Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/09/07 - Agenda PacketCITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETINGS 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 p.m. September 7, 1994 Civic Center Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 City Councilmembers Dennis L. Stout, Mayor Charles J. Buquet, Mayor Pro Tem William J. Alexander, Councilmember Rex Gutierrez, Councilmember Diane Willisms, Councilmember Jack Lore, City Manager James L. Markman, City Attorney Debra J. Adams, City Clerk City Office: 989-1851 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 PAGE All items submitted for the City Council Agenda must be in writing. The dea.cLline for submitting these items is 6:00 p.m. on the Tuesday prior to the meeting. The City Clerk's Office receives all such items. 1. Roll Call: Buquet A. CALL TO ORDER AJexander , Stout Willi~ms , and Gutierrez B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. D. CONSFNT CAI FNDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember or member of the audience for discussion. Approval of Minutes: July 20. 1994 (Buquet absent) August 3, 1994 (Special Meeting] (Gutierrez absent] August 3. 1994 Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 8/10/94 and 8/17/94; and Payroll ending 7/28/94 for the total amount of $3,033,813.33. City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 PAGE 2 Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" for the Milliken Avenue Grade Separation Slope and Drainage Improvements;" located on Milliken Avenue south of Jersey Boulevard at the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA] Railroad Crossing (Formerly A.T. & S.F. Railway Co.) to be funded from Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B, Account No. 464130.9324. RESOLUTION NO. 94-164 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION SLOPE AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" for the Salina Avenue Street Improvements, located between Calaveras Avenue and Sierra Madre Avenue and Vinmar Avenue Street Improvements to 350 feet north of Salina Avenue, to be funded from CDBG Funds, Account No. 28-4333 -9318 RESOLUTION NO. 94-165 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SALINA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS: SALINA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CALAVERAS AVENUE AND SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND VINMAR AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO 350 FEET NORTH OF SALINA AVENUE, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to authorize the advertising of the 'Notice Inviting Bids" for the 1994/95 Fiscal Year Street Rehabilitation Program at various locations, which includes cape seal and slum/seal, to be funded from Account No. 01-4640-9400. 16 21 9 l0 15 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 PAGE 3 e e RESOLUTION NO. 94-166 a RESOLfJTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 1994/95 FISCAL YEAR STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAM AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, WHICH INCLUDES CAPE SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS Approval to appropriate $70,130.00 from Fund 24 - 'ISTEA" (Account 24-4637-9112) and $18,900.00 from Fund 32 - 'MEASURE I" (Account 32-4637-9112] for the Haven Avenue Street Improvements between Civic Center Drive and Foothill Boulevard; and to appropriate $61,660 from Fund 28 - 'CDBG" (Account 28- 4333-9329) for the Vinmar Avenue Street Improvements. Approval of Automated Public Information/Notification System. Approval to Release Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement for 9760 Lemon Avenue, located on the north side of Lemon Avenue, west of London Avenue, requested by Ray A. and Nancy Jones (APN 201-251-55). RESOLUTION NO. 94-167 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT WITH RAY A. AND NANCY JONES Approval to execute a Loan Agreement (CO 94-066) with Sanwa Bank for the financing of the Archibald Avenue Master Storm Drain and the 'Gap Loan" for the Northtown Housing Development Corporation's Villa Del Norre. RESOLUTION NO. 94-168 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE FINANCING OF A PORTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 22 26 27 30 31 32 34 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 PAGE 4 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Approval to execute a Joint Powers Agreement (CO 94-067) with the following citjes/counties to become a member of the Inland Library System:' San Bernardino County, Colton, Corona, Hemet, County of Inyo, Ontario, Palm Springs, Palo Verde Valley District, Riverside, San Bernardino, Upland, Banning and Beaumont. Approval to execute an agreement (CO 94-068) with OCLC Online Computer Library Center to provide shared on-line cataloging utilities for the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. Approval to execute Amendment No. 7 to the lease (CO 92-064) between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Incorporated pertaining to terms and conditions of payment regarding the Sports Complex expansion/special events lot. Approval to execute an agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between Church of God of Prophecy of Ontario, California and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-169 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM CHURCH OF GOD OF PROPHECY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME Approval to execute an agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between Western Latin Amedcan District, Church of the Nazarene and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-170 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM WESTERN LATIN AMERICAN DISTRICT, CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 35 58 176 182 183 184 185 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 PAGE 15. 16, 17. Approval to execute an agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements gnd Dedication of Rights-of-Way between Juana M. Sanchez ahd Guillermo Cabrera and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-171 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM JUANA M. SANCHEZ AND GUILLERMO CABRERA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME Approval to execute an agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between Calistio Gomez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-172 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM CALISTIO GOMEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME Approval to execute an agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between Maria A. Hernandez and the City of Rancha Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-173 a RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM MARIA A. HERNANOEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 186 187 188 189 190 191 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 18. ApprOval to execute an agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of-Way between Francisco Marti'nez and Evangelina Martinez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga, for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (budgeted CDBG project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-174 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM FRANCISCO MARTINEZ AND EVANGELINA MARTINEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME 19. Approval to execute Improvement Agreements and Improvement Securities for CUP 93-49, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues, submitted by Lewis Homes of California. RESOLUTION NO. 94-175 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 93-49 Approval to execute Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13565-1 thru -4 located on the northeast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road, submitted by Standard Pacific. RESOLUTION NO. 94-176 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13565-1 THRU 135654 21. Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Tract 12671-1 thru 12671-4 located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Mt. View Drive. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) $ lo3,4oo.a:] PAGE 192 193 194 195 197 199 200 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 PAGE 7 RESOLUTION NO. 94-177 a RESOLOTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12671-1 THRU 12671-4 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for Parcel Map 10185 located on the southwest comer of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue. Release: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) RESOLUTION NO. 94-178 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL MAP 10185 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept Improvements, Release of Bonds and Notice of Completion for the Church Street Medians (Tract 13717] located on Church Street Between Spruce Avenue and Elm Avenue East. Release: Faithful Performance Bond Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond S 64.(]:]:).00 6,400.00 RESOLUTION NO. 94-179 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CHURCH STREET MEDIANS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept the Etiwanda Community Trail Drainage Improvements, Contract No. 94-026, as complete, Release the Bonds, and Authorize the City Engineer to file a 'Notice of Completion. · 201 202 203 204 205 206 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 PAGE 8 RESOLUTION NO. 94-180 a RESOLdTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 94-026, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Approval to accept the Hellman Avenue and Ninth Street Improvement Project, Contract No. CO 94-029, as complete, Release the Bonds and Authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion" and approve the final contract amount of $~,828.~. RESOLUTION NO. 94-181 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HELLMAN AVENUE AND NINTH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK 207 208 209 F. CONSFNT ORDINANCFS The following Ordinances have had public hearings at the time of first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non-controversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion. No Items Submitted. F. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. The Chair will open the meeting to receive public testimony. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94- 08 - SANCHF7 - An appeal of the Planning Commission's condition of approval to perform a subdivision of the parcels in question as related to the establishment of a nightclub in the Community Commercial District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1077-601-07. 210 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 PAGE e CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving a request to construct a temporary multi-purpose building of approximately 3,840 square feet on approximately 5 acres in the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of East and Highland Avenues - APN: 227-071-77. RESOLUTION NO. 94-182 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-07, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING OF APPROXIMATELY 3,840 SQUARE FEET ON APPr~OXIMATELY 5 ACRES IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN. LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST AND HIGHLAND AVENUES AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-071-77 CONSIDERATION OF SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of various amendments to the Sign Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 536 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA. CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CONSIDERATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL REFUSE RATE REVIEW RESOLUTION NO. 94-183 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SETrING RATES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL REFUSE COLLECTION WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 244 290 293 318 325 327 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 CONSIDERATION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-0C> .- OAS - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Spedi~c Plan by adding Commercial Recreation as a permitted use in the Specialty Commercial District in Subareas 1 and 2. RESOLUTION NO. 94-184 a RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN BY ADDING INDOOR COMMERCIAL RECREATION AS A PERMITrED USE IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS 1 AND 2 PAGE 10 332 351 G. PUBLIC HFARINGS The following items have no legal requirements. The Chair will open public testimony. publication or posting the meeting to receive No Items Submitted. H. CITY MANAGFR'S STAFF RFPORTR The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. STATUS REPORT ON YOUTH ACCOUNTABILITY BOARD'S PROGRESS (Oral Report) I. COUNCIl BUSINFSS The following items have been requested by the City Council for discussion. They are not public hearing items, although the Chair may open the meeting for public input. 1. UPDATE REPORT BY MARKS CABLEVISION e CONSIDERATION TO DESIGNATE A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND AN ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ANNUAL MEETING 356 361 City Council Agenda September 7, 1994 3. UPDATE REPORT FROM ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE J. IDFNTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NFXT MFI~TINR This is the time for City Council to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. PAGE 11 364 K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THF PUBLIC This is the time and place for the general public to address the City Council. State law prohibits the City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. L. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 1, 1994, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54953 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. July 20, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CAI.I. TO ORDER A regular meeting of Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, July 20, 1994, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:40 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Jerry B. Fulwood, Deputy City Manager; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager; Brad Buller, City Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer;, Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Bob Dominguez, Administrative Services Director; Kathy Sorensen, Recreation Superintendent; Deborah Clark, Library Manager; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was Councilmember: Charles J. Buquet II. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS No announcements or presentations were made. C. COMMUNICATIONS No communications were made from the public. DI. FROM THE PUBLIC D. CONSENT CAI.ENDAR Approval of Minutes: June 1, 1994 (Stout) June 16, 1994 July 6, 1994 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 6/29/94 (FY 93/94), 6/29/94 (FY 94/95), 7/6/94 (FY 93/94), 7/6/94 (FY 94/95); and Payroll ending 6/16/94 for the total amount of $2,100,247.55. D3. Approval to receive and fde current Investment Schedule as of July 30, 1994. City Council Minutes July 20, 1994 Page 2 D4. Alcoholic Beverage Application for Off Sale General for Town & Country Liquor, Issa and Mtanos Hawam, 12962-64 Foothill Boulevard. D5. Approval to adopt Annual Statement of Investment Policy. D6. Approval to adopt Compensation Resolution for Fiscal Year 1994/95. RESOLUTION NO. 94-144 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 94-132 AND IMPLEMENTING SALARY AND BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 D7. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Installation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of- Way between William J. Beard Jr. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (Budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-145 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM WILLIAM J. BEARD JR. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME D8. Approval to execute an Agreement for the Insta/lation of Street Improvements and Dedication of Rights-of- Way between William McKinley Walton Jr. and the City of Rancho Cucamonga for the conslxuction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street (Budgeted CDBG Project). RESOLUTION NO. 94-146 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM WILLIAM MCKINLEY WALTON JR. AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME D9. Approval to execute Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) Memorandum of Understanding (CO 94- 052) for Fiscal Year 1994/95. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER WILLIAMS. D10. Approval to authorize the execution of Professional Service Agreement with RMA Group (CO 94-053) for Soils Testing of Public Works Design and Construction Projects at Various Locations City Wide, for Fiscal Year 1994/95, to be funded from the appropriate Capital Improvement Project Accounts at the specified rates. D11. Approval to authorize the execution of Professional Services Agreements with Associated Engineers (CO 94-054 ) and Wagner Pacific (CO 94-055) for Surveying of Public Works Design and Construction Projects at Various Locations City Wide, for Fiscal Year 1994/95, to be funded from the appropriate Capital Improvement Project Accounts at the specified rates. City Council Minutes July 20, 1994 Page 3 D12. Approval to award and authorization to execute Contract (CO 94-056) for Resurfacing of Traffic Deck/Parking Structure Improvement Project, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, to Ladner Coatings for the amount of $174,312.00 ($158,465.00 plus 10% contingency), to be funded with RDA Funds Account No. 17- 15000. D13. Approval to execute Amendment No. 6 (CO 92-064) to the Lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc. which describes the terms and responsibilities of each party for the left field scoreboard. D14. Approval to execute Improvement Agreement, Improvement Security and Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B and Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 and 6 for CUP 93-17, located at the northwest comer of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street, submitted by Shepherd of the Hills Lutheran Church. RESOLUTION NO. 94-147 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR CUP 93-17 RESOLUTION NO. 94-148 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B AND STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1 AND 6 FOR CUP 93-17 D15. Approval to accept the Haven Avenue Rehabilitation Project, From Civic Center Drive to Foothill Boulevard, Contract No. 93-031, as complete, Release the Bonds and Authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." RESOLUTION NO. 94-149 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HAVEN AVENUE REHABILITATION PROJECT FROM CIVIC CENTER DRIVE TO FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, CONTRACT NO. 93-03 1, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK D16. Approval to accept the Chaffey-Garcia Barn Construction Project, Contract No. 93-071, as complete, Release Bonds, and authorize the City Manager to file a "Notice of Completion." RESOLUTION NO. 94-150 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE CHAFFEY-GARCIA BARN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, CO 93-071, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK City Council Minutes July 20, 1994 Page 4 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item D9, with Gutierrez abstaining from voting on the Investment Schedule, and with Stout abstaining from voting on the June 1, 1994 minutes. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Buquet absen0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D9. Approval to execute Drug Abuse Resistance (D.A.R.E.) Memorandum of Understanding (CO 94-052) for Fiscal Year 1994/95. Education Councilmember Williams felt the staff report implied that the City does not know where the money would come from to fund this program. Jack Lain, City Manager, stated the City does have this covered in the budget for the next year. MOTION: Moved by Willjams, seconded by Alexander to approve Item D9. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 94-01 - GENERAL DYNAMICS - Review of a Development Agreement for the Redevelopment of 380 acres of land, the Subarea 18 Specific Plan, bounded on the south by 4th Street, on the east by Milliken Avenue, on the north by the A.T. & S.F. (Metrolink) Railroad, and on the west by Cleveland Avenue and Utica Avenue - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, and 08; 210-081-22 and 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 and 39; and 210-361-01 through 26. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 526. ORDINANCE NO. 526 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 94- 01, FOR SUBAREA 18 SPECIFIC PLAN, AS PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 65864 OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE, FOR REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 209-272-01, 04, 07, AND 08; 210-081-22 AND 23; 210-082-02, 11, 17, 37, 38 AND 39; AND 210-361-01 THROUGH 26 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 526. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). E2. CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - WESTERN LAND PROPERTIES - A request to amend the land use designation for a 25-acre piece of vacant land from Office Professional District to Community Commercial District bounded by Foothill Boulevard on the south, Spruce Avenue on the west, Church Street on the north, and Elm Avenue on the east, and the related text and graphic changes - APN: 1077-421-58 and 63. City Council Minutes July 20, 1994 Page 5 Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 527. ORDINANCE NO. 527 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USE MAP FROM OFFICE PROFESSIONAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL FOR 25 ACRES OF LAND BOUNDED BY FOOTHILL BOULEVARD ON THE SOUTH, SPRUCE AVENUE ON THE WEST, CHURCH STREET ON THE NORTH, AND ELM AVENUE ON THE EAST AND AMENDING VARIOUS TEXT AND GRAPHICS OF THE COMMUNITY PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 1077-421-58 AND 63 MOTION: Moved by Williams, seconded by Alexander to waive full reading and approve Ordinance No. 527. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). F. ADVERTISED PUBI,IC HEARINGS F1. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request for various sU'eamlining amendments to the Development/Design Review procedures and Land Use regulations. CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Types, Land Use Type Definitions, and the permitted and conditionally permitted uses of various subareas. CONSIDERATION OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Regulations for Suburea 1, 2, 3, and 4 regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses. CONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94.01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Provisions regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses for Office and Commercial Districts. CONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Neighborhood Commercial District. CONSIDERATION OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94.01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. CONSIDERATION OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. City Council Minutes July 20, 1994 Page 6 CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the time extension provisions. Staff report presented by Brad Buller, City Planner. Mayor Smut opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. Councilmember Alexander thanked the Planning Commission for their work on this. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 528, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533 and 534. ORDINANCE NO. 528 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 94-02, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO STREAMLINE THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS, AND MODIFYING THE LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 529 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03, AMENDING THE LAND USE TYPES, LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS, AND THE LAND USES WITHIN VARIOUS SUBAREA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF RESOLUTION NO. 94-151 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 530 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 531 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Minutes July 20, 1994 Page 7 ORDINANCE NO. 532 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 533 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITH/N THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 534 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 16, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance Nos. 528 through 534 for August 3, 1994 and to also approve Resolution No, 94-151. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Buquet). G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS HI. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION FOR PURCHASE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FREEWAY TO FREEWAY INTERCHANGE BETWEEN INTERSTATF. 15 AND ROUTE 30 (Oral Report) Staff report presented by Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, who stated the Resolution was being presented at the request of Caltrans. He stated it does not lock the City into anything at this time, but recommended that the City approve the Resolution to allow Caltrans to proceed. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public comment. There being no response, public comments were closed. RESOLUTION NO. 94-152 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CALTRANS TO PURCHASE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A FREEWAY TO FREEWAY INTERCHANGE BETWEEN INTERSTATE 15 AND ROUTE 30 City Council Minutes July 20, 1994 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to approve Resolution No. 94-152. unanimously, 4-0-1 (Buquet absen0. Motion carried I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. UPDATE REPORT ON CITY SEAL Mayor Stout felt the lemon should be a little more yellow and the orange a little more orange Councilmember Alexander and Williams commended Nina Cole for her work on the City Seal also. Mayor Stout stated he would like to see it when it is changed. ACTION: Report received and fried. 12. INFORMATIONAL REPORT ON YOUTH PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE CITY Staff report presented by Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager. Councilmember Alexander commented on how important programs for the youth are and felt the City should pursue this and work together with other entities for this project Mrs. Gibbons, 4th grade teacher at Los Amigos School, presented information on a project her class had done regarding government. She stated her students felt a youth center would help the community. She added she had been told that funding was the problem for this next year, but hoped the City could work something out. Cybil Moon, student, told the Council they needed a youth center to help get rid of crime by keeping kids busy. Ron Lin, student, told about the importance of a youth center and also presented a poster for the Council to view which displayed the importance of why a youth center was needed. Christopher Tom, student, had a proposal as to what was needed. He stated the kids needed a youth center to stop violence. Jane Kurcher, Juvenile Justice Department, stated she supported the comments made by the kids. Mayor Stout stated he had received a letter from the kids and had responded, and that the City is in the process of getting copies of it to the teacher and the students. He stated the comments made tonight were very well token. Councilmember Gutierrez complimented the 4th grade teacher for the job she is doing with the kids. He stated the City would do its best to help. He thanked the kids for coming and for their input. Councilmember Williams expressed concerns for the kids getting transportation to a center if there was one. She also commended the kids for their input. City Council Minutes July 20, 1994 Page 9 Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager, stated this is also being discussed at the Park and Recreation Commission meeting tomorrow night. Councilmember Alexander felt the City needed to work with the school system on this issue. He stated the City should pursue this and that it should be available to all kids. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to refer the matter to the Park and Recreation Commission to explore alternatives for this. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). Mayor Stout added the exhibits presented would be made a part of the City's record. .I. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING J1. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like to report to the City Council what the Historic Preservation Subcommittee of the Council and Planning Commission have been working on at the next meeting. J2. Councilmember Gutierrez would like a report on the status of the graffiti removal program. Mayor Stout reported on a letter he had received from a resident that had been caught in the act of spray painting with her kids, and wanted to be excused of the charges against her. J3. Councilmember Alexander would like a memo to come back to the Council after the Park and Recreation Commission discusses the youth program issue. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC KI. Gayle Hinazumi, with CCAR and resident of the City, talked about the meeting CCAR had with Councilmembers Buquet and Willjams and stated that both Councilmembers gave their support of the formation of an Ad-Hoc Committee. She asked that this be discussed at the August 3 meeting for approval of the Ad-Hoc Committee and to schedule the first meeting of the Committee prior to August 15. She also wanted to confn'm that the July 25 public ~neeting has been postponed to October. K2. Gary Kenchick commented that the Alta Loma School Board finally decided to move the portable buildings up on Beryl, but that they would be moved to the east side of the Alta Loma Elementary campus. He stated they have allocated money for plans to be submitted to the City to turn the dirt path into a one way road going from Archibald to Amethyst to make it a way for their buses to go in and out. He stated in the process they will be taking out a lot of trees on the east side. He asked that the Council not allow the trees to be removed. Councilmember Alexander suggested possibly the Public Safety Subcommittee work on this issue and bring it back to the Council. Councilmember Wi!liams felt the Public Works Subcommittee should work on it because of the street. She felt Mr. Kenchick could meet with the City Planner. Mayor Stout suggested Jack Lam talk to the Superintendent as to what is going on. City Council Minutes July 20, 1994 Page 10 Councilmember Willjams suggested a report come back and be agendized at a later date if needed. I,. ADJOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Williams to recess to Executive Session to discuss Property per Government Code Section 54956.8, with Ampac, located at 12167 Arrow Route, Rancho Cucamonga; and existing litigation per Government Code Section 54956.9 re Case Number RCV 056436, Ampac vs City of Rancho Cucamonga. Motion carried unanimously, 4-0-1 (Buquet absent). The meeting recessed at 8:45 p.m. The Council reconvened at 9:00 p.m. to announce they had approved the Settlement Agreement with Ampac by a 4-0-1 (Buquet absent) vote. The Council adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Respectively Submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: August 3, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Special Meeting A. CA!,I, TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, August 3, 1994, in the Rains Conference Room, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:43 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet H, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; Robert Deminguez, Administrative Services Director;, Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, Brad Buller, City Planner; Scott Murphy, Associate Planner; Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief L. Dennis Michael; Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. Absent was Councilmember: Rex Gutierrez. B. ITEM OF DISCUSSION B1. PRESENTATION BY ASSEMBLYMAN FRED AGUIAR ON THE FINAL STATE BUDGET PACKAGE Mayor Stout introduced Assemblyman Fred Aguiar. Assemblyman Aguiar presented information on the adopted budget for California and answered various questions from the Council and City Manager. He also introduced Jeff Gibson, a new employee in his office. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communication was made from the public. City Council Minutes August 3, 1994 Page 2 D. ADJOURNMENT The City C6uncil recessed at 6:26 p.m. until its regularly scheduled meeting at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted, Debra I. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: August 3, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Regular Meeting A. CAI,I, TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council was held on Wednesday, August 3, 1994, in the Council Chambers of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 7:06 p.m. by Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Present were Councilmembers: William J. Alexander, Charles J. Buquet II, Rex Gutierrez, Diane Williams, and Mayor Dennis L. Stout. Also present were: Jack Lam, City Manager; James Markman, City Attorney; Linda D. Daniels, RDA Manager;, Rick Gomez, Community Development Director; Karen Emery, Associate Park Planner;, Brad Buller, City Planner, Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer; Bob Zetterberg, Integrated Waste Coordinator, Bill Makshanoff, Building Official; Deborah Clark, Library Manager, Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II; Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I; Chief Dennis Michael, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District; Capt. Bruce Zeiner, Rancho Cucamonga Police Department; and Debra J. Adams, City Clerk. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Mayor Stout stated he will not be present at the August 17, 1994 meeting. B2. Councilmember Buquet stated that on August 9, the Quakes will be sponsoring Law Enforcement Night at the stadium with a portion of the proceeds going to the D.A.R.E. program. C. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBI.IC CI. Marcus Solomon, 9130 Foothill, stated he had just returned from Russia's Goodwill Games. He presented the Council with souvenirs. D. CONSENT CAI,ENDAR D 1. Approval of Minutes: June 15, 1994 D2. Approval of Warrants, Register Nos. 7/13/94 (FY 93/94) and 7/13/94 (FY 94/95); and Payroll ending 6/30 94 for the total amount of $945,092.68. City Council Minutes August 3, 1993 Page 2 D3. Alcoholic Beverage Application for On-Sale General Eating Place for Pepper's Lounge & Restaurant, John L. and Lou June Forti, 9740 19th Street. D4. Approval to receive Waste Oil Recycling Grant and establishing the Fiscal Year 1994/95 budget, and amending the City's budget for Fiscal Year 1994/95. D5. Approval to continue appropriations from various funding sources for Fiscal 1993/94 Capital Improvement Projects which are continuing in Fiscal Year 1994/95. ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT. D6. Approval to transfer a vehicle to the County of Sun Bernardino for use with the D.A.R.E. program. D7. Approval to grant an easement in favor of GTE California Incorporated for a portion of Parcel 3, Parcel .Map No. 11286, located at Milliken Avenue south of Base Line, and in addition, grant a bill of sale for equipment located on the site in favor of the same. RESOLUTION NO. 94-153 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE GRANT OF EASEMENT FOR A PORTION OF PARCEL 3, PARCEL MAP NO. 11286 AND GRANTING A BILL OF SALE FOR EXISTING EQUIPMENT ALL IN FAVOR OF GTE CALIFORNIA INCORPORATED, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO SIGN SAID DOCUMENTS AND CITY CLERK TO ATTEST THE SAME D8. Approval to execute Sun Bernardino County's Schedule "A" for Law Enforcement Services (C0 944)17) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of $8,006,269.00 ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT. D9. Approval to execute an extension of the Agreement (CO 90-143) for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Districts 1 and 5, with Landscape West, Incorporated of Anaheim, California in the amount of $170,751.24, to be funded by: Landscape Maintenance District 1, Fund 40-4130-6028 ($170,254.68) and Landscape Maintenance District 5, Fund 44-4130-6028 ($496.56). ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. D10. Approval to execute an extension of the Agreement (CO 90-144) for the Landscape and Irrigation Contract for Landscape Maintenance District 2 (Victoria) and Landscape Maintenance District 4 (Tetra Vista) with Landscape West, Incorporated of Anaheim, California in the amount of $596,619.72 to be funded by: Landscape Maintenance District 2, Fund 41-4130-6028 ($469,524.72) and Landscape Maintenance District 4, Fund 43-4130-6028 ($127,095.0). ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. Dll. Approval to execute an extension of the Agreement (CO 90-145) for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Conu'act for the General Fund Parkways and Landscape Maintenance Districts 3A and 3B with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Incorporated of Irwindale, California in the amount of $210,497.28 to be funded by: General Fund 01-4647-6028 ($148,309.80), Landscape Maintenance District 3A, Fund 42-4130-6028 ($1,183.44) and Landscape Maintenance District 3B, Fund 46-4130-6028 ($61,004.04). ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ. D12. Approval to execute an Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 13753, located on the north side of Ellena Street, north of Base Line Road, submitted by Lewis Homes. City Council Minutes August 3, 1994 Page 3 RESOLUTION NO. 94-154 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13753 D13. Approval to accept Improvements, and Release of Security for Tract 12895, located on the west side of Baker Street, south of Foothill Boulevard. Release: Faithful Performance Letter of Credit (Private Streets) $ 118,000.00 RESOLUTION NO. 94-155 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12895 D14. Approval to Release Maintenance Guarantee Bond for Tract 13858, located at the southwest comer of Milliken Avenue and Banyan Street. Release: Maintenance Guarantee Bond (Street) $ 26,274.00 D15. Approval to accept the Athletic Field Lighting Touch Pad Systems, located at Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park, CO 94-018, as complete, Release the Bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." ITEM REMOVED FOR DISCUSSION BY MAYOR STOUT. RESOLUTION NO. 94-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING TOUCH PAD SYSTEMS, LOCATED AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK AND HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK, CO 94-018, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Gutierrez to approve the staff recommendations in the staff reports contained in the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items DS, D8, D9, D10, Dll, D15. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM DS. Approval to continue appropriations from various funding sources for Fiscal 1993/94 Capital Improvement Projects which are continuing in Fiscal Year 1994/95. Mayor Stout stated he was missing part of the staff report in order for him to make a decision on this. Staff provided him with the page he was missing. City Council Minutes August 3, 1993 Page 4 DISCUSSION OF ITEM D8. Approval to execute San Bernardino County's Schedule "A" for Law Enforcement Services (CO 94-017) for the City of Rancho Cucamonga in the amount of $8,006,269.00 Mayor Smut stated he did not have a Schedule A in his packet. Jack Lam, City Manager, stated the Schedule A's were not put in the packet, but that Bruce Zeiner has it. He stated he has reviewed it and that it is in line with the City's budget. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D15. Approval to accept the Athletic Field Lighting Touch Pad Systems, located at Red Hill Community Park and Heritage Community Park, CO 94-018, as complete, Release the Bonds and authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Completion." RESOLUTION NO. 94-156 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ATHLETIC FIELD LIGHTING TOUCH PAD SYSTEMS, LOCATED AT RED HILL COMMUNITY PARK AND HERITAGE COMMUNITY PARK, CO 94-018, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK Mayor Smut stated the final operating procedures for the much pads were not outlined in the report and asked for an explanation. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, gave a brief description of the system. Councilmember Williams asked if the sports groups liked this system. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated they seemed to feel it was appropriate. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Williams to approve Items D5, D8 and D15. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. DISCUSSION OF ITEM D9. Approval to execute an extension of the Agreement (CO 90- 143) for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for Landscape Maintenance Districts 1 and 5, with Landscape West, Incorporated of Anaheim, California in the amount of $170,751.24, to be funded by: Landscape Maintenance District 1, Fund 40-4130-6028 ($170,254.68) and Landscape Maintenance District 5, Fund 44-4130-6028 ($496.56). DISCUSSION OF ITEM D10. Approval to execute an extension of the Agreement (CO 90- 144) for the Landscape and Irrigation Contract for Landscape Maintenance District 2 (Victoria) and Landscape Maintenance District 4 (Terra Vista) with Landscape West, Incorporated of Anaheim, California in the amount of $596,619.72 to be funded by: Landscape Maintenance District 2, Fund 41-4130-6028 ($469,524.72) and Landscape Maintenance District 4, Fund 43-4130-6028 ($127,095.0). City Council Minutes August 3, 1994 Page 5 DISCUSSION OF ITEM Dll. Approval to execute an extension of the Agreement (CO 90- 145) for the Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance Contract for the General Fund Parkways and Landscape Maintenance Districts 3A and 3B with Mariposa Horticultural Enterprises, Incorporated of Irwindale, California in the amount of' $210,497.28 to be funded by: General Fund 01-4647-6028 ($148,309.80), Landscape Maintenance District 3A, Fund 42-4130-6028 ($1,183.44) and Landscape Maintenance District 3B, Fund 46-4130-6028 ($61,004.04). Councilmember Gutierrez asked if these were a year-to-year renewal. Joe O'Neil, City Engineer, stated that was correct Councilmember Gutierrez asked questions as to what the responsibilities of the landscape contractor were, with Joe O'Neil responding. MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Alexander to approve Items D9, D10 and Dll. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. E. CONSENT ORDINANCES El. CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request for various streamlining amendments to the Development/Design Review procedures and Land Use regulations. CONSIDERATION OF INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Types, Land Use Type Definitions, and the permitted and conditionally permitted uses of various subareas. CONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Land Use Provisions regarding permitted and conditionally permitted uses for Office and Commercial Districts. CONSIDERATION OF ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Neighborhood Commercial District. CONSIDERATION OF VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. CONSIDERATION OF TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the Office and Commercial areas. CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the time extension provisions. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 528, 529, 530, 531,532, 533 and 534. City Council Minutes August 3, 1993 Page 6 ORDINANCE NO. 528 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADO~G DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 94-02, AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO STREAMLINE THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS, AND MODIFYING THE LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR COMMERCIAL/OFFICE DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 529 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING INDUSTRIAL AREA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-03, AMENDING THE LAND USE TYPES, LAND USE TYPE DEFINITIONS, AND THE LAND USES WITHIN VARIOUS SUBAREA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 530 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SLIPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 531 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 532 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF ORDINANCE NO. 533 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING TERRA VISTA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, AMENDING THE LAND USES WITHIN THE OFFICE AND COMMERCIAL AREAS, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Minutes August 3, 1994 Page 7 ORDINANCE NO. 534 (second reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 16, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF MOTION: Moved by Gutierrez, seconded by Buquet to waive full reading and approve Ordinance Nos. 528, 529, 530, 531,532, 533 and 534. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F. ADVERTISED PUBI,IC HEARINGS Ft. CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT (NDFE) Councilmember Alexander presented the report. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. There being no response, the public hearing was closed. RESOLUTION NO. 94-157 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE NONDISPOSAL FACILITY ELEMENT AS REQUIRED BY AB3001 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Alexander to approve Resolution No. 94-157. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. F2. CONSIDERATION OF THE VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - A request to amend the Victoria Planned Community pertaining to the timing of the construction of Ellena Park. Staff report presented by Karen Emery, Associate Park Planner. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public hearing. Addressing the City Council was: Gary Luque of Lewis Homes and Merchant Builders, who stated he would be happy to answer any questions the Council has. He stated they are ready to start the park immediately. There being no further response, the public hearing was closed. Debra J. Adams, City Clerk, read the title of Ordinance No. 535. ORDINANCE NO. 535 (first reading) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VICTORIA COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 94-02, TO MODIFY THE COMMUNITY PLAN TEXT PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELLENA PARK, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF City Council Minutes August 3, 1993 Page 8 MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Williams to waive full reading and set second reading of Ordinance No. 535 for August 17. Motion.carried unanimously, 5-0. G. PUBLIC HEARINGS No items were submitted. H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS H1. CONSIDERATION TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT (CO 94-059) FOR THE RECIPROCAL WAIVER OF FEES BETWI~.EN ~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAl. WATER DISTRICT Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director. MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Gutierrez to approve CO 94-059. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. H2. STATUS REPORT/UPDATE ON ROUTE 30 FREEWAY Staff report presented by Rick Gomez, Community Development Director. Councilmember Gutierrez questioned the make-up of the committee. Mayor Stout opened the meeting for public commenL Addressing the City Council were: Gayle Hinazumi, CCAR, stated she would like to make some suggestions for the make-up of the Ad-Hoc Committee. She stated they would like more than one member of the City Council on the Committee. They would like the public to be allowed to be present at the meetings. They felt the City Manager should be involved in the committee because of his expertise. They did not feel the City should be divided into Cucamonga, Etiwanda and Alta Loma. They felt six residents should be appointed from Rancho Cucamonga. They suggested the residents live within a one-half mile radius of the freeway from the east, middle, and west sides and open to those residents who will be direc~y affected by the freeway. CCAR asked that these suggestions be considered by the City Council. They asked that the Committee stay in place until all issues are resolved. Wendy Vallette, 11116 Amarillo, stated she supported what Ms. Hinazumi expressed. She asked that Council focus on the goal of this Committee before they decide who should sit on it. She felt at this time the Council meetings should be televised so the public could become informed on the issues. There being no further input, public comments were closed. Councilmember Alexander stated he would like to be the Councilperson to be on the Committee. James Markman, City Attorney, stated he did not feel the City Manager should be on the Committee because of any voting that would take place. Councilmember Alexander stated he agreed with the six at-large member idea. City Council Minutes August 3, 1994 Page 9 Councilmember Williams stated she did not feel the members should be limited to those people along the freeway corridor. She added the three communities idea was not to separate the City. She felt if six at-large people were placed on the Committee, it would only be people who were really interested anyway. She did not feel too many Councilmembers should be on the Committee and that the number should be limited. She suggested that one staff person be involved in the meetings and be the keeper of the information. She suggested various expert sources, i.e., Automobile Club of Southern California, could also assist the Committee. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he felt two Councilmembers would be adequate and that two Planning Commissioners would be sufficient also. He stated he had no problems with the meetings being televised. He stated he had no problems with the City Manager sitting in on the meetings. Mayor Stout felt the City Manager could be the lead staff person, and he could designate whoever he wanted to also be involved. He felt there should be two Councilmembers and two Planning Commissioners. He felt there should be six corridor representatives and should be at least two members from outside the corridor. Councilmember Alexander stated he liked the idea of extending the public number to eight - 6 corridor and 2 non- corridor. James Markman, City Attorney, warned the Council there should not be more than two Councilmembers at these meetings or it would violate the Brown AcL Councilmember Buquet suggested the City present its desired plan to the Committee to get their input. He felt the size of the group should not be too large or it would be hard to get things done. He did not feel the Committee meetings should be televised because he felt it would decrease productivity. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet that there be: 2 Councilmembers 2 Planning Commissioners (Chair and Vice Chair) 6 Corridor members (2 on the west side, 2 on the east side and 2 in the middle of the City) 2 Non-corridor - at large 2 Chamber members (President and Vice President) 1 City Manager's office 2 CCAR representatives Councilmembers Alexander and Buquet to serve as the Members with Williams to serve as the Alternate. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. Mayor Stout asked that the CCAR representatives submit their letter with their designees by the fast of next week. He added he liked Councilmember Buquet's idea of making a plan to present to the Committee. He felt administrative guidelines for the Committee should also be developed. He felt all of the information should be sent to the City Council for its consideration on a continuing basis in order for decisions to be made relating to policy. James Markman, City Attorney, pointed out that this committee will have to follow Brown Act regulations which will include setting a regular meeting date with agendas also posted. Mayor Stout stated he would like a ~nalized report as to what was decided tonight. City Council Minutes August 3, 1993 Page 10 Councilmember Alexander asked if this would come back at the first meeting in September for the forrealization of this with regards to the make-up of the Committee. Mayor Stout suggested that the two Council representatives, the two Planning Commissioners and the two CCAR representatives come back with the process they are going to use, not make the actual selections. Then they can decide how long it will take to get those people on board. H3. UPDATE REPORT ON LIBRARY BOARD OF DIRECTORS INTERVIEWS (ORAL REPORT) Mayor Stout stated he and Councilmember Williams came up with a short list of nine candidates for the Council to interview. He added a date needed to be set for the whole Council to conduct the interviews. ACTION: The Council concurred to conduct the interviews on Monday, August 22, 1994, 6:00 p.m. in the Tri- Communities Conference Room. I. COUNCIl, BUSINESS I1. STATUS REPORT ON GRAFFITI REMOVAL PROGRAM Jack Lain, City Manager, stated it is requested that this item be continued to the August 17 meeting. The Council concurred. I2. UPDATE BY COUNCILMEMBER GUTIERREZ ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE MATTERS Councilmember Gutierrez presented the report. Mayor Stout stated he would like to get an inventory of all of the people we have done oral histories on. He stated he would like to know if there is a plan for obtaining oral histories from some of our residents. He felt there are a lot of great people that oral histories should be done on. Councilmember Buquet felt this might be a good time to get an update on the oral history program. Councilmember Gutierrez stated they would provide that to the Council. He felt the Library might be a good place to display physical oral history information. I3. DISCUSSION OF INTERIM AGRICULTURAL USE FOR CENTRAL PARK Mayor Stout stated he wanted this item to be agendized because he thought the Central Park property is looking very bad. He stated he has talked to some of the winery people in the City to see if the vineyards on the property could be put back in cultivation. He asked for staff to contact the winery people to look into this. City Council Minutes August 3, 1994 Page 11 Councilmember Buquet stated some of the cities he works with have planted wild flowers, and that would also look very nice. ACTION: The Council concurred with the ideas presented. .L IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Jl. Councilmember Buquet would like to have a workshop on the Regional Mall with the Hahn Company as to what the status is on this project. He suggested the subcommittee could coordinate setting up the workshop and bring this back to the Council. Councilmember Buquet stated he would give this update at the August 17 meeting. J2. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like an informational update on the NASCAR project in Fontana and the impacts it would have on Rancho Cucamonga. J3. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he would like an informational report from the Police Department on the eleven new staff and how they are working and the impacts it has had on burglaries and car thefts. J4. Councilmember Alexander stated he would like to give a report at the next meeting on the "Safe Key" program after visiting other cities who have this program. J5. Councilmember Alexander stated he would like a progress report on the Police and Fire Departments' cable tv messages. K. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PUBLIC No communications were made from the public. I,. AD.IOURNMENT MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by Buquet to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss anticipated litigation per Government Cede 54956.9, City of Rancho Cucamonga vs Hydrotech; and Property per Government Code Section 54956.8, located on the east side of Rochester, south of Foothill, with Valley Baseball; James Markman and Linda Daniels negotiators; concerning price and terms of payment. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. not to reconvene with no action taken in Executive Session. Respectfully submitted, Debra J. Adams, CMC City Clerk Approved: CiTY OF RANCHQ CUL...dNGA LIST OF HARMANTS FOR PERIOD: 08-I0-94 C94/95) RUN OATE: 09/11/9~ PAGE: 1 VENDOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION HARM NO HARM. AnT. 6067 TUCKER, THOMAS E. L JOYCE A. 509 XEROX CORPORATION 50 CHECKI OVERLAP DEPOSIT REFUND I 68)638 ((( 11366 - 88584 COPY MACHINE SUPPLXES/SERVZCE g 885855 ((( 88586 - 88678 8025 WESTIN HOTEL RESERVATIONS · 886790 404.44 2731 UNZGLOBE REGENCY TRAVEL CONOEX MEETING · 88680e 740.00 3603 NELSON, TIN INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 186815 1,200.00 16,115o72- Z,361038- ((( 81682 - 88682 POSTAGE LANDSCAPE NEHSLETTER 686838 ((( 11614 - 69038 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE g 89039 8USINESS LICENSE REFUND 890~0 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89041 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE I 89042 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89043 OFFICE SUPPLIES 89044 DEPOSIT REFUND 89045 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 89046 MONTHLY MAINTENANCE SERVICE 89047 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES I 89048 ENGRAVEO PLAQUE 890~9 RECREATION REFUNO 89050 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 89051 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES t 89052 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 89053 COHNUTER OF THE NORTH 89054 RECREATION REFUND 89055 VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE 89056 RECREATION REFUND · 89057 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 89058 RECREATION REFUNO 89059 PAPER I 89060 SUBSCRIPTION G VZOEO 69061 HAINTENANCE/VEHXCLE SUPPLIES 89062 RECREATION REFUND I 89063 RECREATION REFUND 89064 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES B 89065 BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO 89066 RECREATION SUPPLIES 89067 REXNBURSE FOR POLICE REPORT 89068 RECREATION REFUND 89069 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 89070 EQUZPMENT RENTAL/SUPPLZES 6907I BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89072 SERVICE/REPAIRS · 89073 SUBSCRIPTION 19074 MAINTENANCE REPAIRS/SUPPLIES 89075 MONTHLY SERVICE 89076 SIGNAL NAZNTENANCE/SUPPLZES I eOOT7 CONPUTER MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES 89078 RECREATION REFUND 89079 350 U. Se POSTMASTER 4,S00.00 lO A G R TIRE SERVICE 6473 A TO Z BUSINESS FORMS L COMPUTER 6474 A-AIR 35Z9 ALAR GLASS 6475 ALTA LONA COUNSELING 1430 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS 6509 ANPAC 24 ARBOR NURSERY ZNC. Z437 ASSOCIATED PLANTSCAPERS, INC. 2616 AUTO PARTS COMPANY, INC 1061 AHAROS 8T CHANPZON 6476 BACA, ODETTE 4229 DACICH, PATRICK 33 BASELINE TRUE VALUE NARDHARE 6508 REAL 8ARC, S.Ao 6477 BICKER, CAT·BY 6478 BELL, CNERYL 1338 BIG A AUTO PARTS 6479 8ORCHAROT, MATT 6504 IT - PARAMOUNT STATIONERS INCo 6480 BUNOSCHUH, NICMELLE tOOl 8URTRONICS 6SOZ CAPSTONE PICTURES 3305 CARDE PACiFiC CORPORATION 64bl CARDERASe CATHERINE 6482 CASTROe OELZA 68 CENTRAL CITZE~ SZGN SERvZCE 6483 CHEVRON llll2 713 CHICK°S SPORTING GOODS INC 6503 CHOPURZAN, HAGOP N. 6414 CHUANGe STEVE 73 CITRUS NOTORS ONTARIO, ZNC. 74 CiTY RENTALS 6505 COBOl, STEVEN W. 2362 CON SEN COnPINY, iNCH 6485 COMMUNICATION BRIEFINGS 40ZZ COMPETROL NFGe, ZNCe 2692 CONFUSERYE, INCORPORATEO 130 COMPUTER SERVICE CO 6A3 CONPUTERLAND 6486 COOK, JAQUELINE 2,283°63 13050 8o91 755o51 Z3o70 1,133o51 5,000000 540.91 1,454050 978.42 1,551.60 29.50 225°00 28005 557050 21o52 175000 94°34 56.00 18000 32.00 281.59 46051 Z6.45 20.70 3ZoOO 2,471066 107086 88089 ZO.OO 59.00 231o65 134.06 5.28 84,65 69°00 ltZ,5O 31.06 10506.74 60216010 46.00 1 1 t 1 1 I1 I 1 il · 1 11 ,I CITY OF RANCNO CUCANONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 00-10-96 (96/95) RUN DATE: 08/11/94 PAGE: Z VENDOR HARE ITEM OESCRZPTION HARR NO eARRe ANTe 6687 CORDOVA, OANIEL 6507 CORDOVA, DAVID 6506 COSANELLA, JULZE 6488 CRISANTI, CHERYL 6489 CRUTCHFIELD, KATHY 85 CUCAMONGA CO HATER DXST 239 D & K CONCRETE CO 6491 OAHN, BRIAR 264 DAISY NHEEL RIllON CO, ZNC 6690 DALLAS, MARY 6492 DALLAS, HZCHELLE 355 OANIELS TIRE SERVICE 2478 DAPPER TIRE 1291 DATAVAULT - U.S. SAFE DEPOSIT CO. 6510 DE HAAN, MELZSSA 6493 DELGADO, PHILIP 6494 DELGADO, VINCENT 9OZ DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION 107 DETCO 6695 OIAZ, PAHELA 6496 DXAZ, VERA 6497 DIRECT PURCHASE/DIVXOENO 3484 DOC JOE'S 3875 DUNN-EDMARO$ CORPORATION S23 EASTMAN, ZNC 2622 ELECTRONICS MAREHOUSE )616 ELITE TONING RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND ((( MONTHLY MATER BILLINGS STREET NA/NTENANCE RECREATION REFUND OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE NAXNTENANCE& SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES DATA STORAGE RESERVATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND TRAFFIC SIGNAL HAZNTENANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND 8USZNES$ LICENSE REFUND MAINTENANCE REPAIRS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES TONING SERVICE 8026 FIRST INTERSTATE lANK OF CALIFORNIA HSTR PLN STORM ORAZN REIN8 RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUBSCRIPTION MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUNO INSTRUCTOR PNT DEFERREO COHP NONTHL/TELEPHONE BILLINGS 6698 FOGARTY, KAREN 2660 FORD OF UPLAND, INC. 6699 FORTUNE 3967 FOURTH STREET ROCK 1082 FRANKLIN QUEST 6500 GANNON, LIANA 6501 GERCZCHe CATHERINE 6014 GRANTe RXTA 746 GREAT MESTER~ SAVINGS 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 12708 H.N.J.OESIGNS FOR AGRI BUSINESS ZNC BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND SUB-CONHITTEE REETZNG$ BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND 1996 CNEV ASTRO CARGO VAN RECREATION REFUND I2704 HANDLE MXTH CARE PACKAGING STORE 12730 HAMLONe KRXSTINE 127ZT HAROe TXNA W. 12719 HART, SUE 12TO7 HAVEN PARK DELZ 2855 HAVEN MINE L LIQUOR COe 12711 HAZANA CORP. 462 MCS-CUTLER STEEL 127Z6 HERSHNANe MARY 6305 HIIIARO CHEVROLET INC. 12720 HILL, TERESA :p3e CNECKt OVERLAP 89080 55.00 89081 65.00 89082 7e10 89083 3O.OO 89084. 29050 89085- 89085 t 89086 8e653.66 8 89087 17T.62 89088 29.50 89089 89090 16.00 89091 16.00 8 89092 661.4.2 89093 249e66 89094 194.50 89095 ITO.O0 I 89096 60.00 t 89097 TO.OO t 89098 11,271.65 I 89099 28.02 89100 29.50 89101 29.50 89102 8.99 89103 222.S0 I 69104. 762,99 I 89105 868.52 89106 89107 325.50 89108 4,881.62 89109 TB.O0 89110 TOeOZ 89111 56.96 · egll2 898.61 89113 17.45 89114 12,S0 89115 4.50 89116 lZS.O0 8911T 5,409.00 · 89118 882.T0 89119 49.74 891Z0 21.00 89 121 29.50 89122 59.00 89123 59.00 89124 16.59 8 89125 33849 89126 46e45 8 89127 215065 69128 59.00 89129 17,805.69 89130 29.S0 ! ! ! ! I ! I I I I I CiTY OF RANCMO CU~mdONGA LiST OF MARRANTS FOR PERiODS 08-10-94 C94/953 RUN DATE: 08/lZ/94 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NARE iTEM DESCRiPTiON NARR NO NARR. ANT. I2TZi HOEBERSe MARY ANN 1Z7X7 HOLCOMBe DIANNE 4250 HOLIDAY PRINTING 1234 HOSEMAN 16I MOYT LUMBER CO,e 1942 HVDRO TEK SYSTEMS, ZNCo 495 NYORO-SCAPE PROOUCTS, IQ) I C M A RETIRERENT TRUST-457 46 iNDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 3885 INLAND LANNMONER 122 iNLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN 12725 JABERie LORRAINE 6IZ JAESCHKE XNCo, IZT26 JONES, TONYA 12729 KAPADZA, PRERNA 12718 KEENE, NARILYN 1218 KNOX 12716 KORST, ELIZAeETH 12703 LANCE COMMUNICATIONS 321 LANDSCAPE NEST I2713 LEAGUE OF CALIF.CITIES IZ714 LEAGUE OF CALIF.CITIES 4t76 LONCAR, PHIL ZOO LOS ANGELES TIRES 12732 RANSOORZe ADOUL 549 NARZPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENT.ZNC. 72 HARK CMRZS, INC. 16 MARKMANeARCZYNSKI,HANSONeC KiNG 450 HARSHALL t RCKNZGHT TONING,INC. t2726 MARTZNEZe GZNA 3907 MASTER-SORT, INC. 2102 MCCALLe JEFF 12705 MEL TINKER TRUCK REPAIR 602 NEVER,.PAT 749 MZJAC ALARM COMPANY 12710 MISSION MILLS MORTGAGE CORP. IZTIS MORTGAGE PLACER THE 842 MOUNTAIN VXEe SHALL END, REPAIR 12706 fire C'S PZZZA 3978 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, ZNCe 12122 MYERS, RICHARD g MARY 4287 NAXSH, PAT 3693 NATIONHIDE MOBILE HOME 3&O0. NIELSENe NETTIE 12712 NIGHTINGALE CONANT 12723 NOLAN-MAYe KERRY 232 OHNITRANS IZ24 ORANGE COUNTY STRIPING SVCe INCo 12731 ORTA, AoJ./KELLY 563 OSTERBAUER COMPRESSOR SERVICE 12709 OVERHEAD DOOR CORP, ape CHECKI OVERLAP RECREATION REFUND PLAYCAMP REFUND PRINTING OF THE GRAPEVINE MAINTEkANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES DEFERRED CONP MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE ADVERTISING RECREATION REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNO BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNO LANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE REGISTRATION HOTEL RESERVATION C.EeRoT. INSTRUCTOR SUBSCRIPTION RECREATION REFUND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TONING SERVICES RECREATION REFUNO PRESORT MAIL SERVICES INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND REIMBURSEMENT FOR SUPPLIES ALARM SERVICES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND ARBITRAGE REBATE SERVICES RECREATION REFUND ENTERTAINMENT REHA6, PROGRAM NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND BUS PASSES STRiPiNG SERVICES RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND 89131 59.00 89132 30.00 89133 623,46 89134 41.24 89135 38.08 69i36 463,73 89137 285.68 69138 1t258.00 89139 178.21 89i40 696,22 89141 78210.53 89142 59.00 89143 288.31 69144 47.20 89145 29.50 89146 5.00 89147 401.27 69148 30,00 89149 ISoZI 89150 74t529.,57 89151 195.00 89152 ZOOBOO 69153 lZS.OO 89154 78.40 89155 2lO.OO 89156 340081.07 8~157 52.06 89158 ZlelSZeZ5 69159 4S.OO 89160 26o00 89161 129.43 89162 40152.00 89163 58037 89166 999,,80 89165 426.00 89166 190.OZ 89167 37.50 89168 9SS,BZ 89169 17.23 89170 leSIOeS9 89171 59.00 69172 350.00 89173 496.30 89176 SO.OO 89175 44.71 89176 SB,OO 89177 168.S0 89178 3e514.61 89179 20,,00 B9180 167.88 89181 65.61 CiTY OF RANCNQ CUCAHONGA LiST OF NANRANTS FOR PERiODs 0B-10-94 (94/95) RUN DATES 081i1194 PAGES VENDOR NAME iTEM DESCRiPTiON NARR NO MANN. ANTe 8005 P C NORLD LOTUS EDiTiON 1823 PAGENET 8000 PAINTER, JOHN 80Oi PASHA, OOeA 757 PEP BOYS Z079 PHOTO HOUSE OF CALiFORNia 8006 PHOTOGRAPHY 8Y HELEN VENTURA 3iS PICONE PLUMBING CORPORATION 255 POMA DiSTRiBUTiNG CO 28i2 POHONA FENCE COMPANY 8003 POSTAL ANNEX · 8002 PHiORE, JACKZE 583 PROTECTION SERVICES, into 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY SUBSCRiPTiON PAGING SERVICE RECREATZON REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES PHOTO SUPPLIES PHOTO SERVICE & SUPPLIES PLUMBING REPAIR & SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE g SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLiES-FENCES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNOS PROTECTION SERViCES-LiONS CNTR MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 80O& PSYCHOLOGICAL HEALTH RESOURCES, INC BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS ZSZ R & R AUTOMOTIVE 33~4 R G CONSTRUCTION 3031 RANCHO CUCAHONGA ROTARY CLUB 4130 RBH LOCK L KEY SERVICE 1i65 RTCHAROSON AUTO BODY, ZNCe 8007 ROBERTSON, JULXE 6008 HOGHAiR, OZANNE 8009 ROJO, GENEVIEVE 8010 ROULE, JEFFLSMELLY 2196 RUGG LUMBER COMPANY, iNC. &O&7 S & M PLASTICS ZQ8& SAFECQ LiFE iNS. CO. GROUP AOMIN. 8OSi SAFLEY, TiN ' 8OSZ 5ALCZOO, BRENOA 301 SAN BERN CO SHERIFFS i)Z SAN DIEGO ROTARY BROOM COt 8013 SANTA MARia, VANESSA 8014 SANTOSt ARLOU 3313 SARTOR'S MOBILE MORE, PETE lOSS SEALS, MARIANNE 8016 SECURITY MANAGEMENT CO S35 $EMPLE, JUDY 1327 SMART ~ FINAL 80Z7 SMITH, LUZS 319 SO CALXF GAS CO. S&)2 SOUTHERN CALiFORNia EDISON Z837 STRATTON, HARK BOSe SUVAL, ALLAN 3T33 TOM NORLO CONVERSIONS, LTD. 8019 TiPPiNGS, HICHELLE 19?4 TRAFFIC SPECiALTiES 1927 TRAMHELL, ROBERT L. 4067 TUCKER, THOMAS E. g JOYCE A, 350 U-S. POSTMASTER 2958 UM~' ARE US ASSOCiATiON VEHICLE HAZNTBSUPPLXES&SERVZCE REHAB PROGRAM ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE MAINTENANCE RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS MAZNT SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MEOZCAL iNSURANCE RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS CONTRACT SHERIFFS SERVICE NAZNT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS REHA8 PROGRAM RECREATZO REFUNOS BUSINESS REFUNDS iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT DAY CAMP SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS HONTHLY GAS BILLS MONTHLY ELECTRIC BILLS MILEAGE REZHDURSENENT RECREATION REFUNDS VEHICLE MAZNT SUPPLiES/SERViCE RECREATION REFUNOS TRAFFIC SUPPLIES COHPUTER CABLE REPAIR DEPOSIT REPUNO POSTAGE LANDSCAPE HENSLETTER udp SERVICES 8, CHECKI OVERLAP 89i8Z 17.97 89183 34.20 89184 29.50 89185 SBoOO 89186 41s27 89187 6.55 89188 34°48 89 189 196.2 T I 89190 9',384oS7 I 89191 1,250023 89192 8086 89193 29.50 e 89194 10176.34 t 89195 89196 23.00 I 89197 2,602.83 89198 112.50 89199 150.00 I 89200 25.86 89201 394.61 89202 30.00 89203 29.50 89204 104o00 89205 59.00 89206 61.09 · 89207 64.86 89208 62,97 89209 18,OO 89210 ZBeSO · 89211 632,370000 89212 ~56.86 89213 16.00 8921~ 30.00 89215 2,590.00 89216 29.50 89217 S9.20 89218 174.00 I 89219 113,57 89220 59.00 I 89221 643.06 89222 - 69227 I 89228 15,782057 89229 16o24 69230 20000 89231 SiS.Z6 89232 29.50 89233 126.07 89234 36.40 I 8923S lZ,OO4.lO 89236 IS.O0 I 89237 4,097.50 CITY OF RANClIO C~ .ONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: 08-10-.94 (94/95) RUN DATEi 08/Zt/94 PAGE: S VENOOR NANE ZTEM DESCRIPTION WARR NO MARRo ART, 3A22 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS 1103 VISTA PAINT 8020 VOLUNTEER CENTER 8020 VOLUNTEER CENTER 678 WARREN & CO.t CARL 213 WAXZE, KLEEN-LZNE CORP 267 WESTERN ROCK CO 758 WITS 8021 WREN, TRACEY 675 WYNNeS FROSTENPlliAXAZR 509 XEROX CDRPDRATZON 371 LEE REDZCAL SERVICE 8OZZ ZENANe LORZ 8023 ZOLA-WRZGliTe BARBARA OFFICE SUPPLIES HAINT SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS LIABILITY CLAZNS NAZNT SUPPLIES ASPliALT g CONCRETE RECREACTZON SUPPLIES RECREATZO REFUNDS VEHICLE liAZNT SUPPLIES COPY HACHINE SUPPLIESISERVZCE RECREATION SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS OVERLAP 89238 106.95 89239 20°80 89240 ZO.OO 89241 ZO.O0 89242 983.89 89243 285.30 89244 STOoO0 89245 94.19 89246 35.00 89247 23°36 89248 3eZ06.73 89249 49.94 89250 59.00 8925Z 29.50 TOTAL 914e185.92 · 1 I I '~1 I I I I 1 I t CITY OF RANCHQ CUCANONGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERIOD: OR-IT-94 C94/553 RUN OATEz 08/I7/94 PAGE: VENOOR NAME ITEM DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR. ANT. 6000 4252 J.E.Go CONSTRUCTION, ZNCo 749 NIJAC ALARM CONPANY 6067 TUCKER, THOMAS E,, i JOYCE A,, 6067 TUCKER, THOMAS 4067 TUCKER, THOMAS Eo 1135 ALIGNMENT i BRAKE SPECIALISTS 6512 AQUATENP, ZNC. 26 ARBOR NURSERY INCo 2616 AUTO PARTS CONPANT, INC e41 BANK OF AMERICA-CORPORATE B41 BANK OF AMERICA-CORPORATE 6511 BASUA, VERONICA 6513 BEAUOMONT, LISA 67 BELL L HONELL 6514 BONNAN, KXM 3Z18 CHINO HILLS TRANSMISSION 73 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO, ZNC, 12748 COLEMAN, ANNA 6515 CUTTER, MARY JANE 6516 DEAMOS, NICK 6517 DOMXNGUEZ, iRACELl 6518 ORESSELHAUSe MRSe 6519 DURZNGt CAROL 3604 ECOFF, JILL 6S20 ERMAN, GLORIA 6521 FARRe BONNXE 3982 FIRST IMPRESSIONS 6522 GIBSON, KATHLEEN 6523 GZLLZAN, RACHEL 6524 GILLZLANO, BdITTANY 2155 GXULEA, VASZLE 6525 GOLDBERG, ELIZABETH 3388 GOLDEN BEAR ARBORISTS, %NCe 6526 GONEZt STEVE 93 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A$S0 6527 GREANEY, LXNOA 6528 GREGORY, KAREN 137 GTE CALIFORNIA 12740 MANLON, KRISTZNE 1Z744 HARDYMAN, CARRIE/BRIAN 462 HCS-CUTLEI STEEL CO, 22739 HENMERRY, SUSAN 1149 HILL BROTHERS CHEMICAL COMPANY 2255 ~OLT'S AUTO ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP PROGRESS PAYMENT ALARM SERVICES DEPOSIT REFUND DEPOSIT REFUND DEPOSIT REFUND VEHICLE MAINTENANCE BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS MAINTEkANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION FEES ADMINISTRATION FEES RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNOS PROFESSIONAL SERVICE RECREATION REFUNDS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE/SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS EMPLOYEE/CONMUTER OF THE MONTH RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNOS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS CASH AOVANCE RECREATION REFUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RECREATION REFUNDS MEMBERSHIP OUES RECREATION REFUNOS RECREATION REFUNDS MONTHLY TELEPHONE BILLINGS RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCe RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES ** CHECKt OVERLAP 880155 40.00- 81016- 89034 ))) 890358 66,044026 89036- 89164 I 89165 426.00- 89166- 89234 I 89235 12,004.10- 89236- 89Z51 89252, z ,627.21 89253, 10,376.89 89254- 89255 89256 968008 89257 71.66 89258 161o63 · 89259 213.29 e 89z60 905,540.00 e 89261 504,640,.00 89262 16.00 89263 29.50 89264 3e690000 89265 15.00 89266 1,772.32 8 89261 239,03 89268 36.08 89Z69 19.00 89270 35.B0 89271 IS.SO 89272 95.00 89273 59.00 89274- 89214 ))) m 09275 503,31 89276 19.00 89277 19.OO 89278 1,236.97 89279 19.00 89280 16.00 89281 22,50 · 89282 132.73 89283 29.50 89284 19,709.00 89285 60.00 89286 38.79 P9297 19.50 89288 59.00 I 89289 8,936.37 89290 29.50 89291 Z5.OO f 89191 44.36 89293 3S,OO 89294 37.61 I 19295 331070 CITY OF RANCHD CUCAHQNGA LIST OF NARRANTS FOR PERIOD1 00-i7-94 C94/933 RUN DATE: 08/17/94 PAGE: 2 VENDOR NAHE ITEM DESCRIPTION UARR NQ WARn. AHT. 2234 HOSEMAN 3436 HUNT, LUANNE 493 HYDRO-SCAPE PRQDUCTS~ 6161 Z.B. LZTNQ 2927 Z.C.B.O. - FOOTHILL CHAPTER 46 INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 612 JAESCHKE ZNC., C.R. 12742 KZNGw $NERRZ IZ18 KNOX 12Y43 KONKEL, SHARON 4242 LAIDLAW TRANSIT 1Z745 LANGLOXS, DiCK 12733 LAURENT, MZCHELLE 849 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 1274i LEON, PATRZCZA 1274T LINt BRIAR 12136 LONGO, BETTY 3136 LU'S LXGNTHOUSEw iNC, IZ737 NALDONADOw LESLIE iZT)S MARXNELLie OLGA S49 NARZPOSA HORTICULTURAL ENTeZNC. 76 HARKHANeARCZYNSKIeHANSONe& KiNG 3800 HASTERS, TXNOTHY 1Z149 HAY, LESLIE 12734 MERCY AMBULANCE SERVICE, INC. 4Z04 HOORE nEC. & PARK EQUIPHENT~ INC. 12T38 NORRISON, ROBIN 12746 HOSLEYt PHiL 2Z40 NAPA AUTO PARTS 3693 NATIONHIDE HOBZLE HOME 6034 NXCHOLSt FRED 118 PARAGON 8UZLOZNG PRODUCTS inC. 8OZY PARK, SONG 8028 PATRZCKe HOLLY 417 PATTON SALES CORPo 8029 PETERSe KATHY 253 PONA DiSTRIBUtING CO 8030 PRESTIGE COMPANY, THE 8031 PRICE COSTCO 4265 PRXHE EQUZPNENT 6302 PROFESSIONAL EQUIPRENT 65 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 8032 PUL/CEe NANCY 351Z Q SAFETY 1890 R C R LIGHTING 80Z4 RAINBOW iNDUSTRIES 8033 RANOEw FRANCES 2257 RAUL'S AUTO TRZN, 4130 RBN LOCK t KEY SERVICE 2201 leOHOMO, MIKE 8034 RF"~RD$ON, JULZE ,8 CHECKI OVERLAP MAINTENANCE $UPPLXE$ INSTRUCTOR PNT LANOSCAPE MAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION SUPPLIES HEHBERSHZP FEES HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES VEHICLE HAZNTENANCE RECREATION REFUND MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND TRANSPORTATION SERVICES RECREATION REFUND BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND HAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND OiL ANALYSIS RECREATION REFUND RECREATION REFUND LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES D.A.R.Eo HEETZNG REFUND SOLrANG TRIP BUSINESS LICENSE REFUND HAXNTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUND REZHBURSEHENT iCBO CERTIFICATE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE REHA8. PROGRAM iNSTRUCTOR PATNENT CONCRETE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS VEHICLE MAINTENANCE £ SUPPLIES BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS BUSINESS LICENSE REFUNDS MAINTENANCE EQUIPHENT BUILDING&SAFETY SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS COMPUTER SUPPLIES MAINTENANCE SERVICE/SUPPLIES CORNUNITY SERVICES SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS VEHICLE REPAIRS MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES iNSTRUCTOR PAYMENT RECREATION REFUNDS 89296 502.37 89297 IS3.00 89298 23.54 89299 IsSIT.IZ 89300 25000 89301 666.40 89302 309.16 89303 29.50 89304 609.39 89305 ZB.SO 89306 295.97 69307 35.00 89308 5.40 89309 i.116041 89310 IT.TO 89311 18.00 89312 19.00 89313 450.00 89314 41.75 89315 19.00 89316 11,832,,01 89317 Z,16O.O0 89318 84.10 89319 23.50 89320 31,04 89321 2,123.81 89322 30,00 89)23 45.00 89)24 923.36 69325 362.00 89326 l,O08.0O 19)27 14.01 89328 29.50 89329 19.00 89330 141.00 89331 19.00 89332 6,258o66 89333 101.12 89334 171.75 89335 7.177.14 89336 145.20 89337 12.2T 89338 19.00 89339 49.69 89340 152.87 89341 3T.SO 89~2 19.00 89363 138.88 8934,4 53.93 89343 158.40 893~6 25.00 CITY OF RANCHO CUCANQNGA LIST OF MARRANTS FOR PERZOO3 08-17-96 (96/95) RUN DATE: 08/iT/96 PAGE: 3 VENDOR NAME ZTEN DESCRIPTION NARR NO NARR, ANT. 8069 RISTERs COLETTA JUNE 6Z6 ROBLES, RAUL P,, 8035 RQHAN, YSENIA 8036 ROSENTHAL, CAROL 8037 RUSSELL, HEATHER 3958 SALVIATit HARTHA 581 SAN 6ERNAROZNO COUNTY 8038 $ANAeRZA, $HELLY 8039 $CHAERRER, SEAN 8060 SCHAERRER, STEPHANZE 8041 SCHEURICHe ANNALEZSE 6128 $CHRARZE iNDUSTRIES, INC. 1327 SMART L FINAL 163Z SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 8050 STATE NET 8062 STERN, ANNE 8043 STONE, MICKZ 390 STRESS CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC, Z366 TARGET 8066 TAULHAN, DONALD 005Z TROTTER, AORIANNE 693 U.S.INHZTE VAN BATTERY CO., iNC. 2958 UNPS ARE US ASSOCiATiON ZZZ6 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE )it4 URISA 2ZiO VARNEY, GARY 8065 ViCTORiA CONMUNITT CHURCH 667 VISA t103 VISTA PAINT 2340 VORTEX iNDUSTRiES 8054 NALSH, LARRY 1052 NATTt PATRICK 213 NAXZEe.KLEEN-LZNE CORP 8066 MEAVER, LOUISE 6306 NEZLDRECHT CO~M,w INCe 6311 NE$TERN ENPIRE 365 NHITNEY MACHINERY 8047 HIKER JUDY 805) UZNOONS MAGAZINE 758 HiTS 675 VTNNeS F'ROSTEHP/HAXAZR 509 XEROX CORPORATION 8068 YENOVKZAN, ELAINE/JQNATHON 348 lEP HANUFACTURING CONPANT RECREATION REFUNDS TIRE REPAIR RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS iNSTRUCTOR PAYNENT CAL-XD PROGRAM RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS VEHICLE SUPPLIES DAY CAMP SUPPLIES MONTHLY ELECTRIC DILLS MEMBERSHIP RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS EAP DEPOSIT YOUTH PROGRAM & DAY CAMP $UPPL RECREATION REFUNDS RECREATION REFUNDS VEHICLE NAZNTENANCE SUPPLIES UMP SERVICES UPS SERVICE NENOERSHZP HINI EQUIPNENT MEETING RECREATION REFUNDS VISA MONTHLY BiLLiNGS NAZNT SUPPLIES HAZNT SERVICE & REPAIRS RECREATION REFUNDS CLAZN SETTLEMENT NAINT SUPPLIES RECREATIN REFUNDS COMPUTER PRINT FEATURE TERMITE FUMIGATION MAXNT SUPPLIES RECREATION REFUNDS SUBSCRIPTION RECREACTION SUPPLIES VEHICLE HAINT SUPPLIES COPY MACHINE SUPPLIES/SERViCE RECREATZN REFUNDS VEHICLE RAINY SUPPLIES ** CHECK8 OVERLAP 893~7 41000 89348 60.50 893~9 29.50 89350 15.00 89351 Z2.SO 89352 60.00 I 89353 1,323.30 89356 29.50 89355 30.00 89356 30.00 89357 19.00 89358 79.17 II 89359 130.69 89360- 89362 I 89363 42e010.56 89366 1,470.00 89365 19.00 89366 39.50 89367 S,O00.O0 I* 89368 541.87 89369 19.00 89 370 i6.OO I 8937i 346.96 89372 85.00 89373 10300°00 I 89374 280.00 69375 182.00 89376 336.38 I 89377 883.76 I 89378 152,36 89379 378.21 89380 27.50 8938i 160.00 89362 789.31 89383 19.00 89386 591.69 89385 875.00 89386 355.67 89387 19.00 09388 19o97 89389 78.43 89:390 166.80 89391 632.26 89392 25.00 89393 792.21 TOTAL 1,6149672.01 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION SLOPE AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED ON MILLIKEN AVENUE SOUTH OF JERSEY BOULEVARD AT THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY (SCRRA) RAILROAD CROSSING (FORMERLY A.T. & S.F. RAILWAY CO.) TO BE FUNDED FROM LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B, ACCOUNT NO. 46-4130-g324 RECOIIENDATION It is reconm~ended that the City Council approve plans and specifications for Milliken Avenue Grade Separation ~ope and Drainage Improvements and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City D erk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACK. GROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. The project includes construction of cutoff walls, catch basins, atrium drains, other miscellaneous drainage improvements and modification of landscaping improvements. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $135,000.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for Tuesday September 13, 1994, and Tuesday September 20, lgg4, with the Bid opening scheduled for Tuesday October 4, 1994, at 2:00 p.m. in the City Clerk's office. Respectfully submitted, . William J. O'Nl~~ City Engineer WJO:MDL:Ly Attachment y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION SLOPE AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamenga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamenga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Milliken Avenue Grade Separation Slope and Dra i nage Improvements" . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shal 1 be substantial ly in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of BID TIME on BID DAY AND DATE, sealed bids or proposals for the "PROJECT TITLE" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamenga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of PROJECT TI TL E." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in-the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and are available to any interested party 10 ~n request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day o~ portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship comnittee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the joint apprenticeship comittee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or journe~nnen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shal 1 comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any 11 subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the city of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "LICENSE" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions 'Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. ' The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications 'of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE) is non refundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor 's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 7th day of September 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the CouDcil of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, this 7th day of September 1994. MNXyor ATTEST: City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: September 13 and September 20, 1994 13 FOOTHII.L ( RT. -: 66) BOULEVARD ARROW --' ROUTE -- PROJECT -" LOCATION AT & SF ~,,R, IIII IIIIIllllllllllllllll IIIII111 II Z FOURTH ~ STREET > <I: III I IIIIIIll VICINITY MAP ~.T.~, DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Li nd8 Beek, Jr. Engi neer~ AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BID~' FOR THE SALINA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CALAVERAS AVENUE AND SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND VINMAR AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO 350 FEET NORTH OF SALINA AVENUE TO BE FUNDED FROM CDBG FUNDS, ACCOUNT NO. 28-4333-9318 REC(NqEIIDATIOM: It is recomnended that City Council approve plans and specifications for the Salina Avenue Street Improvements: Salina Avenue Street Improvements Between Calaveras Avenue and Sierra Hadre Avenue and Vinmar Avenue Street Improvements to 350 feet north of Salina Avenue and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACKGROUND/ANALY SIS The subject project plans and specifications have been completed by staff and approved by the City Engineer. This project will include the construction of street improvements, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. The Engineer's estimate for construction is $154,797.00. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 16, 1994, and September 23, 1994, with the bid opening at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday, October 4, 1994. Respectful ly submitted, William J. 0'~ City Engineer WjO:LB:ly L cc: Purchasing Attachment Y A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SALINA AVNUE SLEET IMPROVEMENTS: SALINA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CALAVERAS AVENUE AND SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND VI NHAR AVENUE SLEET IMPROVEMENTS TO 350 FEET NORTH OF SALINA AVENUE ,IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared plans and specifications for the construction of certain improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamenga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for the "Salina Avenue Street Improvements". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposals for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on TUESDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1994, sealed bids or proposals for the "SALINA AVENUE SLEET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CALAVERA$ AVENUE AND SIERRA HADRE AVENUE AND VINMAR AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS TO 350 FEET NORTH OF SALINA AVENUE" in said City. A prebid meeting is scheduled for 2:00 P.M. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 1994, at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Engineering Division. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, irked, "Bid for Construction of SALINA AVENUE SLEET IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN CALAVERAS AVENUE AND SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND VINHAR AVENUE STREET IHPROVEMENTS TO 350 FEET NORTH OF SALINA AVENUE2' MINIMUM WAGE RATE: Notice is hereby given that this project is funded with U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development funds and that the rate of wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic employed under this contract shall be not less than as specified under the U.S. Department of Labor General Wage Decision in the locality in which the work is to be performed as modified within 16 .ten (10) days prior to the bid opening date as required under the Davis-Bacon Act. Notwithstanding the conditions hereinabove, the California Labor Code stipulates that not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the contract in the locality in which the work is to be performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work as determined by the Director o.f Industrial Relations of the State of California shall be paid to all workmen employed. Where a discrepancy exists between the federal and state prevailing wage rates, the policy of the California Department of Labor is to require that the higher of the two prevailing wage rates shall apply. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not mere than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if. such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevailing rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any sub- contractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor empploying tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the joint apprenticeship conmtttee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to Journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: A. When unemploJnnent in the area of coverage by the Joint apprenticeship comnittee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or B. When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or C. When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or locally, or D When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenticable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shal 1 ' comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. · Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day 's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the city of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dollars ($25.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10% of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of failure to enter into such contract said cash, cashter's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. BONDS: The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shal 1 be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will also be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. AFFIRNATIVE ACTION: The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that in any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, minority business enterprise will be afforded full opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation 'and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, sex, or-national origin, in consideration for the award. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class .as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Business and Professions Code", Section 7028.13, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon application to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY FIVE) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mailing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any or all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 7TH day of SEPTEMBER 1994. ATTEST: Dennis L. Stout, Hayor Debra J. Adams, City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: SEPTEMBER 16 AND SEPTEMBER 23, 1994 ARROW HWY. "~ 9 TH STREET · ka ll. r, AND 8 TH STREET SALINA AVENUE STREET I1VIPROVE1VrF~NTS BETWEEN CAT,&VERAS AVENUE AND SIERRA MADRE AVENUE AND VIN'MAR AVENUE STREET IMPROVENrF,,NTS TO 350 FEET NORTH OF SALINA AVENUE DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Hembets of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda Beek, Jr. Engineer AUTHORIZE THE ADVERTISING OF THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" FOR THE 1994/95 FY STREET REHABILITATION PROGRA~ AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, WHICH INCLUDES CAPE SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL, TO BE FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT NO. 01-4640-9400 RECOIIENDATION: It is recon~nended that City Council approve plans and specifications ~or the 1994/95 FY Street Rehabil iraLion Program at Various Locations, which includes Cape Seal and Slurry Seal, and approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Clerk to advertise the "Notice Inviting Bids". BACK G ROUND/ ANALY S I S The subject project plans and specifications have been conmleted by staff and approved by the City Engineer. With the City's recently completed Pavement Management Study (PMS) Program in a fully con~uterized mode, the City can easily budget funds for streets in need of maintenance. Based on the success of the recen~y completed first project of the Pavement Rehabilitation Program, funds have been budgeted for FY 94-95 to continue the street rehabilitation program. The Engineer's estimate for the next phase is $750,000.00. which covers approximately 40 linear miles. A map has been attached showing the recently completed areas and the newly proposed areas based on the PMS Program. Legal advertising is scheduled for September 13, 1994, and September 20, 1994, with the bid opening at 2:00 PM on Tuesday, Septenfoer 27, 1994. Respectfully ~ Will lam J. O' City Engineer WJO:LB:sd Attachment L A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 94/95 FY STREET REHABILITATION PROGRAH AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, WHICH INCLUDES CAPE SEAL AND SLURRY SEAL, IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. plans and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "1994/95 FY Street Rehabilitation Program at Various Locations, which includes Cape Seal and ~ urry Seal". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposal s for doing the work speci fled in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 Pr4 on Tuesday, September 27, 1994, sealed bids or proposals for the "1994/95 FY Street Rehabilitation Program at Various Locations, which includes Cape Seal and Slurry Seal" in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Californta 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of 1994/95 FY Street Rehabilitation Program at Various Locations, which includes Cape Seal and S1 urry Seal ." PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevailing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10500 Civic Center 1 Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, Cal fornia, and are available to any interested party on request. The Contracting Agency also shall cause a copy of such determinations to be posted at the job site. Pursuant to provisions of Labor Code Section 1775, the Contractor shall forfeit, as penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, not more than fifty dollars ($50.00) for each laborer, workman, or mechanic employed for each calendar day or portion thereof, if such laborer, workman or mechanic is paid less than the general prevail tng rate of wages hereinbefore stipulated for any work done under the attached contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of said Labor Code. Attention is directed to the provisions in Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 of the Labor Code concerning the employment of apprentices by the Contractor or any subcontractor under him. Section 1777.5, as amended, requires the Contractor or subcontractor employing tradesmen in any apprenticable occupation to apply to the Joint apprenticeship conmntttee nearest the site of the public works project and which administers the apprenticeship program in that trade for a certificate of approval. The certificate will also fix the ratio of apprentices to journeymen that will be used in the performance of the contract. The ratio of apprentices to journeymen in such cases shall not be less than one to five except: When unemployment in the area of coverage by the .Joint apprenticeship conmnittee has exceeded an average of 15 percent in the 90 days prior to the request of certificate, or When the number of apprentices in training in the area exceeds a ratio of one to five, or When the trade can show that it is replacing at least 1/30 of its membership through apprenticeship training on an annual basis statewide or 1 ocal 1 y, or When the Contractor provides evidence that he employs registered apprentices on all of his contracts on an annual average of not less than one apprentice to eight Journeymen. The Contractor is required to make contributions to funds established for the administration of apprenticeship programs if he employs registered apprentices or Journeymen in any apprenttcable trade on such contracts and if other Contractors on the public works site are making such contributions. The Contractor and subcontractor under him shall comply with the requirements of Sections 1777.5 and 1777.6 in the employment of apprentices. Information relative to apprenticeship standards, wage schedules, and other requirements may be obtained from the Director of Industrial relations, ex-officio the Administrator of Apprenticeship, San Francisco, California, or from the Division of apprenticeship Standards and its branch offices. Eight (8) hours of labor shall constitute a legal day's work for all workmen employed in the execution of this contract and the Contractor and any subcontractor under him shall comply with and be governed by the laws of the State of California having to do with working hours as set forth in Division 2, Part ~7, Chapter 1, Article 3 of the Labor Code of the State of California as amended. The Contractor shall forfeit, as a penalty to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, twenty-five dol 1 ars ( $25.00) for each 1 aborer, workman, or mechanic employed in the execution of the contract, by him or any subcontractor under him, upon any of the work hereinbefore mentioned, for each calendar day during which said laborer, workman, or mechanic is required or permitted to labor more than eight (8) hours in violation of said Labor Code. Contractor agrees to pay travel and subsistence pay to each workman needed to execute the work required by this contract as such travel and subsistence payments are defined in the applicable collective bargaining agreement filed in accordance with Labor Code Section 17773.8. The bidder must submit with his proposal, cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bidder's bond, payable to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for an amount equal to at least ten percent (10~ of the amount of said bid as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into the proposed contract if the same is awarded to him, and in event of fail ure to enter into such contract said cash, cashier's check, certified check, or bond shall become the property of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. If the City of Rancho Cucamonga awards the contract to the next lowest bidder, the amount of the lowest bidder's security shall be applied by the City of Rancho Cucamonga to the difference between the low bid and the second lowest bid, and the surplus, if any shall be returned to the lowest bidder. The amount of the bond to be given to secure a faithful performance of the contract for said work shall be one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price thereof, and an additional bond in an amount equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the contract price for said work shall be given to secure the payment of claims for any materials or supplies furnished for the performance of the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, or any work or labor of any kind done thereon, and the Contractor will al so be required to furnish a certificate that he carries compensation insurance covering his employees upon work to be done under contract which may be entered into between him and the said City of Rancho Cucamonga for the construction of said work. No proposal will be considered from a Contractor to whom a proposal form has not been issued by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Contractor shall possess any and all contractors licenses, in form and class as required by any and all applicable laws with respect to any. and all of the work to be performed under this contract; including-but not limited to a Class "A" License (General Engineering Contractor) or Class "C-17" in accordance with the provisions of the Contractor's License Law (California Business and Professions Code, Section 7000 et. seq.) and rules and regulation adopted pursuant thereto. The Contractor, pursuant to the "California Bustnes~ and Professions Code", Section 7028.15, shall indicate his or her State License Number on the bid, together with the expiration date, and be signed by the Contractor declaring, under penalty of perjury, that the information being provided is true and correct. The work is to be done in accordance with the profiles, plans, and specifications of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on file in the Office of the City Clerk at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Copies of the plans and specifications, available at the office of the City Engineer, will be furnished upon applicatton to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and payment of $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE), said $35.00 (THIRTY-FIVE) is nonrefundable. Upon written request by the bidder, copies of the plans and specifications will be mailed when said request is accompanied by payment stipulated above, together with an additional nonreimbursable payment of $15.00 (FIFTEEN DOLLARS) to cover the cost of mail ing charges and overhead. The successful bidder will be required to enter into a contract satisfactory to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. In accordance with the requirements of Section 9-3.2 of the General Provisions, as set forth in the Plans and Specifications regarding the work contracted to be done by the Contractor, the Contractor may, upon the Contractor's request and at the Contractor's sole cost and expense, substitute authorized securities in lieu of monies withheld (performance retention). The City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. Dated this 7th day of September 1994. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamenga, California, this 7th day of September 1994. ATTEST: City Clerk ADVERTISE ON: September 13 and September 20, 1994 DATE: TO:' FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Walter Sttckney, Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO APPROPRIATE $70,130 FROM FUND 24 - "ISTEA" (A/C 24- 4637-9112) AND $18,g00 FROM FUND 32 - "MEASURE I" (A/C 32-4637- 9112) FOR THE HAVEN AVENUE STREET IblPROVEMENTS BElWEEN CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; AND TO APPROPRIATE $61,660 FROM FUND 28 - "CDBG" (A/C 28-4333-9329) FOR THE VIN~AR AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS; AND TO APPROPRIATE $2,210.00 (A/C 28-4333- 9121) FOR THE NINTH STREET WATER LINE RECGleENDATION It is recommended that City Council approve an appropriation of $70,130 from Fund 24- "Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA)" (a/c 24- 4637-9112) and $18,900 from Fund 32 - "Measure I" (a/c 32-4637-9112) for the Haven Avenue street improvements between Civic Center Drive and Foothill Bou1 evard; and to appropriate $61,660 from Fund 28 - "CDBG" (a/c 28-4333-9329) for the Vinmar Avenue street improvements and $2,210.00 (a/c 2B-4333-9121) for the Ninth Street Water Line. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On August 3, 1994, City Council approved the continuation of appropriations for Purchase Orders for projects that are ongoing from FY 93/94 to FY 94/95. Omitted from that list were appropriations for three ongoing proZIects. Construction of Haven Avenue from Civic Center Drive to Foothill Boulevard is complete but final payment to the contractor must still be processed. The second project, Vtnmar Avenue improvements from Ninth Street to Charley Street alley, is under construction with completion scheduled before November. The third project, Ninth Street Water Line is complete, but final payment to the contractor must be processed. These appropriations will allow the re-issuance of the Purchase Orders for these three projects. These appropriations will not impact any other projects City Council previously approved in the FY 94/95 Budget. City Engineer WjO:WS:dlw Date: September 7, 1994 To: MAYOR AND MEMBERS JAdK LAM, CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MEMORANDUM OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY MANAGER A.I.C.P. From: BRUCE ZEINER, CHIEF OF POLICE RANCHO CUCAMONGA POLICE DEPARTMENT Subject: AUTOMATED PUBLIC INFORMATION / NOTIFICATION SYSTEM RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the expenditure of not more than $29,000 for equipment that includes items for the following areas: AUTOMATED PUBLIC INFORMATION / NOTIFICATION SYSTEM Automated Citizen Information System Funds in the asset seizure account are the result of legal proceedings against assets of narcotics offenders. There is currently $159,576.99 in this account as of July 1, 1994. Health and Safety Code 11489 describes use of these funds and places only two limits on how they can be spent: They must be used "exclusively to support the law enforcement... efforts of those agencies." The money "shah not supplant any state or local funds that would {otherwise} be made available" to the agency. The Rancho Cucamonga Police Department would like to purchase the following items utfiizing funds from the Asset Seizure Account. As per Section 11489 of the Health and Safety Code, these items will be used exclusively to support the law enforcement efforts of the department. These expenditures are not supplanting any city funds that would otherwise be made available. Page 2 of 2 pages Asset Seizure Expenditure Request September 7, 1994 . BACKGROUND: With the current size of the city of Rancho Cucamonga and the public demand for information. It is recommended that an Automated Citizen Information System (ACIS) be purchased to better serve the needs of the community. The ACIS will give the public easy access to a 24-hour a day, 7 days a week information source. It will have the capability to provide information on Crime Prevention techniques, Resource Identification and ~ :: :~n added benefit the system will also accommodate information on city activity and procedures. The ACIS system could be used as a single source for information throughout the city. The ACIS also has the ability to take messages that could be used by city departments and anonymous tips that can be used by the Police Department for Solution Oriented Policing in the city. Community surveys on crime issues etc. can be done using this system. The ACIS will let the Police Department make outgoing announcements to predesignated phones. This will allow rapid notification of Neighborhood Watch, Business Watch, Citizen Patrol, and others of important crime trends or special events.. This system will augment information services of Police and City Personnel and is not intended to replace personal contact. The choice of this type of system is based upon studies performed by other cities which included Computer Bulletin Boards, Kiosks, and the ACIS. The ACIS is more popular with the citizens of the communities with a 15 to i margin against Computer BBS and 37 to I with Kiosks. The apparent wide margin can be attributed to the fact that nearly everyone has a telephone and not a computer. BZ:dw INCORPOI=L~TED P.O. BOX 663 BMCKSB(JRI3, VII August 8, 1994 Ms Joan Kmse · Purchasing Agent , CJty of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucarnonga Ca 91729 System. The system will have the following appllcaflcns: Per your request ! am sending you a pdce quote with discounts for a 1Z port Tele-Works Information ' Automated C~tlz. ens lnformatton System Police N.AN appflcetlon So.r'tware ' Software 4 port FaxBack. and Board The system will come with..*h.-_ fo!l---'.',4n; z.s part of .~':~rn.. price: [ j 486 Computer, monitor, =pson printer, 400 Scriptware t,=~npiatcs, 300 recorcfings brochure camera ready template, marketing education, Tele-Works V 3, l Voice So;.ftwate 1Z line ACIS $ 25,950.00 4 port fax $ 5,995.00' Police N/W $ 1,875.00 ·' . Discount (Southem Calf)* · $ 33,8zo.oo, $ 8,500.00 · The $ 8,500,00 discount has been Fen with the understandinS that the ON ofeancho CucamonS~.. :';' -' ...~: ' i-lellz)iFtg "Better lfH'orrn atlcl l:~etter L-~,<.;r've" yC~Ltr coillnlunlty. f DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer John L. Martin, Associate Engineer APPROVAL TO RELEASE REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT FOR 9760 LEMON AVENUE, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LEMON AVENUE, WEST OF LONDON AVENUE, REQUESTED BY RAY A. AND NANCY JONES (APN 201-251-B5) PI~DMIO~ It is recommended that the Council adopt the attached Resolution releasing the Real Property 'Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor to sign said release and the City Clerk to record same. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS A Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement was approved by City Council on April 3, 1986, and recorded on April 25, 1986, as Document No. 86- 108006, in the Office of the County Recorder, San Bernardino County, California. The Agreement was for the installation of certain public improvements including, but not limited to curbs, gutters, drive approaches, sidewalks and street pavements along their property frontage on Lemon Avenue. The improvements were completed and accepted by the City in 1986. The Lien against this property has been paid for in full thus fulfilling the requirement and eliminating the need for the Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement. City Engineer WJO:JLM:ly Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RELEASING A REAL PROPERTY IMPROVEMENT CONTRACT AND LIEN AGREEMENT WITH RAY A. AND NANCY JONES WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 86-82, accepting a Real Property Improvement Contract and Lien Agreement with Ray A. and Nancy Jones WHEREAS, said Real Property Improvement contract and Lien Agreement recorded in Official Records of San Bernardino County, California, on April 25, 1986, as Document No. 86-108006; and WHEREAS, said Real Property Contract and Lien Agreement is not longer required. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA does hereby resolve and release said Real Property Improvement contract and Lien Agreement and that the City Clerk shall cause Release of Lien to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. S1 DATE: September 7, 1994 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT TO:. Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, Executive Director FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager BY: Olen Jones, Senior Redevelopment Analyst SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF A LOAN AGREEMENT WITH SANWA BANK FOR THE FINANCING OF THE ARCHIBALD AVENUE MASTER STORM DRAIN AND THE "GAP" LOAN FOR THE NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION'S VILLA DEL NORTE. RF. CC~MMENnATION Approve the Loan Agreement with Sanwa Bank, and authorize the Chairman to execute the documents. BACKGROUND In December, 1993, the Agency approved a Disposition and Development Agreement with Northtown Housing Development Corporation (NHDC) for the development of the Villa Del Norte family housing. Under the terms of this agreement, the Agency will provide a "gap" loan to NHIX~ to ensure affordability to families in the targeted income groups identified in the Affordable Housing Strategy. As a condition of approval for Villa Del Norte, NHDC is required to construct the Archibald Avenue Master Plan Storm Drain. However, in order to make the project more competitive for tax credit purposes, the Agency will fund directly the construction the storm drain. In August, 1994, the Agency approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SCHDC), outlining the terms and conditions for the funding of the acquisition of existing housing units in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Under the terms of the MOU, Agency funding of the acquisition of existing units is contingent on the Agency obtaining a loan for the construction of the Archibald Storm Drain and the "gap" loan. ANAl .YSIS In response to a request from SCHDC and the Agency, Sanwa Bank has submitted a proposal for the loan which meets the criteria established by the Agency. September 7, 1994 $txff Report - Sanwa Loan .Page 2 The loan is structured as a Hne of credit which may be drawn upon by the Agency as funding is required. Initially, the interest rate is variable, but may be fixed, in whole or in part, at the discretion of the Agency. Additionally, the loan is structured to accommodate the funding of the Agency's commitment to the "gap" loan without affecting the status of the tax credit financing. Respectfully submitted, Redevelopment Manager S~ 8Y:8I~ ; 8-81-~4; I:21PM; , -, B0~481~8;~ 2/? A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCH0 CUCAMONGA APPROVING THE FINANCING OF A PORTION OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVEEaPMENT PROJECT BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDBVELOPMENT AGENCY WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") is authorized pursuant to Chapter 8 (commencing with Section 33000) of Part I of Division 24 of the California Health and Safety Code (the "Act") to issue notes for any of its corporate purposes; and WHEREAS, the Agency is proposing to issue up to $8,694,000 aggregate principal amount of its notes for the purpose of increasing, improving and preserving the supply of low and moderate housing of benefit to its Rancho Redevelopment Project (the "Project"). NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve, determine and order as follows: Section 1. Approval o~ Financln~. This City Council hereby approves financing of a portion of the Project, by means the issuance of up to $8,694,000 principal amount of the Agency's notes, pursuant to provisions of the Act. effect 1994. ~pct~on 2. ~ffect~ve Date. immediately upon adoption- This Resolution shall take PASSED, APPROVEDandADOPTED this day of September, AYES: NOES: Dennis L. Stout, Mayor ATTEST Debra J. Adams, City Clerk DATE: FROM: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 29, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, Executive Director Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Manager SUBJECt: APPROVAL TO EXECUTE A JOINT POWERS AGRF~EMENT WITH THE FOLLOWING CITIES/C~UNTIES TO BECOME A MEMBER OF THE INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM; SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, COLTON, CORONA, HEMET, COUNTY OF INYO, ONTARIO, PALM SPRINGS, PALO VERDE VALLEY DISTRICT, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNARDINO, UPLAND, BANNING AND BEAUMONT. RECOMMENDATION Approve membership for Rancho Cucamonga Public Library in Inland Library System by agreeing to abide by the terms set forth in the Agreement for the Joint Exercise of Powers Relative to the Inland Library System and accepting the 1994/95 Plan of Service; authorize the membership payment of $1,500 and authorize the Mayor to execute the appropriate documents. BACKGROUND Inland Library System, formed in 1966 and currently numbering 14 member libraries within San Bernardino and Riverside counties, seeks to improve library services available to all residents of the member jurisdictions by promoting the sharing of resources through reciprocal borrowing, interlibrary loan, interlibrary reference assistance delivered through fax transmission and daily delivery of requested and returned library materials. Its funding is provided through membership fees and State support. On August 26, 1994, the Administrative Council of the Inland Library System voted unanimously to accept Rancho Cucamonga's application for membership to the System. ANALYSIS For a membership fee of $1,500 per year, the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library expands access for its residents to the materials and resources of 14 libraries within the Inland Empire and assures its residents of the fastest delivery of materials and information currently possible in the Library community. ul~y submitted, AGREEMENT FOR ll!E JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS RELATIVE TO TII{.-' INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM This Joint Powers Agreement, made under the provisions of Article 1, Chapter 5, Division 7, Title 1, 8f the Government Code (Section bSO0 et seq.) entered into and effective tills 28th day of June , 1977, by and between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO on behalf of the San Bernard|no County Free Library, hereinafter referred to as "San Bernardino County", the CITY OF COLTON, on behalf of the Colton Public Library, hereinafter referred to as "Colton", the. CITY OF CORONA, on behalf of the Corona Public Library, hereinafter referred to as "Corona", the CITY OF lIEMET, on behalf of tile Hemet Public Library, hereinafter referred to as "liemet", the COUNTY OF INYO, on behalf of tile Inyo County Free Library, hereinafter referred to as "Inyo", the CITY OF ONTARIO, on behalf of the Ontario City Library, hereinafter referred to as "Ontario", the CITY OF PALM SPRINGS, on behalf of the Palm Springs Public Library, hereinafter referred to as "Palm Springs", tile PALO VERDE VALLEY LIBRARY DISTRICT, on behalf of the Pale Verde Valley District Library, here|halter referred to as "l'alo Verde", the CITY OF RIVERSIDE, on behalf of the Riverside City and County Public Library, here|halter referred to as ~iverside", the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, on behalf of the San Bernard|no Public Library, l,ereinafter referred to as "San Bernard|no Public", and the Cliff OF UPLAND, on behalf of the Upland Public Library, hereinafter referred to as "Upland". W I TNESS E111: WltEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernard|no did on January 18, 1966, enter into a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Colton and formed a cooperative Library System under the provisions of the Public Library Development Act of 1963, Chapter 1.S, Division 20, Part 4, of tile California Education Code (Section 37111 et seq.) in order to extend and improve their respective overall services standards; and WHEREAS, the other cities, counties, and district listed above did subsequently enter into the ~{uJ'cil 27, 19o7 Agreement and its amendments of December 18, {907, and May 4, 1970, to join and participate in a cooperative library system similar to thst originally formed by the City of Colton and the County of San Bernard|no; and WHEREAS, each city, or governmental Ero-p represented, party-to this Ai~reement, desires to form such a cooperative library system to be known as the "lnlsnd Library System"; and W|iERF_AS, the Librarians of the various libraries have developed and agreed upon plan of library service necessitating cooperation among saiH libraries; and W!|EREAS, all parties wish to clurify and reailoc-',te the duties, functions, and responsibilities for the operation of the system; and WHEREAS, said public agencies arc authorized to contract with each other for the joint exercise of any conunon power; , NOW, THEREFORE, the San Bernardino County Library and the aforementioned libraries in consideration of their mutual promises and the provisions hereinafter stated and the performance thereof and for other valuable and adequate considerations, agree as follows: I. EFFEC~ OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall be a novation of the agreement entitled "Joint Powers Agreement Between the County of San Bernardino, the City of Colton, the City of Upland and the City of San BernardtaD" (dated March 27, 1967) and the "First Amendment" (dated [~ecember 18, 1967) and "Second Amendment (dated May 4, 1970) thereto. There is hereby created the Inland Library System, also hereinafter called "the SYSTElq*', comprised of the parties to the Agreement. The System hereby created is, through its agencies and trustees, successor to all rights and liabilities of the System as it was previously constituted pursuant to the former agreements. This Agreement shall become binding upon its ratification by all parties. The effective date of this agreement shall be the date the last party to this agreement executed the same and shall be inserted in the appropriate blanks in the first sentence of this Agreement. 2. PURPOSE OF THE AGREEMENT: The purpose of this Agreement is'to form a cooperative library system hereinafter known as the "Inland Library System" or *'SYSTEM" to improve and coordinate the public library functions of the parties. The SYSTEM shall perform cooperative library functions as necessary to fulfill this purpose including, but not limited to the following: (a) Reception of moni~es under Chapter I.S of Division 20 of Part 4 of the Education Code of California as the same may be amended from time to time. (b) Reception of benefits under the Federal Property and Administration Services Act of 1949. as amended and as the same may be amended from time to time. (c) Reception of such other monies and benefits as the SYSTEM is eligible to receive. (d) Coordination of reference and research services. (e) Providing for interavailability of books, films, information and materials among all service outlets of the parties of - 2 - this Agreement. (f) Coordination of interchangeable borrowing privileges among libraries of the parties. (g) .Providing for cooperative in-service training, cooperative public relations, and cooperative assistance and guidance in - adult, young adult, and children's services through workshops and similar programs. (h) Making applications and contracts for grants from public or private entities to carry out the purposes of the SYSTEM. (i) Coordination of book orders andperiodical subscriptions as seem feasible. (j) Undertaking other cooperative library projects which may be recommended by a majority of the Executive Council of the SYSTEM. POWER OF THE SYSTEM: The Inland Library System shall have all powers, prerogatives, and authority necessary to effectively plan, operate, and administer a public library system and to establish, improve, and extend library services within the geographic boundaries of the SYSTEM. The INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM shall do whatever is necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement and shall make and enter into such contracts, incur such debts and obligations, receive contributions from its members, and perform such other acts as are necessary to the accomplishment of the purposes of this Agreement· The INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM shall constitute a separate public entity pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 6507· The Executive Council, or such administrative officer as it may from time to time appoint, may administer and exercise this power pursuant to the rules and regulations as adopted in the manner set out hereafter· COI~40N PO~ERS: The common powers to be exercised pursuant to this Agreement are the powers of each party to provide public library services, and the common powers shall be exercised so as to establish, aid, assist, extend, improve, and enlarge public library services in the territorial jurisdiction of each of the parties. GOVERNING BODY OF SYSTEM: The INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM will be administered by an Executive Council consisting of the Head Librarian of each member or such other person as has been designated-by the governing body of such member. Governing bodies of Council members may designate alternates to sit, deliberate, and act in the absence of the appointed Council member. The Council will elect one of its members as Chairman, who shall hold office for a one-year term. Said term shall be for the operating year. The Chairman, or the designated alternate, shall preside over all meetings of the Council. The Council shall draw up rules and regulations from time to time as they deem advisable. It shall plan and determine the use to be made of any funds received by the SYSTEM from any source and may expend such funds in accordance with such plans and determinations. The Executive Council shall direct and approve the applications for SYSTEM grants. Unless otherwise specified herein, the Executive Council shall act only upon affirmative vote of a majority of its members. The Executive Council shall supervise administration of the SYSTEM, set policy, and shall advise the various agents of the SYSTEM on actions necessary to carry out the purposes of this Agreement. ADMINISTRATION OF THE SYSTEM: Subject to the supervision, policies, and advice of the Executive Council, the SYSTF. M shall be administered by the designated agents as follows: (a) Fiscal Agent: San Bernardino County shall act as contracting fiscal agent for the SYSTEM in accordance with provisions of the Government Code, Section 6505.5, hereby incorporated by reference. The role of the fiscal agent may be transferred to another member library upon the decision of the Executive Council and the approval of the State Library. (b) Miscellaneous Agents: The Executive Council with the prior consent of the governing body of the appointee, may from time to time appoint a party hereto to act as agent for the SYSTEM and to administer such aspects of the SYSTEM for such period of time as the Executive Council may specify. Any agent so appointed shall not be required to incur any expense in connection with its agency or administration pursuant to such appointment for which express funds have not been approvod in the SYSTEM's budget; however, such agent shall not be reimbursed for expenditures in excess of the amounts budgeted by the SYSTEM for such purposes. ACCOUNTABILITY OF FUNDS/REPORTS OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEME!fI~/ANNUAL AUDITS: The agreement shall provide for strict accountability of all funds and report of all receipts and disbursements. lO. The public officer performing the functions of auditor or controller, as determined pursuant to Section 6S05.5, shall either make or contract with a certified public accountant or public accountant to make an annual audit of the accounts and records of related accounts of every agency or entity. In each case, the minimum requirements of the audit shall be those'prescribed by the State Controller for special districts under Section 26909 of the Government Code and shall conform to generally accepted standards. Where an audit of an account and records is made by a certified public accountant or public accountant, a report thereof shall be filed as public records with each of the contracting parties to the agreement and also with the county auditor of the county in which each of the contracting parties is located. Such report shall be filed within 12 months of the end of the fiscal year under examination. Any costs of the audit, including contracts with, or employment of, certified public accountants or public accountants, in making an audit pursuant to this section shall be borne by the SYSTF)4. TITL~ OF PROPERTY: Ownership of items purchased with SYSTID4 funds shall be in the SYSTEN or in member libraries as the Executive Council say in each instance determine. The Executive Council say direct any party to this Agreement to acquire or transfer possession and title to personal property acquired with SYSTi]I funds. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY: Any party who is entrusted With SYSTEN property or SYSTFJ4 funds shall provide an official bond or a public employees' fidelity bond in an amount satisfactory to the Executive Council, unless this requirement for such bond is waived by the Executive Council. Additionally, each party with title to SYS17J4 property. shall have that property included in the coverage schedule of its public and institutional property damage insurance policy. Each party entrusted with SYSTEM property shall be charged with the duty of its day-to-day maintenance. The decision to repair or replace seriously damaged or destroyed property shall be left to the discretion of the Executive Council. OBLIGATION 1~ ACCEPT SERVICE: It is understood and agreed between the parties hereto, that SYSTFJ4-wide programs shall be accepted by each party. ~ach party shall have an affirmative obligation to cooperate in the performance and execution of all SYSTB4-wide programs and SYSTEM policies. ADe4INISTRATION OF MFJ4BF, R LIBRARIES: The sember libraries shall administer their own public libraries independently, selecting their own books, hiring their own personnel, and operating according to the policies and rules established by their own governing bodies. .' 12. NEI~ MFJ4IIERS: Upon approval by majority vote of the total voting members of the Executive Council of said SYSTEN, any public entity shall be permitted to join the Inland Library System upon its execution of the said Joint Powers Agreement, and its further agreement to the Plan of Servi~e ss agreed upon by all parties to said Joint Powers Agreement; provided, however, that said permission as to joinder to the SYSTEM shall be contingent upon the State of California funds for a Public Library Services System Grant being spproved by the State Librarian or contingent on the provision by said applicant public entity to said Inland Library System of sn amount of money equal to the proposed Public Library Services System Grant, which is available st the time of said public entity*s application for joinder to said SYSTEN. 13. LIABILITY ON SYSTEN CONTRACTS: If an unfavorable judgment is rendered and becomes final against a party to this Agreement upon s contractual obligation properly undertaken by said party as agent for the SYSTEN, then all parties to this Agreement shall contribute towards satisfaction of said judgment in proportion to the population served by each party to t~ total population served by the SYSTEM, not to exceed ILS resources. 14. LIABILITY FOR OTHER OCCURRENCES: Except ss provided in Paragraph 13 above, each party to this Agreement, whether individually or collectively, does not assume, nor shall any party be deemed to assume, liability for: (a) Any act or omission of any one party to this Agreement in performance of this Agreement; or (b) The payment of worker's compensation as indemnity to officers, agents, or employees of any one party to this Agreement for injury or illness arising out of performance of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the provision of Government Code sections 89S et seq., regarding contribution or indemnification, each member to this Agreement, for its own negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in the performance of this Agreement, and in this regard each party hereto agrees to defend and hold each and every other party to this Agreement, its officers, agents and employees, harmless from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, liabilities or losses arising out of or because of any acts done or omitted to be done by any member to this Agreement in performance of this Agreement. IS. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT FOR GOODS AND SERVICES: Any party hereto desiring to contract with any public or private entit~ or individual for any goods or services to be paid for in ~ole or in part, either directly or by way of reimbursement to such party, with SYSTEN funds shall obtain 17. the approval of the Executive Council for any contract involving an expenditure of SYSTEH funds in an amount of $500.00 or more. All contracts entered into by the various agents for the SYSTEN shall recite that the agent is acting in behalf of and for the benefit of all parties to this Agreement. NI~RANAL: Any member library may withdraw from the Inland Library System by serving formal written notice of its intent to so withdraw at least one hundred and twenty (120) days prior to the end of the operating year. The SYSTEN shall continue to exist so long as there are two member libraries, provided that these two meet the requirements of SYSTEHsembership. Libraries which withdraw are subject to such procedures governing withdrawal as the Executive Council shall beforehand have established. TERt41NATION OF SYSTEH: This library system say be terminated at any time by resolutions of the governing boards of all of the members in this SYSTEH at the time termination is voted. A decision to terminate shall becme effective whenever designated in the termination Agreement. Upon termination, all just clams against the SYSTEH shall be paid, distribution made to the State and Federal government as required by applicable law, and the remaining assets distributed among all parties who are then members of the SYSTEH in proportion to the population of each member in relation to the total population of the SYSTEN. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each public agency has caused this instrument to be executed by its res~ctive officials as duly authorized by the legislative bodies thereof. Dated' this ATTEST: Leona Rapo~ort Clerk of Board of Supervisors day of DEC 6 · 197 Dated: · 197 ATTEST: ATTEST: Dated: ATTEST: Maygaret Bromley, Clerk COUNTY. "O' 19 .~.~., ; ~,~t~ ~ D.~a~ . . '/ Da~~Z~ ~2~ , 197 ~//~ ~.Z!"JTY CI;Y CLFEJC Dated: JUN :1 1977 , 1973, , 197 ATTEST: Dated: ATTEST: City Clerk Dated: Dated: Hayor ' ?~ l) :' J-he 28. , 1977 ~ , 19~ ATTEST: · Ilated:__._ ~ / 7 , 19 72 ATTEST .' Dated this 17th day of February , 1982 BANNING UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT LIBRARY Board Clerk Abron Evans, Board President -9- AA ATTEST .- 7Zlerk of Board Dated.- September 20 BEAUMONT DISTRICT LIBRARY President , 1982 -10- MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RE: AG.REE~ #76-796: J'T. PO~4P-i',S AGRee.: I~V, Jh~il)LIBIUL~,Y SYSTEZI: APPROVED AcCinC on the recosmzmendaCion of General Services ASezscy Administrator. on motion by Sul~ervtsor Townsend, duly 8sconeled by Supervisor };tt,'~-_aa.~ky uttd carried, the Board of Supervisors hereby approves Joint Powers AF, ree- menC ~.'76-796 for cite Inland Library Sys~-.em between the County and various cozmm.micies within the cormties of San Bernardit.o. lnvo end Riverside. provtdin8 for Inland Library System to function au~ono,.~ously wig'his the scope of the authority granted member libraries b), Cite State Library Code and the charter and rules of the .-,overnin8 body of s'he member iibrary, and further authorizes ice Cltairman to si~.n enid Joint Exercise of Pogers agreement indiestinc tills board's approval of Cho terms and conditions therein conCa/ned. PASSED AND ADOPTED by clte Board of Supervisors of the County of San BernardaLno, State of CaXlEornia by the followins vote: AYES: SLTPERVISORS: HayfieZa. Kinsky Toeamend, Smith. !lansberger NOES: SUPERVISORS: None ' ABSENT: S UP~RVlSORS: None StAlE Or CALIFO~INIA COUNTY O~ SAN 8EHNAHf~INO I. LCONA RAPOI:OIII. C. leek of Ih~ 6-.~,d ~l Slet, vv,so,~ ~ff S,4,, P.f,,;aed,,,4, C'e,~aev. (' lhheit.,lo h4--&~ly Cl~;tll%' II~t, IOellgole~1 IO be I!/uII, IlllieI Iklll C~ffIN t COIly fd Ihe errold 0l elf ak;le.lee 'T9 %"' "' "' o,,.,..,, ,,..,,, .., ,.,.., CC: 11 members c/o F. Kennedy of CSA Auditor Cle,k CSA'[~'e~4~.ng~d~w/12 acres for siCnat s .. ~ .... File ur 08/30/94 /' 12:30 ~'909 784 1158 Inland/SIRCULS CALIFORNIA LIBP, ARY SERVICES ACT Annual Plan of Sarvlc8 Symen Population Profib, I~gS I1. Systera Name: In 1 and ._ , 2. Total Popu[a~on of System Service Area2,968,q1~0 3. J,..,-...~ ,.,,...,o.."- ,,,-,.... '-- ,,~,.,,,,o,.. 'PmnomicalLy nilldv2qt~rnd . ' (Below poverty level)360,.43Z ]p,,;,.~.ope!.i,w~ ' I 14;840 i Childre: ,~ Youth- · Under5 ' 275,033 9.3 _. .5to9 I 222,607 ' 'l 7.5 ,_ _ · l0 to 14 ' I 207,767 H',qdir'...nowl J 47 ~, 896 .~ 16 ~iP"m"'rs of limited I",~J'leh Or I 296,810 I~.Hish .~, Second '°"'"";"""~""'~I,.e,~osI .... ;;: ;::.. a El · Hispa~c I , e · Asbm ' I 103,883 I 3.5 20,778 .7 · Naive American · Other (specify) Geopnhi,--~Lv holat. mi 4. List source(s) of this data: California / Dept. 949,792 32 · 41,553 J 14 · 5,046 I 1.7 ~ of Finance, U.S. census Bureau [2]0o2 ' Describe bri~lty bow tbls data will be used to plan C/~A-funded services. 08/30/94 12:31 ~'909 784 1158 Inland/SIRCULS CALIFORNIA LIBRARY SERVICES ACT ~TE.D WORKLOAD Xehrence Program, FY 1994/95 What is the estimated number of answen found: For questions a,~fu,,d to sysu~n t~: Member Non-public Libraries in State a. by your system reference structure 1,890 330 b. by non-public ltbrazies in site c. by pubUc h*b'*rartes or systems other than your own 4 1 58 12 d. by SCAN I [e. by the State Library 145 27 o) Other Pubtic Libraries or Systems 2,226 172 f. answers not found 18 7 27 Total 2,115 377 ~timaUsd Number of Reference Questions lbcgived Locally by Member Libraries: Estimate Total Number of Refemsce Questions l;-ntned by your Syse~n Rc~euco Program: 2,500 F. sfim~__nyJ Total Number of Training Evems Presented: Estimated Total Number of Locm/Staff Trained: 0 2,500 1,850,000 ~003 L"'i~A43 - by. 3s4 08/~0/94 lZ:~I 'ff909 ?84 1158 InIend/SIRCULS ~004 : Page Name oZ System ZNLA~D PlAN OF 8ERr'ICE, 1994/95 o~ ~ hZer~ 8e~t~e (5 C~ o~ ~if. b~a~s Sea. 2015~' 1. Se~ice spe~i~cat~on (s) adopted: a. Provide consulting se~ices ~or me~e= b. Provide opportunities for 11b~a;y s~a~ to meet together the sha~ln~ o~ Performance objective (s) adopted: The Reference Center staff will be available to provide instruction to member libraries on the best ways to answer questions using local collections. The System will sponsor meetings of the Children's Services, Adult Readers and Information Services and Automation & Technology Committees to enable library staff to share information on programs and collections. Reason(s) for choosing I and 2 above= Because of staff cutbacks, the above objectives are the maximum amount of service that System staff can provide. What would the service described above be without this com~onent~ State in the same terms as the performance objectives above. LeSS effective use would be made of the existing information sources due to a lack of traiwnii~. Collections would be poorer due to a lack of new resources. Library staff familiarity would be less able to help patrons with their information needs. One-paragraph description of the methods to be used in providing this canponent, and the prince_pal resources to be used. ~ndicate system and member library staff involved. The System Reference Center staff will use the collecti6ns o£ the Riverside City and County Public Library and the University of California at Riverside to assist in the provision of consul- tation service. System staff will coordinate the work of the committees. What evidence of benefit will be provided, and how will it be gathered? A survey of member library staff will be distributed once a year, asking for an evaluation of service. CLSA-3-Rev. 3/94 08/30/94 12:32 9909 784 115'8 .= ..... Inland/SlRC~LS- '~ . ,,;.;?/v! .,' 1005 Name of System. Inland PLAN OF BEItVICl, 1994/92 ,~ Services ~o ~he Underserved (5-Cede c~ Ca!iZ, lmgslati~ne See,. 20156).f 1. What underserved Qroup(s) were identified durin~ the year £or improvement of reference services? a. Geographicall isolated b. Institutionalfred c. Handicapped d. Children current-Ziscal 2a. Wha~ potential services were identified a= the System i&vel for the improvemen~ of reference service to these underserved groups?- The System will answer reference questions submitted b~ member: libraries and SIRCULS members from ~hese. groups.. The S~ce~ will, assist children by making available printed. mateE~-~. and~r: .,' assisting in cooperative planning efforts~- :- .,~'- : ~, .--,. 2b, Which of these services was evaluated as achievable and-benef~eia~,?, for the improvement of reference services to the underserved? All of the above : _-, ., 3. Based on the above, wha~ service specification(s) are. adopted. for the tung fiscal year? ,. ,,=~-..- ..- ..... - _..._... a. The'Systemwill answer questions submitted b~members"o~ ....... these grou's. - -, · Updated Ca[deco~t and NewberyMedal bookmarks will-be mde -~ ,' available to all members. c. Printing and other support will r~eev[rovided for..a. system-. wide hi-monthly children's-book ..ewmeeting.,: .,.r d. The System will coordinate and support a.childzen's sunmar · reading program. - --, .: .... 4. What performance objective(s) are adopted and why did you choose ..... them? ' a. At least 25% of our reference questions wilt--be~received will be from members of these groups. b. Printed material willbe provided in · ~lmelymennar.... 5. Describe briefly the methods to be used in providin ,,_ · - Reference questions w~ll be answered by System sta££ using the Tesou~ces oK the Riverside-City and County {ublic '- Library, the University of California at P-tverside, and other ILS and SIRCULS member libraries, as well as on-line resources and re{errals to o~her resources. Ss. Amount of System Reference allocation budgeted for this component (5 Calif. Regulations Sac. 20156[c]) is $25,000. 6. What evidence of benefit will be provided, and how will it be gathered? Patron and staff evaluations of the System Reference Cen~er will be collected on a sampling basis. CLSA-3-Rev. 3/94 51 08/3.0/94 12:32 ~909 794 1158 Inland/SlRCU~S ~ .... ~006, *..,, Page 4 Name of System Tnland ]P,..MI OF IIRV'J:CZ, 1994/95 CLBA ByE'ham Ra~ezence :hogTam, Cceqponent: lnl:ezIJ,bza:y' Z:afezenca . ,' .... (5 Cc~ie of cal:L~. lm~le~Lons see, 20157) r....:....... ..... 1. Servlce specl{lcation(s) adopted: (NB: Systems may adopt additional specification6; if so, llst them, ) a. The highest possible percentage of questions will be. ... answered. The answers shall be delivered to the user within an acceptable timeperiod. Answers shall mee~ the user's need in terms of amount, format, language, and accuracy of information. d. Specifications a-b should be carried out at the lowest* 4_ possible cost. ---. 2. Performance objective(s} adopted: (Systems may adopt higher or additional objectives; if so, state them. Minimum specifications.are** 01 set in Code of Calif. Regulations Sac. 2 57(b).) ae Answers shall be provide for 90% of all questions referred from member libraries. 70% of answers. shall be returned to the ori insring member=- library within 10 working days of the questYons having been transmitted by the library into the System's reference referral structure. *'~, .. NO objective set as of April 1, 1983. · n o to those listed in 1. and 2. above): 4. what would the service described above be without this component? State in the same terms as ~he performance objectives above. The more than 2500 questions that the System expects to receive- in 1994/95 would go unanswered. Local exectations of library service would be reduced due to the inabi~ity of libraries to access sources for reference referral. 5, One-paragraph description of the methods to be used in providing this component, and the principal resources to be used. IndiFate system and member library staff involved. System Reference Center staff will use the collections at the Riverside City and County Public Librat , the University of California at Riverside, other member l~raries and SIRCUL$ libraries to obtain information and materials. Referral of questions to outside agencies will be made when a propriate. On- lin~ resources and direct telephone contact will ~e used· The Reference Center will be available through direct telephone contact using an 800 telephone number for both voice and fax communication. Delivery of material will be through the System delivery, UPS, US Mat1 and fax. 6. whet evidence of benefit will be provided, and how wili it be gathered? On-going use of questionnaires to library staff and patrons will be used. These are sent out with answers to questions on a sampling basis. CLSA-3-Rev. 3/94 08/~0/94 12:33 '~909 ?84 1158 Inland/~IRCULS., .,~ CAI-IFO~NIA LIBRARY SFtVICES ACT RSTIMAT~ WORKlOAD Commpn~cstlons ~ ~ 1994/9f. What is the estimated number of mcssagcs sent via each communication device liswd below, o~ an annual basis? OCLC ILL Subsystem b. Tdefacsimile C. ~I__NqZOnjC Mail I d. Intc,mct l e. Other (Specify) 0 3,700 08/30/1t4 12:33 'a909 784 1158 - Ialand/SIRCULS 'CAI/FORNIA LIBRARY SERVICES ACT ESTIMATED WORKLOAD Intrasystem Delivery Program, 1~ Lg~I~ Items d~livered to: $ystem Member a. S~ member public Hbntry. 104,500 b. Non-public librath in system area. 7, 125 Total ~ 111,625 c. Num_her Of delivery vehicles. i d. Estimntmd m,mher Of miles traveled by all systezn vehicles. · Number of delivery stops. · . F~/sehedule of d~ltvery servict g. Percent of items to be delivered: Non-Publio Librarie~ in 14,250 1,425 15,675 System Owned 0 Total 118,750 8,550 127,300 Vendor 1 113,360 Courier daily to 11 UPS to 2 U.S. Mail 5 UPS 10 System Van 0 Coalacted Van _82 Other 3 08/30/04 12:34 ~909 ?84 1158 Inland/SlRCULS ~009 Name o~ System: TN:r,M~D CALIFO~NZX LXBRa~T ~ERVlCEN ArT System Pla~ of 8ervioe, Ff 1994/95 C~-.~,anicatl~n and Delivex~ Program System name: INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM Performance Objectives: a. 90% of intrasystemmessages will be received by addresssea within 24 hours. b. 90% of items sent by intrasystem delivery will be delivered within one working day. Equipment Replacement Planning: The System maintains an equipment replacement fund. The System will budget $0 for 1994/95 for this account. The balance is $18,944. Inventory of Available Resources: ae Contrac~ with commercial delivery service to provide delivery service. Riverside and San Bernardino Counties branch delivery systems. United Parcel Service to two members. U.S. Postal Service Toll-~ree telephone lines for voice and fax messages to ILS. Talefacsimile equipment purchased by the System is in all member libraries, six branches, ILS office and SIRCULS office. Interlibrary items will be sent by System delivery and connecting member library branch delivery services whenever possible. Otherwise, UPS or USPS will be used. Delivery to Pomona Public Library will continue on a weekly basis in order to deliver material to MCLS libraries. Analysis of existing deliver routes and loads will take place at least once a year to assure ~est use of available equipmen~. Plan of Action: a. User Benefit Expected: A coordinated intras stem communication and delivery s~stem will provide the user witK a much fas=er response time to requests for information and materials than would be possible if such services did not exist. Dependence on USPS or o=her prorider of delivery service would man a slower response time at a higher cost. Related Non-CLSAActivities: The System provides delivery service for SIRCULS members in the San Bernardino, Riverside, and Palm Springs areas, either on a regularly scheduled or on-demand basis· Other SiRCULS members are served by UPS or USFS. SIRCULS m~mbers also have access to ILS services through the toll-free telephone lines. Evaluation: ' a. A delivery workload sampling survey will be prepared three times a year. b. User satisfaction surveys will be conducted on an on-going basis. 08/30/94 / Z2:34 '~'900 784 1~56 ,Inland/8IRCULS, ~. CALIFORNIA I. IBRA~Y SN. RVZCF.,q ACT B'TIMA~ WORKLOAD System Advisory Board Program', FY 1994/93' ~010 Number of mereben on Advisory Board. 7 Number of Advisory Board meetings ~ be held. 4 Estimated number of System meetings/events which SAB members will ~-,--.d;. Estimated numbe~ of miles to be traveled annually, all mcmbcrs.. 5,00{~':= ' ' e. Estimated number of overnight stays required, all members. CLSA-43 - a.~. ~9. 05/30/94 / 12:35 '0'009 ?84 1158 Inland/SIRCI~S ~ 011 , * G Name. of Sys~en: INLAND 2N,stem ~lan o~ 2arvioe, FY 1994/95 S~e'l:am Adv:Leoz. y Board System Name: INLAND LIBRARY SYSTEM ObJ active.: 75% of SAS members will regularly attend board meetings. 100% of SAB members will be able to understand System services will enough to give a brief presentation about-the System to a. loca} community group within one year of appoin=~ent. The SAB will evaluate at least one of the CLSA funded System service programs each year. residents of service area. " " Inventory of Available Resources: ...... a. System brochures, and other public relations material. b. Workshops presented by Friends o~ California Libraries friends groups, and CALTAC. Plan of Action: ,: ,; ,,..:..~.;._.:.. a. SAB members will be given an orientation to system services and wall discuss services provided by the System ' b. A member of the Administrative Council will attend'eachmee~"&~ the SA~ and be a resource in the continuin trainin of the SAB members meeting their responsibilities, an~ in distYnguishing between local service needs and S stem-wide service needs. c. SAB members who have the opportunity should make a presentation the services provided by the System. on d. At each meeting members will report on any local contact made since the previous meeting and inform the Board of new service needs that should be considered by the System. e. The SAB will review the Plan of Service and make recommendations for any changes to the Council. f. The SAB will review the CLSA budget requests and make recommendations for any needed changes. User Benefit Expected: . Contacts between local ccnmunit groups and SAB members will facilitate the transmission of ~dentified user needs to the Administrative Council, which will take appropriate action to satisfy these demands. Related Non-CLSAActivities: The SAB will also monitor on-going System programs not funded by CLSA. Evaluation: Records will be kept of members' participation in SABmeettngs, Administrative council meetings, and local community contacts. Minutes of the SPa meetings will reflect input from members on new service needs· These minutes will be distributed to the Administrative Council and CLSB for information and consideration. Actions taken by Administrative Council on recommendations made by the SAB will be reported back· SPa members wall be surveyed once a year to determine their feelings about the effectiveness of the Board in meeting its objectives. DATE FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT .. , August 29, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lain, AICP, Executive Director Deborah Kaye Clark, Library Manager APPROVAL TO EXECLrlE AN AGREEMENT WITH OCLC ONLINE COMPIfrER LIBRARY CENTER TO PROVIDE SHARED ONLINE ..... CATALOGLNG UTILITIES FOR THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA PUBLIC ' LIBRARY. ' RECO~ATION Approve contract with Online Computer Library Center. (OCIA2).-to enable Rancho Cucamonga Public Library use of cataloging, interlibrary loan and search services provided by OCLC. =: BACKGROUND Online Computer Library Center, Inc., is a non-profit corporation2~of cooperating library members which has developed a computerized system for creating and maintaining a regularly updated database of bibliographic records, holdings and other information supplied and shared by members. The system is accessible through on-line telecommunications by members through contractual .agreement. FINANCIAL IMPACT $20,000 has been budgeted in the 1994/95 to cover the costs of on-line cataloging and interlibrary loan. ANALYSIS City Council approval of contract agreement with Online Computer Library Center, Inc., will insure Rancho Cucamonga Public Library participation in OCLC catalogtrig and interlibrary loan services which will; 1). Give the Library cost effective access to on-line book catalogtrig information, speeding up a technical library process which will get books and information to library users faster; 2) Give the Library access to book holdings information throughout the nation by participation in the California State recommended OCLC database, greatly improving the chances of library users of borrowing a book not owned by the local library, and-3)Provide the Library with the ability to use "First Search", a bibliographic finding tool useful in reference searches as well as interlibrary loan location. f~ly submitted, ~ . 0CLC850212:01 NFP Shared Cata/oc:Jin9 [XZLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Catalogin9 I II III V Ae VI · VII VIII IX De X Preamble .............................................. ~~P eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 1 2 6 In General ............................................ 7 Terminals OCLC Software ......................................... 9 Teleco~unications .................................... 10 Technical Support to Participent ...................... ~ Subscription Tapes .......................... 11 New [hline Processes and Offline Proaucts and Services. 12 Retrieval of Records by the State ..................... 12 Patrieval of Records by Participant ................... 12 RESPONSIBILITIES (F PARTICIPANT Standards ............................................. 13 Current Cataloging .................................... 13 Non-Member Services ................. . ................. 14 Site Preparation ...................................... 14 Charges ......................................... . ..... 14 Terminal Printer Port ................................. 14 Attachments to and Use of the OCLC SyBt~n ............. 15 Payments and Discounts ................................ 16 Modification of Charges and Discounts .................. ~ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 17 USEA~D~~Fi~C83S ........................... 18 WARRANTIF.~ ,A~X) LI~(:::[~S ~ T.TARTT.TTZ ............... 19 By Partt~tl~nt .................... . ................... 21 Ilcense Grant ......... ·.--...-.-. ...... ........ ..... .. 22 Survival of Rights and Obligations ............... ..... 22 ~~ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 23 0CE~850212:01 NPp Shared Cataloging Am'/(LE XII TERM AM) TE~MINATIO~ .................................. 23 Z~1:71'~1~-ae~ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 25 Effect of Waiver ........................... . ........ .. 26 Headings ..... ......................................... 26 Applicable Law ........................................ 26 Originals ............................................. 26 Entire A~r~-~=ment ...................................... 27 61 EXHIBIT D 'Access to O~LC Online System will be by (check as appropriate) [ ] Dial Access [ ] Dedicated Line Check [ ] if P~rticipant is a CLSA Cooperative Library System 0CLC850212 ~01 NFP Shared CatalogZng and OCLC ONLINE CO~UTER LIBRARY CENTER, INCORPORATED THIS AGR~F2qT ("Agreement") is made as of the date of last _~ignature below by and between , a not-for-profit institution or~3anized and existing under the laws of ~he State of California, .hereinafter referred to for purposes of this Agreement as "Participant", and OCLC ONLINE COMPUTER LIBRARY CENTER, INCORPORATED, a not-for-profit institutio~ organized and existing under the laws of the State of Ohio, "OCLC". hereinaftar referred to for purposes of T3~is Agreement as WITNESSETH: M~EREAS, OCLC is an orUanization of cooperating library mentDers which has clewloped, by means of their financial support, a ccmputerized system for creating and raintaiLing a regularly ~t~ da~ of bibltographic records, holdings and other informati~m supplied by such meters and other parties, and for creating certain related products, which system is accessible prtnartly through on-line telec~a,,unicaticns forming a 1 OCLCB50212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging par~ of the system (the "OCLC System"), and is engaged, as well, An research and development toward improvements thetein~ and WHEREAS, OCLC is engaged, among other activities, in =eking widely available to its members, by cc~ltract, (i) access to the O(=,C System and (ii) cer6ain collateral processes, products and services; and WHEREAS, bibliographic records of the holdings of CLSA participants (as defined below) have been or will be loaded into the OCLC System; and WHEREAS, Partic/pant ks a CLSA par~ic/pant and desires to be a general member of ._OCLC as defined in the OCLC Code of Regularices: and WHEREAS, the parties desire to contract as herein provided, and in cormecticn therewith to acknowledge a public purpose to be served of furthering ease of access to and use of worldwide scientific, literary and educational knowledge and infoh, atic~: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of t/~ covenants and undertakings set forth herein, OCLC and Participant hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I - DEFINITIONS. For purposes of this Agreement, the terms set forth below have The meanings indicated. A. "CLSA" means the California Library Services Act as defined in Section 187B~ through Section 18767 of the California Education B. "CLSA Current Acquisiti~ns" means all litrary materia/s acr/uired by purchase, gift, or exchange by CLSA par~icipants on or after Ju/y 1, 1978. O(LC850212:01 NFP CLBA: Shared Cataloging C. "CLSA Data Base" marts the d~ta base of bibicgraphic records and holdings information having the size and other characteristics described in Sectio~ 3.3 of the P,~, plus the additional records of CLSA Program Participants collected by the State for the period April 4 through November 30, '1984, together with all additi~lal biblicgraphic records and holdings co~stituting the cstaloging first performed or obtained during the term hereof of the CLSA Current Acquisitions oZ CLSA Program participants, added oaline or by Tapeloading to the OCLC Online Union Catalog under the Memorandum of Understanding or any of the coqtracts required to be entered into by OCLC under_. the Memorandum of Understanding. D. "CLSA Data Base Program" means the o~going cceputerized database program described in the CLSA. E. "CLSA Data Base Program Records" means the · mchine-readabl.e .records and holdings comprising the CLSA Data Base. F. wCLSA participants" mean~ thoae California public l~'brari~s' ~nd ~LSA Cooperative Library Systems participating in resource sharing cooperation as specified in the CLSA and designated as CLSA participants by the State of California under the Memorandum of Understanding, but excluding libraries and CLSA Cooperative Library Systems which the State advise OCLC have ceased to be CLSA participants. G. "CLSA Cooperative Library Syst-t" means a public library system which colsists of two (2) or more juriedictic~s entering into a written agreement to l~plement a regicrml program in accordtahoe with the CLSA, and which, as of the ef~ective date of the CLSA, ~s deskgnated a library systen under the CaliforrLta Public Library Services Act of 1963 or was a successor to such a library system, and all of the public libraries in which system are CLSA participants. 3 OCLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging H. "Current Cataloging" means all cataloging of bibliographic mterials first performed or obtained by Participant during the term hereof,, regardless of the date of acx]uisitiol Qr imprint of the item cataloged, which cataloging is in alphabet~ capable of being processed by the OCLC S~stem: provided, hc~ever, that Current Caraloging will not include the ca~aloging of materials to which Participant cust~marily gives less than "K" level cataloging as set for~,. in C~line Systems Bibliographic Input Standards, Second Editiota (1982), a copy of which has been furnished to Participant by OCLC prior to the effective date hereof, or such other minimal level of catalogin9 as OCLC may promulgate from time to time, or as may be agreed to by the parties from time to time. I. "First-time Use" means Participant's initial use of a catalog record in the OCLC Online Catalog for cataloging, where the record is not input by the Participant, J. "Memorandum of Understanding" means the memorandum of understanding between the State of California and OCLC for installat_ion and operation of a CLSA online, integrated de~a base system by OCLC. K. "OCLC-Derived Records" m~an~ all records stored in the OCLC Online Unicn Catalog other than (i) records designated in the M0 field a~ original cataloging by an institution which was, at the time of addition to the OCLC Online Unim Catalog a CLSA participant~ and (ii) records to which there has been attached by Tapeloading the holdings symbol of an institution which was at such time a CLSA participant, or the online ~dentii~ing syn~l used by OCZC for CZSA records intzodu~d ~s original catalog~ng as to which CXZ~ cannot ~dentiiy the original catalog~ng li~ary's symbol. 4 OCLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging L. "OCLC offline archive files" means (i) as to Shared Cataloging transactions by CLSA participants, the stored copies of all records created by use of the OCLC SystemT (ii) as to tapeloaded records which are euccessfully matched with records in the OCLC O~line Unicn Catalog, the +&toted copies of the records as they appear in the O<LC Online Unicn Catalog: and (iii) as to tapeloaded records which are not successfully matched with records in the OCLC Online Unic~ Catalog, the stored copies of all informatio~ recorded on the input tape in fields which are, at the time of the tapeload, %ralidated fields as defined in the OCLC System, provided, __hc~ever, that no local informerich will be retained in the OCLC offline archive file in the case of cc~solidated, tapeloaded records containing multiple institutions' local data, except for data hereafter specifically defined and agreed to in advance. M. "OCLC Online Unic~ Catalog" means the database of bibliographic records, library holdings infor~atic$1, indexes and related files of informatic~ (including Authority file, local data records and Name Address Directory) maintained online in, and forming a part of, the OCLC System. N. "OCLC participants" means the general members of OCLC, as defined in the OCLC Code of Regulatic~s in existence at the effective date hereof. O. "CX~C Services" means perscrulel training services, and field services such as services for the repair and maintenance of OCLC Terminals. P. "CMILC Software" means programs, programming, rcmtines, ccepilers and other software (together with related documentat/m) designed by or for OCLC, or acquired by O(LC, copies of which are rode available for transfer to OCLC participants generally. 5 OCLC850212:01 NIP CLSA: Shared Cataloging' this Agreement. "OCLC System" means the system as defined on page 1 of "OCLC Terminals" means terminals designed by and/or =enufactured by or for OCLC for operatic~ on the OCLC System. S... "Offline Products" ~eans (i) those OCLC products, which are derived frcm Participant's use of O~line Processes, including catal~ging products such as catalog cards and OCLC/MARC tapes, and (i~) OCLC Terminals ~or accessing the OCLC System. T. "Online Processes" means processes performed online and by ~eans of ccrmection to the O{LC System involving access to and use of the OCLC Online U~icn Catalog, including, but without limitation, cataloging, catalog card productiota, inter-library loan, acquisitions and serial control. U. "Shared Cataloging" means Participant 's use of the OCLC System to perform cataloging functicr~, online, fr~n terminals and through telecoemunicatlc~s, which functicms include, without limitation, the creaticm of catalog records and holdings informsti~ mintained within the OCLC System, and the editing of copies of catalog records. V. "State" means the State of California. W. "Tapeloading" means the submittal to OC~C of mchine-readeble tapes permitting input into the O(LC Online Unicn Catalog of data represeting an institut/o~'s cataloging records derived from s~urces other than O(LC, and the actual ir~ut of such data. ARTICLE II - O(LC MEMBERSHIP. Participant understands and age that by executi~9 this AcJrccment, it will becume a participant in OCLC and as such will be a 6 OC~C850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging .general member thereof as provided in Article IV of the Code of Regulation8 of OCLC. ARTICLE III - R~-~PCIqSIBILITIES OF OCLC. A. In General " OC~C shall, during the term hereof and subject to the terma and conditions of this Agreement, provide Participant (i) access to the OCLC System for use by Participant of the Online Processes set forth in Appendix 1 hereto attached and (ii) Offline Products, OCLC Services and copies of OC~C Software set forth in Appendix 1 hereto attached. OCLC reserves the righ_t_ to revise Appendix 1 fr~n time to time by adding items thereto, or on ninety (90) days prior written notice, deleting items therefrom, provided that any such deletions shall be applicable to OCLC participants generallyT and provided further that the Online Processes available to Participant shall in any event include access to the OCLC Online Union Catalog for the purposes of (i) bibliographic search and verification, (ii) inter-library loan, (iii) inter-library reference with CLSA participants and (iv) collection development. In addition, Participant shall be free to download records from the OCLC Online Union Catalog subject to the terms of Article IV-F below. O(~C's obligations under this Article III are subject to the prior receipt from Participant of documentation which my be requested from time to time from OCLC participants generally, including ~eparate or supplemental agreements for specific processes, products, services and modes of access to the OCLC System. O(ZC shall exert its reasonable best efforts to rake'the OCLC System available between the hours of 6:ee a.m. and le:0e p.m., Dublin, Ohio local time, Monday through Friday, and between the hcurs of a:ee a.m. 7 OC~C850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging · and 8:00 p.m., Dublin, Ohio local time on Saturday, except holidmys observed by OCLC (and the day before or after when such holidmys fall weekends). OC~C reserves the right to suspend availability of the OCLC System for required repair or meintenance, and where periods of downtime (x~cur as a re.sult of scheduled minte~ance functions, OC~C shall notify Participant thereof in advance, by o~line screen message or other appropriate means. Access to the OOLC System hereunder shall be by either (i) dedicated, leased communication facilities or (ii) dial access (either via public switched network or value-added network) as indiated on page 1 hereof. All products sold or transferred to Participant hereunder, except terminals, will be'delivered F.O.B. shipping point unless othezwise hereafter agreed from cue to case. All online traMactions by Participant will be journalized by O~C uniquely from other in~titutioM to in~ure identification of all bibliographic records, holdings and changes thereto input by CLSA participants. The OCLC System shall permit the attachment of a unique OC~C-assigned holdings symbol to each catalog record used or created by Participant for its cataloging under this Agreement, and shall permit the ~lline display of all holdings symbols attached to each such record. B. Terminals l a If access tO the OC~C System is by dedicated line, then ~X~C Terminals, together with the iMtallattm thereof, will be offered for sale to Participant in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the standard form of O(~C Terminal sale agreement, in effect at the date of the transaction, a c~py of which will be furnished to Participant on request. Currently, ~uch terminal aale a~reement for the O(~C M3~ Workstation ~erminal ("Workstation"), in the fozm 8 OCLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging ccmputer products acceptance form, is submitted to a representative of Participant at the tim and place of lnstallatio~ of the Workstation. Participant may use, for accessing the O(LC System any terminals not furnished by O(LC provided that the same are compatible with T. he CKILC System and approved as such by OCLC up(M1 written request from Participant. If access to the OCLC System is by dial access, the OCLC Terminals my be offered for sale to Participant, or Participant may use any terminals not furnished by OCLC. Requirements for compatibility of dial access terminals with the OCLC System will be published from time to time by OCLC. In special situatior~s, and subject to case-by-case approval by O(LC, Terminals my be offered for lease to Participant an accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the standard form of OCLC Terminal Lease Agreement in effect at the date of the transaction, a copy of which will be · furnished. to. Participant on request. 2. At the request of Par~icipant, OCLC will provide maintenance service for OCLC Terminals sold to Participant, which service shall be in accordance with ~ terms and conditio~s set forth in the then-current standard form of O(LC Terminal nainte~ance agreement, a copy of which will be furnished to Participant on request. C. O(LC Software Copies of O(LC Software set forth on Appendix 1 will be rode avai/able to Participant al the terms set forth in (i) license agreerants between Participant and OCLC to be signed by Participant or (ii) license agreements between Participant and O(ZC which ~eed not be signed by Participant, as O(ZC my stipulate free time to time. Currently, as to certain O(ZC Software, the license agreement is submitted to Participant as 9 OCLC850212:01 NFP QLSA: Shared CaCaloging a "tear-end-open" agreement which the parties intend to becowe effective upon the c~ening Of ~he software and documentation package by Participant. D. Telecon~unications l. OCLC 8hall arrange for and solely control a private telecommunimtion network between O(ZC, Participant and other participants, to permit rile delivery of Online Processes under this Agreement to terminals used to access the O(ZC System by dedicated line. O(ZC will, at all times, direct and control all aspects o£ network configurations, including, withoJt limitation, the mode of telecou..dnication'networking, the teleco~nunicaticr~s carrier, the sequence of staticr~ and the method for delivery of rile O~line Processes. The telecommunication network furnished by OCLC shall include and terminate with a required modern(s) on the premises of Participant. Such ~odem(s), including all modern(s) installed by OCLC under any preceding agreement between Participant and OCLC, and still in place on the effective date hereof, are owned by O(ZC. Upon expiraticn or termination of this Agreement for any teasoff, the modern(s) will be returned to OCLC by Participant. Risk of loss or damage to moderns will remain with O(ZC except for loss or damage resulting from willful acts or gross negligence by Participant. Participant shall not make any changes or add any attachments to the telecommmicaticm%s system as arranged by O(31C. 2. CX~C will provide dial-up access to the OCLC System through direct, long distance dialing, and through ~"Z~E~ and ~%qET (or, at OC~C's optics, other equivalent value-added or other networks which, in OC~C's teastreble opinion, are more advantageous to CLSA participants generally). ~oth 3~ and 12~ ~PS speeds will be mmde available. 10 71 OCLC85~212:01 NFP (3LSA: Shared Cataloging Technical Support to Participant OCLC will provide: 1. Training of personnel in the operatim of the O~line Processes and Offline Products to be furnished hereunder. 2. All reasormble, continuing, technical assistance to Participant, including the provisicm of a toll-free telephone contact with OCLC which Participant my use during all hcura of O(LC System operatio~. 3. Field and workshop training of perscrulel of Participant in new subeystems. 4. Technical bulletins, instructio~ mnuals, and other specialized docu~entaticn and updates which O~C makes available for use by OCLC participants generally. 5. Assistance to Participant to assure the accuracy of all forms, purchase orders, cc~ltracts and other documents required by OCLC to initiate and provide Online Processes and Offline Products and Services hereunder, including a cata/og profile and peck definitic~ table for Participant. O(~C/MARC Sub~criptic~ Ta~es During the term hereof, (XLC will rake available to Participant upon a sube~ipticm heals with orders placed in advance, and upo~ a schedule applicable to all O6LC par~icipents, copies in OCLC/MARC forzet, c$~ mgnetic tapes, of the catalog records of Participant vhich it has added to the O(LC On//ne Union Catalog, or to whiQh it has attached its OCLC-assigned holdings symbol, during the term hereof. OCLC rill also rake available to Partic/pent, dur~rx3 the term hereof, copies of the ;echiDe-readeble records of other OCLC participants who have giwn their ~itte~ consent to OCLC. O(LC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared CaCaloging G. Ne~ Processes~ Products and Services 6X~C agrees that as soo~ as it has ccelgleted development and testing, and is ready to release to its participants generally, new or enhanced Onlin~ Processes, Offline Products, OCLC Software and O6LC Services, the-same will be rode available to Participant hereunder, by addiCio~ to Appendix i hereto attached. The charges, terms and ccmdiCicr~ for such new and enhanced processes, products and services will be announced by OCLC and my be the subject of separate or supplementary agreements between the parties. Retrieml of Records by the State OCLC shall provide to the California Library Services Board ("CLSB"), on behalf of the State and at the expense of the State, copies of any or all of Participant's CLSA Data Base Program Records as requested by CLSB, as these records exist in OCLC's offline archive files at the time of the request, such records to be supplied in OCLC/MARC format. Said records sha/1 be furnished at such price(s) and on such terms and conditions as am agreed upon by O(LC and the State under the Memorandum of Understanding. I. Retrieval of Records by Participant OCLC agrees that during all periods of tzme when it is required to provide copies of CLSA Data Base Program Records to the CLSB under Article III-M ~, it will also offer to provide to Participant, cn one hundred twenty (l?J) days prior written notice to OCLC, any or all CLSA Data Base Program Records, as such records exist in O(~C's of~line archive files. Such records will be shipped on mgnetic tape, in OCLC/MARC format, with or withcut ccnsolidetim of transactions for each bibliographic record and with or without AACR2 lx~:essing, as ordered by Participant. Coet to 12 OCLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging Participant for the provisicn of theee records will be determined in accordance with Article V hereof, and will not exceed the charges rode to O(IC participants for retrieval of archive records and for tapes at the time of delivery thereof to Participant. Participant hereby conaents to allow copies-of any records and holding information input to the OC~C System by Participant, and constituting CLSA Data Base Program Records, to be furnished by OCLC to any and all other CLSA participants. ARTICLE IV - RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTICIPANT. A. Standards 'When accessing the OCLC System, Participant shall abide by standards set forth in Online System Biblicgraphic Input Standards, Second Edition (1982), as the same may be amended from time to time, and by other standards regarding use and operation of the OCLC System and/or the Online Processes adopted by (X~C from tim to time for application to OCLC participants generally. B. Current Catal~x3irK/ Participant agrees to search the OCLC Online Union Catalog in connection with all of its Current Cataloging, determining which of the ~talog records required for Current Cataloging are available therein, and to the extent not available therein, to create the records and insert them into the said Union Catalog by means of Shared Cataloging. Whether such catalog records are already available in the said Union Catalog or are created and inserted by Participant, Participant agrees that it will attach its O{LC-assigned holdings symbol to all catalog records in the OCLC Online Union Catalog required for Current Cataloging. PzDvidad that Participant has met its responsibilities under this Paragraph B, 13 OCLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging 'nothing herein shall prevent Participant from also carrying out ca~aloging by any other means it Nay elect. Participant agrees during the term of this Agreement to rainrain its holdings infor~etion in the (MZLC Online Union Catslog ih an accurate and up-to-date condition, and to inform OCLC prompt/y of any errors in catalog entries in the said Union Catalog which Participant is unable to correct online. C. Non-Member Services Participant agrees that it will not access the OCLC System to perform services or provide assistance for or on ~ehalf of any non-OCLC member except with the prior written consent of O(LC; provided, however, that such use for non-members is permitted (a) where it generates an inter-library loan request on the OCLC inter-library loan subsystem and (b) where an O(LC-auchorized processing center participant carries out Current Cataloging on behalf of its client users. D. Site Preparation Participant shall be responsible for site preparation for OOLC Terminals in accordance with specifications to be furnished by OCLC. E. Char~es Participant shall meke payment of 06LC charges heNunder in accordance with the requirements of Article V below. Terminal Printer Port Participant agrees that, except with 0CLC's prior writte consent, it will not o~tain rmt~mlog recDrds in roechine-readable form, by way of a terminal device or other device or means for accessir~ the 0CEC System, when Participant 's 0(LC-as~i~ned holdings symbol has not been attached to such records ~n the O(LC 0~ltne Unic~ Catalog, except In the following caM: 14 CCLC856212:01 NFP Shared Cataloging (i) Records required by Participant to carry out Current Cataloging or authorized retrospective ccmversic~ activities hereunder my be stored temporarily, prior to attachment of Participant's holdings sym~oI, as required by Participant's established work f/ow procedures; but no other use or transfer of such stored records shall be nBds prior to attachment of said holdings syn~)ol. (ii) Records my be o~tained and used by Participant in ccnnectl¢~ with its acqulsttl~ of new library materials provided (a) that the records are not transferred or made available to third parties other than the publishers or sup~liere to whom Participant 's purchase orders for such new neterials are issued: and (b) that Participant's OCLC-assigned holdings symbol is attached to all such records in the O~LC O~line Union Catalog reasonably promptly after receipt by Participant of the newly acquired materials. "' (iii) If Participant is a CLSA Cooperative Library System, 'records may be o~tained to which the OCLC-essigned holdings symbol of any membe~ of the CLSA Cooperative Library System has been attached, to carry out the authorized purposes of such system. G. AttachTents to and Use of the OCLC System a. Except as permitted in a separate agreement entered into between Participant and Of LC, Participant will not cause or permit any equipment or device to be directly or indirectly attached, /inked or used with the OCLC System except equipment and devices permitted under the OCLC Attachment~ Policy attached hereto as Al~endix-3 (as the ~ may be amended fran time to time on ninety (ge) days prior written notice by OCLC). 15 OCLC850212:01 NFP CL~A: Shared Cataloging b. No application or use of the OCLC System or O(IC Online Union Catalog not expressly permitted by this Agreement will be made by Participant without the prior written consent of OCLC. c. Any computer facilities or software programs provided by Participant for use with the O(~C System shall be without adverse effect cn the System. ARTICLE V - OCLC C~ARGESo A. Payments and Discounts Participant will pay O(LC the aggregate charges and rentals for access, processes, products, license and services furrfiehed by OCLC under this Agent, as provided in Appendix 1 hereto attached. Participant will be entitled to participate in the O(~C Subscription Discount Program as set forth in Appendix 2 hereto attached, earning the discounts referred to therein. Indices based on actual usage of processes, sales and rentals of products, licenses and services, and other amounts due, if any, will be rendered to Participant month/y. Statements will reflect the appropriate discount to which Participant is entitled by virtue of its participation in the aforesaid Subscription Discount Program. Net amounts due to O{LC after crediting subscription discount payments will be payable in accordance with the terms set forth in Appendix 1 and/or 2 hereto, and will include a ]ate payment service char~je, cc/~uted at the percentage rate shown therein, for amounts paid beyond stated terms. Any subeoription disc~tmt payment not credited a~ainat monthly indices, ~all~ at Participant'a ~ption, be refunded to Participant in rash on thirty (~) days prior written notice to O(~C. 16 OCLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging In the event of termination of this Agreement pursuant to Article XII OCLC will refund to Participant any subscription payment An excess of claims against such payment. B. ~ Modification of Charges and Discounts · - Of LC my reduce any charges provided for in this Agreement effective at any time, and may increase or add ne~ such chargas for existing processes, products and services, or change the form or method of charging, upon sixty-five (65) calendar days prior written notice to Participant, provided, however, that as to the following charges set forth on Appendix 1 hereto, no increase shall become effective prior to July 1, 1986: Display Holding $ .09 Search Charge (if applicable) $ .11 ILL Request $ 1.34 Password Annual Fee $ 48.00/year Annual Dial Access Authorization $288.00/year System Service Fee (dedicated terminal only) $ 26.5e/month Terminal Maintenance $ 43.00/mnth Training Fee - ~aived $ .00 When any m3dificatiaq in charges becomes effective pursuant to notice given, Appendix 1 and/or 2 shall be deemed to be amended provide for those modificaticns. If new processes, products, licenses or services are added to Appendix 1 to this Agreement, the charges applicable thereto will be deemed added at the same tim to Appendix 1. EICLE VI - TAXES. A. All charges set forth c~ Appendix i to this Agreement are exclusive of sales, use, excise and similar taxes which my be applicable to the transactions dealt with in this Agreement, all of which tames, tWether with interest and panaltiee theteen shall be for the account of Participant and reimbursed to C~C. Such taxes for which c/aims or 17 CX:LC85e212:01 NFP CZ.,SA: Shared Ca~.aloginc:j 'asseesffents could be made aga:i. nar.. O(:I.,C my be ac:lded t.o 'invoice8 ~o Parr. ic'ipanC un,less a valid exemp~j. cn certj.~icat..e has been ft,trn'ished to 0(:I,C by ~'art:'ici,Dant, P'ar~icj.pant., n'ay# at. j.t..8 cT,,,'n ex'LDerlse and in OCLCes Ilame# challenge or e~ak abatement or refund of taxes for which it is liable hereunder. OCLC ehall cooperate with Partialpant in that regard by providing all relevant inform rich that is available to O(ZC. Each party's obligation8 under this Article VI shall survive the expiration or - termination of this Agreement. B. Participant represents that it is exempt from the payment of Federal income tax. ARTICLE VII - USE AND TRANSFER OF RECORDS. Partic/pant shall be free, without restriction by OCLC, to use, copy, display and distribute, in any ~enner it my elect, (a} copies of all catalog records received or obtained by it which are not OCLC-Derived Records, and (b) copies of all OCLC-Derived Records received or obtaine~ by it during the term of this or any preceding agreement ~ith OCLC, and of all derivatiw ~orks rode therefrom, except that Participant agrees that it uill not permit cmline access to OCLC-Derived Records or derivative ~orks rode therefrom except to its end-user patrons and to other OCLC participants, and it vi//not permit the transfer of copies of OCLC-Derived Records or derivati%~ works made therefrce, in mchine-readable form, to third parties other than (i) CCLC participants: [ii) vendors from whom Participant acquires goods or services in transactions requiring such vendors to have access to Mid records or derivative ~orks, where such vendors have first signed and delivered to Participant an agreement in the form shcen on Api~ndix 4 hereto attached, restricting the subsequent use 18 OCLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Catalo~ing 'and transfer of such recoTds~ and (iii) nc~-OCLC participanta (other'than vendors referred to in clause (ii) abo~e), subject to prior negotiaticm by OCLC and Participant of mutually agreed terms and conditions. A copy of each agreemen~ between Participant and 1is vendors, required by clause (ii) abo~, shall be furnished to OCLC by Participant prompt/y following its executic~ by the parties. Notwithstanding the foregoing., it is agreed that in the event Participant is linked with other libraries which are not members of O(LC, in an c~line, autumted system, Participant shall be free to add its O(LC-Deri~ed Records to such system rot use in an online public access catalog and/or circulation system, provided that the system participants which are not O(LC participants do not exceed thirty (30) in nuzber and such participants have agreed with Participant and OCLC (and a cc~y has been furnished to OCLC) that the OCLC-Derived Records will not, withcut further agreerent with O(LC, be used for cataloging purposes or be transferred in mchtne-readsble form to third parties. Participant 's rights and obligatirns under this Article VII shall survive =he expiration or termination1 of this Agreement. ARTICLE VIII - WARRANTIES AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY. A. Catslog cards, OCLC/MARC subscription tapes a~d other Offline Products, except OCLC Terminals and O(LC Software, will, at the delivery thereof, be free of errors or defects caused by OCLC or its sul~liers. If any such products prove, within sixty (60) days after delivery to have bee~ defective or to have contained errors upon delivery, OCLC will either replace the item by reproducing it free of charcJe or, at OCLC's c~tim, by requiring new c~line transactlore by Participant wkth issuance of full credit. OCLC Terminals sold to Participant hereunder and 19 OCLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Ca~alc~Jing · OCLC Software lioensed to Participant are ~t~ as provided frum time to time in the standard form of CXZC terminal sale and software agreements. THE K)REGOING OBLIGATIONS AS SET ~OR~H OR REFERDqCED IN THIS ARTICLE VIII-A REPRESENT OCLC' S SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE LIABILITY FOR ANY DEFECT OR FAILURE IN-ONLINE P~O~ASES, OFFLINE PEODOC~S, OCLC SERVICES AND OCLC B. l~nediately prior to the delivery of all Offline Products sold or leased to Participant hereunder, CXIC will have good title thereto; and immediately prior to the delivery of cc~Dies of any OCLC Software to Participant hereunder, OCLC will have the right to extend to Participant the related license. C. (XIC shall maintain the OCLC System during the term hereof, and shall exert continuing efforts to upgrade the OCLC Online Union Catalog and to improve performance of the OCLC System. D. Except for the express warranties stated above in this Article VIII and the undertakings in Article IX helM, O(IC makes no express or implied representations or warranties with respect to the OCLC System, Online Processes, Offline Products, OCLC Services or OCZC Software. All other warranties, including the WARRANTIES OF MERCX~ANTAKILXTY AND FITNESS ~OR A PARTIOULAR USE ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED. OCLC SHALL NOT BE LIABLE ~OR INCXD~qTAL OR 0DNSEQ~qTXAL DAMAGES, EV~q XF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY THEREOF AND REGARDLESS OF THE MDRM OF ACTXOiq, NOR SHALL XT BE LIABLE ~OR EXE/~LARM DAMAGES OR LOST REVENUES. In ~he event tJmt the exclusivi~y or limitation of liabiliDy or remedM set forth above is held to he unenforceable for any mason, then CXlC's total liability to Participant in respect of any claim, regardless of t~e form of ac'cion, shall not exceed ~he velue of all transac~ic~s under ~his Agreerant for three (3) preceding the incident giving rise to such 20 81 CX~C850Z12:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging ARTICLE IX - INFRINGEMENT UI~DERTAKINGS AND GRANT OF LICE2qSE. A. By OCLC OC~C agrees to defend and assume all of Participant 's liability, cosL~ and expensee for any ~uit or claim brought or asserted against Participant on the ground that the Online Processes, Offline Products, OCLC Services or OCLC Software, as furnished by OCLC, infringe any patent, copyright, trademark, secrecy or other proprietary interest of third parties, provided and upon the conditions that Participant (i ) promptly deliver to OCLC written notice of any claim of such infringement together with all infringement notices and other papers received by Participant and (i~) give OCLC all information and assistance reasonably requested, together with exclusive authority to investigate, settle and defend such claim. THE FOREC~D!NG SETS FORTH OCLC'S ENTIRE LIABILITY TO PARTICIPANT FOR ANY ACTUAL OR ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OF THE TYPES DEALT WITH 'T. s ART c. -' B. By Participant Participant agrees to defend and assume all of liability, co~ts and expenses for any suit or claim brought or asserted against OCLC on the ground that any information or data entered into the O(LC Online Union Catalog by Participant, including any use, reproduction or transfer thereof by OCLC or its designees, infringes any copyright, trademark, secrecy or other proprietary interest of third parties, provided and upon the conditions that O(LC (i) promptly deliver to Participant written notice of any claim o£ .uch infringement, together with all infringement notices and ot~er papers received by OCLC and (ii) give Participant all info~ntion and assistance resscmah~,, --~uested, tc~Jether with exclusive authority to investigate, settle and defend such claim. THE 21 0(ZC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging EDRESOING SETS fORTH PARTICIPANT' S MIRE LIABILITY TO Of ZC fOr ANY ACTUAL OR ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT OF THE TYPES DEALT WITH IN THIS ARTICLE IX-B. C. License Grant Participant hereby grants to OCLC, other OCLC participants, non-participant users and designees a non-exclusi%~, royalty-free right to copy, display, publish, prepare derivative works from, distribute and use (including, without limitation, use in forming new compilations of information) all biblicgraphic records, holdings and other information supplied to OCLC during the term of this Agreement by Participant or any entity acting on its behalf, under any copyright, patent, secrecy or-other proprietary right therein owned or controlled by Participant. De Survival of Riqhts and Obligations Participant 's and OCLC's rights and obligations under this Article IX shall survive any expiration or termination of this Agreement. ARTICLE X - PaZPCNSIBLE USE. Participant agrees to ccmply with any code of responsible use adopted by 06LC for OCLC participants ulx~ the recommendation of the OCLC Users Council, and to act in the use of the OCLC System, the Online Processes and Offline Products with good faith and loyalty to all other CCLC participefits, doing nothing tO waste, diminish or cause harm to the shared beneficial intent of such other participants in O(ZC. It is a duty of OCLC participan~s to act cooperat/vely with each other-and to avoid practices which have the effect either of shifting the burden of payment for OCLC products and services away fran those receiving the same, or 22 (XLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging mnipulating use of ~he OCLC System in ways which unreasc~ably and adversely affect its performahem. The following practices are examples of violations of the duty of responsible use: (i) Creating duplicate records in the O(LC Online Catalog, whether as a result of failing to search fully before doing original input, in order to reflect local bibli(x3raphic informaticm, in order to avoid the First Time Use charge, or otherwise. (ii) Use of the save file as an electronic mail system. (iii) Doing Current Cataloging or reclassificaticn cataloging under a retrospective ccnversio~ authorization. (iv) -Placing multiple inter-library loan requests o~ o~e inter-library loan work form. ARTICLE XI - [ORCE MAJEURE. Neither party shall be liable for any failure or de/ay in performance hereunder (other than of an obligatic~ to pay money) due to or resulting fran any cauM beyc~d its reasonable control including, but not limited to acts of God, aces of the other party~ strikes, shortage of mterials, actions of government, fire, adverse weather calditic~s or operatic~al failure, provided that the party so affected notifies the other promptly of the coenencement and nature of the cause, the corrective steps to be taken and the est/mmted duration of the delay. ARTICLE XlI - TERM AND TERMINATION. A. Subject to the balance of this Article XII, this Agreement shall rsmain in effect indefinitely, until terminated by either party entirely in its o~n di~cretic~ and for any reason whatsoever, upon not less than ninety (9e) day's prior written notice to the other. 23 O~LC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging B. This Agreement sha/1 terminate autcmatic~lly, ninety (9~) days after receipt by O(LC frcm Participant or from the State of written notice that Participant is no lo~ger a CESA participant. C. This Agreement is subject to termination by OCLC upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to Participant in the event of any cancellaticm or termination of the Memorandum of Understanding. D. Whenever either party believes that the other has cc$~nitted a breach of any material obligatico under this Agreement, it my give the other notice to that effect with reasonable spacificity. The other party shall use its best efforts promptly to remedy any breach and shall keep the party giving notice informed of the nature of the remedial acticm planned and taken, or will respood to the notice, with an exp/anaticm of the reasons it believes that no breach has occurred. When a party in mterial breach has not corrected same or is not diligently taking necessary corrective acticm within twenty (20) days after notice of such breach, which actioR will enable the party to cure the breach within a reasonable time, or if the party beccxnes insolvent, is the subject of a petiticm filed under any chapter of the Bankruptt7 Act and not withdrawn within sixty (6~) days or if a receiver is appointed for all or part of a party's property, the the other party shall be entitled to seek apprc~riate relief under this Agreement and under applicable law, which relief inc/udes, without limitstim, terminatim of this Agreement by written notice, without liability therefor. Notwithstanding the tDrovisic~s of Paragraph D above, if Participant fails to issue payment within ten (10) business days after receipt of notice frcm o(ZC of noR-payment of charges due and t~myable under this Agent and not ~ly in dispute, O(LC my termirmte the 24 0CLC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloglng Agent by notice in writing effectiv~ at any time after the end of those ten (10) days and prior to receipt of the/ate payment, without liability for such termination. F. . Whenever any mterial obligation of either party under this Agreement is postponed or de/ayed pursuant to the provisions of Article XI above for hum than ninety (90) c6nsecutive days, then the other party my give notice of termination of this Agreement, effective thirty (30) days after such notice, unless by such date the cause of the delay has been removed and perfornance of the delayed obligation has been resumed. ARTICLE XIII - ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement my not be assigned by either party, in wbole or in part, without the express, prior, written consent of the other, except that assignment may be rode by OCLC, withcut such cament, to any wholly-owned subsidiary of O(LC or to any entity acquiring substantially all of the assets of OCLC, provided that (i) the assignee affirnatively undertakes to Participant to comply with all obli~atia~ of O(LC hereunder, and (ii) such assignment shall not release OCLC from its prirary obligations to Participant. Subject to the foregoing sentence, this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of each party hereto. ARTICLE XIV - NOTIr~-~. Any notlces, desired or rBguired to be giwn by either party pursuant to this Agreerant, sha/1 be in writing and sha/1 be deetrod sufficient if deliared by hand or if sent by certified rail, roturn receipt requested, to tbe address of the other party set forth below or to such other address as has been furnished by means of a notice giwn in accordance with this Article: 25 CLSA: Shared Ca~aloging President OCLC Onl/ne Computer Library Center, Incorporated 6565 Fran=z Road Dublin, Ohio 43e17 Wi~h a ~ sent by r~Ju]ar U.S. rail to: Vice President and Corporate Counsel OCLC Online Ca~uter Library Center, 6565 FranCz Road Dublin, Ohio - 43e17 Incorporated If ~o Par~cicipant: ARTICLE XV - I~/SCELLANKXJS. A. Effec~ of Waiver The waiver or failure of eiCher par~y to exercise in any respect: any right provided for in this Agreement shall not be deemed a vatvet of any further or future right under this Agreerant. B. Eeadir~s Paragraph and Article headings are included in this Agreemen= for c~ven~ence c~ly and are no~ deemed to be a par~ of this Agreemen=. C. AP~li,-ble Law Th~s Agreement s~all be governed b~, subjec~ to, and construed according to ~e laws of ~e SM=e of Celifornia. D. OrtcJtrmls Tht8 Agreenmnt is executed In ~ (2) elgned counterparts, each of which is and shall cc~e~L~u~e an ortgtrml hereof. Entire A~reement tX,~O~ZI2 :el NFP Shared Cataloging ~his Agreement is the ~inal, --~o~p-lete and exclusive statement of the agreement of the parties with respect to the subject mstter hereof. No provision of this Agreement my be changed, modified, or supplemented e~cept by a writing signed by both parties, unless othervise provided for'herein. I~, at the effective dmte hereof, an O(~C membership agreewrit is in effect between O(ZC and Participant, such agreenent shall terminate sinultanecusll with the effectiveness of this Agreenent. In such event, all rights and liabilities of the ~srties under the preexisting nen~ership agreement shall be deened to have arise~ under this Agreenent and shall be enfo_~r~eable in accordance with the ternB hereof. IN WITNESS MEREOF, the un~ersigne~, being duly authorized# cn behalf of the ~arties, their successors and assigns, have executed this Agrz=Tent effective the ]ast date belo~ ~ritten. · WITNESS: ...... C(ZC O~LINE C0~0TER LIBRARt ;- CE~ER, INO0~CRATED Date WITNESS: Tit/e (NAI~ OF PARTICIPANT) Date Title 27 OCLC CK~RGES: ~PPENDZX 1 OCLC PACIFIC - OnZ~ne CataZog~ng - ~apeload~ng - Partia~ Users PART I Section A Section C Section E Section G Section N PART II Section A Section 6 PART 111 Page Access to the OCLC Systems AI-Z Footnotes A2 Onltne CatriDging Sl Offline Cataloging Cl-Z Footnotes [ntert ibrsry Loan 01 Union Listing E1 Termine~ & ~o~ks~ation Produc~s ~ Services ~1-6 Footnotes F6 Retrospective Conversion G1 Internationat Access Reference Services A1-55 Ccxnpact Discs A1 EPIC Databases A2-~5 FirstSearch A4,6-51 ContentsAtert A52 MisceLLaneous A53 lntern~tior'.mL Access - EPIC ASk lnterr~ttionat Access - FirstSearch AS5 Software Products 656-57 OCLC SiteSearch 656 OCLC Gateray 957 OoctJ~entation 1-6 Footnote 6 Issued Aptit 27, lq~4 CODE DIAL CON CON CON CON CON AUT AUT PRODUCT ACCESS 6031 Dia/-Access Connect Charge-CompuServe (I) $0.125 per rain. S7.50 per kr. 6056 Dial-Access Conne~t'Charge-OCLC HUB (1) S0.125 per ntin. S7.50 per 6052 100 DieJ-Access Hourly Con~ct Charge C2) $(3,17 per rain. S 10.20 per kr, 6053 Direct-DiAl A,:cess to Dublin, Ohio $(30.035 per m~. $2. t0 per kr. 6233 Canadian Dial-Access Charge - CompuScrve (3) $(3. I9 per rain. Sl 1.40 per 6051 Diai-Acccss Authorization (4) $220.00 Pet yr. 6050 Dial-Access Authorization--Selective User (4) $65.00 per yr. · i_~ces_- to the OCLC Sy-t~au Part 1, Section A, Page 1 APPENDIX 1 OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC Oaliae C&uJoE~ng - Tapeloading - Putial User Effective ~uly !. 1994 ONLINE CAT AND TAPELOADERS PARTIAL USER S0.15 per min. $9,00 per kr. S0, 15 per rain. $9.00 per ~. ~0. li per rain, $[0.10 ~r ~. ~.038 ~r ~. $2.28 ~r ~. $315.00 peryr. INTERNET ACCES~ CON 6082 Internal A~cess MULTIDROP DEDICATED ACCESS RCA 6801 System Access Fee RCA 6801 System Access Fee - 2*Terminais RCA 61 [ I Network Service Fee RCA 6113 Communjutions Controller 4~-Pon Access Fee RCA 6114 Communications Controller i-Port Access Fee TELECOMMUNICATIONS LINKING PROGRAM CrLP) ACCESS RCM 6106 TLP Network Facilities Fee NRC 6099 TLP Installation Charge RCA 6800 System Access Fee - TLP RCA 6800 System Access Fee - TLP - 2*Terminals TLP Connect Charge: (Hours/Month) 6093 TLP Cormact Minutes (I-5(X) Hours) CON 6094 TLP Connect Minutes (SOI-I,CX30 Hours) CON 6095 TLP Connect Minutes (1,001-5,000 Hours) CON 6096 TLP Connect Minutes (5,001-10,000 Hours) CON 6097 TLP Connect Minutes (10,001 & Over Hours) SEARCHING SBL 0131 SBL 0211 SBL 0431 SBL 073 ! SER CX~2 SER 021~, SER 0314 SBC 0961 SCN 004~ SCN 0150 SCN 0315 SCN 0016 SBL 9293 SBL 9359 CCA 9355 Cata~ogLqg Searches. Except Keyword Searches Recon Searches, Except Keyword Searches ILL Searches, Except Keyword Searches Seriah Searches. Except Keyword Searches Cata]oging Keyword Searches Recon Keyword Searches ILL Keyword Searches Search Cre4tit for Searches Over Scan Title-Cate.ioging Scan Title--Recon Scgn Tide-ILL Scan TiUe--UL PRZSM Bgsics TraL'~g Metergab Keyword Searching Trah~g Materials Authorities Phrase Searching Trainj~g Materials PROFILE PROCESSING CCA 1030 Catalog Cud CCA 1031 Cataloggag Prorde Change CCA 1032 Tape-Only Pmrde NL 404l U~on ListaLL-Only Prorde .,4S 9(XX) OCLC Paci~c Travel Fee INS 9011 Start-up [nstru,:tion Training and Follow-up Support Services INS 90[ 1 Start-up Instruction Selective pet rain, $ 4,20 per ~. S155.00 per dad. terminal/too. $118.00 per dad. terminal/too. $I15.(X) per dad. mo<lem/mo. $40.00 per corn controller/too. $.50.00 per corn controUer/mo. $920.00 Chartea very (S) $t55.00 $1t8.00 (6) $0.065 $0.022 (7) $(3.53 $0.~3 (T&l) ($0.0~) (9) $(3.13 (9) $(3.13 (9) $(3.13 (9) $(3.13 S20.00 S20.00 $20.00 SS5.00 $ t 10.00 (tO) $85.00 Charges vary (ll) $6CX).00 (It) $403.00 $150.00 per TLP line/me. per vL'~'ual c~rcuitYmo. per vLnual ci.rcuit/mo. per rain. $3.90 per ~r. per rain. $3.30 per hr. per u,jn. :$2.64 per hi. per rain. $l .98 per hz. per uLia. $1.32 per hr. initial charges per subsequent incident S0. I0 per rain. S6.00 $638.00 per dad. tcrminaYmo. $0.54 S0.54 $0.54 $0.54 $0.85 $0.85 SO.iS ($0.08) $0.14 $0.14 [s~uc,:l A~.HI ~,,. t9~4 per SOF SOF RCM NRC CODE PRODUCT MISCELLANEOUS ACCESS CHARGES 9302 OCLC PASSPORT_Soft>were License w/User Guide $39.00 9303 OCLC Gateway Software - License Fee 9304 OCLC Gateway SoFtware - MaintenLqce Fee 6115 On-site Co~ultinj for Telecommunicetions $;~0.00 *Access Products Access to the OCLC System Part I. --~-jon A. Peg,= 2 APPENDIX I OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC O"xine Cauloging - Tapuloading - Partial User Effective July I, 1994. ONL[NE CAT AND TAPELOADERS See Pare II Price List SEE Pa~ II Price Lisz (1) Within the United States vim CompuServe, OCLC Network, or approved US PDN gatewmys. (2) Avegable to United States users outlids !oca/ceUing rings of CompuSe~e, OCLC Network, or approved PDN gateway. Available in herto Rico end Hawaft but not in Alaska. (3) Charge levied on all dial-access tra tllc originating in Canada. See Section H, Pert I. (4) Prorated during the year L~or new users; bi~ed annually in July ~'or current users. (J) Charges/or single institution TLP only. (6) Charges for multiple institution TLP only. (T) Excludes :uthority rde searches. (8) Atl searches are charged. A cred;e is applied to uch search over 15.000 per toorob, including keyword setrchea. (9) Excludes 'Gobeck' co,--,--.ds. (1 0) For the establishment ore four-character group symbol for Union List, Group A,:cess Cepabi/it,/, end Group Access CapebilLy/Union List groups or for the usip. ment oLr e new three-character group symbols for ILL end Union List-only participants. (11) Ptus travel expenses bi//ed under corresponding product code. PARTIAL USER 91 CODE PRODUCT FLRST TIME PRODUCE/1jPDATE ONT 2500 OnJi~e Cata~ogLng PrLme (1) $0.50' ONT 2~50 OnJL, lc Catalog~ N~nprime $0.40 ONR 3350 O~L~e Retrospective Conversion PrLme (1) ONR 3355 OnJi~e Retrosp~:tive Conversion NonprLme $0.27 CP,~D[TS (2) ONT 2572 CONSER MaL'~terumce Credit ($8.00) ONT 2572 USNP Credit ($2.00) AST 1065 Onli~e Ortgiz~l bsput Credit - Conset AST 1067 Ori~tnnl L~put Credit Conset - New ($8.00) A~T 1067 USNP Oriliz~ Lnput Credit C$3.65) AST 1063 Onli~e OtiJLnzl bput Cred~ o Work[otto ($3.65) ,~ST 106~ Onl~e OtigL, m[ hput Credit - New ($3.65) ONT 2571 E.'~aace Credit TOC 3491 MiaLme]-level Record Uplrede Credit (3) ($2.00) ONT 2565 Database EAtichme~t Credit (4) OTC 1071 OnlL~e Holdings Deletion Credit (S0.3~) Online Cataloglag Part I, Section B, Page I APPENDDC I OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC Onli~e Ca~ogiag - Tap~loadlag - PertieJ U~,-r Effective July !. 1994 ONLINE CAT AJ~D TAPELOADERS PARTIAL USER MISCELLANEOUS ONL[NE CATALOGLNG DSH 3562 Holdings Display Use S0.34 MLE ~91 P~S~ Ex~ (5) ~.075 CCD 93~ CAT ME Plus Licen~ (~cludes mM~) $395.~ ~AT C~ SO~ ~D DATIVE $UBSC~IONS ~mpl~ ~c~F w~ch ~clud~ ~m~ d~, ~m m&w~e, d~umea~a, ~d CBT: CCD 6~0 Geneta~ CoUect~on :r~lo.oo per CCD 6~41 Recent Books $310.00 per CCD 6342 Older Books end Most Used Non-books $310.00 pet CCD 6343 LC Name end Subject Aut~orltles Only $310.00 per CCD 6344 Law $5 lO.O0 per CCD 6345 Medical $5 lO.O0 per CCD 6346 Music $510.00 per CCD 63?0 Hispanic S510.00 per Additional Subsets which include biblioSraphic oompect disc(s) only: Genera~ Collection Add'l Sub Recent Books Add'l Sub Older Books end Mo~ U~,d Non-books Add'l Sub Law Add'l Sub Medicnl Add'l Sub ~v[usic Add'l Sub Hispanic Add'l Sub CCD 6440 CCD 644 l CCD 64-.~2 CCD ~ ~ CCD 6445 CCD 6~6 CCD 644.7 (!) C2) S385.00 $280.00 $280.00 $385.00 $385.00 $385.(30 $385.00 Prime t~me hours: 9:00 e.m. to 5:00 p.m. Easter~ Time, Monday t~oug~ Friday. A~ Crediu to be earned end used with~ OCLC's r~:el year e~d applied agair,~ cata~og~ng activit~ only. Excludes librar~ schools and Major MicroForms nativity. (3) (4) per per per per per per Applicable on addition of ¢lautCs~atioo number. table of contents. or subject hendin8 on PRISM service. Not applicable to CIP physical description information (Geid 300) record enh~ncemenM. bcludes export of bibliogrsph]¢ end authority records th~oug.~ PRISm! Mrvice end CAT ME Plus. (5) $0.71 S0.57 $0.57 $0-31 ($0.53) $0.45 $0.105 S395.00 year year year year year year year year year year year year year year b~ued April 2'7. 19~t CODE PRODUCT OFFLINE CATALOGING CCA lSOt Accessions Lisu 140 Items or Less - 14! Items or More CCA 1SiR Changes CCA 1001 Cata/o8 Cards CCA I01 i Cetajog Cards Retuns and Adj CCA 26T7 OaTline Return Catalo8 Cards CCA 102 1 Out of Warrant,/Card Rerun TAPELOADING/ELECTRONIC BATCH SERV/CE TAP 3910 Electronic Data Exchange Annusl Fee TAP 3812 OCLC-derived Records TAP 3813 Original Records Processed Under 3812 TAP 39 11 Tapeload---Currcrzt Sin81e Lrtstitution TAP 3931 Tapeload--Current Group TAP 3981 Tapeload S~.hold Raro Cat TAP 3983 Tapelad Retro Group Cat TAP 3971 Original Records Processed Under (3911/3931/398 I) TAP 3915 Tepelo~d Deletes TAP 3935 Group Tapeload Deletes TAP 3921 lnitia/Tape Evgluation TAP 3922 Initia/Tape Evaluaeion - Extra Hours TAP 6046 Tepeloadin8 Aceass Fee-Dial Acceu & L, tternet TAP 680,1 Tapeloading Aceus Fee-Multidtop & TLP MLE 2127 OCLC-MARC Tapeload Output MLE 2131 1600 B.P.I. Media Charge MLE 2133 6250 B.P.I. Media Charge OCLC-MARC SUBSCR. LPTION SVC/ELEC MARC SVC MLE 2067 Electron/c MArC Annual Fee MLE 2031 Sample Tape MLE 2011 16430 B.P.I. MARC TAPE MLE 2071 MARC TAPE DUP 16430 B.P.L MLE 2013 62~0 B.P.I. MARC TAPE MLE 2073 MARC TAPE DUP 62~ B.P.I. MLE 2007 MARC Record Copying Charge MLE 2051 Changes in MARC Subscription Ptorde MLE 20,17 Electron~c MARC Service Ptocusin8 Charge GOVERNMENT PR/NT[NG OFFICE DOCUMXNT (GOVDOC) TAP 2650 Record Retricva/and Setholdings MLE 2676 MARC Record Copying Charge MLE 2661 1600 B.P.I. Media Charge MLE 2663 6250 B.P.I. Media Charge CCA 2655 Catalog Cards TAP 2U3 Item ~tion Pmrdc T~ 2659 F~e C~ge R~u~ OfTline Cazaloging Part I. ~_~'_io~ C. Page I APPENDIX 1 OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC Online Cua~oging - TeprJoading - Portia/User Effective July I. 1994 ONLZNE CAT AND TAPELOADERS PARTIAL USER (1) (3) $30.80 minimum K).22 per item ~5.00 per incidgnt S0. I3 per card S0. 13 per card S0,13 per card S75.00 per incident r/.20.O0 per,w. SO.40 ~.09 pet record proeeseed S0009 per record processed ~.09 per record processed (S0.24) SO.16 S0.16 S0.16 $0.57 (~.7T) S0.11 $0.11 $0.11 $0.11 (S0.26) (4) (S) (S0.C~) (S0.09) S~)0.00 up to 10 bouts S~3.00 ~ additions] hour S550.00 per yr. (S0.11) (SO. it) (6) (~) (8) (9) (l~ $100.00 per month S0.07 per record $15.00 per tape $30.00 per ~ape $110.00 peryr. $80.00 per tape $35.00 per tape $35.00 per tape $50.00 per tape S0.07 per record S45.00 pet incident ~5.00 per month S0.14 per tide :K).07 per record 115.00 per tape 130.00 per tape S0.13 per card ~00.00 ~5,00 per request $0.17 :$0.16 [uued April .2'7. lgq, I JCODE PRODUCT MAJOR MICROFORM SETS TAP 395! Record Retrieval sad Setholdings TAP 3952 Record Retrieval and-Set. holdings sad Customized Call Number TAP 3961 Nonmember Processing Fee CCA I05! Catalog Cards ML1E 2107 MARC Record CopyLng Charge ML.I~ 2111 1600 B.P.L Media Charge OF CUMULATED LOCAL DATABA.~ES MLE 2151 Se~-up Fee pet D-"' Range MLE 2141 MARC Records Selected-Batch Service MLE 2161 MARC Records Selccted-Online Sm'vicc MLE 2171 AACR.2 Conversion MLE 2181 MARC Record Consolidation MLE 2Z31 16430 B.P.L Media Charge MLE 2133 6~_S0 B.P.I. Media Charge OUT--OF-W~ MARC RECORDS MLE 2061 Set--upFee MLE 2081 MARC Records Selected NiLE 2131 16430 B.P.I. Media Charge '~,ILE 2133 6250 B.P.I. M-,:dia Charge ( 1 ) Shipping billed separately. Ofllinc Cmaloging Part I. Section C. Page 2 APPENDEX 1 OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC On/inc Cataloggag - Tapeloading - Partial User Effective July i. ONLINE CAT AND TAPELOADERS Cl) $0.14 per tide $0.2 i per title PARTIAL USER S0.17 $0.23 (7) (~) (tO) (ll) (1) ~5.00 per sa f~).13 per cud $0.07 per record S15.00 per tape S30.00 per tape S1,CX30.00 per institution S0.13 per record selected :50.06 per record cr~a~ed $0.0~, per record converted $0.03 per MARC record selected per PC 2161 S15.(~ per tape $30.00 per tape $100.00 per frequency S0.05 per record II5.00 per tape $30.00 per tape S45.00 per set $0.16 (2) Annual fee is billed at sign-up and atmiversa~ date. Applies to both Electronic Batch and Electronic MARC Service. (3) Original records added to OCLC database receive credit equal to proceuing charge plus an additional credit. (4) Holdings deleted from the OCLC database receive credit equal to processing charge under preduct code 39 15 for hold~g deletions. (5) Per atmual Dial-Acccu Authorization/Interact account applicable to each tapeloader account when on.tint catsloging and original cataloging units total less than 1 .CXX) per 6-month billing period. (6) Per tcrmLnal charge applicable to each tapeloader account when onlinc cataloging uttits total less than 1,0(X} per 6-month billing period. (7) A 50~ price dis~ount will be applied to all records when records per proceuing period (i.e., daily. weekay. bi-weekay. monthly. quarterly. sad semi-annually) excee~t 50,000 records. (8) Charge includes cost of tape. procauing. and handling. (9) Ptoceuing for F, Ic dalivery. (10) Records created based on holdings set or origmal cataloging from all tapeload. Major Microform. GOVDOC, or other hatch products. ( I I ) Records created based on holdings set or original cataloggag from oaline cataloging. reclassiGcation. or retrospective conversion. b. surxl April 2'7.19~M CODE PRODUCT INTERI. LBRARY LOAN OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC ILL 4~01 ILL 4502 ILL 4511 IDH 3581 OTC 4561 IDH 3611 UNL 4433 1 OOF 453 l OOF 4.$41 OOF 4558 MAa~ 9361 OTO 93~0 (I) Rcquuu ILL Loan Review Is'RISM Reru,-~Is Holdings Display Use Lending Credit UL Holdings Display Use UL/ILL.---Group Membership Statistics Report Annual Foe Statistics Reports Per Page Local Control Data Notice ILL ME Plus License (includes PRISM ILL Training Materials (2) (3) Interlibrary Loan Pan !. _~-:__'_,ion D. Page I APPENDIX ! Online Cataloging - Tapeloading - Partial User Eftcalve July i. 1994 ONLINE CAT AND TAPELOADERS (1) (2&3) 10.,il S0.41 10.41 (5o.;~) 10.29 $2~ s~.~ per symbol Postage only charge $395.00 $20.00 per package Charge to profile existing three-character symbols into Union List, Group A;cess Capability, or Group Access/Union List iraups. See PC 4041, Section A, for/our-character group symbol assipment charge, Shippin8 billed sepustely. Annual lee is billed et sign-up end e,,tniversary date. PARTIAL USER I0.55 I0.55 I0.55 I0.45 $0.39 $395.00 $a0.00 Ieeued April ,~7.19"~$ CODE PRODUCT UNION LIST Union Listing Part !, Section E. Page 1 APPENDIX I OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC Online Cata~oging - TapeZo&ding - Partin/Us~t Effective July I. 1994 ONLINE CAT AND TAPELOADERS PARTIAL USER UNL 4101 LDR Update Credit-UL Agent UNL 4~361 LDR Ul:N:iate Crcclit:Full Authority UNL 40 i I LDR Creation-UL Agent UNL 4081 LDR Creation-Full Authority UNL 4031 UL/ILL--Group Membetsltip UNL 4021 LDR Storage Pet Year IDH 3571 Hold~gs Display Use IDH 360I Union List Holdings Display SUL 4198 Union List Confirmation Notice TOC d,0'22 LDR Deletion Credit (l) (3) (~0.3-t) ($0.53) ($0.3-t) No Charge No Charge S'LS.00 per symbol $0.03 $0.29 $0.39 Postage only charge ($0.3~) ($0.53) OFFLINE LISTS (Paper or Fiedse) SUL 4201 per title SUL 4211 per SUL 4221 per SUL 4231 per SUL 4241 per SUL 425 1 per SUL 435 1 per SUL 4361 per SUL 4371 par OFFLINE LISTS ~UL 4401 par SUL 4.~ ! I per SUL 4-t21 per SUL 4~51 par OFFLINE LISTS SUL 4380 SUL 438 i SUL 4382 SUL 4383 SUL ~3~ SUL ~385 summary holdlags statement copy-speci.fic holdings states i~dex entt~ optional field or cross-reference prOted page or~ginni fiche fiche copy mas~er fiche (T~E) summary holdings statement copy-spe:ific holdings statem~-tt (Single CD Dazaba.~) Mi.~tmum order of 25 packages or les~ Quantity orders of 26-~0 pack. ages Quantity orders of 5t-ICX3 packages Quantity orders of Z01-200 packages Quantity orders of 201-500 packages Quantity orders of 50 t +packages OFFLINE LISTS (Multiple CD DaUba.~s) SUL 4386 Minimum order of 25 packages or less SUL ~.387 Quantity orders of 26-$0 packages SUL 4389 Quantity orders of 25 1 - 100 packages SUL 4390 Quantity orders of 101-200 packages SUL 439 1 Quantity orders of 201-.500 packages SUL 4392 Quantity orders of S01+packages SUL 4395 SULOP CD Reorder Set-up Fee STANDARD TAPELOAD - UNION LIST TAP 3941 Tapeload Setholdings--par record read TAP ~051 LDR Creation SUL 42S1 Reporu par primed page (3) $0.Cr24 $0.013 $0.0'24 $0.013 $0.002 $-t.75 $0.33 $30.00 $0.036 $0.013 59.975.00 $399 S329.00 $269 $229.00 $199.0(3 (3 $3,250.00 S130.CX) $tlS.O0 S95.00 S80.~ $~S.~ S5(X).~ (l) No Charge $0.075 flat tea par copy per copy per copy par copy par copy flex fee per copy per CD per copy par CD par copy par CD per copy par CD per copy per CD per subsequent order (1) Charge to prordc existing three-character symbols into Union List. Group Access Cepabiltty. or Group A~ce-u/Union List groups. See PC 4~41. Section A, for symbol alE, resent charge. C2) B~ed semi-armua~ly, October and AprLI. (3) Postage billed separatcly. (4) SULOP extraction is additional cost. See PC 4..K)l--4-t$1, Section E. (S) Additional charges apply for multiple CD databases. $0.11 [ssur~ A~.ril ~ 14X;s.s Terminal and W'orkstation Products and Service~ Workstation ProducU/Majntenancg Part [. Section F. Page l APPENDIX l OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC Oal~ C-'aloging - Tape, loading - Puthi U~r Effective July I. 1994 WORKSTATION PACKAGES AL~ woricstation packages in~'!ude the appropriate system unit ~ad monitor end the following additior~ items: I dial access mcxlem cable, I satin/printer cable. enhanced PC keyboard. mouse. PC-DOS. 9f~ndows. OCLC PASSPORT software and ternplates, DOS User's Guide, Worlutation User Guide. 3 blaa.k diskettes. up to 60 ft. chaiaing or data cable. delivery, txutaUation, and I year on-site lim~tcct warranty. OCLC I/O Board. CODE PRODUCT WORKSTATION PRODUCTS,'MALNTENANCE OCLC M486sx,P25 Worir~ations WSN 9149 OCLC M486sx/2.~ Worksaden--Co[or Package (l) $1.685.00 80,~86sx 2~MHz Processor. 4MB RAM. Super Video Graphics Adapter (SVGA). SVGA Cotor Mottitor. 3.5' 1.4.~MB Dis~u:tte Drive, 120MR Hard Drive, two serial ports, one port. mad one mouse port. AST 9020 Time Payment Program for (2) PC 9149--M486s~olor 3 payments billed in let, 13th, and 25th mont~ after insu/larion. WSN 9147 OCLC M486sx/25 Base Unit, (1) $1.535.00 System unit with 80486sx 25MHz procesaor. 4ME RAM. Super Video Grapkics Adaplet (SVGA), SVGA Color Monitor, 3.5' 1 .,U, MB D~r. ettc Drive, 120MB Hard Drive. two serial ports. one parallel port. and one mouse port. Does not include oneire but&Hat/on. OCLC M-:86DX] Workstations WSN 9017 OCLC M486DXI Workstation--Color Package (1) $2.520.00 80986DX 33MHz proce:~r. 4MB RAM. Supor Video Graphics Adapter (SVGA). SVGA Color Monitor, 3.5" 1.44MB Diskette Drive. 120MB Hard Drive. two ser~ ports, one parallel port. Md one mouse port. 9008 TLmc Payment Program for (2) PC 9017--M486DX|--Color Package 3 payments billeel in let, 13th. ~ 25th month after installation. 9019 OCLC M486DXI Base U~t (1) S2.395.00 System Unit with 8C~86DX 33 MHz proccuor. 4MB RAM, Super Video Graphics Adapter (SVGA), SVGA Color Monitor, 3.5' | .d~ MB Diskerie Drive. 120MB Hard Drive. two set~l ports. one parallel port, m~d one mouse Does not include on-site installat~m. AST WSN ONLINE CAT AND TAPELOADER5 /payment 5928.00/payment PARTIALUSER Item Monitors SVGA Color SVGA Display Adapter Optional Wyse-based .orkstation M310 M38611 6 M386sx Product Product Product Code Price Code Price Code Price MON9200 $370 MON9200 $370 MON9200 $370 BRD9197 $125 BRD9197 $125 BRD9197 $125 Storage 40MB Hard Drive 120MB Hard Drive 5.25' 1.21rIB Drive 3.5' 1.44M6 Drive 250M8 Tape Backup Drive DRV9162 $300 DRV9162 $300 DRV9167 $215 NA NA NA NA DRV9160 $230 DRV9170 S70 DRV9170 $70 DRV9170 $70 DRV9169 S70 DRV9169 S70 DRV9169 170 DRV9216 8335 DRV9216 8335 DRV9216 8335 Memory 2ME SIMM Memory |4) 4MB SIMM Memory (41 4MB Memo.ry Board Products ( 3 ) Mlsce~aneous Serial/Parallel Adapter PASSPORT 2.1 Soltwafe M386sx125 Product Code Price Modems 14,4 bps Dial Access MON9200 4370 NA NA HItachi CDROM 6700 Drive w/case 6700 Drive wlo case 6700 Drive Internal DOS Extensions CD Caddies-PkO 5 Cat;lea 20ft. Data & ChaininO 30ft. Data & ChaininS 60ft. Data & ChaininS Extended Distance Renum Surchar9e Dial Access CC Adapter Additional Items: NA NA DRV9160 8230 DRV9170 S70 DRV9169 $70 DRV9216 $335 NA NA NA NA ADO9210 $85 AD09210 $85 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA BRD9217 $ 399 BRD9217 $ 399 NA NA NA NA BRD9211 $50 BRD9211 $50 BRD9211 SOF9302 $39 SOF9302 $39 SOF9302 $50 BRD9211 $50 S39 SOF9302 839 MDM7750 $520 MDM7750 S520 MDM7750 S520 CDP6267 8760 CDP6267 $760 CDP6267 $760 CDP6269 $420 CDP6269 S420 CDP6269 S420 CDP6270 $500 CDP6270 $500 CDP6270 $500 SOF9312 $24 SOF9312 $24 SOF9312 $24 CDP6324 $45 CDP6324 $45 CDP6324 CBL7761 $20 CBL7761 $20 CBL7761 $20 CBL7771 $25 CDL7771 $25 CDL7771 CBL7781 $40 CBL7781 $40 CBL7761 $40 CBE7801 $.3511t CBE7801 $,3511t C9E7801 $,3511t CBE7812 $,501lt CBE7812 $.5011t CBE7812 $,501ft CBL7821 $10 CBL7821 $10 CBL7821 $10 CBL7823 $15 CBL7823 $15 C9L7823 PC CBL7824 M3OOXT ComController Cable MDM7750 $520 CDP6267 $760 CDP6269 S420 CDP6270 $500 SOF9312 $24 CDP6324 845 CBL7761 CBL7771 $25 CBL7781 $40 CBE7801 $.351It CBE7812 $,501lt CBL7821 $10 CBL7823 Page. OCLC Pacific M486 Product Code Price MON9200 $37O NA NA NA' NA DRV9160 $230 DRV9170 $70 DRV9169 $70 DRV9216 $335 NA NA ADO9208 $145 NA NA BRD9211 $50 SOF9302 $39 MDM7750 $520 CDP6267 $760 CDP6269 $420 CDP6270 $500 SOF9312 CDP6324 CBL7761 $20 CBL7771 $25 C9L7781 $40 CBET801 k351ft CBE7812 $.5011t CBL7621 CBL7823 $15 ), Optional Workstation Products (6) M486sx125 M486DXI Product Product Item Code Price Code Price Page 3 OCLC Pacific Storage 170MB Hard Drive 5.25" 1.2MB Drive 250MB Tape Backup Drive Memory 4MB SIMM Memory |7) Software PASSPORT 2.1 Software Modems 14.4 bps Dial Access CDROM 6700 Drive w/case 6700 Drive w/o case IBM Internal DOS Extensions CD Caddies-Pkg 5 Cables 20ft. Data & Chaining 30ft. Data & Chaining 60ft. Data & Chaining Extended Distance Plenum Surcharge Dial Access CC Adapter DRV9220 9350 DRV9220 9350 DRV9222 9120 DRV9222 9120 DRV9225 9200 DRV9225 $200 ADO9190 9295 ADO9207 9295 SOF9302 939 SOF9302 939 MDM7750 9520 MDM7750 9520 CDP6267 9760 CDP6267 9760 CDP6269 9420 CDP6269 9420 CDP6266 9310 CDP6266 9310 SOF9312 924 SOF9312 924 CDP6324 945 CDP6324 945 CBL7761 920 CBL7761 920 CBL7771 925 CBL7771 925 CBL7781 940 CBL7781 940 CBL7801 9.351ft CBL7801 $.351ft CBL7812 9.501ft CBL7812 9.50lit CBL7821 910 CBL7821 910 CBL7823 915 CBL7823 915 Item Bose Unit Options Color Monitor Exp. CheuJe 2OMB Hard Drive 4OMB Herd Dive 72M8 Herd Dive 120MB Herd Dive | 50MB Herd Ddve Old Tape Backup New Tope Bockup CPU Upgemde Hitachi CD Ddve (ee.) Item Wofkmlelion and componenls Peripherals IBM CO Dive Hilmchl CD Dive (ee.I Monthly Workstation Maintenance M3001XT M310 M386116 M386sx Product Penduct Product Product Code Price Code Price Code Price Code Pica ( 8, 9) M386sx125 M486 Product Product Code Price Code Price RCM951 II $35 RCM9562 $35 RCM9564 $35 RCM9565 t30 RCM9509 $30 RCM9510 RCMgSOI NA NA RCM9573 $8 RCM9573 ~8 RCM9573 $8 RCM9573 $8 RCM9573 RCM9551 $18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA ~ RCM9571 $11 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA RCM9572 t 11 RCM9572 $11 RCM9572 t 11 RCM9572 $ ! 1 RCM9572 NA NA NA NA RCM9578 $15 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA RCM9508 t 11 RCM9508 911 RCM9508 NA NA NA NA RCMg577 920 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA RCMg552 920 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA RCM9512 96 RCM9512 96 RCM9512 96 RCM9512 96 RCM9512 NA NA RCMg563 95 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA RCM8315 919 RCM6315 $19 RCM6315 $19 RCM6315 919 RCM6315 M486sx125 M486DXI Product Product Other Monthly Maintenance Product Code Code PHee Code Pfic. e Dial Access Modern Depot Maintenance RCM7752 RCM9547 $37 RCM9513 $47 M220 Terminal RCM9575 RCM9550 9 ! 2 RCM9550 912 RCM6315 919 RCM6315 919 Annual Workstation Maintenance (9, 10, 11 ) 3-Year Extended Maintenance M486sx125 M486DXI Product Product Item code Price Code Price 3-Yf EMO Initld SlOnuplyr RCM9546 1310 RCM9514 9384 3-Yf EMO Subsequent SlOnuplW RCM9545 $353 RCM9515 $444 Price $9 $12 Miscellaneous Services (12) NRC9652 Base Visit Charge ~ 100/visit Item Re-install, Move Re-install, Move Convert Access, Convert Access, Readdress Readdress Installation Same Bldg Different Bldg Removal 113l Product Product Product Product Code Price Code Price Code Price Code Price Workstation NRC9661 $100 NRC9701 $100 NRC9771 $150 NRC7255 $100 OCLC Com Controller 1141 NC NC NRC9701 $100 NRC9771 $150 NRC7255 6100 Upgredes Hard Drives, Diskette Drives, 4MB Memory Board, Extended distance cables, SVGA Adapter, Serial/ Parallel Adapter, and Monitors, SIMM Memory Tape Drive, CD Drives NRC6339 ~42 NA NA NA NA NA NA Other Service Dial Access Modem Installation with new workstation only Product Code Price NRC6132 $40 Page 5 OCLC Pacific Certification. Re-certification Product Code Price NRC7191 $50 NA NA NA NA R CODE OTHE~ NRC 7256 NRC 6122 NRC NRC 6124 NRC 6120 NRC 9~31 NRC 981 ! PRODUCT TerminAl and Workstation Producu and Se-vieu Workstation Product.dMaintenance Part !, Section F, Page 6 APPENDIX I OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC Online Cu. aloginI - Taploading - Partial User Effective July I. ONL[NE CAT AND TAPELOADERS PARTIAL USER Models: M220. M3C~. M3OOXT. M310. M386/16. M386sx. M386sx/25 M486. M486sx/25. M486DXI. Communications Controllet Removal of Data SedDSU (15&16) Data wdDSU move in same building (16) Data sedDSU move to a different building (16) ot a new installation Modem/DSU move oniy (17&18) Fe~ for expediting a data sot.rDSU (lg&tg) move or installatio~ BiLlable service call (.20) (maintained equipment) per hour. plus patta Per-incident Repair Service (.2 i) (nortmaintained equipment) pet hour. plus patu Excludes any necessary. modern-related instaZlation charges. Early payment does not affect amount of payments. FreigJtt included. ~~gJ not be sold with'out installation service. Not necessary for M310s sold ks packagea. $375.00 $315.00 $ t .055 .CO $t~.00 $175.00 $1~0.00 Minimum charge S2~0.00 Minimum charge (1) ('2) (3) (4) (5) (6) Freight included. L, utallation not included when ordered sepuate!y from a new workstation. C7) Will not be sold without installation service unless ordered with a new workstation. (8) ALl monthly maintenance services billed one month in edvmtce of service month. (9) Sen separate mainrenege= agreement for provisions. (I0) All annual maintertartcc services billed one y~ar in advance of service year. (I I ) Price is per annual payment. Payments billed I st.. 13th.. and 2~th. month after maintenanca purchase. (12) A~I migeLlaneous services axcept 6132 incur Bas~ Visit Charge pins charge for each s~rvice performed. (13) All t~rminal/workstation removals performed in conjunction with a new workstation installation will incur this charge. (14) Coaununication Controllar charges apply for moves only. (15) Charge incurred when data s~Y]DSU is removed. Charge not l~vied in conjunction with moving a data set/DSU. (16) Data sex refers to the line end modem/DSU conneeted to the OCLC n~twork. (17) Charge incurred for moving modem/DlU after institution staff has moved a line within a building. (18) Lead time for a data seffDSU move within ~e same building or data set/DSU only move is 24 business days. Leed time for new installation or move to a different building is 38 business days. (19) Fee incurred for requests to expedite data sedDSU moves and installs. (20) Plus additional time and materials. Freight to be added for n~mry parts. (.21) Plus additional time end materials. Freight to be added for necemry pans. April 2/. 19q4 102 BPR 3390 BPR 3411 BPR 3389 TAPECON BPR 3402 BPR 3411 CODE PRODUCT MICROCON ' Single-matched Record MICROCON Holdings Deletion Service MICROCON S~lec~ Rctroslx~jve Conversion Products Put l, __~__ion G, Page I APPENDIX 1 OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC Oalinc Cata/oging - Tapeloading - Putial User Effective i'uiy I, 1994 UNIT PP,/CE (2) (2) Single-matched Record TAPECON Holdings Deletion Service FULLMARC CTR 3376 Single Set Hold ot Orilina/ CTR 3377 FUL;.~t-~RC Original Input Credit (l) [z%cludes optaorta1 equipment loan msd tape output. (2) Non-OCLC Members price<l the same as Members. S0.205 per record No Charge S0.23~ per record S0.205 p~r record No Charge I0.205 per record added ($O.2O5) 103 lnuc~ April 2'7. 1~).4 APPENDIX 1 OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC international Access Part I, Section H, Page OCLC OCLC - PACIFIC PACIFIC PARTIAL PARTIAL PRODUCT PRICE PRICE USER USER CODE DESCRIPTION MINUTE HOUR MINUTE HOUR CON6232 INTERNATIONAL DA PRE-PAID CON6233 INTEKNATIONAL DA-RATE A CON6234 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE B CON6235 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE C CON6236 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE D CON6237 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE E CON6238 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE F $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.190 $11.40 $0.215 $12.90 $0.292 $17.52 $0.318 $19.08 $0.442 $26.52 $0.468 $28.08 $0.559 $33,54 $0.585 $35.10 $0.725 $43.50 $0.751 $45.06 50.892 $53.52 $0.918 555.08 DescriPtion International Dial Access Pre-Paid World-wide access to Compuserve originating from International Record Carriers TRT, MCII, and AT&T. Access is pre-paid by the user to the carrier. International Dial Access Rate A Access to Compuserve originating from Compuserve, Da=apac, Sprintnet, or Tymnet locations in Canada 'n=ernational Dial Access Rate B :cess to Compuserve originating from Belgium (Compuserve), France (Compuserve), France ,TRANSPAC), Germany (Compuserve), Germany (Da=ex-P), Mexico (Infonet), The Netherlands (Compuserve), Switzerland (Compuserve), Switzerland (Telepac), Unlted Kingdom (Compuserve), United Kingdom (Mercury 5000), United Kingdom (GNS Dialplus), and Europe (Infonet) locations. International Dial Access Rate C Access to Compuserve originating from Australia and New Zealand (FALNET), Guam (PACNET}, Guam (Sprintnet), Guam (Tymnet), Mong Kong (Compuserve), and Japan (FENICS II), Pusrio Rico (Sprintnet), Puer=o Rico (TymneU), Israel (Israkov), and South Korea (POSNET) locations. International Dial Access Rate D Access to Compuserve originating from Taiwan (TTN-NET) and world-wide access to INFONET locations. International Dial Access Rate E Access to Compuserve originating from Japan (JENS) locations. International Dial Access Rate F Access to Compuserve originating world-wide from Sprintnet and T~annet locations not otherwise listed separately. Issued April 27, 1994 104 CODE DISCLIT CDD SCD CDD SCD APPENDIX ! Rcl*erence Service~ - Compact Discs Effective July 1. 1994 Prices ILkted in U.S. DoGus PRODUCT 6375 -DiscLit Americam Audmrs 637'7 Additional Copbu 63'78 DiscLie B~ Aut~ra 6379 Add~ Coppice 6317 R~placement of lost dL~ Rcfe. ren~ Servi~es - ComlM~t Di.r,s Part H, Section A, Page I PR/CE S995.00 e,a~h $597.00 each $995.00 aria ~rY.O0 each $10.00 eada Issued April 27, 1994 105 APPENDIX 1 Reference S~rviees - EPIC Deaba.su Effective luly 1. 1994 ABI/INFOR~t Danabut 30 Updated Weekly' CODE PRODUCT CON 1667 Connect Time CON 1668 Practice Database (930) EPC 1819 SDI Fee Record CbarBu EPC 1795 Format I Oaline EPC 1796 Format I Offtine EPC 1799 Format 20rdine* EPC 18430 Format 20f~ine* EPC 1799 Format 30nline EPC 18(30 Format 30ffiin¢ EPC 1803 Fortnat 50aline EPC 1804 Format 50ffiine EPC 1807 Format 70niino EPC 1808 Format 7 Offline EPC 1807 Format 90nline* EPC 1808 Format 90f~i,lle* EPC 1813 MYFORMAT Online EPC 18 14 MYFOILMAT Offline EPC 18 I7 User Selected Formats Oa~ine EPC 18 18 User Selected Forus Offline Display List is available at no chuge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rcrce~nr~ Serv~ - EPIC Databa.s~ Put H. Seaion A, Page 2 PRICE $80.00 per hour $tO.00 per hour ~.00 each ~.05 ~.05 eech ~0.40 each ~.40 each ~0.40 each ~.7S sh ~.75 uch ~.75 ~.75 ~.75 ~ch ~.7S ~.75 ~h ~.7S ~.75 uch ~.75 ~ im~d April 27, 1994, 106 APPENDD( I Rcl'cr~nge Services - EPIC Datab--~, Effo:tive July 1,199,1 AGRJCOLA Databag ~6 U~ted ~ton~fy CODF, PRODUCT CON 1201 Connect Time CON I202 Practice Databin (956) EPC I215 SD[ F~ Record C!uu'F~ EPC 1203 Format I Oa/ine EP~ 1204 Format I OfTLine EPC 1205 Format 20a/ine* EIaC 1206 Format 20tll. ine* F, PC 1205 Form~ 30nllae EPC 1206 Format 30ffl. ine EPC 1207 Format 50nline EPC 1208 Format 5 EPC 1209 Fotma~ 70n/ine EPC I210 Format 70t'~.ine EPC 1207 Format 90il"dj. lle· EPC 1208 Format 90t'fiiae EPC 1211 MYFOKMAT Oa/ine EPC 1212 MYFOR~4AT Ot'fiine EPC 1213 User Selected Formats Online EPC 1214 User Selected Form Offline Display list is available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rct'crcnce Service. a - EPiC Daub&sea Part !1, Section A. Page 3 PRICE $20.00 per hour $10.00 per hour $3.00 each Issued April 27. 1994 107 APPENDIX 1 Reference Servic~z - EPIC Effective July 1. 199~ Applied Science & Technology Index Database 53 Upcis~ed Monthly CODE PRODUCT CON 1227 Cotmeet Time CON 1228 Practice Database (953) EPC 1229 SDI Fee Record Chargee EPC 1230 Format t Online EPC 1231 Format t Offline EPC 1232 Format 20nline* EPC I933 Format 20ffiine* EPC 1234 Format 30nline EPC 1935 Format 30ffii~, EPC 1236 Fornm S O~Zine EPC 1237 Format 5 C)ffiine EPC 1238 Format 90nl~e* EPC 1239 EPC 1240 EPC 12~I Format 9 Oftline* MYFOI~MAT/Usu Selected Formats Onlinc MYFO~MAT/User Selected Formats Offline Display List is available at no charJc. *Contains OCLC holdings Retcrencc Services - EPIC Data~ass Part II, S~-tion A. Page 4 PRJCE S.~3.00 inr hour $10.00 l~r hour $2.00 eech $0.05 ~ach ~.05 ~ch $0.40 uch $0.40 ~ach $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.75 uch ~.75 ~ch ~.75 ~.75 ~ch ~.75 ~.75 ~ch hsued April 27. 1994 108 Art Index Database 6 ! U!xtated MonthJy APPENDIX 1 Reference Services - EPIC Databases Effective July 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 1216 Connet Time CON 1217 Practice Database (961) EPC 1226 $DI Fen Record Charien EPC 1218 Format I OnZine EPC 1219 Format I Offiiae EPC 1220 Format 20uline* E?C 1221 Format 20t~ine* EPC 1220 Format 30rdine EPC 1221 Format 30ffiine EPC 1222 Format 50nltne EPC 1223 Format 50ffiine EPC 1222 Form 9 Otlline® EPC 1223 Format 90ffiine* EPC 1224 MYFOR~MAT~jset Suleted Formats Online EPC 1295 MYFORMAT/1Jser Sdected formats Offline Display List is available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Reference Serviea - EPIC Put fl, Sa:tion A. Page ~5 PRICE $30.00 per hour $10,00 per hour $1.00 each I0.05 each $0.05 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.40 each 30.40 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0,75 each $0.75 e~ch $0.75 each $0.75 uch Issued April 27. 1994 APPENDEX 1 Rdcreacc Servicu - EPIC Databeau Effective July I. 1994 Az'ticleFb's~ Database 25 Updated W~k/y, CODE PRODUCT CON 5(=08 Cormact Time CON 5609 Practice Database (925) EPC ~56t0 $DI Fee Record Chatgee ~:1~ 5~ Format ! Ordbse EPC 5612 Format I Offi~ne EPC 5615 Format 50aZme* EPC 5616 Format 50t'fiL, te* EPC 5619 MYFORMAT On/ine EPC 5620 MYFOP, MAT Offline EPC 5621 User Selected Formats Online EPC 5622 User Selected Formats Ot'tlLqe Display List is evagable at no charge. *ContaL~s OCLC hold~gs Rcfcrcace Services - EPIC Databsses Psrt rl, Section A, Page 6 PP,~CE $30.00 per hour $1Q.C0 per hour $1.00 each $0.05 each S0.05 each S0.75 esch $0.75 each S0.75 each S0.75 each S0.75 eech !uued April 27, 1994 110 APPENDDC 1 Rducncc Services - EPIC Databases Effective, July !. 1994 A.,'ts & Humrarities Search Database 62 Up<lated Wc~kJy CODE PRODUCT CON 1683 Coaaact Time, CON 1684 Practice, Database (962) EPC 1685 .qDl Fee Record CharZea EPC 1686 Format I Onliae EPC IM7 Format I OreLee EPC 1688 Format 20nliae* EPC 1689 Form~ 20t'ftiae* EPC 1688 Format 30nJiae EPC 1689 Format 30t'fiiae EPC 1690 Format :50nline EPC 1691 Format EPC 1690 Format EPC 1691 FormatgOt'fl. ia~,· EPC 1692 MYFORMAT OnZia~, EPC 1693 MYFORa%4AT OftIia~, EPC 1694 User Sc,lacted Formau Oniiac EPC 1695 User Sel~~cted Formats Ofiliae Display List is available .t no charge,. *Contains OCLC holdlaBs Rcf-rcacc Servicea - EPIC Databases Part II. Section A. Page 7 PRICE $80.00 per hour $tO.00 per hour $3.00 each $0.05 each $0.05 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.40 each S0.40 each $0.7:5 each $0.75 each $0.7j each $0.7:5 each $0.7:5 each $0.7:5 each $0.7:5 each $0.7:5 each '""' """ 2" ""' 111 Database 12 Ulxlated MontJ-,ly APPENDD( ! Rcrcrcnce Services - EPIC Databases EZTective July 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 5505 Connect Time CON 5506 Practice Database (912) EPC 5507 $D[ Fee Record Clstrges EPC 5508 Format I Oniine EPC 5509 Format I Offiine EPC 5510 Fortnat 20~ine* EPC 55% 1 Format 20ffiine® EPC 5510 Format 30nfizm EPC 55tl Format3Offiine EPC 55 t2 Format 50nline EPC 5513 Format 50ffiine EPC 5512 Format 90z~ine® EPC 5513 Format 90lline® EPC 5514 MYFOR~AT OnZine EPC 55t5 MYFOR~MAT Offiine EPC 5516 U~r Selected Formats Online EPC 5517 User Selected Formats Offiine Display List is availablc at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rel%rcnee Services - EPIC Databeau Part H, Section A, Page g PPJCE $30.00 per hour $10.00 per hour $1.130 each $0.05 ~ $0.05 each $0.40 ee~ $0.40 ear $0.40 e~h $0.40 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 sh ~.75 ~ch ~.75 g~h Issued April 27. 1994 112 APPENDIX 1 Rcrcrcncc Scrvicm - EPIC Dazabuu Effccr. ive July l, 1994 Biololicsi & ASricultursl Index Datab=s~ 54 Updated ~ontl~y CODE PRODUCT CON 1317 Connect Time CON 1318 Practice Database (954) EPC 1319 $DI Fee Record Charges EPC 1320 Format I On,line EPC 1321 Format I Offine EPC 1322 Format 20nline* EPC 1.~:7 Format 20ffine* EPC 13;- Format 30rdine EPC 13;j Format 30ffltne EPC 13;~ Format S Oniine EPC 1327 Format S Office EPC 1328 Format 90n]ine® E PC 1329 EPC 1330 EPC 1331 Format 9 Offlie* MYFORMATPU'set Selected Formats O~izte MYFOR,MATPUser SeZectad Formats Or~iac Display List is available at no charJe. *Contains OCLC holdings Rcfcrcnc~ Services - EPIC De. mbuu Part H. Section A. Page 9 PRICE $~Q.O0 per hour $10.00 lxr hour $'2.00 each S0.05 each S0.05 eech S0.40 etch SO.40 each S0.40 ~h ~.~ ~h ~.75 ~h ~.75 mob ~.75 ~h ~.75 ~.75 uch ~.75 uch 113 APPENDEX 1 Rcrcrcnc~ Scrvicu - EPIC Deubuu EITect~ve l~y I. Biology Da~ba~ 57 U~at~ 9 t~e~y~r CODE PRODU~ CON 1242 Co~t CON 1243 Practice DaMbin (9~ E~ 12U $DI Record CbazB=i EPC 1245 EPC 12d,6 EPC 1247 EPC 1248 EPC 1249 EPC 1230 EPC 1251 EPC 12~2 Format [ Ordine Format I Of'fiLet Format 30nfine Format 30t'~ine Format 50~iae Format 50t'fliae MYFOR~4ATajser $glccted Forruts Oniiae MYFO&%tATfijser Selected Forruts Ot'~bte Display List is available ~ no charge. Reference S4=rvic, u - EPIC Databuu Part II, Section A, PaSo l0 PZUCE S-t0.00 Per hour S10.00 per hour SI.0O each $0.05 =Ida $0.05 uda $0.40 each $0.,I0 each $O.75 each $0.75 uch $0.75 each luued April 27, 199~ BIO$1S Previews DafabaM ~0 Updated V~'~!d~ APPENDDC I Rc[ereuce Setvie. - EPIC Dsubts. Effective July 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 5380 Connect Time CON 5381 Practice Database (950) EPC 5382 SDI Fee Record Chargee ELK:: 5383 Format I On/iae EPC 5384 Format I Of~ine EPC 5385 Format 30aline EPC 5386 Format 30lrfline EPC 5387 Format 50nline EPC 5388 Format 50ffiino EPC 5389 Format 70nl~e EPC 5390 Format 7 Offline EPC 5393 MYFOR~%4AT Onliae EPC 5394 MYFOR,MAT Ot'~ine EPC 5391 User Selected For~*r, Onfine EPC 5392 User Selected Formats O~ine Reference Services - EPIC Deubesu Part I/, Section A. Page I I PRICE $70.00 per hour Si0.00 per hour Sl.50 eech ~.40 each I0.40 uch I0.40 eech $0.40 I0.75 eac~ S0.75 eech I0.75 each $0.75 ee~h S0.75 50.75 each S0.7~ each $0.75 each ,..., 2,. 115 Database 22 Updated Monthly APPENDD( 1 Reference Services - EPIC Dazabucs Effective Ju/y I, 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 1665 Connect Time CON 1666 Practice Database (922) Record Charges EPC I760 Format I Online EPC 1761 Forst I Offline EPC 1764 Format 30nline EPC 1765 Format 3 Offline EPC 1770 Format S Online EPC 1771 Format 5 Offline EPC 1774 Format 70nliae EPC I775 Format 7 Offline EPC 1772 Format 80n~ine EPC 1773 Format 8 Offline EPC 1782 MYFORMAT Online EPC I783 MYFORMAT Offline EPC 1790 User Selected Formats On/ine EPC 1791 User Selected Formats Of't~ine List available at no charge. Rcfercnc~ Services - EPIC Databases Part II, Section A. Pagc 12 PRICE S40.00 per hour $t0.00 per hour SO.05 each .I0.05 each ~:).40 each K3.40 each $0.75 each S0.75 each ~.75 u~ ~.75 ~h ~.75 ~h ~.75 ~.75 ,-ued 27. 116 APPENDIX 1 Reference S,:rvices - EPIC Effective July I, 1994 Book Review Digest DaMbag 21 Updated Mont~Z CODE PRODUCT CON 5667 Connect Time CON 5668 Pta~iee Databin (921) EPC 5681 SDIFee Record Charge, EPC 5669 Format I Online EPC 5670 Format I Offine EPC 5682 Format 20niine* EPC 5683 Format 2 Offline* EPC 5671 Format 30niine EPC 5672 Format 30fHine EPC 5673 Format 5 C~line EPC 5674 Format 5 Offine EPC 5684 Format 90niine* EPC 5685 Format 9 Offline* EPC 5677 MYFORMAT Ordine EPC 5679 User Selected Formats Online EPC 5680 Lrser Selected Formats Offline Display List available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rcfcrenc~ Servicae - EPIC Deza~es~ Part If, Section A, Page 13 PR/CE $20.00 per hour $10.C0 per hour S2.00 each $0.05 eae. h $0.05 each $0.40 each $0.~0 each $0.40 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each 117 APPENDIX 1 Reference $ervicu - EPIC Dsubuu Effective July 1. 1994 BusinessNews Daisbase 35 Updated Daily CODE PRODUCT CON l.~-t6 Cotmeet Time CON 1447 Practice Database EPC 1-t-~8 SD[ Fee Record Charges EPC EPC EPC EPC EPC EPC 1449 Format I Online 1450 Format I O[tlino ld,51 Format 50nline Id,52 Format 5 Oft'line [453 MYFOI~MAT Online 1454 MYFOILMAT Offiine Rct'crencc Services - EPIC Databases Part 11. Section A, Page 14 PIUCE $70.00 per hour S10.00 per hour S[.00 each S0. I0 each SO. lO each S0.40 each SO.dO each 10.4~ each SO.dO each luuod April 27. 1994 118 BusL, tcss Darcliac D,;tabase 31 IJpda~d 9,'e4~dy APPENDIX 1 Reference Servicce - F,PIC Detabe.~J Effective ;u!y 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 1673 Conaect Tb~e CON 1674 Practice Database (931) EPC 1905 $DI Fee Record Chargee I:pC 1881 Forrot I Oafiae F-PC 1882 Format I Offline EPC 1885 Format 30tdine EPC 188~ Format 3 Oftline EPC 1889 Format 50nfiae EPC 1890 Format 50ffiinc EPC I893 Fortnat 70n/tae EPC 1894 Format 7 Offline EPC 1899 MYFOILMAT Online EPC 1900 MYFORMAT Offline EPC 1903 User Selected Formats Oniine EPC 19~ User Selected Formats Offline Display List available at no charge. Refer=nee Services - F,PIC Part II, &=ction A. Page PPJCE $80.00 per hour $10.0(3 per hour $3.00 each $0.05 each $0.05 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $3.(30 each $3.00 each S3.00 each $3.00 each $3.130 eech $3.00 each $3.Q0 each $3.00 each Issued Apri/27. 1994 119 APPENDIX 1 Reference Scrvice~ - EPIC Databuea Effective July I. 1994 Busi~eu Orgaaizations Databas~ 34 Updated AJmu&Lly CODE PRODUCT CON 562~ Cotm~t TLme Fec CON 5626 Practice Databa~ (934) EPC 5635 SDi Fee R~o~d ChatSea EPC 562? Format I Oniine EPC 5628 Format 1 56~ Fot~ 30~e 5629 For~t 30~e 5631 For~ 50~ 5632 For~ 5 5633 MYFO~MAT O~ 56~ MYFO~AT 5636 U~r Se!~ For~u 5637 U~r ~l~t~ Formrs OffiCe Display Lis~ evaihble at no charge. Rcfcrcncc Scrvicea - EPIC Databa.vJ Pan U. Section A. Page 16 PRICE $-,0.00 Per hour $10.0(3 per hour $1.00 each $0.05 each $0.05 ecch $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each !..ed27. !-, 320 Bus~ss Per~odic.~s Index Da~absse 33 Up<iatgd Monthly CODE PRODUCT CON 5436 Cormget TLme CON 5437 Practice Database (933) EPC 5438 SDI Fec APPENDD( 1 Rcferencg Servicu - EPIC Databuts Effective July I, 1994 Record Charges EPC 5439 Format IOdinc EPC 5440 Format I Of~ine EPC 5441 Format 20nline* EPC 5442 Format 2 Offline* EPC 5441 Format 30nline EPC .~4.42 Format 3 Offline EPC 5443 Format 50nline EPC E:~-~. Format 5 Offline EPC 5445 Forme~ 70nfizm EPC 5446 Format 7 Off'line EPC 5443 Format 90n/ine* EPC .t~. ,.~Format 9 Offline* EPC 5447 MYFOR,MAT Online E!~ ~ MYFOR.MAT Offline EPC Sd49 UMr Selecmd For,-*- Otdine EPC 5450 l,rMr Selected Formats Offline Display Lin~ ava~lableatnocharSe. *Contains OCLC holdings Rdcrcncc Services - EPIC Databuts Part H, Section A, Page 17 PPJCE S40.00 per hour S10.00 per hour $1.50 each $0.05 each $0.05 each $0.40 uch $0.40 each $0.40 each S0.40 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 gac~ $0.75 each $0.7~ each $0.75 each $0.75 e4ch issued April 27, 1994 121 Comp~nd~x*Plus Dafabas~ 52 Updated Monthly CODE PRODUCT CON 5552 Cotmeet T~-,e CON 5553 Practice Databa~ (952) EPC 555-~ SD[ Fee APPENDIX 1 Refcrcnce Services - EPIC Effective July I. 1994 Reeord Cha~ges EPC 5555 Format I Onliae EPC 5556 Format I Otline EPC 5557 Format 20niine· EPC 5558 Formac 20ffXine* EPC 5557 Format 30nljne EPC 5558 Format 30mine EPC 5559 Format 50nllne EPC 5560 Format 5 Offline EPC 5561 Formaz 70t%lb%e EPC 5562 Formae 70f~ine EPC 5559 Format 90n/inc* EPC 55(a0 Former 90ffiine* EPC 5563 MYFORJ~AT Oni~ne EPC 55<~, MYFOR,MAT O~i~e EPC 5565 User Sulccted Formats Online EPC 5566 User Selected Formats Offline Display Li.~ is aveGable at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rcfcrcncc Services - EPIC Databuu Put H. Section A. Page i 8 PRJCE $90.00 per hour $10.0(3 per hour $3.00 each /0.15 each S0.15 each SO.dO each SO.dO each S0.40 each S0.40 each $0.75 each $0.75 eech $0.75 each S0.75 each $0.75 each S0.75 each S0.75 each ~.75 eech S0,T5 each 10.75 each Issued Aprn 27. 1994 Colt.surners [Aclex. Database l I Updated Quarterly APPENDIN: 1 Reference Services - EPIC Dazehues Effective ~u~y l, 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 5348 Connect Time CON 5349 Practice Datsbsse (91 I) EPC 5360 $DI Fee Rr, ord Cbup EPC 5350 Format I Online EPC 535! Format I Offl~.c EPC 5352 Forst 20~line* EPC 5353 Former 30fll. ine* EPC 5352 Format 30n/inc EPC 5353 Forst 3 ElK: 5354 Format 50nliae EPC 5355 Forum S Offline EPC 5354 Format 90aline* EPC 5355 Format 9 EPC 5356 MYFORMAT Online EPC 5357 MYFORMAT Offling EPC 5358 User Selected Form Onlin¢ EPC 5359 User Selected Formats Display List is available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Referere S~rvic~ - EPIC Put !1, ~_~'~L"~jOn A. Page 19 PPJCE S40.00 pet hour $10,00 per hour $0.50 each S0.05 each S0.05 uch S0.40 each S0.40 each $0.40 each $0.40 eec~ $0.75 each S0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each g.TS each $0.75 each S0.75 each $0.75 each Issued AptB 27, 1994. Con_tentsFitst Database 24 Updated W'eeidy CODE PRODUCT CON 5586 Comte~t Time CON 5587 Practice Database (924) EPC 5585 SDI Fee APPENDDC ! Reference Services - EPIC Databases Effective July 1. 1994 Record CbarSes EPC 5589 Format I Oaline EPC 5590 Format ! Offline EPC 5593 Format 30nline EPC 5594 Format 3 Oftline EPC 5597 Format 50nliac* EPC 5598 Format 5 Oftline* EPC 5602 MYFORMAT O~liae EPC 5603 MYFOR.MAT Offiine EPC 5604 User Selected Formats On/ine EPC 5605 User Selected Formats Of'fline Display List is evaGable st no charlc. *ContaLqs OCLC holdi~p Rcrcrcac4 Services - EPIC Part II, Section A. Page 20 PRZCE $30.00 per hour $I0.00 per hour S1.00 each S0.05 each S0.05 each ~K).40 each ~0.75 each $0.75 eech S0.75 uch $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each Issued April 27. 1994 Dissertation AbsctacU Database 20 USxhted Mont~dy APPEND[X I Rc/'crcnc~ Scx~icu - EPIC Databeau Effective luly 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 1669 Connect Tbac CON 1670 Practice Database (920) E]a~C 1845 SDlFec Record EFC 1821 Format I Onlinc EPC 1822 For~t E~ 18~ Foist 30~ E~ t826 For~ 30~ E~ t 829 For~ ~Ob E~ 18~ For~ 50~e E~ 1839 M~O~AT E~ ;~ MYFO~AT EPC 1 M3 U~t ~1~ Fot~ Od~ Display Hat is available at no charge. Reference Services - EPIC Databases Pert II. ~tion A, Page 21 PRICE S50.00 per hour S10.00 per hour $6.00 each SO.OS each S0.05 uch S0.40 each S0.40 each S0.75 each S0.7S each S0.75 each S0.75 cech S0.75 each $0.75 eada lu~ecl .~orll 27. 199~, APPENDIX I Rctcrcncc Services - EPIC Databtse. s Effective JuJy I, 1994, Education L'tdex Database 6 Upciated Mondlly CODE PRODUCT CON 1302 Connect Time CON 1303 Practice DE, base C906) EPC 130~ SDI Fea Record Charges El:q:: 1305 Forst I Ordine EPC 1306 Former I Offiine EPC 1307 Format 20gdine· ElK: 1308 Forrot 2 Offline· EPC 1309 Forst 30n/ine EPC 1310 Format 3 Offline EPC 1311 Format 50~ine EPC 1312 Format 5 Offline EPC 1313 Format 90~line* EPC 1314 Format 9 Offline* EPC 1315 MYFORMAT Oalina EPC 1316 MYFORMAT Offline Display List is available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rcrcrcncc S<=rvicu - EPIC D~abues Part H. Section A, PaBc 22 PR/CE S40.00 per hour S10,00 per hour S2.CX) each $0.05 each $0.05 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each Issued April 27. 1994 APPENDIX 1 Refct~nc~ S~rvice. s - EPIC Databuu Eff~jvc luly i, 1994 ERIC Database 1 Ul~tar~:l Monttdy COD~: PRODUCT CON 1663 Cotmgt Tim~ CON !~ Pt~ti~ Da~a~ (~l) E~ 1719 SDI F~ Record C!mrSm EPC 1720 Format I Online EPC 1721 Format I Offline ElK: 1724 Format 30nlino EPC 172~ Form~ 3 Offline EPC 1730 Format 50nlt~ EPC 1731 Format 50t'fl~ EPC 1734 Forst 70n/ine EPC 1735 Foru 70flLqiae EPC 1740 Formst 90nline EPC 1741 Format 9 Offline EPC I742 MYFOR~AT Online EPC 1743 MYFOR~AT Offline EPC 1750 User Seleaecl Form On/ine EPC 175I User Selecrat Formers Offline Display List is available at no charSe. Rducnc~ Services - EPIC Dinhoses Put ll. Section A. Page 23 PRICE $20.00 per hour $10.00 per bout S0.?.5 uch Evcn:LL, te Database 15 Updated Monday APPENDIX I Refuenc~ Servicea - EPIC Da~ba.~s Effective July I. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 16~ Comtect Tizae CON 1645 Practice Database (915) EPC 1646 SDI Fee Record Cba~gee EPC 1647 Format I EPC 16~,8 Format I Oflliae EPC 1~9 Forst 3 1650 For~t 30~e 1651 For~50~e EPC 1652 Foist 50ffi~ 1653 MYFO~AT ~e EPC ~6~ MYFO~AT EPC 1655 U~r ~I~ For~u O~e EPC 1656 U~r Sel~ For~ O~ Display Lis~ is avaiJable at ao charge. Rdctcnc~ Service, - EPIC Databuca Pert it, ~_~x'~_jon A, Page 24 PRICE :$60.00 per hour $10 .Q0 per hour $3.50 eech $0.05 each $0.05 each ,$O.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each I0.75 each luuext Apri~ 27. 1994 APPENDIX I Rcl'crence Servlccs - EPIC Dazebeaee Effective 3uly 1. 1994 General S4:iencc Indcx' Database SS Updated Montldy CODE PRODUCT CON 1657 Connect Time CON 16S8 Prscticg Dembue (9S5) EPC 1659 $DI Fee Record CbsrF= EPC 1708 Form~ ! Online EPC 1709 Foru I Offiine EPC 1710 Forrose 20nline' EPC I711 Forms~ 20tllirm* EPC 1710 Format 30nlirs EFC 1711 Form~3Offiine EPC 1712 Format 50udrse EPC 1713 Fora~ 5 Offline EPC 1712 Format 90uline* EPC 1713 Form~ 90ffibte· EPC 1714 ~YFOR,~AT Online EPC 1715 MYFOR~AT Offline EPC 17~6 User SHeered Formats O,,~ine EPC 1717 User Selected Formats Ot'~Lqe Display List is available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rcfcrcncg Services - EPIC Detab--,-- Pert H. Secdon A. Pagc 25 PRICE $30.00 per hour S 10.00 per hour $1.00 ecch $0.05 each $0.05 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each Issued April 27. 1994. GeoRef Database :J i Ul>clatecl Monthly APPENDD( 1 Rcfcrcnce Service~ - EPiC Databa.se~ Effective July 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 5362 Connect Time CON 5363 Practice Database (951) EPC 5364 5D[ Fee Record Chatgee EPC 5365 Format I Oniine EPC 5366 Format I Offline EPC 5367 Format 30nline I:pC 5368 Format 3 Offline EPC 5369 Format 5 On.line EPC 5370 Format 50ffEme I~PC: 537t Format 70nline EPC 5372 Format 70f~ine EPC 5373 MYFOR~AT Oniine EPC 537~ MYFOIL~AT Offline EPC 5375 User Selected Formats O~i~ EPC 5376 User Seteeted Formats O[flme Display List is available at no charge. Reference Services - EPIC Detebazez Part II, Section A, Page 26 PRICE $70.00 per hour $ZO.O0 per hour $2.00 each $0.05 each S0.05 each SO.40 each ~.75 ~.75 ~.75 ach ~.75 Mch ~.75 ~h ~.75 uch ~.75 lssu~l April 27. 1994 130 GPO Monthly Catalog Databag 10 Updated Monthly CODE PRODUCT CON 5322 Connect Time CON 5323 Practice Dcabm (910) EPC 5320 $DI Fee APPENDIX 1 Rcfcrcnc~ Servicu - EPIC De/~buu E~ccrjve July 1, 1994 Record Charles EPC 5324 Foru I Onliae EFC 5325 Format I Oftlie EPC 5326 Format 30aliaa EPC 5327 Format 30f~ine EPC 5328 Format 5 Onii~e EPC 5329 Forzzm 5 Offline EPC 5330 Format 70allae EPC 5331 Foru 7 Offlie EPC 533J, MYFOR~MAT Online I~PC 5335 MYFOILMAT Offline EPC 5332 User Seleaed Format~ Online EPC 5333 User Selected Formats Offlie Display LL~ is available at no charge. Rel'creaee Servieu - EPIC Databin Paz~ I1, $ectioa A, Page 27 PR.[CE $20.00 per hour $10.00 per hour $0.75 each $0.05 each $0.05 each $0.05 each $0.05 each luued April 27. 1994 131 APPENDIX 1 Reference Scrvicu - EPIC Datahues Effective July I. 1994 Huma.,titics Index Database 60 Ulxiatcd Monthly CODE PRODU~r CON 5487 Connect TLme CON 5488 Practice Databu~ (960) EPC 5489 SD! Fee Record Chatgu EI~ 5490 Foram I OrJine EI:~C 549l Format I Offline EPC 5492 Format 2 OILne· EPC 5493 Format 20t'~jlle· EPC 5492 Format 30n/Lnc EPC 5493 Format 30ffiLnc EPC 5494 Foram S On!Lne EPC 549~ Format 5 Offline EPC 5494 Format 9 On/~ee EPC 5495 Format 90r~Lne, EPC 5498 MYFOP~MAT Online EPC 5499 MYFORMAT Offiine EPC 5.,~30 User Selected Formau OnlLne EPC 5502 User Selected Formats Ot'fline Display List is available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Reference S~rvicu - EPIC Databags Part H. Section A. Page 28 PR/CE $30.00 per hour S10.(X3 per hour $1.00 each $0.05 uch $0.05 each $0.40 each $0.40 ~ach $0.40 each ~.~ uch ~.75 uch ~.75 ~ch ~.75 ~ch ~.75 $0.75 ~ch ~.T5 uch ~.75 luued Apri~ 27. 1994 132 APPENDIX I S~rvica - EPIC DntAbue~ EiTa~.ivo July I, 1994 INSPEC UpPed WMldy CODE PRODUCT CON 1459 Co~t CON 14~ Pra~i~e Databin ~$8) EPC i~1 SDI FM Rmord Chariea EPC 1462 Forma~ I Onliz~ EPC 1463 Forma~ I Ofi'l~e EPC 146~ Forma~ 20afine* EPC 1465 Format 20flline* EPC 1466 Format 30aZine 1467 Format 30fEin~ EPC 1468 Forram 50nliz~ EPC 1469 Foram 50tllizm EPC 1470 Forma~ 90nZhte* EPC 1471 Format 90t'tlie* EPC 1472 MYFORMAT/U~er $eleaed Formau ChtZine EPC 1473 MYFOR~AT/UMr .~J,~r~l Formats Offi~ne Display Li.~ iz available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rcircratc~ Servica - EPIC D~tabun Part I1, S~:fion A, Pagc 29 PPJCE $120.00 per hour $10.00 p~r hour $3.00 I~r hour SO.O~ each S0.40 uch S0.40 uch SO.40 each S0.40 each $0.75 each S0.75 each $0.75 uch ~.75 each S0.75 each S0.75 each luuod April 27. 1994 133 Libra_r/Literature Database 5 Lrpdsfccl Monthly APPENDIX I Reference S~=rvic~s - EPIC D-,-ka~-_ EIT{.~ivc July I. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 1257 Conacct Time CON 12~8 Practice Database (905) EPC 1259 $DI Fee Record Chrlea EPC 1260 Format I Online EPC 1261 Forumat I Offline EPC 1262 Fortrot 20uline® Elm(: 1263 Format 2 OfTline® EPC 12~ Format 30nliue EPC 1265 Format 30~ine EPC 1266 Format S Ouline EPC 1267 Format 50ffliae EPC 12~8 Format 9 C)idin{~· EPC 1269 Format 90tline* EPC 1270 MYFOR~%4AT OnZlne EPC 1271 MYFORMAT OfTline Display List is available at no chaqe. *Contabu OCLC holdings Reference Servicu - EPIC Part fl, Section A, Page 30 PRICE $20.00 per hour S10.00 per hour $1.00 each S0.05 each SO.05 each $0.~0 each S0.~0 each ~.~ ~h ~.~ ~h ~.75 ~ch ~.75 ~ch ~.75 ~.75 ~.75 ~c~ ~.75 ~h Issued Aprg 27, 1994 A Matter of Pact Database 14 Updated Quarterly APPENDIX 1 Reference Servicu - EPIC Databasea Effective July I. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 565 [ Connect Time CON EPC 5663 SD[ Fee Record ChatIra EPC 5653 Format I Chdine EPC 565,t Format I O~iae EPC 5655 Former 20~line* EPC 5656 Forrace 20~ine* EPC 5655 Forrot 30tdine EPC 5656 Forst 30fl~jAe EPC ~6~7 Format S Online EPC ~658 Form~ ~ Orfiine EPC 56~7 Format 90n/ine* EPC 56S8 Format 9 Omine, EPC 5661 MYFORMATOnline EPC 5662 MYFORMAT Offfine EPC 5659 User SeZected Formats On/ine EPC 5660 User Selected Form Ot'fline Display List is available at no charge. *Contain OCLC holdings Reference Services - EPIC Databuee Part H, Section A, Page 31 PR/CE S30.Q0 per hour $lO.OO per hour $0.50 each $0.05 each $0.05 each $0.4O each $0.40 each $0.4O each $0.40 ee~x $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each luucd Aprn 27, 1994 MEDLINE Database 48 Updated Monthly APPENDEX I Rcfcrcnc~ Services - EPIC Databases Effc~tlvc July I. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 1272 Corm~ct Time CON 1273 Practice Database (948) EPC 1274 SD! Fee Record Charles EPC 1275 Format i OnlLne EPC 1276 Format I Offiina EPC 1277 Format 20nl~e· EPC 1278 Format 20ffline* EPC 1279 Format 30nlino EPC 1280 Format 3 Oftline EPC ! 281 Format 50nJlnc EPC 1282 Format 5 Offline EPC 1283 Format 9 OttZine· EPC 1284 Format 90f['Zine=· EPC 1285 MYFO!~MAT Oniine EPC 1286 MYFORMAT Ofl]ine EPC 1285 User Selectcol Formats EPC 1286 User Selected Formats Display List is available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdinp Reference Services - EPIC Databases Part II. Section A. Page 32 PRICE $20.00 per hour $10.00 per hour $2.00 each $0.05 each $0.05 each $0. I0 each S0. I0 each $0.10 each S0.10 each S0.10 each $0.10 each S0. I0 each S0. t0 each $0. I0 each S0.10 each SO. 10 each $0.10 each luued April 27. 1994 136 APPENDD( 1 Rcruenc~ Services - EPIC Databases Effectira July 1. 1994 Microcomputer Abszracts Databas~ &4 Updated Mont~y CODE PRODUCT CON 1287 Connect Time CON 1288 Practice Database (944) EPC 1289 $DI Fee Record Chargee EPC 1290 Format I OnZine EPC 1291 Format I Offliae EPC 1292 Format 20nline* EPC ~293 Format 20ff~n¢® EPC 1294 Format 30nline EPC 1295 Format 3 Offline EPC 1296 Format 50nline EPC 1297 Format 5 Offline EPC 1298 Format 9 Offline* EPC 1299 Format 9 Offline* EPC 13430 MYFOILMAT/Uset Selected Formats On~ina EPC 130l MYFORMAT/1.;set Selected Formats Offline Display List is available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rcl'eretw. s Serve?__--_ - EPIC Databases Pan If. Seaion A. Page 33 PR/CE $50.00 per hour $10.00 per hour S3.00 eel S0.75 each $O.75 each S0.75 each S0.75 each Issued April 27. 1994 137 MLA Bibliography Database 7 t Updated 10 time~yaar APPENDIX 1 Rgl'arcn¢8 S~rvir4s - EPIC Dazaba.~s Effeaivc July 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 5639 Connect Time CON 5640 Practice Databe.~ (97t) R~cord Clmrgu EP~ 5~I Format EP~ 5~42 Forrot EPC 5~3 Forrot E~ 5~ Forrot EPC 5~3 For~ EPC S~ Format EPC ~5 For~ EPC 5~6 Format EPC 5~5 Forrot EPC EPC EPC EPC 56~ EPC 5~7 I Ozdine I Ot'~ine 20nJine* 20ffiLne* 30~ine 30ffiine 90nZine* Format 9 OraL, re* MYFORMAT Onliz,.e MYFOR~MAT Offl. ine User Selected Formats OniL-te User Sel~.-ted Formats Of~i~c Display List is available at no charge. ,Contains OCLC holdings Reference S~rvic~s - EPIC Daza~a,~s Part H. S~ction A, Page 34 PRjCE S60.00 per hour $10.00 per hour Issued April 27. 1994 N~wspal~r Dat~ba~ 28 U~!a~ed CODE PRODU~ CON 16~ Co~ E~ 1678 Pra~icc D~abm (928) EPC 1679 SDi FEE APPENDIX 1 Reference Services - EPIC Database= Effective July i, 1994 Record Chargu EPC 1926 ForEtat ] O-liae ELK:: 1927 Format I Ot'fline EPC 1925 Format 30nfiae EI>C 1929 Format 3 Offfine EPC 1930 Format 50n~ine EPC 1931 Format 5 Oftline EPC 1932 Format 70nline EPC: 1933 Format 70tlline EPC 1934 MYFORMAT Online EPC 1935 MYFORMAT Of Hine EPC 1936 User Selected Formats On/iae EPC 1937 User Selected Formats Of.q~ne Display List is available at no charge. Referenc~ Setvim - EPIC D&tebuee Part II, Section A, Page 35 PR/CE $60.00 per hour St0,00 per hour S3.00 each $0.05 each $0.05 each SO.dO each SO.dO each $0.75 each S0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each Issued April 27, 1994 139 APPENDC( 1 Rcrcrcac~ Scrvicgs - EPIC Dazabe. se.s Effective 3dy I. 1994 OCLC Ordmc Union Cat&loS (OLUC) Da~abame 23 Updated Daily CODE PRODUCT CON 1660 Corme~tTimc EPC 1662 Practice Databas~ (923) EPC 1609 $DI Record CharJan EPC 1610 Format I artlie EPC 1611 Format I Offline EPC 1612 Format 20nlie* EPC 1613 Format 20fflie* 1614 Format 30nlie EPC 1615 Format 3 Offlie EPC 1616 Forma~ 40nlie* EPC 1617 Format 4 Offlie* EPC 1620 Format 5 Onli~ EPC 1621 Format 5 Offlie EPC 1622 Format 60nlie EPC 1623 Format 60ffiic EPC 1624 Format ? artlie EPC 1625 Format ? Oftlie EPC 1626 Format 8 artlie EPC 1627 Format 8 Offline EPC 1630 Format 9 artlie* EPC 1631 Format 9 Offlie* EPC 1632 MYFORMAT artlie EPC 1633 MYFOP, MAT Oillie EPC 1640 User Selected Form Oaline EPC 16,Sl Usa Selected Formats Oillie Display Lis~ is available at no charge *Contais OCLC haldigs Rarereact Scrvicu - EPIC Dazabuu Put H, Section A, Page 36 NON-MEMBER MEMBER PRICE PRICE $95.00 $40.00 per hour $10.00 $10.00 per hour $2.00 S2.00 each $0.05 $0.05 each $0.05 $0.05 each $0.40 $0. tO each $0-40 $0. tO each $0-40 $0. tO each $0.40 $0, tO esch $0.75 $0.10 each $0.75 $0. I 0 $0-7f $0.10 $0.?~ $0. I0 each $0-75 $0. I0 each $0.75 ~. I0 ~ch ~.7~ ~. I0 ~. I0 $0.10 ~. lO ~. 10 ~. I0 Issm~l April 27. 1994 140 PAlS International Database 2 Updated Monthly CODE PRODUCT CON 5470 Comtect Time CON 5471 Practice Database (9432) EPC 5472 SDI Fee APPENDEX 1 Reference Services - EPIC Databasu Effective July 1. 1994 Record Charles EPC 5473 Format I On/be EPC 5474 Format I Offline EPC 5475 Format 20nllne* EPC 5476 Format 20t'fi~e® EPC 5475 Format 30n/ine EPC 5476 Format 30fl~ine EPC 5477 Format 5 On/ins EPC 5478 Format S Of~iae EPC 5479 Format 70nl ine EPC 5480 Format 70t~line EPC 5477 Format 90n/ine® EPC 5478 Format 90ffijne* EPC 548I MYFORaMAT Online EPC 5482 MYFOIL~fAT Offline EPC 5483 User Selected Formats On/ine EPC 54~ User Selected For~-,, Offiine Display List is available at no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rct'crencc Services - EPIC Databases Pert !l. Section A. Page 37 PRICE $450.00 per hour $10.00 per hour $7.00 each $0.75 each ~0.75 uch S0.75 each S0.75 each $0.75 each S0.75 each S0.75 each Issued Aprg 27. 1994 141 Pcricxtic. aJ Abstracts Database 29 UIxlate~ W~cl~y APPENDIX I Rercrcnec Services - EPIC Databases Effective July I. 1994 CODE CON CON EPC PRODUCT 1675 Connect Timc 1676 Practice Database (929) 1920 SDI Fee Record Charges EPC i 908 EPC 1909 EPC 1910 EPC 1911 EPC 1910 EPC 1911 EPC 1912 EPC 1913 EPC 1914 EPC 1915 EPC 1912 EP~ 1913 EPC 1916 EPC 1917 EPC 1918 EPC 1919 Format I Online Forrot I Offiine Format 20nlinc* Format 20ffiine* Format 30nline Format 30ffiine Format 50nline Format S Offline Format 70nline Format 7 Oilline Format 90nline* Format 90ffiine* MYFORMAT Online MYFOILMAT Offiirm User Selected Formats Onliae User Selected Formats Offiine Display List is available :t no charge. *Contains OCLC holdings Rcrercnc~ Services - EPIC Databases Pan II. Section A. Page 38 PRICE $60.00 per hour S10.00 per hour $3.00 each $0.05 esch $0.05 esch $0.~) each ,$0.4~ each ~.40 each ~.40 ~ach $0.7S uch S0.7S ~ch ~.7~ ~h ~.75 ~ch ~.75 ~ch ~ch ~ch ~0.75 uch ~.75 ~c~ Issued April 27. 1994 142 APPENDIX I Reference Servicca - EPIC Effective hly 1. 1994 Phermaceutica~ News Index (PNI) Database 40 Updated CODE PRODUCT CON 1671 Connect TLmo CON 1672 Practice Database (940) EPC 18J,6 $DI F~ Record Charlee EPC 1847 Format I Online EPC 1848 Format I Offiine EPC 1851 Former 2 EPC 1852 Form~ 20tl~c* EPC 1851 Format 3 EPC 1852 Form~ 30f~ine EPC 1855 Form~ 50nUne EPC 1856 Format 50ffiine EPC 1855 Format 90nline* EPC 1856 Format 90ffiine* EPC 18~5 MYFORMAT Oniine EPC 1866 MYFORMAT Offllne EPC 1867 U~er Sele:ted Formats Oniine EPC 1868 User Selected Formats Offiine Display List is available at no charSe. *Contains OCLC holdLqgs Reference Servica - EPIC Databases Part II, Section A, Page 39 PRICE $1(X).Q0 per hour S10.00 p=r hour S9.00 each I0.75 ~ch 10.75 each 10.75 each 10.75 each 10.75 each Issued April 27, 1994 PsycINFO Da~bas~ 2 Ulxtat~ Monthly APPEND[:( 1 Reference Services - EPIC Databeau Effective July 1, 1994 CODE CON CON EPC PRODUCT 5569 Connect TLme 5570 Practice Detabes~ (903) 5571 SDI Fec Record Chatge~ EPC 5572 EPC 5573 EPC: 55'74 EPC 5575 EPC 5574 EPC 5575 EPC 5576 EPC 55T7 EPC 5578 EPC 5579 EPC 5576 EPC 55TT EPC 5580 EPC 558 i EPC 5582 EPC 5583 Format I On/L~e Format I Offime Format 2 On/i-e* Format 2 Format 3 Format 30ffiLne Format 5 Format 50t'fiine Format 7 Format 70tlL~e Format 90t~Liae* Format 90ffiiae* MYFORMAT On/in¢ MYFOR~MAT Ot'fline User S¢lected Formats O~i,~¢ User Selected Formats Offl. in¢ Display List is available at no charge. *Contaias OCLC holdinSs Rct'crcncc Scrvicu - EPIC Databases Part If. Section A, Page 40 PR/CE S~.00 per hour $10.00 p<:r hour S2.00 each S0.05 each $0.05 each $0.40 each $0.40 each $0.40 each S0.40 em:h $0.75 each S0.75 each ~.75 ~.75 ~ch ~.75 ~.75 ~ch Issued Aprn 27. 1994 Readers' Guide Abs~racu Database 26 LrFiated Mont~y APPENDIX 1 Rcrcreaea Servicu - EPIC Databin Effeative July 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 5420 Conneu Tim CON 5421 Practice Detabue (926) EPC: 5434 SD[ Fee Reeotd Chatgel EPC 5422 Format I O~iae EPC 5423 Format I Offliae EPC 5424 Format 20nliae* EPC 54Z.~ Forrot 20ttline* EPC 5424 Former 30nllae EPC 5425 Format 30fa i~e EPC 5426 Format 50aliae EPC 5427 Format 50ffliae EPC 5428 Format 70aliae EPC 5429 Format 70ftliae EPC 5426 Form~ 90rdiae* EPC 5427 Format 90ffT~Ee* EPC 5430 MYFORMAT Oaliae EPC 5431 MYFOR. MATOffliae EPC 5432 U~er Se|eeted Formau O~liae EPC 5433 User Selected Formv~ Of Eiae Dbpiay Lis~ b avaiXable st no charge. *Cone-izLs OCLC holdL-tp Refcreace - EPIC Daeabuea Pan rl. Section A, Page 41 PI~CE .$30.00 per hour S10.00 per hour .$t.O0 each $0.05 each $0.05 each $0.40 each $0.40 eech $0.40 each $0.40 each ~.75 each $0.75 each :$0.75 each $0.7:~ each $0.75 each $0.7~ each $0.75 each :$0.75 each :$0.75 each iuued April 27. 1994 APPENDIX 1 Rcfercnce Scrvie.~s - EPiC Databa.~a Effo:tlve July 1. 1994 Readers' Guide to Pcriocli~sl Literature Database 27 Ulxlatexi Monr.~ly CODE PRODUCT CON .5~02 Corm~:t Time CON 5403 Practice Database (927) EPC 5414 5DI Fee Record Chtrgea EPC 5404 Forst EPC 5405 Format EPC 5406 Format EPC 5407 Format EPC 5406 Format EPC ;5407 Format EPC 5408 Format EPC .$409 Format EPC 5408 Format EPC 5409 EPC ,~I0 EI~ 541 l EPC EPC 5413 I Oniine I OffiL~e 20nZiae* 20ffiiae* 30niine 30ffiine S Onllnc 50ffiine 90nline* Format 90ffiine* MYFORMAT Online MYFORMAT Offiine User Sale. oral Formats Online User Selected Formats Offiine Display List is evaLiable at no charge, *Contains OCLC holdings Rcfcrcnc~ Setvicar - EPIC Databases Part H, Section A, Page 42 PRICE $20.00 per hour Sl0.OO per hour $1.O0 each $0.05 uch $0.05 each S0.40 each $0.4~ uch $0.40 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each issu~l April 27, 1994 S<x:iml Sciences Index Databas~ 4 Ulxlared Monthly APPENDIX ! Rdcrenc~ Services - EPIC Databases Effective July !, 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 5535 Connect Time CON 5536 Practice Database (904) EPC 5537 SDI Fea Record Chatgea EPC 5538 Format I On/ine EPC 5539 Fortnat I Offline EPC 5540 Format 20nline* EPC 5541 Format 20ffiinc* EPC 5540 Forme~ 30nliae EPC 5541 Form~ 30nli~ EPC 5542 Format S Onllne EPC 5543 Format 5 Oilline EPC 5544 Format 70nline EPC 5545 Format 7 Offline EPC 5542 Format 90nline* EPC 5543 Format 9 Offlinet EPC 5546 MYFOR~AT Online EPC 5541 MYFORMAT Oilline EPC 5548 User Selected Form-L, Online EPC ~549 User S~lecced Formats Offlie Display L~ is available s~ no chsrlg. *Contains OCLC holdinSs Reference Scrvicu - EPIC Daishues Put !I. ~e-e_-'jon A, Page 43 PRICE $30.00 p~r hour $10.00 per hour $1.00 each $O.05 each $O.05 each S0.40 each $O.40 each $0.40 each $O.4O ~ch $O.75 W.b $O.75 each $O.75 each $O.75 cech $0.75 each I0.75 sit I0.75 each $O.75 uch $0.75 uch $O.75 each Issued April 27, 1994 APPENDD: I Rcrcrence Serviccs - EPiC Dazabu,~ Effective July i. 1994 Sociological Abstracts Database 7 Updated 5 times/year CODE PRODUCT CON 5520 CoMect Tizne CON 5521 Practice Database (907) EPC 5522 SDI Fc~ Record Charges EPC 5523 Format I Onliac EPC 5524 Format t Offline EPC 5525 Format 30niiae EPC 5526 Format 30ffliae EPC 5527 Format 50~ine EPC 5528 Format 5 EPC 5529 MYFOR.MAT O~liae Elc~ 5530 MYFOR~MAT Of~inc EPC 5531 User Selectc~ Formats EPC 5,~32 User Select~ Formats Display List is available at no charge. Reference Scrvicta - EPIC Databees Part II, Section A, Page 44 PRICE $,SO.QO per hour $10.00 per hour $3.00 each $0.05 each $0.05 =ach $0.442 each $0.40 uch $(2.75 each ~.75 ~h ~.7~ ~.75 ~ch ~.75 ~ch ~.75 ~ch Issued Aprn 27, 1994 148 Witson Busincss Abstracts Database 32 Updated Monr~y APPENDIX I Rcirerenc~ Services - EPIC Detab-_,~_ Effective July 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CON 5453 Connect Time CON 5454 Practice Datahue (932) EPC 5455 SD[ Fee Record Charges EPC 5456 Forme I Oatline EPC 5457 Format I Offline EPC 5458 Format 20niine* EPC 5459 Format 2 Offline* EPC 5458 Format 30nline EPC 5459 Format 3 Offline EPC 5460 Format S Oatline EPC 5461 Format 5 OfflS EPC 5462 Format 70nline EPC 5463 Format 7 Offline EPC 5460 Format 90nline® EPC 5461 Format 90ffiine* 54~, MYFORA4AT O,d~ne EPC 5465 ~YFOR.~4AT Offibte EPC 5466 U,er Selected Formats EPC 5467 User Selected Forages Reference S~rvicu - EPIC Databases Pert H. *~,~'*-*jon A. Page 45 PRICE S-tO.00 per hour Sl0.OO per hour $2.00 each .$0.05 each ~.05 each $O.40 each ~.40 each 11.40 each $0.4O each $0.75 each $0.75 each S0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each $0.75 each II.75 each $0.75 each 11.75 each $0.75 each Display List is available et no charge. *Contains OCLC holclinSs luu~d April 27. 1994 FIRSTSE,ad~.CH (1) OPEN SEARCHF~ CODE iTS 1989 iTS 1990 FTS 199 1 FTS 1992 iTS 1993 iTS 1994 # of Blocks I - 2-9 10-19 20 - 39 40 - 79 80 * CARD SEARCHES APPENDIX 1 Reference Services - FirstSearch Catalog Effective July !, 1994 # of Searches 5C0 1.000- 4.500 5.000- 9.500 10.0CO- 19.$00 :20.000 - 39.500 40JXX)* CODE I of Blocks # of Searches iTS 5289 I 500 iTS 5290 2 - 9 1.0C~ - 4.500 FTS 5291 10-19 ~.000- 9.500 iTS 5292 20 - 39 10,000 - 19,500 FTS 5293 40 - 79 20.000 - 39.500 FTS 5294 80 * 40.000 * (1) Notra on FirstScatch Per-Starch Priam a. Prices listed in U.$. Doilars. Reference Services - Firs#Search Pan II, ~-:__,_ion A. Page 4~ U.S. Range of PriedSearch Total ($) $0.90 $0.80 $800 - $ 3.600 $0.70 $3.500 - $ 6,650 $0.60 $6.CXX) - $11.700 $0.55 $1 i.O(X) - $21.725 $0.50 $20.CXX) U.S. RanBe of P~cdSear~ Total ($) $0.80 $800 - $ $0.?0 $3..500 - $ 6.650 $0.60 $6.0~) - $11 .?00 $0.~5 $1 ! .000 - $21.725 $0.50 $20.000 '- b, Search cards issued through June 30, 1993. will bc 8ood for three years end wl]l have a 3-year cxpi. ration date printed on them. Search Cuds issued July 1. 1994 end after will be 8ood for two years and will have a 2-year expiration date Finted on them. Open searches have two-year lifespan from the date of purchase. Refunds on purchases will. after July I. 1994. be made only within the f'~st 30 days after purchase. This brings FirstSearch per-search in line with other OCLC pro<lucts and eliminates year-end (June) refunds. Open s~arches will be accounted for on a FIFO basis. Searches not used within the lifespan will be lost. Issued April 27. 1994 150 CODE CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON CON APPENDIX i Rc[ereace Scrvict, e - FitstSe&rch EITeetive July !. 1994 PRODUCT IS84 Fs conaect - AGRICOLA 15.~3 FS Conaect - Applied SCi & Tech Index 1951 'FS Connect - ArticleFh. s~ 1521 FS Co~ne~.t - Art Index 5279 FS Connect - Arts & Hum Search 1956 FS Cormact - laioStaphy Index 1499 F$ Coemect - Bioi & As Index 5227 FS Connect - Biololy DiSeat 1979 FS Connect - BIOSIS/F$ 1581 F$ Cosmeet - Beeit Raytee Dipst 1455 FS Connet - BuslneuNews ~ ~49 F$ Connect - Buss Oqs 1974 FS Connect - Bus Pat~odlcaI ladex I256 FS Connect - Conebe Columbia Encyl 1953 FS Coaaect - Coacbe Eagiaec~s ladex I981 FS Cornmet - Coasumers ladeat 1950 FS Connect - CoateatsFi/~ 1947 FS Connect - Diglexure 1503 FS Connet - Educatioa Index 1985 FS Connet - ERIC 5276 FS Connect - EvemLine 1940 FS Connet - FactSeea~ 5282 FS Connect - Gea Science Index 1982 FS Connet - GPO 1986 F$ Connet - Humaz~ties l.ndex 1474 FS Connect - INSPEC 1572 FS Connet - LibraT Lieeratura 1498 FS Connect - MEDLINE 1493 FS Connect - Microcomputer Abstreeu 1944 FS Comma - MLA 1978 FS Connet - Newspaper Abm-ecu 1972 FS Connet - PAlS Decade 1977 FS Connet - Periodical Abm~tz 1952 FS Coanet - PsycFIRST 1975 FS Conaeet - Readers' Guide 1976 FS Connect - Rueden' Guide Abstracts 1954 FS Connect - Social Scieace Index 1955 FS Connet - SacioAbs 1973 FS Connet - W'~soa Bus Abstracts 1983 FS Connet - WorldCat 1332 FS Connet - Worldscope Rcl'crcnce Services - FLrstSearch Ptrt H. Section A. Page 47 PRICE SO.OO Per hour SO.00 Per hour SO.00 Pcr hour SO.OO Per hour SO.Q0 Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.OO Per hour S0.OO Per hour SO.OO Per hour $0.(30 Per bur ;$0.(30 Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.00 Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.CO Per hour SO.OO Par hour SO.OO Per hour SO.IX) Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO,OO Per hour SO.00 Per hour SO.00 Per hour SO.00 Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.IX) Per hour SO.00 Per hour SO.O(3 Per hour SO.(30 Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.O0 Per hour SO.00 Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.OO Per hour SO.IX) per hour SO.OO Per hour Issued April 27. 1994 151 CODE FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS ITS ITS FTS ITS FTS ITS ITS ITS FTS ITS ITS ITS FTS FTS ITS FTS ITS ITS ITS ITS FTS ITS FTS FTS ITS 1585 1554 5237 1522 5280 5248 1334 529_5 1971 1582 1456 5275 1960 12~ 5242 1969 5234 19,&8 1504 1967 5277 1941 5283 1968 1957 1475 1571 1945 1964 1958 1963 5239 1961 1962 5245 5246 1959 1965 1506 ,admPENDD( I Rcf~r~n~ Servir,~s - Fi:st.~.a~ch Effective July 1, 1994 PRODUCT FS Open Searchu - AGRICOLA FS Open Scarch. u - Applied Sci l Tecl~ [~dcx · ,FS Open Surehas - AtticlcFirs~ FS Open Searches - ~ Index FS Opec Searches - ~rt~ & Hum Search FS Open Surehes - BioSrq~hy Index FS Open S~erehu - Biol & Ag Index FS Open Searchu - Biolo~ l:)iScst FS Open Search. - BIOSIS/FS FS Open S,'~r~hea - Book Review Digc~ FS Offn S~rehcs - Bu~c~Ncws FS O~n Surchcs - Bu~ca Orp FS Offn S~:hu - B~ Pcri~i~s ~dcx FS O~n Sur~hu - Concig Columb~ h~! FS O~n Sut~s - ConG~ ~g~t~8 ~dex FS OFn SurGhu - Consume. FS OFn S~r~hu - ContcutsF~ FS O~n S~r~hu - D~losurc FS OFn SurGhu - Education Index FS O~ Surchu - E~C FS OFn SurGhu - EventL~e FS OFn Su~hu - Fa~Sur~ FS O~n SurG~u - ~n S~icnGc ~dex FS O~n SurGhu - G~ FS ~n SurGhea - Humantics ~dex FS O~ Sutchu - [NSPEC FS O~n S~rchu - Libra~ Literature FS O~n Surchu - MEDLINE FS OFn SutGhea - Micr~omputer Ab~ta~ts FS O~n Surch. - MLA FS ~n Surehas - New~a~t ~stra~u FS O~n Sur~hes - P~S D~adc FS O~n Surchu - P~cFIRST FS O~n Surchu - Ruders' Gu~e FS O~n Surchu - Rudcrs' Guide ~raGu FS O~n SurGhu - ~ ~ience ~dcx FS OFn Surchu - S~io~s FS O~n SurGh. - WHen Bus FS O~ Surges - WorldCat Reference Services - Firs~Scarch Part II, Section A. Page PR/CE S0.00 each S0.00 each SO.00 each S0.00 each $0.CX) each S0.00 each $0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each SO.00 each S~.O0 each SO.gO each $O.O0 each SO.O0 each $0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each ~.CN3 each S0.00 each S0.00 each $0.(X3 each SO.O0 each SO.O0 each ~.00 each SO.O0 each :$0.(30 each :$0.00 each :$O.O0 each $0.00 each $O.O0 each :$0.00 each $0.00 each ~).O0 each Issued April 27. 1994 152 CODE FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS EPC FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS FTS 1586 1555 5236' 1523 5281 5249 1500 5226 5271 1583 1457 5274 5260 1255 5243 5269 5235 1939 1505 5267 5278 1942 5268 5250 I476 1570 1510 1495 1946 5273 5258 5272 5240 5261 5262 5244 5247 5265 1333 APPENDIX 1 Rctrcrcncc Scrvicu - FirstSctrch Effective !uty !, 1994 PRODUCT FS Card Searches - AGRICOLA FS Card Searches - Applied Sci & Tcch Index FS Card Searchea - Az~icleFir,e FS Card Sea~hea - Art Index FS Card Searches - Arts & Hum Index FS Card Searchea - Biography Index FS Card Searches - Biol & AI Index FS Card Searches - Biology Dilest FS Card Searches - BIOSIS/FS FS Card Searches - Book R~view Digest FS Card Searches - BusinessNews FS Card Sear~es - Business Ores FS Card Searches - Bus Periodicals Index FS Card Searches - Concise Columbia Encyl FS Card Searchs - Concise Engineering Index FS Card Searches - Consumers Index FS Card Searches - ContentsFint FS Card Searches - Discleaurc FS Card Searcbt, s - Education Index FS Card Searches - EP, JC FS Card Searches - EventLine FS Card Searches - FactSearch FS Card Searches - Gen Science Index FS Card Searches - GPO FS Card Searches - Humanities Index FS Card Searches - INSPEC FS Card Searches - Library Literature FS Card Searches - MEDLINE FS Card Searches - Microcomputer Abstncts FS Card Searches - ML.A FS Card Searches - Newspaper Abstracts FS Card Searches - PAlS Decade FS Card Searches - Periodical Abstracts FS Card Searches - PsycFtRST FS Card Searcites - Readers' Guide FS Card Seardies - Readers' Guide Abstracts FS Card Searches - Social Science Index FS Card Searches - SocioAbs FS Card Searches - W'dson Business Abstracts FS Card Searches - WorldCat FS Card Searches - Worldscope Reference Servir. gs - FirstSearch Put H, Section A, Page 49 PRJCE $0.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 each S0.00 cub SO.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 each S0.00 each SO.(X) each SO,O0 esch $0.00 each ~,00 each ~O.CX) esch ~.~ each ~).CX) each S0.00 each SO.O0 esch SO.O0 etch · :).OO each SO,O0 each $0.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each SO.O0 each ~0.00 each $0.00 each SO.O0 each ~0.00 each ~0.00 each ~0.00 each S0.00 each Issued, April 27, 1994, 15,3 CODE FTS 15S0 FTS 1543 FTS 1512 ITS 1544 ITS 1538 FTS 1545 ITS 1525 ITS 1539 ITS 1458 ITS 1526 ITS 1546 ITS 1253 ITS 1549 ITS 1574 ITS 1514 ITS 157,$ ITS 1540 FTS 157g ITS 1516 ITS 1576 ITS t532 ITS 1518 ITS 1533 FTS 1477 ITS 1542 ITS 1497 ITS 1496 ITS 1530 FTS 1527 ITS 1531 ITS 1551 ITS 1536 ITS 1529 ITS 1534 ITS 1548 ITS 1579 ITS 1507 APPENDIX I Rcfcrcne~ Services - FirstSearch Effa:tive July 1. 1994 PRODUCT FS Subscription Searches - AGRICOLA FS Subscription Searches - Applied Sci& Tech Index 1:S Subscription Searches - A,'ticlcFirst FS Subscription Searches - Art Index FS Subscription Scarches- Biography lndax FS Subscription Searches - Biol & Ag Index FS Subscription Searches - Biology Digest FS Subscription Searches - Book Review Digest FS Subscription Searches - BusiaessNcws FS Subscription Scm'ches - Bustam Orgs FS Subscription Searches - Bus Pcriedicals Index FS Subscription Searches - Concise Columbia Encyl FS Subscription Scarchcs- Concise Eng~earing Index FS Subscription Searches - Consumers Lm:lex F$ Subscription Searches - CoatcntsFLrst FS Subscription Searclma FS Subscription Searchea FS Subscription Searchca F$ Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscrilxion Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Seatchea FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches FS Subscription Searches Disclosure Education L~dex ER/C EventLine FactSearch Gea Scicace ~dcx G~ Hu~ities hdex ~SPEC Libra~ Literature MEDLINE M~r~mputer ~ra~ News~r ~a~ P~S PsycFl~T Rudcn' Guile ~io~s ~d~n Bus ~nam WorldCat World~ Rct'erenea Servi~cs - FirszSeanh Pan fl. Seaion A. Page 50 PRICE $O.00 each S0.00 each $0.(30 each SO.OO each $43.00 each $O.00 each S0.00 each SO.O0 each $C).00 each ~0.00 each S0.00 each S0.CX) each ~0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each SO.O0 each S0.00 each SO.CX} each $0.00 each SO.O0 each S0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each $0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each Issued ApriZ 27. 1994 APPENDIX l Rcfcreace Scrvicu - FirstScatch Effective July I, 1994 CODE PRODUCT FS K-12 Tr~ Progreta FTS 1348 FS Card - Schools FTS 1349 FS Open - Schools CON 1986 FS Open Searches ~is Mont~ FTS 1987 FS Open Seer~J~es - Acljus~menu FTS 1988 FS Open Special Offer Searches FTS :5286 FS Open Searches this Mottt~ FTS :5287 FS Card Searches - Adjustmenu FTS :5288 FS Cud Special Offer Searches FTS 529:5 FS Cerd initial Autho Fee FTS 5297 FS Cerd Additional Autho Fee FTS 1996 FS Open Initial AurJ%o Fee FTS 1997 FS Open Additionad Autho Fee EPC 1998 FS Annual Fee - Nott-memben FTS 1:520 FS Subscription (1) For options Rcrcrcacc Servicu - Firs~Surch Pen II, Sect]on A. Pege 51 PRICE $0.50 each SO.SO each (1) ~0.(X) each S0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 each S0.00 eech SO.00 each $0.00 each $37.50 each S0.00 $37.50 each S0.00 per year Varies per yeer sad prices. sec the U.S. Price List for Annual Subscriptions for individual institutions (PILM28ZS) luued April 27. I994 APPENDIX 1 Rcrcrcficc Services - ContcntsAlctt Effcctivc July 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT CONTENTSALERT EPC 1491 ContentsAJert Direct 1:'PC 1490 ContentsAlert Distributed EPC 1492 ContentsA.tert AdmLnLstration Rcrcrcncc Scrvicea - ContentsAlert Part II. Section A. Page 52 PRICE $4.00 each $14.00 each $~43.C~ Initial Fee luued April 27. 1994 156 CODE ACCF,~S NTC 1601 CON 1602 CON 1603 CON CON 160~ CON CON CON CON 5253 CON CON CON CON CON SERVICE E~ E~ EPC OTHER NEW BIN PRODUCT APPENDIX I Reference Services - Miscclleacous Effective July 1, 1994 ,EPIC Access Multidrop Dedicated Line EPIC Access CompuScrve EPIC Acceu OCLC Direct Dial-Dublin EPIC Acccu OCLC 800 Dial-Acccu EPiC A~m Lqtern,.e EPIC Accus OCLC HUB Dial-Acceu EPIC Acgu$ TLP FirstSearch Acccu Multidrop Dedicated Line FLrstSear~h Access CompuServc FirstSear~ Ac~eu OCLC Direct Dial-Dublin FirstSearch A,:cess OCLC 8430 Dial Ac~eu FLrstSearch Access lnteme~ PLrstSearch Access OCLC HUB Dial-Aceau FirstSearch Access TLP FEES 1702 Saved Search Charge Monthly 1704 Printing Fee Support Detti/ 1705 Annual EPIC Subscription Fee ANnual EPIC Subscription Fea 1706 PostaBe, Per Offiinc Order 8136 OCLC Reference News/6 issues 936.S EPIC CBT Rcfcren~ Servic.~s - Misc~Haaeous Part I1. ;-~-Aon A, Page 53 PRICE SO.00 /rain. S0.0OO ~.. $0.115 /rain. $6.90/~,. :$0.03 /rain. SI.80/~u'. $0.15 Imin. S9.60 No charBe $0.115 /min. $6.90/hr. $0.115/rain. $6.90/lu-. SO.03 /rain. $1.80/hr. $0,16/mia. $9.50 /hr. S0. I t5 /rain. $6.90/'at. $0.00/rain. Sl.00 each $10.00 per month $37.50 per year/member $75.CX3 per year/non-member S0.29 per order S0.00 per year S6.00 each !uued April 27. 1994 157 APPENDIX I OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC Reference Services - EPIC International Access Part II, Section A, Page 54 ~ EPIC EPIC INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL DIAL ACCESS DIAL ACCESS PRODUCT PRICE PRICE CODE DESCRIPTION PER MINUTE PER HOUR CON1368 INTERNATIONAL DA PRE-PAID CON1369 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE A CON1370 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE B CON1371 INTEKNATIONAL DA-RATE C CON1372 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE D CON1373 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE E CONI374 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE F No Charge from OCLC $0,180 $10.80 $0,283 $16.98 $0,433 $2S.98 $0.550 $33.00 $0.716 $42.96 $0.883 552.98 Descriotion International Dial Access Pre-Paid World-wide access to Compuserve originating from International Record Carriers TRT, MCII, and AT&T. Access is pre-paid by the user to the carrier. International bial Access Rate A Access to Compuserve originating from Compuserve, Datapat, Sprintnet, or Tymne= locations in Canada International Dial Access Rate B Access =o Compuserve originating from Belgium (Compuserve), France (Compuserve), France (TRANSPAC), Germany (Compuserve}, Germany (Datex-P), Mexico {Infonet), The Netherlands (Compuserve), Switzerland (Compuserve), Switzerland (Telspat), United Kingdom (Compuserve), United Kingdom (Mercury 5000), United Kingdom (GNS Dialplus), and Europe (Infonet) locations. International Dial Access Rate C Access to Compuserve originating from Australia and New Zealand (FALNET), Guam (PAtNET), Guam (Sprintnet), Guam (Tymnet}, Hong Kong (Compuserve), and Japan (FENItS II), Puerto Rico (Sprintnet), Puerto Rico (Tymnet), Israel (Israkov), and South Korea (POSNET) locations. International Dial Access Rate D Access =o Compuserve originating from Taiwan (TTN-NET) and world-w~de access INFONET locations. International Dial Access Rate E Access to Compuserve originating from Japan (JENS) locations. International Dial Access Rate F Access to Compuserve originating world-wide from Sprintnet and Tymnet locations not otherwise listed separately. Issued April 27, 1994 158 APPENDIX 1 OCLC CHARGES: OCLC PACIFIC Reference - FirsUSearch Innernational Access Part II, Section A, Page 55 FIRSTSEARCH FIRSTSEARCH INTERNATZONAL INTERNATIONAL DIAL ACCESS DIAL ACCESS PRODUCT PRICE PRICE CODE DESCRIPTION PER HINUTE PER HOUR CON1375 INTERNATIONAL DA PRE-PAID CON1376 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE A CON1377 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE B CON1378 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE C CON1379 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE D CON1380 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE E CON1381 INTERNATIONAL DA-RATE F No Charge from OCLC $0.180 $10.80 $0,283 $16.98 $0.433 $25.98 $0.550 $33.00 $0.716 $42.96 $0.883 $52.98 Description International Dial Access Pre-Paid World-wide access to Compuserve originating from International Record Carriers TRT, MCII, and AT&T. Access is pre-paid by the user to the carrier. International Dial Access Rate A Access to Compuserve originating from Compuserve, Datapac, Sprintnet, or Tymnet locations in Canada International Dial Access Rate B Access =o Compuserve originating from Belgium (Compuserve), France (Compuserve), France (TRANSPAC), Germany (Compuserve), Germany (Datex-P), Mexico (Infone=), The Netherlands (Compuserve), Switzerland (Compuserve), Switzerland (Telepac), United Kingdom (Compuserve), United Kingdom (Mercury 5000}, United Kingdom (GNS Dialplus), and Europe (InfoneU) locations. International Dial Access Rate C Access =o Compuserve originating from Australia and New Zealand (FALNET), Guam (PACNET), Guam (Sprintnet), Guam (Tymnet), Hong Kong (Compuserve), and Japan (FENICS II}, Puerto Rico (Sprintnet}, Puerto Rico (Tymnet), Israel (Israkov), and South Korea (POSNET) locations. International Dial Access Rate D Access =o Compuserve originating from Taiwan (TTN-NET) and world-wide access to INFONET locations. International Dial Access Rate E Access =o Compuserve originating from Japan (JENS) locations. International Dial Access Rate f Access =o Compuserve originating world-wide from Sprintnet and Tymnet locations not onherwise listed separately. Issued April 27, 1994 159 CODE PRODUCT OCLC SITESEARCH SIS FTS SSS SSS SSS (!) C2) C3) APPEND[3( I Sot~wuc Producu - OCLC Site,qeuch . Effective July 1, 1994 5995 OCLC SiteSarch Licens~ Fee 1999 'OCLC SiteS~arch - MonthJy Suplx>rt Fee 5996 OCLC SiteSearch - ,6,m~ua/Support Fee 5993 OCLC SiteSearch - Mont~y Database Prep 5994 OCLC SiteSearch - A.'mual Database Prep License fee i~cludes system documentation. user documentation. and two (2.) days of i~suHation with t~air, i~g. Sortware maintenance included. MonthJy billing or atmuai fee. Sotn~ware Products - OCLC girt. Search Part H. Se~on B. Page 56 PRICE (!) Charges vat~ (2&3) 15~-20% orpurchase price (2) 15~-20S or'purchase price (3) Charges vary Charges vary luu~d April 27, 199~ APPENDIX 1 Sobere Prodm:~ - OCLC Gateway Effective July 1. 1994 CODE PRODUCT OCLC GATEg/AY SOF 9303 OCLC Gateway Software - License Fee RCM 9304' OCLC Gateway So/tware - Mab'ttenance Fee Software Products - OCLC Gateway Part I1, Section B, Page 57 PPJCE $16,000.00 I5~ oF Purchase Price luued April 27. 1994 161 CODE CATALOGING MAN 8104 MAN 8069 BIN 8073 MAN 8165 MAN 8103 MAN 8331 MAN 8341 MAN 8221 MAN 8151 MAN 8399 MAN 8133 MAN 8367 MAN 8081 MAN 8661 MAN 8662 MAN 8663 MAN 8664 MAN 8369 MAN 8122 MAN 8014 MAN 8201 TITLE i:X:X;UMENTATION (1) AuthOrities User Guide Bibllographic Formats and Standards (includes MAN8399) CAT CD450 Documentation Package CAT ME Plus User Guide Cataloging User Guide CJK35C~lnput Code Dictionary, Vol 1, Chinese, pt. 1 CJK350 Input Code Dictionary, Vol 1, Chinese, pt. 2 CJK350 Input Code Dictionary, Vol 2, JaC~anese CJK350 Input Code Dictionary, Vol 3, Korean Concise Input Standards Diecritics and Special Characters Diecritics and Special Characters--Updates OCLC-MARC Code Lists OCLC-MARC Distril:)ution Service, 1st ed. 1971-1976 Dec 31 OCLC-MARC SuOscription Service, 2d KI. 1977 Jan 2-ca- 1978 Apt OCLC-MARC Subscription Service, 3d ed. ca 1978 Apt-ca. 1981 Jan & RETROARC 1971-1980 Dec OCLC-MARC Sul:~scril~tion Service, 4th ed. ca 1981 Jan-1984 Sep 30, plus manuscripts records to 1985 Apt 21 OCLC-MARC Tape and Exl;)ort Record Formats--UCx:lates OCLC-MARC Tape and Export. Record Formats 1990 Nov-Current OCLC-MARC T~oe Format, 2d ed. 1989 F~o-1990 June OCLC-MARC Tape Formit. ca 1984 Se0t-1989 COMMUNICATIONS & ACCESS D(X:;UMENTATION (1) MAN 8197 MAN 8370 MAN 8182 MAN 8366 MAN 8345 MAN 8429 MAN 8042 MAN 8160 MAN 8155 MAN 8075 MAN 8045 MAN 8427 MAN 8110 ASCII Terminal Guide to the PRISM Service ASCII Terminal Guide to the PRISM Service--Updates OCLC Communications & Access Planning Guide OCLC Gateway Software User Guide OCLC Gateway Software System Administrator Guide OCLC Gateway Software Reference Card M310 Workstation User Guide M386sx Workstation User Guide M486sx/25 Workstation User Guide M386/16 WOrkStation User Guide M220 Terminal User Guide OCLC M48.6sx/25 and M486DX! Workstation User Guide PASSPORT Software User Guide DOCUMENTATION Etfective July 1, 1994 Part III, Page 1 PRICE $17.00 $25.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $39.00 $39.00 $26.00 $26.00 $3.00 $6.50 $3.00 S8.00 $11.00 $11.00 $11.00 $11.00 $6.00 $20.00 $18.00 $17.00 $6.00 $3.00 $5.00 $15.00 $15.00 $3.00 per set of 10 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 April 2"/. 162 .COOE TITLE GENERAL DOCUMENTATION (1) MAN 8320 Assessing Information On the Internet: TOward Providing Library Services for Computer-Mediated Communication MAN 8015 Audiovisual Material Glossary MAN 8121 Collected Papers, F. G. Kilgour. 2-volume set MAN 8035 Future 9f the Public Library:. Conference Proceedings MAN 8107 Guide to Searching the Online Union Catalog MAN 8372 Guide to Searching the Online Union Catalog- -Uixlatss MAN 8092 Integrated Planning for Campus Information Systems MAN 8210 Intellectual Prof:)erty Rights and Fair Use PAC 8392 OCLC Pocket Folder MAN 8011 Online Public Access Catalogs MAN 8086 OPACs and Beyond: Proceedings of a Joint Meeting British Library, DBMIST, & OCLC MAN 8065 Participating Institution~ by Institution Name MAN 8063 Participating InStitutions by Symbol (includes Supplement) MAN 8005 Planning in OCLC Member Libraries MAN 8071 Public Access Terminals MAN 8021 Public Library Ac:lminiStratOr'S Planning Guide to Automation MAN 8141 Subject ,Searching In Library Catalogs TBL 8066 Technical Bulletin Series MAN 8080 Telecommunications for Information Specialists MAN 8002 The Linked System Project: A Networking TOOl for Libraries MAN 8361 The Process of Subject Searching in the Library Catalog INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTATION (1) WSN 6503 OCLC Selected Titles for University and Research Libraries, One-year subscription. Add $,50 for Shipping and handling by air WSN 6504 OCLC Selected Titles for University and Research I, ibrariss. Two-year subscription. Add 650 for shipping and handling by air WSN 6505 OCLC Selected Titles for University and Research Libraries. Three-year subscription. Add $50 for Shipping and handling by air DOCUMENTATION Effective July 1, 1994 Part III, Page 2 PRICE S20.00 $8.50 $57.50 $13.50 $19.00 $6.00 $13.00 S7.50 $0.25 $18.00 $12.50 $6.00 $7.00 $16.50 $14.50 $12.50 $21.00 $10.00 S15.00 Sl 3.50 $7.00 S300.00 $575.O0 S650.00 April 2'/, 19~4 163 CODE TITLE ~EFERENCE SERVICES DOCUMENTATION (1) BIN 8252 CDP 6325 REF 8132 MAN. 8130 MAN 8129 EJO 7980 BIN 8405 EJO 7982 REF 8420 EJO 7983 REF 8407 MAN 8406 MAN 8409 REF 8419 EJO 7981 MAN 8410 MAN 8403 REF 8307 REF 8309 REF 8139 REF 8137 REF 8289 REF 8290 REF 8337 REF 8339 REF 8330 REF 8332 REF 8322 REF 8323 REF 8285 REF 8286 BIN 8127 REF 8377 REF 8379 REF 8279 REF 8280 REF 8334 REF 8335 REF 8239 REF 8237 REF 8113 REF 8115 REF 8342 REF 8343 REF 8180 REF 8179 REF 8295 Current CliniCal Trials User Guide DiscLit 1' Binder DiscLit Reference Cards DiscLit SeluO Guide DiscLit User Guide EJO AcCess Package for Windows EJO Binder EJO Electronics Letters Online Package EJO ELO Reference Card EJO EuroC}ean Access Package EJO Guidon for Windows Reference Card EJO Guidon for Windows User Guide EJO Internet Access Guide (Guidon for Windows) EJO OJCCT Reterence Card EJO Onllne Journal of Current Clinical Trials Package EJO Telecommunications Access Directory EJOIASCII User Guide EPIC A Matter of Fact Database Description EPIC A Matter of Fact Reference Card EPIC ABI/lnform Database Descril:}tion EPIC ABI/lnform Reference Card EPIC AGRICOLA Database Description EPIC AGRICOLA Reference Card EPIC Aide}lied Science & Technology Index Database DescriOtion EPIC Al~l~lied Science & Technology Index Reference Card EPIC An Index Database Descril~tion EPIC Art Index Reference Card EPIC ArticleFirst Database Description EPIC ArticleFirst Reference Card EPIC Arts & Humanities Search Database Descril~tion EPIC Arts & Humanities Search Reference Card EPIC Binder EPIC BiglAg Index Database Description EPIC Bio/Ag Index Reference Card EPIC Biography Index Database Description EPIC Biogral~hy Index Reference Card EPIC Biology Digest Database Description EPIC Biology Digest Reference Card EPIC BIgSIS Previews Database Descri;tion EPIC BIgSIS Previews Reference Card EPIC Book Data Database Description EPIC Book Data Reference Card EPIC Book Review Digest Datapase Description EPIC Book Review Digest Reference Card EPIC Business Dateline Database Description EPIC Business Dateline Reference Card EPIC Business Organizations Database Description D(:X::;UMENTATION Effective July 1, 19<~4 Par1 III. Page 3 PRICE S.40.00 $3.00 S3.00 $2.00 S20.00 $18.00 S2.00 $3.00 S0.30 S2.00 $0.30 S0.30 $1.00 $2.00 I~er set of 10 $3.00 I~er set of 10 $2.00 I~er set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 I~er set of 10 S3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 perset of 10 $2.00 per set ot 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $7.00 $2.00 )er set of 10 $3.00 }er set of 10 $2.00 }er set of 10 $3.00 )er set of 10 $2.00 ~er set of 10 S3.00 ~er set of 10 $2.00 )er set of 10 $3.00 ~er set of 10 $2.00 ~er set of 10 $3.00 )er set of 10 $2.00 ~er set of 10 $3.00 }er set of 10 $2.00 }er set of 10 $3.00 )et set of 10 $2.00 }er set of 10 April CODE REF 8296 REF 8245 REF 8246 REF 8300 REF 8302 REF 8215 REF 8216 REF 8325 REF 8326 REF 8157 'REF 8156 REF 8362 REF 8363 REF 8100 . REF 8102 REF 8315 REF 8316 REF 8203 REF 8204 REF 8233 'REF 8234 REF 8206 REF 8207 REF 8249 REF 8250 REF 8424 REF 8425 REF 8347 REF 8349 REF 8352 REF 8353 REF 8355 REF 8356 REF 8304 REF 8305 REF 8193 REF 8194 REF 8059 REF 8060 REF 8260 REF 8262 REF 8242 REF 8243 REF 8177 REF 8176 TITLE EPIC Business Organizations Reference Card EPIC Business Periodicals Index Datal~ase Descriplion EPIC Business Periodicals Index Rei'erence Card EPIC CompendexPlus Datal:)ase Description EPIC CompendexPlus Reference Card EPIC Consumers Index Database Description EPIC ~onsumers Index Reference Card EPIC ContentsFirst Database Description EPIC ContentsFirst Reference Card EPIC Dissertation Al~stracts Database Description EPIC Dimnation ADstracts Reference Card EPIC Education Index Database Description EPIC Education Inde~ Reference Card EPIC ERIC Database Descril2tion EPiC ERIC Reference Cm'd EPIC Eventline Oatal}ase Description EPIC Eventline Reference .Card EPIC General Science Index Database Description EPIC General Science Index Reference Card EPIC GeoRef Datal~ase Description EPIC GeoRef Reference Card EPIC GPO Monthly Catalog Database Description EPIC GPO Monthly Catalog Reference C~rd EPIC Humanities Index Database Description EPIC Humanities Inde~ Reference Card EPIC INSPEC Database Description EPIC INSPEC Reference Card EPIC Library Literature Datal~ase Description EPIC Library Literature Reference Card EPIC MEDLINE Database Description EPIC MEDLINE Reference Card EPIC Microcomputer Abstracts Database Description EPIC Microcomputer Abstracts Reference Card EPIC MLA Bibliography Database Description EPIC MLA Bibliography Reference Card EPIC Newspaper Ar~stracts Database Description EPIC Newspaper Abstracts Reference Ca~ EPIC Online Union Catalog Database Description EPIC Online Union Catalog Reference Card ERC PAlS International Database Description EPIC PAlS International Reference Card EPIC Periodical Abstracts Database Description EPIC Periodical Ab4tracts Reference Card EPIC PNI (Pharmaceutical News Index) Database Description EPIC PNI (Pharmaceutical News Index) Reference Card DOCUMENTATION Effective July 1, 1994 Part III, Page 4 PRICE $3.00 per set of 10 $2.(X) per set of 10 $3,00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 1Q $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 Persetofl0 $2.00 per set of 10 $3,00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3,00 per set oI 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 perset of 10 $2,00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2,00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $2,00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 [uucd Al~rtl 2/. 19x)4 165 CODE REF 8272 REF 8273 REF 8112 REF 8114 REF 8117 REF 8119 REF 8217 REF 8312 REF 8313 REF 8275 REF 8276 MAN 8010 AVM 8018 MAN 8023 REF 8256 REF 8257 REF 8224 REF 8294 REF 8340 REF 8333 MAN 8324 REF 8287 BIN 8225 REF 8380 REF 8282 REF 8336 REF 8236 REF 8344 REF 8247 REF 8297 REF 8346 REF 8303 REF 8229 MAN 8327 BIN 8172 REF 8299 REF 8359 MAN 8364 REF 8227 MAN 8317 REF 8310 REF 8209 REF 8230 REF 8255 REF 6426 REF 8350 REF 8354 TITLE EPIC PsyClNFO Database DescriDtion EPIC PSyClNFO Reference Card EPIC Readers' Guide Abstracts Database DescrilDtion EPIC Readers' Guide Abstracts Reference Card EPIC Readers' Guide to Periodical Literature DataOase DescrilDtion EPIC Readers' Guide to Periodical Literature Reference Card EPIC Service Reference Card EPIC Social Sciences Index Dalebase DescriDtion EPIC Social Sciences Index Reference Card EPIC Sociological Abstracts Database Description EPIC Sociological Abstracts Reference Card EPIC Training Manual EPIC Training Transparencies EPIC User Guide EPIC Wilson Business Abstracts Database De~riDtion EPIC Wilson Business Abstracts Reference Card FirstSearch Advanced Reference Card FirstSearch AGRICOLA Reference Card FirstSearch ADDlied Science & Technology Index Reference Card FirstSearch Art Index Reference Card FirstSearch ArticleFirst Reference Card FirstSearch Arts & Humanities $earclq Reference Card FirstSearch Binder FirstSearch Bio/Ag Index Reference Card FirstSearch BiograDhy Index Reference Card FirstSearch Biology Digest Reference Card FirstSearch BIOSIS/FS Reference Card FirstSearch Book Review Digest Reference Card FirstSearch Business Periodicals Index Reference Card FirstSearch BusinessOrgs Reference Card FirstSearch Concise Columbia Electronic EncycfolDedia Reference Card FirstSearCh Concise Engineering Index Reference Card FirstSearch Consumerlndx Reference Card FirstSearch ContentsFirst Reference Card FirstSearch Database Notebook and Database Cards FirstSearch Disclosure CorDorate ShaDshots Reference Card FirstSearch Dynamic Information CorlD. Document SuDiDlier Card FirstSearch Education Index Reference Card FirstSearch ERIC Reference Card FirstSearch Eventline Reference Card FirstSearch FactSearch Reference Card First Search General Science Index Reference Card FirstSearch GPO Reference Card FirstSearch Humanities Index Reference Card FirStSearch INSPEC Reference Card FirstSearch Libran/Literature Reference Card FirstSearch MEDLINE Reference Card DOCUMENTATION Effective July 1. 1994 Part III, Page 5 PRICE $2.00 }er set of $3.00 }er set of $2.00 }er set of $3.00 ;~er set of $2.00 ;~er set of $3.00 )er set of $3.00 }er set of $2.00 }er set of $3.00 }er set of $2.00 )er set of $3.00 )er set of $7.00 $3.00 $30.00 $2.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 Der set of 10 $3.00 IDer set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 IDer set of 10 $1.95 $3,00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.00 $3.50 $3.00 Der set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 IDer set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 IDer set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 Derset of 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 ::)er set of 10 :)er set of 10 :~er set of 10 :)er Set of 10 ;er set of 10 ~er set of 10 )st sat of 10 )er set of 10 }er set of 10 )er set of 10 }er set of 10 Ism=d Apdl ~/. 1994 CODE · REF 8357 REF 8306 REF 8195 REF 8263 REF 8244 REF 8274 MAN 8164 REF 8116 REF 8125 REF 8319 REF 8223 MAN 8314 REF 8277 MAN 8222 REF 8167 MAN 8190 REF 8259 REF 8226 REF 8389 REF 6412 RESOURCE MAN 8329 MAN 8149 MAN 8375 MAN 8374 MAN 8219 MAN 6456 MAN 8373 MAN 8642 MAN 8644 TITLE FirstSearch Microcomputer AbstraCts Reference Card FirstSearch MLA Bibliography Reference Card FirstSearch Newspaper AbStraCtS Reference Card FirstSearch' PAlS Decade Reference Card FirstSearch Periodical Abstracts Reference Card FirstSearch PSyclNFO Reference Card FirstS"earch QuickSearch Guide FirstSearch Readers' Guide Abstract Reference Card FirstSearch Readers' Guide to Periodicals Reference Card FirstSearch Reference Card, Subscription Version FirstSearch Reference Card FirstSearch Social Sciences Index Reference Card FirstSearch ScctoA!:}s Reference Card FirstSearCh System Guide FirstSearch UMI Article Clearinghouse Document Supplier Card FirstSearch User Guide FirstSearch Wilson Business Abstracts Reference Card FirstSearch WorldCat Reference Card FirstSearch Worldscope Reference Card OCLC EJOIASCII Reference Card SHARING DOCUMENTATION (1) ILL ME Plus User Guide. Manual only Interlibrary Loan User Guide Interlibrary Loan User Guide--Uixlates Name-Address Directory User Guide OCLC Guide to Presen/ation Data SharPAC User Guide Union List User Guide USNP National Union List. Members' price USNP National Union List. Nonmeml~ers' price DOCUMENTATION Effective July 1, 1994 Part III, Page 6 PRICE $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 $3.00 I}er set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.00 I~er set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.CX) per set of 10 63.00 per set of 10 $3.50 $3.00 per set of 10 $3.50 per set of 10 $3,00 per set of 10 $3.00 I:}er set of 10 $3.00 per set of 10 S0.30 S20.00 $24.00 $6.00 $11.00 $10.00 $20.00 $24.00 $295.00 $350.00 (~) Effective July 1, 1994, all returned documentation will require a return authorization humbee' oOtained in advance from the OCLC Documentation DepL Items returned without an autho,'ization number will be refused, and the carrier will be instructed to return them to the sende at sender's cost. b-,--4 April 2'7. [gek. 16'7 Apri 1 22, 1~9~ TO: FROM: OCLC Members Sohdra Kowaluk SUBJECT:OCLC Pacific/Independent Discount Program - Change Announcement Attached is a description of the Discount Program for July 1, 1994 to December 31, 1994 and the procedures which will be used to apply the discount percentages indicated in Appendix 2. The volatility of interest rates over the recent past requires.that OCLC maintain its current policy of adjusting discount program rates every six months. However, if warranted by further increases in interest rate volatility, the adjustment cycle may be further shortened to quarterly. Notification of these changes will be made in accordance with contract terms. Participants will be issued a monthly subscription credit {discount} to the account based on the average daily balance of the account over a one month period. The following annual percentage rates pertaining to the program will be in effect for the six month period beginning July 1, 1994 and ending December 31, 1994. 1) Subscription Discount APR - 4.75~ 2) Prompt Payment APR - 3.75~ 3} Late Payment Service Charge APR - 12i All funds deposited will be used in the calculation of the average daily balance of the account. Each account will receive a credit monthly based upon the subscription credit calculation and the APR in effect at the time of the calculation. If requested, withdrawal of remaining subscription balances (or portions thereof) are subject to contractual notification requirements. Notification of annual percentage rates in effect for the period beginning january 1, 1995 will be made in accordance with the contract terms (approximately October 1994). Please direct any questions you may have concerning the program to your. account coordinator. SK/pt Attachment 168 Appendix 2 OCLC, Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Discount Program Effective for the period July 1 through December 31. 1994 Subscription Discount Percentaoe: Subscription 'Discount Percentage is 4.75~ effective july 1, 1994. Subscription Credit Prepavments: A Subscription credit equivalent to 4.75~ Annual Percentage Rate of an institution's average daily balance over a one month period will be applied to the account balance at the end of the period if the average daily balance is a credit. Standard Payment Terms: Net amounts payable 45 days from date of invoice. PrO~Dt Payment Terms: Discount of .16~ (.0016) {.16~ equivalent to 3.75~ APR*) credit for payments received on or before the last day of the month following the invoice date. Late Payment Terms: Late payment service charge of 1% {12% APR) is imposed on charges outstanding in excess of 50 days from date of invoice. Late payment service charges will be assessed at the time payment is received and will be calculated on the total number of days past due. Withdrawals: Withdrawal of remaining subscription balances {or portions thereof) are subject to contractual notification requirements. * - Annual percentage rates indicated are rounded. 169 OCLC Pacific/Independent Discount Program Description Page 2 of 3 OCLC, Online Computer Library Center, inc. OCLC Pacific/Independent Discount Program Description Effective for the period july 1, 1994 through December 3t, 1994 2 Types of Discounts Offered o Subscription Credit at 4.75~ APR Credit applied to account balance at end of each month based on that month's average daily balance. o Promot Payment Discount at 3.75~ APR Applied'to payments received by OCLC on or before the last day of the month following the invoice date. All prompt payments will receive a discount of .16~ (.0016), which is equivalent to a 3.758 annual percentage rate (rounded to the nearest .25~). All valid unpaid amounts in excess of 1 month from the invoice date will be deducted from prompt payments before calculating the discount. Products Elioible for Discount o All OCLC processes, products and services included in Appendix 1 and Reference Services products are eligible. Receipt of Subscription Funds o Subscription funds will be accepted at any time during the year. Withdrawals o Withdrawal of remaining subscription balances {or portions thereof) are subject to contractual notification requirements. OCLC Pacific/Independent Discount Program Description , Page 3 of 3 ExamDl'e of Subscription Credit Proqram: Assumptions: Monthly Invoice Amount: 55,000 - Payment of $20,000 received by OCLC on July 15, 1994. O Account Activity and Discount Calculation Account Balance 7/01/94 Beginning Balance $ 0 7/15/94 Cash Received $(20,000} {20,000) 7/31/94 Invoice 5,000 {15,000) 7/31/94 Subscription Credit1 (43) {15,043) 8/01/94 Beginning Balance (15,043) 8/31/94 Invoice 5,000 (I0,043) 8/31/94 Subscription Credit2 {59) {10,102) 9/01/94 Beginning Balance {10.102} g/30/94 Invoice 5,000 (5,102) 9/30/94 Subscription Credit3 {39) (5.141) !0/01/94 Beginning Balance {5.14!) !0/31/94 Invoice 5,000 {141) 10/31/94 Subscription Credit4 {20} {161) Subscription Credit Calculation: Month AvefaDe Daily Balance5 Credit I 7/94 $(10,806) x 30/360 x .0475 $ (43) 2 8/94 $(14,882) x 30/360 x .0475 $ (59) 3 9/94 $ (9,935) x 30/360 x 0475 S (39) 4 · 10/94 $ (4,980) x 30/360 x .0475 $ (20) Average Daily Balance calculated is the sum of each day's balance divided by the actual number of days in the month. 1'71 OfLCB50212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging APPENDIX 3 Of LC ATTACHMENTS POLICY Except with the prior written consent of OOLC, no equipment or device my be directly or indirectly attached, linked or used with the OOLC System except: Terminal devices furnished or approved in writing by OCLC expressly for use with said System (hereinafter "Terminals" ). _~Any equipment or device which Library may elect, in its sole discretion, to attach to Terminals. Notwithstanding paragraph numbered "2" abo~e, no equipment or device my be attached (i) to the teleccmmunication line connecting OCLC to the site of the said Terminal(s), or (ii) to the modern at the termination point of said teleco~munication line at the site of a Terminal, or (iii) to any interconnecting cables between modern and Terminal or between Terminals. In addition, no equipment or devices except other Terminals my be attached directly or indirectly to the nextaT-port on Terminals, or to any of the circuitry associated with such port. Attachment of any equipment or device to Terminals under paragraph numbered "2" above shall be at the sole risk and expense of Participant. O(LC does not warrant or provide any assurance that such equipment or device will function properly or as desired, or that it will not cause ham to the Terminals to which attached, unless the equipment or device is furnished or approved in writing by OCLC. 172 O(~C850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging .M~PE2QDIX 4 This agreement ("Agent"), effective as of the date on which executed by both parties hemto, by and between an ir~titution organized and existing under the laws of the State of , hereinafter referred to as "Library", and , a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of , hereinafter referred to as "Vendor". ~EREAS, Library and Vendor hove contracted with each other, prior hereto or c6ntemporaneously herewith, for the supply of good~ and/or services by Vendor to Library, and my hereafter enter into additional such contracts, in connection with which, Library hos made or will hereafter make available to Vendor copies in machine-readable form of bibliographic data, library holdings and other information derived from the online dar~h~se of such information maintained by OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Incorporated ("OCLC"), which contracts between Library and Vendor are hereinafter referred to as "Contracts": and ~EREAS, in order for Library to continue making available to Vendor said bibliographic data, library holdings and other information derived from the OCLC online database (hereinafter "OCLC-derived Records"), it is necessary that Vendor provide assurances concerning use of OCLC-derived Recorda. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises hereinafter rode and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Library and Vendor hereby agree as follows: All present, executory Contracts between Library and Vendor will be daen~d anmnded to include the terms cf this AgreehenS, and all future Contracts between then which are executed while this Agreement remains in effect will be dee~md to include such terms. Vendor will make no copies of the OC~C-derived Records nor (muse such Records to be transferred to other storage media, except as essential to carry ~ut the ~ontracts. Vendor will make no use of the O(ZC-derived Records except to carry cut the Contracts, end ackn~led~s that delivery of the O(~C-deri~d Records to Vendor does not represent a transfer of ownership thereto. Vendor agrees that it will not transfer OCLC-derived Records or c¢~iea thereof to any third party, and will 173 O(LC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging % promptly return to Library all OCEC-derived Records received in connection with each Contract, upon ccepletion thereof, and all copies of such Records. This Ageement is terrainable by Vendor at any time, with or with~t cause, by thirty (30) days prior ~ritten notices sent by prepaid registered or certified first-class mail, with return receipt requested, to: (Library) Attention: -and to O(LC Online Computer Library Center, Incorporated 6565 Frantz Rcad Dublin, Ohio 43817 Attention: Corporate Counsel Any such address my be changed by Library and by OCLC by written notice to Vendor sent by Irepaid registered or certified first-class rail, with return receipt requested, to: ( Vendor ) Attention: All notices given in accordance with this Section 5 shall be ~d givmn m the date of proper deposit in the U.S. It is agreed T~at (XLC sha/1 be de~-~_d a T3~trd party beneficiary of this Agreerant entitled to seek enformmnt of [he same a~ainet Vendor in its own r~m~, no~withstanding lack of privity or ~mtrect. Vendor's obligatims under Tl~ts AcJre~nt, as they affect any Contract which has become effective prior to the terminaticn hereof, shall survive any such ~ermination. This Agreement is the final, cmplete and exclusive statement of the agreenmnt between Library and Vendor with respect to the subject totter hereof, and my not be 174 O~LC850212:01 NFP CLSA: Shared Cataloging terminated (other than as provided in Sectio~ 5 abo~e), modified, amended, rescinded or cancelled except by a writing signed by both par~ies hereto and, as a condition precedent to the effectiveness thereof, wiT31 a copy thereof furnished by Library to Of LC by the san~ means and at the santo address as provided in Sectira 5 above. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement or of any right hereunder shall he deemed a waiver of any other provision hereof or any other right hereunder. IN WI=NESS ~ER~3F, ~he parties have executed this Agreement as of the date indicated below. ( Library ) Date: Title: (Vendor) Date: Ti ~e: 175 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager FROM: Linda D. Daniels, Redevelopment Manager APPROVAL OF AMENDMF-NT NO. 7 TO LEASE BEIWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND VA! ,I ,F,y BASEBA! ,L CLUB, INC. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Amendment No. 7 to lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc. pertaining to the terms and conditions for the expansion/special events parking lot. BACKGROUND: In September 1992, the City entered into a Lease with Valley Baseball Club, Inc. to be a Tenant at the stadium facility located on the west side of Rochester and south of Foothill Boulevard. During the first season, the need for additional parking facilities was recognized due to the Tenant's expansion of seating capacity at the stadium. The Tenant has agreed to cooperate with the City in providing a permanent parking facility. In October 1993, Amendment No. 4 to the lease between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Valley Baseball Club, Inc. was approved. The amendment outlined a financial participation for the City and the Tenant in the acquisition, design and construction of the expansion/special events parking lot. The City and the Tenant identified a site for an expansion parking lot and the City began design work and construction of the expansion/special events lot. The terms were the Agency/City would acquire and develop the parking lot. The Tenant would pay through "improvement rent", over a twenty year period of time, for the on-site costs of the expansion/parking lot, not to exceed $1.5 million. ANALYSIS: The City and the Tenant have agreed to modify the terms and conditions of payment for the expansion/special events parking lot. The revised terms require the Tenant, beginning in October 1994, to pay a September 7, 1994 Staff Report - Amendment No. 7 page 2 $15,000 per month "improvement rent" for the remaining term of the lease. In addition, the Tenant will contribute 30% of the ticket price and concession revenues for the remaining years of the lease, excluding beer and wine, from. a pre season "freeway series" game with another California League team and a regular league game (16 games total). The revenue from these two games will be in addition to revenue currently being received from the present lease terms. The Tenant has provided a cumulative guarantee of $20,000 annually from the two games. The terms of the revised proposal provide the City with a net present value consistent with what was achieved with the prior amendment. One advantage to the City is the financial participation by the Tenant is complete at the term of the lease and the balloon payment is eliminated. Respectfully submitted, Linda D. Daniels Redevelopment Manager 177 kMENDMENT NO. ? TO LEASE This Amendment No. 7 is entered into as of , 1994, by and between the CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ("City" hereinafter) and VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC., a California Corporation ("Tenant" hereinafter). WXTNES~ETH A. Recitals · (i) City and Tenant entered into a Lease dated September 16. 1992 ("the Lease" hereinafter) regarding the use of a stadium and ancillary facilities ("the Stadium" hereinafter) described therein. (ii) The Lease has been amended six (6) times heretofore, the fourth such amendment having been concerned with the provision of additional parking facilities to serve as Tenant's baseball patrons and to provide for Tenant paying additional rent to partially defray the costs of that parking ( "the Fourth Amendment" hereinafter) . (iii) The purpose of this Amendment No. 7 is to modify the Fourth Amendment with respect to the consideration to be paid by Tenant to City to aid City in defraying the costs of providing said additional parking. B. ~me~dmgnt No, 2. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The parties hereto acknowledge that City has acquired the property described in Exhibit "A" to the Fourth 1 178 Amendment and has constructed a parking lot thereon and thus is providing the additional parking referred to in the Fourth Amendment. 2. Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Fourth Amendment hereby are rescinded and are superseded by the following provisions of this Amendment No. 7. 3. In consideration of the City providing the above referenced additional parking, and in addition to any other payments due from Tenant to City pursuant to the Lease, Tenant shall pay to City monthly Improvement Rent in the amount of $15,000.00, payable on the first day of each month during the remaining term of the Lease, commencing with the month of October, 1994. All provisions of the Lease applicable to rent payments shall apply to Tenant's obligation to pay the Improvement Rent including, but not limited to, the second and third sentences of Section 4.05 and Sections 4.08 and 35.01 of the Lease, except that Section 4.07 of the Lease shall not apply to Tenant's obligation to pay Improvement Rent. 4. In further consideration of the City providing the above referenced additional parking, and in addition to any other payments due from Tenant to City pursuant to the Lease, Tenant shall pay to City thirty percent (30%) of all revenues derived by Tenant from ticket sales, (excluding admissions taxes paid by patrons) and concession sales (other than beer and wine) derived from the following two events to occur each year during the term of the Lease (for a total of 16 events): 179 A~ A pre-season exhibition baseball game between ~he Quakes and another California League team; and S. One regular season game between.the Q~akes and another California League team to be designated by the Quakes at least sixty (~0) days prior to the designated game. City may develop a specific program for any such game with the reasonable support and assistance of Tenant. If any of the 16 games specified above in this Paragraph 4 iS not played due to rain or any other unforeseen circumstance, Tenant and City shall agree on an alternate date for the conduct of that game. Payments to be made by Tenant with respect to a game pursuant to B, above, shall be due within thirty (30) days following the conclusion of that game. Should the total of such payments for any calendar year be less than Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00), Tenant's second payment for that year shall be increased so that the total of the two payments f6r that year shall be the sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00). All provisions of the Lease applicable to rent payments shall apply to Tenant's obligation to made payments pursuant to B above, including, but not limited to, the second and third sentences of Section 4.05 and Sections 4.06, 4.08 and'35.01 of the Lease, except that Section 4.07 of the Lease shall not apply to such payments. 5. The payments specified in paragraphs 3 and 4 of this Amendment No. 7 shall not in any way affect th& computation 3 180 of additional rent pursuant to Section 4.03 of the Lease. Further, parking revenues derived from games specified in subparagraph 4B above, shall be distributed in accordance with Amendment No. I to the Lease. 6. Other than as amended hereby, the Lease as previously amended by Amendments I through 6, inclusive, and each and every term and provision thereof shall remain in full force and effect. WHEREFORE, City and Tenant have entered into this Amendment No. 7 as of the date set forth hereinabove. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTESTz By: Dennis L. stout, Mayor'' By: bebra J. Adams, City Clerk VALLEY BASEBALL CLUB, INC. By: Henry 'E. Stickhey, Presia~' C%13Q~AMZIII)~%ItC 18.2. Q1 4 181 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAy BETWEEN CHURCH OF GOD OF PROPHECY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROjECT) REC()II~NDATION It is reconmnended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Church of God of Prophecy of Ontario, California and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACXGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Church of God of Prophecy of Ontario, California has agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to their property. In this regard, Church of God of Prophecy of Ontario, California has executed an agreement with the City for installation of improvements and dedication of the right-of-way. City Engi neer WjO:HM:sd Attachment L Y 182 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAy DEOIC.~TION FROM CHURCH OF GO0 OF PROPHECY OF ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA ANO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ANO CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHERE/kS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Church of God of Prophecy parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Church of God of Prophecy of Ontario, California has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, Californta. 183 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City'Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshl, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN WESTERN LATIN AMERICAN DISTRICT, CHURCH OF THE NAZARINE AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) L NECOM(NOATION It is reconm~ended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Western Latin American District, Church of the Nazartne and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/AJLMLYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Western Latin American District, Church of the Nazartne has agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to their property. In this regard, Western Latin American District, Church of the Nazarine has executed an agreement with the City for install ation of improvements and dedication of the right-of-way. Respectfully su tted, Will tam J. O'Nut~~/~~ City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachment RESOLUTION NO. ~6/-/?C) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM WESTERN LATIN ANERICAN DISTRICT, CHURCH OF THE NAZARINE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLER)< TO SIGN THE SANE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Western Latin American District, Church of the Nazarine parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Western Latin American District, Church of the Nazarlne has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California, 185 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshl, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN JUANA M. SANCHEZ AND GUILLERMO CABRERA AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) RECOPI!~MDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Juana M. Sanchez and Guill ermo Cabrera and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACXGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Juana M. Sanchez and Guill ermo Cabrera have agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk t~rovements adjacent to their property. In this regard, Juana M. Sanchez and Guillermo Cabrera have executed an agreement with the City for install ation of improvements and dedication of the right-of-way. Respectful ly s~~ ~ Will Jam J. O'Ne City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachment L 186 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM JUANA M. SANCHEZ AND GUILLERMO CABRERA AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Sanchez and Cabrera parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Juana M. Sanchez and Guill ermo Cabrera have agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and CIty Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, C~ lfornla. 187 f DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and r4embers of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshi, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN CALISTIO GONEZ AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) RECO;leENDATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approvtng the Agreement for Instal 1 ation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Calistio Gomez and the City of Rencho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Calistto Gomez has agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to his property. In this regard, Caltstio Gomez has executed an agreement with the City for installation of improvements and dedication of the right-of-way. Respectfull ~(~K~~ y bmi tted, · Will jam J. 0 City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachment L 188 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM CALISTIO GOMEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE S/UqE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Gomez parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Cal istio Gomez has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Hayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, Cal ifornia. 189 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Murakoshl, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN MARIA A. HERNANDEZ AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDNIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) ItlECOIiqlENOATION It is recommended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Instal 1 art on of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Maria A. Hernandez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACICGROUN!)/ANALYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Haria A. Hernandez has agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to her property. In this regard, Maria A. Hernandez has executed an agreement with the City for lnstal 1 ation of improvements and dedication of the ri ght-of-way. Respectfully ,s~.Z~ will Jam J. O'N~il City Engineer WJO:HM:sd Attachment L A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAHONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM MARIA A. HERNANDEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLE~ TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Hernandez parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Maria A. Hernandez has agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF P-ANCHO CUCAHONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and directs the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardtno County, California. 191 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Henry Marakoshl, Associate Engineer APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATION OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN FRANCISCO MARTINEX AND EVANGELINA MARTINEZ AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NINTH STREET BETWEEN GROVE AVENUE AND EDWIN STREET (BUDGETED CDBG PROJECT) IECOIIEMDATIOII It is reconmnended that City Council adopt the attached Resolution approving the Agreement for Installation of Street Improvements and Right-of-Way Dedication between Francisco Martinez and Evangel ina Martinez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS City Council has approved a CDBG project for the reconstruction of Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street. This project will provide for new street improvements along Ninth Street, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, street paving and other related work. In order to allow for the street construction and installation of the sidewalk improvements, it is necessary to obtain a roadway easement from several property owners on the street. Francisco Martinez and Evangel ina Marttnez have agreed to grant the City a road easement to allow for the street construction and installation of sidewalk improvements adjacent to their property. In this regard, Francisco Martinez and Evangel tna Martinez have executed an agreement with the City for installation of improvements and dedication of the right-of-way. Respectfully submitted, , Will tam J. O'ei~l City Engineer W~O:HM:sd Attachment L 192 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING AN AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION FROM FRANCISCO MARTINEZ AND EVANGELINA MARTINEZ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN THE SAME WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established requirements for construction of road improvements in conjunction with the Ninth Street from Grove Avenue to Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, the installation of curb, gutter, sidewalk, street paving and other related work, located along the portion of the Marttnez parcel, shall be made a part of the Ninth Street between Grove Avenue and Edwin Street Project; and WHEREAS, Francisco Martinez and Evangel ina Martlnez have agreed to dedicate a Road Easement to the City for said Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, California does accept said Improvement Agreement, and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign same, and dtrects the City Clerk to record same in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardtrio County, Cal lfornia. 193 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam~ AICP, City Manager Will Jam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Will ie Valbuena, Assistant Engineer APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR C.U.P. 93-49, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, BETWEEN SPRUCE AND ELM AVENUES, SUBMITTED BY LEWIS HOMES OF CALIFORNIA REC(XiI[MDATION It is reconmnended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving C.U.P. 93-49, accepting the subject agreements and securities, and authorizing the Hayor and the City D erk to sign said agreements. ANALYSIS/BACKGROUND C.U.P. 93-49, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues, in the Community Commercial District of the Tetra Vista Community plan, was approved by the Planning Commission on July 27, 1994. This project is for the development of an integrated shopping center consisting of 15 buildings totaling 222,605 square feet on 25 acres of land. The Developer, Lewis Homes of California, is submitting agreements (a separate one for each street) and securities to guarantee the construction of the off-site improvements in the loll owing amounts: Spruce Avenue Elm Avenue Foolhill Boulevard Church Street Faithful Performance Bond Labor and Hatertal Bond $108,600.00 144,200.00 401,000.00 34,200.00 $ 54,300.00 72,100.00 200,500.00 17,100.00 Copies of the agreements and securities are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectful 1 y submitted, · Will Jam J. O'Ne CIty Engineer WjO:WV:dlw Attachments RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENTS AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 93-49 - WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration Improvement Agreements executed on September 7, 1994, by Lewis Homes of California as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Spruce and Elm Avenues; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreements and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said real property as referred to as C.U.P. 93-49; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreements are secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Securities, which are identified in said Improvement Agreements· NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: That said Improvement Agreements be and the same are approved and the ~yor is authorized to execute same on behalf of said City and the City Clerk is authorized to attest thereto; and That said Improvement Securities are accepted as good and sufficient, subject to approval as to form and content thereof by the City Attorney. 195 ii1111111 Im . CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENG~nqG DIVISION 196 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor, and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer ! ~ . Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector ~~ APPROVAL OF IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION FOR TRACT 13565-1 THRU -4 LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SUI~IT AVENUE AND WARDMAN BULLOCK ROAD, SUBMITTED BY STANDARD PACIFIC RECOII~ENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution, accepting the subject agreement extension and security and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to sign said agreement. BACKI~ROUIID/ANALYSIS Improvement Agreement and Improvement Security to guarantee the construction of the public improvements for Tract 13565-1 thru -4 were approved by the City Council on July 18, 1991, in the following amounts: Faithful Performance Bond: $4,097,000 Labor and Material Bond: $2,048,500 The developer, Standard Pacific, is requesting approval of a 12-month extension on said improvement agreement in order to complete the remaining improvements. Copies of the Improvement Agreement Extension are available in the City Clerk's Office. Respectful ly submttted, William j. O' City Engineer WJO:SMG:ly Attachments STANDARD PACIFIC OF ORANGE COUNTY July 20, 1'994 Mr. Steve M. Gilliland Public Works Inspector THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 RE: Improvement Agreement for Tract 13565-1thru 4 Dear Steve: Standard Pacific hereby requests an extension on the Improvement Agreement for Tract 13565-1 thru 4. Enclosed you will find three (3) copies of the Improvement Agreement and a check in the mount of $251.00 To date, approximately ninety-five percent (95%) of the work referred to in this agreement is complete. The only remaining work to be completed is the LMD landscaping along Wardman Bullock Road and this work is already under way. Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (714) 668-4383. Sincerely, STANDARD PACIFIC OF ORANGE COUNTY, a division of Standard Pacific Corp. Crystal Burclde Assistant Project Manager /cb 1565 West MacArthur Boulevard Costa Mesa, California o2626, 7141668-4300 198 4'/7(e A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION AND IMPROVEMENT SECURITY FOR TRACT 13565-1THRU 13565-4 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has for its consideration an Improvement Agreement Extension executed on September 7, 1994, by Standard Pacific as developer, for the improvement of public right-of-way adjacent to the real property specifically described therein, and generally located on the southeast corner of Summit Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road; and WHEREAS, the installation of such improvements, described in said Improvement Agreement and subject to the terms thereof, is to be done in conjunction with the development of said Tract 13565-1 thru 13565-4; and WHEREAS, said Improvement Agreement Extension is secured and accompanied by good and sufficient Improvement Security, which is identified in said Improvement Agreement Extension. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamenga, California hereby resolves, that said Improvement Agreement Extension and said Improvement Security be and the same are hereby approved and the Mayor is hereby authorized to sign said Improvement Agreement Extension on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamenga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. 199 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland Public Works I '~ , nspector/I-t ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TRACT 12671-1 THRU 12671-4 LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER-OF MILLIKEN AVENUE AND MTN. VIEW DRIVE RECOI'I'EBI)ATION: The required street improvements for Tract 12671-1 thru 12671-4 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is reconmended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $103,400.00. BACKGROUND/ANN. YSI S Tract 12671-1 thru 12671-4 - located on the northwest corner of Milliken Avenue and Htn. View Drive DEVELOPER: Lewis Homes P.O. Box 670 Upland, CA 91785 Rel ease: Faithful Performance Bond (Street) Respectfully tglttite~ William J. O' City Engineer WJO:SMG:ly Attachment $103,400.00 soLu'r o, ,o./ 7 '7' A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA~ CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR TRACT 12671-1THRU 12671-4 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR TIlE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Tract 12671-1 thru 12671-4 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. DATE: · TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William j. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gllliland, Public Works Inspector ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR PARCEL MAP 10185 LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF HIGHLAND AVENUE AND MILLIKEN AVENUE RECO~!IOATION: The required street improvements for Parcel Map 10185 have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is reco~nended that City Council accept said improvements, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $606,000. !)ACKI;ROUN!)/ANALYSIS Parcel Map 10185 - located on the southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Milliken Avenue Release: DEVELOPER: The William Lyon Co. 4490 Von Karman Newport Beach, CA 92658 Faithful Performance Bond (Street) Respectfully sub tted, - William J. O'Nei~ City Engineer WJO:SMG:ly Attachment $606,000 L 202 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAIqONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR PARCEL HAP 10185 AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for Parcel Map 10185 have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council qack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Steve M. Gilliland, Public Works Inspector~ ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS, RELEASE OF BONDS AND NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE CHURCH STREET MEDIANS (TRACT 13717) LOCATED ON CHURCH STREET BETWEEN SPRUCE AVENUE AND ELM AVENUE EAST REC(MIEMDATIOM: The required improvements for the Church Street Medians (Tract 13717) have been completed in an acceptable manner, and it is reconmnended that City Council accept said improvements, accept the Maintenance Guarantee Bond in the amount of $6,400.00, authorize the City Engineer to file a Notice of Completion and authorize the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $64,000.00. BACKGiiOUND/ANALYSIS Church Street Medians - located Church Street between Spuce Avenue and Elm Avenue East. L DEVELOPER: Lewis Development Co. 1156 N. Mountain Avenue Upland, CA 91785 Accept: Maintenance Guarantee Bond Rel ease: Faithful Performance Bond Respectful ly submitted, William d. O'Neil City Engineer $6,400.00 $64,000.00 WJO:SMG:ly Attachment A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CHURCH STREET MEDIANS AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Church Street Medians have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work compl ere. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. 2O5 DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer Michael D. Long, Supervising Public Works Inspector ACCEPT THE ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 94-026, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION". RECOI,!qENDATION It is recomnended that City Council accept the Etiwanda Conmnunity Trail Drainage Improvements, Contract No. 94-026, as complete, authorize the City to file a "Notice of Completion", retain the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $144,174.00 to be used as the Maintenance Bond, and authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $7,736.25 and the Labor and Materials Bond in the amount of $144,174.00, thirty (30) days after the recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. A1 so, approve the final contract amount of $154,725.09. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation is $154,725.09 which includes 2 contract change orders for locating utilities, construction of additional drainage structures and construction of a "V" gutter. Respectfully s ed, William J. O'N~ City Engineer WjO:MDL:ly L Y RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE ETIWANDA COMMUNITY TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS, CONTRACT NO. 94-- 026, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WORK WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Etiwanda Community Trail Drainage Improvements, Contract No. 94-026, have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work as complete. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino. 207 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Will lam J. O'Neil, City Engineer Linda R. Beek, Jr. Engineer ACCEPT THE HELLNAN AVENUE AND NINTH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, CONTRACT NO. C.O. 94-029, AS COMPLETE, RELEASE THE BONDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY ENGINEER TO FILE A "NOTICE OF COMPLETION" AND APPROVE THE FINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $63,828.90 R!~CON~ENDATIOII: It is recommended that the City Council accept the Hellman Avenue and Ninth Street Improvement Project, Contract No. C.O. 94-029, as complete, authorize the City Engineer to file a "Notice of Con~letion", and retain the Faithful Performance Bond in the amount of $37,906.00 to be used as the Maintenance Bond and authorize the release of the Labor and Material s Bond in the amount of $18,953.00 six months after recordation of said notice if no claims have been received. A1 so, authorize the release of the retention in the amount of $6,382.90, 35 days after approval of the final contract amount of $63,828.90. BACKGROUND/AKALYSIS The subject project has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The final contract amount, based on project documentation, is $63,828.90, which includes two minor change orders in the amount of $22,132.30 for unforeseen grading and paving. The original amount approved by Council was .$41,696.60, and the revised amount approved by Council is $63,828.90. Respectful 1 y submttted, Will Jam J. O'Ne~ City Engineer WJO:LRB:sd Attachment Y "'??tl ' t ............. l' ..... RESOLUTION NO. (~2G/-/~/ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR HELLMAN AVENUE AND NINTH STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AND A~THORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE WOR)< WHEREAS, the construction of public improvements for the Hellman Avenue and Ninth Street Improvement Project has been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion is required to be filed, certifying the work complete. NCN, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby resolves, that the work is hereby accepted and the City Engineer is authorized to sign and file a Notice of Completion with the County Recorder of San Bernardino County. DATE: TO: FROM: BY SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and ~tembers of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager William J. O'Neil, City Engineer f4aria Perez, Assistant Engineer CONSIOERATION OF AN APPEAL FOR CONDITIONAL USE PEI~IIT 94-4)8 - SNICNF/ - An appeal of the ~anning Commission's conditions of approval to perform a subdivision of the parcels in question as related to the establishment of a nightclub in the Community Commercial District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Hermosa Avenue - APN 1077-601-07 REC()I4eE NDAT I ON It is recommended that the City Council, with concurrence of the applicant, take no action regarding the appeal request. Council should direct staff to have the appltcation reconsidered by the P1 anning Coenl sslon. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Conditional Use Permit was approved by the Planning Commission on June 8, 1994, by the adoption of Resolution Number 94-42 (see attached minutes). The applicant submitted a request for a modification to condition number 1, the requirement to subdivide, as indicated in the attached letter. Engineering Division special condition number I reads: "A subdivision map (parcel map) shall be performed as required by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permit." The Subdivision f4ap Act does provide for lot line adjustments. However, staff originally denied the request and conditioned the requirement of a parcel map due to lack of record information substantiating the existence of the lots as indicated in the assessor's parcel map. With the submittal of the appeal, staff pursued further discussion with the applicant. These discussions resulted in uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the assessor's map as it relates to the lots configuration. L 210 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 94-08 - SANCHEZ September 7, 1994 Page 2 Staff sent a letter (copy attached) requesting the applicant clarify his request for a lot line adjustment. The property owner submitted a copy of a preliminary title report but gave no further explanation. The title report indicates there are two lots as shown on Exhibit "C" contrary to the assessor's map which show four lots as shown on Exhibit "B". The CUP 94-08 was processed based upon the four 1 ot configuration. With the discovery that the ti~ e report indicates there are actually only two 1 ots, staff has sought advice from the City Attorney regarding the application for the CUP. With concurrence from the applicant, staff will bring the original application before the Planning Commission to be reconsidered. The issue regarding the parcel map requirement as well as other standard conditions will be reviewed at that time. Also, after advertising this appeal, staff received two letters voicing concern of the project (copies attached). These concerns will be addressed with any further review by the P1 anning Conmni ssion. With concurrence from the applicant, there is no action necessary regarding the appeal request. It is recommended City Council, by minute action, direct staff to further review the original application and to take appropriate action. However, if the applicant insists upon action by the City Council, the City Attorney has advised staff appropriate action is to deny the CUP based upon an incorrect application. If the application is denied, staff will prepare a resolution of denial for the next City Council meeting. Respectfully submitted, ' - William J. ll~ City Engineer WjO:MP:dlw Attachments: Applicants letter of request Letters Voicing Concern of Project Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Four Parcel Configuration Exhibit "C" - Two Parcel Configuration July 13, 1994 Letter to Applicant Resolution 94-42 Planning Commission Minutes of June 8, 1994 211 /~EC~IVED June 20, 1994 Ms Jan Sutton City Clerk ~ O ~,c~ City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91729 Reference: Resolution No. 94-42 Dear Ms. Sutton, JUN 2 0 1994 I am writing to the City Council to request an appeal concerning the Engineering Departments condition No. 1 for Conditional Use Permit No. 94-08 that was approved by the Planning Commission by Resolution No. 94-42 on June 8, 1994. Condition No. 1 requires a Parcel Map be prepared prior to issuance of building permits. I am requesting that this condition be satisfied by a lot line adjustment. As you know the Subdivision Map Act provides for a lot line adjustment between two or more existing adjacent parcels and no additional lots are created. There will be no change to the existing buildings. By doing the lot line adjustment all of the parking required by the project will be on the same parcel. Enclosed is my check in the amount of One Hundred Twenty Six Dollars ($126.00) as the fee for this appeal. Thank you, John Sanchez ' 'rl"TI" T 212, RE~CEIVF_,D AUG 3 0 ;994 crry oi: RANPc, HO CIJCAM ONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION 213 CITY OF RANCHO CUC;.'.!, '''"~ ENGtNF..ERING DIV~S!ON 214 CITY OF ~ANCHO CUCAMONGA ENGINEERING DIVISION ?m, tCuF_o24-o4 N 215 MOLE/- x/A CA~'F ?R O l:::'Oc~F_..l~ N IG~T c LuB "'~"'-S. t/4 COR. SEC. 2 *T. IS.,R. 7W. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENG~rNG DIVISION t'OOTI IILL ~ Pnu~ ueyT' e:XH:Hl~, ~ N 216 T. ~S.,R.?W. CITY OF I, ANCHO CUCAMONGA ENG~ING DIVISION i'OOTI IILL. N 217 T H C C ! T Y C. P July 13, 1994 John Sanchez 604 North Poland West Covina, CA 91790 SUBJECT: CUP 94-08 APPEAL TO ENGINEERING DIVISION CONDITION NUMBER 1 Dear Mr. Sanchez: In 1 ight of the conflicting information regarding the your sight, it is necessary that your appeal be more earl lest convenience, you could clarify the following: a) il eta The request is to appeal the condition re uirin a parcel map and allow a lot 1 ine adjustment between APN 1077-601-~ and %7 f ( assuming our separate parcel s per Assessor' s Parcel Map ). The request is to ap eal the condition requiring a parcel ma and all b) lot 1 ine adjustment ~etween a parcel including the hotel, t~e mi ow a nimarket and the nightclub and the vacant parcel to the north (assuming 2 separate parcel s ). Situation "b" will require verification in the form of a preliminary Title Report to prove there are in fact only two 1 egal lots. We would 1 lke to schedule you for the soonest possible City Council meettnq. This item requires a public hearing with a ublic notice printed 10 days prior. In order to schedule for an August 1~, 1994 City Council meeting a response must be at the City no later than July 2B, 1994. Assistant Engineer or myself at g extension 2313 or extension 2362, respectively. Cordial ly yours, COI~UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Senior Civil Engineer Dj:dlw cc: Scott Murphy, Associate P1 anner Mayor Dennis L. Stout Mayor Pro-Tern Charles J. Buauet II Jack Lain. AICP, City Manager Councilmember William J. Alexanaer Councmlmember Diane Williotas Councilmember Rex Gutierrez 10500 Civic Center Drive Box 807 · rlancno Cucornonga. CA 91729 · (909) 989-1851 · FAX (909) 9872'~8 RESOLUTION NO. 94-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCMO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94-08, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A NIGHT CLUB AND SPORTS BAR, INCLUDING ENTERTAINMENT, AMUSEMENT DEVICES (VIDEO/ARCADE GAMES), AND THE ON-SITE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC' BEVERAGES, WITHIN AN EXISTING BUILDING IN THE COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DESIGNATION (SUBAREA 3) OF THE FOOTMILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT 10134 FOOTM/LL BOULEVARD, EAST OF HERMOSA AVENUE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEP. EOF - APN: 1077-601-07 AND 08. A. Recitals. 1. John Sanchez has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Pemit No. 94-08 as described in the title of this Resolution. Mereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 8th day of June 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2- Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on June 8, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, approximately 170 feet from the Hermosa Avenue intersection, with a street frontage of 132 feet and lot depth of 387 feet and is presently developed with a commercial building, formerly used as · night club; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is designated for commercial uses and is vacant. The property to the south of the site is designated for commercial uses and is developed with · restaurant. The property to the east is designated for commercial uses and il developed with a house converted to an office. The property to the west is designated for commercial uses and is developed with a motel and convenience market; and c. Night clubs serving alcoholic beverages and/or providing entertainment are allowed in the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan subject to review and approval of a conditional use permit application; and 219 PLANNING COMMiSSiON RESOLUTION NO. 94-42 CUP 94-08 - JOHN SANCHEZ June 8, 1994 Page 2 d. The subject property is within a designated Activity Center pursuant to the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and e. The development of the night club and sports bar is consistent with the Community Commercial designation of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan &rid the Commercial designation of the General Plan; and f. The application proposes to upgrade the site to include providing additional parking and landscaping consistent with the requirements of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Development Code; and g. The application, with the attached conditions of approval, will comply with all applicable standards of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan and the Development Code, 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; and b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to.properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, it has been determined that the proposed project does not have the potential for causing significant effects on the environment. The project has been determined to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). The Planning Commission, having final approval -over this project, has reviewed and considered this exemption, including the comments received during the public review process, prior to the approval of this project. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Plsnnin~ Division 1) Roof screening shall be provided on aLl'sides to screen views of the existing and new roof- mounted equipment. The final design of the screen shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits or commencement of use, whichever comes first. 22O PLANNING CO~M!jSi©N RESGLUTZON 2~0. 94-42 CUP 94-08 - JOHN SANCHEZ June 8, 1994 Page 3 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) A decorative metal fence within a landscape planter shall be provided between the parking area for the night club and the motel/convenience market. The planter shall be a minimum of 5 feet in width and may be located on the adjoining property. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to the issuance of building permits or commencement of use, whichever comes first. Landscaping and hardscape shall be installed across the Foothill Boulevard frontage within the 25-foot building setback area, as measured from the ultimate curb, consistent with the requirements of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan activity center. The developer may defer the portion within the public right-of-way subject to contribution towards future construction and shall be provided prior to building permit issuance. Accent paving shall be provided at the project entry outside of the public right-of-way. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance or commencement of use, whichever comes first. The building shall be repainted. The final color shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner prior to building permit issuance or commencement of use, whichever comes first. Security personnel shall be provided within the parking area at all times during the evening and night hours. The building shall comply with all requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire District prior to building permit issuance and compliance with all requirements shall be obtained prior to commencement of use of the building and site. The building shall compZy with all requirements of the Uniform Building Code. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official prior to building permit issuance and compliance with all requirements shall be obtained prior to commencement of use of the building and site. PLANNING COmmiSSiON RESCLUTiCt; :;.S. 94-42 CUP 94-08 - JOHN SANCHEZ June 8, 1994 Page 4 9) Approval is granted for a night club, sports, bar, amusement devices (video/arcade games), and entertainment as identified in Entertainment Permit 94-01. No adult entertainment is permitted. 103 If the operation of the business creates law enforcement and/or fire safety problems, such as but not limited to, loitering and disturbances, noise, overcrowding, blocked fire exits, etc., this Entertainment Permit shall be brought before the Planning Commission for consideration of modification and/or revocation. 11) All existing signs shall be removed or modified, subject to City Planner review and approval of a Sign Permit, to conform to the City's Sign Ordinance. 12) The site plan shall be revised to construct the 5-foot landscape planter located at the north end of the site, west of the new parking area, completely within the subject property. 13) Concrete bumper stops shall be provided in the three parking spaces located at the northeast and northwest co=nets of the building to prevent cars from hitting cars parked in the adjoining spaces. 14) The hours of operation shall be limited to 11 a.m. to 12 midnight, Sunday through Wednesday, and 11 a.m. to 2 a.m. Thursday through Saturday. 15) A cow of this Resolution shall be attached to any lease for =his space. 16) This approval shall become null and void if a Certificate of Occupancy is not issued within 18 months from the date of approval, unless an extension has been grated by the Planning Commission. This Conditional Use Permit shall be monitored and brought back to the Planning Commission within six months from occupancy to review compliance with all Condition~ of Approval and applicable City ordinances. Failure to comply with the Conditions of Approval or applicable City ordinances shall cause the suspension of the Conditional Use Permit and possible revocation of the Conditional Use Permit by ~he Planning Commission. PLANNING COM/~_oS~Z~ AESOLUiiG:~ :~. =~-4~ CUP 94-08 - JOHN SANCHEf June 8, 1994 Page 5 17) A decorative metal fence shall be installed around the perimeter of the site. Enqineerinu Division 4) 1) 2) 3) A subdivision map (parcel map) shall be performed as required by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. Contribution towards the construction of full frontage improvements on Foothill Boulevard for Parcel No. 1077-601-07 shall be provided prior to building permit issuance. Install the median, including landscaping and irrigation, on Foothill Boulevard. a) The minimum limits of the median shall be determined by Caltrans and the City Engineer. The existing pavement shall be widened as necessary to accommodate the median, four travel lanes, and sufficient shoulder within the existing right-of-way. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement as redevelopment/developeent occurs to the full amount, less the value of his frontage. b) If aXl other conditions of approval have been met to occupy the structure and CalTrans has not determined if the median will be allowed, the applicant may post a cash deposit or other security acceptable to the City Engineer to cover the cost of the median installation. The deposit mount shall be established by the City Engineer and shall be paid prior to occupancy of the structure. c) If Caltrans does not allow installation of the median, contribution towards one-half the cost of construction of the Foothill Boulevard median, including landscaping and irrigation per lineal foot of frontage, shaXl be provided prior to building permit issuance. Contribution toward the cost per linear foot of undergrounding, as defined by ordinance, for the lines on the project side of the street shall be provided. PLkNNiNG CO~:SS:~N PESCLTTiZ:; ::l. >4-~1 CUP 94-08 - jOHN SANCHEZ June 8, 1994 Page 6 5) An ingress/egress easement shall De provided for all adjacent properties. 6) Connection to the private drainage system to the back of the Oasin on Hermosa Avenue requires structural analysis. Substantiate both the structural integrity of the existing basin with the proposed connection and the structural integrity of the method of connection to the basin. 7) The vehicle stacking distance from Foothill Boulevard shall be 75 feet from the ultimate facb of curb. The final plans shall reflect this requirement and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. 6, The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JUNE 1994. PLANN CO~I~SION OFT~.'E CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY E D / 8arker, ATTEST I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of June 1994, by the following vote-to-wit= AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS= TOLSTOY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: Those items checked are Conditions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Time LImits 1. Approval shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, if building permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 24 months from the date of approval. 2. Development'Design Review shall be approveel prior to / / 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of / / / / SC-12/93 The developer shall commence, participate in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, participated in, or consummated, a Melio-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District to finance construction and/or maintenance of a fire station to serve the development. The station shall be located, designed, and txjilt to all specifications of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districfs properly upon completion. The equipment shall be selected by the District in accordance with its needs, In any building of a station, the developer shall cornply with all applicable laws and regulations. The CFD shall be formed by the District and the developer l~y the time recordation ol the final map occurs. Prior to recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permitS, whichever comes first, the applicant Shall consent to, or participate in, the establishment of a Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districl for the construction and maintenance of necessary SChool facilities. However, if any SChOOl district has previously established Such i'Comrnunity Facilities District, the applicant shall, in the aRemath/e, consent te the annexation of the project site into the territory of such existing District prior to the recordation of the final map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Further, it the affected SChool district has not formed a Melio-ROOs Community Facilities District within tweh/e months from The dale of approval of the proled and prior to the recordatK)n of the final map Or issuance of I:)uilding perrnits for said Proled, this condition Shall be deemed null and void. loll2 This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all affected school districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. , Prior to recordalton of the final maID or prior tO issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities are or w~ll be available to serve the proposed project shall be sul~mitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued Dy the water district within 90 d aye prior to final maID al~roval in the case of subdivision or prior to issuance of permits in t~e case of all other residential IDrojects. / / B. SIte Development 1. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the a,ogroved plans which include site plans. architectural elevations. exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign Development Code regulations, and I Specific Plan and Planned Community. ,x' X 2. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Occupancy of the facility sham not commence until such time as all Uniform Building Code and State Fire Marshairs regulations have been complied wilh. Prior tO occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamenga Fire Protection Distdct and the Building and Safety Division to show compliance. The building shall be inspected for compliance prior tO occupancy. 4. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Al:q:H'Oval shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building parrnits. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency pnor to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.), or prior to final maID approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced. whichever COmes firSt. Al:q:H'oval ol this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other apf)licable City Ordinances, and al~lica~ie Community Plans or SpacHic Plans i'n effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. A detailed on-site lighting plan Shall be reviewed and approved by the City Planner and Sheriff's Department (989.-6611 ) prior to the issuance of txjilding permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not tO adverSely affect adjacent propertieS. / / / / / / SC-t2/93 g, 10. If no centralized trash receptacles are I:H'ovided, all trash pick-up Shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. TraSh receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final de~,3n, locations, and the numt)er of trash receptacles Shall be subject to City Planner review and al:q:H'oval prior to issuance of building permits. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformerS, AC condenserS, etc., shall be ioc.,8ted out of put:)lic view and adeduately screened through the use of a coml)ination o! concrete or mesonn/walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction ol the Cily Planner. 2 or 12 11. Street names snail 13e submitted for City Planner review an<:j approval in accorclance with the adopted Street Naming Policy pnor to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of ~treet improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices. in conjunction with street improvements. 14. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animais without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 15. The Covenants, Conditions. and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorlx}ration of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits. whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer· 16. All parkways. open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by lhe property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptaisle to the City. Proof ot this landscape maintenance shall be sul:}mitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance ot building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions Ior the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation ol the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements Shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation. structures, fixtures or any other object, except lor utility wires and similar objects. pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project contains a designated Historical Landmark. The site Shall be developed and majntained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit No. · Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior ol the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, reiocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval. C. Building Design An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swimming pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. ,adl Swimming pOolS i~stalled at the time of initial development shall be supplemented with solar heating. Details shall be included in the building plans and shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. All dwellings Shall have the front, side and rear elevations ul:xjraded with architectural treatment. detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permitS. SO-i2/93 3of 12 / / /__ / /__ / / I I / / / / / / / Parking X 3. Standard patio cover plans for use by the Homeowners' Association sDall De sut:)mitted for City Planner and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of I:)uildin(:J permits. 4. All roof appurtenances, including air conditionMrs and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architec'lurally integrated with the building design and constnjcteq to the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building plans. SrKI VehiCular *~ccess (Indicate details on building plans) All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shall contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including curb). 2.. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/ plazas/recreational uses. y 3. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. / / 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in ---/ .... / depth from back of sidewalk. 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles / / on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor parking area. 6. 'Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and / / Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection DistriCt review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Landlcaplng (for publicly maimalned landlcape areas, refer to Section N,) 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscap- ing in the case of residential development, sham be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted fo r City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot sulxlivision. Existin~J trees required to be preserved in place shall be protected with a construction barrier in accordance with the Municipal Code Section 19.08.110, and so noted on the grading plans. The location of those trees to be preserved in place and new locations for transplanted trees shall be shown on the detailed landscape pins. The applicant shall follow all of the ar*oorisrs recommendations regarding preservation, transplanting and trimming methods. A minimum of trees per g ross acre, comprised of the following sizes, shah be provided within the project: % - 48- inch box or larger, % - 36. inch box or larger, __ % - 24- inch box or larger, __ % - 15-gallon, and % - 5 gallon, A minimum of ,~) % of trees planted within the project shall be specirndn size Irees - 24-inch box or larger. _.J / 5. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls, sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on AuguSt 21. SC-12/93 4 o1' |2 7 Trees snail be planted in areas ot puDlic vaew adjacent to ant along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. All private slope banks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum. irrigated and landscaped witin appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy, 8. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet. but less th an 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope snail be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soflen their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. fl. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 9:1. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and va~ slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the I:~jyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Division to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are respen- sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscal:~,~l areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11 / / / / / / · Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Development Code and/or · This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. / / / / 12. The final design ol the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be / 1 included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to City Planner review and al~rovai and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Division. 'la dsca fe rr l'kill ! da. ' 13. Special n pe atu es~""~;z ...,~,,di~j. a~,.~h..al~.L-.,,-i-o ~,-.-~ "',eiRalar / / 14. La~i~ a~ imgm~n syste~ requjr~ to be installed w~hin the ~bliC ~ffi~f-way on / / the perimeter of th~ pmj~ area shall ~ conti~ously maintai~ by t~ deve~Hr. 15 16 17. All walls Shall be I~rovideq with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Division. / /~ Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. TheSe critena shall encourage the natural growth charac'lerisl~cs of the selected tree species. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of Xeriscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. · ~::-12/93 5of 12 F. Signs The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a pan of this approval. Any Signs proposed for this development sl~all comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signS. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or townhomes prior to occupancy and Shall require separate al~licat~on and apl~roval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Environmental The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice ol the City Adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault. in a standard formal as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer wri~en notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, pdor to accepting a cash deposit on any property. A final acoustical report shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The final report shall discuss the level ol interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL, the building matenals and construction techniques provided, and ff appropriate, verity the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformence with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies Emergency secondan/access shall be provided in accordance with Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District Standards. Emergency access shall be provided, maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 26 fat wide at all times during construction in accordance with Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District requirements. Prior to issuance of bullcling permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be sut}mitted tO the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District that ternl}orap/water supply lot fire protection is available, pending completion of required fire protection system. The applicant Shall contact the U. S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overtteed structure for mail boxes with adequate ligNing. The final location ol the mail ~;}oxes and the design of the oremead structure shall be sul)ject to City Planner review and apl:roval prior to the issuance of building permits. / / _,J / I / /. / I I / I I I ~ / __J / ___! / SC- 12/93 For projects using septk: tank facilities, wrifien certitication of acceptability, including all supportive information, Shall be obtained from the San Bernardino County Department ol Environmental Heallh and submitted to the Building Official pnor to the issuance of Septic Tank Pertorts, and pr~r to ,ssuance of building perre,is. 6ot' ~2 / /_ APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SIte Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code. Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other al~licable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safety Division for copies of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable han~outs. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to existing unit( s) , the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautifioation Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. e Prior to issuance of building permits for a new commercial or industrial development or addition to an existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, I:Hjt are not limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 4. Street addresses shall be provided by the Building Official, aftertract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of building permits. J. Existing Structures /~ 1. Provide corrallance with the Uniform Building Code for the property line clearances considenng use, area, and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing buildings shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities Shall be removed, filled and/or capp~ to comply with the Uniform Pluml3ing Code and Uniform Building Code. 4. Underground on-site utilities are to be located and ShOwn on building plans sumitted for building permit application. K. Grading Grading of the subject property s,hall be in accprd. ance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards, and sccepte~l grading, pra~til~s,-The final grading plan Shall be in substantial conform arms wilh the a,oproved grading plan. A soils report Shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of CalHornia to perform such work, The development is located within the soil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Distumance Permit is required. Please contact San Bemardino County Department of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit application. Documentation of such permit Shall be submittm:l to the City prior to the issuance ol rough grading permit. 4. A geological report shah be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of al~olication for grading plan CheCk. 5. The final grading plans Shall IDe completed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. / / / I / I I.. ! / / / I / I I / I I _.._1 / ,54:;-12/93 70f12 231 6. AS a custom-lot sul:x:livision. the following requirements shall De met: a. Surety shall be P~sted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary for alewatering all parcels to ttne satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto linal map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permits. A~propriate easements for safe disposal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to be delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and, Safety Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. C, On-site drainage improvements, necessary for dewatering and protecting the subdivided properties, are to be installed pnor to issuance of building permits for construction upen any parcel that may be subject to drainage flows entering, leaving, or within a parcel relatNe to which a building permit is requested. Final grading plans for each parcel are to be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or corr~osite basis.) e. All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with native grasses or planted with ground cover for erosion control upon completion of grading or some other alternative method of erosion control shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shall be provided. This requirement does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code. / ! / /__ / / __/ / APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 989-1862, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicaled to the City for all interior I~Jblic streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non. public facilities (cross-lit drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) slqall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Dedicabon shall be made of the folliwing rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street cente~ine): ~'~'f totll feet on ~/Z~, ~ torn feet on tolal feet on total feet on An irrevocable offer of dedication for for all prNate streets or dnves. -foot wide roadway easement ~hall 13e made 4. Non-vehicular access ellall I)e dedicated to the City for the following streets: SC-12193 Reciprocal access easements Shall De provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or Oy deeds and Shall be recorded concurrently with the map or pnor to the issuance of budding perre,re, where no map is involved. 8o1' 12 232 6. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage snail De prowcled and snail lae ,'jehneated or noted on the final map. 7. The final map shall clearly delineate a 10-foot m~mmum IQudding restriction area on the neighboring lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contmn me tollow~ng language: *l/We hereby dedicate to the City of Rancho Cucamonga the fight to prohibit the construction of (residential) buildings (or other structures) within those areas designated on the map as building reStrict/on areas." A mainlenance-agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to lhe City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face ot curos. If cur'o adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane. a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be provided. 11 · The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complele the improvements pursuant to Government Code Section 66462 at such lime as the City acclu ires the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement Shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to accluire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form ola cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer. at developers cost. The appraiser shall have been approveq by the City prior to commencement ol the appraisal. M. Street Improvements 1. All public irr;rovements (interiOr streets. drainage facilities, community trails, I::~seos, landscaped areas. etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shell be constructed to City Standards. Interior street iml:N'ovements shall include, but are not limited to. cur'o and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches. sidewalks, slreet lightS, and street trees. 2. A minimum of 26- fOot wide pavement. within a 40 -fOot wide dedicated right-of-way shall be constructed for all half-section streets. 3. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: /. / / / / / /__ / / / STREET NAME CUIqB& A.C. SLY,- 0RNE STRUT STREET CCliU MEDIAN BIKE GUTTER PVMt WALK APPR. UGhrrS TREES TIqAL ISLANO TRAIL OTHER 5C-t2/93 9 orl2 Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and =rrlgahon on meter (b) Pavement reconstruclion and overlays wdl be determined dunng plan check. (c) If so marked, side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (a} if so marked. an in-lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. X Improvement plans and construction: a. Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- lered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security sl~all be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion ol the public and/or pdvate street improve- ments, prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permitS, whichever occurs first. b, Prior to any work ~eing performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the City Engineers Office in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping. marking, traffic. street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed on any new construction or reconstruction of major, secondary or collector streets winch intersect with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: ( 1 ) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall 13e 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. e. Wheel chair ram los Shall be installed on all four comers of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. A street closure permit may be required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which Shall be refonded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows Shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single family lots. h. Handicap access ramp design Shall be as specified by the City Engineer. i. Street names sh~ll be approved by the City Planner prior to submittal for first plan check. 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any wod~ being performed on the pri- vate streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits Shall be obtained from the City Engineer's Office in addition to any other permits required. 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-galicn size or larger. shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program+ / /__ / /__ / / / __/ / ._,/ / sc-12/93 lOof 12 4. A permit tram the County Flood Control O{str,ct ,s required for work w~thin itsright-of-way. 5. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of time outside diameter of any public storm drain p~pe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey ovedlows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities 1. Provide separ,lte utility services to each Darnel including sanitary sewerage system. water, gas, electric Dower, telephone, and calDle TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. y2, The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 3. Water and sewer plans shall De designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (CCWD), Rancho Cucarnonga Fire Protection District. and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bemardino. A letter of compliance Irom the CCWD is required pdor to final map approval or issuance of peltnitS, whiChever occurs first. /____ / / /.. / / / / / / / Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries. shall ~ legall!~ c~mbined into one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. o · · · ' ' ' ' 2. An easement for a joint use ddveway shall be provided prior to final map approval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, for: ,/. 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deposit shall be pOsted with the City covedng the estimated cost of appodioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. 4. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional. and Master Plan .--/ -- Drainage Fees shall De paid prior to final map al~oroval or prior to building permit issuance il no map is involved. 5. Permits shall De obtained from the following agencies for work within their right-of-way: .__J __ , A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities District shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be Ix}me by the Developer. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be com- pieled beyond the phase Ooundanes to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfac'tion of the City Engineer. Phase Iooundaries Shall correspond to I~t lines shown on the approved tentative map. / /.__ / / 5C-12/93 12 of 12 7. Intersection line of s~te cles~gns snail be rowewed Cy the C,ty EnGineer for confcrmance w~tn adopted policy. On coiledor or larger streets, lines of sight Shall be plot'ted for all project intersections, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes shall be located outside the lines of sight.. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight snail be approved by the City Engineer. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2 +/- closest street trees on each side away from the Street and placed in a street tree easemeht. 8. A permit shall be obtaine,~3~_~,.,;ALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete I~dor to the issuance of building permits: / / / / / / N. Public Maintenance Areas 1, A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standan:Is shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to final map ap~oval or issuance of building permits, whiChever occurs first. The following landscape parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails. or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: 2. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval o r issuance of building permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be ix>me by the developer. 3. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems Shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the foliowing street(s) Shall conform to the results of the respective Beautification Master Plan: O. Dralnag® 1. and Flood Control The project (or portions thereof) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, flood protection measures shall be Ixovided as certified by a registered Civil Engineer and approved by me City Engineer. I1 shall be the developers responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone des.:Jnation removed from me project area. The developers engineer shall prepare all necessary reports. plans. and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Ma,o Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final mal) al~Sroval or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Mall Revision (LOMR) mall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or in'~rovemant acceptance, whichever occurs first. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and aDDroved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the ~ssuance of building permjts, whK:hever occurs first. All drainage facdihes shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 5C- |2/93 llof12 236 PUBLIC HEARINGS B,. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-08 - SANCHEZ {BABE'S CLUB 66) - A request to establish a night club and sports bar, including entertainment, amusement devices (video/arcade games), and the on-site consumption of alcoholic beverages, within an existing building in the Community Commercial Designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1077-601-07 and 08. Ce ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT 94-01 - SANCHEZ ~BABE'S CLUB 6G) A request to allow entertainment including, but not limited to, live bands, a disc jockey, karaoke, celebrity appearances, and comedy nights, in conjunction with a night club and sports bar in the Community Commercial Designation (Subarea 3) of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Hermosa Avenue - APN: 1077-601-07 and 08. Scott Murphy, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Commissioner Melcher asked if the Police Department's recommendation regarding having security personnel posted in the parking area was in writing. Mr. Murphy responded negatively. Commissioner Melcher felt the Police Department recommendations should be in writing. He questioned what would constitute a duly licensed security officer. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, replied that the State of California has specific requirements for being licensed. Commissioner Melcher asked if there are State licensing requirements for all security officers or only for armed security officers. Chairman Barker stated there are specific requirements for both armed and unarmed security officers. He said the lowest level would include training in procedures for making a citizen's arrest. Commissioner Lumpp asked if Condition 14 was meant to limit the hours every day. Mr. Murphy replied affirmatively. Chairman Barker noted the applicant proposed having security personnel within the building roaming the parking lot periodically, .but the staff recommendation was more specific. Mr. Murphy indicated that was correct and the conditions were written to require security personnel in the parking lot on a continual basis after 6:00 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes -2- June 8, 1994 Chairman Barker asked if the three handicapped parking spaces would be in compliance with regulations. Mr. Murphy replied the building will comply with iDA requirements. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. John Sanchez, owner, 12367 Snapdragon, Rancho CUcamonga, requested that they be permitted to remain open from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight from Sund&ys through Wednesdays and from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. on Thursdays through Saturdays. He felt that Thursdays through Saturdays would be their busiest nights. Me stated that if any problems occur during the first six months from midnight to 2:00 a.m. he would close at 12:00 midnight. Me said he decided to utilize valet parking to alleviate any problems of people mingling in the parking lot after they leave the club. He stated that in working at other night clubs he had noticed that valet parking avoids that problem. He said the owners of the motel were available to answer questions. Chairman Barker noted that in response to Question G on the Entertainment Permit Application, the applicant had indicated that there were no previous convictions or alleged offenses within the past 10 years with regards to specific mentioned persons. He asked if there are any other persons who are owners or are directly related to the organization for whom the answer would have been positive. Mr. Sanchez replied negatively. Chairman Barker asked if the patrons would be limited to those 21 years of age or older. Mr. Sanchez replied positively. Chairman Barker asked if they planned to train one person in CPR and Emergency Medical Technology, who would then train the rest of the staff. Mr. Sanchez said the individual who will be handling their security has already been trained in CPR etc. and he will be training their other staff. Chairman Barker asked if such training .would be a condition of employment if they should ever hire a new person to head security. Mr. Sanchez replied affirmatively. Commissioner Lumpp noted that in materials supplied by the applicant, there was a handwritten note that on Wednesdays they plan to have male exotic dancers and in typewritten information they supplied it indicated they plan to have lingerie shows on Wednesdays and Thursdays. Me asked if these events would be held simultaneously. Mr. Sanchez replied that they decided not to have male exotic dancers or the lingerie shows. Planning Commission Minutes -3- June 8, 1994 Commissioner Lumpp questioned Mr. Sanchez's previous experience so far as operating or owning a nightclub. Mr. Sanchez replied he has worked in nightclubs for the last eight years. He said he helped run the Gas House, was a manger at Black Angus, worked at Lace (a nightclub in Albuquerque, New Mexico), and was a part owner of the Boars Head in Covina~ He said he had observed what others did wrong and made a list and he is surrounded by people who know what they are doing. Commissioner Lumpp said that on the layout of the floor plan it appeard that anyone entering the sports bar would have to enter through the nightclub. Mr. Sanchez said a revised plan will be submitted with one entry into the sports bar and another into the club. He said those people entering the nightclub from the sports bar will have to pass through the security area and pay the cover charge. Commissioner Lumpp asked if the night club will be opening at 11:00 a.m. along with the sports bar. Mr, Sanchez replied it will not. Commissioner McNiel asked what time last call would be. Mr. Sanchez replied that last call is 1:30 a.m. Commissioner McNiel asked if that meant everyone is to be off premises at 2:00 a.m. Mr. Sanchez confirmed that was correct. Chairman Barker asked if recorders will be included with the closed circuit security cameras. Mr. Sanchez replied affirmatively. Chairman Barker asked staff if there had been discussions regarding shielding of the parking lot lighting so it would not enter adjacent areas. Mr. Murphy replied that they are proposing box type fixtures which will direct the light down as opposed to out so they should meet the Municipal Code requirement that not more than 5 foot candles can extend past the property line. Sam Lakkees, 10120 Foothill Boulevard, Rancho Cucamonga, stated he is co-owner of the adjacent motel. He said that although they have had some residents there for 3 to 4 years, they pay on a weekly rather than a monthly basis. He indicated less than 2 percent of the business is on a daily ~asis. He stated there had previously been a club in that location for about 12 years and the motel did not experience any problems because of it. Planning Commission Minutes -4- June 8, 1994 239 Hillel Dorel, stated he is head of security for the club and would be &vailable to answer any questions. Commissioner Lumpp asked if he had been a security manager in other operations. Mr. Dora1 rep1%ed affirmatively and said he had worked for the Ministry of Defense for Israel. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. Commissioner Lumpp noted that only one question had been raised by the applicant which concerned the closing time on Thursdays through Saturday. He felt it was a reasonable request and he supported approving the application. Chairman Barker noted that the resolution provided that no adult entertainment would be permitted. He said he had been given a clipping from a newspape~ regarding a topless club. He asked if this club could become a topless club and reopened the public hearing so Mr. Sanchez could respond. Mr. Sanchez said it will not be a topless club. He said they had written in their lease that the lease would be automatically terminated if they have topless or nudity in the club and he did not plan to have either. Chairman Barker stated it would also be stated in the Conditional Use Permit. He again closed the public hearing and asked if the City Attorney was comfortable with the regulations. Ralph Hanson, Deputy City Attorney, stated that the City adopted an amendment to the Development Code to restrict the location of potential adult uses. He said this location would not be in one of the areas permitted for adult uses and he thought the City would have sufficient legal grounds to stop such a use. Commissioner Lumpp asked if there would be a physical separation between the convenience store and motel and the nightclub. Mr. Murphy replied that a condition calls for the installation of a planter and fence between the uses. Mr. Buller noted that the proposed planter is shown on the exhibit and the area will not be completely secure because there will be two drive aisles which will allow pedestrians or vehicles ~o maneuver be=wean the two properties. Commissioner Lumpp noted the Commission would be reviewing the application in six months and said he supported the application and agreed with the applicant's request for extended hours. ' Motion: Moved by McNiel to adopt the resolutions approving Conditional Use Permit 94-08 and Entertainment Permit 94-01 with modifications to extend the permitted hours of operation to 2:00 a.m. on Thursdays through Saturdays. Planning Commission Minutes -5- June 8, 1994 Commissioner Melcher seconded the motion but thought there was a conflict ~etween Planning Conditions No. 2 and 12 on the Conditional Use Permit resolution. He noted that Planning Condition No. 2 indicates a landscape planter may be located on the adjoining parcel but Condition No. 12 indicates the landscape planter is to be completely on site. Mr. Murphy res.ponded that Condition No. 2 refers to the planter between the motel and the nightclub while Condition No. 12 pertains-to the parking area north of the building. Commissioner Melcher asked if the property is within a Foothill Boulevard activity center area. Mr. Murphy stated the activity center extends from the intersection of Turner and Foothill to include the property. Con~nissioner Melcher stated he was concerned about Engineering Conditions No. 3 and 6. He asked how long staff felt it would take to get a ruling from CalTrans regarding the median. Mr. James did not know how long it will take. Commissioner Melcher preferred that Conditions No. 3 and 6 be combined and the applicant be permitted to post half the cost of construction of the median if CalTrans has still not decided at the time that all other conditions have been met. Mr. James observed that the applicant would be fully developing the site and half the share of median construction along the property frontage would be far less than the entire median would cost. He noted that CalTrans may grant approval for the median to include several hundred feet in order to construct a closure across his driveway. He commented that once occupancy is granted, the City would have no leverage. Con~nissioner Melcher noted that the applicant had not objected but he felt that if the applicant satisfies all of the other conditions, he did not think it would be fair to force him to wait for CalTrans to decide how much median would need to be built. Mr. James stated that the condition' is included because of a traffic concern. He noted the applicant is increasing the parking area and closing off the kitchen area and adding more occupancy to the existing structure. He said the increase in traffic, the current location of the driveway, the proximity of other driveways, and the relationship of the driveway to Hermosa were all considered. Commissioner Melcher stated he was not debating that there is a concern, but was stating that if the applicant complies with all other conditions and is still waiting for a response from CalTrans, it would seem unfair to delay the project further. Planning Commission Minutes -6- June 8, 1994 241 Chairman Barker noted the motion included only a modification with regard to hours. He asked how the other Commissioners felt about the issue raised by Commissioner Melther. Commissioner Lumpp agreed with Commissioner Melther that CalTrans can delay the project. He asked if Commissioner Melther was asking staff to create a bonding mechani~sm. Commissioner Melther replied negatively. Me said his understanding was that Condition No. 6 would allow the applicant to make a contribution towards one- half the cost of the median if CalTrans indicates it will not allow installation at this time. He felt that an aggressive applicant could probably satisfy all other conditions within 60 to 120 days, but satisfying Condition No. 3 could delay the opening of the club well into the future. He said that even at th9 end of that time, CalTrans could still deny the median, at which point the City would accept the contribution, and he preferred to allow the applicant to make the contribution when he has satisfied all the other conditions. Commissioner McNiel asked if the median would be installed if CalTrans approves it. Commissioner MeZcher suggested that Condition No. 3 remain but that the appZicant be allowed to revert to Condition No. 6 if all other conditions have been satisfied and CalTrans still has not made a determination. Mr. Buller read Condition No. 3 to mean that the applicant must proceed forward with CalTrans to find a solution. He said staff could not support a modification that would allow the applicant not to address the traffic issue and merely pay an in-lieu fee. He thought there should be some level of traffic device placed in the street to the satisfaction of CalTrans before occupancy should be granted. Commissioner Melther felt that would be an astonishing burden to place on the applicant. Chairman Barker noted the City has no control over CalTrans. He understood the safety factor making the median necessary. He asked if an alternative could be presented. . Commissioner Melther felt it would be incumbent on the applicant to pursue Condition No. 3 with all due diligence and create a paper trail to show that he has tried to meet the condition. Mr. Buller suggested that the condition could be modified that if, after a specified time, the applicant has shown due diligence in an effort to obtain CalTrans approval, the City Engineer could grant an exception. Commissioner Melther sensed that 'giving the approval back to the City Engineer would be hanging onto it. He noted that Condition No. 6 would allow the applicant to pay half the cost if CalTrans does not allow installation of the median and there would be no traffic control in that case. Planning Commission Minutes -7- June 8, 1994 Mr. James commented there had been no traffic study but it is staff's opinion there is a possible traffic conflict because of the increase in traffic use. He said that if CalTrans reviews the project and feels that the installation of a median at this time will be more of a detriment to the rest of the traffic flows within their street, they may refuse installation of the median and would have accepted liability of whatever increased traffic conflicts there may be. He said in that case, the City would ask that the applicant be responsible for'their frontage improvements which would be half of the median island cost. Mr. Murphy suggested the applicant be required to post a bond for the full cost of the improvements. He said the funds would then be available if CalTrans gave approval or the applicant could make the one-half contribution if CalTrans did not approve the median. He thought that would protect the City but still allow the applicant to occupy the structure. Commissioner Melcher felt that was a reasonable solution. Commissioner Lumpp suggested that the City Engineer work with the applicant to obtain a solution from CalTrans. Commissioner McNiel accepted the change to the motion. Commissioner Melcher accepted the change to the motion. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NONE TOLSTOY -carried VARIANCE 94-03 - RITTENHOUSE - A request to reduce the amount of common open space from 35 percent to approximately 25 percent for a proposed 20- unit residential detached condominium project on 3.0 acres of land in the Medium Residential Development District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, west of Alta Cuesta Drive - APN: 202-025-01, 04, 07, and 08. Ee ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT 14208 - RITTENHOUSE - The proposed development of a 20-unit residential detached condominium project on 3.0 acres of land in the Medium Residential Development District (8-14 dwelling units per acre), located on the north side of Base Line Road, west of Alta Cueeta Drive - APN: 202-025-01, 04, 07, and 08. Steve Hayes, Associate Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Ralph Rittenhouse, 400 North Santa Anita Avenue, Arcadia, felt it is an ideal development. Planning Commission Minutes -8- June 8, 1994 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Beverly Luttrell, Associate Planner CONSIDERATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH - Appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving a request to construct a temporary multi-purpose building of approximately 3,840 square feet on approximately 5 acres in the Low Residential District of the Etiwande Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of East and Highland Avenues - APN: 227- 071-77. R~COmATIO8 The Planning Comission recommends approval of the project. If after receiving all public input and testimony, the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Con~nission, denial of the appeal would be appropriate. SU~I~a~Y On July 27, 1994, the Planning Comission approved Conditional Use Permit 94-07. An adjacent developer, Citation Homes, has filed an appeal (see Exhibit "A") which generally echoes their concerns that were voiced at the Comission hearing (see Exhibit "B"): The composition roof on the modular structure and the architectural detailing on the structure is not consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Design Guidelines. 2. The gravel parking lot should be paved with asphalt. Location of the parking in relation to the Citation Homes property will make it difficult for them to sell homes on the remaining lots adjacent to the church. - 244 CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH September 7, 1994 page 2 ANALYSIS A brief review of the above items follows. Following a public hearing, the Council may act. on any of the items individually or the project as a whole. 1. Gravel parking lot: The Development Code allows gavel surfacing if it can be shown that such material will not cause adverse effects and that it will remain in a usable condition (Section 17.12, 030 .A5) . It was determined that the gravel parking lot will be temporary, ( five years under the Conditional Use Permit application) and that there will be no adverse effects associated with the proposal. Additionally, the church will be required to provide an aspbaltic concrete lot when the property ultimately develops. St. Clare of Assisi Church submitted a Master Plan for ultimate development of their site which was approved by the Planning Co~nission. It was also found that the gravel lot would be more in keeping with and sensitive to the Ernst Mueller Home which is a designated local landmark located on the property. The Ernst Mueller House is also is a potential State and National Register historic structure. 2 · Architectural style: The appellant indicated he was not satisfied with the level of architectural design of the modular building. Citation Homes does not believe the design is consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan Architectural Guidelines and would be out of character with their homes. Additionally, the appellant has noted that the structure will be visible from the upstairs bedroom windows of homes along the east property line. As required by Code and the City ' s Historic Preservation policies, the modular structure was designed to mimic the lines, and materials of the Ernst Mueller Home while remaining as unobtrusive as possible. Even though the structure is a temporary one, a gable roof was incorporated into the building design to be sensitive to the gable roof lines of the Ernst Mueller Home and the surrounding single family neighborhood. The composition shingle roof proposed by the church is consistent with the roof material of the Ernst Mueller Home. The colors and siding material proposed for the building also are sensitive to the existing historic landmark. 3. Site Plan: The appellant believes there is not enough buffering between the parking lot and the south property line. He felt this would make it difficult for Citation Homes to sell homes adjacent to the church. The building and parking area were located on the southerly portion of the site for the following reasons: CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CUP 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH September 7, 1994 .Page 3 to minimize removal of the citrus grove and therefore, preserve the historic context of the Ernst Mueller Home as a citrus ranch. to not interfere with construction of the eventual permanent church facilities. to avoid eventual Caltrans plans for Route 30 Freeway which will effect the northerly portion of the site. With regard to buffering, there is an existing Eucalyptus windrow along the sputherly portion of the site. This has been required to be preserved and augmented with additional tree planting. Additionally, the existing citrus grove acts as a buffer and will be required to be regenerated. The proposed structure is located 100 feet from the south property line and 130 feet from the east property line. This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper and the property has been posted. The Planning Division has also received numerous letters in support of the project from neighboring residents. These letters will be forwarded to the Council under separate cover. City Planner BB:BL:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Appeal Letter Exhibit "B" - Planning Commission Minutes dated July 27, 1994 Exhibit "C" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 27, 1994 Exhibit "D" - Etiwanda Specific Plan Residential Design Guidelines Resolution of Approval * July 28, 1994 -. RECEIVED ~TY OF " RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CL F~qk' AUG 1 1994 City Clerk CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 Re: CUP 94-07 Dear City Clerk: We hereby appeal the July 27, 1994 decision of the Planning Commission in approving CUP 94-07, and request our appeal be heard by the City Council. This CUP was approved for an interim church use that fails to meet even the most minimum of the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards and as such, will create significant adverse economic and aesthetic impacts on our adjacent development. We are particularly concerned about the architectural standards of the "interim" church building. as well as the gravel parking lot and location of parking. Sincerely, CITATION BUILDERS.i~ r. Develoi: Manager / ml It ISl? ~e,'Jnmll Avenue Suli:e 100 TuStln CA 926~0 ~714) 258-1300 FAX (7141 258-1415 irman Barker suggested that the matter of a standard trash enclosure detail dered separately from the action before the Commission tonight. Motion: and adopt the of the requirement trash enclosure. Motion AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: , seconded by Lumpp, to issue a Negative approving Conditional Use Permit deletion ~lf-closing door on n access to the the follo~ BARKE] MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY -carried Commissioner studied. reed that the issue of the should be further It consensus of the Commission that the issue further Ce ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH - A request to construct a temporary multi-purpose building of approximately 3,840 square feet on approximately 5 acres in the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of East and Highland Avenues - APN: 227-071-77. Beverly Luttrell presented the staff report. Commissioner Melcher noted that the Design Review Committee had questioned if it is really necessary to have two points of ingress and egress from East Avenue and the Fire Department has indicated it would not be necessary if an L-shaped or hammerhead turnaround arrangement is provided. He ~uestioned if the driveway and parking lot arrangement proposed for the first phase is adequate. Ms. Luttrell stated the Fire Department has not yet reviewed the proposal with the northerly driveway deleted and they would be sure it meets their requirements. She said they had indicated at the Technical Review Committee meeting that they were not opposed so long as the driveway meets their requirements. Commissioner Melcher hoped a hammerhead turn would not force an unnecessary expansion of the parking lot. Ms. Luttrell said it was her understanding that the aisles do not need to be wider. Commissioner Xelcher questioned if Engineering Condition. 3g, requiring construction of a reduced radius turn-around at the south property line, could be deferred until the future development of the vacant lot which is part of the project to the south. He felt it is an unfair burden to place it on the church. Planning Commission Minutes -5- July 27, 1994 · pan Coleman, Principal Planner, stated the condition is consistent with past Commission practice where stub streets have been closed off by a proposed development. He said the Commission has always required the developer whose development calls for elimination of the through street to provide the finishing work to such stub streets. He said the street had initially been intended to extend to the north, but the church plans calls for closing off the street. Commissioner Melcher said he understood, but he felt the stub street had been put in as a convenience for the developer to the south. He thought in the future, when someone is given approval for a stub street, they should post a deposit to construct a terminus to the street if development other than what is anticipated actually takes place and the street becomes a dead end. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that many times it is not known if a street will be continued or if it will become a modified cul-de-sac. Commissioner Melcher said he understood and that's why he thought a bond or a refundable deposit should be provided if future development does not require the connection in order to avoid placing a burden on a future adjacent developer. Commissioner MeNial felt it would not be feasible to apply deposits to cover such possible contingencies. He felt that developers of adjacent properties know what the conditions are at the time they propose their development. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. The Reverend Elizabeth Habecker, Vicar of St. Clare of Assisi Church, 6563 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, stated the church members are happy their property is an historic landmark and they intend to proceed cautiously in the development of the property in order to retain the historic appearance. She said they plan to do replacement planting of citrus trees when needed and that would be most of the landscaping in the first pha.se of development around the parking lot. She said that CalTrans has promised to designate a committee to work with them as the freeway plans progress. She requested deferring the sidewalks, curbs, gutters, street lights, and street trees along East Avenue until CalTrans has determined what changes there will be to East Avenue and the corner of Highland and East. She suggested those issues could be addressed at the time of permanent development on the property so that such improvements would not be ripped out when CalTrans changes East Avenue. She asked that the decorative pavement at the entrance to the driveway be delayed until East Avenue is fully constructed for the freeway. She asked if the drainage assessment fee could be delayed until permanent development rather than being paid now since the current proposed development is only temporary. Commissioner Eelchar stated it was his understanding that Engineering Condition No. 3 does not commit the church to any expense at this time, but only a guarantee thee certain things will be done at the time of future development. Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer, responded that was correct. Planning Commission Minutes -6- July 27, 1994 °Commissioner Melcher asked how that would relate to the requirements for improvements along East Avenue. Mr. James replied that the improvement requirements along East Avenue apply only to the area between the south property line and the driveway, which is approximately 85 feet. He said the development to the south has already improved East Avenue including curb and gutter, street lights, and landscaping. He indicated staff feels the request is reasonable because the driveway is shown on the church's master plan as a master plan location and that area is over 600 feet away from the Highland and East intersection and the currently proposed elevation change is 10 feet which should allow room to make up the grade differential or a potential realignment. He said if a street light is needed, it would only be one. Commissioner Melcher asked if the applicant understood the requirements only currently apply to the 85-foot frontage at the southern end of their property. The Reverend Habecker indicated she understood. She said the people at CalTrane have indicated they are not as certain about the proposed elevations. She said CalTrans also has made a commitment to protect the house, and has indicated the centerline of East Avenue may be moved to the west if necessary. She observed that CalTrans deliberations start at the church's southern property line. Commissioner McNiel asked if CalTrans had indicated any timeframe for making its decision. The Reverend Habecker replied it had not. She said the church was now requesting the temporary building for that reason. Commissioner McNiel felt that any improvements installed may be considered permanent because of the length of the process with CalTrans. The Reverend Habecker said the church has made a very permanent dedication to preserving the property. She said a number of neighbors have stopped by to comment that they are glad the church plans to retain the orchard. She said that what it will eventually look like remains to some extent in the hands of CalTrans. She commented they hope to one day have an outdoor museum. Jerry Linton, Citation Homes, 15101 Red Hill Avenue, #100, Tustin, stated they own the adjacent development on the south and the east sides. He said they do not oppose the development but they have serious concerns about the standards of design being proposed on an interim basis for the church. He said the proposed building has a compo roof and does not have architectural features consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He objected to the gravel parking lot. He thought the design of the development places the negative aspects of the site layout adjacent to the Citation Homes property. He thought it will make it difficult for Citation Homes to sell homes adjacent to the church. He said the Commission placed strict design .standards on their 'property to make them consistent with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He thought the homebuyers were not being treated fairly if the church is allowed to construct a building which is not up to those standards even though it is proposed for an interim Planning Commission Minutes -7- July 27, 1994 · basis. He felt the interim basis may be for many years-and he did not feel 'the City would force the church to remove the building at the end of the maximum 5-year period. He asked that the church be required to comply with the same standards the rest of the neighborhood has to comply with. He asked the Commission to consider the impact of the interim standards on the surrounding development. The Reverend Habecker stated the color, siding, roof, and design of the building were chosen to be compatible with the historic farm house. She said it was their attention nat to be unusually situated in the neighborhood so as to draw attention, but rather to have the same appearance, color, and materials as the farmhouse. Mr. Linton stated the area was designated in the General Plan as Low Residential with the Etiwanda Specific Plan overlay with its exacting standards. He felt, there is a total disregard for applying the Etiwanda Specific Plan standards because the facility is only temporary. He said Citation Homes is particularly bothered by the architecture and the gravel parking lot. Hearing no further testimony, Chairman Barker closed the public hearing. asked for clarification on the drainage assessment issue. He Mr. James stated that City Council ordinance requires that drainage fees be paid at the time of building permit issuance and does not distinguish between temporary and permanent improvements. Chairman Barker stated the applicant had requested a deferment of changes on East Avenue and the decorative paving at the driveway and Mr. Linton had raised concerns about the design not complying with the Etiwanda Specific Plan including the gravel driveway. Commissioner McNiel saw no reason the improvements along East Avenue and the decorative paving should not be done because he felt it will be a long time before the freeway is constructed. He indicated he appreciated Mr. Linton's concerns but he said churches generally start out with small congregations and the City has set precedent with relaxing some terms with respect to churches to allow them to establish themselves in the community. He said he had been on the Design Review Committee at the time this project was reviewed and it was felt this is an interim facility and standards could be relaxed. He fully anticipated that if the five years should elapse, the City would require that the interim facility be removed. Commissioner Melcher felt there are interim facilities on other church properties which have existed for more than five years. He asked why Commissioner McNiel was making a commitment that this church would be forced to remove the structure at the end of the five years. Commissioner McNiel responded that the City has pursued oth&r organizations which have reached the end of their five-year period for temporary facilities. He felt it is fair to give the church an opportunity to have the temporary facility and he thought it also fair to point out that there is a five-year maximum time for temporary facilities. Planning Commission Minutes -8- July 27, 1994 251 · Commissioner Melcher said he had a problem with Commissioner McNiel's position that no extensions would be allowed past the five years when other facilities have been allowed past the five-year period. Commissioner Tolstoy supported the requirements stated by staff. Commissioner Lumpp supported the conditions of approval as proposed by staff. He expressed concern about the gravel parking lot. He said the first phase appears to be laid out to tie in to the ultimate master plan design and he felt the parking lot should have a permanent surface rather than gravel. He said he appreciated Mr. Linton's comments with regard to the standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan but he felt the interim building has made an attempt to coordinate with the existing historical building in that the materials are very similar to the existing building. He said other temporary structures are generally of a lesser quality than that being proposed. Commissioner Melcher stated his only concern was with Engineering Condition No. 3g regarding construction of the reduced radius turn-around and he hoped the Commission could visit that issue independent of an application at some point in the near future. He supported the application as submitted with respect to the architecture and paving materials. Commissioner McNiel stated he belongs to a church which had a gravel parking lot for two years. He did not object to the gravel parking lot. Commissioner Tolstoy supported the gravel parking lot. Motion: Moved by Melcher. seconded by McNiel, to issue a Negative Declaration and adopt the resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 94-07. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NONE NONE -carried u. '~IRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 93-49 WESTERN LAND_ - The dev, lo .,t of an integrat,d .hopping cent,r Of ~U~_"-v-~ totaling 222,605 square feet on 25 \ acres of; /-~n the 15 Community Ce~m.~M- District of the Terra Vista ~-~,,;,.~.~.~[~j~n~ located APN: 1077-421-58 and ~ Nancy Fong. Senior Planner. p sented t ~ -~Z~report. re Commissioner Tolstoy recalls had been a su~._i~ion that there should be pedestrian egress ~omery Wards Tire a~-~?~tter Center to this Ms. that the matter had been mentioned at the ~__~ Planning workshop and the conditions call for further Commission ~-.~ew and Planning Commission Minutes -9- July 27. 1994' DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT July 27, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~nission Braa Bull.r, City Planner Beverly Luttrell, AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH - A request to construct a temporary multi-purpose building of approximately 3,840 square feet on approximately 5 acres in the Low Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the southeast corner of East and Highland Avenues - APN: 227-071-77. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Action Requested by Applicant: Approval of a conceptual Master Plan and a temporary multi-purpose building and issuance of a Negative Declaration. South - East - West - Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Highland Avenue and Route 30 Freeway Corridorl Very Low Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) Single family residential (Tract 13945)~ Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) Single family residential (Tract 13945)~ Low Density Residential (2-4 dwelling units per acre) East Avenue and single family residentiall Very Low Density Residential (1-2 dwelling units per acre) General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Foothill Freeway Corrider~ Very Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Very Low Residential De Site Characteristics: The 5-acre site is currently the location of the Ernst Mueller Home which was designated a Local Landmark by the Historic Preservation Co~$nission on March 9, 1994, and by the City Council on June 1, 1994. The site is relatively flat and the home s~ts within a grove of citrus trees. Ninety year old Magnolia trees delineate the site along East Avenue. Eucalyptus windrows are located along the south property boundary and along Highland Avenue to the north. Three out buildings are also located on the site. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH July 27, 1994 .Page 2 E. Parking Calculations: Number of N,,mher of Type , Square Parking Spaces Spaces of Use Footage Ratio Required Provided Temporary Modular Church Master Plan Sanctuar~ 138 1:4 35 37 fixed seats ANALYSIS: 250 1:4 63 135 fixed seats TOTAL 98 172 Ae General: St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church is proposing to construct a 3,840 square foot modular building on the 5-acre site. The building has 138 fixed seats in the main sanctuary, one classroom, and two offices. The temporary building will be used for church services on Sunday mornings at 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. as well as other functions throughout the week. The existing home will be utilized for office space, meetings, and counseling sessions. In addition to the modular building, the church is seeking approval of a conceptual Master Plan for the overall development of the site. The Master Plan includes two permanent buildings and an expanded parking lot with access to Whitest.no Place. The Master Plan also include the creation of one single family lot which will be used as a possible future home for the Vicar· With the ultimate development of the church site, the modular building will be phased out. TAmporary modular structures are typically approved for an initial period of two years. The approval may be extended each year thereafter, upon written request, for up to five years. In addition to approval of this Conditional Use Permit, a Landmark Alteration Permit will be required, since the site on which the Mueller house is located is being altered. The house, however, is not being modified in any way. Review of the Landmark Alteration Permit has been scheduled for the August 10, 1994, Historic Preservation Conanission meeting. Design Review Comittee: The Design Review Conwnittee (McNiel, Melcher, Coleman) reviewed the project on June 14, 1994, and recommended approval with the following. conditions: The grove effect should be maintained and regenerated on the site. Some type of landscaping should be located between East Avenue and the interim parking lot. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH July 27, 1994 Page 3 Dense screen planting should be provided along the south project boundary adjacent to the gravel parking lot in order to screen the parking lot and car headlights from existing single family houses to the south. The Magnolia grandiflora trees along East Avenue have been determined to be historic. If trees are damaged during any required widening of East Avenue, they shall be replaced on a one-for-one basis with the largest grown nursery stock available. The location of the Magnolias should be included on the final landscape plan which will be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. Gates between the parking area and the emergency secondary access (northerly gravel drive) should be of decorative wrought iron. The Master Plan should be revised =o show hardscape and planter areas and to illustrate how pedestrian access between buildings will be accommodated. The layout and circulation for the Master Plan is acceptable. The building footprints noted are conceptual only. The emergency secondary access (northerly gravel drive) along East Avenue is disruptive to the historical context of the site and should be deleted if acceptable to the Foothill Fire District (see Exhibit "C"). Technical Review Committee: The Technical Review Co~nittee reviewed the project on June 15, 1994, and approved it subject to the conditions noted in the Resolution of Approval. The Foothill Fire District indicated that the secondary access could be deleted if an approved turn-around is provided. De Grading Comanit=.e: The Grading Comittee reviewed the project on June 1994, and recommende~ approval. Although a portion of the citrus grove will be removed, said removal is exempt under the City's Tree Preservation Ordinance. E. Environmental Assessment: Part I of the Initial Study has been completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Par= II of the Environmental Checklist and has found no significant impacts on the environment as a result of this project. A detailed analysis of the potential impact of the proposed Route 30 Freeway upon the project is addressed in the Route 30 Environmental Impact Report on file in the Planning Division. If the Planning Commission concurs with these findings, then issuance of a Negative Declaration would be appropriate. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The project is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project wil~ not be detrimental to adjacent properties or cause significant adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the proposed use and site plan, together with the reco~nended conditions of approval, are in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Development Code and City standards. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CUP 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH July 27, 1994 Page 4 CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property has been posted, and notices have been sent to all property owners within 300 feet of the project. RECOMMENDATIO~r: Staff recommends that the Planning Counission approve Conditional Use Permit 94-07 through adoption of the attached Resolution of approval and issuance of a Negative Declaration. Respec ly subm ed, City Planner BB:BL:mlg Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit "D" - Landscape Plan Exhibit "E" - Modular Building Elevations Exhibit "F" - Building Perspective Exhibit "G" - Floor Plan Exhibit "H" - Conceptual Master Plan Resolution of Approval with Conditions ), ( I. |: o. I~(nd. rotd PLANNING-- m Wl PLANN'INC~ DIVISION TITLE:IA~F,_ EXHIBIT: ~) SCALE: FRONT ELEVATION SAINT CLARE OF ASSISI MULTI- PURPOSE HALL RIGHT ELEVATION crrY i{ANCI K) CIX~~,A H.ANNII',,K; I)IVEllIN rre, m: c, uP ~j ~-o 9 TITI.F: j3OIf.-DIN (;t ~J F-VAll ~NS EXI IllIT: [~" ( ~ :AI ,E: _ REAR ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8' = 1'-0" SAINT CLARE OF ASSISI MULTI- PURPOSE HALL SECTION CITY ()F RAI~U! K) CLUAIVKX~;A H,ANNIN(; I)IVigl]xl ITEM: (q-A, Jf~ ~L~- r)t7 T~TI.E: E~PVATi~F- PERSPECTIVE SAINT CLARE OF ASSISI MULTI- PURPOSE HALL CI'IT (T RAr~I K) CtUA~;A PI,ANNIN(; IMVISI(Ixl ITEM: TITI.E: ~()II, DII~('t EXI IllIT:. P" ,~ ~AI .E: __ CLASS SAINT CLARE OFFICE 0 0 & NARTHEX I PORGH I OF ASSISI MULTI- PURPOSE HALL ~----, TOILET ROOM OFFI C E - MECH. ROOM I1~ · I 'FLOOR I PLAN qCALc 1,8' = 1'- C!I T (T !~ANCi I0 CUCA~'~ H,ANNING DIVISION TITI,E: FZ~:)OF. EXI fir ~T ~:AI.E: _ PLANNINC~. D~ION TITLE: EXHIBIT: H SCALE: RESOLUTION NO. 94-68 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANtHe CUCA~ONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 94-07 FOR A TEMPORARY MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING OF APPROXIHATELy 3,840 SQUARE FEET AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST AND HIGHLAND AVENUES, LOCATED IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-071-27. A. Recitals. 1. St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church has filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit No. 94-07, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application.- 2. On the 27th day of July 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Ranthe Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolu~loa have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as followsz 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2, Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on July 27, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows~ a. The application applies to proper~y located at the southeast corner of East and Highland Avenues with a stree~ frontage of 6S3 fee~ along East Avenue and lo~ depth of 320 feet and is presently improved with the Ernst Mueller Home, a designated a Local Landmark$ and b. The proper~y to the not~ch of the subject site is Highland Avenue and the proposed Route 30 Freeway/the property to the south consists of single family homes, the property to the east is single family hemeel and the property to the wes~ is single family homeel and c. The development of the modular building and the eventual development of =he church Master Plan is sensitive to the historic site and will allow for preservation of the existing citrus grove which surrounds the Mueller Hemel and PLANNING COMMISSION ' 'OLL'TiO:; :;O. :--.2: CUP 94-07 - ST. CLAR~. JF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH July 27, 1994 Page 2 d. The Ernst Mueller Home has been designated a Local Landmark and a Landmark Alteration Permit will be required to be approved with this application. 3. Based upon =he substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. b. That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. c. That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the proJec~ will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follcws~ a. That the Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the State CEQ& guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent Judgment of the Planning Commissions and, further, this Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the prepused project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Planning Comelesion finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the propused pro~ect will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildills depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the Planning Commission during the public hearing, the Planning Commission hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. PLANNING COMMISSION 'SLUTiON NO. CUP 94-07 - ST. CLAR= OF ASSISi EPISCOPAL CHURCH July 27, 1994 Page 3 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard COnditions, attached hereto and incorporated heroin by this reference: Planninu Division 1) 2) The temporary modular building is approved for an initial period of two years. The applicant may request three additional yearly time extensions for a total of five years. The structure shall be removed five years from the date of occupancy. Decorative paving, outside the public right-of- way, shall be added to the southerly driveway on East Avenue. 3) The grove effect shall be maintained regenerated on the site. and 4) Landscaping shall be provided between East Avenue and the interim parking lot to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 5) Dense screen planting shall be provided along the south project boundary adjacent to the gravel parking lot in order to screen the parking lot and car headlights from existing single family houses to the south. The Magnolia grandiflora trees along East Avenue have been determined to be historic. The trees are protected under Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 19.08 and shall not be removed without review and approval of a Tree Removal Permit. If trees are damaged during any required widening of East Avenue, they shall be replaced on a one-for-one basis with the largest grown nursery stock available. The trunk location of each Magnolia tree shall be plotted on the final Grading Plan and Landscape Plan which will be reviewed and approved by the City Planner. 7) The Master Plan shall be revised to show herdscape and planter areas, and to illustrate how pedestrian access between buildings will be accoemodated. PLANNING CUP 94-07 - ST. CLAR~ OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH July 27, 1994 Page 4 8) The emergency secondary access along East Avenue is disruptive =o the historical context of the site and shall be deleted and replaced with a turn-around to the satisfaction of the Rancho Curamong· Fire Protection District. Engineerins Division 1) Install curb and gutter, drive approach, and sidewalk for approximately 8S feet from the southerly property line ·long East Avenue. 2) ProVide an irrevocable offer to dedicate for the extension of Whitestone Place to Highland Avenue. Said dedication for the future alignment shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Planner and shall be situated to accommodate a build·hie lot in accordance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3) Provide · modified lien agreement to guarantee the right-of-way dedication and construction of the following items upon future development of the site: ·) Dedicate additional right-of-way on East and Highland Avenues nerosoar7 for the construction of the future freeway overpass as determined by Caltrans. b) East Avenue along the frontage of the project site from the south project boundary to the intersection with Highland Avenue. c) Highland Avenue full width from the east project boundary to East Avenue including undergrounding existing overhead utilities on the opposite side of Highland Avenue. d) Full intersection improvements including traffic signals at the intersection of Highland and East Avenues to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The developer shall receive cre41t and · reimbursement for improvements o and necessary right-of-way acquisition from the Transportation Developsent fee for the portion of improvements determine~ by the City Engineer to be over that needed for the impacts of this development in conformante with Ordinance No. 445. CUP 94-07 - ST. CLARE JF ASSiSI EPISCOPAL CHURCH July 27, 1994 Page 5 e) Extend local storm drain facilities along Highland Avenue from existing storm drain constructed by Tract 13945 westerly along the project frontage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. * f) The existing overhead utilities (talecommunications and electrical) on the project side of East Avenue shall be undergrounded from the first pole on the north side of Mighland Avenue to the first pole off-site south of the project south boundary, prior to public improvement · acceptance or occupancy, whichever occurs first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted cost for undergrounding from future development (redevelopmatt) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. g) Construct a reduced radius turn-around per City Standard Drawing No. 113 within existing right-of-way of Brownstone Place at the south property line. Remove existing concrete "v" ditch within said right-of-way and reestablish drainage to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Any retaining wall necessary due to grade differential shall be placed on private property. h) Construct the extension of Whites=one Place to Highland Avenue to full City Standards. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. ATTEST~u~~ 1994. PLANNING COmMiSSiON P"OLUTiON NO. ~-.: CUP 94-07 - ST. CLARk F ASSISi EPISCOPAL CHURCH July 27, 1994 Page 6 I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning CommissiOn of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Cammission held on the 27th day of July 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE DEPARTMENT OF "'"' ° COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I1 STAN-DARD CONDITIONS PROJECT #: SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ThoseItems checked are Condifions of Approval. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DNISION, (909) 989-1861, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: TIme LiraIll 1. Approval shall expire. unless extended by the Planning Commission. if INilding permits are / / not issued or approved use has nol commenced within 24 months from the dale of approval. 2. Development/Design Review shall be approved prior to / / C4/P //- 3. ~ a of ~,,u;.a T;ar.4 No. ~'~"'~ 7 i granted 4. The deve~ol~er shall commence, participale in, and consummate or cause to be commenced, / / participated in, or consurnmatm:l, a Melio-Roos Community Facilities Oislrict (CFD) for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection Oistria to finance construction anti/or mlnlenance of a fire station to serve the development, The station shall be Iocat~cl, designed, anti 13uill to all specifications of the Rm Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and shall become the Districts property upon conq3ietion. The equipment shall be selecteel by me Oimria in accordance with its neeell, In any I=uilding of a station, Ihe developer shall comply with all ai:q~licable Ilws anti regullltons, The CFD Shall be formed by the District and the developer by the time raiX)rdtion of the final map occurs. 5. Prior to recordslion of the final rna~ or the issuance of I:xailding permits, whicheve comes first, the al:~icant Shall consent to, or Participate in, the estaDlishmenl of a Mell~,Roos Community Facilities District for the construction and maintenance of necessary SChool facilities. However, if any. school district has Ixeviously estaDlished such a ~,ommunity Facilities District, the appiicanl sh~ll, in the sltemaive, consent to the annexlion ot the project site into Ihe territory of suctt existing District prior to the recordltion of the fini map or lhe issuance of building Parmils, whichever comes first. Further, it Ihe affected school district has nol formed a Mello-Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months from the date of al:~mval of the project and prior to the reCordation of the final map or issuance of IDqjilding permits for said prolect, this condition Shall be deemed null and void. / / ~C-12193 loll2 This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and all alfected scrK}ol districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. Prior to recordslion of the final map or prior to issuance of I~uilding permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district that adequate sewer and water facilities am or will be available to serve the proposed project shall be suE)miEN to tht Department of Community Development. Such letter must have Been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map apGroval in the case of sulxlivislon or prior to issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. B, SIte Development 1. The site shaU be develol:Hsd and maintained in accorclnce with the appmved pm which include site plans, arcttitectural elevations, exterior materials and colore, land,c~oing, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Division, the conditions conteinld herein, Developrnenl Code regulations, arid .Ir"'h'f, }d24"V~-e Specific Plan.eqe 'P~n,,~..'l Oo,,,,,,,mey. 2. Prior to any use of the project site or 13¢jsinesa activity being commenced thereon, al Conditions of Ateroyal shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Planner. 3. Occupancy of the facility shall not commence until such tim Is all Uniform Bulkling Code End State Fire Marshall's regulations haw been complied with. Prior to occupl~, plenl shafl be sulxnitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District end the Building ancl Safety Division to Show compliance. The 13uilding Shall be inspected for complilncl prior to occupancy. 4. Revise site plans and building elevations incoq3orating all Conclitions of Apl:NOvaf shall be submitted for City Planner review and al:Ixovaf prior to ismjance of building pemltl. 5. All site. grading, landscape, irrigation, and street irnlxovemenl plans ~ be coordirltKI for consistency priorto issuance of any pern'its (sum as grading, tree removal, encroachmere. building. etc.). or prior to final map approvaf in the case of I custom lot sulxlivision, or approved use has commenced. whichever comes first. A,opmval of this request shill not wive compliance with all Ilctionl of the ~ Code, all other applicst3tl CEy Ordinancel, anti appllcaf}lt Communily Fqarl or ,,Splcilic Plans in effect El the time of Bulkling Permit issuance. A detailed on-site igtling plln shafl be reviewed and a¢Ixove¢l by the Oily Planner Sharfff's I)epeelmem (989~611) prior to the issuance of bulk:ling petaltin. SuCh plen shall affec~ adjec~m properties. If no cenlrllzld trlsh m(llXlclu art proviclecl, all trash pick-up Ihafl be for intvtduel unitl wdh all receplacles Shieldl(:l from public view .... Trash recel~acle(s) arl requirld anti shal meet City IlarN:llnt, The final tiesign, Ioclttonl, and the rturlter of trash rlt4fXacte$ shall be sul~jecl to City PIInntr rlvilw end II::q3mvi prior to issuance of building permitS. 10. All ground-mounted utility al~purtenances such as trans$ormers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a cornl~nation ol concrete or masonry walls, berming, ancl/or landscel:)ing to the saislaclion of the City Planner. sc- 12/93 2o1'12 / / I / I / / I / / I / __,/ / ,_/ I I_ 7_ 11, Street names shall be sul3mitted for City Planner review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map. 12. All building numbers and individual units shall 13e identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. / /___ 13. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and / / weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Planner review and approval priorto approval and recorclation ol the Final Tract Map and I:ffior to al:}proval of s{reet improvemenl and grading plans. Developer shall ul:>gracle and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 4. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping of equine / / animals where zoning requirements forthe keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity fC&Rsagq3e. aling to boards of directors or homeowners' associations for amendments to the 15. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Artides of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the aCq:H'ovN of the Planning and Engineering Divisions and the City Attomey. They shall be recorclecl concurently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy Shall be provided to the City Engineer. [ 16. All parkways, open area, and landscaping shall be Permanently rnalntalnld I:W the PRM~)ere/ owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of thla landscape maintenance shall be submitted for City Planner and City Engineer review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purl:aose of assuming that each Io( or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained m a Declaration of Restrictions for the sulXlivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows i:ry vegetation, structures, fixtures or any other N)ject, except for utility wires and similar objects, pursuant to Development Code Section 17.08.060-G-2. 18. The project containS a designated Historical Landmark. The site shag be cleve.lppecl and maintained in accordance with the Historic Landmark Alteration Permit I%1o. gq H - O ~- · Any further modifications to the Me incitxling, but not limited to, exterior alterations ancVor interior alterreigns which affect IM exterlorof the buildings or strtM~um, removal of tireark trees, clemoltion, rclocalk~, reconstruction of buildings or structures, orctangel to the site, shall requlm a ~a~kakm to the HiStOriC Landmark Alteration Permit sulNect to Historic PreservalkH1 Coratasion review and approval. C. Building Design · / 1. An alternative energy system is required to provide domestic hot water for all dwelling units and for heating any swinvning pool or spa, unless other alternative energy systems are demonstrated to be of equivalent capacity and efficiency. All swimming pools indNled at the time of initial develoCk,.e,,d shall be sul~13lemanted with sow heatin0. 0etaill shal be included in the building plan8 and shall be submitled for City Runner revieW. and api:xoval prior to the issuance of building penTilts. Aft dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgracled with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment sul:}iect to City Planner review and apiDroval prior to issuance of building Permits. / / 3of t2 3. Standard patio cover plans for use 10y me Hon-. ~nerS' Association shall be submitted for City Planner and Building Official rewew and a :val prior to issuance of building permits. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projeclions, shall be shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as recluired by the Planning Division. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to. the satisfaction of the City Planner. Details shall be included in building pins. Parking and Vehicular Access (Incllcate ~letalls on I}uildlng plans) '~ 1. All parking lot landsca,oe islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet and shag contain a 12-inch walk adjacent to the parking stall (including cu~). / / ] / 2. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be --J J : ,ovided throughout the development to connect dwelling,~'units/buildin~s with open spaces/ '3s/recreational uses. 3 _-.arking spaces shall ~e double striped ;:- '~ity standards and all driveway aisles, _.J /.. .~rances, and exits Shall De striped per City ,: :ards. 4. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in / I depth from back of sidewalk. ' 5. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions shell re stdct the storage of recreational vehicle~ on this site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner artcl prordoll parking on interior circulation aisles other than in designated visitor laming areas. 6. Plans for any security gates shell be sul}mitted for the City Planner, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review ~ approval prior to issuance of iNilding permits. E. LandMqplng (for pul:)llcly maintained Ilndlclpe erell, refer to Sectkin N.) .A detailed landscape apd irrigation man, including slope planting And n'mclel home landscap. Ing Jn the case of resK- =.ntial development shall be Ixeoared by a liclnslJ IIr~ . architect and subrnitteq3 'Jr City Planner revew ancl appmva, priorto the iSmJatl~ol inkling permits or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot sulxlivision. 2. Existing trees required to be Weserved in place shell be Ixotected with a construction barde in accordancewith me Idunictpi C,,4xle Section 19.08.110, attcl so noled on the gracling plans. The location of Ittose trees to lie Ixersentecl in place and new locations for Irked trees shall be shown on the tietailed lanclscape plans. The mant Sham loBCat il of the aril)onal's recorrnenCllliOnl ~ preservation, transplaming ancl trimming methods. A minimum of Ireel pergross acre, comprised of the lollowing sizes, shall be providecl within the project: % - 4,8- inch i:)ox or larger, % - 36,. inch IX)x or Ileger, % - 2,1- inch I:X)x or larger', % - 15-galion, anti % - 5 A minimum of % Of trees planted within the W'oject Shall be specimen s :e trees - 24-inctl Ix)x e, larger. Within parkir,q totS, trees shall be plamed at a rate of one 1 S-gallon Iree for eve~/three parking stalls. sufficient to shade 50% of the parking area at solar noon on August 21. ,_/ / __/ / / / __/ I J_,./ 12/93 4of 12 6. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along struclures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. All I:N'ivate slope Danks 5 feet or less in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slolDe, but less than 2:1 slOpe, shag 13e, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with a,oC~opnate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent in'igation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. Ail private s Iol~es in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 orgreater slope snarl 13e landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their apCwarance as follows: one 15;gallon or larger size tree per each 150 scl. ft. of slol;N! area, 1 -gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. It. of slope area, and aPPmlxlate ground cover. In addition, slope I~anks in excess of 8 fee in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees ~ shnjbe shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slo¢~ plane. Sk:~e planting required by this ;;:-,:" 9. For single family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continu- ously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer untt e~,h individual unil is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupartcy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Oivision to detertrine trial they am in setislaclofy / /, _.J_ /. 10. For multi-family residential and non-residential development, property owners are raspon- / I sible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on-sle, as wel as contiguous . planted areas within me public right-of-way. An landscqi:sJ areas 811al be kefCX free from weeds and debris and maintained in a healthy and ttmving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material sham be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 11. Front yard landscaping shall be required per the Developmenl Code and/or __/.. /~ street trees and slope planting. . This requirement shal be in adeitlon to the required 12. The final design of the perimeter pareways, wile, landscaping, and sidewalM shall be / / included in the required landscape plans an~ shill be mji}jecl to Cly PIImer review an6 aptxoval end coordinated lot consistency wlh any pintway indr, l}t~ plan which may be required by the Engineer~g Division. 13~ecia~landsca~efeaturassuc~asm~Jndi~a~aviair~ck~q~c~izetrees~maander~ __/ . ~ng sidewake (with hortzonlal change), and intersdied lanacapir~ is required aJong 14. Landscaping and imgaticn systems required to be installe~l within the peak dgll-of-way on thepifbnllfottllll PmjecllrellhaJlbe(:x~mlintllne(ibythedlveicpe4,. / / growth maracteristiCs Of the selected tree slNcies. L I 7. Landscaping and irrigation shaU be designed to conserve water through the principles Of Xenscape as defined in Chapter 19.16 of the Rancho Cucarnonga Municipal ~. 15. All wallsshalbepmvidedwlhdecoradvetmalrnenl. If located in public maintenance areas, __/ / the design shal be coominaled with me Engineering Division, 16. Tree maintenance crileril sh,II be developed Ind sulN111it(I lot Cly PIInner i'eview IncI / / al:Croval pmr to iseuarr, e of 13uilcling pirmls. These cremtl M enoourage the rllurN __/. / sc- t2/93 5o1' 12 F. SIgns The signs indicated on the sul:)mitted I~lans are conceptual only and not a Dan of this al~roval. Any signs proC)osed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate al:Holication and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of any signs. 2. A Uniform Sign Program for this development Shall be submitted for City Planner review and al:q:}roval pdor to issuance of building permits. Directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium. or townhomes prior to occupancy and shall require separate aPPlication and approval by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. G. Envlronmentll The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Fourth Street Rock Crusher project in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, ;xior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the City Adopted Sl~ecial Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault, in a standard format as determined by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any propony. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the Foothill Freeway project in a standard format as determine<l by the City Planner, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 4. A final acoustical report shell be subm~ed for City Planner review and approval I:Nior to the issuance of building permits. The final report Shall diSCuSS the levl ol interior noise attenuation to below 45 CNEL the building materials and construction techniques pmvidect, and if appropriate, verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked for conformance with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. H. Other Agencies X 1. EmergencYsecondaryacceSSshellbeprovidedinaccordancewithRanchoCucamongaFire Protection District Standaras. ~ 2. Emergency access shallbeprovided, maintenance free andclear. a minimum of 26 feet wlde at all times during construction in accordance with RanchO Cucwnonga Fire Protection District recNiremenll. X3. , Prior to issuance el INiklk~ permits for correustible construction, evidence shall be submitled to the Rlncho Cucerrtonga Fire Protection District that temporary water supply for fire protection il availal)le, pending completion of required lira protection system. The alX)licant shall contacl the U. S. Postal Service to determine the al3txofxlate ~ and location of mail boxes. Multi-family residential deveiolxnents shall Ixovlde a solid oveft~eed struclure for mail I~xes with edKluate ligr~ing. The final location of the mail bexes and the design of the ovemead structure shall be subject to City Plarmer review and apl:xovai Ixior tO the issuance of building permits. P":-'CCt __./ / __J / -,J /.. / J / /.,.,_ I I. / / ,,.d / / / ,,,J / / / 5.C-I2/93 For projects using septic tank facilities, written certification of acceptability, including all su;q~ortive intormation, sham Ix obtained from the San Bernardino County Department ot Environmental Health and submitted to the Building 0ttic,al I;)nor to the iSSuance of Septic Tank Permits, and prg~r to ~ssuance ol building perrodS. __J APPLICANTS SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION, (909) 989-1863, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. SIte Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechani- cal Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applical:}le codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of issuance of relative permits. Please contact the Building and Safely Division for copies of the Code Adoption On:finance and applicable handouts. 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition /__J to existing unit(s), the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City 8eautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fees. estN~ishecl rate. Such fees may include, I~t are not limited to: Systen~ Oevelopmenl Fee, Drainage Fee, School Fees, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. ,_, J. Existing Structure 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform 8uilding Code for the property line clearances / /. considering use, area, and fire-resistiveness ol existing buildings, __ 2. Existing buildings Shall be made to comply with correct building and zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities srmll be removed, filled ancl/or capped to cornply with the Uniform PlurnIDing Code ancl Uniform Building Code. 4. Undeqiround on-s~te utilities are to be located and shown on building pins sulDmitted for building permit application. /. / / / /.. / K. Grading Grading of the subject property Ihall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Stan61rci, anti accepteel grading practices, The final gracing plln shell be in substantiN cl;rlrm,,,Incl will the II:q)mvecl grading pINt. A soils report ~ be prepeecl by a qualified enginee licetreed by the Stale of Calitomia to / / --/ / 3. The development is located within the SOil erosion control boundaries; a Soil Oistufoance ._J . Permit is recluirecl. Please contact San 8emarclino County I;)epanmenl of Agriculture at (714) 387-2111 for permit appUcation. Documentation of suctt permit shall IX SUlDmiII~I tO the City prior to the issuance ol rough grading perml. 4. A geological report shall be prepare ~ a clualitied engineer or geologist and summed at the time of applicalion for grading plan check. I / 5. Thefina~grading~ansstta~becompletedandappr~vedpn~rt~issuance~fbuildingpermits, / / 5C-12/93 701' 12 6. AS a custom-lot sul:x:livision, the following requirements snail be met: a. Surety shall be Posted and an agreement executed guaranteeing completion of all on-site drainage facilities necessary for alewatering all parcels to me satisfaction of the Building and Safety Division priorto final map approval and prior to the issuance of grading permils. I}. Appropriate easements for safe disPosal of drainage water that are conducted onto or over adjacent parcels, are to De delineated and recorded to the satisfaction of the Building and Safely Division prior to issuance of grading and building permits. c. On-site drainage improvements, necessary for alewatering and protecting the maiDdivided properties, are to be installed prior tO issuance of building permits for construction uPon any parcel that may be maDject to drainage flows entering, leaving. or within a parcel relative to which a building permit is requested. /.. / / / e, Final grading plans for each parcel are to be su: ,-nitted to the Building and Safety Division for approval prior to issuance of building and grading permits. (This may be on an incremental or composite basis.) All slope banks in excess of 5 feet in vertical height shall be seeded with naive grasses or planted with grou rid cover for erosion control upon cornplelion of grading or some other alternative mathod of erosion control shall be cornlNeted tO the satisfaction of the Building Official. In addition a permanent irrigation system shag be provided. This requiremerit does not release the applicant/developer from compliance with the slope planting requirements of Section 17.08.040 1 of the Development Code. I APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION, (909) 989-1662, FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: L. Dedication and Vehicular Access 1. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all intedor pubic streets, community trails, pul:}lic paseos, pul31ic landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities .as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-pulMlc facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be rasefve{I as show~ on the plans and/or tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street cAmedine): totll feet on 1~5 OF total feet on Iota feet on 3. An irrevocable offer of dedication for for all pnvate streets or drives. -foot wide roadway easemere sham be made 4. Non-vehiCular access Shall be dedicated to the City for the following streets: ._/ / / /_ sc-Z2/93 Reciprocal access easements Shall be provided ensunng access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and Shall be recorded concurrently w,trt the map or prior to Ihe issuance of t:xj,lding permits, where no map is involved. 8or 12 Prfvate drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provK:led and sl~all 13e delineated or noted on the final map. The final map shall clearly delineate a 1 O-foot minimum I:}uilding restriction area on the neighDoting lot adjoining the zero lot line wall and contain the following language: 'i/We herel}y dedicate to tl~e City of Rancho Cucamonga the rfgl~t to I~rOhii3it the construction of (residential) t~usldings (or other structures) within those areas clesignate~l on the rnal~ as Duik~ing restriction areas.' A maintenanc~ agreement shall also be granted from each lot to the adjacent lot through the CC&R's. 8. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be quitclaimed or delineated on .__/__.J the final map. 9. Easements for public sidewalks and/or street trees placed outside the publlo right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City wherever they encroach onto private property. 10. Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of cur'os. ff Cur'o adjacent sidewalk is used along the right turn lane, a parallel street tree maintenance easement shall be Provided. 11. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/She shoul~l Ill tO do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days I:N'ior to sumittN of the final map for approvN, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Governmere Code Section 66462 at such time as the City acquires the property interests required for the in13mvements. Such agreement shall provide for paymeht by the developerof aS costs incurr by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs Shall be in the form of a CaSh deposit in the muht given in an al:q:N'aisal report obtained by the developer, at developer's cost. The appraiser shag have been aDDroved by the City prior to commencement of the al~)raisat. M. Street Improvements All pul31ic improvements (interior streets, {Irainage facilities, community trite, p,Mlol, landscal=~l areas, etc.) shown on the plan~ aneor tentmlve malc~ shll be constmcte~l to C~ Standard. Interior street mpmve,,j,qts ~ inclu~, but are not limitm:l to, cufo and gutter, AC pavement, ddve approaches, skimwaits, stree~ Iigl~, ~ streel tren. A minimum of 26- foot ~ plvement, within a 40 -fool wide clKlic~lffi right-of-way shall be constnjctl~l for atl hil-leClil~ strletl. Construct the foeowing perimeter street irnpmvements including, 13ut not limitKI to: F'STREET NAM! ---J /~ / /. / / / / sc * 12/~3 9oF 12 Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meier. (b) Pavement reCOnStrUCtiOn and overlays will IDe determined during plan check. (c) If so marked. side- walk shall be curvilinear per STD. 304. (d) If so marked, an in*lieu of c;onstruCtion fee shall CarnDieuan Dl": X 4. IrrOrovement p.lans and constrUCtiOn: ae Street improvement plans including street trees and street lights, prepared by a regis- lered Civil Engineer, shall De sul~mitted to and al~roved by the City Engineer. Security shall be loomed and an agreement executed to the satisfactiOn of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion ol the public and/or private street improve- roems, prior to final mad al:~roval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Prior to any work I:~ing performed in public right-of-way, fee shall be paid and a constrUction permit shall De obtained from the City Engineers Office in aclditicn to any other permits required. C, ee Pavement stnping, marking, traffic. street name signing, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be install~l o n any new construction or reoonstruction of major, secondary or collector streets which interSeCt with other major, secondary or collector streets for future traffic signals. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: (1) All pull boxes shall be No. 6 unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. (2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pullrope. Wheel chair ramps Shall be installed on all four comerS of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. Existing City roads requiring construction shell amain open to traffic st 81 times with adequate detourS during construction. A street closure permit rnay be required, A cash deposit shall be ptovide~l to cove me cost of grading Ixl Nving, which shal be refunded upon cornpillion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Concentrated ~lralnage fires Shaft not cross sidewalks. Ur~ler sidewalt drains shall be installe{I to City Standan:Is, except for single family lois. /.. / I / h. HandiCJp access rarq} design shall be as specified by the City EngiNe. / i. Stremnamesshalbeappmveql:}ytheCityplannerprlortosumittNtorfirstplncheck, _j . 5. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets Shall be I:Lm~'vi~ for _,J review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any worn being performeel on the ~ vale streets, fees shall be pad and construction permits shall be o0tlinecl from the City Engineers Office in 8dclilion to any other permits required. 6. Street frees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or target, shall be installed per City Standards in ._/ . accordance with the City's street tree program. I I 5C-12/93 IO or12 7. Intersection line of site designs snail De reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted Dolicy. a. On collector or larger streets, lines of s~gnt shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Walls, signs, and slopes snail be located outside the lines of sight. Landscaping and other obstructions within the lines of sight snarl be approved by the City Engineer. b. Local residential street intersections shall have their noticeability improved, usually by moving the 2,+/- closest Street trees on each side away from the street and placed in a street tree easement. 8. A permit shall be obtained from CALTRANS for any work within the following right-of-way: 9. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of building permits: _.J / N. Pubtic Maintenance Area 1. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standarcl shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval prior to finn map appmvi or issuance of I:Nilding permits, whichever occurs first. The following axisCape ~ays, medians, paseos, easements, trails, or other areas are required to be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District: X 2. Asignedconsentandwaiverformtojoinand/orformtheagqxoWtmeLandscapeandLighting __/. / Districts shall be filed with the City Engineer prior to final map approval or issulnce of IDUilding permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 3. All required pul~lic landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously malnlajned bythe developer until accepted by the City. 4. Parkway landscaping on the following street(s) sham conform to the results ol the respective Beautificmion Masler Ran: __,/ / / / O. Drainage an~l Fkxxl Control 1. The project (or I:r, mion~ thereot) is located within a Flood Hazard Zone; therefore, Ilood protection rnemres shall be Ixovkled as certified by a regislered Civl Engineer and approve by IN City r-,ne:nssr, 2. It shall be the developers relponliblily to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the projecl area. The deveioper's engineer shall prepare NI necessary reportS, I:,arm, and hyClrolog~hyeaulic calculations. A ConclltionN Leder of Map Revision (CLOMR)- shall be or)taNned from FEMA larkDr to final maid ag~ovml of issuance of building permits, wNchever ocCurS firm. A Lelter of Map Revision (LQMR) Shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whiCr~ver occurS first. .... 3. A final drainage study shall be sumaired to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of building permits, whichever occurS firSt. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. __7 sc- 12/~3 II o/12 4. A permit from the County Flood Control District is requsred for work within rts right-of-way, 5, Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside cliameter of any public StOrm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree tnjnk. 6. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overllows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street. P. Utilities / / / / /. / 1. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric IDower, telephone, and cable T'V (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall 10e provided as required. 2. The developer shall ~e resl~nsibie for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. /. 3. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the --./_..J Cucarnon~a County Water Distr~ct (CCWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San BernardinD. A letter of compliance from the CCWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance el permits, whichever occurs first. /..__/ Q. General Requirements and Approvals 1. The separate parcels comained within the project boundaries shall be legally combned into /"' / one parcel prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to final map aplcxoval or ---/.. / issuance of building pamqits, whichever occurs first, for:. X 3. Prior to approval of the final map a deCx~sit shell be poSted with the City covering the estimated cost of al:N:~ortioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Regional Mainline, Secondary Regional, and Master Pin Drainage Fees shall be paiO prior to final map approval or prior to building permit issuance il no map is involved. 5. Permits shall be olcXainld from the fOllowing agencies for work withe their deN-of. way: / / 6. A signed con~lnl and waiver form to join and/or form the Law Enforcement Community Facilities Dillrlcl shall bt filial with the City Engineer prior to final map 41¢q:lmval or the issuance of 13uilding permits, whichever occurs first. Formation costs shell be borne I:}y the Developer. 7. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient imlxovemant plans sllall be com- pleted beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and dralr~ Ixoteclion to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase IxNjndaries shall correspon¢l to lot lines shown on the appmved tentalive map. I / 12/93 ~2 or 12 · · I · · · · · ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) .700 Article 5.42 Residential Projects of Five Dwellings or More Developed Under Optional Development Standards (Figure 5-3) .701 the project shah be designed in a manner that is not only sensitive to, and compatible with the character of Etiwanda, but also reinforces that character through an integrated design and architectural theme. .702 While no specific architectural style is required, the integrated theme selected shall reflect the traditional architectural styles found in Etiwanda, including but not Limited to the following: (a) Victorian Characteristics: fieldstone foundations steep gables and roofline porches and verandas bay windows vertical windows roundheaded windows clapboard & fascia board & batton siding large roof projections shake or composition roofing (b) California Bungalow Characteristics: Hip or gable roof/gently sloping Large front porehes/verandas Fieldstone foundations (e) California Ranch Characteristics: Low, rambling Rustic, informal (d) Any other integrated design style which in the opinion of the Design Review Committee meets the intent of this article. .703 Materials, textures, and architectural detailing shah be consistent with the design theme. 5-43 .704 ·705 .706 .707 .708 .709 .710 .711 Ar[ic[e 5.42 Colors shall be consistent with the design theme and compatible with facade materials. Multi-family structures shah be attached in small groups and clustered around common facilities. Building masses shall be broken by architectural elements such as overhangs, trellises, projections, reveals, and awnings, and other elements which contribute to the building's character. Attached dwellings shall be staggered to provide relief and a sense of variety. Attached units appearing in rows with blank facades shall be discouraged. Duplex and triplex units shall be designed to present an image of large scale family structures. In addition, generous setbacks should be provided to compliment the appearance of a large single family structure. Developments may be phased provided that each phase is integrated into a master plan which ensures completeness of functional and visual elements. Buildings shah be located in a manner which enhances the architecture and de-emphas. izes vehicular parking and circultion, This may be accomplished through landscaping techniques such as mounding or screening. Unless otherwise required for noise attenuation, solid fence materials should not be located adjacent to public areas (sidewalks, commons, equestrian trails, etc.). View fencing shall be used wherever possible to prevent a "walled" effect. A contiguous greenway designed to link private common areas with pubtic areas, shah provide at least one connection across the project site, and shall: (a) Have a minimum average width of 20 feet, but at no point be less than 10 feet wide. (b) Have adequate provisions for pedestrian circultion. (c) In the EQ/OL District, provide for equestrian (Feeder Trail) use, (d) (e) Provide a connection to an existing or planned greenway located on adjacent property. Be dedicated as an easement. 5-44 ', ~-?-~ ';' ~. ."- '. !'. " ','. "". i . ,' . ~ - -: ' ~ . i ; ~ "~- {%- " .. - --- ; ~, variety in . BARN STYLE ELEMENTS ~-; ,_._' - ":--""""- ~.. · ~ .:j jJ~j --~. ~._-_,- ~>- __.--.:._:_~_.~.-: fieldstone foundations, - veneers fieldstone walls, detailing traditional materials, cupolas variety in roof lines :"' ,'/" attention to detail ', -":' ,~,:~' -. ' - ., '~ ~' .~'., I~ -"~ ,. , ~"./.~' · ~ ~ , ~ ~'--:' -, -:~ ' . -~ ~ ~ ~ - _ '~- ~ ~ ~' ----- _ ~ertical win~ws, ~~: .~% _ lapboard md~ng steep gables, traditional detailing A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 94-07, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A TEMPORARY MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING OF APPROXIMATELy 3,840 SQUARE FEET ON APPROXIMATELy 5 ACRES IN THE LOW RESIDENTIAL DISTR/CT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST AND HIGHLAND AVENUES, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 227-071-77. A. Recitals. (i) St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church has filed an application for a temporary multi-purpose building as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject modular structure request is referred to as the "application." (ii) On July 27, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion of said public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 94-68 thereby approving the application. (iii) On July 28, 1994, an adjacent developer timely appealed the approval of said Resolution No. 94-68. (iv) On September 7, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (v) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part "A," of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced September 7, 1994 hearing, including written staff reports, the minutes of the above-referenced Planning Commission meeting, and the contents of Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-68, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at .the southeast corner of East and Highland Avenues on property zoned Low Density Residential, and is currently developed with the Ernst Mueller Home, a designated local landmark which is a potential State and National Historic Landmark. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO- CUP 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH September 7, 1994 Page 2 (b) The property to the north of the subject site is Highland Avenue and the Route 30 Freeway, the property to the south of that site consists of single family homes, the property to the east is single family homes, and the property to the west is single family homes. (c) The development of the modular building and the eventual development of the church Master Plan is sensitive to the historic site and will allow for preservation of the existing citrus grove which surrounds the Mueller Home. (d) That the proposed temporary modular structure is compatible with the architectural style, color and materials of the Ernst Mueller Home- (e) That the gravel surfaced parking lot is temporary and will be more in keeping with the historic context of the site and the eventual parking lot will be surfaced with asphaltic concrete- (f) That adequate buffering between the proposed structure and adjacent single family homes is provided. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the City Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Negative Declaration based upon the findings as follows: a. That the Negative Declaration has been. prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the .State CEQA guidelines promulgated thereunder; that said Negative Declaration and the Initial Study prepared therefore reflect the independent judgment of the City Council; and, further, this Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in said Negative Declaration with regard to the application. b. That, based upon the changes and alterations which have been incorporated into the proposed project, no significant adverse environmental effects will occur. c. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 753.5(c) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the City Council finds as follows: In considering the record as a whole, the Initial Study and Negative Declaration for the project, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have potential for an adverse impact upon wildlife resources or 'the habitat upon which wildlife depends. Further, based upon substantial evidence contained in the Negative Declaration, the staff reports and exhibits, and the information provided to the City Council during the public hearing, the City Council hereby rebuts the presumption of adverse effect as set forth in Section 753.5(c-l-d) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations- CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. CUP 94-07 - ST. CLARE OF ASSISI EPISCOPAL CHURCH September 7, 1994 Page 3 4. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: (a) That the proposed use is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. (b) That the proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (c) That the proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 5. This Council hereby provides notice to Citation Homes that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 6. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return-receipt requested, to Citation Homes at the address identified in City records. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager STAFF REPORT Brad Buller, City Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of various amendments to the Sign Ordinance R~COI~IL~ION The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed amendments through adoption of the attached Ordinance. AMALYSIS The proposed amendments respond to direction from the City Council to work with small business owners on temporary sign issues as a result of sign enforcement at Offroad Chicken. The Planning Commission formed a task force of small business owners, shopping center owners, and Chamber of Commerce representatives. The task force reviewed the current Sign Ordinance regulations for tenant identification. The task force determined that the primary issue is the inability of most small businesses to have their name on a monument sign at the street. The task force studied a range of options to address the needs of small tenant identification which were presented to the Planning Commission. The proposed changes to the Sign Ordinance are described in detail in the attached Planning Commission staff report (see Exhibit "1"). BB:DC:sp Attachments: Exhibit "1" - July 27, 1994 Staff Report to Planning Commission Exhibit."2" - June 22, 1994 Staff Report to Planning Conm~ission Exhibit "3" - Minutes of July 27, 1994 Planning Co~nission Meeting Exhibit "4" - Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-71 Ordinance DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 27, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Co~nission Brad Buller, City Planner STAFF REPORT Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of various amendments to the Sign Ordinance. ABSTRACT: This report presents an ordinance for your consideration based upon the discussion at the workshop on June 22, 1994. ANALYSIS: At the June 22 workshop, the Comission reached a consensus on the proposed changes to the sign regulations for shopping centers (see Exhibit "A")- The workshop discussion included representatives from various shopping centers within the community. Staff was directed to return with an ordinance for the Planning Commission to review. If approved, the ordinance will be sent to the City Council for final adoption. Monument Signs: Three options were presented to the Commission. The majority of the Commission indicated a preference for allowing up to two monument signs per street frontage as opposed to allowing larger monument signs. The Co~nission decided that either doubling the m,mher of monument signs to two per street frontage or doubling the size to 48 square feet was acceptable. The "either/or" approach recognizes the additional signage needs as projects increase in size, retains flexibility for the center owner, and is consistent with the City's goal to foster attractive sign solutions. In addition, the Commission agreed that the larger monument signs would be inappropriate for smaller comercial centers which generally do not have major anchor stores and have fewer tenants. Finally, the Co~nission, mindful of the City Council's original charge to the Commission to address the needs of small businesses, indicated that sufficient area mast be reserved on monument signs for tenants other than the major anchors. Staff believes that the length of street frontage is the most practical criteria for allowing larger monument signs. A survey was conducted of all shopping centers, except for regional centers, within the City of Rancho Cucamonga (see Exhibit "D"). In the 33 centers surveyed, the average length of street frontage was 573 feet. All neighborhood shopping centers have one or more street frontages exceeding 50~ feet. Only the strip commercial centers have less than 500 feet of frontage. The strip centers have fewer tenants and generally do not have a major anchor store. Therefore, staff would recomend that 48 square foot monument signs be allowed for centers with at least 500 feet of street frontage. pLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SOA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 27, 1994 .Page 2 For your information, staff has also compiled the monument sign regulation survey data p~ovided by Lewis Homes Management Corporation and Diversified Properties Company (see Exhibit "C"). The data indicates that sign regulations. vary considerably from city to city. Monument sign height varied from 6 feet to 45 feet. The maximum sign area ranged from 24 square feet up to 150 square feet in the cities surveyed. Be Temporary Signs: The Con~nission approved the proposed changes to the regulations concerning the use of temporary signs as outlined in the June 22, 1994, staff report (see Exhibit "B"). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission recommend approval to the City Council through adoption of the attached Resolution. Respect lly s 'tted, BB:DC/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Minutes dated June 22, 1994 Exhibit "2" - Planning Commission Staff Report dated June 22, 1994 Exhibit "C" - Monument Sign Survey Exhibit "D" - Shopping Center Frontage Survey Exhibit "E" - Letter from Lewis Homes Management Corporation Resolution of Approval Draft Ordinance Isloner McNiel supported the concept. He noted that the billlard club ad' to the theatres in Upland caters to a younger group and sometimes causes Is for theatre patrons. He though= this use would be similar to the club wh~ recently been approved for =he Masi Center. Motion: Moved by conded by McNiel, to direct to the appiicant to apply for a Foothill BouL Specific Plan amendment to add Commercial Recreation as a'conditional use Speciality Commercial District Motion carried by the following vote: ' AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ., MELCHER, TOLSTOY The Planning Commission moved to the DeAnza Room for the balal meeting. the H. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of various amendments to the Sign Ordinance. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report, highlighting the work of the Sign Task Force and the various options available to the Commission. Chairman McNiel praised the Sign Task Force's Participation and their efforts. He expressed his opinion that every time the Sign Ordinance has been reviewed it has been weakened; however, he felt that most of what the Sign Task Force had discussed was acceptable. Chairman Barker suggested the Commission discuss the items individually and reach consensus before moving on to the next type of signs. Grand Openin= Siqns: Commissioner Eelchar felt such signs should be require~ to include the opening date for the business. PauZa Dampsay, Chamber of Commerce and Lewis He~es Management Corporation, indicated that tenants commonly request a "Coming Soon" banner. There was a general consensus that the proposed changes were acceptable without a specific opening date display requirement. TemPorary Advertisinu Signs: Ms. Dampsay felt the proposed changes were positive because business Mere would have greater flexibility. She indicated that the changes are consistent with what her tenants typically ask for. Planning Commission Minutes -20- June 22, 1994 There was consensus that the proposed changes were acceptable. Monument Sians: Mary Rohrer, Diversified Properties Co., stated that the Sign Task Force had discussed the possibility of allowing property owners to choose either elation 1 or Option 2 presented in the staff report. She felt that property owners need such flexibility to respond to tenant needs and unusual site constraints. Chairman Barker agreed that such flexibility may be needed based upon the layout of the project. Ms. Dampsay indicated that Lewis and Diversified had surveyed other cities regarding monument sign regulations and determined that, even with the proposed changes, Ranthe Cucamonga represents the more conservative approach to signs. Ms. Rohrer agreed and listed the following survey results. Montclair - 60 sq. ft. (10 ft. high x 6 ft. wide) Ontario - 100 sq. ft. (20 ft. high) Upland - one 100 sq. ft. (16 ft. high} or two 60 sq. ft. (8 ft. high) Fontann - 30 sq. ft. (6 ft. high) or pylon with no limit Fountain Valley - 50 sq. ft. (8 ft. high) Irvine - 50 eq. ft. (6 ft. high) Mission VieJo - 36 sq. ft. (6 ft. high} Costs Mesa - 125 sq. ft. (25 ft. high) Dana Point - 100 sq. ft. (20 ft. high) Commissioner McNlel said the survey cities reflec~ the trend to have bigger signs. He felt that what other cities do should not be the basis for what Ranthe Cucamonga does, unless we want our c~munity to ~!c~ ~ coemonplace. Ms. Dampsay thought that Ol~lon I should allow 8-foot high signs instead of the proposed maximum of 6 feet, She noted that the Clty's current sign regulations allow S-foot high monument signs. Mr, Coleman indicated that the lower height was recmnded to discourage 24 square foot monument signs that are 8 feet high and only 3 feet wide, which would appear disproportionate. Ms. Rohrer ale~ felt that Option i should be increased to 8 fee~ high in order to allow space for architec~ural embellishments. Brad Bullet, City Planner, pointed to Bxhibit "D-l,' which illustrates how a 24 square foot monument sign could be horizontally oriented and still have 2 feet for architectural features. / C~xm~lssioner Melcher asked if the Sign Task Force discussed wall signs, Ms. Dempse~ replied that the Task Force had discussed wall signs but f~cueed on signs at the street as directed by City Council, She indicated a desire to Planning Commission Minutes -21- June 22, 1994 / .continue discussions with the Commission regarding other sign issues that would include wall signs. She commenned on the imPortance of signs as a marketing tool for small businesses. Dave Newsome, Lewis Homes Management Corp., indicated that the fermi1 trade has undergone major changes in the last decade. He stated that the trend today is for big box discount retailers in shopping centers. He felt that future shopping centers will feature fewer small tenants. Comraissioner McNiel felt that Option I was acceptable with the 6-foot height limit. Co~nissioner Lumpp asked what would prevent tenants from violating the ordinance under the either/or option. Ms. Dempsey stated that Lewis Homes Management Corp. would not automatically demolish existing monument signs in their shopping centers to take advantage of additional sign opportunities under the proposed ordinance. She said that if more than two monument signs are allowed per street frontage, then they may construct a second monument to provide more tenants the oppoz~cunity for identification at the street. Mr. Newsome commented that property owners could include a copy of the approved Uniform Sign Program for the shopping center in their leases ~e a means of notifying the tenants of their sign restrictions. Chairman Barker expressed his opposition to 8-foot high monument signs because they are not pedestrian in scale. Commissioner Melcher expressed concerns with allowing two monument signs per street. Ms. Dempsey felt that the minimum 300-foot spacing proposed by staff provides adequate separation between signs. Mr. Bullet indicated that staff simply needs Cam~lssion direc~ion ,in order to prepare an ordinance for consideration. Chairman Barker liked Options 1 and 2 with an either/or possibility. indicated that he prefers the horizontal sign format. He Commissioner Melcher felt that Option 1 is ~he best because it allows more tenants to be identified at the street. He thought an 8-foot height is too much for a 24 square foot monument sign. He said he would suppor~ an either/or possibility with Options i and 2. Chairman Barker noted that the City requires undulating blzms to screen parking areas which results in a greater apparent sign height. Commissioner Lumpp stated a preference for Option 11 h~e~.sr, he felt tlmt more signs will not increase business for tenants. Planning Cc.~ission Minutes -22- June 22, 1994 298 .Ms. Dampsay opposed the recommendation that major anchors be limited to 50 percent of the sign area. She preferred Options I and 2 with an either/or possibility. Commissioner McNiel felt that Option 2 should not be allowed for all shopping centers. He felt that smaller centers do not need a 48 square foot sign. He asked that criteria be developed for when Option 2 can be used. Commissioner Tolstoy preferred Option 1, but said he would entertain Option 2 if criteria were developed as suggested by Commissioner McNieZ. Chairman Barker asked the property owner representatives to submit reasonable criteria for application of OlYcion 2. In addition, he asked that the criteria address location of monument signs to protect views into the shopping centers. He requested that the proposed 300-foot spacing be reviewed for existing shopping centers to see if it is reasonable. Ms. Dampsay requested that no limit on the percentage of sign area devoted to major anchors be included in the ordinance. She felt that should be determined through review of Uniform Sign Programs. She cmnted that such limitation would not allow for creativity. Mr. Coleman indicated that the 50 percent limit on majors was lntende~ to preserve adequate sign spice for smaller tenants in response to the direr%ion given by City Council. He noted that absent such a limit, majors c~uld use the entire sign area. Commissioner Melcher supported the 50 percent limit on major anchors. Chairman Barker commented that the 50 percent limit seemed to address the needs of the small businesses. Coemissioner Melcher suggested that the City require the major anchor tenants to be identified on the sign and let the property owner de'cermine what other tenants Should have street signage, Connissioner Tolstoy indicated that staff should prepare language for the Coomission to consider. Chairman Barker cmnted that the 50 percent limit w~uld protec~ proper~y owners fr~e being pressured by major anchors. He requested that staff investigate alternative language that would allo~ sufficient area for ssmll tenants. It was the consensus of the Commission that staff provide an ordinance reflecting the C~maission's direction for consideration on July 27, 1994. · · · · · COMMISSION BUBINwSB L. DwSIGN pwVlwW COMMITTwW APPOIN~-NTS Planning Cosmission Minutes -23- June 22, 1994 DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT June 22j 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Brad Buller, City Planner Dan Coleman, Principal Planner SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of various amendments to the Sign Ordinance. BACKGROUND: On October 20, 1993, the City Council directed staff to work with the Planning Commission and small business owners on temporary sign issues (see Exhibit "A"). This action was taken in response to concerns raised by Mr. Glenn Crown, owner of Offroad Chicken, regarding signs within the Alta Loma Plaza shopping center on the southeast corner of 19th and Carnelian Streets. On October 28, 1993, Planning Commissioner Peter Tolstoy, Planning Division staff, and Chamber of Commerce representatives held a meeting with the tenants of the Alta Loma Plaza. The meeting was held at Offroad Chicken and artended by Mr. Crown, Mr. Sig Sliwoski (shopping center owner), and two tenants within the center. SIGN TASK FORCE: A Sign Task Force was assembled to address the sign needs of small business owners. This Task Force was comprised of Planning Commissioners Larry McNiel and Peter Tolstoy, Chamber of Commerce representatives, Planning Division staff, and Mr. Sliwoski, as well as representatives of the Lucky's shopping center and Lewis Homes Management Company (owner and manager of several shopping centers in the City). The Sign Task Force has met five times since last October. The Task Force reviewed the City's current Sign Ordinance regulations for tenant identification. A wide variety of permanent and temporary signs are presently allowed (see Exhibit "B"). The Task Force determined that the primary issue is the inability of many small businesses to get their name on the monument sign' along the street. The Sign Ordinance allows one monument sign per street frontage. Each monument sign can list the name of the center plus two tenants or identify three tenants. Therefore, a double-faced monument sign could provide identification for 4-6 tenants in a typical neighborhood shopping center which normally averages 14-20 tenants. MONUMENT SIGNS: Many ~ifferent options were discussed by the-Sign Task Force. Essentially, there are two choices that allow more tenants to have their name on a monument sign: either allow more monument signs or allow bigger. monument signs. Options which were reviewed by the Task Force are briefly described below and compared in the attached Exhibit "C-" PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SOA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 22, 1994 ,Page 2 OPTION 1: Double the number of monument signs allowed to two per street. OPTION 2: Double the monument sign area to 48 square feet. OPTION 3: Increase the monument sign area to 80 square feet. These options are illustrated in the attached Exhibit "D." Regardless of which option is selected, the Task Force recommended that the City adopt the following regulations: 1) limit major anchor identification to 50 percent of monument sign area to ensure adequate space for other tenants, and 2) adopt an 8-inch minimum letter height guideline to ensure legibility. TEMPORARY SIGNS: The use of temporary signs, such as banners or ground mounted signs, is an important means of advertising for many businesses· In evaluating the current regulations, the Task Force found that the allowable total display periods were, for the most part, adequate. Where they did find room for improvement was in providing flexibility in the use of these time periods by individual businesses and in identifying the need for new businesses to have additional advertising opportunities. It should be noted that no changes are being proposed to the allowable types of signs, sizes, colors, or locations. The following changes were recomended by the Task Force: Temporary Advertising Signs: Each business will continue to have the ability to display a temporary sign at their business location (on the building face or directly in front of their unit). In addition, shopping centers will also be allowed a temporary sign under these same criteria to advertise special events, promotions, or to showcase a new business. The recommended changes are as follows: Signs may be approved in periods of at least seven days for a total of up to nine times (weeks) per year (current code allows a 15-day minimum period for a total of four periods per year). A maximum of four periods may be approved consecutively to allow a single sign to be displayed for up to 28 days (current code allows a 30-day maximum by combining two 15-day periods). A minimum of two weeks shall be required between approved display periods (current policy requires one week between periods). The total number of days a sign may be displaye~ is 63 days per calendar year (increased from 60 days to correlate with the actual number of days in nine 7-day weeks)· 301 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SOA 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA June 22, 1994 .Page 3 Grand Opening Signs: New businesses have a particularly urgent need to identify themselves and their location. A temporary sign can be of use to alert potential customers even prior to opening for business. For these reasons, the allowable time periods for "Grand Opening" signs have been increased and the recommended changes are as follows: A "Grand Opening" sign may be displayed for a period of up to 90 days (increased from a total of 45 days permitted by current code). The display period is broken down to be used 30 days prior to the opening of the business and 60 days after opening. A sign of this type would be available only for a newly established business or a change of business name following a closure. An application for such a sign must be made either prior to opening or within the first 60 days of operation. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission select an option and give direction to staff to bring back the appropriate Ordinance. Respectfully submitted, City Planner BB:DC/jfs Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Minutes of October 20, 1993, City Council Meeting Exhibit "B" - Suaznary of Current Sign Regulations Exhibit "C" - Monument Sign Options Exhibit "D" - Illustrative Monument Sign Options City Council ,Minutes October 20, 1993 Page 5 uquet felt this should be continued until the first of the year, and not regulate at this time. Coun ~ber Gurietrez felt Marks deserved a chance and agreed with Councilmember Buquet. Councilmere asked if the City decides not to regulate, could they change their minds within the next 120 day period. Susan Mickey, Bill Marks stated if City to regulate when thi; forward with regulation. stated they could reapply to regulate. not in the middle of the Simmons deal, they would probably be asking the ,es up again. He stated for tonight, he would ask that the Council not go B~I Marks, Jr., reiterated to the RES< they can go back and regulate at any time. 93-189 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, REGULATION OF CABLE TELEVISION RELATED EQUIPMENT OF THE CITY OF RANCHO PERMITtING THI FOR BASIC SERVICE AND MOTION: Moved by Buquet, seconded by Willlares to continue the Resolution 93-189. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. tue to January 5, 1994 including Mayor Stout stated he is concerned about how the federal government handled this issue. _Hd the ?w does give the City the pleasure of totally regulating cable and that all the City can do is reg-ht-~e'~' rate not I. COUNCIl. RUglNRSS I1. R{:OUI:ST BY GT FNN CROV~N TO hISCUSS SIGNS IN Thq: A{ -TA T.OMA PI-,aTA SHOPPING CI:NT1:R ON TIll: SOLFr~.AST CORNI:R OF CARa'~ .IAN ~ 19Tl-I STS Mr. Glenn Crown, Off Road Chicken and BBQ, Carnelian and 19th Street, felt the Sign Ordinance was prejudicial to small business ownen. He continued to comment on the staff report and how he disagreed with it. He presented pictures to the Council and mentioned he did not like how the Code Enforcement Department handled his situation. Mr. Crown read comments from Mr. John Trimre, 9687 Base Line, which stated he felt sandwich board signs are the most effective meUNxl of advertising used by him. He felt he was losing money because of not being able to advertise appropriately. He felt the Council should open their eyes to small business and try to help them out Mr. Crown felt the Sign Ordinance should be looked at. He slated he is willing to sit on a committee to n'y to change the re4qfiationm. Mayor Stout stated the Sign Ordinance was developed because the people that spoke at the time it was developed did not want Rancho Cucamonga to look like Holt Blvd. Counc~memher Alexander staled he basically agreed with Mr. Crown that the City needs to do something to assist the business community, but that he did not feel it should look like Holt Bivd. City Council Minutes October 20, 1993 Page 6 Councilmember Buquet felt he should sit down with Brad Buller and talk through some of his issues. He sated he felt Mr. Crown has gotten sgme of the things he wanted when he acts reasonable with staff and does not threaten them. He stated he felt the City is willing to listen to suggested changes. Counciimember GuUerrez suggested that Mr. Crown work with the Planning Commission on some of his issues. He felt there could be a group get together to work on some of his concerns. Mayor Stout felt the Planning Commission and staff should look at some of the larger centers' signage also. He asked Mr. Markman to describe what the City can do legally. James Markman, City Attorney, stated staff would have to work on this and go before the Planning Commission and then back to the City Council. He felt this would take about 3 to 4 months. He felt Mr. Crown should work with the Planning Commission ,for some kind of temporary sign relief. Councilmember Williams felt when a shopping center paints their windows they are diminishing some of their security, and she also indicated she did not like all the paint on the windows. Mayor Stout and Councilmember Buquet suggested that Brad Bullet work with the Planning Commission and small business owners on temporan/sipage issues that are occurring right now. Councilmember Buquet felt Brad Buller should work with the people in this particular center first to discuss their issues. Councilmember Gutierrez suggested Brad Buller work with the Code Enforcement Division on how they deal with problems and the general public as far as professionalism towards customen. MOTION: Moved by Stout, seconded by Buquet for Planning staff to work with the Planning Commission and small business owners on temporary signage issues. Motion earned 4-1 (Alexander no). Councilmember Alexander stated he felt the rest of the people that wanted to speak on this issue should be given the chance to do so. Mayor Stout called a recess at 9:22 p.m. The meeting was called back to order at 9:33 p.m. with all Councilmembers present. Sigmond Solowski, owner of the A!ta Loma Plaza, asked that there be a correction made in the staff report in paragraph 1 where it discusses 4 monument sips, and stated he did not agree with how this was written. He stated it took him over one year to change signs to get what he has now. He stated he is not here only on Mr. Crown's behalf, but for the other tenants also. He stated he would be happy to work with Mr. Crown and City staff on the issues brought up. He stated he would take pictures of Tustin Avenue in Orange County to be discussed at the meetings. Mayor Stout asked him to take the pictures on the street as it goes from City to City. Councilmember Wi!liams stated she did not feel the windows should be painted all over them. Mr. Solowski commented on the vacancy rate in commercial areas in Rancho Cucamonga. 304 City Council Minutes October 20, 1993 Page 7 J1. about d~e No communications were made Mayor Stout stated the best marketing tool for a shopping center is public safety. Councilmember Buquet asked him what his vacancy rote is. ,Mr. Solowski stated "0". Councilmember Buquet slated he would like to get Mr. Solowski's input regarding this issue. Brad Bullet, City Planner, stated he has worked with Mr. Crown and the other tenants with regards to their signs and felt there was flexibility in the Sign Ordinance to possibly assist them. Councilmember Buquet asked if there was a way to deal with this that would not be a long drawn out process. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated he felt there would be a way to deal with it fairly quickly. .!. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Buquet stated he would like to talk about his fight sizing item when the Council talks in November. COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PURI,IC the public. MOTION: Moved by Alexander, seconded by matters. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0, The ADJOURNMENT uet to adjourn to an Executive Session to discuss personnel adjourned at 9:49 p,m. 'Debra J. Adam~ CMC City Clerk Approved: November 17, 1993 305 Current Sign Regulations Element Purpose Max. Number Spacing SIgn Area Height WIdth ~"'~Letter Height Content ~Color Monument Tenant Identificalion One per street frontage One per street frontage 24 square feet 8 feet (incl. design elements) No maximum No restriction Either name of center plus 2 tenants or 3 tenants as determined by owner. No restriction No restriction Wail Business Pedestrian DIrectory Traffic SIgn Tenant Identification One per building face Max. 3 per business 10% of building face, not to exceed 150 s.f. Below roof or 20 feet, whichever is less. No maximum No restriction Tenant name & logo No restridion No restriction Tenant Identification Min. 60 feet setback from street curb. 15 square feet 6 feet No maximum No restriction Tenant name and address No restriction No restriction Tenant Identification (wall, window or under canopy). One per business Not applicable 6 square feet 12 feet No maximum No restriction Tenant name and address No restriction No restriction Temporary SIgns Advertize special events (i.e., grand openings, etc.). Includes wall, window or ground signs, and use of flags, banners and pennants. One per activity Display max. 45 days per year 50 square feet Below roof or 8 feet. No maximum No restriction No restriction No restriction No restriction Monument Signs Element Purpose Max. Number Spacing Sign Area Height Current City of Rancho Cucamonga Tenant Identification One per street frontage One per streel frontage 24 square feet 8 feet (incl, design elements) Option I Tenant Identification Two per street frontage Min. 300 feel apart 24 square feet 6 feet (ind. design elements) Option 2 Tenant Identificalion One per street frontage One per streel frontage 48 square feet 8 feel (ind. design elements) Optio~ 3 Tenant Identification One per street frontage One per streel frontage 80 square feet 8 feet (plus 3 feet for design elements) Width Letler Height Content Color Logo No maximum No restriction Either name of center plus 2 tenants or 3 fenants No restriction No restriction No maximum Recommend 8' rain. Tenant i.d. as delermined by center owner. Major anchors limited to 5(:Wo of sign area. No restriction No restriction No maximum Recommend 8" rain. Tenant i.d. as determined by center owner. Major anchors limited to 50% of sign area. No restriction No restriction No maximum Recommend 8" inch min. Tenant i.d. as determined by center owner. Major anchors limited to 50% of sign area. No restriction No reslriction H I,.TKI-MN 1 AISCDE::F . ,<-: V -I 5( V on H IJ K -/ /0/o// MONUMENT SIGN SURVEY signsurvey CITY MAXIMUM MAXIMUM SIGN SIGN HEIGHT AREA RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8 ft. 24 sq. ft. COSTA MESA DANA POINT FONTANA OR Pylon Sign FOUNTAIN VALLEY IRVINE LA VERNE MISSION VIEJO MORENO VALLEY OR Pylon Sign if 25 acres MONTCLAIR Frontage of T5 feet or less Frontage of 76-200 feet Frontage over 201 feet ONTARIO Centers under 3 acres Centers over 3 acres UPLAND Centers of 5 acres or less Centers of more than 5 acres OR 2 signs 25 ft. 125 sq. ft. 20 ft. 100 sq. ft. 6 ft. 30 sq. ft. 25 ft. 100 sq. ft. 8 ft. 50 sq. ft. 6 ft. 50 sq. 9 ft. 90 sq. ft. 6 ft. 36 sq. ft. 6 ft. 40 sq. ft. 45 ft. 150 sq. ft. 6 ft. 24 sq. ft. 8 ft. 48 sq. ft. 10 ft. 60 sq. ft. 7 ft. 50 sq. ft. 20 ft. 100 sq. ft. 12 ft. 16 ft. 8 ft. 100 sq. ft. 100 sq. ft. 60 sq. ft. Source: Surveys conducted by Planning Division, Lewis Homes Management Corp. and Diversified Properties Co. 311 TZT? OF RANCHO CUTAMCNGA snc~s :rve? SHOPPING CENTER MONUMENT SURVEY CENTER STREET FRONTAGE MONUMENT LENGTH HEIGHT 1Albertson's Base Line Archibald 2 Alpha Beta Center Base Line Archibald 3 Alta Loma Country VillageBase Line (Stater Bros.) 4 Atta Loma Plaza (Alpha Beta) 5 Alta Loma Square (Vons) 6 Arrow Plaza 7 Base Line Village (Taco Bell) 8 Central Park Plaza (Ralph's) 9 Charley Plaza 10 Deer Creek Village 11 Foothill Village (Chuck E' Cheese) 12 Haven Village (Lucky's) 13 KMart Center 14 Miller's Outpost Center 15 Music + Plaza 16 Perry's Center 17 Plaza de las Brisas (Roger Dunn Golf) 18 Rancho Cucamonga Center 19 Rancho Cucamonga Plaza 20 Rancho Plaza 21Rancho Square 22 Rancho Towns Center (Smarts) Carnelian 19th Carnelian 19th Carnelian Arrow Route Malvern Base Line Archibald Base Line Millikan Ellann West Tetra Vista Parkway Haven Lemon (SWC) Haven (Brunswick) Foothill Hellman Helms Haven Lemon Haven Arrow Route Foothill Archibald Foothill Lion Foothill Helms Malachite Hampshire Foothill Ramona Foothill 19th (SWC) Carnelian 19th {NWC) Carnelian Foothill Foothill San BernardIns 29 Thomas WInery 30 Turner Plaza 31 Victoria Village 32 Vineyards Marketplace (Albertsons) 23 Rancho Cucamonga Village Foothill (Wherehouse) Ramona (NEC) 24 Rancho Terrace Foothill 25 Stater 8ros. Center 19th (NEC) Archibald 26 Stop N' Go Center Base Line Archibald 27 Sunrtze Shopping Center Base Line Carnelian 28 Terra VIsta VIllage Base Line (Hughes) Haven Valencta Foothill Vineyard San Bernardins Hermosa Arrow Route Base Line Victoria Park Lane Unnamed cul-de-sac Mllllken Highland Kenyon Way Woodruff Place 665 7'9" 660 595 410 708 480 483 5'4" 690 500 5'6" 590 260 5'3" 215 140 190 900 8'6" 750 850 600 290 660 1100 8'0" 630 5'4" 600 600 840 6'0" 480 1230 4'0" 630 340 7'6" 630 387 6'0" 390 730 6'8" 280 280 610 550 6'0" 260 184 None 330 6'0" 315 273 7'5" 550 146 4'9" 868 8'0" 901 632 7'3" 278 347 6'6" 620 6'0" 560 545 6'0" 750 670 ZgO 840 8'6" 650 1450 550 5'7" 750 550 300 3'9"o 300 950 8'0" 750 410 600 5'6" 980 800 800 33 Wendy's Plaza Foothill 185 8'O',Z~~~tlllm~t II .....................::h.'.-' ;::iiiii ............ lnlmum Frontage 140 Lewis Homes Management Corp. 1156 North Mountain Avenue / P.O. Box 670 / Upland. California 91785-0670 909/985-0971 FAX: 909/949-6700 Mr. Dan Coleman City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 July 14, 1994 RE: Sign Ordinance Amendment 94-01 Dear Dan: In response to our conversations I would like to offer the following comments regarding the proposed sign ordinance amendment: 1. A third option of maintaining the current monument ordinance (24 square foot sign area and 8 feet high) should be added to the proposal. This provides landlords that don't wish to develop a program identifying minor tenants on the project monumentation an option. As you know, I have discussed this with Planning Commission Chairman Dave Barker and he didn't have any problem with this concept. 2. The other two "new" options would be for property owners that want to develop a monument sign program that incorporates minor tenants. If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me at 909-946-7585. Paul~ Dempsey ~~C,'~~ Senior Commercial Marketing Manager Lewis Homes Management Corp. C# "RECEIVED., TY ~LRANCMO CUCAMONGA Commissioner Lumpp preferr that a solid metal or wood gate be used in place of the proposed chain link g e with redwood slats. Commissioners Melcher and McNie agreed that a metal gate should be required. Motion:' Moved by Tolstoy, sec ded by McNiel, to adopt the resolution approving Conditional Use Permit 9 -16 with modification to require a metal gate and the i~stallation of street ~rees. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMP MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE G. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of various amendments to the Sign Ordinance. Dan Coleman, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker questioned the current maximum size of monument signs. Mr. Coleman responded that currently one sign per street frontage is permitted and it can be a maximum of 24 square feet, 8 feet tall. Chairman Barker said he read the proposal that there will be three choices: 1) The status quo of one sign per street frontage up to 24 square feet, 8 feet tall; 2) Two signs per street frontage up to 24 square feet each, 6 feet tall; or 3) One sign per street frontage up to 48 square feet, 8 feet tall. Mr. Coleman responded that was correct. He said it was felt that the status quo should be kept because some centers may not wish to have additional signs or modify their sign program. Commissioner Melcher stated the language gives the developer a great deal of flexibility so far as identification of tenants. He assumed there would still be an approval process so that a sign would not have a lot of small writing in an attempt to identify every tenant in a center. Mr. Coleman said staff would still have to approve the signs. He noted that there is a minimum 8-inch letter height. Chairman Barker opened the public hearing. Paula Dempsey, Lewis Homes Management Corp., P. O. Box 670, Upland, stated she had requested that the status quo remain not only for those centers which have already been developed, but also to give developers of new centers that option if they wish to name 0nly their key anchors. She noted that if there is a program to identify the smaller tenants, the fairness issue enters into the picture and the shopping center operators must make a conscious decision as to what the parameters will be. She said that would take the burden off the City and place it on the property owner. Planning Commission Minutes -22- July 27, 1994 Commissioner Lumpp felt property owners should take more responsibility for ~uch things as sandwich board signs which are placed out because smaller tenants claim they cannot stay in business because of a lack of signage. Me felt that leases should include such provisions. Ms. Dempsey felt that most standard lease forms include such a provision, but the enforcement becomes difficult because the signs appear overnight. She said that Lewi~ Homes definitely tries to stay on top of it because when one tenant places such a sign out, the others want to follow suit. Commissioner Lumpp asked how the City could be assured that other shopping center owners would also enforce the provision. Ms. Dempsey said she could not respond. She noted that the task force had been formed at the request of the City Council to look at ways to better identify small tenants at the street. She felt a compromise position had been reached. Chairman Barker felt the representatives from the private sector and the Chamber of Commerce contributed a great deal to the task force. Ms. Dempsey felt it had been a very proactive effort. She hoped there would be some continuation so that other areas of concern in the sign ordinance could be addressed in the same positive fashion. Commissioner McNiel stated he had been on the task force. He felt there had been exceptional people from the private sector and there was great cooperation. Me said it had been a pleasant experience to work on the task force. He felt that his ultra-conservative position was supported from the private sector on certain issues. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he had also artended several of the meetings. Me felt the City maintained its sign integrity and the development community was given what they wanted. Me supported the amendment. Commissioner Lumpp supported the recommendations. He hoped it would help put an end to signage concerns raised by the small business people. Commissioner Melcher supported the proposed amendment as amended. Commissioner McNiel asked if there are currently any 8-foot high signs in the community. Mr. Coleman responded that there are currently six signs shown on the survey which are 8 feet or taller. Commissioner Melcher felt that height is relative to the setting,- Commissioner McNiel stated he was concerned because the proposed maximum of 48 square feet up to 8 feet tall would be a large sign which could be overwhelming based on the setting. He said he was not opposed to the status quo or the second option with two signs per street frontage, a minimum of 200 Planning Commission Minutes -23- July 27, 1994 315 feet apart, with a maximum of 6 feet in height. He felt such signs would · still be in a human scale. He felt a 48 square foot, 8 foot tall sign could appear as a wall depending on the setting. Commissioner Tolstoy stated that the City requires a sign program and he felt it would be possible to look at any proposed 8-foot sign in its setting and determine if it would be obtrusive. Chairman Barker reopened the public hearing. Ms. Dempsey stated that the 48 square foot sign was introduced to permit allocation of space for small tenant identification. She said it was figured 8 to 10 small tenant names could be placed on a 48 square foot sign using the minimum 8-inch letter. She hoped the option would be left in so that developers would have an option. She said that some centers may want to rotate smaller tenant names on the signs, and a 24 square foot sign would not allow that to happen. Commissioner McNiel asked if it needed to be 8 feet tall. Ms. Dempsey felt that it did. She said they had wanted a lO-foot height and 8 feet was a compromise. Chairman Barker again closed the public hearing. Commissioner Melcher felt that design review or staff review of sign programs would show where the area of the sign appears excessive and modifications could be requested. He thought the area provisions are appropriate for this community. Motion: Moved by Tolstoy, seconded by Melcher, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Sign Ordinance Amendment 94-01. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY MCNIEL NONE -carried Commissioner McNiel stated he had voted no because of the 8-foot height on the 48 square foot sign. Commissioner Tolstoy stated he had traveled on Foothill Boulevard in La Verne and he could not read their signs because they have small letters and are high in an attempt to list every tenant of every center. Chairman Barker agreed that placing a lot of names on a sign, makes it hard to read. Motion: Moved by McNiel, seconded ~yl:~y, carried 4-1 with Melcher voting no, to continue the meeting beyond ~ Planning Commission Minutes -24- July 27, 1994 316 RESOLUTION NO. 94-7i A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT NO. 94-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, on the 22nd day of June and continued to the 27th day of July 1994, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing pursuant to Section 65864 of the California Government Code. SECTION 1: following findings: The Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission has made the 1. That the Amendment will provide for development of a comprehensively planned urban community within the District that is superior to development otherwise allowable under alternate regulations; and 2. That the Amendment will provide for development within the District in a manner consistent with the General Plan and with related development and growth management policies of the City. SECTION 2: The Commission finds and determines that the project identified above in this Resolution is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment 94-01 to modify the Municipal Code per the attached Ordinance. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TM DAY OF JULY 1994. PLANN G ,ISSION~OF T~EJTY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: E · 'v~id~' -ke,~Ch : Br/~a ler ATTEST: I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Cpmmission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Comission held on the 27th day of July 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01, AMENDING TITLE 14 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE. A. Recitals (i) On June 22, and continued to July 27, 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing with respect to the above-referenced Sign Ordinance Amendment. Following the conclusion of said public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 94-01, thereby recommending that the City Council adopt Sign Ordinance Amendment No. 94-01- (ii) On September 7, 1994, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing and concluded said hearing prior to its adoption of this ordinance. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Section 14.20,100, Subsection 2. Business identification (businesses within shopping centers), is hereby amended to read, in words and figures, as shown in the attached Exhibit "A." SECTION 2: Section 14.16,022 is hereby added to Chapter 14.16 to read as follows: 14-16.022 ?raffic hazards. All elenm and sign structures shall be subject ~o the follo~Jag: leo sign or sign structure shall be erected at the intersection of any street or at any driveway access to · street in a way that obstructs free and clear visioa of pedestrians and vehicular traffic; No sign or sign structure shall be erected at any location where, b~ teasin of the position, shape, illumination, or color, it may interTare with, obstruct the view of, or be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or device; and 818 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 September 7, 1994 Page 2 No sign or sign structure shall be erectel that makes the use of the werds "STOP," =LOOK, · "DANGER," or say other word, phrase, s~mbol, or character in such a manner as to interfere with, mislead, or confuse traffic. SECTION 3: Section 14-16.023 is hereby added to Chapter 14.16 to read as follows: 14-16.023 Illuminated sign nuisances. Signs illuminated internally or externally shall be located or shielded so as to prevent any glare from the ~,lh, tubes, or other illumination devices from falling u~m adjacent property or street rights-of- SECTION 4: Section 14.16.020.M. is hereby added to Chapter 14.16 to read as follows: Obscene SECTION 5: Section 14.04.010, Subsection A, of Chapter 14.04 is hereby amended to read as follows: 14-04.010 Declaration of need. A. The city recognizes the need for signs as a means to a~vertise and identify businesses within the community. The city finds that signing is an important design element of the physical environment. Provisions consistent with the goals and objectives of the co~nunity are necessary to ensure that the special character and image the community is striving for can be attained while serving business needs in the community. The city is striving to provide an economically stable and visually attractive community through high quality site planning, building designs, landscaping, and signing. As a planned architectural feature, a sign can be pleasing and can harmonize with the physical character of its environment. Proper controls can achieve this goal and will make the city a more attractive place to live, work, and shop. SECTION 6: Section 14.08.210 of Chapter 14.08 is hereby amended to read as follows: - 14.08.210 Monument sign. "Monument sign" means a free-standing sign ~f Z~ ~M~M ~M~ f~ ~M M~8~/ incorporating the design and building materials accenting the architectural theme of the buildings on the same property. 319 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 September 7, 1994 Page 3 SECTION 7: Section 14-08,331 is hereby added to Chapter 14.08 to read as follows: 14-08.331 Sipn structure. 'Sign structure" means a Structure of any kind, including supports, ~rpri~hts, base, guys, anchors, bracing, framework, and any decoration of the sign upon which a sign is placed or erected. SECTION 8: as follows: Section 14.24.070 of Chapter 14.24 is hereby amended to read 14.24.070 Illumination and motion. Monument signs shall be nonmoving stationary structures (in all components) and illumination, if any, shall be maintained by artificial light which is stationary and constant in intensity and color at all times (nonflashing). Internal illumination is preferred~ if external ill,~-i~ation is used, concealed or decorative fixtures shall be used. SECTION 9: as follows: Section 14.20,040 of Chapter 14.20 is hereby amended to read 14.20,040 Special event signs. Special event signs may be approved for a limited period of time in any zoning district as a means of publicizing special events such as ~M~ ~MZM~/carnivals, festivals, charitable events, and Christmas tree lots, ~M~ fXf~W~f~ ~Md~ in ~omjunction with a Temporary Use Permit. To apply for approval of special event business or propert7 o~ner ~st sulmit an application with the city plann~in9 division which describes the proposed sign by means of a sketch and the display dates for review and approval. TM~ ~X~ ~4XfX~X~M~/~f ~M~ ~M~ f~/ Such special event signs shall be limited to the following provisions: No more than one special event sign shall be permitted per activity and shall be either a wall, window, or ground sign, and use of frags, banners, and pennants. All special event signs shall be a maximum of fifty square feet and shall be posted below the roof or shall be no higher than eight feet in the case of a ground sign. 320 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 September 7, 1994 Page 4 Special event signs shall be limited to forty- five days per calendar year. SECTION 10: Section 14-20.041 of Chapter 14.20 is hereby amended to read as follows: 14-20.041 ~t~M~X ~X~ Temporary advertising signs. A ~t~X~MIZ ~Z~ temporaz7 a~verttsing sign ~y be approved for a tenordry period of time, as specified in ~is section, for ~ercial ~d industrial uses. The si~s ~y ~ used to promote the sale of new products, mw ~t, new management, new hours of operation, a new service, or to pro~te a special sale. MY b~iness ~ Pm~y ~r desiring to ~e a ~f~X~M~Z ~X~ ~~ a~s~g si~ m~t file ~ application and ~awing or photograph with ~e city planning division for review and approval. The use of such si~s is subject to ~e following li~tations: No more than one sign shall be permitted per activity or business. The sign shall be a temporary sign designed either as a wall sign, window sign, or ground sign. The sign can be in the form of a banner or pennant. The sign shall not exceed fifty square feet and shall be posted below the roof. In the case of a ground sign, the height of the sign shall not exceed eight feet. ~/ b sign -haL1. be I/mired to a dimplay period of at lent seven daya. Nine ouch periods ehalX be permitted for each calendar year, not to -~eed a total of 63 daym per year, A --4 of four periods my be a~pzoved ~onmecut~vely ~o allow a single sign t~ be displayed for up ~o 28 days; otherelse, a mtntmm of t~o eeekm shall be required between · tspLsy periods. 321 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. SIGN ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 September 7, 1994 Page 5 SECTION 11: as follows: Section 14.20.045 is hereby added to Chapter 14.20 to read 14.20.045 Grand opening signs. A grand openin9 ~ign may be approved for a temporary period of time in any zaning district to advertise a new business or a change of business name following a closure. Any business or property ov~er desiring to use a grand op~ntng sipn mist file an application together with a drawing or photograph to the city's plan~lng division for review and approval. An application must be made either prior to opening or within the first 60 days of operation. The use of such signs is subject to the following limitations: No more than me sipn shall be permitted per grand opening. The sign shall be a temporary sign designed either as a wall, window, or ground sign. The sign can be in the form of a banner or p~n-a~t. The sign shall not exceed 50 square feet and shall be poeted below the roof. In the case of a ground sign, the height of the sign shall not exceed 8 feet. The sign 8hall be limited to a display period not to exceed 30 days prior to opening and 60 days after op~ni-g, for a total display period of 90 dayS- SECTION 12: This Council finds and determines that the project identified above in this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. SECTION 13: The Mayor shall sign this Ordinance and the City Clerk shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its passage at least once in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Ontario, California, and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. 14.20. 100 Permitted Siqmme -- Corn metcast and Office Zones. The foll~vinq signs may be peraLlied In the cam marcia1 and office z<~nes subbed CLASS SIGN 14 A XI14U 14 84 A XI14U 14 N A XlNU N TYPE NU14BER S/GN AREA HEIGHt' R.sinemm Mall One per building 10 % of the building Not to project above ldentj/icaelon face, a maidmum of face, not to exceed the roof and in no Ibimneme not witYdn three per bulLam 150 iquage feet came be higher than 20 feet fro · shopping centers finished c/reds including tingle tenant office ~ buildingel urneat One per street 24 square feet Up to 8 feet firouts9e, a maidmum Of 2 Der bulLare enmlneee IdentUication (bullsease within shopping centers) Man One per Ixdldin9 IO a of the building Not to project above faces I laid mum of faces not to exceed the roof and in no ) for any oee 150 equate feet came be higher than 20 feet ero · IlumlnmmI~dmhed gge4e. REMARKS s. A combination of monnment "end wall etgna may be used/ however, only a maidmum nf three idcpme may be used to i4entLfy any one business- b, Mall signs and monument sicJoe shall be m~cldtertually deSIgned to be compatible with the development- c, 14onuseat signs shall be placed entirely on the sublect property and shall not overhang into private or public propetty, A combination of monument and wall sicjoe may be umedl however, only a maidmum of 3 signs may be used to Identify may one bumlass MIll signs are ilmited to business idwntUtcation only. A center ls one in which buminemeel an,t tructxuem are designed in an inteqrared and interrelated development- Su~-h design ls Independent of the number ,~t structures, lots, or parcels making up the Center, All shopping centers shall devehq> m coordinated sign program for all tenants end times. .This includes size, color, st,p, type, and locaLton. Limited variation IH permitted, much es color, ms l~nq as the remaining components of the proqTam remain the same, 14.20.100 Permitted Signs -- COB merCJAl and Office Zones. The loLlDiShed dcJnl lay be permitted Ln the con mercia] and office z~nea 8uh)e~t t,~ the I~g,~vls,~ma5 CLASS 83GN MAilHUM MAllHUN MAXIMUM TYPE NUMBSR m'GN AREA HKEGH? HEMARKS Monument id~ne may contain up to three ldentLficeUoa per ddel either the the Be name ~ ~e center I~d tvo tenanM ~ee tenln~ ?he ~; (color, aate~ ~y~) of ~ monument ~ N count ana com~le to the bd~ of ~e center. Monument N~g ~ferent mea need n~ cont~n i~nUc~ ~msU~. Ad~Uona~y, a two d~d d~ ~ed n~ con~ ~e nee copy. b. A. ~ i~ck m,i.im~ !e~er ke~f i~ vecemmeKaeJ. ,3 DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Diane O'Neal, Management Analyst II CONSIDERATION OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL REFUSE RATE REVIEW RECOMMENDATION The City Council approve the attached Refuse Rate Resolution adjusting the maximum residential rate for refuse collection from $19.05 to $19.30 per month and a corresponding 1.3% adjustment for commercial/industrial rates effective September 7, 1994. Backl~round The County of San Bemardino continues to experience increases in operating and maintenance costs for the landfills in San Bemardino County. These increases are due to shrinking landfill capacity, increasing Federal and State mandated costs for closures, and escalating environmental protection costs. These increased costs have caused the County to increase the dump or tipping fee from $34.50 to $35.50 a ton. Analysis The dump or tipping fee is calculated by the County of San Bernardino's Auditor/Controller's office and represents a pass through cost to our residents. These calculations are based on the County's costs for regulatory waste, water, and air mandates associated with the operation and maintenance of the landfills. In addition, the County incurs closure costs for all San Bernardino County landfills. The County Board of Supervisors approved the dump or tipping fee increase effective July 1, 1994. The City's refuse rates were last adjusted July 1, 1992 and the recommended new rates integrate the County's dump or tipping fee increase. Refimse Service The City's refuse haulers, Rancho Disposal, Yukon Disposal, and Western Waste Industries continue to provide exemplary service to the residents and commercial/industrial community. The City continues to keep a service log of complaints received from residents and/or business; the City has received no complaints for the past two-year period. As a reminder for the Council, the haulers pick up refuse for approximately 34,000 residential homes and just under 1,000 commercial/industrial accounts. Residents have always been able to place as much refuse curbside as they wish and this service will not change. 325 Refuse Rate Review September 7, 1994 Page Two Fntnre Aajnstment Considerations The dump or tipping fee rate is set and adopted by the County Board of Supervisors. It is anticipated that the landfill operations and maintenance costs will continue to escalate. Staff will continue to work closely with the refuse haulers in negotiating rates that are fair and equitable for any future adjustments. "Res ec ully.. Su ' ed, 326 A RESOLU~CI~ OF ~IE CITY ~ OF ~ CITY OF RAKH:) ~~ C~T.~Rq~, SEI'r'~GPja'ESK~RRESID]~VI'D~AND Mf~REAS, the City C~uncil o~ the City oE Rancho O~..-.~ja re~ that effective J~ly 1, 1994 the ~ of Safi BerPaxdi~o irlxBased the tcalrklge fees for refuse collectira, and M{BREAS, the City Council of the City of Rand~ O~a,.~ h~- det~m{n~a_ that it is r~c~f for the efficient c~eraticn ard m~~ of Rancilo O~J~,,~uea that the maximan rates be adjusted. NCM, ~CeE, the City Council of the City of Rancho hereb~ resolve that the rates listed below becrem effective Se~ 7, 1994: 1. Maw~ m?qthly rate $17.30 per service. Max~mM malthly rate differential for service north of BanTan Street $0.70 per service. 3. Maximan mcsYchly rate for senior citizen $10.90. Senior citizen mhall be anyam sixty-~o (62) years old, head of household, and have a request with l~rmittae. Maxjam mmthly rate shall be $17.30 for the first unit and $16.30 for each unit thereafter. 2 .Ma~ mcr~lly rate differen~i~l for service rrrth of amman street $0.70 p~ ~rvice. ~at~ple ~~ unit rote ~cil/z~ um~ (3) a~i= y~ Ma~n m~lhly rate shall be as follows-in Lv~t~t to fTquenc7 of ~ce (reidential aui ap~t~ him). a. crs service weekly $ 102.10 b. Two services weekly 157.70 c. ~ree services weekly 213.30 d. Four services weekly 268.90 e.Five services weekly 324.75 f. Six services weekly 379.52 327 De TeL~y ~e~ice (l~ t~n thirty (30) days). 1. Thr~ (3) ~ic yard ~x~aine~: Maximum rate of $82.80 for seven (7) days at locatim. Maxim~ rate of $50.75 for each additi~ml service 2. Roll-off cuntainer up to maximan forty (40) cubic yards. a. Maximan rate of $397.50 per service (d~), however, cuntainer shall be serviced (~mTed) at least crrm every M (7) days. 1. Basic L-~ividual Residential unit rate utilizin~ cur~ a. Maxizum mmthly rate $2. O0 per service. Multiple Residential Unit rate utilizin~ curb service a. Maximm monthly rate $1.50 per service. SP%"[/C~ 2: Charges for Service - O~L~-rc~]/Irrlustr~l. 1/2) cubic yard refuse ccr~a/ne~s. frequency of service: a. em Mrvice ~kly $ 84.55 $ 126.82 b. T~D service. weekly 123.95 185.90 c. ~'xree servi(~s weekly 162.55 243.80 FrmUdYratesinme~e~to~eha]/notbelessthan eighty-five pe~ (85%) of the stated mindram rate. a. One ser'vioe ~selcl. y $ 94.45 $ 141.65 b. ~ services ~ee. kly 2.42,95 214.40 c. ~ ~~ ~y ~. 70 287.55 and r. raustrial rat~ utiliz~ U=~e (3) cubic yard refuseconUdners. .. Maximan ~_~Td:hly rate shall be as follows in ~vM.e.~. to frequency of service: a. one service weekly $ 113.45 $ 170.15 b. Two services ~jekly 174.00 261.00 c. 3hree services weekly 235.10 352.65 d. Four services %eekly 295.85 443.75 e. Five services ~Bekly 356.55 534.80 f. Six services weekly 417.80 626.70 Monthly rates in respect to frequency shall r~c be less than eighty-five (85%) of the stated maxim~ rate, and n-austrial rate utilizim/four (4) cubic yarU refusecunUdners. .. l~aximm ~-athly rate shall be as follc~ws in ~B~.e~. to fTetuer~ of service: a. erie service weekly $ 132.20 $ 198,45 b. TWo services weekly 208.45 312,65 c. ~lree services weekly 284.50 426.75 d. Four services weekly 360.50 540.75 e. Five services weekly 436.50 654.75 f. Six services ~eekly 512.57 768.85 Ma~thly rates in ~e~e,.~ to frequency shall not be lees than eighty-five lmrcent (85%) of the stated mav~m~ rate. Maximan mcrtthly rate shall be as follo~ in ~~. to fTetuer~ of service: 329 a. One service weekly b. Two services weekly c. Three services weekly' d. Four services weekly e. Five services weekly f. Six services weekly $ 157.10 $ 233.00 263.20 389.75 369.30 546.55 475.65 703.10 581.75 859.90 687.80 1016.95 Mmthly rates in respect to frequerEy shall not be less than eighty-five percent (85%) of the stated mxiz,m rate. (ccan~a~ t~hlance~ lid), utilizing three (3) c~bic ~ ~ Ma~{m~ monthly rate shall be as foll~,B in IB~x~ to frequency of service: a. Tw~services~--..~.kly $ 198.85 $ 257.60 b. ~Eeeservicesweekly 259.55 348.05 c. Four serviceeweekly 319.65 438.50 d. Fives err ices weekly 380.05 529.20 e. Six serviceeweekly 440.50 619.65 Mmthly rates in I~. to frequency shall not be less than eighty-five ~e~x~e,t (85%) of the stated maximm rate. ~oll-off ccmta/ner up to ..~w/mm fcrt-y (40) cubic yards. Un~cw,p..~ce~ emmcte~ a. Per service (duap) $ 419.1o $ 628.65 cuYcainer shaUl be serviced (a~ped) at least fc,= (4) thins per Rate in respe~ to frequency shall not be less than eighty- five percent (85%) of the stated maxinmJm rate. 3. Roll-off ccalta~ up to maxilium forty (40) c~bic yards. Maxi~n rate of $419.10 per service (dump); however, container shall be serviced (d~n.ped) at least cede every seven (7) days. Rate in respect to frequency shall not be less than eighty-five percent (s~) of the ~ated maxim~ rate. DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 7, 1994 STAFF REPORT Nayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Brad Buller, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - OAS - The consideration of a request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan by adding Commercial Recreation as a permitted use in the Specialty Commercial District in Subareas 1 and 2- !~COM~DATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed amendment through the adoption of the attached resolution. On August 10, 1994, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed amendment and recommended approval since it is in keeping with the goals of streamlining the City's regulations. Based on recent Code amendments, Indoor Commercial Recreation is now a permitted use in Subarea 3- Therefore, staff recommends adding Indoor Commercial as a permitted use in Subareas 1 and 2- Attached is the Commission's staff report which gives a detailed description and analysis of the proposed amendment. ir~~ e~, Ci~ Planner BB:NF:sp Attachments: Exhibit ."l" - August 10, 1994 Commission report' Exhibit "2" - Planning Resolution No. 94-74 Exhibit "3" - August 10, 1994 Planning Commission Minutes Resolution of Approval DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT August 10, 1994 Chairman and Members of the Planning Con~nission Bra~ Bull.r, City Planner Nancy Fong, AICP, Senior Planner FOOTMILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - OAS - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan by adding Con~nercial Recreation as a conditionally permitted use in the Specialty Connercial District in Subareas 1 and 2. BACKGROUND: At it's meeting on June 22, 1994, after considering the applicant's request to add the Comercial Recreation use to the Specialty Co~nercial District, the Commission directed the applicant to proceed with the amendment application. Attached to this report is a copy of the minutes from June 22, 1994. ANALYSIS: Proposed Amendment: The primary consideration is whether the Commercial Recreation land use category is appropriate for the Specialty Commercial District. The Development Code defines Commercial Recreation as "a use providing recreation, amusement, or entertainment services, including indoor, such as theaters, bowling lanes, billlard parlors, skating arenas, and similar services, and outdoor uses such as golf, tennis, basketball, baseball, and similar services, operated on a private or for profit basis" (Sec. 17.02.140). However, the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan identifies Theaters as a distinct land use category separate from Con~nercial Recreation. Page II-6.2 (see Exhibit "C") of the Specific Plan states that Specialty Commercial is intended to accommodate specialty uses unique to a particular subarea. The applicant desires to open a billiards and sports club within the Thomas Winery Plaza (see Exhibit "B"). Staff believes that the concept of allowing a mix of commercial and indoor recreation uses has merit. Adding this land use category to the Specialty Commercial district would allow the opportunity to create such a unique center, furthering the intent of the land use district. A review of the Specific Plan shows that Subareas 1, 2, and 3, as shown in Exhibit "D," have locations designated for Speci.alty Comercial Districts. Based on recent code amendments to streamline the planning process, Indoor Con~nercial Recreation is now a permitted use in Subarea 3. Therefore, staff recommends adding Indoor Commercial Recreation as a Permitted use in Subareas 1 and 2. PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FBSPA 94-02 - OAS INVESTORS August 10, 1994 Page 2 Be Environmental Assessment: The proposed amendment of adding Commercial Recreation land use to the Specific Plan is not subject to environmental assessment as staff determined that it is not a "project" since the action wi 11 not result in a physical change in the environment directly or ultimately, Refer to Public Resources Code Section 21065 (CEQA Section 15378). However, a project level environmental review would be required for development of vacant land to a commercial recreation use. FACTS FOR FINDINGS: The proposed amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan. It promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. The proposed amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and woula not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. CORRESPONDENCE: This item has been advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper and notices were mailed to all property owners within Subareas 1 and 2 of the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution reco~nending approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 94-02 to the City Council. ipxpResp lly. s ' ed, BB:NF/jfs. Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Planning Commission Minutes dated June 22, 1994 Exhibit 'Be - Applicant's Letter dated May 16, 1994 Exhibit "C" - Specialty Commercial District Description Exhibit "D" - Subareas 1, 2, and 3 Exhibit "Es - Excerpt from Summary of Land Use Table and Land Use Matrix of Subareas 1 and 2 Resolution Recommending Approval Draft City Council Resolution NOES: COMMISSIONERS: MCNIEL, KBSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NON~,_-~ "~ -carried that he was voting against the design, not DIRECTOR'S REPORTS OAS INVESTORS - A request to consider adding Commercial Recreation Use in the Specialty Commercial District within the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan. Brjd Buller, City Planner, presented the staff report. Chairman Barker invited public comment. William Walls, 941 Clear Creek Canyon Drive, Diamond Bar, said he planned to open an upscole billiard and sports viewing club with a sit-down pizza restaurant. He said he had obtained support from the Small Business Administration, OAS Investors, and the other tenants in the center. Commissioner Tolstoy asked the definition of upscale. Mr. Walls replied that it is a plush type club catering to strictly adults and they would be checking ID's of those going into the billiard portion of the club. He said he was trying to cater to white collar type individuals. There were no additional public comments. Commissioner Melcher suggested that the Commission should act with their eyes wide open. He reported the owners of the Book Cellar had told him they telscared to a shopping center at Hellman and Foothill because a billlard club had gone in at their previous center. He felt that the operation of this proposed billiard club may be adjusted to suit a different clientele than what was proposed because the main objective would obviously be to make money. He thought the use could be successful but felt the Co~nission should be alert to what has happened elsewhere. He favored moving forward with the amendment to add Commercial Recreation to the Speciality Commercial District, but he felt such a use may have to be regulated under the conditional use permit application. He thought this particular location may be far enough from the other elements of the shopping center so that it should work. Commissioner Tolstoy noted the applicant was asking for a specific place, and he agreed that may be a good location for that type of business. However, he noted that the amendment would allow the use in other places in. the City and those locations may not be sufficiently far enough away from residential areas. Planning Commission Minutes -19- June 22, 1994 Commissioner McNiel supported the concept. He noted that the billiard club adjacent to the theatres in Upland caters to a younger group and sometimes c~uses problems for theatre patrons. He thought this use would be similar to the club which had recently been approved for the Masi Center. Motion: Moved by Lumpp, seconded by McNiel, to direct to the applicant to apply for a Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan amendment to add Commercial Recreation as a conditional use in the Speciality Commercial District. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NONE NONE -carried . - ........ ~,, - _ .... m' M. SIGN OR~-,NANCE AMENDMENT 94-01 - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - Consideration of various ?mendments to the Sign Ordinance. Dan Coleman, PrinC~...~l Planner, presented the staff report, highlighting the work of the Sign Ti,k Force and the various options available to the Co~aission. Chairman McNiel praised Sign Task Force's participation and their efforts. He expressed his o that every time the Sign Ordinance has been reviewed it has been weakened; he felt that most of what the Sign Task Force had discussed was acce .e. Chairman Barker suggested the Comma reach consensus before moving on to the discuss the items individually and type of signs. Grand ODetint Signs: Commissioner Melcher felt such signs should be date for the business. include the opening Paula Dempsey, Chamber of Commerce and Lewis Homes indicated that tenants commonly request a "Coming Soon" corporation, There was a general consensus that the proposed changes without a specific opening date display requirement. acceptable TemPorary Advertisinu Signs: Ms. Dempsey felt the proposed changes were positive because business would have greater flexibility. She indicated that the change~ are consistent with what her tenants typically ask for. Planning Commission Minutes -20- June 22, 1994 ,.- .r-, "' 336 O A S Investors ~chard J.' O'Neill ,oward .~dler Horo~,'llz Trusl May 16, 1994 Ms. Nancy Fong Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CiTY or RECEIVED - RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DIVISION 4a MAY 19 1994 27'24 [ La Paz Ri ~ad Sune 125 Laguna Niguet. CA 92656 Phone: 17 14~ 831-5158 Fax: 1714) 831-4288 Re.' Amendment to 'the Foothill Specific Plan, Sub Area Two designated SC for Thomas Winery Center at the NE comer of Foothill Blvd. at Vineyard to permit a CUP process for · billlard & sports club featuring · full dining pizza restaurant called Cue and View, and a Non-Construction Conditional Use Permit for the building previously occupied by Gemmel's pharmacy and outlined in green on the attached site plan to accommodate Cues and Views Billlard Club. Dear Ms. Fong: Please consider this letter as fulfillment of Item 2 of the filing requirements for the above referenced specific plan amendment. Our justifications for requesting this amendment include: 1) With the City Council's approval of our reum request to amend the Foothill Specific Plan to permit the Cardie Fit Center, Thomas Winery Plaza is being reorlented to a specialty center emphasizing f~ness, ente~rtainment, and food. The proposed billlard club fits nicely into this specialty center theme. 2) Permitting this amendment continues the specialty center designation and allows Thomas Winery to truly become a theme specialty center. 3) Despite 8n aggressive leasing campaign it has been almost impossible to find suitable tenants under the SC designation as written beck in the late 80's. The retail environment has changed dramatically since the Foothill Specific Plan was written. Permitting this use, under the CUP process, in the SC designation will greatly assist in recognizing thi new retail realities. The owner of Thomas Winery Plaza has consistently waged the most competitive leasing campaign in the area, while maintaining the highest standards for the Center, despite huge vacancies. The entire Foothill/Vineyard areas has been in an unprecedented recession. We need the City's full support and cooperation to make the Ce,~d~~ I(:t~ area as viable as possible. 1.,, r_ :,,~ .,: ,"r 837 Ms. Nancy Fong May 16, 1994 Page Two 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) The operator and owner of the billlard club, Mr. William Walls, has given considerable thought to every aspect of what will be an upscale, high end operation, compatible with The other Tenants at the Thomas Winery Plaza. He has prepared a Thoroughly researched business plan that won the support and financing of The Small Business Administration. Similar high end billlard clubs have opened in Newport Beach and Irvine. The billlard club has The full support of 811 the Tenants at Thomas Winery. The owners of Cardio Fit and The new Frontier Steak House are particularly enthusiastic since They, as do the owners, find this use especially compatible with the new direction of The Center, and their uses in particular. Upscale billlard clubs have emerged as one of the 'hottest' retail uses in The industry, and are actively sought out by owners of shopping centers. They attract as many, if not more woman as man. Billiards has become an entertainment of choice for many upscale woman and men. The environment has To be decorous, upscase, safe, end inviting, and as comfortable as the best restaurants, although only light refreshments are served. Mr. Walls has provided amply to insure only The best for his club, and it will be on 8 par with those opening in affluent, upscale communities like Rancho Cucamong8. After careful review, we believe the peak hours of operation for the club are entirely compatible with Cardio F~, and the other retail uses in the upper portion of Thomas Winery. The billlard club's peek hours are in the later evening after Carclio Fit is closed, therefore creating dual use of parking. We see no problems with paring due to the difference in peak hour operations between these uses. We firmly believe that the billlard club will greatly assist in the revitalizetln of Thomas Winery as a specialty center, and enhance and facilitate the economic rHmargence of the Foothill/Vineyard sub area. A great deal of thought and attention has been given to safety and security, Bithough That hal not been 8 problem et other upscale clubs, and we do not 8nticipete that this club will cause any diffi.cultles. On the contrary, the plans for security will substantially help the Winery development which has hBd serious vendslisa 8rid grBffiti problems due to the high level of vBcancy. Ms. Nancy Wong May 16, 1994 Page Three 10) WiThouT The ability To lease to the billlard club, we see no future Tenant available to fit into the theme of Thomas Winery. In fact, if we 'are unable To proceed ahead with the billlard club, we face The prospect of a very long vacancy in the former Gemmel's space causing serious financial hardship, as well as a serious setback in our ability TO revitalize the Thomas Winery as a theme specialty center. Because the former Gemmel's space is The second largest in the Center with a considerable window onto Vineyard, a prolonged vacancy will be disastrous nOT only for Thomas Winery, but to the adjacent area as well. We are preparing The additional documents, maps, and adjacent owner labels required for The balance of The application, and will file These materials no later Than The end of This month along with the fees for The amendment and CUP. Please do nOT hesitate To contact me should you require any further information or explanations for our justifications. Please advise us of The Time schedule and other pertinent requirements that we have TO address. Mr. Walls and I, and any of our consultants are available to discuss, in person, any matter related TO this application. Please call me To arrange 8 m~ually convenient time. Sincerely, Manager, Thomas Winery Plaza and on behalf of Owner Santa Margarita Partnerl cc.' William Walls Herb Kostlen Omar Ben Helim Dan Parker 339 LAND USE CATEGORIES The planning area has been designed as a composite of various individual land use zones which provide a rich texture and diversity to the community. Specifically. these Land Use Categories consist of the following components: 6.3.1 Cc,,,,~a, The Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan area contains a variety of commercial facilities which are designed to promote diverse and unique shopping environments. The planning area contains a wide assemblage of commercial land use categories which range from tourist oriented specialty uses to regional associated commercial uses. In general, commercial land uses within the planning area range in size and character, based upon their respective relationship to location, type, and intensity of use. Commercial land use cateclories include: uses have been included into the specialty commercial category in order to facilitate ~ncttive office/commercial_._v4,,// 6.3.1.2 Community Commercial (CC) This land use district includes a wide variety of uses which typically include drug stores, supermarkets, apparel shops. variety stores, and commercial recreation uses. In general, Community Commercial Districts function to promote the estab- lishment of neighborhood/district level commercial goods and services. Typically, large community commercial complexes are designed to accommodate the needs of more than one neighborhood or subarea and include one or more major tenants accompanied by a variety of multi-tenant uses. Smaller, stand alone community commercial facilities are also permitted within various CC districts, located on smaller existing parcels, designed to accommodate smaller satellite land uses. Specialty Commercial Land Use Districts : are designed to accommodate specialty uses, which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience, which is unique to a particular subarea. For example, specialty uses such II }'///H/l,7/////, ", farmers markets, cafes, bakeries, gift shops, and ot]qer specialty theme oriented uses located adjacent to the Thomas Brothers Winery, compi~nt the existing winery structure and provide 8 unifying theme. Other specialty uses, such as the establishment of tourist oriented specialty uses (sit-down restaurants, specialty shops). lend support to the establishment of a theme oriented activity center which caters to visitors. Other specialty commercial activity centers include the Archibald and Vineyard intersections.. all of which include uses designed to an- hence the character of these respective subareas. A limited number of offic~ZZ 11-6.2 'Yl{I i'J lO. tt ~ LEGEND .r~,;:/:, RESIDENTIAL ----" I~ LOW DENIITT REIIDENTIAL '~ ~ ~ LOW-MEDIUM RISIDENTIAL ~ - p; "" ~ MEDIUM REIIDENTIAL ' "~ ~ MEDIUM-HIGH REIIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL '~, .~ COMMERCIAL [~ ,EciAL COMMERCIAL ~ [~ COMMUNITY COMMIRCIAL % "-" REOIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL OFFICE MIXED USE ~'~_OFFIC! ['~ICOMMERCIAL/OFFICE INDUSTRIAL r'~LIQHT INDUSTRIAL PUILI; FU"!UTILITV i'TIImUILIC [22! .,s,E. ,LA. ,.EA LAND USE PLAN LEGEND REIIDENTIAi LOW DENIITY RESIDENTIAL ~,~_.-" ~..~.o.-........0-.... MEDIUM-HIGH REIIDEHTIAL COMMIRCIAL ~ ~(~a~ COMMERCIAL I~IPECIAL COMMERCIAL ]COMMUNITV COMMERCIAL ~C~ REGIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL OFFICE MIXED USE iOFFICE COMMERCIAL/OFFICE INDUSTRIAL _r~_LIOHT INDUSTRIAL IT! [Z:! """" ,L,. LAND USE PLAI~ MH ¢ ft'l ul .'! il~ _LEGEND OFFICE RESIDENTIAl, ~ MIXED USE IL""ILOW-MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL i'~ COMMERCIAL/OFFICE i -~--~j MEDIUM IiEIIDENTIAL INDUiTRIAL ~ !nit] llEOIONAL RELATED COMMERCIAL ,r---t MASTER PLAN AREA LAND USE PLAN SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITTED/P) AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITTED (C) USES RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES APtlGUe SHOPS APParel a~ Boutlques C ) Genera I ~ppllance Stores and Repair- .Art, MUSIC. PhOtOgraCRIC StuCloS and Supply Stores Auto Service 5tatIon AUtO 5errIce (including trailers, motorcycles, Doats, campers): a) 5ales (with ancillary repair fact lit les) b) Rentals cJ MInor Repair (Odes no~ tnclu~ major engine work, muffler snobs, painting. Oooy work, uPholStery, etc.) q) Coln-op washing e ) Automat I C wash Ing ~) Parts an~ Supplies Bakeries (retail only) Barber and Beauty Shops Be<) an<) Breakfast BIcycle 5hops Blueprint an<) Photocopy Services ~took, GIft and Stationary 5totes :i P (other than adult relateO materlal)i:!~!!::!iZ P P P Can<)y an<) ConfectlonerleS '~!;~ii~i~!i P P Catering EstaOllshments ::~i~;~isi P P china an<) Glassware Stores !i:::~T;:.: p p Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots ~ (operating on a temporary Das ls) .!:~>:::ii:: P Churches :>{ii~i~! C C C Cleanmq an<) Presslnq EstaDllshmentS~i!!!;:!iii~! P P p cockta;I Lounge (Par. lounge.tavern) :i~iiiii~!ii~ clu<)lng related entertainment i{i~i{~!~!~ C C C a) ,n<)oor uses such as Dow llng i~iii,!~))!i and D I I lardS ::ii~!i!i{:.) p u=doo,- Gses such as ten.,. P P ,:.:~:.::~:- and DaskeCDall :;::::~;~C C Convalescen~ Facilities and HOSplCalS:E~E:;~:~ p p p C~r:am and Drapery Shops .... · P Day Care Centers Delicatessens and Specialty Food 5totes Drug 5totes and Pharmacies a) over I0.000 D) Pharmacies with or without specialty retail uncer I0.000 CCC .... ; P C · SuParea Pp :.. :.:.:; : ::!:~:~:::~. ::::~::!~ :::::::::::: ::"~:~:!:~:i pp ':':':': ..-... p p C C C C .-!: .: PP C :V-94 a Subarea Three SuParea FcLF 5C CC CO L"P 'R U "U ::CC PPC ~P L C C :~:~C C ::~:~!:~ P P P P :~:~ P P ;:::::~ :-~:~(:~: C C C C C 5L~i~iL~i~ C C P P P P ::~ P P CCC ........ C C .:~.::>E~ ::-:::~:~ .:: ::. P P P P .~::2~ P '::~:~ P P ::~;::~ p P C C C P Retail Commercial Uses - Continued Land Use Christmas Tree Sales lots operated on a temporary basis SC CC X O MR P Churches O O O Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X Cocktail Lounge (bar. lounge, tavern) ncludin related entertainment O O Commercial Recreation- ,....._a) Indoor uses such as basketball O O O Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O O Curtain and Drapery Shops X Day Care Centers O O O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X Drug Stores and Pharmacies: a) over 10,000 sq ft b) pharmacies with or without spe- cialty retail under 10.000 sq ft O X Farmers Markets X Floor Covering Shops X Florist Shops X X X Furniture Stores X X Hardware Stores X Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics X O Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Slores and Soda Founlams Jamlor~al Serwces and Supphes ~e.,sea 4 18 90 IV-9 12 X X X p .C ..t::-rc:,- SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA ONE It Retail Commercial Uses Continued Land Use S C C C Candy and Confectioneries :<. X Catering Establishments X China and Glassware Stores X X Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots operated on a temporary Basis X Churches O Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment O O ' Commercial Recreation: ~ a~ Indoor uses such as bowling, billiards O .-:-~_..~.- - Outdoor uses suCh as tenms and basketball Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals Curtain and Drapery Shops X X Day Care Centers O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X Drug Stores and Pharmacies: a) over 10,000 sq ft X pharmacies with or without spe- cialty retail under 10,000 sq ft O Farmers Markets X Floor Covenng Shops O O MHR MR 0 0 0 Revised: 4/18~90 IV-9.26 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA TWO RESOLUTION NO. 94-74 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, REQUESTING TO AMEND THE SPECIFIC pI.,ua~ BY ADDING INDOOR COMMERCIAL RECREATION AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS 1 AND 2, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. A. Recitals. 1. SiS Investors has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 94-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Heroinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of August 1994, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly no=iced public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2, Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on August 10, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows= a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c. This amendment would not be materially injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs I and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment would not have impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and significant 347 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. FBSPA 94-02 - OAS INVESTORS August 10, 1994 Page 2 b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby finds and determines that the project identified abo~e in this Resolution has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed amendment will have a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed amendment is exempt pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 94-02, to modify the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan per the attached City Council Resolution. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 1994. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY:~ar~~~ McNiel, Vice Chairman A I, Brad Bullet, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly in=reduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the city of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of August 1994, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERSt LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02 - OAS - A request to amend the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan by adding Commercial Recreation as a conditionally permitted use in the Specialty Commercial District in Subareas 1 and 2. Nancy Fong, Senior Planner, presented the staff report and stated that a letter had been received from a nearby resident objecting to the establishment of a billiard ~arlor in the Thomas Winery center. Commissioner Melcher questioned why staff was recommending that the use be permitted instead of conditionally permitted. Ms. Fong responded that Commercial Recreation had been changed to a permitted use in other subareas along Foothill Boulevard during the streamlining amendments and it was felt this amendment would be consistent. She observed that the serving of' beer and wine or any alcohol in such an establishment would trigger the need for a conditional use permit. Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that indoor recreational uses have been well received in the community and noted that concerns the Commission had previously raised regarding these uses were primarily with the serving of alcohol in conjunction with such uses, which would still require the application of a conditional use permit. Commissioner Lumpp asked the location of the resident who had sent the letter of objection. Ms. Fong replied that she thought it is the complex south of In-N-Out Burger. Vice Chairman McNiel opened the public hearing. Bill Walls, 941 Clear Creek Canyon Drive, Diamond Bar, stated he is the proposed tenant for the billiard and sports club and he was available to answer any questions. He presented pictures of the type of club he planned to open. He.said they plan to cater to clientele 18 and over. Ms. Fong stated the applicant has submitted a conditional use permit application because they plan to serve beer and wine and that application would be considered by the Commission on August 24, 1994. Commissioner Lumpp thought that if an upscale environment is maintained, it would be a good use. Bill Berry, project manager, stated that he represented the owner of the Thomas Winery center. He said they are also concerned that the use be an upgraded establishment. He noted that the food serving area is a focal point of the establishment. He said there would also be large screen TVs for viewing of sporting events. He felt the ambiance would be d~fferent from the old concept of musty, smokey pool halls. He believed this'use would be a good compliment for the fitness center in the opposite corner of the center. He said they had done market studies and studies of comparable uses 'at other centers and were favorably impressed. He felt the main use would be after Planning Commission Minutes -3- August 10, 1994 5" FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 349 6:00 p.m., so there should be no parking problems. He thought it would be an asset to the center. Commissioner Lumpp stated that when the Commission had previously reviewed another billiard hall, that applicant had requested hours of operation until 3:00 a.m. Mr. Walls stated they intend to close at 2:00 a.m. on Fridays and Saturdays and either 1:00 or 1:30 a.m. during the rest of the week. Hearing no further testimony, Vice Chairman McNiel closed the public hearing. Commissioner Melcher noted that the item had originally been listed to add the use as a conditionally permitted use rather than a permitted use. Mr. Buller responded that when the item was originally advertised, it had been to make the use conditionally permitted, but the streamlining amendments before the City Council had made such a use permitted in other subareas. He said it would be legally permissible to recommend approval as a permitted use. Commissioner Melcher felt that if the use becomes permitted, the City loses its ability to police it other than through the Police Department. He was not sure that was a wise choice. He commented that he had talked to the owner of a combination book store and coffee house and the owner indicated he had relocated to another center after a billiard club moved into the original center because he did not like the kind of people that were being attracted by the billiard club. He was concerned about the possibility to revoke the use if there are recurring problems. He asked if staff concurred with his concerns. Mr. Buller stated that staff had believed the issue with billiard halls has a lot to do with the serving of alcohol in conjunction with the use and that billiards itself is merely another category of indoor recreational use. He commented that if the Commission felt billiards should require a conditional use permit, it could take action to recommend approval of the amendment as a conditionally permitted use and he would then suggest that another amendment be initiated to change the use to a conditionally permitted use in the other subareas. Commissioner Melcher felt the Commission should move forward in the direction suggested by staff in their report to the Commission. Motion: Moved by Eelchef, seconded by Lumpp, to adopt the resolution recommending approval of Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 94-02. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: LUMPP, MCNIEL, MELCHER NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARKER, TOLSTOY -carried Planning Commission Minutes -4- D F AFT r,, ,,SSiOh F,JRPCSES ONLY August 10, 1994 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT 94-02, AMENDING THE FOOTHILL BOULEVARD SPECIFIC PLAN BY ADDING INDOOR COMMERCIAL RECRESTION AS A PERMITTED USE IN THE SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WITHIN SUBAREAS 1 AND 2. A. Recitals. 1. OAS Investors has filed an application for Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment No. 94-02, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 10th day of August 1994, the Planning Co~znission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and, following the conclusion thereof, adopted its Resolution No. 94-74, recommending that the City Council adopt this amendment. 3- On September 7, 1994, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing on September 7, 1994, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. This amendment does not conflict with the Land Use Policies of the General Plan; and b. This amendment promotes the goals and objectives of the Land Use Element and the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan; and c. This amendment would not be materjail[ injurious or detrimental to the adjacent properties and would not have a significant impact on the environment nor the surrounding properties. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. FBSPA 94-02 - OAS INVESTORS September 7, 1994 Page 2 3- Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during _the above-~eferenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties; and b. That the proposed amendment is in conformance with the General Plan. 4. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds that the project has been prepared and reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended, and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder, and further, specifically finds that based upon substantial evidence, it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the proposed Resolution will have a significant effect on the environment and; therefore, the proposed Resolution is exempt pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15061 (b)(3). 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Council hereby approves Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan Amendment 94-02, to modify the Foothill Boulevard Specific Plan as shown on the attached Exhibit A. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. SUMMARY TABLE OF PERMITTED (P) AND CONDITIONALLY PERMITrED (C) USES RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES Antique Shops Apparel a) Boutiques D) General Appliance Stores apt, RepalE Art. MUSIC, PhotograCPIc Studios and Supply Stores Auto Service Station Auto ServIce (Including trailers, motorcycles, boats, campers): a) Sales (with ancillary repair facilities) b) Rentals c) Minor Repair (does not Include major engine work. muffler shops. painting. body work, uphOlStery. etc.) d) Coln-op washing e) Automatic Washing f) Parts and Supplies Bakeries (retail only) Barber and Beauty 5hops Bed and Breakfast BIcycle Shops Blueprint and PhotoCOpy Services Book, GIft and Stationary Stores ::> .3,4p ~p (other than adult related materlal)~iiii:~iiii:ii P P P Candy and Conrectlonerles i~i~iii!iiii P P Catering Establishments i~ii~iiiiii~i~ p p .....,....... China and Glassware Stores ii!i:iii!i!i~i P p Christmas Tree/PumpKin 5ales Lots .............. (operating on a temporary DasIs) ~!:i~!~?~!~ p .,-.-.-..... .....-...... ChurCheS :!ziiiiz!iiiii C C Cleaning and DreSSInG EstaD l~sl~mentt:ii!iEiiiii!i~ p p p C~,CK',all LCLnge (bar, lOur,~e.:avern: :r'Cl~.Cln.; rela:ed erter:alnmert C C C Ccmmerc~a'~'~cr"~t'i,,'~"p.' ncocr uses s~,ch as bowling and DIIlar:S ~JuLCC~r ~-.es St, Oh as ten,,s~ arc ;.asxetDall C C Ccnvalescer'. Fac~ll:les aPd HOSpitalS p p p CLr.'alP and Draoerv Shops p PpP Day Care Cen:ers Dellcar, essePs arc Specialty FoOd S:cres Drug Stores and Pharmacies a) over 10,000 sol. spedlaity retail under I 0,000 .... ~:~ sq. ft. :: Revised: I--I-/--~/~1 C C C 5Leared 'r'ree 5C CC CO L:~ :"P U MU 5boatea FOur CC PPC ~P L: p p p p p P P :, p p p p CCC FIpP C C PPP ;::> p P p p C Iv-9.4 a PPP :::>~:E?! p p p ?i:~:i:i:i:i .............. P P ::i:i:i:i:i:i: :.:::::~:k:~ ::~:!:!:!:i:!: ...... p .............. p P :~:~:i:i:!:!:i i!~i~i~!~!i!~ C C C C CCC : ~,::,::::i :i.~:T:!:~:~: P P P ~!i~ p P* P 0 C p p* P ~ii:!i:iisii PP C c ~i~!ii~iic c c D :::::::::::: PP C C C C P C C C C PP P P P C PP P C C r P p P p p CCC C CC C C C C P P P 'C D p p- 4t RetaU Commercial Uses - Continued Land Use S C C C O Christmas Tree Sales lots operated on a temporary basis X Churches O O Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) cluding related entertainment O O O Commercial Recreation: ' a) In.d?o.r uses such as bowling, . p ses such as tennis and basketball O O Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O Curtain and Drapery Shops X Day Care Centers O O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X Drug Stores and Pharmacies: a) over 10,000 sq ft X b) pharmacies with or without spe- cialty retail under 10,000 sq ft O Farmers Markets X Floor Covering Shops X Florist Shops X X X Furniture Stores X X Hardware Stores X Health and Athletic Gyms and Weight Reducing Clinics X O Hobby Shops X X Ice Cream Stores and Soda Fountains X X Jan~torial Services and SupDlies X =~ev,sea 4 18 90 IV-9.12 MR P O O SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREAON~EJj~r)z~J: Retail Commercial Uses Continued Land Use SC CC O MHR MR Candy and Confectioneries Catering Establishments ./~r. X X China and Glassware Stores X X Christmas Tree/Pumpkin Sales Lots operated on a temporary Basis X Churches O O O O Cleaning and Pressing Establishments X X Cocktail Lounge (bar, lounge, tavern) including related entertainment C/~b//~mmercial Recreation: a) Indoor uses such as bowling, Outdoor uses such as tennis and basketball O O O P O O Convalescent Facilities and Hospitals O O O O Curtain and Drapery Shops X X Day Care Centers O O O O Delicatessens and Specialty Food Stores X X Drug Stores and Pharmacies: a) over 10,000 sq ft b) pharmacies with or without spe- cialty retail under 10.000 sq ft X Farmers Markets Floor Covering Shops Revised: 4/18/90 IV-9.26 X X SUB-AREA DESIGN STANDARDS AND LAND USE REGULATION SUBAREA TWO DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jerry Fulwood, Deputy City Manager Susan Mickey, Management Analyst I UPDATE BY MARK8 CABLEVIMION STAFF REPORT At the June 1 City Council meeting, Mr. William Marks Sr., owner of Marks CableVision, outlined several problems that the cable company was experiencing in combining two cable systems into one system. Mr. Marks referred to reception difficulties, billing problems and complications with the phone system. Realizing that the cable company had undertaken a major project and that some problems, at least initially, were inevitable, the Council requested that Mr. Marks return to the Council in 90 days to provide them with an update of cable issues. Below is a tabulation of phone calls received by the City over the past several months. March April May June July August 1 - 25- 38 calls received 97 calls received 37 calls received 61 calls received 28 calls received 43 calls received William Marks Sr. has provided the Council with a timeline as to what steps the cable company has taken, and plans to take in the future, in its effort to upgrade the cable system. The timeline is attached for the Council's reference. Also attached is a phone statistics report provided by Marks Cablevision. This report details the number of calls received, number of customer service representatives answering the phones, delay time in answering, etc. Marks CableVision continues to work with staff in resolving cable issues as they occur. Re~pe fully ubmi ted ity Manager 356 MARKS CABLEVISION TIME TABLE FEBRUARY: · February 1 - Marks CableVision purchases Simmons Cable MARCH: March 1 - 10 - All channels are "opened" in north Rancho Cucamonga for previous tiered subscribers at no charge for 30 to 40 days to sample the new Marks CableVision basic service. Customers were notified at least 30 days in advance of this change. A local 1-800 phone number is implemented. Billing cycles are changed according to geographic region for simplicity. All south Rancho customers are billed on the 1 st of each month. All north Rancho customers are billed on the 10th of each month. This allows us to distribute phone and work volume more evenly throughout the month to improve efficiency. · A fiber optic interconnect is completed connecting the south Rancho system to the north Rancho system. Full Saturday office hours and evening phone hours are implemented. Our new hours are: Office Hours - 9:00am to 6:00pro - Monday through Saturday Phone Hours - 8:00am to 7:00pm -Mon, Tues, Thurs & Fri. 9:00am to 7:00pro - Wednesday 8:00am to 5:00pm - Saturday MAY: · New state of the art addressable converter boxes are distributed to south Rancho residents. 857 June 2 - One channel lineup is created throughout %he city. 9 new ch~mels are added to south Rancho line-up 5 new channels are added to north Rancho line-up June 2 - Pay-per-view is made available to south Rancho residents for the first time. Additional outlet fees are reinstated in north Rancho at $4.00 for the second television set, $3.00 for the third set. The fourth, fifth and sixth outlets are free. This monthly rate is an overall decrease in additional outlet fees for south Rancho customers and an overall decrease in additional outlet fees from what Simmons Cable had been charging just last fall. Monthly basic service rates are reduced for 10,000 north Rancho customers to $23.65. Rates are adjusted to the same level for south Rancho customers. One uniform rate, service, and technology now exist throughout Rancho Cucamonga. AUGUST: · August 1 - a new convenient and centrally located office opens at the Terra Vista Town Center. The 19th Street office is closed. SEPTEMBER: A fiber optic node location will be installed in the Etiwanda area. This node will reduce the number of amplifiers in that section of the city. The end result will be, improved picture quality and a reduction in outages. MARKS CaDleVis&on Week FH. 05/27/94 8 810 849 80% 22 2.7% .~L 05/28/94 i0 295 193 65% 12 4 1% 94 65% Tuet 05/31/94 8 1210 976 Weal, 06/01/94 8 1712 1499 Thtat, OGA]2J94 10 * 1968 1518 Fd, 06/03J94 10 1237 na SM. 06R)4/94 10 ~ 919 878 Man. O&fOG/g4 8 12H 1128 87% Tue8. 06R37/94 8 1538 1345 87% We. 06/08/94 10 1339 1236 92% Thum 06/09/94 8 1321 986 75% F~, 06/10/94 9 1296 1122 87% ,e.~. 06/11/94 10 912 885 Mort. 06/13/94 8 1067 877 82% Tuet 06/14/94 9 1405 1196 Wedl 06/15/94 9 1068 882 83% Thum, 06/16/94 10 1139 1000 88% Fn, 06/17/94 g 1040 879 85% SN. 06/18/94 10 518 516 89% Men 06/20/94 8 1572 1383 Tues, ' 06/21/94 9 1709 1216 71% We~tfi 06/22/94 9 1391 1180 85% Thurl 06423/94 9 1851 1681 91% Fn 06/24/94 9 1355 1154 SN. 06/25/94 10 1059 907 86% Mcm 06/27/94 g 1334 1150 Ta 06/28/94 12 1566 1451 93% Weos 06/29/94 13 1135 1073 Thu~l 06rJ0/94 13 916 901 92% "-nthly TOTAL 1.41 36,098 29,961 ~ 13% 81% 234 19 3% 55,5 63% M% 223 13 0% 94 32% 77% 450 22.9% 74 32% 0% na 0 0% na na H% 41 4 5% 106 40% 168 13 0% 152 26% 197 12.8% 17 34% 103 7 7% 139 34% 207 334 25.3% 152 33% 205 174 13 4% 166 23% 202 21 3,0% 170 24% 207 Ig0 17 8% 303 31% 254 209 ~i9% 190 36% 221 186 17 4% 151 30% 236 139 12 2% 166 28% 243 161 15 5% 166 29% 222 62 10 7% 224 30% 226 189 12 0% 223 32% 281 493 28 8% 217 32% 26O 211 15 2% 237 40% 232 170 9 2% 215 34% 163 201 14 8% 220 36% 237 152 14 4% 334 42% 223 184 13 8% 244 21% 268 115 7 3% 153 34% 221 62 S 5% g} 41% 243 75 7 7% 139 65% 228 4,784 13.3% 159.6724t 36% 228 Ilfz Tuet 07/0e/14 10 1Z72 1121 ~ 07,'01~4 0 1237 1t38 Thum. 0//0/~,I 11 1014 M 071 I ~I ~. ~ tO II 11M T~ 0711~ 11 N7 ~ ~l 12 I ~ 01~1t 10 11 1~1 Ta 07~ 12 1~ ~ ~ 0 91,1, 91'1, 71% 64,1, 81,1, 7a1, 811, E~R 151 II 91 277 24Q 321' 151 131 57 130 123 1O 475 3TI 208 3~7 153 I 11.fll 7.~11. &l~ 37.F& /03 14,0~J~ 138 411 71.80~ :}01 31% ge4 I~ 101, 170 al, 2M 133 73.13% 124 30% 222 e~' 72.2~, 124 521 5~.021 loe ~ 242 311 uSO~ 51 4/~ 271 17.3~ I~1 74.00t, 175 ~ 12.1% 7.4'A 10.51, 7.81, 4.21& 15.0ql 19.4% ~R 818 71.44% 54~ 81.01~ 13 320 32./~% 50 3e0 54,21% 153 ERR E]tR 100 ~ 218 63 t 215 54 71% 2;2 130 31% 251 ', 38% 279 43% 24e 53% 242 t ~ 171, tge 78% 193 I1.11 6:2% 221 359 Dly of Week Date TUES 06/02/94 WED oe/03~ THURS oe/OM;4 FRI 06/05/94 SAT 08/06/94 '_"t~T ...... "'Yhum. O~'fi,'9,i Fd. 08/12/94 Average Sifting Total Cab Told Cab 11 13 13 10 1577 1037 10 ' "13(10 ............ 1075 13 13 12 "il ...... 9 tST0 t153 t343 1195 1402 1221 0 0 823 812 1350 1182 1889 1643 Mo.. 08/15/94: 12 1581 Tu.. o8/1&~4 i 13 161j" W.edg. 08/17,'~,i' 'I"i~Z ..........'i t 52" Thurs. 06/18'94 ] 13 878 Fd 08/19/94 '; ........... Tues. ~ Weds. 06/24/94 Th~s. 08r25/94 Fd. Sat. 06/27/94 .MoMhly. TOTAL 1300 t316 i086 876 0 0 ~1.7is714 0 0 0 0 18,635 MARKS CableVision TiCIlls ~lh~ndoned 66% 54O 7'3% 417 87% 181 ERR ERR IK)% 101 99% 11 94% 61 88% 168 87% '2:,i8' 84% 252 Peecmeage if"Number Panel Calls Cans Cab ERR ' ERR 34.2% 1000 96,43% 21.o% 658 71:81%' t0.8% 501 4t.82% 129% 410 33.58% ERR ERR ERR "'L~R 5.8% 381 12.4% 550 46.53% 13.0% 696 42.48% 16.1% 131 10.01% 81% 300 94% 66 100% 2 ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR 18.6% 149 11.32% .... s.~ 229~T99% 0 2% .... im 7.63% ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ............ ERR ERR ERR ERR 63% ERR ERR ERR ' ' EhR ......... ERR .... ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR ERR Per Of Cdls Tel '. 15% 241 ~ t4% 226 ,,,.. 27'% 65% 195 80% 20O 84% 204 65% 194 43% 212 41% 103 74% 186 87% 150 iiiii:.ii~:::.::~::ii::~!~::i::!~Lii:.ii::ii~::ii;!::i~i::i~i!::iiii~/:i::i!:;i:!~:::!::;~::iii::?:iii i::iii!::'~::ii!::::::i::i!i:;i:;:::;iiii:::;iii:;i:::: 143 64% 192 Dell Call 152 88 34 43 76 84 135 103 73 89.357' ................ ::::::::::::::::::::::: 06:51 AM DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager DESIGNATION OF A VOTING REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE FOR THE LEAGUE OF CITIES ANNUAL MEETING AN RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council designate a voting representative and an alternate who can be present at the Business Session of the Annual League Meeting on October 25, 1994, at the Long Beach Convention Center. BACKGROUND / ANALYSIS This year's League Annual Meeting is scheduled for October 23 through October 25, 1994. At the Business Session, which is to take place on Tuesday, October 25, 9:30 a.m., the membership will be taking action on resolutions which will guide cities and the League in an effort to improve the quality responsiveness and vitality of local government within the State of California. The League is requesting each City designate a voting representative and an alternate to be present at the Business Session to vote on matters affecting municipal and/or League policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. R~ectfully submitted, JaZk Lain, AICP City Manager JL/dja Attachment 361 League of California Cities 1400 K STREET · SACRAMENTO, CA95814 · (916),!~,,!, 5790 Work Together July 11, 1994 The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Don Benninghoven, Executive Director Re: Designation of Voting Delegate for League Annual Conference This yeaz's League Annual Conference is scheduled for Sunday, October 23 through Tuesday, October 2.5, 1994 in Long Beach. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the General Business Meeting when the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual Conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. It is important that all cities be represented at the Business Meeting on Tuesday, October 25, at 9:30 a.m. at the Long Beach Convention Center. To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting, each city council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Business Meeting. League Bylaws provide that each city is entided to one vote in matters affecting municipal or League policy. A voting card will be given to the city official designated by the city council on the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form." If the mayor or a member of the city council is in attendance at the Conference, it is expected that one of these officials will be designated as the voting delegate. However, if the city council will not have a registered delegate at the Conference but will be represented by other city officials, one of these officials should be designated the voting delegate or alternate. Please complete and return the enclosed "Voting Delegate Form" to the Sacramento office of the League at the earliest possible time (not later than Friday, September 30, 1994), so that proper records may be established for the Conference. The voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card at the designated Voting Card Table located in the League Registration Area. The voting procedures to be followed at this Conference are printed off the reverse side of this memo. Your help in returning the attached "Voting Delegate Form" as soon as possible is appreciated. If you have any questions, please call Lorraine Okabe at (916) 444-5790, ext. 236. League of California Cities Annu:~l Conference Votinf Procedures Each member city has a fight to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. To cast the city's vote a city official must have in hi.~ or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League for use by the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate or alternate may pick up the city's voting card at the voting card desk in the conference registration area. Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and alternnte is permitted. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Meeting, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. Prior to the Business Meeting, exchanges may be made at the "Voting Card" table in the League Registration Area. At the Business Meeting, exchanges may be made at the "Voting Card" table in the front of the meeting room. Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures. Only the signatures of city officials, who, according to the records of the Credentials Committee, are authorized to use the city's voting card and who have !eft a sample of their signature on the Credentials Committee register will be approved. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the fight of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. L:~olicy\acres\voteproc f DATE: TO: FROM: BY: SUBJECT: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA :,:-.: STAFF REPORT September 7, 1994 Mayor and Members of the City Council Jack Lam, AICP, City Manager Rick Gomez, Community Development Director Scott Murphy, AICP, Associate Planner ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE FORMATION RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the selection process for filling the remaining positions on the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force. BACKGROUND: On August 3, 1994, the City Council authorized the formation of an Ad Hoc Task Force to review issues relative to the design of the Route 30 Freeway and provide recommendations to the City Council on a preferred design alternative. The Council determined that the Task Force should be comprised of 2 members of the City Council, 2 members of the Planning Commission, 2 members of the Chamber of Commerce, and 8 residents from the community. The 8 residents should be made up of 6 "corridor" residents and 2 "at large" residents from the community. The corridor residents should be evenly distributed between the western portion (2 members), central portion (2 members), and the eastern portion (2 members). ANALYSIS: On August 22, 1994, the City Council (Bill Alexander, Chuck Buguet); Planning Commission (David Barker, Larry McNiel); and C-CAR (Jane Bradshaw, Gay Lee Hinazumi) representatives; met to consider the process by which the remaining members of the Task Force would be selected. The Task Force recommends that the Task Force be filled in a manner consistent with the previous Council actions on various commissions. The process would be as follows: An advertisement will be placed in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin inviting applications for the Task Force. The ad will run from September 10 to September 18, 1994. All applications must be received by the City Clerk's office by 5:00 p.m. on September 19, 1994. The applications will be reviewed by the ~xisting Task Force members on September 20, 1994. Interviews will be scheduled for September 22, 1994, and, if necessary, October 3 and 4, 1994. .CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE FORMATION September 7, 1994 Page #2 Th& recommendations of the Task Force will be presented to the City Council on October 5, 1994, for approval. OTHER MEMBERS: The Chamber of Commerce has selected Gary Christian and Donald Kurth as their representatives on the Task Force. In the event these or other members of the Task Force are unable to attend, the following alternates will fill in: 1. City Council - Diane Willjams 2. C-CAR - Frank Munoz 3. Chamber of Commerce - John Mannerino FU~.r. MEETING OF TASK FORCE: In anticipation of the selection of the remaining Task Force members, a meeting has been scheduled for October 11, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. The intention of this meeting is to define the work program for the Task Force and the scheduling of various items f consideration. Resp c~fu y submitted, R' nt Director :SM:js Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Sample Advertisement Exhibit "B" - Sample Application Exhibit "C" - Sample Interview Questions Exhibit "D" - Draft Mission Statement RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL invites applications to serve on the ROUTE 30 AD BOC TASK FORCE all voluntary positions Applicants must be a resident of Rancho Cucamonga and 18 years old or older Applications must be received by the City Clerk's office by SEPTEMBER 19, 1994 BY 5:00 P.M. Applications may be obtained at the City Hall 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE City Clerk's Office or call 989-185 1 366 CITIZEN'S APPLICATION TO SERVE ON THE ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE Name Address Phone: Home Occupation Education (list highest year completed and all degrees) Work' Zip Code P! FASI= NOTF:: MEMBERSHIP ON THE ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE WILL REQUIRE MONTHLY MEETINGS. THE ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE IS SCHEDULED TO MEET ON THE 2ND TUESDAY OF EACH MONTH AT 7:00 P.M.. THESE MEETINGS MAY RUN TWO TO THREE HOURS. THE ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE TASK FORCE ACTIVITIES MAY ALSO REQUIRE ADDITIONAL TIME FOR WORKSHOPS AND SUBCOMMITTEES. Are there any workday evenings you could not meet? If ,so, please list: Why are you interested in this position? (Add additional sheets if necessary) What do you consider to be your major qualifications? 367 ROUTE 30 AD HOC TASK FORCE APPLICATION Page 2 What do you see as the major issues facing the City with regards to the Route 30 Foothill Freeway? REFERENCES 1. 2. 3. Date: Signature RFTURN YOUR APPIICATION TO THF CITY CI FRK'S OFFICF Ry MONnAY. R;PTFMRFR 19. 1994 AT 5:00 P.M, 368 SUGGESTED QUESTIONS GENERAL NATURE OF REPLY Tell us about yohr experience and background and how you have prepared to serve on this commission. lI. Give an example of a sensitive or difficult decision you made and the process you've used to make the decision. III. Describe your experience in groups and organizations. What groups and organizations have you been associated with and what role did you play? How did you invision your role as it related to the leadership and other group members. IV. Do you have any questions of us? 369 ROUTF 30 An HOC TASK FORCF MISSION RTATFMFNT The purpose of the Route 30 Ad Hoc Task Force is to evaluate all economic, environmental, and design/engineering alternatives for construction of the Route 30 Freeway through the entire City limits and recommend a preferred alternative, consistent with City Council Resolution No. 94-143, to the City Council for their consideration and approval. 370 September 6, 1994 Mayor Dennis Stout Mayor Pro-Tern Buquet Councilmember Alexander Councilmember Gutierrez Councilmember Williams City Manager Jack Lam Our community is very much concerned that the fire protection and medical serwces may suffer as a result of the article carried in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin about the binding arbitration, and the effect on the budget. Consequently, enough signatures have been gathered by those who work and/or live in the District that feel this issue is worth your serious and honest concern and caring about our community, regardless of your, or our, personal feelings about arbitration. We would like to emphasize: * Support the proposed Paramedic program implementation, * Support the use of the Utility Tax for maintaining critical services, * Oppose any reduction of Fire Protection as a result of the increased personnel costs from the arbitration decision. Sincerely, e er . Bryan Encl:Signature sheets (5) August 17, 1994 Mayor Dennis Stout Mayor Pro-Tem Buquet Councilmember Alexander Councilmember Gutierrez Councilmember Williams City Manager Jack Lam We the undersigned who live and/or work in the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District: * Support the proposed Paramedic program implementation, * Support the use of the Utility Tax for maintaining critical services, * Oppose any reduction of Fire Protection as a result of the increased personnel costs from the arbitration decision. August 15, 1994 Mayor Dennis Stout Mayor Pro~Tem Buquet Councilmember Alexander Councilmember Gutierrez Councilmember Williams City Manager Jack Lam We the undersigned who live and/or work in the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District: * Support the proposed Paramedic program implementation, * Support the use of the Utility Tax for maintaining critical services, * Oppose any reduction of Fire Protection as a result of the increased personnel costs from the arbitration decision. Name- Printed C_qn+h~,~ L. kJe,,bon Address C?/~ (~691 Io%o% August 15, 1994 Mayor Dennis Stout Mayor Pro-Tern Buquet Councilmember Alexander Councilmember Gutierrez Councilmember Williams City Manager Jack Lam We the undersigned who live and/or work in the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District: * Support the proposed Paramedic program implementation, * Support the use of the Utility Tax for maintaining critical services, * Oppose any reduction of Fire Protection as a result of the increased personnel costs from the arbitration decision. Name - Printed Patri ci a F. Lay Address 10926 Countryview Drive, R.C. 91730 D. Michael Lay 10926 Countryview Dr., R.C. 91730 August 15, 1994 Mayor Dennis Stout Mayor Pro-Tem Buquet Councilmember Alexander Councilmember Gutierrez Councilmember Williams City Manager Jack Lam We the undersigned who live and/or work in the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District: * Support the proposed Paramedic program implementation, * Support the use of the Utility Tax for maintaining critical services, * Oppose any reduction of Fire Protection as a result of the increased personnel costs from the arbitration decision. Address / A\~ 5, Lo do J' ? d L//c/~ ,,cl9 D l?. /'g L '7'.A /_ c~ m n August 15, 1994 Mayor Dennis Stout Mayor Pro-Tern Buquet Councilmember Alexander Councilmember Gutierrez Councilmember Williams City Manager Jack Lam We the undersigned who live and/or work in the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District: * Support the proposed Paramedic program implementation, * Support the use of the Utility Tax for maintaining critical services, * Oppose any reduction of Fire Protection as a result of the increased personnel costs from the arbitration decision. Name ~ Printed Address ~oso r~F- P_eVF~- ~. ~.l 7,~7 tc~37 .S'~vt~TT~ C~. AC- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MILLIKEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION SLOPE AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS IN SAID CITY AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE TO RECEIVE BIDS WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to construct certain improvements in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared specifications for the construction of certain improvements. plans and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the plans and specifications presented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga be and are hereby approved as the plans and specifications for "Milliken Avenue Grade Separation Slope and Drainage Improvements". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to advertise as required by law for the receipt of sealed bids or proposal s for doing the work specified in the aforesaid plans and specifications, which said advertisement shall be substantially in the following words and figures, to wit: "NOTICE INVITING SEALED BIDS OR PROPOSALS" Pursuant to a Resolution of the Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California, directing this notice, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the said City of Rancho Cucamonga will receive at the Office of the City Clerk in the offices of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, on or before the hour of 2:00 P.M. on Tuesday, October 4, 1994, sealed bids or proposals for the "Mill iken Avenue Grade Separation Slope and Drainage Improvements". in said City. Bids will be publicly opened and read in the office of the City Clerk, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. Bids must be made on a form provided for the purpose, addressed to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, marked, "Bid for Construction of "Milliken Avenue Grade Separation ~ ope and Drainage Improvements". PREVAILING WAGE: Notice is hereby given that in accordance with the provisions of California Labor Code, Division 2, Part 7, Chapter 1, Articles 1 and 2, the Contractor is required to pay not less than the general prevail ing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the public work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for holiday and overtime work. In that regard, the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California is required to and has determined such general prevailing rates of per diem wages. Copies of such prevail ing rates of per diem wages are on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, 10600 Civic Center September 1, 1994 Engineering Division City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RE'C 'iVED S E P 0 6 1994 CI~ OF P, AN~HO CUCAMON ENGINEERiN~ DIVISION Engineering Division: I would like to address the issue rela~ing to the establishment of a nightclub in the Community Commerc'ial District, located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, east of Hermosa Avenue - APN 1077-601-07. I live in a residential area just northwest of the proposed location of the nightclub. I do not feel this type of business would be beneficial to the area. I have two small children and am concerned about the crime, noise, and other related problems associated with this type of business, remember Backwaters!!!! I would hate to see this nightclub be allowed to open in my neighborhood! Robin Gossage September 2, 1994 City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 Reference: Appeal on Planning Commission Resolution No. 94-42 Honorable Mayor and City Council, Please be advised that we have read the staff report and concur with its findings and request the issue to be referred back to the Planning Commission. Thank you, Eddie A. Lakkees cc: William J. O'Neil, City Engineer TO: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCA, MONGA · City of Rancho CucamonGc, Planning Division The development of good neighborhoods includes good resources nearby. Churches provide stability and community oriented progams. We the undersigned are pleased that St. Clare of Assisi is developing the land adjacent to Citation Homes. The historic landmark house and orchard are an asset to the area known as Etiwanda, and want them preserved as a sy'rnbol of the history of this area. We ask that the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga vote to affirm St. Cqm'e's 1 st. building already approved unanimously by the Planning Commissiom ADDRESS / 'F (n6 5 F'o,,-, (--.- FK,~ 5 5 r'a ,v.-~ P (/ , RECEIVED / . //// TO: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAi%IONGA CiTy of ~qancho Cucamonga Planning Division We the undersigned know that St. Clare of Assisi is developing the land adjacent to Citation Homes. The historic landmark house and orchard are an asset to the area known as Etiwanda, we want them preserved as a symbol of the history of this area. We believe St. Clare's plans to develop carefully and will be a benefit to our area. We ask that the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga vote to afrim St. Clare's I st. building already approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. NAME , ADDRESS TO: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AUG 2 9 1994 We the undersigned lmow that St. Cla~'e of Assisi is developin}illnofli~l~lt~l.~.~I10onOa to Citation Homes. The historic landmark house and orchard am an R~rtirl$ ion area known as Etiwanda, we want them preserved as a symbol of the history of this area. We believe St. Clare's plans to develop carefully and will be a benefit to Ollr area. We ask that the City CotmcLl of Rancho Cucamonga vote to affirm St. Clare's 1st. building already approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. NAME , ADDRESS / TO: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA RECEIVED AUG 2 ~ iS94 to Citation Hom;s. The historic landmark house and orchard am an asset to the area known as Etiwanda, we want them preserved as a symbol of the history of this area. We believe St. Clare's plans to develop carefully and will be a benefit to our area. We ask that the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga vote to affirm St. Clare's 1 st. building already approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. NAME ._' o ~th4 I ~t Pt ~ t o ADDRESS ~',/Z, zd',, Z'oz_~__ _/2 ,~ C ,.7 c ,a ...,_,2,.<.iL..?_ / '-,':--- ' ' RECEIVED TO: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City of Rancho Cuca~ The development of good neighborhoods includes good resources nearby.Planning Divisi0~ Churches provide stability and community oriemed pro~ams. We the undersigned are pleased that St. Clare of Assisi is developing the land adjacent to Citation Homes. The historic landmark house and orchard are an asset to the area known as Etiwanda, and want them preserved as a symbol of the history of this area. We ask that the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga vote to aftinn St. Clare's 1 st. building already approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. ADDRESS e.. ~ECEIVED TO: THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA City ot Rancho Cucamong3 Planning Division We the undersigned know that St. Clare of ,~sisi is developing the land adjacent to Citation Homes. The historic landmark hotk~e and orchard am an asset to fhe area known as Etiwanda, we want them preserved as a symbol of the hislorv of this area. We believe St. Clare's plans to develop carefully and will be a befie~t to our area. We asl< that the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga vote to affirm St. Ciare's 1 ~-t. building already approved unanimously bv the Planning Commission. NAME 22 JACK LAM, CITY MANAGER THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA P.O. BOX 807 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91729 ~'rNICflVED ._ CITy ~ANCN{:) CUCAMONGA i AUG 1994 DEAR MR. LAM, I AM PLEASED THAT CHURCHES ARE DEVELOPING IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA. NOT ONLY DO WE NEED A NEW LIBRARY TO MEET OUR GROWING CITYIS NEEDS, WE OBVIOUSLY NEED OTHER INSTIT- UTIONS THAT BRING STABILITY AND RESOURCES TO REALLY BE A "WORLD CLASS CITY." I HEARTILY ENDORSE THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF ST. CLARE OF ASSISI'S APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE F'ERMIT #94-0?. I WOULD NOT LIKE TO SEE FURTHER DEMANDS PLACED ON THIS TEMPORARY DEVELOPMENT STAGE- I AM SATISFIED THAT THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING AND PARKING LOT COOPERATES WELL WITH THE PRESERVATION ISSUES AS WELL AS WITH THE RURAL NATURE OF ETIWANDA WHICH IS A SOURCE OF PRIDE TO THIS CITY. PLEASE VOTE TO SUPPORT THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT ON SEPTEMBER 7, 1994. THANK YOU, CLAUDETTE NORRIS August 18. 1994 Jack Lam. City Manager The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 8e7 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 Dear Mr. Lamz I am writing to you in support of the Ci=y Planning Commission's unanimous approval for the St. Clare of A~sisi's Conditional Use Permit #94-e7. Any challenge ~o such a carefully designed building and parking area is inappropriate and could be viewed as a disregard for establishing churches as well as a low level of in=erest in preserving the impor=ant history of ~he E~iwanda area. en September 7. 1994. please vo~e Commissions approval for ~his permit. to suppor~ the Planning Sincerely. Llnda Jono . · =~i August 18, 1994 Jack Lam, City Manager The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga. CA 91729 RECEIVED AUG 2 9 1994 Dear Mr. Lamz City ol Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division I am writing to you in support of the City Planning Commission's unanimous approval for the St. Clare of Assisi's Conditional Use Permit #94-07. Any challenge to such a carefully designed building and parking area is inappropriate and could be viewed as a disregard for establishing churches as well as a low level of interest in preserving the important history of the Etiwanda area. in September 7, 1994, please vote to support the Commissions approval for this permit. Planning John D. Nardini 8316 Vineyard Ave. #B Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Jack Lam, City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 RECEIVED AUG 2 9 1994 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division Dear Mr. Larn, I am pleased that churches are developing in Rancho Cucamonga. Not only do we need anew library to meet our growing city's needs, we obviously need other institutions that bring stability and re- sources to really be a "World Class City." I heartily endorse the City Planning Commission's approval of St. Clare of Assisi's application for Conditional Use Permit ~{94-07. I would not like to see further demands placed on this temporary development stage. I am satisfied that the design of the building and parking lot works well with the preservation issues as well as with the rural nature of Etiwanda which is a source of pride to this city. Please vote to support the approval of this permit on September 7, 1994. Sincerely, Phyllis Smalley 6910 Basswood Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 91730 The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 RECEIVED AUG 2 9 1994 City of Rancho Cucamonga Dea~ ~ ~/,,, . _ -._- planning Division I am pleased that churches are developing in Rancho Cucamonga. Not only do we need a new library to meet our growing city's needs, we obviously need other institutions that bring stability and resources to really be a "World Class City." I heartily endorse the City Planning Comnission's approval of St. Clare of Assisi's application for Conditional Use Permit ~94-07. I would not like to see further demands placed on this temporary development stage. I am satisfied that the design of the building and parking area cooperates well with the preservation issues as well as with the rural nature of Etiwanda which is a source of pride to this city. Please vote to support the approval of this permit on September 7, 1994. The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 RECEIVED AUG 9 i994 City ol Rancho Cucamonga Dear ~/__ C--/',~ ..,-r; Planning Division I was very unhappy to learn that a developer coming in from Orange County is making every effort to undermine the efforts of a new church to build in the Etiwanda area of our city. It is time for the City Council to give a clear message of support for the life that will go on in our conm~mity long after outside developers have left. We need resources in ~ur c~,,~nity that are here to build up the fabric of our society rather than making a buck. I am looking forward to your being very clear that St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church receives that support from you on September 7, 1994.(CUP 94-07) r,ll.,~l rl' [ !' T The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 FIECEtVED AUG 9 1994 City ot Rancho Cucamonga planning Division I was very unhappy to learn that a developer coming in from Orange County is making every effort to undermine the efforts of a new church to build in the Etiwanda area of our city. It is time for the City Council to give a clear message of support for the life that will go on in our c~ununity long after outside developers have left. We need resources in our c~.~ity that are here to build up the fabric of our society rather than making a buck. I am looking forward to your being very clear that St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church receives that support from you on September 7, 1994.(CUP 94-07) r" ,n..l rl ......... '[ '"' ! The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 RECEIVED AUG 2 ,q iS94 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division I was very unhappy to learn that a developer coming in from Orange County is making every effort to undermine the efforts of a new church to build in the Etiwanda area of our city. It is time for the City Council to give a clear message of support for the life that will go on in our co~mlnity long after outside developers have left. We need resources in our community that are here to build up the fabric of our society rather than making a buck. I am looking forward to your being very clear that St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church receives that support from you on September 7, 1994.(CUP 94-07) The City of Rancho Cucamonga P.O. Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91729 RECEIVED AUG 2 9 1994 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Division I was very unhappy to learn that a developer coming in from Orange County is making every effort to undermine the efforts of a new church to build in the Etiwanda area of our city. It is time for the City Council to give a clear message of support for the life that will go on in our community long after outside developers have left. We need resources in our community that are here to build up the fabric of our society rather than making a buck. I am looking forward to your being very clear that St. Clare of Assisi Episcopal Church receives that support from you on September 7, 1994. (CUP 94-07) SEF~ -- O~IN~CENO. ~N ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCRO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DELETING, A8 AN URGENCY MEASURE, SECTION 14.16.010p2 OF THE RANCHO CUCANONGA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAININ~ TO TIME LIMITS FOR POLITICAL SIGNS AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF. a. R~O~tals. (i) Section 14.16.010P2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code currently provides a time limitation for the placement of political signs prior to an election. Recent cases Of the United States Supreme Court place in doubt whether such local restrictions on the political process are permissible. Recently, signs have been erected in the City for the November, 1994, election purportedly in violation of the above-referenced section. (li) The City Council finds and determines that the preservation of the electoral process as a free and open exchange of ideas is desirable for all residents of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The presence of the above-referenced section could threaten open and free political participation and, therefore, this Council finds that to protect the health, welfare and safety of persons to participate in the political process it is immediately necessary to repeal the above-referenced section. B. Ordinance. It is hereby ordained by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: Se~n ~. The City Council hereby finds that the findings and conclusions set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct and that this Ordinance is necessary as an urgency measure to protect the health, welfare and safety of persons within the City of Rancho Cucamonga pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 36937(b). Beetion ~. Section 14.16.010P2 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code is hereby repealed. Bection ~. This Ordinance is hereby declared to be an urgency measure pursuant to the terms of California Government Code Section 36937(b) and this Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. ~eotion i. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published within fifteen (15) days after its adoption at least once in Th~ Daily ~eport, a newspaper of general circulation published in the City of Ontario, California and circulated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. PASSED this day of , 1994. Mayor I, Debbie Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cuoamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 1994, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ATTEST: Debbie Adams, City C~erk, City of Rancho Cucamonga t.~).3)%ORDSXGN,S%RC I. 3. ?,B