Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1994/10/05 - Agenda Packet
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. October 5, 1994 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Diane William s, Councilmember Jack Lnm, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda October 5, 1994 All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The deadline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. PAGE A. CALL TO ORDER . Alexander , Stout Roll Call: Buquet Willi~ms , and Gutierrez B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS Presentation of a Proclamation for Donald Bishop for his courage and level thinking during a very tense hostage situation. Presentation of a Proclamation to the Rancho Cucamonga Lions Club and Von's Grocery for their support of the D.A.R.E. program. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: August 17, 1994 (Stout absent) August 22, 1994 September 7, 1994 Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 9/14/94 and 9/21/94; and Payroll ending 9/8/94 for the total amount of $1,342,058.08. City Council Agenda October 5, 1994 , Alcoholic Beverage Application for "47" On-Sate General Eating Place for restaurant, Brinker Restaurant Corporation, 10598 Foothill Boulevard. Approval of Appointments of Citizen-at-Large Members to the Sports Advisory Committee for 1994/95. 5. Approval of Appointments to the Senior Advisory Committee. Approval of a Resolution approving the construction of a heNport and the basing of helicopter at Fire Station No. 174, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Jersey Boulevard. RESOLUTION NO. 94-195 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL QF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HELlPORT AND THE BASING OF A HELICOPTER AT AN EXISTING FIRE STATION (STATION #174), LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between Luis A. Cerda and Frances G, Cerda and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (Budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-196 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHQ CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM LUIS A. CERDA AND FRANCES G, CERDA, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME , Approval to execute a Lease Agreement (CO 94-073) for use of a portion of Coyote Canyon School Site (Formerly Ruth Musser School Site) with Lewis Homes of California. Approval to award and authorization for execution of a contract (CO 94-074) for the 1994/95 Fiscal Year Street Rehabilitation Program at Various Locations, which includes cape seal and slurry seal, for the amount of $600,773.00 ($545,848.27 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Account No. 01-4640-9400. PAGE 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 City Council Agenda October 5, 1994 10. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 14365 located on the south side of Mountain View Drive west of Milliken Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 262~0:].00 26200.03 RESOLUTION NO, 94-197 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE ClTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14365 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING QF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 11. Approval to vacate Thomas Street from Cleveland Avenue to Vincent Avenue, Vincent Avenue from Fourth Street to Thomas Street, Seventh Street from Milliken Avenue to Cleveland Avenue, Cleveland Avenue from Fourth Street to Sixth Street, a portion of Cleveland Avenue (Generally the easterly six feet) from Sixth Street to Seventh Street and a portion of the northeast corner of Seventh Street and Cleveland Avenue, and setting the date of the Public Hearing for November 2, 1994 (APN: 209-272-01, [:]4, 06 and 07; 210-081-22 and 23: 210-082-02, 37 and 38; 210-361-01 through 24 and 26). RESOLUTION NO. 94-198 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THOMAS STREET FROM CLEVELAND AVENUE TO VINCENT AVENUE, VINCENT AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO THOMAS STREET, SEVENTH STREET FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE TO CLEVELAND AVENUE, CLEVELAND AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO SIXTH STREET, A PORTION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE (GENERALLY THE EASTERLY SIX FEED FROM SIXTH STREET TO SEVENTH STREET AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SEVENTH STREET AND CLEVELAND AVENUE (APN'S: 209-272-01, []4, 06 AND 07; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082- 02, 37 AND 38; 210-361-01 THROUGH 24 AND 26 PAGE 27 28 29 32 City Council Agenda October 5, 1994 E. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. PAGE 4 F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PI ACE - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from September 21, 1994) RESOLUTION NO, 94-199 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLINING TO REVOKE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-03 AND ACCEPTING THE APPLICANTS RELINQUISHMENT OF SAID PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION QF A BAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER QF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF- APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60 , CONSIDERATION OF ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM 'S PLACE - A request to revoke an Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 20-1811- 56 through 60. (Continued from September 21, 1994) 42 41 City Council October Agenda 5, 1994 PAGE 5 RESOLUTION NO. 94-200 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLINING TO REVOKE ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 91-02 AND ACCEPTING THE APPLICANT'S RELINQUISHMENT OF SAID PERMIT FOR A BAR AND RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND 19TH STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201- 811-56 THROUGH 60 CONSIDERATION OF LANDMARK DESIGNATION 94-02 - CAMPOS - Consideration of an application to designate 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard as either an Historic Landmark or an Historic Point of Interest - APN: 208-153-08, 09, 10, and 11. RESOLUTION NO. 94-201 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL QF HISTORIC LANDMARK 94-02 TO DESIGNATE FOUR HOUSES LOCATED AT 9618, 9626, 9634, AND 9642 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AS LOCAL LANDMARKS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-153-08, 09, 10, AND 11 45 48 61 G. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have no legal requirements. The Chair will open public testimony. publication or posting the meeting to receive No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. No Items Submitted. City Council Agenda October 5, 1994 PAGE 6 I. COUNCIL BUSINESS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. UPDATE BY MARKS CABLEVISION (Continued from September 7, 1994) CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OPPOSING HR 1843 WHICH MAY REQUIRE ALL MOBILE HOME PARK DESIGNATIONS TO BE CHANGED FROM ADULT AND/OR SENIOR ONLY TO ALL FAMILY DESIGNATIONS (Continued from September 21, 1994) (ITEM TO BE CONTINUED TO OCTOBER 19, 1994) CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR WfLDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY (Continued from September 21, 1994) RESOLUTION NO. 94-194 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROGRAM TO CONSERVE WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY DISCUSSION OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO PREVENT CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES DISCUSSION ON DEVELOPING A BAR/LOUNGE/ENTERTAINMENT ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN RESOLUTION NO. 94-202 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. OPPOSING THE FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN IN ITS CURRENT FORM CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE ON MEMBERSHIP SELECTION (Oral Repod) 64 69 7O 84 86 118 119 122 City Council Agenda October 5, 1994 J. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. PAGE K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 29, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. CITY OF RANClIO C, ~NGA L)rST OF NARRAN,$ FOR PER)rOD: 09-14-94 (94/953 wmmwwmmaewwmmmmwmmwwmm am RUN DATE: 09114194 PAGE% iTEM DESCR)rPTZON MIRA NO NARR. ANT. 6335 OATSiDE 8UXLOERS 6401 CANOEHAS, CATHERINE 4228 K O K ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTORS 2069 HEYDEw DONALD L. 319 SO CAL)rF GAS CO. 12779 )rNLANO ENP)rRE APA 12779 iNLANO ENP)rRE APA Z)r55 G)rULEA, VASXLE I A ~ A EQUIPMENT RENTALS CO., inC. 4347 ACCURATE SMOG, AUTO, TRUCK 3785 ACT)tON ART 4344 AMERICAN OFF)rCE EQUIPMENT 2693 AHTECN REL)rABLE ELEVATOR 2076 APOLLO INDUSTRIES )rNC. 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANY, lNC 4)43 lANK OF AMERICA 843r lank OF AMERICA-CORPORATE 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDMARE 3193 8RUNZCK, ALVAREZ g BATTERSlY 249 8UQUET, CHARLES ZZ 2440 BURRUSO, LiSA 457 C & e LUMBER CO 1646 C C A P A 3942 CAL VEST[AN TERMITE PEST CONTROL 6558 CALXFORN)rA OLDG CODES INSTITUTE 6559 CAREFREE POOLS & SPAS 3622 CHANeER OF COMMERCE 468 CHEVRON U S At ZNC 74 CITY RENTALS 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLY 4022 CONPETROL NFG,, ZNC. 4306 COMPUTER CiTY 643 CONFUTEALAMO 6560 COHPUTERV)rSZON CORPORAT)rON 85 CUCANQNGA CO MATER DZST 239 D C K CONCRETE CO 355 DANZELS TIRE SERVICE 2418 OAFPER TiRE Z291 DATAVAULT - U-S- SAFE DEPOSIT 60 DELTA DENTAL PLAN OF CALZF 3814 EASTLAND CONSTRUCT[ONe INC. 523 EASTMAN[ )rNC 2422 ELECTRON)rCS MAR[HOUSE 2121 FARR°S - RANCNO CUCANONGA 1Z3 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP REFUNO DEPOSIT RECREATION REFUND CONTRACT SERVICES iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT MONTHLY GAS DILLS DENHER RESERVATIONS OXNNER RESERVATIONS CASH ADVANCE (<< VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE/SUPPL)rES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES RECREAT)rON SUPPLIES -' OFFiCe EQUIPMENT & REPAIR MONTHLY SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEM)rCLE NA)rNTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESS)tONAL SERVZCES ADMINISTRATION FEES NA)rNTENANCE $UPPL)rE$ BOOKiNG FEES RE)fRO. BUSINESS RELATED EXP. INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT NA)rNTENANCE SUPPLIES REGiStRATION MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE NONRESXOENTIAL DISABLED NTG, BUS)tRESS LICENSE REFUNO MONTHLT PAYMENT GASOLINE CHARGES EQUZPHENT RENTAL/SUPPL)rES VEHICLE nA)rNTENANCE SUPPL)rES MAINTENANCE REPAIRS/SUPPLIES OFFZCE EQUIPMENT COMPUTER NAXNTENANCE/SUPPL)rES BUS)tRESS LICENSE REFUND MONTHLY MATER 8)rLLXNGS STREET NA)rNTENANCE VEHXCLE NA)rNTENANCE & SUPPLIES VEH)rCLE MAiNTENANCE/SUPPLiES DATA STORAGE DENTAL iNSURANCE PROGRESS ESTZNATE OFFICE SUPPL)rES ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES DELIVERY SERVICE ** CHECKI OVERLAP 8753r68 250.00- 87511- 89062 89o63, z0.70- 89064- 89566 895698 13,770.75 895~0- 89638 896398 262.50- 89640- 89736 891318 604.95 897388 45.00 · 897398 90.00 89740- 89872 898738 300.00 89814- 89116 I 89877 384.48 89878 19.99 89619 631.69 89880 92-25 I 89681 2,407.99 89882 29,63 · 89883 321.06 89864 20.25 O 89885 1,530.00 t 89886 18.89 e 89887 531.55 89888 52.00 69889 23.40 · 89890 130.50 e Pq891 90.00 I 89892 714.93 89893 150.00 89896 20.00 89695 36.00 89896 35.19 89897 45.90 I 89898 634.09 89899 101.29 89900 11.02 69901 39.24 89902 136.62 · 89903 5,591.89 I 89904 1e332.87 89905 435.09 · 89906 2,888.99 89907 llT.O0 89908 141764.29 89909 69,021.72 I 89910 278.51 8 89911 59.87 89912 6.41 89913 32.50 CITY OF RANCNO CUCAHONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 09-I4-94 RUN DATE: 09/I4/94 PAGEI 2 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. ANT. 2860 FORD OF UPLAND, INC. 98 FORO PRINTING L NAILING, INC 656I FRANCOIS, LARRY 3605 FUN CORNER 3388 GOLDEN BEAR ARBDRZSTS. INC. l)T GTE CALIFORNIA 1855 HARRZNGTQN inC., R.E. 462 HCS-CUTLER STEEL CO. 2069 HEYDEe DONALD Lo 4~50 HOLIDAY PRiNTiNG 3634 HOUSE OF RUTH lot HOYT LUHRER CO.. SoN. 66 iNDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 3736 INLAND EMPIRE SOCCER REFEREE ASSNa 3885 iNLAND LAMNNQMER 907 iNLAND NEOIATZON BOARD 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 2315 INLAND NNOLESALE NURSERY lZTT7 KIRSHBAUN NeDDe ROBERT 1216 KNOX 321 LANOSCAPE NEST IZTT8 LAN ENFORCEMENT LEGAL REPORTER.INC. I2780 LEAGUE OF CALiFORNia CiTiES I2775 n Z S A C - C/O FREO HOUAT 3907 RASTER-SORTs INCa 1025 NC HASTER-CARR SUPPLY COHPANY 403 NORTON COATINGS, INC. - BAUER [ZTT6 N.S.LZOU ZZ48 NaPa AUTO PARTS 2545 NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION 3437 NATIONAL UNZFORN SERVICE TI2 NORRIS-REPKE. iNCa 3546 NURSERYLAND 3632 OLDTIMERS FOUNDATION 336 PACIFIC EQUXPT L IRRIGATION, XNCo 757 PEP BOYS 10T9 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA Z55 PONA DISTRIBUTING CO 1049 POMONA VALLEY KANASAKZ 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY Z51 R L R AUTOHOTIVE 618 R N A GROUP 2600 RANCHO CUCANONGA FIRE OXSTRICT 565 RED NING SHOE STORE 6074 RESCUE ROQTER 214 SAN BERN CQ SOLID NASTE NGHENT 303 SAN BERNAROZNO COUNTY 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COe INC 3313 SARTOR°S MOBILE HONE. PETE 490 SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO. el CHECKI OVERLAP VEHICLE HAXNTENANCE · 89914 MAINTENANCE C OPERATIONS 89915 LHD 7 REFUND 89916 OFFICE SUPPLIES I 69917 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 89918 MONTHLY TELEPHONE 6XLLXNG$ t 89919 UNEHPLOYHENT COMPENSATION SVCS 89920 EQUXPHENT MAINTENANCE 89921 INSTRUCTOR PAYRENT 899Z2 PRINTING OF THE GRAPEVINE 899Z3 93/94 COBG CONTRACT 89924 HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES 899Z5 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 89926 HEN'S SOCCER FROGRAN t 89927 V~HXCLE MAINTENANCE I 89928 LANDLORO/TENANT DISPUTE e 899Z9 SUBSCRIPTIONS -' 69930 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89931 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8993Z MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 89933 LANDSCAPE HAINTENANCE I 89934 SUBSCRIPTION 89935 ARTICLE VII - DUES 89936 I YEAR HEHBERSHZP 89937 PRESORT HAIL SERVICES 89938 HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 89939 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89940 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89941 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 89942 DUES FOR HATOR 69943 UNIFORm SERVICES , 89944 CONSULTING SERVICES 89945 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 69946 OLDTXHER$ FOUNDATION 89947 HAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 89949 PHOTO SUPPLIES I 89950 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE & SUPPLIES 89951 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89952 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 89953 VEHICLE NAZNTeSUPPLXESLSERVZCE · 89956 SOIL TESTING SERVICES 69951 PLAN CHECK SERVICES 89958 SAFETY 80075 89959 DEPOSIT REFUND 89960 MONTHLY SERVICE 89961 ENGINEERING OFFICE SUPPLIES 8996Z NAINT SUPPLIES I 89963 ReNA8 FROGRAN 89964 Ol 89965 105.77 664.03 202.43 lOO.O0 22,1Z0.00 496.91 600.00 234.90 SO.OO 11,436.02 633.36 IT.99 360.24 6,150.00 851.03 1,648.89 26.86 Z8.45 588.00 315.46 75,917.83 Z9.50 lOO.O0 IZO.O0 198.21 156.32 1HI.TO 6.1Z T.OZ 15.00 859.32 7,796.05 48.00 521.68 32.39 132.25 72.73 1.261.24 461.96 1.368.42 3,193.40 1,672.50 ZIZ.50 125.96 1,000.00 2,410.31 9.70 525.62 412.50 18.31 CITY OF RANCNO C ,ONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIODI 09-16-9& (94/95) mmmeemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmeemmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm RUN OATE% 09114194 PAGE% ) NAME ""' .....""""""""""""'------------------ ....--........................ ITEM DESCRiPTiON WARR NO WARR. ANT. 4 535 SEMPLE, JUDY 2507 SXEeE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 319 SO CALIF GAS CO. li3Z SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON Z31Z STATEWIDE RENT A FENCEm INC. 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 4114 TAYLOR-DUNN 3733 TOM WORLD CONVERSZONSm LTO. 693 UeSo/WHITE VAN BATTERY COem INC, 2958 UMPS ARE US ASSOCIATION 3422 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 4326 WASTE ENVRNMNT'L $VCS g TRANSPORT Zl3 WAXIEm KLEEN-LXNE CORP 637 WEST END UNIFORMS 9& WOLFINDARGER INC,m O,F, 675 WYNN°S FROSTEMP/MAXAIR 509 XEROX CORPORATION 368 ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT SERVICE/SUPPLIES MONTHLY GAS 6ILLS ((( MONTHLY ELECTRZC 8ILLS MAZNTEkANCE SUPPLIES MAZNT SUPPLIES ALARN SERVZCE VEHZCLE MAZNT SUPPLZES/SERVZCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES UHP SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES WASTE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES MAINT SUPPLIES UNIFORM SERVICE LANDSCAPE SUPPLZES VEHICLE MAINT SUPPLIES COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERVICE VEHICLE MAZNT SUPPLIES $* CHECKE OVERLAP 89966 17~.00 89967 26Z.00 I 89968 451.26 89969 - 89976 ))) e 89971 11,302.37 89978 ZO.)8 89979 350.27 89980 560,74 89981 101.82 89982 171.87 I 89983 Zm923.50 e 89984 35.42 89985 45,00 I 89986 954.11 89987 51,72 89988 247°83 89989 2.81 I 89990 1m719.38 69991 354,21 TOTAL Z~Oe955olT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAr ~A LIST OF MARRANT FOR PER[OO: 09-21-~ .96/953 [TEN OESCRZPTIQN NARR NO NARR. ANT. 6ZO RRONNe OTTER & HENTSCNKE 2705 R,H.F.e ZNC. 3606 ECOFFw JILL 4350 SCHNEZOERNENT, KAREN I A · A EQUIPKENT RENTALS CO.. ZNCo 211 A · I ALARM SYSTEMS 2132 AOC LOCK 6562 ACHTEN NAINTENANCE 3529 ALAR GLASS 1135 ALIGNMENT & BRAKE SPECIALISTS 1430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORKS 22 AMERICAN PUBLIC NORMS ASSOCIATION 2693 ARTECH RELIABLE ELEVATOR CO. 26 ASSOCZATEO ENGINEERS 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANTe 6563 eAILeY, BRAD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ee CNECKI OVERLAP 073135 ((< 87314 VEHICLE NAZNT SERVICE&SUPPLIES ((( 89838 ERPLOYEE/CORNUTER OF THE NORTH <(< BBETS LIBRARY SUPPLIES ((( 19993 VEHTCLF RATNTENANCE/SUPPLZES ALARM SERVICE NAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES APNA MEMBERSHIP MONTHLY SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES REFUND PARKING CITATION 19836 ))) 89837 89873 89874, 69991 )>) 89992e 89995 89996 89997 89998 09999 90000 90001 90 O02 90003 90004 90005 90006 90007 6564 6AKER'S BURGEMS 8USINESS LICENSE REFUND 803 BALDY VEER PUBLIC/PRIVATE COALITION CLOUT HEETZNG RBl BANK OF AMERICA-CORPORATE ADMINISTRATION FEES 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE HARDMARE 6336 BENGAL RECVCLZNGe INC. 3863 BOPgO, CHRISTOPHER 620 RIOeKe DIVER L HENTSCNKE 6565 RITE 6581 C O S Z · A 6579 CA/RZ/NV ARC/ZNFO USERS' GROUP 1851 CAL NESTERR PAINT 3942 CAL NESTINN TERMITE PEST CONTROL 937 CALCORP INCo 1223 CALIFORNIA SENSOR CORPORATION 3305 CAROE PACIFIC CORPORATION 6580 CCEC 3695 CELLULAR NOBILE PHONE CONPANY 66 CENTRAL CITIES SIGN SERVICE 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIOt [NC. 4349 CLARKe DEBORAH 6566 CLARKe RACHEL 2470 COLTON TRUCK SUPPLT 6570 CON OYSTERS INC. 6567 CONNERCZAL CARRIERS 2692 CONFUSERYE. INCORPORATED 6S68 COMPUTER PALACE 826 COMPUTERVISION CORPORATION 6569 CORPUTERVZS/ON CORPORATION 633 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL OXST, 930 CORONA CLAY CON·ANT 239 D L K CONCRETE CO MAINTENANCE $UPPLZE$ PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REIMBURSE FOR OFFICE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICE5 SUBSCRIPTION RENENAL RISK MANAGEMENT TRAINING REGIONAL USERS' GROUP NTG, MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MONTHLY PEST CONTROL SERVICE MONTHLY SERVICE OFFZCEINAZNTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE/VEHICLE SUPPLIES CA. CODE ENFORCEMENT flEETING SUPPLIES/SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPpLIES REZRB LIBRARY EQUZPISUPPLIE$ RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE RAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND DEPOSIT REFUND MONTHLY SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES STREET MAINTENANCE 90008 90009 90010 I 90011 90012 90013 90014 90015 90016 I 90011 I 90018 # 90019 I 900ZO I 90021 I 90022 90023 90024 90025 I 90026 · 90027 90028 90029 90030 90031 90032 90033 90034 90035 90036 e 90037 · 90036 ZOeZZB.85- 91.10- 422.11 300.00 21.72 693.00 926.03 9.90 213.93 323.55 199.12 80.00 680.19 396.00 596.96 66.00 7Z.OZ 60.00 At231.lO 33.62 25.00 45.79 20e229.85 24.95 50.00 310.00 1e294.67 660.93 960.00 lee444.OT 1,425.91 ZSO.O0 65.00 95.36 266°00 403.17 t6.00 62,61 Z6,93 500.00 43.50 22.93 2e996.54 191.28 15.95 1,562.38 525.26 b b · · · · · · · · · · · · b CITY OF RANCNO CUCANONGA LIST OF WARRANTS FOR PERIODI 09-21-94 (94195) RUN OATE: 09/21/94 PAGE: Z VENDOR NAME ITEM OESCRZPTION NARR NO MARR. ANT. me CHECK/OVERLAP 355 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE VEHICLE NAINTENANCE £ SUPPLIES 90039 153o43 6571 DEAN'S GREENS NURSERY BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90040 14o90 4105 OEPARTNENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTS 900&l 96.00 902 OEPTo pF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL HAZNTENANCE 90042 1t446o54 lOT OETCO OFFICE SUPPLIES m 90F, 3 45.79 657Z DI CARLO:, BARBARA DEPOSIT REFUND 90044 leO00oOO 3484 DOC JOE°S MAINTENANCE REPAIRS I 90045 75.00 523 EASTHANs INC OFFICE SUPPLIES t 900~6 1:,322.51 3604 ECOPFe JILL EMPLOYEE/COMMUTER OF THE MONTH I 90047 15o00 6573 EVENLY, RELANIE RECREATION REFUNO 90048 I6o00 6574 FAITN'S HALLMARK SHOP ·USINESS LICENSE REFUND 90069 9°26 6571 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS REFUND PLAN CHECK FEE 9OOSO 118.13 125 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INS, CO. PROPERTY PROFILE 9005I 25.00 2397 FIRST SOLUTIONS COMPUTER SUPPLIES/RENTAL 90052 269.38 6575 FONTANA STEEL INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90053 200.00 3947 FOURTH STREET ROCK MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 90054 Z:,137o63 1012 FRANKLIN QUEST CO, OFFICE SUPPLIES I 90055 87,50 6576 FRASURE:, MIKE REIMBURSE FOR NORM BOOTS 90056 150.00 6577 FULLRER CONSTRUCTION DEPOSXT PERNIT REFUND 90057 1:,000,00 744 GREAT NESTERN SAVINGS DEFERRED COMP 90058 SeS69.OO 1900 GRIPPITH RAOZATO~ SALES VEHZCL~ MAINTENANCE 90059 tO~.OO <(< 90060 - 90060 137 GTE CALIFORNIA MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS t 90061 9,735.82 146 HAINES t COMPANY:, INC, 12 MONTH LEASE SERVICE 90062 174.12 735 HAVEN CAR bASH FULL SERVICE CAR WASH ·00KS 90063 529°00 3520 NATNES:, FRANKLIN PUPPET NORKSHOP 90064 250°00 12796 HELM CORPORATION OVERPHT ON PERMIT 194-5010 90065 63.00 ISI HOLLIDAY ROCK COo:, XNCo HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES 90066 55°06 495 HYORO-SCAPE PRODUCTS:, ZNC LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 90067 243.87 103 I C N A RetIREMENT TRUST-4ST DEFERRED COMP 90068 1,Z77.00 4143 I P $ SERVICES 93/94 PAVEMENT REHAB. I 90069 225:,967.90 11188 IMPERIAL SHAOE& VENETIAN BLIND COo BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 90070 68°40 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALl MAXNIC~ANCE SUPPLIES · 9007I 486.45 lZT94 INLAND EMPIRE SPORT COUNCIL RECREATION REFUNO 90072 563.3~ 92 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTIONS 90073 Z6.86 122 INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN ADVERTISING · 90074 3:,062.96 2048 IRON MOUNTAIN FORGE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 90015 797.07 12791 KATRZNA'S DISCOUNT BOUTZQUE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 90076 12.00 12781 KLIPP:, RS ELLEN DEPOSIT REFUND 90077 250.00 1411 KNAPP SHOE COMPANY SAFETY SHOES R 90078 2:,152.00 1218 KNOX MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 90079 661,38 12795 L.T.Go SYSTEMATIC:, INC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90060 26.80 4242 LAZDLAN TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 9008I 256.78 321 LANOSCAPE bEST LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE I 9008Z 4:,470°69 849 LAWSON PROOUCTSe INC. MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 90083 1:,287o24 12189 LENZCO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90084 23.02 1455 LONG'S DRUGS FILM PROCESSING I 90085 53,86 3156 LU'S LIGHTHOUSEs INCe OIL ANALYSIS 90086 82,06 3201 LUPE L JOMNNY'S BODY & PAINT SHOP MAINTENANCE 90087 501.93 600 LYNCH:, JANZE RECREATION SUPPLIES 90088 36oI2 I062 d C Z TELECONNUNICATIONS TELEPHONE SERVICES I 90089 582.72 CITY OF RANCMD CUCA LIST OF MARRANT_,, FOR PERIOD: 09-21-94 ee CHECA8 OVERLAP 1Z797 N J F & ASSQCIATESe INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 90090 8.000.00 549 NARZFOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT.ZNC. LANDSCAPE NKZNTENANCE · 90091 33.834.26 12 HARK CNRIS. INC. VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 90092 123o16 76 NARKNANeARCZYNSKZeHANSONe& KING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES R 90093 10.530o21 12712 NABS ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION DEPOSIT REFUND 90094 18000.00 12184 MATTERN CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90095 75.82 2555 HC ALLiSTER OESZGN DESIGN OF BUSINESS CAROS I 90096 409.45 749 MlJAC ALARM COMPANY ALARH SERVICES I 90097 605.00 3801 NITCHELL'S MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 90098 11.95 12792 MOBIL OIL CORP. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90099 510.00 12786 NONTEBELLO CONTAINER CORPo BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90100 82020 3316 NR. T'S Z4-HRo TONING TOkING 90101 95.00 12190 NUELLER CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90102 40.50 412 N B Z MAINTENANCE CONTRACT · 90103 2,652.00 12785 NANCY°S HALLMARK SHOP BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90104 17.68 2241 NAPA AUTO PARTS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 90105 388018 12713 NASCIMIENTO. LOUISE RECREATION REFUND 90106 8000 3437 NATIONAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICES I 90107 1e441.61 433 NIXON-EGLI EQUIPMENT VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 90108 39.29 712 MORIIS-IEPKEe inC. CONSULTZNG SERVICES · 90109 10e242.13 232 ONNZTRANS 8US PASSES 90110 12.50 2410 ONTARIO, CiTY OF QUARTERLY BILLING 90111 4,352.78 1949 ORACLE CORP. MAINTENANCE SERVICE I 90112 3,143.15 12793 OS/2 MAGAZINE SUBSCRZPTION 90113 29.95 12117 QSAGE ROOFING CO-e INC, BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 90114 59°23 235 OMEN ELECTRIC MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 90115 2.48 8075 PALLOTTO, BILL DEPOSIT REFUND 90116 SO0.O0 8076 PATEL.DOSe RAKESH BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 90117 9.50 487 PATTON SALES CORPo MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 90116 31.23 2587 PETERSONe LZLLZ MAINTENANCE 90119 66.02 4219 PHONG, LORRAINE EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 90120 43.44 1019 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALIFORNIA PHOTO SUPPLIES · 90121 68079 311 PICONE PLUMBING CORPORATION PLUNGING REPAIR L SUPPLIES 90122 108.97 2682 POSTAGE BY PHONE POSTAGE METER MONTHLY SERVICES 90123 48000.00 (<( 9OlZ~ - 90124 ))) 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES · 90125 860.35 1077 PlYOR REPORT, THE SUBSCRIPTION 90126 79.00 1690 R & R LIGHTING MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES I 90127 28054.56 4025 R J SUPPLY COe MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 90128 62.81 418 R n i GROUP SOIL TESTING SERVICES I 90129 2,606.50 2705 ReNeFet INC. VEHICLE RAINY SERVXCELSUPPLZES 90130 67.15 2496 RANCHO GRANDE KIMANZS MEMBERSHIP DUES 90131 lO0.O0 8078 RANCHO PEDXATRXC ASSOC. BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS 90132 49.32 4130 RBN LOCg L KEY SERVICE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 90133 14.01 545 RED MING SHOE STORE SAFETY BOOTS t 90134 2,152.95 1165 RICHARDSON AUTO BODY, INto VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 90135 1,285.23 276 RIVERSIDE DLUEPRZNT PRINTS I 90136 35.13 626 ROBLES, MAUL PeW SRe TIRE REPAIR 90137 60.00 4047 S L N PLASTICS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 90136 29.37 1370 ~ALXSBUIT, TON Je RECREATION REFUNDS 90139 137.28 1381 SAN eERN CO ENVZIONe HEALTH SVCSo PERMiT/UNDERGROUND STORAGE TKS 90140 473.00 · m, · & · · · · · CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIODS 09-21-94 (94195) RUN DATE: 09/21/96 PAGE: VENDOR NAME ITEN DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. ANT, 3Ol SAN RERN CQ SHERIFFS 581 SAN DERNARDINO COUNTY 132 SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COw INC IOT9 SATSUNA SUSHI 8086 SAULSt REX 8Oez SHAHROCK SHOUS 8082 SHEPHERD OF THE HZLLS CHURCH 2507 SZENE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS 317 SO CALZP EDISON 1017 SOLIS, JOTCE 1013 SOLIS, RICHARD 1432 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 397 SOUTHERN DATA SYSTEMS 2995 SPACESAVER SYSTEMS, INC. 750 SPECIALTY TYPEHIZTER SERVICE loll STANSELLt TIN 4338 STATE CHEMICAL 1373 STERLING TRUCK EQUXPNENT 8086 SUNRZZE PHARMACY 836 TARGET SPECIALTY PROOUCTS 4158 VAUGHAN'S SHIRTZ 667 ViSA 2360 VORTEX INDUSTRIES 2052 NAGNER PACIFIC iNC. 678 MARHEN L CO.e CARL 4002 UASTE MANAGEMENT INDUSTRIES 213 MAXTEe KLEEN-LINE CQRP 4320 NZLCO SECURITY T51 NITS 571 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE CAL-ZO PROGRAM MAZNT SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNOS RECREATIO REFUNOS BUSINESS L[CENSE REPUNOS REFUNO PeRHIT DEPOSIT SERVICE/SUPPLIES MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLINGS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATZO REFUNOS HONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS MONTHLY COHPUTER CONTRACT SUPPLIES/SERVICE TTPENRITER SERVICE REFUND PARTIAL PLANNING FEES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNOS NAZNT SUPPLIES O,A.R.E. T-SHIRTS VISA HnNTHLY BILLINGS NAZNT SERVICE L REPAIRS SURVEY SERVICES LIABILITY CLAIMS HASTE MANAGEMENT MAZNT SUPPLIES SECURITY SYSTEM LEASE RECREACTZON SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES · , CHECKI OVERLAP I 90161 103e331.00 I 90162 le211.O0 I 90163 327.56 90144 23.60 90165 16.00 90146 10.31 90147 1,000.00 t 90168 1,521o50 90349- 90169 I 90lSO 76e261.93 90151 16.00 90152 16.00 90153 - 90159 · 90160 7e655o89 90161 575.00 90162 650.00 90163 39.00 90164 326.25 90165 213.02 90166 409.46 90161 23.00 e 90166 16eT09.92 90169 4,687.12 e 90170 49.02 · 90171 1,502.36 90112 1t348.00 90113 225.00 90174 54.40 90175 - 90175 >)) I 90176 2,696e36 I 90177 IZO.O0 90178 78.43 e 90119 286.07 620.989.16 TOTAL L · b · I · · t · · J, · · I, L CO P Y h I~ defeck-,-eetere ell ~l~'e$ APPUCATION R)I! ALCOHOUC IIV!IAGI UCINSi(S) To: Department of Alcoholic kvero · Control a ~ 1901 B~oadway S n a Aria ~or Sacramemo, Celif. 9~18 P, Zv,~rslde The undersifned hereby applies for licenses described as follow,: 2. NAME(S) OF APPlICANT(S) BiLINKER RESTAURA~4T CORPOP, ATION ( p- 12 ) le NM Write Ake~e r"le U,m--4e, HeedlN,ete CHllce 0,1v 1. TYPE(S) OF LICENSE(S) FILE NO. "47" On-~al4 C~neral FAring Place, Applied under Sac. 24044 [] Effective Date: Iss~nce 3: TYPE(S) OF TRANSACTION(S) Snc~'!on 2407! RECEIE/, NO .. ,"",// ~ GEOGRAPHICAL CODE 3615~07 Date Issued Tamp. Permit Effective Dale: FEE LIC. 5U,0~, 47 4. Name of Bus/nets 5. Lacelion of Business-Number and Street 10598 !'aotb~Lll BZ,d, City and Zip Cede County Rancho C~c~monqe, ~ 91730 ~ 'e~ard~no 6. If Premises License, Shaw Type of Licen~ 8. Mailing Address (if different from 5)--Number a~ Strut tg2O ~p~ rrem,ay ~]]as Tx 7S240 9, Have you ever b,n convicted of o felony? JlTY OF JUL 2 0 1004 - iTI819ti01LIlU.JJ,I2,i3.I4~JSiI~ AL S 50.60 fT ~ 47 7. Are Premises Inside Cily Limit1? (ramp) tPerm) p~r.~, 10. Have you ever violated any of the provisions of Ihe Alcoholic Beverage Control ACI or reJulations of lhe Department per- Corp. raining to the Act? /r# /-',',~*l,,h,,,, 1 I. Explain a "YES" answer to items 9 or 10 on an a,o~hment which shall be deemed part of Ibis application. J2. Applicant agrees (a) that any manager empioyed in on-sale"licensed premises will hove all the qualifications of a liceneat, and (b) that he will not violate or cause or perrail to be flolated any at the lm'ovis~ons of the Alcoholic Beverage Conlrol Act. 13. STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of ...... O'ram:]~. ........................ Date ....... Z_/'_1._3./_9__4 ........... ,"='-:'::::':,,,r,::'::,:..:,.,.- .....- .....,..-,- - ...., ....... ,., ,.. ............*.:;.T ;. 'Z":~::.?'; ':..'"' +- ..................- ........- ...~ .........Z !' '"' ........................... ~ °" ........... '*' .' ....' ....re, ,k., ,.. ....."' "* ""' ....~- - k'..---~ b· ,...b ,... ..., ........, ..... .,.. ...., ....., ...... '4. ~,~'%~ .,~__.,jj__ - ........... 3~r~!n~_k:_L_mb_one_yZ_A~__s_t_~__~_~_c,.' .....'~ , API~LICATION BY TRANSFEROR 15. STATE OF CAUFORNIA County of ....... J~xaage, ...................... Date ......... 16. Name(s) of Licensee(s) &RTNrr. R INTERNATIO,'~&T, . TNC, dO~ f < ..-., l~J:t~n:, Number and Sheet 18 License Number(s) City and Zip Code 47-241~1g Do Not Write ae[o~ This Li~e; Fer Department Ufe On/y Attached: ~ Recorded notice, ................................................... COPIES ~RZCI ~ Renewal: FN of pD~ ~ ......... ........... , ..................... O~ce ~ ................. }~pI BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION 10598 Foothill Blvd. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Site Location: SWC Foothill/Aspen ~lk CURRENTLY ZONED: Industrial Park, Subarea 7, Industrial Specific Plan Zoning of Adjacent ProDerties: North: Community Commercial, Terra Vista Planned Community South: industrial Park, Subarea 7, Industrial Specific Plan East: |ndustria~ Park, Subarea 7, lndustria~ Specific Plan West: Industrial Park, Subarea 7, Industrial Specific Plan CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: October 5, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager APPOINTMENTS OF CITIZEN AT-LARGE MEMBERS TO SPORTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION The Park & Recreation Commission recommends the approval of James Clopton and Sandie Oerly to the Sports Advisory Committee. They will serve in the capacity as citizens at large. BACKGROUND The Commission interviewed six applicants for these two positions. Commissioners Whitehead and Hahn recommended that these two individuals be appointed to the Sports Advisory Committee. The Commission concurred at their September 15, 1994 meeting. Respectfully submitted, Suzanne Ota Co~mmunity Services Manager SO/kls DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager APPOINTMENT OF MEMBERS TO THE SENIOR COMMITTEE ADVISORY RECOMMENDATION: The Park and Recreation Commission recommends the approval the following individuals to the Senior Advisory Committee: · Tom Baillie · Esther Humphries · Betty Linker · Nancy McCormick · Mabel Mercer · Grace Parker · Kathy Peters · Donald Smith · Dorothy Stanley · Arnold Steenburg · Edna Steenburg · Elmer Steeve · Wilma Steeve · Elbert Wilkerson · Ann Williams of BACKGROUND: Park and Recreation applicants and recommended Advisory Committee. The September 15, 1994 meeting. Respectfully submitted, Sdzanne Ota Com~unit~ Services Manager Commissioner, Ann Punter interviewed 16 all be appointed to the Senior Commission concurred at their SO:th DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director BY: Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HELIPORT AND THE BASING OF A HELICOPTER AT FIRE STATION #174, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the construction of a hellport and the basing of a helicopter at Fire Station #174. BACKGROUND On April 20, 1994, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District approved a sublease and agreement with Mercy Air Service allowing Mercy Air to lease a portion of Fire Station #174 as a base station for their helicopter, as an aircraft parking area, and lodging of their flight crews. Subsequent to the Council°s April 20, 1994, approval, Caltrans Aeronautics Division is requiring a Resolution of the City Council approving the construction of the hellport be submitted with the other application documents - the lease agreement between the District and Mercy Air has not been sufficient to meet their requirements. Res ~ctfully su itted, 1 cl G ez o m t Director chm!nts: Resolution On September 28, 1994, the Planning Commission approved a modification to the original Conditional Use Permit approving the construction of the heliport and basing of the helicopter at the fire station. The Commission also issued a Negative Declaration for the application, providing the required environmental clearance. A RESOLUTION OF ~{E CITY COUNC/L OF ~ CITY OF RANC~O CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, ~ I~E CC~~ON OF A F~.rPORT AND THE BASING OF A F~xCOPTER AT AN EXISTING FIRE STAT/ON (S~IA_T/ON #174), ~ AT ~{E SOU/}MEST CORNER OF M~Lr~ AVENJE AND JERSEY BOUIEVARD WHEREAS, the City of Rancho O~amonga has made public safety a top priority; and WHEREAS, the City b~-~ ocr~]nuou~ly improved its public safety through the construction of new fire stations; and WHEREAS, the fire stations have been designed to aocept emergency medical servioe hericopter landings and takeoffs to improve the response time for transporting critically injured accident victims; and WHEREAS, the Pancho Cucamonga Fire District and Mercy Air Services entered into a lease agreement on April 20, 1994, subject to specific terms and conditions, to base a helicopter and its crew at Fire Station 174, thereby further improving the response time for transporting accident victims. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the CITY COUNC/L of the CITY OF RANC~O CUCAMDNGA, CALIFORNIA, does hereby approve the construction of a heliport and the basing of a helicopter at Fire Station #174, located at the southwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, consistent with the terms of the lease agreement between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District and DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SLEET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN LUIS A. CERDA AND FRANCES G. CERDA, AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN SLEET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT). REONIIENDATION It is reconanended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Luis A. Cerda and Frances G. Cerda, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUII)/AILALYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Luis A. Cerda and Frances G. Cerda have agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to her property. In this regard, Luis A. Cerda and Frances G. Cerda have executed an agreement with the City for installation of improvements and dedication of the right-of-way. William J. ~P~'~eil City Engineer WJO:HM:ly Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM LUIS A. CERDA AND FRANCES G. CERDA, AND ADTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Cerda parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Luis A. Cerda and Frances G. Cerda has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Suzanne Ota, Community Services Manager APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A LEASE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF A PORTION OF COYOTE CANYON SCHOOL SITE WITH LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA (FORMER RUTH MUSSER SCHOOL SITE) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council authorize the execution of a Lease Agreement for use of Coyote Canyon School site with Lewis Homes of California for recreation programs. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS During the past two years, the Community Services Department has conducted recreation programs at the Ruth Musser School site based on a Joint Use Agreement with the Central School District. Construction of the Ruth Musser Middle School has been completed and the District has turned over the temporary portable buildings back to Lewis Homes. The Lease Agreement would allow the City to continue to utilize the Tetra Vista Center for its Playschool and recreation programs at the Coyote Canyon School site. The Lease provides the City with a rent-free month-to-month tenancy of two (2) portable buildings. The City would be responsible for maintenance and repair of the premises and would provide $1 million comprehensive liability insurance coverage. FISCAL IMPACT Funding for this program has been budgeted in Community Services Department's Recreation Fund (Fund 13). Respectfully submitted~ t // "'~ '~ ~ .....i''t ~ ' ~ C- '~-- _ Suzanne Ota, Community ServiC'~s Manager so/k~s Attachment · HYDRANT-~--o, ~ F :ator ::orage._ ~,. :UT-C FF,~,~,'e_,., >, ~r-%,5: :i~.~: so~P.- ..... .......... ~ .... . BIKES.~ ,'-~-, '~ A ,. ',*, ~'- - ' H ' Disaster I ':~ ':': I ELECT' ~UT-OFF SWITCH n .... .I_ ~n..i "'~ : ' ' ' P~K :, ·' ' '~~ ~":~':"':""~"~,'Z~ 'STUDEhT ~ICKLUP, ~ ~ ~ [~ . .... ' ' " I ' ~' ' HYD RANT ~3 ~ ' ~ HardscaP~ Play Area.. \ t17 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Joe Stofa Jr., Associate Engineer AWARD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR 1994/95 FY STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAM AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, WHICH INCLUDES CAPE SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL, FOR THE AMOUNT OF $600,773.00 ($545,848.27 PLUS 10% CONTINGENCY) TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 01-4640-9400 RECOImtENDATION: It is recon~nended that the City Council accept all bids as submitted and award and authorize execution of contract for 1994/95 FY Street Rehabilitation Program at Varius Locations to the lowest responsive bidder, California Pavement Maintenance Co~any, Incorporated, for the amount of $545,848.27 and authorize the Administrative Services Director to expend $660,773.00 ($545,848.27 plus 10% contingency) to be funded from Account No. 01-4640-9400. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Per previous Council action, bids were solicited, received and opened on September 27, 1994, for the subject project. California Pavement Maintenance Combany, Incorporated, is the apparent lowest responsive bidder with a bid amount of $545,848.27 (see attached bid summary). The Engineer's estimate was $746,272.54. Staff has reviewed all bids received and found them to be con~lete and in accordance with the bid requirements. Staff has conl~leted the required background investigation and finds all bidders to meet the requirements of the bid documents. The program currently provides for approximately 40 linear miles of cape and slurry seal. With the success of the coq~etitive bids, staff is currently reviewing the project to extend the scope of the work in the current contract through a change order. It is estimated that another eight to tan miles can be slurry sealed within the existing budgeted amount currently in the account. Respectful-l.V submitted, William '.~O'Neil City Engineer WJO:LRB:sd Attachment Y Bid Opening Dale: September 27, 1994 ilem item Unit nf Nn. I)escripli.n Mc-'islare 2. 3. A II C I) E F G II CaiN: Seal SY Slurry Seal SY Traffic Slriping & Pavcmcnl Markings Slop Marking Sol EA Slop W/Cross Walks EA 4" Broken Yellow LF 4" Double Yellow LF 8" Solid While LF 8" Solid Yellow I.F 12" Solid Yellow LF 8' LcUcr EA CrrY OF RANClIO CIJCAM()N(;A SlIMMARY ()F IqH)I'OSAI,S 1994/95 FISCAl. YEAit PAVEMENT REilAIHIJ'FATION PR()GItAM Engineer's ICstimalc Engineer's Estimale Calif. Pave. Mai.t. !s'stimated Unit Original Iliait Tnlal O~nalllilV Prices Anllmrized Prices Price 26,609 $3.30 $87,809.70 $3.64 $96,856.76 786,668 $0.83 $652,934.44 $0.56 $440,219.4 I SO(N) 54 $48.00 $2,592.00 $55.00 $2.970.(N) 19 $58.00 $1,102.00 $140.00 $2,660.fl0 2,700 $0.06 $ i 62.00 $0.09 $243.0) 200 $0.20 $40.(X) $0.62 $124.0) 150 $0.20 $30.00 $0.49 $73.50 492 $0.20 $98.40 $ I. i0 $54 1.20 1,080 $0.70 $756.00 $ I. 10 $ i, ! 88 .(X) ! 36 $5.50 $748.00 $7.15 $972.40 $746,272.54 $545,848.27 $746,272.54 American Asl)hall, Inc. I Ill il 'i'oh. al I~riccs I~ri(.e $3.48 $92,599.32 $0.60 $468,067.46 $0.(}0 $42.00 $2.268.0) $168.00 $3,192 $0.32 $864.(~) $0.84 $168.(X) $ i .(M $ 156,(X) $1.(M $511.68 $ I.()4 $ I, ! 23.20 $9.45 $1,285.20 $570,234.86 Item Item Unil of No. I)escriplinn Measnre 2. 3, A !l C D E F (; !1 Estimated On:mlilv Cape Seal SY 26,609 Sluny Seal SY 786,668 Traffic Suiping & Pavement Markings Stop Marking Set EA 54 Slop W/Cross Walks EA 19 4" Broken Yellow LF 2,700 4" Double Yellow !.F 20) 8" Solid While l .F 150 8" Solid Yellow l.F 492 12" Solid Yellow LF 1,080 8' l,ellcr EA ! 36 Asphalt Maint. Co. of Calif. Roy Allen Slorry Seal, Inc. Unit Total Unit Total Prices Price Prices Price $3.35 $89,140.15 $4.25 $113,088.25 $0.61 $482,227.48 $0.60 $472,0)0.80 $0.00 $0.01 $55.00 $2,970.00 $55.00 $2,970.00 $130.00 $2,470.00 $140.(}0 $2,660.(X) $0.(D $243.00 $0.(D $243.(X) $0.60 $120.00 $0.62 $124.00 $0.50 $75.00 $0.50 $75.00 $1.25 $615.00 $1.10 $54 1.20 $1.25 $1,350.00 $1.10 $1,188.00 $7.00 $952.(X) $7.15 $972.40 $580,162.63 $593,862.65 HILLSIDE MAP I/ILLS/DE WlLgON 8ANTAN UPLAND' MAP'B' MAP "A~ ~ * ~'" ' ~ LINE GIlt ONTARIO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMOf'~A AREA TO BE RESURFACED CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 94/95 PAVEMENT REHAB. VICINITY MAP CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 94/95 PAVEMENT REHAB. MAP "A' 21 CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA 94/95 PAVEMENT REHAB. CITY OF 94/95 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAVEMENT REHAB. CITY OF 94/95 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAVEMENT REHAB. CITY OF 94/95 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PAVEMENT REHAB. - 13 Blvd. ~,. . . Main ~ St ARROW A ~,te'N~et "J~J"--- .... CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAM. 0NGA 94/95 PAVEMENT REHAB. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector~ ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 14365 LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF MOUNTAIN VIEW DRIVE WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE L RECORENDATION: The required street improvements for Tract 14365 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is reconmnended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $26,200, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $262,000. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Tract 14365 - located on the south side of Mountain View Drive west of Milliken Avenue DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91785 Accept: Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) Faithful Performance Bond (Street) Wil 1 iam~O'Neil City Engineer $26,200 $262,000. WJO:SMG: ly Attachment Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 14365 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 14365 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Will te Valbuena, Assistant Engineer A?PROVAL TO VACATE THOMAS STREET FROM CLEVELAND AVENUE TO VINCENT AVENUE, VINCENT AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO THOMAS STREET, SEVENTH STREET FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE TO CLEVELAND AVENUE, CLEVELAND AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO SIXTH STREET, A PORTION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE (GENEP, ALLY THE EASTERLY 6 FEET) FROM SIXTH STREET TO SEVENTH STREET AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SEVENTH STREET AND CLEVELAND AVENUE, AND SETTING THE DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 2, 1994 (APN: 209-272-01, 04, 06 AND 07; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 37 AND 38; 210-361-01 THROUGH 24 AND 26) It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution setting the date of the public hearing for Novent~er 2, 1994, for the vacations of Thomas Street from Cleveland Avenue to Vincent Avenue, Vincent Avenue from Fourth Street to Thomas Street, Seventh Street From Mill iken Avenue to Cleveland Avenue, Cleveland Avenue From Fourth Street To Sixth Street, a portion of Cleveland Avenue (generally the easterly 6 feet) from Sixth Street to Seventh Street and a portion of the northeast corner of Seventh Street and Cleveland Avenue. In addition, said resolution authorizes the City Clerk to cause same resolution to be published 14 days prior to the public hearing. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On April 27, 1994, Planning Conmnission approved Tentative Parcel ~p 14647 which is a subdivision of 380 acres of land into 15 parcels in the General Industrial Designation and the Industrial Park designation of the Industrial Area Specific Plan, bounded on the south by Fourth Street, on the east by Mill iken Avenue, on the north by the A.T.S.F. (~trolink) railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue. A Development Agreement was approved by the City Council for the project on July 20, 1994. One of the conditions of the Tentative Parcel Map is to vacate the three existing streets, Cleveland Avenue, Thomas Street and Vincent Avenue, along with the existing offer of dedication for Seventh Street. L Y CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT October 5, 1994 Page 2 Easements will be provided for all existing utilities, including the public storm drain in Cleveland Avenue, or abandoned as directed by the affected utility companies. Vacated streets will be removed and/or redesignated as private accesses with the golf course development. The application for the street vacations has been submitted and the Develope~ is now requesting the vacations occur. The street vacations are in conformity with the adopted City General Plan and the Industrial Area Specific Plan. Respectful ly submi tt'ed, / Will jam J. O'Neil City Engineer WjO:WV:dlw Attachments CITY OF "ANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINE~t~G DIVISION N 31 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THOMAS STREET FROM CLEVELAND AVENUE TO VINCENT AVENUE, VINCENT AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO THOMAS STREET, SEVENTH STREET FROM MILLIKEN AVENUE TO CLEVELAND AVENUE, CLEVELAND AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO SIXTH STREET, A PORTION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE (GENERALLY THE EASTERLY 6 FEET) FROM SIXTH STREET TO SEVENTH STREET AND A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SEVENTH STREET AND CLEVELAND AVENUE (APN's: 209-272-01, 04, 06 AND 07; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 37 AND 38; 210-361-01 THROUGH 24 AND ?6) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That the City Council hereby elects to proceed under Section 8300, et. seq., of the Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Street Vacation Act of 1941. SECTION 2: That the City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate Thomas Street from Cleveland Avenue to Vincent Avenue, Vincent Avenue from Fourth Street to Thomas Street, Seventh Street from Mill iken Avenue to Cleveland Avenue, Cleveland Avenue from Fourth Street to Sixth Street, a portion of Cleveland Avenue {generally the easterly 6 feet) from Sixth Street to Seventh Street and a portion of the northeast corner of Seventh Street and Cleveland Avenue, as shown on Map V-131, on file in the Office of the City C1 erk, 1 egal descriptions, reservations and detail ed sketches of which are attached hereto marked Exhibits "A", "B" and "C" respectively and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 3: That the City Council hereby fixes Wednesday, the 2nd day of November, lgg4, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as the time and place for hearing all persons objecting to the proposed vacations for the purpose of its determining whether said City streets are necessary for present or prospective street purposes. SECTION 4: That the City Street Superintendent shall cause notices to be posted conspicuously along the 1 ine of the streets or part thereof proposed to be vacated at least 14 days before the hearing, not more than 300 feet apart and not less than three signs shall be posted, each of which shall have a copy of this resolution on them and shall have the following title in lettering not less than one inch in height: "NOTICE OF HEARING TO VACATE STREET". CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. October 5, 1994 Page 2 SECTION 5: The subject vacations shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 6: The Mayor shall sign this Resolution and the City Clerk shall attest to the same, and the City Clerk shall cause same to be published 14 days before the date set for the hearing, at least once in Inland Vall Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City oe~ Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Cali fornia. EYd-IIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR THE FULL VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE FROM FOURTH STREET TO SIXTH STREET, AND PARTIAL VACATION FROM SIXTH STREET TO SEVENTH STREET PORTIONS OF LOTS 7, 10. 15.19.22. THE SOUTH I/'2 OF LOT 26. LOT 27 AND LOT 30 OF SECTION 13 OF THE MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS AS SHO~ BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS AT PAGE 9. RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8889 AS SHO,~' BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 92 OF MAPS AT PAGES 46 THROUGH 47, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. TOGETHER W'ITH A PORTION OF PARCEL MAP NO. 4907 AS SHO~'N BY MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 52 OF MAPS AT PAGES 54 THROUGH 55, RECORDS OF SAID COUq',,TTY. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "A": BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SEVENTH STREET AS SHOWN BY PARCEL MAP NO. 6194, ON FILE IN BOOK 66 OF PARCEL MAPS AT PAGES 66 THROUGH 70, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. W'ITH THE CENTERLINE OF CLEVELAND AVENUE AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP: THENCE SOUTH 85° 52' 05" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY PROLONGATION A DISTANCE OF 30.08 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CLEVELAND AVENUE AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS; THENCE NORTH 00° 06' 34" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 25.88 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00° 06' 34" WEST CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED TLrNE 29, 1981 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 81-142194, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 85° 52' 05" WEST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENT NO. 81-142194 A DISTANCE OF 0.91 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 77.00 FEET. A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 53° 38' '~'~" EAST; ALPHA DWG PArLEGAL 12600 ICLEVAC WP THENCE SOUTHEASTERLy ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CL'RVE THROUGH., CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01o 09' 16". AN ARC LENGTH OF 1.55 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL "B" BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF SIXTH STREET W'ITH THE CENTERLINE OF CLEVELAND AVENUE AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP OF CUCA.MONGA LANDS; THENCE NORTH 00o 06~ 34" WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CLEVELAND AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 29.70 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 53' 26" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CLEVELAND AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 00o 06' 34" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAy LINE A DISTANCE OF 37.95 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 00o 06' 34" WEST CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1243.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 09° 53' 27" WEST A DISTANCE OF 26.85 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 88.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10° 00' 01 ". AN ARC LENGTH OF 15.36 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 6.00 FEET WESTERLY. MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, FROM SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 00o 06' 34" EAST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 1185.70 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 41° 24' 34". AN ARC LENGTH OF 17.35 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL"C": BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF FOURTH STREET WITH THE INTERSECTION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP OF ALPHA D~G,PAI~LEGAL 126001 CLEVAC ~h'P 2 CUCAMONGA LANDS: THENCE NORTH 00° 06' 32" WEST ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID FOURTH STREET. SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE SOUTH 89° 22' 39" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 63.75 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGINNING OF CURVE BEARS SOUTH 00o 37' 21" WfEST, SAID BEGINrNING OF CURVE BEING ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CLEVELAND AVENUE AS SHOWN BY SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 4907; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE AND ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89° 16' 07", AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.16 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 06' 32" WEST CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 583.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH HALF OF LOT 26; THENCE NORTH 89° 24' 52" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 14.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CLEVELAND AVENUE AS SHOWN BY SAID MAP OF CUCAMONGA LANDS; THENCE NORTH O0° 06' 32" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 331.67 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTH I/2 OF LOT 26: THENCE SOUTH 89° 26' 04" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 14.00 FEET TO EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF CLEVELAND AVENUE AS SHOWN BY SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 8889; THENCE NORTH 00o 06' 32" WEST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1574.47 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 34' 44", AN ARC LENGTH OF 37.94 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SIXTH STREET AS SHOWN BY SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 8889; THENCE NORTH 89° 31' 46" WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 136.01 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE ALPHA DW'G'~PAI',LEGAL\12600 I,CLEVAC WP CONCAVE SOUTHV~'ESTERLy HAVING A RADIUS OF 24.00 FEET. A RADIAL LINE TO SAID BEGIN~'ING OF CURVE BEARS NORTH 00o 28' 14" EAST. SAID BEGIN:'NING OF CURVE BEING ALSO ON THE WESTERLy RIGHT-OF-W'Ay LINE OF CLEVELAND AVENUE AS ESTABLISHED BY DOCUMENTS RECORDED AUGUST 18. 1982 AS INSTRUMENT NOS. 82-162137 THROUGH 82-162144. INCLUSIVE, RECORDS OF SAID COL,~Ty: THENCE SOUTHEASTERLy ALONG SAID NON-TANGENT CURVE AND ALONG SAID WESTERLy RIGHT-OF-W'Ay LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89° 25' 12". AN ARC LENGTH OF 37.46 FEET; - THENCE SOUTH O0o 06' 32" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLy RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE AND THE W~ESTERLy RIGHT-OF-WAy LINE AS ESTABLISHED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED MARCH 25, 1974, IN BOOK 8395, PAGE 671, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, A DISTANCE OF 2489.59 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLy HAVING A RADIUS OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLy ALONG SAID CURVE AND CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLy RIGHT-OF-WAy LINE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 44' 24", AN ARC LENGTH OF 31.67 FEET TO SAID NORTHERLy RIGHT-OF-WAy LINE OF FOURTH STREET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 22' 08" EAST ALONG SAID NORTHERLy RIGHT-OF-WAy LINE OF FOURTH STREET A DISTANCE OF 64.26 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. EXHIBIT "B" RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE VACATION OF CLEVELAND AVENUE THE VACATION OF THE STREET DESCRIBED ABOVE PERTAINS ONLY TO THE USE OF SAID LAND FOR STREET PURPOSES. ALL UTILITY USES ARE RETAINED AND EXCEPTED THAT EXIST BY DEED ON THE DATE OF RECORDING HEREOF. ALPHA ,DWG',PA'PLEGAL 12600 I'CLEVAC WP /* 37 E X HI BIT" C" S~T , o~ ~ 53'38'22"E(2R~ N 85"52'05'W 0.91 ~N 00'06'34.'W 1.19 =01'09'16' R=77.00 L,=1.55 ,.T.P.O.B, T=0.78 · SEE DETAIL ~' 'j''\ ~ o~%o,~;~',~ SEVENTH ST. PA!~. A PAR. A Z I 30" SEVEN L=15,36 T=7.70 PARCEL Z --- PARCEL "B" PARCEL 11 T'~3P'D'B' b=41. E4 '34' 00'06 '34'¥ .$.: 7.9s SIXTH ST. N 2 7~~2G oooo6 '34'~ N 8~ 'e6'[ POD9' - _ . . S ARE BASE0 ON THE PAR. B EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, T. 1S.,R7W, BEING N00'05'e3'W PER e.S. 92/17 EXHIBIT 'C' PARCEL 5 N 89°31 '46'¥ / / / / // ~// ,,,,,/ *~/ ~90a34'44· R=84 O0 L=37:94 T=a4,24 / / /P z SIXTH SHEET 3 OF STREET PARCEL //~./-PARCEL "C" N O0 06~38°~AA /t 331.67 //~ QUARTER ~ ~CTIDN 13, T. 1~., R7 i, / / IEI~ N00'05'83'~ ~R ~.~. 98/17 //~ ~90m44~4· ~ z ~e9· 1 &' 07' ~20. oo ~80. oo .T~19.75 ~ FOURTH STREET 4 7 N SO. O0 T.P.O.B. P.O.B. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECt: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke the Conditional Use Permit for the operation of a bar in conjunction with a restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from September 21, 1994.) ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE - A request to revoke an Entertainment Permit for a bar and restaurant in the Neighborhood Commercial District, located at the northwest corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets - APN: 201-811-56 through 60. (Continued from September 21, 1994.) RECO~[~A~ION Staff ~tcomends that the City Council adopt the two resolutions attached to this r_~Fj~rt. At the ~meeting of September 21, 1994, the applicant stated that he would withdraw from having entertainment in his restaurant and the serving of hard liquor/~n his bar. Based on his desire and intended action, the City Council does not need to take action on the revocation hearing, but needs to adopt the attache~ resolutions accepting the applicant's relinquishment of his Conditij3~al Use Permit and Entertainment Permit. Respec- 11~ Brad BuL]~ler City Planner BB:NF/i~ Attachments: Resolutions A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLINING TO REVOKE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 78-03 AND ACCEPTING T~E APPLICANT ' S RELINQUISHMENT OF SAID PERMIT FOR THE OPERATION OF A BAR IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 19TH AND CARNELIAN STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60. A. Recitals. 1. On December 27, 1978, the Planning Con~nission adopted Resolution No. 78-40 conditionally approving a restaurant with a bar and entertainment at 6620 Carnelian Street, formerly kno~n~ as the Boar's Mead and presently Sam's Place. : 2. On October 27, 1982, the planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 82-98 modifying the permit by adding conditions of approval to alleviate public nuisance problems as a result of consistent complaints from adjacent residents. Two conditions of approval irequired the applicant to install "No Parking" signs at the northwest parking area to prohibit employees and patrons from parking in that area and to place large trees and chain barriers across the drive aisles to block access into this parking area. The applicant failed to comply with these two conditions. 3. On September 28, 1983, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 83-117 modifying the permit to require the implementation of a d~nner menu, additional noise attenuation measures, and the hours of operanlon to close at 11 p.m. 4. On July 10, 1985, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 83-117A modifying the permit by prohibiting entertainment uses. The conditions of approval in Planning Commission Resolution No. 82-98, as referenced in Section A.2, were to remain in effect. 5. On January 2, 1991, the Council adopted Resolution No. 91-007 denying the applicant's request to extend the hours of operation. The conditions of approval in Planning Commission Resolutions No. 78-40, 82-98, and 83-117A, as referenced in Sections A.1 through A.4, were to remain in effect. 6. On December 4, 1991, the Council adopted Resolution No. 91-381 to modify the permit by approving the extension of the hours of operation from 11 p.m. to 2 a.m., Monday through Saturday and eliminating the condition of approval prohibiting entertainment uses. The City Council also adopted Resolution No. 91-382 to approve the associated Entertainment Permit 91-02 to allow entertainment uses consisting of a duet. The conditions of approval in Planning Commission Resolution No. 82-98, as referenced in Section A.2, were to remain in effect. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE October 5, 1994 Page 2 7. On January 12, 1994, the City of Rancho Cucamonga gave notice to Sam's Place for immediate compliance with the conditions of approval as referenced above and attached hereto. 8. On January 24, and February 14, 1994, site inspections were conducted and the site was found to be in non-compliance with the conditions of approval. 9. On March 23, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the revocation of the Conditional Use Permit for non-compliance of conditions of approval, and following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted Resolution No. 94-21, thereby revoking said permit. The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed to this Council. 10. On May 4, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued it to September 21, 1994, with the condition that the applicant comply with all conditions of approval within one week from the May 4, 1994 date, and that the hours of operation cease at midnight effective immediately. 11. On June 1, 1994, the City Council reopened the public hearing to check for compliance with those terms imposed on May 4, 1994, and continued the hearing to September 21, 1994. 12. On September 21, and continued to October 5, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded the hearing. 13. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings, including written staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. This permit applies to property located at 6620 Carnelian Street and is presently improved with a shopping center; and b. The property to the north is vacant and planned for a future freeway, the properties to the south and east are existing shopping centers, and the property to the west is single family residences; and CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CUP 78-03 - SAM'S PLACE October 5, 1994 Page 3 c. In response to complaints from adjacent residents, the applicant was sent a notice by letter, dated May 7, 1992, reminding him to comply with and adhere to all the conditions of approval as contained in City Council Resolutions No. 91-381 and 91-382, and Planning Commission Resolution No. 82-98. Conditions of approval included: posting permanent "No Parking" signs at the northwest parking area; installing physical barriers with landscaping and chains to block access into the northwest parking area closest to the adjacent residences; keeping the front and back door closed during business hours except for emergencxes; providing security personnel outside to monitor the parking area; and assisting in averting public nuisance problems, etc.; and 1994, A.2. d. Site inspections on January 6, January 23, and February 14, indicated non-compliance with the conditions referenced in Section The applicant was given notices of non-compliance; and e. At the meeting on March 23, 1994, the Planning Commission revoked the Entertainment Permit, which was timely appealed by the applicant. At the appeal hearing on May 4, 1994, the City Council directed the applicant to comply with all conditions of approval within one week from said date and continued the hearing to September 21, 1994; and f. Based on City Council action of May 4, 1994, inspections were conducted on May 12, May 18, and May 24, 1994, to check the site for compliance with all conditions of approval. The inspections indicated that the applicant has failed to post "No Parking" signs and put up the lockable chain across the drive aisle to prevent access and parking in the northwest parking area; and g. On May 17, 1994, the applicant was given notice of the permit violations and the scheduling of the June 1, 1994 revocation hearing. At the meeting on June 1, 1994, the City Council determined that the applicant has, with a good faith effort, attempted to comply with them. The City Council allowed him to continue the operation of his bar and entertainment, subject to the conditions described in Section A.10, until his lease of the premises expires on September 17, 1994; and h. At the meeting on September 21, 1994, the applicant stated that he wishes to withdraw from conducting his business as a bar and relinquishes his CUP for the serving of alcohol. 3. Based on the applicant's desire and intended action to relinquish his CUP, this Council does not need to take action on the revocation hearing and adopts this resolution accepting the relinquishment of the CUP from the applicant. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLINING TO REVOKE ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT NO. 91-02 AND ACCEPTING THE APPLICANT' S RELINQUISHMENT OF SAID PERMIT FOR A BAR AND RESTAURANT, SAM'S PLACE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CARNELIAN AND 19TH STREETS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 201-811-56 THROUGH 60. A. Recitals. 1. On December 4, 1991, the Ciny Council adopted Resolution No. 91-382 approving Entertainment Permit 91-02, to allow entertainment uses consisting of a duet. 2. On March 8, 1994, the City of Rancho Cucamonga gave notice to the applicant that he violated the Entertainment Permit with the use of a disc jockey. 3- On March 23, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing for the revocation of the Entertainment Permit, and following the conclusion of said hearing, adopted Resolution No. 94-22 thereby revoking said permit- The decision represented by said Planning Commission Resolution was timely appealed to this Council. 4. On May 4, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and continued it to September 21, 1994, with condition that the applicant comply with all conditions of approval within one week from the May 4, 1994 date and that the hours of operation cease at midnight effective immediately. 5. On June 1, 1994, the City Council reopened the public hearing to check for compliance with those terms imposed on May 4, 1994, and continued the hearing to September 21, 1994. 6. On September 21, and continued to October 5, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted and concluded the hearing. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred- B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE October 5, 1994 Page 2 2. Based upon substantial evldence presented to this Council durlng the above-referenced public hearings on June 1 and September 21, 1994, including written staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located at 6620 Carnelian Street and is presently improved with a shopping center; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is vacant and planned for a future freeway, the properties to the south and east are existing shopping centers, and the property to the west is single family residences; and c. In response to complaints from adjacent residents, the applicant was sent a notice by letter, dated May 7, 1992, reminding him to comply with, and adhere to, all the conditions of approval as contained in City Council Resolution No. 91-382; and d. Newspaper advertisements in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin indicated that entertainment such as live bands, disc jockeys with karaoke, and lingerie shows were offered at Sam's Place. On June 22, 1993, the applicant was notified to cease all illegal entertainment except for the approved duet. Despite repeated contacts, the violations continued as evidenced by the newspaper advertisement for entertainment (such as live bands and disc jockeys) dated August 25, 1993, and verified by site inspections on September 19, and 21, 1993; and e. In response to the City's citation process, the applicant submitted an application to modify the permit to legalize the added entertainment on September 23, 1993; and f. On January 5, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-004 denying the applicant's request, except for karaoke. The approved entertainment consists of a duet and karaoke; and g. Site inspections on January 24, and 26, 1994, and illegal signs retrieved in the City on March 10, 1994, indicated that the applicant continued to violate this permit with the use of disc jockeys. A notice of permit violations and a notice of the scheduled March 23, 1994 revocation hearing was sent to the applicant on March 8, 1994; and h. At the meeting on March 23, 1994, the Planning Commission revoked the Entertainment Permit, which was timely appealed by the applicant. At the appeal hearing on May 4, 1994, the City Council directed the applicant to comply with all conditions of approval within one week from said date and continued the hearing to September 21, 1994; and i. Based on City Council action of May 4, 1994, inspections were conducted on May 12, May 18, and May 24, 1994, to check the site for compliance with all conditions of approval. The inspections indicated that CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION EP 91-02 - SAM'S PLACE October 5, 1994 Page 3 the applicant has failed to post "No Parking" signs and put up the lockable chain across the drive aisle to prevent access and parking in the northwest parking area; and j. On May 17, 1994, the applicant was given notice of the permit vlolations and the scheduling of the June 1, 1994 revocation hearing. At the meeting on June 1, 1994, the City Council determined that the applicant has, with a good faith effort, attempted to comply with them. The City Council allowed him to continue the operation of his bar and entertainment, subject to the conditions described in Section A.10, until his lease of the premises expires on September 17, 1994; and k. At the meeting on September 21, 1994, the applicant stated that he wishes to withdraw from having entertainment, except for Karaoke for his restaurant, and relinquishes his Entertainment Permit. 3. Based on the applicant's desire and intended action to relinquish his Entertainment Permit, this Council does not need to take action on the revocation hearing and adopts this resolution accepting the relinquishment of the Entertainment Permit from the applicant. 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: October 5, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner LANDMARK DESIGNATION 94-02 - CAMPOS - Consideration of an application to designate 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard as either an Historic Landmark or an Historic Point of Interest - APN: 208-153-08, 09, 10, and 11. R~O~D~L~ION The Historic Preservation Co~nission recommends that the City Council designate 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard as Historic Landmarks through adoption of the attached Resolution. ANALYSIS General - The applicant is requesting Landmark Destination of four single-story bungalows on Foothill Boulevard. The four houses, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Klusman Avenues, were built between 1916 and 1927. The houses were part of the "Old Cucamonga" block over which John Klusman's influence once extended. In 1990, these houses were being considered as part of the establishment of the Estacia Court Historic Overlay District. The Historic Preservation Commission, however, felt that preservation might be accomplished on a case-by-case basis rather than the creation of an overlay district. Historic Significance - All four structures were surveyed by the City in 1987. Three of the four structures were determined to be potential local landmarks. Individually, however, the houses do not represent a significant architectural contribution. The Historic Preservation Commission, both in 1990 and 1994, stated the houses derive their significance from the context and setting of the homes. As the widening of Foothill Boulevard over the years has resulted in the demolition of homes along the corridor, this block has remained intact and is a good example of the development from the 1910s and 1920s and of the Craftsman bungalow architectural style. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT LD 94-02 - CAMPOS October 5, 1994 Page 2 Pending Application - The applicant has submitted development plans for the site including the restoration of the four houses and their conversion to commercial uses. The retention of the homes is consistent with the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan which promotes the incorporation of existing cultural and historic structures into new developments. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan reinforces the significance of the bungalows be designating them as "notable structures." Respec ly submi ted, BB:SM:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Historic Preservation Commission Staff Report of July 13, 1994 Exhibit "B" - Historic Preservation Commission Resolution No. 94-05 Resolution to Designate Structures as Historic Landmarks DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: July 13, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT Chairman and Members of the Historic Preservation Con~nission Brad Buller, City Planner Scott Murphy, Associate Planner LANDMARK DESIGNATION 94-02 CAMPOS - Consideration of an application to designate 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard as either an Historic Landmark or an Historic Point of Interest - APN: 208-153-08, 09, 10, and 11. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single family residential; Specialty Commercial (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea 3) South - Fast food restaurant; Specialty Con~nercial (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea 3) East - Abandoned gas station; Specialty Commercial (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea 3) West - Single family residential; Specialty Commercial (Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, Subarea 3) General Plan Designations: Project Site - Commercial North - Commercial South - Commercial East - Commercial West - Commercial Site Characteristics: The site is presently developed with four single family residences and a cafe. None of the structures are presently occupied. ANALYSIS: General: The applicant is requesting the designation of four sing!e-story bungalows on Foothill Boulevard as an Historic Landmark. House No. 1 is located at 9618 Foothill Boulevard, consists of 1,065 square feet, and was constructed in 1917. House No. 2, located at 9626 Foothill Boulevard, was also constructed in 1917 and totals 958 square feet in area. House No. 3, 9634 Foothill HISTORI~ P.~ESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 94-02 - CAM_DOS July 13, 1994 Page 2 Boulevard, is the oldest in the group dating back to 1916 and has 1,296 square feet in area. Finally, House No. 4, 9642 Foothill Boulevard, has 1,550 square feet and was constructed in 1927. The units were used as residences until the end of 1993. The houses are now vacant. B. Estacia Court Historic Overlay District: In 1990, the Historic Preservation Coumlission considered the possibility of creating an Historic Overlay District for the block bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Archibald Avenue, Estacia Court, and Klusman Avenue. This area came to be known as "Estacia Court." The Connission noted that the real significance of the area was the spatial arrangement and the setting of the structures. At that time, however, the Commission felt that other priorities should be pursued and that preservation of Estacia Court might be completed on a case-by-case basis rather than by the creation of an overlay district. C. Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan: During the creation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan (FBSP), the City identified the potential historic value of the structures within the Specific Plan area. A number of policies are included in the FBSP to address the cultural and historical impact of Foothill Boulevard. These policies include: Promote commercial characteristics. clusters sensitive to the historical Establish land uses to complement existing cultural and historical resources. Require new projects to incorporate existing cultural and historical structures. To address these policies, the FBSP selected a "Specialty Commercial" designation to "promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience unique to a particular subarea." Because the FBSP identified the Foothill bungalows as "notable structures," the Specialty Commercial designation was applied to this block. D. Historical Significance: All four of the structures were surveyed in 1987. Houses No. 1, 2, and 4 were considered potential local landmarks. House No. 3 was listed as "surveyed, undetermined significance." Individually, the four houses do not represent a significant architectural contribution. The houses derive their significance from the context and setting of the houses. These units were part of the block identified as "Old Cucamonga." In the 1930s, John Klusman's sphere of influence extended to this area as he purchased a number of the houses in the Estacia Court block. He later built a number of bungalows along Foothill Boulevard to the west of the block. The majority of these homes were used by area workers. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 94-02 - CAMPOS July 13, 1994 Page 3 Over the years, the widening of Foothill Boulevard has seen the demolition of a number of homes along the corridor. The redeve!opment of the commercial properties has also resulted in the removal of many of the Foothill bungalows. The Estacia Court block is one of the last intact examples of housing development from the late 1910s and early 1920s and of the Craftsman bungalow architectural style· Further, the block represents a portion of the "Old Cucamonga" downtown that has not been redeveloped. Pending Development Application: The applicant has submitted development plans for the site to include the removal of the diner and the restoration of the four houses and their conversion to commercial uses. If the Historic Preservation Commission designates the four houses as Landmarks, a Landmark Alteration Permit will be processed with the Development Review. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: In order for the Historic Preservation Commission to recommend designation of the properties as Landmarks, facts to support the following findings may be made: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare and the proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once co~non but is now rare. The proposed Landmark was connected to someone renowned, important, or a local personality. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting: The proposed Landmark materially character of the neighborhood. benefits the historic The proposed Landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, co,m-unity, or city. As identified in the analysis, staff believes that facts to support the findings can be made for each and every finding required. The craftsman bungalows in this area were indicative of the homes of the later 1910s and the 1920s. Because of the improvements to Foothill Boulevard, many of these early homes have been demolished. Estacia Court represents one of the remaining neighborhoods that is virtually intact from the original neighborhood. Designating the buildings as a Landmark will HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION STAFF REPORT LD 94-02 - CAMPOS July 13, 1994 Page 4 reinforce their historical significance in the block and surrounding neighborhood. The site was also under John Klusman's control and influence during the 1930s. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: Landmark designation Ks exempt under Section 15308 of the California Environmental Quality Act. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Hlstoric Preservation Commission recommend approval of Landmark Designation 94-02 to the City Council. lneRespec ty subm"tted, BB:SM/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Location Map Exhibit "B" - Building Photographs Resolution Recou[nending Approval HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Address: _gL~ I ~ FO~ T7-/// {_ AP# Date of Photo view Looking Date of Photo Page__ of Page__ LJH3 ~54 [{/STORIC PRESERVATION CCMMISSION Address: LANDMARK S U R V E Y Date of Photo view Leoking Date of Photo Page of Page__ LJH3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION LANDMARK SURVEY Add r e s s: 9e3 4- ~'~297'~/IL / AP # 2D~-153 - View Looking M . Date of Photo Date of Photo Page__ of Page__ LJH3 ~ Address: 9~ Z ~O(D'F~ILL APe / View Looking K%/3KTH . Date of Photo Date of Photo Page__ of Page__ LJH3 57 RESOLUTION NO. 94-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 94-02 TO DESIGNATE FOUR HOUSES LOCATED AT 9618, 9626, 9634, AND 9642 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AS LOCAL LANDMARKS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-153-08, 09, I0, AND I1. A. Recitals. 1. Ana Campos has filed an application for approval of Landmark Designation No. 94-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of July and continued to the 27th day of July and the lOth day of August 1994, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. occurred. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 13, July 27, and August 10, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The appXications applies to property Xocated on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Klusman Avenues at 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard; and b. The properties to the north and west of the subject site are designated for specialty commercial uses and are developed with single family residences. The property to the south is designated for commercial uses and is developed with a fast food restaurant. The property to the east is designated for specialty commercial uses and contains an out-of-use, potential historic gas station; and c. The application contains four single family residences that were built between 1916 and 1927; and d. The block bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Archibald and Klusman Avenues, and Estacia Street is one of the remaining intact neighborhoods from the late 1910s and the 1920s; and LD ~4-C2 - Ck~POS August I0, 1994 Page 2 e. The Craftsman bungalows were indicative architectural style of the late 19lOs and the 1920s; and of the f. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan bungalows as notable structures; and identifies the g. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan encourages the establishment of land uses to complement existing cultural and historic resources; and h. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan requires new projects to incorporate existing cultural and historical structures; and i. The site was under the control and influence of John Klusman during the 1930s. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: A. Mistorical and Cultural Significance: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare and the proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or a local personality. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. The proposed Landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city· 4. This Commission hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as Landmark Designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308. LD 94-32 - AuguSt 10, !994 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby recommends approval of the appllcat~on subject to ~he following condition: The houses shall be restored/rehabilitated consistent with the architectural style and details of the era of construction. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS iOTH DAY OF AUGUST 1994. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA McNiel, Chairman ATTEST I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Historic Preserve=ion Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation COMeSliOn held on the 10th day of August 1994, by the following AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LUMPP, MCNIEE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MELCHER ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, TOLSTOY A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF HISTORIC LANDMARK 94-02 TO DESIGNATE FOUR HOUSES LOCATED AT 9618, 9626, 9634, AND 9642 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AS LOCAL LANDMARKS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 208-153-08, 09, 10, AND 11 . A. Recitals. 1. Ana Campos has filed an application for approval of Landmark Designation No. 94-02 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Landmark Designation request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of July and continued to the 27th day of July and the 10th day of August 1994, the Historic Preservation Co~nission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. On the 5th day of October 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5 occurred. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearings on October 5, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applications applies to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard between Archibald and Klusman Avenues at 9618, 9626, 9634, and 9642 Foothill Boulevard; and b. The properties to the north and west of the subject site are designated for specialty co~nercial uses and are developed with single family residences. The property to the south is designated for commercial uses and is developed with a fast food restaurant. The property to the east is designated for specialty conmlercial uses and contains an out-of-use, potentially historic gas station; and 81 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LD 94-02 - CAMPOS October 5, 1994 Page 2 c. The application contains four single family residences that were built between 1916 and 1927; and d. The block bounded by Foothill Boulevard, Archibald and Klusman Avenues, and Estacia Street is one of the remaining intact neighborhoods from the late 1910s and the 1920s; and e. The Craftsman bungalows were indicative architectural style of the late 1910s and the 1920s; and of the f. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan identifies bungalows as notable structures; and the establishment of resources; and The Foothill Boulevard land uses to complement Specific Plan encourages the existing cultural and historic h. The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan requires new projects to incorporate existing cultural and historical structures; and i. The site was under the control and influence of John Klusman during the 1930s. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of fact set forth in paragraph 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: A. Historical and Cultural Significance: The proposed Landmark is particularly representative of an historic period, type, style, region, or way of life. The proposed Landmark is an example of a type of building which was once common but is now rare and the proposed Landmark is connected with a business or use which was once common but is now rare. The proposed Landmark was connected with someone renowned, important, or a local personality. B. Neighborhood and Geographic Setting. The proposed Landmark materially benefits the historic character of the neighborhood. The proposed Landmark, in its location, represents an established and familiar visual feature of the neighborhood, community, or city. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. LD 94-02 - CAMPOS October 5, 1994 Page 3 4. This Council hereby finds that the project has been reviewed and considered in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as Landmark Designations are exempt under CEQA, per Article 19, Section 15308. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby resolves that pursuant to Chapter 2.24 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby approves the application subject to the following condition: 1) The houses shall be restored/rehabilitated consistent with the architectural style and details of the era of construction. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. The City Clerk this Council shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. DATE: TO: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 5, 1994 STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: BY: Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: UPDATE BY MARKS CABLEVISION At the June 1 City Council meeting, Mr. William Marks Sr., owner of Marks CableVision, outlined several problems that the cable company was experiencing in combining two cable systems into one system. Mr. Marks referred to reception difficulties, billing problems and complications with the phone system. Realizing that the cable company had undertaken a major project and that some problems, at least initially, were inevitable, the Council requested that Mr. Marks return to the Council in 90 days to provide them with an update of cable issues. At the request of Mr. Marks, the item was continued from the September 7 meeting. Below is a tabulation of phone calls received by the City over the past several months. March April May June July August September 1 - 26 38 calls received 97 calls received 37 calls received 61 calls received 28 calls received 48 calls received 27 calls received William Marks Sr. has provided the Council with a timeline as to the steps the cable company has taken in its effort to upgrade the cable system. The timeline is attached for the Council's reference. Also attached is a phone statistics report provided by Marks Cablevision. This report details the number of calls received, number of customer service representatives answering the phones, delay time in answering, etc. Marks CableVision continues to work with staff in resolving cable issues as they occur. MARKS CABLEVISION TIME TABLE FEBRUARY: · February 1 - Marks CableVision purchases Simmons Cable MARCH: March 1 - 10 - All channels are "opened" in north Rancho Cucamonga for previous tiered subscribers at no charge for 30 to 40 days to sample the new Marks CableVision basic service. Customers were notified at least 30 days in advance of this change. A local 1-800 phone number is implemented. APRIL: Billing cycles are changed according to geographic region for simplicity. All south Rancho customers are billed on the 1 st of each month. All north Rancho customers are billed on the 10th of each month. This allows us to distribute phone and work volume more evenly throughout the month to improve efficiency. A fiber optic interconnect is completed connecting the south Rancho system to the north Rancho system. Full Saturday office hours and evening phone hours are implemented. Our new hours are: Office Hours - 9:00am to 6:00pro - Monday through Saturday Phone Hours - 8:00am to 7:00pm - Mort, Tues, Thurs & Fri. 9:00am to 7:00pm - Wednesday 8:00am to 5:00pro- Saturday MAY: · New state of the art addressable converter boxes are distributed to south Rancho residents. June 2 - One channel lineup is created throughout the city. 9 new channels are added to south Rancho line-up 5 new channels are added to north Rancho line-up June 2 - Pay-per-view is made available to south Rancho residents for the first time. Additional outlet fees are reinstated in north Rancho at $4.00 for the second television set, $3.00 for the third set. The fourth, fifth and sixth outlets are flee. This monthly rate is an overall decrease in additional outlet fees for south Rancho customers and an overall decrease in additional outlet fees ~'om what Simmons Cable had been charging last year. Monthly basic service rates are reduced for 10,000 north Rancho customers to $23.65. Rates are adjusted to the same level for south Rancho customers. One uniform rate, service, and technology now exist throughout Rancho Cucamonga. AUGUST: · August 1 - a new convenient and cemrally located office opens at the Terra Vista Town Center. The 19th Street office is closed. SEPTEMBER: September 27 - A fiber optic "node" is installed in the Etiwancla area. At~er the activation of the node, we will be fine tuning the plant in that area for about two weeks, as well as replacing many strands of aged cable. After that two week period, customers will see a significant improvement in picture quality and a reduction in outages. Weee Dee lemq I 10 $ 10 10 1o I 10 I 10 I 9 10 9 10 I ,J lo 12 13 13 9.41 w camv 810 649 10% 22 29S 193 e41, 12 F. 1~ ,led ,2.7% 77 Ires 4 I% 94 65% 1210 976 1111 234 19 1112 1499 M11 223 13 19(4 151e 77~ 450 1237 M 0% M QO~ , 919 171 N~ 41 1~9 1236 92% ~03 1~1 9M 75~ ~4 ~.3~ 1~ 11~ 8i~ 114 13 1139 1~ ~ 88% 139 12 2~ ~ e;9 ~ 161 578 516 69~ 62 1572 1313 ~ ~ee ~2 Q~ 11~ 1218 71% 493 28 1391 11~ , 15~ 211 1151 1611 t ~1~ 170 I~5 1154 : Is~ 201 1~9 ~1 ~ II~ 152 14 1334 11~ H~ 114 13 I~ 1451 , 93% 115 1135 11373 ~ 95~ 42 31,091 21,161 ~ 13% 4,714 12.3% 55 5 rll 152 28~ f~ 34'~ 139 34'~ 152 :33% 166 23% 207 303 31'~ 254 I~0 36~ 221 151 313% 236 lu 28% 243 166 224 ,10% 226 223 32% 281 217 22~ 280 221 40% 232 215 220 364 221 334 244 21% XI 153 54% 221 95 d;,~ 243 139 LI% 221 t59.67241 31% 221 0141,ti weee, 07lX4e 'rlsert 07~1'/14 a'ff/Ivle v~ v~llei4 f..d. ~.7/2:544 10 I 1514 12 I1 1301 12 t~l I q~!2 J TemlcalB kmmxmleee ~ Cale Calle ~le Dele~e~ aeeeewee cake aammeme Oeleee txemee Caeraee, I S7& ~ ~ 1:~ I13mi 411 I1 I~l ;~1 it31 rz3 N1 11,1, IQ'11 ~eee ell e~ 7Ill m 24111 I13w6 32'/ 11 313' ~0 ~ Ill II, mlll~ i,il /,L13'!~ 311 ~ 14.1o, I, 4.,11 .17 ~ 1'41, ,~ ~ ,gwe 34. r4, IM ~1 ale,e- TIll M.l 244 311, 213 124 34t, ~ ~ 21'1 :b ~ 242 I~ ~ 111 13 ~ 211 4m 711, 212 ~la S1~ ~J1 71 ll~ ~ tl lei ' 1~7 ~ 241 54 ~ 242 U 113 Day of Stalling Told Calla Told Cage ~ of Told Ca0e Wak Dale le:ee - It-eel Recdved Answered Cage Answ~'ed Ab, andond ~' ' ~ ':i~" ' '~::' ~ ;::~"~' ""."~;' ~.~ .~ !,~, 'D:! .... . ..... :, ..,~.,. Ttmm. 06r30/94 Weds. 08/31/04 MontMy TOTAL ERR t:RR :ii ,: !i : : ;;'!; i;:ii:!~ !~;~:: .. . 4t7 ~.61 ~ ~.~ i~ 10.~ ~1 41.~ E~ ' ;;' :: ;;~:~"':~: :~ :~ : ~' ":: ~ ~ 'TT::';~ . ERR ERR 10l ~.S~ 176 8t 5.e% ~1 ~ ~2-4% ~ ~.~ , .: .--, ,~..--;::-.: .......:.., ,.~: - .....~:-,,. 2 0.~ ~ ERR ERR ERR ERR : :. :.: .. ~: ERR ERR E~R ERR ERR ERR [::hR ERR ERR fate ;:!:;.'~:.;.i ~ii;:'E "[RR EhR ERR · ':.~::' : ~, ~ ?~'.:!. i!: ;;:!, ... : :? !62 15% 24! ": ..... ::i_!i :;i:~:':!: 2': i:::!':; :~i~:EiE;' :' ::~, .., ISS 1411, 2211 IN 2'7~ · 42 8,i~ 76 ~II, 191 !; ..... ~ ; ~ ~ , _ "13S 43% ' 2i2 103 41% 18;! 73 74% 186 43 87% 18S ;: : '.: i - ~L!:. .. . .!:. !. ! _:iE~i.·: .... :;i!': :E -~: · i.':-!i : . · . ::: E~: ~ .:. i' :.~ :~!:: .' ...:" .. "~:';":!!':;~o~.' =": :': .:,.-.:;.?;!::~=!i~ ::,: . .;.?..:;;: ~ ::!;;:!;:: tl 'ib'?0 I1~ )3% t3 1343 Itte tell, t3 J4d2 122t iT'll, 0 fltn i~!~,~;~i ':i~: '~i.::':;~s:.:;::: ~iii':::;~:';::i:':'i!:;:::i.';.:i. ::..:i~:i ~!~.:~iT~}T~?:.~:-: ~ :E::- ~:i!: :i: i:!i!~:;';::!; ~ .: . ERR t3 1080 950 t3 823 112 t2 10S4 ~ It t3~ 1182 O tt80 164~ 811[, :;i:-!:ii ' z! i~:" :-; ;:": !, .~:; ":;.~E .~!:;~".;' ...., t2 t~l 1~ 8416 13 iIIlTI 1310 81% 12 t'1~ toee ~1i, i3 878 876 IIXI% 0 [ERR O ERR ::ii;' .' .:!:! i;' ;.:::': ;Z:::! '; ~:': :.~ i; :i!~ ::i:ii:::iiii:;i .....,~ i:.· ;:r:~i. 0 ERR o [kd 0 [ERR O ERR 0 [ERR 0 r:HI~ [EkR :-,,;:.,;::,,i :!:..:r :i; .: ....;. i,:;:::!::.,. :~ .:,,~..:i.. i:,::,,i!.,::,%.. :. :;:;, ;:i :i.::;!i:: ;,, ::. ::: .:: !!::., i: .:....:;..:, ....;,~,:.,, ;!.. :. O ERR ERR 6 EkR [ERR O ERR ERR ; L:! . -i: .!:., :'..: ;.: .:.'. ii"~ .;.!~i!: !': :ii: '= ':;':' ' . "!T; ::':!;; '~'~.-' ;! -': ':': ' ' . ::-:i!~' 11.785714 le,e3s 16,860 as% 2,775 i4.1~6 :: :' '- : :: 'i:i!:' :.:.:i:: ::!"::. :' ' :> ' ~: " : .ET · Avenge Day ,o4' Ibfflng Total Calla Week D.~te le:.ee - 11:ool R,Kdved THUR 09/01~q FRI 09/02/94 12 1058 ' SAT ..... 09~),i "8 544 TUES 09426/94 13 1492 WED 0g~)7~,l 13 930 THURS 09/08/94 12 836 FRI 09/0g~4 12 1420 SAT 09/10/94 8 547 IdOH 09/12/~4 12 1203 TUE$ 09/13/~1 13 1076 WED 09/14/94 13 1034 ~ 00115/94 12 1077 FRI 0W16/94 12 1256 SAT 09/17/94 8 1396 MC)~ 09/16/9,1 11 832 TUE 09/20/94 ]3 967 WED 09/21/94 12 1~5 "T"HUR 09/22/94 ~ 2 747 FRI 09/23/94 13 ~2 "SA"f"' 09/24/94 ....... 8 ..... 426 MQN 09~26/94 TUE 09/27/94 WED 09/28/94 THUR 09/29/94 FRI 09f30~4 Monthly TOTAL 11.421053 18,580 Totel Calls Minefed MARKS CableVision Phone 8Letistlcs Report I~m'centage of Tolal ClIIs Cells Mlwe'ed .ikandollld 1033 98% 25 ERR ERR 2.4% 214 20.7'2% 535 N% 9 1.7% 1403 9,4% 89 640 1:)% 50 9.7% 816 56% 20 2.4% 1229 87% 191 13.5% 493 90% 54 9.9% 1068 89% 135 11.2% 804 75% 2t'2 25.3% 840 81% 194 18.8% 1017 N% 80 5.6% 1075 86% 181 14.4% 1200 50% 198 14.2% 669 80% 163 875 9~% 92 9.~ g01 89% 114 11.2% 662 N)% 85 1].4% 653 90% 69 9.6% 64 11.98% 454 32.35% 238 28.33% 145 17.77% 506 49.31% P,mcentage of Numbef PN'cent Calls Calls Calls Dele Abandoned Debyed Debyed Call 28.42% 45.00% 55.04% 41.26% 25.97% 10.57% 18.94% 192 35.96% 892 54.7'9% 272 33.83% 194 23.10% 289 547 540 395 351 234 135 3N 93% 20 7.0% 75 16,609 89% 2,071 11.1% ;ILK.) W. hm N 73 ~% ~ M% 71 73% M ~% ~"' ~% ~ ~ 171 7a 75% ~ 82% $ ef~' 132 :~0 ~% 228 ~ ~% 17e 52 ~% 1 n 82% M211 73% CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, City Manager Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION OPPOSING HR 1843 WHICH MAY REQUIRE ALL MOBILE HOME PARK DESIGNATIONS TO BE CHANGED FROM ADULT AND/OR SENIOR ONLY TO ALL FAMILY DESIGNATIONS RECOMMENDATION The City Council continue this item to the October 19, 1994 meeting. Background The City Council's Mobile Home Subcommittee has been advised that the status of the bill (HR 1843) is still pending and it is recommended this item be continued to the October 19, 1994 City Council meeting. Respectfully S bmitted, Management Analyst II DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY RECOMMENDATION The City Council adopt the attached Resolution in support of the concept of habitat conservation. BACKGROUND This item was continued from September 21, 1994, City Council meeting to allow additional review of information pertaining to Habitat Conservation Plans (HCP). That information was distributed to the Council under separate cover. (Memorandum dated September 29, 1994). Resp ctfully mitted, Ri omez' ' Director CG. :dk Attachments: Exhibit "A" - City Council Staff Report (dated September 21, 1994) Resolution in support of the HCP DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 21, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ~ Charles J. Buquet II, Mayor Pro Tem CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THEHABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR WILDLIFEAND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY RECOMMENDATION: The City Council adopts the attached Resolution in support of the concept of habitat conservation. BACKGROUND: As a follow-up to the August 3rd SANBAG Board meeting, a meeting was conducted by County Supervisor Jerry Eaves on August 31, 1994, to determine the interest level of public agencies in creating/joining a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP). The plan would ultimately identify sensitive habitat areas, identify methods of preserving habitat, and in turn, endangered or threatened species; and identify funding sources for the acquisition of sensitive habitat. The purpose of the meeting was to determine if there was support among the local agencies and public utilities for the creation of an HCP. Without local agency commitments, Supervisor Eaves believes there is no point in moving forward with the plan. Supervisor Eaves has requested a response from local agencies on the HCP by October 1, 1994. The attached draft Resolution (see Exhibit "B") has been provided by Supervisor Eaves for review and, hopefully, adoption by cities in the San Bernardino Valley. ANALYSIS: The theory behind the formation of the HCP is that habitat areas would be set aside as mitigation for present and/or future development within sensitive habitat areas. This process would eliminate the need to provide mitigation on a project-by-project basis but, rather, would provide mitigation for the entire area included within the HCP. In reviewing the proposal by Supervisor Eaves, there are several factors that should be considered by the Council. These factors include the following: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN September 21, 1994 Page #2 Initially, staff time and resources will be required to gather and disseminate information. The draft Resolution provided by Supervisor Eaves does contain language about monetary Participation with an amount "to be determined,,. It should be made clear to the Supervisor that the City is not authorizing any expenditure of funds at this time and that any request for monetary Participation must be authorized by the City Council in the future. The majority of "sensitive habitat', is outside the city limits of the City. Supervisor Eaves stated that, while no funding formula has been devised, the monetary impact to cities should be based on the extent of sensitive habitat within the community. This would imply that Rancho Cucamonga,s contribution would be minimal because of the small area of sensitive habitat that could be developed within the City. Over the past 2 years, numerous conversations have occurred about conservation plans (specially the Natural Conservation Communities Plan). In these conversations, the City has stated that project mitigation for development of sensitive habitat could be handled effectively through the Development Review process and that joining a conservation plan was not necessary. The estimated cost of HCP preparation is estimated to be between $1.8 and $2.2 million. All funding sources including State and Federal sources will be explored to fund the plan, thereby minimizing the financial impact to local jurisdictions. This estimate does not include implementation of the plan, which, in all likelihood, will be extremely expensive. Currently, federal funds are being used to assist in the creation and implementation of Natural Conservation Communities Plans. It may be possible to obtain some funds for the HCP. It is not likely that funds will be available to cover the entire cost of the HCP formulation. Formation of a Joint Powers Authority or other administrative structure will be necessary to implement the plan. It is believed the extend of financial involvement would be defined at that time. CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN September 21, 1994 Page #3 Respectively submitted, Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tem Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Letter from Supervisor Eaves Exhibit "B" - Draft Resolution submitted by Supervisor Eaves Exhibit "C" - Press release from Department of the Interior Exhibit "D" - Sensitive biological areas map Resolution in support of the HCP cc: Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner C auntl/af i lernarbtna JERRY' EA~'ES S~JPEf~SOm"I ~,~T~ DtST~IC' September 7.1994 Dennis L. Stout, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Re: Resolution of Support for the Valley-Wide Habitat Conservation Plan Dear~ As you may recall, following the August 3 SANBAG meeting, I presented a program intended to resolve the conflicts between endangered species and development within the San Bernardino Valley. The concept of a Valley-wide, Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) was presented and received favorable review as a sound approach to resolve these problems. The preparation of an HCP is envisioned as a broad based coalition of cities, the county, major utilities, water districts, environmental groups. private landowners and developers. At the conclusion of the meeting, it was suggested that a steering committee be formed to discuss in more detail the initial actions required to proceed with such a plan. The first meeting of the steering committee was held on August 31, 1994. It was the consensus of those in attendance that this project will not go forward without the support of all the cities within the valley. The committee agreed that a resolution from the cities expressing their support would demonstrate the necessary commitment to move forward with this project. A model resolution was presented to the commit'tee for discussion, and the committee suggested some minor changes. A copy of the revised model resolution is enclosed. The committee requests that each city in the valley adopt this model resolution. or one very similar to it. demonstrating the city's support for this conservation effort. We ask that this be done by October 1. 1994, so that we might proceed with the plan in earnest. ,~ E P 1 ~ 199', OF RANCHO CUCAMONc Sar'BernaramoCc, un~¥'.So~er~n,.en~Center · 33':, %ar:n Arra~,:'e~c.,:,.~.'.. · S~r'5~' .:,'..; ~ :.:'3:':'-::": ' 333 // Dennis L. Stout September 7, 1994 Page 2 I would appreciate your assistance in expediting your city's adoption of this Resolution of Support so that we will be able to move forward with this plan that is so essential to the economic well-being of our valley. Please send a copy of the adopted resolution to Randy Scott of the San Bernardino County Planning Department at 385 N. Arrowhead Ave., Third Floor, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0182. If you have any questions concerning this request, please call Randy or Jim Squire at (909) 387-4099. Sincerely, Supervisor, Fifth District JE:JS CC: Jack Lam, City Manager Scott Murphy, Associate Planner Tom Laurin, Director, County ECD Enclosure DRAFT Model Resolution # A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA. FOR THE PURPOSE OF PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING A PROGRAM TO CONSERVE WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY. WHEREAS, grave concern is mounting throughout the communities in the valley area of San Bernardino County as the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) continues the process of evaluating various candidate animal and plant species that are found in the area to determine if they should be listed as being either endangered or threatened pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA); and WHEREAS, the County, in cooperation with local jurisdictions, public agencies and private enterprises, proposes to prepare a valley-wide multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) in order to resolve the inherent conflicts between land development and rare, threatened and endangered species preservation; and WHEREAS, a proactive approach to this important issue is essential to ensure the economic well-being of all interests, both public and private, within the San Bernardino Valley; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive HCP will vastly improve the position of all the jurisdictions to provide for the development needed to create the employment opportunities that are so essential to the economic vitality of the valley area and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City will support the preparation of an HCP for the San Bernardino Valley encompassing the area generally bounded by the county lines between San Bernardino County and Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside Counties on the west and south and the San Bernardino National Forest Boundary on the north and east. and agrees to participate in a Joint Powers Authority (JPA) or other administrative structure, as deemed appropriate, to implement the plan. Section 2. The City will support this effort both by dedicating city staff time to supply the necessary data required for preparation of an HCP and monetarily, in an amount that is mutually agreed to in a fair and equitable manner between all of the local jurisdictions participating in the HCP preparation '/ 76 DRAFT I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of at a meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1994, by the following vote, to wit: Council Members: NAYS ABSFNT ABSTAIN The forgoing resolution is hereby approved this 1994. City Clerk day of Mayor of the City of Approved as to form and legal content: City Attorney OFFIC~ OP TXE EECRETAAy Augusu !~, 1994 DOS: Bob Walker =02/~08-6416 Georgia ~arham 202/208-41al DOC: Lauri Arguelles 202/482-6090 ADMZNISTXATIO~,S NEW A~SUP. A~CR POLICY TXLL8 T-Aa~3OWI4~aS: 'NO SUEPaZSBSa IN X~DA~GZRa~ SPBCZ;S PLANNING The Clln=on A~miniscr&Uion =oday announced conservation wi:~ land use evelo enc. Landowners who have endangered slpecies ha33i=ac on proper=F and agree no a Hahl=a~ Conservaclon Plan (HCP) ~der En~ngered Species ACe will non be s~ec= co 1seer de~nd Deal is a Dee1- "we're :.1ling landowners =haca deal is a ~eal,. Babbitt said. 'This ~No $urorises. polic~ says if, in the course of aevelopmen: or land'use, you invee~ money and land inno saving s~ecies, we wcn'~ come back nan years from now and say you .~ve co ~a~ more or give more.. "-'he keV issue for non-federal landowners is cercainCy,. said Bahbin:. 'They wa/zn co kz~3w ~ha~ ~Z ~hey ma~e a gOc~ faith effcr: =o ~lan a~.ea~ for species conserrs=ion, amd do so in cooperazio~ wi=h =he releva~= agencies, then ~heir plan won'u r~-P~ed ou: from under =hem many years down =he road.. "we'll work wi:h sCa~e, munic~pal a~ private landowners sen :he rules,: said Barbion. nThis assurance ~olicy makes clear :hau we won'= cha~ge =hose rules in :he middle g~me.· (m~re) ''/ in every case, where useC, uhey ~LI businesses :hac need co address lon~-ce.--m platting and same time ~rov".de u~e flex~Di~v needed needs o~ ' ' ' various specles," sa~ NOAA's Undersecrezary ~cr Cceans and Azmcsphere az CcnuLerce, Dr. james ]aker, who :he press ccnderence :oday wi:h ~a~bi~. 'n: N~AA's Nac~cnal Ma:~ne F!sherles Service (~FS) "~ '~e - er: D Par=men~'s Fish and W!~dliZe Service'are ; . ,r · .~ .- Y also empc~ered co approve MOPs. "The assurances of-'ereC by ohio new ~o~'cy sh~u~ su'mu~a ~r a~er use ~f habi:az censervanish ;lann!n~':o recc~ "Successful habicau conse---va:ion plans are win-win si~ua:ions -- economic acuivi:y conulnues and our hard:age is prouecced for fu:ure genera:ions :o en~oy.. said. The Nature C~nservancy. -~ jok~n Sawhill "This new ini=lautve maV resolve ~he business comm~'n~-y,s most inuracua~le concerns abouc :he Endangered S ec~es ~", jim whalen, a spokesparson for uhe Alliance 'or PPLabZ:a :, said ConservatiOn, a group of ma~o: landowners ho~h~ mo-e::~ ~0,000 acres !n San Diego Coun=y, - g - --an "Pr!va:a f~res: !andowners ~eed s:abil~:y and cer~ain:y ~ake :he long fetes=lands,. said C~Ar!ey Bingh~, We ~euser Co~ny's Execuclve Vice ~residenn. "we come=d =he Secretaries for advancing ideas ;ha: will help provide scablilly. for fores~ -~- lan~wne=s who ~eve~p and im~lemen~ "'~yerhaeuser is currenuly developing an HCP for spo=:ed owls ~n regon and ~ioneering a mu!ci-species NCP in-Washing:on. 'Since uhe ~ncep~ion of =he Nauural Ccgmnunt=!es ConservaTion an (NCCp) concept, we have been working wiuh rePresenuacives oK uhe Fish and wildlife Service Co develop assurances for landowners which are commemsura:e winh =heir comicmenzs :o hablcaz proueccion0. sald ~ichar~ Broming, Vice Prest~enu of :he ' -. ~ providing chose assurances s:age are designed =o meec both scans and federal endangered species requiremen=s, :hereby allowin~ for development in areas wherd :hre&~ened or endangered species occur. ) · Lack of cerEaln=~ has been a ma~or obsnacle no large scaie private conserva:ion.planning,~ SaidMonic& ~lo=tan, Senior Vtce ~overmmen= tn=en~s go live ~y ins uomnuLCmen=s in a~Drove~ NCCps.. r--'Aow~er Comcerns Led =o An~loms A= a June 14 press conference, =he two DeparT. men~s announced _ series of ~olictes aimed a= im~rovtng =he =ru~aa~ere~ Species Ac='s effec=iveness while enhanctn~ ins flexl~tli:y for businesses and prtvane landowners. Babb!== and Baker said cc~ay, s announcemenz was spurre~ priva=e, scans and munlutpal landowners, who have complained r. han, des~ize their w~llin~ess =o work wt~h =he federal governmenn co procecn species om nheir land, =he federal government ~d been reluccan= co assure ~hem im recurm ~hac would no= be reopens4 or chaz~e~ an amy nime. In uhe paso, landowners have feared be~ny informed ac a !seer date uhac despite nhetr.earlier good-fa e:h conserrs=ton error=s, =he demand for additional protection measures for species wcul~ hal= planned ~evelolDmenU an~ la~ use or result addi=iona! resnricCtons em~ require more priv~='e fun~ing. ~abbiu= said coday,i announcement gives lan~owners an lncenclv. e co gec !nvolve~ ln amHC~ plaanin~ error= by assurin~ =hem CAa: =he federal governmenU will snick by t~s ~eal wi:h =he HCP permtccees who abide by ~hetr c~servacton cumnicmenns in good -3- The .~ew ~clicy assures =ha= landowners ~)arcic=paci.~.q in a ~-.-. i - · '. . ' l~s:ed as en~ngered cr :hre&:ened. ~ ~seque..=_y cBns;rT.a:icn and -~ab~ta: ro:ec:io · ? red species implem, en: :he plan " - r~u~_ons =o held ~-~o~ers,par:!ci~a=ing in and ~!din b , '. i ~ " ' ~e HCP. ~ ' More HC"PI aS a aesul= . ro~=~hi: new po.l!cy will be ~o©~ for :he end&ngere~ species be g~d for :he ~rin=e lau~erm becaume :hey w~ll'bm'am~ure~' char ;hey will ~ve u~ =o co~le=e si~iftc~= develc~enn prc~ecns or :o ~age =heir 1~ wi:h cs~aincy for years Co c~e, w!chou= the pommibilicy o~ facing ad~C~o~l comes or tee:fictions for ~d~ere~ s~ecies PcDCecClon.. UPPer the ~ew poli~y, if a~l=lo~al micigaCi~m meamures are subsequently deemkineceeeary =~ prov~da for =he canninue~ exis:ence of a species in =he wild, =he ~:imary obliganion for suc~ measures sb~ll no~ teen wl:h&n HCP permi=nee who has been complying in goo~ falzh w~:h his ~r her obll~anions under an MCP. 81 "Our point is a ll--n~le one,- said 3ab~lcc. "z~ we've .-c~de a ~z!, and i~ tU's being implemented acco:dlng c~'che c:iue:ta seu ,=oh in uhac plan, we're noc going co be as~ing {or mo:e money NNFS aria the U.S. Fish a:~ W{ldliZe Service will have uho burden of demonsCrauing Uha: exuraor~inar~ circumsUances exisu, usin~ the beac scientific and commercial dace available. The agency findings mus: ~e clearly documenUed and based upcn reliable uechnical information re~ardin~ :he sue:us and habi~a~ requiremenus o~ the affected species. The Fish and WildliZe Service has completed a drafu handbook, "Policy and 8uidelines for HAb!ua: Conservation Planning and Processing o~ Xncidencal Take Permits . ,'~s new hanc~oc~ will serve as a guide ~om Service em loyeAs e~g~ged ~n uhe negouiauion o~ HCPs. The Service intends co p~;vide an opporuunicF ~or public comment on c~e dra~c handbook. The policy announced coolay will be included in UhaC dxa~C ~&nd~ooM, ar.d will ~here~cre be availa~le ~o: public comment. -DOZ- COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY Sensitive Biological Areas REGION Map hepafed On Augeft )1, IHl CoosI,I $,!e Iipfriin/Weleond _.~ Gfanlamd/lem,neal lA1S$ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PROGRAM TO CONSERVE WILDLIFE AND PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN THE SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY WHEREAS, concern is mounting throughout the communities in the valley area of San Bernardino County as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) continues the process of evaluating various candidate animal and plant species that are found in the area to determine if they should be listed as either endangered or threatened pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA); and WHEREAS, the County, in cooperation with local juris- dictions, public agencies and private enterprises, proposes to prepare a valley-wide multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) in order to resolve the inherent conflicts between land development and rare, threatened, and endangered species preservation; and WHEREAS, a proactive approach to this important issue is essential to ensure the economic well-being of all interests, both public and private, within the San Bernardino Valley; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive HCP will vastly improve the position of all jurisdictions to provide for the development needed to create the employment opportunities that are so essential to the economic vitality of the valley area and its citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City will support the preparation of an HCP for the San Bernardino Valley encompassing the area generally bounded by the county lines between San Bernardino County and Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside Counties on the west and south and the San Bernardino National Forest on the north and east, and agrees to participate in a Joint Powers Authority or other administrative structure as deemed appropriate to implement the plan. 2. The City will support this effort by dedicating City staff time to supply the necessary data required for preparation of an HCP. Any request for a monetary contribution, in an amount that is mutually agreed to in a fair and equitable manner between all of the local jurisdictions participating in the HCP, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council. RESOLUTION NO. Page #2 3. It is the intent and desire of this Council that any monetary contribution be based on the extent of sensitive habitat and the potential impact to that habitat which is located within the incorporated area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Resolution. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 5, 4994 STAFF REPORT Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner DISCUSSION OF A PROPOSED ORDINANCE TO PREVENT CONVENIENCE STORE ROBBERIES RMCO~e~ENDATION Staff recon=nends that City Council review the information generated by the Community Workshop with the Chamber of Commerce and the Planning Commission review of the draft ordinance and direct staff to either: 1. Support the draft ordinance as written. 2. Modify the draft ordinance. Initiate a voluntary education program in Chamber of Commerce, California Growers Convenience Store owners. cooperation with the Association and the B&CI~I~OUND On July 5, 1994, the City Council requested that within 90 days, City Staff work with the Chamber of Commerce and the Planning Comission on developing an ordinance patterned on the Gainsville, Florida Ordinance. In accordance with the Council's request, a Community Workshop was held on August 23, 1994, and the Planning Co~nission considered the information on September 14, 1994. Detailed information concerning this item is contained in the attached copy of the Planning Con~nission staff report and draft minutes of that meeting. A summary of the comments and recommendations are contained in the following analysis section. AMALYSI S Both the PLanning Commission and workshop participants were concerned with a mandatory ordinance generally for two major reasons. First, there was not a current demonstrated acute need based on crime analysis information provided by the Police Department. Second, the imposition of mandatory ordinance would necessitate significant cost increases to effected businesses, e.g., $25,000 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CONVENIENCE STORE DRAFT PROPOSED ORDINANCE October 5, 1994 Page 2 per year in payroll costs for a second night shift employee, and $5,000 to 7,000 for black and white camcorder equipment. Other concerns were: who will enforce the ordinance, at what level and what cost, and what penalties would be used to gain compliance? As written, violation of any provision of the convenience store ordinance would be a misdemeanor. Enforcement of the ordinance would be as directed by the City Manager and likely be with either/or both Code Enforcement and Police. CONCLUSION: It appears from the information received so far that the City Council may wish to consider a formal policy other than an ordinance that would require the following items: Annual crime analysis report from the Police Department on the activities involving convenience stores as compared to other businesses in the City. Encourage the Chamber of Co~nerce and California Grocers Association to work closely with the Police Department and other City staff in a voluntary robbery prevention and coLunity outreach project. The Planning Department will keep the draft Convenience Store Ordinance on file and if at any time conditions warrant reconsideration the item will be placed on the first available agenda. BB:LJH:sp Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Draft Planning Commission Minutes of September 14, 1994 Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Staff Report of September 14, 1994 Exhibit "C" - Police Department Inter Office Memo of August 19, 1994 Exhibit "D" - Police Department Robbery Analysis dated August 22, 1994 (all robberies since January 1, 1994) Draft Ordinance DIRECTOR'S REPORTS F. CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE REGULATIONS ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMONGA - Review of proposed ordinance. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. He stated that the definition of a convenience store would be expanded to indicate that it would not exceed 7,500 square feet. Commissioner Melcher asked for elaboration on the Police Department statistics. Mr. Henderson responded that the Police Department provided an analysis of the number of occurrences over the last four years, and the number has dropped. Commissioner Melcher asked if statistics had been prepared to support the statement in the proposed ordinance that the number of homicides and robberies at convenience stores exceed the number of such incidents at other establishments between the hours of 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. Mr. Henderson replied that is typical nationally. Cucamonga Police Department had not supplied those indicated they did not anticipate that it would be different from other businesses in the community. He said the Rancho statistics and had that significantly Commissioner Melcher asked if there was an incident or series of incidents which prompted the City Council to request that an ordinance be prepared. Brad Buller, City Planner, said the request was in response to the Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) training which the City Council attended. He stated that during that training the Gainsville, Florida ordinance was mentioned and the Mayor requested that staff look at it further for a possible Rancho Cucamonga City ordinance. Me remarked it was felt that it would be better to be pro-active instead of being reactive. Me said it was felt that convenience stores are more subject to robberies and the City could possibly address those issues in a pro-active manner. Commissioner Melcher suggested that a voluntary program be tried to see if it works. Chairman Barker noted that the letter from the California Grocers Association (CGA) advocates a voluntary program. Commissioner Lumpp asked if the two-person concept came from the Gainsville ordinance. Mr. Henderson replied that it did. Commissioner Lumpp asked if staff had contacted Gainsville to see how it is working. Mr. Henderson responded that the City had not contacted Gainsville, but the Planning Commission Minutes -I1- September 14, 1994 C RAFT D PUR. O-?,',ES "" Chamber of Commerce indicated they had contacted Gainsville. Mr. Buller said that they were informed there was a reduction in crime but also in the number of convenience stores, particularly the Mom-and-pop stores. He said many of the smaller stores moved out of the area. Commissioner Lumpp asked if the ordinance would become effective immediately upon adoption. Mr. Bullet replied that the ordinance is simply a draft ordinance as the City Council had asked that staff prepare a draft ordinance based on the Gainsville ordinance with community input. He said, as drafted, the effective date would be immediately; however, it could be modified so that existing businesses could be grandfathered with compliance to be achieved within a period of time--i.e., one year, two years, five years. He also said the City Attorney had suggested we f~rther clarlfy the definition of a convenience store and perhaps square footage should be considered. He said staff then researched it and found that 7,500 square feet would include most convenience stores but not grocery stores or large markets. Ralph Manson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that the ordinance as presently drafted is not a zoning ordinance and would be a presently effective business regulation unless revised. Chairman Barker invited public comment. Gary Christian, president of Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce, 8280 Utica Avenue, Suite 160, Rancho Cucamonga, noted that in their conversations with Gainsville they were informed that although crime went down in convenience stores, residential burglaries increased and he felt the issue of shifting of crime should be considered. Me agreed the proposed ordinance includes some good ideas and businesses should be encouraged to implement them, as they are by Southland Corporation and the CGA. He observed that the CGA letter cited three studies indicating that one clerk vs. two clerks is not statistically significant in reducing crime and that crime in convenience stores is being reduced nationally. He noted that Money Magazine had recently stated that Rancho Cucamonga is the llth safest City with populations over 100,000 in the United States. He said business people already take steps to protect themselves and their employees and customers. He also felt it would be difficult to enforce such an ordinance. He said the Police Department had remarked that it goes out and discusses crime prevention measures whenever requested to do so by the business owner. He thought it would not be reasonable to have the Police Department checking to make sure that businesses have two employees and not more than $50 in the register. He offered the services of the Chamber of Commerce to do whatever they can to help the convenience stores but he felt there is not a problem. Me provided a copy of Police Department summary of convenience store statistics, which indicated that larceny and violent crimes at convenience stores had generally decreased over the last four years. He noted that a few stores still could use some help. Commissioner Lumpp asked if the Chamber of Commerce was recommending that an Planning Commission Minutes -12- September 14, 1994 FO,~ DiSCUSS!ON FURPCSES ONLY ordinance not be adopted. Mr. Christian replied that an ordinance encouraging steps may be acceptable but he indicated likely opposition to an ordinance mandating steps. Commissioner Melcher noted that some of the requirements in the ordinance deal with CPTED issues, primarily visibility into the store, of the cashier, and customer, etc. He asked if the Chamber objected to those issues, or only requiring more employees and security cameras. Mr. Christian replied that was correct. He noted that the Sign Ordinance deals with the issue of signs blocking visibility into the store but he noted it does not cover the issue of stacked boxes blocking that visibility. He felt that boxes should not block visibility from the standpoint of good business sense. He agreed it does help to have good visibility into the store. Commissioner Melcher thought that such provisions would not significantly impact business and do make sense. He felt some of the other provisions do not seem appropriate for the community. Mr. Christian asked if the next step would be to require that every automobile in the City have a club and all residences have a guard dog. He said he understood that the government wants to protect its citizens, but he thought there is currently not a problem and the measures go too far. He thought the Police Department should be commended for the job they do. Commissioner Lumpp felt that Rancho Cucamonga is a safe City because the City Council and the Planning Commission have not developed programs in a reactionary mode, but rather in a positive, pro-active sense. He thought this ordinance was an attempt to be pro-active. He supported the idea but did not think all of the provisions apply. He thought that adding an additional clerk would not stop a robbery. He questioned if convenience stores could not have a panic button which connects to the Police Department in lieu of two people or a security camera. Mr. Christian said that may lead to false alarms. Art Perez, Loss Prevention Manager for Southland Corporation, 120 South State College Boulevard, Brea, indicated he has approximately 22 years experience in law enforcement and retail. He provided a copy of materials they use in the Robbery/Violence Prevention training. Me offered his services to assist in helping draft an ordinance. He said the latest FBI report has shown a double- digit drop in robberies in the convenience industry while fast food businesses and banks are showing an increase. He stated that Southland utilizes two clerks where it is economically feasible and they are trying to install a camera system in each of their 1,200 stores as time goes by. He observed their camera system utilizes a color monitor on which patrons can see themselves. He reported when they installed such equipment, crime took a 70 percent drop, but he noted it is a very expensive system. He said they also have a hold up button which is tied to a security company which dispatches the Police. Because 7-11 stores are already slated to get such equipment, he felt Planning Commission Minutes -13- ~" L .: .C..:--.t "' ' ....... ONLY ,-...,:~.....,S<-.:.'j'~:Cl"4 ?'ij'.RPCSES September 14, 1994 the ordinance would probably not cause a severe impact on those stores; however, he felt it could be too large of a burden on the small independent stores. He said there are other things which can be done such as training and providing clear visibility into the store with reduced signage and low aisles. He said he is currently working with several police departments to help them establish programs. He said they also offer their services to other companies. Commissioner Lumpp asked how they feel about the panic button. Mr. Perez replied they are comfortable with the buttons but they educate their people not to push the button until after the robbery has occurred. He said they try to prevent robberies but if one occurs, they want the person out as soon as possible. Chairman Barker observed that there are no or minimal costs associated with some of the ideas while others are cost items--such as two persons, drop or time-release safes, and security cameras. He felt that it is illogical for a store to block visibility with window signs or stacks or boxes. Commissioner Melcher noted such cluttering signs are more commonly found on small independent stores. Chairman Barker commented that 7-11 already has a major crime prevention program. He said small independent stores do not have such a program and may put themselves at risk by trying to cram in extra advertising or extra storage space. He thought that is not a cost item but he questioned how far the City wants to go in regulating them. He was not comfortable with mandating a policy that only $50 be available at one time because of enforcement problems. He felt the City should try to help prevent occurrences rather than being reactive. Commissioner Lumpp felt that additional lighting could potentially be a cost item as well. Chairman Barker noted there are current regulations regarding lighting. asked if that provision would mean additional costs for businesses. He Mr. Buller replied that it might entail additional costs for those locations which were developed under the County standards prior to City incorporation. He thought the Planning Commission may wish to recommend that the more costly items be phased in. Me said the ordinance could perhaps cover those items which are no or low cost and the City could conduct workshops and assist in training in crime prevention. He noted that Southland Corporation has offered their assistance and the Police Department has offered to meet with the businesses independently to go over crime prevention ideas. Commissioner Lumpp asked if the Police Department supports the proposed ordinance. Mr. Bullet replied that the Police Department was at the workshop to assist and provided some of the data. He said they are supportive of any City Planning Commission Minutes -14- September 14, 1994 FOR D'~'~' 91 Council direction to reduce crime but they have not taken a position of recommending for or against any of the specific elements of this ordinance. Chairman Barker felt lighting should be improved to current standards, even if there are costs involved, as he thought ~hat is a cost of doing business. He thought lighting by itself is a deterrent and lighting should be improved immediately where necessary. He felt security cameras are becoming increasingly reasonable and perhaps they should be strongly recommended rather than a requirement. He thought some of the items could be strongly recommended while others could be phased in. He felt it makes good business sense for small independent stores to not have more than $50 cash available but he questioned if the City could legally mandate that no more than $50 be available. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, suggested it could be a business license regulation, but enforcement would be unfeasible. Mr. Buller observed that comments were made at the workshop that it would take an enormous amount of staff time and resources to enforce every aspect of the ordinance. He said some community representatives asked who would pay associated costs and the City Council should address that issue. Commissioner Melcher stated he would like to see requirements for two people and the security camera changed to recommendations. Chairman Barker felt the City could make a suggestion that no more than $50 in cash be available and that a sign to that effect be posted, but he felt it would be too difficult to enforce. He questioned if the City can require a drop-safe or time-release safe. Commissioner Melcher felt that lighting should be upgraded where needed immediately. He noted that the proposed ordinance requires employee training in a course given by the Police Department or certified by the City and he asked if any courses have been certified. Mr. Bullet replied none are presently certified but staff felt that courses such as Southland's training would probably be acceptable. Commissioner Melcher felt uncomfortable with requiring people to take a City program and then charging for the program. He wanted to be sure there is an alternative available. He did not want to give the appearance of the City setting up a monopoly. Mr. Buller said staff's intent was that employees working during evening hours receive some training. Me was aware that Southland Corporation offers courses and said staff could work on how to certify such courses. Chairman Barker agreed the City should not be the only provider. Commissioner Lumpp recommended that the requirements for two people, a security camera, drop-safe or time-release safe, limitation to $50 cash, and training be eliminated. Planning Commission Minutes -15- September 14, 1994 F',?_,:~ "' "' "' :...,.:,-E~'C',.j'..jL'...~'j ,.- .j:-~.u'ZT'-'S C;~'.!L ,.' Chairman Barker asked if the requirement to post a sign in the window stating that no more than $50 cash is available to employees should be removed because it may be requiring store owners to lie. Commissioner Lumpp felt that some of the ideas are good but would be too tough to enforce. Chairman Barker suggested that those items be recommendations but not requirements. Planning Commission Minutes -16- September 14, 1994 F"c.~ Discu.?~;c:,: Pu~Pcs,"c..q O,",~LY ...... T' DATE: TO: FROM: BY: S UBJE CT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 14, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Larry J. Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE REGULATIONS ORDINANCE - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Review of proposed ordinance. STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND: This report is an update on the progress and schedule for the Council-requested Convenience Food Store Ordinance based on Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts. Staff is seeking the Planning Cornmiss ion ' s input on the draft Ordinance and the points raised at the August 23, 1994, City/Chamber workshop which are highlighted below. At the City Council meeting on July 6, 1994, the City Council requested that within 90 days, City staff work with the Chamber of Co~m~erce and the Planning Commission on developing an ordinance based upon CPTED principals and patterned after the Gainsville, Florida Ordinance. A copy of the schedule, summary of the ordinance provisions, and the draft ordinance are provided for reference. A City/Chamber of Commerce Community Workshop to discuss the draft ordinance was held on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, at 3:30 p.m. in the Tri-Communities Room of the Civic Center. All the affected stores and their owners were notified, as well as the California Grocers Association (CGA). The highlights were as follows: Approximately 4 of the 23 convenience store owners attended along with representatives from Southland Corporation and the CGA and three board members from the Chamber of Co~nerce. A majority of the attendees indicated that they felt a mandatory program would place unfunded mandates on the owners and lead to some businesses failing. Costs quoted included $25,000 per year in payroll costs to require a second employee after 8 p.m. and $5,000 to $7,000 for black and white camcorder equipment. Concerns were also raised with who would handle enforcement; what level of enforcement would be taken; and what, if any, penalties there would be. Some concerns were expressed over the costs for the enforcement program. 4. Some pointed out that Police Department figures currently indicate that there is no acute problem with convenience stores at this time. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FOOD CONV. STORE ORDINANCE - CITY OF R.C. September 14, 1994 Page 2 The CGA recommended a voluntary outreach and education program be considered instead of an ordinance. A copy of the CGA correspondence is attached for reference. The Chamber of Co~=nerce indicated their willingness to assist in a voluntary outreach and education program. Staff indicated that the Planning Commission would review the Ordinance in at their meeting on September 14, 1994. It was also noted that staff has tentatively set October 5, 1994, for City Council to hear the matter. Staff requests that the Planning Commission receive testimony from all interested persons, discuss the issues relative to the proposed ordinance, and forward any comments or recommendations to the City Council. City Planner BB:LJH/jfS Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Schedule Exhibit "B" - Letter and Attachments dated August 22, 1994 from the California Grocers Association Exhibit "C" - Revised Draft Ordinance CPTED CONVIEN~E STORE ORDINANCE SCHEDULE 7/3- 7/10- 7/17- 7/24- 7/31- 8/7- 8/14- 8/21- 8/28- 9/4- 7/9 7/16 7/23 7/30 8/6 8/13 8/20 8/27 9/3 9/10 7/6 CC REQUE- ST (90 DAYS) 818 FOLLOW UP INTER. DEPT. MTG. 7/z9 7/25 8/3 8/Zo 8/4 MTG. PRELIM FINAL DRAFT STAFF NOTI- STAFF SCNED. ORDIN. MTG. FIC. MTG.RE APPROV DISTR- W/ SENT SCHED. & BUTE CNAM- TO & ROUTED TO BER DEPT.S CON- CHAM- TENT BER elI5 PC AGENDA SET 8/23 COMMU- NITY WORK- SHOP 9/11- 9/ 9/17 9 ~/14 PC MTG 9/15 CC MTG NOTIF. DEADLINE 18- 9/25- 10/2- /24 10/1 10/8 10/5 CC MTG 1ST RD SCHEDULE NOTES: Schedule reflects optimum number of days. As can be seen the PC mtg. is set before t.l~,. Community workshop is even held. Likewise the PC Mtg. is at the same time as the CC advertising deadline. This schedule is very optimistic and may need to change. It assumes we will present an Ordinance for both Commission and Council action on 9/14 and 10/5. If this schedule can not be met, will, at a minimum, tentatively schedule a City Council stausd report for the October 5th meeting. -_ _ City of Rancho Cucamonga CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES SECURITY MEASURES (CFSSMO) PURPOSE: ORDINANCE TO MINMIZE OR ELIMINATE A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF POTENTIAL INCIDENTS OF HOMICIDE AND/OR ROBBERY AT CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES. SU,~rMARY OF ORDINANCE RF. GUI .ATIONS: 1. TWO EMPLOYEES BETWEEN 8 PM AND 4 AM. 2. WINlX)WS ARE TO BE LF-FF CLEAR AND UNOBSTRUCTED, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A VIEW OF THE CASH REGISTER AND SALES AREA FROM THE STREET AND/OR PUBLIC PARKING AREA. 3. SALES AREA TO BE LOCATED SO THAT THE CLERK AND CUSTOMER ARE FULLY VISIBLE FORM THE STREET AND/OR PUBLIC PARKING AREA AT THE TIME OF SALES TRANSACTION. 4. POST A CONSPICIOUS SIGN WHICH STATES $50.00 OR LESS IN REGISTER. 5. NO MORE THAN $50.00 CASH READILY AVAILABLE TO EMPLOYEES. 6. MAINTAIN A DROP-SAFE OR TIME RELEASE SAFE BOLTED OR INSTALLED IN THE FLOOR, OR WEIGHING AT I-F-AST 500 POUNDS. 7. CUSTOMER PARKING AREA MUST BE ILLUMINATED DURING ALL HOURS OF DARKNK~. 8. PROVIDE SECURITY CAMCORDER AT At I. TIMES. 9. OWNER OR EMPLOYEES WORKING BETWEEN 7 PM AND 5 AM SHAI .I, COMPI-FIE A COURSE IN ROBBERY PREVENTION THROUGH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT, California Grocers Association 5;:I,'dNC iN'F. FG(.~r~ :N~t,-?r'RY r~d: C-~.L:F~Y~NI .~ SFx'C~ !.5 'I.,~ August 22. 1994 Mr. Dave Barker President, Planning Commission City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 VIA FAX Dear Commissioner Barker: This letter is in response to the proposed ordinance which would create Chapter 9.28 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code regulating convenience stores. The California Grocers Association/California Association of Neighborhood Stores. which represents more than 8,000 members including supermarket chain stores. mid-size independent grocers and small neighborhood stores. shares many of your concerns regarding convenience stores and the potential for theft and robbery.. In fact. we have always taken a pro-active -',tance on t.his issues and have instituted voluntary programs such as our Neighborhood Outreach Program to foster communication and cooperation between retail grocers. local government, law enforcement and the community. As you will note on the enclosed booklet. many of the suggestions encompassed in the proposed ordinance are addressed by tl~is program. In fact, we offer many more operational standards as well as much needed guidelines for alcohol and tobacco sales. crime awareness, and commutUr,. involvement. We also provide an 800 number which serves as a clearinghousi: for both the stores and the community to help solve concerns before they become major problems. We hope that the City would chose to pan|cipate tn this program. Regarding the operational guidetines outlined in the proposed ordinance. we cannot support a requirement that stores hire additional staff nor can we support the mandatory installation of security. systems. Such requirements unduly penalize the neighborhood store by increasing the cost of doing business and therefore jeopardizing their ability to compete with other stores. Additional personnel and expensive security sy'stem.s will not deter a criminal from an already sensetess act. The installation of video cameras would t'equire stores to purchase video cameras tt'ith an estimatect cost of S10.000 each. AdditIonal cc. srs would include installation. maintenance, monthly ser,'ice fees and use training. Oepending upon the size. some stores coulh require multiple caa~eras. All this. when there is no evidence to shov,' t~at video cameras are effective in deterSrig criminal behavior much less helo with crirrunal apprehension. While there is ottlv !imited data on apprehension. figures from the Los Angeles Police Department show that less th.'u:z half of the suspects captured in L..A. bank robberies last year were apprehended through the use of surveillance cameras. In fact. aespite the mandated use of cameras in banks. 264 suspec!s were never caught. Furthermo~'e. three studies commassioned by the National Association of Convenience Stores found that 1) over 80% of all U.S. convenience stores are ro0ben., flee and 2) that one clerk vs. two clerks was not statistically significant on robbery rate reduction. And. irtformation released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in late 1993 reported that con~'enience stores had outpaced all other categories recorded in reducing the incidence of robbery (see attachment). We hope that you will share our thoughts with the Plartrti. ng Commission. Please don't hesitate to call me at 310/432-8610 if you have further questions or concerns. We stand ready to work with the city of Rancho Cucamonga to find a fair and reasonable approach to this difficult problem. Sincerely, CALIFORNIA GROCERS ASSOCIATION BETH BEEMAN Director of City/County Governmental Relations Enclosures CO: City Council City Planner NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PROGRAM OPERATIONAL POLICY As a member of the CaJdforrda Association of Neighborho<xl S~z~s (CANS) and participant in the Neighborhood Out~ach Program, the undersigned agrees to stricdy adhere and take all reasonable acdon necessary m ensttre compliance with these standm'ds. 1. T'ne Neighborhood Outreach Program member du:al must be placed on the front door in dL,'r, ct view of customers entering the store. 2. Every reasonable means must be used to eliminate where necessary loitering on store prope, ny incluciin g parking lots to work with local law enforcement;, including posting "No Loitering" signs. 3. Best efforts must be used to k~p all store property, parking lots and any adjacent property clean and free of customers' liner. Paricing lot must have adequate lighting according to building code standards and lights must replaced as needed. Train employees to pass Neighborhood Outreach Progrim pwvidr,,d or equivalent company provided test so they fully uDderstand and can enforce state laws and regulations regarding the sale of alcohol and tobacco. Store must udlize the in-store decals provided by Neighborhood Outreach Program (or equivalent company provided decals) r~gatding alcohol and tobacco sales to minors. Employees will be trained in crime awareness techniques and provided with the materials necessary for crime awareness. Strictly prohibit the use or sale of~legal substances on store property including parking lots. To discourage saJes or narcotics on store property and will be rt'ported to authorities. All outsid~ pay telephones should be switched by telephone company to aCCOrnmOda~_, outgoing calls only. Not more than on ~ird (1/3) of front windows can be covered with signage, Windows near the sal~s counter and entrance doors must retrain clear of s~gnage. For security purposes, a clear view of the store should be visible from the street and pailring lot. In order to improve community relations and the appearance of your store, beer and tobacco product signs should not be over used, so ~at your customers and the community do not have the irs~,ression that you are only interested in selIing beer and tobaccoFroducts, No neon signs advertisingproducts can be placed in windows or doors. 9. Display all Federal, State, County and City signs that are required by law. They are listui in the Program Signage Section of this r~_nual. 100 I0. 11. All banners hung outside the score should recommendations ~re as follows: Louery Banners - cha,n~e a~ necessaxy Gr'a. nd OpenLn~s - change wirJ~L~ 30 d~ys New M~agement - change within 30 days Monthly Sl:~,.cials. change every 30 days Pennants - change eve~ ~0 day~ be rotated or ch~ged and clea~ed and the Mainfaln a close working relationship with local law enforcement agencies and local comrnuni ty orgar~izadons. FOR MORE IN ORxMATION, CAI,L 1-800-794-3545 101 DEP.s, R1'~4E."rr OF POLICI CITY OF 5ACR~IENTO C-U. JFO&NfA Apn] 8, I991 Ret~ 4-20 I'~LL 0" JL'ST:C[ 113 ~IXTH STREET ~.aC.'I,A.stENTO. CA Chuck Beaver, D{recmr Ca/ifarrfia Grcc~n A.~cc~a~on 906 G Street, Suite 700 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear .Mr. Beaver, We have reviewed the maxerials associate c[ wi~ tJ:c United Neighborhood Outreach Program which ~ being sponsored by the California Al,,oc~xicn of Neighborhood Store~ I am very p/cased r~ see the A~ocmdon ~tmg such a posit~ program aimed at reducing beth :he real and the perc:ivcd problems associated w/th convenienc~ stores. Implement/ng steps such as those o~[incct in the proram w/l] not only improve the qLLaHry af life in neighborhoods served by your pen'icipacing membcrs, but also re:duce the real danger of crime ~a~ meir employees face on a daily The Sacr-,,~ento Police Department ~s Fle::.~d :c support this pra~zn. and I w~]l have a r~presenmr/ve present at your ,May Ist kick-off. If we may be of any further ass~stlnc~ your crime prevention efforts, please contact our Commumt7 Rcsourccs Section a: 449-5731, S~ncere~, Chief of Police 102 RobberT Five Year-~nalysis ( 1988 Base Year) it~qk goi~ber~ ,14' ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.28 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES. WHEREAS, the nu~er of homicides and robberies at Convenience Food Stores exceed the number of such incidents at other establishments between the hours of 8 p.m. and 4 a.m.; and WHEREAS, such excess demonstrates a greater likelihood that such incidents will occur unless precautionary measures are taken at Convenience Food Stores; and WHEREAS, the occurrence of such incidents may result in loss of life and/or property and is contrary to the public health and safety and the welfare of the employees and customers of Convenience Food Stores; and WHEREAS, these regulations provide essential requirements that will minimize or eliminate a significant number of incidents of homicide and/or robbery at Convenience Food Stores; and WHEREAS, on August 23, 1994, a public workshop was conducted to obtain public input; and WHEREAS, on , 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed pubic hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance has occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Chapter 9.28, to read, in words and figures, as follows: Chapter 9.28 CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES. Sections: 9.28.010 Definitions. 9.28.020 Regulations. 9.28.010 Definitions. The following terms and phrases, when used in this Chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES - CITY OF R.C. 1994 Page 2 A. "Convenience Food Store" is a business establishment that: 1. Derives 50 percent or more of its gross income, excluding motor fuels, from the sale of goods, merchandise, or other articles of value in their original containers; and 2. Offers a limited quantity and variety of food, household, and sundry items; and 4 a.m.; and Operates at any time between the hours of 8 p.m. and items. 4. Does not sell or have for sale prescription drug B. "Owner" is the person, corporation, partnership, joint venture, or other group enterprise having lawful possession of the premises upon which the Convenience Food Store is operated. C. "Employee" is the person, corporation, partnership, joint venture, or group enterprise legally responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Convenience Store. 9.28.020 Regulations. All Convenience Food Stores shall comply with the following regulations: A. If open for business after 8 p.m., the Convenience Food Store must employ two persons continuously on duty on the premises from 8 p.m. until closing or 4 a.m., whichever event occurs first. B. Locate any signs posted in the windows so as to provide a clear and unobstructed view of the cash register and sales area from the street. C. Locate the sales area so that the clerk and customer are fully visible from the street at the time of the sales transaction. D. Post a conspicuous sign, not exceeding 2 square feet in area, in the window which states the cash register has $50.00 cash or less in it. E. Have no more than $50.00 cash available and readily accessible to employees. F. Maintain a drop-safe or time release safe at the Convenience Food Store which is bolted to the floor or installed in the floor or weighs at least 500 pounds. G. Post a conspicuous sign, not exceeding 2 square feet in area, in the window which states that there is a safe at the store and it is not accessible to the employees. 105 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES - CITY OF R.C. 1994 Page 3 H. The entire area of the parking lot area utilized by customers of the Convenience Food Store must be lighted during all hours of darkness when the employees and/or customers ~re on the premises as follows: 1. Minimum average maintained illuminance must be two foot candles or greater wXth a uniformity ratio (average to minimum) of no more than 5:1. 2. Additionally, all such lighting shall be in accordance with the applicable City's Lighting Code requirements, and shall be verified through the submittal of a detailed lighting plan to the Planning Commission and the Crime Prevention Bureau of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. I. Install a security camera of a type and number approved by the City Manager or his designee. Said camera must be capable of producing a retrievable image on film or tape that can be made a permanent record and that can be enlarged through projection or other means. Cameras meeting the requirements of this section shall be maintained in proper working order at all times and shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City Manager or his designee. J. Any owner or employee who works between the hours of 7 p.m. and 5 a.m. at a Convenience Food Store shall complete a course in Robbery Prevention to be given by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, or a program certified by the City Manager or his designee, within 30 days after he or she begins employment. If the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department's Robbery Prevention course is utilized, the City Manager or his designee shall determine the cost of training per employee to the City and the Convenience Food Store shall pay the cost to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department prior to the training of the employee. SECTION 2: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or other portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk Shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 106 .ate: From: 'To; INTEROFFICE MEMO August 19, 1994 Dave Baker, Lieutenant Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Subject: Convenience Stores - Statistics Attached is a list that shows the number of reports that have been drawn for Larceny and Violent type crimes at the locations that you requestehd. The report is a summary report that is broken down by location and totals for each year at that location. The detail data is available at your r~quest. DW/dw 107 Summary report of Larceny and Violent crimes at designated locations by year Address Year Count 10050 WILSON AV 1994 1 I0110 FOOTHILL BL 1987 3 1988 12 1989 24 1990 19 1991 29 1992 13 10120 25TH ST 10277 FOOTHILL BL 1990 1 1990 1 1991 1 1992 1 1994 2 10451 LEMON 1989 5 1990 14 1991 15 1992 7 1993 5 1994 2 12854 FOOTHILL BL 1987 1 1988 9 1989 11 1990 13 1992 1 1994 1 12962 FOOTHILL BL 1988 2 1989 1990 1 1991 1 1993 4 1994 1 Page I 108 Summary report of Larceny and Violent crimes at designated locations by year Addre s s Year Count 6760 CARNELIAN ST 7172 ARCHIBALD AV 7270 VICTORIA PARK LA 7278 ARCHIBALD AV 7287 ARCHIBALD AV 7900 HAVEN AV 8045 VINEYARD AV 1987 6 1988 14 1989 8 1990 23 1991 25 1992 20 1993 14 1994 10 199! 2 1993 1 1991 3 1992 2 1993 4 1994 4 1990 1 1987 1 1989 5 1990 7 1991 16 1992 5 1993 12 1994 3 1987 1 1988 6 1989 8 1990 7 1991 11 1992 4 1993 13 1994 5 1992 1 1993 2 1994 1 P~ge 2 109 Summary report of Larceny and Violent crimes at designated locations by year Addre s s Yea r Coun ~ 8081 ARCHIBALD AV 8114 ARROW RTE 8161 FOOTHILL BL 8401 HAVEN AV 8694 ARROW ROUTE 884 7 ARCHIBALD AV 9032 ARCHIBALD AV 9255 BASELINE RD 1987 1 1988 4 1989 5 1990 17 1991 29 1992 19 1993 7 1994 4 1988 1 1991 2 1992 1 1993 1 1994 1 1993 2 1987 1 1988 1 1989 2 1990 3 1991 2 1993 4 1994 1 1990 1993 1991 1 1991 1 1992 2 1993 2 1994 1 Pa~e 3 110 Summary report of Larceny and Violent crimes at designated locations. by year Addre s s Yea r Cc un t 9464 BASELINE RD 1987 5 1988 14 1989 I0 1990 33 1991 32 1992 20 1993 17 1994 21 9477 FOOTHILL 1987 1 1989 2 1990 8 1991 7 1992 1 1993 6 1994 3 9677 FOOTHILL BL 1990 2 1993 1 1994 1 9755 ARROW RTE 1989 2 1990 1 1991 1 1992 2 1993 1 1994 1 9794 19TH ST 1988 2 1990 4 1991 3 1992 ! 9950 FOOTHILL BL 1988 9 1989 7 1990 16 1991 11 1992 14 1993 14 1994 7 Page 4 111 08/~22/94 Part 1 Crime Homicide Rape Robb Weap Robb Strgarm ADW Burglary Res Burglary Com Burglary Veh Grand Theft Auto Theft Assault ALL TOTAL Robbery since 01/01/94 Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Count 0 0 102 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !I1 Part 2 Crime Forgery Fraud Sex Felony Sex Misd Narcotics Alcohol Viol Drunk Disord Cond DUI Vandalism Arson Receiving Theft ALL TOTAL Count 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Weapons Concealed Felony Misd Shooting ALL TOTAL Count 0 0 0 0 0 Day of Week Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Count 16 22 18 15 112 Robbery since 01/~ ,~/'94 Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Day of Week (continued) Count Friday Saturday Sunday ALL 22 11 7 0 TOTAL 111 Day of Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 !0 ii 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 TOTAL Count 8 1 6 6 2 3 3 1 5 1 5 3 3 1 8 0 0 8 8 1 4 4 1 6 2 9 3 3 5 1 0 111 Month January February March April May June July Count 17 11 18 12 15 10 18 113 08,/22/94 Month (continued) August September October November December ALL TOTAL Robbery since 01/01/94 Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Count 10 0 0 0 0 0 !I1 Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 TOTAL Count 0 0 1il 0 0 0 0 0 111 Time Block 0000-0059 0100-0159 0200-0259 0300-0359 0400-0459 0500-0559 0600-0659 0700-0759 0800-0859 0900-0959 1000-1059 1100-1159 1200-1259 1300-1359 1400-1459 1500-1559 1600-1659 1700-1759 1800-1859 1900-1959 2000-2059 2100-2159 2200-2259 2300-2359 ALL TOTAL Count 17 4 4 7 1 3 0 2 7 4 1 5 4 3 3 4 0 2 4 4 5 12 6 9 0 111 114 ORDINANCE NO. OBAFr AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 9.28 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES. WHEREAS, the number of homicides and robberies at Convenience Food Stores exceed the number of such incidents at other establishments between the hours of 8 p.m. and 4 a.m.; and WHEREAS, such excess demonstrates a greater likelihood that such incidents will occur unless precautionary measures are taken at Convenience Food Stores; and WHEREAS, the occurrence of such incidents may result in loss of life and/or property and is contrary to the public health and safety and the welfare of the employees and customers of Convenience Food Stores; and WHEREAS, these regulations provide essential requirements that will minimize or eliminate a significant number of incidents of homicide and/or robbery at Convenience Food Stores; and WHEREAS, on August 23, 1994, a public workshop was conducted to obtain public input; and WHEREAS, on , 1994, the City Council conducted and concluded a duly noticed pubic hearing concerning the subject amendment to the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Ordinance has occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California: SECTION 1: The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby amended to add a new Chapter 9.28, to read, in words and figures, as follows: Chapter 9.28 CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES- Sections: 9.28.010 Definitions. 9.28.020 Regulations. 9.28.010 Definitions. The following term-~ and phrases, when used in this Chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this Section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 115 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES - CITY OF R.C. (Date) Page 2 A. "Convenience Food Store" is a business establishment that: 1. Derives 50 percent or more of its gross income, excluding motor fuels, from the sale of goods, merchandise, or other articles of value in their original containers; and area; and Does not exceed 7,500 square feet in gross building 3- Offers a limited quantity and variety of food, household, and sundry items; and 4 a.m.; and Operates at any time between the hours of 8 p.m. and items. 5. Does not sell or have for sale prescription drug B. "Owner" is the person, corporation, partnership, joint venture, or other group enterprise having lawful possession of the premises upon which the Convenience Food Store is operated. C. "Employee" is the person, corporation, partnership, joint venture, or group enterprise legally responsible for the day-to-day operation of the Convenience Store. 9.28-020 Regulations. All Convenience Food Stores shall comply with the following regulations: A. If open for business after 8 p.m., the Convenience Food Store must employ two persons continuously on duty on the premises from 8 p.m. until closing or 4 a-m., whichever event occurs first. B. Locate any signs posted in the windows so as to provide a clear and unobstructed view of the cash register and sales area from the street. C. Locate the sales area so that the clerk and customer are fully visible from the street at the time of the sales transaction. D. Post a conspicuous sign, not exceeding 2 square feet in area, in the window which states the cash register has $50.00 cash or less in it. E. Have no more than $50.00 cash available and readily accessible to employees. F. Maintain a drop-safe or time release safe at the Convenience Food Store which is bolted to the floor or installed in the floor or weighs at least 500 pounds. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONL 116 CiTY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. CONVENIENCE FOOD STORES - CITY OF R.C. ( Date ) Page 3 ORAFT G. Post a conspicuous sign, not exceeding 2 square feet in area, in the window which states that there is a safe at the store and it is not accessible to the employees. H. The entire area of the parking lot area utilized by customers of the Convenience Food Store must be lighted during all hours of darkness when the employees and/or customers are on the premises as follows: 1. Minimum average maintained illuminance must be two foot candles or greater with a uniformity ratio (average to minimum) of no more than 5:1. 2. Additionally, all such lighting shall be in accordance with the applicable City's Lighting Code requirements, and shall be verified through the submittal of a detailed lighting plan to the Planning Con~nission and the Crime Prevention Bureau of the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. I- Install a security camera of a type and number approved by the City Manager or his designee. Said camera must be capable of producing a retrievable image on film or tape that can be made a permanent record and that can be enlarged through projection or other means. Cameras meeting the requirements of this section shall be maintained in proper working order at all times and shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City Manager or his designee. J. Any owner or employee who works between the hours of 7 p.m. and 5 a.m. at a Convenience Food Store shall complete a course in Robbery Prevention to be given by the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department, or a program certified by the City Manager or his designee, within 30 days after he or she begins employment. If the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department's Robbery Prevention course is utilized, the City Manager or his designee shall determine the cost of training per employee to the City and the Convenience Food Store shall pay the cost to the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department prior to the training of the employee. SECTION 2: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason deemed or held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses, phrases, or other portions might subsequently be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 3: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk Shall cause the same to be published within 15 days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 117 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager~ Mayor Pro Tem Chuck Buquet BAR/LOUNGE/ENTERTAINMENT ORDINANCE DISCUSSION At the May 4, 1994 City Council meeting, during the discussion of the Babe's Club 66, a suggestion was made that the Council be involved whenever applications are submitted for the sale of alcohol or for Entertainment Permits at any business. The reason stated for the Council's involvement is that these uses are invariably controversial and they usually come before the Council anyway. After a review with staff of the details on current regulations for these activities, it is now appropriate to seek formal City Council direction on this item. It is recon~nended the City Council direct staff to prepare appropriate Code Amendments to accomplish the following: AMENDMENT 1A: Amend the City Code to require automatic City Council review and final action for all Conditional Use Permits, Entertainment Permits, and revocation hearings for bars and/or lounges, with or without restaurants. AMENDMENT 1B: In addition to Amendment 1A, prohibit bars and lounges (with or without a restaurant) - other than restaurants with beer and wine only and no entertainment - from all neighborhood commercial zones in the City. AMENDMENT 1C: In addition to Amendments 1A and 1B, prohibit bars and lounges (with or without a restaurant) - other than restaurants with beer and wine only and no entertainment - from all commercial, office/professional, and industrial zones within 1,000 feet of residentially zoned property. CB:sp Attachment: Exhibit "A" - City Council May 4, 1994 Minutes City Council Minutes May 4, 1994 Page 11 Jack Lam, City Manager, stated normally this would have been discussed at the Superintendent's meetir xt one is not scheduled until June. that Central School District, thanked the City for their con schools m'uggling also and that she would have to any financial su program. program. She stated before she could commit to Gene Newton. Etiwanda Sch David Shukman. studl as he &,,rows o would support the program. High Sch seen more drug abuse among the students pro&,,ram would be very '.r, AIm Loma High School, also felt the D.A.R.E. program would :It the program would be a great service to the community. 2)N: Report received and filed. students. I2. DISCUSSION ON BABE'S CLUB 66 Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Stout asked him to explain what a nonconforming use was which Mr. Bullet continued to do. Mayor Stout asked if this building would have to meet all current standards. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated yes and that the applicant has been informed of this. Councilmember Buquct stated he had this brought up because of some input he has received from other people. He felt anytime there is sale of alcohol at a business or an entertainment permit involved, the matter should go before the entire Council for approval. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he agreed with Councilmember Buquet's suggestion on the Counci!'s involvement with the alcohol use and entertainment. ACTION: Report received and filed. DISCUSSION ON WIlERE TO CONDUCT ROUTE 30 MEETINGS O'Neil, U,jr'.-,~' ~eer. Staff Mayor Stout asked who d, Joe O'Nei[, City Engineer, stated it would Mayor Stout felt regular Council meeting is needed. of the City Council. gs would be appropriate uet stated there are also other agencies that have to be consid, ~e to participate in the meetings. these / DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA October 5, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Charles J. Buquet, II, Mayor Pro Tem STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached Resolution opposing the Federal Implementation Plan, in its current form, and that our Federal elected officials be urged to prepare federal legislation to clarify the 1990 Clean Air Act. BACKGROUND: In 1977, the federal government approved the Clean Air Act (CAA). The CAA provided protection of air quality through the establishment of national air quality standards for various pollutants. The CAA stated that a designated agency in each region, in our case the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), prepare a plan demonstrating how compliance with the standards would be obtained by December 31, 1987. Since 1977, additional information about air quality led to several amendments to the CAA. In addition, it was found that the South Coast Air Basin (Basin) could not meet the deadline for ozone, nitrogen dioxide (NOx), Carbon Monoxide (CO), and particulates (PM 10). As a result, Congress adopted substantial amendments to the CAA. New deadlines were established for meeting air quality standards based on the severity of the pollution. Because the Basin has the distinction of being the only "extreme" area in the country, the compliance deadline was established as 2010. In the late 1980's, a lawsuit was filed in federal court challenging SCAQMD's plan for attainment with the required deadline of the 1977 CAA (December 31, 1987). The Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and directed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to prepare a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to provide adequate measures to bring the Basin into compliance with the CAA. 119 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OPPOSITION TO THE FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN October 5, 1994 Page #2 ANALYSIS: Under the court order, the FIP must be completed by February 1995. The initial draft of the FIP has been distributed and contains the following major issues: Pre-1999 truck and bus operators would be required to meet a fleet average emission rate or pay a fee based on the level of excess fleet emissions. In lieu of averaging fleet emissions, interstate vehicles could limit their stops to one within the non-attainment areas and 2 stops in California before leaving the state. Currently, 60 percent of freight trucks operating in California are based out-of-state. School districts within the Basin may be forced to replace their bus fleets or face emission fines of up to $600 million annually. Commercial airlines must reduce emissions from planes and associated equipment to a specific target or pay a fee on the excess emissions. The impact of this proposal could mean the loss of 39,000 jobs and $4 billion to the economy. United Parcel Service (UPS) has indicated they would have to move out-of-state in order to remain competitive. Experts reviewing the document indicate that the mandates and goals contained in the FIP are based on technology that does not currently exist. Beginning in 2001, a fee system would be instituted at the Port of Los Angeles. The base fee of $10,000 per ton of emissions is proposed. The only way to avoid the fee altogether is to comply with 3 operational changes: Connect to ground-based power while in port. Use low emissiom engines. Travel outside the Channel Islands. Each railroad company would be required to reduce the average emission rate of their locomotives through a phased process beginning in 2007. This will require the purchase of new locomotives or the conversion of existing locomotives. Facilities emitting more than 4 tons of volatile organic compounds (VOC) per year will be required to "cap" facility- wide emissions. These facilities would then be required to reduce emissions by at least 4% each year from 2001 through 2005, severely limiting expansion of existing and proposed facilities. 120 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT OPPOSITION TO THE FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN October 5, 1994 Page #3 In preparing the FIP, the EPA has not analyzed the potential economic impacts to California upon enactment of the plan. Information provided by Assemblyman Aguiar's office indicates that the FIP could result in the loss of 500,000 jobs and cost California $50 billion annually. To try and head-off the EPA's version of the FIP, SCAQMD and the California Air Resources Board (CARE) are beginning preparation of a State Implementation Plan (SIP). It is their hope that 1) the deadline to implement the FIP can be extended to allow completion of the SIP, and 2) the EPA will adopt the State plan as the FIP. It is anticipated that the SIP will be more sensitive to the current and future economic conditions of the State. Many people close to the process believe the court decision requiring the FIP did not. take into account the 1990 CAA amendments. Numerous organizations have been in contact with Congressional members requesting legislation to clarify the 1990 amendments. If this legislation is passed, these organizations believe the court ordered FIP preparation will no longer be required. Respectfully submitted, Charles J. Buquet, I Mayor Pro Tem Attachment: Resolution Opposing the Federal Implementation Plan 121 RESOLUTION NO. ~_ ~ ~D~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE FEDERAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN IN ITS CURRENT FORM WHEREAS, the environment and cleaner air is important to every Californian; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) designed to achieve air quality standards; and WHEREAS, the FIP consists of measures which are intended to reduce air emissions but will result in severe direct and indirect impacts to the state and local economies; and WHEREAS, California, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga in particular, are only now beginning to recover from a long and difficult economic recession; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has made great progress in creating and retaining jobs in the region; and WHEREAS, the FIP, as proposed, would put local businesses, agriculture, and industry at a severe competitive disadvantage compared to other regions and states, thus having a negative impact on our continued recovery; and WHEREAS, the FIP contains penalties and fees which will result in the loss of millions of dollars to the state and local economies; and WHEREAS, the FIP will result in significant loss of jobs and the lessening of the quality of life for our residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga opposes the Federal Implementation Plan in its current form. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT MEMORANDUM October 3, 1994 President and Members of the Board of Directors Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager ' r~ Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Directo SUBSTITUTION OF STAFF REPORT Please substitute the attached staff report for Fire Agenda Item D.2. Staff wanted to provide additional information concerning costs of the Arbitration settlement. RCD/dah RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STAFF REPORT DATE: October 5, 1994 TO: President and Members of the Fire Board Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: SUBJECT: Robert C. Dominguez, Administrative Services Director ADOPTION OF COMPENSATION RESOLUTION FOR MEMBERS OF FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274 Recommendation It is recommended that the Fire Board adopt the attached resolution which sets levels of compensation for various employees for fiscal year 1994/95, and retroactively to December 17, 1992. Background During the last two months staff has been meeting with Firefighters Local 2274 in an effort to establish levels of compensation based on the Arbitration Settlement of August 6, 1994. After considerable discussion a negotiated agreement was reached to establish rates of pay as follows: 7.5% for Captains, 6.7% for Engineers, and 5.9% for Fire fighters. Prospective implementation of the salary resolution can commence immediately at the beginning of the next full pay period. Retroactive costs payable from December 17, 1992, up to implementation of the new salary schedule shall be paid after computation of each employee's specific earnings. Retroactive Salary Retroactive costs are estimated to be approximately $560,000. The exact cost is not available at this time since each individual will have to have their precise salary, including overtime and benefits, calculated independently. This will take approximately 4 weeks. Once these are completed, staff will return to the Board to authorize appropriation from District reserves. It should be noted that District reserves which are already marginal, will be reduced further by the retroactive pay adjustment. Staff will be recommending that the funds be derived from the reserve accounts designated for "Charges in Economic Circumstances" and "Unforeseen Major Repairs." These reserves will be totally eliminated. FIRE BOARD MEETING Adoption of Compensation Resolution October 5, 1994 Page 2 Prospective Salary Negotiations are continuing with the Union regarding the method by which the District will pay for the ongoing annual costs of $300,323. The District budget cannot absorb these cost without budget restricting. Once these discussions are concluded, staff will advise the Board and request authorization for implementation of budget restricting. In the meantime, the Arbitration decision requires that the District implement the new salaries once they have been determined even prior to any decision on budget restricting. Summary The attached resolution sets salaries for Union members as agreed upon, and it's adoption satisfies the Arbitration ruling of August 6, 1994. Staff is recommending adoption while discussions continue with the Union on the method by which to pay for the adjustment. · Adiin~:Respectfully submitt~ce ed~ Director RCD/dah attachment SECTION Fire Chief 3% Deferred Comp Deputy Chief (Fire Marshal } 2% Deferred Comp Battalion Chief 56 Hr. Workweek Battalion Chief 40 Hr Workweek Adminstrative Captain Fire Captain Fire Engineer Firefighter Hazardous Material Premium Pay Captain Hazardous Material Premium Pay Engineer Hazardous Material Premium Pay Firefighter EXHIBIT "A" 1: Salary Ranges SAFETY A 36.63 2930.40 6349.20 6538.54 B 38.46 3076.92 6666.66 6865.46 C 40.38 3230.77 7000.00 7208.74 33 2664 5772 5887 .30 .00 .00 .44 34.97 2797.20 6060.60 6181.82 36. 2937. 6363. 6490. 71 06 63 91 19 2220 4810 .82 .00 .00 20.81 2331.00 5050.50 21.85 2447.55 5303.03 27 2220 4810 .75 .00 .00 29.14 2331.00 5050.50 30.59 2447.55 5303.03 16 1840 3987 .43 .45 .64 17.25 1932.47 4187.02 18. 2029. 4396. 12 !1 37 16 1840 3987 .43 .45 .64 17.25 1932.47 4187.02 18. 2029. 4396. 12 11 37 14 1582 3428 .13 .25 . 20 14.83 1661.36 3599.61 15. 1744. 3779. 58 43 59 12 1394 3023 .46 .43 .43 13.08 1465.20 3174.60 13. 1538. 3333. 74 46 33 17 1937 4197 .30 ,52 .95 18.12 2029.41 4397.06 18.98 2126.04 4606.42 14.99 1678.41 3636.55 15.69 1757.52 3807.97 16.43 1840.59 3987.94 13.31 1490.89 3230.27 13.93 1560.66 3381.44 14.59 1633.92 3540.17 D 42.40 3392.31 7350.00 7569.17 38.55 3083.91 6681.82 6815.45 22.95 2569.93 5568.18 32.12 2569.93 5568.18 19.02 2130.56 4616.20 19.02 2130.56 4616.20 16.35 1831.65 3968.57 14.42 1615.38 3500.00 19.89 2227.50 4826.24 17.21 1927.81 4176.92 15.28 1710.85 3706.84 E 44.52 3561.92 7717.50 7947.63 40.48 3238.11 7015.91 7156.22 24.09 2698.43 5846.59 33.73 2698.43 5846.59 19.97 2237.08 4847.00 19.97 2237.08 4847. O0 17.17 1923.73 4167.00 15.14 1696.15 3675.00 20.84 2334.02 5057.04 18.03 2019.39 4375.35 16.00 1791.62 3881.84 HOURLY BI -WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI -WEEKLY MO NTHL Y HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI -WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI -WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI -WEEKLY MONTHLY Resolution No. FD 92 Page Fire Prevention Inspector Hazardous Material Coordinator 20.98 21.97 23.01 24.10 25.24 HOURLY 1678.41 1757.52 1840.59 1927.81 2019.39 BI-WEEKLY 3636.55 3807.97 3987.94 4176.92 4375.35 MONTHLY 19.82 20.81 21.85 22.95 24.09 HOURLY 2220.00 2331.00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.43 BI-WEEKLY 4810.00 5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846.59 MONTHLY Deputy Fire Marshal 27.75 29.14 30.59 32.12 33.73 HOURLY {40 hr work week) 2220.00 2331.00 2447.55 2569.93 2698.42 BI-WEEKLY 4810.00 5050.50 5303.03 5568.18 5846.59 MONTHLY NON -SAFETY Admin Services 22.27 23.38 24.55 25.78 27.07 HOURLY Officer 1781.65 1870.73 1964.27 2062.48 2165.61 BI-WEEKLY 3860.24 4053.25 4255.91 4468.71 4692.15 MONTHLY 2% Deferred Comp 3938.99 4135.94 4342.74 4559.87 4787.87 Management 20.05 21.05 22.ll 23.21 24.37 HOURLY Analyst II 1604.00 1684.21 1768.42 1856.84 1949.68 BI-WEEKLY 3475.34 3649.11 3831.57 4023.15 4224.30 MONTHLY Maintenance Officer Maintenance Tech Communications Tech Fire Equipment Mechanic Fire Equip Serv Worker Fire Safety Analyst Fire Prevention S pec i ali st 20.43 1634.52 3541.47 15.62 1249.67 2707.6l 15.62 1249.67 2707.61 15.62 1249.67 2707.61 11.70 935.85 2027.67 21.58 1726.27 3740.26 15.94 1274.98 2762.46 13.59 1087.16 2355.51 Administrative Secretary 21.45 22.53 23.65 24.83 HOURLY 1716.25 1802.06 1892.16 1986.77 BI-WEEKLY 3718.54 3904.47 4099.69 4304.67 MONTHLY 16. 1312. 2842. 40 17.22 18.08 18.99 HOURLY 15 1377.76 1446.64 1518.98 BI-WEEKLY 99 2985.14 3134.40 3291.12 MONTHLY 16.40 1312.15 2842.99 17.22 1377.76 2985.14 16.40 1312.15 2842.99 17.22 1377.76 2985.14 12.28 982.64 2129.05 12.90 1031.77 2235.50 22. 1812. 3927. 18.08 1446.64 3134.40 16 1338 2900 18.08 1446.64 3134.40 13.54 1083.36 2347.28 66 23.79 24.98 59 1903.22 1998.38 27 4123.63 4329.82 .73 17.57 18.45 .73 1405.67 1475.95 .58 3045.61 3197.89 14.98 1198.59 2596.95 14.27 1141.51 2473.28 15.73 1258.52 2726.79 18.99 HOURLY 1518.98 BI-WEEKLY 3291.12 MONTHLY 18.99 HOURLY 1518.98 BI-WEEKLY 3291.12 MONTHLY 14.22 HOURLY 1137.53 BI-WEEKLY 2464.64 MONTHLY 26.23 HOURLY 2098.30 BI-WEEKLY 4546.31 MONTHLY 19.37 HOURLY 1549.75 BI-WEEKLY 3357.78 MONTHLY 16.52 HOURLY 1321.45 BI-WEEKLY 2863.13 MONTHLY Resolution No. FD Page Secretary Public Services Technician Office Specialist Office Specialist Apprentice Firefighter FMIS Technician 11.82 12.41 13.03 945.33 992.60 1042.23 2048.22 2150.63 2258.16 13.01 13.66 14.34 1040.89 1092.93 1147.58 2255.26 2368.02 2486.43 II 9.93 10.42 10.94 794.03 833.73 875.42 1720.40 1806.42 1896.74 13.68 1094.34 2371.07 15.06 1204.96 2610.75 11.49 919.19 1991.58 I 9.03 9.48 9.95 10.45 722.04 758.14 796.05 835.85 1564.43 1642.65 1724.78 1811.02 8.32 8.73 9.17 9.63 931.45 978.02 1026.92 1078.27 2018.13 2119.04 2224.99 2336.24 9.98 10.48 11.01 11.56 1118.08 1173.98 1232.68 1294.31 2422.50 2543.63 2670.81 2804.35 14.36 1149.06 2489.63 15.82 1265.21 274l. 28 12.06 965.15 2091.16 10.97 877.65 lg01.57 10.11 1132.18 2453.05 12.13 1359.03 2944.56 HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI -WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY HOURLY BI-WEEKLY MONTHLY Effective 10-5-94: Fire Prevention 14.13 14.83 15.58 16.35 17.17 HOURLY Inspector 1582.25 1661.36 1744.43 1831.65 1923.23 BI-WEEKLY 3428.20 3599.61 3779.59 3968.57 4167.00 MONTHLY