mai:otw sys 18 1 : 0 00 - - awnAoo srarE �' � wsrst� W Ie r Y•'k Z. ''1'`iz _— EAST ELEVATION TrPE :E�EVRrwMs REFERENCE MOTES 4 1 E 1 I l Ll , y■ _ �i N. SOUTH ELEVATION rri rr 1 ouw COMM minx:oew ssa > o _ J ti W • 1U', � m •l � I �n 7� IS R 15 l2 1G CD WEST ELEVATION A-3.02 TYPE'S a fMATKM SCAM A£F£AENCE A07ES 77-7 - NORTH ELEVATION I cxa.e.root . oz 1 o auw[owwms �. WllT:9E lfM 4 S y W Z � � `ff,°`mri 0, �r G 7 14 r14m� N EAST ELEVATION w CD _ A-3.03 TM V-1,r ELEVATION! SCALE 114ftl-4" REFERENCE NOTES - CIC1 - - i15 • v . SOUTH ELEVATION i „ Dari vare R.wsc u 'l. 3 ■ fLlax�oE Usl i 419 n e 1 d 9 wr earwms W F- ��IUr � z • mcrtn wanu.a ss _ I n ill4Rff14F I W • W N WEST ELEVATION W , - -- — -- - - - A-3.04 TYVE•B•i': ELEVATIONS _ _. .. REFERENCE NOTES ` 1 _ llt —A NORTH ELEVATION rT rl mak D9Y L0 wiw mruY®s :s � �-cex sus ` r k � ifs f j F-7- 1 m" v .. r.�G mei N EAST ELEVATION -- TYPE'B-4':ELEVATIONS - -- _-_-- -_ T" SCALE 114"=1'-0" ,• -. REFERENCE NOTES G ,,. C-1 'r �. I 6 i SOUTH ELEVATION rn { I MLAIR Hfi1S SUdLg BIBID WkY®w1AI COIQV:0EV1 S!L a _ z B � _ mina:ww sass a LJi� G LEDGE I I v; $ !1 N w WEST ELEVATION _ A-3.06 TYPE`!2':ELEVATIONS SCOLE:114'ml'- _ � ��r�t A S t•� kL� 1v-�•. ;'� �: i NO f ' � Wil. ��. •^� .. ..-`�' d .. '•.t• s�e� •#�E - ,a..-scar � .:� '�. � � �i�w rn .. - 1 • 'R, S W&W Land Design Consultants Inc. 3 UNITS 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT rchft�ctt. rml Ffts—'mg Inte—, 10T 3: TYPE 1 Wim■®■»■o■�r 0� --. �■�a■ae�e�e� �0 a • �'�. '���""ie-i-v"��Cr�Ta� ...•�wy�.��"..■�w=s"'�rr.ir '�+ ��■C�■L�iQ1©■!w'^'-^�^-'� O .. .i... '. �+...,..-:•��CS..^.�'�`..��i1,'�.�«�«a.���.� !2: 1�A�A0S0D®ems .. -�.NAM. -,�. ..�. ..�► , .�I► _.alb_ - �► ._��_ _► � �• � •� z I ��4�'i^ tG�=fir,. ■ ■ EPIDIi yir$r� LOT 1 Y � - y�I 4 cop ■ till Wei it I �`�r�'<•�rr o° AL IT LT VIEW PLANTERS oNc `irk. A* a4 ri rr , 3r' fir r< �� •''� no- ,„�d 'fir iy�i� nnip�4aenQ+S��` $ .� a*•. b ei i ° Yip�+.t�yfr�iyRt■x�ep'e■ �.4 Co h �•o ii 4< r�0'OboOd PROPERTY WALLS rlsm<r? 4yo' ♦yi' W,:str„ �14 00o a aR ��*� � �`rs'iYsrO=°1' p,7� v'v .►7s►:��� J'�O' •�. f*�•'-4' rl..o.°.eddA ''ww X444 °.' ir,<f4 �►.rri��@ c ?'fit+hearsa+atiti i+i �^� -ry� 't�1p 411 v0��, �vl�aj�a►da�aaay 'ep-■c: �joa° Yri<i�' S•r rr'' �*A -�� boo <�<.�`�r y�!r<� fjti;.�. A'p.1 Ia_fya+'ate/y��i-Iof �atya'-tS�t�aVtis afya/yail fat` td �•,��!!�Au i <?• 'fi�gfeO rr ni � <. o P R. i■.•y,0<i a h�a�� rw'riL*f��a''�✓ir.__���<r<rs p�'b ,' . :� r�•.;%.. ':r.'s3����;�R�a����91�F�a��7q���aeie•e_�s�;��r.�'�' �{•f;;yf.::� i;d.:i:rai.:t:_��.t:d.��:f4t.�rw`t r s�..aCs"�::f.:t.f:R;f'IF�4��1 � -fit;�*r,.�*r��tiM.�'�#�£e:�•�6iNr[`��. ^.-.-+-+� r'���1�.-.�'.'-`.T�+�•-�� .-T-:-r�T�roAo;1►���1+���.�y:�4�So�op'o�o'obAa �:�o�7 �; � t.�,9k3t,�►,oY1. .SGC.i9�,�i?1R ,it9I1F�®lo¢I��1�i � ss�4gti_ ="�'tla �i,�4a�g4 ®,`�1Yi191Q99 11�Iif41►�d4�l�: a►z �� �;�� � ���1`a�+!'��9rAglp�ao�if� '�i/9MQ91 W&W Land Design Consultants, InC. 2335 W. Foothill Blvd, Suite 1, Upland, CA 91786 Civil engineering, Subdivision, Land planning PH: (909) 608-7118 Fax: (909) 946-1137 January 18, 2017 Subject: Neighborhood Meeting Report Tract SUBTPM19557 & DRC2014-00700 APN: 0201-251-56 Project at 9757 Liberty St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Hosted By: W&W land Design Consultants, Inc. 2335, W. Foothill Blvd., suite 1, Upland, CA 91786 (909) 608-7118 Fax: (909) 946-1137 I Attendees: Applicant's team: Architect: Tom Lau Engineer: Winston Liu Owner Representative: Winnie Zheng Owner Representative: Neville Lin Owner Representative: Stephen Whyld Architect Assistant: Thandrai Sunitha Murthi Case Planner: Dominick Perez Public: Mrs. Frida Dotson & Mr. Dotson Mrs. Rebecca & Mr. Les Davies Mrs. Christen Ruiz and Mr. Tony A Neighborhood meeting was conducted on Wednesday, Jan 1811 2017 between 6 pm to 7pm at Vineyard Jr. High School located at 6440 Mayberry Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737. Public were informed of the neighborhood meeting by sending invitations through postal mails. Invitations were posted on Jan 511 to about 150 houses within 600' feet radius neighborhood of the project site at 9757 Liberty St, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737. Copies of the invitation and mailing list (with names and addresses) is herewith attached. The meeting was conducted in the multi-purpose room of Vineyard Junior high school in the presence of the case planner, Peter Dominick. The applicant's design team, and Engineer displayed the drawings of the proposed project at bpm. Sign-in sheets and comment sheets were provided along with handouts, note pads and pencils. Four families EXHIBIT J 238 E7-E8 Pg33 W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc. 2335 W. Foothill Blvd. Suite 1. Upland, CA 91786 Civil engineering, Subdivision, Land planning PH. (909) 608-7118 Fax: (909) 946-1137 attended the meeting. One person among them declined to disclose his name. A copy of the sign-in sheet has been attached as well. First 15 minutes, went with one on one discussion between the architect's team, public and the planner. At 6:15pm, Owner's representative, Stephen Whyld after an official introduction, presented briefing the project and opened up for open discussion. Public came up with few questions and concerns which are as enumerated below: One on one comments /discussions prior to official discussion: As discussed to the planner: • No architectural articulations on the west side of the proposed Lot 2 building. Request to see more architectural details, elements and enhancements carried around all sides of the house. Ans: Architectural design is in the process. Planner would work with the architect and work out the requests to the best. • Is it a variance? Ans: No. it is not a variance. It is a land subdivision. • Does code allow the sub division of land? Ans: Yes, the code allows for subdivision of land. • Is the proposed design adhering to the code setbacks? Yes, the setbacks are adhered as per the code requirements. • Is there a CUP? Ans: No, there is no CUP. • Request planting along west property line to screen second floor of new homes looking into backyards of the existing single story homes. Ans: Yes, landscape will be provided along the west side of the lot. Official open discussion: • The driveway of Lot 1 is very close to the backyard of the property adjacent to lot 1 on NW corner. How far is the driveway away from the existing wall and from the concerned property? Ans by Tom: Required setback is 20'. Provided a distance of 29'-6" from the wall (29'-0" from the property line). 25' for the driveway and backup and 5'-6" for landscape. • Is another wall being built? Or any other proposal on that wall? Ans by Tam: No new wall is proposed. But a 3 feet height planter wall is proposed 3' feet away from the wall giving room for planters. - 2 - 239 E7—E8 Pg34 W&W Land Design Consultants, InC. 2335 W. Foothill Blvc$, Suite 1, Upland, CA 91786 Civil engineering, Subdivision, land planning PFI (909) 608-7118 Fax: (909) 946-1137 • Building too close to his backyard and worried about windows looking straight to his back of the house. Ans by Tom: The windows in Lot 1 bedrooms are approximately 63' away from the existing fence yard wall. In total approximately 132' from his bedroom windows. Existing landscape in his property plus new landscaping with tree screening on the north side of Lot 1 will provide further privacy to the existing home. • Is there a driveway light pole? If so nuisance of light to bedrooms at the back. Ans by Tom: No, there is no light pole on the driveway, Existing street light pole to remain in the same location. • Can the light pole be relocated? If so, who will pay for the light pole relocation? Ans by Tom and Winston: Need to discuss with the city if deemed necessary. Developer will pay the cost for relocating the light pole. Per present design, the existing light pole will remain in the same location. • Who is building these houses? Are the houses built and then sold or the vice versa? Ans by Tom: The developer is building the houses and then selling them. • When is the construction likely to start? Ans by Tom and Winston: Planning process likely to take 4 months and Construction document approval another 4 months. • Do you have the approval to tear down the house? Ans by Winston: Not yet. But efforts are taken to speed up the process. • Concern of the current condition of site being an eyesore and dangerous with coyote's wandering the site. Request to tear down the existing eyesore chain link fence and build a better fence and secure the place. Ans by Tom: Will take care of the concern ASAP, • Request to start construction as soon as {possible for the site being a nuisance as regards safety and aesthetics. Ans by Winston: Looking forward to start demolition and construction once the planning department approves. • There are one story houses on the west side of the proposed two story buildings. How is the privacy issue being addressed? Ans by Tom: Yes, we are going to do landscape and mitigate any work with the city planning department. We are going to landscape on the east side of the lot as well and add more trees to address privacy. - 3 - 240 E7-E8 Pg35 W&W Land Design Consultants, InC. 2335 W. Foothill Blvd, Suite 1. Upland, CA 91786 Civil engineering. Subdivision. Land planning PH: (909) 608-7118 Fax: (909) 946-1137 • Will the public get to review the meeting comments prior to any construction process at the proposed lot? Ans by Tom and planner: A report of the neighborhood meeting will be compiled by architect and planner and the public will get to review the same. • Will public be notified of the Planning meeting. Ans by planner: yes, they will be notified of the Planning meeting. • Has the sewer design for the proposed lots taken into consideration? What is the proposal? Ans by Winston: Yes, it has been taken care. Lot 1 and Lot 2 are gravity drained to the city mains. Lot 3 sewer proposed to be pumped to the city mains by sewer pumps. • Would there be noise due to the sewer pumps? Ans by Winston: There won't be any noise as sewer pumps are going to be 8 feet below ground. A noise report analysis has already been submitted to the city for review. • An existing eucalyptus tree in the NW corner of Lot 3 was brought up for discussion. The owner. fears it falling down and requests to remove the same. Mrs. Luke had called Winston last week and had expressed this concern. Ans by Winston and Tom: Will discuss with the city and taken necessary steps. • The meeting officially ended at 6:35pm. No additional questions were asked from the attendees and guests left at 6.45pm. The architects team and planner stayed there till 7:10 pm and concluded the meeting. However, when we left at 7:10 pm and were loading the car, a couple came in late to the meeting. We gave the project handouts and contact information and asked them to call us with their concerns. If you need any additional information or have any questions, please contact our office or email us at winstonliuAww-technologies.com. Sincerely, Winston Liu, PE Principal Engineer - 4 - 241 E7-E8 Pg36 YOU ARE INVITED TO A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING You are welcome to attend a neighborhood meeting in order to address questions or comments regarding the following proposed development: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00700: A request to develop 3 single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42, 150 square feet located within the Low Residential (L) District at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201 -251 -56. Jan 18th, 2017 6:00 pm -- 7:00 pm Meeting Location: Vineyard Junior High School 6440 Mayberry Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91737 Contact Information: Owner: Champion One Investment 11750 Jersey Blvd., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Winston Liu — winstonllu@ww-technologies.com W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc. (909) 608-7118 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Dominick Perez -- Dominick.PerezQcityofrc.us (909) 477-2750 ext. 4315 242 E7-E8 Pg37 SITE LOCATION 00 E m "U . w 0 __ MEETING LOCATION N A W 5I IA - s emis NE:IC;HBORHOOD.10 EE:T1 NG DATE: 1-18-2017 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-00700 TENTATIVE PARCEL ,MAP 19557 APN:U201-251-56 9757 LIBERTY STREET,RANCHO CL'( ANIONC:A,CA 9173? PROPERTY OWN'ER'S NAME ADDRESS SIC:NA I I.RE: S16.V-IN TIME: a i a5 r6.6 1 Ht'- G S 1 a e QC_CC� eS axI'Q 5 I / z D yr + 1 mo Ya LLIA OP, � m V I I _ m 00 w I N i A A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING DATE: 1-18-2017 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2014-007UU TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19557 APN:0201-251-56 9757 LIBERTY STREET.RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91737 IPROPERTV OWNER'S:NAME COMMENTS aulA c� 5ee O�Clnl rat �t�d own tc C3-u so C, cd� --c ►mmvzc-u ,r -u rtiee O rx r I m ao tQ A a I N A CJl CITY OF CUCAMONGA APRIL 18, 2017 - 7 :00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Cali: Ray Wimberly 7:00 P.M. Rich Macias Candyce Burnett Donald Granger Alternates: Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present. Mike Smith, Senior Planner; Dominick Perez, Associate Planner; Nikki Cavazos. Assistant Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals embers of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. EXHIBIT K Page Z of 4 246 E7--E8 Pg41 APRIL 1 S, 2017 - 7:00 P.m. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS Room CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00726 - IPT ARROW ROUTE DC, LP - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 611,573 square foot industrial building on 26.63 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District on the north side of Arrow Route and west of Etiwanda Avenue - APN 0229-021-60. The Committee accepted the changes mide by the applicant and forwarded project to Planning Commission. C2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to subdivide a parcel of 42,150 square feet into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the development of three (3) single-family residential homes within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 - W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS - A request to develop three(3)single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 square feet within the Low Residential (L) District located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557. The Committee briefly discussed the project and recommended approval with no issues and forwarded project to Planning Commission. C3. DESIGN REVIEW MODIFICATION DRC2016-00338 - OWEN'S COURT ESTATES, LLC. - A request to modify Design Review DRC2014-00207 for an approved 6-lot subdivision to revise the plotting and architecture for six (6) single-family residences within the Low Residential (L) District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, on Owens Court, located on the west side of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street - APNs: 0227-842-01, -02, -03, -04, -05 and -06. Related files: Development Review DRC2014-00207 and Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16578. The Committee briefly discussed the project and recommended approval subject to staff's recommended conditions and forwarded project to Planning Commission. C4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19762 - DR NORTON - A request to subdivide 28.4 acres of land into 4 parcels in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20032 - DR HORTON-A request for a residential condominium subdivision for 380 residential units on 28.4 Page 2 of 4 247 E7—E8 P942 APRIL 18 2017 - 7;00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE acres of land in the Victoria Community Pian (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaljng 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016- 00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00450 - DR NORTON - A request for site plan and architectural review in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-00451, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM DRC2016-00451 - DR NORTON - A request for a Uniform Sign Program in the Victoria Community Plan (VCP) within the Mixed Use District related to the construction of a mixed use project consisting of 380 residential units, a 71 room hotel and two restaurant pads totaling 12,000 square feet, located at the southwest corner of Day Creek Boulevard and Base Line Road - APN: 1090-331-05. Related Files: Preliminary Review DRC2015-01102, Pre Application Review DRC2016-00142, Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19762, Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20032, Conditional Use Permit DRC2016-00449, Design Review DRC2016-00450, Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2016-00452 and Minor Exception DRC2016-00508. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. The Committee recommended approval subject to the following: Village A: For the 3 story Townhome Rowhome on all 5. 6, or 7 plea buildings and elevation schemes, additional materials and elements shall be added to the front and rear elevations that are appropriate to the Craftsman-inspired design. Materials shall include the following as appropriate: board and batten and lap siding, introducing brick, additional amounts of shingle siding, and windows appropriate to the architectural style. Village D: For all plans and architectural styles, additional materials and elements shall be added that are appropriate to each style to achieve the 360 degree architecture requirement. For the Craftsman and Shingle styles, materials shall include board and batten siding, shingle siding, brick or rock, lap siding. For the Santa Barbara and ltalianate style, materials and features shall include elements and architectural vocabulary that Page 3 of 4 248 E7—E8 Pg43 i APRIL 18, 2017 - 7:00 P.M. DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RAINS Room CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE are authentic to the style and placed on the wall plane appropriately in order to meet the 360 design requirement. In addition, the following enhancements shall be made: -Plans 1B, 9 C and 1D: Rework the locations of the 3"plaster recess to reflect each style in an authentic manner. - Plans 2A, 2B and 2D: With the exception of the first floor on Plans 2B and 2D, rework the locations of the 3"plaster recess to reflect each style in authentic manner. - Plans 3B, 3C and 3D: Rework the locations of the 3"plaster rec6ss to reflect each style in an authentic manner. All Villages: All garage doors shall be appropriate and enhance the architectural style, and generic door styles shall not be used. Linear park: The presented an updated and revised linear park design that was not part of the Committee's plan packet. The Committee found the park layout acceptable. The linear park was designed with the following features and amenities: sidewalk on two sides, two open turf areas that could be utilized for open play, soccer, badminton, and volleyball, bench seating, two shaded areas with game tables, and two bocce ball courts. D. ADJOURNMENT The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist II with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on day, Thursday, April 6, 2017, seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Jennifer Palacios Office Specialist II City of Rancho Cucamonga If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 4 of 4 249 E7--E8 Pg44 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Dominick Perez April 18, 2017 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 -W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS-A request to subdivide a parcel of 42,150 square feet into three (3) parcels in conjunction with the development of three (3) single-family residential homes within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street-APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Minor Design Review DRC2014- 00700. MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700-W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS-A request to develop three (3) single-family residential homes in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 square feet within the Low Residential (L) District located at 9757 Liberty Street-APN: 0201-251-56. Related file: Tentative Parcel.Map SUBTPM19557. Site Characteristics: The project site is a 42,150 square foot parcel in a single-family residential neighborhood located northeast of the interjection of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue at 9757 Liberty Street.The dimensions of the parcel are 130.99 feet from east to west and 334 feet from north to south. The site contains an unoccupied single-family residence. There are a combination of wood fences and block walls along the east,west and south perimeters of the site. Street improvements along the north end of the property consist of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway. The site is generally level with an elevation change of about 16 feet between the northwest and southeast corners of the property. The site is located within the Low-Residential (L) District. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west are developed with single-family homes and are also located within the Low-Residential (L) District. Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to subdivide the subject property into three (3) parcels and construct one single-family house on each lot.The subdivision will result in a generally conventional lot (Lot 1) with two (2) flag lots (Lots 2 and 3) behind it (as seen from the street). The conventional lot will have an area of 11,492 square feet while the two flag lots will have areas of 13,303 square feet and 17,355 square feet (Lots 2 and 3, respectively). Lot 1 has a width of 91 feet and a depth of 134 feet. The "buildable" part of Lot 2 has a depth of 110 feet and a width of 100 feet while that of Lot 3 has a depth of 130.99 feet and a width of 100 feet.To allow vehicular and pedestrian access to Liberty Street, the flag lots will be connected to it by separate "poles", i.e. elongated sections of each lot. The poles for Lots 2 and 3 will be 20-foot wide by 110.4-foot long and 20-foot wide by 211-foot long, respectively. The project also involves the construction of one two-story house on each lot. The floor area of the houses will range in size from 4,355 square feet(Lot 2)to 4,746 square feet(Lot 1). According to the table below, there are a total of two floor plans that will be used. All of the houses will have a three-car garage. The houses and site layout conform to the technical standards required in the Low Residential (L) District including setbacks, building height, and lot coverage. Lot No. Of Floor Plan 1St Floor 2 I Floor Total Living Garage Sto Type SF SF Area SF SF 1 2 A 2,521.74 2,225.06 4,745.80 775.20 2 2 B-1 2,488.02 1,867.17 4,355.19 720.24 3 2 B-2 2,767.52 1,975.54 4,743.36 720.24 The houses will also comply with the design guidelines specified within Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code, which require 360-degree architecture. The architectural styles that are proposed to be used are Craftsman and Ranch.The Craftsman elevation type,which will be used on Lot 1, will have stucco-finished walls witlr h stone veneer and horizontal siding, front porch with P g45 250 DRC COMMENTS TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 & MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700— W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS April 18, 2017 Page 2 battered columns, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage doors and windows. The Ranch elevation type, which will be used on Lots 2 and 3, will have stucco walls with stone veneer, horizontal siding (Lot 3), gable accents, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage doors and windows. Staff Comments: Staff is in support of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 and Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700. Each parcel complies with all the applicable development criteria for standard and flag-shaped lots within the Low Residential (L) District. The residences are well designed and the architectural design theme, and roof and wall plane articulation, has been applied to all elevations. Major Issues: The following design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: i 1. None. Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues: 1. None. Code Compliance issues: 1. None. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion: 1. None. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be approved and forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and action. Item C2-2 251 E7—£8 Pg46 RESOLUTION NO. 17-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557,A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE A PARCEL OF 42,150 SQUARE FEET INTO THREE(3)PARCELS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE (3) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 9757 LIBERTY STREET, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: 0201-251-56. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the apprgval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of May 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 42,150 square foot parcel located within the residential neighborhood at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue at 9757 Liberty Street. The dimensions of the parcel are 130.99 feet from east to west and 334 feet from north to south. The site contains an unoccupied single-family residence. There are a combination of wood fences and block walls along the east,west and south perimeters of the site. Street improvements along the north end of the property consist of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway. The site is generally level with an elevation change of about 16 feet between the northwest and southeast corners of the property; and b. The site is located within the Low-Residential (L) District. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west are developed with single-family homes and are also located within the Low-Residential (L) District; and C. The project proposes to subdivide the subject property into three (3) parcels and construct one single-family house on each lot; and 252 E7--E8 Pg47 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-41 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557-W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 2 d. The subdivision will result in a generally conventional lot(Lot 1)with two(2)flag lots (Lots 2 and 3) behind it (as seen from the street). The conventional lot will have an area of 11,492 square feet while the two flag lots will have areas of 13,303 square feet and 17,355 square feet (Lots 2 and 3, respectively). Lot 1 has a width of 91 feet and a depth of 134 feet. The "buildable" part of Lot 2 has a depth of 110 feet and a width of 100 feet while that of Lot 3 has a depth of 130.99 feet and a width of 100 feet. To allow vehicular and pedestrian access to Liberty Street,the flag lots will be connected to it by separate"poles", i.e. elongated sections of each lot. The poles for Lots 2 and 3 will be 20-foot wide by 110.4-foot long and 20-foot wide by 211-foot long, respectively; and e. The project also involves the construction of one 2-story house on each lot(Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700); and f. A neighborhood meeting was conducte to gather input and comments from the I of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Vineyard Junior High at 6440 Mayberry Avenue on January 18,2017. Several property owners from the surrounding community attended. Although none of them had any specific objections to the project,there were questions and concerns relating to the placement and design of 2-story homes, the timing of development, as well as the demolition of the existing house onsite. Staff indicated to the residents that the questions and concerns addressed at the neighborhood meeting would be taken into consideration moving forward; and g. The Design and Technical Review Committees reviewed the proposal on April 18, 2017. No issues were identified at either meeting and both Committees accepted the proposal as submitted and forwarded the project to the Planning Commission for review and action; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The General Plan encourages the facilitation of sustainable and attractive infill development that compliments surrounding neighborhoods.The project will meet this goal as the property is surrounded by single-family residences and will be complimentary to the neighborhood. The project is also in compliance with the Development Code as it meets the required development standards, including minimum lot dimensions and minimum and average lot area; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The subject site currently contains street improvements along the north end of the property consisting of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway; and C. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The site was previously developed and contains a single-family home and is located within an urbanized area of the City, surrounded by single-family homes along the north,south,east and west.The proposed subdivision will comply with the City's General Plan Land Use designation and is not anticipated to negatively impact the environment; and 253 E7—E8 Pg48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-41 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557 -W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 3 d. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems.The project involves the subdivision of a single parcel into three parcels for the construction of three single- family homes. The subdivision will comply with the City's density requirements specified within the Development Code and is not anticipated to cause serious public health problems; and e. The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.The adjacent properties to the west, south and east are single-family homes and to the north is public right-of-way. The proposed project will not conflict with any easements. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under Classes 3nd 15 exemptions under State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and 15315 (Minor Subdivisions) because the project involves the construction of three (3) single-family houses and a subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels, respectively.. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 254 E7—E8 Pg49 s Conditions of Approval `RANCII0 Community Development Department [IVCAM1IONG.1 Project#: SUBTPM19557 and DRC2014-00700 Praject Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map and Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the subdivision one (1) 42,116 square foot parcel into three (3) parcels for a site located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. 2. Approval is for the construction of three (3) two-story single-family residences on the future parcels to be subdivided on property located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56- 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the final map shall be recorded. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shat{ not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 39557 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM 19557. 6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 8. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission or unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code. all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 11. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. Printed 4�2E'24,26,2017www.C4yofRC.us E7-E8 Pg50 255 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 13.All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 14.All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained I by the property owner, homeowners' associatiorh or other means acceptable pt e t o the City. Ptoof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 16. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 17. Prior to any use of the project site, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, 18. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 19. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. Enalineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Protect, repair or relocate existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, street light and mailbox. 2. Remove existing drive approach and cobblestone and provide drive approaches per City Standard 101, Type R-1 and street trees per City standards. a. Revise existing City Drawing Number 1749 to reflect above improvements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. For pads below streets, the first 6 feet of the driveway should slope away from the right-of-way elevation at no more than 6 percent. Printed:412612017 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 11 256 E7—E8 Pg51 Project#. DRC2014-00700 Project Name: I MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineerina Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. Process a revision to Drawing Number 888-D to show the private storm drain connection(s) to the existing public storm drain. Minimum pipe size within the public right-of-way is 18" RCP. 5. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. Prior to any work being performed in the street right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from Engineering. 7. The following development impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of each building permit (fees subject1to change annually): I a. Transportation Fee b. General Drainage Fee c. Library Impact Fee d. Animal Center Impact Fee e. Police Impact Fee f. Park In-Lieu/Park Impact Fee g. Park Improvement Impact Fee h. Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 10. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 11. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 12. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 13. If the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: Liberty Street. 14. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed:4I2612017 www.cityomc.us Page 3 of 11 E7—E8 Pg52 257 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: _Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable laccess to the property exists. In no case shall mo�e than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 16. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Liberty Street Botanical Name Lagerstroemia Indica Common Name Cape Myrtle Spacing 20' OC Size 24" box Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 17. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities,, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 18. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 19. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. Printed;412 612 01 7 www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 11 258 E7—E8 Pg53 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 t Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 21. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Pian and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number(i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of ail plans. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Pian review. Printed:4126/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 19 E7—E8 Pg54 259 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and' Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plantpermit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 9. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacerit private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The precise grading and drainage pian shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 11 260 E7—E8 Pg55 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: 1) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 18. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 19. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 20. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number(WDID). 21. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 22. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Pian prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 23. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 24. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 25. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent Printed:4I2612017 www.C1tyofRG.us Page 7 of 1 i E7—E8 Pg56 261 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 26. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot fines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.21CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code, 28. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 29. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 30. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 31. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 33. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4126!2017 ?age 8 of 17 262 E7--E8 Pg57 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 34. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 35. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 37. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager, 40. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. www.CityofRC.us Primed:4I2612017 Page 9 of 11 263 E7-E8 Pg58 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII -- Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 44. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 45. As structural storm water treatment devices (commonly referred to as BMP's) are proposed in the rear yards of the residential lots, the developer/applicant is conditioned to provide access easement(s) in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to allow City staff access for inspections of the structural storm water treatment devices. Said easements may be shown on the Final Map, the Parcel Map or by a separate easement document. ,As an alternative, the CC&R's may be written to require the Homeowner's Association to inspect and maintain the BMP's on an annual basis 'and provide a BMP inspection and maintenance report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Programs Manager annually. 46. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 47. As the use of drywelis are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed:4126/2017 www.CilyofRC.us Page 10 of 11 264 E7--E8 Pg59 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 48. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. On the Site Plan to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within the vicinity of the proposed project site. 2. The required fire flow for this project is calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with current edition of the California Fire, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinance. 3. The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD54 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards can be access on the web at www.cityofrc.us. Printed:4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 11 265 E7—E8 Pg60 RESOLUTION NO. 17-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700 FOR A PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP THREE (3) SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES IN CONJUNCTION WITH TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19557 ON A PARCEL OF 42,150 SQUARE FEET WITHIN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL(L) DISTRICT LOCATED AT 9757 LIBERTY STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0201-251-56. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the approval of Minor Design Review DRC2014-00700 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a meeting on the application and concluded said meeting on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to,the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting on May 10, 2017, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 42,150 square foot parcel located within the residential neighborhood at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Lemon Avenue at 9757 Liberty Street. The dimensions of the parcel are 130.99 feet from east to west and 334 feet from north to south. The site contains an unoccupied single-family residence. There are a combination of wood fences and block walls along the east, west and south perimeters of the site. Street improvements along the north end of the property consist of street, curb and gutter, cobble parkway, sidewalk and an existing driveway. The site is generally level with an elevation change of about 16 feet between the northwest and southeast corners of the property; and b. The site is located within the Low-Residential (L) District. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east and west are developed with single-family homes and are also located within the Low-Residential (L) District; and C. The project proposes to subdivide the subject property into three (3) parcels and construct one single-family house on each lot (Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557); and 266 E7—E8 Pg61 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-42 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700—W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 2 d. The floor area of the houses will range in size from 4,355 square feet (Lot 2) to 4,746 square feet (Lot 1). According to the table below, there are a total of two floor plans that will be used. All of the houses will have a three-car garage. The houses and site layout conform to the technical standards required in the Low Residential (L) District including setbacks, building height, and lot coverage; and e. The houses will also comply with the design guidelines specified within Section 17.122.010 of the Development Code, which require 360-degree architecture. The architectural styles that are proposed to be used are Craftsman and Ranch. The Craftsman elevation type,which will be used on Lot 1, will have stucco-finished walls with stone veneer and horizontal siding, front porch with battered columns, concrete tile roofing and decorative garage doors and windows. The Ranch elevation type, which will be used on Lots 2 and 3,will have stucco walls with stone veneer, horizontal siding (Lot 3), gable accents, concrete the roofing and decorative garage doors and windows; and f. A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Vineyard Junior High at 6440 Mayberry Avenue on January 18,2017. Several property owners from the surrounding community attended. Although none of them had any specific objections to the project, there were questions and concerns relating to the placement and design of 2-story homes, the timing of development, as well as the demolition of the existing house onsite. Staff indicated to the residents that the questions and concerns addressed at the neighborhood meeting would be taken into consideration moving forward; and g. The Design and Technical Review Committees reviewed the proposal on April 18, 2017. No issues were identified at either meeting and both Committees accepted the proposal as submitted and forwarded the project to the Planning Commission for review and action. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low (L). The project is for the construction of three single-family residences on three previously subdivided parcels of land that conform to the maximum density range of the General Plan; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. The Low (L) District is designated for the development of single-family residences,with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per acre. The project is for the development of 3 single-family residences on a parcel that is proposed to be subdivided into three lots that will meets the lots size requirements; and C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project conforms to each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including building setbacks, lot coverage and building design; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements 267 E7—E8 Pg62 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 17-42 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2014-00700—W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 10, 2017 Page 3 in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residences are of similar design and density to the existing single-family development in the surrounding area. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)'and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under Classes 3 and 15 exemptions under State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and 15315 (Minor Subdivisions) because the project involves the construction of three (3) single-family houses and a subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels, respectively.. There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and'every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval. to the tion of this Resolution. shall certifyado 6. The Secretary to this Commissionp APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY 2017. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Francisco Oaxaca, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of May 2017, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 268 E7—E8 Pg63 Conditions of Approval RAN�.1io �aU.�t1C]ufi� Community Development Department Project#: SUBTPM19557 and DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST - 020125156-0000 Project Type: Tentative Parcel Map and Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Approval is for the subdivision one (1) 42,116 square foot parcel into three (3) parcels for a site located at 9757 Liberty Street - APN: 0201-251-56. 2. Approval is for the construction of three (3) two-story single-family residences on the future parcels to be subdivided on property located at 9757 Liberty Street- APN: 0201-251-56. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the final map shall be recorded. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Approval of Tentative Tract No. 19557 is granted subject to the approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557, 6. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval with Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 7. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 8. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission or unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 11. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. Printed 4l26I2017 www.CityofRC.us E7-E8 Pg64 269 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 13. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 14. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or I other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 15. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 16. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 17. Prior to any use of the project site, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 18. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 19. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Protect, repair or relocate existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, street light and mailbox. 2. Remove existing drive approach and cobblestone and provide drive approaches per City Standard 101, Type R-1 and street trees per City standards. a. Revise existing City Drawing Number 1749 to reflect above improvements, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 3. For pads below streets, the first 6 feet of the driveway should slope away from the right-of-way elevation at no more than 6 percent. Printed:4/28/2017 www.C4ofRC.us Page 2 of 41 270 E7—E8 Pg65 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDI for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 4. Process a revision to Drawing Number 888-D to show the private storm drain connection(s) to the existing public storm drain. Minimum pipe size within the public right-of-way is 18" RCP. 5. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public improvements, prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. Prior to any work being performed in the street right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from Engineering. 7. The following development impact fees shall be paid upon issuance of each building permit (fees subject to chdnge annually). a. Transportation Fee b. General Drainage Fee c. Library Impact Fee d. Animal Center Impact Fee e. Police Impact Fee f. Park ]n-Lieu/Park Impact Fee g. Park Improvement Impact Fee h. Community and Recreation Center Impact Fee Standard Conditions of Approval 8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quit-claimed or delineated on the final map. 10. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the map. 11. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 12. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 13. if the required public improvements are not completed prior to approval of the final parcel map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the Developer and the City will be required for: Liberty Street. 14. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." if there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Printed:412612017 wwwZtyofRC.us Page 3 of 11 271 E7--E8 Pg66 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Namelt MDR for Parcel 19557 Location. 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services De artment Standard Conditions of Approval 15. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable accesf to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 16. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Liberty Street Botanical Name Lagerstroemia Indica Common Name Cape Myrtle Spacing 20' OC Size 24" box Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 17. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 18. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 19. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) ,in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:4126!2017 Page 4 of 11 272 E7—E8 Pg67 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. 21. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 2. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. 3. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and g. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly identified on the outside of all plans. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. Printed'4/26/2017 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of i I E7--E8 Pg68 273 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 9. it shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the Building and Safety Official a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 10. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the ' public 'right of way, permitted line, or the adjacerit private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Printed:4!26!2017 vrww.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 11 274 E7—E8 Pg69 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Plrcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building inspector; b) The grading contractor shall tali into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building. permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to Q Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 18. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 19. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 20. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). 21. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 22..If the depths of the infiltration,pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm .Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 23. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 24. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 25. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent Printed:4/2612017 www.CifyofRC.us Page 7 of 11 275 E7-E8 Pg70 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: M4R for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 26. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 27. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 28. Prior to is�uance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtail a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 29. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site, 30. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 31. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 33. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. www.CltyofRc.us Printed:4/26/2017 Page 8 of 11 276 E7--E8 Pg71 Project#: DRC2014-00700 rroject Blame: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 34. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 35. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration ` chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 1 1 I 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 37. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (SMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan, 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Pian prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager, 40. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. Printed:412612017 www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 11 277 E7--E8 Pg72 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of tAe maintenance agreements to be included in the sal of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H. Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 44. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 45. As structural storm water treatment devices (commonly referred to as BMP's) are proposed in the rear yards of the residential lots, the developer/applicant is conditioned to provide access easement(s) in favor of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to allow City staff access for inspections of the structural storm water treatment devices. Said easements may be shown on the Final Map, the Parcel Map or by a separate easement document. As an alternative, the CC&R's may be written to require the Homeowner's Association to inspect and maintain the BMP's on an annual basis 'and provide a BMP inspection and maintenance report to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Programs Manager annually. 46. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official,, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 47. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan document. Printed:4/2612017 www.Cityo{RC.US Page 10 of 11 278 E7—ES Pg73 Project#: DRC2014-00700 Project Name: MDR for Parcel 19557 - Location: 9757 LIBERTY ST- 020125156-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section, Standard Conditions of Approval 48. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. On the Site Plan to be submitted for review, show all fire hydrants located within the vicinity of the proposed project site. 2. The required fire flow for this project is calculated in gallons per minute at a minimum residual pressure of 20-pounds per square inch. This requirement is made in accordance with current edition of the California Fire, as adopted by the Fire District Ordinance. 3. The project must comply in design and constructed in accordance with the 2010 California Building and Fire Codes, the RCFPD Ordinance FD54 and the RCFPD Standards. The RCFPD ordinance, procedures & standards can be access on the web at www.cityofrc.us. wawv.CityofRC.us Printedr4126/217 Page 11 of 11 279 E7-E8 Pg74 W&W Land Design Consultants 2335 W. Foothill Blvd., Suite 1, Upland, CA 91786 Civil engineering, Subdivision, Land planning PH: (909) 608-7118 Fax: ffiD 946-1137 Ms. Anne McIntosh, AICP Planning Director Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 March 2, 2020 Subject: 15t Time of Extension of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM 19557 Three (3) Single-family Residential Homes in Conjunction with TTM 19557 on a parcel of 42,150 SF with Low Residential (L) District located at 9757 Liberty Street; APN: 0201-251-56-0000 Dear Anne McIntosh, We are requesting an extension for the approved Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM 19557 for the above-described project. The Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM 19557 was approved by the Planning Commission at its meeting on May 11, 2017. We are fully aware that this approval has approaching its 3-year expiration date therefore are requesting an extension for the following reasons: • The owner side evaluates current house marketing in good condition to allow them to move forward all construction documents and permits this year and also start construction in 2020. • We expects all civil engineering plans including final parcel map and architectural plans for construction documents will be submitted to City for plan check review in middle of this April. We hope that the reasons provided above are sufficient enough to receive an extension. If you would like to speak more about this, please contact me at winstonliu@wwldc.com or (909) 608-7118. Thank you for review this letter and we look forward to hearing back from you. The following documents have been attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof: • Approval of Minor Design Review Modification DRC2014-00700 • Approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM 19557 Sincerely, Winston Liu, PE Property Owner 280 Exhibit A RESOLUTION NO. 20-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095, A REQUEST TO ALLOW FOR A ONE (1) YEAR TIME EXTENSION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19557, A SUBDIVISION OF APPROXIMATELY .98 ACRES INTO 3 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED LOTS WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 9757 LIBERTY STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0201-251-56. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application a time extension to extend the approval period of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map Time Extension request is referred to as "the application." 2. On May 10, 2017, this Commission adopted Resolution No. 17-41, thereby approving the application subject to specific conditions and time limits. 3. On April 22, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing for the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. On April 22, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga approved a one (1) year time extension for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557, extending the approval period to April 22, 2021. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on April 22, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 0.98 acres rectangular-shaped parcel of land located at 9757 Liberty Street with a linear dimension, from north to south, of approximately 334 feet and a linear dimension, from east to west, of approximately 130.99 feet and is developed with one (1) single-family residence; and b. The site is located within the Low (L) Residential District. The surrounding properties to the north, south, east, and west are developed with single-family homes and are also located within the Low (L) Residential District; and 281 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-24 TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS April 22, 2020 Page 2 C. The subdivision of the project site conforms to all applicable development standards of the Development Code for the Low (L) Residential District; and d. This application is a request to extend the approval period of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 for one (1) additional year. The time extension is necessary to allow time for the property owner to evaluate the current housing market and finalize the civil engineering plans. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The previously approved Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City's current General Plan, Municipal Code, ordinances, plans, codes, and policies. The proposed project is for the subdivision of 0.98 acres of land for three (3) single-family detached lot development. The project site is within the Low (L) Residential District, which permits the development of single-family projects with a density of maximum 4 dwelling units per acre. The approved three (3) unit single-family development on the project site has a density of approximately 3.1 dwelling units per acres; and b. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. Currently the site is developed with one single-family home that is unoccupied. The project involves grading of the site to comply with City requirements and to be consistent with previously approved tract maps within the vicinity of the subject property; and C. The proposed subdivision, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and d. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed subdivision complies with all development standards outlined in the Development Code for single-family projects within the Low (L) Residential District, including density, setbacks and design; and e. The time extension is within the time limits established by State law and local ordinance. State law allows for one (1) year time extensions. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Categorical Exemption on May 10, 2017, in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557. The project qualified under the Classes 3 and 15 exemptions under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and 15315 (Minor Subdivisions) because the project involves the construction of three (3) single-family residential homes and a subdivision of one (1) parcel into three (3) parcels. It has been determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project may have significant effects on the environment. 282 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-24 TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS April 22, 2020 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 above, this Commission hereby grants a time extension. The new expiration date for Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19557 is April 22, 2021. 6. All applicable Conditions of Approval in Resolution No. 17-41 for SUBTPM19557 shall apply to Time Extension DRC2020-00095. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22ND DAY OF APRIL, 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, ACIP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day of April 2020, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 283